PART I
ITEM
1.
|
IDENTITY
OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND
ADVISERS
|
Not
required.
ITEM
2.
|
OFFER
STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
|
Not
required.
A. Selected
financial data
The
selected financial information set forth below has been derived from our audited
financial statements (i) for the period from October 16, 2007 (date of
inception) to December 31, 2007 and (ii) for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The information is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with our
audited financial statements and notes thereto contained elsewhere herein. The
financial results should not be construed as indicative of financial results for
subsequent periods. See “Item 4. Information on the Company” and “Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”
Selected
Financial Data
(Expressed
in United States Dollars)
|
|
For
the period ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Statement
of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formation
costs
|
|
$
|
(4,728
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
(18,700
|
)
|
|
|
(327,935
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
loss
|
|
|
23,428
|
|
|
|
327,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
733,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(492,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust
account interest allocable to shares subject to possible
redemption
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(58,996
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (Loss) attributable to ordinary stockholders
|
|
$
|
(23,428
|
)
|
|
$
|
(145,541
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per ordinary share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
As
of December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
628
|
|
|
$
|
77,128
|
|
Money
market funds held in trust
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
40,855,363
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
200,585
|
|
|
|
40,942,029
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
199,013
|
|
|
|
1,794,302
|
|
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
1,572
|
|
|
|
22,877,535
|
|
B. Capitalization
and Indebtedness
Not
required.
C. Reasons
for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not
required.
D. Risk
Factors
On April 9, 2009, pursuant to the terms
of a share exchange agreement dated February 4, 2009 and amended March 11, 2009,
AutoChina acquired all of the outstanding securities of ACG. On that day, we
filed our Second Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association
that, among other things, changed our name to “AutoChina International Limited”
and removed certain provisions that, giving effect to AutoChina’s acquisition of
ACG, were no longer applicable.
This annual report on Form 20-F covers
the year ended December 31, 2008, which precedes our acquisition of
ACG. Accordingly, we are presenting information in this report for
each of AutoChina and ACG for the year ended December 31, 2008. The
following discussion relates to risks associated with AutoChina and ACG’s
business following the acquisition on April 9, 2009.
Risks Associated with Our
Business
If outstanding
warrants are exercised, the underlying ordinary shares will be eligible for
future resale in the public market. “Market overhang” from the warrants results
in dilution and could reduce the market price of the ordinary
shares
.
Outstanding
warrants and unit purchase options to purchase an aggregate of 8,962,500
ordinary shares issued in connection with AutoChina’s initial public offering
and the private placement that took place immediately prior to the initial
public offering became exercisable after AutoChina’s acquisition of ACG on April
9, 2009. If they are exercised, a substantial number of additional shares of
AutoChina’s ordinary shares will be eligible for resale in the public market,
which may reduce the market price.
Because AutoChina
does not intend to pay dividends on its ordinary shares, shareholders will
benefit from an investment in AutoChina’s ordinary shares only if it appreciates
in value
.
AutoChina
has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its ordinary shares. AutoChina
currently intends to retain all future earnings, if any, for use in the
operations and expansion of the business. As a result, AutoChina does not
anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future
determination as to the declaration and payment of cash dividends will be at the
discretion of AutoChina’s Board of Directors and will depend on factors
AutoChina’s Board of Directors deems relevant, including among others,
AutoChina’s results of operations, financial condition and cash requirements,
business prospects, and the terms of AutoChina’s credit facilities and other
financing arrangements. Accordingly, realization of a gain on shareholders’
investments will depend on the appreciation of the price of AutoChina’s ordinary
shares. There is no guarantee that AutoChina’s ordinary shares will appreciate
in value.
AutoChina’s
securities are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, which may limit the liquidity
and price of its securities more than if the securities were quoted or listed on
the Nasdaq market
.
AutoChina’s
securities are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, a NASD-sponsored and operated
inter-dealer automated quotation system. Quotation of AutoChina’s securities on
the OTC Bulletin Board will limit the liquidity and price of its securities more
than if the securities were quoted or listed on Nasdaq. AutoChina is in the
process of applying for listing on Nasdaq, however there can be no assurance
that AutoChina will be approved for listing on Nasdaq or that such listing, if
approved, will be maintained.
AutoChina may
choose to redeem its outstanding warrants at a time that is disadvantageous to
the warrant holders
.
Subject
to there being a current prospectus under the Securities Act of 1933, AutoChina
may redeem all of its outstanding warrants at any time at a price of $.01 per
warrant, upon a minimum of 30 days prior written notice of redemption if, and
only if, the last sale price of AutoChina’s ordinary shares equals or exceeds
$11.50 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period ending
three business days before AutoChina sends the notice of redemption. Calling all
of AutoChina’s outstanding warrants for redemption could force the warrant
holders:
|
·
|
to
exercise the warrants and pay the exercise price for such warrants at a
time when it may be disadvantageous for the holders to do
so;
|
|
·
|
to
sell the warrants at the then current market price when they might
otherwise wish to hold the warrants;
or
|
|
·
|
to
accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the warrants are
called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market
value of the warrants.
|
AutoChina’s
warrant holders may not be able to exercise their warrants, which may create
liability for AutoChina
.
Holders
of the warrants AutoChina issued in its initial public offering and private
placement will be able to receive shares upon exercise of the warrants only if
(i) a current registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 relating
to the shares of its ordinary shares underlying the warrants is then effective
and (ii) such shares are qualified for sale or exempt from qualification under
the applicable securities laws of the states in which the various holders of
warrants reside. Although AutoChina has agreed to use its best efforts to
maintain a current registration statement covering the shares underlying the
warrants to the extent required by federal securities laws, and AutoChina
intends to comply with such agreement, AutoChina cannot assure you that it will
be able to do so. In addition, some states may not permit AutoChina to register
the shares issuable upon exercise of its warrants for sale. The value of the
warrants will be greatly reduced if a registration statement covering the shares
issuable upon the exercise of the warrants is not kept current or if the
securities are not qualified, or exempt from qualification, in the states in
which the holders of warrants reside. Holders of warrants who reside in
jurisdictions in which the shares underlying the warrants are not qualified and
in which there is no exemption will be unable to exercise their warrants and
would either have to sell their warrants in the open market or allow them to
expire unexercised. If and when the warrants become redeemable by AutoChina,
AutoChina may exercise its redemption right even if AutoChina is unable to
qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities
laws. Since AutoChina’s obligations in this regard are subject to a “best
efforts” standard, it is possible that, even if AutoChina is able to
successfully assert a defense to a claim by warrant holders due to the
impossibility of registration, a court may impose monetary damages on AutoChina
to compensate warrant holders due to the change in circumstances that led to
AutoChina being unable to fulfill its obligations.
Risks Related to Operations
in China
Risks
related to ACG’s Business
ACG depends on
its ability to enter into and renew leases for most of its properties. In
addition, certain lands or buildings where ACG operates its business in China do
not have proper title or the head lessor’s consent for a sub-lease and ACG may
fail to, or need to incur further expenses or time to, secure legal right to use
certain lands or buildings which it leases in China
.
ACG
requires substantial storage facilities to store its inventory for motor
vehicles (i.e. cars and commercial vehicles). ACG rents or leases most of its
storage facilities and dealership lots from third parties under tenancy or lease
agreements. Depending on market conditions for real estate, landlords or lessors
may increase rentals to a rate not acceptable by ACG and which may lead to ACG
not renewing the tenancies or leases upon their expirations. If these tenancies
or leases are terminated and if there are no ready alternative locations of
storage facilities and dealership lots for ACG to store its inventory and/or
sell motor vehicles or if ACG is forced to accept the increased rentals or are
not able to relocate to a suitable place, ACG’s business, results of operations
and financial conditions could be materially and adversely
affected.
Approximately
117 of 129 parcels of land and/or buildings in China leased and occupied by ACG
for its business operations have certain title defects or lack documentation
supporting claim to title and the use of the leased premises may be challenged
and ACG may need to relocate its existing business operations.
Furthermore,
if such plots of land leased to ACG are collectively-owned land and ACG operates
its business on them for non-agricultural uses without special permission,
subject to the Land Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China, the
administrative departments at or above county level may order the termination of
such leases.
In any of
the above events, ACG may be required to terminate the existing leases and
relocate its existing business operations. There can be no assurance that ACG
can replace the existing leases with other comparative alternative premises
without any material adverse effect on its operations.
The automotive
and truck retailing industry is sensitive to changing economic conditions and
various other factors. ACG’s business and results of operations are
substantially dependent on new vehicle sales levels in China and in its
particular geographic markets and the level of gross profit margins that it can
achieve on its sales of new vehicles, all of which are very difficult to
predict
.
ACG
believes that many factors affect sales of new vehicles and automotive
retailers’ gross profit margins in China and in its particular geographic
markets, including the economy, inflation, recession or economic slowdown,
consumer confidence, housing markets, fuel prices, credit availability, the
level of manufacturers’ production capacity, manufacturer incentives (and
consumers’ reaction to such offers), intense industry competition, interest
rates, the level of personal discretionary spending, product quality,
affordability and innovation, employment/unemployment rates, the number of
consumers whose vehicle leases are expiring, and the length of consumer loans on
existing vehicles. Changes in interest rates could significantly impact industry
new vehicle sales and vehicle affordability, due to the direct relationship
between interest rates and monthly loan payments, a critical factor for many
vehicle buyers, and the impact interest rates can have on customers’ borrowing
capacity and disposable income. If there is a decline in the availability of
credit for car purchasers provided by third-party financing companies or if ACG
has insufficient resources to purchase adequate numbers of commercial vehicles
and to finance their installment sales to customers, the ability of certain
customers to purchase vehicles could be limited, resulting in a decline in sales
or profits. In addition, the levels of commercial vehicle sales is significantly
dependent on the level of shipping of basic materials, such as coal and
grain.
The
overall demand for vehicles increased significantly in China from 2001 to 2008.
However, recently, certain adverse financial developments have impacted the
global financial markets. Theses developments include a general slowing of
economic growth both in China and globally, substantial volatility in equity
securities markets, and volatility and tightening of liquidity in credit
markets. While ACG conducts market research on the demand for automobiles in
China, it is difficult for industry participants, including ACG, to predict how
long these conditions will exist and how they will affect the automobile
industry and its business. As a result, these developments could continue to
present risks for an extended period of time for ACG, including a potential
slowdown in its sales to customers, increase in interest expense on its bank
borrowings, or reduction of the amount of banking facilities currently available
to it.
If this
economic downturn continues, ACG’s business, financial condition and results of
operations would likely be adversely affected, its cash position may further
erode and it may be required to seek new financing, which may not be obtainable
on acceptable terms or at all. ACG may also be required to reduce its capital
expenditures, which in turn could hinder its ability to implement its business
plan and to improve its productivity.
ACG is dependent
upon the success and continued financial viability of the vehicle manufacturers
and distributors with which it holds franchises
.
The
success of ACG’s stores is dependent on vehicle manufacturers in several key
respects. First, ACG relies exclusively on the various vehicle manufacturers for
its new vehicle inventory. ACG’s ability to sell new vehicles is dependent on a
vehicle manufacturer’s ability to produce and allocate to its stores an
attractive, high quality, and desirable product mix at the right time in order
to satisfy customer demand. Second, manufacturers generally support their
franchisees by providing direct financial assistance in various areas,
including, among others, inventory financing assistance and advertising
assistance. Third, manufacturers provide product warranties and, in some cases,
service contracts, to customers. ACG’s stores perform warranty and service
contract work for vehicles under manufacturer product warranties and service
contracts, and directly bill the manufacturer as opposed to invoicing the store
customer. At any particular time, it has significant receivables from
manufacturers for warranty and service work performed for customers. In
addition, ACG relies on manufacturers to varying extents for original equipment
manufactured replacement parts, training, product brochures and point of sale
materials, and other items for its stores.
The core
brands of vehicles that ACG sells are manufactured by BMW, Audi, Hyundai, Ford,
General Motors (Chevrolet, Buick and Cadillac), ROEWE, Mazda, Ruida Kia, FAW
Car, Qingling, Peugeot and FAW Toyota. In particular, Audi represented over 24%
of ACG’s new vehicle revenue in 2008. ACG is subject to a concentration of risk
in the event of financial distress, including potential bankruptcy, of a major
vehicle manufacturer. In the event of such a bankruptcy, among other things, (i)
the manufacturer could attempt to terminate all or certain of its franchises,
and ACG may not receive adequate compensation for them, (ii) ACG may not be able
to collect some or all of its significant receivables that are due from such
manufacturers and it may be subject to preference claims relating to payments
made by manufacturers prior to bankruptcy, (iii) ACG may not be able to obtain
financing for its new vehicle inventory, or arrange financing for its customers
for their vehicle purchases and leases, with the manufacturer’s captive finance
subsidiary, which may cause ACG to finance its new vehicle inventory, and
arrange financing for its customers, with alternate finance sources on less
favorable terms, and (iv) consumer demand for their products could be reduced.
These events may result in receivables due from such manufacturers and adversely
impact its results of operations. In addition, vehicle manufacturers may be
adversely impacted by economic downturns or recessions, significant declines in
the sales of their new vehicles, increases in interest rates, declines in their
credit ratings, labor strikes or similar disruptions (including within their
major suppliers), supply shortages or rising raw material costs, rising employee
benefit costs, adverse publicity that may reduce consumer demand for their
products (including due to bankruptcy), product defects, vehicle recall
campaigns, litigation, poor product mix or unappealing vehicle design,
governmental laws and regulations, or other adverse events.
ACG’s new vehicle
sales are impacted by the consumer incentive and marketing programs of vehicle
manufacturers
.
Most
vehicle manufacturers from time to time have established various incentive and
marketing programs designed to spur consumer demand for their vehicles. In
addition, certain manufacturers offer extended product warranties or free
service programs to consumers. From time to time, manufacturers modify and
discontinue these dealer assistance and consumer incentive and marketing
programs, which could significantly reduce ACG’s new vehicle and aftermarket
product sales, consolidated results of operations, and cash flows.
ACG is subject to
restrictions imposed by, and significant influence from, vehicle manufacturers
that may adversely impact its business, financial condition, results of
operations, cash flows, and prospects, including its ability to acquire
additional stores
.
Vehicle
manufacturers and distributors with whom ACG holds franchises have significant
influence over the operations of ACG’s stores. The terms and conditions of its
framework, franchise, and related agreements and the manufacturers’ interests
and objectives may, in certain circumstances, conflict with its interests and
objectives.
ACG’s
framework, franchise, and related agreements also grant the manufacturer the
right to terminate or compel ACG to sell its franchise for a variety of reasons
(including uncured performance deficiencies, any unapproved change of ownership
or management, or any unapproved transfer of franchise rights or impairment of
financial standing or failure to meet capital requirements), subject to
applicable franchise laws. From time to time, certain major manufacturers assert
sales and customer satisfaction performance deficiencies under the terms of such
framework and franchise agreements. Additionally, ACG’s framework agreements
contain restrictions regarding a change in control, which may be outside of its
control. While ACG believes that it will be able to renew all of its franchise
agreements, it cannot guarantee that all of its franchise agreements will be
renewed or that the terms of the renewals will be favorable to it. ACG cannot
assure you that its stores will be able to comply with manufacturers’ sales,
customer satisfaction performance, and other requirements in the future, which
may affect its ability to acquire new stores or renew its franchise agreements,
or subject it to other adverse actions, including termination or compelled sale
of a franchise, any of which would significantly impact its ability to sell
affected vehicles. Furthermore, ACG relies on the protection of state franchise
laws in the states in which it operates and if those laws are repealed or
weakened, its framework and related agreements may become more susceptible to
termination, non-renewal, or renegotiation.
ACG’s operations,
including, without limitation, its sales of finance and insurance, are subject
to extensive governmental laws and regulations
.
The
automotive retailing industry, including ACG’s facilities and operations, is
subject to a wide range of central and local laws and regulations, such as those
relating to motor vehicle sales, retail installment sales, leasing, sales of
finance and insurance, licensing, consumer protection, consumer privacy,
escheatment, environmental, vehicle emissions and fuel economy, health and
safety, wage-hour and other employment practices. Specifically with respect to
motor vehicle sales, retail installment sales, leasing, and the sale of finance
and insurance at its stores, ACG is subject to various laws and regulations, the
violation of which could subject it to lawsuits or governmental investigations
and adverse publicity, in addition to administrative, civil, or criminal
sanctions. The violation of other laws and regulations to which ACG are subject
also can result in administrative, civil, or criminal sanctions against it,
which may include a cease and desist order against the subject operations or
even revocation or suspension of its license to operate the subject business, as
well as significant fines and penalties.
ACG may be
subject to broad liabilities arising from environmental protection
laws
.
ACG may
be subject to broad liabilities arising out of contamination at its currently
and formerly owned or operated facilities, at locations to which hazardous
substances were transported from such facilities, and at such locations related
to entities formerly affiliated with it. Although for some such liabilities ACG
believes it is entitled to indemnification from other entities, ACG cannot
assure you that such entities will view their obligations as it does, or will be
able to satisfy them.
ACG’s growth is
dependent upon the availability of suitable sites
.
ACG
leases a majority of the properties where its stores are located. If and when
ACG decides to open new stores, the inability to acquire suitable real estate,
either through lease or purchase, at favorable terms could limit the expansion
of its lot base and could limit its expansion strategy.
ACG’s
businesses are subject to seasonal fluctuations.
The third
quarter has historically been the slowest period for car and truck sales.
Conversely, the fourth quarter has historically been the busiest time for car
and truck sales. Therefore, ACG generally realizes a higher proportion of its
revenue and operating profit during the fourth quarter. The demand for repair,
maintenance and parts is not highly seasonal. If conditions arise that impair
vehicle sales during the fourth quarter, revenues for that year will be
significantly reduced.
Any security
breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of
confidential information, whether by ACG or by third-party service providers,
could damage its reputation, expose it to the risks of litigation and liability,
disrupt its business or otherwise harm its results of
operations
.
In the
normal course of business, ACG collects, processes and retains sensitive and
confidential customer information. Despite the security measures it has in
place, its facilities and systems, and those of third-party service providers,
could be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses,
misplaced or lost data, programming or human errors or other similar events. Any
security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized
disclosure of confidential information, whether by ACG or by third-party service
providers, could damage its reputation, expose it to the risks of litigation and
liability, disrupt its business or otherwise harm its results of
operations.
Automotive
manufacturers exercise significant control over ACG’s operations and ACG depends
on them in order to operate its business
.
Manufacturers
exercise a great degree of control over ACG’s operations. For example,
manufacturers can require ACG to meet specified standards of appearance, require
it to meet specified financial criteria such as maintenance of minimum net
working capital and, in some cases, minimum net worth, impose minimum customer
service and satisfaction standards, set standards regarding the maintenance of
inventories of vehicles and parts and govern the extent to which its businesses
can utilize the manufacturers’ names and trademarks. In many cases the
manufacturer must consent to the replacement of the principal.
ACG’s
manufacturers generally require that the premises meet defined image and
facility standards and may direct it to implement costly capital improvements as
a condition for renewing certain franchise agreements. All of these requirements
could impose significant capital expenditures on ACG in the
future
.
Pursuant
to ACG’s franchise agreements, its operations are required to maintain a certain
minimum working capital, as determined by the manufacturers. This requirement
could force ACG to utilize available capital to maintain manufacturer-required
working capital levels thereby limiting its ability to apply profits generated
from one subsidiary for use in other subsidiaries or, in some cases, at the
parent company. These factors, either alone or in combination, could cause ACG
to divert its financial resources to capital projects from uses that management
believes may be of higher long-term value to it.
ACG is subject to
a number of risks associated with importing vehicles
.
ACG’s
business involves the sale of new and used vehicles, vehicle parts or vehicles
composed of parts that are manufactured outside China. As a result, ACG’s
operations are subject to customary risks associated with imported merchandise,
including fluctuations in the value of currencies, import duties, exchange
controls, differing tax structures, trade restrictions, transportation costs,
work stoppages and general political and economic conditions in foreign
countries.
The
countries from which ACG’s vehicles and/or parts are imported may, from time to
time, impose new quotas, duties, tariffs or other restrictions, or adjust
presently prevailing quotas, duties or tariffs on imported merchandise. Any of
those impositions or adjustments could affect ACG’s operations and its ability
to purchase imported vehicles and parts at reasonable prices.
Substantial
competition in automotive sales and services may adversely affect ACG’s
profitability due to its need to lower prices to sustain sales and
profitability
.
The
automotive retail industry in China is highly competitive. Depending on the
geographic market, ACG competes with:
|
·
|
franchised
automotive dealerships in its markets that sell similar makes of new and
used vehicles that it offers, occasionally at lower prices than it
does;
|
|
·
|
other
national or regional affiliated groups of franchised
dealerships;
|
|
·
|
private
market buyers and sellers of used vehicles;
and
|
|
·
|
independent
service and repair shops.
|
ACG may
face significant competition as it strives to gain market share. Some of ACG’s
competitors may have greater financial, marketing and personnel resources and
lower overhead and sales costs than it has. ACG typically relies on advertising,
merchandising, sales expertise, service reputation and dealership location in
order to sell new vehicles. Although its franchise agreements with manufacturers
grant ACG the right to sell their products within certain geographic areas, its
revenues and profitability may be materially and adversely affected if competing
dealerships expand their market share or are awarded additional franchises by
manufacturers that supply its dealerships. Additionally, market practice in the
PRC allows multiple non-exclusive dealerships distributing the same brand of
motor vehicles in the same city or region.
ACG also
competes with other independent dealers, and to a lesser degree with (i) the
used vehicle retail operations of franchised automotive dealerships, (ii)
independent used vehicle dealers, and (iii) individuals who sell used vehicles
in private transactions. ACG competes for both the purchase and resale of used
vehicles. ACG’s competitors may sell the same or similar makes of vehicles that
it offers in the same or similar markets at competitive prices. Increased
competition in the market, including new entrants to the market, could result in
increased wholesale costs for used vehicles and lower-than expected vehicle
sales and margins. Further, if any of ACG’s competitors seek to gain or retain
market share by reducing prices for used vehicles, it would likely reduce its
prices in order to remain competitive, which may result in a decrease in its
sales and profitability and require a change in its operating
strategies.
In
addition to competition for vehicle sales, ACG’s dealerships compete with
independent garages for non-warranty repair and routine maintenance business.
ACG’s dealerships compete with other automotive dealers, service stores and
automobile parts retailers in their parts operations. ACG believes that the
principal competitive factors in service and parts sales are the quality of
customer service, the use of factory-approved replacement parts, familiarity
with a manufacturer’s brands and models, convenience, the competence of
technicians, location, and price.
Claims that the
software products and information systems that ACG relies on are infringing on
the intellectual property rights of others could increase its expenses or
inhibit it from offering certain services, which could adversely affect its
results of operations
.
A number
of entities, including some of ACG’s competitors, have sought, or may in the
future obtain, patents and other intellectual property rights that cover or
affect software products and other components of information systems that ACG
relies on to operate its business.
Litigation
may be necessary to determine the validity and scope of third-party rights or to
defend against claims of infringement. If a court determines that one or more of
the software products or other components of information systems ACG uses
infringe on intellectual property owned by others or ACG agrees to settle such a
dispute, it may be liable for money damages. In addition, ACG may be required to
cease using those products and components unless it obtains licenses from the
owners of the intellectual property, redesign those products and components in
such a way as to avoid infringement or cease altogether the use of those
products and components. Each of these alternatives could increase ACG’s
expenses materially or impact the marketability of its services. Any litigation,
regardless of the outcome, could result in substantial costs and diversion of
resources and could have a material adverse effect on ACG’s business. In
addition, a third-party intellectual property owner might not allow ACG to use
its intellectual property at any price, or on terms acceptable to it, which
could compromise ACG’s competitive position.
ACG relies on an
adequate supply of skilled field personnel
.
In order
to continue to provide high quality repair and maintenance services, ACG
requires an adequate supply of skilled field managers and technicians. Trained
and experienced automotive field personnel are in high demand, and may be in
short supply in some areas. ACG cannot assure that it will be able to attract,
motivate and maintain an adequate skilled workforce necessary to operate its
existing and future stores efficiently, or that labor expenses will not increase
as a result of a shortage in the supply of skilled field personnel, thereby
adversely impacting its financial performance. While the automotive repair
industry generally operates with high field employee turnover, any material
increases in employee turnover rates in ACG’s stores or any widespread employee
dissatisfaction could also have a material adverse effect on its business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Store
closings result in unexpected costs that could adversely affect ACG’s results of
operations.
From time
to time, in the ordinary course of ACG’s business, it closes certain stores,
generally based on considerations of store profitability, competition, strategic
factors and other considerations. Closing a store could subject ACG to costs
including the write-down of leasehold improvements, equipment, furniture and
fixtures. In addition, ACG could remain liable for future lease
obligations.
ACG’s business is
affected by advances in automotive technology
.
The
demand for ACG’s parts and repair and maintenance services could be adversely
affected by continuing developments in automotive technology. Automotive
manufacturers are producing cars that last longer and require service and
maintenance at less frequent intervals in certain cases. Quality improvement of
manufacturers’ original equipment parts has in the past reduced, and may in the
future reduce, demand for ACG’s products and services, adversely affecting its
sales. For example, manufacturers’ use of stainless steel exhaust components has
significantly increased the life of those parts, thereby decreasing the demand
for exhaust repairs and replacements. Longer and more comprehensive warranty or
service programs offered by automobile manufacturers and other third parties
also could adversely affect the demand for ACG’s non-warranty repair and
maintenance services. In addition, advances in automotive technology continue to
require ACG to incur additional costs to update its diagnostic capabilities and
technical training programs.
Significant
defaults by financing customers could significantly reduce ACG’s
revenues
.
ACG’s
commercial vehicle sales and leasing business generates income from financing
customers. Although ACG does extensive pre-sale credit research on its customers
and has a security interest in its leased vehicles, if customers fail to make
payments when due ACG may not be able to fully recover the outstanding fee and
it could significantly reduce ACG’s revenues.
A
loss of distribution rights granted by ACG's suppliers, or any material disputes
between ACG and its suppliers may adversely affect the results of operations and
financial condition of ACG.
ACG
relies on dealership rights granted by motor vehicle manufacturers for
distribution of their products. All of these dealership or supply agreements are
not on an exclusive basis and have an expiration date.
These
dealership contracts are generally for one to three year terms and are subject
to termination by ACG or the principal with prior written notice in accordance
with the terms of such contracts. Complete or partial termination of these
distribution rights agreements could materially and adversely affect ACG's
business operations and financial performance. For example, such termination
could result from disagreements regarding differences between sales targets and
actual achievements, disputes regarding advertising and promotion expenses or
changes in business strategy. There can be no assurance that any particular
supplier will not terminate these distribution rights in the future. ACG may
also be unable to obtain or renew these dealership supply agreements on
commercially acceptable terms and may not be able to continue to distribute
these products after the expiration date.
In
addition, there may be a material dispute between ACG and a supplier in
connection with the performance of a party's obligations or the scope of a
party's responsibilities under the relevant dealership or supply agreements with
its motor vehicle principals or consumer product supplier.
If any of
the above happens, the business and operations of ACG may suffer and the
dealership agreements may even be terminated by mutual consent of the parties,
unilaterally or as a result of a material breach by one of them.
The loss of any
key members of the management team may impair ACG’s ability to identify and
secure new contracts with customers or otherwise manage its business
effectively
.
ACG’s
success depends, in part, on the continued contributions of its senior
management. In particular, Mr. Yong Hui Li has been appointed by the Board of
Directors to oversee and supervise the strategic direction and overall
performance of ACG.
ACG
relies on its senior management to manage its business successfully. In
addition, the relationships and reputation that members of ACG’s management team
have established and maintained with its customers contribute to ACG’s ability
to maintain good customer relations, which is important to the direct selling
strategy that ACG adopts. Employment contracts entered into between ACG and its
senior management cannot prevent its senior management from terminating their
employment, and the death, disability or resignation of Mr. Yong Hui Li or any
other member of ACG’s senior management team may impair ACG’s ability to
maintain business growth and identify and develop new business opportunities or
otherwise to manage its business effectively.
ACG relies on its
information technology, billing and credit control systems, and any problems
with these systems could interrupt ACG’s operations
.
ACG’s
business cannot be managed effectively without its integrated information
technology system. Accordingly, ACG runs various “real time” integrated
information technology management systems for its motor vehicle sales and
financing business. These systems include ACG Information Management System.
ACG’s operations are heavily dependent on its integrated information technology
system to enable it to manage its sales and services effectively.
In
addition, sophisticated billing and credit control systems are critical to ACG’s
ability to increase revenue streams, avoid revenue loss and potential credit
problems, and bill customers in a proper and timely manner. If adequate billing
and credit control systems and programs are unavailable, or if upgrades are
delayed or not introduced in a timely manner, or if ACG is unable to integrate
such systems and software programs into its billing and credit systems, ACG may
experience delayed billing which may negatively affect ACG’s cash flow and the
results of its operations.
In case
of a failure of ACG’s data storage system, ACG may lose critical operational or
billing data or important email correspondence with its customers and suppliers.
Any such data stored in the core data center may be lost if there is a lapse or
failure of the disaster recovery system in backing up these data, or if the
periodic offline backup is insufficient in frequency or scope. An interruption
or breakdown in ACG’s integrated information technology system may have a
material adverse effect on its business, financial conditions and results of
operations due to disruption of its operations.
Natural disasters
and adverse weather events can disrupt ACG’s business
.
ACG’s
stores are concentrated in provinces and regions in China, including primarily
Hebei, Shanxi, Shandong, Henan, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and Tianjin, in
which actual or threatened natural disasters and severe weather events (such as
severe snowstorms, earthquakes, fires and landslides) may disrupt store
operations, which may adversely impact its business, results of operations,
financial condition, and cash flows. In addition to business interruption, the
automotive retailing business is subject to substantial risk of property loss
due to the significant concentration of property values at store locations.
