UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 

 

  

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

 

x Annual Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013

 

or

 

¨ Transition Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For The Transition Period From _______________ to _______________ .

 

Commission file number 1-08789

 

 

 

American Shared Hospital Services

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

California 94-2918118
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

 

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3700, San Francisco, California 94111-4107
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (415) 788-5300

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock No Par Value NYSE Amex

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated Filer ¨ Non-accelerated Filer ¨ Smaller reporting company x

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

 

As of June 30, 2013, the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $7,342,000.

 

Number of shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding as of March 1, 2014: 4,608,870.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

 

1
 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
     
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS 3
     
PART I:    
     
Item 1 Business 4
     
Item 1A Risk Factors 13
     
Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments 15
     
Item 2 Properties 16
     
Item 3 Legal Proceedings 16
     
Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures 16
     
PART II:    
     
Item 5 Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder  Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 16
     
Item 6 Selected Financial Data 18
     
Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition  and Results of Operations 19
     
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk 29
     
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 29
     
Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting  and Financial Disclosure 29
     
Item 9A Controls and Procedures 29
     
Item 9B Other Information 30
     
PART III:    
     
Item 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 30
     
Item 11 Executive Compensation 30
     
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management  and Related Stockholder Matters 30
     
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 30
     
Item 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services 31
     
PART IV:    
     
Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 31

 

2
 

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Certain matters discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K other than statements of historical information are “forward-looking statements.” The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 has established that these statements qualify for safe harbors from liability. Forward-looking statements may include words like we “believe”, “anticipate”, “target”, “expect”, “pro forma”, “estimate”, “intend”, “will”, “is designed to”, “plan” and words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements describe our future plans, objectives, expectations or goals. Such statements address future events and conditions concerning and include, but are not limited to, such things as:

 

· capital expenditures
· earnings
· liquidity and capital resources
· financing of our business
· government programs and regulations
· legislation affecting the health care industry
· the development of our proton beam business
· accounting matters
· compliance with debt covenants
· competition
· technology
· interest rates

 

These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. Factors that would cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, such things as:

 

· our high level of debt
· the limited market for our capital intensive services
· the impact of lowered federal reimbursement rates
· the impact of recent U.S. health care reform legislation
· competition and alternatives to our services
· technological advances and the risk of equipment obsolescence
· our significant investment in an unproven development stage company in the proton beam business
· the small and illiquid market for our stock

 

These lists are not all-inclusive because it is not possible to predict all factors. A discussion of some of these factors is included in this document under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” “–Summary of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” and “–Liquidity and Capital Resources.” This report should be read in its entirety. No one section of this report deals with all aspects of the subject matter. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date such statement was made, and we are not obligated to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement was made, except as required by applicable laws or regulations.

 

3
 

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

 

GENERAL

 

American Shared Hospital Services (“ASHS” and, together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) provides Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery equipment and radiation therapy and related equipment to seventeen (17) medical centers in sixteen (16) states in the United States and two medical centers in Turkey, as of March 1, 2014. The Company provides Gamma Knife services through its 81% indirect interest in GK Financing, LLC, a California limited liability company (“GKF”). The remaining 19% of GKF is owned by GKV Investments, Inc., a wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of Elekta AG, a Swedish company (“Elekta”). Elekta is the manufacturer of the Leksell Gamma Knife â (the “Gamma Knife”). GKF is a non-exclusive provider of alternative financing services for Elekta Gamma Knife units.

 

GKF has established the wholly-owned subsidiaries, GK Financing U.K., Limited (“GKUK”), Instituto de Gamma Knife del Pacifico S.A.C. (“GKPeru”), the 70% majority owned subsidiary EWRS, LLC (“EWRS”), and the wholly-owned subsidiaries GKFDB#1, LLC (“GKFDB1”) and GKFDB#2, LLC (“GKFDB2”) for the purpose of providing similar Gamma Knife services in England, Peru, Turkey and Brazil, respectively. The remaining 30% of EWRS is owned by EMKA, LLC, a wholly owned limited liability company owned by Mert Ozyurek, Director of American Shared Hospital Services.

 

EWRS owns 100% of EWRS Tibbi Cihazlar Ticaret Ltd Sti (“EWRS Turkey”). GKFDB1 and GKFDB2 each own 50% of a Brazilian subsidiary, GKF do Brasil Equipamentos Medicos LTDA (“GKF do Brasil”). GKF also owns a 51% interest in Albuquerque GK Equipment, LLC (“AGKE”) and Jacksonville GK Equipment, LLC (“JGKE”). The remaining 49% in each of these two companies is owned by radiation oncologists.

 

GKUK is inactive, and GKF do Brasil is not expected to generate revenue during the next twelve months. The Company is in the final stages of liquidating GKF do Brasil.

 

Gamma Knife revenue accounted for 92% of the Company’s revenue in 2013. The Company also provides Image Guided Radiation Therapy (“IGRT”) and related equipment to two medical centers located in Massachusetts and Turkey which accounted for 8% of the Company’s revenue in 2013.

 

In April 2006, the Company invested $2,000,000 for a minority equity interest in Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. (formerly Still River Systems, Inc.) (“Mevion”), a Littleton, Massachusetts company which, in collaboration with scientists from MIT’s Plasma Science and Fusion Center, is developing a medical device for the treatment of cancer patients using proton beam radiation therapy (“PBRT”). In September 2007, December 2011, and June 2012 the Company invested approximately $617,000, $70,000 and $31,000, respectively, for additional equity interests in Mevion. The Company has deposited an additional $3,000,000 towards the purchase of three Mevion S250 PBRT systems (“Mevion S250”) from Mevion for anticipated delivery beginning in 2014. The Mevion units are single treatment PBRT systems. In 2012, Mevion received clearance for the Mevion S250 with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), and in 2011 it received Conformite Europeene Mark (“CE Mark”) certification. Mevion’s first MEVION S250 system, located at Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, MO (“Barnes-Jewish Hospital”), treated its first patient on December 19, 2013.

 

The Company may also expand its financing model to include two-room PBRT systems to major medical centers in the United States and abroad. This effort remains in the development stage and no significant revenues are expected in the next two years.

 

The Company continues to develop its design and business model for “The Operating Room for the 21 st Century” SM (“OR21” SM ). OR21 is not expected to generate significant revenue within the next two years.

 

The Company also wholly-owns the subsidiaries ASHSDB#1, LLC (“ASHSDB1”) and ASHSDB#2, LLC (“ASHSDB2”) which each own 50% of a Brazilian subsidiary, ASHS do Brasil Equipamentos Medicos LTDA (“ASHS do Brasil”), which was formed to provide medical equipment services other than the Gamma Knife to hospitals and medical centers in Brazil. The Company is in the process of liquidating ASHS do Brasil.

 

4
 

 

The Company was incorporated in the State of California in 1983 and its predecessor, Ernest A. Bates, M.D., Ltd. (d/b/a American Shared Hospital Services), a California limited partnership, was formed in June 1980.

 

OPERATIONS

 

Gamma Knife Operations

 

Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery, a non-invasive procedure, is an alternative to conventional brain surgery or can be an adjunct to conventional brain surgery, radiation therapy, or chemotherapy. Compared to conventional surgery, Gamma Knife radiosurgery usually is an out-patient procedure with lower risk of complications and can be provided at a lower cost. Typically, Gamma Knife patients resume their pre-surgical activities one or two days after treatment. The Gamma Knife treats patients with 201 single doses of gamma rays that are focused with great precision on small and medium sized, well circumscribed and critically located structures in the brain. During 2006 Elekta introduced a new Gamma Knife model, the Perfexion™ unit (“Perfexion”), which treats patients with 192 single doses of gamma rays and will also provide the ability to perform procedures on areas of the upper cervical spine. The Gamma Knife delivers a concentrated dose of gamma rays from Cobalt-60 sources housed in the Gamma Knife. The Cobalt-60 sources converge at the target area and deliver a dose that is high enough to destroy the diseased tissue without damaging surrounding healthy tissue.

 

The Gamma Knife treats selected malignant and benign brain tumors, arteriovenous malformations, and functional disorders including trigeminal neuralgia (facial pain). Research is being conducted to determine whether the Gamma Knife can be effective in the treatment of epilepsy and other functional disorders.

 

As of December 31, 2013, there were approximately 130 Gamma Knife sites in the United States and more than 300 units in operation worldwide. Based on the most recent available data, an estimated percentage breakdown of Gamma Knife procedures performed in the U.S. by indications treated is as follows: malignant (47%) and benign (29%) brain tumors, vascular disorders (8%), and functional disorders (16%).

 

The Company, as of March 1, 2014, has nineteen (19) operating Gamma Knife units located at seventeen (17) sites in the United States and two sites in Turkey. In addition, the Company owns three Gamma Knife units that are pending trade-in or placement elsewhere at future Gamma Knife sites. The Company’s first Gamma Knife commenced operation in September 1991. The Company’s Gamma Knife units performed approximately 2,500 procedures in 2013 for a cumulative total of approximately 31,000 procedures through December 31, 2013.

 

Revenue from Gamma Knife services for the Company during each of the last five (5) years ended December 31, and the percentage of total revenue of the Company represented by the Gamma Knife for each of the last five years, are set forth below:

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

   

 

Total Gamma Knife

Revenue (in thousands)

   

 

Gamma Knife % of

Total Revenue

 
  2013     $ 16,127       91.7 %
  2012     $ 15,154       88.9 %
  2011                        $21,077 (1)     94.9 %
  2010     $ 15,600       93.6 %
  2009     $ 15,505       92.5 %

 

(1) includes $4,984,000 of equipment sales revenue from the sale of a Gamma Knife system to an existing Gamma Knife customer at the end of the contract term.

 

The Company conducts its Gamma Knife business through its 81% indirect interest in GKF. The remaining 19% interest is indirectly owned by Elekta. GKF, formed in October 1995, is managed by its policy committee. The policy committee is composed of one representative from the Company, Ernest A. Bates, M.D., ASHS’s Chairman and CEO, and one representative from Elekta. The policy committee sets the operating policy for GKF. The policy committee may act only with the unanimous approval of both of its members. The policy committee selects a manager to handle GKF’s daily operations. Craig K. Tagawa, Chief Executive Officer of GKF and Chief Operating and Financial Officer of ASHS, serves as GKF’s manager.

 

5
 

 

GKF’s profits and/or losses and any cash distributions are allocated based on membership interests. GKF’s operating agreement requires that it have a cash reserve of at least $50,000 before cash distributions are made to its members. From inception to December 31, 2013, GKF has distributed $40,014,000 to the Company and $9,386,000 to the non-controlling member.

 

Image Guided Radiation Therapy Operations

 

The Company’s radiation therapy business currently consists of one IGRT system that began operation in September 2007, and another that began operation in December 2011, both at existing Gamma Knife customer sites. Revenue generated under IGRT services accounted for approximately 8% of the Company’s total revenue in 2013.

 

IGRT technology integrates imaging and detection components into a state-of-the-art linear accelerator, allowing clinicians to plan treatment, verify positioning, and deliver treatment with a single device, providing faster, more effective radiation therapy with less damage to healthy tissue.  IGRT captures cone beam imaging, fluoroscopic and/or x-ray images on a daily basis, creating three-dimensional images that pinpoint the exact size, location and coordinates of tumors. Once tumors are pinpointed, the system delivers ultra-precise doses of radiation which ultimately leads to improved patient outcomes.

 

Based on the most recently available information, there are approximately 4,000 linear accelerator based radiation therapy units installed in the United States, and it is estimated that a majority of these units provide IMRT, IGRT or a combination of this advanced radiation therapy capability. Radiation therapy services are provided through approximately 2,350 hospital based and free-standing oncology centers.

 

Additional information on our operations can be found in Item 6–“Selected Financial Data”, Item 7–“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 1 of our consolidated financial statements beginning on page A-8 of this report.

 

CUSTOMERS

 

The Company’s current business is the outsourcing of stereotactic radiosurgery services and radiation therapy services. The Company typically provides the equipment, as well as planning, installation, reimbursement and marketing support services. The majority of the Company’s customers pay the Company on a fee per use basis. The market for these services primarily consists of major urban medical centers. The business is capital intensive; the total cost of a Gamma Knife or IGRT facility usually ranges from $3 million to $5.5 million, including equipment, site construction and installation. The Company pays for the equipment and the medical center generally pays for site and installation costs. The following is a listing of the Company’s sites as of March 1, 2014:

 

Customers (Gamma Knife except as noted)   Original Term of
Contract
  Year Contract
Began
  Basis of Payment
             
Southwest Texas Methodist Hospital   10 years   1998   Fee per use
San Antonio, Texas            
Yale New Haven Hospital   10 years   1998   Fee per use
New Haven, Connecticut            
Kettering Medical Center   10 years   1999   Revenue sharing
Kettering, Ohio            
Tufts Medical Center   10 years   1999   Fee per use
Boston, Massachusetts            
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences   15 years   1999   Revenue sharing
Little Rock, Arkansas            
Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital   10 years   1999   Fee per use
Milwaukee, Wisconsin            
JFK Medical Center   10 years   2000   Fee per use
Edison, New Jersey            
Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center   10 years   2001   Fee per use
Las Vegas, Nevada            
Central Mississippi Medical Center   10 years   2001   Fee per use
Jackson, Mississippi            
OSF Saint Francis Medical Center   10 years   2001   Fee per use
Peoria, Illinois            
Albuquerque Regional Medical Center   10 years   2003   Fee per use
Albuquerque, New Mexico            
Northern Westchester Hospital   10 years   2005   Fee per use
Mt. Kisco, New York            
Mercy Health Center   10 years   2005   Revenue Sharing
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma            
Tufts Medical Center  (IGRT)   10 years   2007   Revenue Sharing
Boston, Massachusetts            
USC University Hospital   10 years   2008   Fee per use
Los Angeles, California            
Ft. Sanders Regional Medical Center   10 years   2011   Revenue Sharing
Knoxville, Tennessee            
St. Vincent’s Medical Center   10 years   2011   Revenue Sharing
Jacksonville, Florida            
Sacred Heart Medical Center   10 years   2013   Revenue Sharing
Pensacola, Florida            
Baskent University Application and Research Center   8 years   2011   Revenue Sharing
Adana, Turkey            

Baskent University Application and Research Center

(IGRT)

  5 years   2011   Revenue Sharing
Adana, Turkey            
Florence Nightingale Hospital   12 years   2012   Revenue Sharing
Istanbul, Turkey            

 

6
 

 

The Company’s fee per use agreement is typically for a ten year term. The fixed fee per use reimbursement amount that the Company receives from the customer is based on the Company’s cost to provide the service and the anticipated volume of the customer. The Gamma Knife contracts signed by the Company typically call for a fee ranging from $7,500 to $9,500 per procedure. There are no minimum volume guarantees required of the customer. Typically, GKF is responsible for providing the Gamma Knife and related ongoing Gamma Knife equipment expenses (i.e., personal property taxes, insurance, and equipment maintenance) and also helps fund the customer’s Gamma Knife marketing. The customer generally is obligated to pay site and installation costs and the costs of operating the Gamma Knife. The customer can either renew the agreement or terminate the agreement at the end of the contractual term. If the customer chooses to terminate the agreement, then GKF removes the equipment from the medical center for possible placement at another site.

 

The Company’s revenue sharing agreements (“retail”) are for a period of five to fifteen years. Instead of receiving a fixed fee, the Company receives all or a percentage of the reimbursement (exclusive of physician fees) received by the customer. The Company is at risk for any reimbursement rate changes for radiosurgery or radiation therapy services by the government or other third party payors. Other than one site, there are no minimum volume guarantees required of the customer.

 

7
 

 

In 2013, two customers accounted for approximately 10%, each, of the Company’s total revenue. In 2012, two customers accounted for approximately 13% and 11% each of the Company’s total revenue. In 2011, one customer accounted for approximately 25% of the Company’s total revenue. Included in total revenue for 2011 was $4,984,000 in equipment sales revenue to this customer whose contract ended. Excluding this transaction, in 2011 there were two customers who accounted for approximately 13% and 11% each of total revenue.

 

MARKETING

 

The Company markets its services through its preferred provider status with Elekta and a direct sales effort led by its Vice President of Sales and Business Development and its Chief Operating Officer. The major advantages to a health care provider in contracting with the Company for Gamma Knife services include:

 

§ The medical center avoids the high cost of owning the equipment. By not acquiring the Gamma Knife unit or other medical equipment, the medical center is able to allocate the funds otherwise required to purchase and/or finance the Gamma Knife to other projects.

 

§ The Company does not have minimum volume requirements, so the medical center avoids the risk of equipment under-utilization. The medical center pays the Company only for each procedure performed on a patient.

 

§ For contracts under revenue sharing arrangements, the Company assumes all or a portion of the risk of reimbursement rate changes. The medical center pays the Company only the contracted portion of revenue received from each procedure.

 

§ The medical center transfers the risk of technological obsolescence to the Company. The medical center and its physicians are not under any obligation to utilize technologically obsolete equipment.

 

§ The Company provides planning, installation, operating and marketing assistance and support to its customers.

 

FINANCING

 

The Company’s U.S. IGRT site is owned by ASHS and is financed at approximately 100% of the total project cost, under a loan that fully amortizes over an 84 month period and is fully collateralized by the equipment, the customer contract and accounts receivable.

 

The Company’s Gamma Knife business is operated through GKF. GKF generally finances its U.S. Gamma Knife units, upgrades and additions with loans or capital leases from various finance companies for 100% of the cost of each Gamma Knife, plus any sales tax, customs and duties. GKF’s international operations are financed at approximately 85% of the cost of the equipment. The financing is predominantly fully amortized over an 84 month period and is collateralized by the equipment, customer contracts and accounts receivable, and is generally without recourse to the Company and Elekta.

 

COMPETITION

 

Conventional neurosurgery, radiation therapy and other radiosurgery devices are the primary competitors of Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Gamma Knife radiosurgery has gained acceptance as an alternative and/or adjunct to conventional surgery due to its more favorable morbidity outcomes for certain procedures as well as its non-invasiveness. Utilization of the Company’s Gamma Knife units is contingent on the acceptance of Gamma Knife radiosurgery by the customer’s neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists and referring physicians. In addition, the utilization of the Company’s Gamma Knife units is impacted by the proximity of competing Gamma Knife centers and providers using other radiosurgery devices.

 

8
 

 

The Company’s ability to secure additional customers for Gamma Knife services and other radiosurgery and radiation therapy services is dependent on its ability to effectively compete against (i) Elekta, the manufacturer of the Gamma Knife, (ii) manufacturers of other radiosurgery and radiation therapy devices, and (iii) other companies that outsource these services. The Company does not have an exclusive relationship with Elekta or other manufacturers and has previously lost sales to customers that chose to purchase equipment directly from manufacturers. The Company may continue to lose future sales to such customers and may also lose sales to the Company’s competitors.

 

GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS

 

The Medicare program is administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”). Medicare is a health insurance program primarily for individuals 65 years of age and older, certain younger people with disabilities, and people with end-stage renal disease, and is provided without regard to income or assets.

 

The Medicare program is subject to statutory and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, interpretations and determinations, requirements for utilization review, and federal and state funding restrictions, all of which could materially increase or decrease payments from these government programs in the future, as well as affect the cost of providing services to patients and the timing of payments to our client hospitals.

 

The Company’s Gamma Knife and radiation therapy customers receive payments for patient care from federal government and private insurer reimbursement programs. Currently in the United States, Gamma Knife services are performed primarily on an out-patient basis. Gamma Knife patients with Medicare as their primary insurer, treated on either an in-patient or out-patient basis, comprise an estimated 30-40% of the total Gamma Knife patients treated nationwide. Radiation therapy patients with Medicare as their primary insurer are treated primarily on an out-patient basis, and comprise an estimated 45% to 50% of the total radiation therapy patients treated. The Company estimates that its percentage of patients with Medicare as their primary insurer approximates these national averages.

 

A Prospective Payment System ("PPS") is utilized to reimburse hospitals for care given to hospital in-patients covered by federally funded reimbursement programs. Patients are classified into a Diagnosis Related Group ("DRG") in accordance with the patient's diagnosis, necessary medical procedures and other factors. Patient reimbursement is limited to a predetermined amount for each DRG. The reimbursement payment may not necessarily cover the cost of all medical services actually provided because the payment is predetermined. Effective October 1, 1997, Gamma Knife services for Medicare hospital in-patients are reimbursed under various DRG codes.

 

In 1986 and again in 1990, Congress enacted legislation requiring the DHHS to develop proposals for a PPS for Medicare out-patient services. DHHS proposed a new payment system, Ambulatory Payment Classifications (“APC”), which affects all out-patient services performed in a hospital based facility. APC implementation took place in the third quarter of 2000.

 

The APC consists of 346 clinically homogenous classifications or groupings of codes that are typically used in out-patient billing. Out-patient services are bundled with fixed rates of payment determined according to specific regional and national factors, similar to that of the in-patient PPS.

 

The Gamma Knife APC rate is modified periodically but the total reimbursement amount has historically remained fairly constant. Effective January 1, 2012, total Gamma Knife reimbursement based on all commonly used billing codes decreased by approximately 2% (to approximately $9,308) compared to 2011. This follows a 4% increase in 2011, a 3% decrease in 2010 and a 5% decrease in 2009 compared to the prior years, respectively. The Company has six Gamma Knife contracts from which its revenue is directly affected by changes in payment rates under the APC system.

 

On January 2, 2013, Congress enacted The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which reduced the reimbursement rate for outpatient Gamma Knife treatment to the reimbursement rate for one (1) linear accelerator outpatient treatment session. This is significant because Gamma Knife treatment usually requires only one session as opposed to multiple treatments for linear accelerators. Thus, while reimbursement for a complete program of linear accelerator treatment will usually be a multiple of the reimbursement rate for a single treatment session, reimbursement for Gamma Knife treatment will be limited to the equivalent of one linear accelerator treatment session. It was for this reason (and due to the higher costs of obtaining and maintaining Gamma Knife equipment) that CMS has historically supported a higher reimbursement rate for Gamma Knife treatment than the reimbursement rates for linear accelerator treatment. The net effect is that, commencing April 1, 2013, Gamma Knife delivery code reimbursement was reduced from $7,910 to $3,300. All other Gamma Knife reimbursement codes remain unchanged. This directly affected the Company under its six Gamma Knife contracts from which the Company's revenue is directly affected by changes in payment rates under the APC system. In addition, with respect to its other contracts under which the Company is paid a fixed payment for each Gamma Knife procedure, even though the fixed contract rate payable to the Company will not change, in light of the lower Gamma Knife revenues that will be received by the Company's customers (i.e., hospitals), three of the Company’s customer contracts were revised. Effective January 1, 2014, the Gamma Knife delivery code reimbursement was increased approximately 9%.

 

9
 

 

IGRT is a relatively new service to radiation oncology. The 2005 through 2007 APC payment rates averaged approximately $80 for each of five procedure codes. In 2008 DHHS determined that these services were to be packaged into other services. As a result, there are currently no specific outpatient payment rates for IGRT, and reimbursement is made through various packaged codes. However, standard radiation therapy services are reimbursed by CMS and other third party payors.

 

We are unable to predict the effect of future government health care funding policy changes on operations. If the rates paid by governmental payers are reduced, if the scope of services covered by governmental payers is limited, or if one or more of our hospital clients are excluded from participation in the Medicare program or any other government health care program, there could be a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Affordable Care Act

In March 2010, President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, (“Affordable Care Act”) into law, which will result in significant changes to the health care industry. The primary goal of the legislation is to extend health care coverage to approximately 32 million uninsured legal U.S. residents through both an expansion of public programs and reforms to private sector health insurance. The expansion of insurance coverage is expected to be funded in part by measures designed to promote quality and cost efficiency in health care delivery and by budgetary savings in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Because the Company is not a health care provider, we are not directly affected by the law, but we could be indirectly affected principally as follows:

 

· An increase in the number of insured residents could potentially increase the number of patients seeking Gamma Knife or radiation therapy treatment.

 

· The Company’s retail contracts are subject to reimbursement rate changes for radiosurgery or radiation therapy services by the government or other third party payors. Any changes to Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement through the implementation of the Affordable Care Act could affect revenue generated from these sites.

 

We are unable to predict with certainty the full impact of the Affordable Care Act on our future revenues and operations at this time due to the law’s complexity, the limited amount of guidance available and possible amendments.

 

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

 

The payment of remuneration to induce the referral of health care business has been a subject of increasing governmental and regulatory focus in recent years. Section 1128B(b) of the Social Security Act (sometimes referred to as the "federal anti-kickback statute") provides criminal penalties for individuals or entities that offer, pay, solicit or receive remuneration in order to induce referrals for items or services for which payment may be made under the Medicare and Medicaid programs and certain other government funded programs. The Affordable Care Act amended the anti-kickback statute to eliminate the requirement of actual knowledge, or specific intent to commit a violation, of the anti-kickback statute. The Social Security Act provides authority to the Office of Inspector General through civil proceedings to exclude an individual or entity from participation in the Medicare and state health programs if it is determined any such party has violated Section 1128B(b) of the Social Security Act. The Company believes that it is in compliance with the federal anti-kickback statute. Additionally, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, often referred to as "Stark II", bans physician self-referrals to providers of designated health services with which the physician has a financial relationship. On September 5, 2007, the third and final phase of the Stark regulations (Phase III) was published. The term "designated health services" includes, among others, radiation therapy services and in-patient and out-patient hospital services. On January 1, 1995, the Physician Ownership and Referral Act of 1993 became effective in California. This legislation prohibits physician self-referrals for covered goods and services, including radiation oncology, if the physician (or the physician's immediate family) concurrently has a financial interest in the entity receiving the referral. The Company believes that it is in compliance with these rules and regulations.

 

10
 

 

On August 19, 2008, the CMS published a final rule relating to inpatient hospital services paid under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System for discharges in the Fiscal Year 2009 (the “Final Rule”). Among other things, the Final Rule prohibits “per-click payments” to certain physician lessors for services rendered to patients who were referred by the physician lessor. This prohibition on per-click payments for leased equipment used in the treatment of a patient referred to a hospital lessee by a physician lessor applies regardless of whether the physician himself or herself is the lessor or whether the lessor is an entity in which the referring physician has an ownership or investment interest. The effective date of this prohibition was October 1, 2009. However, referrals made by a radiation oncologist for radiation therapy or ancillary services necessary for, and integral to, the provision of radiation therapy (such as Gamma Knife services) are not subject to this prohibition so long as certain conditions are met. GK Financing’s majority owned subsidiaries, Albuquerque GK Equipment, LLC (“AGKE”) and Jacksonville GK Equipment, LLC (“JGKE”) have minority ownership interests that are held solely by radiation oncologists, who are otherwise exempt from the referral prohibition under the Final Rule. The Company believes it is in compliance with the Final Rule.

