As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on april 29, 2013

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 20-F

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012

 

Commission file number: 001-34175

ECOPETROL S.A.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

N/A

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

 

REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

Carrera 13 No. 36 – 24

BOGOTA – COLOMBIA

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

Alejandro Giraldo

Investor Relations Officer

investors@ecopetrol.com.co

Tel. (571) 234 5190

Fax. (571) 234 5628

Carrera 13 N.36-24 Piso 8

Bogota, Colombia

(Name, Telephone, E-Mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

 

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered:
American Depository Shares (as evidenced by American Depository Receipts), each representing 20 common shares par value Ps$250 per share New York Stock Exchange
Ecopetrol common shares par value Ps$250 per share New York Stock Exchange (for listing purposes only)
7.625% Notes due 2019 New York Stock Exchange

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

 

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

 

41,116,698,456 Ecopetrol common shares, par value Ps$250 per share

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

 

x Yes ¨ No

 

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

¨ Yes x No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

x Yes ¨ No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted 28576 submit and post such files).

 

N/A

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨

 

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

¨   U.S. GAAP ¨   International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board x Other

 

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:

¨ Item 17    x Item 18

 

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

¨ Yes x No

 

 

 
 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

    Page
     
  Forward-Looking Statements 1
  Enforcement of Civil Liabilities 1
  Presentation of Financial Information 2
  Presentation of Abbreviations 4
  Presentation of The Nation and Government of Colombia 4
  Presentation of Information Concerning Reserves 4
ITEM 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors 5
ITEM 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable 5
ITEM 3. Key Information 5
  Selected Financial Data 5
  Exchange Rate Information 7
  Risk Factors 8
ITEM 4. Information on the Company 24
  The Company 24
  Overview By Business Segment 29
  Transportation Infrastructure 53
  Property, Plant and Equipment 74
ITEM 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments 74
ITEM 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects 75
  Operating Results 81
  Liquidity and Capital Resources 93
  Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc. 95
  Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements 96
  Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations 97
ITEM 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees 98
  Directors and Senior Management 98
  Compensation 102
  Share Ownership 102
  Board Practices 102
  Employees 104
ITEM 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions 107
  Major Shareholders 107
  Related Party Transactions 107
ITEM 8. Financial Information 113
  Consolidated Statements And Other Financial Information 113
  Legal Proceedings 113
  Dividends 114
  Significant Changes 114
ITEM 9. The Offer and Listing 115
  Trading Markets 115
  Trading On The Bolsa De Valores De Colombia 116
ITEM 10. Additional Information 118
  Bylaws 118
  Material Contracts 121
  Taxation 122
  Documents On Display 128
ITEM 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 128
ITEM 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities 131
ITEM 12A. Debt Securities 131
ITEM 12B. Warrants and Rights 131
ITEM 12C. Other Securities 131
ITEM 12D. American Depositary Shares 131

 

i
 

 

ITEM 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies 132
ITEM 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds 133
ITEM 15. Controls and Procedures 133
ITEM 16. [Reserved] 134
ITEM 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert 134
ITEM 16B. Code of Ethics 134
ITEM 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 134
  Audit and Non-Audit Fees 134
ITEM 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees 135
ITEM 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers 135
ITEM 16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant 135
ITEM 16G. Corporate Governance 136
ITEM 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure 137
ITEM 17. Financial Statements 137
ITEM 18. Financial Statements 137
ITEM 19. Exhibits 138

 

ii
 

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This annual report on Form 20-F contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are not based on historical facts and reflect our expectations for future events and results. Most facts are uncertain because of their nature. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “should,” “plan,” “potential,” “predicts,” “prognosticate,” “project,” “target,” “achieve” and “intend,” among other similar expressions, are understood as forward-looking statements. These factors may include the following:

 

· drilling and exploration activities;

 

· future production rates;

 

· import and export activities;

 

· liquidity, cash flow and uses of cash flow;

 

· projected capital expenditures;

 

· dates by which certain areas will be developed or will come on-stream; and

 

· allocation of capital expenditures to exploration and production activities.

 

Actual results are subject to certain factors out of the control of the Company and may differ materially from the anticipated results. These factors may include the following:

 

· changes in international crude oil and natural gas prices;

 

· competition;

 

· limitations on our access to sources of financing;

 

· significant political, economic and social developments in Colombia and other countries where we do business;

 

· military operations, terrorist acts, wars or embargoes;

 

· regulatory developments, including regulations related to climate change;

 

· natural disasters;

 

· technical difficulties; and

 

· other factors discussed in this document as “Risk Factors.”

 

Most of these statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could differ materially from projected results. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report.

 

Enforcement of Civil Liabilities

 

We are a Colombian company, all of our Directors and executive officers and some of the experts named in this annual report reside outside the United States.  All or a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of these persons are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for you to effect service of process within the United States upon us or these persons or to enforce against us or them judgments in U.S. courts obtained in such courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws.  Colombian courts will determine whether to enforce a U.S. judgment predicated on the U.S. securities laws through a proceeding known as exequatur . The Colombian Supreme Court will enforce a foreign judgment, without reconsideration of the merits only if the judgment satisfies the following requirements:

 

1
 

 

· a treaty exists between Colombia and the country where the judgment was granted or there is reciprocity in the recognition of foreign judgments between the courts of the relevant jurisdiction and the courts of Colombia;

 

· the foreign judgment does not relate to “in rem rights” vested in assets that were located in Colombia at the time the suit was filed and does not contravene or conflict with Colombian laws relating to public order other than those governing judicial procedures;

 

· the foreign judgment, in accordance with the laws of the country where it was rendered, is final and is not subject to appeal and a duly certified and authenticated copy of the judgment has been presented to a competent court in Colombia;

 

· the foreign judgment does not refer to any matter upon which Colombian courts have exclusive jurisdiction;

 

· no proceeding is pending in Colombia with respect to the same cause of action, and no final judgment has been awarded in any proceeding in Colombia on the same subject matter and between the same parties; and

 

· in the proceeding commenced in the foreign court that issued the judgment, the defendant is served in accordance with the laws of such jurisdiction and in a manner reasonably designated to give the defendant an opportunity to defend against the action.

 

The United States and Colombia do not have a bilateral treaty providing for automatic reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. The Colombian Supreme Court has in the past accepted that reciprocity exists when it has been proven that either a U.S. court has enforced a Colombian judgment or that a U.S. court would enforce a foreign judgment, including a judgment issued by a Colombian court. However, such enforceability decisions are considered by Colombian courts on a case-by-case basis.

 

Presentation of Financial Information

 

Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Ecopetrol,” “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” or the “Corporate Group” are used in this annual report to refer to Ecopetrol S.A. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

 

In this annual report, references to “US$” or “U.S. dollars” are to United States dollars and references to “Ps$,” “Peso” or “Pesos” are to Colombian Pesos, the functional currency under which we prepare our financial statements. Certain figures shown in this annual report have been subject to rounding adjustments and, accordingly, certain totals may therefore not precisely equal the sum of the numbers presented. In this annual report a billion is equal to one with nine zeros.

 

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles for Colombian state-owned entities issued by the Colombian National Accounting Office ( Contaduría General de la Nación ), or CGN, and other applicable legal provisions.

 

Our consolidated financial statements at and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 and the selected financial data at and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008 have been prepared under Public Accounting Regime ( Régimen de Contabilidad Pública) , or RCP, as adopted by the CGN in September, 2007 and applicable to Ecopetrol beginning with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements. We refer to RCP as Colombian Government Entity GAAP. Colombian Government Entity GAAP differs in certain significant respects from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report provides a description of the principal differences between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP as they relate to our audited consolidated financial statements and provides a reconciliation of net income and shareholders’ equity for the years and dates indicated therein. As a state-owned company, our consolidated financial statements are periodically reviewed by the CGN. However, the review of our accounts by the CGN does not constitute an audit.

 

The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements of Ecopetrol and our consolidated subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 have been prepared from accounting records, which are maintained under the historical cost convention as modified in 1992, to comply with the legal provisions of the CGN.

 

2
 

 

Certain line items from our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 related to the presentation of the consolidated Balance Sheet and the Consolidated Statement of Financial, Economic, Social and Environmental Activities have been reclassified in order to make the presentation of such financial statements comparable to that of the financial statements as of December 31, 2012. The main reclassifications were under cost of sales, marketing and projects, accounts payable and related parties, Taxes, contributions and duties payable, Deposits held in trust and Other assets. See Note 34 to our consolidated financial statements for a description of the principal differences.

 

Our consolidated financial statements were consolidated line by line and all transactions and significant balances between affiliates have been eliminated. These financial statements include the financial results of the following companies:

 

COMPANY   OWNERSHIP %     Included in
consolidated
Financial Statements
for the year ended
 
          2012     2011     2010  
                         
Black Gold Re Ltd.     100.00       X       X       X  
Ecopetrol Oleo é Gas Do Brasil Ltda.     100.00       X       X       X  
Ecopetrol del Perú S.A.     100.00       X       X       X  
Ecopetrol America Inc.     100.00       X       X       X  
Andean Chemicals Ltd.     100.00       X       X       X  
Polipropileno del Caribe S.A. (Propilco)     100.00       X       X       X  
Ecopetrol Global Energy SLU     100.00       X       X       X  
Refinería de Cartagena S.A. (Reficar)     100.00       X       X       X  
COMAI Compounding and Masterbatching Industry Ltda.     100.00       X       X       X  
Hocol Petroleum Ltd.     100.00       X       X       X  
Ecopetrol Capital AG     100.00       X       X       X  
Ecopetrol Pipelines International Limited     100.00       X       X       X  
Ecopetrol Global Capital SL     100.00       X       X          
Cenit Transporte y Logistica de Hidrocarburos S.A.S.     100.00       X                  
Ecopetrol Transportation Company Ltd.     100.00               X       X  
Ecopetrol Transportation Investment Ltd     100.00               X       X  
Bioenergy S.A.     91.43       X       X       X  
ODL Finance S.A.     65.00       X       X       X  
Oleoducto Central S.A. (Ocensa)     72.65       X       X       X  
Oleoducto de Colombia (ODC)     73.00       X       X       X  
Equion Energía Ltd. (Equion)     51.00       X       X          
Oleoducto Bicentenario de Colombia S.A.S.     55.97       X       X       X  

 

This annual report translates certain Peso amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates solely for the convenience of the reader. Unless otherwise indicated, such Peso amounts have been translated at the rate of Ps$1,768.23 per US$1.00, which corresponds to the Tasa Representativa del Mercado, or Representative Market Exchange Rate, for December 31, 2012. The Representative Market Exchange Rate is computed and certified by the Superintendencia Financiera, or Superintendency of Finance, the Colombian banking and securities regulator, on a daily basis and represents the weighted average of the buy and sell foreign exchange rates negotiated on the previous day by financial institutions authorized to engage in foreign exchange transactions. The Superintendency of Finance also calculates the Representative Market Exchange Rate for each month for purposes of preparing financial statements and converting amounts in foreign currency to Pesos. Such conversion should not be construed as a representation that the Peso amounts correspond to, or have been or could be converted into, U.S. dollars at that rate or any other rate. On April 26, 2013, the Representative Market Exchange Rate was Ps$1,830.84 per US$1.00.

 

3
 

 

Presentation Of Abbreviations

 

The following is a list of crude oil and natural gas measurement abbreviations commonly used throughout this annual report.

 

bpd Barrels per day
boe Barrels of oil equivalent
boepd Barrels of oil equivalent per day
btu British thermal units
cf Cubic feet
cfpd Cubic feet per day
mcf Million cubic feet
mcfpd Million cubic feet per day
mbtu Million British thermal units
gbtu Giga British thermal units
gbtud Giga British thermal units per day
bcf Billion Cubic feet

 

Presentation Of The Nation And Government Of Colombia

 

References to the Nation in this annual report relate to the Republic of Colombia, our controlling shareholder. References made to the Government of Colombia or the Government correspond to the executive branch including the President of Colombia, the ministries and other governmental agencies responsible for regulating our business.

 

Presentation Of Information Concerning Reserves

 

The estimates of our proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas included in this annual report have been calculated according to the technical definitions required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.  Our hydrocarbon net proved reserves have been audited in 2012 by Ryder Scott Company L.P., DeGolyer and MacNaughton and Gaffney, Cline & Associates Inc., which we refer to collectively as the External Engineers, and their reserves reports are included as exhibits herein. All reserve estimates involve some degree of uncertainty. See “Item 4.  Information on the Company—Overview by Business Segment—Exploration and Production—Reserves” for additional information on our reserves estimates.

 

The following table sets forth the percentage of our estimated net proved reserves audited by External Engineers and the percentage calculated internally for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. Our proved reserves as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are based on the SEC average price methodology for purposes of both Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks related to our business” for a description of the risks’ relating to our reserves and our reserve estimates.

 

    Estimated proved reserves for the year ended
December 31,
 
    2012     2011     2010  
Net proved reserves audited by External Engineers     99 %     99 %     99 %
Net proved reserves estimates on our own calculations     1 %     1 %     1 %

 

We are required, as are all oil companies undertaking exploratory and production activities in Colombia, to pay a percentage of our production to the Government as royalties.  The oil and gas reserve figures included in this annual report are net of such royalties.

 

4
 

 

ITEM 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 3. Key Information

 

Selected Financial Data

 

The following table sets forth, for the periods and at the dates indicated, our selected historical financial data, which have been derived from and should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, our consolidated financial statements and accompanying Notes included in this annual report, presented in Pesos. KPMG Ltda. audited our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. Our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers Ltda. The information included below and elsewhere in this annual report is not necessarily indicative of our future performance. See also “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” in this annual report.

 

Colombian Government Entity GAAP differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. For a description of the principal differences between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP as they relate to us, a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of net income and shareholders’ equity, and financial statements under U.S. GAAP, see Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Principal Differences Between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP.”

 

    BALANCE SHEET  
    For the year ended December 31,  
    2012 (1)     2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  
    (US$ in thousands
except for common
share and dividends
per share amounts)
    (Pesos in millions except for common share and dividends per share amounts)  
             
Total assets     64,403,148       113,879,578       92,277,386       68,769,356       55,559,517       48,702,412  
Shareholders’ Equity     36,613,382       64,740,881       54,688,855       41,328,181       32,569,957       34,619,717  
Subscribed capital     5,813,257       10,279,175       10,279,175       10,118,128       10,118,128       10,118,128  
Number of common shares     41,116,698,456 (2)     41,116,698,456 (2)     41,116,698,456 (2)     40,472,512,588       40,472,512,588       40,472,512,588  
Dividends declared per share (3)     0.17       300       145       91.0       220.0       115.0  
Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP                                                
Total Assets     46,102,222       81,519,332       70,909,079       52,332,148       42,624,352       40,244,452  
Shareholders’ Equity     21,291,547       37,648,352       36,055,173       27,175,285       22,383,712       27,425,735  
Number of common shares     41,116,698,456 (2)     41,116,698,456 (2)     41,116,698,456 (2)     40,472,512,588       40,472,512,588       40,472,512,588  
Dividends declared per share (3)     0.17       300       145       91.0       220.0       115.0  

 

 

 

(1) Amounts stated in U.S. dollars have been translated for the convenience of the reader at the rate of Ps$1,768.23 to US$1.00, which is the Representative Market Exchange Rate at December 31, 2012, as reported and certified by the Superintendency of Finance.

(2) Number of common shares includes 644,185,868 shares issued to the public in connection with our second offering of shares in Colombia in September 2011.

(3) Represents payments made in 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008, based on net income and retained earnings for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007 respectively.

 

5
 

 

    INCOME STATEMENT  
    For the year ended December 31,  
    2012 ( 1 )     2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  
    (US$ in thousands
except for net
income per share
and average number
of shares amounts)
    (Pesos in millions except for net income per share and average number of shares amounts)  
Total revenue     38,938,375       68,852,002       65,967,514       42,089,745       30,404,390       33,896,669  
Operating income     13,689,560       24,206,290       25,872,980       12,747,448       7,873,339       12,657,358  
Net operating income per share     0.33       589       637       315       195       313  
Income before income tax     12,629,410       22,331,701       23,641,432       11,492,617       7,250,844       16,011,204  
Net income     8,358,046       14,778,947       15,452,334       8,146,471       5,132,054       11,629,677  
Weighted average number of shares outstanding     41,116,698,456 (2)     41,116,698,456 (2)     40,634,882,725 (2)     40,472,512,588       40,472,512,588       40,472,512,588  
Net income per share (3)     0.20       359       380       201.28       127       287  
Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP                                                
                                                 
Total revenue     37,815,859       66,867,137       62,715,815       40,879,324       29,551,574       33,849,213  
Operating income     13,322,341       23,556,963       23,673,787       13,878,515       8,055,213       9,840,311  
Net operating income per share     0.32       573       583       343       199       243  
Income before income tax and non-controlling interest     12,675,660       22,413,482       23,456,685       12,840,721       8,768,383       13,427,443  
Net income attributable to Ecopetrol     8,310,937       14,695,649       14,817,207       8,211,035       5,718,304       8,841,883  
Net income per share     0.20       357       365       203       141       218  
Average number of shares outstanding (4)     41,116,698,456       41,116,698,456       40,634,882,725       40,472,512,588       40,472,512,588       40,472,512,588  

 

 

(1) Amounts stated in U.S. dollars have been translated for the convenience of the reader at the rate of Ps$1,768.23 to US$1.00, which was the Representative Market Exchange Rate at December 31, 2012, as reported and certified by the Superintendency of Finance.

(2) The weighted average number of common shares outstanding during 2012 and 2011 was 41,116,698,456 and 40,634,882,725, respectively, as a result of 644,185,868 shares issued to the public in connection with our second offering of shares in Colombia in September 2011.

(3) Net income per share is calculated using the weighted-average number of outstanding shares at December 31 of each year.

(4) Calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which differs in certain respects with the calculation of weighted average number of shares pursuant to Colombian Government Entity GAAP.

 

6
 

 

Exchange Rate Information

 

On April 26, 2013, the Representative Market Exchange Rate was Ps$1,830.84 per US$1.00. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York does not report a noon-buying rate for Colombian Pesos. The Superintendency of Finance calculates the Representative Market Exchange Rate based on the weighted averages of the buy and sell foreign exchange rates quoted daily by foreign exchange rate market intermediaries including financial institutions for the purchase and sale of U.S. dollars.

 

The following table sets forth the high, low, average and period-end exchange rate for Pesos/U.S. dollar Representative Market Exchange Rate for each of the last five years and for the last six months.

 

    Exchange Rates  
    High     Low     Average     Period-End  
                         
2008     2,392.28       1,652.41       1,966.26       2,243.59  
2009     2,596.37       1,825.68       2,156.29       2,044.23  
2010     2,044.23       1,786.20       1,897.89       1,913.98  
2011     1,972.76       1,748.41       1,848.17       1,942.70  
2012     1,942.70       1,754.89       1,798.23       1,768.23  
October     1,831.25       1,795.40       1,804.97       1,829.89  
November     1,831.25       1,814.21       1,820.29       1,817.93  
December     1,813.73       1,768.23       1,793.94       1,768.23  
                                 
2013:                                
January     1,779.84       1,758.45       1,770.01       1,773.24  
February     1,818.54       1,775.65       1,791.48       1,816.42  
March     1,828.95       1,797.28       1,809.89       1,832.20  
April (through April 26)     1,847.02       1,813.11       1,829.83       1,830.84  

 

Source: Superintendency of Finance for historical data. Banco de la República , or the Colombian Central Bank for averages.

 

7
 

 

Risk Factors

 

Risks related to our business

 

Our crude oil and natural gas reserve estimates involve some degree of uncertainty and may prove to be incorrect over time, which could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue.

 

Reserves estimates are prepared using generally accepted geological and engineering evaluation methods and procedures. Estimates are based on geological, topographic and engineering facts. Actual reserves and production may vary materially from estimates shown in this annual report, and downward revisions in our reserve estimates could lead to lower future production which could affect our results of operations and financial condition.

 

Our business depends substantially on international prices for crude oil and refined products, and prices for these products are volatile. A sharp decrease in such prices could adversely affect our business prospects and results of operations.

 

Crude oil prices have traditionally fluctuated as a result of a variety of factors including, among others, the following:

 

· competition within the oil and natural gas industry;

 

· changes in international prices of natural gas and refined products;

 

· long-term changes in the demand for crude oil, natural gas and refined products;

 

· regulatory changes;

 

· inventory levels;

 

· increase in the cost of capital;

 

· adverse economic conditions;

 

· global or regional financial crises, such as the global financial crisis of 2008;

 

· development of new technologies;

 

· global and regional economic and political developments in oil producing regions, particularly in the Middle East;

 

· the willingness and ability of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, and its members to set production levels and prices;

 

· local and global demand and supply for crude oil, oil products and natural gas;

 

· trading activity in oil and natural gas and transactions in derivative financial instruments related to oil and gas;

 

· development or availability of alternative fuels;

 

· weather conditions;

 

· natural events or disasters; and

 

· terrorism and armed conflict.

 

As of December 2012, nearly 96% of our revenues came from sales of crude oil, natural gas and refined products. Most prices for products developed and sold by us are quoted in U.S. dollars and consequently, fluctuations in the U.S. dollar/Peso exchange rate have a direct effect on our Peso-denominated financial statements.

 

8
 

 

A significant and sustained decrease in crude oil prices could have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, a reduction of international crude oil prices could result in a delay or a change in our capital expenditure plan, in particular delaying exploration and development activities, thereby delaying the development of reserves and affecting future cash flows.

 

Our operations are subject to certain operational risks that, if materialized, may result in the disruption or shutdown of our operation activities, as well as in damages to the environment and to third parties.

 

Our exploration, production, refining and transportation activities are subject to industry-specific operating risks, some of which, despite our internal procedures, are beyond our control. Our operations may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled due to adverse or abnormal weather conditions, natural disasters, equipment failures or accidents, oil or natural gas spills or leaks, shortages or delays in the availability or in the delivery of equipment, delays or cancellation of environmental licenses or other government authorizations, fires, explosions, blow-outs, surface cratering, pipeline failures, theft and damage to our transportation infrastructure, sabotage, terrorist attacks and criminal activities.

 

The occurrence of any of these operating risks could result in substantial losses or slowdowns to our operations, including injury to our employees, destruction of property, equipment and infrastructure, clean-up responsibilities, third-party liability claims, government investigations and imposition of fines, withdrawal of environmental licenses and other government permits, suspension or shutdown of our activities and loss of revenue. The occurrence of any of these events may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

We are exposed to the credit risks of our customers and any material nonpayment or nonperformance by our key customers could adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations.

 

Our customers may experience financial problems that could have a significant negative effect on their creditworthiness. Severe financial problems encountered by our customers could limit our ability to collect amounts owed to us, or to enforce the performance of obligations owed to us under contractual arrangements. In addition, many of our customers finance their activities through their cash flows from operations, the incurrence of debt or the issuance of equity.

 

The combination of declining cash flows as a result of declines in commodity prices, a reduction in borrowing bases under reserve-based credit facilities and the lack of availability of debt or equity financing may result in a significant reduction of our customers’ liquidity and limit their ability to make payments or perform on their obligations to us.

 

Furthermore, some of our customers may be highly leveraged and subject to their own operating expenses. Therefore, the risk we face in doing business with these customers may increase. Other customers may also be subject to regulatory changes, which could increase the risk of defaulting on their obligations to us. For example, constraints on foreign currency transactions by the Venezuelan government have resulted in delays by PDVSA Gas to make payments to its providers, including us. Financial problems experienced by our customers could result in the impairment of our assets, a decrease in our operating cash flows and may also reduce or curtail our customers’ future use of our products and services, which may have an adverse effect on our revenues.

 

Achieving our long-term growth prospects depends on our ability to execute our Strategic Plan, in particular discovering additional reserves and successfully developing them.

 

We describe our Strategic Plan under “Item 4.  Information on the Company—The Company—Strategic Plan.” The ability to achieve our long-term growth objectives depends on discovering or acquiring new reserves as well as successfully developing them. Our exploration activities expose us to the inherent risks of drilling, including the risk that we will not discover commercially productive crude oil or natural gas reserves. The costs associated with drilling wells are often uncertain, and numerous factors beyond our control may cause drilling operations to be curtailed, delayed or cancelled.

 

If we are unable to conduct successful exploration and development of our exploration activities, or if we do not acquire properties having proved reserves, our level of proved reserves will decline. Failure to secure additional reserves may impede us from achieving production targets, and may have a negative effect on our results of operation and financial condition.

 

Our current and planned investments outside Colombia are exposed to political and economic risks.

 

As part of our Strategic Plan, we have begun to operate through business partners, subsidiaries or affiliates outside of Colombia. As of the date hereof, we have investments and subsidiaries incorporated in Peru, Brazil, Bermuda, Panama, the Cayman Islands, Switzerland, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States, and we are analyzing investments in other countries. In connection with making investments, we are and will be subject to risks relating to economic and political conditions, governmental economic actions, such as exchange or price controls or limits on the activities to be performed by us, increases in tax rates, contractual changes, and social and environmental challenges.

 

9
 

 

In addition, we cannot predict the positions of foreign governments relating to the oil and gas industry, land tenure, protection of private property, environmental regulation or taxation; nor can we assure you that future governments will maintain a generally favorable business climate and economic policies. Any changes in the economic policies or regulations by the governments of the countries where we own investments may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our participation in deep water drilling in conjunction with our business partners involves certain risks and costs, which may be outside of our control.

 

In association with our business partners, we have undertaken deep water exploratory drilling in the U.S. Gulf Coast and in Brazil. Additionally, as of December 31, 2012, we were involved in 19 off-shore exploratory and production projects in Colombia that involve deep-water drilling, of which we act as operators in four, while Equion acts as operator in two. Our deep water drilling activities present several risks such as the risk of spills, explosions in platforms and drilling operations, and natural disasters. The occurrence of any of these events or other incidents could result in personal injuries, loss of life, severe environmental damage with the resulting containment, clean-up and repair expenses, equipment damage and liability in civil and administrative proceedings. Heightened risks and costs associated with deep water drilling may have a negative effect on our results of operations, financial condition and reputation.

 

As a result of the oil spill in the Macondo field in the U.S. Gulf Coast in April 2010, significant concerns regarding the safety of deep water drilling had been raised and regulation in different countries has changed. In association with our business partners, which act as operators, we are currently drilling and have plans to drill exploratory wells in the U.S. Gulf Coast and Brazil. Since we have no control over these types of foreign government regulations, they may negatively impact the timing of our deep water drilling operations and consequently our results of operations and financial condition.

 

Our drilling activities are capital intensive and may not be productive.

 

Drilling for crude oil and natural gas involves numerous risks, including the risk that we will not encounter commercially productive crude oil or natural gas reservoirs. The cost of drilling, completing and operating wells is high and uncertain, and drilling operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of a variety of factors, including:

 

· unexpected drilling conditions;

 

· pressure or irregularities in formations;

 

· security problems;

 

· theft;

 

· sabotage;

 

· terrorist attacks;

 

· equipment failures or accidents;

 

· fires, explosions, blow-outs and surface cratering;

 

· title problems;

 

· delays or cancellation of environmental licenses;

 

· other adverse weather conditions and natural disasters; and

 

· shortages or delays in the availability or in the delivery of equipment.

 

10
 

 

Certain of our future drilling activities may not be successful and, if unsuccessful, this failure could reduce the ratio at which we replace our reserves, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. While all drilling, whether developmental or exploratory, involves risks, exploratory drilling involves greater risks of dry holes or failure to find commercial quantities of hydrocarbons. Because of the percentage of our capital budget devoted to higher-risk exploratory projects, it is likely that we may in the future experience significant exploration and dry hole expenses.

 

Increased competition from local and foreign crude oil companies may have a negative impact on our ability to gain access to additional crude oil and natural gas reserves in Colombia.

 

The ANH is the governmental entity responsible for promoting oil and gas investments in Colombia, establishing terms of reference for exploration rounds and assigning exploration blocks to oil and gas companies. Prior to the enactment of Decree Law 1760 of 2003, we had an automatic right to explore any territory in Colombia and to enter into joint venture agreements with foreign and local oil companies. Under current regulations, we are entitled to bid for any exploration blocks offered for exploration by the ANH and we compete under the same conditions as other domestic and foreign oil and gas companies, receiving no special treatment. We or other oil companies may request the ANH to directly assign exploration blocks which have not been previously reserved by that Agency, depending on exceptional situations that are defined on Accord 04 of 2012. Our ability to obtain access to potential production fields also depends on our ability to evaluate and select potential hydrocarbon-producing fields and to adequately bid for these exploration fields.

 

Our strategies include international expansion where we face competition from local market players and international oil companies that have experience exploring in other countries.

 

If we are unable to adequately compete with local and foreign oil companies, or if we cannot enter into joint ventures with market players with properties where we could potentially find additional reserves, we may be conducting exploration activities in less attractive blocks, and we could reduce our market share participation. If we fail to maintain our current market position in Colombia, our results of operations and financial conditions may be adversely affected.

 

Our future performance depends on the successful development and deployment of new technologies and the knowledge to apply and improve them.

 

Technology, knowledge and innovation are essential to our business, especially for improvements in the production of heavy crude oil, the exploitation of mature fields and the development of non-conventional hydrocarbons. If we do not develop the right technology or do not obtain the expertise to operate new technology or to improve our processes, do not have access to, or deploy the knowledge necessary to apply and improve such technology effectively, the execution of our Strategic Plan, our profitability and our earnings may be adversely affected.

 

Legislation and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing and other drilling activities for non-conventional oil and gas reserves could increase the cost of implementing our Strategic Plan and the future costs of doing business or cause delays and adversely affect our operations.

 

Hydraulic fracturing is a commonly used process that involves injecting water, sand, and small volumes of chemicals into the wellbore to fracture the hydrocarbon-bearing rock thousands of feet below the surface to facilitate higher flow of hydrocarbons into the wellbore.  Our Strategic Plan contemplates the use of hydraulic fracturing in the production of oil and natural gas from certain reservoirs, especially shale formations. We currently do not have information about any proposals of regulations concerning of hydraulic fracturing beyond the regulation already in place, which has allowed the use of this technique of reservoir stimulation for decades in Colombia. However, various initiatives in regions outside of Colombia with substantial shale gas resources have been or may be proposed or implemented to regulate hydraulic fracturing practices, limit water withdrawals and water use, require disclosure of fracturing fluid constituents, restrict which additives may be used, or implement temporary or permanent bans on hydraulic fracturing. If Colombia adopts similar regulations, which is something we cannot anticipate right now, the imposition of stringent regulatory and permitting requirements related to the practice of hydraulic fracturing in Colombia could significantly increase the cost of or cause delays in the implementation of our Strategic Plan and adversely affect our operations.

 

11
 

 

We may be subject to substantial risks relating to our development of exploration activities outside Colombia.

 

We began exploration activities outside Colombia in 2006 through our Brazilian subsidiary, Ecopetrol Oleo é Gas Do Brasil Ltda. Our foreign subsidiaries have subsequently entered into a number of joint venture exploration agreements with regional and international oil companies to explore blocks in Peru, Brazil and the U.S. Gulf Coast. The results of operations and financial condition of our subsidiaries in these countries may be adversely affected not only by risks associated with hydrocarbon exploration and production but also by fluctuations in their local economies, political instability and government actions, including: imposition of price controls; imposition of restrictions on hydrocarbon exports; fluctuation of local currencies against the Peso; nationalization of oil and gas reserves; increases in export tax and income tax rates for crude oil and oil products; and unilateral (governmental) institutional and contractual changes, including controls on investments and limitations on new projects.

 

We have limited experience exploring outside Colombia, where we are the incumbent operator. We may face new and unexpected risks involving environmental requirements that exceed those currently faced by us. Additionally, we may be exposed to legal disputes with foreign regulators. For example, we were awarded block Tucano-156 in Brazil in the 8th round of 2006. However, in August 2011, the Ministry of Mines and Energy of Brazil ( Ministério de Minas e Energía ) confirmed that the government would not sign any contract awarded in the 8th round of 2006, after the National Energy Policy Council ( Conselho Nacional de Política Energética ) decided to annul the bidding process. We may also experience the imposition of restrictions on hydrocarbon exploration and export, or increases in export tax or income tax rates for crude oil and natural gas.

 

If one or more of these risks described above were to materialize, we might not achieve the strategic objectives in our international operations, which may negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.

 

We may incur losses and spend time and money defending pending lawsuits and arbitrations.

 

We are currently a party to several legal proceedings filed against us. We are also subject to labor-related lawsuits filed by current and former employees in connection with pension plans and retirement benefits. As of December 31, 2012, we were a party to 2,658 legal proceedings relating to civil, administrative, environmental, tax, and labor claims filed against us of which 659 met the accounting threshold for an accrual provision. We allocate substantial amounts of money and time to defend these claims. These claims involve substantial sums of money as well as other remedies. See Notes 19 and 31 to our consolidated financial statements and “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

 

Our natural gas production may not be able to keep up with our natural gas commitments.

 

We are party to certain natural gas supply contracts that have firm gas commitments. If we are unable to deliver natural gas to supply these contract clients, such as due to cuts in operations, delays in new projects for production facilities or the acceleration of the decline in our gas production, we may be required to compensate such contract customers for our failure to supply natural gas. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Marketing and Supply—Natural Gas Distribution.” Both situations may negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.

 

During 2012, delays in the start of new projects, mainly the Planta de Gas Cupiagua and those for increasing the production capacity at the Guajira fields resulted in fines claimed by our clients. Such delays were mainly caused by the process to obtain environmental licenses for building the pipeline Cupiagua – Cusiana, landslides due to weather conditions and isolated strikes by workers in the project area from other oil and gas companies. During 2010, 2011 and 2012, the fines paid in compensation for non-delivery of natural gas were Ps$85.2 billion (approximately US$44.5 million), Ps$2.5 billion (approximately US$1.3 million) and Ps$9.2 billion (approximately US$5.2 million), respectively.

 

We are not permitted by law to own more than 25% of a natural gas transportation company, which may not allow us to transport new natural gas reserves to distribution points and to our customers.

 

We discovered natural gas reserves in the Cusiana and Cupiagua fields for which transportation capacity is limited. New natural gas transportation infrastructure may not be available to transport natural gas from new or existing fields to consumption areas. Furthermore, we are prohibited by law from holding more than 25% of the equity of any natural gas transportation company and consequently there can be no assurance that the transportation capacity necessary to transport natural gas is built by third parties. Due to the limited number of natural gas transportation companies currently operating in Colombia we may be required to enter into agreements on terms that are not as favorable to us as they could be if there were multiple transportation companies.

 

If we are unable to obtain transportation services to transport natural gas from new discoveries to our customers or to regions where natural gas is demanded, we may not be able to develop these reserves, which may result in impairment of the related assets and would not allow us to recover the capital expenditures invested to make these natural gas discoveries.

 

12
 

 

In addition, at the end of 2011, we had five medium-term supply contracts with gas-fired power plants that required us to deliver natural gas in Barrancabermeja.  In 2012, four of those contracts ended and we currently have only a medium-term supply contract,  with one gas-fired power plant that requires us to deliver natural gas in Barrancabermeja. I f we were unable to find the necessary transportation, we could be unable to meet our obligation with those power generators, which could result in us having to pay monetary fines.

 

Our operations could be affected by conflicts with labor unions.

 

In the past, we have been affected by strikes and work stoppages promoted by our own and our industry’s labor unions. These strikes have been both politically and contract-related, especially during collective bargaining negotiations. In April 2009, we entered into an agreement with the Unión Sindical Obrera de la Industria del Petróleo , or USO, one of our industry labor unions, to restore trust between USO and us with open communication and transparency as the main principles.

 

Additionally, on August 22, 2009, as a result of consensual negotiations, we entered into a new five-year collective bargaining agreement with three of the most significant industry labor unions: USO, Asociación de Directivos Profesionales , Técnicos y Trabajadores de las Empresas de la Rama de Actividad Económica del Recurso Natural del Petróleo y sus Derivados de Colombia , or ADECO, and Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de Empresas Operadoras, Contratistas , Subcontratistas de Servicios y Actividades de la Industria del Petróleo y Similares , or SINDISPETROL. The new collective bargaining agreement was effective as of July 1, 2009 and covers salaries, healthcare, education, housing, transportation, meals, cultural activities, union rights and guarantees, among other aspects. Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de Empresas Operadoras , or SINCOPETROL, the Company’s labor union, neither presented any list of claims to us nor objected to the bargaining agreement, and as a result, we do not have a labor conflict with SINCOPETROL.

 

During 2011, there were two work stoppages promoted by USO in Barrancabermeja in support of the protests by employees at Pacific Rubiales, an unaffiliated oil and gas company in Colombia. On June 19, 2012 and December 22, 2012, USO members protested the creation of our subsidiary Cenit Transporte y Logística de Hidrocarburos S.A.S, or Cenit.  These protests did not materially affect our operations. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Employees.”

 

We cannot assure you that we will not experience labor unrest in the future. In the event relations with our labor unions deteriorate, which could result in strikes, work stoppages or even sabotage, our results of operations and financial condition could be negatively affected.

 

We may not be able to achieve our corporate goals if we face difficulty in finding competent successors to our current management and employees.

 

Our growth strategy and the successful achievement of our corporate goals depend on the competence of our management and employees, and our ability to retain top talent. However, if our managers and employees decide to retire or leave us for other reasons, it may be difficult for us to find adequate successors with the required skills, knowledge, leadership and qualifications for the job. In addition, we may face difficulties in retaining our key managers and employees because of the high level of competition for human resources with experience and knowledge in the oil and gas industries. Furthermore, our compensation structure may not be able to meet industry levels and as a result our key employees may leave for jobs offering higher compensation. We also may face difficulties acquiring or developing the optimal set of professional skills and talent required to reach and sustain our performance under international standards. These difficulties, in turn, may negatively affect our results. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Employees.”

 

Our activities may be interrupted or affected by external factors, such as abnormal weather conditions, natural disasters and third-party acts.

 

We are exposed to several risks that may partially interrupt our activities. These risks include, among others, fire disasters, explosions, natural disasters such as earthquakes, landslides, volcanic eruptions, tropical storms, hurricanes and floods, criminal acts and acts of terror, malfunction of pipelines and emission of toxic substances.

 

For instance, in 2011 we were affected by weather conditions that intensified the strength of the average rain season in Colombia, causing landslides due to the abnormal concentration of water in the soil. These abnormal landslides affected transportation of crude oil by trucks, transportation of crude oil, natural gas and products by pipelines and the normal operation of our production fields and Reficar, which experienced floods at its facilities also as a result of torrential rains.

 

13
 

 

As a result of the occurrence of any of the above, our activities could be significantly affected or paralyzed. These risks could result in property damage, loss of revenue, loss of life, pollution and harm to the environment, among others. If any of these occur, we may be exposed to economic sanctions, fines or penalties, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. On December 23, 2011, our Salgar-Cartago pipeline ruptured. We believe that this incident occurred as a result of a creep movement as a consequence of severe weather conditions in the area, causing the surrounding soil to exercise strong pressure on the pipeline, causing it to rupture. The spilled gasoline from the pipeline subsequently came into contact with a heat source which ignited it causing several explosions, resulted in 33 fatalities, 77 injuries, and damaged and destroyed property. On December 11, 2011, our Caño Limón – Coveñas oil pipeline ruptured as a result of a soil motion caused by the heavy rainy season. While the accident did not result in any fatalities, it resulted in crude oil spilling into the Iscala creek. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Transportation Infrastructure—Incidents at Transportation Facilities.”

 

We conduct exploration and production activities in areas classified as indigenous reserves and Afro-Colombian lands.

 

We carry out and plan to carry out exploration and production activities in areas classified by the Government as indigenous reserves ( resguardos ) and Afro-Colombian lands ( territorios colectivos ). We may not begin to explore for or produce hydrocarbons in these regions until we reach an agreement with the indigenous or Afro-Colombian communities living on these lands. Generally these consultations last between four and six months, but may be significantly delayed if we cannot reach an agreement. For example, we conduct operations in areas of the Northeastern region, which are inhabited by the U’wa community. Commencement of operations on two blocks in this region have been delayed for 20 years and ten years, respectively as of December 2012 because the community has refused to participate in the consultation process and the applicable legislation does not contemplate any alternatives in such a case. Similarly, some of our exploration operations in the Southern region have been delayed for seven years as a result of the presence of the Kofan community who oppose our presence and activities in the reservation. We may be exposed to similar delays due to opposition from local communities in other countries where we carry out exploration activities in indigenous reserves, such as Peru. If our activities endanger the conservation and preservation of these cultural minorities or their identities or beliefs, we may not be able to explore regions with good prospects. We may face similar risks in other jurisdictions where we have initiated exploration activities, which could have a negative effect on our operations.

 

Our operations are subject to social risks.

 

Our activities are subject to social risks, including protests by communities surrounding our operations. For example, during the construction of the Bicentenario oil pipeline, construction was suspended as a result of lockouts used by communities in the area of influence of the oil pipeline to demand greater participation of the Government and social investment, as well as greater participation of private companies in the development plans of towns in the departments of Arauca and Casanare. While we are committed to operating in a socially responsible manner, we may face opposition from local communities with respect to our current and future projects and such opposition could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Currency fluctuations and an appreciation of the Peso against the U.S. dollar could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations given that approximately 65% of our revenues are derived from foreign sales.

 

Approximately 65% of our sales are made in the international markets. The impact of fluctuations in exchange rates, especially the Peso/U.S. dollar rate on our operations has been and may continue to be material. In addition, a substantial share of our liquid assets are held in U.S. dollars or indexed to foreign currencies and gain value when the Peso depreciates against the U.S. dollar and lose value when the Peso appreciates against the U.S. dollar. We control our currency risk using natural hedging when possible, by maintaining funds in U.S. dollars and Pesos to meet our expenses in its respective currency. In addition, the obligations derived from our U.S. dollar-denominated debt are naturally hedged by our funds in the same currency. This situation partially mitigates any adverse effect that currency risk may have over the financial statements of the Company.

 

The U.S. dollar/Peso exchange rate has shown some instability in the last several years, particularly with the Peso experiencing significant fluctuations during the last twelve months. The Peso appreciated 2.7% on average against the U.S. dollar in 2012, and depreciated 0.6%, on average, during the first three months of 2013. When the Peso appreciates against the U.S. dollar, our revenues from exports, when translated into Pesos, decrease. However, imported goods, oil services and interest on external debt denominated in U.S. dollars become less expensive for us. Conversely, when the Peso depreciates against the U.S. dollar, our revenues from exports, when translated into Pesos, increase, and our imports and external debt service become more expensive. We cannot assure you that measures adopted by the government of Colombia and the Colombian Central Bank (Banco de la República de Colombia) such as the purchase of U.S. dollars in the foreign exchange market in response to the appreciation of the Peso, and  the government’s intervention through the purchase of significant amounts of U.S. dollars in the spot market to pay interest and principal on foreign bonds coming due or to increase the size of the oil-stability fund will be sufficient to control this instability. Future volatility in the exchange rate of the Peso to the U.S. dollar may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and our ability to comply with our obligations under our indebtedness, pay dividends or make other distributions to our shareholders.

 

14
 

 

Our ability to access the credit and capital markets on favorable terms to obtain funding for our capital projects may be limited due to the deterioration of these markets and the authorizations we need before incurring any financial indebtedness.

 

We expect to make significant expenditures in capital and operations to reach the corporate goals established by our Strategic Plan. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Company—Strategic Plan.” Our ability to fund these expenditures is dependent on our ability to access the capital necessary to finance the construction of these facilities on terms acceptable to us. In recent years, domestic and global financial markets and economic conditions have been weak and volatile and have contributed significantly to a substantial deterioration in the credit and capital markets. A new financial crisis or an expansion of the current European sovereign debt crisis could also make it more difficult for us and our subsidiaries to access international capital markets and finance our operations and capital expenditures in the future on terms acceptable to us. These conditions, along with significant write-offs in the financial services sector and the re-pricing of credit risk, can make it difficult for us to obtain funding for our capital needs on favorable terms. As a result, we may be forced to revise the timing and scope of these projects as necessary to adapt to existing market and economic conditions, or access the financial markets on terms less favorable, therefore negatively affecting our results of operation and financial condition.

 

In addition, under applicable regulation, the Government, through the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit, must authorize all indebtedness of governmental entities and Nation-controlled companies through a majority equity stake. Consequently, all of our own indebtedness and our subsidiaries’ indebtedness, except for our foreign subsidiaries or those subsidiaries in which we hold minority interest, must be previously authorized by the Colombian Ministry of Finance and Public Credit. As such, our indebtedness is subject to the Government’s time frames and policies, and we cannot assure you that such authorizations would be granted in a timely fashion or at all.

 

We may be exposed to increases in interest rates, thereby increasing our financial costs.

 

We may incur debt locally and in the international capital markets and, consequently, may be affected by changes in prevailing interest rates. If market interest rates increase, our financing expenses may increase, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

 

Financial markets have not recovered from the recent global economic crisis and remain vulnerable to the European sovereign debt crisis that affects the liquidity of commercial banks and investment funds. If recovery falters or takes a few years longer than expected, the costs of raising funds in debt and equity capital markets may increase and impair our ability to obtain capital on terms acceptable to us.

 

We are subject to extensive environmental regulations in Colombia and in the other countries in which we operate and under certain of our credit agreements, we are under an obligation to comply with international environmental standards.

 

Our operations are subject to extensive national, state and local environmental regulations in Colombia. Environmental rules and regulations are applicable to our exploration, production, refining, transportation, supply and marketing activities, as well as the biofuels we produce. These regulations establish, among other things, quality standards for hydrocarbon products, air emissions and greenhouse gases, water discharges and waste disposal, environmental standards for abandoned crude oil wells, remedies for soil, water pollution and the general storage, handling, transportation and treatment of hydrocarbons in Colombia. Currently, all exploratory projects drilling in areas that do not yet have a license must undergo an environmental impact assessment and must receive an environmental license from the Ministry of the Environment. The Ministry of the Environment routinely inspects our crude oil fields, refineries and other production sites and may decide to open investigations which may result in fines, restrictions on operations or other sanctions in connection with potential non-compliance with environmental laws.

 

We are also subject to regional environmental regulations issued by the corporaciones autónomas regionales, or regional environmental authorities, which oversee compliance with each region’s environmental regulations. If we fail to comply with any of these national or regional environmental regulations, we could be subject to administrative and criminal penalties, including warnings, fines and closure orders of our facilities. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Overview by Business Segment—Environmental Matters.”

 

15
 

 

Environmental compliance has become more stringent in Colombia in recent years and as a result we have allocated a greater percentage of our expenditures for compliance with these laws and regulations. If environmental laws continue to impose additional costs and expenses on us, and as new laws and regulations relating to climate change become applicable to us, we may need to reduce our investments on strategic projects in order to allocate funds to environmental compliance. We are exposed to delays in obtaining environmental licenses from ANLA ( Asociación Nacional de Licencias Ambientales , the government agency which is in charge of environmental licenses), which can lead to cost overruns or to changes in the investment plans of the company. These additional costs may have a negative impact on the profitability of the projects we intend to undertake or may make them economically unattractive, in turn having a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

 

We are subject to foreign environmental regulations for the exploratory activities conducted by us outside Colombia. Failure to comply with foreign environmental regulations may result in investigations by foreign regulators, which could lead to fines, warnings or temporary suspensions of our operations, which could have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Under certain of our credit agreements, we are under an obligation to comply with international environmental standards established by our lenders or by multilateral institutions. Failure to comply with such environmental standards could result in an event of default under the relevant credit agreements that we, or our subsidiaries, have entered into, which would affect our financial condition. For instance, the credit agreements executed by Ecopetrol in order to finance purchases of U.S. goods and services and the credit facilities executed by Reficar for the financing of its expansion and modernization project, include an obligation to comply with the U.S.-Exim Environmental Procedures and Guidelines, and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Common Approaches on Environment and Officially Supported Export Credits.

 

Our activities face operational risks that may affect the health and safety of our workforce and of the local communities.

 

Some of our operations are developed in remote and dangerous locations which involve health and safety risks that could affect our workforce. Under Colombian law and industrial safety regulations we are required to have health and safety practices that minimize risks and health issues faced by our workforce. Failure to comply with health and safety regulations may lead to investigations by health officials that could result in lawsuits or fines.

 

We may be required to incur additional costs and expenses to allocate funds to industrial safety and health compliance under Colombian law and industrial safety regulations. Additionally, if any operational incident occurs that affects local communities in nearby areas, we will need to incur additional costs and expenses in order to return affected areas to normality. These additional costs may have a negative impact on the profitability of the projects we may decide to undertake.

 

In addition, we may be subject to foreign health and safety regulations for our exploratory activities conducted outside Colombia. Foreign health and safety regulations may be more severe than those established under Colombian law and, therefore, we may be required to make additional investments to comply with those regulations.

 

We have made significant investments in acquisitions and we may not realize the expected value.

 

We have acquired interests in several companies in Colombia and abroad. See “Item 4. Information on the Company.” Obtaining the expected benefits of the acquisitions will depend, in part, on our ability to (1) obtain the expected operational and financial results from these acquisitions, (2) manage disparate operations and integrate distinct corporate cultures and (3) manage our objectives as a corporate group. These efforts may not succeed. Our failure to successfully obtain the expected results from our acquisitions could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our subsidiaries Reficar and Oleoducto Bicentenario are currently engaged in their own construction projects. If they or any other material project is delayed or if its costs exceed our initial estimate, it could affect our operating results and financial condition.

 

Reficar has raised US$3.5 billion through a limited-recourse project financing in which we have acted as sponsor and have provided both a construction guarantee and a debt service guarantee to the project lenders. If the construction project of the upgraded refinery is delayed because of operational problems, due to, but not limited to, labor productivity or unavailability of construction material in the development of the project, or if the upgraded refinery does not reach the expected performance level in terms of the quality of products and/or volumes produced, the project lenders could request that we act on the guarantees and assume the payment obligations of Reficar, which would require us to make additional capital contributions thereby affecting our operating results and financial condition. Additionally, delays in the implementation of the project may result in larger capital expenditures, which could increase the overall cost of the project and impact our financial position.

 

16
 

 

In February 2013, Reficar requested contributions from Ecopetrol under the Construction Support Agreement in an amount of US$500 million, of which US$250 million has already been provided, with the remaining amount to be supplied throughout the rest of the year. As the project’s budget and schedule are being revised, we may be required to provide additional funding in excess of this amount. Any increase in the project’s capital expenditures is expected to be funded under the Construction Support Agreement between Reficar and Ecopetrol.

 

Oleoducto Bicentenario is in the first phase of construction of the Araguaney-Coveñas pipeline, which connects the Araguaney and Banadía loading facilities, and which is expected to be the largest of its kind in Colombia. Its estimated investment of US$2,035 million is expected to be financed by the project partners’ equity participation amounting to a 30% interest and the remaining 70% through loans from local banks, which have approved Ps$2.1 trillion and of which Ps$1,295 billion (approximately US$732 million) has been drawn. The first phase of the construction is expected to permit the evacuation of at least 110 thousand bpd, with a pipeline of 230 kilometers in length and a diameter of 42 inches. Delays in the completion of the first phase of this project due in part to events such as lockouts from communities in the areas of project construction demanding more social investment from the government, security issues, attacks by guerrilla groups, and unfavorable weather conditions could affect our production in certain fields and would prevent us from having the necessary infrastructure for crude oil transportation, negatively impacting our financial position.

 

Other investment projects that are part of our Strategic Plan could face similar planning and implementation problems, which could impact the competitiveness of our programs and projects, affecting our results and expected financial condition.

 

Our results may be affected by the performance of our business partners, as many of our operations are executed under association and joint venture agreements with business partners.

 

Many of our operations are executed through associations, joint ventures and other agreements with our business partners. Consequently, we depend on the performance of our business partners. The poor performance of any of our business partners, especially in those projects in which we do not act as operators, could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we are exposed to the risk of not finding business partners with the appropriate skills and performance that we require for our projects.

 

Our insurance policies do not cover all liabilities and may not be available for all risks.

 

Our insurance policies do not cover all liabilities, and insurance may not be available for all risks. There can be no assurance that incidents will not occur in the future, that insurance will adequately cover the entire scope or extent of our losses or that we will not be found liable in connection with claims arising from these and other events, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

A failure in our information technology systems or cyber security attacks may adversely affect our financial results.

 

We depend on the reliability and security of our information technology systems to conduct certain exploration, development and production activities, process and record financial and operating data, communicate with our employees and business partners, and for many other activities related to our business. Our information technology systems may fail or have other significant shortcomings due to operational system flaws or employee misuse, tampering or manipulation. In addition, we may become the target of cyber attacks or information security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of proprietary and other information. Any of these occurrences could disrupt our business, result in potential liability or reputational damage or otherwise have an adverse effect on our financial results. Although we have not experienced any material losses relating to failure of our information technology systems or cyber incidents, there can be no assurance that we will not suffer such losses in the future.

 

Risks relating to our ADSs

 

Holders of our ADSs may encounter difficulties in exercising their voting rights.

 

The procedures established in the Deposit Agreement provide that holders of our ADSs are entitled to instruct our current depositary, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., to vote on shareholder matters by giving instructions, in advance of a shareholders’ meeting, to such depositary. Under Colombian law, Ecopetrol is not required to request proxies from our existing shareholders and, therefore, shareholders may not receive notice in time to instruct the depositary to vote their shares.

 

17
 

 

Pursuant to the Deposit Agreement, holders of our ADSs can instruct the depositary to vote the common shares separately. However, this issue has been subject to different regulatory interpretations, which may limit the ability of the depositary to vote separately. Under prior regulatory interpretations, the depositary could be required to vote the underlying common shares in a single block (presumably reflecting the majority vote of the ADS holders). In the future, the Colombian regulatory authorities may change their interpretation as to how the voting rights should be exercised by ADS holders, and such possible interpretation could adversely affect the value of the common shares and ADSs

 

Our ADSs holders may be subject to restrictions on foreign investment in Colombia.

 

Colombia’s International Investment Statute regulates the manner in which non-Colombian residents can invest in Colombia and participate in the Colombian securities market. Among other requirements, Colombian law requires foreign investors to register certain foreign exchange transactions with the Colombian Central Bank and outlines the necessary procedures to authorize certain types of foreign investments. Colombian law requires that certain foreign exchange transactions, including international investment in foreign currency between Colombian residents and non-Colombian residents, must be made through authorized foreign exchange market participants. Any income or expenses under our American Depositary Receipt, or ADR, program must be made through the foreign exchange market.

 

Investors acquiring our ADRs are not required to register with the Colombian Central Bank, as they will benefit from the registration to be obtained by the custodian for our common shares underlying the ADRs in Colombia. If investors in ADRs choose to surrender their ADRs and withdraw common shares, they must register their investment in the common shares as a portfolio investment through their local representative, which may be a brokerage firm, trust company or investment management companies supervised by the Superintendency of Finance. Investors will only be allowed to transfer dividends abroad after their foreign investment registration procedure with the Colombian Central Bank has been completed. Investors withdrawing common shares could incur expenses and/or suffer delays in the application process. The failure of a non-resident investor to report or register foreign exchange transactions with the Colombian Central Bank relating to investments in Colombia on a timely basis may prevent the investor from remitting dividends, or initiate an investigation that may result in a fine. In the future, the Government, the Colombian Congress or the Colombian Central Bank may amend Colombia’s International Investment Statute or the foreign investment rules, which could result in more restrictive rules and could negatively affect trading of our ADSs.

 

Additionally, Colombia currently has a floating exchange rate system; however, other restrictive rules for the exchange rate system could be implemented in the future. In the event that a more restrictive exchange rate system is implemented, the depositary may experience difficulties converting Peso amounts into U.S. dollars to remit dividend payments. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Exchange Controls.”

 

Holders of our ADSs may not be able to effect service of process on us, our directors or executive officers within the United States, which may limit your recovery in any foreign judgment you obtain against us.

 

We are a mixed economy company organized under the laws of Colombia. In addition, most of our Directors and executive officers reside outside the United States. All or a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of these persons are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for you to effect service of process within the United States upon us or these persons or to enforce judgments against us or them in U.S. courts obtained in such courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Colombian courts determine whether to enforce a U.S. judgment predicated on the U.S. securities laws through a procedural system known as exequatur . For a description of these limitations, see “Enforcement of Civil Liabilities.”

 

The protections afforded to minority shareholders in Colombia are different from those in the United States, and may be difficult to enforce.

 

Under Colombian law, the protections afforded to minority shareholders are different from those in the United States. In particular, the legal framework with respect to shareholder disputes is substantially different under Colombian law than U.S. law and there are different procedural requirements for commencing shareholder lawsuits, such as shareholder derivative suits. As a result, it may be more difficult for our minority shareholders to enforce their rights against us or our Directors or controlling shareholder than it would be for shareholders of a U.S. company.

 

18
 

 

ADRs do not have the same tax benefits as other equity investments in Colombia.

 

Although ADRs represent Ecopetrol’s common shares, for Colombian tax purposes, ADRs are securities different from their underlying assets. Therefore, ADR holders are not entitled to the tax benefits granted to holders of the common shares. Such tax benefits are, among others, those relating to dividends and profits derived from sale of Colombian common shares. For further information see “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Colombian Tax Considerations.”

 

Judgments of Colombian courts with respect to our ADSs will be payable only in Pesos.

 

If proceedings are brought in the courts of Colombia seeking to enforce the rights of ADS holders of common shares, we will be required to discharge our obligation amounts in Pesos. Under Colombian laws, an obligation in Colombia to pay amounts denominated in foreign currency may only be satisfied in Colombian currency at the Representative Market Exchange Rate of the date the judgment is obtained, and such amounts are then adjusted to reflect exchange rate variations through the effective payment date.

 

The relative volatility and illiquidity of the Colombian securities markets may substantially limit our investors’ ability to sell our ADSs at the price and time they desire.

 

Investing in securities that are traded in emerging markets, such as Colombia, often involves greater risk when compared to other world markets, and these investments are generally considered to be more speculative in nature.

 

The Colombian securities market is substantially smaller, less liquid, more concentrated and can be more volatile than other securities markets. The Colombian Stock Exchange ( Bolsa de Valores de Colombia ), or BVC, had a market capitalization of approximately Ps$483,295 billion (US$273,321 million using the closing rate for 2012) as of December 31, 2012, a 19.6% increase when compared with the amount at the end of 2011, a daily average trading volume of approximately Ps$188,212 million (US$104,665 million, using the average exchange rate for 2012), a 15.8% increase when compared to the volume in 2011. In contrast, the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, had a market capitalization of US$14 trillion as of December 31, 2012, and a daily trading volume of approximately US$37 billion in 2012.

 

As of December 31, 2012, our shares represented the highest market capitalization of the BVC with 43% of the total. In addition, they had the second highest trading volume in the BVC, averaging Ps$26,146 million traded per day. In the last quarter of 2012, our shares represented 26.6% of the Índice General de la Bolsa de Valores de Colombia , or IGBC, stock market index, 12.61% of the COL20, a stock market index that includes the top 20 traded stocks in the BVC, and 20.2% of the COLCAP, a stock price volatility index.

 

Given the current ownership structure of our shares, it may be difficult for you to purchase large quantities of shares from a single shareholder. We cannot assure you that a liquid trading market for our ADSs will develop or, if developed, that it will be maintained. Without a liquid trading market, the ability of investors in our ADSs to sell them at the desired price and time could be substantially limited.

 

We are not required to disclose as much information to investors as a U.S. issuer is required to disclose.

 

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Superintendency of Finance and the BVC. The corporate disclosure requirements that apply to us may not be equivalent to the disclosure requirements that apply to a U.S. issuer and, as a result, you may receive less interim information about us than you would receive from a U.S. issuer.

 

Risks relating to Colombia’s political and regional environment

 

Colombia has experienced internal security issues that have had or could have a negative effect on the Colombian economy and on us.

 

Colombia has experienced internal security issues, primarily due to the activities of guerrillas, paramilitary groups, drug cartels and criminal bands known as Bacrim . From time to time, guerrillas target crude oil and multi-purpose pipelines, including the Oleoducto Transandino, Caño Limón-Coveñas and Ocensa pipelines, and other related infrastructure disrupting our activities and those of our business partners. During 2011 and 2012, these attacks have intensified. On several occasions, guerilla attacks have resulted in unscheduled shut-downs of transportation systems in order to repair sections of pipelines that have been damaged and to undertake clean-up activities, as well as in deferral of production in certain fields. Guerrilla groups and other illegal armed groups also attacked natural gas transportation infrastructure. Although we do not have any interest in natural gas transportation assets, these attacks have affected our natural gas production. These activities, their possible escalation and the effects associated with them have had and may have, in the future, a negative impact on the Colombian economy or on us, which may affect our customers, employees, assets or the environment, with resulting containment, clean-up and repair expenses. In the context of this complex security situation, allegations and court judgments have been levied against members of the Colombian Congress and on government officials for possible ties with illegal groups. This situation may have a negative impact on the credibility of the Colombian government, which could in turn have a negative impact on the Colombian economy or on us in the future .

 

19
 

 

Recently, the Colombian government began negotiations with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, the largest guerrilla group in Colombia, with a view to end the armed conflict. This is the latest attempt in a series of unsuccessful negotiations between the Colombian government and the FARC. While the process is ongoing, military operations and hostilities continue. If the negotiations fail, the intensity of the internal armed conflict could increase, resulting in a deterioration of Colombia’s national security and, consequently, negatively affecting our operating results.

 

There have been certain events in Colombia and abroad, which have resulted in political tensions between Colombia and some of its neighboring countries.

 

Diplomatic relations between Colombia and some of its neighboring countries, in particular Ecuador and Venezuela, have been very tense in the past. These political tensions were heightened by the Colombian Government’s allegations that neighboring countries are supporting the guerilla groups, as well as by claims made by Venezuela stating that the Colombian army has entered its territory while in pursuit of FARC members. The Colombian army and air force continue to combat FARC members in the Colombian territory, including Colombia’s borders with neighboring countries. Although relations with these countries have stabilized recently, there can be no assurance that similar allegations could not be made again that may result in new and heightened tensions with Colombia’s neighbors, which have had in the past, and could have in the future, a negative impact on Colombia’s economy and general security situation.

 

Companies operating in Colombia, including us, are subject to the prevailing economic conditions and the investment climate in Colombia, which may be less stable than the prevailing economic conditions and investment climate in developed countries.

 

Market prices of securities issued by Colombian companies, including us, are subject to the prevailing economic conditions in Colombia. A large portion of our assets and operations are located in Colombia and most of our sales are currently derived from our crude oil and natural gas production and the production of our refineries located in Colombia. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations depend to a significant extent on macroeconomic and political conditions prevailing from time to time in Colombia and on the rates of exchange between the Peso and the U.S. dollar.

 

In the past, economic growth in Colombia has been negatively affected by lower foreign direct investment, high inflation rates and the perception of political instability.

 

The investment and security climate in Colombia continues to be tied to the results and performance of President Juan Manuel Santos’s economic, security and social policies and the perception of such policies by foreign investors. Since his election in 2011, President Juan Manuel Santos has continued policies to increase foreign investment in Colombia as well as to improve relations with neighboring countries, which have resulted in economic stability for Colombia. In 2012, Colombia’s annual gross domestic product increased by 4% due principally to an increase of 5.9% in crude oil and mining production. In 2011, Colombia’s annual gross domestic product increased by 6.6% due principally to an increase of 14.4% in crude oil and mining production.

 

If the perception of improved overall security in Colombia deteriorates or if foreign direct investment declines, the Colombian economy may face a downturn, which could negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, the market price of our shares and American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, may be adversely affected by changes in governmental policies, particularly those affecting economic growth, exchange rates, interest rates, inflation and taxes. The Colombian government has changed monetary, fiscal, taxation, labor and other policies over time and has thus influenced the performance of the Colombian economy. We have no control over the extent and timing of government intervention and policies.

 

20
 

 

Adverse developments in the global economy restricting the credit markets may materially and negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

The downturn in the world’s major economies over the past several years and the constraints in the credit markets have heightened, and could continue to heighten, a number of material risks to our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our future prospects. Continued weakness in, and uncertainty about, global economic conditions, and in particular the economic conditions in the United States, could cause businesses to postpone spending in response to tighter credit, negative financial news or declines in income or asset values, which could have a material adverse effect on the demand for goods and international trade which, in turn, could adversely affect the demand for our products. For example, the recent challenges faced by the European Union to stabilize some of its member economies, such as Cyprus, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain, have had international implications affecting the stability of global financial markets, which have hindered economies worldwide. Many member nations in the European Union are addressing the issues with controversial austerity measures. If the European Union monetary policy measures are insufficient to restore confidence and stability to the financial markets, any recovery of the global economy, including the U.S. and European Union economies, could be hindered or reversed, which could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. There could also be a number of follow-on effects from these economic developments and negative economic trends to our business, including customer insolvencies, decreased customer demand, decreased customer liquidity due to tightening in the credit markets and decreased customer ability to fulfill their payment obligations.

 

The recent economic problems affecting the banking system and financial markets and the recent uncertainty in global economic conditions has resulted in a number of adverse effects including tightening in the credit markets, a low level of liquidity in many financial markets, extreme volatility in credit, equity, currency and fixed income markets, instability in the stock market and high unemployment.

 

Financial markets have also recently been affected by concerns over U.S. fiscal policy, as well as the U.S. federal government’s debt ceiling and the federal deficit. These concerns have also renewed discussions relating to a potential downgrade of the long-term sovereign credit rating of the United States. Any actions taken by the U.S. federal government regarding the debt ceiling or the federal deficit or any action taken or threatened by ratings agencies, could significantly impact the global and U.S. economies and financial markets, which could lead to a recession. Our business is closely tied to general economic conditions in the United States, Colombia and other Latin American countries, and any such economic downturn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

Developments and the perception of risk in other countries, especially emerging market countries, may adversely affect the market price of Colombian securities, including our ADSs.

 

Securities issued by Colombian companies may be affected by economic and market conditions in other countries, including other Latin American and emerging market countries. Although economic conditions in Latin American countries and in other emerging market countries may differ significantly from economic conditions in Colombia, investors’ reactions to developments in these other countries may have an adverse effect on the market value of securities of Colombian issuers.

 

Due to past financial crises in several emerging market countries (such as the Asian financial crisis of 1997, the Russian financial crisis of 1998 and the Argentine financial crisis of 2001), the world financial crisis of 2009 and the recent sovereign debt crises in certain European countries, investors may view investments in emerging markets with heightened caution. In the past, as a result of crises in other countries, flows of investments into Colombia have been reduced. Crises in other countries, especially in emerging market countries, may hamper investor enthusiasm for securities of Colombian issuers. If Latin America experiences a new slow-down or if the price for securities of Latin American issuers falls, the price for our ADSs could follow this trend and could be adversely affected.

 

Our controlling shareholder’s interests may be different from those of our minority shareholders.

 

Colombian Law 1118 of 2006 requires the Nation to maintain the majority of our outstanding capital stock. The Nation currently holds 88.49% of our outstanding capital stock, making it our controlling shareholder. The Nation as our controlling shareholder has majority voting rights at the shareholders’ meeting to elect the members of our Board of Directors and approve decisions. The Nation could propose and approve decisions that do not necessarily benefit minority shareholders.

 

Our controlling shareholder may approve dividends at the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting, notwithstanding the interest of minority shareholders, in an amount that results in us having to reduce our capital expenditures, thereby negatively affecting our prospects, results of operations and financial condition. See “Item 8. Financial Information—Dividends.”

 

21
 

 

Additionally, given our controlling shareholder’s interests, it may undertake projects, approve decisions or make announcements about its intentions related to its holding of our capital stock which may not be in our best interest or in the best interest of our minority shareholders, including holders of our ADSs, and could impact the price of our shares or ADSs.

 

Our operations are subject to extensive regulation.

 

The Colombian hydrocarbons industry is subject to extensive regulation and supervision by the Government in matters including the award of exploration and production blocks by the National Hydrocarbon Agency ( Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos ), or ANH, the imposition of specific drilling and exploration obligations, restrictions on production, price controls, capital expenditures and required divestments. Existing regulation applies to virtually all aspects of our operations in Colombia and abroad. The commercialization activities of some of our products also face extensive regulation. Such regulation is subject to change by the applicable regulator affecting our ability to commercialize our products. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Overview by Business Segment—Regulation.”

 

The terms and conditions of the agreements with the ANH under which we explore and produce crude oil and natural gas generally reflect negotiations with the ANH and other governmental authorities and may vary by fields, basins and hydrocarbons discovered.

 

We are required, as are all oil companies undertaking exploratory and production activities in Colombia, to pay a percentage of our production to the Government as royalties. The oil and gas reserve figures included in this annual report are net of such royalties. The Government has modified the royalty program for crude oil and natural gas production several times in the last 20 years, as it has modified the regime regulating new contracts entered into with the Government. Since 2002, the royalty regime for contracts being entered into for crude oil is tied to a scale that begins at 8% for production of up to 5,000 bpd, and increases up to 25% for production above 600,000 bpd. Royalties for natural gas production are also subject to a sliding scale depending on whether the field is on- or off-shore and range between 8% and 25%.

 

In the future, the Government may once again amend royalty payment levels for new contracts and such changes could have an adverse effect on our future exploration and production contracts in Colombia.

 

The Government may delay the reimbursement of gasoline and diesel fuel price differentials.

 

The Government regulates domestic prices of liquid fuels according to international market conditions in order to align domestic prices with trends in international prices. When domestic prices of liquid fuels are lower than international parity prices, the Government is responsible for reimbursing importers or refiners for the difference, which is called the fuel price differential, pursuant to Law 1151 of 2007. Currently, the fuel price differential is calculated on a monthly basis and reported on a quarterly basis, with the corresponding cash payment to be made during the subsequent quarter. In cases of payment delays, refiners are entitled to receive interest on past due amounts.

 

Historically, when domestic prices of liquid fuels were higher than international parity prices, the Government lowered domestic prices. However, towards the end of 2008 as international prices decreased, the Government decided not to lower domestic prices. Instead, the Government kept domestic prices high and allocated the positive difference between domestic fuel prices and the international parity prices to a Fuels Stabilization Fund ( Fondo de Estabilización de Precios de los Combustibles ), or FEPC. Similar to the approach followed by other countries, the FEPC is funded with these excess payments when international prices are low and depleted when international prices are high in order to mitigate domestic price volatility.

 

During 2010, oil refiners, including us, were entitled to fuel price differential payments from the Ministry of Mines and Energy indexed to international prices. However, such payments due to us by the Ministry of Mines and Energy were not made until the fourth quarter of 2011. Similarly, during 2011, the fuel price differential payments corresponding to the first three quarters of the year were not paid until December 2011. The fuel price differential payments due to us as of December 31, 2011, equal Ps$571.8 billion and those for 2012 equal Ps$1,381.5 billion. In April 2013, the Ministry of Mines and Energy paid the corresponding amounts due to us for the fourth quarter of 2011 and first three quarters of 2012, amounting to Ps$1,271.9 billion. The amount due to us, corresponding to the fourth quarter of 2012 and the first quarter of 2013, is equivalent to Ps$390.3 billion.

 

22
 

 

Delays in price differential payments make it difficult to determine when we will collect the amount of any fuel price differentials that become due in the future. Any material delay in the payment of these fuel price differentials by the Government or a significant amendment to Law 1151 of 2007 imposing additional responsibilities on us with respect to fuel price differentials could have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations. On September 30, 2011, the Ministry of Mines and Energy established a new methodology to calculate domestic prices of gasoline and diesel fuel, which sets the maximum monthly variation in refiners’ revenues at 1.5%. Currently, the Colombian Congress is discussing a bill to introduce a new methodology to calculate fuel price differentials, and determine the maximum retail price of gasoline and diesel, including the revenues for the Colombian refineries. There can be no assurance that this bill, if enacted into law, will not negatively affect the amount and timeliness of the fuel price differential payments, which in turn could affect our financial condition and results of operations. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Gasoline and Diesel Price Differentials.”

 

New or higher taxes resulting from changes in tax regulations or the interpretation thereof in Colombia could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

 

New tax laws and regulations, and uncertainties in the interpretation with respect to existing and future tax policies pose risks to us. In recent years, the Colombian Congress and tax authorities have imposed additional taxes and enacted modifications to taxes related to financial transactions, income, value added tax, or VAT, and taxes on net worth. Changes in tax-related laws and regulations, and interpretations thereof, can affect tax burdens by increasing tax rates and fees, creating new taxes, limiting tax deductions, and eliminating tax-based incentives and non-taxed income. In addition, tax authorities and tax courts may interpret tax regulations differently than we do, which could result in tax litigation and associated costs and penalties. For Colombian income tax purposes and, as a general rule, dividends that are distributed from profits taxed at the corporate level are not taxed or subject to withholding tax at the shareholder level. Tax treaty rules might also apply on dividend distributions when a shareholder is a resident in a country that has executed a tax treaty with Colombia. However, this tax treatment may change in the future, and any change could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

 

23
 

 

ITEM 4. Information on the Company

 

The Company

 

We are a vertically integrated oil company with presence in Colombia, Peru, Brazil and the U.S. Gulf Coast. We divide our operations into four business segments: exploration and production; transportation and logistics; refining and petrochemicals; and marketing and supply. We are the largest corporation in Colombia, as measured by revenues, profits, assets, shareholders’ equity, sales, net income and net worth, and we play a key role in the local hydrocarbon market. Our operation does not include natural gas transportation activities due to legal restrictions.

 

Corporate History

 

Ecopetrol is a mixed economy company, incorporated on August 25, 1951, and existing under the laws of Colombia. We have an unlimited term of duration. Our legal name is Ecopetrol S.A. Our principal executive offices are located at Carrera 13 No. 36-24 Bogota, Colombia and our telephone number is +571 234 4000.

 

In 1951, we were incorporated as the Empresa Colombiana de Petróleos as a result of the reversion of the De Mares concession to the Government by the Tropical Oil Company. We began our operations as a governmental industrial and commercial company, responsible for administering Colombia’s hydrocarbon resources. In the same year, we began operating the crude oil fields at La Cira-Infantas and the pipeline that connected that field with the Barrancabermeja refinery and the port of Cartagena. Three years later, the first national seismic study was performed under the De Mares concession which led to the discovery of the Llanito crude oil field in 1960.

 

In 1961, we assumed the direct operation of the Barrancabermeja refinery and continued its transformation into an industrial complex. International Petroleum Colombia Limited or Intercol began the construction of a new facility in Mamonal, Cartagena, where the pipeline terminal of the Andean National Corporation was already located and which also included a loading port. In December 1957, the Cartagena refinery began operations, and in 1974 it was acquired by us.

 

In 1970, we adopted our first bylaws that transformed us into a governmental industrial and commercial company, linked to the Ministry of Mines and Energy. Decree Law 1760 of 2003 renamed us Ecopetrol S.A. and transformed us from an industrial and commercial company into a state-owned corporation by shares linked to the Ministry of Mines and Energy, in order to make us more competitive. Prior to our reorganization our capital expenditures program and access to the credit markets were limited by the Government, which was making its decisions based on its budgetary needs and not on our growth prospects.

 

We have been undergoing a two-step transformation process since 2003: (1) first, from a wholly state-owned entity to a state-owned entity characterized by shares, and then (2) to a mixed economy company, which incorporates private capital, pursuant to law 1118 of 2006, with the initial public offering in November 2007. This two-step process has resulted in a substantial change in the legal framework to which we are subject and in the nature of our relationship with the Nation.

 

In 2006, the Colombian Congress authorized us to issue up to 20% of our voting capital stock in Colombia, subject to the condition that the Nation control at least 80% of our voting capital stock. On November 13, 2007, we placed 4,087,723,771 shares in the BVC, trading under the symbol “ECOPETROL,” which resulted in 482,941 new shareholders and raised approximately Ps$5,723 billion for the sale of 10.1% of our capital stock. On September 30, 2011, we issued a total of 644,185,868 shares in an offering directed exclusively to investors in Colombia. Of the 219,054 investors participating in this offering, 73% were new stockholders. The aggregate proceeds of this offering were Ps$2.38 trillion. As a result of the two offerings made by us, the Nation currently controls 88.49% of our voting capital stock. Since September 18, 2008, our ADSs have been trading on the NYSE under the symbol “EC.” On December 4, 2009, our ADSs began trading on the Lima Stock Exchange under the symbol “EC.” Since March 16, 2011 our ADS’s were delisted from the Lima Stock Exchange. In addition, on August 13, 2010, our ADSs began trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “ECP.” Each ADS represents 20 common shares of the Company.

 

24
 

 

The following table sets forth our recent material acquisitions and the effective date as of which each has been reflected in our operating results.

 

Company     Date     Participation
acquired in
transaction
    Sector      Price (US$) (1)
Polipropileno del Caribe S.A. (Propilco)     April 2008     100%     Petrochemicals     691 million
Offshore International Group Inc. (OIG)     February 2009     50% (2)     Exploration and Production     639 million
Oleoducto Central S.A. (Ocensa)     March 2009     24.7% (3)     Transportation     418 million
Hocol Petroleum Limited     March 2009     100% (4)     Exploration and Production     807 million
Refinería de Cartagena S.A. (Reficar)     May 2009     51% (5)     Refining     545 million
Equion Energia Limited     January 2011     51% (6)     Exploration and Production     814 million

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Includes amounts of adjustment on transaction prices.
(2) U.S. parent of Savía Perú (formerly Petrotech Peruana S.A.).
(3) As a result of this transaction, our ownership of Ocensa increased to 60%.
(4) We acquired 100% of Maurel et Prom’s interest in Hocol Petroleum Limited, whose most important assets are Hocol S.A. and Homcol Cayman Inc. As a result of the acquisition, our ownership in Oleoducto de Colombia, increased from 43.85% to 65.57%.
(5) As a result of this transaction, we became the sole owner of Reficar.
(6) As a result of this acquisition, our ownership increased to 72.65% in Ocensa, 73.00% in ODC, and to 85.12% in Oleoducto del Alto Magdalena or OAM. We also obtained a 10.2% interest in Transgas de Occidente.

 

In August 2010, we incorporated Oleoducto Bicentenario de Colombia S.A.S., or Oleoducto Bicentenario, a new company to build and operate a private pipeline that will run from the Casanare Department to the port of Coveñas. The new pipeline is linked to facilitate oil exports from the Llanos region. We have, indirectly, a 55.97% ownership of the company and five other shareholders own the remaining 44.03%.

 

The transactions described above were funded mainly through cash on hand and cash flow from our operations.

 

In January 2011, we increased our participation in Invercolsa S.A., a holding company with investments in natural gas transportation and distribution companies in Colombia, to 43.35% based on a final judgment of a court, which ordered the defendant, who had been the legal representative of Invercolsa, to return to us approximately 145 million shares of Invercolsa, which he had illegally bought in 1997 as part of the divestment of natural gas investments belonging to us.

 

In June 2012, we incorporated Cenit as our wholly-owned subsidiary. In October, 2012, we transferred all of our direct interests in Ocensa, ODC, Oleoducto Bicentenario, ODL and Serviport to Cenit and in April 2013, we transferred our crude oil and products transportation assets to it. This new subsidiary performs all of our hydrocarbon transport activities, pursuant to transport agreements between Cenit, us and other producers and distributors in Colombia. We continue operating Cenit’s transportation infrastructure in accordance with an operation and maintenance agreement. See “Item 4. Overview by Business Segment—Transportation and Logistics—Cenit.”

 

In 2012, we undertook a process of reorganization, consisting of the following actions:

 

· On May 11, 2012, Ecopetrol Pipelines International (EPI) merged with Ecopetrol Transportation Company Limited (ETI) and Ecopetrol Transportation Investments Limited, with EPI as the surviving entity.

 

· On July 12, 2012, Ecopetrol S.A. transferred to Ecopetrol Global Energy S.L.U. all of its shares in Ecopetrol America Inc.

 

· On August 14, 2012, Ecopetrol S.A. transferred to Ecopetrol Global Energy S.L.U. all of its shares in Ecopetrol del Perú S.A.

 

· On November 2, 2012, Equión Energía, in which we have a 51% interest, transferred 12.648% of its shares in Oleoducto Central S.A. (“Ocensa”) to Ecopetrol Equity Investments (Cayman), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ecopetrol S.A.

 

25
 

 

· On December 11, 2012, Ecopetrol S.A. transferred to Ecopetrol Global Energy S.L.U. all of its shares in Ecopetrol Oleo e Gas do Brasil.

 

· On December 21, 2012, Ecopetrol Pipelines International (EPI) merged with Ecopetrol Oil & Gas Investments and Ecopetrol Equity Investments.

 

· On December 27, 2012, Hocol S.A., or Hocol, merged with Hocol Limited and Homcol Cayman Inc., or Homcol.

 

Significant Subsidiaries

 

We are a mixed economy company and have a number of subsidiaries both in Colombia and abroad. Our subsidiaries are either directly owned by us or indirectly owned by us through one or more of our other subsidiaries. As of March 31, 2013, there were 25 subsidiaries directly owned by us, nine of which were incorporated in Colombia and 16 were incorporated abroad, and 14 subsidiaries were indirectly owned by us. Some of our subsidiaries have subsidiaries of their own.

 

We do not have any significant subsidiaries as such term is defined under SEC Regulation S-X. The following table sets forth some of our subsidiaries, their respective countries of incorporation, our percentage ownership in each (both directly and indirectly through other subsidiaries) and our voting percentage in each as of March 31, 2013:

 

COMPANY   COUNTRY OF
INCORPORATION
  OWNERSHIP AND
VOTING %
 
Exploration and Production            
Ecopetrol Oleo e Gas do Brasil Ltda**   Brazil     100.00  
Ecopetrol del Perú S.A.**   Peru     100.00  
Ecopetrol America Inc.**   United States     100.00  
Hocol Petroleum Limited   Bermuda     100.00  
Equion Energía Limited   United Kingdom     51.00  
Transportation            
Oleoducto de los Llanos Orientales S.A. (ODL)**   Panama     65.00  
Oleoducto de Colombia S.A.**   Colombia     73.00  
Oleoducto Central S.A.**   Colombia     72.65  
Oleoducto Bicentenario de Colombia S.A.S. (OBC) **   Colombia     55.97  
Cenit Transporte y Logística de Hidrocarburos S.A.S   Colombia    

100.00

 
             
Refining and Petrochemicals            
Refinería de Cartagena S.A.*   Colombia     100.00  
Propilco S.A.*   Colombia     100.00  
Compounding and Masterbatching Industry Ltda. (COMAI)**   Colombia     100.00  
Biofuels            
Bioenergy S.A.**   Colombia     91.43  
Other            
Black Gold Re Ltd.   Bermuda     100.00  

 

 

* Direct and indirect participation.

** Solely indirect participation through other subsidiaries or affiliates.

 

See Exhibit 8.1 to this annual report for a complete list of our subsidiaries, their respective countries of incorporation, our percentage of ownership in each (both directly and indirectly through our other subsidiaries) and our voting ownership in each.

 

Strategic Plan

 

In 2010, we extended the scope of our strategic plan to 2020, which we updated in 2012, and which we refer to as our Strategic Plan. Our Strategic Plan considers Ecopetrol to be an integrated corporate group, composed of Ecopetrol S.A. and its subsidiaries and affiliates located in Colombia and abroad, focused on the exploration and development of crude oil, natural gas, petrochemicals and alternative fuels. We intend to develop as a key player and become one of the 30 main companies in the global oil industry, recognized for our international positioning, innovation and commitment to sustainable development.

 

26
 

 

We are committed to our goal of producing 1 million gross Clean Barrels of oil equivalent per day by 2015 and 1.3 million gross Clean Barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2020, aligned with our principal stakeholders in a sustainable way in three categories: economic, social and environmental, with an average return on capital employed, or ROCE, of 17%. We use the term “Clean Barrels” to refer to the production of crude oil barrels without accidents or environmental incidents and in harmony with our stakeholders. We continue approaching operational excellence as a commitment to work systematically in a healthy, clean and safe manner, maximizing the use of resources, striving to exceed our clients’ and interest groups’ expectations.

 

Our Strategic Plan contemplates investments of US$84.7 billion for the period 2012-2020 and US$75 billion between 2013 and 2020, to be allocated as follows:

 

Upstream : Investments in exploration and production are expected to be US$71 billion which corresponds to 84% of the total investment plan. Our operations in Colombia are expected to receive approximately 90% of our total investment in this segment. The additional 10% is expected to be destined to projects in the Gulf of Mexico and Brazil. Out of the US$71 billion, US$13 billion is expected to be invested in the exploration and development of new reserves. Furthermore, our implementation of the latest technology to accomplish a better recovery factor requires an investment of US$35 billion, which is expected to result in 3,400 million boe by 2020. Our development plan is mainly concentrated on certain current fields including: Castilla, Chichimene, Apiay, Casabe, La Cira-Infantas, Rubiales, Quifa, Putumayo, Arauca and Catatumbo. Incorporation of proved reserves (1P) of crude oil equivalent between 2011 - 2020 is estimated at 6,200 million gross barrels. The expected ROCE is 26%

 

Midstream and Downstream : We plan to make an investment in refining of US$9 billion for 2013–2020, which represents 11% of our Strategic Plan, to complete the modernization of the Cartagena and Barrancabermeja refineries. The ROCE is estimated at 8% for the period 2020 – 2025. We expect to invest US$4.5 billion in transportation and logistics in order to complete our network’s expansion, mainly through our participation in the Bicentenario Pipeline, the expansion of the Ocensa Pipeline, increasing the evacuation capacity from the Magdalena Medio crudes and the enlargement of the Pozos Colorados – Galán system. The ROCE is estimated at 11% by 2020.

 

The investments that our Strategic Plan envisions are subject to market analysis, conceptual engineering and financial feasibility. We currently expect to fund the investments contemplated by our Strategic Plan as follows: 75% from our cash generation from operations, 11% from a primary equity issuance and 14% from debt. We believe that we should be able to access local and international debt markets if the need arises, although we can make no assurances that these external sources of financing will be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Liquidity and Capital Resources.” We are also authorized by Law 1118 of 2006 to issue up to 20% of additional equity, of which we have so far issued 11.51%, leaving us with the ability to issue an additional 8.49%, which could be used as an additional source of funding for our Strategic Plan. In our Strategic Plan, we have adopted a conservative criteria that does not take into account the high prices on the market and long-term estimates about the West Texas Intermediate, or WTI, and Brent prices, whereby we used a fixed price of US$80 per barrel for WTI reference and $90 for Brent reference. We further assume and expect that the dividend payout ratio will be close to 70% which, compared to other global oil and gas companies, surpasses the average of between 35-50%. Our Strategic Plan assumes a profitability close to 17% of ROCE by 2020.

 

We expect to meet the goals of our Strategic Plan together with our joint venture partners with whom we have built long-term relationships. We are also working on making progress on our Strategic Plan with foreign governmental authorities in countries where we already have operations or where we intend to develop operations.

 

In addition, we maintain strategic initiatives with respect to each of our different segments, as outlined below.

 

Exploration and Production

 

Become an international player with the capacity to incorporate reserves and increase production of crude oil and natural gas in a sustainable way

 

We aim to develop a competitive advantage in heavy crudes, increasing our capacity to add reserves and produce oil and gas in a sustainable way. Our 2012 review of our Strategic Plan confirmed our assessment that we believe we have the potential to produce 1.3 gross million boepd by 2020 from our operations in Colombia and abroad. Furthermore, in the near term we plan to continue to focus on infill drilling and water injection projects and continue to develop the enhanced oil recovery technology. In 2012, capital expenditures amounted to Ps$8.2 trillion (approximately US$ 4.5 billion) in our Exploration and Production segment.

 

27
 

 

 

National Exploration : We expect to invest in 3D seismic and stratigraphic wells, as well as to explore prospects in other materials, especially in the heavy crude belt located in the Llanos, Caguan-Putumayo and Piedemonte Llanero regions. We believe there is a likelihood of finding oil and gas in the Caribbean offshore, especially in the north area. However, we expect offshore exploration in the Caribbean to contribute to production starting around 2020.

 

International Exploration : We continue to believe that the Gulf of Mexico and Brazil exhibit a high potential for exploration and production growth. In the Gulf of Mexico, we intend to focus on the following plays: Miocene subsalt, Paleogene and Jurassic. Ecopetrol is also seeking to balance the risk of its investment portfolio with short-term development projects. In Brazil, our focus is on the Santos and Ecuatorian borders as well as the Presal Plays.

 

Conventional Hydrocarbons : With higher certainty and a better understanding of the risks associated with this segment, production of conventional hydrocarbons could reach 1.1 gross million boepd by 2020. We have assessed potential improvements in our recovery factor, mainly through the use of infill drilling and water-injection methodologies which, we believe, have fewer associated risks and better economic results.

 

Unconventional Hydrocarbons : In our 2012 Strategic Plan, we gave more emphasis to the potential presented by unconventional reservoirs, as defined by the Colombian law, including shale oil, shale gas and tight reservoirs, among others.

 

Refining and Petrochemicals

 

Produce cleaner and more valuable products, ensuring profitability through synergies and taking advantage of market opportunities by adding greater value to the refining streams while increasing production of petrochemicals.

 

For 2012, capital expenditures in our Refining and Petrochemical segment were Ps$ 4.4 trillion (approximately US$2.4 billion).

 

Refining : We seek to be the competitive choice in Colombia for products supply, intending to meet a ROCE of 8% for the period 2020 – 2025. We aim to complete modernization projects at our refineries that encourage value creation and operational excellence with a particular focus on: (1) ensuring the completion of the projects at Barrancabermeja and Cartagena refineries, (2) developing our reputation as producer of clean fuels, and capitalizing and developing market opportunities within the local, regional and international markets, (3) becoming the preferred alternative for raw material supply within the petrochemical business, (4) growing sustainably and profitably by turning heavy crude oils into our competitive advantage, maximizing their worth in the chain and optimizing their performance to achieve the expected value of projects, (5) refining margin maximization by optimizing the integrated performance within the supply chain, and (6) finding opportunities to use raw materials, supplies and technologies that add value and align with the regulatory framework and business competitive development.

 

Petrochemical : Our strategy will focus on consolidating our current position in the market, and improving the competitiveness and reliability of our existing infrastructure, identifying feasible options for a cost-efficient operation, maximizing the margin of our petrochemicals through integrated performance optimization in our supply chain and seeking alternatives that allow us to guarantee the availability and logistics for competitive raw materials within the petrochemical industry.

 

Transportation and Logistics

 

Foster profitable growth and development across the entire value chain

 

Our strategy for transportation and logistics seeks to turn this sector into a facilitator for the development of the entire value chain, providing solutions, ensuring the efficiency of crude oil flows and their derivatives for use by our company and for third parties. During 2012, capital expenditures in our Transportation and Logistics segment amounted to Ps$ 2.7 trillion (approximately US$ 1.5 billion).

 

We aim to accomplish: (1) an increase in the total capacity of crude oil transportation by more than 100%, from 850 thousand to 1.7 million barrels per day, (2) an increase in the total capacity of refining products transportation by 65%, from 415 thousand to 680 thousand barrels per day, (3) diversification of our risks and investments through strategic alliances with system users and third parties, (4) development of our customer service for internal and external clients, (5) profitable growth with 11% ROCE by 2020 and (6) leveraging of our competitive advantage in heavy crude oil.

 

28
 

 

Create a new transportation subsidiary

 

In June 2012, we incorporated Cenit as a wholly-owned subsidiary specializing in logistics and transportation of hydrocarbons within Colombia. With the incorporation of Cenit, we aim to enhance the strategic and logistical framework of Colombia’s oil industry in response to the increase in hydrocarbon production and higher sales of crudes and refined products, both within Colombia and on the international markets. Cenit is expected to operate with an open model in which all interested parties will have the opportunity to access its transportation infrastructure. See “Item 4. Overview by Business Segment—Transportation and Logistics—Cenit.”

 

Marketing and Supply

 

Focus on the importance of the market and clients and define our key products and markets

 

Our Strategic Plan sets out guidelines for sales and marketing that cut across our operational areas and emphasizes the importance of defining our markets, our clients and the need to define key products. Our strategy is focused on supplying the local market and exporting crude oil, refined products, petrochemical products and natural gas to end-users, including refineries and wholesalers, in order to improve our margins. We also intend to increase our market participation in crude oil and refined products in Asia and Europe.

 

Develop and consolidate the Corporate Group’s basket of products through alternative energy

 

We intend to participate in the Colombian renewable energy market in partnership with local investors, with whom we have undertaken the development of refineries to process sugar cane and palm oil for biofuels. We plan to produce 450 thousand tons of biofuels by 2020 (including biodiesel from Ecodiesel Colombia S.A., or Ecodiesel, in which we have a 50% share, and ethanol from Bioenergy S.A.).

 

OVERVIEW BY BUSINESS SEGMENT

 

Exploration and Production

 

Summary

 

Our exploration and production business segment includes exploration, development and production activities in Colombia and abroad. We began local exploration in 1955 and international exploration in 2006. We conduct exploration and production activities directly and through joint ventures with third parties. As of December 31, 2012, we were the largest producer of crude oil and natural gas, the largest operator and we maintained the largest acreage under exploration in Colombia.

 

29
 

 

We have exploratory activities in all of the sedimentary basins that currently have activity in Colombia. The following map shows the basins where we conduct exploratory activities.

 

 

We have divided Ecopetrol S.A.’s production activities in Colombia into six administrative regions. The administrative regions, and their respective 2012 production results, prior to deducting royalties, are as follows:

 

Northeastern Region – The Northeastern region is comprised of two areas: one located in the north of Colombia along the Atlantic coast and the other located in the Piedemonte Llanero. The Northeastern region covers approximately 541,404 acres and includes the natural gas fields located at La Guajira and the crude oil and natural gas fields located in Cusiana-Cupiagua. In 2012, the Northeastern region had a total production of approximately 47.8 thousand bpd of crude oil, 548.1 million cubic feet per day or mcfpd of natural gas and 3.2 bpd of liquids from the natural gas process.

 

Mid-Magdalena Valley Region – The Mid-Magdalena Valley region runs along the Magdalena river valley and covers approximately 997,839 acres. It includes the crude oil fields located in the Santander department and part of the Antioquia, Cesar and Boyacá departments near the Barrancabermeja refinery. In 2012, the Mid-Magdalena Valley region had a total production of approximately 100.3 thousand bpd of heavy and light crude oil, 33.7 mcfpd of natural gas and 1.6 bpd of liquids from the natural gas process.

 

Central Region – For the year 2012 this region was divided in two: the Central Region and the Eastern Region. The Central region includes the western part of the Meta department. It covers approximately 74,264 acres and in 2012 had a total production of approximately 177.9 thousand bpd of heavy and medium crude oil, 0.5 mcfpd of natural gas and 1.5 bpd of liquids from the natural gas process.

 

Eastern Region – The Eastern region is located in Colombia’s central area and includes the northeastern and eastern part of the Meta department. While this administrative region was formally created in October 2011, it completed its first full year in operation at the end of 2012. Operations in this region are made up mainly of joint venture fields that originally belonged to the Central Region. It covers approximately 645,093 acres and in 2012 had a total production of approximately 130.4 thousand bpd of heavy and medium crude oil.

 

30
 

 

Catatumbo-Orinoquía Region – The Catatumbo-Orinoquía region is located in the eastern part of Colombia and runs along the border with Venezuela, covering approximately 1,197,310 acres. It includes the Caño Limón crude oil field, with a total production in 2012 of approximately 69.6 thousand bpd of crude oil, 2.6 mcfpd of natural gas and 0.04 bpd of liquids from the natural gas process.

 

Southern Region – The Southern region is located on the southwestern region of Colombia and covers approximately 917,781 acres. It includes the Orito, Guando and Tello and San Francisco fields located mainly in the Cundinamarca, Huila and Putumayo departments. In 2012, the Southern region had a total production of approximately 56.9 thousand bpd of crude oil, 5.9 mcfpd of natural gas and 0.5 bpd of liquids from the natural gas process.

 

In addition to the administrative regions mentioned above, we have established a minor fields area that covers some of our smaller fields throughout Colombia. The main purpose of this minor fields area is to establish strategies to improve efficiency in the production of reserves from these fields. The total production of the minor fields area during 2012 was 5.9 thousand bpd of crude oil and 3.3 mcfpd of natural gas. This production corresponds to fields located in the Mid-Magdalena Valley, Central, Catatumbo-Orinoquía and the Southern regions.

 

The map below indicates the location of our operations in Colombia.

 

 

31
 

 

Exploration

 

Our exploration plan in Colombia is focused on exploration of existing production sites in close proximity, exploration of currently producing basins and exploration of frontier areas, including off-shore areas primarily operated by our business partners, which we believe have the potential for large findings. Our exploration strategy outside of Colombia is focused on locating prospects and establishing joint ventures with experienced operators.

 

During 2012, we drilled 23 gross wildcats exploratory wells (A3-A2), 15 in Colombia and eight overseas.  A2 exploratory wells are drilled adjacent to and at deeper or at shallower depths than proven oil deposits in a productive oil field. We drill A3 exploratory wells to find oil deposits in fields where no wells have yet proven productive. We discovered hydrocarbon presence in 11 productive wells, of which nine are located in Colombia and two in the U.S. Gulf Coast. Ten wells were dry, of which five were located in Colombia and five overseas. As of December 31, 2012, two wells were under evaluation, of which one is located in Colombia and the remaining one in Brazil.

 

Exploration Activities in Colombia

 

We conduct exploration in Colombia on our own and through joint ventures with regional and global oil and gas companies. We also benefit from sole risk contracts when commercial reserves are found. In the case of sole risk contracts, we do not take any exploration risk. See “Contractual Arrangements for the Exploration and Production of Crude Oil and Natural Gas in Colombia.”

 

In 2012, we acquired 2,590 equivalent kilometers of seismic data in Colombia, including 935 equivalent kilometers acquired by Hocol. Ecopetrol S.A. acquired 1,655 equivalent kilometers, corresponding to 229.7 kilometers of 2D seismic and 1,425.7 equivalent kilometers of 3D seismic data.  Ecopetrol directly acquired 748 of those kilometers of seismic and 907 kilometers were acquired by our business partners.

 

Ecopetrol S.A. drilled a total of seven wildcats exploratory wells (A3-A2) in 2012. Evidence of hydrocarbons was discovered in five of the wells (Tisquirama Este-1, Caronte, Aullador-1, Embrujo-1 ST-2 and Mapalé). One well was dry and the remaining were under evaluation. Hocol drilled eight A3 wells. Evidence of hydrocarbons was found in four of the Hocol wells (Pintado, Dorcas, Mamey and Merlín 6), while the other four were dry.

 

During 2012, Ecopetrol S.A. signed 12 exploration and production contracts with the ANH and business partners corresponding to blocks awarded to Ecopetrol S.A. in the Colombia Open Round 2012. These blocks cover a total area of more than four million hectares and are located in the Llanos (provinces of Arauca, Casanare and Meta), Mid-Magdalena Valley (Cundinamarca and Caldas provinces) and Sinu-San Jacinto (Antioquia and Cordoba provinces) basins, and the Guajira offshore field. Ecopetrol S.A. has a 100% stake in six of the contracts.

 

Exploration Activities Outside of Colombia

 

Our international exploration strategy is focused on participating in bidding rounds to secure blocks available for exploration and entering into joint ventures with international and regional oil companies. We believe exploring outside Colombia allows us to diversify our risks and improve the possibilities of increasing our crude oil and natural gas reserves.

 

In 2012, we drilled eight international gross exploratory wells through our subsidiaries and partners as follows:

 

· Brazil : During the second half of 2012, a concession in which Ecopetrol Brasil is a partner, drilled three wells. Ecopetrol Brasil thus acquired a 30% interest in the blocks BM-S-72 (the Sabiá prospect), BM-S-63 (the Canário prospect) and BM-S-71 (the Jandaia prospect), operated by Vanco (with a 40% working interest), Brasoil and Panoro (each with 15% working interest). As of December 31, 2012, Sabiá and Canário were declared dry and Jandaia was under evaluation.

 

· Gulf of Mexico : Ecopetrol America drilled three wells in the Gulf of Mexico, two of which encountered hydrocarbons and one was declared dry. The Parmer well was drilled with our partners Apache Deepwater LLC, as operator, and Stone Energy Offshore LLC. Ecopetrol America has a 30% working interest in this well. The second discovery was the Dalmatian well, in which Ecopetrol America has a 30% working interest, drilled with our partner Murphy Exploration and Production Company, as operator. Ecopetrol America had a 30% working interest in the Candy Bars well, with our partner Statoil as operator, which was declared dry.

 

32
 

 

· Peru : Savía Perú S.A., or Savía Perú, in which we have a 50% ownership interest, drilled two wells off the Peruvian coast. As of December 31, 2012, these wells showed presence of hydrocarbons but were commercially unsuccessful.

 

As of December 31, 2012, we acquired 23,908 kilometers of additional seismic equivalent: 13,908 kilometers in the U.S. Gulf Coast and 10,000 kilometers in Brazil, an increase of 18.7% compared with seismic data as of December 31, 2011.

 

Exploratory Wells

 

The following table sets forth the number of gross and net productive and dry exploratory wells drilled by us and our joint venture partners, and the exploratory wells drilled by third parties under sole risk contracts for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    For the year ended December 31,  
    2012     2011     2010  
COLOMBIA                        
Ecopetrol                        
Gross Exploratory Wells                        
Owned and operated by Ecopetrol                        
Productive (1)     4       7       2  
Dry (2)     1       10       4  
Total     5 (3)     17       6  
Operated by Partner in Joint Venture                        
Productive (1)     - (4)     -       1  
Dry (2)     -       -       2  
Total     -       -       3  
Operated by Ecopetrol in Joint Venture                        
Productive (1)     -       2       3  
Dry (2)     -       2       1  
Total     -       4       4  
Net Exploratory Wells (5)                        
Productive (1)     3.3       7.8       3.2  
Dry (2)     2       10.9       5.6  
Total     5.3       18.7       8.8  
Sole Risk (7)                        
Productive (1)     -       2       7  
Dry (2)     1       6       11  
Total     1 (6)     8       18  
Hocol                        
Gross Exploratory Wells                        
Productive (1)     4       2       -  
Dry (2)     4       2       9  
Total     8       4       9  
Net Exploratory Wells (5)                        
Productive (1)     3       2       -  
Dry (2)     4       1.5       5  
Total     7       3.5       5  
Equion                        
Gross Exploratory Wells                        
Productive (1)     -       -       N/A  
Dry (2)     1       -       N/A  
Total     1       -       N/A  
Net Exploratory Wells (5)                        
Productive (1)     -       -       N/A  
Dry (2)     -       -       N/A  
Total     -       -       N/A  

 

33
 

 

INTERNATIONAL                        
Ecopetrol America Inc.                        
Gross Exploratory Wells                        
Productive (1)`     2       1       -  
Dry (2)     1       1       3  
Total     3       2       3  
Net Exploratory Wells (5)                        
Productive (1)     -       0.2       -  
Dry (2)     -       0.3       0.9  
Total     -       0.5       0.9  
Ecopetrol Oleo e Gas do Brasil                        
Gross Exploratory Wells                        
Productive (1)     -       -       1  
Dry (2)     2       2       1  
Total     2 (8)     2       2  
Net Exploratory Wells (5)                        
Productive (1)     -       -       0.5  
Dry (2)     1       0.2       0.3  
Total     1       0.2       0.8  
Ecopetrol del Perú                        
Gross Exploratory Wells                        
Productive (1)     -       -       -  
Dry (2)     -       -       1  
Total     -       -       1  
Net Exploratory Wells (5)                        
Productive (1)     -       -       -  
Dry (2)     -       -       0.3  
Total     -       -       0.3  
Savía Perú                        
Gross Exploratory Wells                        
Productive (1)     -       5       1  
Dry (2)     2       1       -  
Total     2       6       1  
Net Exploratory Wells (5)                        
Productive (1)     -       3       0.5  
Dry (2)     2       0.5       -  
Total     2       3.5       0.5  

 

 

(1) A productive well is an exploratory well that is not a dry well.
(2) A dry well or hole is an exploratory well found to be incapable of producing either crude oil or natural gas in sufficient quantities to justify completion as a crude oil or natural gas well.
(3) This number does not include one well under evaluation at December 31, 2012.
(4) This number does not include the Mapale well which is included in Equion’s operation.
(5) Net exploratory wells are calculated according to our percentage of ownership in these wells.
(6) This number does not include two wells under evaluation at December 31, 2012.
(7) We do not take any risk in sole risk contracts but we benefit from successful exploratory efforts.
(8) This number does not include one well under evaluation at December 31, 2012.

 

Production

 

As part of our Strategic Plan, we take into account the increase of the recovery factor in the fields currently held by Ecopetrol S.A., including those that were discovered more than 20 years ago. Our target is to invest in these fields in order to increase our average daily production of hydrocarbons and reserves. Around 88% of the fields of Ecopetrol S.A. are in primary recovery. Secondary recovery (waterflooding) is or has been implemented in 8% of the fields. Finally, tertiary or enhanced oil recovery has been applied in 4% of the fields. We continue to focus our efforts on improving the productivity ratio of several directly operated fields and other fields currently held through joint ventures with other oil companies. All figures for crude oil and natural gas production are shown prior to deducting royalties, except when specifically stated otherwise.

 

Our total average consolidated daily production of hydrocarbons in 2012, prior to deducting royalties, totaled 754 thousand boepd, of which 635 thousand bpd corresponded to crude oil and 119 thousand boepd corresponded to natural gas. This production includes the production contribution from our subsidiaries and affiliates, Hocol, Equion, Ecopetrol America Inc. and Savía Perú on the basis of our participation. Ecopetrol S.A.’s production amounted to 93.1% of total consolidated production, Hocol 3.3%, Equion 2.4%, Savía Perú 0.9% and Ecopetrol America 0.3%.

 

34
 

 

During 2012, we produced 745 thousand boepd in Colombia through Ecopetrol S.A., Hocol and Equion, out of which 627 thousand boepd corresponded to crude oil and 118 thousand boepd corresponded to natural gas.

 

During 2011, our consolidated average daily production of hydrocarbons totaled 724 thousand boepd, out of which 616 thousand bpd corresponded to crude oil and 108 thousand boepd corresponded to natural gas. In 2010, our consolidated average daily production of hydrocarbons totaled 616 thousand boepd, out of which 516 thousand bpd corresponded to crude oil and 100 thousand boepd corresponded to natural gas.

 

Ecopetrol S.A.’s crude oil production during 2012 consisted of approximately 48% light and medium crudes (above 15º American Petroleum Institute, or API, gravity ) and 52% of heavy crudes, with a gravity equal or lower than API gravity 15°. In 2011, approximately 51% of the crude oil production corresponded to light and medium crudes while the remaining 49% to heavy crudes. During 2010, production distribution was approximately 56% of light and medium crudes and 44% of heavy crudes.

 

As of December 31, 2012, we were the largest participant in the Colombian hydrocarbons industry, with approximately 66% of crude oil production and approximately 58% of natural gas production. Our production volume in 2012 in Colombia includes Ecopetrol S.A. and Hocol’s production along with our share in Equion’s production.

 

We undertake development drilling in producing regions, drilling 210 gross development wells operated by us in Colombia in 2012, 27% less than in 2011 and 4% less than in 2010. Of the total gross development wells drilled by Ecopetrol S.A. and through joint ventures in 2012, 16 wells were dry in the Eastern Region, two in the minor fields, one in the Catatumbo Orinoquía Region, one in the Mid-Magdalena Valley Region and one was dry in the Southern Region. In 2011, Ecopetrol S.A. had seven dry development wells and in 2010 it had three.

 

35
 

 

Relevant Operational Activities

 

The following table sets forth the number of gross and net productive and dry development wells drilled exclusively by us and in joint ventures for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    For the year ended December 31,  
    2012     2011     2010  
COLOMBIA                        
Ecopetrol S.A.                        
Northeastern Region:                        
Gross wells owned and operated by Ecopetrol     -       2       -  
Gross wells in Joint Ventures     6       4       4  
Net Wells (1)     3       4       3  
Mid-Magdalena Valley Region:                        
Gross wells owned and operated by Ecopetrol     46       74       50  
Gross wells in Joint Ventures     212       314       268  
Net Wells (1)     135       233       181  
Central Region:                        
Gross wells owned and operated by Ecopetrol     134       170       121  
Gross wells in Joint Ventures     -       175       189  
Net Wells (1)     134       245       207  
Eastern Region (2) :                        
Gross wells owned and operated by Ecopetrol     -       N/A       N/A  
Gross wells in Joint Ventures     265       N/A       N/A  
Net Wells (1)     115       N/A       N/A  
Catatumbo-Orinoquía Region:                        
Gross wells owned and operated by Ecopetrol     1       14       -  
Gross wells in Joint Ventures     36       44       23  
Net Wells (1)     17       34       9  
Southern Region:                        
Gross wells owned and operated by Ecopetrol     1       4       12  
Gross wells in Joint Ventures     20       21       39  
Net Wells (1)     8       11       16  
Minor Fields:                        
Gross wells owned and operated by Ecopetrol     -       -       -  
Gross wells in Joint Ventures     2       1       -  
Net Wells (1)     -       1       -  
Hocol                        
Gross wells owned and operated by Hocol     25       20       36  
Gross wells in Joint Ventures     5       10       7  
Net Wells (1)     24       23       34  
Equion                        
Gross wells owned and operated by Equion     3       2       N/A  
Gross wells in Joint Ventures     -       -       N/A  
Net Wells (1)     2       1      

N/A

 
Total Gross wells owned and operated in Colombia     210       286       219  
Total Gross wells in Joint Ventures in Colombia     546       569       530  
Total Net Wells (Colombia)     438       552       450  
INTERNATIONAL                        
Savía Perú                        
Gross wells     18       20       14  
Net Wells (1)     9       10       7  
Ecopetrol America Inc.                        
Gross wells     -       -       -  
Net Wells (1)     -       -       -  
Total Gross Wells (International)     18       20       14  
Total Net Wells (International)     9       10       7  

 

 

(1) Net wells correspond to the sum of wells entirely owned by us and our ownership percentage of wells owned in joint ventures with our partners.
(2) The Eastern region is included for 2012, the first full year in which it operated its fields after its creation in October 2011.

 

Production Activities in Colombia

 

Our average daily production of crude oil in Colombia reached 627 thousand bpd in 2012, a 2.9% increase compared to 2011. The increase in our average daily production is due to a 7.7% increase in production from fields operated by us, which totaled 349 thousand bpd in 2012 compared to 324 thousand bpd in 2011.

 

36
 

 

During 2011, we had an average daily production of crude oil of 609 thousand bpd of crude oil, which represents a 19.9% growth compared to 2010. This increase was due to (1) a 19.7% increase in production from fields developed with our business partners, which totaled 285 thousand bpd in 2011 from 238 thousand bpd in 2010, and (2) a 20.0% increase in production from fields operated by us, for a total of 324 thousand bpd in 2011 compared to 270 thousand bpd in 2010.

 

The following table sets forth our average daily crude oil production, prior to deducting royalties, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    For the Year ended December 31  
    2012     2011     2010  
    (thousand bpd)  
COLOMBIA                        
Ecopetrol                        
Northeastern region:                        
Joint venture operation     27       24       29  
Direct operation     21       23       12  
Total Northeastern region     48       47       41  
Mid-Magdalena Valley region:                        
Joint venture operation     22       21       19  
Direct operation     79       74       65  
Total Mid-Magdalena Valley region     100       95       84  
Central region:                        
Joint venture operation     -       120       78  
Direct operation     178       165       140  
Total Central region     178       285       219  
Eastern region (1) :                        
Joint venture operation     130       N/A       N/A  
Direct operation     -       N/A       N/A  
Total Eastern region     130       N/A       N/A  
Catatumbo-Orinoquía region:                        
Joint venture operation     66       77       60  
Direct operation     4       4       3  
Total Catatumbo-Orinoquia region     70       81       63  
Southern region:                        
Joint venture operation     25       33       36  
Direct operation     32       24       27  
Total Southern region     57       57       62  
Minor Fields:                        
Joint venture operation     4       6       12  
Direct operation     2       -       1  
Total Minor Fields     6       6       13  
Hocol                        
Joint venture operation     3       4       4  
Direct operation     22       26       22  
Total Hocol     25       30       26  
Equion                        
Joint venture operation     -       -       N/A  
Direct operation     11       8      

N/A

 
Total Equion     11       8      

N/A

 
Production Tests     2.1       0.4       0.2  
Total Average Daily Crude Oil Production (Colombia)     627       609       508  
INTERNATIONAL                        
Savía Perú     6       6       6  
Ecopetrol America Inc.     2       2       2  
Total Average Daily Crude Oil Production (International)     8       8       8  
TOTAL AVERAGE DAILY CRUDE OIL PRODUCTION     635       616       516  

 

 

(1) The Eastern region is included for 2012, the first full year in which it operated its fields after its creation in 2011.

 

The following table sets forth our developed and undeveloped gross and net acreage of crude oil and natural gas production by region for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

37
 

 

    Production Acreage at December 31, 2012    

Average crude
oil and natural
gas production
for the year
ended
December 31,
2012 (1)

 
    Developed     Undeveloped     (thousands
 
    Gross     Net     Gross     Net     boepd)  
    (in acres)        
COLOMBIA                                        
Ecopetrol                                        
Northeastern region     81,552       51,007       459,852       361,321       147  
Mid-Magdalena Valley region     52,813       39,360       945,026       847,112       108  
Central region     16,640       16,640       57,624       57,624       179  
Eastern region     72,155       48,906       572,938       277,703       130  
Catatumbo-Orinoquía region     51,668       41,818       1,145,642       693,659       70  
Southern region     45,122       33,786       872,659       628,997       58  
Minor Fields     8,538       7,440       444,455       284,131       7  
Hocol     4,238       3,707       735       583       25  
Equion     19,436       7,430       890,717       353,354       18  
Total (Colombia)     352,162       250,094       5,389,648       3,504,484       742  
INTERNATIONAL                                        
Savía Perú     80,205       80,205       5,575       5,575       6  
Ecopetrol America Inc. (2)     20,880       1,925       28,800       7,443       2  
Total (International)     101,085       82,130       34,375       13,018       9  
Total     453,247       332,224       5,424,023       3,517,502       751  

 

 

(1) Does not include 2.1 thousand bpd of production from exploratory activities.
(2) Production and acreage from Ecopetrol America Inc. is related to the K2 field lease contracts in the Gulf of Mexico. There are five lease contracts, four of which are in the production stage and do not have expiration dates, while one is an exploratory lease that expires on June 30, 2016. For the Dalmatian production acreage four leases are included as undeveloped acreage until production starts. These leases do not have expiration date.

 

The following table sets forth our total gross and net productive wells by region for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

    At December 31, 2012  
    Crude Oil     Natural Gas  
    Gross     Net     Gross     Net  
COLOMBIA                                
Ecopetrol                                
Northeastern region     76       59       26       15  
Mid-Magdalena Valley region     3,165       2,145       10       10  
Central region     520       520       -       -  
Eastern region     705       296       -       -  
Catatumbo-Orinoquía region     649       389       -       -  
Southern region     845       556       3       2  
Minor fields     187       121       4       2  
Hocol     197       115       2       1  
Equion     38       11       -       -  
Total (Colombia)     6,382       4,212       45       30  
INTERNATIONAL                                
Savía Perú     641       321       -       -  
Ecopetrol America Inc.     7       1       -       -  
Total (International)     648       321       -       -  
Total     7,030       4,533       45       30  

 

38
 

 

We consider as crude oil wells those which main operation is directed towards oil production, although many of these wells produce gas associated with oil production that, in some cases, have a commercial purpose. Natural gas wells are those which operations are directed only towards production of commercial gas. The above table reflects the productive wells that directly contribute to hydrocarbons production, and therefore excludes wells used for injection, disposal, captation, or other similar activities.

 

Crude Oil

 

Volume of Crude Oil Purchased

 

The table below sets forth the volumes of crude oil purchased from our business partners and third parties and volumes of crude oil purchased from the ANH corresponding to royalties that have been received by the ANH in-kind from producers for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    For the year ended December 31,  
    2012     2011     2010  
    (million barrels)  
Ecopetrol                        
Crude oil purchased from the ANH     48.0       46.7       40.5  
Crude oil purchased from our business partners and third parties     25.4       22.8       23.1  
Hocol                        
Crude oil purchased from our business partners and third parties     10.8       10.3       9.1  
Equion                        
Crude oil purchased from our business partners and third parties     3.5       4.4      

N/A

 
Total (1)     87.7       84.2       72.7  

 

(1) Purchases of crude oil from the ANH and our business partners are allocated to our Marketing and Supply segment.

 

Light Crude Oil

 

Light crude oil has API gravity 35 ° or higher and tends to have a higher sales price in the international market. We develop and produce light crude oil in the Cusiana, Cupiagua, Pauto, Floreña and Rancho Hermoso fields. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, Ecopetrol S.A.’s production of light crude oil (on a stand-alone basis) was 60 thousand, 61 thousand and 48 thousand bpd, respectively.

 

Heavy Crude Oil

 

We consider heavy crudes as those with API gravity below 15 ° . Ecopetrol S.A. (on a stand-alone basis) develops, upgrades and produces heavy crude in the Central, Eastern and Mid-Magdalena Valley regions. Ecopetrol S.A.’s production of heavy crude oil increased from 24 thousand bpd in 2000 to 304 thousand bpd in 2012 and production from 2011 to 2012 increased 9.1% as a result of the development of the Rubiales, Castilla and Chichimene fields. In 2011, Ecopetrol S.A.’s production of heavy crudes amounted to 278 thousand bpd, compared to 210 thousand bpd produced in 2010, mainly as a result of the development of the same fields. We are committed to developing our heavy crude reserves as they are a key element of our growth strategy.

 

Our most important heavy crude oil projects are:

 

· Cubarral . The Cubarral block is located in the Central region and is comprised of the Castilla and Chichimene fields. Together, these fields in 2012 produced approximately 156 thousand bpd, a 9.9% increase compared with 2011 production.

 

· Rubiales - Quifa . The Rubiales and Quifa fields are located in the Eastern region and are developed in joint venture with Metapetroleum. The Rubiales and Quifa fields increased our production from 113.2 thousand bpd in 2011 to 124.9 thousand bpd in 2012. In 2011, we, along with Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp., started the Synchronized Thermal Additional Recovery, or STAR, technology pilot project in the Quifa field to begin testing the use of in situ combustion-based technology which is expected to increase the recovery factor in Colombia’s heavy oil fields.

 

Natural Gas

 

In 2012, our average daily production of natural gas in Colombia reached 118 thousand boepd, a 9.3% increase when compared to 2011 production. When compared to 2010, natural gas production increased by 9.1% in 2011.

 

39
 

 

The following table sets forth our average daily natural gas production, prior to deducting royalties, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. The volume of liquids from the natural gas process is included since 2012.

 

    For the year ended December 31,  
    2012     2011     2010  
    (Thousand boepd ) (1)  
COLOMBIA                        
Ecopetrol                        
Northeastern region:                        
Joint Venture     94       94       92  
Direct Operation     5       -       -  
Total Northeastern region     99       95       92  
Mid-Magdalena Valley region:                        
Joint Venture     1       1       1  
Direct Operation     6       3       3  
Total Mid-Magdalena Valley region     8       4       4  
Central region:                        
Joint Venture     -       -       -  
Direct Operation     2       -       -  
Total Central region     2       -       -  
Eastern region (2) :                        
Joint Venture     -       -       -  
Direct Operation     -       -       -  
Total Eastern region     -       -       -  
Catatumbo-Orinoquía region:                        
Joint Venture     -       -       -  
Direct Operation     -       -       -  
Total Catatumbo-Orinoquía region     -       -       -  
Southern region:                        
Joint Venture     -       -       1  
Direct Operation     1       1       -  
Total Southern region     1       1       1  
Minor Fields:                        
Joint venture operation     -       1       1  
Direct operation     -       -       -  
Total Minor Fields     1       1       1  
Hocol                        
Joint venture operation     -       -       -  
Direct operation     -       -       1  
Total Hocol     -       -       1  
Equion (3)                        
Joint venture operation     -       -       N/A  
Direct operation     7       6      

N/A

 
Total Equion     7       6      

N/A

 
Production Tests     -       -       -  
Total Natural Gas Production (Colombia)     118       108       99  
INTERNATIONAL                        
Savía Perú     1       1       1  
Ecopetrol America Inc.     -       -       -  
Total Natural Gas Production (International)     1       1       1  
Total Natural Gas Production     119       109       100  

 

 

(1) Conversion between mcfpd and boepd is performed at 5,700 mcfpd to 1 boepd.
(2) The Eastern region is included for 2012, the first full year in which it operated its fields after its creation in 2011.
(3) Equion production figures correspond to its equivalent daily productions since its month of acquisition.

 

40
 

 

Northeastern Region

 

The largest production of natural gas in Colombia is located in the Northeastern region, which we develop primarily under joint venture contracts. We developed the Guajira natural gas reserves with our partner Chevron. The Cusiana reserve is developed along with Equion and Total. Additionally, Ecopetrol S.A. directly operated the reserves in the Cupiagua field.

 

Natural gas production in the Northeastern region averaged 548.1 mcfpd and 3.2 bpd of liquids from the natural gas process in 2012. The natural gas produced from these fields is used to supply local demand and to meet our commitments to supply natural gas to Venezuela. See “—Marketing and Supply—Natural Gas Distribution.” We continue re-injection of natural gas in the Cusiana field. This production outcome was leveraged by Chuchupa and Ballena assets operated by Chevron, which represented a production of 339.0 mcfpd in 2012 and 363.3 mcfpd in 2011.

 

Lifting and Production Costs

 

Our consolidated average production costs on a Peso basis increased to Ps$23,088 during 2012 from Ps$21,605 during 2011 and Ps$18,940 during 2010, mainly due to: (1) increased costs from joint ventures, related to higher volumes of water production and related disposal costs, (2) high-price clauses in our joint venture agreements, which assign additional production to us when oil prices are higher than a reference price (the “High-Price Clauses”), (3) a 2.62% increase in production volumes and (4) an increase in direct operation costs. Our consolidated average lifting costs on a dollar basis increased to US$11.93 in 2012 from US$10.43 in 2011 and US$9.83 in 2010, as a result of the above-mentioned factors and a 2.7% appreciation of the average exchange rate of the Peso against the U.S. dollar.

 

Our consolidated average lifting costs differ from our consolidated average production costs because our lifting costs do not include costs related to self-consumption of hydrocarbons included in the production process, such as by our small refineries and natural gas liquid plants.

 

The following table sets forth our crude oil and natural gas average sales price, aggregate average lifting costs and aggregate average unit production costs for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    For the year ended December 31,  
    2012     2011     2010  
Crude Oil Average Sales Price                        
(U.S. dollars per barrel) (1)     103.47       99.30       72.42  
Crude Oil Average Sales Price                        
(Ps$per barrel) (1)     186,004       183,514       137,493  
Natural Gas Average Sales Price                        
(U.S. dollars per thousand cf)     5.53       4.62       3.42  
Natural Gas Average Sales Price                        
(Ps$per thousand cf)     9,944       8,534       6,487  
Aggregate Average Unit Production Costs                        
(U.S. dollars per boe) (2)     12.84       11.70       9.98  
Aggregate Average Unit Production Cost                        
(Ps$per boe) (2)     23,088       21,605       18,940  
Aggregate Average Lifting Costs                        
(U.S. dollars per boe) (3)(4)     11.93       10.43       9.83  
Aggregate Average Lifting Costs                        
(Ps$per boe) (3)(4)     21,441       19,266       18,652  

 

 

(1) Corresponds to our average sales price on a consolidated basis.
(2) Unit production costs correspond to consolidated average costs on total production volumes net of royalties. Production costs do not include costs related to transport, commercialization and administrative expenses.
(3) Lifting costs per barrel are calculated based on total production, which are net of royalties, and correspond to our lifting costs on a consolidated basis.
(4) We calculate aggregate average lifting cost by taking our production cost and dividing it by our produced volumes net of royalties as the denominator.

 

Reserves

 

Our proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas, net of royalties to the Nation, at December 31 2012, totaled 1,876.7 million boe, which represents a 1.1% increase from the 1,856.7 million boe registered in 2011. Our crude oil proved reserves in 2012 were 1,370.3 million barrels of crude oil and, in 2011, 1,371.0 million barrels. Our natural gas proved reserves increased to 2,886 billion cubic feet, or bcf, from 2,768 bcf of reserves in 2011. In 2011, our proved reserves increased 8% from the 1,714 million boe registered in 2010. The increase in our reserves in 2012 is mainly due to (1) a 44.2 million boe increase corresponding to revisions of previous estimates, (2) a 65.3 million boe increase corresponding to improved recovery, (3) a 142.8 million boe increase corresponding to extensions and discoveries and (4) a 232.4 million boe decrease corresponding to production.

 

41
 

 

Hydrocarbon reserves were calculated in accordance with SEC regulations and the requirements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB. Ecopetrol’s reserves process is supervised and coordinated by the Director of Reserves, who reports to the Chief Financial Officer. The Reserves Directorate is comprised of reserves coordinators, who are petroleum engineers with experience of more than 15 years in reservoir characterization, field development, estimation and reporting of reserves and that have supervision and supporting responsibilities with the professionals involved in the estimation and reporting process.

 

Reserves are first estimated internally. This process is supervised and coordinated by the corporate manager of reservoirs, a geologist who holds a master’s degree in geology and has more than 20 years of experience in projects associated with reservoir characterization and development, estimation, and reporting of reserves. The employees involved in the reserves process meet the Society of Petroleum Engineers, or SPE, qualifications for reserves estimators. Internally estimated reserves are submitted to an external audit process, which was conducted by the External Engineers (Ryder Scott, DeGolyer and MacNaughton and Gaffney, Cline & Associates). These firms have audited 99% of our total net proved reserves for 2012, 2011, and 2010. According to our corporate policy, we report the reserves values obtained from the External Engineers.

 

The reserves process ends when the Reserves Directorate consolidates the results and presents them to the Reserves Committee, whose members are the Chief Financial Officer, the Exploration and Production Executive Vice-President and the Vice-President of Strategy. Results are presented to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and finally approved by the Board of Directors.

 

The audit process was conducted in accordance with SEC definitions and rules set forth in Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X and the disclosure guidelines contained in the SEC’s Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting final rule dated December 31, 2008 and effective as of January 1, 2010. The information presented below and elsewhere in this annual report is based on an external audit of 99% of our total reserves, prepared by the External Engineers under SEC definitions and rules. The remaining 1% corresponds to our own internal calculations, conducted using SEC definitions and rules, as described above. Our crude oil and natural gas net proved reserves include reserves from our subsidiaries located in the United States (Gulf of Mexico) and Peru, and Equión and Hocol’s assets in Colombia.

 

The reserves information presented in this section is based on the SEC’s definitions and rules used for U.S. GAAP purposes. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Oil and Gas Reserves” and Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

42
 

 

The following table sets forth our estimated net proved reserves (developed and undeveloped) of crude oil and gas for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    At December 31,  
    2012     2011     2010  
    Crude Oil
(million
barrels)
    Gas (bcf)     Crude Oil
(million
barrels)
    Gas (bcf)     Crude Oil
(million
barrels)
    Gas (bcf)  
PROVED DEVELOPED RESERVES                                                
                                                 
Total (Colombia)     922.4       2,523.6       840.4       2,206.1       780.7       2,234.6  
Total (International)     10.9       12.3       15.4       23.4       20.0       27.0  
North America     1.1       2.0       3.7       2.3       4.1       2.3  
South America     9.8       10.3       11.7       21.1       15.9       24.8  
                                                 
TOTAL PROVED DEVELOPED RESERVES     933.3       2,535.9       855.8       2,229.5       800.7       2,261.7  
                                                 
PROVED UNDEVELOPED RESERVES                                                
                                                 
Total (Colombia)     431.6       340.6       507.5       537.0       421.3       460.9  
Total (International)     5.4       10.0       7.7       1.9       14.3       0.0  
North America     2.9       12.0       0.0       0.0       0.0       0.0  
South America     2.5       (2.1 )     7.7       1.9       14.3       0.0  
                                                 
TOTAL PROVED UNDEVELOPED RESERVES     437.0       350.6       515.2       538.9       435.6       460.9  
                                                 
TOTAL PROVED RESERVES (DEVELOPED AND UNDEVELOPED)     1,370.3       2,886.5       1,371.0       2,768.4       1,236.3       2,722.6  

 

 

The following table sets forth our estimated consolidated net proved developed and undeveloped reserves of crude oil and natural gas at December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

Net proved developed and undeveloped Reserves
                   
    Crude Oil (million
barrels)
    Gas (bcf)     Total (million boe)  
                   
Reserves at December 31, 2010     1,236.3       2,722.6       1,714.0  
Revisions of previous estimates     107.6       (260.8 )     61.8  
Improved recovery     14.8       3.6       15.4  
Purchases of minerals in place     18.3       93.3       34.6  
Extensions and discoveries     184.5       386.2       252.3  
Production     (190.5 )     (176.5 )     (221.5 )
                         
Reserves at December 31, 2011     1,371.0       2,768.4       1,856.7  
Revisions of previous estimates     42.7       8.8       44.2  
Improved recovery     65.3       0.0       65.3  
Purchases of minerals in place     0.0       0.0       0.0  
Extensions and discoveries     90.4       298.6       142.8  
Production     (199.2 )     (189.3 )     (232.4 )
Reserves at December 31, 2012     1,370.3       2,886.5       1,876.7  
                         
Net proved developed reserves                        
At December 31, 2010     800.7       2,261.7       1,197.5  
At December 31, 2011     855.8       2,229.5       1,246.9  
At December 31, 2012     933.3       2,535.9       1,378.2  

 

The above-referenced reserve amounts, net of royalty payments to the Nation, are the same amounts used to reconcile Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements under FASB ASC 932.

 

The Company’s revisions, on a consolidated basis, during 2012 amounted to 44.2 million boe, corresponding primarily to the following:

 

· Pauto Field: Sales of liquids from the natural gas process, volumes associated with our gas processing plant, better production performance and new development projects focused in gas conversion activities and drilling, representing a 19.4 million boe increase.

 

· Caño Limón Field: Better production performance, representing a 13.9 million boe increase.

 

43
 

 

The revisions described above represented 75% of the additions to reserves revisions in 2012, while the revisions with respect to the remaining 10.9 million boe resulted from varying increases and decreases from a variety of fields, including Apiay, Quifa and others.

 

The Company’s improved recovery during 2012 amounted to 65.3 million boe, which corresponded mainly to new proved areas under waterflooding in the La Cira-Infantas, Casabe and Tibu fields.

 

The Company’s extensions and discoveries during 2012 amounted to 142.8 million boe, which corresponded to 16.2 million boe of newly discovered fields and 126.6 million boe of extensions of proved acreage. The newly discovered fields corresponded mainly to Ecopetrol S.A.’s Cajua, Chipiron fields, Hocol’s Mamey-Bonga fields and Ecopetrol America’s Dalmatian field.

 

In terms of extensions of proved acreage (126.6 million boe) in 2012, 70% was associated with activities in the following fields: 25.5 million boe was associated with the Castilla field, where the Company plans additional drilling activities in order to cover new proved areas, 47.8 million boe was associated with new sales agreements permitting increases in future gas sales in the Cupiagua field and 15.4 million boe was associated with new proved areas in the Quifa and Chichimene fields. The remaining 30% corresponds to smaller changes in several other fields.

 

In terms of proved undeveloped reserves, during 2012 the Company added approximately 101 million boe and converted 212 million boe. Total proved undeveloped reserves decreased by 111.5 million boe to 498.5 million boe at December 31, 2012 when compared to 610 million boe at December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2012, 88% of our total proved undeveloped reserves corresponded to crude oil.

 

The additions in the Company’s proved undeveloped reserves in 2012 correspond to revisions of previous estimates (17%), improved recovery (26%) and extensions and discoveries (57%). Revisions of previous estimates correspond primarily to variations in economic factors, adjustments based on production behavior and updated development plans in several fields, mainly in Pauto, Caño Limon, Apiay and Quifa.

 

The increases due to improved recovery are associated mainly with the waterflood projects of the La Cira Infantas, Casabe and Tibu fields, as described above. The Company’s extensions and discoveries relate mainly to extensions of proved acreage, corresponding to projects previously described in the Castilla, Cupiagua, Chichimene and Quifa fields.

 

Of the total amount of proved undeveloped reserves that we had at the end of 2011 (610 million boe), we converted approximately 212 million boe, or 35%, to proved developed reserves during 2012, which resulted mainly from (1) crude oil projects, primarily associated with the development of heavy crude oil fields in Castilla, Rubiales, Chichimene and Quifa in the Central region, which represented approximately 59% of the total conversion and (2) availability of a new compression facilities for gas processing in the Chuchupa field, which represented 18% of the total conversion. The remaining 23% is associated with development execution in other fields such as the Casabe, Cira Infantas, Apiay fields, among others. The amount of investment made during 2012 to convert proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves was US$2,155 million.

 

Present Activities

 

During the first quarter of 2013, Ecopetrol S.A. drilled five stratigraphic wells, out of which two exhibited evidence of hydrocarbons (Segua 1 and Circe 1). In addition, two wells evidenced hydrocarbon presence (Pastinaca 1 and Venus 2), from a total of three A3/A2 wells drilled by Ecopetrol S.A.

 

During the first quarter of 2013, Hocol drilled one A3/A2 well (Canario Sur 1) which evidenced presence of hydrocarbons.

 

Regarding offshore activity, Ecopetrol America placed the most competitive bids for six blocks in the “Central Planning Area Lease Sale 227” round held in New Orleans.  Ecopetrol America partnered with Murphy Exploration and Production in two blocks; with Anadarko US Offshore Corporation, MCX Gulf of Mexico LLC and JX Nippon Oil Exploration (U.S.A) Limited in two blocks, and in two blocks Ecopetrol America has 100% interest.

 

44
 

 

Contractual Arrangements for the Exploration and Production of Crude Oil and Natural Gas in Colombia

 

To address the country’s exploration and production needs, Colombia has modified the contractual regime governing the exploration, development and production of hydrocarbons on a number of occasions since its introduction in 1970. The exploration and production contracts entered into with our business partners provide for the production split, the length of the exploration and production terms, and royalty payments.

 

Under Colombian law, an existing contract cannot be modified because of a change to the contractual regime, except in the case of public order regulations. As a result, contracts that were executed prior to the issuance of a new contractual regime remain in full force and are not affected by the subsequent regime. At December 31, 2012, we were party to 114 agreements with partners and 27 exploration and production agreements with the ANH in which we do not have any partners.

 

Under joint venture contracts entered into before March 1994, which include the Cusiana and Cupiagua crude oil fields, among others, the private investor explored a previously agreed upon area at its own risk and expense. Thereafter, we had the option to become a joint venture partner by reimbursing the investor 50% of the exploration costs of oil wells within commercially viable fields and 50% interest of all future development costs related to those fields. Once we became a partner, we had a 50% interest in the production of the field. If we decided not to become a joint venture partner within a certain period of time, the private investor had the right to enter into a sole risk contract for the field’s crude oil production until it had recovered 200% of its investment and 100% of its total costs. Thereafter, we could participate in the development of the field and all future costs and expenses were automatically shared with our partner, as if we had elected to become a joint venture partner in the field.

 

Beginning in 1994, modifications were made to standard joint venture contracts to maintain the private investor’s share of production at 50% until aggregate production exceeded 60 million barrels. Thereafter, our share increased gradually, up to a maximum of 70% of production. In 1995, further modifications to the standard joint venture contracts required us to pay for half of the exploration costs, not only for wells that ultimately proved to be productive, but also for dry wells, stratigraphic wells and seismic exploration in fields that became commercially viable. The modifications also provided for competitive bidding for the right to explore and develop marginal fields (defined according to certain technical, financial and operational criteria). In the bidding process, private companies presented bids based on percentages of production they would pay us in exchange for the rights to develop these fields. Winning bidders were responsible for all future investment and operating costs related to the field.

 

The standard joint venture contract was once again modified in 1997 in order to promote private sector activity in the development of inactive areas and small fields and in the exploration for natural gas. These modifications extended the exploration periods, increased the levels of reimbursement for private companies’ exploration costs and provided for the reimbursement of exploration costs in real terms and denominated in U.S. dollars.

 

In 1999, Colombia adopted two additional modifications to the standard terms, applicable to new joint venture contracts:

 

· Reduction of Our Initial Participation. Our initial participation under the joint venture contracts signed after this reform, was reduced from 50% to 30%. As of December 31, 2012, we had 37 joint venture contracts outstanding in which our participation was greater than or equal to 50%, and 17 joint venture agreements where our participation was less than 50% .

 

· Modified R Factor. The Government modified the formula used to determine the increase in our share of total production, or the R Factor. The R Factor is calculated by dividing accumulated revenues in cash by investments and costs. If the R Factor increases above a certain profitability threshold, then our share of production increases above the initial 30%. Pursuant to the 1999 modifications, we raised the profitability threshold at which the R Factor triggers an increase in our share from 1.0 to 1.5. Additionally, the R Factor was calculated prior to the 1999 modifications in constant U.S. dollars. The new calculation method was designed to prevent inflation from causing an increase in the R Factor and a corresponding increase in our share.

 

We have also entered into various types of arrangements in connection with our own crude oil and natural gas exploration and production projects. These arrangements include: risk participation contracts, incremental production agreements, shared risk production contracts, risk services production contracts, discovered undeveloped fields contracts and sole risk contracts.

 

45
 

 

· Risk-Participation Contracts. Under these contracts, we assume 20% of the exploration costs and risks at the beginning of the second year in exchange for a larger participation in the future production and equal representation on the executive committee of the joint venture. At December 31, 2012, we had four risk participation contracts in effect.

 

· Incremental Production Agreements. We currently have two types of incremental production agreements, the standard incremental production agreements, or SIPAs, and the development of incremental production project agreements, or DIPAs.

 

Under SIPAs, we calculate the total number of proved developed reserves available in a specific field or well and then establish a base production curve for the reserves. Any future production exceeding the curve, which we refer to as incremental production, results from extracting proved undeveloped reserves or probable reserves which require additional investments funded by our partners under the SIPA. We have the right to a previously specified percentage of the incremental production. Our percentage participation varies depending on the total amount invested by our partners and on the R Factor which cannot be lower than 1.5. The volume produced under the production curve is not shared with our partners. At December 31, 2012, we had five SIPAs in effect.

 

Under DIPAs, we must file a request with the Ministry of Mines and Energy to approve an incremental production project for a field that we directly operate. If the project is approved, we agree with our partners to develop the field and we determine mandatory investment thresholds for our partners. We are not required to fund any investment. The production from the field is distributed to us and our partners receive a percentage of the total production from the field that varies depending on the invested amount. Once the mandatory investment stage expires, we agree with our partners on the percentage of production, total costs and additional investments to be paid by each party. We pay 20% royalties to the Nation on the base production curve and variable royalties on any incremental production. Additionally, in the event of higher prices and large volumes, we have adjustment clauses to increase our share in the production. At December 31, 2012, we had one DIPA in effect.

 

· Shared-Risk Production Contracts. Under these contracts, we remain as operators of the field and assume responsibility for 50% of all investments and costs. Private oil companies submit bids to enter into agreements with us based upon the production percentage they will assign to us. The successful bidder has the right to enter into the shared risk contract with us. At December 31, 2012, we had two shared risk production contracts outstanding .

 

· Risk Service Production Contracts. We began using the risk service production contract in January 1998 to increase production through the use of new technologies in crude oil fields then operated by our partners. All investments in new technologies were made by our partners who received a previously specified fee per barrel. At December 31, 2012, we had one risk service contract outstanding for the development of the Rancho Hermoso field located in the Mirador formation.

 

· Discovered Undeveloped Fields Contracts. We have entered into discovered undeveloped fields contracts to promote exploration by private companies of both undeveloped and inactive fields. Under these contracts, the contracting party assumes all costs and expenses for the development and operation of a field in exchange for a certain amount of production. At December 31, 2012, we had 16 discovered undeveloped fields contracts outstanding, of which, at March 1, 2013, two were terminated .

 

· Sole Risk Contracts. We have entered into sole risk operations, where we benefit from successful exploratory efforts. Our partner in such operations has the right to the field’s crude oil production until it has recovered the percentage (which varies according to the agreement) of its investment and of its total costs. Thereafter, we participate in the development of the field, and all the future costs and expenses are automatically shared with our partner as if we had selected to become a joint venture partner in the agreement. As of December 31, 2012, we had 17 sole risk operations.

 

At December 31, 2012 we also had the following agreements:

 

· One Service and Technical Cooperation Contract with the Universidad Industrial de Santander for research and development of the Colorado Field which was terminated on March 10, 2013; and

 

· One Technical Alliance Agreement with a service company to support the operation of Casabe field in which we maintain operations and ownership of 100% reserves.

 

46
 

 

Current Joint Venture Contractual Regime

 

In 2004, the authority to enter into exploration and production contracts was assigned to the ANH under a different exploration and production contractual scheme. We became an operator like any other company, competing with all other regional and international oil companies in Colombia for exploration and production opportunities under the same conditions and without any special rights. Decree Law 1760 of 2003 gave us the right to maintain in effect all contracts we had entered into prior to January 1, 2004, as well as to have absolute discretion as to whether or not such contracts would be extended after their stated termination date. If we decide not to extend the contracts, the production rights and assets related to the relevant block will revert to us and we would have the right, at no additional cost, to exploit the associated reserves indefinitely. Contracts entered into by us after January 1, 2004 that are not extended by the ANH will revert to the ANH and not to us.

 

In 2004, the ANH introduced two new model contracts to replace the previously used joint venture contracts: the exploration and production contract and the technical evaluation agreement.

 

· Exploration and Production Contracts . Under exploration and production contracts the contractor, including us, assumes all exploration and production activities. The contractor also assumes all risks and costs of exploration and is the sole owner of all production and assets involved in the exploration and production activities for the term of the contract. There is no partnership or joint venture between the contractor and the ANH.

 

· Technical Evaluation Agreements . The scope of technical evaluation agreements is limited to exploration activities. Under this type of agreement, the contractor can evaluate a specific area and decide whether or not it will enter into an exploration and production contract. The contractor assumes all risks and costs of the activities and operations.

 

In June 2010, the Santiago de las Atalayas Contract, one of the most significant exploration and production contracts based on crude oil and natural gas output and reserves, expired. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the right to develop and commercialize the existing crude oil and natural gas reserves in the Cupiagua and Cupiagua Sur fields reverted back to us.

 

We entered into several agreements or “Convenios” with the ANH in areas directly operated by Ecopetrol S.A., where Ecopetrol S.A. holds total exploration and production rights up to the point when revenue from the well falls below the costs of operations set by the company (the “economic limit”). Article 2 of Decree 2288 of 2004 (a regulatory decree pursuant to Decree Law 1760 of 2003), establishes that the ANH shall determine the general criteria according to which the agreements pertaining to the areas directly operated by Ecopetrol shall be subscribed.

 

Agreements must also be entered into between Ecopetrol with the ANH according to Article 2 of Decree 2288 of 2004, when joint venture contracts subscribed before December 31, 2003, expire during their production phase. The purpose of these agreements is to define the terms and conditions under which Ecopetrol S.A. can exercise its exclusive right of exploration and production of hydrocarbons—granted by Decree Law 1760 of 2003—in the agreement area until the economic limit. Annex I presents a list of those agreements ( Convenios ).

 

We have entered into a number of exploration and production contracts with regional and international oil companies. Annex II includes a list of our contracts still in force as of December 31, 2012 with a complete description of their main characteristics, and Annex III includes a list of our contracts still in force as of December 31, 2012, which are in the exploration phase, with a complete description of their main characteristics.

 

Management of Crude Oil and Natural Gas Joint Ventures

 

Every crude oil and natural gas joint venture has an executive committee that makes all technical, financial and operational decisions. All major decisions must be made unanimously. Although we do not operate a number of these joint ventures, we have an active role in the decision-making process and development of the projects. As a result, we have direct control over the development of joint ventures, even for those joint ventures in which we have less than a majority economic interest.

 

Refining and Petrochemicals

 

Summary

 

Our two main refineries in Colombia are the Barrancabermeja refinery, which we directly own and operate, and Reficar, a wholly-owned subsidiary, which we also operate. We also own and operate two other minor refineries — Orito and Apiay. Our refineries produce a full range of refined products, including gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, and heavy fuel oils, among others.

 

47
 

 

In 2012, we invested Ps$4.4 trillion (approximately US$2.4 billion) in refining and petrochemicals, an increase compared to the Ps$3.0 trillion (approximately US$1.5 billion) invested in 2011, mainly due to the investments related to the expansion and modernization of the Reficar refinery. Investments in Ecopetrol S.A. in 2012 included 45 different projects, such as re-conversion, upgrading, equipment replacement and environmental projects.

 

The following table sets forth our daily average installed and actual refinery capacity for each of the last three years.

 

    For the year ended December 31,  
    2012     2011     2010  
    Capacity     Through-
put
    % Use     Capacity     Through-
put
    % Use     Capacity     Through-
put
    % Use  
    ( bpd )                 ( bpd )                 ( bpd )              
                                                       
Barrancabermeja     250,000       219,385       88 %     250,000       225,990       90 %     250,000       225,259       90 %
Reficar     80,000       74,545       93 %     80,000       76,770       96 %     80,000       67,674       84 %
Apiay     2,500       1,617       65 %     2,500       1,768       71 %     2,500       1,631       65 %
Orito     2,500       793       32 %     2,500       1,103       44 %     2,500       1,480       59 %
Total     335,000       296,340       88 %     335,000       305,631       91 %     335,000       296,044       88 %

 

Barrancabermeja

 

At Barrancabermeja, we produce a variety of fuels, such as regular and premium unleaded gasoline, diesel fuel, kerosene, jet fuel, aviation fuel, LPG, fuel oil and sulfur. We also produce petrochemicals and industrial products, including, paraffin waxes, lube base oils, low-density polyethylene, aromatics, asphalts, alkylates, cyclohexane and aliphatic solvents, as well as refinery grade propylene. The Barrancabermeja refinery supplies approximately 70% of the fuels consumed in Colombia.

 

The average conversion ratio for Barrancabermeja during 2012 was 76.5%. The gross refining margin decreased from US$11.22 per barrel in 2011 to US$10.87 per barrel in 2012 mainly due to the higher cost of crude oil as a result of the better crude oil export prices for Ecopetrol, to which they are indexed.

 

Barrancabermeja is currently undergoing a modernization process, (the Barrancabermeja Refinery Modernization Project, or PMRB), which aims to modernize the Barrancabermeja refinery to process heavy Colombian crudes and to upgrade its processing configuration from medium to deep conversion. During 2012, the PMRB continued to make progress towards beginning the contracting phase of the main components of the project and the modification of the Crude Unit U-250 to be developed in 2013. We also advanced our forestry and fauna sustainable resettlement, in compliance with the local environmental authority. The project is in the process of approval for its Environmental Management Plan, and once this license is obtained, a comprehensive review will be conducted to update its schedule.

 

48
 

 

The following table sets forth the production of refined products of Barrancabermeja for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    For the year ended December 31,  
    2012     2011     2010  
    (bpd)  
LPG, Propylene and Butane     14,546       13,116       15,140  
Gasoline Fuels and Naphtha     71,552       74,196       76,542  
Diesel     52,486       53,319       52,801  
Jet Fuel and Kerosene     19,043       18,562       18,324  
Fuel Oil     51,618       52,179       49,570  
Lube Base Oils and Waxes     2,011       2,001       2,216  
Aromatics and Solvents     2,953       3,293       2,739  
Asphalts and Aromatic Tar     5,892       7,495       6,759  
Polyethylene, Sulfur and Sulfuric Acid     1,149       957       1,038 (1)
Total     221,250       225,118       225,129 (1)
Difference between Inventory of Intermediate Products     208       386       725 (1)
Total Production     221,458       225,504       225,854 (1)

 

 

(1) Amounts adjusted upwards based on updated measurements.

 

During 2012, we delivered 62.9 thousand bpd of low sulfur gasoline (less than 300 parts per million sulfur content) and 76.3 thousand bpd of low sulfur diesel to meet existing fuel quality standards. We delivered two low sulfur diesel qualities in 2012—less than 50 and less than 500 parts per million sulfur content.

 

Reficar

 

As part of our Strategic Plan, we expect to increase the competitiveness and profitability of Reficar through the modernization of its facilities and processes, and the improvement of its reliability. We plan to increase the refinery’s production capacity to 165 thousand bpd by 2014 and improve refining margins by processing lower cost heavy crude oils, raising the conversion ratio, and producing a higher quality product slate. We also expect to satisfy existing environmental regulations for fuels by reducing sulfur content in gasoline and diesel fuel, thus complying with national and international fuel standards.

 

On December 30, 2011, with approval from the Ministry of Finance, Reficar executed the project financing agreements for the expansion and modernization of the Reficar refinery in the amount of US$3.5 billion with a repayment term of 14 years. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.” During 2012, Reficar drew US$2.67 billion under these financial agreements.

 

In February 2013, Reficar requested contributions from Ecopetrol under the Construction Support Agreement in an amount of US$500 million, of which US$250 million has already been provided, with the remaining amount to be supplied throughout the rest of the year. As the project’s budget and schedule are being revised, we may be required to provide additional funding in excess of this amount. Any increase in the project’s capital expenditures is expected to be funded under the Construction Support Agreement between Reficar and Ecopetrol.

 

49
 

 

The following table sets forth the production of refined products of Reficar for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

   

For the year ended December 31, (1)

 
    2012     2011     2010  
    (bpd)  
LPG, Propylene and Butane     3,447       5,526       4,056  
Motor Fuels     21,602       25,515       23,826  
Diesel     17,982       20,533       16,516  
Jet Fuel and Kerosene     6,776       6,730       6,252  
Fuel Oil     18,110       17,469       14,907  
Aromatic Tar     729       1,225       1,252  
Other Products     29       44       42  
Total     68,676       77,042       66,852  
Difference between Inventory of Intermediate Products     6,521       1,130       1,722  
Total Production     75,197       78,172       68,573  

 

 

(1) The table shows the entire production of Reficar.

 

In 2012, production by Reficar decreased to 75.2 thousand bpd, from 78.2 thousand bpd in 2011. Reficar’s operation suffered an unplanned production stoppage at the fluid Catalytic Unit – FCC, between February and May 2012. The turnaround of its FCC unit had been initially planned for 45 days. However, damages in the rotor of the cracking unit’s gas compressors lengthen the turnaround to 90.65 days, disturbing the production of gasoline, LPG, butane and propylene.

 

The average conversion ratio for Reficar during 2012 was 68.07%. The gross refining margin decreased from US$6.68 per barrel in 2011, to US$5.31 per barrel in 2012, mainly due to a longer cracker turnaround and lower prices of refined products such as gasoline, diesel and jet fuel, compared to 2011.

 

In 2011 we started to purchase low-sulfur gasoline and continued purchasing low-sulfur diesel and biodiesel to improve the quality of the diesel and gasoline produced at Reficar. Reficar is currently purchasing biodiesel fuel in the local market and mixing it with its production of diesel to reduce sulfur content to meet local specifications.

 

Petrochemicals and Other Products

 

We own and operate four petrochemical plants and one paraffin and lube plant located within Barrancabermeja, producing a variety of products, including aromatics, cyclohexane, paraffin waxes, lube base oils, polyethylene and solvents. In 2012, we produced 36,882 tons of low-density polyethylene and 774.5 thousand barrels of aromatics (benzene, toluene, xylene, orthoxylene, heavy aromatics and cyclohexane), a 27% increase and 16% decrease compared to a production of 28,992 tons of low-density polyethylene and 926 thousand barrels of aromatics in 2011, respectively.

 

Propilco

 

During 2012, Propilco’s production totaled 410 thousand tons of petrochemical products, a 7.6% increase compared to the 381 thousand tons produced in 2011. The contribution margin in 2012 was 10.3% higher than in 2011, an increase from 260 per ton in 2011 to 287 per ton in 2012. The following table sets forth Propilco’s average capacity and throughput for each of the last three years.

 

    For the year ended December 31,  
    2012     2011     2010  
    (Metric Tons)  
                   
Average capacity     475,000       475,000       475,278  
Throughput     409,628       380,878       407,411  
% Use     86 %     80 %     86 %

 

50
 

 

Transportation and Logistics

 

Summary

 

Cenit

 

In 2012, we incorporated Cenit as a wholly-owned subsidiary specializing in logistics and transportation of hydrocarbons within Colombia. The creation of Cenit aims to enhance the strategic and logistical framework of Colombia’s oil industry in response to the increase in hydrocarbon production and higher sales of crudes and refined products, both within Colombia and in international markets. Furthermore, it aims to strengthen and expand the transportation network while maintaining high standards of industrial safety, reliability as well as contributing to the environmental preservation.

 

We expect the creation of Cenit to represent a signal of clear rules to the market, by separating Ecopetrol’s role as owner, planner, operator and user of transportation systems. Cenit is expected to operate with an open model, in which all the interested parties will have the opportunity of accessing its transportation infrastructure. On the other hand, we have also ensured that Cenit will provide the capacity to meet our transportation needs.

 

This new hydrocarbon transportation framework is expected to produce significant advantages to Ecopetrol by allowing the company to focus on its strategic business segments and allocate higher investment to other key segments, while Cenit takes the lead in finding and exploiting profitable opportunities in transportation and logistics.

 

We expect that Cenit will offer its customers a wide portfolio of services that include transportation, storage, logistics and multimodal transportation services for hydrocarbons in Colombia. In addition, our Vice-Presidency of Transportation and Logistics will focus its efforts in the operation and maintenance of the infrastructure and strengthening our risk-management model to support its processes and develop the required infrastructure projects to meet the needs of our customers.

 

Cenit’s authorized and outstanding capital amounts to Ps.$1.3 billion and Ps.$10 million, respectively. In October 2012, we transferred our direct interests in Ocensa, ODC, Oleoducto Bicentenario, ODL and Serviport to Cenit. On April 1, 2013, Ecopetrol completed the transfer of hydrocarbon transport and logistics assets to Cenit.