Although ACG has, subject to certain deductibles, limitations, and exclusions,
substantial insurance, it cannot assure you that it will not be exposed to
uninsured or underinsured losses that could have a material adverse effect on
its business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Additionally, ACG generally relies on third-party transportation operators and
distributors for the delivery of vehicles from the manufacturer to ACG’s stores.
Delivery may be disrupted for various reasons, many of which are beyond ACG’s
control, including natural disasters, weather conditions or social unrest and
strikes, which could lead to delayed or lost deliveries. For example, recently
the southern regions of China experienced the most severe winter weather in
nearly 50 years, causing, among other things, severe disruptions to all forms of
transportation for several weeks in late January and early February 2008. This
natural disaster also impacted the delivery of vehicles to stores. In addition,
transportation conditions are often generally difficult in some of the regions
where ACG sells automobiles and commercial vehicles. ACG currently does not have
business interruption insurance to offset these potential losses, delays and
risks, so a material interruption of its business operations could severely
damage its business.
ACG’s
ongoing expansion into commercial vehicle sales and leasing may be costly,
time-consuming and difficult. If ACG does not successfully expand this business,
its results of operations and prospects would not be as positive as
anticipated.
ACG’s
future success is dependent upon its ability to successfully expand its
commercial vehicle sales and leasing business which it commenced in April 2008.
ACG opened 103 commercial vehicle financing centers in 2008 and 2 additional
commercial vehicle financing centers in January 2009, and it plans to open an
additional 45 centers in China in 2009. ACG has limited experience with this
business and may not be able to expand its sales in its existing or new markets
due to a variety of factors, including the risk that customers in some areas may
be unfamiliar with its brand or the commercial vehicle sales and leasing
business model. Furthermore, ACG may fail to anticipate and address competitive
conditions in the commercial vehicle sales and lease market. These competitive
conditions may make it difficult or impossible for ACG to effectively expand
this business. If ACG’s expansion efforts in existing and new markets are
unsuccessful, its results of operations and prospects would be materially and
adversely affected.
If required
financing for ACG’s commercial leasing business were not available or not
available on acceptable terms, the commercial leasing business might not be able
to expand as quickly as expected, reducing ACG’s operating
results
.
ACG’s
ability to expand its commercial truck financing business is dependent on its
ability to purchase commercial trucks for resale. Presently, such financing is
arranged through financing arrangements with Beiguo Commercial Building Limited
(“Beiguo”). The terms provided by Beiguo are on terms which are more favorable
than ACG has historically been able to obtain from PRC commercial banks. However
there can be no assurance that ACG can continue to receive such financing from
Beiguo on such commercially favorable terms, or at all.
If
financing from Beiguo were not available, ACG would fund its commercial vehicle
purchases from its own cash reserves or financing provided by third-party
financial institutions. There can be no assurance that ACG will have sufficient
resources or be able to obtain adequate third party financing on as commercially
favorable terms as that provided by Beiguo or at all. If suitable financing were
not available, ACG would not be able to expand its commercial leasing business
in as quickly as expected.
ACG may not
succeed in identifying suitable acquisition targets, which could limit its
ability to expand its operations and service offerings and enhance its
competitiveness
.
ACG has
pursued and may in the future pursue strategic acquisition opportunities to
increase its scale and geographic presence and expand the number of its product
offerings. However, ACG may not be able to identify suitable acquisition or
investment candidates, or, even if it does identify suitable candidates, it may
not be able to complete those transactions on terms commercially favorable to it
or at all, which could limit its competitiveness and its growth
prospects.
ACG may face
unforeseen liabilities and have difficulty integrating the operations of
companies it acquires in the future
.
If ACG
acquires other companies in the future, it could face the following
risks:
|
·
|
difficulty
in assimilating the target company’s personnel, operations, products,
services and technology into its
operations;
|
|
·
|
the
presence of unforeseen or unrecorded
liabilities;
|
|
·
|
entry
into unfamiliar markets;
|
|
·
|
inability
to generate sufficient revenues to offset acquisition
costs;
|
|
·
|
tax
and accounting issues;
|
|
·
|
incurrence
of significantly higher capital expenditures and operating
expenses;
|
|
·
|
disrupting
its ongoing business;
|
|
·
|
impairing
relationships with employees, manufacturers and
customers;
|
|
·
|
incorrectly
valuing acquired entities; and
|
|
·
|
failing
to obtain or retain key personnel at new or acquired
dealerships.
|
In
addition, employees from acquired companies may decide not to work with ACG or
to leave shortly after joining it. These difficulties could disrupt ACG’s
ongoing business, distract its management and current employees and increase its
expenses, including write-offs or impairment charges. Acquired companies also
may not perform to ACG’s expectations for various reasons, including the loss of
key personnel, key distributors, key suppliers or key customers, and its
strategic focus may change. As a result, ACG may not realize the benefits it
anticipated from the acquisition. If ACG fails to integrate acquired businesses
or realize the expected benefits, it may lose the return on the investment in
these acquisitions or incur additional transaction costs and its operations may
be negatively impacted as a result. Further, any acquisition or investment that
ACG attempts, whether or not completed, or any media reports or rumors with
respect to any such transactions, may adversely affect its competitiveness, its
growth prospects, and the value of its ordinary shares.
ACG’s business is
capital intensive and ACG’s growth strategy may require additional capital that
may not be available on favorable terms or at all
.
ACG has,
in the past, entered into loan agreements in order to raise additional capital.
ACG’s business requires significant capital and although it believes that its
current cash, cash flow from operations and the cash of AutoChina will be
sufficient to meet its present and reasonably anticipated cash needs, it may, in
the future, require additional cash resources due to changed business
conditions, implementation of its strategy to expand its store network or other
investments or acquisitions it may decide to pursue. If ACG’s own financial
resources are insufficient to satisfy its capital requirements, it may seek to
sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain additional credit facilities
following the acquisition. The sale of additional equity securities could result
in dilution to ACG’s shareholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result
in increased debt service obligations and could require ACG to agree to
operating and financial covenants that would restrict its operations. Financing
may not be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to ACG, if at all. Any
failure by ACG to raise additional funds on terms favorable to it, or at all,
could limit its ability to expand its business operations and could harm its
overall business prospects.
Due to ACG’s
rapid growth in recent years, its past results may not be indicative of its
future performance and evaluating its business and prospects may be
difficult
.
AutoChina’s
business has grown and evolved rapidly in recent years as demonstrated by its
growth in net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to $6.1
million, from $2.2 million for the prior period in 2007. AutoChina may not be
able to achieve similar growth in future periods, and its historical operating
results may not provide a meaningful basis for evaluating its business,
financial performance and prospects. Therefore, you should not rely on
AutoChina’s past results or its historical rate of growth as an indication of
its future performance.
ACG requires
various approvals, licenses, authorizations, certificates, filings and permits
to operate its business and the loss of or failure to obtain or renew any or all
of these approvals, licenses, authorizations, certificates, filings and permits
could limit its ability to conduct its business
.
In
accordance with the laws and regulations of the PRC, ACG is required to maintain
various approvals, licenses, authorizations, certificates, filings and permits
in order to operate ACG’s business. ACG’s business could be affected by the
promulgation of new laws and regulations introducing new requirements (such as
new approvals, licenses, authorizations, certificates filings and/or permits).
In addition, companies incorporated in the PRC will be required to pass an
annual inspection conducted by the respective Administration of Industry and
Commerce in order to retain valid business approvals, license, authorizations,
certificates, filings and permits for their operations. As the PRC’s legislative
system evolves, it is also not uncommon for new laws and regulations to be
promulgated and put into effect on short notice. Failure to comply with these
laws and regulations, pass these inspections, or the loss of or failure to renew
its licenses, permits and certificates or any change in the government policies,
could lead to temporary or permanent suspension of some of ACG’s business
operations or the imposition of penalties on ACG, which could limit its ability
to conduct its business.
Failure by ACG’s
suppliers to introduce new models that are accepted by the market may cause it
to lose market share and fail to gain the anticipated economic benefits of such
new products
.
ACG’s
future success will be largely dependent on the ability of ACG’s motor vehicles
suppliers to launch new models to suit changing customers’ needs in China and to
continually enhance the performance and reliability of their existing automobile
models. If the vehicles manufactured by ACG’s suppliers do not receive the
anticipated market reception or customer preferences or the market for its
products change, ACG’s future development and market share in the industry, and
therefor its overall financial condition, may be materially and adversely
affected.
AutoChina’s
ability to pay dividends and utilize cash resources of its subsidiaries is
dependent upon the earnings of, and distributions by, AutoChina’s subsidiaries
and jointly-controlled enterprises
.
AutoChina
a holding company with substantially all of ACG’s business operations conducted
through its subsidiaries and jointly-controlled enterprises. AutoChina’s ability
to make dividend payments depends upon the receipt of dividends, distributions
or advances from its subsidiaries and jointly-controlled enterprises. The
ability of its subsidiaries and jointly-controlled enterprises to pay dividends
or other distributions may be subject to their earnings, financial position,
cash requirements and availability, applicable laws and regulations and to
restrictions on making payments to AutoChina or ACG contained in financing or
other agreements. These restrictions could reduce the amount of dividends or
other distributions that AutoChina receives from its subsidiaries and
jointly-controlled enterprises, which could restrict its ability to fund its
business operations and to pay dividends to its shareholders. AutoChina’s future
declaration of dividends may or may not reflect its historical declarations of
dividends and will be at the absolute discretion of the Board of
Directors.
Under
the EIT Law, AutoChina and ACG each may be classified as a “resident enterprise”
of the PRC. Such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to
AutoChina, ACG and AutoChina’s non-PRC shareholders.
Under the
EIT Law, an enterprise established outside of China with “de facto management
bodies” within China is considered a “resident enterprise,” meaning that it can
be treated in a manner similar to a Chinese enterprise for enterprise income tax
purposes, although the dividends paid to one resident enterprise from another
may qualify as “tax-exempt income.” The implementing rules of the EIT Law define
de facto management as “substantial and overall management and control over the
production and operations, personnel, accounting, and properties” of the
enterprise. The EIT Law and its implementing rules are relatively new and
ambiguous in terms of some definitions, requirements and detailed procedures,
and currently no official interpretation or application of this new “resident
enterprise” classification is available; therefore, it is unclear how tax
authorities will determine tax residency based on the facts of each
case.
If the
PRC tax authorities determine that either AutoChina or ACG is a “resident
enterprise” for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, a number of unfavorable PRC
tax consequences could follow. First, either AutoChina or ACG may be subject to
enterprise income tax at a rate of 25% on its worldwide taxable income, as well
as PRC enterprise income tax reporting obligations. Second, although under the
EIT Law and its implementing rules, dividends paid to AutoChina from ACG’s PRC
subsidiaries through ACG’s Hong Kong sub-holding company, assuming each such
company is a “resident enterprise,” should qualify as “tax-exempt income,”
AutoChina cannot guarantee that such dividends will not be subject to
withholding tax. Finally, the new “resident enterprise” classification could
result in a situation in which a 10% withholding tax is imposed on dividends
AutoChina pays to its non-PRC shareholders and with respect to gains derived by
AutoChina’s non-PRC shareholders from transferring AutoChina’s securities, if
such income is considered PRC-sourced income by the relevant PRC
authorities.
If any
such PRC taxes apply, a non-PRC shareholder may be entitled to a reduced rate of
PRC taxes under an applicable income tax treaty and/or a foreign tax credit
against such shareholder’s domestic income tax liability (subject to applicable
conditions and limitations). You should consult with your own tax advisors
regarding the applicability of any taxes, the effects of any applicable income
tax treaties, and any available foreign tax credits.
Yan Wang, the
wife of Yong Hui Li, the chairman and chief executive officer of ACG
and
a director and the chairman and chief executive officer of AutoChina, is the
beneficial owner of a substantial amount of AutoChina’s ordinary shares and Ms.
Wang may take actions with respect to such shares which are not consistent with
the interests of the other shareholders
.
Yan Wang,
the wife of Yong Hui Li, the chairman and chief executive officer of ACG and a
director and the chairman and chief executive officer of AutoChina, beneficially
owns approximately 80.31% of the outstanding ordinary shares of AutoChina as of
the date of this report, without taking into account AutoChina’s outstanding
warrants and assuming that there are no other changes to the number of ordinary
shares outstanding. Under SEC rules, Mr. Li can be deemed to beneficially own
such shares. Ms. Wang may take actions with respect to such shares without the
approval of other shareholders and which are not consistent with the interests
of the other shareholders, including the election of the directors and other
corporate actions of AutoChina such as:
|
·
|
its
merger with or into another
company;
|
|
·
|
a
sale of substantially all of its assets;
and
|
|
·
|
amendments
to its memorandum and articles of
incorporation.
|
The
decisions of Ms. Wang may conflict with AutoChina’s interests or the interests
of AutoChina’s other shareholders.
Prior to
AutoChina’s acquisition of ACG on April 9, 2009, AutoChina had not had
operations, and ACG had not operated as a public company. Fulfilling AutoChina’s
obligations incident to being a public company will be expensive and time
consuming
.
Prior to
AutoChina’s acquisition of ACG on April 9, 2009, AutoChina had not had
operations, and ACG had not operated as a public company. Each of AutoChina and
ACG have maintained relatively small finance and accounting staffs. Neither
AutoChina nor ACG currently has an internal audit group. Although AutoChina has
maintained disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over
financial reporting as required under the Federal securities laws with respect
to its very limited activities, it has not been required to maintain and
establish these disclosure controls and procedures and internal control as will
be required with respect to businesses such as ACG with substantial operations.
Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules and regulations of
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), AutoChina will need to
implement additional corporate governance practices and adhere to a variety of
reporting requirements and complex accounting rules. Compliance with these
obligations will require significant management time, place significant
additional demands on AutoChina’s and ACG’s finance and accounting staffs and on
their financial, accounting and information systems, and increase their
insurance, legal and financial compliance costs. AutoChina may also need to hire
additional accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company
experience and technical accounting knowledge.
AutoChina
may qualify as a passive foreign investment company, or “PFIC,” which could
result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S.
investors.
In
general, AutoChina will be classified as a PFIC for any taxable year in which
either (1) at least 75% of its gross income (looking through certain corporate
subsidiaries) is passive income or (2) at least 50% of the average value of its
assets (looking through certain corporate subsidiaries) is attributable to
assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income. Passive
income generally includes, without limitation, dividends, interest, rents,
royalties, and gains from the disposition of passive assets. If AutoChina is
determined to be a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder (as
defined in the section of this report captioned ‘‘Taxation–United States Federal
Income Taxation–General’’) held AutoChina’s ordinary shares, the U.S. Holder may
be subject to increased U.S. federal income tax liability and may be subject to
additional reporting requirements. Based on the composition of its assets and
the nature of its income in 2008, it is likely that AutoChina qualified as a
PFIC in 2008 (subject to the possible application of the start-up exception,
which depends on future facts and circumstances). AutoChina’s actual PFIC status
for any subsequent taxable year will not be determinable until after the end of
such taxable year. Accordingly there can be no assurance with respect
to its status as a PFIC for 2008 or any subsequent taxable year. We urge U.S.
investors to consult their own tax advisors regarding the possible application
of the PFIC rules. For a more detailed explanation of the tax consequences of
PFIC classification to U.S. Holders, see the section of this report
captioned ‘‘Taxation—United States Federal Income Taxation—Tax Consequences to
U.S. Holders of Ordinary Shares and Warrants of AutoChina—Passive Foreign
Investment Company Rules.’’
Risks
Relating to the Motor Vehicle Industry in China
Excess supply in
the PRC automobile market could reduce ACG’s profits and
growth
.
Automobile
sales in the PRC have been growing rapidly between 2001 and 2007, and this
growth has encouraged industry participants to enter the automobile retail
market through import or expansion of production capacities. This may have
resulted, and may continue to result, in an excess supply of automobiles in the
market, particularly in light of the recent economic slowdown in China and
around the world, which in turn can reduce ACG’s car and truck
sales.
Imposition of
fuel economy standards on PRC automotive manufacturers and the proposed
imposition of higher automobile consumption taxes may have a negative effect on
the revenues and profits of PRC automobile importers, dealers and distributors,
including ACG
.
The PRC
government adopted new automobile consumption taxes on April 1, 2006 which
increased the consumption tax rate on passenger cars with cylinder capacity of
more than 2.0 litres. In particular, the tax on passenger cars with a cylinder
capacity of more than 2.0 litres and up to 2.5 litres has been increased by 1%;
those with a cylinder capacity of more than 2.5 litres and up to 3.0 litres has
been increased by 4%; those with a cylinder capacity of more than 3.0 litres and
up to 4.0 litres has been increased by 7%; and those with a cylinder capacity of
more than 4.0 litres has been increased by 12%. AutoChina cannot assure you that
the automobile consumption tax rate will not be raised in the future, which
would increase the costs of vehicles with relatively large cylinder capacity.
Car importers, dealers and distributors in the PRC might not be able to
successfully pass on the tax increase as higher prices to customers. Even if
such increased costs are added to selling prices, such increase in prices could
result in a decline in vehicle sales. Such an increase in cost of good sold or
decline in demand may have an adverse effect on the revenues and profits of car
importers, dealers and distributors in the PRC, including ACG.
Automobile
importers, dealers and distributors in the PRC, including ACG, may expend
considerable resources in order to comply with the Regulations on Recall of
Defective Automotive Products, which took effect in October
2004
.
The PRC’s
Regulations on Recall of Defective Automotive Products came into effect on
October 1, 2004. This regulation requires automotive distributors to assist
automobile manufacturers to undertake service actions or recall campaigns. Any
such actions or campaigns may require automotive distributors to expend
considerable resources in detecting and reporting to the regulatory authorities
of any potential design defects, defective component parts or assembly defects
in the automobile-related products distributed, which could influence purchasing
decisions of potential purchasers of the vehicles distributed by ACG or
adversely affect the reputation of the products distributed by ACG, thereby
negatively affecting sales and profitability of ACG. Material failures by
automobile distributors to perform their obligations under such regulations may
also subject the distributors to certain penalties and fines.
The proposed
adoption of the “three guarantees” policy on vehicles sold in the PRC may have a
negative effect on the revenues and profits of ACG
.
The PRC
government is considering adopting the Regulations on Non-Commercial Passenger
Vehicle Repair, Exchange and Return Responsibilities (commonly referred to as
the “three guarantees” policy) in the near future. The new regulations are
designed to make it easier for buyers of vehicles which are to be used for
non-commercial purposes to hold the dealers primarily responsible for quality
defects in motor vehicles, regardless of the contractual allocation of such
liabilities between the manufacturers and dealers. These regulations provide,
among other things, that a purchaser can return a vehicle to the dealers at no
cost or, in some circumstances, at a nominal cost, if (i) a major quality
problem occurs within 30 days of the purchase or, (ii) such vehicle has the same
quality problem after five repair attempts or (iii) the aggregate time for all
quality-related repairs of such vehicle exceeds 35 days over a specified term
(usually two years).
If these
regulations are introduced as described above or in a similar form, the costs of
compliance with such regulations and the potential product defect liability, if
it occurs, could reduce ACG’s profitability. Even if ACG passes along such costs
to consumers in the form of higher selling prices, the increase in sales prices
could cause a decline in market demand and result in a material adverse effect
on the revenues and profits of ACG.
Any trade or
other political disputes between countries may affect ACG’s selection of motor
vehicles to be imported and sales turnover
.
Approximately
2.1% of the motor vehicles sold by ACG are imported from Japan, Europe and U.S.
There may be occasions when trade or other political disputes or tensions arise
between countries of imports and the countries of exports which are beyond ACG’s
control. Depending on the response of society to the government’s stance to such
disputes, the demand for the products imported from the countries which are
subject to the trade disputes may be affected, and hence affect ACG’s selection
of the product as well as the overall sales turnover. There is no assurance that
the customers would prefer one brand over the other or the vehicles made by one
country over the other country. In any of such events, this will cause a decline
in ACG’s sales turnover and affect ACG’s financial condition and results of
operations.
Fuel shortages
and fluctuations in fuel prices may adversely affect the demand for
automobiles
.
Fuel
prices are inherently volatile and have experienced significant rise from 2001
to 2008. Any surge in fuel prices will have an adverse effect on world economies
and, in particular, on the world’s automobile industries. For example, in 2007,
rising global oil prices and rising demand for fuel have led to fuel shortages
in China. This is due in part to increased automobile ownership as well as
government controls over fuel prices.
If the
PRC central government continues to control the price of domestic refined oil to
stabilize the market and demand for fuel in China continues to increase in line
with rising annual GDP, it is possible that further shortages will occur. If the
cost of fuel in the China continues to increase, consumers may elect to use
alternative means of transportation, and demand for automobiles, particularly
those with larger engine capacities, may decline.
ITEM
4.
|
INFORMATION
ON OUR COMPANY
|
A. History
and development of the Company
AutoChina
International Limited (f/k/a Spring Creek Acquisition Corp.) is a Cayman Islands
exempted company that was incorporated on October 16, 2007, and organized as a
blank check company for the purpose of acquiring, through a stock exchange,
asset acquisition or other similar business combination, or controlling, through
contractual arrangements, an operating business, that has its principal
operations in the People’s Republic of China, or PRC, as well as the Hong Kong
Special Administrative Region, the Macau Special Administrative Region and
Taiwan, which is also referred to as Greater China. AutoChina’s Amended and
Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association at the time provided that we
could not consummate a business combination with a business that had its
principal operations outside of Greater China.
On
February 27, 2008, we completed a private placement of 1,430,000 warrants to
James Cheng-Jee Sha, AutoChina’s former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman and
current director, Diana Chia-Huei Liu, AutoChina’s former President and current
director, William Tsu-Cheng Yu, AutoChina’s former Chief Financial Officer and
director, Jimmy (Jim) Yee-Ming Wu, AutoChina’s former Chief Operating Officer
and director and Gary Han Ming Chang, AutoChina’s former Special Advisor,
collectively referred to as the founding shareholders, as a result of which
AutoChina received net proceeds of $1,430,000.
The
Initial Public Offering
On March
4, 2008, AutoChina consummated its initial public offering of 4,500,000 units.
On March 13, 2008, the underwriters of AutoChina’s initial public offering
exercised their over-allotment option in full, for a total of an additional
675,000 units (over and above the 4,500,000 units sold in the initial public
offering) for an aggregate offering of 5,175,000 units. Each unit in the
offering consisted of one ordinary share and one redeemable ordinary share
purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase from AutoChina
one ordinary share in AutoChina at an exercise price of $5.00. AutoChina’s
ordinary shares and warrants started trading separately as of March 28,
2008.
In
connection with the initial public offering and the private placement,
AutoChina’s officers and directors placed all the shares owned by them before
the private placement and the initial public offering into an escrow account.
Except in certain circumstances, these shares will not be released from escrow
until January 9, 2010 (nine months after AutoChina’s consummation of a business
combination) with respect to 50% of the shares and April 9, 2010 (one year after
AutoChina’s consummation of a business combination) with respect to the
remaining 50% of the shares.
The
Acquisition
On April
9, 2009, pursuant to the terms of a share exchange agreement dated February 4,
2009 and amended March 11, 2009, we acquired all of the outstanding securities
of AutoChina Group Inc. (“ACG”). On that day, we filed Second Amended
and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association that, among other things,
changed our name to “AutoChina International Limited” and removed certain
provisions that, giving effect to AutoChina’s acquisition of ACG, were no longer
applicable.
Pursuant
to the share exchange agreement, upon AutoChina’s acquisition of ACG, AutoChina
issued 8,606,250 ordinary shares in AutoChina to Honest Best Int’l Ltd., ACG’s
prior shareholder, in upfront consideration, of which 10% was held back and
placed in escrow. The release of 50% of the holdback consideration is
conditioned on AutoChina’s exceeding $22.5 million EBITDA and 30% EBITDA Growth
(each as defined in the share exchange agreement) for the 2009 fiscal year, and
the remaining 50% of the holdback consideration will be released on the later of
20 days following delivery of the 2009 audited financial statements for
AutoChina and one year from the date of the closing of the transactions
contemplated in the share exchange agreement, in each case less any damages
claimed pursuant to the indemnification provisions of the share exchange
agreement at the time of such release. In addition, pursuant to an earn-out
provision in the share exchange agreement, AutoChina agreed to issue to Honest
Best Int’l Ltd., ACG’s prior shareholder, between 5% and 20% of the number of
ordinary shares outstanding as of December 31 of the fiscal year immediately
prior to such earn-out issuance for achieving a minimum EBITDA and certain
Targeted EBITDA Growth (each as defined in the Share Exchange Agreement) in each
of the next five years, through the year ended December 31, 2013.
In
connection with the acquisition, as of April 9, 2009, after the closing of the
acquisition, AutoChina closed on its previously announced agreements to purchase
3,053,910 ordinary shares for an aggregate of $24,217,506.30. Such
shares were voted in favor of the acquisition and other related
proposals.
Also in
connection with the acquisition, on April 7, 2009, AutoChina entered into
certain Put and Call Agreements with four of its shareholders. Pursuant to such
agreements, AutoChina agreed to be obligated to purchase (the “put option”) from
the shareholders, and the shareholders have agreed to be obligated to sell (the
“call option”) to AutoChina, an aggregate of 156,990 ordinary shares at an
exercise price of $9.05 per ordinary share, less the per share portion of any
cash dividend or other cash distribution paid to AutoChina’s shareholders prior
to the exercise of the put option or the call option. The put options are
exercisable during the two week period commencing on October 9, 2009. The call
options are exercisable until October 9, 2009, subject to certain limitations.
In connection with these agreements, AutoChina entered into an Escrow Agreement,
dated April 7, 2009, with the shareholders, Honest Best Int’l Ltd., the sole
shareholder of ACG prior to the acquisition, and Loeb & Loeb LLP, as the
escrow agent, pursuant to which the escrow agent will hold 7,745,625 ordinary
shares of AutoChina issued to Honest Best Int’l Ltd. in connection with
acquisition, together with $376,776 in cash provided by AutoChina, to secure
payment of the exercise price by AutoChina.
On April
7, 2009, AutoChina entered into certain Put and Call Agreements with four of its
shareholders. Pursuant to the agreements, AutoChina agreed to be obligated to
purchase (the “put option”) from the shareholders, and the shareholders have
agreed to be obligated to sell (the “call option”) to AutoChina, an aggregate of
299,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of $8.50 per share, less the per
share portion of any cash dividend or other cash distribution paid to
AutoChina’s shareholders prior to the exercise of the put option or the call
option. The put options are exercisable during the two week period commencing on
October 9, 2009. The call options are exercisable until October 9, 2009, subject
to certain limitations.
On April
8, 2009, AutoChina entered into a Put and Call Agreement with two of its
shareholders. Simultaneously with the execution of the agreement, the
shareholders purchased an aggregate of 548,800 ordinary shares of AutoChina at a
purchase price of $7.865 per ordinary share. Pursuant to the agreement,
AutoChina agreed to be obligated to purchase (the “put option”) from the
shareholders, and the shareholders have agreed to be obligated to sell (the
“call option”), an aggregate of 548,800 ordinary shares at an exercise price of
$8.40 per share, less the per share portion of any cash dividend or other cash
distribution paid to AutoChina’s shareholders prior to the exercise of the put
option or the call option. AutoChina also paid the shareholders an aggregate of
$57,624 in connection with the agreement. The put options are
exercisable during the two week period commencing on October 9, 2009. The call
options are exercisable until October 9, 2009, subject to certain
limitations. In connection with this agreement, AutoChina entered
into an Escrow Agreement, dated April 8, 2009 with the shareholders, ACG and
Loeb & Loeb LLP, as the escrow agent, pursuant to which the escrow agent
will hold $4,609,920 in cash provided by AutoChina to secure payment of the
exercise price by AutoChina.
AutoChina’s
principal place of business is located at No.322, Zhongshan East Road,
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, People’s Republic of China, and its telephone number is +86
311 8382 7688.
ACG
Corporate Development and History
ACG,
which was formerly known as KYF Inc., was a holding company incorporated in the
Cayman Islands on July 26, 2007 by Mr. Yong Hui Li with 50,000,000 ordinary
shares at $0.001 each. On the date of incorporation, 1,000 ordinary shares at
$0.001 each were issued, outstanding and fully paid by Mr. Yong Hui Li. Mr. Yong
Hui Li has subsequently transferred all of the issued, outstanding and fully
paid shares to his affiliates. On the date immediately prior to ACG’s
acquisition of ACG, the sole shareholder of ACG was Honest Best Int’l Ltd., a
company which is wholly owned by Ms. Yan Wang, Mr. Li’s wife.
ACG was
initially engaged solely in the automotive dealership business, which was
primarily located in Hebei Province of China. Prior to the incorporation of ACG
in 2007, ACG conducted business through its major variable interest entities,
Hua An Investment and Huiyin Investment since 2005. ACG (including its
subsidiaries and variable interest entities) is an integrated automotive
dealership company engaged in sales of automobiles, spare parts and after sales
services, consisting of 15 new automobile franchises in 25 auto dealerships,
which are located primarily in Hebei Province of the PRC. ACG offers an
extensive range of automotive products and services, including new automobiles,
auto maintenance, replacement parts, collision repair services, financing, and
insurance consulting and other aftermarket service contracts.
In April
2008, ACG commenced its full-service commercial vehicle sales and leasing
business pursuant to which it provides sales-type leasing services for customers
to acquire commercial vehicles in China. On August 8, 2008, ACG changed its name
from KYF Inc. to AutoChina Group Inc.
ACG’s
business is mainly operated by the Auto Kaiyuan Companies, which consists
primarily of four companies: Hua An Investment, Huiyin Investment, Kaiyuan
Logistics and Kaiyuan Auto Trade. Each is a limited liability corporation
established under the laws of the PRC.
