Proposal
1 – Election of Directors
Shares
represented by properly executed proxies will be voted, unless such authority is
withheld, for the election as directors of the Company of the following ten
persons recommended by the Board of Directors (the “Board”), to hold office
until the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have
been elected and qualified. Each of the nominees listed below was
elected at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, except for Mr. Dinkins, who
was appointed as a director effective November 7, 2008.
If any
nominee for any reason should become unavailable for election or if a vacancy
should occur before the election (which events are not expected), it is intended
that the shares represented by the proxies will be voted for such other person,
if any, as the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee shall
designate. Information regarding the nominees standing for election
as directors is set forth below:
Nominees
for Director
Pamela
G. Bailey is 60, is a member and Chair of the Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee, a member of the Compensation and Organization Committee,
and has been a director since 2002.
Ms.
Bailey is President and Chief Executive Officer of The Grocery Manufacturers
Association (“GMA”), a Washington, D.C. based trade association. From
April 2005 until January 2009, she was President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Personal Care Products Council. Ms. Bailey served as President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Advanced Medical Technology Association
(“AdvaMed”), the world’s largest association representing the medical technology
industry, from June 1999 to April 2005. From 1970 to 1999, she served
in the White House, the Department of Health and Human Services and other public
and private organizations with responsibilities for health care public
policy. Ms. Bailey is a director of MedCath Corporation, a national
provider of high acuity healthcare services, and a director of The National Food
Laboratory, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of GMA and a provider of integrated
concepts to commercialization services to food industry
customers. She also is a member of the board of trustees of Franklin
and Marshall College.
Michael Dinkins is 55,
is a member of the Audit Committee, a
member of the Compensation and Organization Committee, and has been a director
since 2008.
Mr.
Dinkins is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of USI
Insurance Services, an insurance intermediary company. From 2005
until 2008, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hilb
Rogal & Hobbs Co., an insurance and risk management services
company. Mr. Dinkins was Vice President, Global Control &
Reengineering at Guidant Corporation from 2004 to 2005, and Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer for NCR Worldwide Customer Service Operation from 2002
to 2004. Prior to 2002, he held senior positions at Access Worldwide
Communications, Cadmus Communications Group and General Electric
Company.
Thomas
J. Hook is 46, is a member of the Technology Innovation Committee, and has been
a director since 2006.
Mr. Hook
is the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to
August 2006, he was the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, a position to which
he was appointed upon joining the Company in September 2004. From
August 2002 until September 2004, Mr. Hook was employed by CTI Molecular Imaging
where he had served as President, CTI Solutions Group. From March
2000 to July 2002, he was General Manager, Functional and Molecular Imaging for
General Electric Medical Systems. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Hook worked
for the Van Owen Group Acquisition Company and prior to that, Duracell,
Inc. He is a director of Central Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. and
serves on the audit committee of that board, Intelect Medical, Inc., HealthNow
New York, Inc., and the Buffalo-Niagara Partnership. Mr. Hook is also
a member of the board of trustees of St. Bonaventure University.
Kevin C. Melia is 61,
is a member and Chair of the Audit
Committee, a member of the Technology Innovation Committee, and has been a
director since 2007.
Mr. Melia
is the former non-executive Chairman of IONA Technologies PLC, a leading
middleware software company, a position he held from 2003 through
2008. From 2003 until November of 2007, he also was the non-executive
Chairman of A.Net (formerly Lightbridge Inc.), an e-payment
company. Mr. Melia was the co-founder, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Manufacturers’ Services Ltd. (“MSL”) from June 1994 to January 2003,
a leading company in the electronics manufacturing services
industry. Prior to establishing MSL, he held a number of senior
executive positions over a five-year period at Sun
Microsystems. Mr. Melia also held a number of senior executive
positions in operations and finance over a sixteen-year career at Digital
Equipment Corporation. He is a director of RadiSys Corporation, a
provider of embedded advanced solutions for the communications networking and
commercial systems markets, and serves on the audit committee of that board, and
Analogic Corporation, a high-technology signal and image processing
company. Mr. Melia also is a director of DCC plc, a procurement,
sales, marketing, distribution and business support services group headquartered
in Dublin, Ireland, and serves on the audit committee of that
board. He also is a joint managing director of Boulder Brook Partners
LLC, a private investment company and a member of the board of directors of
C&S Wholesale Grocers.
Dr.
Joseph A. Miller, Jr. is 67, is a member and Chair of the Technology Innovation
Committee, a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and
has been a director since 2003.
Dr.
Miller is Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer for Corning,
Inc. Before joining Corning in 2002, he served as Senior Vice
President of E.I. DuPont de Nemours from 1999 to 2001 and held various executive
positions with that company prior to that time. Dr. Miller also
serves on the board of directors of Dow Corning Corporation and serves on the
corporate responsibility committee of that board.
Bill
R. Sanford is 65, is Chairman of the Board, is a member of the Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee, and has been a director since
2000.
Mr.
Sanford is the Founder and Chairman of Symark LLC, a technology
commercialization and business development company. He is Executive
Founder and retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of STERIS Corporation,
a global provider of infection and contamination prevention systems, products,
services and technologies. Mr. Sanford serves on the board of
directors of KeyCorp and on the executive and risk management committees of that
board. He also is a director of several early and growth stage
private biosciences and technology companies and not-for-profit
organizations.
Peter
H. Soderberg is 62, is a member of the Audit Committee, a member of the
Compensation and Organization Committee, and has been a director since
2002.
Mr.
Soderberg is President and Chief Executive Officer of Hill-Rom Holdings,
Inc. From January 2000 to March 2006, he was President and Chief
Executive Officer of Welch Allyn, Inc., and prior to that, Chief Operating
Officer of Welch Allyn’s medical products business. Mr. Soderberg
serves on the board of directors of Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., Constellation
Brands, Inc. and AdvaMed.
William B. Summers, Jr. is 58, is
a
member and Chair of
the Compensation and Organization Committee, a member of the Audit Committee,
and has been a director since 2001.
Mr.
Summers retired in June 2006 as Chairman of McDonald Investments, Inc., a
position he had held since 1998. He also held the additional
positions of President (from 1989 through 1998) and Chief Executive Officer
(from 1994 through 1998) of that investment company. Mr. Summers
serves on the board of directors of RPM, Inc. and is a member and chairman of
its audit committee and a member of its executive committee, and on the board of
directors of Developers Diversified Realty, Inc. and is a member of its audit,
compensation and pricing committees. He also serves on the advisory
boards of Molded Fiberglass Companies, Dix & Eaton and MAI Wealth Advisors
LLC. Mr. Summers also serves on the board of directors of The Rock
and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum, Baldwin-Wallace College, The Great Lakes
Science Center, and the Community Partnership for Arts and Culture.
John
P. Wareham is 67, is a member of the Audit Committee, a member of the Technology
Innovation Committee, and has been a director since 2004.
Mr.
Wareham retired as Beckman Coulter, Inc.’s Chairman in April 2005 and as its
Chief Executive Officer in February 2005 after having held a number of positions
with the company beginning in 1984. Mr. Wareham is currently the
non-executive Chairman of STERIS Corporation and serves on the compensation
committee of that board. He also serves on the board of ResMed
Corporation and its audit and governance committees and on the board of Accuray
Incorporated.
Dr.
Helena S. Wisniewski is 59, is a member of the Technology Innovation Committee,
a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and has been a
director since 2008.
Dr.
Wisniewski is a member of the Naval Research Advisory Committee, a position to
which she was appointed in 2007 by the Secretary of the Navy. From
August 2004 until October 2008, Dr. Wisniewski served as Vice President,
Research and Enterprise Development at the Stevens Institute of
Technology. During that same period, she also was Chief Executive
Officer of Castle Point Holdings, Inc., a Stevens Institute-owned company that
invested in technology companies. From 2001 through 2004, Dr.
Wisniewski was Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Aurora Biometrics, a
company she founded. Before that, she was a senior executive at
Lockheed Corporation and a Vice President of Titan Corporation. Dr.
Wisniewski also serves on the board of directors of Smart Trax, Inc. an
educational media company, and on the advisory board to Soar Technology Inc., a
company that develops cognitive software to solve complex problems in
training, modelling and simulation, robotics, and medical
informatics.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”
THE
ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR.
Proposal
2 – Approval of the adoption of the Greatbatch, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive
Plan
Stockholders
are being asked to approve the Greatbatch, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the
“2009 Plan”), which was adopted by the Board on March 2, 2009, subject to
stockholder approval. If approved by stockholders, the 2009 Plan will
supplement the Company’s existing 2005 Stock Incentive Plan in providing
stock-based incentive compensation to select employees (including employees who
are directors and prospective employees conditioned on their becoming
employees), non-employee directors, consultants and service
providers. As of April 2, 2009, 229,868 shares were available for
issuance under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. The 2009 Plan
was designed by the Compensation and Organization Committee (the “Compensation
Committee”), with the assistance of management and an outside compensation
consultant, as part of a comprehensive compensation strategy to provide
long-term incentive for employees and non-employees to contribute to the growth
of the Company and attain specific performance goals. See the
Long-Term Equity Awards section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in
this proxy statement for further discussion.
Approval of the 2009 Plan will allow the
Company to continue to award grants of stock options, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights and stock bonuses to
employees and to non-employee directors, consultants and service
providers. A stock option is the right to purchase a certain number
of shares of stock, at a certain exercise price, in the future. A
stock appreciation right is the right to receive the net of the market price of
a share of stock and the exercise price of the right, in stock, in the
future. Restricted stock is a share award conditioned upon continued
employment, the passage of time or the achievement of performance
objectives. A restricted stock unit is the right to receive the
market price of a share of stock in stock or cash in the future. A
stock bonus is a bonus payable in shares of the Company's stock. The
purpose of these awards is to attract and retain talented employees and the
services of select non-employees, further align employee and stockholder
interests and closely link employee compensation with Company
performance. If approved, the 2009 Plan will provide an essential
component of the total compensation package offered to employees, reflecting the
importance that the Company places on motivating superior results with
long-term, performance-based incentives.
The 2009
Plan also reflects several compensation and governance best
practices. The 2009 Plan does not permit stock option re-pricing, the
use of discounted options, the reloading of option grants, or the adding back of
shares used to pay the exercise price of awards or to satisfy tax withholding
obligations. Additionally, the 2009 Plan limits the term on options
and stock appreciation rights to ten years, only allows the accelerated vesting
of awards upon the consummation of a change in control, and does not provide for
the grant of dividend equivalents. The 2009 Plan contains no
evergreen features which would provide for automatic replenishment of authorized
shares, limits the number of stock options and stock appreciation rights that
may be issued to any person in any fiscal year, other than those subject to
attainment of specified performance criteria, and limits the number of awards of
restricted stock or restricted stock units to 150,000 in any fiscal
year.
Key Terms
-
The following is a summary
of the material features of the 2009 Plan, which is qualified by reference to
the full text of the 2009 Plan, as set forth as Exhibit A:
Plan
Term:
|
|
March
2, 2009 to March 1, 2019.
|
|
|
|
Eligible
Participants:
|
|
Employees
of the Company (including employees who are also directors and prospective
employees conditioned on their becoming employees), non-employee
consultants or service providers and non-employee directors of the Company
as the Compensation Committee designates from time to time. The
Company has approximately 3,300 employees and 9 non-employee directors who
would be eligible to participate in the 2009 Plan.
|
|
|
|
Shares
Authorized:
|
|
1,350,000,
subject to adjustment only to reflect stock splits and similar events.
Awards that are forfeited, expire, cancelled or lapse become
available for future grants. Shares used to pay the exercise
price of a stock option and shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding
obligations will not be available for future grants. When a
stock settled stock appreciation right is exercised, the shares subject to
a stock appreciation right grant agreement will be counted against the
shares available for award as one share for every share subject thereto,
regardless of the number of shares used to settle the stock appreciation
right upon exercise.
|
Shares
Authorized as a Percent
of
Outstanding Common Stock:
|
|
5.8%
|
|
|
|
|
Award
Types:
|
|
(1)
|
Non-qualified and
incentive stock option
- the right to purchase a certain number of
shares of stock, at a certain exercise price, in the
future.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Restricted
stock
- share award conditioned upon continued employment, the
passage of time or the achievement of performance
objectives.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Restricted
stock unit
- the
right to receive the market price of a share of stock, in stock or cash,
in the
future.
|
|
(4)
|
Stock appreciation
right
- the right to receive the net of the market price of a share
of stock and the exercise price of the right, in stock, in the
future.
|
|
(5)
|
Stock bonus
- a
bonus payable in shares of
stock.
|
Award
Terms:
|
|
Stock
options and stock appreciation rights will have a term no longer than ten
years. All awards made under the 2009 Plan may be subject to vesting
and other contingencies as determined by the Compensation Committee and
will be evidenced by agreements which set forth the terms and conditions
of each award. The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may
accelerate or extend the period for the exercise or vesting of any
awards.
|
|
|
|
Shares
Authorized for Stock
Options
or Stock
Appreciation
Rights:
|
|
Maximum
of 1,350,000 shares issued as either non-qualified or incentive stock
options, or stock appreciation rights.
|
|
|
|
Shares
Authorized for
Restricted
Stock, Restricted
Stock
Units or Stock Bonuses:
|
|
Maximum
of 200,000 shares issued as either restricted stock, restricted stock
units or stock bonuses.
|
|
|
|
Vesting:
|
|
Determined
by the Compensation Committee, subject to exceptions in the event of a
change of control. Upon the consummation of an event constituting a
change in control of the Company as defined in the 2009 Plan, all awards
outstanding will become immediately vested.
|
|
|
|
Not
Permitted:
|
|
(1)
|
Granting
stock options or stock appreciation rights at a price below market price
on the date of grant. As of April 2, 2009, the closing price per
share of the Company's Common Stock was $19.84 per
share.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Repricing
of a stock option or stock appreciation right without stockholder
approval.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Granting
more than 150,000 shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units in
any fiscal year.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Granting
time-based stock options or stock appreciation rights to any one employee
during any fiscal year in excess of 100,000
shares.
|
Tax Consequences
–
Stock option grants
under the 2009 Plan may be intended to qualify as incentive stock options under
Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) §422 or may be non-qualified stock options
governed by IRC §83. Generally, no federal income tax is payable by a
participant upon the grant of a stock option and no deduction is taken by the
Company. Under current tax laws, if a participant exercises a
non-qualified stock option, he or she will have taxable income equal to the
difference between the market price of the stock on the exercise date and the
stock option grant price. The Company will be entitled to a corresponding
deduction on its income tax return. A participant will have no taxable
income upon exercising an incentive stock option if the shares received are held
for the applicable holding periods (except that alternative minimum tax may
apply), and the Company will receive no deduction when an incentive stock option
is exercised. The treatment for a participant of a disposition of shares
acquired through the exercise of an option depends on how long the shares were
held and on whether the shares were acquired by exercising an incentive stock
option or a non-qualified stock option. The Company may be entitled to a
deduction in the case of a disposition of shares acquired under an incentive
stock option that occurs before the applicable holding periods have been
satisfied.
Restricted
stock and restricted stock units are also governed by IRC §83. Generally,
no taxes are due when the award is made, but the award becomes taxable when it
is no longer subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture” (i.e., becomes vested
or transferable). Income tax is paid on the value of the stock or units at
ordinary rates when the restrictions lapse, and then at capital gains rates when
the shares are sold.
The grant
of a stock appreciation right will not result in income for the participant or
in a tax deduction for the Company. Upon the settlement of such a right,
the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the aggregate value of
the payment received, and the Company generally will be entitled to a tax
deduction in the same amount.
In
general, participants will recognize ordinary income upon the receipt of shares
or cash with respect to other awards granted under the 2009 Plan and the Company
will become entitled to a deduction at such time equal to the amount of income
recognized by the participant.
Awards
granted under the 2009 Plan may qualify as “performance-based compensation”
under IRC §162(m) in order to preserve federal income tax deductions by the
Company with respect to annual compensation required to be taken into account
under §162(m) that is in excess of $1 million and paid to one of the Company’s
most highly compensated executive officers. To qualify, options and other
awards must be granted under the 2009 Plan by a committee consisting of two or
more “outside directors” (as defined under §162(m)) and time-based options and
stock appreciation rights must satisfy the 2009 Plan’s limit on the total number
of shares that may be awarded to any one participant during any calendar
year. In addition, for awards other than time-based options and stock
appreciation rights to qualify, the grant, issuance, vesting or retention of the
award must be contingent upon satisfying one or more of the performance
criteria, as established and certified by a committee consisting solely of two
or more “outside directors.”
The
foregoing is only a summary of the effect of federal income taxation on the
participant and the Company under the 2009 Plan. It does not purport to be
complete and does not discuss the tax consequences arising in the context of a
participant's death or the income tax laws of any municipality, state or foreign
country in which the participant's income may be taxable.
Transferability
-
Awards granted under the
2009 Plan generally are not transferable except by will or the laws of descent
and distribution.
Administration
-
The Compensation Committee,
which is made up entirely of independent directors, will administer the 2009
Plan. The Compensation Committee will select the employees and
non-employees who receive awards, determine the number of shares covered
thereby, and, subject to the terms and limitations expressly set forth in the
2009 Plan, establish the terms, conditions and other provisions of the
grants. The Compensation Committee may interpret the 2009 Plan and
establish, amend and rescind any of its rules relating to the 2009 Plan, unless
expressly prohibited in the 2009 Plan.
A
mendments
-
The Board may, at any time, suspend or
terminate the 200
9
Plan or revise or amend it in any
respect whatsoever; provided, however, that stockholder approval shall be
required if and to the extent required by Rule 16b-3 or by any comparable or
s
uccessor exemption under
which the Board believes it is appropriate for the 200
9
Plan to qualify, or if and to the
extent the Board determines that such approval is appropriate for purposes of
satisfying IRC §
162(m)
, §
422 or §
409A or any applicable rule
o
r listing standard of any
stock exchange, automated quotation system or similar organization.
Nothing in the 200
9
Plan restricts the Compensation
Committee
’
s ability to exercise its discretionary
authority to administer the plan, which discretion may be e
xercised without amendment to the
200
9
Plan
.
No action may, without the consent of
a participant, reduce the participant's rights under any outstanding
grant.
Plan Awards
–
The Compensation Committee has approved
the Company’s 2009
Supplemental Annual Long-Term Incentive
Award Program award (the “2009 Awards”), subject to the approval of the 2009
Plan by the Company’s stockholders. The 2009 SALT Awards consisted of
319,851 non-qualified
stock options
with
an exercise price of $26.53
and were awarded
to senior managers of the
Company, includ
ing
the Named Executive
Officers
(as defined
below)
.
Vesting of the
2009 A
ward
s
is
dependent on whether or not the Company
achieves certain three-year performance measures.
The 2009
A
wards have a
market
value of $3.5 million as of the January
5, 2009 grant date. The following table sets forth the number and
grant date value of the
2009 Awards
:
|
|
Stock
Option Grants
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of Shares (#)
|
|
|
Grant Date Value ($)
|
|
Thomas
J. Hook
|
|
|
76,297
|
|
|
|
830,874
|
|
Thomas
J. Mazza
|
|
|
20,456
|
|
|
|
222,766
|
|
Mauricio
Arellano
|
|
|
15,985
|
|
|
|
174,077
|
|
Susan
M. Bratton
|
|
|
15,529
|
|
|
|
169,111
|
|
Susan
H. Campbell
|
|
|
15,985
|
|
|
|
174,077
|
|
Other
Senior Managers
|
|
|
175,599
|
|
|
|
1,912,273
|
|
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”
THE
APPROVAL OF THE ADOPTION OF THE GREATBATCH, INC. 2009 STOCK INCENTIVE
PLAN.
