Title
of each class
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered
|
Ordinary
shares, par value NIS 0.01 per share
|
The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
Page
|
|
INTRODUCTION
|
ii
|
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
|
ii
|
PART
I
|
1
|
Item
1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
|
1
|
Item
2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
|
1
|
Item
3. Key Information
|
1
|
Item
4. Information on the Company
|
16
|
Item
4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
|
36
|
Item
5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
|
37
|
Item
6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
|
45
|
Item
7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
|
55
|
Item
8. Financial Information
|
56
|
Item
9. The Offer and Listing
|
57
|
Item
10. Additional Information
|
57
|
Item
11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
|
69
|
Item
12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
|
69
|
PART
II
|
|
Item
13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
|
70
|
Item
14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of
Proceeds
|
70
|
Item
15T. Controls and Procedures
|
70
|
Item
16. Reserved
|
71
|
Item
16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
|
71
|
Item
16B. Code of Ethics
|
71
|
Item
16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
71
|
Item
16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit
Committees
|
71
|
Item
16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated
Purchasers
|
71
|
Item 16F. Change in Registrant ’ s Certifying Accountant |
72
|
Item 16G. Corporate Governance |
72
|
PART
III
|
|
Item
17. Financial Statements
|
73
|
Item
18. Financial Statements
|
73
|
Item
19. Exhibits
|
73
|
SIGNATURE
|
75
|
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
F-1
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
Period from
March 9, 2000
(date of
inception)
through
December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Statement of Income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues:
|
$ | 1,511 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,511 | ||||||||||||
Cost
of revenues
|
774 | - | - | - | - | 774 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
737 | - | - | - | - | 737 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research
and development
|
8,705 | 6,400 | 4,781 | 3,173 | 2,041 | 28,204 | ||||||||||||||||||
Marketing
and business development
|
2,368 | 1,742 | 1,504 | 865 | 431 | 6,909 | ||||||||||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
3,703 | 2,903 | 1,860 | 1,145 | 512 | 11,040 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill
impairment
|
850 | - | - | - | - | 850 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
15,626 | 11,045 | 8,145 | 5,193 | 2,984 | 47,003 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
14,889 | 11,045 | 8,145 | 5,193 | 2,984 | 46,266 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial
expenses (income), net
|
(5,449 | ) | 3,616 | (538 | ) | 660 | (2 | ) | (1,334 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Loss
before tax income
|
9,440 | 14,661 | 7,607 | 5,843 | 2,982 | 44,932 | ||||||||||||||||||
Taxes
on income
|
23 | - | - | - | - | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | 9,463 | $ | 14,661 | $ | 7,607 | $ | 5,843 | $ | 2,982 | $ | 44,955 | ||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted net loss per ordinary share
|
$ | 0.79 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 2.98 | $ | 2.35 | $ | 1.19 | ||||||||||||||
Weighted
average number of ordinary shares used to compute basic and diluted net
loss per ordinary share
|
12,038,295 | 11,142,149 | 2,551,860 | 2,495,366 | 2,462,603 |
As of December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Balance Sheet Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 14,454 | $ | 13,590 | $ | 5,228 | $ | 4,917 | $ | 1,514 | ||||||||||
Short-term
bank deposits
|
840 | 112 | 5,149 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Marketable
securities
|
426 | 8,251 | 386 | — | 102 | |||||||||||||||
Trade
receivable
|
502 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Working
capital
|
14,059 | 20,385 | 11,141 | 3,645 | 969 | |||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
20,145 | 26,038 | 13,243 | 5,369 | 2,081 | |||||||||||||||
Convertible
loan
|
750 | — | — | 6,230 | — | |||||||||||||||
Long-term
liabilities
|
1,547 | 568 | 601 | 122 | 42 | |||||||||||||||
Total
shareholders’ equity (deficiency)
|
16,100 | 23,605 | 11,099 | (2,323 | ) | 1,291 | ||||||||||||||
Capital stock | 61,052 | 59,011 | 31,975 | 11,008 | 8,394 |
|
·
|
build
and maintain a strong intellectual property
portfolio;
|
|
·
|
execute
development activities using an unproven
technology;
|
|
·
|
execute
marketing and distribution
activities;
|
|
·
|
continue
to develop and maintain successful strategic
relationships;
|
|
·
|
manage
our spending while costs and expenses increase as we expand our efforts to
discover, develop and commercialize diagnostics and therapeutics based on
microRNAs; and
|
|
·
|
gain
regulatory and commercial acceptance of our tests and
products.
|
|
·
|
progress
in our research and development programs, in particular our program to
develop a non-invasive, blood-based colon cancer screening
test;
|
|
·
|
the
resources, time and costs required to initiate and complete development
and any required preclinical studies and clinical trials, and obtain any
required regulatory approvals;
|
|
·
|
the
timing, receipt, and amount of milestone, royalty and other payments from
present and future collaborators, if
any;
|
|
·
|
costs
necessary to protect our intellectual property;
and
|
|
·
|
the
timing, receipt and amount of sales, if any, by us of any approved tests
or products.
|
|
·
|
royalty
payments;
|
|
·
|
annual
maintenance fees;
|
|
·
|
payment
of fees relating to patent prosecution, maintenance and
enforcement;
|
|
·
|
maintaining
insurance coverage; and
|
|
·
|
using
commercially reasonable efforts to develop tests and products using the
licensed technology.
|
|
·
|
warning
letters;
|
|
·
|
recalls,
public notification or medical product safety
alerts;
|
|
·
|
restrictions
on, or prohibitions against, marketing such tests or
products;
|
|
·
|
restrictions
on importation of such tests or
products;
|
|
·
|
suspension
of review or refusal to approve new or pending
applications;
|
|
·
|
withdrawal
of product approvals;
|
|
·
|
product
seizures;
|
|
·
|
injunctions;
|
|
·
|
civil
and criminal penalties and fines;
and
|
|
·
|
debarment
or other exclusions from government
programs.
|
|
·
|
much
greater financial, technical and human resources than we have at every
stage of the discovery, development, manufacture and commercialization
process;
|
|
·
|
more
extensive experience in preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials,
obtaining regulatory approvals, and in manufacturing and marketing
diagnostics and therapeutics;
|
|
·
|
tests
or products that have been approved or are in late stages of development;
and
|
|
·
|
collaborative
arrangements in our target markets with leading companies and research
institutions.
|
|
·
|
not
experimental or investigational,
|
|
·
|
medically
necessary,
|
|
·
|
appropriate
for the specific patient,
|
|
·
|
cost-effective,
and
|
|
·
|
supported
by peer-reviewed publications.
|
|
·
|
the
timing of any marketing approvals, the terms of any approvals and the
countries in which approvals are
obtained;
|
|
·
|
the
success of physician education
programs;
|
|
·
|
the
availability of alternative diagnostics and therapeutics;
and
|
|
·
|
the
pricing of such tests or products, particularly as compared to
alternatives.
|
|
·
|
pursue
alternative technologies or develop alternative tests or products, either
on its own or jointly with others, that may be competitive with the tests
or products on which it is collaborating with us or which could affect its
commitment to the collaboration with
us;
|
|
·
|
pursue
higher priority programs or change the focus of their development
programs, which could affect the collaborator’s commitment to us;
or
|
|
·
|
if
it has marketing rights and obligations, choose to devote fewer resources
to the marketing of our tests or products, than they do for tests or
products of their own development, or of their co-development with third
parties.
|
|
·
|
we
may not be able to attract and build a significant marketing or sales
force;
|
|
·
|
the
cost of establishing a marketing or sales force may not be justifiable in
light of the revenues generated by any particular test or product;
and
|
|
·
|
our
direct sales and marketing efforts may not be
successful.
|
|
·
|
fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates that may increase the U.S. dollar cost
of our international operations;
|
|
·
|
difficulty
managing operations in multiple locations, which could adversely affect
the progress of our development programs and business
prospects;
|
|
·
|
local
regulations that may restrict or impair our ability to conduct
pharmaceutical and biotechnology-based research and
development;
|
|
·
|
foreign
protectionist laws and business practices that favor local
competition;
|
|
·
|
failure
of local laws to provide the same degree of protection against
infringement of our intellectual property, which could adversely affect
our ability to develop tests or products or reduce future product or
royalty revenues, if any, from tests or products we may
develop;
|
|
·
|
laws
and regulations governing U.S. immigration and entry into the United
States that may restrict free movement of our employees between Israel and
the United States; and
|
|
·
|
laws
and regulations governing U.S. immigration and entry into the United
States that may restrict employment of Israeli citizens in our U.S.
facilities.
|
|
·
|
the
rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange
Act, requiring the filing with the SEC of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q
and current reports on Form 8-K;
|
|
·
|
the
sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies,
consents or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the
Exchange Act;
|
|
·
|
the
provisions of Regulation FD aimed at preventing issuers from making
selective disclosures of material information;
and
|
|
·
|
the
sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of
their stock ownership and trading activities and establishing insider
liability for profits realized from any “short-swing” trading transaction
(a purchase and sale, or sale and purchase, of the issuer’s equity
securities within less than six
months).
|
|
·
|
delaying,
deferring or preventing a change in control of our
company;
|
|
·
|
entrenching
our management and/or board of
directors;
|
|
·
|
impeding
a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving
our company; or
|
|
·
|
discouraging
a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to
obtain control of our company.
|
|
·
|
Focus on the development of
minimally/non-invasive, blood or serum-based tests with potential for
greater acceptance by healthcare professionals.
We believe that the
sensitive and specific methods we have developed to extract and profile
the expression of microRNAs in serum and plasma will enable the
development of minimally/non-invasive, blood or serum-based molecular
diagnostics tests. We are currently focusing most of our research and
development efforts on the development of minimally-invasive, blood-based
colon cancer screen. While we can provide no assurance that we
will be successful in developing this test, if we are successful, we would
expect to launch this test in late 2009 or early 2010 as a
laboratory-based test, by our CLIA-certified clinical laboratory in
Philadelphia.
|
|
·
|
Build and maintain a strong
intellectual property position.
We believe that we were the first
commercial enterprise to focus on the emerging field of microRNAs. We also
believe we have an early and strong intellectual property position (both
patents we own and those we have exclusively licensed) in the area of
developing and commercializing microRNA-based diagnostic tests. Our patent
strategy is to seek broad coverage on all of our identified microRNA
sequences, followed by the filing of patent applications claiming
composition-of-matter on microRNAs of commercial interest. We have also
filed, and intend to continue to file, patent applications that claim
method-of-use for specific diagnostic
applications.
|
|
·
|
Leverage our intellectual
property position and microRNA expertise to continue to establish
strategic collaborations.
We intend to continue to establish
strategic collaborations with leading clinical diagnostic and
pharmaceutical companies to further develop and commercialize
microRNA-based diagnostics. We believe that our strong intellectual
property position and expertise in the field of microRNAs will be
very attractive to additional collaboration
partners.
|
|
·
|
Maximize sales of our first
three commercial tests through geographic partners.
In
addition to our focus on the development of microRNA-based
minimally/non-invasive, blood or serum-based tests, we plan to maximize
revenues from our three current commercial tests via corporate
partnerships. In April 2009, we entered into a license and
collaboration agreement with Prometheus Laboratories Inc. pursuant to
which Prometheus has the exclusive right to commercialize miRview
TM
mets, miRview
TM
squamous and miRview
TM
meso in the United States. In addition, in December 2008, we
entered into an agreement with Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.,
pursuant to which Teva has the exclusive right to commercialize these
tests in Turkey and Israel. We intend to support the work of these
partners while pursuing other partnerships for additional
geographies.
|
|
·
|
Partner selectively to enhance
the overall value of our tests
. In order to maximize
value for our microRNA-based diagnostic tests and promote their commercial
success, we intend to selectively collaborate with partners with proven
success in the diagnostic field, sales and marketing abilities and success
of securing reimbursement for tests and products in the molecular
diagnostic field. We cannot assure you, however, that we will be
successful in entering into any such collaborations on commercially
reasonable terms, or at all.
|
|
·
|
the
existence or the probability of developing
disease;
|
|
·
|
the
exact type of the disease;
|
|
·
|
the
severity of the disease;
|
|
·
|
the
potential efficacy of specific therapies, such as different drugs or
therapeutic procedures;
|
|
·
|
the
monitoring of success of a chosen therapy;
and
|
|
·
|
the
likelihood of disease recurrence.
|
|
·
|
Access to samples.
As a
prerequisite for clinical validation of diagnostics products, evaluation
of clinical samples is critical. Accordingly, we have entered into
collaborations with several institutions in Israel and in the United
States that provide us high quality clinical samples. These relationships
provide us the opportunity to study thousands of well-characterized
samples of lung, colorectal, breast, brain, bladder, lymphoma, leukemia,
liver and others. The sample collections include solid tumor samples,
healthy tissue samples, and various body fluids such as blood, urine and
sputum, as well as high quality tissue samples from archival pathology
banks. Where relevant, samples are accompanied by a database of medical
history and clinical information, such as diagnosis, treatment and
response to treatment, recurrence and survival, which for the samples from
the archival pathology banks can be as long as 20
years.
|
|
·
|
RNA extraction.
We
utilize both commercial and our proprietary technologies to extract
relevant microRNA from both tissue and body fluid
samples.
|
|
·
|
Expression profiling.
The identification of microRNA biomarkers requires sensitive and
specific measurements of the levels of the microRNAs extracted from the
tissue or body fluid samples. We have developed proprietary methods to
rapidly, robustly and accurately perform these measurements. Our methods
allow us to perform simultaneous profiling of multiple samples, and we
believe result in more accurate measurements of expression levels for each
of the analyzed samples.
|
|
·
|
Analysis.
We analyze
expression profiles to identify microRNA signatures which detect the
existence of disease and provide information on certain disease
parameters, such as tumor subtype, tumor origin, tumor aggressiveness,
response to treatment and risk of recurrence. Identifying microRNA
signatures is a complex task, and we believe our analytical expertise is
one of our key advantages.
|
|
·
|
miRview™ mets
– This
test, designed with cancer of unknown primary, or
CUP, patients in mind, can accurately identify the primary
tumor site in patients presenting with metastatic
cancer. Accurate identification of the primary origin is
critical for determining treatment. Current diagnostic methods
to identify the origin of a metastasis include a range of costly,
time-consuming and at times inefficient tests, and still, in about
5% of all cancer patients, the origin of the primary tumor is never
identified. miRview™ mets offers physicians a fast, accurate
and easy-to-interpret diagnosis of the predicted primary
origin.
|
|
·
|
miRview™ squamous
–
This test differentiates squamous from non-squamous non-small cell lung
cancer (NSCLC). Current methods for differentiating squamous from
non-squamous NSCLC are not standardized, are difficult to reproduce and
have an unacceptable level of variability between pathologists and
laboratories, as indicated in numerous peer review publications.
miRview™ squamous produces a single score that clearly indicates whether a
sample is squamous or non-squamous NSCLC. It is estimated that about
60,000 lung cancer patients who are candidates for targeted therapy may
potentially use this test.
|
|
·
|
miRview™ meso
– The
test leverages microRNA’s high-specificity as biomarkers to differentiate
mesothelioma, a cancer connected to asbestos exposure and other risk
factors, from other carcinomas in the lung and pleura, a medically and
legally important differential diagnosis. As mesothelioma
patients require specific treatment regimens, an accurate diagnosis is
critical. Pathological diagnosis may suffer from significant
inter-observer variability, and in the absence of a single specific and
reliable test, mesothelioma can be difficult to identify from other
cancers.
|
·
|
First,
by the end of the second quarter of 2009, we intend to conclude the
discovery phase, in which we expect to finalize the microRNA content of
the test. In this phase, we will continue screening dozens of
samples from colon cancer patients of various stages, as well as
age-matched controls. In the past several months, we have
improved our microRNA panel for high-throughput screening to include
additional potential markers, specifically focusing on more novel cancer
and colon cancer related microRNAs we have
discovered.
|
·
|
Second,
by the end of the third quarter of 2009, we intend to complete the assay
development phase. In this phase, we expect to translate the
discovery results into an assay. This means we intend to
finalize the list of biomarkers, the design of the plate, the various
controls and QC parameters, as well as the optimal interpretation of the
assay results for a colon cancer detection
test.
|
·
|
And
third, should we be successful in developing this test, we believe it will
be commercially available in the U.S. through our CLIA-certified lab in
late 2009 or early 2010. Within this timeframe we also expect
to publicly present scientific data on the accuracy of this
test.
|
|
·
|
obtain
and maintain patent and other proprietary protection for the technology,
inventions and improvements we consider important to our
business;
|
|
·
|
defend
our patents;
|
|
·
|
preserve
the confidentiality of our trade secrets;
and
|
|
·
|
operate
without infringing the patents and proprietary rights of third
parties.
|
|
·
|
provide
for utility, function and disease targets for each microRNA
sequence;
|
|
·
|
claim
specific microRNA sequences as opposed to general mechanism or concept;
and
|
|
·
|
identify
the functional fragment of each microRNA
sequence.
|
|
·
|
the
longer of 17 years from the issue date or 20 years from the earliest
effective filing date, if the patent application was filed prior to June
8, 1995; and
|
|
·
|
20
years from the earliest effective filing date, if the patent application
was filed on or after June 8, 1995.
|
|
·
|
the
safety and effectiveness of our
products;
|
|
·
|
the
timing and scope of regulatory approvals for these tests and
products;
|
|
·
|
the
availability and cost of manufacturing, marketing and sales
capabilities;
|
|
·
|
reimbursement
coverage; and
|
|
·
|
patent
position.
|
|
·
|
completion
of preclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies in
compliance with the FDA’s Good Laboratory Practices or other applicable
regulations;
|
|
·
|
submission
to the FDA of an investigational new drug application, or IND, which must
become effective before human clinical trials may
begin;
|
|
·
|
approval
by an institutional review board, or IRB, at each institution
participating in a clinical trial, which must review and approve the plan
for any clinical trial before it commences at that
institution;
|
|
·
|
performance
of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with
Good Clinical Practices, or GCPs, to establish the safety and efficacy of
the proposed drug for its intended
use;
|
|
·
|
submission
to the FDA of a new drug application, or NDA, if the drug is a small
molecule, or a biologics license application, or BLA, if the drug is a
biologic;
|
|
·
|
satisfactory
completion of an FDA inspection of the manufacturing facility or
facilities at which the drug is produced to assess compliance with current
Good Manufacturing Practice, or cGMP, to assure that the facilities,
methods and controls are adequate to preserve the drug’s identity,
strength, quality and purity; and
|
|
·
|
FDA
review and approval of the NDA or
BLA.
|
|
·
|
Phase 1:
The drug is
initially introduced into healthy human subjects and tested for safety,
dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution and excretion. In
the case of some products for severe or life-threatening diseases,
especially when the product may be too inherently toxic to ethically
administer to healthy volunteers, the initial human testing is often
conducted in patients.
|
|
·
|
Phase 2:
Involves
studies in a limited patient population to identify possible adverse
effects and safety risks, to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the
product for specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance
and optimal dosage.
|
|
·
|
Phase 3:
Involves
studies undertaken to further evaluate dosage, clinical efficacy and
safety in an expanded patient population at geographically dispersed
clinical study sites. These studies are intended to establish the overall
risk-benefit ratio of the product and provide an adequate basis for
product labeling.
|
|
·
|
our
research and development programs;
|
|
·
|
our
patent and publication strategies;
|
|
·
|
new
technologies relevant to our research and development programs;
and
|
|
·
|
specific
scientific and technical issues relevant to our
business.
|
Name
|
Position/Institutional
Affiliation
|
|
Prof.
J. Aaron Ciechanover, M.D., D.Sc. Chairman
|
Prof.
Ciechanover is a Nobel Prize laureate in Chemistry (2004) and a recipient
of the prestigious Lasker Award (2000) for the discovery and recognition
of the significance of the ubiquitin system of regulated protein
degradation. Prof. Ciechanover is the Director of the Rappaport Family
Institute for Research in the medical sciences and professor of
biochemistry at the Technion - Israel Institute of
Technology.
|
Prof.
Zvi Bentwich, M.D., Deputy Chairman
|
Prof.
Bentwich has served as our Chief Scientist since June 2002 until April
2009, and as Chairman and Deputy Chairman of our Scientific Advisory Board
since 2003. He is a world-renowned authority in AIDS research and is
considered one of the leaders and founders of the discipline of Clinical
Immunology. Prof. Bentwich founded and headed Israel’s largest AIDS
center. He is the author of more than 250 scientific publications and has
been a member of leading editorial boards and professional bodies,
including Chair of the Clinical Immunology Committee of the International
Union of Immunological Societies, President of the Israeli Society of
Clinical Immunology and Allergy and of the Israel Society of STD. He has
been a professor of medicine at the Hebrew University since 1981, and a
professor of virology and head of a new center for Infectious Diseases and
AIDS at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev since 2004. Prof. Bentwich is
the father of our founder and board member, Dr. Isaac
Bentwich.
|
|
Prof.
Michael Sela, Ph.D.
|
Prof.
