UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549   

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of September 2014

Commission File Number: 001-35755

CIS ACQUISITION LTD.

89 Udaltsova Street, Suite 84

Moscow, Russia, 119607

Telephone: (917) 514-1310
(Address of Principal Executive Office)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F x Form 40-F ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes ¨ No x

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-_______________.

IMPORTANT NOTICES

This Current Report on Form 6-K, including the exhibits contained herein, contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Other than statements of historical facts, all statements included in this report regarding Elite Ride Limited (“Elite”), and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Delta Advanced Materials Limited, a Hong Kong company (“Delta”), as well as Delta’s four wholly-owned operating subsidiaries in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”): Jiangsu Yangtze Delta Fine Chemical Co., Ltd (“Jiangsu Delta”), Jiangsu Zhengxin New Material Research and Development Co., Ltd (“Jiangsu Zhengxin”), Jiangsu Delta Logistics Co., Ltd (“Jiangsu Logistics”), and Binhai Deda Chemical Co., Ltd (“Binhai Deda”). Unless otherwise specified or required by context, references to “we,” “Delta,” “Delta Companies,” “our” and “us” refer collectively to Elite, Delta, Jiangsu Delta, Jiangsu Zhengxin, Jiangsu Logistics and Binhai Deda. Further, references to CIS’s strategy, future operations, future financial position, prospects, plans and objectives of management, as well as statements, other than statements of historical facts, regarding the Delta Companies’ industry, are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. The acquisition parties may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements, and investors should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements made by the acquisition parties. Important factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements, include among others: changing principles of generally accepted accounting principles; outcomes of government reviews, inquiries, investigations and related litigation; compliance with government regulations; legislation or regulatory environments, requirements or changes adversely affecting the pharmaceutical benefits management and related services industry; fluctuations in customer demand; management of rapid growth; changes in government policy; overall economic conditions and local market economic conditions; the Delta Companies’ ability to expand through strategic acquisitions and establishment of new locations; and geopolitical events. Further, the forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures, collaborations or investments made by the acquisition parties. Neither CIS nor the Delta Companies assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.

On September 16, 2014, a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) was entered into by and among CIS Acquisition Ltd., a British Virgin Islands Company (“CIS”), Elite Ride Limited, a British Virgin Islands Company (“Elite”) and Delta Advanced Materials Limited, a Hong Kong company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Elite and the shareholders of Elite.

Acquisition of Elite

Upon the closing of the transaction as contemplated in the Purchase Agreement, CIS will acquire all of the shares held by the shareholders of Elite (the “Acquisition”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, all holders of shares of Elite will exchange their shares of Elite for shares of CIS as more fully described below. As a result, following the Acquisition, the Delta Companies will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of CIS.

Acquisition Consideration

The holders (the “Elite Shareholders”) of all of the outstanding shares of Elite (the “Elite Shares”) immediately prior to or at the time of closing shall sell, convey, transfer, assign each of their Elite Shares to CIS which shall issue to the Elite Shareholders an aggregate of 6,060,000 ordinary shares of CIS, par value $0.0001 per share (“CIS Common Stock”) as payment for the Elite Shares (the “Purchase Price”). The Purchase Price shall be paid as follows: (i) 4,560,000 shares of CIS Common Stock shall be issued at closing; plus (ii) an additional 1,500,000 shares of CIS Common Stock shall be issued and placed in escrow pursuant to an Escrow Agreement and released based upon the meeting of certain net income performance targets as specified in the Purchase Agreement and summarized below (the “Earnout Payment Shares”).

The Earnout Payment Shares, if any, will be issued as follows: (a) 500,000 shares shall be issued if the Company achieves Adjusted Net Income of at least $8 million for the period starting July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015; (b) 500,000 shares shall be issued if the Company achieves Adjusted Net Income of at least $9.2 million for the period starting July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2016; (c) 500,000 shares shall be issued if the Company achieves Adjusted Net Income of at least $10.6 million for the period starting July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017 (collectively, the “Net Income Targets”). Further, during the thirteen (13) months post-closing, all material acquisitions made by the Company must be accretive to Company earnings. A “material acquisition” is an acquisition that would, when comparing the most recent annual financial statements of each company, result in a change of 5% or more to the Company’s revenue, net income, total liabilities or total assets. To be “accretive”, an acquisition must be acquired at a P/E ratio that is at a 20% discount to the P/E ratio at which the Company is trading (based on the last sales price) on the day prior to the date that the definitive agreement for the acquisition is signed. The Net Income Targets are to be met on an all-or-nothing basis, and there shall be no partial awards.

Concurrently with the Acquisition, CIS will issue 500,000 shares of CIS Common Stock to Kyle Shostak and CIS Acquisition Holding Co. Ltd. (collectively, the “CIS Sponsor”), proportionally in accordance with their ownership in CIS.

Value Rachet

If the 10 trading day volume weighted average price of the CIS Common Stock (the “VWAP”) is lower than $5.00 per share on the principal stock exchange on which such stock is traded on the earlier to occur of (i) the 395th day after the closing and (ii) the 30th day after the SEC declares a registration statement filed by CIS effective during the first 12 months after the closing,  then CIS will issue the CIS Sponsor, proportionally in accordance with their respective share ownership in CIS, an additional number of shares of CIS Common Stock equal to  (i) (a) $5.00 minus the VWAP, divided by the VWAP, multiplied by (ii) the lesser of (a) 1,500,000 and (b) the total number of shares of CIS Common Stock owned by CIS Sponsor on such date. The total number of CIS Common Stock will be reduced by the number of shares CIS Sponsor sells during 13 months post-closing.

Arrangement with Respect to Proceeds of CIS’ Public Warrants and CIS Sponsor Warrants

CIS has agreed that in the event that there is any exercise of CIS Public Warrants which were issued in CIS’ initial public offering or the warrants to purchase CIS Common Stock issued to any CIS Sponsor, any proceeds of such exercise shall be paid to certain shareholders of Elite. CIS will not retain any portion of the proceeds of such exercise.

Call Agreement

CIS and the CIS Sponsor agreed to enter into a Call Agreement (the “Call Agreement”) mutually acceptable to CIS, Elite and the CIS Sponsor pursuant to which CIS shall be permitted, between the 360 ^th and 390 ^th after the closing date, to require the CIS Sponsor to sell to it, at a price of $5.00 per share, up to 1,500,000 shares of CIS Common Stock.

Amendment to CIS Placement Warrants

In connection with the Acquisition, the CIS Sponsor shall amend the 4,500,000 CIS Placement Warrants owned by the CIS Sponsor to provide that such warrants may be redeemed in the event CIS Common Stock trades at a price of $17.50 per share for a period of ten (10) consecutive trading days and that such warrants may not be exercised on a cashless basis.

Representations; Covenants

Each of the parties to the Purchase Agreement has made customary representations to the other parties to the Purchase Agreement.

Elite and Delta have covenanted: (i) except for the sale and/or issuance of any Elite Shares and other actions to be taken by Delta and/or Elite to effectuate the restructuring of debt owned by previously existing private equity firms, Elite, Delta and Delta’s subsidiaries shall conduct the business in all material respects in the ordinary course, consistent with past practices, and shall not enter into any material transactions without the prior written consent of CIS, and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its business relationships with employees, clients, suppliers and other third parties; (ii) to notify CIS of certain events; (iii) to file certain reports with the SEC and provide any information requested by CIS or its representatives in connection with any filing with the SEC; (iv) to provide additional information or financial statements requested by CIS; (v) to maintain the exclusivity and confidentiality of discussions and negotiations related to the Acquisition; (vi) to use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain certain consents as promptly as practicable; (vii) to deliver to CIS the consolidated financial statements of Delta as of and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014; (viii) that Elite or its affiliates shall purchase by no later than the closing date, 500,000 shares of CIS’s Class A shares from public shareholders; (ix) that Elite will have (a) indebtedness for borrowed money not in excess of $85,000,000 as of the Closing Date, (b) no shareholder indebtedness (c) trade and other payables not in excess of $40,000,000, (d) advances from customers not in excess of $2,000,000, (e) tax and deferred tax liabilities not in excess of $2,500,000, (f) dividend payable of $35,000,000 and (g) not less than $7,500,000 in unrestricted cash on the balance sheet post dividend; and (x) that Elite and Delta shall promptly as reasonably practical provide CIS with information reasonably requested for inclusion in a Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K to be filed with the SEC.

CIS has covenanted to: (i) conduct its business in all material respects in the ordinary course, consistent with past practices, and shall not enter into any material transactions without the prior written consent of Delta; (ii) conduct its business in compliance with applicable laws in all material respects and to preserve intact its business organization; (iii) make appropriate arrangements to cause the funds in the trust account to be disbursed in accordance with the Investment Management Trust Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2012, between CIS and the American Stock Transfer & Trust Company; (iv) make such notice and other filings and obtain any consents, approvals, or authorizations required by federal, state and foreign securities laws for CIS to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement and additional agreements named therein to which CIS is named as a party; (v) to comply with each of the agreements entered into in connection with an initial public offering of CIS Common Stock and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to have filed and have one or more registration statements declared effective by the SEC registering the exercise of the public warrants issued as part of the units sold in CIS’s IPO and registering for resale the securities, and the securities underlying such securities, of CIS outstanding immediately prior to CIS’s IPO, in each case within six (6) months from the Closing Date; and (vi) to register the CIS Common Stock in accordance with the Registration Rights Agreement, by and among CIS and the holders of Elite (the “Registration Rights Agreement”).

All parties have covenanted to: (i) maintain the confidentiality of certain information; (ii) provide access to company information; (iii) injunctive relief as to certain restrictive covenants; (iv) use commercially reasonable efforts to consummate and implement expeditiously each of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement; (v) mutual notification of certain matters; and (vi) comply with certain tax related matters.

Conditions to Closing

The obligation of each party to complete the Acquisition and the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement are conditioned, among other things, upon the satisfaction of the following conditions: (i) no provision of any applicable law, and no order shall prohibit or impose any condition on the consummation of the Closing; (ii) there shall not be pending any action brought by a third-party non-affiliate to enjoin or otherwise restrict the consummation of the Closing; (iii) holders of not less than 12.5% of the IPO Shares ( as defined in CIS’s Amended and Restated Memorandum and Article of Association) shall have agreed to convert from Class A Shares to Class C Shares (each as defined in CIS’s Amended and Restated Articles of Association) in connection with the Closing; (iv) all authorizations, approvals and permits required to be obtained from or made with any authority in order to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement shall have been obtained or made; and (v) each party shall have entered into and delivered a counterpart signature page of each additional agreement required under the Purchase Agreement.

The obligation of CIS to consummate the Acquisition is conditioned, among other things, upon the satisfaction, or the waiver at CIS’s sole and absolute discretion, of the following further conditions: (i) Delta having duly performed in all material respects all of its obligations under the Purchase Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date; (ii) certain representations and warranties are true and correct in all respects; and (iii) no material adverse effect shall have occurred since the date of the Purchase Agreement.

The obligations of Delta and Elite to consummate the Acquisition are conditioned, among other things, upon the satisfaction, or the waiver at Delta and Elite’s sole and absolute discretion, of the following further conditions: (i) CIS having duly performed in all material respects all of its obligations under the Purchase Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date; (ii) the representations and warranties of CIS contained in the Purchase Agreement and in any certificate or other writing delivered by CIS pursuant thereto, disregarding all qualifications and expectations contained therein relating to materiality and material adverse effect shall be true and correct in all material respects at and as of the Closing Date; (iii) no material adverse effect shall have occurred since the date of the Purchase Agreement; (iv) on the Closing Date, CIS shall have filed an application covering all shares of CIS Common Stock, including the Earnout Payment Shares, to be issued to the Elite Shareholders to approve such shares on The NASDAQ Capital Market, and CIS not having received any notice of delisting from the NASDAQ Capital Market; (v) CIS having at least $5,000,000 in cash at the Closing, after payment of any and all expenses of CIS incurred prior to the Closing Date; and (vi) Delta having received approval of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement and to the restructuring of certain debt owned by the previously existing private equity firms.

Indemnification; Escrow of Closing Payment

If Elite violates, misrepresents or breaches any of its representations, warranties, and covenants, it has agreed to certain indemnification. For that purpose, of the indemnification, an aggregate of 1,500,000 shares are being held in escrow for a period of 12 months following the Merger in order to satisfy any indemnification obligations of Elite. These 1,500,000 shares are the shares that are being held in escrow until CIS meets certain income thresholds. If CIS violates, misrepresent or breaches any of its representations, warranties, and covenants, it has agreed to indemnify the Elite stockholders up to $1,000,000. For purposes of the indemnification provisions of the Agreement, each share included in the Closing Payment will be deemed to be worth $10.40. However, no party shall be entitled to indemnification until the aggregate amount of Losses equals at least $100,000.

Termination

In the event that the Closing of the transactions contemplated under the Purchase Agreement has not occurred by September 21, 2014 (the “Outside Closing Date”), Delta, Elite or CIS shall have the right, at its sole option, to terminate the Purchase Agreement without liability to the other parties by giving written notice to the other parties at any time after the Outside Closing Date. Should the Purchase Agreement be terminated under such circumstances, each party shall be responsible for paying all of its own expenses.

If Delta or Elite materially breach any of their covenants, agreements, representations and warranties contained in the Purchase Agreement to be performed on or prior to the Closing Date, then CIS may terminate the Purchase Agreement by giving notice to Elite on or prior to the Closing Date, without prejudice to any rights of obligations CIS may have.

If CIS materially breaches any of its covenants, agreements, representations and warranties contained in the Purchase Agreement to be performed on or prior to the Closing Date, then Elite may terminate the Purchase Agreement by giving notice to CIS, without prejudice to any rights or obligations Delta or Elite may have.

Board of Directors and Voting Agreement

Immediately after the Closing, the board of directors of CIS will consist of five (5) directors, composed of four (4) nominees designated by Elite, of which at least two (2) designees shall qualify as an independent director under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market, if applicable, and one (1) nominee designated by CIS, who shall qualify as an independent director under the Exchange Act, and the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market, if applicable. The parties to the Purchase Agreement shall enter into a mutually agreed upon voting agreement relating to nominees to the board of directors of CIS for a period of thirteen (13) months following the closing (the “Voting Agreement”).

Registration Rights

CIS has agreed to enter into a Registration Rights Agreement with the CIS Sponsor and any other such parties with the rights to require CIS to register any securities of CIS held by such parties under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to terminate such demand registration rights and grant such parties piggyback registration rights.

The foregoing descriptions of the Purchase Agreement do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the complete agreement attached as exhibits hereto.

No Tender Offer

Due to the short amount of time available before September 21, 2014, CIS will not be conducting a tender offer to redeem publicly traded shares. Instead, CIS will redeem all holders of publicly traded shares that have not elected to convert their Series A Shares into Series C Shares promptly after September 21, 2014.

Termination of Material Definitive Agreement

On September 16, 2014, CIS terminated the Stock Purchase Agreement dated June 16, 2014 (the “RRIC Agreement”), between CIS, Red Rock Holdings Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Red Rock”), and Foster Jennings, Inc., the sole member of the Company (“Foster”) due to the breach of the RRIC Agreement by Red Rock and Foster.

DESCRIPTION OF DELTA’S BUSINESS

History of Delta

Founded in 2007, Delta is a Hong Kong based manufacturer and distributer of organic compound including para-chlorotoluene (“PCT”), ortho-chlorotoluene (“OCT”), PCT/OCT downstream products, unsaturated polyester resin (“UPR”), maleic acid (“MA”) and other by-product chemicals. In its fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, Delta posted revenue of approximately $175.3 million and net income of approximately $7.0 million. Including a foreign currency adjustment, Delta's comprehensive income was approximately $8.5 million in that period. Delta has approximately 300 employees, 25% of whom are highly-qualified experts and technical personnel. Delta serves more than 380 clients in automotive, pharmaceutical, agrochemical, dye & pigments, aerospace, ceramics, coating-printing and food additives industries.

History of Delta’s Subsidiaries

On June 15, 2007, Jiangsu Delta was established by S&S International Investment Holding (HK) Limited (“S&S International”), a Hong Kong based investment holding company, as a wholly foreign-owned enterprise (with an initial registered capital of US$42 million, which was later reduced to US$ 28.8 million) located in Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province, the PRC.

Pursuant to a share transfer agreement entered into on April 13, 2008, Mr. Xin Chao acquired the entire equity interest in Jiangsu Delta from S&S International through Zhengxin International Investment Limited, a Hong Kong corporation (“Zhengxin International”) and became the controller of Jiangsu Delta since then. On May 21, 2008, the acquisition of Jiangsu Delta by Zhengxin International was approved by the Jiangsu Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation Department in accordance with “The Approval of Alteration of Equities in and Amendment of the Articles of Association of Jiangsu Yantze River Delta Fine Chemical Co, Ltd.” issued by the same authority.

Jiangsu Delta commenced its commercial operations in 2009 with one productions line and approximately 150 employees. It was primarily engaged in the manufacturing and production of fine chemicals such as OCT and PCT as well as their down-steam products with approximately 100 customers.

With a view to expanding its business and catering for the demand of its customers, in 2010, Delta expanded Jiangsu Delta’s principal business scope to be producing and selling a variety of fine chemicals such as (i) pharmaceutical, pesticide and dye intermediates (mainly including Cis-Anhydride, P-(O) Chlorotoluene, (2, 4 Dichlorotoluene)), (ii) unsaturated polyester resin, (iii) maleic acid and (iv) other by-products chemicals, all of which are mainly used in pharmaceutical and agriculture industries. In addition, during the same period, Delta installed additional production facilities to substantially increase its production capacity from 7,000 tonnes to 25,000 tonnes per annum.

Due to the corporate restructuring effort to consolidate the business of Jiangsu Delta under a pure investment holding entity, pursuant to a sale and purchase agreement dated May 20, 2010 entered into between Zhengxin International and Delta Advanced Materials Limited, a Hong Kong corporation (“Delta”) for a consideration of US$28.8 million. Delta, formerly known as China Deltachem Holdings Limited, which was incorporated on June 17, 2010 as a pure investment holding vehicle controlled by Mr. Yu Lan and had an initial issued and paid-up share capital of HK$10,000 comprising 10,000 shares of HK$1.00 each. The said shares were issued at a total subscription price of HK$68,640,000 (equivalent to US$8,800,000) with a premium of HK$6,863 per share.

On August 30, 2010, the acquisition of Jiangsu Delta by Delta was approved by the Jiangsu Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation Department in accordance with “The Approval of Share Transfer of and Amendment of the Articles of Association of Jiangsu Chang San Jiao Chemical Co., Ltd.” issued by the same authority.

On April 29, 2011, Mr. Yu Lan transferred to each of Mr. Shen Lei and Mr. Yan Hong 112 shares in Delta at a price of HK$1.00 per share. After the transfer, Delta was owned as to 9,776 shares by Mr. Yu Lan (97.76%), 112 shares by Mr. Shen Lei (1.12%) and 112 shares by Mr. Yan Hong (1.12%).

On May 26, 2011, Delta carried out a bonus share issue, whereby an additional 39,990,000 ordinary shares of Delta were allotted and issued as bonus shares at a price of HK$1.00 each to all the then shareholders of Delta at the ratio in proportion to their existing shareholding percentage, and credited as fully paid up on a capitalization of the reserve of HK$39,990,000 from the capital reserve of Delta. Subsequent to the bonus issue, Delta’s total issued and paid-up share capital increases to HK$40 million, comprising 40 million shares of HK$1.00 each. After the bonus share issue, Delta was owned as to 39,104,000 shares by Mr. Yu Lan (97.76%), 448,000 shares by Mr. Shen Lei (1.12%) and 448,000 shares by Mr. Yan Hong (1.12%). On December 12, 2011, Mr. Yu Lan transferred all of his 39,104,000 shares in Delta to Mr. Chao Xin at a total consideration of HK$67,102,464.

Delta entered into a series of Securities Purchase Agreements dated January 31, 2011, May 16, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively, with the funds managed by Korea Investment Partners Co. Ltd. and Kleiner, Perkins, Caufield & Byers (the “Noteholders”), pursuant to which it has issued convertible notes (“Convertible Notes”) for an aggregate principal amount of US$18 million. The Convertible Notes have a compound interest rate of 6.00% per annum if converted into shares and a compound interest rate at maturity of 15.00% if redeemed or liquidated. The principal and interests accrued on such Convertible Notes are convertible in whole or in part into the ordinary shares in Delta, on such terms and subject to the conditions of the Securities Purchase Agreements. On September 13, 2014 each of Mr. Chao Xin, Mr. Shen Lei and Mr. Yan Hong transferred all of their respective shareholdings in Delta to Elite. Elite became the sole shareholder of Delta after the transfer.

On September 15, 2014, Delta entered into a Settlement Deed with the Noteholders pursuant to which all of the outstanding obligations under Convertible Notes were settled. Pursuant to the Settlement Deed, Delta agreed to (i) cause Elite to issue an aggregate of 10,605 Elite Shares in consideration for the forgiveness of an aggregate of $3,400,000 of the Convertible Notes due to the Noteholders, and (ii) cause Master Kingdom Holdings Ltd., a British Virgin Islands company (“Master Kingdom”), which is owned 100% by Mr. Chao Xin, the principal shareholder of Elite, to enter into a Novation Deed with each of the Noteholders with respect to the repayment of the balance of the Convertible Notes to the Noteholders. Accordingly, on September 18, 2014, Delta, Master Kingdom and the Noteholders entered in a Novation Deed pursuant to which Master Kingdom agreed to assume and repay the remaining indebtedness due to the Noteholders in the aggregate amount of $19,322,981.28. As a result of the foregoing, Delta has no more Convertible Notes outstanding.

On August 18, 2012, Zhengxin International and Jiangsu Delta entered into a sale and purchase agreement, pursuant to which the entire equity interest of Jiangsu Zhengxin New Material R&D Co., Limited (“Jiangsu Zhengxin R&D”) was acquired by Jiangsu Delta from Zhengxin International at a consideration of RMB3.3 million. The acquisition of Jiangsu Zhengxin R&D was approved by the Danyang Bureau of Commerce on September 18, 2012 in accordance with “The Approval and Transfer of and the Alteration of Nature of Zhengxin New Material R&D Co., Limited”.

On December 17, 2013, Jiangsu Delta Logistics Co., Ltd (“Jiangsu Logistics”) was established by Jiangsu Detla with an initial registered capital of RMB 10 million located in Dantu District, Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province, PRC.

On June 8, 2013, Binhai Deda Chemical Co., Ltd (“Binhai Deda”) was established by Jiangsu Detla with an initial registered capital of RMB 5 million located in Binhai County, Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province, PRC.

By June 30, 2014, Delta had established a domestic sales network which covered Jiangsu Province, Anhui Province, Zhengjiang Province, Hubei Province, Guangdong Province and Chongqing Metropolitan with the number of its customers increased to approximately 380. With the expansion in its operations, Delta also increased its headcount to approximately 300 employees.

Elite Ride Limited

Elite owns 100% of the ordinary shares of Delta and was formed solely in contemplation of the Acquisition. It has not commenced any operations, has only nominal assets and has no liabilities or contingent liabilities, nor any outstanding commitments other than as set forth herein. Elite has not incurred any obligations, engaged in any business activities or entered into any agreements or arrangements with any third parties other than as set forth herein. Its principal executive offices are located at 16 Kaifa Avenue, Danyang, Zhenjiang, China, and its telephone number is +86 511-8673-3102.

Corporate Structure

The diagram below illustrates Delta’s corporate structure as of the date of this report:

Business Overview

Headquartered in Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province, Delta is a fast-growing fine and specialty chemical manufacturer, primarily engaged in manufacturing and selling of organic compound including para-chlorotoluene (“PCT”), ortho-chlorotoluene (“OCT”), PCT/OCT downstream products, unsaturated polyester resin (“UPR”), maleic acid (“MA”) and other by-product chemicals and distributing fine and specialty chemicals to end application markets including Automotive, Pharmaceutical, Agrochemical, Dye & Pigments, Aerospace, Ceramics, Coating-Printing, Clean Energy and Food Additives.

Delta collaborates with reputable universities, such as the East China Normal University in order to secure its position as a market leader. Delta also closely monitors the market for development, trends and technological innovations and solicit customer feedback so as to keep abreast with market demands and industrial development.

As at the date of this report, Delta has a diversified clientele with more than 380 customers based either in domestic or overseas market. Approximately 90% of its sales are to its domestic customers based in Jiangsu Province, Anhui Province, Zhejiang Province, Hubei Province, Guangdong Province and Chongqing Metropolitan, and the rest of its products are exported via distributors or trading companies to countries outside the PRC which include but not limited to India, Brazil, Japan, European Union member countries and America.

Delta’s revenue for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014 were approximately $95.6, $124.2 and $175.3 million, respectively, and its profit before tax for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014 were $14.9, $15.8, and $9.4 million, respectively.

Products

Delta’s products can be broadly divided into two major series, namely (i) PCT/OCT and (ii) UPR, which account for approximately 40% and 27% respectively of its total revenue in the fiscal year 2014. PCT/OCT together with its downstream products can be widely used in pharmaceuticals, pesticides, dyes and consumables manufacturing industries, whereas UPR is commonly used as (i) renovation materials for bathroom and kitchen, (ii) manufacturing materials for trains, cars, aircrafts and vessels, and (iii) infrastructure materials such as anti-collusion pipes and oil and gas pipelines. UPR is a light weight, relatively wear resistant and highly anti-corrosive material, and its unique features make it a popular replacement material for plastic and steel. In the fiscal year 2013, Delta sold approximately 40% of the PCT/OCT Delta produced and Delta consumed the balance as raw materials for the manufacturing of PCT/OCT downstream products .