On
November 26, 2008, through ACG’s wholly owned subsidiary, Hebei Chuanglian Trade
Co., Ltd., ACG executed a series of contractual arrangements with the Auto
Kaiyuan Companies and their shareholder (the “Enterprise Agreements”). Pursuant
to the Enterprise Agreements, ACG has exclusive rights to obtain the economic
benefits and assume the business risks of the Auto Kaiyuan Companies from their
shareholder, and generally has control of the Auto Kaiyuan Companies. The Auto
Kaiyuan Companies are considered variable interest entities, and ACG is the
primary beneficiary of those entities. ACG’s relationships with the Auto Kaiyuan
Companies and their shareholder are governed by the Enterprise Agreements
between Hebei Chuanglian Trade Co., Ltd. and each of the Auto Kaiyuan Companies,
which are the operating companies of ACG in the PRC.
As a
result, the Auto Kaiyuan Companies are deemed to be subsidiaries of ACG under
FASB Interpretation - FIN 46(R): Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (as
amended). Details of the Enterprise Agreements are as follows:
Assignment of Voting Rights
.
The shareholder of the Auto Kaiyuan Companies irrevocably agreed to assign all
of its voting rights to ACG for all business resolutions. As a result, ACG has
direct control of the Board of Directors and has authority to appoint the
majority of the Board of Directors which makes it the primary controlling
shareholder of the Auto Kaiyuan Companies.
Management and Operating
Agreement
. ACG was engaged to exclusively manage and operate the sales
and service of the 25 automotive dealerships held by the Auto Kaiyuan Companies,
including the development of sales and marketing strategy, management of
customer services, daily operations, financial management, employment issues and
all other related operating and consulting services. Furthermore, the Auto
Kaiyuan Companies agree that without the prior consent of ACG, the Auto Kaiyuan
Companies will not engage in any transactions that could materially affect their
respective assets, liabilities, rights or operations, including, without
limitation, incurrence or assumption of any indebtedness, sale or purchase of
any assets or rights, incurrence of any encumbrance on any of their assets or
intellectual property rights in favor of a third party or transfer of any
agreements relating to their business operation to any third party. The
management and operating agreement has a term of 10 years and will be extended
for another 10 years automatically unless ACG files a written notice at least 3
months prior to the expiration of this agreement.
Equity Interest Transfer
Agreement
. The shareholder of the Auto Kaiyuan Companies agreed to
transfer all of its assets to ACG and ACG has an exclusive, irrevocable and
unconditional right to purchase, or cause ACG’s designated party to purchase,
from such shareholder, at ACG’s sole discretion, part or all of the
shareholders’ equity interests in the Auto Kaiyuan Companies when and, to the
extent that, applicable PRC Laws permit ACG to own part or all of such equity
interests in the Auto Kaiyuan Companies. According to the Exclusive Equity
Interest Transfer Agreement, the purchase price to be paid by ACG to the
shareholder of the Auto Kaiyuan Companies will be the minimum amount of
consideration permitted by applicable PRC Law at the time when such share
transfer occurs.
Equity Pledge Agreement
.
Pursuant to the Equity Pledge Agreement, the Auto Kaiyuan Companies and their
shareholder agreed to pledge all of its equity interest and operating profits to
guarantee the performance of the Auto Kaiyuan Companies in the obligation under
the Equity Interest Transfer Agreement. In the event of the breach of any
conditions of the Equity Interest Transfer Agreement, ACG is entitled to enforce
its pledge rights over the equity interests of the Auto Kaiyuan Companies for
any losses suffered from the breach.
B. Business
Overview
Prior to
its acquisition of AutoChina Group Inc. (“ACG”), AutoChina had no operations.
ACG was incorporated in the Cayman Islands on July 26, 2007 and currently
consists of two primary reportable segments: the commercial vehicle sales and
leasing segment and the automotive dealership segment. ACG currently conducts
business through over 180 subsidiaries, all of which are majority or wholly
owned, directly or indirectly, by it. Its principal offices are located at 322
Zhongshan East Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050011, People’s Republic of
China, and its telephone number is +86 311 8382 7688.
ACG is a
full-service, integrated retailer of consumer automobiles and related services
and provider of commercial vehicle sales and leasing and related services under
the “Kaiyuan Auto” brand name. ACG’s automotive dealerships sell new and used
automobiles manufactured by Audi, Toyota, First Auto Works (“FAW”), Hyundai,
Buick, Ford, BMW, Chevrolet, ROEWE, Qingling, Cadillac, Peugeot, and Ruida Kia.
ACG also operates commercial vehicle financing centers. Through its
strategically located network of automotive dealerships and commercial vehicle
financing centers, ACG provides one-stop service for the needs of its customers,
including retail sales of new and used consumer automobiles, aftermarket parts
sales, service and repair facilities, commercial vehicle sales and leasing and
related administrative services.
ACG’s
automotive dealerships and commercial vehicle financing centers are principally
located in high traffic areas throughout Hebei, Shanxi, Shandong and Henan
provinces, the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and Beijing and Tianjin regions
of China. Since commencing operations in 2005, ACG has grown to operate 25
automotive dealerships and an insurance brokerage center. Commencing in March
2008 with its first commercial vehicle financing center operated by its
subsidiary, Gaocheng Kaiyuan Transportation Service Co., Ltd., ACG has quickly
grown its network of commercial vehicle financing centers to include 105 centers
as of May 15, 2009.
ACG’s
business strategy consists of providing its customers with competitively-priced
products supported with timely and reliable service through its integrated
automotive dealership and commercial vehicle financing center network. ACG
intends to continue to implement its business strategy, reinforce customer
loyalty and remain a market leader by continuing to develop its automotive
dealerships and commercial vehicle financing centers as its extends its
geographic presence through strategic acquisitions of new locations and
expansions of its existing facilities.
Automotive Dealerships
. ACG’s
automotive dealerships are located in the Hebei and Shanxi provinces and Tianjin
region of China. All of AutoChina’s retail automotive dealerships are “4S
dealerships,” which means that they sell new and used consumer automobiles,
repair and service consumer automobiles and sell spare parts. Each automotive
dealership is dedicated to and serves only one brand of automobile and is
certified by the relevant manufacturer. In addition, each automotive dealership
complies with strict technical specifications and facilities requirements,
procures vehicles and parts from the manufacturer, and receives training and
technical support from the manufacturer. This relationship between each
automotive dealership and manufacturer means manufacturers can ensure that
genuine spare parts are distributed to end-users directly (circumventing
unauthorized dealers and repair shops) and have better control over the
aftermarket for their products. Prior to receiving a franchise from an
automobile manufacturer, ACG has to satisfy certain qualification criteria from
the applicable automobile manufacturer, including having funding available and
agreeing to minimum purchase requirements. The franchises granted to ACG are
non-exclusive and the terms are ranged from one to three years and subject to
extension. Automobile manufacturers provide marketing assistance through
incentives and promotional materials. ACG has entered into committed facilities
line with several financial institutions affiliated with automobile
manufacturers to finance the new automobile inventories at market interest
rates.
In
connection with the sales of new automobiles, ACG may also act as insurance
agent and receive commissions from insurance institutions for the referral of
customers that buy auto insurance.
The
following chart reflects ACG’s franchise at each of its automotive dealership
locations:
|
|
|
Baoding
Tianhua Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
Hyundai
|
Cangzhou
Deyuan Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
Ford
|
Cangzhou
Hengyuan Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Hyundai
|
Cangzhou
Yichang Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Buick
|
Handan
Aohua Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Audi
|
Handan
Baohe Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
BMW
|
Handan
Defeng Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Peugeot
|
Handan
Yacheng Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Ruida
Kia
|
Hebei
Anchang Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
ROEWE
|
Hebei
Liantuo Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
Audi
|
Hebei
Meifeng Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Qingling
|
Hebei
Shengda Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
Ford
|
Hebei
Shengkang Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
Chevrolet
|
Hebei
Shengmei Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
FAW
|
Hebei
Shengwen Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
Hyundai
|
Hebei
Yitong Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Buick
|
|
|
|
Hebei
Yuanxinghang Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Cadillac
|
Hengshui
Dechang Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
Hyundai
|
Hengshui
Yuhua Toyota Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
FAW
Toyota
|
Qinhuangdao
Jianda Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Ford
|
Shijiazhuang
Baohe Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
BMW
|
Shijiazhuang
Xinhua Toyota Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
FAW
Toyota
|
Shijiazhuang
Yuhua Toyota Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
FAW
Toyota
|
Tangshan
Yachang Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Ruida
Kia
|
Zhangjiakou
Meihua Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
Hyundai
|
Hebei
Tianmei Insurance Agents Co., Ltd.
|
|
Insurance
Services
|
Commercial Vehicle Financing
Centers
. ACG’s commercial vehicle financing centers are located
throughout Hebei, Shanxi, Shandong and Henan provinces, the Inner Mongolia
Autonomous Region and Beijing and Tianjin regions of China. At each commercial
vehicle financing center, ACG provides financing to assist customers in
purchasing new commercial vehicles. ACG employs a “three full/one quick” service
concept at all its commercial vehicle financing centers, which refers to its
customers’ ability to purchase a commercial vehicle through its full-service
commercial vehicle sales and leasing services, administrative services and
365-day vehicle services in a single convenient transaction. Customers wishing
to purchase a commercial vehicle can go to any ACG commercial vehicle financing
center and select a commercial vehicle from the catalogues and informational
literature provided by ACG. The customer then arranges for financing and related
services with ACG, which involves a credit check and a down payment of 20-30% of
the purchase price. The commercial vehicles are then purchased by ACG from local
third-party dealers and provided to ACG’s customers. During the term of the
financing, which is typically two years, ACG retains title to the commercial
vehicle and in addition provides administrative services for the customers,
including all registration and license processing, payment of surcharges, toll
pass, transportation fees, licenses and insurance, and monthly renewal of the
government-mandated commercial vehicle permits to the customer. Following the
end of the financing period, ACG transfers title to the vehicle to the customer
and provides the customer the option to continue to use ACG to manage the
administrative and vehicle services for a fee. Additionally, ACG sells, as
agent, a complete line of property and casualty insurance, including collision
and liability insurance on the commercial vehicles.
The
following chart indicates the number of ACG commercial vehicle financing centers
in each of the provinces/regions where ACG conducts its business as of May 15,
2007
Chinese
Province / Region
|
|
Number
of Commercial Vehicle
Financing
Centers
|
|
Hebei:
|
|
12
|
|
Shanxi:
|
|
29
|
|
Tianjin:
|
|
1
|
|
Beijing:
|
|
1
|
|
Shandong:
|
|
24
|
|
Henan:
|
|
21
|
|
Inner
Mongolia Autonomous Region:
|
|
17
|
|
Total:
|
|
105
|
|
ACG
leased most of the properties where the dealership stores and commercial vehicle
financing centers are located. ACG expects to continue to lease the majority of
the properties where ACG’s stores or centers are located.
ACG
expects to use cash to purchase property, equipment and improvement in the next
12 months in connection with adding 45 commercial vehicle financing centers. ACG
intends to use cash on hand to finance these purchases. See “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—ACG’s
Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources”
for further information.
Business
Strategy
Operating Strategy
. ACG’s
strategy is to operate an integrated automotive dealership network that
primarily markets middle-to high-end consumer automobiles from various
manufacturers and an integrated commercial vehicle financing center network that
provides commercial vehicle sales and leasing business and in each case also
provide consumer automobile customers and commercial vehicle sales and leasing
customers with complementary products and services. ACG’s strategy includes the
following key elements:
|
·
|
One-Stop
Centers
. ACG has developed its automotive dealerships and
commercial vehicle financing centers as “one-stop centers” where, at one
convenient location, its customers can do the following: purchase new and
used automobile or new commercial vehicles; finance their purchases;
purchase aftermarket parts and accessories; and have service performed by
certified technicians. ACG believes that this full-service strategy also
helps to mitigate cyclical economic fluctuations because parts and service
sales at its automotive dealerships generally tend to be less volatile
than its new and used consumer automobile sales and new commercial vehicle
sales and leasing businesses.
|
|
·
|
Branding
Program
. ACG employs a branding program for its automotive
dealerships and commercial vehicle financing centers through distinctive
signage and uniform marketing programs to take advantage of its existing
name recognition and to communicate the high quality of its products and
reliability of its services throughout its automotive dealership and
commercial vehicle financing center
networks.
|
|
·
|
Centralized Management
Systems
. In order to efficiently operate each of the business units
within each automotive dealership, ACG relies upon its centralized
management systems to determine and monitor appropriate inventory levels
and product mix at each automotive dealership. All sales, and financing
materials utilized by the commercial vehicle financing centers are
prepared by ACG’s corporate office, which increases efficiency and
uniformity among ACG’s commercial vehicle financing centers. In addition,
by actively monitoring market conditions, assessing product and expansion
strategies and remaining abreast of changes within the market, ACG is able
to proactively address changes in customer needs or in the offerings of
competitors and adjust its services by, for example, adding product lines
and models.
|
Growth Strategy
. ACG’s
expansion and acquisition initiatives have enabled it to grow a large,
full-service network of automotive dealerships and commercial vehicle financing
centers. ACG intends to continue to grow its business internally and through
acquisitions by expanding into new geographic areas, expanding its product
offerings and opening new one-stop commercial vehicle financing centers in
existing markets.
|
·
|
Expansion Into New
Geographic Areas
. ACG plans to continue to expand its commercial
vehicle financing center network by developing additional centers in
geographic areas contiguous to its current operations. ACG has
successfully expanded its network of commercial vehicle financing centers
from its first center in March 2008 into a multi-province network of 105
commercial vehicle financing centers. ACG believes the geographic
diversity of this network has significantly expanded its customer base
while reducing the effects of local economic
cycles.
|
|
·
|
Expansion of Product
Offerings
. ACG intends to continue to expand its product lines
within its automotive dealership and commercial vehicle financing centers
by adding product categories that are both complementary to its existing
product lines and well suited to its operating model. ACG believes that
there are many additional product and service offerings that would
complement its primary product lines, such as emergency vehicle support
services. In addition, ACG’s commercial vehicle financing centers entered
into a sales agreement with a third-party contractor for multiple
commercial construction vehicles and equipment for approximately RMB 11
million in December 2008. ACG expects any other product category expansion
that it pursues to satisfy its requirements
that:
|
|
o
|
the
products serve an existing and expanding customer
base;
|
|
o
|
the
products provide opportunities for incremental income through related
aftermarket sales, service or financing;
and
|
|
o
|
ACG
operating controls can be implemented to enhance the financial performance
of the business.
|
|
·
|
Open New Commercial
Vehicle Financing Centers in Existing Areas of Operation
. ACG
believes that there are opportunities to increase its share of the
commercial vehicle sales and leasing market by introducing its one-stop
centers to underserved markets within its current areas of operation. The
introduction of additional one-stop centers enables ACG to enhance
revenues from its existing customer base as well as increase the awareness
of the “Kaiyuan Auto” brand name for new
customers.
|
In
identifying new areas for expansion, ACG analyzes the target market’s level of
new commercial vehicle registrations, customer buying trends and the existence
of competing franchises. ACG also assesses the potential performance of a parts
and service center to determine whether a market is suitable for an automotive
dealership or commercial vehicle financing center. After a market has been
strategically reviewed, ACG surveys the region for a well-situated location.
Whether ACG acquires existing automotive dealerships or opens a new automotive
dealership or commercial vehicle financing center, it will introduce its
branding program and implement its integrated management system.
Management
of Automotive Dealerships
ACG’s
automotive dealerships are responsible for sales of new and used consumer
automobiles, as well as related parts and services.
ACG
manages its automotive dealerships as described below.
New Vehicle Sales
. In 2008,
ACG sold 17,313 new vehicles representing 12 brands in retail transactions at
its automotive dealerships. ACG retail sales of new vehicles accounted for
approximately 57.4% of its gross profit in 2008. In addition to the initial sale
of the vehicle, a typical new vehicle sale creates the following additional
profit opportunities for an automotive dealership:
|
·
|
manufacturer
incentives, if any;
|
|
·
|
the
resale of any trade-in purchased by the automotive
dealership;
|
|
·
|
the
sale of insurance contracts in connection with the retail sale;
and
|
|
·
|
the
service and repair of the vehicle both during and after the warranty
period.
|
Brand
diversity is one of ACG’s strengths. The following table sets forth new vehicle
sales revenue by brand and the number of new vehicle retail units sold in the
year ended, and the number of franchises ACG owned as of December 31,
2008:
|
|
New
Vehicle
Revenues
FY2008
|
|
|
New
Vehicle
Unit
Sales
FY
2008
|
|
|
Franchises
Owned
as
of
December
31,
2008
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audi
|
|
$
|
106,365
|
|
|
|
1,626
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
BMW
|
|
|
28,552
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Buick
|
|
|
34,813
|
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Cadillac
|
|
|
3,678
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Chevrolet
|
|
|
13,234
|
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
FAW/Toyota
(1)
|
|
|
61,716
|
|
|
|
3,380
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Ford
|
|
|
32,682
|
|
|
|
1,882
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Hyundai
|
|
|
69,593
|
|
|
|
5,729
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Peugeot
|
|
|
1,792
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Qingling
|
|
|
6,285
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Ruida
Kia(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
ROEWE
|
|
|
7,206
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
$
|
365,916
|
|
|
|
17,313
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
(1)
Toyota automotive dealerships are operated out of three of ACG’s FAW automotive
dealerships pursuant to a joint venture agreement between FAW and
Toyota.
(2) Under
construction in 2008.
ACG’s mix
of domestic and import sales for the year ended December 31, 2008 (unaudited) is
set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
Total Units Sold
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Import
|
|
$
|
29,129
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
Domestic
|
|
|
336,787
|
|
|
|
16,968
|
|
|
|
97.9
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
365,916
|
|
|
|
17,313
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Used Vehicle Sales
. ACG sells
used vehicles at each of its franchised automotive dealerships. In 2008, ACG
sold 66 used vehicles at its automotive dealerships representing approximately
0.1% of its gross profit in 2008. Used vehicles sold at retail typically
generate higher gross margins on a percentage basis than new vehicles because
ACG can acquire these vehicles at favorable prices due to the nature of their
valuation, which is dependent on a vehicle’s age, mileage and condition, among
other things. Valuations also vary based on supply and demand factors, the level
of new vehicle incentives, the availability of retail financing, and general
economic conditions.
Profit
from the sale of used vehicles depends primarily on an automotive dealership’s
ability to obtain a high-quality supply of used vehicles at reasonable prices
and to effectively manage that inventory. ACG’s new vehicle operations provide
its used vehicle operations with a supply of generally high-quality trade-ins
and off-lease vehicles, the best sources of high-quality used vehicles. The
sales of the used vehicles is small in comparison with ACG’s overall sales of
consumer automobiles because ACG has many first time buyers and the second hand
automobile trade-in market in China was not fully developed.
Parts and Service Sales
. ACG
sells replacement parts and provides maintenance and repair services at each of
its franchised automotive dealerships. ACG’s parts and service business
accounted for approximately 31.8% of its gross profit in 2008. ACG performs both
warranty and non-warranty service work at its automotive dealerships, primarily
for the vehicle models sold at a particular automotive dealership. Warranty work
accounted for approximately 35.9% of the revenues from its parts and service
business in 2008. ACG’s parts and service departments also perform used vehicle
reconditioning and new vehicle preparation services for which they realize a
profit when such vehicle is sold to a retail customer.
A
majority of automobile maintenance and repair is performed by dealerships in
China. ACG has made investments in obtaining, training and retaining qualified
technicians to work in its service and repair facilities and in state-of-the art
diagnostic and repair equipment utilized by these technicians. Additionally,
manufacturers permit warranty work to be performed only at franchised automotive
dealerships, and there is a trend in the consumer automobile industry towards
longer new vehicle warranty periods. As a result, ACG believes that a majority
of all maintenance and repair work will continue to be performed at franchised
automotive dealerships that have the sophisticated equipment and skilled
personnel necessary to perform repairs and warranty work on increasingly complex
vehicles.
ACG’s
strategy to capture an increasing share of the parts and service work performed
by franchised automotive dealerships includes the following
elements:
|
·
|
Focus on Customer
Relationships; Emphasize Preventative Maintenance
. ACG’s automotive
dealerships seek to convert new and used vehicle customers into customers
of its parts and service departments. To accomplish this goal, ACG uses
computer systems that track customers’ maintenance records and provide
advance notice to owners of vehicles purchased or serviced at its
automotive dealerships when their vehicles are due for periodic service.
ACG’s use of computer-based customer relationship management tools
increases the reach and effectiveness of its marketing efforts, allowing
ACG to target its promotional offerings to areas in which service capacity
is underutilized or profit margins are greatest. ACG continues to train
its service personnel to establish relationships with their service
customers to promote a long-term business relationship. ACG believes its
parts and service activities are an integral part of the customer service
experience, allowing it to create ongoing relationships with its
automotive dealerships’ customers thereby deepening customer loyalty to
the automotive dealership as a
whole.
|
|
·
|
Efficient Management
of Parts Inventory
. ACG’s automotive dealerships’ parts departments
support their sales and service departments through selling
factory-approved parts for the vehicle makes and models sold by a
particular automotive dealership. Such parts are either used in repairs
made in the service department, sold at retail to customers, or sold at
wholesale to independent repair shops and other franchised automotive
dealerships. ACG’s automotive dealerships employ parts managers who
oversee parts inventories and sales and its automotive dealerships also
frequently share parts with each other. ACG uses centralized software
programs to monitor parts inventory to avoid obsolete and unused parts to
maximize sales as well as to take advantage of manufacturer return
procedures.
|
Management
of Commercial Vehicle Financing Centers
ACG’s
commercial vehicle financing centers are responsible for financing of sales of
new commercial vehicles, as well as related services. Most of the customers of
ACG’s commercial vehicle sales and leasing business are independent contractors,
who finance one commercial vehicle to engage transportation and logistic
business in the PRC. In December 2008, ACG’s commercial vehicle financing
centers entered into a sales agreement with a third-party contractor for
multiple commercial construction vehicles and equipment for approximately RMB 11
million.
ACG
manages its commercial vehicle financing centers as described
below.
Finance and Sales
. Revenues
from ACG’s financing operations consist primarily of fees for the arranging
financing and purchase of commercial vehicles, administrative services, vehicle
service, and acting as an agent for insurance companies in connection with the
purchase of new commercial vehicles. ACG’s commercial vehicle finance business
accounted for approximately 8.0% of its gross revenues in 2008. Through its
one-stop commercial vehicle financing centers ACG offers vehicle purchase
financings, administrative services and vehicle services in a convenient manner
and at competitive prices. To increase transparency to its customers, ACG offers
all of its products on menus that display pricing and other information,
allowing customers to choose the products that suit their needs.
Once a
customer has selected a model to purchase and has qualified for financing, ACG
purchases the commercial vehicle from a third-party vendor with which it has a
pre-existing relationship. Beiguo, a PRC-based operator of grocery stores,
purchases vehicles from time to time from third-party vendors pursuant to ACG’s
requirements. ACG purchases the vehicles from third-party vendors at wholesale.
ACG has entered into short-term financing arrangements with a PRC commercial
bank and Beiguo so that ACG will be able to pay commercial vehicle vendors or
Beiguo. With respect to Beiguo, the purchase price for the commercial vehicles
is required to be paid within six months after the execution of the purchase
contract at a 2% premium. Such short-term financing usually requires a guarantee
undertaken by Yong Hui Li in favor of ACG for the benefit of the PRC commercial
bank. In addition, Yong Hui Li and Kaiyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd., for which Yong
Hui Li serves as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, have provided
guarantees to Beiguo with respect to ACG’s obligation to pay for commercial
vehicles purchased from Beiguo. These financing arrangements help ACG expand its
commercial vehicle sales and leasing business while minimizing its upfront cash
expenditures. Yong Hui Li involved Beiguo in this purchase and sale of
commercial vehicles because Beiguo is able to obtain cost-effective financing
from PRC commercial banks to acquire commercial vehicles on behalf of ACG. ACG
intends to increase its volume of purchases of commercial vehicles directly from
third-party vendors, though there can be no assurance that it will continue to
have sufficient assets or financing from third-parties to acquire adequate
supplies of vehicles to meet its customers’ demands or expand its
business.
Upon
receipt of the commercial vehicle, ACG then makes the vehicle available for use
to the customer in exchange for 24 monthly payments (each year ACG allows
customers to defer payments during Chinese New Year celebrations so the term
typically lasts a total of 26 months). At the end of the term of the financing,
the vehicle is paid for, and ACG transfers the title of the vehicle to the
customer. Additionally, ACG sells, as agent, a complete line of property and
casualty insurance, including collision and liability insurance on the
commercial vehicles.
Administrative and Vehicle
Services
. At the time a commercial vehicle is purchased and financed
through an ACG commercial vehicle financing center, ACG handles all registration
and license processing, payment of surcharges, toll pass, transportation fees,
licenses and insurance, for which it charges the customer service fees. In
addition, during the term of the financing arrangements ACG also charges its
customers for administrative services and vehicle services, including the
monthly permit renewals required by the Chinese government for each commercial
vehicle and providing 365-day vehicle maintenance and roadside assistance
services. ACG believes that the requirement that permits for commercial vehicles
be renewed on a monthly basis (which is controlled by ACG during the term of the
financing), the substantial initial down payments (typically 20-30%) it
requires, retaining title to a vehicle during the term of the lease, and the
traditionally low level of auto loan default rates in China results in a
relatively low risk of default by customers in this segment.
As part
of its 365-day vehicle maintenance and roadside assistance services, ACG
customers can stop in or call the nearest commercial vehicle financing center in
the event they need emergency or maintenance repair services. ACG believes this
service will increase in value to its customers as it continues to expand its
network of commercial vehicle financing centers. Following the end of the
financing term, ACG continues to offer its administrative and vehicle services
to its customers which it believes will provide steady revenue streams in the
future. ACG only provides these administrative and vehicle services to those
customers who purchase and finance vehicles though it, which ACG believes will
serve as an incentive for customers to purchase and finance vehicles though ACG
and thus increase customer loyalty.
In order
to take advantage of certain tax laws in China, AutoChina is considering
entering into certain arrangements pursuant to which a third party trustee will
hold cash to purchase vehicles and have legal title to the vehicles leased to
customers in AutoChina’s commercial vehicle leasing
business. Although these arrangements may result in tax savings to
AutoChina, because the vehicles will not be owned by AutoChina, it will be
relying on a third party trustee (which AutoChina will not control) to act in
accordance with various agreements between it and
AutoChina. Therefore, if AutoChina enters into such arrangements and
the third party trustee does not act in accordance with the terms of the
applicable agreements, AutoChina may (a) incur significant legal expenses in
enforcing the arrangements or in having the vehicles returned to it or (b)
suffer significant losses if funds are misappropriated.
Sales
and Marketing
ACG’s
expansion and acquisition strategy and history of operations in the consumer
automobile business have resulted in a strong customer base. ACG generally
promotes its products and related services through direct customer contact by
its sales personnel, advertisements in trade magazines and attendance at
industry shows. ACG hires approximately 20 to 40 sales and marketing staff in
automotive dealerships. The salaries of most of such employees are based on
commission.
ACG
believes that its reliable service to its customers, its history and its
geographic diversity have resulted in increased market recognition of the
Kaiyuan Auto brand name and have served to reinforce customer loyalty. In an
effort to enhance ACG’s name recognition and to communicate the high level of
quality products and services provided at its automotive dealerships and
commercial vehicle financing centers, ACG will continue to implement its Kaiyuan
Auto brand name concept at each of its automotive dealerships and commercial
vehicle financing centers. Each of ACG’s automotive dealerships or commercial
vehicle financing centers is identified as a Kaiyuan Auto location.
Facility
Management
Personnel
. Each automotive
dealership and commercial vehicle financing center is typically managed by a
general manager who oversees the operations, personnel and the financial
performance of the location, subject to the direction of ACG’s corporate office.
Additionally, each automotive dealership is typically staffed by a sales
manager, parts manager, service manager, sales representatives, parts employees,
and other service employees, as appropriate, and given the services offered. The
sales staff of each commercial vehicle financing center consists of sales
representatives and other service employees.
On an
annual basis, general managers prepare detailed monthly profit and loss
forecasts by end of prior fiscal year based upon historical information and
projected trends. A portion of each general manager’s performance bonus is based
upon whether they meet or exceed their operating plans. During the year, general
managers regularly review their facility’s progress with senior management and
revise bonuses as needed. Most of ACG’s employees receive annual performance
evaluations.
Members
of senior management regularly travel to each location to provide on-site
management and support. Each location is audited regularly for compliance with
corporate policies and procedures. These routine unannounced internal audits
objectively measure automotive dealership and commercial vehicle financing
center performance with respect to corporate expectations.
Purchasing and Suppliers
. ACG
believes that pricing is an important element of its marketing strategy. Because
of its size, ACG automotive dealerships and commercial vehicle financing centers
benefit from volume purchases at favorable prices that enable them to achieve a
competitive pricing position in the industry. ACG automotive dealerships
purchase their consumer vehicle inventory and parts and accessories directly
from the manufacturers. Commercial vehicle purchases financed through a
commercial vehicle financing center are purchased through wholesale vendors and
retail vendors located nears each commercial vehicle financing center. All
purchasing commitments are negotiated by personnel at ACG’s corporate
headquarters. ACG believes that it has been able to negotiate favorable pricing
levels and terms, which enables it to offer competitive prices for its
products.
Capital
Expenditures
ACG’s
capital expenditures include expenditures to extend the useful life of current
facilities and expenditures to start or expand operations. In general,
expenditures relating to the construction or expansion of dealership facilities
are driven by new franchises being granted to ACG by a manufacturer, significant
growth in sales at an existing facility, dealership acquisition activity, or
manufacturer marketing campaigns. The estimated cost of establishing a new
dealership is approximately RMB10 million. Expenditures relating to the
establishment of a new commercial vehicle financing center include leasing of
commercial retail space, branding and other fixtures and machinery and
equipment. The estimated cost of establishing a commercial vehicle financing
center is approximately RMB225,000.