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The
following table provides information regarding the Company’s equity compensation
plans as of January 2, 2009:
Plan
Category
|
|
Number
of securities to be
issued
upon exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights or upon
vesting
of shares granted
under
restricted stock plan
|
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise
price
of outstanding
options,
warrants
and
rights;
Weighted-average
share
price
of restricted
stock
shares
granted
|
|
|
Number
of securities
remaining
available
for
future
issuance under
equity
compensation plans
(excluding
securities
reflected
in
column
(a))
|
|
|
|
( a
)
|
|
|
( b
)
|
|
|
( c
)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security
holders
(1)
|
|
|
2,296,858
|
|
|
$
|
24.05
|
|
|
|
436,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plan approved by security
holders
(2)
|
|
|
207,765
|
|
|
$
|
22.86
|
|
|
|
436,050
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,504,623
|
|
|
$
|
25.03
|
|
|
|
436,050
|
|
(1)
|
Consists
of stock options issued under the 1997 Stock Option Plan, 1998 Stock
Option Plan, Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan and the 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan.
|
(2)
|
Consists
of shares of restricted stock granted pursuant to the 2002 Restricted
Stock Plan and 2005 Stock Incentive
Plan.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Overview
The
compensation programs for our Executive Leadership Team, which includes all
of the Named Executive Officers, are designed to be consistent with
our compensation philosophy. Our philosophy is to provide senior
level managers with a compensation package that is both competitive and
encourages those executives to act in the best interest of our
stockholders. To achieve this, we design our compensation programs to
provide fixed cash and equity based compensation at the targeted competitive
market median rate and performance or “at risk” cash and equity based
compensation at above competitive market median rates if above competitive
market median performance is achieved. We believe that paying above
competitive market median compensation for above competitive market median
performance is important in order to attract, retain and properly incentivize
senior level management and should provide value to our shareholders through a
higher stock price, which should benefit from the higher level of
performance.
As
illustrated in the graphs below, we believe that performance and equity based
compensation should increase as a percentage of total direct compensation as
salary grade levels increase. The ratio of the President & Chief
Executive Officer’s and other Named Executive Officer’s total cash and direct
compensation is targeted to be consistent with the Company’s peer group of
companies. By following this philosophy, we believe we can attract
and retain executives who have the appropriate skill set to carry out our
strategic plans and attain both our short- and long-term financial and strategic
goals.
The
following graphs depict the mix of cash vs. equity of compensation granted to
our Named Executive Officers during 2008 assuming target level
performance:
The
following graphs depict the mix of time versus performance based compensation
granted to our Named Executive Officers during 2008 assuming target level
performance:
Our
compensation programs are designed by our Compensation Committee in
collaboration with management and approved by our Board. Our
compensation programs consist of the following cash and non-cash
components:
|
·
|
Long-Term
Equity Awards
|
|
·
|
Retirement
and Change in Control Agreements
|
|
·
|
Other
Personal Benefits
|
Other
than as discussed within this section, we do not believe the compensation for
our Named Executive Officers in 2009 will change materially from
2008.
Compensation
Committee Practices and Procedures
The
Compensation Committee, in collaboration with management, is responsible for the
design and administration of our compensation programs with appropriate approval
and general oversight from the Board. This responsibility includes
the determination of compensation levels and awards
provided. Historically, the Compensation Committee has directly
engaged Ernst & Young LLP to independently advise the Compensation Committee
on compensation matters. During 2008, Ernst & Young served as the
independent advisors to the Compensation Committee in matters of executive
compensation and benefits in response to recommendations made by
management. A representative of Ernst & Young was present in
person or by telephone for all seven of the meetings held by the Compensation
Committee during 2008.
The
Compensation Committee also is responsible for recommending to the Board for
approval the performance and merit adjustments for Mr. Hook, our President &
Chief Executive Officer. For the remaining Named Executive Officers,
Mr. Hook makes recommendations regarding performance and merit adjustments to
the Compensation Committee for approval. Grants of equity-based
compensation are recommended by management and approved by the Compensation
Committee in accordance with approved equity grant guidelines previously
established by the Compensation Committee with market data assistance from Ernst
& Young.
During
2008, Thomas J. Hook, President & Chief Executive Officer, Thomas J. Mazza,
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, Barbara M. Davis, Vice
President of Human Resources and Timothy G. McEvoy, Vice President, General
Counsel & Secretary, attended meetings of the Compensation Committee to
provide counsel and assistance to the Compensation Committee. These
executives were excused from meetings when items pertaining to their individual
compensation were discussed and for executive sessions of the
Committee.
Competitive
Market Review
As one
factor in considering approval of levels and elements of our compensation
programs, the Compensation Committee compares our compensation programs and
performance against an approved peer group of companies. The peer
group consists of fifteen publicly traded companies that are similar in size and
in similar industries as the Company and with whom we may compete for executive
talent. The Compensation Committee typically reevaluates the peer
group every two to three years or sooner if an event, such as an acquisition, no
longer makes the companies in the peer group comparable to the
Company.
The
companies comprising our compensation peer group, which was last updated in
2008, are:
CONMED
Corporation
|
|
ResMed
Inc.
|
CTS
Corporation
|
|
SonoSite,
Inc.
|
Datascope
Corporation
|
|
Symmetry
Medical, Inc.
|
DJO,
Inc.
|
|
Thoratec
Corporation
|
Edwards
Lifesciences Corp.
|
|
Vital
Signs, Inc.
|
Ev3,
Inc.
|
|
Wright
Medical Group, Inc.
|
Integra
LifeSciences Holdings Corp.
|
|
ZOLL
Medical Corporation
|
Merit
Medical Systems, Inc.
|
|
|
No
changes were made to our peer group for 2009. We believe that this is
an appropriate size for a peer group in order to obtain a representative sample
of our market and maintain a manageable level for analysis
purposes. We believe these companies (1) have relevant overlap with
our industry, customers and products, (2) are similar in size and (3) have key
metrics that are consistent with our high growth strategy. The key
metrics considered included revenue size and growth rate, earnings per share
(“EPS”) growth, average gross margins, enterprise value, EBITDA/enterprise value
and revenue/enterprise value.
Our total
compensation packages are based in part upon a 2008 market study performed by
Ernst & Young which utilized compensation peer group data supplemented by
market survey data and adjusted for factors such as prior individual performance
and expected future contributions, performance of the Company, internal equity
within our Company and the degree of difficulty in replacing the
individual. The 2008 market study, which provided base salary, total
cash compensation and total direct compensation analysis, was based upon proxy
data of our peer group and 2007 and 2008 survey data, trended to 2008, from the
following sources:
Title
|
|
Publisher
|
|
Year
|
Executive
Compensation Assessor
|
|
ERI
|
|
2008
|
U.S.
Executive Survey Report
|
|
Mercer
HR Consulting
|
|
2007
|
Top
Management Compensation Calculator
|
|
Watson
Wyatt Data Services
|
|
2007/2008
|
In
determining recommended compensation levels, the Ernst & Young analysis
utilized various analytical tools including total remuneration analysis, tally
sheets, internal pay equity analysis and equity wealth accumulation and
sensitivity analysis. In making final compensation decisions for
2008, the Compensation Committee considered all of theses
analyses. The Compensation Committee has determined that, absent a
meaningful change in circumstances, such tools should be utilized on a periodic,
as opposed to annual, basis.
The
Compensation Committee sets the performance goals for annual cash incentives and
long-term equity programs based upon the current year and long-range plan of the
Company. Our current year and long-range plan takes into
consideration the performance of our largest customers supplemented by
performance information for our peer group as well as relevant market
indices. We believe the performance of our largest customers should
be considered since they account for a large percentage of our
sales. Additionally, we believe broader market indices are
appropriate for consideration in establishing future performance metrics given
that the peer group companies above do not have businesses that are exactly
comparable to ours.
The
market indices considered include:
|
·
|
Medical
markets revenue growth rates as published by Bear Sterns, iData Research;
Lazard, Morgan Stanley, Thomas Weisel, Wachovia, and BMO;
and
|
|
·
|
Oil
& Gas Market Growth (as a proxy for our Electrochem Solutions
Segment).
|
Base
Salary
We want
to provide our Executive Leadership Team with a fixed level of cash compensation
in the form of base salary that is consistent with their skill level,
experience, knowledge, length of service with the Company and the level of
responsibility and complexity of their position. The target salary
for our Executive Leadership Team is based in part on the competitive market
median of our compensation peer group, supplemented by published survey data
(the “competitive market”). Our general practice is to be within 90%
to 110% of the competitive market median. In addition to the factors
listed above, actual base salaries may differ from the competitive market median
target as a result of various other factors including prior individual
performance and expected future contributions, performance of the Company,
internal equity within our Company and the degree of difficulty in replacing the
individual. Any such differences are approved by the Compensation
Committee and in the case of Mr. Hook, the Board. The base salaries
of senior level managers are reviewed by the Compensation Committee on an annual
basis, as well as at the time of promotion or significant changes in
responsibility. We expect the base salaries of our Named Executive
Officers to generally increase in-line with any increases to the median
competitive market rates.
The 2008
base salaries for our Named Executive Officers compared to the 2008 peer group
and competitive market median are as follows:
|
|
2008
Base Salary
|
|
|
%
of Competitive
Market Median
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Hook
|
|
$
|
475,000
|
|
|
|
104
|
%
|
Thomas
J. Mazza
|
|
|
262,200
|
|
|
|
106
|
%
|
Mauricio
Arellano
|
|
|
248,800
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
Susan
M. Bratton
|
|
|
241,700
|
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
Susan
H. Campbell
|
|
|
248,800
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
The 2009
base salaries for our Named Executive Officers are as follows:
|
|
2009
Base Salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Hook
|
|
$
|
491,600
|
|
Thomas
J. Mazza
|
|
|
271,500
|
|
Mauricio
Arellano
|
|
|
267,500
|
|
Susan
M. Bratton
|
|
|
250,200
|
|
Susan
H. Campbell
|
|
|
267,500
|
|
2009 base
salaries were increased by 3.5% from the 2008 levels. This is
consistent with the average merit budget applied across the Company’s U.S. based
organization. We believe this reflects the solid performance of the
Company during a year of internal integration and external financial market
turmoil as well as reasonable proxy for the competitive market increase during
2008 for companies with similar performance to ours. An additional
$10,000 increase was provided to the base salary of Mauricio Arellano and Susan
Campbell considering the increased size and complexity of the Cardiac &
Neurology and Orthopaedics Businesses during 2008. Our last market
review of salaries was performed in 2008. See Competitive Market
Review section above.
Annual
Cash Incentives
Overview
. The
payment of annual cash incentives is formula-based and is governed by our
Short-Term Incentive Compensation Program (“STIC Program”). The
objective of the STIC Program is to provide a target level of cash compensation
that is based upon the achievement of internal Company performance objectives
which take into consideration the competitive market median performance with the
opportunity for above median compensation for above median performance up to
65
th
to 75
th
percentile of the competitive market.
Employees
at the manager level and above are eligible to participate in our STIC
Program. STIC Program awards for the Executive Leadership Team are
based upon Company-wide performance goals. For all other levels, STIC
Program awards are primarily based upon a combination of the achievement of
specific individual operational goals and Company-wide
performance. As a result, this component of compensation can be
highly variable from year to year.
STIC
Program awards are calculated based upon the following formulas:
Total Available Award (TAA)
=
(Base Salary x Individual STIC %) x STIC Funding %
Actual Award
= ((TAA x 75%) x
Individual Performance %) + (TAA x 25%)
For
senior management of the Company, other than the Executive Leadership Team,
individual business unit and functional goals (Individual Performance %) impact
75% of the actual award and cannot exceed 100%. The remaining 25% of
the award is determined by the achievement of the Company performance target
(same as funding target). In general, the higher the salary grade of
an employee, the more the individual performance goals are based upon the
performance of the Company. The Executive Leadership Team’s
performance goals are based upon overall Company performance metrics (same as
funding target) and were 100% achieved for fiscal years 2006 to
2008.
STIC Funding
%
. Overall funding of the STIC Program is based upon a
Company-wide performance measure as recommended by the Compensation Committee
and approved by the Board at its first meeting of every year. This
measure is subject to adjustment based upon Compensation Committee-approved
unusual or extraordinary items that were not contemplated when the performance
measure was set.
Funding
of the STIC Program is calculated in accordance with the following
scale:
Achievement of Performance
Measure
|
|
Funding %
|
|
|
|
0%
- 74.9%
|
|
0%
|
75%
- 99.9%
|
|
50%
- 100%
|
100%
- 133%
|
|
100%
-
200%
|
This
funding model was designed to provide stockholders with a three-to-one payout
ratio compared to management. That is, for every four dollars earned
above the target, one dollar is paid in additional incentive compensation to
fund the STIC Program, up to the maximum threshold, and three dollars are
retained in the business and benefit stockholders.
For
fiscal years 2006 to 2008, the STIC Program funding performance measure was
adjusted earnings per share (“Adjusted EPS”). We selected Adjusted
EPS because of its direct correlation with the interests of our
stockholders. In establishing this measure, the Compensation
Committee considered the respective year’s budget, three-year compound annual
growth rate and how that growth rate compared to our competitive
market. Achievement at the 100% target level was deemed to be a
“realistic” goal and any amount greater than the target was believed to be a
“stretch” goal. As a result of stronger than expected financial
performance from 2006 to 2008, the STIC Program was funded as
follows:
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Adjusted
EPS Target
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
Adjusted
EPS Actual
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.47
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
STIC
Funding %
|
|
|
190
|
%
|
|
|
140
|
%
|
|
|
106
|
%
|
Adjusted
EPS and our EPS under generally accepted accounting principles differ primarily
as a result of the exclusion of non-recurring acquisition related charges
(mainly in-process research and development and inventory step-up amortization)
and costs incurred related to our consolidation initiatives, all of which were
not included in the original STIC target measures. All of these
adjustments were reviewed and approved by the Compensation
Committee.
Individual STIC
%
. Individual cash incentives are calculated by multiplying
the funding percentage by the individual’s target payout. The
individual target payout was determined by the Compensation Committee in order
to provide targeted total cash compensation (base salary + cash incentive) at
the median of our competitive market and between the 65
th
and
75
th
percentile of our competitive market for above competitive market median
performance.
The
target payout as a percentage of base salary for our Named Executive Officers is
as follows:
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
President & CEO
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
·
CFO
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
(2)
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
·
Other Named Executive Officers
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
%
(2)
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
In
2007, the Compensation Committee reduced the annual cash incentive target
payout percentages for certain senior level managers and increased the
level of equity based compensation. This was done to better
align the mix between cash and equity based compensation for our senior
managers with our competitive
market.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
a promotional increase.
|
Example Computation of 2008
STIC for Thomas J. Hook:
TAA
= (Base Salary ($475,000)
x Individual STIC % (80%)) x STIC Funding % (106%) = $402,800
STIC
Award
= (TAA ($402,800) x
Performance % (100%) = $402,800
(1)
|
(1)
|
The
difference between the actual STIC payment ($431,278) and the computed
payment above ($402,800) of $28,000 relates to the allocation given to all
STIC eligible employees in order to payout 100% of the STIC funding
pool. This allocation amounted to $14,000 for the CFO and
$12,000 for the other Named Executive Officers in
2008.
|
The STIC
Program for our Named Executive Officers was included in our 2007 proxy
statement and approved by our stockholders in order to meet the requirements for
an income tax deduction under IRC §162(m). Under IRC §162(m), a
limitation is placed on the tax deductibility of compensation to certain
executives of a publicly-held corporation that exceeds $1,000,000 in any taxable
year, unless the compensation meets certain requirements. Currently
our STIC Program is designed to meet these
requirements. Historically, our deductions for executive compensation
were not limited by IRC §162(m), except in isolated circumstances.
Long-Term
Equity Awards
Overview
. In
addition to cash incentives, we also compensate senior level managers, including
our Named Executive Officers, with long-term equity awards. These
awards are designed to align management’s performance with the interests of our
stockholders. Additionally, they are used as a recruiting and
retention tool for key managers. Historically, we granted equity
awards under various existing equity compensation plans, including the
following: (1) the 1997 Stock Option Plan; (2) the 1998 Stock Option Plan; (3)
the 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan; (4) the 2002 Restricted Stock
Plan; and (5) the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. The 1997 Stock Option
Plan, the 1998 Stock Option Plan, the 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Option
Plan, and the 2002 Restricted Stock Plan have all been frozen to new stock award
issuances.
As there
are only a nominal amount of shares available for grant under the 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan, a proposal has been submitted to stockholders in this proxy
statement to approve the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan which allows for the grant of
1,350,000 shares of stock based awards. The 2009 Plan was designed by the
Compensation Committee, with the assistance of management and Ernst &
Young. In determining the amount of shares under this plan and the
applicable sub-limits for restricted stock and restricted stock units, we
considered the historical burn-rate of the Company’s equity compensation plans,
the potential dilution and shareholder value transfer as a result of this plan
and current outstanding awards and the one year and three year total shareholder
return of the Company. These metrics were compared to our industry
and peer group and are often used by institutional investors when analyzing our
plans.
The award
of equity based compensation is both discretionary and formula-based as
described in the Long-Term Incentive Award Program (“LTIP Program”) and
Supplemental Annual Long-Term Incentive Award Program (“SALT Program”)
sections. The objective of the LTIP and SALT Programs is to provide
total direct compensation (total cash compensation + equity based compensation)
at the median of our competitive market and up to the 75
th
percentile of our competitive market for performance above the competitive
market median.
In
addition to LTIP and SALT Program awards, all managers and above are eligible
for equity awards at the time of hire, upon promotion and for special
recognition or significant changes in responsibility. Equity awards
issued for recognition or newly hired or newly promoted employees are typically
granted at the next scheduled Board meeting following the event
date.
Our
equity-based compensation plans and awards are designed and administered by the
Compensation Committee in collaboration with management and subject to the
approval of our Board. Historically, we have granted employees
equity-based compensation in the form of non-qualified and incentive stock
options and restricted stock. The LTIP and SALT Program awards are
generally issued before April of every year once performance targets for the
current and future years are determined. The Board typically meets
five times per year based upon a schedule determined several months in
advance. Accordingly, the proximity of any awards to earnings
announcements or the release of material non-public information would be
coincidental. All stock options are issued with strike prices that
are equal to the value of our closing stock price on the grant
date.
Except as
described in the “Employment Agreement” and “Executive Retirement Guidelines”
sections, all unvested stock-based awards expire upon death, disability,
termination by employee and termination by the Company, other than for cause.
Upon termination for cause, all outstanding stock-based awards expire
immediately. Upon death, disability, termination by employee and
termination by the Company, other than for cause, all vested stock-based awards
expire at various times, up to one year, based upon the termination reason and
the equity plan they were awarded from. In the event of a change in
control, all unvested time-based equity awards immediately vest. See
further discussion regarding change of control in the “Change in Control
Agreements” section.
We
believe that compensation from our stock options granted under the 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan are deductible and not limited by IRC §162(m). Our
deductions for restricted stock grants may be limited in the future under IRC
§162(m) primarily due to the timing of restricted stock vesting. The
Compensation Committee considers the potential non-deductibility of stock
incentive awards under IRC §162(m) when setting award levels. The Compensation
Committee believes that our equity programs are properly designed for the
retention of and incentivizing senior management, which is in the best interest
of shareholders even if IRC §162(m) limits are periodically exceeded and the tax
deductions are forfeited.
Time-Based
LTIP
Program
. The objective of the LTIP Program is to provide a
fixed level of equity-based compensation at the median of our competitive market
and adjusted for individual performance.