In addition, Delta manufactures MA, which is an intermediate product in producing UPR. Delta consumes most of the MA it produces as a production intermediary. A by-product of the production process of MA is heat energy, which Delta consumes efficiently for manufacturing its PCT/OCT products, where large-scale heat energy is required.

Delta places great emphasis on the research and development of its products to ensure Delta’s continued success. As of the date of this report, Delta has successfully registered five patents in the PRC in relation to UPR production technologies, and PCT/OCT production technology, and environmental protection equipment technology, and it is also in the process of applying for seven more patents in relation to PCT/OCT and MA productions technologies and production of PCT/OCT environmental protection equipment.

Production Process

Delta primarily engages in manufacturing and sale of organic compound including PCT, OCT, UPR, MA and other by-product chemicals. Please see below the production flow diagrams for more details on how PCT/OCT, MA and UPR products are manufactured by it.

The business operations model begins with the sourcing of raw materials, which are then delivered to Delta and stored in its warehouses until being processed in-house in its factory:

Delta Supply Chain Management (SCM)

The following diagram illustrates our business model with detailed service proposals in our Supply Chain Management business:

We started the servicing of third party clients in raw material procurement and trading in 2012, with an objective to expand our operations beyond being a conventional manufacturer. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014 our revenue were approximately $135,000, $11 Million and $49 Million and our gross profit (loss) from $20,703, $(659,199) and $(330,982).

In 2013, Jiangsu Delta Logistics Ltd, a wholly-owned subsidiary with business approval in handling dangerous and toxic chemicals was founded, marking our launch of logistics and transportation services.

We have gathered from operating this new business that we shall make good use of our knowledge and experiences in manufacturing, logistics and international trade in the chemical business to act as a service provider in supply chain management for third-party clientele including manufacturers, distributors and retailers of chemical products. We have recently added a business division handling Internet financing to deploy the opportunities in supply chain financing.

Purchase of Raw Materials

The major raw materials which Delta purchases include: Toluene, Chlorine, Benzene, Styrene and Phthalic Anhydride. Toluene and Chlorine are the two major raw materials for the PCT/OCT production. Benzene is the major raw material for MA production. Styrene and Phthalic anhydride are the two major raw materials for UPR production.

Delta sources its raw materials from a spread of proximate suppliers, and use its own PCT/OCT and MA production as raw materials for PCT/OCT downstream products and UPR products. Most of its suppliers are located within the Yangtze River Delta region, and due to the hazardous nature of the raw materials, Delta emphasises on the need for a short transportation time and the safety requirements.

PCT/OCT raw materials take about one week for delivery on request, while MA raw materials take about three to five days, and UPR raw materials take about seven to ten days.

Delivery and Storage

About 90% of the raw materials Delta uses are delivered to it by the suppliers (Delta picks up the other 10%), which buy insurance and bear all risks until goods are delivered to its warehouses, and the remainder is picked up by its employees.

Delta has on-site warehousing capacity, which allows it to store up to 6,000 tonnes of liquid or solid chemical materials.

The newly incorporated Jiangsu Logistics own 6 chemical products and trucks for transporting chemicals and is planning to increase its capacity to 6,000 tons.

Manufacturing and Processing

Manufacturing and processing occurs at Delta’s factory in Zhenjiang, which has an annual production capacity of 30,000 tons of PCT/OCT production and PCT/OCT downstream production, 25,000 tons of MA production and 18,000 tons of UPR production. Please see below the production flow diagrams for the various products for more details on how PCT/OCT, MA and UPR products are manufactured in its factory.

(a)          PCT/ OCT

PCT/OCT forms the basic or intermediate products from which down-stream extended products can be further manufactured. Delta’s annual capacity for PCT/OCT series are at 30,000 tons, and the factory operates at almost its maximum capacity presently. The simplified production process for the PCT/OCT products is as follows:

Step 1: Chlorination Process

Chorine and Toluene, which form the basic reactants for the production of PCT/OCT, are delivered into the Chlorination Tower for a controlled reaction to take place in the presence of various catalysts. Depending on the temperature and the types of catalyst used, the reaction will produce a mixture of crude products with a certain isomeric ratio of PCT/OCT.

The exhaust is delivered to the Chlorination Tower, cooled and condensed before being treated for safe discharge. The crude product solution is then delivered into the Distillation Tower where the products are isolated and purified.

Step 2: Fractional Distillation

Within the Distillation Tower, the crude reactant product undergoes separation by way of fractional distillation and PCT and OCT are segregated based on their different boiling points, and separately delivered to a PCT Tower and an OCT Tower for storage or packaging as necessary.

Step 3: Further Processing

The isolated, purified compounds can then undergo further value-added treatment pursuant to customised treatments to manufacture down-stream derivative products. Delta re-processes about 40% of the PCT/OCT products received through the manufacturing process into some 13 different downstream chemical products such as:

(1) 2,4-Dichloro toluene (“2,4DCT”) 2,4

(2) 3,4-Dichloro toluene (“3,4DCT”) 3,4

(3) O-chlorobenzaldehyde

(4) p-chlorobenzaldehyde

(5) 2,4-Dichlorobenzaldehyde 2,4

(6) O-chlorobenzyl chloride

(7) Chlorobenzyl chloride

(8) 2,4-Dichloro-chloride 2,4

(9) O-chlorobenzoic acid

(10) O-Chloro benzonitrile

(11) Chlorobenzonitrile

(12) 2,4-Dichlorobenzonitrile 2,4

(13) 3,4-Dichlorobenzonitrile 3,4

(b)          UPR

Delta’s UPR products are high-end resin products. Due to UPR’s combination of unique strengths such as its lightness, toughness, durability, strength and anti-corrosive properties, it is widely used by various industries, like the construction industry, industrial equipment industry, transport industry and the infrastructure industry. Delta’s production capacity for UPR was expanded from 9,000 tonnes in May 2010, to 18,000 tonnes annually in December 2010, and the factory operates at almost its maximum capacity presently. The simplified production process for the UPR products is as follows:

Step 1: Reaction

Di-ols and Di-acids, including MA, are the basic reactants for the production of UPR, which is a form of polyester. The reactants are delivered from their storage tanks into a stainless steel reactor for a controlled esterification process in the presence of various catalysts. Depending on the temperature and the types of catalyst used, the reaction will produce a crude mixture of semi-finished product or resin. Delta can customise the qualities and characteristics of the UPR by varying the temperature, ratio and types of chemical reactants or catalysts, which will result in the production of polyesters of different structures.

Step 2: Dilution and Further Procession

The semi-finished product or resin is transported into the Dilution Tank where Styrene and other chemicals are added in a dilution process. The Dilution Tank is linked to a cooling and condensation mechanism which will condense the vapours or exhaust from the Dilution Tank. In the Dilution Tank, the resin can be further adjusted as to viscosity, reactivity and other characteristics through the addition of chemical inhibitors or promoters.

Step 3: Packaging

The final product is then transferred to the storage tanks or sent for packaging.

(c)          MA

MA accounts for 6% of Delta’s total sales volume. Most of the MA produced, i.e. approximately 60%, is used for its own production of UPR, while about 40% will be sold to customers. The oxidation process in the production of MA produces heat which is converted into steam for use in the production of PCT/ OCT and other production areas where steam is needed.

Step 1: Oxidation

Benzene and air are catalysed and oxidised through a fixed bed Oxidation Reactor to generate MA vapour. The MA vapour is condensed and cooled to form MA in liquid form which is delivered to the Crude Anhydride Tank. The vapour is passed through the Absorption Tower for further extraction and isolation.

Step 2: Distillation

The MA solution and vapour which has been absorbed in the absorption tower shall be dissolved and distilled as part of the purification process to extract the finished product. The MA can be delivered to the storage tanks and packaged for sale, or be utilised for further production and processing.

Delivery or Pick-up by the Customers

Delta delivers around 60% of the products sold to the customer sites while customers pick up about 40% of the finished products directly from its warehouses. Delta usually uses three transportation companies to truck the products to its customer sites. The newly incorporated Jiangsu Logistics will be responsible for transporting the chemicals. Delivery typically takes up to one week, although actual time will vary depending on the location of its customers.

Production Facilities, Capacity and Utilisation

Delta’s production facilities are located in Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province, the PRC.

Delta has three main production lines centred on its core products:

Delta may from time to time look into further expansion of its existing facilities to improve output capacity.

Quality Control

Delta is committed to providing its customers with quality and reliable products. Through its corporate quality management system, Delta is committed to ensuring that the products it produces are of high quality and are able to meet the expectations of its customers.

Delta’s quality assurance department is currently comprised of 13 quality assurance personnel. They are responsible for overall quality control at every stage of its production process and ensure that it is in accordance with its quality control guidelines.

Quality Assurance and Safety Processes

Delta conducts quality checks on all the products manufactured and oversee the implementation of the quality controls at every stage of its production process in line with its quality management system. The following quality control procedures have been implemented:

(a)          Establishment of quality control standards

For manufacturing of chemical systems and components and catalysts, Delta has set in place stringent quality control standards to implement strict measures for quality control in the manufacturing. Such standards follow strictly in accordance with the national and industry standards as well as the standards and guidance set in accordance with the ISO 9001 Quality System. Delta also takes into account customers’ specifications and requirements and quality feedback from its previous customers to supplement its quality control standards.

For its system design, Delta ensures the design of every project is carried out in line with (i) the relevant PRC laws and regulations; (ii) the relevant technical specifications and industry standards; and (iii) its customers’ requirements.

(b)          Quality control during procurement

Direct materials are purchased only from pre-selected suppliers after evaluation and testing by its procurement personnel, quality control personnel and production personnel based on stringent selection criteria such as quality of their raw materials and services, material sources, pricing, accreditations, track record, financial condition and market reputation.

Delta’s quality assurance department will conduct random sample inspection upon receipt of the raw materials. Raw materials that do not meet its quality requirements are returned to the suppliers for them to remedy the problems or defects or for exchange. Procurement plans from the various suppliers are subject to review by its senior management on an annual basis .

(c)          Quality control during manufacturing process

Quality guidelines are provided to the relevant production workers at each production stage before production commences.

Before the production, incoming direct materials are inspected by way of sampling by its quality control personnel to ensure that they are supplied by approved suppliers, and that the quality, grade and quantity of such direct materials conform to its specifications and requirements as well as its quality control standards. Direct materials which fail to comply with these specifications will be rejected.

Delta continuously monitors its manufacturing process and carry out sample-testing at systematic intervals throughout the process to ensure consistency in the quality of the chemical systems and components and catalysts. Delta’s quality control personnel and production personnel conduct sample-testing and inspections at the various stages of production to ensure that defective semi-completed products do not proceed to the next stage of the production.

(d)          Quality control on finished products

Delta conducts overall inspections and testing on finished products before they are despatched to customers. Delta has implemented a strict sample-based testing system, which is carried out every batch of its finished products before they are arranged for packing. For OCT/PCT and MA products, the main criterion to be examined is its degree of purity, whereas for UPR products, the focus is on its shock-resistance and chromaticity. This final stage of inspection is carried out to ensure that the finished products that are packed and delivered conform to the exact specifications of its customers. Delta also provides after sales servicing, and will attend to complaints, if any, regarding defects in the products or the services.

To continually improve its quality management system, Delta will take into account the feedbacks from its employees who are involved in each of the quality control processes and feedbacks from these employees or its customers.

Certification and Awards

In recognition of its quality assurance efforts, Delta was awarded certification of GB/T19001-2008 idt ISO9001:2008 (quality management systems) by China Federation of Logistics Certification Center GB/T24001-2004/ISO14001:2004 (environmental management systems) by China Certification Centre Inc.

For the last three fiscal years and up to the date of this report, Delta has not experienced any material claims from its customers for defective or poor quality products, nor has Delta experienced any product liability claims from end users of its products. In addition, Delta has not experienced significant amount of return cases for its products over the same period.

Research and Development

Delta places great emphasis on research and development. Its research and development team is headed by its Chief Engineer Mr. Yuan Huaizhou and supported by about 36 research and development staff. Delta’s research team members are required to have at least five (5) years of experience in the research of fine chemical industry as well as a bachelor degree in Chemistry or chemical engineering or other relevant professional qualifications. All the employees under its research and development department are required to execute confidentiality undertakings, which restrict them from revealing any trade secrets and/or know-how with regard to its products or technologies involved in its production process to its competitors for at least three (3) years after termination of their employment.

In-house Research and development activities

Delta’s in-house research and development activities focus mainly on:

Technology Collaborations

Delta collaborates with technology partners, comprising renowned universities and in the manner as follows:

In 2012, Delta entered into discussions for partnership arrangements with a group of professors from East China Normal University to development a joint research and development centre. The joint research centre, under the name of “Delta Chemical Advanced Materials R&D Centre”, will be located in our new 12-storey office building which was completed in April 2014.

Pursuant to the collaborative arrangement, the university and its Delta Group will each contribute around three (3) to five (5) research staff to carry out the research and development operations of the joint research centre.

The joint research centre will be equipped with world-class chemical research facilities and product testing equipment. Its research focus will be placed on development of the following products:

Sales and Marketing

Delta’s sales and marketing department is headed by its Deputy General Manager, Mr Shi Weiping, who has been involved in the chemical industry since 1989 and has experience of approximately 23 years in the industry in relation to the sales and marketing of chemical products. Mr Shi is currently supported by seven sales and marketing personnel who are in charge of the sales for different product categories such as PCT/OCT and MA products and they are dedicated to sales and marketing activities in various areas, ranging from southern, northern and eastern China regions as well as overseas market.

Delta’s sales and marketing department is responsible for the sales and marketing functions of its Group, and its key roles and responsibilities include sourcing for new customers, confirming and collating orders from customers, providing after-sales service, maintaining customer relationships, and ensuring timely payments and delivery of goods/services.

Delta’s sales personnel keep in touch with its customers by paying regular visits to them to understand their needs, business development and market policies and to obtain their feedback and suggestions. Following the customer visits, its sales personnel will report to Mr Shi on a daily basis.

Delta’s sales and marketing department is also tasked with formulating and planning its marketing strategies and activities which primarily include the following specific marketing activities:

Direct sales and marketing

Direct sales and marketing activities involve regular meetings with and frequent visits to new and existing customers. Through such interactions, Delta is able to promote its products, obtain feedback on its products, and understand its customers’ demands based on the latest developments and trends relating to its chemical industry. In addition, Delta may engage in discussions with its customers relating to new chemical products in the market and to explore opportunities for business collaboration. This will allow it to better understand and serve its customers.

Further, Delta sales and marketing department cooperates with other departments to put in place an effective and systematic procedure for direct sales, arrange promotional activities and to collate customer data and feedback. Delta provides its sales and marketing employees with necessary training to familiarize them with the sales and marketing practice in the industry and how to promote awareness for its brand. These employees are also rewarded with incentive remuneration package linked to their sales performance.

Advertisements, Publications and Participation in Industrial Conferences

Delta has a diversified customer base with more than 380 customers in China and countries such as India, Brazil, Japan, European Union member countries and America. Due to its diversified clientele, its sales and marketing efforts are conducted through a variety of channels, including but not limited to websites, billboards and brochures. Delta also participated in various regional and international seminars and exhibitions to showcase and promote its products, create and enhance market awareness of its brand and products, gain market updates and industry knowledge, establish networks with customers and suppliers, keep abreast of the latest technology and identify latest trends. Delta has annually, since its establishment, participated in related industrial conferences held in the PRC, such as China International Pharmaceuticals Exhibition, China International Fine Chemicals Exhibition and China Import and Export Fair.

Awards and Certificates

As an endorsement of the quality of its products and services, Delta has been conferred, inter alia , the following awards or certificates:

Intellectual Property

Patents

As at the Latest Practicable Date, the status of Delta’s patents and the patent applications in the PRC is as follows:

Trademarks

 

As of the date of this report, Delta does not own any registered trademark. However, Delta has filed applications to the PRC Trademark Bureau in respect of the following trademarks:

 

Trademark		Class (1)		Application Number		Date of Application		Status		Place of Registration
		1		12218845		March 5, 2013		Pending		The PRC
		1		12218774		March 5, 2013		Pending		The PRC

Seasonality

Delta generally does not experience any seasonality in its business. Delta only experiences a slight decrease in the number of orders for its products during festive seasons, in particular, the Chinese New Year, as many of the factories of its customers may be closed.

Staff Training

Delta recognises that its employees are an important resource and it thus aim to equip its staff with the relevant skills and knowledge which will enable them to perform their jobs effectively. Delta has implemented comprehensive training policies and programmes aimed specifically at improving the skill sets of its staff and increasing its competitiveness and productivity. Delta’s human resource department oversees its staff training programmes.

Delta conducts training programs for all levels of its staff, including those holding management and supervisory positions. In recognition of staff with potential, Delta also conducts training programmes to upgrade their skills. Such upgrading programs are conducted on a periodic basis and tailored in accordance with the specific requirements of each department. Delta’s internal training programs include:

Delta conducts orientation programs for its new employees during which they are provided with information on it, including its history, enterprise culture, business concept and employment rules. They are required to undergo operational training sessions so as to familiarise themselves with its operational procedures, policies and practices.

Occasionally, Delta will invite external professionals or instructors to conduct seminars and talks for employees and management of relevant departments in relation to their respective scope of work.

Delta’s staff involved in the manufacturing and production processes are required to undergo in-house operational training sessions so as to familiarize themselves with its operational procedures, policies and practices. The production managers and engineers at its production facility periodically update and educate its production staff on matters relating to its production techniques and processes, including compliance with the assurance procedures required under GB/T19001-2008 idt ISO9001:2008 (quality management systems) and other environmental management and quality assurance procedures such as the GB/T24001-2004/ISO14001:2004 requirements.

Upon completion of the various training programs, Delta’s staff will sit for examinations which may be conducted orally or by written tests. For new employees, upon passing the examinations and tests, they will undergo on-the-job training during which they will learn the specific skills which are relevant for their respective positions. They will only commence work in their respective positions if they have been assessed to be fit for deployment.

Delta’s sales and marketing staff were trained on information relating to its products, including, inter alia , its products’ qualities, characteristics and their applications. They are also constantly updated on market information and market demand of its products.

Delta recognises the importance of training its staff and developing their skills, as its success is largely dependent on the quality and skills of its staff. It is its policy to maintain a competent work force and Delta is committed to providing training to its staff, in order for it to remain competitive and meet the increasing market demand for high quality products. As its staff training is mainly conducted in-house, its training expenses in the last three fiscal years have not been significant.

Insurance

Delta has in place the following insurance policies:

Delta has in place social insurance for employees of Jiangsu Delta, including fundamental pension insurance and fundamental medical insurance, unemployment insurance, work-related insurance and maternity insurance in respect of which the insurance premium is borne by its Delta Group and the employees in a specific proportion governed by the relevant PRC regulations.

Jiangsu Delta has obtained the Social Insurance Registration Certificate issued by the Social Labor Insurance Fund Management Centre of Dantu, Zhenjiang on June 23, 2010 with the effective labor period of 5 years. Jiangsu Delta has passed the annual inspection of 2011.

According to the relevant PRC laws and local regulations in respect of social insurance contribution, Jiangsu Delta pays social insurance premiums for employees according to the following rate:

To its best knowledge, each of Jiangsu Delta and Jiangsu Zhengxin R&D has since its establishment handled the fundamental medical insurance, fundamental pension insurance, unemployment insurance, work-related Injury insurance and maternity insurance for employees according to relevant laws and regulations in the PRC, and neither company has any overdue payment and had been in compliance with applicable PRC social insurance laws and regulations as of the date of this report.

Delta has all property all-risks insurance for its machinery and equipment including machineries, and facilities against damage caused by certain accidents and natural disasters such as fire.

Delta purchases and maintains compulsory traffic accident liability insurance for all company-owned motor vehicles.

Delta also purchases insurance for employer’s liability.

All insurance coverage is obtained at market rates from independent insurance companies.

Major Suppliers

The key components and raw materials used in Delta’s production and manufacturing processes are comprised mainly of Toluene, Chlorine, Benzene, Styrene and Phthalic Anhydride, Maleic Anhydride, Propylene glycol and Ethylene diglycol which in the aggregate constituted approximately 85% of its total cost of sales.

Delta’s suppliers are carefully selected by its purchasing department, and are assessed on criteria such as the geographical location, quality of materials supplied, length of business relationship with it, as well as their reputation, pricing, reliability, track record, service, punctuality and response time. To facilitate timely purchases of materials, Delta keeps a list of qualified suppliers who have demonstrated reliability in product quality and delivery time as well as pricing competiveness. This list is subject to review by its management on an annual basis.

Delta’s raw materials are currently sourced from within the PRC and therefore, all of its purchases are transacted in RMB. Accordingly, Delta is not subjected to any significant risk in exchange rates fluctuation in the purchase of raw materials.

Except for Chemical Sales Eastern China Branch of China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation, with whom a one year contract was entered into, Delta does not any have long-term arrangements with its other major suppliers.

The major suppliers accounting for 5% or more of Delta’s cost of sales for each the last three fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014 are as follows:

Most of materials are mass chemical products, prices of which are quite transparent. However, due to limited purchase volume, Delta is not able to buy products directly through major international chemical suppliers, such as SK Chemicals. Except for Sinopec, Delta procures its materials through chemical wholesalers, such as Southern Petrochemical Group. Delta may switch its suppliers from one to another depending on the commercial terms agreed upon. As a result, some suppliers in previous years did not further sell their products to it during recent years. The percentage of purchase is also varied from year to year.

Delta’s business or profitability is not materially dependent on any single supplier. Delta does not consider ourselves materially dependent on any single abovementioned supplier as Delta believes that there are other qualified suppliers that it is able to work with should any of these suppliers provide unacceptable or uncompetitive terms.

As of the date of this report, Delta is not aware of any information or arrangement which would lead to a cessation or termination of its relationships with any of its current major suppliers.

Major Customers

Delta’s customers are mainly from the chemical industry in the PRC. As of the date of this report, Delta has a customer base of approximately 380 different customers (of which certain customers belong to the same group of companies) across 11 provinces in the PRC.

The major customers accounting for 5% or more of Delta’s total revenue for the last three fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2013, 2014 are as follows:

Except materials sales’ customers, Delta’s customer base is diversified. For the past three fiscal years, Delta has generally reduced its reliance on each of its major customers, whose purchases as a percentage of its total revenue has shown a declining trend. This is a result of increased sales volume to a more diversified customer base and an increase in the number of products Delta produces.

As at the date of this report, Delta does not have any long-term arrangement or arrangements with any of its major customers and its business or profitability is not materially dependent on any single customer. As of the date of this report, Delta is not aware of any information or arrangement which would lead to a cessation or termination of its relationships with any of its current major customers.

Competition

Although the barriers to entry in this industry are relatively high in terms of capital investment and the manufacturing expertise required, Delta operates in a competitive environment. Delta’s competitors are located in the Yangtze River Delta region of China, especially in the Jiangsu Province where Delta is located.

Management of Delta believes that the demand for its products is increasing, both within and outside the PRC. Management of Delta considers, amongst others, the following to be its main competitors as Delta competes with them in at least one of the categories of the products sold by it:

Delta believes that improving its production efficiency and seizing market opportunities will consolidate its market position and market share in the industry. Delta believes that its record for quality products and reputation for good service have gained the confidence of its customers.

Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibilities

Delta has always been committed to adopting an environmentally friendly business model.

Delta has obtained all of the environmental permits and approvals necessary to conduct its business, including those for its production facilities, such as Dangerous Chemical Operation Permit, Pollutant Discharge Permit, etc. In addition, Delta was granted an Environmental Management System Certificate by China Certification Centre Inc. on July 6, 2012 which certifies that the environmental management system adopted by Jiangsu Delta during its manufacturing process is in line with the standards of GB/T24001-2004/ISO 14001:2004.

Apart from complying with all the relevant environmental laws and regulations, Delta has gone a step further in order to minimize its impact on the environment by undertaking a wide range of self-initiated measures to build a greener future.

Delta’s manufacturing processes generate noise, waste water, gaseous wastes and other industrial wastes. However, Delta has devoted efforts to reduce such wastes to acceptable levels under applicable regulations. Delta has installed various types of anti-pollution equipment in its facilities to reduce, treat, and where feasible, recycle the waste generated in its manufacturing process. Delta’s operations are subject to regulation and periodic monitoring by local environmental protection authorities. Delta is currently in compliance with all applicable environmental laws and have not breached any applicable environmental laws or regulations since its establishment.

Delta’s current water treatment system has been awarded pioneer status with regard to the water treatment technology applied in its industry in the PRC. Delta’s system allows it to recycle almost the entire portion of the waste water produced in its production, resulting in significant cost savings in its utilities expenses and also improved its environmental friendliness through a reduction in waste water production and disposal.

As a testimony to its continued efforts to achieve zero-pollution, Delta have a dedicated team of in-house researchers engaging in research and development activities focusing mainly on, inter alia, making full use of the by-products such as waste water generated during its production process to attain the goal of zero waste generation.

In order to ensure that Delta comply with the relevant PRC environmental laws and regulations, Delta has appointed specialized personnel to oversee environmental protection related matters within the Company. As a responsible corporate entity, Delta has committed to ensure that Delta complies with all the applicable PRC environmental laws and regulations in the future by (i) providing regular training upon the promulgation of new environmental laws and regulations with respect to the latest PRC environmental laws and regulations and encouraging its team staff to attend environmental protection training sessions organized by the local environmental protection authorities, (ii) conducting on-site inspections regularly, (iii) providing relevant training to its employees regarding compliance with PRC environmental laws and regulations in general, (iv) providing timely reports to the directors any incident or non-compliance with the relevant PRC environmental laws and regulations and (v) providing timely reports to and coordinating with competent authorities in the case that any incident or non-compliance arises.