ACG plans
to invest approximately RMB10.6 million in 2009 to establish approximately 47
new commercial vehicle financing centers, and approximately RMB13.5 million in
2010 to establish approximately 60 new commercial vehicle financing centers,
with the goal of operating a total of 210 commercial vehicle financing centers
by the end of 2010. These expansion efforts will generally be funded from excess
cash and additional financing.
Competition
General
The
markets for ACG’s services are highly competitive. The most important factors
affecting competition for ACG’s business include the following:
|
·
|
professional
and quality of services;
|
|
·
|
attractiveness
and breadth of portfolio of products and services
offered;
|
|
·
|
quality
of customer services support; and
|
|
·
|
ability
to timely source new products and/or provide customized services to meet
customers needs.
|
Automotive
Dealership Business
ACG is
not the exclusive franchise automotive dealers for the brands it sells and it is
not the only multi-brands motor group in Hebei and Shanxi provinces of China.
Based on the management’s industry knowledge, ACG faces competition from other
dealers distributing the same brand as well as other brands within the
authorized territory since there are usually multiple dealers for each brand
within in each authorized territory. Nonetheless, the barriers to entry into the
motor vehicle industry are quite high as a dealership agreement must have been
first granted by the automobile manufacturer prior to commencement of sale of
such automobiles.
For ACG’s
parts and repairing services, levels of competition and the barriers to entry
vary from one segment to another. Based on the management’s industry knowledge,
ACG faces high competition for the parts and repairing services in China where
there are many substitutable products by various brands for the same type of
products available on the market. Even though the barriers to entry are high as
the trading of genuine parts must be authorized by the automobile manufacturer
under a dealership agreement, ACG faces competition from other automotive
dealers and distributors located in Hebei and Shanxi provinces of
China.
Commercial
Vehicle Sales and Leasing Business
ACG’s
commercial vehicle sales and leasing business in northern regions of China faces
relatively low competition as there are not many large-scale operators in the
area and the barriers to entry are relatively high as such business requires
significant working capital to set up the business network.
Trademarks
and Intellectual Property
Kaiyuan
Auto is a trademark, service mark and trade name of ACG. ACG does not have any
other trademarks, service marks and trade names.
The Audi,
Toyota, FAW, Hyundai, Buick, Ford, BMW, Chevrolet, ROEWE, Qingling, Cadillac,
Peugeot and Ruida Kia trademarks and trade names, which are used in connection
with ACG’s marketing and sales efforts, are subject to limited licenses included
in its dealership agreements with each manufacturer. The licenses are for the
same periods as its dealership agreements. These trademarks and trade names are
recognized internationally and are important in the marketing of its products.
Each licensor engages in a continuous program of trademark and trade name
protection.
Employees
On
December 31, 2008, ACG had 1,565 employees, of which 238 employees were members
of management (including managers at each facility). ACG has no contracts or
collective bargaining agreements with labor unions and has never experienced
work stoppages. ACG considers its relations with its employees to be
good.
Seasonality
ACG’s
second and third fiscal quarters (April through September) have historically
been slower for dealership sales. Conversely, ACG’s first and fourth fiscal
quarters (January through March and October through December) have historically
been the busiest times for car sales. Therefore, ACG generally realizes a higher
proportion of its revenue and operating profit during the first and fourth
fiscal quarters. ACG expects this trend to continue in future periods. If
conditions arise that impair vehicle sales during the first or fourth fiscal
quarters, the adverse effect on ACG’s revenues and operating profit for the year
could be disproportionately large.
Governmental
Regulations
Automotive
and Other Laws and Regulations
ACG
operates in a regulated industry in China. Numerous laws and regulations affect
ACG’s businesses. In each province, territory and/or locality which ACG does
business, it must obtain various approvals, licenses, authorizations,
certificates, filings and permits in order to operate its vehicle sales,
commercial truck financing and service and maintenance businesses, including 4S
qualification, road transportation operation permits and insurance agency
permits. Numerous laws and regulations govern ACG’s conduct of its businesses,
including those relating to its sales, operations, financing, advertising and
insurance practices. These laws and regulations include, among others, consumer
protection laws, laws and regulations pertaining to new and used motor vehicle
dealers, laws and regulations pertaining to vehicle repair and road
transportation, as well as a variety of other laws and regulations. These laws
also include employment practices laws.
ACG’s
dealership and service and maintenance operations are subject to the National
Transportation Laws or other relevant rules and regulations. Pursuant to the
National Transportation Laws, a road transportation operation permit is required
for the operation of transportation and auto repair businesses. ACG’s dealership
and service and maintenance operations are also subject to relevant rules and
regulations, including Provisions on the Administration of Motor Vehicle
Maintenance, or Maintenance Provisions, and the Regulations on Recall of
Defective Automotive Products. See “Risk Factors Risks Relating to the Motor
Vehicle Industry in China – Automobile importers, dealers and distributors in
the PRC, including ACG, may expend considerable resources in order to comply
with the Regulations on Recall of Defective Automotive Products, which took
effect in October 2004.” The Maintenance Provisions define the three grades of
licenses for motor vehicle repair personnel (i.e. Grade I licensees can conduct
major repair, unit repair, small repair, maintenance aids, special repair and
the examination work after the completion of maintenance of corresponding
vehicle types, Grade II can undertakes major repair, unit repair, small repair,
maintenance aids, special repair and the examination work after the completion
of maintenance of corresponding vehicle types, etc.) and sets forth the
requirements for establishing vehicle repair establishments (such as personnel
qualification, equipment requirements and having passed relevant
inspection).
ACG’s
used vehicle sales operations are subject to the Measures for Administration of
the Circulation of Second-Hand Automobiles, or Second- Hand Car Measures and the
Specifications for Second-hand Automobile Trade, or Second-Hand Specifications.
The Second-Hand Car Measures provides a definition of second-hand automobiles
(i.e. automobiles that are traded and whose ownership is transferred in the
duration from the completion of the registration formalities to when the state
compulsory vehicle discarding standards are satisfied, including three-wheeled
automobiles, low-speed motor trucks (i.e. former agricultural transport
vehicles), trailers and motorcycles) and sets forth the procedures and
requirements for establishing a used automobile market operator, including
specific requirements for business scope, license, filings with the provincial
commerce authority. The Second-hand Car Measures also define the various types
of second-hand automobile activities (i.e. retail sale of second-hand
automobiles, auction of second-hand automobiles, brokerage of second-hand
automobiles, authentication and evaluation of second-hand automobiles and direct
transaction of second-hand automobiles) and sets forth separate and/or
additional regulations governing such activities. The Second-Hand Specifications
sets forth additional detailed implementing rules and requirements for the above
activities, including documentation required for sale and purchase transactions,
restrictions on certain unethical broker practices and auction procedures. In
addition to the damages and penalties noted below, violators of the Second-Hand
Measures shall also be published in a public list circulated by the
administrative department for industry and commerce of the PRC State Council.
Additionally, the Peoples Republic of China National Road Traffic Safety Laws,
or Road Safety Laws imposes fines on sellers (including second-hand dealers) of
automobiles that have been determined to require disposal.
ACG’s new
vehicle 4S sales operations are subject to the Implementing Measures for the
Administration of Automobile Brand Sales, or Brand Sales Measures. Pursuant to
the Brand Sales Measures, the establishment of each new 4S store must follow
certain registration procedures for establishing a dealership company for the
sale of cars of a particular brand, including the following:
|
·
|
Obtaining
written authorization from the auto supplier (manufacturer or general
dealer);
|
|
·
|
Registering
the company with the State Administration of Industry and Commerce, or
SAIC, as a 4S store by submitting various documents and information,
including the company’s business license, written authorization from the
auto supplier, a description of after-sale service methods (i.e. the
service station, return and refund policy, replacement policy, and repair
and maintenance services, etc.), a Brand Car Dealer Registration Form and
other information;
|
|
·
|
Presenting
the evidence of registration with SAIC to the local branch of SAIC to
expand its business scope to include a given brand car sales;
and
|
|
·
|
Registering
with the local bureau of commerce (local branch of MOFCOM) within two
months from obtaining the business license that includes a given brand car
sales and providing various
documentation.
|
The Road
Safety Laws prohibit the sales of new automobiles that have determined to be
subject to disposal (i.e. rejected cars). ACG’s new vehicle sales operations may
also be subject to new regulations under consideration for adoption by the PRC
Government. In addition, expansion of a 4S store to a second brand may also be
subject to applicable rules and regulations.
Claims
arising out of actual or alleged violations of the regulations and laws noted
above may be asserted against ACG by individuals or government entities and may
expose it to significant damages or other penalties, including revocation or
suspension of ACG’s licenses, certificates, and/or permits to conduct commercial
truck financing operations and fines.
Environmental,
Health and Safety Laws and Regulations
ACG’s
operations involve the use, handling, storage and contracting for recycling
and/or disposal of materials such as motor oil and filters, transmission fluids,
antifreeze, refrigerants, paints, thinners, batteries, cleaning products,
lubricants, degreasing agents, tires and fuel. Consequently, ACG’s business is
subject to a variety of PRC laws and regulations governing management and
disposal of materials and wastes, protection of the environment and public
health and safety. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result
in the assessment of penalties and imposition of remedial obligations. ACG may
not be able to recover some or any of these costs from insurance.
ACG may
be subject to water quality protection programs under the Regulations for on
Collecting and Using Pollution Discharge, or Pollution Discharge Regulations.
Pursuant to the Pollution Discharge Regulations, in the event that a PRC company
fails to pay the pollutant discharge fees in accordance with law, it shall be
ordered to pay such fees within a prescribed time limit by the administrative
department for environmental protection of the peoples governments of the county
level and above within their power and function or else a fine no less than one
time but no more than three times of such payable pollutant discharge fees shall
be imposed, and such PRC company shall be ordered to stop its business for
rectification. Additionally, ACG is subject to the Measures of Hebei Province
for Administration of Pollutant Discharge Permits (for Trial Implementation), or
the Hebei Measures, pursuant to which each and every entity that may discharge
pollutants in Hebei province shall apply to the competent environmental
protection administration authority for a permit for the discharge of
pollutants, or pollutant discharge permit in accordance with the Hebei Measures,
and shall not discharge pollutants before obtaining a pollutant discharge
permit. Under the Hebei measures, pollutant-discharging entities in Hebei
province shall be punished in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations
if such entity has discharged pollutants before obtaining a pollutant discharge
permit.
The trend
in environmental regulation in China is to place more restrictions and
limitations on activities that may affect the environment, and thus any changes
in environmental laws and regulations that result in more stringent and costly
waste handling, storage, transport, disposal or remediation requirements could
have a material adverse effect on ACG’s results of operations or financial
condition. For example, the PRC government has approved revised fuel economy
requirements and may further revise fuel economy requirements in order to
promote the production and sales of more environmentally-friendly and
energy-saving automobiles. These requirements may adversely affect demand for
the vehicles ACG sells. See “Risk Factors Risks Relating to the Motor Vehicle
Industry in China – Imposition of fuel economy standards on PRC automotive
manufacturers and the proposed imposition of higher automobile consumption taxes
may have a negative effect on the revenues and profits of PRC automobile
importers, dealers and distributors, including ACG.”
ACG
incurs significant costs to comply with applicable environmental, health and
safety laws and regulations in the ordinary course of its business. ACG does not
anticipate, however, that the costs of such compliance will have a material
adverse effect on its business, results of operations, cash flows or financial
condition, although such outcome is possible given the nature of its operations
and the extensive environmental, public health and safety regulatory
framework.
Government
Regulations Relating to Foreign Exchange Controls
The
principal regulation governing foreign exchange in the PRC is the Foreign
Currency Administration Rules (IPPS), as amended. Under these rules, the
Renminbi, the PRC’s currency, is freely convertible for trade and service
related foreign exchange transactions (such as normal purchases and sales of
goods and services from providers in foreign countries), but not for direct
investment, loan or investment in securities outside of China unless the prior
approval of the State Administration for Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, of the PRC
is obtained. Foreign investment enterprises, or FIEs, are required to apply to
the SAFE for Foreign Exchange Registration Certificates for FIEs. AutoChina will
be an FIE as a result of the acquisition. With such registration certificates,
which need to be renewed annually, FIEs are allowed to open foreign currency
accounts including a basic account and capital account. Currency translation
within the scope of the basic account, such as remittance of foreign currencies
for payment of dividends, can be effected without requiring the approval of the
SAFE. Such transactions are subject to the consent of investment banks which are
authorized by the SAFE to review basic account currency transactions. However,
conversion of currency in the capital account, including capital items such as
direct investment, loans and securities, still require approval of the SAFE. On
November 21, 2005, the SAFE issued Circular No. 75 on Relevant Issues Concerning
Foreign Exchange Control on Domestic Residents Corporate Financing and Roundtrip
Investment Through Offshore Special Purpose Vehicles. Circular No. 75 confirms
that the use of offshore special purpose vehicles as holding companies for PRC
investments are permitted, but proper foreign exchange registration applications
are required to be reviewed and accepted by the SAFE.
Government
Regulations Relating to Taxation
Prior to
January 1, 2008, the standard enterprise income tax rate was 33%, which was
consisting of a 30% national income tax and a 3% local surcharge, for a
company’s domestic and overseas incomes. Certain of ACG’s automotive dealership
subsidiaries were granted tax incentives in connection with the compliance with
the Employment Promotion Law and the Regulation for the Employment of Disabled
Persons whereby these qualified subsidiaries were fully exempted or allowed a
50% reduction from enterprise income tax for a range of two to three
years.
On March
16, 2007, the National People’s Congress approved and promulgated the EIT law,
which took effect on January 1, 2008. Under the EIT Law, companies are subject
to a uniform tax rate of 25%. The EIT Law provides a five-year transition period
starting from its effective date for those enterprises which were established
before the promulgation date of the EIT Law and which were entitled to a
preferential lower tax rate under the then-effective tax laws or regulations. In
accordance with regulations issued by the State Council, the tax rate of such
enterprises may gradually transition to the uniform tax rate within the
transition period. For those enterprises which are enjoying tax holidays, such
tax holidays may continue until their expiration in accordance with the
regulations issued by the State Council, but where the tax holiday has not yet
started because of losses, such tax holiday shall be deemed to commence from the
first effective year of the EIT Law. Preferential tax treatment would continue
to be given to companies in certain encouraged sectors and to entities
classified as high-technology companies supported by the PRC government.
According to the EIT Law, entities that qualify as high-technology companies
especially supported by the PRC government are expected to benefit from a tax
rate of 15% as compared to the uniform tax rate of 25%. Nevertheless, there can
be no assurances that any particular company will continue to qualify as a
high-technology company supported by the PRC government in the future, and
benefit from such preferential tax rate. Following the effectiveness of the EIT
law, a company’s effective tax rate may increase, unless it is otherwise
eligible for preferential treatment.
Additionally,
under the EIT Law, the income tax rate for dividends payable to non-PRC
investors and derived from sources within the PRC may be increased to 20%. It is
currently unclear in what circumstances a source will be considered as located
within the PRC.
The EIT
Law provides only a framework of the enterprise tax provisions, leaving many
details on the definitions of numerous terms as well as the interpretation and
specific applications of various provisions unclear and unspecified. Any
increase in AutoChina’s tax rate in the future could have a material adverse
effect on its financial conditions and results of operations.
Regulation
of Foreign Currency Exchange and Dividend Distribution
Foreign Currency
Exchange
. Foreign currency exchange in the PRC is governed by a series of
regulations, including the Foreign Currency Administrative Rules (1996), as
amended, and the Administrative Regulations Regarding Settlement, Sale and
Payment of Foreign Exchange (1996), as amended. Under these regulations, the
Renminbi is freely convertible for trade and service-related foreign exchange
transactions, but not for direct investment, loans or investments in securities
outside China without the prior approval of the SAFE. Pursuant to the
Administrative Regulations Regarding Settlement, Sale and Payment of Foreign
Exchange, foreign-invested enterprises in China may purchase foreign exchange
without the approval of the SAFE for trade and service-related foreign exchange
transactions by providing commercial documents evidencing these transactions.
They may also retain foreign exchange, subject to a cap approved by SAFE, to
satisfy foreign exchange liabilities or to pay dividends. However, the relevant
Chinese government authorities may limit or eliminate the ability of
foreign-invested enterprises to purchase and retain foreign currencies in the
future. In addition, foreign exchange transactions for direct investment, loan
and investment in securities outside China are still subject to limitations and
require approvals from the SAFE.
Dividend
Distribution
. The principal laws and regulations in China governing
distribution of dividends by foreign-invested companies include:
|
·
|
The
Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Law (1979), as
amended;
|
|
·
|
The
Regulations for the Implementation of the Sino-foreign Equity Joint
Venture Law (1983), as amended;
|
|
·
|
The
Sino-foreign Cooperative Enterprise Law (1988), as
amended;
|
|
·
|
The
Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Sino-foreign Cooperative
Enterprise Law (1995), as amended;
|
|
·
|
The
Foreign Investment Enterprise Law (1986), as amended;
and
|
|
·
|
The
Regulations of Implementation of the Foreign Investment Enterprise Law
(1990), as amended.
|
Under
these regulations, foreign-invested enterprises in China may pay dividends only
out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with Chinese
accounting standards and regulations. In addition, wholly foreign-owned
enterprises in China are required to set aside at least 10% of their respective
accumulated profits each year, if any, to fund certain reserve funds unless such
reserve funds have reached 50% of their respective registered capital. These
reserves are not distributable as cash dividends.
Periodic
Reporting and Audited Financial Statements
AutoChina
has registered its securities under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and has
reporting obligations, including the requirement to file annual reports with the
SEC. In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
AutoChina’s annual report contains financial statements audited and reported on
by AutoChina’s independent registered public accounting firm.
As a
foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, prescribing the furnishing and content of
proxy statements. In addition, we will not be required under the Exchange Act to
file current reports with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as United States
companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act.
Legal
Proceedings
There is
no litigation currently pending or, to our knowledge, contemplated against
AutoChina or ACG or any of our officers or directors in their capacity as
such.
C. Organizational
structure.
As of
December 31, 2008, we did not have any subsidiaries, and were not part of a
group. On April 9, 2009, we acquired ACG through a share exchange
whereby ACG became our wholly owned subsidiary.
See Item
4.A. “History and development of the Company - ACG Corporate Development and
History.”
D. Property,
plants and equipment.
Prior to
its acquisition of AutoChina Group Inc. (“ACG”), AutoChina had no operations.
ACG was incorporated in the Cayman Islands on July 26, 2007 and currently
consists of two primary reportable segments: the commercial vehicle sales and
leasing segment and the automotive dealership segment. ACG currently conducts
business through over 180 subsidiaries, all of which are majority or wholly
owned, directly or indirectly, by it. Its principal offices are located at 322
Zhongshan East Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050011, People’s Republic of
China, and its telephone number is +86 311 8382 7688.
ACG is a
full-service, integrated retailer of consumer automobiles and related services
and provider of commercial vehicle sales and leasing and related services under
the “Kaiyuan Auto” brand name. ACG’s automotive dealerships sell new and used
automobiles manufactured by Audi, Toyota, First Auto Works (“FAW”), Hyundai,
Buick, Ford, BMW, Chevrolet, ROEWE, Qingling, Cadillac, Peugeot, and Ruida Kia.
ACG also operates commercial vehicle financing centers. Through its
strategically located network of automotive dealerships and commercial vehicle
financing centers, ACG provides one-stop service for the needs of its customers,
including retail sales of new and used consumer automobiles, aftermarket parts
sales, service and repair facilities, commercial vehicle sales and leasing and
related administrative services.
ACG’s
automotive dealerships and commercial vehicle financing centers are principally
located in high traffic areas throughout Hebei, Shanxi, Shandong and Henan
provinces, the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and Beijing and Tianjin regions
of China. Since commencing operations in 2005, ACG has grown to operate 25
automotive dealerships and an insurance brokerage center. Commencing in March
2008 with its first commercial vehicle financing center operated by its
subsidiary, Gaocheng Kaiyuan Transportation Service Co., Ltd., ACG has quickly
grown its network of commercial vehicle financing centers to include 105 centers
as of May 15, 2009.
ACG’s
business strategy consists of providing its customers with competitively-priced
products supported with timely and reliable service through its integrated
automotive dealership and commercial vehicle financing center network. ACG
intends to continue to implement its business strategy, reinforce customer
loyalty and remain a market leader by continuing to develop its automotive
dealerships and commercial vehicle financing centers as its extends its
geographic presence through strategic acquisitions of new locations and
expansions of its existing facilities.
Automotive Dealerships
. ACG’s
automotive dealerships are located in the Hebei and Shanxi provinces and Tianjin
region of China. All of AutoChina’s retail automotive dealerships are “4S
dealerships,” which means that they sell new and used consumer automobiles,
repair and service consumer automobiles and sell spare parts. Each automotive
dealership is dedicated to and serves only one brand of automobile and is
certified by the relevant manufacturer. In addition, each automotive dealership
complies with strict technical specifications and facilities requirements,
procures vehicles and parts from the manufacturer, and receives training and
technical support from the manufacturer. This relationship between each
automotive dealership and manufacturer means manufacturers can ensure that
genuine spare parts are distributed to end-users directly (circumventing
unauthorized dealers and repair shops) and have better control over the
aftermarket for their products. Prior to receiving a franchise from an
automobile manufacturer, ACG has to satisfy certain qualification criteria from
the applicable automobile manufacturer, including having funding available and
agreeing to minimum purchase requirements. The franchises granted to ACG are
non-exclusive and the terms are ranged from one to three years and subject to
extension. Automobile manufacturers provide marketing assistance through
incentives and promotional materials. ACG has entered into committed facilities
line with several financial institutions affiliated with automobile
manufacturers to finance the new automobile inventories at market interest
rates.
In
connection with the sales of new automobiles, ACG may also act as insurance
agent and receive commissions from insurance institutions for the referral of
customers that buy auto insurance.
The
following chart reflects ACG’s franchise at each of its automotive dealership
locations:
|
|
|
Baoding
Tianhua Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
Hyundai
|
Cangzhou
Deyuan Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
Ford
|
Cangzhou
Hengyuan Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Hyundai
|
Cangzhou
Yichang Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Buick
|
Handan
Aohua Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Audi
|
Handan
Baohe Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
BMW
|
Handan
Defeng Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Peugeot
|
Handan
Yacheng Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Ruida
Kia
|
Hebei
Anchang Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
ROEWE
|
Hebei
Liantuo Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
Audi
|
Hebei
Meifeng Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Qingling
|
Hebei
Shengda Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
Ford
|
Hebei
Shengkang Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
Chevrolet
|
Hebei
Shengmei Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
FAW
|
Hebei
Shengwen Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
Hyundai
|
Hebei
Yitong Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Buick
|
Hebei
Yuanxinghang Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Cadillac
|
Hengshui
Dechang Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
Hyundai
|
Hengshui
Yuhua Toyota Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
FAW
Toyota
|
Qinhuangdao
Jianda Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Ford
|
Shijiazhuang
Baohe Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
BMW
|
Shijiazhuang
Xinhua Toyota Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
FAW
Toyota
|
Shijiazhuang
Yuhua Toyota Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
FAW
Toyota
|
Tangshan
Yachang Auto Sales & Service Co., Ltd.
|
|
Ruida
Kia
|
Zhangjiakou
Meihua Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
Hyundai
|
|
|
|
Hebei
Tianmei Insurance Agents Co., Ltd.
|
|
Insurance
Services
|
Commercial Vehicle Financing
Centers
. ACG’s commercial vehicle financing centers are located
throughout Hebei, Shanxi, Shandong and Henan provinces, the Inner Mongolia
Autonomous Region and Beijing and Tianjin regions of China. At each commercial
vehicle financing center, ACG provides financing to assist customers in
purchasing new commercial vehicles. ACG employs a “three full/one quick” service
concept at all its commercial vehicle financing centers, which refers to its
customers’ ability to purchase a commercial vehicle through its full-service
commercial vehicle sales and leasing services, administrative services and
365-day vehicle services in a single convenient transaction. Customers wishing
to purchase a commercial vehicle can go to any ACG commercial vehicle financing
center and select a commercial vehicle from the catalogues and informational
literature provided by ACG. The customer then arranges for financing and related
services with ACG, which involves a credit check and a down payment of 20-30% of
the purchase price. The commercial vehicles are then purchased by ACG from local
third-party dealers and provided to ACG’s customers. During the term of the
financing, which is typically two years, ACG retains title to the commercial
vehicle and in addition provides administrative services for the customers,
including all registration and license processing, payment of surcharges, toll
pass, transportation fees, licenses and insurance, and monthly renewal of the
government-mandated commercial vehicle permits to the customer. Following the
end of the financing period, ACG transfers title to the vehicle to the customer
and provides the customer the option to continue to use ACG to manage the
administrative and vehicle services for a fee. Additionally, ACG sells, as
agent, a complete line of property and casualty insurance, including collision
and liability insurance on the commercial vehicles.
The
following chart indicates the number of ACG commercial vehicle financing centers
in each of the provinces/regions where ACG conducts its business as of May 15,
2007
Chinese
Province / Region
|
|
Number
of Commercial Vehicle
Financing
Centers
|
|
Hebei:
|
|
12
|
|
Shanxi:
|
|
29
|
|
Tianjin:
|
|
1
|
|
Beijing:
|
|
1
|
|
Shandong:
|
|
24
|
|
Henan:
|
|
21
|
|
Inner
Mongolia Autonomous Region:
|
|
17
|
|
Total:
|
|
105
|
|
ACG
leased most of the properties where the dealership stores and commercial vehicle
financing centers are located. ACG expects to continue to lease the majority of
the properties where ACG’s stores or centers are located.
ACG
expects to use cash to purchase property, equipment and improvement in the next
12 months in connection with adding 45 commercial vehicle financing centers. ACG
intends to use cash on hand to finance these purchases. See “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—ACG’s
Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources”
for further information.
ITEM
4A.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
ITEM
5.
|
OPERATING
AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
OVERVIEW
|
AutoChina
International Limited (f/k/a Spring Creek Acquisition Corp.) (“AutoChina” or the
“Company”) is a Cayman Islands exempted company that was incorporated on October
16, 2007, organized as a blank check company for the purpose of acquiring,
through a stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business
combination, or controlling, through contractual arrangements, an operating
business that had its principal operations in the People’s Republic of China, or
PRC, as well as the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the Macau Special
Administrative Region and Taiwan, which is referred to as Greater China.
AutoChina’s Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provided
that it could not consummate a business combination with a business that had its
principal operations outside of Greater China. To avoid being required to
liquidate, as provided in its charter, AutoChina needed, by September 4, 2009,
to consummate a business combination or enter into a letter of intent, agreement
in principle or definitive agreement relating to a business combination, in
which case AutoChina would have been allowed an additional twelve months to
complete a business combination. Under its charter as then in effect, if
AutoChina did not acquire at least majority control of a target business by, at
latest, September 4, 2010, AutoChina would have been required to dissolve and
distribute to its public shareholders the amount in the trust account plus any
remaining net assets.
On April
9, 2009, pursuant to the terms of a share exchange agreement dated February 4,
2009 and amended March 11, 2009, AutoChina acquired all of the outstanding
securities of AutoChina Group Inc. (“ACG”).
ACG, a
company incorporated in Cayman Islands, is an integrated automotive dealership
engaged in sales of automobiles and spare parts and after sales services
consisting of 13 new automobile franchises located primarily in Hebei Province
of China. ACG offers an extensive range of automotive products and services,
including new automobiles, automobile maintenance, replacement parts, collision
repair services, financing, and insurance consulting and other aftermarket
service contracts. In April 2008, ACG commenced providing commercial vehicle
sales and leasing services, which provides financing to customers to acquire
heavy trucks in China. As of September 30, 2008, ACG operated 48 commercial
vehicle financing centers and 26 automotive dealership stores located primarily
in various cities and towns throughout the Northern regions of China. By
December 31, 2008, ACG’s commercial vehicle financing facilities expanded to 103
centers primarily located in major areas in Hebei, Henan, Shanxi and Shandong
provinces, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and Tianjin.
ACG was
incorporated on July 26, 2007, but its automotive dealership business (through
predecessor entities) has been in operation since 2000. ACG’s automotive
dealership revenues grew between 80% and 93% per annum over the past three
years.
As of
December 31, 2008, ACG’s commercial vehicle financing network consisted of the
following number of facilities in the indicated regions: (i) Hebei Province (12
commercial vehicle financing centers), (ii) Shanxi Province (29 commercial
vehicle financing centers), (iii) Shandong Province (24 commercial vehicle
financing centers), (iv) Henan Province (21 commercial vehicle financing
centers), (v) Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (16 commercial vehicle financing
centers), (vi) Tianjin (1 commercial vehicle financing center). Each region is
managed by a regional general manager reporting directly to the vice president
of the commercial vehicle financing business and a regional financial controller
reporting directly to ACG’s Chief Financial Officer. In additional, all the
dealership stores are located in Hebei province and managed by the general
manager of dealership who reports to the Chief Executive Officer directly. The
finance manager in charge of dealerships also reports to ACG’s Chief Financial
Officer directly.
During
the past years, ACG grew its dealership business primarily through acquisitions.
ACG typically seeks to acquire large, profitable, well-established and
well-managed dealerships that are leaders in their respective market areas. From
January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2008, ACG acquired 23 dealership stores and
disposed of or terminated 3 dealership stores. All of the 103 commercial vehicle
financing centers are newly established in fiscal 2008. In January 2009, ACG
established 2 additional commercial vehicle financing centers in Beijing and
Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.
Each
acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase and the corresponding results
of operations of these dealerships are included in ACG’s financial statements
from the date of acquisition. Details of the acquisitions and disposal of
dealerships are shown in Note 4 and Note 5 to the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
ACG’s
operating results reflect the combined performance of each of its interrelated
business activities, which include the sale of vehicles, commercial vehicle
sales and leasing and insurance products, and parts, service and collision
repair services. Historically, each of these activities has been directly or
indirectly impacted by a variety of supply/demand factors, including vehicle
inventories, consumer confidence, discretionary spending, availability and
affordability of consumer credit, manufacturer incentives, fuel prices and
interest rates. For example, during periods of sustained economic downturn or
significant supply/demand imbalances, new vehicle sales may be negatively
impacted as consumers tend to shift their purchases to used vehicles. Some
consumers may even delay their purchasing decisions altogether, electing instead
to repair their existing vehicles. In such cases, however, ACG believes the new
vehicle sales impact on ACG’s overall business is mitigated by its ability to
offer other products and services, such as used vehicles and parts, service and
collision repair services.