 

A range of federal civil and criminal laws target false claims and fraudulent billing activities. One of the most significant is the Federal False Claims Act, which prohibits the submission of a false claim or the making of a false record or statement in order to secure a reimbursement from a government-sponsored program. In recent years, the federal government has launched several initiatives aimed at uncovering practices which violate false claims or fraudulent billing laws. Claims under these laws may be brought either by the government or by private individuals on behalf of the government, through a "whistleblower" or "qui tam" action. The Company believes that it is in compliance with the Federal False Claims Act; however, because such actions are filed under seal and may remain secret for years, there can be no assurance that the Company or one of its affiliates is not named in a material qui tam action.

 

Legislation in various jurisdictions requires that health facilities obtain a Certificate of Need ("CON") prior to making expenditures for medical technology in excess of specified amounts. Four of the Company’s existing customers were required to obtain a CON or its equivalent. The CON procedure can be expensive and time consuming and may impact the length of time before Gamma Knife services commence. CON requirements vary from state to state in their application to the operations of both the Company and its customers. In some jurisdictions the Company is required to comply with CON procedures to provide its services and in other jurisdictions customers must comply with CON procedures before using the Company's services. The Company is unable to predict if any jurisdiction will eliminate or alter its CON requirements in a manner that will increase competition and, thereby, affect the Company's competitive position.

 

The Company's Gamma Knife units contain Cobalt 60 radioactive sources. The medical centers that house the Company's Gamma Knife units are responsible for obtaining possession and user's licenses for the Cobalt 60 source from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

 

Standard linear accelerator equipment utilized to treat patients is regulated by the FDA. The licensing is obtained by the individual medical center operating the equipment.

 

The Company believes it is in substantial compliance with the various rules and regulations that affect its businesses.

 

11
 

 

INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

 

The Company's contracts with equipment vendors generally do not contain indemnification provisions. The Company maintains a comprehensive insurance program covering the value of its property and equipment, subject to deductibles, which the Company believes are reasonable.

 

The Company's customer contracts generally contain mutual indemnification provisions. The Company maintains general and professional liability insurance. The Company is not involved in the practice of medicine and therefore believes its present insurance coverage and indemnification agreements are adequate for its business.

 

PROTON BEAM RADIATION THERAPY BUSINESS

 

PBRT is an alternative to traditional external beam, photon based radiation delivered by linear accelerators. PBRT, first clinically introduced in the 1950s, has physics advantages compared to photon based systems which allow PBRT to deliver higher radiation doses to the tumor with less radiation to healthy tissue. PBRT currently treats prostate, eye, cranial-spinal, head and neck, lung, liver and breast tumors. In excess of 80,000 patients have been treated with protons worldwide.

 

Introduction of PBRT in the United States, until recently, has been limited due to lack of adequate reimbursement and the high capital costs of these projects. The Company believes that the current development of one and two treatment room PBRT systems at lower capital costs, and the recent implementation of reimbursement rates for PBRT from the CMS will help make this technology available to a larger segment of the market.

 

There are several competing manufacturers of proton beam systems, including Mevion, IBA Particle Therapy Inc., Hitachi Ltd., Optivus Proton Therapy Inc., Varian Medical Systems, Inc. (Accel), Sumitomo Heavy Industries, ProTom International, Inc. and Mitsubishi Electric. The Company has invested in Mevion and has made deposits towards the purchase of three of the Mevion S250 systems. The Mevion system potentially provides cancer centers the opportunity to introduce single treatment room PBRT services with cost in the range of approximately $25 to $30 million rather than four and five PBRT treatment room programs costing in excess of $120 million. The Mevion system received FDA approval in the second quarter of 2012 and the first clinical treatment occurred in December 2013.

 

The Company believes the business model it has developed for use in its Gamma Knife and radiation therapy businesses can be tailored for the PBRT market segment. The Company is targeting large, hospital based cancer programs. The Company’s ability to develop a successful PBRT financing entity depends on the decision of cancer centers to self-fund or to fund the PBRT through conventional financing vehicles, the Company’s ability to capture market share from competing alternative PBRT financing entities, and the Company’s ability to raise capital to fund PBRT projects.

 

EMPLOYEES

 

At December 31, 2013, the Company employed nine 9 people on a full-time basis. None of these employees is subject to a collective bargaining agreement and there is no union representation within the Company. The Company maintains various employee benefit plans and believes that its employee relations are good.

 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

 

The following table provides current information concerning those persons who serve as executive officers of the Company. The executive officers were appointed by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

 

Name: Age: Position:
Ernest A. Bates, M.D. 77 Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
Craig K. Tagawa 60 Senior Vice President - Chief Operating and Financial Officer
Ernest R. Bates 47 Vice President of Sales and Business Development

 

12
 

 

Ernest A. Bates, M.D., founder of the Company, has served in the positions listed above since the incorporation of the Company.  A board-certified neurosurgeon, Dr. Bates is Emeritus Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Johns Hopkins University and serves on the Board of Visitors of the Johns Hopkins Medical Center and the Johns Hopkins Neurosurgery Advisory Board.  He serves on the boards of Shared Imaging and FasterCures.  Dr. Bates was appointed to the California Commission for Jobs and Economic Growth and the Magistrate Judge Merit Selection Panel. From 1981-1987 he was a member of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, and he served on the California High Speed Rail Authority from 1997 to 2003.  Dr. Bates is a member of the Board of Overseers at the University of California, San Francisco, School of Nursing.  Dr. Bates is a Partner in Black Coyote Chateau Wines, LLC.  He is a graduate of the School of Arts and Sciences of the Johns Hopkins University, and he earned his medical degree at the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry.

 

Craig K. Tagawa has served as Chief Operating Officer since February 1999 in addition to serving as Chief Financial Officer since May 1996. Mr. Tagawa also served as Chief Financial Officer from January 1992 through October 1995. Previously a Vice President in such capacity, Mr. Tagawa became a Senior Vice President on February 28, 1993. He is also the Chief Executive Officer of GKF. From September 1988 through January 1992, Mr. Tagawa served in various positions with the Company. He is a former Chair of the Industrial Policy Advisory Committee of the Engineering Research Center for Computer-Integrated Surgical Systems and Technology at The Johns Hopkins University. He received his undergraduate degree from the University of California at Berkeley and his M.B.A. from Cornell University.

 

Ernest R. Bates joined the Company in January 2007 as Vice President of Sales and Business Development. He was on the Board of Directors of the Company from 2004 through February 2007. Prior to joining the Company, he had been Managing Director, Institutional Fixed Income Sales of HSBC Securities (USA), Inc. since 2003. Mr. Bates has also served as Managing Director, Head of Asian Product for HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. from 1999 to 2003. From 1993 through 1999, Mr. Bates held various positions with Merrill Lynch, last serving as Vice President, European Syndicate for Merrill Lynch International. He received his undergraduate degree from Brown University and a M.B.A. degree from The Wharton Business School. Ernest R. Bates is the son of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Dr. Ernest A. Bates.

 

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

 

Our Internet address is www.ashs.com . We make available free of charge, through our Internet website under the “Investor Center” tab in the “Corporate” section, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The information contained on our Internet website is not part of this document.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

In addition to the other information in this report, the following factors could affect our future business, results of operations, cash flows or financial position, and could cause future results to differ materially from those expressed in any of the forward-looking statements contained in this report.

 

The Federal Reimbursement Rate for Gamma Knife Treatments Has Been Substantially Reduced

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, enacted by Congress on January 2, 2013 included a provision that reduced Medicare’s reimbursement rate for Gamma Knife services by nearly 60% (from $7,910 to $3,300 per treatment session) beginning April 1, 2013. This reduced the revenues under the Company’s six contracts where payments are based on reimbursement rates to its medical center customers. It also resulted in the revision of contracts at three (3) medical centers with fixed fee contracts to reflect the decreased reimbursement revenues to be received by the hospitals. These changes will adversely affect the Company’s Gamma Knife revenues and overall financial results in the future.

 

13
 

 

The Company’s Capital Investment at Each Site is Substantial

Each radiosurgical or radiation therapy device requires a substantial capital investment. In some cases, we contribute additional funds for capital costs and/or annual operating and equipment related costs such as marketing, maintenance, insurance and property taxes. Due to the structure of our contracts with medical centers, there can be no assurance that these costs will be fully recovered or that we will earn a satisfactory return on our investment.

 

The Market for the Gamma Knife is Limited

There is a limited market for the Gamma Knife, and the market in the United States may be mature. The Company has begun operation at only seven new Gamma Knife sites in the United States since 2004. Due to the substantial costs of acquiring a Gamma Knife unit, we must identify medical centers that possess neurosurgery and radiation oncology departments capable of performing a large number of Gamma Knife procedures. As of December 31, 2013, there were approximately 130 operating Gamma Knife units in the United States, of which 17 units were owned by us. There are more than 300 units in operation worldwide, and the Company owned two operational international units as of December 31, 2013. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in placing additional units at any sites in the future. The Company’s existing contracts with its customers are fixed in length and there can be no assurance that the customers will wish to extend the contract beyond the end of the term.

 

The Company Has a High Level of Debt

The Company’s business is capital intensive. The Company finances an IGRT system through ASHS and its Gamma Knife units and another IGRT system through its GKF subsidiary. The amounts financed through GKF have been generally non-recourse to ASHS. The Company’s combined long term debt and present value of capital leases totals $32,461,000 as of December 31, 2013 and is collateralized by the Gamma Knife and IGRT equipment and other assets, including accounts receivable and future proceeds from any contract between the Company and any end user of the financed equipment. This high level of debt may adversely affect the Company’s ability to secure additional credit in the future, and as a result may affect operations and profitability. If default on debt occurs in the future, the Company’s creditors would have the ability to accelerate the defaulted loan, to seize the Gamma Knife unit or other equipment with respect to which default has occurred, and to apply any collateral they may have at the time to cure the default. The Company also has a line of credit with a bank, against which it has drawn $8,840,000 as of December 31, 2013.

 

A Small Number of Customers Account for a Major Portion of our Revenues

A limited number of customers have historically accounted for a substantial portion of the Company’s total revenue, and the Company expects such customer concentration to continue for the foreseeable future. For example, in 2013, two customers each accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenue, and six customers in total accounted for more than 50% of the Company’s revenue. The loss of a significant customer or a significant decline in the business from the Company’s largest customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.

 

The Market for the Company’s Services is Competitive

The Company estimates that there are three other companies that actively provide alternative, non-conventional Gamma Knife financing to potential customers. We believe there are no competitor companies that currently have more than three Gamma Knife units in operation. The Company’s relationship with Elekta, the manufacturer of the Leksell Gamma Knife unit, is non-exclusive, and in the past the Company has lost sales to customers that chose to purchase a Gamma Knife unit directly from Elekta. In addition, the Company may continue to lose future sales to such customers and may also lose future sales to its competitors. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully compete against others in placing future units.

 

There are Alternatives to the Gamma Knife

Other radiosurgery devices and conventional neurosurgery compete against the Gamma Knife. Each of the medical centers targeted by the Company could decide to acquire another radiosurgery device instead of a Gamma Knife. In addition, neurosurgeons who are primarily responsible for referring patients for Gamma Knife surgery may not be willing to make such referrals for various reasons, instead opting for invasive surgery. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to secure a sufficient number of future sites or Gamma Knife procedures to sustain its profitability and growth.

 

14
 

 

International Operations

The Company has made an effort to expand its operations internationally and has active or projected operations in Turkey and Peru. International operations can be subject to exchange rate volatility which could have an adverse effect on our financial results and cash flows. For instance, the debt for our Turkish operation is denominated in U.S. dollars, but the funds generated to pay the debt are in Turkish lira, so our ability to repay the debt is subject to exchange rate exposure. In addition, international operations can be subject to legal and regulatory uncertainty and political and economic instability, which could result in problems asserting property or contractual rights, potential tariffs, increased compliance costs, increased regulatory scrutiny, potential adverse tax consequences, the inability to repatriate funds to the United States, and the Company’s inability to operate in those locations.

 

New Technology and Products Could Result in Equipment Obsolescence

There is constant change and innovation in the market for highly sophisticated medical equipment. New and improved medical equipment can be introduced that could make the Gamma Knife technology obsolete and that would make it uneconomical to operate. During 2000, Elekta introduced an upgraded Gamma Knife which cost approximately $3.6 million plus applicable tax and duties. This upgrade includes an Automatic Positioning System™ (“APS”), and therefore involves less health care provider intervention. In early 2005, Elekta introduced a new upgrade, the Gamma Knife Model 4C (“Model 4C”). The cost to upgrade existing units to the Model 4C with APS is estimated to be approximately $200,000 to $1,000,000, depending on the current Gamma Knife configuration. In 2006 Elekta introduced a new model of the Gamma Knife, the Perfexion, which costs approximately $4.5 million plus applicable taxes and duties. The Perfexion can perform procedures faster than previous Gamma Knife models and it provides the additional ability to perform procedures on areas of the cervical spine. Existing models of the Gamma Knife are not upgradeable to the Perfexion model. As of March 1, 2014, 14 of the Company’s Gamma Knife units are Perfexion models; of the Company’s remaining Gamma Knife units, three are Model 4C with APS and two are upgradeable to more advanced Model 4C units. The failure to acquire or use new technology and products could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

 

In addition, there are constant advances made in radiation therapy equipment. The Company purchased IGRT and CT Simulator systems in 2006 with a list price of approximately $8,300,000. As in the Gamma Knife business, new and improved IGRT equipment can be introduced that could make the existing technology obsolete and that would make it uneconomical to operate.

 

The Company Has Invested in a Proton Beam Business that is Developmental and Unproven

We have committed a substantial amount of our financial resources to next-generation proton beam technology. The first MEVION S250 system began treating patients in December 2013. We have committed to purchase three Mevion S250 systems, and have already made deposits of $3,000,000 towards this commitment. There can be no assurance that we will recover this investment or future investments, or our $2,701,000 minority investment in Mevion.

 

The Trading Volume of Our Common Stock is Low

Although our common stock is listed on the NYSE Amex Exchange, our common stock has experienced low trading volume, both historically and recently. Reported average daily trading volume in our common stock for the three-month period ended December 31, 2013 was approximately 5,600 shares. There is no reason to think that a more active trading market in our common stock will develop in the future. Limited trading volume subjects our common stock to greater price volatility and may make it difficult for you to sell your shares in a quantity or at a price that is attractive to you.

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

 

15
 

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

 

The Company's corporate offices are located at Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3700, San Francisco, California, where it leases approximately 4,640 square feet for $24,741 per month with a lease expiration date in May 2016. The Company has subleased approximately 3,500 rentable square feet of the office space for $15,458 per month. The sublease expires in May 2016. The Company also has a satellite office in Fairfield, California, where it leases 895 square feet for $2,238 per month with a lease expiration date in April 2014.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company's aggregate net rental expenses for all properties were approximately $549,000.

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

There are no material pending legal proceedings involving the Company or any of its property. The Company knows of no legal or administrative proceedings against the Company contemplated by governmental authorities.

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Not applicable.

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Market Information and Dividend Policy

 

The Company's common shares, no par value (the "Common Shares"), are currently traded on the NYSE Amex Exchange. At December 31, 2013, the Company had 4,608,870 issued and outstanding common shares, 595,580 common shares reserved for options, 3,000 restricted stock units issued and 84,929 restricted stock units reserved for issuance.

 

The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale prices of the Common Shares of the Company on the NYSE Amex Exchange for each full quarter for the last two fiscal years.

 

    Prices for Common Shares  
Quarter Ending   High     Low  
March 31, 2012   $ 3.45     $ 2.55  
June 30, 2012   $ 3.41     $ 2.85  
September 30, 2012   $ 3.22     $ 2.79  
December 31, 2012   $ 2.99     $ 2.35  
March 31, 2013   $ 2.80     $ 1.87  
June 30, 2013   $ 2.31     $ 1.55  
September 30, 2013   $ 3.21     $ 2.14  
December 31, 2013   $ 3.01     $ 2.31  

 

The Company estimates that there were approximately 1,300 beneficial holders of its Common Shares at December 31, 2013.

 

There were no dividends declared or paid during 2013 or 2012. Dividends had been paid by the Company from 2001 to 2007, but during 2007 the Board of Directors suspended dividends for the purpose of preserving cash for the development of its PBRT business. The Company did not pay cash dividends prior to 2001.

 

16
 

 

Stock Repurchase Program

 

In 1999 and 2001, the Board of Directors approved resolutions authorizing the Company to repurchase up to a total of 1,000,000 shares of its own stock on the open market from time to time at prevailing prices, and in 2008 the Board reaffirmed these authorizations. There were no shares repurchased in 2013. In 2012 there were approximately 9,000 shares repurchased at a cost of approximately $28,000. There were no shares repurchased during 2011 or 2010. In 2009 and 2008, the Company repurchased approximately 119,000 and 316,000 shares of its stock, respectively. Prior to 2008, there were no shares repurchased on the open market since the year ended December 31, 2001. A total of approximately 928,000 shares have been repurchased in the open market pursuant to these authorizations at a cost of approximately $1,956,000. As of December 31, 2013 there are approximately 72,000 shares remaining under the repurchase authorizations.

 

Shareholder Rights Plan

 

On March 22, 1999, the Company adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan (“Plan”). Under the Plan, the Company made a dividend distribution of one Right for each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock as of the close of business on April 1, 1999. The Rights become exercisable only if any person or group, with certain exceptions, becomes an “acquiring person” (acquires 15 percent or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock) or announces a tender or exchange offer to acquire 15 percent or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which may prevent a person from acquiring 15% or more of the Company’s common stock without the approval of the Board of Directors. The Company’s Board of Directors adopted the Plan to protect shareholders against a coercive or inadequate takeover offer. On March 12, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the First Amendment to its existing shareholder rights plan which, among other things, extends the final date on which the Rights are exercisable until the close of business on April 1, 2019.

 

Equity Compensation Plans

 

During 2013 no holders of options to acquire the Company’s common stock exercised their respective rights pursuant to such securities; however, 3,000 new shares of common stock were issued to the Company’s Board of Directors and Corporate Secretary from stock grants that vested in 2013. Additional information regarding our equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference from the 2013 Proxy Statement. Also, see Note 9-Shareholders’ Equity to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

17
 

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DAT A

 

Summary of Operations   Year Ended December 31,  
    (Amounts in thousands except per share data)  
    2013     2012     2011     2010     2009  
Revenue   $ 17,584     $ 17,048     $ 22,221     $ 16,675     $ 16,768  
Costs of revenue     10,640       10,118       14,224       9,466       9,781  
Selling and administrative expense     4,025       4,045       4,041       4,240       3,928  
Transaction costs     -       -       -       -       342  
Interest expense     1,799       2,155       2,367       2,104       2,064  
Total expenses     16,464       16,318       20,632       15,810       16,115  
Income from operations     1,120       730       1,589       865       653  
Gain (loss) foreign currency transactions     (1,174 )     132       (27 )     0       0  
Interest and other income     25       58       135       107       60  
Income (loss) before income taxes     (29 )     920       1,697       972       713  
Income tax expense     84       107       208       166       247  
Net income (loss)   $ (113 )   $ 813     $ 1,489     $ 806     $ 466  
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest     (199 )     (775 )     (983 )     (749 )     (654 )
Net income (loss) attributable to ASHS   $ (312 )   $ 38     $ 506     $ 57     $ (188 )
                                         
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to ASHS:                                
Basic   $ (0.07 )   $ 0.01     $ 0.11     $ 0.01     $ (0.04 )
Assuming dilution   $ (0.07 )   $ 0.01     $ 0.11     $ 0.01     $ (0.04 )
See accompanying note (1)                                        
                                         
Balance Sheet Data   As of December 31,  
    (Amounts in thousands)  
    2013     2012     2011     2010     2009  
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 1,909     $ 1,564     $ 2,580     $ 1,438     $ 833  
Certificate of deposit and securities     9,000       9,000       9,000       9,000       9,000  
Restricted cash     50       50       50       50       50  
Working capital (deficit)     (4,079 )     (2,697 )     (1,329 )     (1,369 )     (2,503 )
Total assets     71,742       73,323       74,535       65,340       60,621  
Advances on line of credit     8,840       8,550       7,850       8,500       7,900  
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases     8,771       7,674       7,616       6,073       6,705  
Long-term debt/capital leases, less current portion     23,690       27,010       28,135       23,170       19,069  
Shareholders' equity   $ 24,055     $ 24,830     $ 25,171     $ 23,044     $ 22,755  
See accompanying note (1)                                        

 

(1) In 1995, the Company entered into an operating agreement granting to American Shared Radiosurgery Services (a California corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company) an 81% ownership interest in GKF. During 2010 and 2011, GKF established new operating subsidiaries, EWRS, EWRS Turkey, AGKE, and JGKE, and other subsidiaries that are not yet operational. Accordingly, the financial data for the Company presented above include the results of GKF and its subsidiaries for the periods 2009 through 2013.

 

This financial data as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto beginning on page A-1 of this report and with Item 7–“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

 

18
 

 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and follow general practices within the industry in which it operates. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported.

 

The most significant accounting policies followed by the Company are presented in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. These policies along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes and in this discussion and analysis, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts, and the methods, assumptions and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts, revenue recognition and the carrying value of its Mevion investment to be three areas that required the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available. The following are our critical accounting policies in which management’s estimates, assumptions and judgments most directly and materially affect the financial statements:

 

Revenue Recognition

The Company has one revenue-generating activity, which consists of equipment leasing to hospitals, and includes the operation of Gamma Knife units by GKF and the operation of IGRT sites by ASHS and GKF.

 

Revenue is recognized when services have been rendered and collectability is reasonably assured, on either a fee per use or revenue sharing basis. The Company has contracts with eleven hospitals for fee per use services and ten hospitals for retail services. Under both of these types of agreements, the hospital is responsible for billing patients and collection of fees for services performed. Revenue associated with installation of the Gamma Knife and IGRT units, if any, is a part of the negotiated lease amount and not a distinctly identifiable amount. The costs, if any, associated with installation of the units are amortized over the period of the related lease to match revenue recognition of these costs.

 

For fee per use agreements, revenue is not estimated because these contracts provide for a fixed fee per procedure, and are typically for a ten year term. Revenue is recognized at the time the procedures are performed, based on each hospital’s contracted rate. There is no guaranteed minimum payment. Costs related to operating the units are charged to costs of operations as incurred, which approximates the recognition of the related revenue. Revenue under fee per use agreements is recorded on a gross basis.

 

ASHS has one agreement and GKF has nine agreements that are based on revenue sharing. These can be further classified as either “turn-key” arrangements or “revenue sharing” arrangements. For GKF’s four turn-key sites, GKF is solely responsible for the costs to acquire and install the Gamma Knife. In return, GKF receives payment from the hospital in the amount of its reimbursement from third party payors. Revenue is recognized by the Company during the period in which the procedure is performed, and is estimated based on what can be reasonably expected to be paid by the third party payor to the hospital. The estimate is primarily determined from historical experience and hospital contracts with third party payors. These estimates are reviewed on a regular basis and adjusted as necessary to more accurately reflect the expected payment amount. The Company also records an estimate of operating costs associated with each procedure during the period in which the procedure is performed. Costs are determined primarily based on historical treatment protocols and cost schedules with the hospital. The Company’s estimated operating costs are reviewed on a regular basis and adjusted as necessary to more accurately reflect the actual operating costs. Revenue for turn-key sites is recorded on a gross basis, and the operating expenses the Company reimburses to the hospital are recorded in other operating costs.

 

19
 

 

Under revenue sharing arrangements the hospital shares in the responsibility and risk with the Company for the capital investment to acquire and install the equipment. Unlike our turn-key arrangement, the lease payment under a revenue sharing arrangement is a percentage of revenue. Payments are made by the hospital, generally on a monthly basis, to the Company based on an agreed upon percentage allocation of cash collected. Revenue is recognized during the period in which procedures are performed, and is estimated based on the reimbursement amount that the Company expects to receive from the hospital for those procedures. This estimate is reviewed on a regular basis and adjusted as necessary to more accurately reflect the expected payment amount. Revenue from revenue sharing sites is recorded on a gross basis.

 

Revenue from retail arrangements amounted to approximately 44%, 47% and 28% of total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Because the revenue estimates are reviewed on a quarterly basis, any adjustments required for past revenue estimates would result in an increase or reduction in revenue during the current quarterly period.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on possible losses relating to the Company’s customers. The Company receives reimbursement from the customer based on the customer’s collections from individuals and third-party payors such as insurance companies and Medicare. Receivables are charged against the allowance in the period that they are deemed uncollectible.

 

If the Company’s net accounts receivable estimates for revenue sharing customers as of December 31, 2013 changed by as much as 10% based on actual collection information, it would have the effect of increasing or decreasing revenue by approximately $297,000.

 

Carrying Value of Mevion Investment

The Company carries its investment in Mevion at cost ($2,701,000) and reviews it for impairment on a quarterly basis, or as events or circumstances might indicate that the carrying value of the investment may not be recoverable. In assessing whether the impairment is other than temporary, we evaluate the length of time and extent to which market value has been below cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of Mevion and our ability and intent to retain our investment for a period sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in the market value. Mevion announced on June 11, 2012 that it had received final FDA 510(k) clearance for its Mevion S250 proton therapy system, the world’s first superconducting synchrocyclotron. Clearance allows a hospital to begin treating patients as soon as installation of the system has been completed. Earlier in 2012 Mevion announced that it had received CE Mark certification for its Mevion S250 Proton Therapy System, which allows Mevion to market, sell and install the system throughout the European Union and any country recognizing the CE Mark approval. First clinical treatment by a MEVION S250 system occurred in December 2013. The investment in Mevion is not without certain risk, and the operation of the first unit took longer than originally anticipated. However, the Company believes that the current market value, which we believe to be less than cost, is a temporary situation and is not a reflection on the progress or viability of Mevion or its PBRT design, and believes that our investment in Mevion is only temporarily impaired. If the Company’s view changes, it could be required to write off some or all of its investment, which would have a material negative impact on earnings in the period. For additional information, see “Impairment Analysis of Investment in Equity Securities.”

 

GENERAL

 

Recent Development

 

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 reduces Medicare’s reimbursement rate for Gamma Knife services from $7,910 to $3,300 per treatment effective April 1, 2013. These cuts directly reduced revenue at the Company’s six U.S. “retail” Gamma Knife sites, where we receive a percentage of the hospital’s Medicare reimbursement. This reduction also resulted in the revision of three agreements with fixed fee arrangements. Effective January 1, 2014, the Gamma Knife delivery code reimbursement was increased approximately 9%.

 

20
 

 

2013 Results

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013, 92% of the Company’s revenue was derived from its Gamma Knife business, and the remaining 8% from its IGRT business. For the year ended December 31, 2012, 89% of the Company’s revenue was derived from its Gamma Knife business, and the remaining 11% from its IGRT business. For the year ended December 31, 2011, 95% of the Company’s revenue was derived from its Gamma Knife business, and the remaining 5% from its IGRT business.

 

TOTAL REVENUE

 

(in thousands)   2013     Increase
(Decrease)
    2012     Increase
(Decrease)
    2011  
Total revenue   $ 17,584       3.1 %   $ 17,048       (23.3 )%   $ 22,221  

 

Total revenue increased by 3.1% compared to 2012 primarily due to an increase in Gamma Knife revenue. Total Gamma Knife revenue increased 6.4% from 2012, offset by a 23.1% decrease in IGRT revenue. Total revenue decreased by 23.3% in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to equipment sales revenue of $4,984,000 in 2011, where there was no equipment sales revenue in 2012. In addition a 5.6% decrease in Gamma Knife revenue in 2012 compared to 2011 was partially offset by a 65.6% increase in IGRT revenue.