Licences, Permits and Government Regulations

PRC Laws and Regulations Relating to Delta’s Business

Generally, the fine chemical industry is subject to stringent environmental protection, health and safety laws and regulation in the PRC. Delta has identified the main laws and regulations that affect its operations and the relevant regulatory bodies.

PRC Legal System

The PRC legal system is based on the PRC Constitution and is made up of written laws, regulations and directives. Decided court cases do not constitute binding precedents.

The National People’s Congress of the PRC (“NPC”) and the Standing Committee of the NPC are empowered by the PRC Constitution to exercise the legislative power of the state. The NPC has the power to amend the PRC Constitution and to enact and amend primary laws governing the state organs and civil and criminal matters. The Standing Committee of the NPC is empowered to interpret, enact and amend laws other than those required to be enacted by the NPC.

The State Council of the PRC is the highest organ of state administration and has the power to enact administrative rules and regulations. Ministries and commissions under the State Council of the PRC are also vested with the power to issue orders, directives and regulations within the jurisdiction of their respective departments. Administrative rules, regulations, directives and orders promulgated by the State Council and its ministries and commissions must not be in conflict with the PRC Constitution or the national laws and, in the event that any conflict arises, the Standing Committee of the NPC has the power to annul such administrative rules, regulations, directives and orders.

At the regional level, the people’s congresses of provinces and municipalities and their standing committees may enact local rules and regulations and the people’s government may promulgate administrative rules and directives applicable to their own administrative area. These local laws and regulations may not be in conflict with the PRC Constitution, any national laws or any administrative rules and regulations promulgated by the State Council.

Rules, regulations or directives may be enacted or issued at the provincial or municipal level or by the State Council of the PRC or its ministries and commissions in the first instance for experimental purposes. After sufficient experience has been gained, the State Council may submit legislative proposals to be considered by the NPC or the Standing Committee of the NPC for enactment at the national level.

The power to interpret laws is vested by the PRC Constitution in the Standing Committee of the NPC. According to the Decision of the Standing Committee of the NPC Regarding the Strengthening of Interpretation of Laws passed on 10 June 1981, the Supreme People’s Court has the power to give general interpretation on application of laws in judicial proceedings apart from its power to issue specific interpretation in specific cases. The State Council and its ministries and commissions are also vested with the power to give interpretation of the rules and regulations which they promulgated. At the regional level, the power to give interpretation of regional laws is vested in the regional legislative and administration organs which promulgate such laws. All such interpretations carry legal effect.

Judicial System

The People’s Courts are the judicial organs of the PRC. Under the PRC Constitution and the Law of Organization of the People’s Courts of the PRC, the People’s Courts comprise the Supreme People’s Court, the local people’s courts, military courts and other special people’s courts. The local people’s courts are divided into three levels, namely, the basic people’s courts, intermediate people’s courts and higher people’s courts. The basic people’s courts are divided into civil, criminal and administrative divisions. The intermediate people’s courts have divisions similar to those of the basic people’s courts and, where the circumstances so warrant, may have other special divisions (such as intellectual property divisions). The judicial functions of people’s courts at lower levels are subject to supervision of people’s courts at higher levels. The people’s procuratorates also have the right to exercise legal supervision over the proceedings of people’s courts of the same and lower levels. The Supreme People’s Court is the highest judicial organ of the PRC. It supervises the administration of justice by the people’s courts of all levels.

The people’s courts adopt a two-tier final appeal system. A party may before the taking effect of a judgment or order appeal against the judgment or order of the first instance of a local people’s court to the people’s court at the next higher level. Judgments or orders of the second instance of the same level and at the next higher level are final and binding. Judgments or orders of the first instance of the Supreme People’s Court are also final and binding if no appeals are made before they take effect. If, however, the Supreme People’s Court or a people’s court at a higher level finds an error in a final and binding judgment which has taken effect in any people’s court at a lower level, or the presiding judge of a people’s court finds an error in a final and binding judgment which has taken effect in the court over which he presides, a retrial of the case may be conducted according to the judicial supervision procedures.

The PRC civil procedures are governed by the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (the “Civil Procedure Law”) adopted on 9 April 1991 and amended on 28 October 2007. and 31 August 2012 The Civil Procedure Law contains regulations on the institution of a civil action, the jurisdiction of the people’s courts, the procedures in conducting a civil action, trial procedures and procedures for the enforcement of a civil judgment or order. All parties to a civil action conducted within the territory of the PRC must comply with the Civil Procedure Law. A civil case is generally heard by a court located in the defendant’s place of domicile. The jurisdiction may also be selected by express agreement by the parties to a contract provided that the jurisdiction of the people’s court selected has some actual connection with the dispute, that is to say, the plaintiff or the defendant is located or domiciled, or the contract was executed or implemented in the jurisdiction selected, or the subject-matter of the proceedings is located in the jurisdiction selected. A foreign national or foreign enterprise is accorded the same litigation rights and obligations as a citizen or legal person of the PRC. If any party to a civil action refuses to comply with a judgment or order made by a people’s court or an award made by an arbitration body in the PRC, the aggrieved party may apply to the people’s court to enforce the judgment, order or award. The time limit on the right to apply for such enforcement is two years.

A party seeking to enforce a judgment or order of a people’s court against a party who or whose property is not within the PRC may apply to a foreign court with jurisdiction over the case for recognition and enforcement of such judgment or order. A foreign judgment or ruling may also be recognised and enforced according to PRC enforcement procedures by the people’s courts in accordance with the principle of reciprocity or if there exists an international or bilateral treaty with or acceded to by the foreign country that provides for such recognition and enforcement, unless the people’s court considers that the recognition or enforcement of the judgment or ruling will violate fundamental legal principles of the PRC or its sovereignty, security or social or public interest.

Arbitration and Enforcement Of Arbitral Awards

The Arbitration Law of the PRC (the “Arbitration Law”) was promulgated by the Standing Committee of the NPC on 31 August 1994 and came into effect on 1 September 1995. It is applicable to, among other matters, trade disputes involving foreign parties where the parties have entered into a written agreement to refer the matter to arbitration before an arbitration committee constituted in accordance with the Arbitration Law. Under the Arbitration Law, an arbitration committee may, before the promulgation by the PRC Arbitration Association of arbitration regulations, formulate interim arbitration rules in accordance with the Arbitration Law and the PRC Civil Procedure Law. Where the parties have by an agreement provided arbitration as a method for dispute resolution, the parties are not permitted to institute legal proceedings in a people’s court.

Under the Arbitration Law, an arbitral award is final and binding on the parties and if a party fails to comply with an award, the other party to the award may apply to the people’s court for enforcement. A people’s court may refuse to enforce an arbitral award made by an arbitration committee if there were mistakes, an absence of material evidence or irregularities over the arbitration proceedings, or the jurisdiction or constitution of the arbitration committee.

A party seeking to enforce an arbitral award of a foreign affairs arbitration body of the PRC against a party who or whose property is not within the PRC may apply to a foreign court with jurisdiction over the case for enforcement. Similarly, an arbitral award made by a foreign arbitration body may be recognised and enforced by the PRC courts in accordance with the principles of reciprocity or any international treaty concluded or acceded to by the PRC.

In respect of contractual and non-contractual commercial-law-related disputes which are recognised as such for the purposes of the PRC laws, the PRC has acceded to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (the “New York Convention”) adopted on 10 June 1958 pursuant to a resolution of the Standing Committee of the NPC passed on 2 December 1986. The New York Convention provides that all arbitral awards made by a state which is a party to the New York Convention shall be recognised and enforced by other parties to the New York Convention subject to their right to refuse enforcement under certain circumstances including where the enforcement of the arbitral award is against the public policy of the state to which the application for enforcement is made. It was declared by the Standing Committee of the NPC at the time of the accession of the PRC that (1) the PRC would only recognise and enforce foreign arbitral awards on the principle of reciprocity; and (2) the PRC would only apply the New York Convention in disputes considered under PRC laws to be arising from contractual and non-contractual mercantile legal relations.

Foreign Exchange Control

Prior to 31 December 1993, enterprises in the PRC requiring foreign currency were required to obtain approval from the State Planning Committee and the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation before it could convert RMB into foreign currency, and such conversion had to be effected at the official rate prescribed by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”). RMB reserved by Foreign Investment Enterprises (“FIEs”) could also be converted into foreign currency at swap centres with the prior examination and verification by SAFE. The exchange rates used by swap centres were largely determined by the supply of and demand for foreign currencies and RMB.

On December 28, 1993, the People’s Bank of China (“PBOC”) announced that the dual exchange rate system for RMB against foreign currencies would be abolished with effect from January 1, 1994 and be replaced by the unified exchange rate system. Under the new system, the PBOC publishes the RMB exchange rate against the United States dollar daily. The daily exchange rate is set by reference to the RMB/US$ trading price on the previous day on the “inter-bank foreign exchange market”.

On April 1, 1996, the Foreign Exchange Control Regulations of the PRC (as amended on January 14, 1997) came into effect. On 20 June 1996, the Regulations on Sale and Purchase of and Payment in Foreign Exchange were promulgated by the People’s Bank of China and came into effect on 1 July 1996.

On October 25, 1998, the PBOC and SAFE issued a Joint Announcement on Abolishment of Foreign Exchange Swap Business which stated that from December 1, 1998, foreign exchange transactions for FIEs may only be conducted at designated banks.

On October 21, 2005, SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Relevant Issues concerning Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Residents to Engage in Financing and in Return Investment via Overseas Special Purpose Companies (“Notice 75”) which came into effect on November 1, 2005. Under Notice 75, PRC residents, including PRC Companies and PRC resident individuals, have to register their foreign investments with the local SAFE prior to incorporating or taking control of a special purpose vehicle (the “SPV”). Where a PRC resident contributes the assets or stock rights of a domestic enterprise that it owns into a SPV, or engages in capital financing abroad after contributing assets or stock rights into the SPV, it has to register such change. Other than the abovementioned registration requirement, Notice 75 also requires PRC residents to register, modify or record with the local foreign exchange authority within 30 days from the date of increase/decrease of capital, share transfer, mergers or division, change in long term equity or debt investments and guarantees in or by the SPV. In addition, the proceeds from overseas listing of the SPV shall, according to the repatriation plan submitted to the foreign exchange administration for record, be repatriated according to current regulations for the administration of foreign exchange. In addition, the foreign exchange income from profits, bonus and capital change obtained by the PRC residents from the SPV shall be repatriated within 180 days.

On August 12, 2007, SAFE promulgated the Notice on the Retaining of Foreign Exchange Earnings by Domestic Entity, which provides that from August 12, 2007, domestic entity may retain its recurrent foreign exchange earnings according to their needs for operation.

On August 1, 2008, the revised Foreign Exchange Control Regulations of the PRC was adopted by the State Council and was promulgated for implementation on August 5, 2008. In summary, taking into account the promulgation of the recent new regulations and to the extent the existing provisions stipulated in previous regulations do not contradict these new regulations, the present position under the PRC law relating to foreign exchange control are as follows:

(a)          The previous dual exchange rate system for RMB was abolished and a managed floating exchange rate system based largely on supply and demand with reference to a basket of currencies was introduced. The People’s Bank of China, will announce the closing price of foreign currencies against the RMB in the inter-bank foreign exchange market after the closing of the market on each working day, and will make it the central parity for trading against the RMB on the following working day.

(b)          Foreign exchange earnings of domestic entities may be transferred to China or held abroad according to the regulations stipulated by SAFE.

(c)          FIEs may have their own foreign currency accounts and are also permitted to retain their recurrent exchange earnings according to their needs of operation and the sums retained may be deposited into foreign exchange bank accounts maintained with designated banks.

(d)          Reservation or sale of capital account foreign exchange earnings to designated banks shall be approved by the foreign exchange control administration unless stated otherwise. Foreign exchange funds from capital account shall only be used according to the purpose approved by the foreign exchange control administration and the relevant competent authorities.

(e)          Where a foreign enterprise makes a direct investment or carries out the issuance and/or business of securities or other derivatives within the PRC, or where a domestic entity makes a direct investment or carries out the issuance and/or business of securities or other derivatives outside the PRC, it shall go through the registration procedure according to the relevant regulations stipulated by SAFE. A guarantee or a commercial loan provided to the entity outside the PRC by a domestic entity shall be subject to approval and registration with relevant foreign exchange administration. The utilisation of foreign debts by an enterprise shall be in compliance with relevant regulations and has to undergo foreign debt registration with the foreign exchange control administration.

(f)          FIEs which require foreign exchange for their ordinary trading activities such as trade services and payment of interest on foreign debts may purchase foreign exchange from designated foreign exchange banks if the application is supported by proper payment notices or supporting documents.

(g)          FIEs may require foreign exchange for the payment of dividends that are payable in foreign currencies under applicable regulations, such as distributing profits to their foreign investors. They can withdraw funds from their foreign exchange bank accounts kept with designated foreign exchange banks, subject to the due payment of tax on dividends. Where the amount of the funds in foreign exchange is insufficient, the FIE may, upon the presentation of the resolutions of the directors on the profit distribution plan and other relevant documents, purchase foreign exchange from designated foreign exchange banks.

(h)          FIEs may apply to the Bank of China or other designated foreign exchange banks to remit profit out of the PRC to the foreign parties if the requirements provided by the PRC laws, rules and regulations are met.

The Circular on Relevant Issues concerning Foreign Exchange Administration of Overseas Investment and Financing and Return Investments Conducted by Domestic Residents through Overseas Special Purpose Vehicles (“SAFE Circular No. 37”), which was promulgated by SAFE and became effective on July 14, 2014, requires a PRC individual resident (“PRC Resident”) to register with the local SAFE branch before he or she contributes assets or equity interests in an overseas special purpose vehicle (“Offshore SPV”) that is directly established or controlled by the PRC Resident for the purpose of conducting investment or financing. Following the initial registration, the PRC Resident is also required to register with the local SAFE branch for any major change in respect of the Offshore SPV, including, among other things, any major change of a PRC Resident shareholder, name or term of operation of the Offshore SPV, or any increase or reduction of the Offshore SPV’s registered capital, share transfer or swap, merger or division. Failure to comply with the registration procedures of SAFE Circular No. 37 may result in penalties and sanctions, including the imposition of restrictions on the ability of the Offshore SPV’s PRC subsidiary to distribute dividends to its overseas parent.

In addition, according to the SAFE Circular No. 37, a PRC Resident that participates in an employee share incentive plan of a non-listed Offshore SPV could, by submitting required documents, apply for registration with the local SAFE branch before exercising stock options.

Strict supervision and control by foreign exchange control administration has been imposed upon FIEs established in the manner of acquisitions of the PRC enterprises by foreign enterprises with PRC residents as shareholders.

Taxation

Income tax

The New Income Tax Law was promulgated by NPC on March 16, 2007 and came into effect on January 1, 2008. The Chinese domestic enterprises and FIEs are treated equally on the income tax rate, and the enterprise income tax rate shall be 25%. In accordance with the New Income Tax Law and its implementing regulations, the non-resident enterprise which has not set up institutions or establishments in China, or has set up institutions or establishments but the income has no relationship with such institutions or establishments, it shall pay enterprise income tax on such income sourced from China, and the income tax rate shall be 20%, subject to reduction as provided by any applicable double taxation treaty, unless the relevant income is specially exempted from tax under the applicable tax laws, regulations, notices and decisions which relate to FIEs and their investors.

The enterprises that were approved and established prior to the promulgation hereof and that, in accordance with the effective tax laws and administrative regulations, enjoy a special lower tax rate shall, in accordance with the provisions of the State Council, progressively transit to the tax rate specified herein within 5 years following the implementation hereof. Those enterprises that enjoy a fixed-term tax exemption or tax reduction shall, in accordance with the provisions of the State Council, continue to enjoy such exemption or reduction after the implementation hereof until the expiration of the term of such exemption or reduction. However, if an enterprise did not enjoy such preferential treatment because it has not yet achieved profitability, the term of such preferential treatment shall be calculated from 1 January 2008 until the expiration of the term of such exemption or reduction.

According to the Notice on Strengthening Administration of Enterprise Income Tax for Share Transfers by Non-PRC Resident Enterprise (Circular Guoshuihan [2009] No. 698) implemented on January 1, 2008, except for the purchase and sale of equity through a public securities market, where a foreign corporate investor indirectly transfers the equity of a PRC resident enterprise by disposing the equity of an overseas holding company (the “Indirect Transfer”) located in a tax jurisdiction that (i) has an effective tax rate of less than 12.5%, or (ii) does not tax its residents on their foreign income, the foreign corporate investor shall report the Indirect Transfer to the competent PRC tax authority within 30 days from the date when the equity transfer agreement was made. In this case, the PRC tax authority will examine the true nature of the Indirect Transfer. Should it deem the foreign investor to have made the Indirect Transfer without reasonable commercial purpose and in order to avoid the PRC tax, the PRC tax authority may disregard the existence of the overseas holding company that is used for tax planning purpose and re-characterise the Indirect Transfer. As a result, gains derived from such Indirect Transfer by the foreign investor may be subject to the EIT Law.

Value-added tax

Pursuant to the Provisional Regulations on Value-added Tax of PRC, last amended on November 5, 2008 and took effect from January 1, 2009, and its implementation rules which were revised on December 15, 2008 and took effect from January 1, 2009, all entities or individuals in PRC engaging in the sale of goods, the provision of processing services, repairs and replacement services, and the import of goods are required to pay value-added tax (“VAT”). The amount of VAT payable in the sale or import of goods except as otherwise provided by paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of Article 2 of the Provisional Regulations on Value-added Tax of PRC. The tax rate is also 17% for those providing processing services repairs and replacement services.

In November 2011, the Ministry of Finance (“MOF”) and the State Administration of Tax (“SAT”) promulgated the Pilot Plan for Imposition of Value-Added Tax to Replace Business Tax (the “Pilot Plan”). Since January 1, 2012, the PRC government has been implementing a pilot program in certain provinces and municipalities, to levy a 6% VAT on revenue generated from certain kinds of services in lieu of the 5% business tax. According to the Notice Regarding the Nationwide Implementation of B2V Transformation Pilot Program in respect of Transportation and Certain Modern Service Industries jointly issued by the MOF and SAT effective from August 1, 2013 (the “B2V Circular 37”), such policy has been implemented nationwide. In addition, the MOF and SAT released the Notice on Including Railway Transportation and Postal Services Sectors into the Pilot Scheme on Switching from Business Tax to VAT on December 12, 2013, which further expanded the scope of taxable services for value-added tax and replaced the B2V Circular 37 as of January 1, 2014.

Business tax

Pursuant to the Interim Regulation of the People’s Republic of China on Business Tax (“Business Tax Regulation”) last amended on November 10, 2008 and took effect from 1 January, 2009, business that provide services (including entertainment business), assign intangible assets or sell immovable property became liable to business tax at a rate ranging from 3% to 20% of the charges of the services provided, intangible assets assigned or immovable property sold, as the case may be.

Tax on dividends from PRC enterprise with foreign investment

According to the New Income Tax Law and the Implementation Rules, income such as dividends and profits distribution from the PRC derived from a foreign enterprise which has no establishment in the PRC is subject to a 10% withholding tax, subject to reduction as provided by any applicable double taxation treaty.

Stamp Duty

Under the PRC Interim Regulations on Stamp Duty promulgated by the State Council on August 6, 1988 and amended in January 6, 2011, for building property transfer instruments, including those in respect of property ownership transfer, the duty rate shall be 0.05% of the amount stated therein; for permits and certificates relating to rights, including real estate title certificates and land use right certificates, stamp duty shall be levied on an item basis at an annual rate of RMB5 per item.

Urban Maintenance Tax

Under the PRC Interim Regulations on Urban Maintenance Tax promulgated by the State Council on February 8, 1985 and amended on January 8, 2011, any taxpayer, whether an individual or otherwise, of product tax, value-added tax or business tax shall be required to pay urban maintenance tax. The tax rate shall be 7% for a taxpayer whose domicile is in an urban area, 5% for a taxpayer whose domicile is in a county and a town, and 1% for a taxpayer whose domicile is not in any urban area or county or town.

Education Surcharge

Under the Interim Provisions on Imposition of Education Surcharge promulgated by the State Council on April 28, 1986 (last amended by the State Council on August 20, 2005), any taxpayer, whether an individual or otherwise, of product tax, value-added tax or business tax shall pay an education surcharge, unless such obliged taxpayer is instead required to pay a rural area education surcharge as provided by the Notice of the State Council on Raising Funds for Schools in Rural Areas. Education surcharge shall be calculated and levied at a rate of 1% on the actual amount of product tax, value-added tax and business tax paid by the taxpayer.

According to the Circular on Issues Concerning Policies on Unifying Local Education Surtax promulgated by ministry of finance on November 17, 2010, the rate at which local education surtax is levied should be 2% of the value-added tax, the business tax or the consumption tax actually paid by entities and individuals (including foreign-invested enterprises, foreign enterprises and foreign individuals).

Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise

WFOE is governed by the Law of the People’s Republic of China Concerning Enterprises with Sole Foreign Investments, which was promulgated on April 12, 1986 and was subsequently amended on October 31, 2000, and its Implementation Regulations promulgated on December 12, 1990 and was subsequently amended on April 12, 2001 (together the “Foreign Enterprises Law”).

Procedures for establishment of a WFOE

The establishment of a WFOE will have to be approved by Ministry of Commerce (or its delegated authorities) (the “MOC”). If two or more foreign investors jointly apply for the establishment of a WFOE, a copy of the contract between the parties must also be submitted to MOC (or its delegated authorities) for its record. A WFOE must also obtain a business licence from the State Administration of Industry and Commerce (or its delegated authorities) before it can commence business.

Nature

A WFOE is a limited liability company under the Foreign Enterprise Law. It is a legal entity which may independently assume civil obligations, enjoy civil rights and has the right to own, use and dispose of property. It is required to have a registered capital contributed by the foreign investor(s). The liability of the foreign investor(s) is limited to the amount of registered capital contributed. The foreign investor may make its contributions by instalments and the registered capital must be contributed within the period as approved by the MOC (or its delegated authorities) in accordance with relevant regulations.

Profit distribution

The Foreign Enterprise Law provides that after payment of taxes, a WFOE must make contributions to a reserve fund and at least 10% of the after-tax profits must be allocated to the reserve fund. If the accumulative amount of allocated reserve funds reaches 50% of an enterprise’s registered capital, the WFOE will not be required to make any additional contribution. The WFOE is prohibited from distributing dividends unless the losses (if any) of previous years have been made up.

In accordance with the Notice of the Ministry of Finance on the Issue of Handling Financial Issues by Relevant Enterprises after the Implementation of the Company Law promulgated by the Ministry of Finance on March 15, 2006 and effective April 1, 2006, from January 1, 2006 on, enterprises established in accordance with the Company Law shall distribute profits pursuant to Article 167 of the Company Law and shall no longer make contributions to the reserve fund. After an enterprise ceases to make contributions to the reserve fund, it may continue to make contributions to the employee bonus and welfare fund as decided by the board of directors if the purpose, use conditions, and procedures thereof shall be made clear, and such funds shall be manage as debts.

Company Law

The establishment and operation of corporate entities in China is governed by the PRC Company Law, which was promulgated by the Standing Committee of the NPC on December 29, 1993 and became effective on July 1, 1994 (“1993 PRC Company Law”). It was subsequently amended on December 25, 1999, August 28, 2004, October 27, 2005 and December 28, 2013.

The PRC Company Law generally governs 2 types of companies — limited liability companies and joint stock limited companies. Both types of companies have the status of legal persons, and the liability of a company to its debtors is limited to the value of assets owned by the company. Liabilities of shareholders of a limited liability company are limited to the amount of registered capital they have contributed.

The amendments to the PRC Company Law adopted in October 2005 seek to reform various aspects of the 1993 PRC Company Law and simplify the establishment and operation of companies incorporated in China by lowering capitalisation requirements, increasing shareholder and creditor protection, improving corporate governance, and relaxing rules regarding the establishment of subsidiaries. Further, the restriction relating to the total investment of a company in other entities exceeding 50% of its net assets has been removed, the incorporation of one shareholder limited liability companies in addition to wholly State-owned enterprises is permitted, and the Chinese Company Law shall apply to foreign invested limited liability companies. Where laws on foreign investment have other stipulations, such stipulations shall apply.

The amendments to the PRC Company Law adopted in December 2013 took effect on March 1, 2014. These amendments cover three aspects: (a) replacing the paid-up capital registration system by subscribed capital registration system; (b) relaxing the requirements for registered capital registration; and (c) streamlining the registration items and requirements for registration documents.

PRC Laws and Regulations Relating to Foreign Investment

On October 31, 2007, the National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”) and MOC, jointly promulgated the Catalogue of Industries for Guiding Foreign Investment (as amended in 2007), which came into effect on December 1, 2007 (the “Catalogue”), as amended on December 24, 2011 and came into effect on January 30, 2012. The Catalogue lists out the industries and economic activities which are encouraged, restricted or prohibited by the PRC government for foreign investment. The Catalogue does not specify which business activities are in the permitted category. Instead, if the business activities are not listed in any of the encouraged, restricted or the prohibited categories, they shall be construed as being in the permitted category. Pursuant to the Catalogue, the wholesale of refined oil falls under the restricted category. None of our Group’s business activities are listed in the prohibited category.

Labor Law

Pursuant to the Labor Law of the PRC promulgated by Standing Committee of the NPC on July 5, 1994 and was subsequently amended on August 27, 2009, the Labor Contract Law of the PRC promulgated by Standing Committee of the NPC on June 29, 2007 and was subsequently amended on December 28, 2012 and the Labour Contract Law Implementation Rules of the PRC promulgated by the State Council on September 18, 2008, companies must enter into employment contracts with their employees, based on the principles of equality, consent and agreement through consultation. Companies must establish and effectively implement system of ensuring occupational safety and health, educating employees on occupational safety and health, preventing work-related accidents and reducing occupational hazards. Companies must also pay for their employees’ social insurance premium.

