As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 25, 2016

Registration No. 333-214148

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Amendment No. 4 to
FORM S-11

 

FOR REGISTRATION
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
OF SECURITIES OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE COMPANIES

 

INNOVATIVE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Governing Instruments)

 

17190 Bernardo Center Drive
San Diego, California 92128
(858) 997-3332

(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

 

Paul E. Smithers
President and Chief Executive Officer
INNOVATIVE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
17190 Bernardo Center Drive
San Diego, California 92128
(858) 997-3332

(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)

 

With copies to:

Martin Traber, Esq. Carolyn Long, Esq. Curt Creely, Esq. FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 100 North Tampa Street, Suite 2700 Tampa, Florida 33602 Tel: (813) 229-2300 Fax: (813) 221-4210		Kerry E. Johnson, Esq. DLA PIPER LLP (US) 1251 Avenue of the Americas 27 th Floor New York, New York 10020 Tel: (212) 335-4500 Fax: (212) 335-4501

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

If any of the Securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act, check the following box. o

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box. o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale thereof is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED NOVEMBER 25, 2016

PROSPECTUS

5,000,000 Shares

Class A Common Stock

Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. is a newly-formed, self-advised Maryland corporation focused on the acquisition, ownership and management of specialized industrial properties leased to experienced, state-licensed operators for their regulated medical-use cannabis facilities.

This is our initial public offering. We are selling 5,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock.

We expect the initial public offering price of our Class A common stock to be $20.00 per share. Prior to this offering, no public market exists for our shares. We have been approved to list our shares of Class A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance, under the symbol “IIPR.”

We have been organized and we intend to elect, and to operate our business so as to qualify and to be taxed as a real estate investment trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or REIT, commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2016 or, if later, the first year in which we have material real estate assets and operations. Shares of our Class A common stock will be subject to restrictions on ownership and transfer that are intended, among other purposes, to assist us in qualifying and maintaining our qualification as a REIT, including, subject to certain exceptions, a 9.8% ownership limit. See the section entitled “Description of Securities — Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer.”

We are an “emerging growth company” under federal securities laws and will be subject to reduced public company reporting requirements. Investing in our Class A common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should purchase our Class A common stock only if you can afford a complete loss of your investment. See the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 15 of this prospectus for a discussion of the risks you should consider before buying shares of our Class A common stock. Some of these risks include:

•

We were recently formed, have no operating history and may not be able to operate our business successfully or generate sufficient cash flow to make or sustain distributions to our stockholders.

•

We do not currently own any properties. We have identified only one property to acquire and have not entered into binding contracts or commitments to acquire any other specific properties or committed a substantial portion of the net proceeds of this offering to any other specific investment in medical-use cannabis facilities. Investors will not be able to evaluate the economic merits of investments we make with a substantial portion of the net proceeds of this offering before purchasing our Class A common stock.

•

We may be unable to invest the proceeds of this offering on acceptable terms, or at all.

•

Medical-use cannabis remains illegal under federal law, and therefore, strict enforcement of federal laws regarding medical-use cannabis would likely result in our inability and the inability of our tenants to execute our respective business plans.

•

New laws that are adverse to the business of our tenants may be enacted, and current favorable state or local laws relating to cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis may be modified or eliminated in the future.

•

We are dependent on our key personnel for our success. The departure of any of our executive officers or key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business.

•

Our growth depends on external sources of capital, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all.

•

Our real estate investments will consist of primarily industrial properties suitable for cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis, which may be difficult to sell or re-lease upon tenant defaults or early lease terminations, either of which would adversely affect returns to stockholders.

•

Investors participating in this offering will incur immediate and substantial dilution.

•

Our failure to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT would subject us to U.S. federal income tax and applicable state and local taxes, which would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders and may have significant adverse consequences on the market price of our Class A common stock.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

		Per Share				Total
Public offering price		$				$
Underwriting discount (1)		$				$
Proceeds, before expenses, to us		$				$

(1)

Includes a structuring fee equal to 0.50% of the gross proceeds of this offering. The terms of our arrangements with the underwriters are described under the section entitled “Underwriting.”