 

Gamma Knife Revenue

Total Gamma Knife revenue for 2013 increased 6.4% to $16,127,000 compared to $15,154,000 in 2012. Total Gamma Knife revenue for 2012 decreased 28.1% to $15,154,000 compared to $21,077,000 in 2011. The revenue for 2011 includes $4,984,000 of equipment sales revenue, which was generated by the sale of a new Perfexion unit to an existing Gamma Knife customer in conjunction with the early termination of the customer lease. Revenue from this equipment sale is not considered medical services revenue, and is not included in the table below.

 

    2013    

Increase

(Decrease)

    2012    

Increase

(Decrease)

    2011  
Medical services revenue from Gamma Knife (in thousands)   $ 16,127       6.4 %   $ 15,154       (5.8 )%   $ 16,093  
Number of Gamma Knife procedures     2,482       18.6 %     2,092       7.1 %     1,954  
Average revenue per procedure   $ 6,498       (10.3 )%   $ 7,244       (12.0 )%   $ 8,236  

 

The increase in revenue in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to the increase in number of Gamma Knife procedures, offset by a decrease in the average revenue per procedure. The decrease in revenue in 2012 compared to 2011 was primarily due to the loss of revenue in 2012 from a site where the contract ended in the third quarter 2011. In addition, revenue declined at several sites, partially offset by increases in revenue at other sites including sites that started operation during 2011 and one new site that began operation in the second quarter 2012. The Company had nineteen Gamma Knife units in operation at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

 

The number of Gamma Knife procedures performed in 2013 increased by 390 compared to 2012, primarily due to an increase in procedures at existing sites and procedures at a new site, which began operations in April 2013. Furthermore, 2013 was the first full year of operations for the two sites in Turkey. This increase was partially offset by lower procedure volumes at several other sites. The number of Gamma Knife procedures performed in 2012 increased by 138 compared to 2011, primarily due to an increase in the number of procedures performed at sites that began operation in 2011 and a new site that began operation in the second quarter 2012. This was partially offset by lower procedure volumes at several other sites.

 

21
 

 

Revenue per procedure decreased by $746 in 2013 and by $992 in 2012 compared to the prior years, respectively. For 2013, this decrease is primarily due to the impact of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 that became effective April 1, 2013, and increased activity at sites with lower revenue per procedure than the Company’s historical average. For 2012, this is primarily due to an increase in procedures at two sites that began operation in 2011 and 2012 where the contracted revenue per procedure is lower than the Company’s historical average, and a decrease in revenue per procedure at one of the Company’s existing retail sites. The Company’s contracts generally have different procedure rates because their investment basis varies, so revenue per procedure can vary year to year depending primarily on the mix of procedures performed at certain locations.

 

IGRT Revenue

 

(In thousands)   2013    

Increase

(Decrease)

    2012    

Increase

(Decrease)

    2011  
Medical services revenue from IGRT   $ 1,457       (23.1 )%   $ 1,894       65.6 %   $ 1,144  

 

Medical services revenue from the Company’s IGRT contracts decreased by $437,000 in 2013 compared to 2012. The decrease in 2013 was due to lower volume at the Company’s existing sites. Medical services revenue from the Company’s IGRT contracts increased $750,000 in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase in 2012 was due to revenue generated for the entire year from a new site that began operation during the fourth quarter 2011, and higher revenue at the Company’s previously existing site.

 

COSTS OF REVENUE

 

(In thousands)   2013    

Increase

(Decrease)

    2012    

Increase

(Decrease)

    2011  
Total costs of revenue   $ 10,640       5.2 %   $ 10,118       (28.9 )%   $ 14,224  
Percentage of total revenue     60.5 %             59.4 %             64.0 %

 

The Company's costs of revenue, consisting of cost of equipment sales, maintenance and supplies, depreciation and amortization, and other operating expenses (such as insurance, property taxes, sales taxes, marketing costs and operating costs from the Company’s retail sites) increased by $522,000 in 2013 compared to 2012 and decreased by $4,106,000 in 2012 compared to 2011.

 

Costs of operations in 2011 included $4,146,000 in cost of equipment sales, compared to no cost of equipment sales in 2013 and 2012. Cost of equipment sales is specific to equipment sales revenue, and represents approximately 19% of total revenue in 2011.

 

The Company's maintenance and supplies costs were 10.2% of total revenue in 2013, 9.0% of total revenue in 2012 and 7.0% of total revenue in 2011. Maintenance and supplies costs increased by $262,000 in 2013 compared to 2012 and $45,000 in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase in 2013 compared to 2012 is primarily due to several of the Company’s sites that had been upgraded to Perfexion units in 2013, which have higher maintenance costs. In addition, the units in Turkey had maintenance contracts which began in May 2013. The increase in 2012 compared to 2011 is primarily due to an increase in costs of maintenance not covered under maintenance contracts. This was partially offset by lower contract maintenance costs due to warranty periods continuing into a portion of 2012 for Perfexion units that started during 2011.

 

Depreciation and amortization costs as a percentage of total revenue were 35.9%, 35.0%, and 28.0% in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Depreciation and amortization costs increased $344,000 in 2013 compared to 2012 and decreased $162,000 in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase in 2013 compared to 2012 is due to the addition of one new Perfexion unit, plus two existing sites that were reloaded with new cobalt and one site that was upgraded to a Perfexion unit, therefore increasing the value of the unit and depreciation expense for those sites. The decrease in 2012 compared to 2011 is primarily because depreciation was adjusted for salvage value on three Gamma Knife units, the life was adjusted on three other Gamma Knife units because of customer contract extensions, and ended on two Gamma Knife units where the remaining value of the equipment had reached salvage value.

 

22
 

 

Other direct operating costs as a percentage of total revenue were 14.4%, 15.4% and 11.0% in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Other direct operating costs decreased by $84,000 in 2013 compared to 2012 and increased by $157,000 in 2012 compared to 2011. The decrease in 2013 is due to decreased costs from the Company’s turn-key sites, as a result of lower volumes at some of the turn-key sites. This decrease was offset by increases in building rent, marketing, insurance, property taxes and state or county licenses fees. The increase in 2012 is primarily due to increased costs from the Company’s turn-key sites, since there was a full year of operation for two of the Company’s new sites that began operation in 2011 that were turn-key.

 

SELLING AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE

 

(In thousands)   2013     Increase
(Decrease)
    2012     Increase
(Decrease)
    2011  
Selling and administrative costs   $ 4,025       (0.5 )%   $ 4,045       0.1 %   $ 4,041  
Percentage of total revenue     22.9 %             23.7 %             18.2 %

 

The Company's selling and administrative costs decreased by $20,000 in 2013 compared to 2012 and $4,000 in 2012 compared to 2011. The decrease in 2013 is due to lower travel expense of $168,000, offset by increases in temporary help for the Turkey sites of $80,000 and building rent of $68,000. Building rent increased due to accrued rent expense and commissions relating to a sublease of a portion of the Company’s office space, recorded in the first quarter of 2013. The increase in 2012 compared to 2011 was primarily due to increased travel and other business development costs of $44,000, board of director fees of $36,000, investor relations costs of approximately $33,000, recruiting fees of $30,000 and state and county taxes and fees of $28,000. These increases were partially offset by lower payroll related costs of $145,000 and lower depreciation expense.

 

INTEREST EXPENSE

 

(In thousands)   2013     Increase
(Decrease)
    2012     Increase
(Decrease)
    2011  
Interest expense   $ 1,799       (16.5 )%   $ 2,155       (9.0 )%   $ 2,367  
Percentage of total revenue     10.2 %             12.6 %             10.7 %

 

The Company's interest expense decreased $356,000 in 2013 compared to 2012 and decreased $212,000 in 2012 compared to 2011. The decrease in 2013 compared to 2012 and 2012 compared to 2011 is due to lower interest expense on the financing for the Company’s more mature Gamma Knife units. Interest expense on financing decreases over time as payments reduce the principal amount outstanding. In addition, one of the Company’s contracts was paid off in 2013, reducing interest expense.

 

GAIN (LOSS) FOREIGN CURRENT TRANSACTIONS

 

(In thousands)   2013     Increase
(Decrease)
    2012     Increase
(Decrease)
    2011  
Gain (loss) foreign transactions   ($ 1,174 )     (989.4 )%   $ 132       588.9 %   $ (27 )
Percentage of total revenue     (6.7 )%             0.8 %             0.1 %

 

Gain (loss) from foreign currency transactions decreased $1,306,000 in 2013 compared to 2012 and increased by $159,000 in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase or decrease in gain (loss) from foreign currency transactions is due to the strengthening or weakening of the Turkish Lira against the US dollar.

 

23
 

 

INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME

 

(In thousands)   2013     Increase
(Decrease)
    2012     Increase
(Decrease)
    2011  
Interest and other income   $ 25       (56.9 )%   $ 58       (57.0 )%   $ 135  
Percentage of total revenue     0.1 %             0.3 %             0.6 %

 

Interest and other income decreased $33,000 in 2013 compared to 2012 and decreased by $77,000 in 2012 compared to 2011. The decrease in 2013 was due to lower interest income of $15,000 and a loss on sales of assets of $4,000, compared to a gain of $14,000 in 2012. The decrease in 2012 was due to lower interest income of $20,000 and lower gain on sale of assets of $59,000.

 

INCOME TAX EXPENSE

 

(In thousands)   2013     Increase
(Decrease)
    2012     Increase
(Decrease)
    2011  
Income tax expense   $ 84       (21.5 )%   $ 107       (48.6 )%   $ 208  
Percentage of total revenue     0.5 %             0.6 %             0.9 %
Percentage of income before income taxes     (289.7 )%             11.6 %             12.3 %

 

Income tax expense decreased $23,000 in 2013 compared to 2012 and decreased $101,000 in 2012 compared to 2011. The decrease in 2013 and 2012 is primarily due to lower computed expected federal income tax calculated on lower income before income taxes, compared to 2012 and 2011, respectively. Generally the Company has higher state income taxes because they are calculated at the Company’s profitable operating subsidiary level, where in many states, separate state income tax returns are required and net operating loss carryforwards cannot be applied.

 

The Company anticipates that it will continue to record income tax expense if it operates profitably in the future. Currently there are state income tax payments required for most states in which the Company operates. However there are minimal current federal income tax payments required due to net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets available for tax purposes.

 

The Company had a net operating loss carryforward for federal income tax return purposes at December 31, 2013 of approximately $9,609,000.

 

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

(In thousands)   2013     Increase
(Decrease)
    2012     Increase
(Decrease)
    2011  
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests   $ 199       (74.3 )%   $ 775       (21.2 )%   $ 983  
Percentage of total revenue     1.1 %             4.5 %             4.4 %

 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests decreased $576,000 in 2013 compared to 2012 and decreased $208,000 in 2012 compared to 2011. Net income attributable to non-controlling interests represents the pre-tax income earned by the 19% non-controlling interest in GKF, and the pre-tax income or losses of the non-controlling interests in various subsidiaries controlled by GKF. The decrease or increase in net income attributable to non-controlling interests reflects the relative profitability of GKF.

 

24
 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES

 

(In thousands,
except per share amounts)
  2013     Increase
(Decrease)
    2012     Increase
(Decrease)
    2011  
Net income (loss) attributable to ASHS   $ (312 )     (921.1 )%   $ 38       (92.5 )%   $ 506  
Net income (loss) per share attributable to ASHS, diluted   $ (0.07 )     (800.0 )%   $ 0.01       (90.9 )%   $ 0.11  

 

 

Net loss attributable to American Shared Hospital Services was $312,000 in 2013, compared to net income of $38,000 in 2012 and $506,000 in 2011. The $350,000 decrease in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to the foreign currency losses incurred of $1,174,000 compared to a foreign currency gain of $132,000 in 2012. The $468,000 decrease in 2012 compared to 2011 was primarily because there were no equipment sales in 2012 compared to a net gain on equipment sales in 2011 of $838,000. Lower interest expense of $212,000, an increase in interest and other income of $82,000, lower income tax expense of $101,000, and lower net income attributable to non-controlling interests of $208,000 partially offset the decrease.

 

IMPAIRMENT ANALYSIS OF INVESTMENT IN EQUITY SECURITIES

 

The Company evaluated its investment in Mevion for impairment at December 31, 2013 in light of both current market conditions and the ongoing needs of Mevion to raise cash to continue its development of the first compact, single room PBRT system, including the following specific events.

 

Beginning in October 2008 Mevion offered a sequence of Series D rounds of funding to raise cash for its next phase of development and continued manufacture of the prototype model of the proton beam unit. Due to the troubled economy and scarcity of funds available during this time, these rounds were offered at a per share price less than the Company’s investment. Mevion received approximately $65 million from these Series D rounds from new and existing investors.

 

In January 2012, Mevion announced that it had closed a $45 million round of Series E financing which is to be used to accelerate the manufacturing and worldwide deployment of the Mevion S250. A new investor was the largest investor in this round, which also included existing investors. This round of financing was offered at a per share price higher than the effective price of the last round of Series D financing, and initially funded at 55%, with the remaining 45% funded in June 2012, upon Mevion’s receipt of final FDA 510(k) clearance. The Company invested an additional $70,000 in this round.

 

The lower price per share of the Series D and Series E offerings and the price per common share compared to the Company’s original investment could be viewed as a reasonable estimate of the fair value of our cost-method investment, indicating that our investment is impaired. The Company estimates that there is currently an unrealized loss (impairment) of approximately $2.4 million based on the issuance of the Series B, C and E funding compared to the Company’s cost of its investment.

 

In assessing whether the impairment is other than temporary, we evaluated the length of time and extent to which market value has been below cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of Mevion and our ability and intent to retain our investment for a period sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in the market value. Although the investment is not without risk, and the manufacture of the first unit has taken longer than originally anticipated, the Company believes that the current market value is a temporary situation and the successful clinical operation of the first MEVION S250 system at Barnes Jewish Hospital and Mevion’s significant revenue backlog provide a significantly higher potential valuation.

 

25
 

 

This is based primarily on the following:

 

· In April 2013, Mevion raised an additional $25M through the sale of Series E preferred stock to existing investors. Mevion also secured $30M in mezzanine financing. Mevion’s ability to raise significant funds indicates the investment is only temporarily impaired.
· As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s investment in Mevion was reduced to 0.77% and converted from preferred stock to common stock. Management of the Company believes that the clinical operation of a Mevion system is a pivotal point in determining whether the Company’s investment is other than temporarily impaired. The company estimates that its ownership interest in Mevion is still great enough to result in a return higher than its cost basis in the future.
· In June 2012 Mevion announced that it had received FDA 510(k) clearance for its Mevion S250 proton therapy system which includes the world's first superconducting synchrocyclotron. FDA clearance allows a hospital to begin treating patients as soon as installation of the system has been completed. In March 2012 Mevion announced that it had secured CE certification throughout the European Union.
· Mevion’s first proton beam therapy unit at Barnes Jewish Hospital is complete. The first treatment at Barnes Jewish Hospital was performed in mid-December 2013.
· Mevion is continuing the installation process at five other sites, including the Company’s site at University of Florida Cancer Center at Orlando Health (formerly the MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando). The Company’s first site broke ground for construction in September 2012 and the accelerator is expected to be delivered in August 2014.
· In spite of the uncertain economic climate and a limited number of potential investors, with the initial Series D offering Mevion was still able to raise the cash required to continue its operations, was able to add two new major investors, and continued to be able to raise additional cash with Series D extensions and the new Series E offering. It also added an additional major investor in the Series E offering with ProQuest Investments. Due to the high level of interest in more compact and lower cost proton beam radiation therapy devices, Mevion has been able to attract funding from financially significant and highly sophisticated investors, such as Caxton Health and Life Sciences, Venrock Associates and CHL Medical Partners, who have continued to invest in the various rounds of financing, and the new investor, ProQuest Investments.
· The Company has analyzed its investment potential by comparing available financial information from Mevion to financial data from initial public offerings (“IPO”) of companies with similar technologies and has determined that it could reasonably expect that the value of its investment in Mevion would exceed the cost of its investment.

 

In addition the Company considered the following:

 

· Much of Mevion’s unique design is based on existing technology:
o The single room PBRT concept and design, although a departure from the large scale three and four room PBRT systems on the market, is based on the existing principle of generating protons from a cyclotron. Mevion, through design innovations and advances in magnet technology, has made the cyclotron more compact such that it can be mounted on the gantry.
o A gantry mounted cyclotron, although appearing to be revolutionary, has in fact been done previously. A neutron generating gantry mounted cyclotron has successfully treated patients for over ten years at Detroit Medical Center.
o Mevion’s development approach for the Mevion S250 has been to integrate as many commercially existing components as possible into the Mevion S250. The patient couch, CT imaging and treatment planning software are all commercially available and will be integrated into the Mevion S250.
o Mevion has hired engineers and staff with many years of accelerator and proton beam experience. Personnel have been hired with prior experience at MIT’s Plasma Fusion Lab, as well as Mevion rival, Ion Beam Applications S.A. (IBA).
· There were some minor problems during some of the initial tests that were rectified, but have caused delays in the scheduled delivery of the first unit. As a result, the Company’s expected delivery of its first two units has also been delayed. However, problems such as these are expected in a new technology, and do not affect the Company’s position on the viability of Mevion technology.

 

26
 

 

· A respected physicist was hired by the Company as a third party consultant to perform a technical review of this project, and continues to make periodic reviews at the request of the Company. The consultant was not engaged to analyze Mevion’s financial condition.
· In the latter part of 2009 Mevion added a new CEO, strengthened its management depth, and with the new investors, increased its board strength as well. Independent board members consist of the following: Robert Wilson, Former Vice Chairman of Johnson and Johnson; Peter P. D’Angelo, President, Caxton Associates; Anders Hove, MD, Partner, Venrock Associates; Myles D. Greenberg, MD, General Partner, CHL Medical Partners; Jay Rao, MD, JD, Portfolio Manager, Green Arrow Capital Management; and Paul Volcker, Former Chairman, United States Federal Reserve. Jay Moorin of ProQuest Investments was added to Mevion’s Board of Directors in January 2012.
· Mevion added four orders during 2012 to its sites agreeing to install the Mevion S250 system, and now has 21 total sites committed to installing the Mevion S250, with 14 in the United States.

 

The estimated recovery period is anticipated to occur subsequent to the first system’s clinical treatment of patients. The first system began treating patients in December 2013. The Company has the intent and ability to maintain its investment in Mevion.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $1,909,000 at December 31, 2013 compared to $1,564,000 at December 31, 2012, an increase of $345,000. The Company’s expected primary cash needs on both a short and long-term basis are for capital expenditures, business expansion, working capital and other general corporate purposes.

 

At both December 31, 2013 and 2012 the Company had approximately $9,000,000 invested in a certificate of deposit with a bank. The certificate of deposit the Company holds as of December 31, 2013 matures on August 30, 2014.

 

Restricted cash of $50,000 at December 31, 2013 reflects cash that may only be used for the operations of GKF.

 

The Company has a $9,000,000 renewable line of credit with a bank that is secured by a certificate of deposit. The line of credit has been in place since June 2004 and has a maturity date of August 1, 2015. As of December 31, 2013, there was $8,840,000 borrowed against the line of credit, compared to $8,550,000 as of December 31, 2012. The Company believes it has the ability, and it is the Company’s intention, to renew the line of credit at its maturity in 2015.

 

Operating activities provided cash of $8,076,000 in 2013, which was driven by non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization of $6,410,000, loss on disposal of fixed assets of $20,000, stock-based compensation expense of $88,000, deferred income tax of $59,000, loss on foreign currency transactions of $1,174,000, increase in accounts payable of $1,023,000 and other assets of $58,000. These were partially offset by net loss of $113,000 and changes in receivables of $643,000. The Company’s trade accounts receivable increased by $816,000 to $4,522,000 at December 31, 2013 from $3,706,000 at December 31, 2012, primarily due to increased procedures at existing sites and slower cash collections on a few customer accounts. The number of days revenue (sales) outstanding (“DSO”) in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2013 increased to 109 days compared to 83 days at December 31, 2012. DSO can and does fluctuate depending on timing of customer payments received and the mix of fee per use versus retail customers. Retail sites generally have longer collection periods than fee per use sites.

 

Investing activities used $1,724,000 of cash in 2013 due to payments made towards the purchase of property and equipment of $1,710,000 and investment in equity securities of $14,000.

 

Financing activities used $6,019,000 of cash during 2013, primarily due to principal payments on long-term debt of $3,523,000, principal payments towards capital leases of $3,476,000, distributions to non-controlling interests of $792,000, and payments on the line of credit of $79,000. This was partially offset by long term debt financing on property and equipment of $1,298,000, advances on the line of credit of $369,000, and capital contributions from non-controlling interests in subsidiaries of the Company of $184,000.

 

27
 

 

The Company had negative working capital at December 31, 2013 of $4,079,000 compared to negative working capital of $2,697,000 at December 31, 2012. This $1,382,000 decrease was due to net increases in the current portion of long term debt and capital leases of $1,097,000, increase in accounts payable of $309,000, increases in other accrued liabilities of $690,000, employee compensation and benefits of $36,000, and decreases in prepaid expenses of $185,000. This was offset by increases in cash of $345,000, receivables of $558,000 and current deferred tax assets of $32,000.

 

The Company primarily invests its cash in certificates of deposit, money market or similar funds, and high quality short to long-term securities in order to minimize the potential for principal erosion. Cash is invested in these funds pending use in the Company’s operations. The Company believes its cash position is adequate to service the Company’s cash requirements in 2014.

 

The Company initially finances all of its Gamma Knife and radiation therapy units and anticipates that it will continue to do so with future contracts. The Company has secured financing for its projects from several lenders and anticipates that it will be able to secure financing on future projects from these or other lending sources, but there can be no assurance that financing will continue to be available on acceptable terms. The Company meets all debt covenants required under notes with its lenders, and expects that any covenants required by future lenders will be acceptable to the Company.

 

IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES

 

The Company does not believe that inflation has had a significant impact on operations because a substantial majority of the costs that it incurs under its customer contracts are fixed through the term of the contract.

 

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

The following table presents, as of December 31, 2013, the Company’s significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations by payment date. The payment amounts represent those amounts contractually due to the recipient and do not include any unamortized premiums or discounts, hedge basis adjustments, or other similar carrying value adjustments. Further discussion of the nature of each obligation is included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements referenced below.

 

    Payments Due by Period  
Contractual Obligations   Total amounts
committed
    Less than
1 year
    1-3 years     4-5 years     After
5 years
 
                               
Long-term debt (includes interest)   $ 16,989,000     $ 5,421,000     $ 7,806,000     $ 3,269,000     $ 493,000  
Capital leases (includes interest)     19,897,000     $ 5,140,000     $ 8,899,000     $ 5,043,000     $ 815,000  
Line of credit     8,840,000       -       8,840,000       -       -  
Future equipment purchases (1)     50,309,000       3,498,000       46,811,000       -       -  
Operating leases     735,000       304,000       431,000       -       -  
                                         
Total contractual obligationsq   $ 96,770,000     $ 14,363,000     $ 72,787,000     $ 8,312,000     $ 1,308,000  

 

(1) The Company has made cash deposits totaling $5,884,000 toward these equipment purchase commitments. The commitments include the purchase of three Gamma Knife Perfexion units, one Model 4C unit, and three Mevion S250 proton beam units as of December 31, 2013. Two of the Perfexion units are committed to being installed at a new site in 2014 and the other site has yet to be determined. Financing has been committed to the Model 4C unit and the Perfexion unit scheduled for installation in August 2014. Financing has not yet been obtained for the other equipment. For all equipment in this classification, term financing for these purchases will not be finalized until 2014 or later, and therefore an accurate determination of payments by period cannot be made as of December 31, 2013. For purposes of this table, these commitments are listed in the 1 year and 1-3 year categories.

 

28
 

 

Further discussion of the long-term debt commitment is included in Note 5, capital leases in Note 6, and operating leases in Note 12 of the consolidated financial statements.

 

The Company has no significant off-balance sheet arrangements.

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

The table below presents information about certain market-sensitive financial instruments as of December 31, 2013. The fair values were determined based on quoted market prices for the same or similar instruments.

 

    Payments Due by Period                    
(amounts in thousands)   2014     2015     2016     2017     2018     There-
after
    Total     Fair
Value
 
                                                 
Fixed rate long-term debt and present value of capital leases   $ 8,771     $ 7,498     $ 7,185     $ 5,064     $ 2,684     $ 1,259     $ 32,461     $ 32,418  
                                                                 
Average interest rates     5.4 %     6.0 %     6.0 %     5.9 %     5.5 %     5.2 %     5.7 %        

 

We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes and are not a party to any instruments with leverage or prepayment features.

 

At December 31, 2013, we had no significant long-term, market-sensitive investments.

 

We have no affiliation with partnerships, trusts or other entities whose purpose is to facilitate off-balance sheet financial transactions or similar arrangements, and therefore have no exposure to the financing, liquidity, market or credit risks associated with such entities.

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

See the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules included at page A-1 of this report.

 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

None.

 

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

 

Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures required by paragraph (b) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15.

 

(b) Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting.

 

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to its management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

 

29
 

 

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

 

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992). Based on this assessment management believes that, as of December 31, 2013, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

 

(c) Changes in internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the changes to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2013, as required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, and have concluded that there were no such changes that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Information regarding directors is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2014 Proxy Statement”). Information regarding executive officers of the Company, included herein under the caption “Executive Officers of the Company” in Part I, Item 1 above, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Information concerning the identification of our standing audit committee required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the 2014 Proxy Statement.

 

Information concerning our audit committee financial experts required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the 2014 Proxy Statement.

 

Information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the 2014 Proxy Statement.

 

We have adopted a Code of Ethics that is available on our website at www.ashs.com . The information on our website is not part of this report. You may also request a copy of this document free of charge by writing our Corporate Secretary.

 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the 2014 Proxy Statement.

 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

Information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the 2014 Proxy Statement.

 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

Information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the 2014 Proxy Statement.

 

30
 

 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

 

Information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the 2014 Proxy Statement.

 

 

PART IV

 

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

(a) Financial Statements and Schedules.

The following Financial Statements and Schedules are filed with this Report:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Financial Statement Schedules- no schedules are included since the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the financial statements and notes thereto.

 

(b) Exhibits.

The following Exhibits are filed with this Report.