ACG
generally experiences higher volumes of vehicle sales for dealerships in the
first and fourth calendar quarters of each year. This seasonality is generally
attributable to consumer buying trends and the timing of manufacturer new
vehicle model introductions.
As a
result, ACG’s revenues, cash flows and operating income are typically lower in
the second and third quarters and higher in the first and fourth quarters. Other
factors unrelated to seasonality, such as changes in economic condition and
manufacturer incentive programs, may exaggerate seasonal or cause
counter-seasonal fluctuations in ACG’s revenues and operating
income.
ACG’S
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion and financial information relates to periods prior to the
acquisition of ACG by AutoChina.
Overview
For the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, ACG realized net income of $8.0
million, $4.8 million and $2.7 million, respectively.
ACG’s
gross margins as a percentage of sales have been fairly consistent from year to
year. Over the last three fiscal years, ACG’s gross margins as a percentage of
sales have ranged between approximately 5.3% and 5.9%. ACG’s gross margins are
set based upon the cost of the vehicle purchased, with higher-priced vehicles
typically having higher gross margin percentages. In recent years, ACG’s gross
margins have been improved by the increase in the average retail sales price (a
function of a higher purchase price) and the tightened operating costs, mostly
related to economy of scale and the tightened vehicle repair costs.
Additionally, the newly commenced commercial vehicle sales and leasing
business has enjoyed a gross margin of approximately 5.8%. ACG expects
that the gross margin percentage will not change significantly in the near
term.
Hiring,
training and retaining qualified associates are critical to ACG’s success. The
rate at which ACG adds new stores and is able to implement operating initiatives
is limited by the number of trained managers ACG has at its disposal. Excessive
turnover, particularly at the store/center manager level, could impact the
ability to add new stores and to meet operational initiatives. ACG has added
resources to recruit, train and develop personnel, especially manager positions.
ACG expects to continue to invest in the development of ACG’s workforce in
fiscal 2009 and beyond to meet the growth of the business network.
Very
limited hedging transactions are available in China to reduce AutoChina’s
exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date, neither AutoChina nor ACG have
entered into any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce their exposure to
foreign currency exchange risk. While AutoChina may decide to enter into hedging
transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedging
transactions may be limited and AutoChina may not be able to successfully hedge
AutoChina’s exposure at all. In addition, AutoChina’s currency exchange losses
may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict AutoChina’s
ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currency.
2008
Compared to 2007
Revenues
increased $145.9 million, or 49.5%, in fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007,
as a result of (i) revenue growth from an additional five automotive dealership
stores acquired during the period ($27.1 million), (ii) increased demand for
automobiles ($84.7 million), and (iii) revenues from the newly commenced
commercial vehicle sales and leasing business ($34.1 million).
Cost of
sales increased 49.6% in fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007. Gross margins
are set based upon the cost of the vehicle purchased, with higher-priced
vehicles typically having higher gross margin percentages. Gross margins were
maintained at similar level in recent periods as the average retail
sales price of vehicles (a function of a higher purchase price) were considered
stable and to a lesser extent by reduced operating costs resulted from economies
of scale and ACG’s effort to reduce vehicle repair costs.
Selling
and marketing expenses, as a percentage of sales, increased 0.2% to 1.5% in
fiscal 2008 as compared to 1.3% in fiscal 2007. In dollar terms, the selling and
marketing expenses increased by $2.7 million. ACG experienced an increase in
expenditures associated with the opening of new branch/stores for the commercial
vehicle sales and leasing business. ACG has also incurred additional promotion
costs in the automotive dealership business to attract higher sales
volumes.
General
and administrative expense, as a percentage of sales, slightly decreased 0.1% to
1.7% in fiscal 2008 from 1.8% in fiscal 2007. The percentage decrease was
principally the result of higher sales levels as a large majority of ACG’s
general and administrative expenses are generally fixed in nature. In
dollar terms, overall expenses increased $2.1 million which consisted primarily
of increased payroll costs. Payroll costs increased due to increased office
staff, which mostly relates to the newly commenced commercial vehicle sales and
leasing business.
Interest
expense, as a percentage of sales, slightly decreased 0.1% to 0.6% in fiscal
2008 from 0.7% in the same period in 2007, although the total amount increased
by $0.7 million (32.9%). The decrease principally resulted from the result of
lower average borrowing levels and lower average interest rates on the credit
during the year.
Interest
income, as a percentage of sales, increased 0.5% to 0.6% in fiscal 2008 from
0.1% in the same period in 2007. The increase was primarily due to the interest
income derived from the commercial vehicle sales and leasing business commenced
in April 2008.
The
effective income tax rate in fiscal 2008 was 26.9%. This rate is higher than the
fiscal 2007 of 17.7% due to the distribution of profits among ACG’s operating
subsidiaries.
2007
Compared to 2006
Revenues
increased $142.0 million, or 93.0%, in fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006,
principally as a result of (i) revenue growth from four automotive
dealership stores acquired during the fiscal 2007, (ii) increased demand for
automobiles, and (iii) revenues from dealerships established in fiscal 2006 that
operated a full 12 months in fiscal 2007.
Cost of
sales increased 91.6% in fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006. ACG’s gross
margins are set based upon the cost of the vehicle purchased, with higher-priced
vehicles typically having higher gross margin percentages. ACG’s gross margins
have been slightly improved by the increase in the average retail sales price (a
function of a higher purchase price) and to a lesser extent by reduced operating
costs resulting primarily from economies of scale and cost control initiatives.
This resulted in gross margins increasing from 5.3% in fiscal 2006 to 5.9% in
fiscal 2007.
Selling
and marketing expenses, as a percentage of sales, decreased 0.3% to 1.3% in
fiscal 2007 as compared to 1.6% in fiscal 2006. In dollar terms, the selling and
marketing expenses increased by $1.5 million. ACG experienced an increase in
expenditures associated with additional promotional costs.
General
and administrative expense, as a percentage of sales, was 1.6% in fiscal 2006
and 1.8% in fiscal 2007. In dollar terms, overall expenses increased $3.0
million, which consisted primarily of increased payroll and office costs.
Payroll costs increased due to the increase number of staff and related costs,
in relation to the increased number of dealership stores.
Interest
expense, as a percentage of sales, increased 0.2% to 0.7% in fiscal 2007 from
0.5% in fiscal 2006. In dollar terms, it has been increased by $1.4 million
(192.0%). The increase was principally the result of increased average borrowing
levels and increased average interest rates on the credit during the period.
Interest income, as a percentage of sales, maintained at 0.1 % for both
years.
The
effective income tax rate in fiscal 2007 was 17.7%, while it was (1.0%) in
fiscal 2006. This rate is higher than historical rates since most of the income
generated prior to 2007 was non-taxable.
Financial
Condition
The
following table sets forth the major balance sheet accounts of ACG at December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
$
|
40,824
|
|
|
$
|
24,734
|
|
|
$
|
25,885
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
37,463
|
|
|
|
26,910
|
|
|
|
24,807
|
|
Net
investment in sales-type leases
|
|
|
23,359
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Property,
equipment and improvements, net
|
|
|
26,907
|
|
|
|
18,030
|
|
|
|
14,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor
plan notes payable—manufacturer affiliated
|
|
$
|
12,379
|
|
|
$
|
10,808
|
|
|
$
|
7,238
|
|
Trade
notes payable
|
|
|
60,134
|
|
|
|
35,828
|
|
|
|
32,318
|
|
Restricted
cash increased in line with the trade notes payable, as ACG used
financing to purchase vehicles. In December 31, 2008, restricted
cash increased by $16.1 million (65.1%) compared with December 31,
2007. The increment of the trade notes payables was slightly higher,
increasing $24.3 million (67.8%).
Inventory
balances continuously increased throughout the period. As
of December 31, 2008, inventory was $37.4 as compared to $26.9 million
on December 31, 2007 (39.2%), while revenue increased 49.5%. The
growth was due to the increased number of dealerships from 21 to
25.
Net
investment in leases began in April 2008 as a result of the commercial vehicle
sales and leasing business under which ACG enters into monthly installment
arrangements with customers for a 2-year period.
Property,
equipment and improvements increased significantly to $26.9 million in December
31, 2008, an increase of $8.9 million (49.2%) as compared with December 31,
2007. The increased expenditures primarily relate to costs associated with
expanding a number of existing dealership stores and the commercial vehicle
financing centers.
Floor plan notes
payable—manufacturer affiliated
relates to the committed facility lines
entered into with several financial institutions affiliated with automobile
manufacturers to finance most of the new automobile inventories. It increased to
$12.4 million in December 31, 2008, (an increase of $1.6 million (14.5%)
compared with December 31, 2007). This increased as a result of the
increased level of automobile inventories.
Trade
notes payable were promissory notes which were secured by cash deposits with
banks (restricted cash) and certain automobile inventories. Trade notes
payable was $60.1 million in December 31, 2008, which increased by $24.3
million (67.8%) compared with December 31, 2007. This increase was a
result of the increased level of automobile inventories and revenue
growth.
ACG’s
borrowings fluctuate primarily based upon a number of factors including (i)
revenues, (ii) changes in account and notes receivables, (iii) capital
expenditures, and (iv) inventory changes. Historically, income from continuing
operations, as well as borrowings on the revolving credit facilities, has
funded account and notes receivables growth, inventory growth and capital
expenditures.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
following table sets forth certain historical information with respect to ACG’s
statements of cash flows (in thousands):
|
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
21,325
|
|
|
$
|
(732
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,498
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(26,349
|
)
|
|
|
(3,315
|
)
|
|
|
(16,425
|
)
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
8,169
|
|
|
|
9,768
|
|
|
|
16,132
|
|
Effect
of exchange rate change
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
4,586
|
|
|
$
|
5,371
|
|
|
$
|
2,920
|
|
Operating Activities.
ACG
generated $21.3 million from operating activities in fiscal 2008 and $3.5
million in fiscal 2006, while it used $0.7 million in fiscal 2007. Since ACG
continued to expand its automotive dealership business since 2006 and commenced
its commercial vehicle sales and leasing business in 2008, cash flow from
operating activities increased during the period.
Investing Activities.
Net
cash used in investing activities was $26.3 million in fiscal 2008, $3.3 million
in fiscal 2007 and $16.4 million in fiscal 2006.
In
addition to purchase of property, equipment and improvement, capital
expenditures for all periods included the cash paid for the acquisition of
the automotive dealerships. Furthermore, the change in restricted cash, which
was pledged to banks for borrowings, has also affected the net cash used in
investing activities.
Financing Activities.
Net
cash provided by financing activities was $8.2 million in fiscal 2008, $9.8
million in fiscal 2007 and $16.1 million in fiscal 2006. In fiscal 2008, ACG
increased total net borrowings by $1.3 million and had a capital contribution of
$11.4 million from its shareholders. ACG increased total net
borrowings by $0.6 million and $5.4 million during fiscal 2007 and 2006,
respectively. In addition, it had capital contributions of $8.4 million and
$10.0 million from its shareholders, during the fiscal 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Historically,
most or all of available cash is used to fund notes receivable, inventory
growth and for capital expenditures. To the extent notes receivables and
inventory growth and capital expenditures exceed income from operations,
generally ACG increases the borrowings under facilities and from
affiliates.
ACG
leased most of the properties where the dealership stores and commercial vehicle
financing centers are located. ACG expects to continue to lease the majority of
the properties where ACG’s stores or centers are located.
ACG
expanded dealerships significantly in 2006, and the capital expenditures have
continuously increased thereafter. After ACG restructured its dealerships
in 2007, cash used in investing activities declined. Since April 2008, a
significant amount of capital ($2.1 million) has been used in connection with
the commencement of ACG’s commercial vehicle sales and leasing business.
Additional capital expenditures were required for existing
dealerships.
At
December 31, 2008, ACG had $17.4 million of cash on hand, with $17.3 million of
cash held in Renminbi. On a short-term basis, ACG’s principal sources of
liquidity includes income from operations and short-term borrowings from
financial institutions including notes payables and trade notes payable. On a
longer-term basis, ACG expects its principal sources of liquidity to consist of
income from operations, borrowings from financial institutions and/or fixed
interest term loans. Further, while ACG has no specific plans to issue debt or
equity securities, ACG believes, if necessary, it could raise additional capital
through the issuance of such securities or shareholders loans.
ACG
expects to use cash to (i) increase its notes receivables in line with its
revenue growth, and (ii) purchase property and equipment and
make improvements on existing property in the next 12 months in
connection with adding 45 commercial vehicle financing centers. ACG believes
that it has adequate liquidity to satisfy its capital needs for the foreseeable
future.
ACG’s
borrowings primarily consisted of (i) Floor plan notes payable—manufacturer
affiliated; and (ii) Trade notes payable.
Floor plan notes
payable—manufacturer affiliated
relates to the committed facility lines
entered into with several financial institutions affiliated with automobile
manufacturers to finance most of the new automobile inventories. It was $12.4
million in December 31, 2008, (an increase of $1.6 million (14.5%) compared with
December 31, 2007). It increased as a result of the increased level of
automobile inventories. The floor plan notes payables bear interest at rates in
the range of 6.64% to 9.36% as of December 31, 2008 and are generally for a term
in a range of 6 months to 1 year. However, certain floor plan notes
payable are interest free in the event the note is repaid in 60-90
days.
Trade notes payable
were bank
guaranteed promissory notes which were secured by cash deposits with banks
(restricted cash) and certain automobile inventories. It was $60.1 million on
December 31, 2008, which increased by $24.3 million (67.8%) as compared with
December 31, 2007. The increase resulted from the increased level of
automobile inventories and revenue growth. The trade notes payable are
non-interest bearing and generally mature within six months.
ACG’s
borrowings fluctuate primarily based upon a number of factors including (i)
revenues, (ii) account and notes receivables changes, (iii) capital
expenditures, and (iv) inventory changes. Historically, income from continuing
operations, as well as borrowings on the revolving credit facilities, have
driven account and notes receivables growth, inventory growth and capital
expenditures.
Cash and
cash equivalents as of December 31, 2008 are held by ACG’s subsidiaries and
variable interest entities. These cash balances cannot be transferred to
AutoChina by loan or advance according to existing PRC laws and regulations.
However, these cash balances can be utilized by AutoChina for its normal
operations pursuant to the Enterprise Agreements.
Regulations
on Dividend Distribution
The
principal laws and regulations in China governing distribution of dividends by
foreign-invested companies include:
|
·
|
The
Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Law (1979), as
amended;
|
|
·
|
The
Regulations for the Implementation of the Sino-foreign Equity Joint
Venture Law (1983), as amended;
|
|
·
|
The
Sino-foreign Cooperative Enterprise Law (1988), as
amended;
|
|
·
|
The
Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Sino-foreign Cooperative
Enterprise Law (1995), as amended;
|
|
·
|
The
Foreign Investment Enterprise Law (1986), as amended;
and
|
|
·
|
The
Regulations of Implementation of the Foreign Investment Enterprise Law
(1990), as amended.
|
Under
these regulations, foreign-invested enterprises in China may pay dividends only
out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with Chinese
accounting standards and regulations. In addition, wholly foreign-owned
enterprises in China are required to set aside at least 10% of their respective
accumulated profits each year, if any, to fund certain reserve funds unless such
reserve funds have reached 50% of their respective registered capital. These
reserves are not distributable as cash dividends.
Contractual
Payment Obligations
The
following is a summary of ACG’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2008,
including renewal periods under operating leases that are reasonably assured (in
thousands):
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than
1 Year
|
|
|
1 to 3
Years
|
|
|
3 to 5
Years
|
|
|
More than
5 Years
|
|
Trade
notes payable
|
|
$
|
60,134
|
|
|
$
|
60,134
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
Operating
leases
|
|
|
25,106
|
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
3,132
|
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
|
|
17,599
|
|
Floor
plan notes payable manufacturer affiliated
|
|
|
12,379
|
|
|
|
12,379
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Notes
payable
|
|
|
3,921
|
|
|
|
3,921
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Capital
commitment
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
101,585
|
|
|
$
|
78,227
|
|
|
$
|
3,132
|
|
|
$
|
2,627
|
|
|
$
|
17,599
|
|
ACG
leases certain facilities under long-term, non-cancelable leases and
month-to-month leases. These leases are accounted for as operating
leases.
For a
description of the anticipated sources of funds needed to fulfill these
commitments, please refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in this Annual
Report.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
ACG has
entered into operating leases for all of its dealership and commercial vehicle
financing stores and office facilities. Generally, the leases for its commercial
vehicle financing stores are for periods of one to three years. The leases for
its dealership stores and office facilities are typically for periods over ten
years. ACG uses leasing arrangements to maintain flexibility in its commercial
vehicle financing store locations and to preserve capital. ACG expects to
continue to lease the majority of its store and office facilities under
arrangements substantially consistent with the past.
Rent
expense for all operating leases amounted to $1,348,000, $871,000 and $563,000
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Other
than its operating leases, ACG is not a party to any off-balance sheet
arrangement.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
discussion and analysis of ACG’s financial condition and results of operations
is based upon its consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The preparation of these financial statements requires ACG to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. On an ongoing basis, ACG evaluates its estimates, including those
related to accounts receivable and the related provision for doubtful accounts,
tangible and intangible long-lived assets, the assessment of the valuation
allowance on deferred tax assets, the purchase price allocation on acquisitions,
and contingencies and litigation, among others. ACG bases its estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are
not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions. ACG believes that the
following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements:
goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets, income taxes and accounts
receivable.
Goodwill,
Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets. Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142), requires
purchased intangible assets other than goodwill to be amortized over their
useful lives unless these lives are determined to be indefinite. SFAS No. 142
requires goodwill to be tested for impairment at least on an annual basis and
more often under certain circumstances, and written down when impaired. An
interim impairment test is required if an event occurs or conditions change that
would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below the
carrying value.
Impairment
losses are limited to the carrying value of the goodwill, which represents the
excess of the carrying amount of a reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied
fair value of that goodwill. In determining the estimated future cash flows, ACG
considers current and projected future levels of income based on management’s
plans for that business, as well as business trends, prospects and market and
economic conditions.
ACG
accounts for the impairment of long-lived assets, such as property and equipment
and intangible assets, under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No.
144). SFAS No. 144 establishes the accounting for impairment of long-lived
tangible and intangible assets other than goodwill and for the disposal of a
business. Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, ACG periodically evaluates, at least
annually, whether facts or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of its
depreciable assets to be held and used may not be recoverable. If such
circumstances are determined to exist, an estimate of undiscounted future cash
flows produced by the long-lived asset, or the appropriate grouping of assets,
is compared to the carrying value to determine whether impairment exists. In the
event that the carrying amount of long-lived assets exceeds the undiscounted
future cash flows, then the carrying amount of such assets is adjusted to their
fair value. ACG reports an impairment cost as a charge to operations at the time
it is recognized.
Income
Taxes. ACG accounts for income taxes under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109). SFAS No. 109
requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected
future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which
those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
the statement of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A
valuation allowance is established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax
assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Accounts
Receivable. Accounts receivable, which are unsecured, are stated at the amount
ACG expects to collect. ACG maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for
estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required
payments. ACG evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable based on a
combination of factors, including customer credit-worthiness and historical
collection experience. Management reviews the receivable aging and adjusts the
allowance based on historical experience, financial condition of the customer
and other relevant current economic factors. As of December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, a majority of the trade receivable balances were due from governmental
agencies which ACG believed are collectible in full and a majority of the
accounts receivable related to warranty claims are primarily due from
manufacturers. Therefore, the management determined no allowance for
uncollectible amounts is required. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to
accounts receivables from the sale of automobiles are limited because a large
number of diverse customers comprise ACG’s customer base, thus spreading the
trade credit risk.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, which requires additional disclosures related to derivatives
instruments and hedging activities. These enhanced disclosures will discuss (a)
how and why a company uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and
its related interpretations and (c) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items affect a company’s financial position, results of operations and
cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
November 15, 2008, with earlier adoption allowed. ACG is currently evaluating
the impact of adopting SFAS No. 161 and anticipates that this statement will not
have a significant impact on the reporting of ACG’s results of
operations.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations (SFAS No.141(R)), which replaces SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations. SFAS No.141(R) retains the underlying concepts of SFAS 141 in that
all business combinations are still required to be accounted for at fair value
under the acquisition method of accounting but SFAS No.141(R) changed the method
of applying the acquisition method in a number of significant aspects.
Acquisition costs will generally be expensed as incurred; non-controlling
interests will be valued at fair value at the acquisition date; in-process
research and development will be recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived
intangible asset at the acquisition date; restructuring costs associated with a
business combination will generally be expensed subsequent to the acquisition
date; and changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax
uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will affect income tax
expense. SFAS No.141(R) is effective on a prospective basis for all business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008, with the exception of the
accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax
contingencies. SFAS No.141(R) amends SFAS No. 109 such that adjustments made to
valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated
with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of SFAS No.141(R)
would also apply the provisions of SFAS No.141(R). Early adoption is not
permitted.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51. This statement is
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with earlier adoption prohibited. This
statement requires the recognition of a non-controlling interest (minority
interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from
the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to the
non-controlling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face
of the income statement. It also amends certain of ARB No. 51s consolidation
procedures for consistency with the requirements of SFAS No.141(R). This
statement also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests
of the parent and its non-controlling interest. ACG is currently evaluating the
impact of this new statement on ACG's financial condition and results of
operations.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest
Rate Risk
AutoChina’s
exposure to interest rate risk primarily relates to its outstanding debts and
interest income generated by excess cash, which is mostly held in
interest-bearing bank deposits. AutoChina has not used derivative financial
instruments in its investment portfolio. Interest-earning instruments carry a
degree of interest rate risk. As of March 31, 2009, AutoChina’s total
outstanding loans amounted to $29.9 million with interest rates in the range of
6.6% to 9.1% per annum. AutoChina has not been exposed, nor does it
anticipate being exposed, to material risks due to changes in market interest
rates.
Foreign
Currency Risk
Substantially
all of AutoChina’s revenues and expenditures are denominated in Renminbi. As a
result, fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollars and Renminbi
will affect AutoChina’s financial results in U.S. dollars terms without giving
effect to any underlying change in AutoChina’s business or results of
operations. The Renminbi’s exchange rate with the U.S. dollar and other
currencies is affected by, among other things, changes in China’s political and
economic conditions. The exchange rate for conversion of Renminbi into foreign
currencies is heavily influenced by intervention in the foreign exchange market
by the People’s Bank of China. From 1995 until July 2005, the People’s Bank of
China intervened in the foreign exchange market to maintain an exchange rate of
approximately 8.3 Renminbi per U.S. dollar. On July 21, 2005, the PRC
government changed this policy and began allowing modest appreciation of the
Renminbi versus the U.S. dollar. However, the Renminbi is restricted to a rise
or fall of no more than 0.5% per day versus the U.S. dollar, and the
People’s Bank of China continues to intervene in the foreign exchange market to
prevent significant short-term fluctuations in the Renminbi exchange rate.
Nevertheless, under China’s current exchange rate regime, the Renminbi may
appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the
medium to long term. There remains significant international pressure on the PRC
government to adopt a substantial liberalization of its currency policy, which
could result in a further and more significant appreciation in the value of the
Renminbi against the U.S. dollar.
Very
limited hedging transactions are available in China to reduce AutoChina’s
exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date, AutoChina has not entered into
any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce its exposure to foreign currency
exchange risk. While AutoChina may decide to enter into hedging transactions in
the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedging transactions may
be limited and it may not be able to successfully hedge its exposure at all. In
addition, AutoChina’s currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange
control regulations that restrict its ability to convert Renminbi into foreign
currency.
Seasonality
ACG’s
second and third fiscal quarters (April through September) have historically
been slower for dealership sales. Conversely, ACG’s first and fourth fiscal
quarters (January through March and October through December) have historically
been the busiest times for car sales. Therefore, ACG generally realize a higher
proportion of its revenue and operating profit during the first and fourth
fiscal quarters. ACG expects this trend to continue in future periods. If
conditions arise that impair vehicle sales during the first or fourth fiscal
quarters, the adverse effect on ACG’s revenues and operating profit for the year
could be disproportionately large.
Impact
of Inflation
Inflation
has not historically been a significant factor impacting ACG’s
results.
AUTOCHINA’S
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion and financial information relates to periods prior to the
acquisition of ACG by AutoChina.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Deferred
income taxes are provided for the differences between bases of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. A valuation
allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the
amount expected to be realized.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”
(“SFAS No. 157”), which establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, clarifies the
definition of fair value within that framework and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other
standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair
value, except for the measurement of share-based payments. AutoChina adopted
SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008. Additional disclosure required as a
result of AutoChina’s implementation of SFAS No. 157 in 2008 is presented in
Note 4 to AutoChina’s December 31, 2008 financial
statements. However, since the issuance of SFAS No. 157, the FASB has
issued several FASB Staff Positions (FSPs) to clarify the application of SFAS
No. 157. FSPs apply to financial assets within the scope of
accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements in
accordance with SFAS No. 157. In February 2008, the FASB released FSP
No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”, which delayed the
effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). In
October 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active”, which clarifies
the application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not active and provides
guidance in key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial
asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. FSP No.
157-3 became effective immediately, and includes prior period financial
statements that have not yet been issued. In April 2009, the FASB
issued FSP No. 157-4, “Determining the Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly”, which provides additional guidance for
estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157, when the volume and level
of activity for the asset or liability have significantly
decreased. FSP No. 157-4 also provides guidance on identifying
circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP No.
157-4 is effective for interim and periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall
be applied prospectively. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 and the related FSP’s did
not have any impact on AutoChina’s consolidated financial statements, except for
additional disclosures as described in Note 4 to AutoChina’s December 31, 2008
financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities” (“SFAS No. 159”), which provides companies with an option to
report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS
No. 159’s objective is to reduce both complexity in accounting for
financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related
assets and liabilities differently. Generally accepted accounting principles
have required different measurement attributes for different assets and
liabilities that can create artificial volatility in earnings. SFAS No. 159
helps to mitigate this type of accounting-induced volatility by enabling
companies to report related assets and liabilities at fair value, which would
likely reduce the need for companies to comply with detailed rules for
hedge accounting. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure
requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose
different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities.
SFAS No. 159 requires companies to provide additional information that will
help investors and other users of financial statements to more easily understand
the effect of AutoChina’s choice to use fair value on its earnings. SFAS
No. 159 also requires companies to display the fair value of those assets
and liabilities for which AutoChina has chosen to use fair value on the face of
the balance sheet. SFAS No. 159 does not eliminate disclosure requirements
included in other accounting standards, including requirements for disclosures
about fair value measurements included in SFAS No. 157 and SFAS
No. 107. AutoChina adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008,
but did not elect the fair value option for any financial assets or liabilities.
Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have any impact on AutoChina’s
consolidated financial statement presentation or disclosures.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”), which
requires an acquirer to recognize in its financial statements as of the
acquisition date (i) the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities
assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, measured at their fair
values on the acquisition date, and (ii) goodwill as the excess of the
consideration transferred plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interest in
the acquiree at the acquisition date over the fair values of the identifiable
net assets acquired. Acquisition-related costs, which are the costs an acquirer
incurs to effect a business combination, will be accounted for as expenses in
the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are received,
except that costs to issue debt or equity securities will be recognized in
accordance with other applicable GAAP. SFAS No. 141(R) makes
significant amendments to other Statement of Financial Accounting Standards and
other authoritative guidance to provide additional guidance or to conform the
guidance in that literature to that provided in SFAS No. 141(R). SFAS
No. 141(R) also provides guidance as to what information is to be
disclosed to enable users of financial statements to evaluate the nature and
financial effects of a business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. AutoChina adopted SFAS No. 141(R) on January
1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) affected how AutoChina
accounted for the acquisition of AutoChina Group Inc., as described in Note 10
to AutoChina’s December 31, 2008 financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements —
an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No. 160”), which requires that
ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, and
the amount of consolidated net income, be clearly identified, labeled and
presented in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 also
requires that once a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling
equity investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair
value. Sufficient disclosures are required to clearly identify and
distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the
noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 amends FASB No. 128 to
provide that the calculation of earnings per share amounts in the consolidated
financial statements will continue to be based on the amounts attributable to
the parent. SFAS No. 160 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or
after December 15, 2008, and requires retroactive adoption of the
presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests.
All other requirements are applied prospectively. AutoChina adopted SFAS
No. 160 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 did not have any
impact on AutoChina’s consolidated financial statement presentation or
disclosures.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities —
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS
No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS
No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”
(“SFAS No. 133”). The objective of SFAS No. 161 is to provide users of
financial statements with an enhanced understanding of how and why an entity
uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and
how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161
requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using
derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and
losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related
contingent features in derivative agreements. SFAS No. 161 applies to
all derivative financial instruments, including bifurcated derivative
instruments (and nonderivative instruments that are designed and qualify as
hedging instruments pursuant to paragraphs 37 and 42 of SFAS No. 133) and
related hedged items accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related
interpretations. SFAS No. 161 also amends certain provisions of SFAS
No. 133. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with
early application encouraged. SFAS No. 161 encourages, but does not
require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption.
AutoChina adopted SFAS No. 161 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS
No. 161 did not have any impact on AutoChina’s consolidated financial statement
presentation or disclosures.
In
May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS
No. 162”). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting
principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the
preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are
presented in conformity with GAAP. SFAS No. 162 became effective on
November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 162 did not have any impact on
AutoChina’s consolidated financial statement presentation or
disclosures.