The underwriters may also purchase up to an additional 750,000 shares of our Class A common stock from us at the public offering price, less the underwriting discount, within 30 days from the date of this prospectus solely to cover over-allotments, if any.

The underwriters expect to deliver the Class A common stock on or about         , 2016.

 

Ladenburg Thalmann			Compass Point

The date of this prospectus is             , 2016.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY			1
THE OFFERING			13
RISK FACTORS			15
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS			41
USE OF PROCEEDS			43
DISTRIBUTION POLICY			44
CAPITALIZATION			45
DILUTION			46
SELECTED HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION			47
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS			49
BUSINESS			54
OUR MANAGEMENT			72
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS			90
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS			91
POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES			94
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES			96
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF MARYLAND LAW AND OUR CHARTER AND BYLAWS			102
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE			107
OUR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP AND THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT			109
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS			111
ERISA CONSIDERATIONS			133
UNDERWRITING			137
LEGAL MATTERS			142
EXPERTS			142
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION			142
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS			F-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus, any free writing prospectus prepared by us or information to which we have referred you. We have not, and the underwriters have not, authorized any dealer, salesperson or other person to provide you with different or additional information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not, and the underwriters are not, making an offer to sell shares of our Class A common stock in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information contained in this prospectus and any free writing prospectus prepared by us is accurate only as of their respective dates or on the date or dates which are specified in these documents. Our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and prospects may have changed since those dates.

 

Market and Industry Data and Forecasts

In this prospectus, we use market data and industry forecasts and projections derived from cited third-party sources, which data and forecasts are publicly available for free. These sources generally state that the information they provide has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but that the accuracy and completeness of the information are not guaranteed. The forecasts and projections are based on industry surveys and the preparers’ experience in the industry and there can be no assurance that any of the forecasts or projections will be achieved. None of such data and forecasts was prepared specifically for us. No third-party source that has prepared such information has reviewed or passed upon our use of the information in this prospectus, and no third-party source is quoted or summarized in this prospectus as an expert. All statements contained in this prospectus in connection with or related to such data and forecasts are attributed to us, and not to any such third-party source or any other person. We believe that the surveys and market research others have performed are reliable, but neither we nor the underwriters have independently investigated or verified this information. Because the cannabis industry is relatively new, such market and industry data may be subject to significant change in a relatively short time period. Forecasts and other forward-looking information obtained from these sources are subject to the same qualifications and uncertainties as the other forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Market Opportunity

The Industrial Real Estate Sub-Market

The industrial real estate sub-market recently has performed well with vacancies in several markets at historical lows. According to Colliers International, or Colliers, the U.S. industrial property vacancy rate declined for the 22 ^nd consecutive quarter in the first quarter of 2016, declining 10 basis points to 6.3% and down 70 basis points from the first quarter of 2015. Almost 64 million square feet of industrial real estate was absorbed in the first quarter of 2016, an increase of 9.6% year over year, which resulted in increased rental rates for the 18 ^th consecutive quarter, according to Colliers.

We believe this supply/demand dynamic creates significant opportunity for owners of industrial facilities, particularly those focused on niche categories, as options are limited for tenants requiring specialized buildings. We intend to capitalize on this opportunity by purchasing specialized industrial properties that are mission critical to the medical-use cannabis industry.

The Regulated Medical-Use Cannabis Industry

The regulated medical-use cannabis industry is a rapidly growing industry that we believe presents a unique real estate investment opportunity under current market conditions. In the United States, the development and growth of the industry has generally been driven by state law and regulation, and accordingly, the market varies on a state-by-state basis. State laws that legalize and regulate medical-use cannabis allow patients to consume cannabis for medicinal reasons with a doctor’s recommendation subject to various requirements and limitations. States have authorized numerous medical conditions as qualifying conditions for treatment with medical-use cannabis, including but not limited to treatment for cancer, glaucoma, HIV/AIDs, wasting syndrome, pain, nausea, seizures, muscle spasms, multiple sclerosis, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), migraines, arthritis, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s, lupus, residual limb pain, spinal cord injuries, inflammatory bowel disease and terminal illness. As of November 15, 2016, 29 states, plus the District of Columbia, have passed laws allowing their citizens to use medical cannabis.