 

Exhibit

Number: Description:

 

2.1 Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 12, 1999, by and among Alliance Imaging, Inc.; Embarcadero Holding Corp. I; Embarcadero Holding Corp. II; American Shared Hospital Services; and MMRI, Inc. (1)

 

3.1 Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended. (2)

 

3.2 By-laws of the Company, as amended. (3)

 

4.6 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant of American Shared Hospital Services. (3)

 

4.8 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 17, 1995, by and among American Shared Hospital Services, the Holders referred to in the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 12, 1995 and General Electric Company, acting through GE Medical Systems. (3)

 

4.9 Rights Agreement dated as of March 22, 1999 between American Shared Hospital Services and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company as Rights Agent. (25)

 

10.1 The Company's 1984 Stock Option Plan, as amended. (4)

 

10.2 The Company's 1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended. (5)

 

10.3 Form of Indemnification Agreement between American Shared Hospital Services and members of its Board of Directors. (4)

 

10.4 Ernest A. Bates Stock Option Agreement dated as of August 15, 1995. (6)

 

10.5 Operating Agreement for GK Financing, LLC, dated as of October 17, 1995. (3)

 

31
 

 

10.6 Amendments dated as of October 26, 1995 and as of December 20, 1995 to the GK Financing, LLC Operating Agreement, dated as of October 17, 1995. (7)

 

10.7 Amendment dated as of October 16, 1996 to the GK Financing, LLC Operating Agreement, dated as of October 17, 1995. (1)

 

10.8 Amendment dated as of March 31, 1998 (“Fourth Amendment”) to the GK Financing, LLC Operating Agreement dated as of October 17, 1995. (8)

 

10.9 Amendment dated as of March 31, 1998 (“Fifth Amendment”) to the GK Financing, LLC Operating Agreement dated as of October 17, 1995. (8)

 

10.10 Amendment dated as of June 5, 1999 to the GK Financing, LLC Operating Agreement dated as of October 17, 1995. (8)

 

10.11a Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of December 31, 1995, between American Shared Radiosurgery Services (assignor) and GK Financing, LLC (assignee). (8)

 

10.11b Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1995, between American Shared Hospital Services (assignor) and American Shared Radiosurgery Services (assignee). (4)

 

10.11c Amendment Number One dated as of August 1, 1995 to the Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit between The Regents of the University of California and American Shared Hospital Services. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8)

 

10.11d Lease Agreement dated as of July 3, 1990 for a Gamma Knife Unit between American Shared Hospital Services and The Regents of the University of California. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8)

 

10.12 Amendment Number Two dated as of February 6, 1999 to the Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit between UCSF-Stanford Health Care and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8)

 

10.13 Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of February 3, 1996, between American Shared Radiosurgery Services (assignor) and GK Financing, LLC (assignee). (4)

 

10.14 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of April 6, 1994, between Ernest A. Bates, M.D. and NME Hospitals, Inc. dba USC University Hospital. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8)

 

10.15 Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated as of February 1, 1996 between Ernest A. Bates, M.D. and GK Financing, LLC with respect to the Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife dated as of April 6, 1994 between Ernest A. Bates, M.D. and NME Hospitals, Inc. dba USC University Hospital. (8)

 

10.16 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of October 31, 1996 between Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8)

 

10.17 Addendum to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of December 1, 1999 between Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8)

 

32
 

 

10.18 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of October 29, 1996 between Methodist Healthcare Systems of San Antonio, Ltd., dba Southwest Texas Methodist Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8)

 

10.18a Amendment to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective December 13, 2003 by and between Methodist Healthcare Systems of San Antonio, Ltd., dba Southwest Texas Methodist Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (22 )

 

10.18b Second Amendment to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective December 23, 2009 by and between Methodist Healthcare Systems of San Antonio, Ltd., dba Southwest Texas Methodist Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (38 )

 

10.19 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of April 10, 1997 between Yale-New Haven Ambulatory Services Corporation and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8)

 

10.19a Amendment to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective October 25, 2005 by and between Yale-New Haven Ambulatory Services Corporation and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (27)

 

10.19b Amendment to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective June 30, 2006 by and between Yale-New Haven Ambulatory Services Corporation and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (31)

 

10.19c Second Amendment to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective May 15, 2009 by and between Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc. a/k/a Yale-New Haven Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (37)

 

10.20 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of June 1, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and Kettering Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (9)

 

10.21 Addendum to Contract with GKF and KMC/WKNI, dated June 1, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and Kettering Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (9)

 

33
 

 

10.21a Purchased Services Agreement for a Gamma Knife Perfexion Unit dated November 19, 2008 between GK Financing, LLC and Kettering Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (34)

 

10.21b First Amendment to Purchased Services Agreement for a Gamma Knife Perfexion Unit dated June 11, 2009 between GK Financing, LLC and Kettering Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (34)

 

10.22 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of October 5, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and New England Medical Center Hospitals, Inc. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (9)

 

10.22a Addendum to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife unit effective April 1, 2005 between GK Financing, LLC and New England Medical Center Hospitals, Inc. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (24)

 

10.22b Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit (Perfexion Upgrade) effective July 30, 2013 between GK Financing, LLC and Tufts Medical Center, Inc. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (48)

 

10.23 Equipment Lease Agreement dated as of October 29, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas on behalf of The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (9)

 

10.23a Amendment to Lease Agreement effective as of September 15, 2005 between GK Financing, LLC and the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas on behalf of The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (26)

 

10.23b Amendment to Lease Agreement effective as of October 31, 2007 between GK Financing, LLC and the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas on behalf of The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. (32)

 

10.23c Amendment Three to Lease Agreement effective as of June 11, 2010 between GK Financing, LLC and the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas on behalf of The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. (36)

 

10.24 First Amendment to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective as of August 2, 2000 between GK Financing, LLC and Tenet HealthSystems Hospitals, Inc. (formerly known as NME Hospitals, Inc.) dba USC University Hospital. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (9)

 

10.25 Addendum Two, dated as of October 1, 2000, to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of October 31, 1996 between Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (10)

 

34
 

 

10.26 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of May 28, 2000 between Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (10)

 

10.26a First Amendment to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of December 28, 2009 between Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (35)

 

10.26b Second Amendment to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of May 16, 2013 between GK Financing, LLC and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Inc. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (46)

 

10.27 Addendum dated June 24, 2000 to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of May 28, 2000 between Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (10)

 

10.28 Amendment dated July 12, 2000 to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated May 28, 2000 between Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (10)

 

10.29 Amendment dated August 24, 2000 to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated May 28, 2000 between Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (10)

 

10.30 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of December 11, 1996 between The Community Hospital Group, Inc. dba JFK Medical Center and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (11)

 

10.30a Addendum One to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated January 9, 2008 between GK Financing, LLC and The Community Hospital Group, Inc. dba JFK Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks). (33)

 

10.30b Addendum Two to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated January 9, 2008 between GK Financing, LLC and The Community Hospital Group, Inc. dba JFK Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks). (33)

 

10.31 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of June 3, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, LLC dba Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (12)

 

10.32 Addendum to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of June 3, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, LLC dba Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (12)

 

35
 

 

10.33 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of November 1, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and Jackson HMA, Inc. dba Central Mississippi Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (13)

 

10.34 Addendum to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of November 1, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and Jackson HMA, Inc. dba Central Mississippi Medical Center. (13)

 

10.35 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of February 18, 2000 between GK Financing, LLC and OSF HealthCare System. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (13)

 

10.35a Addendum to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective April 13, 2007, between GK Financing, LLC and OSF HealthCare System. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (30)

 

10.35b Addendum Two to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective October 31, 2012 between GK Financing, LLC and OSF Healthcare System. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (46)

 

10.36 American Shared Hospital Services 2001 Stock Option Plan. (14)

 

10.37 Amendment Number Three to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of June 22, 2001 between GK Financing, LLC and The Regents of the University of California. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (15)

 

10.38 Addendum Three to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of October 1, 2000 between GK Financing, LLC and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presybterian. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (15)

 

10.39 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of July 18, 2001 between GK Financing, LLC and Bayfront Medical Center, Inc.. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (16)

 

10.40 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of September 13, 2001 between GK Financing, LLC and Mercy Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (17)

 

10.41 Addendum Number One to Contract dated September 13, 2001 between GK Financing, LLC and Mercy Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (17)

 

36
 

 

10.42 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of May 22, 2002 between GK Financing, LLC and The Johns Hopkins Hospital. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (18)

 

10.43 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of July 11, 2002 between GK Financing, LLC and Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc. D/B/A Baptist Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (19)

 

10.43a First Amendment to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of June 30, 2011 between GK Financing, LLC and Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc. (40)

 

10.44 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of February 13, 2003 between GK Financing, LLC and AHS Albuquerque Regional Medical Center LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (20)

 

10.45 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of May 28, 2003 between GK Financing, LLC and Lehigh Valley Hospital. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (21)

 

10.45a First Amendment to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated November 2006 between GK Financing, LLC and Lehigh Valley Hospital. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (28)

 

10.45b Second Amendment to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated effective as of March 2, 2011 between GK Financing, LLC and Lehigh Valley Hospital. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks). (42)

 

10.45c Third Amendment to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated effective as of March 2, 2011 between GK Financing, LLC and Lehigh Valley Hospital. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks). (42)

 

10.46 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of March 21, 2003 between GK Financing, LLC and Northern Westchester Hospital Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (23)

 

10.46a Amendment to Equipment Lease Agreement (Perfexion Upgrade) effective as of June 8, 2012 between GK Financing, LLC and Northern Westchester Hospital Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (46)

 

10.47 Amendment Four to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective as of December 1, 2002 between GK Financing, LLC and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (23)

 

37
 

 

10.48 Line of credit agreement between American Shared Hospital Services and Bank of America dated July 1, 2004 and related amendments No. 1 and No. 2 dated June 23, 2005. (23)

 

10.49 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of May 28, 2004 between GK Financing, LLC and Mercy Health Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (24)

 

10.49a Addendum One to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated effective as of December 23, 2011 between GK Financing, LLC and Mercy Health Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (44)

 

10.50 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of August 7, 2003 between GK Financing, LLC and Baptist Hospital of East Tennessee. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (26)

 

10.50a Amendment No. 1 to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of May 28, 2004 between GK Financing, LLC and Baptist Hospital of East Tennessee. (26)

 

10.51 Addendum Two to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of November 6, 2006 between GK Financing, LLC and Jackson HMA, Inc. d/b/a Central Mississippi Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (28)

 

10.52 Amendment dated as of October 18, 2006 to the GK Financing, LLC Operating Agreement, dated as of October 17, 1995. (28)

 

10.53 Addendum Two to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective January 17, 2007 between GK Financing, LLC and Sunrise Hospital Medical Center, LLC d/b/a Sunrise Hospital Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (29)

 

10.54 Amendment Five to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective May 9, 2007 between GK Financing, LLC and The Regents of the University of California. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (30)

 

10.55 Addendum Two to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective June 20, 2007 between GK Financing, LLC and The Regents of the University of California. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (30)

 

10.56 Agreement to Purchase Gamma Knife Perfexion Unit effective May 7, 2007 between GK Financing, LLC and The Regents of the University of California. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (30)

 

10.57 Purchased Services Agreement for a Gamma Knife Perfexion Unit dated as of March 5, 2008 between GK Financing, LLC and USC University Hospital, Inc. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks). (33)

 

38
 

 

10.57a First Amendment to Purchased Services Agreement for a Gamma Knife Perfexion Unit dated as of April 1, 2009 between GK Financing, LLC and USC University Hospital, Inc. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks). (34)

 

10.58 Addendum Three to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective as of June 20, 2007 between GK Financing, LLC and Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, LLC dba Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (37)

 

10.59 Addendum Four to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective as of February 8, 2010 between GK Financing, LLC and Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, LLC dba Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (37)

 

10.60 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of May 1, 2010 between GK Financing, LLC and Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (39)

 

10.61 Purchase and License Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit and Axesse System dated as of August 25, 2010 between Elekta Instrument AB and Baskent University, Adana, Turkey. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (40)

 

10.61a Assignment Agreement from Elekta Instrument AB to EWRS Tibbi Cihazlar Ticaret Limited Sirketi dated March 11, 2011, for Purchase and License Agreement between Elekta Instrument AB and Baskent University. (40)

 

10.62 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective as of April 8, 2011 between GK Financing, LLC and Lovelace Health System, Inc., d/b/a Lovelace Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (41)

 

10.62a Assignment and Assumption of Purchase and License Agreement with Elekta, Inc., from GK Financing, LLC to Albuquerque Gamma Knife Equipment, LLC dated February 2, 2011. (40)

 

10.63 Purchased Services Agreement for a Gamma Knife Perfexion Unit effective as of August 5, 2011 between Jacksonville GK Equipment, LLC and St. Vincent’s Medical Center, Inc. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks). (43)

 

10.63a First Amendment to Purchased Services Agreement for a Gamma Knife Perfexion Unit effective as of October 10, 2011 between Jacksonville GK Equipment, LLC and St. Vincent’s Medical Center, Inc. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks). (43)

 

39
 

 

10.64 Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit entered into on November 16, 2011 between EWRS TIBBİ CİHAZLAR LTD. TURKEY, and FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE HASTANESİ A.Ş., a Turkish corporation. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (44)

 

10.65 Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion Purchased Services Agreement entered into on January 19, 2012 between GK Financing, LLC and Sacred Heart Health System, Inc. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (45)

 

10.66 Addendum Five to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective as of May 18, 2012 between GK Financing, LLC and Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, LLC (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (47)

 

21. Subsidiaries of American Shared Hospital Services.

 

23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

 

31a. Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications.

 

31b. Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications.

 

32. Section 1350 Certifications (furnished and not to be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K).

 

101. The following materials from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for American Shared Hospital Services for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on March 31, 2014, formatted in XBRL: Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012; Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011; Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011; Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011; Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011; and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, detail tagged.

 

 

(1) These documents were filed as Exhibits 2.1 and 10.13b, respectively, to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(2) This document was filed as Exhibit 3.1 to registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-2 (Registration No. 33-23416), which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(3) These documents were filed as Exhibits 3.2, 4.6 and 4.8, respectively, to registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-63721) filed on October 26, 1995, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(4) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.24 and 10.35, respectively, to registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-2 (Registration No. 33-23416), which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(5) This document was filed as Exhibit A to registrant's Proxy Statement, filed on August 31, 1995, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(6) This document was filed as Exhibit B to registrant's Proxy Statement, filed on August 31, 1995, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(7) These documents were filed as Exhibits 4.14 and 10.13, respectively, to the registrant’s Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-63721) filed on March 29, 1996, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(8) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.8, 10.9, 10.10, 10.11a, 10.11c, 10.11d, 10.12, 10.14, 10.15, 10.16, 10.17, 10.18 and 10.19, respectively, to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

40
 

 

(9) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.20, 10.21, 10.22, 10.23, and 10.24, respectively, to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2000, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(10) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.25, 10.26, 10.27, 10.28 and 10.29, respectively, to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(11) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2000, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(12) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.31 and 10.32, respectively, to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2001, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(13) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.33, 10.34 and 10.35, respectively, to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(14) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2001, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(15) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.37 and 10.38 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(16) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(17) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.40 and 10.41, respectively, to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(18) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.42 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(19) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.43 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(20) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.44 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(21) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.45 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(22) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.18a to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(23) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.46, 10.47 and 10.48, respectively, to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(24) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.22a and 10.49, respectively, to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(25) This document was filed as Exhibit 4 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 1, 1999, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(26) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.23a, 10.50 and 10.50a, respectively, to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(27) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.19a to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(28) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.45a, 10.51 and 10.52, respectively, to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

41
 

 

(29) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.53 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(30) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.35a, 10.54, 10.55 and 10.56, respectively, to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(31) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.19b to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(32) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.23b to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(33) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.30a, 10.30b and 10.57, respectively, to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(34) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.21a, 10.21b and 10.57a, respectively, to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(35) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.26a to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(36) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.23c to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(37) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.19c, 10.58 and 10.59, respectively, to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q /A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(38) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.18b to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(39) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.60 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(40) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.43a, 10.61, 10.61a and 10.62a to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(41) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.62 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(42) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.45b and 10.45c to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(43) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.63 and 10.63a to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(44) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.49a and 10.64 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(45) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.65 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(46) These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.26b, 10.35b, and 10.46a to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013, which are incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(47) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.66 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

(48) This document was filed as Exhibit 10.22b to the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

 

42
 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
  (Registrant)
     
March 31, 2014 By: /s/ Ernest A. Bates, M.D.
    Ernest A. Bates, M.D.
    Chairman of the Board and
    Chief Executive Officer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature   Title   Date
         
/s/ Ernest A. Bates   Chairman of the Board and   March 31, 2014
Ernest A. Bates, M.D.   Chief Executive Officer    
    (Principal Executive Officer)    
         
/s/ David A. Larson   Director   March 31, 2014
David A. Larson, M.D.        
         
/s/ S. Mert Ozyurek   Director   March 31, 2014
S. Mert Ozyurek        
         
/s/ John F. Ruffle   Director   March 31, 2014
John F. Ruffle        
         
/s/ Raymond C. Stachowiak   Director   March 31, 2014
Raymond C. Stachowiak        
         
/s/ Stanley S. Trotman, Jr.   Director   March 31, 2014
Stanley S. Trotman, Jr.        
         
/s/ Craig K. Tagawa   Chief Operating Officer and   March 31, 2014
Craig K. Tagawa   Chief Financial Officer    
    (Principal Accounting Officer)    

 

43
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

and

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

 

 
 

 

CONTENTS

 

  PAGE
   
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 1
   
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Balance sheets 2
Statements of operations 3
Statements of comprehensive income (loss) 4
Statement of shareholders’ equity 5
Statements of cash flows 6
Notes to financial statements 7 – 22

 

 
 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

American Shared Hospital Services

 

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Shared Hospital Services and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of American Shared Hospital Services and subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

 

 

 

/S/ MOSS ADAMS LLP

 

Stockton, California

March 31, 2014 

 

1
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

    DECEMBER 31,  
    2013     2012  
ASSETS                
CURRENT ASSETS                
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 1,909,000     $ 1,564,000  
Restricted cash     50,000       50,000  
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $100,000 in 2013 and 2012     4,522,000       3,706,000  
Other receivables     143,000       401,000  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets     740,000       925,000  
Current deferred tax assets     342,000       310,000  
                 
Total current assets     7,706,000       6,956,000  
                 
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net     51,381,000       53,677,000  
                 
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT     9,000,000       9,000,000  
INVESTMENT IN EQUITY SECURITIES     2,701,000       2,687,000  
OTHER ASSETS     954,000       1,003,000  
                 
TOTAL ASSETS   $ 71,742,000     $ 73,323,000  
                 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
                 
CURRENT LIABILITIES                
Accounts payable   $ 572,000     $ 263,000  
Employee compensation and benefits     204,000       168,000  
Other accrued liabilities     2,238,000       1,548,000  
Current portion of long-term debt     4,804,000       3,932,000  
Current portion of capital leases     3,967,000       3,742,000  
                 
Total current liabilities     11,785,000       9,653,000  
                 
LONG-TERM DEBT, less current portion     10,740,000       13,837,000  
LONG-TERM CAPITAL LEASES, less current portion     12,950,000       13,173,000  
ADVANCES ON LINE OF CREDIT     8,840,000       8,550,000  
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES     3,372,000       3,280,000  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Note 12)                
                 
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
Common stock, no par value                
Authorized – 10,000,000 shares;  Issued and outstanding shares – 4,609,000 in 2013 and 4,606,000 in 2012     8,578,000       8,578,000  
Additional paid-in capital     4,990,000       4,902,000  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (442,000 )     (357,000 )
Retained earnings     6,494,000       6,806,000  
                 
Total equity- American Shared Hospital Services     19,620,000       19,929,000  
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries     4,435,000       4,901,000  
                 
Total shareholders’ equity     24,055,000       24,830,000  
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY   $ 71,742,000     $ 73,323,000  

 

2 See accompanying notes
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

    YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,  
    2013     2012     2011  
Revenue:                        
Medical services   $ 17,584,000     $ 17,048,000     $ 17,237,000  
Equipment sales     -       -       4,984,000  
      17,584,000       17,048,000       22,221,000  
                         
Costs of revenue:                        
Maintenance and supplies     1,791,000       1,529,000       1,484,000  
Depreciation and amortization     6,309,000       5,965,000       6,127,000  
Other direct operating costs     2,540,000       2,624,000       2,467,000  
Cost of equipment sales     -       -       4,146,000  
      10,640,000       10,118,000       14,224,000  
                         
Gross margin     6,944,000       6,930,000       7,997,000  
                         
Selling and administrative expense     4,025,000       4,045,000       4,041,000  
Interest expense     1,799,000       2,155,000       2,367,000  
                         
Operating income     1,120,000       730,000       1,589,000  
                         
Gain(loss) foreign currency transactions     (1,174,000 )     132,000       (27,000 )
Interest and other income     25,000       58,000       135,000  
                         
Income(loss) before income taxes     (29,000 )     920,000       1,697,000  
Income tax expense     84,000       107,000       208,000  
                         
Net income (loss)     (113,000 )     813,000       1,489,000  
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interests     (199,000 )     (775,000 )     (983,000 )
                         
Net income(loss) attributable to American Shared Hospital Services   $ (312,000 )   $ 38,000     $ 506,000  
                         
Net income(loss) per share attributable to American Shared Hospital Services:                        
Earnings(loss) per common share- basic   $ (0.07 )   $ 0.01     $ 0.11  
                         
Earnings(loss) per common share- diluted   $ (0.07 )   $ 0.01     $ 0.11  

 

See accompanying notes 3
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

    YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,  
    2013     2012     2011  
                   
Net income (loss) attributable to American Shared Hospital Services   $ (312,000 )   $ 38,000     $ 506,000  
                         
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:                        
Foreign currency translation adjustments     (142,000 )     (637,000 )     -  
                         
Total comprehensive income (loss)     (454,000 )     (599,000 )     506,000  
Less comprehensive loss attributable to the non-controlling interest     (57,000 )     (280,000 )     -  
                         
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to American Shared Hospital Services   $ (397,000 )   $ (319,000 )   $ 506,000  

 

See accompanying notes 4
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

    THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013  
                      Accumulated                          
                Additional     Other                 Non-controlling        
    Common     Common     Paid-in     Comprehensive     Retained     Sub-Total     Interests in        
    Shares     Stock     Capital     Income (Loss)     Earnings     ASHS     Subsidiaries     Total  
Balances at January 1, 2011     4,597,000     $ 8,606,000     $ 4,703,000     $ -     $ 6,262,000     $ 19,571,000     $ 3,473,000     $ 23,044,000  
Stock based compensation expense     14,000       -       125,000       -       -       125,000       -       125,000  
Non-controlling interest investment in subsidiaries     -       -       -       -       -       -       1,509,000       1,509,000  
Cash distributions to non-controlling interest     -       -       -       -       -       -       (996,000 )     (996,000 )
Net income     -       -       -       -       506,000       506,000       983,000       1,489,000  
Balances at December 31, 2011     4,611,000       8,606,000       4,828,000       -       6,768,000       20,202,000       4,969,000       25,171,000  
Repurchase of common stock     (9,000 )     (28,000 )             -       -       (28,000 )     -       (28,000 )
Stock based compensation expense     4,000       -       74,000       -       -       74,000       -       74,000  
Non-controlling interest investment in subsidiaries     -       -       -       -       -       -       217,000       217,000  
Cumulative translation adjustment     -       -       -       (357,000 )     -       (357,000 )     (280,000 )     (637,000 )
Cash distributions to non-controlling interest     -       -       -       -       -       -       (780,000 )     (780,000 )
Net income     -       -       -       -       38,000       38,000       775,000       813,000  
Balances at December 31, 2012     4,606,000       8,578,000       4,902,000       (357,000 )     6,806,000       19,929,000       4,901,000       24,830,000  
Stock based compensation expense     3,000       -       88,000       -       -       88,000       -       88,000  
Non-controlling interest investment in subsidiaries     -       -       -       -       -       -       184,000       184,000  
Cumulative translation adjustment     -       -       -       (85,000 )     -       (85,000 )     (57,000 )     (142,000 )
Cash distributions to non-controlling interests     -       -       -       -       -       -       (792,000 )     (792,000 )
Net income(loss)     -       -       -       -       (312,000 )     (312,000 )     199,000       (113,000 )
Balances at December 31, 2013     4,609,000     $ 8,578,000     $ 4,990,000     $ (442,000 )   $ 6,494,000     $ 19,620,000     $ 4,435,000     $ 24,055,000  

 

5 See accompanying notes
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

    YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31  
    2013     2012     2011  
                   
OPERATING ACTIVITIES                        
Net income (loss)   $ (113,000 )   $ 813,000     $ 1,489,000  
Adjustments to reconcile net income                        
to net cash from operating activities:                        
Depreciation and amortization     6,410,000       6,096,000       6,272,000  
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets     20,000       3,000       (72,000 )
Deferred income tax     59,000       25,000       76,000  
(Gain) loss on foreign currency transactions     1,174,000       (132,000 )     27,000  
Stock-based compensation expense     88,000       74,000       125,000  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                        
Receivables     (643,000 )     655,000       (961,000 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets     58,000       (316,000 )     (1,063,000 )
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities     1,023,000       (349,000 )     957,000  
                         
Net cash from operating activities     8,076,000       6,869,000       6,850,000  
                         
INVESTING ACTIVITIES                        
Payment for purchase of property and equipment     (1,710,000 )     (6,634,000 )     (5,613,000 )
Investment in equity securities     (14,000 )     (31,000 )     (39,000 )
                         
Net cash from investing activities     (1,724,000 )     (6,665,000 )     (5,652,000 )
                         
FINANCING ACTIVITIES                        
Principal payments on long-term debt     (3,523,000 )     (6,818,000 )     (3,889,000 )
Principal payments on capital leases     (3,476,000 )     (3,732,000 )     (2,983,000 )
Long term debt financing on property and equipment     1,298,000       9,219,000       6,980,000  
Advances on line of credit     369,000       1,300,000       350,000  
Payments on line of credit     (79,000 )     (600,000 )     (1,000,000 )
Capital contributions from non-controlling interests     184,000       217,000       1,509,000  
Distributions to non-controlling interests     (792,000 )     (780,000 )     (996,000 )
Stock repurchase     -       (28,000 )     -  
                         
Net cash from financing activities     (6,019,000 )     (1,222,000 )     (29,000 )
                         
Net change in cash and cash equivalents     333,000       (1,018,000 )     1,169,000  
                         
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on cash     12,000       2,000       (27,000 )
                         
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year     1,564,000       2,580,000       1,438,000  
                         
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year   $ 1,909,000     $ 1,564,000     $ 2,580,000  
                         
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE                        
Cash paid for interest   $ 2,116,000     $ 2,352,000     $ 2,503,000  
Cash paid for income taxes   $ 44,000     $ 158,000     $ 90,000  
                         
SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES                        
Acquisition of equipment with capital lease financing   $ 3,478,000     $ 264,000     $ 6,400,000  

 

6 See accompanying notes
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 1 – Business and Basis of Presentation

 

Business These financial statements include the accounts of American Shared Hospital Services (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries as follows: The Company wholly-owns the subsidiaries OR21, Inc. (“OR21”); MedLeader.com, Inc. (“MedLeader”), American Shared Radiosurgery Services (“ASRS”), ASHSDB#1, LLC (“ASHSDB1”), and ASHSDB#2 LLC (“ASHSDB2”); ASHSDB1 and ASHSDB2 each own 50% of the subsidiary ASHS do Brasil Equipamentos Medicos LTDA (“ASHS do Brasil”). The Company is also the majority owner of Long Beach Equipment, LLC (“LBE”). ASRS is the majority-owner of GK Financing, LLC (“GKF”) which wholly-owns the subsidiaries GK Financing U.K., Limited (“GKUK”), Instituto de Gamma Knife del Pacifico S.A.C. (“GKPeru”), GKFDB#1, LLC (“GKFDB1”), and GKFDB#2, LLC (“GKFDB2”). GKFDB1 and GKFDB2 each own 50% of the subsidiary GKF do Brasil Equipamentos Medicos LTDA (“GKF do Brasil”). GKF is also the majority-owner of the subsidiaries Albuquerque GK Equipment, LLC (“AGKE”), Jacksonville GK Equipment, LLC (“JGKE”) and EWRS, LLC (“EWRS”), which wholly-owns the subsidiary, EWRS Tibbi Cihazlar Ticaret Ltd Sti (“EWRS Turkey”).