 

Beginning in the second half of 2012, Ecopetrol and Cenit have been working to finalize the transition process in order for Cenit to start operations in the first half of 2013. As part of that process, on April 1, 2013 we entered into a transportation agreement with Cenit, pursuant to which it will provide us with hydrocarbon transportation and logistics services through the transportation assets transferred to it as an in-kind capitalization. On April 1, 2013, we also entered into an operation and maintenance agreement with Cenit, pursuant to which we will perform the activities related to the operation of the transportation assets transferred to it, as well as their maintenance. In return, Cenit will pay us variable monthly installments for the services rendered. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Agreements—Cenit.”

 

Vice-Presidency of Transportation and Logistics

 

Along with the creation of Cenit and the transfer of the transportation assets to it during 2013, the Vice-Presidency of Transportation and Logistics redefined its strategy, which is to be focused on strengthening our operations and maintenance services, comprehensive logistics solutions and risk management, in order to ensure customer satisfaction while adding value.

 

The transportation and logistics segment includes the transportation of crude oil, motor fuels, fuel oil and other refined products. Since 2009, our transportation and logistics segment has been transporting diesel and biofuels.

 

As of December 31, 2012, we, directly or indirectly with private sector participants, owned, operated and maintained an extensive network of crude oil and refined products pipelines connecting our own and third-party production centers and terminals to refineries, major distribution points and export facilities. We directly own 41% of the total crude oil pipeline shipping capacity, a 1% more than in 2011 and 99% of the total product pipeline shipping capacity in Colombia. When aggregated with the crude oil pipelines in which we own an interest, we own 77% of the oil pipeline shipping capacity in Colombia. The total length of our crude-oil pipelines decreased with respect to 2011 mainly due to a higher accuracy in our measurement during 2012 through the inline inspection method. Multi-purpose pipelines length increased mainly due to the construction of an alternative line in the Galán – Bucaramanga system.

 

51
 

 

By December 31, 2012, our network of crude oil and multi-purpose pipelines was approximately 8,760 kilometers in length. The transportation network we own directly, in partnership with other companies, and in joint venture partnerships, consists of approximately 5,042 kilometers of main crude oil pipeline networks connecting various fields to the Barrancabermeja refinery and Reficar, as well as to export facilities. We directly own 3,029 kilometers of crude oil pipeline and an additional 2,013 kilometers of crude oil pipeline with our business partners. We also own 3,717 kilometers of multi-purpose pipelines for transportation of refined products from the Barrancabermeja refinery and from Reficar to wholesale distribution points.

 

During 2012, we met our customer satisfaction index goal, and we maintained our ISO 9001:2008, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 certifications for all of our transportation processes. We also attained the certification by the Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF), which provides standards for hydrocarbons reception, storage, dispatch by pipes and pipelines and the import and export facilities of our docks.

 

We are currently developing our transportation infrastructure in order to meet our increased transportation needs in Colombia and any additional needs, which may result from new discoveries.

 

Special Programs

 

During 2012, our Vice-Presidency of Transportation and Logistics continued to focus its efforts on strengthening its practices in order to anticipate potential natural events that may cause impairments to the transportation facilities and damages in the surrounding environment and communities. The following were some of the steps taken in order to ensure the continuity of the integrity and the contingency programs:

 

Integrity Program:

 

This program is aimed at reinforcing our operational risk management model, enhancing the integrity of the transportation infrastructure and handling the environmental conditions in the places where our systems operate. The program has strengthened the risk management model of the Vice-Presidency of Transportation and Logistics by improving risk identification, assessment and management, especially in relation to weather conditions and third-party damage.

 

In addition, new technologies to monitor the transportation infrastructure and its surroundings have been updated and incorporated into routine inspections and maintenance practices, meeting the highest international standards. Pipeline replacement projects in areas susceptible to incidents with major consequences were executed.

 

Under this program, there was a decrease of 15% in very-high and high-risk levels at our transportation infrastructure and a decrease of 36% in medium-risk levels when compared to 2011.

 

Contingency Program:

 

During 2012, our contingency program carried out activities aimed at reducing the potential consequences of a loss of containment as a result of any event in the transportation infrastructure that might impact nearby communities and the environment, by reinforcing our cooperation with the local communities and the local emergency services.

 

Those activities include (1) signing of contracts with 15 branches of the Colombian Red Cross to communicate emergency plans in 1,349 local communities; (2) planning and execution of level I (operational drills, performed within Ecopetrol´s facilities, that triggers internal procedures of the company), level II (local and regional drills, involving emergency services and local authorities in the area of influence) , level III (national drills, with the participation of the Risk and Disaster Management Unit of the Colombian Presidency); (3) planning and execution of the Annual Expert Meeting to address our emergency response in coordination with the Risk and Disasters Management Unit of the Colombian Presidency; and (4) designing the structure of a new emergency-response model for Ecopetrol.

 

In 2013, these programs will continue their planned activities in order to achieve those objectives to guarantee the welfare of local communities.

 

52
 

 

The map below shows the main transportation networks owned by our business partners and us.

 

TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE

 

 

53
 

 

Pipelines

 

In 2012, pipelines in which we own an interest transported a total of 916.2 thousand bpd of crude oil and 302.7 bpd of refined products for a total of 1.22 million bpd in 2012, a 1.2% increase when compared to 2011. In 2011, pipelines transported a total of 1.20 million bpd of crude oil and refined products compared to 1.03 million bpd in 2010.

 

In October 2012, we transferred our interests in Ocensa, ODC, Oleoducto Bicentenario de Colombia, ODL and Serviport to Cenit, which is expected to perform all of the hydrocarbon transportation activities that we used to perform directly. We have entered into a transportation agreement with Cenit, pursuant to which it will transport part of our crude oil and refined products, as well as those of certain third parties. See “Item 4. Overview by Business Segment—Transportation and Logistics—Cenit.”

 

The operation of our pipelines follows international standards and industry practices, such as remote operation, integral management, automatic ticket transfer, health, safety and environmental policies and a high customer satisfaction index.

 

The following table sets forth our main pipelines and the main pipelines in which we own an interest by name, kilometers covered, type of product transported, origin, destination and our ownership percentage as of December 31, 2012.

 

Pipeline   Kilometers     Capacity
Thousand
bpd
    Product
Transported
  Origin   Destination   Ownership
Percentage
 
                               
Caño Limón-Coveñas     770.6       220     Crude Oil   Caño Limón   Coveñas     100.00 %
Oleoducto del Alto Magdalena (OAM)     396.5       110     Crude Oil   Tenay   Vasconia     85.12 %
Oleoducto de Colombia (ODC)     480.8       205     Crude Oil   Vasconia   Coveñas     73.00 %
Oleoducto Central (Ocensa)     834.5       590     Crude Oil   Cupiagua   Coveñas     72.65 %
Oleoducto Transandino     306.9       48     Crude Oil   Southern fields   Tumaco Port     100.00 %
Oleoducto de los Llanos (ODL)     262.0       340     Crude Oil   East fields   Monterrey Cusiana     65.00 %
Oleoducto Bicentenario de Colombia S.A.S.     230.0 (1)     240 (2)   Crude Oil   Araguaney   Banadia     55.97 %

 

 

(1) Represents the estimated length of phase 1 of the project and connects the Araguaney and Banadia stations, expected to be operational in 2013.
(2) Represents the crude oil transportation capacity once the project starts its operation.

 

Oleoducto Bicentenario is in the first phase of construction of the Araguaney-Coveñas pipeline, which connects the Araguaney and Banadía loading facilities, and which is expected to be the largest of its kind in Colombia. Its estimated investment of US$2,035 million is expected to be financed by the project partners’ equity participation amounting to a 30% interest and the remaining 70% through loans from local banks, which have approved Ps$2.1 trillion and of which Ps$1,295 billion (approximately US$732 million) has been drawn. The loan’s financial terms include an interest rate of DTF + 4.54% (DTF refers to the fixed term deposit rate), and a term of 12 years with a one-year grace period.

 

The first phase of the construction is expected to permit the evacuation of at least 110 thousand bpd, with a pipeline of 230 kilometers in length and a diameter of 42 inches, connecting Araguaney to Banadía. Delays in the completion of the first phase of this project due in part to events such as lockouts from communities in the areas of project construction demanding more social investment from the government, security issues, attacks by guerrilla groups, and unfavorable weather conditions could affect our production in certain fields and would prevent us from having the necessary infrastructure for crude oil transportation. During 2012, we completed the construction of 60.8% of the first phase and expect to complete this phase in third quarter of 2013.

 

In addition to the construction of the first phase of the Araguaney – Banadía pipeline, we adapted the Araguaney and Banadía stations, which by 2012 were 55% and 47% completed, respectively, and the enlargement of the Coveñas station which was 43% completed in 2012. The next phases of the Oleoducto Bicentenario are awaiting internal approvals from shareholders and obtaining environmental licenses from governmental authorities.

   

54
 

 

The table below sets forth the volumes of crude oil and refined products transported through the crude oil pipelines and multipurpose pipelines owned by us.

 

    For the year ended December 31,  
    2012     2011     2010  
    (thousand bpd)  
Crude oil transport     916.2       915.6       770.9  
Refined products transport     302.7       288.9       264.9  
Total     1,218.9       1,204.5       1,035.8  

 

At December 31, 2012, we owned 53 stations, 21 of them located in crude oil pipelines, 23 of them in refined products pipelines and nine in the ports and riversides (not including those associated with the transportation network that belong to third parties and are operated by us). In addition, we have a nominal storage capacity associated with the transportation network of 19 million barrels of crude oil and 6 million barrels of refined products. We also sell storage capacity to third parties in our Pozos Colorados and Mansilla facilities and in the Coveñas port. We do not own any tankers.

 

Theft of Hydrocarbons

 

In 2012, we achieved significant reductions in the theft of hydrocarbons. We believe the results in controlling the theft of both crude oil and refined oil are evidence of the effectiveness of a structured strategy and strong teamwork. This effort has been recognized by third parties such as Accenture, which gave Ecopetrol its Innovation Award in 2012, and other governments which have shown interest in implementing our strategies in their own infrastructure of hydrocarbons transportation. Theft of refined products, which reached a peak of 7,270 bpd in 2002, was reduced to 23.9 bpd in 2012 mainly due to the efforts in the detection of illicit valves, the development of technologies and cooperation with the Colombian Army and law enforcement agencies. In 2012, theft of refined products was reduced by 70%, from 81 bpd to 23.9 bpd when compared to 2011. The theft of crude oil decreased from 419 bpd in 2011 to 413 bpd in 2012, mainly due to our cooperation with the Colombian Army and local communities.

 

Other Transportation Facilities

 

We have entered into transportation agreements with tanker-truck and barge companies in order to transport crude oil from locations that do not have pipeline connections to refineries and export facilities. The volume of refined products that cannot be transported in pipelines or in tanker trucks because of capacity limitation is transported by barges. During 2012, 37.8 million barrels of crude oil and refined products were transported by tanker trucks and 7.4 million barrels of crude oil and refined products were transported by barges.

 

Export and Import Facilities

 

We currently have concessions granted by the Nation for four export docks for crude oil and refined products (Pozos Colorados, Coveñas, Tumaco and Buenaventura). Our export capacity reached 1,456 million bpd for crude oil and 1,027 million bpd for refined products. Our import capacity reached 1,223 million bpd.

 

Our crude oil loading facilities can load tankers of up to 350 thousand deadweight tonnage, or DWT. Adjacent to these loading facilities we also have crude oil storage facilities that are capable of storing 7.5 million barrels. Our docks used for import and export of refined products can load tankers of up to 85 thousand DWT. Additionally, these facilities have storage capacity of up to 1.2 million barrels.

 

New Transportation Projects

 

Projects to Increase Transportation Capacity

 

During 2012, we increased capacity in our primary and secondary oil pipelines, loading facilities, refined products and gas pipelines due to several projects carried out by the Vice-Presidency of Transportation and Logistics.

 

The nominal capacity of the main systems was increased as follows: our main oil pipeline systems increased from 1,109.5 thousand bpd in 2011 to 1,200 thousand bpd in 2012; and our main refined-products pipeline systems increased from 423.4 thousand bpd in 2011 to 426 thousand bpd in 2012, attributable to the increase in capacity of the Pozos Colorados – Galán line that offset the decrease in the capacity of the 16” Galán – Sebastopol line.

 

55
 

 

Main Accomplishments

 

Primary Oil Pipeline Network:

 

· Increase of 12 thousand bdp in the nominal capacity of the Vasconia – GRB – Galan system, from 168 to 180 thousand bpd.

 

· Increase of 12 thousand bpd in the nominal capacity of the Transandino Oil Pipeline, from 48 to 60 thousand bpd.

 

· Increase of 14.5 thousand bpd in the nominal capacity of the 16” Ayacucho – Coveñas corridor, from 60.5 to 75 thousand bpd.

 

Secondary-Oil Pipelines:

 

· Increase in pumping capacity from 36 to 54 thousand bpd in the 12” Monterrey – Porvenir System.

 

· Start of operations of the 14” Galán – Ayacucho line to evacuate the oil production from La Cira and Isla VI camps. Increase of 19 thousand bpd, from 16 thousand bpd to 35 thousand bpd.

 

Loading Facilities:

 

· Increase from 20 to 30 thousand bpd in the capacity of the oil loading facility in Castilla

 

Refined Pipeline Network:

 

· Transportation of 40 thousand bpd from Apiay to the production fields located in Acacías, Chichimene and Castilla.

 

· Increase of 15 thousand bpd in the capacity of the Pozos Colorados – Galán system, from 90 to 105 thousand bpd .

 

Gas Pipelines:

 

· Beginning of operations of the Cupiagua – Cusiana gas pipeline to 1.1 bcfd in November

 

Storage Capacity:

 

· The beginning of operations of the tanks TK 142 with a restored capacity of 56 thousand barrels in the Puerto Salgar station, as well as the 50 thousand-barrel tank 403 in the Apiay station concluded their maintenance activities with no impact on the nominal capacity.

 

· Beginning of operations of the pumping and storage station Ayacucho II to increase the capacity and reliability in the diluent transportation and refined products in the Pozos Colorados – Galán system, reaching a capacity of 300 thousand barrels.

 

New Business Developments

 

Throughout the transportation-capacity bidding rounds held in 2012, contracts with CEPSA and Petrominerales Colombia Limited were executed for the Santiago – El Porvenir oil pipeline, and with Mansarovar Energy Colombia for the Galán – Ayacucho – Coveñas oil pipeline.

 

In addition, a “ship or pay” and “ship and pay” capacity deal was signed with Occidental Petroleum de Colombia for the Galán – Ayachucho – Coveñas system, as well as a capacity deal for the Araguaney – Porvenir system with Equion.

 

In connection with crude loading, “ship or pay” contracts were signed for the loading facility in Araguaney with Petrominerales and Metapetroleum, along with capacity contracts with Metapetroleum Corp in Colombia and Petrominerales.

 

56
 

 

Incidents at Transportation Facilities

 

Salgar-Cartago Multipurpose Pipeline Spill

 

On December 23, 2011 our Salgar-Cartago pipeline ruptured. The experts believe this incident occurred as a result of creep movement caused by severe weather conditions in the area, causing the surrounding soil to exercise strong pressure on the pipeline and rupturing it. Due to the rupture, approximately 59,976 U.S. gallons of gasoline spilled into the surrounding area in La Divisa and Villa Carola in the Municipality of Dosquebradas, Risaralda. The spilled gasoline from the pipeline subsequently came into contact with a heat source which ignited it, causing several explosions that tragically resulted in 33 fatalities and 35 injuries, as well as damages to the neighboring houses and buildings.

 

In connection with this incident, the Corporación Autónoma Regional de Risaralda, or CARDER (the Regional Environmental Authority for the Department of Risaralda), initiated a proceeding against Ecopetrol for alleged violation of the environmental regulation. In addition, the National Authority on Environmental Licensing – ANLA, has had more detailed involvement in the surveillance of Ecopetrol’s fulfillment of the environmental plan for the area.

 

We performed our own internal investigation of the incident, and additionally hired a local engineering firm as well as a highly renowned international consultant to investigate the causes of the incident. Our internal investigation, the investigation conducted by the Colombian engineering firm and the one conducted by the international consultant, concurred that the origin of the rupture of the pipeline was the result of a creep movement caused by severe weather conditions in the area, causing the surrounding soil to exercise strong pressure on the pipeline

 

Notwithstanding that the causes of such incident cannot be attributed to Ecopetrol, based on objective responsibility criteria established by Colombian Law, and based on principles of solidarity and social responsibility, Ecopetrol agreed to compensate the affected families for their injuries and loses. This compensation does not imply the admission of any guilt as to the incident or the damages caused. For these purposes, Ecopetrol and the affected families agreed on the extrajudicial settlement of the damages and executed conciliation contracts, which were further reviewed and approved by judges in the city of Pereira. Settlements were agreed to cover all injuries and losses for an approximate amount of Ps$12.9 billion.

 

Furthermore, during 2012 and 2013, Ecopetrol has developed several social programs agreed with and for the benefit of the affected communities. These programs have represented as of December 31, 2012 contributions of approximately Ps$12 billion to assist those affected by the incident and to restore the environment and social infrastructure.

 

As of January 4, 2012, we had cleaned the affected water bodies and completed the majority of our remediation activities in connection with the spill. In addition, as of December 31, 2012, we had planted 3,700 trees in the Aguazul Creek basin, in accordance with the guidelines provided by the CARDER.

 

In January 2012, we launched the Dosquebradas Project and have taken the following steps to ensure its continuity:

 

· Health : We have sought to guarantee the physical and mental health of the affected people by making specialized surgery available and delivering the required supplies and drugs.

 

· Legal and Environment - Housing : As of March 18, 2013, we had agreed to settlements with 97% of the families of the deceased persons and the owners of collapsed houses. Also, affected soils including 3.76 km of the Aguazul creek riverside had been recovered.

 

· Social : Activities held with the local community during 2012 included monitoring and comprehensive care of 129 families and the training of 172 community leaders in risk management. Additionally, a school in the Aguazul village was built in record time, and an ecological park to promote health and sports in the Villa Carola Village and a healthcare center were finished, and the Youth Leadership Network was founded.

 

Caño Limon – Coveñas Crude Oil Pipeline Spill

 

Due to natural causes occurring as a result of unusual movement of soil and the tensioning of the pipeline, resulting from severe weather conditions, on December 11, 2011, the Caño Limon - Coveñas oil pipeline ruptured and caused the spill of approximately 3,267 barrels of crude oil into the Iscala creek, which connects with the Pamplonita River that provides water to the city of Cucuta. The incident did not cause any fatalities or injuries.

 

57
 

 

We launched our own internal investigation and hired a highly renowned international consultant to investigate the causes of this incident. The conclusions of the investigations support that the rupture occurred as a result of an unusual movement of soil and the tensioning of the pipeline. We believe investigations will continue for the foreseeable future, and we cannot provide any indication as to their outcome, including whether we will be found liable or subject to enforcement actions.

 

This incident has been subject to investigations by the competent authorities and has originated the filing of an ongoing class action against Ecopetrol and the ongoing proceedings against employees of the company.

 

The Regional Environmental Authority of Norte de Santander, or Corporación Autónoma Regional de la Frontera Nororiental – CORPONOR, has launched an investigation into the causes of the incident and has initiated enforcement actions against us for the alleged wrongful implementation of the contingency plan.

 

The Colombian General Comptroller’s office launched an investigation to determine if this incident might have caused a decrease in the assets of Ecopetrol.

 

At the same time, in 2012, the Colombian General Comptroller’s Office initiated an investigation to determine if there is a fiscal liability of Ecopetrol’s President, the Vice-president of Transportation, and two other employees of the company due to the Caño Limon-Coveñas pipeline spill. The advisors to the employees of Ecopetrol representing them in front of the Colombian General Comptroller’s Office are optimistic regarding the final results of the proceedings; the worst case scenario could eventually imply civil liability of such employees and the risk of termination of their labor contracts.

 

As of the date of this annual report, no judgment or sanction against Ecopetrol or any of its employees has been issued. The different lawsuits and proceedings are being handled by in house lawyers and by the employees’ counselors.

 

The legal counselors’ are optimistic as to the possible results of the proceedings underway, particularly due to the fact that there is technical evidence that the causes of the incident are not imputable to Ecopetrol, and that Ecopetrol took care of the incident in a timely and efficient manner.

 

At the time of the incident, the pipeline was not in operation. We activated the corresponding contingency plan and called for the support of the CREPAD, which is the regional committee for attention and prevention of disasters. Five hundred workers were assigned to the decontamination of the Iscala creek and the Pamplonita River. In addition, the authorities decided to close Cúcuta’s aqueduct gates as a preventive measure, while certified laboratories performed tests to determine its water quality.

 

In order to prevent the occurrence of another incident of this kind, as part of the strengthening of the contingency plans as well as the relationship with its stakeholders, Ecopetrol, national and local authorities are developing a project Ecopetrol has lead for the development of an alternative to the water supply in the intake of the aqueduct in Cúcuta, which project was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors in December 2011. In order to meet this commitment, as of December 31, 2011, we allocated a provision of Ps$67 billion. After basic engineering studies performed during 2012, the provision was updated and set at Ps$189 billion as of December 31, 2012.

 

We paid Ps$9.2 billion in 2012 for the decontamination of the Iscala creek and Pamplonita river and additional remediation activities. In 2011 we paid Ps$17.2 billion for these activities.

 

As of January 4, 2012, we had cleaned the entirety of affected water bodies and the majority of our remediation activities in connection with the product spill were completed. Further analyses conducted by our research institute have shown recovery of the natural resources affected by the incident.

 

We have third-party general liability insurance coverage that applies to damages resulting from incidents such as the ones that occurred in Dosquebradas and Cucuta.

 

Given the uncertainty of the outcome of current investigations and of potential future claims regarding these two incidents, we recorded in our financial statements a provision for future payments and disbursements as if we had been found liable for all damages caused by the incidents. Nevertheless, the provision is only a reasonable estimate of the costs associated with the incident and not a definitive amount. We will continue to review the amount of any necessary accruals, potential asset impairments, or other related expenses and record the charges in the period in which the determination is made and an adjustment is required.

 

58
 

 

Marketing and Supply

 

Summary

 

We market a full range of refined and feed stock products locally including regular and high octane gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel, natural gas and petrochemical products, among others. Local sales of regular gasoline, LPG, jet fuel and diesel fuel as well as natural gas from the Guajira field are subject to government price regulation with reference to international benchmarks.

 

We are the main producer and supplier of refined products in Colombia. For regulated products, the Ministry of Mines and Energy establishes maximum prices producers can charge and retail prices for these products pursuant to resolutions. The Ministry also establishes maximum wholesale and retail margins. For LPG, the Energy and Gas Regulatory Commission establishes maximum prices as well as wholesale and retail margins.

 

Our crude oil export sales are made both in the spot market and through long-term contracts, primarily to refiners in the U.S. Gulf Coast, Far East, Europe and the U.S. West Coast.

 

Purchase Commitments with our Business Partners

 

We have signed a number of crude oil purchase contracts with certain of our business partners and third parties. Crude oil purchased from our business partners is either processed in our refineries or exported. The purchase price is calculated based on international market prices. Consequently, part of our financial exposure depends on the international prices of oil. We believe that the risk of such exposure is naturally hedged since we either export the crude oil at international market prices or sell refined products at prices which are correlated with international market prices. Under most of our existing contracts, the purchases are subject to the pipeline capacity. During 2012, total volumes of crude oil we purchased from our business partners and third parties amounted to 20.2% of our total crude oil volume sales.

 

The term of some of our purchase contracts is linked to the term of the joint venture agreements signed with our business partners. Other clauses of the contracts such as price and place of delivery may be subject to renegotiation during the term of the contract. Certain purchase contracts not linked to joint venture agreements may be extended and renegotiated by the parties.

 

Crude Oil Supply Commitments

 

As part of our transfer of assets to Reficar in April 2007, we extended a commercial offer to Reficar for the supply of crude oil. The commercial offer has been periodically renewed and it is still in effect. Pursuant to the terms of the offer, Reficar has the option to purchase from us up to 200 thousand bpd of crude oil from our Caño Limón, Vasconia Blend, Cusiana and Castilla fields production according to the future requirements for the upgraded refinery. As we continue to operate Reficar, our operations committee evaluates and determines on a monthly basis the refinery’s crude oil mix needs, including the need for foreign crudes which we may import to meet our commitments. The purchase price for the delivered volumes is equal to an international benchmark index, subject to certain adjustments.

 

Import of Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel and Diluents

 

We are reducing sulfur emissions from fuels produced by us through blending with imported ultra-low sulfur diesel. Since January 2010, we supply diesel with sulfur levels under 50 ppm (parts per million) to Bogota, Medellin and other cities around the country that also have bus-based mass-transportation systems, while in the rest of the country, we deliver diesel with sulfur levels under 500 ppm (parts per million). We expect that the quality (sulfur levels) of our diesel will continue improving in 2013 according to international standards. In 2012 we increased imports of ultra-low sulfur diesel by 1,233 bpd compared to 2011 due to rising local demand, depletion of inventory in the country and additional requirements for the production of diesel according to the quality standards of sulfur content effective in 2013. Imports of low sulfur diesel decreased by 1,200 bpd when compared to 2011.

 

Until 2011, we managed gasoline sulfur levels under 1,000 ppm (parts per million) nationwide. Since 2011, we reduced these levels to under 300 ppm (parts per million), an improvement that placed this type of gasoline as one of the grades with the lowest sulfur levels in Latin America.

 

We have also increased imports of naphtha, used as a diluent to allow our heavy crudes to be pumped through pipelines. In 2012, we imported 39.6 thousand bpd of naphtha as compared to 34.8 thousand bpd in 2011.

 

59
 

 

Natural Gas Distribution

 

Summary

 

Development of natural gas reserves began in the 1970s with the discovery of the Guajira fields in the Northeastern region. Additional natural gas reserves were discovered in the Piedemonte Llanero. In Colombia, we have been selling natural gas to local distribution companies, power generators and large customers, and have also been exporting natural gas to Venezuela. In 1986, we introduced a program known as “Natural Gas for Change,” which sought to increase local consumption. In 1993, the Government developed a regulatory framework for the distribution and marketing of natural gas. Between 1995 and 1997, we connected our natural gas production fields with distribution points and major cities. In 1997, we transferred all of our natural gas transportation assets to a newly created company, Empresa Colombiana de Gas, or Ecogas. Ecogas had spun off from us in 1998. Thereafter, Ecogas transferred all of its assets to a new company, incorporated for such purpose, named Transportadora de Gas Internacional S.A. E.S.P., or TGI, formerly, Transportadora de Gas del Interior S.A.E.S.P., which is owned by Empresa de Energía Eléctrica de Bogotá.

 

Marketing of Natural Gas

 

As a result of the growth of natural gas demand from Venezuela and the increase in domestic consumption of gas-powered plants in recent years, the total demand for natural gas, including natural gas exports in 2012 was 1,090 gbtud, representing a 2.6% increase with respect to 1,062 gbtud demanded in 2011. In 2010, demand was 1,061 gbtud while in 2009, demand was 1,035 gbtud.

 

We supplied 614 gbtud in 2012, including for self-consumption, which represents an overall market share of 56.3%.

 

Natural Gas Distribution

 

Currently, there are more than 20 natural gas distribution companies with operations in Colombia.  We sell natural gas to distribution companies through take-or-pay or swing contracts.

 

Compressed Natural Gas

 

Demand for natural gas for vehicles increased by 4.8% between 2012 and 2011, from 73 gbtud to 76.4 gbtud. This increase is mainly due to an increase in the number of compressed natural gas vehicles in response to incentives offered by companies engaged in marketing and delivery of compressed natural gas . According to the latest available report of the Ministry of Energy and Mines, as of December 31, 2012, a total of 402,524 vehicles had been converted to natural gas, an increase of 37,342 vehicles over the total of 365,182 that had been converted in 2011, when 40,667 vehicles were added to the 2010 total of 324,515.

 

During 2012, we amended four of the agreements for the supply of compressed natural gas in the Colombian Atlantic Coast, Bucaramanga, Western region and Bogota in order to maintain the current incentives program that fosters conversions of motor vehicles in these regions from gasoline to natural gas. In addition, we began an early stage of planning and implementation of new incentives programs in the southern part of the country and in the Llanos region.

 

Natural Gas Sales to the Power and Industrial Sector

 

We market and sell natural gas to the industrial sector and to gas-fired and combined cycle power plants. We have a number of long-term supply contracts with power generators under which such companies have entered into take-or-pay contracts and purchase and supply obligations for the supply of natural gas. Currently, we have long-term take-or-pay contracts with three of 14 gas-fired and combined cycle power plants. Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, if we do not ship the contracted natural gas amounts we must pay a fine to our customers. Long-term supply contracts establish a pricing formula that depends on international reference prices.

 

During 2012, Ecopetrol sold 484.2 gbtud in the local market to clients from different sectors such as distributors, industries and power plants. In 2012, as well as in 2011, the lower consumption by power generators allowed the recovery of sales to the industrial sector. This was the opposite of what had occurred in 2010, when sales to the industrial sector dropped, due both to the weather phenomenon known as “El Niño” and to the corresponding higher demand by power plants.

 

60
 

 

The following table sets forth our local deliveries of natural gas including deliveries to our refineries, during 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    For the year ended December 31,  
    2012     2011     2010  
    (gbtud)  
Gas-fired power plants     86.1       95.1       158.8  
Refineries     116.8       112.5       98.5  
Petrochemical     1.6       3.8       3.7  
Industrial (3)     157.0       156.5       67.8  
Distributors (3)     78.1 (1)     101.7 (1)     167.6 (1)
Compressed Natural Gas     39.2       39.5       41.9  
Producers (2)     5.4       36.2       106.5  
Total Deliveries     484.2       545.3       644.8  

 

 

(1) Deliveries to distributors include deliveries to industrial clients that are required to purchase natural gas from distributors.
(2) Between January and September 2010, an increase resulted from higher gas delivery contemplated by our agreement with Chevron.
(3) The difference between 2010 and 2011 figures is explained by our implementation of “Sinergy,” a new nomination software we use to disaggregate sales to distributors by market sector supply. The previous nomination system did not allow this disaggregation.

 

Natural Gas Exports

 

In 2007, we and Chevron entered into a long-term natural gas supply contract with PDVSA through the end of 2011. In December 2011, taking into account that Ecopetrol and Chevron had gas surpluses, we negotiated an extension of exports to PDVSA from January 2012 to June 2014. However, the date of the export contract between Ecopetrol, Chevron and PDVSA  could be extended if, by June 2014 Colombia still has a surplus of natural gas to export to Venezuela.. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we have agreed to deliver the following quantities of natural gas to Venezuela, for which Chevron assumed 43% and Ecopetrol, 57% of the responsibility:

 

    For the year ended December 31,  
   

2012 (2)

   

2013 (2)

   

2014 (2)(3)

 
    (gbtud)  
Volume commitments (1)     127.2       154.8       100  

 

 

(1) The quantities for each month are different, because the volume per year is a weighted average.
(2) Total gas delivery commitment to PDVSA.
(3) The quantity for 2014 is a weighted average from January to June 2014.

 

In 2012, we and our partner Chevron delivered 186.4 gbtud, exceeding the quantity of natural gas we agreed to supply in our gas export contract with PDVSA. In 2011 and 2010, we and Chevron delivered 204.4 gbtud and 154.9 gbtud respectively. Of the total volume of gas delivered in 2012, 70% came from us and 30% came from Chevron.

 

In 2007, we signed a gas import contract in which PDVSA would export gas to Colombia from February 2012 (one month after the date on which the original contract called for an end of exports from Colombia to Venezuela) until December 2027. Given that the export contract described above was extended, the start date of the import contract between Ecopetrol and PDVSA was also changed to September 2014. We have agreed that any change in the date of the end of the export contract will also change date on which the import contract begins.

 

Natural Gas Delivery Commitments

 

In 2011, we participated along with the Commission for Regulation of Energy and Gas in the definition and implementation of new rules for marketing gas in the mid-term. In accordance with the new regulatory framework, we updated our committed natural gas volumes for the years 2012 and 2013.

 

61
 

 

The table below sets forth the commitments we have in firm contracts with local natural gas distribution companies, local industries, gas fired power generators, international companies, including PDVSA in Venezuela, and internal agreements with our refineries and fields.

 

    For the year ended December 31,  
    2012     2013     2014     2015     2016     2017  
    (gbtud)  
Volume Commitments     637       613       353       271       256       257  

 

Pursuant to long-term supply contracts and other agreements, we must supply natural gas to these parties, and failure to deliver the agreed amounts could result in fines under the contracts.

 

In 2012, we paid Ps$9.2 billion, mainly in compensation for non-delivery of natural gas. The fines resulted from delays in the beginning of new projects, mainly the Planta de Gas Cupiagua and the expansion project of the Guajira fields. In 2010, we paid Ps$85.2 billion for non-delivery of natural gas as a consequence of the weather phenomenon known as “El Niño.”

 

In order to meet our natural gas delivery commitments, we have three main natural gas production fields, the Guajira fields, the Cusiana and the Gibraltar fields. Of our total natural gas production at December 31, 2012, 57.1% was supplied by the Guajira production, 22.6% from the Cusiana field and the remaining 20.3% from fields located in other regions. Our participation in the Colombian natural gas market in 2012, including export volumes, was 56.3%, a decrease compared to 2011 and 2010 when the participations stood at 62.0% and 64.5% respectively.

 

Since 2011, Decree 2100 of 2011 issued by the Ministry of Energy and Mines established that all producers have to make a production statement including the volumes available for sales. The following table sets forth the total production statement for 2012-2016 published by the Ministry of Energy and Mines in the fields in which we hold a stake.

 

    For the year ended December 31,  
    2012     2013     2014     2015     2016  
    (gbtud)  
Guajira Fields     684.0       656.0       576.0       475.0       415.0  
Cusiana and Cupiagua Fields     466.1       466.1       466.1       466.1       466.1  
Other Fields     114.5       108.0       101.7       99.7       99.1  
Imports (1)     0.0       0.0       39.0       85.0       127.0  
Total     1,264.6       1,230.1       1,182.8       1,125.8       1,107.2  

 

 

(1) Imports were moved from 2012 to 2014 due to the extension of the export contract with PDVSA.

 

Price Controls on the La Guajira Natural Gas Production

 

The Ministry of Mines and Energy through the Colombian Commission for the Regulation of Energy and Gas, or CREG, establishes the maximum price we are allowed to charge customers that consume less than 100 thousand cfpd from La Guajira field under take-or-pay contracts. Maximum prices we can charge to these “regulated customers” are determined with reference to the average export price for fuel oil for the previous six months.

 

Priorities for Delivery of Natural Gas

 

The Ministry of Mines and Energy established distribution priorities in the event of a shortfall of reserves or production of natural gas. Residential consumers with existing supply contracts, small businesses and distributors of compressed natural gas have the first priority for delivery. Contracts for export of natural gas have the same priority under the firm commitments as other users such as industrial consumers and power generators. The agreements that are not firm commitments and contemplate delivery of natural gas “as available” have priority over customers on the spot market. We may enter into natural gas export contracts if the ratio of reserves to production exceeds seven years.

 

The Ministry of Mines and Energy also establishes distribution priorities in the event of a natural gas shortfall derived from supply or infrastructure issues. This order of priority is based on the type of contract, with firm supply contracts having priority over swing supply contracts.

 

62
 

 

Regulation

 

The main authorities that regulate our activities in Colombia are the Ministry of Mines and Energy, the ANH, the CREG, the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development, and the National Authority on Environmental Licensing.

 

Ministry of Mines and Energy

 

The Ministry of Mines and Energy is responsible for managing and regulating Colombia’s nonrenewable natural resources assuring their optimal use by defining and adopting national policies regarding exploration, production, transportation, refining, distribution and export of minerals and hydrocarbons.

 

National Hydrocarbons Agency – ANH

 

The ANH was created in 2003 and is responsible for the administration of Colombia’s hydrocarbon reserves.  The ANH’s objective is to manage the hydrocarbon reserves owned by the Nation through the design, promotion and negotiation of the exploration and production agreements in areas where hydrocarbons may be found, and not subject to joint ventures executed before December 31, 2003 and still in force, that are directly operated by Ecopetrol. The ANH is also responsible for creating and maintaining attractive conditions for investments in the hydrocarbon sector and for designing bidding rounds for exploration blocks. Decree 4137 of 2011 changed ANH’s legal nature and defined new functions for it.

 

Energy and Gas Regulatory Commission – CREG

 

Laws 142 and 143 of 1994 created the CREG, a special administrative unit of the Ministry of Mines and Energy, responsible for establishing the standards for the exploitation and use of energy, regulating the domestic utilities of electricity and fuel gas (liquefied petroleum gas and natural gas). The CREG is also responsible for fostering the development of the energy services industry, promoting competition and responding to consumer and industry needs. Decree 4130 of 2011 assigns CREG new functions previously fulfilled by the Ministry of Mines and Energy.

 

Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development

 

Formerly the Ministry of Environment, Housing and Territorial Development, the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development was spun off and reorganized by Law 1444 of 2011. It has among its main functions the issuance of public policies regarding the use and exploitation of natural resources and the regulation of national environmental laws.

 

For the oil industry in particular, the ministry defines the procedures structures that regulate the issuance of environmental licenses and permits necessary for the development of the following activities: seismic, when the project includes the construction of roads or highways, production, exploration, extraction, transportation and refining.

 

National Authority on Environmental Licensing

 

Created by Decree 3573 of 2011, the National Authority on Environmental Licensing has among its functions the issuance of licenses and environmental permits required for projects related to oil activities. Additionally, the National Authority on Environmental Licensing constantly monitors license compliance, handles complaints and grievances presented by local communities, and, in general, is in charge of regulating the procedures by which the environmental permits needed for Ecopetrol’s operation are issued and enforced.

 

Control Entities

 

Superintendency of Public Utilities

 

Under Colombian regulations, the distribution and marketing of natural gas is considered a public utility. As such, this activity is regulated by Law 142 of 1994 and supervised by the Superintendency of Public Utilities ( Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios ).

 

Superintendency of Corporations

 

We are subject to the supervision of the Superintendency of Corporations ( Superintendencia de Sociedades ), the governmental body responsible for supervising corporations domiciled in Colombia.

 

63
 

 

Superintendency of Finance

 

The Superintendency of Finance ( Superintendencia Financiera ) is responsible for monitoring, promoting and regulating the publicly traded securities market, registered issuers, broker-dealers, mutual funds and any other participants in the public market including the BVC.

 

We are a registered issuer and our debt and equity securities are publicly traded. The Superintendency of Finance is responsible for the supervision of any activity we undertake that may affect the market for our securities. We are required to inform the Superintendency of Finance of any material event and provide periodic reports of our financial condition.

 

Superintendency of Ports and Transport

 

The Superintendency of Ports and Transport ( Superintendencia de Puertos y Transporte ) has exclusive control and regulates us in matters related to ports concession contracts, in which we act as contractor.

 

National Superintendency of Health Care

 

Because we provide health care benefits to our employees and their families, the National Superintendency of Health Care ( Superintendencia Nacional de Salud ) has exclusive control and regulates us in matters related to the inspection, supervision and control of the Social Security Health Care System.

 

Hydrocarbon Resources Administrator

 

National Hydrocarbons Agency – ANH

 

Any oil company selected by the ANH to explore a specific block must execute an exploration and production contract with the ANH. All royalty payments in connection with the production of hydrocarbons are made to the ANH in-kind unless the ANH grants a specific waiver to make royalty payments in cash. Any oil company working in Colombia, must file with the ANH periodical reports on the development of their exploratory and production activities.

 

Authorities Related to Environmental Matters

 

Regional Autonomous Corporations

 

Regulated by Law 99 of 1993, the Regional Autonomous Corporations are responsible for the administration of natural resources located in their jurisdiction and, although they do not have competency over issues related to the oil industry, they are responsible for granting permission in certain cases to issue permits for natural resources usage, such as water, air or soil necessary for the development of our activities.

 

Ministry of Internal Affairs

 

The Ministry of Internal Affairs is responsible for certifying the existence of ethnic communities (such as Aboriginal, Afro Colombian and “Raizales,” a Colombian legal term that refers to the people born in the San Andrés Island archipelago) in areas in which seismic, exploration, extraction, transportation and refining activities are being developed, and issuing general guidelines which should be developed through consultation procedures necessary for the viability of any work, project or activity intended to be done in the territories of those communities.

 

Regulatory Framework

 

Regulation of Exploration and Production Activities

 

Pursuant to Colombian law, the Nation is the exclusive owner of all hydrocarbon resources located in Colombia and has full authority to determine the rights, royalties or compensation to be paid by investors for the exploration or production of any hydrocarbon reserves. The Ministry of Mines and Energy and the ANH, are the authorities responsible for regulating all activities related to the exploration and production of hydrocarbons in Colombia.

 

64
 

 

Decree Law 1056 of 1953, or the Petroleum Code ( Código de Petróleos ), establishes the general procedures and requirements that must be completed by investors prior to commencing hydrocarbon exploration or production activities. The Petroleum Code sets forth general guidelines, obligations and disclosure procedures that need to be followed during the performance of these activities.

 

Prior to 2003, all activities regarding the exploration and production of hydrocarbons were governed by Decree 2310 of 1974. Consequently, during such period all of our activities were outlined and regulated by this decree. Decree 2310 of 1974 was replaced by Decree Law 1760 of 2003, but all agreements entered into by us prior to 2003 with other oil companies are still regulated by Decree 2310 of 1974.

 

Decree Law 1760 of 2003 created the ANH to regulate and oversee the exploration and production of hydrocarbon reserves; according to its exclusive legal authority, the ANH developed a new contractual regime for hydrocarbons. Decree Law 1760 of 2003 was complemented by Decree 2288 of 2004, which regulates all aspects related to the extension and termination of contracts executed by us before 2004.

 

Accord 008 of 2004 (applicable to agreements entered into by us prior to May 2012) and Accord 004 of 2012 (applicable to agreements entered into by on or after May 2012) issued by the Directive Council of the ANH set forth the necessary steps for entering into exploration and production contracts with the ANH.

 

Resolution 18-1495 of 2009 of the Ministry of Mines and Energy establishes a series of regulations regarding hydrocarbon exploration and production.

 

Pursuant to Colombian law we must pay a percentage of our production to the ANH as royalties. Each production contract has its applicable royalty arrangement in accordance with applicable law. In 1999, a modification to the royalty system established a sliding scale for royalty payments, linking them to the production level of crude oil and natural gas fields discovered after July 29, 1999 and to the quality of the crude oil produced. Since 2002, the royalties system has ranged from 8% for fields producing up to 5 thousand bpd to 25% for fields producing in excess of 600 thousand bpd. Changes in royalty programs only apply to new discoveries and do not alter fields already in their production stage. Producing fields pay royalties in accordance with the applicable royalty law at the time of the discovery. Our contracts specify that royalties are to be paid in kind (oil and gas) to the ANH.

 

We currently purchase all physical products delivered by producers of crude oil as royalty payments to the ANH at prices set forth in Law 756 of 2002 and Resolution 18-1709 of 2003 of the Ministry of Mines and Energy.

 

The purchase price is calculated based on a reference price for crude oil at the wellhead and varies depending on prevailing international prices. We have an interagency collaboration agreement, or “ Convenio de Colaboración, ” with the ANH, whereby we collect all in kind and cash royalties owed to the ANH by the oil companies in Colombia. We also have a purchase agreement to buy all the royalty volume. We sell the physical product purchased from the ANH as part of our ordinary business.

 

Decree 2100 of 2011 modified the commercialization scheme of natural gas royalties. Beginning in June 2012, producers must directly commercialize the royalties of their own production on behalf of the ANH. In return, the ANH pays a commercialization fee to producers.

 

Regulation of Refining and Petrochemical Activities

 

Refining and petrochemical activities are considered a public utility activity and are subject to governmental regulation. Article 58 of the Petroleum Code establishes that oil refining activities can be developed throughout Colombia. Oil refineries must comply with the technical characteristics and requirements established by the existing regulations.

 

The Ministry of Mines and Energy is responsible for regulating, supervising and overseeing all activities related to the refining of crude oil, import of refined products, storage, transport and distribution.

 

Decree 2657 of 1964 regulated the oil refining activities and created the Oil Refining Planning Committee, which is responsible for studying industry problems and implementing short- and long-term refining planning policies. The Committee is also responsible for evaluating and reviewing new refining projects or expansion of existing infrastructure. Prior to deciding on a new project, the Committee must take into account the significance of the project and the economic impact, the sources of financing, profitability, social contribution, the effects on Colombia’s balance of payments and the price structure of the refined products.

 

65
 

 

Pursuant to Resolution 18-0966 of 2006 issued by the Ministry of Mines and Energy and Article 58 of the Petroleum Code, any refining company operating in Colombia must provide a portion or, if needed, the total of its production to supply local demand prior to exporting any production. If the regulated production income, the principal item in the price formula, becomes lower than the export parity price, the price paid for the refined products will be equivalent to the price for those products in the U.S. Gulf Coast market. If there is a need of local demand for imported crudes, the refining company may charge additional transportation costs in proportion to the crudes delivered to the refinery.

 

In 2008, Law 1205 was issued with the main purpose of contributing to a healthier environment, and established the minimum quality that fuels must have in the country and the time frame for compliances. Since August 2010, Ecopetrol has been selling diesel and gasoline that complies with the requirements of the aforementioned law at its refinery in Barrancabermeja.

 

The Ministry of Mines and Energy establishes the safety standards for LPG, storage equipment, maintenance and distribution. Regulations issued in 1992 established that every local, commercial and industrial facility with a storage capacity of LPG greater than 420 pounds must receive an authorization for operations from the Ministry of Mines and Energy.

 

As of May 2012, under the powers granted by Decree 4130 of 2011 for currency and tax matters, the ANH determines the crude oil price reference.

 

Regulation of Transportation Activities

 

Hydrocarbon transportation activity is considered a public utility activity in Colombia and therefore is under governmental supervision and control. Transportation and distribution of crude oil, natural gas and refined products must comply with the Petroleum Code, the Commerce Code ( Código de Comercio ) and with all governmental decrees and resolutions, including Resolutions 181258 and 124386 of 2010 issued by the Ministry of Mines and Energy on Crude Oil Pipeline Transportation, and Resolutions 122 of 2008 and 092 of 2009 issued by the CREG on LPG Pipeline Transportation.

 

Notwithstanding the general rules for hydrocarbon transportation in Colombia, natural gas transportation has specific regulations, due to the categorization of natural gas distribution as a public utility activity under Colombian laws. Therefore, natural gas distribution transportation is governed by specific regulations, issued by the CREG that primarily seeks to satisfy the needs of the population.

 

Transport systems, classified as crude oil pipelines and multipurpose pipelines, can be owned by private parties. The construction, operation and maintenance of pipelines must comply with environmental, social, technical and economic requirements under national and international standards. Transportation networks must follow specific conditions regarding design and specifications, while complying with the quality standards demanded by the oil and gas industry.

 

According to Law 681 of 2001, multipurpose pipelines owned by Ecopetrol (currently by Cenit) must be open to third-party use on the basis of equal access to all.

 

Hydrocarbon transport activity may be developed by third parties and must meet all requirements established by law.

 

The Ministry of Mines and Energy is responsible for:

 

· studying and approving the design and blueprints of all pipelines;

 

· mediation of rates between parties or, in case of disagreement, establishing the hydrocarbon transport rates based on information furnished by the service provider;

 

· issuing hydrocarbon transport regulations;

 

· liquidation, distribution and verification of payment of transport-related taxes; and

 

· managing the information system for the oil product distribution chain.

 

The construction of transportation systems requires government licenses and local permits awarded by the Ministry of the Environment as well as other requirements from regional environmental authorities.

 

66
 

 

Regulation on Selling, Distributing, Transporting and Marketing of Natural Gas

 

The Colombian natural gas market is divided into two types of markets: (1) the regulated price market and (2) the free price market. Decree 2100 of 2011, issued by the Ministry of Mines and Energy, introduced a new regime for the selling and marketing of natural gas in Colombia, including specific procedures that regulate the Colombian market in order to administer the remaining natural gas reserves that the Nation owns, and protect national consumers, especially the residential consumers of natural gas.

 

Decree 2100 of 2011 divided markets in order to regulate marketing procedures as they relate to the production capacity of each production field in Colombia. The producers that operate fields with production capacity of more than 30 million cfpd (“Large Fields”) of natural gas must follow a specific procedure for selling natural gas. The producers that operate fields that produce under 30 million cfpd are free to sell natural gas in terms agreed upon with interested buyers in the Colombian market.

 

Decree 2100 of 2011 distinguished between regulated price fields (Guajira field) and non-regulated price fields with respect to selling procedures for Large Fields. For the Guajira field, Decree 2100 of 2011 determines a specific order to allocate natural gas, prioritizing buyers that would supply residential consumers and small businesses and industry, as well as natural gas transporters. Buyers included in the priority list have the first option to buy natural gas under the conditions offered by the producer. If such buyers choose not to use this option, then the next buyer in the priority list will be awarded that first option to acquire natural gas, until the gas is entirely allocated.

 

For non-regulated price fields, Decree 2100 of 2011 and Resolutions 118 of 2011, 140 of 2011 and 167 of 2011, issued by the CREG, provide a specific procedure to sell natural gas in the Colombian market. The procedure to perform the auction process is completely regulated by the CREG in these Resolutions so that the conditions of the auction are clear to the whole market, setting equal rules and opportunities for the buyers. First, the natural gas producer must publish the available natural gas volumes available for sale. Then, all potential consumers present a supply agreement request. Afterwards, the producer compares the natural gas volume offer with the volumes requested by the potential buyers. If the natural gas demand volumes are higher than the natural gas offer published by the producer, then the producer must perform an auction in order to sell the natural gas that is available. If the natural gas demand volumes are lower than the natural gas offer published by the producer, then the producer is able to directly negotiate the terms of the agreement with each one of the potential buyers that presented the supply agreement request.

 

CREG’s Resolution 057 of 1996 establishes the rules for the different activities related to the natural gas market. It defines transportation as an independent activity. Therefore, transporters of natural gas are not allowed to (1) perform production, commercialization or distribution activities or (2) participate in companies for which the main purpose is to perform one of these activities. Transporters also cannot have an economic interest in electricity generating companies.  The CREG also regulates certain aspects of the agreements that can be used for the marketing, production, distribution and transportation of natural gas. CREG’s Resolutions 118 of 2011, 140 of 2011 and 167 of 2011, as amended, provide four types of contracts that can be used:

 

· Take-or-Pay Agreements. The buyer agrees to purchase a specific amount or percentage of production of natural gas and the producer guarantees the availability of 100% of the agreed amount. If the buyer does not consume the agreed natural gas volume, the buyer still must pay the producer the agreed price.

 

· Optional Purchase Agreements. The buyer agrees to pay a premium for its right to take a fixed amount of natural gas if certain previously agreed conditions are met, and then the buyer agrees to pay an exercise price for the amount of natural gas effectively delivered. The producer guarantees to maintain available 100% of the natural gas agreed volume.

 

· Interruptible Supply Agreements. The parties determine on a daily basis if the quantity of natural gas specified in the agreement is requested and will be supplied.

 

· Conditional Firm Supply Agreements. The seller must supply every day the agreed natural gas volumes unless certain previous agreed conditions take place. Then, the producer is able to interrupt the natural gas supply. If the producer supplies natural gas, the buyer must pay a fixed price.

 

The export of natural gas is not considered a public utility activity under Colombian law and therefore is not subject to Law 142 of 1994. Nevertheless, the internal supply of natural gas is a priority for the Colombian government. This policy is included in Decree 2100 of 2011, providing that in the event the supply of natural gas is reduced or halted as a result of a shortage of this hydrocarbon, the Colombian government has the right to suspend the supply of natural gas to foreign customers. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Decree 2100 of 2011 establishes freedom to export natural gas, under normal conditions for gas reserves.

 

67
 

 

Regulation of Selling, Distributing, Transporting and Marketing of Liquefied Petroleum gas (LPG)

 

Wholesale marketing, transport, distribution and retail marketing of LPG are mainly regulated by Resolution CREG 74 of 1996, and subsequent resolutions. LPG in Colombia is primarily obtained from our refineries, field production and our own imports. The LPG must meet minimum quality standards to be marketed. Our wholesale marketing and transport activities are regulated by Resolutions 53 of 2011 and 92 of 2009. LPG price is regulated by Resolutions CREG 66 of 2007 and CREG 59 of 2008.

 

Regulation of Sales of Liquid Fuels

 

According to section 212 of the Petroleum Code and Law 39 of 1987, distribution of liquid fuels and their derivatives is considered a public utility activity. Consequently, individuals or entities that engage in these activities are subject to regulations issued by the government in the interest of Colombian citizens. The government has the power to determine quality standards, measurement and control of liquid fuels, and establish penalties that may apply to dealers who do not observe such rules.

 

The Ministry of Mines and Energy is the entity that controls and exercises technical supervision over the distribution of liquid fuels derived from petroleum, including the refining, importing, storage, transport and distribution in the country. Law 812 of 2003 identified the agents of the supply chain of petroleum-derived liquid fuels.

 

The distribution of liquid fuels, except LPG, is regulated by Decree 4299 of 2005, as modified by Decrees 1333 and 1717 of 2007 and 2008, respectively, which establish the requirements, obligations and penalties applicable to supply agents in the distribution, refining, import, storage, wholesale, transport, retail sale and consumption of liquid fuels.

 

Decrees 283 of 1990 and 1521 of 1998, and their modifications, establish minimum technical requirements for the construction of storage plants and service stations. The Decrees also regulate the distribution of liquid fuels, establishing the minimum requirements for distributors and the activities and types of agreements permitted for these agents. The Ministry of Mines and Energy also regulates the types of liquid fuels that can be sold and purchased and the penalties for noncompliance with governmental regulations.

 

As of May 2012, the CREG determines the prices for regulated crude oil by-products, except for gasoline, diesel and biofuels (all of which are determined by the Ministry of Mines and Energy).  The ANH determines the price for crude oil corresponding to royalty payments. Jet fuel prices are determined according to Law 1450 of 2011.

 

The distribution of fuels in areas near Colombian borders is subject to specific regulations that impose stringent control procedures and requirements. Currently, Ecopetrol is no longer responsible for fuel distribution in these areas. That responsibility was transferred to the Ministry of Mines and Energy, pursuant to Law 1430 of 2010.

 

Regulation of Biofuel and Related Activities

 

The sale and distribution of biofuels is regulated by the Ministry of Mines and Energy. Regulations establish the quality and pricing standards for biofuels and impose minimum requirements for mixing ethanol with gasoline and biodiesel with diesel.

 

Environmental Matters

 

Regulation

 

The Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development is the highest environmental authority in Colombia and is in charge of issuing nationwide environmental regulations, policies, and programs. At the regional local level, regional environmental authorities, such as the Regional Autonomous Corporations (Corporaciones Autónomas Regionales) , are the highest environmental authorities of the region and are in charge of executing and overseeing the enforcement of all regulations, policies and programs issued by the Ministry of Environment within their area of jurisdiction, related to the environment and renewable natural resources, as well as overseeing any activity from a sustainable development perspective.

 

68
 

 

Law 99 of 1993 and other environmental regulations impose on companies in general, including oil and gas companies, the obligation to obtain an environmental license prior to undertaking any activity that could negatively impact the environment, or produce serious damage to the environment and natural renewable resources. The National Authority on Environmental Licensing, created by Decree 3573 of 2011, is responsible for evaluating license applications and overseeing all hydrocarbons projects and monitoring compliance.

 

If projects or activities may impact indigenous, afro-colombian and “raizal” communities, the Colombian constitution provides that the companies developing such projects or activities must consult with those communities before initiating the project or activities or the environmental licensing process. Further, along with this process, the communities or the public oversight entities can request that a public hearing take place for this purpose. In addition, the Colombian constitution and laws establish that in order to comply with public participation mechanisms, the communities may demand information regarding the activities of the project and the impacts it could have.

 

The environmental licensing process begins when the company filing an environmental plan with the National Authority on Environmental Licensing. Such licensing includes, but is not limited to, the application for the use of natural renewable resources (water, soil and air), the filing of an environmental impact assessment, and a plan to prevent, mitigate, correct and compensate for any activity that may harm the environment. According to recently issued regulations, obtaining a license may take between 165 and 265 business days, depending on whether the authority requires the applicant to file additional information or if it is necessary to establish a governmental committee to decide on the viability of the project.

 

The Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development is also responsible for establishing guidelines regarding climate change policies for the hydrocarbon sector in Colombia. We are in compliance with those guidelines. At present, the Ministry of Environment has not proposed any specific steps for the implementation of the Kyoto Accords as it relates to our operations. We are continuously monitoring climate change requirements that could be applicable to us.

 

A company that does not comply with applicable environmental law and regulations, does not execute the environmental plan approved by the environmental authority or that ignores the requirements imposed by an environmental license may be subject to an administrative proceeding initiated by the National Authority on Environmental Licensing or the regional environmental authorities established by Law 1333 of 2009. The proceeding may result in oral or written warnings, monetary penalties fines, license revocation or even temporary or permanent suspension of the activity being undertaken.

 

As of March 2013, we were party to 147 environmental administrative proceedings, of which 110 were initiated before 2012, 30 during 2012 and seven during the first three months of 2013. During 2012, ten proceedings were concluded, for which we were subject to monetary fines. The largest fine imposed in 2011 amounted to Ps$3.427 million (approximately US$1.9 million), after being reduced by the authority after being appealed by the Company. As of December 31, 2012, we were subject to four monetary fines that are not yet finally decided, amounting to Ps$616.621 million (approximately US$344,000). It is not possible for us to determine the material effect of the pending proceedings.

 

Environmental Practices

 

During 2012, we reviewed and adjusted the focus of our environmental management strategy in order to ensure environmental sustainability, taking into account the challenges we face in complying with environmental regulatory requirements related to larger, international commitments and the expectations of our stakeholders. Our environmental strategy has four action fronts: environmental feasibility, operational excellence, environmental water management and proactive environmental management. During 2012, we invested Ps$1,161 million in environmental programs to strengthen environmental management and increase environmental compliance. These investments include those made through contracts with our business partners in the amount of Ps$113,607 million. Such programs include:

 

· Compliance . The purpose of this program is to guarantee knowledge, assessment, disclosure and compliance with all laws, regulations and requirements imposed by the Ministry of Environment and other regulatory bodies. We undertake environmental impact assessments and constantly review our environmental plan.

 

· Contingency Planning . This program focuses on implementing preventive actions in our operative and administrative areas in order to diminish the impact of oil and hydrocarbon spills, illness, personal and other operational problems and establish the steps that need to be followed in case of an emergency.

 

69
 

 

· Eco-Efficiency . This program is designed to minimize the environmental impacts resulting from our (1) use of natural resources through activities such as water uptake and forest exploitation and (2) waste generation through liquid emissions and the creation of hazardous waste. In 2012, we developed two testing projects designed to identify areas that could reduce our use of natural resources and waste generation. Among the alternatives identified to enhance operational efficiency, we are reducing fresh water consumption for the production camps of the Castilla and Chichimene fields. We have also identified opportunities to reduce consumption and emissions of waste water at transportation facilities and are striving to apply a zero liquid discharge plan.

 

· Biodiversity . This program implements initiatives to preserve endangered species and ecosystems in areas where our activities have strong influence. In 2012, we invested Ps$4.6 billion to develop the “Environmental Planning for the Biodiversity Conservation in Ecopetrol Areas of Influence” project with the National Institute of Biodiversity.

 

· Environmental Culture . This program seeks to promote an environmental culture in our organization, activities, and daily life. We initiated several environmental campaigns to educate our workforce in areas such as occupational health and friendly environmental practices.

 

· Climate Change. We have designed a climate change strategy to guide, plan, define and execute our actions towards mitigating the effects of climate change and our participation in the elaboration of local and international climate change policies. In this context, we have entered into technical cooperation agreements with different parties, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, under the Global Methane Initiative, and the Petroleum Technology Alliance of Canada, or PTAC under the energy efficiency program. During 2012, we made progress with our climate change mitigation strategy. We implemented 13 projects, which sought a reduction of 280,257 tons of CO 2 in one year. Our project portfolio comprises emission reduction initiatives and compensation activities for forest conservation and restoration. .

 

· Alternative Energy Sources. This program is designed to develop alternative energy sources, such as biodiesel and ethanol projects. In June 2010, the biodiesel production plant (operated by Ecodiesel) began operations with a capacity of producing 2 thousand bpd. Biodiesel is obtained from refining crude palm oil. The plant has produced a total of 1,795,915 barrels of biodiesel since it began operations. In 2012, the plant produced 804,133 barrels, compared to 718,149 barrels in 2011 and 273,625 barrels in 2010. Additionally, we own 91.43% of Bioenergy S.A., a company established in Colombia, with a production capacity of 2,640 bpd. In 2011, Bioenergy S.A. began the construction of its plant, while its sugarcane plantation has been developed and covers 5,514 hectares of 14,400 hectares projected. The plant is expected to begin operations during the second half of 2013.

 

We have also been undertaking significant efforts to make an efficient and rational use of the energy resources we use in our production processes, reducing consumption, costs and CO 2 emissions. In line with the 2012 update of our Strategic Plan, energy issues have taken special relevance. These include energy use, which encompasses the concept of integral energy solutions focused on efficiency, reliability and optimization, and the concept of energy diversification. Our 2012 energy efficiency audit was completed for our buildings located in the city of Bogota. The approximate energy savings totaled 497,000 kwh per year, equivalent to US$65 million and 145 tons of CO 2 per year. Additionally, we undertook feasibility studies of potential pipeline energy recovery at our pumping stations in Vasconia and La Belleza. We expect the results of these studies by the first quarter of 2013.

 

In line with our initiatives to diversify the energy resources we use, we began two studies during 2011 on the use of water, solar and eolic resources.. The first one, regarding Small Hydraulic Plants ( PCH – Pequeñas Centrales Hidráulicas ) attempts to identify water resources with enough generation potential to supply the demand of our operations in the South Region. The second aims to measure 13 operation areas, to determine which of them have adequate conditions to implement applications of solar and eolic resources that could (i) have a positive impact on emissions reduction, (ii) provide energy solutions to reduce consumption and (iii) have economic feasibility.

 

We launched two new projects:  the Termocoa turbine conversion and the electrification of the San Roque - Tisquirama fields, resulting in an energy-consumption reduction of 449 boed, equivalent to US$4.7 million per year. In addition, the following developments associated with our projects in potential pipeline energy recovery, geothermal energy, solar and wind power and hydroelectric plants took place:

 

· Potential Pipeline Energy Recovery: The project is currently under survey and analysis. It is expected that our analyses of energy-use optimization, carbon footprint reduction, and system-reliability improvement analysis in the Vasconia pumping station will conclude by April 2013.

 

70
 

 

· Geothermal energy:  Our geothermal energy project is currently undergoing a corporate strategic alignment.  We expect a framework for this initiative to be available by 2014.

 

· Solar – Wind Energy Potential: We achieved two important goals in 2012. We completed the collection of the relevant information to identify six locations potentially well-suited for the development of solar-energy projects. We also have been conducting measurements in the Teca field to determine its potential for solar and thermal energy. We expect basic engineering for ten projects to be completed by the end of 2013.

 

· Small Hydroelectric Plant (SHP): We have developed two studies in the southern region of Colombia in order to determine the economic and technical feasibility of pursuing hydroelectric projects near identified water resources.

 

In the case of an oil spill or leak from our operations, we must follow contingency plans in accordance with internal guidelines and procedures designed in line with our health, safety and environment, or HSE, programs in compliance with best practices to prevent oil spill events from happening and to mitigate the environmental impact. In addition, we must comply with Colombian Regulation Decree 321 of 1999 and the National Contingency Plan, which are a set of guidelines that must be followed by oil and gas companies in Colombia to prevent, and react in case of, operational events that could impact the environment. For offshore joint ventures, the operator partner has the responsibility of designing and implementing remediation plans and procedures to deal with operational emergencies in accordance with best practices and local environmental regulations. Despite the fact that in the case of an emergency the operator partner is the one responsible for the remediation plan, we will also activate our own contingency plan and act along with the operator. We acted according to our contingency plans with respect to the oil spills occurring in the Salgar-Cartago and the Caño Limón-Coveñas pipelines. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Transportation Infrastructure—Incidents at Transportation Facilities.”

 

Health, Safety and the Environment

 

We are devoted to improving our HSE, practices. We have several programs in place to increase our industrial and process safety, minimize the number of accidents of our workforce or our contractors and minimize catastrophic incidents. The frequency of accidents taking place within our premises has declined significantly to 0.8 accidents per million of hours worked in 2012 from 5.77 accidents per million of hours worked in 2005. Additionally, since 2009 we are working on a “Process Safety Management” system aimed at the continuous improvement and minimization of operational incidents, such as fire, explosion, loss of primary containment and multiple fatalities. We also employ Technological Risk Analysis and a System of Command Incidents (SCI) and continue the process of standardization of HSE protocols and procedures, drafting safety manuals, compliance with existing regulations and the study of HSE benchmarks among oil companies. Our HSE programs are comprised of the following six pillars: (1) culture and leadership, (2) HSE competences in our employees and contractors, (3) safe design, (4) safe operation, (5) prevention and response to emergencies and (6) performance and audits. We have established guidelines to develop these pillars.

 

In the area of occupational health, our goal is to ensure a healthy workplace for all of our employees. We have defined five main programs in our organization: epidemiology surveillance, ergonomic risk management, industrial hygiene program, industrial health program and medical emergency response. These programs help to control the risks of our daily operations, identified through a health risk assessment. Our goal is to have healthy workers, preventing occupational illness, preserving and maintaining individual and collective health of workers in their occupations inside a safe work environment.

 

In 2012, we recorded 27 environmental incidents, and 41 were recorded in 2011, the same number as in 2010. Oil spills increased from 2,599 barrels in 2011 to 4,050 barrels in 2012. This increase was primarily due to a single incident a fuel spill in the Sebastopol Galán pipeline of 3,323 barrels.

 

Human Rights Initiatives

 

We have a strong commitment to the protection of human rights in the areas where we operate and use a set of security and human rights principles, or Principios Voluntarios en Seguridad y Derechos Humanos , as a basis for the risk analysis of our Company in the communities where we operate. We use this set of principles to interact with local communities and strengthen their relationship with local authorities, our third party contractors and us. In particular, under the Colombian Constitution and legal framework, we are required to enter into formal consultations with indigenous communities whenever we are making plans to commence projects or operations in lands under their control.

 

71
 

 

In addition, as part of our commitment to human rights, in 2009, we approved our Human Rights Policy and joined the United Nations Global Compact. To manage and ensure compliance with the policy and principles of the United Nations Global Compact, in 2010, we created the following forums and tools:

 

· Human Rights Committee;

 

· Tactical Plan on Human Rights; and

 

· Compliance Indicator for Corporate Human Rights Program.

 

In 2012, to manage and ensure compliance with both our Human Rights Policy/Tactical Plan on Human Rights and the principles of the United Nations Global Compact, we implemented the actions provided within the Tactical Plan on Human Rights. The Tactical Plan on Human Rights revolves around six components:

 

· right of association and collective bargaining;

 

· right to equality at work;

 

· human rights complaint, reporting and claims system;

 

· rights of ethnic groups;

 

· children’s rights; and

 

· human rights and security.

 

Among our most outstanding activities in 2012, we conducted an analysis of human rights risks associated with the development of the different phases of our operating lines, with emphasis on projects in the Meta, Casanare and Magdalena Medio departments. This work is planned to continue in 2013 with the formulation of a plan for human rights risk management within the broader risk management plan of the Company.

 

Additionally, in 2012, we designed a process to monitor risks and the human rights impact of our operations and value chain. We identified the various sources of information that will support the identification of specific cases of alleged human rights violations in the future and trends in the perceptions of our stakeholders regarding our performance in the area of human rights.

 

Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI)

 

In 2012, we continued to be listed on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index - World. This index tracks the financial performance of the leading sustainability-driven companies worldwide and is a reference used to assess corporate sustainability.

 

Insurance

 

We have a clear and defined corporate policy based on risk financing guidelines that summarizes the Company’s risk transference and retention alternatives and provides support and guidance for all the insurance-related issues of all of our affiliated and subsidiary companies.

 

There are two corporate insurance programs according to our core business operations, insured values, limits and other aspects.

 

In the text and tables below, we set forth our insurance programs and the companies covered, along with limits and coverage details.

 

World-Wide Umbrella Program . This insurance program provides coverage for downstream (assets and operations) of Ecopetrol and all of its affiliates and subsidiaries in excess of their local insurance programs, and also in excess of the “Global Energy Package” program, when applicable. Coverage includes all physical damage, sabotage and terrorism, general liability, directors and officers, crime and marine cargo.

 

72
 

 

    Limit (eel/agg (1) )     Deductible                                                        
Policies   Onshore     Offshore     Onshore     Offshore     Ecopetrol                 Ecoeptrol                                
    (US$ in millions)     Downstream     Reficar     Propilco     Upstream     Equion     Hocol     America     Brazil     Peru  
Property all risk     2,000       0       5 - 10       N/A       X       X       X                                      
Sabotage and terrorism     600       0       0.5       N/A       X       X       X                                                  
Third Party Liability     500               1 - 5               X       X       X       X       X       X       X       X       X  
Crime     50               Various               X       X       X       X       X       X       X       X       X  
Directors and Officers     250               Various               X       X       X                                                  
Cargo     100               3% dispatch               X       X               X                                          

 

 

(1) Eel: each and every loss. Agg: Aggregate

 

Global Energy Package This program provides coverage for upstream and midstream (assets and operations) of Ecopetrol’s interests and all of its upstream affiliate and subsidiary companies, including all physical damage, sabotage and terrorism, general liability and control of wells.

 

    Limit (eel/agg (1) )     Deductible                                                  
Policies   Onshore     Offshore     Onshore     Offshore     Ecopetrol                 Ecopterol                          
    (US$ in millions)     Downstream     Reficar     Propilco     Upstream     Equion     Hocol     America     Brazil  
Third Party Liability     0       100       N/A       0.15                         X                   X       X  
Sabotage and terrorism     50       0       0.5       N/A                               X       X       X                  
Control of wells     25       400       0.25 - 0.50       5                               X       X       X       X       X  
Property All Risk     400     0.25                                       X       X       X       X          

 

 

(1) Eel: each and every loss. Agg: Aggregate

 

Our third-party liability insurance policies cover Ecopetrol, our subsidiaries and affiliates in excess of local underlying policy limits for claims made against them by third parties.  Our commercial general liability, umbrella liability, and excess liability coverages will pay on behalf of or indemnify amounts for which an insured becomes legally obligated to pay, including damages in respect of bodily injury, property, pollution and product liability.  Coverage of bodily injury and property damage is subject to a coverage territory during the policy period.

 

We do not currently act as an operator in any offshore production operation, although we are involved in certain offshore joint ventures in Colombia, the U.S. Gulf Coast and Brazil, and have exploration operations offshore of the Colombian Caribbean coast, which are operated by Equion. In Colombia, currently offshore production operations are carried out by Chevron. There are two platforms that produce liquefied petroleum gas. The World Wide Umbrella and Global Energy Package programs cover all of our interests.

 

With respect to offshore operations in the U.S. Gulf Coast, Ecopetrol America Inc. is party to Operating Agreements, or OA, that include customary conditions and which contain similar terms and provisions to those in the Model Form of Offshore Deepwater Operating Agreement of the American Association of Professional Landmen (AAPL). In general, pursuant to these OAs, the obligations, duties, and liabilities of the contract parties are several, and not joint or collective, for all operations covered by the OAs. Liability for losses, damages, costs, expenses, or claims involving activities or operations under the OAs which are not covered by or in excess of the insurance carried for the joint account are borne by each contract party in proportion to its participating interest in the activity or operation out of which that liability arises, except when any damages result from a party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct, in which case, such party is solely liable for such damages. The operators supervise the handling, conduct, and prosecution of all claims involving activities or operations under the respective OA or affecting the leases or the contract area covered thereunder. Finally, operators must obtain insurance as required by the OA which costs are charged to the joint account and must have HSE practices in place and comply with locally applicable HSE related statutory requirements.

 

Ecopetrol Oleo e Gas do Brasil Ltd. and Ecopetrol del Perú are parties to Joint Operating Agreements (JOA) based on the Association of International Petroleum Negotiators (AIPN), model.  Liability is generally the same as described for the OA above, with the following variations:  if claims arise from third parties as part of a claim not involving an operator’s gross negligence or willful misconduct, and the operator pays such claims, all parties must concur and reimburse such claim amounts. In certain contracts, all environmental damages are distributed according the parties’ participation interest, regardless of whether the damages were caused by an operator’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. In certain cases, non-operators may intervene and directly verify compliance of the operator’s HSE programs. Ecopetrol use the same liability clauses in JOAs for offshore operations in Colombia, when Colombian laws do not govern such agreements.

 

73
 

 

As part of the corporate policy based on risk financing guidelines, the assets transferred to Cenit are covered by the corresponding corporate insurance programs (World Wide Umbrella Program and Global Energy Package). Pipelines, however, are excluded under the property and terrorism policy coverage as part of a corporate risk determination.

 

Salgar-Cartago and Caño Limon-Coveñas Pipeline Spill Incidents

 

We have a liability policy covering damages to third parties. We gave timely notice of the events of Dosquebradas (Salgar-Cartago pipeline) and Cucuta (Caño Limón-Coveñas pipeline) to our insurance company, which appointed the corresponding loss adjusters. The loss adjusters report concluded that the cause of the incidents were related to slow and imperceptible movements of land that caused the rupture of the pipelines. Since these events were unforeseeable, the report concluded that the incident was caused by a force majeure event, which is expressly excluded from our liability policy. The claim was therefore declined by the insurers.

 

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

 

Under Colombian law, the Nation owns all crude oil and natural gas reserves within Colombia and we have certain rights to explore and produce those reserves in areas awarded by the ANH after public bidding. Most of our property, consisting of refineries and storage, production and transportation facilities, is located in Colombia. Our main assets consist of our wells, refining facilities and our pipelines. See “—Overview by Business Segment—Reserves” for a description of our reserves, sources of crude oil and natural gas, main tangible assets and material plans for expansion and improvements in our facilities. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Use of Funds—Capital expenditures” and “Item 4. Transportation and Logistics.”

 

ITEM 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

 

74
 

 

ITEM 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

 

The following discussion presents our financial results and prospects as well as factors that affect our results of operation under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Effects of Acquisitions

 

Our most significant recent acquisitions are listed below, together with the effective date as of which each has been reflected in our financial statements. These acquisitions were funded mainly through cash on hand and cash flow from our operations.

 

· Offshore International Group Inc., or OIG (February 2009) – 50% ownership. OIG is incorporated in the United States and its main asset is Savía Perú, which carries out offshore exploration and production activities in Peru and has 8.6 million hectares of exploration and production areas. Savía Perú contributed with a gross production of approximately 6 thousand boepd in 2012.

 

· Ocensa (March 2009) – 72.65% ownership. In January 2011, as a result of our acquisition of BP Exploration Company Limited, we indirectly acquired 51% of its interest in Ocensa, increasing our share in the company to 72.65%. With this acquisition we increased our participation in a key crude oil transport system in Colombia, which transports approximately 57.5% of total crude oil production that reaches the Coveñas export facilities. Prior to the acquisition of BP Exploration, in March 2009, we entered into an agreement with Enbridge Inc., a Canadian company, pursuant to which we acquired 100% of its stake in Ocensa, thereby increasing our interest in Ocensa from 35.3% to 60%. During 2012, we used, on average, approximately 76.3% of the total capacity of this system.

 

· Reficar (May 2009) – 100% ownership. After increasing our participation in Reficar, we continue developing the expansion and modernization of the Cartagena refinery. We believe this project will allow us to transform heavy crude oil into more valuable products to improve our profitability.

 

· Hocol Petroleum Limited (May 2009) – 100% ownership. The principal asset is Hocol, which has exploration and production activities in Colombia. This operation contributed to increase our hydrocarbon reserves and production in Colombia. In 2012, Hocol contributed a gross production of 25.1 thousand boepd. On December 27, 2012, Hocol merged with Hocol Limited and Homcol Cayman Inc.

 

· Equion Energía Limited (January 2011) – 51% ownership. BP Exploration Company Limited sold its interests in Colombia, which were acquired by us and Talisman Colombia Holdco Limited. The company was later renamed Equion Energía Limited. During 2012, Equion contributed a production of 10.6 thousand barrels per day of crude oil and 42 million cubic feet per day of natural gas.

 

For more information related to our acquisitions, see “Item 4. Information on the Company.”

 

Factors Affecting our Operating Results

 

Our operating results are affected mainly by international prices of crude oil, refined products and natural gas, sales volumes and product mix. Higher crude oil and natural gas prices have a positive impact on our results of operations in our Exploration and Production segment due to the increase in our revenues from exported volumes. Results from our refining activities are also affected by conversion ratios, utilization rates, refining capacity and operating costs, all of which affect our refining margins. Finally, changes in the value of foreign currencies, particularly the U.S. dollar against the Peso, have a significant effect on our financial statements.

 

Sales Volumes and Prices

 

Our Exploration and Production segment results depend on production levels and average local and international prices for crude oil and natural gas that we market and sell to our customers locally and abroad. Additionally, sales volumes are affected by the purchase of crude oil and natural gas that we make from our business partners and the ANH.

 

75
 

 

We sell crude oil in the international market. In addition, we process crude oil at the Barrancabermeja Refinery and Reficar, and sell refined products in the local and international markets. Currently, production volumes and sale prices of crude oil and refined products are the main drivers of our financial performance, together with marketing, cost reduction and operative performance strategies.

 

Local Sales and Prices

 

We have a number of crude oil and natural gas long-term supply contracts with local customers, including Reficar, gas-fired power plants, local natural gas distribution companies and PDVSA Gas in Venezuela. Local sale prices are determined in accordance with existing regulations, contractual arrangements and the spot market linked to international benchmarks.

 

International Sales and Prices

 

We export crude oil and refined products at prices which are set by reference to international benchmarks. However, we export any crude oil and refined products surplus only after we have fulfilled our supply commitments with our refineries and local customers.

 

Our commercial strategy, which includes market diversification, has led us to countries such as China, India, Singapore and Spain. In addition, we have started to trade some volume out of the Colombian supply chain by purchasing refined products from an international supplier and selling such products to clients in the foreign market. .

 

During the past three years, we have significantly increased our international sales on a “delivered” basis to the Caribbean, Central America, the United States and Asian markets, giving us more flexibility both in operational and commercial terms.

 

Gasoline and Diesel Price Differentials

 

We charge the domestic prices established by the Government to wholesalers and, at the same time, we accrue the amount of any fuel price differential due pursuant to Law 1151 of 2007 as revenues and record an account receivable from the Government.

 

During 2010, refiners were entitled to fuel price differential payments. The payments made by the Ministry of Mines and Energy in 2010 corresponded to the first three quarters of the year. The amount due to us by the Ministry, which included the opportunity cost recognized to compensate the delay on the payments, as of December 31, 2010, amounting to Ps$163.4 billion, was delayed and paid in the fourth quarter of 2011.

 

The fuel price differential payment from the Ministry of Mines and Energy corresponding to the first three quarters of 2011 was paid in December 2011. The fuel price differential payment from the Ministry of Mines and Energy corresponding to the fourth quarter of 2011 was Ps$571.8 billion and for the year ended of 2012 was Ps$1,381.5 billion. In April 2013, the Ministry of Mines and Energy paid the corresponding amounts due to us for the fourth quarter of 2011 and first three quarters of 2012, amounting to Ps$1,271.9 billion. The amount due to us, corresponding to the fourth quarter of 2012 and the first quarter of 2013 is equivalent to Ps$390.3 billion.

 

Exploration Costs

 

We account for exploratory drilling using the successful effort method whereby all costs associated with the exploration and drilling of productive wells are capitalized, while costs incurred in exploring and drilling of dry wells are expensed in the period and accounted for under operating expenses—studies and projects. Consequently, the number of exploratory wells we declared as dry negatively affects our results. As such, the significant expansion of our drilling program, which we are currently undertaking, will likely result in higher dry well expenses and may lead to material changes or volatility in our operating expenses.

 

Royalties

 

We are required by law to pay in kind a percentage of our production (crude oil and natural gas) to the ANH as royalties. Each production contract has its own royalty arrangement. In 1999, a modification to the royalty system established a sliding scale for royalty payments linked to the production level of crude oil and natural gas fields discovered after July 29, 1999 depending on whether the production is crude oil or natural gas, and on the quality of the crude oil produced. Since 2002, the royalties system has ranged from 8% for fields producing up to 5,000 bpd to 25% for fields producing in excess of 600 thousand bpd. Changes in royalty programs only apply to new discoveries and do not alter fields already in their production stage. Producing fields pay royalties in accordance with the applicable royalty program at the time of the discovery.

 

76
 

 

Commercialization of Natural Gas from the ANH

 

Pursuant to Decree 2100 of 2011, we entered into an agreement with the ANH under which we will no longer purchase the natural gas received in kind by the ANH as royalties and instead will commercialize the natural gas of those fields in which the producer does not decide to directly commercialize the royalties. The agreement establishes that we shall sell to third parties on behalf of the ANH the natural gas that belongs to the government between 2012 and 2013. This agreement became effective in July 2012 and reduced the natural gas we purchase from the ANH and sale to third parties by approximately 100 gbtud during 2012.

 

Purchases of Hydrocarbons from the ANH

 

We continue purchasing all crude oil delivered to the ANH by us and from third parties as well as the natural gas from certain fields not covered by the above-mentioned agreement and delivered as royalty payments to the ANH. Prices are set forth in a contract between the ANH and us dated December 28, 2012, and a natural gas offer letter from ANH dated June 17, 2009. For crude oil, the purchase price is calculated according to a formula that includes our exports sales prices (crudes and products), a quality adjustment for API gravity and sulfur content, the transportation rates from the wellhead to the Coveñas and Tumaco ports, the refining process cost and a marketing fee. We sell the physical product purchased from the ANH as part of our ordinary business.

 

Import of Products for Transportation and Blending

 

During 2012, we increased the volume of naphtha imported to 14.5 million barrels from 12.7 million barrels in 2011 for blending with heavy crude oil to ease its transportation through pipeline systems. In addition, in order to meet local environmental regulations regarding sulfur content in diesel, we imported 11.2 million barrels of ultra low sulfur diesel for blending with our local production. Imported diesel volumes were higher than in 2011 due to growth in local demand along with less availability of this product related to scheduled maintenance of the hydrotreating plant in Barrancabermeja. Purchase prices were lower in 2012 (US$8 per barrel) compared to 2011, in line with international trends. Our variable costs are affected by available volumes of these products and their prices, affecting our operating results.

 

Effect of Taxes and Exchange Rate Variation on our Income

 

Income Taxes

 

The Colombian Congress adopted Law 1607 of December 26, 2012, which introduces significant reforms to the Colombian tax system. In particular, the income tax rate was reduced from 33% to 25% starting in 2013 and the Equality Income Tax (Impuesto de Renta para la Equidad - CREE) was created with a rate of 9% from 2013 to 2015 and 8% starting in 2016. There are some differences between the treatment used to determine this tax and the one used to determine ordinary income tax. As a result, as of January 2013 we are subject to tax on our income at a rate of 34%. From 2008 until December 2012 the standard corporate rate in Colombia was 33%.

 

Exchange Rate Variation

 

The appreciation or revaluation of the Peso, particularly against the U.S. dollar, has multiple effects on our financial results. In compliance with Colombian regulations, our results are reported in Pesos, and we maintain our financial records in Pesos. Almost all of our exports of crude oil, natural gas and refined products are sold in U.S. dollars at prices determined by reference to international benchmarks.

 

During 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Peso has appreciated on average 2.7%, 2.6%, and 12.0%, respectively, against the U.S. dollar. When the Peso appreciates against the U.S. dollar, our revenues from exports of crude oil and natural gas are reduced in Pesos. The appreciation of the Peso also results in lower cost of products, services supplied and contracted abroad as these are denominated in U.S. dollars.

 

When the Peso depreciates against the U.S. dollar, our revenues from exports increase when expressed in Pesos. Imported goods, however, including imported services denominated in U.S. dollars, will by the same token increase.

 

77
 

 

Similarly, when we incur in U.S. dollar-denominated debt, a depreciation or appreciation of the Peso in relation to the U.S. dollar, may increase or decrease both our financial expenses and the outstanding value of our indebtedness when expressed in Peso.  During 2010 and 2012, we did not incur any U.S. dollar-denominated debt.  During 2011, we raised US$3,500 million and US$80 million through our subsidiaries Reficar and Propilco, respectively.

 

New Accounting Policies

 

Colombian Government Entity GAAP

 

There were no significant new accounting standards effective in the year 2012 impacting the Company pursuant to Colombian Government Entity GAAP.

 

U.S. GAAP

 

In December, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 Balance Sheet (Topic 210) - Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The amendments in this update require an entity to disclose information about its offsetting of assets and liabilities, as well as related arrangements. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods. Our preliminary analysis indicates that we do not expect these amendments to have any impact due to the fact that we do not have offsetting assets and liabilities.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

The following discussion sets forth our critical accounting policies. Critical accounting policies are those policies that require us to exercise judgment or involve a higher degree of complexity in the application of the accounting policies that currently affect our financial condition and results of operations. The accounting estimates we make in these contexts require us to calculate variables and make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain. In each case, if we had made other estimates, or if changes in the estimates occur from period to period, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially affected. This information should be read together with Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for a summary of the principal accounting policies and practices applicable to us. There are many other areas in which we use estimates about uncertain matters, but the reasonably likely effect of changed or different estimates is not material to our financial presentation.

 

Oil and Gas Reserves

 

When accounting for our reserves we use the internationally recognized “successful efforts” method of accounting for investments in exploration and production areas. These investments are amortized using the technical units of production method on the basis of proved developed reserves by field. The reserves are based on technical studies prepared internally. Internally estimated reserves are then submitted to an external audit process, which is carried out by our External Engineers. According to our corporate policy, we report the reserves values obtained from the External Engineers. The reserves process ends when the Reserves Directorate consolidates the results and present them to the Reserves Committee, whose members are the Chief Financial Officer, the Exploration and Production Executive Vice-President and the Vice-President of Strategy. Results are presented to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and finally approved by the Board of Directors.

 

The estimation of hydrocarbon reserves is subject to several uncertainties inherent to the determination of proved reserves, production recovery rates, the timelines with which investments are made to develop the reservoirs and the degree of maturity of the fields.

 

Crude oil prices have traditionally fluctuated as a result of a variety of factors such as changes in international prices of natural gas and refined products, long-term changes in the demand for crude oil, natural gas and refined products, regulatory changes, inventory levels, increase in the cost of capital, economic conditions, development of new technologies, economic and political events, and local and global demand and supply. Revisions to proved reserves estimates of crude oil and gas and the effect of such price variations are presented in Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements. Changes in the crude oil price may affect our estimates in the future. A decrease in our estimated proved reserves due to pricing may result in the impairment of oil and gas properties.

 

78
 

 

The calculation of units-of-production depreciation and depletion is a critical accounting estimate that measures the depreciation and depletion of upstream assets. The units of production are equal to the ratio of actual volumes produced to total proved developed reserves (those proved reserves recoverable through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods) and applied to our asset cost.

 

Proved oil and gas properties held and used by us are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Impairments are measured by the amount by which the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Any impairment tests that we perform make use of our long-term price assumptions for the crude oil and natural gas markets and petroleum products.

 

Volumes produced and asset costs are known, while proved reserves have a high probability of recoverability and are based on estimates that are subject to some variability. The impact of changes in estimated proved reserves is treated prospectively by depreciating the remaining book value of the assets over the future expected production, affecting the following year’s net income.

 

Suspended Exploratory Well Costs

 

We capitalizate of exploratory well costs when the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well and the Company is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. Exploratory well costs not meeting these criteria are charged as expense. The facts and circumstances that support continued capitalization of suspended wells as of year-end 2012 are disclosed in Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

In the performance of the impairment testing under U.S. GAAP, our management must make reasonable and supportable assumptions and estimates with respect to: (1) the market value of reserves, (2) oil fields’ production profiles and future production of refined and chemical products, (3) future investments, taxes and costs, (4) future capital expenditures and useful life for properties and (5) future prices, among other factors. As such, any change in the variables used to prepare such assumptions and estimates may have a significant effect on the impairment tests.

 

Financial Derivative Instruments

 

We may enter into hedging agreements to reduce our exposure to the fluctuations of international crude oil and products prices. Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, amounts paid and income received under hedging operations is recognized as financial income/expense. We are not permitted to enter into hedging contracts for speculative purposes.

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, our estimates are based on current spot prices subject to market variations according to the regulation and methodology established by the Superintendency of Finance.

 

Pension Plans and Other Benefits

 

By virtue of Legislative Act 01 of 2005, enacted by Congress, the pension regimes excluded from the General Social Security System in Colombia expired on July 31, 2010. In accordance with provisions therein, it was concluded that those workers who consolidated their right to pension were those workers who complied with the age and continuous or discontinuous service time requirements of the law, the Collective Bargaining Agreement in force and/or Agreement 01 of 1977, prior to August 1, 2010. Other workers who were not covered by the previously described conditions must mandatorily be affiliated with the General Pension System. The agency responsible for paying the respective pension is the pension administrator chosen by the worker (either the governmental institution Colpensiones -formerly the Social Security Institute - or a private pension fund).

 

The determination of the expense, liability and adjustments in memorandum accounts relating to our pension and other retirement benefits requires us to use judgment in the determination of actuarial assumptions. These include active employees with indefinite term contracts, retirees and their heirs, pension benefits, healthcare and education expenses, the number of temporary employees who will remain with us until retirement, voluntary retirement plans and pension bonuses. The calculation of retirement bonds posted by us to meet our pension obligations is regulated by Decrees 1748 of 1995, 1474 of 1997 and 876 of 1998, as well as Law 100 of 1993 and its regulatory decree. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

79
 

 

These actuarial assumptions include estimates of future mortality, withdrawal, changes in compensation and discount rate to reflect the time value of money as well as the rate of return on pension bonds and other plan assets. These assumptions are reviewed at least annually and may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, regulatory events, judicial rulings, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants.

 

In accordance with Resolution 1555 of 2010 and Decree 4565 of 2010 applicable to Colombian Government Entity GAAP, due to the change in the mortality rates in 2010, the Company started to amortize the increase in the pension obligation calculated as of December 31, 2011 using a five-year term. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Actuarial gains and losses, a result of differences between estimates and actual calculations and differences between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP are disclosed in Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements. Changes in interest rates and amendments to plan conditions have affected prior estimates. We believe that the assumptions used in recording our obligations under the plans are reasonable based on our experience and market conditions. See Note 35 of our consolidated financial statements for an analysis of the sensitivity of the assumed health care cost trend rates as a result of a 1% change in interest rates.

 

Litigation and Tax Assessments

 

We are subject to claims for substantial amounts, regulatory and arbitration proceedings, tax assessment and other claims arising in the normal course of business. Management and legal counsel evaluate these situations based on their nature, the likelihood that they materialize, and the amounts involved, to decide on any changes to the amounts accrued and/or disclosed. This analysis includes current legal processes against the Company and claims not yet initiated. In accordance with management’s evaluation and guidance provided by Colombian Government Entity GAAP, we created provisions to meet these costs when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and reasonable estimates of the liability can be made. As of December 31, 2012, we had a provision of Ps$792.894 million for litigation contingencies. We also maintain insurance policies to cover specific operational risks and asset protection.

 

Estimates are based on legal counsel’s evaluation of the cases and management’s judgment. In the past, our estimates have been accurate and have not varied substantially compared to final judgments. We believe that payments required to settle the amounts related to the claims, in case of loss, will not vary significantly from the estimated costs, and thus will not have a material adverse effect on our financial statements taken as a whole. Litigation and tax assessment differences between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP are disclosed in Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Income taxes are accounted for under the assets and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities in the financial statements and their respective tax base. Deferred taxes on assets and liabilities are calculated based on statutory tax rates that we believe will be applied to our taxable income during the years in which temporary differences between the carrying amounts are expected to be recovered.

 

Abandonment of Fields

 

We are required by law to remove equipment and restore the land or seabed at the end of operations at production sites. To estimate this obligation, we include plugging costs and abandonment of wells, dismantling of facilities and environmental recovery of areas and wells. Changes resulting from new estimates of the liability for abandonment can occur as a result of changes in economic conditions. We accrue the estimated discounted costs of dismantling and removing these facilities at the time of installation of the assets.

 

We use economic factors from different sources and develop our own internal estimates of future inflation rates and discount rates. There have not been significant disparities between estimates and asset retirement costs paid. We believe that the assumptions used in recording our asset retirement costs and obligations are reasonable based on our experience and market conditions. The related liability is estimated in local currency and does not require adjustment for exchange difference at the end of each year as a greater or lesser value of assets.

 

Differences between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP are disclosed in Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

80
 

 

Recognition and Measurement of Assets Recognized and Liabilities Assumed upon Business Combinations

 

Under U.S. GAAP, we account for businesses acquired using the purchase method of accounting which requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at the date of acquisition at their respective fair values. The application of the purchase method requires certain estimates and assumptions especially concerning the determination of the fair values of the acquired intangible assets, property, plant and equipment as well as the liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition. In addition, the useful lives of the acquired intangible assets, property, plant and equipment have to be determined. The judgments made in the context of the purchase price allocation can materially impact our future results of operations. Accordingly, for significant acquisitions, we obtain assistance from third-party valuation specialists. The valuations are based on information available at the acquisition date and different methodologies are used for each intangible identified above.

 

Goodwill

 

Under U.S. GAAP, we test goodwill for impairment at least annually using a two-step process that begins with an estimation of the fair value of a reporting unit. The first step is a screen for potential impairment and the second step measures the amount of impairment, if any. However, if certain criteria are met, the requirement to test goodwill for impairment annually can be satisfied without a remeasurement of the fair value of a reporting unit. Fair value is determined by reference to market value, if available, or by a qualified evaluator or pricing model. Determination of a fair value by a qualified evaluator or pricing model requires management to make assumptions and use estimates. Management believes that the assumptions and estimates used are reasonable and supportable in the existing market environment and commensurate with the risk profile of the assets valued. However, different assumptions and estimates could be used which would lead to different results. The valuation models used to determine the fair value of these companies are sensitive to changes in the underlying assumptions. For example, the prices and volumes of product sales to be achieved and the prices which will be paid for the purchase of raw materials are assumptions which may vary in the future. Adverse changes in any of these assumptions could lead us to record a goodwill impairment charge. See Notes 13 and 35 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, goodwill corresponds to the difference between the acquisition price and the book value of the acquired company. This amount is amortized during the period in which the Company expects to receive future benefits. Additionally, under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, goodwill is not subject to impairment tests.

 

Operating Results

 

The following discussion is based on information contained in our audited consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction therewith. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Colombian Government Entity GAAP, which differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. See Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements for a description of the principal differences.

 

Certain line items from our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 related to the presentation of the consolidated Balance Sheet and the Consolidated Statement of Financial, Economic, Social and Environmental Activities have been reclassified in order to make the presentation of such financial statements comparable to that of the financial statements as of December 31, 2012. The main reclassifications were under cost of sales, marketing and projects, accounts payable and related parties, Taxes, contributions and duties payable, Deposits held in trust and Other assets. See Note 34 to our consolidated financial statements for a description of the principal differences.

 

81
 

 

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2012, Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2011, and Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2010.

 

The following table sets forth components of our income statement for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    For the Year ended
December 31,
             
    2012     2011    

2012/2011
% change

    For the Year ended
December 31, 2010
    2011/2010
% change
 
    (Pesos in millions)           (Pesos in millions)        
Revenues                                        
                                         
Total Revenue     68,852,002       65,967,514       4 %     42,089,745       57 %
                                         
Cost of Sales     40,535,508       36,704,584       10 %     25,960,456       41 %
Gross Profit     28,316,494       29,262,930       (3 )%     16,129,289       81 %
                                         
Operating Expenses     4,110,204       3,389,950       21 %     3,381,841       0 %
Operating Income     24,206,290       25,872,980       (6 )%     12,747,448       103 %
                                         
Non-operating income                                        
(expenses)     (1,874,589 )     (2,231,548 )     (16 )%     (1,254,831 )     78 %
Income before income tax     22,331,701       23,641,432       (6 )%     11,492,617       106 %
                                         
Income tax     7,133,395       7,955,721       (10 )%     3,238,650       146 %
Non-controlling interest     419,359       233,377       80 %     107,496       117 %
                                         
Net Income     14,778,947       15,452,334       (4 )%     8,146,471       90 %

 

Total Revenues

 

Methodology

 

We use the following criteria to analyze our financial information by business segment: (1) third party sales are made at market prices by each segment according to their ownership of the products or services sold; (2) each segment bears costs and expenses incurred for production and marketing of its products, the corresponding administrative expenses and those expenses related to non-operational transactions related to its activity; (3) transactions between segments are accounted for as if each segment were a separate entity and prices between segments are determined by reference to those that could be obtained in transactions with third parties.

 

All of our financial information is presented by segment as follows:

 

· Exploration and Production – includes our crude oil and natural gas exploration and production activities.  Revenue is derived from inter-company and inter-segment sales, exports and third-party sales. Revenues, costs and expenses for this segment include those costs incurred by us from the production field to the end customer.  Expenses include all exploration costs that are not capitalized.

 

· Refining and Petrochemicals – includes our refining activities.  Revenue is derived from inter-company and inter-segment sales, exports and third-party sales and corresponds to products processed in our refineries and our downstream subsidiaries such as motor fuels, fuel oils and petrochemicals at market prices. This segment also includes other services sold to third parties.

 

· Marketing and Supply – includes our revenues, costs and expenses associated with marketing and sale of products purchased from third parties and the ANH.

 

· Transportation and Logistics – includes our sales and costs associated with our pipelines and other transportation activities.

 

82
 

 

Results

 

The following table sets forth our principal sources of revenue by business segment for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    For the Year ended December 31,         For the Year ended
December 31,
     
    2012     2011    

2012/2011
% change

    2010  

2011/2010
% change

 
    (Pesos in millions)           (Pesos in millions)        
Exploration and Production segment:                                        
Crude oil:                                        
Local sales     842,975       460,591       83.0 %     123,797       272.1 %
Export sales     26,026,622       24,039,881       8.3 %     13,515,877       77.9 %
Total sales of crude oil     26,869,597       24,500,472       9.7 %     13,639,674       79.6 %
Natural gas:                                        
Local sales     910,953       882,847       3.2 %     712,409       23.9 %
Other income from local sales of natural gas     278,013       210,232       32.2 %     142,018       48.0 %
Export sales     555,813       381,000       45.9 %     101,363       275.9 %
Total sales of natural gas     1,744,779       1,474,079       18.4 %     955,790       54.2 %
Other income from Exploration and Production segment (1)     494,239       197,717       150.0 %     336,009       (41.2 )%
Total Exploration and production segment sales     29,108,615       26,172,268       11.2 %     15,052,907       73.9 %
Exploration and Production segment eliminations in consolidation     (4,659,284 )     (4,068,104 )     14.5 %     (2,859,175 )     42.3 %
Total Exploration and Production segment sales to third parties     24,449,331       22,104,164       10.6 %     12,193,732       81.3 %
Refining and Petrochemicals segment:                                        
Refined products:                                        
Local sales (2)     19,292,525       19,177,196       0.6 %     14,360,357       33.5 %
Sales of refined products allocated to our Exploration and Production segment (3)     (289,252 )     (121,249 )     138.6 %     (226,701 )     (46.5 )%
Other income from local sales of refined products (4)     4,949       6,850       (27.7 )%     32,546       (79.0 )%
Export sales     7,717,048       8,403,561       (8.2 )%     5,641,545       49.0 %
Total Refining and Petrochemicals segment sales     26,725,271       27,466,358       (2.7 )%     19,807,747       38.7 %
Refining and Petrochemicals segment eliminations in consolidation     (64,227 )     (119,393 )     (46.2 )%     (22,337 )     434.5 %
Total Refining and Petrochemicals segments sales to third parties     26,661,044       27,346,965       (2.5 )%     19,785,410       38.2 %
Marketing and Supply segment:                                        
Crude oil sales:                                        
Local sales     -       -       0.0 %     -       0.0 %
Export sales     15,102,638       14,790,487       2.1 %     8,108,425       82.4 %
Total crude oil sales     15,102,638       14,790,487       2.1 %     8,108,425       82.4 %
Natural gas sales:                                        
Local sales     203,175       332,851       (39.0 )%     376,403       (11.6 )%
Other income from local sales of natural gas     748       1,590       (53.0 )%     2,536       (37.3 )%
Export sales     50,198       173,540       (71.1 )%     44,700       288.2 %
Total natural gas sales     254,121       507,981       (50.0 )%     423,639       19.9 %
Refined products sales:                                        
Local sales     861,658       714,874       20.5 %     522,145       36.9 %
Export sales     299,814       179,389       67.1 %     10,246       n.m.  
Other income from local sales     56,414       67,284       (16.2 )%     54,492       23.5 %
Total Marketing and Supply segment sales     16,574,645       16,260,015       1.9 %     9,118,947       78.3 %
Marketing and Supply segment eliminations in consolidation     (684,180 )     (1,413,845 )     (51.6 )%     (772,502 )     83.0 %
Total Marketing and Supply segment sales to third parties     15,890,465       14,846,170       7.0 %     8,346,445       77.9 %
Transportation and logistics segment:                                        
Transportation sales     2,418,903       2,135,953       13.2 %     2,168,032       (1.5 )%
Other income transportation services     461,029       412,010       11.9 %     353,869       16.4 %
Total transportation sales (5)     2,879,932       2,547,963       13.0 %     2,521,901       1.0 %
Transportation segment eliminations in consolidation     (1,028,770 )     (877,747 )     17.2 %     (757,743 )     15.8 %
Total Transportation segment sales to third parties     1,851,162       1,670,215       10.8 %     1,764,158       (5.3 )%
Total Revenues or sales     68,852,002       65,967,514       4.4 %     42,089,745       56.7 %

 

 

n.m. = Not meaningful. 

(1) Corresponds to sales of refined products and services allocated to our Exploration and Production segment.
(2) Includes motor fuel price differential reimbursements by the Nation amounting to Ps$809.7 billion in 2012, Ps$2,251 billion in 2011 and Ps$740.6 billion in 2010.
(3) Corresponds to sales of refined products from our Apiay and Orito refineries allocated to our Exploration and Production segment.
(4) Corresponds to sales of services allocated to our Refining and Petrochemicals segment.

(5) Pursuant to a change in the methodology used to assign the costs and expenses corresponding to transportation services provided to Ecopetrol S.A., in which transportation services provided by third parties are now directly assigned the correspondent segment without being considered income to the transportation segment, certain figures for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were reclassified for presentation purposes to be consistent with those for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

83
 

 

In 2012, total revenues increased by 4.4% as compared to 2011, mainly due to higher prices of the crude oil basket, supported primarily by the higher Brent and Maya benchmarks prices. In addition, revenues increased due to (1) an increase in total volumes sold of crude oil mainly of Vasconia and Magdalena blends and (2) higher local sales of gasolines and medium distillates. In 2011, total revenues increased by 56.7% when compared to 2010 mainly due to higher average price of crude oil and an increase in total volumes.

 

The following table sets forth our total export and local sales of crude oil, natural gas and refined products for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    For the Year ended December 31,           For the Year
ended
December 31,
       
    2012     2011     2012/2011
% change
    2010     2011/2010
% change
 
    (Pesos in millions)     (Pesos in millions)  
Crude oil:                                        
Local sales (barrels)     4,621,107       1,783,807       159.1 %     1,086,090       64.2 %
Export sales (barrels)     192,216,579       181,504,337       5.9 %     131,316,387       38.2 %
Average price per local barrel (in U.S. dollars) (1)     68.95       69.90       (1.4 )%     56.85       23.0 %
Average price per export barrel (in U.S. dollars) (2)     103.93       99.58       4.4 %     72.55       37.3 %
Weighted average price per local and export barrel (in U.S. dollars)     103.11       99.30       3.8 %     72.42       37.1 %
                                         
Natural gas:                                        
Local sales (mbtu)     145,745,113       153,293,739       (4.9 )%     188,681,680       (18.8 )%
Export sales (mbtu)     48,168,567       55,013,647       (12.4 )%     19,701,959       179.2 %
Average local price (mbtu)  (in U.S. dollars) (1)     4.23       4.28       (1.2 )%     3.24       32.1 %
Average export price (mbtu) (in U.S. dollars) (2)     6.62       4.97       33.2 %     3.93       26.5 %
                                         
Refined products:                                        
Product local sales (barrels)     92,890,866       90,900,442       2.2 %     87,271,761       4.2 %
Export sales (barrels)     41,880,845       40,775,850       2.7 %     37,746,666       8.0 %
Average local price per barrel (U.S. dollars) (1)     118.83       116.08       2.4 %     87.74       32.3 %
Average export price per barrel (U.S. dollars) (1)     107.88       112.37       (4.0 )%     78.90       42.4 %

 

 

(1) Corresponds to average price per local barrel translated at an average exchange rate of Ps$1,798.23 to US$1.00 for 2012, Ps$ 1,848.17 to US$1.00 for 2011 and Ps$1,897.89 to US$1.00 for 2010.
(2) Corresponds to the average of the actual prices at which we sold our products in the international markets.

 

Exploration and Production Segment Sales

 

Crude Oil

 

Local Sales

 

Our revenues from local sales of crude oil increased by 83% in 2012 as compared to 2011 mainly due to a 159.1% increase in volumes sold, especially from Rubiales blend as a consequence of higher demand of crude oil from shipping companies. In 2011, our revenues from local sales of crude oil increased by 87.8% in 2011 as compared to 2010, mainly due to an increase in the average price per barrel and a 64.2% increase in the volume sold, primarily due to higher demand from shipping companies and local industries for energy generation purposes.

 

Export Sales

 

Our revenues from exports of crude oil increased by 8.3% in 2012 as compared to 2011, mainly due to a 4.4% increase in the average export price per barrel, explained primarily by the higher Brent and Maya benchmarks prices. Export volumes increased as well by 5.9% primarily due to higher production and export of Vasconia and Magdalena blends. Despite the increase in volumes and prices, the segment’s revenues were impacted by a 2.7% appreciation of the Peso against the U.S. dollar.

 

84
 

 

In 2011, our revenues from exports of crude oil increased by 77.9% as compared to 2010, mainly due to a 37.3% increase in the average export price per barrel, and a 38.2% increase in the volume of export sales. Increased export sales resulted from improvements in our transportation capacity and higher production of Castilla and Magdalena blends, partially offset by a 2.6% appreciation of the Peso against the U.S. dollar.

 

Natural Gas

 

Local Sales

 

Despite the decrease of 4.9% in volume of local sales of natural gas on a consolidated basis, Exploration and Production segment accounted for a higher production of natural gas which led to an increase of 3.2% in local sales in 2012 as compared to 2011. The 4.9% decrease is mainly due to lower gas purchases from the ANH, pursuant to Decree 2100 of 2011, through which other companies are also able to purchase gas directly from the ANH.

 

In 2011, our local sales of natural gas increased by 23.9% as compared to 2010, mainly due to a 32.1% increase in the average local price per mbtu, despite an 18.8% decrease in volumes sold. The decrease in volumes sold was explained by a higher allocation of natural gas for export sales due to the elimination of local regulatory restrictions during 2010 that forced us to guarantee availability of natural gas to supply local gas-fired power plants.

 

Export Sales

 

In 2012, export sales of natural gas increased by 45.9% as compared to 2011, principally due to a 33.2% increase in our average export prices, partially offset by a 12.4% decrease in volumes sold, mainly due to (1) the delay in the start of new projects related to natural gas production and (2) higher domestic thermal demand, and a 2.7% appreciation of the Peso against the U.S. dollar

 

In 2011, export sales of natural gas increased by 275.9% as compared to 2010, principally due to a 179.2% increase in the volume of export sales as a result of higher volumes of natural gas available for export sales, an increase in the natural gas demand from Venezuela, and a 26.5% increase in our average export prices, partially offset by the appreciation of the Peso against the U.S. dollar.

 

Total Exploration and Production Segment Sales to Third Parties

 

In 2012 and 2011, our total Exploration and Production segment sales to third parties increased by 10.6% and 81.3%, respectively, in each case as compared to the prior year principally due to an increase in volumes produced, higher prices for our export crude oil basket and higher selling spreads for our crude oil due to the indexation to the Brent and Maya benchmarks prices.  In addition, during 2012, revenues from this segment were positively impacted by our commercial strategy which included market diversification of sales to countries such as China, India and Singapore.

 

Refining and Petrochemicals Segment Sales

 

Local Sales

 

In 2012, local sales of refined products and petrochemicals increased by 0.6% as compared to 2011, as a result of a 2.4% increase in average local prices and a 2.2% increase in volumes sold due to higher demand for gasoline and middle distillates from automotive, aviation and mining sectors, resulting from the country’s economic growth, partially offset by the appreciation in the average exchange rate of the Peso against the U.S. dollar.

 

Local sales of petrochemicals and refined products increased 33.5% in 2011 as compared to 2010 as a result of a 32.3% increase in average local prices and a 4.2% increase in volumes sold due to the same reasons mentioned in the paragraph above related to Colombia’s economic growth.

 

Export Sales

 

In 2012, export sales of refined products and petrochemicals decreased by 8.2% as compared to 2011 due to a 4.0% decrease in average export prices of our products basket in line with the behavior of international prices partially offset by an increase of 2.7% in volumes sold.

 

85
 

 

Export sales of petrochemicals and refined products increased 49.0% in 2011 as compared to 2010 mainly as a result of a 42.4% increase in average export prices and an 8.0% increase in volumes exported, caused by greater fuel oil production at our Barrancabermeja refinery and an increase in the river transportation availability from Barrancabermeja to the Cartagena export terminal.

 

Total Refining and Petrochemicals Segment Sales to Third Parties

 

In 2012, total refining and petrochemicals segment sales to third parties decreased by 2.5% as compared to 2011 mainly as a result of the lower export sales of gasolines, diesel and fuel oil in line with the 4.0% decrease in average export prices of refined products due to the behavior of international prices.

 

Total refining and petrochemicals segment sales to third parties increased 38.2% in 2011 as compared to 2010 as a result of an increase in selling prices and in the volumes sold.

 

Marketing and Supply Segment Sales

 

Crude Oil

 

Local Sales

 

Since January 2010, we consider crude oil sold to Reficar as an export sale because it corresponds to special free trade zone sales.  We do not have any other revenues that we record as revenues from crude oil local sales and do not record any local sales of crude oil in our Marketing and Supply segment.

 

Export Sales

 

In 2012, export sales of crude oil from our Marketing and Supply segment increased by 2.1% mainly due to a 4.4% increase in the average export price per barrel, mainly supported by the higher Brent and Maya benchmarks prices, and a 5.9% increase in the volume of export sales. Increased export sales also resulted from improvements in our transportation capacity and higher volumes of Vasconia and Magdalena blends commercialized, but were partially offset by a 2.7% appreciation of the Peso against the U.S. dollar.

 

Exports of crude oil allocated to our Marketing and Supply segment went up by 82.4% in 2011 as compared to 2010 as a result of higher volume available from purchases from third parties and the ANH as a result of an increase in other producers’ production and higher average export prices, partially offset by the appreciation of the Peso against the U.S. dollar.

 

Natural Gas

 

Local Sales

 

In 2012, local sales of natural gas from our Marketing and Supply segment decreased by 39.0% as compared to 2011, mainly as a result of less gas available for commercialization due to the decrease in gas purchases from the ANH, pursuant to Decree 2100 of 2011, through which other companies are also able to purchase gas directly from the ANH.

 

Revenues from local sales of natural gas from our Marketing and Supply segment decreased by 11.6% in 2011 as compared to 2010, mainly as a result of lower local demand, partially offset by a 32.1% increase in the average local prices.

 

Export Sales

 

In 2012, export sales of natural gas from our Marketing and Supply segment decreased by 71.1%, as compared to 2011, mainly as a result of  less gas purchased from the ANH, pursuant to Decree 2100 of 2011, as described above.

 

Revenues from export sales of natural gas from our Marketing and Supply segment increased by 288.2% in 2011 as compared to 2010, mainly as a result of an increase in volume of export sales and increase in the average export prices.

 

86
 

 

Marketing and Supply Segment Sales to Third Parties

 

During 2012 and 2011, our Marketing and Supply segment sales to third parties increased by 7.0% and 77.9% respectively, in each case as compared to the prior year, principally due to an increase in the volume of export sales of crude oil and higher average selling prices. In addition, during 2012, the segment’s sales of crude oil were also positively impacted by our commercial strategy which included a market diversification of sales to countries in Asia.

 

Transportation and Logistics Segment Sales

 

In 2012, our Transportation and Logistics segment sales increased by 13.0% as compared to 2011 mainly due to the higher transported volume of crude oil, associated with (1) higher crude oil production in Colombia and (2) higher volume of products, mainly as a result of higher naphtha transported to dilute heavy crude oil. The segment sales were impacted as well by the revision of applicable tariffs charged per transported barrel approved by the Ministry of Mines and Energy.

 

Total transportation sales increased by 1.0% in 2011 as compared to 2010, mainly due to higher volumes transported, offset by a one-time transaction in 2010 and corresponding to a premium received by Ocensa from Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp to increase transportation capacity during that year.

 

Transportation and Logistics Segment Sales to Third Parties

 

Our transportation and logistics segment sales to third parties increased by 10.8% in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to the higher volume of crude oil produced by other companies in Colombia which required higher transportation services.

 

As a result of the above-mentioned increase in the segment volumes transported, after giving effect to eliminations from consolidation, our transportation and logistics segment sales to third parties decreased by 5.3% in 2011 compared to 2010.

 

Cost and Expenses

 

The following table sets forth elements of our cost of sales, operating expenses and operating income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    For the Year ended
December 31,
    2012/2011     For the Year ended
December 31,
    2011/2010  
    2012     2011    

% change

    2010     % change  
    (Pesos in millions)           (Pesos in millions)        
Cost of sales     40,535,508       36,704,584       10 %     25,960,456       41 %
Operating expenses     4,110,204       3,389,950       21 %     3,381,841       0.2 %
Operating Income     24,206,290       25,872,980       (6 )%     12,747,448       103 %

 

Cost of Sales—Consolidated

 

Our cost of sales is affected by a number of factors, including the increase in international prices for crude oil. The most important factors are described below:

 

· Purchases of hydrocarbons from the ANH in 2012 increased 5% to Ps$8,452,336 million compared to 2011 and 51% in 2011 to Ps$8,048,981 million compared to 2010. Both increases were mainly the result of higher average prices and an increase in the volumes purchased.

 

· Purchases of imported products in 2012 increased 7% to Ps$9,447,041 million compared to 2011 and 56% in 2011 to Ps$8,840,450 million as compared to 2010, as a result of (1) higher volumes of naphtha purchased for blending with increasing heavy crude oil production in order to transport it, (2) higher volumes of products (mainly low sulfur diesel) for blending to meet local environmental regulations regarding sulfur content and (3) higher average prices.

 

· Purchases of crude oil from our business partners in 2012 increased 8% to Ps$7,207,707 million compared to 2011 and 47% in 2011 compared to 2010 to Ps$ 6,701,500 million, mainly as a result of higher average prices and an increase in the volumes purchased.

 

87
 

 

· Services contracted with associations, which are pro rata expenses for our joint ventures, increased 14% in 2012 to Ps$2,037,205 million compared to 2011, mainly as a result of an increase in production activities and water treatment expense due to higher bottom sediment contained in crude. Services contracted with associations in 2011 increased 22% to Ps$1,791,681 million compared to 2010 due to an increase in production activities and high-price clauses in our joint venture agreements, which assign us additional production when oil prices are higher than a reference price (the “High-Price Clauses”).

 

· Maintenance costs increased 22% to Ps$1,923,736 million compared to 2011, mainly due to the relocation and replacement of our transmission lines pursuant to our integrity program. See “Item 4. Overview by Business Segment—Transportation and Logistics—Integrity Program.”  In addition, higher costs related the to repair and coating of pipes of existing wells as a result of the heavy rain season.  Maintenance costs in 2011 increased 37% to Ps$1,570,912 million compared to 2010, mainly due to an increase in our operating activities and actions taken under our maintenance plan.

 

· Labor costs in 2012 increased 9% to Ps$1,095,479 million compared to 2011 as a result of an 11.1% increase in our total number of employees due to an increase in our operations and projects. Labor costs increased by 6% to Ps$1,001,102 million in 2011 as compared to 2010 as a result of an 8% increase in our total number of employees, due to an increase in our operations and projects.

 

· Depreciation costs increased 4% to Ps$1,886,620 million in 2012 compared to 2011 and 17% to Ps$1,809,546 million in 2011 as compared to 2010, in each year mainly due to new investments and transport systems.

 

· Services contracted with third parties increased 25% to Ps$1,088,597 million compared to 2011 and 2% in 2011 to Ps$872,565 million as compared to 2010, in each year as a result of increased supervision and technical management contracts for our business associations, due to increased exploration activity.

 

The principal elements of our cost of sales by business segments are as follows:

 

Exploration and Production Segment’s Cost of Sales

 

Cost of sales affecting our Exploration and Production segment are mainly related to the amortization and depletion of our production assets, services contracted with outside vendors, maintenance costs, project expenses and labor costs related to this segment. In addition, this segment’s costs were impacted by imported naphtha and transportation services.

 

In 2012, cost of sales for this segment increased by 14.8% compared to 2011, mainly due to a 22.2% increase in cost of imported and locally purchased naphtha necessary to dilute and transport heavy crude oil, and a 14% increase of contracted services in the Joint Venture Agreements of the Rubiales and Quifa fields corresponding to higher subsoil activities and water treatment.

 

In 2011, cost of sales for this segment increased by 44.6%, mainly due to a 32.3% increase in our heavy crude oil production, which required increased purchases of imported naphtha to dilute and transport crude oil, and an increase in costs of services contracted (subject to High-Price Clauses) with certain business associations, such as Cravo Norte and La Cira, due to higher production and participation levels.

 

Refined Products and Petrochemicals Segment’s Cost of Sales

 

Cost of sales affecting our refined products and petrochemicals segment results primarily from the purchase of crude oil and natural gas to upload and feed our refineries, imported products for the refining process, feed stock transportation services, services contracted for refinery maintenance, and amortization and depreciation of refining assets.

 

In 2012, cost of sales for this segment remained practically flat compared to 2011, principally due to a 4.6% decrease in crude oil purchased from our Exploration and Production segment to upload our refineries, offset by a 4.0% increase in the cost of imported products and crude oil purchased from the ANH and third parties.

 

In 2011, cost of sales for this segment increased by 35.1% as compared to 2010, principally due to higher prices for the crude oil purchased from our Exploration and Production segment, third parties and the ANH.

 

88
 

 

Marketing and Supply Segment’s Cost of Sales

 

Cost of sales affecting our Marketing and Supply segment are mainly related to the costs associated with purchases of crude oil and natural gas volumes from the ANH and our business partners.

 

Cost of sales for this segment increased by 4.7% in 2012 and by 80.4% in 2011 due to the increase in volumes and prices of the crude oil purchased from the ANH and third parties. In 2011, costs were impacted by higher volumes and prices of natural gas purchased.

 

Transportation and Logistics Segment’s Cost of Sales

 

Cost of sales affecting our transportation and logistics segment are: (1) project costs, which relate to costs associated with the maintenance of transportation networks and (2) construction and conversion of existing pipelines for the transportation of heavy crude oil.

 

Cost of sales for this segment increased by 2.6% in 2012 as compared to 2011 principally due to the higher maintenance and contracted services costs associated with the development of our integrity program. See “Item 4. Overview by Business Segment—Transportation and Logistics—Integrity Program.”

 

Cost of sales for this segment increased by 31.5% in 2011 as compared to 2010 due to an increase in volumes transported through pipelines and tanker trucks and an increase in maintenance costs as a result of the heavy rain season that forced us to increase pipeline maintenance activities.

 

Operating Expenses

 

In 2012, our operating expenses increased by 21% as compared to 2011, mainly as a result of the following factors:

 

· An increase in provisions of 604% mainly due to valuation of property, plant and equipment. As per Colombian Government Entity GAAP, valuation of assets is to be performed every three years being in 2012. This process involves the comparison between the net book value and a technical value for a specific asset. The result of such exercise was the taking of a provision for impairment of some assets, mainly for buildings and transportation equipment from the Exploration and Production segment and the Transportation segment.

 

· Labor expenses for operating and projects increased by 46% as a result of an increase in the number of employees, which, in turn, increased both wages and other benefits.

 

· An increase in exploration expenses of 48%, primarily as a result of seismic studies and unsuccessful explorations.

 

· An increase in overhead operational expenses of 19% primarily as a consequence of additional agreements signed with national police force as a strategy to ensure the normal course of operations. This entry was also affected by higher freight and customs charges on foreign sales.

 

In 2011, our operating expenses increased by 0.2% as compared to 2010, mainly as a result of the following factors:

 

· Amortizations increased 50% in 2011 as compared to 2010 mainly as a result of goodwill amortizations.

 

· Operating and administrative labor expenses increased 174% and 26%, respectively, as a result of the increased activities and projects.

 

· An increase in taxes in 2011 as compared to 2010 due to the tax effect on the consolidation of Equion with Ecopetrol and the recognition of net worth tax of our subsidiaries Reficar, Ocensa and Oleoducto de Colombia.

 

· Increases in amortizations, labor expenses and taxes were mainly offset by a decrease of 87% in operational allowances and a 97% decrease in the amount of fines paid for the non-fulfilment in gas supply in 2010.

 

Each segment bears the costs and expenses incurred for product use or marketing and each segment assumes administrative expenses and all non-operational transactions related to their activity. Operating expenses by business segment are described below.

 

89
 

 

Exploration and Production Segment’s Operating Expenses

 

Operating expenses affecting our Exploration and Production segment are primarily for studies and projects, which correspond to expensing dry wells, amortization of the goodwill from our acquisitions and administrative expenses assigned to this segment.

 

These expenses increased by 28.3% in 2012 as compared to 2011 mainly due to the higher provisions for property, plant and equipment generated by the update made on the valuation of property, plant and equipment, as described above. In 2011, these expenses decreased by 8.8% as compared to the prior year.

 

Refining and Petrochemicals Segment’s Operating Expenses

 

Operating expenses affecting our Refining and Petrochemicals segment result primarily due to the amortization of goodwill from acquisitions, projects and administrative expenses assigned to this segment. In 2012, operating expenses decreased by 3.3% as compared to 2011 mainly due to the lower administrative expenses. In 2011, as compared to 2010, operating expenses increased by 10.6% mainly due to non-capitalized projects expenses.

 

Marketing and Supply Segment’s Operating Expenses

 

Operating expenses affecting our Marketing and Supply segment result primarily from relatively low administrative expenses related to the commercialization of crude oil and natural gas assigned to this segment. In 2012, operating expenses decreased by 4.9% mainly due to the lower Selling and Projects expenses.

 

Transportation and Logistics Segment’s Operating Expenses

 

Operating expenses affecting our Transportation and Logistics segment result primarily from the amortization of the goodwill from acquisitions assigned to this segment and the development of projects in order to improve our transportation systems. In 2012 and 2011, operating expenses increased by 30.1% and 81.2%, respectively, mainly due to expenses related to our increased transportation and logistics activity.

 

Non-Operating Income (Expenses)

 

The following table sets forth our non-operating income (expenses) for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    At December 31,     2012/2011     At December 31,     2011/2010  
    2012     2011    

% change

    2010  

% change

 
    (Pesos in millions)           (Pesos in millions)        
Non-operating income (expenses):                                        
Financial income, net     (167,889 )     (904,302 )     (81 )%     37,789       n.m.  
Pension expenses     (948,455 )     (706,298 )     34 %     (377,626 )     87.0 %
Inflation gain     97,663       21,836       347 %     22,030       (0.9 )%
 Other income (expenses), net     (855,908 )     (642,784 )     33 %     (937,024 )     (31 )%

 

 

n.m. = Not meaningful.

 

Financial income, net . Financial income, net, mainly includes exchange difference gains or losses and , interest expenses, yields and interest from our investments, and results from our hedging operations. During 2012, our results reflected a net financial expense primarily due to the cumulative exchange rate loss resulting from the appreciation of the Peso against the U.S. dollar. During 2011, our results reflected a net financial expense due to the results in our commodity hedging financial side (put options on WTI Nymex and swaps calculated using the Maya-WTI spread), affected by the spreads between Maya heavy crude oil and WTI light crude oil benchmark prices, which resulted in higher prices for heavy crude oil compared to those of the light crude oil.

 

90
 

 

Pension expenses . Pension expenses grew by 34% in 2012 when compared to 2011, principally as a result of (1) an actuarial calculation update for the health reserve due an increase of approximately 23% in the average health services costs per beneficiary and an increase of approximately 3.5% in the population covered (retirees and their beneficiaries) and (2) an increase of approximately 9% in the education reserve. Additionally, the actuarial calculation of 2012 included an increase of 1.5% on top of inflation taking into account the upward trend in the Company’s growth. In 2011, pension expenses increased by 87% when compared to 2010, mostly as a result of (1) the actuarial calculation updating the health reserve which increased mainly due to a rise of approximately 21% in the average health services costs per beneficiary and an increase of approximately 15% in the population covered (retirees and their beneficiaries) and (2) an increase in health care services resulting from an increase of approximately 20% in medicine supplies and services due to the increase in the average age of the retirees and their beneficiaries. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Other income (expenses), net. Other income, net, includes recovery of provisions, other revenues and other recoveries. Other expenses, net, include legal and other provisions and taxes unrelated to income. Other income (expenses), net, increased by 33% in 2012 compared to 2011, mainly due to a decrease of 27% in other income in 2012 as compared to 2011, mainly as a result of (1) a decrease of 14% in allowance recoveries due to a lower recovery in 2012 of environmental, legal and healthcare provisions and (2) recovery of expenses in 2011 which had no longer effect in 2012. As of December 31, 2011, there had been an increase in recovery of services to partners, which mainly corresponded to (1) recoveries of associated pension services, product of our association with Occidental Petroleum Corporation and (2) income from commercially-declared fields held in association with partners. Other income (expenses) decreased 31% in 2011 compared to 2010, principally due to a recovery of past provisions for legal proceedings and other recoveries, such as the recovery of our allowance for pension liabilities, partially offset by an increase in taxes not related to income and new legal, pension liability and other provisions.

 

Income Before Income Tax

 

Income before income tax decreased by 5.5% in 2012 as compared to 2011. This was mainly due to higher unexpected costs of water treatment and higher prices of larger volume purchases of hydrocarbons. Income before income tax increased by 105.7% in 2011, compared to 2010, as a result of higher revenues from greater average price of crude oil and an increase in the exported volumes of crude oil.

 

Income Tax

 

The effective income tax rate for 2012 was 31.9% compared to 33.7% in 2011 and 28.2% in 2010.  The decrease in the effective income tax rate in 2012 compared to 2011 was primarily due to the deferred tax credit on the valuation of investments, which caused a reduction of 1.65% in the tax rate. The increase in the effective income tax rate in 2011 compared to 2010 was primarily due to the elimination, as of January 1, 2011, of the income tax deductions on investments in real productive fixed assets.

 

Net Income

 

As a result of the foregoing, in 2012 our net income decreased by 4.36% as compared to 2011. In 2011, it increased by 90% as compared to 2010.

 

Principal Differences Between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP

 

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with Colombian Government Entity GAAP. The accounting principles and regulations under Colombian Government Entity GAAP differ in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. The following is a description of the most relevant differences between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP. Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements presents reconciliations of net income and shareholders’ equity determined under Colombian Government Entity GAAP to these same amounts as determined according to U.S. GAAP, as well as a complete description of the differences between the two accounting standards. The principal differences between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP are as follows:

 

Advances Received from Ecogas for Build, Operate, Maintain and Transfer Contracts

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, payment obligations under the Build, Operate, Maintain and Transfer, or BOMT, contracts were treated as equivalent to an operating lease. Under U.S. GAAP, the obligations were treated as capital leases, and an asset and liability were recognized. Payments under the BOMT contracts serve to reduce liability and the asset is depreciated. Subsequently, we subleased the same asset to Ecogas, with the corresponding treatment of the payments receivable from Ecogas as direct financing leases for U.S. GAAP purposes.

 

91
 

 

Reversal of Concessions

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, we recorded an asset for the contributions of the Nation of crude oil and natural gas reserves derived from the return of oil field concessions to the Nation, which took place before the effectiveness of Decree 1760 of 2003 came into effect. Reserves were valued by means of the technical-economic model where the value per barrel resulted from the relation of the net present value obtained at a discount rate and the total proved reserves on the contribution date. For U.S. GAAP purposes, these reversions were considered a transfer of assets between entities under common control. Ecopetrol as the entity that received the net assets, should have initially recognized the assets transferred at their carrying amounts in the accounts of the transferring entity at the date of transfer, which in this case would be zero as the transferring entity did not recognize a carrying value.

 

Effects of Inflation on Financial Information

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared from the accounting records, which are maintained under the historical cost convention, modified since 1992 to comply with the legal provisions of the CGN to recognize the effect of inflation on non-monetary balance sheet accounts until December 31, 2001, including equity. The CGN eliminated the use of inflation adjustments for accounting purposes for state-owned companies starting on January 1, 2002. However, our consolidated financial statements recognize the effect of inflation on non-monetary balance sheet accounts for an extended period from January 1, 1992 until December 31, 2006 for Propilco S.A., COMAI – Compounding and Masterbatching Industry Ltda, Hocol, Oleoducto de Colombia S.A., and Ocensa because prior to our acquisition of these companies, they were subject to the accounting rules applicable to Colombian privately owned entities. Under such rules, the effect of inflation on non-monetary balance sheet accounts was required to be recognized until December 31, 2006. The accumulated inflation adjustments were eliminated in the process of reconciling our financial statements to U.S. GAAP.

 

Valuation Surplus

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, property, plant and equipment are revalued every three years in accordance with market value and the investments in unconsolidated investees are revalued by using the equity intrinsic value (percentage of ownership of the Company in the equity of the investee). The excess of these amounts over the carrying amount is treated as valuation surplus with a corresponding amount in equity (valuation surplus). Revaluation of these assets is not done for purposes of U.S. GAAP.

 

Variable Interest Entity

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, consolidation with significant subsidiaries is required when there is control by having more than 50% ownership or majority of the voting rights in the subsidiary. Under U.S. GAAP (FIN 46 (R)), if an entity has variable interests whereby one party absorbs losses or benefits from net profits in excess of its ownership interest then those variable interests must be evaluated. Ocensa was not consolidated under Colombian Government Entity GAAP until March 2009 since Ocensa was a variable interest entity under the rules of ASC 810 and was included in our consolidated results pursuant thereto until March 2009. Thereafter, Ocensa was consolidated under both Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP. See Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements for a description of our analysis.

 

Equity Method Accounting

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, the equity method is applied for investments where significant influence, but not control, exists. However, unlike U.S. GAAP, there is no ownership requirement between 20% to 50%.

 

Employee Benefit Plans

 

There are significant differences in the measurement of expense and balance sheet amounts for employee benefit plans between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP. See “—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Pension Plans and Other Benefits” and Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Investment Securities

 

There are significant differences in the measurement of expense and balance sheet amounts for investments between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP. See Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

92
 

 

Provisions — Allowances and Contingences

 

There are significant differences in the measurement of expense and balance sheet amounts for provisions—allowances and contingences—between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP. See Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Cumulative Translation Adjustment

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, foreign currency investments held in a currency other than U.S. dollars must be remeasured to U.S. dollars prior to translating such financial information to Colombian pesos as the reporting currency. Any impact as a result of the translation process is recognized in equity as cumulative translation adjustments.

 

Under U.S. GAAP, investments in foreign currency must be remeasured to the functional currency with the effects recorded in the income statement and translate them to the reporting currency with the effects recognized in equity as cumulative translation adjustments.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our principal sources of liquidity in 2012 were cash flows from our operations amounting to Ps$20,531,233 million and cash flows from financing activities, mainly from the proceeds of our additional indebtedness, which totaled Ps$5,110,249 million. Our principal uses of liquidity in 2012 were (1) Ps$15,467,862 million in capital expenditures, which included investments in natural and environmental resources and reserves, and additions to our property, plant and equipment, (2) dividend payments for the fiscal year 2012 amounting to Ps$ 8,419,331 million and (3) taxes charged to Ecopetrol amounting to Ps$8,320,779. We believe that our financial performance driven by high production and favorable prices along with our access to additional indebtedness have resulted in cash sufficient to fund our operational activities and our investment plan.

 

At December 31, 2012, we had outstanding consolidated indebtedness of Ps$13,705,825 million, which corresponded mainly to:

 

· Ps$1,600 billion (approximately US$905 million) outstanding out of a Ps$ 2,220 billion (approximately US$1 billion) under a syndicated loan facility entered into by Ecopetrol with a syndicate of 11 local banks in May 2009. This loan facility has a term of seven years with a two-year grace period. The interest rate under the facility equals the DTF, plus an additional 4%. We make amortization payments semi-annually under the facility. In November 2011, we modified the guarantee we initially granted in this loan by replacing the original pledge over direct stock in Reficar (which was 49% of the total shares at the time of the loan), Ocensa and Propilco with a new pledge over our direct stock in Hocol Petroleum Limited, Offshore International Group (which corresponds to 50% of the total share) and Propilco. We used the proceeds from this loan to finance our Strategic Plan.

 

· An issuance of US$1,500 million aggregate principal amounts of 7.625% Notes Due 2019 (the “Original Notes”) on July 23, 2009 by Ecopetrol. The Original Notes were issued pursuant to Rule 144A/ Regulation S with registration rights with the SEC. The Original Notes were subsequently registered with the SEC on September 3, 2009 (the “Registered Notes”). Concurrently with this registration, we commenced an exchange offer to exchange up to US$1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of the Registered Notes for an equal principal amount of our outstanding Original Notes under the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in a prospectus dated September 3, 2009. The exchange offer was carried out in compliance with the obligations acquired by us under the Registration Rights Agreement referred to in the prospectus. The exchange offer expired on October 2, 2009. Bond exchange requests were received in an aggregate amount of US$1,492,541,000. On October 7, 2009, we issued an aggregate amount of US $1,492,541,000 in Registered Notes and cancelled an aggregate amount of US$1,492,541,000 in Original Notes. The Registered Notes were listed on the NYSE.

 

· A local issuance of Ps$1,000 billion (approximately US$517 million) notes on December 1, 2010 by Ecopetrol. The notes were issued in four tranches with maturities of five, seven, ten and 30 years and with variable interest rates based on the Consumer Price Index plus spreads of 2.80%, 3.30%, 3.94% and 4.90%, respectively. The notes have semi-annual payments of interest and bullet amortization for each tranche. We used the proceeds from the offering of these notes to finance our capital expenditures in 2010.

 

93
 

 

· US$2.7 billion outstanding out of US$3.5 billion under three facilities held by Reficar with international banks and export credit agencies (United States Export Credit Agency, Export-Import Bank of the United States (the US Eximbank), the Italian Export Credit Agency (SACE) and Exportkreditnämnden (EKN), the official Export Credit Agency in Sweden) to finance the refinery’s expansion. The facilities have a tenor of 16 years and begin amortization as of June 2014.

 

· ODL: Ps$720 billion (approximately US$407 million) outstanding out of Ps$800 billion under a loan facility with local banks. This loan facility was executed in May 2010 and has a term of seven years with a two-year grace period and the principal amount will be amortized in 20 equal quarterly payments. This loan has an interest rate of DTF + 4%.

 

· ODL: Ps$400 billion (approximately US$226 million) series of notes outstanding, having a maturity of seven years, will be amortized in five equal payments from 2012 to 2016 and have an interest rate based on the consumer price index plus an additional spread of 4.88%.

 

· Oleoducto Bicentenario de Colombia: Ps$1,295 billion (approximately US$732 million) out of Ps$2.1 trillion under a facility due in 2024 with an interest rate of DTF + 4.54%. The loan will be amortized in 44 quarterly payments after a one-year grace period.

 

· Ocensa: Ps$900 billion (approximately US$509 million) outstanding out of Ps$1,200 billion under a term facility due 2017 with an interest rate of DTF + 4%. We make amortization payments semi-annually under the facility.

 

On March 22, 2013, we entered into a credit facility guaranteed by the US Eximbank. The four international lender banks are JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ LTD, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. and Citibank N.A.

 

The facility consists of two parts, whose terms are governed by: (1) a Facility Agreement for US$420,442,800, amortized over 7 years at a rate of LIBOR + 0.65 and (2) a Credit Agreement for US$426,616,323, amortized over 10 years at a rate of Libor + 0.90. The funds can only be disbursed abroad and used exclusively to pay for goods and services purchased from U.S. providers. Therefore, none of the foreign currency disbursed pursuant to these facilities will be entering Colombia. Ecopetrol has not yet drawn on either of these facilities.

 

Use of Funds

 

Capital Expenditures

 

The following table sets forth our consolidated capital expenditures for each of our business segments for 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    For the Year ended December 31,  
    2012     2011     2010  
    (Pesos in millions)  
Exploration and Production     8,223,165       8,067,968       5,878,246  
Refining and Petrochemicals     4,458,762       3,044,252       2,084,554  
Transportation and Logistics     2,781,277       3,382,463       2,351,662  
Corporate     -       -       -  
Marketing and Supply     4,657       5,988       5,513  
Total     15,467,862       14,500,671       10,319,975  

 

The budget for our capital expenditures under our Strategic Plan for the period 2012 - 2020 is approximately US$84.7 billion distributed by business segment. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Company—Strategic Plan.”

 

94
 

 

Our investment plan approved for 2013 amounts to US$9,549 million of which US$6,590 million is expected to be invested directly in Ecopetrol S.A. and US$2,959 million in our subsidiaries. According to the plan, 93% of investments are expected to be made in Colombia and the remaining 7% for exploration and production projects along the U.S. Gulf Coast, Brazil and Peru. As in prior years, the majority of investments (62%) is intended for exploration and production. From the investment amount in our subsidiaries in 2013, US$1.336million is expected to be invested by them through their own cash generation, commercial financing and third-party or partner contributions, and distributed by segments as follows: 43% in downstream, 19% in midstream and 38% in upstream branches. We expect our existing and anticipated working capital, capital expenditure requirements and declared dividend payments to be met from our cash flows from operations and cash on hand, and to fund part of our capital expenditures through the local and international financial markets. We believe that we should be able to access local and international debt markets if the need arises, although we can make no assurances that these external sources of financing will be available in terms acceptable to us, if at all. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks related to our business.” Furthermore, we may decide to access the equity markets through the issuance of an additional 8.49% of our common stock as authorized by Law 1118 of 2006, or through credit facilities with commercial banks, export development credits and sale of shares in non-strategic assets. The schedule for carrying out our investment plan depends on our cash generating activities, capital market conditions, execution of the investment budget in the various business areas and possible acquisitions. Our investment plan and anticipated capital expenditures in future years may change based on market and other conditions and our results of operations and financial resources.

 

Cash from Operating Activities

 

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by 11% in 2012 compared to 2011 as a result of a 10% increase in cost of sales as a result of purchases of crude oil at higher international prices. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by 59% in 2011 compared to 2010 as a result of an increase in the average price of crude oil and natural gas and in volumes produced, which resulted in a 57% increase in our total revenues.

 

Cash Used in Investing Activities

 

In 2012, net cash used in investing activities decreased by 7% as compared to 2011 mainly due to the fact that we did not make any acquisition of companies as was the case in 2011. Additionally, during 2012, the investments for liquidity purposes decreased according to internal policies.

 

Net cash used in investing activities increased by 35% in 2011 compared to 2010 mainly as a result of an increase in our property, plant and equipment investments resulting from our increasing activities. These investments were partially funded by cash provided by our portfolio investments, which totaled Ps$9,861,330 million.

 

Cash Used in Financing Activities

 

Net cash used in financing activities increased 22% in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to an increase in dividend payments, partially offset by cash inflows derived from indebtedness from our subsidiaries Reficar and Bicentenario. Net cash used in financing activities increased in 2011 compared to 2010 mainly due to an increase in dividend payments, partially offset by the proceeds from the second round of our shares offering and from our minority interest in other companies. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

 

Dividends

 

In 2012, we paid dividends of Ps$8,419,331 million to our shareholders, including the Nation, to whom we owed Ps$3,915,436 million as of December 31 2012. That amount was paid as of January 2013. On March 21, 2013, our shareholders at the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting approved dividends for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, amounting to Ps$11,964,959 million, or Ps$291 per share, based on the number of outstanding shares at December 31, 2012. The dividend per share was comprised of an ordinary dividend of Ps$255 per share and an extraordinary dividend of Ps$36 per share. Ordinary dividends corresponding to the Nation will be paid in six installments. The first payment was made on April 15, the second will be made on September 16, the third will be made in October 16, the fourth will be made on November 14, the fifth will be made on December 6, and the last payment will be made between December 2013 and January 15, 2014. The extraordinary dividend to be paid to the Nation will be paid between December 16, 2013 and January 31, 2014. The payment of the ordinary and extraordinary dividend to the minority shareholders was made in one lump sum on April 15, 2013.

 

Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.

 

Our Vice-Presidency of Technology and Innovation was created in 2012 to add value to our business chain through the managing of innovation, technology, knowledge and development of competitive advantage. The Vice-Presidency of Technology oversees three directorates: The Colombian Petroleum Institute ( Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo , ICP or the Institute), the Directorate of Information Technology, or DTI, and the new Strategic Directorate of Knowledge, Innovation and Technology, or DCT.

 

95
 

 

Our research and development activities are conducted by the Institute, our research, development, transfer and data-protection unit. Its activities are focused on developing technology solutions for us and the Colombian oil industry. Its scope covers the entire value chain of the company: exploration, production, refining, transportation, supply and marketing, as well as environmental issues, integrity and automatization. Each year, we present to the Colombian Institute for the Development of Science and Technology ( Instituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología , or COLCIENCIAS) our research and development projects in order to get a certification for our investment in science and technology. In 2012, 2011 and 2010, COLCIENCIAS recognized investments of US$86.15 million, US$50.83 million, and US$46.5 million, respectively, in science and technology projects. Our total investment in science and technology during 2012 was approximately US$97.3 million, of which approximately US$52.26 million corresponded to 12 high-risk projects in research and development related to air and chemicals injection in oil fields, application of technologies for offshore exploration, petroleum systems in convergent margins, non-conventional hydrocarbons, biofuels, petrochemicals new refining processes, scaling deasphalting process and heavy oil upgrading, among others. We also invested US$45 million in projects for specialized technical and technological development as well as knowledge for strategic business groups. In 2011, we invested approximately US$67.8 million, and in 2010 we invested approximately US$69.1 million.

 

Our intellectual capital is preserved through a technological value-generation process and an intellectual property protection process, which include the consolidation of trade secrets, patents, copyrights, trademarks and publications in specialized journals. In the last seven years, we have filed 126 new patent applications including nine in 2012 for issues related to 3D seismic acquisition, surfactants for hydrocarbon transport, detection drilling tools for pipes and processes for production of bio-products from vegetable oils.

 

We currently hold 44 patents in Colombia, the United States, Mexico, Russia, Peru, Venezuela, Ecuador, Brazil and Nigeria. In 2012, 21 new patents were granted. In addition, a layout-design of integrated circuit was awarded in Colombia. Our efforts in applications have been focused on improving additives production and the optimization of refining processes, equipment and tools to prevent fuel theft from pipelines, improvements in the transport of heavy and extra heavy crude oils and processes to obtain biofuels from vegetable oils at refineries, among others. In 2011, we filed for 28 new patents in various countries, including Colombia, the United States, Brazil, Mexico, Indonesia and Malaysia. One of our most significant patents for which we filed an application in 2009, is an anti-theft patent that allowed us to reduce fuel oil and crude oil theft by 50% in 2009 compared to 2008. Most of our patents will expire between 2016 and 2029.

 

In 2012, we registered eight copyrights, reaching a total 135. We also registered 33 trademarks, such as our first slogan, “Clean Barrels.”

 

During 2012 and 2011, two new commercial brands were granted to us. In 2010, we were also granted nine new commercial brands, adding to the 20 brands we had been granted previously (the existing brands have been renewed for an additional ten-year period).

 

Ecopetrol became the first Colombian company to obtain the American MAKE Prize (Most Admired Knowledge Enterprises), an international award that recognizes a company’s ability to transfer knowledge in order to improve performance through its operational, administrative and management areas. We were ranked among the ten best in this category of the Americas. Likewise, Ecopetrol has been selected for the third consecutive year as a finalist for the Global MAKE award, where it was ranked 28 among 112 nominees worldwide.

 

In 2010, the ICP’s Technical Information Center became one of the first specialized information units in the oil and gas sector in Latin America to receive the certification in the System of Information Security Management under the NTC/ISO 27001:2005, standard granted by the Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas , or ICONTEC, a Colombian National Standards organization.

 

In 2012, the scores for repeatability and reproducibility programs conducted by the ICP with about two thousand international laboratories from the American Society for Testing and Materials, or ASTM, the United Kingdom Petroleum Institute and Shell, among others, remained above 95%, keeping the international quality standards for laboratories.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of December 31, 2012, we did not have off-balance sheet arrangements of the type that we are required to disclose under Item 5.E of Form 20-F.

 

96
 

 

Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

 

Contractual Obligations

 

We enter into various commitments and contractual obligations that may require future cash payments. The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2012.

 

Payments Due by Period

 

    Payments due by period  
    Total     Less than 1
Year
    1 to 3
years
    3 to 5
years
    More than 5
years
 
    (Pesos in millions)  
                               
Contractual Obligations:                                        
Employee Benefit Plan     23,383,379       894,522       2,901,201       3,214,951       16,372,705  
Contract Service Obligations     4,850,309       2,261,958       2,426,488       75,907       85,956  
Operating Lease Obligations     239,430       77,424       145,714       15,615       677  
Natural Gas Supply Agreements     905,382       166,074       315,403       209,101       214,805  
Purchase Obligations     204,623       114,833       89,791       -       -  
Energy Supply Agreements     186,946       100,981       71,968       13,885       112  
Capital Expenditures     2,338,684       2,147,849       172,631       9,095       9,108  
Build, Operate, Maintain and  Transfer Contracts (BOMT)     395,422       55,789       113,187       104,976       12,146  
Capital (Finance) Lease Obligations     65,583       23,468       37,209       4,905       -  
Financial Sector Debt     13,043,545       1,529,364       5,180,899       1,570,173       4,763,109  
Bonds     6,032,396       270,944       904,952       662,253       4,194,247  
Total     51,536,375       7,643,206       12,359,443       5,880,861       25,652,865  

 

97
 

 

ITEM 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees

 

Directors and Senior Management

 

The information below sets forth the names and business experience of each of our Directors, executive officers and senior management, as of the date hereof:

 

Directors of Ecopetrol

 

The following are our current Directors as elected at the shareholders’ meeting held on March 21, 2013:

 

Minister of Mines and Energy, Federico Rengifo Vélez (59) has been member of our Board of Directors since March 24, 2011. He has served as Minister of the Interior and Director of the Administrative Department of the Presidency of the Republic of Colombia. He has also been Vice-Minister and Minister of Finance, Economic Development, and Mines and Energy of Colombia. He has served as Executive President of the Banco de Colombia, President of Compañia Financiera Internacional S.A., and member of the city council of Cali (Valle del Cauca – Colombia), among others. Currently, Mr. Rengifo is also a member of the Board of Directors of ISA, Isagen and chairman of the board of the National Hydrocarbons Agency and the Institute of Geological Services. He has participated in several boards of directors of the financial and public sectors. Mr. Rengifo is a lawyer of Javeriana University and has a master’s degree in socioeconomic sciences. Mr. Rengifo was appointed as a director by the Nation.

 

Minister of Finance and Public Credit, Mauricio Cárdenas Santamaría (50) has been a member of our Board of Directors since March 27, 2008. Mr. Cárdenas was the Minister of Mines and Energy of Colombia from September 26, 2011 to August 30, 2012. He has served as Senior Fellow and Director for Latin America Initiative of Brookings Institution, Massachusetts, Washington, D.C. Previously, Mr. Cárdenas served as Executive Director of Fedesarrollo (Fundación para la Educación Superior y el Desarrollo), President of Empresa de Energía Eléctrica de Bogotá, Minister of Economic Development, Minister of Transport and Director of the National Planning Agency of Colombia. Mr. Cárdenas has also served as a member of the Board of Directors of various organizations, including the Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association (LACEA), Universidad de los Andes and the BVC. Currently, he is a director of the Central Bank of Colombia. Mr. Cárdenas holds a BA and an MSc in economics from the Universidad de los Andes and a Ph.D. in economics from the University of California, Berkeley. In 2001, Mr. Cárdenas was a visiting scholar at Harvard University’s Center for International Development. In 1999, he was elected by Time Magazine and CNN as one of Latin America’s Leaders for the New Millennium. Mr. Cárdenas was appointed as director by the Nation.

 

Director of the National Planning Agency of Colombia, Mauricio Santamaría Salamanca (46) has been a member of our Board of Directors since January 24, 2012. He was Minister of Health and Social Protection between 2010 and 2012. He has been Deputy Director and Deputy Executive Director of Fedesarrollo. He also has been Deputy Director and Director of Infrastructure and Energy, Director of Social Development and head of the Foreign Business Division of the National Planning Agency of Colombia. Mr. Santamaría was a Senior Economist and Advisor at the World Bank. He was a member of the Board of Directors of Ecopetrol in 2006. He earned a Ph.D. degree and a master’s degree in economics from Georgetown University. He holds a BA in economics from the Universidad de los Andes. Mr. Santamaría was appointed as a director by the Nation.

 

Jorge Pinzón Sánchez (54) has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 6, 2012. He is a freelance attorney and an arbitrator registered at the Centers of Conciliation and Arbitration of the Chambers of Commerce of Bogotá and Barranquilla. He was a partner at Estudios Palacios Lleras S.A. and served as the head of the Superintendency of Corporations as well as of the Superintendency of Finance of Colombia. He was also a member of the Advisory Committee of the Banking Superintendency, member of the General Board of the Securities Superintendency of Colombia, Secretary General of the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit and Deputy General Counsel, Secretary General and General Counsel of Banco del Comercio, among other positions in the public and private sector. He serves as an arbitrator in the Center of Arbitration of the Chamber of Commerce of Bogotá and served several years as a Colombian representative to the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). Mr. Pinzón has been a member of several boards of directors of Colombian financial sector companies. He also was a law professor at Universidad Javeriana, Universidad de los Andes, as well as other universities. He has also published several legal articles. Mr. Pinzón earned a degree in law and a master’s degree in Philosophy from Universidad Javeriana. He was appointed as an independent Director.

 

98
 

 

Fabio Echeverri Correa (80) has been a member of our Board of Directors since September 16, 2002, and is its current Chairman. From 1957 to 1962, Mr. Echeverri served as President of Banco de Colombia and Banco Comercial Antioqueño. Since then, he has held various positions in the private and public sectors, serving as President of Siderurgica de Medellin and Director of the National Businessmen Association of Colombia (ANDI), the Latin American Association of Industries (AILA), and the Andean Confederation of Industries (CONANDI). He has been a member of the Inter-American Council of Commerce and Production for over 18 years. Mr. Echeverri is currently a member of the board of directors of the Shaio Clinic, Telecom-Colombia and Frigoríficos Ganaderos de Colombia S.A. During his career, Mr. Echeverri has been a chairman of the board of directors of Fondo Ganadero de Antioquia and the board of directors of Siemens S.A., among others. Mr. Echeverri earned a bachelor’s degree in economics from Universidad Jorge Tadeo Lozano. Mr. Echeverri was appointed as an independent director.

 

Joaquín Moreno Uribe (64) has been a member of our Board of Directors since March 27, 2008.  Mr. Moreno worked for 33 years for the Royal Dutch/Shell Group.  He has held various positions such as Project Manager in Colombia; Project and Operations Manager and Marketing and Operations Manager of Shell Química de Venezuela; Director of Marketing for Agrochemical Products and Global Marketing Manager for Petrochemical Products at Shell Centre–Shell International Chemicals Company in London; Director of Shell Venezuela S.A.; Director of Shell Colombia S.A., Director of Cerromatoso S.A., and Exploration and Production Business Economics and Strategic Planning Director for Europe and the Middle East at the Shell International Central offices in The Hague, the Netherlands.  Mr. Moreno has also served as Country Chairman and President for Shell in Mexico, Colombia and Venezuela, as well as Regional CEO for Downstream Oil Business in the Northern Latin American Region.  Mr. Moreno has been a member of the boards of directors of various local and international companies.  Mr. Moreno earned a degree in civil engineering from Universidad Industrial de Santander and completed a program in advanced management at Harvard University Business School in Cambridge, Massachusetts.  He was appointed as an independent Director.

 

Luis Carlos Villegas Echeverri (55) has been a member of our Board of Directors since March 22, 2012. Mr. Villegas has been President of the National Businessmen Association of Colombia or ANDI since 1996. Prior to his position as President of ANDI, he served as the Economic Advisor to the Colombian Embassy in France, Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs of Colombia, Governor of the Department of Risaralda, General Secretary of the National Federation of Coffee Growers of Colombia, and Senator. Mr. Villegas has served as a member of the boards of directors of several financial and industrial companies throughout Colombia. Mr. Villegas is also President of the National Council of Private Sector Associations and a board member of the International Organization of Employers. In 1999, Mr. Villegas was designated Chairman of the Board of the Fund for Reconstruction and Social Development of the “Eje Cafetero” region, overseeing all reconstruction efforts following the earthquake that hit the region in that year. Mr. Villegas earned a degree in law and social economics from the Universidad Javeriana and attended a graduate program on Public Administration at the University of Paris II. Mr. Villegas was appointed as an independent director.

 

Amilcar Acosta Medina (62) has been a member of our Board of Directors since his appointment at the extraordinary shareholders’ meeting held on August 3, 2011. From 2002 to 2004, he served as Advisor to the Office of the General Comptroller of the Republic. Mr. Acosta served in the Senate of Colombia from 1991 until 2002 and was the President of the Colombian Congress from July 1997 to July 1998. From 1990 to 1991, he served as Deputy Minister of Mines and Energy. He has held positions as a researcher and professor at several universities and published many books and research articles on economics and on the mines and energy sector. He has been a columnist for the leading newspapers of Colombia. Mr. Acosta earned a BA in Economics from the University of Antioquia. He was appointed by the shareholders’ meeting as an independent director representing the hydrocarbon producing departments of Colombia.