Sela, an Israel Prize laureate, was the President of the Weizmann
Institute of Science from 1975 to 1985 and has served as Deputy Chairman
of the Board of Governors of the Weizmann Institute since 1985. Prof. Sela
is a member of Teva Pharmaceuticals’ board of directors and led the
development efforts for Copaxone, Teva’s multiple sclerosis drug. He is a
professor of immunology at the Weizmann Institute of Science and is the
author of 19 patents. He has published more than 450 articles in leading
scientific journals, including abstracts and book
reviews.
|
|
Prof.
Yinon Ben Nerya, M.D., Ph.D.
|
Prof.
Ben-Nerya serves as Professor and Chair in the Department of Immunology,
Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical School and as Visiting Professor,
Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School. Prof. Ben-Neriah is
also a member of the European Cancer Forum (EMBO), and Head of
the Proteomics and Drug Design Program at Hebrew University Medical
School.
|
|
Prof.
Gideon Rechavi M.D., Ph.D.
|
Prof.
Rechavi is one of Israel’s most honored cancer researchers and an
internationally known scientist, He is the head of the Sheba
Cancer Research Center in Israel. Prof. Rechavi is the author of numerous
papers that have been published in the most distinguished scientific
journals such as Nature Medicine, Nature Genetics, Nature Biotechnology,
Nature Cell Biology and the Proceedings of the National Academy of
Science.
|
Name
|
Position/Institutional
Affiliation
|
|
Prof.
Moshe Hod, M.D., Chairman
|
Prof.
Moshe Hod is Director of the Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine in the
Helen Schneider Hospital for Woman at Rabin Medical Center in Tel Aviv
University in Israel. Author of more than 200 articles and recognized as
an international authority on diabetes and pregnancy, Prof. Hod received
the World Fellowship Award for Outstanding Research from the 12th World
Congress of the Israel Medical Association and a prize from the 12th
European Congress of Perinatal Medicine for his paper on the effects of
hyperglycemia on sorbitol and myo-inositol content. Prof. Hod served as
Chairman of the Committee on Diabetes and Pregnancy for The National
Council of Diabetes in the Israeli Ministry of Health and as Chairman of
the Board for the Diabetic Pregnancy Study Group of the European
Association for the Study of Diabetes. Prof. Hod was educated at Technion,
Israel Institute of Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Haifa,
Israel.
|
Prof.
Harvey I. Pass, M.D., Vice Chairman
|
Prof.
Pass, is Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Surgery, Director of
Surgical Research, and Division Chief for Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic
Oncology for the NYU School of Medicine. Prof. Pass received his
undergraduate education from Johns Hopkins University and graduated from
Duke University Medical School. He trained in Cardiothoracic Surgery at
the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston. He was a senior
staff fellow in the Thoracic Oncology Section at the National Cancer
Institute/NIH in Bethesda, Maryland from 1983 to 1986 and became Head of
Thoracic Oncology at NCI from 1986 to 1996. Before moving to New
York, he was Professor of Surgery and Oncology for Wayne State University
and the Karmanos Cancer Institute. He is internationally recognized as an
expert in the multidisciplinary management of lung cancer, mesothelioma,
esophageal cancer, and the management of pulmonary metastases. He is known
for his development of novel clinical trials for the treatment of thoracic
malignancies as well as building a strong translational component to his
programs with benchwork investigations. Dr. Pass has received the NIH
Directors Award, the Presidents Award for Clinical Research at Karmanos
Cancer Institute, and the Wagner Medal from the International Mesothelioma
Interest Group. He is presently a Board Member of the International
Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, the International Mesothelioma
Interest Group, the Mesothelioma Foundation, and the Lung Cancer Alliance.
Dr. Pass has been recognized as an America’s Top Doctor and Best Cancer
Doctor by Castle Connoly’s Guide for the last seven
years.
|
|
David
Sidransky, M.D.
|
Dr.
Sidransky is a renowned oncologist and research scientist named and
profiled by TIME magazine in 2001 as one of the top physicians and
scientists in America, recognized for his work with early detection of
cancer. He is Professor of Oncology, Otolaryngology, Cellular &
Molecular Medicine, Urology, Genetics, and Pathology at John Hopkins
University and Hospital. Dr. Sidransky has written over 300 peer-reviewed
publications, and has contributed more than 40 cancer reviews and
chapters. Dr. Sidransky is a founder of a number of biotechnology
companies and holds numerous biotechnology patents. He has been the
recipient of many awards and honors, including the 1997 Sarstedt
International prize from the German Society of Clinical Chemistry, 1998
Alton Ochsner Award Relating Smoking and Health by the American College of
Chest Physicians and the 2004 Hinda Rosenthal Award presented by the
American Association of Cancer Research. Dr. Sidransky has served as Vice
Chairman of the Board of Directors, and presently is a director of
ImClone. He is Chairman of Alfacell and serves on the Board of Directors
of Xenomics. He is serving and has served on scientific advisory boards of
MedImmune, Roche, Amgen and Veridex, LLC (a Johnson & Johnson
diagnostic company), among others. In Addition, Dr. Sidransky served as
Director of American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) from 2005 to
2008. Dr. Sidransky received his bachelor’s degree from Brandeis
University and his medical degree from the Baylor College of
Medicine.
|
|
Prof.
Jack Baniel, M.D.
|
Dr.
Baniel is an internationally renowned authority on testicular and bladder
cancer. Currently, he is Professor of Urology and Acting Chief of the
Urological Section at Rabin Medical Center and Deputy-Head of the Davidoff
Comprehensive Cancer Center in Israel. Dr. Baniel is the author of
numerous peer-reviewed papers in the field of Urological Oncology. As a
member of the EORTC – GU Group, he is involved in clinical studies and the
development of new medical technologies. Dr. Baniel trained in Urology at
the Rabin Medical Center and Witwatersrand University in Johannesburg,
South Africa. He was a Graduate Fellow in Urological Oncology at Indiana
University.
|
Prof.
Raphael Catane, M.D.
|
Dr.
Catane is Professor and Chairman of the Division of Oncology at The Chaim
Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. He is the author of more than
120 scholarly articles dealing with such matters as the central action of
regitine on blood pressure and MR-guided focused surgery for the
palliation of pain in patients with bone cancer. In addition, Dr. Çatane
has written dozens of review articles, case reports and book chapters and
is a member of the American Association of Cancer Research and many other
leading professional societies involving oncology, radiotherapy and
immunology. Previously, Dr. Catane was Director of Clinical Cancer
Research at Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Pharmaceutical Research Institute, and
Acting Head of the Sharett Institute of Oncology at the Hadassah
University Hospital in Jerusalem, Israel. He was educated at Hadassah
Medical School in Hebrew University.
|
|
Dr.
Isaac Yaniv, M.D.
|
Dr.
Yaniv is the chairman of the Pediatric Hematology Oncology Division at the
Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel. He established the first
dedicated pediatric bone marrow transplantation unit in Israel and played
a leading role as a member of the EUROCORD Group in promoting the field of
umbilical cord blood transplantation. Furthermore, Dr. Yaniv established a
stem cell research center focusing on homing and seeding as well as
pluripotency of stem cells. Dr. Yaniv is Senior Lecturer at the Sackler
Faculty of Medicine at the Tel Aviv University and medical director of the
Ezer Mizion bone marrow donor registry. Dr. Yaniv has published more than
120 articles in peer-reviewed journals and conducts clinical and molecular
research in the field of pediatric malignancies.
|
|
Dr.
Maya Gottfried, M.D.
|
Dr.
Gottfried has earned distinction for her extensive clinical and academic
experience. A specialist in medical oncology and radiotherapy, she is
currently Head of the Lung Oncology Unit at the Meir Medical Center in
Kfar-Saba, Israel. Dr. Gottfried is a member of the Israel Society of
Clinical Oncology & Radiotherapy, the European Association for Cancer
Research, the European Society of Medical Oncology and the International
Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. She has been a valued
participant in many clinical trials, several as principal investigator,
and has made presentations in major scientific meetings, including the
21st ESMO Congress in Vienna, the ASCO meeting in New Orleans, the 11th
World Conference on Lung Cancer in Barcelona, the 1st Congress of Lung
Cancer Experts in Hamburg and the Global Cancer Group in
Lisbon.
|
|
·
|
progress
in our research and development
programs;
|
|
·
|
the
resources, time and costs required to initiate and complete development
and any required preclinical studies and clinical trials, and obtain
regulatory approvals for our
products;
|
|
·
|
the
timing, receipt, and amount of milestone, royalty and other payments from
present and future collaborators, if
any;
|
|
·
|
costs
necessary to protect our intellectual
property;
|
|
·
|
the
timing, receipt and amount of sales, if any, by us of any approved
products.
|
|
·
|
delay,
reduce the scope of or eliminate certain research and development
programs;
|
|
·
|
obtain
funds through arrangements with collaborators or others on terms
unfavorable to us or that may require us to relinquish rights to certain
technologies or products that we might otherwise seek to develop or
commercialize independently;
|
|
·
|
or
pursue merger or acquisition
strategies.
|
Total
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
Thereafter
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
and capital lease obligations
|
$ | 2,756 | $ | 985 | $ | 750 | $ | 403 | $ | 372 | $ | 246 | $ | - | ||||||||||||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
$ | 4,977 | $ | 150 | $ | 189 | $ | 228 | $ | 253 | $ | 253 | $ | 3,904 |
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
||
Amir
Avniel
|
36
|
Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
||
Ronen
Tamir
|
42
|
Chief
Commercialization Officer
|
||
Dalia
Cohen, Ph.D.
|
57
|
Chief
Scientific Officer
|
||
Ranit
Aharonov, Ph.D.
|
39
|
Executive
Vice President, R&D, Head of Computational Biology
|
||
Ayelet
Chajut, Ph.D.
|
46
|
Executive
Vice President, R&D, Head of Molecular Biology
|
||
Limor
Zur-Stoller
|
40
|
Vice
President Finance
|
||
Tami
Fishman Jutkowitz
|
33
|
General
Counsel
|
||
Yoav
Chelouche(2)(3)
|
55
|
Chairman
of the Board
|
||
Isaac
Bentwich, M.D.
|
47
|
Director
|
||
Prof.
Moshe Many, M.D.(1)
|
80
|
Director
|
||
Simcha
Sadan, Ph.D.
|
68
|
Director
|
||
Joshua
Rosensweig, Ph.D.
|
56
|
Director
|
||
Gerald
Dogon(1)(2)(3)
|
69
|
External
Director
|
||
Tali
Yaron-Eldar(1)
|
45
|
External
Director
|
|
·
|
the
Class I director is Yoav Chelouche, and his term expires at the annual
general meeting of shareholders to be held in
2011;
|
|
·
|
the
Class II directors are Dr. Simcha Sadan, and Dr. Joshua Rosensweig, and
their terms expire at the annual general meeting of shareholders to be
held in 2009; and
|
|
·
|
the
Class III directors are Prof. Moshe Many and Dr. Isaac Bentwich, and their
terms expire at the annual general meeting of shareholders to be held in
2010.
|
|
·
|
an
employment relationship;
|
|
·
|
a
business or professional relationship maintained on a regular
basis;
|
|
·
|
control;
and
|
|
·
|
service
as an office holder, excluding service as a director in a private company
prior to the first offering of its shares to the public if such director
was appointed as a director of the private company in order to serve as an
external director following the public
offering.
|
|
·
|
at
least one-third of the shares of non-controlling shareholders that voted
at the meeting, vote in favor of the election of the external director
(disregarding abstentions); or
|
|
·
|
the
total number of shares of non-controlling shareholders that voted against
the election of the external director does not exceed one percent of the
aggregate voting rights in the
company.
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Number of Shares
Beneficially
Owned
|
Percentage of
Outstanding
Ordinary Shares
|
||||||
Amir
Avniel (1)
|
143,812 | 1.0 | % | |||||
Ronen
Tamir (2)
|
44,540 | * | ||||||
Dalia
Cohen, Ph.D.(3)
|
18,730 | * | ||||||
Ranit
Aharonov, Ph.D. (4)
|
34,645 | * | ||||||
Ayelet
Chajut, Ph.D.(5)
|
18,781 | * | ||||||
Limor
Zur-Stoller
|
- | * | ||||||
Tami
Fishman Jutkowitz (6)
|
10,498 | * | ||||||
Yoav
Chelouche (7)
|
199,360 | 1.4 | % | |||||
Isaac
Bentwich, M.D. (8)
|
1,655,401 | 11.7 | % | |||||
Prof.
Moshe Many, M.D. (9)
|
46,522 | * | ||||||
Simcha
Sadan, Ph.D. (10)
|
59,195 | * | ||||||
Joshua
Rosensweig.(11)
|
157,849 | 1.1 | % | |||||
Gerald
Dogon (12)
|
9,510 | * | ||||||
Tali
Yaron-Eldar (13)
|
9,510 | * | ||||||
Directors
and executive officers as a group (14 persons) (14)
|
2,408,253 | 16.4 | % |
*
|
Represents
beneficial ownership of less than 1% of ordinary
shares.
|
(1)
|
Consists
of options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 1,
2009 to purchase 75,336 ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of
$0.00 per share and expire in May 2013), 1,429 ordinary shares (which have
an exercise price of $0.00 per share and expire in May 2014), 37,668
ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of $0.00 per share and
expire in December 2014), 829 ordinary shares (which have an
exercise price of $0.00 per share and expire in June 2015) and 28,550
ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of $5.68 per
share and expire in September
2016).
|
(2)
|
Consists
of options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 1,
2009 to purchase 44,540 ordinary shares (which have an exercise
price of $5.45 per share and expire in December
2017),
|
(3)
|
Consists
of options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 1,
2008 to purchase 18,730 ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of
$6.59 per share and expire in August
2016).
|
(4)
|
Consists
of options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 1,
2009 to purchase 3,516 ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of
$0.00 per share and expire in June 2013), 251 ordinary shares (which have
an exercise price of $0.00 per share and expire in January 2014), 1,308
ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of $0.00 per share and
expire in May 2014), 4,771 ordinary shares (which have an exercise price
of $0.00 per share and expire in December 2014), 659 ordinary shares
(which have an exercise price of $0.00 per share and expire in June 2015),
16,265 ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of $3.50 per share
and expire in January 2016) and 7,875 ordinary shares (which have an
exercise price of $4.16 per share and expire in June
2018).
|
(5)
|
Consists
of options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 1,
2009 to purchase 5,650 ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of
$4.37 per share and expire in June 2016), 1,256 ordinary shares (which
have an exercise price of $4.37 per share and expire in January 2017),
11,875 ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of $4.16 per share
and expire in June 2018),
|
(6)
|
Consists
of options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 1,
2009 to purchase 6,123 ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of
$3.50 per share and expire in April 2016) and 4,375 ordinary shares (which
have an exercise price of $4.7 per share and expire in July
2018).
|
(7)
|
Consists
of (i) 17,137 ordinary shares held by Yunsan Ltd., a company controlled by
Mr. Chelouche, the chairman of our board of directors, (ii) 14,228
ordinary shares and (iii) options currently exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days of June 1, 2009 to purchase 10,288 ordinary shares (which
have an exercise price of $0.00 per share and expire in April 2012) and
157,707 ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of $3.50 per share
and expire in July 2016).
|
(8)
|
Consists
of (i) 1,105,870 ordinary shares directly owned by Dr. Bentwich, (ii)
549,531 ordinary shares held by Harmonia 2000. Harmonia 2000 is an Israeli
non-profit association, of which Dr. Bentwich is one of seven members, and
one of three members of its managing board. The members of Harmonia 2000’s
managing board control the securities held by Harmonia 2000, and Dr.
Bentwich may therefore be deemed to beneficially own the securities owned
by Harmonia 2000. Dr. Bentwich disclaims any beneficial ownership of the
securities owned by Harmonia 2000.
|
(9)
|
Consists
of (i) 26,932 ordinary shares held by Prof. Many and (ii) options
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 1, 2009 to
purchase 6,908 ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of $3.50 per
share and expire in July 2016) and 12,682 ordinary shares (which have an
exercise price of $6.15 per share and expire in July
2016).
|
(10)
|
Consists
of (i) 4,923 ordinary shares held by Dr. Sadan, (ii) 43,705 ordinary
shares held by SMB Ltd., a company controlled by Dr. Sadan and (iii)
options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 1,
2009 to purchase 10,567 ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of
$6.03 per share and expire in January
2017).
|
(11)
|
Consists
of (i) 138,259 ordinary shares held by Dr. Rosensweig, (ii) options
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 1, 2009 to
purchase 6,908 ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of $3.50 per
share and expire in July 2016) and 12,682 ordinary shares (which have an
exercise price of $6.15 per share and expire in July
2016).
|
(12)
|
Consists
of options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 1,
2009 to purchase 9,510 ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of
$8.8 per share and expire in March
2017).
|
(13)
|
Consists
of options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 1,
2009 to purchase 9,510 ordinary shares (which have an exercise price of
$8.8 per share and expire in March
2017).
|
(14)
|
See
notes 1 through 13 above.
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)
|
Number of Shares
Beneficially
Owned(5)
|
Percentage of
Outstanding
Ordinary Shares
|
||||||
Prometheus
Laboratories Inc. (2)
|
2,000,000 | 14.1 | % | |||||
Isaac
Bentwich, M.D. (3)
|
1,655,401 | 11.7 | % | |||||
Far
West Capital Management (4)
|
855,650 | 6.0 | % |
(1)
|
Unless
otherwise noted, the address for each of the individuals noted above is
c/o Rosetta Genomics Ltd., 10 Plaut Street, Science Park, Rehovot 76706
Israel.
|
(2)
|
Based
solely on a Schedule 13G filed by Prometheus with the SEC on May 4, 2009.
Prometheus’ address is 9410 Carroll Park Drive, San Diego, California
92121.
|
(3)
|
Consists
of (i) 1,105,870 ordinary shares directly owned by Dr. Bentwich, (ii)
549,531 ordinary shares held by Harmonia 2000. Harmonia 2000 is an Israeli
non-profit association, of which Dr. Bentwich is one of seven members, and
one of three members of its managing board. The members of Harmonia 2000’s
managing board control the securities held by Harmonia 2000, and Dr.
Bentwich may therefore be deemed to beneficially own the securities owned
by Harmonia 2000. Dr. Bentwich disclaims any beneficial ownership of the
securities owned by Harmonia 2000.
|
(4)
|
Based
solely on a Schedule 13G filed by Far West Capital Management with the SEC
on May 18, 2009. Far West capital Management’s address is 4749 Nicasio
Valley Road, Nicasio, California
94946.
|
(5)
|
Our
ordinary shares are traded on the NASDAQ Global Market in the United
State. A significant portion of our shares are held in street name,
therefore we generally have no way of determining who our shareholders
are, their geographical location or how many shares a particular
shareholder owns.