 

The Company (through ASRS) and Elekta AB, the manufacturer of the Gamma Knife (through its wholly-owned United States subsidiary, GKV Investments, Inc.), entered into an operating agreement and formed GK Financing, LLC. During 2012 GKF provided Gamma Knife units to seventeen medical centers in the United States in the states of Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Ohio, Texas and Wisconsin, and two medical centers in Turkey, in the cities of Adana and Istanbul.

 

The Company also provides radiation therapy and related equipment directly to a medical center in Massachusetts and through GKF to a medical center in Adana, Turkey.

 

The Company has formed the subsidiaries GKUK, GKPeru, EWRS, EWRS Turkey, ASHSDB1, ASHSDB2, ASHS do Brasil, GKFDB1, GKFDB2, and GKF do Brasil for the purposes of expanding its business internationally into the United Kingdom, Peru, Turkey and Brazil; LBE to provide proton beam therapy services in Long Beach, California; and AGKE and JGKE to provide Gamma Knife services in Albuquerque, New Mexico and Jacksonville, Florida. AGKE, JGKE and EWRS Turkey all began operation in 2011. GKPeru and LBE are under development, GKUK is inactive, and the Company is in the final stages of liquidating GKF do Brazil and ASHS do Brazil .

 

OR21 will provide the product “The Operating Room for the 21st Century SM ”, which is currently under development.

 

MedLeader was formed to provide continuing medical education online and through videos for doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers. This subsidiary is not operational at this time.

 

All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Note 2 – Accounting Policies

 

Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements – In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant accounting estimates reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements include the allowance for doubtful accounts, estimated useful lives of fixed assets and salvage values, and the fair value of financial instruments.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Cash and cash equivalents – The Company considers all liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Restricted cash is not considered a cash equivalent for purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows.

 

7  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 2 – Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Restricted cash – Restricted cash represents the minimum cash that must be maintained in GKF to fund operations.

 

Business and credit risk – The Company maintains its cash balances, which exceed federally insured limits, in financial institutions. Currently much of the Company’s cash is invested in a certificate of deposit. The Company has not experienced any losses and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash, cash equivalents and securities. The Company monitors the financial condition of the financial institutions it uses on a regular basis.

 

All of the Company’s revenue was provided by nineteen customers in 2013 and 2012, and these customers constitute accounts receivable at December 31, 2013 and 2012. The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. The Company has not experienced significant losses related to receivables from individual customers or groups of customers in any particular geographic area.

 

Accounts receivable and doubtful accounts – Accounts receivable are recorded at net realizable value. An allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on historical collections plus an allowance for probable losses. Receivables are considered past due based on contractual terms and are charged off in the period that they are deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of receivables previously charged off are recorded as revenue when received.

 

Non-controlling interests - The Company reports its non-controlling interests as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. The Company also presents the consolidated net income and the portion of the consolidated net income and other comprehensive income allocable to the non-controlling interests and to the shareholders of the Company separately in its consolidated statements of income.

 

Property and equipment – Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which for medical and office equipment is generally 3 – 15 years, and after accounting for salvage value on the equipment where indicated. Salvage value is based on the estimated fair value of the equipment at the end of its useful life. The Company capitalized interest of $390,000 and $196,000 in 2013 and 2012, respectively, as costs of medical equipment.

 

The Company leases Gamma Knife and radiation therapy equipment to its customers under arrangements typically accounted for as operating leases. At December 31, 2013, the Company held equipment under operating lease contracts with customers with an original cost of $79,828,000 and accumulated depreciation of $44,630,000. At December 31, 2012, the Company held equipment under operating lease contracts with customers with an original cost of $80,884,000 and accumulated depreciation of $38,515,000.

 

Certificate of deposit – As of December 31, 2013, the Company had a $9,000,000 principal investment in certificate of deposit with a bank with an interest rate of .10% and a maturity date in August 2014. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had a $9,000,000 principal investment in a certificate of deposit with a bank with an interest rate of 0.45% and a maturity date in August 2013.

 

Investment in equity securities – As of December 31, 2013 the Company has common stock representing an approximate 0.77% interest in Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. (“Mevion”), and accounts for this investment under the cost method. The cost of the Company’s investment in Mevion was $2,701,000 as of December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2012 the Company has a convertible preferred stock investment representing an approximate 1.0% interest in Mevion. The cost of the Company’s investment in Mevion was $2,687,000 as of December 31, 2012. The Company reviews its investment in Mevion for impairment on a quarterly basis, or as events or circumstances might indicate that the carrying value of the investment may not be recoverable. See Note 4 – Investment in Equity Securities for further discussion.

 

Fair value of financial instruments – The Company’s disclosures of the fair value of financial instruments is based on a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels. Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices

within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for assets or liabilities, and reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

 

8  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 2 – Accounting Policies (continued)

 

The estimated fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows (in thousands):

 

    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total     Carrying
Value
 
December 31, 2013                                        
                                         
Assets:                                        
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash   $ 1,959                     $ 1,959     $ 10,959  
Receivables     4,665                       4,665       4,665  
Certificate of deposit     9,000                       9,000       9,000  
Investment in equity securities                     300       300       2,701  
Total   $ 15,624     $ -     $ 300     $ 15,924     $ 27,325  
                                         
Liabilities                                        
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities   $ 3,014                     $ 3,014     $ 3,014  
Advances on line of credit     8,840                       8,840       8,840  
Debt obligations                     32,418       32,418       32,461  
Total   $ 11,854     $ -     $ 32,418     $ 44,272     $ 44,315  
                                         
December 31, 2012                                        
                                         
Assets:                                        
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash   $ 1,614                     $ 1,614     $ 10,614  
Receivables     4,107                       4,107       4,107  
Certificate of deposit     9,000                       9,000       9,000  
Investment in equity securities                     1,300       1,300       2,687  
Total   $ 14,721     $ -     $ 1,300     $ 16,021     $ 26,408  
                                         
Liabilities                                        
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities   $ 1,979                     $ 1,979     $ 1,979  
Advances on line of credit     8,550                       8,550       8,550  
Debt obligations                     34,577       34,577       34,684  
Total   $ 10,529     $ -     $ 34,577     $ 45,106     $ 45,213  

 

Revenue recognition - Revenue is recognized when services have been rendered and collectability is reasonably assured. Other than one contract, there are no guaranteed minimum payments. The Company’s contracts are typically for a ten year term and are classified as either fee per use or retail. Retail arrangements are further classified as either turn-key or revenue sharing.

 

Revenue from fee per use contracts is recorded on a gross basis as determined by each hospital’s contracted rate. Under revenue sharing arrangements, the Company receives a contracted percentage of the reimbursement received by the hospital. The gross amount the Company expects to receive is recorded as revenue and estimated based on historical experience. Under turn-key arrangements, the Company receives payment from the hospital in the amount of its reimbursement from third party payors, and is responsible for paying all the operating costs of the Gamma Knife. The gross amount the Company expects to receive is recorded as revenue and estimated based on historical experience and hospital contracts with third party payors. Revenue estimates are reviewed periodically and adjusted as necessary. Revenue recognition is consistent with guidelines provided under the applicable accounting standards for revenue recognition.

 

9  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 2 – Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Stock-based compensation – The Company measures all employee stock-based compensation awards at fair value and records such expense in its consolidated financial statements. See Note 9 for additional information on the Company’s stock-based compensation programs.

 

Income taxes – The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. See Note 8 for further discussion on income taxes.

 

Functional currency - Based on guidance provided in accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters (“ASC 830”), the Company analyzes its operations outside the United States to determine the functional currency of each operation. Management has determined that these operations are initially accounted for in U.S. dollars since the primary transactions incurred are in U.S. dollars and the Company provides significant funding towards the startup of the operation. When Management determines that an operation has become predominantly self-sufficient, the Company will change its accounting for the operation to the local currency from the U.S. dollar.

 

The Company determined that its Turkish operation, EWRS Turkey, should change from the U.S. dollar to the Turkish lira effective in the third quarter 2012. Therefore, in accordance with ASC 830, EWRS Turkey’s balance sheet accounts were translated at rates in effect as of August 31, 2012, or other rates in accordance with guidance provided under ASC 830, and accumulated gains and losses and translation differences were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, which is a separate component of equity. At the Company’s year-end, EWRS Turkey’s balance sheet accounts were translated at rates in effect as of December 31, 2013, and income and expense accounts were translated at the weighted average rates of exchange during the period following the change. Translation adjustments resulting from this process were also recognized under accumulated other comprehensive loss.

 

Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are listed in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The net foreign currency loss for 2013 was approximately $1,174,000, compared to a gain of $132,000 in 2012 and a loss of $27,000 in 2011.

 

Earnings per share – Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if common shares were issued pursuant to the exercise of options or warrants. The following table illustrates the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

 

10  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   

Note 2 – Accounting Policies (continued)

 

    2013     2012     2011  
                   
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share   $ (312,000 )   $ 38,000     $ 506,000  
                         
Denominator:                        
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share – weighted-average shares     4,608,000       4,609,000       4,607,000  
Effect of dilutive securities  Employee stock options/restricted stock units     3,000       21,000       15,000  
                         
Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share – adjusted weighted-  average shares     4,611,000       4,630,000       4,622,000  
                         
Earnings (loss) per share – basic   $ (0.07 )   $ 0.01     $ 0.11  
                         
Earnings (loss) per share – diluted   $ (0.07 )   $ 0.01     $ 0.11  

 

In 2013, options outstanding to purchase 576,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price range of $2.30 - $6.50 per share were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they would be anti-dilutive.

 

In 2012, options outstanding to purchase 588,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price range of $2.76 - $6.50 per share were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they would be anti-dilutive.

 

In 2011, options outstanding to purchase 570,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price range of $2.76 - $6.50 per share were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they would be anti-dilutive.

 

Business segment information - The Company, which engages in the business of leasing radiosurgery and radiation therapy equipment to health care providers, has one reportable segment, Medical Services Revenue.

 

Reclassifications – Certain comparative balances for the year ended December 31, 2012 have been reclassified to make them consistent with the current year presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on the change in retained earnings for 2012.

 

11  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 3 – Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment consists of the following:

 

    DECEMBER 31,  
    2013     2012  
             
Medical equipment and facilities   $ 86,712,000     $ 84,453,000  
Office equipment     749,000       694,000  
Deposits and construction in progress     4,719,000       6,754,000  
Deposits towards purchase of proton beam systems     3,000,000       3,000,000  
                 
      95,180,000       94,901,000  
Accumulated depreciation     (43,799,000 )     (41,224,000 )
                 
Net property and equipment   $ 51,381,000     $ 53,677,000  

 

The Company has equipment that is secured under capitalized leases, which is included in Medical equipment and facilities, with a total cost of $46,865,000 and associated accumulated depreciation of $26,817,000 as of December 31, 2013 and a total cost of $41,306,000 and associated accumulated depreciation of $18,173,000 as of December 31, 2012.

 

As of December 31, 2013, the Company has $1,000,000 per system in deposits ($3,000,000 in total) toward the purchase of three MEVION S250 proton beam radiation therapy (“PBRT”) systems from Mevion Medical Systems, Inc., a development-stage company. The Company has a commitment for the remaining balance for each system. The delivery date for the first machine is anticipated to be in 2014. The Company has entered into a partnership agreement with a radiation oncology physician group, which has contributed $400,000 towards the deposits on the third machine. The first Mevion PBRT system treated a patient in December 2013. The Company reviews the carrying value of these deposits for impairment on a quarterly basis, or as events or circumstances might indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. See Note 12-Commitments and Contingencies for additional discussion on purchase commitments.

 

Note 4 – Investment in Equity Securities

 

On April 10, 2006 the Company invested $2,000,000 for a convertible preferred stock interest in Mevion Medical Systems, formerly Still River Systems, Inc., a development-stage company based in Littleton, Massachusetts, which in collaboration with scientists from MIT’s Plasma Science and Fusion Center, is developing a medical device for the treatment of cancer patients using proton beam radiation therapy. The Company also has deposits towards the purchase of three Mevion PBRT systems as described more fully in Note 3.

 

The Company’s initial investment in Mevion consisted of approximately 2,353,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is considered pari passu with previously issued Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

 

On September 5, 2007 the Company invested approximately $617,000 for an additional equity interest in Mevion. This investment represented approximately 588,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, which is considered pari passu with the previously issued Series A and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (all issues together “Preferred Stock”).

 

12  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 4 – Investment in Equity Securities (continued)

 

Since October 2008 Mevion had continued to offer a sequence of Series D rounds of funding to raise cash for its next phase of development and continued manufacture of the prototype model of the proton beam unit. Due to the troubled economy and scarcity of funds available during this time, these rounds were offered at a price less than the Company’s investment. Mevion received approximately $65 million from these Series D rounds.

 

In mid-2011, Mevion performed a reverse stock split of all shares in which 100 shares were converted to one share. The reason for the reverse stock split was to move the number of outstanding shares and price per share more in line with industry norms. The reverse stock split did not change any investor’s relative ownership in Mevion.

 

In January 2012, Mevion announced that it had closed a $45 million Series E round of financing which was used to accelerate the manufacturing and worldwide deployment of the Mevion S250. This round of financing was offered at a price per share higher than the effective price of the most recent Series D financing, and initially funded at 55%, with the remaining 45% due upon Mevion’s receipt of final FDA 510(k) clearance, which occurred during the second quarter 2012. The Company invested an additional $70,000 in the Series E round.

 

In June 2013, Mevion announced that it had secured a $55 million round of financing, which will be used to accelerate the manufacturing and worldwide deployment of the Mevion S250. This round of financing was offered at a price per share higher than the effective price of the most recent Series E financing. The Company did not participate in this round of funding. Subject to the Pay-to-Play Provision, implemented through the amendment of the Sixth Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, the preferred shares held by the Company were converted to common.

 

Upon conversion of the Preferred Stock, the Company’s investment represents an approximate 0.77% interest in the common stock of Mevion as of December 31, 2013. The Company does not have a Board of Directors seat with Mevion.

 

The Company accounts for its investment in Mevion under the cost method and evaluates the investment for impairment on a quarterly basis or as events or circumstances might indicate that the carrying value of the investment may not be recoverable. The Company reviewed its investment in Mevion at December 31, 2013 in light of both current market conditions and the ongoing needs of Mevion to raise cash to continue its development of the first compact, single room PBRT system.

 

The lower price per share of the Series D and Series E offerings could be viewed as a reasonable estimate of the fair value of our cost-method investment, indicating that our investment is impaired. The Company estimates that there is currently an unrealized loss (impairment) of approximately $2.4 million based on the issuance of the Series E funding compared to the Company’s cost of its investment.

 

In assessing whether the impairment is other than temporary, we evaluated the length of time and extent to which market value has been below cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of Mevion and our ability and intent to retain our investment for a period sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in the market value. Although the investment is not without certain risk, and the manufacture of the first unit has taken longer than originally anticipated, the Company believes that the current market value is a temporary situation and that the successful operation of the first Mevion S250 System and Mevion’s significant revenue backlog provide a higher potential valuation.

 

13  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 5 – Long-Term Debt

 

Long-term debt consists primarily of eleven notes with financing companies, related to Gamma Knife and radiation therapy equipment, construction and installation, totaling $15,544,000, as of December 31, 2013. These notes are payable in 36 to 84 monthly installments, mature between December 2014 and December 2019, and are collateralized by the respective Gamma Knife units and radiation therapy equipment. Eight of the notes accrue interest at fixed annual rates between 3.95% and 7.58%, and three of the notes accrue interest at semi-annually adjusted variable rates that are approximately 2.5% as of December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2012 long-term debt consisted of nine notes totaling $17,769,000. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants required under notes with its lenders. The following are contractual maturities of long-term debt by year at December 31, 2013:

 

Year ending December 31,        
2014   $ 4,804,000  
2015     3,533,000  
2016     3,641,000  
2017     2,006,000  
2018     1,080,000  
Thereafter     480,000  
         
    $ 15,544,000  

 

Note 6 – Obligations Under Capital Leases

 

The Company has nine capital lease obligations with four financing companies, collateralized by Gamma Knife equipment having an aggregate net book value of $23,755,000 at December 31, 2013. These obligations have stated interest rates ranging between 5.62% and 9.73%, are payable in 60 to 84 monthly installments, and mature between March 2014 and June 2020. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had nine capital lease obligations with four finance companies with an aggregate net book value of $23,133,000. Future minimum lease payments, together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments under capital leases at December 31, 2013, are summarized as follows:

 

    Net Present Value  
    of Minimum  
    Lease Payments  
Year ending December 31,        
2014   $ 5,140,000  
2015     4,809,000  
2016     4,090,000  
2017     3,335,000  
2018     1,709,000  
Thereafter     814,000  
Total capital lease payments     19,897,000  
Less imputed interest     2,980,000  
      16,917,000  
Less current portion     3,967,000  
    $ 12,950,000  

 

14  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 7 – Line of Credit

 

The Company has a $9,000,000 renewable line of credit with a bank that is secured by a certificate of deposit. The line of credit has been in place since June 2004 and has a maturity date of August 1, 2015. Borrowing under the line of credit is subject to interest expense at a rate equal to the bank’s prime rate minus 0.5 percentage point, or alternatively at the Company’s discretion, the LIBOR rate plus 1.0 percentage point. The weighted average interest rate on money borrowed against the line of credit during 2013 was 1.45%. The Company is in compliance with all debt covenants required. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, there was $8,840,000 and $8,550,000 borrowed against the line of credit, respectively.

 

Note 8 – Income Taxes

 

The Company has adopted accounting standards which prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a company’s income tax return, and also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. Additionally, these accounting standards specify that tax positions for which the timing of the ultimate resolution is uncertain should be recognized as long-term liabilities. The Company has made no reclassifications between current taxes payable and long term taxes payable under this guidance. Also, the Company had no amounts of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect its effective income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

 

The Company’s policy for deducting interest and penalties is to treat interest as interest expense and penalties as taxes. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had no amount accrued for the payment of interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits.

 

The tax return years 2009 through 2013 remain open to examination by the major domestic taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject. Net operating losses generated on a tax return basis by the Company for calendar years 1999 through 2004, 2009, 2010 and 2012 remain open to examination by the major domestic taxing jurisdictions.

 

15  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 8 – Income Taxes (continued)

 

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax liabilities and assets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

 

    DECEMBER 31,  
    2013     2012  
Deferred tax liabilities:                
Fixed assets   $ (7,201,000 )   $ (7,218,000 )
Total deferred tax liabilities     (7,201,000 )     (7,218,000 )
                 
Deferred tax assets:                
Net operating loss carryforwards     3,607,000       3,767,000  
Accruals and allowances     240,000       233,000  
Tax credits     318,000       334,000  
Other – net     101,000       77,000  
                 
Total deferred tax assets     4,266,000       4,411,000  
                 
Valuation allowance     (95,000 )     (163,000 )
                 
Deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance     4,171,000       4,248,000  
                 
Net deferred tax liabilities   $ (3,030,000 )   $ (2,970,000 )

 

These amounts are presented in the financial statements as follows:

 

    DECEMBER 31,  
    2013     2012  
             
Current deferred tax assets   $ 342,000     $ 310,000  
Deferred income taxes (non-current)     (3,372,000 )     (3,280,000 )
                 
    $ (3,030,000 )   $ (2,970,000 )

 

16  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 8 – Income Taxes (continued)

 

The components of the provision for income taxes consist of the following:

 

    DECEMBER 31,  
    2013     2012  
             
Current deferred tax assets   $ 342,000     $ 310,000  
Deferred income taxes (non-current)     (3,372,000 )     (3,280,000 )
                 
    $ (3,030,000 )   $ (2,970,000 )

 

 

    YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,  
    2013     2012     2011  
Current:                        
Federal   $ -     $ 18,000     $ -  
State   $ 23,000     $ 65,000     $ 128,000  
Foreign     -       -       4,000  
Total current     23,000       83,000       132,000  
                         
Deferred:                        
Federal     184,000       95,000       305,000  
State     12,000       (41,000 )     (229,000 )
Foreign     (135,000 )     (30,000 )     -  
Total deferred     61,000       24,000       76,000  
                         
    $ 84,000     $ 107,000     $ 208,000  

 

The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory tax rate (34% in 2013, 2012 and 2011) to income before taxes as follows:

 

    YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,  
    2013     2012     2011  
                   
Computed expected federal income tax   $ (92,000 )   $ 49,000     $ 243,000  
State income taxes, net of federal benefit     119,000       38,000       (144,000 )
Non-deductible expenses     28,000       24,000       41,000  
Other     29,000       (4,000 )     68,000  
                         
    $ 84,000     $ 107,000     $ 208,000  

 

 

17  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 8 – Income Taxes (continued)

 

At December 31, 2013, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax return purposes of approximately $9,609,000 which expire between 2019 and 2032. The Company has net operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes of approximately $1,752,000 that begin to expire in 2014. A substantial part of this carryforward is subject to separate return limitations.

 

The Company’s ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets may be limited in the event of a 50% or more ownership change within any three-year period. Future federal net operating losses generated by the Company can be carried forward for 20 years.

 

It is the intention of the Company to reinvest the earnings of its non-U.S. subsidiaries in those operations. The company does not provide for U.S. income taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries as such earnings are to be reinvested indefinitely. As of December 31, 2013, there is a minimal cumulative amount of earnings upon which U.S. income taxes have not been provided.

 

Note 9 – Shareholders’ Equity

 

Incentive Compensation Plan

 

In June 2010 shareholders approved an amendment and restatement of the Company’s stock incentive plan, renaming it the Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), and among other things, increasing the number of shares of the Company’s common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan to 1,630,000. The Plan provides that the shares reserved under the Plan are available for issuance to officers of the Company, other key employees, non-employee directors, and advisors. The Plan is a successor to the Company’s previous plans, and any shares awarded and outstanding under those plans were transferred to the Plan. No further grants or share issuances will be made under the previous plans.

 

The Plan provides for nonqualified stock options, qualified (or incentive) stock options and stock grants. The Plan has a provision to reduce the number of shares reserved for award and issuance under the Plan by a ratio of 1.59 shares of common stock for each share of common stock that is issued pursuant to a Full Value Award (stock grant).

 

The Plan also provides for an Incentive Bonus Program with incentive bonus opportunities through performance unit awards and special cash incentive programs tied to the attainment of pre-established performance milestones.

 

Provisions of the Plan include an automatic annual grant to each non-employee director of options to purchase up to 2,000 shares on the date of the Company’s Annual Shareholder Meeting, at an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s common shares on that date, and an automatic annual grant of 500 restricted stock units of the Company’s common shares. Options and restricted stock units awarded under the automatic annual grant program for non-employee directors vest after one year. Other options may vest fully and immediately, or over periods of time as determined by the Plan Administrator, but no longer than seven years from the grant date. Discretionary options currently awarded under the Plan vest over a period of 5 years.

 

Under the Plan, a total of 18,000 restricted stock units have been granted, consisting of annual automatic grants to non-employee directors and the corporate secretary. The Company granted 3,000 shares of restricted stock in 2013 with a fair value of $2.16 per share. For the year ended December 31, 2013, total compensation expense recorded in the consolidated statements of income related to restricted stock units was $3,700, with an offsetting tax benefit of $1,800, as this expense is deductible for income tax purposes. As of December 31, 2013, there was $1,700 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted sock units which is expected to be recognized over a period of .5 years. During 2013, shares of restricted stock units totaling 3,000 with a fair value of $6,180 were vested and became unrestricted.

 

18  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 9 – Shareholders’ Equity (continued)

 

Changes in options outstanding under the Stock Option Plans during 2013 are as follows :

 

                Weighted        
          Weighted     Average        
          Average     Remaining     Aggregate  
    Number     Exercise     Contractual     Intrinsic  
Options   of Options     Price     Term (Years)     Value  
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2012     596,000     $ 3.58                  
Granted     21,500     $ 2.23                  
Exercised     -     $ -                  
Forfeited     (16,500 )   $ 4.50                  
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2013     601,000     $ 3.50       1.42     $ -  
                                 
Exercisable at December 31, 2013     575,900     $ 3.55       1.18     $ -  

 

The weighted average grant-date fair value of the options granted during the years 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $1.28, $1.60, and $1.51 respectively. There was no total intrinsic value of options exercised during any of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and 2011.

 

There was no cash received from options exercised under any share-based payment arrangements for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and as a result, there was no actual tax benefit realized for tax deductions from option exercises in any of those years.

 

A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested options as of December 31, 2013, and changes during the year ended December 31, 2013 is presented below:

 

          Weighted  
          Average  
    Number     Grant-Date  
Nonvested Options   of Options     Fair Value  
                 
Nonvested at December 31, 2012     35,000     $ 1.28  
Granted     21,500     $ 1.28  
Vested     (14,000 )   $ 1.29  
Forfeited     (16,500 )   $ 1.46  
                 
Nonvested at December 31, 2013     26,000     $ 1.25  

 

At December 31, 2013, there was approximately $54,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately five years.

 

19  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 9 – Shareholders’ Equity (continued)

 

The Company’s stock-based awards to employees are calculated using the Black-Scholes options valuation model. The Black-Scholes model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, the Black-Scholes model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. The Company’s stock-based awards have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the present value estimates. For these reasons, management believes that the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its stock-based awards to employees.

 

The fair value of the Company’s option grants issued during 2013, 2012 and 2011 were estimated using assumptions for expected life, volatility, dividend yield, forfeiture rate, and risk-free interest rate which are specific to each award as summarized in the following table. The estimated fair value of the Company’s options is amortized over the period during which the optionee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period.

 

The fair value of the Company’s option grants under the Plan in 2013, 2012 and 2011 was estimated assuming the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

    2013     2012     2011  
                   
Expected life (years)     7.0       7.0       7.0  
Expected forfeiture rate     0.0 %     0.0 -   4.0 %     2.0 -   3.7 %
Expected volatility     49 %     40 - 45 %     40 - 45 %
Dividend yield     0.0 %     0.0 %     0.0 %
Risk-free interest rate     2.6 - 3.0 %     1.7 %     3.0 -  3.3 %

 

Repurchase of Common Stock, Common Stock Warrants and Stock Options

 

In 1999 and 2001, the Board of Directors approved resolutions authorizing the Company to repurchase up to a total of 1,000,000 shares of its own stock on the open market, which the Board reaffirmed in 2008. There were no shares of the Company repurchased during 2013. During 2012 the Company repurchased approximately 9,000 shares of its stock on the open market. There were no shares of the Company’s stock repurchased during 2011. There are approximately 72,000 shares remaining under this repurchase authorization.