Social Insurance Law

Employers in China are required to contribute, on behalf of their employees, to a number of social security funds, including funds for basic pension insurance, unemployment insurance, basic medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, maternity insurance, and housing provident funds. These payments are made to local administrative authorities and an employer who fails to contribute may be fined and be ordered to make-up for the missed contributions. The various laws and regulations that govern the employers’ obligation to contribute to the social security funds include PRC Social Insurance Law promulgated by the Standing Committee of the NPC on October 28, 2010 and became effective July 1, 2011; the Interim Regulations on the Collection and Payment of Social Security Funds, which were promulgated by the State Council and became effective on January 22, 1999; the Interim Measures concerning the Maternity Insurance, which were promulgated by the Ministry of Labour on December 14, 1994 and became effective on January 1, 1995; the Regulations on Occupational Injury Insurance, which were promulgated by the State Council on April 27, 2003 and became effective on January 1, 2004 and was amended on December 20, 2010; the Regulations on Management of the Housing Provident Fund, which were promulgated and became effective on April 3, 1999 and was amended on March 24, 2002.

Where the enterprises fail to pay the full amount of the social insurance premiums, the relevant department aforesaid has the authority to check and decide on the amount of social insurance premiums that the enterprises should pay as the supplementary payment. If the enterprises does not pay for the social insurance premiums after the relevant department has charged the full amount of the supplementary payment, the relevant department is authorised to either inquire about the deposit account of such enterprises, or apply to the related department at or above the county level for making the decision of the allocation of social insurance premiums. The relevant department can also inform the bank or other financial institution to execute the allocation by written notice. If the amount of the deposit account is smaller than the amount of social insurance premiums required to pay by the enterprises, the enterprises may provide a security and delay the date to pay the social insurance premiums. If the amount of the deposit account is smaller than the amount of the social insurance premiums needed to pay by the enterprises, and the enterprises fails to provide a security, the relevant department shall apply to the court for the levying, sealing and auctioning of the property of such enterprises.

If the enterprises do not pay the full amount of social insurance premiums as scheduled, the social insurance premium collection institution shall order them to make the payment or make up the difference within a stipulated period and impose a daily fine equivalent to 0.05% of the overdue payment from the date on which the payment is overdue. If payment is not made within the stipulated period, the relevant administration department shall impose a fine from one to three times the amount of overdue payment.

Environmental Protection Regulations

In accordance with the Environmental Protection Law of the PRC adopted by the Standing Committee of the NPC on December 26, 1989, which has been amended on April 24, 2014 and will take effect on January 1, 2015, the Administration Supervisory Department of Environmental Protection of the State Council sets the national guidelines for the discharge of pollutants. The provincial and municipal governments of provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities may also set their own guidelines for the discharge of pollutants within their own provinces or districts in the event that the national guidelines are inadequate.

A company or enterprise which causes environmental pollution and discharges other polluting materials which endanger the public should implement environmental protection methods and procedures into their business operations. This may be achieved by setting up a system of accountability within the company’s business structure for environmental protection; adopting effective procedures to prevent environmental hazards such as waste gases, water and residues, dust powder, radioactive materials and noise arising from production, construction and other activities from polluting and endangering the environment. The environmental protection system and procedures should be implemented simultaneously with the commencement of and during the operation of construction, production and other activities undertaken by the company. Any company or enterprise which discharges environmental pollutants should report and register such discharge with the Administration Supervisory Department of Environmental Protection and pay any fines imposed for the discharge. A fee may also be imposed on the company for the cost of any work required to restore the environment to its original state. Companies which have cause severe pollution to the environment are required to restore the environment or remedy the effects of the pollution within a prescribed time limit.

If a company fails to report and/or register the environmental pollution caused by it, it will receive a warning or be penalized. Companies which fail to restore the environment or remedy the effects of the pollution within the prescribed time will be penalized or have their business licences terminated. Companies or enterprises which have polluted and endangered the environment must bear the responsibility for remedying the danger and effects of the pollution, as well as to compensate the any losses or damages suffered as a result of such environmental pollution.

Governmental Regulations in Relation to the Company’s Businesses

Pursuant to the Implementation Measures for Work Safety Licenses of Enterprises Producing Hazardous Chemicals (“Measures of Producing Hazardous Chemicals”) promulgated by State Administration of Work Safety on August 5, 2011 which took effect on December 1, 2011, where an enterprise is established in accordance with relevant laws and has obtained the industrial and commercial business licenses or industrial and commercial approval documents for engaging in the production of end products or intermediate products that are included in the Catalogue of Hazardous Chemicals, the enterprise shall obtain the work safety licenses for hazardous chemicals in accordance with the provisions of Measures of Producing Hazardous Chemicals. The enterprise that has not obtained the work safety licenses shall not engage in the production activities of hazardous chemicals.

Save as otherwise disclosed, Delta is not subject to any special legislation or regulatory controls in the PRC other than those generally applicable to companies and businesses in the PRC, which will have a material effect on its business operations. Changes in the PRC governmental rules and regulations will have a significant impact on its business, and Foreign exchange control and tax policies in the PRC may limit its ability to utilize its revenue effectively and affect its ability to receive dividends and other payments from its subsidiary in the PRC.

Please also refer to the Section “Risk Factors – Risks Relating to Doing Business in the PRC” of this report for details on the applicable PRC laws and regulations.

Licenses, Permits and Approvals

As of the date of this report, Delta has obtained all material licenses, permits and approvals from the relevant government authorities for its business operations in the PRC, and have complied with all relevant PRC environmental laws and regulations, and have not been fined under any related PRC environmental laws or regulations. Please see the table below for the material licenses, permits and approvals that Delta received as of the date of this report:

Employees

As of the date of this report, Delta has a total of 309 full-time employees, all of whom are located in Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, the PRC. Delta does not experience any significant seasonal fluctuations in its number of employees. The number of temporary employees employed by it during the periods under review was insignificant.

None of Delta’s employees are represented by a union. Delta believes that its relationship with its employees has historically been good and this is expected to continue.

The functional distribution of Delta’s full-time employees as of the date of this report is as follows:

RISK FACTORS

You should consider carefully each of the following business and investment risk factors and all of the other information in this report. If any of the following risks and uncertainties develops into actual events, the business, financial condition or results of Delta’s operations could be materially adversely affected. If that happens, the trading price of its ordinary shares could decline significantly. The risk factors below contain forward-looking statements regarding its business. Actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. See "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information".

Risks Relating to Delta’s Business

Delta is subject to the PRC's environmental protection measures.

Delta’s business activities produce certain pollutants such as waste water and waste gas, during the production process. The PRC has in recent years tightened its environmental protection measures to be more in line with steps taken by developed countries.

Under the PRC Environmental Protection Law, any enterprise which discharges pollutants is required to be registered with the relevant PRC governmental departments and to obtain a pollutant discharge permit. Any such enterprise is also required to have waste water, waste gas, solid waste and noise pollution treatment facilities that meet the relevant environmental standards and to have the pollutants treated before discharge. The provincial and municipal governments of provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities may also set their own guidelines for the discharge of pollutants within their own provinces or districts.

On October 20, 2012, Jiangsu Delta obtained the Pollutant Discharge Permit of Zhenjiang issued by the Environment Protection Agency of Dantu District, Zhenjiang City for discharge of the key production wastes, including inter alia , ammonia, nitrogen, totel phosphorus, petroleum waste, benzene, toluene, dimethylbenzene, chlorobenzene, soot, hydrochloric acid, hydrochloric acid, maleic anhydride and sulphur dioxide. Such discharges must be made in compliance with national environmental regulation. The Pollutant Discharge Permit is valid from October 20, 2012 to October 19, 2015, after which it will be due for renewal.

Additionally, its facilities may be subject to periodic and annual environmental inspections. Penalties may be imposed for the discharge of pollutants that fail to meet relevant environmental standards. The relevant governmental authorities may refuse to issue or renew a pollutant discharge permit if an enterprise fails environmental inspections and in cases of severe violation of environmental standards, are also empowered to shut down any enterprise that causes substantial environmental problems.

There is no assurance that the current PRC environmental protection laws and regulations will not be amended in the future. In June 2012, as the local environmental protection criteria were amended where more stringent standards were introduced by the relevant local authorities, Jiangsu Delta’s production activities were temporarily suspended for approximately 45 days to enhance its waste water treatment facilities in order to meet the revised standards. In July 2012, Jiangsu Delta was certified to have satisfied the new criteria and re-commenced its operations. If more stringent environmental protection laws and regulations are introduced in the future, incident as such might happen again and Delta may need to utilize significant financial and/or other resources to ensure compliance, which will result in an increase in its operating costs and have an adverse effect on its profitability and prospects.

Furthermore, if Delta is unable to comply with such stringent environmental protection standards, penalties (including fines and/or shutdown of processing facilities) may be imposed on it, which in turn may adversely affect its financial performance.

Delta depends on its key personnel for continued success.

Delta believes its success to date can largely be attributed to the contributions, expertise and experience of its key management team, which is headed by its Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Chao Xin. He is responsible for identifying business opportunities and implementing overall business strategies to achieve its corporate goals.

Delta’s key management team also includes Chao Xin, Wu Changguang, Xia Jianmin, Chao Ming and Yan Hong . The continued success its business is therefore dependent, to a large extent, on its ability to retain the services of its directors and executive officers. Each of Chao Xin, Wu Changguang and Chao Ming has more than 13 years of experience in the fine chemical and/or related industries. The loss of the services of its key personnel without a suitable and timely replacement, or the inability to attract and retain other qualified personnel, could adversely affect its operations and hence, its financial results.

Delta is subject to fluctuations in the prices of principal raw materials in its operations.

The key components and raw materials used in Delta’s production and manufacturing processes are Toluene, Chlorine, Benzene, Styrene and Phthalic Anhydride, Maleic Anhydride, Propylene glycol and Ethylene diglycol which in aggregate constituted approximately 80% of its total cost of sales. As these materials constitute key components of its manufacturing processes, any fluctuations in the prices of such raw materials which may in turn have an impact on its production costs. In line with industry practice, Delta do not have long-term supply contracts with its suppliers. A shortage of any key raw materials or components could limit its production, and is likely to increase the costs of its products, thereby depressing the margins for its products. Further, although Delta produces a number of intermediary materials such as MA, PCT and OCT in-house for the production of PCT/OCT downstream products and UPR products, there can be no assurance that Delta will be able to continue to do so in a cost-effective manner.

There is no assurance that Delta will be able to obtain an adequate supply of key raw materials at competitive prices. Market prices of such raw materials may also be volatile due to factors beyond its control, such factors include, inter alia , general economic conditions, changes in the level of global demand and the availability of supply. Any substantial increase in the prices of these raw materials is likely to have a material adverse impact on its production costs. In the event of any significant increase in the cost of such raw materials, and should Delta be unable to pass on such costs to its customers on a timely basis, its business, profitability and financial performance will be adversely affected.

Delta is vulnerable to fluctuations in the prices of its products.

Delta is subject to fluctuations in demand for its products and services due to a variety of factors, including general economic conditions, competition, product obsolescence, shifts in buying patterns, financial difficulties and budget constraints of its actual and potential customers and other factors. Some of its products may experience great price fluctuation.

While such factors may, in some periods, increase product sales, fluctuations in demand can also negatively impact its product sales. If demand for its products declines or the prices of its products decline because of general economic conditions or for other reasons, its revenues and gross margin could be adversely affected.

Delta may be affected by disruptions to its processing facilities.

Delta’s processing facilities are located at Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province, the PRC. The production facilities are subject to operational risks, such as industrial accidents, which could cause personal injury or loss of human life, the breakdown or failure of equipment, power supplies or processes, performance below expected levels of output or efficiency, obsolescence, labor disputes, natural disasters and the need to comply with relevant regulatory and requirements. From time to time, Delta may need to carry out planned shutdowns of its processing plants for routine maintenance, statutory inspections and testing and may need to shut down various plants for capacity expansions and equipment upgrades. In addition, due to the nature of its business, and despite compliance with requisite safety requirements and standards, the production process is still subject to operational risks, including discharges or releases of hazardous substances, exposure to contamination and leakages from other factories and operations in the vicinity. These operational risks may cause personal injury or loss of human life and could result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties. The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on the productivity and profitability of a particular production facility and on its business, results of operations and financial condition.

Although Delta has taken precautions to minimize the risk of any significant operational problems at its production facilities, there can be no assurance that its business, results of operations and financial condition may not be adversely affected by disruptions caused by operational hazards at its production facilities, or at other factories and facilities in the vicinity. Moreover, its production processes are continuously being modified and updated. As a result of manufacturing process updates and improvements, from time to time, Delta may experience shutdowns, and disruptions to the operations.

The occurrence of any of the above events may cause it to stop or suspend its processing operations and Delta may not be able to deliver the products to its customers on a timely basis, which would have an adverse impact on its business, financial position and profitability.

Delta’s insurance coverage may not adequately protect it against certain operating and other hazards which may have an adverse effect on its business.

Delta makes substantial investments in complex manufacturing and production facilities and transportation equipment. Many of the production processes, raw materials and certain finished products are potentially destructive and dangerous in uncontrolled or catastrophic circumstances, including operating hazards, fires and explosions, and natural disasters such as typhoons, floods, earthquakes and major equipment failures for which insurance may not be obtainable at a reasonable cost or at all. Delta maintains insurance policies covering losses due to fire and other calamities. Delta also maintains insurance policies for fixed assets, such as vehicles, machineries, facilities and buildings which cover against damage caused by certain accidents and natural disasters. Should an accident or natural disaster occur, it may cause significant property damage, disruption to operations and personal injuries and its insurance coverage may be inadequate to cover such loss. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, Delta could suffer from damage to its reputation or lose all or a portion of production capacity as well as future revenues anticipated to derive from the relevant facilities. While Delta maintains coverage from insurance policies for its production facilities which are in line with the industry norms, Delta cannot assure you that its insurance coverage would be sufficient to cover all its potential losses.

Delta’s profitability may be affected by a failure to compete effectively in a competitive environment.

Delta operates in a highly competitive environment and is subject to competition from both existing competitors and new market entrants. Rapid technological advances and aggressive pricing strategies by its competitors may continue to increase competition. In order to remain competitive, Delta must continue to improve its materials supply chain, foster production self-sufficiency, upgrade technology and manufacturing process and introduce new products to the market in a timely manner. Delta’s ability to do so depends on factors both within and outside of its control and may be constrained by the distinct characteristics and production requirements of individual products. There can be no assurance that Delta will be able to continue to improve production efficiency and maintain reasonable margins for all of its existing products, or that Delta will be able to successfully introduce new products that are able to command higher margins. Some of its competitors may have superior financial, marketing, manufacturing, research and development and technological resources, greater brand name recognition and larger customer bases than it.

Accordingly, these competitors may have the ability to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies, adapt more quickly to changes in customer requirements and devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sales of their products and/or services. There is no assurance that Delta will be able to continue competing successfully against present and future competitors.

Management of Delta believes that the important factors to achieving success in its industry include maintaining customer loyalty by cultivating long-term customer relationships and maintaining the quality of its products and services. If Delta is unable to attain these, Delta may lose customers to its competitors and this will adversely affect its market share. Increased competition may also force it to lower its prices, thus reducing its profit margins and affecting its financial performance and condition. Such competition may have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position and results of operations.

Delta’s business may be adversely affected if its customers place lower than expected orders.

As is customary in its industry, Delta does not obtain firm and long-term volume purchase commitments from its customers. Although Delta may from time to time enter into sales agreements with its key customers which normally include general terms of sale, specification requirements and pricing policy, such agreements generally do not specify a minimum purchase volume or a specific purchase price. The precise terms for each shipment, such as pricing, product specifications and quantities, are normally confirmed at the time each order is placed.

Accordingly, Delta faces the risk that its customers might place lower than expected orders, if at all, or cancel existing plans for orders. Although the customers might be contractually obliged to purchase products on specific terms from it for particular orders, Delta may be unable to or, for other business reasons, choose not to enforce its contractual rights if the customers terminate their orders. Cancellations, reductions or instructions to delay production by a significant customer could materially and adversely affect its results of operations by reducing its sales volume, as well as by possibly causing a delay in the customers’ repayment of its expenditures for inventory and resulting in lower utilization of the manufacturing facilities, all of which may result in lower gross margins.

Delta’s reputation may suffer if Delta fails to manufacture products within the acceptable quality range and optimal production yields.

Product quality can be affected by a number of factors, including the level of contaminants in the manufacturing environment, the contamination of raw materials, equipment malfunction, process adjustments made to manufacture new products, interruptions in availability of utilities, deficiencies in quality control and inadequate sample testing. Many of Delta’s customers require stringent quality requirements in the procurement of their supplies.

Delta has in place stringent quality control processes as set out in the section “Quality Control” of this rep and ensure that its raw materials, manufacturing systems and processes and products meet the highest standards of quality. If Delta fails to maintain high quality production standards, its reputation may suffer and customers may cancel their orders or return their products for replacement, which will materially and adversely affects its results of operations and financial condition.

Delta may be unable to adapt to technological changes and other industry standards.

Delta operates in a technologically dependent industry and is required to quickly adapt to technological changes and industry standards as well as the changing needs of customers. In the event that Delta is unable to keep up with the technological developments and develop new products on time, or if Delta fails to anticipate and adapt to changes in its customers’ requirements, its current products and technology may face the risk of becoming obsolete and Delta would not be able to fully meet its customers’ needs. This may then result in a decrease in demand for its products and have a negative impact on its financial performance.

Delta may be exposed to risk of infringement of its intellectual property rights.

Delta relies primarily on patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright law and other contractual restrictions to protect its intellectual property. Nevertheless, these afford only limited protection and the actions Delta may take to protect its intellectual property rights may not be adequate. Third parties may infringe or misappropriate its proprietary technologies or other intellectual property rights, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. As of the date of this report, Delta owns five patents in respect of UPR production and is in the midst of applying for seven more patents.

Although Delta’s senior management personnel would, under the relevant PRC laws relating to duties of directors or the terms of their employment contracts, have a general duty of confidentiality, there is no assurance that there will be no unauthorised disclosure of its trade secrets or other proprietary information. In the event that there is a leakage of such trade secrets or proprietary information to its competitors and other third parties, it may limit its ability to maintain its competitive edge and to grow its business.

Further, as Delta has not yet received patent protection for some of its proprietary information, there is no assurance that Delta will obtain adequate remedies in the event of an unauthorised disclosure of the proprietary information to its competitors or other third parties. Should there be a loss of proprietary information, its operations, financial position and prospects may be adversely affected.

Delta may not be able to ensure the successful implementation of its future plans and strategies.

As set out in the section entitled “Strategies and Future Plans”, Delta intends to, inter alia , expand its production capacity and product lines, as well as its distribution network. Such initiatives involve various risks including but not limited to the investment costs in establishing a distribution network within the PRC, setting up of new production facilities and offices and working capital requirements. There is no assurance that such future plans can be successfully implemented as the successful execution of such future plans will depend on several factors, some of which are not within its control, such as retaining and recruiting qualified and skilled staff, and the continued demand for its products by its customers. Failure to implement any part of its future plans or executing such plan costs effectively, may lead to a material adverse change in its operating environment or affect its ability to respond to market or industry changes, which may, in turn, adversely affect its business and financial results.

Delta is exposed to the credit risks of its customers.

Delta’s business and financial results are dependent on the credit worthiness of its customers and this risk increases with, inter alia , the customer’s proportion of purchases from it. Delta usually offers its customers credit terms of up to 120 days. Although there has not been any material collection problem for trade receivables or any other allowance for doubtful debts during the past three fiscal years, there is no assurance that Delta will not encounter bad debt problems in the future. Should Delta experience any unexpected delay or difficulty in collections from its customers, its cash flow and financial results may be adversely affected.

In addition, any deterioration in the financial position of its customers may materially affect its profits and cash flow as these customers may default on their payments to it. Delta cannot assure you that such defaults will not increase in the future or that Delta will not experience cash flow problems as a result of such defaults. Should these develop into actual events, its business and financial results will be adversely affected.

Delta may require additional funding for future growth.

Delta’s business and the nature of the industry in which Delta operates may require it to make substantial capital expenditures in terms of both plants, equipment and for research and development capabilities. In particular, Delta may expand its production capacity in certain of its production facilities to cater to the expected increase in demand. These capital expenditures will be spent in advance of any additional sales to be generated by new or upgraded production facilities as a result of these expenditures. There is a risk that Delta may in the future incur operating losses if its net operating revenue does not adequately recover its capital expenditures.

In connection with its business strategy, Delta has continued to make regular capital investments and expenditures. Delta expects to incur further capital expenditures for FY2015 in connection with the construction and the expansion of production facilities.

The additional funding and capital expenditures is expected to be funded from proceeds from existing cash balances and credit lines, cash inflow from operations and existing and future bank borrowing. However, in the event of adverse market conditions in the future or changes in its growth, manufacturing process, product technologies, prices of machinery and equipment or interest rates, its actual expenditures may exceed its planned expenditures and Delta may not have sufficient sources of liquidity to effect the current operational plan and would need to secure additional financing from external sources. Delta’s failure to obtain any required financing could impair its ability to both serve its existing clients base and develop new clients and could result in both a decrease in revenue and an increase in its loss.

To the extent that Delta requires financing, it would intend to seek funding for its capital needs through the issuance of debt, preferred stock, common equity, loan guarantees, or a combination of these types of instruments. Delta may also seek to obtain financing through a private placement or a public offering, a consequence of which could include the sale or issuance of stock to third parties. To the extent additional funding is required, Delta cannot assure you that it will be able to get additional financing on any terms acceptable to it, and, if it is able to raise funds, it may be necessary for it to sell its securities at a price which is at a significant discount from the market price and on other terms which may be disadvantageous to it. In connection with any such financing, Delta may be required to provide registration rights to the investors. The price and terms of any financing which would be available to it could result in the issuance of a significant number of shares. If Delta is required to issue a significant number of shares, stockholders could suffer substantial dilution.   

Delta is pendent on its “DELTA” brand.

Delta relies on its “DELTA” brand in the marketing and distribution of its products. Delta believes that it has built significant goodwill in its brand in terms of the quality of products and services and it is widely recognised by the fine chemical industry in the PRC. Delta considers its “DELTA” brand to be vital in promoting product recognition and customer loyalty. Hence, if there are any major defects in its products or adverse publicity on its brand, the goodwill in its brand will be adversely affected and its customers may lose confidence in its products. This will adversely affect its sales of products, hence affecting its business and financial performance.

In order to protect its trademark, Delta has applied to register its “DELTA” label as a trademark in the PRC. Delta relies on PRC trademark laws but there is no assurance that this means of protecting its trademark will be effective or that its competitors will not adopt product names or trademarks that are similar to that of ours. Delta is also vulnerable to attempts by third parties to pass off their products as ours by using its trademark. Adequate protection of its intellectual property is important to its business. Although Delta may take legal action against those who infringe its intellectual property rights, it may need to incur substantial time and resources and there is no assurance that Delta will be able to stop or prevent such infringement completely. Unauthorized use of its trademarks could adversely affect its performance and business reputation. Should such counterfeit products be of inferior quality, the goodwill in its brand may be eroded. Hence, its business and financial performance will be adversely affected if Delta is unable to protect its intellectual property rights effectively.

Defective or non-compliant products may lead to negative publicity which adversely affect Delta’s business and profits.

Delta’s products are sold mainly to manufacturers. Although Delta has not faced any adverse claims or complaints regarding its products to-date, there can be no assurance that its products will not cause personal injury or health complications on users. Further, in the event that its products are defective or non-compliant with specifications, Delta may be liable to complaints, lawsuits and claims from its customers which in turn could generate negative publicity and materially and adversely affect its business and financial condition. Any successful product liability claim against it may adversely affect its business and reputation. A product liability claim, even without merit, could result in it incurring significant expenses and expending substantial time and efforts of its management in defending such a claim. Even if Delta is able to successfully defend any such claim, there can be no assurance that its customers will not lose confidence in its products, thereby affecting its business and reputation.

Additional Risk Factors to consider

Because Delta’s contracts are individual purchase orders and not long-term agreements, the results of its operations can vary significantly from quarter to quarter.

Delta currently does not have any long-term contracts with its customers for its products.  While Delta does not depend on any single customer for a significant portion of its revenues, there is a risk that existing customers will elect not to do business with it in the future or will experience financial difficulties. There is also a risk that its customers will attempt to impose new or additional requirements on it that reduce the profitability of those customers for us. If Delta does not develop relationships with new customers, Delta may not be able to increase, or even maintain, its revenue, and its financial condition, results of operations, business and/or prospects may be materially adversely affected.

Potential claims alleging infringement of third party’s intellectual property by Delta could harm its ability to compete and result in significant expense to it and loss of significant rights.

From time to time, third parties may assert patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to Delta’s business. Any claims that its products or processes, whether in relation to the specific circumstances set out above or otherwise, infringe the intellectual property rights of others, regardless of the merit or resolution of such claims, could cause it to incur significant costs in responding to, defending, and resolving such claims, and may divert the efforts and attention of its management and technical personnel away from the business. As a result of such intellectual property infringement claims, Delta could be required or otherwise decide it is appropriate to pay third-party infringement claims; discontinue manufacturing, using, or selling particular products subject to infringement claims; discontinue using the technology or processes subject to infringement claims; develop other technology not subject to infringement claims, which could be time-consuming and costly or may not be possible; and/or license technology from the third-party claiming infringement, which license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could result in unexpected expenses or require it to recognize an impairment of its assets, which would reduce the value of the assets and increase expenses. In addition, if Delta alters or discontinue the production of affected items, its revenue could be negatively impacted.