The 2008
LTIP Program awards were determined based upon the following
formula:
Total Available Award (TAA)
=
(Base Salary x Individual LTIP %)
Actual Award Payout (AAP)
=
TAA x Individual Performance %
Non-Qualified Stock Option
Grant
= (AAP x ½) ÷ Black-Scholes Value
(1)
Restricted Stock Grant
= (AAP
x ½) ÷ Closing Stock Price on Grant Date
(1)
|
We
utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value
of stock options granted for financial statement reporting purposes as
allowed under generally accepted accounting principles. See
Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
Item 8 of our Form 10K for fiscal year 2008 for further explanation of the
assumptions and methodology for determining the fair value of stock
options granted.
|
Individual LTIP
%
. The target grant of LTIP Program equity awards as a
percentage of base salary for our Named Executive Officers is as
follows. The target number of shares is calculated using the Black
Scholes value of our stock on the date of grant:
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
President & CEO
|
|
|
125
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
(2)
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
·
CFO
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
(2)
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
·
Other Named Executive Officers
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
(2)
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
In
2007, the Compensation Committee reduced the annual cash incentive target
payout percentages for certain senior level managers and increased the
level of equity based compensation. This was done to better
align the mix between cash and equity based compensation for our senior
managers with our competitive
market.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
a promotional increase.
|
The
actual amount of awards granted may differ from the target percentage as a
result of the consideration by the Compensation Committee of individual business
unit and functional goals (Individual Performance %). The individual
performance percentage that may be taken into account by the Compensation
Committee is the same individual performance percentage used to calculate annual
cash incentive awards under the STIC Program.
The 2006
and 2007 LTIP Program awards were granted in the form of non-qualified stock
options (one-half payout target) and restricted stock (one-half payout target)
with the restricted stock being converted on a 2.5 to 1 ratio. This
ratio was used as restricted stock was valued at approximately 2.5x the Black
Scholes value of our stock options and was intended to reflect the difference in
value between restricted stock and stock options. In order to
simplify the LTIP formula, in 2008 the 2.5 restricted stock ratio was removed
from the formula. The actual Greatbatch stock closing price on the
date of grant was used to compute the restricted stock portion of the
grant. The mix between stock options and restricted stock was
determined by the Compensation Committee in collaboration with management in
order to balance share ownership and potential future dilution to
stockholders.
Example Computation of 2008
LTIP for Thomas J. Hook:
TAA
= (Base Salary ($475,000)
x Individual LTIP % (150%)) = $712,500
AAP
= (TAA ($712,500) x
Individual Performance % (100%)) = $712,500
Non-Qualified Stock Option
Grant
= (AAP ($712,500) x ½) ÷ Black-Scholes Value ($8.38) = 42,511
(1)
Restricted Stock Grant
= (AAP
($712,500) x ½) ÷ Closing Stock Price on Grant Date ($20.14) = 17,689
(2)
(1)
|
The
difference between the actual LTIP stock option award (43,417) and the
computed award above (42,511) of 906 options relates to the allocation
given to all LTIP eligible employees in order to payout 100% of the LTIP
funding pool. This allocation amounted to less than 300 stock
options for the CFO and Other Named Executive Officers in
2008.
|
(2)
|
The
difference between the actual LTIP stock award (18,065) and the computed
award above (17,689) of 376 shares relates to the allocation given to all
LTIP eligible employees in order to payout 100% of the LTIP funding
pool. This allocation amounted to less than 110 shares for the
CFO and Other Named Executive Officers in
2008.
|
For 2009,
the Compensation Committee began granting restricted stock units to all
employees under the LTIP program in place of restricted stock, due to the tax
consequences upon the grant of restricted stock awards to employees in certain
foreign jurisdictions. In order to achieve uniformity with respect to
the timing of taxation for LTIP awards, the Committee chose restricted stock
units since they are not taxable in most jurisdictions until the vest date which
is similar to how restricted stock is taxed for U.S. employees.
LTIP
Program stock option awards vest over four years, 25% at the end of each year,
including the year of grant. The LTIP Program restricted stock or
restricted stock unit awards vest 50% at the end of the second year, including
the year of grant and 25% at the end of the third and fourth years.
Performance-Based
SALT
Program
. The objective of the SALT Program is to provide a
supplemental award that targets total direct compensation up to the 75
th
percentile of our competitive market if 75
th
percentile performance goals, set at the beginning of the period, are
met. This is consistent with our philosophy of providing above
competitive market median compensation for above competitive market median
performance. The use of SALT Program awards puts a larger percentage
of our Named Executive Officers pay in equity and “at risk,” which we believe is
appropriate and consistent with our compensation philosophy. SALT
Program awards are determined based upon the following formula and are granted
in the form of non-qualified stock options:
Non-Qualified Stock Option
Grant
= (Base Salary x Individual SALT %) ÷ Black Scholes
Value
Individual SALT
%
. The SALT Program equity awards expressed as a percentage of
base salary for our Named Executive Officers is as follows:
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
(1)
|
|
|
2008
(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
·
President
& CEO
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
125
|
%
(3)
|
|
|
175
|
%
|
|
|
175
|
%
|
·
CFO
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
85
|
%
(3)
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
·
Other
Named Executive Officers
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
(3)
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
In
2007, the Compensation Committee reduced the annual cash incentive target
payout percentages for certain senior level managers and increased the
level of equity based compensation. This was done to better
align the mix between cash and equity based compensation for our senior
managers with our competitive
market.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
an increase in order to bring total direct compensation up to the 75
th
percentile of the competitive
market.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
a promotional increase.
|
Example Computation of 2008
SALT for Thomas J. Hook:
Non-Qualified Stock Option
Grant
= (Base Salary ($475,000) x Individual SALT % (175%))
÷
Black
Scholes Value ($8.80) = 94,460
The
target number of shares is calculated using the Black Scholes value of our stock
on the grant date. SALT Program awards are granted in the form of
non-qualified stock options and are performance based. For the 2006
and 2007 SALT Programs, stock options vest either at 100% or 0% depending on
whether or not the Company achieves certain three-year performance
measures. In 2008, the SALT Program was modified to provide for pro
rata vesting relative to the achievement of the three performance metrics
utilized in the SALT program. This change was made as we found that
none of our peer group was in the top 25
th
percentile for all three metrics and only a few were in the top 25
th
percentile for two of the three metrics. Thus, we believe that
requiring upper quartile performance for all three metrics would not achieve our
objective of awarding 75
th
percentile total compensation for 75
th
percentile performance. Starting with the 2008 SALT grant, each
metric will be tracked independently and achievement of one or more will allow
for at least pro rata vesting of the award depending on how many of the metrics
are achieved and the lowest percentage achievement of the metric which was not
achieved. For example, if two of the performance goals are met and
the third metric was only 90% of the target, then 2/3 of the award multiplied by
90% will vest. Similarly, if only one of the performance goals is met
and the lowest percentage achieved of the other two metrics was 80% of the
target, then 1/3 of the award multiplied by 80% will vest.
The 2008
SALT Program awards performance measures were as follows:
|
·
|
2008
– 2010 cumulative revenue;
|
|
·
|
2008
– 2010 cumulative adjusted operating income;
and
|
|
·
|
2008
– 2010 cumulative adjusted cash flow provided by
operations.
|
The
Compensation Committee sets the performance goals for SALT awards based upon the
long-range financial plan of the Company. Our long range plan takes
into consideration the performance of our largest customers supplemented by
performance information for our peer group as well as relevant market
indices. We believe the performance of our largest customers should
be considered since they account for a large percentage of our sales.
Additionally, we believe broader market indices are appropriate for
consideration in establishing future performance metrics given that the peer
group companies above do not have businesses that are exactly comparable to
ours. These performance targets were set with the intent that they
would represent stretch goals and would result in superior upper quartile
performance relative to our customers and peers. Achievement of these
targets is believed to be a challenging goal for our
Company. Additionally, even after the targets are achieved they
continue to incentivize management since the award is in the form of stock
options. The only way an employee receives value from a stock option
is if the Company’s stock price, which is heavily dependent on the performance
of the Company, remains above the options’ exercise price. Thus,
stock options align the goals of management with those of the Company’s
shareholders.
These
performance measures are subject to adjustment based upon acquisitions, as well
as unusual or extraordinary items that were not contemplated when the
performance measures were set. The Compensation Committee approves
all adjustments. The adjustments for acquisitions are based upon the projections
for the respective acquisition at the time the transaction was approved by the
Board. We believe these adjustments provide incentive for senior
level managers to ensure acquisitions are successful. The original
2006 and 2007 SALT Program metrics were adjusted for the acquisitions we
completed in 2007 and 2008.
2008 was
the final performance year for the 2006 SALT award. During the three
year period from 2006 to 2008, we earned cumulative revenues of $1.14 billion,
cumulative adjusted operating income of $146 million and cumulative adjusted
cash flow provided by operations of $173 million. This compares to
the 2006 grant metrics of $1.13 billion, $139 million and $161 million,
respectively. Thus, in 2009 our Board approved the achievement of
these metrics. The awards will fully vest on December 31, 2009 if
continued employment is maintained up until that time. The difference
between the cumulative amounts for operating income and cash flow from
operations for the SALT metrics compared to the actual amounts under GAAP is the
exclusion of non-recurring acquisition related charges (mainly in-process
research and development and inventory step-up amortization) and costs incurred
related to our consolidation initiatives, all of which were not included in the
original SALT target. All of these adjustments were reviewed and
approved by the Compensation Committee.
2007 was
the final performance year for the 2005 SALT award. During the three
year period from 2005 to 2007, we earned cumulative revenues of $804 million and
cumulative Adjusted EPS of $3.83. This compares to the 2005 grant
metrics of $770 million and $3.51, respectively. Thus, in 2008 our
Board approved the achievement of these metrics. These awards fully
vested on December 31, 2008. The difference between the cumulative
revenue for the three year period from 2005 to 2007 and our revenues under GAAP
of $831 million is the exclusion of revenue for acquired companies which were
not included in the original SALT target. The main difference between
the Adjusted EPS and our EPS under GAAP is the exclusion of non-recurring
acquisition related charges (mainly in-process research and development and
inventory step-up amortization), costs incurred related to our consolidation
initiatives, and the gain on the extinguishment of our debt, all of which were
not included in the original SALT target. All of these adjustments
were reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee.
The form
of the SALT Program awards is reviewed annually by the Compensation
Committee. During 2008, the Compensation Committee researched the
need to incorporate either relative or absolute total shareholder return (“TSR”)
as a SALT Program metric. Based upon its analysis, including analysis
of our competitive market and peer group practices and in consultation with
Ernst & Young, the Compensation Committee determined that a change to TSR
was not appropriate at this time. This was based upon the fact that
TSR is highly sensitive to investor expectations and not necessarily performance
of the Company, TSR is often times out of management’s direct control and the
accounting for stock awards with market conditions such as TSR is more complex
and costly. Additionally, TSR has not yet become a widely accepted
compensation practice among publicly traded companies, including our peer
group. Based upon the 2007 NASPP Domestic Stock Plan Design and
Administration Survey, only 51 of the 349 companies (15%) evaluated utilize TSR
as a performance metric. Management and the Compensation Committee
remain committed to its pay for performance principals, evidence of which is
shown by the high percentage of Named Executive Officer Compensation that is
tied to the performance of the Company of approximately 50%.
Other Equity Based
Compensation
. In addition to the LTIP and SALT Programs,
senior level managers may receive additional equity based compensation at the
date of hire, upon promotion, for special recognition or upon a significant
change in responsibility. These awards are used as a recruiting and
retention tool. Historically, these grants were made in the form of
incentive stock options or restricted stock and were typically granted as a
percentage of the respective employee’s base salary. The amount of
incentive stock options granted that become exercisable in any one year by an
individual employee is subject to the $100,000 limit imposed by IRC
§422(d). In 2007, these awards were made in the form of non-qualified
stock options and restricted stock. Also during 2007, the Company’s
executive officers, except for the President and CEO who received a similar type
grant upon his promotion in 2006, received a one-time restricted stock grant
equal to 100% of their base salary. This grant will serve as an
additional retention tool for the executive officers as they vest over four
years (50% at the end of the second year and 25% at the end of the third and
fourth years).
Share Ownership
Guidelines
.
In order to
better align the interests of our executives with the interests of our
stockholders and to promote our commitment to sound corporate governance, the
Compensation Committee designed and the Board approved stock ownership
guidelines for senior level managers and non-employee
directors. These guidelines require non-employee directors to own at
least $90,000 in shares of the Company.
The
ownership requirement for our current Named Executive Officers is calculated as
a multiple of base salary as follows:
|
|
Multiple of Base Salary
|
|
President
& CEO
|
|
|
5.0
|
x
|
CFO
|
|
|
3.0
|
x
|
Other
Named Executive Officers
|
|
|
3.0
|
x
|
The
directors and executives are required to be in compliance with these guidelines
within 5 years of becoming subject to the policy and “meaningful” progress must
be made and is monitored throughout that time period.
The
ownership guidelines also contain a holding period requirement for equity based
awards. Non-employee directors are expected to hold all equity based
awards, net of applicable taxes, until their tenure as a Board member has
ended. Senior level managers are required to hold exercised stock
options and vested restricted stock/units, net of applicable taxes, for one year
following the exercise or vesting. For purposes of these guidelines,
a 50% tax rate is assumed.
Retirement
and Change in Control Agreements
Overview
. We
believe that it is in the best interest of our Company and stockholders to have
the unbiased dedication of our executives, without the distraction of personal
uncertainties such as retirement or a change in control. We have
designed our senior level managers’ retirement and other post-employment benefit
programs to reduce such distraction. We believe that our programs
allow for a smooth transition in the event of retirement or a change in control
without providing “windfall” benefits to senior level managers. We
also believe that these benefits are competitive with those of other comparable
companies.
The
components of our retirement and post-employment benefits program are as
follows:
|
·
|
Executive
Retirement Guidelines
|
|
·
|
Change
in Control Agreements
|
We do not
offer our employees defined benefit pension, post-retirement or deferred
compensation benefits. This decision was made as we believe that such
plans are both undervalued by employees and more expensive to administer in
comparison to the programs that we do offer. When designing our
retirement and other post-employment benefit programs we consider IRC §409A and
continue to evaluate our programs in light of the guidance issued under that
rule.
We
currently do not have a formal severance plan for our employees. In
the past, we have provided post-employment severance benefits to our employees
who are terminated in connection with a reduction-in-force or corporate
reorganization. Generally these benefit amounts are based upon length
of service and position level with the Company. Severance payments
are at the discretion of management.
Executive Retirement
Guidelines
. Higher-level senior managers who are at least 59½
with a combination of age and length of service equal to at least 69½ are
eligible to receive certain benefits under our Executive Retirement
Guidelines. These guidelines have been approved by our Board and
allow for the following:
|
a.
|
accelerated
vesting of all outstanding time-based stock incentive
awards;
|
|
b.
|
discretionary
vesting of all outstanding performance-based stock incentive awards;
and
|
|
c.
|
a
discretionary extension of the time eligible to exercise outstanding stock
options.
|
In
exchange for these benefits, the executives are required to sign a two-year
non-compete agreement. In order to be considered for these benefits,
executives must submit a voluntary retirement request form at least one year
prior to their anticipated retirement date and facilitate the transition of
their responsibilities to their successor. All requests for
retirement and benefits under our Executive Retirement Guidelines by Named
Executive Officers are reviewed and approved by our Board.
401(k)
Plan
. Nearly all of our employees are eligible to participate
in our defined contribution 401(k) plan. This plan provides for the
deferral of employee compensation up to the maximum IRC limit and a
discretionary Company match. From 2006 to 2008, this match was $0.35
per dollar of participant deferral, up to 6% of the base salary for each
participant.
In
addition to the discretionary contributions described above, employees are
eligible to receive an additional discretionary contribution of up to 5% of
their base salary to the 401(k) plan. This discretionary contribution
is made in the form of Common Stock and is subject to certain Internal Revenue
Service limits.
Each year
we perform standard year-end coverage, nondiscrimination and compliance testing
on our 401(k) plan to ensure compliance with applicable Internal Revenue Service
rules and regulations. In the event the plan does not meet the
nondiscrimination requirements, a prorated portion of the contributions made by
“highly compensated” employees will be returned to the respective employee in
order to ensure compliance.
Participants
immediately vest in their own contributions and earnings, and in the matching
and stock contributions made by the Company.
Change in Control
Agreements
. We have entered into change in control agreements
with our Named Executive Officers. These agreements provide for
continued employment with the same base salary, annual cash incentive and
benefits for two years following a change of control. If the employee
is terminated after the change of control, other than for death, disability or
cause, or the executive terminates the agreement for good reason, then the
executive will be entitled to certain benefits. The most significant
components of those benefits are as follows:
|
a.
|
two
times annual salary;
|
|
b.
|
two
times average bonus for the three year period prior to the date of
termination;
|
|
c.
|
two
times the Company’s 5% discretionary contributions to the Company’s 401(k)
Plan;
|
|
d.
|
$25,000
for outplacement services;
|
|
e.
|
continued
coverage under the Company’s medical and other benefit plans (i.e.
education assistance, financial planning, physicals) for a period of two
years; and
|
|
f.
|
all
time-based unvested equity awards immediately
vest.
|
Based
upon the hypothetical termination date of January 2, 2009, the change in control
termination benefits for our Named Executive Officers would be as
follows:
|
|
Salary
&
Bonus
|
|
|
Acceleration
of
Stock-
Based
Awards
(1)
|
|
|
Continuance
of
Benefits
(2)
|
|
|
401(k)
Plan
|
|
|
Outplace-
ment
Services
|
|
|
Tax
Gross-
Up
(3)(4)(5)
|
|
|
Modified
Cut-Back
(5)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Hook
|
|
$
|
2,128,947
|
|
|
$
|
2,573,287
|
|
|
$
|
68,993
|
|
|
$
|
23,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,038,807
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
5,858,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Mazza
|
|
|
1,075,126
|
|
|
|
457,964
|
|
|
|
128,182
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(49,002
|
)
|
|
|
1,660,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mauricio
Arellano
|
|
|
985,381
|
|
|
|
407,677
|
|
|
|
32,848
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(11,009
|
)
|
|
|
1,462,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan
M. Bratton
|
|
|
981,447
|
|
|
|
392,438
|
|
|
|
165,987
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,587,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan
H. Campbell
|
|
|
995,647
|
|
|
|
405,311
|
|
|
|
28,045
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,477,003
|
|
(1)
|
Based
upon our closing stock price of $26.72 per share as of January 2,
2009.
|
(2)
|
Includes
the continuation of all benefits described in the Other Personal Benefits
section below.
|
(3)
|
Computed
based upon the assumption that equity awards are paid out in cash and does
not consider the value that could be assigned to the non-compete agreement
signed by Thomas J. Hook.
|
(4)
|
It
is assumed that the hypothetical transaction would result in a cash-out of
the outstanding equity awards. In the event an actual
transaction would occur in which equity awards were converted into equity
awards of the buyer, then the value of the equity acceleration for tax
purposes could be higher.
|
(5)
|
Our
change in control agreements provide that an executive is not entitled to
a gross-up if the present value of payments does not exceed 110% of the
safe harbor threshold. Instead, the payments due to these
executives would be reduced to the maximum that could be paid so that the
value of the payment would not exceed the safe harbor
threshold. To the extent the change in control parachute
payment exceeds 110% of the safe harbor threshold, then the participant
would be entitled to an excise tax gross-up payment, which is included in
the amounts shown above.
|
In
exchange for the above, the terminated executive is required to sign a 36-month
confidentiality agreement. In designing these agreements, we
considered IRC §280G. IRC §280G denies a tax deduction for any and
all excess parachute payments for corporations undergoing a change in
control. In addition, the individual recipient of such payment must
pay an extra 20% excise tax on the amount of the payment. IRC §280G
provides a safe harbor from this excise tax if the present value of any
parachute payments under a change in control does not exceed certain thresholds
as defined in the IRC.