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Percentage of
Outstanding
Ordinary
Shares Owned
as of March 31,
2007
|
Percentage of
Outstanding
Ordinary Shares
Owned as of
June 1, 2008
|
Percentage of
Outstanding
Ordinary Shares
Owned as of
June 1, 2009
|
|||||||||
Amir
Avniel
|
5.5 | % | 5.6 | % | 1.0 | % | ||||||
Isaac
Bentwich, M.D.
|
16.0 | % | 15.9 | % | 11.7 | % | ||||||
Highbridge
International LLC (1)
|
6.5 | % | 6.7 | % | - | |||||||
Entities
and Persons affiliated with Davidson Kempner Partners (2)
|
- | 5.3 | % | - | ||||||||
Prometheus
Laboratories Inc. (3)
|
- | - | 14.1 | % | ||||||||
Far
West Capital Management (4)
|
- | - | 6.0 | % |
(1)
|
Based
solely on (i) a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on March 5, 2007 and (ii)
a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 30,
2008.
|
(2)
|
Based
solely on (i) a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 17, 2008 and
(ii) a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 17,
2009.
|
(3)
|
Based
solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on May 4,
2009.
|
(4)
|
Based
solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on May 18,
2009.
|
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
Year Ended
|
||||||||
December
31, 2007
|
$ | 10.33 | $ | 4.75 | ||||
December
31, 2008
|
$ | 6.25 | $ | 1.08 | ||||
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
March
31, 2007
|
$ | 10.33 | $ | 6.20 | ||||
June
30, 2007
|
$ | 8.94 | $ | 6.30 | ||||
September
30, 2007
|
$ | 7.90 | $ | 4.95 | ||||
December
31, 2007
|
$ | 7.00 | $ | 4.75 | ||||
March
31, 2008
|
$ | 6.25 | $ | 3.41 | ||||
June
30, 2008
|
$ | 5.44 | $ | 4.00 | ||||
September
30, 2008
|
$ | 5.07 | $ | 2.46 | ||||
December
31, 2008
|
$ | 3.00 | $ | 1.08 | ||||
March
31, 2009
|
$ | 3.80 | $ | 1.18 | ||||
Month Ended
|
||||||||
December
31, 2008
|
$ | 2.51 | $ | 1.08 | ||||
January
31, 2009
|
$ | 3.11 | $ | 1.18 | ||||
February
28, 2009
|
$ | 3.80 | $ | 2.47 | ||||
March
31, 2009
|
$ | 3.07 | $ | 2.04 | ||||
April
30, 2009
|
$ | 3.80 | $ | 2.69 | ||||
May
31, 2009
|
$ | 3.60 | $ | 2.91 |
|
·
|
information
on the appropriateness of a given action brought for his approval or
performed by him by virtue of his position;
and
|
|
·
|
all
other important information pertaining to the previous
actions.
|
|
·
|
refrain
from any conflict of interest between the performance of his duties in the
company and his personal affairs;
|
|
·
|
refrain
from any activity that is competitive with the
company;
|
|
·
|
refrain
from exploiting any business opportunity of the company to receive a
personal gain for himself or others;
and
|
|
·
|
disclose
to the company any information or documents relating to a company’s
affairs which the office holder has received due to his position as an
office holder.
|
|
·
|
not
in the ordinary course of business;
|
|
·
|
not
on market terms; or
|
|
·
|
likely
to have a material impact on the company’s profitability, assets or
liabilities.
|
|
·
|
the
majority of the votes for the approval includes the votes of at least
one-third of the total votes of shareholders who are present at the
meeting and who have no personal interest in the transaction; the votes of
abstaining shareholders shall not be included in the number of the said
total votes; or
|
|
·
|
the
total number of votes against the approval, among the shareholders who are
present at the meeting and who have no personal interest in the
transaction shall not exceed 1% of the aggregate voting rights in the
company.
|
|
·
|
the
majority of shares voted for the election includes at least one-third of
the shares of non-controlling shareholders voted at the meeting (excluding
abstaining votes); or
|
|
·
|
the
total number of shares of non-controlling shareholders voted against the
election of the external director does not exceed one percent of the
aggregate voting rights in the
company.
|
|
·
|
any
amendment to the articles of
association;
|
|
·
|
an
increase of our authorized share
capital;
|
|
·
|
a
merger; or
|
|
·
|
approval
of certain actions and transactions that require shareholder
approval.
|
|
·
|
Deduction
of purchases of know-how and patents over an eight-year period for tax
purposes;
|
|
·
|
Right
to elect, under specified conditions, to file a consolidated tax return
with additional related Israeli Industrial
Companies;
|
|
·
|
Accelerated
depreciation rates on equipment and buildings;
and
|
|
·
|
Deductions
over a three-year period of expenses involved with the issuance and
listing of shares on a stock
market.
|
·
|
Similar
to the currently available alternative route, exemption from corporate tax
on undistributed income for a period of two to ten years, depending on the
geographic location of the Benefited Enterprise within Israel, and a
reduced corporate tax rate of 10% to 25% for the remainder of the benefits
period, depending on the level of foreign investment in each
year. Benefits may be granted for a term of seven to ten years,
depending on the level of foreign investment in the company. If
the company pays a dividend out of income derived from the Benefited
Enterprise during the tax exemption period, such income will be subject to
corporate tax at the applicable rate (10%-25%). The company is required to
withhold tax at the source at a rate of 15% from any dividends distributed
from income derived from the Benefited Enterprise;
and
|
·
|
A
special tax route, which enables companies owning facilities in certain
geographical locations in Israel to pay corporate tax at the rate of 11.5%
on income of the Benefited Enterprise. The benefits period is ten years.
Upon payment of dividends, the company is required to withhold tax at
source at a rate of 15% for Israeli residents and at a rate of 4% for
foreign residents.
|
Year ended December
31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual
|
At
2005
Exchange
rates
(1)
|
Actual
|
At
2006
Exchange
rates
(1)
|
Actual
|
At
2007
Exchange
rates
(1)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
$ | 8,125 | $ | 8,058 | $ | 11,042 | $ | 9,673 | $ | 14,889 | $ | 13,633 |
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Audit
fees (1)
|
$ | 105,000 | $ | 75,000 | ||||
Audit-related
fees
|
18,560 | - | ||||||
Tax
fees (2)
|
10,000 | 15,600 | ||||||
All
other fees (3)
|
- | 750 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 133,560 | $ | 91,350 |
|
·
|
NASDAQ
rules require that the quorum for meetings of a company’s shareholders be
not less than 33 1/3% of the outstanding voting stock of the
company. We have, however, chosen to follow home country
practice with respect to shareholder meeting quorum and our articles of
association provide that the quorum required for any meeting of our
shareholders shall consist of at least two shareholders present, in person
or by proxy, who hold or represent between them at least 25% of the voting
power of our issued share capital.
|
|
·
|
In
November 2007, our Board of Directors authorized an increase of 500,000
ordinary shares for issuance under our Global Share Incentive Plan (2006),
or 2006 Plan. Generally, under NASDAQ’s requirements, such an
increase would require shareholder approval. However, we chose
to follow our home country practice, which does not require shareholder
approval, and did not seek or receive shareholder approval for the
increase in shares under the 2006
Plan.
|
Exhibit Number
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
1.1(5)
|
Second
Amended and Restated Articles of Association, as amended on May 30,
2007.
|
|
2.1(1)
|
Form
of Share Certificate for Ordinary Shares.
|
|
2.2(1)
|
Investor
Rights Agreement dated April 4, 2006.
|
|
2.3*
|
Convertible
Note Agreement, dated as of September 24, 2008, by and among Rosetta
Genomics Ltd. and the entities identified in the Schedule of Investors
thereto and form of Convertible Promissory Notes.
|
|
4.1(1)@
|
Research
Collaboration Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2006, by and between
Rosetta Genomics Ltd., and Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
4.2(1)@
|
License
Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2006, by and between Rosetta Genomics Ltd.
and The Rockefeller University.
|
|
4.3(3)@
|
License
Agreement, dated effective as of May 1, 2007, by and between Rosetta
Genomics Ltd. and The Rockefeller University.
|
|
4.4(1)
|
License
Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2003, by and between Rosetta Genomics Ltd.
and Maimonides Innovative Technologies Ltd.
|
|
4.5(1)
|
Lease
Agreement, dated August 4, 2003, by and between Rosetta Genomics Ltd., as
tenant, and Rorberg Contracting and Investments (1963) Ltd. and Tazor
Development Ltd., as landlords, as amended in April 2004 and as extended
on April 9, 2006 (as translated from Hebrew).
|
|
4.6(5)
|
Lease,
dated December 2, 2007, between 15 Exchange Place Corp. and Rosetta
Genomics Inc.
|
|
4.7*
|
Lease
Agreement from Wexford-UCSC II, L.P. to Rosetta Genomics Inc., dated July
7, 2008, and First Amendment thereto, dated August 11,
2008.
|
|
4.8(1)
|
2003
Israeli Share Option Plan.
|
|
4.9(4)
|
2006
Employee Incentive Plan (Global Share Incentive Plan).
|
|
4.10(1)
|
Form
of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement.
|
|
4.11(1)@
|
License
Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2006, by and between Rosetta Genomics Ltd.
and Max Planck Innovation GmbH.
|
|
4.12(1)@
|
License
Agreement, dated August 2, 2006, by and between The Johns Hopkins
University and Rosetta Genomics Ltd.
|
|
4.13(1)@
|
License
Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2006, by and between Rosetta Genomics
Ltd. and Max Planck Innovation GmbH.
|
|
4.14(1)@
|
Cooperation
and Project Funding Agreement, dated effective as of May 1, 2006, by and
among Rosetta Genomics Ltd., the Israel-United States Binational
Industrial Research and Development Foundation and Isis Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.
|
4.15(5)@
|
License
Agreement, dated effective as of January 8, 2008, by and between
Rosetta Genomics Ltd. and The Rockefeller University.
|
|
4.16*@
|
Exclusive
Testing and Administrative Services Agreement between Rosetta Genomics
Ltd. And Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., dated December 24,
2008
|
|
4.17*@
|
License
Agreement by and between Prometheus Laboratories Inc. and Rosetta Genomics
Ltd., dated April 10, 2009.
|
|
4.18*@
|
Laboratory
Services Agreement, effective as of April 10, 2009, by and between
Prometheus Laboratories Inc. and Rosetta Genomics Ltd.
|
|
4.19(6)
|
Stock
Purchase Agreement by and between Prometheus Laboratories Inc. and Rosetta
Genomics Ltd., dated April 10, 2009.
|
|
4.20*
|
Stock
Purchase Agreement by and among Rosetta Genomics Ltd., Rosetta Genomics
Inc., Parkway Clinical Laboratories, Inc. and Dr. Raza Bokhari, dated July
22, 2008.
|
|
4.21*
|
Stock
Purchase Agreement by and among Sanra Laboratories, LLC, Parkway Clinical
Laboratories, Inc. and Rosetta Genomics Inc., dated May 15,
2009.
|
|
8.1(1)
|
Subsidiaries.
|
|
12.1*
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule
15d-14(a).
|
|
12.2*
|
Certification
of Principal Accounting and Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b)
or Rule 15d-14(b).
|
|
13.1*
|
Certification
of the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Accounting and
Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
15.1*
|
|
Consent
of Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, a member of Ernst & Young
Global.
|
(1)
|
Incorporated
by reference from the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form F-1
(Reg. No. 333-137095), initially filed with the SEC on September 1,
2006.
|
(2)
|
Incorporated
by reference from the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2006 (Reg. No. 001-33042), filed with the SEC on May
21, 2007.
|
(3)
|
Incorporated
by reference from the Registrant’s Form 6-K dated August 2, 2007 (Reg. No.
001-33042), filed with the SEC on August 3,
2007.
|
(4)
|
Incorporated
by reference from the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Reg. No. 333-147805), filed with the SEC on December 3,
2007.
|
(5)
|
Incorporated
by reference from the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2007 (Reg. No. 001-33042), filed with the SEC on June
26, 2008.
|
(6)
|
Incorporated
by reference from the Registrant’s Form 6-K dated April 2009 (Reg. No.
001-33042), filed with the SEC on April 14,
2009.
|
*
|
Filed
herewith.
|
@
|
Confidential
portions of these documents have been filed separately with the SEC
pursuant to a request for confidential
treatment.
|
ROSETTA
GENOMICS LTD.
|
||
Dated:
June 30, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Amir Avniel
|
Amir
Avniel, Chief Executive Officer and
|
||
President
|
Page
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-2
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
F-3
- F-4
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
F-5
|
Statements
of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (Deficiency)
|
F-6
- F-9
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
F-10
- F-11
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-12
- F-44
|
/s/
KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
|
|
Tel-Aviv,
Israel
|
KOST
FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
|
June
11, 2009
|
A
Member of Ernst & Young Global
|
December
31,
|
|||||||||||
Note
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
|||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 14,454 | $ | 13,590 | |||||||
Short-term
bank deposit
|
4
|
840 | 112 | ||||||||
Marketable
securities
|
5
|
426 | 8,251 | ||||||||
Trade
receivables, net
|
502 | - | |||||||||
Other
accounts receivable and prepaid expenses
|
335 | 297 | |||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Total
current assets
|
16,557 | 22,250 | |||||||||
LONG-TERM
INVESTMENT
|
6
|
- | 2,391 | ||||||||
SEVERANCE
PAY FUND
|
131 | 144 | |||||||||
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
7
|
1,301 | 1,253 | ||||||||
OTHER
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
8
|
251 | - | ||||||||
GOODWILL
|
9
|
1,905 | - | ||||||||
3,588 | 3,788 | ||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 20,145 | $ | 26,038 |
December
31,
|
|||||||||||
Note
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|||||||||||
Short-term
bank loan, current maturities of capital lease and long-term bank
loan
|
12a
|
$ | 81 | $ | 247 | ||||||
Trade
payables
|
1,030 | 516 | |||||||||
Other
accounts payable and accruals
|
10
|
1,387 | 1,102 | ||||||||
Total
current
liabilities
|
2,498 | 1,865 | |||||||||
LONG-TERM
LIABILITIES:
|
|||||||||||
Long-term
bank loan and capital lease
|
12a
|
49 | 16 | ||||||||
Convertible
loan
|
11
|
750 | - | ||||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
228 | 228 | |||||||||
Accrued
severance pay
|
520 | 324 | |||||||||
Total
long-term
liabilities
|
1,547 | 568 | |||||||||
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
|
12
|
||||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY :
|
|||||||||||
Share
capital:
|
13
|
||||||||||
Ordinary
shares of NIS 0.01 par value: 17,578,370 shares authorized at
December 31, 2008 and 2007; 12,367,303 and 12,106,115 shares issued
at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and 12,171,932 and
11,910,744 shares outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively
|
34 | 27 | |||||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
61,018 | 58,984 | |||||||||
Other
comprehensive income
|
3 | 86 | |||||||||
Deficit
accumulated during the development stage
|
(44,955 | ) | (35,492 | ) | |||||||
Total
shareholders' equity
|
16,100 | 23,605 | |||||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$ | 20,145 | $ | 26,038 |
Year
ended December 31,
|
Period
from March 9, 2000 (date of inception) through
December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
Note
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 1,511 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,511 | |||||||||||
Cost
of revenues
|
774 | - | - | 774 | |||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
737 | - | - | 737 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Research
and development, net
|
8,705 | 6,400 | 4,781 | 28,204 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing
and business development
|
2,368 | 1,742 | 1,504 | 6,909 | |||||||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
3,703 | 2,903 | 1,860 | 11,040 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill
impairment
|
850 | - | - | 850 | |||||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
15,626 | 11,045 | 8,145 | 47,003 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
14,889 | 11,045 | 8,145 | 46,266 | |||||||||||||||
Financial
expenses (income), net
|
15
|
(5,449 | ) | 3,616 | (538 | ) | (1,334 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss
before taxes on income
|
9,440 | 14,661 | 7,607 | 44,932 | |||||||||||||||
Taxes
on income
|
14
|
23 | - | - | 23 | ||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | 9,463 | $ | 14,661 | $ | 7,607 | $ | 44,955 | |||||||||||
Basic
and diluted net loss per Ordinary share
|
$ | 0.79 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 2.98 | |||||||||||||
Weighted
average number of Ordinary shares used to compute basic and diluted net
loss per Ordinary share
|
12,038,295 | 11,142,149 | 2,551,860 |
Number
of Ordinary shares
|
Number
of Preferred shares
|
Number of
Ordinary A shares
|
Share
capital
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
Receipts
on account of shares
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
Deferred
stock compensation
|
Deficit
accumulated during the development
stage
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of March 9, 2000 (date of inception)
|
- | - | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares, net
|
2,522,496 | - | - | 6 | 34 | - | - | - | - | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (145 | ) | (145 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2000
|
2,522,496 | - | - | 6 | 34 | - | - | - | (145 | ) | (105 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares, net in July-December 2001
|
38,421 | - | - | *) - | 153 | - | - | - | - | 153 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
shares
|
(195,371 | ) | - | - | *) - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (367 | ) | (367 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2001
|
2,365,546 | - | - | 6 | 187 | - | - | - | (512 | ) | (319 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
10,184 | - | - | *) - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred
stock compensation
|
- | - | - | - | 196 | - | - | (196 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of deferred stock compensation
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 72 | - | 72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture
of options granted to employees
|
- | - | - | - | (6 | ) | - | - | 6 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (1,582 | ) | (1,582 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2002
|
2,375,730 | - | - | 6 | 377 | - | - | (118 | ) | (2,094 | ) | (1,829 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of series A Preferred shares, net in July 2003
|
- | 535,084 | - | 1 | 2,652 | - | - | - | - | 2,653 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of convertible loan to series A Preferred shares in October
2003
|
- | 621,835 | - | 2 | 2,689 | - | - | - | - | 2,691 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of warrants to series A Preferred shares
|
- | 180,850 | - | *) - | 660 | - | - | - | - | 660 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
37,816 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred
stock compensation
|
- | - | - | - | 174 | - | - | (174 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of deferred stock compensation
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 177 | - | 177 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture
of options granted to employees
|
- | - | - | - | (22 | ) | - | - | 22 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses
related to warrants granted to non-employees
|
- | - | - | - | 194 | - | - | - | - | 194 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (2,305 | ) | (2,305 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2003
|
2,413,546 | 1,337,769 | - | 9 | 6,724 | - | - | (93 | ) | (4,399 | ) | 2,241 |
Number
of Ordinary shares
|
Number
of Preferred shares
|
Number of
Ordinary A shares
|
Share
capital
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
Receipts
on account of shares
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
Deferred
stock compensation
|
Deficit
accumulated during the development stage
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2003
|
2,413,546 | 1,337,769 | - | 9 | 6,724 | - | - | (93 | ) | (4,399 | ) | 2,241 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of series B Preferred shares, net in September 2004
|
- | 265,747 | - | 1 | 1,394 | - | - | - | - | 1,395 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of Ordinary shares in May 2004
|
56,914 | - | - | *) - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
17,033 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred
stock compensation
|
- | - | - | - | 239 | - | - | (239 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of deferred stock compensation
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 92 | - | 92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture
of options granted to employees
|
- | - | - | - | (25 | ) | - | - | 25 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Receipts
on account of shares
|
- | - | - | - | - | 493 | - | - | - | 493 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses
related to shares and warrants granted to non-employees
|
- | - | - | - | 52 | - | - | - | - | 52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (2,982 | ) | (2,982 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2004
|
2,487,493 | 1,603,516 | - | 10 | 8,384 | 493 | - | (215 | ) | (7,381 | ) | 1,291 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of series B Preferred shares, net in February 2005
|
- | 392,087 | - | 1 | 2,164 | (493 | ) | - | - | - | 1,672 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of shareholders loan to series B Preferred shares
|
- | 20,802 | - | *) - | 122 | - | - | - | - | 122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
55,394 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred
stock compensation
|
- | - | - | - | 32 | - | - | (32 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of deferred stock compensation
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 124 | - | 124 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture
of options granted to employees
|
- | - | - | - | (16 | ) | - | - | 16 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost
related to shares and warrants granted to non-employees
|
- | - | - | - | 161 | - | - | - | - | 161 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost
related to warrants granted as finders' fee
|
- | - | - | - | 138 | - | - | - | - | 138 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses
related to accelerations of vesting of stock options
|
- | - | - | - | 12 | - | - | - | - | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (5,843 | ) | (5,843 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2005
|
2,542,887 | 2,016,405 | - | 11 | 10,997 | - | - | (107 | ) | (13,224 | ) | (2,323 | ) |
Number
of Ordinary shares
|
Number
of Preferred shares
|
Number of
Ordinary A shares
|
Share
capital
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
Deferred
stock
compensation
|
Deficit
accumulated during the development stage
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2005
|
2,542,887 | 2,016,405 | - | 11 | 10,997 | - | (107 | ) | (13,224 | ) | (2,323 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of convertible loan into series B Preferred shares
|
- | 1,033,382 | - | 2 | 6,228 | - | - | - | 6,230 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of series C Preferred shares, net
|
- | 1,822,422 | - | 4 | 13,292 | - | - | - | 13,296 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of warrants to purchase series B Preferred shares in April
2006
|
- | 76,395 | - | *) - | 447 | - | - | - | 447 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
11,148 | - | - | *) - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of deferred stock compensation
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 59 | - | 59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares to non-employee
|
9,240 | - | - | *) - | 61 | - | - | - | 61 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain from marketable securities
|
- | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation
of restricted Ordinary shares
|
(1,581 | ) | - | - | *) - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation
related to shares and warrants granted to non-employees
|
- | - | - | - | 177 | - | - | - | 177 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation to employees
|
- | - | - | - | 756 | - | - | - | 756 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | (7,607 | ) | (7,607 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2006
|
2,561,694 | 4,948,604 | - | 17 | 31,958 | 3 | (48 | ) | (20,831 | ) | 11,099 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of Ordinary shares
into
Ordinary A shares
|
(2,159,126 | ) | - | 2,159,126 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment
from conversion into Ordinary shares
|
- | 306,962 | (306,962 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
into Ordinary shares in March 2007
|
7,107,730 | (5,255,566 | ) | (1,852,164 | ) | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of Ordinary shares, net of $4,180 issuance cost in March
2007
|
4,312,500 | - | - | 10 | 25,998 | - | - | - | 26,008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
83,999 | - | - | - | 41 | - | - | - | 41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of warrants
|
3,947 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of deferred stock compensation
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 33 | - | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture
of options granted to employees
|
- | - | - | - | (15 | ) | - | 15 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation to non-employees
|
- | - | - | - | 155 | - | - | - | 155 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation to employees
|
- | - | - | - | 847 | - | - | - | 847 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain from hedging activities
|
- | - | - | - | - | 83 | - | - | 83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | (14,661 | ) | (14,661 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2007
|
11,910,744 | - | - | 27 | 58,984 | 86 | - | (35,492 | ) | 23,605 |
Number
of Ordinary shares
|
Number
of Preferred shares
|
Number of
Ordinary A shares
|
Share
capital
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
Deficit
accumulated during the development stage
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2007
|
11,910,744 | - | - | 27 | 58,984 | 86 | (35,492 | ) | 23,605 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
31,527 | - | - | *) - | 33 | - | - | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares in July 2008
|
229,661 | - | - | 7 | 993 | - | - | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation to non-employees
|
- | - | - | - | 70 | - | - | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation to employees
|
- | - | - | - | 938 | - | - | 938 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized
loss from hedging activities
|
- | - | - | - | - | (83 | ) | - | (83 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (9,463 | ) | (9,463 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2008
|
12,171,932 | - | - | $ | 34 | $ | 61,018 | $ | 3 | $ | (44,955 | ) | $ | 16,100 |
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Accumulated
unrealized gains from available-for-sale- marketable securities, net of
taxes
|
$ | 3 | $ | 3 | ||||
Accumulated
unrealized gains from hedging activity
|
- | 83 | ||||||
$ | 3 | $ | 86 |
Year
ended December 31,
|
Period
from March 9, 2000 (date of inception) through
December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Cash flows from
operating activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (9,463 | ) | $ | (14,661 | ) | $ | (7,607 | ) | $ | (44,955 | ) | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
334 | 179 | 161 | 1,119 | ||||||||||||
Amortization
of other intangible assets and impairment of
goodwill
|
936 | - | - | 936 | ||||||||||||
Foreign
currency adjustments
|
(39 | ) | 12 | 4 | (49 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization
of discount on convertible loan
|
- | - | - | 405 | ||||||||||||
Income
related to embedded derivative
|
- | - | - | (236 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest
on short-term bank deposit
|
(5 | ) | - | (149 | ) | (154 | ) | |||||||||
Modification
of convertible loan
|
- | - | - | 360 | ||||||||||||
Capital
loss from sale of property and equipment
|
2 | 4 | 20 | 55 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest on marketable securities
|
(36 | ) | (98 | ) | (14 | ) | (193 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued
severance pay, net
|
209 | (66 | ) | 165 | 389 | |||||||||||
Amortization
of deferred stock compensation
|
- | 33 | 59 | 557 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation to employees
|
938 | 847 | 756 | 2,541 | ||||||||||||
Compensation
related to shares and warrants granted to non-employees
|
70 | 155 | 177 | 947 | ||||||||||||
Cost
related to acceleration of stock options' vesting
|
- | - | - | 12 | ||||||||||||
Decrease
in marketable securities
|
- | - | - | 42 | ||||||||||||
Gain
from sale of marketable securities
|
(5,640 | ) | - | - | (5,640 | ) | ||||||||||
Impairments
of investments in marketable securities
|
631 | 5,009 | - | 5,640 | ||||||||||||
Increase
in trade receivables
|
(233 | ) | - | - | (233 | ) | ||||||||||
Increase
in other accounts receivable and prepaid expenses
|
(62 | ) | (80 | ) | (66 | ) | (276 | ) | ||||||||
Increase
in trade payables
|
221 | 248 | 61 | 925 | ||||||||||||
Increase
in deferred revenue
|
- | - | - | 228 | ||||||||||||
Increase
in other accounts payable and accruals
|
176 | 352 | 19 | 1,081 | ||||||||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(11,961 | ) | (8,066 | ) | (6,414 | ) | (36,499 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flows from
investing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(298 | ) | (975 | ) | (301 | ) | (2,451 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
- | - | 2 | 62 | ||||||||||||
Decrease
(increase) in bank deposits
|
(723 | ) | 5,037 | (5,000 | ) | (686 | ) | |||||||||
Purchase
of marketable securities
|
(8,491 | ) | (68,430 | ) | (750 | ) | (77,671 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of marketable securities
|
23,755 | 53,263 | 381 | 77,399 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition
of Parkway (b)
|
(2,107 | ) | - | - | (2,107 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
12,136 | (11,105 | ) | (5,668 | ) | (5,454 | ) | |||||||||
Cash flows from
financing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Repayment
of capital lease
|
(239 | ) | (70 | ) | (37 | ) | (346 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds
from (repayment of) short-term bank loan
|
25 | - | (72 | ) | 28 | |||||||||||
Receipt
of long-term bank loan and capital lease
|
134 | 261 | 114 | 583 | ||||||||||||
Repayment
of long-term bank loan
|
(14 | ) | (17 | ) | (6 | ) | (109 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds
from convertible loans
|
750 | - | - | 9,142 | ||||||||||||
Shareholders
loans, net
|
- | - | (109 | ) | 148 | |||||||||||
Issuance
of shares, net
|
- | 27,318 | 13,326 | 47,050 | ||||||||||||
Exercise
of warrants and options
|
33 | 41 | 447 | 1,181 | ||||||||||||
Increase
in deferred issuance costs
|
- | - | (1,270 | ) | (1,270 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
689 | 27,533 | 12,393 | 56,407 | ||||||||||||
Increase
in cash and cash equivalents
|
864 | 8,362 | 311 | 14,454 | ||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
13,590 | 5,228 | 4,917 | - | ||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 14,454 | $ | 13,590 | $ | 5,228 | $ | 14,454 |
Year
ended December 31,
|
Period
from March 9, 2000 (date of inception) through
December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||
Supplemental
disclosure:
|
|||||||||||||||||
(a)
|
Non-cash
transactions:
|
||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of convertible loan
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 6,230 | $ | 6,230 | |||||||||
Issuance
of shares in return for Parkway's shares
|
$ | 1,000 | $ | - | $ | 61 | $ | 1,061 | |||||||||
Issuance
expenses - initial public offering
|
$ | - | $ | 40 | $ | 517 | $ | - | |||||||||
(b)
|
Parkway
acquisition:
|
||||||||||||||||
Working
capital (excluding cash)
|
$ | 71 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 71 | |||||||||
Property
& equipment
|
(86 | ) | - | - | (86 | ) | |||||||||||
Backlog
|
(193 | ) | - | - | (193 | ) | |||||||||||
CLIA
certification
|
(144 | ) | - | - | (144 | ) | |||||||||||
Goodwill
|
(2,755 | ) | - | - | (2,755 | ) | |||||||||||
(3,107 | ) | - | - | (3,107 | ) | ||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares
|
1,000 | - | - | 1,000 | |||||||||||||
$ | (2,107 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (2,107 | ) | ||||||||
(c)
|
Cash paid during the
year:
|
||||||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 72 | $ | 36 | $ | 20 | $ | 183 | |||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 3 | $ | 4 | $ | 7 | $ | 20 |
NOTE
1:-
|
GENERAL
|
|
a.