 

Roberto Steiner Sampedro (53) has been a member of our Board of Directors since October 12, 2011. Mr. Steiner is an associated researcher and former Executive Director of Fedesarrollo. He served as Alternate Executive Director of the International Monetary Fund from 2002 to 2007, Director of the Economics Research Department of the Central Bank of Colombia from October 1989 to April 1993, Director of the Economic Development Research Centre of Universidad de los Andes, Consultant at the World Bank from 1995 to 1996, Deputy Director of Fedesarrollo from 1993 to 1994, Deputy Director of the Economics Research Department of the Central Bank of Colombia from 1988 to 1989, and Senior Economist at the Central Bank of Colombia from 1986 to 1988. He was professor and researcher at various Colombian universities, including the Universidad de los Andes, Universidad Javeriana and Universidad Nacional. In 1995, he was a summer professor at Columbia University in New York. He has published several books, articles and research papers on economics. Mr. Steiner earned a degree in economics from Universidad de los Andes and M.A. and M.Phil degrees in economics from Columbia University in New York. Mr. Steiner was appointed by the shareholders’ meeting as an independent director representing the minority shareholders and currently serves as the audit committee financial expert.

 

99
 

 

Officers and Senior Management of Ecopetrol

 

In November 2012, our Board of Directors approved changes to our senior management’s structure adding one new position: Vice-President of E&P’s Technique and Development.

 

The following presents information concerning our executive officers and senior management.

 

Javier Gutiérrez (61) has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since January 22, 2007.  Prior to becoming our CEO, Mr. Gutiérrez served as CEO of Interconexión Eléctrica S.A. ESP (ISA) since 1992, where he started in the planning department in 1975.  Mr. Gutiérrez also worked as Vice-President of the Colombian Commission for Regional Electric Integration from 1995 to 1997.  In 2002, Mr. Gutiérrez received an award from the Portafolio economic journal as the “Best Enterprise Leader in Colombia.”  In 2005, the América Economía Journal granted Mr. Gutiérrez an award of excellence and in the same year, La República, a renowned financial journal in Colombia, ranked Mr. Gutiérrez among Colombia’s top 10 executives.  In 2008, Mr. Gutiérrez was recognized as the enterprise leader with the best reputation in Colombia by the Spanish Monitor of Corporate Reputation (MERCO).  Mr. Gutiérrez earned a degree in civil engineering and a master’s degree in industrial engineering from Universidad de los Andes and a specialization degree in finance from Universidad EAFIT.  Mr. Gutiérrez has worked as a part-time professor of statistics and research at Universidad de los Andes and as a professor of operational research at Universidad EAFIT.

 

Adriana M. Echeverri (42) joined Ecopetrol in 1994, and has served as our Chief Financial Officer since September 2006.  Prior to being appointed as our CFO, Mrs. Echeverri worked as Head of the Finance and Treasury Unit and Head of the Corporate Finance Unit.  She earned a degree in finance and foreign affairs and an MBA from Universidad Externado de Colombia.

 

Margarita Obregón (55) joined Ecopetrol in 2000 and has served as Secretary of the Board of Directors and as Secretary General since January 2008.  Prior to joining us, Mrs. Obregón worked in the supply department of Previsora S.A. Insurance Company, and as a legal advisor of lands for British Petroleum Company – BP, at Alvaro Rengifo y Cia. Mrs. Obregón also served as the head of the Business and Administration department of the Fiduciaria del Estado.  Mrs. Obregón earned a law degree from Colegio Mayor de Nuestra Señora del Rosario with specialization degrees in financial law and administration law.

 

Hector Manosalva (51) joined Ecopetrol in 1986 and serves as Production and Explorations Executive Vice-President. Mr. Manosalva is a petroleum engineer from the Universidad de América in Bogotá, and completed post-graduate studies in Finance at the Universidad EAFIT and in Executive Management at the Universidad de los Andes. Over the course of his career at Ecopetrol, Mr. Manosalva has served as Chief of Production, Head of the Planning Division, Production Manager of the Southern Region, Director of Corporate Social Responsibility, Advisor to the Office of the President of the Republic for the Protection of Energy Infrastructure and Production Manager of the Central Region.

 

Pedro A. Rosales (49) joined Ecopetrol in 1989, and has served as our Downstream Executive Vice-President since February 2008.  Mr. Rosales is responsible for the Company’s refining, petrochemicals, marketing and distribution, biofuels and gas businesses.  Mr. Rosales has held several positions in the Company within the areas of maintenance, operations, projects, planning and administration.  Prior to becoming our Downstream Executive Vice-President, Mr. Rosales served as our Vice-President of Transportation since January 2003 and as our Chief Operation Officer since 2006.  Mr. Rosales earned a degree in mechanical engineering and a MBA from Universidad de los Andes.

 

Hector Castaño (51) joined us in 1988 and has served as our Production Vice-President since 2011.  Mr. Castaño earned a degree in petroleum engineering from Universidad Nacional and a specialization degree in management from Universidad Sur Colombiana de Neiva.  He has held a number of positions in Ecopetrol, including Director of Production in the Central region, in the Southern region and in the Mid-Magdalena Valley region.

 

Enrique Velásquez (60) joined us in June 2008 and has served as our Exploration Vice-President since September 2010. Mr. Velasquez earned a degree in geology from Universidad Nacional, a specialization degree in financial management from Universidad EAN and a specialization degree in high management from Universidad de los Andes. In his 32 years of work experience, he has held a number of positions in oil and gas companies such as Oxy, Hocol, Sipetrol, Texaco, Exxon and Halliburton.

 

100
 

 

Rafael Guzmán (46) is the Vice-President of E&P’s Technique and Development and has over 17 years of experience in the oil and gas industry. He holds a BSc degree in petroleum engineering from Universidad America in Colombia, a MSc in petroleum engineering and a PhD in petroleum engineering with a minor in mathematics, all from Stanford University. Mr. Guzmán joined Ecopetrol in October 2010 as the Regional Manager. Prior to Ecopetrol, he worked with ENI and BP. Mr. Guzmán was awarded the SPE Ferguson Medal, the Ramey Fellowship at Stanford University and the Infantas award for innovation from ACIPET. He also served as SPE Colombian chapter president from 1995 to 1997.

 

Hernando Zerda (47) is the acting Vice-President of Growth and Strategy. Mr. Zerda has more than 18 years of experience in the oil and gas industry, mainly in international trade and strategy. During the past 12 years, he has worked in Ecopetrol, serving in the Vice-Presidency of Growth and Strategy. Mr. Zerda holds a B.A. in Chemical Engineering from Universidad América in Bogotá, a specialization in International Economics from Universidad Externado de Colombia and an MBA from Universidad de los Andes.

 

Federico Maya (48) has served as our Vice-President of Refining and Petrochemicals since December 2005.  Mr. Maya has held various positions at Ecopetrol over the last 20 years, including Marketing and Contract Coordinator for Ecopetrol’s Gas Department, Corporate Planning Directory member, and Vice-President of Supply and Marketing.  Mr. Maya earned a degree in chemical engineering from Pontificia Universidad Bolivariana and a specialization degree in marketing from Universidad EAFIT.

 

Claudia Castellanos (49) has served as our Vice-President of Supply and Marketing since 2009.  Mrs. Castellanos earned a degree in chemical engineering from Universidad Industrial de Santander and a specialization degree in energy resources management from Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga.  She has worked in Ecopetrol for over 25 years including positions as a process engineer at Refineria de Cartagena, where she also worked in the Economy Department.  Prior to becoming our Vice-President of Supply and Marketing, Mrs. Castellanos was Gas Manager for six years, where her focus was in the domestic and international commercialization of natural gas.

 

Jaime Bocanegra (44) is the acting Vice-President of Transportation since April 22, 2013. Mr. Bocanegra earned a degree in petroleum engineering from Universidad America in Colombia, a specialization degree in Management, a specialization degree in International Management of Oil and Gas Industry and Strategic Leadership. He was worked for Ecopetrol for the last 20 years and has held various positions within the Company, including Plant Coordinator, Multipurpose Pipelines Manager, Chief of Department, Program Manager of Dosquebradas and Chief of the Centralized Operations. Mr. Bocanegra is replacing Alvaro Castañeda who served as Vice-president of Tranportation for the last four years and who was named as Project Manager at our subsidiary Cenit.

 

Martha Cecilia Castaño (44) joined us in 2004 and has served as our Vice-President of Human Resources since 2008.  Prior to becoming our Human Resources Vice-President, Mrs. Castaño worked as Coordinator of Organizational Culture, Chief of the Leadership, Internal Communications and Cultural Unit and was also head of the Labor Relations Department.  Mrs. Castaño earned a degree in social communications and a specialization degree in economics from Universidad de la Sabana.  She has also worked in Acopi, El Tiempo, Uniandinos and Empresa de Telecomunicaciones de Bogotá (ETB), in several areas such as human resources management, corporate communications and labor relations.

 

Oscar Villadiego (48) joined us in 1986 and is currently serving as the Vice-President of HSE and Operational Sustainability. He served as Vice-President of Services and Technology since February 2008, until 2012. He has held several positions in the Production Vice-Presidency for crude oil reserves, development and the human resources unit. He served as manager for the Central region for a period of 2.5 years, and as Technical Manager for the Production Vice-Presidency for four years. Mr. Villadiego earned a degree in Petroleum Engineering from Universidad America in 1987.

 

Mauricio Echeverry (56) joined us in November 1999 and has served as our General Counsel since then.  Mr. Echeverry held the positions of Dean, Associate Dean and Professor at Universidad de los Andes Law School.  He was also Colombia’s Deputy General Prosecutor and Plenipotentiary Minister for Colombia’s Embassy in the US.  Mr. Echeverry earned a law degree and a specialization degree in commercial law from Universidad de los Andes.

 

Jaime Pineda (50) has served as our Director of Strategic Procurement since March 2012. He joined Ecopetrol in November 1989, working for the Legal Advisory Office in Barrancabermeja, and has served as our Head of Procurement Legal Advice Office from 2003 until 2012. He also serves as professor at Santo Tomas and Externado de Colombia universities. Mr. Pineda has a Law Degree from Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, and a specialization degree in public procurement from Universidad Santo Tomas and a contracting law degree from Universidad Externado de Colombia.

 

101
 

 

Néstor Saavedra (50) has served as our Vice-President of Innovation and Technology since September 2012. Mr. Saavedra earned a degree in petroleum engineering from Universidad Industrial de Santander and a master’s degree in petroleum engineering from Texas A&M. His work within the Company has included serving as Director of the Colombian Petroleum Institute of Ecopetrol, coordinating horizontal well technology and rock mechanics projects, as well as assessing and predicting the behavior of Colombian oil fields. Mr. Saavedra serves as Director of the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) in the South American and Caribbean Region.

 

Carlos Zamudio (48) has been the Director of Shared Services since August, 2012. Mr. Zamudio has more than 20 years of extensive experience in service delivery operations in multinational companies at regional and global levels. He previously worked at Belcorp, where he was the Corporate Director of the Shared Services Center overseeing 15 countries including the US and Brazil. He also worked at Procter & Gamble, where he was the Corporate Finance Manager for Chile, Brazil, Costa Rica and Colombia, as well as the Global Business Services Manager for the Latin America region.

 

Adriana M. Echeverri is first cousin of Luis Carlos Villegas Echeverri, a member of the Board of Directors. None of our other Directors or executive officers has any familial relationship with any other director or executive officer.

 

Compensation

 

The total compensation paid to our Directors, executive officers and senior management during 2012 amounted to Ps$14,974 million.

 

Based on a resolution adopted at our 2012 annual shareholders’ meeting, compensation for Directors for attendance at Board of Directors and/or committee meetings in person increased from the equivalent of four to six minimum monthly wage salaries, which totals approximately Ps$3,400,200 for 2012 and Ps$3,537,000 for 2013.  Fees for attendance at virtual meetings are set at 50% of the in-person meeting fee.

 

Our Directors are not eligible to receive pension and retirement benefits from us. The total amount set aside to provide pension and retirement benefits to our eligible executive officers totals Ps$16,917 million.

 

Share Ownership

 

No individual Director or executive officer beneficially owns more than 1% of our outstanding shares.

 

Board Practices

 

Our Board of Directors is composed of nine members and is responsible for, among other things, establishing our general business policies. According to Colombian law, the members of the Board of Directors must be elected at the annual shareholders’ meeting in accordance with a proportional representation system similar to cumulative voting (through an electoral quota voting system – The number of votes required to fill each position is calculated by dividing the number of possible votes by the number of open board positions) and may be reelected indefinitely. The members of the Board of Directors may be elected without an electoral quota voting system when there is unanimity. Pursuant to our bylaws, Directors are elected for a one-year term, and the positions are filled either by person or by position. Currently, we have three members appointed by their position: the Minister of Mines and Energy, the Minister of Finance and Public Credit and the Director of the National Planning Agency. Our current Directors were elected on March 21, 2013. Directors may be removed without cause at any moment by a majority of the shareholders present at a general shareholders’ meeting. Our executive officers are appointed by our Board of Directors.

 

The compensation of our Directors is set exclusively by the shareholders at the general shareholders’ meeting. See “—Compensation.”  Colombian law prohibits Directors from receiving corporate loans.  Directors are compensated for attending board meetings and committee meetings.  A Board meeting requires a quorum of at least five members and decisions are approved with a majority of the members present.  None of the contracts of any of our Directors contains provisions for benefits upon termination of such director’s services.

 

Under Colombian law, a director or executive officer must disclose during the general shareholders’ meeting any transaction involving a conflict of interest.  The general shareholders’ meeting may approve or reject the transaction giving rise to the conflict with the vote of the majority of the shares present at the shareholders’ meeting.  If the director or executive officer with a conflict is a shareholder, his or her vote will be excluded.  We disclose conflicts of interest of our employees, executive officers and directors in our Corporate Governance and Board of Directors reports.

 

102
 

 

Neither our bylaws nor our corporate governance code provide a maximum retirement age for our Directors. Under our bylaws, there is no requirement for a person to have a minimum number of shares to be considered as a Director. Colombian law provides that Directors willing to sell or purchase shares in our Company require a prior authorization of the Board of Directors. Colombian law does not impose any limitation as to the number of shares that may be acquired by a Director.

 

Pursuant to our bylaws, our Board of Directors has four committees (Audit Committee, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee, Nomination and Compensation Committee and Business Committee), which establish guidelines, set specific actions and evaluate and submit proposals designed to improve performance in the areas under their supervision and control. These committees are comprised by members of the Board of Directors and who are also appointed by the members of the Board of Directors. In addition to applicable regulations, the committees also have their own specific regulations that establish their purposes, duties and responsibilities.

 

Audit Committee (1)   Compensation and Nomination
Committee
  Corporate Governance and
Sustainability Committee
Joaquín Moreno Uribe   Fabio Echeverri Correa   Amilcar Acosta Medina
Roberto Steiner Sampedro   Minister of Finance and Public Credit   Joaquín Moreno Uribe
Amilcar Acosta Medina   Joaquín Moreno Uribe   Jorge Pinzón Sánchez

Luis Carlos Villegas Echeverri

Jorge Pinzón Sánchez

  Amilcar Acosta Medina   Roberto Steiner Sampedro
        Minister of Mines and Energy
        Minister of Finance and Public Credit
Business Committee        
Minister of Mines and Energy        
         
Minister of Finance and Public Credit        

Director of the National Planning Agency of Colombia

Luis Carlos Villegas Echeverri

       
Joaquín Moreno Uribe        
Roberto Steiner Sampedro        

 

 

(1) All members of our audit committee must be independent.

 

Audit Committee

 

Our audit committee, which must be comprised of at least three members, all of them independent Directors, is our highest internal control body and provides support to our Board of Directors in risk, accounting and financial matters.  It is in charge of guaranteeing the design, implementation and supervision of our internal control over financial reporting.  It also ratifies the annual hydrocarbons reserves report and provides support for our Board in analyzing topics related to financial matters, risks, control environment and assessment of the Company’s internal and external auditors.

 

All committee members are required to be knowledgeable in accounting matters and at least one of them is required to be an expert in financial and accounting matters. Roberto Steiner Sampedro currently serves as the audit committee financial expert.

 

Compensation and Nomination Committee

 

Our compensation and nomination committee, which must be comprised of at least three members, including at least one independent director, provides general guidelines for selection and compensation of our executive officers and employees.

 

Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee

 

Our corporate governance and sustainability committee, which must be comprised of at least three members, including at least one independent director, makes proposals to our Board of Directors to ensure and supervise the fulfillment of our good corporate governance and sustainability practices in accordance with our corporate governance code.

 

103
 

 

Business Committee

 

Our business committee, which must be comprised of at least five members, including at least one independent director, assists our Board in analyzing potential business ventures.  Based on its delegation of power, the committee studies and analyzes capital expenditure policies, major investment projects, strategy, new business and other matters that would help us move forward in our efforts toward the consolidation of our strategy. The primary criteria used in the committee’s decision-making are the optimization of our portfolio and the proper allocation of our resources.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2012, we had 9,701 employees.  A collective bargaining agreement between us and our three main labor unions (USO, ADECO and SINDISPETROL) governs the labor relations we have with our unionized employees, which amounted to 2,230 employees as of December 31, 2012.  It also governs the labor relations with the 1,225 non-unionized employees that agreed to abide by it after asking to be waived of the Agreement 01 of 1977. Agreement 01 of 1977 governs the labor relations of our employees devoted to technical and trustworthy activities, which numbered 4,632 employees in Ecopetrol S.A. as of December 31, 2012.  The collective bargaining agreement and Agreement 01 of 1977 do not vary significantly in benefits.  Employees are subject to Law 100 of 1993 with respect to their retirement scheme.

 

Most of our employees are located in Colombia. In order to support our corporate growth strategy, we increased the total number of Ecopetrol S.A. employees by 10.7% from 7,303 in 2011 to 8,087 in 2012. The table below presents the breakdown of Ecopetrol S.A.’s employees according to the business segments where they work, and the personnel of our subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. As of December 31, 2012, Ecopetrol had 8 direct employees working abroad.

 

    As December 31,  
Ecopetrol S.A.  

2012 (1)

    2011     2010  
Exploration and Production                        
Exploration     174       130       133  
Production     1,725       1,565       1,460  
Others     386       309       283  
Total Exploration and Production     2,285       2,004       1,876  
Downstream                        
Refining     2,425       2,134       2,000  
Marketing     181       175       159  
Others     16       18       17  
Total Downstream     2,622       2,327       2,176  
Transport     1,097       964       856  
Corporate     2,083       2,008       1,836  
TOTAL ECOPETROL S.A.     8,087       7,303       6,744  
Ecopetrol America Inc.     28       14       10  
Bioenergy S.A.     143       102       83  
Bioenergy Zona Franca S.A.S.     35       23       19  
Hocol S.A.     194       202       192  
Equion Energia Limited     493       465       -  
Oleoducto Central S.A.     133       133       133  
Oleoducto de Colombia S.A.     1       1       1  
Oleoducto de los Llanos S.A.     17       19       17  
Oleoducto Bicentenario de Colombia S.A.S.     27       19       -  
Ecopetrol del Perú S.A.     12       12       6  
Refinería de Cartagena S.A.     158       142       122  
Ecopetrol Oleo e Gas do Brasil Ltda.     14       10       3  
Propilco S.A.     339       325       286  
Cenit     20       -       -  
TOTAL (2)     9,701       8,770       7,616  

 

 

(1) 353 persons employed by us during 2012 were not included in our 2012 employee statistics as they were independent contractors, involved in non-regular activities and do not classify as temporary employees.
(2) Totals are as of the last day of each year.

 

104
 

 

During 2012, Ecopetrol S.A. had 833 temporary employees, an increase of 45% compared to 2011. In 2011 and 2010, Ecopetrol S.A. had 574 and 379 temporary employees, respectively.

 

Labor Unions

 

We currently have three industry-wide labor unions and one company labor union:

 

· Unión Sindical Obrera de la Industria del Petróleo — USO (Industry labor union);

 

· Asociación de Directivos Profesionales, Técnicos y Trabajadores de las Empresas de la Rama de Actividad Económica del Recurso Natural del Petróleo y sus Derivados de Colombia — ADECO (Industry labor union);

 

· Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de Empresas Operadoras, Contratistas, Subcontratistas de Servicios y Actividades de la Industria del Petróleo y Similares — SINDISPETROL (Industry labor union); and

 

· Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de Ecopetrol — SINCOPETROL (Company labor union).

 

Currently ECOPETROL does not have any workers in the SINCOPETROL union. This union did not participate in the negotiation exercise.

 

Our employees and any employee working for any company in the oil and gas industry may join the USO, ADECO or Sindispetrol. Sincopetrol may only be joined by our employees.

 

On August 2, 2011 and November 8, 2011, we experienced two work stoppages promoted by the USO in Barrancabermeja to support workers protesting at an unaffiliated oil and gas exploration and production company, Pacific Rubiales Energy. After our subsidiary Cenit was created on June 15, 2012, some workers (members of the USO) protested on June 19 and December 22, 2012. These protests did not affect our operations.

 

Typically, union protests do not impact our operations because, as soon as they occur, we implement our continuity plan and integrate other trained workers that can operate in emergency situations.

 

Ecopetrol’s current transportation contracts were transferred to Cenit, in connection with the previous agreement. See “Item 4. Overview by Business Segment—Transportation and Logistics—Cenit. There is no change in working conditions contemplated for employees who currently work at the transport segment of the Company.

 

On August 22, 2009, as a result of consensual negotiations, we entered into a five-year collective bargaining agreement with USO, ADECO and Sindispetrol. During the first quarter of 2012, we held meetings with the unions to discuss revisions to the collective bargaining agreement signed in 2009. The meetings were carried out under normal conditions and did not affect our operations. During these meetings, we analyzed certain articles of the collective bargaining agreement to clarify ambiguities as well as those that became outdated after the Company became public. The aspects that were analyzed during the revision process were, among others, union rights, health care benefits and food and transportation allowances.

 

Benefits and wages will be reviewed once the collective bargaining agreement expires in 2014. The following are the key terms of the agreement currently in effect since 2009 until June 2014.

 

· Transportation Subsidy .  Monthly transportation subsidy depends on the employee’s location and ranges between Ps$1,292 and Ps$138,557.

 

· Food Subsidy .  Monthly food subsidy ranges between Ps$258,390 and Ps$299,010 depending on the employee’s location.

 

· Lodging Subsidy .  Monthly lodging subsidy to employees is Ps$205,564.

 

· Education Subsidy .  Subsidy that covers 90% of tuition and board expenses and fixed amounts of transportation and textbooks for our employees and their children.

 

105
 

 

· Health Benefits .  Ecopetrol pays 100% of medical expenses for workers and their families. The health benefits include integral basic attention, programs in prevention of diseases, the supply of medicines and others.

 

· Six months Bonus. Ecopetrol pays 48 days of regular wage to its workers; 24 days in June and 24 in December.

 

· Stability Clause .  Employees who, as of December 1, 2004 had worked over 16 months, cannot be fired without just cause.

 

· Retirement plan for employees .  Employees hired after January 29, 2003 are not covered by our retirement scheme but are covered by the national social security system.

 

· Five-year bonus .  A cash benefit bonus accrues on a yearly basis and is paid for every 5-year period an employee works in the Company according to the following scale:

 

5 years worked: Bonus equivalent to 9 days of basic payment plus Ps$193,990
   
10 years worked: Bonus equivalent to 14 days of basic payment plus Ps$193,990
   
15 years worked: Bonus equivalent to 19 days of basic payment plus Ps$193,990
   
20 years worked: Bonus equivalent to 24 days of basic payment plus Ps$193,990
   
25 years worked: Bonus equivalent to 29 days of basic payment plus Ps$193,990
   
30 years worked: Bonus equivalent to 34 days of basic payment plus Ps$193,990

 

Labor Relations

 

As part of our goal to improve workplace morale, in 2010 we implemented a number of initiatives to maintain good and trustworthy relations with our employees, guarantee competitive wages, strengthen our corporate principles and culture, provide opportunities for personal development and improve the general welfare of our employees.  Our initiatives also sought to strengthen communication processes and to implement performance-based compensation.

 

To improve the quality of life of our employees, we extend various types of loans to them, including housing loans and general-purpose loans.  In 2012, we extended 1,043 house loans for a total of Ps$106 billion and 1,169 general-purpose loans for a total of Ps$1.1 billion.  We also provided on-site and external training and development courses to our employees.  At December 31, 2012, our investments in employees’ development amounted to Ps$31.6 billion and we extended a total of Ps$67 billion in subsidies for education.

 

Labor Regulation

 

Since November 13, 2007, all of our employees are official employees as a result of our transformation into a mixed economy company.  Therefore, our employees are governed by the provisions of the Colombian Labor Code since then.

 

106
 

 

ITEM 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

 

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

 

The following table sets forth the names of our major shareholders, and the number of shares and the percentage of outstanding shares owned by them at March 31, 2013:

 

    At March 31, 2013  
Shareholders   Number of shares     % Ownership  
Nation - Ministry of Finance and Public Credit     36,384,788,817       88.49 %
Public float     4,731,909,639       11.51 %
Total     41,116,698,456       100.00 %

 

All our common shares have identical voting rights.

 

As of March 31, 2013, 1.215% of our common shares were held of record in the form of American Depository Shares.  As of February 22, 2013, we had 18 registered holders and 23,352 beneficiaries of common shares, or ADSs representing common shares, in the United States .

 

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

Agreements

 

We engage in a variety of transactions with related parties in the ordinary course of business. Set forth below is a description of material related party transactions. For additional information about transactions with related parties, see Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Ocensa

 

We have entered into the following agreements with Ocensa:

 

· In March 1995, we entered into an agreement for the transportation of crude oil through the Ocensa pipeline. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, we were required to make monthly payments that vary depending on the volumes of crude oil we transported through the pipeline and a tariff calculated by Ocensa on the basis of Ocensa’s financial projections and their expected volumes of crude oil. In 2012, payments made by us under this agreement amounted to US$290.42 million. On January 17, 2013, this agreement was amended as a result of Ocensa’s new business model. Among other changes, this amendment to the transportation agreement establishes the payment of the tariff calculated according to the Resolutions issued in 2010 by the Ministry of Mines and Energy.

 

· On January 17, 2013, the Amended and Restated Oleoducto Central Agreement (AROCA) and other agreements derived from it were terminated by mutual consent among the parties. On the same date January 17, 2013, the shareholders and Ocensa entered into a new shareholders agreement that establishes the basis for a new business model, pursuant to which Ocensa will be a profit center instead of a cost center.

 

· In December 1995, we leased the Porvenir and Miraflores terminals to Ocensa. Pursuant to the terms of the lease agreement we received monthly payments during 2012 of approximately US$8,598,266 plus applicable taxes. The duration of this agreement is indefinite.

 

· In November 1996, we leased the Cravo Norte dock to Ocensa. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we received monthly payments during 2012 of US$23,000, plus applicable taxes. The duration of this agreement is indefinite.

 

· In September 1999, we entered into a joint operation agreement for the TLU-3 Coveñas buoy with Ocensa and ODC. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement we are required to make monthly payments of a fixed amount of US$75,000 plus a variable amount depending of the volumes exported through the buoy. There have not been variable payments in the last three years. The duration of this agreement is indefinite.

 

107
 

 

· In December 1999, we entered into an operation and maintenance agreement for the Porvenir, Miraflores and Vasconia pumping stations. In 2012, pursuant to the terms of this agreement, we received monthly payments of approximately US$677,326 plus applicable taxes and variable costs in 2012. This agreement was renewed for a five-year term on April 1, 2011.

 

· In December 2004, we entered into a natural gas supply contract pursuant to which we receive variable monthly payments based on the volumes of natural gas delivered and a fixed tariff. During 2012, we received monthly payments of approximately US$99,228 under this contract.

 

Ocensa has entered into the following agreements with some of our subsidiaries:

 

· In March 1995, Equion Energia Limited and Santiago Oil Company entered into an agreement for the transportation of crude oil through the Oleoducto Central S.A. (Ocensa) pipeline. In November 2012,  Equion Energia Limited and Santiago Oil Company transferred, by means of various transactions its shares (24.8%) and transportation rights (19.8%) holdings in the Ocensa pipeline to wholly-owned subsidiaries of Ecopetrol S.A. (51%) and Talisman (49%). Equion kept 5% of transportation rights in Ocensa. In 2012, the transportation fees billed by Ocensa were: Equion Energia Limited (US$7.5 million), Santiago Oil Company (US$1.3 million) and Hocol and Homcol (US$18.5 million).

 

· On January 3, 2013, the Technical Services and Management Agreement ( Contrato de Servicios Técnicos y Administrativos ) between Ecopetrol and Ocensa was terminated by mutual consent.

 

Oleoducto de Colombia S.A.

 

We entered into the following agreements with ODC:

 

· In July 1992, we entered into a take-and-pay agreement for the transportation of hydrocarbons. Pursuant to this agreement, we must pay a previously agreed tariff over the volume of hydrocarbons transported. The duration of this agreement is indefinite.

 

· In August 1992, we entered into an operation and maintenance agreement for the Vasconia and Coveñas terminals. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, ODC is required to make payments of approximately US$1.5 million per year plus any other expenses incurred by us in the performance of the agreement, including a variable surcharge between 5% and 12% on such expenses, plus any applicable taxes. The duration of this agreement is indefinite.

 

· In July 2006, we entered into an operation and maintenance agreement for the Caucasia Station and the Vasconia-Coveñas pipeline system. Since 2010, this agreement is only in effect for the operation of the Caucasia Station. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, we received payments of approximately US$704,065 per year, plus any other expenses incurred by us for the performance of the agreement, including a variable surcharge of between 5% and 12% on such expenses, plus any applicable taxes. The duration of this agreement is indefinite.

 

· In March 2007, we entered into a service agreement to guarantee the protection and safety of the Cusiana Coveñas and Vasconia Coveñas pipeline systems. Under the terms of this agreement, ODC paid us Ps$51 million per year. This agreement expired on December 31, 2011.

 

Refinería de Cartagena S.A.

 

· In April 2007, we entered into a maintenance and administration agreement with Reficar, our wholly-owned subsidiary as of May 2009. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, we provided Reficar with maintenance and administration services in exchange for a monthly fee. This agreement expired in April 2011, but was extended through the term of our negotiations.

 

· On November 29, 2010, Ecopetrol S.A. entered into a Peso-denominated loan facility with Reficar for an amount in Pesos equivalent to US$1 billion to finance capital expenditures and construction costs in connection with a project to modernize Reficar’s refinery. Ecopetrol S.A. disbursed the equivalent of US$591 million in Pesos and amended the agreement to reduce the commitment amount to US$600 million. The interest rate for the US$591 million Peso-equivalent loan is the DTF as of December 31 of the year before each annual period. On September 26, 2011, Reficar and Ecopetrol Capital A.G. executed a new long-term U.S. dollar-denominated subordinated loan agreement for up to US$400 million also to finance capital expenditures and construction costs in connection with the project to modernize Reficar’s refinery. Ecopetrol Capital A.G. disbursed the US$400 million under this new subordinated loan agreement in 2011. The interest rate for this subordinated loan is 6 months LIBOR plus 4.775% per annum.

 

108
 

 

· In December 2011, we executed an agreement that governs the composition of the crude slate that the refinery processes, its purchase of crude and other products, and its sale of refining products. Additionally, in January 2012, we executed a new operations and maintenance contract. These contracts replaced the old maintenance and administration services contract. The fees billed to Reficar during 2012 under these contracts were approximately Ps$73.7 billion.

 

· In December 2011, we entered into a construction support agreement and a debt service guarantee agreement to guarantee certain obligations of Reficar under the US$3.5 billion project finance for the expansion and modernization of its facilities. Pursuant to the terms of the construction support agreement, Ecopetrol S.A. agreed to support Reficar’s costs and expenses related to overcost and delays in construction. Pursuant to the terms of the debt service guarantee agreement, Ecopetrol S.A. provided Reficar with a liquidity mechanism to pay its debt service shortfalls and a mechanism to exit the project financing by transferring its debt to us. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.” In June 2011, Ecopetrol Capital A.G. granted a US$240 million treasury loan to Reficar to finance delayed subsidy payments from the Nation. The interest rate for this loan is 2.10% per year. In December 2011, the Government paid US$198 million to Reficar for accrued subsidies, and Reficar used the entire amount to repay principal and interest on the treasury loan. As of December 31, 2011, the amount outstanding under this loan was US$45 million.

 

· On February 1, 2012, we entered into a crude oil supply contract with Reficar for a period of five years. Pursuant to the terms of this contract, Reficar has the option to purchase up to 200 thousand bpd of crude oil from our Caño Limón, Vasconia Blend and Castilla blends. This contract includes an option for Reficar to receive from Ecopetrol crude oil we have bought from other national producers or imported from foreign producers on behalf of Reficar.

 

Oleoducto de los Llanos Orientales

 

We have entered into two ship-or-pay agreements with ODL:

 

· In March 2009, we entered into a ship-or-pay agreement with ODL that establishes a financing tariff used to pay ODL’s indebtedness to Grupo Aval for five years. This agreement was superseded by a new contract executed in May 2010, with a seven-year term, to reflect new conditions agreed with Grupo Aval. This financing tariff is collected through a trust fund, which in turn is responsible for making the debt service payments to Grupo Aval. Under this agreement, ODL has committed to transport 75 thousand bpd during the two-year grace period of the facility and 90 thousand bpd during the remaining five years. Ecopetrol is responsible for 65% of this capacity.

 

· In September 2009, we entered into a second ship-or-pay agreement with ODL that establishes a financing tariff collected through a trust fund that in turn is responsible for making debt service payments to security holders. Under this agreement, ODL committed to transport 19.5 thousand bpd during the first phase of the ODL project (which began in September 2009 and ended in the first quarter of 2010) and 39 thousand bpd upon commencement of the second phase of the ODL project which occurred in the first quarter of 2010.

 

· In December 2009, we entered into a service agreement with ODL to transport crude oil. This agreement expires in June 2016 and can be renewed. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, in 2012 we made monthly payments totaling Ps$176 billion for the year.

 

· In March 2010, we entered into a pipeline operating and maintenance agreement with ODL. This agreement has a five-year term and the amount payable to us for the entire term of the agreement is Ps$56.4 billion, plus any applicable taxes.

 

· In March 2010, we entered into an undiluted crude oil supply agreement, which was renewed in March, May and November 2012 until December 2013. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, in 2012 ODL paid us Ps$20.3 billion plus applicable taxes.

 

109
 

 

Oleoducto Bicentenario de Colombia S.A.S.

 

· In November 2011, we signed a five-year technical assistance services contract for the construction of the Araguaney Covenas pipeline. This contract is part of the project construction and the amount payable to us for the entire term of the agreement is approximately Ps$8.8 billion.

 

· In November 2011, we entered into an operation and maintenance agreement for the Banadia unloading facility. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we receive monthly payments of approximately Ps$128.9 million plus applicable taxes. The duration of this agreement is 15 years.

 

· In June 2012, we entered into ship-or-pay and ship-and-pay crude oil transportation agreements with Oleoducto Bicentenario that establishes a price, which requires the payment of Bicentenario’s indebtedness to local banks for twelve years. This tariff is collected through a trust, which in turn is responsible for making the debt service payments to the banks. The duration of the ship-or-pay agreement is 12 years or when the credit has been entirely paid, and the duration of the ship-and-pay agreement is 20 years after the ship-or-pay terminates. Under these agreements, Bicentenario has committed to transport at least 110 thousand bpd, of which the 55% of the agreement volume is provided directly by Ecopetrol and 0.97% indirectly by Hocol. In June 2012, we entered into storage-or-pay and storage-and pay agreements with Oleoducto Bicentenario. Under these agreements, Bicentenario is committed to receive, store, preserve and deliver our crude oil. The storage-or-pay agreement will terminate when Bicentenario’s indebtedness to local banks has been entirely paid, and the duration of the storage-and-pay agreement is 20 years after the storage-or-pay agreement terminates.

 

· In August 2012, we entered into an Operation and Maintenance agreement for the Arguaney – Banadia pipeline system. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, we will receive payments of approximately Ps$3.5 billion in the first year and approximately Ps$18.6 billion per year thereafter. The duration of this agreement is 15 years.

 

Andean Chemicals Ltd.

 

· In May 2009 we granted a loan to our subsidiary, Andean Chemicals Ltd., for the acquisition from Glencore International A.G. of its 51% interest in Reficar, in the amount of US$541 million for a five year term. The interest rate for each year was the DTF, applicable at December 31 of the previous year. In December 2011, we capitalized this loan, for a total amount of US$615.7 million (capital and interest).

 

Compounding and Masterbatching Industry Ltda. ¾ COMAI

 

· In 2008 we entered into a contract with COMAI for the delivery of refinery grade propylene through January 2018. COMAI operates a splitter to separate refinery-grade propylene into polymer-grade propylene and propane. Refinery grade propylene is sold by COMAI to Propilco who uses it as raw material in the production of polypropylene, while propane is delivered back to us.

 

Cenit

 

· On October 1, 2012 we entered into an Asset Contribution Agreement, establishing the terms and conditions under which Ecopetrol contributed to Cenit its shares in companies engaged in oil transport, and on April 1, 2013, under this agreement Ecopetrol contributed to Cenit its assets for the transportation of hydrocarbons and derivatives. This agreement has a term of 30 years.

 

On April 1, 2013 we entered into the following agreements with Cenit:

 

· Projects and Transport Logistic Solutions Service Agreement, under which we will provide management services to Cenit for a term of 15 years.

 

· Operation and Maintenance Agreement for the operation, maintenance, emergency and disaster risk management, among other services, which we will provide for a term of 15 years.

 

· Service Agreement for the provision of comprehensive services by Cenit for the transport, storage loading and unloading of hydrocarbons for a term of 30 years.

 

110
 

 

· Service Agreement for the provision of comprehensive services by Cenit for the transport, storage loading and unloading of refined products for a term of 30 years.

 

Other Agreements

 

· We entered into a supply agreement with Ecodiesel a company in which we have a 50% equity interest. This agreement has been operative since August 1, 2010. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, Ecodiesel must deliver to us and we must purchase from Ecodiesel at least 80% of Ecodiesel’s biodiesel production each month. Payments vary depending on the purchased volumes of biodiesel. This agreement expires on December 31, 2017.

 

· In 2010, we renewed the service agreement with Societal Colombiana de Servicios Mortuaries S.A., or Serviport, a company in which we had a 49% equity interest through September 30, 2012. Since October 1, 2012, our equity ownership passed to Cenit. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, Serviport assists us in our maritime operations in Coveñas port. This agreement expires on May 27, 2019.

 

Transactions with Other State-Controlled Entities

 

We are a state-controlled oil and gas company and operate in an industry regulated by governmental authorities, agencies and other organizations.

 

In the ordinary course of business we enter into transactions with other state-owned entities that include but are not limited to the following:

 

· selling and purchasing goods, including crude oil purchases of ANH royalties;

 

· properties and other assets;

 

· rendering and receiving services;

 

· leasing assets;

 

· depositing and borrowing money; and

 

· using public utilities.

 

Purchases of Hydrocarbons

 

These transactions are conducted in the ordinary course of business on terms comparable to the terms of transactions with private parties. We have also established procurement policies and approval processes for purchases of products and services, which do not depend on whether the counterparties are state-owned entities or not.

 

Loans to our Employees

 

We extend loans to all of our employees as part of our compensation scheme. We grant loans for housing and general purposes.  The Human Resources and Strategy vice-presidents along with the compensation manager are part of the housing loans committee that is in charge of approving housing loans to employees.  The principal amount of the loan depends on the applicant’s tenure and cannot exceed 59 times the applicant’s monthly salary.  We do not guarantee any loans made by third parties.

 

Other than maintaining housing loans to some executive officers, which were in place prior to the registration of our ADSs, since registering our ADSs, neither us nor any of our subsidiaries have provided loans (including housing loans), extended or maintained credit, arranged for the extension of credit, or renewed an extension of credit, in the form of a personal loan to or for any of our executive officers.  We have not materially modified any term of any such extension of credit or renewed any such extension of credit, in each case including the aforementioned housing loans, since our ADSs were registered.

 

In addition, other than the housing loans referred to below, neither us, nor any of our subsidiaries will provide loans (including housing loans), extend or maintain credit, arrange for the extension of credit, or renew an extension of credit, in the form of a personal loan to or for any of our executive officers in the future.  In addition, we will not materially modify any term of any such extension of credit or renew any such extension of credit, in each case including the aforementioned housing loans, in the future. We do not extend loans to Directors.

 

111
 

 

The following table sets forth a description of the loans outstanding to our executive officers as of March 31, 2013 (figures in millions of Colombian pesos).

 

    Nature of the   Principal     Amount     Largest Amount            
    Loan and Date   Amount of     Outstanding at     Outstanding     Termination     Applicable
Executive Officer   of Disbursement   the Loan     December 31, 2012     during period     Date     Interest Rate
Javier G. Gutiérrez   Housing, June 2008     729.0       565.8       729.0     June 2028     UVR (1)
Adriana M. Echeverri   Housing, December 2002     37.5       29.0       45.1     October 2018     UVR (1)
Pedro A. Rosales   Housing,  December 2003     231.9       133.4       247.5     December 2018     UVR (1)
Oscar Villadiego (2)   Housing, January 2001     78.0       7.1       78.0     January 2016     UVR (1)
Nestor Saavedra (3)   Housing, October 2007     134.1       95.5       134.1     October 2022     UVR (1)

 

(1) As the regulatory entity for these purposes, the Central Bank of Colombia (Banco de la República) defines the term “UVR” as Unidad de Valor Real (Real Value Unit), an accounting unit which reflects purchasing power based exclusively on the consumer price index variation certified by the National Statistics Department of Colombia (DANE). The UVR is used to calculate the cost of housing credits in Colombia. This accounting unit allows financial entities to adjust credit values to the cost of living increase in Colombia.
(2) Oscar Villadiego became an executive officer in March 2012 as a consequence of the reorganization of our senior management’s structure approved by our Board of Directors. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees–Officers and Senior Management of Ecopetrol.”

(3) Néstor Saavedra became an executive officer in September 2012.

 

112
 

 

ITEM 8 . Financial Information

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Our annual consolidated financial statements are filed as part of this annual report starting on page F-1.

 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

We are party to various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business.  Other than as disclosed in this annual report, we are not currently involved in any litigation or arbitration proceeding, including any proceeding that is pending or threatened of which we are aware, which we believe will have a material adverse effect on our Company.  Other legal proceedings that are pending against or involve us and our subsidiaries are incidental to the conduct of our and their business.  We believe that the ultimate disposition of such other proceedings individually or in an aggregate basis will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

 

As of December 31, 2012, we were a party to 2,658 legal proceedings relating to civil, administrative, environmental, tax and labor claims filed against us in the Colombian courts and arbitration tribunals of which 659 had an accrual provision. We allocate sufficient amounts of money and time to defend these claims. Historically, we have been successful in defending lawsuits filed against us. Based on the advice of our legal advisors it is reasonable to assume that the litigation procedures brought against us will not materially affect our financial position or solvency regardless of the outcome. See Note 31 to our annual consolidated financial statements included in this annual report for a discussion of our legal proceedings.

 

In December 2010, Llanos Oil Exploration Ltd., or Llanos Oil, filed a lawsuit against us in a district court of the Netherlands before The Court of The Hague which, if decided against us, could materially affect our financial condition. The complaint alleges early termination by us of the following exploration activity contracts: the 1997 Las Nieves Association Contract and the 2002 Guatapurí Association Contract. These contracts were terminated because of the default by Llanos Oil on July 28, 2000, and July 23, 2003, respectively, in accordance with the provisions of the contracts. In the incidental proceedings judgment of May 30, 2012, the district court in The Hague ruled that it lacks jurisdiction to hear the case and rejected all the legal grounds of the plea of Llanos Oil regarding the jurisdiction of the court. Llanos Oil appealed on August 2012 and the decision on appeal is expected during the second quarter of 2013. We have not created a provision for this claim because our legal counsel in The Hague considers the probability of success for Llanos Oil to be remote.

 

On April 16, 2012, we were served with a class action suit against us seeking monetary damages of approximately Ps$85,936 billion related to the December 2011 Caño Limon – Coveñas Crude Oil Pipeline Spill. See “Item 4. Overview by Business Segment—Transportation and Logistics—Caño Limon – Coveñas Crude Oil Pipeline Spill.” The Colombian Attorney General’s Office filed a motion requesting the judge to require the claimant to justify the amount. The claimant reduced the claim to Ps$11 billion. However, the court appraised the damages to be at the most Ps$298 million based on the number of people involved in the class action. The court set the date of the conciliation hearing for October 23, 2012 but the claimant did not attend and instead requested the court to set a new date for the settlement hearing. The court declined the request and decided to continue with the proceeding. As of the date of this annual report the evidence phase is pending. Our legal counsel is of the view that this class action suit has only a remote possibility of success.

 

Foncoeco

 

An association of former employees known by the acronym Foncoeco brought an action against us in connection with a company profit-sharing plan offered in 1962 that expired in 1975.  The plaintiffs claim that our Board of Directors had set aside a specific amount under the profit sharing plan, which was not entirely distributed to employees eligible under the plan. The court of first instance ruled on June 25, 2002 in our favor and rejected the plaintiffs’ arguments.  The plaintiffs appealed the ruling to the Bogota Higher Tribunal, which ordered us to present a rendición de cuentas (an accounting action) to the first instance judge based on the amounts allocated by our Board of Directors.  Based on the judge’s conclusion with respect to our accounting and the expert testimony of a witness presented by the plaintiffs, who we maintain included amounts never allocated by our Board of Directors to the profit sharing plan, the first instance judge, in 2005, ordered us to pay Ps$541,833 million, or approximately US$260 million.  We appealed the decision by the first instance judge to the Bogota Higher Tribunal and on June 22 2011, the court ruled in our favor and reduced the amount we must pay to Ps$6.6 million, or approximately US$3,707. On March 14, 2012, the Colombian Supreme Court of Justice permitted an extraordinary appeal filed by the plaintiffs. Ecopetrol filed its reply on May 18, 2012 and the appeal is currently in the evidence phase. As of the date of this annual report, the Colombian Supreme Court of Justice has not decided the extraordinary appeal. Our legal counsel is of the view that the appeal has a remote possibility of success.

 

113
 

 

DIVIDENDS

 

We do not have a dividend policy. Pursuant to Colombian law, we may distribute dividends to our shareholders. Our Board of Directors may propose a dividend, which declaration, amount and payment per share is subject to approval by a simple majority of the shareholders. In 2010, 2011 and 2012 the shareholders approved the distribution of 71.8%, 70.3% and 79.9% of 2009, 2010 and 2011 of net income, respectively. On March 21, 2013, our shareholders at the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting approved an ordinary dividend of 70.9% plus an extraordinary dividend of 10% of net income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Use of Funds—Dividends.”

 

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

 

Except as discussed in “Item 4. Overview by Business Segment—Transportation and Logistics” related to the incorporation of Cenit as our wholly-owned subsidiary and the transfer of assets to it, there have not been any significant changes since the date of our annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

114
 

 

ITEM 9. The Offer and Listing

 

TRADING MARKETS

 

In August 2007, we conducted an initial public offering of 10.1% of our common shares in Colombia. As a result of such offering, our common shares have traded on the BVC since November 2007 under the symbol “ECOPETROL.” Our ADSs, representing 20 common shares, have been traded on the NYSE under the symbol “EC” since September 2008. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. serves as depositary for our ADSs.

 

Since August 2010, our ADSs have been traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “ECP.”

 

The second round of the equity offering program took place between July 27 and August 17, 2011. The offer was directed exclusively to investors in Colombia as permitted by Law 1118 of 2006. A total of 644,185,868 shares were allotted, equivalent to approximately Ps$2.38 trillion. Out of the 219,054 investors participating in this round, 73% were new stockholders. In addition, 87% of the offering was allocated to retail investors and the remaining 13% to institutional investors. Funds obtained by us through this offering were allocated to the company’s investment plan.

 

In the future, the Nation – Ministry of Finance and Public Credit, as our controlling shareholder, may make decisions or announcements about its intention to sell part of its holding of our capital stock, as it has announced in recent years. We understand that our cooperation is necessary for the successful coordination of the Nation’s process.

 

The following table sets forth reported high and low closing prices in Pesos for our shares and the reported average daily trading volume of our shares on the BVC for the periods indicated. The table also sets forth information on the trading price of our shares in Pesos and U.S. dollars, as well as the average trading volume.

 

    Shares Traded on the BVC  
                            Average number of  
    Pesos per share    

U.S. dollars per share (1)

    shares traded  
    High     Low     High     Low     per day  
2008     2,895       1,575       1.6638       0.7647       21,063,806  
2009     2,815       1,990       1.4707       0.7833       10,245,002  
2010     4,660       2,370       2.5582       1.1958       8,764,023  
2011     4,300       3,575       2.2823       1.9466       6,750,979  
2012     5,850       4,200       3.3236       2.1619       8,396,801  
                                         
Most recent quarters                                        
                                         
First quarter 2011     4,060       3,750       2.1774       1.9805       5,983,470  
Second quarter 2011     4,045       3,605       2.2823       1.9964       5,769,997  
Third quarter 2011     4,135       3,575       2.2689       1.9967       8,029,866  
Fourth quarter 2011     4,300       3,755       2.2342       1.9466       7,105,117  
First quarter 2012     5,480       4,200       3.0963       2.1619       11,929,722  
Second quarter 2012     5,850       4,850       3.3236       2.7133       9,823,519  
Third quarter 2012     5,430       4,870       2.9820       2.7096       6,398,774  
Fourth quarter 2012     5,790       5,140       3.1866       2.8253       5,480,062  
First quarter 2013     5,710       4,895       3.2091       2.7050       6,608,557  
                                         
Most recent six months                                        
                                         
October 2012     5,790       5,270       3.1866       2.9269       6,517,472  
November 2012     5,360       5,140       2.9519       2.8253       4,982,031  
December 2012     5,500       5,200       3.1047       2.8673       4,865,598  
January 2013     5,650       5,430       3.1863       3.0645       4,956,770  
February 2013     5,710       5,190       3.2091       2.8683       8,243,934  
March 2013     5,200       4,895       2.8662       2.7050       6,860,155  
April 2013 (through April 26)     5,020       4,225       2.7447       2.3115       10,471,473  

 

 

(1) U.S. dollars per common share translated at the Representative Market Exchange Rate for each period.

 

115
 

 

The following table sets forth reported high and low closing prices in U.S. dollars for our ADSs and the average daily trading volume of our ADSs on the NYSE for the periods indicated. The table also sets forth information on the trading price of our ADSs in U.S. dollars, as well as the average trading volume.

 

    ADSs Traded on NYSE  
   

U.S. dollars per ADS (1)

    Average number of ADSs  
    High     Low     traded per day  
2008     27.25       15.04       42,074  
2009     29.99       15.31       48,289  
2010     51.92       23.60       163,749  
2011     46.00       38.47       357,289  
2012     67.48       44.52       551,410  
                         
Most recent quarters                        
                         
First quarter 2011     43.81       39.54       289,293  
Second quarter 2011     46.00       39.66       337,737  
Third quarter 2011     45.53       39.31       469,033  
Fourth quarter 2011     44.70       38.47       327,033  
First quarter 2012     61.86       44.52       522,679  
Second quarter 2012     67.48       53.83       749,654  
Third quarter 2012     59.55       53.96       505,225  
Fourth quarter 2012     63.70       56.13       429,951  
First quarter 2013     63.80       53.71       480,344  
                         
                   
Most recent six months                        
                         
October 2012     63.70       58.59       492,495  
November 2012     59.00       56.13       435,198  
December 2012     61.60       57.31       355,954  
January 2013     63.38       59.67       382,999  
February 2013     63.80       57.31       549,337  
March 2013     57.16       53.71       521,254  
April 2013 (through April 26)     54.70       45.97       726,425  

 

 

(1) Each ADS represents the right to receive 20 of our common shares.

 

TRADING ON THE BOLSA DE VALORES DE COLOMBIA

 

The BVC is the largest stock exchange in Colombia for trading securities and derivatives. The BVC is a member of the World Federation of Exchanges and the Federación Iberoamericana de Bolsas .

 

The BVC is the only exchange where our common shares trade in Colombia. The table below sets forth the reported aggregate market capitalization of the BVC, as of December 31, 2012.

 

    Aggregate Market Capitalization of the BVC  
    Market Capitalization     Market Capitalization  
    (Ps$ in billions)    

(US$ in billions) (1)

 
             
December 31, 2012     483,296       273.3  

 

 

(1) Representative Market Exchange Rate at December 31, 2012.

 

116
 

 

Transfer and Registration of Shares

 

Transfer of Shares

 

Under Colombian legislation, if the transfer of shares has a value equivalent or higher than 66,000 Unidades de Valor Real, or UVR, a measurement unit used in the Colombian market calculated daily, and the shares are registered with the BVC, the transfer has to be done through the BVC. Otherwise, shareholders can freely negotiate a transfer of shares.

 

Nevertheless, the following transfers are not required to be executed through the BVC:

 

· transfers between shareholders who are considered to be the same beneficial owner;

 

· transfers of shares owned by financial institutions that are in a liquidation process;

 

· repurchases of shares by the issuer;

 

· transfers of shares made by the Nation or the Financial Institutions Guaranty Fund ( Fondo de Garantias de Instituciones Financieras ) or FOGAFIN;

 

· transfers of shares issued abroad by Colombian companies, provided they take place outside Colombia;

 

· transfers of shares issued by foreign companies, offered through a public offer in Colombia, and that they take place outside Colombia; and

 

· any other transaction specifically authorized by the Superintendency of Finance to take place outside the BVC.

 

With regard to public tender offers, Colombian law requires that all purchases of 25% or more of the outstanding shares with voting rights (including ADSs) of a listed company, or the purchase of 5% or more of the outstanding shares with voting rights (including ADSs) by an existing shareholder or group of shareholders beneficially owning 25% or more of the outstanding capital stock of a listed company, must be made pursuant to a public tender offer.

 

Tender offer rules have certain exemptions:

 

· sales in which 100% of the shareholders authorized the transfer to take place without a tender offer;

 

· transfers made through an auction as a result of privatization procedures;

 

· repurchase of shares by the issuer in open market transactions;

 

· when the company issues shares with voting rights;

 

· when the company capitalizes its debts; and

 

· transfers by virtue of law including donations, liquidation processes and judicial decisions, among others.

 

In any case, the Superintendency of Finance must be notified of any transfer that is deemed to be an “ hecho relevante ” or a material event under Colombian law.

 

Registration of Shares

 

Under Colombian law, transfers of shares must be registered on the issuer’s stock ledger. Only those holders registered on the stock ledger are considered by law as shareholders.

 

However, shares may be traded either in physical or electronic form. Transfers of shares are subject to a process for registration that differs depending on whether the shares are evidenced in physical or electronic form.

 

117
 

 

Transfers of shares evidenced in electronic form must first be registered with the Centralized Security Deposit ( Depósito Centralizado de Valores ) or DECEVAL, through the relevant stockbroker. Once DECEVAL has made the registration in its systems, it notifies the issuer of the transfer of shares in order to make the corresponding registration in the stock ledger.

 

When the stockholder has physical certificates, he is required, either by endorsing the certificates to the buyer or by giving a written instruction to the issuer for it to register the transfer on the stock ledger.

 

Transfers of shares do not require any fees to be paid to the issuer, but they may be subject to certain taxes, stamp duties or other governmental charges which must be paid by the parties.

 

ITEM 10. Additional Information

 

BYLAWS

 

The following is a summary of the material provisions of our bylaws.  The last amendment of our bylaws was approved on March 21, 2013 by the shareholders, which allows the Board of Directors to authorize the issuance and placement of non-convertible bonds as well as other debt securities. The amendment to the bylaws is in the process of being drafted and affirmed by the Notary.

 

This summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified by reference to our bylaws, which are filed as an exhibit to this annual report.  For a description of the provisions of our bylaws relating to our Board of Directors and its committees, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.”

 

Organization and Register

 

Ecopetrol was organized on August 25, 1951, existing under the laws of Colombia.  Since November 13, 2007, Ecopetrol has been a mixed economy company.  We are registered in the Chamber of Commerce of Bogota ( Cámara de Comercio de Bogota ) under registry number 899.999.068-1.

 

Corporate Purpose

 

Pursuant to Article 4 of our bylaws, we may engage in the exploration, production, refining, transportation, storage, distribution and commercialization of crude oil and its by-products in Colombia and abroad, and to support, promote and manage democratization programs and sales of its equity in accordance with applicable rules.  Our bylaws also authorize us to perform activities for the exploration and production of crude oil in areas that prior to January 1, 2004 were operated by us directly or were subject to agreements subscribed by us; to directly or indirectly explore and produce crude oil in areas assigned to us by the ANH; to directly or indirectly explore and produce crude oil in areas assigned to us by a foreign regulatory entity; to buy, sell, import, export, store, blend, or distribute hydrocarbons and its by-products in Colombia or abroad; to undertake research for developing and commercializing alternative energy sources; and in general, to undertake any other activity instrumental or required to develop our corporate purpose.  Our corporate purpose includes administering and managing all properties that were formerly part of the De Mares concession.

 

Additionally, pursuant to Article 5 of our bylaws, we may enter into all acts, contracts and legal business and activities that may be required for us to adequately fulfill our corporate purpose.

 

Preference Rights and Restrictions Attaching to Our Shares

 

We have only one class of stock without special rights or restrictions. Our shareholders do not have any type of preemptive rights.

 

Under Colombian law, our shareholders have the following economic privileges and voting rights:

 

· to participate and vote on the decisions of the general shareholders’ meeting;

 

· to receive dividends based on the financial performance of the Company in proportion to their share ownership;

 

· to transfer and sell shares according to our bylaws and Colombian law;

 

118
 

 

· to inspect corporate books and records 15 business days prior to the ordinary shareholders’ meeting where the year-end financial statements are to be approved;

 

· upon liquidation, to receive a proportional amount of the corporate assets after the payment of external liabilities; and

 

· to sell the shares, known as derecho de retiro , if a corporate restructuring affects the economic or voting rights of the shareholders in the terms and conditions established under Colombian law.

 

Our bylaws and corporate governance code provide additional rights to our minority shareholders. These rights include:

 

· Sale of Assets . For a ten-year period counted from the date of subscription of the declaration of the Nation dated July 26, 2007 or until the Nation loses its status as majority shareholder, the Nation guarantees that any sale of 15% or more of our assets requires the approval of the general shareholders’ meeting and that the Nation would only be allowed to vote its shares in favor of the proposal if 2% or more of our minority shareholders accept the proposal.

 

· Candidate List . Pursuant to our bylaws and Law 1118 of 2006, the Nation will include in its candidate list for election of members of the Board of Directors one member selected by the departments that produce hydrocarbons. In addition, pursuant to the declaration of the Nation dated July 26, 2007, the Nation will include in its candidate list for election of members of the Board of Directors one member selected by the ten largest minority shareholders. The minority shareholders’ right to select a candidate loses its effect when minority shareholders, according to their share participation, name a member to our Board of Directors.

 

· Extraordinary Meetings . Our bylaws and corporate governance code provide that the entity exercising permanent control over Ecopetrol must instruct the Company’s CEO or External Auditor to call an extraordinary meeting of the Company’s shareholders when so requested by a or plurality of shareholders holding at least 5% of the total number of outstanding shares. Such requests shall be made in writing and must clearly indicate the purpose of the meeting.

 

· Office for the Attention of Shareholders . Ecopetrol has an office for the attention of shareholders, our specialized unit responsible for receiving complaints from our shareholders. Pursuant to our bylaws, shareholders holding at least 5% of the total number of shares outstanding may request that the office for the attention of shareholders conduct a special audit of the following documents: the income statement; the proposal for the distribution of profits; the report of the Board of Directors as to the economic and financial status of our Company; the report from our general counsel as to the legal status of our Company; and the report from the independent auditors. Special audits cannot be made of documents that contain scientific, technological or statistical information of our Company, or agreement that gives us competitive and economic advantages over our competitors, or in respect of any document related to intellectual property. Shareholders also have the right to propose good corporate governance recommendations to the office for the protection of investors.

 

· Others .  Pursuant to our bylaws, shareholders holding at least 5% of the total number of shares outstanding may propose recommendations to our Board of Directors pertaining to the management of our Company.  Any shareholder may file a written petition to our Board of Directors to investigate corporate governance violations that the shareholder believes to have been committed.

 

Amendments to Rights and Restrictions to Shares

 

The rights and restrictions given to our shareholders may only be modified through an amendment to our bylaws. The general shareholders’ meeting has full and exclusive authority to modify or amend our bylaws.

 

General Shareholders’ Meeting

 

Shareholders’ meetings may be ordinary or extraordinary.  Ordinary meetings will take place in our legal domicile located in Bogota, Colombia, within the first three months following the end of each fiscal year, on the day and at the time set forth in the notice for the general shareholders’ meeting.  The call for the general shareholders’ meeting may be made electronically or by written communication sent to each shareholder.  In both cases the call must be published in a newspaper of wide circulation 20 business days prior to the date on which the meeting will take place.

 

119
 

 

In the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting, our Board of Directors and the external auditor are appointed and our annual financial statements, profit distribution, audit and management reports and any other matter provided under applicable law or our corporate bylaws are approved.

 

Extraordinary meetings of shareholders may be called by our Board of Directors, by our president or chief executive officer, by our external auditor, or by shareholders holding at least 5% of the shares outstanding.  Calls to extraordinary meetings should be made at least eight days prior to the date of the meeting, and may be made electronically or by written communication to each shareholder or be published in a newspaper of wide circulation.  The meeting notice must specify the agenda for the meeting.

 

The required quorum for both ordinary and extraordinary meetings is 50% plus one share entitled to vote and decisions are approved with a majority of the members present.  This quorum is exempted in the case of “second-call meetings,” which may take place when a meeting fails to obtain the required quorum and is called within a period between 10 business days and 30 business days from the first date, in which case decisions may be adopted by a majority of the shares present regardless of the number represented.

 

Unless Colombian law requires a super majority, decisions made at ordinary and extraordinary shareholders’ meeting must be approved by a majority of the shares present.  Colombian law requires super majorities in the following cases:

 

· the vote of at least 70% of the shares present and entitled to vote at the ordinary shareholders’ meeting is required to approve the issuance of stock not subject to preemptive rights;

 

· the vote of at least 78% of the shares represented entitled to vote is required to approve the distribution of less than 50% of the annual net profits.  If the sum of all legal reserves (statutory, legal and optional) exceeds the amount of the outstanding capital, the Company must distribute at least 70% of the annual net profits;

 

· the vote of at least 80% of the shares represented is required to approve the payment of dividends in shares; and

 

· the vote of 100% of the outstanding and issued shares is required to replace a vacancy on the Board of Directors without applying the electoral quotient system.

 

Shareholders may be represented by proxies provided that the proxy:  (1) is in writing (faxes and electronic documents are valid), (2) specifies the name of the representative, (3) specifies the date or time of the meeting for which the proxy is given and (4) includes other information specified by the applicable law.  Proxies granted abroad do not require legalization or an apostille.

 

During our ordinary annual shareholders’ meeting, our employees and Directors are only allowed to represent their own shares, unless they act as legal representatives.

 

Limitations to the Rights to Hold Securities

 

There are no limitations in our bylaws or Colombian law on the rights of Colombian residents or foreign investors to own the shares of our Company, or on the right to hold or exercise voting rights with respect to those shares, except in cases of legal representation.

 

Restrictions on Change of Control Mergers, Acquisitions or Corporate Restructuring of the Company

 

Under Colombian law and our bylaws, the general shareholders’ meeting has full authority to approve any corporate restructuring including, any mergers, acquisitions or spin-offs.  Corporate restructurings are also subject to the requirement that the Nation must hold a minimum of 80% of our common stock at all times.  While Law 1118 of 2006 is in effect, there cannot be any restructuring that results in a change of control of our Company.

 

Ownership Threshold Requiring Public Disclosure

 

Our corporate governance code provides that we must disclose periodically on our web page, the names of the shareholders of our Company including, at least, the 20 shareholders with the greatest number of shares.  We must also disclose this information to the Superintendency of Finance at the end of each fiscal year.

 

120
 

 

Colombian securities regulations set forth the obligation to disclose any material event or hecho relevante . Any transfer of shares equal or greater than 5% of our capital stock or any person acquiring a percentage of shares that would make him the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our capital stock, is a material event, and therefore, must be disclosed to the Superintendency of Finance.

 

Changes in the Capital of the Company

 

There are no conditions in our bylaws governing changes in our capital stock that are more stringent than those required under Colombian law, with the exception that the Nation must hold a minimum of 80% of our capital stock at all times. Even though the Government noted in previous years its intention to make a proposal to the Colombian Congress that would allow the Nation to hold 70% of the capital stock of the Company, Government officials remarked in early 2013 that no such proposals were intended in 2013. We do not know whether the Government will make such a proposal or if the Colombian Congress will approve any such law.

 

External Auditor

 

Pursuant to our bylaws, our external auditor shall not be appointed for more than five consecutive one-year terms by us. However, an external auditor may be hired again after two terms have passed since the conclusion of its last term of appointment.  At the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting on March 21, 2013, the shareholders appointed Pricewaterhouse Coopers Ltd. as external auditor of Ecopetrol.

 

MATERIAL CONTRACTS

 

Transportation Agreement between Ecopetrol and Empresa Colombiana de Gas ESP/Transportadora de Gas del Interior S.A. ESP

 

On October 6, 2006, we entered into a natural gas transportation agreement with Empresa Colombiana de Gas ESP, or Ecogas, for the transportation of natural gas from the Ballena terminal located in the La Guajira fields to the Barrancabermeja terminal. On February 27, 2007, Ecogas transferred the rights and obligations under this agreement to Transportadora de Gas del Interior S.A. ESP, currently operating as Transportadora de Gas Internacional S.A. ESP, or TGI. This agreement expired on November 30, 2012.

 

On October 1, 2008, Ecopetrol and TGI signed a natural gas transportation agreement for the transportation of 116,500 thousand cfpd from December 1, 2012 to December 31, 2020 of natural gas from the Ballena terminal located in the La Guajira fields to Barrancabermeja. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we pay to TGI a regulated transportation tariff composed of a fixed fee, variable fee depending on transported volumes and an administration, operation and maintenance fee. Payments for transported volume are made in Pesos. During 2012, we paid Ps$49,416 million for the transportation services provided to us by TGI.

 

Transportation Agreement between Ecopetrol and Ocensa

 

On March 31, 1995, we entered into a crude oil transportation agreement with Ocensa. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Agreements—Ocensa.”

 

Reficar

 

On December 30, 2011, we entered into a construction support agreement pursuant to which we agreed to support Reficar’s costs and expenses related to overcost and delays in construction. The project financing contract and the related guarantee are described in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

 

Cenit

 

On April 1, 2013 we entered into two transportation agreements with Cenit, pursuant to which it will provide us with hydrocarbon and refined products transportation and logistics services through the transportation assets transferred to it as an in-kind capitalization. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Agreements—Cenit.”

 

121
 

 

EXCHANGE CONTROLS

 

Payments in foreign currency with respect to certain foreign exchange transactions including international investments between Colombian residents and non-Colombian residents must by law be conducted through the commercial exchange market. Therefore, any foreign currency income or expenses under the ADRs must be channeled through that market. Transactions conducted through the commercial exchange market are made at market rates freely negotiated with authorized intermediaries (banks, financial corporations, administrators and others).

 

Foreign capital investments must be made through authorized foreign exchange investment management companies. Only brokerage firms, trusts and investment management companies, subject to the inspection and supervision of the Superintendency of Finance are allowed to make investments in the local Colombian market on behalf of foreign investors, and, when referring to portfolio investments, such firms, trusts and investment management companies also act as the investors’ local representatives.

 

Colombian law provides that the Colombian Central Bank may intervene in the foreign exchange market at its own discretion at any time. Likewise, from time to time, the Colombian government introduces amendments to the International Investment Statute. The Colombian Central Bank may also limit the remittance of dividends and/or investments of foreign currency received by Colombian residents whenever international reserves fall below an amount equal to three months of imports. We cannot assure you that the Colombian Central Bank will not intervene in the future. However, since the establishment of the current foreign exchange regime in 1991, the Colombian Central Bank has never taken such action. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Colombia’s political and regional environment.”

 

Registration of Foreign Investment Represented in Underlying Shares

 

Colombia’s International Investment Statute, which has been amended from time to time through related decrees and regulations, regulates the manner in which non-Colombian resident entities and individuals can invest in Colombia and participate in the Colombian securities markets. Among other requirements, the statute mandates registration of certain foreign exchange transactions with the Colombian Central Bank and specifies procedures to authorize and administer certain types of foreign investments. Additionally, pertinent information must be updated yearly.

 

Under these foreign investment regulations, the failure of a foreign investor to report or register with the Colombian Central Bank foreign exchange transactions relating to investments in Colombia on a timely basis may prevent the investor from obtaining remittance rights, constitute an exchange control infraction, and result in a fine.

 

Foreign investors who acquire ADRs are not required to register the investment with Colombian authorities. Holders of ADRs will benefit from the registration to be obtained by the custodian for our common shares underlying the ADRs in Colombia, which permits the custodian to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the common shares into foreign currency and remit the proceeds abroad. If investors in ADRs choose to surrender their ADRs and withdraw common shares, they must register their investment in the common shares as a portfolio investment through their local representative. The local representative is the brokerage firm, trust company or investment management company that acts on behalf of the holders for the common shares in Colombia, and the request for registration is made by them through the transmission of consolidated information to the Colombian Central Bank.

 

In obtaining its own foreign investment registration, an investor who surrenders its ADRs and withdraws common shares may incur expenses and/or suffer delays in the application process. Investors would only be allowed to transfer dividends abroad or transfer funds received as distributions relating to our common shares after their foreign investment registration procedure with the Colombian Central Bank has been completed. In addition, the depositary’s foreign investment registration may also be adversely affected by future legislative changes, but its rights to transfer dividends abroad or profits arising from distributions relating to our common shares must be maintained according to Colombian law and foreign investment treaties entered into by Colombia, except when Colombia’s international reserves fall below an amount equivalent to three months’ worth of imports.

 

TAXATION

 

Colombian Tax Considerations

 

The following is a general description of the Colombian tax considerations for investments in common shares in Colombia or for the purchase of ADSs, in a foreign securities market. This description is based on applicable law in effect as of the date of this annual report, which may be subject to change. Please note that changes in tax regulations may apply retroactively, which in turn may affect the validity of the information provided herein.

 

122
 

 

Prospective purchasers of common shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors for a detailed analysis of the tax consequences resulting from the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs.

 

General Rules

 

Entities and individuals who are residents or are domiciled in Colombia or are considered residents in Colombia for tax purposes, are subject to Colombian income tax on their worldwide income. Non-resident entities and non-resident individuals are subject to income tax in Colombia solely on their Colombian-source income which, as a general rule, originates in the sale of assets located in the country at the time of the sale, in the exploitation of tangible and intangible assets in Colombia, and in the rendering of services within the Colombian territory. Double taxation treaties signed by Colombia, if applicable, provide for special rules regarding income tax.

 

For purposes of Colombian taxation, an individual is a resident if he or she meets any of the following criteria:

 

(i) remains in Colombia for more than 183 calendar days within any given 365-consecutive-day term;

 

(ii) is related to the Colombian Government’s foreign service or to individuals who are at the Colombian Government’s foreign service and who, by virtue of the Vienna Conventions on diplomatic and consular relations, is exempt from taxes during the time of service; or

 

(iii) is a Colombian national and:

 

- has a spouse or permanent companion, or dependent children, who are Residents, or

 

- 50% or more of his or her total income is sourced in Colombia, or

 

- 50% or more of his or her assets are managed in Colombia, or

 

- 50% or more of his or her assets are deemed to be located in Colombia, or

 

- has failed to provide proof of residency in another country (different from Colombia) upon previous official request by the Colombian tax office, or

 

- is a resident of a country deemed a tax haven under Colombian law.

 

For purposes of Colombian taxation, an entity is deemed to be a national, and, therefore, is subject to taxation in Colombia as a resident, if it meets any of the following criteria:

 

(i)            it has its place of business or its place of effective management in Colombia during the corresponding year or taxable period;

 

(ii)           it has its main domicile in the Colombian territory; or

 

(iii)          it has been incorporated in Colombia, in accordance with Colombian laws.

 

Pursuant to the Colombian Tax Statute, a foreign company or non-resident individual has a permanent establishment in Colombia when said company or individual performs activities in Colombia through: (i) a fixed place of business (i.e., branches, factories or offices), or (ii) an individual who is not an independent agent empowered to execute agreements on behalf of the foreign company. Permanent establishments are considered Colombian taxpayers in connection with the income and taxable gains attributed to said permanent establishment. A foreign company or entity will not be deemed to have a permanent establishment by the sole fact that it acts through a broker or any other independent agent.

 

123
 

 

Tax Treatment of a Non-Resident of Colombia who Purchases an ADS in a Foreign Securities Market

 

Dividends

 

As a general rule, dividends paid to foreign companies, foreign entities or non-Colombian residents who are investing in Colombian shares directly or through a foreign investment capital fund, or FICF, are treated as Colombian-source income, and thus are subject to Colombian income tax.

 

To avoid double taxation, dividends are not subject to tax at the shareholder level when they are paid out of corporate profits that have been previously taxed at the corporate level. If the accounting or commercial earnings of a Colombian company exceed the tax profits subject to income tax at the corporate level, then the excess distributed as dividends is subject to income tax at the shareholder level. If the shareholder is a non-resident, the applicable tax rate is 33%. Further regulation and decrees are pending to be enacted by the government, as a consequence of the tax reform (Law 1607 of 2012 which entered into force on January 1, 2013).

 

If the shareholder is a non-resident entity or a non-resident individual investing through an FICF on portfolio investments, the applicable withholding tax rate is 25% and it is applied on the basis of the total amounts distributed, assuming that the dividends cannot be attributed to a permanent establishment in Colombia belonging to the shareholder. Foreign shareholders subject to such withholding taxes are not required to file an income tax return in Colombia.

 

Therefore, dividends distributed out of taxed earnings at the corporate level to shareholders who are non-residents will be exempt from income, withholding and remittance taxes. This exception does not apply in the case of distributions paid out of non-taxed earnings at the corporate level, which would be subject to the 33% income tax rate.

 

Taxation of Capital Gains from the sale of ADSs

 

Capital gains obtained from the sale of ADSs by non-resident entities, Colombian individuals who are not residents in Colombia or foreign non-resident individuals, are not subject to income tax in Colombia as such sale does not result in Colombian-source income to the extent that the ADSs are not deemed to be owned in Colombia.

 

If the holder of the ADSs who is a non-resident entity, a Colombian individual who is not a resident in Colombia or a foreign non-resident individual, decides to surrender the ADSs and withdraw the underlying common shares, it is arguable that such transaction does not constitute a capital gain subject to income tax in Colombia. However, different interpretations may be adopted by the Colombian Tax Authorities on this matter.

 

Tax Treatment in Colombia of Non-Resident who Purchases Ecopetrol´s Shares in Colombia’s Securities Market

 

Dividends

 

As a general rule, dividends paid to foreign companies or foreign entities, non-Colombian residents, who are investing in Colombian shares directly or through a FICF are treated as Colombian-source income; thus, they are subject to Colombian income tax.

 

To avoid double taxation, dividends are not subject to tax at the shareholder level when they are paid out of corporate profits that have been previously taxed at the corporate level. If the accounting or commercial earnings of a Colombian company exceed the tax profits subject to income tax at the corporate level, then the excess distributed as dividends is subject to income tax at the shareholder level. If the shareholder is a non-Colombian resident, the applicable tax rate is 33%. Further regulation and decrees are pending to be enacted by the government, as a consequence of the tax reform (Law 1607 of 2012 which entered into force on January 1, 2013).

 

If the shareholder is a non-resident entity or a non-resident individual investing through a FICF on portfolio investments, the applicable withholding tax rate is 25% and it is applied on the basis of the total amounts distributed, assuming that the dividends cannot be attributed to a permanent establishment in Colombia belonging to the shareholder. Foreign shareholders subject to said withholding taxes are not required to file an income tax return in Colombia.

 

124
 

 

Therefore, dividends distributed out of taxed earnings at the corporate level to shareholders who are non-residents, will be exempt from income, withholding and remittance taxes. This exception does not apply in the case of distributions paid out of non-taxed earnings at the corporate level which would be subject to the 33% income tax rate.

 

Taxation of Capital Gains for the Sale of Shares

 

Capital gains obtained in the sale of shares listed on the BVC and owned by the same beneficial owner, are not subject to income tax in Colombia, provided that the shares sold during the taxable year do not represent more than 10% of the outstanding shares of the listed company. Pursuant to Article 18 of Decree 2634 of 2012, sellers of shares are not required to file an income tax return for the transfer of securities that are listed in the National Registry of Securities and Issuers ( Registro Nacional de Valores y Emisores or RNVE ) as long as the foreign investment is treated as a portfolio investment under article 3 of Decree 2080 of 2000.

 

If the abovementioned requirements are not met, the capital gain obtained in the sale of shares is subject to income tax or capital gains tax, under the following rules:

 

· The gain or loss arising therefrom will be equivalent to the difference between the sale price and the tax basis of the shares. As a general rule, the tax basis of shares is equal to the price paid for such shares ( i.e. , cost of acquisition).

 

· The applicable tax rate and the withholding tax rate have to be determined on a case-by-case basis.

 

Tax Treatment by Non-Resident Who Purchase Ecopetrol’s Shares in the BVC Market and Exchange them for ADSs

 

Dividends

 

Payment of dividends made from Colombia to a non-resident are subject to the tax treatment described above. Therefore, payments to holders of ADSs are not subject to income, withholding or remittance taxes. Dividends paid to the Depositary of ADSs arising from Colombian shares are not subject to taxation, unless dividends are paid out of earnings that were not taxed at the corporate level, in which case they will be subject to income tax in Colombia at a 33% rate via withholding tax.

 

Taxation on Capital Gains for the Sale of Shares

 

Assuming that the exchange of securities is treated as a sale of Ecopetrol’s shares, the seller is subject to the tax treatment described above.

 

Therefore, capital gains obtained in the sale of shares listed on the BVC and owned by the same beneficial owner, are not subject to income tax in Colombia, provided that the shares sold during the taxable year do not represent more than 10% of the outstanding shares of the listed company. Pursuant to Article 18 of Decree 2634 of 2012, sellers of shares are not required to file an income tax return for the transfer of securities that are listed in the RNVE as long as the foreign investment is treated as a portfolio investment under article 3 of Decree 2080 of 2000.

 

If the abovementioned requirements are not met, the capital gain obtained in the sale of shares is subject to income tax or capital gains tax, under the following rules:

 

· The gain or loss arising therefrom will be equivalent to the difference between the sale price and the tax basis of the shares. As a general rule, the tax basis of shares is equal to the price paid for such shares ( i.e. , cost of acquisition).

 

· The applicable tax rate and the withholding tax rate has to be determined in a case-by-case basis.

 

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

 

This summary describes the principal U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the U.S. tax consequences that may be relevant to a decision to hold or dispose of common shares or ADSs. This summary applies only to purchasers of common shares or ADSs who will hold the common shares or ADSs as capital assets and does not apply to special classes of holders such as dealers in securities or currencies, holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, holders of ten percent or more of our shares (taking into account shares held directly or through depositary arrangements), tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions, holders liable for the alternative minimum tax, securities traders who elect to account for their investment in common shares or ADSs on a mark-to-market basis, partnerships or other pass-through entities, insurance companies, U.S. expatriates, and persons holding common shares or ADSs in a hedging transaction or as part of a straddle, conversion or other integrated transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The statements regarding U.S. tax law set forth in this summary are based on U.S. law as in force on the date of this annual report, and changes to such law subsequent to the date of this annual report may affect the tax consequences described herein (possibly with retroactive effect). This summary is also based in part on the representations of the Depositary and the assumption that each obligation in the deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms.

 

125
 

 

Each holder is encouraged to consult such holder’s tax advisor concerning the overall tax consequences to it, including the consequences under laws other than U.S. federal income tax laws, of an investment in common shares or ADSs.

 

In this discussion, references to a “U.S. Holder” are to a beneficial holder of a common share or an ADS (1) that is a citizen or resident of the United States of America, (2) that is a corporation, or any other entity taxable as a corporation, organized under the laws of the United States of America, any state thereof or the District of Columbia, or (3) that is otherwise subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net basis with respect to the common shares or ADS.

 

For purposes of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we call the “Code,” holders of ADSs will generally be treated as owners of the common shares represented by such ADSs.

 

This discussion does not address U.S. federal estate and gift tax or the alternative minimum tax consequences of holding common shares or ADSs. In addition, this discussion does not address the state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of holding our common shares or ADSs.

 

Distributions on Common Shares or ADSs

 

A distribution to U.S. Holders made by us of cash or property with respect to common shares or ADSs generally will be treated as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). A U.S. Holder of common shares or ADSs generally will be taxed on such dividend as ordinary income. Distributions in excess of our current or accumulated earnings and profits will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital reducing such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common shares or ADSs. Any distribution in excess of such adjusted tax basis will be treated as capital gain and will be either long-term or short-term capital gain depending upon whether the U.S. Holder held the common shares or ADSs for more than one year. Distributions of additional common shares or ADSs to U.S. Holders that are part of a pro rata distribution to all of our shareholders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. We do not maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles, and, therefore, U.S. Holders should expect that any distributions generally will be reported as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As used below, the term “dividend” means a distribution that constitutes a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 

The amount of any distribution will include the amount of any Colombian tax withheld on the amount distributed, and the amount of a distribution paid in Pesos will be measured by reference to the exchange rate for converting Pesos into U.S. dollars in effect on the date the distribution is received by the Depositary (or by a U.S. Holder in the case of a holder of common shares). If the Depositary (or U.S. Holder in the case of a holder of common shares) does not convert such Pesos into U.S. dollars on the date it receives them, it is possible that the U.S. Holder will recognize foreign currency loss or gain, which would be ordinary loss or gain, when the Pesos are converted into U.S. dollars. Dividends paid by us will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations under the Code.

 

Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, the dividends received by an individual with respect to the ADSs will be subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 20.0% if the dividends are “qualified dividends.” Dividends paid on the ADSs will be treated as qualified dividends if (1) the ADSs are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States and (2) we were not, in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and are not, in the year in which the dividend is paid, a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”). The ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and will qualify as readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States so long as they are so listed. Based on our audited financial statements and relevant market and shareholder data, we believe that we were not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to our 2012 taxable year. In addition, based on our audited financial statements and our current expectations regarding the value and nature of our assets, the sources and nature of our income, and relevant market and shareholder data, we do not anticipate becoming a PFIC for the 2013 taxable year. Based on existing guidance, it is not clear whether dividends received with respect to the common shares will be treated as qualified dividends. In addition, the U.S. Treasury has announced its intention to promulgate rules pursuant to which holders of ADSs or common shares and intermediaries through whom such securities are held will be permitted to rely on certifications from issuers to treat dividends as qualified for tax reporting purposes. Because such procedures have not yet been issued, it is not clear whether we will be able to comply with them. Holders of ADSs and common shares should consult their own tax advisers regarding the availability of the reduced dividend tax rate in the light of the considerations discussed above and their own particular circumstances.

 

126
 

 

A U.S. Holder will be entitled, subject to a number of complex limitations and conditions, to claim a U.S. foreign tax credit in respect of any Colombian income taxes withheld on dividends received on common shares or ADSs. U.S. Holders who do not elect to claim a credit for any foreign income taxes paid during the taxable year may instead claim a deduction in respect of such Colombian income taxes provided the U.S. Holder elects to deduct (rather than credit) all foreign income taxes for that year. Dividends received with respect to the common shares or ADSs will be treated as foreign source income, subject to various classifications and other limitations. For the purposes of the U.S. foreign tax credit limitations, the dividends paid with respect our common shares or ADSs should generally constitute “passive category income.” The rules relating to computing foreign tax credits or deducting foreign income taxes are extremely complex, and U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own independent tax advisors regarding the availability of foreign tax credits with respect to any Colombian income taxes withheld.

 

Sale, Exchange or Other Taxable Dispositions of Common Shares or ADSs

 

A U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss upon the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares or ADSs in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of the common shares or ADSs and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common shares or ADSs. Any gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the common shares or ADSs have been held for more than one year. Certain non-corporate U.S. Holders (including individuals) may be eligible for preferential rates of U.S. federal income tax in respect of long-term capital gains. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations under the Code.

 

If you are a U.S. Holder of common shares or ADSs, the initial tax basis of your common shares or ADSs will be the U.S. dollar value of the Peso-denominated purchase price determined on the date of purchase. If the common shares or ADSs are treated as traded on an “established securities market,” a cash basis U.S. Holder, or, if it elects, an accrual basis U.S. Holder, will determine the dollar value of the cost of such common shares or ADSs by translating the amount paid at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the purchase. If you convert U.S. dollars to Pesos and immediately use that currency to purchase common shares or ADSs, such conversion generally will not result in taxable gain or loss to you.

 

With respect to the sale or exchange of common shares or ADSs, the amount realized generally will be the U.S. dollar value of the payment received determined on (1) the date of receipt of payment in the case of a cash basis U.S. Holder and (2) the date of disposition in the case of an accrual basis U.S. Holder. If the common shares or ADSs are treated as traded on an “established securities market,” a cash basis taxpayer, or, if it elects, an accrual basis taxpayer, will determine the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized by translating the amount received at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the sale.

 

If a Colombian income tax is withheld or otherwise imposed on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares or ADSs, the amount realized by a U.S. Holder will include the gross amount of the proceeds of that sale or other disposition before deduction of the Colombian income tax. Capital gain or loss, if any, realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares or ADSs generally will be treated as U.S. source income or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, in the case of a disposition of a common share or ADS that is subject to Colombian income tax imposed on the gain, the U.S. Holder may not be able to benefit from the foreign tax credit for the Colombian income tax (because the income or loss on the disposition would be U.S. sourced), unless the U.S. Holder can apply the credit against U.S. federal income tax payable on other income from foreign sources. Alternatively, the U.S. Holder may take a deduction for the Colombian income tax if it does not elect to claim a foreign tax credit for any foreign income taxes paid or accrued during the taxable year.

 

Deposits and withdrawals of common shares in exchange for ADSs will not result in the realization of gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

 

In general, dividends on common shares or ADSs, and payments of the proceeds of a sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares or ADSs, paid within the United States, by a U.S. payor through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries to a U.S. Holder are subject to information reporting and may be subject to backup withholding at a current rate of 28% unless the holder (1) establishes that it is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (2) with respect to backup withholding, provides an accurate taxpayer identification number and certifies that it is a U.S. person and that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has occurred.

 

127
 

 

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. The amount of any backup withholding tax from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS. A U.S. Holder generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules that exceed its U.S. federal income tax liability by timely filing a refund claim with the IRS.

 

U.S. Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. Holders

 

A holder or beneficial owner of common shares or ADSs that is not a U.S. Holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes (a “non-U.S. Holder”) generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on dividends received on common shares or ADSs.

 

A non-U.S. Holder of common shares or ADSs will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on gain realized on the sale of common shares or ADSs, unless, in the case of gain realized by an individual non-U.S. Holder, the non-U.S. Holder is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions are met.

 

Although non-U.S. Holders generally are exempt from backup withholding, a non-U.S. Holder may be required to comply with certification and identification procedures in order to establish its exemption from information reporting and backup withholding.

 

DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

 

We file reports, including annual reports on Form 20-F, and other information with the SEC pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC that apply to foreign private issuers. You may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC in the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F. Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference room. Any filings we make are also available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and at our website at www.ecopetrol.com.co. (This URL is intended to be an inactive textual reference only. It is not intended to be an active hyperlink to our website. The information on our website, which might be accessible through a hyperlink resulting from this URL, is not and shall not be deemed to be incorporated into this annual report.)

 

ITEM 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Risk Management and Financial Instruments

 

We are exposed to certain risks associated with the nature of our operations and the financial instruments we use. Among those risks affecting our financial assets, liabilities and expected future cash flows are the changes in commodity prices, currency exchange rates and interest rates.

 

Commodity price risk is associated with our day-to-day operations as we export and import crude oil, natural gas, and refined products. We control our exposure to commodity price volatility using the “cash flow at risk” methodology, which provides an estimation of the impact that price fluctuations have over the liquidity of the company. When necessary, we use derivative financial instruments such as options and swaps to hedge our exposure to volatility in commodity prices. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or profit-generating purposes.

 

Currency risk is associated with the fact that approximately 65% of our income is denominated in U.S. dollars and only 35% of our expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars, whereas our income and expenses denominated in Colombian pesos are 35% and 65%, respectively. We control our currency risk using natural hedging when possible, by maintaining funds in U.S. dollars and Pesos to meet our expenses in its respective currency. However, we have to sell U.S. dollars regularly in order to cover the currency mismatches that may arise. Derivative financial instruments such as forwards, futures and swaps are usually used when weaker or stronger Peso/U.S. dollar-denominated obligations may affect the cash flow of the Company. In addition, the obligations derived from our U.S. dollar-denominated debt are naturally hedged by our funds in the same currency. This situation partially mitigates any adverse effect that currency risk may have over the financial statements of the Company.

 

128
 

 

Interest rate risk arises from our exposure to changes in interest rates, as we have floating-rate instruments in our investment portfolio and issuances of floating rate debt linked to DTF and IPC rates.  Thus, volatility in interest rates may affect the fair value and cash flows related to our investments and floating rate debt. In 2011, credit risk events emerged constantly, with financial entities being downgraded or declaring restricted default. As a result, our analysis of the situation in the global financial markets resulted in the decision not to hedge the interest rate risk. Nevertheless, our treasury office continuously monitors the performance of interest rates and its impact on the financial statements of the Company. On the other hand, the exposure to interest rate risk of our fixed income portfolio is controlled through its effective duration. The limits allowed for the effective duration are between +/- 25% of the portfolio’s benchmark duration.

 

Investment Guidelines

 

Following Decree 1525 of 2008, our management established guidelines for our investment portfolios. In general terms, our guidelines determine that we must invest our excess cash in fixed-income securities issued by entities rated A or higher in the long term and A1/P1/F1 or higher in the short term (international scale) by a recognized rating agency.  We have no limitation to invest in securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or the Colombian government. In our Peso-portfolio, we must invest in fixed-income securities of issuers rated AAA in the long term and F1+/BRC1+ in the short term (local scale) by a recognized rating agency, except securities issued or guaranteed by the Colombian government.

 

Our investment portfolio in U.S. dollars is segmented in four tranches, each one matching our liquidity needs.  The working capital tranche is calculated taking into account our cash flow needs for the next 60 days.  The liquidity tranche is calculated as the contingent cash flow needs over the working capital, taking into account the development of capital expenditures related to projects.  The asset liability tranche is built to match our off-balance sheet debt.  The investment tranche includes the remaining amount of the total portfolio after deducting the amounts pertaining to the above mentioned tranches.

 

Our investment portfolio in Pesos is segmented in two tranches, each one matching our liquidity needs.  The first tranche is calculated taking into account our cash flow needs for the next 30 days, and the second tranche is built for investment purposes.

 

129
 

 

Sensitivity Analysis

 

The following table provides information about our financial statements as of December 31, 2012 that may be sensitive to changes in West Texas Intermediate, or WTI, prices and exchange rates:

 

    Income
Statement 2012
   

Income
Statement Case
WTI (1)  + US$1

    Difference
Between Real
2012 and Case
WTI
   

Income
Statement Case
TRM (2)  - 1%

    Difference
Between Real
2012 and Case
TRM
 
    (Pesos in Billons)  
                               
Local Revenue     24,361.91       24,596.14       234.23       24,181.03       (180.88 )
Export Revenue     44,490.09       44,886.71       396.63       44,094.58       (395.50 )
Total Revenue     68,852.00       69,482.85       630.85       68,275.61       (576.39 )
Cost of Sales     40,535.51       40,795.77       260.26       40,333.17       (202.34 )
Selling Operating Expenses     3,235.22       3,235.22       0.00       3,235.22       0.00  
Administrative Operating Expenses     874.98       874.98       0.00       874.98       0.00  
Operating Profit     24,206.29       24,576.88       370.59       23,832.24       (374.05 )
Non-Operating Income (Expenses)     (1,999.87 )     (1,999.87 )     0.00       (1,999.87 )     0.00  
Profit before Income Tax     22,206.42       22,577.01       370.59       21,832.37       (374.05 )
Income Tax     (7,133.39 )     (7,255.67 )     (122.27 )     (7,016.95 )     (116.45 )
Minority Interest     (419.36 )     (419.36 )     0.00       (419.36 )     0.00  
Net Income     14,653.67       14,901.99       248.32       14,396.07       (257.60 )

 

 

WTI= West Texas Intermediate.

(1) Average WTI for 2012 was US$94.20 per barrel.
(2) Average Market Representative Rate for 2012 was Ps$1,798 per US$1.00 on a calendar day basis.

 

Assumptions for the Sensitivity Analysis of Financial Statements

 

· The base scenario on which our sensitivity analysis is made corresponds to the Consolidated Statements of Financial, Economic, Social and Environmental Activity or Income Statement, for 2012 as presented elsewhere in this annual report.

 

· The sensitivity of the WTI price index is the increase of one U.S. dollar per barrel of crude oil in the average WTI reference price based on a 365-day year for 2012. Prices assumed correspond to real prices for crude oil, natural gas and refined products for 2012, adjusted to account for the differences between such real prices and the WTI reference price.

 

· The sensitivity of our results to changes in the exchange rates is the 2.67% average appreciation of the Peso against the U.S. dollar during 2012. Prices assumed correspond to real prices of crude oil, natural gas and refined products in 2012, proportionally adjusted to account for differences between actual and the monthly average exchange rate.

 

130
 

 

The table below sets forth the line items that are being affected by the variation on the reference prices or the average exchange rate.

 

VARIATION ON WTI REFERENCE PRICE VARIATION ON AVERAGE EXCHANGE RATE
OPERATING INCOME
Local Sales Local Sales
Crude Oil Crude Oil
Refined products Refined products
Natural gas Natural gas
   
Exports Exports
Crude Oil Crude Oil
Refined products Refined products
Natural gas Natural gas
COST OF SALES
Local purchases Local purchases
Purchases from business partners Purchases from business partners
Purchases of hydrocarbons from the ANH Purchases of hydrocarbons from the ANH
Purchases of Natural gas Purchases of Natural gas
Imports Imports
Crude Oil Crude Oil
Products Products
NON-OPERATING INCOME
  Exchange income
  Exchange loss

 

ITEM 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

 

ITEM 12A. Debt Securities

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 12B. Warrants and Rights

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 12C. Other Securities

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 12D. American Depositary Shares

 

Fees and Charges That a Holder of our ADSs May Have to Pay, Either Directly or Indirectly

 

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., our Depositary, may charge each person to whom ADSs are issued, including, without limitation, issuances against deposits of shares, issuances in respect of share distributions, rights and other distributions, issuances pursuant to a stock dividend or stock split declared by us or issuances pursuant to a merger, exchange of securities or any other transaction or event affecting the ADSs or deposited securities, and each person surrendering ADSs for withdrawal of deposited securities in any manner permitted by the deposit agreement or whose ADRs are cancelled or reduced for any other reason, US$5.00 for each 100 ADS (or any portion thereof) issued, delivered, reduced, cancelled or surrendered, as the case may be. The Depositary may sell (by public or private sale) sufficient securities and property received in respect of a share distribution, rights and/or other distribution prior to such deposit to pay such charge.

 

131
 

 

The Depositary collects its fees for issuance and cancellation of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The Depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The Depositary may collect its annual fee for Depositary services by deduction from cash distributions, or by directly billing investors, or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The Depositary may generally refuse to provide services to any holder until the fees and expenses owing by such holder for those services or otherwise are paid.

 

The following additional charges may be incurred by ADS holders, by any party depositing or withdrawing shares or by any party surrendering ADSs or to whom ADSs are issued (including, without limitation, issuance pursuant to a stock dividend or stock split declared by us or an exchange of stock regarding the ADRs or the deposited securities or a distribution of ADSs), whichever is applicable:

 

· a fee of US$1.50 per ADR or ADRs for transfers of certificated or direct registration ADRs;

 

· a fee of up to US$0.02 per ADS for any cash distribution made pursuant to the deposit agreement;

 

· a fee of US$0.05 per ADS per calendar year (or portion thereof) for services performed by the Depositary in administering our ADR program (which fee may be charged on a periodic basis during each calendar year and shall be assessed against holders of ADRs as of the record date or record dates set by the Depositary during each calendar year and shall be payable in the manner described in the next succeeding provision);

 

· any other charge payable by any of the Depositary, any of the Depositary’s agents, including, without limitation, the custodian, or the agents of the Depositary’s agents in connection with the servicing of our shares or other deposited securities (which charge shall be assessed against registered holders of our ADRs as of the record date or dates set by the Depositary and shall be payable at the sole discretion of the Depositary by billing such registered holders or by deducting such charge from one or more cash dividends or other cash distributions);

 

· a fee for the distribution of securities (or the sale of securities in connection with a distribution), such fee being in an amount equal to the fee for the execution and delivery of ADSs which would have been charged as a result of the deposit of such securities (treating all such securities as if they were shares) but which securities or the net cash proceeds from the sale thereof are instead distributed by the Depositary to those holders entitled thereto;

 

· stock transfer or other taxes and other governmental charges;

 

· cable, telex and facsimile transmission and delivery charges incurred at the ADS holder’s request;

 

· transfer or registration fees for the registration of transfer of deposited securities on any applicable register in connection with the deposit or withdrawal of deposited securities;

 

· expenses of the Depositary in connection with the conversion of foreign currency into U.S. dollars; and

 

· such fees and expenses as are incurred by the Depositary (including, without limitation, expenses incurred in connection with compliance with foreign exchange control regulations or any law or regulation relating to foreign investment) in delivery of deposited securities or otherwise in connection with the Depositary’s or its custodian’s compliance with applicable laws, rules or regulations.

 

We will pay all other charges and expenses of the Depositary and any agent of the Depositary (except the custodian) pursuant to agreements from time to time between us and the Depositary. The fees described above may be amended from time to time.

 

Fees and Other Direct and Indirect Payments Made by the Depositary to Us

 

Our Depositary has agreed to reimburse us for certain expenses we incur that are related to establishment and maintenance of the ADR program, including investor relations expenses and exchange application and listing fees.  In 2012, the Depositary made direct payments and reimbursements to us in the amount of approximately US$446,149.84 for expenses related to investor relations expenses.

 

ITEM 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

 

None.

 

132
 

 

ITEM 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

 

None.

 

ITEM 15. Controls and Procedures

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

As required by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of December 31, 2012, we evaluated the design and effectiveness of our financial disclosure controls and procedures under the supervision and participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even if effective, disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

 

Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file and submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, summarized and reported as and when required and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and affected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and it includes those policies and procedures that:

 

· pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of our assets;

 

· provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of our management and directors; and

 

· provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, effective control over financial reporting cannot, and does not, provide absolute assurance of achieving our control objectives. Also, projection of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal controls to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

As of the year ended December 31, 2012, our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the criteria established in the publication “Internal Control – Integrated Framework”, issued by the Treadway Commission’s Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO), as well as the rules prescribed by the SEC in its Final Rule “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports.”

 

Based on the assessment performed, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

 

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting has been audited by KPMG Ltda., an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their audit report accompanying our consolidated financial statements.

 

133
 

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes made in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2012 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

KPMG Ltda.’s attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting is included in their audit report accompanying our consolidated financial statements. See our consolidated financial statements.

 

ITEM 16. [Reserved]

 

ITEM 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert

 

Our Board of Directors has determined that Roberto Steiner Sampedro qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” and he is independent under the definition of “independent” applicable to us under the rules of the NYSE (17 CFR 240.10A-3). See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Audit Committee.”

 

ITEM 16B. Code of Ethics

 

We have adopted a code of ethics within the meaning of this Item 16B of Form 20-F, which complies with applicable U.S. and Colombian law.  Our code of ethics applies to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, principal accounting officer, persons performing similar functions and other personnel.  Our code of ethics is available on our website at http://www.ecopetrol.com.co/english/especiales/Ethics_Code2010_English/index_eng.html.  If we amend the provisions of our code of ethics that apply to our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer, our principal accounting officer and persons performing similar functions, or if we grant any waiver of such provisions, we will disclose such amendment or waiver on our website at the same address.

 

ITEM 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

 

The following table sets forth the fees billed to us by KPMG during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

 

    At December 31,  
    2012     2011  
    (in millions of pesos, excluding 16% value added tax)  
       
Audit fees     6,548       5,411  
Audit-related fees     225       1,013  
Tax fees     295       287  
All Other fees (1)     3,384       1,553  
                 
Total     10,452       8,264  

 

 

(1) Provision of advice that helps Ecopetrol develop its documents, procedures and policies related to Business Continuity Planning in certain areas of the organization.

 

Audit Fees. The audit fees listed in the table above are the aggregated fees billed by KPMG in connection with its audits of our annual consolidated financial statements (under Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP), interim consolidated financial statements (under Colombian Government Entity GAAP), subsidiary audits (under local GAAP) and review of periodic documents filed with the SEC. In addition, these audit fees include fees related to our independent auditors’ audits of our internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Audit-related Fees. The audit-related fees listed in the table above are the fees billed by KPMG in connection with their agreed-upon procedures of our variable compensation bonus system.

 

Tax Fee. The tax fees listed in the table above correspond to (1) assisting some subsidiaries in the preparation and filing of appropriate tax returns with the tax authorities (including electronic filings), (2) advising some subsidiaries about the tax consequences associated with new or proposed legislation and (3) rendering advice to some subsidiaries on the likely tax consequences of proposed transactions and the appropriate methods of structuring and reporting.

 

134
 

 

Audit Committee Approval Policies and Procedures

 

Our audit committee has not established pre-approval policies and procedures for the engagement of our independent auditors for services. Our audit committee expressly approves on a case-by-case basis any engagement of our independent auditors for audit and non-audit services provided to us.

 

ITEM 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

 

None.

 

ITEM 16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

 

At the general ordinary shareholders meeting held on March 21, 2013, the Company´s shareholders approved the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers Ltda. as recommended by the Company’s Audit Committee, as the new independent registered public accounting firm to replace KPMG Ltda., which was appointed as described above.

 

During the Company’s two fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and subsequent interim periods through the date of its report, there were no disagreements with KPMG Ltda. on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of KPMG Ltda. would have caused them to make reference thereto in their reports on the consolidated financial statements for such periods.

 

During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the subsequent periods through the date of its report, there have been no reportable events (as defined in Item 16F(a)(1)(v)) of Form 20-F).

 

We have not previously consulted with PricewaterhouseCoopers Ltda. regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific completed or contemplated transaction; (ii) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements; or (iii) a reportable event (as provided in 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F) during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, or any later interim period, including the interim period up to and including the date of its report.

 

We have provided KPMG Ltda. with a copy of the foregoing disclosure, and have requested that KPMG Ltda. furnish us with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not KPMG Ltda. agrees with such disclosure, which we attach to this report as Exhibit 16.1 as required by Item 16F(a)(3) of Form 20-F.

 

At the general ordinary shareholders meeting held on March 24, 2011, the Company´s shareholders approved the appointment of KPMG Ltda., as recommended by the Company’s Audit Committee, as the new independent registered public accounting firm to replace PricewaterhouseCoopers Ltda., as previously reported in the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as amended.

 

During the Company’s two fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and subsequent interim periods through July 15, 2011, there were no disagreements with PricewaterhouseCoopers Ltda. on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure , or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of PricewaterhouseCoopers Ltda., would have caused them to make reference to such disagreement in their reports on the consolidated financial statements for such periods.

 

During the Company’s two fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the subsequent periods through July 15, 2011, there have been no reportable events (as defined in Item 16F(a)(1)(v)) of Form 20-F).

 

135
 

 

We did not previously consult with KPMG Ltda. regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific completed or contemplated transaction; (ii) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements; or (iii) a reportable event (as provided in Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F) during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, or any later interim period, including the interim period up to and including the date the relationship with Pricewaterhouse Coopers Ltda.. KPMG Ltda. reviewed the foregoing disclosure required by Item 16F of Form 20-F before it was filed with the SEC and was provided an opportunity to furnish the SEC with a letter addressed to the SEC containing any new information, clarification of the expression of our views, or the respects in which it does not agree with the statements made by us in response to Item 16F of Form 20-F.

 

ITEM 16G. Corporate Governance

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 303A.11 of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual, the following is a summary of the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and those required for U.S. companies under the NYSE listing standards.

 

The following discloses the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the NYSE standards.

 

NYSE Standards   Our Corporate Governance Practices
Director Independence
 
The majority of the board of directors must be independent.  §303A.01.  “Controlled companies,” which would include Ecopetrol if we were a U.S. issuer, are exempt from this requirement.  A controlled company is one in which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company, rather than the public.  §303A.00.   Law No. 964/2005 establishes that (1) the board of directors of listed companies must be comprised of a minimum of five directors and a maximum of ten directors and (2) at least 25% of board members must be independent.  Under our corporate governance guidelines, our board of directors must be comprised of nine directors, of which at least three must be independent.  As of the date of this annual report, we have six (6) independent directors.
     
Executive Sessions
 
The non-management directors of each listed company must meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management.  §303A.03.   A comparable rule does not exist under Colombian law.  Except for our Audit Committee, our Board of Directors does not meet without management.
     
Nominating/Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee
 
A nominating/corporate governance and sustainability committee composed entirely of independent directors is required.  The committee must have a charter specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures of the committee.  §303A.04.  “Controlled companies” are exempt from these requirements.  §303A.00.   Colombian law does not require the establishment of a nominating and corporate governance and sustainability committee composed entirely of independent directors.  Pursuant to our bylaws, both our corporate governance and sustainability committee, and our nomination and compensation committee shall be composed of at least one independent director which acts pursuant to a written charter.
     
Compensation Committee
 
A compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors is required, which must evaluate and approve executive officer compensation.  The committee must have a charter specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures of the committee.  §303A.05.  “Controlled companies” are exempt from this requirement.  §303A.00.   Colombian law does not require the establishment of a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors.  Pursuant to our bylaws, our nomination and compensation committee shall be composed of at least one independent director which acts pursuant to a written charter.
     
Audit Committee
 
An audit committee with a minimum of three independent directors satisfying the independence and other requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and the more stringent requirements under the NYSE standards is required.  §303A.06, §303A.07.   According to Law No. 964/2005, Colombian companies that are authorized to issue securities by the Superintendency of Finance must have an audit committee that satisfies the requirements of Law No. 964/2005, including its minimum number of members, independence criteria and audit related duties.  Our audit committee is composed of Joaquín Moreno Uribe, Amilcar Acosta Medina, Roberto Steiner Sampedro, Luis Carlos Villegas Echeverri and Jorge Pinzón Sánchez, all of whom are independent directors, and the committee meets the requirements of Law No. 964/2005 and Rule 10A 3 under the Exchange Act.

 

136
 

 

Equity Compensation Plans
 
Equity compensation plans and all material revisions thereto require shareholder approval, subject to limited exemptions.  §§303A.08 and 312.03.   Under Colombian law, no similar right to vote on equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto is given to shareholders.  We do not give our shareholders the right to vote on equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto.
     
 Corporate Governance Guidelines
     
Listed companies must adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines.  §303A.09.   The Superintendency of Finance does recommend the adoption of corporate governance guidelines.  However, according to Superintendency of Finance Circular No. 007/2011, the adoption of corporate governance guidelines is voluntary.  Listed companies must annually publish a corporate governance survey comparing their corporate governance standards with those recommended by the Superintendency of Finance.  Our corporate governance guidelines (Code of Good Corporate Governance) are listed on our website at http://www.ecopetrol.com.co.
     
Code of Ethics for Directors, Officers and Employees
 
Corporate governance guidelines and a code of business conduct and ethics is required, with disclosure of any waiver for directors or executive officers.  The code must contain compliance standards and procedures that will facilitate the effective operation of the code.  §303A.10.   We have adopted a code of ethics which complies with applicable U.S. and Colombian law.  Our code of ethics applies to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, principal accounting officer, persons performing similar functions and generally to all the employees, members of the board of directors, suppliers, and contractors of Ecopetrol S.A. and its corporate group.  Our code of ethics is available on our website at http://www.ecopetrol.com.co.

 

ITEM 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 17. Financial Statements

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 18. Financial Statements

 

See our audited consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1, incorporated herein by reference.

 

137
 

 

ITEM 19. Exhibits

 

Exhibit No.   Description
1.1   Bylaws of Ecopetrol S.A., dated November 6, 2007, as recorded under Public Deed No. 5314 of November 14, 2007 (English Translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 on Form 20-F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 2008 (File No. 001-34175)).
     
1.2   Amended and Restated Bylaws of Ecopetrol S.A., dated March 24, 2011, as recorded under Public Deed No. 560 of May 23, 2011 (English Translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 on Form 20-F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2011 (File No. 001-34175)).
     
4.1   Transportation Agreement between Ecopetrol S.A. and Oleoducto Central S.A., dated March 31, 1995 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 on Form 20-F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 2008 (File No. 001-34175)) (English Translation).
     
4.2   Supplementary Agreement to Transportation Agreement between Ecopetrol S.A. and Oleoducto Central S.A., dated January 13, 2013 (English Translation).
     
4.3   Natural Gas Transportation Agreement between Ecopetrol S.A. and Transportadora de Gas del Interior S.A. ESP, dated October 1, 2008 (English Translation).
     
4.4   Supplementary Agreement No. 1, dated December 5, 2008, to the Natural Gas Transportation Agreement between Ecopetrol S.A. and Transportadora de Gas del Interior S.A. ESP, dated October 1, 2008 (English Translation).
     
4.5   Supplementary Agreement No. 2, dated April 11, 2012, to the Natural Gas Transportation Agreement between Ecopetrol S.A. and Transportadora de Gas del Interior S.A. ESP, dated October 1, 2008 (English Translation).
     
4.6   Crude Oil Transportation Services Agreement between Ecopetrol S.A. and Cenit Transporte y Logística de Hidrocarburos S.A.S., dated April 1, 2013 (English Translation).
     
4.7   Refined Products Transportation Services Agreement between Ecopetrol S.A. and Cenit Transporte y Logística de Hidrocarburos S.A.S., dated April 1, 2013 (English Translation).
     
4.8   Indenture, dated as of July 23, 2009, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form F-4 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on July 31, 2009 (File No. 333-160965)).
     
8.1   List of subsidiaries of Ecopetrol S.A.
     
12.1   Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.
     
12.2   Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.
     
13.1   Section 906 Officer Certification.
     
16.1   Letter dated April 29, 2013 of KPMG Ltda. as required by Item 16F of Form 20-F.
     
99.1   Third Party Reserve Report of Ryder Scott.
     
99.2   Third Party Reserve Report of Gaffney, Cline & Associates.
     
99.3   Third Party Reserve Report of DeGolyer and MacNaughton.

 

The amount of long-term debt securities of Ecopetrol authorized under any given instrument does not exceed 10% of its total assets on a consolidated basis. Ecopetrol hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon its request, a copy of any instrument defining the rights of holders of its long-term debt or of its subsidiaries for which consolidated or unconsolidated financial statements are required to be filed.

 

138
 

 

ANNEX I 

DESCRIPTION OF “CONVENIOS” WITH THE ANH

 

Convenio
Name
Type of
Agreement
Purpose Owner Partners Ownership
Percentage
Partnership
Percentage
Term of 
Convenio
Right of
Reversion 
upon

Termination
Royalty
Tibú Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20% and variable (8% to 25%)
Chimichagua Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Río Meta Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Nancy Burdine Maxine Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%
Rancho Hermoso Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Camoa Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Cicuco - Momposina Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Playón Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%
Cicuco - Boquete Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Quebradaroja Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Ayombe Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%

 

139
 

 

El Díficil Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%
Toca Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%
Barranca Lebrija Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%
Pavas Cáchira Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%
Río de Oro Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%
Chenche Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Valdivia - Almagro Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%
La Rompida Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
La Cira Infantas Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Cubarral Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Apiay Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Lisama Nutria Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Provincia P-Norte Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Provincia P-Sur Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Sogamoso Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Palagua Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20% and variable (8% to 25%)

 

140
 

 

Pijao Potrerillo Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 32% and variable (8% to 25%)
Caimito Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable  (8% to 25%)
Ortega/Pacande Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20% and variable (8% to 25%)
Toy Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%
Quimbaya Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%
Toldado Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%
Santa Clara Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 32% and variable (8% to 25%)
Área Occidental Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20% and variable (8% to 25%)
Área Sur Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%
 Orito Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20% and variable (8% to 25%)
Tisquirama Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 8% to 25%
Nororiente Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%
Suroriente Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20% and variable (8% to 25%)
Río Zulia Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 32%
Arauca Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 32%
Entrerríos Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)

 

141
 

 

Hato Nuevo Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 32% and variable (8% - 25%)
La Punta Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Tello La Jagua Contrato Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 50% 50% Field’s economic limit Yes 26.5% and variable (8% to 25%)
Huila Convenio Exploration and Production Ecopetrol Ecopetrol - ANH 100% 0% Field’s economic limit Yes 20%

 

142
 

 

ANNEX II

DESCRIPTION OF EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION CONTRACTS

 

Region Contract
Name
Type of
Agreement
Purpose Operator Partners Ownership
Percentage
Partnership Percentage Term of
Contract
Expiration
Date
Right of Reversion
upon Termination
Royalty
Southern Abanico Joint Venture E&P Pacific Stratus Energy Pacific Stratus Energy 50% Pacific Stratus Energy 50% 28 years October 10, 2024 Yes variable (5% to 25%)
Minor Fields Alcaravan Joint Venture - Sole Risk E&P Colombia Energy Development Co. (antes Harken) Colombia Energy Development Co. (antes Harken) 0% Colombia Energy Development Co. 100% 28 years February 13, 2021 Yes variable (20% and  5% to 25%).
Alcaravan Joint Venture 50% Colombia Energy Development Co. 50% variable (8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Arjona Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Vetra- Suroco Consortium Vetra- Suroco Consortium 40% Volumen A (Escalonada) Consorcio Vetra - Suroco 60% Volumen A (Escalonada) 10 years February 14, 2021 (Amendment 3) Yes variable(8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Ambrosía Joint Venture E&P Interoil Interoil 30% Interoil Colombia E&P 70% 25 years December 27, 2027 Yes variable(8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Barranca Lebrija Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Union Temporal Mocam SAS Union Temporal Mocam SAS (ASER INGENIERIA ING S.A., CONEQUIPOS ING LTDA. MOVE S.A. Y MONTECZ S.A.) 19% Unión Temporal Mocam S.A.S. 81% 10 years December 29, 2013 Yes 20%
Minor Fields Bocachico Joint Venture - Sole Risk E&P Colombia Energy Development Co. (antes Harken) Colombia Energy Development Co. (antes Harken) 0% Colombia Energy Development Co. 100% 28 years March 7, 2022 Yes 20%
Minor Fields Bolivar Joint Venture - Sole Risk E&P Colombia Energy Development Co. (antes Harken) Colombia Energy Development Co. (antes Harken) 0% Colombia Energy Development Co. 100% 28 years June 12, 2024 Yes 20%
Minor Fields Camoa Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Drilling and Workover Services Ltda. Drilling and Workover Services Ltda. 20% Drilling and Workover Services Ltda. 80% 10 years December 31, 2012 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Carbonera la Silla Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Mompos Oil Company Inc. Mompos Oil Company Inc. 6% Mompos Oil Company Inc. 94% 10 years October 25, 2014 Yes 20%
Southern Boquerón Joint Venture E&P Petrobras Petrobras/Nexen 75% (R Factor applied ) Petrobras Colombia Ltd. 15% Nexen Petroleum Colombia Ltd. 10 % 28 years September 30, 2023 Yes variable ( 5% to 25%)
Minor Fields Cerrito Joint Venture E&P Pacific Stratus Energy Pacific Stratus Energy 30% Pacific Stratus Energy 70% 27.5 years August 17, 2029 Yes 20%
Minor Fields Chaparral Joint Venture E&P Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia 50% Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia S.A.S. 50% 28 years October 4, 2015 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Chenche Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia 70% Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia S.A.S. 30% 10 years December 28, 2013 Yes variable (8% to 25%)

 

143
 

 

Region Contract
Name
Type of
Agreement
Purpose Operator Partners Ownership
Percentage
Partnership Percentage Term of
Contract
Expiration
Date
Right of Reversion
upon Termination
Royalty
Catatumbo-Orinoquía Campo Rico Joint Venture E&P Emerald Energy PLC Sucursal Colombia Emerald Energy PLC Sucursal Colombia 50% Emerald Energy PLC Sucursal Colombia 50% 25 years May 24, 2027 Yes variable (8% to  25%)
Minor Fields Chípalo Joint Venture - Sole Risk E&P Pacific Stratus Energy Pacific Stratus Energy 0% Pacific Stratus Energy 100% 28 years February 27, 2026 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Dindal Joint Venture - Sole Risk E&P Pacific Stratus Energy Pacific Stratus Energy 0% Pacific Stratus Energy 100% 28 years March 22, 2021 Yes 20%
Minor Fields Entrerrios Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Union Temporal Andina Union Temporal Andina 61% for wells < 9,000 feet deep. 40%  + %PAP for wells > 9,000 feet deep, Unión Temporal Andina  39%  for wells < 9,000 feets deep.. 60% + %PAP for wells > 9,000 feets deep 10 years December 29, 2013 Yes variable (8% to 25%
Orient Caracara Joint Venture E&P CEPCOLSA CEPCOLSA 30% Cepcolsa 70% 28 years April 8, 2029 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Mid–Magdalena Valley Carare las Monas Joint Venture E&P PetroSantander (Colombia Inc) PetroSantander (Colombia Inc) 30% (Pozos Payoa West-ST y Corazón 09  se encuentran en solo riesgo 100% a cargo de la Asociada) Petrosantander (Colombia Inc). 70% Until economic limit Until economic limit Yes variable (20% and 8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Guachiría Joint Venture E&P Lewis Energy Lewis Energy 13% Lewis Energy 87% 28 years September 30, 2031 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Catatumbo-Orinoquía Casanare Joint Venture E&P Perenco Perenco - Hocol 64% (60% + %PAP) Hocol 12.4% (14.4%- %PAP)Perenco 23.6% (25.6%- %PAP) Until economic limit Until economic limit Yes 20%
Minor Fields La Punta Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia Volume 1 - 70%Volume 2 - (escalonada) 15% Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia S.A.S. Volumen de Desarrollo Volume 1 - 30%Volume 2 - (Amendment 2 escalonada 85%) 10 years (volumen 1) + 10 years  (volumen 2, amendment 2) December 28, 2013 (Amendment 2 August 3, 2020) Yes variable (8%  to 25%)
Minor Fields Las Quinchas Joint Venture - Sole Risk E&P Pacific Stratus Energy Pacific Stratus Energy 0% Pacific Stratus Energy 100% 28 years February 19, 2024 Yes Variable (8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Lebrija Joint Venture - Sole Risk E&P Petroleos del Norte S.A. Petroleos del Norte S.A. 0% Petroleos del Norte S.A. 100% 28 years May 15 , 2014 Yes 20%
Minor Fields Magangué Joint Venture E&P Solana Petroleum Exploration (Colombia Limited) Solana Petroleum Exploration (Colombia Limited) 58% Solana Petroleum Exploration (Colombia Limited)  42% 28 years December 31, 2017 Yes 20%
Minor Fields Maracas Joint Venture - Sole Risk E&P Texican Oil Ltd. Texican Oil Ltd. 0% Texican Oil Ltd. 100% 28 years March 5, 2024 Yes 20%
Catatumbo-Orinoquía Chipirón Joint Venture E&P Occidental de Colombia LLC Occidental de Colombia LLC and Occidental Andina LLC 30%   JIBA UNIFICADO : 34.14 + 0.1657 * (%PAP de ACN) Occidental de Colombia 35%Occidental Andina 35%(- %PAP promedio) 25 years February 13, 2028 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Nancy-Burdine- Maxine Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Union Temporal II&B Union Temporal II&B 41% Unión Temporal II&B 59% 10 years September  2, 2015 Yes 20%

 

 

144
 

 

Region Contract
Name
Type of
Agreement
Purpose Operator Partners Ownership
Percentage
Partnership Percentage Term of
Contract
Expiration
Date
Right of Reversion
upon Termination
Royalty
Minor Fields Opon Joint Venture E&P Compañía Operadora Petrocolombia SAS-COPP S.A.S Gas, Petróleo y derivados de Colombia S.A.S y Compañía Operadora Petrocolombia S.A.S COPP S.A.S Producción:53% Gas, Petróleo y derivados de Colombia S.A.S y Compañía Operadora Petrocolombia S.A.S COPP S.A.S 47% 28 years July 14, (Extension Amendment  until 2035) Yes variable (20% and 8% to 25%)
Joint Venture - Sole Risk 0% 100%
Catatumbo-Orinoquía Corocora Joint Venture E&P Perenco Hocol S.A - Perenco 56% Hocol S.A. 27.91%Perenco 16.09% Until economic limit Until economic limit Yes variable (20% and 8% to 25%)
Catatumbo-Orinoquía Cosecha Joint Venture E&P Occidental de Colombia LLC Occidental de Colombia LLC 30% Occidental de Colombia LLC 70% 28 years December 30, 2030 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Pavas-Cáchira Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Unión Temporal Ismocol, Joshi - Parko Unión Temporal Ismocol, Joshi - Parko 7% Unión Temporal I.J.P. 93% 10 years December 29, 2013 Yes 20%
Southern Santana Risk participation contract E&P GranTierra Energy Colombia Ltd. GranTierra Energy Colombia Ltd. 65% Gran Tierra Colombia 35% 28 years July 27, 2015 Yes 20%
Minor Fields Playón Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Serinpet Serinpet, DYAS COLOMBIA BV 53% Serinpet 9.4%   Dyas Colombia BV 37.6% 10 years July 12, 2015 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Catatumbo-Orinoquía Cravo Norte Joint Venture E&P Occidental de Colombia LLC Occidental de Colombia LLC and Occidental Andina LLC 55% + % PAP (71.50%) Occidental de Colombia 22.5% - %PAP (14.25%)Occidental Andina 22.5% - %PAP (14.25%) Until economic limit Until economic limit Yes variable (20% and 5% to 25%)
Minor Fields Puerto Barco Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Avante Ltd. Vetra Exploracion y Produccion Colombia - Avante Ltd. 6% Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia S.A.S. 47%   Avante Ltd. 47% 10 years December 29, 2013 Yes 20%
Minor Fields Quebrada Roja Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Campos de Producción Consortium Campos de Producción Consortium 54% Campos de Producción Consortium  46% 10 years October 15, 2016 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Río de Oro Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Avante Ltd. Vetra Exploracion y Produccion Colombia - Avante Ltd. 12% Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia S.A.S. 44% Avante Ltd. 44% 10 years December 29, 2013 Yes 20%
Southern Espinal Risk participation contract E&P Petrobras Petrobras / Cepsa 55% (R Factor applied) Petrobras Colombia Ltd. 30% Cepcolsa 15% 28 years October 19, 2015 Yes 20%
Minor Fields La Rompida Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Vetra Exploracion y Produccion Colombia Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia 12% Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia S.A.S. 88% 10 years (volumen 1) + 10 years  (volumen 2, amendment 2) Volume 1 - December 28, 2013Volume 2  (Extension Amendment - August 8, 2023) Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Catatumbo-Orinoquía Estero Joint Venture E&P Perenco Perenco - Hocol 89% Perenco 4.02% Hocol 6.98% Until economic limit Until economic limit yes 20%
Minor Fields San Luis Joint Venture E&P Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia S.A.S. Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia S.A.S 50% Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia S.A.S. 50% 28 years May 8, 2014 Yes 20%
Catatumbo-Orinoquía Garcero Joint Venture E&P Perenco Perenco - Hocol 76% Perenco 8.78% Hocol 15.22% Until economic limit Until economic limit Yes variable (20% and 8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Tapir Joint Venture - Sole Risk E&P Petrolco S.A. Petrolco S.A. and Doreal Energy 0% Petrolco S.A. 88.334% and Doreal 11.666% 28 years February 5, 2023 Yes 20%
Northeastern Guajira Joint Venture E&P Chevron Petroleum Company Chevron Petroleum Company 57% Chevron Petroleum Company 43% Until economic limit Until economic limit Yes 20%
Minor Fields Toca Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I Campos de Producción Consortium Campos de Producción Consortium 58% Campos de Producción Consortium 42% 10 years March 22, 2016 Yes variable (8% to 25%)

 

145
 

 

Region Contract
Name
Type of
Agreement
Purpose Operator Partners Ownership
Percentage
Partnership Percentage Term of
Contract
Expiration
Date
Right of Reversion
upon Termination
Royalty
Minor Fields Tolima B Joint Venture E&P Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia S.A.S. Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia S.A.S. 54% (Extension amendment) Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia S.A.S. 46% (Extension amendment) 28 years + 10 years extension June 11 (Extension Amendment until 2024) Yes 20%
Southern Guayuyaco Joint Venture E&P GranTierra Energy Colombia Ltd. GranTierra Energy Colombia Ltd. 30% Gran Tierra Energy Colombia Ltd. 70% 27.5 years March 31, 2030 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Colorado Services and Technical Cooperation Production Universidad Industrial de Santander Universidad Industrial de Santander 100% Universidad Industrial de Santander 0% 10 years June 1, 2016 Yes 20%
Minor Fields El Piñal Joint Venture - Sole Risk E&P PetroSantander (Colombia Inc) PetroSantander (Colombia Inc) 0% PetroSantander (Colombia Inc) 100% 28 years July 28, 2018 Yes 20%
Minor Fields Fortuna Joint Venture - Sole Risk E&P Emerald Energy PLC Sucursal Colombia Emerald Energy PLC Sucursal Colombia 5% Emerald Energy PLC Sucursal Colombia 95% 28 years December 18, 2031 Yes variable (20% and 8% to 25%)
Mid–Magdalena Valley La Cira Business Cooperation E&P Ecopetrol S.A. Occidental Andina LLC and Ecopetrol S.A. 52% + %PAP (63%) Occidental Andina LLC  48%  - % PAP (37%) Until economic limit Until economic limit Yes variable (20% and 8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Buganviles Joint Venture - Sole Risk E&P Pacific Stratus Energy Pacific Stratus Energy 0% Pacific Stratus Energy 100% 28 years November 17, 2028 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Maná Joint Venture E&P Interoil Interoil 30% Interoil Colombia E&P 70% 25 years November 11, 2028 (oil) Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Hato Nuevo Discovered Undeveloped Field CDND/I EMPESA - NTC Consortium EMPESA -NTC Consortium 41% EMPESA -NTC Consortium 59% 10 years May 17, 2017 Yes variable (32% and 8% to 25%)
Southern Matambo Joint Venture E&P Emerald Energy PLC Sucursal Colombia Emerald Energy PLC Sucursal Colombia 50% Emerald Energy PLC Sucursal Colombia 50% 28 years November 29, 2024 Yes 20%
Catatumbo-Orinoquía Área Casanare (Ranchohermoso) SPBR SPBR CANACOL N/A 100% N/A Until economic limit Until economic limit Yes 20%
Catatumbo-Orinoquía Ranchohermoso Operation Agreement Operation Agreement CANACOL CANACOL 70%+ % PAP (75.38%) CANACOL 30% - %PAP (24.62%) Until economic limit Until economic limit Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Mid–Magdalena Valley Nare Joint Venture E&P Mansarovar Energy Colombia Ltd. Mansarovar Energy Colombia Ltd. 50% Mansarovar Energy Colombia 50% 28 years November 5, 2021 Yes variable (20% and 8% to 25%)
Joint Venture - Sole Risk Jazmin R05 Well0% 100%
Southern Neiva Incremental Production E&P Ecopetrol S.A. Petrominerales 100% basica  y 32% Incremental  (R Factor) Petrominerales 68% (incremental only - R Factor) 22 years June 5, 2023 Yes variable (32% and 8% to 25%)
Southern Orito Incremental Production E&P Ecopetrol S.A. Petrominerales 100% basica  y 21% incremental Petrominerales 79% (incremental only) 22 years June 5, 2023 Yes variable (20% and 8% to 25%)
Catatumbo-Orinoquía Orocué Joint Venture E&P Perenco Perenco and Hocol 63% Perenco 13.53%  Hocol 23.47% Until economic limit Until economic limit Yes 20%
Southern Ortega Incremental Production E&P Ecopetrol S.A. Hocol S.A. 100% basica y 31% incremental Hocol S.A. 69% (Incremental Production) 22 years February 28, 2023 Yes variable (20% and 8% to 25%)
Mid–Magdalena Valley Palagua Incremental Production E&P Union Temporal IJP Union Temporal Ismocol, Joshi- Parko 50% Unión Temporal I.J.P. 50% 22 years July 14, 2023 Yes variable (20% and 8% to 25%)
Northeastern Piedemonte Joint Venture E&P EQUIÓN EQUIÓN 50% EQUIÓN 50% 28 years February 29, 2020 Yes 20%
Orient Pirirí Joint Venture E&P Meta Petroleum Corp. Meta Petroleum Corp. 50% Meta Petroleum Corp. 50% 28 years June 30, 2016 Yes 20%
Northeastern Recetor Joint Venture E&P EQUIÓN EQUIÓN - Santiago Oil Co. 50% EQUIÓN 40% Santiago Oil Company 10% 28 years May 29, 2017 Yes 20%

 

146
 

 

Region Contract
Name
Type of
Agreement
Purpose Operator Partners Ownership
Percentage
Partnership Percentage Term of
Contract
Expiration
Date
Right of Reversion
upon Termination
Royalty
Northeastern Río Chitamena Joint Venture E&P EQUIÓN EQUIÓN. -Santiago Oil Co. - TEPMA 50% EQUIÓN 19% Santiago Oil Co. 12% TEPMA 19% 28 years January 31, 2019 Yes 20%
Minor Fields Río Opia Joint Venture E&P Interoil Interoil 30% Interoil Colombia E&P 70% 28 years June 23, 2030 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Catatumbo-Orinoquía Rondón Joint Venture E&P Occidental de Colombia LLC Occidental de Colombia LLC and Occidental Andina LLC 50% Occidental de Colombia LLC 25% Occidental Andina 25% LLC 28 years January 8, 2023 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Orient Rubiales Risk participation contract E&P Meta Petroleum Corp. Meta Petroleum Corp. 60% Meta Petroleum Corp. 40% 28 years June 30, 2016 Yes 20%
Southern San Jacinto Joint Venture (La Cañada Norte) E&P Hocol S.A. Hocol S.A. Petrobras Cepcolsa 50% Hocol S.A. 18.335% Petrobras 15% Cepcolsa 16.665% 28 years December 22, 2024 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Joint Venture -Sole Risk (La Hocha) E&P Hocol S.A. Hocol S.A. 0% Campo La Hocha 100 % Hocol S.A. Yes variable (5% to 25%)
Southern Suroriente Incremental Production E&P Vetra Exploración y Producción Colombia S.A.S. Consorcio Colombia Energy 48% Consorcio Colombia Energy: 52% 22 years June 11, 2024 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Northeastern Tauramena Joint Venture E&P EQUIÓN EQUIÓN. - Santiago Oil Co. - TEPMA 50% Equion 19%Santiago Oil 12%TEPMA 19% 28 years July 3, 2016 Yes 20%
Mid–Magdalena Valley Tisquirama Joint Venture E&P Petroleos del Norte S.A. Petroleos del Norte S.A – PetroSantander (Colombia Inc.) Campo Los Ángeles: 68% (60% + %PAP) Petroleos del norte 32% (40% - PAP%) Until economic limit Until economic limit Yes variable (20% and 8% to 25%)
Campo Santa Lucía: 70% (60% + %PAP) PetroSantander (Colombia Inc.) 15% and Petroleos del Norte 15% (40% - PAP%)
Campo Querubín: 68% (60% + %PAP) PetroSantander (Colombia Inc.) 16% and Petroleos del norte 16% (40% - PAP%)
Campo Serafín: 60% (60% + %PAP) PetroSantander (Colombia Inc.) 20% and Petroleos del norte 20% (40% - PAP%)
Southern Doima Joint Venture E&P Hocol S.A. Hocol S.A 39% Hocol S.A. 61% 40 years February 16, 2041 Yes 6.4% Gas
Mid–Magdalena Valley CRC-2004-01 (Guariquies) Risk participation contract exploration and productions (CRC) E&P Ecopetrol S.A. Ramshorn 55% Ramshorn 45% 25 years May 24, 2029 Yes variable  (8% to 25%)
Southern Río Paez Joint Venture (La Cañada Norte) E&P Hocol S.A. Hocol S.A. Petrobras Cepcolsa 50% Hocol S.A. 18.335% Petrobras 15% Cepcolsa 16.665% 25 years April 26, 2026 Yes variable (8% to 25%)
Joint Venture - Sole Risk ( Campo La Hocha) E&P Hocol S.A. Hocol S.A. 0% Campo La Hocha 100 % Hocol S.A. variable (5% to 25%)
Minor Fields Río Seco Joint Venture - Sole Risk E&P Pacific Stratus Energy Pacific Stratus Energy 0% Pacific Stratus Energy 100% 28 years August 21, 2023 yes 20%

 

147
 

 

Region Contract
Name
Type of
Agreement
Purpose Operator Partners Ownership
Percentage
Partnership Percentage Term of
Contract
Expiration
Date
Right of Reversion
upon Termination
Royalty
Mid–Magdalena Valley Alianza Tecnológica Casabe Technological Alliance agreement E&P Ecopetrol S.A. Schlumberger 100% Schlumberger 0% 16 years April 26, 2020 yes variable (20% and 8% to 25%)
Minor Fields Río Magdalena Joint Venture - Sole risk E&P GranTierra Energy Colombia Ltd. GranTierra Energy Colombia Ltd. 0% Grantierra Energy Colombia 100% 28 years February 8, 2030 Yes variable (20% and 8% to 25%)

 

148
 

 

ANNEX III

DESCRIPTION OF EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION CONTRACTS (EXPLORATION PHASE)

 

Contract
Name
Type of
Agreement
Purpose Operator Partners Ownership
Percentage
Term of
Contract
Expiration
Date
Ecopetrol’s Right of
Reversion
upon Termination
Royalty
CPE 8 TEA Technical Evaluation TALISMAN TALISMAN ECP 50% 3 YEARS plus extension SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 NO N/A
CPO 11 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS DECEMBER 18, 2038 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
LL 4 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS plus extension FEBRUARY 10, 2041 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
LL 9 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS plus extension OCTOBER 6, 2039 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
LL 14 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS plus extension OCTOBER 6, 2040 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
ODISEA E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS plus extension JANUARY 13, 2040 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
CAÑO SUR E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS plus extension DECEMBER 1, 2035 NO 8% to 25%
URIBANTE E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS FEBRUARY 17, 2037 NO 8% to 25%
CPE 2 TEA Technical Evaluation ECOPETROL SHELL ECP 50% 2 YEARS plus extension APRIL 26, 2013 NO N/A
CPE 4 TEA Technical Evaluation ECOPETROL SHELL ECP 50% 2 YEARS plus extension FEBRUARY 18, 2013 NO N/A
CPO 8 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS plus extension MARCH 17, 2040 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
CPO 9 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL TALISMAN ECP 55% 30 YEARS plus extension OCTOBER 7, 2039 NO 8% to 25%
CPO 10 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS JUNE 17, 2039 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
LLA 6 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS FORCE MAJOR - UNDETERMINED NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
LLA 8 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS FORCE MAJOR - UNDETERMINED NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
LLA 37 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS AUGUST 31, 2041 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
LLA 38 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS FORCE MAJOR - UNDETERMINED NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
LLA 39 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS plus extension JULY 25, 2039 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
LLA 52 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS FORCE MAJOR - UNDETERMINED NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
CAT 3 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS UNDETERMINED - Phase 0 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
AMA 4 TEA Technical Evaluation ECOPETROL HOCOL ECP 50% 3 YEARS UNDETERMINED - Phase 0 NO N/A
RC 4 E&P Exploration and Production EQUION EQUION AND PETROBRAS ECP 32% 30 YEARS NOVEMBER 28, 2037 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
RC 5 E&P Exploration and Production EQUION EQUION AND PETROBRAS ECP 32% 30 YEARS NOVEMBER 28, 2037 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
SSJN 4 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS plus extension AUGUST 18, 2040 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
FUERTE NORTE E&P Exploration and Production ANADARKO ANADARKO ECP 50% 30 YEARS plus extension APRIL 15, 2041 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
FUERTE SUR E&P Exploration and Production ANADARKO ANADARKO ECP 50% 30 YEARS plus extension APRIL 15, 2041 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
RC 6 E&P Exploration and Production PETROBRAS PETROBRAS AND HESS ECP 30% 30 YEARS plus extension MARCH 14, 2038 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place

 

149
 

 

Contract
Name
Type of
Agreement
Purpose Operator Partners Ownership
Percentage
Term of
Contract
Expiration
Date
Ecopetrol’s Right of
Reversion
upon Termination
Royalty
RC 7 E&P Exploration and Production PETROBRAS PETROBRAS AND HESS ECP 30% 30 YEARS plus extension MARCH 14, 2038 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
RC 8 E&P Exploration and Production ONGC VIDESH ONGC VIDESH LIMITED AND PETROBRAS ECP 40% 30 YEARS NOVEMBER 30, 2037 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
RC 9 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL ONGC VIDESH LIMITED ECP 50% 30 YEARS NOVEMBER 30, 2037 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
RC 10 E&P Exploration and Production ONGC VIDESH ONGC VIDESH LIMITED ECP 50% 30 YEARS NOVEMBER 30, 2037 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
RC 11 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL REPSOL ECP 50% 30 YEARS NOVEMBER 30, 2037 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
RC 12 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL REPSOL ECP 50% 30 YEARS NOVEMBER 30, 2037 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
TAYRONA E&P Exploration and Production PETROBRAS PETROBRAS AND REPSOL ECP 30% 34 YEARS plus extension MAY 12, 2040 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
TUMOFF 3 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS NOVEMBER 16, 2041 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
SSJS 1 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL SK ENERGY ECP 70% 30 YEARS DECEMBER 16, 2041 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
PURPLE ANGEL E&P Exploration and Production ANADARKO ANADARKO ECP 50% 30 YEARS UNDETERMINED - Phase 0 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
GUAOFF 1 TEA Technical Evaluation REPSOL REPSOL ECP 50% 3 YEARS UNDETERMINED - Phase 0 NO N/A
COL 5 TEA Technical Evaluation ANADARKO ANADARKO ECP 50% 3 YEARS UNDETERMINED - Phase 0 NO N/A
URA 4 E&P Exploration and Production ANADARKO ANADARKO ECP 50% 30 YEARS UNDETERMINED - Phase 0 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
SILVESTRE E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 29 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS OCTOBER 12, 2042 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
BOROJÓ NORTH E&P E&P RELIANCE RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED ECP 20% 30 YEARS N/A NO 8% to 25%
BOROJÓ SOUTH E&P E&P RELIANCE RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED ECP 20% 30 YEARS N/A NO 8% to 25%
VMM 6 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS APRIL 07, 2039 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
VMM 32 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL CEMENTACIONES PETROLERAS VENEZOLANAS (CPVEN) ECP 51% 30 YEARS APRIL 17, 2041 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
SAMICHAY A E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS FORCE MAJOR - UNDETERMINED NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
SAMICHAY B E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS JUNE 13/ 2041 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
VMM 5 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 39 YEARS UNDETERMINED - Phase 0 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
VMM 16 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 39 YEARS UNDETERMINED - Phase 0 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
VMM 29 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL EXXON MOBIL ECP 50% 39 YEARS UNDETERMINED - Phase 0 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
COR 46 TEA Technical Evaluation EXXON MOBIL EXXON MOBIL ECP 50% 3 YEARS UNDETERMINED - Phase 0 NO N/A
COR 62 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL EXXON MOBIL ECP 50% 39 YEARS UNDETERMINED - Phase 0 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
PUT 13 E&P Exploration and Production ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 30 YEARS UNDETERMINED - Phase 0 NO The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place

 

150
 

 

Contract
Name
Type of
Agreement
Purpose Operator Partners Ownership
Percentage
Term of
Contract
Expiration
Date
Ecopetrol’s Right of
Reversion
upon Termination
Royalty
PUT 17 TEA Technical Evaluation ECOPETROL NONE ECP 100% 3 YEARS UNDETERMINED - Phase 0 NO N/A
CATLEYA SHARED RISK AGREEMENT Exploration and Production ECOPETROL REPSOL ECP 34% or 44% (Clause 20) 28 YEARS and 30 YEARS (GAS) THE EFFECTIVE DATE HAS NOT OCCURED - UNDETERMINED YES The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
MUNDO NUEVO JOINT VENTURE Exploration and Production HOCOL HOCOL- E&P COLOMBIE AND TALISMAN 30% 28 YEARS and 30 YEARS (GAS) FORCE MAJOR - UNDETERMINED YES The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place
QUIFA RISK PARTICIPATION CONTRACT Exploration and Production META PETROLEUM CORP META PETROLEUM CORP 40% + pap 28 YEARS and 30 YEARS (GAS) DECEMBER 22, 2031 YES 8% to 25%
CONDOR JOINT VENTURE Exploration and Production LUKOIL LUKOIL ECP 30% 28 YEARS and 30 YEARS (GAS) JUNE 6, 2030 YES 8% to 25%
RIO RANCHERIA JOINT VENTURE Exploration and Production DRUMMOND DRUMMOND ECP 30% 36 YEARS MAY 24, 2037 YES The applicable law is the law in force when the discovery takes place

 

151
 

 

SIGNATURES

 

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

 

  Ecopetrol S.A.
     
  By: /s/ Adriana M. Echeverri
    Name: Adriana M. Echeverri
    Title: Chief Financial Officer
     
  By: /s/ Javier G. Gutíerrez
    Name: Javier G. Gutiérrez
Dated:  April 29, 2013   Title: Chief Executive Officer

 

152
 

 

Ecopetrol S.A. and Subsidiaries

 

Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

 

F- 1
 

 

Ecopetrol S.A. and Subsidiaries

 

Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

 

Contents

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – KPMG Ltda   F-3
     
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – PricewaterhouseCoopers Ltda   F-4
     
Consolidated Balance Sheets   F-5
     
Consolidated Statements of Financial, Economic, Social and Environmental Activities   F-6
     
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity   F-7
     
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows   F-8
     
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements   F-9

 

F- 2
 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Ecopetrol S.A.:

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ecopetrol S.A. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of Financial, Economic, Social and Environmental Activities, Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, and Cash Flows for the years then ended. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in ITEM 15 of the FORM 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in Colombia, promulgated by the National Accounting Office ( Contaduría General de la Nación   or CGN). Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in COSO.

 

Accounting principles generally accepted for Colombian Government Entities vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Information relating to the nature and effects of such differences is presented in Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

/s/ KPMG Ltda.

 

Bogotá, Colombia

April 29, 2013

 

F- 3
 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Ecopetrol S. A.

 

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of financial, economic, social and environmental activities, of changes in shareholders’ equity and of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010 present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Ecopetrol S.A. and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles for Colombian Government Entities issued by the Contaduría General de la Nación   . These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in Colombia and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Our audit of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

  

Accounting principles generally accepted for Colombian Government Entities vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Information relating to the nature and effects of such differences is presented in Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Ltda.

 

Bogotá, Colombia

July 15, 2011

 

F- 4
 

 

ECOPETROL S.A. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheet

As at December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Expressed in millions of Colombian pesos)

 

    As at December 31  
    2012     2011  
Assets                
                 
Current assets:                
Cash and cash equivalents (notes 2 and 3)   $ 7,940,690     $ 6,779,937  
Investments (notes 2 and 4)     1,371,559       1,337,602  
Accounts and notes receivable, net (notes 2 and 5)     5,261,501       4,636,536  
Inventories, net (note 6)     2,806,282       2,761,605  
Advances and deposits (notes 2 and 7)     5,378,926       3,459,942  
Deferred tax asset (note 17)     14,014       10,019  
Prepaid expenses (note 8)     110,655       52,374  
Total current assets     22,883,627       19,038,015  
                 
Long term assets:                
Investments (notes 2 and 4)     5,812,223       5,474,805  
Accounts and notes receivable, net (notes 2 and 5)     503,451       407,227  
Advances and deposits (notes 2 and 7)     172,708       144,482  
Deposits held in trust (note 9)     478,810       321,361  
Property, plant and equipment, net (note 10)     37,134,955       30,033,380  
Natural and environmental resources, net (note 11)     18,568,730       15,440,787  
Deferred charges (notes 12 and 17)     3,646,421       3,950,060  
Other assets (notes 2 and 13)     4,030,763       3,891,391  
Valuations (note 14)     20,647,890       13,575,878  
Total assets   $ 113,879,578     $ 92,277,386  
                 
Liabilities and Equity                
                 
Current liabilities:                
Financial obligations (notes 2 and 15)     2,239,139       831,594  
Accounts payable and related parties (notes 2 and 16)     10,905,375       4,683,148  
Taxes, contributions and duties payable (note 17)     7,859,948       8,309,180  
Labor and pension obligations (note 18)     256,929       233,322  
Estimated liabilities and provision (notes 2 and 19)     1,872,335       1,695,193  
Total current liabilities   $ 23,133,726     $ 15,752,437  
                 
Long term liabilities:                
Financial obligations (notes 2 and 15)     11,466,686       7,969,978  
Accounts payable and related parties (notes 2 and 16)     662,472       518,143  
Labor and pension obligations (note 18)     4,070,744       3,190,229  
Taxes, contributions and duties payable (note 17)     555,054       1,035,971  
Estimated liabilities and provision (notes 2 and 19)     4,376,004       4,084,829  
Other long-term liabilities (notes 2 and 20)     2,271,844       2,784,313  
Total liabilities     46,536,530       35,335,900  
                 
Non-controlling interest (note 21)     2,602,167       2,252,631  
Equity:                
(Note 22 and see attached statement)     64,740,881       54,688,855  
Total liabilities and equity   $ 113,879,578     $ 92,277,386  
                 
Memorandum accounts (note 23) :                
Debtor   $ 144,971,427     $ 130,221,872  
Creditor   $ (115,482,125 )   $ (111,784,600 )

 

See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

F- 5
 

 

ECOPETROL S.A. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Financial, Economic, Social and Environmental Activities

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

(Expressed in millions of Colombian pesos, except for net income per share, which are expressed in Colombian pesos)

 

    2012     2011     2010  
                   
Revenues or Sales  (note 24):                        
National sales   $ 24,361,913     $ 23,554,629     $ 18,205,859  
Foreign sales     44,490,089       42,412,885       23,883,886  
Total Revenues or Sales     68,852,002       65,967,514       42,089,745  
                         
Cost of sales (note 25)     40,535,508       36,704,584       25,960,456  
Gross income     28,316,494       29,262,930       16,129,289  
Operating expenses (note 26):                        
Administration     874,980       1,018,917       603,523  
Marketing and projects     3,235,224       2,371,033       2,778,318  
Operating income     24,206,290       25,872,980       12,747,448  
                         
Non-operating income (expenses):                        
Financial expenses, net (note 27)     (167,889 )     (904,302 )     37,789  
Pension expenses (note 28)     (948,455 )     (706,298 )     (377,626 )
Inflation gain (note 29)     97,663       21,836       22,030  
Other expenses, net (note 30)     (855,908 )     (642,784 )     (937,024 )
Income before income tax and non-controlling interest     22,331,701       23,641,432       11,492,617  
                         
Income tax  (note 17)     7,095,874       7,561,634       3,201,041  
Deferred tax (note 17)     37,521       394,087       37,609  
                         
Earnings before non-controlling interest     15,198,306       15,685,711       8,253,967  
                         
Non-controlling interest     (419,359 )     (233,377 )     (107,496 )
                         
Net income for the period   $ 14,778,947     $ 15,452,334     $ 8,146,471  
                         
Net income per share   $ 359.44     $ 380.27     $ 201.28  

 

See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

F- 6
 

  

ECOPETROL S.A. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Expressed in millions of Colombian pesos except dividends per share)

 

    Subscribed
and paid
capital
    Additional
paid-in
capital
    Legal and
other
reserves
    Incorporated
institutional
equity
    Equity
method
surplus
    Valuation
surplus
    Public
Accounting
Regime
effect
    Accumulated
Retained
earnings
    Total equity  
                                                       
Balance as at December 31, 2010   $ 10,118,128       4,720,508       6,732,738       157,352       1,178,418       10,977,041       (702,475 )     8,146,471       41,328,181  
Distribution of dividends ($145 per share)     -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (5,868,514 )     (5,868,514 )
Capitalization - second round share issuance and placement     161,047       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       161,047  
Subscribed capital receivable and additional paid-in capital     -       2,222,459       -       -       -       -       -       -       2,222,459  
Additional paid-in capital - called in guarantees     -       (154,823 )     -       -       -       -       -       -       (154,823 )
Valuation surplus     -       -       -       -       -       1,694,655       -       -       1,694,655  
Property, plant and equipment revaluation     -       -       -       -       -       -       6,114       -       6,114  
Legal reserve appropriation     -       -       834,610       -       -       -       -       (834,610 )     -  
Investment program reserve appropriation     -       -       1,065,465       -       -       -       -       (1,065,465 )     -  
Regulatory Decree 2336/95 reserve appropriation     -       -       96,695       -       -       -       -       (96,695 )     -  
Dividend payment (shares issued in 2011) reserve appropriation     -       -       449,904       -       -       -       -       (449,904 )     -  
Use of reserves to pay dividends     -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (30,909 )     (30,909 )
Addition to incorporated institutional equity     -       -       -       16,728       -       -       -       -       16,728  
Equity method capital surplus and exchange rate adjustment     -       -       -       -       (11,608 )     -       -       -       (11,608 )
Unrealized earnings     -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (126,809 )     (126,809 )
Net income for the year     -       -       -       -       -       -       -       15,452,334       15,452,334  
Balance as at December 31, 2011     10,279,175       6,788,144       9,179,412       174,080       1,166,810       12,671,696       (696,361 )     15,125,899       54,688,855  
                                                                         
Distribution of dividends ($300 per share)     -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (12,335,009 )     (12,335,009 )
Additional paid-in capital     -       10,390       -       -       -       -       -       -       10,390  
Additional paid-in capital receivable     -       155,713       -       -       -       -       -       -       155,713  
Valuation surplus     -       -       -       -       -       7,103,965       -       -       7,103,965  
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment     -       -       -       -       -       -       680,129       -       680,129  
Legal reserve appropriation     -       -       187,958       -       -       -       -       (187,958 )     -  
Regulatory Decree 2336/95 reserve appropriation     -       -       1,829,362       -       -       -       -       (1,829,362 )     -  
Corporate Group unrealized reserve appropriation     -       -       2,123,538       -       -       -       -       (2,123,538 )     -  
Transportation infrastructure integrity strengthening     -       -       605,135       -       -       -       -       (605,135 )     -  
Release of the Corporate Group's reserves for unrealized gains     -       -       (1,086,070 )     -       -       -       -       1,086,070       -  
Release of the dividend payment (shares issued in 2011) reserves     -       -       (449,904 )     -       -       -       -       449,904       -  
Release of the Regulatory Decree 2336/95 reserves for the previous year     -       -       (96,695 )     -       -       -       -       96,695       -  
Equity method capital surplus and exchange rate adjustment     -       -       -       -       (342,109 )     -       -       -       (342,109 )
Net income for the year     -       -       -       -       -       -       -       14,778,947       14,778,947  
Balance as at December 31, 2012   $ 10,279,175       6,954,247       12,292,736       174,080       824,701       19,775,661       (16,232 )     14,456,513       64,740,881  

 

See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements  

 

F- 7
 

 

ECOPETROL S.A. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

(Expressed in millions of Colombian pesos)

 

 

    2012     2011     2010  
Cash flows from operating activities:                  
Net income for the year   $ 14,778,947     $ 15,452,334     $ 8,146,471  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash  provided  by operating activities:                        
Non-controlling  interest     419,359       233,377       107,495  
Deferred income tax, net     37,521       394,087       37,609  
Property, plant and equipment depreciation     2,027,658       1,960,007       1,624,009  
Amortizations:                        
Natural resources     2,682,955       2,306,269       2,003,771  
Facility abandonment     312,252       285,814       241,842  
Pension liabilities for health and education     869,491       517,345       166,211  
Intangibles     291,884       295,670       189,261  
Deferred charges     154,101       111,811       107,422  
Deferred monetary correction, net     (97,663 )     (21,836 )     (22,030 )
Allowances:                        
Accounts receivable     87,187       32,422       169,789  
Inventory     14,459       8,505       9,743  
Property, plant and equipment     315,627       41,948       227,266  
Legal disputes and proceedings     593,028       360,351       125,888  
Pension transfer     -       241,624       -  
Other     23,087       122,395       19,834  
Recovery of allowances                        
Accounts receivable     (225 )     (365 )     (68,772 )
Inventories     (11,966 )     (3,263 )     (29,481 )
Property, plant and equipment     (159,833 )     (46,019 )     (55,717 )
Legal disputes and proceedings     (258,784 )     (229,345 )     (80,237 )
Other     (283,283 )     (387,117 )     (138,397 )
Property, plant and equipment write-off     -       418       3,395  
Property, plant and equipment retirement loss     127       -       38,945  
Natural and environmental resource write-off loss     34,191       -       39,668  
Other asset write-off loss     -       300       287,918  
Equity method     (125,277 )     (141,275 )     (82,772 )
Net changes in asset and liabilities:                        
Accounts  and  notes receivables     (2,517,198 )     (1,324,033 )     794,512  
Inventories     (390,847 )     (561,846 )     (129,823 )
Deferred and other assets     856,001       (2,165,464 )     698,423  
Accounts payable     2,318,922       (121,422 )     1,248,736  
Tax payable     (730,923 )     5,073,370       (618,440 )
Labor and pension obligations     34,632       (85,757 )     (26,737 )
Estimated liabilities and provision     253,832       86,805       (64,028 )
Other long-term liabilities     (998,029 )     559,203       (507,467 )
Net cash provided by operating activities   $ 20,531,233     $ 22,996,312     $ 14,464,307  
Cash flows from investing activities:                        
Payment and advances for the acquisition of companies,                        
net of acquired cash     -       (868,954 )     (1,163,131 )
Increase in investments     (15,281,566 )     (11,685,030 )     (11,808,784 )
Redemption and sale of investments     14,725,312       9,861,330       10,578,200  
Investment in natural and environmental resources     (5,615,306 )     (4,311,149 )     (3,874,824 )
Additions to property, plant and equipment     (9,852,556 )     (10,189,522 )     (6,445,151 )
Proceeds from  sales of property and equipment     -       -       4,751  
Net cash used in investing activities   $ (16,024,116 )   $ (17,193,325 )   $ (12,708,939 )
                         
Cash flows financing activities:                        
Non-controlling interest     (69,823 )     1,027,567       (562,855 )
Financial obligations     5,110,249       (109,191 )     2,761,449  
Capitalizations     -       2,228,683       525  
Dividends     (8,386,790 )     (5,896,886 )     (3,789,828 )
Net cash used in financing activities   $ (3,346,364 )   $ (2,749,827 )   $ (1,590,709 )
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents     1,160,753       3,053,159       164,659  
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year     6,779,937       3,726,778       3,562,119  
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year   $ 7,940,690     $ 6,779,937     $ 3,726,778  

 

See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

F- 8
 

 

Ecopetrol S.A. and Subsidiaries

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

(Amounts are expressed in millions of Colombian pesos, except amounts stated in other currencies; exchange rates and income per share, which are expressed in Colombian pesos – throughout these financial statements pesos or $ refer to Colombian pesos and U.S. dollar refers to United States dollars)

 

(1) Economic entity and principal accounting policies and practices

 

Reporting entity

 

ECOPETROL S.A. (hereinafter Ecopetrol or the Company) was constituted by Law 165 of 1948 and transformed through Extraordinary Decree 1760 of 2003 (as well as Decree 409 of 2006) and Law 1118 of 2006 into a state-owned stock company and then into a mixed economy Company of a commercial nature, at the national level, linked to the Ministry of Mines and Energy, for an indefinite period. Ecopetrol’s corporate purpose is the development, in Colombia or abroad, of commercial or industrial activities arising from or related to the exploration, production, refining, transportation, storage, distribution, and selling of hydrocarbons, their by-products and associated products, as well as subsidiary operations, connected or complementary to these activities, in accordance with applicable regulations. Ecopetrol’s principal domicile is Bogota and it may establish subsidiaries, branches and agencies in Colombia or abroad.