Other
Personal Benefits
In
addition to the elements of compensation discussed above, we also provide senior
level managers with various other benefits as follows:
|
·
|
Executive
Financial Planning
|
We
provide these benefits in order to remain competitive with the market and
believe that these benefits help us to attract and retain qualified
executives. These benefits also reduce the amount of time and
attention that senior level managers must spend on personal matters and allow
them to dedicate more time to our Company. We believe that these
benefits are in-line with the market, are reasonable in nature, are not
excessive and are in the best interest of our Company and its
stockholders.
Education
Assistance
. All employees and their dependents are eligible to
participate in our Education Assistance Program. This program is
provided to support our innovation and commitment to improving our
abilities. We believe that education will support the development of
our employees for new positions and enhance their contributions to the
achievement of our strategic goals. This program was pioneered by our
founder, Wilson Greatbatch, who believed as we do that “education is always
worth more than it costs in time, money and effort.”
Under our
Education Assistance Program we reimburse tuition, textbooks and laboratory fees
for all of our employees and their dependents. All fulltime employees
are eligible for 100% reimbursement upon the successful completion of job
related courses or degree program. The dependent children benefit
vests on a straight-line basis over ten years. For employees hired
after January 1, 2003, the maximum amount of dependent children reimbursable
tuition is the cost of tuition at the recognized local state
university. For employees hired prior to January 1, 2003 and for all
of the Named Executive Officers, there is no maximum limit for dependent
children reimbursement. Minimum academic achievement is required in
order to receive reimbursement under all Education Assistance
Programs. In 2008, Thomas J. Mazza and Susan M. Bratton were the only
Named Executive Officers who received benefits under this program.
Life
Insurance
. Beginning in 2008, our executive officers receive
term life insurance paid by the Company equal to $5 million for the President
& CEO (consistent with prior years) and $1 million for other executive
officers. Additionally, the Company reimburses the executive officers for
any additional tax burden resulting from this benefit. We believe
this benefit is consistent with and will allow us to remain competitive with the
market and believe that these benefits help us to attract and retain qualified
executives.
Long-Term
Disability
. Beginning in 2008, our executive officers receive
long-term disability insurance paid by the Company equal to 60% of salary plus
STIC at the 100% level, with no cap. Additionally, the Company
reimburses the executive officers for any additional tax burden resulting from
this benefit. We believe this benefit is consistent with and will
allow us to remain competitive with the market and believe that these benefits
help us to attract and retain qualified executives.
Executive Financial
Planning
. Senior level managers are eligible for reimbursement
of financial planning services. Reimbursement is approved for dollar
amounts up to $5,000 in the first year of the program and up to $2,500 in all
other years ($3,000 for the President & CEO). Qualified expenses
include income tax preparation, estate planning and investment planning, among
others.
Executive
Physical
. We provide senior level managers with annual
physicals. We cover 100% of the cost of this program. This
program was developed to promote the physical well being and health of our
senior level managers. We believe this program is in the best
long-term interest of our stockholders.
Other
Benefits
. Senior level managers also participate in other
benefit plans that we fully or partially subsidize. Their
participation is on the same terms as other employees of the
Company. Some of the more significant of these benefits include
medical, dental and vision insurance, as well as relocation reimbursement and
vacation.
Employment
Agreements
The
Company has entered into an employment agreement with Thomas J.
Hook. No other Named Executive Officer has an employment
agreement.
We
entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Hook in order to secure his
services upon his appointment as President & Chief Executive
Officer. That agreement provides certain benefits in addition to the
other benefits discussed elsewhere in this section as follows:
|
a.
|
Term
extends through December 31, 2009 with automatic 1 year renewals after
that;
|
|
b.
|
Grant
of 25,000 shares of non-qualified options and 50,000 shares of restricted
stock that vest 25% on December 31, 2008, 25% on December 31, 2009 and 50%
on December 31, 2010;
|
|
c.
|
Company
financed term life insurance policy of at least $5 million in face
value;
|
|
d.
|
In
the event of death or disability – i) salary and fringe benefit
continuation through the term of the contract or one year whichever is
longer; and ii) immediate vesting of all non-vested equity based awards,
except SALT awards;
|
|
e.
|
In
the event of termination without cause or with good reason – i) one year
salary and STIC incentive payment; and ii) immediate vesting of all
non-vested equity based awards, except SALT awards. Right to exercise
vested options upon termination is extended to twelve months;
and
|
|
f.
|
Non-compete
agreement during the term of the contract and 24 months from the date of
last payment under the contract.
|
The
following table presents the benefits that would be received by Mr. Hook in the
event of a hypothetical termination as of January 2, 2009 as
follows:
|
|
Salary
&
Bonus
|
|
|
Acceleration
of Stock-
Based
Awards
(1)
|
|
|
Continuance
of
Benefits
|
|
|
401(k)
Plan
|
|
|
Tax &
Financial
Planning
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent
Disability
|
|
$
|
475,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,573,287
|
|
|
$
|
31,497
|
|
|
$
|
11,500
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,094,284
|
|
Death
|
|
|
475,000
|
|
|
|
2,573,287
|
|
|
|
9,752
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,058,039
|
|
Termination
Without Cause
|
|
|
855,000
|
|
|
|
2,573,287
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,428,287
|
|
Termination
With Good Reason
|
|
|
855,000
|
|
|
|
2,573,287
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,428,287
|
|
Termination
for Cause
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Termination
Without Good Reason
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,573,287
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,573,287
|
|
(1)
|
Based
upon our closing stock price of $26.72 per share as of January 2,
2009.
|
Compensation
and Organization Committee Report
The
Compensation and Organization Committee has reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis appearing in this document with management
and based upon this review and discussion recommended to the Board that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement for
filing with the SEC.
Respectively
submitted,
|
|
Pamela
G. Bailey
|
Michael
Dinkins
|
Peter
H. Soderberg
|
William
B. Summers, Jr. (Chair)
|
|
Members of the Compensation and Organization Committee
|
Compensation
Tables
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following table summarizes the total compensation paid or earned by each of the
Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2008, 2007 and 2006. We have
entered into an employment agreement with Thomas J. Hook – see the “Employment
Agreements” section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for further
discussion. The Named Executive Officers were not entitled to receive
payments which would be characterized as “Bonus” payments for fiscal year 2008,
2007 or 2006. Total cash compensation, which includes salary and
non-equity incentive plan compensation, is based on individual performance as
well as on the overall performance of the Company as more fully described in the
“Base Salary” and “Annual Cash Incentives” sections of the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis. Generally, the emphasis that is placed on
stock-based compensation increases as the level of responsibility of the
individual employee increases.
Name and
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
|
|
|
All
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
(1)
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
(2)
|
|
|
Awards
(3)
|
|
|
Comp.
(4)
|
|
|
Comp.
(5)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Hook
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
475,000
|
|
$
|
─
|
|
$
|
489,163
|
|
|
$
|
875,015
|
|
|
$
|
431,278
|
|
|
$
|
50,778
|
|
|
$
|
2,321,234
|
|
President
&
|
|
2007
|
|
|
448,231
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
439,586
|
|
|
|
639,882
|
|
|
|
527,421
|
|
|
|
41,511
|
|
|
|
2,096,631
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
2006
|
|
|
378,558
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
168,377
|
|
|
|
356,264
|
|
|
|
646,000
|
|
|
|
49,494
|
|
|
|
1,598,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Mazza
|
|
2008
|
|
|
262,200
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
163,841
|
|
|
|
200,379
|
|
|
|
208,307
|
|
|
|
91,019
|
|
|
|
925,746
|
|
Senior
Vice President &
|
|
2007
|
|
|
247,962
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
92,211
|
|
|
|
147,074
|
|
|
|
242,089
|
|
|
|
76,005
|
|
|
|
805,341
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
2006
|
|
|
215,654
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
20,041
|
|
|
|
112,028
|
|
|
|
292,600
|
|
|
|
40,077
|
|
|
|
680,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mauricio
Arellano
|
|
2008
|
|
|
248,800
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
149,413
|
|
|
|
192,045
|
|
|
|
183,543
|
|
|
|
30,864
|
|
|
|
804,665
|
|
Senior
Vice President,
|
|
2007
|
|
|
228,962
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
85,708
|
|
|
|
143,794
|
|
|
|
223,161
|
|
|
|
76,079
|
|
|
|
757,704
|
|
Cardiac
& Neurology
|
|
2006
|
|
|
201,808
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
19,570
|
|
|
|
94,480
|
|
|
|
254,410
|
|
|
|
27,109
|
|
|
|
597,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan
M. Bratton
|
|
2008
|
|
|
241,700
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
147,630
|
|
|
|
171,419
|
|
|
|
178,305
|
|
|
|
92,694
|
|
|
|
831,748
|
|
Senior
Vice President,
|
|
2007
|
|
|
228,962
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
86,377
|
|
|
|
120,340
|
|
|
|
223,161
|
|
|
|
72,132
|
|
|
|
730,972
|
|
Commercial
|
|
2006
|
|
|
205,769
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
22,105
|
|
|
|
90,602
|
|
|
|
254,410
|
|
|
|
70,693
|
|
|
|
643,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan
H. Campbell
|
|
2008
|
|
|
248,800
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
149,313
|
|
|
|
176,478
|
|
|
|
183,543
|
|
|
|
21,788
|
|
|
|
779,922
|
|
Senior
Vice President,
|
|
2007
|
|
|
228,962
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
87,484
|
|
|
|
131,163
|
|
|
|
223,161
|
|
|
|
15,975
|
|
|
|
686,745
|
|
Orthopaedics
|
|
2006
|
|
|
205,769
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
21,373
|
|
|
|
98,526
|
|
|
|
254,410
|
|
|
|
14,766
|
|
|
|
594,844
|
|
(1)
|
The
amounts indicated represent the dollar value of base salary earned during
fiscal year 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
(2)
|
The
amounts indicated represent the aggregate dollar amount of compensation
expense related to restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards
granted that was recognized in our financial statements. The
determination of this expense is based on the methodology set forth in
notes 1 and 10 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on March 3,
2009.
|
(3)
|
The
amounts indicated represent the aggregate dollar amount of compensation
expense related to stock option awards granted that was recognized in our
financial statements. The determination of this expense is based on
the methodology set forth in notes 1 and 10 to our financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC
on March 3, 2009.
|
(4)
|
The
amounts indicated represent cash awards earned in the indicated fiscal
year and paid in the subsequent fiscal year under our STIC Program.
See “Annual Cash Incentives” section of the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis for a discussion of this
program.
|
(5)
|
The
amounts indicated include cash and stock we contributed to the respective
employees’ 401(k) plan account, term life insurance premiums paid by the
Company for the benefit of the Named Executive Officers, tax gross-ups
related to term life insurance and long-term disability benefits, as well
as other compensation. The dollar value of cash and stock
contributed to the 401(k) plan, term life insurance premiums paid, tax
gross-ups, perquisites for items in excess of $10,000 and all other is as
follows:
|
|
Year
|
|
401
(k)
Contribution
|
|
|
Term
Life
Insurance
Premiums
|
|
|
Tax
Gross-Up
|
|
|
Perquisites
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Hook
|
2008
|
|
$
|
16,225
|
|
|
$
|
13,250
|
|
|
$
|
10,802
|
|
|
$
|
─
|
|
|
$
|
10,501
|
|
|
$
|
50,778
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
15,956
|
|
|
|
12,900
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
12,655
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
41,511
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
14,975
|
|
|
|
12,900
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
21,492
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
49,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. Mazza
(1)
|
2008
|
|
|
16,225
|
|
|
|
5,780
|
|
|
|
3,922
|
|
|
|
49,980
|
|
|
|
15,112
|
|
|
|
91,019
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
15,975
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
52,817
|
|
|
|
7,213
|
|
|
|
76,005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
15,512
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
22,273
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
40,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mauricio Arellano
(2)
|
2008
|
|
|
14,483
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
11,841
|
|
|
|
30,864
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
15,975
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
47,635
|
|
|
|
12,469
|
|
|
|
76,079
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
14,405
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
12,473
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
27,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan
M. Bratton
|
2008
|
|
|
16,225
|
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
71,651
|
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
|
|
92,694
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
15,975
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
56,157
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
72,132
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
14,633
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
|
|
54,949
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
70,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan
H. Campbell
|
2008
|
|
|
16,225
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
2,703
|
|
|
|
21,788
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
15,975
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
15,975
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
14,610
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
14,766
|
|
(1)
|
Other
compensation for 2008 includes $13,210 related to the payment of excess
vacation in accordance with Company
policy.
|
(2)
|
Other
compensation for 2007 includes $12,469 related to the payment of excess
vacation in accordance with Company
policy.
|
Perquisites
for the Named Executive Officers are included in “All Other Compensation” if the
aggregate value is equal to or greater than $10,000. The perquisites
included were comprised of the following. No perquisite exceeded the
greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total perquisites provided to the respective
executive, except as noted:
|
Year
|
|
Car
Allowance
(1)
|
|
|
Financial
Planning
|
|
|
Executive
Physical
|
|
|
Dependent
Education
Assistance
(2)
|
|
|
Relocation
|
|
|
Service
Awards/
Gifts
|
|
|
Personal
Travel
|
|
|
Personal
use
of
Company
Provided
Cell-Phone
|
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
Thomas
J. Hook
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Mazza
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
44,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mauricio
Arellano
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,353
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan
M. Bratton
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
48,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan
H. Campbell
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
This
benefit was discontinued in March
2007.
|
(2)
|
Includes
reimbursement for tuition, textbooks and laboratory fees for the Named
Executive Officer and their dependents. See “Education Assistance” section
of the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis.
|
2008
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The
following table summarizes the grants of plan-based awards to each of the Named
Executive Officers during fiscal year 2008. All stock-based
awards in 2008 were granted under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. Under the
2005 Stock Incentive Plan, all stock options expire 10 years from the date of
grant and acceleration of vesting occurs for time-based awards upon a change in
control. Acceleration of vesting does not automatically occur upon death,
disability or retirement.
Prior to
vesting, employees who receive a grant of restricted stock are eligible to
participate in the rights or privileges of a stockholder of the Company in
respect to those shares, including the right to receive dividends and
vote. We did not pay any cash dividends in 2008 and currently intend
to retain all earnings to further develop and grow our business.
|
|
|
Estimated
Future Payouts Under
Non-
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards
(1)
|
|
|
Estimated
Future Payouts
Under
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards
(2)
|
|
|
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of
|
|
|
All
Other
Option
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
of
|
|
|
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of
Stock
and
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Stock
or
Units
|
|
|
Underlying
Options
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
|
Option
Awards
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
|
(#)
(3)
|
|
|
|
(#)
(3)
|
|
|
($/Sh)
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Hook
|
|
|
$
|
190,000
|
|
|
$
|
380,000
|
|
|
$
|
760,000
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
$
|
─
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
18,065
|
|
|
|
43,417
|
|
|
|
20.14
|
|
|
|
727,663
|
|
|
10/13/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
31,487
|
|
|
|
94,460
|
|
|
|
94,460
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
21.88
|
|
|
|
831,248
|
|
Thomas
J. Mazza
|
|
|
|
91,770
|
|
|
|
183,540
|
|
|
|
367,080
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
5,318
|
|
|
|
12,781
|
|
|
|
20.14
|
|
|
|
214,210
|
|
|
10/13/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
8,442
|
|
|
|
25,325
|
|
|
|
25,325
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
21.88
|
|
|
|
222,860
|
|
Mauricio
Arellano
|
|
|
|
80,860
|
|
|
|
161,720
|
|
|
|
323,440
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
4,415
|
|
|
|
10,611
|
|
|
|
20.14
|
|
|
|
177,838
|
|
|
10/13/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
6,596
|
|
|
|
19,788
|
|
|
|
19,788
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
21.88
|
|
|
|
174,134
|
|
Susan
M. Bratton
|
|
|
|
78,553
|
|
|
|
157,105
|
|
|
|
314,210
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
4,289
|
|
|
|
10,309
|
|
|
|
20.14
|
|
|
|
172,769
|
|
|
10/13/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
6,408
|
|
|
|
19,225
|
|
|
|
19,225
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
21.88
|
|
|
|
169,180
|
|
Susan
H. Campbell
|
|
|
|
80,860
|
|
|
|
161,720
|
|
|
|
323,440
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
4,415
|
|
|
|
10,611
|
|
|
|
20.14
|
|
|
|
177,838
|
|
|
10/13/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
6,596
|
|
|
|
19,788
|
|
|
|
19,788
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
21.88
|
|
|
|
174,134
|
|
(1)
|
The
amounts indicated represent potential cash awards that could be paid under
our STIC Program. Awards can range from 50% to 200% of the
target amount if 75% to 133% of the performance metric is achieved,
respectively. Award would be $0 if threshold target is not
achieved. See “Annual Cash Incentives” section of the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis for discussion of this program. See the
“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Comp.
”
column of the Summary Compensation Table above for the actual
amounts earned in 2008, which were paid in
2009.
|
(2)
|
The
amounts indicated represent performance-based non-qualified stock options
that were awarded under our SALT Program. The 2008 SALT Program
awards vest on December 31, 2010 depending on whether or not the Company
achieves certain three-year performance measures. See the
“Long-Term Equity Awards – Performance-Based” section of the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis for discussion of this
program.
|
(3)
|
The
amounts indicated represent non-qualified stock option and restricted
stock awards that were granted under our LTIP Program. The LTIP
Program stock option awards vest 25% at the end of each year, including
the year of grant. The LTIP Program restricted stock awards
vest 50% at the end of the second year, including the year of grant and
25% at the end of the third and fourth year. See the “Long-Term
Equity Awards – Time-Based” section of the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis for discussion of this
program.
|
(4)
|
The
valuation of stock options and restricted stock are based on the
methodology set forth in notes 1 and 10 to our financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC
on March 3, 2009.