We believe that the following conditions create an attractive opportunity to invest in industrial real estate assets that support the regulated medical-use cannabis industry:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We plan to take advantage of this market opportunity by purchasing the medical-use cannabis facilities of state-licensed growers with a focus on properties that we believe also have potential for long-term appreciation in value. We believe that our sale-leaseback solutions offer an attractive alternative to licensed cultivators who lack access to traditional financing alternatives. We intend to acquire medical-use cannabis facilities in states that permit medical-use cannabis cultivation, including New York, Illinois, Washington, Oregon, Nevada, California, Arizona, Massachusetts and Maryland. We expect that acquisition opportunities will continue to expand as additional states legalize medical-use cannabis and license new cultivators.

Notwithstanding the foregoing market opportunity and trends, and despite legalization at the state level, we continue to believe that the current state of federal law creates significant uncertainty and potential risks associated with investing in medical-use cannabis facilities. For a more complete description of these risks, see the sections entitled “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Regulation” and “Business — Government Regulation.”

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe that we have the following competitive strengths:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Business Objectives and Growth Strategies

Our principal business objective is to maximize stockholder returns through a combination of (1) distributions to our stockholders, (2) sustainable long-term growth in cash flows from increased rents, which we hope to pass on to stockholders in the form of increased distributions, and (3) potential long-term appreciation in the value of our properties from capital gains upon future sale. Our primary strategy to achieve our business objective is to acquire and own a portfolio of medical-use cannabis facilities leased to tenants holding the requisite state licenses to operate in the regulated medical-use cannabis industry. This strategy includes the following components:

Our Target Markets

We anticipate that our initial target markets will be New York, Illinois, Washington, Oregon, Nevada, California, Arizona, Massachusetts and Maryland. We currently have a definitive agreement to purchase one medical-use cannabis cultivation facility in New York and non-binding letters of intent to purchase one medical-use cannabis cultivation facility in Illinois and four medical-use cannabis cultivation facilities in California.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following is a list of states that have legalized cannabis for medical use in some form as of November 15, 2016:

Year (1)		Jurisdiction (1)				Population as of July 1, 2015 (in millions) (2)
1996			California				39.1
1998			Washington				7.2
1998			Oregon				4.0
1999			Alaska				0.7
1999			Maine				1.3
2000			Hawaii				1.4
2000			Colorado				5.5
2000			Nevada				2.9
2004			Vermont				0.6
2004			Montana				1.0
2006			Rhode Island				1.1
2007			New Mexico				2.1
2008			Michigan				9.9
2010			District of Columbia				0.7
2010			New Jersey				9.0
2010			Arizona				6.8
2011			Delaware				0.9
2012			Massachusetts				6.8
2012			Connecticut				3.6
2013			Illinois				12.9
2013			New Hampshire				1.3
2014			Maryland				6.0
2014			Minnesota				5.5
2014			New York				19.8
2016			Louisiana				4.7
2016			Pennsylvania				12.8
2016			Ohio				11.6
2016			Florida				20.3
2016			Arkansas				3.0
2016			North Dakota				0.8
Total			30				203.3

It is expected that new states that entered the marketplace in 2016, may drive industry growth in 2018 and 2019, when cannabis businesses in such states could begin to generate revenues. Experience shows that it generally takes one to two years for a state to establish regulations and for cannabis businesses to begin to generate revenue from operations. ArcView’s projected increase in legal cannabis sales by 2020 is, in part, attributable to this delay between legalization and revenue generation. In addition, continued development of the regulated medical-use cannabis industry depends upon continued legislative authorization of medical-use cannabis at the state level. Progress in the regulated medical-use cannabis industry, while encouraging, is not assured and any number of factors could slow or halt progress in this area.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Target Properties