|
Rosetta
Genomics Ltd. (the "Company") commenced operations on March 9, 2000. The
Company develops microRNA-based diagnostic and therapeutic products. The
Company is focused on developing and commercializing these products,
establishing strategic alliances with leading biotechnology and
pharmaceutical companies, and establishing and maintaining a strong
intellectual property position in the microRNA
field.
|
|
b.
|
The
Company holds a wholly-owned subsidiary in the U.S., Rosetta Genomics Inc.
The principal business activity of the subsidiary is to expand the
research, development and the business development of the Company in the
U.S.
|
|
c.
|
On
March 2, 2007, the Company consummated an initial public offering (the
"IPO") on The NASDAQ Global Market and issued an aggregate of 4,312,500
Ordinary shares for net proceeds of $ 26 million (see Note 13a for further
information).
|
|
d.
|
Acquisition
of Parkway Clinical Laboratories, Inc. (“Parkway”)
On
July 22, 2008 ("the closing date"), the Company, through its subsidiary
Rosetta Genomics Inc., acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital
stock of a company in the U.S., Parkway Clinical Laboratories Inc. ("the
Parkway transaction").
Parkway
is a national, full-service Clinical Laboratories Improvement Amendments
("CLIA") certified clinical laboratory service company, which specializes
in oral drug screening in the workplace environment and genetics testing
services. Parkway provides services to correctional facilities, health
systems, rehabilitation centers, corporations and individuals. Parkway
operates a laboratory, for which it bills facilities, third party payers
and individuals on a fee-for-service basis.
The
consideration included (i) $ 1,900 in cash (ii) issuing 229,661 Ordinary
shares of the Company equal in value to $ 1,000 (iii) issuing expenses of
$ 207. In addition the Company will pay $ 200 and issue a number of
Ordinary shares of the Company equal in value to $ 100 if either of the
following milestones is achieved within 12 months following the closing
date: The Company reaches and holds for a period of 30 consecutive days a
market cap of at least $ 100,000, or the consolidated revenues of the
Company and Parkway equal $ 8,000. As of the date of the financial
statements, the Company did not achieve the milestones.
Parkway
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and accordingly, its
results of operations have been included in the consolidated financial
statements since the closing date.
This
acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, in
accordance with SFAS 141, and accordingly, the purchase price was
allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
relative fair values as of the acquisition date, as
follows:
|
Working
capital
|
$ | (71 | ) | |
Property
& equipment, net
|
86 | |||
Intangible
assets
|
||||
Backlog
|
193 | |||
CLIA
certification
|
144 | |||
Goodwill
|
2,755 | |||
Net
assets acquired
|
$ | 3,107 |
NOTE
1:-
|
GENERAL
(Cont.)
|
1.
|
Tangible
assets:
|
2.
|
Backlog:
|
3.
|
CLIA
certification:
|
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||
2008
|
||||
Unaudited
|
||||
Net
revenues
|
$ | 3,161 | ||
Net
loss
|
$ | 9,760 | ||
Basic
and diluted net loss per share
|
$ | 0.8 |
NOTE
1:-
|
GENERAL
(Cont.)
|
|
e.
|
The
Company's accumulated deficit during the development stage totaled $
44,955 for the period from March 9, 2000 (date of inception) to December
31, 2008.
The
Company is in the development stage and, as such, its ability to continue
to operate is dependent on the completion of the development of its
products, the ability to market and sell its products and additional
financing until profitability is
achieved.
|
NOTE
2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
|
a.
|
Use
of estimates:
The
preparation of financial statements, in conformity with U.S. GAAP,
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
|
|
b.
|
Financial
statements in U.S. dollars:
The
Company's financing activities are incurred in U.S. dollars. A portion of
the Company's costs is incurred in U.S. dollars. The Company's management
believes that the U.S. dollar is the primary currency of the economic
environment in which the Company operates. Thus, the functional and
reporting currency of the Company is the U.S. dollar.
Accordingly,
monetary accounts maintained in currencies other than the dollar are
remeasured into U.S. dollars in accordance with Statement No. 52 of the
Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), "Foreign Currency
Translation". All transaction gains and losses from the remeasurement of
monetary balance sheet items are reflected in the statements of operations
as financial income or expenses, as
appropriate.
|
|
c.
|
Principles
of consolidation:
The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned subsidiary. Intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated upon
consolidation.
|
|
d.
|
Cash
equivalents:
Cash
equivalents include short-term highly liquid investments that are readily
convertible to cash with original maturities of three months or less from
time of deposit.
|
|
e.
|
Short-term
bank deposits:
Short-term
bank deposits are deposits with maturities of more than three months but
less than one year. The short-term deposits are presented at their cost.
The accrued interest is included in other receivables and prepaid
expenses.
|
NOTE
2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
f.
|
Marketable
securities:
The
Company accounts for investments in debt and equity securities in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, "Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities" ("SFAS 115").
Management determines the appropriate classification of its investments in
debt and equity securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such
determination at each balance sheet date.
At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, all marketable securities are designated as
available-for-sale. Accordingly, these securities are stated at fair
value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of shareholders' equity,
realized gains and losses on sales of investments, as determined on a
specific identification basis, are included in the consolidated statement
of operations.
FASB
Staff Position ("FSP") No. 115-1, "The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investment" ("FSP 115-1")
provides guidance for determining when an investment is considered
impaired, whether impairment is other-than-temporary, and for measurement
of an impairment loss. An investment is considered impaired if the fair
value of the investment is less than its cost. If, after consideration of
all available evidence to evaluate the realizable value of its investment,
impairment is determined to be other-than-temporary, then an impairment
loss should be recognized equal to the difference between the investment's
cost and its fair value.
As
of December 31, 2007, the Company had $7,400 of principal invested in
Auction Rate Securities (ARS) ranked AAA/Aaa at the time of purchase. All
of these securities retained at least AAA or Aaa rating as of December 31,
2007. All securities continue to pay interest in accordance with their
stated terms as of December 31, 2007. However, since these ARS have
experienced multiple failed auctions due to a lack of liquidity in the
market for these securities, the Company has revalued its ARS portfolio.
As a result, it has recorded an impairment charge of $ 5,009 in its
statement of operation to reflect other than temporary decline in the
value of its investment in ARS. During 2008 the Company recorded an
additional impairment of $ 631 related to the ARS.
During
the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company received $ 7,400 from the
repurchase of the ARS following an unexpected offer to settle the ARS and
recorded gain in the amount of $ 5,640 upon receiving the funds (See
Note 6).
|
|
g.
|
Trade
receivables:
Trade
receivables are reported, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, which is
estimated and recorded in the period the related revenues recorded.
Management provides for probable uncollectible amounts through a provision
for bad debt expense and an adjustment to a valuation allowance based on
its assessment of the current status of individual accounts. Balances that
are still outstanding after management has used reasonable collection
efforts are written-off through a charge to the valuation allowance and a
credit to accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2008 the allowance for
doubtful accounts is $ 5.
|
NOTE
2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
h.
|
Property
and equipment:
Property
and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is calculated by the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets.
The
annual depreciation rates are as
follows:
|
%
|
|
Computer
equipment
|
33
|
Office
furniture and laboratory equipment
|
7 -
15 (mainly 15)
|
Leasehold
improvement
|
Over
the shorter of the lease term or useful economic
life
|
|
i.
|
Intangible
assets:
Intangible
assets acquired in a business combination are recorded at fair value at
the date of acquisition. Following initial recognition, intangible assets
are carried at cost less any accumulated amortization and any accumulated
impairment losses. The useful lives of intangible assets are assessed to
be either finite or indefinite. Intangible assets with finite lives are
amortized over their useful economic life using a method of amortization
that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible
assets are consumed or otherwise used up and are assessed for impairment
whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired.
The amortization period and the amortization method for an intangible
asset with a finite useful life are reviewed at least at each financial
year-end.
The
Company's intangible assets consist of CLIA certification and backlog. The
backlog's estimated useful life is one year; the CLIA certification has
indefinite useful life and therefore, is not subject to amortization, but
rather reviewed for impairment at least annually in accordance with the
provision of SFAS 142.
In
accordance with SFAS 144, The Company's management has assessed whether
there has been an impairment of the Company's intangible assets during
2008. This was undertaken due to certain indicators of impairment such as
a decline in fair value of publicly traded competitive companies the
Company's recent operating results and the determination in 2008 that
intangible assets have been impaired. Impairment is considered to exist if
total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than
the carrying value of the asset or asset group tested for
impairment.
In
performing that test, the Company's management estimated the sum of the
undiscounted future cash-flows, expected to be derived from its asset
group. The Company's management used significant assumptions and
estimates, including but not limited to projected future revenues and cash
flows, growth rates, future gross margins and operating results, future
working capital needs and future capital expenditures, as well as
appropriate discount rates. The assumptions developed by the Company's
management were based upon historical trends and estimates of future
economic conditions.
The
management assisted by a third party valuator in applying the customary
valuation techniques and required economic models. These assumptions may
differ from actual results due to, among other things, technological
change, economic conditions, changes to its business models or changes in
operating performance and an impairment charge may be required in the
future.
|
NOTE
2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
The
analysis showed that the sum of the undiscounted cash-flow derived from
the asset group exceeded its carrying amount and accordingly, the
Company's management concluded that impairment of the intangible assets
with finite useful lives is not required.
|
||
|
j.
|
Goodwill:
Goodwill
is measured as the excess of the cost of an acquired company over the sum
of the amounts assigned to tangible and identifiable intangible assets
acquired less liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized, but rather
reviewed for impairment at least annually in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 142. The goodwill impairment test under SFAS No.
142 involves a two-step approach. Under the first step, the Company
determines the fair value of each reporting unit to which goodwill has
been assigned.
The
reporting units of the Company for purposes of the impairment test are the
Company's two operating segments, the core technology, and laboratory
services, as these are the components of the business for which discrete
financial information is available and segment management regularly
reviews the operating results of those components. The Company then
compares the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value,
including goodwill. The Company estimates the fair value of each reporting
unit by estimating the present value of the reporting unit's future cash
flows. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, no impairment loss is
recognized. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, the goodwill of
the reporting unit is considered potentially impaired and the second step
is completed in order to measure the impairment loss. Under the second
step goodwill is reduced to its implied fair value through an adjustment
to the goodwill balance, resulting in an impairment charge.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company performed an annual assessment
of goodwill impairment as of December 31, 2008 for the laboratory services
segment. This was undertaken due to certain indicators of impairment such
as a decline in fair value of publicly traded competitive companies the
Company's recent operating results and the determination in 2008 that
goodwill have been impaired. The Company performed the impairment analysis
based on estimated discounted future cash flow. As a result of this
analysis, the Company determined that goodwill impairment related to the
laboratory services had occurred and recognized a non-cash impairment
charge of $ 850.
|
|
k.
|
Impairment
of long-lived assets:
The
long-lived assets of the Company and its subsidiaries and all identifiable
intangible assets that are subject to amortization are reviewed for
impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 144 "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets"("SFAS No. 144"), whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison
of the carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted cash flows
expected to be generated by the assets. If such assets are considered to
be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by
which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the
assets. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, no impairment losses have been
identified.
|
NOTE
2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
l.
|
Convertible
notes:
Convertible
notes are accounted for in accordance with the provisions of Emerging
Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 00-19, "Accounting for Derivative
Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company's
Own Stock" ("EITF 00-19"). The Company has also considered Statements of
Financial Accounting Standard No.133, "Accounting for Derivatives,
Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133"), APB 14, "Accounting for
Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants" and EITF
05-2 "The Meaning of "Conventional Convertible Debt Instrument" in Issue
No. 00-19", the Company, where applicable, recorded an embedded derivative
instrument classified as a
liability.
|
|
m.
|
Revenue
recognition:
Revenues
from sales of Rosetta core products are recognized in accordance with
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, "Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements" ("SAB No. 104"), when delivery has occurred, persuasive
evidence of an agreement exists, the vendor's fee is fixed or
determinable, no further obligation exists and collectability is
probable.
To
the extent future obligations are included in a multi-element arrangement;
revenue is recognized upon delivery, provided fair value for the elements
exists. In multi-element arrangements that include future obligations, if
fair value does not exist for all undelivered elements, revenue for the
entire arrangement is deferred until all elements are delivered or when
fair value can be established according to EITF Issue No. 00-21,
"Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables" ("EITF
00-21").
Royalties
from licensing the right to use the Company's products will be recognized
when earned and when written sales confirmation from the licensee is
received and no future obligation exists. Non-refundable, up front
advancements of royalties from licensing the right to use the Company's
products which are fully chargeable against royalties, are recorded as
deferred revenue until the above mentioned criteria for recognizing
revenue are met.
Deferred
revenues represent payments received in advance, where not all revenue
recognition criteria are met. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has
deferred revenue in an amount of $ 228.
Revenues
from laboratory services are recognized, when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the fee is determinable
and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company primarily recognizes
revenue for services rendered upon completion of the testing process.
Billing for services reimbursed by third-party payers are recorded as
revenues net of allowance for differences between amounts billed and the
estimated receipts from such payers. Adjustments to the estimated
receipts, based on final settlement with the third party payers, are
recorded upon settlement. Unbilled receivables are recorded for services
rendered during, but billed subsequent to, the reporting
period.
|
NOTE
2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
n.
|
Research
and development expenses, net:
Research
and development expenses include costs of salaries and related expenses,
activities related to intellectual property, research materials and
supplies and equipment depreciation. All research and development costs
are expensed as incurred. The Company has entered into several license
agreements for rights to utilize certain technologies. The terms of the
licenses may provide for upfront payments, annual maintenance payments and
royalties on product sales. Costs to acquire and maintain licensed
technology that has not reached technological feasibility and does not
have alternative future use are charged to research and development
expense as incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, the Company charged to research and development expense $ 162, $ 253
and $ 453 of costs associated with license fees, respectively. (Note
12e-12j).
Royalty
bearing grants from the Bi-national Industrial Research and Development
Foundation ("BIRD") for funding approved research and development
projects, are presented as a reduction from the research and development
expenses (Note 12k). The Company received grants in an amount of $ 143, $
143 and $ 71, in the years 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
|
|
o.
|
Accounting
for stock-based compensation:
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No.
123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS No. 123(R)"). SFAS No.
123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of equity-based
payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The
value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is
recognized as an expense over the requisite service periods in the
Company's consolidated income statements.
The
Company recognizes compensation expenses for the value of its awards
granted based on the straight line method over the requisite service
period of each of the awards, net of estimated forfeitures. SFAS No.
123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and
revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ
from those estimates. Estimated forfeitures are based on actual historical
pre-vesting forfeitures.
The
Company selected the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model as the most
appropriate fair value method for its stock-options awards and values
restricted stock based on the market value of the underlying shares at the
date of grant. The option-pricing model requires a number of assumptions,
of which the most significant are the expected stock price volatility and
the expected option term.