 

Pursuant to Transformation Decree 1760 of 2003, all administration of the Colombian nation’s hydrocarbon reserves, as well as the administration of non-strategic assets represented by stocks and shares in companies, were split from Ecopetrol. Furthermore, Ecopetrol’s basic structure was changed and two entities were created: a) the Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos (ANH) was created to issue and develop Colombian oil policy from that point forward (formerly the responsibility of Ecopetrol), and b) Sociedad Promotora de Energía de Colombia S.A ., which received the non-strategic assets owned by Ecopetrol.

 

Law 1118 of December 27, 2006 changed the legal nature of Ecopetrol and authorized the Company to issue shares to be placed on the market and acquired by Colombian individuals or legal entities. Once the shares corresponding to 10.1% of the authorized capital were issued and placed, at the end of 2007, the Company became a public-private entity of a commercial nature, at the national level, linked to the Ministry of Mines and Energy.

 

Ecopetrol entered into a deposit agreement with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as depositary, for the issuance of ADSs evidenced by ADRs. Each of the ADSs represents 20 of Ecopetrol’s common shares or the right to receive 20 common shares of Ecopetrol.

 

On September 12, 2008, Ecopetrol submitted an application to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to register and list the Company’s ADSs evidenced by ADRs on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The Company’s ADSs began trading on the NYSE under the symbol “EC” on September 18, 2008.

 

On December 3, 2009, the Comisión Nacional Supervisora de Empresas y Valores del Perú (CONASEV) (Peruvian National Commission of Companies and Securities) approved the listing of Ecopetrol’s ADRs on the Lima Stock Exchange and the registration of such securities with the Public Registry of the Securities Market. The ADRs began trading on the Lima Stock Exchange on December 4, 2009 in the Peruvian market under the symbol “EC”.

 

On August 13, 2010, Ecopetrol began trading its ADRs on the Toronto Stock Exchange – Canada, one of the biggest in the world in the energy sector. Thus, Ecopetrol became the first Colombian company to be listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

 

Between July 27 and August 17, 2011, Ecopetrol carried out the second placement of its public share offering, authorized by Law 1118 of 2006. As a result of this process, 644,185,868 shares were placed at a nominal price of $3,700 per share, for a total amount of $2,383,488. The common shares were registered with the National Registry of Securities and Issuers in accordance with Decree 2555 of 2010. After this, the Colombian National Government’s equity participation in Ecopetrol was 88.49%.

 

On February 13, 2008, Ecopetrol S.A. announced that it had become the parent company in the Group (the « Group »), with the following subsidiaries: Black Gold Re Limited, Ecopetrol Oleo é Gas do Brasil Ltda., Ecopetrol del Perú S.A., and Ecopetrol America Inc. Subsequently, Andean Chemicals Ltd., parent company of Bioenergy and an investor in Propilco S.A., which in turn is the parent company of Compounding and Masterbatching Industry Ltd. (Comai Ltd.), joined the Group.

 

Similarly, in 2009, the Group was joined by: ODL Finance, which is in turn the parent company of Oleoducto de los Llanos; Hocol Petroleum Limited, parent company of Homcol Cayman Inc and Hocol Limited, the Colombian branch of which is Hocol S.A.; Ecopetrol Transportation Company, the parent company of Ecopetrol Pipelines International Ltd., Oleoducto Central S.A., Oleoducto de Colombia S.A., and finally, Ecopetrol Global Energy and Refinería de Cartagena S.A.

 

On September 20, 2010, Ecopetrol S.A. announced the setting up of a Group with Oleoducto Bicentenario de Colombia S.A.S. as a subsidiary.

 

On January 17, 2011, Ecopetrol S.A. set up a Group with Ecopetrol Capital S.L.U., Ecopetrol Capital AG and Ecopetrol Transportation Investments Ltd., domiciled outside of Colombia.

 

F- 9
 

 

On February 23, 2011, Ecopetrol S.A. set up control over the following subsidiaries: Colombia Pipelines Limited, Equión Energía Limited, Santiago Oil Co, Santiago Oil Company and Santiago Pipelines Co.

 

In December 2011, the Board of Directors of Andean Chemicals Ltd, approved the capitalization of a liability (capital plus interest) with Ecopetrol S.A. Andean placed 615,677,799 ordinary shares at a nominal value of US$1 per share for this process. The liability was originated by a loan contract between Andean and Ecopetrol in May 2009, to acquire the Refinería de Cartagena through Andean Ltd as an investment vehicle.

 

At its meeting on August 13, 2012, the Board of Directors of Cenit Transporte y Logística de Hidrocarburos S.A.S. drafted and approved the Issuance and Placement of Shares Regulation, through which it offered to Ecopetrol S.A. the subscription of 45,582,982 common shares in the Company’s capital, for a total value of $2,279,149, of which $455,830 corresponds to nominal value, and a total of $1,823,319 corresponds to paid-in capital. The above share subscription offer was accepted by Ecopetrol S.A. on August 22, 2012.

 

The companies consolidated by Ecopetrol S.A. are:

 

Subsidiary   Ecopetrol participation
percentages
  Activity   Subsidiaries   Date of
incorporation
  Country/
domicile
  Geographic
area of
operations
    2012   2011   2010                    
Ecopetrol Oleo é Gas do Brasil Ltda.   100   100   100   Hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation   -   14-dec-06   Brazil   Brazil
Ecopetrol del Perú S.A.   100   100   100   Hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation   -   27-aug-07   Peru   Peru
Ecopetrol America Inc.   100   100   100   Hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation   -   09-oct-07   United States   United States
Black Gold Re Ltd.   100   100   100   Reinsurer of Ecopetrol and its subsidiaries   -   24-aug-06   Bermuda   Bermuda
Andean Chemicals Ltd.   100   100   100   Investment vehicle   Bioenergy S.A., Refinería de Cartagena, Propileno del Caribe y Comai   30-jan-97   Bermuda   Bermuda
ODL Finance S.A.   65   65   65   Pipeline transportation of crude oil   ODL S.A.   15-jul-08   Panama   Panama
Propileno del Caribe. Propilco S.A.   100   100   100   Production and marketing of polypropylene resin   Comai Ltd, Refineria de Cartagena.   16-mar-89   Colombia   Colombia
Bioenergy S.A.   91.43   88.6   88.6   Biofuel production   Bioenergy Zona Franca S.A.   13-dec-05   Colombia   Colombia
Ecopetrol Global Energy   100   100   100   Investment vehicle   Ecopetrol America Inc., Ecopetrol Oleo & Gas do Brasil Ltda, Ecopetrol del Perú S.A.,Refinería de Cartagena   26-mar-09   Spain   Spain
Ecopetrol Pipelines International Limited   100   -   -   Investment vehicle   OBC y Ocensa   05-dec-94   Bermuda   Bermuda
Oleoducto Central S.A. – Ocensa   72.65   72.6   60   Pipeline transportation of crude oil   -   14-dec-94   Colombia   Colombia
COMAI – Compounding and Masterbatching Industry   100   100   100   Manufacturing of polypropylene compounds and masterbatches for a wide range of uses   Refinería de Cartagena.   21-may-91   Colombia   Colombia
Refinería de Cartagena S.A.   100   100   100   Hydrocarbon refining, marketing and distribution.   -   11-oct-06   Colombia   Colombia
Hocol Petroleum Limited   100   100   100   Investment vehicle   Hocol S.A.   29-sep-95   Bermuda   Bermuda
Oleoducto de Colombia S.A. – ODC   73   73   66   Pipeline transportation of crude oil   -   10-jul-89   Colombia   Colombia
Oleoducto Bicentenario de Colombia SAS   55.97   55.97   55.97   Pipeline transportation of crude oil   -   18-aug-10   Colombia   Colombia
Ecopetrol Capital AG   100   100   100   Financing, liquidation of funding for companies, groups or any business or related activity   -   07-dec-10   Switzerland   Switzerland
Equión Energía Limited   51   51   -   Hydrocarbon exploration, exploitation and production   Santiago Oil Company, ODC   05-jun-59   United Kingdom   Colombia
Ecopetrol Global Capital SL   100   100   -   Investment vehicle   -   10-jan-11   Spain   Spain
Cenit S.A.S.   100   -   -   Storage and pipeline transportation of hydrocarbons   OBC, Ocensa, ODC, ODL   15-jun-12   Colombia   Colombia

 

F- 10
 

 

The Company and some of its subsidiaries carry out exploration and production operations through Exploration and Production (E&P) Contracts, Technical Evaluation Contracts and Agreements (TEA) signed with the Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos (National Hydrocarbons Agency, hereinafter ANH), as well as through Association Contracts and other types of contracts in various forms. The following is the situation at the close of December 2012:

 

    No. of contracts  
Type of contract   Ecopetrol
S.A.
    Hocol
Petroleum
Ltd.
    Ecopetrol
Oleo é Gas do
Brasil Ltda.
    Ecopetrol
America
Inc.
    Ecopetrol
del Perú
S.A.
    Equión
Energía
Limited
 
Exploration                                                
E&P – ANH Contracts     47       19       -       -       -       2  
E&P – ANH Agreements     6       -       -       -       -       -  
TEAs – ANH     5       1       -       -       -       -  
Association contracts     3       1       13       7       6       -  
Production                                                
Partnership     51       8       -       1       -       4  
E&P – ANH Contracts     -       1       -       -       -       -  
Undeveloped and Inactive Discovered Fields (CDNDI)     16       -       -       -       -       -  
Sole risk     -       -       -       -       -       1  
Incremental production     5       1       -       -       -       -  
Risk participation     3       -       -       -       -       -  
Technological partnership     1       -       -       -       -       -  
Business collaboration     1       -       -       -       -       1  
Services and technical cooperation     1       -       -       -       -       -  
Shared risk participation     1       -       -       -       -       -  
Operation     1       -       -       -       -       -  
Production services with risk     1       -       -       -       -       -  
      142       31       13       8       6       8  

 

The following is a breakdown of production and exploration operations for 2011:

 

    No. of contracts  
Type of contract   Ecopetrol
S.A.
    Hocol
Petroleum
Ltd.
    Ecopetrol
Oleo é Gas
do Brasil
Ltda.
    Ecopetrol
America Inc.
    Ecopetrol
del Perú
S.A.
    Equión
Energía
Limited
 
Exploration                                                
E&P – ANH Contracts     37       15       -       -       6       2  
E&P – ANH Agreements     5       -       -       -       -       -  
TEAs – ANH     3       -       -       -       -       -  
Association contracts     4       1       10       5       5       -  
Production                                                
Partnership     56       9       -       1       -       4  
E&P – ANH Contracts     -       1       -       -       -       -  
Undeveloped and Inactive Discovered Fields (CDNDI)     16       -       -       -       -       -  
Sole risk     -       -       -       -       -       1  
Incremental production     5       1       -       -       -       -  
Risk participation     3       -       -       -       -       -  
Technological partnership     1       -       -       -       -       -  
Business collaboration     1       -       -       -       -       1  
Services and technical cooperation     1       -               -       -       -  
Shared risk participation     1       -       -       -       -       -  
Operation     1       -       -       -       -       -  
Production services with risk     2       -       -       -       -       -  
      136       27       10       6       11       8  

 

Principal accounting policies and practices

 

The Contaduría General de la Nación (CGN – National Accounts Office) adopted the Public Accounting Regime (RCP) in September 2007, defining its configuration, scope and application. Pursuant to CGN Communication No. 20079-101345 of September 28, 2007, the Colombian Government Entity Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) went into effect for Ecopetrol on January 1, 2008.

 

Consolidation process

 

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Articles 23 and 122 of Decree 2649 of 1993. The latter article stipulates that an economic entity that owns more than 50% of the other economic entities must present, along with its basic financial statements, the consolidated financial statements with their respective notes. The consolidation method used is the full consolidation method set out in External Circular Letter No. 005 of April 6, 2000, issued by the Superintendence of Corporations, which stipulates that consolidated financial statements must be aggregated based on the individual financial statements of the parent company and of each of its subsidiaries, identifying the effect of all of the operations among the companies in the group on assets, liabilities, equity and results.

 

F- 11
 

 

The group consolidation was carried out using the financial statements of the parent company and its subsidiaries, at the same cut-off point of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, after they were standardized according to the Public Accounting Regime issued by the Contaduria General de la Nación (CGN) (National Accounting Office).

 

(a) Basis of presentation

 

The consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with Colombian Government Entity GAAP standards and principles issued by the CGN, and other legal provisions. These principles may differ in certain respects from those established by other standards and other control authorities and CGN opinions on specific matters prevail over other regulations.

 

The accrual method was applied for the accounting recognition of the consolidated statement of financial, economic, social and environmental activity.

 

A structure was established in accordance with the rules for the inspection, supervision, and/or control of Ecopetrol and the companies that apply the Regime of Public Accounting (RCP) to record operations at the level of source documents, or for standardization purposes, to define the accounting treatment of operations not covered by the CGN. The structure involves: i) principal and permanent inspection, supervision, and control: Superintendence of Domiciliary Public Services; ii) residual control: Superintendence of Corporations; and iii) concurrent control: Superintendence of Finance, of the activities of the Company in its capacity as issuer in the stock market. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are applied when accounting guidance under Colombian Government Entity GAAP does not address specific accounting issues applicable to the Company, while accounting standards under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (U.S. GAAP) are applied for accounting issues related to crude oil and natural gas activities.

 

The basic consolidated financial statements defined by the CGN are: the Balance Sheet, the Financial, Economic, Social and Environmental Activities Statement, the Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and the Statement of Cash Flows. The notes to the basic consolidated financial statements are an integral part of them.

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the businesses in which the Company holds a direct or indirect share of over 50% of capital, or over which it has significant influence without being a majority shareholder. All inter-company transactions among consolidated companies have been eliminated. The attached consolidated financial statements consolidate the assets, liabilities, equity and results of the subsidiaries.

 

(b) Materiality criterion

 

An economic fact is material when, due to its nature, amount and surrounding circumstances, knowledge or ignorance of it can significantly alter the economic decisions of users of financial information.

 

As set forth by the RCP, the information disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and financial accounting reports must cover the main aspects of the public accounting entity in a way that must be significantly close to the truth, so that it is relevant and reliable for decision-making purposes or the evaluations required to meet accounting information objectives. Materiality depends on the nature of the facts or the magnitude of the amounts revealed or not revealed.

 

The consolidated financial statements include specific headings in accordance with legal requirements or for elements representing 5% or more of total assets, current assets, total liabilities, current liabilities, working capital, equity and income, as appropriate. In addition, lower amounts are shown when they are deemed to contribute to a better interpretation of financial information.

 

(c) Use of estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires that the management of the companies in the Group make estimates and assumptions that could affect the recorded amounts of assets, liabilities, results of activities and the attached notes. These estimates are carried out based on technical criteria, judgment and tenets pursuant to the regulations and legal provisions in effect. Actual results may differ from such estimates.

 

(d) Foreign currency transactions

 

Foreign currency transactions are recognized in accordance with applicable regulations and recorded at the appropriate exchange rates on the transaction date. Balances denominated in foreign currency are reflected in Colombian pesos at the official exchange rates at the end of each year.

 

The exchange difference resulting from asset adjustment is recorded in results, and the difference resulting from liabilities is recorded against the related asset until it is ready for use or sale, at which time the adjustment is recorded in the results.

 

F- 12
 

 

In accordance with Decree 4318 of December 26, 2007 issued by the Ministerio de Comercio, Industria y Turismo (Ministry of Trade, Industry and Tourism), the exchange difference generated by equity investments in foreign subsidiaries is recorded as an increase or decrease in equity value, and when the investment is actually made this value affects the results for the year.

 

While performing their oil industry activities, the Company and its subsidiaries can freely deal in foreign currencies, provided that they comply with the provisions of Colombia’s exchange rate regime.

 

The conversion of financial statements of subsidiaries that use currencies other than the Colombian peso involved changing the currency first to U.S. dollars and then to Colombian pesos. The official exchange rate (ER) for the end of the period was used to convert asset and liability balances, monthly average ERs were used to convert result figures, and historical rates were used to convert capital figures.

 

(e) Joint venture contracts

 

Joint venture contracts are entered into between Ecopetrol or the companies in the Group and third parties in order to share the risk, secure capital, maximize operating efficiency and optimize the recovery of reserves. In these joint ventures, one party is designated as the operator and each party takes its share of the hydrocarbons (crude oil or gas) produced according to its agreed participation. When Ecopetrol or one of the companies in the Group participates as a non-operator partner, it records the assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses based on information reported by the operators. When Ecopetrol or one of the companies in the Group is the direct operator of the joint venture contract, it records 100% of the assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses, recognizing, on a monthly basis, the distribution according to the participation interests of each partner in the line items corresponding to: assets, liabilities, expenses, costs and revenues for the associate.

 

(f) Cash equivalents

 

Cash equivalents are represented by negotiable investments with maturity dates that fall within ninety (90) days of their acquisition, and are recorded as cash management investments.

 

Cash from joint operations in which the Company is the operating partner corresponds to advances from partners (including the companies in the Group) according to their contractually agreed participation percentages, and funds are managed in a joint operation exclusive-use bank account.

 

(g) Derivative financial instruments

 

The Company enters into hedging agreements to hedge against fluctuations in crude-oil prices, product prices and exchange rates. The difference between traded value and market value, generated by hedging operations, is recognized as financial income or expense in the statement of financial, economic, social and environmental activities. The Group does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

 

(h) Investments

 

The investments are classified as: i) liquidity management investments; ii) investments for policy purposes; and iii) equity investments.

 

i. Liquidity management investments correspond to resources invested in debt and participative securities with the objective of obtaining profits through short-term price fluctuations. Their initial recording corresponds to their historical cost and they are updated based on valuation methods issued by the Superintendence of Finance of Colombia.

 

ii. Investments for policy purposes are made up of national or foreign debt securities acquired in compliance with the macroeconomic or internal policies of the Group, which include investments held through their maturity date and those available for sale, which are kept for at least one (1) year, as of the first day on which they were classified for the first time, or when they were reclassified.

 

Investments held to maturity are updated based on the internal rate of return (IRR) as set out in the methodology adopted by the Superintendence of Finance; the investments for the purpose of macroeconomic policy and those available for sale must be updated based on the methodology adopted by the Superintendence of Finance for tradable investments.

 

iii. Equity investments are classified as being in controlled and uncontrolled entities. Equity investments in controlled entities are recognized at their acquisition cost whenever it is lower than the intrinsic value; otherwise, they are recognized at the intrinsic value, and the difference between the purchase price and the intrinsic value corresponds to goodwill. Their values are updated using the equity method, as established in CGN Resolution 145 of 2008.

 

Investments in associates in which the Company exerts significant influence are recorded using the equity method.

 

Significant influence is defined as the power the entity has, whether or not the percentage of ownership is 50% or lower, to participate in setting and directing the financial and operational policies of another entity for the purpose of obtaining profits from that entity.

 

F- 13
 

 

Significant influence may be present in one or more of the following ways:

 

Representation on the Board of Directors or equivalent governing body of the associate;

 

Participation in policy-making;

 

Significant transactions between the investor and the associate;

 

Secondment of officers; or

 

Supplying essential technical information.

 

For subsidiaries abroad, the equity method must apply in Colombian legal currency after the conversion of financial statements in foreign currency.

 

Equity investments in uncontrolled entities include shares with a low or minimum market, or shares not listed on an exchange. They do not enable any type of control or significant influence and are recognized at historical cost. Their change in value arises from periodically comparing the cost of the investment to its intrinsic value or its value on the stock market.

 

Investments made in foreign currency are recognized by applying the ER on the date of the transaction. The value must be re-expressed periodically based on the ER, whenever the adjustment method does not take it into account.

 

(i) Accounts and notes receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts

 

Accounts and notes receivable are stated at their original amount or at the value accepted by the debtor, subject to periodic updating according to legal provisions in effect, or according to agreed upon contract terms.

 

The allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed and updated periodically based on the age of the balances and the recovery analysis of individual accounts. The Group carries out the necessary administrative and legal steps to recover overdue accounts receivable and to collect interest from clients who do not comply with payment policies.

 

Accounts and notes receivable are only written off against the allowances when there is reasonable legal or material certainty of the total or partial loss of the incorporated or represented right.

 

(j) Inventories

 

The inventories include assets extracted, in production process, transformed and acquired for any reason, to be sold, intended for transformation and consumed in the production process, or as part of services delivered. The perpetual inventory system is used.

 

Inventories are stated at historical cost or at purchase cost, including direct and indirect charges incurred to prepare the inventory for sale or production.

 

The value of inventories is measured using the weighted average method, taking into account the following parameters:

 

Inventories of crude oil and own production, taking into account production cost;

 

Crude oil purchases, at acquisition costs, including transportation and delivery costs incurred;

 

Inventory of finished products, at total production costs;

 

Work in progress inventory, at production costs; and

 

Raw materials inventory, at weighted average cost.

 

Raw materials and supplies in joint ventures are controlled by the operator and reported in a joint account at the acquisition cost (recorded in the original currency at average costs). Inventory consumption is charged to the joint venture as a cost, expense or investment, as appropriate.

 

Furthermore, inventories are valued at market cost or average cost, whichever is lower, and in-transit inventories are valued at actual cost incurred. At the end of the fiscal year allowances are calculated to take into account impairment, obsolescence, excess, slow movement or loss of market value.

 

F- 14
 

 

(k) Property, plant and equipment depreciation

 

Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost adjusted for inflation up to 2001. This cost includes financial expenses and the exchange differences for acquisition in foreign currency up until commissioning of the asset, as well as financial revenues from the unused portion of financial obligations acquired to finance investment projects. When an asset is sold or retired, the adjusted cost and accumulated depreciation are written off and any gain or loss is recorded in the year’s results.

 

Depreciation is calculated on the total acquisition cost using the straight-line method, based on the assets’ useful life, which are reviewed periodically. Annual depreciation rates are:

 

    %  
Buildings and pipelines     5  
Plant and equipment     10  
Transportation equipment     20  
Computers     33.3  

 

Disbursements for maintenance and repairs are recorded as expenses. Significant disbursements that improve efficiency of an asset or extend its useful life are capitalized as an increase in the value of that asset.

 

The value of property, plant and equipment is subject to periodic revaluation by comparing the net book value with the value determined through technical appraisals. When the value of an asset’s technical appraisal is greater than its net book cost, the difference is recorded as an asset valuation and credited to the surplus account for equity valuation; otherwise, it is recorded as an allowance for devaluations and charged to results.

 

Upon termination of an association contract, the Group receives, at no cost, the property, plant and equipment, materials and amortizable oil investments belonging to the associate. This transaction does not affect the Group’s results.

 

(l) Natural and environmental resources

 

The Group follows the successful-efforts method of accounting for investments in exploration and production or development. Expenses for geological and geophysical studies are recorded as they are incurred. Acquisition and exploration costs are capitalized until it is determined whether the exploration drilling was successful or not. If it is not successful, all of the costs incurred are charged to expenses. When a project is approved for development, the accumulated value of the acquisition and exploration costs are classified in the oil investment account. Costs capitalized also include asset retirement costs. Asset and liability balances related to asset retirement costs are updated every six months. Production and support equipment is accounted under the historical cost and is included in property, plant and equipment subject to depreciation.

 

Natural and environmental resources investments are amortized by applying the amortization factor to technical units of production and proven developed reserves per field, royalty-free, estimated as of December 31 of the immediately preceding year. The amortization charged to results is adjusted at the end of December, recalculating the DD&A (Depletion, Depreciation and Amortization) as of January 1 of the current year, based on the reserve study updated at the end of the current year.

 

In the same way that it receives property, plant and equipment upon termination of an association contract, Ecopetrol receives, at no cost, the associate’s amortizable oil investments.

 

Ecopetrol has established a corporate process for reserves led by the Reserves Directorate, which reports directly to the Vice President of Corporate Finance. The reserves are audited by internationally recognized external consultants and approved by the Company’s Reserves Committee. Proven reserves consist of the estimated quantities of crude oil and natural gas demonstrated with reasonable certainty by geological and engineering data to be recoverable in future years from known reserves under existing economic and operating conditions, that is, at the prices and costs that apply at the date of the estimate.

 

Since Ecopetrol became an issuer on the Bolsa de Valores de Colombia (BVC – Colombia Stock Exchange) and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), the Group has applied the methodology approved by the SEC (Securities Exchange Commission) for estimating reserves. Under this methodology, the reference price is the arithmetic average of the BRENT price for crude over the previous twelve (12) months.

 

Estimating hydrocarbon reserves is fraught with the various uncertainties inherent to determining proven reserves, recovery and production rates, the timeliness of investments to develop deposits and the maturity of fields.

 

We capitalize of exploratory well costs when the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well and the Company is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. Exploratory well costs not meeting these criteria are charged as expense.

 

(m) Deferred charges

 

Deferred charges include: i) deferred income tax resulting from the temporary differences between the basis for determining commercial gains and taxable net income at the end of each period; ii) the net equity tax, which is amortized up to 2014; and iii) investments made to develop cooperation contracts that are amortized based on technical units of production.

 

F- 15
 

 

(n) Other assets

 

Other assets include goodwill, which corresponds to the difference between the purchase value of equity investments in controlled or joint-control entities, and their intrinsic value, which reflects the economic benefits expected to be achieved from the investment, created by good name, specialized personnel, preferential credit reputation, prestige due to sale of better products and services, favourable location and the expectations of new businesses, among other things.

 

Goodwill is amortized using methods of recognized technical value over the term for expected recovery of the investment, which is 10 to 18 years. At the close of each accounting period, the Group must evaluate goodwill to determine whether the conditions for the generation of future economic benefits still exist; otherwise, the asset must be retired. If the book value of the equity investment plus the book value of goodwill, which includes its historical cost added to all price adjustments and amortizations, is greater than the market value, the asset shall, as a result of such difference, be retired in the related year, with charge to results, and the reasons for said decision shall be disclosed.

 

Intangible assets like software, licenses and patents are recognized at acquisition, development or production cost. Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the periods during which the benefits arising from the incurred costs and expenses are expected to occur, or during the term of the legal or contractual coverage of the granted rights.

 

(o) Valuations

 

a. Investments

 

Valuations correspond to the differences between the net book value of the investments and their intrinsic value or quoted price on the stock exchange.

 

b. Property, plant and equipment

 

Valuations and the valuation surplus of property, plant and equipment correspond to the difference between the net book cost and the market value for real estate or the current use value (CUV) for plant and equipment, determined by specialists registered with the Colombian Real Estate Association or by suitable technical personnel, as appropriate.

 

The methodology used for plant and equipment appraisal is the current use value (CUV) for running businesses, for the economic valuation of assets, taking into account facilities’ current conditions and their useful life in terms of production capability and ability to generate income. It is not mandatory to adjust the value of moveable property when its historical value, taken individually, is lower than 35 current monthly legal minimum wages, or of property, plant and equipment located in high risk zones.

 

(p) Financial obligations

 

Public credit operations pertain to any actions undertaken or contracts entered into, in compliance with legal regulations governing public credit, to supply the Company with resources, goods and services under specific payment terms such as loans, issue and placement of bonds and public credit securities, and suppliers’ credit.

 

With respect to loans, public credit operations must be recorded for the actual disbursed amount, while bonds and securities placed are recorded at their nominal value. Placement costs are carried directly to expenses.

 

(q) Income tax

 

Current tax expenses are calculated based on taxable income.

 

The effect of temporary differences leading to the payment of a lower or higher income tax in the current year is recorded as a deferred tax asset or liability, as appropriate, provided that there is a reasonable expectation that such differences will be reversed.

 

(r) Labor and pension obligations

 

The main plan covers salary and benefits for Ecopetrol S.A. staff, and is governed by the Collective Labor Agreement 01 of 1977, and by the Substantive Labor Code. In addition to legally mandated benefits, employees are entitled to agreed upon additional benefits linked to place of work, type of work, length of service, and basic salary. Annual interest of 12% is recognized on accumulated severance amounts for each employee, and the payment of indemnities is provided for when special circumstances arise that result in the non-voluntary termination of the contract, without just cause, and in periods other than the probationary period.

  

The actuarial calculation includes active employees, employees with indefinite term contracts, pensioners and heirs, for pension, health care and education plans; it also includes pension bonds for temporary employees, active employees and voluntary retirements. Health and education obligations are not part of pension liabilities, they are part of benefit obligations.

 

F- 16
 

 

All social benefits of employees who joined the Company before 1990 are the responsibility of Ecopetrol, without the involvement of any social security entity or institution. The cost of health services for the employee and his/her relatives registered with the Company is determined by means of the morbidity table, based on facts occurring during 2011.

 

Similarly, Ecopetrol calculates educational allowances according to experience, based on the annual average cost of each business, subdivided in accordance with the type of studies: pre-school, elementary, high school and university.

 

For employees who joined the Company subsequent to the entry into effect of Law 50 of 1990, the Company makes periodic contributions for severance, pensions and occupational injuries to the funds created for these respective obligations. Similarly, Law 797 of January 29, 2003 determined that Ecopetrol employees who joined the Company as of that date would be subject to the provisions of the General Pension Regime.

 

Pursuant to Legislative Act 01 of 2005, enacted by the Colombian Congress, the pension plans excluded from the General Social Security System in Colombia expired on July 31, 2010. In accordance with the provisions therein, the Ministry of Social Protection’s judicial pronouncement on the matter and the analysis conducted by Ecopetrol’s labor advisers, it was concluded that those workers who had met the age and continuous or discontinuous service time requirements of the law, the Collective Bargaining Agreement in effect and/or Agreement 01 of 1977, prior to August 1, 2010, had consolidated their right to their pension. It was, however, mandatory for other workers, who were not covered, to join the General Pension System. The pension administrator chosen by the worker (Colpensiones, Private Pension Fund, or whichever applies) would be responsible for recognizing and paying the respective pension.

 

As set out in Decree 941 of 2002, upon approval of the actuarial calculation by the Ministry of Finance in October 2008, and upon approval of the mechanism by the Ministry of Social Protection through the Administration Act of December 29, 2008, the Company partially switched over the value corresponding to monthly pension payments from its pension liabilities, transferring said liabilities and their underlying amounts to stand-alone pension equities (PAP). The funds transferred and returns on those funds cannot be redirected nor be returned to the Company until all of the pension obligations have been fulfilled.

 

The transferred liability corresponds only to pension allowances and pension bonds. The portion relating to health care and education services remains within Ecopetrol’s labor liabilities.

 

At the end of each period, Ecopetrol must check the reported value of trust funds against the updated pension liability value as determined by the latest actuarial calculation. In the event that equity is insufficient to cover 100% of the liability, the Company must create an allowance for the difference, which must be funded should the contingency materialize. Ecopetrol remains materially responsible for the payment of pension liabilities.

 

Through Resolution 1555 of July 30, 2010, the Superintendence of Finance replaced the mortality tables used to prepare actuarial calculations and stipulated that the effects of the change could be recognized gradually. Subsequently, Decree 4565 of December 7, 2010 modified the accounting standards for amortization of the actuarial calculation in effect up to that date. Pursuant to the new decree, the companies that had amortized 100% of their actuarial calculation at December 31, 2009 could gradually amortize the increase in the actuarial calculation for 2010 using the new mortality tables, up to 2029.

 

Given the above, in 2010 Ecopetrol modified its accounting policy for amortization of the actuarial calculation of monthly pension payments, pension quotas and bonds (transferred liabilities) and health bonds, and adopted a five-year term starting in 2010 to amortize the increase in the 2010 actuarial calculation. Up until 2009, the yearly increase in the actuarial calculation was recorded as expenses for the period, as the actuarial calculation was 100% amortized.

 

Resolution 717 of December 2012 amended the Manual de Procedimiento del Régimen de Contabilidad Pública (Regime of Public Accounting Procedure Manual) with regard to the Accounting Procedure for recognizing and disclosing pension liability, the underlying financial reserve, and related expenses, at items 5 and 44. With regard to item 5, the indications in the previous paragraph lead to the conclusion that this item has no impact on the Company’s activities within its amortization plan.

 

With regard to item 44, its only impact is to disclose the fact that the Reserve Funds are common funds that are also under the administration of Colpensiones. There are no further implications for Ecopetrol.

 

(s) Advances received from Ecogas to cover BOMT (Build, Operate, Maintain and Transfer) obligations

 

Pursuant to the sale of Ecogas by the Colombian Nation, and following specific instructions from CGN, the net present value of the future payment scheme in connection with Ecopetrol’s debt toward BOMT contractors was recognized as deferred income. These liabilities are due in 2017, the year when the contract obligations will be fulfilled.

 

(t) Hydrocarbon purchases

 

Ecopetrol purchases hydrocarbons that the ANH receives from all production in Colombia, at prices established according to section four of Law 756 of 2002 and Resolution 18-1709 of 2003 of the Ministry of Mines and Energy, taking into account international reference prices.

 

F- 17
 

 

Hydrocarbons are also purchased from partners and other producers in Colombia and abroad to meet the Group’s needs and operating plans.

 

(u) Revenue recognition

 

Revenue from crude oil and natural gas sales is recognized at the time of transfer of title to the buyer, including risks and benefits. In the case of refined and petrochemical products, revenue is recognized when products are shipped by the refinery and subsequently adjusted in accordance with the volumes actually delivered.

 

Revenue from transportation services is recognized when products are transported and delivered to the buyer in accordance with sale terms. In other cases, revenue is recognized at the time it is earned and a true, probable and quantifiable right to demand its payment arises.

 

Under current regulations, Ecopetrol S.A. and Sociedad Refinería de Cartagena S.A. (Reficar) sell regular gasoline and diesel at a regulated price, and the National Government recognizes for these businesses the amount of the subsidy on regular gasoline and diesel granted to local consumers, which is generated by adding the difference, for every day of the month, between the producer’s regulated revenues and the daily price equivalent to the U.S. Gulf Coast reference price, calculated according to origin and multiplied by the volumes sold daily.

 

Resolution 182439 and Decree 4839 of December 2008 establish the procedure for recognizing subsidies in the event they are negative (negative value between parity and regulated prices).

 

In March 2010, the Ministry of Mines and Energy issued Resolution No. 180522, which revoked provisions that were contrary to Resolutions 181496 of September 2008, 182439 of December 30, 2008, and 180219 of February 13, 2009 and modified the formula for calculating the international reference prices for gasoline and diesel.

 

In 2012, Resolution 91658 was issued, amending Resolution 180522 with regard to the subsidy procedure for refiners and importers of regular gasoline and diesel.

 

(v) Cost of sales and expenses

 

Costs are recognized at their historic value both for goods purchased for sale and for the accumulated production costs of goods produced and services rendered. Costs are disclosed according to the operation generating them.

 

Expenses correspond to the amounts required for the development of ordinary activities and include those related with activities caused by extraordinary events. Expenses are disclosed in accordance with their nature and the occurrence of extraordinary events.

 

Costs and expenses are recognized upon receipt of goods or services or when there is certainty that the economic event will occur. Fuel shortages and losses due to theft and explosions are recorded as non-operating expenses.

 

(w) Abandonment of fields

 

The Group recognizes estimated liability for future environmental obligations, and its corresponding entry is a higher value for natural resource and environmental assets. The estimate includes the cost of plugging and abandoning wells, dismantling facilities and the environmental recovery of areas and wells. Amortization is recorded as production costs, using the technical-units-of-production method, based on remaining proved developed reserves. Changes resulting from new estimates of liability for abandonment and environmental restoration are accounted for under the corresponding asset.

 

Depending on the scope of certain association contracts, field abandonment costs are taken on by partners according to the same participation percentages set out in each contract. Ecopetrol has not allocated funds to cover these obligations, with the exception of the Casanare, Orocue, Garcero, Estero, Corocora, Monas, Guajira, Tisquirama, Cravo Norte association contracts and the Caño Limón Coveñas pipeline. However, as activities linked to field abandonment take place, they will be covered by the Group.

 

(x) Accounting for contingencies

 

On the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements, conditions might exist that could result in losses for the Company that will only be known if specific future circumstances arise. The nature, probability of such situations, as well as the amounts involved are evaluated by Management, the Vice President of Legal Affairs, and legal consultants, so that decisions can be made regarding changes to amounts provisioned and/or disclosed. This analysis includes current legal suits against the Companies of the Group.

 

The methodology used to assess legal proceedings and any contingent obligations is based on the Nation’s credit system used by the Ministry of the Interior and Justice.

 

F- 18
 

 

A provision is recorded for legal proceedings when there is a conviction at trial court or when the risk assessment outcome is “likely to lose.”

 

(y) Memorandum accounts

 

Creditor and debtor memorandum accounts represent the estimated value of facts or circumstances that could affect the Group’s financial, economic, social and environmental situation. They also disclose the value of the goods, rights and obligations that require control, and also include differences between accounting information and the information used for tax purposes.

 

(z) Net earnings per share

 

Net earnings per share are calculated based on net earnings for the year, divided by the weighted average of subscribed shares in circulation.

 

The Company does not have share-based employee incentive plans.

 

(aa) Transition from Colombian Government Entity GAAP (RCP) to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)

 

In accordance with Law 1314 of 2009 and Regulatory Decrees 1706 and 2784 of 2012, the Group must begin the transition toward convergence of the accounting and financial information standards applied in Colombia with IFRS. For this purpose, the Consejo Técnico de la Contaduría Pública (Public Accounting Technical Council) has placed companies in groups; the Company belongs to Group 1, with a transition period beginning in January 1, 2014, and with the first consolidated financial statements under International Financial Reporting Standards to be issued in 2015.

 

(2) Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency

 

Transactions and balances in foreign currency are converted at the representative market exchange rate certified by the Superintendence of Finance of Colombia.

 

As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, the consolidated financial statements of Ecopetrol included the following assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency (converted to Colombian pesos at the closing exchange rates of $1,768.23 and $1,942.70 per US$1, respectively).

 

    December 31, 2012     December 31, 2011  
    Thousands of
US dollars
    Equivalent
millions of pesos
    Thousands of
US dollars
    Equivalent
millions of pesos
 
Assets                                
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 978,367     $ 1,729,977     $ 1,387,341     $ 2,695,187  
Investments     2,546,927       4,503,553       3,142,338       6,104,620  
Accounts and notes receivable     1,861,230       3,291,083       2,722,535       5,289,069  
Advances and deposits     92,210       163,048       58,644       113,928  
Other assets     11,662       20,622       4,024       7,817  
    $ 5,490,396     $ 9,708,283     $ 7,314,882     $ 14,210,621  

 

    December 31, 2012     December 31, 2011  
    Thousands of
US dollars
    Equivalent
millions of pesos
    Thousands of
US dollars
      Equivalent
millions of pesos
 
Liabilities                                
Financial obligations   $ 4,398,712     $ 7,777,934       1,700,334     $ 3,303,239  
Estimated liabilities and provision     94,677       167,411       248,652       483,056  
Accounts payable and affiliates     1,992,017       3,522,345       1,135,850       2,206,616  
Other liabilities     282,606       499,712       663,960       1,289,875  
    $ 6,768,012     $ 11,967,402     $ 3,748,796     $ 7,282,786  
Net asset (liabilities) position   $ (1,277,616 )   $ (2,259,119 )   $ 3,566,086     $ 6,927,835  

 

F- 19
 

 

(3) Cash and cash equivalents

 

The following is a breakdown of cash and cash equivalents:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Banks and corporations (1)   $ 6,119,406     $ 5,452,929  
Special funds (2)     1,549,016       1,043,726  
Cash     757       3,699  
Investments on demand (3)     271,511       279,583  
    $ 7,940,690     $ 6,779,937  

 

(1) Corresponds to advances made by partners to Ecopetrol S.A. for the exclusive use of the joint venture, in the amount of $75,207 (2011, $52,533) and the Group’s own resources in the amount of $6,044,199 (2011, $5,400,396).

 

(2) Corresponds mainly to savings in special funds in pesos in the amount of $556,756 (2011, $2,073) and in foreign currency of $708,007 (2011, $942,962) as well as investments in overnight operations in the amount of $4,942 (2011, $80,109).

 

(3) As at December 31, 2012, represented by investments on demand, mainly fixed-term deposit certificates and overnight operations, comprised mainly of the following: $108,374 from Ocensa S.A., $12,838 from Reficar, $40,768 from Hocol, $74,345 from Ecopetrol Óleo e Gas do Brasil and $12,504 from Equión and as at December 31, 2011 mainly represented by time deposits TDs (CDT) and overnight operations, between which the most representative are: $99,435 of Ocensa S.A, $83,482 of Reficar, $56,358 of Hocol, $14,838 of Ecopetrol Óleo E Gas Do Brasil and $11,934 of Equión.

 

(4) Investments:

 

The following is a breakdown of investments:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Current:                
Fixed yield                
Term deposits   $ 156,287     $ -  
Bonds and securities of private or foreign entities     654,635       512,378  
Bonds issued by the Colombian Government     17,219       398,959  
Investment funds administered by third parties     -       149,021  
Specific purpose fund – legal contingencies (1)     30,300       86,026  
Treasury securities – TES     508,575       191,204  
Hedging financial instruments     4,543       14  
Total current   $ 1,371,559     $ 1,337,602  
                 
Long term:                
Variable yield – Shares (2)   $ 1,077,190     $ 1,020,059  
Fixed yield                
Bonds and securities of foreign entities     2,071,957       3,303,859  
Bonds issued by the Colombian Government     1,008,433       869,710  
Treasury securities – TES     1,236,166       -  
Specific purpose fund – legal contingencies (1)     393,916       273,805  
Other investments     24,561       7,372  
Total long term   $ 5,812,223     $ 5,474,805  

 

(1) Corresponds to restricted resources made up of fixed-yield investments entered into based on the court rulings linked to the Derecho Comuneros – Santiago de las Atalayas and Pueblo Viejo de Cusiana proceedings, with regard to the attachment and seizure of royalty payments that Ecopetrol was to have paid pursuant to Royalty Contracts No. 15, 15A, 16 and 16A, declared null by statute in the State Council ruling of September 13, 1999.

 

(2) Variable yield – Shares:

 

F- 20
 

 

The following is a breakdown of the variable yield investments represented in shares at December 31, 2012 and 2011.

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Companies:                
Significant Influence   $ 840,692     $ 783,566  
Non-strategic     236,498       236,493  
 Total   $ 1,077,190     $ 1,020,059  

 

The following is a breakdown of long-term, variable yield investments as at December 31, 2012, recognized using the equity method:

 

Equity share   Number of shares
and/or quotas
    Participation
percentage
    Valuation
date
  Historical
cost
    Book value     Equity method
effect
 
Significant influence:                                            
Ecodiesel Colombia S.A.     10,500,000,000       50     December   $ 10,500     $ 19,408     $ 8,908  
Serviport S.A.     58,800,000       49     December     2,081       7,193       5,112  
Offshore International Group     250       50     December     408,517       532,269       123,752  
Invercolsa S.A.     1,213,801,146       43.35     October     61,671       240,555       178,884  
Transgas     27,372,771       20     November     4,051       41,267       37,216  
Total                       $ 486,820     $ 840,692     $ 353,872  

 

The following is a breakdown of long-term, variable yield investments as at December 31, 2011, recognized using the equity method:

 

Equity share   Number of shares
and/or quotas
    Participation
percentage
    Valuation
date
  Historical
cost
    Book value     Equity
method effect
 
Significant influence:                                            
Serviport S.A.     53,714,116       49     November   $ 2,081     $ 5,129     $ 3,048  
Ecodiesel Colombia S.A.     10,500,000,000       50     December     10,500       10,681       181  
Offshore International Group     250       50     December     408,517       493,171       84,653  
Invercolsa S.A.     1,213,801,146       43.35     November     61,672       232,757       171,085  
Transgas     27,372,771       20     November     4,051       41,828       37,778  
Total                       $ 486,821     $ 783,566     $ 296,745  

 

The following is a breakdown of long-term, variable yield investments as at December 31, 2012, recognized using the cost method:

 

Equity share   Number of shares
and/or quotas
    Participation
percentage
    Valuation
date
  Cost     Market/
Intrinsic value
    Appreciation
/
Depreciation
 
STRATEGIC                                            
Zona Franca de Cartagena S.A.     290       10     November   $ 394     $ 1,163     $ 769  
Sociedad Portuaria del Dique     200       1     November     5       20       15  
Sociedad Portuaria Olefinas     249,992       50     November     250       439       189  
Los Arces Group     10,001       100     December     5,100       5,100       -  
Amandine Holding     500       100     December     6,657       6,657       -  
                        $ 12,406     $ 13,379     $ 973  
                                             
NON STRATEGIC                                            
Empresa de Energía de Bogotá     631,098,000       6.87     December   $ 154,375     $ 801,494     $ 647,119  
Interconexión Eléctrica S.A.     58,925,480       5.32     December     69,549       565,683       496,134  
Concentra Inteligencia en Energía S.A.S.     168,000       9.52     November     168       159       (9 )
                        $ 224,092     $ 1,367,336     $ 1,143,244  
                        $ 236,498     $ 1,380,715     $ 1,144,217  
F- 21
 

 

The following is a breakdown of long-term, variable yield investments as at December 31, 2011, recognized using the cost method:

 

Equity share   Number of shares
and/or quotas
    Participation
percentage
    Valuation
date
  Cost     Market/Intrinsic
value
    Appreciation/
Depreciation
 
STRATEGIC                                            
Zona Franca de Cartagena S.A.     290       10     November   $ 392     $ 1,755     $ 1,363  
Sociedad Portuaria del Dique     200       1     November     5       17       12  
Sociedad Portuaria Olefinas     249,992       50     November     329       386       57  
Los Arces Group     10,001       100     March     5,100       5,100       -  
Amandine Holding     500       100     March     6,657       6,657       -  
                        $ 12,483     $ 13,915     $ 1,432  
                                             
NON STRATEGIC                                            
Empresa de Energía de Bogotá     631,098,000       6.87     December   $ 154,376     $ 741,540     $ 587,164  
Interconexión Eléctrica S.A.     58,925,480       5.32     December     69,549       659,966       590,417  
Concentra Inteligencia en Energía S.A.S.     84,000       5     October     85       92       7  
  Total non-strategic                       $ 224,010     $ 1,401,598     $ 1,777,588  
                        $ 236,493     $ 1,415,513     $ 1,179,020  

 

Restrictions on long-term investments – variable income:

 

The following developments can be reported for the Invercolsa S.A. trial as at January 10, 2013: The Supreme Court of Justice is deciding over the cassation appeals put forth by AFIB S.A. and Fernando Londoño Hoyos against the sentence issued by the 28 th Civil Circuit Court on February 8, 2007, (sentence that was confirmed by the Superior Court of the Judicial District of Bogota – Civil Chamber, on January 11, 2011). On October 22, 2012, the notification for the appellant AFIB S.A. to support the corresponding recourse came due, and was submitted in a timely manner, and the notification period began so that appellant Fernando Londoño Hoyos could support his recourse, which was also done within the prescribed period. Therefore, on December 5, 2012, the Court Registrar indicated that, upon notification to the appellants, the corresponding claims were made on time and are part of the record, the report of which was dispatched on the same day.

 

It should be noted that the appeal sentence of January 11, 2011 ordered: i) that the purchase of 145 million shares of Invercolsa by Fernando Londoño Hoyos be cancelled; ii) that the cancellation of said transaction be recorded in the shareholders’ book, including the pledge in favor of the Pacífico Colombia y Panamá banks, as well as the payment in kind of the Arrendadora Financiera Internacional Bolivariana S.A. shares; iii) that Fernando Londoño Hoyos and AFIB return the Invercolsa dividends to Ecopetrol, along with the new shares received as profit and/or revaluations; iv) that Fernando Londoño Hoyos did not acquire or possess in good faith the 145 million Invercolsa shares; and v) that Invercolsa adjust its operation and the Assembly to the declarations made in the sentence. If ruled in favor of Ecopetrol, the Company would be the owner of the aforementioned number of shares of Invercolsa and the normal rights that come with it: voice, vote and dividends.

 

The economic activity for the entities in which the Group has investments are as follows:

 

Company   Economic Activity
     
Invercolsa S.A.   Investments in companies in the energy sector, including activities specific to the hydrocarbon and mining industry and trade
Serviport S.A.   Support services for loading and unloading oil tankers, supplying equipment for the same purpose, technical inspections and load measurements
Ecodiesel Colombia S.A.   Production, marketing and distribution of biofuels and oleo chemicals
Offshore International Group   Hydrocarbon exploration, development, production and processing

 

Maturity of fixed-yield investments

 

The following is a summary showing the maturity of long term fixed-yield investments as at December 31, 2012:

 

Maturity   1 – 3 years     3 – 5 years     > 5 years     Total  
Foreign bonds and other securities   $ 1,845,673     $ 226,284     $ -     $ 2,071,957  
Government bonds and other securities     628,816       304,048       75,569       1,008,433  
Fixed-term securities – TES     772,747       148,949       314,470       1,236,166  
Specific purpose fund     58,328       63,339       272,249       393,916  
Other*     24,561       -       -       24,561  
    $ 3,330,125     $ 742,620     $ 662,288     $ 4,735,033  

 

F- 22
 

 

Ecopetrol Oleo e Gas do Brasil has financial investments in Citibank in the amount of $24,492, given as a guarantee to the ANP (the equivalent of the ANH) until it approves ECP Brazil’s participation in the Vanco-BM-S-63, 71 and 72 drilling blocks. Following said approval, this amount will be transferred to the purchase of participation, and in the event that it is not approved, the amount will be returned.

 

The following is a summary showing the maturity of long term fixed-yield investments as at December 31, 2011:

 

Maturity   1 – 3 years     3 – 5 years     > 5 years     Total  
Foreign bonds and other securities   $ 3,218,402     $ 85,457     $ -     $ 3,303,859  
Government bonds and other securities     768,385       -       101,325       869,710  
Specific purpose fund     139,427       15,827       118,551       273,805  
Other investments     7,372       -       -       7,372  
    $ 4,133,586     $ 101,284     $ 219,876     $ 4,454,746  

 

(5) Accounts and notes receivable

 

The following is a breakdown of accounts and notes receivable:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Current portion                
Customers                
National   $ 975,306     $ 964,697  
Foreign     2,402,406       2,578,421  
Price differential to be received from the Ministry of Mines and Energy (1)     1,381,515       571,742  
Various debtors     462,757       434,014  
Reimbursements and yields on investment     53       2,968  
Association contracts – joint ventures     13,002       12,234  
Accounts receivable from employees     19,748       61,005  
Doubtful debts     199,216       131,750  
Industrial service clients     8,517       19,005  
Notes receivable     34,533       (627 )
Total   $ 5,497,053     $ 4,775,209  
                 
Less – Allowance for doubtful accounts     (235,552 )     (138,673 )
Total current   $ 5,261,501     $ 4,636,536  
Long term portion                
National     20,830       1,183  
Foreign     2,300       3,143  
Cavipetrol and loans to employees (2)     359,451       282,947  
Price differential to be received from the Ministry of Mines and Energy (1)     77,510       77,510  
Credit portfolio     8,520       5,836  
Other     34,840       36,608  
Total long term   $ 503,451     $ 407,227  

 

Determination and classification of the client portfolio as at December 31, 2012, according to maturity:

 

    Days to maturity  
    0 – 180     181 – 360     Over 361*  
Current portfolio   $ 3,217,740     $ 20,366     $ 1,951  
Default portfolio     123,848       7,358       29,579  
    $ 3,341,588     $ 27,724     $ 31,530  
                         
National clients   $ 968,375       26,648       1,113  
Foreign clients     2,373,213       1,076       30,417  
    $ 3,341,588     $ 27,724     $ 31,530  

 

F- 23
 

 

Determination and classification of the client portfolio as at December 31, 2011, according to maturity:

 

    Days to maturity  
    0 – 180     181 – 360     Over 361*  
Current portfolio   $ 3,210,484     $ 1,051     $ -  
Default portfolio     225,900       105,683       4,326  
    $ 3,436,384     $ 106,734     $ 4,326  
                         
National clients   $ 963,646       1,051       1,183  
Foreign clients     2,472,738       105,683       3,143  
    $ 3,436,384     $ 106,734     $ 4,326  

 

* Client portfolio included in doubtful debts.

 

The following shows the movement in the allowance for accounts receivable:

 

    December 31,
 2012
    December 31,
 2011
 
Opening balance:   $ 138,673     $ 101,400  
Additions (new allowances)     88,441       32,422  
Recovery of allowances     (5,945 )     (365 )
Accounts receivable write-off     (78 )     (770 )
Use of allowances     14,461       5,986  
Balance   $ 235,552     $ 138,673  

 

(1) Account receivable from the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit, arising from the calculation of the regular motor gasoline and diesel price differential pursuant to Resolution 180522 issued on March 29, 2010.

 

(2) By means of Leg contracts 058-80 of 1980 and 4008928 of 2006, the administration, management and control of loans granted to employees by the Company were transferred to Cavipetrol. In its capacity as administrator, Cavipetrol monitors, in its database and financial system, the details per employee of said loans and their respective conditions.

 

Future collection of accounts receivable from Cavipetrol as at December 31, 2012 are estimated as follows:

 

Year   Value  
       
2013   $ 31,613  
2014     31,613  
2015 and beyond     276,239  
    $ 339,465  

 

Similarly, at December 31, 2012 loans were made to the employees of Equión in the amount of $11,984, of Hocol in the amount of $7,525, of Propilco in the amount of $412, of Comai in the amount of $65.

 

There are no major restrictions for the recovery of accounts and notes receivable.

 

F- 24
 

 

(6) Inventories

 

The following is a breakdown of the inventories:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Finished products:                
Crude oil   $ 941,846     $ 1,094,691  
Fuels     801,403       701,665  
Petrochemicals     66,107       85,411  
Natural gas (1)     29,415       -  
Purchased products:                
Fuels     13,613       43,527  
Crude oil     260,429       116,398  
Petrochemicals     11,995       24,042  
Natural gas (1)     -       392  
Agricultural products     1,149          
Raw materials:                
Crude oil     127,272       187,048  
Petrochemicals     30,485       32,087  
Products in process:                
Fuels     435,952       396,270  
Petrochemicals     7,627       12,523  
Packaging material     1,579       5,139  
Materials for the production of goods     82,082       65,706  
Materials in transit     22,478       24,359  
Total   $ 2,833,432     $ 2,789,258  
Less – Reserve for inventories     (27,150 )     (27,653 )
Total   $ 2,806,282     $ 2,761,605  

 

The movement in the allowance for inventories is as follows:

 

    December 31, 2012     December 31, 2011  
Opening balance   $ 27,653     $ 19,297  
Allowance increase (decrease)     (503 )     8,356  
Closing balance   $ 27,150     $ 27,653  

 

(1) Natural gas imbalance – The Group uses the entitlement method of accounting for gas balancing agreements, through which the amount of natural gas sold is based on the shared ownership interest. The Group had a gas imbalance as at December 31, 2012 of $5,713 (US$3,241,756) in its favor, equivalent to 574,109 MBTU. The Group did not have an imbalance as at December 31, 2011. In accordance with Colombian Government Entity GAAP, natural gas imbalances are resolved through sales or purchases to or from the partner, accounted for at the end of the period.

 

F- 25
 

 

(7) Advances and deposits

 

The following is a breakdown of advances and deposits:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Current:                
Official entities (1)   $ 4,752,125     $ 2,851,195  
Advances to investment projects     -       1,749  
Partners in joint ventures (2)     286,474       232,492  
Customs agents     2,531       62,074  
Advances to contractors     17,399       40,129  
Agreements (3)     18,613       18,911  
Advances to employees     1,073       1,084  
Advances to suppliers     300,711       252,308  
Short-term total   $ 5,378,926     $ 3,459,942  
Long term:                
Advances and deposits     172,708       144,482  
Total   $ 5,551,634     $ 3,604,424  

 

(1) Corresponds to the Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales (DIAN – National Tax and Customs Directorate), from advances on income tax for the 2012 tax year of $3,480,067 (2011, $1,771,005), self-withholdings and others in the amount of $1,272,058 (2011, $1,080,190).

 

(2) The following is a breakdown of the advances and deposits with partners in joint operations:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Contracts in which Ecopetrol is not the operator:                
Meta Petroleum Ltd.   $ 9,069     $ 45,140  
Occidental de Colombia Inc.     17,733       15,012  
Mansarovar Energy Colombia Ltd.     -       3,386  
Petrobras Colombia Limited     11,213       13,406  
Other operations     11,484       26,027  
Perenco Colombia Limited     12,041       27,324  
Emerald Energy PLC Suc Colombia     20,893       -  
Chevron Petroleum Company     7,065       4,197  
Repsol     -       50  
Vector Group     -       48  
Larsen & Toubro     -       3,919  
Petrobras Internacional Braspetro B.V.     589       4,866  
CEPSA Colombia S.A.     13,118       583  
Talismán Perú B.V., Sucursal del Perú     781       563  
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras     -       1,107  
Petrobras Energía Perú S.A.     197       147  
Maurel & Prom Colombia B.V.     747       -  
Lewis Energy Colombia     242       -  
Contracts for which Ecopetrol is the operator:                
Oleoducto Caño Limón     15,985       36,137  
Other operations     2,998       27,138  
Vanco     29,739       -  
Niscota     23,164       -  
La Cira     38,027       17,289  
JOA Caño Sur     3,619       3,681  
CRC 2004 – 01     1,935       2,401  
JOA Platanillo     -       71  
Bloque CPO-9     25,189       -  
Master Agreement TLU-1     11,514       -  
Operation Agreement TLU-3     13,477       -  
Heavy Crude Block CPE-2     15,655       -  
Total   $ 286,474     $ 232,492  

 

(3) Represents the resources transferred to workers as an advance for the education plan.

  

F- 26
 

 

(8) Prepaid expenses

 

The following provides details on prepaid expenses:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Insurance (1)   $ 106,257     $ 44,049  
Other (2)     4,398       8,325  
Total   $ 110,655     $ 52,374  

 

(1) Of the total insurance, $70,326 corresponds to Ecopetrol S.A., in effect up until May 2013, at a cost of $168,238 and amortization of $97,912 as at December 31, 2012.

 

As at December 31, 2012, the insurance by the other companies in the Group was: $19,072 for Refinería de Cartagena, $7,036 for Oleoducto Bicentenario, $4,543 for Ecopetrol America Inc., $2,868 for Equión, $1,265 for Propilco, $494 for Ocensa, $325 for Hocol, $150 for Oleoducto de Colombia, $110 for Bioenergy, $57 for Comai, $11 for Ecopetrol Perú.

 

(2) Mainly includes resources for the acquisition and maintenance of vehicles assigned to senior officials of Ecopetrol through leasing, managed under Contract No. 5203585 by Cavipetrol; electric power consumption by the Meta Power Plant for Hocol’s Ocelote field: $2,833, and prepaid medication by Hocol: $643.

 

(9) Deposits held in trust

 

This corresponds to trust funds for pensions and abandonment costs, created under Occidental de Colombia and received upon termination of the Asociación Cravo Norte – ACN contract, which came into effect in February 2011. The pension fund and the abandonment fund are administered by the Fiduciaria Bancolombia Trust. The following sets forth a breakdown of the funds as of the dates shown:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Abandonment fund   $ 306,651     $ 269,073  
Corficolombiana Securitization – ODL     127,784       20,565  
Administered by Cavipetrol     19,645       16,863  
Pension fund     16,920       14,431  
Other     7,810       429  
    $ 478,810     $ 321,361  

 

(10) Property, plant and equipment, net

 

Here is a breakdown of property, plant and equipment, net as of the dates shown:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Plant and equipment   $ 17,835,237     $ 17,611,968  
Construction in progress (1)     17,474,710       12,715,494  
Pipelines, networks and lines     19,799,381       17,991,919  
Buildings     4,295,597       3,559,908  
Equipment on deposit and in transit     1,394,003       1,198,856  
Computer equipment     580,225       569,159  
Transportation equipment and other assets     1,668,096       1,674,134  
Agricultural plantations     44,428       21,846  
Operating materials     140,237       76,986  
Land     745,632       679,997  
Total   $ 63,977,546     $ 56,100,267  
Accumulated depreciation     (26,278,595 )     (25,009,147 )
Allowance for property, plant and equipment depreciation (2)     (563,996 )     (1,057,740 )
Total   $ 37,134,955     $ 30,033,380  
                 

 

(1) Principally includes the following:

 

(i) Exploration and production investments in direct-operation production projects, such as development (Castilla, Chichimene and Apiay), and secondary recovery (Yarigui and Cupiagua), and the joint operations development projects (Piedemonte and La Cira Infantas).

 

F- 27
 

 

(ii) Major projects in refining such as the modernization of the Barrancabermeja Refinery, and the Master Plan for Industrial Services.

 

(iii) In transportation, the expansion of the Chichimene-Castilla-Apiay transportation system, the Cupiagua gas transportation system and the Master Plan for the Refinery Integration; as well as investments made on the Bicentenario Pipeline amounting $1,059,992.

 

(iv) The capitalized portion of interests amounting $63,526 related to the syndicated loan and bonds issued in dollars and peso.

 

(2) Here is a breakdown of the movement in the allowance for property, plant and equipment depreciations:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Opening balance as of January   $ 1,057,740     $ 1,064,204  
Additions to new allowances     315,627       41,948  
Adjustment to existing allowances     30,590       3,721  
Depreciation of assets     (680,128 )     (6,114 )
Recovery     (159,833 )     (46,019 )
Closing balance as of December   $ 563,996     $ 1,057,740  

 

Summary of property, plant and equipment as at December 31, 2012, including appreciation and allowances:

 

Type of asset   Adjusted cost     Accumulated
depreciation
    Appreciation     Allowance  
Plant and equipment   $ 17,835,237     $ (11,818,813 )   $ 5,160,255     $ (66,980 )
Pipelines, networks and lines     19,799,381       (11,628,422 )     8,533,118       (52,075 )
Work in progress     17,474,710       -       -       -  
Buildings     4,295,597       (1,608,846 )     2,267,564       (212,487 )
Equipment on deposit and in transit     1,394,003       -       -       -  
Computer equipment     580,225       (423,614 )     35,915       (4,632 )
Agricultural plantations     44,428       -       -       -  
Transportation equipment and other assets     1,668,096       (798,900 )     369,031       (211,831 )
Land     745,632       -       3,137,790       (9,944 )
Operating material     140,237       -       -       (6,047 )
Total   $ 63,977,546     $ (26,278,595 )   $ 19,503,673     $ (563,996 )

 

Summary of property, plant and equipment as at December 31, 2011:

 

Type of asset   Adjusted cost     Accumulated
depreciation
    Appreciation     Allowance  
Plant and equipment   $ 17,611,968     $ (11,551,625 )   $ 4,354,890     $ (348,240 )
Pipelines, networks and lines     17,991,919       (10,876,272 )     4,360,294       (354,404 )
Works in progress     12,715,494       -       -       -  
Buildings     3,559,908       (1,432,962 )     1,595,248       (122,010 )
Equipment on deposit and in transit     1,198,856       (11 )     -       -  
Computer equipment     569,159       (448,025 )     42,014       (15,612 )
Transportation equipment and other assets     1,695,980       (700,252 )     396,355       (215,419 )
Land     679,997       -       1,648,057       (145 )
Operating materials     76,986       -       -       (1,910 )
Total   $ 56,100,267     $ (25,009,147 )   $ 12,396,858     $ (1,057,740 )

 

There are no restrictions or pledges on assets, nor have they been offered as security.

 

Technical appraisals of fixed assets take place every three years in accordance with the stipulations of the Regime of Public Accounting. At the close of 2012, the last technical appraisal of assets was updated by the T.F. Auditores & Asesores firm.

 

F- 28
 

 

(11) Natural and environmental resources, net

 

The following is a breakdown of natural and environmental resources, net:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Amortizable oil investments (1)   $ 34,866,137     $ 29,991,872  
Less : Accumulated amortization of oil investments     (20,299,730 )     (18,055,338 )
      14,566,407       11,936,534  
Plugging and abandonment, facility dismantling and environmental recovery costs (2)     4,093,973       3,703,535  
Less : Accumulated amortization for facility abandonment     (2,100,281 )     (1,626,621 )
      1,993,692       2,076,914  
Reservoirs and appraisals (3)     701,590       701,590  
Less : Accumulated depletion     (632,941 )     (622,040 )
      68,649       79,550  
Exploration (4)     1,939,982       1,347,789  
Total   $ 18,568,730     $ 15,440,787  

 

(1) As at December 31, 2012, net capitalization of oil investments was approximately $3,821,276, mainly in the following fields: Chichimene, Castilla Norte, Rubiales, La Cira, Yarigui-Cantagallo, Casabe, Pauto, Apiay, Matachin Norte, Infantas, Suria, Cusiana, Quifa, Tibú, Guatiquia, and Caño Limón.

 

(2) Corresponds to the cost of abandoning production areas, updated in June and December of 2012.

 

(3) The appraisal of reserves is represented by the reservoirs received through the reverting of concession contracts worth $520,218, administered by Gerencia Sur and $181,372, administered by Magdalena Medio.

 

(4) The increase in 2012 is mainly due to an increase in the execution in Caño Sur, Quifa, Acacias and unconventional hydrocarbons. The reversal adjustment of the stratigraphic wells in the Caño Sur block also had an impact.

 

(12) Deferred charges

 

The following is a breakdown of deferred charges:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Other deferred charges, net (1)   $ 2,102,874     $ 2,326,838  
Deferred income tax     1,543,209       1,582,996  
Deferred monetary correction charges, net     338       40,226  
    $ 3,646,421     $ 3,950,060  

 

(1) Includes investments made in developing the business cooperation contract between Ecopetrol and Schlumberger, with the aim of obtaining incremental production at the Casabe field. These investments are amortized based on technical units of field production.

 

(13) Other assets

 

The following is a breakdown of other assets:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Goodwill (1)   $ 2,842,518     $ 3,163,762  
Intangibles (net): brands, licenses, patents, software     569,320       405,582  
Trust funds (2)     126,155       83,129  
National Royalties Fund (3)     67,815       72,909  
Other assets (4)     424,955       166,009  
    $ 4,030,763     $ 3,891,391  

 

(1) Goodwill corresponds mainly to Ecopetrol S.A. and is composed of:
F- 29
 

 

 

    2012  
Company   Acquisition
date
    Goodwill
amount
    Amortized
amount
    Pending
amortization
    Amortization
period (years)
 
Propilco S.A.     07/04/2008     $ 327,986     $ 86,572     $ 241,414       17.8  
Andean Chemicals     07/04/2008       357,629       94,400       263,229       17.8  
IPL Enterprises     17/03/2009       537,093       137,257       399,836       15  
Offshore International     06/02/2009       748,986       186,175       562,811       14  
Hocol Petroleum Limited     27/05/2009       748,948       157,334       591,614       16  
Equión Energía Limited     24/01/2011       972,409       189,695       782,714       10  
Bioenergy Zona Franca     30/08/2008       900       -       900          
Total           $ 3,693,951     $ 851,433     $ 2,842,518          

 

    2011  
Company   Acquisition
date
    Goodwill
amount
    Amortized
amount
    Pending
amortization
    Amortization
period (years)
 
Propilco S.A.     07/04/2008     $ 327,986     $ 68,002     $ 259,984       17.8  
Andean Chemicals     07/04/2008       357,629       74,152       283,477       17.8  
IPL Enterprises     17/03/2009       537,093       101,451       435,642       15  
Offshore International     06/02/2009       749,699       130,766       618,933       14  
Hocol Petroleum Limited     27/05/2009       801,911       109,686       692,225       16  
Equión Energía Limited     24/01/2011       957,513       84,912       872,601       10  
Bioenergy Zona Franca     30/08/2008       900       -       900          
Total           $ 3,732,731     $ 568,969     $ 3,163,762          

 

(2) Includes, i) $59,989 for contributions and shares in the Fondo Nacional de Hidrocarburos (National Hydrocarbons Fund) created to support future hydrocarbon investment, exploration and production contracts in smaller fields, for projects administered by the Fondo de Capital Privado de Hidrocarburos de Colombia (Colombia Hydrocarbons Private Capital Fund); ii) $48,567 corresponds to the Bicentenario de Colombia pipeline as follow: $28,779 for the open collective portfolio into which the money for the quarterly payment of interest on the syndicated loan is paid; $19,532 represents trusts to consign the money withheld as guarantee, by contract, and which is returned upon completion of the work; and $256 for the mercantile administration trust and payments for construction of the terrace by HGC Ingenieros; iii) $9,611 from the Colpet, Cóndor and Sagoc Fund to deal with potential contingencies in the liquidation of said former subsidiaries; iv) $4,238 for Bioenergy to purchase land; v) $2,325 corresponds to Equión for expenses linked to the medical plan; and iv) $1,425 from the Procuraduría Fund, created to fund projects for the general benefit of municipalities near the direct operations at the Cicuco field: Cicuco, Mompox and Talaigua Nueva (the purpose of the trust is to draft funds in advance of the projects to be implemented by the municipalities, through contracts with Incoder and the Ministry of the Environment).

 

(3) Corresponds to the deposits to the National Royalties Fund (FAEP). Its sole purpose is the payment of debts and financing for development projects and programs in hydrocarbon producing and non-producing municipalities and departments. Ecopetrol S.A. disburses amounts after the Ministry of Finance issues the corresponding approvals.

 

(4) Includes, for Ecopetrol, goods acquired through financial leasing in the amount of $105,205 ($73,140 in 2011), as well as restricted funds in the amount of $50,359 ($47,751 in 2011), represented by judicial deposits to pay for labor, civil and tax litigation, and third-party property improvements on assets received through concessions for the Colorados and Tumaco wells in the amount of $44,639 ($23,740 in 2011); ODL Finance in the amount of $162,806, mainly for BOMT contracts ($19,672 in 2011); Andean in the amount of $48,273 for assets received in partial payment for the Louisiana Green Fuels bond; OBC in the amount of $12,217; Hocol in the amount of $1,390; Other in the amount of $66 ($294 in 2011).

 

F- 30
 

 

(14) Valuations

 

Property, plant and equipment (1):   December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Plant and equipment   $ 5,160,255     $ 4,354,890  
Buildings     2,267,564       1,595,248  
Land     3,137,790       1,648,057  
Pipelines and lines     8,533,118       4,360,294  
Transportation equipment and other assets     369,031       396,355  
Communication and computer equipment     35,915       42,014  
    $ 19,503,673     $ 12,396,858  
Variable yield investments:                
Empresa de Energía de Bogotá S.A. E.S.P.   $ 647,119     $ 587,164  
Interconexión Eléctrica S.A.     496,126       590,417  
Zona Franca de Cartagena S.A.     -       1,363  
Sociedad Portuaria del Dique     -       12  
Sociedad Portuaria Olefinas     189       57  
Concentra S.A.     -       7  
Zona Franca Industrial     783       -  
      1,144,217       1,179,020  
Total   $ 20,647,890     $ 13,575,878  

 

(1) As at December 31, 2012, the property, plant and equipment valuations for Ecopetrol showed a $7,232,040 increase due to an update of the technical study of fixed-asset valuation with a cut-off date of December 31, 2012.

 

(15) Financial obligations

 

The following is a breakdown of financial obligations:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Current:                
Debt in national currency (1)   $ 2,116,790     $ 660,186  
Debt in foreign currency (2)     122,349       171,408  
Total current   $ 2,239,139     $ 831,594  
                 
Long term:                
Debt in national currency (1)   $ 2,856,688     $ 3,263,017  
Debt in foreign currency (2)     7,609,998       3,706,961  
Bonds issued (3)     1,000,000       1,000,000  
Total Long term   $ 11,466,686     $ 7,969,978  

 

(1) Corresponds mainly to Ecopetrol’s balance for the syndicated loan with 11 national banks at an initial amount of $2,220,200, earmarked for financing the Company’s investment programs. According to the terms of payment as at December 2012, the amount of $620,510 in capital has been amortized. Capital amortization in 2013 is estimated at $444,041. The loan was obtained with the following conditions:

 

Term: 7 years, including a 2-year grace period

Payment of interest: Starting in November 2009

Rate: DTF + 4% (anticipated quarterly rate)

Amortization: Every six months

 

F- 31
 

 

Guarantee: Ecopetrol S.A. granted a pledge over the stock shares owned either directly or indirectly on the following companies, thus reaching a 120% coverage of the loan amount. The shares given in guarantee were replaced by another contract between some banks and Ecopetrol S.A, on November 17, 2011. The value of guarantees according to the intrinsic value of the shares of companies in June 30, 2012 and translated into Colombian pesos with the current TRM at December 31, 2012 as follows:

 

Company   Value  
Hocol Petroleum Limited   $ 2,456,361  
Offshore International Group     439,498  
Polipropileno del Caribe S.A.     294,179  
Total   $ 3,190,038  

 

The breakdown of long-term payments corresponding mainly to Ecopetrol is as follows:

 

2014   $ 444,040  
2015     444,040  
2016     267,570  
    $ 1,155,650  

 

Ecopetrol currently does not expect any situation that might represent non-compliance with its obligations in the immediate future.

 

Furthermore, long-term payments mostly cover other financial obligations acquired by the companies in the Group, mainly by: Oleoducto Bicentenario de Colombia in the amount of $1,294,685 for 11 years at an interest rate of DTF+4.54%; Ocensa S.A. in the amount of $900,000 for 7 years with an interest rate of DTF+4%; the ODL Finance S.A. loan in the amount of $725,867; and the Bioenergy loan in the amount of $322,236 for 15 years with an average interest rate of DTF+3%.

 

Here is the breakdown of the guarantees granted by ODL as at December 31, 2012:

 

Irrevocable mercantile trust agreement between Oleoducto de los Llanos Orientales S.A. Sucursal Colombia and Fiduciaria Corficolombiana S.A., creating the ODL – Ecopetrol Issuer of ODL Securities – Ecopetrol trust funds.

 

Guarantee: Loan Securities ODL – Ecopetrol

 

According to the contract, ODL will use the resources from the placement to finance the project to build and commission the pipeline, and to return capital to the pipeline sponsors, as established in the Information Prospectus. Additionally the agreement considers the creation of a Trustee Fund ,to administer the resources from the Tariff payments for Ecopetrol to only be used to make the debt payments.

 

Four promissory notes were generated, with the following characteristics:

 

Nature of the
guarantee
  Counterpart   Start date   Maturity
date
  Amount
$
    Terms of the
guarantee
Bank guarantee   Bco. de Bogotá   06/01/2010   06/01/2017     520     Breach of undertakings
Bank guarantee   AV Villas   06/01/2010   06/01/2017     70     Breach of undertakings
Bank guarantee   Bco. de Occidente   06/01/2010   06/01/2017     105     Breach of undertakings
Bank guarantee   Bco. Popular   06/01/2010   06/01/2017     105     Breach of undertakings

 

Bioenergy has loans registered in the amount of $1,683, of which $914 is guaranteed through a mortgage on a field called “Predio La Esperanza” that has a book value of $4,096, with a surface area of 249.68 hectares, which backs the three financial obligations outlined below:

 

Bank   Start date   End date   Note
number
    Initial
value
    Rate     Duration     Balance as of
December 31,
2012
 
Bancolombia   14/02/2008   14/02/2013     570087615     $ 2,159     FTD YR + 8.54%     60 months     $ 359  
Bancolombia   22/07/2008   22/07/2013     570087988       1,402     FTD YR + 7.06%     60 months       350  
Bancolombia   22/07/2008   22/07/2013     570087989       618     FTD YR + 7.06%     60 months       206  
Total                   $ 4,179               $ 915  

 

These loans were granted by Bancolombia through a Finagro line. According to cash flow, it is expected that the payments will be made on the scheduled dates. Finagro is a governmental fund which seeks to increase the production and marketing activities of the agricultural and livestock sector and the Finagro line corresponds to lines of credit towards working capital and investment. It finances projects such as construction projects, purchase of machinery, purchase of animals and establishing crops. The beneficiaries are small, medium and large-scale and associate producers.

 

F- 32
 

 

(2) On July 23, 2009, the Ecopetrol S.A. Company issued unsecured and unsubordinated debt bonds (notes), with the right to register them with the SEC, maturing in 2019, for an amount of US$1,500 million. The registration took place on October 6, 2009. The notes were initially issued under Rule-144A/Regulation S

 

The terms of the notes are:

Coupon interest: 7.625%

 

Make Whole Premium: 50 basis points over U.S. Treasury securities. Interest payment dates are July 23 and January 23 of every year, starting on January 23, 2010. Maturity date: July 23, 2019.

 

The Company must comply with the various standard covenants, including the due and timely payment of interest and capital; no creation of collateral guarantees by Ecopetrol and its subordinates, except for authorized collateral; and the offer to purchase the bonds in the event of repurchasing for change of control, in accordance with the definition thereof in the issuance documents.

 

Refinería de Cartagena incurred indebtedness in the amount of $4,727,455 with foreign banks (Ex-Im Bank of the United States, HSBC USA, Bank of Tokyo Sumitomo BBVA – SACE, BBVA/HSBC/SEK, HSBCBank Plc-EKN) to finance the project to expand the new refinery. Amortization for these loans will begin in June 2014, for a period of 16 years.

 

(3) Through Resolution No. 3150 of October 20, 2010, Ecopetrol was authorized by the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit to issue, subscribe and place internal public debt bonds for an amount of up to one billion pesos, to finance Ecopetrol’s 2010 investment plan. Subsequently, through Resolution No. 2176 of November 11, 2010, the Company obtained the authorization of the Finance Superintendence of Colombia to register its internal public debt bonds with the National Register of Securities and Issuing Agencies, and to place them through public offering.

 

Here are the results of the issuing and placing of the internal public debt bonds:

 

Amount placed:   1 billion pesos
Issuance date:   December 1, 2010
Principal payment due:     At maturity
Series A:   Bonds denominated in pesos with a variable rate based on the consumer price index (CPI)
Redemption term:   5 years   7 years   10 years   30 years
Rate:   CPI + 2.80%   CPI + 3.30%   CPI + 3.94%   CPI + 4.90%
Amount (millions)   $ 97,100    138,700    479,900    284,300

  

(16) Accounts payable between related entities

 

The following is a breakdown of accounts payable and transactions with related entities:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Dividends payable (1)   $ 3,919,102     $ 3,424  
Suppliers     5,149,354       1,974,233  
Hydrocarbon purchases from the National Hydrocarbons Agency – ANH     208,425       775,329  
Partner advances     716,379       532,282  
Deposits received from third parties     247,301       777,444  
Various creditors     564,250       269,381  
Deductions at source for income tax and VAT     100,564       308,258  
Reimbursement of exploratory costs     -       42,797  
Total   $ 10,905,375     $ 4,683,148  
                 
Long term                
Other accounts payable     662,472       518,143  
Total long term   $ 662,472     $ 518,143  

 

(1) Represents the dividends payable as decreed at the Shareholders’ General Assembly held on March 22, 2012, in the amount of $12,335,009, less payments made in 2012 in the amount of $8,419,331. The amounts paid include dividends paid to shareholders who are in arrears in the payment of quotas generated by the purchasing of shares whose economic and political rights have been suspended pursuant to section 397 of the Commercial Code, and whose rights will be reinstated once the payments are up to date.

 

F- 33
 

 

(17) Taxes, contributions and duties payable

 

The following is a breakdown of taxes, contributions and duties payable:

 

Current:   December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Income tax and complementary taxes   $ 7,059,715     $ 7,517,178  
Global tax and surtax on gasoline (1)     135,266       118,257  
Sales tax payable     34,204       21,670  
Equity tax     579,329       594,391  
Industry and trade and other minor taxes     51,434       57,684  
Total current   $ 7,859,948     $ 8,309,180  
                 
Long term:                
Equity tax     555,054       1,035,971  
Total long term   $ 555,054     $ 1,035,971  
Total taxes   $ 8,415,002     $ 9,345,151  

 

(1) These taxes are levied on sales and/or consumption of regular and premium gasoline and diesel, and the application of the fees set by the Ministry of Mines and Energy. The funds collected are sent to the National Treasury Directorate of the Ministry of Finance and/or territorial entities.

 

Income tax

 

Income tax charged to expenses covers:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 
Current income tax   $ 7,095,874     $ 7,561,634     $ 3,201,041  
Deferred income tax debit     35,199       (49,865 )     (100,899 )
Deferred income tax credit     2,322       443,952       138,508  
Total   $ 7,133,395     $ 7,955,721     $ 3,238,650  

 

The deferred tax asset is calculated based on the value of accounting provisions only deductible for tax purposes, at the time of their utilization, and the value of asset inflation adjustments originated between 2004 and 2006. The deferred tax credit is the result of: a) the value of the differences in the policy for amortizing oil investments, which are amortized for accounting purposes using the technical units of production, but amortized for tax purposes using the straight-line method; b) the difference in the valuation of fixed yield investments, which are valuated using the market value method for accounting purposes but valuated using the straight-line method for tax purposes; and c) the difference in the amortized value of goodwill which amortization is accelerated for tax purposes.

 

Income tax returns can be reviewed by the tax authorities for up to two years following filing. To date, for Ecopetrol S.A. the tax return for 2010 is open for review.

 

Currently there are differences with the National Customs and Tax Directorate – DIAN with regard to the calculation and payment of the first income tax installment for 2004. It is the DIAN’s view that the value of the surtax for said year should have been included in the basis for the calculation. Having that the total amount of the income tax was paid. In practice, the amount in question relates to the impact on interests from the time the first installment and the total amount was paid. The result of this process will not affect the Company’s cash flow because in a related matter the DIAN compensated for the amounts in question directly from balances paid in excess by the Company originated in withholding taxes.

 

F- 34
 

 

 

The balance of deferred income tax assets and liabilities is as follows:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Deferred tax asset (Note 12):                
Opening balance   $ 1,593,015     $ 1,497,076  
Company acquisition     -       47,291  
Movement for the year     (35,199 )     49,864  
Conversion of reporting currency     (593 )     (1,216 )
Closing balance   $ 1,557,223     $ 1,593,015  
Deferred tax liability (Note 20):                
Opening balance     1,788,224       1,333,356  
Company acquisition     -       10,917  
Movement for the year     2,322       443,951  
Closing balance   $ 1,790,546     $ 1,788,224  

 

Transfer prices

 

As of 2004, income tax payers who had engaged in transactions with economic associates or related parties abroad, and/or with residents of countries considered to be tax havens, are under the obligation of determining, for income and additional tax purposes, their regular and extraordinary income, costs and deductions, and assets and liabilities, taking into account the denominated market prices and profit margins for these operations. Based on the opinion of the Company’s external consultants, no significant changes are expected for the 2012 tax year related to fulfilling the principle of full jurisdiction set out in section 260-1 of the Taxation Act, and there are no foreseen adjustments to the determination of income tax expenses for said year.

 

Equity tax

 

Pursuant to Law 1370 of 2009, the value of equity tax payable was to be registered just once, on January 1, 2011, to be paid in eight equal installments during 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014, by deadlines established by the National Government.

 

Based on the above and in accordance with accounting management decrees, Ecopetrol recognized the value of equity tax payable and the corresponding charge to results for the proportional value corresponding to 2011 and 2012. The outstanding balance payable was registered as a deferred charge amortizable in subsequent years.

 

Tax reform

 

The Congress of the Republic adopted Law 1607 of December 26, 2012, which introduces significant reforms to the Colombian tax system, in particular:

 

· The income tax rate was reduced from 33% to 25% starting in 2013, and the Equality Income Tax ( impuesto de renta para la equidad - CREE), was created with a rate of 9% from 2013 to 2015 and 8% starting in 2016; there are some differences between the treatment used to determine this tax and the one used to determine ordinary income tax.

 

· Those who pay the Equality Income Tax do not have to pay the SENA and ICBF contributions for employees who earn less than 10 minimum monthly wages; this exemption will have an extensive effect on contributions to the health plan starting in January 1, 2014.

 

· The concept of permanent establishment was defined, and is understood as fixed premises through which a foreign Company does business in Colombia.

 

· There is a change in the way that taxable and non-taxable profits are calculated for companies that distribute profits to partners or shareholders.

 

New rules on the transfer price regime have been introduced. Among other things, these rules extend the regime’s scope of application to transactions with economic associates located in duty-free zones, and to some taxpayer transactions with foreign entities linked to a permanent establishment in Colombia and abroad.

 

F- 35
 

 

(18) Labor and pension obligations

 

The following is a breakdown of labor and pension obligations:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Current:                
Leave   $ 81,062     $ 71,838  
Bonuses, increases and allowances     100,635       75,691  
Severance     46,398       42,241  
Salaries and pensions payable     3,559       21,453  
Interest on severance     5,180       4,438  
Other     20,095       17,661  
Total Current   $ 256,929     $ 233,322  
                 
Long term:                
Actuarial liability for health and education (1)     3,992,829       3,109,480  
Retirement pensions, joint ventures     71,052       70,789  
Other     6,863       9,960  
Total long term   $ 4,070,744     $ 3,190,229  
Total   $ 4,327,673     $ 3,423,551  

 

(1) The actuarial calculations for health and education for Ecopetrol S.A. were prepared by applying the mortality tables updated in 2010 and using a technical interest rate of 4.8%. The value of future health and education payments was estimated by applying an increase of 4.755%, which corresponds to the average inflation rate registered by the DANE during the last three years, to the year of calculation, plus an additional 1.5%, taking into account the Company’s real growth. As a result of the 2010 change in the accounting principle for amortization, as at December 31, 2012, the portion to be amortized is 11%, which is equivalent to $454,973.

 

The amortized actuarial liability for health is indicated below:

 

Concept   December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Actuarial calculation of health obligations   $ 4,062,323       3,310,894  
Minus – actuarial calculation pending amortization     (454,973 )     (555,894 )
Amortized actuarial liability   $ 3,607,350       2,755,000  

 

The difference in amortized actuarial liability is described below:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
    Variation  
Health:                        
Active personnel   $ 401,883     $ 229,309     $ 172,574  
Retirees     3,205,467       2,525,691       679,776  
Education:                        
Active personnel     37,736       27,996       9,740  
Retirees     347,743       326,484       21,259  
Total:   $ 3,992,829     $ 3,109,480     $ 883,349  

 

F- 36
 

 

(19) Estimated liabilities and Provision

 

The following is a breakdown of estimated liabilities and provision:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Current:                
Provision for legal proceedings (1) (see Note 31)   $ 783,692     $ 688,191  
Provision for pension obligations     500       500  
Provision for abandonment, facility dismantling and environmental recovery costs (2)     20,667       120,128  
Other Provision (3)     974,510       589,181  
Provision for contingencies (4)     92,966       297,193  
Total current   $ 1,872,335     $ 1,695,193  
Long term:                
Provision for abandonment, facility dismantling and environmental recovery costs (2)     3,885,726       3,634,229  
Provision for community members (5)     424,500       418,318  
Provision for legal proceedings (1)     9,202       11,079  
Other Provision     56,576       21,203  
Total long term   $ 4,376,004     $ 4,084,829  
Total   $ 6,248,339     $ 5,780,022  

 

(1) The following shows the movement in the provision for legal proceedings at December 2012:

 

    Number of
proceedings
    Provision
amounts
 
December 31, 2010 opening balance   $ 822     $ 663,932  
Additions (new provision)     271       42,859  
Adjustment to existing provision     -       60,067  
Recovery from transfer of proceedings     71       227,542  
Proceedings ended     (273 )     (229,644 )
Proceedings transferred     (107 )     (76,565 )
December 31, 2011 closing balance   $ 784     $ 688,191  
Additions (new provision)     313       412,177  
Adjustment to existing provision     (410 )     (310,150 )
Recovery     (5 )     (6,526 )
December 31, 2012 closing balance   $ 682     $ 783,692  

 

(2) The following shows the total movements in the provision for abandonment, facility dismantling and environmental recovery costs:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Opening balance   $ 3,754,357     $ 3,134,387  
Additions     342,257       619,505  
Withdrawals and use     (174,359 )     -  
Conversion into the reporting currency     (15,862 )     465  
Closing balance   $ 3,906,393     $ 3,754,357  

 

Most of these abandonment allowances were caused by Ecopetrol S.A., in the amount of $3,804,199.

 

(3) Mainly includes allowances created for the purpose of anticipating potential nature-related and other events that could affect transportation facilities and have an impact on the regions where there is a presence. Starting January 2012, three large-scale projects were created: the Dosquebradas Project, the Integrity Program and the Contingency Program. Additionally, includes allowances in subsidiaries mainly such as: Mainly Refinería de Cartagena, in the amount of $397,378, for goods and services; Equión in the amount of $116,313 for partnership agreements; Oleoducto Bicentenario in the amount of $47,415; Ocensa in the amount of $48,399; Hocol in the amount of $43,384; Ecopetrol America Inc. in the amount of $16,885 and Propilco in the amount of $4,411.

 

F- 37
 

 

(4) This is represented mainly by: (i) $26,029 for potential PDVSA claims for payment of work to clean up and decontaminate Lake Maracaibo in Venezuela, and $66,380 for situations with environmental implications, and (ii) $152 corresponding to the success-based fees for the representative in the litigation against Ecopetrol S.A. initiated by Industrias Crizasa.

 

(5) Includes the interim relief ordered by the Council of State in its decree of June 24, 1994 in the invalidity action brought by the Ministry of Mines and Energy against Comuneros (community members) of Santiago de las Atalayas and Pueblo Viejo de Cusiana, corresponding to the attachment and seizure of the payments to be made by Ecopetrol for royalties, based on Royalty contracts No. 15, 15A, 16 and 16A, declared null and void by the Council of State in its ruling of September 13, 1999, in which it was ordered that said interim relief should be cancelled and that the attached and seized amounts should be handed over to the State – the Ministry of Mines. Ecopetrol has capacity as receiver. Of said amount, $90,752 corresponds to the value initially recognized by Ecopetrol, as well as the valuation of the fund containing the resources; $333,748 corresponds to generated interest. In a ruling on December 12, 2012, notified by edict on January 21, 2013, the Council of State declared that the special plea for reconsideration filed by the Comuneros was dismissed. Said special plea for reconsideration was filed on December 13, 1999 by the Comuneros.

 

(20) Other long-term liabilities

 

The following is a breakdown of other long-term liabilities:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Deferred income tax credit   $ 1,790,546     $ 1,788,224  
Advances received from Ecogas for BOMTs     369,517       676,628  
Credit for deferred monetary correction     493       138,064  
Other liabilities     111,288       181,397  
Total   $ 2,271,844     $ 2,784,313  

 

(21) Non-controlling interest

 

The following is a breakdown of non-controlling interest equity:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Bioenergy   $ 12,474     $ 11,219  
ODL Finance S.A.     304,584       237,214  
Ocensa     866,774       508,389  
Oleoducto de Colombia     84,632       90,473  
Oleoducto Bicentenario     313,026       318,147  
Equión     1,020,677       1,087,189  
Total   $ 2,602,167     $ 2,252,631  

 

(22) Equity

 

Subscribed and paid capital

 

Ecopetrol’s authorized capital is $15,000,000 divided into 60,000,000,000 ordinary nominative shares with a nominal value of $250 each, of which 41,116,698,456 shares have been subscribed, representing 11.51% in non-controlling interest and 88.49% held by state entity shareholders. The value of the reserve shares amounts to $4,720,825 composed of 18,883,301,544 shares.

 

F- 38
 

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

As at December 31, 2012, mainly corresponds to: (i) the surplus with respect to its nominal value derived from the sale of shares upon capitalization in 2007, in the amount of $4,700,883, (ii) $31,225, the value generated by the process of placing the shares on the secondary market, arising from the calling of guarantees from debtors in arrears, according to the stipulations of Article 397 of the Commercial Code, and (iii) to the surplus over nominal value arising from the sale of shares awarded in the second round, which took place in September 2011, in the amount of $2,222,441.

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Additional paid-in capital   $ 6,954,549     $ 6,944,159  
Additional paid-in capital receivable     (302 )     (156,015 )
Total   $ 6,954,247     $ 6,788,144  

 

Effect of applying the Public Accounting Regime (RCP)

 

Corresponds to the transfer of negative balances derived from devaluations of property, plant and equipment, as established by the Public Accounting Regime (RCP) from 2008.

 

This heading also shows the responsibilities pending decision, arising from the proceedings on loss of materials, through enforcement of the process established in the above-mentioned standard.

 

Equity reserves

 

The legal reserve is made up of 10% of net income and can be used as compensation for losses or for distribution in the event of liquidation of the Company.

 

On March 22, 2012, the results for the 2011 period were considered by the General Assembly of Shareholders, at which it was decided that the legal reserve should be increased by $187,958 for a total of $5,139,587.

 

Similarly, increases were made in the reserves for investment programs, in the amount of $2,581,994, and in the reserves to fulfill Regulatory.

 

Decree 2336 of 1995 (valuation at market prices) in the amount of $343,372.

 

The following is a breakdown of the reserves:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Legal   $ 5,139,587     $ 4,951,629  
Occasional for investment programs     6,713,082       4,131,088  
Regulatory Decree 2336 of 1995     440,067       96,695  
Total   $ 12,292,736     $ 9,179,412  

 

Incorporated institutional equity

 

Corresponds to the product of commercial activity linked mainly to the following association contracts: Nare, Matambo, Garcero, Corocora, Estero, Caracara, for the Sardinas 6, Remache Norte 3, Abejas 3, Jaguar T5 and T6 wells, Orocué, the Guarilaque 7 well; Campo Rico for the Candalay, Jordán 5, Remache Norte 2 and 5, Abejas 2 and Vigia wells, and the incorporation of the Cocorná materials warehouse.

 

F- 39
 

 

(23) Memorandum accounts

 

The following is a breakdown of memorandum accounts:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Debtor:                
Exploitation rights – Decree 727 of 2007 (1)   $ 65,885,263     $ 67,496,739  
Other contingent rights and debtor accounts (2)     31,953,744       21,023,083  
Costs and expenses (deductible and non-deductible)     22,585,481       19,534,605  
Autonomous pension trust (3)     11,866,064       11,303,177  
Securities given in custody and guarantee     5,544,415       5,314,653  
Implementation of investment projects     129,455       751,827  
Legal proceedings     650,918       584,810  
Tax differences     6,356,087       4,212,978  
Total   $ 144,971,427     $ 130,221,872  

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Creditor:                
Legal proceedings   $ 33,611,100     $ 34,791,375  
Goods received in custody (4)     27,329,613       28,326,369  
Contractual guarantees (5)     14,327,340       7,648,023  
Autonomous pension trust (7)     11,730,386       11,544,801  
Non-tax liabilities     10,170,665       9,890,185  
Other contingent obligations (6)     9,183,073       10,939,385  
Potential obligations – pension liabilities (7)     809,596       1,222,955  
Non-taxed income     5,821,444       4,818,819  
Mandate agreements (8)     1,416,574       1,400,596  
Administration funds – Decrees 1939 of 2001, and 2652 of 2002     973,565       973,151  
Future BOMT payments     108,769       228,941  
Total   $ 115,482,125     $ 111,784,600  
    $ 260,453,552     $ 242,006,472  

 

(1) Reserves evaluated as at December 31, 2012 based on the volumes in the audited reserves study and applying the average price set by SEC-approved regulations.

 

On March 7, 2007, Decree 727, which replaced Decree 2625 of 2000, was issued featuring the regulations for valuating reserves and accounting for the Nation’s hydrocarbon reserves in the Company’s financial statements. The decree also establishes that the value of the hydrocarbon exploration or production rights it owns must be recorded. Said value is recorded under memorandum accounts, in accordance with the opinion provided by the National Accounts Office (CGN); however, the memorandum accounts are not part of the Company’s balance sheet.

 

(2) The balance corresponds mainly to: (i) the balance of tax memorandum accounts in the amount of $22,590,844, which reflect the differences between the values of both equity and result accounts, taken from the 2011 tax return, and the accounting balances. The differences are derived from concepts such as valuations, allowances that are not accepted for tax purposes, the difference in the amortization method for oil investments, which is done using the units of production method for accounting purposes, and using the straight-line method for tax purposes, and the effect of the adjustment for inflation, (ii) securities in custody in the amount of $2,253,560, and (iii) other contingent rights, mainly for recognition of the right linked to high prices for the Quifa contract in the amount of $262,166.

 

(3) Reflects the contingent right (debtor account) on resources put in the autonomous pension trust, to pay transferred pension liabilities, in order to control the existence of liquid resources in the stand-alone equity fund. The value transferred on December 31, 2012, which is $11,866,064 ($10,092,528 on the date of transfer, December 31, 2008), corresponds to pension liability for monthly pension payments, shares and pension bonds; the amounts tied to health and education are within Ecopetrol’s pension liability. The transferred resources, and their yield, cannot change destination or be returned to the Company until all pension obligations have been fulfilled.

 

F- 40
 

 

Here is a breakdown of autonomous pension trust funds:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Consorcio Ecopensiones 2011   $ 2,855,165     $ 2,716,510  
Porvenir S.A.     2,609,500       2,493,719  
Consorcio Pensiones Ecopetrol 2011     2,151,960       2,052,000  
Unión temporal Skandia-HSBC     2,142,634       2,032,891  
Consorcio Bogotá-Colpatria-Occidente     2,106,805       2,008,057  
Total   $ 11,866,064     $ 11,303,177  

 

(4) Made up mainly of the value of royalties corresponding to the balance of Ecopetrol reserves, in the amount of $27,222,901, calculated according to SEC-approved regulations. This heading also includes the inventories of products sold and materials, pending delivery to clients, in the amount of $37,203, as well as goods received in concession custody: Coveñas, $41,660; Pozos Colorados, $21,058; and Tumaco, $6,083.

 

(5) Mainly for contracts pending execution, in pesos, dollars and Euros, updated to the official exchange rate as at December 31, 2012 in the amount of $14,327,340; stand-by letters of credit, which guarantee contracts signed by Ecopetrol in the amount of $327,705; and documentary letters in the amount of $170.

 

(6) Includes, mainly, the closed pledge of $3,190,038 on the shares that Ecopetrol S.A. holds directly or indirectly in Hocol Petroleum Limited, Offshore International Group and Polipropileno del Caribe S.A., with 120% coverage of the credit amount granted by the national bank. (see note 15 (1)).

 

Equión has two lending-rate stand-by letters of credit, which total US$4,583,280, and seek to guarantee, to the ANH, the fulfillment and execution of contracts No. 32 and 33 of the Ronda Caribe Sector, for the RC-4 and RC-5 Blocks.

 

Issuing entity: Helm Bank S.A.

 

Card N.   Beneficiary   Purpose   Start date   End date   USD Value     COP Value  
T000126   Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos   Guarantee the fulfillment and execution of Contract No. 33 of the Ronda Caribe Sector, Block RC-5   28-nov-10   28-feb-14   $ (2,352,480 )   $ (4,159,725,710 )
T000127   Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos   Guarantee the fulfillment and Execution of Contract No. 32 of the Ronda Caribe Sector, Block RC-4   28-nov-10   28-feb-14   $ (2,230,800 )   $ (3,944,567,484 )

 

The risk that the guarantees will be disbursed remains low.

 

(7) Made up of the value of the actuarial calculation of monthly pension payments, shares and bonds as at December 31, 2012, plus the percentage of amortization of the 2010 reserve that arose from the change in accounting principle for amortization. At the end of 2012, the amortizable reserve was 7%, equivalent to $809,596.

 

The balance of amortized actuarial liability is as follows:

 

Concept   December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
Actuarial calculation of the obligation for monthly pension payments and pension bonds   $ 12,539,982     $ 12,767,756  
Minus – Actuarial calculation pending amortization     (809,596 )     (1,222,955 )
Amortized actuarial liability   $ 11,730,386     $ 11,544,801  

 

The balance of stand-alone pension funds as well as the value of the actuarial reserve and the amortized value of the pension liability for monthly payments are included in the memorandum accounts.

 

F- 41
 

 

The actuarial calculation was carried out using a technical interest rate of 4%. The increase in salaries, pensions in cash and pensions in kind was calculated using the average inflation rate by the Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE – National Administrative Department of Statistics), for the three years immediately preceding the calculation year.

 

As at December 31, 2012, the number of people covered by the actuarial pension calculation was 13,210.

 

(8) Includes the value of assets received in custody from Refinería de Cartagena S.A. in fulfillment of obligations acquired under the mandate contract signed between Ecopetrol and that Company to operate the refinery, namely: product inventories in the amount of $429,108 (2011, $362,251), materials inventory in the amount of $30,269 (2011, $34,253), and property, plant and equipment in the amount of $957,197 (2011, $1,004,092).

 

(24) Revenues

 

The following is a breakdown of revenues:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 
National sales:                        
Mid-distillates   $ 11,132,983     $ 9,742,346     $ 7,099,176  
Gasoline     5,697,178       5,206,873       4,302,282  
Services     2,077,858       1,762,060       1,947,829  
Natural gas     1,108,164       1,212,310       1,159,245  
Other products     2,100,780       2,019,225       1,885,361  
L.P.G. and propane     492,440       727,111       627,361  
Asphalts     369,768       402,923       326,737  
Crude (1)     572,969       230,459       117,186  
    $ 23,552,140     $ 21,303,307     $ 17,465,177  
Recognition of price differential (2)     809,773       2,251,322       740,682  
    $ 24,361,913     $ 23,554,629     $ 18,205,859  
Foreign sales:                        
Crude (1)   $ 35,884,535     $ 33,418,191     $ 18,073,357  
Fuel oil     4,283,814       4,447,657       2,377,266  
Natural gas (1)     563,412       508,066       146,063  
Gasoline and turbo fuel     1,182,367       1,663,222       698,068  
Propylene     -       -       109,271  
Other products     1,329,983       871,105       831,129  
Diesel     1,223,159       1,482,625       1,638,044  
    $ 44,467,270     $ 42,390,866     $ 23,873,198  
Premium income net     22,819       22,019       10,688  
    $ 44,490,089     $ 42,412,885     $ 23,883,886  
    $ 68,852,002     $ 65,967,514     $ 42,089,745  

 

(1) Corresponds to crude oil sales by Ecopetrol in the amount of $30,758,736, Hocol in the amount of $3,738,837, Equión in the amount of $1,862,183, and Ecopetrol America Inc. in the amount of $97,748.

 

(2) Corresponds to the application of Decree 4839 of December 2008, which defined the procedure for price differentials (value generated by the difference between parity price and regulated price, which can be positive or negative).
F- 42
 

 

(25) Cost of sales

 

The following is a breakdown of the cost of sales:

 

  December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 
Variable Costs:                      
Hydrocarbon purchases – ANH (1) $ 8,452,336     $ 8,048,981     $ 5,335,946  
Imported products (2)   9,447,041       8,840,450       5,680,601  
Purchases of crude in association and concession   7,207,707       6,701,500       4,548,193  
Amortization and depletion   3,000,758       2,642,132       2,280,355  
Hydrocarbon transportation services   1,152,081       938,036       542,010  
Purchases of other products and gas   618,715       673,545       316,192  
Electric power   306,942       257,110       205,102  
Processing materials   276,550       263,329       180,676  
Volume adjustments and other allocations   (109,850 )     (360,165 )     (460,938 )
Unit-of-production depreciation   105,805       125,482       55,473  
  $ 30,458,085     $ 28,130,400     $ 18,683,610  
Fixed Costs:                      
Services contracted in associations   2,037,205       1,791,681       1,469,586  
Maintenance   1,923,736       1,570,912       1,143,724  
Labor costs   1,095,479       1,001,102       940,111  
Depreciation   1,886,620       1,809,546       1,548,797  
Contracted services   1,088,597       872,565       857,431  
Non-capitalized project costs   561,416       461,757       421,239  
Operating materials and supplies   372,165       278,740       345,326  
Taxes and contributions   401,576       387,788       254,489  
Amortization of deferred charges, intangibles and insurance   171,902       73,070       72,680  
General costs   411,641       258,283       205,021  
Amortization of the actuarial calculation for health and education   127,086       68,740       18,442  
  $ 10,077,423     $ 8, 574,184     $ 7,276,846  
  $ 40,535,508     $ 36,704,584     $ 25,960,456  

 

(1) Corresponds to Ecopetrol’s crude oil and gas purchases from the ANH derived from national production, both by the Company in direct operations and third parties.

 

(2) Corresponds mainly to Ecopetrol in the amount of $6,863,138 for the importation of very low-sulphur diesel, to improve the quality of local products and diluting agents to help transport heavy crude. It also includes purchases from Reficar in the amount of $1,903,443 (imported Acem, Ron 95 Gasoline, Ron 92 Gasoline and Diesel), Propilco in the amount of $647,593 and Comai in the amount of $32,867 (propylene, titanium dioxide and polyethylene).

 

F- 43
 

 

(26) Operating expenses

 

The following is a breakdown of the operating expenses:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 
Administration:                        
Amortizations (1)   $ 313,344     $ 283,304     $ 189,261  
Labor expenses     321,643       269,828       213,739  
General expenses     172,735       203,431       149,772  
Depreciations     35,233       24,979       19,739  
Rentals and leases     12,441       10,878       7,986  
Amortization of the actuarial calculation for health and education     8,896       4,715       1,052  
Maintenance     5,756       5,294       2,611  
Taxes     4,932       216,488       19,363  
    $ 874,980     $ 1,018,917     $ 603,523  
Operation and projects:                        
Projects expenses (2)   $ 237,280     $ 293,478     $ 321,580  
Exploration expenses (3)     1,419,530       959,938       1,465,537  
General expenses (4)     678,022       570,321       300,837  
Labor expenses     277,430       190,166       69,490  
Taxes     232,622       192,064       155,662  
Transportation via gas pipelines     136,573       122,780       125,376  
Maintenance     19,018       5,488       1,786  
Gas supply default     764       2,511       85,222  
Operation allowances (5)     233,979       33,229       252,828  
Amortizations     6       1,058       -  
    $ 3,235,224     $ 2,371,033     $ 2,778,318  
    $ 4,110,204     $ 3,389,950     $ 3,381,841  

 

(1) During the 2012 period, at Ecopetrol S.A. the amount of $274,558 was amortized (corresponding mainly to the goodwill of the following companies: Propilco, Ocensa, Hocol, Offshore and Equión, in the amount of $274,558), Reficar in the amount of $9,156 corresponding to mine and oil policies and legal stability, and Equión in the amount of $9,197 for software licenses.

 

(2) The decrease compared to the previous year is mainly due to the reclassification of the cost at Ecopetrol of the man hours for technical management in 2012 in the amount of $182,655, offset by the increase in projects, notably the development of petrochemical potential, the modernization of Barranca and the environmental management plan.

 

(3) The amount of $591,412 corresponds to Ecopetrol S.A., mainly for seismic studies in the amount of $297,966, and unsuccessful explorations in the amount of $188,875, the most significant of which were: estimates in the amount of $36,800; (dry well estimate for Tarabita-1 in the amount of $12,505, Tingua-1 in the amount of $6,665, Trasgo-2 in the amount of $5,365, Embrujo-1 in the amount of $3,310, CSE8 in the amount of $2,727), environmental recovery and non-capitalized items in the amount of $83,885. It also includes exploratory projects by the companies in the group, as follows: Ecopetrol Oleo é Gas do Brasil in the amount of $242,557, of which $63,428 was for seismic studies and $179,129 for dry wells (Itauna, Canario and Sabia wells); Hocol in the amount of $239,338, of which $127,133 was for seismic studies, $92,826 for dry wells (Granate and Santa Fe 1 wells), and $19,379 for other exploratory expenses; Ecopetrol America Inc. in the amount of $217,214, of which $73,906 was for seismic studies, and $143,308 for dry wells (Candy bars wells 1 and 2); Equión in the amount of $121,493, of which $6,302 was for seismic studies and $115,190 for dry wells (Mapale well); and Ecopetrol Perú in the amount of $8,739 for other exploratory expenses.

 

(4) Corresponds to Ecopetrol in the amount of $590,876, mainly for agreements with the National Police in the amount of $225,019, freight expenses and customs operation for foreign sales in the amount of $111,532, other agreements in the amount of $101,751, and insurance in the amount of $28,298. It also includes Propilco in the amount of $69,199 (transportation of goods, commissions and legal expenses), Refinería de Cartagena in the amount of $20,622 (freight, LPG regulation and operation and marketing agreement with Ecopetrol), Comai in the amount of $2,979 (transportation, freight and handling services), and Hocol in the amount of $1,143 (fees for crude oil marketing, paid to Ecopetrol S.A.).

 

F- 44
 

 

(5) The detail of operation provisions for the year ended at December 31 of 2012, 2011 and 2010 respectively is as follows:

 

Recovery of operation provisions   2012     2011     2010  
Inventories   $ 11,966     $ 3,263     $ 29,481  
Property, plant and equipment     171,102       46,019       55,717  
Portfolio recovery     225       365       68,772  
    $ 183,293     $ 49,647     $ 153,970  
                         
Operation provisions                        
Inventories   $ (14,459 )   $ (8,505 )   $ (9,743 )
Property, plant and equipment     (315,627 )     (41,948 )     (227,266 )
Portfolio     (87,186 )     (32,423 )     (169,789 )
    $ (417,272 )   $ (82,876 )   $ (406,798 )
    $ (233,979 )   $ (33,229 )   $ (252,828 )

 

(27) Financial expenses, net

 

The following is a breakdown of the net financial expenses:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 
Income:                        
Foreign exchange gain (1)   $ 4,087,029     $ 7,783,658     $ 4,265,882  
Equity method earnings     125,474       141,647       83,574  
Dividends in cash     32,541       10,135       30,941  
Yields and interest     383,795       193,087       156,336  
Hedging transactions (2)     20,906       88,317       80,445  
Other     5,647       5,144       9,202  
Investment portfolio valuation earnings     178,076       100,373       80,111  
    $ 4,833,468     $ 8,322,361     $ 4,706,491  
Expenses:                        
Foreign exchange loss (1)     4,396,159       7,819,025       4,412,224  
Hedging transactions (2)     4,253       890,008       99,139  
Interest     581,597       415,222       145,910  
Other minor expenses     19,092       57,621       10,101  
Equity method loss     197       372       802  
Administration and issuance of securities     59       44,415       526  
    $ 5,001,357     $ 9,226,663     $ 4,668,702  
 Net   $ (167,889 )   $ (904,302 )   $ 37,789  

 

(1) The accumulated loss due to the exchange rate difference as of December 2012 was $309,130, mainly due to the appreciation of the peso. The accumulated variance as of December 2012 was (8.98)%. As of December 2011, there were earnings of $35,367 as a result of accumulated devaluation of 1.50%, which represents a $344,497 greater loss compared to December 2012.

 

(2) The net results of hedging transactions as at December 31, 2012 correspond to those derived from the exchange rate in the amount of $681 for Ecopetrol and $15,972 for Hocol.

 

(28) Pension expenses

 

The following is a breakdown of pension expenses:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 
Amortization of actuarial calculation and pensions (1)   $ 688,693       443,890       146,717  
Health care services     204,269       205,928       171,636  
Education services     55,493       56,480       59,273  
    $ 948,455       706,298       377,626  

 

F- 45
 

 

(1) At Ecopetrol in December 2012, the actuarial calculation study was updated. The actuarial calculations for health care and education were done using the mortality tables updated in 2010, and using the technical interest rate of 4.8%. To estimate the value of future benefits, an increase of 4.755% was used, reflecting the average interest rate registered by the DANE in the three years immediately preceding the calculation year, plus an additional percentage of 1.5% taking into account the Company’s real growth.

 

(29) Inflation gain

 

Corresponds to the net amortization of the deferred monetary correction in the amounts of $97,663, $21,836 and $22,030 for 2012, 2011 and 2010 respectively.

 

(30) Other expenses, net

 

The following is a breakdown of other expenses net:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 
Other income:                        
Provision recovery (1)   $ 531,465     $ 616,462     $ 211,545  
Other minor income     213,277       172,013       65,252  
Deferred BOMT income     17,408       -       -  
Recovery of expenses     61,443       127,580       99,900  
Recovery of exploration expenses     23,722       25,543       40,336  
Compensation received     19,512       10,045       9,253  
Income from services     18,551       6,720       28,779  
Earnings from the sale of materials and property, plant and equipment     5,052       9,443       18,837  
Recovery of services to associates     4,743       219,952       15,535  
Income from ceded rights     725       30,396       19,222  
Income from discovered non-developed fields             855       28,097  
    $ 895,898     $ 1,219,009     $ 536,756  
Other expenses:                        
Taxes     724,785       641,947       343,128  
Provision (2)     616,115       724,370       145,722  
Other minor expenses     231,293       275,367       413,276  
Gas pipeline availability under BOMT contracts     -       12,026       63,947  
Fuel losses     83,039       78,816       140,153  
Audit quota     55,786       49,884       49,435  
Contributions and donations     39,293       27,940       23,906  
Loss from decrease in fixed assets     1,495       51,143       6,295  
Loss from decrease in goodwill     -       300       287,918  
    $ 1,751,806     $ 1,861,793     $ 1,473,780  
    $ (855,908 )   $ (642,784 )   $ (937,024 )

 

(1) The breakdown of provision recovery as at December 31 is as follows:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 
Legal proceedings   $ 259,450     $ 229,345     $ 80,237  
Other recovery     272,015       387,117       131,208  
    $ 531,465     $ 616,462     $ 211,445  

 

(2) The breakdown of provision as at December 31 is as follows:

 

    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 
Legal proceedings   $ 414,322     $ 330,468     $ 125,888  
Potential obligations     56,928       29,883       -  
Pension transfer (*)     -       241,624       -  
Other provisions     144,865       122,395       19,834  
    $ 616,115     $ 724,370     $ 145,722  

 

F- 46
 

 

(*) Corresponds to the effect occurred only in 2011 of comparing the yield of autonomous trusts and Ecopetrol’s transferred obligation, which has been greater than the generated yield.

 

(31) Contingencies

 

Ecopetrol S.A.

 

The following is a summary of the most significant legal proceedings with claims above $10,000 million, for which allowances have been recognized, in accordance with the evaluations of the Company’s internal and external advisors:

 

Proceeding   Suit   Allowance
amount
December 31,
2012
    Allowance
amount
December 31,
2011
 
Garcero association contract   Class action suit against Ecopetrol S.A., the Nation, the Ministry of Mines and others, on the extension of the Garcero association contract.   $ 155,184     $ 204,189  
Municipalities of Aguazul and Tauramena   Class action suit. Contributions to the solidarity and electric-power-generation income redistribution fund, pursuant to Law 142 of 1994.     220,044       139,688  
Municipality of Arauca   Class action suit. Contributions to the solidarity and electric-power-generation income redistribution fund, pursuant to Law 142 of 1994.     283,010       121,051  
Department of Tolima (*)   Class action suit for the reassessment of royalties with the 20% stipulated in Law 141 of 1994.     -       82,287  
Salary impact – saving stimulus suit   Apply the salary impact to the amounts paid under the saving stimulus heading and consequently reassess social benefit payments (legal and extralegal) and monthly pension payments, from the date at which Ecopetrol S.A. began recognizing it.   $ 18,689     $ 20,154  

 

As at December 31, 2012, the balance of the allowance for legal proceedings was $770,922 (2011, $682,158).

 

( * )      The State Council, in its decision of May 30, 2012, issued on June 5, decreed null and void all of the proceedings in the Department of Tolima’s contract litigation against Ecopetrol, Petrobras and Nexen, based on the ruling handed down by the Administrative Tribunal of Tolima on February 20, 2007, and made it binding on the Ministry of Mines and Energy.

 

Other companies in the Group

 

The following is a summary of the most significant legal proceedings of other companies in the Group as at December 31, 2012 and 2011:

 

Group
Company
  Proceeding   Suit   Allowance
amount
December
31, 2012
    Allowance
amount
December
31, 2011
 
Refinería de Cartagena S.A.   Class action suit – pro-Culture stamp   Lower court – Awaiting decision.   $ 166     $ 591  
Refinería de Cartagena S.A.   Class action suit – Contribution for self-generation of power   Lower court – Beginning evidentiary phase.     154       1,181  
Oleoducto de los Llanos ODL   Administrative investigation before the Superintendence of Corporations   Appeal for reversal of the Resolution issued by the Superintence of Companies, pursuant to which the Company received a sanction for late presentation of Form No. 13 for investments over assigned capital.     3,587       3,587  
Ocensa   Administrative Court proceedings   39 real estate suits before the regular courts, in which Ocensa is an intervening party because it holds the right of way in the fields involved.     8,042       -  
Hocol S.A.   Special appeal in cassation, sole risk San Jacinto, La Hocha Contract   In April the recourse was allowed and the applicant was transferred. Hydrocarbon Services presented the appeal in cassation. In September, the Company presented the respective appeal. It is awaiting decision.     1,500       1,500  
Hocol S.A.   Regular/Labor   Resolved favorably by the Court. The applicant presented an appeal on the grounds that the amount taken into account for the claim did not match the sentence. The Company ordered the main sentence to be paid by the pension fund, in the amount set by the Court; the proceeding is awaiting decision regarding the liquidation of payment.     1,040       1,040  
Hocol S.A.   Regular/Labor   Through which the Court declared that the work accident suffered by claimant Blanco Motta was the fault of the employer, SAN ANTONIO INTERNACIONAL, sentencing the Company to pay full compensation for damages to the applicant and other claimants – family members     1,000       -  
Hocol S.A.   Regular/Labor   Sentence declaring that in the events of the work accident that took place on July 21, 2008, in which Mr. OSWALD ANDRADE SÁNCHEZ lost his life, there was employer culpability on the part of PROFESIONALES TÉCNICOS S.A.S., and declaring the other defendants, HOCOL S.A., HÉCTOR RAMÓN CASTAÑEDA MAYOR and HUGO ARENAS PARRADO joint and severally liable for payment.   $ 643     $ -  

 

F- 47
 

 

(32) Commitments

 

Gas supply contracts

 

In addition to existing contracts, the Company has concluded new gas sale or supply contracts with third parties, such as Gases de Occidente S.A. E.S.P., Empresas Públicas de Medellín E.S.P., and ISAGEN S.A. E.S.P, among others. As of December 2012, the Company had sold an average of 498.48 GBTUD in the amount of $1,539,631 (including exports).

 

Ship or pay contracts

 

Ecopetrol S.A. and ODL Finance S.A. have signed the following ship or pay contracts: (i) the first supports the five-year debt (Financial Tariff) with Grupo Aval, which is collected in trust, from which the debt amortization payments are made. This contract was replaced by a new one, concluded in May 2010, for a seven-year term, to reflect the new terms agreed to with Grupo Aval, and (ii) the second contract backs securitization (autonomous trust securities) for a seven-year term. The securities are administrated from their date of issuance by an autonomous trust structured for that purpose, to which have been ceded the rights for invoicing, collecting and paying the securities holders.

 

Under the first ship or pay contract, ODL Finance S.A. committed to transporting 75,000 barrels of crude a day during the two-year grace period for the facility, and 90,000 barrels of crude a day during the subsequent five years. Under the second contract, ODL Finance S.A. committed to transporting 19,500 barrels of crude during the first phase of the construction period (which began operations in September 2009) and 39,000 barrels of crude a day from the beginning of the second phase, which took place in the first quarter of 2010.

 

Bicentenario ship or pay contract for crude oil transportation

 

In order to finance the construction of Stages 0 and 1 of the Bicentenario oil pipeline, crude oil transportation contacts were signed that create the obligation on the part of the respective shareholder or affiliate to ship crude oil under its ownership: (i) from the Araguaney station to Coveñas, (ii) under the ‘ship or pay’ modality, and (iii) up to the capacity of the shareholder, determined by his share in Bicentenario, which will depend on the contracted capacity of all Bicentenario’s shareholders and/or affiliates, and which shall not be less than 110,000 BPCD.

 

In exchange for the shipping service, the shareholder or his affiliate must pay a fixed monthly fee, even if no barrels at all are shipped, from one of the following dates, whichever comes first: (i) The date at which the oil pipeline begins operation or (ii) 12 months from the date of the first disbursement of the syndicated loan, namely July 5, 2013. The right to receive the fee under the ship or pay modality was ceded to an autonomous trust created for the purpose of administrating and making payments.

 

The contracts will initially be in effect from the date of the first payment of the fee, or the date of the beginning of service, whichever takes place first, and will end either (a) 12 years after the beginning of the period, or (b) the day on which all of the obligations under the contract have been discharged, whichever comes last. Once the above period has been completed, the contract will be in effect for an additional period of 20 years.

 

F- 48
 

 

Guarantee for the Cartagena Refinery expansion and modernization project

 

On December 30, 2011, Ecopetrol S.A. granted a guarantee to Refinería de Cartagena S.A.– Reficar S.A., as part of the financing granted by a group of export credit agencies and commercial banks, for the project to expand and modernize the Cartagena Refinery. The Project Finance financing structure has a maximum repayment period of 14 years, starting six months after the date of completion of the Project.

 

For the purposes of financing the Project, Ecopetrol gave the lenders a contingent guarantee to pay potential amounts that Reficar S.A. may need to service the debt.

 

Hocol’s undertakings toward the Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos (ANH)

 

Hocol has 4 Bank Guarantees and 22 Letters of Credit to guarantee the various undertakings that Hocol has with the ANH, as listed below:

 

No.   Bank   Guarantee   Maturity   Linked to   Required
upon?
  Date at
which
contract
was signed
with the
ANH
  Currency   Pour
Montants
  Beneficiary   Type of
Guarantee
                                         
1   Occidente   288-9846-2009   18/06/2013   CPO-17 Phase I   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   18/12/2008   USD   9,253,000   ANH   BANK GUARANTEE IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
                                         
2   Occidente   288-9861-2009   17/12/2015   Niscota Phase I and II   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   18/09/2006   USD   4,680,000   ANH   BANK GUARANTEE IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
                                         
3   Occidente   288-9889-2009   16/02/2013   VSM-10 Phase I   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   17/02/2009   USD   25,000,000   ANH   BANK GUARANTEE IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
                                         
4   Bogota   917-211-000-342   12/09/2013   Saltarin Phase IV   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   12/04/2007   USD   996,000   ANH   STAND-BY LETTER OF CREDIT IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
                                         
5   Bogota   917-211-000-345   12/01/2013   SSJN-9 Phase I   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   18/12/2008   USD   3,075,235   ANH   STAND-BY LETTER OF CREDIT IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
                                         
6   Bogota   917-211-1000-361   30/07/2013   Saman Phase IV   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   20/06/2006   USD   600,000   ANH   STAND-BY LETTER OF CREDIT IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
                                         
7   Bogota   917-211-1000-374   21/02/2013   Guarrojo – Abandonment of Ocelote Field   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   06/04/2006   USD   2,002,293   ANH   STAND-BY LETTER OF CREDIT IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
                                         
8   Bogota   917-211-1000-391   25/03/2013   Perdices Phase V   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   18/02/2011   USD   600,000   ANH   STAND-BY LETTER OF CREDIT IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
                                         
9   Bogota   917-211-100-392   06/06/2013   Cocli Phase V   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   12/03/2007   USD   348,000   ANH   STAND-BY LETTER OF CREDIT IN FOREIGN CURRENCY

 

F- 49
 

 

No.   Bank   Guarantee   Maturity   Linked to   Required
upon?
  Date at
which
contract
was signed
with the
ANH
  Currency   Pour
Montants
  Beneficiary   Type of
Guarantee
                                         
10   Bogota   917-211-1000-407   23/11/2014   LIa-13 Phase I   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   25/02/2011   USD   300,000   ANH   STAND-BY LETTER OF CREDIT IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
                                         
11   Bogota   917-211-1000-412   27/11/2014   VSM-9 Phase I   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   25/02/2011   USD   300,000   ANH   STAND-BY LETTER OF CREDIT IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
                                         
12   Bogota   917-211-1000-413   27/11/2014   VIM-6 Phase I   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   25/02/2011   USD   2,429,925   ANH   STAND-BY LETTER OF CREDIT IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
                                         
13   Bogota   917-211-1000-414   26/11/2014   CPO-16 Phase I   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   25/02/2011   USD   916,650   ANH   STAND-BY LETTER OF CREDIT IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
                                         
14   Bogota   917-211-1000-475   25/11/2013   LLA-39 Phase I   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   25/02/2011   USD   8,900,000   ANH   STAND-BY LETTER OF CREDIT IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
                                         
15   Citibank   543-560-0176   27/05/2013   LLA-13 Phase I – Exploratory   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   25/02/2011   USD   2,250,000   ANH   LETTER OF CREDIT
                                         
16   Citibank   543-660-0179   26/11/2014   CPO-16 Phase I   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   25/02/2011   USD   4,000,000   ANH   LETTER OF CREDIT
                                         
17   Citibank   543-760-0179   26/11/2014   VSM-9 Phase I   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   25/02/2011   USD   4,800,000   ANH   LETTER OF CREDIT
                                         
18   Citibank   543-560-0179   26/11/2014   VIM-6 Phase I   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   25/02/2011   USD   1,120,000   ANH   LETTER OF CREDIT
                                         
19   Citibank   543-960-0482   24/03/2014   Phase I exploratory program Guarrojo contract   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   27/05/2008   USD   350,000   ANH   LETTER OF CREDIT
                                         
20   Citibank   543-260-0493   18/12/2013   E&P Contract CP017 Phase 2 of the exploratory period   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   18/12/2008   USD   6,000,000   ANH   LETTER OF CREDIT
                                         
21   BBVA   401-0508-2010   08/04/2013   SSJN-I   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   18/12/2008   USD   3,900,020   ANH   LETTER OF CREDIT
                                         
22   BBVA   401-0407-2012   30/07/2014   Exploration contract phase I Saman   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   20/06/2006   USD   600,000   ANH   LETTER OF CREDIT
                                         
23   BBVA   401-110-611   10/09/2014   Clarinero Phase III   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   27/05/2008   USD   576,000   ANH   LETTER OF CREDIT
                                         
24   Bancolombia   250-440-774   25/05/2015   LLA39 Phase I   Breach of undertakings toward ANH   25/02/2011   USD   300,000   ANH   LETTER OF CREDIT

 

F- 50
 

 

No.   Bank   Guarantee   Maturity   Linked to   Required
upon?
  Date at
which
contract
was signed
with the
ANH
  Currency   Pour
Montants
  Beneficiary   Type of
Guarantee
                                         
25   Scotiabank   400000000462   28/02/2013   Natural gas – La Hocha   Breach of contract obligations       USD   12,410   ANH   LETTER OF CREDIT
                                         
26   Banco Bogota   910-721-120-000-584   25/09/2014   Perdices Phase I   Breach of undertakings toward ANH       USD   600,000   ANH   STAND-BY LETTER OF CREDIT IN FOREIGN CURRENCY

 

Ecopetrol del Perú letters of guarantee

 

Article 21 of the Organic Law for Hydrocarbons of Peru requires that:

 

“For all Contracts, each period of the exploration phase must feature a mandatory minimum work program. Each of said programs shall be guaranteed by a bond, the amount of which shall be agreed with the Contracting Party, and which shall be joint and several, unconditional, irrevocable, automatically enforced in Peru, without benefit of discussion, and issued by a Financial System entity that is duly qualified and domiciled in the country.”

 

Pursuant to said Law, Ecopetrol del Perú maintains a series of guarantee letters in effect to guarantee the Company’s undertakings to fulfill the mandatory minimum work programs at the various sup-stages of exploration of the various oil lots provided in the following list:

 

DATE   DESCRIPTION   MAT.
DATE
  ORIGINAL
AMOUNT L.
OF
GUARANTEE
    %
PART
    DOLLARS  
    RESPONSIBILITY LETTER OF GUARANTEE                      
13/04/2010   Renewal of L.G. No. 0011-0586-9800143415-50 (*) License Contract Lot 117   20/09/2013     1,400,000       25 %     350,000  
31/03/2012   Renewal of L.G. No. 0011-0586-9800154116-52 (**) Call for tenders Lot 180   31/01/2013     20,000       50 %     10,000  
31/03/2012   Renewal of L.G. No. 0011-0586-9800154078-54 (**) Call for tenders Lot 182   31/01/2013     20,000       50 %     10,000  
31/03/2012   Renewal of L.G. No. 0011-0586-9811454086-57 (**) Call for tenders Lot 184   31/01/2013     20,000       50 %     10,000  
28/09/2011   Renewal of L.G. No. 0011-0586-9800190422-50 (***) License contract Lot 179   10/01/2013     69,000       100 %     69,000  
01/09/2011   Renewal of Letter of Guarantee No. 10281659-000 License contract Lot 101   15/03/2013     1,521,850       30 %     456,555  

 

Contributions to Cenit (Subsidiary)

 

At its meeting on August 13, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors drafted and unanimously approved the Issuance and Placement Regulation, through which it decided to offer to Ecopetrol S.A. the subscription of 45,582,982 common shares in Cenit’s capital, for a total value of COP$2,279,149; of which COP$11,796 would be a cash contribution, and COP$2,267,353 would be paid by Ecopetrol through the contribution of shares of the shipping companies listed in the following table:

 

    OBC     Ocensa     ODC     ODL     Serviport  
Direct participation of Ecopetrol S.A.     54.8 %     35.3 %     43.8 %     65.0 %     49.0 %
Value of the operation (millions of COP)*   $ 392,837     $ 1,197,702     $ 213,247     $ 456,227     $ 7,339  

 

*Figures from Ecopetrol’s financial statements with the cut-off date of July 31, 2012.

 

This value is made up of the following amounts: COP$455,830 corresponding to the nominal value of the shares and COP$1,823,319 corresponding to the paid-in capital.

 

Similarly, the transfer of Ecopetrol shipping assets is scheduled for January 2013.

 

(33) Subsequent events

 

The management assessed subsequent events up to April 24, 2013, and no significant events were identified as a result of said assessment that would alter the value of assets and liabilities as at December 31, 2012.

 

In accordance with the Public Accounting Regime’s Technical Standards in relation to subsequent events, we indicate that the basic financial statements with the cut-off date of December 31, 2012 were authorized by the legal representative on February 15, 2013.

 

F- 51
 

 

(34) Presentation

 

Certain line items from the financial statements as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 related to the presentation of the consolidated Balance Sheet and the Consolidated Statement of Financial, Economic, Social and Environmental Activities have been reclassified in order to make the presentation of such financial statements comparable to that of the financial statements as of December 31, 2012. The main reclassifications were under cost of sales, marketing and projects, accounts payable and related parties, Taxes, contributions and duties payable, Deposits held in trust and Other assets.

 

F- 52
 

 

35. Differences between Colombian Governmental Entity accounting principles and U.S. GAAP

 

The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Colombian Government Entity GAAP (RCP). These principles and regulations differ in certain significant aspects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and therefore this note presents reconciliations of net income and shareholders’ equity determined under Colombian Government Entity GAAP to those same amounts as determined according to U.S. GAAP. Also presented in this note are those disclosures required under U.S. GAAP but not required under Colombian Government Entity GAAP.

 

A)       Reconciliation of net income attributable to Ecopetrol.:

 

The following table presents the reconciliation of consolidated net income under Colombian Government Entity GAAP to consolidated net income under U.S. GAAP attributable to Ecopetrol for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010:

 

        2012     2011     2010  
                             
    Consolidated net income under Colombian Government Entity GAAP   $ 14,778,947     $ 15,452,334     $ 8,146,471  
i.   Investment securities:                        
    a. Unrealized gain (loss)     (45,199 )     (224 )     63,545  
    b. Impairment     (34,657 )     21,423       (36,818 )
ii.   Investments in non-marketable securities:                        
    a. Equity method     (109,749 )     (27,825 )     (25,063 )
    b. Variable interest entity (VIE)     -       -       (13 )
    c. Impairment     9       13,136       (61,371 )
iii.   Derivatives     (4,709 )     (768 )     (24,736 )
iv.   Exchange of non-monetary assets     -       425,521       23,640  
v.   Deferred charges     493,159       (1,710,944 )     (7,167 )
vi.   Employee benefit plans     (157,893 )     288,616       336,276  
vii.   Provisions and contingencies     141,755       335,983       67,629  
viii.   Assets and liabilities present value     (99,188 )     126,861       -  
ix.   Deferred income taxes     (392,593 )     (647,139 )     (1,159,147 )
x.   Revenue recognition:                        
    a. Cost of sales – over and under deliveries     208,644       (449,225 )     158,609  
    b. Other income     6,100       70,658       (11,685 )
xi.   Inflation adjustment     165,867       289,470       320,374  
xii.   Inventories     (16,699 )     76,126       (87,797 )
xiii.   Lease accounting     (75,203 )     (47,372 )     (36,298 )
xiv.   Property, plant and equipment:                        
    a. Interest     (607,200 )     (122,177 )     (168,527 )
    b. Impairment     (43,609 )     (120,225 )     (157,446 )
    c. Capitalized expenses     17,685       7,472       38,751  
    d. Exchange difference     28,793       (5,769 )     -  
xv.   Depreciation, depletion and amortization     239,571       462,333       702,527  
xvi.   Asset retirement obligations     (117,988 )     (217,430 )     140,959  
xvii.   Equity contributions:                        
    a. Incorporated institutional equity     14,195       29,446       20,281  
    b. Reversal of concession rights contributed as capital     2,725       2,464       81,058  
xviii.   Public offering cost and discount on issuance of shares     -       103,949       -  
xix.   Indebtedness cost     (36 )     (652 )     (1,670 )
xx.   Business combinations:                        
    a. Goodwill     275,271       229,646       172,660  
    b. Fair value adjustments to assets and liabilities acquired     -       89,387       (176,590 )
xxi.   Non-controlling interest     227,514       (7,015 )     (124,394 )
xxii.   Cumulative translation adjustment     (199,863 )     149,147       16,977  
    Consolidated net income under U.S. GAAP attributable to Ecopetrol   $ 14,695,649     $ 14,817,207     $ 8,211,035  

 

F- 53
 

 

B) Reconciliation of shareholders’ equity attributable to Ecopetrol:

 

The following table presents the reconciliation of Ecopetrol shareholders’ equity under Colombian Government Entity GAAP to Ecopetrol shareholders’ equity under U.S. GAAP attributable to Ecopetrol for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

 

        2012     2011  
                 
    Consolidated shareholders’ equity under Colombian Government Entity GAAP   $ 64,740,881     $ 54,688,855  
i.   Investment securities:                
    a. Unrealized gain     1,111,085       1,145,134  
ii.   Investments in non-marketable securities:                
    a. Equity method     (1,616,529 )     (1,578,658 )
    b. Variable interest entity (VIE)     320,587       320,587  
    c. Valuation surplus     (1,144,221 )     (1,179,024 )
    d. Impairment     (53,036 )     (53,045 )
iii.   Derivatives     -       -  
iv.   Exchange of non-monetary assets     1,135,175       1,135,175  
v.   Deferred charges     (1,140,342 )     (1,646,275 )
vi.   Employee benefit plans     (3,229,160 )     (2,985,447 )
vii.   Provisions and contingencies     492,223       350,535  
viii.   Assets and liabilities present value     (708 )     98,600  
ix.   Deferred income taxes     (2,729,013 )     (2,335,269 )
x.   Revenue recognition:                
    a. Cost of sales – over and under deliveries     (177,762 )     (386,427 )
    b. Other income     (1,128 )     (1,128 )
xi.   Inflation adjustment     (3,071,684 )     (3,237,529 )
xii.   Inventories     (55,078 )     (38,473 )
xiii.   Lease accounting     240,726       315,923  
xiv.   Property, plant and equipment:                
    a. Interest     (912,619 )     (314,700 )
    b. Revaluation of property, plant and equipment and public accounting effect     (19,503,673 )     (12,396,858 )
    c. Impairment     (851,991 )     (128,210 )
    d. Capitalized expenses     (525,995 )     (577,734 )
    e. Exchange difference     (129,515 )     (253,782 )
xv.   Depreciation, depletion and amortization     5,402,349       5,152,512  
xvi.   Asset retirement obligations     135,412       253,327  
xvii.   Equity contributions:                
    a. Incorporated institutional equity     (37,499 )     (51,693 )
    b. Reversal of concession rights contributed as capital     (17,013 )     (19,738 )
xviii.   Indebtedness cost     6,443       6,479  
xix.   Business combinations:                
    a. Goodwill     658,346       383,075  
    b. Fair value adjustments to assets and liabilities acquired     (1,405,659 )     (1,405,659 )
xx.   Non-controlling interest     1,184,780       981,572  
xxi.   Cumulative translation adjustment     (1,177,030 )     (186,952 )
    Consolidated Ecopetrol shareholders’ equity under U.S. GAAP   $ 37,648,352     $ 36,055,173  

 

F- 54
 

 

C) Supplemental condensed consolidated financial statements under U.S. GAAP

 

1. Supplemental condensed consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 in conformity with under U.S. GAAP are presented below:

 

    2012     2011  
             
Assets                
Current assets:                
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 7,972,335     $ 7,073,550  
Investments                
Available for sale     1,331,665       909,161  
Held to maturity     5,054       19,002  
Accounts and notes receivable, net     6,076,043       5,474,883  
Inventories     2,670,226       2,696,103  
Prepaid expenses and other assets     359,200       408,195  
Deferred income taxes     1,748,302       1,228,552  
Total current assets     20,162,825       17,809,445  

Long term assets

               
Investments                
   Available for sale     5,595,745       5,476,838  
   Held to maturity     87,988       98,372  
   Equity method     1,014,251       1,037,012  
Accounts and notes receivable, net     514,526       406,944  
Restricted assets     546,246       549,882  
Property, plant and equipment, net     32,997,535       25,604,983  
Natural and environmental resources, net     17,730,899       15,690,887  
Goodwill     1,264,470       1,388,568  
Deferred charges and other assets     1,032,330       1,374,470  
Deferred income taxes     102,284       1,158,314  
Capital lease     470,233       313,364  
Total assets   $ 81,519,332     $ 70,909,079  
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity                
Current liabilities:                
Financial obligations   $ 970,479     $ 837,408  
Accounts payable and related parties     7,233,313       5,043,569  
Capital lease liability     109,000       108,848  
Taxes payable     3,738,483       6,236,515  
Dividends Payable     3,919,102       -  
Labor and pension plan obligations     256,930       233,322  
Estimated liabilities and provisions     1,564,562       1,521,444  
Deferred income tax liability     -       21  
Other short-term liabilities     -       2,370  
Total current liabilities     17,791,869       13,983,497  
Financial obligations, long-term     12,784,167       8,396,125  
Accounts payable, long-term     6,173       140,469  
Capital lease liability     593,144       351,809  
Taxes payable     534,078       1,003,442  
Pension plan obligation and other labor obligations, long-term     7,304,395       6,354,272  
Estimated liabilities and provisions     2,322,280       2,081,776  
Deferred income tax liability     -       144,149  
Other long-term liabilities     100,426       110,248  
Total long term liabilities     23,644,663       18,582,290  
Total liabilities     41,436,532       32,565,787  
Shareholders’ equity of Ecopetrol     37,648,352       36,055,173  
Non-controlling interest     2,434,448       2,288,119  
Total equity     40,082,800       38,343,292  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 81,519,332     $ 70,909,079  

 

F- 55
 

 

2. Supplemental consolidated statements of income

 

The consolidated statements of income of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 in conformity with U.S. GAAP are presented below:

 

    2012     2011     2010  
                   
Revenue:                        
Local sales   $ 24,918,476     $ 23,109,208     $ 18,291,606  
Foreign sales     41,948,661       39,606,607       22,587,718  
Total revenue     66,867,137       62,715,815       40,879,324  
                         
Cost of sales     38,353,685       33,519,507       24,441,962  
Gross income     28,513,452       29,196,308       16,437,362  
                         
Operating expenses:                        
Administration     2,057,796       3,826,298       856,881  
Selling and projects     2,898,693       1,696,223       1,701,967  
Operating income     23,556,963       23,673,787       13,878,514  
                         
Non-operating income, net     (1,143,481 )     (217,102 )     (1,037,793 )
Income before income tax     22,413,482       23,456,685       12,840,721  
                         
Income tax:                        
Current income tax     7,095,874       7,501,002       3,201,040  
Deferred income tax     430,114       898,084       1,196,757  
      7,525,988       8,399,086       4,397,797  
Net income     14,887,494       15,057,599       8,442,924  
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interest     (191,845 )     (240,392 )     (231,889 )
Net Income attributable to Ecopetrol   $ 14,695,649     $ 14,817,207     $ 8,211,035  
Earnings per share (Basic) attributable to Ecopetrol common shareholders   $ 357.41     $ 364.64     $ 202.88  
Weighted-average shares outstanding (Basic)     41,116,698,456       40,634,882,725       40,472,512,588  

 

F- 56
 

 

3. Supplemental consolidated comprehensive income

 

    2012     2011     2010  
                   
Net income   $ 14,887,494     $ 15,057,599     $ 8,442,925  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:                        
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities, net of tax:     18,088       (529,956 )     997,425  
Unrealized actuarial (loss), net of tax     (57,500 )     (990,918 )     (419,661 )
Translation gain (loss) adjustment     (943,192 )     150,424       (313,642 )
Total other comprehensive income     (982,604 )     (1,370,450 )     264,122  
Comprehensive income     13,904,890       13,687,149       8,707,047  
Comprehensive income attributable to the non-controlling interest     (141,999 )     (271,039 )     (232,194 )
Comprehensive income attributable to Ecopetrol   $ 13,762,891       13,416,110     $ 8,474,853  

 

A reconciliation of accumulated other comprehensive income attributable to Ecopetrol, including the related income tax effects, is presented below:

 

    2012  
    Before-Income
Tax Amount
    Income Tax
(Expense)
Benefit
    Net of Income
Tax Amount
 
                   
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale   $ 1,242,990     $ (46,437 )   $ 1,196,553  
Pension liability – net unamortized actuarial gain (loss)     (4,203,835 )     1,387,265       (2,816,570 )
Cumulative translation adjustment     (1,476,022 )     -       (1,476,022 )
Other comprehensive income (loss)   $ (4,436,867 )   $ 1,340,828     $ (3,096,039 )

 

    2011  
    Before-Income
Tax Amount
    Income Tax
(Expense)
Benefit
    Net of Income
Tax Amount
 
                   
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale   $ 1,197,304     $ (18,718 )   $ 1,178,586  
Pension liability - net unamortized actuarial gain (loss)     (4,118,015 )     1,358,945       (2,759,070 )
Cumulative translation adjustment     (582,797 )     -       (582,797 )
Other comprehensive income (loss)   $ (3,503,508 )   $ 1,340,227     $ (2,163,281 )

 

    2010  
    Before-Income
Tax Amount
    Income Tax
(Expense)
Benefit
    Net of Income
Tax Amount
 
                   
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale   $ 1,734,255     $ (25,802 )   $ 1,708,453  
Pension liability – net unamortized actuarial gain (loss)     (2,639,033 )     870,881       (1,768,152 )
Cumulative translation adjustment     (702,485 )     -       (702,485 )
Other comprehensive income (loss)   $ (1,607,263 )   $ 845,079     $ (762,184 )

 

F- 57
 

 

4. Supplemental condensed consolidated statements of cash flows

 

The statements of cash flows of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 under U.S. GAAP are presented below:

 

    2012     2011     2010  
                   
Cash flows provided by operating activities:                        
Net income   $ 14,695,649     $ 14,817,207     $ 8,211,035  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:                        
Non-controlling interest     191,845       240,392       231,889  
Equity method in non-marketable securities     (15,528 )     (545,421 )     25,063  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization     4,977,009       5,109,820       3,608,292  

Accretion Expense

    148,593       133,796       151,516  
Capitalized exploratory well costs charged to expense     278,254       378,959       841,713  
Impairment     276,147       116,154       157,446  
Provisions     431,293       481,191       (141,038 )
Deferred income tax     428,559       898,084       1,196,757  
Exchange gain (loss)     267,125       58,380       (137,054 )
Loss on retirement of property, plant and equipment     64,385       418       42,340  
Losses in retirement of investment in natural and environmental resources     358,599       -       39,668  
Other asset write-offs     -       300       359,981  
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities:                        
Accounts and notes receivable     (1,099,884 )     (2,056,410 )     (22,944 )
Inventories     (423,073 )     (642,888 )     (90,512 )
Deferred charges and other assets     (1,060,411 )     76,208       (520,175 )
Accounts payable and related parties     2,668,864       (235,888 )     1,294,450  
Taxes payable     (2,890,533 )     3,857,834       553,613  
Labor obligations     888,708       631,036       (369,839 )
Estimated liabilities and provisions     (58,268 )     (1,069,585 )     (791,274 )
Bargain purchase gain     -       (89,387 )     -  
Net cash provided by operating activities     20,127,333       22,160,200       14,640,927  
Cash flows from investing activities:                        
Payment for purchase of companies, net of cash acquired     -       (262,009 )     (1,163,131 )
Dividends received     32,541       61,900       30,855  
Purchase of investment securities     (15,281,566 )     (11,685,030 )     (11,808,784 )
Redemption of investment securities     14,458,913       12,019,376       9,952,542  
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment     -       -       4,751  
Investment in natural and environmental resources     (5,872,995 )     (4,637,881 )     (4,601,123 )
Additions to property, plant and equipment     (9,350,074 )     (10,100,158 )     (5,946,298 )
Net cash used in investing activities     (16,013,181 )     (14,603,802 )     (13,351,188 )
Cash flows from financing activities:                        
Return on capital through spin-off     -       -       (325,367 )
Repayment of financial obligations     (1,203,309 )     132,542       (43,677 )
Proceeds from financial obligations     5,995,738       (217,383 )     2,959,345  
Proceeds from issuance of shares     171,582       2,499,062       525  
Cash paid to acquire a non-controlling interest     (1,917 )     (884,946 )     -  
Dividends paid     (8,419,331 )     (5,907,021 )     (3,782,966 )
Net cash used in financing activities     (3,457,237 )     (4,377,746 )     (1,192,140 )
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash     241,870       (15,847 )     155,476  
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents     656,915       3,178,652       (82,401 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year     7,073,550       3,910,745       3,837,670  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year   $ 7,972,335     $ 7,073,550     $ 3,910,745  

 

F- 58
 

 

    2012     2011     2010  
Supplemental cash flows information                        
Cash paid during the year                        
Interest   $ 732,335     $ 509,177     $ 404,708  
Income taxes   $ 8,320,779     $ 3,631,331     $ 982,783  
                         
Non-cash transactions                        
Liabilities assumed in business combinations   $ -     $ 382,456     $ -  
Assets acquired through capital lease contracts   $ 260,648     $ 72,784     $ -  
Increase of natural and environmental resources through asset retirement obligations   $ (156,871 )   $ 655,240     $ 779,913  

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP as in effect for 2007, some deposits with banks were considered as short-term investments since they produced yields and the Company has defined them to be used for specific purposes. Under U.S. GAAP, these deposits are considered cash and are valued at fair value. The amounts reclassified as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $487,922 and $183,967. There were not any amount reclassified as of December 31, 2012.

 

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year’s cash flow financial statement to conform to current year presentation.

 

F- 59
 

 

5. Supplemental consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity.

 

The statements of shareholders’ equity of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 under U.S. GAAP as follows:

 

    Common Stock                                            
    Millions
of
shares
    Value     Additional
paid-
in-capital
    Comprehensive
Income
    Retained
earnings
    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
income (loss)
    Ecopetrol’s
Equity
    Non-
Controlling
Interest
    Total Equity  
Balance at December 31, 2009     40,473       10,117,791       4,044,669               9,247,252       (1,026,001 )     22,383,712       634,718       23,018,430  
Acquired non-controlling interest     -       -       (804 )     -       -       -       (804 )     804       -  
Other non-controlling interest     -       -       -       -       -       -       -       4,444       4,444  
Issuance of Company shares     -       337       188       -       -       -       525       -       525  
Distribution of dividends     -       -       -       -       (3,682,998 )     -       (3,682,998 )     (418,558 )     (4,101,556 )
Return of capital due to a spin-off     -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (144,251 )     (144,251 )
Comprehensive income:     -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -  
Net income     -       -       -     $ 8,442,925       8,211,035       -       8,211,035       231,889       8,442,925  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:                                                                        
Unrealized earnings on investment securities, net of tax effect of $8,819     -       -       -       997,425       -       -       997,425       -       997,425  
Actuarial (loss), net of tax effect of $206,699     -       -       -       (419,661 )     -       -       (419,661 )     -       (419,661 )
Translation adjustment     -       -       -       (313,642 )     -       -       (313,947 )     305       (313,642 )
Total other comprehensive income     -       -       -       264,122       -       263,817       -       -       -  
Comprehensive income     -       -       -     $ 8,707,047       -       -       -       -       -  
Balance at December 31, 2010     40,473     $ 10,118,128     $ 4,044,053             $ 13,775,291     $ (762,184 )   $ 27,175,285     $ 309,351     $ 27,484,636  
Business combination     -       -       -       -       -       -       -       1,425,702       1,425,702  
Acquired non-controlling interest     -       -       (792,440 )     -       -       -       (792,440 )     (92,506 )     (884,946 )
Issuance of shares     644       161,047       1,963,687       -       -       -       2,124,734       374,328       2,499,062  
Distribution of dividends     -       -       -       -       (5,868,515 )     -       (5,868,515 )     -       (5,868,515 )
Comprehensive income:                                                                        
Net income     -       -             $ 15,057,599       14,817,207       -       14,817,207       240,392       15,057,599  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:                                                                        
Unrealized earnings on investment securities, net of tax effect of $7,086     -       -       -       (529,751 )     -       -       (529,867 )     116       (529,751 )
Actuarial (loss), net of tax effect of $488,064     -       -       -       (990,918 )     -       -       (990,918 )     -       (990,918 )
Translation adjustment     -       -       -     $ 150,424       -       -       119,688       30,736       150,424  
Total other comprehensive income     -       -       -       (1,370,245 )     -       (1,401,097 )     -       -       -  
Comprehensive income     -       -       -     $ 13,687,354       -       -       -       -       -  
Balance at December 31, 2011   $ 41,117     $ 10,279,175     $ 5,215,300             $ 22,723,983     $ (2,163,281 )   $ 36,055,173     $ 2,288,119     $ 38,343,292  
Acquired non-controlling interest     -       -       -       -       (689 )     -       (689 )     (1,125 )     (1,814 )
Other non-controlling interest     -       -       -       -       (103 )     -       (103 )     -       (103 )
Spin-off                                                             (37 )     (37 )
Issuance of Company shares     -       -       166,090       -       -       -       166,090       5,492       171,582  
Distribution of dividends     -       -       -       -       (12,335,009 )     -       (12,335,009 )     -       (12,335,009 )
Return of capital due to a spin-off     -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -  
Comprehensive income:     -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -  
Net income     -       -       -     $ 14,887,494       14,695,648       -       14,695,648       191,845       14,887,493  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:     -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -  
Unrealized earnings on investment securities, net of tax effect of $(27,734)     -       -       -       18,088       -       -       17,967       121       18,088  
Actuarial (loss), net of tax effect of $27,522     -       -       -       (57,500 )     -       -       (57,500 )     -       (57,500 )
Translation adjustment     -       -       -       (943,192 )     -       -       (893,225 )     (49,967 )     (943,192 )
Total other comprehensive income     -       -       -     $ (982,604 )     -       (932,758 )     -       -       -  
Comprehensive income     -       -       -     $ 13,904,890       -       -       -       -       -  
Balance at December 31, 2012   $ 41,117     $ 10,279,175     $ 5,381,390             $ 25,083,830     $ (3,096,039 )   $ 37,648,352     $ 2,434,448     $ 40,082,800  

 

F- 60
 

 

D) Summary of significant differences between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP and required U.S. GAAP disclosures

 

i. INVESTMENT SECURITIES

 

The Company’s investments include both marketable and non-marketable securities. Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP , the Company classifies investment securities based on the form of their investment return, either as fixed-yield investment or as variable-yield investments. Fixed-yield investments generally represent debt securities and are initially recorded at cost with subsequent adjustments to fair value recorded in the income statement. Variable-yield investments generally represent equity securities or interests in other entities and are initially recorded at cost. Subsequent adjustments to fair value are made with increases in fair value resulting in an increase to equity, while decreases in fair value are charged to the income statement. Fair values are determined using quoted market prices, if and when available. In the absence of quoted market prices, these investments are recorded at Management’s estimate of fair value using discounted cash flow techniques.