|
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2008 Fiscal Year-End
The
following table summarizes the number and terms of stock option and restricted
stock awards outstanding for each of the Named Executive Officers as of January
2, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Option
Grant
Date
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
Stock
Award
Grant
Date
|
|
Number
of
Shares
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
|
|
|
Market
Value
of
Shares of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(4)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#)
(1)
|
|
|
|
(#)
(1)
|
|
|
|
(#)
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#)
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
Thomas
J. Hook
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2004
|
|
|
39,558
|
|
|
|
10,442
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
$
|
16.70
|
|
8/31/2014
|
10/5/2004
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
133,600
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
|
18,742
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
18.24
|
|
3/30/2015
|
2/11/2005
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
187,040
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
5/24/2005
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
24.62
|
|
5/23/2015
|
2/12/2006
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
|
|
33,721
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
6/8/2005
|
|
|
25,431
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
23.60
|
|
6/7/2015
|
8/8/2006
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
1,002,000
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
2/12/2006
|
|
|
18,918
|
|
|
|
6,307
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
25.22
|
|
2/11/2016
|
3/6/2007
|
|
|
6,296
|
|
|
|
168,229
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
8/8/2006
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
18,750
|
|
|
|
41,996
|
|
|
|
22.38
|
|
8/7/2016
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
18,065
|
|
|
|
482,697
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/6/2007
|
|
|
15,740
|
|
|
|
15,741
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
25.50
|
|
3/5/2017
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
5/22/2007
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
37,920
|
|
|
|
29.65
|
|
5/21/2017
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
10,854
|
|
|
|
32,563
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
20.14
|
|
3/3/2018
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
10/13/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
94,460
|
|
|
|
21.88
|
|
10/12/2018
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Mazza
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2003
|
|
|
4,665
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
$
|
37.51
|
|
11/9/2013
|
10/1/2004
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
5,344
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
7/1/2004
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
27.50
|
|
6/30/2014
|
2/12/2006
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
12,131
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
2/11/2005
|
|
|
3,220
|
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
16.99
|
|
2/10/2015
|
3/6/2007
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
|
43,527
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
|
7,074
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
18.24
|
|
3/30/2015
|
5/22/2007
|
|
|
4,804
|
|
|
|
128,363
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
6/8/2005
|
|
|
6,684
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
23.60
|
|
6/7/2015
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
5,318
|
|
|
|
142,097
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
2/12/2006
|
|
|
6,810
|
|
|
|
2,271
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
25.22
|
|
2/11/2016
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
8/8/2006
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
8,695
|
|
|
|
22.38
|
|
8/7/2016
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/6/2007
|
|
|
4,071
|
|
|
|
4,072
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
25.50
|
|
3/5/2017
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
5/22/2007
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
8,407
|
|
|
|
29.65
|
|
5/21/2017
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
3,195
|
|
|
|
9,586
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
20.14
|
|
3/3/2018
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
10/13/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
25,325
|
|
|
|
21.88
|
|
10/12/2018
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mauricio Arellano
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2003
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
$
|
37.51
|
|
11/9/2013
|
10/1/2004
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
26,720
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
5/25/2004
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
26.65
|
|
5/24/2014
|
2/12/2006
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
9,993
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
7/1/2004
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
27.50
|
|
6/30/2014
|
3/6/2007
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
39,973
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
|
6,535
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
18.24
|
|
3/30/2015
|
5/22/2007
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
117,889
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
6/8/2005
|
|
|
6,176
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
23.60
|
|
6/7/2015
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
4,415
|
|
|
|
117,969
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
2/12/2006
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
25.22
|
|
2/11/2016
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
8/8/2006
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
8,142
|
|
|
|
22.38
|
|
8/7/2016
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/6/2007
|
|
|
3,739
|
|
|
|
3,739
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
25.50
|
|
3/5/2017
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
5/22/2007
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
3,036
|
|
|
|
7,721
|
|
|
|
29.65
|
|
5/21/2017
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
2,652
|
|
|
|
7,959
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
20.14
|
|
3/3/2018
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
10/13/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
19,788
|
|
|
|
21.88
|
|
10/12/2018
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Option
Grant
Date
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
Stock
Award
Grant
Date
|
|
Number
of
Shares
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
|
|
|
Market
Value
of
Shares
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(4)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#)
(1)
|
|
|
|
(#)
(1)
|
|
|
|
(#)
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#)
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
Susan
M. Bratton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/24/1999
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
9/23/2009
|
11/15/2002
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
5,344
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
1/1/2000
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
12/31/2009
|
11/1/2003
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
5,344
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
2/16/2000
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
2/15/2010
|
10/1/2004
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
5,344
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
1/1/2001
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
28.25
|
|
12/31/2010
|
2/12/2006
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
10,287
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
2/5/2001
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
20.64
|
|
2/4/2011
|
3/6/2007
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
39,973
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
5/18/2001
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
32.48
|
|
5/17/2011
|
5/22/2007
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
117,889
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
1/1/2002
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
25.82
|
|
12/31/2011
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
4,289
|
|
|
|
114,602
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
7/26/2002
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
25.36
|
|
7/25/2012
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
7/1/2003
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
35.70
|
|
6/30/2013
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
7/1/2004
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
27.50
|
|
6/30/2014
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
|
7,112
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
18.24
|
|
3/30/2015
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
6/8/2005
|
|
|
6,721
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
23.60
|
|
6/7/2015
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
2/12/2006
|
|
|
5,764
|
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
25.22
|
|
2/11/2016
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
8/8/2006
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
8,142
|
|
|
|
22.38
|
|
8/7/2016
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/6/2007
|
|
|
3,739
|
|
|
|
3,739
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
25.50
|
|
3/5/2017
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
5/22/2007
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
7,721
|
|
|
|
29.65
|
|
5/21/2017
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
2,577
|
|
|
|
7,732
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
20.14
|
|
3/3/2018
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
10/13/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
19,225
|
|
|
|
21.88
|
|
10/12/2018
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan H. Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/9/2003
|
|
|
3,552
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
$
|
33.78
|
|
5/8/2013
|
11/1/2003
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
5,344
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
7/1/2003
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
35.70
|
|
6/30/2013
|
10/1/2004
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
18,704
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
7/1/2004
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
27.50
|
|
6/30/2014
|
2/12/2006
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
10,287
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
10/5/2004
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
17.77
|
|
10/4/2014
|
3/6/2007
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
39,973
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
|
6,920
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
18.24
|
|
3/30/2015
|
5/22/2007
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
117,889
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
6/8/2005
|
|
|
6,539
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
23.60
|
|
6/7/2015
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
4,415
|
|
|
|
117,969
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
2/12/2006
|
|
|
5,764
|
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
25.22
|
|
2/11/2016
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
8/8/2006
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
8,142
|
|
|
|
22.38
|
|
8/7/2016
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/6/2007
|
|
|
3,739
|
|
|
|
3,739
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
25.50
|
|
3/5/2017
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
5/22/2007
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
7,721
|
|
|
|
29.65
|
|
5/21/2017
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
2,652
|
|
|
|
7,959
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
20.14
|
|
3/3/2018
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
10/13/2008
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
19,788
|
|
|
|
21.88
|
|
10/12/2018
|
─
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
(1)
|
Stock
option awards become exercisable as
follows:
|
Option Grant Date
|
|
Vesting Schedule
|
5/18/01,
5/9/03, 11/10/03, 5/25/04, 9/1/04, 2/11/05, 5/24/05
|
|
See
Other Equity Based Compensation discussion within the “Long-Term Equity
Awards” section of the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis. The amount of stock options exercisable is determined
each year by the Compensation Committee and is based upon the financial
performance of the Company for the preceding
year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the option becomes
exercisable in full on the seventh anniversary of the grant date if
employment with the Company has not terminated. The historical
vesting of these awards is as follows: 2001 – 26.9%; 2002 – 15.1%;
2003 – 24.4%; 2004 – 15.6%; 2005 – 24.4%; 2006 24.0%; 2007 16.0% and 2008
20%.
|
5/22/07
|
|
See
Other Equity Based Compensation discussion within the “Long-Term Equity
Awards” section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The
amount of stock options exercisable is determined each year by the
Compensation Committee and is based upon the financial performance of the
Company for the preceding year. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
the option becomes exercisable in full on the seventh anniversary of the
grant date if employment with the Company has not
terminated. The historical vesting of these awards is as
follows: 2007 – 20.0% and 2008 – 20.0%.
|
|
|
|
1/1/00,
1/1/01, 1/1/02
|
|
Stock
options become exercisable 33 1/3% on the anniversary of the grant date
each year for three years following the date of grant.
|
|
|
|
9/24/99,
2/16/00, 2/5/01, 7/26/02, 7/1/03, 7/1/04, 10/5/04
|
|
Stock
options become exercisable 33 1/3% on the last day of each fiscal year for
three years following the date of grant, including the year of
grant.
|
|
|
|
3/31/05,
2/12/06, 3/6/07, 3/4/08
|
|
See
LTIP Program discussion within the “Long-Term Equity Awards – Time-Based”
section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Stock options
become exercisable 25% on the last day of each fiscal year for four years
following the date of grant, including the year of
grant.
|
|
|
|
6/8/05
|
|
The
performance metrics for these awards have been met. Thus, stock
options became exercisable on January 2, 2009.
|
|
|
|
8/8/06
|
|
Stock
option becomes exercisable 25% on December 31, 2008, 25% on December 31,
2009 and 50% on December 31,
2010.
|
(2)
|
Stock
option awards become exercisable as
follows:
|
Option Grant Date
|
|
Vesting Schedule
|
8/8/06
|
|
See
SALT Program discussion within the “Long-Term Equity Awards
–
Performance-Based”
section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Stock
options become exercisable on December 31, 2009 if certain performance
goals are met. The achievement of the performance metrics
related to this award was approved by the Board on March 2,
2009.
|
|
|
|
5/22/07,
10/13/08
|
|
See
SALT Program discussion within the “Long-Term Equity Awards –
Performance-Based” section of the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis. Stock options become exercisable on December 31, 2010
if certain performance goals are
met.
|
(3)
|
Stock
awards vest as follows:
|
Stock Award Grant Date
|
|
Vesting Schedule
|
11/15/02,
11/1/03, 10/1/04, 10/5/04, 2/11/05
|
|
Stock
awards vest upon the achievement of certain earnings per share targets.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the awards vest in full on the
seventh anniversary of the grant date if employment with the Company has
not terminated. The earnings per share targets are as follows:
2002 grant - $2.00; 2003 grant - $2.40; and 2004 and 2005 grants -
$2.88.
|
|
|
|
2/12/06,
3/6/07, 3/4/08
|
|
See
LTIP Program discussion within the “Long-Term Equity Awards – Time-Based”
section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Stock
awards vest 50% at the end of the second year following the year of grant,
including the year of grant and 25% at the end of the third and fourth
year.
|
|
|
|
8/8/06
|
|
Stock
award vests 25% on December 31, 2008, 25% on December 31, 2009 and 50% on
December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
5/22/07
|
|
See
Other Equity Based Compensation discussion within the “Long-Term Equity
Awards” section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Stock
awards vest 50% at the end of the second year following the year of grant,
including the year of grant and 25% at the end of the third and fourth
year.
|
(4)
|
Market
value of shares of stock that have not vested is calculated as the product
of the closing price of our stock on January 2, 2009 of $26.72 and the
number of unvested shares.
|
2008
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The
following table summarizes the number of stock option awards exercised and the
value realized upon exercise during 2008 for the Named Executive Officers, as
well as the number of stock awards vested and the value realized upon
vesting.
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
of
Shares
Acquired
on
Exercise
(#)
|
|
|
Value
Realized
on
Exercise
(1)
|
|
|
Number
of
Shares
Acquired
on
Vesting
(#)
|
|
|
Value
Realized
on
Vesting
(2)
|
|
Thomas
J. Hook
|
|
─
|
|
|
$
|
─
|
|
|
|
21,171
|
|
|
$
|
565,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Mazza
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
7,306
|
|
|
|
195,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mauricio
Arellano
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
6,668
|
|
|
|
178,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan
M. Bratton
|
|
|
1,620
|
|
|
|
15,267
|
|
|
|
6,713
|
|
|
|
179,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan
H. Campbell
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
6,701
|
|
|
|
179,051
|
|
(1)
|
Based
upon the difference between the price of the Company’s Common Stock on the
New York Stock Exchange at the time of exercise and the exercise price for
the stock options exercised.
|
(2)
|
Based
upon the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the New York Stock
Exchange on the date the stock awards
vested.
|
Pension
Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Tables
These
tables are not required as we do not offer our Named Executive Officers the
pension or nonqualified deferred compensation benefits required to be reported
in these tables. See the “Change in Control Agreements” and “Employment
Agreements” section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for a
description of potential post-employment payments.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS
The
business of the Company is managed under the direction of the
Board. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines (the
“Guidelines”) for the Company that reflect the Company’s commitment to good
corporate governance. The full text of the Guidelines is posted in
the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at
www.greatbatch.com
under “Governance.”
The Board
has also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all directors,
executive officers and employees of the Company. The full text of the
code is also posted in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website
under “Governance.” The Company intends to post on its website any
amendment to or waiver from any provision in the Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics that relates to any element of the standards enumerated in the rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
A copy of
the Guidelines and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics may be obtained
without charge by any stockholder of record by written request made to the
Manager of External Reporting and Investor Relations, Greatbatch, Inc., 10000
Wehrle Drive, Clarence, New York 14031.
Board
Independence
Each of
the Company’s directors is independent under the standards set by the New York
Stock Exchange’s Corporate Governance Listing Standards, as amended, and
consistent with the Company’s Guidelines, other than Mr. Hook. The
Guidelines specify the criteria by which the independence of the Company’s
directors will be determined and provide that a director is independent if the
director is neither a current or former employee or officer of the Company, the
director does not receive any remuneration from the Company, either directly or
indirectly, in any capacity other than as a director, and the director is not a
partner or controlling stockholder or executive officer of any organization that
has a business relationship with the Company. When making an
independence determination, the Board endeavors to consider all relevant facts
and circumstances.
In making
determinations of independence, the Board also uses categorical standards set
forth by the New York Stock Exchange to assist it in making independence
determinations. Under these standards, absent other material
relationships with the Company that the Board believes to jeopardize a
director’s independence from management, a director will be independent unless
the director or any of his or her immediate family members had any of the
following relationships with the Company: employment during any of
the past three years (as an executive officer in the case of family members);
the receipt of more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation (other than
director fees) during any of the past three years; affiliation or employment
with a present or former internal or external auditor during any of the past
three years; employment with another company where any executive officers of the
Company serve on that company’s compensation committee during any of the past
three years; being an executive officer of a charitable organization to which
the Company contributed the greater of $1 million or 2% of such charitable
organization’s consolidated gross revenues in any single fiscal year during the
preceding three years; or being an executive officer of a company that makes
payments to, or receives payments from, the Company for property or services in
a fiscal year in an amount in excess of the greater of $1 million or 2% of such
other company’s consolidated gross revenues.
In
accordance with the Guidelines, the Board undertook its annual review of
director independence. During this review, the Board considered the
materiality of any relationships with the Company from the director’s
perspective and the perspective of any persons or organizations with which the
director is affiliated. Material relationships may include
commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable or
familial relationships and can also be indirect, such that serving as a partner
or officer, or holding shares, of an organization that has a relationship with
the Company may cause the director not to be independent. As provided
in the Guidelines, the purpose of this review was to determine whether any such
relationships or transactions existed that were inconsistent with a
determination that the director is independent.
Pursuant
to the Guidelines and following the review described above, the Board has
affirmatively determined that no current director has a material relationship
with the Company that is inconsistent with a determination of independence,
except Mr. Hook. Therefore, the Board affirmatively determined that
all the current directors, with the exception of Mr. Hook, are
independent.
Meetings
and Committees of the Board
The Board
has standing Audit, Compensation and Organization, Corporate Governance and
Nominating, and Technology Innovation Committees. Each committee has
a written charter posted on the Investor Relations section of the Company’s
website under “Governance.” Copies of the charters may be obtained
without charge by any stockholder of record by written request made to the
Manager of External Reporting and Investor Relations, Greatbatch, Inc., 10000
Wehrle Drive, Clarence, New York 14031.
The Board
held six meetings in 2008. Each director attended at least 75% of the
meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees of the Board on which each
director served. All of the Company’s directors then serving on the
Board attended the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders. The Company
requests, but has no formal policy regarding director attendance at its annual
meeting of stockholders.
Audit Committee
- The
Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Dinkins, Melia (Chair), Soderberg, Summers
and Wareham. The Audit Committee’s primary purpose is assisting the
Board in overseeing the (i) integrity of the Company’s financial statements,
(ii) Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (iii)
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm qualifications and
independence, (iv) performance of the Company’s internal audit function and
independent registered public accounting firm and (v) Company’s system of
disclosure controls and system of internal controls regarding finance,
accounting, legal compliance, related person transactions and ethics that
management and the Board have established. The Audit Committee had
eight meetings in 2008.
Compensation
and
Organization
Committee
- The Compensation and Organization Committee consists of Ms.
Bailey and Messrs. Dinkins, Soderberg and Summers (Chair). The
Compensation and Organization Committee’s primary purpose is establishing the
Company’s executive compensation philosophy that will attract, retain and
motivate superior executives and ensure that senior executives of the Company
and its wholly owned subsidiaries are compensated appropriately in a manner
consistent with the compensation philosophy, internal equity considerations,
competitive practice and the requirements of the appropriate regulatory
bodies. The Compensation and Organization Committee also administers
the Company’s 1997 and 1998 Stock Option Plans, the 2002 Restricted Stock
Plan and the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. The Compensation and
Organization Committee had seven meetings in 2008.
Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee
- The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
consists of Ms. Bailey (Chair), Dr. Miller, Mr. Sanford and Dr.
Wisniewski. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
identifies qualified individuals to become members of the Board, recommends to
the Board the selection of director nominees, develops and recommends to the
Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Company and
evaluates the effectiveness of the Board. The Corporate Governance
and Nominating Committee reviews with the Board, on an annual basis, the
composition of the Board and whether the Company is being well served by the
directors taking into account their independence, age, skills, experience and
availability for service. The Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee recommends director nominees to the Board considering the factors
discussed above, provided that no director may sit on the board of, or
beneficially own stock in (other than through mutual funds or similar
non-discretionary, undirected arrangement), any of the Company’s competitors in
its principal lines of business. The Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee may, and has sole authority to, retain a search firm to
assist in identifying qualified director candidates. Michael Dinkins
was initially identified as a potential candidate for election to the Board by a
search firm retained by the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s policy
is to consider director candidates recommended from all sources, including
stockholder recommendations, to the extent those candidates will improve the
Board’s composition based on the factors discussed above. The
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee uses the same process for
evaluating candidates for director regardless of the source of the
recommendation. Stockholders wishing to submit recommendations for
candidates to the Board must supply information in writing regarding the
candidate to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee at the Company’s
executive offices at 10000 Wehrle Drive, Clarence, New York
14031. The information should include, at a minimum, the candidate’s
name, biographical information, qualifications and availability for
service. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee had five
meetings in 2008.
Technology Innovation
Committee
- The Technology Innovation Committee, formerly known as the
Science and Technology Development Committee, consists of Dr. Miller (Chair),
Messrs. Hook, Melia and Wareham and Dr. Wisniewski. The Technology
Innovation Committee periodically examines and provides oversight to
management’s direction and investment in the Company’s research and development,
as well as in its technology and commercialization initiatives and advises the
Board on scientific matters that include major internal projects, interaction
with academic and other outside research organizations and the acquisition of
technologies and products. The Technology Innovation Committee had
three meetings in 2008.
Executive
Sessions of the Board
The
independent non-management directors, consisting of all current directors except
for Mr. Hook, meet without management at regularly scheduled executive sessions
at the conclusion of each regular quarterly Board meeting and at such other
times as they deem appropriate. Mr. Sanford, Board Chairman, serves
as the “lead outside director” of the Company and has been designated
as the presiding director of the non-management directors when they meet in
executive sessions without management.
Communications
with the Board
Any
stockholder or interested party who wishes to communicate with the Board may do
so electronically by sending an e-mail to Messrs. Sanford or Melia via the
Whistleblower Information page of the Investor Relations section of the
Company’s website (www.greatbatch.com) under “Governance”, by leaving a
confidential voicemail message for either Mr. Sanford (716-759-5501) or Mr.
Melia (716-759-5508), or by writing to the following address: Board
of Directors, Greatbatch, Inc., 10000 Wehrle Drive, Clarence, NY
14031.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
In fiscal
year 2008, Ms. Bailey and Messrs. Dinkins, Soderberg and Summers served on the
Compensation and Organization Committee. No person who served as a
member of the Compensation and Organization Committee during fiscal year 2008
was (i) an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries during
such fiscal year (ii) formerly an officer of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or (iii) had any relationship requiring disclosure by the Company
under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933.
2008
Director Compensation
The
Company uses a combination of cash and stock-based incentive compensation to
attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on our Board. For
2008, each non-employee director was paid a retainer of $150,000 ($210,000 for
the Chairman) in a combination of cash and equity awards. In setting
director compensation, the Company considers the significant amount of time that
directors expend in fulfilling their duties to the Company as well as the
skill-level required for members of the Board. Directors who are also
employees of the Company receive no additional remuneration for services as a
director. All awards and changes to director’s compensation are approved by
the Board.