The
weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted
during the 12 months ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $ 3.14, $
5.12 and $ 5.01, respectively per share using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions (annualized
percentages):
|
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||
Dividend
yield
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
|||
Expected
volatility
|
75%-85%
|
85%-90%
|
90%
|
|||
Risk-free
interest
|
3.53%
|
4.17%
|
4.8%
|
|||
Expected
life
|
6.25
years
|
6.25
years
|
6-6.25
years
|
NOTE
2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
The
Company is required to assume a dividend yield as an input in the
Black-Scholes model. The dividend yield assumption is based on the
Company's historical experience and expectation of future dividend
payouts. The Company has historically not paid dividends and has no
foreseeable plans to pay dividends. The dividend yield used for the twelve
months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was 0%.
The
computation of expected volatility is based on realized historical stock
price volatility of peer data as well as historical volatility of the
Company's stock starting from the IPO date. As a result of the
above-mentioned calculations, the volatility used for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was between 75%-85% and between 85%-90%,
respectively.
The
risk-free interest rate assumption is the implied yield currently
available on United States treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining
term equal to the expected life term of the Company's
options.
The
Company determined the expected life of the options according to the
simplified method, average of vesting and the contractual term of the
Company's stock options.
The
Company applies SFAS No. 123(R) and EITF No. 96-18 "Accounting for Equity
Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring or in
Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services", with respect to options and
warrants issued to non-employees. SFAS No. 123(R) requires the use of
option valuation models to measure the fair value of the options and
warrants at the measurement date.
|
|
p.
|
Net
loss per share:
Basic
earnings per share are computed based on the weighted average number of
Ordinary shares outstanding during each year. Diluted earnings per share
are computed based on the weighted average number of Ordinary shares
outstanding during each year, plus dilutive potential Ordinary shares
considered outstanding during the year, in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share" ("SFAS No.
128").
Basic
and diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted average
number of Ordinary shares outstanding during the period.
For
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, all outstanding options,
warrants and Preferred shares, if any, have been excluded from the
calculation of the diluted net loss per share since their effect was
anti-dilutive.
|
|
q.
|
Income
taxes:
The
Company and its subsidiaries account for income taxes in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for
Income Taxes" ("SFAS No. 109"). This Statement prescribes the use of the
liability method whereby deferred tax assets and liability account
balances are determined based on the differences between financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using
the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences
are expected to reverse.
The
Company and its subsidiaries provide a valuation allowance, if necessary,
to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts that are more likely-than-not
to be realized.
|
NOTE
2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
|
On
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48,
"Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109" (FIN 48). FIN 48 contains a two-step
approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted
for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The first step is to evaluate the tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return by determining if
the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not
that, on an evaluation of the technical merits, the tax position will be
sustained on audit, including resolution of any related appeals or
litigation processes. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the
largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate
settlement.
|
|
r.
|
Severance
pay:
A
majority of the employees are included under section 14 of the Israeli
Severance Compensation Law ("Section 14"). Under Section 14, the Israeli
employees are entitled only to monthly deposits, at a rate of 8.33% of
their monthly salary, made on their behalf with insurance companies.
Payments in accordance with Section 14 release the Israeli subsidiary from
any future severance payments in respect of those employees. Deposits
under Section 14 are not recorded as an asset in the Company's balance
sheet.
For
those Israeli employees who are not included under Section 14, the
liability for severance pay is calculated pursuant to Israel's Severance
Pay Law based on the most recent salary of the employees multiplied by the
number of years of employment, as of the balance sheet date. Employees are
entitled to one month's salary for each year of employment or a portion
thereof. The Israeli subsidiary's liability for all of its employees, is
fully provided by monthly deposits with insurance policies and by an
accrual. The value of these policies is recorded as an asset in the
Company's balance sheet.
The
deposited funds may be withdrawn only upon the fulfillment of the
obligation pursuant to Israel's Severance Pay Law or labor agreements. The
value of the deposited funds is based on the cash surrendered value of
these policies, and includes immaterial profits.
The
Subsidiary’s and Parkway’s employees have a 401(K) defined contribution
plan covering certain employees in the U.S.
Severance
expenses for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $ 478,
$ 171 and $ 333, respectively, and $ 1,292 from March 9, 2000 (date of
inception) through December 31,
2008.
|
|
s.
|
Concentrations
of credit risk:
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of
credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, short term
bank deposits, marketable securities and trade receivables.
As
a result of the recent turmoil in capital markets, the Company has
tightened its control and monitoring over its marketable securities
portfolio in order to minimize potential risks stemming from current
capital markets environment. Such measures included among others: reducing
credit exposure to financial sector securities and increasing the overall
credit quality of the
portfolio.
|
NOTE
2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
As
of December 31, 2008, the Company's marketable securities include an
investment in a U.S. Agency security. Management believes that minimal
credit risk exists with respect to these marketable
securities.
The
Company has no off-balance-sheet concentration of credit risk other than
foreign exchange contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements to hedge
is operating activities.
|
|
t.
|
Fair
value of financial instruments:
The
carrying amounts of our financial instruments, including cash and cash
equivalents, short-term bank deposits, marketable securities, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate fair
value because of their generally short maturities.
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, "Fair Value
Measurements" and, effective October 10, 2008, adopted FSP No. SFAS
157-3, "Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market
for That Asset Is Not Active", except as it applies to the nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities subject to FSP 157-2. SFAS 157
clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a
market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. As
a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS 157 establishes a
three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the
valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:
Level
1 -
Observable
input that reflects quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets.
Level 2
-
Include
other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the
marketplace.
Level 3
-
Unobservable
inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
The
fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when
measuring fair value.
The
following methods were used by the Company and its subsidiaries in
estimating their fair value disclosures for financial
instruments:
1.
The
fair value of short-term marketable securities is based on quoted market
prices.
2.
The
fair value of derivative instruments is estimated by obtaining quotes from
brokers.
|
NOTE
2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
u.
|
Derivative
instruments:
The
Company sometimes uses derivative financial instruments to manage its
exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. The Company accounts
for derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS 133,
"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS No.
133"). Under SFAS No. 133, all derivatives are recorded as either assets
or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet, and periodically
adjusted to fair value. The classification of gains and losses resulting
from changes in the fair value of derivatives is dependent on the intended
use of the derivative and its resulting designation. Adjustments to
reflect changes in fair of values of derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments are reflected in earnings. For derivative instruments that are
designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the
gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of
other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same line
item associated with the forecasted transaction in the same period during
which the hedge transaction affects earnings.
During
2008, the Company recognized income from derivative instruments of
$ 182, which was offset against the payroll expenses in the statement
of income and recorded financial expenses from derivative instruments of
$ 87. As of December 31, 2008 the Company has no unrecognized income
from derivative instruments.
|
|
v.
|
Reclassification:
Certain
comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation.
|
|
w.
|
Impact
of recently issued Accounting
Standards:
|
|
1.
|
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-1, "Application of
FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other
Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for
Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13", and
FSP No. FAS 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157".
Collectively, the Staff Positions defer the effective date of Statement
157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis at least
annually, and amend the scope of Statement 157. As described in
Note 2(r), the Company adopted Statement 157 and the related FASB
staff positions except for those items specifically deferred under FSP
No. FAS 157-2.
|
|
2.
|
In
March 2008, the FASB issued Statement 161 "Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 161") an amendment to FASB No.
133. This statement changes the disclosure requirements for
derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are
required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why and entity
uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related
interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged
items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. This statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008. The Company does not expect the
adoption of SFAS 161 to have a material impact on its financial position,
results of operations or cash
flows.
|
NOTE
2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
3.
|
In
November 2007, the EITF issued EITF Issue No. 07-1, Accounting for
Collaborative Arrangements Related to the Development and
Commercialization of Intellectual Property.
Companies
may enter into arrangements with other companies to jointly develop,
manufacture, distribute, and market a product. Often the activities
associated with these arrangements are conducted by the collaborators
without the creation of a separate legal entity (that is, the arrangement
is operated as a "virtual joint venture"). The arrangements generally
provide that the collaborators will share, based on contractually defined
calculations, the profits or losses from the associated activities.
Periodically, the collaborators share financial information related to
product revenues generated (if any) and costs incurred that may trigger a
sharing payment for the combined profits or losses. The consensus requires
collaborators in such an arrangement to present the result of activities
for which they act as the principal on a gross basis and report any
payments received from (made to) other collaborators based on other
applicable GAAP or, in the absence of other applicable GAAP, based on
analogy to authoritative accounting literature or a reasonable, rational,
and consistently applied accounting policy election.
EITF
07-1 is effective for collaborative arrangements in place at the beginning
of the annual period beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of EITF 07-1 could have
on the Company's financial
statement.
|
|
4.
|
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), ''Business Combinations''
(''SFAS 141(R)''). This Statement replaces SFAS No. 141, ''Business
Combinations'', and requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired,
the liabilities assumed, including those arising from contractual
contingencies, any contingent consideration and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair
values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in the
statement. SFAS 141(R) also requires the acquirer in a business
combination achieved in stages (sometimes referred to as a step
acquisition) to recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well
as the noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, at the full amounts of
their fair values (or other amounts determined in accordance with SFAS
141(R)). In addition, SFAS 141(R)'s requirement to measure the
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at fair value will result in
recognizing the goodwill attributable to the noncontrolling interest in
addition to that attributable to the acquirer.
SFAS
141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. As
such, the adoption of SFAS 141(R) is not expected to have a material
effect on accounting for our current
subsidiaries.
|
NOTE
2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
5.
|
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, ''Non-controlling Interests
in Consolidated Financial Statements'' (''SFAS 160''). SFAS 160 amends ARB
51, ''Consolidated Financial Statements'', to establish accounting and
reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It also clarifies that a
non-controlling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the
consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated
financial statements. SFAS 160 also changes the way the consolidated
income statement is presented by requiring consolidated net income to be
reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the
parent and the non-controlling interest. It also requires disclosure, on
the face of the consolidated statement of income, of the amounts of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
non-controlling interest. SFAS 160 requires that a parent recognize a gain
or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated and requires
expanded disclosures in the consolidated financial statements that clearly
identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent owners and
the interests of the non-controlling owners of a subsidiary.
SFAS
160 is effective for fiscal periods, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The
adoption of SFAS 160 is not expected to have a material effect on
accounting for current
subsidiaries.
|
NOTE
3: -
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASURMENTS
|
Fair value measurements using
input type
|
||||||||||||||||
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Marketable
securities
|
$ | - | $ | 426 | $ | - | $ | 426 | ||||||||
Total
Assets
|
- | 426 | - | 426 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Convertible
loan
|
- | - | 750 | 750 | ||||||||||||
Foreign
currency derivative contracts
|
- | 65 | - | 65 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
$ | - | $ | 65 | $ | 750 | $ | 815 |
NOTE
4:-
|
SHORT-TERM
BANK DEPOSIT
|
Amount
|
Maturity
date
|
Interest
|
||
$
723
|
March 2,
2009
|
2%
|
||
$
117
|
December
3, 2009
|
2.25%
|
NOTE
5:-
|
MARKETABLE
SECURITIES
|
Cost
|
Unrealized
gains
|
Market
value
|
||||||||||
Available-for-sale:
|
||||||||||||
December
31, 2008:
|
||||||||||||
U.S.
Government Securities
|
$ | 423 | $ | 3 | $ | 426 | ||||||
December
31, 2007:
|
||||||||||||
U.S.
Government and Agencies Securities
|
$ | 8,248 | $ | 3 | $ | 8,251 |
|
Proceeds
from maturity and sales of available-for-sale securities during 2008 were
$ 23,755. Net realized gains from the sales of available-for-sale
securities in the year 2008 are $
62.
|
NOTE
6:-
|
LONG-TERM
INVESTMENT
|
NOTE
6:-
|
LONG-TERM
INVESTMENT (Cont.)
|
Cost
|
Other
than temporary impairment
|
Market
value
|
||||||||||
December
31, 2008:
|
||||||||||||
Total
available-for-sale marketable securities
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
December
31, 2007:
|
||||||||||||
Total
available-for-sale marketable securities
|
$ | 7,400 | $ | 5,009 | $ | 2,391 |
NOTE
7:-
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Cost:
|
||||||||
Computer
equipment
|
$ | 459 | $ | 383 | ||||
Office
furniture and laboratory equipment
|
1,384 | 1,144 | ||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
288 | 230 | ||||||
2,131 | 1,757 | |||||||
Accumulated
depreciation:
|
||||||||
Computer
equipment
|
333 | 273 | ||||||
Office
furniture and laboratory equipment
|
407 | 197 | ||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
90 | 34 | ||||||
830 | 504 | |||||||
Depreciated
cost
|
$ | 1,301 | $ | 1,253 |
NOTE
8:-
|
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
|
|
a.
|
Comprised
as follows:
|
December
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Cost:
|
||||||||
CLIA
certification
|
$ | 144 | $ | - | ||||
Backlog
|
193 | - | ||||||
337 | - | |||||||
Accumulated
amortization:
|
||||||||
CLIA
certification
|
- | - | ||||||
Backlog
|
86 | - | ||||||
86 | - | |||||||
Amortized
cost
|
$ | 251 | $ | - |
|
b.
|
Amortization
expense amounted to $ 86 for the year ended December 31,
2008.
|
|
c.
|
Estimated
amortization expenses for the year 2009 are $ 107, (see also Note
18b).
|
NOTE
9:-
|
GOODWILL
|
December
31,
|
||||
2008
|
||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2007
|
- | |||
Acquisition
of Parkway
|
2,755 | |||
Goodwill
impairment
|
(850 | ) | ||
Balance
as of December 31, 2008
|
$ | 1,905 |
NOTE
10:-
|
OTHER
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUALS
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Employees
salary and payroll accruals
|
$ | 739 | $ | 942 | ||||
Accrued
expenses and other
|
485 | 118 | ||||||
Deferred
revenues and advances from customers
|
163 | 42 | ||||||
$ | 1,387 | $ | 1,102 |
NOTE
11:-
|
CONVERTIBLE
LOANS
|
NOTE
12: -
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
|
|
a.
|
Capital
lease and operating lease:
During
2008 and 2007, the Company leased laboratory equipment and computer
equipment under several capital and operating lease agreements in a total
amount of $ 351, $ 400 respectively, to be paid in 10 to 60 monthly
payments.
The
commitments under the lease and loan agreements are as
follows:
|
December 31,
2008
|
||||
Due
until December 31, 2009
|
$ | 157 | ||
Due
until December 31, 2010
|
63 | |||
Due
until December 31, 2011
|
9 | |||
|
||||
$ | 229 |
NOTE
12: -
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)
|
|
b.
|
The
facilities and motor vehicles of the Company are rented under operating
leases. Aggregate minimum rental commitments under the non-cancelable rent
and lease agreements as of December 31, 2008 are as
follows:
|
2009
|
$ | 828 | ||
2010
|
687 | |||
2011
|
394 | |||
2012
|
372 | |||
2013
|
246 | |||
Total
|
$ | 2,527 |
|
Total
rent and lease expenses for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, were $ 641, $ 333 and $ 287, respectively, and $ 1,486 for the
period from March 9, 2000, (date of inception) through December 31,
2008.
|
|
c.
|
As
of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company provided a bank guarantee for
the fulfillment of its lease commitments in the amount of approximately $
137 and $ 112, respectively.
As
of December 31, 2008, the bank restricted $ 45 of the Company's deposit,
against a loan the Company received from the
bank.
|
|
d.
|
In
June 2003, the Company entered into a license agreement with a related
party to use its intellectual property for a period of 20 years in
consideration of up to $ 100. According to the agreement, the Company is
obligated to pay an aggregate consideration of up to $ 100, of which
$ 20 was paid in cash and $ 80 shall be paid as quarterly royalties
equal to 5% of the net income of the Company resulting from this
agreement.
|
|
e.
|
In
May 2006, the Company signed a royalty-bearing, co-exclusive, worldwide
license agreement with a third party. Under this agreement, the Company
was granted the right to make, use and sell the third party's proprietary
microRNAs for diagnostic purposes including a limited right to sublicense.
In consideration for this license the Company paid an initiation fee and
will pay a fixed annual license maintenance fee, royalties based on net
sales and a percentage of the Company's revenues from any sublicense. The
Company estimates that the minimum aggregate license maintenance fees over
the term of this agreement will be approximately $ 840 until 2029. During
the years ended December, 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company paid fees
in the amount of $ 40, $ 72 and $ 83, respectively, to the third party.
The Company recorded the payments as research and development expenses
since the licensed technology has not reached technological feasibility
and does not have alternative future
use.
|
|
f.
|
In
June 2006, the Company signed a royalty-bearing, co-exclusive, worldwide
license agreement with a third party. Under this agreement, the Company
licensed from this third party the rights to its proprietary microRNAs for
diagnostic purposes. In consideration for this license the Company paid an
initiation fee and will pay a fixed annual license maintenance fee,
royalties based on net sales and a percentage of the Company's revenue
from any sublicense. The Company estimates that the
minimum aggregate license maintenance fees over the term of this agreement
will be approximately $ 543 until 2022. During the year ended
December 31, 2006, the Company paid fees in the amount of $ 219, to
the third party.
No
payments in respect to this agreement were made during the years 2007 and
2008. The Company recorded the payments as research and development
expenses since the licensed technology has not reached technological
feasibility and does not have alternative future
use.
|
NOTE
12:-
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)
|
|
g.
|
In
August 2006, the Company signed a royalty-bearing, exclusive, worldwide
license agreement with a third party. Under this agreement, the Company
has exclusively licensed from this third party the rights to its
proprietary microRNAs for all fields and applications including a limited
right to sublicense. In consideration for this license the Company paid an
initiation fee and will pay minimum annual royalties, royalties based on
net sales and a percentage of the Company's revenues from any sublicense.
The Company estimates that the aggregate minimum royalties over the term
of this agreement will be approximately $ 2,250 until 2032. During the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company paid fees in the
amount of $ 15, $ 43 and $ 125, respectively to the third party. The
Company recorded the payments as research and development expenses since
the licensed technology has not reached technological feasibility and does
not have alternative future use.
|
|
h.
|
In
December 2006, the Company signed a royalty-bearing, non-exclusive,
worldwide license agreement with a third party. Under this agreement the
Company licensed from the third party its proprietary microRNAs for
research purposes. In consideration for this license the Company will pay
an initiation fee and will be required to pay a fixed annual license
maintenance fee, royalties based on net sales and a percentage of the
Company's revenues from any sublicenses. The Company estimates that the
minimum aggregate license maintenance fees over the term of this agreement
will be approximately $ 293 until 2022. During the years ended December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company paid the third party an aggregate of
$ 22, $ 20 and $ 26, respectively under this agreement. The Company
recorded the payments as research and development expenses since the
licensed technology has not reached technological feasibility and does not
have alternative future use.
|
|
i.
|
In
May 2007, the Company signed a royalty-bearing, co-exclusive, worldwide
license agreement with a third party. Under this agreement, the Company
has licensed from this third party the rights to its proprietary microRNAs
for therapeutic purposes including a limited right to sublicense. In
consideration for this license the Company paid an initiation fee and will
pay a fixed annual license maintenance fee, payments based on milestones
and royalties based on net sales and a percentage of the Company's
revenues from any sublicense. The Company estimates that the minimum
aggregate maintenance fees over the term of this agreement will be
approximately $ 630 until 2029. During the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, the Company paid fees in the amount of $ 51 and $ 118,
respectively, to the third party. The Company recorded the payments as
research and development expenses since the licensed technology has not
reached technological feasibility and does not have alternative future
use.
|
|
j.
|
In
January 2008, the Company signed a royalty-bearing, co-exclusive,
worldwide license agreement with a third party. Under this agreement, the
Company was granted the right to make, use and sell the third party's
proprietary microRNAs for research purposes including a limited right to
sublicense. In consideration for this license the Company paid an
initiation fee and will pay a fixed annual license maintenance fee,
royalties based on net sales and a percentage of the Company's revenues
from any sublicense. The Company estimates that the minimum aggregate
license maintenance fees over the term of this agreement will be
approximately $ 420 until 2029. During the year ended December, 31, 2008,
the Company paid initiation fees in the amount of $ 40, to the third
party. The Company recorded the payments as research and development
expenses since the licensed technology has not reached technological
feasibility and does not have alternative future
use.
|
NOTE
12:-
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)
|
|
k.
|
Under
the BIRD royalty-bearing program, the Company is not obligated to repay
any amounts received from BIRD if the development work being carried out
by the Company does not continue beyond the investigational new drug
("IND") stage. If the development works which is being carried out by the
Company continues beyond the IND stage, the Company is required to repay
BIRD 100% of the grant that the Company received provided that the
repayment to BIRD is made within the first year following project
completion. For every year that the Company does not make these
repayments, the amount to be repaid incrementally increases up to 150% in
the fifth year following project completion. All amounts to be repaid to
BIRD are linked to the U.S. consumer price Index.