 

Under U.S. GAAP, the Company has classified its investment securities as held to maturity or available for sale, as defined in ASC Sub-topic 320-10-25, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Debt security investments for which the Company has demonstrated its ability and intent to hold until maturity are classified as held-to-maturity. Such investments are reported at amortized cost. Investments classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported, net of taxes, as a component of other comprehensive income.

 

In the event that any other than temporary impairment of the investments value occurs, the impairment loss is recorded in income.

 

The Company’s short-term and long-term investments at December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 consist of the following:

 

As of December 31, 2012   Aggregated
Fair
Value
    Gross
Unrealized
Holding Gains
    Gross Unrealized
Holding Losses
    Gross
Recognized
Losses
    Cost
Basis
 
Short-term Investments – available for sale securities:                                        
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government   $ 844,764     $ 29,365     $ (41 )   $ (27,899 )   $ 843,338  
Securities issued or secured by government sponsored enterprise (GSEs)     92,536       -       (57 )     -       92,594  
Securities issued or secured by financial entities     197,933       989       (5 )     (734 )     197,683  
Other debt securities     196,432       1,000       (90 )     (967 )     196,490  
Total short-term investments classified as available for sale     1,331,665       31,354       (193 )     (29,600 )     1,330,105  
Long-term investments – available for sale securities:                                        
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government     2,156,611       59,719       (1,059 )     (17,363 )     2,115,315  
Securities issued or secured by government sponsored enterprise (GSEs)     1,545,377       3,466       (401 )     (2,865 )     1,545,178  
Securities issued or secured by financial entities     18,112       362       -       (309 )     18,059  
Securities issued or secured by the U.S government     44,265       18       -       -       44,247  
Other debt securities     464,202       5,103       (283 )     (2,466 )     461,847  
Securities issued by mixed- economy governmental entities     1,367,178       1,106,181       -       -       260,998  
Total long-term investments classified as available for sale     5,595,745       1,174,849       (1,743 )     (23,003 )     4,445,644  
Total available for sale   $ 6,927,410     $ 1,206,203     $ (1,936 )   $ (52,603 )   $ 5,775,749  
                                         
    Aggregated Fair
Value
    Gross Unrealized
Holding Gains
    Gross Unrealized
Holding Losses
    Net Carrying
Amount
         
Short-term investments – held to maturity securities:                                        
Other debt securities   $ 2,411     $ -     $ (2,642 )   $ 5,054          
Total short-term investments classified as held to maturity     2,411       -       (2,642 )     5,054          
Long-term investments- held to maturity securities:                                        
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government     96,791       8,803       -       87,988          
Total long-term investments classified as held to maturity     96,791       8,803       -       87,988          
Total held to maturity   $ 99,202     $ 8,803     $ (2,642 )   $ 93,042          

 

F- 61
 

 

As of December 31, 2011   Aggregated
Fair Value
    Gross Unrealized
Holding Gains
    Gross
Unrealized
Holding Losses
    Gross
Recognized
Losses
    Cost Basis  
Short-term investments – available for sale securities:                                        
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government   $ 496,184     $ 17,151     $ (279 )   $ (10,257 )   $ 489,569  
Securities issued or secured by government sponsored enterprise (GSEs)     48,672       270       -       -       48,402  
Securities issued or secured by financial entities     293,111       1,613       (36 )     (1,430 )     292,964  
Other debt securities     71,194       338       (10 )     (136 )     71,002  
Total short-term investments classified as available for sale     909,161       19,372       (325 )     (11,823 )     901,937  
Long-term investments – available for sale securities:                                        
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government     806,961       22,083       (9,075 )     (9,397 )     803,350  
Securities issued or secured by government sponsored enterprise (GSEs)     2,100,055       7,422       (1,374 )     (56 )     2,094,063  
Securities issued or secured by financial entities     259,745       100       (1,818 )     -       261,463  
Securities issued or secured by the U.S government     700,237       503       (16 )     (60 )     699,810  
Other debt securities     208,334       631       (153 )     -       207,856  
Securities issued by mixed- economy governmental entities     1,401,506       1,140,507       -       -       260,999  
Total long-term investments classified as available for sale     5,476,838       1,171,246       (12,436 )     (9,513 )     4,327,541  
Total available for sale   $ 6,385,999     $ 1,190,618     $ (12,761 )   $ (21,336 )   $ 5,229,478  
                                         
    Aggregated Fair
Value
    Gross Unrealized
Holding Gains
    Gross
Unrealized
Holding Losses
    Net Carrying
Amount
         
Short-term investments – held to maturity securities:                                        
Other debt securities   $ 3,477     $ -     $ (3,322 )   $ 6,798          
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government     12,285       81       -       12,204          
Total short-term investments classified as held to maturity     15,762       81       (3,322 )     19,002          
                                         
Long-term investments- held to maturity securities:                                        
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government     109,629       11,257       -       98,372          
Total long-term investments classified as held to maturity     109,629       11,257       -       98,372          
Total held to maturity   $ 125,391     $ 11,338     $ (3,322 )   $ 117,374          

 

As of December 31, 2010   Aggregated
Fair Value
    Gross Unrealized
Holding Gains
    Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
    Gross
Recognized
Losses
    Cost Basis  
Short-term investments – available for sale securities:                                        
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government   $ 19,527     $ 255     $ -     $ -     $ 19,272  
Securities issued or secured by financial entities     39,408       -       (1,338 )     (156 )     40,902  
Total short-term investments classified as available for sale     58,935       255       (1,338 )     (156 )     60,174  
Long-term investments – available for sale securities:                                        
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government     1,622,809       35,723       (5,546 )     (19,654 )     1,612,286  
Securities issued or secured by government sponsored enterprise (GSEs)     1,498,957       33,141       (1,021 )     (21,382 )     1,488,219  
Securities issued or secured by financial entities     80,636       201       (458 )     (1,430 )     82,323  
Securities issued or secured by the U.S government     642,974       9,061       (1,924 )     -       635,837  
Other debt securities     29,585       459       -       (136 )     29,262  
Securities issued by mixed-economy governmental entities     1,932,115       1,656,071       -       -       276,044  
Total long-term investments classified as available for sale     5,807,076       1,734,656       (8,949 )     (42,602 )     4,123,971  
Total available for sale   $ 5,866,011     $ 1,734,911     $ (10,287 )   $ (42,758 )   $ 4,184,145  
                                         
    Aggregated Fair
Value
    Gross Unrealized
Holding Gains
    Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
    Net Carrying
Amount
         
Short-term investments – held to maturity securities:                                        
Other debt securities   $ 7,700     $ -     $ -     $ 7,700          
Securities issued or secured by the U.S government     9,867       199       -       9,669          
Total short-term investments classified as held to maturity     17,567       199       -       17,369          
                                         
Long-term investments-held to maturity securities:                                        
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government     120,322       9,567       -       110,755          
Total long-term investments classified as held to maturity     120,322       9,567       -       110,755          
Total held to maturity   $ 137,889     $ 9,766     $ -     $ 128,124          

 

F- 62
 

 

The maturities of fixed-income investments as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

 

As of December 31, 2012
    Available for Sale     Held to Maturity  
    Cost Basis     Fair Value     Cost Basis     Fair Value  
                         
Due in one year or less   $ 1,330,105     $ 1,331,665     $ 5,054     $ 2,411  
Due in one to five years     4,070,503       5,205,708       87,988       96,791  
Due in five to ten years     375,141       390,037       -       -  
Total   $ 5,775,749     $ 6,927,410     $ 93,042     $ 99,202  

 

As of December 31, 2011
    Available for Sale     Held to Maturity  
    Cost Basis     Fair Value     Cost Basis     Fair Value  
                         
Due in one year or less   $ 901,937     $ 909,161     $ 19,002     $ 15,762  
Due in one to five years     3,961,965       3,974,007       98,372       109,629  
Due in five to ten years     365,576       1,502,831       -       -  
Total   $ 5,229,478     $ 6,385,999     $ 117,374     $ 125,391  

 

Amounts recorded in other comprehensive income in prior years realized on securities available for sale sold at December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were:

 

    2012     2011     2010  
                   
Losses   $ 2,004     $ 5,837     $ 67,225  
Gains   $ 33,955     $ 41,331     $ 24,322  

 

Foreign exchange gains and losses on securities available for sale

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, changes in account balances resulting from variations in foreign currency exchange rates are reflected in the Company’s net income. Under U.S. GAAP, any change in value of available-for-sale debt securities as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange rates is reflected in equity as required under the guidance in ASC subtopic 320-10-35. The amount reclassified from earnings under Colombian Government Entity GAAP purposes to other comprehensive income for U.S. GAAP purposes includes $(112,060), $197,664 and $18,931 in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively that correspond to exchange rate differences.

 

Unrealized loss

 

Available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

 

As of December 31, 2012
    Less than 12 months     12 Months or Greater     Total  
Descriptions of Securities   Fair Value     Unrealized
Losses
    Fair Value     Unrealized
Losses
    Fair Value     Unrealized
Losses
 
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government   $ 33,317     $ 41     $ 262,014     $ 1,059     $ 295,331     $ 1,100  
Securities issued or secured by financial entities     11,273       5       -       -       11,273       5  
Securities issued or secured by government sponsored enterprise (GSEs)     92,536       57       942,131       401       1,034,667       459  
Securities issued or secured by the U.S. government     -       -       -       -       -       -  
Other debt securities     71,320       90       80,368       283       151,688       372  
Total   $ 208,446     $ 193     $ 1,284,513     $ 1,743     $ 1,492,959     $ 1,936  

 

As of December 31, 2011
    Less than 12 months     12 Months or Greater     Total  
Descriptions of Securities   Fair Value     Unrealized
Losses
    Fair Value     Unrealized
Losses
    Fair Value     Unrealized
Losses
 
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government   $ 248,874     $ 279     $ 171,756     $ 9,075     $ 420,630     $ 9,354  
Securities issued or secured by financial entities     84,860       36       241,208       1,818       326,068       1,854  
Securities issued or secured by government sponsored enterprise (GSEs)     -       -       757,494       1,374       757,494       1,374  
Securities issued or secured by the U.S. government     -       -       48,759       16       48,759       16  
Other debt securities     30,488       10       89,532       153       120,020       163  
Total   $ 364,222     $ 325     $ 1,308,749     $ 12,436     $ 1,672,971     $ 12,761  

 

F- 63
 

 

Restricted Assets

 

Under U.S. GAAP the Company classifies as restricted assets, those assets where their availability depends on a court decision, such as cash, trust funds or investments. The detail of restricted assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

 

Concept   2012     2011  
Investment securities   $ 448,705     $ 423,020  
Specific destination funds     79,497       78,515  
Cash     50,483       48,347  
Total   $ 578,685     $ 549,882  

 

The most significant restricted asset is related to Santiago de las Atalayas Fund which is detailed in the chart below:

 

Concept   2012     2011  
Investments available for sale   $ 424,213     $ 415,722  
Specific destination funds *     163       1,999  
Cash     124       597  
Total   $ 424,500     $ 418,318  

 

*This fund receives the coupons and principal payments of Santiago de las Atalayas investments in U.S. dollars.

 

The investments related to Santiago de las Atalayas at December 31, 2012 and 2011 consist of the following:

 

As of December 31, 2012   Aggregated
Fair Value
    Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Gains
    Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
    Gross
Recognized
Losses
    Cost Basis  
Short-term Investments – available for sale securities:                                        
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government   $ 30,297     $ 6,903     $ (6 )   $ (6,896 )   $ 30,296  
Total Short-term Investments classified as available for sale     30,297       6,903       (6 )     (6,896 )     30,296  
Long-term Investments – available for sale securities:                                        
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government     378,819       31,759       (7 )     (6,555 )     353,622  
Other debt securities     15,098       106       -       -       14,992  
Total Long-term Investments classified as available for sale   $ 393,917     $ 31,865     $ (7 )   $ (6,555 )   $ 368,614  
Total Available for Sale   $ 424,214     $ 38,768     $ (13 )   $ (13,451 )   $ 398,910  

 

As of December 31, 2011   Aggregated
Fair Value
    Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Gains
    Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
    Gross
Recognized
Losses
    Cost Basis  
Long-term investments - available for sale securities:                                        
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government     415,722       19,656       (300 )     (10,062 )     406,427  
Total long-term investments classified as available for sale   $ 415,722     $ 19,656     $ (300 )   $ (10,062 )   $ 406,427  

 

The unrealized gains and losses of the restricted assets are recognized in other comprehensive income

 

a. Impairment

 

Impairment of investment securities are reported differently under Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP. Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, impairment is charged to income in the current period, but recoveries in value can be recorded up to the amount that was originally impaired. Under U.S. GAAP, other-than-temporary impairment should be charged to income in the current period and a new cost basis for the security is established. Subsequent increases in the cost basis of an impaired investment as a result of a recovery in fair value are included in other comprehensive income.

 

The Company has a policy under which they conduct periodic reviews of marketable securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists. A number of factors are considered in performing an impairment analysis of securities. Those factors include:

 

a) The length of time and the extent to which the market value of the security has been less than cost;

 

b) The financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which influence the operations of the issuer (such as changes in technology that may impair the earnings potential of the investment, or the discontinuance of a segment of a business that may affect the future earnings potential); and

 

F- 64
 

 

c) Carry out the analysis as instructed in ASC paragraph 320-10-65-1 which includes the comparison of the fair value and the amortized cost, evaluates the intention to sell the security and if it is more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell the security prior to recovery, including the existence of a credit loss.

 

The Company also takes into account changes in global and regional economic conditions and changes related to specific issuers or industries that could adversely affect these values.

 

Ecopetrol’s marketable security portfolio consists only of debt securities, such as treasury investments, bonds, and commercial papers. For this reason, the Company has an internal policy to limit the ratings of their investments and issuers to the following ratings:

 

Credit Rating Agency   Short – Term
Credit Rating
  Long – Term
Credit Rating
 
Standard & Poor’s   A-1   A  
Moody’s Investors Services   P-1   A2  
Fitch Ratings   F-1   A  

 

The Company recognized impairment on its investment securities amounting to $50,126, $116 and $44,851 in 2012, 2011 and 2010 respectively.

 

ii. INVESTMENTS IN NON-MARKETABLE SECURITIES

 

a. Equity Method and Valuation Surplus

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP , equity securities for which prices are unquoted, or for which trading volume is minimal, and the Company does not control the investee, are accounted for under the cost method and subsequently are valued by the shareholders' equity comparison method. Under the equity comparison method, the Company accounts for the difference between its proportionate share of shareholders' equity of the investee and its acquisition cost, adjusted for inflation through 2001, in a separate valuation account in the assets and equity (valuation surplus), if the proportionate share of shareholders’ equity of the investee is higher than its cost or as an allowance for losses, affecting net income, if the cost is higher than the proportionate share of shareholders’ equity of the investee. The proportionate share of shareholder’s equity is considered as the market value for this purpose and is known as book value. Under this method, the Company only records dividends as income when received. From 2008 the Colombian Government Entity GAAP incorporated the concept of significant influence for the recognition of investments in associated entities and established the equity method to update these investments.

 

Under U.S. GAAP, an investment in a non-marketable equity security is recorded using the equity method when the investor can exercise significant influence over the investee, or the cost method when significant influence cannot be exercised. Under the equity method of accounting for U.S. GAAP the carrying value of such an investment is adjusted to reflect (1) the Company’s proportionate share of earnings or losses from the investee and (2) additional investments and distributions of dividends. The Company’s proportionate share of income or loss is reported in earnings but any dividends or additional investments are reported only as an adjustment of the carrying amount of the investment.

 

The differences between the application of the cost and the equity method under U.S. GAAP were:

 

· Reversal of valuations and allowances for losses recorded under Colombian Government Entity GAAP
· Reversal of inflation adjustments recorded under Colombian Government Entity GAAP
· Reversal of Goodwill amortization and impairment
· Inclusion of share of earnings or losses under U.S. GAAP, net of inter-company eliminations.
· Inclusion of share in Other Comprehensive Income under U.S. GAAP.
· Recognition of impairment under U.S. GAAP

 

F- 65
 

 

The summary of the investments valued by the equity method for U.S. GAAP purposes is shown in the following table:

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2012

Company   Percentage of
Voting
Interest
    Equity
Calculated
under
U.S. GAAP
    Equity
Under
Colombian
GAAP
    Assets
Under
Colombian
GAAP
    Liabilities
Under
Colombian
GAAP
    Net Income
(Loss) Under
Colombian
GAAP
    Investment
Under U.S.
GAAP
Equity
Method
    Equity
Method
Accounting
Adj (*)
    Total
Equity
Method
Investment
 
                                                       
Invercolsa S.A.     43.35 %   $ 208,648     $ 554,914     $ 571,945     $ 17,031     $ 82,570     $ 90,449     $ -     $ 90,449  
Serviport S.A.     49.00 %     6,660       14,679       47,919       33,240       2,181       3,263       -       3,263  
Offshore International Group     50.00 %     914,845       914,845       1,794,451       879,606       122,287       457,422       433,516       890,938  
Ecodiesel S.A.     50.00 %     30,938       38,817       129,258       90,441       17,455       15,469       -       15,469  
Sociedad Portuaria de Olefinas     50.00 %     452       878       1,224       346       112       226       -       226  
Transgas de Occidente S.A.     20.00 %     127,912       206,382       356,244       149,862       7,285       25,582       (11,676 )     13,906  
                                                    $ 592,411     $ 421,840     $ 1,014,251  

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2011

Company   Percentage of
Voting
Interest
    Equity
Calculated
under
U.S. GAAP
    Equity
Under
Colombian
GAAP
    Assets
Under
Colombian
GAAP
    Liabilities
Under
Colombian
GAAP
    Net Income
(Loss) Under
Colombian
GAAP
    Investment
Under U.S.
GAAP
Equity
Method
    Equity
Method
Accounting
Adj (*)
    Total
Equity
Method
Investment
 
                                                       
Invercolsa S.A.     43.35 %   $ 226,891     $ 536,924     $ 537,332     $ 408     $ 89,713     $ 98,357     $ -     $ 98,357  
Serviport S.A.     49.00 %     2,503       10,469       50,005       39,536       (750 )     1,226       -       1,226  
Offshore International Group     50.00 %     882,435       882,435       1,807,581       925,145       157,644       441,218       476,596       917,814  
Ecodiesel S.A.     50.00 %     15,889       21,362       138,170       116,808       -       7,944       -       7,944  
Sociedad Portuaria de Olefinas     50.00 %     420       772       1,042       270       8       210       -       210  
Transgas de Occidente S.A.     20.00 %     121,455       209,114       415,669       206,555       20,007       24,291       (12,828 )     11,463  
                                                    $ 573,246     $ 463,768     $ 1,037,014  

 

(*) Represents the purchase price allocation adjustments 

 

Concept   2012     2011  
Fair value of property, plant and equipment   $ (8,847 )   $ (9,414 )
Goodwill     430,687       473,182  
Total   $ 421,840     $ 463,768  

 

The number of shares which the Company owns with respect to its investment in Invercolsa S.A. has been subject to a legal dispute with another Invercolsa shareholder. Lower court decisions had ruled in favor of both the Company and the other shareholder and a final court decision in January 2011 determined that 324 million shares, equivalent to 11.58% of the capital stock of Invercolsa should be returned to Ecopetrol. As a result Ecopetrol controls 43.35%. The dividends paid in respect of the shares returned to Ecopetrol are still in dispute, as well as the ownership of shares constituting 8.53% of Invercolsa. The resolution of these matters is still pending.

 

b. Impairment

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP it is not mandatory to perform impairment tests of the Equity Method Investments unless positive evidence is identified. For the years 2011, the investment in Offshore International Group was evaluated for impairment resulting in a loss of $13,136.

 

The impairment under U.S. GAAP ASC paragraph 325-20-35 1A and 2, assets held at cost, including non-marketable equity investments, should be evaluated for impairment if the Company is aware of any events or changes in circumstances that may have significant adverse effects on the fair value of the investment. If the Company believes such circumstances exist, the Company would estimate the asset’s fair value and compare that to the cost to determine if any impairment is necessary. During 2012 and 2011 the Company eventhough it was not aware of any event that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment, calculate the fair value of these investments and concluded that there were not impaired

 

c. Variable Interest Entity (VIE)

 

Under U.S. GAAP, ASC paragraph 810-10-15-13 requires that consolidated financial statements include subsidiaries in which the Company has a controlling financial interest, i.e., a majority voting interest. However, application of the majority voting interest requirement to certain types of entities may not identify the party with a controlling financial interest because that interest may be achieved through other arrangements. Thus, the U.S. GAAP rules also require a Company to consolidate a variable interest entity if that Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE, with that has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly affect the entity’s economic performance and will absorb a majority of the entity’s expected losses, receive a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both. In determining whether it is a primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, a Company shall treat variable interests in that same entity held by the Company’s related parties as its own interest. Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, consolidated financial statements only include subsidiaries in which the Company has the majority voting interest.

 

F- 66
 

 

In October 2009, the subsidiary Oleoducto de los Llanos Orientales (hereinafter “ODL”) assigned its rights under a "Ship or Pay” contract for the completion of a securitization for the purpose of obtaining the funds required to finish the second phase of the project, the refund of capital to the associates, and maintain the capital structure initially agreed. The structure of this issuance was made through assets in a trust fund (hereinafter “Fideicomiso P.A. ODL - ECOPETROL”) administered by Corficolombiana S.A., who has to pay the security holder on the due dates. Additionally, each month, the trust Company must report to ODL income and expenses that are generated in this process and that are paid, if applicable, to ODL as advances.

 

Based on the ASC 810, ODL determined that it must consolidate Fideicomiso P.A. ODL - ECOPETROL, since it is a VIE and ODL is the primary beneficiary and therefore, consolidated its financial statements for U.S. GAAP purposes.

The adjustments of Fideicomiso P. A. ODL – ECOPETROL, according to financial information under U.S. GAAP as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, are as follows:

 

    2012     2011  
             
Assets   $ (92,103 )   $ 6,580  
Liabilities     92,090       (6,593 )
Equity   $ (13 )   $ (13 )
Net income   $ -     $ -  

 

The financial information summary of Fideicomiso P. A. ODL - ECOPETROL according to U.S. GAAP as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, are as follows: 

 

    2012     2011  
             
Assets   $ 539,506     $ 530,969  
Liabilities     (411,722 )     (510,405 )
Equity   $ 127,784     $ 20,564  
Net income   $ 109,204     $ 8,336  

 

iii. DERIVATIVES

 

Ecopetrol is exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rate risk of its financial obligations and to commodity price risk, resulting from the fluctuations of international crude oil prices which affect its earnings, cash flows and financial condition. Ecopetrol manages its exposure to these market risks through its regular operating and financial activities and, when appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. Ecopetrol has established a control to assess, approve and monitor derivative financial instrument activities. Ecopetrol does not buy, hold or sell derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. Ecopetrol's primary foreign currency exposures relate to the U.S. dollar; however, Ecopetrol manages its foreign currency risk position internally, using non-deliverable forwards, according to the size of the mismatches between its asset-liability position in U.S. dollars and its asset-liability position in Colombian pesos. If no mismatches occur Ecopetrol has a perfect natural hedge. Ecopetrol also utilizes other derivative agreements to mitigate changes in the fair value of commodities. None of the derivatives were designated or documented for hedge accounting.

 

The Company periodically enters into call and put option contracts to cover the price risk associated with fluctuations in market prices of asphalt. The option contracts limit the unfavorable effect that the price increase will have on asphalt. The maximum term over which the Company is managing its exposure to the variability for commodity price risk is 12 months.

 

As of December 31, 2012, only the subsidiary Hocol S.A. is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations. Such exposures arise primarily from expenditures that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. The Company constantly monitors its exposure to foreign currency risks. To reduce its foreign currency exposure associated with operating expenses incurred in Colombian pesos, the Company may enter into foreign currency derivatives to manage such risks. These derivatives are recognized at their fair value as either a financial asset or obligation with the corresponding income or expense recognized.

 

Total results recognized related to derivative activities during the years are as follows:

 

    2012     2011     2010  
    Realized     Unrealized     Realized     Unrealized     Realized     Unrealized  
Options (1)   $ 4,315     $ 4,619     $ (199,402 )   $ (2,370 )   $ (13,175 )   $ (1,474 )
Swaps     -       -       (613,387 )     -       (7,031 )     2,242  
Forwards     695       -       2,549       14       245       107  
Total   $ 5,010     $ 4,619     $ (810,240 )   $ (2,356 )   $ (19,961 )   $ 875  

 

  (1) Amounts include premiums paid

 

F- 67
 

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, each derivative has its own accounting treatment depending on the type of derivative. Option premiums paid are recorded as deferred charges and amortized to the income statement as financial expense on a straight-line basis over the life of the contract, the option contract is recognized in memo accounts unless it is likely to be exercised, and the gain is recognized as an investment. Swap and forward contract net results are recorded as an investment. In all cases, gains and losses are recognized in earnings as financial income or expense. Amounts receivable or payable upon maturity resulting from net payments are recorded using current rates for the period.

 

U.S. GAAP requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings. The fair value of derivatives instruments is recorded as other assets and other liabilities.

 

Under U.S. GAAP, embedded derivative instruments shall be separated from the host contract, and accounted for using different measurement attributes, if certain conditions are met. In the case of the Company, some contracts to which the Company is counterparty include embedded foreign exchange derivatives. According to ASC paragraph 815-15-15-10 through 13 these contracts do not require separate accounting for the embedded derivative and the host contract because contract payments are made in the functional currency of a party to the contract or contract payments are made in a currency in which the price of the good or service delivered is routinely denominated in international commerce. In other cases, contracts indexed to inflation considered clearly and closely related.

 

Gas imbalance agreements were evaluated to identify if they were derivatives. Management concluded that these agreements are not derivatives since they do not contain fixed notional amounts.

 

iv. EXCHANGE OF NON-MONETARY ASSETS

 

During 2007, the Company exchanged a refinery business with a book value of $234,371 for a 49% interest in Refinería de Cartagena S.A. The Company estimated the fair value of the 49% investment as $1,369,546. Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, this difference between the cost of the assets given and the fair value of the assets received was recorded as an increase to asset revaluation and equity. However, under ASC Subtopic 845-10-30, 51% of the difference between the book value of the Refinery and the fair value of the assets received, which the Company determined to be a more reliable indicator of the value of the exchange since the fair value of the investment was greater, was recorded in the results of operations as a gain in the amount of $578,939. The remaining 49% of unrealized gain was recorded as a deferred gain with a corresponding increase to the investment, equivalent to a deferred gain of $556,236, to be amortized over the expected useful life of the equipment. In 2011, the Company determined that in 2009, as a result of the acquisition of 51% of the remaining participation in Reficar S.A., the unamortized unrealized gain should have been recorded at fair value since the Company obtained control of Refinería de Cartagena S.A. in 2009 in line with the acquired entity’s fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired as of May 27, 2009. However, according to ASC 250 and SAB 108, we do not consider such amount significant and decided to fully amortize the remaining balance as of 2011. As a result, the net income reconciliation includes amortized income of $425,521 in 2011 and $23,640 in 2010, corresponding to the amortization of the deferred gain.

 

v. DEFERRED CHARGES

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, the Equity Tax is recognized as a deferred charge for the total amount due payable during the years 2011 through 2014. The deferred charge is amortized as an expense of the year based on the payments made. The local regulatory entities also allowed companies that applied inflation adjustments and still have outstanding balances in the Equity Revaluation account to reduce such balance instead of recognizing a deferred charge. Other deferred assets recognized under Colombian Government Entity GAAP are related to certain pre-operating expenses and other charges that include normal recurring maintenance and fees.

 

For U.S. GAAP purposes, the amount of the adjustment in the Company’s net income related to deferred charges amounting to $493,159 in 2012, $1,710,944 in 2011 and $7,167 in 2010.

 

vi. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, the Company estimates the net present value of its actuarial liability for all pension plans and other post-retirement obligations. Annually, the Company estimates the net present value of the actuarial liability and adjusts the recorded liability accordingly. The amount of the adjustment is reflected in the Company’s net income.

 

For other post-retirement benefits, the payments are made according to seniority and the salary at the time of retirement, as stipulated in the Collective Labor Agreement and Agreement No. 01.

 

Under the post-retirement benefits plan for Ecopetrol personnel, the Company covers 90% of educational expenses for children of employees, including enrollment fees, tuition and other associated costs. A fixed annual sum, depending on grade level, is also provided for the acquisition of textbooks. Educational coverage includes kindergarten, elementary school, high school and college. Ecopetrol´s financial statements must also show the cost of post-retirement educational benefits for children of retired employees, since benefits continue irrespective of retirement or death.

 

F- 68
 

 

According to the Collective Labor Agreement and Agreement No. 01, the Company will pay for health services for employees and enrolled family members. Health services include: office visits and required laboratory services, drugs, diagnostic examinations, ambulatory treatment, hospitalization due to illness or accident, surgery due to illness or accident, maternity and rehabilitation treatments and orthopedic parts. Therefore, such post-retirement health benefit costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements of the Company prepared in accordance with Colombian Government Entity GAAP, since retired workers and enrolled family members continue to receive full medical coverage. The same is true for deceased non-retired employees.

 

U.S. GAAP requires the recognition of pension, health care and education plans costs based on actuarial computations under a prescribed methodology which differs from that used under RCP. For purposes of the U.S. GAAP reconciliation, the transition obligation is calculated at the date the Company adopted the ASC Topic 420, 715, 805, and 835 Employers’ Accounting for Pensions and is being amortized as of January 1, 1989. The transition obligation for the education and medical plan is being amortized from January 1, 1995

 

Under Colombian law, employees are entitled to one month salary for each year of service. This benefit is known as the “severance obligation” or “cesantias”. This benefit accumulates during the time of employment and is paid to employees upon their termination or retirement from Ecopetrol. However, employees may request advanced benefit payments at any time. In 1990, the Colombian government revised its labor regulations to permit companies, subject to employee approval, to pay the severance obligation to their employees on a current basis. Law 50 of 1990 also enabled each employee to freely choose yearly which trust fund would manage the amount accrued during each year in which they are eligible for severance payments. This amount must be transferred by the Company to the trust fund no later than the next subsequent year.

 

In addition, the Company under Colombian law must pay pension bonds for certain employees when they leave Ecopetrol. Those bonds payable accrue interest at the DTF rate, according to the class of bonds, as follows:

 

1) For pension bonds type B, CPI + 4%;
2) For pension bonds type A, with date of transfer before December 31, 1998, CPI + 4%;
3) For the remaining pension bonds type A, CPI + 3%.

 

The economic assumptions used in the determination of pension obligations under U.S. GAAP differ from those used under RCP since the latter are established annually by the Colombian regulations.

 

Ecopetrol has not made any change to its methodology or accounting policy for the determination of disclosure information. However, since 2011 they are based on the calculations of a new actuary and therefore have a new valuation system.

 

The combined costs for the above mentioned benefit plans, determined using U.S. GAAP, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are summarized below: (all obligations were measured at year-end) 

 

    2012     2011     2010  
Components of net periodic benefit
costs:
  Pension     Other
Benefits (*)
    Total     Pension     Other
Benefits (*)
    Total     Pension     Other
Benefits (*)
    Total  
Service cost   $ -     $ 44,089     $ 44,089     $ -     $ 788     $ 788     $ 46,686     $ 32,840     $ 79,526  
Interest cost     840,944       525,628       1,366,572       830,411       371,698       1,202,109       845,144       386,159       1,231,303  
Expected return on plan assets     (720,034 )     (45,265 )     (765,299 )     (714,757 )     (164,644 )     (879,401 )     (1,303,018 )     (290,075 )     (1,593,093 )
Amortization of net (gain) or loss     18,531       81,589       100,120       592,582       24,564       617,146       22,977       41,293       64,270  
Net periodic pension cost under U.S. GAAP - (gain) or loss     139,441       606,041       745,482       708,236       232,406       940,642       (388,211 )     170,217       (217,994 )
Net periodic pension cost under Colombian GAAP (gain) or loss     (83,776 )     849,961       766,185       565,725       663,536       1,229,261       264,693       (146,411 )     118,282  
Difference to be recognized under U.S. GAAP (income) loss   $ 223,217     $ (243,920 )   $ (20,703 )   $ 142,511     $ (431,130 )   $ (288,619 )   $ (652,904 )   $ 316,628     $ (336,276 )

  

(*) Other benefits include education, health care, pension bonds and accrued retroactive severance.

 

F- 69
 

 

The changes in the benefit obligations and in plan assets for the above mentioned benefit plans, determined using U.S. GAAP, for the years end December 31, 2012 and 2011, are summarized below:

 

    Pension Plan     Other Benefits  
    2012     2011     2012     2011  
Reconciliation of project benefit obligation:                                
Project benefit obligation as of January 1   $ (11,196,520 )   $ (10,686,243 )   $ (6,628,739 )   $ (4,888,821 )
Service cost     -       -       (44,089 )     (788 )
Interest cost     (840,944 )     (830,411 )     (525,628 )     (371,698 )
Actuarial (gain) loss     (802,355 )     (332,635 )     155,978       (1,640,621 )
Benefit payments     660,243       652,769       271,656       273,189  
Projected benefit obligation as of December 31   $ (12,179,576 )   $ (11,196,520 )   $ (6,770,822 )   $ (6,628,739 )
Reconciliation of plan assets :                                
Fair value of plan assets as of January 1     10,631,832       9,105,179       671,346       2,097,376  
Fund contribution     -       1,568,695       269,048       (1,568,695 )
Expected return on plan assets     720,034       714,757       45,265       164,644  
Benefits paid     (660,243 )     (652,769 )     (271,656 )     (3,137 )
Actuarial (gain) loss on plan assets     430,848       (104,030 )     29,590       (18,842 )
Fair value of plan assets as of December 31   $ 11,122,471     $ 10,631,832     $ 743,593     $ 671,346  
                                 
Projected net benefit obligation and assets, as of December 31     801,161       940,601       (3,681,660 )     (3,344,667 )
Amounts recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss     (1,858,266 )     (1,505,289 )     (2,345,570 )     (2,612,726 )
                                 
Net liability     (1,057,105 )     (564,688 )     (6,027,230 )     (5,957,393 )
Net liability under Colombian Government Entity GAAP     (865,328 )     (949,105 )     (2,989,847 )     (2,587,529 )
Net effect under pension plan and other benefits   $ (191,777 )   $ 384,417     $ (3,037,383 )   $ (3,369,864 )

 

Under U.S. GAAP, the method of allocating the comingled asset fund as of the valuation date between the pension and the pension bond plan have been changed from allocating the asset fund in proportion to the amounts of the respective liabilities.

 

While under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, to allocating the total return for the year between the two plans by calculating a return for each plan, equal to the fund´s total return, given the beginning balances and actual payments for the year. The allocated return added to the beginning balance plus contributions and less the actual payments results in the year-end balance.

 

Net liability of employee benefit plans, net of other employee benefits, is classified as follows:

 

Decree 1861 of 2012 establishes the investment regime for trust funds guaranteeing pension plans of governmental entities, which precepts are intended to bear a moderate risk. Assets fund investment decisions are made accordingly, following, among other, next restrictions:

 

- Investments in public debt shall not exceed 50% of fund assets value.
- Investments in joint portfolios, limited to 5% of fund assets value, are allowed only if its index is representative of general market behavior, and is not related to specific economic sectors or specific issuers.
- Investments in funds representing a foreign index are limited to 5% of fund assets.
- Investments in Ecopetrol S.A. shares are allowed.
- Forbidden investments:

 

o Shares of foreign companies or securities representing these shares.
o Asset-backed securities different from mortgage-backed securities.
o Private capital funds.
o Investments regarding related parties of trust fund manager.

 

The fair value of asset fund is calculated using quoted market prices in active markets. The company obtains these quoted prices from renowned trustworthy financial data providers in Colombia or abroad depending on the investment. For those portfolio items not having a quoted price the Company uses an income approach technique capturing observable market data. Our fair value measurements did not use any unobservable inputs for significant valuations as of December 31, 2012.

 

Net liability of employee benefit plans, net of other employee benefits, is classified as follows:

 

    Pension Plans     Other Benefits     TOTAL  
    2012     2011     2012     2011     2012     2011  
Current portion   $ -     $ -     $ (264,076 )   $ (268,647 )   $ (264,076 )   $ (268,647 )
Long-term portion     (1,057,105 )     (564,688 )     (5,763,154 )     (5,688,746 )     (6,820,259 )     (6,253,434 )
Net liability   $ (1,057,105 )   $ (564,688 )   $ (6,027,230 )   $ (5,957,393 )   $ (7,084,335 )   $ (6,522,081 )

 

Under U.S. GAAP, the Company applies the provisions of Statement on ASC Topic 420, 715, 805 and 835, as amended by Statement on ASC Topic No. 450 and 715, Employers Disclosure about Pension and Other Post-retirement Benefits, an amendment to ASC Topic No. 420, 715, 805, and 835, 712 and 710. The Company adopted Statement on ASC Topic No. 715 effective January 1, 2006, in respect of its defined benefits pension, health and education plans. Accordingly, the Company recognizes the overfunded and underfunded status of each of its defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans as an asset or liability and to reflect changes in the funded status through Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. The actuarial calculations are estimated at year-end dates

 

F- 70
 

 

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, net obligation amounts recognized in the balance sheet related to pension, health, education, bonds and severance obligations consist of:

 

    2012     2011  
Long-term liability                
Pension   $ (1,057,105 )   $ (564,688 )
Health care     (5,183,081 )     (5,286,782 )
Education     (476,507 )     (399,142 )
Bonds     (102,148 )     -  
Severance     (1,418 )     (2,822 )
Total long-term liability   $ (6,820,259 )   $ (6,253,434 )

 

As of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, related to pension, health and education obligations consist of:

 

    2012     2011     2010  
Other comprehensive income                        
 Actuarial income (loss)                        
Pension   $ (1,858,266 )   $ (1,505,289 )   $ (1,661,206 )
Health care     (3,239,842 )     (3,795,848 )     (1,373,096 )
Education     (213,816 )     (109,493 )     (139,445 )
Bonds     1,102,706       1,284,430       534,714  
Severance     5,382       8,185       -  
Total other comprehensive income (loss)     (4,203,836 )     (4,118,015 )     (2,639,033 )
Deferred income tax effect     1,387,266       1,358,945       870,881  
Total   $ (2,816,570 )   $ (2,759,070 )   $ (1,768,152 )

 

The significant variation in the other comprehensive income from 2011 to 2012 relates to health and bonds plans due to changes in actuarial assumptions since the last actuarial valuation.

 

The Company expects the following amounts in other comprehensive income to be recognized as components of net periodic pension cost during 2013:

 

    Years for
Amortization
    Amortization  
Pension     20.26     $ (31,605 )
Bonds     14.07       72,362  
Health Care     20.17       (133,891 )
Education     20.10       (8,001 )
Severance     12.67       404  
Total           $ (100,731 )

 

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the amounts of gain (loss) in the year and accumulated related with pension, health, education bonds and severance consist of:

 

    2012     2011     2010  
    Gain (loss) in the year     Cumulative Gain
(loss)
    Gain (loss) in the year     Cumulative gain (loss)     Gain (loss) in the year     Cumulative gain (loss)  
                                     
Pension   $ (371,507 )   $ (1,858,266 )   $ (332,635 )   $ (1,505,289 )     (58,216 )     (1,661,206 )
Health care     394,226       (3,239,842 )     (2,473,272 )     (3,795,848 )     (457,941 )     (1,373,096 )
Education     (107,551 )     (213,816 )     25,757       (109,493 )     (56 )     (139,445 )
Bonds     (98,915 )     1,102,706       798,709       1,284,430       578,374       534,714  
Severance     (2,192 )     5,382       8,185       8,185       -       -  

  

F- 71
 

 

The economic assumptions adopted are shown below in nominal terms. Those assumptions used in determining the actuarial present value of the pension obligation and the projected pension obligations for the plan years were as follows:

  

    2012     2011  
    Pension     Health     Education     Bonds     Severance     Pension     Health     Education     Bonds     Severance  
Discount rate     6.25 %     6.25 %     5.50 %     5.50 %     5.50 %     6.25 %     8.25 %     7.50 %     7.50 %     5.75 %
Rate of compensation and pension increases     4.00 %     11.20 %     4.00 %     4.00 %     4.00 %     4.50 %     18.40 %     4.50 %     4.50 %     4.50 %
Expected rate of return     7.00 %     -       -       7.00 %     -       3.38 %     -       -       3.38 %     -  
Mortality table     *       *       *       *       *       *       *       *       *       *  

  

* Colombian Mortality Table ISS, male and female, 2005-2008.

 

The Superintendence of Finance concluded a mortality study based on the experience of the affiliated workers to the pension funds and to the Social Security Institute ISS, during the years 2005-2008. The resulting mortality table from such study reflects the current mortality of the Colombian workers. As it was expected, the new table shows a lower mortality rate compared with those of the actual mortality table, ISS, experience 1981-1989. For such reason, the new table was applied for purposes of executing the different actuarial calculations included in this valuation in 2009.

 

The rate of return of the plan assets during 2012 was 11.02%. We have considered the expected rate of return on plan assets of 7.00% and an expected inflation rate equal to 3.00% at December 31, 2012, with a discount rate of 6.25%.

 

In 2011, the health plan had an increase in the obligation since the amount reflects the current medical cost trend during the last 3 years in increases in health costs in Colombia. In 2010, the Company did not consider generating an increase in health care obligation due to projections by the health department in 2009 and 2010. However, in 2011 and 2012, the most recent analyses by the health department shows a tendency to the decrease and control of the high costs.

 

The actuarial assumptions of health plan have changed since the last actuarial valuation as of December 31, 2011:

 

The 2011 valuation used a trend rate that starts at 18.4% and grades down to general inflation +1% over 10 years. In 2012 we used a trend rate starting at 11.20% and grading down to general inflation +1% over 10 years.

 

The 2010 valuation considered the current family group for active participants. For 2011 and 2012 the valuation was valued as an assumed family group, projected to retirement eligibility based on the demographics of the currently inactive population near first retirement eligibility.

 

The 2010 valuation does not consider spouses of active or inactive female participants. For 2011 and 2012 the valuation was valued for all eligible spouses of female inactive participants and projected spouses for active female participants.

 

The 2010 valuation uses a retirement age that depends on the employee completing the service requirement for retirement with Social Security using only with Ecopetrol. For 2011 and 2012 valuation, we have assumed an employee´s labor history and Social Security participation starting at age 25.

 

As mentioned above, as of December 31, 2012, the actuarial assumptions of Pension have changed since the last actuarial valuation as of December 31, 2011, with main updates as follows:

 

The 2010 liability was calculated as if a participant´s first employer was Ecopetrol. Since employment with other employers before and after employment with the Company is unknown, for the 2011 and 2012 valuations assumptions have been established to estimate the employee labor history.

 

The 2010 liability was calculated as if all participants have a Bond type B. For 2011 and 2012 the valuation was established assumptions that depend on the hire date and the Social Security system in which participants are enrolled.

 

The 2010 liability was calculated as if all participants would retire immediately. For 2011 and 2012 the valuation establishes retirement dates depending on whether the participants are eligible for the Company pension plan or the general Social Security retirement benefit.

 

The 2011 pension bond liability was calculated assuming that if a retired participant had not claimed his bond there was a likelihood that he would never claim it, equivalent to: a) 100 % after 15 years b) 50% among 10 and 15 years, c) 25% among 5 and 10 years; and d) 0% for less than 5 years. For 2012 this assumption was revised assuming there was a 100% likelihood after 3 years and 0% for less than 3 years.

 

F- 72
 

 

Estimated future benefit payments

 

The benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid as follows:

 

Period   Pension
Benefits
    Health Care
benefits
    Education
benefits
    Pension Bonds     Severance
Plan
 
2013     685,047       209,475       53,372       71,830       1,229  
2014     699,827       229,370       50,493       14,368       78  
2015     716,775       250,591       47,882       5,418       67  
2016     733,720       270,919       45,154       9,824       73  
2017     750,535       288,318       42,282       23,140       79  
Years 2018 – 2022     3,995,117       1,632,226       152,906       204,293       768  

 

All of the benefits estimated in the table above are to be paid from plan assets. The Company does not have any insurance policies that are intended to cover benefits that plan participants are to receive in the future.

 

Furthermore, to the Company currently does not intend to contribute to the fund in the upcoming fiscal year. Management believes that the plan assets will provide for a sufficient return to cover any payments that are necessary to be made in the upcoming year.

 

Assumed health care cost trend rates have an effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:

 

    1% Percentage Point  
    Increase     Decrease  
Effect on total of service and interest cost components   $ 18,965     $ 13,594  
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation   $ 872,271     $ 697,563  

 

Plan assets

 

Pension and pension bonds are covered by assets in a single fund with the following investment allocation:

 

    2012     2011  
Government securities   $ 49 %   $ 47 %
Investments funds     35 %     33 %
Equity instruments     -       1 %
Other     16 %     19 %
    $ 100 %   $ 100 %

 

The plan assets do not contain any shares of stock of Ecopetrol or any of its related parties. However it includes bonds issued by the Company, representing 0.2% of fund investments.

 

vii. PROVISIONS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

For U.S. GAAP, Accounting for Contingencies (ASC 450), provides the guidance for recording contingencies. Under ASC 450, there are three levels of assessment of contingent events – probable, reasonably possible and remote. The term probable in ASC 450 is defined as “the future event or events that are likely to occur”. The term reasonably possible is defined as “the chance of the future event or events occurring is more than remote but less than likely”. While the term remote is defined as “the chance of the future event or events occurring is slight”.

 

Under ASC 450, an estimated loss related to a contingent event shall be accrued by a charge to income if both of the following conditions are met:

 

Information available prior to issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred at the date of the financial statements

 

The amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.

 

The amount recorded is an estimate of the amount of loss at the date of the financial statements. If the contingent event is evaluated to be reasonably possible, no provision for the contingent event may be made, but disclosure of the event is required with amount of loss that is reasonably possible.

 

As a result of the difference in the definition of “probable” between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP, and the general interpretation of the definition in practice in Colombia, there is a difference in the amount of the provision for legal proceedings.

 

F- 73
 

 

The effects of this adjustment in the reconciliation of income were $(36,841); $335,983 and $67,629 in December 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

The effects of this adjustment in the reconciliation of consolidated shareholders´ equity were 313,637 and 350,535in December 2012 and 2011 respectively.

 

viii. ASSETS AND LIABILITIES PRESENT VALUE

 

Under Colombian government Entity GAAP, accounts receivable and payable are recognized at amortized cost, represented by any uncollected or unpaid balances, regardless if such balances are due within the year or not. For U.S. GAAP purposes, the Company measures the long-term balances at present value by discounting future cash flows at the appropriate discount rate. Such balance is amortized using the effective interest method.

 

The estimated discount rate for long-term liability was calculated by our Treasury department and is based on the Colombian Government Treasury bonds as it was considered that the Company has a similar credit risk.

 

As a result of the measurement of the Equity Tax liability recognized by Ecopetrol and its subsidiaries in the year 2012 and 2011, an adjustment for $92,512 and $126,861 was recorded respectively.

 

ix. DEFERRED INCOME TAXES

 

Under U.S. GAAP a valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will not be realized.

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, deferred income taxes are calculated using the current statutory tax rate. Under U.S. GAAP, deferred income taxes are calculated based on rates and tax laws enacted at the reporting date considering the future tax rate that will apply when the deferred income tax difference will be realized.

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, since 2009, goodwill is deductible and does not generate differences between tax laws and the Colombian Government Entity GAAP, except by the difference in the time of amortization. Under U.S. GAAP, the goodwill is not amortizable and generates a temporary difference, as a result it is necessary to compute and recognize deferred income taxes for differences originated by deductions since the acquisition date.

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, the fair value of the assets is not recorded; the difference between this value (zero) and the value recorded under U.S. GAAP generates deferred tax calculated under ASC 740.

 

All of the income tax effects in the U.S. GAAP reconciliation are the tax effect of pretax adjustments, and none relate to differences between the accounting for income tax standards.

 

The Company and its subsidiaries file separate income tax returns since tax regulations do not allow consolidated income tax returns. There are no requirements to file tax returns by segments. Tax returns are required for each legal entity. Tax rate of Refineria de Cartagena S,A, Bioenergy and Comai is 15% because it has tax benefit until 2023, 2025 and 2021 respectively. The tax savings for the last three years has not been significant.

 

Taxable loss carry forwards are deductible in future years depending of countries tax regulations. As of December 31, 2012, Ecopetrol S.A and its subsidiaries had accumulated tax loss carry-forwards and excesses of presumptive income generated in previous years, as follows:

 

Expiration date   Loss carry-
forwards
    Excess of
presumed income
 
With no Maximum expiry date   $ 1,927,525     $ -  
2012     -       360  
2013     7,794       66,115  
2014     15,356       79,313  
2015     -       61,074  
2016     4,270       39,325  
2017     -       55,762  
2018     -       1,187  
2028     1,443,050       -  
    $ 3,397,995     $ 303,136  

 

Tax reform

 

The Congress of the Republic adopted Law 1607 of December 26, 2012, which introduces significant reforms to the Colombian tax system, in particular, the income tax rate was reduced from 33% to 25% starting in 2013, and the Equality Income Tax (Impuesto de Renta para la Equidad - CREE), was created with a rate of 9% from 2013 to 2015 and 8% starting in 2016; there are some differences between the treatment used to determine this tax and the one used to determine ordinary income tax.

 

F- 74
 

 

The following information regarding income taxes has been prepared under U.S. GAAP: 

 

Income Taxes

 

Total income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were comprised as follows:

 

    2012     2011     2010  
Income tax expense   $ 7,525,988     $ 8,399,086     $ 4,397,797  
Income tax effects based on items of other comprehensive income:                        
Pension plan liability     28,321       488,064       206,699  
Available-for-sale securities     (27,721 )     7,086       8,819  
    $ 7,526,588     $ 8,894,236     $ 4,613,315  

 

Income tax expense attributable to income from continuing operations consists of:

 

    2012     2011     2010  
Current provision   $ 7,095,874     $ 7,501,002     $ 3,201,040  
Deferred tax     430,114       898,084       1,196,757  
    $ 7,525,988     $ 8,399,086     $ 4,397,797  

 

In 2012, 2011 and 2010, there are foreign subsidiaries that do not pay income taxes and therefore do not generate income tax expense or deferred tax effects. Those entities that do pay taxes and are currently not generating taxable income will record a valuation allowance against any deferred tax asset recorded.

 

Amount of foreign and domestic pretax income:

 

    2012     2011     2010  
Domestic pretax income   $ 21,083,067     $ 22,470,684     $ 14,095,314  
Foreign pretax income     1,330,415       986,001       (1,254,593 )
 Income before income tax   $ 22,413,482     $ 23,456,685     $ 12,840,721  

 

Unremitted earnings accumulated as of December 31, 2012 of certain international subsidiaries totaling $1,388,340 are permanently invested. No deferred tax liability was recognized for the remittance of such earnings. The income tax liability that might be incurred if such earnings were remitted to Colombia is not practicable to estimate.

 

Tax Rate Reconciliation

 

Income tax expense attributable to income from continuing operations was $7,525,988, $8,399,086 and $4,397,797 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and differed from the amounts computed by applying the statutory income tax rate for Colombian entities that is 33% in 2012, 2011 and 2010 to pretax income from continuing operations as follows:

 

    2012     2011     2010  
Statutory income tax     33.00 %     33.00 %     33.00 %
Non – taxable income (exempt domestic dividend income)     0.04 %     (1.59 )%     (5.66 )%
Non – deductible expenses     0.28 %     3.66 %     4.64 %
Others     (0.15 )%     1.00 %     2.84 %
Other exempt income     (0.30 )%     (0.24 )%     (0.52 )%
Income taxable at other tax rate     0.60 %     (0.02 )%     (0.05 )%
Changes in tax rate     0.11 %     -       -  
Effective income tax under U.S. GAAP     33.58 %     35.81 %     34.25 %

 

Ecopetrol has no unrecognized tax benefits. The tax years open to the taxing authority’s reviews by major components are as follows:

 

Company   Tax years  
Ecopetrol S.A.     2012  
Refinería de Cartagena     2007 to 2012  

 

The Company is subject to income taxation in many jurisdictions around the world. Unrecognized tax benefits reflect the difference between positions taken or expected to be taken on income tax returns and the amounts recognized in the financial statements.

 

We recognize interest accrued related to an underpayment of income taxes in interest expense. Penalties, if recognized, would be presented as a component of other expense.

 

F- 75
 

 

Deferred Taxes

 

The significant components of deferred income tax expense attributable to income from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

 

    2012     2011     2010  
Deferred income tax expense (exclusive of the effects of other components below):                        
Accounts payable   $ 100,511     $ (129,334 )   $ (6,586 )
Inventories     (5,967 )     35,226       (6,949 )
Property, plant and equipment, principally due to DD&A     78,201       (36,884 )     (1,223,111 )
Deferred charges     (11,185 )     (580 )     92,747  
Prepaid expenses     (75 )     62,930       (52,613 )
Capital lease asset     83,829       (39,109 )     11,597  
Monetary correction and other     (275,294 )     150,603       212,482  
DD&A and inflation adjustments     310,351       (305,288 )     890,348  
Investment     (352,018 )     164,276       (111,530 )
Direct finance lease     (39,922 )     39,922       -  
Estimated liabilities and provisions     (73,955 )     (58,663 )     87,423  
Accounts and notes receivable     (6,194 )     2,337       (3,734 )
Carry forward loss     (159,549 )     (43,515 )     16,652  
Pension and benefits obligations     (56,941 )     (390,205 )     (98,280 )
Deferred income     -       140,422       7,811  
Natural and environmental resources capitalized expenses     381,072       1,069,749       23,841  
Valuation allowance     604,394       27,079       91,712  
Additional tax discount on the acquisition of productive assets according to ASC 740 (1)     534       6,939       1,276,705  
Excess in presumptive income tax     (373,085 )     14,225       (217,577 )
Other     37,608       (18,565 )     5,654  
Amortization of actuarial loss recorded in OCI     28,321       488,064       206,699  
Unrealized loss in available for sale securities     (27,721 )     7,086       8,819  
Amortization of fiscal goodwill according to (ASC 830)     187,199       (288,631 )     (15,353 )
    $ 430,114     $ 898,084     $ 1,196,757  

 

(1) This value corresponds to the deferred tax generated by the calculation of ASC 740, due to the implementation of the special deduction for investment in real productive assets.

 

F- 76
 

 

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2012 and 2011 are presented below:

 

    2012     2011  
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities                
Deferred income tax assets:                
Inventories   $ 39,886     $ 33,919  
Investments     1,390,880       937,774  
Accounts and notes receivable     6,896       702  
Deferred income     -       -  
Property, plant and equipment, principally due to DD&A     2,991,078       3,069,279  
Deferred charges     28,348       17,164  
Prepaid expenses     169       95  
Financial obligation, principally due to capitalized leasing     62,797       146,626  
Pension obligations     1,104,155       1,047,213  
Accounts payable     170,076       270,587  
Carry forward loss (1)     333,344       173,795  
Excess in presumptive income tax (2)     691,179       318,094  
Other     1,295       561  
Amortization of fiscal goodwill according to ASC 830     385,800       574,472  
Estimated liabilities and provisions     918,770       844,815  
Total gross deferred income tax assets     8,124,673       7,435,096  
Less valuation allowance (3)     (826,612 )     (222,218 )
Deferred income tax assets     7,298,061       7,212,878  
Deferred income tax liabilities                
Natural and environmental properties due to the difference between the methods of amortization     1,915,156       1,534,084  
Monetary correction and other     505,788       781,082  
DD&A and inflation adjustments     1,191,049       880,699  
Investments     1,835,482       1,734,394  
Direct finance lease     -       39,923  
Deferred income tax liabilities     5,447,475       4,970,182  
Net deferred income tax assets   $ 1,850,586     $ 2,242,696  

 

The realizability of the net deferred tax assets detailed above is expected given that it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax. For those which realizability is in question valuation allowances have been provided.

 

(1) Carry forwards losses are generated by subsidiaries and according to local tax laws, these losses do not expire.
(2) The excess in presumptive income tax are generated by subsidiaries and will expire in 5 years.
(3) The changes in the valuation allowance is mainly due to 2012 tax losses originated by Ecopetrol do Brazil, Ecopetrol America Inc. and Refineria de Cartagena amounted $620,915 approximately offsetted by utilizations in Ecopetrol del Peru and ODC, amounting $16,521 approximately, as detailed bellow:

 

    2012     Variation     2011  
Ecopetrol do Brazil   $ 248,991     $ 90,717     $ 158,274  
Ecopetrol del Peru     46,893       (969 )     47,862  
ODC     -       (15,552 )     15,552  
Bioenergy     463       -       463  
Ecopetrol America Inc.     520,861       520,861       -  
Refineria de Cartagena     9,404       9,337       67  
    $ 826,612     $ 604,394     $ $ 222,218  

 

x. REVENUE RECOGNITION

 

a.1 Over and under deliveries

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, the Company recognizes receivables from or payables to partners and to pipeline companies based on the cost of the inventory.

 

The Company’s crude oil over balance position at December 31, 2012 was $221,350 and at December 31, 2011 was $659,535 equivalent to 968,656 and 4,184,690 barrels, respectively.

 

F- 77
 

 

For U.S. GAAP purposes, the Company utilizes the entitlement method of accounting for over and under positions by which the amount of crude oil sold is based on its shared interest in the properties, and revenue is recognized based on market prices. The pipeline imbalances determined through volume allocation are recorded as either receivables or payables as per EITF 90-22. valued at selling prices.

 

During 2012, the Company identified some transactions that Ecopetrol was considering as Over and Under lifting but corresponded mainly to transportation imbalances and therefore not to entitlement accounting. This, given that the distribution of the production is done at the wellhead and in that sense none of the association contracts establishes the possibility to sell oil on behalf of the other party. Accordingly, the values that would affected Ecopetrol´s income in previous years as a revenue recognition issue should be recognized as imbalances with the transporter. Given the financial and operational mechanics of these inventories, the record should affect the cost of sales because these imbalances will be delivered by or return to Ecopetrol in kind and not adjusting income and being presented in the reconciliation netting the adjustment of cost of sales, as previously done. The valuation would remain at selling prices in accordance with the requirements of the EITF90-22. However, according to ASC 250 and SAB 108, we do not consider such amount significant and decided to adjust revenues and cost of sale as of 2012. The said adjustment as of December 31, 2011 represents lower net assets and higher net income amounting $286,203 (higher net assets and lower net income amounting $21,975 in 2010).

 

a.2 Cost of Sales

 

Under U.S. GAAP, the related cost of sale in the reconciliation of net income for over and under deliveries transactions described at a.1 above amounted to $208,644, $(449,225) and $158,609 during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, in comparison with the amount recognized under Colombian Government Entity GAAP.

 

a.3 Net vs. Gross sales

 

The Company has sales transactions were it transports crude oil, from the supplier to the customer, using its pipelines. For U.S. GAAP purposes, when price is fixed, there are no changes made to the product and the Company has no physical inventory loss risk, among other criteria, the Company records such sales on a net basis. Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, such crude oil sales are recognized gross.

 

xi. INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS

 

The Colombian Government Entity GAAP consolidated financial statements were adjusted for inflation based on the variation in the IPC (Colombia’s equivalent to the consumer price index in the United States) for middle income-earners from January 1, 1992 to December 31, 2001 for Ecopetrol S.A. and from January 1, 1992 to December 31, 2006 for Oleoducto de Colombia S.A. (ODC), Hocol S.A., Oleoducto Central S.A. (Ocensa), Equion, and Reficar S.A. The adjustment was applied monthly to non-monetary assets, equity (except for the valuation surplus) and memorandum accounts.

 

Under U.S. GAAP, the aforementioned adjustments under Colombian Government Entity GAAP are not applicable and have been reversed.

 

xii. INVENTORIES

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, inventories are valued at the lower of average cost or sale price. Under U.S. GAAP, inventories are valued at the lower of average cost or market value, the determination of which can be made using several different methods acceptable under U.S. GAAP. An adjustment has been recorded to reflect the difference in the method used to determine the valuation of inventories that arises from using sale price instead of market value, as defined by U.S. GAAP. Inventories are also affected by the effect of adjustments to cost of sales included in this reconciliation. These adjustments are related to depreciation, expenses capitalized in property, plant and equipment, asset retirement cost and impairment of long-lived assets.

 

The effects of this adjustment (loss) gain in the reconciliation of income were $(16,699), $76,126, and $(87,797) in December 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

The effects of these adjustments in the reconciliation of equity and the corresponding effect in inventory were $(55,078) and $(38,473) at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

xiii. LEASE ACCOUNTING

 

Under both Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP, lease accounting for capital leases and operating leases is similar. However, the tests used to determine if a lease is a capital or an operating lease differs between Colombian Government Entity GAAP and U.S. GAAP. In applying the tests in accordance with Colombian Government Entity GAAP, the Company has determined that all leases are operating leases. Under U.S. GAAP some of these leases should be accounted for as capital leases in accordance with ASC 840-10. As a result, adjustments were recorded to reflect the related assets and liabilities, and to recognize interest expense and de-recognize operating expenses associated with the lease payments.

 

Embedded Leasing

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, there is no requirement to identify whether the arrangements or contracts contain leases.

 

F- 78
 

 

Under U.S. GAAP, an arrangement contains a lease if both of the following two criteria are met:

 

1. The arrangement depends on a specific fixed asset, either identified contractually or implicitly identified as no alternative item could feasibly be used.

 

2. The purchaser has the right to control the use of the underlying fixed asset, such control demonstrated by the existence of any of the following qualitative conditions:

 

a) The purchaser can operate the asset or direct others to operate the asset while obtaining or controlling more than a minor amount of the asset’s output;
b) The purchaser can control physical access to the asset while obtaining or controlling more than a minor amount of the asset’s output; or
c) Probability is remote that another party will get more than minor amount of the asset’s output and the price is not fixed per unit.

 

Under U.S. GAAP, if the arrangement contains a lease, ASC 840 is applied by both purchaser and supplier for recognition, measurement, classification and disclosure purposes.

 

Build, Operate, Maintain and Transfer (BOMT)

 

Future Payments   Ecogas (1) - ECP     Dina – Tello (2) –
ECP
    Gibraltar (3) - ECP     Termo ERB (4) –
ODL
    Termo Servicios (4)
- ODL
    Termo Proyectos
(4) - ODL
 
Year   USD
(million)
    Pesos     USD
(million)
    Pesos     USD
(million)
    Pesos     USD
(million)
    Pesos     USD
(million)
    Pesos     USD
(million)
    Pesos  
2013   $ 17.3     $ 30,578     $ 3.3     $ 5,850     $ 2.1     $ 3,748       3.0     $ 5,234       2.9     $ 5,190       2.9     $ 5,190  
2014     17.0       30,037       3.8       6,650       2.2       3,872       2.9       5,207       2.9       5,163       2.9       5,163  
2015     17.0       30,037       4.3       7,534       2.3       4,000       2.9       5,205       2.9       5,160       2.9       5,160  
2016     16.2       28,695       4.8       8,509       2.3       4,132       3.0       5,219       2.9       5,174       2.9       5,174  
2017     10.3       18,256       5.4       9,585       2.4       4,268       2.9       5,205       2.9       5,160       2.9       5,160  
Payments after 2017     0.1       92       -       -       21.6       38,228       9.6       16,911       10.2       18,053       11.7       20,654  
    $ 77.9     $ 137,695     $ 21.6     $ 38,128     $ 32.9     $ 58,248       24.3     $ 42,981       24.7     $ 43,900       26.2     $ 46,501  

 

The Transmetano agreement finished in the year 2012.

 

(1) Three original leases that were accounted for as capital leases under U.S. GAAP are BOMT contracts, the use of which are specifically required under Colombian law for projects that involve the building, operating, maintaining and transferring of natural gas pipelines for the transportation of natural gas. These contracts had original terms of 20 years, no renewal provisions, and a purchase option. The rights to the leased assets were subsequently transferred to a related Company (ECOGAS) that was sold, but Ecopetrol was not relieved of the primary obligation under the original lease. This transfer was considered a sublease accounted for as a direct finance lease. In 2007, Ecopetrol received a prepayment of all amounts to be received during the term of the sublease contract.

 

(2) In 2010, we entered in a new BOMT, corresponding to the gas treatment plant located in the Dina-Tello field with an estimated value of construction US$28 million. This BOMT is accounted as capital lease in accordance with ASC 840 such as the contracts described previously, this contract had original term of 8 years, ending in 2017.

 

(3) Ecopetrol subscribed a contract with Unión Temporal Gas Gibraltar firm to advanced the design, build, operation and maintenance of a plant of treatment with 30 capacity of mpcd. Likewise, for the marketing of this product a contract with Natural Gas E.S.P was signed., Company that it contracted with the Company TransOriente E.S.P the construction of the pipeline that will transport the treated gas from the Gibraltar field to Bucaramanga, where it will be connected with the national system of gas transport. The plant of gas processing of Gibraltar is located between the populations of Toledo (Norte de Santander) and Cubará (Boyacá). This BOMT is accounted as capital lease in accordance with ASC 840 such as the contracts described previously, this contract had original term of 15 years, ending in 2026.

 

(4) ODL signed three agreements for the acquisition of assets necessary for energy conversion. The purpose of these assets is to ensure availability of capacity to meet the needs of power consumption in ODL booster station 1 (ER1). Booster station (ER2) and Rubiales Field.

 

The assets will be owned by ODL beyond the duration of the agreement and settle purchase option, or ends early to settle the purchase option at any time by the contract elapsed time. ODL has no obligation to perform the purchase option, if not the assets will be removed by the contractor.

 

ODL considering the guidelines of the regulations established under U.S. GAAP ASC 840. According to this rule, these contracts were treated as a finance lease therefore recorded an asset and a liability for the present value of their initial measurement and subsequent measurement at amortized cost.

 

F- 79
 

 

In 2011 the BOMT´s contracts were recognized in the adjustment No. 14, with an annual interest rate of 9.13% equivalent ODL Average debt.

 

During 2012 is included under the guidelines of RCP with an annual interest rate of 3% equivalent to the CPI projection target of the Bank of the Republic of Colombia in the long term, taken from Ecopetrol instructive: "Bases of subordinated financial planning and budget 2013-2015 ". For U.S. GAAP 2012 report, was eliminated this recognition made in 2011 and made a reclassification of accounts coming from RCP to use the same accounts under U.S. GAAP.

 

The accounting recognition of contracts BOMT's under RCP follows the same guidelines of normativity U.S. GAAP (ASC - 840), and using a discount rate of 3%

 

xiv. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and are adjusted for inflation until 2001. The cost includes administrative expenses until 2004, financial expenses and exchange differences from foreign currency financing until the asset is placed in service. Normal disbursements for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense and those significant costs that improve efficiency or extend the useful life are capitalized. Under U.S. GAAP, cost includes expenditures until the asset is placed in service such as installation cost, freight, interest, retirement cost; construction cost and other direct expenses are capitalized, with exception of adjustment for inflation and foreign currency loss. For U.S. GAAP purposes, administrative expenses capitalized were eliminated from property, plant and equipment. In addition, a deferred income tax asset resulted from the application of the provisions of ASC 740-10, Accounting for Acquired Temporary Differences in Certain Purchase Transactions that are not Accounted for as Business Combinations , since the investment in real productive assets creates an additional tax deduction of 30% in 2010. Starting in January 2011, investment tax credit were no longer be available.

 

The following table reflects the net changes in capitalized exploratory wells during 2012 and 2011 it does not include amounts that were capitalized and recorded as expenses during the same period under the successful efforts method.

 

    2012     2011  
Opening balance at January 1   $ 928,857     $ 418,740  
Additions from business combination     -       2,278  
Additions to capitalized exploratory well costs     915,771       918,955  
Reclassifications to wells, facilities and equipment based on the determination of proved reserves     (138,427 )     (32,157 )
Capitalized exploratory well costs charged to expense*     (278,254 )     (378,959 )
Ending balance at December 31   $ 1,427,947     $ 928,857  

 

* Includes $10,748 and $32,351 of capitalized exploratory well costs at December 31, 2012 and 2011 respectively, which were declared as dry wells during 2012 and 2011 respectively.

 

F- 80
 

 

Accounting For Suspended Exploratory Wells

 

The following tables provide an aging of capitalized exploratory well costs based on the date the drilling was completed and the number of projects for which exploratory well costs have been capitalized for a period greater than one year since the completion of the drilling:

 

    Year ended December 31,  
    2012     2011  
Capitalized exploratory well costs that have been capitalized for a period greater than one year   $ 519,747     $ 184,217  
Number of projects that have exploratory well costs that have been capitalized for a period greater than one year     30       23  

 

            2012  
Entity   Well   Comment   Total > 1
Year
    1 to 3
Years
    3 to 5
Years
    More than
5 Years
 
ECP   Oripaya 1   Gas well. Pending drilling a boundary well.   $ 53,315     $ 53,315     $ -     $ -  
ECP   Rumbero 1   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     51,000       51,000       -       -  
ECP   Rumbero ST 1   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     25,674       25,674       -       -  
ECP   Mito 1   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     34,002       34,002       -       -  
ECP   Trasgo   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     22,047       22,047       -       -  
ECP   Rio Zulia West 3   Producing well, pending ANH license for dispose the well     17,255       -       17,255       -  
ECP   Fontana   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     16,236       16,236       -       -  
ECP   Pinocho   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     9,255       9,255       -       -  
ECP   Fauno   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     9,122       9,122       -       -  
ECP   CSE 8 ST 1   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     8,225       8,225       -       -  
ECP   Quifa 6   Producing well, pending environmental license extension to install a production line and to request commerciality.     2,560       2,560       -       -  
ECP   Quifa 31   Producing well in process to reclassification  proved properties     1,810       1,810       -       -  
ECP   Opalo-3   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     1,688       1,688       -       -  
ECP   Azabache-1   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     942       942       -       -  
ECP   Quifa 32   Producing well in process to reclassification  proved properties     708       708       -       -  
ECP   Opalo-2   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     697       697       -       -  
ECP   Ambar-5   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     195       195       -       -  
ECP   Ambar-1   Producing well in process to reclassification proved properties     116       116       -       -  
ECP   Quifa 12   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     83       -       83       -  
HOCOL   Corocora Sur 1   Producing well, pending environmental license extension to install a production line and to request commerciality.     4,047       4,047       -       -  
HOCOL   Bonga-1   Appraisal drilling     24,188       24,188       -       -  
HOCOL   Mamey   Appraisal drilling     24,973       24,973       -       -  
HOCOL   Bonga 1   Appraisal drilling     21,272       21,272       -       -  
HOCOL   Huron 1   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     30,769       -       -       30,769  
HOCOL    Huron 2   Appraisal drilling     14,815       14,815       -       -  
HOCOL   Afe   Appraisal drilling     134       134       -       -  
HOCOL   Merlin 2   Appraisal drilling     8,141       8,141       -       -  
HOCOL   Merlin 1   Appraisal drilling     3,420       3,420       -       -  
HOCOL    Dorcas 1   Appraisal drilling     4,572       4,572       -       -  
BRAZIL   Anadarko BM-C-29   Appraisal drilling     128,486       128,486       -       -  
        Total   $ 519,747     $ 471,640     $ 17,338     $ 30,769  

 

F- 81
 

 

            2011  
Entity   Well   Comment   Total > 1
Year
    1 to 3
Years
    3 to 5
Years
    More than
5 Years
 
ECP   Oripaya 1   Gas well. Pending drilling a boundary well.   $ 53,876     $ 53,876     $ -     $ -  
ECP   Rio Zulia West 3   Producing well, pending ANH license for dispose the well     17,255       -       17,255       -  
ECP   Quifa 6   Producing well, pending environmental license extension to install a production line and to request commerciality.     2,560       2,560       -       -  
ECP   Quifa 31   Producing well in process to reclassification  proved properties     1,810       1,810       -       -  
ECP   Quifa 32   Producing well in process to reclassification proved properties     697       697       -       -  
ECP   Ambar-1   Appraisal drilling     2,104       2,104       -       -  
ECP   Quifa 12   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     72       72       -       -  
HOCOL   Huron 1   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     33,597       -       33,597       -  
ECP   Tinkhana 1   Appraisal drilling     27,795       27,795       -       -  
ECP   Akacias -1   Appraisal drilling     20,955       20,955       -       -  
ECP   Pachaquiaro   Appraisal drilling     20,131       -       20,131       -  
ECP   Quifa 7   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     817       817       -       -  
ECP   Quifa 9   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     600       600       -       -  
ECP   Quifa 10   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     534       534       -       -  
ECP   Quifa 11   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     332       332       -       -  
ECP   Quifa 8   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     298       298       -       -  
ECP   Quifa 18   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     269       269       -       -  
ECP   Quifa 13   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     228       228       -       -  
ECP   Quifa 17   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     222       222       -       -  
ECP   Quifa B2   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     38       38       -       -  
ECP   Quifa Q2 24X   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     15       15       -       -  
ECP   Quifa K 20X   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     8       8       -       -  
ECP   Quifa F4 26X   Producing well in assessment of the complete project     3       3       -       -  
        Total     184,217       113,235       70,982       -  

 

a. Interest

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, all interest paid net of interest income is subject to capitalization regardless of the utilization of the funds. Exchange rate differential is also capitalized as part of the asset.The Company´s assessment of the methodology followed to determine the capitalization amount under U.S. GAAP considered more detailed information available to estimate the interest to be capitalized. Previous to 2010, the calculations were made based on the average monthly disbursements, as an improvement, the Company obtained a detail of the assets associated to the debt and was able to apply the analysis and calculations based on each project, providing further detail of interest capitalized. The impact was recognized during 2010 as it was considered a change in an accounting estimate per ASC 250-10-45-17 and 18, Change in Accounting Estimates.

 

The total interest capitalized during 2012 under Colombian Government Entity GAAP was $761,199 and the total interest capitalized under U.S. GAAP was $153,999. The effect of this adjustment in the reconciliation of income was $607,200 The total interest capitalized during 2011 under Colombian Government Entity GAAP was $207,514 and the total interest capitalized under U.S. GAAP was $85,337. The effect of this adjustment in the reconciliation of income was $122,177. The total interest capitalized during 2010 under RCP was $319,326 and the total interest capitalized under U.S. GAAP was $150,800. The effect of this adjustment in the reconciliation of income was $$168,527. 

 

b. Revaluation of property, plant and equipment and public accounting effect

 

Valuation surplus of property, plant and equipment and public accounting effect correspond to the difference between net book value and the market value for real estate or the current value in use for property, plant and equipment, determined by specialists. These accounts are reflected as valuations and as valuation surplus from reappraisals of assets and the public accounting effect (components of equity) in the Company’s consolidated balances sheets. The last valuation was in December 2012. Technical appraisals are valid for three years.

 

Under U.S. GAAP, the valuation surplus of assets and the public accounting effect are not permitted. The effect of this adjustment in the reconciliation of Equity as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, $19,503,673, $12,396,858, respectively.

 

c. Impairment

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP , technical appraisals for property, plant and equipment are performed at least every three years. If the technical study is lower than the carrying value, the difference is recorded in equity as a reduction of the property, plant and equipment carrying value even if it reduces the valuation surplus below zero. Under U.S. GAAP, in accordance with ASC 360-10, Property, Plant, and Equipment - Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (ASC 360-10), property, plant, and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset to be tested for possible impairment, the Company first compares undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset to the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value of the long-lived asset is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary. For U.S. GAAP purposes, the Company reviewed property, plant and equipment for impairment as of December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, and recorded impairment losses when required. For U.S. GAAP purposes, the Company recorded in 2012, 2011 and 2010, $276,145, $136,357, and $135,469, respectively, as additional impairment charges to reduce the net book value of certain field assets and pipelines to their estimated recoverable values. 

 

F- 82
 

 

xv. DEPRECIATION, DEPLETION AND AMORTIZATION

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, all tangible equipment, including those used in crude oil and natural gas, exploration and development, are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the related estimated useful lives. Intangible crude oil and natural gas assets reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as natural and environmental resources are depleted on a units-of-production basis.

 

In the case of HOCOL, all tangible and intangible assets used in the production of crude and natural gas production are depreciated or depleted using the units of production method, using developed proved reserves, except for the pipeline asset which is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the related estimated useful life (20 years). For REFICAR, in the case of the unit “Viscorreductora”, this is depreciated based on a 4 year life on a straight line basis, ending in December 2012. For BIOENERGY, in relation to agricultural sugarcane crops, the Company develops the plantations that it will use as base for the production of Bioethanol. The cost of the agricultural plantations will be amortized during productive cycle time frame, in agreement with recognized technical value methods.

 

Under U.S. GAAP, all assets, including tangible equipment, used in crude oil and natural gas producing activities are required to be depreciated or depleted using a units-of-production method, using proved reserves calculated in accordance with SEC requirements. Therefore, an adjustment to net income per U.S. GAAP has been recorded to account for the difference in depreciation, depletion and amortization expense based on the above-described differences in the methods used. In addition, the financial statements reflect the amortization of those assets affected by the application of ASC 740-10, Accounting for Acquired Temporary Differences in Certain Purchase Transactions That Are Not Accounted for as Business Combinations. Therefore, an adjustment to net income per U.S. GAAP has been recorded to account for the difference in depreciation, depletion and amortization expense. 

 

xvi. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP , the Company updates annually the analysis of the estimated liability for future asset retirement obligations as of each balance sheet date. The liability is adjusted to the current value and an offsetting amount is recorded as an adjustment to the asset cost. Until 2009 the elements of the liability originated in U.S. dollars, changes in the foreign currency rates are included in the adjustment to the liability and the related asset, the component of the asset cost resulting from this liability is included in the depreciable base of the related asset.

 

For purposes of U.S. GAAP reporting, the Company follows the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 410-20 Asset Retirement Obligations .  ASC 410-20 requires the Company to recognize a liability for the present value of all legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible, long-lived assets as of the date the related asset was placed into service, and capitalize an equal amount as an asset retirement cost (asset).  Each period the liability is accreted using the effective interest rate method. The accretion is included as an operating expense. The cost associated with the abandonment obligation, is included in the computation of depreciation, depletion and amortization.

 

An adjustment has been recorded in the consolidated financial statements to reflect accretion expense, and the related obligation and assets in accordance with ASC 410-20.

 

For Pipeline systems there is insufficient information to reasonably determine the timing and/or method of settlement for estimating the fair value of the asset retirement obligation. In these cases, the asset retirement obligation cost is considered indeterminate because there is no data or information that can be derived from past practice, industry practice, our intentions or the estimated economic life of the asset. Useful lives of most pipeline systems are primarily derived from available supply resources and ultimate consumption of those resources by end users. Variables can affect the remaining lives of the assets which preclude us from making a reasonable estimate of the asset retirement obligation. Indeterminate asset retirement obligation costs will be recognized in the period in which sufficient information exists to allow us to reasonably estimate potential settlement dates and methods.

 

In addition to the aforementioned situation, it is not possible at this time to reasonably estimate the amount of any obligation for asset retirement obligation related to refineries since the Company undergoes major renovations. In addition, The Company believes there is not sufficient information available to estimate the fair value of the asset retirement obligation because the settlement date or the range of potential settlement dates have not been specified by others and information is not available to apply an expected present value technique.

 

F- 83
 

 

The following table presents the changes in asset retirement obligations for 2012 and 2011 as is required by ASC 410-20.

 

    2012     2011  
Balance at beginning of year   $ 2,125,900     $ 1,817,791  
Liabilities incurred in the current year     72,340       49,748  
Abandonment cost from business combination     -       81,046  
Revisions in estimated cash flows     (23,389 )     93,687  
Liabilities settled in the current period     (103,793 )     (50,168 )
Accretion expense     148,593       133,796  
Balance at end of year   $ 2,219,651     $ 2,125,900  

 

xvii. EQUITY CONTRIBUTIONS

 

a. Incorporated Institutional Equity

 

At the end of association contracts that were signed prior to January 1, 2004, private companies are required to transfer, without cost, to Ecopetrol, all producing wells, facilities and other real estate and assets acquired in executing the contracts. Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, the Company accounts for the receipt, using the relinquishing Company’s reported historical cost, by recording an increase to assets and equity. The assets are then depreciated in accordance with the Company’s previously disclosed accounting policies. For U.S. GAAP reporting purposes, these balances and their related impacts on accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization, and cost of production have been removed from the financial statements, based on the fact that the cost of these assets is zero.

 

The adjustment to conform to U.S. GAAP in 2012 was a reduction in equity of $37,088 (original value of $149,695 net of $112,607 in accumulated depreciation or the assets received), holds materials of $1,105.

 

The adjustment to conform to U.S. GAAP in 2011 was a reduction in equity of $50,479 (original value of $148,999 net of $98,520 in accumulated depreciation or the assets received), holds materials of $1,214.

 

The adjustment to conform to U.S. GAAP in 2010 was a reduction in equity of $62,592 (original value of $137,010 net of $74,418 in accumulated depreciation of the assets received) holds materials of $1,819.

 

b. Reversal of Concession Rights Contributed as Capital

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, the Company recorded as reservoirs the contributions of the Nation represented by crude oil and natural gas reserves deriving from the reversion of concessions of oilfield areas in favor of the Nation, given before the effectiveness of Decree 1760 of 2003. Reserves were valued by means of the technical-economic model where the value per barrel resulted from the relation of the net present value obtained at a discount rate and the total proved reserves on the contribution date.

 

For U.S. GAAP purposes, these reversions were considered a transfer of assets between entities under common control. Ecopetrol, the entity that received the net assets, recognized the assets transferred at their carrying amounts in the accounts of the transferring entity at the date of transfer which was zero value. The unamortized amount reverted at December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $17,013 and $19,737 respectively. Since 2003 (creation of the Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos - ANH) there have not been reversals of concessions.

 

xviii. INDEBTEDNESS COST

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, the borrowing costs correspond to interest paid, lender commissions and other costs related to the debt transactions, the exchange difference for the interest rate to be paid, the amortization of premiums and discounts in the placement of bonds and securities, and any income results earned on the temporary investment of such loans.

 

Under U.S. GAAP, the borrowing costs correspond to interest paid, lender commissions and other costs related to the debt transactions, the amortization of premiums and discounts in the placement of bonds and securities, should not offset interest expense with interest income, unless the financing transaction involves restricted, tax-exempt borrowings. Unlike Colombian Government Entity GAAP, the cost of borrowing does not include the exchange difference for the interest rate to be paid, unless such difference forms part of the negotiation of the interest rate for the transaction.

 

The total indebtedness cost incurred during 2012 under Colombian Government Entity GAAP was $820,821 and the total indebtedness cost incurred under U.S. GAAP was $820,856. The effects of this adjustment in the reconciliation of income were $36. The total indebtedness cost incurred during 2011 under Colombian Government Entity GAAP was $608,261 and the total indebtedness cost incurred under U.S. GAAP was $608,912. The effects of this adjustment in the reconciliation of income were $652. The total indebtedness cost incurred during 2010 under Colombian Government Entity GAAP was $ 519,697 and the total indebtedness cost incurred under U.S. GAAP was $521,367.The effects of this adjustment in the reconciliation of income were $1,670.

 

F- 84
 

 

 xix. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

 

a. Goodwill

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, goodwill corresponds to the difference between the acquisition price and the book value of the acquired Company recognized as an intangible asset. Separate intangibles are not identified under Colombian Government Entity GAAP nor are assets stepped up to fair values as a result of acquisitions; if the book value is higher than the acquisition price, the resulting difference is recorded as a gain. The amount recognized as goodwill is amortized during the period in which the Company expects to receive future benefits; in addition, it is subject to an annual impairment test

 

Under U.S. GAAP, goodwill is not amortized, but it is subject to an annual impairment test with the option of an initial qualitative test. In addition, the tax effect on temporary difference between tax basis and fair values is allocated to goodwill.

 

The following table shows, by Company, the goodwill balance as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 net of the amount of deferred income tax on goodwill and the translation adjustment:

 

Company   Balance  before
impairment
2011
    Goodwill
acquired during
2012
    Exchange
rate effect
    Deferred
income tax
    Balance before
impairment
2012
    Accumulated
impairment 2012
    Balance 2012  
Propilco   $ 694,387     $ -     $ (56,829 )   $ (1,540 )   $ 636,018     $ (46,691 )   $ 589,327  
Refineria de Cartagena S.A.     731,879       -       (65,729 )     -       666,150       -       666,150  
Bioenergy     8,993       -       -       -       8,993       -       8,993  
Total   $ 1,435,259     $ -     $ (122,558 )   $ (1,540 )   $ 1,311,161     $ (46,691 )   $ 1,264,470  

 

Company   Balance before
impairment
2010
    Goodwill
acquired during
2011
    Exchange
Rate Effect
    Deferred
Income tax
    Balance Before
impairment 2011
    Accumulated
Impairment
2011
    Balance 2011  
Propilco   $ 650,577     $ -     $ 45,282     $ (1,472 )   $ 694,387     $ (46,691 )   $ 647,696  
Refineria de Cartagena S.A.     721,062       -       10,817       -       731,879       -       731,879  
Bioenergy     8,993       -       -       -       8,993       -       8,993  
Equion     -       226,592       -       (226,592 )     -       -       -  
Total   $ 1,380,632     $ 226,592     $ 56,099     $ (228,064 )   $ 1,435,259     $ (46,691 )   $ 1,388,568  

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, the following table shows the amounts deductible for income tax purposes for 2012 and 2011.

 

    2012  
Company   Goodwill     Accumulated
Amortization
    Balance     Net Effect     Remaining
time-years
 
Propilco     327,986       (86,572 )     241,414       79,667       14,8  
Andean Chemicals Ltd   $ 357,629     $ (94,400 )   $ 263,229     $ 86,866       14,8  
IPL Enterprises     537,093       (137,257 )     399,836       131,946       12  
Offshore International Group – “OIG”     748,986       (186,175 )     562,811       185,728       11  
Hocol     748,947       (157,333 )     591,615       195,233       13  
Equion     972,409       (189,695 )     782,714       258,296       8.3  
Total   $ 3,693,050     $ (851,432 )   $ 2,841,619     $ 937,736          

 

    2011  
Company   Goodwill     Accumulated
Amortization
    Balance     Net Effect     Remaining
time-years
 
Propilco   $ 327,986     $ (68,002 )   $ 259,984     $ 85,795       15.8  
Andean Chemicals Ltd     357,629       (74,152 )     283,477       93,548       15.8  
IPL Enterprises     537,093       (101,451 )     435,642       143,762       13.0  
Offshore International Group – “OIG”     749,699       (130,766 )     618,933       204,248       12.0  
Hocol     801,911       (109,686 )     692,225       228,434       14.0  
Equion     957,513       (84,912 )     872,600       287,958       9.3  
Total   $ 3,731,831     $ (568,969 )   $ 3,162,862     $ 1,043,745          

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP in 2012 and 2011, $282,463 and $262,984 were amortized in regard to goodwill acquired from OIG, Ecopetrol Transportation Company, Hocol, Andean Chemicals, IPL Enterprises, Propilco and Equion. The amortization in the table above represents the accumulated amortization of the companies that could be deductible for income tax purposes. Under U.S. GAAP, goodwill acquired from OIG, which is recognized by the equity method, is included as part of the investment.

 

Under U.S. GAAP, Ecopetrol tests goodwill for impairment at least annually using a two step process that begins with an estimation of the fair value of a reporting unit. The first step is a screen for potential impairment and the second step measures the amount of impairment. Ecopetrol did not perform a qualitative analysis although allowed.

 

Fair value is determined by reference to market value, if available, or by a qualified evaluator or pricing model. Determination of a fair value by a qualified evaluator or pricing model requires management to make assumptions and use estimates. Management believes that the assumptions and estimates used are reasonable and supportable in the existing market environment and commensurate with the risk profile of the assets valued. However, different assumptions and estimates could be used which would lead to different results. The valuation models used to determine the fair value of these companies are sensitive to changes in the underlying assumptions. For example, the prices and volumes of product sales to be achieved and the prices which will be paid for the purchase of raw materials are assumptions which may vary in the future. Adverse changes in any of these assumptions could lead the Company to record a goodwill impairment charge.

 

F- 85
 

 

During 2011, Ecopetrol performed an impairment test of goodwill which showed that goodwill had been impaired in Propilco by $46,691, due to the increase in book value during current year as a result of a change in functional currency from Colombian pesos to US dollars. In addition during 2011 Propilco change their raw material suppliers due to Ecopetrol stopped providing it. New suppliers are more expensive than Ecopetrol so in the foreseeable a cost increase on Ecopetrol investment in Propilco is expected.

 

  b. Business Combination

 

During 2012, Ecopetrol was not incurred involved in any business combination.

 

In August 2010, Ecopetrol entered in into a memorandum of understanding with Talisman Colombia Holdco Limited, or Talisman, a Canadian oil and gas Company, to acquire BP Exploration Company (Colombia) Limited, a British Petroleum subsidiary operating in Colombia; the acquired Company was renamed as Equion Energia Limited. After obtaining required authorizations, we completed the acquisition, in January 24, 2011, which includes assets in oil and gas exploration and production as well as oil transportation and gas marketing. As a result of this acquisition, we increased our participation in the ownership of the Ocensa pipeline from 60.00% to 72.65%, in ODC from 66% to 73% and in Oleoducto del Alto Magdalena, or OAM assets, from 83.00% to 85.12%. We also acquired a 10.20% interest in Transgas de Occidente.

 

The total acquisition price, paid in cash, was US$1,596,157 thousands, Ecopetrol totals 51% ownership, the remaining 49% represents Talisman Energy Inc. share. The following table details the purchase price calculation (USD in thousands) as well as the Colombian peso equivalent (in millions) of the transaction using the effective exchange rate on the dates of the payments.

 

    Amount USD     Amount COP  
Purchase Price   $ 1,750,000          
Less: Purchase Price Adjustment     (153,842 )        
Adjusted Purchase Price     1,596,157          
Participation (%)     51 %        
Total Purchase Price   $ 814,040     $ 1,483,891  

 

The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination (ASC 805) which, among other things, requires assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be measured at their acquisition date fair values. Fair value measurements and Purchase Price Allocation process was finalized in fourth quarter 2011.

 

Pro-forma financial information is not presented as it would not be materially different from the information presented in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

 

The following table summarizes the measurement at fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

 

    Amount USD  
Current assets   $ 293,465  
Investments and long-term receivables     508,242  
Property, plant and equipment and reserves     1,367,948  
Deferred tax asset     15,073  
Other assets     24,913  
Total assets acquired   $ 2,209,641  
Current liabilities     331,145  
Long term debt     3,601  
Deferred tax liability     283,332  
Other liabilities     131,835  
Total liabilities acquired     749,913  
Net assets acquired   $ 1,459,728  
Non-controlling interest goodwill     66,850  
Goodwill     69,579  
Total consideration paid in cash   $ 1,596,157  

 

Property, plant and equipment and reserves were measured primarily using an income approach. The fair values of the acquired oil and gas properties were based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represent Level 3 measurements. Significant inputs included estimated resource volumes, assumed future production profiles, and assumptions on the timing and amount of future operating and development costs.

 

F- 86
 

 

The net assets acquired for US$1,459,728, represent $2,682,999 pesos and goodwill of $226,592 pesos. The goodwill represents the amount of the consideration transferred in excess of the values assigned to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill represents the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and separately recognized. The fair value of the 49% share of Talisman Energy Inc. is US$782,117.

 

In Colombia, the goodwill is deductible for tax purposes, thus, a deferred tax asset of $315,979 was recognized for the difference between the tax goodwill and the goodwill, resulting in a bargain purchase gain of $89,387 recorded in earnings for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

In addition, Ecopetrol increased its ownership interest in Ocensa and ODC while retaining control, as a result, the difference between the fair value and the carrying amount of the non-controlling interest was recognized in a decrease in additional paid-in-capital for the amount of $792,440.

 

 xx. NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

 

This table presents the carrying amount of total equity (net assets) attributable to the non-controlling interest as of December 31 of 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

    OCENSA     ODC     ODL     BIOENERGY     OBC     EQUION     TOTAL  
Balance 2009     482,896       14,192       128,477       9,153       -       -       634,718  
Other non-controlling interest     -       3,902       -       1,346       -       -       5,248  
Net income (loss)     223,403       (7,173 )     21,676       (975 )     (5,042 )     -       231,889  
Distribution of dividends     (99,888 )     -       -       -       -       -       (99,888 )
Return of capital through and due to spin-off     (144,251 )     -       -       -       -       -       (144,251 )
Dividends for spin-off     (318,670 )     -       -       -       -       -       (318,670 )
Translation adjustments     -       -       305       -       -       -       305  
Balance 2010     143,490       10,921       150,458       9,524       (5,042 )     -       309,351  
Acquired non-controlling interest (*)     (88,970 )     (3,536 )     -       -       -       1,425,702       1,333,196  
Issuance of Company shares     -       -       53,284       -       321,044       -       374,328  
Net income (loss)     37,787       (4,739 )     22,493       (2,294 )     (9,114 )     196,259       240,392  
Other comprehensive income     -       -       -       -       -       116       116  
Translation adjustments     -       -       1,404       -       -       29,332       30,736  
Balance 2011   $ 92,307     $ 2,646     $ 227,639     $ 7,230     $ 306,888     $ 1,651,409     $ 2,288,119  
Acquired non-controlling interest     -       -       -       (1,797 )     672       -       (1,125 )
Issuance of Company shares     -       -       -       5,492       -       -       5,492  
Net income (loss)     51,408       11,888       46,133       (1,593 )     (13,700 )     97,709       191,845  
Other comprehensive income     -       -       -       -       -       121       121  
Translation adjustments     -       -       (44 )     -       -       (49,923 )     (49,967 )
Spin-off of Ocensa shares     73,797       -       -       -       -       (73,797 )     -  
Dividends for Spin-Off     -       -       -       -       -       (37 )     (37 )
Balance 2012   $ 217,512     $ 14,534     $ 273,728     $ 9,332     $ 293,860     $ 1,625,482     $ 2,434,448  

 

(*) Ecopetrol acquired 51.00% of Equion Energia Limited on January 24, 2011. As a result of this business combination Ecopetrol increased its participation in Ocensa by 12.65% and its participation in ODC by 7.43%. The amount of $1,425,702 in Equion includes $205 related to its unrealized gains on bonds. In 2012 Ecopetrol and Talisman Energy Inc. proportionally spun-off Equion Energia Limited participation in Ocensa.

 

xxi. CUMULATIVE TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENT

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, the companies domiciled outside of the country, regardless of its functional currency, must report in USD and then translated to Colombian pesos with the impact recorded as cumulative translation adjustment.

 

For U.S. GAAP, the Company must remeasure all subsidiary financial information to its functional currency and then translate it to the reporting currency. This difference in methodology results in a difference in the translated amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements.

 

As such an adjustment is made to appropriately reflect amounts under translated U.S. GAAP.

 

xxii. PUBLIC OFFERING COST

 

In August 2011, the Company issued shares in a second public offering in Colombia. Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, all related costs of this issuance were expensed as well as a discount granted to shares fully paid in cash. For U.S. GAAP purposes, direct costs incurred in public offerings and cash discounts are recorded as a reduction of the proceeds received and, consequently, a reduction in equity. An adjustment in the amount of $103,949 was recorded to recognize the effect of these amounts. There were not any public offering shares during 2012.

 

F- 87
 

 

xxiii. EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

Under Colombian Government Entity GAAP, earnings per share ("EPS") are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average of both common and preferred shares outstanding for each period presented. However, although the Company has presented EPS under Colombian Government Entity GAAP for informational purposes, the presentation of EPS is not required for financial statements issued under Colombian Government Entity GAAP. The Company does not have any issued or outstanding preferred shares.

 

U.S. GAAP requires dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS for entities with complex capital structures, as well as a reconciliation of the basic EPS calculation with the diluted EPS calculation. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average of common shares outstanding for the corresponding period.

 

Diluted EPS assumes the issuance of common shares for all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the reporting period. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company had a simple capital structure. There are no any other compensation plan involving shares. Therefore, the Company is not required to present diluted EPS for these years.

 

xxiv. CONCENTRATIONS

 

In 2012, there were no customers in excess of 10% of total sales. In 2011, there were no customers in excess of 10% of total sales. In 2010 one customer of the refining segment accounted for 11.4% of total sales. One customer of the production segment and market and supply segment accounted for 10.5% from total sales. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of total sales in 2010. There was no exposure that affects the financial position of Ecopetrol if the company lost the client.

 

The majority of the Company’s assets and activities are located in Colombia. The financial position and results of operations of those subsidiaries located outside of Colombia are not material to the Company.

 

xxv. RECENTLY ADOPTED U.S. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

 

In May 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) - Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS, the amendments in this Update are the result of the work by the FASB and the IASB to develop common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). This amendment is effective prospectively, for public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Ecopetrol adopted this update in fiscal year 2012 and determined that there will not be any significant effect on fair value measurements or disclosures of the Company.

 

In June 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05 Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) - Presentation of Comprehensive Income, the amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements in order to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12 Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income In Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. Ecopetrol adopted these updates in fiscal year 2012 and determined that no significant effect will arise in our financial statements.

 

In October 2012, FASB issued ASU No. 2012-03 Technical Corrections and Amendments to SEC sections pursuant to SAB 114 and SEC Release 33-9250, and 2012-04 Technical Corrections and Improvements. These ASU introduce changes related to cross references among SEC and FASB and include minor changes in Codification that have no impact in our accounting policies.

 

Recently issued accounting standards and U.S. GAAP pronouncements

 

In December 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 Balance Sheet (Topic 210) - Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, the amendments in this Update require an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. On January 31, 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, which clarifies the scope of the offsetting disclosure requirements in ASU 2011-11. Under ASU 2013-01, the disclosure requirements would apply to derivative instruments accounted for in accordance with ASC 815, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending arrangements that are either offset on the balance sheet or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. However, as a result our analysis we don’t expect any impact at all due to we don’t have these compensation agreements.

 

The FASB issued ASU 2013-02 in February 2013. This standard became effective for the company on January 1, 2013. ASU 2013-02 changes the presentation requirements of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income in their entirety and their corresponding effect on net income. For other significant amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety, the standard requires the company to cross-reference to related footnote disclosures. Adoption of the standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the company's financial statement presentation.

 

F- 88
 

 

On February 28, 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04, which is based on a consensus reached by the EITF. The ASU requires entities to “measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date, as the sum of the following: a) The amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors b) Any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors.” Required disclosures include a description of the joint-and-several arrangement and the total outstanding amount of the obligation for all joint parties. The ASU permits entities to aggregate disclosures (as opposed to providing separate disclosures for each joint-and-several obligation). These disclosure requirements are incremental to the existing related-party disclosure requirements in ASC 850. The ASU is effective for all prior periods in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2013. Adoption of the standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the company's financial statement presentation.

 

On March 4, 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-05, which indicates that the entire amount of a cumulative translation adjustment (CTA) related to an entity's investment in a foreign entity should be released when there has been a) Sale of a subsidiary or group of net assets within a foreign entity and the sale represents the substantially complete liquidation of the investment in the foreign entity. b) Loss of a controlling financial interest in an investment in a foreign entity (i.e., the foreign entity is deconsolidated). c) Step acquisition for a foreign entity (i.e., when an entity has changed from applying the equity method for an investment in a foreign entity to consolidating the foreign entity). The ASU does not change the requirement to release a pro rata portion of the CTA of the foreign entity into earnings for a partial sale of an equity method investment in a foreign entity. the ASU is effective for fiscal years (and interim periods within those fiscal years) beginning on or after December 15, 2013. Adoption of the standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the company's financial statement presentation.

 

xxvi. SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

The following segment information has been prepared according to ASC 280 , Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.  Financial information by business segment is reported in accordance with the internal reporting system under Colombian Government Entity GAAP and shows internal segment information that is used by the chief operating decision maker to manage and measure the performance of Ecopetrol.

 

The financial information among segments is reported considering each business as a separate entity. Prices between segments are established by referencing those that would apply in an arm’s length transaction. Each segment should bear the costs and expenses required to put the product in terms of use or marketing. Each segment assumes its administrative expenses and all non-operational transactions related to their activity.

 

The Company operates under the following segments, which are described as follows:

 

Exploration and Production — this segment includes the Company’s oil & gas exploration and production activities. Revenue is derived from the sale of crude oil and natural gas to intercompany segments, at market prices, and to third parties. Revenue is derived from local sales of crude oil, regulated fuels, non-regulated fuels and natural gas. Sales are made to local and foreign distributors. Costs include those costs incurred in production. Expenses include all exploration costs that are not capitalized.

 

Refining and Petrochemicals – this segment includes the Company’s refining activities. Goods sold, both internally and to third parties, include refined products such as motor fuels, fuel oils and petrochemicals at market prices. This segment also includes sales of industrial services to third parties.

 

Transportation – this segment includes the Company’s sales and costs associated with the Company’s pipelines and other transportation activities

 

Market and Supply – this segment includes the Company’s revenues, costs and expenses associated with distribution, including distribution of purchases from third parties and the ANH ( Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos ).

 

These functions have been defined as the operating segments of the Company since these are the segments (a) that engage in business activities from which revenues are earned and expenses are incurred; (b) whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Company's chief operating decision maker to allocate resources to the segments and assess their performance; and (c) for which discrete financial information is available. Internal transfers represent sales to inter-company segments and are recorded and presented at market prices.

 

F- 89
 

 

The following tables present the Company’s consolidated balance sheet by segment in accordance with Colombian Government Entity GAAP:

 

    As of December 31, 2012  
    Exploration &
Production
    Refining
Activities
    Transportation     Market and
Supply
    Eliminations     Total  
Current assets                                                
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 6,157,784     $ 460,291     $ 1,272,326     $ 55,778     $ (5,489 )   $ 7,940,690  
Accounts and notes receivable     3,111,006       2,918,286       646,561       658,394       (2,072,746 )     5,261,501  
Inventories     1,078,414       1,411,636       795       547,956       (232,519 )     2,806,282  
Investments     2,095,917       33,680       52,041       18,646       (828,725 )     1,371,559  
Other current assets     3,334,857       1,979,056       307,559       25,789       (143,666 )     5,503,595  
      15,777,978       6,802,949       2,279,282       1,306,563       (3,283,145 )     22,883,627  
Investments in non-consolidated companies     1,022,084       40,900       12,210       1,996       -       1,077,190  
Property, plant and equipment, net     30,637,517       13,991,025       11,436,179       29,724       (390,760 )     55,703,685  
Other long term assets     18,867,275       7,694,224       12,745,077       344,823       (5,436,323 )     34,215,076  
Long term assets     50,526,876       21,726,149       24,193,466       376,543       (5,827,083 )     90,995,951  
Total assets   $ 66,304,854     $ 28,529,098     $ 26,472,748     $ 1,683,106     $ (9,110,228 )   $ 113,879,578  
                                                 
Accounts payable   $ (7,827,800 )   $ (1,743,525 )   $ (2,684,244 )   $ (915,703 )   $ 2,265,897     $ (10,905,375 )
Financial obligations short-term     (333,210 )     (443,208 )     (1,741,870 )     (1,896 )     281,045       (2,239,139 )
Other current liabilities     (6,427,763 )     (2,474,522 )     (947,912 )     (142,402 )     3,387       (9,989,212 )
Current liabilities     (14,588,773 )     (4,661,255 )     (5,374,026 )     (1,060,001 )     2,550,329       (23,133,726 )
Financial obligations long-term     (3,035,573 )     (8,210,403 )     (2,134,095 )     (21 )     1,913,406       (11,466,686 )
Other long term liabilities     (9,453,083 )     (2,053,543 )     (1,389,086 )     (163,694 )     1,123,288       (11,936,118 )
Long term liabilities     (12,488,656 )     (10,263,946 )     (3,523,181 )     (163,715 )     3,036,694       (23,402,804 )
Total liabilities     (27,077,429 )     (14,925,201 )     (8,897,207 )     (1,223,716 )     5,587,023       (46,536,530 )
Non-controlling interest     (1,020,677 )     (12,849 )     (1,569,016 )     -       375       (2,602,167 )
Shareholders’ equity of Ecopetrol     (38,206,748 )     (13,591,048 )     (16,006,525 )     (459,390 )     3,522,830       (64,740,881 )
Total equity     (39,227,425 )     (13,603,897 )     (17,575,541 )     (459,390 )     3,523,205       (67,343,048 )
Total liabilities and equity   $ (66,304,854 )   $ (28,529,098 )   $ (26,472,748 )   $ (1,683,106 )   $ 9,110,228     $ (113,879,578 )
Capital expenditures   $ 8,223,166     $ 4,458,762     $ 2,781,277     $ 4,657     $ -     $ 15,467,862  
Goodwill   $ 1,945,463     $ 514,093     $ 382,962     $ -     $ -     $ 2,842,518  

  

    As of December 31, 2011  
    Exploration &
Production
    Refining
Activities
    Transportation     Market and
Supply
    Eliminations     Total  
Current assets                                                
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 5,489,959     $ 403,905     $ 1,080,111     $ 63,662     $ (257,700 )   $ 6,779,937  
Accounts and notes receivable     3,653,401       (41,433 )     231,897       1,007,032       (214,361 )     4,636,536  
Inventories     1,147,213       1,343,072       855       503,991       (233,526 )     2,761,605  
Investments     1,358,439       45,388       351,260       39,164       (456,649 )     1,337,602  
Other current assets     1,519,940       1,563,270       342,980       98,726       (2,581 )     3,522,335  
      13,168,952       3,314,202       2,007,103       1,712,575       (1,164,817 )     19,038,015  
Investments in non-consolidated companies     962,906       20,888       16,902       19,363       -       1,020,059  
Property, plant and equipment, net     24,817,733       10,774,630       9,909,505       72,529       (100,229 )     45,474,168  
Other long term assets     17,232,843       5,841,229       6,463,476       594,169       (3,386,573 )     26,745,144  
Long term assets     43,013,482       16,636,747       16,389,883       686,061       (3,486,802 )     73,239,371  
Total assets   $ 56,182,434     $ 19,950,949     $ 18,396,986     $ 2,398,636     $ (4,651,619 )   $ 92,277,386  
                                                 
Accounts payable   $ (2,666,349 )   $ (1,035,829 )   $ (269,912 )   $ (933,515 )   $ 222,457     $ (4,683,148 )
Financial obligations (short-term)     (331,490 )     (321,391 )     (263,892 )     (1,890 )     87,069       (831,594 )
Other current liabilities     (6,607,085 )     (2,572,126 )     (975,849 )     (82,635 )     -       (10,237,695 )
Current liabilities     (9,604,924 )     (3,929,346 )     (1,509,653 )     (1,018,040 )     309,526       (15,752,437 )
Financial obligations (long-term)     (3,617,652 )     (2,429,766 )     (3,038,809 )     -       1,116,249       (7,969,978 )
Other long term liabilities     (10,049,747 )     (1,671,795 )     (1,435,931 )     (332,958 )     1,876,946       (11,613,485 )
Long term liabilities     (13,667,399 )     (4,101,561 )     (4,474,740 )     (332,958 )     2,993,195       (19,583,463 )
Total liabilities     (23,272,323 )     (8,030,907 )     (5,984,393 )     (1,350,998 )     3,302,721       (35,335,900 )
Non-controlling interest     (1,087,189 )     (11,219 )     (1,154,223 )     -       -       (2,252,631 )
Shareholders’ equity of Ecopetrol     (31,822,922 )     (11,908,823 )     (11,258,370 )     (1,047,638 )     1,348,898       (54,688,855 )
Total equity     (32,910,111 )     (11,920,042 )     (12,412,593 )     (1,047,638 )     1,348,898       (56,941,486 )
Total liabilities and equity   $ (56,182,434 )   $ (19,950,949 )   $ (18,396,986 )   $ (2,398,636 )   $ 4,651,619     $ (92,277,386 )
Capital expenditures   $ 8,067,968     $ 3,044,252     $ 3,382,463     $ 5,988     $ -     $ 14,500,671  
Goodwill   $ 2,102,481     $ 629,037     $ 432,244     $ -     $ -     $ 3,163,762  

 

F- 90
 

 

The Company’s consolidated statement of net income by segment is as follows in accordance with Colombian Government Entity GAAP:

 

    Year ended December 31, 2012  
    Exploration &
Production
    Refining
Activities
    Transportation     Market and
Supply
    Eliminations     Total  
                                     
Revenues:                                                
Local sales   $ 2,501,015     $ 19,008,223     $ 2,879,341     $ 1,121,995     $ (1,148,661 )   $ 24,361,913  
Foreign sales, net     26,607,600       7,717,048       591       15,452,650       (5,287,800 )     44,490,089  
Inter-segment net operating revenues     12,980,715       1,621,117       1,159,229       6,421       (15,767,482 )     -  
Total Revenue     42,089,330       28,346,388       4,039,161       16,581,066       (22,203,943 )     68,852,002  
Cost of sales     11,600,946       27,629,236       2,093,392       16,133,690       (22,213,927 )     35,243,337  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization     3,771,768       658,649       859,097       2,657       -       5,292,171  
Selling and projects     2,297,570       454,992       402,332       80,330       -       3,235,224  
Administration expenses     461,278       194,000       198,774       20,928       -       874,980  
Costs and expenses     18,131,562       28,936,877       3,553,595       16,237,605       (22,213,927 )     44,645,712  
Operating income     23,957,768       (590,489 )     485,566       343,461       9,984       24,206,290  
Financial income (expenses), net     (98,536 )     77,493       65,296       (56,950 )     (155,192 )     (167,889 )
Pension expenses     (378,442 )     (431,316 )     (137,574 )     (1,123 )     -       (948,455 )
Other non-operating income (expenses)     (142,171 )     (231,679 )     (186,564 )     (101,017 )     (96,814 )     (758,245 )
Other expenses, net     (619,149 )     (585,502 )     (258,842 )     (159,090 )     (252,006 )     (1,874,589 )
Income before income taxes and non-controlling     23,338,619       (1,175,991 )     226,724       184,371       (242,022 )     22,331,701  
Income tax benefit (expense)     (7,404,563 )     325,145       (23,005 )     (30,972 )     -       (7,133,395 )
Non-Controlling interest     (352,649 )     1,310       (68,020 )     -       -       (419,359 )
Net income for the year   $ 15,581,407     $ (849,536 )   $ 135,699     $ 153,399     $ (242,022 )   $ 14,778,947  

 

    Year ended December 31, 2011  
    Exploration &
Production
    Refining
Activities
    Transportation     Market and
Supply
    Eliminations     Total  
                                     
Revenues:                                                
Local sales   $ 1,729,123     $ 19,062,797     $ 2,547,156     $ 1,116,599     $ (901,046 )   $ 23,554,629  
Foreign sales, net     24,443,145       8,403,561       806       15,143,416       (5,578,043 )     42,412,885  
Inter-segment net operating revenues     13,558,328       1,566,700       1,589,959       14,483       (16,729,470 )     -  
Total Revenue     39,730,596       29,033,058       4,137,921       16,274,498       (23,208,559 )     65,967,514  
Cost of sales     10,108,169       27,583,170       2,040,593       15,409,850       (23,156,169 )     31,985,614  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization     3,311,968       607,446       798,355       1,201       -       4,718,970  
Selling and projects     1,597,171       409,820       262,047       101,996       -       2,371,033  
Administration expenses     552,900       261,456       200,134       4,427       -       1,018,917  
Costs and expenses     15,570,208       28,861,892       3,301,129       15,517,474       (23,156,169 )     40,094,534  
Operating income     24,160,388       171,166       836,792       757,024       (52,390 )     25,872,980  
Financial income (expenses), net     (241,989 )     (302,293 )     (115,164 )     (273,373 )     28,517       (904,302 )
Pension expenses     (292,011 )     (318,995 )     (94,664 )     (628 )     -       (706,298 )
Other non-operating income (expenses)     (134,405 )     (318,938 )     (89,657 )     (77,102 )     (846 )     (620,948 )
Other expenses, net     (668,405 )     (940,226 )     (299,485 )     (351,103 )     27,671       (2,231,548 )
Income before income taxes and non-controlling     23,491,983       (769,060 )     537,307       405,921       (24,719 )     23,641,432  
Income tax benefit (expense)     (7,938,519 )     270,062       (179,620 )     (107,644 )     -       (7,955,721 )
Non-Controlling interest     (208,962 )     1,151       (25,566 )     -       -       (233,377 )
Net income for the year   $ 15,344,502     $ (497,847 )   $ 332,121     $ 298,277     $ (24,719 )   $ 15,452,334  

 

    Year ended December 31, 2010  
    Exploration &
Production
    Refining
Activities
    Transportation     Market and
Supply
    Eliminations     Total  
                                     
Revenues:                                                
Local sales   $ 1,423,709     $ 14,166,202     $ 2,521,184     $ 955,576     $ (860,812 )   $ 18,205,859  
Foreign sales, net     13,629,198       5,641,545       717       8,163,371       (3,550,945 )     23,883,886  
Inter-segment net operating revenues     9,032,898       1,024,563       1,186,659       47,061       (11,291,181 )     -  
Total Revenue     24,085,805       20,832,310       3,708,560       9,166,008       (15,702,938 )     42,089,745  
Cost of sales     6,990,223       20,421,756       1,552,292       8,542,971       (15,522,533 )     21,984,709  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization     2,759,835       487,911       727,970       31       -       3,975,747  
Selling and projects     2,116,028       422,704       90,057       149,529       -       2,778,318  
Administration expenses     242,717       184,420       164,985       11,401       -       603,523  
Costs and expenses     12,108,803       21,516,791       2,535,304       8,703,932       (15,522,533 )     29,342,297  
Operating income     11,977,002       (684,481 )     1,173,256       462,076       (180,405 )     12,747,448  
Financial income (expenses), net     115,361       (55,244 )     983       (7,242 )     (16,069 )     37,789  
Pension expenses     (157,035 )     (171,547 )     (48,706 )     (338 )     -       (377,626 )
Other non-operating income (expenses)     (463,171 )     (146,601 )     (178,391 )     (126,831 )     -       (914,994 )
Other expenses, net     (504,845 )     (373,392 )     (226,114 )     (134,411 )     (16,069 )     (1,254,831 )
Income before income taxes and non-controlling     11,472,157       (1,057,873 )     947,142       327,665       (196,474 )     11,492,617  
Income tax benefit (expense)     (3,127,944 )     266,997       (294,616 )     (83,087 )     -       (3,238,650 )
Non-Controlling interest     -       403       (107,899 )     -       -       (107,496 )
Net income for the year   $ 8,344,213     $ (790,473 )   $ 544,627     $ 244,578     $ (196,474 )   $ 8,146,471  

 

F- 91
 

 

The following tables illustrate sales by geographic zones:

 

Sales by geographic zones for the year ended December 31, 2012

 

Zone   Products   Value     Participation  
Colombia*   Crude oil, Refined, Petrochemicals and natural gas   $ 24,447,603       35.5 %
United States of America   Crude oil, Refined and Petrochemicals     24,721,340       35.9 %
Asia   Crude oil, Refined and Petrochemicals     7,201,295       10.5 %
Africa   Refined and Petrochemicals     330,775       0.5 %
Europe   Crude oil, Refined and Petrochemicals     3,977,682       5.8 %
South America   Crude oil, Refined, Petrochemicals and natural gas     1,791,111       2.6 %
Central America and Caribbean   Crude oil, Refined and Petrochemicals     6,213,770       9.0 %
Other   Petrochemicals     168,426       0.2 %
        $ 68,852,002       100.0 %

*Includes sales to free trade by $85,690

 

Sales by geographic zones December 31, 2011

 

Zone   Products   Value     Participation  
Colombia*   Crude oil, Refined, Petrochemicals and natural gas   $ 23,659,990       35.9 %
United States of America   Crude oil, Refined and Petrochemicals     27,450,466       41.6 %
Asia   Crude oil, Refined and Petrochemicals     4,351,492       6.6 %
Africa   Refined and Petrochemicals     140,512       0.2 %
South America   Crude oil, Refined, Petrochemicals and natural gas     2,458,953       3.7 %
Central America and Caribbean   Crude oil, Refined and Petrochemicals     5,054,208       7.7 %
Europe   Crude oil, Refined and Petrochemicals     2,768,359       4.2 %
Other   Petrochemicals     83,534       0.1 %
        $ 65,967,514       100.0 %

*Includes sales to free trade zone of $105,361

 

Sales by geographic zones December 31, 2010

 

Zone   Products   Value     Participation  
Colombia*   Crude oil, Refined, Petrochemicals and natural gas   $ 18,350,593       43.6 %
United States of America   Crude oil, Refined and Petrochemicals     14,965,911       35.6 %
Asia   Crude oil, Refined and Petrochemicals     3,952,186       9.4 %
South America   Crude oil, Refined, Petrochemicals and natural gas     1,031,808       2.5 %
Central America and Caribbean   Crude oil, Refined and Petrochemicals     2,311,529       5.5 %
Europe   Crude oil, Refined and Petrochemicals     1,431,301       3.4 %
Other   Petrochemicals     46,417       0.1 %
        $ 42,089,745       100.0 %

*Includes sales to free trade zone of $144,734

 

The following tables illustrate sales of products by segment:

 

Sales of products by segment December 31, 2012

 

Local Sales   Exploration
&
Production
    Refining
Activities
    Transportation     Market and
Supply
    Eliminations     Total  
Medium distillates   $ 1,839     $ 10,304,092     $ -     $ 827,048     $ -     $ 11,132,979  
Gasolines     -       5,662,568       -       34,610       -       5,697,178  
Crude oil     842,975       -       -       -       (19,784 )     823,191  
Other products     126,445       1,162,728       -       11,891       (70,299 )     1,230,765  
Services     179,731       4,949       2,879,341       44,523       (1,028,676 )     2,079,868  
Natural gas     1,188,966       -       -       203,923       (10,493 )     1,382,396  
L.P.G.     160,968       350,881       -       -       (19,409 )     492,440  
Diesel and gasoline subsidies     -       809,773       -       -       -       809,773  
Plastic and rubber     91       713,232       -       -       -       713,323  
Total local sales   $ 2,501,015     $ 19,008,223     $ 2,879,341     $ 1,121,995     $ (1,148,661 )   $ 24,361,913  

 

F- 92
 

 

Foreign Sales   Exploration &
Production
    Refining
Activities
    Transportation     Market and
Supply
    Eliminations     Total  
                                     
Crude oil   $ 26,026,622     $ -     $ -     $ 15,102,638     $ (5,244,725 )   $ 35,884,535  
Fuel oil     -       4,283,814       -       -       -       4,283,814  
Gasolines     -       882,650       -       299,717       -       1,182,367  
Diesel     -       1,216,213       -       -       -       1,216,213  
L.P.G     2,968       48,539       -       -       -       51,507  
Natural gas     555,813       -       -       50,198       (42,599 )     563,412  
Plastic and rubber     -       754,648       -       -       -       754,648  
 Other products and services     22,197       531,184       591       97       (476 )     553,593  
Total foreign sales   $ 26,607,600     $ 7,717,048     $ 591     $ 15,452,650     $ (5,287,800 )   $ 44,490,089  

 

Sales of products by Segment December 31, 2011

 

Local Sales   Exploration
&
Production
    Refining
Activities
    Transportation     Market and
Supply
    Eliminations     Total  
Medium distillates   $ 6,141     $ 9,045,328     $ -     $ 690,877     $ -     $ 9,742,346  
Gasolines     -       5,185,831       -       21,042       -       5,206,873  
Crude oil     460,591       -       -       -       (14,886 )     445,705  
Other products     63,979       1,086,384       -       9,117       -       1,159,480  
Services     52,218       6,850       2,547,156       58,167       (877,747 )     1,786,644  
Natural gas     1,093,079       -       -       334,441       (8,413 )     1,419,107  
L.P.G.     53,115       671,041       -       2,955       -       727,111  
Diesel and gasoline subsidies     -       2,251,322       -       -       -       2,251,322  
Plastic and rubber     -       816,041       -       -       -       816,041  
Total local sales   $ 1,729,123     $ 19,062,797     $ 2,547,156     $ 1,116,599     $ (901,046 )   $ 23,554,629  

 

Foreign Sales   Exploration &
Production
    Refining
Activities
    Transportation     Market and
Supply
    Eliminations     Total  
                                     
Crude oil   $ 24,039,881     $ -     $ -     $ 14,790,487     $ (5,412,176 )   $ 33,418,192  
Fuel oil     -       4,447,657       -       -       -       4,447,657  
Gasolines     -       1,484,245       -       178,976       -       1,663,221  
Diesel     -       1,482,625       -       -       -       1,482,625  
Natural gas     381,000       -       -       173,540       (46,474 )     508,066  
Plastic and rubber     -       804,835       -       -       -       804,835  
Other products     22,264       184,199       806       413       (119,393 )     88,289  
Total foreign sales   $ 24,443,145     $ 8,403,561     $ 806     $ 15,143,416     $ (5,578,043 )   $ 42,412,885  

 

Sales of products by segment for the year ended December 31, 2010

 

Local Sales   Exploration &
Production
    Refining
Activities
    Transportation     Market and
Supply
    Eliminations     Total  
Medium distillates   $ 5,058     $ 6,588,097     $ -     $ 506,021     $ -     $ 7,099,176  
Gasolines     -       4,324,551       -       -       (22,269 )     4,302,282  
Crude oil     245,231       -       -       -       (6,611 )     238,620  
Other products     189,833       1,214,831       -       16,124       (68 )     1,420,720  
Services     97,350       32,546       2,521,184       54,492       (757,743 )     1,947,829  
Natural gas     854,427       -       -       378,939       (74,121 )     1,159,245  
L.P.G.     31,810       595,551       -       -       -       627,361  
Diesel and gasoline subsidies     -       740,682       -       -       -       740,682  
Plastic and rubber     -       669,944       -       -       -       669,944  
Total local sales   $ 1,423,709     $ 14,166,202     $ 2,521,184     $ 955,576     $ (860,812 )   $ 18,205,859  

 

F- 93
 

  

Foreign Sales   Exploration &
Production
    Refining
Activities
    Transportation     Market and
Supply
    Eliminations     Total  
                                     
Crude oil   $ 13,515,877     $ -     $ -     $ 8,108,425     $ (3,550,945 )   $ 18,073,357  
Fuel oil     -       2,377,266       -       -       -       2,377,266  
Gasoline     -       687,984       -       10,084       -       698,068  
Diesel     -       1,638,044       -       -       -       1,638,044  
Natural gas     101,363       -       -       44,700       -       146,063  
Plastic and rubber     -       673,574       -       -       -       673,574  
Other products     11,958       264,677       717       162       -       277,514  
Total foreign sales   $ 13,629,198     $ 5,641,545     $ 717     $ 8,163,371     $ (3,550,945 )   $ 23,883,886  

 

NOTE: Certain amounts of the consolidated financial statements of December 2011 and December 2010 were reclassified for presentation purposes consistent with those of December 31, 2012.

 

xxvii. RELATED PARTIES

 

The Company is majority owned by Colombian Government, so other state-owned companies and governmental entities are considered to be related parties. In addition to those transactions disclosed in Note 16 of statutory financial statements and those included in Item 7, numerous transactions with these entities exist. The most significant of them are disclosed below.

 

Fuel subsidy: Selling prices of regular motor gasoline and diesel are regulated by government. However a subsidy is granted to producers to compensate the difference between selling price and U.S. Gulf reference market price. The amount received by the Company in 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $809,773, $2,251,322 and $740,682, respectively. In addition, in 2010, the Company recognized interests amounting to $929 regarding subsidies recorded.

 

Purchases of hydrocarbons from ANH: The Company purchases the physical product that the ANH receives from all producers in Colombia at prices set forth by Law 756 of 2002 and Resolution 18-1709 of 2003, which references international prices. For more information on this transaction, please see Notes 1(s), 16 and 25.

 

The Company also paid in kind royalties over certain fields as set forth in Law 141 of 1994, the Administrative Agreement of Collaborative Collection of Liquid Hydrocarbon Royalties signed on September 16, 2010, with the ANH, and Decree 4923 of 2011. The quantities of oil and gas paid as in-kind royalties to the ANH for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010 were 54,095,846 boe, 59,059,539 boe and 52,518,111 boe, respectively.

 

The following tables present consolidated accounts receivable, payable as well as revenues and expenses with related parties of the Company as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

 

    2012     2011  
    Assets     Liabilities     Assets     Liabilities  
Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales   $ 3,117,918     $ 1,059,565     $ 2,224,871     $ 1,763,035  
Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público     3,183,910       4,201,048       1,367,554       108  
E.S.P. Empresa de Energia de Bogotá S.A.     801,496       -       741,724       -  
Interconexion Electrica S.A.     565,759       79       662,499       -  
Entidades Territoriales (Departments, Municipalities)     57,170       46,198       46,034       35,840  
E.S.P. Generadora y Comerc.de Energia del Caribe     17,049       330       19,749       1,299  
Isagen S.A.     10,495       5,979       9,286       7,694  
Empresas Públicas de Medellín     6,714       5,630       13,813       2  
E.S.P. Transportadora de Gas Internacional S.A.     2,459       -       857       -  
Electrificadora del Meta S. A. -E.S.P.     2,369       1       1,701       -  
Universidad Industrial de Santander     34       4,705       27       -  
Banco Agrario de Colombia     17       184,785       18       177,136  
Fiduciaria Agraria S. A.     -       7,761       -       -  
CAR del Rio Grande de la Magdalena     -       6,330       -       -  
Universidad Pedagogica y Tecnologica de Colombia     -       5,791       -       -  
Other     919       19,455       56,285       5,277  
    $ 7,766,309     $ 5,547,657     $ 5,144,418     $ 1,990,391  

 

F- 94
 

 

Other transactions with related parties during 2012, 2011 and 2010 are:

 

    2012     2011     2010  
    Income     Expenses     Income     Expenses     Income     Expenses  
Direccion de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales   $ -     $ 16,563     $ -     $ 706,206     $ 1     $ 3,523,700  
U.A.E. Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos     1,158       213,974       141       15       3,913       2,524  
Contraloria General de la Republica     -       64,519       -       55,082       -       52,876  
Entidades Territoriales (Departments, Municipalities)     1       59,313       233       60,005       1,328       30,986  
Banco Agrario de Colombia     -       20,696       -       15,392       -       -  
Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar     -       6,892       -       6,761       -       4,472  
Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público     616       196,404       2       883       -       792  
Empresas Públicas de Medellín     19,220       -       96,373       2,281       -       -  
Isagen S.A.     3,194       -       113,447       230       46,236       17,930  
E.S.P. Generadora y Comercializadora de Energia del Caribe S.A.     11       -       165,828       -       -       -  
Military Forces – Republic of Colombia     -       225,019       -       -       -       -  
Other     156       42,975       35,676       35,008       326,687       26,186  
    $ 24,356     $ 846,355     $ 411,700     $ 881,863     $ 378,165     $ 3,659,466  

 

xxviii. FAIR VALUE

 

Accounting standards for fair value measurement (ASC 820) establish a framework for measuring fair value and stipulate disclosures about fair value measurements. The standards apply to recurring and nonrecurring financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities that require or permit fair-value measurements. Among the required disclosures is the fair-value hierarchy of inputs the Company uses to value an asset or a liability. The three levels of the fair-value hierarchy are described as follows:

 

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. For the Company, Level 1 inputs include marketable securities that are actively traded.

 

Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that is observable, either directly or indirectly. For the Company, Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets, prices obtained through third-party broker quotes, and prices that can be corroborated with other observable inputs for substantially the complete term of a contract.

 

Level 3: Unobservable inputs - The Company does not use Level 3 inputs for any of its recurring fair-value measurements. Level 3 inputs may be required for the determination of fair value associated with certain nonrecurring measurements of nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The Company uses Level 3 inputs to determine the fair value of certain nonrecurring nonfinancial assets.

 

The fair value hierarchy for recurring assets measured at fair value at December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, is as follows:

 

          Fair Value at Reporting Date Using           Fair Value at Reporting Date Using  
          Quoted Price
 in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
    Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
    Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
          Quoted Price
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
    Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
    Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
Description   2012     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     2011     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
ASSETS                                                                
Available for sale debt securities                                                                
Securities issued by mixed – economy governmental entities   $ 1,367,179     $ 1,367,179     $ -     $ -     $ 1,401,505     $ 1,401,505     $ -     $ -  
Securities issued or secured by Colombian government     3,001,374       3,000,260       1,114       -       1,303,145       1,303,145       -       -  
Securities issued or secured by government sponsored enterprise (GSEs)     1,637,914       1,637,914       -       -       2,148,727       2,148,727       -       -  
Securities issued or secured by financial entities     216,046       59,759       156,287       -       552,857       361,653       191,204       -  
Other debt securities     660,634       660,634       -       -       279,528       279,528       -       -  
Securities issued or secured by USA government     44,265       44,265       -       -       700,237       700,237       -       -  
Total available for sale debt securities     6,927,412       6,770,011       157,401       -       6,385,999       6,194,795       191,204       -  
Derivatives                             -                                  
Option     4,543       -       4,543       -       (2,370 )     -       (2,370 )     -  
Swap     -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -  
FX Forward     -       -       -       -       14       -       14       -  
Total derivatives     4,543               4,543       -       (2,356 )     -       (2,356 )     -  
Total Recurring Assets at fair value   $ 6,931,955     $ 6,770,011     $ 161,944     $ -     $ 6,383,643     $ 6,194,795     $ 188,848     $ -  

 

Marketable Securities: The Company calculates fair value for its marketable securities based on quoted market prices for identical assets and liabilities. The fair values reflect the cash that would have been received if the instruments were sold at December 31, 2012.

 

Derivatives: The Company records its derivative instruments on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value, with the offsetting amount to the Consolidated Statement of Income. For derivatives with identical or similar provisions as contracts that are publicly traded on a regular basis, the Company uses the market values of the publicly traded instruments as an input for fair-value calculations.

 

F- 95
 

 

The Company’s derivative instruments principally include foreign exchange and refined-product (asphalt) swaps, options and forward contracts, principally with financial institutions and other oil and gas companies, the fair values for which are obtained from third-party broker quotes, industry pricing services and exchanges.

 

The Company obtains multiple sources of pricing information for the Level 2 instruments. Since this pricing information is generated from observable market data, it has historically been very consistent. The Company does not materially adjust this information.

 

The fair value hierarchy for non-recurring assets measured at fair value at December 31, 2012 is as follows:

 

          Fair Value Measurements Using        
Description   2012     Quoted Price
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets Level 1
    Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Level 2
    Significant
Unobservable
Inputs Level 3
    Total Gains
(Losses)
    2011  
Goodwill   $ 1,264,470     $ -     $ -     $ 1,264,470     $ -     $ 1,388,568  
Production fixed assets with impairment     189,294       -       -       189,294       (80,242 )     144,106  
Transportation fixed assets with impairment (*)     -       -       -       -       (195,903 )     -  
Other fixed assets     34,311,563       -       -       34,311,563       -       15,389,893  
Total Fixed Assets   $ 34,500,857     $ -     $ -     $ 34,500,857     $ (276,145 )   $ 15,533,999  
Total Non-Recurring Assets   $ 35,765,327     $ -     $ -     $ 35,765,327     $ (276,145 )   $ 16,922,567  

 

* Transportation fixed assets were written down to their fair value of $0 in 2011 and 2012, resulting in an impairment charge of ($41,043), under U.S. GAAP, in 2011 and ($195,903) in 2012.

 

Impairment of “Goodwill”- During 2011 in accordance with the accounting standard for Intangibles – Goodwill Impairment Test (ASC 350 - 20), the Goodwill in Propilco with a carrying amount of $694,388 was written down to a fair value of $647,697, resulting in a before-tax loss of $46,691. The fair value was determined from internal cash-flow models, using discount rates consistent with those used by the Company to evaluate cash flows of other assets of a similar nature. In 2012 there is no impairment according to our analysis.

 

Impairment of “Properties, plant and equipment” and “Natural and environmental Resources” - During 2012 and in accordance with the accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets (ASC 360), long-lived assets “held and used” with a carrying amount of $34,777,002 were written down to a fair value of $34,500,857, resulting in a before-tax loss of $276,145. The fair values were determined from internal cash-flow models, using discount rates consistent with those used by the Company to evaluate cash flows of other assets of a similar nature. The respective long-lived assets were reviewed for impairment on a field-by-field basis.

 

Assets and liabilities not required to be measured at fair value

 

The Company holds cash and cash equivalents. The instruments held are primarily time deposits and money market funds. The fair values reflect the cash that would have been received or paid if the instruments were settled at year-end. Cash equivalents had carrying/fair values of $7,972,335 and $7,073,550 at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Fair values of other financial instruments at the end of 2012 and 2011 were not material.

 

The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and accounts receivables. The carrying value of cash and accounts receivable reflects management’s assessment of credit risk. As of December 31, 2011 and 2012, cash and cash equivalents includes balances in savings and checking accounts, as well as term deposits and certificates of deposit, placed primarily with governments and financial institutions with strong investment grade ratings.

 

Fair value of financial instruments: The estimated fair value amounts presented below have been determined by the Company using available market information or other appropriate valuation methodologies that require considerable judgment in developing and interpreting the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

 

The carrying amounts of the Company’s accounts receivable, accounts payable and current notes payable approximate fair value because they have relatively short-term maturities and bear interest at rates tied to market indicators, as appropriate. The Company’s long-term debt consists of debt instruments that bear interest at fixed or variable rates tied to market indicators.

 

F- 96
 

 

The carrying amount and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments that are not recognized in the balance sheets at fair value as of December 31 are as follows:

 

    2012           2011        
Description   Carrying
Amount
    Estimated Fair
Value
    Fair
Value
Hierarchy
    Carrying
Amount
    Estimated
Fair Value
    Fair
Value
Hierarchy
 
Long-term notes payable   $ 9,600,559     $ 9,521,801       Level 2     $ 4,724,355     $ 4,726,610        Level 2  
Long-term debt (including current portion):   $ 4,154,087     $ 4,987,654       Level 1     $ 4,009,178     $ 4,624,413       Level 1  
Total   $ 13,754,646     $ 14,509,455             $ 8,733,533     $ 9,351,023          

 

xxix. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)

 

In accordance with the requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Accounting Standards Codification 932 and the ASU- 2010-03 “Oil and Gas reserve Estimation and Disclosures” Rule, this section provides supplemental information on oil and gas exploration and producing activities of the Company. The information included in items (i) through (iii) provides historical cost information pertaining to costs incurred in exploration, property acquisitions and development, capitalized costs and results of operations. The information included in items (iv) and (v) presents information on Ecopetrol’s estimated net proved reserve quantities, standardized measure of estimated discounted future net cash flows related to proved reserves, and changes in estimated discounted future net cash flows.

 

The following information corresponds to Ecopetrol’s oil and gas producing activities at December 31 2012, 2011 and 2010 in direct and joint operations.

 

Under the SEC final rule, optional disclosure of possible and probable reserves is allowed. But, the Company opted not to do so. Ecopetrol estimated its reserves without considering non-traditional resources.

 

Table i – Capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities

 

    Year ended December 31  
    2012     2011     2010  
Natural and environmental properties   $ 25,836,787     $ 21,795,716     $ 16,977,248  
Wells, equipment and facilities – property, plant and equipment     10,045,169       8,460,137       6,564,590  
Construction in progress     5,841,384       4,912,199       2,490,365  
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization     (18,802,677 )     (15,850,932 )     (11,864,137 )
Net capitalized costs   $ 22,920,663     $ 19,317,120     $ 14,168,066  

 

It includes information of the exploration and production segment subsidiaries.

 

In accordance with ASC 410-20, these natural and environmental costs include the asset retirement obligations amounting $80,244, $79,930 and $30,748, during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively

 

Table ii – Costs incurred in oil and gas exploration and development activities

 

Costs incurred are summarized below and include both amounts expensed and capitalized in the corresponding period.

 

    Year ended December 31  
    2012     2011     2010  
Acquisition of proved properties (1)   $ -     $ 1,483,891       -  
Acquisition of unproved properties (2)     67,016       336,824       -  
Exploration costs     1,676,821       1,562,147       1,598,276  
Development costs     9,204,629       8,875,850       5,835,141  
Total costs incurred   $ 10,948,466     $ 12,258,712     $ 7,433,417  

 

(1) Includes wells, equipment and facilities associated with Equion.

 

(2) Represents the scheduled buy-in costs paid to Murphy Oil (Operator) to participate in the Dalmation project in 2012, and wells, equipment and facilities associated with Caño Sur in 2011.

 

F- 97
 

 

Table iii Results of operations for oil and gas producing activities

 

    2012     2011     2010  
Net revenues                        
Sales   $ 29,515,227     $ 26,222,068     $ 15,245,110  
Transfers     12,980,714       13,558,328       9,032,898  
Total   $ 42,495,941     $ 39,780,396     $ 24,278,008  
                         
Production cost (1)     5,361,603       4,879,884       3,577,780  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (2)     3,365,845       2,622,867       1,856,118  
Other production costs (3)     6,502,268       5,486,537       3,554,315  
Exploration expenses (4)     1,392,834       1,149,937       1,696,383  
Other expenses (5)     1,369,032       1,078,564       593,257  
Total     17,991,582       15,217,789       11,277,853  
Income before income tax     24,504,359       24,562,607       13,000,155  
Income tax expenses     (8,064,384 )     (8,105,660 )     (4,290,051 )
Results of operations for producing activities   $ 16,439,975     $ 16,456,947     $ 8,710,104  

 

Note: Effects of naphtha addition are included into results of operations in the table above. During 2012, 2011 and 2010 the additional total barrels (million boe) were 19.4, 15.4 and 12.2.

 

(1) Production costs are lifting costs incurred to operate and maintain productive wells and related equipment and facilities, including costs such as operating labor, materials, supplies, and fuel consumed in operations and the costs of operating natural gas liquids plants. In addition includes accretion expense related to the asset retirement obligations that were recognized during 2012, 2011 and 2010 amounting approximately $150,754, $ 133,796 and $ 151,516 respectively. The Company’s results of operations from oil and gas producing activities for the years ending December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are shown above.

 

(2) In accordance with ASC 410-20, the expense related to asset retirement obligations that were recognized during 2012, 2011 and 2010 in depreciation, depletion and amortization amounted approximately to $131,342, $28,676 and $180,484 respectively.

 

(3) Corresponds to transportation costs and naphtha that are not part of the Company´s lifting cost.

 

(4) Exploration expenses include the costs of geological and geophysical activities as well as the non-productive exploratory wells.

 

(5) Corresponds to administration and marketing expenses.

 

During 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, the Company transferred approximately 31%, 34% and 37% of its crude oil and gas production; (percentages based on the value sales in Colombian pesos) to intercompany business units. Base on volume, those transfers were 39%, 42% and 47% respectively (including Reficar). The intercompany transfers were recorded at values equal to the Company’s market prices.

 

Table iv – Reserve information

 

The reserve information presented in this section is based on the definitions and rules used for U.S. GAAP purposes. The estimates for proved oil and gas reserves used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements were prepared by Ecopetrol’s engineers, audited in a 99% by the “external engineers”.

 

Reserves are first estimated internally. This process is supervised and coordinated by the corporate manager of reservoirs, a geologist who holds a master’s degree in geology and has more than 20 years of experience in projects associated with reservoir characterization and development, estimation, and reporting of reserves. The employees involved in the reserves process meet the Society of Petroleum Engineers, or SPE, qualifications for reserves estimators. Internally estimated reserves are submitted to an external audit process, which was conducted by the External Engineers (Ryder Scott, DeGolyer and MacNaughton and Gaffney, Cline & Associates). These firms have audited 99% of our total net proved reserves for 2012, 2011, and 2010. According to our corporate policy, we report the reserves values obtained from the External Engineers.

 

The reserves process ends when the Reserves Directorate consolidates the results and present them to the Reserves Committee, whose members are the Chief Financial Officer, the Exploration and Production Executive Vice-President and the Vice-President of Strategy. Finally, results are presented to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and approved by the Board of Directors.

 

Information concerning the technical definitions used for the estimated proved reserves is included in this annual report. The information provided in this annual report about our 2012 net proved reserves is based on the 2012 audited reserve reports for 99% of our total reserves prepared by experts under the SEC definitions and rules. The remaining 1% corresponds to calculations made by us internally using SEC definitions and rules set forth in Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X and the disclosure guidelines contained in the SEC’s “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting” final rule dated December 31, 2008 and effective as of January 1, 2010.

 

F- 98
 

 

Our 2012 crude oil and natural gas net proved reserves include reserves from production assets located in the United States, Perú and Colombia regarding the Hocol and Equion’s assets.

 

The Company’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are based on the SEC average price methodology for U.S. GAAP purposes, which mirrors the average price methodology used by the Company in Colombia during this period.

 

Future development, abandonment and production costs were computed by estimating the expenditures to be incurred in developing, producing, and abandoning proved oil and gas reserves at the end of the year, based on year-end costs. Future income taxes were computed by applying statutory tax rates to the estimated net pre-tax cash flows after consideration of tax basis and tax credits and carry forwards. Discounted future net cash flows are calculated using 10% mid period discount factors. This discounting requires a year-by-year estimate of when the future expenditures will be incurred and when the reserves will be produced.

 

The arbitrary valuation methodology prescribed under ASU 2010-03 and ASU-2010-14 requires assumptions as to the timing and amount of future development and production costs. The calculations are made as of December 31 each year and should not be relied upon as an indication of the Company’s future cash flows or the value of its oil and gas reserves.

 

Ecopetrol used deterministic methods that are commonly used internationally to estimate reserves. These methods have some uncertainty in degradation, and thus, the estimates should not be interpreted as being exact amounts. However, the technology used to estimate reserves is considered reliable.

 

Estimates of reserves were prepared by geological and engineering methods commonly used in the oil industry. The method or combination of methods used in the analysis of each reserve was adopted from experience with similar reserves, stage of development, quality and completeness of basic data and production history.

 

The majority of the producing proved reserves were estimated by applying appropriate decline curves or other performance relationships. In analyzing decline curves, reserves were estimated by calculating economic limits that are based on current economic conditions. In certain cases, where the methods previously employed could not be used, reserves were estimated by analogy with similar reserves where more complete data was available.

 

Most of the Company’s activities and reserves are located in Colombia. The Colombian Nation is the owner of all mineral interests located in Colombia. The Company and, by extension of joint association contracts, its partners, are given the right to explore, develop, produce and sell those reserves, but do not own them. The reserve quantities and their standardized measure, presented in the following tables, represent those reserves and their estimated value that the Company has the right to extract and sell.

 

The information provided does not represent management’s estimate of the Company’s expected future cash flows or value of proved oil and gas reserves. Estimates of proved reserve quantities involve uncertainty and change over time as new information becomes available.

 

The table below sets forth the Company’s total proved oil and gas reserves together with their changes therein as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. The estimates (oil in million barrels, gas in billion cf, gas converted to million barrels at 5.7 billion cf per million barrels) using the SEC rules in effect for each respective year.

 

The following is the reserve quantity information:

 

    2012     2011     2010  
    Oil     Gas     Total     Oil     Gas     Total     Oil     Gas     Total  
    million
barrels
    billion
cf
    million
boe
    million
barrels
    billion
cf
    million
boe
    million
barrels
    billion
cf
    million
boe
 
Proved Reserves:                                                                        
Beginning of year     1,371.0       2,768.4       1,856.7       1,236.4       2,722.6       1,714.0       1,123.3       2,329.4       1,538.2  
Revisions of previous estimates     42.7       8.8       44.2       107.6       (260.8 )     61.8       99.1       558.7       190.9  
Improved recovery     65.3       -       65.3       14.8       3.6       15.4       47.4       -       47.4  
Purchases of minerals in place     -       -       -       18.3       93.3       34.6       -       -       -  
Extensions and discoveries     90.4       298.6       142.8       184.5       386.2       252.3       126.3       0.3       126.5  
Production     (199.2 )     (189.3 )     (232.4 )     (190.5 )     (176.5 )     (221.5 )     (159.8 )     (165.9 )     (188.9 )
End of year     1,370.3       2,886.4       1,876.7       1,371.0       2,768.4       1,856.7       1,236.4       2,722.6       1,714.0  
                                                                         
Proved developed reserves:                                                                        
Beginning of year     855.8       2,229.5       1,246.9       800.7       2,261.7       1,197.5       630.5       1,732.6       939.0  
End of year     933.3       2,535.9       1,378.2       855.8       2,229.5       1,246.9       800.7       2,261.7       1,197.5  
Proved undeveloped reserves:                                                                        
Beginning of year     515.2       538.9       609.8       435.6       460.9       516.5       492.8       596.9       599.2  
End of year     437.0       350.6       498.5       515.2       538.9       609.8       435.6       460.9       516.5  

 

F- 99
 

 

The Company’s revisions, on a consolidated basis, during 2012 amounted to 44.2 million boe, corresponding primarily to the following:

 

· Pauto Field: Sales natural gas liquids , or NGL volumes associated with our gas processing plant , better production performance, and new development projects focused in gas conversion activities and drilling, representing a 19.4 million boe increase.
· Caño Limon Field: Better production performance representing a 13.9 million boe increase

 

The revisions described above represented 75% of the additions to reserves revisions in 2012, while the revisions with respect to the remaining 10.9 million boe resulted from varying increases and decreases from a variety of fields like Apiay, Quifa and others.

 

The Company’s improved recovery during 2012 amounted to 65.3 million boe, which corresponded mainly to new proved areas under waterflooding in the La Cira-Infantas, Casabe and Tibu fields.

 

The Company’s extensions and discoveries during 2012 amounted to 142.8 million boe, which corresponded to 16.2 million boe of newly discovered fields and 126.6 million boe of extensions of proved acreage. The newly discovered fields corresponded mainly to Ecopetrol S.A.’s Cajua, Chipiron fields Hocol’s Mamey-Bonga fields and Ecopetrol America’s Dalmatian field.

 

In terms of extensions of proved acreage (126.6 million boe), 70% was associated with activities in the followings fields:

 

25.5 million boe related to the Castilla Field where the company´s plan is to perform additional drilling activities in order to cover new proved areas, 47.8 million boe was associated with new sales agreements enabling increases the future gas sales in the Cupiagua field and 15.4 million boe related to new proved areas in the Quifa and Chichimene fields. The remaining 30% is distributed in smaller changes in several Company fields.

 

The remaining 30% is distributed in smaller changes in several Company fields.

 

Table v – Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas quantities and changes therein

 

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, related to the above proved crude oil and natural gas reserves, is calculated in accordance with the requirements of ASU 2010-03. Estimated future cash inflows from production under U.S. GAAP are computed by applying unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month for oil and gas price to year-end quantities of estimated net proved reserves.

 

    2012     2011     2010  
Future cash inflows   $ 251,891,162     $ 251,939,319     $ 186,295,426  
Future production and development costs     (81,405,039 )     (87,262,683 )     (57,267,518 )
Future income tax expenses     (55,445,509 )     (56,743,761 )     (36,783,230 )
Future net cash flow     115,040,614       107,932,875       92,244,678  
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows     (42,457,937 )     (38,932,148 )     (36,690,043 )
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows   $ 72,582,677     $ 69,000,727     $ 55,554,635  

 

The following are the principal sources of change in the standardized measure of discounted net cash flows:

 

    2012     2011     2010  
                   
Net change in sales and transfer prices and in production (lifting) cost related to future production   $ 8,921,835     $ 21,725,178     $ 23,136,538  
Changes in estimated future development costs     2,092,588       (3,602,471 )     (2,936,160 )
Sales and transfer of oil and gas produced during the period     (37,134,338 )     (34, 900,512 )       (24,278,008 )
Net change due to extension discoveries     2,370,545       9,500,676       4,102,951  
Net change due to purchase and sales of minerals in place     -       1,239,446       -  
Net change due to revisions in quantity estimates     3,017,004       3,912,856       10,577,037  
Previously estimated development costs incurred during the period     5,928,223       8,265,106       4,352,080  
Accretion of discount     10,527,661       7,770,745       3,545,989  
Timing and other     6,564,830       13,658,144       6,674,884  
Net change in income taxes     1,293,602       (14,123,076 )     (5,080,563 )
Aggregate change in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows for the year   $ 3,581,950     $ 13,446,092     $ 20,094,748  

 

F- 100

 

Exhibit 4.2

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT TO

 

TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT

 

BETWEEN

 

OLEODUCTO CENTRAL S.A.

OCENSA

 

AND

 

ECOPETROL S.A.

 

 

 

1
 

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT TO

TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT

DATED MARCH 31, 1995

 

The undersigned, OLEODUCTO CENTRAL S.A., a company legally organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Colombia, with its principal place of business in the city of Bogotá D.C., represented in this transaction by OSCAR TRUJILLO, identified as it appears below his signature and duly authorized to enter into this Supplementary Agreement, as one party (the “Carrier”), and ECOPETROL S.A., a company legally organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Colombia, with its principal place of business in the city of Bogotá D.C., represented in this transaction by PEDRO ROSALES NAVARRO, identified as it appears below his signature and duly authorized to enter into this supplementary agreement to the Contract, as the other party ( the “Original Shipper” and, together with the Carrier, the “Parties”), have agreed to enter into this supplementary agreement based upon the following:

 

RECITALS

 

A.          WHEREAS the Original Shipper signed a transportation agreement, dated March 31, 1995, with the Carrier (the “Contract”), and an additional 10.098% carrying capacity through the Pipeline was transferred to it by virtue of the assignment by Ecopetrol Oil & Gas Investments on November 26, 2012 subsequent to the assignment to the latter on November 2, 2012 by Equion Energía Limited;

 

B.            WHEREAS the Transportation Agreement has undergone the following modifications, among others: (i) Supplement to Transportation Agreement of September 10, 1999, for the purpose of modifying the definition of “Shares” on the occasion of the conversion of shares by the Carrier, (ii) VAT Funding Agreement of February 2006, (iii) Letter Agreement of December 19, 2008 as modified from time to time, pursuant to which the time period and other conditions for the payment of monthly invoices by the Original Shipper are established, (iv) Agreement of October 13, 2009 among the shareholders of the Carrier, the Carrier and the Original Shippers for expansion of capacity of the system, (v) Agreement of October 13, 2009 among the shareholders of the Carrier, the Carrier and the Original shippers for release of capacity, as modified pursuant to amendment of December 11, 2009, (vi) Amendment to Transportation Agreement, governing matters related to the tariff applicable to Deliveries at the Coveñas Terminal in 2012 and thereafter, and (vii) Amendment of January 15, 2011, documenting modification with respect to minimum quality specifications required for delivery of Oil via the Pipeline;

 

C.           WHEREAS the Parties wish to modify certain provisions of the Contract on the terms hereinafter set forth;

 

D.           WHEREAS at the date hereof, by virtue of this Contract and in view of the payments and investments made for the construction and operation of the Pipeline, the Original Shipper is entitled to a Contracted Capacity of 70.098% of the Effective Capacity of the Pipeline. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon execution of this Amendment and from the date of the First Nomination (hereinafter defined), the Contracted Capacity of the Original Shipper will move from being a percentage of Effective Capacity to a specific number of Barrels;

 

2
 

 

E.            WHEREAS the Parties understand that the Effective Capacity that exceeds the sum total of the Contracted Capacity of the Original Shippers at the date of this amendment shall be Available Capacity that the Carrier shall have the authority to commercialize;

 

F.            WHEREAS the mutual intent of the Parties is neither to novate nor to replace the relationship arising from the Contract with a new relationship;

 

G.            WHEREAS in accordance with Resolution 181258 of 2010 of the Ministry of Mines and Energy (the “Resolution”) companies that provide Oil transportation services via the pipeline must have a Carrier Manual;

 

H.           WHEREAS the Carrier Manual governs a number of the administrative and operational matters included in the Contract in accordance with the Resolution;

 

I.             WHEREAS the Resolution acknowledges the validity, existence and duration of contracts executed prior to its issuance; and

 

J.           WHEREAS the Parties have decided to integrate and consolidate the original text of the Contract and its amendments in a single document, so that, from and after the execution of this Supplementary Agreement, the final and sole version of the Contract between the Parties shall be that contained in this Supplementary Agreement.

 

Wherefore, in light of the foregoing, the Parties have agreed:

 

Clause One: To amend, integrate and consolidate the Contract and its annexes as follows:

 

ARTICLE ONE –

DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

 

Section 1.1. Definitions.

 

Capitalized terms in this Contract shall have the meanings assigned to them in Annex A of this Contract. The definitions in the Carrier Manual shall also be incorporated into the Contract.

 

Section 1.2. Interpretation .

 

For all purposes of this Contract, except as otherwise expressly provided:

 

(a)          Terms defined herein in the singular shall have the same meanings in the plural and vice versa;

 

3
 

 

(b)           Words implying a particular gender shall include all genders;

 

(c)           Any reference to an “Article” or a “Section” shall refer to an Article or Section, as applicable, of this Contract; and

 

(d)           All references to this Contract shall mean this Contract, including all Annexes thereto; and the words “herein,” “hereof,” “hereto,” and “hereunder” and words of similar import shall refer to this Contract in its entirety and not to a particular Article, Annex, Section or other subdivision.

 

Section 1.3 Carrier Manual.

 

The Parties acknowledge and agree that the terms and conditions of the Manual for the Transportation of Oil via the Central Pipeline, as modified from time to time in accordance with applicable law, are an integral part of this Contract. Therefore, matters not addressed herein shall be governed by the rules of the aforementioned Manual (hereinafter the “Carrier Manual”). In the event of a conflict between the Carrier Manual and the Contract, the Contract shall prevail.

 

For modification of the Carrier Manual, the Carrier shall look to the procedures established in applicable regulations. Except in the case of a legal or regulatory requirement, the Carrier shall not make unilaterally any modifications to the Carrier Manual that may have a material effect on the rights or obligations of the Original Shipper under this Contract or of the other Shippers.

 

ARTICLE TWO –

TRANSPORTATION

 

Section 2.1. Purpose of the Contract.

 

The Original Shipper shall nominate the quantities of Oil, shall deliver such nominated quantities, using a daily average on a monthly basis, at the Entry Points and shall withdraw them at the Exit Points, in accordance with the provisions of this Contract and the Carrier Manual. The Carrier shall receive the Oil delivered by the Original Shipper at the Entry Points and shall deliver at the Exit Points a quantity of Oil equivalent to such delivered quantities in accordance with the terms of this Contract and the Carrier Manual. The Original Shipper acknowledges and agrees that, when the Exit Point is TLU-2 at Coveñas Terminal, the nomination that it makes, in respect of the Exit Point, shall be governed, in addition, by the provisions of the Rules of Technical Conditions of Operation of Coveñas Terminal and Annex C of this Contract.