In
June 2008, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue
No. 07-05, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is
Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (“EITF 07-05”). EITF 07-05 mandates a two-step
process for evaluating whether an equity-linked financial instrument or embedded
feature is indexed to the entity’s own stock. Warrants that a company issues
that contain a strike price adjustment feature, upon the adoption of EITF 07-05,
results in the instruments no longer being considered indexed to the company’s
own stock. Accordingly, adoption of EITF 07-05 will change the current
classification (from equity to liability) and the related accounting for such
warrants outstanding at that date. EITF 07-05 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. AutoChina adopted EITF 07-05 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of
EITF 07-05 did not have any impact on AutoChina’s consolidated financial
statement presentation or disclosures.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP 107-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments”, which requires disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well
as in annual financial statements. FSP 107-1 also amends APB Opinion
No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting”, to require those disclosures in
summarized financial information at interim reporting. FSP 107-1 is effective
for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption
permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. AutoChina is
currently evaluating the potential impact of FSP 107-1 on its consolidated
financial statement presentation and disclosures.
Management
does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective,
accounting standards or pronouncements, if currently adopted, would have a
material effect on AutoChina’s consolidated financial statement presentation or
disclosures.
Results
of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2008
AutoChina
reported a net loss of $145,541 for the year ended December 31, 2008. Prior to
acquiring ACG, AutoChina’s only significant income was from interest generated
in the trust account.
Overall,
for the year ended December 31, 2008, AutoChina incurred fees and expenses of
$492,355 in connection with the acquisition of ACG and general and
administrative expenses of $327,935. For the year ended December 31, 2008,
AutoChina’s trust account earned interest of $733,745 before the allocation of
$58,996 in interest to shares subject to possible redemption.
Results
of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2007
AutoChina
had a net loss of $23,428 for the year ended December 31, 2007 as a result of
formation and operating costs. Additionally, deferred offering costs of $199,957
were incurred in 2007. These costs consisted of professional fees of $189,437
and regulatory and filing fees of approximately $10,520. AutoChina had no income
in 2007. Prior to acquiring ACG, AutoChina had no revenues and incurred losses
due to management’s expenses relating to locating a target business to
acquire.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
On
February 27, 2008, AutoChina completed a private placement of 1,430,000 warrants
to James Cheng-Jee Sha, AutoChina’s former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
and current director, Diana Chia-Huei Liu, AutoChina’s former President and
current director, William Tsu-Cheng Yu, AutoChina’s former Chief Financial
Officer and director, Jimmy (Jim) Yee-Ming Wu, AutoChina’s former Chief
Operating Officer and director and Gary Han Ming Chang, AutoChina’s former
Special Advisor, collectively referred to as AutoChina’s “founding
shareholders,” and received net proceeds of $1,430,000. On March 4, 2008,
AutoChina consummated its initial public offering of 4,500,000 units. On March
13, 2008, the underwriters of AutoChina’s initial public offering exercised
their overallotment option in full, for a total of an additional 675,000 units
(over and above the 4,500,000 units sold in the initial public offering) for an
aggregate offering of 5,175,000 units. Each unit in the public offering
consisted of one ordinary share and one redeemable ordinary share purchase
warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase from AutoChina one
ordinary share at an exercise price of $5.00. AutoChina’s ordinary shares and
warrants started trading separately as of March 28, 2008.
The net
proceeds from the sale of AutoChina’s warrants and units, after deducting
certain offering expenses of approximately $3,458,000, including underwriting
discounts of approximately $2,898,000, were approximately $39,372,000.
Approximately $40,671,000 of the proceeds from the initial public offering and
the private placement was placed in a trust account for AutoChina’s benefit. The
trust account contained $1,449,000 of the underwriter’s compensation which was
paid to them upon the consummation of the business combination. Except for up to
$1,050,000 in interest that was earned on the funds contained in the trust
account that was able to be released to AutoChina to be used as working capital,
of which approximately $450,000 had been released as of December 31, 2008,
AutoChina was not otherwise able to access the amounts held in the trust until
AutoChina consummated a business combination. The amounts held outside of the
trust account were available to be used by AutoChina to provide for business,
legal and accounting due diligence on prospective acquisitions and continuing
general and administrative expenses. From October 16, 2007 (the date of
AutoChina’s inception) through December 31, 2007, AutoChina had operating
expenses of $23,428 and deferred offering costs of $199,957. From January 1,
2008 through March 4, 2008 (the date on which AutoChina consummated its initial
public offering), AutoChina had operating expenses of $356 and offering costs of
$196,659, exclusive of the $2,898,000 in underwriting discounts. As of December
31, 2007, AutoChina had no amount held in the trust account and as of December
31, 2008 there was approximately $40,855,000 held in the trust account, which
included deferred underwriting fees of $1,449,000. Additionally, as of December
31, 2008, AutoChina held approximately $77,000 outside of the trust account to
fund its working capital requirements.
AutoChina
used substantially all of the net proceeds of the initial public offering to
acquire ACG, including identifying and evaluating prospective acquisition
candidates, selecting the target business, and structuring, negotiating and
consummating the business combination including various equity based
transactions that utilized most of the amounts held in trust at the
closing.
Commencing
on February 27, 2008 through April 9, 2009, AutoChina incurred a fee of $7,500
per month for office space. The office space was provided by LiveABC of Beijing,
China, an affiliate of James Cheng-Jee Sha, AutoChina’s then-Chief Executive
Officer and director.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Prior to
its acquisition of ACG on April 9, 2009, AutoChina never entered into any
off-balance sheet financing arrangements, never established any special purpose
entities, and had not guaranteed any debt or commitments of other entities or
entered into any options on non-financial assets.
Contractual
Obligations
Prior to
its acquisition of ACG on April 9, 2009, AutoChina did not have any long term
debt, capital lease obligations, operating lease obligations, purchase
obligations or other long term liabilities. However, as discussed above,
AutoChina had entered into a lease with the landlord of AutoChina’s office
facilities at a monthly rental of approximately $7,500, which lease terminated
upon the acquisition of ACG on April 9, 2009.
ITEM
6.
|
DIRECTORS,
SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
|
A. Directors
and Senior Management.
AutoChina’s
current directors, executive officers and key employees are as
follows:
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Yong
Hui Li
|
47
|
Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
Chen
Lei
|
43
|
Senior
Vice President
|
Johnson
Lau
|
35
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
Wei
Xing
|
48
|
Chief
Operating Officer
|
Hui
Kai Yan
|
44
|
Director
and Secretary
|
James
Cheng-Jee Sha
|
57
|
Director
|
Diana
Chia-Huei Liu
|
43
|
Director
|
Thomas
Luen-Hung Lau
|
55
|
Director
|
Yong Hui Li
has served as AutoChina’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and as a
member of AutoChina’s Board of Directors since April 9, 2009. Mr. Li
is
the founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ACG and Kaiyuan Real Estate
Development Co., Ltd. which was previously the second largest shareholder of
Shijiazhuang International Building, a construction company traded on the
Shenzhen Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol CN: 000600. From February 2001
to May 2006, Mr. Li helped oversee Kaiyuan Real Estate Development Co., Ltd’s
development of the largest steel-framed construction in Hebei Province,
consisting of residential complexes, office towers and an upscale shopping mall,
which covered over one million square feet. In 1994, Mr. Li founded Shijiazhuang
Hi-tech Zone Kaiyuan Auto Trade Co., which was a pioneer in the commercial
vehicle leasing business in Hebei Province. He graduated from Tianjin University
in June 1985 with a bachelor degree in Optical Physics.
Chen
Lei
has served as AutoChina’s Senior Vice President since April 9,
2009. Mr. Lei has served as a Senior Vice President in charge of the finance
department and investor relations services for ACG since September 2008. From
January 1996 to September 2008, Mr. Lei served as a Senior Vice President in
charge of the finance department and investor relations services for Hebei
Kaiyuan Auto Trading Co., Ltd., a company affiliated with Yong Hui Li. Mr. Lei
received a Bachelor of Economics degree from Hebei Finance and Economics
University, China.
Johnson Shun-Pong
Lau
has served as AutoChina’s Chief Financial Officer since April 9,
2009. Mr. Lau has served as the Chief Financial Officer of ACG since October
2008. From March 2006 to October 2008, he was the Chief Financial Officer of
Haike Chemical Group Ltd., a petrochemical and specialty chemical company. Mr.
Lau served as the Chief Operating Officer of Kiwa Bio-Tech Products Group Corp.,
a company quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (KWBT) which engaged in
bio-technological products for agriculture products, from January 2005 to March
2006. Mr. Lau serves on the Board of Directors of Haike Chemical Group Ltd.,
which is a company public in the United Kingdom (AIM: HAIK). From May 1997 to
August 2004, Mr. Lau worked for Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu in Hong Kong and
Beijing. Mr. Lau received a Bachelor of Commerce degree from Monash
University.
Wei
Xing
has served as AutoChina’s Chief Operating Officer since April
9, 2009. Mr. Xing has served as Chief Operating Officer of ACG since September
2008. From January 1996 to September 2008, Mr. Xing served as Chief Operating
Officer for Hebei Kaiyuan Real Estate Development Co., Ltd., a company
affiliated with Yong Hui Li. Mr. Xing received a Bachelor of Engineering degree
from Hebei Building Engineering University and a Bachelor of Economics degree
from Hebei University.
Hui Kai Yan
has served as AutoChina’s Secretary and as a member of AutoChina’s Board
of Directors since April 9, 2009. Mr. Yan has been Senior Vice-President of ACG
and Kaiyuan Real Estate Development Corp. since August 1997. He is responsible
for Finance, Administration and Human Resources at each company. Prior to
joining Kaiyuan, from April 1994 to July 1997, Mr. Yan was a member of the
Economic and Trade Commission of Hebei provincial government and was responsible
for guiding state-owned enterprises through restructuring process and
modernization. From March 1989 to April 1994, he was at the Economic Commission
of Shijiazhuang city government (Shijiazhuang is the capital of Hebei province).
Mr. Yan is certified as a Senior Economist by Hebei provincial government. He
graduated from Hebei University of Technology in June 1985 with a bachelor
degree in Management Science.
James Cheng-Jee
Sha
has served as a member of AutoChina’s Board of Directors since its
inception. Mr. Sha served as Chairman of AutoChina’s Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer from its inception to April 9, 2009. Mr. Sha founded and
has been a partner of Spring Creek Investments since December 1999. Spring Creek
Investments is a private investment firm specializing in principal investments
and business consultations with internet and infrastructure companies. Mr. Sha
also has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Optoplex Corporation, a
communication networks company, since December 2002. From September 2005 to
February 2007, Mr. Sha served as Chief Executive Officer of AppStream, a
software application virtualization company. From February 1999 to September
1999, Mr. Sha served as the Chief Executive Officer for Sina.com (NASDAQ: SINA),
a global Chinese on-line media company and value added information service
provider. From July 1996 to August 1998, Mr. Sha served as the Chief Executive
Officer of Actra Business Systems, a joint venture between Netscape
Communications Corporation and GE Information Services (GEIS), providing
next-generation internet commerce application solutions for both
business-to-consumer and business-to-business commerce markets. From August 1994
to August 1998, Mr. Sha served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of
Netscape Communications Corporation, a computer services company until its
merger with AOL. From May 1990 to August 1994, Mr. Sha was a Vice President at
Oracle Corporation (NASDAQ:ORCL), a database management and development systems
software company. From June 1986 to May 1990, Mr. Sha was a Vice President at
Wyse Technology, Inc., a hardware, software and services computing company. Mr.
Sha currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Tom.com (HK:
8282), a wireless internet company in the PRC providing value-added multimedia
products and services. Mr. Sha also serves as a trustee of the University of
California at Berkeley Foundation and is a Board member of the Berkeley Chinese
Alumni International Association. Mr. Sha graduated from National Taiwan
University with a BS in Electrical Engineering, the University of California at
Berkeley with an MS in EECS and from Santa Clara University with an
MBA.
Diana Chia-Huei
Liu
has served as a member of AutoChina’s Board of Directors since
its inception. Ms. Liu served as President of AutoChina from its inception to
April 9, 2009. Ms. Liu has served as the President and Managing Director of
Cansbridge Capital, a private investment firm specializing in early stage
investments along the west coast of North America (namely U.S. and Canada) and
Asia, since August 1998. Prior to Cansbridge, Ms. Liu served as the Executive
Vice-President at Polaris Securities Group (TW: 6011), an investment firm in
Taiwan, where she founded and managed its North American operations from April
1994 to August 1998. From August 1991 to April 1994, Ms. Liu was an account
portfolio manager in global private banking at the Royal Bank of Canada
(NYSE:RY), a full-service banking firm. From October 1988 to August 1991, Ms.
Liu served as the regional sales manager for the province of British Columbia,
Canada, at CIBC Securities, a subsidiary of CIBC (NYSE:CM), a full- service
banking firm, where she founded and managed the mutual funds promotion division.
Ms. Liu has served since June 2006 as a member of the Executive Committee and
the Chair of the Investment Committee at the Asia Pacific Foundation, a Canadian
federal government created think tank and policy advisory board where she works
closely with the co-CEOs on operational issues and investment of its endowment
funds. In addition, she also currently serves as a director of the Vancouver Goh
Ballet Society and BaySpec, Inc., a supplier of optical components. Ms. Liu
graduated with a BA in economics from the University of British Columbia in
Canada. Ms. Liu is the spouse of Mr. William Yu, AutoChina’s prior Chief
Financial Officer.
Thomas Luen-Hung
Lau
has served as a member of AutoChina’s Board of Directors since April
9, 2009. He is the Managing Director and Executive Director of Lifestyle
International Holdings Limited (HK: 1212), a company listed on The Stock
Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “HK Stock Exchange”) involved in department
store business in Hong Kong and China. From 1985 to 2006, Mr. Lau was the
Chairman of Chinese Estates Holdings Limited (HK: 127) and Chi Cheung Investment
Company Limited (HK: 112), both companies listed on the HK Stock Exchange. Mr.
Lau was the co-founder of Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc in the U.S.A. Mr.
Lau obtained a Bachelor of Arts Degree from the University of Toronto and a
Master Degree of Business Administration from the University of
Windsor.
The term
of each director is until the next election of directors or their earlier
resignation or removal.
The terms of Yong Hui Li
as Chief Executive Officer, Chen Lei as Senior Vice President, Wei Xing as Chief
Operating Officer and Johnson Lau as Chief Financial Officer are until April 9,
2012, unless terminated or extended pursuant to such person’s employment
contract with AutoChina.
Pursuant
to the share exchange agreement entered into on February 4, 2009 and amended on
March 11, 2009, James Cheng-Jee Sha and Diana Chia-Huei Liu were nominated as
members of AutoChina’s Board of Directors by the SCAC Shareholders’
Representative (as defined in the share exchange agreement) and Yong Hui Li and
Hui Kai Yan were nominated as members of AutoChina’s Board of Directors by the
AutoChina Shareholders’ Representative (as defined in the share exchange
agreement). Thomas Luen-Hung Lau was nominated upon the mutual agreement of the
SCAC Shareholders’ Representative and the AutoChina Shareholders’
Representative, pursuant to the share exchange agreement.
None of
the officers or directors of AutoChina are related.
The
business address of each party described above is No.322, Zhongshan East Road,
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, People’s Republic of China.
B. Compensation
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During
the last fiscal year, no officer and employee of AutoChina, and no former
officer of AutoChina participated in deliberations of AutoChina’s Board of
Directors concerning executive officer compensation.
AutoChina
Director Compensation
To date,
AutoChina has not provided any compensation to any of its directors. AutoChina
is in the process of formulating policies that will determine compensation of
its directors, which it expects to include a per diem for each board meeting
attended, an annual fee, reimbursement of expenses incurred in attending
meetings and equity awards. The amounts of compensation, numbers of shares
subject to awards and other terms of director compensation have not been finally
determined.
However,
directors were reimbursed for all business-related expenses incurred while
helping AutoChina to identify potential target businesses and perform due
diligence on suitable business combinations.
Under
Yong Hui Li’s employment contract with AutoChina under which he serves as
AutoChina’s Chief Executive Officer, (i) if Mr. Li’s employment is terminated by
AutoChina without cause, he is entitled to receive 3 months' base salary
severance to the extent that he is not otherwise employed during the severance
period, and (ii) if Mr. Li terminates his employment for cause, he is entitled
to 1 month base salary severance to the extent he is not otherwise employed
during the severance period. Mr. Li also serves as a director of AutoChina. No
other director of AutoChina is entitled to receive any benefits from either
AutoChina, ACG or any of their subsidiaries upon termination of
employment.
AutoChina’s
Executive Officers and Employees
Executive
Officers
Since
AutoChina did not have an operating business prior to the acquisition on April
9, 2009, its officers did not receive any compensation for their service to
AutoChina; and, since it had no other employees, AutoChina did not have any
compensation policies, procedures, objectives or programs in place.
Upon
consummation of the acquisition of ACG, AutoChina entered into employment
agreements with certain of its executive officers. The following discussion
summarizes the material terms of employment agreements entered into between
AutoChina and its executive officers:
|
·
|
The
term of the employment agreements is from April 9, 2009 until April 9,
2012, 3 years from the date of the consummation of the acquisition, unless
earlier terminated as described
below;
|
|
·
|
Yong
Hui Li will receive US$1 per year as compensation for serving as Chief
Executive Officer, Johnson Lau will receive US$50,000 per year as
compensation for serving as Chief Financial Officer, Wei Xing will receive
US$60,000 per year as compensation for serving as Chief Operating Officer
and Chen Lei will receive US$50,000 per year as compensation for serving
as Senior Vice President. No executive officers is entitled to a bonus,
unless otherwise approved by the board of
directors;
|
|
·
|
The
employment agreements may be terminated by the company (i) upon
termination of the executive “for cause”, which is defined as (A) the
failure of the executive to properly carry out his duties after notice by
the company of the failure to do so and a reasonable opportunity for the
executive to correct the same within a reasonable period specified by the
company; (B) any breach by the executive of one or more provisions of any
written agreement with, or written policies of, the company or his
fiduciary duties to the company likely to cause material harm to the
company and its affiliates, at the company's reasonable discretion, or (C)
any theft, fraud, dishonesty or serious misconduct by the executive
involving his duties or the property, business, reputation or affairs of
the company and its affiliates, (ii) due to the executives death, (iii) in
the event the executive becomes eligible for the company’s long-term
disability benefits or if the executive is unable to carry out his
responsibilities as a result of a physical or mental impairment for more
that 90 consecutive days or for more than 120 days in any 12-month period,
subject to applicable laws, and (iv) without cause upon one month written
notice, in which case the executive will be entitled to 3 months base
salary severance to the extent the executive is not otherwise employed
during the severance period;
|
|
·
|
The
employment agreements may be terminated by the respective executives: (i)
for any reason or no reason at all upon 3 months’ advanced notice, or (ii)
for “good reason” upon notice of the reason within 3 months of the event
causing such reason and subject to a 20-day cure period for the
company. “Good reason” is defined as: a material reduction in
the executive's base salary, except for reductions that are comparable to
reductions generally applicable to similarly situated executives
of AutoChina if (i) such reduction is effected by the company
without the consent of the executive and (ii) such event occurs within 3
months after a change in control. If the agreement is
terminated by the executive for “good reason” then 1 month base salary
severance to the extent the executive is not otherwise employed during the
severance period;
|
|
·
|
Each
executive is subject to the non-compete, non-solicitation provisions of
the agreement for a term of one year following termination of the
employment agreement;
|
|
·
|
Except
for “prior inventions” (which is defined as all inventions, original works
of authorship, developments, improvements, and trade secrets which were
made by the executive prior to the executive's employment with the
company), all inventions and other intellectual property created by the
executive during the term of employment are the property of the company,
and the executive agrees to assist the company to secure such intellectual
property rights; and
|
|
·
|
The
employment agreements include other customary terms and conditions, and
are governed by the laws of Hong
Kong.
|
Other
Employees
AutoChina
will adopt appropriate compensation policies, procedures, objectives or programs
after AutoChina’s management team has had the opportunity to fully understand
the operations of the business. However, it is anticipated that the compensation
for senior executives of AutoChina will be comprised of four elements: a base
salary, an annual performance bonus, equity and benefits.
In
developing salary ranges, potential bonus payouts, equity awards and benefit
plans, it is anticipated that the Compensation Committee will take into account:
1) competitive compensation among comparable companies and for similar positions
in the market, 2) relevant ways to incentivize and reward senior management for
improving shareholder value while building AutoChina into a successful company,
3) individual performance, 4) how best to retain key executives, 5) the overall
performance of AutoChina and its various key component entities, 6) AutoChina’s
ability to pay and 7) other factors deemed to be relevant at the
time.
AutoChina
and ACG senior management have discussed AutoChina’s above mentioned planned
process for executive compensation after the acquisition is complete and the
four compensation components. Specific compensation plans for ACG’s key
executives will be negotiated and established by the Compensation Committee.
This will include, but may not be limited to, the four ACG executives who
currently have employment contracts (which will be modified, if necessary, to
reflect any additions to or changes in compensation).
ACG
Director and Executive Officer Compensation
Prior to
the acquisition on April 9, 2009, ACG did not have employment agreements with
any of its officers and directors.
The
following table shows information concerning the annual compensation for
services provided to ACG by its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial
Officer. No person made more than $100,000 in 2008.
Name and Principal Position
|
Year
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
|
Bonus ($)
|
|
|
All other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
Compensation
($)
|
|
Yong
Hui Li, Chief Executive Officer
|
2008
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Johnson
Lau, Chief Financial Officer (1)
|
2008
|
|
|
15,250
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
15,250
|
|
(1) Mr.
Lau joined ACG on October 16, 2008. Prior to that time, ACG did not have a Chief
Financial Officer.
AutoChina
International Limited 2009 Equity Incentive Plan
The
AutoChina International Limited 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (referred to below as
the “incentive plan”) was approved and took effect on April 8, 2009, upon the
approval by the shareholders of AutoChina International Limited.
Under the
terms of the incentive plan, 1,675,000 AutoChina ordinary shares are reserved
for issuance in accordance with its terms (provided, however, that dividend
equivalent rights are payable solely in cash and therefore do not reduce the
number of shares that may be granted under the incentive plan and that stock
appreciation rights only reduce the number of shares available for grant under
the plan by the number of shares actually received by the grantee). AutoChina
currently anticipates that it will grant awards to acquire up to
approximately 30,000 shares pursuant to the incentive plan to Johnson Lau,
AutoChina’s Chief Financial Officer. Any other awards under the plan will be
made by the Board of Directors.
Assuming
that the anticipated grants are made, there would be at least approximately
1,645,000 shares remaining for issuance in accordance with the incentive plan’s
terms. The purpose of the incentive plan is to assist AutoChina in attracting,
retaining and providing incentives to its employees, directors and consultants,
or the employees, directors and consultants of its affiliates, whose past,
present and/or potential future contributions to AutoChina have been, are or
will be important to the success of AutoChina and to align the interests of such
persons with AutoChina’s shareholders. It is also designed to motivate employees
and to significantly contribute toward growth and profitability, to provide
incentives to AutoChina’s directors, employees and consultants who, by their
position, ability and diligence are able to make important contributions to
AutoChina’s growth and profitability. The various types of incentive awards that
may be issued under the incentive plan will enable AutoChina to respond to
changes in compensation practices, tax laws, accounting regulations and the size
and diversity of its business.
All
directors, employees and consultants of the company are eligible to be granted
awards under the incentive plan. All awards will be subject to the approval of
AutoChina’s Board of Directors or its Compensation Committee.
Description
of the Incentive Plan
A summary
of the principal features of the incentive plan is provided below, but is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the incentive plan, a
copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.16 to this Annual Report.
Awards
The
incentive plan provides for the authority to grant any type of arrangement to a
qualified person, which involves shares, cash, options or stock appreciation
rights, or a similar right with a fixed or variable price related to the fair
market value of the ordinary shares and with an exercise or conversion privilege
related to the passage of time, the occurrence of one or more events, or the
satisfaction of performance criteria or other conditions. Such awards include,
without limitation, incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock
appreciation rights, sales or bonuses of restricted shares, restricted share
units or dividend equivalent rights, or any two or more of such awards in
combination, for an aggregate of not more than 1,675,000 of AutoChina’s ordinary
shares, to directors, employees and consultants of AutoChina or its affiliates.
If any award expires, is cancelled, or terminates unexercised or is forfeited,
the number of shares subject thereto, if any, is again available for grant under
the incentive plan. The number of ordinary shares with respect to which stock
options or stock appreciation rights may be granted to a grantee under the
incentive plan in any calendar year cannot exceed 500,000. The number of
ordinary shares with respect to which restricted shares or restricted share
units may be granted to a grantee under the incentive plan in any calendar year
cannot exceed 500,000.
There are
approximately 1,600 employees, directors and consultants who are eligible to
receive awards under the incentive plan. New directors, employees and
consultants are eligible to participate in the incentive plan as
well.
AutoChina
does not currently have any outstanding options or any intention, agreement or
obligation to issue any options outside the incentive plan.
Administration
of the Incentive Plan
The
incentive plan will be administered by either AutoChina’s Board of Directors or
a committee (referred to as the committee), if the Board of Directors delegates
the ability to administrate the plan. Among other things, the Board of Directors
or, if the Board of Directors delegates its authority to the committee, the
committee, has complete discretion, subject to the express limits of the
incentive plan, to determine the employees, directors and consultants to be
granted awards, the types of awards to be granted, the number of AutoChina
ordinary shares subject to each award, if any, the exercise price under each
option, the base price of each stock appreciation right, the term of each award,
the vesting schedule and/or performance goals for each award that utilizes such
a schedule or provide for performance goals, whether to accelerate vesting, the
value of the ordinary shares, and any required withholdings. The Board of
Directors or the committee may amend, modify or terminate any outstanding award,
provided that the grantee’s consent to such action is required if the action
would materially and adversely affect the grantee. The Board of Directors or the
committee is also authorized to construe the award agreements and may prescribe
rules relating to the incentive plan. The Board of Directors or committee may
reduce the exercise price of options or reduce the base appreciation amount of
any stock appreciation right without shareholder approval. Except as specified
below, no award that was intended to qualify as performance based compensation
may have an exercise or purchase price, if any, of less than 100% of the fair
market value of AutoChina’s ordinary shares.
Special
terms relating to Stock Options
The
incentive plan provides for the grant of stock options, which may be either
“incentive stock options” (ISOs), which are intended to meet the requirements
for special U.S. federal income tax treatment under the Code, or “nonqualified
stock options” (NQSOs). Options may be granted on such terms and conditions as
the Board of Directors or the committee may determine; provided, however, that
the exercise price of an option may not be less than 100% of the fair market
value of the underlying stock on the date of grant, and the term of an ISO may
not exceed ten years (110% of such value and five years in the case of an ISO
granted to an employee who owns (or is deemed to own) more than 10% of the total
combined voting power of all classes of capital stock of AutoChina or a parent
or subsidiary of AutoChina). ISOs may only be granted to employees. In addition,
the aggregate fair market value of ordinary shares underlying one or more ISOs
(determined at the time of grant) which are exercisable for the first time by
any one employee during any calendar year may not exceed $100,000. The Board of
Directors or the committee may permit a cashless “net exercise” of the options
(which is attached to the incentive plan attached hereto).
Additional
Terms
ISOs may
not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any
manner other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution and may be
exercised, during the lifetime of the grantee, only by the grantee. Other awards
are transferable (i) by will and by the laws of descent and distribution and
(ii) during the lifetime of the grantee: (a) to a Holding Company (as defined in
the incentive plan) of such grantee, or (B) to the extent and in the manner
authorized by the Board of Directors or the committee. No shares will be
delivered under the incentive plan to any grantee or other person until such
grantee or other person has made arrangements acceptable to the Board of
Directors or the committee for the satisfaction of any national, provincial or
local income and employment tax withholding obligations, including, without
limitation, obligations incident to the receipt of Shares. A grantee is not
considered a shareholder with respect to the shares underlying an award until
the shares are issued to the grantee.
Amendments
AutoChina’s
Board of Directors may at any time amend, alter, suspend or terminate the
incentive plan; provided, that no amendment requiring shareholder approval will
be effective unless such approval has been obtained, and provided further that
no amendment of the incentive plan or its termination may be effected if it
would materially and adversely affect the rights of a grantee without the
grantee’s consent.
Certain
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Incentive Plan
The
following is a general summary of the U.S. federal income tax consequences under
current tax law to AutoChina and to individual grantees in the incentive plan
who are individual citizens or residents of the United States of ISOs, NQSOs,
restricted stock awards, unrestricted stock awards, distribution equivalent
right awards and SARs granted pursuant to the incentive plan. It does not
purport to cover all of the special rules that may apply, including special
rules relating to limitations on the ability of AutoChina to deduct certain
compensation, special rules relating to deferred compensation, golden
parachutes, grantees subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act and the
exercise of an option with previously-acquired shares. In addition, this summary
does not address the state or local income or other tax consequences inherent in
the acquisition, ownership, vesting, exercise, termination or disposition of an
award under the incentive plan or AutoChina ordinary shares issued pursuant
thereto.
A grantee
generally does not recognize taxable income upon the grant of an NQSO or an ISO.
Upon the exercise of an NQSO, the grantee generally recognizes ordinary income
in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares
acquired on the date of exercise over the exercise price thereunder, and
AutoChina will generally be entitled to a deduction for such amount at that
time. If the grantee later sells shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an
NQSO, the grantee generally recognizes a long-term or a short-term capital gain
or loss, depending on the period for which the shares were held.