As
of December 31, 2008, the Company had received $ 357 from BIRD, which was
offset against research and development expenses. As of December, 31 2008
no liability was recorded since the Company did not reach technological
feasibility for this project.
|
NOTE
13:-
|
SHARE
CAPITAL
|
|
a.
|
Initial
public offering:
On
March 2, 2007, the Company completed the initial public offering (the
"IPO") of its Ordinary shares. The IPO consisted of the sale of 4,312,500
Ordinary shares at a price of $ 7.00 per share, including 562,500
shares pursuant to the exercise of the over-allotment option granted by
the Company to the underwriters. Net proceeds from the initial public
offering were $ 26 million. In addition, upon completion of the IPO,
all outstanding Preferred shares were converted into 7,107,730 Ordinary
shares.
|
|
b.
|
Reverse
stock split:
On
August 31, 2006, the Company's Board of Directors approved, subject to
shareholder approval which occurred on September 3, 2006, a 1-for-3.9822
reverse stock split and, accordingly, all shares, options, warrants and
earnings (losses) per share amounts have been retroactively adjusted for
all periods presented to reflect this reverse stock split. On
September 3, 2006, the shareholders also approved a recapitalization
of the Company's authorized share capital so that each share has a par
value of NIS 0.01. The reverse stock split and the recapitalization became
effective on October 4, 2006.
|
|
c.
|
Ordinary
shares:
Ordinary
shares confer upon the holders the right to receive notice to participate
and vote in the general meetings of the Company, the right to receive
dividends, if declared.
In
March 2007 all the Preferred shares were converted into Ordinary shares by
dividing the applicable original issue price of such Preferred share by
the applicable conversion price of such Preferred share, as defined in the
Amended and Restated Articles of Association of the Company. The original
issue prices of series A Preferred shares are $ 3.65, $ 4.08 and $ 5.29,
of series B Preferred shares is $ 5.86 and of series C Preferred shares is
$ 7.68. The initial conversion price of each of the series A, B and C
Preferred shares is identical to the original issue price of such series,
and is subject to adjustment for stock splits and other reclassifications
and will also be adjusted in accordance with the standard weighted-average
anti-dilution provisions contained in the Company's Amended and Restated
Articles of Association in the event of a subsequent issuance of
securities, subject to certain exceptions, at a price per share less than
the applicable original issue price. The conversion ratio for each
Preferred share was 1:1.
|
NOTE
13:-
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Cont.)
|
|
d.
|
Investment
agreements:
|
|
1.
|
During
2000, the Company signed investment agreements and issued 2,522,496
Ordinary shares to investors and founders, in consideration of $ 40. The
Company repurchased 195,371 of those shares and holds it as treasury
shares.
|
|
2.
|
During
2001, the Company signed investment agreements and issued 38,421 Ordinary
shares in consideration of
$ 153.
|
|
3.
|
In
July 2003, the Company signed an investment agreement with existing and
new investors, pursuant to which the Company issued 535,084 Preferred A
shares, at a price per share of $ 5.29, for consideration of $ 2,653, net
of issuance expenses of $ 177.
|
|
4.
|
In
October 2003, the Company issued 457,952 Preferred A shares at a price per
share of $ 3.65 upon conversion of a convertible loan made available
in 2002, and an additional 180,850 Preferred A shares were issued to the
lenders of the loan upon exercise of warrants.
In
addition, 163,883 Preferred A shares were issued upon conversion of a
convertible loan received by the Company in March 2003 at a price per
share of $ 4.08.
|
|
5.
|
In
May 2004, the Company issued 56,914 restricted Ordinary shares to four of
its board members at no consideration, to be held by a trustee. Each
director is entitled to 1/36 of the shares for each month starting
September 2003, in which he serves as a board member. In the event that a
board member ceases to serve as a board member prior to the end of three
years, the shares will remain with the trustee. As of December 31, 2007,
two of those board members still serve as directors. Compensation expenses
related to this grant amounted to $ 49 for the year ended December
31, 2006. No compensation expenses related to this grant were recorded
during 2008 and 2007.
In
May 2006, 1,581 restricted Ordinary shares were
canceled.
|
|
6.
|
In
September 2004, the Company signed an investment agreement with existing
and new investors, pursuant to which the Company issued 265,747 Preferred
B shares, at a price per share of $ 5.86, for total consideration of $
1,395, net of issuance expenses of $ 162.
In
addition, the Company granted the investors warrants to purchase 80,492
Preferred B shares at an exercise price of $ 5.86 per share, exercisable
upon the earlier of June 30, 2006 or the closing of a financing of at
least $ 5,000 at a pre-money valuation of at least
$ 40,000.
76,395
warrants were exercised into Preferred B shares in 2006. The remaining
warrants were cancelled on April 23,
2006.
|
|
7.
|
Pursuant
to the investment agreement signed in September 2004, in February 2005,
the Company issued 392,087 Preferred B shares, for total consideration of
$ 2,165, net of issuance expenses of $ 132. In addition,
$ 122 of the shareholder's loan was converted into 20,802 Preferred B
shares.
|
|
8.
|
On
January 15, 2006 the Company issued 1,033,382 series B Preferred shares at
a price of $ 5.86 from the conversion of 2005 convertible
loan.
|
NOTE
13:-
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Cont.)
|
|
9.
|
In
January 2006, the Company paid a finder's fee of $ 31 by issuing to a
non-employee 5,335 Ordinary shares at a price of $ 5.86 per share, for
services rendered to the Company.
|
|
10.
|
In
March 2006, the board of directors and the shareholders of the Company
approved an increase of 9,668,104 shares to the authorized share capital
and a recapitalization of the authorized share capital of the Company as
follows: The authorized share capital of the Company shall be 17,578,370
shares divided into: (i) 12,304,859 Ordinary shares; (ii) 1,381,158
Preferred A shares; (iii) 1,883,397 Preferred B shares and (iv) 2,008,957
Preferred C shares.
|
|
11.
|
In
April 2006, the Company issued 1,822,422 Preferred C shares at a price per
share of $ 7.68 for gross proceeds of $ 14,000 (the "Series C
Financing").
|
|
12.
|
In
connection with the Series C Financing, the Company paid $30 by issuing
3,905 Ordinary shares at a price of $ 7.68 per
share.
|
|
13.
|
On
March 2, 2007, the Company consummated an initial public offering (the
"IPO") on The NASDAQ Global Market and issued an aggregate of 4,312,500
Ordinary shares at price per share of $ 7 for net proceeds of $ 26
million. (Refer to Note 13a for further
information).
|
|
14.
|
In
July 2008, as a part of the consideration of Parkway's acquisition (see
also Note 1d), the Company issued to Parkway's former sole owner 229,661
Ordinary shares which are equal in value to $ 1,000 based on the weighted-
average closing price of the Company's Ordinary shares during the 10
trading days immediately preceding the date of
issuance.
|
All
of the shares have NIS 0.01 par value as of December 31, 2008 and
2007.
|
|
e.
|
Finders'
fee warrants:
Under
finders' fee agreements, the following warrants are outstanding as of
December 31, 2008:
|
Issuance
date
|
Number
of warrants
|
Exercisable
into
shares
|
Exercise
price
|
Exercisable
through
|
||||||
April 2006
|
33,585 |
Ordinary
|
$ | 7.68 |
April
23, 2009
|
|
The
fair value of the warrants granted was estimated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions;
risk-free interest rates of 4.4%, dividend yields of 0%, volatility
factors of the expected market price of the Company's shares of 90%, and a
weighted-average expected life of the warrants of three
years.
During
2007, 8,432 warrants with expiration date of January 31, 2008, were
exercised using a cashless method, into 3,947 of Ordinary shares.
Additional 25,683 and 39,660 warrants with January 31, 2008 and July 15,
2008, respectively, expiration date, expired on those dates.
33,585
warrants with April 23, 2009 expiration date, were expired on that
date.
|
NOTE
13:-
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Cont.)
|
|
f.
|
Stock
option plans:
|
|
1.
|
During
2001 the Company adopted the 2001 Israeli Share Option Plan (the "2001
Plan"), pursuant to which options may be granted to the Company's
officers, directors, employees and consultants.
Pursuant
to the plan, the Company has reserved a total of 376,679 shares for this
plan and for any other option plans, which may be adopted by the Company
in the future.
In
March 2003, the Company adopted the 2003 Israeli Share Option Plan (the
"2003 Plan"), pursuant to which options may be granted to the Company's
officers, directors, employees and consultants. Pursuant to the plan, the
Company has reserved an additional 188,340 shares for the 2003 Plan and
for any other share option plans that have previously been, or in the
future may be, adopted by the Company.
In
March 2005, the Company's board of directors approved an increase in the
shares available under the 2003 Plan of 401,791 shares to a total of
966,810 shares (including the 376,679 shares reserved under the 2001
Plan).
In
July 2006, the Company adopted the 2006 Israeli Share Option Plan (the
"2006 Plan"), pursuant to which options may be granted to the Company's
officers, directors, employees and consultants. Pursuant to the 2006 Plan,
the Company has reserved an additional 452,024 shares for the 2006 Plan
and for any other share option plans that have previously been, or in the
future may be, adopted by the Company. In November, 2007 the Board of
Directors of the Company approved an additional 500,000 shares for the
2006 plan.
The
total number of options authorized for grant under the plans amounted to
1,918,825. As of December 31, 2008, an aggregate of 199,627 options of the
Company are available for future grants.
Options
granted under the 2001 and 2003 Plans typically vest, as set forth in each
optionee's option agreement, over three years. Options granted under the
2006 Plan typically vest, as set forth in each optionee's option
agreement, over 4 years. All Options are exercisable until ten years from
the grant of the option. Any options which are forfeited or unexercised
become available for future grants. The exercise price equals the share
price on the grant date.
|
|
2.
|
In
September 2005, the Company's Board of Directors approved the acceleration
of vesting of 5,274 unvested options, held by a former employee. As a
result, the Company recorded additional compensation costs of
$ 12.
|
NOTE
13:-
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Cont.)
|
|
3.
|
A
summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information for
the year ended December 31, 2008, is as
follows:
|
Number
of options
|
Weighted-average
exercise price
|
Weighted-
average remaining contractual term (in years)
|
Aggregate
intrinsic value
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2008
|
881,107 | $ | 4.19 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
372,104 | $ | 4.22 | |||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(10,365 | ) | $ | 3.15 | ||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(31,111 | ) | $ | 4.93 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2008
|
1,211,735 | $ | 4.19 | 7.78 | $ | 162 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Vested
or expected to vest
|
1,088,785 | $ | 4.16 | 7.94 | $ | 162 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Exercisable
at December 31, 2008
|
524,163 | $ | 3.55 | 6.94 | $ | 162 |
|
The
weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the
twelve months ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $ 3.14, $ 5.12
and $ 5.01, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above
represents the total intrinsic value (the difference between the fair
market value of the Company Ordinary shares on December 31, 2008 and
the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that
would have been received by the option holders had all option holders
exercised their options on December 31, 2008. This amount changes based on
the fair market value of the Company's shares. Total intrinsic value of
options exercised for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 was $ 22.
As of December 31, 2008, there was $ 1,949 of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation
arrangements granted under the Company's stock option plans. The cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.82
years.
The
following table summarizes information about options to employees
outstanding at December 31, 2008 under the
plans:
|
Exercise
price
|
Options
outstanding at December 31,
2008
|
Weighted
average remaining contractual life (years)
|
Weighted
average exercise price
|
Options
exercisable at December 31, 2008
|
Average
exercise price of options exercisable
|
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 0 | 137,372 | 4.97 | $ | 0 | 137,372 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 2.31-$4.70 | 682,448 | 8.22 | $ | 3.92 | 209,361 | $ | 3.55 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 5.45-$6.59 | 342,851 | 7.98 | $ | 5.87 | 152,277 | $ | 6.00 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 7.098-$8.8 | 49,064 | 8.20 | $ | 7.98 | 25,153 | $ | 8.10 | ||||||||||||||
1,211,735 | 524,163 |
NOTE
13:-
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Cont.)
|
Year
ended December 31
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Research
and development cost
|
$ | 218 | $ | 135 | ||||
Marketing
and business development expenses
|
239 | 225 | ||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
481 | 520 | ||||||
Total
stock-based compensation expense
|
$ | 938 | $ | 880 |
|
g.
|
Options
issued to non-employees:
|
|
1.
|
The
Company's outstanding options to non-employees as of December 31, 2008,
are as follows:
|
Issuance
date
|
Options
for
Ordinary
shares
|
Exercise
price
|
Options
exercisable
|
Exercisable
through
|
|||||||||
April 2002
|
30,864 | $ | - | 30,864 |
April 2012
|
||||||||
May
2002
|
10,288 | $ | - | 10,288 |
May 2012
|
||||||||
July
2002
|
10,288 | $ | - | 10,288 |
July
2012
|
||||||||
September
2002
|
11,651 | $ | 3.65 | 11,651 |
September
2012
|
||||||||
September 2002
|
7,534 | $ | - | 7,323 |
September 2012
|
||||||||
January 2004
|
5,022 | $ | - | 5,233 |
January 2014
|
||||||||
November 2004
|
14,228 | $ | - | 14,228 |
November 2014
|
||||||||
December 2004
|
2,511 | $ | - | 2,511 |
December 2014
|
||||||||
August
2006
|
3,767 | $ | 6.59 | 3,767 |
August
2016
|
||||||||
July
2007
|
38,940 | $ | 7.30 | 12,168 |
July
2017
|
||||||||
July
2007
|
10,000 | $ | 6.84 | 3,124 |
July
2017
|
||||||||
November
2007
|
25,000 | $ | 5.96 | 6,250 |
November
2017
|
||||||||
January
2008
|
15,000 | $ | 5.70 | - |
January
2018
|
||||||||
August
2008
|
25,000 | $ | 3.80 | - |
August
2018
|
||||||||
210,093 | 117,695 |
|
2.
|
The
Company had accounted for its options to non-employees under the fair
value method of SFAS No. 123(R) and EITF 96-18. The fair value of options
granted with an exercise price of $0, was equal to the share price at the
date of grant. The fair value of options granted during 2008 with an
exercise price other than $0 was estimated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
risk-free interest rates of 2.42%, dividend yields of 0%, volatility
factors of the expected market price of the Company's Ordinary shares of
85%, and a weighted-average expected life of the options of 10
years.
|
NOTE
13:-
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Cont.)
|
|
3.
|
The
following table sets forth the total stock-based compensation expense
resulting from stock options granted to non-employees included in the
Company's consolidated statement of
operations:
|
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Research
and development cost
|
$ | 70 | $ | 125 | ||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
- | 30 | ||||||
Total
stock-based compensation expense
|
$ | 70 | $ | 155 |
NOTE
14:-
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
|
a.
|
Measurement
of taxable income under the Income Tax (Inflationary Adjustments) Law,
1985:
Results
for tax purposes in Israel are measured and reflected in real terms in
accordance with the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). As explained
in Note 2b, the consolidated financial statements are presented in
dollars. The differences between the change in the Israeli CPI and in the
NIS/dollar exchange rate causes a difference between taxable income or
loss and the income or loss before taxes reflected in the consolidated
financial statements. In accordance with paragraph 9(f) of SFAS No. 109,
"Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS No. 109"), the Company has not
provided deferred income taxes on this difference between the reporting
currency and the tax bases of assets and liabilities.
According
to the law, until 2007, the results for tax purposes were measured based
on the changes in the Israeli CPI.
In
February 2008, the "Knesset" (Israeli parliament) passed an amendment to
the Income Tax (Inflationary Adjustments) Law, 1985, which limits the
scope of the law starting 2008 and thereafter. Starting 2008, the results
for tax purposes are measured in nominal values, excluding certain
adjustments for changes in the Israeli CPI carried out in the period up to
December 31, 2007. The amendment to the law includes, inter alia, the
elimination of the inflationary additions and deductions and the
additional deduction for depreciation starting
2008.
|
|
b.
|
Tax
benefits under Israel's Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes),
1969 (the "Tax Law"):
The
Company is currently qualified as an "industrial company", as defined by
the Tax Law, and as such, is entitled to certain tax benefits, mainly
amortization of costs relating to know-how and patents over eight years,
the right to claim public issuance expenses over three years, and
accelerated depreciation.
|
NOTE
14:-
|
INCOME
TAXES (Cont.)
|
|
c.
|
Tax
benefits under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959
("the Law"):
The
Company's facilities in Israel have been granted "Approved Enterprise"
status under the Law, and elected the "Alternative Benefits Track". The
main benefit arising from such status is the reduction in tax rates on
income derived from "Approved Enterprises". Consequently, the Company is
entitled to a two-year tax exemption and five years of tax at a reduced
rate (25%). Additionally, if the Company becomes a "foreign investors
company", as defined by the Law, as such it will be entitled to a reduced
tax rate of 10%-25% (based on the percentage of foreign ownership in each
tax year) and an extension of three years for the benefit period. Since
the Company has had no taxable income, the benefits have not yet commenced
for any of the programs.
The
period of tax benefits, detailed above, is subject to a limit of 12 years
from the commencement of production, or 14 years from the approval date,
whichever is earlier. The year's limitation does not apply to the
exemption period.
The
entitlement to the above benefits is conditional upon the Company's
fulfilling the conditions stipulated by the Law, regulations published
thereunder and the letters of approval for the specific investments in
"Approved Enterprises". In the event of failure to comply with these
conditions, the benefits may be canceled and the Company would be required
to refund the amount of tax benefits, plus a consumer price index linkage
adjustment and interest. As of December 31, 2008, management believes that
the Company will be able to meet all of the aforementioned
conditions.
If
these retained tax-exempt profits attributable to the "Approved
Enterprise" are distributed in a manner other than in the complete
liquidation of the Company, they would be taxed at the corporate tax rate
applicable to such profits as if the Company had not elected the
"Alternative Benefits Track", currently between 10%-25% for an "Approved
Enterprise". The Company did not generate income under the provision of
the law.
Income
from sources other than the "Approved Enterprise" during the benefit
period will be subject to tax at the regular corporate tax
rate.
On
April 1, 2005, an amendment to the Investment Law came into effect ("the
Amendment") and has significantly changed the provisions of the Investment
Law. The Amendment limits the scope of enterprises, which may be approved
by the Investment Center by setting criteria for the approval of a
facility as a Beneficiary Enterprise such as provision generally requiring
that at least 25% of the Beneficiary Enterprise's income will be derived
from export. Additionally, the Amendment enacted major changes in the
manner in which tax benefits are awarded under the Investment Law so that
companies no longer require Investment Center approval in order to qualify
for tax benefits.
If
the Company pays a dividend out of income derived from the Benefited
Enterprise during the tax exemption period, such income will be subject to
corporate tax at the applicable rate (10%-25%) in respect of the gross
amount of the dividend that the Company may be distributed. The Company is
required to withhold tax at the source at a rate of 15% from any dividends
distributed from income derived from the Benefited Enterprise. Under the
amendment the benefit period for the Company will extend until the earlier
of (1) seven years from the commencement year or (2) twelve years from the
first day of the year of election. This period may be extended for
Benefited Enterprise owned by a "foreign investor's company" during all or
part of the benefit period.
|
NOTE
14:-
|
INCOME
TAXES (Cont.)
|
|
However, the Amendment provides that terms and benefits
included in any letter of approval already granted will remain subject to
the provisions of the law as they were on the date of such approval.
As
of December 31, 2008, the Company did not generate income under any of the
above-mentioned laws.
|
|
d.
|
Tax
rates applicable to the income of the Company:
Corporate
tax in Israel:
Taxable
income of Israeli companies is subject to tax at the rate of: 31% in 2006,
29% in 2007, 27% in 2008, 26% in 2009 and 25% in 2010 and
thereafter.
Following
an additional amendment to the tax ordinance, which came into effect on
January 1, 2009, an Israeli corporation, may elect a 5% rate of corporate
tax (instead of 25%) for dividends distributions received from a foreign
subsidiary which is used in Israel in 2009, or within one year after
actual receipt of the dividend, whichever is later. The 5% tax rate is
subject to various conditions, which include conditions with regard to the
identity of the corporation that distributes the dividends, the source of
the dividend, the nature of the use of the dividend income, and the period
which the dividend income will be used in
Israel.
|
|
e.
|
Deferred
income taxes:
Deferred
income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between
the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant
components of the Company's deferred tax assets are as
follows:
|
December
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Operating
loss carryforward and deductions
|
$ | 12,551 | $ | 9,022 | ||||
Reserves,
allowances and other
|
85 | 212 | ||||||
Net
deferred tax asset before valuation allowance
|
12,636 | 9,234 | ||||||
Valuation
allowance
|
(12,636 | ) | (9,234 | ) | ||||
Net
deferred tax asset
|
$ | - | $ | - |
|
As
of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company has provided valuation
allowances of $ 12,551 and $ 9,022, respectively, in respect of
deferred tax assets resulting from tax loss carryforward, other temporary
differences and tax withholding. Management currently believes that since
the Company has a history of losses it is more likely than not that the
deferred tax regarding the loss carryforward and the other temporary
differences will not be realized in the foreseeable
future.
|
|
f.
|
The
main reconciling item between the statutory tax rate of the Company and
the effective tax rate is the recognition of valuation allowances in
respect of deferred taxes relating to accumulated net operating losses
carried forward among the various subsidiaries worldwide due to the
uncertainty of the realization of such deferred taxes and the effect of
the "Approved Enterprise".
|
NOTE
14:-
|
INCOME
TAXES (Cont.)
|
|
g.
|
Net
operating losses carryforward:
The
Company has estimated accumulated losses for tax purposes as of December
31, 2008, in the amount of approximately $ 38,743 which may be carried
forward and offset against taxable income in the future for an indefinite
period. The Company's subsidiary in the United States have estimated total
available carry-forward tax losses as of December 31, 2008 of
approximately $ 2,447 to offset against future tax profits for periods of
20 years.
|
|
h.
|
Income
taxes for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
The
Company and its subsidiary in the United States have not recorded any tax
expenses during the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, as the
Company has losses.