 

4
 

 

ARTICLE THREE –

RIGHTS REGARDING

CAPACITY OF THE CENTRAL PIPELINE

 

Section 3.1. Contracted Capacity.

 

The Original Shipper, for each Segment and for Coveñas Terminal, shall have the right to receive oil transportation services with respect to the Contracted Capacity on the terms established in this Contract and in the Carrier Manual, the Rules of Technical Conditions of Operation of Coveñas Terminal and Annex C of this Contract. The Carrier, for its part, agrees to provide transportation services to the Original Shipper through each Segment and Coveñas Terminal with respect to the Contracted Capacity on the terms established in this Contract and in the Carrier Manual, the Rules of Technical Conditions of Operation of Coveñas Terminal, and Annex C of this Contract.

 

Section 3.2. Other Agreements.

 

The Original Shipper acknowledges that the Carrier (i) has entered into transportation contracts with the other Original Shippers on terms substantially the same as those of this Contract, (ii) has transportation contracts in effect with other Shippers, and (iii) in the future may enter into new transportation contracts with Original Shippers or new Shippers. The new contracts and modifications that may be made to the existing contracts shall not affect the rights or obligations of the Parties under this Contract, except with the express prior authorization of the Original Shipper.

 

Section 3.3 Rights of Affiliates of the Original Shipper with respect to Contracted Capacity.

 

Affiliates of the Original Shipper shall have the right to nominate and to utilize the Contracted Capacity of the Original Shipper, in which case their relationship with the Carrier shall be governed by this Contract. In such event, the nominating Affiliate shall be liable to the Carrier for performance of the obligations arising from the Contract, with the Original Shipper being jointly liable for such performance. In such case, the provisions of Section 6.2 of this Contract shall apply except as provided in paragraph b) thereof.

 

To exercise the right contemplated above, the Original Shipper and its Affiliate shall send to the Carrier a notification signed by its duly authorized legal representatives in which: (i) Affiliate status is certified and (ii) the Affiliate agrees to be bound by the Contract and to comply with it.

 

Section 3.4. Use of Capacity.

 

Without prejudice to the provisions of this Contract, the Carrier shall be free to dispose of the Contracted Capacity not utilized or nominated for a particular Operational Month by the Original Shipper, in accordance with applicable law, without affecting the Contracted Capacity of the Original Shipper.

 

5
 

 

ARTICLE FOUR –

PAYMENT OF TARIFFS AND OTHER CHARGES

 

Section 4.1. Payment of Tariffs.

 

The Original Shipper shall pay the Carrier by Barrel actually received for transport the Tariffs established for each Segment and for Deliveries at Coveñas Terminal in accordance with applicable regulations and this Contract. Payments of Tariffs shall be due and payable in cash. All Tariffs shall be calculated in Dollars and shall be payable in Dollars or, if this is not legally possible, in Colombian pesos liquidated at the market representative rate or its replacement, using the average of the calendar month prior to the payment date, certified by the Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia Superintendency of Finance of Colombia or the entity responsible for the issuance of such certification.

 

Section 4.2. Billing.

 

(a)           On or before the twentieth (20 th ) day of the Operational Month, the Carrier shall send to the Original Shipper an invoice stating the sum payable by the Original Shipper after applying the Tariff on Programmed Capacity by Segment and for the Coveñas Terminal by Exit Point for the respective Operational Month.

 

(b)           The Original Shipper shall pay the invoiced amount to the Carrier no later than the tenth (10 th ) Business Day of the month immediately following the month in which the invoice is submitted, or, in the event submission of the invoice is delayed, within twenty (20) calendar days following its submission. Upon expiration of the period provided herein, it shall be understood for all purposes that the Original Shipper is in default without any need for judicial or extrajudicial claim or counterclaim whatsoever.

 

(c)            In the invoice for the second month following the submission of the initial invoice, the Carrier shall make adjustments due to greater or lesser volumes actually received for transport and adjustments to Volumetric Compensation for Quality as applicable.

 

(d)           If the Original Shipper is not in agreement with any invoice submitted by the Carrier, it shall notify the Carrier in writing, without prejudice to the requirement to make the applicable payment within the designated time period. The Parties shall take prompt action jointly to determine the reason for the discrepancy within thirty (30) calendar days following notice by the Original Shipper. If the Parties determine that the Original Shipper overpaid, the Carrier shall return, within ten (10) days following acknowledgment by the Carrier of the overpayment, the corresponding amount together with remunerative interest, applying the current bank interest rate, certified by the Superintendencia Financiera if payment is made in Colombian pesos, or at the annual rate of Libor+2 if payment is made in dollars, but in no event in excess of the usury rate established under Colombian law or less than the Consumer Price Index for the immediately preceding calendar year.

 

Section 4.3. Remedies of the Carrier.

 

(a)            If the Original Shipper has not paid the Tariff or any sum of money owed to the Carrier under this Contract within the time established in Article 4, it shall pay the Carrier default interest on the amount outstanding for the number of days of default at the maximum rate permitted by law if payment is to be made in Colombian pesos and at an annual rate of Libor+4 if payment is to be made in dollars, but in no event in excess of the usury rate established under Colombian law or less than the Consumer Price Index for the immediately preceding calendar year.

 

6
 

 

(b)           If there are sums of money owed to the Carrier by the Original Shipper under this Contract that are sixty (60) or more days past due, the Carrier may commercialize the Oil of the Original Shipper at market rates, with the obligation to deliver to the Original Shipper, within fifteen (15) Business Days following the date on which it receives the proceeds of the sale of the Oil, the difference between the sales price and the amount of the past due obligation plus interest and Charges. If the Carrier was unable to sell the Oil of the Original Shipper at market rates that permit it to recover all of the amounts owed within the following thirty (30) calendar days following the aforementioned sixty (60) days, the Carrier may then suspend receipt of Oil of the Original Shipper until:

 

(i)          all amounts owed to which this Contract refers have been fully paid to the Carrier; and

 

(ii)         the Original Shipper delivers to the Carrier a letter of credit or similar guarantee of credit issued by a financial institution reasonably acceptable to the Carrier, in favor of the Carrier, with a term of six (6) months, irrevocable and payable on demand, guaranteeing payment of all Tariffs, Charges and other sums of money that may become due under this Contract. Such guarantee shall be in an amount equal to the product of the Tariff then in effect for all the Segments and Coveñas Terminal multiplied by the Contracted Capacity of such Original Shipper for one month. The suspension shall not release the Original Shipper from any obligation to pay past due amounts arising under this Contract.

 

When the Carrier has suspended receipt of Oil from the Original Shipper under this Contract, the Contracted Capacity of the Original Shipper shall be Available Capacity of which the Carrier may dispose for the duration of the suspension.

 

The Carrier may suspend Receipt of Oil from the Original Shipper after ninety (90) days of default in payment of any invoice.

 

(c)            In addition to the remedies set forth in this clause, the Carrier may exercise any and all of its rights under Colombian law.

 

Section 4.4. Right of Set-off

 

The Parties acknowledge that the right of set-off shall apply with respect to liquid sums of money that they owe to each other arising from the rights and obligations under this Contract. The party applying the set-off shall so communicate in writing to the other Party.

 

7
 

 

ARTICLE FIVE –

TERM

 

Section 5.1. Term

 

This Contract entered into force on March 31, 1995 and shall remain in full force and effect up to December 31, 2093.

 

Section 5.2 Early Termination

 

(a)           Without detriment to the provisions of Section 5.2 (b), the Original Shipper may terminate this Contract by written notice to the Carrier provided that, as of the termination date, the monetary obligations assumed by the Carrier under the internal loan agreement signed on March 19, 2010 with Bancolombia, S.A., Banco de Bogotá, S.A., Banco de Occidente, Banco Popular, S.A., Banco Comercial AV Villas S.A., Banco Davivienda S.A., Banco Bilboa Vizcaya Argentaria Colombia S.A., Banco Agrario de Colombia S.A., Banco Santander Colombia, S.A., and Helm Bank S.A. have been paid in their entirety. For termination of this Contract to take effect, the Original Shipper shall send a communication to the other Party no less than six (6) calendar months in advance of the date on which the Contract ends, stating its decision to terminate the Contract. Early termination of the Contract in the terms of this provision shall not result in compensation of any kind for the Carrier.

 

(b)      The Carrier may terminate this Contract in advance in the event that the Original Shipper seriously breaches the obligations arising herefrom. For early termination due to serious breach to be in order, the Carrier shall give notice of the breach to the Original Shipper by written communication sent to its domicile in which it will inform the Original Shipper of the event that generated the breach. For the purposes of this clause, the following shall be deemed serious breach:

 

(i)          Delivering less than eighty-five percent (85%) of the Crude Oil nominated by the Original shipper and accepted by the Carrier in a Nomination Month four (4) times during the same calendar year, provided such situation has affected the Scheduled Capacity and the fulfillment of the Carrier’s obligations to other Original Shippers, Shippers, and/or Third Parties. Each event of breach in the terms established herein shall be notified to the Original Shipper in writing as soon as possible, but no later than thirty (30) days following the Operating Month in which the breach occurred.

 

When the information learned by the Carrier over the course of its normal operations shows that the Original Shipper is delivering smaller volumes in the Operating Month than those Scheduled for that Operating Month, it shall so inform the Original Shipper. The absence of said notice shall not remedy the breach or limit the Carrier’s right to terminate the Contract.

 

8
 

 

(ii)    Being more than sixty (60) days delinquent in the payment of the invoices issued by the Carrier over the course of this Contract more than four (4) times during the same calendar year.

 

(iii)   Failing to pay the invoices for more than one hundred eighty (180) days or when the suspension of receipt of Crude Oil to which section 4.3 (b) refers lasts for more than ninety (90) days.

 

(iv)  When, in definitive assignments, the assignee of the Contract, or in the cases of indirect assignments, the new beneficiary thereof, does not maintain the financial qualification or guarantee conditions that led to the acceptance of the assignment by the Carrier, or does not proceed to certify the fulfillment thereof within the term established in this Contract, save if such event is remedied within sixty (60) days following that on which the grounds for termination is notified, furnishing proof to the Carrier that it complies with one of the conditions described in Section 6.1 (a) of the Contract. Without prejudice to the above, as of the notification of breach, the Carrier shall have the right to suspend the Original Shipper’s Receipt of Crude Oil, in which case as long as the suspension is maintained, the Contracted Capacity shall be the Available Capacity.

 

(v)   When there is an indirect assignment due to a change in control of the Original Shipper and the Original Shipper has not furnished proof of meeting the conditions described in Section 6.1 (a) of this Contract with in sixty (60) days following the indirect assignment, save if such event is remedied within the sixty (60) days following that on which the grounds for termination was notified, furnishing proof to the Carrier that it complies with one of the conditions described in Section 6.1 (a) of the contract. Without prejudice to the above, as of the notification of breach, the Carrier shall have the right to suspend the Original Shipper’s Receipt of Crude Oil, in which case as long as the suspension is maintained, the Contracted Capacity shall be the Available Capacity.

 

In all other cases, termination of the contract shall require resorting to the dispute resolution mechanism to which Article 10, Section 10.1 refers in order for termination to be decreed.

 

The Original Shipper recognizes that, without prejudice to the provisions of this article, any breach of the Contract shall entitle the Carrier to impose the sums of money and fines established in the Carrier’s Manual, as well as to request compensation for any damages that may have been caused to it with the respective breach.

 

(c)          Any communication that the Carrier must send to the Original Shipper in execution of the right established in (b) above shall be copied to its assignee in the event of temporary assignments. In addition to the above, the Carrier shall inform the assignee of an Original Shipper under a temporary assignment in case of delinquency in the payment of any sum of money for more than twenty (20) days, without the fact of not reporting the breach implying a modification to the term for the payment established in Article 4 and or (b) (ii) above.

 

9
 

 

ARTICLE SIX –

ASSIGNMENT

 

Section 6.1 Types of Contract Assignment

 

(a)           Definitive Assignment . The Original Shipper may at any time definitively assign all or part of the Contract with prior written authorization from the Carrier.

 

The assignment shall be authorized within fifteen (15) Business Days following the date on which the assignee furnishes proof that it complies with one of the following requirements:

 

1.      Credit Rating

 

The assignee has a credit rating of at least BB- issued by Standard & Poor’s (S&P) or its equivalent issued by Moody’s or Fitch Ratings, or any of their affiliates or subsidiaries; or

 

2.      Financial Indicators

 

As of the date of the financial statements referenced below, the assignee proves that:

 

(i)       It has working capital (current assets less current liabilities) equal to or greater than 1.2 times the value of the annual payment which the assignee must make to the Carrier for the transportation service Tariff, calculated by multiplying the assigned Contracted Capacity by the current Tariff per Barrel, by 365 days; and

 

(ii)      It has liquid net assets 1.5 times greater than the annual transportation commitment assumed by the assignee, calculated by multiplying the assigned Contracted Capacity by the current Tariff per Barrel, by 365 days.

 

The indicators to which (i) and (ii) above refer shall be supported and demonstrated with (a) certified financial statements, or (b) certified and audited financial statements, in both cases with a cutoff date no earlier than three months prior to the date of the request for approval of the assignment.

 

If only the financial statements to which (a) above refers are submitted, the assignee’s latest available certified and audited financial statements shall also be submitted along with them. When any of these statements show that the assignee does not comply with the indicators to which (i) and (ii) above refer, the Carrier may request reasonable explanations on changes that took place between the latest audited financial statements and the certified financial statements that might have had an impact on the working capital or the liquid net assets. If the explanations are not reasonably satisfactory for the Carrier, it shall have the right to deny the assignment request; or

 

10
 

 

3.      Guarantees

 

Deliver an irrevocable stand-by letter of credit in favor of the Carrier issued by a duly organized banking establishment authorized to operate in accordance with Colombian law, with an AAA credit rating for its long-term debt in pesos, provided the currency exchange regulations so permit, or by a foreign financial entity with a risk rating no lower than AAA issued by Standard & Poor’s (S&P) or its equivalent issued by Moody’s or Fitch Ratings, or any of their affiliates or subsidiaries.

 

The stand-by letter of credit shall secure the payment of a value equal to six (6) months of transportation service, calculated at the current Tariff per Barrel at the time that it is issued, multiplied by the assignee’s Contracted Capacity, by 180, and shall have an initial term of twelve (12) months. The assignee undertakes to keep this guarantee in effect up to the termination date of this Contract; or

 

4.      Guarantee from the Parent Company

 

That the Parent Company complies with the financial qualification or guarantee conditions established herein; and jointly and severally undertakes the obligations to be assumed by the assignee.

 

Paragraph: If the assignee does not comply with one of the aforementioned conditions, the Carrier shall have the right to deny the assignment whose authorization is being requested. Without prejudice to the above, before the assignment is rejected, the Carrier, the Original Shipper and the assignee may reach agreements that make it possible to accept the assignment without meeting the requirements to which this subparagraph (a) refers, provided that, in the Carrier’s judgment, said agreements provide sufficient guarantee of fulfillment of the Contract.

 

In any of the cases indicated in this subparagraph (a), the assignee shall, for the duration of the Contract, maintain the conditions that led to the acceptance of the Assignment or furnish proof to the Carrier that it meets one of the conditions described in Section 6.1 (a) of the Contract. For such purposes, the assignee shall prove to the Carrier, no later than March thirty first (31) and September thirtieth (30) of each year, that it complies with the conditions established herein. Without prejudice to the above, the Carrier may at any time request proof of the fulfillment of any of the requirements indicated above, and the assignee must deliver the respective information within fifteen (15) Business days following the Carrier’s request.

 

For authorization of the assignment by the Carrier, the assignee shall expressly assume all the obligations arising from the Contract, regardless of whether they originated prior to the assignment. Once the assignment is authorized, the Original Shipper/assignor shall be released from any liability arising from the Contract for all purposes of Article 893 of the Commercial Code.

 

11
 

 

In the event of indirect assignments of this Contract resulting from a merger, spin-off or reorganization process, among others, which involve a change in the Control of the Original Shipper, the new beneficiary of this Contract shall comply with the requirements established herein, a situation that must be proven to the Carrier within sixty (60) days following the indirect assignment. The provisions established herein, as well as in (a) above, shall not apply in the cases in which the change in Control of the Original Shipper results from a change in the Control of the Parent Company that is listed on a public stock exchange.

 

The conditions established in (a) above for the definitive assignment shall not apply to assignments made to an Affiliate (present or future) of the party that was the Original Shipper on January 17, 2013 or to another Original Shipper who held that status on January 17, 2013 and authorization from the Carrier shall therefore not be required.

 

For the case of guarantees furnished by non-residents in Columbia, they shall be registered with the Banco de la República at the time when the authorization of the assignment is requested.

 

(b)           Temporary assignment . The Original Shipper may temporarily assign all or part of the Contract, for which purpose it shall notify the Carrier prior to the first nomination made by the assignee. The notification of the assignment shall include its effective date and its termination date.

 

The Original Shipper shall be deemed jointly and severally liable for all the obligations assumed by the assignee by virtue of the Temporary Assignment.

 

Section 6.2 Requirements applicable to the different types of assignment .

 

(a)          The Carrier may deny any assignment made by the Original Shipper when the assignee is a person with whom entering into transactions or business dealings is prohibited for Persons from the United States of America under any of the sanctions programs of the United States of America administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) of the U.S. Treasury Department; or that has been included or comes to he included in the sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security Council, the European Union or Switzerland.

 

(b)          The Original Shipper shall not assign the Contract unless it is in good standing with respect to payment of the Tariff and imposed fines arising from this Contract at the time that the assignment is made.

 

(c)          Any assignment that is made, whether temporary or definitive, shall be effective vis-à-vis the Carrier as of the Nomination Month in which the assignee is in term for nominating, after fulfilling the requirements established in the Carrier’s Manual for nominating. When a temporary assignment is involved, the Original Shipper shall indicate the term thereof to the Carrier.

 

12
 

 

(d)          When this section speaks of the power to assign all or part of the Contract, it refers to the assignment of a percentage of the entire contractual position, and not the individual assignment of some of the rights or obligations arising from the Contract. When a partial assignment is involved, it must specify the number of Barrels of the Contracted Capacity that are being assigned and in which of the Segments.

 

(e)          The document in which the assignment is recorded shall establish whether the assignment includes the Original Shipper’s Crude Oil inventories found in the Oil Pipeline in the month preceding the Operating Month in which the assignee delivers Crude Oil for transportation, as well as the handling of the inventories that are found in the Oil Pipeline when the term of the assignment ends.

 

In the event that the assignment does not include the Original Shipper’s inventories and the Original Shipper ceases to have Contracted Capacity, or that at the end of the assignment, the assignee has inventories in the Oil Pipeline, the assignor and the Carrier or the assignee and the Carrier, as applicable, shall agree in good faith on the mechanism for evacuating said inventory.

 

Section 6.3            Assignment by the Carrier

 

(a)          This Contract cannot be assigned by the Carrier without prior written authorization from the Original Shipper.

 

(b)          Without prejudice to the above and the provisions of Section 6.3 (c) of this Contract, the Carrier may assign its financial rights arising from this Contract without requiring authorization from the Original Shipper. In any event, the Carrier shall notify the Original Shipper of such assignment and it shall have full legal effects as of the eleventh Business Day following the date on which the Original Shipper received said notification.

 

(c)          The Parties agree that the Carrier shall not totally or partially assign this Contract when the assignee is a person with whom entering into transactions or business dealings is prohibited for Persons from the United States of America under any of the sanctions programs of the United States of America administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) of the U.S. Treasury Department; or that has been included or comes to he included in the sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security Council, the European Union or Switzerland.

 

ARTICLE SEVEN –

JUSTIFIED EVENT

 

Section 7.1 Justified Event

 

For the purposes of this Contract, “Justified Event” means an event or circumstance that (i) could not have been reasonably foreseen by the affected party (“Affected Party”) prior it its occurrence; (ii) could in no case be attributed to the fault of the Affected Party, (iii) the Affected Party could not overcome by making reasonable efforts applicable to the exercise of the activity, and (iv) prevent the Affected Party from fulfilling its obligations arising herefrom.

 

13
 

 

Events of terrorism, strike (whether legal or illegal), work stoppage or labor disputes, civil unrest or rainfall conditions, acts of public enemies, war (declared or not), civil war, sabotage, blockades, revolution, coups d’état, insurrection, riots, epidemics, cyclones, tsunamis, landslides, lightning, earthquakes, floods, storms, fire, adverse weather conditions, and explosions shall constitute Justified Events without meeting the condition established in (i) of the preceding paragraph, provided the requirements mentioned in (ii) to (iv) thereof are met.

 

Additionally, the Carrier shall be released from the fulfillment of its obligations when the Justified Event is due to an inherent defect of the transported Crude Oil, provided it has exercised the controls inherent to its activity at the time of receipt thereof, or to the exclusive act of a third party.

 

In the case of situations that affect the Original Shipper and have been caused by other Shippers, such situation shall be resolved as established in section 10.1 hereof; therefore, the Original Shipper accepts and agrees to abide by the arbitration clause contained in the transportation contracts entered into by the Carrier with the other Shippers in terms substantially equal to those of this Contract.

 

Section 7.2 Notification

 

Subject to Section 7.3, the obligations of an Affected Party under this Contract shall be suspended insofar and only insofar as said obligations are affected by a Justified Event. In such event, the Affected Party shall present written notification to the other Party with all the details of the Justified Event, including the day and, if possible, the time when it began, along with a description of the obligations affected by it, immediately and no later than within three (3) days following that on which the Justified Event occurs.

 

Section 7.3 Suspension of Obligations

 

Any delay or failure by the Affected Party in the execution of any of its obligations under this Contract shall not constitute a breach hereunder or give rise to any claim for damages against the Affected Party insofar as (i) said delay or failure is caused by the Justified Event and (ii) the Affected Party:

 

(a)    Makes all reasonable efforts to mitigate the effect of said delay or failure;

 

(b)    Resumes execution of its obligations as soon as reasonably possible once the Justified Event concludes.

 

(c)    Presents timely written notification to the other Party concerning all the significant facts and events with respect to the Affected Party’s efforts to comply as specified in (a) and (b) above, and regarding the termination of the Justified Event, including the day and, if appropriate, the time of the termination; and

 

14
 

 

(d)          Makes all reasonable efforts and proceeds with reasonable diligence to remedy the Justified Event.

 

ARTICLE EIGHT –

LIABILITY AND COMPENSATION

 

Section 8.1        In relation to the obligations arising from the Contract, the Carrier:

 

(a)           Shall exercise custody over the Original Shipper’s Crude Oil from the time that the Carrier effectively receives the Crude Oil at the Entry Point up to the time that the Carrier makes the Crude Oil available to the Original Shipper (or whomsoever it designates as consignee of the Crude Oil shipment) at the Exit Point.

 

(b)           It shall not be liable for the Non-Identifiable Losses of the Original Shipper’s Crude Oil that occur in the Oil Pipeline, with respect to which the limits established in the Resolution, the Carrier’s Manual or any provision that modifies them shall apply.

 

(c)           It shall be liable for the Identifiable Losses and breaches of contract, save when it has demonstrated that such losses and breaches were caused by a Justified Event.

 

(d)           Taking into account that, as the Original Shipper is aware, the Carrier transports Crude Oil of different qualities and characteristics, the Carrier is not obligated to deliver Crude Oil with a quality identical to that received to the Original Shipper (or whomsoever it designates as consignee of the Crude Oil shipment). The Carrier’s responsibility shall be limited to making the Volumetric Compensation Adjustments for Quality, provided such adjustments are in order in the terms of the Contract and the Carrier’s Manual.

 

(e)           None of the Parties shall be liable to the other in any case and under any circumstances for indirect, special or consequential damages.

 

(f)           In the event of total or partial Identifiable Losses or Non-Identifiable Losses greater than those established in the Resolution, the Carrier’s Manual, or any provision that modifies them attributable to the Carrier, the Carrier shall repair the damage suffered by the Original Shipper. For such purposes, the Parties state, accept and understand that, save if the damage or Identifiable Loss is caused by intentional misconduct or gross negligence on the part of the Carrier, the Carrier shall only respond (i) for actual monetary loss, up to 75% of the Declared Value of the Barrels of Crude Oil lost and (ii) for lost profits, up to 25% of the amount that must be paid by the Carrier as compensation in accordance with (iii) above; all provided that the damage is duly corroborated.

 

(g)           In case of damages or losses resulting from the fact that the Carrier does not make the Contracted Capacity available to the Original Shipper or does not transport the Scheduled Capacity, it shall pay by way of compensation for actual monetary losses and lost profits, duly corroborated, up to a maximum sum of money equal to 100% of the Tariff multiplied by the number of Barrels not transported. The above limitation shall not apply in the cases involving willful misconduct or gross negligence on the part of the Carrier.

 

15
 

 

(h)          In the cases of damages or losses arising from causes other than those established in (f) and (g) for reasons attributable to the Carrier, the latter shall only respond for actual monetary losses and lost profits for up to a maximum sum of money equal to 100% of the Tariff multiplied by the Original Shipper’s Scheduled Capacity for the Operating Month in which the damage occurred. The above limitation shall not apply in the cases involving willful misconduct or gross negligence on the part of the Carrier.

 

ARTICLE NINE –

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

 

Section 9.1 Scope

 

Each Party shall ensure that all information exchanged over the course of this Contract or that it otherwise comes to learn in connection herewith (collectively, “Confidential Information”) shall be kept confidential

 

Unless (a) required by a competent authority or (b) reasonably required in good faith by the Party that discloses it in response to an environmental emergency or other emergency that might have a considerable adverse effect for the parties, the Confidential Information shall not be disclosed without the consent of the other Party, except to:

 

(i)      The directors, executives and employees of the Parties and their Affiliates;

 

(ii)    A financial advisor, a legal advisor, consultant, contractor or subcontractor who has the commercial need to be informed and has signed an agreement to protect the Confidential Information in terms similar to those by which the Parties are bound under this section;

 

(iii)     Any third party to whom the disclosing Party plans to assign this Contract in the terms hereof and has signed a confidentiality agreement that is satisfactory for the disclosing Party.

 

ARTICLE TEN –

DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 

Section 10.1. Arbitration Clause

 

Any dispute or disagreement relative to or in connection with this Contract shall be resolved by institutional arbitration administered by the Arbitration and Conciliation Center of the Bogota Chamber of Commerce in accordance with the following rules:

 

16
 

 

(a)          The tribunal shall consist of three (3) arbiters designated by the Parties by mutual agreement. If said agreement cannot be reached, the arbiters shall be designated by the Arbitration and Conciliation Center of the Bogota Chamber of Commerce from said Center’s “A” list of arbiters, at the request of any of the parties.

 

(b)          The arbitration shall be governed by the rules of procedure established in Colombian law for institutional domestic arbitration, particularly by Law 1563 of 2012 and any provisions that replace, modify or supplement it.

 

(c)          The award shall be issued based on the law.

 

(d)          The arbitral tribunal shall be headquartered in Bogotá, Colombia at the facilities of the Bogota Chamber of Commerce Arbitration Center.

 

(e)          The fees shall be those established by the Bogotá Chamber of Commerce.

 

(f)          Two or more Original Shippers may join their claims under the same request and petition for arbitration provided all the contracts to which they refer have an arbitration clause substantially equal to the present clause. The arbitral tribunal established as agreed in this clause shall be authorized and competent to hear all of them. Similarly, the Carrier shall have the right to join its claims against two or more Original Shippers that have an arbitration clause substantially equal to the present clause.

 

Without prejudice to the duty to inform or disclose contained in the applicable legal provisions, when accepting their designations, the arbiters shall state to the Parties in writing that they are independent and impartial for purposes of acting as arbiters in the disagreement or dispute.

 

ARTICLE ELEVEN –

OPERATIONS

 

Section 11.1 Use of the Crude Oil

 

The Carrier may reach Crude Oil purchasing or supply agreements with the Original Shipper to use it as fuel or lubricant for equipment or other similar purposes for its Operations.

 

Section 11.2 Volumetric Compensation for Quality

 

The Carrier shall make volumetric adjustments for quality as established in the Carrier’s Manual.

 

17
 

 

ARTICLE TWELVE –

GENERAL ASPECTS

 

Section 12.1 Notifications

 

All notifications, requests, complaints, instructions and other communications under this Contract shall be made in writing and delivered personally or by certified or registered mail, or by e-mail with record of receipt, addressed to the recipient as follows:

 

Original Shipper Carrier
ECOPETROL S.A. OLEODUCTO CENTRAL S.A.
Phone:  2344000 Phone:  3250200
E-mail: E-mail
presidencia@ecopetrol.com.co oscar.trujillo@ocensa.com.co
javier.gutierrez@ecopetrol.com.co hernan.bedoya@ocesa.com.co
  maria.camacho@ocensa.com.co
Attn:  Javier Genaro Gutiérrez P. Attention:  Oscar Trujillo

 

or any other electronic means with respect to which the parties have agreed on confirmation systems as set forth in Law 527 of 1999 and its subsequent modifications. Any notification, demand, request, instruction or other communication that is delivered personally shall be deemed definitively delivered on the actual delivery date thereof, and if delivered by certified or registered mail, on the fifth Business Day following its delivery to the post office, and if made by e-mail, on the transmission date thereof, provided it is sent during the recipient’s work hours and Business Days; otherwise, it shall be deemed received on the Business Day after the electronic communication was sent.

 

All notifications related to breaches of the Original Shipper or termination of this Contract shall be made in writing and sent by certified mail.

 

Section 12.2 Entire Contract

 

This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to Crude Oil transportation through the Oil Pipeline and contains all previous agreements, understandings, negotiations or discussions of the Parties, whether oral or written. The non-exercise of any of the rights contained in this Contract shall not be deemed a waiver of the respective right or a similar right, save if expressly established otherwise.

 

Section 12.3 Legal System

 

This Contract shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the Republic of Colombia with the exception of the rules on conflict of laws.

 

Section 12.4 Nature of the Obligations

 

Nothing contained herein shall be deemed or construed as making the Original Shipper the surety or guarantor of the Carrier or liable for complying with its obligations.

 

18
 

 

Section 12.5 Modifications

 

Any modification of this Contract shall be put on record in writing and signed by the Parties.

 

Section 12.6 Severability

 

If any provision of this Contract is not valid for any reason, the remaining provisions hereof shall remain in force and effect. Any provision of this Contract that cannot be enforced in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate or make complying with such provision impossible in any other jurisdiction.

 

Section 12.7 Headings.

 

The headings contained herein are for ease of reference only and do not constitute part of this Contract.

 

Section 12.8 Approvals

 

Each of the Parties states that it has all the approvals needed to give full force and effect to this Contract and the transactions provided for herein and in the Annexes hereto.

 

Section 12.9 Acknowledgment

 

Nothing in this Contract is intended to create nor shall be construed as creating a partnership, collaboration agreement, unincorporated association, or similar between the Parties.

 

Section 12.10 Copies

 

This Contract may be signed in two or more copies, each deemed an original, but all constituting the same and sole document.

 

Section 12.11 Language of the Contract

 

This Contract is signed in Spanish.

 

End of Text”

 

Clause Two: Annex A to the Contract shall read as follows:

 

“ANNEX A – DEFINITIONS:

 

In this Contract and all other Annexes and in any other document making reference to this Annex, the following terms shall have the meaning assigned to them below (the singular includes the plural and vice versa). Unless otherwise specified, references in this Annex to a Section are to the Sections of the Contract.

 

19
 

 

Affiliate ” is, with respect to a Party: (i) the person(s) or entity(ies) that Control said Party, whether they exercise said Control individually or together with other persons or entities which, in turn, shall be considered Affiliates of the Controlled Party; (ii) any person or entity Controlled by said Party; and (iii) any person under the common control of any other person or entity with said Party, whether said person or entity exercises the Control individually or together with other persons or entities.

 

Cuisana Area ” means the Cusiana and Cupiagua oilfields located within the jurisdiction of the Casanare Department, Colombia.

 

Contracted Capacity ” means, for the Original Shipper, 138,794 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis for Segment 0; 403,064 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis for Segment 1; 403,064 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis for Segment 2 ; and 262,868 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis for Segment 3; and for the Coveñas Terminal, it shall be entitled to the withdrawals scheduled by the Carrier in accordance with the Coveñas Terminal Regulations for Technical Operating Conditions and Annex C of this Contract, save insofar as the Contracted Capacity changes due to any succession or assignment permitted by the Contract. When Completion of the Delta 35 Project takes place, the Contracted Capacity shall be: 138,794 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis for Segment 0; 422,691 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis for Segment 1; 422,691 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis for Segment 2; and 285,299 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis for Segment 3; and for the Coveñas Terminal, it shall be entitled to the withdrawals scheduled by the Carrier in accordance with the Coveñas Terminal Regulations for Technical Operating Conditions and Annex C of this Contract

 

Effective Capacity ” shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Carrier’s Manual. For purposes of calculating the Contracted Capacity, the Effective Capacity shall be that determined in Annex B.

 

Charges ” All reasonable costs and expenses incurred (including, but not limited to, marketing expenses and insurance) and any tax on the Carrier for the storage, withdrawal and sale of Crude Oil incurred by the Carrier in furtherance of the payment in kind.

 

Completion of the Delta 35 Project ” shall be the day on which all of the following events occur: (i) the mechanical completion and commissioning of the activities required under the Delta 35 Project and (ii) the operating and performance tests that the Carrier may deem necessary in accordance with the industry standards.

 

Control ” and the related terms such as “ to Control ,” Controls ,” “ Controlled ,” or “ Controlling ” have the meaning established in Articles 260 and 261 of the Commercial Code and any provisions that modify and supplement them from time to time.

 

Cusiana Crude means the Crude produced in the sectors called Santiago de las Atalayas, Tauramena and Río Chitamena in the Cusiana Area.

 

20
 

 

Business Day ” means the day on which commercial banks in Bogota and New York City are authorized to be open for national and international business dealings.

 

Dollars” means U.S. dollars.

 

DRA or “Drag Reduction Agent ” is a chemical product that reduces the friction between the Crude Oil and the Oil Pipeline.

 

Justified Event ” has the meaning assigned to it in Section 7.1 of the Contract.

 

Consumer Price Index ” is the calculation performed by the National Administrative Department of Statistics ( Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadisticas - DANE) that measures the average percent variation in the prices of a group of goods and end services demanded by Colombian consumers in a given period of time.

 

“Libor” is the London Interbank Offered Rate for U.S. dollars based on an interest period of one (1) month, published on the website of the British Bankers Association on the due date of a payment. If such publication is not available on the due date of a payment, the publication of the first day before said due date shall be used.

 

“Parties ” means the Original Shipper and the Carrier

 

Affected Party ” has the meaning assigned to it in Section 7.1 of the Contract.

 

Peso” means the legal currency of Colombia.

 

Delta 35 Project ” means the project for improving system reliability and making it viable to transport an additional 35,000 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis for Segments 1 and 2 and 40,000 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis for Segment 3 after the revamp of the existing stations and the injection of DRA to achieve a target Effective Capacity of 610,000 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis in Segments 1 and 2 and 415,000 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis in Segment 3 under the following main suppositions: (i) that the Crude Oil to be transported has a maximum viscosity of 300 centistokes and a minimum API of 18°; and (ii) that the Crude Oil transported by the Oil Pipeline has a maximum composition of 80% heavy Crude Oil, the above as provided in Annex B of the Contract. It is understood that the Delta 35 Project will include the Crude Oil receipt and withdrawal facilities at the Coveñas Terminal with respect to the capacity involved in the expansion.

 

Coveñas Terminal Regulations for Technical Operating Conditions ” are the technical regulations for operations of the Coveñas Terminal issued in accordance with Resolution No. 071 of 1997 from the Superintendence of Ports and Transportations, with its modifications and additions.

 

21
 

 

Original Shipper ” has the meaning assigned to it in the preamble to the Contract, and its authorized heirs and assignees as set forth in Section 6.1

 

Original Shippers ” means Ecopetrol S.A., Equion Energìa Limited, Total E&P Colombia, Santiago Oil Company, Transporte & Marketing S.A.S., CEPSA Colombia S.A., Talisman (Colombia) Oil & Gas Ltd., Talisman Santiago (Cayman) Inc., Talisman SO (Cayman) Inc. and each of their respective permitted heirs and assigns.

 

Tariff” means the tariff as established in the current regulations, along with its modifications, amendments or additions, that the Carrier will charge the Original Shipper. For the first tariff period ending on June 30, 2015, the Tariff shall be that set by the Ministry of Mines and Energy by means of: Resolution 00124689 dated November 30, 2011 for Segment 0, Resolution 00124688 dated November 30, 2011 for Segment 1, Resolution 00124687 dated November 30, 2011 for Segment 2, and Resolution 00124686 dated November 30, 2011 for Segment 3. For the Coveñas Terminal, the applicable Tariff shall be: (i) For Exit Point TLU-02, the appropriate tariff in accordance with Law 1 of 1990 and Resolution 723 of 1993, as modified from time to time and (ii) for the onshore Exit Point, 0.40 Dollars per Barrel, which shall be adjusted based on the definition and adjustment criteria for the established Tariff for the Withdrawals made at Exit Point TLU-2 at the Coveñas Terminal.

 

“Declared Value” (a) for the Vasconia blend-type Crude Oil, it shall be the average of the daily closing quotes for Vasconia crude, according to the Argus publication during the Operating Month; (b) for the Castilla blend-type Crude Oil, it shall be the average of the daily closing quotes for Castilla crude, according to the Argus publication during the Operating Month. In all cases, the mathematical average will be used, rounded to four decimal points and (c) for Crude Oil other than that indicated in (a) and (b) above which has no quote in Argus or another similar publication, it will be determined using the average Specific Gravity (SG) determined based on the API Gravity and the Sulfur content (% S) according to the Operating Month’s quality and quantity report for the Crude Oil whose price is to be determined, according to the following formula:

 

Price per Barrel in Dollars = b0 + (bl*SG) + (b2*%S)

 

Where

 

b0 = base price of the Crude Oil
b1 = price adjustment factor for SG
b2 = price adjustment factor for sulfur content (%S)

 

The values for b0, b1 and b2 used in this formula shall be those obtained in the crude oil appraisal process in the Volumetric Compensation for Quality in the Operating Month in question, following the routine procedures established by the Carrier.

 

Clause Three: Annex B shall read as follows:

 

22
 

 

“ANNEX B – CONTRACTED CAPACITY”

 

ANNEX B

 

DETERMINATION AND ALLOCATION OF CONTRACTED CAPACITY

 

1.       Calculation of Contracted Capacity

 

(i)     Before the Completion of the Delta 35 Project, for purposes of determining the number of barrels forming part of the Original Shipper’s Contracted Capacity, the following Effective Capacity per segment was used as a basis: Segment 0 – 198,000 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis; Segment 1: 575,000 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis; Segment 2: 575,000 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis; Segment 3: 375,000 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis; and for the Coveñas Terminal, the receipt of 375,000 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis coming from Segment 3, provided the Withdrawal Conditions to which the Coveñas Terminal Regulations for Technical Operating Conditions and Annex C refer are met.

 

(ii)    If the Delta 35 Project is executed, once Completion of the Delta 35 Project occurs, the Carrier shall notify the Original Shipper in writing of: (a) its New Contracted Capacity expressed in thousands of Barrels average per day on a monthly basis in the next Effective Capacity per Segment average per day on a monthly basis, from which the 20% for the Preferential Right in favor of National Oil has already been deducted: Segment 0, 198,000 Barrels per day; Segment 1: 603,000 Barrels per day; Segment 2: 603,000 Barrels per day; Segment 3: 407,000 Barrels per day; and for the Coveñas Terminal, the receipt of 407,000 Barrels average per day on a monthly basis coming from Segment 3, provided the Withdrawal Conditions to which the Coveñas Terminal Regulations for Technical Operating Conditions \and Annex C refer are met; (b) the date as of which the additional capacity provided by the Delta 35 project will be available. If the Crude Oil nominations in exercise of the Preferential Right in favor of National Oil are less than 20% of the Delta 35 Project’s Effective Capacity, such capacity shall be part of the Available Capacity.

 

(iii)   The Parties understand that if, either temporarily or permanently, the Effective Capacity before or after the Completion of the Delta 35 Project is greater than the capacity per Segment established in this annex for any reason, this situation shall not increase or reduce the Original Shipper’s Contracted Capacity. The difference between the Effective Capacity and the sum of the Original Shippers’ Contracted Capacities per Segment shall be part of the Available Capacity.

 

(iv)   The Effective Capacity per Segment and therefore the Contracted Capacity of each Original Shipper was chiefly determined assuming: (i) the Design Capacity (ii) the use of Drag Reduction Agents (DRA), and (iii) that the Crude Oil transported by the Oil Pipeline is no more than 80% heavy Crude Oil, according to the specifications established in Table No.1 of this Annex and no less than 20% light or intermediate Crude Oils according to the Specifications established in Table No. 2 of this Annex.

 

23
 

 

(v)  If the volume of heavy Crude Oil delivered or to be delivered exceeds the percentage limits determined above, the Effective Capacity of the Oil Pipeline may decrease, proportionally reducing the Original Shipper’s Contracted Capacity. In the event that an increase in the quantity of heavy Crude Oil delivered or to be delivered reduces the Oil Pipeline’s Effective Capacity in a given Operating Month, affecting the Contracted Capacity of the Original Shippers, the Carrier shall have the right, as long as the reduction in Effective Capacity for this reason lasts, to reduce the Contracted Capacity of the Original Shipper that delivers or plans to deliver more than 80% heavy Crude Oil, or if there are two or more Original Shippers who deliver or plan to deliver heavy Crude Oil, prorated among them, in a proportion equal to that needed to ensure that the Contracted Capacity of all other Original Shippers is not affected.

 

(vi)   Save agreement between the Parties, the Original Shipper undertakes to withdraw the number of Barrels exceeding its Contracted Capacity in Segment 3 with respect to Segment 2 at the Vasconia Station. Breach of this obligation shall lead to the consequences established in this Contract and entitle the Carrier to receive from the Original Shipper, in Segment 2, a quantity of Crude Oil equal to that not withdrawn at the Vasconia Station, save if there is Available Capacity in Segment 3 that can be allocated to it in accordance with the Nomination Process.

 

(vii)  The Effective Capacity of Segment 0 mentioned in (i) above prior to the signature date of the Supplementary Agreement is limited to 68,000 Barrels a day because Crude Oil with high water content is being transported, which will be suspended insofar as the Original Shipper or any Third Party needs to transport high volumes of Crude Oil by Segment 0.

 

(viii)  The Original Shipper recognizes that the Effective Capacity by Segment mentioned in (i) and (ii) may be temporarily affected during the implementation of the Delta 35 Project and all other projects initiated by the Carrier in connection with the need to increase the Effective Capacity of the Oil Pipeline, since such projects will require scheduled shutdowns of the Oil Pipeline that will affect the Service Factor based on which the Effective Capacity mentioned in (i) and (ii) above was calculated. Without prejudice to the above, the Carrier shall make all reasonable efforts to see that the Service Factor is affected as little as possible in connection with the new projects it initiates.

 

(ix)  The Parties understand that in order to comply with the Scheduled Capacity, the Original Shipper will have to adjust the Deliveries to the minimum and maximum daily limits indicated to it by the Carrier, after having previously coordinated with the Original Shipper insofar as possible.

 

2.           Preferential Right

For purposes of allocating the Preferential Right, the Carrier shall observe the following rules:

 

24
 

 

(i)   For all Crude Oil nominations made in exercise of the Preferential Right. For Effective Capacity equal to or less than the Effective Capacity mentioned in subparagraph 1 (i) of this Annex, the Crude Oil nominated in exercise of the Preferential Right shall be transported through the Contracted Capacity of Ecopetrol S.A. as Original Shipper or of the heirs or assignees of said Contracted Capacity.

 

(ii)  The Crude Oil nominated in exercise of the Preferential right with respect to an Effective Capacity greater than the Effective Capacity mentioned in subparagraph 1 (i) of this Annex shall first affect the Effective Capacity exceeding the Effective Capacity mentioned in 1 (i), up to twenty percent (20%) thereof, and subsequently the Contracted Capacity of Ecopetrol S.A. as Original Shipper or the heirs and assignees of said Contracted Capacity pursuant to the above paragraph.

 

3.    Allocation of Contracted Capacity

 

The Carrier shall make its Contracted Capacity for each Segment available to the Original Shipper observing the following rules for allocating the capacity:

 

(i)    Nominations for transporting Cusiana Crude Oil made by the Original Shipper until reaching the Contracted Capacity;

 

(ii)   Other Nominations made by the Original Shipper until reaching its Contracted Capacity.

 

4. Unused Contracted Capacity

 

The Contracted Capacity that has not been nominated by the Original Shipper for a given Operating Month shall be part of the Oil Pipeline’s Available Capacity in the respective Operating Month.

 

5.   Quality specifications for determining Effective Capacity

 

(i) Table No. 1 shows the minimum and maximum quality specifications for the heavy Crude Oil that the Original Shipper shall be obligated to meet for the Deliveries to the Carrier.

 

TABLE No. 1

 

TEST PARAMETER   PARAMETER VALUE   TEST METHOD
         
Water and sediment   Maximum 0.8% by volume  

Water – Karl Fisher ASTM D4377

Sediments – ASTM D473

         
API gravity at 60° F   Equal to or greater than 18 degrees API, but less than 21.1 degrees API.   ASTM – D1298
         
Viscosity at the reference temperature   Maximum 300 cSt at 30°C   ASTM D445

 

25
 

 

 

    Maximum 12.5 lb/square inch    
REID vapor pressure   Reid vapor pressure   ASTM D323
         
Receipt temperature   Maximum 105°F    
         
         
Salt content   Maximum 20 PTB   ATM D 3230
         
Pour point   Maximum at 12°C   ASTM D93
         
Sulfur   Equal to or less than 2% by weight   ASTM D4294
        Fluorescence spectroscopy

 

(ii) Table No. 2 gives the minimum and maximum quality specifications for intermediate or light Crude Oils that the Original Shipper will be obligated to meet for the Deliveries to the Carrier.

 

TABLE No. 2

 

TEST PARAMETER   PARAMETER VALUE   TEST METHOD
         
Water and sediment   Maximum 0.5% by volume  

Water – Karl Fisher ASTM D4377

Sediments – ASTM D473

         
API gravity at 60° F   Equal to or greater than 21.1 degrees API.   ASTM – D1298
         
Viscosity at the reference temperature   Maximum 200 cSt at 30°C   ASTM D445
         
REID vapor pressure   Maximum 12.5 lb/square inch Reid vapor pressure   ASTM D323
         
Receipt temperature   Maximum 105°F    
         
Salt content   Maximum 20 PTB   ATM D 3230
         
Pour point   Maximum at 12°C   ASTM D93
         
Sulfur   Equal to or less than 1.2% by weight  

ASTM D4294

Fluorescence spectroscopy

 

The information contained in the above tables shall be applicable notwithstanding the fact that the Carrier may check parameters such as metals, TAN, etc., through its quality analyses.

 

The volumes entering the Oil Pipeline at each Entry point must comply with the minimum and maximum quality established in the Carrier’s Manual and in this Annex.

 

The Carrier shall not be obligated to receive Crude Oil: (i) that does not comply with the minimum and maximum quality requirements established in this Annex, using the updated versions of the test methods established herein or (ii) whose physical and chemical characteristics mean, in the Carrier’s judgment, that it is not transportable or could materially affect the quality of other Oils transported by the Carrier or the integrity of the Oil Pipeline.

 

26
 

 

In all matters related to the quality requirements for the Oil, what is established the Carrier’s Manual shall apply.

 

Clause Four : Annex C shall read as follows:

 

“ANNEX C”

 

PROCEDURE FOR USE OF THE COVEÑAS TERMINAL

 

1.            For purposes of the use of the Coveñas Terminal, the rules and procedures established in this annex, as well as in the document entitled “OCENSA COVEÑAS TERMINAL OFF-TAKE PROCEDURES” shall be taken into account.

 

2.            With respect to the Over/Under Procedure, which shall only apply to the inventories in the Coveñas Terminal, the Carrier shall not assign a Lay Day under this procedure when the time period required by the Original Shipper to return the Crude Oil that has was loaned to it for loading purposes by another Original Shipper is more than 120 days. To calculate the above time period, the Carrier shall take into account the transportation plan for the next 5 months prepared by the respective Original Shipper, as well as the term of the Contract.

 

3.            If 180 days have elapsed since the date on which the Crude Oil was loaned and the Original Shipper has not returned it, the Original Shipper shall proceed to pay for the Crude Oil not returned, as well as the costs and expenses that must be defrayed for taxes, to the parties indicated by the Carrier. Therefore, the Original Shipper henceforth accepts that the number of Barrels that have been loaned to it shall be those established by the Carrier in the communication informing it of the payment obligation for which it is responsible. The price to be paid by the Original Shipper per Barrel not returned shall be the Declared Value or the price of the Crude Oil on the payment day calculated in the terms established for setting the Declared Value, whichever is greater. In the event of late payment, the Original Shipper shall recognize and pay delinquent interest at an annual rate of Libor +4.

 

Once the payment is made, the Original Shipper shall inform the Carrier with respect thereto so that said situation is reflected in the Coveñas Terminal’s inventories.

 

The Original Shipper recognizes that the Carrier shall not be liable for the return of or payment for the Crude Oil, as applicable.

 

4.       Taking into account that the Coveñas Terminal is a public port, the rules established in this annex, as well as in the Off Take Procedures, shall only be in force until the Coveñas Terminal Regulations for Technical Operating Conditions are approved by the National Infrastructure Agency (hereinafter, ANI) and/or the Carrier sets new rules in this respect. Therefore, the Original Shipper understands and accepts that the Carrier is autonomous in determining the rules that will govern the use of the Coveñas Terminal.

 

27
 

 

That being the case, this Annex shall be replaced insofar as the Carrier updates or issues the applicable regulations for use of the Coveñas Terminal, including but not limited to the Coveñas Terminal Regulations for Technical Operating Conditions. For each update of this annex, the Carrier shall send the Original Shipper a notification as soon as possible, in which it shall include: (i) the date as of which the modification will apply, (ii) the modifications made and, if applicable (iii) a copy of the resolution in which the ANI authorized the modification of the Coveñas Terminal Regulations for Technical Operating Conditions.

 

Clause Five: Nothing indicated in this Supplementary Agreement shall be understood as a modification of the document entitled “Agreement for Capacity Release” signed on October 13, 2009 between the Ocensa Shareholders, the Original Shippers and Ocensa, as it was modified on December 11, 2009.

 

Clause Six: The Parties understand and accept that this Supplementary Agreement does not imply a novation of the Contract or a break in the continuity thereof.

 

Clause Seven : For purposes of implementing the Supplementary Agreement, the Original Shipper and the Carrier shall take into account that:

 

1.      First Nomination under this Supplementary Agreement .

 

The first Nomination made after the signing date of this Supplementary Agreement (hereinafter, the “First Nomination”) shall be made on next suitable date in the nomination process, as established in the Carrier’s Manual, at which time the Contracted Capacity to which this Supplementary Agreement refers shall enter into effect.

 

In accordance with the above, the first Operating Month in which Oil nominated based on the Contracted Capacity will be transported shall be the second calendar month following the signing date of this Supplementary Agreement.

 

2.       Tariff

 

a) From January 18 to January 31, 2013

 

For this period, the Tariff Regulations shall apply, included as Annex C of the Contract before the modification introduced by this Supplementary Agreement, only with regard to the tariff and the recognition and payment of debts.

 

b) As of February 1, 2013

 

The Tariff to which this Supplementary Agreement refers shall apply to the volumes scheduled to be transported as of February first (1), 2013.

 

28
 

 

3.           Pending financial issues

 

a)             In relation to the balances pending payment by the Original Shipper on December 31, 2012 in connection with the invoices for 2011 and 2012 (hereinafter the “Outstanding Invoices”), such sums of money may be paid up to January 31, 2014.

 

With respect to the balances, compensatory interest shall be generated and paid based on the current bank interest rate certified by the Financial Superintendence if payment is made in Colombian pesos, or the annual Libor rate +2 if payment is made in Dollars. In no case shall it exceed the lending interest rate established by Colombian law, or be less than the Consumer Price Index for the preceding calendar year. Interest shall accrue as of January 1, 2013 and the value thereof shall be invoiced monthly by the Carrier and paid by the Original Shipper in the terms established in section 4.2 of the Contract.

 

In any case, should a situation arise involving the Carrier’s cash requirements, the Carrier shall have the right to request payment of all or part of the Outstanding Invoices before the expiration of the term granted for that purpose. For such cases, it shall give notice of said situation to the Original Shipper, who shall have a term of thirty (30) days to pay the invoices. Once said term expires, the Carrier may exercise the rights afforded it in accordance with section 4.3 of the Contract with respect to the Outstanding Invoices for which it requested payment prior to the expiration of the granted term.

 

Similarly, once the term established in this Section 3 (a) for payment of the Outstanding Invoices expires (January 31, 2014), the Carrier shall be entitled to exercise the rights afforded it in accordance with section 4.3 of the Contract, for the equivalent of the sums not paid as of the aforementioned date.

 

Until the Original Shipper’s Outstanding Invoices, if any, have been paid in their entirety, it may not make use of the right contained in Section 6.1 (a) of the Contract, save if the assignment is made to an Affiliate.

 

In any case of temporary assignment, the Carrier shall have the right to terminate the Contract in the terms established in Section 5.2 (b) (iii) thereof if payment of the Outstanding Invoices is not made, an obligation with respect to which the Carrier does not release the assignor.

 

b)            With respect to the balances pending payment by the Carrier at December 31, 2012 corresponding to other Income of the Carrier defined in the Tariff Regulations of the Contract that is modified with this Supplementary Agreement, they shall be paid to the Original Shipper no later than March 31, 2013 in the terms agreed upon between the parties.

 

29
 

 

4.           All other terms established in the Supplementary Agreement shall be applicable as of the signing date hereof.

 

*            *             *             *            *

 

In witness whereof, signed on January seventeenth (17 th ), 2013 in 2 identical originals by those intervening herein.

 

OLEODUCTO CENTRAL S.A.-   ECOPETROL S.A.  
OCENSA      
       
[signature]   [signature]  
Oscar Trujillo Jaramillo   Pedro Rosales Navarro  
ID No. 71,584,158   ID No. 79,505,576  
General Manager   First Alternate to the President  
       
      [initials]

 

30

Exhibit 4.3

Commercial Department    
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 1 of 35
       

 

  Section I - ESTF  

Natural Gas Transportation Contract

 

  Firm Transportation Service  

 

1. Identification

 

Contract Number

 
  ESTF- 029 -2008  

 

2. Transporter

 

2.1 Corporate Name

 

2.2 Tax Identification

  Transportadora de Gas del Interior S.A. E.S.P. 900.134.459-7
 

 

2.3 Legal Representative

2.4 Identification
  JORGE ARMANDO PINEDA SÁNCHEZ 91.241.552 of Bucaramanga
     
3. Shipper 3.1 Corporate Name 3.2 Tax Identification
  ECOPETROL S.A. 899.999.068-1
 

 

3.3 Legal Representative

3.4 Identification
  CAMILO MARULANDA LÓPEZ 10.008.868 of Pereira

 

4. Description

4.1 Entry Hub

1 -

4.2 Exit Hub

  Ballena Barrancabermeja

 

 

4.3 Entry Point 4.4 Exit Point
  1. Outlet flange of the meter located at the Centragas Ballena Station.

1. Outlet flange of the meters located in the 16" line in the COGB unless otherwise agreed by the Parties.

 

2. Hot tap made on the 20" Gas line between Centragas and the COGB located on the property of Petrosantander that transports Gas to the gas turbine of the Barrancabermeja Refinery Department (GRB) owned by the Shipper, unless otherwise agreed by the Parties.

 

 

4.5 Diversion point:

 
  Inlet flange of the scraper trap at the Cuisiana CPF on the Cusiana – El Porvenir – La Belleza gas pipeline  

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

 

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 2 of 35

 

5. Dates and terms
5.1 Contract Date
5.2 Service Commencement Date
  October 1, 2008 December 1, 2012
 

 

5.3 Completion Period

 

5.4 Trial Period

  Until December 31, 2020 None  
6. Capacity 6.1 Contracted Firm Capacity (kcf/d)    
  From December 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 Point 1: 70,000  
 

 

 

Point 2: 17,786  
    Total: 87,786  
  From January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2020 Point 1: 80,000  
 

 

 

Point 2: 20,000  
 

 

 

Total: 100,000    
7. Fees and Contract Price 7.1 Structure of Charges 7.2 Fixed Charge (USD/kcf/d-year)  
  100% F - 0% V 223,558  
 

 

7.3 Variable Charge (USD/kfc)

 

7.4 Fixed Charge for AO&M ($/kcf/d-year)

 
  0 398,349  
 

 

7.5 Reference Capacity Charge

(USD/kcf/d-year)

 

7.6 Daily Reference Capacity Charge (USD/kcf)

 
  126 0.345  
  7.6 Estimated Contract Price USD Pesos($)  
  From December 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 180,513,410 321,649,273,209  

 

8. Addresses

8.1.1 Postal 8.1.2 Telephone  
8.1 Transporter Carrera 34 No 41-51
Bucaramanga
(7) 6320002  
  8.1.3 Fax 8.1.4 E-mail    
  (7) 6320002 Ext 455 sonia.sanabria@tgi.com.co  
8.2 Shipper 8.2.1 Postal 8.2.2 Telephone  
  Carrera 13A No. 87-10 (57)(1)234-4437  
  8.2.3 Fax 8.2.4 E-mail    
  (1) 2344492 ccg@ecopetrol.com.co  
           

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

 

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 3 of 35

 

  8.2.5 Fax for billing  
  (1) 2344500  

 

9. Nature of the Parties  
9.1 The Shipper A decentralized national government agency, created by Statute 165 of 1948 with TIN 899.999.068-1, organized as a Mixed Economy Corporation pursuant to Article 2 of Statute 1118 of 2006, related to the Ministry of Mines and Energy, with registered office in Bogotá D.C., all of whose bylaws are contained in Notarial instrument No. 5314 of December 14, 2007 and the modifications thereto, executed at the Office of Notary Public No. 2 of the Notarial Circuit of Bogotá D.C. and registered with the Chamber of Commerce of Bogotá D.C.
   
9.2 The Transporter A Corporate Provider of Public Services formed on February 16, 2007 by means of notarial instrument No. 67 executed at the office of notary public No. 11 of the notarial circuit of Bucaramanga, registered in the chamber of commerce, business register number 05-138524-04, subject to regulation, supervision, and control by the competent authorities, such as the Energy and Gas Regulation Commission (CREG), the Mining and Energy Planning Unit (UPME), and the Superintendency of Domestic Public Services (SSPD).

 

CHAPTER I

 

GENERAL CONDITIONS

 

1.          IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARTIES

 

The signatories, to wit: 1) JORGE ARMANDO PINEDA SÁNCHEZ , of legal age, identified as shown beneath the signature, acting as First Alternate of the President on behalf and as legal representative of TRANSPORTADORA DE GAS DEL INTERIOR S.A. E.S.P . a Corporate Provider of Public Services formed on February 16, 2007 by means of notarial instrument No. 67 executed at the office of notary public No. 11 of the Bucaramanga circuit, registered with the chamber of commerce on February 19, 2007 with business registration number 05-138524-O4 and TIN 900-134-459-7 and 2) CAMILO MARULANDA LÓPEZ , of legal age, identified with citizenship card number 10.008.868, issued in Pereira, in his capacity as Vice President of Supply and Marketing of ECOPETROL S.A., who, in exercise of the authority contained in the Delegation Manual, is acting in the name, place, and stead of ECOPETROL, S.A., a decentralized national government agency, created by Statute 165 of 1948 with TIN 899.999.068-1, organized as a Mixed Economy Corporation pursuant to Article 2 of Statute 1118 of 2006, related to the Ministry of Mines and Energy, with registered office in Bogotá D.C., all of whose bylaws are contained in Notarial instrument No. 5314 of December 14, 2007 and the modifications thereto, executed at the Office of Notary Public No. 2 of the Notarial Circuit of Bogotá D.C. and registered with the Chamber of Commerce of Bogotá D.C. (hereinafter THE SHIPPER) have entered into the following firm Natural Gas Transportation Contract, contained in the following clauses.

 

2.          RECITALS

 

2.1.       Whereas the TRANSPORTER owns and operates a system of gas pipelines within the country (System), which pass close to the SHIPPER’s facilities.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 4 of 35

  

2.2.          Whereas the Shipper on June 11, 2008 notified the TRANSPORTER of its interest in contracting firm transportation capacity from Ballena to the exit point specified in number 4.4 of Section I ESTF, for which it requires, inter alia, the transportation of natural gas through the Ballena – Barrancabermeja gas pipeline.

 

2.3.          Whereas the TRANSPORTER does not currently have sufficient primary capacity available in the Ballena – Barrancabermeja gas pipeline to meet the SHIPPER’s request and, therefore, as a result of the SHIPPER’s request for capacity, has decided to increase the capacity of said gas pipeline.

 

2.4           Whereas the SHIPPER agrees to enter into the Contract subject to the execution of the increase in capacity that the TRANSPORTER will make in the Ballena – Barrancabermeja gas pipeline.

 

2.5           Whereas the TRANSPORTER and the SHIPPER, on the basis of Article 5.5 of Resolution CREG-001-2000 have freely agreed upon the charges for the remuneration of the natural gas transportation service in accordance with Resolution CREG 125 of 2003.

 

2.6           Whereas in the schedule of transportation fees of this Contract the Parties have agreed to apply 100% of the stamp taxes for branch and main pipelines.

 

2.7           Whereas the SHIPPER has entered into or will enter into the agreements necessary to acquire the volumes of Gas for which it is contracting the Service.

 

2.8           Whereas the Parties recognize and accept that, because Gas Transportation is a complementary public service activity pursuant to Statute 142 of 1994, both this Contract and the transportation service are subject to State regulation, control, and supervision, which may result in modifications to this Contract.

 

2.9           Whereas the SHIPPER has already verified in the Bulletin of Fiscal Debtors prepared and published by the General Accounting Office that the TRANSPORTER is not listed therein as a person who has been declared a tax debtor in a final and unappealable judgment.

 

2.10         Whereas the TRANSPORTER establishes with a clearance certificate issued by its statutory auditor within the month prior to the date of signature hereof, that it is not in arrears with its payments to the health, occupational hazards, and pensions systems, or with its contributions to the Family Subsidy Funds, the Colombian Family Welfare Institute, and the National Apprenticeship Services with regard to any of its employees.

 

2.11         Whereas the representatives of both THE TRANSPORTER and THE SHIPPER are authorized to sign this Contract.

 

2.12         Whereas neither the TRANSPORTER nor THE SHIPPER are legally disqualified from entering into this Contract.

 

2.13         Whereas all the contents hereof and the Exhibits hereto form an integral part of this Contract.

 

2.14         Whereas the TRANSPORTER’s Commercial Committee No. 9 recommended that TGI S.A. E.S.P. enter into this contract.

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 5 of 35

 

3.           DEFINITIONS

 

Whenever terms with an initial capital letter appear (in singular or plural) in this Contract or in the Exhibits, clarification, or modifications hereto, they shall be considered definitions for the purposes hereof and shall have the meanings set forth below, without prejudice to their definitions in the Law:

 

Contract Year   One year of contractual performance. The first Contract Year shall commence on the Service Commencement Date and shall end twelve (12) months later.
     
Firm Capacity   Capacity that, in accordance with the contracts entered into, may not be interrupted by the Transporter, except in cases of emergency or force majeure.
     
Daily Reference Capacity Charge   (Reference Capacity Charge) / 365 in USD/kcf
     
Fixed Charge   Annual charge to pay for the investment costs applicable as from the Service Commencement Date to the Contracted Capacity expressed in US$/kcf/d-year
     
Reference Capacity Charge   The Capacity Charge for the Barrancabermeja - La Dorada Section, applicable to the determination of sanctions payable by the SHIPPER or recognitions payable by the TRANSPORTER in US$/kcf/d-year. This charge is indicated in Section I.
     
AO&M Charge   Annual Fixed Charge to pay for the costs of Administration, Operation, and Maintenance. It is applied to the Contracted Capacity expressed in pesos ($)/kcf/d-year
     
Variable Charge   Charge to pay for the investment cost. It is applied to the volume of Gas transported expressed in USD/kcf.
     
Transportation Nomination Cycle   Process that begins with the request for transportation services made by a Shipper to the Primary Control Center (CPC) concerning the Amount of Energy and the calorific value of the gas that it is going to deliver at the Entry Point and receive at the Exit Point of a Transportation System on a Gas Day and that ends with the Confirmation of the request.
     
Gas Transportation Contract or Contract   The present Contract for the provision of the firm Natural Gas Transportation Service. It includes the following Exhibits: (i) Exhibit I: Quality Specifications of the Natural Gas for Transportation. (ii) Exhibit II: Measurement. (iii) Exhibit III: Guarantee Amount
     
Primary Control Centers (CPC)   Centers belonging to the different gas pipelines (Transportation Systems) that make up the National Transportation System. They are responsible for advancing the operational, commercial, and other processes defined in the Single Code on Natural Gas Transportation (RUT).

 

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 6 of 35

 

Balance Account   The accumulated difference between the Amount of Energy Delivered and the Amount of Energy Taken by a Shipper during one month
     
Diversion   A change at the Entry and/or Exit Points affecting the initial or primary origin or destination specified in this Contract.
     
Gas Day   Official day of the Republic of Colombia running from 00:00 hours until 24:00 hours, during which the Natural Gas Transportation Service is provided by the System in Firm Capacity mode in exchange for payment of the appropriate fee.
     
Service Commencement Date   Day on which the performance of the Contract begins. It is specified in Section I or earlier, depending on the minute signed by the Parties in which they agree to it.
     
Contract Date   Date on which the Contract is executed.
     
Natural Gas or Gas   A mixture of light hydrocarbons mainly consisting of methane that is found in pools in its free form or associated with oil. When necessary, Natural Gas must be treated so that it meets the gas quality conditions specified in the Single Code on Natural Gas Transportation (RUT), and in any standards that supplement, modify, or substitute it.
     
Transportation Gas Pipelines   For the purposes of this Contract it is the Ballena -Barrancabermeja section.
     
GHV   Gross Heating Value of Gas in BTU/CFE.
     
Penalty Interest   The maximum penalty interest rate for commercial transactions authorized under Colombian law for late payment.
     
MBTU   1,000,000 BTU (British Thermal Units) referred to the higher calorific value.
     
Delivery Month   One calendar month during which the SHIPPER has nominated the Service.
     
Entry Hub   Geographical region where the Entry Point is located.
     
Exit Hub   Geographical region where the Exit Point is located.
     
Parties   The SHIPPER and the TRANSPORTER, their assignees and representatives.
     
cf/d, kcf/d, mcf/d   Units of Gas flow measurement, which mean respectively: cubic feet per day, thousands of cubic feet per day, and millions of cubic feet per day.

 

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 7 of 35

 

Completion Period   Period between the Service Commencement Date and the last day of Service.
     
Transportation Schedule   The hourly schedule for the transportation of Amounts of Energy prepared each day by a Primary Control Center in accordance with the Shippers’ Nominations and the technical feasibility of transporting the Nominations in the gas pipelines concerned.
     
Monthly Schedule   The daily gas transportation program for one Month of Deliveries expressed in kcf/d that the SHIPPER must deliver to the TRANSPORTER before the Delivery Month begins.
     
Flow Rate   The SHIPPER’s hourly consumption profile, which the SHIPPER shall specify and update daily within the Transportation Nomination Cycle in the TRANSPORTER’s nominations system.
     
SHIPPER   The Party that contracts the Service
     
Firm Natural Gas Transportation Service or Service   The provision of the Natural Gas Transportation Service through the System in Firm Capacity mode in exchange for payment of the appropriate fee.
     
Transportation System or System   The collection of main and regional gas transportation pipelines and their branch lines, compression stations, connections, and terminals at the city gates, or installations used to provide the Service.
     
Representative Market Rate   The exchange rate between the dollar and the Colombian peso set by the Board of Governors of the Colombian Central Bank or the competent body.
     
TRANSPORTER   The Party that provides the Service.
     
Remaining Value of the Contract   Value of the Contract from the date of early termination until the termination date specified in number 5.3 of Section I - ESTF. Said value is calculated by taking the Contracted Firm Capacity multiplied by the Fixed Daily Charges to pay for the investment plus the Contracted Firm Capacity multiplied by the variable charges, then multiplying both values by the number of days remaining until the termination of the contract and adding the Contracted Firm Capacity times the daily AO&M charged times the number of days remaining until the termination of the contract. The results are expressed in U.S. dollars and Colombian pesos ($) respectively.
     
Exit Variation   Absolute value of the difference between the Amount of Energy Confirmed and the Amount of Energy Taken in each hour by the SHIPPER.

 

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 8 of 35

 

Life of the Contract   Period between the Contract Date and the date on which the Contract settlement document is signed.
     
Authorized Volume   The Volume that the Primary Control Center allows to be transported during a Gas Day by a transportation subsystem or system after studying the nomination made by the SHIPPER.
     
Unaccounted-for Volume   Volume of Gas for which the SHIPPER cannot produce title of ownership or possession when requested to do so by the TRANSPORTER.
     
Volume Delivered by the SHIPPER   The Volume of Gas delivered or to be delivered to the TRANSPORTER at the SHIPPER’s expense and risk and to be taken by the SHIPPER at the Exit Point. This corresponds to the Transportation Volume.
     
Volume Taken by the SHIPPER   Volume of Gas taken by the SHIPPER at the Exit Point

 

4.          GUIDING PRINCIPLES

 

4.2.1       It is in the common interest of the Parties that the Transportation System operates, in respect of reliability, safety, efficiency, continuity, and quality, in the conditions specified in this Contract.

 

4.2.2       The System is an interconnected and interdependent network in which the activity of one of the agents involved in the transportation process may affect the rights of one or more other agents. Accordingly, the main objective of the coordination of this System is to preserve the common interest of the Parties, pursuant to the Contract and the Single Code on Natural Gas Transportation (RUT).

 

4 2.3       The Parties agree to use the Transportation System efficiently, pursuant to the terms of this Contract and the regulations.

 

CHAPTER II

 

PARTICULAR CONDITIONS

 

1.          SUBJECT MATTER

 

The subject matter of this Contract is the provision of the Firm Natural Gas Transportation Service through the System pursuant to the terms and conditions hereof.

 

The transportation capacity contracted by the SHIPPER in the Ballena–Barrancabermeja section will be available as from the Service Commencement Date specified in number 5.2 of Section I ESTF, after the TRANSPORTER has put into operation the facilities that will make it possible to increase the capacity of the Ballena–Barrancabermeja gas pipeline, which it undertakes to do by no later than June first (1st), 2010.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 9 of 35

 

2.          SCOPE

 

The scope of this Contract is the Firm Natural Gas Transportation Service through the System from the Entry Point(s) to the Exit Point(s) specified in Section I – ESTF.

 

3.          APPLICABILITY

 

3.1           Subject to the considerations and terms of this Contract, on each Gas Day as per the assignments of the SHIPPER’s producer and provided that said Service is authorized by the TRANSPORTER pursuant to Chapter III number 4 (Nominations and Confirmed Amount of Energy), the SHIPPER shall deliver to the TRANSPORTER and the TRANSPORTER shall receive at the Entry Point a Delivered Amount of Energy. Said Gas shall be transported by the TRANSPORTER and the SHIPPER shall take the same amount at the Exit Point(s), which amount will be known as Amount of Energy Taken.

 

3.2           On each Gas Day, the SHIPPER shall deliver at the Entry Point and take at the Exit Point the Authorized Amount of Energy, according to the Flow Rate reported by the SHIPPER.

 

3.3           As soon as the gas is delivered to the TRANSPORTER at the Entry Point, the TRANSPORTER may blend said Gas with any other gas provided that the resulting mixture delivered at the Exit Point(s) complies with the quality specifications established in the Regulation for the time being in force, which specifications on the date of the execution of this Contract are those set forth in Exhibit I hereto.

 

4.          SERVICE INITIAL DATE

 

The Service Commencement Date shall be the date specified in number 5.2 of Section I ESTF, once the TRANSPORTER has put into operation the facilities that will make it possible to increase the capacity of the Ballena–Barrancabermeja gas pipeline, which it undertakes to do by no later than June first (1st), 2010.

 

5           ENTRY AND EXIT POINTS

 

The Entry Point(s) and Exit Point(s) are specified in numbers 4.3 and 4.4 of Section I – ESTF of this Contract, as are the obligations to deliver and receive the gas covered by this Contract.

 

6.          TRANSPORTATION CHARGES

 

The charges for provision of the Service covered by this Contract shall be those established in number 7 of Section I – ESTF and in number 2 of Chapter IV and shall be subject to modification by the Energy and Gas Regulation Commission – CREG.

 

7.          TERM OF THE CONTRACT

The term of the Contract is the period between the Service Commencement Date and the last day of the Completion Period, as specified in number 5.3 of Section I – ESTF.

 

8.          NOTICES

 

8.1           All notifications, communications, requests, required or allowed under this Contract must be made in writing and be delivered either personally, by fax, by registered mail or by electronic data transmission to the address specified in number 8 of Section I – ESTF.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 10 of 35

 

8.2           The addresses, fax numbers and e-mail addresses for notifications under this Contract, may be changed by giving the other Party at least fifteen (15) calendar days’ prior written notice.

 

9.          PERFECTION OF THE CONTRACT

 

9.1           This Contract is perfected upon its execution by the representatives of the Parties.

 

10.         TAXES

 

The transportation tax laid down in the Oil Code and in Statute 756 of 2003 and the Infrastructure Development Charge laid down in Article 15 of Law 401 of 1997 and regulated by Decree 3531 of 2004 issued by the National Government shall be paid by the SHIPPER.

 

As a Transportation Contract, this Contract is exempt from stamp tax in accordance with Article 530 number 27 of the Tax Statute Legislative Decree 624 of 1989. Each company shall be responsible for its obligations relating to income tax, industry and commerce tax, or any other type of tax related to this Contract.

 

11.         GUARANTEE

 

By virtue of their legal personalities and their credit and portfolio policies, both Parties agree not to require any kind of guarantee from the other.

 

12.         APPLICABLE LAW

 

This Contract is governed by the Constitution, Statute 142 of 1994, the Commercial Code, the Civil Code, Resolutions adopted by the CREG, and other applicable rules and regulations.

 

In accordance with the aforementioned regulatory framework, this Contract establishes a commercial relationship between the Parties, governed by the relevant provisions of Private Law. With regard to labor workforce, the Parties declare that the workers or contractors hired by each of them for the performance of this Contract have no employment or contractual relationship with the other Party and therefore are not dependent on or subordinate to the other Party. Each Party shall perform this Contract with full autonomy in respect of technical, administrative, financial, and labor matters.

 

13.         REGULATIONS ADJUSTMENTS

 

Both the conditions for provision of the Service and the technical and financial conditions included in this Contract are governed by the regulations issued by the CREG or whichever other body performs its functions. Accordingly if said regulations are modified, the Parties agree to review the conditions hereof in order to accommodate them to the regulations for the time being in force.

 

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 11 of 35

 

14.         DOMICILE

 

For all contractual purposes the designated domicile of the Parties is the city of Bucaramanga, Department of Santander.

 

15.         DELEGATION

 

For the TRANSPORTER, this Contract will be managed by the Commercial Department of TGI S.A. E.S.P. or by whichever department may subsequently be designated for that purpose. The SHIPPER, delegates the management of this Contract and the appointment of the officers that will be in charge of monitoring it to the Gas Manager of ECOPETROL S.A. or to whichever other person the SHIPPER may subsequently appoint.

 

16.         TITLE OF OWNERSHIP OF THE GAS

 

The SHIPPER guarantees that it will enjoy free and clear ownership and possession of the Gas and be entitled to effect delivery of the Gas to the TRANSPORTER when it enters the Transportation System. Ownership of the Gas shall be proven with the assignment of the Agent that delivers Gas to the SHIPPER’s System.

 

17.          INDEMNITY

 

The SHIPPER shall hold the TRANSPORTER harmless from any and all liability and damages that may result from lawsuits, claims, and actions brought in or out of court by third parties disputing the ownership or possession of the Natural Gas transported under this Contract. During the time that the TRANSPORTER has the gas in its custody, the TRANSPORTER shall hold the SHIPPER harmless from any and all liability and damage that may result from lawsuits, claims, and actions related to said gas brought in or out of court by third parties.

 

18.          CUSTODY OF THE GAS

 

The TRANSPORTER shall have custody, possession, and control of the Gas pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Contract and the regulations issued by the Energy and Gas Regulation Commission (CREG), from the time at which it receives the Gas at the Entry Point until the time at which the SHIPPER takes it at the Exit Point.

 

In the event of loss of Gas in the System due to force majeure or Act of God and excusable Event, the loss shall be prorated and borne assume by the different shippers that are using the System. This shall be done taking into account the Gas Balance calculated by the Primary Control Center based on the Confirmed Amount of Energy.

 

Operational losses exceeding 1% shall be borne assume by the TRANSPORTER. Losses of gas that do not exceed 1% will be distributed between the shippers in proportion to the Amount of Energy transported and shall be recognized by said shippers to the TRANSPORTER in the monthly service invoice.

 

19.         CHANGE OF HUBS OR ENTRY AND EXIT POINTS

 

Changes of Hubs or Entry and Exit Points may be made by written agreement between the Parties. New Hubs or Entry and Exit Points may be added in the same way provided that they are technically and operationally feasible and that there is primary Available Capacity in the new gas pipeline sections to be used.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 12 of 35

 

20.          ASSIGNMENT OF THE CONTRACT

 

20.1       The SHIPPER may assign the whole or part of this Contract with the TRANSPORTER’s prior written authorization. The TRANSPORTER may assign the whole or part of this Contract with the SHIPPER’s prior written authorization, and said authorization for the assignment shall not be refused without due cause. If, as a result of the assignment, a performance bond or bank Guarantee has to be furnished by the assignee, the assignment shall only take effect once said Guarantee is approved in writing. The performance bond or bank Guarantee must be issued by an insurance company or bank legally established in Colombia and supervised by the Office of the Financial Superintendent in an amount that will be equal to the value in pesos ($) given by applying the formula contained in Exhibit III.

 

20.2       The authorized assignee must take on all the responsibilities and obligations of the SHIPPER or the TRANSPORTER (as the case may be) under this Contract, and this requirement must be clearly stipulated in the assignment agreement.

 

21.         FORCE MAJEURE OR ACT OF GOD OR EXCUSABLE EVENT

 

21.1       If circumstances of force majeure, acts of God or excusable events arise directly affecting the obligations under this Contract, compliance with said obligations shall be suspended for the period during which the force majeure, act of God or excusable event persists.

 

The Party affected by the event of force majeure, act of God or excusable event shall notify the other Party of said situation within a period of twenty-four (24) hours following the occurrence of same, and undertakes to forward all the details within five (5) business days thereafter.

 

For the purposes of this Contract, force majeure and acts of God shall mean, cover and include, inter alia, the following abnormal acts, facts or events when they are unforeseeable and irresistible, provided they are unrelated to the Parties and occur without cause or negligence, and are duly proven, such as:

 

a)         Acts of nature, including landslides, hurricanes, floods, avalanches, lightning strikes, earthquakes, fires, tsunamis, shipwrecks.

 

b)         Land, air, river or maritime transportation disasters.

 

c)         Acts or omissions by the government or the competent legislative or judicial branch, including laws, agreements, ordinances, orders, rulings, decrees, judgments, legal actions, regulations, issue, renewal or confirmation of permits and licenses, which directly contribute or lead to the inability of one of the Parties to comply with all its obligations, or which seriously and unfairly undermine the interests of one or both Parties or severely compromise their financial capacity.

 

d)         Acts of civil disobedience, including war, blockades, insurrections, mutinies, mass protests, and actions by military forces related or in response to any act of civil disobedience.

 

For the purposes of this Contract, an excusable event shall be any violent act by a third party, including, but not limited to guerrilla or terrorist acts which cause damage to the System or the SHIPPER’S facilities at each Exit Point or which interrupt or delay compliance with the obligations undertaken by the Parties.

 

21.2         The Party affected by the event of force majeure or act of God shall do everything reasonably required to resume as soon as possible compliance with the obligations of the Contract. Likewise, it shall make every effort to minimize or mitigate any delay or additional costs which may be caused.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 13 of 35

 

21.3       The provisions set forth in these clauses shall in no way release the Parties from their obligations prior to the occurrence of the event.

 

22.         DIRECT SETTLEMENT

 

22.1       The Parties agree that in the event that differences arise between them, due to or caused by this Contract, they will seek direct settlement mechanisms, such as direct negotiation or conciliation. For this purpose, the parties shall have a term of sixty (60) business days, as from the date on which either of said parties makes a request in this respect. Said period may be extended by mutual agreement.

 

23.         EARLY TERMINATION OF THE CONTRACT

 

23.1       Either of the Parties may declare early termination when:

 

a)          Due to circumstances of force majeure or act of God or excusable event, the performance of the Contract is totally suspended for a continuous period in excess of three hundred sixty-five (365) calendar days in each event, in which case no liability whatsoever shall be generated for the Parties.

 

b)         By mutual agreement in writing between the parties.

 

23.2      The TRANSPORTER may declare early termination in the following cases:

 

a)         When, more than three (3) times in a period of three hundred sixty-five (365) consecutive calendar days the TRANSPORTER has suspended the Service due to the cause set forth in sub-paragraph c of paragraph 11.3 of Chapter III or when the late payment persists for a period of sixty (60) calendar days, in accordance with paragraph 5 of Chapter IV, except when said late payment is the subject of controversy.

 

b)         When, within a period of three hundred sixty-five (365) calendar days, the SHIPPER has incurred indemnities in an amount which exceeds the Estimated Annual Value of the Contract.

 

23.3       The SHIPPER may declare early termination when, due to causes attributable to the TRANSPORTER, the minimum pressure guarantee set forth in paragraph 9 of chapter III is not maintained for more than fifteen (15) consecutive days or thirty (30) non-consecutive days per Contract year or the Gas is of poor quality.

 

In the event of early termination of the Contract due to causes attributable to either of the Parties, the non-compliant Party shall recognize and pay, as sole indemnity to the other Party by virtue of penalty, a sum equivalent to 100% of the Remaining Value of the Contract.

 

PARAGRAPH: Within a period of ten (10) calendar days following the occurrence of any of the foregoing events, the Party entitled to terminate the Contract shall notify its decision in writing to the other Party, indicating the causes of said determination and the effective termination date of the Contract. The termination of the Contract shall not excuse or relieve the Parties from their respective obligations attributable to the period prior to the effective date of termination.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 14 of 35

 

24.         FULL SETTLEMENT OF THE CONTRACT

 

No later than thirty (30) calendar days following the termination of the Contract Performance Term or, in the event of early termination, the Parties shall sign the respective “Full Settlement Document”, which shall contain a summary of the most significant aspects of the performance of the Contract, indicating the balances in favor of either of the Parties, if any. In the event discrepancies exist in this respect, the Parties shall include applicable evidence and may resort to the dispute resolution mechanisms set forth in paragraph 22 of this Chapter, on the thirty-first (31) calendar day following the date of completion of the Performance Period or early termination. The Full Settlement Document signed by the Parties shall give right of execution.

 

In the event that, two (2) months following the termination of the Contract Performance Period or the Early Termination, the Full Settlement Document mentioned in the preceding paragraph has not been signed, and there is no dispute, the proposed full settlement document shall be forwarded to the address set forth in this Contract, and if no objection is received from the SHIPPER within a period of twenty (20) business days after having sent the proposed full settlement document, it shall be understood to have been approved.

 

CHAPTER III

 

OPERATING CONDITIONS

 

1.          GAS QUALITY

 

1.1           The Gas delivered by the SHIPPER to the TRANSPORTER at the Entry Point and the Gas which the TRANSPORTER delivers to the SHIPPER at the Exit Point shall meet the quality specifications set forth in Exhibit I to this Contract.

 

1.2           If the Gas delivered by the SHIPPER to the TRANSPORTER, in order for the latter to commence the Transportation of same fails to comply with the quality specifications set forth in Exhibit I to this Contract, the TRANSPORTER shall notify the former of the quality deficiency and shall have the right but not the obligation to reject said Gas while the situation is being rectified. If, within a period of no more than three (3) calendar days, the SHIPPER fails to remedy the quality deficiency, the TRANSPORTER, at its discretion and without being obligated to do so by virtue of this Contract, may: (i) carry out the activities permitting it to accept said Gas, in which event the SHIPPER shall reimburse the TRANSPORTER for the additional costs incurred by the latter by virtue of said activities, the estimate for which shall be agreed to in advance, or (ii) reject the Gas for transportation. In this case, the liability of the SHIPPER shall terminate with the payment of the additional costs incurred by the TRANSPORTER.

 

1.3           In the event the Gas delivered by the TRANSPORTER to the SHIPPER is not in compliance with the quality specifications set forth in Exhibit I to this Contract due to circumstances attributable exclusively to the transportation, the SHIPPER shall notify it of the quality deficiency and shall have the right to reject said Gas until such time as the situation is remedied, which shall be notified in advance to the TRANSPORTER, and which shall be considered a failure of service with the same consequences as those set forth in paragraph 10 of chapter III. In the event that within a period of no more than three (3) calendar days, the TRANSPORTER fails to remediate the quality deficiency, the SHIPPER may, at its discretion, and without being obligated to do so by virtue of this Contract, carry out the activities permitting it to accept said Gas, in which event the TRANSPORTER shall reimburse the SHIPPER the additional costs which in fact were incurred by such activities, the estimate for which shall be agreed to in advance. In this case the liability of the TRANSPORTER shall terminate with the payment of the additional costs incurred by the SHIPPER.

 

1.4           The SHIPPER is responsible for arranging for the equipment required at the Entry Point for the volumetric metering and determination of the gas quality.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 15 of 35

 

In the event that, in the judgment of the SHIPPER, it needs to perform volumetric metering and gas quality determination at the Exit Point, the SHIPPER shall arrange, at its own expense, for the equipment necessary for the respective calibration after reaching agreement with the TRANSPORTER on the procedures to be followed.

 

1.5           The verification of the Gas quality, both at the Entry Point and the Exit Point shall be performed by the TRANSPORTER, but the SHIPPER reserves the right to witness the sampling and analysis. All this may be carried out notwithstanding the SHIPPER’S responsibility to deliver Gas to the TRANSPORTER at the Entry Point outside the quality specifications established in accordance with this Contract. Likewise, the TRANSPORTER shall verify the minimum variables determined in the RUT, the SHIPPER being responsible for ensuring permanent and continuous compliance with all Natural Gas quality specifications set forth in this Contract for its delivery at the Entry Point.

 

2.          GAS METERING

 

2.1         The SHIPPER is responsible for arranging, both at the Entry Point, through its Producer –Supplier and at the Exit Point, all items necessary for the installation, operation and maintenance of the metering system, including calibration.

 

2.2         The installation of the metering systems shall be carried out as follows:

 

2.2.1       EXIT POINT 1 METERING

 

Until otherwise agreed to between the Parties, the Exit Point 1 metering system shall be located at the TRANSPORTER’S COGB. Its technical and operating characteristics shall be agreed to in a document signed by the Parties prior to the Service Commencement Date, which document shall form an integral part of this Contract.

 

In the event that the Exit Point 1 metering system and skid, installed and conditioned by the TRANSPORTER at its COGB, continues to be the official meter, the SHIPPER shall pay a lease, administration, operation and maintenance charge for said system and metering skid, which shall be agreed to prior to the Service Commencement Date, by means of a Lease, Operation and Maintenance Agreement executed between the TRANSPORTER and the SHIPPER’S Barrancabermeja Refinery Management.

 

In the event that the SHIPPER elects to install a meter at a location other than the COGB, initially established by the TRANSPORTER, the installation of said meter shall be agreed to in advance between the Parties, taking into account that it shall be carried out immediately after Exit Point 1, with the prior acceptance by the SHIPPER of the costs and investments which have not been or cannot be recovered, and those which in fact were incurred by the TRANSPORTER for the construction and conditioning of the metering system and skid located at Exit Point 1 and for which respective supporting documents shall be provided.

 

In the event that it is possible for the SHIPPER to install the official Exit Point 1 meter within the COGB, it shall pay the TRANSPORTER for the lease of the land occupied by said meter.

 

2.2.2        EXIT POINT 2 METERING

 

Unless otherwise agreed to between the Parties, the Exit Point 2 metering system shall be located in the Petrosantander facilities or in the TRANSPORTER’S COGB. The technical and operating characteristics of said meter shall be established by means of a document signed by the Parties prior to the Service Commencement Date, which document shall form an integral part of this Contract.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 16 of 35

 

In the event that the installation and conditioning of the Exit Point 2 metering system is carried out by the TRANSPORTER in the COGB, the TRANSPORTER shall charge the SHIPPER a lease, administration, operation and maintenance fee for the metering system and skid, which shall be formalized by means of a Lease, Operation and Maintenance Agreement executed between the TRANSPORTER and THE SHIPPER’S Barrancabermeja Refinery Management. The installation and conditioning of this metering system may be carried out by the TRANSPORTER, following validation and approval by the SHIPPER of the procedure for the execution of such activities, as well as the assurance that the performance of said activities does not involve any risk for the storage of the gas and the continuous operation of the Barrancabermeja Refinery owned by the SHIPPER, for which purpose a detailed risk analysis shall be carried out by the Parties within a period of twenty (20) calendar days as from the delivery of the pertinent documentation by the TRANSPORTER to the SHIPPER.

 

In the event that, following the date of execution of the Exit Point 2 metering system and skid lease, operation and maintenance contract, the SHIPPER elects to install a meter at a location other than the COGB, the installation and conditioning of that system shall be agreed to in advance between the Parties, taking into account that same shall be carried out immediately after Exit Point 2, with the prior acceptance by the SHIPPER of the costs and investments which have not been or may not be recovered, and which the TRANSPORTER in fact incurred in the construction and conditioning of the meter located at Exit Point 2 in the COGB, and for which the pertinent supporting documents shall be submitted.

 

The type of meter to be installed in either case shall be agreed to between the Parties.

 

In the event that, on the Service Commencement Date, the Exit Point 2 metering system is not available, the natural gas imbalances as from the Service Commencement Date until such time as said system is installed and operational shall be assumed by the SHIPPER, and shall be calculated as the difference between the volumetric Gas measurements between the Centragas meters on the high pressure line, Meriléctrica and the inlet to the TRANSPORTER’S COGB.

 

In those cases in which the TRANSPORTER installs and conditions the metering systems and skids, it must possess the hardware necessary for the SHIPPER to obtain information on line regarding the gas metering in its facilities, provided that the communications protocols are compatible.

 

2.3           The obligation to read the meters and verify their calibration both at the Entry Point and at the Exit Points lies with the TRANSPORTER. The SHIPPER reserves the right to be present during the verification of the meter calibration and for this purpose shall be notified by THE TRANSPORTER with at least seventy-two (72) hours advance notice. The SHIPPER reserves the right to be present at the calibration verification of the TRANSPORTER’S meters installed in Centragas, Meriléctrica and the COGB (gas to the Central-Eastern Gas Pipeline) related to the gas balance and for this purpose shall be notified by the TRANSPORTER with at least seventy-two (72) hours advance notice.

 

2.4           The determination of volumetric quantities shall be carried out in accordance with the calculation methods established by the manufacturer in the specific manuals for each type of meter and the recommendations of the American Gas Association AGA.

 

2.5           In the event that it is verified that the SHIPPER or the TRANSPORTER has engaged in fraud in the connections or metering equipment, the TRANSPORTER or the SHIPPER, as may be the case, may suspend the service and impose a penalty on the other Party for 100% of the value of such fraud, notwithstanding the provisions set forth in the RUT and the filing of the pertinent legal actions. The value of the fraud shall be determined subsequently.

 

2.6           The cost associated with the installations necessary for the SHIPPER to receive the gas as of the Exit Point, including its construction, operation and maintenance, shall be borne by the SHIPPER.

 

2.7           The metering equipment shall be in compliance with metering and calibration regulations and standards currently in force.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 17 of 35

 

3.          TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS

 

No later than three (3) business days prior to the end of the month preceding the Deliveries Month the SHIPPER shall send to the TRANSPORTER the estimated average transportation requirements for the six (6) months following the Deliveries Month.

 

4.          NOMINATIONS AND CONFIRMED AMOUNT OF ENERGY

 

The Nominations for each hour of the Gas Day shall be made in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Single Code on Natural Gas Transportation (RUT) or subsequent modifications thereto.

 

4.1         The SHIPPER shall deliver to the TRANSPORTER the Nomination for each hour of the Gas Day by electronic data transmission prior to 04:20 pm on the day prior to the Gas Day on which it carries out the Nomination. In the event of communication problems, the SHIPPER shall deliver the Nomination via fax or e-mail.

 

4.2         In the event the TRANSPORTER does not receive the hourly Nomination from the SHIPPER or if said Nomination is not transmitted in accordance with the terms and periods stipulated, the nomination included in the Monthly Schedule shall be considered to be the Nomination for that Gas Day, and said Schedule shall remain in force until such time as the SHIPPER delivers a new Nomination.

 

4.3         The TRANSPORTER shall totally or partially accept the Nomination in accordance with the conditions set forth in this Contract, taking into account that in those cases in which the SHIPPER nominates quantities which are lower or equivalent to the Firm Contracted Capacity, the Authorized Amount of Energy shall be at least the Nominated Quantity. In the event said nomination is higher than the Firm Contracted Capacity, the Authorized Amount of Energy shall be as a minimum the Firm Contracted Capacity. The TRANSPORTER shall notify the SHIPPER by electronic data transmission prior to 4:20 p.m., with respect to the viable Natural Gas Transportation Schedule and the Authorized Amount of Energy. In the event of communication problems, this shall be done by fax. In the event the TRANSPORTER fails to notify the Authorized Amount of Energy in a timely manner, the Authorized Amount of Energy shall be understood to be the Nominated Amount of Energy. After having received this communication, and no later than 6:50 p.m. on the same day, the SHIPPER shall forward to the TRANSPORTER a Confirmed Amount of Energy for an Amount of Energy which is less than or equal to the Authorized Amount of Energy. In the event the TRANSPORTER does not receive a Confirmed Amount of Energy within the period mentioned or if the Confirmed Amount of Energy is greater than the Authorized Amount of Energy, the Confirmed Amount of Energy shall be considered to be the Authorized Amount of Energy.

 

The TRANSPORTER shall forward to the SHIPPER its gas transportation schedule prior to 8:20 p.m.

 

If, due to causes attributable to the SHIPPER, the stability of the Transportation System is affected, the SHIPPER shall assume the cost for which it is proportionally liable of the damages caused to the TRANSPORTER and the other System Agents by virtue of said situation. In order to determine the final liability of the SHIPPER, it shall be necessary to verify the SHIPPER’S consumption as well as that of the other shippers against the nomination which each of them shall submit, as set forth in the RUT. The TRANSPORTER shall supply all the information necessary to carry out this analysis.

 

The SHIPPER shall guarantee that the gas consumption rate in its facility is maintained at all times within the operating limits of the metering system installed. In the event the consumption rate is outside the meter range, or is outside the operating limits, the SHIPPER shall indemnify the TRANSPORTER for the gas which is not metered and shall be responsible for the operating problems caused by such situation. The Parties agree that in order to determine the quantity of power consumed which could not be metered, a power balance shall be carried out on each of the Exit Points indicated under paragraph 4.4 of Section I, taking into account the following meters:

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 18 of 35

 

For Exit Point 1, the meters installed in Centragas for the low pressure line (FQI-3-02 and FQI-3-03)m, gas meter to Ferticol (UPBM-11) and gas meter to Gases de Barrancabermeja (UPBM-10).

 

For Exit Point 2, the meters installed in Centragas for the high pressure line (FQI-3-01 and FQI-3-04), Meriléctrica meter (UPBM-12) and gas meter to the Central-Eastern gas pipeline (UPBM-02).

 

In addition, if the SHIPPER needs to increase its consumption capacity (both pressure and volume increase), it shall assume all the costs required to carry out the Exit Point and Connection.

 

PARAGRAPH 1: The Parties agree that the schedules and the Nomination process may be modified in the future, based on the provisions established by the CREG on the matter.

 

5.        CALCULATION FOR VARIATIONS

 

During the first twenty (20) calendar days of each month following the Deliveries Month, the TRANSPORTER shall calculate the SHIPPER’S Output Variation for each Gas Day of the Deliveries Month.

 

6.        COMPENSATION FOR VARIATIONS

 

When the cases referred to in this paragraph arise, the TRANSPORTER may notify and coordinate with the SHIPPER the operating corrections necessary in order to rectify the Shipper’s Output Variation. Compliance with the agreement will exonerate the SHIPPER from compensations.

 

In the event that the SHIPPER fails to apply the operating corrections to the satisfaction of the TRANSPORTER, it shall apply the compensation set forth below:

 

For each hour of the Deliveries Month Gas Day, when the SHIPPER’S Output Variation exceeds 4% of the Confirmed Amount of Energy, the SHIPPER shall pay a charge equivalent to five (5) times the Reference Capacity Daily Charge multiplied by the volume equivalent to the excess in the Output Variation in excess of 4%.

 

These payments shall not grant the SHIPPER the right to incur Output Variations.

 

When the CREG approves the tables of Compensation for Output Variations caused by the SHIPPER, they shall begin to be applied and shall replace those initially stated. Said compensation shall be calculated daily and shall be invoiced monthly, as set forth in paragraph 3 of Chapter IV.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 19 of 35

 

7.          BALANCE ACCOUNT

 

7.1         During the first twenty (20) calendar days of each month following the Deliveries Month, the TRANSPORTER shall calculate the Power Imbalances for the Deliveries Month. The Energy Balance Account shall be updated daily in accordance with the measurements made by the TRANSPORTER.

 

7.2         The SHIPPER undertakes to supply to the TRANSPORTER the information requested from it by the latter when it considers necessary and which the SHIPPER is able to supply, for the purpose of calculating the Imbalances. At the discretion of the TRANSPORTER, this information shall be provided in electronic format.

 

7.3         The TRANSPORTER shall maintain the SHIPPER’S Balance Account duly updated.

 

8.          COMPENSATION FOR IMBALANCES

 

In the event that the Power Imbalance exceeds 0.5% in the Deliveries Month, the TRANSPORTER may first seek to reach an agreement with the SHIPPER with respect to the accounting procedures to be followed, in order to handle, reconcile and eliminate the Power Imbalances. In the event that said situation is not rectified to the satisfaction of the TRANSPORTER, the TRANSPORTER may require the SHIPPER to pay, by way of indemnity, a sum equal to the excess multiplied by the Reference Capacity Daily Charge.

 

Such payment shall not grant the SHIPPER the right to incur Power Imbalances.

 

PARAGRAPH I. The amounts paid for each Deliveries Month by virtue of Indemnities owed by the SHIPPER shall be invoiced monthly together with the amount of the Service, as set forth in paragraph 3 of Chapter IV.

 

9.          PRESSURE AT THE ENTRY AND EXIT POINTS

 

9.1         The TRANSPORTER shall make available to the SHIPPER the Gas at the Exit Point at the minimum defined pressure of 350 Psig.

 

9.2         From the Exit Point onward, the SHIPPER shall take the measures necessary to guarantee its capacity to take from the system the volume of the transportation capacity contracted.

 

9.3         The SHIPPER, through its producer, shall make the necessary arrangements for the Gas to enter the system at the Entry Point without exceeding the maximum operating pressure defined as 1200 psig. The TRANSPORTER may decline to receive Gas which is not in compliance with this pressure requirement.

 

10.        NON-COMPLIANCE DUE TO LOW PRESSURE OR POOR GAS QUALITY AT THE EXIT POINT

 

In the event that the pressure at the Exit Point is lower than the minimum pressure defined in paragraph 9 of this Chapter, and for this reason the SHIPPER is unable to receive the amount of Power confirmed, or in the event that the SHIPPER elects to exercise the right not to receive the Gas in accordance with paragraph 1.3 of Chapter III, the procedure below shall be followed:

 

10.1       The TRANSPORTER shall not make any charge whatsoever for the difference between the Authorized Volume and the Volume Received by the SHIPPER.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 20 of 35

 

10.2       The SHIPPER shall have the right to request in the Nomination, within a period of (60) calendar days following the date on which the non-compliance arises at the Exit Point, an Amount of Energy in excess of the Nominated Amount of Energy for the same quantity as the Amount of Energy Not Received, under the conditions set forth in paragraph 4 of this Chapter, provided this does not affect other shippers who have engaged the Firm Service. For each day on which the TRANSPORTER fails to accept the nomination of the amount of energy not received by the SHIPPER, the aforementioned 60-day period shall be extended by one additional day.

 

10.3       The SHIPPER shall have the right to have the TRANSPORTER recognize the following items:

 

a)          Payment of the penalties, surcharges, indemnities and/or excess costs actually incurred by the SHIPPER with respect to its clients and/or the GCB, as a direct consequence of the events set forth in this clause.

 

b)          The value of the investments or expenses actually incurred by the SHIPPER to carry out the work necessary to make good or replace the amount of Gas not transported as a direct consequence of the events set forth in this clause.

 

PARAGRAPH 1: The Transporter shall deduct the foregoing items from the next transportation invoice.

 

11.         SUSPENSION

 

11.1         The Parties may, by mutual accord, suspend the obligations set forth in this Contract.

 

11.2         The SHIPPER may suspend its obligations in the following cases:

 

a)           For maintenance of its facilities for a period of no more than seven hundred twenty (720) consecutive or non-consecutive hours at each Exit Point during each Contract Year. For this purpose, the SHIPPER shall notify its maintenance schedule to the TRANSPORTER monthly.

 

b)          Due to force majeure or act of God or excusable event.

 

c)          Due to the inspection and maintenance activities of its meters at the Exit Points, which affect the gas flow to the SHIPPER, for the duration of such activities.

 

11.3       The TRANSPORTER may suspend its obligations in the following cases:

 

a)          To carry out technical repairs or maintenance at the facilities which form a part of the System, for a period of no more than seven hundred twenty (720) consecutive or non-consecutive hours at each Exit Point per Contract year. To this effect, the TRANSPORTER shall notify its maintenance schedule monthly to the SHIPPER, which schedule shall be sent by no later than the last business day of the Month prior to the month during which the maintenance is to be performed, indicating the date, duration and estimated capacity of the maintenance.

 

b)          Due to force majeure, act of God or excusable event.

 

c)          Due to delinquency in any payment by the SHIPPER in excess of ten (10) calendar days, except when such payment is the subject of dispute.

 

d)          Due to failure to renew on a timely basis the guarantees required by the TRANSPORTER, or to submit the premium payment certificate, in the event that this contract is assigned by the SHIPPER.

 

11.4        The events set forth in sub-paragraphs a) and b) of paragraphs 11.2 and 11.3 shall suspend the obligations of both Parties. The provisions set forth in this paragraph 11 shall not exempt the Parties from their payment obligations caused up to the time of the suspension.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 21 of 35

 

11.5         Except in unforeseen cases, the suspending Party shall notify the suspension to the other Party with at least forty-eight (48) hours advance notice. In unforeseen cases, the notification shall be made as quickly as possible.

 

11.6         The suspension shall cease when the cause which originated it ceases, for which purpose the suspending Party shall notify the other Party of the cessation of the suspension and the Contract shall be automatically resumed under the terms in force prior to the suspension.

 

11.7         Any non-compliance or delay in compliance of any obligation related to the metering for which the SHIPPER is responsible for a period in excess of 30 calendar days shall likewise be cause for suspension of the Service.

 

CHAPTER IV

 

FINANCIAL CONDITIONS

 

1.          APPLICABILITY OF THE SERVICE

 

The SHIPPER may require the Service described herein each Gas Day during the Contract Performance Period. To this effect, Nominations shall be made as described in paragraph 4 of Chapter III. The Service shall not be subject to restrictions or interruptions except as set forth in paragraph 11 of Chapter III, provided the SHIPPER is able to demonstrate at the request of the TRANSPORTER that it has title to the volume of Gas to be transported, which requirement shall be verified in accordance with the provisions set forth in Paragraph 16 of Chapter II of this Contract. In the event that the SHIPPER is unable to comply with this condition, the SHIPPER shall be considered in breach for an amount equivalent to the Volume Deficiency and the TRANSPORTER shall have the right to refrain from authorizing the Service up to a volume equivalent to the Volume Deficiency.

 

The TRANSPORTER shall not be obligated to transport a volume of Gas greater than the Firm Contracted Capacity, unless it has agreed to do so during the Transportation Nomination Cycle.

 

PARAGRAPH: Occasional Transportation

 

A.           At its discretion, the TRANSPORTER may authorize the transportation of volumes in excess of the Firm Contracted Capacity for a specific Gas Day, in accordance with the SHIPPER’s request within the Nomination process, which shall be invoiced as indicated in paragraphs 2.3 and 2.4 hereinbelow.

 

2.           CHARGES

 

2.1         The charges caused by this Contract include the Fixed Charge, Variable Charge and AO&M Fixed Charge set forth in Section I-ESTF.

 

2.2         The value of the Service during the Deliveries Month; and which is invoiced monthly corresponds to the sum of the three items.

 

2.2.1       Fixed Charge, equivalent to the Firm Contracted Capacity multiplied by one twelfth of the Fixed Charge described in paragraph 7.1 of section I-ESTF for the respective Transportation Gas Pipeline. The Fixed Charge shall be applicable as from the Service Commencement Date, regardless of whether it is used or not.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 22 of 35

 

2.2.2         Variable Charge, which is equivalent to the Volumes Delivered by the SHIPPER, multiplied by the Variable Charge described in paragraph 7.2 of Section I-ESTF for the respective Transportation Gas Pipeline. The Variable Charge shall be applicable as from the Service Commencement Date.

 

2.2.3         AO&M Fixed Charge, equivalent to the Firm Contracted Capacity, multiplied by one twelfth of the AO&M Fixed Charge described in paragraph 7.3 of Section I-ESTF for the respective Transportation Gas Pipeline. The AO&M Fixed Charge shall be applicable as from the Service Commencement Date, regardless of whether or not it is used.

 

2.3           In the event that, for any Gas Day, the TRANSPORTER authorizes an average daily transportation greater than the Firm Contracted Capacity as set forth in the Single Paragraph of paragraph 1 of this Chapter, the transportation of this greater daily volume shall have a special charge in dollars and a special charge in pesos of USD 0.793/kpc plus USD1.091/kpc corresponding to the maximum rate of the 0% fixed - 100% variable pair set forth in CREG Resolution 125 of 2003. The preceding charges are as of December 31, 2007 applicable to the year 2008.

 

2.4           The Charge Amounts set forth in dollars shall be taken to three (3) decimal places as follows: if the fourth decimal place is less than 5, the third decimal place is maintained, and if the fourth decimal place is greater than or equal to 5, the third decimal place is increased by 1, and the charge amounts expressed in pesos shall be taken in round numbers, which figures shall be updated in accordance with the provisions set forth in paragraphs 5.7 and 5.8 of Article 5 of CREG Resolution 001 dated January 20, 2000.

 

2.5           The TRANSPORTER agrees that, in the event it has primary capacity available at a better rate than that agreed to in this Contract, it will apply said rate to the SHIPPER as of the date on which it starts to apply said rate to third parties, notwithstanding that the parties may execute agreements between themselves or with third parties to promote market growth, in which event said conditions shall not affect the rates of this contract.

 

2.6           In the event that the TRANSPORTER’S Policy for the interruptible transportation establishes interruptible transportation rates lower than those agreed to in this contract, the TRANSPORTER shall adjust the charges to the SHIPPER, deducting from the fixed charges to be paid by the SHIPPER the amount of the income obtained by the TRANSPORTER under the interruptible transportation modality and for a capacity equivalent to the lesser amount between the capacity not sold by the SHIPPER and the capacity sold as interruptible by the TRANSPORTER. In order to comply with the provisions set forth in this paragraph, the SHIPPER undertakes to publish daily in the TRANSPORTER’S Electronic Operations Bulletin (BEO) its surpluses of capacity for resale.

 

PARAGRAPH: The provisions set forth in the preceding paragraph shall not apply when the TRANSPORTER wishes to develop or promote a specific market, previously approved by an institutional policy of the TRANSPORTER.

 

3.          INVOICING

 

3.1         The TRANSPORTER shall invoice monthly the amount of the Service, the indemnities caused by Output Variations, Imbalances, gas losses and other services during the prior Deliveries Month, in Colombian pesos, utilizing for the invoicing of the portion of the charges established in dollars, the representative market rate certified by the Bureau of Finance for the last day of the month in which the transportation is carried out.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 23 of 35

 

3.2         The invoice shall be based on the sum total of the Daily Amounts Requested and Accepted by the SHIPPER at the Entry Point.

 

3.3         The invoice must contain the minimum requirements set forth in the Single Code on Natural Gas Transportation ( RUT) and, once issued by the TRANSPORTER, shall be enforceable per se.

 

3.4         For the purposes of invoicing the solidarity contribution factor to the SHIPPER, the TRANSPORTER shall use the information for the month immediately prior to the Delivery Month, and shall make the respective adjustments to the billing the following month.

 

3.5         For all the purposes of this Contract, the invoice shall be considered delivered by the TRANSPORTER to the SHIPPER on the date on which it is forwarded electronically or by fax to the fax number recorded for that purpose in Section I – ESTF. The TRANSPORTER shall simultaneously submit the original invoices with their respective supporting documentation by registered mail, not later than the calendar day following the fax transmission. Failure to send the original invoice within the established timeframe shall result in an extension of the payment term for a period equal to that of the delay.

 

4.          PAYMENTS

 

The SHIPPER shall pay the invoice in the place and manner that the TRANSPORTER designates for that purpose, in Colombian pesos, no more than fifteen (15) calendar days after the invoice is delivered.

 

If the SHIPPER disputes an invoice or part of it or one of its line items before the payment due date, the SHIPPER may abstain from paying the disputed sum, stating the grounds for the rejection. If the Parties reach an agreement regarding the disputed amount within the next eight (8) business days, and if the dispute is resolved in favor of the TRANSPORTER, the SHIPPER shall pay the amount owed not later than the ninth (9 th ) business day following resolution of the dispute, with the corresponding penalty interest, if appropriate.

 

If the Parties do not reach an agreement regarding the disputed amount, the SHIPPER must pay, at a minimum, the undisputed amount of the invoice corresponding to the transportation service provision in the same period established above and may, once the payment is made, resort to the procedures set forth in Chapter II, paragraph 22.

 

Should the SHIPPER prevail in the claim, the TRANSPORTER must repay the overpaid amount, if any, within the five (5) business days following the mutual agreement or judicial decision, as the case may be, with the corresponding penalty interest from the date on which the payment was made.

 

Should the TRANSPORTER prevail in the claim, the SHIPPER must pay the sum pending payment, if any, plus the penalty interest for the unpaid amount from the due date of the invoice containing the disputed sum until the corresponding decision is issued. The payment shall be made within five (5) business days following the decision that settles the dispute.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 24 of 35

 

5.          DEFAULT

 

If the Party obligated to do so does not pay on the dates fixed for that purpose any sum owed to the other Party pursuant to the provisions of this Contract, it shall pay Default Interest. Default Interest shall be applied to the balance of the sum owed in pesos and in proportion to the time transpired from the date on which the payment should have been made, according to the stipulations herein, until the date on which the payment is made.

 

When the SHIPPER defaults, the TRANSPORTER shall have the right to suspend the Service as of the eleventh (11 th ) calendar day of the default. If the default continues for fifty (50) more calendar days, the TRANSPORTER may terminate the Contract and enforce the guarantees, should this Contract be assigned by the SHIPPER.

 

PARAGRAPH: The debtor shall be considered in default without the need for any formal notice.

 

6.          ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE CONTRACT

 

It is considered equal to the Contracted Firm Capacity multiplied by the Fixed Charges that compensate the investment plus the Contracted Firm Capacity multiplied by the variable charges for three hundred sixty-five (365) days and the Contracted Firm Capacity for the AO&M expenses, expressed in U.S. dollars and in Colombian pesos ($).

 

7.          DISCOUNTS ON THE FIXED CHARGE

 

7.1         If during the Performance Period of the Contract the Excusable Events, Force Majeure, or Acts of God set forth in Chapter II, number 21, occur, or the TRANSPORTER fails to deliver to the SHIPPER the Authorized Volume in an amount equal to the Contracted Firm Capacity, the TRANSPORTER shall give the SHIPPER a discount, in dollars and pesos, for each Gas Day the events or failures are in effect, according to the following formula:

 

Discount in dollars = [Contracted Firm Capacity (kcf/d) – Volume Received by the SHIPPER (kcf/d)] x (Fixed Charge (USD/kcf/d-year) / 365 days)

 

Discount in pesos = [Contracted Firm Capacity (kcf/d) – Volume Received by the SHIPPER (kcf/d)] x (Charge for AO&M (Pesos ($)/kcf/d-year) / 365 days).

 

7.2         If the TRANSPORTER refuses to accept delivery of the SHIPPER’s Gas or restricts the SHIPPER’s deliveries based on the right of refusal in Chapter III, paragraph 1, regarding Gas Quality, the TRANSPORTER shall not be obligated to provide any Fixed Charge discount.

 

7.3         Likewise, in the event the Contract obligations are suspended under the terms of Chapter III, paragraph 11, by either of the Parties, this shall give rise to a discount on the fixed charges corresponding to both pesos and dollars, with regard to the capacity that the TRANSPORTER did not have available, applied as follows:

 

Discount in dollars = [Contracted Firm Capacity (kcf/d) – Available Firm Volume that the TRANSPORTER reported during the maintenance (kcf/d)] x (Fixed Charge (USD/kcf/d-year) / 365 days)

 

Discount in pesos = [Contracted Firm Capacity (kcf/d) – Available Firm Volume that the TRANSPORTER reported during the maintenance (kcf/d)] x (Charge for AO&M (Pesos ($)/kcf/d-year) / 365 days).

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 25 of 35

 

8.          SIGNATURES

 

In witness whereof, the Parties sign this Contract in two originals with identical content, on October first (1 st ), 2008.

 

The Transporter   The Shipper
     
[signature]   [signature]
JORGE ARMANDO PINEDA SÁNCHEZ   CAMILO MARULANDA LÓPEZ
C.C. [Citizen ID] 91.241.552 of Bucaramanga   C.C. 10.008.868 of Pereira
    [initials]
[initials]    

 

Prepared by: DCO/Maria C. Gomez G.
Reviewed by: DCO/Sonia R. Sanabria M.
  SEG/Luis M. Carvajal A.
Approved by: PRE/Jorge A. Pineda S.

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 26 of 35

 

EXHIBIT I

 

SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING NATURAL GAS

 

TO BE TRANSPORTED VIA A GAS PIPELINE

 

SPECIFICATIONS   International System   British System
Minimum Gross Heating Value (GHV). (Note 1)   35.4 MJ/m3   950 BTU/ft3
Maximum Gross Heating Value (GHV). (Note 1)   42.8 MJ/m3   1,150 BTU/ft3
Liquid content. (Note 2)   Free of liquids   Free of liquids
Total maximum H2S content   6 mg/m3   0.25 grain/100 cfs
Total maximum sulphur content   23 mg/m3   1.0 grain /100 cfs
CO2 content, maximum, in % volume   2%   2%
N2 content, maximum, in % volume   3%   3%
Inert content, maximum, in % volume. (Note 3)   5%   5%
Oxygen content, maximum, in % volume   0.1%   0.1%
Maximum water vapor content   97 mg/m3   6.0 lb/mcfs
Delivery temperature, maximum   49 ºC   120 ºF
Delivery temperature, minimum   7.2 ºC   45 ºF
Maximum content of dust and suspended material. (Note 4)   1.6 mg/m3   0.7 grain/1000 cf

 

Note 1: All data regarding cubic meters or cubic feet of gas refer to Standard Conditions, that is, 14.65 psia and 15.6 ºC (60 ºF),

 

Note 2: Liquids may be: hydrocarbons, water, and other contaminants in liquid state.

 

Note 3: The sum of the contents of CO2, nitrogen, and oxygen are considered inert contents.

 

Note 4: The maximum particle size is 15 microns.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 27 of 35

 

EXHIBIT II

 

MEASUREMENT

 

The purpose of this Exhibit is to establish a general guide for the design, installation, operation, calibration, and maintenance of the gas measurement systems that are used for transfer of custody.

 

It summarizes the minimum requirements that must be met to guarantee measurement quality and reliability, enabling the systems to be within the margins of error that the standards and recommendations applicable to natural gas measurement establish.

 

It is important to note that in all cases, the document that is the basis for measurement and invoicing is Resolution CREG 071 of 1999 Single Code on Natural Gas Transportation (“RUT”).

 

1. Definitions:

The general definitions in the area of metrology shall be those referred to in the Vocabulario Internacional de Metrología (VIM) International Vocabulary of Metrology, published by ICONTEC as Colombian Technical Standard NTC-2194 (most recent edition).

 

In the case of specific definitions applicable to metrology and measurement technology, the most recent edition of the glossaries of the respective standards and applicable recommendations shall be used as a reference.

 

2. Applicable Technical References

In the area of measurement, the most recent versions of the standards and recommendations published by the following institutions shall be used:

 

¨ ICONTEC
¨ ISO
¨ API
¨ AGA
¨ ASTM
¨ ISA
¨ ASME
¨ ANSI
¨ GPA
¨ NEMA
¨ IEC

 

3. Traceability of Measurements

 

All the measurements must be traceable to national and/or international standards.

 

This will be accomplished by the use of accredited laboratories in the country, recognized by the Superintendency of Industry and Commerce or the body that replaces it, for the performance of calibrations, analysis, and testing. Should the means or infrastructure not be available at the national level, international laboratories recognized by the equivalent body abroad shall be used.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 28 of 35

 

The master instruments used in the verification activities must have a margin of error at least two (2) times smaller than that of the instruments to be evaluated. In addition, they must be included in a measurement assurance plan to guarantee their reliability, bearing in mind the masters are used to determine the maximum calibration interval.

 

2. Energy Measurement

 

2.1 Entry Points

All the Entry Points must have an on-line gas chromatograph, as set forth in paragraph 5.2.1 of the RUT.

 

The chromatograph and the sampler must be selected, installed, and operated in a manner that guarantees the capture of representative samples and the performance of analysis with a low margin of error for measurements, pursuant to the applicable technical references in effect.

 

The on-line chromatograph must be integrated with the flow computer for the purposes of precise volume and energy measurement.

 

The chromatograph calibration gas must be a Certified Reference Material, and its analytical characteristics shall be better than the chromatograph’s technical specifications in order to allow its use as a master standard.

 

2.2 Exit Points

 

A monthly adjustment of the composition shall be performed at the exit points that operate with fixed chromatography. The composition shall be obtained from chromatographic sampling and analysis or via the monthly average taken from a nearby chromatograph that measures the same current with a negligible time difference regarding the period between adjustments.

 

The installation of on-line chromatographs at the exit points, where required, by mutual agreement of the parties, shall be the responsibility of the shipper and shall be subject to the criteria indicated above for the Entry Points.

 

3. Volumetric Measurement

 

For the measurement of gas volume, only those meters that are recognized for use in custody transfer operations and are supported by a standard and/or recognized technical recommendation shall be used.

 

The instruments for measurement of magnitudes other than volume (for example: pressure, temperature, density) but that influence the measurement result must be integrated with the flow computer.

 

Orifice plate measurement systems must comply with the most recent version of AGA Report No. 3 and have a plate-holder element that allows the performance of inspections and/or replacements without interruption of the flow. All plate measurement systems must have an inspection certificate issued by a recognized body that guarantees system compliance with the tolerances expressed in the standard.

 

Ultrasonic meters must have multiple trajectories and be calibrated in a recognized laboratory, under conditions similar to operating conditions. Sufficient space shall be provided for their installation, operation, and maintenance, and the tools necessary for on-the-spot removal of the transducers shall also be provided, in order to internally inspect, clean, and/or replace them in case of defect. Likewise, they must comply with the most recent version of AGA Report No. 9.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 29 of 35

 

Turbine-type meters must be calibrated in a recognized laboratory, under conditions similar to operating conditions. The meter must have an oil injector or pump that guarantees periodic lubrication of the bearings. Likewise, they must comply with the most recent version of AGA Report No. 7.

 

Mass meters must be calibrated in a recognized laboratory. When technically justifying the appropriateness of their use, it must be shown that the effect of the density variations on the volume calculation from the mass does not affect the measurement more than the ±1% margin of error indicated in the RUT. Otherwise, installation of equipment for ongoing determination of the specific gravity of the gas shall be required, integrated with the flow computer. Likewise, they must comply with the most recent version of AGA Report No. 11.

 

Rotameters may be calibrated to atmospheric pressure. A pressure gauge shall be installed on the rotameters for measurement of differential pressure, between the meter inlet and outlet. Likewise, they must comply with the most recent version of ANSI standard B109.3.

 

Diaphragm meters shall not be used as it is not possible to diagnose their performance throughout their useful life. The use of rotameters is recommended in their stead.

 

All of the measurement systems must have full bore and by-pass valves that facilitate operation and the execution of calibration, maintenance, and inspection activities. Likewise, the space and conditions around the system must be safe and of an appropriate size for access to the system and for the execution of future inspections and maintenance.

 

Measurement systems that may fail due to excessive acceleration in their components (for example: turbine, rotameter, diaphragm, mass, etc.) must have a restriction element for protection in case of over-revolution.

 

The method to guarantee transparency in measurements that have a by-pass without an alternate meter shall be decided by mutual agreement. The installation of seals, blind plates, or electronic locks integrated with the SCADA is recommended.

 

After a repair, the parties shall assess whether it is necessary for the meter to be recalibrated in a recognized laboratory. Should this be necessary, the system owner shall be responsible for the associated costs.

 

Should operating conditions change from the time when the measurement system was originally designed, causing its performance to not comply satisfactorily with the required measurement capacity and/or margin of error, the system shall be redesigned or replaced by one that satisfies the new operating condition. The system owner shall be responsible for the associated costs.

 

The flow computer must be approved pursuant to its compliance with the most recent edition of API MPMS standard 21.1 and be compatible with the Transporter’s SCADA System communication protocol. Therefore, the parties shall evaluate the communication protocol with the most appropriate flow computer, among which shall be considered Bristol Babcock’s BSAP.

 

4. Measurement of Other Variables

 

4.1 Temperature

 

Flow temperature must be determined according to the applicable technical references. The determination of error and the measurement margin of error associated with the flow temperature include the unit made up of the sensor and the transmitter or analog-digital converter, forming a single loop.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 30 of 35

 

4.2 Pressure

 

Static pressure must be determined according to the applicable technical references. Should absolute pressure transmitters not be used, it shall be determined from the average atmospheric pressure of the site where the measurement system will be installed, using the best and most up-to-date resources for its precise characterization (for example: in-situ monitoring, correlation by altitude, GPS, etc.).

 

4.3 Compressibility Factor

 

The gas compressibility factor shall be determined using the methods described in the most recent edition of AGA Report No. 8.

 

4.4 Speed of Sound in Natural Gas

 

For the purpose of ultrasonic meter diagnosis, the speed of sound in the natural gas shall be calculated using the methods described in the most recent edition of AGA Report No. 10.

 

4.5 Heating Value and Composition

At the points where there is on-line chromatography, the heating value shall be taken from the chromatograph and included in the flow computer calculations. The heating value shall be evaluated according to the most recent edition of ASTM standard D3588.

 

At those points with fixed chromatography, the parameters associated with gas composition and required for the calculation of its properties shall be adjusted monthly. These shall be obtained by chromatographic sampling and analysis or using the monthly average taken from a nearby chromatograph that measures the same current with a negligible time difference regarding the period between adjustments.

 

5. Margin of Error in Measurements

The measurement systems must operate within a combined margin of error of ±1%. To that end, the expanded margin of error, associated with the volume and energy measurements, and stated for a confidence level of 95% must be less than 1%.

 

The Guía para la expresión de la Incertidumbre en las Mediciones (GUM) Guide for the Statement of Margin of Error in Measurements, published by ICONTEC in the most recent edition of the Colombian Technical Guide GTC-51, shall be used to evaluate the interval that characterizes the dispersion of values that may reasonably be attributed to the measurement system as results.

 

6. Calibration of Measurement Equipment

 

6.1 First Calibration

The first calibration of the meter and of the instruments and equipment associated with the measurement system shall be performed in a recognized laboratory before their installation.

 

6.2 Verifications

Verification of metrological performance, accuracy, and the internal condition of the measurement systems shall be performed periodically, starting with the following intervals:

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 31 of 35

 

¨ Meters (primary element): annual inspection
¨ Other instruments and flow computer: monthly verification

 

After the first year, the initially-established verification periods may be extended up to a maximum of three (3) years for the meters and three (3) months for the other instruments and flow computer, provided the results of the inspection and historical data fully support the action.

 

Likewise, once extended, the periods may be shortened if for any reason the performance of the elements degrades in such a way that the extended interval would not allow appropriate metrological monitoring of the system.

 

Should there be instruments, equipment, and/or components that do not maintain their stability between successive one (1)-month periods, the owner shall proceed to repair or replace the element with one of better quality and stability.

 

7. Conservation of Readings

 

The TRANSPORTER and the SHIPPER shall keep original documents or supporting documentation regarding all testing or graphic data, or any other similar type of record, on optical and/or magnetic media for a period of four (4) years or the shortest period permitted by the applicable rules of the Energy and Gas Regulatory Committee (CREG), counted from the date on which the evaluation is performed.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 32 of 35

  

EXHIBIT III

 

GUARANTEE AMOUNT

 

Guarantee Amount= (Fixed Charge/365*RMR+Variable Charge*RMR+AOM/365) * 70 days * Q +
  (Fixed Charge/365*RMR+AOM/365) * 15 days * Q, where

 

Guarantee Amount: Guarantee Amount in Pesos ($)

 

Fixed Charge: Fixed Charge in USD/kcf/d-year, takes effect when the guarantee is established

 

Variable Charge: Variable Charge in USD/kcf, takes effect when the guarantee is established

 

AOM: Fixed Charge for Administration, Operation, and Maintenance in Pesos ($)/kcf/d-year, takes effect when the guarantee is established

 

RMR: Representative Market Rate for the day on which the guarantee is established, expressed in Pesos ($)/USD.

 

Q: Contracted capacity, in kcf/d.

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 33 of 35

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT

 

SECTION I – ESTF 1
   
Natural Gas Transportation Contract 1
   
CHAPTER I 3
   
GENERAL CONDITIONS 3
   
1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARTIES 3
   
2. RECITALS 3
   
3. DEFINITIONS 5
   
4. GUIDING PRINCIPLES 8
   
CHAPTER II 8
   
PARTICULAR CONDITIONS 8
   
1. PURPOSE 8
   
2. SCOPE 9
   
3. APPLICABILITY 9
   
4. SERVICE COMMENCEMENT DATE 9
   
5. ENTRY AND EXIT POINTS 9
   
6. TRANSPORTATION CHARGES 9
   
7. TERM OF THE CONTRACT 9
   
8. NOTICE 9
   
9. PERFECTION OF THE CONTRACT 10
   
10. TAXES 10

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 34 of 35

  

11. GUARANTEE 10
   
12. APPLICABLE LAW 10
   
13. CHANGES TO REGULATIONS 10
   
15. DELEGATION 11
   
16. OWNERSHIP OF THE GAS 11
   
17. INDEMNITY 11
   
18. CUSTODY OF THE GAS 11
   
19. CHANGES OF HUBS AND ENTRY OR EXIT POINTS 11
   
20. ASSIGNMENT OF THE CONTRACT 12
   
21. FORCE MAJEURE OR ACT OF GOD OR EXCUSABLE EVENT 12
   
22. DIRECT SETTLEMENT 13
   
23. EARLY TERMINATION OF THE CONTRACT 13
   
24. FULL SETTLEMENT OF THE CONTRACT 14
   
CHAPTER III 14
   
OPERATING CONDITIONS 14
   
1. GAS QUALITY 14
   
2. GAS METERING 15
   
3. TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS 17
   
4. NOMINATIONS AND CONFIRMED AMOUNT OF ENERGY 17
   
5. CALCULATION FOR VARIATIONS 18
   
6. COMPENSATION FOR VARIATIONS 18
   
7. BALANCE ACCOUNT 19
   
8. COMPENSATION FOR IMBALANCES 19
   
9. PRESSURE AT THE ENTRY AND EXIT POINTS 19

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

Commercial Department  
Firm natural gas Transportation Contract with ECOPETROL S.A. Page 35 of 35

 

10. NON-COMPLIANCE DUE TO LOW PRESSURE OR POOR GAS QUALITY AT THE EXIT POINT 19
   
11. SUSPENSION 20
   
CHAPTER IV 21
   
FINANCIAL CONDITIONS 21
   
1. APPLICABILITY OF THE SERVICE 21
   
2. CHARGES 21
   
3. INVOICING 22
   
4. PAYMENTS 23
   
5. DEFAULT 24
   
6. ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE CONTRACT 24
   
7. DISCOUNTS ON THE FIXED CHARGE 24
   
8. SIGNATURES 25
   
EXHIBIT I 26
   
SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING NATURAL GAS 26
   
EXHIBIT II 27
   
MEASUREMENT 27
   
EXHIBIT III 32
   
GUARANTEE AMOUNT 32

 

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51
PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25
BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.
www.tgi.com.co

 

Exhibit 4.4

TGI

TRANSPORTADORA DE GAS

DEL INTERIOR S.A. E.S.P.

BOGOTA ENERGY GROUP

Tax ID No. 900.134.459-7

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT No. 01 TO CONTRACT ESTF-029-2008

 

CONTRACT INFORMATION

 

Purpose of the Supplementary Agreement : Contracting of new transportation capacity subject to expansion of the Ballena-Barrancabermeja gas pipeline.
     
Estimated Value of the Supplementary Agreement : USD 30,054,886 plus $53,553,541,610.
     
Term of the Supplementary Agreement : December 31, 2020.
     
TRANSPORTER’S INFORMATION    
     
Company Name : TRANSPORTADORA DE GAS DEL INTERIOR S.A. E.S.P. – TGI S.A. E.S.P.
     
Tax Identification No. : 900.134.459-7
     
Legal Representative : JORGE ARMANDO PINEDA SÁNCHEZ
     
Identification : 91.241.552 from Bucaramanga
     
Address : Carrera 34 No. 41-51
     
City : Bucaramanga
     
Telephone : 632-0002
     
Fax : 632-5525
     
SHIPPER’S INFORMATION:    
     
Company Name : ECOPETROL S.A.
     
Tax Identification No. : 899.999.068-1
     
Authorized Representative : CAMILO MARULANDA LÓPEZ
     
Identification : 10.008.868 from Pereira
     
Address: : Carrera 13 A No. 87-10
     
City: : Bogota, Capital District
     
Telephone: : (57) (1) 234-4437
     
    [initials]

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT NO. 01 to ESTF-029-2008

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51

PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25

BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.

www.tgi.com.co

 

[ISO Certification in English], Accredited

 

Page 1 of 3
 

 

TGI

TRANSPORTADORA DE GAS

DEL INTERIOR S.A. E.S.P.

BOGOTA ENERGY GROUP

Tax ID No. 900.134.459-7

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT No. 01 TO NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT

 ESTF-029-2008

 

The undersigned parties, namely: JORGE ARMANDO PINEDA SÁNCHEZ , who is of legal age, identified as appears below his signature, acting as First Alternate to the President on behalf and as legal representative of TRANSPORTADORA DE GAS DEL INTERIOR S.A. E.S.P. – TGI S.A. E.S.P. , a Corporate Provider of Public Services created on February 16, 2007 by means of Notarial Instrument No. 067 executed at the office of Notary eleven (11) of the Bucaramanga circuit, with business registration number 05-138524-04, hereinafter referred to as the TRANSPORTER ; and CAMILO MARULANDA LOPEZ , of legal age, identified as appears below his signature, in his capacity as Vice President of Supply and Marketing, exercising the authority contained in the Delegation Manual, acting in name and on behalf of ECOPETROL S.A. , a federal decentralized agency created by Law 165 of 1948, with Tax Identification No. 899-999-068-1, organized as a Joint Venture Entity in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of Law 1118 of 2006, under the Ministry of Energy and Mines, with its primary domicile in Bogota, Capital District, whose Bylaws are contained in their entirety in Notarial Instrument No. 5314 of December 14, 2007 and the successive amendments thereof, all executed in the Second Notary's Office of the Notarial District of Bogota, Capital District, duly registered in the Chamber of Commerce of Bogota, Capital District, hereinafter referred to as the SHIPPER ; have agreed to execute this supplementary agreement, in accordance with the following:

 

WHEREAS:

 

1. On October 1, 2008, Ecopetrol S.A. and TGI S.A. E.S.P. executed Natural Gas Firm Transportation Contract No. ESTF-029-2008, hereinafter the Contract, in force from December 1, 2012 through December 31, 2020.

 

2. The subject matter of the Contract established that the transportation capacity contracted by the SHIPPER on the Ballena-Barrancabermeja route would be available as of the Service Commencement Date established in numeral 5.2 of Section I ESTF of the Contract, once the TRANSPORTER placed the facilities in operation that will permit the increase in the capacity of the Ballena-Barrancabermeja gas pipeline, which it agreed to do by no later than June first (1st), 2010.

 

3. This expansion will take the rated capacity of the Ballena-Barrancabermeja gas pipeline to 260 MCFD, which was made viable with the execution of the firm transportation contracts subject to this expansion on October 1, 2008.

 

4. Once the contracts mentioned in the preceding clause were executed, transportation capacity was made available via the Ballena-Barrancabermeja gas pipeline, which was offered by the TRANSPORTER to the SHIPPER and to the other shippers who signed contracts on the specified date, under the same conditions as the contracts signed at that time.

 

5. The TRANSPORTER offered the SHIPPER the additional quantities shown below for the period from December 2012 to December 2020.

 

Period   Additional kcfd  
From December 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012     28,714  
From January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2020     16,500  

 

6. The SHIPPER accepted the capacity offered by the TRANSPORTER.

 

7. The TRANSPORTER’S Commercial Committee No. 13 of 2008 recommended the execution of this Supplementary Agreement.

 

8. In the Bulletin of Fiscal Debtors prepared and published by the General Government Accounting Office of the Republic, the SHIPPER verified that the TRANSPORTER is not listed as one of the persons against whom a final tax liability decision has been issued and who has not paid the obligation contained therein.

 

[initials]

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT NO. 01 to ESTF-029-2008

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51

PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25

BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.

www.tgi.com.co

 

[ISO Certification in English], Accredited

 

Page 2 of 3
 

 

TGI

TRANSPORTADORA DE GAS

DEL INTERIOR S.A. E.S.P.

BOGOTA ENERGY GROUP

Tax ID No. 900.134.459-7

 

9. The TRANSPORTER evidences, via a certification issued by its internal auditor within the month prior to the date of signing of this supplementary agreement, that it has satisfied its obligations vis-à-vis health systems, occupational hazards, pensions and contributions to the Family Subsidy Funds, Colombian Institute of Family Welfare and National Apprenticeship Service, with respect to all its employees.

 

10. Prior to the signing of this supplementary agreement, the SHIPPER’s Gas Department implemented Asset Laundering Prevention Control Mechanisms and developed the Instruments for Proper Application thereof, in compliance with its General Policy for the Prevention and Control of Asset Laundering from May 2007.

 

11. Neither the SHIPPER nor the TRANSPORTER is affected by the disqualifications or incompatibilities provided for in the Law for entering into this supplementary agreement.

 

12. Both the TRANSPORTER’s and the SHIPPER’s representatives have the necessary authorization to sign this supplementary agreement.

 

In keeping with the foregoing, the Parties have agreed to amend the Contract in the following manner:

 

CLAUSE ONE : Amend numeral 6.1 “Firm Capacity Contracted (kcf/d)” of Section I-ESTF of the Contract, so that henceforth it will read as follows:

 

6.1. Firm Capacity Contracted (kcf/d)

 

From December 1, 2012 to December 31, 2020 Point 1: 101,500
Point 2: 15,000
Total: 116,500

 

Paragraph: As soon as it has more information about the distribution of the quantities required at each exit point, the SHIPPER will report this in a timely manner by sending a letter to the TRANSPORTER, which will be made official by means of a supplementary agreement to the contract.

 

CLAUSE TWO : Amend numeral 7.6 “Estimated Value of the Contract” of Section I-ESTF of the Contract, so that it will henceforth read as follows:

 

7.6 Estimated Value of the Contract   USD     $  
From December 1, 2012 to December 31, 2020     210,568,296       375,202,814,819  

 

CLAUSE THREE : All other stipulations of the Contract remain in force and unchanged.

 

This document is signed for the record on the fifth (5 th ) day of the month of December of the year two thousand eight (2008).

 

TRANSPORTADORA DE GAS DEL INTERIOR   ECOPETROL S.A.
S.A. E.S.P.    
     
[signature]   [signature]
     
JORGE ARMANDO PINEDA SÁNCHEZ   CAMILO MARULANDA LÓPEZ
National Identity Card No. 91.241.552   National Identity Card No. 10.008.868
from Bucaramanga   from Pereira
[handwritten initials]   [handwritten initials]

 

Prepared by: María C. Gómez [initials]
Reviewed by: Sonia R. Sanabria M. [initials]
  Elaine Soto B.
Approved by: Jorge A. Pineda S.

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT NO. 01 to ESTF-029-2008

CARRERA 34 No. 41 – 51

PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25

BUCARAMANGA – COLOMBIA S.A.

www.tgi.com.co

 

[ISO Certification in English], Accredited

 

Page 3 of 3

 

 

Exhibit 4.5

TGI

BOGOTÁ ENERGY GROUP

Tax ID No. 900.134.459-7

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT No. 02 TO CONTRACT ESTF-029-2008

 

CONTRACT INFORMATION

 

Purpose of the Supplementary Agreement : To add an Entry Point and an Exit Point and amend the contracted capacity.
Estimated Value of the Supplementary    
     
Agreement : $4,673,691,634.
     
Term of the Contract : December 31, 2020.
     
TRANSPORTER’S INFORMATION    
     
Company Name : TRANSPORTADORA DE GAS INTERNACIONAL S.A. E.S.P. – TGI S.A. E.S.P.
     
Tax Identification No. : 900.134.459-7
     
Legal Representative : RICARDO ROA BARRAGÁN
     
Identification : 19.451.246 from Bogotá
     
Address : Carrera 34 No. 41-51
     
City : Bucaramanga
     
Telephone : 632-0002
     
Fax : 632-5525

 

SHIPPER’S INFORMATION:

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT NO. 02 to ESTF-029-2008

 

[handwritten:] [initials]

 

  CARRERA 34 NO. 41 – 51  
  PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25 [ISO Certification in English]
  BUCARAMANGA, COLOMBIA, S.A.  
  WWW.TGI.COM.CO  

 

Page 1 of 7
 

 

TGI

BOGOTÁ ENERGY GROUP

Tax ID No. 900.134.459-7

 

Company Name : ECOPETROL S.A.
     
Tax Identification No. : 899.999.068-1
     
Authorized Representative : CLAUDIA L. CASTELLANOS R.
     
Identification : 63.314.635 from Bucaramanga
     
Address: : Calle 37 No. 8-43, 3 rd floor, Bogotá
     
City: : Bogotá, Capital District
     
Telephone: : 2344438

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT No. 02 TO NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT ESTF-029-2008

 

The undersigned parties, namely: RICARDO ROA BARRAGÁN , who is of legal age, identified as appears below his signature, acting as President in name and legal representation of TRANSPORTADORA DE GAS INTERNACIONAL S.A. E.S.P. – TGI S.A. E.S.P. , (formerly Transportadora de Gas del Interior S.A. ESP), Sociedad Anónima y Empresa Prestadora de Servicios Públicos, created via Notarial Instrument No. 67 dated February 16, 2007, executed at the Office of Notary 11 of the Notarial District of Bucaramanga-Santander, registered in the Chamber of Commerce of the same city on February 19, 2007 under No. 69863, with trade registration number 05-000138524-04 and Tax Identification No. 900.134.459-7 and primary domicile in the city of Bucaramanga, hereinafter referred to as the TRANSPORTER ; and CLAUDIA L. CASTELLANOS , who is of legal age, identified as appears below her signature, in her capacity as Vice President of Supply and Marketing, exercising the authorization contained in the Delegation Manual, acting in name and on behalf of ECOPETROL S.A. , a federal decentralized agency created by Statute 165 of 1948, with Tax Identification No. 899.999.068-1, organized as a Joint Venture Entity in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of Statute 1118 of 2006, under the Ministry of Energy and Mines, with its primary domicile in Bogotá, Capital District, whose Bylaws are contained in their entirety in Notarial Instrument No. 5314 of December 14, 2007 and the successive amendments thereto, all executed in the Office of Notary Two of the Notarial District of Bogotá, Capital District, and registered in the Chamber of Commerce of Bogotá, Capital District, hereinafter referred to as the SHIPPER ; have agreed to execute this supplementary agreement, in accordance with the following:

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT NO. 02 to ESTF-029-2008

 

[handwritten:] [initials]

 

  CARRERA 34 NO. 41 – 51  
  PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25 [ISO Certification in English]
  BUCARAMANGA, COLOMBIA, S.A.  
  WWW.TGI.COM.CO  

 

Page 2 of 7
 

 

TGI

BOGOTÁ ENERGY GROUP

Tax ID No. 900.134.459-7

  

WHEREAS:

 

1. On October 1, 2008, Ecopetrol S.A. and TGI S.A. E.S.P. executed Natural Gas Firm Transportation Contract No. ESTF-029-2008, hereinafter the Contract, in force from December 1, 2012 through December 31, 2020.

 

2. On December 5, 2008, Ecopetrol and TGI S.A. E.S.P. signed Supplementary Agreement No. 1 to the Contract, amending the firm capacity contracted and the estimated value of the Contract, expanding the capacity initially contracted by the Parties.

 

3. In a letter dated January 13, 2012, the SHIPPER requested to be informed of the maximum natural gas firm transportation capacity and the respective assignment it would have in the Cusiana Porvenir – Exit Point 1 (CIB) route from the Contract, from December 1, 2012 through December 2014.

 

4. For the gas from Cusiana/Cupiagua to be able to physically arrive at the Barrancabermeja Refinery and, therefore, for the capacity to be contracted from Cusiana Porvenir to be Firm, some changes must be made to the TRANSPORTER’S Transportation System. For this purpose, the Parties signed Supplementary Agreement No. 5 to Contract ESTF-004-2006, in which they included the terms under which these changes would be made once the Certificate to which Clause Five of the Supplementary Agreement in question makes reference was signed.

 

5. The TRANSPORTER has stated that it is expanding the Cusiana-El Porvenir-La Belleza-Vasconia transportation system (hereinafter "Phase II").

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT NO. 02 to ESTF-029-2008

 

[handwritten:] [initials]

 

  CARRERA 34 NO. 41 – 51  
  PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25 [ISO Certification in English]
  BUCARAMANGA, COLOMBIA, S.A.  
  WWW.TGI.COM.CO  

 

Page 3 of 7
 

 

TGI

BOGOTÁ ENERGY GROUP

Tax ID No. 900.134.459-7

 

6. The SHIPPER requested that, while the changes are being made to facilitate physically receiving gas from Cusiana/Cupiagua at the Barrancabermeja Refinery and until these are operational, the firm capacity assigned on the Cusiana Porvenir – Exit Point 1 (CIB) route be contracted for the Cusiana – Barranca E route, starting December 1, 2012.

 

7. The TRANSPORTER’S Commercial Committee No. 04 of 2012 recommended the execution of this Supplementary Agreement.

 

8. In the Fiscal Debtor Bulletin prepared and published by the General Government Accounting Office of the Republic, the SHIPPER verified that the TRANSPORTER is not listed in this bulletin as one of the persons against whom a final tax liability decision has been issued and who has not paid the obligation contained therein.

 

9. The TRANSPORTER evidences, via a certification issued by its internal auditor within the month prior to the date of signing of this supplementary agreement, that it has satisfied its obligations vis-à-vis health systems, occupational hazards, pensions and contributions to the Family Compensation Funds, Colombian Institute of Family Welfare and National Apprenticeship Service, with respect to all its employees.

 

10. Prior to the signing of this supplementary agreement, the SHIPPER’S Gas Department implemented Asset Laundering Prevention Control Mechanisms and developed the Instruments for Proper Application thereof, in compliance with its General Policy for the Prevention and Control of Asset Laundering from May 2007.

 

11. Neither the SHIPPER nor the TRANSPORTER is affected by the disqualifications or incompatibilities provided for in the Law for entering into this supplementary agreement.

 

12. Both the TRANSPORTER’S and the SHIPPER’S representatives have the necessary authorization to sign this supplementary agreement.

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT NO. 02 to ESTF-029-2008

 

[handwritten:] [initials]

 

  CARRERA 34 NO. 41 – 51  
  PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25 [ISO Certification in English]
  BUCARAMANGA, COLOMBIA, S.A.  
  WWW.TGI.COM.CO  

 

Page 4 of 7
 

 

TGI

BOGOTÁ ENERGY GROUP

Tax ID No. 900.134.459-7

 

In keeping with the foregoing, the Parties have agreed to amend the Contract in the following manner:

 

CLAUSE ONE : Amend numerals 4.1 “Entry Hub,” 4.2 “Exit Hub,” 4.3 “Entry Point” and 4.4. “Exit Point” of Section I-ESTF of the Contract, starting on December 1, 2012, provided that Phase II of the capacity expansion from Cusiana has become operational, as follows:

 

4.1 Entry Hub   4.2 Exit Hub

 

Ballena and Cusiana Porvenir

 

1. CIB.

2. Gas turbine

3. Barranca E.

 

4.3 Entry Point   4.4 Exit Point

 

Ballena : Outlet flange of the meter located at the Ballena Station at Centragas.

 

Cusiana Porvenir : Physical interconnection point between the facilities of the partners to the Santiago de las Atalayas contract in Cusiana and the Cusiana el Porvenir Gas Pipeline.

 

1.  CIB : The outlet flange of the meters located on the 16” line at COGB.

2.  Gas turbine : Hot tap installed on the 20” Gas line between Centragas and COGB located on Petrosantander property, which carries Gas to the gas turbine of the Barrancabermeja Refinery Facility (GRB) owned by the Shipper.

3.  Barranca E : Outlet flange of the Centragas meters in Barrancabermeja.

 

CLAUSE TWO : Amend numeral 6.1 “Firm Capacity Contracted (kcf/d)” of Section I-ESTF of the Contract, provided that Phase II of the capacity expansion from Cusiana has become operational, as follows:

 

6.1. Firm Capacity Contracted (kcf/d)

 

Route   December 2012     January to
December 2013
    January to August
2014
    September 2014
to December 2020
 
Ballena – Exit Point 1 (CIB)     79,394       79,394       80,867       101,500  
Ballena – Exit Point 2 (GAS TURBINE)     15,000       15,000       15,000       15,000  
Cusiana Porvenir – Exit Point 1 (CIB)*     24,762       25,613       25,613       -  

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT NO. 02 to ESTF-029-2008

 

[handwritten:] [initials]

 

  CARRERA 34 NO. 41 – 51  
  PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25 [ISO Certification in English
  BUCARAMANGA, COLOMBIA, S.A.  
  WWW.TGI.COM.CO  

 

Page 5 of 7
 

 

TGI

BOGOTÁ ENERGY GROUP

Tax ID No. 900.134.459-7

 

* Until such time as the modifications that will make it possible to receive gas from Cusiana/Cupiagua at Exit Point 1 (CIB) of the Contract are operational, the firm capacity contracted on the Cusiana Porvenir – Exit Point 1 (CIB) route will be assigned to the Cusiana Porvenir – Exit Point 3 (Barranca E) route. This capacity will be firm, using the Structure of Charges contained in the table for the Cusiana Porvenir – Exit Point 3 (Barranca E) route, established in number 7 of Section I-ESTF.

 

In addition, when it is technically and operationally feasible, the TRANSPORTER will allow for the possibility of diverting the firm capacity contracted from Cusiana-Porvenir, from Exit Point 3 (Barranca E) to Exit Point 1 (CIB).

 

CLAUSE THREE: Amend numerals 7.2 “Fixed Charge (USD/KCFD/Year),” 7.3 Variable Charge (USD/KCF),” 7.4 Fixed Charge for Administration, Operation and Maintenance ($/KCFD/Year)” and 7.6 “Estimated Value of the Contract” from Section I-ESTF of the Contract, provided that Phase II of the capacity expansion from Cusiana has become operational, as follows:

 

Route   7.2 Fixed Charge
(USD/KCFD-Year)
    7.3 Variable Charge
(USD/KCF)
    7.4 Fixed Charge for
Administration,
Operation and
Maintenance ($/KCFD-
Year)
 
Ballena – Exit Point 1 (CIB)     239,771       0       468,179  
Ballena – Exit Point 2 (GAS TURBINE)     239,771       0       468,179  
Cusiana Porvenir – Exit Point 1 (CIB)     300,255       0       324,745  
Cusiana Porvenir – Exit Point 3 (Barranca E)     300,255       0       324,745  

*Charges from December 2011 applicable to 2012

 

7.6 Estimated Value of the Contract

 

USD   $
230,236,653   437,853,718,767

 

CLAUSE FOUR : Amend point 2.3 of numeral 2 “Charges” of Chapter IV of the Contract, provided that Phase II of the capacity expansion from Cusiana has become operational, as follows:

 

2.3 In the event that the TRANSPORTER authorizes average daily transportation for one Gas Day greater than the Firm Capacity Contracted as established in

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT NO. 02 to ESTF-029-2008

 

[handwritten:] [initials]

 

  CARRERA 34 NO. 41 – 51  
  PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25 [ISO Certification in English]
  BUCARAMANGA, COLOMBIA, S.A.  
  WWW.TGI.COM.CO  

 

Page 6 of 7
 

 

TGI

BOGOTÁ ENERGY GROUP

Tax ID No. 900.134.459-7

 

Paragraph number 1 of this Chapter, the transportation of this higher daily volume will incur an additional fee in dollars and an additional fee in pesos corresponding to the maximum tariff of the “0% fixed, 100% variable” structure defined in Resolution CREG 125 of 2003, or in any resolution that amends, adds to or replaces it, as shown in the following table:

 

Route   USD/KCF     $/ KCF  
Ballena – Exit Point 1 (CIB)     0.850       1,283  
Ballena – Exit Point 2 (GAS TURBINE)     0.850       1,283  
Cusiana Porvenir – Exit Point 1 (CIB)     1.220       890  
Cusiana Porvenir – Exit Point 3 (Barranca E)*     1.220       890  

*Charges from December 2011 applicable to 2012

 

CLAUSE FIVE: All other stipulations of the Contract remain in force and unchanged.

 

Signed for the record on the eleventh (11 th ) of April of the year two thousand twelve (2012).

 

TRANSPORTADORA DE GAS INTERNACIONAL   ECOPETROL S.A.
S.A. E.S.P.    
     
[signature]   [signature]
     
RICARDO ROA BARRAGAN   CLAUDIA L. CASTELLANOS R.
National Identity Card No. 19.451.246   National Identity Card No. 63.314.635
from Bogotá   from Bucaramanga
[initials]   [three sets of initials]

 

Prepared by: María C. Gómez  
Reviewed by: Sonia R. Sanabria M. [four sets of initials]
  Laura M. Parra R.  
  Nubia Prada S.  
Approved by: Ricardo Roa B.  

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT NO. 02 to ESTF-029-2008

 

  CARRERA 34 NO. 41 – 51  
  PBX 57 (7) 632 00 02 FAX 57 (7) 632 55 25 [ISO Certification in English]
  BUCARAMANGA, COLOMBIA, S.A.  
  WWW.TGI.COM.CO  

 

Page 7 of 7

 

Exhibit 4.6

 

Master Crude Oil Service Contract  
General Conditions

 

MASTER CRUDE OIL SERVICE CONTRACT

 

This contract (hereinafter the “ Master Service Contract ”) for the transportation of Crude Oil, storage of Crude Oil, unloading of Crude Oil from tank trucks, loading services for Crude Oil at Ports and loading of Crude Oil into tank trucks for ECOPETROL Crude Oil (term defined in Clause 34 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract), is signed this first (1 st ) day of April, 2013 (hereinafter the “ Date of Signature ”), by and between,

 

1. ECOPETROL S.A. , a mixed economy company linked to the Ministry of Mines and Energy, with its principal domicile in Bogota, Capital District, with Tax Identification Number 899.999.068-1, represented for the purpose of entering into this Master Service Contract by Javier Genaro Gutierrez Pemberthy , identified by the title below his signature, acting in his capacity as President, with authority to sign this Master Service Contract as provided for under the Bylaws for ECOPETROL S.A. (hereinafter, “ ECOPETROL ”); and

 

2. CENIT TRANSPORTE Y LOGÍSTICA DE HIDROCARBUROS S.A.S. , a Colombian commercial corporation and type of simplified joint stock company, domiciled in Bogota, Capital District, organized by virtue of private document dated June fifteenth (15 th ), 2012, registered in the commercial registry on June fifteenth (15 th ), 2012, with commercial registration number 02224959, represented for the purpose of entering into this Master Service Contract by Camilo Marulanda López , identified by the title below his signature, authorized for such purposes by the Board of Directors as provided for under Meeting Minute No. eight (8) of February twenty-first (21 st ), 2013 (hereinafter “ CENIT ”).

 

Based on the foregoing conditions, ECOPETROL and CENIT (together the “ Parties ” and, individually, a “ Party ” or the “ Party ”), hereby affirm that they have entered into this Master Service Contract, taking into account the following

 

Recitals

 

1. ECOPETROL, pursuant to the provisions of Article 4 of the Petroleum Code, engages in activities related to the exploration, production, refining and transport of hydrocarbons, which are characterized as public utilities.

 

2. ECOPETROL, prior to the Date of Signature, had infrastructure, either owned or in concession, for the unloading, transport, storage and export of Crude Oil.

 

3. ECOPETROL, likewise (i) subject to available capacity for the assets referred to in the previous clause and (ii) pursuant to authorizations under the law or current concession contracts, had been prior to the Date of Signature providing unloading, transportation, storage and loading services for Crude Oil for export of hydrocarbons owned by third parties.