 

Note 10 – Retirement Plan

 

The Company has a defined-contribution retirement plan (the “Retirement Plan”) that allows for a matching safe harbor contribution. For 2013, the Board of Directors elected to match participant deferred salary contributions up to a maximum of 4% of the participant’s annual compensation. Discretionary profit sharing contributions are allowed under the Retirement Plan in years that the Board does not elect a safe harbor match. The Company has accrued approximately $48,000 for the estimated safe harbor matching contribution for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company contributed $41,000 and $42,000 to the Retirement Plan for the safe harbor match for the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

 

20  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 11 – Operating Leases

 

The Company leases office space and equipment under operating leases expiring at various dates through 2016.

 

Future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases having initial terms of more than one year consisted of the following:

 

Year ending December 31,        
         
2014     304,237  
2015     305,559  
2016     125,640  
2017     -  
2018     -  
         
    $ 735,435  

 

Payments for repair and maintenance agreements incorporated in operating lease agreements are included in the future minimum operating lease payments shown above.

 

Rent expense was $549,000, $438,000, and $423,000 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and includes the above operating leases as well as month-to-month rental and certain executory costs. In 2013, the Company subleased a portion of its existing office space through the remainder of its lease term at a rate lower than is lease rate, resulting in a cumulative loss of $115,000. This loss will be amortized against total rent expense over the term of the sublease and it is included in total rent expense for 2013.

 

Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies

 

As of December 31, 2013, the Company has commitments to purchase three PBRT systems, three Gamma Knife Perfexion systems, and one Gamma Knife model 4C system. These commitments total approximately $50,309,000, and the Company has made deposits and progress payments totaling approximately $5,884,000 towards the purchase of this equipment. One Perfexion system is scheduled to be installed some time in 2014 at a new customer site in Oregon, and a second Perfexion system in the first quarter 2014 at an existing customer site. The Gamma Knife model 4C system is projected to be installed in the fourth quarter 2014 at the Company’s new customer site in Peru. The remaining Perfexion is for a site yet to be determined. The three PBRT systems currently have anticipated delivery dates in 2014 and later, pending certain construction milestones. The deposits and progress payments are classified as deposits and construction in progress under Property and Equipment.

 

Note 13 – Significant Related Party Transactions

 

The Company’s Gamma Knife and IGRT businesses in Turkey are operated through EWRS Turkey. GKF owns indirectly 70% of EWRS Turkey, through its 70% ownership of EWRS LLC. The remaining 30% ownership of EWRS LLC is held by EMKA LLC (“EMKA”). EMKA is owned and operated by Mert Ozyurek (“Mr. Ozyurek”) who also sits on the Board of Directors of the Company. Mr. Ozyurek operates a foreign company called Ozyurek A.S. EWRS Turkey purchased its two Gamma Knife units from Ozyurek A.S. and has contracts for service and maintenance on the machines. The Company believes all its transactions with Mr. Ozyurek are arm’s-length transactions.

 

The Company’s Gamma Knife business is operated through its 81% indirect interest in its GKF subsidiary. The remaining 19% of GKF is owned by a wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of Elekta, which is the manufacturer of the Gamma Knife. Since the Company purchases its units from Elekta, there are significant related party transactions with Elekta such as equipment purchases, commitments to purchase equipment, deposits for such equipment purchases, and costs to maintain the equipment. The Company believes that all its transactions with Elekta are arm’s-length transactions. At December 31, 2013, the Company had commitments to purchase four Gamma Knife systems as discussed in Note 12.

 

21  
 

 

AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 14 – Major Customers

 

The Company’s revenue was provided by nineteen customers in 2013 and 2012, and twenty-one customers in 2011. In 2013, two customers each accounted for approximately 10% of total revenue, each. In 2012, two customers each accounted for approximately 13% and 11% of total revenue. In 2011, one customer accounted for approximately 25% of total revenue.

 

 

Note 15 – Subsequent Events

 

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were available to be issued.

 

22  

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 10.22b

 

Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.

 

LEASE AGREEMENT FOR A GAMMA KNIFE UNIT

(PERFEXION UPGRADE)

 

This LEASE AGREEMENT FOR A GAMMA KNIFE UNIT (PERFEXION UPGRADE) (this "Agreement") is dated effective July 30, 2013 (the "Effective Date"), and is entered into by and between TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER, INC., a not-for-profit Massachusetts corporation (formerly known as New England Medical Center Hospitals, Inc.) ("Medical Center"), and GK FINANCING, LLC, a California limited liability company ("GKF").

 

Recitals:

 

A.       GKF and Medical Center entered into a Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated October 5, 1998, which was amended by a certain Addendum to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated effective April 1, 2005 (collectively, the "Prior Lease"). Pursuant to the Lease, GKF is leasing to Medical Center a Leksell Stereotactic Gamma Knife unit, Model 4C (the “Model 4C”).

 

B.       On February 28, 2008, Medical Center changed its name from New England Medical Center Hospitals, Inc. to Tufts Medical Center, Inc.

 

C.       The parties intend to upgrade the Model 4C to a Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion which will be equipped with new cobalt-60 (the "Equipment" or "Perfexion") which will be leased by GKF to Medical Center pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

 

Agreement:

 

NOW, THEREFORE , in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

 

1.           Lease . Subject to and in accordance with the covenants and conditions set forth in this Agreement, GKF hereby leases to Medical Center, and Medical Center hereby leases from GKF, the Equipment. The Equipment to be leased to Medical Center pursuant to this Agreement shall include the latest approved Gamma Knife technology available as of the date of this Agreement, including all hardware and software related thereto as listed in the Specifications.

 

2.           Execution of LGK Agreement by and between Medical Center and Elekta . Medical Center agrees that simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement it shall execute that certain LGK Agreement with Elekta, (hereinafter referred to as the "LGK Agreement"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by this reference. GKF hereby grants to Medical Center a non-exclusive right and sublicense to use the "LGP Software" as defined in and contemplated under, and subject to the terms and conditions of, the LGK Agreement.

 

1
Exhibit 10.22b

 

3.           Perfexion Upgrade .

 

3.1           Subject to the terms and conditions set forth below, GKF, at GKF's cost and expense, shall upgrade the Model 4C to the Equipment described in Recital C above (the "Perfexion Upgrade"). GKF shall be responsible for all third party costs related to installation and rigging associated with the Perfexion and de-installation of the Model 4C. In connection with the Perfexion Upgrade, GKF shall also upgrade the flooring and painting in the Medical Center gamma knife suite. In connection with the Perfexion Upgrade, Medical Center, at Medical Center's cost and expense, shall provide GKF with Medical Center personnel (including Medical Center physicists) and services upon request and as required by GKF, among other things, to oversee, supervise and assist with construction and compliance with local, state and federal regulatory requirements and with nuclear regulatory compliance issues and the calibration of the Perfexion, and modification of the Determination of Need, as necessary. Subject to Medical Center's compliance with Section 3.2 below, GKF shall use commercially reasonable efforts to perform the Perfexion Upgrade in the Fall of 2013. The Parties agree that, once the Model 4C is no longer operable due to the commencement of de-installation, GKF will use commercially reasonable efforts to complete the installation and rigging of the Perfexion within six (6) weeks (the “Down Period”) so as to minimize the interruption of Medical Center’s services to its patients. GKF will provide Medical Center with not less than sixty (60) days notice of the approximate dates of the Down Period so that Medical Center can appropriately manage patient scheduling.

 

3.2           Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Perfexion Upgrade shall be performed by GKF only after all licenses, permits, approvals, consents and authorizations necessary and appropriate for the Perfexion Upgrade, including, without limitation, the proper handling of the cobalt-60 (collectively, the "Permits"), have been obtained by Medical Center at Medical Center's sole cost and expense (other than any filing or registration fees which shall be paid for by GKF). The timing and procedure for such Perfexion Upgrade shall be as mutually agreed upon between the parties. Medical Center represents and warrants to GKF that the Site and shielding in the vault for the Perfexion are compliant with all applicable Nuclear Regulatory Commission and other federal and state requirements.

 

3.3           GKF confirms and warrants that the Perfexion fits into the existing footprint of the Model 4C, that there is no need for construction at the site (other than minor modifications to be made by GKF as needed), and that Medical Center’s site meets all requirements of the Site Planning Criteria, as that term is used in the purchase agreement between Elekta, Inc. and GKF; provided that, in so warranting, GKF relies upon the warranties and representations made by Medical Center under the Prior Lease and in this Agreement, including without limitation, Section 3.2 above (all of which representations and warranties shall survive and remain in full force and effect).       

 

3.4           Medical Center warrants that it shall utilize its best efforts to fulfill on an expeditious basis its obligations under this Section 3. Medical Center further warrants that it shall on a regular basis keep GKF informed of Medical Center's progress in fulfilling its obligations pursuant to this Section 3.

 

2
Exhibit 10.22b

 

3.5           Upon receipt of Elekta’s report on the results of the Acceptance Tests (as defined in the LGK Agreement), Medical Center shall have three (3) business days to review and validate the results of the Acceptance Tests to confirm that the Perfexion meets the manufacturer’s specifications and documentation. If Medical Center fails to respond within such three (3) business day period, Medical Center shall be deemed to have validated and confirmed the results of the Acceptance Tests.

 

3.6           It is understood by the parties that GKF is not responsible for any additional upgrades, hardware, cobalt reloading, software changes and/or other modifications to the Perfexion except as expressly set forth herein or otherwise agreed upon in writing by Medical Center and GKF.

 

3.7           Unless Medical Center notifies GKF at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the expiration of the Term that Medical Center wishes to further extend the Term of its Lease Agreement with GKF upon such terms as shall be mutually agreed upon in writing between the parties, GKF shall remove the Perfexion, at its sole expense, within ninety (90) days after the expiration of the Term.

 

3.8           Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, (i) GKF shall de-install, remove and retain all ownership rights and title to the existing Model 4C; (ii) GKF shall acquire and hold title to the Perfexion; and (iii) Medical Center shall have no ownership interest (or option to purchase any ownership interest) in the Model 4C and/or the Perfexion.

 

3.9           On the date on which the Model 4C is no longer operable due to the commencement of its de-installation (the “Early Termination Date”), the Prior Lease shall be terminated and of no further force and effect; provided, however, that those provisions of the Prior Lease that are expressly stated or intended to survive termination of the Prior Lease shall survive and remain applicable beyond the Early Termination Date.

 

4.           Additional Services of GKF .

 

4.1           GKF shall provide maintenance and service of the Equipment as needed for the term of this Agreement to keep the Equipment in a good state of repair, reasonable wear and tear excepted, including but not limited to providing a minimum of two PMI (Preventative Maintenance Inspections) per year and repair work as needed. GKF agrees to exercise due and proper care in the repair and maintenance of the Equipment. GKF shall have the right of access to the Equipment for the purpose of inspecting same at all reasonable times and upon reasonable notice. In the event the Equipment is improperly used by Medical Center or its employees, agents, officers and physicians, GKF may service or repair the same as needed and such expense shall be paid by Medical Center, unless the repair is covered by the Repair Service Agreement, if any, referenced in Section 17, below.

 

4.2           Use of the calibration phantom system by the Medical Center as requested by the Medical Center, based on availability.

 

3
Exhibit 10.22b

 

4.3           Training of Medical Center staff on the proper use of the Equipment (i) at the time of installation of the Perfexion and (ii) at the request of Medical Center for the term of this Agreement, such requests not to exceed more than one request annually;

 

4.4           Upon the termination of this Agreement, the de-installation and removal of the Perfexion, including any third party costs (but excluding Medical Center costs). Medical Center, at Medical Center's cost and expense, shall provide GKF with Medical Center personnel (including Medical Center physicists) and services upon request and as required by GKF to oversee, supervise and assist with such de-installation and removal.

 

5.          [Intentionally omitted.]

 

6.           Term of the Agreement . The initial term of this Agreement (the "Term") shall commence as of the Effective Date and, unless earlier terminated or extended in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, shall continue until the date that is six (6) years after the date on which the first procedure using the Perfexion is performed at the Site (the "First Procedure Date"). Medical Center's obligation to make the rental payments to GKF for the Equipment as described in Paragraph 7 below shall commence on the first day of the first full month after the Effective Date of this Agreement. The rental payments described in Paragraph 7 shall apply to the Model 4C until such time as it is upgrade to the Perfexion, and shall then continue to apply to the Perfexion for the duration of the Term of this Agreement.

 

7.           Per Procedure Payments . Medical Center shall pay to GKF the applicable per procedure payment as specified in Exhibit 2 for the use of the Equipment, subject to adjustment as set forth in Sections 7.1(a) and 7.1(b) below. A "procedure" shall be defined as a single patient treatment session using the Equipment provided by GKF pursuant to this Agreement, that may include one or more isocenters during that session. Medical Center shall be billed on the fifteenth (15th) and the last day of each month for the actual number of procedures performed during the first and second half of the month, respectively. Medical Center shall pay for the procedures invoiced within thirty (30) days after being invoiced.

 

  The parties acknowledge that the compensation payable by Medical Center for the Perfexion as set forth in this Agreement has been negotiated by the parties at arm’s length based upon reasonable and jointly derived assumptions regarding the capacity for clinical services available from the Perfexion, Medical Center’s capabilities in providing high quality radiation oncology services, market dynamics, GKF’s risk in providing the Perfexion, and the provision to GKF of a reasonable rate of return on its investment in support of the Perfexion. Based thereon, the parties believe that the rent payments represent fair market value for the use of the Perfexion, the de-installation and removal of the Model 4C, the Perfexion upgrade, maintenance and service, personal property taxes, cost of insurance coverage for the Perfexion, and any other additional services and costs to be provided or paid for by GKF pursuant to this Agreement. Medical Center undertakes no obligation to perform any minimum number of procedures on the Perfexion, and the use of the Perfexion for the performance of procedures is wholly based upon the independent judgment of physicians who order such procedures to meet the medical needs of their patients.

 

4
Exhibit 10.22b

 

(a)          If at any time or from time-to-time after the Effective Date, the Medical Center’s Commercial Rate with any "Designated Payor" (excluding those covered in 7(b) below), is increased or decreased such that the new Commercial Rate for such Designated Payor is greater or less than the "Base Commercial Rate" for that Designated Payor (or the then current Commercial Rate if the Non-Medicare Fee Per Procedure rates shown in Exhibit 2 for such Designated Payor have previously been revised pursuant to this subsection) by *, then, (1) Medical Center shall notify GKF thereof in writing (but without disclosing the identity of the Designated Payor) within thirty (30) days of any such increase or decrease and shall provide GKF with reasonably sufficient documentation evidencing the revised Commercial Rate for that Designated Payor (and the amount of the increase or decrease), including, without limitation, copies of the applicable contractual language or fee schedule (with the identity of the Designated Payor redacted), and any remittance advices, EOBs or other documentation showing the payments made to Medical Center by such Designated Payor immediately before and after the subject increase or decrease to its Commercial Rate, it being understood that such documentation may become available following the effective date of such increase or decrease and that Medical Center shall provide such documentation to GKF as and when available; (2) effective in the next billing cycle after said notification (provided that such increase or decrease to the Commercial Rate is then effective), the fee for procedures performed on patients who are assigned to or enrolled with such Designated Payor shall be equal to the Non-Medicare Fee Per Procedure rates as shown in Exhibit 2 (or the then current Non-Medicare Fee Per Procedure rates for such Designated Payor if said Non-Medicare Fee Per Procedure rates have previously been revised pursuant to this subsection), increased or decreased therein by * of the dollar-for-dollar increase or decrease to the Commercial Rate for that Designated Payor; and (3) the Non-Medicare Fee Per Procedure rates set forth in Exhibit 2 for all other Designated Payors shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. For example, if a Designated Payor’s Commercial Rate decreases by * from the Base Commercial Rate (which, for purposes of this example, is assumed to exceed the * threshold above), then, each Non-Medicare Fee Per Procedure rate shown in Exhibit 2 for that Designated Payor shall be decreased by *.

 

(b)          If at any time or from time-to-time after the Effective Date, the "Medicare Rate" is increased or decreased such that the new Medicare Rate is greater or less than the "Base Medicare Rate" (or the then current Medicare rate if the Medicare Fee Per Procedure rates shown in Exhibit 2 have previously been revised pursuant to this subsection) by * or more, then, (1) Medical Center shall notify GKF thereof in writing within thirty (30) days of any such increase or decrease and shall provide GKF

 

(c)          with reasonably sufficient documentation evidencing the revised Medicare Rate (and the amount of the increase or decrease), including, without limitation, copies of the applicable contractual language or fee schedule (with the identity of the Designated Payor redacted), and any remittance advices, EOBs or other documentation showing the payments made to Medical Center immediately before and after the subject increase or decrease to its Medicare Rate, it being understood that such documentation may become available following the effective date of such increase or decrease and that Medical Center shall provide such documentation to GKF as and when available; (2) effective in the next billing cycle after said notification (provided that such increase or decrease to the revised Medicare Rate is then effective), the fee for procedures performed on Medicare patients shall be equal to the Medicare Fee Per Procedure rates as shown in Exhibit 2 (or the then current Medicare Fee Per Procedure rates if said Medicare Fee Per Procedure rates have previously been revised pursuant to this subsection), increased or decreased therein by * of the dollar-for-dollar increase or decrease to the Medicare Rate. For example, if the Medicare Rate increases by * over the Base Medicare Rate (which, for purposes of this example, is assumed to exceed the * threshold above), then, each Medicare Fee Per Procedure rate shown in Exhibit 2 shall be increased by *.

 

5
Exhibit 10.22b

 

(d)          Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, and in addition to GKF's termination rights set forth in Section 18 below, GKF shall have the right in its sole and absolute discretion to terminate this Agreement upon ninety (90) days prior written notice to Medical Center if, as a result of any actual or impending decrease to the Commercial Rates and/or the Medicare Rates, GKF projects that the sum of all per procedure payments made by Medical Center to GKF under this Agreement during the next succeeding twelve (12) month period will fall short of * in the aggregate.

 

(e)          As used herein:

 

(i)          " Base Commercial Rate " shall mean the Medical Center’s Commercial Rate for the applicable Designated Payor (excluding Medicare) as of the Effective Date of this Agreement.

 

(ii)         " Base Medicare Rate " shall mean the Medical Center’s Medicare Rate as of the Effective Date of the Agreement.

 

(iii)        " Commercial Rate " shall mean Medical Center's contracted reimbursement rate then in effect with a Designated Payor for the technical component of all services (including, but not limited to, treatment planning and delivery, but excluding codes specifically related to physics support) related to a procedure performed on the Equipment, including, without limitation, all adjustments and other amounts payable to, or entitled to be collected by, Medical Center or its representatives or affiliates from such Designated Payor.

 

(iv)        " Designated Payor " shall mean the payors listed on Exhibit 3 attached hereto.

 

(v)         " Medicare Rate " shall mean the aggregate Medicare fee-for-service reimbursement rate for the technical component of all services (including, but not limited to, treatment planning and delivery, but excluding codes specifically related to physics support) related to a procedure performed on the Equipment using CPT code 77371, defined as Stereotactic Radiosurgery Gamma, or any substitutions, replacements and/or supplements thereto (or, if no longer in effect, their respective outpatient rate replacements for Gamma Knife procedures), taking into account, without limitation, any and all new codes, repeals, modifications, changes in interpretation and other adjusting factors, which reimbursement rates are payable to, or entitled to be collected by, Medical Center or its representatives or affiliates from any and all Medicare-related payor sources, including, without limitation, carriers, fiscal intermediaries and any other Medicare-related third party payors. Medical Center represents and warrants to GKF that the difference between the Medicare Rate in effect immediately prior to the Effective Date and the Medicare Rate in effect as of the Effective Date is approximately $4,600.

 

6
Exhibit 10.22b

 

8.           Use of the Equipment . The Equipment may be used by Medical Center only at the Site and shall not be removed therefrom. Medical Center shall not assign or sublease the Equipment or its rights hereunder without the prior written consent of GKF; which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. No permitted assignment or sublease shall relieve Medical Center of any of its obligations hereunder. Medical Center shall not use nor permit the Equipment to be used in any manner nor for any purpose for which, in the reasonable opinion of Elekta or GKF based on current medical practice, the Equipment is not designed or reasonably suitable. Medical Center shall not permit any liens, whether voluntary or involuntary, to attach to the Equipment, without the prior written consent of GKF. Medical Center shall have no interest in the Equipment other than the rights acquired as a lessee hereunder and the Equipment shall remain the property of GKF regardless of the manner in which it may be installed or attached at the Site. Medical Center shall, at GKF's request, affix to the Equipment tags, decals, or plates furnished by GKF, indicating GKF's ownership of the Equipment.

 

9.           Additional Covenants of Medical Center . In addition to the other covenants made by Medical Center, Medical Center shall at its own cost and expense:

 

9.1           Provide properly trained professional, technical and support personnel and supplies required for the timely scheduling and treatment of patients utilizing the Equipment.

 

9.2           Assume all medical and financial responsibility for the overseers' monitoring of all patients' medical condition and treatment.

 

9.3           Fully comply with all of its obligations under the LGK Agreement that affect the operation of the Equipment and/or that affect this Agreement.

 

9.4           Upon request by GKF and at GKF’s reasonable expense, Medical Center shall execute and deliver a commercially reasonable form of consent to sublease, subordination or other documentation if such a document is reasonably requested by the third party financing company which holds a security interest in the Perfexion.

 

10.          Additional Covenants. Representations and Warranties of GKF . In addition to the other covenants, representations and warranties, made by GKF in this Agreement:

 

10.1         GKF represents and warrants that GKF has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement, and that this Agreement does not and will not violate any agreement, contract or instrument binding upon GKF.

 

10.2         GKF represents and warrants to Medical Center that, upon delivery of the Equipment to Medical Center, GKF shall use its best faith efforts to require that Elekta meets its contractual obligations to GKF and puts the Equipment, as soon as possible, into good, safe and serviceable condition and fit for its intended use in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications, guidelines and field modification instructions.

 

7
Exhibit 10.22b

 

10.3         GKF represents and warrants that throughout the term of this Agreement, Medical Center shall enjoy the use of the Equipment, free of the rights of any other persons except for those rights reserved by GKF under this Agreement or granted to Elekta under the LGK Agreement.

 

11.          Indemnification .

 

11.1         Each party shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other party, and such other party’s directors, officers, employees, agents and affiliates, from and against any and all claims, actions, liabilities, costs and expenses (including without limitation judgment and settlement costs, court costs and attorneys’ fees) arising out of or relating to negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the indemnifying party or any failure by the indemnifying party to perform any obligation or covenant of the indemnifying party in this Agreement

 

11.2         Medical Center shall further indemnify GKF for any damage to the Equipment to the extent such damage is caused by the negligent or willfully wrongful acts or omissions of Medical Center or its agents, officers, physicians and employees and are not covered and reimbursed by GKF’s insurance. In the event the Equipment is destroyed or rendered unusable as a result of such negligent or willfully wrongful acts or omissions, this indemnification shall extend up to (but not exceed) the full replacement value of the Equipment at the time of its destruction less salvage value, if any.

 

11.3         GKF shall further indemnify Medical Center in the event that Medical Center suffers any loss, damage, claim or expense solely as the result of GKF’s breach of its obligations under Section 17, below.

 

12.          Ownership/Title . It is expressly understood that Medical Center shall acquire no right, title or interest in or to the Equipment, other than the right to the possession and use of the same in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

 

GKF may at its sole discretion finance the Equipment. Financing may be in the form of an installment loan or a capitalized lease or other commercially available debt instrument. Should GKF finance the Equipment through an installment loan, GKF shall be required to provide the Equipment as collateral against the loan. Should GKF finance the Equipment through a capitalized lease title shall vest with the lessor until GKF exercises its buy-out option. In addition, should GKF finance the Equipment, said agreement may be used as collateral against the loan. No financing by GKF will relieve GKF of its obligations to Medical Center or materially change Medical Center's duties or materially increase the burdens or risks imposed on Medical Center. Medical Center's interest under this Agreement shall be subject and subordinate to the interests of the Lender, which Medical Center shall promptly confirm in writing on Lender's form, if requested by GKF.

 

13.          Cost of Use of the Equipment . Except as is otherwise provided herein, Medical Center shall bear the entire cost of using the Equipment during the Term of this Agreement. This shall include, but not be limited to, providing trained professionals, technical and support personnel and supplies to properly operate the Equipment. Medical Center shall be fully responsible and liable for all acts and/or omissions of such professional, technical and support personnel.

 

8
Exhibit 10.22b

 

14.          Taxes . GKF shall pay any personal property taxes levied against the Equipment and any other taxes or governmental fees or assessments, however denoted, whether of the federal government, any state government or any local government, levied or based on this Agreement or the use of the Equipment except for those taxes, if any, pertaining to the gross income or gross receipts of Medical Center.

 

15.         [Intentionally omitted.]

 

16.         [Intentionally omitted.]

 

17.          Repair Service Agreement . GKF may at its discretion enter into a Repair Service Agreement with Elekta. If GKF has entered into a Repair Service Agreement with Elekta, (a) GKF agrees to fulfill all of its obligations under the Repair Service Agreement and acknowledges that Medical Center is a third party beneficiary of the Repair Service Agreement; (b) GKF will reasonably pursue any and all remedies it may have against Elekta under the Repair Service Agreement, if any, to insure that the Equipment will be in conformity with Elekta's warranties so that it is free from defects in design, materials, workmanship or manufacture which result in noncompliance with the Specifications and/or Elekta's warranties to GKF; provided that, for the avoidance of doubt, none of the foregoing obligations in this Section shall be binding upon GKF if GKF has not entered into a Repair Service Agreement with Elekta.

 

18.          Termination . If, after the initial twenty-four (24) month period following the First Procedure Date or any subsequent 12 month period, the sum of all per procedure payments made by Medical Center to GKF under this Agreement during the most recent twelve (12) month period fell short of *, then and in that event, GKF shall have the option (but not the obligation) of terminating this Agreement upon the giving of written notice to Medical Center of said termination not less than one hundred and eighty (180) days prior to GKF's designated termination date. GKF shall remove the Equipment, at its sole expense, within ninety (90) days after the designated termination date, unless Medical Center notifies GKF within ninety (90) days following receipt of GKF's notice of termination that it wishes to purchase the Equipment in cash at a price to be mutually agreed upon by the parties.