Parkway
recorded tax expenses starting on the closing date until December 31, 2008
in the amount of $ 23.
|
|
i.
|
The
Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007, and there
was no effect on the financial statements. As a result, the Company did
not record any cumulative effect related to adopting FIN 48. The Company
did not record a liability deriving from the implementation of FIN
48.
|
NOTE
15:-
|
FINANCIAL
EXPENSES (INCOME)
|
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Financial
income:
|
||||||||||||
Interest
income on short-term deposits
|
$ | 185 | $ | 380 | $ | 486 | ||||||
Foreign
currency adjustments gains
|
- | - | 45 | |||||||||
Interest
and realized gain on marketable securities
|
*) 6,115 | 1,230 | 14 | |||||||||
6,300 | 1,610 | 545 | ||||||||||
Financial
expenses:
|
||||||||||||
Bank
and Interest expenses
|
(109 | ) | (24 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||
Foreign
currency adjustments losses
|
(11 | ) | (50 | ) | - | |||||||
realized
loss on marketable securities
|
(13 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Impairment
of investment in marketable securities
|
(631 | ) | (5,009 | ) | - | |||||||
Loss
related to derivative instruments
|
(87 | ) | (143 | ) | - | |||||||
(851 | ) | (5,226 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||||
$ | 5,449 | $ | (3,616 | ) | $ | 538 |
NOTE
16:-
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
|
a.
|
In
June 2003, the Company entered into a license agreement with a shareholder
of the Company to use its intellectual property for a period of 20 years
for consideration of up to $ 100 (see Note 12d). During the years 2008 and
2007, no expenses were recorded.
|
|
b.
|
In
April 2007, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a related
party for a monthly fee of $ 10. In Addition the Company granted the
consultant 38,940 options at an exercise price of $ 7.3. During 2008 and
2007 the Company paid $ 140 and $ 78, respectively, to this related
party.
|
NOTE
17:-
|
SEGMENTS
OF THE COMPANY AND RELATED
INFORMATION
|
|
a.
|
The
table below presents financial information for the Company's two
reportable segments:
|
Year
ended December 31, 2008
|
||||
Revenues
from external customers:
|
||||
Core
technology
|
$ | - | ||
Laboratory
services
|
1,511 | |||
Consolidated
revenues
|
$ | 1,511 | ||
Gross
profit:
|
||||
Core
technology
|
$ | - | ||
Laboratory
services
|
737 | |||
Consolidated
gross profit
|
$ | 737 | ||
Operating
loss:
|
||||
Core
technology
|
$ | 14,070 | ||
Laboratory
services
|
819 | |||
Consolidated
operating loss
|
$ | 14,889 | ||
Depreciation
and amortization:
|
||||
Core
technology
|
$ | 291 | ||
Laboratory
services
|
979 | |||
Consolidated
depreciation and amortization
|
$ | 1,270 | ||
Expenditure
for segments assets:
|
||||
Core
technology
|
$ | 63 | ||
Laboratory
services
|
101 | |||
Consolidated
expenditure
|
$ | 164 | ||
Segment
goodwill:
|
||||
Core
technology
|
$ | - | ||
Laboratory
services
|
1,905 | |||
Consolidated
goodwill
|
$ | 1,905 | ||
Segment
assets:
|
||||
Core
technology
|
$ | 17,300 | ||
Laboratory
services
|
2,845 | |||
Consolidated
assets
|
$ | 20,145 |
NOTE
17:-
|
SEGMENTS
OF THE COMPANY AND RELATED INFORMATION
(Cont.)
|
December
31
|
||||
2008
|
||||
Israel
|
$ | 1,163 | ||
U.S.A
|
2,294 | |||
$ | 3,457 |
NOTE
18:-
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
|
|
a.
|
1.
|
License
and collaboration agreement with Prometheus:
On
April 10, 2009 the Company entered into a license and collaboration
agreement (the "License Agreement") with Prometheus Laboratories Inc.
("PL") under which the Company agreed to exclusively license and
sublicense to PL certain rights related to the Company's microRNA-based
cancer diagnostic tests: miRview™ mets, miRview™ squamous and
miRview™ meso ("Cancer Diagnostics Products"), including the rights to
certain software developed by the Company and related to the miRview ™
mets product. The Company also agreed to collaborate with Prometheus in
order to further develop the Cancer Diagnostics Products and to develop
two new microRNA-based gastroenterology tests ("GI Products"). Under the
License Agreement, PL has the exclusive right to develop and commercialize
the Cancer Diagnostics Products and the GI Products in the U.S. The
License Agreement also gives PL a right of first negotiation to take a
license for certain diagnostic tests or products that are under
development by the Company.
PL
will contribute to a development fund that will be used to further develop
the Cancer Diagnostic Products and to develop the GI Products. In
addition, PL will pay the Company additional amounts upon reaching certain
publication requirements for the Cancer Diagnostic Products and achieving
certain product profiles for the GI Products. The Company is also entitled
to receive certain payments upon the achievement of commercial milestones.
The total amount potentially payable to the Company under these provisions
is $ 17,000.
The
Company is also entitled to royalties on the sale of the Cancer Diagnostic
Products and the GI Products, subject to reductions in certain
instances.
|
NOTE
18:-
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS (Cont.)
|
|
The
agreement will terminate upon the later of the expiration or abandonment
of the last licensed patent to expire or become abandoned, or, if a
licensed product involves certain sublicensed technical information, until
the end of such additional period as is required under the applicable
upstream license. PL can terminate the agreement (either entirely or as to
one or more licensed products) by providing six months' written notice to
the Company.
|
|
2.
|
Prometheus
stock purchase agreement:
On
April 10, 2009 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with PL
(the "Purchase Agreement"). Under the Purchase Agreement, on April 27,
2009 ("the closing date"), PL purchased 2,000,000 Ordinary shares of the
Company (the "Shares") at a price of $ 4.00 per share in a private
placement transaction. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, so long
as PL or its affiliates continue to hold at least 50% of these Shares, PL
is entitled to information rights, pre-emptive rights and board observer
rights. Pursuant to the pre-emptive rights, PL has the right to
participate in future offerings of the Company's securities to purchase up
to its pro rata share in any such offering on the same terms and
conditions as other investors. Under the terms of the Purchase
Agreement, the Company is also required to prepare and file with the SEC a
Registration Statement on Form F-3 (the "Registration Statement") covering
the resale of the Shares. The Registration Statement should be filed
within 45 days from the closing date and should be declared effective
within 90 days of the closing date if it is not reviewed by the SEC or
within 180 days of the closing date if it is reviewed by the
SEC. If the Registration Statement is not declared effective
within the required timeframe, the Company will be required to pay
liquidated damages equal to 1% of the aggregate purchase of the Shares for
each month that effectiveness is delayed, up to a maximum of 8% of the
aggregate purchase price.
|
|
b.
|
Sale
of Parkway:
On
May 18, 2009, the Company sold Parkway in a management buy-out for up to
maximum amount of $ 2,500 to be paid as a fixed percentage of revenues
(15%) over six years. As a result of the transaction, the Company recorded
a loss in the second quarter of 2009, in the amount of approximately $
2,250, since future proceeds are contingent upon parkway's
revenues.
|
|
c.
|
Green
Energy Initiative:
On
March 11, 2009, the Company received the second milestone payment from the
private investors who invested up to $ 1,500 in the green energy
initiative. The project leverages the Company's proprietary microRNA
technologies and strong IP position to develop a wide range of plant-based
applications (see Note 11).
|
WHERESA
|
Rosetta
has developed the Tests (as such term is hereinafter defined), and is
intending to initiate the offering of the Testing Services to patients
through physicians worldwide;
|
WHEREAS
|
Rosetta
desires that its Testing Services be made available to patients and
physicians in the Territory (as hereinafter defined) and that Teva assist
Rosetta in that effort by and the Administrative Services (as such terms
is hereinafter defined) for and on behalf of Rosetta in and for the
Territory;
|
WHEREAS
|
Teva
desires to exclusively market and purchase Testing Services from Rosetta
and exclusively provide certain Administrative Services for and on behalf
of Rosetta in and for the
Territory;
|
WHEREAS
|
Rosetta
will exclusively in and for the Territory provide the Testing Services
ordered by Teva;
|
WHEREAS
|
Teva
agrees to pay Rosetta for Testing Services ordered by Teva in accordance
with the fees identified in Section 7
herein.
|
|
1.1
|
The
preamble to this Agreement forms an integral part hereof and is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
1.2
|
Clause
headings in this Agreement are intended solely for convenience of
reference and shall be given no effect in the interpretation of this
Agreement.
|
|
1.3
|
All
signed appendices to this Agreement, whether attached at the time of
signature hereof or at any time thereafter, shall be construed as an
integral part of this Agreement.
|
|
1.4
|
In
this Agreement, the following expressions shall bear the meanings assigned
to them below and cognate expressions shall bear corresponding
meanings:
|
|
1.4.1
|
"
Administrative Services
"
– shall mean the sole and exclusive marketing sale and distribution and
logistic services solely provided by Teva with respect to the Tests, all
as detailed in clause 4.
|
|
1.4.2
|
“
Affiliate
” - with
respect to either party, means any person, corporation, company,
partnership or other entity controlling, controlled by or under common
control with such party. For such purpose the term “
control
” means the
holding of 50% or more of the common voting stock or ordinary shares in,
or the right to appoint 50% or more of the directors of, the said
corporation, company, partnership or
entity.
|
|
1.4.3
|
“
Business Day
”- shall
mean working days, not including Saturdays and Sundays and/or public
holidays and bank holidays in the US and
Israel.
|
|
1.4.4
|
“
Effective Date
” – shall
mean the date of signature of this Agreement by the last of the
parties.
|
|
1.4.5
|
“
Instructions
” – shall
mean the written instructions provided to Teva by Rosetta with respect to
the receipt of samples from its patients and physicians, shipment and
delivery of samples for testing, provide customers with the Testing
Services written reports and results, as provided by
Rosetta.
|
|
1.4.6
|
“
Territory
” – shall mean
Israel and Turkey. For the purpose of clarity, Israel and Turkey shall be
regarded as separate territories, and termination in relation to the
Turkey Territory (according to the terms of section 8) shall not affect
the Israeli Territory. In case of termination in relation to the Israeli
Territory the entire Agreement will be terminated unless otherwise agreed
in writing by the parties.
|
|
1.4.7
|
“
Tests
” – "miRview™
squamous", "miRview™ meso" and "miRview™ mets", as conducted by Rosetta
or, its Affiliated and/or other third parties on behalf of Rosetta subject
to the provisions of Section 5.1.
|
|
1.4.8
|
"
Testing Services
” - as
provided by Rosetta, its Affiliates and/or other third parties on behalf
of Rosetta subject to the provisions of Section 5.1 shall include the
conduct of the Tests, the provision of Test reports and results to Teva,
and the return of the paraffin blocks, when supplied. It is agreed by both
parties that other oncology testing services may be added to the above
definition upon agreement of the parties in
writing.
|
|
1.4.9
|
"
Samples
" – paraffin
embedded tissues and/or unstained slides processed from paraffin embedded
tissues provided from pathologists from different medical
institutions.
|
|
2.1
|
Rosetta
hereby appoints Teva as an exclusive reseller of the Testing Services and
the provider of the Administrative Services in and for the Territory in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement, and Teva accepts such
appointment.
|
|
2.2
|
This
Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and, unless terminated
earlier in accordance with Clause 8 below, shall continue for an initial
term of 24 months ("
The
Term
"). The Term shall be automatically renewed for an additional
periods of 12 months each unless either party gives a prior written notice
of its intention not to renew the agreement not later than 3 months before
any renewal.
|
|
2.3
|
Teva
shall be entitled at any time during the term of this Agreement in its
absolute discretion to cease the resale or marketing of the Testing
Services in the Territory (whole or part) for reasons of medical safety or
on legal or regulatory grounds; if Teva ceases resale or marketing of the
Testing Services pursuant to this Section 2.3 for a period exceeding three
(3) months then Rosetta shall have the right to terminate this Agreement
by providing Teva a ten (10) days prior written notice
.
|
|
2.4
|
Rosetta
shall be entitled at any time during the term of this Agreement in its
absolute discretion to cease providing Testing Services to Teva, in whole
or in part, for reasons of medical safety or on legal or regulatory
grounds.
|
|
4.1
|
to
use all reasonable endeavours to market the Testing Services in the
Territory subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and to
perform at its own expense, all tasks and duties and assume all
responsibilities customarily associated with marketing of the Testing
Services;
|
|
4.2
|
to
market Testing Services only from Rosetta, subject to Rosetta’s ability to
carry out the Testing Services in accordance with this Agreement, all
pursuant to section 2.3 herein;
|
|
4.3
|
further
to marketing the Testing Services, Teva shall be responsible for the
receipt of samples in accordance with Instructions from its customers,
shipment and delivery of the Testing Services kit according to the
Instructions to Rosetta for testing, and upon completion of testing, to
provide its customers the Testing Services written reports and results, as
provided by Rosetta, according to the
Instructions.
|
|
4.4
|
to
obtain and maintain all government licenses, approvals and permissions
necessary in connection with the marketing, resale and provision of the
Testing Services to persons in the
Territory;
|
|
4.5
|
to
inform Rosetta of any matter in the Territory of which it is aware that is
likely to affect, significantly, the marketing of the Testing
Services;
|
|
4.6
|
to
provide Rosetta with market and sales information in a timely fashion
including information relating to the sales and marketing activities of
Teva with respect to the Testing
Services,;
|
|
4.7
|
to
handle all physician, patient and other inquiries, whether via telephone
or in writing, regarding Rosetta’s provision of Testing Services,
including information relating to the results of such Testing
Services;
|
|
4.8
|
to
inform Rosetta of any reports of irregularities, complaints or other
adverse information received by Teva relating to the Tests, its use or
quality and/or the Testing Services, and not to take any action with
regard thereto, unless required by law or the regulatory authorities in
the Territory, without obtaining Rosetta’s prior written consent, such
consent to be provided promptly and not unreasonably withheld by
Rosetta;
|
|
4.9
|
to
conduct its marketing activities in a manner that reflects favorably at
all times on the Testing Services and the name, goodwill and reputation of
Rosetta; to refrain from engaging in deceptive, misleading or unethical
practices,
including but not limited to, disparagement of Rosetta or the Testing
Services, and acceptance or payment of bribes, kickbacks or secret
profits; to make no representations, warranties, guarantees or covenants,
with respect to the Testing Services, other than those set forth in the
Promotional Materials, as defined thereafter, provided to Teva by Rosetta;
and not to modify any Promotional Materials without Rosetta’s prior
written consent;
|
|
4.10
|
not
to modify in any manner whatsoever the Test reports and results or
disclaimers associated with such
reports;
|
|
4.11
|
unless
otherwise mutually agreed in writing, to be solely responsible for all
expenses, costs, liabilities and obligations Teva incurs in connection
with its resale of the Testing Services and the provision of the
Administrative Services identified
herein.
|
|
5.1
|
to
provide either by itself or through third parties all of Teva’s
requirements solely and exclusively to Teva for Testing Services ordered
by licensed physicians in the Territory for persons located in the
Territory; Rosetta shall not knowingly provide commercial Testing Services
for a fee to physicians located in the Territory other than through Teva.
All other activities for research purposes only in the Territories will be
coordinated between Teva and Rosetta, and will be conducted according to
applicable law and regulations. Rosetta shall have the right to perform
the Testing Services via third parties subject to the following: (i)
Rosetta being the responsible party; (ii) the Third Party shall have at
least the same capabilities of Rosetta. In the event that Teva shall
refuse the transfer of performance of Services to a third Party due to the
fact that such third Party does not have the same capabilities of Rosetta,
then this agreement at the sole discretion of Teva will be either
terminated or modified to a non exclusive
agreement.
|
|
5.2
|
to
assist and financially share all expenses relating to and/or resulting
from conferences, seminars etc, all as will be mutually agreed (agreement
to be made at the sole discretion of each party) and the details with
respect to such events (including without limitation the details of the
financial aspects of such event) will be added, from time to time, as an
Appendix to this Agreement.
|
|
5.3
|
to
provide [***] to be [***] from signing this
Agreement.
|
|
5.4
|
to
provide Teva with a minimum of [***] Testing Services for compassionate
use programs, upon Teva's sole
discretion.
|
|
5.5
|
to
provide all of Teva’s requirements for the Testing kits to collect the
samples, and to deliver Test report and results within [***] of receipt of
all relevant, complete and sufficient patient information and materials,
including without limitation, Samples, from Teva. The report and results
may be delivered to Teva by telefax or electronic
mail.
|
|
5.6
|
if
paraffin blocks are provided, to return the remainder of the paraffin
blocks to Teva within 1 month, of the conduct of the Tests, unless
otherwise requested by Teva; the cost of such shipments shall be borne by
Rosetta;
|
|
5.7
|
if
Teva provides a Sample, in accordance with the Instructions, and Rosetta
performs the Testing Services on such Sample, but is unable to provide a
report with respect to such Sample, then, at, Rosetta’s expense, Rosetta
will either retest the Sample at its sole expense, or notify Teva that
such Sample will not be retested. If such Sample will not be retested,
Rosetta will not charge Teva for the testing of such
Sample;
|
|
5.8
|
If
Teva provides a Sample, not according to the Instructions, Rosetta will
notify Teva that such Sample will not be tested. Rosetta will charge Teva
only for cost of kit shipment to Rosetta’s lab and cost of pathologist
review (if applicable);
|
|
5.9
|
if
Teva provides a Sample according to the Instructions with respect thereto,
and Rosetta performs the Testing Services on such Sample, and Rosetta
becomes aware that there was an error made in the Testing Services which
affected the Test results, then, at Rosetta’s expense, Rosetta will either
retest the Sample at its sole expense, or notify Teva that such Sample
will not be retested. If such Sample will not be retested, Rosetta will
either not charge, or credit, as applicable, Teva for the Testing of such
Sample.
|
|
5.10
|
In
order to ensure the fulfillment of Rosetta’s responsibilities and
obligations in accordance with this Agreement, Rosetta is obligating to
insure in its own responsibility itself and its employees, in a suitable
and known insurance company commencing as of the Effective Day and shall
maintain for the duration of this Agreement and [***] at its expense the
following insurances, and to provide Teva with proof in a form of
certificate of insurance attached as an Exhibit C of such
insurances.
|
|
5.11
|
Fulfilling
the above mentioned insurance, based on this agreement and the payment of
the insurance sum in accordance, are considered the basic condition of
this agreement.
|
|
5.12
|
None
of the above insurance obligation will reduce Rosetta’s obligations, in
accordance with this Agreement and in accordance with any
law.
|
|
5.13
|
Rosetta
is obligated to inform Teva about any cancellation and/or reduction in
coverage of the Insurance policy and/or modification which shall
negatively effect Teva pursuant to this
Agreement
|
|
5.14
|
Rosetta
undertakes to provide Teva, free-of-charge, all reasonable support and
marketing expertise, including copies of such promotional material as may
be available from time to time, specific to the Testing Services necessary
or useful for Teva in order to assist Teva in promoting and marketing the
Testing Services in the Territory. Teva shall have the right to consult
Rosetta regarding the nature and usage of these promotional materials.
Teva will be responsible for all regulatory compliance of the promotional
material in the Territory.
|
|
5.15
|
Other
than as expressly provided in this agreement, the Testing Services are
provided ‘as is’ without warranty of any kind, whether express or implied,
including without limitation warranties of merchantability, fitness for a
particular purpose and non-infringements, and Rosetta disclaims any and
all such warranties. Rosetta may decline to provide Testing Services on a
specimen received from Teva that does not meet the
Instructions.
|
|
6.1
|
The
Testing Services shall be marketed by Teva under only such trademarks,
service marks and/or other insignia of origin registered in Israel under
Rosetta’s name or anyone on its behalf, as will be decided upon by
Rosetta, in its sole discretion (the “Rosetta
Marks”).
|
|
6.2
|
During
the term, and subject to the terms and conditions, of this Agreement and
for the Territory only, Rosetta hereby grants to Teva a non-exclusive,
non-transferable, limited license to use the Rosetta Marks solely in
connection with the marketing of the Testing Services and the provision of
Administrative Services in the Territory, provided
that:
|
|
6.2.1
|
Teva’s
use of the Rosetta Marks must comply with the Trademark Usage Guidelines
as provided by Rosetta to Teva and attached as an Exhibit A to this
Agreement, as may be amended by Rosetta from time to time upon sufficient
prior written notice to Teva.
|
|
6.2.2
|
Teva
shall ensure that all marketing materials or other documents on which the
Rosetta Marks are placed by Teva (the “Marked Materials”) shall not
reflect adversely upon the name, goodwill or reputation of Rosetta. Teva
agrees that the Marked Materials shall be of such nature, style,
appearance and quality as shall be adequate and suited to the protection
of the Rosetta Marks and the goodwill associated
therewith.
|
|
6.2.3
|
Teva
shall submit to Rosetta, free of cost, two samples of Marked Materials
prior to the dissemination or distribution of the Marked
Materials.