 

1
 

 

4. ECOPETROL individually constructed and operated prior to the Date of Signature pipelines for private use, which in accordance with the provisions of the Petroleum Code and Resolution 18 1258 of 2010 of the Ministry of Mines and Energy, and that it and its Affiliates (a term defined in Clause 34 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract) utilized pursuant to the provisions of Article 45 of the Petroleum Code.

 

5. ECOPETROL, individually, currently has in concession and/or under a licensing regime, private service port infrastructure, for exclusive use by it and its legal and financial entities, as provided for under law.

 

6. By virtue of the authorization contained in Decree 1320 of 2012, ECOPETROL formed the corporation CENIT as a subsidiary of ECOPETROL, specialized in providing transportation, storage and logistics services for hydrocarbons, derivatives, products and related materials in Colombia or abroad.

 

7. ECOPETROL (i) as part of the formation and effective start-up of CENIT and (ii) in its capacity as CENIT’s sole partner, carried out through an Asset Contribution Contract (a defined term in Section Clause 34 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract) (a) the contribution of assets associated with the transportation of Crude Oil owned by ECOPETROL (hereinafter the “ Assets ”) and (b) committed to undertake the processes aimed at the assignment of port concession contracts related to the import and export of Crude Oil and its products to CENIT, under the terms as determined and approved by the competent authority.

 

8. In accordance with the provisions of ECOPETROL’s Procurement Manual, entering into of this Master Service Contract is derived from a direct selection process based on the following specific and special conditions of CENIT: (i) to be the beneficiary of the transfer of the Assets, according to provisions in the foregoing recitals and (ii) be the only provider of the Services that are contemplated by this Master Service Contract, through Assets contributed by ECOPETROL.

 

9. This Master Service Contract shall establish the terms under which ECOPETROL will contract capacity for the Assets, taking into account ECOPETROL’s status as a petroleum exploration, production and refining company, pursuant to the provisions of Article 45 of the Petroleum Code.

 

10. The Parties, through agreements separate from this Master Service Contract, defined the terms and conditions under which ECOPETROL committed to assign to CENIT the rights and obligations in force as of the date of transfer of the Assets, particularly with relation to services provided to third parties, bilateral agreements, operating agreements and financial and social commitments associated with them.

 

11. CENIT is in compliance with its obligations concerning systems for health, professional risk, pension and contributions to Family Compensation Funds, the Colombian Institute of Family Welfare and the National Learning Service, with regard to all of its employees in Colombia. To confirm this, it provided ECOPETROL with a certificate attesting to the foregoing, issued by CENIT’s internal auditor.

 

2
 

 

12. CENIT is not listed in the Fiscal Debtor Bulletin prepared by the Colombian National Comptroller’s Office as an entity that has received a final tax liability decision and failed to comply with the obligation therein.

 

Based on the foregoing recitals, the Parties have agreed to enter into this Master Service Contract, which shall be subject to the following

 

General Conditions

 

Clause 1 Interpretation

 

Section 1.01    Interpretation. All capitalized terms in this Master Service Contract shall have the meaning indicated in Clause 34 of the General Conditions, or as expressly set forth herein. Definitions shall apply to the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, its Chapters and Chapter annexes, as well as to any supplementary agreement signed, except where otherwise provided. The meanings set forth for defined terms in this Master Service Contract shall be applicable both for singular and plural forms, and feminine, masculine or gender-neutral defined terms shall include all other genders.

 

Section 1.02   Interpretation Criteria. In the event there is a contradiction between the provisions contained in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, its Chapters and annexes hereof, in accordance with the Service in question, the order of prevalence regarding its interpretation shall be as follows:

 

(i) Chapters excluding their annexes.

 

(ii) Clauses of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, excluding their annexes.

 

(iii) Annexes.

 

Clause 2 Purpose

 

Section 2.01    The purpose of this Master Service Contract is to regulate the comprehensive provision of Services by CENIT to ECOPETROL, with respect to ECOPETROL Crude Oil. CENIT shall provide Services with full technical, financial and administrative autonomy in exchange for payment of Rates by ECOPETROL and in accordance with the Service provided.

 

Notwithstanding the provisions of this Master Service Contract, the scope, terms and specific conditions for the provision of each of the contracted Services are regulated in Chapters I, II, III, IV and V.

 

3
 

 

Section 2.02     In order to ensure the comprehensive provision of Services contemplated in this Master Service Contract for ECOPETROL, CENIT may utilize:

 

(i) The Assets listed in the descriptive annexes corresponding to each of the Chapters I, II, III, IV and V of this Master Service Contract, or

 

(ii) All additional or supplementary infrastructure that is developed and/or acquired and/or transferred and/or leased and/or that CENIT has available following the Date of Signature hereof, that is related to and/or incidental to the Assets referenced in (i) above and that is necessary or advisable to ensure the provision of the Services contemplated in this Master Service Contract. The Parties understand that the infrastructure referred to in this sub-paragraph shall not include the infrastructure referenced in Section 2.03 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Section 2.03     This Master Service Contract may include the provision of Services regarding:

 

(i) All infrastructure that following the conclusion of this Master Service Contract is acquired by and/or becomes available to CENIT, and that:

 

(a) Is not listed in the annexes for Chapters I, II, III, IV and V hereof, and,

 

(b) Is not necessary or advisable to ensure the provision of the Services contemplated in this Master Service Contract. With respect to such infrastructure, CENIT is required to offer access to such infrastructure to ECOPETROL, in identical conditions as would be offered to any other CENIT client, except in the case of business transactions tailored to meet the particular requirements of a third party.

 

(ii) All infrastructure that following the conclusion of this Master Service Contract is assigned to CENIT in its capacity as concessionaire and that:

 

(a) Is not included in the annexes for Chapters I, II, III, IV and V hereof, and,

 

(b) Is not necessary or advisable to ensure the provision of the Services contemplated in this Master Service Contract. With respect to this, CENIT is required to offer access to such infrastructure to ECOPETROL, in identical conditions as would be offered to any other CENIT client, except in the case of business transactions tailored to meet the particular requirements of a third party.

 

In each specific instance, CENIT and ECOPETROL shall define the terms under which the respective services shall be included in this Master Service Contract.

 

4
 

 

Clause 3 Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL

 

Section 3.01    For the comprehensive provision of Services, CENIT is required to guarantee for ECOPETROL the capacity necessary to transport ECOPETROL Crude Oil up to the Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL.

 

Section 3.02    Notwithstanding the special considerations provided for in Chapters I, II, III, IV and V of this Master Service Contract, the Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL shall include the following modalities: (i) Firm Capacity and (ii) Additional Capacity.

 

Section 3.03    Notwithstanding the provisions in Sections 3.04, 3.05 and 3.07, CENIT warrants to ECOPETROL that for the effective term of the Master Service Contract, it shall maintain availability of its Firm Capacity for each Asset at an amount that is no less than the figure resulting from the following formula:

 

Minimum Firm Capacity Availability = 0.9 x FC x (365 – S)

 

Where,

 

· FC is the Firm Capacity for each Asset; and
· S is the number of Days the applicable Service will be suspended due to a Justified Event.

 

Only during 2013, the Minimum Firm Capacity Availability for each Asset shall be calculated using the following formula:

 

Minimum Firm Capacity Availability = 0.9 x FC x (270 – S)

 

Section 3.04    Firm Capacity.

 

(i) Upon signature of this Master Service Contract, ECOPETROL shall have a Firm Capacity for each of the Assets, as specified in the annexes to Chapters I, II, III, IV and V hereof.

 

(ii) With respect to Firm Capacity:

 

(a) As specified in the annexes to Chapters I, II, III, IV and V hereof, ECOPETROL shall have a portion of such capacity under the “Ship or Pay” modality, pursuant to the definition contained in Clause 34 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

(b) As specified in the annexes to Chapters I, II, III, IV and V hereof, ECOPETROL shall have a portion of such capacity under the “Ship and Pay” modality, pursuant to the definition contained in Clause 34 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

(c) As a result of the provisions set forth in sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) above:

 

5
 

 

1. The sum total of contracted capacities under the “Ship or Pay” and “Ship and Pay” modalities amounts to one hundred percent (100%) of the Firm Capacity contracted by ECOPETROL.

 

2. Firm Capacity contracted under the “Ship or Pay” modality and Firm Capacity contracted under the “Ship and Pay” modality shall comprise percentages of the total Firm Capacity, based on the specifications in the annexes to the respective Chapters hereof. As of the Date of Signature, such percentages equal seventy-seven percent (77%) for the “Ship or Pay” modality and twenty-three percent (23%) for the “Ship and Pay” modality.

 

Section 3.05    Specific rights concerning Firm Capacity. ECOPETROL shall be entitled to release and/or assign in whole or in part Firm Capacity, based on the rules set forth below:

 

(i) Temporary Firm Capacity Release under “Ship or Pay” modality:

 

(a) ECOPETROL may at any point make the Firm Capacity under the “Ship or Pay” modality available to CENIT, either fully or in part, on a temporary basis.

 

It shall be understood that ECOPETROL releases such capacity in the following cases:

 

1. When ECOPETROL notifies CENIT by any means of the volumes it releases and the time for which the capacity release will be effective.

 

2. When ECOPETROL fails to nominate volumes within the Firm Capacity, in which case the release time shall be understood to be the respective Operational Month; and

 

3. When ECOPETROL fails to use all or part of its Scheduled Capacity, in which case the release time shall be understood to be the respective Day.

 

(b) For Temporary Capacity Release the Parties shall agree on the procedure for ensuring its commercialization.

 

If the Parties agree that CENIT is to market the Temporary Capacity Release, CENIT shall be required, on an ongoing basis, to offer and put forth its best efforts to market it. It is understood that CENIT shall offer the Temporary Capacity Release to third parties at such time as CENIT’s Available Asset Capacity is exhausted.

 

6
 

 

(c) ECOPETROL shall not be required to pay the Service Rate with regard to any Temporary Capacity Release that CENIT or ECOPETROL successfully markets to a third party.

 

(d) ECOPETROL shall pay a Service Rate on the Temporary Capacity Release when CENIT or ECOPETROL are unable to market such Temporary Capacity Release.

 

(e) With regard to ECOPETROL’s Temporary Capacity Releases which CENIT successfully markets, ECOPETROL shall remit to CENIT a Marketing Rate to be agreed by the Parties and shall not be required to pay any additional Rate. In any event, the amount of the Marketing Rate agreed by the Parties shall not be greater than:

 

1. For released and marketed capacities of up to twenty thousand (20,000 BPCD) Barrels per Calendar Day, the Marketing Rate shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the Service Rate corresponding to the Asset(s) subject to temporary release by ECOPETROL.

 

2. For released and marketed capacities in excess of twenty thousand (20,000 BPCD), the Marketing Rate shall not exceed seven percent (7%) of the Service Rate corresponding to the Asset(s) subject to temporary release by ECOPETROL.

 

(f) CENIT shall not be required to accept nominations from ECOPETROL with respect to the Temporary Capacity Release, except in the event that it has not successfully marketed such Temporary Capacity Release.

 

(g) In those cases where various users release capacity for the respective Asset and CENIT markets a portion of such Temporary Capacity Release, for purposes of applying the rules set forth in letters (c) and (e) above, CENIT shall distribute such marketed capacity among the users that have released capacity, based on the proportion of contracted firm capacity held by each one of the users that have released capacity.

 

(h) The release of capacity does not involve contractual modification of the Firm Capacity under ECOPETROL’s “Ship or Pay” modality.

 

(ii) Permanent Firm Capacity Release under the “Ship or Pay” modality:

 

(a) Within the first ten (10) Calendar Years of the Completion Period of the Master Service Contract, ECOPETROL may permanently make available to CENIT all or part of the contracted Firm Capacity.

 

(b) For purposes of the Permanent Capacity Release, ECOPETROL may at any time notify CENIT, and by any written means, of the volumes it is releasing of the respective Firm Capacity and the Asset to which such Permanent Capacity Release applies. The Permanent Capacity Release shall be effective as of the first (1 st ) Day of the third (3 rd ) month following the date of notification of such permanent release.

 

7
 

 

(c) Following the first ten (10) Calendar Years of the Completion Period of the Master Service Contract, ECOPETROL may permanently make available to CENIT, at any time, all or part of the Firm Capacity. In this case of capacity release, the Firm Capacity shall only be modified when expressly accepted by CENIT.

 

(d) ECOPETROL shall not be required to pay any Rate with regard to Permanent Capacity Release.

 

(e) The permanent capacity release leads to a contractual modification of ECOPETROL’s Firm Capacity. In order to determine the modified amount of Firm Capacity for each modality, the percentages set forth in Section 3.04 (ii) (c) (2) of the General Conditions shall be applied to the total amount of capacity that ECOPETROL has advised it will permanently release. 

 

(f) When ECOPETROL permanently releases capacity as a result of the termination or modification of the contract in force with the National Hydrocarbons Agency for the purchase of royalty Crude Oil, the Permanent Capacity Release shall modify the Firm Capacity:

 

1. When the release occurs during the first ten (10) Calendar Years of the Master Service Agreement, the percentages set forth in Section 3.04 (ii) (c) (2) the General Conditions shall be applied to the total amount of capacity that ECOPETROL has advised it will permanently release.

 

2. Following the tenth Calendar Year the Master Service Contract has been in force, ECOPETROL may only unilaterally release capacity for volumes corresponding to royalty hydrocarbons that, pursuant to an order from the National Hydrocarbons Agency (or the entity acting in its stead) or from ECOPETROL in its capacity as purchaser, shall no longer form part of the contract(s) for royalty purchases that ECOPETROL has in effect at any given time.

 

In this case, it shall be understood that Permanent Capacity Release corresponds solely to the Firm Capacity subject to the “Ship or Pay” modality. Consequently, the percentages set forth in Section 3.04 (ii) (c) (2) of the General Conditions shall be adjusted based on the total amount of the capacity that ECOPETROL has indicated it will permanently release. 

 

(iii) Assignment of rights to Firm Capacity:

 

(a) ECOPETROL may temporarily or permanently assign all or a portion of its contractual rights to the Firm Capacity agreed in this Master Service Contract.

 

8
 

 

(b) Should ECOPETROL exercise the option mentioned in the previous sub-paragraph, the following aspects must be taken into account:

 

1. ECOPETROL must inform CENIT of the volume of the capacity assigned to a third party, as well as of the effective time of the assignment for cases involving temporary assignment.

 

2. CENIT shall have a period of fifteen (15) Days to inform ECOPETROL of any objection it may have regarding any third party assignee. CENIT may not object to the assignment in cases where the third party assignee meets the following conditions:

 

(A) The assignee is a duly organized legal entity whose validity is at least equal to that of the assignment period, plus three (3) Calendar Years;

 

(B) The assignee has the financial capacity to satisfy the assigned obligations;

 

(C) The assignee grants to CENIT, if it so requests, an adequate guarantee to the satisfaction of the latter with respect to the obligations that are assumed; and

 

(D) The assignee is not authorized to in turn assign such rights to a third party, except where previously approved by CENIT.

 

3. The assignment of rights carried out by ECOPETROL and to which CENIT does not object, shall be fully binding and obligatory for CENIT.

 

4. The exercise of the rights to Firm Capacity by the assignee shall be subject to the execution of a separate contract between the third party and CENIT.

 

5. ECOPETROL shall not be jointly liable with the assignee regarding the obligations under its responsibility that are derived as a result of the assignment of Firm Capacity.

 

6. As a result of the Firm Capacity transfers, ECOPETROL shall not be required to pay any Rate for such assigned capacity.

 

Section 3.06    Additional Capacity.

 

(i) Should ECOPETROL so require, CENIT is required to offer Additional Capacity beyond the Firm Capacity in identical conditions as would be offered to a third party, subject to the existence of Unused Capacity.

 

9
 

 

(ii) Any Additional Capacity utilized by ECOPETROL shall be understood as having been agreed under the “Ship and Pay” modality, subject to the existence of Unused Capacity and shall be compensated by the payment of Service Rates applicable for the Services effectively provided to ECOPETROL.

 

Section 3.07    Addition to Firm Capacity. At any time, the Parties may agree that all or part of the Additional Capacity requested by ECOPETROL be added as Firm Capacity, for which the Parties shall enter into the respective agreement whereby the conditions for completing such additional shall be defined.

 

Section 3.08     In identical conditions as those offered to third parties, any increase in capacity in the Assets obtained by CENIT as of the Date of Signature of this Master Service Agreement, may be contracted by ECOPETROL under the Additional Capacity or Firm Capacity modality.

 

Any change to the Firm Capacity pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.08 shall require a previous written agreement by the Parties.

 

Section 3.09     The Parties understand ECOPETROL’s position vis-á-vis other Shippers or users of the Assets is diminished if: (i) it constitutes or grants new easements for the Assets to third parties; (ii) extends the term of existing easements with regard to the Assets and thereby affects the rights of ECOPETROL as derived from this Master Service Agreement; (iii) grants, allows or acknowledges for any user or Shipper privileges or priority regarding access to the infrastructure that diminish the status of Shipper held by ECOPETROL by virtue of this Master Service Contract, with the exception of the Preferential Right for royalty Crude Oil.

 

Clause 4 Terms

 

Section 4.01  Term of Validity. This Master Service Contract shall take effect on the Date of Signature and shall remain in effect until it is terminated. The foregoing is without prejudice to the provision contained in number (iv) of Section 31.01 of the General Conditions hereof.

 

Section 4.02   Completion Period. CENIT is required to unconditionally and irrevocably, and subject to the conditions hereof, provide ECOPETROL with the Services described in this Master Service Contract, as of the Commencement Date to the thirty-first (31st) of March, 2044.

 

For purposes of formalizing the commencement of each of the Services to be provided, the Parties shall sign a certificate of commencement specific to each one of these.

 

The Completion Period shall not be impacted when (a) CENIT’s permits, licenses or authorizations required in order to provide one or more of the contracted Services are not granted; (b) CENIT’s permits, licenses or authorizations required in order to provide one or more of the contracted Services are cancelled; (c) CENIT’s permits, licenses or authorizations required in order to provide one or more of the contracted Services cannot be extended. Should any of these situations arise, CENIT shall still be required to provide those Services that are not impacted by the failure to grant, cancellation, inability to extend or lack of permits, licenses or authorizations, notwithstanding any responsibility attributable to CENIT, when these cases, for reasons attributable to CENIT, impact the continuity of Services provided to ECOPETROL.

 

10
 

 

Section 4.03 Extension. The Completion Period shall be extended automatically in periods of five (5) Calendar Years. ECOPETROL must have funds available in the budget as a necessary condition for the automatic extension to take effect. ECOPETROL must notify CENIT, no less than six (months) in advance of the date of expiration of the Completion Period, of the Services that will be extended automatically, in accordance with existing availability of budgetary funds.

 

Clause 5 Value of the Contract and Consideration

 

Section 5.01   Value of the Contract. This Master Service Contract is for an undetermined amount. The final value of this Master Service Contract shall be established once it has been terminated and final settlement has occurred.

 

Section 5.02   Consideration. CENIT shall be compensated for the Services through payment of Service Rates pursuant to the terms and conditions established in the General Conditions and the Chapter regulating the respective Service.

 

ECOPETROL shall only be required to pay CENIT the Service Rate applicable to Services provided to ECOPETROL, and under the terms agreed in this Master Service Contract. Consequently, ECOPETROL shall not be required to make additional payments.

 

Section 5.03   Comprehensive nature of Service Rates. Service Rates shall include all costs, expenses, risks and utility associated with providing the Services contemplated under the Master Service Agreement.

 

Section 5.04     Notwithstanding CENIT’s contractual responsibility, ECOPETROL shall not be required to remit Service Rates for:

 

(i) The volumes of ECOPETROL Crude Oil corresponding to Identifiable Losses, except where CENIT demonstrates that they were attributable to a Justified Event and that all Reasonable Efforts were put forth; or

 

(ii) The volumes of ECOPETROL Crude Oil corresponding to Non-Identifiable Losses exceeding the maximum allowable tolerance under the law for these losses or the tolerance agreed by the Parties.

 

ECOPETROL shall remit the applicable Rate in those situations where CENIT provides the same volumes to ECOPETROL in kind, in the grades delivered by ECOPETROL, or its equivalent in offset volumes.

 

Section 5.05    Review of Service Rates. Service Rates may be reviewed:

 

(i) For Crude Oil Transportation Service:

 

11
 

 

(a) In each rate period or in the situations permitted under law, pursuant to the provisions of the Ministry of Mines and Energy Resolution 12 4386 of 2010, as amended or superseded;

 

(b) At any time when changes to the regulations for this activity occur; or

 

(c) When CENIT establishes more favorable conditions for Shippers than those set forth in this Master Service Contract for ECOPETROL, taking into consideration the applicable contracting schedules.

 

(ii) For other Services, every four (4) years from the Date of Signature, for which a new written agreement modifying current Rates will be necessary.

 

When either of the Parties requests that a Rate be revised, the other Party shall be required to provide the respective studies in advance, for which the Party requesting the revision shall submit or furnish all supporting documentation on which its request is based. The Party completing the study may refuse to modify the Rate only by reasonable written justification.

 

In the event of disagreement, the interested Party may pursue the mechanisms provided for under Clause 24 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, which shall not imply the suspension of the respective Services or the suspension of ECOPETROL’s obligation to continue remitting the respective Service Rate in force.

 

Section 5.06   Agreements concerning Benefits, Discounts and Monetary Conditions. At any time while this Master Service Contract is in force, the Parties may agree in writing on benefits, discounts or Monetary Conditions concerning contracted Services.

 

Section 5.07    Readjustment of Rates. Rates shall be readjusted as follows:

 

(i) Rates corresponding to Crude Oil Transportation Service shall be readjusted annually by applying the formula set forth in Article 13 of the Ministry of Mines and Energy Resolution 12 4386 of 2010, as amended, supplemented or superseded.

 

(ii) Rates for other Services shall be readjusted each Calendar Year by using:

 

(a) The consumer price index published by the National Administrative Department of Statistics, or the entity that may replace it, corresponding to the immediately preceding Calendar Year, for those Rates agreed in Colombian pesos;

 

(b) The Consumer Price Index of the United States of America, series CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) 1982-84=100 (Unadjusted) - CUUR0000SA0 corresponding to the immediately preceding Calendar Year, pursuant to the data reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics or the entity that may replace it, for Rates agreed in United States dollars.

 

12
 

 

Clause 6 Invoicing and Payment

 

Section 6.01   Invoicing. CENIT shall issue an original and copy of individual invoices for each Service, i.e. Crude Oil Transportation Service, Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service, Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports, Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service and marketing service for Temporary Capacity Release.

 

Crude Oil Transportation Service, Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service, Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports and Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service shall be invoiced monthly within the first twenty (20) Days of the Operational Month.  

The volumes that must be taken into account when invoicing for Crude Oil Transportation Service, Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service, Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports and Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service under the “Ship or Pay” modality shall be the volumes corresponding to the Firm Capacity in effect as of the invoice date.

 

The volumes that must be taken into account when invoicing for Crude Oil Transportation Service, Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service, Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports and Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service under the “Ship and Pay” modality and Additional Capacity, shall be the volumes corresponding to ECOPETROL’s Scheduled Capacity for the Operational Month.

 

Section 6.02     Notwithstanding the foregoing, CENIT must provide ECOPETROL with an annex providing for the breakdown of the invoice based on the following factors:

 

(i) Detail concerning the volume invoiced for each Pipeline, Unloading Platform, Port and Loading Platform.

 

(ii) Detail concerning the Crude Oil Transportation Rate, Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Rate, Crude Oil Loading at Ports Rate, Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Rate for the service invoiced for each Pipeline, Unloading Platform, Port and Loading Platform.

 

Section 6.03     In order to facilitate and expedite the verification of ECOPETROL’s invoices, CENIT shall send a PDF copy of the invoice and any corresponding debit or credit notes via e-mail the same day the invoice is prepared, to the e-mail account registered to ECOPETROL.

 

Section 6.04       Currency . Invoices shall be issued in United States dollars.

 

Section 6.05    Payment. ECOPETROL is required to remit irrevocable payment of the invoice within thirty (30) Days following its date of issuance, in Colombian pesos or United States dollars pursuant to the agreement of the Parties, to the bank account registered to ECOPETROL, in immediately available funds and in accordance with CENIT’s Asset Laundering Policy. In the event of a disagreement, the Parties accept that in all cases the payment shall be made in Colombian pesos.

 

ECOPETROL may remit payment for invoices in United States dollars, provided that the Colombian exchange legislation in force allows payment in dollars by national residents.

 

13
 

 

For purposes of payment for Services in pesos, the amount of the payment shall be determined by using the respective service Rate in dollars as a base and applying the official Representative Market Rate (TRM, for its initials in Spanish) certified by the Financial Superintendence applicable to the Date of payment.

 

Section 6.06    Invoicing Disputes.

 

(i) CENIT must provide ECOPETROL with invoices for each service provided, yet in no case shall its receipt imply acceptance of the respective invoice.

 

(ii) ECOPETROL shall have a period of ten (10) business days as of the date of issuance of the invoices for each service, to review or dispute them. Upon the expiry of this period, if ECOPETROL has not raised an objection, the invoice shall be understood to have been accepted in its entirety by ECOPETROL. Objections to the invoice shall not disrupt the payment period for those amounts that are not in dispute.

 

ECOPETROL shall provide notice to CENIT within the period provided concerning any disputed invoice so that it may be adjusted and corrected, clearly specifying the sections that should be adjusted and corrected and the respective reasons why.

 

CENIT must respond to the objection within ten (10) business days following its receipt, provided that ECOPETROL provides CENIT with all documentation giving rise to the dispute, except where the Parties determine via mutual agreement to extend this period as may be advisable given the complexity of the objection or any other reasonable circumstance.

 

In the event that CENIT fails to respond to the objection within the aforementioned period, the objection shall be deemed accepted by CENIT. If CENIT makes a determination about the objection that is favorable to ECOPETROL, it shall be understood that there is no payment obligation for the disputed invoice as originally submitted. In this case, the receipt date shall be the date of submission of the new invoice.

 

If CENIT decides the objection in its favor, ECOPETROL shall be required to pay any outstanding amount within ten (10) business days following CENIT’s notification of its decision regarding the objection. In order to resolve any disagreement, each Party shall provide the other Party with a copy of the documentation in support of the invoice and the objection. Should ECOPETROL disagree with CENIT’s determination, ECOPETROL may apply the provisions of Clause 23 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Agreement (Disputes and Direct Settlement), in which case ECOPETROL shall not be required to remit payment to CENIT of the amount in dispute.

 

Section 6.07    Payment Delinquency. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 19.03 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, in the case of unjustified failure to pay when due invoices are not challenged within a timely manner by ECOPETROL, in accordance with the provisions of this Clause, ECOPETROL shall pay CENIT (i) interest in pesos at the maximum penalty Rate authorized by the Financial Superintendence each day the balance due is unpaid, or (ii) interest due in dollars at the maximum annual penalty Rate of Libor (+4), which under no circumstances may be more than the usury Rate established by Colombian law or less than the consumer price index for the immediately preceding Calendar Year, for each day the balance due is unpaid.

 

14
 

 

Invoices for collection of interest shall be paid by ECOPETROL within thirty (30) Days following the date they are submitted by CENIT.

 

Invoices issued, as well as this Master Service Contract, are enforceable per se as a judgment debt, and ECOPETROL and CENIT expressly waive any formal private or legal declarations of default.

 

Section 6.08    Adjustments in Invoicing. Adjustment shall be made to invoiced amounts in the following cases:

 

(i) In the case of adjustment arising from information regarding Volumetric Compensation for Quality agreed to by the Parties.

 

(ii) In the case of adjustments against Barrels actually transported in the case of Ship and Pay and Additional Capacity contracts.

 

(iii) In cases of adjustments for Temporary Capacity Releases that arise and are used by another Shipper under the terms of Section 3.05 (i) Temporary Release of Firm Capacity under “Ship or Pay” modality and Section 3.05 (iii) Assignment of Firm Capacity rights of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

(iv) In the event of adjustments due to challenges to the invoices as set forth in this Clause.

 

(v) For Identifiable Losses and Non-Identifiable Losses attributable to CENIT, for each of the services provided and pertinent Assets.

 

(vi) Due to Suspension of services performed according to the provisions of Clause 19 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, for each of the services rendered and pertinent Assets.

 

(vii) Penalties to ECOPETROL for breach of CENIT’s Transportation Program according to the provisions of Clause 22 of CENIT’s Transporter Manual, for each of the services provided.

 

(viii) Any adjustment in keeping with the agreement between the Parties, arising from the rights and obligations of this Master Service Contract.

 

(ix) Any adjustment in keeping with the provisions of the annexes to this Master Service Contract.

 

(x) In any case, adjustments shall be made by issuing invoices or debit or credit notes subject to the same provisions regarding payment term, interest, and procedure for invoicing disputes stipulated in this Clause.

 

15
 

 

Section 6.09    If for any reason CENIT requests that: (i) payments be made to another natural person or legal entity, or (ii) that invoices be prepared by another natural person or legal entity, such operations of CENIT shall not be binding on ECOPETROL, unless: (a) ECOPETROL is notified regarding the operation intended by CENIT at least three (3) months prior to issuance of the invoice or payment; (b) the operation intended by CENIT does not affect rights in effect on the date of the operation or the future rights of ECOPETROL; and (c) in the event of acceptance by ECOPETROL, the assignee complies with all of the requirements established by ECOPETROL for procedures for invoicing and payments.

 

Section 6.10    ECOPETROL shall have a period of thirty (30) Days following the date of receipt of notification from CENIT to accept or decline. If ECOPETROL does not reply within the referenced period, it shall be understood that there is no objection to the intended operation notified by CENIT.

 

Section 6.11    If CENIT is interested in factoring the invoices that it issues to ECOPETROL with regard to this Master Service Contract, ECOPETROL shall first be given the option to pay the individual invoices for each of the following services in advance: Crude Oil Transportation Service, Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service, Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports, and the Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service in the term and under the discounts stipulated by the Parties.

 

Section 6.12     With respect to the Crude Oil Storage Service, the terms and conditions applicable to this Clause shall be stipulated by the Parties taking into account the provisions of Chapter II of this Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 7 Representations of the Parties

 

Section 7.01   Representations of ECOPETROL. ECOPETROL represents in favor of and to the benefit of CENIT that:

 

(i) It is a company whose corporate purpose is carrying out in Colombia or in foreign countries commercial or industrial activities pertaining to or related to the exploration, production, refining, transportation, storage, distribution and marketing of hydrocarbons, their products and any supplementary, connected or useful activity for the performance of the foregoing, organized in the Republic of Colombia pursuant to Colombian law.

 

(ii) It is fully qualified according to the laws of the Republic of Colombia to enter into this Master Service Contract and to comply with the obligations assumed under the same, and it is authorized to enter into it and comply with it in accordance with all corporate requirements and other pertinent acts.

 

16
 

 

(iii) Notwithstanding the special conditions arising from the provisions of Recital 10, the signature and performance of the Master Service Contract, and the Chapters and annexes thereto do not constitute a violation or breach of the terms or conditions of any contract or agreement to which it is a party, its bylaws or any law, regulation or court order.

 

(iv) ECOPETROL has the respective budgetary approval for the multi-annual payments budgeted for performance of the Master Service Contract hereunder.

 

Section 7.02   Representations of CENIT. CENIT represents in favor of and to the benefit of ECOPETROL that:

 

(i) It is a simplified joint stock company organized in the Republic of Colombia according to Colombian law, dedicated primarily to the transportation and storage of hydrocarbons, their products and related materials by means of transportation and/or storage systems, for which it may design, build, operate, manage, develop commercially and own hydrocarbon transportation systems and related installations, including without limitation loading platforms, unloading platforms and storage tanks, as well as providing services related to port operation.

 

(ii) It is fully qualified according to the laws of the Republic of Colombia, its company bylaws and other company or corporate provisions to enter into this Master Service Contract and to comply with the obligations assumed hereunder, and it is authorized to enter into it and comply with it in accordance with all corporate requirements and other pertinent acts.

 

(iii) It shall have all the licenses, authorizations and permits necessary for compliance with its obligations in order to provide the Services.

 

(iv) During the effective term of this Master Service Contract it shall have available and shall directly maintain or contract services for the operation and maintenance of infrastructure for transportation and logistics of hydrocarbons by an expert operator.

 

(v) The signature and performance of the Master Service Contract and the Chapters and annexes thereto do not constitute a violation or breach of the terms and conditions of any contract or agreement to which it is a party, its bylaws or any law, regulation or court order.

 

Clause 8 Obligations of the Parties

 

Section 8.01    Obligations of CENIT. The following are special obligations of CENIT, among others:

 

(i) To comply promptly with all the obligations pertaining to it pursuant to the Master Service Contract and current law as:

 

(a) Employer;

 

17
 

 

(b) A party to the contract;

 

(c) Agent in the hydrocarbons chain; and

 

(d) Provider of transportation, loading, unloading, storage and operation of Ports.

 

(ii) To schedule and provide the Services efficiently in accordance with the requirements of ECOPETROL, under the terms defined in this Master Service Contract.

 

(iii) To operate the infrastructure associated with the Services and to perform maintenance on it.

 

(iv) To exclusively assume all of the operating expenses and capital investments of the Assets. Without limitation, CENIT shall also assume on its own accord and at its own risk all costs and expenses associated with:

 

(a) Operation of the Assets.

 

(b) Maintenance of the Assets.

 

(c) Investments for integrity or increase of capacity or expansions regarding the Assets.

 

(d) Abandonment of the Assets.

 

(v) To be liable to ECOPETROL for any event or situation that constitutes a breach of its contractual obligations.

 

(vi) To be liable for:

 

(a) Any damage or loss that may be incurred by third parties during the performance of the activities or execution of the obligations established in this Master Service Contract.

 

(b) Any penalty and/or fine arising from failure to comply with the law or failure to comply with the permits, licenses and/or authorizations related to the performance of this Master Service Contract.

 

(vii) To abstain from carrying out or permitting practices or behavior that is not provided for in this Master Service Contract and in applicable law, which affects or jeopardizes the rights of ECOPETROL as user of the Services.

 

(viii) To carry out all the acts and procedures necessary to ensure proper performance of the purpose of this Master Service Contract.

 

(ix) To accept nominations made by ECOPETROL within Contracted Capacity related to the Services under this Master Service Contract, as well as to receive, store, handle, and deliver ECOPETROL Crude Oil, according to the scheduling.

 

18
 

 

(x) To process and/or apply for government permits and/or licenses that are necessary to perform the Services and the extensions thereof if necessary, and to comply fully with the aforementioned authorizations.

 

(xi) To assess, collect, and remit the transportation tax on Crude Oil belonging to ECOPETROL, as well as to send to the Ministry or Mines and Energy or any entity that acts in its stead information regarding volumes transported by the Pipeline under the Master Service Contract.

 

(xii) To notify ECOPETROL as soon as reasonably possible of any event that may occur or that may be reasonably foreseen, that affects or could affect the provision of the Services or the legal effect of this Master Service Contract.

 

(xiii) To expedite and maintain updated in keeping with national laws and Prudent Industry Practices all regulations, manuals and procedures applicable to the Services to be performed under this Master Service Contract.

 

(xiv) To ensure practices for attending to, controlling and mitigating risks associated with the Services and for managing contingencies aimed at preventing or mitigating the effects vis-à-vis the provision of the Services under this Master Service Contract.

 

(xv) To promptly provide any reports and/or information required by ECOPETROL in the performance of this Master Service Contract.

 

(xvi) To allow ECOPETROL, at its own cost and subject to prior request at least five (5) Days in advance, to carry out an inspection, audit and verification regarding information and documentation related to this Master Service Contract.

 

(xvii) To facilitate and assist in attending to requests of any type that may be made by oversight agencies that monitor the activity of ECOPETROL, related to the Services and the compliance of obligations under this Master Service Contract.

 

(xviii) To permanently assist with and perform all activities related to the Services under this Master Service Contract, in coordination with other Agents that provide to CENIT services of the same or a similar nature and that are necessary to attend to requests made by ECOPETROL.

 

(xix) To comply with and ensure that contractors related to the provision of the Services comply with current standards regarding Hygiene, Safety, and the Environment (hereinafter “ HSE” ).

 

(xx) To fully comply with legal provisions regarding prevention and monitoring of asset laundering and terrorism financing (hereinafter “ LA/FT ”) as applicable, efficiently and promptly implementing policies and procedures necessary for such purpose.

 

19
 

 

(xxi) To advance all necessary procedures to make needed changes to the Transporter Manual applicable on the Date of Signature of the transportation contracts signed by ECOPETROL with the partners of the Oil Pipeline of Bicentenario S.A., assigned to CENIT under the Asset Contribution Contract.

 

(xxii) To discharge all other obligations arising from the nature of the Master Service Contract.

 

Section 8.02    Obligations of ECOPETROL. The following are special obligations of ECOPETROL, among others:

 

(i) To comply in a timely manner with all the obligations pertaining to it according to the Master Service Contract and current law as:

 

(a) Employer;

 

(b) A Party to the contract; and

 

(c) Agent in the hydrocarbons chain.

 

(ii) To comply with procedures applicable to this Master Service Contract, particularly those associated with nominations, Hydrocarbons Quality and Line Filling.

 

(iii) To nominate and deliver the nominated and accepted quantities of ECOPETROL Crude Oil at the applicable Entry Points, as well as to receive the pertinent volumes at the Exit Points when applicable.

 

(iv) To make payment of the Rates and payment of the taxes for which it is responsible under the terms and conditions established in this Master Service Contract.

 

(v) To be liable for:

 

(a) Any damage or loss that may be incurred by third parties during the performance of the activities or execution of the obligations established in this Master Service Contract.

 

(b) Any penalty and/or fine arising from failure to comply with the law or failure to comply with the permits, licenses and/or authorizations related to the performance of this Master Service Contract.

 

(vi) To make its best efforts to coordinate with other Agents who provide the same or similar services to CENIT any activities that are necessary in order to avoid hindering performance of the obligations of CENIT arising from this Master Service Contract.

 

(vii) To notify CENIT as soon as reasonably possible of any event that arises or that could reasonably be foreseen that affects or could affect the provision of the Services or the legal effect of this Master Service Contract.

 

20
 

 

(viii) To carry out all the acts and procedures necessary to ensure proper performance of the purpose of this Master Service Contract.

 

(ix) To discharge all other obligations arising from the nature of the Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 9 Followup Committee

 

Notwithstanding the authority of ECOPETROL to supervise and audit compliance of the obligations of CENIT, the Parties agree to form a Followup Committee whose principal objective shall be to monitor performance of the Services, which shall be governed by the following rules:

 

Section 9.01   Formation. The Followup Committee shall consist of four (4) members and their alternates. Each Party shall appoint two (2) members with their respective alternates. Each Party may independently replace their members on the Followup Committee, and it shall be necessary to inform the other Party in writing of any change at least fifteen (15) Days prior to the date the appointed person fills the position.

 

Section 9.02 Duties. The Followup Committee shall have the following duties:

 

(i) To analyze situations that affect provision of the Services in order to recommend the actions to be taken.

 

(ii) To study any items of interest submitted by the Parties in order to improve provision of the Services according to the requirements of the Parties.

 

(iii) To present and track claims submitted by ECOPETROL due to or related to performance of the Master Service Contract.

 

(iv) To define, stipulate, discuss and request reports and clarifications that CENIT is required to provide to ECOPETROL pursuant to the obligations contained in number (xv) of Section 8.01 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract due to its performance.

 

The duties of the Followup Committee shall under no circumstances be deemed as an authority of ECOPETROL to co-manage provision of the Services or to affect the technical, administrative, financial and operating autonomy of CENIT.

 

Section 9.03   Meetings. The Followup Committee shall meet at least once a month within the first ten (10) Days of the respective month, notwithstanding the ability to meet at any other time when circumstances require, by communication sent by one of the representatives to the other.

 

Annual scheduling of meetings shall be carried out by CENIT and sent to ECOPETROL within the first fifteen (15) Days of December of each Calendar Year. For the first year of the Completion Period of the Master Service Contract, the schedule shall be sent on the last business day of April 2013 at the latest.

 

21
 

 

Clause 10 Exclusion of Employment Affiliation

 

(i) This Master Service Contract establishes a purely commercial affiliation between the Parties associated with the provision of the Services, and therefore this Master Service Contract does not entail any employment affiliation or subordination or intermediation between the Parties, or between any one of them and the personnel that, under the Master Service Contract, each Party appoints for its performance.

 

(ii) CENIT shall be and shall be considered an independent contractor and not the agent, representative, or mere intermediary of ECOPETROL. At no time shall CENIT be authorized to bind ECOPETROL or to act on its behalf, except with express authorization in writing from ECOPETROL. The performance of the Master Service Contract shall be under the exclusive supervision and control of CENIT.

 

(iii) Each Party and its subcontractors, and the workers of one and of others, shall not be subordinated in the work to the other Party, nor shall they be the other Party’s intermediaries, and shall have full technical, administrative and managerial autonomy with respect to their obligations under this Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 11 Claims

 

Notwithstanding (i) the procedure for claims established for invoices under Section 6.06 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract and (ii) the special procedure established for management of indemnities, any other claim that ECOPETROL may have arising from the performance of this Master Service Contract shall be submitted in writing within ninety (90) Days following occurrence of the event from which the claim arose, with any applicable supporting arguments.

 

All claims shall be processed according to the procedures defined by CENIT for addressing complaints and claims promptly and diligently, within a maximum period of sixty (60) Days to provide a substantive response to them.

 

This claims procedure does not in any way affect the rights of ECOPETROL to claim any type of damage, loss or indemnity in accordance with the procedures established in this Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 12 Environmental and occupational health liability

 

Section 12.01  CENIT :

 

(i) Acknowledges that it is the sole party responsible for any damage or deterioration, however slight, that CENIT or its workers or contractors cause related to provision of the Services regarding the air, water, ground, or to human health and animal or plant life, or for pollution or damage to highways, internal roads, streets, marshes, rivers, drainage ditches, parks, green areas, residential areas and equipment or plants, as a consequence of the performance of its activities, and consequently will hold ECOPETROL harmless under the terms of this Master Service Contract.

 

22
 

 

 

(ii) Declares that it is aware of Colombian law on the protection of human health, natural resources and the environment, and agrees to comply with it.

 

(iii) Acknowledges that it shall be the sole party responsible for compliance with laws on occupational health, safety of all personnel who work for CENIT or for its contractors related to performance of the Services and protection of assets.

 

(iv) Agrees to implement a special policy for protection of health and conservation of the environment, expressly making employees and contractors related to provision of the Services aware of it.

 

Under such policy, in actual practice CENIT shall give proper attention to the environment, workers’ health and health of other individuals at the locations where the Master Service Contract will be performed, preserving the air, water, soil and animal and plant life from any adverse effect that could arise from activities pertaining to the Master Service Contract and collaborating closely with ECOPETROL.

 

(v) Shall provide all protection systems necessary to ensure the safety of the people and assets of ECOPETROL, being directly responsible for any damage arising from the performance of the Master Service Contract.

 

Section 12.02   ECOPETROL may carry out periodic inspections at the installations of CENIT related to providing the Services in order to verify compliance with standards regarding protection of health, environment and assets as well as to detect any harmful or hazardous action, for which it shall have and has the respective authorization.

 

Any violation of standards regarding protection of health, environmental protection and handling of assets, as established in this Clause during the performance of this Master Service Contract shall be corrected by CENIT at its own cost and risk.

 

Clause 13 Corporate Responsibility

 

CENIT agrees to:

 

(i) Respect and observe the Code of Good Governance, the Policies of Comprehensive Responsibility and Corporate Responsibility of ECOPETROL and the policies on prevention, oversight, and management of the risk of asset laundering and the financing of terrorism of ECOPETROL. In the event of contradictory provisions between the policies of CENIT and those of ECOPETROL, the Parties agree in good faith to agree on a solution and a course of action to follow.

 

23
 

 

(ii) Endeavor to establish and maintain good relations with the institutions (authorities) and communities located in the regions and areas where the Master Service Contract will be performed.

 

(iii) Report to the contract manager of the Master Service Contract or to the person who carries out his/her duties, any incidents or events that could affect its image and/or that of ECOPETROL within three (3) business days following their occurrence in order to handle the matter jointly.

 

Clause 14 Transparency commitment

 

The Parties agree to:

 

(i) Uphold appropriate behaviors and oversight to ensure ethical conduct in accordance with current standards.

 

(ii) Refrain from making (directly or indirectly or through employees, representatives, affiliates or contractors), payments, loans, gifts, bonuses, commissions to employees, management, administrators, contractors or providers of the Parties, public officials, members of popularly-elected bodies or political parties, with the purpose of inducing such persons to carry out an act or make a decision or use their influence with the objective of contributing in order to obtain or retain business transactions related to the Master Service Contract.

 

(iii) Refrain from producing incorrect records or information or distributing information that affects the image of the other Party when it is based on unfounded conjectures.

 

(iv) Report to each other any deviation from the policy of conduct indicated in this clause.

 

Clause 15 Code of Good Governance and Asset Laundering Policies.

 

The Parties agree to respect and observe the Code of Good Governance and Policies of Loyalty and Transparency of CENIT and the Code of Good Governance and Asset Laundering Policy of ECOPETROL, which shall be available respectively on the websites of CENIT and ECOPETROL. In the event of conflicting provisions between the policies of CENIT and those of ECOPETROL, the Parties shall implement in good faith the dispute resolution procedure established in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 16 Responsibility

 

Section 16.01   Responsibility of the Parties.

 

 

24
 

 

(i) The Parties declare that they are aware of the conditions of public order and safety of the areas in which the purpose of the Master Service Contract will be carried out in whole or in part, and each Party assumes responsibility for its own risks arising from such conditions.

 

(ii) Each Party shall be exclusively responsible for damages incurred by third parties due to its activity. Specifically, each Party shall be responsible for any loss or damage to all third party property or third party injury, illness or death as a result of acts or omissions or those of its personnel or those of the personnel of its contractors.

 

(iii) Compliance with the pertinent legal obligations of each of the Parties, between them specifically including those related to their operation, their personnel, compliance with environmental policies, those related to the legality of rights of intellectual property, of tax provisions or any others of a similar nature, is the duty and exclusive responsibility of the Party with whom the referenced obligation rests, and any noncompliance shall only affect the referenced Party.

 

Section 16.02 Contractual liability of CENIT.

 

(i) With the exception of the provisions of numbers (ii) and (iii) of this Section and/or in each Chapter within the Master Service Contract, CENIT shall be liable in all cases for damages incurred by ECOPETROL that are generated, derived from or related to, breach in whole or in part by CENIT, by act or omission, of the obligations contained in this Master Service Contract.

 

(ii) CENIT shall be liable for damages arising from breach in the availability of Firm Capacity in any events in which the latter is under the Minimum Firm Capacity Availability established in Section 3.03 of the General Conditions.

 

(iii) CENIT shall only be exonerated in whole or in part from liability for failure to perform or for defective or late performance of its obligations under this Master Service Contract if it provides full proof that the cause of the damage is due to a Justified Event and that it also made all Reasonable Efforts.

 

Section 16.03 Contractual liability of ECOPETROL. ECOPETROL shall be liable for damages incurred by CENIT that are generated, derived from or related to, breach in whole or in part by ECOPETROL by act or omission of the obligations under this Master Service Contract, except when there are grounds for exemption from liability in accordance with the law.

 

Clause 17 Indemnity

 

Section 17.01    CENIT agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold ECOPETROL, parent companies of ECOPETROL, subordinate companies of ECOPETROL (excluding CENIT), directors of ECOPETROL, officers of ECOPETROL, representatives and/or employees of ECOPETROL harmless from any claim, complaint, litigation, legal or non-legal action, argument and judgment of any type or nature filed or that may be filed against any of them by third parties, arising from or related to the activities of Crude Oil Transportation, Crude Oil Storage, Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading, Crude Oil Loading at Ports and Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading, except when it is due to events of bad faith or gross negligence of ECOPETROL.

 

25
 

 

Consequently all costs and expenses necessary for repair or compensation of such damages, costs, expenses or loss will be borne exclusively by CENIT, as well as legal and non-legal costs incurred and attorneys’ fees.

 

Section 17.02    ECOPETROL agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold CENIT, directors of CENIT, officers of CENIT, representatives and/or employees of CENIT harmless from any claim, complaint, litigation, legal or non-legal action, argument and judgment of any type or nature filed or that may be filed against any of them by third parties, arising from or related to the performance of the obligations of ECOPETROL under this Master Service Contract, except when due to events of bad faith or gross negligence of CENIT.

 

Section 17.03    CENIT and/or ECOPETROL, as applicable (hereinafter the “ Claimant Party ”), may file claims or the pertinent actions to enforce the indemnity set forth in Sections 17.01. and 17.02 of Clause 17 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, subject to the procedure established below:

 

Section 17.04    Indemnity claim procedure.

 

(i) In the event that either of the Claimant Parties seeks to be held harmless or defended in the event of the indemnity obligations provided in this Clause, the interested Claimant Party shall notify the other party (hereinafter the “ Respondent Party ”) promptly regarding the process, claim or loss.

 

(ii) In the case of court orders, the Claimant Party shall answer the complaint promptly and implead or file a formal accusation against the Respondent Party, as applicable, unless the Parties reach a direct mutual agreement. The Respondent Party may not allege or file an exception on the existence of an arbitration clause in this Master Service Contract.

 

(iii) In the case of administrative procedures, the Claimant Party shall file any timely recourse allowed by governmental channels.

 

The Parties may agree at any time that the Respondent Party shall directly assume the legal or administrative defense of the Claimant Party. In such event, the Claimant Party shall collaborate and provide assistance to the Respondent Party in order to take necessary or advisable measures in the course of the process, including conferring powers of attorney.

 

The Parties agree that neither the Claimant Party nor the Respondent Party may conciliate, settle or in any other way agree or commit to any aspect of the procedure by means of which the Claimant Party seeks to be held harmless or defended by the Respondent Party, without the prior consent of the other Party, unless settlement, conciliation or consent includes the unconditional release of the Claimant Party or of the Respondent Party, as the case may be, from all liability within the process. The aforementioned requested consent may not be unreasonably denied or delayed by the Party from whom such consent was requested.

 

26
 

 

(iv) The Claimant Party and the Respondent Party shall work closely and consistently together regarding the situation and the status of any action or means of defense that the Claimant Party may have initiated or filed. If the Parties agree that the Respondent Party would assume the defense directly, the latter shall keep the Claimant Party informed about the status of the process. Likewise, the Claimant Party must inform the Respondent Party of the status of the process.

 

(v) After the process is concluded, as applicable, the Respondent Party shall be obligated to pay the Claimant Party within a period of not more than sixty (60) Days following receipt by the Respondent Party of the Claimant Party’s written communication regarding the conclusion of the process, and the amount established in the ruling, decision, award or act that ends the process, including all applicable interests, default and penalties, as set forth in the respective proceeding.

 

(vi) In the event that the decision of the Respondent Party is not to initiate or file actions or means of defense or, as applicable, the respective response to charges and clarifications are not submitted, the Respondent Party shall proceed to pay the Claimant Party the pertinent amount according to the notification received of third-party claim, and as of the payment date shall be released from any liability due to the aforementioned procedure or court order.

 

(vii) The defense strategy shall endeavor to ensure that the Claimant Party is not subject to attachment or other loss. If such precautionary measures, attachment or similar processes are ordered that affect the operations of the Claimant Party, the Respondent Party shall take the pertinent legal steps to lift or suspend such measures, doing so promptly and diligently.

 

(viii) With regard to any claim of the Claimant Party pursuant to the provisions of this Master Service Contract, the Respondent Party shall make the pertinent payment:

 

(a) Within sixty (60) Days following the date the claim was made, in the event that it concerns a matter regarding which there is no dispute between the Parties; or

 

(b) Within sixty (60) Days following the date of the final ruling or the agreement reached regarding the claim, in the event of a dispute between the Parties involved.

 

(ix) The Parties agree to cooperate to the greatest extent possible in connection with any third-party claim regarding which indemnity may or may not be demanded under this Master Service Contract.

 

27
 

 

Section 17.05     If subsequent to the date the respective legal or administrative process is concluded, a Dispute arises between the Parties with respect to the indemnity obligation, the same shall be resolved by means of the mechanisms established in Clause 23 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 18 Confidentiality

 

Section 18.01     The Parties agree to maintain strictly confidential without disclosing to anyone the information notified as confidential (hereinafter the “ Information ”), that was furnished during the performance of this Master Service Contract and during the activities of ECOPETROL and/or of CENIT.

 

Section 18.02     Notwithstanding the foregoing, Information may be disclosed only in the following cases:

 

(i) When disclosure of the Information is required by law;

 

(ii) When disclosure of the Information is ordered by a competent authority;

 

(iii) When the Information in question is of the public domain, without being due to any act or omission of the Parties; or

 

(iv) When the person who provided the information has authorized it previously in writing in each case.

 

Section 18.03    For any Information that must be or needs to be disclosed as stipulated in the foregoing sections, the disclosure in question shall only take place after consultation, if the deadline granted by law or the authorities who ordered disclosure of the Information permits, with the Party who provided the Information. In cases in which it is not possible to implement the period granted by law or the authorities to disclose the Information, the Party disclosing the Information shall subsequently inform the other Party of the referenced disclosure.

 

Section 18.04     In addition, the Information shall be understood as being available for disclosure to employees, advisors and officers of the Parties.

 

Section 18.05    The Parties may disclose the Information without prior written consent of the other to an Affiliate company, provided that the Parties guarantee that the aforementioned Affiliate company shall observe the confidentiality terms and other conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

28
 

 

Section 18.06     In all cases, the Parties shall ensure that the individuals to whom the Information is disclosed maintain such Information confidential and refrain from disclosing it. The Parties shall be responsible for any disclosure of Information by their employees, advisors, and officers. If the Parties become aware of an unauthorized disclosure of Information, it shall be immediately notified to the other Party, and they shall jointly take all measures necessary and/or advisable to prevent other disclosures of Information in the future.

 

Section 18.07    The Parties shall only use or allow use of the disclosed Information in the performance of this Master Service Contract in order to comply with it. Disclosure of Information under this Master Service Contract shall not grant any other right.

 

Section 18.08     The Parties shall be responsible if, through negligent acts or omissions, they disclose or make any Information public outside the terms provided hereunder in accordance with the law.

 

Section 18.09     Either of the Parties may demand return of the Information at any time following written notification to the other Party. Within thirty (30) Days following receipt of such notification, the receiving Party shall return all original Information and shall destroy or ensure destruction of all copies and reproductions (in any form, including but not limited to electronic means) that it has in its possession or in possession of individuals to whom it was disclosed under this Master Service Contract. In all cases, at the end of the Completion Period of the Master Service Contract, each of the Parties shall return to the other Party all original Information and destroy or ensure destruction of all copies and reproductions (in any form, including but not limited to electronic means) that it has in its possession or in possession of individuals to whom it was disclosed under this Master Service Contract.

 

Section 18.10 During the Completion Period, the Parties are required to keep confidential and not disclose the Information expressly identified in writing by each of them that is protected by copyright or industrial secrecy according to current laws, which is directly delivered by one of the Parties to the other due to the performance of the Master Service Contract, and agree not to provide such Information to third parties, unless ordered to do so by legal or administrative authorities or in events in which current legal provisions so order.

 

This confidentiality Clause shall remain in effect after termination of the Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 19 Suspension

 

Section 19.01   Suspension of the Services. Provision of the Services may be suspended in part when:

 

(i) In the case of Justified Events. In these cases the affected Party shall notify the other Party, first by the most expeditious means and later in writing within a maximum period of twenty-four (24) hours regarding the respective situation, indicating the events that brought about the Justified Event. Also, the lifting of the Justified Event and its consequences will be communicated in writing within twenty-four (24) hours of the conclusion of the respective Justified Event.

 

29
 

 

The Party affected by a Justified Event is required to do everything reasonably advisable and possible, under extraordinary conditions, to mitigate and minimize the effects of the Justified Event, as well as to overcome them as soon as possible.

 

Partial suspension of the Services does not authorize either of the Parties to interrupt performance of their other contractual obligations that are not affected by the partial suspension.

 

(ii) Due to causes not attributable to CENIT it does not have the permits, licenses or authorizations required to perform the Services, without prejudice to the responsibility of CENIT under the provisions of Sections 8.01 and 16.02 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

(iii) Causes attributable to CENIT that make it impossible to perform the Services, without prejudice to CENIT’s contractual liability for breach of its obligations.

 

(iv) Negligent breach by ECOPETROL except when it is a matter of disputed amounts of money. Negligent breach shall be considered to exist when ECOPETROL has failed to comply with its payment obligations after the grace period has expired and the credit limit stipulated between the Parties is reached.

 

Section 19.02    Suspension of the Services shall not affect the authority of ECOPETROL to search for and implement alternatives that allow it to ensure supply of suspended Services directly by another provider, regarding which CENIT may not make claims or request any compensation.

 

Section 19.03    ECOPETROL shall not be required to pay the Rate for Services that have been suspended or have not been performed due to the occurrence of the events established in numbers (ii) and (iii) of Section 19.01.

 

30
 

 

Section 19.04    ECOPETROL shall be required to pay the Rate for Services that are suspended or not performed due to occurrence of the event indicated in number (iv) of Section 19.01.

 

Section 19.05    In the case of suspension of the Crude Oil Transportation Service due to occurrence of a Justified Event in the Caño Limón Coveñas Oil Pipeline and/or the Transandino Oil Pipeline, pursuant to the provisions of number (i) of Section 19.01, the following procedure shall apply:

 

(i) When during the same Calendar Year, one or more Justified Events are alleged by CENIT, jointly or separately, as a cause of suspension of the Crude Oil Transportation Service by any of the aforementioned Oil Pipelines, ECOPETROL shall be required to pay the lower price in effect at the time of the suspension between operating and maintenance costs or the current Transportation Rate recognized by the Ministry of Mines and Energy or the entity acting in its stead, applicable to Firm Capacity under the “Ship or Pay” modality.

 

If, within the same Calendar Year, the Crude Oil Transportation Services have been suspended for continuous or discontinuous periods whose total exceeds one hundred and eighty (180) Days after the first Day of suspension, ECOPETROL, after Day one hundred and eighty-one (181) of the suspension, shall not be required to pay any amount to CENIT until the pertinent Service is recommenced.

 

(ii) When during the same Calendar Year one or more Justified Events are alleged by ECOPETROL, jointly or separately, as a cause of suspension of the Transportation Service by any of the aforementioned Oil Pipelines, ECOPETROL shall not be required to pay the Transportation Rate for Crude Oil Transportation Services until day one hundred and eighty (180) of the suspension.

 

If during the same Calendar Year the Services have been suspended for continuous or discontinuous periods that exceed one hundred and eighty (180) Days following the first Day of suspension, ECOPETROL shall be required to pay the Transportation Rate for Firm Capacity under the Ship or Pay modality as of Day one hundred eighty-one (181) of the suspension, until the requirement for Crude Oil Transportation Services by ECOPETROL is recommenced.

 

Section 19.06     For other Assets and Services, in the case of suspension or failure to provide the Services due to a Justified Event, in accordance with the provisions of number (i) of Section 19.01, the following procedure shall apply:

 

(i) When during the same Calendar Year one or more Justified Events are alleged by CENIT, jointly or separately, as a cause of suspension of one or more Services for one or more Assets in particular, ECOPETROL, during the first ninety (90) Days of suspension, shall be required to pay the Rate for Firm Capacity under the Ship or Pay modality for the suspended Services.

 

If during the same Calendar Year the Services for particular Assets have been suspended for continuous or discontinuous periods that exceed ninety (90) Days following the first Day of suspension, ECOPETROL shall not be required to pay the Rate until the pertinent Service is recommenced.

 

31
 

 

(ii) When during the same Calendar Year one or more Justified Events are alleged by ECOPETROL, jointly or separately, as a cause for suspension of one or more Services for one or more of the Assets, ECOPETROL shall not be required to pay the Rate pertaining to Firm Capacity under the Ship or Pay modality for suspended Services.

 

If during the same Calendar Year the Services have been suspended for continuous or discontinuous periods that exceed ninety (90) Days following the first Day of suspension, ECOPETROL shall be required to pay the Rate as of Day ninety-one (91) of suspension, until the requirement for Crude Oil Transportation Services by ECOPETROL is recommenced.

 

Clause 20 Termination of the Master Service Contract

 

This Master Service Contract will terminate:

 

(i) Due to expiration of the stipulated Completion Period; or

 

(ii) By mutual agreement of the Parties.

 

Clause 21 Final settlement of the Master Service Contract

 

After termination of the Master Service Contract, the Parties shall sign the record of finalization of performance.

 

The Parties shall prepare the final settlement of the Master Service Contract by mutual agreement within six (6) months following the Termination Date of the Master Service Contract. For such purpose ECOPETROL shall prepare the record of finalization, which shall be submitted for review by CENIT.

 

If CENIT does not agree on the final settlement or there is no agreement regarding its content within the aforementioned term, ECOPETROL may independently make a final settlement in one (1) month, which in any case is not binding on CENIT and may be challenged by the latter.

 

The record of final settlement shall expressly set forth the following:

 

(i) Declaration regarding compliance of obligations of each of the Parties in the performance of the Master Service Contract; and

 

(ii) Any agreements, conciliations and settlements reached by the Parties in order to finalize differences and prepare a no-debt certificate.

 

32
 

 

After final settlement of the Master Service Contract, each Party shall pay the other any amounts owed for any reason that are obtained in the final settlement procedure, after making any pertinent deductions.

 

Clause 22 Assignment and subcontracting

 

Section 22.01     The Parties shall have the right to assign or transfer in whole or in part their interests, rights and obligations under this Master Service Contract according to the rules established herein. Any assignment or transfer that is contrary to the aforementioned rules shall not be valid or binding on the other Party.

 

Section 22.02   Assignment by CENIT. CENIT may assign in whole or in part the rights and obligations under this Master Service Contract provided that it does not affect the rights of ECOPETROL to the Services. Any assignment of rights and obligations that affects the rights of ECOPETROL under this Master Service Contract shall require prior written approval from ECOPETROL, except when the assignment is made to a subordinate or controlling company of CENIT.

 

For purposes of the provisions of this number, CENIT shall submit a written request for approval, indicating the essential elements of the transaction, such as possible parties, rights and obligations, scope of the assignment and the manner they affect or may affect the referenced rights of ECOPETROL. ECOPETROL shall have a period of thirty (30) Days following delivery of the request for approval to provide the decision to accept or reject the request. If ECOPETROL fails to answer within such term, the assignment shall be considered approved.

 

Section 22.03    Assignment by ECOPETROL. ECOPETROL may assign in part or in whole the rights and obligations under this Master Service Contract provided that it does not affect the rights of CENIT under this Master Service Contract.

 

Any assignment of rights and obligations that affects the rights of CENIT under this Master Service Contract shall require prior written approval from CENIT, except when the assignment is made to a subordinate or controlling company of ECOPETROL.

 

For purposes of the provisions of this number, ECOPETROL shall submit a written request for approval, indicating the essential elements of the transaction, such as possible parties, rights and obligations, scope of the assignment and the manner they affect or may affect the referenced rights of CENIT. CENIT shall have a term of thirty (30) Days following delivery of the request for approval to provide the decision to accept or reject the request. If CENIT fails to answer within such term, the assignment shall be considered approved.

 

CENIT may require the assignee to provide an adequate guarantee to the satisfaction of the former with respect to the obligations that are assumed.

 

In no case shall ECOPETROL be jointly responsible to CENIT or to third parties with the assignee in the event of assignment of the Master Service Contract.

 

33
 

 

The provisions of this Section shall not apply to assignments of rights to Firm Capacity provided under Section 3.05 number (iii) of the General Conditions.

 

Section 22.04    Subcontracting. CENIT may subcontract all or part of the obligations for the provision of the Services. In all cases:

 

(i) CENIT shall maintain control and supervision of activities of its subcontractors.

 

(ii) CENIT shall continue to be the sole party responsible to ECOPETROL for compliance of its obligations under this Master Service Contract.

 

(iii) There shall be no contractual connection between ECOPETROL and subcontractors of CENIT.

 

(iv) Any complaint, claim or petition of a subcontractor of CENIT shall be entirely addressed by CENIT.

 

(v) No breach by subcontractors of CENIT shall be considered a Justified Event, extraneous cause or exculpatory circumstance for CENIT vis-à-vis ECOPETROL.

 

Clause 23 Dispute and Direct Settlement

 

(i) Any disagreement or dispute that arises between the Parties due to or as a result of this Master Service Contract, or anything related (hereinafter the “ Dispute ”), shall be resolved through the mechanisms indicated in this Clause, subject to prior written notification from one Party to the other regarding the existence of the Dispute (hereinafter the “ Notice of Dispute ”).

 

(ii) The individuals authorized by CENIT and ECOPETROL shall attempt to reach a direct settlement that definitively resolves the Dispute, set out in writing, within sixty (60) Days following the date the Notice of Dispute is sent. If the Parties reach a direct settlement in writing pursuant to this provision, it shall have the effects of a settlement and shall be confidential in the terms of the confidentiality clause of this Master Service Contract and shall not constitute an admission of liability or proof thereof, unless expressly stipulated to the contrary. Also, documents exchanged by the Parties as a result of the Dispute shall also be confidential in the terms of the confidentiality clause of this Master Service Contract.

 

(iii) If the term indicated in number (ii) above expires without the Parties reaching a direct settlement in writing, the Dispute shall be resolved according to the following sections, as applicable.

 

34
 

 

Clause 24             Disputes of a Technical Nature or regarding Review of Rates other than the Crude Oil Transportation Service.

 

Section 24.01 Any Dispute of a technical nature or that arises in the event of the provisions established in Section 5.05 of the General Conditions concerning review of Rates other than those applicable to the Crude Oil Transportation Service, which cannot be settled directly according to the procedure provided in Clause 23 of the General Conditions, shall be submitted to conciliation before the Conciliation Center of the Chamber of Commerce of Bogota so that within thirty (30) Days following the date of expiration of the term indicated in number (ii) of Clause 23 the Parties may endeavor to reach an agreement regarding the Dispute.

 

If a conciliator is not appointed, he may be appointed at the request of either of the Parties by the director of the Arbitration Center of the Bogota Chamber of Commerce.

 

Clause 25 Arbitration

 

Section 25.01    Without prejudice to the provisions of Clause 24, if the Dispute is not resolved through a direct settlement and the Parties have exhausted the procedure set out in Clause 23, it shall be resolved definitively by arbitration in accordance with the following provisions:

 

(i) The Tribunal shall consist of three (3) arbitrators appointed by mutual agreement between the Parties.

 

(ii) If the Parties fail to designate the arbitrators by mutual agreement within the period of twenty (20) days from the date of the request to convene the Tribunal, the arbitrators shall be appointed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Center of the Bogota Chamber of Commerce from said Center’s “A List” of arbitrators.

 

(iii) The Tribunal shall be based in the city of Bogota, Capital District.

 

(iv) The proceedings shall be carried out in Spanish.

 

(v) The arbitration shall be governed by the rules set out in Colombian law for domestic institutional arbitration and shall be administered by the Arbitration and Conciliation Center of the Bogota Chamber of Commerce.

 

(vi) Upon accepting their appointments, the arbitrators must declare their independence and impartiality to act as arbitrators in the dispute to the Parties in writing.

 

(vii) The arbitration shall be arbitration at law.

 

35
 

 

Section 25.02     Neither Party may invoke the arbitration clause as the basis for:

 

(i) Avoiding or objecting to being impleaded by the other Party in legal proceedings that affect one of the Parties, and in respect to which an indemnity obligation exists under the terms of this Master Service Contract.

 

(ii) Avoiding or making a legal objection to a complaint in legal proceedings that affect one of the Parties, and in respect to which an indemnity obligation exists under the terms of this Master Service Contract.

 

(iii) Obstructing or hindering in any way the indemnity rights set out in favor of the Parties in this Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 26 Taxes   

 

All national, departmental, district or municipal taxes, contributions, rates, surcharges and duties that are levied due to the signing, execution and final settlement of this Master Service Contract shall be the responsibility of the Party to which that payment corresponds by law.

 

Clause 27 Guarantees

 

Given that (i) CENIT is a subsidiary of ECOPETROL and (ii) in addition to this Master Service Contract, ECOPETROL and CENIT have entered into an Operation, Maintenance and Project Management Contract, the Parties agree that this Master Service Contract shall not create the obligation for either Party to provide guarantees.

 

Clause 28 Notifications

 

(i) The communications and invoices to be sent between CENIT and ECOPETROL by virtue of this Master Service Contract shall be valid when made in writing and delivered, at the election of the issuing party, by fax, e-mail or any other means through which their having been sent and received may be verified (with acknowledgment of receipt and verification by mail).

 

(ii) All communications shall be considered received and shall enter into effect:

 

(a) On the date of receipt, if delivered personally, or

 

(b) Twenty-four (24) hours after the date of transmission, if transmitted by fax, e-mail or any other means through which their having been sent and received may be verified, provided that confirmation is received within the following eight (8) Days, whichever comes first.

 

36
 

 

(iii) Each Party may change its address for the purposes set out in this Master Service Contract, subject to making written notice to the other Party fifteen (15) Days prior to the date indicated for the change.

 

(iv) All notices and communications that the Parties must make with regard to the performance of this Contract shall be made to the following addresses:

 

ECOPETROL

 

Address Carrera 7 No. 37 – 69 Piso 9 Edificio Teusacá
Contact Alvaro Castañeda Caro
Telephone 2343491
Fax 2343532
City Bogotá D.C.
E-mail alvaro.castañeda@ecopetrol.com.co

 

CENIT

 

Address Carrera 9 76 49 Piso 4
Contact Camilo Marulanda López
Telephone 3198800
Fax 3198700
City Bogotá D.C.
E-mail camilo.marulanda@cenit-transporte.com

 

Clause 29 Domicile

 

The contractual domicile for all legal and procedural effects and purposes shall be the city of Bogota, Capital District.

 

Clause 30 Applicable Law

 

For all effects and purposes, this Master Service Contract shall be governed by the laws of the Republic of Colombia.

 

Clause 31 Entire Agreement and Amendments  

 

Section 31.01    Integrity.

 

(i) This Master Service Contract contains the full and complete terms accepted and agreed by the Parties to govern the legal transaction with respect to the Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL of the Assets, as well as the Services that CENIT shall provide thereunder. The Parties mutually agree to fully invalidate all agreements, pacts, contracts, understandings or dialogues that they may have undertaken prior to the Date of Signature in relation with the Services and Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL.

 

37
 

 

(ii) The following documents form an integral part of the Master Service Contract:

 

Chapter I – Crude Oil Transportation Service

 

ANNEX TC-1 Quality Specifications.
   
ANNEX TC-2 Pipelines.
   
ANNEX TC-3 CENIT Transporter Manual .
   
ANNEX TC-4 ECOPETROL Transporter Manual.
   
ANNEX TC-5 Caño Limón–Coveñas Pipeline Transporter Manual.
   
ANNEX TC-6 Crude Oil Transportation Rates for each Pipeline.
   
ANNEX TC-7 Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL for each Pipeline.
   
ANNEX TC-8 Pipeline Entry and Exit Points.
   
ANNEX TC-9 CENIT Measurement Manual.
   
ANNEX TC-10 Segregated Crude Oil by Pipeline .

 

Chapter III - Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service

 

ANNEX DCC-1 Crude Oil Quality Specifications.
   
ANNEX DCC-2 Unloading Platforms.
   
ANNEX DCC-3 Crude Oil Unloading Rates.
   
ANNEX DCC-4 Operating and Unloading Standards.
   
ANNEX DCC-5 Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL for each Unloading Platform.
   
ANNEX DCC-6 Unloading Platform Entry and Exit Points.
   
ANNEX DCC-7 CENIT Measurement Manual.

 

Chapter IV - Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports

 

ANNEX CCP-1 Ports.

 

38
 

 

ANNEX CCP-2 Rates for Crude Oil Loading Services at Ports.
   
ANNEX CCP-3 Crude Oil Removal Procedure.
   
ANNEX CCP-4 Port Operations Regulations.
   
ANNEX CCP-5 CENIT Measurement Manual.
   
ANNEX CCP-6 Procedure for Resolving Delays.
   
ANNEX CCP-7 Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL at Ports.
   
ANNEX CCP-8 Port Entry and Exit Points.
   
ANNEX CCP-9 Procedure for Scheduling Windows.
   
ANNEX CCP-10 Crude Oil Quality Specifications for Loading at Ports.
   
ANNEX CCP-11 MARPOL .

 

(iii) If any provision of this Master Service Contract is prohibited, annulled, deemed inoperative or cannot be enforced under applicable law, the remaining provisions shall survive with full force and binding effect on the Parties, unless the prohibited, annulled, inoperative or unenforceable provision were essential to it, in such a manner that its interpretation or enforcement would be impossible in the absence of said provision. In this case, the Parties agree to negotiate a legally valid clause in good faith with the same purpose as the annulled, inoperative or unenforceable provision or provisions.

 

(iv) The termination of this Master Service Contract shall not release the Parties from any obligation owed to the other Party hereunder, nor from any loss, cost, damage, outlay, expense or liability that may arise under this Master Service Contract prior to or as a result of such termination.

 

Therefore, upon the termination of this Master Service Contract, Clauses 1, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 30, amongst others, shall survive.

 

Section 31.02    Amendments. Only those amendments to this Master Service Contract and its Chapters and annexes which are recorded in a document signed by both Parties shall be valid.

 

Clause 32 Execution of the Contract

 

The Master Service Contract shall only be deemed executed once it has been signed.

 

39
 

 

Clause 33 Legal and Contractual Requirements for Performance

 

The performance of the Master Service Contract may only begin after the Commencement Date.

 

Clause 34 Definitions

 

A

Additional Capacity: means capacity in addition to the Firm Capacity for each of the Services to which ECOPETROL shall be entitled under the Master Service Contract and which shall be calculated in BPCD.

 

Affiliate: means: (i) any person who directly or indirectly controls any of the Parties; (ii) a legal entity that is controlled directly by the Parties; (iii) a legal entity that is controlled indirectly by either of the Parties through its subsidiaries. A situation of control shall be understood to exist when the events set out in Article 261 of the Commercial Code take place.

 

API: means (i) the “American Petroleum Institute” or (ii) a unit for measuring density, recognized around the world as one of the selling properties of Hydrocarbons. It is defined as follows: API = 141.5/SG-131.5, where SG is specific gravity.

 

Assets: means the infrastructure and/or assets transferred by ECOPETROL to CENIT on occasion of the assets transfer referred to in the Asset Contribution Contract.

 

Asset Contribution Contract: the Contract through which ECOPETROL transfers infrastructure or assets that it owns, leases or licenses to CENIT.

 

ASTM: means the “American Society for Testing Materials.”

 

Available Capacity: for a given period, it is the difference between the effective capacity and the sum of: (i) the Owner’s Capacity, (ii) the Contracted Capacity, and (iii) the Preferential Right.

 

Available Capacity of CENIT Assets: for purposes of this Master Service Contract, for Pipelines, and for a given period, it means the difference between the Effective Capacity and the sum of: (i) the Contracted Capacity and (ii) the Preferential Right, which is available for the transportation of Crude Oil from third parties in exercise of the right to free access to Pipelines.

 

For the Caño Limón – Coveñas Pipeline, according to the Caño Limón – Coveñas Pipeline Transporter Manual for the Transportation Contract for Crude Oil Owned by OXY entered into by and between ECOPETROL and Occidental de Colombia Inc. and Occidental de Andina Inc., it shall be understood that, for a determined period, it is the difference between the effective capacity and the sum of: (i) the Owner’s Capacity, (ii) the Contracted Capacity and (iii) the Preferential Right, which is available for the transportation of Crude Oil from third parties under the terms set out in the Caño Limón – Coveñas Pipeline Transporter Manual.

 

For the other services it shall mean the difference between the Effective Capacity and the Contracted Capacity in a given period.

 

40
 

  

B

 

Balance for Shipper: means the Volumetric Balance for each of the Shippers that use the Pipeline.

 

It shall also mean the Volumetric Balance for each of the Shippers or users of the other Services.

 

Barrel: a unit of volume for Crude Oil equal to forty-two (42) United States gallons. Every gallon is equivalent to three liters and seven thousand eight hundred and fifty-three ten-thousandths of a liter (3.7853).

 

Barrels per Calendar Day (BPCD): means a unit of measurement of flow Rate with respect to the average value of a given period.

 

Barrels per Operational Day (BPOD): means a unit of measurement of flow Rate with respect to the days actually operated.

 

 

C

 

Calendar Month: means the period of time that begins at 00:00:01 hours on the first day of a calendar month and ends at 24:00 hours on the last day of the same calendar month, always referring to Colombian time.

 

Calendar Year: means the term that begins at 00:00:01 hours on January first (1 st ) of each year and ends on December thirty-first (31 st ) of the same year at 24:00 hours, always referring to Colombian time.

 

Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL: means all of the capacity committed to ECOPETROL by CENIT for the provision of the Services by CENIT under the Master Service Contract, including the Firm Capacity and Additional Capacity modalities.

 

CENIT: means the company CENIT Transporte y Logística de Hidrocarburos S.A.S., as it is identified at the beginning of the Master Service Contract.

 

Claimant Party: means any of the Parties entering into this Master Service Contract that initiates a claim or actions designed to collect indemnity.

 

 

41
 

   

Commencement Date: means the date that the Certificate of Commencement is signed or the date expressly provided therein.

 

Connection: means the installation that allows the Delivery of Crude Oil to the Pipeline and/or the Removal of Crude Oil from the Pipeline.

 

Contracted Capacity: in accordance with Resolution 18 1258 of 2010, it means the capacity committed for transportation between CENIT and the Shippers.

 

Contracted Capacity Subject to Availability: for Crude Oil Transportation Service, it means the Contracted Capacity which CENIT commits to a Shipper, calculated in BPCD, subject to the existence of Unused Capacity.

 

For Crude Oil Storage Service, Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service, Crude Oil Loading Services at Ports and Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service, it means the capacity of the assets or infrastructure committed by CENIT through contracts for the provision of such services.

 

Coordination of Operations: means the set of activities carried out by CENIT to control the development of the Crude Oil Transportation Program and to ensure its implementation.

 

Crude Oil: Petroleum, as it is defined in Article 1 of the Petroleum Code, which exists in liquid form in natural underground deposits and remains liquid at atmospheric pressure after going through the surface separation facilities, as well as the products required to facilitate its transportation, such as Diluents.

 

Crude Oil for Transportation: means the Crude Oil delivered to the Pipeline for transportation. This category includes Inspected Crude Oils, both segregated or separated from others, as well as those mixed with them, and in both cases they may be mixed with any other substance for transportation purposes.

 

Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports: means the Port services to be provided to ECOPETROL by CENIT at the Ports for ECOPETROL Crude Oil, the rules for which are included in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports Chapter (Chapter IV), and its annexes.

 

Crude Oil Storage Rate: means the monetary compensation that ECOPETROL must pay to CENIT for the Crude Oil Storage Service.

 

Crude Oil Storage Service: means the storage service for ECOPETROL Crude Oil, to be provided to ECOPETROL by CENIT, the rules for which are included in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, Crude Oil Storage Service Chapter (Chapter II), and its annexes.

 

 

42
 

 

Crude Oil Transportation Program: the program of Pipeline Operations for an Operation Month prepared by CENIT based on the transportation Nomination cycle.

 

For the Caño Limón – Coveñas Pipeline, according to the Caño Limón – Coveñas Pipeline Transporter Manual for the Transportation Contract for Crude Oil Owned by OXY and entered into by and between ECOPETROL, Occidental de Colombia Inc. and Occidental de Andina Inc., it means the program of Pipeline Operations for an Operation Month prepared by CENIT based on the transportation Nomination cycle. It specifies the use of the Effective Capacity, the volumes of Crude Oil entering at the Entry Points, and the volumes of Crude Oil coming out of the system at the Exit Points.

 

For all other Services, it means the operating program for Tanks, Unloading Platforms, loading at Ports and loading into tank trucks for an Operating Month prepared by CENIT based on the transportation Nomination cycle and included in the Crude Oil Transportation Program.

 

Crude Oil Transportation Rate: the single monetary value, per Barrel transported across a span, which CENIT charges all Shippers under equal conditions, and which is the basis for paying the transportation tax in accordance with the provisions of Articles 56 and 57 of the Petroleum Code, as regulated by Ministry of Mines and Energy Resolutions 12 4386 of 2010 and 12 4547 of 2010. The surcharges, rebates and discounts set out in the Monetary Conditions shall be applied to this Rate.

 

For the Caño Limón – Coveñas Pipeline, according to the Caño Limón – Coveñas Pipeline Transporter Manual for the Transportation Contract for Crude Oil Owned by OXY and entered into by and between ECOPETROL, Occidental de Colombia Inc. and Occidental de Andina Inc., it means the single monetary value, per Barrel transported across a span, which CENIT charges Shippers. The surcharges, rebates and discounts set out in the Monetary Conditions shall be applied to this Rate.

 

Crude Oil Transportation Service: means the transportation service for ECOPETROL Crude Oil through the Pipelines, to be provided to ECOPETROL by CENIT, the rules for which are included in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, Crude Oil Transportation Service Chapter (Chapter I), and its annexes.

 

 

D

 

Date of Signature: means the date on which this Master Service Contract is signed, indicated at the beginning of the General Conditions in this Master Service Contract.

 

 

43
 

 

Day or Days: shall be calendar day or calendar days, respectively.

 

Declared Value: means the value of ECOPETROL Crude Oil at the moment that it is handed over to CENIT at the Entry Point.

 

Delivery: means the action by which the custody of a volume of the Shipper’s Crude Oil is transferred to CENIT for transportation through the Pipeline.

 

For all other Services it means the action by which the custody of a volume of the Shipper’s Crude Oil is transferred to CENIT for storage in Tanks, unloading at Unloading Platforms, loading into tank truck, or loading at Ports.

 

Design Capacity: The anticipated capacity for the Pipeline based on the properties of the Crude Oil and the specifications of the equipment and other related infrastructure used for system design calculations. If the system design is modified to increase the design capacity, that shall be the new capacity.

 

For the other services it means anticipated capacity, based on the properties of the Crude Oil and the specifications of equipment and other related infrastructure used to calculate the design of the Tanks, Unloading Platforms, Ports and Loading Platforms.

 

Diluent: means the natural or refined product that is mixed with heavy Crude Oil to bring it up to Quality Specifications in order to facilitate transportation through each of the Pipelines.

 

For all other Services it means the natural or refined product that is mixed with heavy Crude Oil to bring it up to Quality Specifications in order to facilitate storage in Tanks, unloading at Unloading Platforms, loading into tank trucks or loading at Ports.

 

Dispute: It shall have the meaning assigned to it in Section 23 (i) of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

 

E

 

ECOPETROL: means ECOPETROL S.A., as it is identified at the beginning of this Master Service Contract.

 

ECOPETROL Crude Oil: means: (i) the Crude Oil owned by ECOPETROL and its Affiliates (not including CENIT), (ii) the fuel-oil owned by ECOPETROL and its Affiliates (not including CENIT), (iii) the Diluents owned by ECOPETROL and its Affiliates (not including CENIT) and (iv) any other product that may technically be transported through the Pipeline owned by ECOPETROL and its Affiliates (not including CENIT), subject to agreement with CENIT.

 

 

44
 

 

Effective Capacity: means the average maximum transportation capacity effectively made available. It is calculated as the product of the Nominal Capacity multiplied by the Service Factor.

 

For the other Services, it means the average maximum daily capacity that can effectively be made available. It is calculated as the product of the Nominal Capacity multiplied by the Service Factor.

 

Entry Hub: means the set of facilities located in a determined geographical area where the Shipper delivers the Crude Oil and at which a Span is started.

 

Entry Points: the exact Point in the system of transportation, storage, tank truck unloading, loading at Ports, and tank truck loading at which CENIT takes custody of the Crude Oil delivered by ECOPETROL at the Entry Hub. They are described in Annex TC-8 to the Crude Oil Transportation Service Chapter, Annex DCC-6 to the Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service Chapter and Annex CCP-9 to the Crude Oil Loading at Ports Chapter.

 

Excessive Withdrawal: means the volume of Crude Oil that has been withdrawn by a Shipper above the limits set out in the Crude Oil Transportation Program.

 

Exit Hub: means the set of facilities located in a determined geographical area where the Shipper withdraws the Crude Oil from the Pipeline and at which a Span ends.

 

 

F

 

Final Station: means the Pipeline’s final station.

 

Firm Capacity: means the capacity that includes “Ship or Pay” and “Ship and Pay” modalities for each of the Services to which ECOPETROL is entitled under the Master Service Contract, calculated in BPCD.

 

First Pumping Station: means the Pipeline’s first station.

 

 

G

 

Gross Barrel: means the volume of Crude Oil, including dissolved water, suspended water and suspended sediment, but excluding free water and bottom sediments, calculated at standard conditions (60°F and 14.7 lbf/in 2 , or 15°C and 1.01325 bar).

 

 

45
 

 

H

 

Hydrocarbon Quality: means the set of physicochemical characteristics that a volume of Crude Oil must have in order to be transported through the Pipeline under normal conditions. These characteristics refer to: viscosity, API gravity, specific gravity, percent by weight of sulfur, pour point, acidity, steam pressure, percent by volume of water, percent by weight of sediment and salt content, among other things.

 

This definition shall also include ECOPETROL Crude Oil that is delivered for the other Services.

 

 

I

 

Identifiable Losses: losses of Crude Oil that may be localized to a specific point along the Pipeline and which are attributable to specific events such as breakages, spills, theft, force majeure, or acts of nature.

 

For the Caño Limón – Coveñas Pipeline, according to the Caño Limón – Coveñas Pipeline Transporter Manual for the Transportation Contract for Crude Oil Owned by OXY entered into by and between ECOPETROL, Occidental de Colombia Inc. and Occidental de Andina Inc., it shall be understood as the losses of Crude Oil that may be localized to a specific point along the Pipeline and which are attributable to specific events such as breakages, spills or Justified Events.

 

For all other Services, it means the losses of Crude Oil that may be localized to a specific point in the Tank, Unloading Platform, Port, or Loading Platform and which are attributable to specific events such as breakages, spills, theft, force majeure, or acts of nature.

 

Indemnifying Party: means any of the Parties entering into this Master Service Contract that must indemnify the Claimant Party.

 

Information: Information classified as confidential in accordance with the rules set out in Clause 18 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Inspected Crude Oil: means Crude Oil that has been treated, dehydrated, degassed, drained, settled, stabilized and measured at the inspection facilities approved by the Ministry of Mines and Energy or the entity acting in its stead.

 

 

 

46
 

 

J

 

Justified Event: means any force majeure events or circumstances, acts of nature, acts by third parties, or the exclusive fault of the victim and/or defects of or inherent in the Crude Oil.

 

For the Caño Limón – Coveñas Pipeline, pursuant to the Caño Limón – Coveñas Pipeline Transporter Manual for the Transportation Contract for Crude Oil Owned by OXY entered into by and between ECOPETROL and Occidental de Colombia Inc. and Occidental de Andina Inc., it shall be understood as an event or circumstance beyond CENIT’s control cases such as extraneous causes, force majeure, acts of nature, actions by third parties or by the victim, labor disputes or any other type of actions by an organized labor force, external war (whether declared or not), civil war, sabotage, revolution, insurrection, riot, civil disturbance, terrorism, unlawful acts by third parties, epidemics, tornados, tsunamis, landslides, lightning, earthquakes, floods, storms, fire, adverse weather conditions, expropriation, nationalization, laws, regulations, or orders by a competent authority, explosions, damage or accidents involving machinery, equipment, piping, power transmission lines, or any other installations, embargos, the inability or delays in obtaining equipment or materials and/or defects of or inherent in the Crude Oil.

 

 

L

 

Line Fill : means the entire volume of Crude Oil that must be kept in the Pipelines permanently for operation.

 

Line Fill includes, but is not limited to the unpumpable bottoms of Tanks and the line fill for processes and equipment.

 

For all other Services it means the entire volume of Crude Oil that must be kept in the Tanks, Unloading Platforms and Ports for operation, including but not limited to the unpumpable bottoms of Tanks and the line fill for processes and equipment.

 

 

M

 

Marketing Rate: means the monetary compensation that ECOPETROL must pay to CENIT for its marketing of ECOPETROL’s Temporary Capacity Release.

 

Master Service Contract: means the General Conditions, their chapters, and the corresponding annexes.

 

Measurement Manual: means the document that contains the general conditions for measuring Crude Oil, which is attached as Annex TC-9 to the Crude Oil Transportation Service Chapter, DCC-7 and CCP-6 to the Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports Chapter, notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 5.01 of Chapter I and 4.01 of Chapter III.

 

 

 

47
 

 

Minimum Firm Capacity Availability: the minimum availability of ECOPETROL’s Firm Capacity that CENIT shall guarantee for each Asset. It shall be calculated according to the formula set out in Section 3.03 of the General Conditions.

 

Mixed Crude Oil or Mix: means the combination of different Crude Oils before and/or after being delivered to the Pipeline for transportation.

 

For all other Services, it means the combination of different Crude Oils before and/or after being delivered to the Tank, Unloading Platform, Port or Loading Platform.

 

Monetary Conditions: means the tables or formulas for calculating the surcharges and rebates for Hydrocarbon Quality, as well as the discounts that will apply to the Transportation Rate by Span for commercial concepts.

 

 

N

 

Net Barrel: means the volume of Crude Oil, excluding total water and total sediment, calculated at standard conditions (60°F and 14.7 lbf/in 2 , or 15°C and 1.01325 bar).

 

Nominal Capacity: means the maximum transportation capacity between a Pumping Station and a Pipeline terminal, or between two Pumping Stations, calculated by considering the equipment installed in the Pipeline and the anticipated Crude Oil quality for a determined period. It is expressed in BPOD.

 

For all other services it means the maximum capacity calculated by considering the equipment installed and the anticipated Crude Oil quality for a determined period.

 

Nominated Capacity: means the volume of Crude Oil that the Shipper or Third Party requests be transported through the Pipeline according to the communication sent to CENIT during the respective Nomination month in accordance with the procedures set out in the Transporter Manual.

 

Nomination: a Service Request for the Operational Month that specifies the required transportation volume, the Entry Hub, the Exit Hub and the Quality of the Hydrocarbon being transported.

 

For the other Services it means the corresponding Service request formalized by the Shipper for an Operation Month, which specifies the volume required for each Tank, Unloading Platform, Port, and Loading Platform, the Entry Point, the Exit Point, Hydrocarbon Quality and the ownership of the Crude Oil for which storage, unloading, loading at Ports and loading into tank trucks, respectively, has been requested.

 

48
 

 

 

Nomination Month: means the Calendar Month during which the Nomination process is carried out, which shall take place two (2) Calendar Months prior to the Operational Month.

 

Nonidentifiable Losses: the normal losses inherent in the operation of the Services corresponding to the following, among other things:

 

· Mixing.
· Drainage.
· Undetected illegal extractions.
· Defects in meter factors.
· Volumetric contraction.
· Leaks/escapes in the valves.
· Evaporation.
· Minor leakages.
· Uncertainties inherent in the measurement systems and associated instrumentation.
· Uncertainties inherent in laboratory analyses related to the liquidation of volumes.
· Propagation of the uncertainties inherent in internationally accepted procedures for the liquidation of volumes through static and dynamic measurement.

 

Notice of Dispute: shall have the meaning assigned to it in Section 23 (i) of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Notice of Resumption: means the written communication which CENIT shall send to ECOPETROL indicating the date on which the provision of the Service shall be resumed.

 

Notice of Suspension: means the written communication which CENIT shall send to ECOPETROL indicating the date on which the provision of a Service shall be suspended.

 

 

O

 

Operational Month: means the Calendar Month for which ECOPETROL has nominated each of the Services, and during which CENIT executes the Crude Oil Transportation Program for each Pipeline, Tank, Unloading Platform, loading at Ports and loading into tank trucks.

 

Operations Agent or Agent: means any individual or legal entity, whether public or private, with which technical and/or commercial relationships are maintained in the provision of Pipeline Crude Oil Transportation Service, Crude Oil Storage Service, Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service, Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports and Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service.

 

Operation and Maintenance Contract: The Contract through which ECOPETROL shall provide the operation, maintenance and complementary services for the infrastructure owned by CENIT.

 

49
 

 

Owner: in the case of Pipelines for private use, it is a set of operators or oil refining companies and their Affiliates, which the Colombian state allows to benefit from the Pipeline pursuant with Article 45 of the Petroleum Code.

 

Owner’s Capacity: for Crude Oil Transportation Service, it means the capacity necessary for a given period for the transportation of Crude Oil produced by CENIT.

 

 

P

 

Party or Parties: means CENIT or ECOPETROL, or both, according to the context in which the term is used.

 

Penalty Fee: means a charge in addition to the Crude Oil Transportation Rate corresponding to a penalty for the Shipper’s non-compliance with the Delivery Schedule, which shall be calculated as expressly indicated in the CENIT Transporter Manual.

 

Permanent Capacity Release: means the ECOPETROL Firm Capacity released permanently according to the rules set out in Section 3.05 (ii) of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Pipelines: all of the necessary physical installations for the transportation of Inspected Crude Oil from the Entry Hubs to the Exit Hubs, including the piping, pumping units, measuring stations, control systems and the Tanks to be used to operate the transportation system, among other things.

 

Pipeline Transportation Bulletin (PTB): means the Web page where CENIT makes information available to Agents and other stakeholders specified in Ministry of Mines and Energy Resolutions No. 18-1258 and No. 12-4386 of 2010, which regulate Crude Oil transportation by Pipelines and the methodology for setting Rates, respectively, or those which modify or replace them.

 

Platforms: all of the physical installations required for loading ECOPETROL Crude Oil onto tank trucks under the Master Service Contract.

 

Points of Exit: the exact Point in the system of transportation, storage, tank truck unloading, loading at Ports and tank truck loading at which ECOPETROL takes the Crude Oil delivered by CENIT at the Exit Hub and CENIT’s custody of the Crude Oil is brought to an end. They are described in Annex TC-8 to the Crude Oil Transportation Service Chapter, Annex DCC-6 to the Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service Chapter and Annex

 

50
 

 

 

CCP-9 to the Crude Oil Loading at Ports Chapter.

 

Ports: the set of physical elements that includes installations, access channels, facilities, and services which allow an area on the coast or a riverbank to be exploited under conditions favorable for the execution of loading and unloading operations of all manner of vessels and the exchange of assets with land, sea and/or river traffic. Port terminals, docks and piers are included within ports.

 

Port Operating Regulations: the document that regulates the relations between CENIT and the Shippers for the most advantageous, safest and timely provision of Port Services and the execution of the operations related thereto, approved by the Ministry of Transportation, along with its amendments and additions.

 

Port Services: means the support services required to attend to a tanker or vessel, carried out by port operators.

 

Pour Point: means the temperature at which Crude Oil ceases to flow.

 

Project Management Contract: the Contract through which CENIT shall assign project management.

 

Preferential Right: means the power of the National Government, exercised through the National Hydrocarbons Agency (ANH) or the entity appointed by it, over the Design Capacity of Pipelines for private use for the transportation of royalty Crude Oil. This preference is limited to the Crude Oil originating from the royalties from the production of the Owners or from the fields for which the pipeline was built. The Preferential Right shall be for up to twenty percent (20%) of the Design Capacity.

 

Provisional Notice: means the notice that CENIT shall make to ECOPETROL with regard to the damages or additional costs arising from non-compliance with ECOPETROL’s obligations, or regarding its intention to remove and dispose of ECOPETROL Crude Oil to pay sums owed to CENIT by ECOPETROL and/or to prevent operational interruptions in any of the Services.

 

Prudent Industry Practices: means the practices generally followed by an experienced and prudent operator and hydrocarbon transportation infrastructure maintenance entity in the United States of America, adapted for carrying out operations in Colombia, where necessary, due to weather, topographical, public order and socio-environmental conditions, as well as the known state of the Infrastructure.

 

 

51
 

 

Q

 

Quality Specifications: means the quality specifications that Crude Oil must meet for the performance of the Services, which are described in Annex TC-1 to the Crude Oil Transportation Service Chapter, Annex DCC-1 to the Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service Chapter, and Annex CCP-1 to the Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports Chapter.

 

 

R

 

Rate for Crude Oil Loading Services at Ports: means the monetary compensation that ECOPETROL must pay to CENIT for Crude Oil Loading Services at Ports.

 

Reasonable Effort: means the reasonable and timely measures to be taken by a comprehensive hydrocarbon logistics and transportation service provider, according to the demands of the profession and Prudent Industry Practices, in order to prevent a loss or its aggravation.

 

 

S

 

Scheduled Capacity: means the portion of the Pipeline’s Effective Transportation Capacity assigned to each Shipper or Third Party requesting Crude Oil Transportation Service in accordance with the provisions of the Transporter Manual.

 

For all other Services it means the portion of Effective Capacity assigned to each Shipper or Third Party requesting the respective service.

 

Segregated Crude Oil: means Crude Oil that, by agreement between CENIT and a Shipper, is to be transported through the Pipeline without being mixed with other Crude Oil.

 

For all other Services, it means Crude Oil that, by agreement between CENIT and a Shipper, is to be stored, unloaded, loaded into Tank Trucks or loaded at Ports without being mixed with other Crude Oil.

 

Services: refers jointly to the Crude Oil Transportation Service, the Crude Oil Storage Service, the Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service and the Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports as well as the Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service.

 

Service Factor: The percentage of the Nominal Capacity effectively usable due to temporary operating and maintenance restrictions of the Pipeline and its related and complementary facilities, calculated for a given period of time in which the effects of mechanical equipment not being available, line maintenance programs and the number of days of the period considered must be taken into account.

 

For all other Services it means the percentage of the Nominal Capacity effectively usable due to the temporary operating and maintenance restrictions of the Tanks, Unloading Platforms, Ports, Loading Platforms and their related and complementary facilities, calculated for a given period of time, in which the effects of mechanical equipment not being available, maintenance programs and the number of days of the period considered must be taken into account.

 

Service Rate: refers jointly to the Crude Oil Transportation Rate, Crude Oil Storage Rate, Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Rate, Rate for Crude Oil Loading at Ports, and the Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Rate.

 

Ship and Pay: means the modality under which part of the Firm Capacity is committed, and by virtue of which ECOPETROL is only required to pay a Service Rate for the volumes actually used within said capacity.

 

Ship or Pay: means the modality under which part of the Firm Capacity is committed, and by virtue of which ECOPETROL is required to pay a Service Rate for the committed volume, regardless of whether or not it actually uses said capacity.

 

Shipper: the party which contracts the service and signs an agreement for any of the Services with CENIT. It shall be understood that the Shipper acts as the owner of the Crude Oil to be transported, unloaded, stored, loaded at Ports and loaded into tank trucks unless specified to the contrary. The ANH is included among the Shippers.

 

Short Withdrawal: means the volume of Crude Oil that a Shipper has not withdrawn according to the Crude Oil Transportation Program.

 

Span: means the portion of the Pipeline between an Entry Hub and an Exit Hub, which must have a Crude Oil Transportation Rate.

 

 

T

 

Tanks: The set of assets used to store ECOPETROL Crude Oil.

 

Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Rate: means the monetary compensation that ECOPETROL must pay to CENIT for the Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service.

 

Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service: means the tank truck loading service for ECOPETROL Crude Oil to be provided to ECOPETROL by CENIT, the rules for which are included in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service Chapter (Chapter V), and its annexes.

 

52
 

 

Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Rate: means the monetary compensation that ECOPETROL must pay to CENIT for the Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service at the Unloading Platform.

 

Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service: means the tank truck unloading service to be provided to ECOPETROL by CENIT at the Unloading Platforms, the rules for which are included in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, Tank Truck Unloading Service Chapter (Chapter III), and its annexes.

 

Tanker Loading Units: the single-buoy moorings licensed to CENIT and located at the different Ports for loading tankers, or those which replace them.

 

Temporary Capacity Release: means the ECOPETROL Firm Capacity released temporarily according to the rules set out in Section 3.05 (i) of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Term of Suspension: means the period that commences on the date of the Notice of Suspension and ends on the date of the Notice of Resumption.

 

Term of Validity: It shall have the meaning assigned to it in Section 4.01 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Third Party: the person who owns or has possession of the Crude Oil and requests the provision of the service through a Pipeline from CENIT.

 

For the Caño Limón – Coveñas Pipeline, according to the Caño Limón – Coveñas Pipeline Transporter Manual for the Transportation Contract for Crude Oil Owned by OXY and entered into by and between ECOPETROL, Occidental de Colombia Inc. and Occidental de Andina Inc., it shall be understood as the person who owns or has possession of the Crude Oil and requests the provision of the service through a Pipeline from CENIT, conditioned upon the Available Capacity of CENIT Assets.

 

For the other Services, it means the person who owns or has possession of the Crude Oil and requests the provision of the Storage, Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading, Crude Oil Loading at Ports and Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading services from CENIT.

 

Followup Committee: means the committee formed to track the performance of this Master Service Contract according to the rules set out in Clause 9 of the General Conditions.

 

Transportation Contract: means the memorandum of understanding executed in writing between the Transporter and a Shipper, the purpose of which is or includes the transportation of Crude Oil by Pipeline.

 

 

For the purposes of this document, the Parties understand that the Transportation Contract includes the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract and Chapter I on the Transportation of ECOPETROL’s Crude Oil.

 

Transporter’s Manual: the document which contains information and CENIT’s operating and administrative procedures designed to regulate the operation of the system in accordance with Article 6 of Ministry of Mines and Energy Resolution 18 1258 of July 14, 2010. It is attached as Annex TC-3 and Annex TC-4 to the Crude Oil Transportation Service Chapter, as applicable in accordance with the provisions of Section 7.03 of Chapter I.

 

For the Caño Limón–Coveñas Pipeline, it is understood that it shall be governed by the Caño Limón – Coveñas Pipeline Transporter Manual for the Transportation Contract for Crude Oil Owned by OXY entered into by and between ECOPETROL and Occidental de Colombia Inc. and Occidental de Andina Inc. It is attached as Annex TC-5 to the Crude Oil Transportation Service Chapter.

 

Transportation Plan: means the projection of the volumes to be transported through the Pipeline and of Unused Capacity in the medium and long term.

 

For all other Services, it means the projection of volumes to be stored, unloaded, loaded at Ports and loaded into tank trucks and which are included in the Transportation Plan.

 

 

U

 

Unloading Platforms: all of the physical installations required for unloading Crude Oil under the Master Service Contract.

 

Unused Capacity: means the unused Effective Capacity, which consists of the sum of: (i) the Available Capacity of CENIT Assets, (ii) the Preferential Right not exercised by the National Hydrocarbons Agency (ANH) (scheduled but not used or nominated), (iii) the unused Owner’s Capacity and (iv) the unused Contracted Capacity (scheduled but not used or nominated).

 

 

V

 

Volume to be Transported: means the Gross Standard Barrels delivered by the Shipper to CENIT at the Entry Point.

 

Volumetric Balance: means the balance of the operations that CENIT shall carry out at the end of each Operating Month in order to establish the different amounts of Crude Oil handled in the Pipeline and to determine the amount and distribution of Crude Oil losses.

 

It also refers to the balance of the operations that CENIT shall carry out at the end of each Operating Month in order to establish the different amounts of Crude Oil handled in the Tank, Unloading Platform, Port and Loading Platform.

 

 

W

 

Water and Sediment: means all material that coexists with the Crude Oil without being part of it.

 

Withdrawal: means the act by which CENIT returns a volume of Crude Oil to the Shipper, or to the entity that it designates, at the Exit Point, bringing its custody to an end.

 

[SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

 

53
 

 

Contrato Marco de Servicios para Crudos
Capítulo IV – Servicio de Cargue de Crudos en
Puertos

 

Chapter I

Transportation of Crude Oil by Pipeline Service

 

In addition to the terms set forth in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, the Parties agree that the Transportation Service shall be governed by the following:

 

Clauses

 

Clause 1 Scope of the Service

 

Section 1.01      This Chapter and any annexes shall regulate the specific conditions for the provision of the Transportation Service for ECOPETROL Crude Oil, in accordance with the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

Section 1.02      Description of the Crude Oil Transportation Service. CENIT agrees to provide services to ECOPETROL, with respect to ECOPETROL Crude Oil that has been nominated and delivered within the Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL, including but not limited to those described below:

 

(i) Receive and accept the Nominations of ECOPETROL Crude Oil in accordance with ECOPETROL requirements and pursuant to the rules pertaining to the Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL.

 

(ii) Receive at each Entry Point the ECOPETROL Crude Oil that conforms to the Quality Specifications contained in Annex TC-1 of this Chapter on Crude Oil Transportation.

 

(iii) Transport, custody, storage and decant the ECOPETROL Crude Oil through each of the Pipelines listed in Annex TC-2 and to each Exit Point, in accordance with the Nominations made by ECOPETROL and accepted by CENIT.

 

(iv) Transport the Segregated Crude Oil in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in the CENIT Transporter Manual, including, but not limited to, the Segregated Crude Oil specified in Annex TC-10 .

 

(v) Make available to ECOPETROL, at each Exit Point, the ECOPETROL Crude Oil.

 

(vi) Carry out all activities related to Crude Oil Transportation Services in this Chapter, in coordination with other operators providing identical or similar services to CENIT and which are necessary in order to meet the disposal requirements for ECOPETROL Crude Oil.

 

Clause 2 Crude Oil Transportation Rate

 

(i) The Transportation Rates for ECOPETROL Crude Oil are listed in Annex TC-6 and are the Rates in effect for the year 2013.

 

54
 

 

Clause 3 Contractual Liability Limits of CENIT

 

For the purposes of the provisions of Section 16.02 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, in the event of loss of or damage to ECOPETROL Crude Oil during the Crude Oil Transportation Service, the following contractual liability limit shall apply:

 

(i) For actual damages, CENIT shall pay compensation equivalent to seventy-five percent (75%) of the Declared Value of the Crude Oil for each Barrel that is lost or damaged.

 

(ii) For lost profits, CENIT shall pay compensation equivalent to twenty-five percent (25%) of the Declared Value of the Crude Oil for each Barrel that is lost or damaged.

 

(iii) These compensation limits shall not be applicable to events of fraud or gross negligence on the part of CENIT.

 

Clause 4 Transportation Tax

 

(i) Payment of the transportation tax shall be made to the beneficiaries by CENIT in its capacity as transporter. Nevertheless, the amount determined pursuant to the legal procedure in force shall be assumed by ECOPETROL in its capacity as Shipper and paid to CENIT.

 

(ii) The transportation tax shall be billed separately on a quarterly basis within no more than fifteen (15) days from the close of the volumetric compensation for quality of the last month of the quarter, through issuance of an invoice or equivalent document in Colombian pesos to ECOPETROL, taking as a basis the net volumes to which the volumetric compensation for quality has not been applied.

 

(iii) ECOPETROL agrees to irrevocably pay the invoice or equivalent document in Colombian pesos within fifteen (15) days from the submission of invoices or billing statements by CENIT. Objections to the invoice shall not interrupt the time period for payment thereof. Delays in the payment of invoices shall generate default interest in accordance with Section 6.07 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

(vi) For the purposes of payment of the corresponding tax, the following shall be taken into account: (i) total net volumes transported; and (ii) the payment quarters shall be: January-March, April–June, July–September and October – December.

 

In addition to the above, for informational purposes, CENIT shall send on a monthly basis the estimated value of the transportation tax, by the last day of the following month at the latest.

 

(v) Adjustments to the invoice or equivalent document shall be made when: (i) adjustments have been made to the amount charged to the Shipper deriving from the payment received by the Ministry of Mines and Energy; (ii) adjustments have been made as a result of objections to invoices, in accordance with the procedure stipulated by the Parties. Such adjustments shall be acknowledged and compared by CENIT against the values established in the immediately following quarterly payment.

 

55
 

 

Clause 5 Measurement

 

Section 5.01 Transition Policy. The Parties agree that for the purposes of this Chapter, measurement shall be governed by the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual during the first year, commencing as of the Date of Signature. From that moment on, the measurement shall be governed by the CENIT Measurement Manual, which must ensure compliance with Prudent Industry Practices and in particular the API Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards.

 

ECOPETROL shall send to CENIT the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual within the first five (5) days immediately following the Date of Signature.

 

Section 5.02 The Parties agree that for the purposes of this Chapter, the dynamic measurement methodology shall be applied, in accordance with the Quality Specifications for Crude Oil and the Measurement Manual which has been incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TC-9 or the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual, as applicable, in accordance with Section 5.01 of this Chapter.

 

Section 5.03 CENIT agrees to have dynamic measurement devices on hand at the Entry Points and Exit Points of the Products throughout the validity period of the Master Service Contract.

 

Section 5.04 Backup Measurement. Notwithstanding the obligation of CENIT set forth in Section 5.02 of this Chapter, in cases where for whatever reason it is not possible to apply the dynamic measurement methodology, the Parties agree that the static measurement methodology shall be applied according to the Quality Specifications for Crude Oil and the Measurement Manual incorporated herein as Annex TC-9 of the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual, as applicable, in conformity with Section 5.01 of this Chapter.

 

Section 5.05 Any disputes that may arise between the Parties in connection with dynamic measurement or static measurement shall be resolved in accordance with the procedures established in Clauses 23, 24 and 25 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 6 Procedures and Regulations applicable to the Transportation Service

 

The procedures and regulations set forth below, attached hereto and which form an integral part of this Master Service Contract as an Annex, are the rules that govern the operating conditions and Transportation Service for ECOPETROL Crude Oil. The provisions contained in the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract and in this Chapter shall prevail with respect to the conditions established in the Annexes to this Chapter. The procedures and rules are as follows:

 

56
 

 

  (i) Quality Specifications , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TC-1 .

 

(ii) Pipelines , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TC-2.

 

(iii) CENIT Transporter Manual , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TC-3 .

 

(iv) ECOPETROL Transporter Manual , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TC-4 .

 

(v) Caño Limón-Coveñas Pipeline Transporter Manual , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TC-5 .

 

(vi) Crude Oil Transportation Rates for each Pipeline , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TC-6 .

 

(vii) Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL for each Pipeline , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TC-7 .

 

(viii) Pipeline Entry and Exit Points , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TC-8 .

 

(ix) CENIT Measurement Manual , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TC-9 .

 

(x) Segregated Crude Oil by Pipeline , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TC-10 .

 

Clause 7 Specific Provisions

 

Section 7.01 CENIT Transporter Manual and Master Service Contract. Once the CENIT Transporter Manual, or any changes thereto made during the term of the Master Service Contract, have been published and sent to the Ministry of Mines and Energy or to the entity acting in its stead, the Parties shall review the impact thereof on the Master Service Contract and make the corresponding changes allowable under applicable regulations.

 

Section 7.02 With respect to the provisions set forth in the CENIT Transporter Manual, the Parties specifically agree as follows:

 

(i) The obligations stipulated in the CENIT Transporter Manual, as they relate to the information necessary for drafting the transportation plans and the Transportation Program, shall only be binding on ECOPETROL as of the Commencement Date.

 

(ii) This Chapter and all other provisions that govern the Transportation Service under the Master Service Contract shall be understood to be the Transportation Contract.

 

57
 

 

(iii) For the purposes of applying the terms of the CENIT Transporter Manual, the Contracted Capacity of ECOPETROL under this Master Service Contract shall be understood to mean the Firm Contracted Capacity.

 

(iv) Within a maximum of two (2) months from the Date of Signature, CENIT shall notify ECOPETROL, for its respective review and approval, of the following:

 

(a) The Volumetric Balance existing as of the Commencement Date.

 

(b) Line Fill data, so that CENIT may make the corresponding adjustments as of the Commencement Date.

 

(v) ECOPETROL shall not be required to pay a fee in addition to the Transportation Rate for Segregated Crude Oil Transportation Services that have been included in Annex TC-10 .

 

Pursuant to the pertinent provisions of the CENIT Transporter Manual with respect to the obligation to assume additional costs for such services, additional costs shall only be applicable for new agreements entered into by the Parties after the Date of Signature and for Crude Oil not expressly included in Annex TC-10 .

 

(vi) For the purpose of the provisions of the CENIT Transporter Manual regarding Hydrocarbon Quality certifications, CENIT shall accept as valid existing certifications and all other information submitted to it by ECOPETROL as of the Commencement Date. Therefore, ECOPETROL shall only be required to renew such certifications on an annual basis as of the First (1 st ) day of January of 2014.

 

(vii) At the request of ECOPETROL, the Parties may define the terms and conditions for the provision of ECOPETROL Crude Oil Transportation Services bidirectionally via the Pipelines.

 

Section 7.03 Transition Policy. The Parties agree that the Transportation Manual in

 

effect as of the Date of Signature shall be applicable for Pipelines until the date of publication of the CENIT Transporter Manual and remittance thereof to the Ministry of Mines and Energy or the entity acting in its stead.

 

[ SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ]

 

58
 

 

Chapter II

Crude Oil Storage Service

 

In addition to the terms set forth in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, the Parties agree that the Storage Service shall be governed by the following:

 

Clauses

 

Clause 1 Scope of the Service

 

Section 1.01 This Chapter and any Annexes agreed to by the Parties shall regulate the specific conditions for the provision of the Storage Service for ECOPETROL Crude Oil, in accordance with the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

Section 1.02 Description of the Service

 

(i) CENIT agrees to provide services to ECOPETROL, with respect to ECOPETROL Crude Oil, including but not limited to those described below:

 

(a) Receive the ECOPETROL Crude Oil to be stored for up to the Contracted Storage Capacity at the Entry Point.

 

(b) Storage, custody and preservation of ECOPETROL Crude Oil.

 

(c) Deliver to ECOPETROL or to the party indicated by the latter the ECOPETROL Crude Oil at the Exit Point.

 

(ii) The Crude Oil Storage Service referred to in this Chapter is a service in addition to the storage activities required in order to ensure the provision of the Crude Oil Transportation Services, Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading, Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading and Crude Oil Loading at Ports, which services are listed under the corresponding Rate Schedule.

 

Clause 2 Contracted Capacity for Storage Service

 

(i) As at the Date of Signature of this Master Service Contract there is no Firm Contracted Capacity for the Crude Oil Storage Service provided to ECOPETROL.

 

(ii) As a result of the above, any requirements that ECOPETROL may have for the Crude Oil Storage Service must be agreed upon by the Parties pursuant to the rules for Additional Capacity established in Section 3.06 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

59
 

 

Clause 3 Procedures and Regulations applicable to the Crude Oil Storage Service

 

The procedures and regulations applicable to the Crude Oil Storage Service shall be those agreed upon by the Parties from time to time, taking into account CENIT’S obligations as custodian.

 

[ SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ]

 

60
 

 

Chapter III

Service: Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading

 

In addition to the terms set forth in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, the Parties agree that the Unloading Service shall be governed by the following:

 

Clauses

 

Clause 1 Scope of the Service

 

Section 1.01 This Chapter and its Annexes regulate the specific conditions for the provision of the Unloading Service for ECOPETROL Crude Oil pursuant to the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

Section 1.02 Description of the Service. CENIT agrees to provide services to ECOPETROL, with respect to the ECOPETROL Crude Oil that is nominated and delivered under the Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL, including but not limited to those described below:

 

(i) Receive and accept the Nominations of ECOPETROL Crude Oil, in accordance with the requirements of ECOPETROL and pursuant to the rules applicable to the Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL.

 

(ii) Receive at each Point of Entry the ECOPETROL Crude Oil that meets the requirements of the Quality Specifications set forth in Annex DCC-1 of this Chapter on Unloading of Crude Oil from Tank Trucks.

 

(iii) Custody, storage and decant the ECOPETROL Crude Oil at each of the Unloading Platforms listed in Annex DCC-2 and to each Exit Point, in accordance with the Nominations made by ECOPETROL and accepted by CENIT.

 

(iv) Handle the Crude Oil in accordance with the agreements to be made by the Parties for the transportation of Segregated Crude Oil, including, but not limited to, the Segregated Crude Oil specified in Annex TC-10 .

 

(v) Make available to ECOPETROL, at each Exit Point, the ECOPETROL Crude Oil received by CENIT at the corresponding Unloading Platform.

 

(vi) Carry out all activities related to the Services under this Master Service Contract, in coordination with other operators providing identical or similar services to CENIT and which are necessary in order to meet the disposal requirements for ECOPETROL Crude Oil.

 

61
 

 

Section 1.03 The Service for Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading referred to in this Chapter is a service in addition to the unloading activities required in order to ensure the provision of the Crude Oil Transportation Services, Crude Oil Storage, Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading, and Crude Oil Loading at Ports, which services are listed under the corresponding Rate Schedule.

 

Clause 2 Crude Oil Unloading Rate

 

(i) The Unloading Rates for ECOPETROL Crude Oil are those listed in Annex DCC-3 and are the Rates in effect for the year 2013.

 

Clause 3 Contractual Liability Limits of CENIT

 

For the purposes of the provisions of Section 16.02 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, in the event of loss of or damage to ECOPETROL Crude Oil during the Tank Truck Crude Oil Unloading Service, the following contractual liability limit shall apply:

 

(i) For actual damages, CENIT shall pay compensation equivalent to seventy-five percent (75%) of the Declared Value of the Crude Oil for each Barrel that is lost or damaged.

 

(ii) For lost profits, CENIT shall pay compensation equivalent to twenty-five percent (25%) of the Declared Value of the Crude Oil for each Barrel that is lost or damaged.

 

(iii) These compensation limits shall not be applicable to events of fraud or gross negligence on the part of CENIT.

 

Clause 4 Measurement

 

Section 4.01 Transition Policy . The Parties agree that for the purposes of this Chapter, measurement shall be governed by the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual during the first year, commencing as of the Date of Signature. From that moment on, the measurement shall be governed by the CENIT Measurement Manual, which must ensure compliance with Prudent Industry Practices and in particular the API Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards.

 

ECOPETROL shall send to CENIT the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual within the first five (5) days immediately following the Date of Signature.

 

Section 4.02 The Parties agree that for the purposes of this Chapter, the dynamic measurement methodology shall be applied, in accordance with the Quality Specifications for Crude Oil and the Measurement Manual, which has been incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex DCC-7 or the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual, as applicable, in accordance with Section 4.01 of this Chapter.

 

62
 

 

Section 4.03 CENIT agrees to have dynamic measurement devices on hand at the entry Points and exit Points throughout the validity period of this Master Service Contract.

 

Section 4.04 Backup Measurement. Without prejudice to the obligation of CENIT set forth in Section 4.02 of this Chapter, in cases where for whatever reason it is not possible to apply the dynamic measurement methodology, the Parties agree that the static measurement methodology shall be applied according to the Quality Specifications for Crude Oil and the Measurement Manual incorporated herein as Annex DCC-7 or the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual, as applicable, in conformity with Section 4.01 of this Chapter.

 

Section 4.05 Any disputes that may arise between the Parties in connection with dynamic measurement or static measurement shall be resolved in accordance with the procedures established in Clauses 23, 24 and 25 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 5 Procedures and Regulations applicable to the Unloading Service

 

The procedures and regulations set forth below, attached hereto and which form an integral part of this Master Service Contract as an Annex, are the rules that govern the operating conditions and Unloading of ECOPETROL Crude Oil. The procedures and rules are as follows:

 

(i) Crude Oil Quality Specifications , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex DCC-1 .

 

(ii) Unloading Platforms , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex DCC-2 .

 

(iii) Crude Oil Unloading Rates , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex DCC-3 .

 

(iv) Operating and Unloading Standards , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex DCC-4 .

 

(v) Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL for each Unloading Platform , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex DCC-5 .

 

(vi) Unloading Platform Entry and Exit Points , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex DCC-6 .

 

(vii) CENIT Measurement Manual , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex DCC-7 .

 

[ SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ]

 

63
 

 

Chapter IV

Crude Oil loading at ports

 

In addition to the terms set forth in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, the Parties agree that the Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports shall be governed by the following,

 

Clauses

 

Clause 1 Scope of the Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports

 

Section 1.01 This Chapter and its Annexes regulate the specific conditions for the provision of the Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports for ECOPETROL Crude Oil pursuant to the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

Section 1.02 Description of the Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports. CENIT agrees to provide to ECOPETROL services including but not limited to those listed below, with respect to the ECOPETROL Crude Oil that is delivered by ECOPETROL and received by CENIT:

 

(i) Receive the ECOPETROL Crude Oil that arrives at the Ports through the Pipelines. Similarly, receive the ECOPETROL Crude Oil that arrives at the Ports through any other means, provided that the infrastructure required for receipt thereof is installed.

 

(ii) Necessary storage of ECOPETROL Crude Oil.

 

(iii) Ensure the quality of ECOPETROL Crude Oil in accordance with the specifications agreed by the Parties, the provisions of this Chapter and Annex CCP-10 .

 

(iv) Handle, pump, decant and load onto tankers for export or coastal shipping at the Ports specified in Annex CCP-1 ECOPETROL Crude Oil within the Contracted Capacity.

 

(v) Schedule timeframes at the Tank Loading Units.

 

(vi) Port Services for tankers arriving at the Ports.

 

Clause 2            Service Conditions

 

(i) The effective provision of the Crude Oil Loading Service at Ports discussed in this Chapter shall be subject to:
64
 

 

Contrato Marco de Servicios para Crudos

Capítulo V – Servicio de Cargue de Crudos en
Carrotanques

 

(a) Approval by the respective authority of the transfer of the respective concession contracts or of equivalent rights, whichever is applicable to CENIT, with respect to the Ports discussed in Annex CCP-1 .

 

(b) CENIT obtaining the respective licenses, permits and authorizations to act as concessionaire.

 

(ii) During such time as the port concessions overseen by CENIT are operating under the private port system, and if for any reason a competent authority were to modify the interpretation of the concept of “Legally and Economically Bound Party” referred to in Law 1 of 1991, thereby affecting the ECOPETROL’S rights to access the Ports contracted pursuant to this Chapter, CENIT shall be required to promptly modify the port concession contracts in order to guarantee the Services under such contracts.

 

(iii)      Unless expressly agreed otherwise between the Parties, any modification to the concession contracts or to the Port authorization terms shall not result in a modification to the access rights and terms in favor of ECOPETROL set forth in this Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 3       Service Rate for Crude Oil Loading at Ports

 

(i) The Service Rates for Loading Crude Oil at Ports are the rates set forth in Annex CCP-2 and are the rates in effect for the year 2013.

 

(ii) Rates for Port Services shall be billed according to Port Operating Regulations.

 

Clause 4       Contractual Liability Limits of CENIT

 

For the purposes of the provisions of Section 16.02 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, in the event of loss of or damage to ECOPETROL Crude Oil during the Loading of Crude Oil at Ports Service, the following contractual liability limit shall apply:

 

(i) For actual damages, CENIT shall pay compensation equivalent to seventy-five percent (75%) of the Declared Value of the Crude Oil for each Barrel that is lost or damaged.

 

(ii) For lost profits, CENIT shall pay compensation equivalent to twenty-five percent (25%) of the Declared Value of the Crude Oil for each Barrel that is lost or damaged.

 

(iii) These compensation limits shall not be applicable to events of fraud or gross negligence on the part of CENIT.

 

65
 

 

Contrato Marco de Servicios para Crudos

Capítulo V – Servicio de Cargue de Crudos en
Carrotanques

 

Clause 5 Procedures and Regulations applicable to the Crude Oil Loading at Ports Service

 

Section 5.01 The procedures and regulations set forth below, attached hereto and which form an integral part of this Master Service Contract as an Annex, are the rules that govern the operating conditions and Port service. The procedures and rules include, but are not limited to:

 

(i) Ports , which forms part of this Master Service Contract as Annex CCP-1 .

 

(ii) Rates for Crude Oil Loading Services at Ports , which forms part of this Master Service Contract as Annex CCP-2 .

 

(iii) Crude Oil Removal Procedure , which forms part of this Master Service Contract as Annex CCP-3 .

 

(iv) Port Operations Regulations, which form part of this Master Service Contract as Annex CCP-4.

 

(v) CENIT Measurement Manual , which forms part of this Master Service Contract as Annex CCP-5 .

 

(vi) Procedure for Resolving Delays , which forms part of this Master Service Contract as Annex CCP-6 .

 

(vii) Capacity Contracted by ECOPETROL at Ports , which forms part of this Master Service Contract as Annex CCP-7 .

 

(viii) Port Entry and Exit Points , which forms part of this Master Service Contract as Annex CCP-8 .

 

(ix) Procedure for Scheduling Windows , which forms part of this Master Service Contract as Annex CCP-9 .

 

(x) Crude Oil Quality Specifications for Loading at Ports , which forms part of this Master Service Contract as Annex CCP-10 .

 

(xi) MARPOL : International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, published in London on November 2, 1973 and approved by the Colombian Congress through Law 12 of 1981, its amendments and additions, which forms part of this Master Service Contract as Annex CCP-11 .

 

Section 5.02 Considering that as of the Date of Signature CENIT is not the owner of the port concessions that have currently been awarded to ECOPETROL, the Parties agree to execute the Annexes listed in this Master Service Contract within a period not to exceed six (6) months from the Date of Signature hereof.

 

Section 5.03 Notwithstanding the foregoing, and in the event that the transfer of the port concessions by ECOPETROL to CENIT is realized, the Parties shall review the Annexes listed in this Chapter within a period of two (2) months from the assignment date of the port concessions and shall make any necessary changes.

 

66
 

 

Contrato Marco de Servicios para Crudos

Capítulo V – Servicio de Cargue de Crudos en
Carrotanques

 

[ SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ]

 

67
 

 

Contrato Marco de Servicios para Crudos

Capítulo V – Servicio de Cargue de Crudos en
Carrotanques

 

Chapter V

Service: Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading

 

In addition to the terms set forth in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, the Parties agree that the Loading of Crude Oil onto ECOPETROL Tank Trucks shall be governed by the following,

 

Clauses

 

Clause 1 Scope of the Service

 

Section 1.01 This Chapter and any Annexes that may be executed by the Parties in the future regulate the specific conditions for the provision of the Service for Loading ECOPETROL Crude Oil onto Tank Trucks pursuant to the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

Section 1.02 Description of the Service. CENIT agrees to provide to ECOPETROL, with respect to ECOPETROL Crude Oil, services including but not limited to those listed below:

 

(i) Make available to ECOPETROL, at each Exit Point, the ECOPETROL Crude Oil;

 

(ii) Perform the loading of ECOPETROL Crude Oil into Tank Trucks at each Exit Point.

 

Clause 2 Contracted Capacity for Loading Crude Oil onto Tank Trucks

 

(i) As of the Date of Signature of this Master Service Contract, there is no Contracted Capacity for the Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service for ECOPETROL.

 

(ii) As a result of the above, any requirements ECOPETROL may have for the Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service must be agreed upon by the Parties pursuant to the rules for Additional Capacity established in Section 3.06 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 3 Procedures and Regulations applicable to the Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service

 

The procedures and regulations applicable to the Tank Truck Crude Oil Loading Service shall be those that may be agreed upon by the Parties from time to time. The provisions contained in the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract and in this Chapter shall prevail with respect to the conditions established in the Annexes to this Chapter.

 

[ SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

 

68

 

 

Exhibit 4.7

 

  Master Service Contract for Products
General Conditions
 

 

Master Service Contract for Products

 

This agreement (hereafter the “ Master Service Contract ”) for the transportation of products, storage of products, loading of Products into Tank Trucks and unloading of products in ports for “ ECOPETROL Products” (term defined in Clause 33 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract), is signed April 1, 2013 (hereafter the “ Date of Signature ”), by and between,

 

1. CENIT TRANSPORTE Y LOGÍSTICA DE HIDROCARBUROS S.A.S. , a Colombian commercial corporation and type of simplified joint stock company, domiciled in Bogota, D.C., incorporated through a private document dated June fifteenth (15 th ), 2012, registered in the commercial registry on June fifteenth (15 th ), 2012, with commercial registration number 02224959, represented for the purpose of entering into this Master Service Contract by Camilo Marulanda López , identified by the title below his signature, authorized for such purposes by the Board of Directors as provided for under Meeting Minutes No. 8 of February twenty-first (21 st ), 2013 (hereafter “ CENIT ”); and

 

2. ECOPETROL S.A. , a mixed economy company linked to the Ministry of Energy and Mines, with its principal domicile in Bogota, Capital District, with Tax Identification Number 899.999.068-1, represented for the purpose of entering into this Master Service Contract by Javier Genaro Gutierrez Pemberthy , identified by the title below his signature, acting in his capacity as President, with authority to sign this Master Service Contract as provided for under the Manual for Delegation of Authority for ECOPETROL S.A. (hereafter, “ ECOPETROL ”).

 

Based on the foregoing conditions, CENIT and ECOPETROL (together the “ Parties ” and, individually, a “ Party ” or the “ Party ”), hereby affirm that they have entered into this Master Service Contract, taking into account the following

 

Recitals

 

1. ECOPETROL engages in activities related to the exploration, production, refining and transport of hydrocarbons, which are characterized as public utilities in accordance with the provisions set forth in Article 4 of the Petroleum Code.

 

2. ECOPETROL, prior to the Date of Signature, had infrastructure, either owned by it or held under a concession, for the loading, transport and storage of Products.

 

3. ECOPETROL, likewise (i) subject to available capacity for the assets referred to in the previous article and (ii) pursuant to authorizations under the law or current concession contracts, had been providing, prior to the Date of Signature, transportation, storage and loading services for Products owned by third parties.

 

1
 

 

4. ECOPETROL, individually, currently has in concession and/or under a licensing regime, private service port infrastructure, for exclusive use by it and its legal and financial entities, as provided for under law.

 

5. By virtue of the authorization contained in Decree 1320 of 2012, ECOPETROL formed the corporation CENIT as a subsidiary of ECOPETROL, specializing in providing transportation, storage and logistics services for hydrocarbons, derivatives, products and related items in Colombia or abroad.

 

6. ECOPETROL (i) as part of the formation and effective start-up of CENIT and (ii) in its capacity as CENIT’s sole partner, carried out through an Asset Contribution Contract (a defined term in Clause 3 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract) (a) the contribution of assets associated with the transportation of Products owned by ECOPETROL (hereafter the “ Assets ”) and (b) committed to undertake the processes aimed at the assignment of port concession contracts related to the import and export of Crude and its Products to CENIT, under the terms as determined and approved by the Competent Authority.

 

7. In accordance with the provisions of ECOPETROL’s Procurement Manual, the entering into of this Master Service Contract is derived from a direct procurement process based on the following specific and special conditions of CENIT: (i) to be the beneficiary of the transfer of the Assets, according to provisions in the foregoing recitals and (ii) be the sole provider of the Services that are contemplated by this Master Service Contract, through Assets contributed by ECOPETROL.

 

8. This Master Service Contract shall establish the terms under which ECOPETROL will contract capacity for the Assets, taking into account ECOPETROL’s status as a petroleum exploration, production and refining company, pursuant to the provisions of Article 45 of the Petroleum Code.

 

9. The Parties, through agreements separate from this Master Service Contract, defined the terms and conditions under which ECOPETROL committed to assign to CENIT the rights and obligations in force as of the date of transfer of the Assets, particularly with relation to services provided to third parties, binational agreements, operating agreements and financial and social commitments associated with them.

 

10. CENIT is in compliance with its obligations concerning systems for health, professional risk, pension and contributions to Family Compensation Funds, the Colombian Institute of Family Welfare and the National Learning Service, with regard to all of its employees in Colombia. To confirm this, it provided ECOPETROL with a certificate attesting to the foregoing, issued by CENIT’s internal auditor.

 

11. CENIT is not listed in the Fiscal Debtor Bulletin prepared by the Colombian National Comptroller’s Office as an entity that has received a final tax liability decision and failed to comply with the obligation therein.

 

Based on the foregoing recitals, the Parties have agreed to enter into this Master Service Contract, which shall be subject to the following

 

2
 

 

General Conditions

 

Clause 1 Interpretation

 

Section 1.01 Interpretation

All capitalized terms in this Master Service Contract shall have the meaning indicated in Clause 32 of the General Conditions, or as expressly set forth herein. Definitions shall apply to the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, its Chapters and Chapter annexes, as well as to any supplementary agreement signed, except where otherwise provided. The meanings set forth for defined terms herein shall be applicable both for singular and plural forms, and feminine, masculine or gender-neutral defined terms shall include all other genders.

 

Section 1.02 Interpretation Criteria

In the event there is a contradiction between the provisions contained in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, its Chapters and annexes hereof, in accordance with the Service in question, the order of prevalence regarding its interpretation shall be as follows:

 

(i) Chapters excluding their annexes.

 

(ii) Clauses of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, excluding their annexes.

 

(iii) Annexes.

 

Clause 2 Object

 

Section 2.01

The object of this Master Service Contract is to regulate the comprehensive provision of Services by CENIT to ECOPETROL, with respect to ECOPETROL Products. CENIT shall provide Services with full technical, financial and administrative autonomy in exchange for payment of Rates by ECOPETROL and in accordance with the Service provided.

 

Notwithstanding the provisions of this Master Service Contract, the scope, terms and specific conditions for the provision of each of the contracted Services are regulated in Chapters I, II, III and IV.

 

Section 2.02

In order to ensure the comprehensive provision of Services contemplated herein for ECOPETROL, CENIT may utilize at its discretion:

 

(i) The Assets listed in the descriptive annexes corresponding to each of the Chapters I, II, III and IV of this Master Service Contract, or

 

3
 

 

(ii) All additional or supplementary infrastructure that is developed, acquired, transferred, leased and/or that CENIT has available following the Date of Signature hereof, that is related to and/or incidental to the Assets referenced in (i) above and that is necessary or advisable to ensure the provision of the Services contemplated in this Master Service Contract. The Parties understand that the infrastructure referred to in this sub-paragraph shall not include the infrastructure referenced in Section 2.03 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Section 2.03

This Master Service Contract may include the provision of Services regarding:

 

(i) All infrastructure that following the execution of this Master Service Contract is acquired by and/or becomes available to CENIT, and that:

 

(a) Is not listed in the annexes for Chapters I, II, III and IV of this Master Service Contract, and,

 

(b) Is not necessary or advisable to ensure the provision of the Services contemplated in this Master Service Contract. With respect to such infrastructure, CENIT agrees to offer access to such infrastructure to ECOPETROL, under identical conditions as would be offered to any other CENIT client, per the terms as set forth in the regulation, as applicable, except in the case of business transactions tailored to meet the particular requirements of a third party.

 

(ii) All infrastructure that following the execution of this Master Service Contract is assigned to CENIT in its capacity as concessionaire and that:

 

(a) Is not included in the annexes for Chapters I, II, III and IV of this Master Service Contract, and,

 

(b) Is not necessary or advisable to ensure the provision of the Services contemplated in this Master Service Contract. With respect to this, CENIT agrees to provide access to such infrastructure to ECOPETROL, under identical conditions as would be offered to any other CENIT client, per the terms as set forth in the regulation, as applicable, except in the case of business transactions tailored to meet the particular requirements of a third party.

 

In each specific instance, CENIT and ECOPETROL shall define the terms under which the respective services shall be included in this Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 3 ECOPETROL’s Contracted Capacity

 

Section 3.01

For the comprehensive provision of Services, CENIT agrees to guarantee for ECOPETROL the Firm Capacity for transportation, storage and loading of ECOPETROL Products under the terms set forth in Section 3.03.

 

4
 

 

Section 3.02

Notwithstanding the special considerations provided for in Chapters I, II, III and IV of this Master Service Contract, ECOPETROL’s Contracted Capacity shall include the modality of Firm Capacity and Additional Capacity.

 

Section 3.03

Notwithstanding the provisions in Sections 3.04, 3.05, and 3.07, CENIT warrants to ECOPETROL that for the effective term of the Master Service Contract, it shall maintain availability of its Firm Capacity for each Asset at an amount that is no less than the figure resulting from the following formula:

 

Minimum Availability of Firm Capacity = 0.9 x FC x (365 – S)

 

Where,

 

· FC is the Firm Capacity for each Asset; and
· S is the number of Days the applicable Service will be suspended due to a Justified Event.

 

Such verification will be carried out on an annual basis. Only during 2013, the Minimum Firm Capacity Available for each Asset shall be calculated using the following formula:

 

Minimum Firm Capacity Available = 0.9 x FC x (270 – S)

 

Section 3.04 Firm Capacity

 

(i) Upon execution of this Master Service Contract, ECOPETROL shall have a Firm Capacity for each of the Assets, as specified in the annexes to Chapters I, II, III and IV of this Master Service Contract.

 

(ii) With respect to Firm Capacity:

 

(a) As specified in the annexes to Chapters I, II, III, IV and V of this Master Service Contract, ECOPETROL shall have a portion of such capacity under the “Ship or Pay” modality, pursuant to the definition contained in Clause 32 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

(b) As specified in the annexes to Chapters I, II, III, IV and V of this Master Service Contract, ECOPETROL shall have a portion of such capacity under the “Ship and Pay” modality, pursuant to the definition contained in Clause 32 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

(c) As a result of the provisions set forth in sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) above:

 

1. The sum total of contracted capacities under the “Ship or Pay” and “Ship and Pay” modalities amounts to one hundred percent (100%) of the Firm Capacity contracted by ECOPETROL.

 

5
 

 

2. Firm Capacity contracted under the “Ship or Pay” modality and Firm Capacity contracted under the “Ship and Pay” modality shall comprise percentages of the total Firm Capacity, based on the specifications in the annexes to the respective Chapters of this Master Service Contract. As of the Date of Signature, such percentages equal seventy-seven percent (77%) for the “Ship or Pay” modality and twenty-three percent (23%) for the “Ship and Pay” modality. In the case of the Transportation of Products for the contingency situations specified in Section 1.02 (iii) in Chapter 1 and in Tank Truck Product Loading Service specified in Section 1.01 (i) of Chapter III, the payment modality shall be “Ship and Pay,” provided that it deals with transactions for replacement and rotation of Strategic Inventory.

 

Section 3.05 Specific rights concerning Firm Capacity

ECOPETROL shall be entitled to release and/or assign in whole or in part the Firm Capacity, based on the rules set forth below:

 

(i) Temporary Firm Capacity Release under “Ship or Pay” modality:

 

(a) ECOPETROL may at any point make the Firm Capacity under the “Ship or Pay” modality available to CENIT, either fully or in part, on a temporary basis.

 

It shall be understood that ECOPETROL releases such capacity in the following situations:

 

1. When ECOPETROL notifies CENIT by any means of the volumes it releases and the time for which the capacity release will be effective.

 

2. When ECOPETROL fails to nominate volumes within the Firm Capacity, in which case the release time shall be understood to be the respective Operational Month;

 

3. When ECOPETROL fails to use all or part of its Scheduled Capacity, in which case the release time shall be understood to be the respective Day.

 

(b) For Temporary Capacity Release the Parties shall agree on the procedure for ensuring its marketing. However, CENIT shall always have the first opportunity to market the Temporary Capacity Release, for which it shall put forth its best efforts during the time agreed upon by the Parties for each situation.

 

6
 

 

(c) It is understood that CENIT shall offer the Temporary Capacity Release to third parties at such time as CENIT’s Available Asset Capacity is exhausted.

 

(d) ECOPETROL shall not be required to pay the Service Rate with regard to any Temporary Capacity Release that CENIT or ECOPETROL successfully markets to a third party.

 

(e) ECOPETROL shall pay a Service Rate on the Temporary Capacity Release when CENIT or ECOPETROL are unable to market such Temporary Capacity Release.

 

(f) With regard to ECOPETROL’s Temporary Capacity Releases which CENIT successfully markets, ECOPETROL shall remit to CENIT a Marketing Rate to be agreed by the Parties and shall not be required to pay any additional Rate. In any event, the amount of the Marketing Rate agreed by the Parties shall not be greater than:

 

1. For released and marketed capacities of up to twenty thousand (20,000 BPCD) Barrels per Calendar Day, the Marketing Rate shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the Service Rate corresponding to the Asset(s) subject to temporary release by ECOPETROL.

 

2. For released and marketed capacities in excess of twenty thousand (20,000 BPCD), the Marketing Rate shall not exceed seven percent (7%) of the Service Rate corresponding to the Asset(s) subject to temporary release by ECOPETROL.

 

(g) CENIT shall not be required to accept nominations from ECOPETROL with respect to the Temporary Capacity Release, except in the event that it has not successfully marketed such Temporary Capacity Release.

 

(h) In those cases where various users release capacity for the respective Asset and CENIT markets a portion of such Temporary Capacity Release, for purposes of applying the rules set forth in letters (c) and (e) above, the capacity that CENIT successfully markets shall be distributed in proportion to the Temporary Capacity Release among those shippers that have temporarily released capacity.

 

(i) The release of capacity does not involve contractual modification of the Firm Capacity under the ECOPETROL’s “Ship or Pay” modality.

 

(ii) Permanent Firm Capacity Release under the “Ship or Pay” modality:

 

(a) Within the first ten (10) Calendar Years of the Completion Period of the Master Service Contract, ECOPETROL may permanently make available to CENIT all or part of the Firm Capacity contracted under the “Ship or Pay” modality, except the Firm Capacity under the “Ship or Pay” modality contracted with ECOPETROL for infrastructure for which CENIT has had to make investments corresponding to the projects that are ongoing as of the Date of Signature, listed in Annex TP-5 for Chapter 1 – Product Transport Service by Polyduct.

 

7
 

 

(b) For purposes of the Permanent Capacity Release, ECOPETROL may at any time notify CENIT, and by any written means, of the volumes it is releasing of the respective Firm Capacity under the “Ship or Pay” modality and the Asset to which such Permanent Capacity Release applies. The Permanent Capacity Release shall be effective as of the first (1 st ) Day of the third (3 rd ) month following the date of notification of such permanent release; as of such date, CENIT’s obligation to guarantee the availability of the Permanent Capacity Release shall terminate.

 

(c) Following the first ten (10) Calendar Years of the Completion Period of the Master Service Contract, ECOPETROL may permanently make available to CENIT, at any time, all or part of the Firm Capacity under the “Ship or Pay” modality, provided CENIT has given its express written consent. If it has done so, the capacity release shall only modify the Firm Capacity when expressly accepted by CENIT in a written document.

 

(d) ECOPETROL shall not be required to pay any Rate with regard to Permanent Capacity Release.

 

(e) The Capacity Release shall be deducted from the Firm Capacity, in the same proportion of “Ship or Pay” and “Ship and Pay” that is set forth in this contract. 

 

(iii) Assignment of rights to Firm Capacity:

 

(a) ECOPETROL may temporarily or permanently assign all or a portion of its contractual rights to the Firm Capacity agreed in this Master Service Contract without such situation implying marketing of the Firm Capacity.

 

(b) Should ECOPETROL exercise the option mentioned in the previous sub-paragraph, the following aspects must be taken into account:

 

1. ECOPETROL must inform CENIT of the volume of the capacity assigned to a third party, as well as of the effective time of the assignment for situations involving temporary assignment.

 

2. CENIT shall have a period of fifteen (15) Days to inform ECOPETROL of any objection it may have regarding any third party assignee. CENIT may not object to the assignment in situations where the third party assignee meets the following conditions:

 

A. The assignee is a duly incorporated legal entity whose period of duration is at least equal to that of the assignment period, plus three (3) Calendar Years;

 

8
 

 

B. The assignee has the financial capacity to satisfy the assigned obligations;

 

C. The assignee grants to CENIT, if it so requests, an adequate guarantee and to the satisfaction of CENIT with respect to the obligations acquired;

 

D. The assignee is not authorized to, in turn, assign such rights to a third party, except where previously approved by CENIT;

 

E. CENIT is authorized under legal and regulatory provisions to contract with the assignee;

 

F. The assignee enters into the respective contract with CENIT for the provision of services related to the Firm Capacity that is being assigned to it. The conditions of the contract shall be those normally established by CENIT for its clients.

 

G. The assignment of the Firm Capacity does not constitute marketing thereof.

 

H. The assignee satisfies the provisions concerning prevention and control of asset laundering and terrorism financing (LAFT).

 

3. In the event the assignment is not able to satisfy all of the foregoing requirements, CENIT shall not be required to accept the assignment proposed by ECOPETROL.

 

4. The assignment of rights carried out by ECOPETROL and to which CENIT does not object, shall be fully binding and obligatory for CENIT.

 

5. ECOPETROL shall not be jointly liable with the assignee regarding the obligations under its responsibility that are derived as a result of the assignment of Firm Capacity.

 

6. As a result of the Firm Capacity assignments, ECOPETROL shall not be required to pay any Rate for such assigned capacity.

 

Section 3.06 Additional Capacity

 

(i) Should ECOPETROL so require, CENIT is required to offer Additional Capacity beyond the Firm Capacity under identical conditions as would be offered to a third party, subject to the existence of Unused Capacity.

 

9
 

 

(ii) Any Additional Capacity utilized by ECOPETROL shall be understood as having been agreed under the “Ship and Pay” modality, subject to the existence of Unused Capacity and shall be remunerated by the payment of Service Rates applicable for the Services effectively provided to ECOPETROL, except for new infrastructure owned by CENIT to which the provisions set forth in Section 2.03 (ii) apply.

 

Section 3.07 Addition to Firm Capacity

At any time, the Parties may agree that all or part of the Additional Capacity requested by ECOPETROL be added as Firm Capacity, for which the Parties shall enter into the respective agreement whereby the conditions for completing such additional shall be defined.

 

Section 3.08

Under identical conditions as those offered to third parties, any increase in capacity in the Assets and infrastructure attained by CENIT as of the Date of Signature of this Master Service Contract, may be contracted by ECOPETROL under the Additional Capacity or Firm Capacity modality, except when an increase in capacity is developed based on the particular requirements of a third party.

 

Any change to the Firm Capacity pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.05 shall require a previous written agreement by the Parties.

 

Section 3.09

The Parties understand ECOPETROL’s position in relation to other Shippers or users of the Assets is diminished if: (i) it constitutes or grants new easements for the Assets to third parties; (ii) grants, allows or acknowledges for any user or Shippers privileges or priority regarding access to the Assets that diminish the status of Shippers in terms of access to ECOPETROL’s Contracted Capacity by virtue of this Master Service Contract.

 

ECOPETROL’s diminished position in relation to other Shippers or users of the Assets in the terms provided for under this section constitutes breach of the Contract by CENIT.

 

Clause 4 Timeframes

 

Section 4.01 Term

This Master Service Contract shall take effect on the Date of Signature and shall remain in effect until it is terminated. The foregoing is notwithstanding the provision contained in sub-numeral (iv) of Section 30.01 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Section 4.02 Completion Period

CENIT is required to unconditionally and irrevocably, and subject to the conditions hereof, provide ECOPETROL with the Services described in this Master Service Contract and in turn, ECOPETROL is required to unconditionally and irrevocably, and subject to the conditions of this Master Service Contract, fulfill its obligations to CENIT, as of the Commencement Date of February 28, 2030.

 

For purposes of formalizing the commencement of the Service to be provided, the Parties shall sign a certificate of commencement specific to each one of these.

 

10
 

 

The Completion Period shall be modified when (a) CENIT’s permits, licenses or authorizations required in order to provide one or more of the contracted Services are not granted; (b) CENIT’s permits, licenses or authorizations required in order to provide one or more of the contracted Services are cancelled; (c) the extension of CENIT’s permits, licenses or authorizations required in order to provide one or more of the contracted Services cannot be granted. Should these situations arise, CENIT will still be required to provide those Services that are not impacted.

 

Section 4.03 Extension

The Completion Period shall be extended automatically in periods of five (5) Calendar Years, except where either of the Parties objects six (6) months in advance.

 

ECOPETROL must have funds available in the budget as a necessary condition for the automatic extension to take effect. The Parties must notify the other Party no less than six (6) months in advance of the date of expiration of the Completion Period of the Services that will not be extended automatically.

 

Clause 5 Value of the Contract and Consideration

 

Section 5.01 Value of the Contract

This Master Service Contract is for an undetermined amount. The final value hereof shall be established once it has been terminated and its final settlement has occurred.

 

Section 5.02 Consideration

CENIT shall be compensated for the Services through payment of Service Rates pursuant to the terms and conditions established in the General Conditions and the Chapter regulating the respective Service.

 

ECOPETROL shall only be required to pay CENIT the Service Rate applicable to Services provided to ECOPETROL, and under the terms agreed herein. Consequently, ECOPETROL shall not be required to make additional payments except where expressly agreed by the Parties or established in this Master Service Contract.

 

Section 5.03 Comprehensive nature of Service Rates

Service Rates shall include all costs, expenses, risks and utility associated with providing the Services contemplated under the Master Service Contract. Any capacity for transportation, storage, loading and otherwise that is not provided for under ECOPETROL’s Contracted Capacity, or pertains to installations to be constructed as of the signing hereof, shall be compensated independently, which must be agreed to in a separate document.

 

Section 5.04

Notwithstanding CENIT’s contractual responsibility, ECOPETROL shall not be required to remit Service Rates for the volumes of ECOPETROL Products pertaining to Identifiable Losses and Non-Identifiable Losses exceeding the maximum allowable tolerance under the law for these losses or the tolerance agreed by the Parties.

 

11
 

 

Likewise, CENIT shall not be required to take accountability for Identifiable Losses and Non-Identifiable Losses of Products that are under the maximum allowable tolerance under the law for these losses or the tolerance agreed by the Parties, except where a Justifiable Event has occurred.

 

The Parties agree that in the event there is no regulation with respect to this, the maximum tolerance shall be zero point five percent (0.5%) of the transported volumes.

 

Section 5.05 Revision of Service Rates

Service Rates may be revised:

 

(i) For Services subject to rate regulation:

 

(a) At any time when changes to the regulations for this activity or to rates occur; or

 

(b) When CENIT establishes more favorable rate conditions to third parties than those set forth in this Master Service Contract for ECOPETROL, when the agreements with third parties satisfy the following characteristics:

 

1. A Product Transport and/or Storage capacity under a Firm modality has been agreed, evaluated separately.

 

2. The transaction with the third party is carried out with regard to one or more of the Services included in this Master Service Contract.

 

3. The duration of the agreement with the third party exceeds one (1) year.

 

(ii) For other Services, pursuant to a written agreement by the Parties.

 

Section 5.06       Agreements concerning Benefits, Discounts and Monetary Conditions At any time while this Master Service Contract is in force, the Parties may agree in writing on benefits, discounts or Monetary Conditions concerning contracted Services.

 

Section 5.07 Readjustment of Rates

Rates shall be readjusted as follows:

 

(i) Rates corresponding to Services subject to regulation, based on the readjustments provided for under the corresponding rate regulation. In any event, CENIT may readjust the rates for services subject to rate regulation up to the maximum rates allowed for the corresponding regulation.

 

12
 

 

(ii) Rates for other Services shall be readjusted each Calendar Year by using:

 

(a) The consumer price index published by the National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE), or the entity that may replace it, corresponding to the immediately preceding Calendar Year, for Rates agreed in Colombian pesos;

 

(b) The Consumer Price Index of the United States of America, CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) 1982-84=100 (Unadjusted) - CUUR0000SA0 corresponding to the immediately preceding Calendar Year, pursuant to the data reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics or the entity that may replace it, for Rates agreed in United States dollars.

 

(iii) In any event, rates shall be updated pursuant as may be required by the regulation.

 

Clause 6 Invoicing and Payment

 

Section 6.01 Invoicing

CENIT shall issue an original and copy of individual invoices for each Service, i.e. Product Transport Service, Product Storage Service, Service for Loading Products into Tank Trucks, Service for portside Unloading of products and the marketing Service for Temporary Capacity Release.

 

Product Transport Service, Service for marketing Service for Temporary Capacity Release and Service for Loading Products into Tank Trucks shall be invoiced every ten (10) days in accordance with the reports concerning volumes actually transported and/or loaded during the period. The corresponding adjustments to the amounts of Firm Capacity for “Ship or Pay” or “Ship and Pay” modalities pursuant to numbers (i) and (ii) above shall be carried out on a monthly basis in order to complete invoicing for such Services. Product Storage Service and portside Loading Service for products shall be invoiced monthly.

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following will be invoiced:

 

(i) The amount of the Product Transport Service, Product Storage Service, Service for Loading Products into Tank Trucks and Service for portside Unloading of Products provided during the period invoiced, in Firm Capacity under the “Ship or Pay” modality in effect as of the invoice date. This amount shall be invoiced regardless of whether ECOPETROL utilizes such capacity.

 

(ii) The amount of the Product Transport Service, Product Storage Service, Service for Loading Products into Tank Trucks and Service for portside Unloading of Products in Firm Capacity under the “Ship and Pay” modality and Additional Capacity that has been assigned to ECOPETROL within ECOPETROL’s Scheduled Capacity for the period invoiced. This amount shall be invoiced regardless of whether ECOPETROL utilizes such capacity.

 

13
 

 

(iii) The invoicing of Rates shall be carried out taking into account any updated amounts with regard to the last Working Day for the respective period invoiced.

 

Section 6.02

Notwithstanding the foregoing, CENIT must provide ECOPETROL with an annex providing for the breakdown of the invoice based on the following factors:

 

(i) Detail concerning the volume invoiced for each Polyduct, Port and Loading Platform.

 

(ii) Detail concerning the Product Transport Rate, Product Unloading Rate, Product Loading Rate for the service invoiced for each Polyduct and Loading Platform.

 

Section 6.03

In order to facilitate and expedite the verification of ECOPETROL’s invoices, CENIT shall send a PDF copy of the invoice and any corresponding debit or credit notes via e-mail the same day the invoice is prepared, to the e-mail account registered to ECOPETROL.

 

Section 6.04 Currency

Invoices shall be issued in Colombian Pesos (COP).

 

Section 6.05 Payment

ECOPETROL is required to remit irrevocable payment of invoices as follows:

 

(i) Invoices for Product Transport Services and marketing Service of Temporary Capacity Release shall be paid by ECOPETROL within five (5) days of issuance of the respective invoice.

 

(ii) Invoices for Services for Loading Products into Tank Trucks and Product Storage Service shall be paid by ECOPETROL within thirty (30) days of issuance of the respective invoice.

 

Invoices shall be paid in Colombian pesos pursuant to the agreement of the Parties, to the bank account registered with ECOPETROL, in immediately available funds and in accordance with CENIT’s Asset Laundering Policy.

 

ECOPETROL may remit payment for invoices in United States dollars, provided that the Colombian exchange legislation in force allows payment in dollars by national residents.