A
long-term capital gain is generally subject to more favorable tax treatment than
ordinary income or a short-term capital gain. The deductibility of capital
losses is subject to certain limitations. Upon the exercise of an ISO, the
grantee generally does not recognize taxable income. If the grantee disposes of
the shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an ISO more than two years after
the date of grant and more than one year after the transfer of the shares to the
grantee, the grantee generally recognizes a long-term capital gain or loss, and
AutoChina is not entitled to a deduction. However, if the grantee disposes of
such shares prior to the end of the required holding period, all or a portion of
the gain is treated as ordinary income, and AutoChina is generally entitled to
deduct such amount.
In
addition to the tax consequences described above, a grantee may be subject to
the alternative minimum tax, which is payable to the extent it exceeds the
grantee’s regular tax. For this purpose, upon the exercise of an ISO, the excess
of the fair market value of the shares over the exercise price thereunder is a
preference item for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. In addition, the
grantee’s basis in such shares is increased by such excess for purposes of
computing the gain or loss on the disposition of the shares for alternative
minimum tax purposes. If a grantee is required to pay an alternative minimum
tax, the amount of such tax which is attributable to deferral preferences
(including any ISO adjustment) generally may be allowed as a credit against the
grantee’s regular tax liability (and, in certain cases, may be refunded to the
grantee) in subsequent years. To the extent the credit is not used, it is
carried forward.
A grantee
who receives an unrestricted stock award recognizes ordinary compensation income
upon receipt of the award equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value
of the shares over any amount paid by the grantee for the shares, and AutoChina
is generally entitled to deduct such payment at such time.
A grantee
who receives a restricted stock award that is subject to a substantial risk of
forfeiture and certain transfer restrictions generally recognizes ordinary
compensation income at the time the restriction lapses in an amount equal to the
excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock at such time over any
amount paid by the grantee for the shares. Alternatively, the grantee may elect
to be taxed upon receipt of the restricted stock based on the value of the
shares at the time of grant. AutoChina is generally entitled to a deduction at
the same time as ordinary compensation income is required to be included by the
grantee and in the same amount. Dividends received with respect to such
restricted stock are generally treated as compensation, unless the grantee
elects to be taxed on the receipt (rather than the vestings) of the restricted
stock. Other restricted stock awards are taxed in the same manner as an
unrestricted stock award. A grantee generally does not recognize income upon the
grant of an SAR. The grantee has ordinary compensation income upon exercise of
the SAR equal to the increase in the value of the underlying shares, and
AutoChina will generally be entitled to a deduction for such amount. A grantee
generally does not recognize income for a dividend equivalent right award until
payments are received. At such time, the grantee recognizes ordinary
compensation income equal to the amount of any cash payments and the fair market
value of any AutoChina ordinary shares received, and AutoChina is generally
entitled to deduct such amount at such time.
Retirement
Benefits
As of
December 31, 2008, ACG’s subsidiaries in the PRC have participated the
government-mandated employee welfare and retirement benefit contribution and
provided pension, retirement or similar benefits to its employees. The PRC
regulations require ACG’s PRC subsidiaries to pay the local labor administration
bureau a monthly contribution at a stated contribution rate based on the monthly
basic compensation of qualified employees. The local labor
administration bureau, which manages various investment funds, will take care of
employee retirement, medical and other fringe benefits. ACG’s
subsidiaries have no further commitments beyond its monthly
contribution.
AutoChina
does not have employees and is not required to accrue pension, retirement or
similar benefits.
C. Board
Practices
Board
Committees
AutoChina’s
Board of Directors has an audit committee, governance and nominating committee,
and compensation committee, and has adopted a charter for each committee. Each
committee consists of Thomas Lau, James Sha and Diana Liu, each of whom is an
independent director. James Sha has been designated an “Audit Committee
Financial Expert” under SEC rules and the current listing standards of the
Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.
Audit
Committee
The audit
committee, consisting of Messrs. Sha and Lau and Ms. Liu, oversees our financial
reporting process on behalf of the board of directors. The audit committee was
established in May 2009. The committee’s responsibilities include the following
functions:
|
·
|
appoint
and replace the independent auditors to conduct the annual audit of our
books and records;
|
|
·
|
review
the proposed scope and results of the
audit;
|
|
·
|
review
and pre-approve the independent auditors’ audit and non-audited services
rendered;
|
|
·
|
approve
the audit fees to be paid;
|
|
·
|
review
accounting and financial controls with the independent auditors and our
internal auditors and financial and accounting
staff;
|
|
·
|
review
and approve related party
transactions;
|
|
·
|
meeting
separately and periodically with management and our internal auditor and
independent auditors.
|
Our board
of directors has determined that Mr. Sha, the Chair of the Audit Committee, is
an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC’s
rules.
Governance
and Nominating Committee
The
governance and nominating committee, consisting of Messrs. Sha and Lau and Ms.
Liu, is responsible for identifying potential candidates to serve on our board
and its committees. The governance and nominating committee was established in
May 2009. The committee’s responsibilities include the following
functions:
|
·
|
developing
the criteria and qualifications for membership on the
board;
|
|
·
|
recruiting,
reviewing and nominating candidates for election to the board or to fill
vacancies on the Board;
|
|
·
|
reviewing
candidates for election to the board proposed by shareholders, and
conducting appropriate inquiries into the background and qualifications of
any such candidates;
|
|
·
|
establishing
subcommittees for the purpose of evaluating special or unique
matters;
|
|
·
|
monitoring
and making recommendations regarding board committee functions,
contributions and composition; and
|
|
·
|
evaluating,
on an annual basis, the governance and nominating committee’s
performance.
|
The
governance and nominating committee will consider director candidates
recommended by shareholders. Shareholders who wish to recommend to the
governance and nominating committee a candidate for election to the board should
send their letters to AutoChina International Limited, No. 322 Zhongshan East
Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050011, People’s Republic of China,
Attention: Governance and Nominating Committee. The corporate secretary will
promptly forward all such letters to the members of the governance and
nominating committee. Shareholders must follow certain procedures to recommend
to the governance and nominating committee candidates for election as directors.
In general, in order to provide sufficient time to enable the governance and
nominating committee to evaluate candidates recommended by shareholders in
connection with selecting candidates for nomination in connection with
AutoChina’s annual meeting of shareholders, the corporate secretary must receive
the shareholder’s recommendation no later than thirty (30) days after the end of
AutoChina’s fiscal year. For a list of information required to be submitted with
a recommendation, please contact AutoChina’s secretary at the address listed
above.
Compensation
Committee
The
compensation committee, consisting of Messrs. Sha and Lau and Ms. Liu, is
responsible for making recommendations to the board concerning salaries and
incentive compensation for our officers and employees and administers our stock
option plans. The compensation committee was established in May
2009. Its responsibilities include the following
functions:
|
·
|
at
least annually review AutoChina’s corporate goals and objectives relevant
to the executives’ compensation; evaluate the executives’ performance in
light of such goals and objectives; and, either as a compensation
committee or, together with the other independent directors (as directed
by the board), determine and approve the executives’ compensation level
based on this evaluation. In determining the long-term
incentive component of the executives’ compensation, the compensation
committee will consider AutoChina’s performance, the value of similar
incentive awards to the executives at comparable companies, the awards
given to the executives in past years and any relevant legal requirements
and associated guidance of the applicable
law;
|
|
·
|
at
least annually review and make recommendations to the board with respect
to non-executive officer and independent director compensation to assist
the board in making the final determination as to non-executive officer
and independent director
compensation;
|
|
·
|
attempt
to ensure that AutoChina’s compensation program is effective in attracting
and retaining key employees, reinforce business strategies and objectives
for enhanced shareholder value, and administer the compensation program in
a fair and equitable manner consistent with established policies and
guidelines;
|
|
·
|
administer
AutoChina’s incentive-compensation plans and equity-based plans, insofar
as provided therein;
|
|
·
|
make
recommendations to the board regarding approval, disapproval,
modification, or termination of existing or proposed employee benefit
plans;
|
|
·
|
approve
any stock option award or any other type of award as may be required for
complying with any tax, securities, or other regulatory requirement, or
otherwise determined to be appropriate or desirable by the compensation
committee or board;
|
|
·
|
approve
the policy for authorizing claims for expenses from the
executives;
|
|
·
|
review
and assess the adequacy of this charter annually;
and
|
|
·
|
review
and approve the compensation disclosure and analysis prepared by
AutoChina’s management, as required to be included in AutoChina’s proxy
statement or annual report on Form 20-F, or equivalent, filed with the
SEC.
|
Compensation
Committee Interlocks And Insider Participation
No member
of our compensation committee has at any time been an officer or employee of
ours, or our subsidiaries. No interlocking relationship exists between our board
of directors or compensation committee and the board of directors or
compensation committee of any other company, nor has any interlocking
relationship existed in the past.
Director
Independence
AutoChina’s
Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Sha and Lau and Ms. Liu qualify
as independent directors under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market because they
do not currently own a large percentage of ACG's capital stock, are not
currently employed by ACG, have not been actively involved in the management of
ACG and do not fall into any of the enumerated categories of people who cannot
be considered independent in the Nasdaq Share Market Rules.
D. Employees
On
December 31, 2008, ACG’s subsidiaries had 1,565 employees, of which 238
employees are members of management (including managers at each
facility).
AutoChina
has no contracts or collective bargaining agreements with labor unions and has
never experienced work stoppages. AutoChina considers its relations with its
employees to be good.
E. Share
Ownership
See Item
7, below.
ITEM
7.
|
MAJOR
SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
A. Major
Shareholders
The
following table sets forth, as of May 26, 2009, certain information regarding
beneficial ownership of AutoChina’s ordinary shares by each person who is known
by AutoChina to beneficially own more than 5% of AutoChina’s ordinary shares.
The table also identifies the stock ownership of each of AutoChina’s directors,
each of AutoChina’s named executive officers, and all directors and officers as
a group. Except as otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed in the table
have sole voting and investment powers with respect to the shares indicated.
AutoChina’s major shareholders do not have different voting rights than any
other holder of AutoChina’s ordinary shares.
Ordinary
shares which an individual or group has a right to acquire within 60 days
pursuant to the exercise or conversion of options, warrants or other similar
convertible or derivative securities are deemed to be outstanding for the
purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such individual or group, but
are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership of any other person shown in the table.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
(1)
|
|
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
|
|
|
Approximate
Percentage of
Outstanding Ordinary
Shares (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Honest
Best Int'l Ltd.
|
|
|
8,606,250
|
|
|
|
80.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yong
Hui Li (3)
|
|
|
8,606,250
|
(3)
|
|
|
80.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
Cheng-Jee Sha
|
|
|
1,295,157
|
(4)
|
|
|
11.27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diana
Chia-Huei Liu
|
|
|
918,126
|
(5)
|
|
|
8.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chen
Lei
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Johnson
Lau
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wei
Xing
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hui
Kai Yan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
Luen-Hung Lau
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Victory
Park Capital Advisors, LLC (6)
|
|
|
548,800
|
|
|
|
5.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
directors and executive officers as a group (eight
individuals)
|
|
|
10,819,533
|
|
|
|
90.19
|
%
|
(1)
Unless indicated otherwise, the business address of each of the individuals is
No.322, Zhongshan East Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, People’s Republic of
China.
(2) Based
on 10,716,720 ordinary shares of AutoChina issued and outstanding as of the date
of this prospectus.
(3)
Consists of 8,606,250 ordinary shares of AutoChina owned by Honest Best Int’l
Ltd., whose sole shareholder is Yan Wang, Mr. Li’s wife.
(4)
Consists of 515,157 ordinary shares of AutoChina and 780,000 ordinary shares of
AutoChina issuable upon the exercise of warrants, which became exercisable on
April 9, 2009 for $5.00 per share and which expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City
time on February 27, 2013.
(5)
Consists of (i) 209,063 ordinary shares of AutoChina and 250,000 ordinary shares
of AutoChina issuable upon the exercise of warrants, and (ii) 209,063 ordinary
shares of AutoChina owned by Diana Chia-Huei Liu, William Tsu-Cheng Yu’s wife,
and 250,000 ordinary shares of AutoChina issuable upon the exercise of warrants
owned by William Tsu-Cheng Yu, Diana Chia-Huei Liu’s husband. The warrants
became exercisable on April 9, 2009 for $5.00 per share and which expire at 5:00
p.m., New York City time on February 27, 2013.
(6) Based
on a Schedule 13D filed by: (i) Victory Park Capital Advisors, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (“Capital Advisors”); (ii) Victory Park
Credit Opportunities Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (
“Credit Opportunities Fund”); (iii) Victory Park Special Situations Master
Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company ( “Special Situations Fund”, and,
together with Credit Opportunities Fund, the “Funds”); (iv) Jacob Capital,
L.L.C., an Illinois limited liability company (“Jacob Capital”); and
(v) Richard Levy, a citizen of the United States of America. The business
address for each such entity, other than the Funds, is 227 West Monroe Street,
Suite 3900, Chicago, Illinois 60606. The business address for the Funds is
c/o Walkers SPV Limited, Walker House, 87 Mary Street, George Town, Grand
Cayman, KY1 9002 Cayman Islands. Capital Advisors, as the investment manager of
the Funds, may be deemed to have the shared power to vote or direct the vote of
(and the shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of) the ordinary
shares. As the manager of Capital Advisors, Jacob Capital may be deemed to have
the shared power to vote or direct the vote of (and the shared power to dispose
or direct the disposition of) the ordinary shares. By virtue of Richard Levy’s
position as sole member of Jacob Capital, Richard Levy may be deemed to have the
shared power to vote or direct the vote of (and the shared power to dispose or
direct the disposition of) the ordinary shares, and, therefore, Richard Levy may
be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the ordinary shares. Capital Advisors,
Jacob Capital and Richard Levy disclaim beneficial ownership of the reported
securities except to the extent of their pecuniary interest
therein.
B. Related
Party Transactions
AutoChina
In
October 2007, AutoChina issued 1,293,750 ordinary shares to the individuals set
forth below for $25,000 in cash, at a purchase price of approximately $0.02 per
share, as follows:
Shareholder
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
James
Cheng-Jee Sha
|
|
|
646,875
|
|
Diana
Chia-Huei Liu
|
|
|
258,750
|
|
William
Tsu-Cheng Yu
|
|
|
258,750
|
|
Jimmy
(Jim) Yee-Ming Wu
|
|
|
90,563
|
|
Gary
Han Ming Chang
|
|
|
38,812
|
|
Such
shares were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as they were sold to sophisticated, wealthy
individuals. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid with respect to
such sales.
On May 4,
2009, pursuant to the terms of a share escrow agreement dated February 27, 2008
between AutoChina, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the founding
shareholders, the founding shareholders forfeited and AutoChina cancelled an
aggregate of 263,463 ordinary shares of AutoChina as a result of more than 20%
of public shareholders of AutoChina voting against the acquisition of ACG by
AutoChina and exercising their conversion rights, as described further in the
share escrow agreement.
On
October 24, 2007, James Sha, Diana Liu and William Wu loaned AutoChina an
aggregate of $100,000 to cover expenses related to AutoChina’s initial public
offering. The loans were repaid without interest on March 4, 2007 from a portion
of the proceeds of AutoChina’s initial public offering and the private placement
of the insider warrants not placed in trust.
On
February 27, 2008, AutoChina completed a private placement of 1,430,000 warrants
to its founding shareholders and received net proceeds of $1,430,000. AutoChina
refers to the warrants sold in this private placement as the insider warrants.
The insider warrants are identical to the warrants underlying the units sold in
the initial public offering except that if AutoChina calls the warrants for
redemption, the insider warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis so long as
such warrants are held by AutoChina’s founding shareholders or their affiliates.
The securities were sold in reliance on the exemption from registration
contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act since they were sold to
sophisticated, wealthy individuals. No underwriting discounts or commissions
were paid with respect to such securities.
On
February 27, 2008, AutoChina sold options to purchase up to an aggregate of
450,000 units to the underwriter (and certain of its affiliates) in AutoChina’s
initial public offering for an aggregate of $100. The exercise price per unit is
$8.80, and each unit consists of one ordinary share and a warrant to purchase
one ordinary share, exercisable at $5.00 per share. The securities were sold in
reliance on the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act since they were sold to the underwriters in AutoChina’s initial
public offering. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid with respect
to such securities.
Commencing
on February 27, 2008 through AutoChina’s acquisition of ACG on April 9, 2009,
AutoChina paid Live ABC Interactive Co., Ltd. Beijing, an affiliate of James
Sha, a fee of $7,500 per month for providing AutoChina with office space and
certain office and secretarial services. However, this arrangement was solely
for AutoChina’s benefit and was not intended to provide AutoChina’s officers and
directors compensation in lieu of a salary.
AutoChina
reimbursed its founding shareholders, officers, directors, special advisors or
their affiliates for any reasonable out-of-pocket business expenses incurred by
them in connection with certain activities on its behalf such as identifying and
investigating possible target businesses and business combinations. There was no
limit on the amount of out-of-pocket expenses reimbursable by AutoChina, which
will be reviewed only by its board or a court of competent jurisdiction if such
reimbursement is challenged. To the extent that such expenses exceeded the
available proceeds not deposited in the trust account and interest income that
was released to AutoChina from the trust account, such out-of-pocket expenses
are a liability of the post-combination business and will treated in a manner
similar to any other account payable of AutoChina. AutoChina’s officers and
directors may, as part of any such combination, negotiate the repayment of some
or all of any such expenses.
Other
than the $7,500 per-month administrative fee payable to Live ABC Interactive
Co., Ltd and reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses payable to AutoChina’s officers
and directors, no compensation or fees of any kind, including finders fees,
consulting fees or other similar compensation, was paid to any of AutoChina’s
founding shareholders, officers, directors or special advisors who owned
AutoChina’s ordinary shares prior to this offering, or to any of their
respective affiliates, prior to or with respect to the business
combination.
ACG
During
the years presented, ACG had borrowed from various companies affiliated with Mr.
Yong Hui Li, ACG’s Chairman and CEO, and certain affiliates of Mr. Yong Hui Li
including certain companies controlled by ACG’s ultimate shareholder prior to
AutoChina’s acquisition of ACG, Ms. Yan Wang. Each of these loans is
non-interest bearing and was entered into to satisfy the ACG’s short term
capital needs. In addition, the payable balances of each loan are unsecured and
due on demand by the lender. The outstanding amounts due to related parties as
of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
$
in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due
to affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Yong Hui Li
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
$
|
5,125
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Hebei
Shengrong Auto parts Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
Hebei
Kaiyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
Shijiazhuang
Yiyuan Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Baoding
Tianfu Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Beijing
Tonghe Shengyuan Trade Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,894
|
|
|
$
|
2,075
|
|
|
$
|
1,674
|
|
Notes:
(1)
Companies controlled by ACG’s ultimate shareholder prior to AutoChina’s
acquisition of ACG, Ms. Yan Wang.
(2)
Companies that were formerly owned by ACG.
(3) ACG’s
chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and the ultimate shareholder of Hebei
Kaiyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd.
During
the years presented, ACG has paid certain operating expenses on behalf of
various companies affiliated with Mr. Yong Hui Li, including certain companies
controlled by ACG’s ultimate shareholder prior to AutoChina’s acquisition of
ACG, Ms. Yan Wang (Mr. Yong Hui Li’s wife), and companies which are formally
controlled by ACG. ACG has advanced these funds, to each of these companies on a
non-interest bearing and unsecured basis, and such funds are due on demand by
ACG. The outstanding amounts due from related parties as of December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
$
in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due
from affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shijiazhuang
Zhicheng Property Management Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,634
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Kinbow
Capital & Holding Group Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
Beijing
Qianbo Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
Beijing
Tonghe Shengyuan Business & Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Hebei
Kaiyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,164
|
|
Hebei
Beiguo Kaiyuan Shopping Mall Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
Shijiazhuang
Yiyuan Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Baoding
Tianfu Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,487
|
|
|
$
|
5,641
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
$
in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due
from unconsolidated subsidiary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cangzhou
Hengyuan Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
$
|
529
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
(1)
Companies controlled by ACG’s ultimate shareholder prior to AutoChina’s
acquisition of ACG, Ms. Yan Wang.
(2)
Companies that were formerly owned by ACG.
As of May
15, 2009, there is nil outstanding due from affiliates under these related party
loans. All of the outstanding balances on these loans were repaid upon the
consummation of the acquisition.
During
the period presented, ACG sold and purchased automobiles and spare parts to and
from its affiliates. The details of the related party transactions were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
Parties Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hebei
Kaiyuan Doors & Windows Manufacturing Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(a)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8,649
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Shijiazhuang
Zhicheng Property Management Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(b)
|
|
|
3,937
|
|
|
|
2,529
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Shijiazhuang
Zhicheng Property Management Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(a)
|
|
|
3,911
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Hebei
Beiguo Kaiyuan Shopping Mall Co., Ltd
|
|
(2)
(b)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,058
|
|
|
|
10,577
|
|
Hebei
Kaiyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(a)
|
|
|
39,553
|
|
|
|
1,958
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Hebei
Kaiyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(b)
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,853
|
|
Hebei
Kaiyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(e)
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
Kinbow
Capital & Holding Group Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(b)
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
Beijing
Tonghe Shenyuan Business & Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(a)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
Beijing
Tonghe Shenyuan Business & Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(1) (b)
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Beijing
Qianbo Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(b)
|
|
|
3,009
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
Beijing
Qianbo Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(c)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Beijing
Qianbo Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(d)
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Beijing
Qianbo Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(e)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Baoding
Tianfu Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(2)
(b)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Baoding
Tianfu Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(2)
(c)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Baoding
Tianfu Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(2)
(d)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Shijiazhuang
Yiyuan Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(2)
(a)
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Shijiazhuang
Yiyuan Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(2)
(b)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Beijing
Kinbow Sunshine Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(a)
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Beijing
Kinbow Sunshine Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(d)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Hebei
Xinchang Shengyuan Auto Sales Co., Ltd
|
|
(2)
(b)
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cangzhou
Hengyuan Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(2)
(b)
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cangzhou
Hengyuan Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(2)
(c)
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cangzhou
Hengyuan Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(2)
(d)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Hebei
Xuwei Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(a)
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Hebei
Xuwei Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(1)
(b)
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Hebei
Shengrong Auto parts Co., Ltd
|
|
(2)
(b)
|
|
|
12,369
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Hebei
Guangdehang Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(2)
(c)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Hebei
Guangdehang Auto Trading Co., Ltd
|
|
(2)
(d)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Notes:
(1)
Companies controlled by ACG’s ultimate shareholder prior to AutoChina’s
acquisition of ACG, Ms. Yan Wang.
(2)
Companies that are formerly owned by ACG.
Nature of
transaction:
(a) Loan
to ACG during the period. The amounts were interest-free, unsecured and
repayable on demand.
(b)
Short-term advance from ACG. The amounts were interest-free, unsecured and
payable on demand.
(c) Sale
of automobiles to ACG during the period.
(d)
Purchase of automobiles from ACG during the period.
(e) Sales
of investments in subsidiary / affiliates during the period.
Mr. Li,
ACG's Chairman and CEO, is the indirect beneficial owner of approximately 15.28%
of Beiguo Commercial Building Limited. Commencing in September 2008, Beiguo
began to provide short term financing for ACG's commercial vehicle sales and
leasing business. ACG pays a financing charge of approximately 4% per annum
premium to Beiguo for the funds obtained due to this financing arrangement, in
part, because the financing is guaranteed by Mr. Li, who has a long term
business relationship with Beiguo, on behalf of ACG.
C. Interests
of experts and counsel.
Not
applicable.
ITEM
8.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
A. Consolidated
Statements and Other Financial Information.
Please
see “Item 18. Financial Statements” for a list of the financial statements filed
as part of this annual report.
B. Significant
Changes
Not
applicable.
ITEM
9.
|
THE
OFFER AND LISTING
|
A. Offer
and Listing Details
The table
below sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low bid
prices for AutoChina’s units for the period from February 28, 2008 through May
31, 2009 and AutoChina’s ordinary shares and warrants for the period from March
28, 2008 through May 31, 2009. The OTC Bulletin Board quotations reflect
inter-dealer prices, are without retail markup, markdowns or commissions, and
may not represent actual transactions.
|
|
Ordinary
shares
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
Annual Highs and Lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
7.30
|
|
|
$
|
6.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
8.15
|
|
|
$
|
6.75
|
|
2009
|
|
|
14.00
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
|
|
6.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Highs and Lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
$
|
7.30
|
|
|
$
|
7.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
8.15
|
|
|
$
|
7.92
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
|
7.30
|
|
|
|
7.15
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
7.99
|
|
|
|
7.76
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
|
7.18
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
0.73
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
7.90
|
|
|
|
7.50
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
|
7.15
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
7.35
|
|
|
|
6.75
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
6.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
12.00
|
|
|
$
|
6.85
|
|
Second
Quarter (through May 26)
|
|
|
14.00
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly Highs and Lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November
2008
|
|
$
|
6.87
|
|
|
$
|
6.55
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
7.25
|
|
|
$
|
6.90
|
|
December
2008
|
|
|
6.60
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
6.75
|
|
January
2009
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
6.60
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
6.95
|
|
|
|
6.85
|
|
February
2009
|
|
|
7.80
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
|
|
6.95
|
|
March
2009
|
|
|
7.87
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
7.50
|
|
April
2009
|
|
|
14.00
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
May
2009
|
|
|
7.39
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
B. Plan
of Distribution
Not
required.
C. Markets
AutoChina’s
ordinary shares, warrants and units are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under
the symbols SCRQF, SCRWF and SCRUF, respectively. The units have been quoted on
the Bulletin Board since February 28, 2008 and the ordinary shares and warrants
since March 28, 2008. AutoChina’s securities did not trade on any market or
exchange prior to February 28, 2008.
D. Selling
Shareholders
Not
required.
E. Dilution
Not
required.
F. Expenses
of the Issue
Not
required.
ITEM
10.
|
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
|
A. Share
Capital
Not
required.
B. Memorandum
and Articles of Association
The
following represents a summary of certain key provisions of our second amended
and restated memorandum and articles of association. The summary does not
purport to be a summary of all of the provisions of our memorandum and articles
of all relevant provisions of Cayman Islands law governing the management and
regulation of Cayman Islands exempted companies.
Amendment
to Memorandum and Articles of Association
On April
9, 2009, we filed our Second Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of
Association that, among other things, changed our name to “AutoChina
International Limited” and removed certain provisions that, giving effect to
AutoChina’s acquisition of ACG, were no longer applicable.
Below is
a brief description of the amendments to the Amended and Restated Memorandum and
Articles of Association (which does not include a discussion of non-substantive
revisions or the correction of typographical errors):
·
|
An
amendment to the definition of “Auditor” to require the combined company
to hire an auditor registered with the public company oversight accounting
board, and deleting language relating to the combined company hiring “an
internationally recognized firm.”
|
·
|
The
definitions “Exchange Act”, “FINRA”, “NASD Rules” and “SEC” were
deleted.
|
·
|
The
definition “Share Exchange Agreement” was
added.
|
·
|
The
number of votes required to pass a special resolution was increased to 2/3
of votes cast from a majority of the votes
cast.
|
·
|
Section
3.2 (formerly Section 3(2)) was revised to clarify that the Board of
Directors of the combined company would have the ability to repurchase
securities of the combined company.
|
·
|
The
Divisions entitled “Liens” (pursuant to which AutoChina had a lien on its
outstanding shares), “Calls on Shares” (pursuant to which AutoChina could
call unpaid amounts on its shares) “Forfeiture of Shares” (which related
to shareholders forfeiting their shares in the event that shareholders
were unable to pay amounts due on such shares), and “Transfer of Shares”
(which related to required procedures in the event of a transfer of
shares), were deleted.
|
·
|
Section
44 was revised to remove the provision relating to third parties being
able to inspect the register of members for a
fee.
|
·
|
Sections
53 and 54, which related to certain procedures that were required to be
followed in the event of the death or disability of a stockholder were
deleted.
|
·
|
Section
61.2 (formerly section 61(2)) was revised to provide that at a general
meeting of the combined company a quorum would consist of one-third of the
shares outstanding. Previously, the section also required that
at least two shareholders be present at the
meeting.
|
·
|
Sections
66 and 67 were revised to require a poll vote, as opposed to permitting a
vote by show of hands.
|
·
|
Sections
67 and 70 were deleted because they related to demands for poll votes,
which would no longer be required since all votes would be done by
poll.
|
·
|
Section
85 was revised to prohibit shareholders from taking action by written
consent.
|
·
|
Section
86.1 (formerly Section 86(1)) was revised to provide that prior to
December 31, 2011, the Board of Directors would consist of not fewer than
2 persons and nor more than seven persons (unless otherwise determined by
the company at a general meeting).
|
·
|
Section
86.2 (formerly Section 86(2)) was revised to provide that prior to
December 31, 2011, the Board of Directors would consist of two persons
nominated by the AutoChina shareholders representative named in the share
exchange agreement (currently Yan Wang) two persons nominated by the
AutoChina shareholders representative (currently James Sha) and three
independent directors mutually agreed to by each of the shareholder
representatives.
|
·
|
Section
86(7) which did not permit the number of members of the Board of Directors
to be less than two, was deleted.
|
·
|
Section
96 was revised to provide that compensation for service on the Board of
Directors would be determined by the Board of Directors (as opposed to
being determined at a general meeting of
shareholders).
|
·
|
Section
105 was added, which provides that at least six members (or the entire
Board if there are less than six members) of the Board of Directors must
vote in favor of the following items for such items to be deemed to be
approved by the Board of Directors:
|
o
|
The
issuance of securities other than pursuant to the equity incentive plan or
outstanding convertible securities;
|
o
|
The
payment of any dividends or
distributions;
|
o
|
A
merger or consolidation where the shareholders of the combined company do
not hold a majority of the shares post
transaction;
|
o
|
The
sale or encumbrance of or on all or substantially all the assets of the
combined company or the purchase of all or substantially all the assets of
a third party by the combined company (except for transactions for an
amount les than that specified by the Board of Directors in its annual
business plan);
|
o
|
The
formation of a partnership, joint venture or subsidiary with a capital
commitment of greater than RMB5,000,000 (except for transactions for an
amount les than that specified by the Board of Directors in its annual
business plan).
|
o
|
The
reduction of the authorized
capital.
|
o
|
Any
recapitalization, reclassification, reorganization, split-off, spin-off,
or bankruptcy filing with respect to the combined
company.
|
o
|
The
approval or amendment of the annual budget, business plan or operating
plan of the combined company.
|
o
|
The
incurrence of indebtedness of greater than RMB5,000,000 unless such
liability is incurred pursuant to the then current business
plan.
|
o
|
A
change in the size or composition of the Board of
Directors.
|
o
|
Any
material amendment to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement,
Registration Rights Agreement (as defined in the Share Exchange Agreement)
and any executive employment agreement or indemnification
agreement.
|
o
|
Any
amendment to the Corporate Governance Rules (as defined in Section
125).
|
·
|
Section
124 was added and provides for the formation of an audit, nominating and
compensation committee.
|
·
|
Section
125 was added and provides that the combined company and each director is
required to comply with applicable policies and procedures of the combined
company.
|
·
|
Section
133.1 (formerly Section 133(1)) was revised to provide that any officer
(not just a directors and the Secretary, or two directors, or any person
appointed by the directors) could sign a document bearing the corporate
seal.
|
·
|
Sections
135.1 and 135.2 were added, which provide for procedures on the
destruction of documents.
|
·
|
Section
157 was revised to provide that auditor compensation would be determined
by the Board of Directors.
|
·
|
Section
165 and the Division entitled “Business Combination” were deleted in their
entirety as they were sections relating to the operation of AutoChina
prior to a business combination, which includes the provisions related to
a classified Board of
Directors.
|
Objects
of AutoChina
Under
AutoChina’s Second Amended and Restated Memorandum of Association, the objects
for which AutoChina is established are unlimited.