Rosetta, in Rosetta’s sole discretion, shall have the right to review the
Marked Materials submitted by Teva to confirm compliance with this
Agreement. If Rosetta disapproves of any sample of the Marked Materials,
Rosetta shall provide Teva with the specific reasons for such disapproval.
Teva shall promptly make all such changes to the Marked Materials as
Rosetta shall request to protect the value of the Rosetta
Marks.
|
|
6.2.4
|
Teva
shall not use the Rosetta Marks, or any part thereof, as part of or in
combination with any other names or trademarks except with Rosetta’s prior
written approval. Teva shall not use any confusingly similar or diluting
mark, term or design, and shall not attempt to register or aid any third
party in using or attempting to register any such mark, term or design.
Teva shall not use any of the Rosetta Marks in any manner that indicates
that it is using such mark other than as a
licensee.
|
|
6.2.5
|
If
Teva refuses to submit such samples, after being requested by Rosetta to
do so in writing or violates the provisions of this Clause 6 and/or the
Rosetta Trademark Usage Guidelines and does not submit the samples, or
cure the violation within 30 days after being notified of the same,
Rosetta shall have the right to revoke the license granted to Teva
pursuant to this Clause 6.
|
|
6.2.6
|
The
Rosetta Marks and the goodwill associated therewith are and remain
Rosetta’s exclusive property. Teva shall acquire no right, title or
interest in the Rosetta Marks or the goodwill associated therewith, other
than the limited license and right to use the Rosetta Marks set forth in
this Clause 6. All usage of the Rosetta Marks by Teva shall inure to
Rosetta’s benefit. Teva shall not knowingly do or suffer to be done any
act which would impair the Rosetta Marks or the goodwill associated
therewith. Teva shall take any actions reasonably requested by Rosetta,
and upon Rosetta sole expense, including the execution of instruments,
that may be necessary or appropriate to register or otherwise confer or
perfect Rosetta’s rights in the Rosetta Marks in the Territory in
Rosetta’s name. Teva agrees to take no action inconsistent with Rosetta’s
ownership of and interest in the Rosetta Marks, or assist any third party
in doing any of the same.
|
|
6.2.7
|
Teva
was advised that the Rosetta Marks, are and shall remain Rosetta’s. Teva
shall have no claim with regard to the said Rosetta Marks and shall not
challenge Rosetta’s title to the Rosetta Marks or the validity of their
registration, if they are
registered.
|
|
6.2.8
|
Under
no circumstances will anything in this Agreement be construed as granting,
by implication, estoppel or otherwise, any
licenses
or rights in the Rosetta Marks not expressly granted to Teva in this
Clause 6.
|
|
6.3
|
Rosetta
is aware that “Teva” is a registered trade-name/mark of Teva (the “Teva
Trademark”). It is agreed that the Teva Trademark shall not include the
trademarks of Rosetta, whether registered or not (and visa
versa).
|
|
6.4
|
The
Teva Trademark is or shall be registered in the Territory in Teva’s name,
and at its expense.
|
|
6.5
|
The
Teva Trademark, whether registered or not, is and shall remain Teva’s.
Rosetta shall have no claim with regard to the said Teva Trademark and
shall not challenge Teva’s title to the Teva Trademark or the validity of
its registration, if it is registered, even after termination of this
Agreement for any reason.
|
|
7.1
|
Teva
shall pay to Rosetta a fee per Test for the Testing Services that Rosetta
performs under this Agreement in the amount as set forth in Exhibit B. Any
change based on the review shall be made only upon the written agreement
of the parties to be provided at their sole
discretion.
|
|
7.2
|
Terms
of payment - [***], except that Teva may withhold any amounts that are the
subject of a good faith dispute until such dispute is resolved. All
payments shall be made in full and without setoff, upon order, by bank
transfer in U.S. dollars available at Rosetta’s U.S. bank, or otherwise as
Rosetta may direct in advance.
|
|
7.3
|
Teva
shall be solely responsible for setting the pricing for its clients, and
for collecting payment from its clients, for the Testing Services, and
Teva’s delay in collecting, or failure to collect, shall not affect Teva’s
obligation to pay Rosetta the applicable fees in any
way.
|
|
8.1
|
Notwithstanding
the above, and without prejudice to any other rights to which it may be
entitled, either party may terminate this Agreement upon written notice of
termination to the other party:
|
|
8.1.1
|
if
the other party is in material breach of any of the material terms hereof
and fails to remedy such breach [***] of that party being notified of such
breach; or
|
|
8.1.1.1
|
if
the other party is, admits to being or is declared insolvent, or voluntary
or involuntary proceedings are instituted by or against it in bankruptcy,
or receivership,
or
for a winding-up or for the dissolution or re-organization of its assets;
or
|
|
8.1.1.2
|
based
on medical safety or legal or regulatory
reasons.
|
|
8.2
|
In
the event that the Agreement is terminated with respect to the Turkey
territory then the Agreement will continue to be applicable with regard to
the Israeli territory. In the event that the Agreement is terminated with
regard to the Israeli Territory then the entire Agreement will be
terminated, unless otherwise agreed between the Parties in
writing.
|
|
8.3
|
Termination
for breach will have no effect on any performance obligations which have
accrued up to the effective date of such
termination.
|
|
9.1
|
Termination
of this Agreement howsoever caused shall be without prejudice to any other
rights or liabilities accrued at the date of
termination.
|
|
9.2
|
Upon
termination of this Agreement, all rights and licenses granted to Teva
hereunder shall immediately terminate, and Teva shall immediately cease
marketing and distributing the Testing Services, except as expressly
provided in Clause 9.3.
|
|
9.3
|
Upon
termination of this Agreement, Teva shall notify Rosetta of any
outstanding unstained slides or paraffin blocks it has in its possession,
and Rosetta shall notify Teva of any outstanding Teva’s customers’ Tests
it has, which have not been sent to Teva (whether completed or not).
Subject to Teva’s advance payment of the applicable fees, Rosetta
undertakes to complete the relevant Testing Services. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, Rosetta will not be obligated to complete the Testing Services
if Rosetta terminates this Agreement due to Teva’s breach or due to
reasons of medical safety or legal or regulatory
grounds.
|
|
9.4
|
Neither
party shall have any liability to the other for claims based on
termination of this Agreement in accordance with Clause 8, including
without limitation for compensation, reimbursement or damages for the loss
of prospective profits, anticipated sales or goodwill. If a Party is
entitled under local law or otherwise to any special payment or
termination remedy or indemnity as a consequence of the expiration or
termination of this Agreement, such Party hereby waives and disclaims, to
the fullest extent permitted by law, any right to such payment, remedy or
indemnity.
|
|
9.5
|
Clauses
1, 5.8, 6.5, 10, 11, 13, 18, 22 and 24 shall survive any expiration or
termination of this Agreement.
|
10.
|
HOLDING HARMLESS &
INDEMNIFICATION
|
|
10.1
|
Teva
shall be solely responsible for any false or misleading statements, false
or misleading representations or false or misleading warranties, whether
oral or written, made by Teva to its clients. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, Teva agrees and undertakes that it will not
make any false or misleading statement, representation or warranty, oral
or written, concerning the Tests and/or the Testing Services. In the event
that Teva should make any false or misleading statements, representations
or warranties, and claims should arise therefrom, Teva shall defend,
indemnify and hold Rosetta, its affiliates, employees and agents
(including successors and assigns) harmless from and against any and all
costs, damages, expenses and liabilities arising out of or related to such
statement, representation or
warranty.
|
|
10.2
|
Rosetta
shall be solely responsible for any false or misleading statements, false
or misleading representations or false or misleading warranties made in
the Promotional Materials provided by Rosetta to Teva. In the event that
the Promotional Materials shall contain any false or misleading
statements, representations or warranties, and claims should arise
therefrom, Rosetta shall defend, indemnify and hold Teva, its affiliates,
employees and agents (including successors and assigns) harmless from and
against any and all costs, damages, expenses and liabilities arising out
of or related to such statement, representation or
warranty.
|
|
10.3
|
Rosetta
agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Teva, its affiliates, employees and
agents (including successors and assignees) harmless from and against any
claim by a third party and any and all costs, damages, expenses (including
attorneys’ fees and other costs of litigation) and liabilities directly
resulting therefrom arising out of infringement of third party
intellectual property rights by the Testing Services, Rosetta’s negligence
or willful misconduct in Rosetta’s provision of the Testing Services, or
any breach by Rosetta of any of the terms of this Agreement,
provided
,
however
, that
this indemnity shall not extend to any claim, demand, or legal action to
the extent arising from any negligent act or omission or willful
misconduct of Teva (including successors and assignees if
applicable).
|
|
10.4
|
Teva
agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Rosetta, its affiliates, employees,
agents (including successors and assignees) harmless from and against
claim by a third party and any and all costs, damages, expenses (including
attorneys’ fees and other costs of litigation) and liabilities directly
resulting therefrom arising out of Teva’s negligence or willful misconduct
in Teva’s provision of the Testing Services, or as result of any breach by
Teva of any of the terms of this Agreement,
provided
,
however
, that
this indemnity shall not extend to any claim, demand, or legal action
to
the extent arising from any negligent act or omission or willful
misconduct of Rosetta (including successors and assignees if
applicable).
|
|
10.5
|
The
indemnity obligations under this Clause 10 are contingent upon: The party
seeking indemnification (the “Indemnified Party”) (a) notifying the
Indemnifying Party as soon as reasonably possible in reasonable detail of
any claim, demand, action or proceeding for which indemnification is
sought (the “Indemnified Claim”), (b) allowing the Indemnifying Party to
control the defense and/or settlement of the Indemnified Claim, and (c)
providing the Indemnifying Party with assistance in any defense and/or
settlement thereof at the Indemnifying Party’s
expense.
|
|
10.6
|
The
Indemnifying Party shall at its expense, assume the defense thereof using
counsel reasonably acceptable to the Indemnified Party. The Indemnified
Party shall have the right to participate at its own expense, in the
defense and/or settlement of any third party claim, demand, action or
proceeding. In connection with any such third party claim, demand, action
or proceeding, the parties shall cooperate with each other and provide
each other with access to relevant books and records in their possession.
No such third party claim, demand, action or proceeding shall be settled
without the prior written consent of the parties, which consent shall not
be unreasonably withheld. The Indemnifying Party shall reimburse the
Indemnified Party upon demand for any payments made based upon a
conclusive judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction or pursuant to
a bona fide compromise or settlement of claims agreed and accepted by the
Indemnifying Party, in respect to any damages related to any claim under
this Clause 10. In the event that the parties agree to settle a claim or
action, such settlement shall not be publicized without the prior written
consent of the parties, which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
|
|
10.7
|
The
provisions of this Clause shall survive the expiration or termination of
this Agreement for any reason.
|
|
11.1
|
All
Proprietary Information disclosed by one Party to the other Party
hereunder shall be maintained in confidence and shall not be disclosed to
any Third Party or used for any purpose except as expressly permitted
herein without the prior written consent of the Party that disclosed the
Proprietary Information to the other Party for a period of five (5) years
from the date hereof. The foregoing non-disclosure and non-use obligations
shall not apply to the extent that such Proprietary
Information:
|
(i)
|
is
known by the receiving Party at the time of its receipt, and not through a
prior disclosure by the disclosing Party, as documented by contemporaneous
written records;
|
(ii)
|
is
in the public domain or
knowledge;
|
|
(iii)
|
is
subsequently disclosed to a receiving Party by a Third Party who may
lawfully do so and is not under an obligation of confidentiality to the
disclosing Party; or
|
|
(iv)
|
is
developed by the receiving Party independently of Proprietary Information
received from the other Party, as documented by contemporaneous research
and development records.
|
|
11.2
|
Notwithstanding
Section 11.1, a Party receiving Proprietary Information of the other Party
may disclose such Proprietary
Information:
|
(i)
|
to
governmental or other regulatory agencies in order to obtain patents, or
to gain approval to conduct clinical trials or to market the Tests and/or
the Testing Services to the extent permitted hereunder, but such
disclosure may be only to the extent reasonably necessary to obtain such
patents or authorizations;
|
(ii)
|
to
its respective agents, consultants, Affiliates, potential and actual
sublicensees, and/or other Third Parties for the research and development,
manufacturing and/or marketing of the Tests and/or the Testing Services
(or for such Third Parties to determine their interests in performing such
activities) on the condition that such Third Parties agree to be bound by
the confidentiality obligations contained in this
Agreement;
|
|
(iii)
|
to
actual or prospective acquirers or sources of financing on the condition
that such Third Parties agree to be bound by the confidentiality
obligations contained in this Agreement;
or
|
|
(iv)
|
if
required to be disclosed by law or court order, provided that, to the
extent permitted by law, notice is promptly delivered to the disclosing
Party in order to provide an opportunity to challenge or limit the
disclosure obligations; provided, however, without limiting any of the
foregoing, it is understood that either Party or its Affiliates may make
disclosure of this Agreement and the terms hereof in any filings required
by the SEC (or any applicable stock exchange or regulatory organization),
may file this Agreement as an exhibit to any filing with the SEC (or any
applicable stock exchange or regulatory organization) and may distribute
any such filing in the ordinary course of its business. However, to the
maximum extent allowable by SEC (or any applicable stock exchange or
regulatory organization) rules and regulations, the Parties shall be
obligated to maintain the confidentiality obligations set forth herein and
shall redact any confidential
information
set forth in such filings as may be reasonably requested by the disclosing
Party.
|
|
11.1
|
The
provisions of this Clause shall survive the expiration or termination of
this Agreement for any reason.
|
|
12.1
|
The
obligations of each party under this Agreement shall be suspended during
the period of this Agreement and to the extent that such party is
prevented or hindered from complying herewith by any cause beyond its
reasonable control including (insofar as they are beyond such control but
without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing expression) strike,
act of God, war, riot, civil commotion, malicious damage, compliance with
any law or governmental order, rule, regulation or direction, accident,
breakdown of plant or machinery, fire, flood, storm, difficulty or
increased expense in obtaining workmen, materials or transport or other
circumstances affecting the supply of goods or of raw materials
therefor.
|
|
12.2
|
In
the event of either party being so hindered or prevented, such party shall
give notice of suspension as soon as reasonably possible to the other
party stating the date and extent of such suspension and the cause
thereof. The failure to give such notice shall forfeit the rights of such
party to relief under this Clause.
|
|
12.3
|
Any
party whose obligations have been suspended as aforesaid shall resume the
performance of such obligations as soon as reasonably possible after the
removal of the cause and shall so notify the other party. In the event
that such cause continues for more than six months either party may
terminate this Agreement on thirty days notice to the other
party.
|
|
15.1
|
Rosetta
hereby represents and warrants that the execution and delivery by Rosetta
of this Agreement and the performance by Rosetta of its obligations
hereunder have been duly authorized by all necessary
corporate
action on the part of Rosetta, and do not conflict with the terms of any
other contract, agreement, arrangement or understanding to which Rosetta
is a party.
|
|
|
15.2
|
Teva
hereby represents and warrants the execution and delivery by Teva of this
Agreement and the performance by Teva of its obligations hereunder have
been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of
Teva, and do not conflict with the terms of any other contract, agreement,
arrangement or understanding to which Teva is a
party.
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
12.15
|
Counterparts
|
53
|
|
13.
|
CLOSING.
|
53
|
|
13.1
|
Closing
Date
|
53
|
|
13.2
|
Deliverables
at Closing by Rosetta
|
53
|
|
13.3
|
Deliverables
at Closing by Prometheus
|
54
|
|
13.4
|
Conditions
Precedent to Obligations of Prometheus
|
54
|
|
13.5
|
Conditions
Precedent to Obligations of Seller
|
54
|
|
13.6
|
Waiver
of Conditions
|
55
|
|
13.7
|
Notifications.
|
55
|
|
13.8
|
No
Negotiation.
|
55
|
Annex A |
Licensed
Intellectual Property
|
||
Annex B |
Development
Plan
|
||
Annex C |
Services
Agreement
|
||
Annex D |
Service
Agreement Profits
|
||
Annex E |
Estimate
for Additional Development Expenses
|
||
Annex F |
Existing
Research Agreements
|
||
Annex G |
Select
Provisions of JHU Agreement
|
||
Annex H |
Rosetta
Press Release
|
||
Annex I |
Form
of THM Written Statement
|
1.
|
DEFINITIONS
|
2.
|
GRANT
OF RIGHTS; NON-COMPETE
|
3.
|
DEVELOPMENT
AND COMMERCIALIZATION MATTERS
|
4.
|
PAYMENTS
|
(a)
Cumulative Net Sales during the Term of [***]
|
[***]
US dollars [***]
|
(b)
First calendar year during the Term in which annual Net Sales exceed
[***]
|
[***]
US dollars [***]
|
5.
|
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY RIGHTS
|
6.
|
CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION
|
7.
|
REPRESENTATIONS,
WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS
|
9.
|
TERM
AND TERMINATION
|
10.
|
LIMITATION OF
LIABILITY
|
11.
|
DISPUTE
RESOLUTION
|
12.
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
13.
|
CLOSING.
|
Application
|
Assignee
|
Application
No.
|
|
1
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
2
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
3
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
4
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Application
|
Assignee
|
Application
No.
|
|
1
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Application
|
Assignee
|
Application
No.
|
|
1
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
2
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
3
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
4
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Application
|
Assignee
|
Application
No.
|
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
1.
|
Material
Transfer Agreement between University of Iowa Research Foundation and
Rosetta Genomics Ltd. Dated February 3,
2009;
|
2.
|
Research
and License Agreement between the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer
Center and Rosetta Genomics Ltd. Dated April 2008;
and
|
3.
|
Research
Agreement between the Johns Hopkins University and Rosetta Genomics Ltd.
Dated August 27, 2008.
|
Ron Kamienchick | Bruce Voss | Pete De Spain |
Rosetta Genomics | Lippert/Heilshorn & Associates | Prometheus Laboratories Inc. |
646-509-1893 | 310-691-7100 | 858-587-4117 |
investors@rosettagenomics.com | bvoss@lhai.com | pdespain@prometheuslabs.com |
1.
|
THE
SCOPE OF THE SERVICES
|
2.
|
CONDUCT
OF DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
|
|
2.1
|
Performance of
Services
.
|
3.
|
PERSONNEL
|
4.
|
RECORDS
AND REPORTS
|
5.
|
COMPENSATION
|
6.
|
PRIVACY;
CONFIDENTIALITY
|
7.
|
USE
OF NAMES
|
8.
|
WARRANTIES
|
9.
|
INDEMNITIES
|
10.
|
OWNERSHIP
|
11.
|
INSURANCE
|
12.
|
TERM
AND TERMINATION
|
13.
|
EXCLUSIONS
OF LIABILITY; DISPUTE RESOLUTION
|
14.
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
Squamous Test: | US $[***] | |
METS Test: | US $[***] | |
Mesothelioma Test: | US $[***] |
|
1.
|
I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Rosetta Genomics
Ltd.;
|
|
2.
|
Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
|
|
3.
|
Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
|
|
4.
|
The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
|
|
a)
|
designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
|
|
b)
|
designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
|
|
c)
|
evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
|
|
d)
|
disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting; and
|
|
5.
|
The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
|
|
a)
|
all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and
|
|
b)
|
any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting.
|
Dated:
June 30, 2009
|
/s/ Amir Avniel
|
Amir
Avniel
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
|
(principal
executive officer)
|
|
1.
|
I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Rosetta Genomics
Ltd.;
|
|
2.
|
Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
|
|
3.
|
Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
|
|
4.
|
The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
|
|
a)
|
designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
|
|
b)
|
designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
|
|
c)
|
evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
|
|
d)
|
disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting; and
|
|
5.
|
The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
|
|
a)
|
all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and
|
|
b)
|
any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting.
|
Dated:
June 30, 2009
|
/s/ Limor Zur Stoller
|
Limor
Zur Stoller
|
|
Vice
President Finance
|
|
(principal
accounting and financial
officer)
|
Dated:
June 30, 2009
|
/s/ Amir Avniel
|
Amir
Avniel
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
|
(principal
executive officer)
|
|
Dated:
June 30, 2009
|
/s/ Limor Zur Stoller
|
Limor
Zur Stoller
|
|
Vice
President Finance
|
|
(principal
accounting and financial
officer)
|
/s/
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
|
|
Tel-Aviv,
Israel
|
Kost
Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
|
June
30, 2009
|
A
Member of Ernst & Young
Global
|