Cash Compensation
-
For 2008, the cash portion of each non-employee director’s annual retainer was
$30,000. With respect to Dr. Wisniewski and Mr. Dinkins, that amount
was pro rated to reflect their partial year of service. Directors
also received additional cash payments as follows:
Chairman
of the Board
|
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
Audit
Committee Chair
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
Compensation
and Organization Committee Chair
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee Chair
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
Technology
Innovation Committee Chair
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
Committee
Meeting Fees
|
|
$ 1,000
per meeting attended
|
|
Board
Meeting Fees for each Meeting Attended in Excess of Five
|
|
$ 1,000
per meeting attended
|
|
Equity Compensation
– For 2008, the equity-based portion of each non-employee director’s annual
retainer was equal in value to $120,000 ($180,000 for the
Chairman). With respect to Dr. Wisniewski and Mr. Dinkins, that
amount was pro rated to reflect their partial year of service. The
equity compensation is based upon the guidelines of the LTIP Program and was
comprised of ½ non-qualified stock options and ½ restricted
stock. The amount of stock options awarded is calculated using the
Black-Scholes value of our stock on the date of grant. The amount of
restricted shares granted is calculated using the closing price of the Company’s
Common Stock on the date of grant. All equity-based awards are
granted on the first business day of the fiscal year and vest on the last day of
the fiscal year in which they were granted. For 2007, the equity
award was granted and vested on the first business day of 2008. Thus,
during 2008 directors were granted their equity awards for fiscal years 2007 and
2008.
Retirement
– Upon
Board approved retirement, each retiring director receives; 1) immediate
vesting of any unvested equity-based awards; and 2) the right to exercise all
outstanding stock options for a period of 3 years.
On the
date a non-employee first becomes a member of the Board, such non-employee
Director is granted a stock option award for Common Stock equal in value to
$100,000. The shares granted under such stock option have an exercise
price equal to the closing price of the Common Stock as of the close of business
on the grant date. Each such stock option is exercisable in three
equal annual installments beginning on the first occurrence of December 31st
which is at least six months after the date of grant.
The
following table contains information concerning the total compensation earned by
each individual who served as a director of Greatbatch during 2008, other than
directors who are also Named Executive Officers:
Name
|
|
Fees
Earned
or Paid
in
Cash
(1)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
(2)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
(2)
|
|
|
Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Comp.
|
|
|
Change
in
Pension
Value
and Non-
Qualified
Deferred
Comp.
Earnings
|
|
|
All
Other
Comp.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pamela
G. Bailey
|
|
$
|
51,000
|
|
|
$
|
89,986
|
|
|
$
|
89,994
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
230,980
|
|
Michael
Dinkins
(3)
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
9,978
|
|
|
|
15,257
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
32,235
|
|
Kevin
C. Melia
|
|
|
52,667
|
|
|
|
72,489
|
|
|
|
85,552
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
210,708
|
|
Dr.
Joseph A. Miller, Jr.
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
89,986
|
|
|
|
89,994
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
227,980
|
|
Bill
R. Sanford
|
|
|
76,000
|
|
|
|
132,467
|
|
|
|
132,490
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
340,957
|
|
Peter
H. Soderberg
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
|
|
89,986
|
|
|
|
89,994
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
220,980
|
|
Thomas
S. Summer
(4)
|
|
|
27,833
|
|
|
|
29,989
|
|
|
|
29,996
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
87,818
|
|
William
B. Summers, Jr.
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
89,986
|
|
|
|
89,994
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
239,980
|
|
John
P. Wareham
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
|
|
89,986
|
|
|
|
89,994
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
220,980
|
|
Dr.
Helena S. Wisniewski
(5)
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
49,987
|
|
|
|
83,324
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
166,311
|
|
(1)
|
The
amounts indicated represent the amount earned for retainers and Board or
committee meeting fees.
|
(2)
|
The
amounts indicated represent the aggregate dollar amount of compensation
expense related to restricted stock and stock option awards granted that
was recognized in our financial statements during 2008 and includes
amounts from awards granted prior to 2008. The determination of
this expense is based on the methodology set forth in notes 1 and 10 to
our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which
was filed with the SEC on March 3, 2009. No director stock or
option awards were repriced or modified during 2008. Due to a
change in director compensation policy in 2008, equity grants were made at
the beginning of the year with a 1 year vest versus the end of the year
with immediate vesting. Thus, during 2008 directors were
awarded both their 2007 and 2008 equity
retainers.
|
(3)
|
Mr.
Dinkins was appointed to the Board in November 2008 and was granted a
stock option award for Common Stock equal in value to $100,000 on the date
he became a director and received a pro-rata portion of his cash and
equity compensation for 2008.
|
(4)
|
Effective
May 20, 2008, Mr. Summer’s term as a member of the Board
expired. He did not stand for reelection at the 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
|
(5)
|
Dr.
Wisniewski was appointed to the Board in March 2008 and was granted a
stock option award for Common Stock equal in value to $100,000 on the date
she became a director and received a pro-rata portion of her cash and
equity compensation for 2008.
|
The
following table contains information concerning the equity -based compensation
for each individual who served as a director of Greatbatch during 2008, other
than directors who are also Named Executive Officers:
|
|
Aggregate
Grant Date
Fair
Value Received in
2008
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Name
|
|
Stock
Awards
(1)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
(1)
|
|
|
Number of Stock
Options held at
January 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
Pamela
G. Bailey
|
|
$
|
89,986
|
|
|
$
|
89,994
|
|
|
|
32,416
|
|
Michael
Dinkins
(2)
|
|
|
9,978
|
|
|
|
109,986
|
|
|
|
10,334
|
|
Kevin
C. Melia
|
|
|
72,489
|
|
|
|
72,498
|
|
|
|
16,275
|
|
Dr.
Joseph A. Miller, Jr.
|
|
|
89,986
|
|
|
|
89,994
|
|
|
|
27,166
|
|
Bill
R. Sanford
|
|
|
132,467
|
|
|
|
132,490
|
|
|
|
39,025
|
|
Peter
H. Soderberg
|
|
|
89,986
|
|
|
|
89,994
|
|
|
|
32,416
|
|
Thomas
S. Summer
(3)
|
|
|
29,989
|
|
|
|
29,996
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
William
B. Summers, Jr.
|
|
|
89,986
|
|
|
|
89,994
|
|
|
|
32,416
|
|
John
P. Wareham
|
|
|
89,986
|
|
|
|
89,994
|
|
|
|
26,916
|
|
Dr.
Helena S. Wisniewski
(4)
|
|
|
49,987
|
|
|
|
149,986
|
|
|
|
17,304
|
|
(1)
|
Due
to a change in director compensation policy in 2008, equity grants were
made at the beginning of the year with a 1 year vest versus the end of the
year with immediate vesting. Thus, during 2008 directors were
awarded both their 2007 and 2008 equity
retainers.
|
(2)
|
Mr.
Dinkins was appointed to the Board in November 2008 and was granted a
stock option award for Common Stock equal in value to $100,000 on the date
he became a director and received a pro-rata portion of his cash and
equity compensation for 2008.
|
(3)
|
Effective
May 20, 2008, Mr. Summer’s term as a member of the Board
expired. He did not stand for reelection at the 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
|
(4)
|
Dr.
Wisniewski was appointed to the Board in March 2008 and was granted a
stock option award for Common Stock equal in value to $100,000 on the date
she became a director and received a pro-rata portion of her cash and
equity compensation for 2008.
|
Related
Person Transactions
The Board
has adopted a written policy setting forth procedures for the review, approval
and monitoring of transactions involving the Company and related persons
(directors and executive officers or their immediate family members). A
copy of the Company’s policy on related person transactions is available in the
Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at
www.greatbatch.com
under “Governance.” Under this policy, every proposed transaction between
the Company and a director, executive officer, a nominee director, stockholder
owning in excess of 5% of the Company or any immediate family member or entity
of the foregoing persons involving an amount in excess of $100,000 and in which
the related person will have a direct or indirect material interest, must be
approved or ratified by the Audit Committee. If the transaction
involves a related person who is a director or an immediate family member of a
director, such director may not participate in the deliberations or vote
regarding such approval. In the event management determines it is
impractical or undesirable to wait until an Audit Committee meeting to
consummate a related person transaction, the Chairperson of the Audit Committee
may review and approve the related person transaction. The
Chairperson of the Audit Committee will report any such approval to the Audit
Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting. All related person
transactions are reported by the Audit Committee to the Board. In the
event the Company becomes aware of a related person transaction that has not
been approved, the matter shall be reviewed by the Audit Committee who shall
evaluate all options available to the Company, including ratification, revision
or termination of such transaction. The Audit Committee will also
examine the facts and circumstances pertaining to the failure of such
transaction to have been presented to the Audit Committee and shall take any
such action as deemed appropriate under the circumstances. The Board
has determined that there were no related person transactions as defined above
that occurred in 2008.
Audit
Committee Report
The Audit
Committee currently consists of Messrs. Dinkins, Melia (Chair), Soderberg,
Summers and Wareham, each of whom the Board has determined is “independent” in
accordance with applicable laws and the listing standards of the New York Stock
Exchange and qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under applicable
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee
functions pursuant to a written charter, a copy of which is posted in the
Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at
www.greatbatch.com
under “Governance” and “Committee Composition and
Charters.”
The Audit
Committee reviewed and discussed the information contained in the 2008 first,
second, third and fourth quarter earnings announcements with management of the
Company and independent registered public accounting firm prior to public
release. They also reviewed and discussed the information contained
in the 2008 first, second and third quarters’ Forms 10-Q and full year Form 10-K
with management of the Company and independent registered public accounting firm
prior to filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In
addition, the Audit Committee met regularly with management, internal auditors
and independent registered public accounting firm on various financial and
operational matters, including to review plans and scope of audits and audit
reports and to discuss necessary action.
In
connection with the Company’s fiscal 2008 consolidated financial statements, the
Audit Committee has:
|
•
|
reviewed
and discussed with management the Company’s audited consolidated financial
statements as of and for fiscal year 2008;
|
|
|
|
•
|
discussed
with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the
matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards
No. 114,
The
Auditor’s Communication with those Charged with Governance,
and SEC
rule 2-07; and
|
|
|
|
•
|
received
and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable
requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board regarding the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning
independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public
accounting firm its independence.
|
Based on
the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended
to the Board, and the Board approved, that the audited consolidated financial
statements referred to above be included in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for fiscal year 2008.
Respectfully
submitted,
|
|
Michael
Dinkins
|
Kevin
C. Melia (Chair)
|
Peter
H. Soderberg
|
William
B. Summers, Jr.
|
John
P. Wareham
|
|
Members
of the Audit Committee
|
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
Any
stockholder who intends to present a proposal intended to be considered for
inclusion in the proxy statement for presentation at the Company’s 2010 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders must submit such proposal so that the Company receives
it by January 15, 2010. The proposal should be submitted to the
Company’s offices in Clarence, New York by certified mail, return receipt
requested, and should be directed to the Vice President, General Counsel &
Secretary of the Company. In addition, the Company’s by-laws require
that notice of any business proposed by a stockholder to be brought before an
annual meeting, whether or not proposed for inclusion in the Company’s proxy
statement, must be received by the Secretary of the Company not later than 90
days nor more than 120 days in advance of the anniversary date of the prior
year’s annual meeting, which for business proposed for the 2010 Annual Meeting
is between January 15, 2010 and February 14, 2010.
OTHER
MATTERS
Management
does not know of any matters to be presented at this Annual Meeting other than
those set forth in this proxy statement and in the notice accompanying this
proxy statement. If other matters should properly come before the
Annual Meeting, it is intended that the proxy holders will vote on such matters
in accordance with their best judgment.
A copy of
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2008 may be obtained
without charge by any stockholder of record by written request made to
Christopher J. Thome, Manager of External Reporting and Investor Relations,
Greatbatch, Inc., 10000 Wehrle Drive, Clarence, New York
14031. Additionally, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
fiscal year 2008 may be obtained through the Financial Information link of the
Investor Relations section of the Company’s website under “SEC
Filings.”
By
Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
/s/
Timothy G. McEvoy
|
|
Timothy
G. McEvoy
|
Vice
President, General Counsel &
Secretary
|
Clarence,
New York
April 13,
2009
EXHIBIT
A
GREATBATCH,
INC.
2009
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
1
PREAMBLE
This
Greatbatch, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, as it may be amended from time to
time (the “Plan”), is intended to promote the interests of Greatbatch, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (“GB” and, together with its Subsidiaries, the “Company”),
and its stockholders by providing officers and other employees and non-employee
directors of the Company with appropriate incentives and rewards to encourage
them to enter into and continue in service to the Company and to acquire a
proprietary interest in the long-term success of the Company, while aligning the
interests of key employees and management with those of the
stockholders.
This Plan
is intended to provide a flexible framework that will permit the development and
implementation of a variety of stock-based programs based on changing needs of
the Company, its competitive market and the regulatory climate.
2
DEFINITIONS
As used
in the Plan, the following definitions apply to the terms indicated
below:
(a)
“Award
Agreement” shall mean the written agreement between the Company and a
Participant or other document approved by the Committee evidencing an Incentive
Award.
(b)
“Board of
Directors” shall mean the Board of Directors of GB.
(c)
“Cause,”
and the term “for cause” shall mean,
(1)
with
respect to a Participant who is a party to a written employment agreement with
the Company, which agreement contains a definition of “for cause” or “cause” (or
words of like import) for purposes of termination of employment thereunder by
the Company, “for cause” or “cause” as defined in the most recent of such
agreements, or
(2)
in all
other cases, as determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, that one or
more of the following has occurred: (A) any intentional or willful
failure, or failure due to bad faith, by such Participant to substantially
perform his or her duties to the Company which shall not have been corrected
within 30 days following written notice thereof, (B) any misconduct by such
Participant which is significantly injurious to the Company, (C) any breach by
such Participant of any covenant contained in the instrument pursuant to which
an Incentive Award is granted, (D) such Participant’s conviction of, or entry of
a plea of
nolo
contendere
in
respect of, any felony which results in, or is reasonably expected to result in,
economic or reputational injury to the Company.
(d)
“Change
in Control”, unless otherwise defined in an Award Agreement, occurs
if
(1)
any
“Person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange
Act of 1934), is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the total
combined voting power of all classes of capital stock of GB normally entitled to
vote for the election of directors of GB; or
(2)
a sale of
all or substantially all of the assets of the Company is consummated, in one
transaction or a series of related transactions, or
(3)
any
merger or consolidation of GB is consummated in which the shareholders of GB
immediately prior to such transaction own, in the aggregate, less than 50% of
the total combined voting power of all classes of capital stock of the surviving
entity normally entitled to vote for the election of directors of the surviving
entity.
For
purposes hereof, ownership of voting securities shall take into account and
shall include ownership as determined by applying the provisions of Rule
13d-3(d)(1)(i) (as in effect on the date hereof) pursuant to the Exchange
Act.
(e)
“Code”
shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
(f)
“Committee”
shall mean the Compensation and Organization Committee of the Board of Directors
or such other committee as the Board of Directors shall appoint from time to
time to administer the Plan; provided, that the Committee shall at all times
consist of two or more persons, each of whom shall be a member of the Board of
Directors. To the extent required for transactions under the Plan to qualify for
the exemptions available under Rule 16b-3 (as defined herein), members of
the Committee (or any subcommittee thereof) shall be “non-employee directors”
within the meaning of Rule 16b-3. To the extent required for
compensation realized from Incentive Awards (as defined herein) under the Plan
to be deductible by the Company pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code,
members of the Committee (or any subcommittee thereof) shall be “outside
directors” within the meaning of such section.
(g)
“Company
Stock” shall mean the common stock, par value $.01 per share, of
GB.
(h)
“Covered
Employee” means a Participant who is, or could be, a “covered employee” within
the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code.
(i)
“Disability,”
unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, shall mean
(1)
with
respect to a Participant who is a party to a written employment agreement with
the Company, which agreement contains a definition of “disability” or “permanent
disability” (or words of like import) for purposes of termination of employment
thereunder by the Company, “disability” or “permanent disability” as
defined in the most recent of such agreements, or
(2)
in all
other cases, means such Participant’s inability to perform substantially his or
her duties to the Company by reason of physical or mental illness, injury,
infirmity or condition: (A) for a continuous period for 180 days or one or more
periods aggregating 180 days in any twelve-month period; (B) at such time as
such Participant is eligible to receive disability income payments under any
long-term disability insurance plan maintained by the Company; or (C) at such
earlier time as such Participant or the Company submits medical evidence, in the
form of a physician’s certification, that such Participant has a physical or
mental illness, injury, infirmity or condition that will likely prevent such
Participant from substantially performing his duties for 180 days or
longer.
(j)
“Effective
Date” shall mean March 2, 2009, the date the Plan was adopted by the Board of
Directors, subject to approval by GB’s stockholders. The Plan will be
deemed to be approved by the stockholders if it receives the affirmative vote of
the holders of a majority of the shares of stock of GB present or represented
and entitled to vote at a meeting at which a quorum representing a majority of
all outstanding voting stock is, either in person or by proxy, present and
voting and duly held in accordance with the applicable provisions of GB’s
Bylaws. Incentive Awards may be granted under the Plan at any time
prior to the receipt of stockholder approval; provided, however, that each such
grant shall automatically terminate in the vent such approval is not
obtained. Without limiting the foregoing, no Option or SAR may be
exercised prior to the receipt of such approval, and no share certificate will
be issued pursuant to a grant of Restricted Stock or Stock Bonus prior to the
receipt of such approval.
(k)
“Exchange
Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(l)
“Fair
Market Value” means, for any particular date, (i) for any period during which
the Company Stock shall be listed for trading on a national securities exchange
or the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System
(“NASDAQ”), the closing price per share of Company Stock on such exchange or the
NASDAQ closing bid price as of the close of such trading day, or (ii) the market
price per share of Company Stock as determined in good faith by the Board of
Directors in the event (i) above shall not be applicable. If the Fair
Market Value is to be determined as of a day when the securities markets are not
open, the Fair Market Value on that day shall be the Fair Market Value on the
next preceding day when the markets were open.
(m)
“Incentive
Award” shall mean an Option, SAR, share of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock
Unit or Stock Bonus (each as defined herein) granted pursuant to the terms of
the Plan.
(n)
“Incentive
Stock Option” shall mean an Option that is an “incentive stock option” within
the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.
(o)
“Issue
Date” shall mean the date established by the Committee on which Certificates
representing shares of Restricted Stock shall be issued by the Company pursuant
to the terms of Section 9(e).
(p)
“Non-Qualified
Stock Option” shall mean an Option that is not an Incentive Stock
Option.
(q)
“Option”
shall mean an option to purchase shares of Company Stock granted pursuant to
Section 7.
(r)
“Participant”
shall mean an employee, a non-employee consultant or service provider, or
non-employee director of the Company to whom an Incentive Award is granted
pursuant to the Plan and, upon his or her death, his or her successors, heirs,
executors and administrators, as the case may be.
(s)
“Performance-Based
Award” means an Award granted to selected Covered Employees pursuant to Sections
9 and 10, but which is subject to the terms and conditions set forth in Section
12. All Performance-Based Awards are intended to qualify as Qualified
Performance-Based Compensation.
(t)
“Performance
Criteria” means the criteria that the Committee selects for purposes of
establishing the Performance Goal or Performance Goals for a Participant for a
Performance Period. The Performance Criteria that will be used to
establish Performance Goals are limited to the following: net earnings (either
before or after interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), economic
value-added (as determined by the Committee), sales or revenue, net income
(either before or after taxes), operating earnings or income, cash flow
(including, but not limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow), cash
flow return on capital, return on investment, return on stockholders’ equity,
return on assets or net assets, return on capital, stockholder returns, return
on sales, gross or net profit margin, productivity, expense, margins, operating
efficiency, cost reduction or savings, customer satisfaction, working capital,
earnings or diluted earnings per share, price per share of Company Stock, and
market share, any of which may be measured either in absolute terms or as
compared to any incremental increase or as compared to results of a peer
group. The Committee shall, within the time prescribed by Section
162(m) of the Code, define in an objective fashion the manner of calculating the
Performance Criteria it selects to use for such Performance Period for such
Participant.