Directors
Directors
materially interested in a proposal, arrangement or contract may be counted in
determining the presence of a quorum and may vote at a meeting of the Board of
Directors of AutoChina, so long as (i) the material facts as to the director’s
interest are disclosed to the Board of Directors, and the Board authorizes the
transaction in good faith by the affirmative votes of a majority of the
disinterested directors, even though the disinterested directors be less than a
quorum; or (ii) the transaction is fair to the Company as of the time it is
authorized, approved or ratified.
Subject
to certain restrictions further described in AutoChina’s Second Amended and
Restated Articles of Association, the Board of Directors may exercise all the
powers of AutoChina to raise or borrow money and to mortgage or charge all or
any part of the undertaking, property and assets (present and future) and
uncalled capital of AutoChina and, subject to the law, to issue debentures,
bonds and other securities, whether outright or as collateral security for any
debt, liability or obligation of AutoChina or of any third party.
There are
no age restrictions on AutoChina’s directors. No director is required to hold
any shares in AutoChina by way of qualification.
Shareholder
Rights
Any class
of shares of AutoChina may, unless otherwise provided by the terms of issue of
the shares of that class, be varied, modified or abrogated with the sanction of
a special resolution passed at a separate general meeting of the holders of the
shares of that class.
Annual
General Meetings and Extraordinary General Meetings
An annual
general meeting and any extraordinary general meeting may be called by not less
than ten (10) clear days notice, but a general meeting may be called by shorter
notice, subject to the law, if it is so agreed (i) in the case of an annual
general meeting, by all members entitled to attend and vote thereat; and (ii) in
the case of any other meeting, by a majority in the number of the members having
the right to attend and vote at the meeting, being a majority together holding
not less than ninety-five percent (95%) in nominal value of the issued shares
giving that right.
C. Material
Contracts
As of
December 31, 2008, the Company has not entered into any material
contracts.
D. Exchange
Controls and Other Limitations Affecting Security Holders
Under
Cayman Islands law, there are currently no restrictions on the export or import
of capital, including foreign exchange controls or restrictions that affect the
remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to nonresident holders of
our shares.
E. Taxation
The
following summary of the material Cayman Islands and United States federal
income tax consequences of an investment in ordinary shares is based upon laws
and relevant interpretations thereof in effect as of the date of this Form 20-F,
all of which are subject to change. This summary does not deal with all possible
tax consequences relating to an investment in our ordinary shares, such as the
tax consequences under state, local and other tax laws.
Cayman
Islands Taxation
The
Government of the Cayman Islands will not, under existing legislation, impose
any income, corporate or capital gains tax, estate duty, inheritance tax, gift
tax or withholding tax upon the company or its shareholders. The Cayman Islands
are not party to any double taxation treaties.
No Cayman
Islands stamp duty will be payable by you in respect of the issue or transfer of
ordinary shares. However, an instrument transferring title to an ordinary share,
if brought to or executed in the Cayman Islands, would be subject to Cayman
Islands stamp duty.
We have
applied for and can expect to receive an undertaking from the
Governor-in-Cabinet of the Cayman Islands that, in accordance with section 6 of
the Tax Concessions Law (1999 Revision) of the Cayman Islands, for a period of
20 years from the date of the undertaking, no law which is enacted in the Cayman
Islands imposing any tax to be levied on profits, income, gains or appreciations
shall apply to us or our operations and, in addition, that no tax to be levied
on profits, income, gains or appreciations or which is in the nature of estate
duty or inheritance tax shall be payable (i) on the shares, debentures or other
obligations of AutoChina or (ii) by way of the withholding in whole or in
part of a payment of dividend or other distribution of income or capital by
AutoChina to its members or a payment of principal or interest or other sums due
under a debenture or other obligation of AutoChina.
United
States Federal Income Taxation
General
The
following is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of
owning and disposing of our ordinary shares
and
warrants, sometimes referred to as AutoChina securities, to AutoChina and to
holders of AutoChina securities. Because the components of a unit are separable
at the option of the holder, the holder of a unit should be treated, for U.S.
federal income tax purposes, as the owner of the underlying ordinary share and
warrant components of the unit, as the case may be. As a result, the discussion
below of the U.S. federal income tax consequences with respect to actual holders
of ordinary shares and warrants should also apply to the holder of a unit (as
the deemed owner of the underlying ordinary share and warrant components of the
unit)
. The discussion below of the U.S. federal income tax consequences
to “U.S. Holders” will apply to a beneficial owner of ordinary shares or
warrants that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
·
|
an
individual citizen or resident of the United
States;
|
|
·
|
a
corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal
income tax purposes) that is created or organized (or treated as created
or organized) in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof
or the District of Columbia;
|
|
·
|
an
estate whose income is includible in gross income for U.S. federal income
tax purposes regardless of its source;
or
|
|
·
|
a
trust if (i) a U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over the
trust’s administration and one or more U.S. persons are authorized to
control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (ii) it has a valid
election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be
treated as a U.S. person.
|
If a
beneficial owner of our ordinary shares and warrants is not described as a
U.S. Holder and is not an entity treated as a partnership or other pass- through
entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes, such owner will be considered a
“Non-U.S. Holder.” The U.S. federal income tax consequences applicable
specifically to Non-U.S. Holders is described below under the heading “Non-U.S.
Holders.”
This
summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”)
its legislative history, existing and proposed Treasury regulations promulgated
thereunder, published rulings and court decisions, all as currently in effect.
These authorities are subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly
on a retroactive basis.
This
discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may
be relevant to AutoChina or to any particular holder based on such holder’s
individual circumstances. In particular, this discussion considers only holders
that own our ordinary shares and warrants as capital assets within the meaning
of Section 1221 of the Code, and does not address the potential application of
the alternative minimum tax or the U.S. federal income tax consequences to
holders that are subject to special rules, including:
|
·
|
financial
institutions or financial services
entities;
|
|
·
|
taxpayers
who have elected mark-to-market
accounting;
|
|
·
|
governments
or agencies or instrumentalities
thereof;
|
|
·
|
regulated
investment companies;
|
|
·
|
real
estate investment trusts;
|
|
·
|
certain
expatriates or former long-term residents of the United
States;
|
|
·
|
persons
that actually or constructively own 5% or more of our voting
shares;
|
|
·
|
persons
that acquired our ordinary shares pursuant to an exercise of employee
stock options, in connection with employee stock incentive plans or
otherwise as compensation;
|
|
·
|
persons
that hold our ordinary shares or warrants as part of a straddle,
constructive sale, hedging, conversion or other integrated transaction;
or
|
|
·
|
persons
whose functional currency is not the U.S.
dollar.
|
This
discussion does not address any aspect of U.S. federal non-income tax laws, such
as gift or estate tax laws, or state, local or non-U.S. tax laws. Additionally,
the discussion does not consider the tax treatment of partnerships or other
pass-through entities or persons who hold our ordinary shares or warrants
through such entities. If a partnership (or other entity classified as a
partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is the beneficial owner of our
ordinary shares or warrants, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner
in the partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership.
We have
not sought, and will not seek, a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service
(“IRS”) or an opinion of counsel as to any U.S. federal income tax consequence
described herein. The IRS may disagree with the description herein, and its
determination may be upheld by a court. Moreover, there can be no assurance that
future legislation, regulations, administrative rulings or court decisions will
not adversely affect the accuracy of the statements in this
discussion.
BECAUSE
OF THE COMPLEXITY OF THE TAX LAWS AND BECAUSE THE TAX CONSEQUENCES TO
AUTOCHINA OR TO ANY PARTICULAR HOLDER OF AUTOCHINA SECURITIES MAY BE
AFFECTED BY MATTERS NOT DISCUSSED HEREIN, EACH HOLDER OF AUTOCHINA SECURITIES IS
URGED TO CONSULT WITH ITS TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE SPECIFIC TAX
CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACQUISITION AND THE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR
ORDINARY SHARES AND WARRANTS, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT OF STATE,
LOCAL AND NON-U.S. TAX LAWS, AS WELL AS U.S. FEDERAL TAX LAWS.
Tax
Consequences to U.S. Holders of Ordinary Shares and Warrants of
AutoChina
Taxation
of Distributions Paid on Ordinary Shares
Subject
to the passive foreign investment company, or “PFIC”, rules discussed below, a
U.S. Holder will be required to include in gross income as ordinary income the
amount of any dividend paid on our ordinary shares. A distribution on our
ordinary shares will be treated as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax
purposes to the extent the distribution is paid out of our current or
accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax
purposes). Such dividend will not be eligible for the dividends-received
deduction generally allowed to U.S. corporations in respect of dividends
received from other U.S. corporations. Distributions in excess of such earnings
and profits will be applied against and reduce the U.S. Holder’s basis in its
ordinary shares and, to the extent in excess of such basis, will be treated as
gain from the sale or exchange of such ordinary shares.
With
respect to non-corporate U.S. Holders for taxable years beginning before January
1, 2011, dividends may be taxed at the lower applicable long term capital gains
rate (see “— Taxation on the Disposition of Ordinary Shares and Warrants” below)
provided that (1) our ordinary shares are readily tradable on an established
securities market in the United States, (2) we are not a PFIC, as discussed
below, for either the taxable year in which the dividend was paid or the
preceding taxable year, and (3) certain holding period requirements are met.
It
is not entirely clear, however, whether a U.S. Holder’s holding period for our
ordinary shares would be suspended for purposes of clause (3) above for the
period that such holder had a right to have such ordinary shares redeemed by us.
In addition, under
recently published IRS authority, ordinary shares are
considered for purposes of clause (1) above to be readily tradable on an
established securities market in the United States only if they are listed on
certain exchanges, which presently do not include the OTC Bulletin
Board. Because our ordinary shares are listed and traded only
on the OTC Bulletin Board, any dividends paid on our ordinary shares
currently are not expected to qualify for the lower rate. U.S. Holders should
consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of the lower rate for
any dividends paid with respect to our ordinary shares.
If PRC
taxes apply to dividends paid to a U.S. Holder on our ordinary shares, such
taxes may be treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit against such holder’s
U.S. federal income tax liability (subject to certain limitations), and a U.S.
Holder may be entitled to certain benefits under the income tax treaty
between the United States and the PRC. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax
advisors regarding the creditability of any such PRC tax and their eligibility
for the benefits of the income tax treaty between the United States and the
PRC.
Taxation
on the Disposition of Ordinary Shares and Warrants
Upon a
sale or other taxable disposition of our ordinary shares or warrants, and
subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, a U.S. Holder generally will
recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the
amount realized and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the ordinary shares
or
warrants. See “— Exercise or Lapse of a Warrant” below for a
discussion regarding a U.S. Holder’s basis in the ordinary shares acquired
pursuant to the exercise of a warrant.
Capital
gains recognized by U.S. Holders generally are subject to U.S. federal income
tax at the same rate as ordinary income, except that long-term capital gains
recognized by non-corporate U.S. Holders are generally subject to U.S. federal
income tax at a maximum rate of 15% for taxable years beginning before January
1, 2011 (and 20% thereafter). Capital gain or loss will constitute long-term
capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the ordinary shares
exceeds one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to various
limitations.
If PRC
taxes apply to any gain from the disposition of our ordinary shares or warrants
by a U.S. Holder, such taxes may be treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit
against such holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability (subject to certain
limitations), and a U.S. Holder may be entitled to certain benefits under the
income tax treaty between the United States and the PRC. U.S. Holders should
consult their own tax advisors regarding the creditability of any such PRC tax
and their eligibility for the benefits of the income tax treaty between the
United States and the PRC.
Exercise
or Lapse of a Warrant
Subject
to the discussion of the PFIC rules below, a U.S. Holder generally will not
recognize gain or loss upon the exercise of a warrant for cash. Ordinary shares
acquired pursuant to the exercise of a warrant for cash generally will have a
tax basis equal to the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the warrant, increased by the
amount paid to exercise the warrant. The holding period of such ordinary shares
generally would begin on the day after the date of exercise of the warrant. The
terms of a warrant provide for an adjustment to the number of ordinary shares
for which the warrant may be exercised or to the exercise price of the warrant,
in certain events. Such adjustment may, under certain circumstances, result in
constructive distributions that could be taxable to the U.S. Holder of the
warrants. Conversely, the absence of an appropriate adjustment similarly may
result in a constructive distribution that could be taxable to the U.S. Holders
of the ordinary shares. See “—Taxation of Distributions Paid on Ordinary
Shares,” above. If a warrant is allowed to lapse unexercised, a U.S. Holder
generally will recognize a capital loss equal to such holder’s tax basis in the
warrant.
Passive
Foreign Investment Company Rules
A foreign
corporation will be a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, if at least
75% of its gross income in a taxable year, including its pro rata share of the
gross income of any company in which it is considered to own at least 25% of the
shares by value, is passive income. Alternatively, a foreign corporation will be
a PFIC if at least 50% of its assets in a taxable year, ordinarily determined
based on fair market value and averaged quarterly over the year, including its
pro rata share of the assets of any company in which it is considered to own at
least 25% of the shares by value, are held for the production of, or produce,
passive income. Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, rents and
royalties (other than certain rents or royalties derived from the active conduct
of a trade or business), and gains from the disposition of passive
assets.
Based on
the composition of our assets and the nature of our income in
2008, it is likely that we qualified as a PFIC in 2008 (subject to the
possible application of the start-up exception, which depends on future facts
and circumstances). Our actual PFIC status for any subsequent taxable year will
not be determinable until after the end of the taxable year. Accordingly there
can be no assurance with respect to our status as a PFIC for 2008 or
any subsequent taxable year.
If we
qualified as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder held our
ordinary shares or warrants and the U.S. Holder did not make either a
timely qualified electing fund (“QEF”) election for the first taxable year of
its holding period for our ordinary shares or a mark-to-market election, as
described below, such holder will be subject to special rules with respect
to:
|
·
|
any
gain recognized by the U.S. Holder on the sale or other disposition of its
ordinary shares or warrants; and
|
|
·
|
any
“excess distribution” made to the U.S. Holder (generally, any
distributions to such U.S. Holder during a taxable year that are greater
than 125% of the average annual distributions received by such U.S. Holder
in respect of the ordinary shares during the three preceding taxable years
or, if shorter, such U.S. Holder’s holding period for the ordinary
shares).
|
Under
these rules,
|
·
|
the
U.S. Holder’s gain or excess distribution will be allocated ratably over
the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the ordinary shares or
warrants;
|
|
·
|
the
amount allocated to the taxable year in which the U.S. Holder recognized
the gain or received the excess distribution, or to any taxable year prior
to the first taxable year in which we qualified as a PFIC, will be taxed
as ordinary income;
|
|
·
|
the
amount allocated to other taxable years will be taxed at the highest tax
rate in effect for that year and applicable to the U.S. Holder;
and
|
|
·
|
the
interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be
imposed in respect of the tax attributable to each such
year.
|
In
addition, if we are a PFIC, a U.S. Holder who acquires our ordinary
shares or warrants from a deceased U.S. Holder who dies before January 1,
2010 and who had not made a timely QEF election for the ordinary shares
generally will be denied the step-up of U.S. federal income tax basis in such
shares or warrants to their fair market value at the date of the deceased
holder’s death. Instead, such U.S. Holder would have a tax basis in such shares
or warrants equal to the deceased holder’s tax basis, if lower.
In
general, a U.S. Holder may avoid the PFIC tax consequences described above in
respect to our ordinary shares by making a timely QEF election to include in
income its pro rata share of our net capital gains (as long-term capital gain)
and other earnings and profits (as ordinary income), on a current basis, in each
case whether or not distributed. A U.S. Holder may make a separate election to
defer the payment of taxes on undistributed income inclusions under the QEF
rules, but if deferred, any such taxes will be subject to an interest
charge.
A U.S.
Holder may not make a QEF election with respect to its warrants. As a result, if
a U.S. Holder sells or otherwise disposes of a warrant (other than upon exercise
of a warrant), any gain recognized generally will be subject to the special tax
and interest charge rules treating the gain as an excess distribution, as
described above, if we were a PFIC at any time during the period the U.S. Holder
held the warrants. If a U.S. Holder that exercises such warrants properly makes
a QEF election with respect to the newly acquired ordinary shares (or has
previously made a QEF election with respect to our ordinary shares), the QEF
election will apply to the newly acquired ordinary shares, but the adverse tax
consequences relating to PFIC shares will continue to apply with respect to such
ordinary shares (which generally will be deemed to have a holding period for the
purposes of the PFIC rules that includes the period the U.S. Holder held the
warrants), unless the U.S. Holder makes a purging election. The purging election
creates a deemed sale of such shares at their fair market value. The gain
recognized by the purging election will be subject to the special tax and
interest charge rules treating the gain as an excess distribution, as described
above. As a result of the purging election, the U.S. Holder will have a new
basis and holding period in the ordinary shares acquired upon the exercise of
the warrants for purposes of the PFIC rules.
The QEF
election is made on a stockholder-by-stockholder basis and, once made, can be
revoked only with the consent of the IRS. A U.S. Holder generally makes a QEF
election by attaching a completed IRS Form 8621 (Return by a Shareholder of a
Passive Foreign Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund), including the
information provided in a PFIC annual information statement, to a timely filed
U.S. federal income tax return for the tax year to which the election relates.
Retroactive QEF elections generally may be made only by filing a protective
statement with such return and if certain other conditions are met or with the
consent of the IRS.
In order
to comply with the requirements of a QEF election, a U.S. Holder must receive
certain information from us. Upon request from a U.S. Holder, we will endeavor
to provide to the U.S. Holder no later than 90 days after the request such
information as the IRS may require, including a PFIC annual information
statement, in order to enable the U.S. Holder to make and maintain a QEF
election. However, there is no assurance that we will have timely knowledge of
our status as a PFIC in the future or of the required information to be
provided.
If a U.S.
Holder has elected the application of the QEF rules to our ordinary shares, and
the special tax and interest charge rules do not apply to such shares (because
of a timely QEF election for the first tax year of the U.S. Holder’s holding
period for our ordinary shares or a purge of the PFIC taint pursuant to a
purging election, any gain recognized on the appreciation of our ordinary shares
generally will be taxable as capital gain and no interest charge will be
imposed. As discussed above, U.S. Holders of a QEF are currently taxed on their
pro rata shares of its earnings and profits, whether or not distributed. In such
case, a subsequent distribution of such earnings and profits that were
previously included in income generally will not be taxable as a dividend. The
tax basis of a U.S. Holder’s shares in a QEF will be increased by amounts that
are included in income, and decreased by amounts distributed but not taxed as
dividends, under the above rules. Similar basis adjustments apply to property if
by reason of holding such property the U.S. Holder is treated under the
applicable attribution rules as owning shares in a QEF.
Although
a determination as to our PFIC status will be made annually, an initial
determination that our company is a PFIC will generally apply for subsequent
years to a U.S. Holder who held ordinary shares or warrants while we were a
PFIC, whether or not we meet the test for PFIC status in those years. A U.S.
Holder who makes the QEF election discussed above for our first tax year in
which the U.S. Holder holds (or is deemed to hold) our ordinary shares and for
which we are determined to be a PFIC, however, will not be subject to the PFIC
tax and interest charge rules (or the denial of basis step-up at death)
discussed above in respect to such shares. In addition, such U.S. Holder will
not be subject to the QEF inclusion regime with respect to such shares for the
tax years in which we are not a PFIC. On the other hand, if the QEF election is
not effective for each of our tax years in which we are a PFIC and the U.S.
Holder holds (or is deemed to hold) our ordinary shares, the PFIC rules
discussed above will continue to apply to such shares unless the holder makes a
purging election,
as described above, and pays the tax and interest
charge with respect to the gain inherent in such shares attributable to the
pre-QEF election period.
Alternatively,
if a U.S. Holder owns ordinary shares in a PFIC that is treated as marketable
stock, the U.S. Holder may make a mark-to-market election. If the U.S. Holder
makes a valid mark-to-market election for the first tax year in which the U.S.
Holder holds (or is deemed to hold) ordinary shares in AutoChina and for which
it is determined to be a PFIC, such holder generally will not be subject to the
PFIC rules described above in respect to its ordinary shares. Instead, in
general, the U.S. Holder will include as ordinary income each year the excess,
if any, of the fair market value of its ordinary shares at the end of its
taxable year over the adjusted basis in its ordinary shares. The U.S. Holder
also will be allowed to take an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any,
of the adjusted basis of its ordinary shares over the fair market value of its
ordinary shares at the end of its taxable year (but only to the extent of the
net amount of previously included income as a result of the mark-to-market
election). The U.S. Holder’s basis in its ordinary shares will be adjusted to
reflect any such income or loss amounts, and any further gain recognized on a
sale or other taxable disposition of the ordinary shares will be treated as
ordinary income. Currently, a mark-to-market election may not be made with
respect to warrants.
The
mark-to-market election is available only for stock that is regularly traded on
a national securities exchange that is registered with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, or on a foreign exchange or market that the IRS determines
has rules sufficient to ensure that the market price represents a legitimate and
sound fair market value. Because our ordinary shares are listed and
traded only on the OTC Bulletin Board, they may not currently qualify
as marketable stock for purposes of this election. U.S. Holders should consult
their own tax advisors regarding the availability and tax consequences of a
mark-to-market election in respect to our ordinary shares under their particular
circumstances.
If we are
a PFIC and, at any time, have a non-U.S. subsidiary that is classified as a
PFIC, U.S. Holders generally would be deemed to own a portion of the shares of
such lower-tier PFIC, and generally could incur liability for the deferred tax
and interest charge described above if we receive a distribution from, or
dispose of all or part of our interest in, the lower-tier PFIC. Upon request, we
will endeavor to cause any lower-tier PFIC to provide to a U.S. Holder no later
than 90 days after the request the information that may be required to make or
maintain a QEF election with respect to the lower-tier PFIC. U.S. Holders are
urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the tax issues raised by
lower-tier PFICs.
If a U.S.
Holder owns (or is deemed to own) shares during any year in a PFIC, such holder
may have to file an IRS Form 8621 (whether or not a QEF election or
mark-to-market election is made).
The rules
dealing with PFICs and with the QEF and mark-to-market elections are very
complex and are affected by various factors in addition to those described
above. Accordingly, U.S. Holders of our ordinary shares should consult their own
tax advisors concerning the application of the PFIC rules to our ordinary shares
and warrants under their particular circumstances.
Tax
Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders of Ordinary Shares and warrants in
AutoChina
Dividends
paid to a Non-U.S. Holder in respect to its ordinary shares generally will not
be subject to U.S. federal income tax, unless the dividends are effectively
connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the
United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, are
attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base that such holder
maintains in the United States).
In
addition, a Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income
tax on any gain attributable to a sale or other disposition of our ordinary
shares or warrants unless such gain is effectively connected with its conduct of
a trade or business in the United States (and, if required by an applicable
income tax treaty, is attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base
that such holder maintains in the United States) or the Non-U.S. Holder is an
individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the
taxable year of sale or other disposition and certain other conditions are met
(in which case, such gain from United States sources generally is subject to tax
at a 30% rate or a lower applicable tax treaty rate).
Dividends
and gains that are effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a
trade or business in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income
tax treaty, are attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base in the
United States) generally will be subject to tax in the same manner as for a U.S.
Holder and, in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation for U.S.
federal income tax purposes, may also be subject to an additional branch profits
tax at a 30% rate or a lower applicable tax treaty rate.
Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting
In
general, information reporting for U.S. federal income tax purposes will apply
to distributions made on our ordinary shares or warrants within the United
States to a non-corporate U.S. Holder and to the proceeds from sales and other
dispositions of our ordinary shares by a non-corporate U.S. Holder to or through
a U.S. office of a broker. Payments made (and sales and other dispositions
effected at an office) outside the United States will be subject to information
reporting in limited circumstances.
In
addition, backup withholding of United States federal income tax, currently at a
rate of 28%, generally will apply to dividends paid on our ordinary shares to a
non-corporate U.S. Holder and the proceeds from sales and other dispositions of
shares or warrants by a non-corporate U.S. Holder, in each case
who:
|
·
|
fails
to provide an accurate taxpayer identification
number;
|
|
·
|
is
notified by the IRS that backup withholding is required;
or
|
|
·
|
in
certain circumstances, fails to comply with applicable certification
requirements.
|
A
Non-U.S. Holder generally may eliminate the requirement for information
reporting and backup withholding by providing certification of its foreign
status, under penalties of perjury, on a duly executed applicable IRS Form W-8
or by otherwise establishing an exemption.
Backup
withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the amount of any backup
withholding will be allowed as a credit against a U.S. Holder’s or a Non-U.S.
Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle such holder to a
refund, provided that certain required information is timely furnished to the
IRS.
F. Dividends
and paying agents
Not
required.
G. Statement
by experts
Not
required.
H. Documents
on display
Documents
concerning us that are referred to in this document may be inspected at our
principal executive offices at No.322, Zhongshan East Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei,
People’s Republic of China, Tel: +86 311 8382 7688, Fax: +86 311 8381
9636.
In
addition, we will file annual reports and other information with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. We will file annual reports on Form 20-F and
submit other information under cover of Form 6-K. As a foreign private
issuer, we are exempt from the proxy requirements of Section 14 of the
Exchange Act and our officers, directors and principal shareholders will be
exempt from the insider short-swing disclosure and profit recovery rules of
Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Annual reports and other information
we file with the Commission may be inspected at the public reference facilities
maintained by the Commission at Room 1024, 100 F. Street, N.E., Washington,
D.C. 20549, and at its regional offices located at 233 Broadway, New York, New
York 10279 and 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois
60661, and copies of all or any part thereof may be obtained from such offices
upon payment of the prescribed fees. You may call the Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference
rooms and you can request copies of the documents upon payment of a duplicating
fee, by writing to the Commission. In addition, the Commission maintains a
web site that contains reports and other information regarding registrants
(including us) that file electronically with the Commission which can be
assessed at http://www.sec.gov.
I. Subsidiary
Information
Not
required.
ITEM
11.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
Interest
Rate Risk
AutoChina’s
exposure to interest rate risk primarily relates to its outstanding debts and
interest income generated by excess cash, which is mostly held in
interest-bearing bank deposits. AutoChina has not used derivative financial
instruments in its investment portfolio. Interest-earning instruments carry a
degree of interest rate risk. As of March 31, 2009, AutoChina’s total
outstanding loans amounted to $29.9 million with interest rates in the range of
6.6% to 9.1% per annum. AutoChina has not been exposed, nor does it
anticipate being exposed, to material risks due to changes in market interest
rates.
Foreign
Currency Risk
Substantially
all of AutoChina’s revenues and expenditures are denominated in Renminbi. As a
result, fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollars and Renminbi
will affect AutoChina’s financial results in U.S. dollars terms without giving
effect to any underlying change in AutoChina’s business or results of
operations. The Renminbi’s exchange rate with the U.S. dollar and other
currencies is affected by, among other things, changes in China’s political and
economic conditions. The exchange rate for conversion of Renminbi into foreign
currencies is heavily influenced by intervention in the foreign exchange market
by the People’s Bank of China. From 1995 until July 2005, the People’s Bank of
China intervened in the foreign exchange market to maintain an exchange rate of
approximately 8.3 Renminbi per U.S. dollar. On July 21, 2005, the PRC
government changed this policy and began allowing modest appreciation of the
Renminbi versus the U.S. dollar. However, the Renminbi is restricted to a rise
or fall of no more than 0.5% per day versus the U.S. dollar, and the
People’s Bank of China continues to intervene in the foreign exchange market to
prevent significant short-term fluctuations in the Renminbi exchange rate.
Nevertheless, under China’s current exchange rate regime, the Renminbi may
appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the
medium to long term. There remains significant international pressure on the PRC
government to adopt a substantial liberalization of its currency policy, which
could result in a further and more significant appreciation in the value of the
Renminbi against the U.S. dollar.
Very
limited hedging transactions are available in China to reduce AutoChina’s
exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date, AutoChina has not entered into
any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce its exposure to foreign currency
exchange risk. While AutoChina may decide to enter into hedging transactions in
the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedging transactions may
be limited and it may not be able to successfully hedge its exposure at all. In
addition, AutoChina’s currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange
control regulations that restrict its ability to convert Renminbi into foreign
currency.
ITEM
12.
|
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY
SECURITIES
|
Not
required.