Risks Relating to Doing Business in the PRC

Delta’s subsidiaries, main operations and assets are located in the PRC. Shareholders may not be accorded the same rights and protection that would be accorded under the US law. In addition, it would be difficult to enforce a U.S. judgment against its PRC subsidiaries and its officers and directors.

Delta’s PRC subsidiaries, Jiangsu Delta, Jiangsu Zhengxin R&D, Jiangsu Logistic and Binhai Deda were established in the PRC, and their main operations and assets are located in the PRC. Delta’s PRC subsidiaries, main operations and assets are therefore subject to the relevant laws and regulations of the PRC. In addition, a majority of its officers and directors are non-residents of the U.S., and substantially all their assets are located outside the U.S. As a result, it could be more difficult for investors to effect service of process in the U.S., or to enforce a judgment obtained in the U.S. against any of its PRC subsidiaries or any of these persons.

Delta’s business is subject to certain PRC laws and regulations.

Delta’s business and operations in the PRC are subject to government rules and regulations, including environmental, working safety, road transportation and health regulations. Any changes in such government regulations may have a negative impact on its business.

Breaches or non-compliance with these PRC laws and regulations may result in the suspension, withdrawal or termination of its business licenses or permits, or the imposition of penalties, by the relevant authorities. Delta’s PRC subsidiaries’ business licences are also granted for a finite period and any extension thereof is subject to the approval of the relevant authorities. Any suspension, withdrawal, termination or refusal to extend its PRC subsidiaries’ business licenses or permits would cause the cessation of production of certain or all of its products, and this would adversely affect its PRC subsidiaries’ business, financial performance and prospects.

Uncertainty in the PRC legal system may make it difficult for Delta to predict the outcome of any disputes that it may be involved in.

The PRC legal system is based on the PRC Constitution and is made up of written laws, regulations, circulars and directives. The PRC government is still in the process of developing its legal system, so as to meet the needs of investors and to encourage foreign investment. As the PRC economy is generally developing at a faster pace than its legal system, some degree of uncertainty exists in connection with whether and how existing laws and regulations will apply to certain events or circumstances.

Some of the laws and regulations, and the interpretation, implementation and enforcement thereof, are still subject to policy changes. There is no assurance that the introduction of new laws, changes to existing laws and the interpretation or application thereof or the delays in obtaining approvals from the relevant authorities will not have an adverse impact on Delta’s PRC subsidiaries’ business, financial performance and prospects.

Further, precedents on the interpretation, implementation and enforcement of the PRC laws and regulations are limited, and unlike other common law countries such as the United States, decisions on precedent cases are not binding on lower courts. As such, the outcome of dispute resolutions may not be consistent or predictable as in the other more developed jurisdictions and it may be difficult to obtain swift or equitable enforcement of the laws in the PRC, or obtain enforcement of judgment by a court of another jurisdiction.

New rules on mergers and acquisitions of domestic enterprise by foreign investors

In particular, on August 8, 2006, Ministry of Commerce (“MOC”), China Security and Regulatory Commission (“CSRC”), State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”) and State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the PRC (“SAIC”), State Administration for Taxation (“SAT”) and National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”) promulgated the Provisions on the Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprise by Foreign Investors (“M&A Regulations” or “Provision 10”), which came into effect on September 8, 2006 and was revised on June 22, 2009 by MOC. The Provision 10 was supplemented by the Provisions on indirect issuance of securities overseas by a domestic enterprise or overseas listing of its securities for trading issued by CSRC on by the Guidelines on Domestic Enterprises indirectly issuing securities overseas or listing and trading their securities overseas ("CSRC Guidelines") issued by the CSRC on September 21, 2006.

In the opinion of Delta’s PRC Counsel, Jingtian & Gongcheng, based on its understanding of current PRC laws and regulations, Provision 10 does not apply to each of Jiangsu Delta acquisition by Zhengxin International, Jiangsu Delta acquisition by Delta and Zhengxin R&D acquisition by Jiangsu Delta (collectively the “PRC Acquisitions”), and hence the PRC Acquisitions are not subject to the MOC’s approval.

However, there is no assurance that the relevant Chinese government agency, including the CSRC, would reach the same conclusion as the PRC Counsel. If the CSRC or any other Chinese regulatory bodies subsequently determine that Delta needs to obtain the CSRC approval for the acquisition of PRC subsidiaries of Delta, Delta may face regulatory actions or other sanctions from the CSRC or other Chinese regulatory bodies. This may have a material adverse impact on Delta’s business, financial condition, results of operations, remittance of profits as well as the trading prices of its shares.

Failure of Delta’s PRC resident shareholders to comply with regulations on foreign exchange registration of overseas investment by PRC residents could cause it to lose its ability to contribute capital to its PRC subsidiaries and remit profits out of the PRC as dividends.

The Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Residents to Engage in Overseas Financing and Round Trip Investment via Overseas Special Purpose Vehicles (“Circular 75”), issued by the SAFE and effective on November 1, 2005, regulates the foreign exchange matters in relation to the use of a “special purpose vehicle” by PRC residents to seek offshore equity financing and conduct a “round trip investment” in China. Under Circular 75, a “special purpose vehicle” refers to an offshore entity directly established or indirectly controlled by PRC resident natural or legal persons (“PRC residents”) for the purpose of seeking offshore equity financing using assets or interests owned by such PRC residents in onshore companies, while “round trip investment” refers to the direct investment in China by such PRC residents through the “special purpose vehicles,” including, without limitation, establishing foreign-invested enterprises and using such foreign-invested enterprises to purchase or control onshore assets through contractual arrangements. Circular 75 requires that, before establishing or controlling a “special purpose vehicle”, PRC residents and PRC entities are required to complete a foreign exchange registration with the competent local branches of the SAFE for their overseas investments. After the completion of a round-trip investment or the overseas equity financing, the PRC residents are required to go through foreign exchange registration alteration formalities of overseas investment in respect of net assets of special purpose vehicles that such PRC residents hold and the variation thereof.

In addition, an amendment to the registration is required if there is a material change in the “special purpose vehicle,” such as increase or reduction of share capital and transfer of shares. Failure to comply with the registration procedures set forth in Circular 75 may result in restrictions on the foreign exchange activities of the relevant foreign-invested enterprises, including the payment of dividends and other distributions, such as proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation, to its offshore parent or affiliate and the capital inflow from the offshore parent, and may also subject the relevant PRC residents to penalties under PRC foreign exchange administration regulations.

Delta has requested its current PRC resident shareholders and/or beneficial owners to disclose whether they or their shareholders or beneficial owners fall within the scope of the Circular 75 and urges PRC residents to register with the local SAFE branch as required under the Circular 75. Delta’s affiliates subject to the SAFE registration requirements, including Mr. Chao Xin, Mr. Yan Hong and Mr. Shen Lei, have informed it that they have made their initial registrations with SAFE dated June 5, 2013. The failure of its PRC resident shareholders and/or beneficial owners to timely amend their SAFE registrations pursuant to the Circular 75 or the failure of its future shareholders and/or beneficial owners who are PRC residents to comply with the registration requirement set forth in the Circular 75 may subject such shareholders, beneficial owners and/or its PRC subsidiaries to fines and legal sanctions. Any such failure may also limit its ability to contribute additional capital into its PRC subsidiaries, limit its PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends to it or otherwise adversely affect its business.

The PRC government could restrict access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions. If the foreign exchange control system prevents it from obtaining sufficient foreign currency to satisfy its currency demands, Delta may not be able to pay certain expenses as they come due or may restrict which limit the payment of dividends from the Company.

Delta’s results and financial conditions are highly susceptible to changes in the PRC’s political, economic and social conditions as its revenue is currently wholly derived from its operations in the PRC.

Since 1978, the PRC government has undertaken various reforms of its economic systems. Such reforms have resulted in economic growth for the PRC in the last three decades. However, many of the reforms are unprecedented or experimental, and are expected to be refined and modified from time to time. Other political, economic and social factors may also lead to further readjustment of the reform measures. This refinement and adjustment process may consequently have a material impact on its operations in the PRC or a material adverse impact on its financial performance. Delta’s results and financial condition may be adversely affected by changes in the PRC’s political, economic and social conditions and by changes in policies of the PRC government or changes in laws, regulations or the interpretation or implementation thereof.

Dividends payable to Delta by its PRC subsidiaries may be subject to PRC withholding taxes, dividends distributed to its non-PRC investors and gains realized by its non-PRC shareholders from the transfer of its shares may be subject to PRC withholding taxes under the EIT Law.

The EIT Law imposes a 10% withholding income tax on dividends generated on or after January 1, 2008 and distributed by a resident enterprise to its foreign investors, if such foreign investors are considered as non-resident enterprises without any establishment or place of business within China or if the received dividends have no connection with such foreign investors’ establishment or place of business within China, unless such foreign investors’ jurisdiction of incorporation has a tax treaty with China that provides for a different withholding arrangement. The British Virgin Islands, where Delta is incorporated, does not have such tax treaty with According to the Arrangement between Mainland of China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region on the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income in August 2006, dividends paid by a foreign invested enterprise, or FIE, to its foreign investors in Hong Kong will be subject to withholding tax at a preferential rate of no more than 5% (if the foreign investor owns directly at least 25% of the shares of the FIE). The State Administration of Taxation further promulgated a circular, or Circular 601, on October 27, 2009, which provides that tax treaty benefits will be denied to “conduit” or shell companies without business substance and that a beneficial ownership analysis will be used based on a “substance-over-form” principle to determine whether or not to grant the tax treaty benefits. Delta’s subsidiaries in China are directly invested in and held by a Hong Kong registered entity. If Delta is regarded as a non-resident enterprise and its Hong Kong entity regarded as resident enterprise, then its Hong Kong entity may be required to pay a 10% withholding tax on any dividends payable to it. If its Hong Kong entity is regarded as non-resident enterprises, then its subsidiaries in China will be required to pay a 5% withholding tax for any dividends payable to its Hong Kong entities provided that specific conditions are met. However, it is still unclear at this stage whether Circular 601 applies to dividends from its PRC subsidiaries paid to its Hong Kong subsidiary and if its Hong Kong subsidiary were not considered as “beneficial owners” of any dividends from its PRC subsidiaries, the dividends payable to its Hong Kong subsidiary would be subject to withholding tax at a rate of 10%. In either case, the amount of funds available to it, including the payment of dividends to its shareholders, could be materially reduced. In addition, because there remains uncertainty regarding the concept of “the place of de facto management body,” if Delta is regarded as a resident enterprise, under the EIT Law, any dividends to be distributed by it to its non-PRC shareholders will be subject to PRC withholding tax. Delta also cannot guarantee that any gains realized by such non-PRC shareholders from the transfer of its shares will not be subject to PRC withholding tax. If Delta is required under the EIT Law to withhold PRC income tax on its dividends payable to its non-PRC shareholders or any gains realized by its non-PRC shareholders from transfer of its shares, their investment in its shares may be materially and adversely affected.

Delta may be subject to a significant withholding tax should equity transfers by its non-resident enterprises be determined to have been done without a reasonable business purpose.

In December 2009, the State Administration of Tax in China issued a circular on strengthening the management of proceeds from equity transfers by non-resident enterprises and requires foreign entities to report indirect sales of resident enterprises. If the existence of the overseas intermediary holding company is disregarded due to lack of reasonable business purpose or substance, gains on such sale are subject to PRC withholding tax. Due to limited guidance and implementation history of the circular, significant judgment is required in determining the existence of a reasonable business purpose by considering multiple factors, such as the form and substance of the arrangement, time of establishment of the foreign entity, relationship between each step of the arrangement, relationship between each component of the arrangement, implementation of the arrangement and the changes in the financial position of all parties involved in the transaction. Although Delta believes that its transactions during all the periods presented would be determined to have reasonable business purposes, should this not be the case, the Company would be subject to a significant withholding tax that could materially and adversely impact its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Uncertainty in the interpretation of PRC tax regulations may have a negative impact on Delta’s business operations, its acquisition or restructuring strategy or the value of yits investment in it.

Pursuant to the Notice on Strengthening Administration of Enterprise Income Tax for Share Transfers by Non-PRC Resident Enterprises, or SAT Circular 698, issued by the State Administration of Taxation in December 2009, with retroactive effect from January 1, 2008, where a non-resident enterprise transfers the equity interests of a PRC resident enterprise indirectly by disposition of the equity interests of an overseas non-public holding company, or an Indirect Transfer, and such overseas holding company is located in a tax jurisdiction that: (i) has an effective tax rate of less than 12.5% or (ii) does not impose income tax on foreign income of its residents, the non-resident enterprise, being the transferor, must report to the competent tax authority of the PRC resident enterprise this Indirect Transfer. Using a “substance over form” principle, the PRC tax authority may disregard the existence of the overseas holding company if it lacks a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of reducing, avoiding or deferring PRC tax. As a result, gains derived from such Indirect Transfer may be subject to PRC withholding tax at a rate of up to 10%. SAT Circular 698 also provides that, where a non-PRC resident enterprise transfers its equity interests in a PRC resident enterprise to its related parties at a price lower than fair market value, the relevant tax authority has the power to make a reasonable adjustment to the taxable income of the transaction.

On March 28, 2011, the State Administration of Taxation released SAT Public Notice (2011) No. 24, or SAT Public Notice 24, to clarify several issues related to Circular 698. SAT Public Notice 24 became effective on April 1, 2011. According to SAT Public Notice 24, the term “effective tax rate” refers to the effective tax rate on the gain derived from disposition of the equity interests of an overseas holding company; and the term “does not impose income tax” refers to the cases where the gain derived from disposition of the equity interests of an overseas holding company is not subject to income tax in the country/region where the overseas holding company is a resident.

There is uncertainty as to the application of SAT Circular 698. For example, while the term “Indirect Transfer” is not clearly defined, it is understood that the relevant PRC tax authorities have jurisdiction regarding requests for information over a wide range of foreign entities having no direct contact with China. Moreover, the relevant authority has not yet promulgated any formal provisions or made any formal declaration as to the process and format for reporting an Indirect Transfer to the competent tax authority of the relevant PRC resident enterprise. In addition, there are no formal declarations with regard to how to determine whether a foreign investor has adopted an abusive arrangement in order to reduce, avoid or defer PRC tax. SAT Circular 698 may be determined by the tax authorities to be applicable to previous investments by non-resident investors in its company, if any of such transactions were determined by the tax authorities to lack reasonable commercial purpose. As a result, Delta and its existing non-resident investors may be at risk of being taxed under SAT Circular 698 and may be required to expend valuable resources to comply with SAT Circular 698 or to establish that Delta should not be taxed under SAT Circular 698, which may have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations or such non-resident investors’ investments in it. Delta have conducted and may conduct transactions involving its corporate structure. Delta cannot assure you that the PRC tax authorities will not, at their discretion, adjust any capital gains and impose tax return filing obligations on it or require it to provide assistance for the investigation of PRC tax authorities with respect thereto. Any PRC tax imposed on a transfer of its shares or any adjustment of such gains would cause it to incur additional costs and may have a negative impact on the value of your investment in it.

PRC regulation of loans and direct investment by offshore holding companies to PRC entities may delay or prevent it from using the proceeds from the offerings of any securities to make loans or additional capital contributions to its PRC operating subsidiaries.

As an offshore holding company, its ability to make loans or additional capital contributions to its PRC operating subsidiaries is subject to PRC regulations and approvals. These regulations and approvals may delay or prevent it from using the proceeds Delta received in the past or will receive in the future from the offerings of securities to make loans or additional capital contributions to its PRC operating subsidiaries, and impair its ability to fund and expand its business which may adversely affect its business, financial condition and result of operations.

For example, the SAFE promulgated the Circular on the Relevant Operating Issues concerning Administration Improvement of Payment and Settlement of Foreign Currency Capital of Foreign-Invested Enterprises, or Circular 142, on August 29, 2008. Under Circular 142, registered capital of a foreign-invested company settled in RMB converted from foreign currencies may only be used within the business scope approved by the applicable governmental authority and may not be used for equity investments in the PRC. In addition, foreign-invested companies may not change how they use such capital without the SAFE’s approval, and may not in any case use such capital to repay RMB loans if they have not used the proceeds of such loans. Furthermore, the SAFE promulgated a circular on November 9, 2010, or Circular 59, which requires the authenticity of settlement of net proceeds from offshore offerings to be closely examined and the net proceeds to be settled in the manner described in the offering documents. In addition, to strengthen Circular 142, on November 9, 2011, the SAFE promulgated the Circular on Further Clarifying and Regulating Relevant Issues Concerning the Administration of Foreign Exchange under Capital Account, or Circular 45, which prohibits a foreign invested company from converting its registered capital in foreign exchange currency into RMB for the purpose of making domestic equity investments, granting entrusted loans, repaying inter-company loans, and repaying bank loans that have been transferred to a third party. Circular 142, Circular 59 and Circular 45 may significantly limit Delta’s ability to transfer the net proceeds from offerings of its securities or any future offering to its PRC subsidiaries and convert the net proceeds into RMB, which may adversely affect its liquidity and its ability to fund and expand its business in the PRC.

Currency fluctuations and restrictions on currency exchange may adversely affect Delta’s business, including limiting its ability to convert RMB into foreign currencies and, if RMB were to decline in value, reducing its revenues and profits in U.S. dollar terms.

Delta’s reporting currency is the U.S. dollar and its operations in China use RMB as functional currencies. The majority of its revenues derived and expenses incurred are in Chinese RMB with a relatively small amount in U.S. dollars. Delta is subject to the effects of exchange rate fluctuations with respect to any of these currencies. For example, the value of the RMB depends to a large extent on Chinese government policies and China’s domestic and international economic and political developments, as well as supply and demand in the local market. Starting July 2005, the Chinese government changed its policy of pegging the value of the RMB to the U.S. dollar. Under the new policy, the RMB has fluctuated within a narrow and managed band against a basket of certain foreign currencies.  It is possible that the Chinese government will adopt a more flexible currency policy, which could result in more significant fluctuations of the RMB against the U.S. dollar.

The income statements of Delta’s China operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates in each applicable period. To the extent the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, the translation of these foreign currency-denominated transactions results in reduced revenues, operating expenses and net income for its non-U.S. operations. Similarly, to the extent the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies, the translation of RMB denominated transactions results in increased revenues, operating expenses and net income for its non-U.S. operations. Delta is also exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as Delta converts the financial statements of its non-U.S. subsidiaries into U.S. dollars in consolidation. If there is a change in foreign currency exchange rates, the conversion of the non-U.S. subsidiaries’ financial statements into U.S. dollars will lead to a translation gain or loss which is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. Delta has not entered into agreements or purchased instruments to hedge its exchange rate risks, although Delta may do so in the future. The availability and effectiveness of any hedging transaction may be limited and Delta may not be able to successfully hedge its exchange rate risks.

Although Chinese governmental policies were introduced in 1996 to allow the convertibility of RMB into foreign currency for current account items, conversion of RMB into foreign exchange for most of the capital items, such as foreign direct investment, loans or securities, requires the approval of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE. These approvals, however, do not guarantee the availability of foreign currency. Delta cannot be sure that Delta will be able to obtain all required conversion approvals for its operations or that Chinese regulatory authorities will not impose greater restrictions on the convertibility of RMB in the future. Because a significant amount of its future revenues may be in the form of RMB, its inability to obtain the requisite approvals or any future restrictions on currency exchanges could limit its ability to utilize revenue generated in RMB to fund its business activities outside China, or to repay non-RMB-denominated obligations, including its debt obligations, which would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

Restrictions on paying dividends or making other payments to Delta bind its subsidiaries in China.

Delta is a holding company and do not have any assets or conduct any business operations in China other than its investments in its subsidiaries in China. As a result, if its non-China operations require cash from China, Delta would depend on dividend payments from its subsidiaries in China. Delta cannot make any assurance that it can continue to receive payments from its subsidiaries in China. In addition, under Chinese law, its subsidiaries are only allowed to pay dividends to it out of their distributable earnings, if any, as determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. Moreover, Delta’s Chinese subsidiaries are required to set aside at least 10% of their respective after-tax profit each year, if any, to fund certain mandated reserve funds, unless these reserves have reached 50% of their registered capital. These reserve funds are not payable or distributable as cash dividends. For Chinese subsidiaries with after-tax profits for the periods presented, the difference between after-tax profits as calculated under PRC accounting standards and U.S. GAAP relates primarily to share-based compensation expenses and intangible assets amortization expenses, which are not pushed down to its subsidiaries under PRC accounting standards. In addition, under the EIT Law and its implementing Rules, dividends generated from its PRC subsidiaries after January 1, 2008 and payable to their immediate holding company incorporated in Hong Kong generally will be subject to a withholding tax rate of 10% (unless the PRC tax authorities determine that its Hong Kong subsidiary is a resident enterprise). If certain conditions and requirements under the Arrangement between the Mainland of China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income entered into between Hong Kong and the PRC and other related PRC laws and regulations are met, the withholding rate could be reduced to 5%.

The Chinese government also imposes controls on the convertibility of RMB into foreign currencies and the remittance of currency out of China in certain cases. Delta has experienced and may continue to experience difficulties in completing the administrative procedures necessary to obtain and remit foreign currency. If Delta or any of its subsidiaries are unable to receive substantially all of the economic benefits from its operations through these contractual or dividend arrangements, Delta may be unable to effectively finance its operations or pay dividends on its ordinary shares.

PRC laws and regulations establish more complex procedures for some acquisitions of Chinese companies by foreign investors, which could make it more difficult for Delta to pursue growth through acquisitions in China.

A number of PRC laws and regulations, including the Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies in 2006, or the M&A Rules, the Antimonopoly Law, and the Rules of Ministry of Commerce on Implementation of Security Review System of Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors promulgated by the Ministry of Commerce in August 2011, or the Security Review Rules, have established procedures and requirements that are expected to make merger and acquisition activities in China by foreign investors more time consuming and complex. These include requirements in some instances that the Ministry of Commerce be notified in advance of any change of control transaction in which a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise, or that the approval from the Ministry of Commerce be obtained in circumstances where overseas companies established or controlled by PRC enterprises or residents acquire affiliated domestic companies. PRC laws and regulations also require certain merger and acquisition transactions to be subject to merger control review or security review.

The Security Review Rules were formulated to implement the Notice of the General Office of the State Council on Establishing the Security Review System for Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, also known as Circular 6, which was promulgated in 2011. Under these rules, a security review is required for mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors having “national defense and security” concerns and mergers and acquisitions by which foreign investors may acquire the “de facto control” of domestic enterprises have “national security” concerns. In addition, when deciding whether a specific merger or acquisition of a domestic enterprise by foreign investors is subject to the security review, the Ministry of Commerce will look into the substance and actual impact of the transaction. The Security Review Rules further prohibits foreign investors from bypassing the security review requirement by structuring transactions through proxies, trusts, indirect investments, leases, loans, control through contractual arrangements or offshore transactions.

There is no requirement for foreign investors in those mergers and acquisitions transactions already completed prior to the promulgation of Circular 6 to submit such transactions to the Ministry of Commerce for security review. As Delta has already obtained the “de facto control” over its affiliated PRC entities prior to the effectiveness of these rules, Delta does not believe Delta is required to submit its existing contractual arrangements to the Ministry of Commerce for security review.

However, as these rules are relatively new and there is a lack of clear statutory interpretation on the implementation of the same, there is no assurance that the Ministry of Commerce will not apply these national security review-related rules to the acquisition of equity interest in its PRC subsidiaries. If Delta is found to be in violation of the Security Review Rules and other PRC laws and regulations with respect to the merger and acquisition activities in China, or fail to obtain any of the required approvals, the relevant regulatory authorities would have broad discretion in dealing with such violation, including levying fines, confiscating its income, revoking its PRC subsidiaries’ business or operating licenses, requiring it to restructure or unwind the relevant ownership structure or operations. Any of these actions could cause significant disruption to its business operations and may materially and adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, if the business of any target company that Delta plans to acquire falls into the ambit of security review, it may not be able to successfully acquire such company either by equity or asset acquisition, capital contribution or through any contractual arrangement. Delta may grow its business in part by acquiring other companies operating in its industry. Complying with the requirements of the relevant regulations to complete such transactions could be time consuming, and any required approval processes, including approval from the Ministry of Commerce, may delay or inhibit its ability to complete such transactions, which could affect its ability to expand its business or maintain its market share.

The PRC Labor Contract Law and its implementing rules may adversely affect its business and results of operations.

The PRC Labor Contract Law became effective and was implemented on January 1, 2008. The PRC Labor Contract Law has reinforced the protection for employees who, under the PRC Labor Contract Law, have the right, among others, to have written labor contracts, to enter into labor contracts with no fixed terms under certain circumstances, to receive overtime wages and to terminate or alter terms in labor contracts. Furthermore, the PRC Labor Contract Law establishes additional restrictions and increases the costs involved with dismissing employees. As the PRC Labor Contract Law is relatively new, there remains significant uncertainty as to its interpretation and application by the PRC Government. In the event that Delta decides to significantly reduce its workforce, the PRC Labor Contract Law could adversely affect its ability to do so in a timely and cost effective manner, and its results of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, for employees whose contracts include non-competition terms, the Labor Contract Law requires it to pay monthly compensation after such employment is terminated, which will increase its operating expenses.

Failure by Delta’s PRC shareholders or beneficial owners to make required foreign exchange filings and registrations may prevent Delta from distributing dividends and expose Delta to liabilities under the PRC laws.