 

Section 6.06 Invoicing Disputes

 

(i) CENIT must provide ECOPETROL with invoices for each service provided, yet in no case shall its receipt imply acceptance of the respective invoice.

 

14
 

 

(ii) Notwithstanding its payment obligation, ECOPETROL shall have a period of ten (10) Working Days as of the date of issuance of the invoices for each service, to review or dispute them. Upon the expiry of this period, if ECOPETROL has not raised an objection, the invoice shall be understood to have been accepted in its entirety by ECOPETROL. Objections to the invoice shall not disrupt the payment period for those amounts that are not in dispute.

 

ECOPETROL shall provide notice to CENIT within the period provided for concerning any disputed invoice so that it may be adjusted and corrected, clearly specifying the sections that should be adjusted and corrected and the respective reasons.

 

CENIT must respond to the objection within ten (10) Working Days following its receipt, so long as ECOPETROL provides CENIT with all documentation giving rise to the dispute, except where the Parties determine via mutual agreement to extend this period as may be advisable given the complexity of the objection or any other reasonable circumstance.

 

In the event that CENIT fails to respond to the objection within the aforementioned period, the objection shall be deemed accepted by CENIT. Should CENIT make a determination about the objection that is favorable to ECOPETROL, it shall be understood that there is no payment obligation for the disputed invoice as originally issued. In this case, the receipt date shall be the date of issuance of the new invoice.

 

If CENIT decides the objection in its favor, ECOPETROL shall be required to pay any outstanding amount within ten (10) Working Days following CENIT’s notification of its decision regarding the objection. In order to resolve any discrepancy, each Party shall provide the other Party with a copy of the documentation in support of the invoice and the objection. Should ECOPETROL disagree with CENIT’s determination, ECOPETROL may apply the provisions of Clause 23 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract (Disputes and Direct Settlement), in which case ECOPETROL shall not be required to remit payment of the amount in dispute to CENIT.

 

Section 6.07 Payment Delinquency.

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 19.03 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, in the case of unjustified failure to pay when due invoices not challenged by ECOPETROL, in accordance with the provisions of this Clause, ECOPETROL will pay CENIT (i) interest payable in pesos at the maximum penalty rate authorized by the Financial Superintendence each day the balance due is unpaid, or (ii) interest payable in dollars at the maximum penalty rate of Libor (+4), which under no circumstances may be more than the usury rate established by Colombian law or less than the consumer price index for the prior Calendar Year, for each day the balance due remains unpaid.

 

Invoices for collection of interest shall be paid by ECOPETROL within thirty (30) Days following the date they are submitted by CENIT.

 

Issued invoices, as well as this Master Service Contract, are enforceable per se as a judgment debt, and ECOPETROL and CENIT expressly waive any formal private or legal declarations of default.

 

15
 

 

Section 6.08 Adjustments in Invoicing

Adjustments may be made to invoiced amounts in the following cases:

 

(i) When there are adjustments due to Volumetric Balances prepared by CENIT.

 

(ii) When there are adjustments of Scheduled Capacity of ECOPETROL in the case of Firm Capacity under terms of “Ship and Pay” and Additional Capacity.

 

(iii) In cases of adjustments for Temporarily Released Capacity that arise and are used by another Shipper under the terms of Section 3.04 (i) Temporary Release of Firm Capacity under “Ship or Pay” conditions and Section 3.04 (iii) Assignment of Firm Capacity rights of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

(iv) In the event of adjustments due to objections to the invoices as set forth in this Clause.

 

(v) For Identifiable Losses and Non-Identifiable Losses, for each of the services provided and pertinent Property in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.04.

 

(vi) Due to Suspension of services performed according to the provisions of Clause 19 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, for each of the services rendered and pertinent Property.

 

(vii) Penalties to ECOPETROL for failure to comply with the Delivery and Receiving Schedule.

 

(viii) Any adjustment in keeping with the agreement between the Parties, arising from the rights and obligations of this Master Service Contract.

 

(ix) Any adjustment in keeping with the provisions of the annexes to this Master Service Contract.

 

In any case, adjustments will be made by issuing invoices or debit or credit notes subject to the same provisions regarding payment term, interest, and procedure for invoicing disputes stipulated in this Clause.

 

Section 6.09

If for any reason CENIT requests that: (i) payments be made to another natural person or legal entity, or (ii) that invoices be prepared by another natural person or legal entity, such operations by CENIT will not be binding on ECOPETROL, unless: (a) ECOPETROL is notified regarding the operation intended by CENIT at least one (1) month prior to issuance of the invoice or payment; (b) the operation intended by CENIT does not affect rights in effect on the date of the operations or the future rights of ECOPETROL regarding the invoicing method; and (c) in the event of acceptance by ECOPETROL, the assignee satisfies all the requirements established by ECOPETROL for procedures for invoicing and payments.

 

16
 

 

Section 6.10

ECOPETROL shall have a period of thirty (30) Days following the day of receipt of notification from CENIT to accept or decline. If ECOPETROL does not reply within the referenced period, it will be understood that there is no objection to the intended operation notified by CENIT.

 

Section 6.11

If CENIT is interested in factoring the invoices that it issues to ECOPETROL related to this Master Service Contract, ECOPETROL will be given the first option to pay the individual invoices for each of the services in advance; if ECOPETROL does not accept, CENIT will be free to carry out factoring of such invoices.

 

Clause 7 Representations of the Parties

 

Section 7.01 Representations of ECOPETROL

ECOPETROL represents in favor of and to the benefit of CENIT that:

 

(i) It is a company whose corporate purpose is carrying out in Colombia or in foreign countries commercial or industrial activities pertaining to or related to the exploration, production, refining, transportation, storage, distribution, and marketing of hydrocarbons, their products, and any supplementary, connected or useful activity for the performance of the foregoing, incorporated in the Republic of Colombia pursuant to Colombian law.

 

(ii) It is fully qualified pursuant to the laws of the Republic of Colombia, its company bylaws, and other company or corporate provisions to enter into this Master Service Contract and to comply with the obligations assumed under the same, and it is authorized to enter into it and comply with it according to all corporate requirements and other pertinent acts.

 

(iii) Notwithstanding the special conditions arising from the provisions of Recital 9, the signature and performance of the Master Service Contract, and the Chapters and annexes thereto do not constitute a violation or breach of the terms and conditions of any contract or agreement to which it is a party, its bylaws or any law, regulation or court order.

 

(iv) ECOPETROL has the respective budget approval for the multi-annual payments budgeted for performance of the Master Service Contract hereunder.

 

Section 7.02 Representations of CENIT

CENIT represents in favor of and to the benefit of ECOPETROL that:

 

(i) It is a simplified stock company incorporated in the Republic of Colombia pursuant to Colombian law, dedicated primarily to the transportation and storage of hydrocarbons, their products and related materials by means of transportation and/or storage systems, for which it may design, build, operate, manage, develop commercially, and own hydrocarbon transportation systems and related installations, including, without limitation to, loading platforms, unloading platforms, and storage tanks, as well as providing services related to port operation.

 

17
 

 

(ii) It is fully qualified pursuant to the laws of the Republic of Colombia, its company bylaws and other company or corporate provisions to enter into this Master Service Contract and to comply with the obligations assumed under the same, and it is authorized to enter into it and comply with it according to all corporate requirements and other pertinent acts.

 

(iii) It will have all the licenses, authorizations, and permits necessary to satisfy its obligations in order to provide the Services.

 

(iv) During the effective term of this Master Service Contract it will have available and will directly maintain or contract services with an expert operator for the operation and maintenance of infrastructure for transportation and logistics of hydrocarbons.

 

(v) The execution and performance of the Master Service Contract and the Chapters and annexes thereto do not constitute a violation or breach of the terms and conditions of any contract or agreement to which it is a party, its bylaws or any law, regulation or court order.

 

Clause 8 Obligations of the Parties

 

Section 8.01 Obligations of CENIT

The special obligations of CENIT include:

 

(i) Comply promptly with all the obligations pertaining to it according to the Master Service Contract and current law as:

 

(a) Employer;

 

(b) Party to the contract;

 

(c) Agent in the hydrocarbons chain; and

 

(d) Provider of transportation, loading, and storage services.

 

(ii) Schedule and provide the Services efficiently in accordance with the requirements of ECOPETROL, under the terms defined in this Master Service Contract.

 

(iii) Operate directly or through a third party the infrastructure associated with the Services and to perform maintenance on the same.

 

(iv) Exclusively assume all of the operating expenses and capital investments of the Property necessary to satisfy the obligations related to Firm Capacity under this Master Service Contract:

 

(v) Be liable to ECOPETROL for any event or situation that constitutes a breach of its contractual obligations.

 

18
 

 

(vi) Be liable for:

 

(a) Any damage or loss that may be incurred by third parties while carrying out the activities or performing the obligations established in this Master Service Contract.

 

(b) Any penalty and/or fine arising from failure to comply with the law or failure to comply with the permits, licenses and/or authorizations related to the performance of this Master Service Contract.

 

(vii) Abstain from carrying out or permitting any practice or behavior that is not provided for in this Master Service Contract and in applicable law, and which affects or jeopardizes the rights of ECOPETROL as user of the Services.

 

(viii) Carry out all acts and procedures necessary to ensure proper performance of the purpose of this Master Service Contract.

 

(ix) Accept nominations made by ECOPETROL within Firm Capacity related to the Services under this Master Service Contract, as well as to receive, store, handle, and deliver to ECOPETROL the Products belonging to ECOPETROL, according to the scheduling.

 

(x) Process and/or apply for any government permit and/or license that is necessary to perform the Services and the extensions thereof if necessary, and to comply fully with the aforementioned authorizations.

 

(xi) Notify ECOPETROL as soon as reasonably possible of any event that arises or that can be reasonably foreseen that affects the performance of the Services or the validity of this Master Service Contract.

 

(xii) Expedite and maintain updated, in keeping with national laws and Prudent Industry Practices, all regulations, manuals, and procedures applicable to the Services to be performed under this Master Service Contract.

 

(xiii) Ensure practices for attending to, controlling, and mitigating risks associated with the Services and for managing contingencies in order to prevent or mitigate the effects vis-à-vis the performance of the Services under this Master Service Contract.

 

(xiv) Promptly provide any reports and/or information to ECOPETROL in accordance with the stipulations of this Master Service Contract.

 

(xv) Allow ECOPETROL, at ECOPETROL’s own cost and subject to a minimum five (5) Days advance request, to carry out an inspection, audit, and verification regarding information and documentation related to this Master Service Contract.

 

19
 

 

(xvi) Facilitate and assist in attending to requests of any type that may be made by oversight agencies that monitor the activity of ECOPETROL, related to the Services and the compliance of obligations under this Master Service Contract.

 

(xvii) Continually assist with and perform all activities related to the Services under this Master Service Contract, in coordination with other Agents that provide CENIT with services of the same or a similar nature and that are necessary to address requests made by ECOPETROL.

 

(xviii) Comply with and ensure that contractors related to the performance of the Services comply with current standards regarding Hygiene, Safety, and the Environment (“ HSE” ).

 

(xix) Comply with the obligations arising from this Contract in a manner that does not infringe upon or violate, due to illegal acquisition, the patent rights, industrial secrets, copyrights or any other property right of third parties.

 

(xx) Fully comply with legal provisions regarding prevention and monitoring of asset laundering and terrorism financing (LA/FT) as applicable, efficiently and promptly implementing policies and procedures necessary for such purpose.

 

(xxi) Discharge all other obligations arising from the nature of the Master Service Contract.

 

(xxii) Proceed in such a way as to avoid causing any operational problems for ECOPETROL.

 

Section 8.02 Obligations of ECOPETROL

The special obligations of ECOPETROL include:

 

(i) Comply promptly with all the obligations pertaining to it according to the Master Service Contract and current law as:

 

(a) Employer;

 

(b) A Party to the contract; and

 

(c) Agent in the hydrocarbons chain.

 

(ii) Comply with procedures applicable to this Master Service Contract, particularly those associated with nominations, Product Quality, delivery and receipt of products, payment of invoices, and liquidation of Line Filling.

 

(iii) Nominate and deliver the nominated and accepted quantities of ECOPETROL’s Products at the applicable Entry Points, as well as to receive the pertinent volumes at the Exit Points when applicable.

 

20
 

 

(iv) Pay the Rates and pay the taxes for which it is responsible under the terms and conditions established in this Master Service Contract.

 

(v) Be liable to CENIT for any event or situation that constitutes breach of contractual obligations.

 

(vi) Be liable for:

 

(a) Any damage or loss that may be incurred by third parties during the performance of the activities or while carrying out the obligations established in this Master Service Contract.

 

(b) Any penalty and/or fine arising from failure to comply with the law or failure to comply with the permits, licenses and/or authorizations related to the performance of this Master Service Contract.

 

(vii) Make its best efforts to coordinate with other Agents who provide the same or similar services to CENIT any activities that are necessary in order to avoid hindering compliance of the obligations of CENIT arising from this Master Service Contract.

 

(viii) Notify CENIT as soon as reasonably possible of any event that arises or that could reasonably be foreseen that affects or could affect the performance of the Services of the legal effect of this Master Service Contract.

 

(ix) Carry out all the acts and procedures necessary to ensure proper performance of the purpose of this Master Service Contract.

 

(x) Attend diligently to operational requests made by CENIT in order to ensure proper operation of infrastructure associated with performance of the services.

 

(xi) Operate and maintain the Shipper Installations according to Prudent Industry Practices.

 

(xii) Comply with current standards for product marking, additivization and blending of the Product.

 

(xiii) Proceed in such a way as to avoid causing any operational problems for CENIT.

 

(xiv) Comply with the Transporter’s Manual issued by CENIT for performance of the services. For the purpose of implementing CENIT’s Transporter’s Manual, the procedures for presentation will be used as determined by the official regulations issued by the Competent Authority or, in the absence thereof, by applying the guidelines established in Resolution 181258 of July 14, 2010 (or any that may modify, replace or eliminate it) which regulates transportation of crude in oil pipelines.

 

(xv) Promptly deliver the reports and/or information to CENIT in accordance with the stipulations of this Master Service Contract.

 

21
 

 

(xvi) Inform CENIT and the Competent Authorities in due time regarding risks, contingencies, accidents, illicit acts, and in general any matter that could affect interest groups related to the purpose of the Contract.

 

(xvii) Comply and ensure compliance by contractors as it relates to the performance of the Services of current standards in matters of Hygiene, Safety, and Environment (“HSE”) .

 

(xviii) Comply with the obligations arising from this Contract in such a manner as not to infringe or violate, by illegal acquisition, patent rights, industrial secrets, copyrights or any other right of ownership of third parties.

 

(xix) Facilitate and assist in addressing requests of any type made by oversight entities that monitor the activity of CENIT as it relates to compliance with the obligations under this Master Service Contract.

 

(xx) Allow CENIT, at CENIT’s own cost and subject to prior request at least five (5) Days in advance, to carry out an inspection, audit, and verification regarding information and documentation related to this Master Service Contract.

 

(xxi) Fully comply with legal provisions regarding prevention and monitoring of asset laundering and terrorism financing ( LA/FT ) as applicable, efficiently and promptly implementing policies and procedures necessary for such purpose.

 

(xxii) Discharge all other obligations arising from the nature of the Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 9 Followup Committee

 

Notwithstanding the authority of ECOPETROL to supervise and audit compliance of the obligations of CENIT, the Parties agree to form a Followup Committee whose principal objective will be to monitor performance of the Services. It will be governed by the following rules:

 

Section 9.01 Formation

The Followup Committee will consist of four (4) members and their alternates. Each Party will appoint two (2) members with their respective alternates. Each Party may independently replace their members on the Followup Committee, and it will be necessary to inform the other Party in writing of any change at least fifteen (15) Days prior to the date the appointed person fills the position.

 

Section 9.02 Duties

The Followup Committee will have the following duties:

 

(i) Analyze situations that affect performance of the Services in order to recommend the actions to be taken.

 

22
 

 

(ii) Study any items of interest submitted by the Parties in order to improve performance of the Services according to the requirements of the Parties.

 

(iii) Present and track claims submitted by ECOPETROL and CENIT due to or related to performance of the Master Service Contract.

 

(iv) Define, stipulate, discuss, and request reports and clarifications that the Parties must deliver to the other Party under this Master Service Contract due to performance of the same.

 

The duties of the Followup Committee shall under no circumstances be understood as authority of ECOPETROL to co-manage performance of the Services or to affect the technical, administrative, financial, and operating autonomy of CENIT.

 

Section 9.03 Meetings

The Followup Committee shall meet at least once a month within the first ten (10) Days of the respective month, notwithstanding the ability to meet at any other time when circumstances require, by communication sent by one of the representatives to another.

 

Annual scheduling of meetings will be carried out by CENIT and sent to ECOPETROL within the first fifteen (15) Days of December of each Calendar Year. For the first year of the Completion Period of the Master Service Contract, the schedule will be sent no later than the last Working Day of April 2013.

 

Clause 10 Exclusion of Employment Affiliation

 

(i) This Master Service Contract establishes a purely commercial affiliation between the Parties associated with the performance of the Services, and therefore this Master Service Contract does not entail any employment affiliation or subordination or intermediation between the Parties, or between any one of them and the personnel that, under the Master Service Contract, each Party appoints for compliance of the same.

 

(ii) CENIT shall be and be considered an independent contractor and not the agent, representative, or mere intermediary of ECOPETROL. At no time will CENIT be authorized to bind ECOPETROL or to act on its behalf, except with express authorization in writing from ECOPETROL. The performance of the Master Service Contract shall be under the exclusive supervision and control of CENIT.

 

(iii) Each Party and its subcontractors, and the workers of any or all of them, shall not be subordinated in the work to the other Party, nor will they be the other Party’s intermediaries, and shall have full technical, administrative, and managerial autonomy with respect to their obligations under this Master Service Contract.

 

23
 

 

Clause 11 Claims

 

Notwithstanding (i) the procedure for claims established for invoices under Section 6.06 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract and (ii) the special procedure established for management of indemnities, any other claim that ECOPETROL may have arising from the performance of this Master Service Contract shall be submitted in writing no later than sixty (60) Days following occurrence of the event from which the claim arose, with any applicable supporting arguments.

 

All claims will be processed according to the procedures defined by CENIT for attending to complaints and claims promptly and diligently, within a maximum period of sixty (60) Days to provide a substantive response regarding the same.

 

This claims procedure in no way affects the rights of ECOPETROL to claim any type of damage, loss, or indemnity in accordance with the procedures established in this Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 12 Environmental and occupational health liability

 

Section 12.01 CENIT:
(i) Is the sole party responsible for any damage or deterioration, however slight, that CENIT or its workers or contractors cause related to performance of the Services in the air, water, soil, or to human health and animal or plant life, or for pollution or damage to highways, internal roads, streets, marshes, rivers, drainage ditches, parks, green areas, residential areas, and equipment or plants, as a consequence of the performance of its activities, and consequently will hold ECOPETROL harmless under the terms of this Master Service Contract provided that the occurrence of such damage is not due to an act and/or omission of ECOPETROL.

 

(ii) Declares that it is aware of Colombian law regarding protection of human health, natural resources, and the environment, and agrees to abide by it.

 

(iii) Acknowledges that it will be the sole party responsible for compliance with laws on occupational health, safety of all personnel who work for CENIT or for its contractors relating to the performance of the Services and protection of property.

 

(iv) Agrees to implement a special policy for protection of health and conservation of the environment according to Prudent Industry Practices, expressly making employees and contractors aware of it as it relates to performance of the Services.

 

Under such policy, in actual practice CENIT shall give proper attention to the environment, workers’ health, and health of other people at the locations where the Master Service Contract will be performed, preserving the air, water, soil, and animal and plant life from any adverse effect that could arise from activities pertaining to the Master Service Contract and collaborating closely with ECOPETROL.

 

24
 

 

(v) Shall provide all protection systems necessary to ensure the safety of the people and property of ECOPETROL, being directly responsible for any damage arising from performance of the Master Service Contract.

 

Section 12.02 ECOPETROL:

 

May carry out periodic inspections at CENIT installations relating to providing Services in order to verify compliance with standards for the protection of health, environment, and property as well as to detect any harmful or hazardous action with notification ten (10) Days in advance, for which it shall have and has the respective authorization.

 

Any violation of standards attributable to CENIT regarding protection of health, environmental protection, and handling of property, as established in this Clause during the performance of this Master Service Contract shall be corrected by CENIT at its own cost and risk.

 

Clause 13 Corporate Responsibility

 

CENIT agrees to:

 

(i) Respect and observe the Code of Good Governance, the Policies of Comprehensive Responsibility, and Corporate Responsibility of ECOPETROL, and the policies on prevention, oversight, and management of the risk of asset laundering and terrorism financing of ECOPETROL. In the event of contradictory provisions between the policies of CENIT and those of ECOPETROL, the Parties agree in good faith to agree on a solution and a course of action to follow.

 

(ii) Endeavor to establish and maintain good relations with the institutions (Competent Authorities) and communities located in the regions and areas where the Master Service Contract will be performed.

 

(iii) Report to the contract manager of the Master Service Contract or to the person who carries out his/her duties, any incident or event that could affect its image and/or that of ECOPETROL within three (3) Working Days following their occurrence in order to handle the matter jointly.

 

Clause 14 Transparency Commitment

 

The Parties agree to:

 

(i) Uphold appropriate behaviors and oversight to ensure ethical conduct in accordance with current standards.

 

(ii) Abstain from making (directly or indirectly or through employees, representatives, affiliates or contractors), payments, loans, gifts, bonuses, commissions to employees, management, administrators, contractors or suppliers of the Parties, public officials, members of popularly-elected bodies or political parties, with the purpose of inducing such persons to carry out an act or make a decision or use their influence with the objective of contributing to obtain or retain business transactions related to the Master Service Contract.

 

25
 

 

(iii) Refrain from producing incorrect records or information or distributing information that affects the image of the other Party when it is based on unfounded conjectures.

 

(iv) Report to each other any deviation from the policy of conduct indicated in this Clause.

 

Clause 15 Code of Good Governance and Asset Laundering Policies

 

The Parties agree to respect and observe the Code of Good Governance and Policies of Loyalty and Transparency of CENIT and the Code of Good Governance and Asset Laundering Policy of ECOPETROL, which will be available respectively on the web pages of CENIT and ECOPETROL. In the event of conflicting provisions between the policies of CENIT and those of ECOPETROL, the Parties will implement in good faith the dispute resolution procedure established in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 16 Responsibility

 

Section 16.01 Responsibility of the Parties

 

(i) The Parties declare that they are aware of the conditions of public order and safety of the areas in which the purpose of the Master Service Contract will be carried out in whole or in part, and each Party assumes responsibility for its own risks arising from such conditions.

 

(ii) Each Party shall be solely responsible for damages incurred by third parties due to its activity. Specifically, each Party will be responsible for any loss or damage to all third party property or third party injury, illness or death as a result of acts or omissions or those of its personnel or those of the personnel of its contractors.

 

(iii) Compliance with the pertinent legal obligations of each of the Parties, between them specifically including those related to their operation, their personnel, compliance with environmental policies, those related to the legality of rights of intellectual property, of tax provisions or any others of a similar nature, is the duty and sole responsibility of the Party with whom the referenced obligation rests, and any noncompliance will only affect the referenced Party.

 

Section 16.02 Contractual Responsibility of CENIT

 

(i) With the exception of the provisions of numbers (ii) and (iii) of this Section and/or in each Chapter within the Master Service Contract, CENIT will be liable in all cases for damages incurred by ECOPETROL that are generated, derived from, or related to any breach in whole or in part by CENIT, whether by act or omission, of the obligations contained in this Master Service Contract.

 

26
 

 

(ii) CENIT will be liable for damages arising from breach in the availability of Firm Capacity in any events in which the latter is under the Minimum Firm Capacity Availability established in Section 3.03 of the General Conditions.

 

(iii) CENIT will only be exonerated in whole or in part from liability for failure to perform or for defective or late performance of its obligations under this Master Service Contract if it provides full proof that the cause of the damage is due to a Justified Event and that it also made all the Reasonable Efforts.

 

Section 16.03 Contractual liability of ECOPETROL

ECOPETROL will be liable for damages incurred by CENIT that are generated, derived from, or related to any breach in whole or in part by ECOPETROL by act or omission of the obligations under this Master Service Contract, except when there are grounds for exemption from liability in accordance with the law.

 

Clause 17 Indemnity

 

Section 17.01 CENIT:

Agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold ECOPETROL, parent companies of ECOPETROL, subordinate companies of ECOPETROL (excluding CENIT), directors of ECOPETROL, officers of ECOPETROL, representatives and/or employees of ECOPETROL harmless from any claim, complaint, litigation, legal or non-legal action, argument and judgment of any type or nature filed or that may be filed against any of them by third parties, arising from or related to the activities of Transportation of Products, Storage of Products, and Loading of Products on Tank Trucks, except when it is due to events of bad faith or gross negligence of ECOPETROL.

 

Consequently, all costs and expenses necessary for repair or compensation of such damages, costs, expenses or loss will be borne exclusively by CENIT, as well as legal and non-legal costs incurred and attorneys’ fees.

 

Section 17.02 ECOPETROL:

Agrees to hold CENIT, parent companies of CENIT (Excluding ECOPETROL), subordinate companies of CENIT, directors of CENIT, officers of CENIT, representatives and/or employees of CENIT harmless from any claim, complaint, litigation, legal or non-legal action, argument and judgment of any type or nature filed or that may be filed against any of them by third parties, arising from or related to the performance of the obligations of ECOPETROL under this Master Service Contract, except when due to events of bad faith or gross negligence of CENIT.

 

Therefore, ECOPETROL will be exclusively responsible for all costs and expenses needed for repair or compensation of such damages, costs, expenses or losses, as well as legal and non-legal costs that may arise and attorneys’ fees.

 

27
 

 

Section 17.03 CENIT and/or ECOPETROL

 

CENIT and/or ECOPETROL, as applicable (hereinafter the “ Claimant Party ”), may file claims or the pertinent actions to enforce the indemnity set forth in Sections 17.01. and17.02 of Clause 17 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, subject to the procedure established below:

 

Section 17.04 Indemnity claim procedure.

 

(i) In the event that any of the Claimant Parties seeks to be held harmless or defended in the event of the indemnity obligations provided in this Clause, the interested Claimant Party shall notify the other party (hereinafter the “ Respondent Party ”) promptly regarding the process, claim or loss.

 

(ii) In the case of court orders, the Claimant Party shall answer the complaint promptly and implead or file a formal accusation against the Respondent Party, as applicable, unless the Parties reach a direct mutual agreement.

 

(iii) In the case of administrative procedures, the Claimant Party shall file any timely recourse allowed by governmental channels.

 

The Parties may agree at any time that the Respondent Party shall directly assume the legal or administrative defense of the Claimant Party. In such event, the Claimant Party will collaborate and provide assistance to the Respondent Party in order to take necessary or advisable measures in the course of the process, including conferring powers of attorney.

 

The Parties agree that neither the Claimant Party nor the Respondent Party may conciliate, settle or in any other way agree or commit to any aspect of the procedure by means of which the Claimant Party seeks to be held harmless or defended by the Respondent Party, without the prior consent of the other Party, unless settlement, conciliation or consent includes the unconditional release of the Claimant Party or of the Respondent Party, as the case may be, from all liability within the process. The aforementioned requested consent may not be unreasonably denied or delayed by the Party from whom such consent was requested.

 

(iv) The Claimant Party and the Respondent Party shall work closely and consistently together regarding the situation and the status of any action or means of defense that the Claimant Party may have initiated or filed. If the Parties agree that the Respondent Party would assume the defense directly, the latter shall keep the Claimant Party informed about the status of the process. Also, the Claimant Party must inform the Respondent Party of the status of the process.

 

28
 

 

(v) After the process is concluded, as applicable, the Respondent Party will be obligated to pay the Claimant Party within a period of not more than sixty (60) Days following receipt by the Respondent Party of the Claimant Party’s written communication regarding the conclusion of the process, and the amount established in the ruling, sentence, award or act that ends the process, including all applicable interests, arrears and penalties, as established in the respective proceeding.

 

(vi) In the event that the decision of the Respondent Party is to not initiate or file actions or means of defense or, as applicable, the respective response to charges and clarifications are not submitted, the Respondent Party will proceed to pay the Claimant Party the pertinent amount according to the notification of third-party claim, and as of the payment date will be released of any liability due to the aforementioned procedure or court order.

 

(vii) The defense strategy shall endeavor to ensure that the Claimant Party is not subject to attachment or other loss. If such precautionary measures, attachment or similar processes are ordered that affect the operations of the Claimant Party, the Respondent Party will take the pertinent legal steps to lift or suspend such measures, doing so promptly and diligently.

 

(viii) With regard to any claim of the Claimant Party according to the provisions of this Master Service Contract, the Respondent Party shall make the pertinent payment:

 

(a) Within sixty (60) Days following the date the claim was made, in the event that it is with regard to a matter as to which there is no dispute between the Parties; or

 

(b) Within sixty (60) Days following the date of the final ruling or the agreement reached regarding the claim, in the event of a dispute between the Parties related to the same.

 

(ix) The Parties agree to cooperate to the greatest extent possible in connection with any third-party claim regarding which indemnity may or may not be demanded under this Master Service Contract.

 

Section 17.05

If subsequent to the date the respective legal or administrative process is concluded, a dispute arises between the Parties with respect to the indemnity obligation, the same will be resolved by means of the mechanism established in Clause 23 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 18 Confidentiality

 

Section 18.01

The Parties agree to maintain strictly confidential, without disclosing to anyone, the information notified as confidential (hereinafter the “ Information ”), that was furnished during the performance of this Master Service Contract and during the activities of ECOPETROL and/or of CENIT.

 

29
 

 

Section 18.02

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Information may be disclosed only in the following cases:

 

(i) When disclosure of the Information is required by law;

 

(ii) When disclosure of the Information is ordered by a Competent Authority;

 

(iii) When the information in question is of the public domain, without being due to any act or omission of the Parties; or

 

(iv) When the person who provided the information has authorized it in writing in each case.

 

Section 18.03

For any information that must be or needs to be disclosed as stipulated in the foregoing sections, the disclosure in question will only take place after consultation, if the deadline granted by law or the Competent Authority who ordered disclosure of the information permits, with the Party who provided the information. In cases in which it is not possible to implement the period granted by law or the Competent Authority to disclose the information, the Party disclosing the information shall subsequently inform the other Party of the referenced disclosure.

 

Section 18.04

In addition, the Information will be understood as being available for disclosure to employees, advisors, and officers of the Parties.

 

Section 18.05

The Parties may disclose the Information without prior written consent of the other to an Affiliate company, provided that the Parties guarantee that the aforementioned Affiliate company will observe the confidentiality terms and other conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Section 18.06

In all cases, the Parties shall ensure that the people to whom the Information is disclosed maintain such Information confidential and abstain from disclosing it. The Parties will be responsible for any disclosure of Information by their employees, advisors, and officers. If the Parties become aware of an authorized disclosure of Information, it will be immediately notified to the other Party, and they will jointly take the measures necessary and/or advisable to prevent other disclosures of Information in the future.

 

Section 18.07

The Parties will only use or allow use of the disclosed Information in the performance of this Master Service Contract in order to comply with it. Disclosure of Information under this Master Service Contract will not grant any other right.

 

30
 

 

Section 18.08

The Parties will be responsible if, through negligent acts or omissions, they disclose or make any Information public outside the terms provided hereunder in accordance with the law.

 

Section 18.09

Either of the Parties may demand return of the Information at any time after written notification to the other Party. Within thirty (30) Days following receipt of such notification, the receiving Party shall return all original Information and will destroy or ensure destruction of all copies and reproductions (in any form, including but not limited to electronic means) that it has in its possession or in possession of people to whom it was disclosed under this Master Service Contract. In all cases, at the end of the Completion Period of the Master Service Contract, each of the Parties shall return to the other Party all original Information and destroy or ensure destruction of all copies and reproductions (in any form, including but not limited to electronic means) that it has in its possession or in possession of people to whom it was disclosed under this Master Service Contract.

 

Section 18.10

During the Completion Period, the Parties agree to maintain in reserve and not disclose the Information expressly identified in writing by each of them that is protected by copyright or industrial secrecy according to current laws, which is directly delivered by one of the Parties to the other due to the performance of the Master Service Contract, and agree not to provide the aforementioned Information to third parties, unless ordered by Competent Authorities or in events in which current legal provisions so require.

 

This confidentiality Clause will remain in effect even after termination of the Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 19 Suspension

 

Section 19.01 Suspension of the Services

Performance of the Services may be suspended in part when:

 

(i) In the case of Justified Events. In these cases the affected Party shall notify the other Party, first by the most expeditious means and later in writing within twenty-four (24) hours regarding the respective situation, indicating the events that brought about the Justified Event. Also, the evaluation of the Justified Event and its consequences will be communicated in writing within twenty-four (24) hours of the conclusion of the respective Justified Event.

 

The Party affected by a Justified Event is obligated to do everything reasonably advisable and possible, under extraordinary conditions, to mitigate and reduce the effects of the Justified Event, as well as to overcome them as soon as possible.

 

Partial suspension of the Services does not authorize either of the Parties to interrupt performance of their other contractual obligations that are not affected by the partial suspension.

 

31
 

 

(ii) When due to causes not attributable to CENIT it does not have the permits, licenses or authorizations required to perform the Services, notwithstanding the responsibility of CENIT under the provisions of Sections 8.01 and 16.02 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

(iii) Causes attributable to CENIT that make it impossible to perform the Services, notwithstanding CENIT’s contractual liability for breach of its obligations.

 

(iv) Negligent breach by ECOPETROL except when it is a matter of disputed amounts of money. Negligent breach will be considered to exist when ECOPETROL has failed to comply with its payment obligations after the credit limit granted by CENIT is reached.

 

(v) In order to comply with the applicable regulation or at the disposition of the Competent Authority, including but not limited to prioritization of transportation, loading and/or storage of Products.

 

(vi) Due to scheduled maintenance and/or work of the Property and infrastructure of CENIT included within the Delivery and Receiving Schedule that do not affect the Service Factor.

 

Section 19.02

Suspension of the Services will not affect the authority of ECOPETROL to search for and implement alternatives that allow it to ensure supply of suspended Services directly by another supplier, regarding which CENIT may not make claims or request any compensation.

 

Section 19.03

ECOPETROL will not be obligated to pay the Service Rate that has been suspended for any cause other than that indicated in numbers (i) and (iv) of Section 19.01, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 19.04.

 

Section 19.04

In the case of suspension of the Product Transport Service due to occurrence of a Justified Event in the Pozos Colorados — Galan Products Pipeline, pursuant to the provisions of number (i) of Section 19.01, the following procedure will apply:

 

(i) When during the same Calendar Year, one or more Justified Events are alleged by CENIT, jointly or separately, as a cause of suspension of the Product Transport Service through the aforementioned Products Polyduct, ECOPETROL shall be obligated to pay the lower price in effect at the time of the suspension between operating and maintenance costs or the current Transport Rate recognized by the Ministry of Mines and Energy or the entity that replaces it, applicable to Firm Capacity under “Ship or Pay” terms.

 

If within the same Calendar Year the Product Transport Services have been suspended for continuous or discontinuous periods whose total exceeds ninety (90) Days after the first Day of suspension, ECOPETROL, after Day ninety-one (91) of the suspension, will not be obligated to pay any amount to CENIT until the pertinent Service is recommenced.

 

32
 

 

(ii) When during the same Calendar Year one or more Justified Events are alleged by ECOPETROL, jointly or separately, that lead to suspension of the Product Transport Service by the aforementioned Products Polyduct, ECOPETROL will not be obligated to pay the Transport Rate for Product Transport Services until day ninety (90) of the suspension.

 

If during the same Calendar Year the Services have been suspended for continuous or discontinuous periods that exceed ninety (90) Days following the first Day of suspension, ECOPETROL shall be obligated to pay the Transport Rate for Firm Capacity under “Ship or Pay” terms as of Day ninety-one (91) of the suspension, until the requirement for Product Transport Services by ECOPETROL is recommenced.

 

Section 19.05

For other Property and Services, with the exception of the Service of Loading Products on Tank Trucks in the case of suspension or failure to provide the Services due to a Justified Event, in accordance with the provisions of number (i) of Section 19.01, the following procedure shall apply:

 

(i) When during the same Calendar Year one or more Justified Events are alleged by CENIT, jointly or separately, as a cause of suspension of one or more Services for one or more Property in particular, ECOPETROL, during the first ninety (90) Days of suspension, will be obligated to pay the Firm Capacity Rate under “Ship or Pay” terms for the suspended Services.

 

If during the same Calendar Year the Services for particular Property have been suspended for continuous or discontinuous periods that exceed ninety (90) Days following the first Day of suspension, ECOPETROL will not be obligated to pay the Rate until the pertinent Service is recommenced.

 

(ii) When during the same Calendar Year one or more Justified Events are alleged by ECOPETROL, jointly or separately, which lead to suspension of one or more Services for one or more of the items of Property, ECOPETROL will not be obligated to pay the Firm Capacity Rate under “Ship or Pay” terms for suspended Services.

 

If during the same Calendar Year the Services have been suspended for continuous or discontinuous periods that exceed ninety (90) Days following the first Day of suspension, ECOPETROL will be obligated to pay the Rate as of Day ninety-one (91) of suspension, until the requirement for Crude Transportation Services by ECOPETROL is recommenced.

 

33
 

 

Clause 20 Termination of the Master Service Contract

 

This Master Service Contract shall terminate:

 

(i) Due to expiration of the stipulated Completion Period; or

 

(ii) By mutual agreement of the Parties.

 

Clause 21 Settlement of the Master Service Contract

After termination of the Master Service Contract, the Parties will sign the record of finalization of performance.

 

The Parties will prepare the final settlement of the Master Service Contract by mutual agreement within six (6) months following the Termination Date of the Master Service Contract. For such purpose ECOPETROL will prepare the record of finalization, which will be submitted for review by CENIT.

 

If CENIT does not agree on the final settlement or there is no agreement regarding the content of the same within the aforementioned term, ECOPETROL may independently make a final settlement in one (1) month, which in any case is not binding on CENIT and may be challenged by the latter.

 

The record of final settlement will expressly set forth the following:

 

(i) Declaration regarding compliance of obligations of each of the Parties in the performance of the Master Service Contract; and

 

(ii) Any agreements, conciliations, and settlements reached by the Parties in order to finalize differences and prepare a no-debt certificate.

 

After final settlement of the Master Service Contract, each Party shall pay the other any amounts owed for any reason that are obtained in the final settlement procedure, after making any pertinent deductions.

 

Clause 22 Assignment and subcontracting

 

Section 22.01

The Parties shall have the right to assign or transfer in whole or in part their interests, rights, and obligations under this Master Service Contract according to the rules established in this Master Service Contract. Any assignment or transfer that is contrary to the aforementioned rules will not be valid or binding on the other Party.

 

Section 22.02 Assignment by CENIT

CENIT may assign in whole or in part the rights and obligations under this Master Service Contract provided that it does not affect the rights of ECOPETROL to the Services. Any assignment of rights and obligations that affects the rights of ECOPETROL under this Master Service Contract will require prior written approval from ECOPETROL, unless the assignment is made to a subordinate or controlling company of CENIT.

 

34
 

 

For the effects of the provisions of this number, CENIT will submit a written request for approval, indicating the essential elements of the transaction, such as possible parties, rights and obligations, scope of the assignment, and the manner they affect or may affect the referenced rights of ECOPETROL. ECOPETROL will have a term of thirty (30) Days following delivery of the request for approval to provide the decision to accept or reject the request. If ECOPETROL fails to answer within such term, the assignment will be considered approved.

 

Section 22.03 Assignment by ECOPETROL

ECOPETROL may assign in part or in whole the rights and obligations under this Master Service Contract provided that it strictly complies with the same provisions of Section 3.05 number (iii), letter b, sub-number 2 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Section 22.04 Subcontracting

CENIT may subcontract all or part of the obligations for the performance of the Services. In all cases:

 

(i) CENIT shall maintain control and supervision of activities of its subcontractors.

 

(ii) CENIT shall continue to be the sole party responsible to ECOPETROL for compliance of its obligations under this Master Service Contract.

 

(iii) There shall be no contractual connection between ECOPETROL and subcontractors of CENIT.

 

(iv) Any complaint, claim or petition of a subcontractor of CENIT shall be entirely addressed by CENIT.

 

(v) No breach by subcontractors of CENIT will be considered a Justified Event, extraneous cause or exculpatory circumstance for CENIT vis-à-vis ECOPETROL.

 

Clause 23 Dispute Resolution

 

In the event of any type of disagreement, dispute or controversy arising from this Master Service Contract, either of the Parties shall be obligated first to request from the other Party a direct solution of the same. For such purpose, the Party who considers that there is a disagreement shall notify the other Party within twenty (20) Days following the occurrence or verification of the same. Within ten (10) Working Days following receipt of the notification, the Parties shall meet to directly resolve the disagreement in question within a period of twenty (20) Working Days. After such period has expired, if there is no agreement, the Parties may resort to the mechanisms of dispute resolution provided by law.

 

35
 

 

Clause 24 Regulatory Adjustment

 

The conditions established in this Master Service Contract, its Chapters and annexes, shall be adjusted to satisfy any regulatory changes made or implemented by the Competent Authority that:

 

(i) Are binding upon any of the Parties and conflict with the provisions of this Master Service Contract

 

(ii) Cause financial imbalance in the Contract as it pertains to any of the Parties

 

The Parties agree in good faith to renegotiate the terms of the Contract in order to re-establish the economic balance, and if no agreement is reached, they will resort to the mechanism provided in Clause 23.

 

Clause 25 Taxes

 

All national, departmental, district or municipal taxes, contributions, fees, surcharges, and assessments payable due to the execution, performance and final settlement of this Master Service Contract shall be paid by the Party to whom such payment pertains according to the law.

 

Clause 26 Guarantees

 

Considering the fact that (i) CENTI is a subsidiary of ECOPETROL and (ii) in addition to this Master Service Contract, ECOPETROL and CENIT have executed an Operation and Maintenance and Project Management Contract, the Parties agree that this Master Service Contract shall not cause either of them any obligation to establish guarantees.

 

Clause 27 Notifications

 

(i) Communications and invoices sent between CENIT and ECOPETROL pursuant to this Master Service Contract must be provided in writing in order for them to be valid, and must, at the discretion of the issuing Party, be delivered personally or transmitted by fax, email or by any other means permitting verification of their dispatch and receipt (including proof of receipt and confirmation by mail).

 

(ii) All communications shall be regarded as having been received and as having had the desired effect:

 

(a) On the date of receipt, if delivered in person, or

 

(b) Twenty-four (24) hours after the date of transmission if transmitted by fax, email or any other means permitting verification of their dispatch and receipt, so long as the confirmation is received within the following eight (8) days, whichever comes first.

 

(iii) Each Party may change its address for the purposes contained herein subject to notice in writing to the other Party fifteen (15) days in advance of the expected date of the changes.

 

(iv) All notifications and communications that the Parties must make in connection with the execution of this Contract shall be made to the following addresses:

 

36
 

 

ECOPETROL

 

Address Carrera 7 No. 37 – 69 Piso 9 Edificio Teusacá
Contact Alvaro Castañeda Caro
Telephone 2343491
Fax 2343532
City Bogotá D.C.
Email alvaro.castañeda@ecopetrol.com.co

 

CENIT

 

Address Carrera 9 No. 76 49 Piso 4
Contact Camilo Marulanda López
Jorge Alberto Castiblanco
Juan Pablo Ospina
Telephone 3198800
Fax 3198700
City Bogotá D.C.
Email

camilo.marulanda@cenit-transporte.com

jorge.castiblanco@cenit-transporte.com

juan.ospina@cenit-transporte.com

 

Clause 28 Domicile

 

The contractual domicile for all legal and procedural purposes shall be the city of Bogotá D.C.

 

Clause 29 Applicable Law

 

This Master Service Contract shall for all purposes be governed by the laws of the Republic of Colombia.

 

Clause 30 Integrity of the Contract and its Amendments

 

Section 30.01 Completeness

 

(i) This Master Service Contract contains a full and complete listing of the terms accepted and agreed by the Parties to govern the legal transactions with respect to ECOPETROL’s Contracted Capacity relating to Property, together with the Services that will be provided by CENIT in connection with these. The Parties mutually agree to the complete invalidation of all agreements, accords, contracts, understandings or conversations they may have had prior to the Date of Signing with respect to ECOPETROL’s Services and Contracted Capacity.

 

37
 

 

(ii) The following documents constitute part of the Master Service Contract:

 

Chapter I – Product Transport Service

 

ANNEX TP-1 Quality Specifications
   
ANNEX TP-2 Polyducts
   
ANNEX TP-3 CENIT Transporter’s Manual
   
ANNEX TP-4 Product Transport Rates per Polyduct
   
ANNEX TP-5 ECOPETROL’s Contracted Capacity per Polyduct
   
ANNEX TP-6 CENIT Measurement Manual
   
ANNEX TP-7 Conditions for the Use of the Strategic Inventory

 

Chapter II – Product Storage Service

 

ANNEX AP-1 Storage Installations
   
ANNEX AP-2 ECOPETROL’s Contracted Capacity for Storage
   
ANNEX AP-3 Storage Service Rates

 

Chapter III – Tank Truck Product Loading Service

 

ANNEX CPC-1 Platforms
   
ANNEX CPC-2 ECOPETROL’s Contracted Capacity per Platform
   
ANNEX CPC-3 Tank Truck Product Loading Service Rates
   
ANNEX CPC-4 Operation and Loading Standards

 

Chapter IV – Portside Product Unloading Service

 

ANNEX DPP-1 Ports
   
ANNEX DPP-2 Portside Product Unloading Service Rates
   
ANNEX DPP-3 Port Operation Regulations
   
ANNEX DPP-4 Procedure for Resolving Delays
   
ANNEX DPP-5 ECOPETROL’s Contracted Capacity for Ports

 

38
 

 

ANNEX DPP-6 Port Entry and Exit Points
   
ANNEX DPP-7 Procedure for Scheduling Windows
   
ANNEX DPP-8 Product Quality Specifications for Unloading in Ports
   
ANNEX DPP-9 MARPOL

 

(iii) Should any provision of this Master Service Contract be prohibited, null, ineffective or incapable of enforcement in accordance with current law, the remaining stipulations shall survive it with full binding and obligatory effect for the Parties, unless the provision found to be prohibited, null, ineffective or unenforceable was essential in nature, to the extent that it would not be possible to interpret or comply with the same in the absence of that provision. In such an event, the Parties agree in good faith to negotiate a legally valid Clause whose purpose matches the provision or provisions suffering from the defects of nullity, invalidity or unenforceability.

 

(iv) The termination of this Master Service Contract shall not relieve the Parties of any obligation owed to the other Party in accordance with this Master Service Contract, or from liability for any loss, cost, damage, expense or responsibility that could arise under this Master Service Contract before or as a result of the aforementioned termination.

 

Clauses 1, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 23, 25 and 29, among others, shall therefore survive the termination of this Master Service Contract.

 

Section 30.02 Amendments

Only those amendments to this Master Service Contract and its Chapters and Annexes shall be valid as recorded in a document signed by both Parties. No changes to the shareholder composition of CENIT shall be tantamount to an amendment to the conditions agreed to in this Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 31 Finalization of the Contract

 

The Master Service Contract shall only be regarded as finalized once it has been signed.

 

Clause 32 Legal and Contractual Requirements for Execution

 

The execution of the Master Service Contract may only commence on the Date of Commencement.

 

39
 

 

Clause 33 Definitions

 

A

 

Additional Capacity: The capacity in addition to the Firm Capacity for each of the Services to which ECOPETROL is entitled by virtue of the Master Service Contract and which shall be calculated in BPCD. CENIT has no firm commitment with respect to this capacity; that is to say, it is offered by CENIT under the uninterrupted modality.

 

Affiliate: This is: (i) any person who directly or indirectly controls any of the Parties; (ii) a legal entity directly controlled by the Parties; (iii) a legal entity indirectly controlled by any of the Parties through its subsidiaries. A control situation shall be understood as existing when the events provided in article 261 of the Commercial Code occur.

 

Agent: Any natural or legal person, whether public or private, who participates in the technical and/or commercial aspects of the provision of the Product Transport Service, Product Storage Service and Portside Product Loading Service in accordance with current regulations where applicable.

 

API: Either (i) the American Petroleum Institute, or (ii) a unit of density used internationally as one of the properties for determining the sale of Hydrocarbons. It is defined as follows: API = 141.5/SG-131.5 in which SG is defined as specific gravity.

 

Asset Contribution Contract: Contract by means of which ECOPETROL transfers infrastructure or assets owned, franchised or approved by it to CENIT.

 

Authorized Quantity: Quantity of the Products that CENIT accepts for transportation by the Transport System.

 

Available Capacity: For a specific infrastructure and over a specific period of time, this is the difference between the Effective Capacity and the total of: (i) the Owner’s Capacity and (ii) the Contracted Capacity.

 

B

 

Barrel: Unit of Product volume equal to forty-two (42) U.S. gallons. Each gallon is equivalent to three liters and seven thousand eight hundred fifty-three ten-thousandths of a liter (3.7853).

 

Barrel Per Calendar Day (BPCD): The unit of measure of the flow rate with respect to the average value for a specific period.

 

Barrel Per Operational Day (BPOD): The unit of measure of the flow rate with respect to days of effective operation.

 

Batch: Batches are product volumes that are different and fully differentiated and that are transported along the polyduct one after the other in a predefined sequence, with interphases occurring between them.

 

40
 

 

C

 

Calendar Month: The period of time beginning at 00:00:01 hours on the first Day of a calendar month and ending at 24:00 hours on the last Day of the same calendar month. It is always stated in Colombian time.

 

Calendar Year: The period beginning at 00:00:01 hours on January first (1) of each year and ending December thirty-first (31) of the same year at 24:00 hours. It is always stated in Colombian time.

 

CENIT: CENIT Transporte y Logística de Hidrocarburos S.A.S., as identified at the beginning part of the Master Service Contract.

 

Claimant Party: Any of the Parties that are signatories to this Master Service Contract that brings a complaint or pertinent action to make good the indemnities.

 

Commencement Date: Either the date on which the commencement of the project is signed or the date expressly provided in the latter.

 

Competent Authority: Any entity or body, regardless of its nature, that is capable of issuing any type of law, regulation, judgment, award, decree, resolution, action, or capable of imparting instructions, whether for general or specific application, that are of obligatory compliance, or that has the capacity for applying the same.

 

Contracted Capacity: The total transport, storage and loading capacity that CENIT has contracted with its clients under the firm modality for a specific infrastructure and which shall be calculated in BPCD.

 

D

 

Date of Signing: The date on which this Master Service Contract is signed, indicating the commencement of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Day or Days: Calendar day or calendar days, respectively.

 

Declared Value of the Product : The individual value held by each Product as assessed at the time it is delivered to CENIT at the Point of Entry.

 

Delivery: The action by means of which a given volume of the Shipper’s Products are transferred to CENIT’s custody for transportation via the Polyduct.

 

For the other Services, this is the action by means of which a given volume of the Shipper’s Products are transferred to CENIT’s custody to be stored in tanks or when they are loaded in Ports.

 

Diluent: The natural or refined Product that is mixed with heavy Crude Oil to provide the crude oil with those quality specifications required for it to be effectively transported by each of the Oil Pipelines, so long as this Diluent can be transported by the Transport System.

 

41
 

 

For the other Services, this is the natural or refined Product that is mixed with heavy Crude Oil to provide the crude oil with those quality specifications required for it to be effectively stored in tanks, unloaded on Unloading Platforms, loaded into tank trucks or in Ports, so long as this Diluent can be stored or transported by CENIT infrastructure.

 

Duration of Validity: This shall have the meaning contained in Section 4.01 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

E

 

ECOPETROL: ECOPETROL S.A., as identified at the beginning part of the Master Service Contract.

 

ECOPETROL’s Contracted Capacity: The entire capacity committed by CENIT to ECOPETROL for the provision of the Services of the Master Service Contract by CENIT including the Firm Capacity and Additional Capacity modalities, which capacity shall be calculated in BPCD.

 

Effective Capacity: The maximum average transport capacity that is effectively available. It is calculated as a product of the Nominal Capacity multiplied by the Service Factor.

 

For other Services, this means the maximum average daily capacity that is effectively available. It is calculated as a product of the Nominal Capacity multiplied by the Service Factor.

 

Entry Points: Exact point in the Transport System, for storage, loading of tank trucks or Unloading in Ports at which CENIT takes custody of the Product delivered by ECOPETROL. These are described in Annex TP-5 of the Chapter on Product Transport Service, Annex AP-2 of the Chapter on Product Storage Service, Annex CPC-2 of the Chapter on Tank Truck Product Loading Service and Annex DPP-5 of the Chapter on Portside Product Unloading Services.

 

Exit Points: Exact point in the Transport System, for storage, loading of tank trucks or Unloading in Ports at which ECOPETROL receives the Product delivered by CENIT which thereby ceases to have custody of the Product. These are described in Annex TP-5 of the Chapter on Product Transport Service, Annex AP-2 of the Chapter on Product Storage Service, Annex CPC-2 of the Chapter on Tank Truck Product Loading Service and Annex DPP-5 of the Chapter on Portside Product Unloading Services.

 

F

 

Firm Capacity: The portion of ECOPETROL’s Contracted Capacity composed of the “Ship or Pay” and “Ship and Pay” modalities for each of the Services to which ECOPETROL is entitled by virtue of the Master Service Contract, calculated in BPCD.

 

Followup Committee: The committee established to track the execution of this Master Service Contract in accordance with the regulations established in Clause 9 of the General Conditions.

 

42
 

 

G

 

Gallon: One U.S. gallon or one of forty-two parts (1/42) of a Barrel.

 

General Conditions: The “GENERAL CONDITIONS” section of the Master Service Contract.

 

Gross Barrel: Product volume including dissolved water and water and sediment in suspension, but excluding free water and bottom sediments, calculated under standard conditions (60°F and 14.7 lbf/in 2 , or 15°C and 1.01325 bars).

 

I

 

Identifiable Losses: Loss of Products that can be traced to a specific point on the Polyduct and that can be attributed to specific events such as fractures, spills, force majeure or act of nature.

 

Indemnifying Party: Any of the Parties that are signatories to this Master Service Contract who are responsible for indemnifying the Claimant Party.

 

Information: Information classified as confidential in accordance with the regulations provided in Article 18 of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Interphase: The mix that occurs during normal operations of the Polyduct between adjacent batches of Products with different specifications.

 

Inventory in Transit: Part of the line fill corresponding to the volume of Product to be delivered to the Shipper.

 

J

 

Justified Event: Any instance of force majeure, act of nature, action by a third party or exclusive culpability of the victim and/or characteristic and inherent defects in the Product.

 

L

 

Line Fill: All Product volumes necessary to maintain the Polyducts in permanent operation.

 

The Line Fill includes but is not limited to non-pumpable resources in tanks and line fills for processing and machinery.

 

For the other Services, this refers to all Product volumes necessary to maintain the tanks, Unloading Platforms and Ports in permanent operation, including but not limited to non-pumpable resources in tanks and line fills for processing and machinery.

 

43
 

 

M

 

Marketing Rate: The financial compensation that ECOPETROL must pay CENIT for its marketing of ECOPETROL’s Temporary Capacity Release.

 

Master Service Contract: The General Conditions and their corresponding Chapters and Annexes.

 

Measurement Manual: The document that contains the General Conditions for the measurement of Products, which is attached as Annex TP-6 to Chapter I — Product Transport Service by Polyduct of this Master Service Contract.

 

Minimum Availability of Firm Capacity: The minimum availability value of ECOPETROL’s Firm Capacity required to guarantee CENIT’s infrastructure. It is calculated in accordance with the formula established in Section 3.03 of the General Conditions.

 

Monetary Conditions: Where applicable, refers to the tables or formulae used to calculate the surcharges and discounts applicable to the Transport Rate for commercial concepts.

 

N

 

Net Barrel: The Product volume excluding total water and total sediment, calculated under standard conditions (60°F and 14.7 lbf/in 2 , or 15°C and 1.01325 bars).

 

Nominal Capacity: The maximum transport capacity between a pumping station and a Polyduct terminal, or between two pumping stations, calculated on the basis of the equipment installed in a Polyduct and the amount of Product anticipated for a specific period. Expressed in BPOD.

 

For other Services, this means the maximum calculated capacity, calculated on the basis of the equipment installed in a Polyduct and the amount of Product anticipated for a specific period.

 

Nominated Quantity: The quantity of the Products that ECOPETROL requests be transported by the Transport System and that it allocates in the corresponding nomination.

 

Nomination: Request for Service for the Operational Month that specifies the volume of transport required, the Entry Point, the Exit Point and the Product being transported.

 

For the other Services, this refers to the corresponding request for Service that formalizes the Shipper for an Operational Month, that specifies the volume required for each tank and Platform, the Entry Point, the Exit Point, the Product and the ownership of the Products whose loading onto the tank trucks and/or unloading at the port is being requested.

 

44
 

 

O

 

Operating Storage: This is the amount of fuel necessary for efficient transport operations, which shall be maintained in the Transport System.

 

Operation and Maintenance Contract: Contract by means of which ECOPETROL will provide operating, maintenance and related services to infrastructure owned by CENIT.

 

Operational Decline: Alteration in the quality of Products during the provision of Product Transport Service owing to the mix of these as a result of the operation of the Transport System in Batches. Operational Decline does not imply a reduction in the total volume of product transported by the Transport System.

 

Operational Month: The Calendar Month for which ECOPETROL has nominated each of the Services and during which CENIT meets the Delivery and Receiving Schedule.

 

Owner’s Capacity: The capacity required by CENIT for a specific infrastructure in order to supplement its operational needs.

 

P

 

Party or Parties: CENIT or ECOPETROL, or both, depending on the context in which the term is used.

 

Permanent Capacity Release: ECOPETROL’s Firm Capacity released on a permanent basis in accordance with the regulations stated in Section 3.05 (ii) of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Platforms: All of the physical installations necessary for the loading of ECOPETROL Products onto tank trucks by virtue of the Master Service Contract.

 

Polyduct: All physical installations necessary for transporting the Product from a Point of Entry or a Point of Exit to the next Point of Exit including, among others, the piping, pumping units, measuring stations, control systems and storage capacity necessary for the operation of the Transport System.

 

Ports: The accumulation of physical elements including works, access canals, installations and services that under favorable circumstances permit the usage of a coastal or riverbank area for carrying out the loading and unloading of all types of ships and the transfer of property between land, maritime and/or river transportation. Within the port are port terminals, piers and wharves.

 

Portside Product Unloading Rate: The financial compensation that ECOPETROL must pay CENIT for the Portside Product Unloading Service.

 

Portside Product Unloading Service: The portside unloading service for ECOPETROL Products to be provided by CENIT to ECOPETROL, the regulations of which are contained in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, the Chapter on Chapter on Portside Product Unloading Service (Chapter IV) and its annexes.

 

45
 

 

Product Storage Rate: The financial compensation that ECOPETROL must pay CENIT for the Product Storage Service.

 

Product Storage Service: The storage service for ECOPETROL Products to be provided by CENIT to ECOPETROL, the regulations of which are contained in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, the Chapter on Product Storage Service (Chapter II) and its annexes.

 

Product Transport Rate: Single monetary value, per Barrel or Gallon, transported on a Trajectory and charged by CENIT to ECOPETROL in accordance with the provisions of the current regulations.

 

Product Transport Service: The transport service by Polyduct for ECOPETROL Products to be provided by CENIT to ECOPETROL, the regulations of which are contained in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, the Chapter on Product Transport Service (Chapter I) and its annexes.

 

Products: These are any liquid fuels derived from petroleum and classifiable within the categories of gasolines, kerosenes and including aviation fuels (avgas), regular and extra engine gasoline, aviation fuels for turbofan engines, kerosene, diesel extra or low sulfur, regular diesel to meet current Colombian quality standards, marine diesel (also known as gas oil, intersol, diesel No. 2), diesel and its mixtures with biofuels in accordance with current standards, naphtha and diluent.

 

Property: The infrastructure and/or assets transferred by ECOPETROL to CENIT at the time of the transfer of assets covered in the Asset Contribution Contract .

 

Prudent Industry Practices: The practices generally applied by an experienced and prudent operator and maintainer of Hydrocarbon transport infrastructure in the United States of America, adapted where necessary for the development of operations in Colombia for climatological, topographic, public order and socio-environmental reasons, and in view of the known condition of the infrastructure.

 

Q

 

Quality Specifications: The quality specifications that the Product must have in order for the Services to be carried out, as described in Annex TP-1 of the Product Transport Service Chapter.

 

Quantity Delivered: Total quantity of the Products that ECOPETROL delivers to the Entry Points of the Transport System. This quantity is calculated not by taking each Individual Product amount into consideration but by taking all the Products together.

 

46
 

 

Quantity Received: Total quantity of the Products that ECOPETROL takes at the Exit Points of the Transport System. This quantity is calculated not by taking each Individual Product amount into consideration but by taking all the Products together.

 

R

 

Reasonable Steps: Those reasonable and timely measures as a provider of full Product transport, storage and loading Services is able to take given the demands of the business and Prudent Industry Practices in order to avoid injury or the aggravation of the same.

 

Regulations on Port Operations: Document that regulates the relationship between the Shippers and CENIT in order to ensure the best, safest and most timely provision of Port Services together with the fulfillment of related operations, approved by the Ministry of Transportation, together with its amendments and additions.

 

S

 

Scheduled Capacity: The portion of the Effective Transport Capacity of the Polyduct that is allocated to each Shipper or Third Party requesting Product Transport Service by means of the Delivery and Receiving Schedule, in accordance with the provisions of this Master Service Contract.

 

For the other Services, this refers to the portion of the Effective Capacity allocated to each Shipper or Third Party requesting the service in question.

 

Scheduling of Deliveries and Receipts: The scheduling of Polyduct operations for an Operational Month prepared by CENIT on the basis of the transport Nomination cycle.

 

For the other Services, this refers to the operation schedule for tanks, Loading of tank trucks and Portside Unloading of Products for an Operational Month prepared by CENIT on the basis of the transport Nomination cycle.

 

Service Factor: The percentage of the Nominal Capacity that can effectively be used owing to restrictions of a temporary operational nature and those connected with the maintenance of the Polyduct and its related and complementary installations, calculated for a specific period during which consideration should be made of the effects of the non-availability of mechanical equipment, line maintenance schedules and the number of days involved.

 

47
 

 

For the other Services, this is the percentage of the Nominal Capacity that can effectively be used owing to restrictions of a temporary operational nature and those connected with the maintenance of tanks, Platforms and their related and complementary installations, calculated for a specific period during which consideration should be made of the effects of the non-availability of mechanical equipment, line maintenance schedules and the number of days involved.

 

Service Rates: Jointly, the Product Transport Rate, the Product Storage Rate, the Tank Truck Product Loading Rate and the Portside Product Unloading Rate, which will be defined and updated under the terms provided in the regulations, and failing this, by the provisions of this Contract.

 

Services: Jointly, the Product Transport Service, the Product Storage Service, the Tank Truck Product Loading Service and the Portside Product Unloading Service.

 

Ship and Pay: The modality under which part of the Firm Capacity is committed and by virtue of which ECOPETROL is obliged to pay a Service Rate solely for those volumes actually used within the aforementioned capacity.

 

Ship or Pay: The modality under which part of the Firm Capacity is committed and by virtue of which ECOPETROL is obliged to pay a Service Rate solely for the volume committed regardless of whether the aforementioned capacity was used or not.

 

Shipper: Party that contracts a service and signs an agreement relating to any Services with CENIT. It is understood that the Shipper acts as owner of the Product to be transported, stored and loaded onto tank trucks unless otherwise specified. For the purposes of this Contract, ECOPETROL is understood as being a Shipper.

 

Shipper Balance: The Volumetric Balance for each of the clients to which CENIT provides Services.

 

Shipper’s Installations: Refers to all the installations necessary to connect ECOPETROL with CENIT’s infrastructure.

 

Storage Installations: The physical installations in the care of CENIT that are constructed and operated on land and are required for the storage, handling and dispatching of Liquid Fuels; for the purposes of this Contract, the Storage Installations shall be those indicated in Chapter II — Product Storage Service.

 

Strategic Inventory: Inventory of fuels used to replenish different operational events that could jeopardize the storage of Products.

 

T

 

Tank Truck Product Loading Rate: The financial compensation that ECOPETROL must pay CENIT for the Tank Truck Product Loading Service.

 

Tank Truck Product Loading Service: The tank truck product loading service for ECOPETROL to be provided by CENIT to ECOPETROL, the regulations of which are contained in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, the Chapter on Tank Truck Product Loading Service (Chapter III) and its annexes.

 

Temporary Capacity Release: ECOPETROL’s Firm Capacity released on a temporary basis in accordance with the regulations stated in Section 3.05 (ii) of the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract.

 

Theft: Those quantities of Product illegally removed from the Transport System by third parties during the provision of Transport Service.

 

Third Party: Any person alien to this Master Service Contract.

 

48
 

 

Trajectory: The part of the Polyduct encompassing a Point of Entry and a Point of Exit and which must have a Product Transport Rate.

 

Transport Contract: The meeting of minds formalized in writing between the Transporter and a Shipper whose purpose is or includes the transport of Products by Polyduct.

 

For the purposes of this document, the Parties understand that the Transport Contract includes the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract and Chapter I on the Transport of Products of ECOPETROL.

 

Transport System: The accumulation of Polyducts owned by CENIT.

 

Transporter: The person that provides transportation service via Polyducts. For the purposes of this Contract this will be CENIT, as identified at the beginning part of the Master Service Contract.

 

Transporter’s Manual: Document containing information together with CENIT’s operational and administrative procedures aimed at regulating the operation of the Transport System, and attached as Annex TP-3 to Chapter I — Product Transport Service by Polyduct of this Master Service Contract.

 

U

 

Unidentifiable Losses: Ordinary losses inherent in the operation of the Services, including among others:

 

· Mixing.
· Drainage.
· Undetected illegal extraction.
· Failures in the factors of the measuring devices.
· Volumetric contraction.
· Escapes/leaks from the valves.
· Evaporation.
· Minor leaks.
· Uncertainties inherent in the measuring systems and related instruments.
· Uncertainties inherent in the bar tree analysis associated with the liquidation of volumes.
· Development of uncertainties inherent in procedures established at international level to determine volumes by static and dynamic measurement.

 

Unused Capacity: The unused Effective Capacity, consisting of the sum of: (i) the Available Capacity, (ii) the unused Owner’s Capacity and (iii) the unused Contracted Capacity (scheduled but neither used nor nominated).

 

49
 

 

V

 

Volumetric Balance: The operational balancing that CENIT will perform at the end of each Operational Month for the purpose of establishing the various Product amounts handled for each of the Services, and for determining and distributing Identifiable Losses and Unidentifiable Losses together with Product Theft.

 

W

 

Withdrawal: The action by which CENIT returns to the Shipper or any party appointed by the latter a volume of Products at the Point of Exit, thereby surrendering custody.

 

Working Day: Every day of the week with the exception of Sundays and non-working days in accordance with Colombian law. Days shall be understood as calendar days in this Contract unless it is explicitly stated that these are Working Days.

 

[ SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ]

 

50
 

 

  Master Service Contract for Products
Chapter I – Product Transport Service by Polyduct
 

 

Chapter I

Product Transport Service by Polyduct

 

In addition to the terms contained in the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, the Parties agree that the Product Transport Service will be governed by the following,

 

CLAUSES

 

Clause 1 Scope of Service

 

Section 1.01

This Chapter and its Annexes govern the special conditions for the provision of the Ecopetrol Product Transport Service in accordance with the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

Section 1.02

In particular, it will cover:

 

(i) The use of the capacity of the Colorados-Galán Wells Line, as stipulated in Annex TP-5 of This Chapter.

 

(a) In the event that the Competent Authority determines the use of the capacity associated with the Continuity Margin, ECOPETROL must release said capacity, a situation that will reduce the Contracted Capacity of ECOPETROL, notwithstanding the provisions of subsection a, number (ii) of Section 3.05 of the Master Service Contract.

 

(b) In the event of the foregoing, the Released Capacity shall be deducted from the Firm Capacity in the “Ship or Pay” method of ECOPETROL.

 

(ii) The Diluent Firm Capacity between Galán and the Diluent consumption sites located in Apiay and Tocancipá, in accordance with the provisions of Annex TP-5 of This Chapter, notwithstanding the provisions of subsection a, number (ii) of Section 3.05 of the Master Service Contract.

 

As for the Sutamarchán-Tocancipá line, the Parties understand that priority will be given to the supply of diesel and gasoline at the Tocancipá Terminal and the handling of Diluent at this Terminal, once the project of suspension of pumping to Puente Aranda begins, will be contingent upon the operational ability of handling more than two (2) Products in the Sutamarchán-Tocancipá trajectory and at the Tocancipá Terminal.

 

(iii) Regarding the National Network of Polyducts, included in Annex TP-2 of this Chapter and excluding the Colorados-Galán Wells line, and in order to maintain the Strategic Inventory, ECOPETROL and CENIT undertake to jointly reserve a capacity of up to five thousand barrels per day (5,000 BPCD).

 

51
 

 

(a) Regarding this capacity, ECOPETROL will not pay the “Ship or Pay” Rate, provided that it involves Operations for the replacement and rotation of Strategic Inventories. It is understood that the Product Transport Service Rate is assumed by another Shipper other than ECOPETROL, when the inventories are released in its favor.

 

(b) When circumstances warrant, CENIT may make use of a greater capacity than that described in the preceding paragraph in order to address unplanned events, and it may even reach agreements with other agents that have firm contracted capacity.

 

CENIT may make use of part of the Strategic Inventory of ECOPETROL, after agreement by the Parties regarding the procedure applicable to such use, which will be incorporated as Annex TP-7  once the parties reach an agreement, within a term not exceeding three (3) months from the date of completion of this Master Service Contract.

 

Section 1.03 Description of the Product Transport Service

CENIT undertakes to provide to ECOPETROL, regarding the ECOPETROL Products that are listed and delivered within the Contracted Capacity of ECOPETROL, the following services, including:

 

(i) Receive and accept the Product Nominations from ECOPETROL, according to the requirements of ECOPETROL up to the Firm Capacity of ECOPETROL and in accordance with the applicable rules set forth in this Agreement and in accordance with Annex TP-5 of this Chapter on Product Transport.

 

(ii) Receive at each Entry Point the ECOPETROL Product that meets the Quality Specifications of Annex TP-1 of this Chapter on Product Transport.

 

(iii) Transport, preserve, store and decant the ECOPETROL Product through each one of the Polyducts specified in Annex TP-2 and up to each Exit Point, in accordance with the Nominations made by ECOPETROL and accepted by CENIT.

 

(iv) Make available to ECOPETROL, at each Exit Point, the ECOPETROL Product.

 

(v) Carry out all activities related to the Product Transport Service of this Chapter in a coordinated fashion with other operators that provide services of an equal or similar nature to CENIT and that may be needed to meet ECOPETROL Product evaluation requirements (if applicable).

 

Clause 2 Product Transport Rate

 

ECOPETROL shall pay to CENIT the Product Transport Rates listed in Annex TP-4 . The Product Transport Rates listed in said annex correspond to the rates in effect for 2013, which will be updated in accordance with the provisions of the Master Service Contract or in regulations when there is a ruling in this regard. In any case, ECOPETROL shall pay to CENIT the amount of the provision of the Product Transport Service in the Firm Capacity under the “Ship or Pay” method in accordance with the provisions of this Master Service Contract.

 

52
 

 

Clause 3 Contractual limits of liability of CENIT

 

For the purposes of the provisions of Section 16.02 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, in situations of loss or damage of ECOPETROL Product during the Product Transport Service, the following contractual limit of liability shall be taken into account:

 

(i) For consequential damages, CENIT shall pay compensation equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the Declared Value of the Product for each lost or damaged Barrel.

 

(ii) For lost profits, CENIT shall pay compensation equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the Declared Value of the Product for each lost or damaged Barrel.

 

(iii) These limits of liability will not apply in the event of fraud or gross negligence of CENIT.

 

Clause 4 Additional Obligations of the Parties

 

Notwithstanding the provisions of Clause 8 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, the Parties shall have the following Obligations:

 

Section 4.01 CENIT

 

(i) Authorize the Product Transport Service in the Nominated Quantity, provided that this is equal to or less than the Firm Capacity, and issue the corresponding Delivery and Receiving Schedule in accordance with the provisions of this Master Service Contract.

 

(ii) Receive the full amount of the Products delivered by ECOPETROL or its designee, at the Entry Points, provided that ECOPETROL complies with the Delivery and Receiving Schedule and the Quality Specifications of the Products.

 

(iii) Transport and deliver to ECOPETROL at the Exit Points, the Delivered Quantity, discounting the Identifiable and Unidentifiable Losses and Thefts.

 

(iv) Maintain the Quality Specifications of the Products delivered by ECOPETROL in accordance with the provisions contained in Annex TP-1, except for variations in quality of the Products produced as a result of Operational Decline.

 

(v) Measure the Quantity Delivered and Quantity Received and verify the quality of the Products at the Entry and Exit Points. This notwithstanding ECOPETROL’s obligation to verify the quality of the Products that it delivers to CENIT for those cases in which the same correspond to imported Product.

 

53
 

 

(vi) Process the claims filed by ECOPETROL in a timely manner, within the terms established herein.

 

(vii) Others that arise from this Agreement or regulations in effect.

 

(viii) Perform Volumetric Balance and Shipper Balance applicable to ECOPETROL in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.

 

Section 4.02 ECOPETROL

 

(i) Provide nominations to CENIT of the Quantities of Products required to be transported in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter.

 

(ii) Deliver, directly or through a party designated for such purpose, the Authorized Quantity to CENIT at the Entry Points, in accordance with the Delivery and Receiving Schedule. The Product delivered to CENIT must meet the Product Quality Specifications in accordance with the provisions of Annex TP-1.

 

(iii) Receive the Authorized Quantity at the Exit Points, in accordance with the Delivery and Receiving Schedule.

 

(iv) Perform, at its own expense and risk, the preventive and corrective maintenance and operation of the Shipper’s Installations in accordance with the provisions of the Transporter’s Manual, and in the absence thereof, with Prudent Industry Practices.

 

(v) Process and keep up to date each and every one of the permits, licenses or authorizations required by the Competent Authorities for the proper operation and functioning of the Shipper’s Installations.

 

(vi) Provide to CENIT, at the proper time, all information that may be useful and necessary for the performance of the Agreement so that CENIT may conduct its business in a timely, dynamic and effective manner.

 

(vii) Others that arise from this Agreement or regulations in effect.

 

Clause 5 Nomination.

 

Section 5.01

ECOPETROL must prepare the Nomination for CENIT of the quantities of Products required to be transported through the Transport System in accordance with the Nomination Procedure issued by CENIT.

 

54
 

 

Section 5.02

ECOPETROL may nominate quantities of Products in addition to the Firm Capacity, which may be accepted by CENIT if there is Available Capacity in the Transport System, notwithstanding the provisions in Section 2.03 (ii) subsection b.

 

Section 5.03

The foregoing is notwithstanding the procedure that the parties agree to for the handling of Strategic Inventories.

 

Clause 6 Authorization, Delivery and Receipt.

 

(i) CENIT shall inform ECOPETROL of the Authorized Quantity in accordance with the Nomination Procedure.

 

(ii) CENIT shall prepare in a discretionary manner the Delivery and Receiving Schedule, to the extent possible, to adapt its operations to the needs expressed by ECOPETROL for the scheduling of Deliveries. In any case, compliance with the deliveries will be measured in accordance with the cycles defined in the Nomination Procedure.

 

Section 6.02

The Product Transport Service of this agreement includes managing inventories in an Operational Storage method, in accordance with the operational needs of CENIT.

 

Clause 7 Quality of the Products.

 

Section 7.01 Quality of Products delivered by ECOPETROL

If the Products delivered by ECOPETROL do not meet the Quality Specifications of Products stipulated in Annex TP-1 , CENIT will notify ECOPETROL of the deficiency in quality and may reject them or ask ECOPETROL to pay the costs required for transporting the Products outside of the Quality Specifications, in which case the Parties must agree on the costs beforehand. This is notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6.01 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

Section 7.02 Quality of Products delivered by CENIT

Except for the variations in quality of the Products produced as a result of Operational Decline, if the quality conditions of the Products delivered by CENIT at the Exit Point do not meet the quality specifications of Annex TP-1 , ECOPETROL may reject the Products and ask CENIT to pay the damages resulting from the change in quality of the Products during the Product Transport Service, without exceeding the limit of liability stipulated in Clause 3 of this Chapter. The Parties may agree whether or not damaged Product forms part of the compensation.

 

55
 

 

ECOPETROL acknowledges and accepts that the Product Transport Service, given the operation by Batches, generates Transmix and changes in the quality of the Products at the Exit point in relation to the quality that they had at the Entry point. The Parties agree that they will assume what corresponds to each one in the provisions defined by the Competent Authority with regard to handling transmix and Operational Decline and shall make the corresponding adjustments to this Master Service Contract, Chapters and Annexes hereto.

 

Clause 8 Ownership of the Products.

 

ECOPETROL warrants that it holds the unencumbered title of ownership of the Products, as well as the right to transfer possession of the Products, or to transfer them for its account to CENIT at the Entry Points. ECOPETROL shall release CENIT from any liability and indemnify it and against any claim, legal action, or damages that may result from lawsuits or claims by third parties that dispute the ownership of the Products that are transported.

 

Section 8.01

At the Entry Points, CENIT will merely receive possession of the Products, whereby ECOPETROL will continue to hold ownership of the Products while they are transported through the Transport System. CENIT will exercise custody over the Products under the terms and conditions of this Master Service Contract and applicable legislation, from the time at which it receives them at the Entry Points until ECOPETROL takes them at the Exit Points.

 

Section 8.02 Balances

CENIT shall perform a balance between the total quantities of Products received by CENIT to be transported through the Transport System and the total quantities of Product delivered to the Shippers once the Product Transport Service is completed, within each Operational Month, with the purpose of establishing the Identifiable and Non-Identifiable Losses, Operational Decline and Theft (the “Volumetric Balance”). Once the Volumetric Balance is performed, CENIT shall determine on a pro-rated basis the percentage represented of the quantities of ECOPETROL Products against the total quantities of Products received by CENIT to be transported through the Transport System in the respective Operational Month, the percentage of the Identifiable and Unidentifiable Losses, Thefts and Operational Decline established in the Volumetric Balance that corresponds to ECOPETROL to assume (the “Shipper Balance” applicable to ECOPETROL).

 

Clause 9 Measuring

 

Section 9.01 Transitional System

For purposes of this Chapter, the Parties agree that the measuring will be governed by the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual during the first year counted from the Date of Signature. From that time, the measuring will be governed by the CENIT Measurement Manual, and CENIT must guarantee that it complies with the Prudent Industry Practices, and in particular the API Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards.

 

56
 

 

ECOPETROL will send to CENIT the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual within the first five (5) Days following the Date of Signature.

 

Section 9.02

The Parties agree that for purposes of this Chapter, the dynamic methodology for measurement will apply, in accordance with the Quality Specifications of the Product and the Measurement Manual incorporated into this Master Service Contract in Annex TP-6 or the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual, as applicable pursuant to Section 9.01 of this Chapter.

 

Section 9.03

CENIT undertakes to keep dynamic meters at the Entry and Exit Points of the Property during the entire life of the Master Service Contract.

 

Section 9.04 Backup Measuring

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 9.02 of this Chapter, in the cases when for some reason the dynamic measuring methodology cannot be applied, the Parties understand that the static measuring methodology must be applied, in accordance with the Product Quality Specifications and the Measurement Manual incorporated into this Master Service Contract in Annex TP-6 or the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual, as applicable in accordance with Section 9.01 of this Chapter.

 

Section 9.05

Differences that arise between the Parties during the dynamic measurement or static measurement shall be resolved pursuant to the procedures set forth in Clause 23 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

Clause 10 Procedures and Regulations Applicable to the Transport Service

 

The procedures and regulations indicated below, which form an integral part of this Master Service Contract as annexes, constitute the rules governing the conditions of operation and Product Transport Service of ECOPETROL. The aspects contained in the General Conditions of the Master Services Agreement and this Chapter shall prevail over the conditions established in the annexes to this Chapter. The procedures and regulations are:

 

(i) Quality Specifications , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TP-1 .

 

(ii) Polyducts , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TP-2.

 

(iii) CENIT Transporter’s Manual , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TP-3 .

 

(iv) Product Transport Rates per Polyduct , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TP-4 .

 

57
 

 

(v) ECOPETROL Contracted Capacity per Polyduct , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TP-5 .

 

(vi) CENIT Measurement Manual , incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TP-6 .

 

(vii) Conditions of use of the Strategic Inventory, incorporated into this Master Service Contract as Annex TP-7.

 

[ SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ]

 

58
 

 

ECOPETROL – CENIT

  Master Service Contract for Products
Chapter III – Tank Truck Product Loading Service
 

 

Chapter II

Product Storage Service

 

In addition to the terms contained in the General Conditions of this Master Service Contract, the Parties agree that the Product Storage Service will be governed by the following:

 

CLAUSES

 

Clause 1 Scope of Service

 

Section 1.01

This Chapter and its annexes govern the special conditions for the provision of the Ecopetrol Product Storage Service in accordance with the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

This chapter will not apply to Operational Storage except for those at the Colorados Wells Terminal.

 

In the event that the Competent Authority determines the use of the capacity associated with the Continuity Margin, ECOPETROL must release said capacity, a situation that will reduce the Contracted Capacity of ECOPETROL, notwithstanding the provisions of subsection a, number (ii) of Section 3.05 of the Master Service Contract.

 

In the event of the foregoing, the Released Capacity shall be deducted from the Firm Capacity in the “Ship or Pay” method of ECOPETROL.

 

Section 1.02 Description of the Service

 

(i) On providing the ECOPETROL Product Storage Service within the infrastructure defined in Annex AP-1 of this Chapter, CENIT undertakes to:

 

(a) Receive the ECOPETROL Product for storage thereof up to the Firm Capacity set forth in Annex AP-2 at the Entry Point, in exchange for the payment of remuneration, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Chapter.

 

(b) Store, preserve and maintain the ECOPETROL Product.

 

(c) Deliver to ECOPETROL or its designee the ECOPETROL Product at the Exit Points.

 

Clause 2 Storage Service Rates

 

The rates that ECOPETROL will pay to CENIT for the provision of the Product Storage Service will be those set forth in Annex AP-3 .

 

59
 

 

Clause 3 Contractual Liability Limits of CENIT

 

For the purposes of the provisions of Section 16.02 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, in situations of loss or damage of ECOPETROL Product during the Product Transport Service, the following contractual limit of liability shall be taken into account:

 

(i) For consequential damages, CENIT shall pay compensation equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the Declared Value of the Product for each lost or damaged Barrel.

 

(ii) For lost profits, CENIT shall pay compensation equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the Declared Value of the Product for each lost or damaged Barrel.

 

(iii) These limits of liability shall not apply in the event of fraud or gross negligence of CENIT.

 

Clause 4 Additional Obligations of the Parties

 

Notwithstanding the provisions of Clause 8 of the General Conditions of the Master Service Contract, the Parties shall have the following Obligations:

 

Section 4.01 CENIT
(i) Make available to ECOPETROL the Firm Capacity detailed in Annex AP-2 during the life of this Master Service Contract.

 

(ii) Receive the ECOPETROL Product at the Entry Point and deposit it at the Storage Installations up to the Firm Capacity and in accordance with the Delivery and Receiving Schedule and at the Tanker receiving Windows.

 

(iii) Allow the withdrawal of the Product, under the terms set forth in this Master Service Contract and in this Chapter.

 

(iv) Preserve the quality conditions of the Product in accordance with the terms of this Master Service Contract. The foregoing is notwithstanding ECOPETROL’s obligation to verify the quality of the Products that it delivers to CENIT for those cases in which the same correspond to imported Product.

 

(v) Others that arise from this Agreement or regulations in effect.

 

Section 4.02 ECOPETROL
(i) Deliver the Product at the Entry Point in compliance with the Quality Specifications set forth in Annex TP-1 to Chapter 1—Product Transport Service by Polyduct.

 

(ii) Send the scheduled Tanker receiving windows to CENIT.

 

(iii) Maintain its status as importer/refiner.

 

60
 

 

(iv) Comply with current regulations and any others issued in the future by the Competent Colombian Authority for customs processes of Clearance, Release and Nationalization of Product when the same proceeds from imports carried out by ECOPETROL.

 

(v) Comply with the Product Rotation Cycles at the Storage Installations so as to preserve the quality of the product.

 

(vi) Others that arise from this Agreement or regulations in effect.

 

Clause 5 Authorization, Delivery and Receipt.

 

The receipt, storage and delivery of the Product by CENIT and the corresponding delivery and pickup of the Product by ECOPETROL, shall be subject to the following rules:

 

Section 5.01 Product Storage.

 

During Storage, CENIT will perform the following tasks:

 

(i) It will store the product exclusively at the Storage Installations for the entire time it is rendering Product Storage Services, unless CENIT requests express permission to store the Product at other facilities and ECOPETROL grants said permission.

 

(ii) CENIT may store the product at other facilities in the event of a Justifiable Event.

 

(iii) ECOPETROL, through its authorized employees, may verify that its Product is in fact stored at the Storage Installations at any time, provided it coordinates the visit with CENIT and complies with the HSE rules.

 

(iv) Product Storage Services shall cease to be provided once the product enters the Transportation System at the Entry Point.

 

Section 5.02 Delivery and Withdrawal Reports

CENIT will send ECOPETROL a detailed report of the movements and inventory of ECOPETROL’s Product stored in the Storage Installations.

 

Clause 6 Product Quality

 

Section 6.01 Contamination.

CENIT shall ensure adherence to the ECOPETROL’s Product Quality Specifications, which must remain within the Quality Control Specifications found in Annex TP-1 to Chapter I – Product Transport Service by Polyduct, preventing any contamination.

 

61
 

 

In any event, CENIT shall not be required to deliver the product with higher Product Quality Specifications than those received. In the event of a contamination due to improper handling of the Product by CENIT at the Storage Installations, CENIT shall compensate ECOPETROL for any damages this situation may have caused, unless they are the result of a Justifiable Event, or an action or omission on the part of ECOPETROL.

 

Section 6.02 Failure to meet Product Quality Specifications on the part of ECOPETROL

In the event the product delivered by ECOPETROL at the Entry Point fails to meet the Quality Control Specifications found in Annex TP-1 to Chapter I – Product Transport Service by Polyduct, CENIT will notify it of said quality deficiency and may reject it or request that ECOPETROL to pay the cost of storing the Product that failed to meet the Quality Specifications.

 

In any case, in the event that this causes CENIT to store quantities less than the Firm Capacity, CENIT shall have the right to receive full payment of the agreed-upon price for storage of the Firm Capacity.

 

Section 6.03 ECOPETROL Liability

ECOPETROL shall be liable to CENIT and any third party for any damages they may suffer as a result of the fact that the Product delivered by ECOPETROL at the Entry Point failed to meet the Quality Specifications or any applicable standards.

 

Clause 7 Product Ownership.

 

ECOPETROL warrants that it is the free and clear owner of the Product, with the right to transfer possession of the Product, or have it transferred on its behalf, to CENIT at the Entry Point. ECOPETROL shall indemnify and hold CENIT harmless from and against any claims, legal action or damages that may result from any claims filed by third parties disputing the ownership of the stored Product.

 

The foregoing is notwithstanding ECOPETROL’s obligation to comply with all regulations currently in effect or which may be issued in the future by any Competent Authority for Customs Release and Clearance of the Product in the case of Product imported by ECOPETROL.

 

Section 7.01

CENIT will receive at the Entry Point the mere possession of the Product, and as such ECOPETROL will retain ownership rights over the Product while it is being stored at the Storage Installations. CENIT shall have custody of the Product under the terms and conditions of this Contract and applicable law, from the time it is received at the Entry Point until ECOPETROL removes it as established in this Contract.

 

62
 

 

Clause 8 Measurement

 

Section 8.01 Transitional System

The parties agree that for purposes of this Chapter, measurement shall be governed by the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual for the first year, commencing with the Date of Signature. After said time, measurement shall be governed by the CENIT Measurement Manual, which shall guarantee compliance with Prudent Industry Practices and specifically with the API Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards.

 

ECOPETROL shall send CENIT a copy of the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual within five (5) days of the Date of Signature.

 

Section 8.02

The Parties agree that for purposes of this Chapter, the dynamic measurement methodology shall be used in accordance with the Product Quality Specifications and the Measurement Manual attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex TP-6 of Chapter I Product Transport Service by Polyduct or the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual, as applicable, in accordance with Section 8.01 of this Chapter.

 

Section 8.03

CENIT agrees to keep dynamic measurement modules at the Points of Entry and Points of Exit of the Property during the time the Master Service Contract is in effect.

 

Section 8.04 Backup Measurement

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 9.02 of this Chapter, in cases in which the dynamic measurement methodology cannot be used for some reason, the Parties agree that static measurement methodology shall be used, in accordance with the Product Quality Specifications and the Measurement Manual attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex TP-6 of Chapter I Product Transport Service by Polyduct or the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual, as applicable, in accordance with Section 8.01 of this Chapter.

 

Section 8.05

Any disputes that may arise between the Parties involving dynamic or static measurement shall be settled in accordance with the procedures established in Clause 23 of the Master Service Contract General Terms and Conditions.

 

Clause 9 Procedures and Regulations Applicable to the Storage Service

 

The procedures and regulations listed below, which are incorporated into this Master Service Contract as an annex, shall be the rules governing the operating and ECOPETROL Product Storage Service terms and conditions. The points covered in the General Terms and Conditions of the Master Service Contract and this Chapter shall prevail over any terms and conditions set forth in the annexes to this Chapter. The procedures and regulations are as follows:

 

(i) Storage Installations , attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex AP-1

 

(ii) ECOPETROL Contracted Storage Capacity , attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex AP-2

 

(iii) Storage Service Rates , attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex AP-3

 

63
 

 

[ SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ]

 

64
 

 

  Master Service Contract for Products
Chapter IV – Portside Product Unloading Service
 

 

Chapter III

tank truck product loading service

 

In addition to the terms and conditions listed in the General Terms and Conditions of the Master Service Contract, the Parties agree that the Product Loading onto ECOPETROL Tank Truck Service shall be governed by the following

 

CLAUSES

 

Clause 1 Scope of Service

 

Section 1.01

This Chapter and its Annexes shall govern the terms and conditions specific to the provision of the ECOPETROL Tank Truck Product Loading Service in accordance with the General Terms and Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

For the purpose of addressing unforeseen events, CENIT will reserve capacity of up to six thousand Barrels per day (6,000 BPCD):

 

(i) With regard to the capacity CENIT shall reserve, when it must be used by ECOPETROL, it will be under the “Ship and Pay” modality, provided it involves Strategic Inventory replacement and rotation operations.

 

(ii) When circumstances so require, CENIT may use more capacity than that described in the above paragraph to address unforeseen events and may even reach agreements with other agents who have firm contracted capacity.

 

Section 1.02 Description of the Service

CENIT agrees to provide ECOPETROL, in relation to ECOPETROL’s Products, services including but not limited to the following:

 

(i) Place ECOPETROL’s Product at ECOPETROL’s disposal at each of the Platforms listed in Annex CPC-1 to this Chapter.

 

(ii) Receive and accept Product Nominations from ECOPETROL, in accordance with ECOPETROL’s requirements and the rules governing ECOPETROL Contracted Capacity set forth in Annex CPC-2 .

 

(iii) Deliver ECOPETROL’s Product at every Platform that meets the Quality Specifications set forth in Annex TP-1 to Chapter I – Product Transport Service by Polyduct of this Chapter. The foregoing notwithstanding ECOPETROL’s obligation to verify the quality of the Products it delivers to CENIT in the case of imported Product.

 

(iv) Take custody of and transfer ECOPETROL’s Product at each of the Platforms in accordance with the Nominations made by ECOPETROL and accepted by CENIT.

 

65
 

 

  Master Service Contract for Products
Chapter IV – Portside Product Unloading Service
 

 

Clause 2 Rates for Loading Product onto Tank Trucks

 

The rates to be paid by ECOPETROL to CENIT for providing the Tank Truck Product Loading Service shall be those agreed upon and listed in Annex CPC-3 .

 

Clause 3 Limitation of CENIT’s Contractual Liability

 

For the effects of the provisions of Section 16.02 of the General Terms and Conditions of the Master Service Contract, in the event of loss or damage to ECOPETROL’s Product as result of the Product Transportation Service, the following contractual liability limitations shall apply:

 

(i) For actual damage, CENIT shall pay compensation equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the Declared Value of the Product for each Barrel lost or damaged.

 

(ii) For lost profits, CENIT shall pay compensation equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the Declared Value of the Product for each Barrel lost or damaged.

 

(iii) These compensation limits shall not apply in the event of fraud or gross negligence on the part of CENIT.

 

Clause 4 Measurement

 

Section 4.01 Transitional System

The parties agree that for purposes of this Chapter, measurement shall be governed by the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual for the first year, counted as of the Date of Signature. After said time, measurement shall be governed by the CENIT Measurement Manual, which shall guarantee compliance with Prudent Industry Practices and specifically with the API Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards.

 

ECOPETROL shall send CENIT a copy of the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual within five (5) days of the Date of Signature.

 

Section 4.02

The Parties agree that for purposes of this Chapter, the dynamic measurement methodology shall be used in accordance with the Product Quality Specifications and the Measurement Manual attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex TP-6 of Chapter I Product Transport Service by Polyduct or the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual, as applicable, in accordance with Section 4.01 of this Chapter.

 

Section 4.03

CENIT agrees to keep dynamic measurement modules at the Points of Entry and Points of Exit of the Property during the time the Master Service Contract is in effect.

 

Section 4.04 Backup Measurement

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4.02 of this Chapter, in cases in which the dynamic measurement methodology cannot be used for some reason, the Parties agree that static measurement methodology shall be used, in accordance with the Product Quality Specifications and the Measurement Manual attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex TP-6 of Chapter I Product Transport Service by Polyduct or the ECOPETROL Measurement Manual, as applicable, in accordance with Section 4.01 of this Chapter.

 

66
 

 

  Master Service Contract for Products
Chapter IV – Portside Product Unloading Service
 

 

Section 4.05

Any disputes that may arise between the Parties involving dynamic or static measurement shall be settled in accordance with the procedures established in Clause 23 of the Master Service Contract General Terms and Conditions.

 

Clause 5 Platform Hours and Operations

 

The provisions of the Loading and Operation Regulations attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex CPC-4 shall apply.

 

Clause 6 Procedures and Regulations applicable to the Tank Truck Product Loading Service

 

The procedures and regulations governing the Tank Truck Product Loading Service shall be those periodically agreed upon between the Parties. The General Terms and Conditions of the Master Service Contract and this Chapter shall prevail over any terms and conditions established in the Annexes to this Chapter.

 

(i) Platforms , attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex CPC-1

 

(ii) ECOPETROL Contracted Capacity per Platform , attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex CPC-2

 

(iii) Rates for Tank Truck Product Loading Service , attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex CPC-3

 

(iv) Loading and Operation Rules, attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex CPC-4

 

[ THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ]

 

67
 

 

  Master Service Contract for Products
Chapter IV – Portside Product Unloading Service
 

 

Chapter IV

Chapter on Portside Product Unloading

 

In addition to the terms and conditions listed in the General Terms and Conditions of the Master Service Contract, the Parties agree that the Portside Product Unloading Service shall be governed by the following

CLAUSES

 

Clause 1 Scope of Portside Product Unloading Service

 

Section 1.01

This Chapter and its annexes shall govern the terms and conditions specific to the provision of the Service of Unloading ECOPETROL Products at Ports in accordance with the General Terms and Conditions of the Master Service Contract.

 

Section 1.02 Description of the Portside Product Unloading Service

CENIT agrees to provide ECOPETROL, in relation to ECOPETROL’s Products delivered to CENIT by ECOPETROL, services including but not limited to the following:

 

(i) Receive ECOPETROL’s Products arriving at the Ports in tanker ships or any other means of transportation, provided the infrastructure exists to receive them. The foregoing notwithstanding ECOPETROL’s obligation to comply with all regulations currently in effect or which may be issued in the future by any Competent Authority for Customs Release and Clearance of the Product in the case of Product imported by ECOPETROL.

 

(ii) Guarantee the quality of the Product(s) after they have been received from ECOPETROL, in accordance with the specifications agreed upon between the Parties, the provisions of this Chapter and Annex DPP-8. The foregoing notwithstanding ECOPETROL’s obligation to verify the quality of the Products it delivers to CENIT in the case of Product imported by ECOPETROL.

 

(iii) Receive from the tanker ships at the Ports listed in Annex DPP-1 those ECOPETROL products included in ECOPETROL’s Contracted Capacity.

 

(iv) Schedule the tanker ship Unloading Unit windows.

 

Clause 2 Terms and Conditions of Service

 

(i) The provision of the Portside Product Unloading Service described in this Chapter shall be subject to the following:

 

(a) The approval of the proper authorities of the assignment of the respective concession contracts or official approvals, as applicable, to CENIT, with regard to the Ports listed in Annex DDP-1 .

 

68
 

 

  Master Service Contract for Products
Chapter IV – Portside Product Unloading Service
 

 

(b) CENIT obtaining the proper licenses, permits and authorizations to act as concessionaire.

 

(ii) While the port concessions are being exercised by CENIT under the private port system, in the event any Competent Authority modifies the interpretation of the concept of “Legally and Financially Related” discussed in Law 1 of 1991, thereby affecting ECOPETROL’s access rights to the Ports contracted under this Chapter, CENIT shall be obligated to diligently ensure the modification of the port concession contracts to guarantee the Services by means of the same.

 

(iii) Except as otherwise expressly agreed between the Parties, any modification of the Port concession contracts or official approvals shall not imply any modification of the rights and access terms granted to ECOPETROL under this Master Service Contract.

  

Clause 3 Portside Product Unloading Service Rates

 

(i) The rates for the Portside Product Unloading Service port shall be those listed in Annex DPP-2

 

(ii) Any applicable rates for Port Services shall be collected in accordance with the Port Operation Regulations.

  

Clause 4 Limitation of CENIT’s Contractual Liability

 

For the effects of the provisions of Section 16.02 of the General Terms and Conditions of the Master Service Contract, in the event of loss or damage to ECOPETROL’s Product as result of the Product Transportation Service, the following contractual liability limitations shall apply:

 

(i) For actual damage, CENIT shall pay compensation equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the Declared Value of the Product for each Barrel lost or damaged.

 

(ii) For lost profits, CENIT shall pay compensation equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the Declared Value of the Product for each Barrel lost or damaged.

 

(iii) These compensation limits shall not apply in the event of fraud or gross negligence on the part of CENIT.

 

69
 

 

  Master Service Contract for Products
Chapter IV – Portside Product Unloading Service
 

 

Clause 5 Procedures and Regulations applicable to the Portside Product Unloading Service

 

Section 5.01

The procedures and regulations listed below, which are incorporated into this Master Service Contract as an annex, shall be the rules governing Port operation and service. The procedures and regulations shall include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

(i) Ports , which is attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex DPP-1 .

 

(ii) Rates for the Portside Product Unloading Service , attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex DPP-2 .

 

(iii) Port Operation Regulations, attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex DPP-3.

 

(iv) Procedure for Resolving Delays , attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex DPP-4 .

 

(v) ECOPETROL Contracted Capacity for Ports , attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex DPP-5 .

 

(vi) Port Entry and Exit Points , attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex DPP-6 .

 

(vii) Procedure for Scheduling Windows , attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex DPP-7 .

 

(viii) Product Quality Specifications for Unloading in Ports , attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex DPP-8 .

 

(ix) MARPOL : International Convention for the prevention of pollution from ships, published in London on November second (2) 1973 and ratified by the Colombian Congress by Law 12 of 1981, and the amendments and additions thereto, attached to this Master Service Contract as Annex DPP-9 .

 

Section 5.02

Given the fact that as of the Date of Signature, CENIT does not hold the port concessions that have currently been awarded to ECOPETROL, the Parties agree to agree to the annexes listed in this Chapter within a period not to exceed two (2) months as of the date on which the port concessions are assigned, and make any necessary adjustments.

 

[ THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ]

 

70

 

Exhibit 8.1

 

Subsidiaries of Ecopetrol S.A.

 

The following table sets forth our subsidiaries, their respective countries of incorporation, our percentage ownership in each (both directly and indirectly through other subsidiaries) and our voting percentage in each at March 31, 2013.

 

COMPANY

COUNTRY OF

INCORPORATION

OWNERSHIP % VOTING %
       
Andean Chemicals Ltd. Bermuda 100 100
Bioenergy S.A.** Colombia 91.43 91.43
Bioenergy Zona Franca S.A.S.** Colombia 91.43 91.43
Black Gold Re Bermuda 100 100
Cenit Transporte y Logística de Hidrocaburos S.A.S. Colombia 100 100
Colombia Pipelines Limited** United Kingdom 51 51
       
COMAI - Compounding and Masterbatching Industry Ltda.** Colombia 100 100
       
Ecopetrol America Inc.** United States 100 100
Ecopetrol Capital AG Switzerland 100 100
Ecopetrol del Perú S.A.** Perú 100 100
Ecopetrol Global Capital S.L.U. Spain 100 100
Ecopetrol Global Energy S.L.U. Spain 100 100
Ecopetrol Oleo e Gas do Brasil Ltda** Brazil 100 100
       
EPI - Ecopetrol Pipelines International Limited Bermuda 100 100
Equion Energia Limited** United Kingdom 51 51
Hocol Petroleum Limited** Bermuda 100 100
Hocol S.A.** Cayman Islands 100 100
ODL Finance S.A. Panama 65 65
Oleoducto Bicentenario de Colombia S.A.S.** Colombia 55.97 55.97
Oleoducto Central S.A.** Colombia 72.65 72.6
Oleoducto de Colombia S.A.** Colombia 73 73
Oleoducto de los Llanos Orientales S.A. ** Panama 65 65
Propilco S.A.* Colombia 100 100
Refinería de Cartagena S.A.* Colombia 100 100
Santiago Oil Company.** Cayman Islands 51 51

 

 

*   Direct and indirect participation.

** Solely indirect participation through other subsidiaries or affiliates.

 

 

 

Exhibit 12.1

 

CERTIFICATION

I, Javier G. Gutiérrez, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Ecopetrol S.A.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

 

5. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

6. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(a) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(b) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

7. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated: April 29, 2013

 

  By: /s/ Javier G. Gutiérrez
    Name: Javier G. Gutiérrez
    Title: Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Exhibit 12.2

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Adriana M. Echeverri, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Ecopetrol S.A.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated: April 29, 2013

  By: /s/ Adriana M. Echeverri
    Name: Adriana M. Echeverri
    Title: Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

Exhibit 13.1

 

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Ecopetrol S.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: April 29, 2013      
       
  By: /s/ Javier G. Gutíerrez
    Name: Javier G. Gutiérrez
    Title: Chief Executive Officer
       
Dated: April 29, 2013      
       
  By: /s/ Adriana M. Echeverri
    Name: Adriana M. Echeverri
    Title: Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 16.1

 

KPMG Ltda.
Bogotá D.C. -Colombia
Calle 90 No. 19C – 74
Teléfono +57 (1) 6188000
Fax: +57 (1) 2185490
Internet www.kpmg.com.co
 

 

April 29, 2013

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549-7561

 

File Number: 001-34175

 

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We were previously principal accountants for Ecopetrol S.A. and, pursuant to our report included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Ecopetrol S.A. dated  April 29, 2013, we audited the consolidated financial statements of Ecopetrol S.A. as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. On March 21, 2013, we were notified that Ecopetrol S.A. engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers Limitada as its principal accountant for the year ending December 31, 2013 and that the auditor-client relationship with KPMG will cease upon completion of the audit and filing of the Annual Report on Form 20-F including Ecopetrol S.A.’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, and the issuance of our reports thereon. We have read Item 16F of Form 20-F of Ecopetrol S.A. and are agreement with the statements contained in paragraphs one, two and three made concerning our firm.

 

 

Very truly yours,

 

 

 

/s/ KPMG Ltda

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.1

 

   
      TBPE REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1580   FAX (713) 651-0849
      1100 LOUISIANA   SUITE 4600               HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5294 TELEPHONE (713) 651-9191

 

February 28, 2013

 

ECOPETROL

Cra. 13 No. 36-24

Edificio Principal, Piso 7

Bogotá, D.C., Colombia

 

At the request of ECOPETROL, Ryder Scott Company (Ryder Scott) has prepared an audit of the proved reserves attributable to certain properties of ECOPETROL, as of December 31, 2012. The subject properties are located in the country of Colombia and the United States of America.

 

For the purpose of the audit, Ryder Scott estimated the reserves based on the definitions and disclosure guidelines of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) contained in Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, Final Rule released January 14, 2009 in the Federal Register (SEC Regulations). Our third party study, completed on January 4, 2012 and presented herein, was prepared for public disclosure by ECOPETROL in filings made with the SEC in accordance with the disclosure requirements set forth in the SEC regulations.

 

The properties evaluated by Ryder Scott account for a portion of ECOPETROL’s total net proved reserves as of December 31, 2012. Based on information provided by ECOPETROL, the third party estimate conducted by Ryder Scott addresses 46 percent of the total proved developed net liquid hydrocarbon reserves and 21 percent of the total proved undeveloped net liquid hydrocarbon reserves, of ECOPETROL. Ryder Scott review also addresses 71 percent of the total net proved developed gas reserves and 42 percent of the total proved undeveloped net gas reserves, of ECOPETROL.

 

The estimated reserve amounts presented in this report, as of December 31, 2012, are related to hydrocarbon prices. The hydrocarbon prices used in the preparation of this report are based on the average prices during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered in this report, determined as the unweighted arithmetic averages of the prices in effect on the first-day-of-the-month for each month within such period, unless prices were defined by contractual arrangements, as required by the SEC regulations. Actual future prices may vary significantly from the prices required by SEC regulations; therefore, volumes of reserves actually recovered may differ significantly from the estimated quantities presented in this report. The results of Ryder Scott’s estimates are summarized below.

 

SEC PARAMETERS

Estimated Net Reserves

Certain Interests of

ECOPETROL

As of December 31, 2012  
    Proved  
    Developed     Undeveloped    

Total

Proved

 
Net Remaining Reserves                        
Oil/Condensate - MBarrels     432,912       92,555       525,467  
Sales Gas - MMCF     1,797,036       147,955       1,944,991  

 

SUITE 600, 1015 4TH STREET, S.W.       CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J4           TEL (403) 262-2799          FAX (403) 262-2790

621 17TH STREET, SUITE 1550          DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501          TEL (303) 623-9147          FAX (303) 623-4258

 

 
 

 

ECOPETROL

February 28, 2013

Page 2

 

Liquid hydrocarbons are expressed in thousand standard 42 gallon barrels. All gas volumes are reported on an “as sold” basis expressed in millions of cubic feet (MMCF) at the official temperature and pressure bases of the areas in which the gas reserves are located. These proved reserves volumes are exclusive of royalties. Further, they include ECOPETROL’s participation interest in properties operated by Equion Energía Ltd. and Hocol Petroleum Ltd.

 

Reserves Included in This Report

 

The proved reserves included herein conform to the definition as set forth in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulations Part 210.4-10(a). An abridged version of the SEC reserves definitions from 210.4-10(a) entitled “Petroleum Reserves Definitions” is included as an attachment to this report. The various proved reserve status categories are defined under the attachment entitled “Petroleum Reserves Definitions” in this report.

 

No attempt was made to quantify or otherwise account for any accumulated gas production imbalances that may exist. The proved gas volumes included herein do not attribute gas consumed in operations as reserves. Non-hydrocarbon or inert gas volumes have been excluded from the reserves reported herein.

 

Reserves are those estimated remaining quantities of petroleum that are anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, from known accumulations under defined conditions. All reserve estimates involve an assessment of the uncertainty relating the likelihood that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the estimated quantities determined as of the date the estimate is made. The uncertainty depends chiefly on the amount of reliable geologic and engineering data available at the time of the estimate and the interpretation of these data. The relative degree of uncertainty may be conveyed by placing reserves into one of two principal classifications, either proved or unproved. Unproved reserves are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves, and may be further sub-classified as probable and possible reserves to denote progressively increasing uncertainty in their recoverability. At ECOPETROL’s request, this report addresses only the proved reserves attributable to the properties evaluated herein.

 

Proved oil and gas reserves are “those quantities of oil and gas which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward.” The proved reserves included herein were estimated using deterministic methods. If deterministic methods are used, the SEC has defined reasonable certainty for proved reserves as a “high degree of confidence that the quantities will be recovered.”

 

Proved reserve estimates will generally be revised only as additional geologic or engineering data become available or as economic conditions change. For proved reserves, the SEC states that “as changes due to increased availability of geoscience (geological, geophysical, and geochemical), engineering, and economic data are made to the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) with time, reasonably certain EUR is much more likely to increase or remain constant than to decrease.” Moreover, estimates of proved reserves may be revised as a result of future operations, effects of regulation by governmental agencies or geopolitical or economic risks. Therefore, the proved reserves included in this report are estimates only and should not be construed as being exact quantities, and if recovered, the revenues therefrom, and the actual costs related thereto, could be more or less than the estimated amounts.

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY   PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
 

 

ECOPETROL

February 28, 2013

Page 3

 

The proved reserves reported herein are limited to the period prior to expiration of current contracts providing the legal rights to produce, or a revenue interest in such production, unless evidence indicates that contract renewal is reasonably certain. Furthermore, properties in the different countries may be subjected to significantly varying contractual fiscal terms that affect the net revenue to ECOPETROL for the production of these volumes. The prices and economic return received for these net volumes can vary significantly based on the terms of these contracts. Therefore, when applicable, Ryder Scott reviewed the fiscal terms of such contracts and discussed with ECOPETROL the net economic benefit attributed to such operations for the determination of the net hydrocarbon volumes and income thereof. Ryder Scott has not conducted an exhaustive audit or verification of such contractual information. Neither our review of such contractual information nor our acceptance of ECOPETROL’s representations regarding such contractual information should be construed as a legal opinion on this matter.

 

Ryder Scott did not evaluate the country and geopolitical risks in the countries where ECOPETROL operates or has interests. ECOPETROL’s operations may be subject to various levels of governmental controls and regulations. These controls and regulations may include, but may not be limited to, matters relating to land tenure and leasing, the legal rights to produce hydrocarbons including the granting, extension or termination of production sharing contracts, the fiscal terms of various production sharing contracts, drilling and production practices, environmental protection, marketing and pricing policies, royalties, various taxes and levies including income tax, and foreign trade and investment and are subject to change from time to time. Such changes in governmental regulations and policies may cause volumes of proved reserves actually recovered and amounts of proved income actually received to differ significantly from the estimated quantities.

 

The estimates of proved reserves presented herein were based upon a detailed study of the properties in which ECOPETROL owns an interest; however, we have not made any field examination of the properties. No consideration was given in this report to potential environmental liabilities that may exist nor were any costs included for potential liabilities to restore and clean up damages, if any, caused by past operating practices.

 

Estimates of Reserves

 

The estimation of reserves involves two distinct determinations. The first determination results in the estimation of the quantities of recoverable oil and gas and the second determination results in the estimation of the uncertainty associated with those estimated quantities in accordance with the definitions set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulations Part 210.4-10(a). The process of estimating the quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves relies on the use of certain generally accepted analytical procedures. These analytical procedures fall into three broad categories or methods: (1) performance-based methods; (2) volumetric-based methods; and (3) analogy. These methods may be used singularly or in combination by the reserve evaluator in the process of estimating the quantities of reserves. Reserve evaluators must select the method or combination of methods which in their professional judgment is most appropriate given the nature and amount of reliable geoscience and engineering data available at the time of the estimate, the established or anticipated performance characteristics of the reservoir being evaluated and the stage of development or producing maturity of the property.

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY   PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
 

 

ECOPETROL

February 28, 2013

Page 4

 

In many cases, the analysis of the available geoscience and engineering data and the subsequent interpretation of this data may indicate a range of possible outcomes in an estimate, irrespective of the method selected by the evaluator. When a range in the quantity of reserves is identified, the evaluator must determine the uncertainty associated with the incremental quantities of the reserves. If the reserve quantities are estimated using the deterministic incremental approach, the uncertainty for each discrete incremental quantity of the reserves is addressed by the reserve category assigned by the evaluator. Therefore, it is the categorization of reserve quantities as proved, probable and/or possible that addresses the inherent uncertainty in the estimated quantities reported. For proved reserves, uncertainty is defined by the SEC as reasonable certainty wherein the “quantities actually recovered are much more likely than not to be achieved.” The SEC states that “probable reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves but which, together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.” The SEC states that “possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves and the total quantities ultimately recovered from a project have a low probability of exceeding proved plus probable plus possible reserves.” All quantities of reserves within the same reserve category must meet the SEC definitions as noted above.

 

Estimates of reserves quantities and their associated reserve categories may be revised in the future as additional geoscience or engineering data become available. Furthermore, estimates of reserves quantities and their associated reserve categories may also be revised due to other factors such as changes in economic conditions, results of future operations, effects of regulation by governmental agencies or geopolitical economic risks as previously noted herein.

 

The proved reserves for the properties included herein were estimated by performance methods, the volumetric method, or a combination of performance and volumetric methods. The following table summarizes the approximate percent of reserves estimated by each of these methods.

 

Approximate Percent Proved Reserves Estimated by the Various Methods  
    Gas     Liquid Hydrocarbons  
Method   Developed     Undeveloped     Developed     Undeveloped  
Volumetric     -       100 %     -       29 %
Performance     -       -       74 %     -  
Analogy     -       -       -       59 %
Combination     100 %     -       26 %     12 %

 

These performance methods include, but may not be limited to, decline curve analysis and analogy which utilized extrapolations of historical production and pressure data available through November 2012 in those cases where such data were considered to be definitive. The data utilized in this analysis were supplied to Ryder Scott by ECOPETROL and were considered sufficient for the purpose thereof. The volumetric method was used where there were inadequate historical performance data to establish a definitive trend and where the use of production performance data as a basis for the reserve estimates was considered to be inappropriate. The volumetric analysis utilized pertinent well and seismic data supplied to Ryder Scott by ECOPETROL that were available through November, 2012. The data utilized from the well and seismic data incorporated into our volumetric analysis were considered sufficient for the purpose thereof.

 

To estimate economically recoverable proved oil and gas reserves and related future net cash flows, we consider many factors and assumptions including, but not limited to, the use of reservoir parameters derived from geological, geophysical and engineering data that cannot be measured directly, economic criteria based on current costs and SEC pricing requirements, and forecasts of future production rates. Under the SEC regulations 210.4-10(a)(22)(v) and (26), proved reserves must be anticipated to be economically producible from a given date forward based on existing economic conditions including the prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. While it may reasonably be anticipated that the future prices received for the sale of production and the operating costs and other costs relating to such production may increase or decrease from those under existing economic conditions, such changes were, in accordance with rules adopted by the SEC, omitted from consideration in making this evaluation.

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY   PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
 

 

ECOPETROL

February 28, 2013

Page 5

 

ECOPETROL has informed us that they have furnished us all of the material accounts, records, geological and engineering data, and reports and other data required for this investigation. In preparing our forecast of future proved production and income, we have relied upon data furnished by ECOPETROL with respect to property interests owned, production and well tests from examined wells, normal direct costs of operating the wells or leases, other costs such as transportation and/or processing fees, ad valorem and production taxes, recompletion and development costs, abandonment costs after salvage, product prices based on the SEC regulations, adjustments or differentials to product prices, geological structural and isochore maps, well logs, core analyses, and pressure measurements. Ryder Scott reviewed such factual data for its reasonableness; however, we have not conducted an independent verification of the data furnished by ECOPETROL. We consider the factual data used in this report appropriate and sufficient for the purpose of preparing the estimates of reserves herein.

 

In summary, we consider the assumptions, data, methods and analytical procedures used in this report appropriate for the purpose hereof, and we have used all such methods and procedures that we consider necessary and appropriate to prepare the estimates of reserves herein. The proved reserves included herein were determined in conformance with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule, including all references to Regulation S-X and Regulation S-K, referred to herein collectively as the “SEC Regulations.” In our opinion, the proved reserves presented in this report comply with the definitions, guidelines and disclosure requirements as required by the SEC regulations.

 

Future Production Rates

 

For wells currently on production, our forecasts of future production rates are based on historical performance data. If no production decline trend has been established, future production rates were held constant, or adjusted for the effects of curtailment where appropriate, until a decline in ability to produce was anticipated. An estimated rate of decline was then applied to depletion of the reserves. If a decline trend has been established, this trend was used as the basis for estimating future production rates.

 

Test data and other related information were used to estimate the anticipated initial production rates for those wells or locations that are not currently producing. For reserves not yet on production, sales were estimated to commence at an anticipated date furnished by ECOPETROL. Wells or locations that are not currently producing may start producing earlier or later than anticipated in our estimates due to unforeseen factors causing a change in the timing to initiate production. Such factors may include delays due to weather, the availability of rigs, the sequence of drilling, completing and/or recompleting wells and/or constraints set by regulatory bodies.

 

The future production rates from wells currently on production or wells or locations that are not currently producing may be more or less than estimated because of changes including, but not limited to, reservoir performance, operating conditions related to surface facilities, compression and artificial lift, pipeline capacity and/or operating conditions, producing market demand and/or allowables or other constraints set by regulatory bodies.

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY   PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
 

 

ECOPETROL

February 28, 2013

Page 6

 

Hydrocarbon Prices

 

The hydrocarbon prices used herein are based on SEC price parameters using the average prices during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered in this report, determined as the unweighted arithmetic averages of the prices in effect on the first-day-of-the-month for each month within such period, unless prices were defined by contractual arrangements. For hydrocarbon products sold under contract, the contract prices, including fixed and determinable escalations, exclusive of inflation adjustments, were used until expiration of the contract. Upon contract expiration, the prices were adjusted to the 12-month unweighted arithmetic average as previously described.

 

ECOPETROL furnished us with the above mentioned average prices in effect on December 31, 2012. These initial SEC hydrocarbon prices were determined using the 12-month average first-day-of-the-month benchmark prices appropriate to the geographic area where the hydrocarbons are sold. These benchmark prices are prior to the adjustments for differentials as described herein. The table below summarizes the “benchmark prices” and “price reference” used for the geographic area included in the report. In certain geographic areas, the price reference and benchmark prices may be defined by contractual arrangements. In cases where there are numerous contracts or price references within the same geographic area, the benchmark price is represented by the unweighted arithmetic average of the initial 12-month average first-day-of-the-month benchmark prices used.

 

The product prices that were actually used to determine the future gross revenue for each property reflect adjustments to the benchmark prices for gravity, quality, local conditions and/or distance from market, referred to herein as “differentials.” The differentials used in the preparation of this report were furnished to us by ECOPETROL. The differentials furnished to us were accepted as factual data and reviewed by us for their reasonableness; however, we have not conducted an independent verification of the data used by ECOPETROL to determine these differentials.

 

In addition, the following table summarizes the net volume weighted benchmark prices adjusted for differentials and referred to herein as the “average realized prices.” The average realized prices shown in the table below were determined from the total future gross revenue before production taxes and the total net reserves for the geographic area and presented in accordance with SEC disclosure requirements for each of the geographic areas included in the report.

 

Geographic Area   Product   Price
Reference
  Average
Benchmark
Prices
  Average
Realized
Prices
    Oil/Condensate   Brent Spot Price   $111.21/Bbl   $99.20/Bbl
South America   NGLs   Brent Spot Price   $111.21/Bbl   $55.78/Bbl
    Gas   Contract   Contract   $4.40/MCF
North America   Oil/Condensate   Brent Spot Price   $111.21/Bbl   $108.07/Bbl
    Gas   Henry Hub   $2.76/MMBTU   $2.76/MCF

 

For the properties reviewed by Ryder Scott, approximately 85 percent of the future gross income is derived from the sale of liquid hydrocarbons and 15 percent from gas sales.

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY   PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
 

 

ECOPETROL

February 28, 2013

Page 7

 

Costs

 

Operating costs used in our evaluation were based on the operating expense reports of ECOPETROL and include only those costs directly applicable to the evaluated assets. The operating costs include a portion of general and administrative costs allocated directly to the leases and wells. The operating costs furnished to us were accepted as factual data and reviewed by us for their reasonableness; however, we have not conducted an independent verification of the operating cost data used by ECOPETROL. No deduction was made for loan repayments, interest expenses, or exploration and development prepayments that were not charged directly to the assets.

 

Development costs were furnished to us by ECOPETROL and are based on authorizations for expenditure for the proposed work or actual costs for similar projects. The development costs furnished to us were accepted as factual data and reviewed by us for their reasonableness; however, we have not conducted an independent verification of these costs. The estimated net cost of abandonment after salvage was included for properties where abandonment costs net of salvage were significant. The estimates of the net abandonment costs furnished by ECOPETROL were accepted without independent verification.

 

The proved developed and undeveloped reserves in this report have been incorporated herein in accordance with ECOPETROL’s plans to develop these reserves as of December 31, 2012. The implementation of ECOPETROL’s development plans as presented to us and incorporated herein is subject to the approval process adopted by ECOPETROL’s management. As the result of our inquires during the course of preparing this report, ECOPETROL has informed us that the development activities included herein have been subjected to and received the internal approvals required by ECOPETROL’s management at the appropriate local, regional and/or corporate level. In addition to the internal approvals as noted, certain development activities may still be subject to specific partner AFE processes, Joint Operating Agreement (JOA) requirements or other administrative approvals external to ECOPETROL. Additionally, ECOPETROL has informed us that they are not aware of any legal, regulatory, political or economic obstacles that would significantly alter their plans.

 

Current costs used by ECOPETROL were held constant throughout the life of the properties.

 

Standards of Independence and Professional Qualification

 

Ryder Scott is an independent petroleum engineering consulting firm that has been providing petroleum consulting services throughout the world for over seventy years. Ryder Scott is employee-owned and maintains offices in Houston, Texas; Denver, Colorado; and Calgary, Alberta, Canada. We have over eighty engineers and geoscientists on our permanent staff. By virtue of the size of our firm and the large number of clients for which we provide services, no single client or job represents a material portion of our annual revenue. We do not serve as officers or directors of any privately-owned or publicly-traded oil and gas company and are separate and independent from the operating and investment decision-making process of our clients. This allows us to bring the highest level of independence and objectivity to each engagement for our services.

 

Ryder Scott actively participates in industry-related professional societies and organizes an annual public forum focused on the subject of reserves evaluations and SEC regulations. Many of our staff have authored or co-authored technical papers on the subject of reserves related topics. We encourage our staff to maintain and enhance their professional skills by actively participating in ongoing continuing education.

 

Prior to becoming an officer of the Company, Ryder Scott requires that staff engineers and geoscientists have received professional accreditation in the form of a registered or certified professional engineer’s license or a registered or certified professional geoscientist’s license, or the equivalent thereof, from an appropriate governmental authority or a recognized self-regulating professional organization.

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY   PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
 

 

ECOPETROL

February 28, 2013

Page 8

 

We are independent petroleum engineers with respect to ECOPETROL. Neither we nor any of our employees have any interest in the subject properties and neither the employment to do this work nor the compensation is contingent on our estimates of reserves for the properties which were reviewed.

 

The results of this study, presented herein, are based on technical analysis conducted by teams of geoscientists and engineers from Ryder Scott. The professional qualifications of the undersigned, the technical person primarily responsible for overseeing, reviewing and approving the evaluation of the reserves information discussed in this report, are included as an attachment to this letter.

 

Terms of Usage

 

The results of our third party study, presented in report form herein, were prepared in accordance with the disclosure requirements set forth in the SEC regulations and intended for public disclosure as an exhibit in filings made with the SEC by ECOPETROL.

 

We have provided ECOPETROL with a digital version of the original signed copy of this report letter. In the event there are any differences between the digital version included in filings made by ECOPETROL and the original signed report letter, the original signed report letter shall control and supersede the digital version.

 

The data and work papers used in the preparation of this report are available for examination by authorized parties in our offices. Please contact us if we can be of further service.

 

  Very truly yours,
   
  RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L. P.
  TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580
   
  \s\ Herman G. Acuña
   
  Herman G. Acuna, P.E.
  Texas P.E. License No. 92254
  Managing Senior Vice President–International

 

[SEAL]

 

HGA (DPR)/aga

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY   PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
 

 

Professional Qualifications

 

The conclusions presented in this report for Ecopetrol for properties located in Colombia are the result of technical analysis conducted by teams of geoscientists and engineers from Ryder Scott Company, L.P. Herman G. Acuña was the primary technical person responsible for overseeing the independent estimation of the reserves, future production and income to render the audit conclusions of the report.

 

Mr. Acuña, an employee of Ryder Scott Company, L.P. (Ryder Scott) since 1997, is a Managing Senior International Vice President and Board Member. He serves as an Engineering Group Coordinator responsible for coordinating and supervising staff and consulting engineers of the company in ongoing reservoir evaluation studies worldwide. Before joining Ryder Scott, Mr. Acuña served in a number of engineering positions with Exxon. For more information regarding Mr. Acuña’s geographic and job specific experience, please refer to the Ryder Scott Company website at www.ryderscott.com.

 

Mr. Acuña earned a Bachelor (Cum Laude) and a Masters (Magna Cum Laude) of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from The University of Tulsa in 1987 and 1989 respectively. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Texas, a member of the Association of International Petroleum Negotiators (AIPN) and the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).

 

In addition to gaining experience and competency through prior work experience, the Texas Board of Professional Engineers requires a minimum of fifteen hours of continuing education annually, including at least one hour in the area of professional ethics, which Mr. Acuña fulfills. Mr. Acuña has attending formalized training and conferences including dedicated to the subject to the definitions and disclosure guidelines contained in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, Final Rule released January 14, 2009 in the Federal Register. Mr. Acuña has recently taught various company reserves evaluation schools in Argentina, China, Denmark, Spain and the U.S.A. Mr. Acuña has participated in various capacities in reserves conferences such as being a panelist at Trinidad and Tobago’s Petroleum Conference, delivering the reserves evaluation seminar during IAPG conversion in Mendoza, Argentina and chairing the first Reserves Evaluation Conference in the Middle East in Dubai, U.A.E.

 

Based on his educational background, professional training and over 20 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering and the estimation and evaluation of petroleum reserves, Mr. Acuña has attained the professional qualifications as a Reserves Estimator and Reserves Auditor set forth in Article III of the “Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information” promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers as of February 19, 2007.

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY   PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
 

 

PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS

 

As Adapted From:

RULE 4-10( a ) of REGULATION S-X PART 210
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)

 

PREAMBLE

 

On January 14, 2009, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published the “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule” in the Federal Register of National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule” includes revisions and additions to the definition section in Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X, revisions and additions to the oil and gas reporting requirements in Regulation S-K, and amends and codifies Industry Guide 2 in Regulation S-K. The “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule”, including all references to Regulation S-X and Regulation S-K, shall be referred to herein collectively as the “SEC Regulations”. The SEC Regulations take effect for all filings made with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as of December 31, 2009, or after January 1, 2010. Reference should be made to the full text under Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Regulation S-X Part 210, Rule 4-10(a) for the complete definitions, as the following definitions, descriptions and explanations rely wholly or in part on excerpts from the original document (direct passages excerpted from the aforementioned SEC document are denoted in italics herein).

 

Reserves are those estimated remaining quantities of petroleum which are anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, from known accumulations under defined conditions. All reserve estimates involve some degree of uncertainty. The uncertainty depends chiefly on the amount of reliable geologic and engineering data available at the time of the estimate and the interpretation of these data. The relative degree of uncertainty may be conveyed by placing reserves into one of two principal classifications, either proved or unproved. Unproved reserves are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves and may be further sub-classified as probable and possible reserves to denote progressively increasing uncertainty in their recoverability. Under the SEC Regulations as of December 31, 2009, or after January 1, 2010, a company may optionally disclose estimated quantities of probable or possible oil and gas reserves in documents publicly filed with the Commission. The SEC Regulations continue to prohibit disclosure of estimates of oil and gas resources other than reserves and any estimated values of such resources in any document publicly filed with the Commission unless such information is required to be disclosed in the document by foreign or state law as noted in §229.1202 Instruction to Item 1202.

 

Reserves estimates will generally be revised as additional geologic or engineering data become available or as economic conditions change.

 

Reserves may be attributed to either natural energy or improved recovery methods. Improved recovery methods include all methods for supplementing natural energy or altering natural forces in the reservoir to increase ultimate recovery. Examples of such methods are pressure maintenance, natural gas cycling, waterflooding, thermal methods, chemical flooding, and the use of miscible and immiscible displacement fluids. Other improved recovery methods may be developed in the future as petroleum technology continues to evolve.

 

Reserves may be attributed to either conventional or unconventional petroleum accumulations. Petroleum accumulations are considered as either conventional or unconventional based on the nature of their in-place characteristics, extraction method applied, or degree of processing prior to sale. Examples of unconventional petroleum accumulations include coalbed or coalseam methane (CBM/CSM), basin-centered gas, shale gas, gas hydrates, natural bitumen and oil shale deposits. These unconventional accumulations may require specialized extraction technology and/or significant processing prior to sale.

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY   PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
 

 

RESERVES STATUS DEFINITIONS AND GUIDELINES

Page 2

 

Reserves do not include quantities of petroleum being held in inventory.

 

Because of the differences in uncertainty, caution should be exercised when aggregating quantities of petroleum from different reserves categories.

 

RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)

 

Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(26) defines reserves as follows:

 

Reserves . Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known accumulations. In addition, there must exist, or there must be a reasonable expectation that there will exist, the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in the production, installed means of delivering oil and gas or related substances to market, and all permits and financing required to implement the project.

 

Note to paragraph (a)(26) : Reserves should not be assigned to adjacent reservoirs isolated by major, potentially sealing, faults until those reservoirs are penetrated and evaluated as economically producible. Reserves should not be assigned to areas that are clearly separated from a known accumulation by a non-productive reservoir ( i.e. , absence of reservoir, structurally low reservoir, or negative test results). Such areas may contain prospective resources ( i.e; , potentially recoverable resources from undiscovered accumulations).

 

PROVED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)

 

Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(22) defines proved oil and gas reserves as follows:

 

Proved oil and gas reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible ¾ from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations ¾ prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

 

(i) The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes:

 

(A)        The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and

 

(B)        Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data.

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY   PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
 

 

RESERVES STATUS DEFINITIONS AND GUIDELINES

Page 3

 

PROVED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS) CONTINUED

 

(ii)        In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with reasonable certainty.

 

(iii)        Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty.

 

(iv)        Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when:

 

(A)        Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based; and

 

(B)        The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities.

 

(v)        Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon further conditions.

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY   PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
 

  

RESERVES STATUS DEFINITIONS AND GUIDELINES

 

As Adapted From :
RULE 4-10( a ) of REGULATION S-X PART 210
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)

   

and

 

PETROLEUM RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SPE-PRMS)
Sponsored and Approved by:
SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS (SPE),
WORLD PETROLEUM COUNCIL (WPC)
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS (AAPG)
SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM EV  

ALUATION ENGINEERS (SPEE)

 

Reserves status categories define the development and producing status of wells and reservoirs. Reference should be made to Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Regulation S-X Part 210, Rule 4-10(a) and the SPE-PRMS as the following reserves status definitions are based on excerpts from the original documents (direct passages excerpted from the aforementioned SEC and SPE-PRMS documents are denoted in italics herein).

   

DEVELOPED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)

 

Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(6) defines developed oil and gas reserves as follows:

 

Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered:

 

(i) Through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and

 

(ii) Through installed extracting equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well.

 

Developed Producing (SPE-PRMS Definitions)

 

While not a requirement for disclosure under the SEC regulations, developed oil and gas reserves may be further sub-classified according to the guidance contained in the SPE-PRMS as Producing or Non-Producing.

 

Developed Producing Reserves

Developed Producing Reserves are expected to be recovered from completion intervals that are open and producing at the time of the estimate.

 

Improved recovery reserves are considered producing only after the improved recovery project is in operation.

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY   PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
 

 

RESERVES STATUS DEFINITIONS AND GUIDELINES

Page 2

 

Developed Non-Producing

Developed Non-Producing Reserves include shut-in and behind-pipe reserves.

 

Shut-In

Shut-in Reserves are expected to be recovered from:

(1)        completion intervals which are open at the time of the estimate but which have not yet started producing;

(2)        wells which were shut-in for market conditions or pipeline connections; or

(3)        wells not capable of production for mechanical reasons.

 

Behind-Pipe

Behind-pipe Reserves are expected to be recovered from zones in existing wells which will require additional completion work or future re-completion prior to start of production.

 

In all cases, production can be initiated or restored with relatively low expenditure compared to the cost of drilling a new well.

 

UNDEVELOPED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)

 

Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(31) defines undeveloped oil and gas reserves as follows:

 

Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.

 

(i) Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances.

 

(ii) Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances, justify a longer time.

  

(iii) Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, as defined in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.

 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY   PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

 

Exhibit 99.2

  

 

 

 

Gaffney, Cline & Associates, Inc.

 

1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 1000

Houston, TX 77056

Telephone: +1 713 850 9955

www.gaffney-cline.com 

 

 

ASF/gjh/AH-12-2038.00/gcah.100.13 March 08, 2013

 

 

Mrs. Adriana Marcela Echeverri

Vice-President of Finance (CFO)

Ecopetrol, S. A.

Vicepresidencia Financiera

Edificio Principal, Piso 7

Bogota, Colombia

  

 

RESERVE AUDIT

FOR SIXTY EIGHT FIELDS IN COLOMBIA

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013

 

Dear Mrs. Echeverri:

 

This Proved reserves statement has been prepared by Gaffney, Cline & Associates (GCA) and issued on March 08, 2013 at the request of Ecopetrol, S.A. (Ecopetrol), a participant operator and investor in sixty eight fields in the Lower, Middle and Upper Magdalena Valley, Catatumbo, Putumayo, Llanos Orientales and Nororiente Basins, Colombia. This report is based on prior audits conducted by GCA and is intended for use in conjunction with Ecopetrol’s December 31, 2012 20-F filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

GCA has conducted an independent audit examination as of December 31, 2012, of the Proved hydrocarbon liquids and natural gas reserves of the above mentioned fields. On the basis of technical and other information made available to us concerning these property units, we hereby provide the reserve statement given in the table below.

 

STATEMENT OF PROVED HYDROCARBON RESERVES VOLUMES

SIXTY EIGHT FIELDS, COLOMBIA

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2012

 

  Net to Ecopetrol
 Reserves Category Liquids Gas
  MMBbl Bscf
Proved    
   Developed 352 722
   Undeveloped 226 190
Total Proved   578 912

 

ASF/gjh/AH-12-2038.00/gcah.100.13
Ecopetrol, S. A.

 

Hydrocarbon liquid volumes represent crude oil and condensate, natural gasoline and LPG estimated to be recovered during field separation and plant processing, and are reported in millions of barrels (MMBbl). Natural gas volumes represent expected gas sales, and are reported in billions (10 9 ) of cubic feet (Bscf) at standard conditions of 14.7 psia and 60 degrees Fahrenheit. These volumes have been reduced for fuel usage in the field. Royalties payable to the State have been deducted from reported net volumes.

 

Proved gas volumes are based on firm and existing gas contracts and on the reasonable expectation that such gas sales contracts will be renewed on similar terms in the future.

 

Ecopetrol has advised GCA that these audited hydrocarbon volumes represent the following proportionate shares of Ecopetrol’s total reserves on a net basis:

 

Proved Developed Liquids – 38%

 

Proved Developed Gas – 28%

 

Proved Undeveloped Liquids – 52%

 

Proved Undeveloped Gas – 54%

 

Total Proved Oil Equivalent - 39.0%

 

GCA is not in a position to verify these values as it was not requested to review Ecopetrol’s other oil and gas assets.

 

This audit examination was based on reserve estimates and other information provided by Ecopetrol to GCA through December 2012, and included such tests, procedures and adjustments as were considered necessary. Field data and information provided by Ecopetrol varies from field to field. Ecopetrol provided production data sets, depending on the field, up to September or August 2012. All questions that arose during the course of the audit process were resolved to our satisfaction.

 

Technical information and comments related to the methodology followed to audit the reserves volumes for each one of the fields is presented in separate individual reports. As these reports are quite extensive and detailed, the significant points of the work performed are summarized below.

 

Recoverable volume estimates as derived from profiles of expected future performance were checked for consistency with the development plans provided by Ecopetrol. These were further verified on the basis of individual well decline analysis, typical well performance models, material balance calculations, reservoir simulation results, analogies, etc. as appropriate to the available information and category of the reserves. Gross reserves and those net to Ecopetrol’s interests were verified on the basis of the fiscal and contractual terms applicable for each field.

 

In order to confirm estimates of petroleum initially in place, the structural and stratigraphic descriptions of the accumulations, various reservoir limits, rock petrophysical parameters and reservoir fluid properties were reviewed, checked for reasonableness and/or modified as appropriate based on information and data supplied by Ecopetrol. Reservoir and individual well performance was analyzed in order to assess the predominant reservoir drive mechanisms currently active in the fields and those expected to affect the future production performance.

 

2
ASF/gjh/AH-12-2038.00/gcah.100.13
Ecopetrol, S. A.

 

The economic tests for the December 31, 2012 reserve volumes were based on a prior twelve-month first-day-of-the-month average reference price for Brent crude of US$111.13/Bbl, corrected for location and quality to average wellhead prices in the range of US$74.72/Bbl – 112.53/Bbl, depending on the specific field. Sales gas and plant product prices were advised by Ecopetrol according to existing contracts and/or regulations. No price escalation has been included, other than as provided for in existing contracts. The following tables include additional details of these prices:

 

OIL AND CONDENSATE PRICES

 

Note Price US$/Bbl  
 
12 month average price for Brent Crude used as reference for the crude prices in Colombia. 111.13  
Unweighted average of the prices adjusted for location and quality used  to determine oil and condensate proved reserves for the different fields in Colombia 99.98  

 

PRODUCT PLANT PRICES

 

Note Products Plants Price US$/Bbl  
 

12 month average reference price (Mont Belvieu, Texas)

Propane 43.37  
Butane 69.56  
Gasoline 90.74  
Unweighted average price adjusted for location and quality used to determine proved reserves in Colombia Assets Propane 29.27  
Butane 55.47  
Gasoline 87.49  

 

3
ASF/gjh/AH-12-2038.00/gcah.100.13
Ecopetrol, S. A.

 

GAS PRICES

 

Note Location/Fields Price US$/MMBTU  
 
Average benchmark natural gas price - Colombia Guajira (Benchmark Price) 5.81  
Opón (Benchmark Price) 6.71  
Cusiana (Benchmark Price) 3.32  
Natural gas average price defined by contract / agreements used to determine proved reserves in some Colombia fields All fields audited by GCA except Guajira fields. 4.73  
Adjusted gas price  used to determine proved reserves in the remaining Colombia Fields Guajira fields: Ballena, Chuchupa     and Riohacha. 5.63  

 

Future capital costs for the fields were derived from development program forecasts prepared by field operators. Recent historical operating expense data were utilized as the basis for operating cost projections. GCA has found that sufficient capital investments and operating expenses have been projected by the operators to produce the projected volumes.

 

It is GCA’s opinion that the estimates of total remaining recoverable hydrocarbon liquid and gas volumes as of December 31, 2012 are, in the aggregate, reasonable and the reserves categorization is appropriate and consistent with the definitions for reserves set out in 17 CFR Part 210 Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. GCA concludes that the methodologies employed by Ecopetrol in the derivation of the reserves estimates are appropriate and that the quality of the data relied upon and the depth and thoroughness of the reserves estimation process are adequate.

 

GCA is not aware of any potential changes in regulations applicable to these fields that could affect the ability of Ecopetrol to produce the estimated reserves.

 

This assessment has been conducted within the context of GCA’s understanding of Ecopetrol’s petroleum property rights as represented by Ecopetrol’s management. GCA is not in a position to attest to property title, financial interest relationships or encumbrances thereon for any part of the appraised properties or interests.

 

There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating reserves and resources, and in projecting future production, development expenditures, operating expenses and cash flows. Oil and gas reserve engineering and resource assessment must be recognized as a subjective process of estimating subsurface accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be measured in an exact way. Estimates of oil and gas reserves or resources prepared by other parties may differ, perhaps materially, from those contained within this report. The accuracy of any Reserve or Resource estimate is a function of the quality of the available data and of engineering and geological interpretation. Results of drilling, testing and production that post-date the preparation of the estimates may justify revisions, some or all of which may be material. Accordingly, Reserve and Resource estimates are often different from the quantities of oil and gas that are ultimately recovered, and the timing and cost of those volumes that are recovered may vary from that assumed.

 

* * * * *

 

4
ASF/gjh/AH-12-2038.00/gcah.100.13
Ecopetrol, S. A.

 

For this assignment, GCA served as independent reserve auditor. The firm’s officers and employees have no direct or indirect interest holdings in the property units evaluated. GCA’s remuneration was not in any way contingent on reported reserve estimates. The qualifications of the technical person primarily responsible for overseeing this audit are included in Appendix I.

 

Ecopetrol will obtain GCA’s prior written or email approval for the use with third parties and context of the use with third parties of any results, statements or opinions expressed by GCA to Ecopetrol, which are attributed to GCA. Such requirement of approval shall include, but not be confined to, statements or references in documents of a public or semi-public nature such as loan agreements, prospectuses, reserve statements, websites, press releases, etc.

 

Very truly yours,

 

GAFFNEY, CLINE & ASSOCIATES

 

 

Project Manager – Alberto S. Finol

Petroleum Engineer

 

 

Peer Reviewer - David K. Morgan

Senior Technical Manager

  

Appendices:

 

Appendix I: Technical Qualifications of Person Responsible for Audit

 

5
ASF/gjh/AH-12-2038.00/gcah.100.13
Ecopetrol, S. A.

 

 

APPENDIX I:

 

TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR AUDIT

 

 
ASF/gjh/AH-12-2038.00/gcah.100.13
Ecopetrol, S. A.

 

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

 

David. K. Morgan

 

 

David K. Morgan is one of GCA’s Senior Technical Managers and was responsible for overseeing the preparation of the audit. Mr. Morgan has over 42 years of diversified international industry experience mainly in reservoir-engineering, geology, reserves estimates, project development, economics and training in the assessment, classification and reporting of reserves and resources. Over the past 5 years he has been responsible for project review and oversight for GCA’s Houston office as it pertains to exploration and production activities including the reserves audits conducted on behalf of Repsol YPF S.A. and YPF S.A. He is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) and holds a petroleum engineering degree from Marietta College.

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.3

 

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

5001 Spring Valley Road

Suite 800 East

Dallas, Texas 75244

 

February 26, 2013

 

Board of Directors

Ecopetrol S.A.

Calle 35 No. 7-21 Piso 1

Bogota, D.C. Colombia

 

Gentlemen:

 

Pursuant to your request, we have audited the net proved hydrocarbon reserves, as of December 31, 2012, of certain selected properties in Colombia and Peru owned by Ecopetrol S.A., its wholly owned subsidiary Hocol Petroleum Limited, and through its ownership interest in Savia Peru S.A. (collectively, “ECOPETROL”). This evaluation was completed on February 26, 2013. ECOPETROL has represented that these properties account for 14 percent on a net equivalent barrel basis of ECOPETROL’s net proved reserves as of December 31, 2012. ECOPETROL has also represented that these properties account for 14 percent of ECOPETROL’s total proved developed net liquid hydrocarbon (oil, condensate, and natural gas liquids (NGL)) reserves, 1 percent of its total proved developed net gas reserves, 27 percent of its total proved undeveloped net liquid hydrocarbon reserves, and 4 percent of its total proved undeveloped net gas reserves. The net proved reserves estimates have been prepared in accordance with the reserves definitions of Rules 4–10(a) (1)–(32) of Regulation S–X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of the United States. This report was prepared in accordance with guidelines specified in Item 1202 (a)(8) of Regulation S-K and is to be used for inclusion in certain SEC filings by ECOPETROL.

 

Reserves included herein are expressed as net reserves. Gross reserves are defined as the total estimated petroleum to be produced from these properties after December 31, 2012. Net reserves are defined as that portion of the gross reserves attributable to the interests owned by ECOPETROL after deducting all interests owned by others, including royalties paid in kind.

 

 
 

 

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

 

Estimates of oil, condensate, NGL, and natural gas reserves should be regarded only as estimates that may change as further production history and additional information become available. Not only are such reserves estimates based on that information which is currently available, but such estimates are also subject to the uncertainties inherent in the application of judgmental factors in interpreting such information.

 

Data used in this audit were obtained from reviews with ECOPETROL personnel, ECOPETROL files, from records on file with the appropriate regulatory agencies, and from public sources. In the preparation of this report we have relied, without independent verification, upon such information furnished by ECOPETROL with respect to property interests, production from such properties, current costs of operation and development, current prices for production, agreements relating to current and future operations and sale of production, and various other information and data that were accepted as represented. A field examination of the properties was not considered necessary for the purposes of this report. We believe the data used in this audit are appropriate for the purposes of this report.

 

Methodology and Procedures

 

Estimates of reserves were prepared by the use of appropriate geologic, petroleum engineering, and evaluation principles and techniques that are in accordance with practices generally recognized by the petroleum industry as presented in the publication of the Society of Petroleum Engineers entitled “Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information (Revision as of February 19, 2007).” The method or combination of methods used in the analysis of each reservoir was tempered by experience with similar reservoirs, stage of development, quality and completeness of basic data, and production history.

 

When applicable, the volumetric method was used to estimate the original oil in place (OOIP) and the original gas in place (OGIP). Structure and isopach maps were constructed to estimate reservoir volume. Electrical logs, radioactivity logs, core analyses, and other available data were used to prepare these maps as well as to estimate representative values for porosity and water saturation. When adequate data were available and when circumstances justified, material balance and other engineering methods were used to estimate OOIP or OGIP.

 

2
 

 

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

 

Estimates of ultimate recovery were obtained after applying recovery factors to OOIP or OGIP. These recovery factors were based on consideration of the type of energy inherent in the reservoirs, analyses of the petroleum, the structural positions of the properties, and the production histories. When applicable, material balance and other engineering methods were used to estimate recovery factors. An analysis of reservoir performance, including production rate, reservoir pressure, and gas-oil ratio behavior, was used in the estimation of reserves.

 

For depletion-type reservoirs or those whose performance disclosed a reliable decline in producing-rate trends or other diagnostic characteristics, reserves were estimated by the application of appropriate decline curves or other performance relationships. In the analyses of production-decline curves, reserves were estimated only to the limits of economic production or to the limit of the production licenses as appropriate.

 

The proved reserves for the properties included herein were estimated by the performance method, the volumetric method, or a combination of performance and volumetric methods. The following table summarizes the approximate percentage of net reserves estimated by each of these methods.

 

Percent Net Proved Reserves Estimated by Method  
    Gas     Liquid Hydrocarbons  
Method   Developed
(%)
    Undeveloped
(%)
    Developed
(%)
    Undeveloped
(%)
 
                         
Volumetric     0       0       <1       <1  
Performance     100       12       25       7  
Combination     0       88       74       92  

 

Definition of Reserves

 

Petroleum reserves estimated by us included in this report are classified as proved. Only proved reserves have been evaluated for this report. Reserves classifications used in this report are in accordance with the reserves definitions of Rules 4–10(a) (1)–(32) of Regulation S–X of the SEC. Reserves are judged to be economically producible in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions and assuming continuation of current regulatory practices using conventional production methods and equipment. In the analyses of production-decline curves, reserves were estimated only to the limit of economic rates of production under existing economic and operating conditions using prices and costs consistent with the effective date of this report, including consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements but not including escalations based upon future conditions. The petroleum reserves are classifie d as follows:

 

3
 

 

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

 

Proved oil and gas reserves – Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations—prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

 

(i) The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes:

(A) The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and (B) Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data.

 

(ii) In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with reasonable certainty.

 

(iii) Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty.

 

(iv) Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when:

 

(A) Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based; and (B) The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities.

 

4
 

 

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

 

(v) Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions.

 

Developed oil and gas reserves – Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered:

(i) Through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and

 

(ii) Through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well.

 

Undeveloped oil and gas reserves – Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.

 

(i) Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances.

 

(ii) Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances justify a longer time.

 

5
 

 

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

 

(iii) Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, as defined in [section 210.4–10 (a) Definitions], or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.

 

Primary Economic Assumptions

 

The following economic assumptions were used for estimating existing and future prices and costs:

 

Oil, Condensate, and NGL Prices

 

ECOPETROL has represented that the oil, condensate, and NGL prices were based on a 12-month average price, calculated as the unweighted average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period prior to the end of the reporting period, unless prices are defined by contractual agreements. ECOPETROL has represented that the 12-month average adjusted product prices for the properties in Colombia evaluated herein were U.S.$94.61 per barrel for crude oil and condensate and U.S.$41.49 per barrel for NGL, based on a 12-month average Brent reference price of U.S.$111.13 per barrel. ECOPETROL supplied differentials by field to the Brent reference price, and the prices were held constant thereafter. ECOPETROL has also represented that the 12-month average adjusted product prices for the properties in Peru evaluated herein were U.S.$113.51 per barrel for crude oil and condensate and U.S.$66.49 per barrel for NGL based on the 12-month average Ardjuna and Minas crude reference prices, and the prices were held constant thereafter.

 

6
 

 

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

 

Natural Gas Prices

 

ECOPETROL has represented that the natural gas prices were based on a 12-month average price, calculated as the unweighted average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period prior to the end of the reporting period, unless prices are defined by contractual agreements. ECOPETROL has represented that the natural gas prices for the properties in Colombia evaluated herein are defined by contractual agreements based on specific market conditions, and the average adjusted product price was U.S.$4.02 per thousand cubic feet, and the prices were held constant thereafter. ECOPETROL has also represented that the natural gas prices for the properties in Peru evaluated herein are defined by contractual agreements based on specific market conditions, and the average adjusted product price was U.S.$3.06 per thousand cubic feet, and the prices were held constant thereafter.

 

Operating Expenses and Capital Costs

 

Operating expenses and capital costs, based on information provided by ECOPETROL, were used in estimating future costs required to operate the properties. In certain cases, future costs, either higher or lower than existing costs, may have been used because of anticipated changes in operating conditions. These costs were not escalated for inflation.

 

While the oil and gas industry may be subject to regulatory changes from time to time that could affect an industry participant’s ability to recover its oil and gas reserves, we are not aware of any such governmental actions which would restrict the recovery of the December 31, 2012, estimated proved oil and gas reserves. The reserves estimated in this report can be produced under current regulatory guidelines.

 

Our estimates of ECOPETROL’s net proved reserves attributable to the reviewed properties are based on the definitions of proved reserves of the SEC and are as follows, expressed in millions of barrels (MMbbl), millions of cubic feet (MMcf), and millions of barrels of oil equivalent (MMboe):

 

    Estimated by DeGolyer and MacNaughton
Net Proved Reserves
as of
December 31, 2012
 
    Oil, Condensate, and
NGL
(MMbbl)
    Natural
Gas
(MMcf)
    Oil Equivalent
(MMboe)
 
                   
South America                        
Proved Developed     134.283       12,739.646       136.552  
Proved Undeveloped     117.761       12,831.042       120.046  
                         
South America Total Proved     252.044       25,570.688       256.598  

 

7
 

 

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

 

Note: Gas is converted to oil equivalent using a factor of 5,615 cubic feet of gas per 1 barrel of oil equivalent.

 

In our opinion, the information relating to estimated proved reserves of oil, condensate, natural gas liquids, and gas contained in this report has been prepared in accordance with Paragraphs 932-235-50-4, 932-235-50-6, 932-235-50-7, and 932-235-50-9 of the Accounting Standards Update 932-235-50, Extractive Industries – Oil and Gas (Topic 932): Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures (January 2010) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board and Rules 4–10(a) (1)–(32) of Regulation S–X and Rules 302(b), 1201, 1202(a) (1), (2), (3), (4), (8), and 1203(a) of Regulation S–K of the Securities and Exchange Commission; provided, however, that estimates of proved developed and proved undeveloped reserves are not presented at the beginning of the year.

 

To the extent the above-enumerated rules, regulations, and statements require determinations of an accounting or legal nature, we, as engineers, are necessarily unable to express an opinion as to whether the above-described information is in accordance therewith or sufficient therefor.

 

8
 

 

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

 

DeGolyer and MacNaughton is an independent petroleum engineering consulting firm that has been providing petroleum consulting services throughout the world since 1936. DeGolyer and MacNaughton does not have any financial interest, including stock ownership, in ECOPETROL. Our fees were not contingent on the results of our evaluation. This letter report has been prepared at the request of ECOPETROL. DeGolyer and MacNaughton has used all assumptions, data, procedures, and methods that it considers necessary and appropriate to prepare this report.

 

  Submitted,
   
  /s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton DeGOLYER
and MacNAUGHTON
  Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716

  

      /s/ Thomas C. Pence, P.E.
      Thomas C. Pence, P.E.
  [SEAL]   Senior Vice President
      DeGolyer and MacNaughton

 

 

9
 

 

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

 

CERTIFICATE of QUALIFICATION

 

I, Thomas C. Pence, Petroleum Engineer with DeGolyer and MacNaughton, 5001 Spring Valley Road, Suite 800 East, Dallas, Texas, 75244 U.S.A., hereby certify:

 

1. That I am a Senior Vice President with DeGolyer and MacNaughton, which company did prepare the letter report addressed to ECOPETROL dated February 26, 2013, and that I, as Senior Vice President, was responsible for the preparation of this report.

 

2. That I attended Texas A&M University, and that I graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering in the year 1982; that I am a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Texas; that I am a member of the International Society of Petroleum Engineers; and that I have in excess of 30 years of experience in oil and gas reservoir studies and reserves evaluations.

 

      /s/ Thomas C. Pence, P.E.
      Thomas C. Pence, P.E.
  [SEAL]   Senior Vice President
      DeGolyer and MacNaughton