(u)
“Performance
Goals” means, for a Performance Period, the goals established in writing by the
Committee for the Performance Period based upon the Performance
Criteria. Depending on the Performance Criteria used to establish
such Performance Goals, the Performance Goals may be expressed in terms of
overall Company performance or the performance of a division, business unit, or
an individual. The Committee, in its discretion, may, within the time
prescribed by Section 162(m) of the Code, adjust or modify the calculation of
Performance Goals for such Performance Period in order to prevent the dilution
or enlargement of the rights of Participants (a) in the event of, or in
anticipation of, any unusual or extraordinary corporate item, transaction,
event, or development, or (b) in recognition of, or in anticipation of, any
other unusual or nonrecurring events affecting the Company (determined
consistent with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), or
the financial statements of the Company, or in response to, or in anticipation
of, changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles, or business
conditions.
(v)
“Performance
Period” means the one or more periods of time, which may be of varying and
overlapping durations, as the Committee may select, over which the attainment of
one or more Performance Goals will be measured for the purpose of determining a
Participant’s right to, and the payment of, a Performance-Based
Award.
(w)
“Qualified
Performance-Based Compensation” means any compensation that is intended to
qualify as “qualified performance-based compensation” as described in Section
162(m)(4)(C) of the Code.
(x)
“Reprice”
shall mean (A) changing the terms of an Incentive Award to lower its exercise
price; (B) any other action that is treated as a "repricing" under generally
accepted accounting principles; and (C) repurchasing for cash or canceling an
Incentive Award at a time when its exercise price is greater than the Fair
Market Value of the underlying stock in exchange for another Incentive Award,
unless the cancellation and exchange occurs in connection with a Change in
Control. Such cancellation and exchange would be considered a "repricing"
regardless of whether it is treated as a “repricing” under generally accepted
accounting principles and regardless of whether it is voluntary on the part of
the Participant.
(y)
A share
of “Restricted Stock” shall mean a share of Company Stock that is granted
pursuant to the terms of Section 9 hereof and that is subject to the
restrictions set forth in Section 9(c).
(z)
“Restricted
Stock Unit” means the right to receive a share of Company Stock that is granted
pursuant to the terms of Section 10.
(aa)
“Rule 16b-3”
shall mean the rule thus designated as promulgated under the Exchange
Act.
(bb)
“SAR”
shall mean a stock appreciation right granted pursuant to
Section 8.
(cc)
“Stock
Bonus” shall mean a bonus payable in shares of Company Stock or a payment made
in shares of Company Stock pursuant to a deferred compensation plan of the
Company.
(dd)
“Subsidiary”
shall mean any corporation or other entity in which, at the time of reference,
the Company owns, directly or indirectly, stock or similar interests comprising
more than 50 percent of the combined voting power of all outstanding
securities of such entity.
(ee)
“Vesting
Date” shall mean the date established by the Committee on which a share of
Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit may vest.
3
STOCK SUBJECT TO THE
PLAN
(a)
Shares
Available for Awards
The total
number of shares of Company Stock with respect to which Incentive Awards may be
granted shall not exceed 1,350,000 shares. Such shares may be
authorized but unissued Company Stock or authorized and issued Company Stock
held in the Company’s treasury or acquired by the Company for the purposes of
the Plan. The Committee may direct that any stock certificate
evidencing shares issued pursuant to the Plan shall bear a legend setting forth
such restrictions on transferability as may apply to such shares pursuant to the
Plan.
(b)
Total
Grants by Award Type
The total
number of shares of Company Stock to be awarded under the Plan as Options or
SARs shall not exceed 1,350,000 shares. The total number of shares of
Company Stock to be awarded under the Plan as Incentive Stock Options shall not
exceed 1,350,000 shares. The total number of shares of Company Stock
to be awarded under the Plan as Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or as
Stock Bonuses shall, in the aggregate, not exceed 200,000 shares and no more
than 150,000 shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units shall be
issued in any fiscal year of the Company. With respect to SARs, when
a stock settled SAR is exercised, the shares subject to a SAR grant agreement
shall be counted against the shares available for award as one (1) share for
every share subject thereto, regardless of the number of shares used to settle
the SAR upon exercise.
(c)
Individual
Limitation
The total
number of shares of Company Stock subject to Options and SARs awarded to any one
employee during any fiscal year of the Company, other than awards made pursuant
to Section 12, shall not exceed 100,000 shares. Determinations under
the preceding sentence shall be made in a manner that is consistent with
Section 162(m) of the Code and regulations promulgated
thereunder. The provisions of this Section 3(c) shall not apply
in any circumstance with respect to which the Committee determines that
compliance with Section 162(m) of the Code is not necessary.
(d)
Adjustment
for Change in Capitalization
If there
is any change in the outstanding shares of Company Stock by reason of a stock
dividend or distribution, stock split-up, recapitalization, combination or
exchange of shares, or by reason of any merger, consolidation, spinoff or other
corporate reorganization in which the Company is the surviving corporation, the
number of shares available for issuance both in the aggregate and with respect
to each outstanding Incentive Award, the price per share under each outstanding
Incentive Award, and the limitations set forth in Section 3(b) and (c),
shall be proportionately adjusted by the Committee, whose determination shall be
final and binding. After any adjustment made pursuant to this
Section 3(d), the number of shares subject to each outstanding Incentive
Award shall be rounded to the nearest whole number.
(e)
Other
Adjustments
In the
event of any transaction or event described in Section 3(d) or any unusual or
nonrecurring transactions or events affecting the Company, any affiliate of the
Company, or the financial statements of the Company or any affiliate (including
without limitation any Change in Control), or of changes in applicable laws,
regulations or accounting principles, and whenever the Committee determines that
action is appropriate in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the
benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan or
with respect to any Incentive Award under the Plan, to facilitate such
transactions or events or to give effect to such changes in laws, regulations or
principles, the Committee, in its sole discretion and on such terms and
conditions as it deems appropriate, including, if the Committee deems
appropriate, the principles of Treasury Regulation Section 1.424-1(a)(5) except
to the extent necessary to ensure that the action does not violate Section 409A
of the Code, either by amendment of the terms of any outstanding Incentive
Awards or by action taken prior to the occurrence of such transaction or event
and either automatically or upon the Participant’s request, is hereby authorized
to take any one or more of the following actions:
(i)
|
To
provide for either (A) termination of any such Incentive Award in exchange
for an amount of cash and/or other property, if any, equal to the amount
that would have been attained upon the exercise of such Incentive Award or
realization of the Participant’s rights (and, for the avoidance of doubt,
if as of the date of the occurrence of the transaction or event described
in this Section 3(e) the Committee determines in good faith that no amount
would have been attained upon the exercise of such Incentive Award or
realization of the Participant’s rights, then such Incentive Award may be
terminated by the Company without payment) or (B) the replacement of such
Incentive Award with other rights or property selected by the Committee in
its sole discretion;
|
(ii) To
provide that such Incentive Award be assumed by the successor or survivor
corporation, or a parent or subsidiary thereof, or shall be substituted for by
similar options, rights or awards covering the stock of the successor or
survivor corporation, or a parent or subsidiary thereof, with appropriate
adjustments as to the number and kind of shares and prices; and
(iii) To
make adjustments in the number and type of shares of Company Stock (or other
securities or property) subject to outstanding Incentive Awards, and in the
number and kind of outstanding Restricted Stock and/or in the terms and
conditions of (including the grant or exercise price), and the criteria included
in, outstanding options, rights and awards and options, rights and awards which
may be granted in the future;
(iv) To
provide that such Incentive Award shall be exercisable or payable or fully
vested with respect to all shares covered thereby, notwithstanding anything to
the contrary in the Plan or the applicable Award Agreement; and
(v) To
provide that the Incentive Award cannot vest, be exercised or become payable
after such event.
(f)
Re-use of
Shares
To the
extent that an Incentive Award terminates, expires, is cancelled, forfeited, or
lapses for any reason, or if an Incentive Award is settled by payment of cash,
any shares of Company Stock subject to the Incentive Award shall again be
available for the grant of an Incentive Award pursuant to the
Plan. Shares which are used to pay the exercise price of an Option
and shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations will not be available
for further grants of Incentive Awards pursuant to the Plan. To the
extent permitted by applicable law or any exchange rule, shares of Company Stock
issued in assumption of, or in substitution for, any outstanding awards of any
entity acquired in any form of combination by the Company or any Subsidiary
shall not be counted against shares of Company Stock available for grant
pursuant to this Plan.
(g)
No
Repricing
Absent
stockholder approval, neither the Committee nor the Board of Directors shall
have any authority, with or without the consent of the affected holders of
Incentive Awards, to “Reprice” an Incentive Award. This paragraph may
not be amended, altered or repealed by the Board of Directors or the Committee
without approval of the stockholders of the Company.
4
ADMINISTRATION OF THE
PLAN
The Plan
shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall from time
to time designate the persons who shall be granted Incentive Awards and the
amount, type and other features of each Incentive Award.
The
Committee shall have full authority to administer the Plan, including authority
to interpret and construe any provision of the Plan and the terms of any
Incentive Award issued under it and to adopt such rules and regulations for
administering the Plan as it may deem necessary or appropriate. The
Committee shall determine whether an authorized leave of absence or absence due
to military or government service shall constitute termination of
employment. Decisions of the Committee shall be final and binding on
all parties. Determinations made by the Committee under the Plan need
not be uniform but may be made on a Participant-by-Participant
basis. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the
Board of Directors may, in its sole discretion, at any time and from time to
time, resolve to administer the Plan, in which case the term “Committee” as used
herein shall be deemed to mean the Board of Directors.
The
Committee may, in its absolute discretion, without amendment to the Plan,
(i) accelerate the date on which any Option or SAR granted under the Plan
becomes exercisable, (ii) waive or amend the operation of Plan provisions
respecting exercise after termination of service or otherwise adjust any of the
terms of such Option or SAR and (iii) accelerate the Vesting Date or Issue
Date, or waive any condition imposed hereunder, with respect to any share of
Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit or otherwise adjust any of the terms
applicable to such share.
No member
of the Committee shall be liable for any action, omission or determination
relating to the Plan, and the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless each
member of the Committee and each other director or employee of the Company to
whom any duty or power relating to the administration or interpretation of the
Plan has been delegated against any cost or expense (including counsel fees) or
liability (including any sum paid in settlement of a claim with the approval of
the Committee) arising out of any action, omission or determination relating to
the Plan, unless, in either case, such action, omission or determination was
taken or made by such member, director or employee in bad faith and without
reasonable belief that it was in the best interests of the Company.
5
ELIGIBILITY
The
persons who shall be eligible to receive Incentive Awards pursuant to the Plan
shall be such employees of the Company (including employees who are also
directors and prospective employees conditioned on their becoming employees),
non-employee consultants or service providers, and non-employee directors of the
Company as the Committee shall designate from time to time.
6
AWARDS UNDER THE PLAN; AWARD
AGREEMENTS
The
Committee may grant Options, SARs, shares of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock
Units and Stock Bonuses, in such amounts and with such terms and conditions as
the Committee shall determine, subject to the provisions of the
Plan.
Each
Incentive Award granted under the Plan (except an unconditional Stock Bonus)
shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement which shall contain such provisions as
the Committee may in its sole discretion deem necessary or
desirable. By accepting an Incentive Award, a Participant thereby
agrees that the Incentive Award shall be subject to all of the terms and
provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement.
7
OPTIONS
(a)
Identification
of Options
Each
Option shall be clearly identified in the applicable Award Agreement as either
an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-Qualified Stock Option. In the
absence of such identification, an Option will be deemed to be a Non-Qualified
Stock Option.
(b)
Exercise
Price
Each
Award Agreement with respect to an Option shall set forth the amount (the
“exercise price”) payable by the holder to the Company upon exercise of the
Option. The exercise price per share shall be determined by the
Committee but shall in no event be less than the Fair Market Value of a share of
Company Stock on the date the Option is granted.
(c)
Term and
Exercise of Options
(1)
The
applicable Award Agreement will provide the date or dates on which an Option
shall become exercisable. The Committee shall determine the
expiration date of each Option; provided, however, that no Option shall be
exercisable more than ten years after the date of grant. Unless the
applicable Award Agreement provides otherwise, no Option shall be exercisable
prior to the first anniversary of the date of grant.
(2)
An Option
may be exercised for all or any portion of the shares as to which it is
exercisable; provided, that no partial exercise of an Option shall be for an
aggregate exercise price of less than $1,000. The partial exercise of
an Option shall not cause the expiration, termination or cancellation of the
remaining portion thereof.
(3)
Unless
the Committee determines otherwise, an Option shall be exercised by delivering
notice to the Company’s principal office, to the attention of its Secretary (or
the Secretary’s designee), no less than one nor more than ten business days in
advance of the effective date of the proposed exercise. Such notice
shall specify the number of shares of Company Stock with respect to which the
Option is being exercised and the effective date of the proposed exercise and
shall be signed by the Participant or other person then having the right to
exercise the Option. Payment for shares of Company Stock purchased
upon the exercise of an Option shall be made on the effective date of such
exercise by one or a combination of the following means: (i) in cash, by
certified check, bank cashier’s check or wire transfer; (ii) subject to the
approval of the Committee, in shares of Company Stock owned by the Participant
for at least six months prior to the date of exercise and valued at their Fair
Market Value on the effective date of such exercise; or (iii) by means of a
broker assisted cashless exercise procedure complying with applicable law, and
(iv) by such other provision as the Committee may from time to time
authorize. Any payment in shares of Company Stock shall be effected
by the delivery of such shares to the Secretary (or the Secretary’s designee) of
the Company, duly endorsed in blank or accompanied by stock powers duly executed
in blank, together with any other documents and evidences as the Secretary (or
the Secretary’s designee) of the Company shall require.
(4)
Certificates
for shares of Company Stock purchased upon the exercise of an Option shall be
issued in the name of the Participant or other person entitled to receive such
shares, and delivered to the Participant or such other person as soon as
practicable following the effective date on which the Option is
exercised.
(d)
Limitations
on Incentive Stock Options
(1)
Incentive
Stock Options may be granted only to employees of the Company or any “subsidiary
corporation” thereof (within the meaning of Section 424(f) of the Code and the
applicable regulations thereunder).
(2)
To the
extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of shares of Company Stock with
respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by a
Participant during any calendar year under the Plan and any other stock option
plan of the Company (or any “subsidiary corporation” of the Company within the
meaning of Section 424 of the Code) shall exceed $100,000, or such higher
value as may be permitted under Section 422 of the Code, such Options shall
be treated as Non-Qualified Stock Options. Such Fair Market Value
shall be determined as of the date on which each such Incentive Stock Option is
granted.
(3)
No
Incentive Stock Option may be granted to an individual if, at the time of the
proposed grant, such individual owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total
combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company (or any “subsidiary
corporation” of the Company within the meaning of Section 424 of the Code),
unless (i) the exercise price of such Incentive Stock Option is at least
110% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock at the time such
Incentive Stock Option is granted and (ii) such Incentive Stock Option is
not exercisable after the expiration of five years from the date such Incentive
Stock Option is granted.
(e)
Effect of
Termination of Employment
(1)
Unless
the applicable Award Agreement provides or the Committee shall determine
otherwise, in the event that the employment of a Participant with the Company
shall terminate for any reason other than Cause, Disability or death :
(i) Options granted to such Participant, to the extent that they were
exercisable at the time of such termination, shall remain exercisable until the
date that is three months after such termination, on which date they shall
expire; and (ii) Options granted to such Participant, to the extent that
they were not exercisable at the time of such termination, shall expire at the
close of business on the date of such termination. The three-month
period described in this Section 7(e)(1) shall be extended to one year in
the event of the Participant’s death during such three-month
period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Option shall be exercisable
after the expiration of its term.
(2)
Unless
the applicable Award Agreement provides or the Committee shall determine
otherwise, in the event that the employment of a Participant with the Company
shall terminate on account of the Disability or death of the Participant:
(i) Options granted to such Participant, to the extent that they were
exercisable at the time of such termination, shall remain exercisable until the
first anniversary of such termination, on which date they shall expire; and
(ii) Options granted to such Participant, to the extent that they were not
exercisable at the time of such termination, shall expire at the close of
business on the date of such termination. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, no Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of its
term.
(3)
In the
event of the termination of a Participant’s employment for Cause, all
outstanding Options granted to such Participant shall expire at the commencement
of business on the date of such termination.
(f)
Acceleration
of Exercise Date Upon Change in Control
Unless
the Award Agreement provides or the Committee determines otherwise, upon the
occurrence of a Change in Control, each Option granted under the Plan and
outstanding at such time shall become fully and immediately exercisable and
shall remain exercisable until its expiration, termination or cancellation
pursuant to the terms of the Plan. In addition, in the event of a
Change in Control, the Committee may in its discretion, cancel any outstanding
Options and pay to the holders thereof, in cash or stock, or any combination
thereof, the value of such Options based upon the price per share of Company
Stock to be received by other shareholders of the Company in the Change in
Control less the exercise price of each Option. For the avoidance of
doubt, in the event of a Change in Control, the Committee may cancel any
outstanding Options for which the exercise price is equal to or in excess of the
price per share of the Company stock to be received by shareholders of the
Company in the Change in Control without payment of consideration to the holders
thereof.
(g)
Except as
otherwise provided in an applicable Award Agreement, during the lifetime of a
Participant each Option granted to a Participant shall be exercisable only by
the Participant and no Option shall be assignable or transferable otherwise than
by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. The Committee may
in its sole discretion on a case by case basis, in any applicable agreement
evidencing an Option (other than, to the extent inconsistent with the
requirements of Section 422 of the Code applicable to Incentive Stock Options),
permit a Participant to transfer all or some of the Options to (i) the
Participant’s Immediate Family Members, or (ii) a trust or trusts for the
exclusive benefit of such Immediate Family Members. Following any such transfer,
any transferred Options shall continue to be subject to the same terms and
conditions as were applicable immediately prior to the
transfer. “Immediate Family Members” shall mean a Participant’s
spouse, child(ren) and grandchild(ren). Notwithstanding the
foregoing, Non-Qualified Stock Options may be transferred to a Participant’s
former spouse pursuant to a property settlement made part of an agreement or
court order incident to the divorce.
8
SARS
(a)
Exercise
Price
The
exercise price per share of a SAR shall be determined by the Committee at the
time of grant, but shall in no event be less than the Fair Market Value of a
share of Company Stock on the date of grant.
(b)
Benefit
Upon Exercise
The
exercise of SARs with respect to any number of shares of Company Stock shall
entitle the Participant to receive unrestricted, fully transferable shares of
Company Stock, payable within 2½ months of the date on which the SARs are
exercised, equal in value to the number of SARs exercised multiplied by
(i) the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock on the exercise date
over (ii) the exercise price of the SAR. Fractional share
amounts shall be settled in cash.
(c)
Term and
Exercise of SARS
(1)
The
applicable Award Agreement will provide the dates or dates on which a SAR shall
become exercisable. The Committee shall determine the expiration date
of each SAR; provided, however, that no SAR shall be exercisable more than ten
years after the date of grant. Unless the applicable Award Agreement
provides otherwise, no SAR shall be exercisable prior to the first anniversary
of the date of grant.
(2)
A SAR may
be exercised for all or any portion of the shares as to which it is exercisable;
provided, that no partial exercise of a SAR shall be for an aggregate exercise
price of less than $1,000. The partial exercise of a SAR shall not
cause the expiration, termination or cancellation of the remaining portion
thereof.
(3)
Unless
the Committee determines otherwise, a SAR shall be exercised by delivering
notice to the Company’s principal office, to the attention of its Secretary (or
the Secretary’s designee), no less than one nor more than ten business days in
advance of the effective date of the proposed exercise. Such notice
shall specify the number of shares of Company Stock with respect to which the
SAR is being exercised, and the effective date of the proposed exercise, and
shall be signed by the Participant.
(d)
Effect of
Termination of Employment
The
provisions set forth in Section 7(e) with respect to the exercise of
Options following termination of employment shall apply as well to such exercise
of SARs.