The Circular on Relevant Issues concerning Foreign Exchange Administration of Overseas Investment and Financing and Return Investments Conducted by Domestic Residents through Overseas Special Purpose Vehicles  (‘‘SAFE Circular No. 37’’), which was promulgated by SAFE and became effective on July 14, 2014, requires a PRC individual resident (‘‘PRC Resident’’) to register with the local SAFE branch before he or she contributes assets or equity interests in an overseas special purpose vehicle (‘‘Offshore SPV’’) that is directly established or controlled by the PRC Resident for the purpose of conducting investment or financing. Following the initial registration, the PRC Resident is also required to register with the local SAFE branch for any major change in respect of the Offshore SPV, including, among other things, any major change of a PRC Resident shareholder, name or term of operation of the Offshore SPV, or any increase or reduction of the Offshore SPV’s registered capital, share transfer or swap, merger or division. Failure to comply with the registration procedures of SAFE Circular No. 37 may result in penalties and sanctions, including the imposition of restrictions on the ability of the Offshore SPV’s PRC subsidiary to distribute dividends to its overseas parent.

The existing shareholders and beneficial owners of Delta currently are subject to the registration procedures under SAFE Circular No. 37. However, as SAFE Circular No. 37 was recently promulgated, it is unclear how this regulation and any future regulation concerning offshore or cross-border transactions will be interpreted, amended or implemented by the relevant government authorities. It cannot be predicted that how these regulations will affect Delta’s business operations or future strategies. Any failure by Delta’s PRC Resident shareholders or beneficial owners to make the updates with SAFE may subject the relevant PRC Resident shareholders or beneficial owners to penalties, restrict Delta’s overseas or cross-border investment activities, limit Delta PRC subsidiaries’ ability to make distributions or pay dividends, or affect its ownership structure and capital inflow from its offshore subsidiaries. As such, Delta’s business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity as well as its ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to its shareholders may be materially and adversely affected.

There are defects in Delta’s titles of or rights to use its properties.

Delta has not received the record of completion acceptance from the relevant authority for its facilities used in its production and storage (“ Properties ”). Delta does not have valid title or right to the said Properties. Any dispute or claim in relation to the title to the Properties, including any litigation involving allegations of illegal or unauthorized use of the Properties, may materially and adversely affect Delta’s operations, financial condition, reputation and future growth. However, we are in the process of applying to relevant authority to obtain the completion acceptance for the Properties.

Delta is manufacturing certain products that are beyond its business scope.

Jiangsu Delta has been producing UPR, which is beyond the business scope of Jiangsu Delta. As a result, Jiangsu Delta may be imposed penalty and the business license of Jiangsu Delta may be revoked by relevant authority. However, Jiangsu Delta is applying to relevant authority to enlarge its business scope to include production of UPR. In the event that such approval is not obtained, Jiangsu Delta will have to suspend production of UPR, which might adversely affect the financial prospect and results of operation of Delta.

Delta is conducting certain business that is beyond its approved production capacity.

Jiangsu Delta is producing 30,000 tons of PCT/OCT series and downstream products per annum which are beyond the approved annual production capacity of 10,000 tons. As a result, Jiangsu Delta might be imposed penalty of RMB 500,000 to RMB 1,000,000 by relevant authority. However, Jiangsu Delta is applying to relevant authority to increase Jiangsu Delta’s annual approved production capacity to 30,000 tons. In the event that such application is denied, Jiangsu Delta will have to reduce its actual production under the approved capacity. As a result, Delta’s production might not keep up with the demand of its customers, which may adversely affect Delta’s revenue and financial conditions.

Risks Relating to Delta’s Securities

While Delta believes that Delta currently has adequate internal control procedures in place, Delta is still exposed to potential risks from legislation requiring companies to evaluate controls under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Under the supervision and with the participation of its management, Delta has evaluated its internal controls systems in order to allow management to report on, and its registered independent public accounting firm to attest to, its internal controls, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Delta has performed the system and process evaluation and testing required in an effort to comply with the management certification and auditor attestation requirements of Section 404. As a result, Delta has incurred additional expenses and a diversion of management’s time.

If Delta fails to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, a material misstatement of its financial statements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In addition, Delta may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that Delta has effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404. This could in turn result in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of its financial statements and negatively impact the trading price of its shares. Furthermore, if Delta is not able to continue to meet the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, Delta might be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC or the NASDAQ. Any such action could adversely affect its financial results and the market price of its ordinary shares.

As a foreign private issuer, Delta has limited reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which makes it less transparent than a United States issuer.

As a foreign private issuer, the rules and regulations under the Exchange Act provide it with certain exemptions from the reporting obligations of United States issuers. Delta is exempt from the rules prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and its officers, directors and principal stockholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions. Also, Delta is not required to publish financial statements as frequently, as promptly or containing the same information as United States companies. The result is that Delta will be less transparent than a U.S. issuer.

Delta may be classified as a passive foreign investment company for United States federal income tax purposes, which could result in adverse United States federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders.

Based on the market price of its ordinary shares, the value of its assets, and the composition of its assets and income, Delta do not believe that Delta were a passive foreign investment company (a “PFIC”) for United States federal income tax purposes for its taxable year ended June 30, 2014 and Delta do not expect to be one for its taxable year ending June 30, 2015 or become one in the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, the application of the PFIC rules is subject to ambiguity in several respects and, in addition, Delta must make a separate determination each year as to whether Delta is a PFIC (after the close of each taxable year). Accordingly, Delta cannot assure you that Delta will not be a PFIC for the current or any other taxable year.

A non-United States corporation, such as its company, will be classified as a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes for any taxable year, if either (1) 75% or more of its gross income for such year consists of certain types of “passive” income, or (2) 50% or more of its average quarterly assets as determined on the basis of fair market value during such year produce or are held for the production of passive income. Because there are uncertainties in the application of the relevant rules and PFIC status is a fact-intensive determination made on an annual basis, no assurance can be given with respect to its PFIC status for the current or any other taxable year.

If Delta is characterized as a PFIC for any year, a U.S. holder may incur significantly increased United States income tax on gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of its ordinary shares and on the receipt of distributions on its notes or ordinary shares to the extent such gain or distribution is treated as an “excess distribution” under the United States federal income tax rules. 

Delta did not obtain a fairness opinion from an independent investment banking firm as to the fair market value of Delta.

The fair market value of Delta was determined by its board of directors based upon an analysis conducted by them (which may include an analysis of actual and potential sales, earnings, cash flow and/or book value), and Delta did not obtain an opinion from an unaffiliated, independent investment banking firm. Delta’s shareholders must, therefore, rely solely on the judgment of its board of directors with respect to the determination of the fair market value of its initial acquisition transaction.

Delta’s outstanding convertible or exercisable securities may adversely affect the market price of its units and underlying securities, and make it more difficult to effect an acquisition transaction.

Delta currently have issued and outstanding securities convertible into or exercisable for 2,034,600 ordinary shares. The sale or possibility of sale of the shares underlying these securities could have an adverse effect on the market price for its securities or its ability to obtain future financing. If and to the extent these securities are converted or exercised, you may experience dilution to your holdings.

One of its stockholders holds a significant percentage of its outstanding voting securities.

Mr. Xin Chao, who is its Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, directly or indirectly owns approximately 34.27% of its outstanding voting securities. As a result, he possesses significant influence, giving him the ability, among other things, to elect a majority of its Board of Directors and to authorize or prevent proposed significant corporate transactions. His ownership and control may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a future change in control, impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination or discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer, all of which may prevent it from implementing its business strategies.

Additional Risk factors to consider

Rights of shareholders under British Virgin Islands law differ from those under United States law, and, accordingly, Delta’s shareholders may have fewer protections.

Delta’s corporate affairs are governed by its Memorandum and Articles of Association, the BVI Business Companies Act, 2004 (as amended, the “BVI Act”) and the common law of the British Virgin Islands. The rights of shareholders to take legal action against its directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of its directors under British Virgin Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the British Virgin Islands and by the BVI Act. The common law of the British Virgin Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the British Virgin Islands as well as from English common law, which has persuasive, but not binding, authority on a court in the British Virgin Islands. The rights of its shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of its directors under British Virgin Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedents in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the British Virgin Islands has a less developed body of securities laws as compared to the United States, and some states (such as Delaware) have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law. As a result of the foregoing, holders of its ordinary shares may have more difficulty in protecting their interests through actions against its management, directors or major shareholders than they would as shareholders of a U.S. company.

The laws of the British Virgin Islands provide limited protection for minority shareholders, so minority shareholders will have limited or no recourse if they are dissatisfied with the conduct of Delta’s affairs.

Under the laws of the British Virgin Islands, there is limited statutory law for the protection of minority shareholders other than the provisions of the BVI Act dealing with shareholder. The principal protection under statutory law is that shareholders may bring an action to enforce the constituent documents of a British Virgin Islands company and are entitled to have the affairs of the company conducted in accordance with the BVI Act and the memorandum and articles of association of the company. As such, if those who control the company have persistently disregarded the requirements of the BVI Act or the provisions of the company’s memorandum and articles of association, then the courts will likely grant relief. Generally, the areas in which the courts will intervene are the following: (i) an act complained of which is outside the scope of the authorized business or is illegal or not capable of ratification by the majority; (ii) acts that constitute fraud on the minority where the wrongdoers control the company; (iii) acts that infringe on the personal rights of the shareholders, such as the right to vote; and (iv) acts where the company has not complied with provisions requiring approval of a special or extraordinary majority of shareholders, which are more limited than the rights afforded to minority shareholders under the laws of many states in the United States.

It may be difficult to enforce judgments against Delta or its executive officers and directors in jurisdictions outside the United States.

Under its Memorandum and Articles of Association, Delta may indemnify and hold its directors harmless against all claims and suits brought against them, subject to limited exceptions. Furthermore, to the extent allowed by law, the rights and obligations among or between it, any of its current or former directors, officers and employees and any current or former shareholder will be governed exclusively by the laws of the British Virgin Islands and subject to the jurisdiction of the British Virgin Islands courts, unless those rights or obligations do not relate to or arise out of their capacities as such. Although there is doubt as to whether United States courts would enforce these provisions in an action brought in the United States under United States securities laws, these provisions could make judgments obtained outside of the British Virgin Islands more difficult to enforce against its assets in the British Virgin Islands or jurisdictions that would apply British Virgin Islands law.

British Virgin Islands companies may not be able to initiate shareholder derivative actions, thereby depriving shareholders of one avenue to protect their interests.

British Virgin Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States. The circumstances in which any such action may be brought, and the procedures and defenses that may be available in respect of any such action, may result in the rights of shareholders of a British Virgin Islands company being more limited than those of shareholders of a company organized in the United States. Accordingly, shareholders may have fewer alternatives available to them if they believe that corporate wrongdoing has occurred. The British Virgin Islands courts are also unlikely to recognize or enforce judgments of courts in the United States based on certain liability provisions of United States securities law or to impose liabilities, in original actions brought in the British Virgin Islands, based on certain liability provisions of the United States securities laws that are penal in nature. There is no statutory recognition in the British Virgin Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, although the courts of the British Virgin Islands will generally recognize and enforce the non-penal judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without retrial on the merits. This means that even if shareholders were to sue Delta successfully, they may not be able to recover anything to make up for the losses suffered.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

The information in this report contains forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact made in this report are forward looking. In particular, the statements herein regarding industry prospects and future results of operations or financial position are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "believes," "estimates," "could," "possibly," "probably," anticipates," "projects," "expects," "may," "will," or "should" or other variations or similar words. No assurances can be given that the future results anticipated by the forward-looking statements will be achieved. Forward-looking statements reflect management's current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Our actual results may differ significantly from management's expectations.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements, included herewith. This discussion should not be construed to imply that the results discussed herein will necessarily continue into the future, or that any conclusion reached herein will necessarily be indicative of actual operating results in the future. Such discussion represents only the best present assessment of our management.

Overview

Delta is a fine and specialty chemical manufacturer, primarily engaged in manufacturing and selling of organic compound including para-chlorotoluene (“PCT”), ortho-chlorotoluene (“OCT”), PCT/OCT downstream products, unsaturated polyester resin (“UPR”), maleic acid (“MA”) and other by-product chemicals.

Delta collaborates with reputable universities, such as the East China Normal University in order to secure its position as a market leader. Delta also closely monitors the market for development, trends and technological innovations and solicit customer feedback so as to keep abreast with market demands and industrial development.

As at the date of this report, Delta has a diversified clientele with more than 380 customers based either in domestic or overseas market. Approximately 90% of its sales are to its domestic customers based in Jiangsu Province, Anhui Province, Zhejiang Province, Hubei Province, Guangdong Province and Chongqing Metropolitan, and the rest of its products are exported via agents or trading companies to countries outside the PRC which include but not limited to India, Brazil, Japan, European Union member countries and America.

The Company primarily functions as a holding company for entities that control the business of . This discussion and analysis focuses on the business results, comparing results of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012

Results of Operations

In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, our Company’s revenue and net income had an increase as compared with the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. These decreases were primarily attributable to a result of decrease in the sale.

The following table summarizes the results of our operations during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and provides information regarding the dollar and percentage increase (or decrease) from the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Revenue

Revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, was $124,218,213, an increase of 29.90% as compared with revenues of $95,627,051 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, we sold 21,486 tons of unsaturated polyester resin (“UPR”), an increase of 8.82% as compared with 19,745 tons of UPR in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, we sold 37,501 tons of p(o)-chlorotoluene (“PCT/OCT”), an increase of 4.34% as compared with 35,941 tons in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. The increase was due primarily to a rise in demand. We launched Supply Chain Management business in the Fiscal Year Ended June 30 2012.

The following table breaks down application categories as percentage of total revenue:

Gross Profit

Gross profit decrease 5.61% to $24,484,997 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, as compared with $25,940,441 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. The gross margin down 7.42% from 27.13% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 to 19.71% for the same period of 2013, mainly due to the loss-making trading sales in the SCM.

The table below presents information about our gross profit for the periods indicated:

Operating Income

Operating income was $17,842,614 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013,representing a 6.53% decrease as compared with $19,088,375 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. The operating margin down 5.60% from 19.96% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 to 14.36% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. Especially, the SCM gross loss margin was 5.53% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. The decrease in operating margin mainly due to a sale volume increase of 8,183% in the SCM for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 as compare with the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales was $99,733,216 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, representing a 43.12% increase as compared with $69,686,610 for the same period of 2012. The increase in cost of sales was due to sales growth.

The table below presents information about our cost of net revenue for the periods indicated:

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses was$6,642,383 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, representing a 3.06% decrease as compared with $6,852,066 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. The decreased was primarily due to two factors: (i) selling expenses decrease 2.79% to $2,374,609 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 from $2,442,753 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012,the selling expenses decreased because of we reduced our sales promotional efforts while market demand was naturally strong, and(ii) general and administration expenses decrease 3.21% to $4,267,774 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 from $4,409,313 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. The general & administrative expenses decreased mainly due to our Company’s entertainment down to RMB1,213,069 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 from RMB2,136,316 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.

The table below presents information about our operating expenses for the periods indicated:

Change in fair value of convertible bonds

Change in fair value of convertible bonds was 37,000 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. This is recorded as a non-cash loss, which resulted from the change in fair value of convertible bonds issued to a series of securities purchase agreements dated January 31, 2011, May 16, 2011 and June 30, 2011 with certain investment funds, pursuant to which it has issued certain bonds for an aggregate principal amount of $18,000,000.

Net Income

Net income was $11,705,736 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, an increase of 11.79% as compared with $10,471,574 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. The increase in net income for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 was main reason increase in revenue and decrease in operating expenses as compared with the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.

The net profit margin down 1.53% from 10.95% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 to 9.42% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. Especially,the SCM gross loss margin was 5.79% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 offset by the other product’s gross margin.

Earnings per Share

Basic and diluted loss per share for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 were $0.29 and $0.20 compared with loss per share $0.26 and $0.22 for the same period of 2012. The weighted average number of shares outstanding to calculate basic EPS was 40,000,000 and 40,000,000 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The weighted average number of shares outstanding to calculate diluted EPS was 58,191,973 and 58,191,973 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have historically financed our operations and capital expenditures principally through private placements of debt and equity offerings and cash provided by operations.

The table below presents information about our cash flow for the periods indicated: 

Operating Activities

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, net cash used in operating activities was $23,824,136. This was primarily attributable to our net income of $11,705,736, adjusted by an add-back of non-cash charges mainly consisting of depreciation, amortization, change in fair value of convertible bonds, written off of goodwill and allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,055,295, $39,927, $37,000, $71,638 and $411,211, respectively, and non-cash gain from deferred income taxes accounts of $94,179, offset by a $40,050,764 decrease in working capital. Specifically, the decrease in working capital was primarily due to: (i) a $20,408,647 trade and other receivables increase driven by customers payment; (ii) a $3,953,649 increase in inventories, principally of finished goods; partially offset by a $16,707,725 decrease in trade and other payables, a $947,128 increase advance from customers deposit, and a $72,129 increase in income tax payables.

Investing Activities

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, net cash used in investing activities was $20,535,030. This was primarily attributable to: (i) a $17,225,856 capital expenditure for purchase of new plant and equipment, (ii) a $2,784,957 capital expenditure for purchase of new land use rights, and a $524,217 capital expenditure for purchase a new company of Jiangsu Zhengxin New Material Research and Development Co., Ltd.

Financing Activities

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, net cash provided by financing activities were $41,358,173, primarily attributable to: (i) a$74,017,122 short-term bank loan borrowing, (ii) a $49,884,676 repayment of bank borrowings, and a $17,225,727 change in restricted cash.

The fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013

Results of Operations

In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, our Company’s revenue and net income had an increase as compared with the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. These decreases were primarily attributable to a result of decrease in the sale. Our sale in the SCM increased quickly with the lowest margin among the products for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 lead to our net profit margin down 5.53%.

The following table summarizes the results of our operations during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and provides information regarding the dollar and percentage increase (or decrease) from the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Revenue

Revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, was $175,327,717, an increase of 41.14% as compared with revenue of $124,218,213 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, we sold 30,014 tons of unsaturated polyester resin (“UPR”), an increase of 39.69% as compared with 21,486 tons of UPR in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, we sold 38,285 tons of p(o)-chlorotoluene (“PCT/OCT”), an increase of 2.09% as compared with 37,501 tons in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. The increase was due primarily to our increased demand that is satisfied by outsourcing . In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, we sold 39,736 tons of SCM, an increase of 385.99% as compared with 8,176 tons of SCM in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. The increase in the SCM was due primarily to our Company adjusted operating strategy to entre the logistics area.

The following table breaks down application categories as percentage of total net revenue:

Gross Profit

Gross profit decreased 28.84% to $17,422,988 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, as compared with $24,484,997 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. The gross margin down 9.77% from 19.71% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 to 9.94% for the same period of 2014, mainly due to that the SCM gross loss margin was 1.17% in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.

The table below presents information about our gross profit for the periods indicated:

Operating Income

Operating income was $11,634,940 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014,representing a 34.79% decrease as compared with $17,842,614 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. The operating margin down 7.73% from 14.36% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 to 6.64% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. Especially, the SCM gross loss margin account of 5.79% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. The decrease in gross margin mainly due to a sale volume increase of 321.58% in SCM for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 as compare with the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.

Cost of Sale

Cost of sales was $157,904,729 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, representing a 58.33% increase as compared with $99,733,216 for the same period of 2013. The increase in cost of sales was due to sales growth.

The table below presents information about our cost of net revenue for the periods indicated:

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses was $5,788,048 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, representing a 12.86% decrease as compared with $6,642,383 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. The decreased was primarily due to two factors: (i) selling expenses decrease 2.89% to $2,306,021 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 from $2,374,609 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013,the selling expenses decreased because of we reduced our sales promotional efforts while market demand was naturally strong, and (ii) general and administration expenses decrease 18.41% to $3,482,027 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 from $4,267,774 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. The general & administrative expenses decreased mainly due to our Company’s entertainment down to 912,523RMB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 from 1,213,069RMB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.

The table below presents information about our operating expenses for the periods indicated:

Change in fair value of convertible bonds

Change in fair value of convertible bonds was 156,199 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. This is recorded as a non-cash loss, which resulted from the change in fair value of convertible bonds issued to a series of securities purchase agreements dated January 31, 2011, May 16, 2011 and June 30, 2011 with certain investment funds, pursuant to which it has issued certain bonds for an aggregate principal amount of $18,000,000.

Net Income

Net income was $6,828,308 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, a decrease of 40.52% as compared with $11,705,736 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. The increase in net income in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 was main reason increase in revenue and decrease in operating expenses as compared with the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.

The net profit margin down 5.53% from 9.42% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 to 3.89% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. Specifically, the UPR and PCT/OCT’s gross profit margin offset by the raw material gross loss margin account of 5.79% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. The decrease in gross margin mainly due to a sales increase of 321.58% in raw material for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 as compare with the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.

Earnings per Share

Basic and diluted loss per share for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 were $0.17 and $0.12 compared with loss per share $0.29 and $0.20 for the same period of 2013. The weighted average number of shares outstanding to calculate basic EPS was 40,000,000 and 40,000,000 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The weighted average number of shares outstanding to calculate diluted EPS was 58,191,973 and 58,191,973 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have historically financed our operations and capital expenditures principally through private placements of debt and equity offerings and cash provided by operations.

The table below presents information about our cash flow for the periods indicated:

Operating Activities

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, net cash provided by operating activities was $3,865,600. This was primarily attributable to our net income of $6,828,308, adjusted by an add-back of non-cash charges mainly consisting of depreciation, amortization, change in fair value of convertible bonds, deferred income taxes and allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,816,403, $41,600, $156,199, $822,200 and $177,179, respectively, and non-cash gain from disposals of property accounts of $113,953, offset by a $88,623,336 decrease in working capital. Specifically, the decrease in working capital was primarily due to: (i) a $16,343,386 trade and other receivables increase driven by customers payment; (ii) a $191,049 increase in inventories, principally of raw material; partially offset by a $8,428,337 increase in trade and other payables, a $665,038 decrease advance from customers deposit, and a $91,200 decrease in income tax payables.

Investing Activities

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, net cash used in investing activities was $24,076,576. This was primarily attributable to: (i) a $23,957,404 capital expenditure for purchase of new plant and equipment, (ii) a $478,184 capital expenditure for purchase of new land use rights, and a $359,012 gain for disposals of property and equipment.

Financing Activities

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, net cash provided by financing activities were $25,303,850, primarily attributable to: (i) a $129,232,006 short-term bank loan borrowing, (ii) a $108,797,261 repayment of bank borrowings, and a $2,011,673 change in restricted cash, and a $2,857,432 due to a shareholder.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Our cash and cash equivalents as at July 1, 2013, were $3,946,135 and increased to $9,045,950 by the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, the increase was mainly due to our net cash increase by operation activities and financing activities.

In future periods, we believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and cash flows from operations, combined with availability under our revolving credit facility, will be insufficient to meet our presently anticipated future cash needs for at least the next year. We may, however, require additional cash resources due to changed business conditions or other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue.

Trade Receivables, net

Trade receivables, net were $53,318,673 as of June 30, 2014, representing a 4.05% increase as compared with $51,242,793 as of June 30, 2013. This increase in trade receivables was primarily attributable to increase in sale.

Inventory

Inventory consists of raw materials, finished goods. As of June 30, 2014, the recorded value of our inventory increased 1.88% to $14,062,567 from $13,803,489 as of June 30, 2013. This increase is mainly due to an increase of 34.44% in raw material from $6,202,218 as of June 30, 2013 to $8,338,302 as of June 30, 2014 offset by a decrease of 24.69% in finished goods from $7,601,271 as of June 30, 2013 to $5,724,265 as of June 30, 2014. The increase in raw material was primarily attributable to the increased storage to meet the production demand.

The following table presents information about our inventory for the periods indicated:

Accounts payable

Accounts payable were $1,760,310 as of June 30, 2014, an increase of 2.46 % from $1,718,125 as of June 30, 2013. The increase was primarily attributable toa largerpurchase volume.

Obligations under Material Contracts

There was no material contractual obligation as of June 30, 2014.

Critical Accounting Policies

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts, transactions, and profits have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Segment Reporting

The Company operates in one business and geographical segment of manufacturing and sales of organic compounds in the PRC. ASC 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. Given the economic characteristics of the similar nature of the products sold, the type of customer and the method of distribution, the Company operates as one reportable segment as defined by ASC 280, Segment Reporting.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company’s financial statements are presented in the U.S. dollar ($), which is the Company’s reporting currency and functional currency. The Company’s subsidiaries in the PRC use Renminbi (“RMB”) as their functional currencies. Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded at the functional currency rate ruling at the date of transaction. Any differences between the initially recorded amount and the settlement amount are recorded as a gain or loss on foreign currency transaction in the consolidated statements of income. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated at the functional currency rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. Any differences are taken to profit or loss as a gain or loss on foreign currency translation in the statements of income.

In accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters, the Company translated the assets and liabilities into US $ using the rate of exchange prevailing at the applicable balance sheet date and the statements of income and cash flows are translated at an average rate during the reporting period. Adjustments resulting from the translation are recorded in shareholders’ equity as part of accumulated other comprehensive income.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue principally represents organic compound sale revenue. Revenue comprises the fair value of the consideration received or receivable for the sale of goods in the ordinary course of the Company’s activities and is recorded net of value added tax (“VAT”). Consistent with the criteria of ASC 605 “Revenue Recognition” (“ASC 605”), the Company recognizes revenue when the following four revenue recognition criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been provided, (iii) the selling price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognized upon delivery when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of goods have transferred t the buyer, continuing managerial involvement usually associated with ownership and effective control have ceased and the coasts incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably.

Interest income is recognized on a time-proportion basis using the effective interest method.

Borrowing Costs

Borrowing costs are recognised in profit or loss using the effective interest method except for those costs that are directly attributable to assets under construction. Borrowing costs on general borrowings are capitalised by applying a capitalization rate to construction or expenditures that are financed by general borrowings. Borrowing costs on general financing during the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were capitalized at a rate of 7.11%, 7.17% and 7.63% respectively.