 

19.          Option to Extend Agreement .

 

19.1         At the end of the initial Term, Medical Center shall have the option to:

 

(a)          Renegotiate this Agreement for a five year renewal term, or

 

(b)          Terminate this Agreement. If Medical Center terminates this Agreement at the end of the initial Term, Medical Center shall have the option to purchase the Equipment in cash at a price to be mutually agreed upon by the parties. Medical Center shall exercise such option by giving written notice to GKF not less than ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the initial Term. If Medical Center does not issue such notice, Medical Center shall be deemed to have elected not to exercise such option, and GKF shall remove the Equipment, at its sole cost and expense, within ninety (90) days after the expiration of the initial Term.

 

9
Exhibit 10.22b

 

Medical Center shall exercise one (1) of the two (2) options referred to above by mailing an irrevocable written notice thereof to GKF at Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3700, San Francisco, California, 94111, by registered mail, postmarked on or before the end of the year immediately preceding the expiration of the initial Term of this Agreement. Any such notice shall be sufficient if it states in substance that Medical Center elects to exercise its option and states which of the two (2) options referred to above Medical Center is exercising.

 

20.          No Warranties by GKF with Respect to the Equipment . GKF SUPPLIES THE EQUIPMENT "AS IS" AND NOT BEING THE MANUFACTURER OF THE EQUIPMENT OR THE MANUFACTURER'S AGENT, MAKES NO WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE EQUIPMENT'S MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, DESIGN, CONDITION, DURABILITY, CAPACITY, MATERIAL OR WORKMANSHIP OR AS TO PATENT INFRINGEMENT OR THE LIKE, it being agreed that all such risks as between GKF and Medical Center, shall be borne by Medical Center. Medical Center agrees to look solely to the manufacturer (Elekta) or to suppliers of the Equipment (and its software) for any and all warranty claims with respect to the Equipment. Any and all warranties made by Elekta to GKF will be in its good faith best efforts enforced by GKF on behalf of Medical Center during the initial Term hereof and any renewal Terms. Medical Center agrees that GKF shall not be responsible for the operation of the Equipment. GKF shall not be responsible for any direct or indirect consequential loss or damage resulting from the installation, operation or use of the Equipment or otherwise. Medical Center expressly waives any right to hold GKF liable hereunder for any claims, demands and liabilities arising out of or in connection with the design, manufacture, possession or operation of the Equipment.

 

21.          Events of Default by Medical Center and Remedies . The occurrence of any one of the following shall constitute an Event of Default by Medical Center hereunder:

 

(a)          Medical Center fails to pay any installment of semi-monthly procedure payments when due when such default continues for a period of thirty (30) days after notice thereof from GKF or its assignee is given to Medical Center;

 

(b)          Medical Center attempts to remove, sell, transfer, encumber, sublet or part with possession of the Equipment or any items thereof, except as expressly permitted herein;

 

(c)          Medical Center shall fail to observe or perform any of the other obligations required to be observed or performed by Medical Center hereunder and such failure shall continue uncured for sixty (60) days after written notice thereof to Medical Center by GKF;

 

(d)          Medical Center ceases doing business as a going concern, makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, admits in writing its inability to pay its debts as they become due, files a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, is adjudicated a bankrupt or an insolvent, files a petition seeking for itself any reorganization, arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution or similar arrangement under any present or future statute, law or regulation or files an answer admitting the material allegations of a petition filed against it in any such proceeding, consents to or acquiesces in the appointment of a trustee, receiver, or liquidator of it or of all or any substantial part of its assets or properties, or it or its shareholders shall take any action looking to its dissolution or liquidation.

 

10
Exhibit 10.22b

 

(e)          Within sixty (60) days after the commencement of any proceedings against Medical Center seeking reorganization, arrangement, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution or similar relief under any present or future statute, law or regulation, such proceedings shall not have been dismissed, or if within thirty (30) days after the appointment without Medical Center's consent or acquiescence of any trustee, receiver or liquidator of it or of all or any substantial part of its assets and properties, such appointment shall not be vacated.

 

Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default by Medical Center, GKF may at its option do any or all of the following: (i) by written notice to Medical Center, terminate this Agreement as to the Equipment in default, wherever situated, and for such purposes, enter upon the Site without liability for so doing or GKF may cause Medical Center and Medical Center hereby agrees to return the Equipment to GKF at Medical Center's sole cost and expense; and (ii) sell, dispose of, hold, use or lease the Equipment in default, as GKF in its sole discretion may determine (and GKF shall not be obligated to give preference to the sale, lease or other disposition of the Equipment over the sale, lease or other disposition of similar Equipment owned or leased by GKF). In any event, Medical Center shall, without further demand, pay to GKF an amount equal to all sums due and payable for all periods up to and including the date on which GKF had declared this Agreement to be in default.

 

Medical Center agrees that GKF shall have no obligation to sell the Equipment. Medical Center shall in any event remain fully liable for reasonable damages as provided by law for all costs and expenses incurred by GKF on account of such default, including but not limited to, all court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. The rights afforded GKF hereunder shall not be deemed to be exclusive, but shall be in addition to any other rights or remedies provided by law.

 

22.          Events of Default by GKF and Remedies . The occurrence of any one of the following shall constitute an Event of Default by GKF hereunder:

 

(a)          GKF shall fail to observe or perform any of the obligations required to be observed or performed by GKF hereunder and such failure shall continue uncured for sixty (60) days after written notice thereof to GKF by Medical Center;

 

(b)          GKF ceases doing business as a going concern, makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, admits in writing its inability to pay its debts as they become due, files a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, is adjudicated a bankrupt or an insolvent, files a petition seeking for itself any reorganization, arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution or similar arrangement under any present or future statute, law or regulation or files an answer admitting the material allegations of a petition filed against it in any such proceeding, consents to or acquiesces in the appointment of a trustee, receiver, or liquidator of it or of all or any substantial part of its assets or properties, or it or its shareholders shall take any action looking to its dissolution or liquidation.

 

11
Exhibit 10.22b

 

(c)          Within sixty (60) days after the commencement of any proceedings against GKF seeking reorganization, arrangement, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution or similar relief under any present or future statute, law or regulation, such proceedings shall not have been dismissed, or if within thirty (30) days after the appointment without GKF's consent or acquiescence of any trustee, receiver or liquidator of it or of all or any substantial part of its assets and properties, such appointment shall not be vacated.

 

Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default by GKF, Medical Center may at its option do any or all of the following: (i) by written notice to GKF, terminate this Agreement and, in such event, GKF shall remove the Equipment at GKF's sole cost and expense or, in the absence of removal by GKF within ninety (90) days after a written request therefor, Medical Center may remove the Equipment with all due care and store the Equipment at GKF's sole cost and expense, or (ii) purchase the Equipment in cash at a price to be mutually agreed upon by the parties.

 

GKF shall in any event remain fully liable for reasonable damages as provided by law for all costs and expenses incurred by Medical Center on account of such default, including but not limited to all court costs and reasonable attorney's fees. The rights afforded Medical Center hereunder shall not be deemed to be exclusive, but shall be in addition to any other rights or remedies provided by law.

 

23.           Insurance .

 

23.1         During the Term of this Agreement (and any successive terms) GKF shall, at its own cost and expense, keep in effect an all risk and hazard insurance policy covering the Equipment. The all risk and hazard insurance policy shall be for an amount not less than the replacement cost of the Equipment. During the Term of this Agreement, Medical Center shall, at its own cost and expense, keep in effect public liability and professional liability insurance policies concerning the operation of the Equipment by Medical Center. Said policies shall be in the amounts of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $5,000,000 in aggregate per year. Medical Center and GKF, their successors and assigns, shall be named as additional insureds and/or loss payees on the insurance policies maintained hereunder by the other party. Evidence of such insurance coverages shall be furnished by both parties to the other party upon written request, by no later than the Delivery Date.

 

23.2         If the Equipment is rendered unusable as a result of any physical damage to, or destruction of, the Equipment, Medical Center shall give to GKF immediate notice. GKF shall determine, within thirty (30) days after the date of occurrence of such damage or destruction, whether the Equipment can be repaired. In the event GKF determines that the Equipment cannot be repaired, GKF at its sole cost and expense shall promptly replace the Equipment subject to availability and subject, further, to Medical Center's obligations under Section 11.2 above. This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect as though such damage or destruction had not occurred. In the event GKF determines that the Equipment can be repaired, GKF shall cause the Equipment to be promptly repaired at its sole expense, subject, however, to Medical Center's obligations under Section 4.1 above.

 

24.          Notices . Any notices required under this Agreement shall be sent in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered by hand or mailed by certified or registered mail to the following addresses:

 

12
Exhibit 10.22b

 

To GKF:    GK Financing, LLC

Craig K. Tagawa, C.E.O.

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3700

San Francisco, CA 94111

 

To Medical Center:   Tufts Medical Center, Inc.

750 Washington Street

NEMC 428

Boston, MA 02111

 

Or to such other addresses as either party may specify for the reception of notice from time to time in writing to the other party.

 

25.          Integration/Supersedure . This Agreement contains the full and entire Agreement between the parties hereto, and no oral or written understanding is of any force or effect whatsoever unless expressly contained in a writing executed subsequent to the date of this Agreement.

 

26.          Waivers . To the extent that either party fails or chooses not to pursue any of its remedies under this Agreement or pursuant to applicable law, such shall not prejudice such party's rights to pursue any of those remedies at any future time and shall not constitute a waiver of such party's rights.

 

27.          Assignments . This Agreement is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the permitted successors or assigns of the respective parties hereto, except that neither party may assign its rights or obligations under this Agreement without the express written consent of the other (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed).

 

28.          Amendments . This Agreement shall not be amended or altered in any manner unless such amendment or alteration is in a writing signed by both parties.

 

29.          Record-Keeping Requirements .

 

29.1         Medical Center and GKF shall generate such records and make such disclosures as may be required, from time to time, by the Medicare, Medicaid and other third party payment programs with respect to this Agreement in order to meet all requirements for participation and payment associated with such programs, including but not limited to the matters covered by Section 1861(v)(1)(I) of the Social Security Act.

 

29.2         For the purpose of compliance with Section 1861(v)(1)(I) of the Social Security Act, as amended, and any regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, both parties agree to comply with the following statutory requirements (a) until the expiration of four (4) years after the termination of this Agreement, both parties shall make available, upon written request to the Secretary of Health and Human Services or, upon request, to the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, the contract, and books, documents and records of such party that are necessary to certify the nature and extent of such costs, and (b) if either party carries out any of the duties of the contract through a subcontract with a value or cost of $10,000 or more over a twelve month period, with a related organization, such subcontract shall contain a clause to the effect that until the expiration of four (4) years after the furnishing of such services pursuant to such subcontract, the related organization shall make available, upon written request to the Secretary, or upon request to the Comptroller General, or any of their duly authorized representatives the subcontract, and books, documents and records of such organization that are necessary to verify the nature and extent of such costs.

 

13
Exhibit 10.22b

 

30.          Supplier and Owner of Perfexion . The parties hereto agree that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, the Lease is and shall be treated and interpreted as a "finance lease," as such term is defined in Article 2A of the Uniform Commercial Code, that GKF shall be treated as a finance lessor who is entitled to the benefits and releases from liability accorded to a finance lessor under Article 2A of the Uniform Commercial Code. In furtherance of the foregoing, Medical Center acknowledges that, before signing this Agreement, GKF has informed Medical Center in writing (a) that Elekta is the entity supplying the Perfexion, (b) that Medical Center is entitled (under Section 2A of the Uniform Commercial Code) to the promises and warranties, including those of any third party, provided to GKF by Elekta which is the entity supplying the goods in connection with or as part of the contract by which GKF acquired the Perfexion or the right to possession and use of the Perfexion, and (c) that Medical Center may communicate with Elekta and receive an accurate and complete statement of those promises and warranties, including any disclaimers and limitations of them or of remedies. Medical Center also acknowledges that Medical Center has selected Elekta to supply the Perfexion and has directed GKF to acquire the Perfexion or the right to possession and use of the Perfexion from Elekta. Nothing herein shall be construed to limit GKF’s obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement.

 

31.          Miscellaneous Provisions .

 

31.1         The invalidity or unenforceability of any portion or provision of this Agreement shall not effect the validity or enforceability of any other portion, nor shall either party's implied or express consent to the breach or waiver of any provision of this Agreement constitute a waiver of such provision as to any subsequent breach.

 

31.2         In the event of any claim or controversy arising hereunder, the prevailing party in such claim or controversy shall be entitled to a reasonable attorneys' fee in addition to whatever other relief said party would be otherwise entitled.

 

31.3          Force Majeure . Failure to perform by either party will be excused in the event of any delay or inability to perform its duties under this Agreement directly or indirectly caused by conditions beyond its reasonable control including without limitation, fires, floods, earthquakes, snow, ice, disasters, Acts of God, accidents, riots, wars, operation of law, strikes, governmental action or regulations, shortages of labor, fuel, power, materials, manufacturer delays or transportation problems.

 

31.4         This Agreement may be executed in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but all of which counterparts shall together constitute the same instrument. The captions and paragraph headings used herein are for convenience only and shall not be used in construing or interpreting this Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the full and complete agreement and understanding between the parties hereto concerning the subject matter hereof and shall supersede any and all prior written and oral agreements with regard to such subject matter.

 

14
Exhibit 10.22b

 

31.5         Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, nothing set forth in this Agreement shall limit, impair or otherwise affect the respective rights, obligations and remedies of the parties under the Prior Lease, provided however that the pricing terms of the Prior Lease shall be replaced by Section 7 and Exhibit 2 of this Agreement, and provided further that, subject to Section 3.9 above, the Prior Lease shall terminate on the date of the de-installation of the Model 4C.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement on the day and year first above written.

 

GKF : Medical Center :
   
GK FINANCING, LLC TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
       
By: /s/ Ernest A. Bates, MD By: /s/ Okey Agba
Name: Ernest A. Bates, MD Name: Okey Agba
Title: Policy Committee Member Title: Chief Financial Officer

 

15
Exhibit 10.22b

 

Exhibit 1

 

LGK AGREEMENT

 

16
Exhibit 10.22b

 

Leksell Gamma Knife®

End User Agreement

 

 

Prepared for

 

TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER

750 WASHINGTON ST STE 1012
BOSTON, MA 02111-1526

 

JUNE 28, 2012

 

17
Exhibit 10.22b

 

LEKSELL GAMMA KNIFE® END USER AGREEMENT

 

 

THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the 1st day of July, 2012 by and between ELEKTA, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Georgia (hereinafter referred to as “Elekta”), and Tufts Medical Center,. (hereinafter referred to as “End User”).

 

WITNESSETH:

 

WHEREAS, Elekta has agreed to sell the “Leksell Gamma Knife®” system (hereinafter defined and referred to as the “LGK®”) to GK Financing, LLC.. hereinafter referred to as “Buyer”), and

 

WHEREAS, Buyer has agreed to lease the LGK® to End User under separate agreement.

 

WHEREAS, Elekta and End User wish to enter this Agreement for their mutual benefit;

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations, warranties and indemnities herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

ARTICLE I. DEFINED TERMS.

 

The following words and terms shall have the meanings set forth opposite them in this Article I:

 

Acceptance Tests are those tests which demonstrate that the LGK® meets the manufacturer’s specification and which are defined in the Purchase Agreement between Buyer and Elekta.

 

Charging means all handling of the Cobalt Supply at the Site and the installation of such Cobalt Supply in the LGK®.

 

Cobalt Supply means the supply of the Cobalt-60 sources to be installed in the LGK®.

 

Effective Date is the date of execution of this Agreement by the End User, as indicated in this Agreement.

 

Hardware shall mean that computer hardware and related equipment described in the Specification.

 

Lease Agreement shall mean the Agreement between Buyer and End User pursuant to which Buyer shall lease the LGK® to End User.

 

LGK® is the device, which is technically specified in Exhibit A hereto, to be sold, delivered, and installed by Elekta at the Site.

 

LGP Software means the dose planning software for the LGK®, which is described in the Specification.

 

Site shall mean that location described on the Exhibit B hereto.

 

Site Planning Criteria are the requirements which the Site must meet to properly accommodate the LGK® and are defined in the Purchase Agreement between Elekta and Buyer.

 

Specification refers to the technical standards with which the LGK® shall comply, as described in Exhibit A hereto.

 

ARTICLE II. PERMITS

 

2.1            Permits . End User shall obtain any license (the “User License”) from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (or relevant state agency if the Site is located in an “Agreement State”) authorizing it to take possession of the Cobalt Supply and shall obtain such other licenses, permits, approvals, consents and authorizations which may be required by local governmental or other regulatory agencies for the Site, its preparation, the charging of the LGK® with its Cobalt Supply, the conduct of Acceptance Tests, and the use of the LGK®. End User shall not run, operate, or otherwise use the LGK®, except for the purpose of conducting the Acceptance Tests, until the Acceptance Tests have been successfully completed.

 

ARTICLE III. OPERATION AND TRAINING.

 

3.1            Operation. End User warrants and covenants that the LGK® shall not be run, operated or otherwise used, except by and to qualified employees or physicians, who are suitably skilled and experienced to use the LGK®.

 

3.2            Technical Training. Elekta shall provide to four (4) persons on the End User’s staff instruction relating to the technical operation and maintenance of the LGK. Such instruction shall not exceed two consecutive days and will be provided on site by installation personnel at the time of install.

 

3.3            Introductory Clinical Training. Introductory Clinical Training Program. Indications, Technique, Literature, etc. Length of training is 5 consecutive days. Up to four (4) training spaces included (Tuition only). May be substituted for Technical/Applications training course at Elekta Sweden as noted on Exhibit A.

 

3.4            Post Clinical Start Up Site Visit . Elekta shall provide a one-day site visit from one Clinical Applications representative. The visit must be arranged within 3-6 months post clinical start up. The commitment will expire thereafter unless documented alternate arrangements are made. The purpose is to ensure the customer is comfortable using all features in the Leksell GammaPlan® PFXTM software.

 

3.5            LGK® Software . Elekta hereby consents to Buyer’s sublicense to End User of the LGK® Software, to be utilized only for the purpose of planning dosages of treatments to be performed with the LGK®. A copy of the LGK® Software License from Elekta to Buyer is attached hereto as Exhibit D End User agrees that its sublicense to the LGK® Software shall be subject to the terms and conditions of Exhibit D hereto. End User agrees, in favor of Elekta, to perform the obligations assigned to Buyer in Exhibit D hereto. In the event the sublicense of the LGK® Software from Buyer to End User is terminated due to an act or omission of Buyer and without fault of the End User, then End User shall have the right to obtain from Elekta a direct royalty-free license to utilize the LGK® Software on the terms and conditions described in Exhibit D hereto.

 

18
Exhibit 10.22b

 

3.6.           Intellectual Property .

 

(a)          End User hereby acknowledges that the trademarks Gamma Knife® and Leksell Gamma Knife® (collectively, the “Mark”) are protected by United States federal registrations and the Mark constitutes valuable intellectual property of an affiliate of Elekta in which it has established substantial goodwill. End User hereby acknowledges that proper use of the Mark in any advertising of End User’s own surgical services performed with the LGK® surgical instrument is highly important to maintaining such value and goodwill.

 

(b)          Subject to the terms and conditions of this section, Elekta, as agent for Elekta Instrument, S.A. of Geneva, Switzerland, the owner of the Mark, hereby grants End-User a non-exclusive, royalty-free license without right to sublicense solely for the purpose of using the Mark in connection with the promotion and advertising of any of End User’s own services to be performed by use of the LGK® surgical instrument.

 

(c)          End User, in the conduct of End User’s business, is strictly prohibited from using the Mark in or as its official legal name. However, End User may use the trademark as part of the following fictitious trade name:

 

“Gamma Knife® Center of Tufts Medical Center”

 

As long as End User utilizes a fictitious trade name which includes the Mark, End User shall not perform radiosurgical services with any equipment other than the LGK®. If End User performs any radiosurgical service with any equipment other than the LGK® or if End User ceases to perform radiosurgical services with the LGK®, End User shall immediately cease utilizing the Mark as part of its fictitious trade name. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and for the avoidance of doubt, End User shall be entitled to use the Elekta Axesse system to perform radiological services at Tufts Medical Center.

 

(d)          In advertising, references to the Mark must include the registration symbol ® and such symbol must be used at least once per piece of advertising material along with the words “Gamma Knife® and Leksell Gamma Knife® are U.S. federally registered trademarks of Elekta Instrument S.A.., Geneva, Switzerland” somewhere in the advertisement. Elekta reserves the right to require End User to discontinue the use of advertising that does not conform to such requirements.

 

(e)          End User may use the words “Gamma Knife® Center of [ add distinctive name ]” as part of any internet domain name, or URL, telephone number or other communications address or symbol provided that the full name, “Gamma Knife® Center of [ add distinctive name ]” is used. User may use a variation or abbreviation of such term only after obtaining Elekta’s prior written consent to the proposed use in question. User may not under any circumstances, use the words “gamma Knife® ” alone, for any internet domain name, or URL, telephone number or other communications address or symbol.

 

(f)          All advertising or promotional materials in which the mark is utilized shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations as well as the standards of proper advertising.

 

(g)          Elekta shall have the right to terminate the license granted in this section with immediate effect if End User violates any provision of this section or utilizes the Mark in any manner which, in the sole opinion of Elekta, presents a reasonable possibility of damage to the Mark.

 

(h)          Upon termination of the license granted by this section, End User shall immediately cease all use of the mark, including, but not limited to, the use permitted under subsection (e) of this section.

 

(i)          Buyer acknowledges that a breach of any of its covenants or agreements hereunder will cause immediate and irreparable harm to Elekta and Elekta Instrument S.A. End User acknowledges and agrees that no adequate remedy at law exists for any such breach, and End User agrees that in the event of such a breach Elekta shall be entitled to injunctive relief and such other relief as any court with jurisdiction may deem just and proper.

 

ARTICLE IV. CONFIDENTIALITY

 

4.1           End User shall treat and maintain as confidential all technical information and know-how to it pursuant to this Agreement (including LGK® Software), except for know-how specifically designated as non-confidential pursuant to this Agreement or otherwise so designated by the Elekta. End User shall not disclose any aspect of such know-how (including the LGK® Software) to any other Person, including any corporation or governmental or quasi-governmental agency; provided that, End User shall have the right to disclose such know-how to its employees and resident physicians to the extent necessary for use of the LGK®, but End User shall be responsible to ensure that such know-how is not disclosed by such persons.

 

4.2           The provisions of this Article IV shall survive the termination of this Agreement and shall apply with equal force to any technical information or know-how concerning the LGK® acquired by End User other than pursuant to this Agreement.

 

4.4           The obligations of confidentiality and restriction of access pursuant to this Article IV shall not apply to any trade secret or confidential information that was (a) in the public domain at the time of such access or subsequently came in to the public domain through no fault of the Person subject to the provisions of Article IV; (b) rightfully known to the Person given such access prior to such access or developed independently by the Person given such access; (c) received by the Person given such access as a matter of right from a source other than a Person subject to the provisions of this Article IV; or (d) required to be disclosed by subpoena or court order, but Buyer shall give immediate notice of such subpoena or court order to Elekta and shall request the court to grant confidential treatment to the confidential information disclosed pursuant to such subpoena or court order.

 

ARTICLE V. WARRANTY AND REPAIR SERVICE AGREEMENT

 

5.1           Elekta provides the warranty for the LGK® set forth in Exhibit C hereto.

 

ARTICLE VI. EXCUSABLE DELAYS

 

If the performance of this Agreement by Elekta or Buyer or any obligation of Elekta or Buyer hereunder is prevented, restricted or interfered with by reason of fire, explosion, acts of God, labor disputes or accidents affecting performance under this Agreement, or war, mobilization, civil commotions, blockade or embargo, or any law, regulation, ordinance or requirement of any government or regulatory agency, or any other act whatsoever similar to those above enumerated, or any other circumstance being beyond the reasonable control of Elekta or Buyer, then and in that event Elekta or Buyer, as the case may be, shall promptly notify the other parties hereto of the resulting difficulties therefrom, and any of the foregoing events shall excuse any performance required under this Agreement.

 

19
Exhibit 10.22b

 

ARTICLE VII. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY; INDEMNIFICATION.

 

7.1           The exclusive remedies of End User and Elekta’s sole liabilities for breaches of this Agreement shall be limited to those specifically provided for in Section 5.1 (and Exhibit E hereto) and in this Article VII. In no event shall Elekta be liable to End User for loss of use, revenue or profit, or for any other direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damage, whether arising in contract or tort.

 

7.2           Elekta shall defend and indemnify End User and its Affiliates, agents, servants and employees, and hold them harmless from and against all damages, claims, judgments and liabilities by or to third parties (plus litigation costs incurred) resulting from injury to or death of any person or physical loss or damage to property arising out of defective materials, workmanship, or manufacture of the LGK® or the defective maintenance of the LGK® (but, with respect to maintenance, only to the extent performed by or on behalf of Elekta).

 

7.3           End User shall defend and indemnify Elekta and its Affiliates, agents, servants, and employees and hold them harmless from and against all damages, claims, judgments and liabilities by or to third parties (plus litigation costs incurred) resulting from injury to or death of any person or physical loss or damage to property arising out of the operation or medical use or misuse of the LGK® by or for End User (but which is not attributable to defective materials, workmanship or manufacture of the LGK®), the defective maintenance of the LGK® by or for End User (but only to the extent not performed by or on behalf of the Elekta), the failure of the Site to comply with the Site Planning Criteria, or the training provided by Elekta.

 

ARTICLE VIII. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

 

8.1            Assignment. No party hereto shall assign its respective rights or obligations under this Agreement (including the LGP Software License) in whole or in part to any person without the prior written consent of the other party, except as provided in this Section 8.2 hereinafter. In the event of any assignment or transfer by End User of its rights or duties under this Agreement or the Lease or of any sale, transfer, lease or sublease of the LGK® or any component thereof to a third party, End User shall obtain the prior approval of Elekta of the proposed transferee (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld) and cause such transferee, prior to such transfer, to sign (1) an agreement that any acquired interest in the LGK® System is subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and evidencing such transferee’s agreement to be bound, to the same extent as End User, by the then-surviving provisions of this Agreement, including but not limited to the technical and scientific information provisions (Section 3.3), the confidentiality provisions (Article IV), the provisions of Articles V and VII hereof, and the provisions of the LGK® Software License or (2) a similar agreement otherwise approved by the Elekta, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.

 

8.2            Subcontractors . Elekta shall be entitled to appoint subcontractors or any other third parties for the performance or fulfillment in whole or in part of Elekta’s obligations under this Agreement without the consent of End User, and Elekta shall be fully responsible and liable for the performance of other entities. Elekta shall be entitled to assign any of its rights or obligations hereunder to any of its Affiliates without the consent of End User, but Elekta agrees that it will be fully responsible for any obligations assigned to Elekta’s Affiliates hereunder.

 

8.3            Arbitration. All disputes arising in connection with this Agreement shall be finally resolved by arbitration in Atlanta, Georgia under the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Judgment upon the award rendered may be entered in any court having jurisdiction or application may be made to such court for judicial acceptance of such award and an order of enforcement as the case may be. The parties hereby agree the rendering of an award by the arbitrator or arbitrators shall be a condition precedent to the initiation of any legal proceeding with respect to any dispute arising in connection with this Agreement. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia and the United States.