(e)
Acceleration
of Exercise Date Upon Change in Control
Unless
the Award Agreement provides or the Committee determines otherwise, upon the
occurrence of a Change in Control, any SAR granted under the Plan and
outstanding at such time shall become fully and immediately exercisable and
shall remain exercisable until its expiration, termination or cancellation
pursuant to the terms of the Plan. In addition, in the event of a
Change in Control, the Committee may in its discretion, cancel any outstanding
SARs and pay to the holders thereof, in stock, the value of such SARs based upon
the price per share of Company Stock to be received by other shareholders of the
Company in the Change in Control less the exercise price of each
SAR. For the avoidance of doubt, in the event of a Change in Control,
the Committee may cancel any outstanding SARs for which the exercise price is
equal to or in excess of the price per share of the Company stock to be received
by shareholders of the Company in the Change in Control without payment of
consideration to the holders thereof.
9
RESTRICTED
STOCK
(a)
Issue
Date and Vesting Date
At the
time of the grant of shares of Restricted Stock, the Committee shall establish
an Issue Date or Issue Dates and a Vesting Date or Vesting Dates with respect to
such shares. The Committee may divide such shares into classes and
assign a different Issue Date and/or Vesting Date for each class. If
the grantee is employed by the Company on an Issue Date (which may be the date
of grant), the specified number of shares of Restricted Stock shall be issued in
accordance with the provisions of Section 9(e). Provided that
all conditions to the vesting of a share of Restricted Stock imposed pursuant to
Section 9(b) are satisfied, and except as provided in Section 9(g),
upon the occurrence of the Vesting Date with respect to a share of Restricted
Stock, such share shall vest and the restrictions of Section 9(c) shall
cease to apply to such share.
(b)
Conditions
to Vesting
At the
time of the grant of shares of Restricted Stock, the Committee may impose such
restrictions or conditions to the vesting of such shares as it, in its absolute
discretion, deems appropriate. By way of example and not by way of
limitation, the Committee may require, as a condition to the vesting of any
class or classes of shares of Restricted Stock, that the Participant or the
Company achieves such performance goals as the Committee may specify under
Section 12.
(c)
Restrictions
on Transfer Prior to Vesting
Prior to
the vesting of a share of Restricted Stock, no transfer of a Participant’s
rights with respect to such share, whether voluntary or involuntary, by
operation of law or otherwise, shall be permitted. Immediately upon
any attempt to transfer such rights, such share, and all of the rights related
thereto, shall be forfeited by the Participant.
(d)
Dividends
on Restricted Stock
The
Committee in its discretion may require that any dividends paid on shares of
Restricted Stock shall be held in escrow until all restrictions on such shares
have lapsed.
(e)
Issuance
of Certificates
(1)
Reasonably
promptly after the Issue Date with respect to shares of Restricted Stock, the
Company shall cause to be issued a stock certificate, registered in the name of
the Participant to whom such shares were granted, evidencing such shares;
provided, that the Company shall not cause such a stock certificate to be issued
unless it has received a stock power duly endorsed in blank with respect to such
shares. Each such stock certificate shall bear any such legend as the
Company may determine.
Such
legend shall not be removed until such shares vest pursuant to the terms
hereof.
(2)
Each
certificate issued pursuant to this Section 9(e), together with the stock
powers relating to the shares of Restricted Stock evidenced by such certificate,
shall be held by the Company in such manner as the Company may determine unless
the Committee determines otherwise.
(f)
Consequences
of Vesting
Upon the
vesting of a share of Restricted Stock pursuant to the terms of the Plan and the
applicable Award Agreement, the restrictions of Section 9(c) shall cease to
apply to such share. Reasonably promptly after a share of Restricted Stock
vests, the Company shall cause to be delivered to the Participant to whom such
shares were granted, a certificate evidencing such share, free of the legend set
forth in Section 9(e). Notwithstanding the foregoing, such share
still may be subject to restrictions on transfer as a result of applicable
securities laws or pursuant to Section 15.
(g)
Effect of
Termination of Employment
(1)
Unless
the applicable Award Agreement or the Committee determines otherwise, in the
event of the termination of a Participant’s service to the Company for any
reason other than Cause, all shares of Restricted Stock granted to such
Participant which have not vested as of the date of such termination shall
immediately be forfeited and returned to the Company. The Company
also shall have the right to require the return of all dividends paid on such
shares, whether by termination of any escrow arrangement under which such
dividends are held or otherwise.
(2)
In the
event of the termination of a Participant’s employment for Cause, all shares of
Restricted Stock granted to such Participant which have not vested prior to the
date of such termination shall immediately be forfeited and returned to the
Company, together with any dividends credited on such shares by termination of
any escrow arrangement under which such dividends are held or
otherwise.
(h)
Effect of
Change in Control
Unless
the Award Agreement provides or the Committee determines otherwise, upon the
occurrence of a Change in Control, all outstanding shares of Restricted Stock
which have not previously vested shall immediately vest. In addition,
in the event of a Change in Control, the Committee may in its discretion, cancel
any outstanding shares of Restricted Stock and pay to the holders thereof, in
cash or stock, or any combination thereof, the value of such shares of
Restricted Stock based upon the price per share of Company Stock to be received
by other shareholders of the Company in the Change in Control.
10
RESTRICTED STOCK
UNITS
(a)
Vesting
Date
At the
time of the grant of Restricted Stock Units, the Committee shall establish a
Vesting Date or Vesting Dates with respect to such shares. The
Committee may divide such shares into classes and assign a different Vesting
Date for each class. Provided that all conditions to the vesting of a
Restricted Stock Unit imposed pursuant to Section 10(c) are satisfied, and
except as provided in Section 10(d), upon the occurrence of the Vesting
Date with respect to a Restricted Stock Unit, such Restricted Stock Unit shall
vest and shares of Stock will be delivered pursuant to Section
10(c).
(b)
Benefit
Upon Vesting
Upon the
vesting of a Restricted Stock Unit, the Participant shall be entitled to receive
one unrestricted, fully transferable share of Stock for each Restricted Stock
Unit scheduled to be paid out on such date and not previously forfeited, or, in
the sole discretion of the Committee, an amount, payable within 2 ½ months of
the date on which such Restricted Stock Units vests, equal to the Fair Market
Value of a share of Company Stock on the date on which such Restricted Stock
Unit vests. Notwithstanding the foregoing, shares of Company Stock
issued may be subject to restrictions on transfer as a result of applicable
securities laws or pursuant to Section 15.
(c)
Conditions
to Vesting
At the
time of the grant of Restricted Stock Units, the Committee may impose such
restrictions or conditions to the vesting of such Restricted Stock Units as it,
in its absolute discretion, deems appropriate. By way of example and
not by way of limitation, the Committee may require, as a condition to the
vesting of any class or classes of Restricted Stock Units, that the Participant
or the Company achieves such performance goals as the Committee may specify
under Section 12.
(d)
Effect of
Termination of Employment
(1)
Unless
the applicable Award Agreement or the Committee determines otherwise, Restricted
Stock Units that have not vested, together with any dividends credited on such
Restricted Stock Units, shall be forfeited upon the Participant’s termination of
employment for any reason other than Cause.
(2)
In the
event of the termination of a Participant’s employment for Cause, all Restricted
Stock Units granted to such Participant which have not vested as of the date of
such termination shall immediately be forfeited, together with any dividends
credited on such shares.
(e)
Effect of
Change in Control
Unless
the Award Agreement provides or the Committee determines otherwise, upon the
occurrence of a Change in Control all outstanding Restricted Stock Units which
have not theretofore vested shall immediately vest. In addition, in
the event of a Change in Control, the Committee may in its discretion, cancel
any outstanding Restricted Stock Units and pay to the holders thereof, in cash
or stock, or any combination thereof, the value of such Restricted Stock Units
based upon the price per share of Company Stock to be received by other
shareholders of the Company in the Change in Control.
11
STOCK
BONUSES
In the
event that the Committee grants a Stock Bonus, a certificate for the shares of
Company Stock comprising such Stock Bonus shall be issued in the name of the
Participant to whom such grant was made and delivered to such Participant as
soon as practicable after the date on which such Stock Bonus is
payable.
12
PERFORMANCE-BASED
AWARDS
(a)
Purpose.
The
purpose of this Section 12 is to provide the Committee the ability to qualify
Incentive Awards as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation. If the
Committee, in its discretion, decides to grant a Performance-Based Award to a
Covered Employee, the provisions of this Section 12 shall control over any
contrary provision contained in Sections 7, 8, 9 and 10; provided, however, that
the Committee may in its discretion grant Incentive Awards to Covered Employees
and to other Participants that are based on Performance Criteria or Performance
Goals but that do not satisfy the requirements of this Section 12.
(b)
Applicability.
This
Section 12 shall apply only to those Covered Employees selected by the Committee
to receive Performance-Based Awards. The designation of a Covered
Employee as a Participant for a Performance Period shall not in any manner
entitle the Participant to receive an Incentive Award for the
period. Moreover, designation of a Covered Employee as a Participant
for a particular Performance Period shall not require designation of such
Covered Employee as a Participant in any subsequent Performance Period and
designation of one Covered Employee as a Participant shall not require
designation of any other Covered Employees as a Participant in such period or in
any other period.
(c)
Procedures
with Respect to Performance-Based Awards.
To the
extent necessary to comply with the Qualified Performance-Based Compensation
requirements of Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code, with respect to any Incentive
Award granted under Sections 7, 8, 9 and 10 which may be granted to one or more
Covered Employees, no later than ninety (90) days following the commencement of
any fiscal year in question or any other designated fiscal period or period of
service (or such other time as may be required or permitted by Section 162(m) of
the Code), the Committee shall, in writing, (a) designate one or more Covered
Employees, (b) select the Performance Criteria applicable to the Performance
Period, (c) establish the Performance Goals, and amounts of such Awards, as
applicable, which may be earned for such Performance Period, and (d) specify the
relationship between Performance Criteria and the Performance Goals and the
amounts of such Awards, as applicable, to be earned by each Covered Employee for
such Performance Period. Following the completion of each Performance
Period, the Committee shall certify in writing whether the applicable
Performance Goals have been achieved for such Performance Period. In
determining the amount earned by a Covered Employee, the Committee shall have
the right to reduce or eliminate (but not to increase) the amount payable at a
given level of performance to take into account additional factors that the
Committee may deem relevant to the assessment of individual or corporate
performance for the Performance Period.
(d)
Payment
of Performance-Based Awards.
Unless
otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, a Participant must be
employed by the Company or a Subsidiary on the day a Performance-Based Award for
such Performance Period is paid to the Participant. Furthermore, a
Participant shall be eligible to receive payment pursuant to a Performance-Based
Award for a Performance Period only if, and to the extent, the Performance Goals
for such period are achieved.
(e)
Additional
Limitations.
Notwithstanding
any other provision of the Plan, any Incentive Award which is granted to a
Covered Employee and is intended to constitute Qualified Performance-Based
Compensation shall be subject to any additional limitations set forth in Section
162(m) of the Code (including any amendment to Section 162(m) of the Code) or
any regulations or rulings issued thereunder that are requirements for
qualification as qualified performance-based compensation as described in
Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code, and the Plan shall be deemed amended to the
extent necessary to conform to such requirements.
13
RIGHTS AS A
STOCKHOLDER
No person
shall have any rights as a stockholder with respect to any shares of Company
Stock covered by or relating to any Incentive Award until the date of issuance
of a stock certificate with respect to such shares.
Except as
otherwise expressly provided in Section 3(d), no adjustment to any
Incentive Award shall be made for dividends or other rights for which the record
date occurs prior to the date such stock certificate is issued.
14
DEFERRAL OF
AWARDS
The
Committee may permit or require the deferral of payment or settlement of any
Restricted Stock Unit or Stock Bonus subject to such rules and procedures as it
may establish. Payment or settlement of Options or SARs may not be
deferred unless such deferral would not cause the provisions of Section 409A of
the Code to be violated.
15
RESTRICTION ON TRANSFER OF
SHARES
The
Committee may impose, either in the Award Agreement or at the time shares of
Company Stock are issued in settlement of an Incentive Award, restrictions on
the ability of the Participant to sell or transfer such shares of Company
Stock.
16
NO SPECIAL EMPLOYMENT
RIGHTS; NO RIGHT TO INCENTIVE AWARD
Nothing
contained in the Plan or any Award Agreement shall confer upon any Participant
any right with respect to the continuation of employment by the Company or
interfere in any way with the right of the Company, subject to the terms of any
separate employment agreement to the contrary, at any time to terminate such
employment or to increase or decrease the compensation of the
Participant.
No person
shall have any claim or right to receive an Incentive Award
hereunder. The Committee’s granting of an Incentive Award to a
Participant at any time shall neither require the Committee to grant any other
Incentive Award to such Participant or other person at any time nor preclude the
Committee from making subsequent grants to such Participant or any other
person.
17
SECURITIES
MATTERS
(a)
The
Company shall be under no obligation to effect the registration pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933 of any interests in the Plan or any shares of Company
Stock to be issued hereunder or to effect similar compliance under any state
laws. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Company
shall not be obligated to cause to be issued or delivered any certificates
evidencing shares of Company Stock pursuant to the Plan unless and until the
Company is advised by its counsel that the issuance and delivery of such
certificates is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations of
governmental authority and the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange or
any other securities exchange or automated quotation system on which shares of
Company Stock are listed. Certificates evidencing shares of Company
Stock issued pursuant to the terms hereof, may bear such legends, as the
Committee or the Company, in its sole discretion, deems necessary or desirable
to insure compliance with applicable securities laws.
(b)
The
transfer of any shares of Company Stock hereunder shall be effective only at
such time as counsel to the Company shall have determined that the issuance and
delivery of such shares is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations
of governmental authority and the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange or
any other securities exchange or automated quotation system on which shares of
Company Stock are listed. The Committee may, in its sole discretion,
defer the effectiveness of any transfer of shares of Company stock hereunder in
order to allow the issuance of such shares to be made pursuant to registration
or an exemption from registration or other methods for compliance available
under federal or state securities laws. The Company shall inform the
Participant in writing of the Committee’s decision to defer the effectiveness of
a transfer. During the period of such a deferral in connection with
the exercise of an Option, the Participant may, by written notice, withdraw such
exercise and obtain the refund of any amount paid with respect
thereto.
(c)
It is
intended that the Plan be applied and administered in compliance with Rule
16b-3. If any provision of the Plan would be in violation of Rule
16b-3 if applied as written, such provision shall not have effect as written and
shall be given effect so as to comply with Rule 16b-3, as determined by the
Committee. The Committee is authorized to amend the Plan and to make
any such modifications to Award Agreements to comply with Rule 16b-3, as it may
be amended from time to time, and to make any other such amendments or
modifications deemed necessary or appropriate to better accomplish the purposes
of the Plan in light of any amendments made to Rule 16b-3.
18
WITHHOLDING
TAXES
Whenever
cash is to be paid pursuant to an Incentive Award, the Company shall have the
right to deduct therefrom an amount sufficient to satisfy any federal, state and
local withholding tax requirements related thereto.
Whenever
shares of Company Stock are to be delivered pursuant to an Incentive Award, the
Company shall have the right to require the Participant to remit to the Company
in cash an amount sufficient to satisfy any federal, state and local withholding
tax requirements related thereto. With the approval of the Committee,
which it shall have sole discretion to grant and which approval may be evidenced
by the presence in the Award Agreement of an appropriate reference to such
right, a Participant may satisfy the foregoing requirement by electing to have
the Company withhold from delivery shares of Company Stock having a value equal
to the minimum amount of tax required to be withheld. Such shares
shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date as of which the amount of
tax to be withheld is determined. Fractional share amounts shall be
settled in cash. Such a withholding election may be made with respect
to all or any portion of the shares to be delivered pursuant to an Incentive
Award. Any tax withholding above the minimum amount of tax required
to be withheld must be deducted from other amounts payable to the Participant or
must be paid in cash by the Participant.
19
NOTIFICATION OF ELECTION
UNDER SECTION 83(b) OF THE CODE
If any
Participant shall, in connection with the acquisition of shares of Company Stock
under the Plan, make the election permitted under Section 83(b) of the Code
(i.e., an election to include in gross income in the year of transfer the
amounts specified in Section 83(b)) and permitted under the terms of the
Award Agreement, such Participant shall notify the Company of such election
within ten days of filing notice of the election with the Internal Revenue
Service, in addition to any filing and notification required pursuant to
regulations issued under the authority of Code Section 83(b).
20
NOTIFICATION UPON
DISQUALIFYING DISPOSITION UNDER SECTION 421(b) OF THE
CODE
Each
Award Agreement with respect to an Incentive Stock Option shall require the
Participant to notify the Company of any disposition of shares of Company Stock
issued pursuant to the exercise of such Option under the circumstances described
in Section 421(b) of the Code (relating to certain disqualifying
dispositions) within ten days of such disposition.
21
AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF
THE PLAN
The Board
of Directors may, at any time, suspend or terminate the Plan or revise or amend
it in any respect whatsoever; provided, however, that stockholder approval shall
be required if and to the extent required by Rule 16b-3 or by any comparable or
successor exemption under which the Board of Directors believes it is
appropriate for the Plan to qualify, or if and to the extent the Board of
Directors determines that such approval is appropriate for purposes of
satisfying Section 162(m), Section 422 or Section 409A of the Code or
any applicable rule or listing standard of any stock exchange, automated
quotation system or similar organization. Nothing herein shall
restrict the Committee’s ability to exercise its discretionary authority
pursuant to Section 4, which discretion may be exercised without amendment
to the Plan. No action hereunder may, without the consent of a
Participant, reduce the Participant’s rights under any outstanding Incentive
Award.
22
NO OBLIGATION TO
EXERCISE
The grant
to a Participant of an Option or SAR shall impose no obligation upon such
Participant to exercise such Option or SAR.
23
TRANSFERS UPON DEATH;
NONASSIGNABILITY
Upon the
death of a Participant outstanding Incentive Awards granted to such Participant
may be exercised only by the executor or administrator of the Participant’s
estate or by a person who shall have acquired the right to such exercise by will
or by the laws of descent and distribution. No transfer of an
Incentive Award by will or the laws of descent and distribution shall be
effective to bind the Company unless the Company shall have been furnished with
(a) written notice thereof and with a copy of the Will and/or such evidence
as the Committee may deem necessary to establish the validity of the transfer
and (b) an agreement by the transferee to comply with all the terms and
conditions of the Incentive Award that are or would have been applicable to the
Participant and to be bound by the acknowledgments made by the Participant in
connection with the grant of the Incentive Award.
Except as
otherwise provided in this Plan, no Incentive Award or interest in it may be
transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated by the Participant, whether by
operation of law or otherwise, or be made subject to execution, attachment or
similar process.
24
EXPENSES AND
RECEIPTS
The
expenses of the Plan shall be paid by the Company. Any proceeds
received by the Company in connection with any Incentive Award will be used for
general corporate purposes.
25
FAILURE TO
COMPLY
In
addition to the remedies of the Company elsewhere provided for herein, failure
by a Participant (or beneficiary) to comply with any of the terms and conditions
of the Plan or the applicable Award Agreement, unless such failure is remedied
by such Participant (or beneficiary) within ten days after notice of such
failure by the Committee, shall be grounds for the cancellation and forfeiture
of such Incentive Award, in whole or in part, as the Committee, in its sole
discretion, may determine.
26
EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM OF
PLAN
The Plan
shall be effective as of the Effective Date. Unless earlier
terminated by the Board of Directors, the right to grant Incentive Awards under
the Plan will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the Effective
Date. Incentive Awards outstanding at Plan termination will remain in
effect according to their terms and the provisions of the Plan.
27
APPLICABLE
LAW
Except to
the extent preempted by any applicable federal law, the Plan will be construed
and administered in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without
reference to the principles of conflicts of laws thereunder.