Leases

The Company accounts for its leases under the provisions of ASC 840, Leases. Certain of the Company’s operating leases provide for minimum annual payments that change over the life of the lease. The aggregate minimum annual payments are expensed on the straight-line basis over the minimum lease term. The Company recognizes a deferred rent liability for minimum step rents when the amount of rent expense exceeds the actual lease payments and it reduces the deferred rent liability when the actual lease payments exceeds the amount of straight-line rent expense. Rent holidays and tenant improvement allowances for store remodels are amortized on the straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease and any option period that is reasonably assured of being exercised.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash are cash deposited in fixed deposit accounts maintained in the PRC and Hong Kong for the purpose of securing bank borrowings.

Trade Receivables

Trade receivables are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The Company extends unsecured credit to its customers in the ordinary course of business but mitigates the associated risks by performing credit checks and actively pursuing past due accounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts is established and determined based on managements’ assessment of known requirements, aging of receivables, payment history, the customer’s current credit worthiness and the economic environment.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of June 30, 2014.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF CIS ACQUISITION LTD.

Forward Looking Statements

All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 6-K including, without limitation, statements under “ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ” regarding our financial position, business strategy and the plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward looking statements. When used in this Form 6-K, words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend” and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, identify forward looking statements. Such forward looking statements are based on the beliefs of management, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. Actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward looking statements as a result of the risk factors and other factors detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 3, of our Form 20-F for the year ended October 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on March 17, 2014. All subsequent written or oral forward looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are qualified in their entirety by this paragraph.

You should also read the following management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and related footnotes thereto included in this report and in conjunction with the MD&A and the audited financial statements and related footnotes thereto included in our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended October 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on March 17, 2014. All capitalized terms in this MD&A that are not defined shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Notes to the Financial Statements included herewith.

Overview

We were formed on November 28, 2011 under the laws of the British Virgin Islands as an innovated public acquisition company (“IPAC”). The Company was formed to acquire, through a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization, exchangeable share transaction or other similar business transaction, one or more operating businesses or assets (“Acquisition Transaction”). An IPAC is a blank check company that permits the Company to return funds from a trust account to redeeming shareholders after the completion of an Acquisition Transaction. To date, our efforts have been limited to organizational activities and a search for suitable businesses or assets to acquire Status as Emerging Growth Company.

As of April 30, 2014, the Company had not yet commenced operations. All activity through April 30, 2014 relates to the Company’s formation, initial public offering of its securities and the identification and investigation of a suitable operating business or assets with which to complete an Acquisition Transaction.

On June 16, 2014, a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Red Rock Agreement”) was entered into by and among CIS, Red Rock Holdings Group, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability company (“Red Rock” or the “Target”), and Foster Jennings, Inc., Red Rock’s sole member (the “Member”). Since the Company entered into the Agreement on June 16, 2014, and filed with the SEC a tender offer on June 23, 2014, the time period for closing the Acquisition Transaction was automatically extended to September 21, 2014. Red Rock defaulted on its obligation under the Red Rock Agreement. On September 16, 2014, CIS terminated the Red Rock Agreement as it did not provide audited financial statements.

On September 16, 2014, a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) was entered into by and among CIS, Delta Advanced Materials Limited, a Hong Kong company (“Delta”) and Elite Ride Limited, a British Virgin Islands company (“Delta’s Parent”) and the Elite Ride Limited Shareholders (“Elite Shareholders”) (See Note 7 – Stock Purchase Agreement).

Critical Accounting Policies

Fair Value

The carrying amounts of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and accrued expenses and other current liabilities, approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received upon the sale of an asset or payment to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the inputs in measuring fair value as follows:

Derivative Warrant Liabilities

The Company accounts for the 4,000,000 public warrants and 4,500,000 placement warrants in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 815-40-15-7D whereby under that provision they do not meet the criteria for equity treatment and must be recorded as a liability. Accordingly, the Company classifies the warrant instrument as a liability at its fair value. This liability is subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date until exercise, redemption or expiration, and any change in fair value is recognized in the Company’s statements of operations.

Ordinary Shares Subject to Possible Conversion

The ordinary public shares contain a redemption feature. In accordance with ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” (“ASC 480”), redemption provisions not solely within the control of the Company require the security to be classified outside of permanent equity.

Accordingly, 3,500,000 of the 4,000,000 public shares were classified outside of permanent equity at redemption value because the redemption rights are subject to the occurrence of certain events that are outside of the Company’s control. The redemption value at October 31, 2013 was equal to approximately the pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account ($10.40 per share at October 31, 2013).

Status as Emerging Growth Company

We are an emerging growth company as defined in the JOBS Act. As an emerging growth company, we have elected to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As such, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates.

Results of Operations

Six Months Ended April 30, 2014 and 2013

Our entire activity from inception up to the closing of our initial public offering on December 21, 2012 was in preparation for that event. Since the offering, our activity has been limited to the evaluation of business combination candidates, and we will not be generating any operating revenues until the closing and completion of our initial business combination. We expect to generate small amounts of non-operating income in the form of interest income on cash and cash equivalents.

We incurred net losses of $265,132 and $4,068,131, for the six months ended April 30, 2014 and April 30, 2013, respectively. Our net losses for the six months ended April 30, 2014 and April 30, 2013 included (i) legal and professional fees of $234,406 and $23,332, respectively, which were incurred principally in connection with our formation, the pursuit of our Acquisition Transaction and to comply with our public company reporting obligations, (ii) amounts paid to CIS Acquisition Holding Co. Ltd. for office space, administrative services and secretarial support of $45,000 and $30,000, (iii) general and administrative expenses of $38,506 and $26,780 and (iv) a benefit (charge) of $45,000 and ($3,995,000) to record the change in fair value and initial fair value, of the warrant derivative liability for public warrants and the placement warrants (See discussion below).

While preparing its balance sheet as of April 30, 2013, the Company identified and corrected an error related to the accounting for the Company’s outstanding warrants. The amount of the error was approximately $3,570,000 as of December 21, 2012. The Company determined that its outstanding warrants should have been accounted as a liability recorded at fair value and that this liability should be re-measured at each reporting period with changes in fair value being reflected in the statement of operations. The determination of this accounting methodology was made as a result of potential adjustments to the exercise price of the warrants in certain circumstances as described in the warrant agreements which do not meet the criteria for equity treatment described in ASC 815-45-7D.

In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Staff Accounting Bulletin Nos. 99 and 108 (“SAB 99” and “SAB 108”), the Company has evaluated these errors, based on an analysis of quantitative and qualitative factors, as to whether they were material to each of the prior reporting periods affected and if amendments of previously filed Reports of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K with the SEC are required. The Company has determined that though quantitatively and qualitatively material to the previously furnished balance sheet dated December 21, 2012 on Form 6-K filed with the SEC on December 28, 2012, the Company believes the recording of the warrants as liability instruments would not have influenced an investor’s decision making process and has determined to record the liability as of April 30, 2013, as opposed to a restatement and reissuance of the previously furnished balance sheet. For the six months ended April 30, 2013, the charge of $3,995,000 for the fair value of the warrant liability represents the effect of the fair value upon issuance of $3,570,000, plus the adjustment to fair value of $425,000 through April 30, 2013.

Year ended October 31, 2013 Compared to the Period November 28, 2011(inception) through October 31, 2012

Our entire activity from inception up to the closing of our initial public offering on December 21, 2012 was in preparation for that event. Since the offering, our activity has been limited to the evaluation of business combination candidates, and we will not be generating any operating revenues until the closing and completion of our initial business combination. We expect to generate small amounts of non-operating income in the form of interest income on cash and cash equivalents.

We incurred net losses of $3,429,198, $4,873 and $3,434,071 for the year ended October 31, 2013, for the period November 28, 2011 (inception) through October 31, 2012 and for the period from November 28, 2011 (inception) through October 31, 2013, respectively. Our net losses for the year ended October 31, 2013, for the period November 28, 2011 (inception) through October 31, 2012 and for the period from November 28, 2011 (inception) through October 31, 2013 included (i) legal and professional fees of $95,252, $4,873 and $100,125 which were incurred principally in connection with our formation, the pursuit of an Acquisition Transaction and to comply with our public company reporting obligations, (ii) amounts paid to CIS Acquisition Holding Co. Ltd. for office space, administrative services and secretarial support of $75,000, $0 and $75,000, (iii) general and administrative expenses of $43,567, $0 and $43,567, which included a charge of $5,000 for a theft loss in connection with an unrecovered loss from an unauthorized bank transaction and (iv) a charge of $3,230,000, $0 and $3,230,000 to record the fair value of the warrant derivative liability for public warrants and the placement warrants (See discussion below).

As discussed above, while preparing its balance sheet as of April 30, 2013, the Company identified and corrected an error related to the accounting for the Company’s outstanding warrants. The amount of the error was approximately $3,570,000 as of December 21, 2012.

In accordance with SEC SAB 99 and SAB 108, the Company has evaluated these errors, based on an analysis of quantitative and qualitative factors, as to whether they were material to each of the prior reporting periods affected and if amendments of previously filed Reports of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K with the SEC are required. The Company has determined that though quantitatively and qualitatively material to the previously furnished balance sheet dated December 21, 2012 on Form 6-K filed with the SEC on December 28, 2012 , the Company believes the recording of the warrants as liability instruments would not have influenced an investor’s decision making process and has determined to record the liability in the year ended October 31, 2013, as opposed to a restatement and reissuance of the previously furnished balance sheet. The charge of $3,230,000 to record the fair value of the warrant liability represents the effect of the fair value upon issuance of $3,570,000, net of the adjustment to fair value of $340,000 through October 31, 2013.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

The net proceeds from our IPO and Private Placement, after deducting offering expenses of $718,809 and underwriting discounts of $720,000, were $41,938,911. Of this amount, $41,600,000 was placed in the trust account. The remaining $338,191 of net proceeds not in trust have been and will continue to be used for working capital purposes.

We intend to use the net proceeds of our initial public offering and private placement sale of warrants, including the funds held in the trust account, to acquire a target business and to pay our expenses relating thereto. To the extent that our capital stock is used in whole or in part as consideration to effect a business combination, the remaining proceeds held in the trust account as well as any other net proceeds not expended will be used as working capital to finance the operations of the target business. Such working capital funds could be used in a variety of ways including continuing or expanding the target business’ operations, for strategic acquisitions and for marketing, research and development of existing or new products. Such funds could also be used to repay any operating expenses or finders’ fees, which we had incurred prior to the completion of our business combination if the funds available to us outside of the trust account were insufficient to cover such expenses.

Generally, the proceeds held in the trust account will not be released to us until the earlier of our completion of an initial business combination and our redemption of 100% of the outstanding public shares upon our failure to consummate a business combination within the required time period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there can be released to us from the trust account (1) any interest earned on the funds in the trust account that we need to pay our income or other tax obligations and (2) any remaining interest earned on the funds in the trust account that we need for our working capital requirements.

As of April 30, 2014, we had $12,648 in our operating bank accounts and $41,622,401 in restricted cash and equivalents held in trust to be used for an initial business combination. As of April 30, 2014, we have not withdrawn from the trust account any interest income for our working capital and tax obligations. As of April 30, 2014, $22,401 of the amount on deposit in the trust account represents interest income, which was available to be withdrawn by us as described above. As of September 16, 2014, all of our funds are held in cash.

Until consummation of our initial business combination, we will be using the funds not held in the trust account, plus the interest earned on the trust account balance that may be released to us to fund our working capital requirements, for identifying and evaluating prospective acquisition candidates, performing business due diligence on prospective target businesses, traveling to and from the offices, plants or similar locations of prospective target businesses, reviewing corporate documents and material agreements of prospective target businesses, selecting the target business to acquire and structuring, negotiating and consummating the business combination. We believe the funds not held in trust, plus the interest earned on the trust account balance that may be released to us, plus the remaining borrowing capacity under our loan agreement with CIS Acquisition Holding Co. Ltd., will be sufficient to fund our operations through at least September 21, 2014, assuming we have not consummated a business combination during that period of time.

If our estimates of the costs of undertaking in-depth due diligence and negotiating our initial business combination is less than the actual amount necessary to do so, or the amount of interest available to us from the trust account is less than we expect as a result of the current interest rate environment, we may have insufficient funds available to operate our business prior to our initial business combination. Moreover, we may need to obtain additional financing either to consummate our initial business combination or because we become obligated to redeem a significant number of our public shares upon consummation of our initial business combination, in which case we may issue additional securities or incur debt in connection with such business combination. Subject to compliance with applicable securities laws, we would only consummate such financing simultaneously with the consummation of our initial business combination. In the current economic environment, it has become especially difficult to obtain acquisition financing. Following our initial business combination, if cash on hand is insufficient, we may need to obtain additional financing in order to meet our obligations.

We anticipate that we will need to use all of the remaining funds in cash as well as entering into contingent fee arrangements with our vendors in order to meet the expenditures required for operating our business until we consummate our initial business combination. We may need to raise additional capital through loans or additional investments from our sponsors, officers, directors or third parties. Our sponsors, officers and directors are not obligated to loan us funds as may be required. If we consummate our initial business combination, we would repay such loaned amounts. In the event that the initial business combination does not close, we may use a portion of the remaining proceeds held outside the trust account to repay such loaned amounts, but no proceeds from our trust account would be used for such repayment. Accordingly, we may not be able to obtain additional financing. If we are unable to raise additional capital, we may be required to take additional measures to conserve liquidity, which could include, but not necessarily be limited to, curtailing operations, suspending the pursuit of our business plan, and controlling overhead expenses. We cannot provide any assurance that new financing will be available to us on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Commencing on December 18, 2012 and ending upon the consummation of a business combination or our liquidation, we have agreed to pay to CIS Acquisition Holding Co. Ltd. a total of $7,500 per month for office space, administrative services and secretarial support for a period commencing on the date of the IPO and ending on the earlier of our consummation of an acquisition transaction or our liquidation. Such fees have been paid as incurred only out of interest earned on the trust account or assets not held in trust, if any. If there are insufficient funds from interest earned on the trust account or from assets not held in trust, then the obligation to CIS Acquisition Holding Co. Ltd. will be accrued and not paid. During the six months ended April 30, 2014 and April 30, 2013, the Company has incurred $45,000 and $30,000, respectively, for these office space expenses to CIS Acquisition Holding Co., Ltd.

On March 24, 2014, we entered into an agreement with CIS Acquisition Holding Co. Ltd., under which for one year we may borrow up to $300,000 with no interest. All amounts borrowed under this agreement are due March 23, 2015. On March 25, 2014, May 12, 2014 and June 11, 2014, we borrowed $30,000, $10,000 and $120,000 under this borrowing arrangement. As of April 30, 2014 and September 16, 2014, a balance of $30,000 and $35,000, respectively, was outstanding under this loan.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of April 30, 2014.

Notes:

Note:

(1) This property has been mortgaged to the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Zhenjiang Branch. The period of the mortgage is one year commencing from June 20, 2014 and ending on June 19, 2015. During the term of the mortgage, Delta’s rights to transfer, lease, mortgage or otherwise dispose of this property shall be subject to the prior written approval of the relevant bank.

As of the date of this report, Delta does not lease any properties.

Delta believes there are no regulatory requirements or environmental issues that may materially affect its utilization of the above properties and fixed assets, all of which are located in the PRC.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares as of September 19, 2014, giving effect to the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement:

Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all ordinary shares beneficially owned by them. The following table does not include securities underlying warrants or options that are not exercisable within 60 days of September 19, 2014. All shares have identical voting rights.

*Less than one percent

Does not include ordinary shares underlying the warrants underlying the units sold in the IPO and the placement warrants which will not become exercisable within the next 60 days.

Below is a summary of the business experience of each of our executive officers and directors:

Xin Chao has over 10 years of experience in the fine chemical industry. From 1999 to 2000, Mr. Chao worked as a sales manager at Sinopec International Corporation where he was actively involved in international trading matters. From 2000 to 2002, he worked at Lianshui County Zhengxin Chemical Co., Ltd. as the general manager in charge of the entire business operations of the company. Subsequently, in August 2002 and August 2003, Mr. Chao co-founded (i) Danyang Beijiate Materials Trading (“Beijiate Materials”) and (ii) Danyang Beijiate Chemicals Co., Ltd. (“Beijiate Chemicals”) respectively, where he was responsible for the daily operations of both Beijiate Materials and Beijiate Chemicals. Mr. Chao co-found Jiangsu Delta, and he was the general manager of Jiangsu Delta when it was incorporated as a wholly foreign-owned enterprise on 15 June 2007. Mr. Chao subsequently acquired the entire equity interest in Jiangsu Delta from S&S International through Hong Kong Huilong International Investment Limited (formerly known as Hong Kong Zhengxin International Investment Limited) (which was controlled by Mr. Chao) on 13 April 2008. Since its incorporation, Mr.Chao has been actively involved in the operations and management of Jiangsu Delta. Mr. Chao Xin graduated from Nanjing University with a Bachelor’s Degree in International Trading.

Hong Yan has been serving as the chief financial officer of Delta Advanced Materials Limited since May 2011. He is responsible for the preparation of all financial statements as well as for reviewing and developing effective financial policies and control procedures for Delta. From 1997 to 2002, Mr Yan was the Assistant Manager in the Financial Advisory Services Department of KPMG Shanghai, where he was responsible for carrying out statutory audits, rendering an in depth understanding of the International Financial Reporting Standards. From 2002 to 2004, Mr Yan served as the Financial Controller of Hartcourt Companies Inc, where he supervised the company’s accounts department. Hartcourt Companies Inc, which is listed on the US Stock Exchange, distributes computer hardware and peripherals made by Samsung Electronics in Shanghai. From 2004 to 2006, he assumed the position of Vice President of Finance of Sancon Resources Recovery Inc, an environmental service and waste management company that operates recycling facilities in China and Australia, where he was responsible for overseeing the financial and accounting matters of the company, as well as liaising with and reporting to the US Securities and Exchange Commission in relation to compliance issues. Sancon Resources Recovery Inc is also listed on the US Stock Exchange. From 2006 to 2011, Mr Yan served as the managing partner of Shanghai KRC Business Consulting Co., Ltd., a consultancy on audit, tax and advisory services which he co-founded and still co-owns. Mr. Yan graduated with a Bachelor’s Degree in Accounting and a Masters of Business Administration, both from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and is a member of the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

Changguang Wu has been with Delta as its Executive Director since 2007 and has been actively involved in the daily operations of Delta since its establishment in 2007. From 1989 to 1992, Mr. Wu was a loan officer of People’s Bank of Danyang City. From 1992 to 2002, he worked as a chief planner at Danyang City Trust and Investment Co., Ltd. Subsequently, in August 2002 and August 2003, Mr. Wu co-founded (i) Danyang Beijiate Materials Trading (“Beijiate Materials”) and (ii) Danyang Beijiate Chemicals Co., Ltd. (“Beijiate Chemicals”) respectively with Mr. Chao Xin, where he was mainly responsible for the management of both Beijiate Materials and Beijiate Chemicals. While he was involved in the management of Beijiate Materials and Beijiate Chemicals, he was also the general manager of Danyang Liansheng Chemicals Co., Ltd. (“Liansheng Chemicals”). He officially left Liansheng Chemicals and joined the Target Group in November 2007. Mr. Wu graduated from Banking School of Jiangsu in 1989 with a diploma in Economic Management.

David Chi-Ping Chow is currently the General Manager for China at Interclients LLC and a partner at Shanghai China Bay Partners. Mr. Chow is a United States Certified Public Accountant and an American Certified Tax Practitioner. He has 27 years of experience in financial planning, corporate internal control and audit, strategic planning and implementation. Mr. Chow previously has worked as the Chief Financial Officer for China at General Mills and Haagen-Dazs, Xian Janssen Pharmaceutical (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson group), respectively. He was the Chief Financial Officer for Greater China of Pillsbury and Haagen-Dazs, the Chief Financial Officer for China and Vice-President of Supply Chain for Nabisco. He was a partner of Speakman & Price public accounting firm and a financial analyst of Motorola. Mr. Chow graduated with a Bachelor in Accounting from Santa Clara University, California. He also received management training from Columbia University and Northwestern University.

Richard Liu has over twenty years’ expense in business and legal practice. He is a partner and director of securities investment section of Shanghai Huiye Law Firm since December 12, 2006. He was a legal assistant at Baker& McKenzie’s Shanghai office from May 2004 through October 2006. Prior to that, he was Senior Consultant of Overseas Consulting department, Shanghai Foreign Service Company from June 2001 to April 2004. He received his bachelor’s degree in law from the Art College of Shanghai University.

George Kaufman is a Managing Director of Investment Banking with Chardan Capital Markets, LLC, a New York based investment bank. Mr. Kaufman is a director of Prime Acquisition Corp., a company that owns and operates office, commercial and industrial properties in Italy and is focused on building a portfolio of high-yield assets primarily in Europe. Mr. Kaufman founded Detroit Coffee Company, LLC, a national roaster, wholesaler and retail distributor of high-end specialty coffees, in January 2002 and currently serves as its chief executive officer. Mr. Kaufman received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from the University of Vermont in 1999.

Our current directors and executive officers, their ages and positions are as follows:

Below is a summary of the business experience of each of our executive officers and directors:

Anatoly Danilitskiy has been our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since our inception. From 2004 to 2009, Mr. Danilitskiy established and led National Reserve Corporation, or NRC, to consolidate its strategic non-banking investment assets to become one the Russia’s largest private holding companies. Also from 2004 to 2009, Mr. Danilitskiy served as Chairman of CIS Interfincom AG, a financial and asset management subsidiary of NRC, where he oversaw all major money market transactions and securities trading. While at NRC, Mr. Danilitskiy was responsible for a number of key deals in energy (including but not limited to purchasing certain Gazprom assets), transportation, debt arbitrage and distressed assets. From 1994 to 2004, Mr. Danilitskiy served as First Deputy Chairman of National Reserve Bank, or NRB, the parent company of NRC and one of Russia’s leading universal commercial banks, where he was responsible for business development and international affairs. From 2006 to 2009, Mr. Danilitskiy served as Member of Board of Directors and member of Renumeration and Assessment Committee of Aeroflot International Airlines, a Russian national carrier, where he played a key role in the successful effort to modernize the fleet of aircraft.

Since 2007, Mr. Danilitskiy has served as a Member of the Supervisory Board of Energobank and is a majority shareholder of the bank. In June 2012, he was appointed to serve as Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Energobank. Mr. Danilitskiy has also served as Chairman of the Board of RetnNet, an international telecommunications network, since 2010. From 1993 to 1994, Mr. Danilitskiy was a co-founder of “Russia Investment and Financial Company.” Mr. Danilitskiy previously served as a career diplomat from 1974 to 1993 in the then Soviet and later Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, having been posted at the embassies in India, Australia and Great Britain. He retired in 1993 with a rank of Senior Counselor. Mr. Danilitskiy graduated from Moscow State Institute of International Relations with an MA degree in International Politics in 1974. He is fluent in English, Russian and French.

Kyle Shostak has been our Director and Chief Financial Officer since our inception and our Secretary since January 2012. Since March 2009, Mr. Shostak has served as Principal and Managing Director at Navigator Principal Investors LLC, a New York-based alternative investment advisor, responsible for originating and structuring deals as well as managing clients’ separate accounts. Since 2009, Mr. Shostak has also served as Chief Investment Officer of Insurance Opportunity Fund, a special situations investment vehicle focused on global insurance assets that is managed by Navigator Principal Investors LLC.

From 2008 to 2009, Mr. Shostak served as Vice President of Fixed Income Investments at J.P. Morgan Securities, focusing on client-related structuring, trading and distribution of hybrid and illiquid assets. Mr. Shostak’s deals involved structuring, financing and sourcing certain fixed income assets to several major hedge funds, special situations and private equity funds, including BlueCrest funds (approximately $860 million), and selling down certain Bear Stearns’ illiquid legacy assets (approximately $1.5 billion) to a consortium of hedge funds and private equity investors. At J.P. Morgan, Mr. Shostak also managed risk for proprietary investments in excess of $250 million.

From 2006 to 2008, Mr. Shostak was Director of Alternative Investments at GE Capital-Genworth Financial, where he was responsible for direct investments, co-investments in leveraged assets, hedge funds, distressed credits, private equity and private debt. From 2003 to 2006, Mr. Shostak served as Vice President of Leveraged Finance at Credit Suisse and from 2000 to 2003 served as Associate Director for Leveraged Finance & Financial Sponsors at Banca Intesa New York. His deals involved high yield bonds and leveraged loans offerings, bi-lateral facilities, syndications, special situations equity deals, including, among others, Chiquita, Georgia Pacific, American Towers, Petrobras, MexCel, Michael Foods, Reliant Energy, Luxxotica, Armani, Benetton, Fiat, Finmatica, ENI, Petrobras, Blue Stream Pipeline.

From 1995 to 1999, Mr. Shostak first worked as Vice President and then Director and General Counsel at Bank Austria/Creditanstalt Investment Bank Russia. While there Mr. Shostak was involved in all aspects of origination and execution of equity investments in a number of prominent Russian companies, including AVISMA-VSMPO, Syvtyvkar Pulp, Sylvinit, asset consolidation of Tyumen Oil Company, proprietary investments in government debt obligations, investments in structured notes representing shares of Gazprom and Sberbank. Mr. Shostak performed pre-investment due diligence and negotiated terms of the deals. Mr. Shostak also served as Director of Emerging Russia Growth Fund, a $150 million bank-sponsored opportunistic equity fund.

From 1994 to 1995, Mr. Shostak was an Associate at Covington & Burling in Washington, D.C. While there he was involved in corporate, insurance and international practices, including project financing facility on behalf of Novorossiysk Shipping Co.

Mr. Shostak obtained a Master of Business Administration in Finance degree from Stern School of Business at New York University in 2000, a Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree from The American University, Washington, D.C. in 1994 and a J.D. degree from Moscow State University Faculty of Law in 1993. He has been certified for the Series 7 license from FINRA and is fluent in English, Russian and Italian.