 

8.4            Entire Agreement . This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous agreements, negotiations or discussions between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No amendment of the provisions of this Agreement will be valid unless made in writing and signed by both parties hereto..

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this Agreement in duplicate as of the date first written above.

 

ELEKTA INC. END USER
   
By: /s/ Ian Dickson By: /s/ Denise Schepici
   
Title:  Treasurer Title: Sr. Vice President
   
Date: 11/6/13 Date:  8/1/13

 

20
Exhibit 10.22b

 

EXHIBIT A

SPECIFICATION

Leksell Gamma Knife ® PERFEXION™

 
 
PRODUCT SPECIFICATION
Standard turn-key system

 

Qty   Description   Article no.
1   Leksell Gamma Knife ® PERFEXIONTM   715000
2   Leksell ® Coordinate FrameTM Kit for PERFEXIONTM   1002407
1   Leksell GammaPlan ®   in BOM
1   PERFEXION TM system tool kit    
1   LSS Spare Part Kit for Leksell ® Coordinate FrameTM   1002406
1   Skull scaling instrument   A0202-01
1   CT planning kit    
1   MRI planning kit    
1   X-ray planning kit    
1   Set of Co 60 sources   2000000
    Cobalt loading    
    Site planning    
    Installation and commissioning    
         
1   Support and Education & Training for PERFEXIONTM  

SER PERFEXION

0001

 

21
Exhibit 10.22b

 

Leksell Gamma Knife ® PERFEXION™

Radiation unit

- With radiation shielding doors and collimator system.

 

Patient Positioning SystemTM

- Patient couch and automatic Patient Positioning System.

 

Covers for radiation unit and Patient Positioning System

 

Electric cabinet

- Electric cabinet with cabling

- ECU - central unit and safety system electronic board, circuit breakers and cabling.

- SDU - sector drive electronic board, circuit breakers and cabling

- PPC1-software

- PPC2- software

- Medical UPS

 

Operator area

- Office cabinet

- Keyboard and mouse

- Operator console with patient and operator audio/video, power supply, opto insulators, cabling and connectors

Flat screen monitors

Office UPS

 

MCU kit

MCU PC with USB CAN

MCU software

 

Treatment couch

Height adjustable mattress

Manual controls for treatment setup

 

Frame adapter

Model “Standard G”. For interfacing between Leksell Coordinate Frame model G and Leksell Gamma Knife PERFEXION™.

 

Clearance check tool

 

Document set

Installation and supplementary documents

2 instructions for use

2 emergency routines

Signs and labels

 

22
Exhibit 10.22b

 

Leksell ® Coordinate Frame ® Kit for PERFEXION TM

Includes:

 

Qty   Consists Of:   Article No.
1   Frame with Feet and Straight Front Piece   50487-01
1   Front Piece, Curved   60638-01
2   Insulated Fixation Post, Anterior   912462
2   Insulated Fixation Post, Short Posterior   912463
2   Insulated Fixation Post, Long Posterior   912862
6   Locking Screw, 5 x 19 mm, Titanium   60490-03
6   Locking Piece for Fixation Post   60497-01
1   Ear Plug Holder, Right   50498-01
1   Ear Plug Holder, Left   50498-02
2   Ear Plug   60136-01
1   Fixation Screws, Titanium, kit of 20 pairs   907999
2   Instrument Screw Driver, Double   50146-02
1   Sterilizing Tray for Frame   50151-03
4   Disposable Inserts, 25x4 pieces   912464
1   Instruction for Use, Leksell® Coordinate Frame kit `   003818
1   Instructions for Use, Insulated Fixation Posts   012594
1   Quick Reference Guide   014611

 

PERFEXION TM system tool kit

Includes:

QA tool 1001182
- For radiation focus precision check.  
Frame Cap 717960

- The frame cap is used during patient preparation for a treatment with Leksell Gamma Knife ® PERFEXIONTM.

 

LSS Spare Part Kit for Leksell ® Coordinate Frame TM Consists of 4 pieces of each of the following;

- Locking Screw, 5 x 19 mm, Titanium

- Locking Piece for Fixation Post

- Screw, 4 x 10 mm, Titanium

 

Skull scaling instrument

For measurement of skull shape for Leksell GammaPlan ® modeling

 

23
Exhibit 10.22b

 

CT planning kit  
Includes:  
CT indicator A0800-11
- Fiducial box for CT imaging procedure  
CT adapter A0400-04
- Fixating the stereotactic frame to the CT table fixation  
CT table fixation A0401-XX
- Fixating the CT adapter to specified CT table.  
   
MRI planning kit  
Includes:  
MR adapter A0420-XX
- Fixating the stereotactic frame to specified MR table.  
MR indicator A0820-07
- Fiducial box for MR imaging procedure  
   
X-ray planning kit  
Includes:  
X-ray indicator A0860-04
- Fiducial box for angiography imaging procedure  
X-ray adapter and support A0440-XX
- Fixating the stereotactic frame to specified angiography table.  

 

Standard LGP for LGK PERFEXION

Includes one (1) Leksell GammaPlan® (LGP) license for creating new treatment plans for Leksell Gamma Knife® PERFEXIONTM .This main license allows the addition, management and storage of an unlimited number patient records and treatment plans. LGP also allows the visualization of treatment plans created at other LGK units.

 

24
Exhibit 10.22b

 

Leksell GammaPlan® for Leksell Gamma Knife® PERFEXION TM includes:

 

1 STANDARD LGP FOR PERFEXION LICENSE

 

Includes one (1) Leksell GammaPlan® (LGP) license for creating new treatment plans for Leksell Gamma Knife® PERFEXIONTM .This main license allows the addition, management and storage of an unlimited number patient records and treatment plans. LGP also allows the visualization of treatment plans created at other LGK units.

 

1 RETREATMENTTM LICENSE

 

This software add-on facilitates planning of treatments days before surgery, the assessment of treatments and re-treatments. Users are free to plan days ahead of treatment, to prepare tomorrow’s follow-ups and plan additional treatment. Re-TreatmentTM also lets any user to integrate images and vital treatment information from previous plans. It is a powerful tool to import and display previous key treatment data in the new treatment images. Imported data are user defined regions (targets, risk structures) and prescription isodose. It increases the customer confidence when treating new lesions after an initial treatment.

 

1 WARPSPEEDTM, REAL-TIME DOSE UPDATE LICENSE

 

This add-on speeds up planning by allowing the update of isodoses instantly during planning. Isodoses displayed in any workspace are instantly updated whenever one or several isocenters are added, modified, or removed. It is possible to fully apprehend the potential of composite shots, while also simplifying the elaboration of new dose plans. WarpSpeed™ provides a shorter learning curve, more intuitive and faster planning.

 

1 FUNCTIONAL PLANNING™ LICENSE

 

This software add-on allows users to perform some functional procedures based on the definition on the AC-PC line the visualization of functional targets based on functional target formulas.

 

1 IMAGEMERGE™ LICENSE

 

This software add-on allows an automatic or manual co-registration of any frameless image studies with a frame based reference study. Once co-registered, the frameless image can be used in LGP like any other study. Supports MR, CT and PET images (requires the optional module ColorPETTM).

 

1 COLOR PET™ LICENSE

 

The ColorPET™ software add-on help users to can combine the physiological data of PET images with the anatomical data of CT and MR images using predefined color lookup tables. Requires the ImageMerge software add-on.

 

25
Exhibit 10.22b

 

Color Printer 110V

Network color laser printer with

- Ethernet connector, minimum speed 10/100
- Support for Postscript Level 3 printing
- Power supply 110 V
- English menus and labels
- Support for printing A4, US letter, US executive and US legal

Delivered model: HP Color Laser Jet or similar

 

Additional Training for Leksell Gamma Knife ® PERFEXIONTM

 

6 Clinical Training

Principle and practice of Gamma Knife Surgery, clinical lectures, treatment planning, patient treatment - 5 days. Arranged by Elekta in collaboration with participating hospital.

 

1 LGP – DICOM RT License

DICOM RT provides an exclusive possibility to share treatment information with any DICOM RT compatible system. It includes:

IMPORT of DICOM RT STRUCT allows displaying any user-defined region/volume created on a DICOM RT system. Volumes can be target volumes, organ at risks, isodoses or any other region of interest defined by the user.

EXPORT of treatment data via DICOM RT STRUCT and DICOM RT DOSE allows sharing information with any compatible systems to perform dose comparison or dose addition.

 

26
Exhibit 10.22b

 

Technical Specifications

 

Workflow
Automatic positioning system Couch integrated
Typical repositioning time < 3 s
Typical collimator size setup time < 3 s
Blocked collimation setup time < 3 s
Mixed collimation setup time (Composite shot) < 3 s
Check and verify 100%
QA procedure Automatic
Accuracy
Radiological accuracy < 0.5 mm
   
Positioning repeatability < 0.05 mm
Maximum patient weight 210 kg (460 pounds)
Treatment planning
Treatment planning system PC/Linux based
Dynamic shaping Yes
Remote planning Yes
Image co-registration Yes
PET supported Yes
Mechanical treatment range X/Y/Z 160/180/220 mm
Shape of accessible volume Cylindrical
Real collimator sizes 4,8,16 mm diameter
Radiation data
Total cobalt-60 activity at loading (approx.) < 6,600 Curie (2.44 x 10 14 Bq)
Number of radiation sources 192
Radiation dose rate at focal point at loading > 3 Gy/min
Physical data
Overall length, including cover 4.46 m
Overall width, including cover 2.12 m
Overall height, including cover 1.91 m
Total weight (approximate) 20,000 kg

 

27
Exhibit 10.22b

 

Radiation unit

The radiation unit is the radiation delivery system. It houses 192 Cobalt-60 sources and the collimator system that directs the radiation to the focus point. The radiation unit incorporates the management of the shielding doors and electro-mechanics of the source sectors.

 

The following section describes selected components within the radiation unit.

All components are chosen from well-recognized suppliers to secure reliability and to optimize performance of the system.

 

Collimator body with radiation shielding
Collimator body Tungsten body with 576 collimator channels.
Collimators Tungsten collimator inserts.
Pre-collimator 576 lead pre-collimator channels.
Outer shielding Cast iron.
Inner shielding Tungsten and lead.
Bearing for collimator body Crossed roller bearing. Static axial load 680000 N
Shielding doors Steel.
Shielding strips Stainless Steel.
Servo Controller High precision, fully digital servo drive with embedded intelligence.
Motor DC motor with 2000 line encoder
Linear guide  
Linear guide blocks Caged ball technology.
Gear Planetary gear
Clutch Ratchetting clutch
8 source carrying sector units
Sector Aluminum. 24 source housing
Shafts Induction hardened stainless steel.
Bearings Graphite bushings
Motor 24V DC motor
Encoder 500 impulses/turn
Linear guide unit Repeatability: ±0.003mm.
Linear encoder Absolute Linear encoder.
Solenoid Photo-micro sensor.
Servo controllers Intelligent servo card

 

28
Exhibit 10.22b

 

Patient Positioning System

The Patient Positioning System is the component of the PERFEXION™ system that the patient reclines on for treatment and is positioned relative the point of focus in the radiation unit.

 

The following section describes selected components within the Patient Positioning System.

All components are chosen from well-recognized suppliers to secure reliability and to optimize the performance of Leksell Gamma Knife PERFEXION.

 

Couch framework with X/Y/Z drive
Framework 20 mm zinc chromated steel
Motors DC motors with 2000 line encoders.
Gear X/Y-axis Planetary gear 30:1 Z-axis Planetary gear 4:1
Ball screws Bearing houses Support bearings X/Z -axis.
Screw jack Y-axis: Integrated safety nut.
Linear guides  
Linear guide blocks Caged ball technology.
Solenoid Y-axis: Photo-micro sensor.
Linear encoders Absolute Linear encoders. Accuracy grade +/- 0.005mm.
Servo Controllers High precision, fully digital servo drive, with embedded intelligence.
Frame fixation Hardened stainless steel
Comfort system
Mattress support Sandwich structure with aluminum honeycomb core and steel sheets
Actuator DC actuator
Ball bearing Stainless steel.
Covers
Radiation unit and couch covers 3 layers glass reinforced polyester. Meets ASTM E84 with flame spread index less than 75. Flammability rating V-0 according to UL 94.

 

29
Exhibit 10.22b


Control System

 

Office Cabinet

 

Includes:

 

MCU - Main Computer Unit

Office UPS - Uninterrupted Power Supply

Ethernet Switch

 

Operators Console

Includes:

 

CIU - Connection and Isolation Unit

The CIU is powered by the office UPS and the internal power supply converting 100-250VAC to 24VDC.

 

PSS - Patient Surveillance system

The PSS is included in the operator console as a separate unit and handles the video/audio signals of the PERFEXION™ system. It is possible to connect a video recorder on the ‘auxiliary’ outputs.

 

External audio system, e.g., patients MP3 player, can be connected and played over the sound system integrated in the radiation unit covers.

 

MCU Monitor

19” Flat screen, UL-approved.

The MCU Monitor shows the Graphical User Interface of the MCU.

 

PSS Monitor

19” Flat screen, UL-approved.

The PSS monitor shows the video from the patient camera and provides the sound from the patient microphone.

 

Treatment room Monitor

19” Flat screen, UL-approved.

The treatment room monitor displays the same information as the MCU monitor on the operators console.

 

Treatment room Camera

The treatment room camera provides video to the PSS Monitor in the Operators Area.

 

Medical Cabinet

Includes:

 

SDU - Sector Drive Unit

The SDU contains 8 servo controllers (one for each sector).

 

ECU - Electronic Control Unit

The Control Unit consists of two complete Power PCs (PPC) with peripherals (RAM, ROM, inputs, outputs, CAN interfaces).

 

Medical UPS - Uninterrupted Power Supply

The medical UPS delivers 24VDC and 48VDC needed for the PERFEXIONTM system. It is approved for medical use.

 

Radiation phantom

The Radiation Phantom with Cassettes is used for calibrating the absorbed dose rate of Leksell Gamma Knife®.

 

30
Exhibit 10.22b

INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED BY BUYER

 

Not later than six months prior to the Contractual Delivery Date or two weeks after the Effective Date, whichever occurs later, Buyer shall inform Seller in writing of:

 

(i)        the orientation of the LGK

 

(ii)      the minimum lengths of cables required to connect the LGK at the Site; and

 

(iii)     the manufacturer and model numbers of the CT, MRI and angiographic equipment which Buyer intends to use in connection with the LGK.

 

31
Exhibit 10.22b

 

EXHIBIT B
DESCRIPTION OF SITE

 

TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER

750 WASHINGTON ST STE 1012

BOSTON, MA 02111-1526

 

32
Exhibit 10.22b

 

EXHIBIT C
ELEKTA'S WARRANTY

 

1. Subject to the exceptions set forth below, Elekta warrants to Buyer that for one year from the date of completed Installation Test Protocol, the LGK will perform consistently with the Specification and the LGK will be free from defects in design, materials, and workmanship which result in non-compliance with the Specification, except as otherwise provided herein below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Elekta’s warranty set forth in this Section 1 does not cover:

 

(i) defects arising out of materials or parts provided, modified or designed by Buyer;
(ii) defects emanating from Buyer’s improper use or maintenance;
(iii) normal deterioration or normal wear and tear, including radioactive decay of the Cobalt Supply;
(iv) defects resulting from repairs or service of the LGK supplied other than by Elekta or its authorized representative;
(v) defects in the Hardware (and its operating software) (the warranty for which is regulated in Section 7 below) or the LGP Software (the warranty for which is regulated in Section 2 below).
(vi) the training referred to in Subsection 3.2 of the Terms and Conditions; or
(vii) defects in positioning or in the Site.

 

2. Elekta warrants that the LGP Software will, for a period of one year from the date of the completed Installation Test Protocol, perform substantially in accordance with the documentation delivered with such LGP Software. The warranty set forth in this Section 2 shall not apply if the LGP Software is subject to unauthorized repair or modification, improper application, improper installation, accidental damage, negligence in use, improper storage, acts of God, electrical power damage, equipment malfunction, or abnormal operating conditions, and in the event of any of the foregoing, Buyer shall be responsible to pay Elekta’s then standard charges for any repairs, replacements or services performed by Elekta.

 

3. In the event that the LGK or any part or component thereof shall fail to conform with the relevant warranty described herein, Elekta shall (or cause one of its Affiliates to) promptly repair or replace, at its option and at its expense, the defect in the LGK or component thereof. Repair or replacement parts furnished or work performed under this warranty shall be warranted for a period of one year from and after the date of such repair of replacement, but in no event shall any such warranty with respect to repair or replacement work or parts extend past that date which is two (2) years from and after the date of completion of the Installation Test Protocol. The defective LGK or part thereof which is replaced in accordance with this warranty shall be the property of Elekta, and Elekta will notify Buyer in writing immediately after repair or replacement as to what disposition Elekta desires of such LGK or part thereof, all at Elekta’s cost.

 

4. In order to avail itself of its rights under this warranty, Buyer shall immediately notify Elekta in writing of any defects that appear under the warranty and shall give Elekta every opportunity of inspecting and remedying such defects.

 

5. Year 2000 Compliance Warranty. Elekta further warrants that the equipment, software and use of data will be year 2000 compliant and accommodate a full year calculation in its software. Licensor will guarantee that the equipment and software will accept all data and perform to comply with the year 2000 warranties, assuring that the full four (4) positions (e.g. 1997) year is utilized.

 

6. THE FOREGOING WARRANTIES ARE EXCLUSIVE AND GIVEN AND ACCEPTED IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OF ELEKTA OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES WITH RESPECT TO QUALITY, PERFORMANCE AND OPERATION OF THE LGK, WRITTEN OR ORAL, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OF ELEKTA OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. CORRECTION OF NON-CONFORMITIES OR DEFECTS AS PROVIDED ABOVE SHALL BE BUYER’S EXCLUSIVE REMEDY AND SHALL CONSTITUTE FULL AND FINAL FULFILLMENT OF ALL LIABILITIES OF ELEKTA, WHETHER IN WARRANTY, CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, TORT OR OTHERWISE WITH RESPECT TO THE LGK. IN NO EVENT SHALL ELEKTA BE LIABLE FOR LOSS OF USE, REVENUE OR PROFIT, OR FOR ANY OTHER DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE ARISING IN ANY RESPECT FROM THE LGK OR ITS USE, OPERATION OR PERFORMANCE. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL SURVIVE THE TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT.

 

7. Elekta shall assign to Buyer all of Elekta’s rights under the warranty or warranties provided by the manufacturer (the “Computer Manufacturer”) for the Hardware and operating software included in the LGK. In the event the Hardware or operating software exhibit defects which are covered by the warranty of the Computer Manufacturer, Buyer may notify Elekta of the nature of such defects. In such case, Elekta shall promptly inform the Computer Manufacturer thereof and use its best efforts to arrange prompt repair service by the Computer Manufacturer pursuant to the terms of the Computer Manufacturer’s warranty or warranties Elekta shall furnish Buyer with such reasonable cooperation as Buyer may request with respect to the purchase by Buyer of any extended warranty or maintenance contract offered by the Computer Manufacturer.
33
Exhibit 10.22b

 

EXHIBIT D

LEKSELL GAMMAPLAN ® PFX TM SOFTWARE LICENSE

 

1. LGP Software
1.1 Elekta hereby licenses to Buyer at no additional cost beyond the Purchase Price, the LGP Software, to be utilized only for the purpose of planning dosages of treatments to be performed with the LGK. In case Buyer already has an existing Leksell Gamma Knife ® Buyer may also retain one license to the old Leksell Gamma Plan ® software for archival purposes. Such license is also subject to the license terms and conditions set out in this Exhibit E. Such license is for the use by Buyer of the software at one (1) workstation.
1.2 Buyer shall not: (a) use LGP except in connection with the radiosurgical operations performed with the LGK at the Site; (b) make any modification to, adapt, translate, decompile, disassemble or create derivative works based on LGP or merge LGP into any other software; (c) reproduce LGP (or any portion thereof) or any materials related thereto except for one back-up copy made as part of Buyer’s regular computer software maintenance routines; (d) transfer, assign or sublicense LGP to any person except to an assignee of all of Buyer’s rights in this Agreement in a manner permitted by Section 8.1 of the Terms and Conditions; or (e) use LGP in connection with any access terminal other than the Hardware which has been specifically approved by Elekta in writing.
1.3 All right, title, interest and ownership of, in and to LGP, including but not limited to all trademarks, service marks, registrations, copyrights, and all other proprietary rights not expressly granted in this License, shall at all times remain the exclusive property of Elekta. Elekta shall retain all rights to LGP recorded on the original disk(s) and all subsequent copies of LGP, in whatever form recorded.
1.4 The term of Buyer’s license to LGP shall continue until the earlier of: (a) any sublicense, assignment or transfer or attempted sublicense, assignment or transfer by Buyer of LGP without the consent of Elekta; (b) the transport, movement or attempted transport or movement by the Buyer of LGP, or the Hardware on which LGP is installed, from the Site without prior written consent of Elekta; (c) any modification or adaptation of LGP for use with any equipment other than the LGK; (d) the use of LGP in connection with more than one access terminal unless Buyer has obtained the written consent of Elekta to the use of more than one access terminal at the same time or in connection with any access terminal other than the Hardware which has not been specifically approved by Elekta in writing; or (E) the mutual written consent of Buyer and Elekta.

 

2. Buyer’s Responsibilities Concerning Hardware and LGP
2.1 To facilitate E-Mail/Internet support, Buyer shall provide for E-Mail/Internet connectivity.
2.2 Buyer shall assign a system manager who will undergo the appropriate training on the operating system HP-UX and /or already have sufficient UNIX system administrator experience. Such training will be provided by the Hardware manufacturer and Elekta shall pay the fee therefore. Buyer shall pay all travel and other expenses associated with such training.
2.3 If Buyer elects to transfer images by a data network, then :
(a) Buyer shall provide the format to and right to read the diagnostic images generated by the user’s diagnostic equipment and planned to be used as input for LGP. The Buyer shall provide a sample image in digital and hard copy form in the orientation intended for clinical use.
(b) Buyer is responsible for obtaining up-to-date and accurate scanner image formats and any other scanner or PACS information from vendors necessary to integrate images into LGP and providing this to Elekta.
(c) The Hardware used to run LGP must be used solely for this purpose. All changes and additions to LGP and/or Hardware running LGP must receive prior written approval of Elekta.
(d) Buyer shall provide the images via an Ethernet connection using TCP/IP protocol and will provide all physical cabling to the LGP Hardware compatible with 100-Base-T or 1000-Base-T at the Installation location of the LGK.
(e) Buyer shall provide all TCP/IP networking parameters such as IP address, netmask, gateway address, etc. for the HP workstation included as a part of the Hardware.

 

34
Exhibit 10.22b

 

EXHIBIT E

 

END USER AGREEMENT AMENDMENTS

 

This page left intentionally blank.

 

35
Exhibit 10.22b

 

Exhibit 2

 

PER PROCEDURE PAYMENTS

 

 

Annual Procedures Performed

 

Initial Non-Medicare

Fee Per Procedure

 

Initial Medicare

Fee Per Procedure 1

*   *   *
*   *   *
*   *   *
*   *   *

 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, (a) for purposes of determining the per procedure payment, the number of annual procedures performed shall be reset to zero (0) on each anniversary of the first day of the first full month after the Effective Date of this Agreement; (b) for purposes of determining the applicable per procedure payment tier, non-Medicare and Medicare procedures will be grouped chronologically as they are performed; and (c) there shall be no retroactive adjustment of the per procedure payment irrespective of whether the number of procedures performed during any fiscal year reaches a lower per procedure payment level. For example, if during an annual measuring period, * procedures are performed (of which * are non-Medicare procedures and * are Medicare procedures), then, (i) for each of the first * procedures performed (irrespective of the number of non-Medicare and Medicare procedures comprising the first * procedures), Medical Center would pay * for each non-Medicare procedure and * for each Medicare procedure; and (ii) for each of the next * procedures performed (irrespective of the number of non-Medicare and Medicare procedures comprising the next * procedures), Medical Center would pay * for each non-Medicare procedure and * for each Medicare procedure.

 

36
Exhibit 10.22b

 

Exhibit 3

 

DESIGNATED PAYORS

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

37

 

Exhibit 21

 

The subsidiaries of American Shared Hospital Services are :

 

MedLeader.com, Inc.

A California corporation

 

OR21, Inc.

A California corporation

 

Long Beach Equipment, LLC

A Delaware limited liability company

 

ASHSDB#1, LLC

ASHSDB#2, LLC

Both Delaware limited liability companies

 

Subsidiaries of ASHSDB#1 and ASHSDB#2

ASHS do Brasil Equipamentos Medicos LTDA

A Brazilian company

 

American Shared Radiosurgery Services

A California corporation

 

Subsidiaries of American Shared Radiosurgery Services

 

GK Financing, LLC

A California limited liability company

 

Subsidiaries of GK Financing, LLC

 

Albuquerque GK Equipment, LLC

A Delaware limited liability company

 

Jacksonville GK Equipment, LLC

A Delaware limited liability company

 

Instituto de Gamma Knife del Pacifico S.A.C.

A Peruvian company

 

GK Financing U.K. LTD

An England and Wales private limited company

 

EWRS, LLC

A Delaware limited liability company

 

EWRS Tibbi Cihazler Ticaret Ltd. Sti.

A Turkish company

 

GKFDB#1, LLC

GKFDB#2, LLC

Both Delaware limited liability companies

 

Subsidiaries of GKFDB#1 and GKFDB#2

GKF do Brasil Equipamentos Medicos LTDA

A Brazilian company

 

 

 

Exhibit 23.1

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-170650, 333-139446, 333-81138, 333-73172 and 333-08009) and Form S-3 (No. 333-12879) of our report dated March 31, 2014 relating to the consolidated financial statements appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Shared Hospital Services and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

  /S/ MOSS ADAMS LLP  
     
Stockton, CA    
March 31, 2014    

 

 

 

Exhibit 31 (a)

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Ernest A. Bates, M.D., as chief executive officer of American Shared Hospital Services, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013 of American Shared Hospital Services;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting .

 

March 31, 2014    
     
/s/ Ernest A. Bates, M.D.    
Ernest A. Bates, M.D.    
Chief Executive Officer    

 

 

 

Exhibit 31 (b)

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Craig K. Tagawa, as chief financial officer of American Shared Hospital Services, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013 of American Shared Hospital Services;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting

 

March 31, 2014    
     
/s/ Craig K. Tagawa    
Craig K. Tagawa    
Chief Financial Officer    

 

 

 

Exhibit 32

 

March 31, 2014

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) and Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Exchange Act and does not constitute a part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) accompanying this letter.

 

Ernest A. Bates, M.D., the Chief Executive Officer and Craig K. Tagawa, the Chief Financial Officer of American Shared Hospital Services, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of American Shared Hospital Services.

 

  /s/ Ernest A. Bates, M.D.  
  Ernest A. Bates, M.D.  
  Chief Executive Officer  
     
  /s/ Craig K. Tagawa  
  Craig K. Tagawa  
  Chief Financial Officer