Taras Vazhnov has been our Director since our inception. From 2003 to 2010, Mr. Vazhnov was a co-founder and Head of Corporate Finance of Moscow-based Link Capital, a boutique investment bank that provides a variety of strategic advisory, capital markets and asset management services to companies operating primarily in Russia and Central Eastern Europe. Since 2006, Mr. Vazhnov has continued to serve as a director of Link Capital Financial Services Ltd., a related financial advisory firm. In March 2012, Mr. Vazhnov became a partner of Link Capital LLP (UK). Mr. Vazhnov is currently serving as an advisor on strategy and business development to the German TV and internet company IMusic as well as a number of prominent Russian companies, including one of the largest private medical clinics in Russia, Lit-Clinic, and a commercial bank, NM Bank.

From 2002 to 2003, Mr. Vazhnov served as a First Deputy CEO and CFO of Russian Coal Co., one of the largest coal companies in Russia, where he led the finance, M&A and legal departments and participated in more than 15 acquisitions in the coal mining and related industries. From 2001 to 2002, Mr. Vazhnov was a co-founder and General Manager of Business Center Asset Management Co., a private investment and asset management firm in Moscow that invested in the Chernigovsky Coal Mine, Bank Moskva, and other industrial assets. From 2000 to 2001, Mr. Vazhnov served as First Vice-President of Commercial Bank Moskva, where he was in charge of the bank’s credit policy and risk management. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Vazhnov served as Head of Financial Assets Department at Evihon Oil Co., a subsidiary of Moscow Oil and Gas Company, owned by the Moscow City Government, where he was responsible for the company’s financial assets management. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Vazhnov served as co-founder, Senior Manager and deputy CEO of MIR Investment Co., a corporate finance and brokerage services firm. Mr. Vazhnov graduated from Plekhanov Academy of Economy in Moscow in 1993 with a Master degree in Economics and Finance. He is fluent in English and Russian.

Levan Vasadze has been our Director since March 2012. Since 2008, Mr. Vasadze has been Chairman and majority owner of Prometheus Capital Partners, a Moscow-based private equity firm focused on investments in Russian and CIS companies. In 2010, Prometheus acquired majority stakes in the Beethoven and ZooBoom pet product retail chains and merged them under the Beethoven brand into the largest pet product retail chain in Russia.

From 2001 to 2007, Mr. Vasadze was Chairman and later CEO of Sistema Corporation's insurance subsidiary, Rosno, a top Russian insurer. From 2001 to 2006, Mr. Vasadze was First Vice President of the conglomerate Sistema Corporation, one of Russia’s largest private companies. As First Vice President, Mr. Vasadze was a member of the management board and the senior-most executive other than the CEO, in charge of corporate strategy and development, sourcing, review and execution of new acquisitions. During his tenure, he also served on the boards of numerous subsidiaries of Sistema. Mr. Vasadze joined Sistema in 1998 as Vice President. From 1997 to 1998, Mr. Vasadze was Managing Director of Corporate Finance at Aton Investment Bank, a leading Russian investment bank. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Vasadze was Director at Creditanstalt Investment Bank in Moscow, at the time a major Western investment bank in Eastern Europe. Mr. Vasadze graduated from Tbilisi State University majoring in Geophisics in 1992. He obtained an MBA from Emory University Business School in Atlanta, Georgia in 1995. He is fluent in Russian, Georgian and English.

David R. Ansell , has been our director since April 2012. Mr. Ansell spent 32 years at Citibank, with portions of his career in Africa, the Middle East and Asia. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Ansell was a CEO of Citibank Russia. He was in charge of managing all of Citibank’s businesses in Russia including the 100% owned subsidiary with branches in Moscow, St. Petersburg, and the Investment Bank activities of Salomon Smith Barney. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Ansell was CEO of Citibank in Czech Republic, and managed all of Citibank’s businesses there. In 1993 to 1995, Mr. Ansell was Chief of Staff: Emerging Markets at Citibank London. From 1991 to 1993 Mr. Ansell was based in Taipei, Taiwan for Citibank as a Country Manager — Corporate and Investment Banking, overseeing a staff of 300 people and assets in access of $1.5 billion. In 1989 – 1991, Mr. Ansell was CEO of Ecobank Transnational in Lome, Togo. In 1986 – 1989, Mr. Ansell served as Regional Director of Citibank in Nairobi, Kenya. From 1968 to 1986, Mr. Ansell held various assignments at Citibank in South Africa, Zaire, Kenya, Tunisia, Ivory Coast, Saudi Arabia and India. His expertise includes all areas of corporate & investment banking — management, risk management and credit, operational processes, treasury, and human resources. As a Senior Credit Office of Citibank from 1982 until 1986, Mr. Ansell provided final approval authority of loans up to US$5 million, and up to US$25 million with one other Senior Credit Officer.

Since 2001, Mr. Ansell has served on the Board of Directors of Housing Finance Corporation in Kenya, where he also serves as Chair of the Audit Committee. Since February 2012, Mr. Ansell has served as a director and member of the Credit and Risk Committees of Equity Bank (Kenya). Since 2006 he has also been an Advisory board member of Private Equity New Markets, a Danish private Equity Fund operated by BankInvest.

Mr. Ansell graduated in 1967 from the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, with a Bachelor’s degree in mathematics. In 1968 he obtained another Bachelor’s degree in Finance from the Thunderbird International Graduate School in Glendale, Arizona. In 1988, Mr. Ansell received an Advanced Management degree from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.

The term of each director does not automatically expire.

Board Committees

Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a compensation committee and a governance and nominating committee.

Audit Committee .  Immediately following the transaction contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, the audit committee will consist of David Chi-Ping Chow, Richard Liu and George Kaufman. David Chi-Ping Chow is the chair of the audit committee, and our board of directors believe that Mr. Chow qualify as “audit committee financial experts”, as such term is defined in the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The board of directors has adopted an audit committee charter, providing for the following responsibilities of the audit committee:

Compensation Committee .  Immediately following the transaction contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, our compensation committee will consist of David Chi-Ping Chow, Richard Liu and George Kaufman. The members of the compensation committee do not have any direct or indirect material relationship with us other than as a director.

Our board of directors adopted a compensation committee charter, providing for the following responsibilities of the compensation committee:

Governance and Nominating Committee .  Immediately following the transaction contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, our governance and nominating committee will consist of David Chi-Ping Chow, Richard Liu and George Kaufman. The members of the governance and nominating committee do not have any direct or indirect material relationship with us other than as a director.

Our board of directors adopted a governance and nominating committee charter, providing for the following responsibilities of the governance and nominating committee:

In making nominations, the governance and nominating committee is required to submit candidates who have the highest personal and professional integrity, who have demonstrated exceptional ability and judgment and who shall be most effective, in conjunction with the other nominees to the board, in collectively serving the long-term interests of the stockholders. In evaluating nominees, the governance and nominating committee is required to take into consideration the following attributes, which are desirable for a member of the board: leadership, independence, interpersonal skills, financial acumen, business experiences, industry knowledge, and diversity of viewpoints.

Code of Ethics

On March 19, 2012, our board of directors adopted a code of ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees.

Director Independence

Our board of directors has determined that David Chi-Ping Chow, Richard Liu and George Kaufman qualify as independent directors under the rules of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules because they are not currently employed by us, and do not fall into any of the enumerated categories of people who cannot be considered independent in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Delta

Director Compensation

Delta currently does not pay any compensation to members of its board of directors. Future compensation to be paid to its directors, if any, will be determined in the future.

Executive Compensation

Overview of Executive Compensation

Delta pays annual base salaries to each of Xin Chao, Changguang Wu, Jianmin Xia, Ming Chao, and Hong Yan of approximately RMB367,967, RMB238,907, RMB170,292, RMB29,443, and HK$480,000, respectively, in 2013. We pay annual base salaries to each of Xin Chao, Changguang Wu, Jianmin Xia, Ming Chao, and Hong Yan of RMB368,889 RMB239,829, RMB57,040, RMB117,624, and HK$480,000, respectively, in 2012.

Grants of Plan Based Awards

None of the named executives of Delta currently participates in or have account balances in any plan based award programs. Future bonus plans will be adopted by the board of directors.

Employment Agreements

On June 15, 2007, Delta entered into an employment agreement with Xin Chao pursuant to which Xin Chao agreed to act as its chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The employment agreement does not have a definite term. The employment agreement provides for a base salary of RMB462,000 a year, with performance based bonus.

On June 15, 2007, Delta entered into an employment agreement with Changguang Wu pursuant to which Changguang Wu agreed to act as its general manager. The employment agreement does not have a definite term. The employment agreement provides for a base salary of RMB289,920 a year, with performance based bonus.

On September 1, 2012, Delta entered into an employment agreement with Jianmin Xia pursuant to which Jianmin Xia agreed to act as its general manager. The employment agreement has a term beginning September 1, 2012 and ending December 31, 2017. The employment agreement provides for a base salary of RMB180,000 a year, with performance based bonus.

On October 1, 2012, Delta entered into an employment agreement with Ming Chao pursuant to which Ming Chao agreed to act as its general financial manager. The employment agreement has a term of three years. The employment agreement provides for a base salary of RMB156,000 a year, with performance based bonus.

On May 1, 2012, Delta entered into an employment agreement with Yan Hong pursuant to which Yan Hong agreed to act as its Chief Financial Officer. The employment agreement has a term of three years. The employment agreement provides for a base salary of RMB$480,000 a year, with performance based bonus.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End; Option Exercises and Stock Vested

As of the date hereof, none of the named executives of Delta have held compensation based options to purchase interests in Delta or other awards with values based on the value of Delta.

Pension Benefits

None of the named executives of Delta currently participates in or has account balances in qualified or nonqualified defined benefit plans sponsored by Delta.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

None of the named executives currently participates in or has account balances in nonqualified defined contribution plans or other deferred compensation plans maintained by Delta.

CIS

None of our directors or officers have received any cash compensation for services rendered to us. Our founders own an aggregate of 1,000,000 Class A Shares, which they acquired for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000. In addition, we issued our founders and their assignees, in a private placement occurring immediately prior to the consummation of the IPO, 4,500,000 warrants for aggregate consideration of $3,375,000. We believe that because our officers and directors own such shares and warrants, no compensation (other than reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses) is necessary, and such persons have agreed to serve in their respective role without compensation.

We have agreed to pay to CIS Acquisition Holding Co. Ltd. a total of $7,500 per month for office space, administrative services and secretarial support for a period commencing on the date of the IPO and ending on the earlier of our consummation of an acquisition transaction or dissolution and liquidation of the trust account in the event we do not consummate an acquisition transaction within the relevant time period. Such fees have been paid as incurred only out of interest earned on the trust account or assets not held in trust, if any. If there are insufficient funds from interest earned on the trust account or from assets not held in trust, then the obligation to CIS Acquisition Holding Co. Ltd. will be accrued and not paid. CIS Acquisition Holding Co. Ltd. is an affiliate of Anatoly Danilitskiy, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Taras Vazhnov, our director. This arrangement was agreed to by the board of directors for our benefit and is not intended to provide Messrs. Danilitskiy or Vazhnov compensation.

Other than this $7,500 per month fee, no compensation of any kind, including finder’s and consulting fees, will be paid to our officers, directors or any of their respective affiliates for services rendered prior to or in connection with an acquisition transaction. However, our officers, directors and their respective affiliates will receive reimbursement for any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection with identifying, investigating and consummating a potential acquisition transaction with one or more target businesses. There are no limitations on the amount of expenses for which they can seek reimbursement, provided such expenses were incurred for our benefit. There will be no review of the reasonableness of the expenses by anyone other than our board of directors, which includes persons who may seek reimbursement, or a court of competent jurisdiction if such reimbursement is challenged. To the extent such out-of-pocket expenses exceed the available proceeds not deposited in the trust account, such out-of-pocket expenses would not be reimbursed by us unless we consummate our initial acquisition transaction.

Although we currently anticipate that some members of our management team will remain with us post-acquisition transaction, some or all of our current executive officers and directors may or may not remain with us following our initial acquisition transaction, depending on the type of business acquired and the industry in which the target business operates. After the acquisition transaction, our directors and officers who remain with us may be paid consulting, management or other fees from the combined company with any and all amounts being fully disclosed to shareholders, to the extent then known, in the prospectus/proxy solicitation or tender offer materials furnished to our shareholders. It is unlikely that the amount of such compensation will be known at the time of an acquisition transaction, as it will be up to the directors of the post-transaction business to determine executive and director compensation. We cannot assure you that our current executive officers and directors will be retained in any significant role, or at all, and have no ability to determine what remuneration, if any, will be paid to them if they are retained following our initial acquisition transaction.

We have not set aside any amount of assets for pension or retirement benefits.

Any compensation to be paid to our chief executive officer and other officers will be determined, or recommended to the board of directors for determination, either by a compensation committee constituted solely by independent directors or by a majority of the independent directors on our board of directors.

Employment Agreements

On January 10, 2012, we entered into an agreement with Kyle Shostak and CIS Acquisition Holding Co. Ltd., our majority shareholder, pursuant to which we and CIS Acquisition Holding Co. Ltd. agreed that Mr. Shostak shall serve as our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and a director until the closing of an initial acquisition transaction. We also agreed to sell to Mr. Shostak 110,250 placement warrants immediately prior to the consummation of this offering on the same terms as are offered to CIS Acquisition Holding Co. Ltd. In the event that the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters in this offering is not exercised in full, Mr. Shostak agreed to return for cancellation a pro-rata portion of the Class C Shares he holds immediately prior to the consummation of this offering. Mr. Shostak does not receive any other compensation for services rendered to us, other than reimbursements for business-related expenses incurred in the course of his duties as our officer.

Other than as disclosed above, we have not entered into any employment agreements with our executive officers, and have not made any agreements to provide benefits upon termination of employment.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

As of June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012, Delta had short-term borrowings from banks which were repayable within one year and charged at interest rates ranging from 3.9% to 8.7%, from 2.5% to 9.0% and from 2.5% to 10.4% per annum, respectively. Such borrowings primarily consist of loans denominated in Renminbi, and U.S. dollars. Bank borrowings are secured over certain bank deposits, certain trade receivables, certain plant and machinery, and certain land use rights. The bank borrowings are guaranteed by a number of unrelated parties, as well as Mr. Wu Changguang for the year ended June 30, 2014 and Mr. Chao Xin, the immediate and ultimate controlling party of Delta for the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Delta is not involved in any other legal proceedings. Delta has no knowledge of any proceedings pending or threatened against any of its subsidiaries or any facts likely to give rise to any litigation, claims or proceedings which might have a material effect on its financial position or profitability.

Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

Our units, shares and warrants have been listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbols CISAU, CISAA and CISAW, since December 19, 2012. The following tables set forth, for the calendar quarters indicated and through September 12, 2014, the high and low sale prices for our units, shares and warrants, as reported on NASDAQ for the periods presented.

(1) Such shares and warrants were eligible to begin separately trading on March 18, 2012.

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

The holders of all of the outstanding Elite Shares immediately prior to or at the time of Closing shall sell each of their Elite Shares to CIS and CIS shall issue an aggregate of 6,060,000 shares of the CIS Common Stock as payment for the Elite Shares. The Purchase Price shall be paid as follows: (i) 4,560,000 shares of CIS Common Stock shall be issued at closing; plus (ii) an additional 1,500,000 shares of the Earnout Payment Shares shall be issued and placed in escrow pursuant to an Escrow Agreement and released based upon the meeting of certain net income performance targets as specified in the Purchase Agreement and summarized below.

The Earnout Payment Shares, if any, will be issued as follows: (a) 500,000 shares shall be issued if the Company achieves Adjusted Net Income of at least $8 million for the period starting July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015; (b) 500,000 shares shall be issued if the Company achieves Adjusted Net Income of at least $9.2 million for the period starting July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2016; (c) 500,000 shares shall be issued if the Company achieves Adjusted Net Income of at least $10.6 million for the period starting July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017. Further, during the thirteen (13) months post-closing, all material acquisitions made by the Company must be accretive to Company earnings, i.e. the price/earnings paid by the Company for an acquisition target must be lower than the price/earnings of the Company on the date of such acquisition. A “material acquisition” is an acquisition that would, when comparing the most recent annual financial statements of each company, result in a change of 5% or more to the Company’s revenue, net income, total liabilities or total assets. To be “accretive”, an acquisition must be acquired at a P/E ratio that is at a 20% discount to the P/E ratio at which the Company is trading (based on the last sales price) on the day prior to the date that the definitive agreement for the acquisition is signed. The Net Income Targets are to be met on an all-or-nothing basis, and there shall be no partial awards.

Concurrently with the Acquisition, CIS will issue 500,000 shares of CIS Common Stock to the CIS Sponsor.

The above referenced securities were offered and sold in reliance on the exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(a)(2) and Regulation S under the Securities Act and corresponding provisions of state securities laws.

Amendment to CIS Placement Warrants

In connection with the Acquisition, the CIS Sponsor shall amend the 4,500,000 CIS Placement Warrants owned by the CIS Sponsor to provide that such warrants may be redeemed in the event CIS Common Stock trades at a price of $17.50 per share for a period of ten (10) consecutive trading days and that such warrants may not be exercised on a cashless basis.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

The section entitled “Description of Securities” in our registration statement, as amended, on Form F-1 (Registration No 333-180224), initially filed with the SEC on March 20, 2012, is incorporated by reference herein.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The audited financial statements of Delta for the years ended June 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014 are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.3. The audited financial statements of CIS for the year ended October 31, 2013, and for the period November 28, 2011 (Inception) and the unaudited CIS financial statements for the six months ended April 30, 2014 and 2013 are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.2.

The Pro Forma Financial Information concerning the acquisition of the business operations of Delta appears below.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CIS Acquisition Ltd. (“CIS”) is providing the following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information to aid you in your analysis of the financial aspects of the Acquisition.

The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet combines the audited consolidated historical statement of financial position of Delta Advanced Materials Limited (“Delta”) as of June 30, 2014 with the unaudited historical balance sheet of CIS as of April 30, 2014, giving effect to the Acquisition as if it had been consummated as of June 30, 2014.

The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations combines the audited historical statement of operations and comprehensive income of Delta for the year ended June 30, 2014 with the unaudited historical statement of operations of CIS for the year ended April 30, 2014, giving effect to the Acquisition as if it had occurred on July 1, 2013.

The historical financial information has been adjusted to give effect to pro forma events that are related and/or directly attributable to the Acquisition, are factually supportable and are expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results. The adjustments presented on the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been identified and presented to provide relevant information necessary for an accurate understanding of the combined company upon consummation of the Acquisition.

The historical financial statements of Delta and CIS have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and presented in US Dollars. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements included herein are prepared under US GAAP and presented in US Dollars. Following the consummation of the Acquisition, the combined entity intends to prepare its consolidated financial statements under US GAAP and present such consolidated financial statements in US Dollars.

The historical financial information of Delta was derived from the audited financial statements of Delta for the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012, included elsewhere in this Report of Foreign Private Issuer. The historical financial information of CIS was derived from the unaudited financial statements of CIS as of and for the six months ended April 30, 2014 and the audited financial statements of CIS for the year ended October 31, 2013, for the period from November 28, 2011 (inception) through October 31, 2012 and for the period from November 28, 2011 (inception) through October 31, 2013, included elsewhere in this Report of Foreign Private Issuer. This information should be read together with Delta’s and CIS’s financial statements and related notes, ” Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Delta ,” Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of CIS ” and other financial information included elsewhere in this Report of Foreign Private Issuer.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is for illustrative purposes only. The financial results may have been different had the companies always been combined. You should not rely on the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information as being indicative of the historical results that would have been achieved had the companies always been combined or the future results that the combined company will experience.

In the Acquisition, CIS will acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Elite Ride Limited (“Elite”), of which Delta is a wholly owned subsidiary. As a result, following the Acquisition, Delta will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of CIS. In exchange, the holders of the all of the outstanding shares of Elite immediately prior to the Acquisition will receive consideration consisting of:

(i) 6,060,000 shares of CIS common stock (the “CIS Share Consideration”). Of the CIS Share Consideration, 4,560,000 shares will be fully vested and issued upon the closing, and 1,500,000 shares (“Earnout Shares”) will be issued and held in escrow and shall be released from escrow if the post merger Company’s adjusted net income (as defined) meets the targets as follows: (a) 500,000 shares shall be released from escrow based if the Company achieves Adjusted Net Income of at least $8 million for the period starting July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015, (b) 500,000 shares shall be released from escrow if the combined company achieves Adjusted Net Income of at least $9.2 million for the period starting July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2016 and (c) 500,000 shares shall be released from escrow based if the combined company achieves Adjusted Net Income of at least $10.6 million for the period starting July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017.

(ii) upon the exercise of the CIS outstanding public warrants and warrants issued to the CIS Sponsor, the Company shall distribute the proceeds of any such exercise to the former holders of Delta, (as defined) (“Warrant Proceeds Consideration”). In connection with the Closing, 4,500,000 warrants owned by the CIS Sponsor (“Placement Warrants”) were amended to (a) provide that such Placement Warrants may be redeemed at a price of $17.50 per share, and (b) provide that such Sponsor Warrants may not be exercised on a cashless basis, and

(iii) CIS and the CIS Sponsor shall enter into a call agreement (the “Call Agreement”) mutually acceptable to the Company, the former holders of Delta and the CIS Sponsor pursuant to which the Company shall be permitted, on a date which is between the 360 ^th and 390 ^th after the Closing Date, to require the CIS Sponsor to sell to it, at a price of $5.00 per share, up to 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Call Option”).

Concurrently with the Acquisition, CIS will issue 500,000 shares of CIS Common Stock to Kyle Shostak and CIS Acquisition Holding Co. Ltd. (collectively, the “CIS Sponsor”) and (the “CIS Sponsor Shares”), proportionally in accordance with their ownership in CIS. In addition, if the 10 trading day volume weighted average price of the CIS Common Stock (the “VWAP”) is lower than $5.00 per share on the principal stock exchange on which such stock is traded on the earlier to occur of (i) the 395th day after the closing and (ii) the 30th day after the SEC declares a registration statement filed by CIS effective during the first 12 months after the closing,  then CIS will issue the CIS Sponsor, proportionally in accordance with their respective share ownership in CIS, an additional number of shares of CIS Common Stock equal to  (i) $5.00 minus the VWAP, divided by the VWAP, multiplied by (ii) the lesser of (a) 1,500,000 and (b) the total number of shares of CIS Common Stock owned by CIS Sponsor on such date. The total number of CIS Common Stock will be reduced by the number of shares CIS Sponsor sells during 13 months post-closing.

The pro forma balance sheet reflects the issuance of the CIS Acquisition Share Consideration and the CIS Sponsor Shares, but does not reflect the Warrant Proceeds Consideration or the shares which might be exchanged in connection with the Call Option.

Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition, the holders of Delta or their affiliates shall purchase by no later than the closing date, 500,000 shares of CIS’s Class A shares from public shareholders and that Delta shall have (a) indebtedness for borrowed money not in excess of $85,000,000 as of the Closing Date, (b) no shareholder indebtedness (c) trade and other payables not in excess of $40,000,000, (d) advances from customers not in excess of $2,000,000, (e) tax and deferred tax liabilities not in excess of $2,500,000, (f) dividend payable of $35,000,000 and (g) not less than $7,500,000 in unrestricted cash on the balance sheet post dividend.

As a result of the Acquisition, assuming that no stockholders of CIS elect to convert their shares into cash, the former holders of Delta will own approximately 48.0% of CIS’s common stock to be outstanding immediately after the Acquisition, and the other CIS stockholders will own approximately 52.0% of CIS’s outstanding common stock, based on the number of shares of CIS common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2014. If 3,500,000 of the public shares are converted into cash assuming maximum conversions, the former holders of Delta will own approximately 72.0% and the other CIS stockholders will own approximately 28.0% of CIS’s common stock to be outstanding immediately after the acquisition.

The Acquisition will be accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with US GAAP. Under this method of accounting, CIS will be treated as the “acquired” company for financial reporting purposes. This determination was primarily based on Delta comprising the ongoing operations of the combined entity, Delta senior management comprising the senior management of the combined company, and the former holders of Delta having a controlling interest in terms of the voting power of the combined entity. In accordance with guidance applicable to these circumstances, the Acquisition will be considered to be a capital transaction in substance. Accordingly, for accounting purposes, the Acquisition will be treated as the equivalent of Delta issuing stock for the net assets of CIS, accompanied by a recapitalization. The net assets of CIS will be stated at historical cost, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded. Operations prior to the Acquisition will be those of Delta.

CIS cannot predict how many of its public stockholders will elect to convert their shares to cash. As a result, it has elected to provide pro forma financial statements under two different assumptions which produce significant differences in cash and stockholders’ equity. The actual results are likely to be in between the results shown, but there can be no assurance that will be the case. Pursuant to the share exchange agreement, either CIS or Delta may terminate the share exchange agreement if holders of more than 87.5% public shares sought conversion of such shares.

Separate pro forma information has been presented assuming the following circumstances: (1) no holders of CIS common stock exercise their right to have their shares converted upon the consummation of the Acquisition; (2) holders of 3,500,000 shares of CIS common stock elect to have their shares converted upon the consummation of the Acquisition at the conversion price of approximately $10.40 per share (which is a full pro rata share of the trust account as of April 30, 2014).

Included in the weighted average shares outstanding as presented in the pro forma condensed combined financial statements are 4,560,000 shares of CIS common stock (assuming no conversions of common stock) and 4,560,000 shares of CIS common stock (assuming full conversions of common stock) to be issued to the former holders of Delta in exchange for their shares in Delta. The weighted average shares outstanding exclude 1,500,000 shares that are held in escrow and are subject to forfeiture.