We intend to acquire specialized industrial real estate assets operated by state-licensed medical-use cannabis growers through sale-leaseback transactions and third-party purchases. In sale-leaseback transactions, concurrently upon closing of the acquisition, we will lease the properties back to the state-licensed growers under long-term, triple-net lease agreements. We intend to target properties owned by growers that have been among the top candidates in the rigorous state licensing process and have been granted one or more licenses to operate multiple facilities. Based on our review of potential acquisitions in connection with this offering, indoor cultivation facilities generally appear to have similar shells as standard light industrial buildings. However, based on our initial diligence, the medical-use cultivation process typically requires a finely tuned environment to achieve consistent high quality and specificity in cannabinoid levels and to maximize yields, which translates into certain capital improvements in the building’s infrastructure. These improvements can include enhanced HVAC systems for climate and humidity control, high capacity plumbing systems, specialized lighting systems, and sophisticated building management, cultivation monitoring and security systems. Through this sale-leaseback strategy, we will serve as a source of capital to these licensed medical-use cannabis growers, which will allow them to redeploy their sale proceeds back into their core operations to grow their business and achieve higher returns.

Our Initial Property

We have entered into a definitive purchase agreement for the acquisition of our Initial Property, a 127,000-square foot industrial property located in Montgomery, New York for a purchase price of approximately $30 million. We expect to acquire our Initial Property with the net proceeds of this offering. While the acquisition of our Initial Property is subject to ongoing diligence and the satisfaction of closing conditions, at this time, we have determined that the acquisition of our Initial Property is “probable.” There can be no assurance, however, that we will consummate the acquisition of our Initial Property on the terms anticipated, or at all.

Property Description.   Our Initial Property consists of approximately 37 acres of usable land, which includes three buildings comprising approximately 127,000 square feet. Our Initial Property is also expected to support the future development of additional medical-use cannabis cultivation facilities totaling approximately 204,000 additional square feet. The current property owner and future tenant is licensed by the state of New York to operate a medical-use cannabis cultivation and processing facility, and has operated such facility at the property since June 2016, when construction of the facility was substantially completed.

Acquisition Terms.   On August 22, 2016, we entered into a definitive purchase agreement to acquire our Initial Property from PharmaCann LLC in a sale-leaseback transaction for an aggregate purchase price of $30 million. The purchase price for our Initial Property was determined by negotiation with the seller after taking into consideration the expected annualized lease revenue, expected lease, operating history, age and condition of the property, and other relevant factors. We paid a $375,000 deposit upon execution of the purchase agreement that is refundable in the event we do not close our initial public offering within a specified timeframe. The $375,000 deposit was paid on our behalf by IGP Advisers (as defined below) and is to be repaid with the proceeds of this offering. The definitive agreement provides for a due diligence period during which we have the right to access and inspect the property and may terminate the agreement if we determine that the property does not meet our criteria. Following the diligence period, we have agreed to purchase the property “as is,” subject to all faults and conditions thereon, which increases the risk that we may have to remedy defects or costs without recourse to the prior owner. The closing of the purchase is subject to the completion of this offering and customary closing conditions. The purchase agreement provides that closing is to occur within 30 days after the expiration of the due diligence period and the agreement is terminable at the option of either party thereafter. We intend to purchase our Initial Property as soon as reasonably practicable after satisfaction of all closing conditions, including the closing of this offering.

Lease Terms.   Upon the closing of the acquisition, we will lease 100% of our Initial Property to the seller of the property, PharmaCann LLC, to operate a medical-use cannabis cultivation and processing facility in compliance with applicable state and local law and in compliance with the terms of the tenant’s license from the state of New York. PharmaCann LLC is a start-up business that commenced retail operations in late 2015. PharmaCann LLC secured one of only five licenses granted to date in New York for the cultivation and

TABLE OF CONTENTS

dispensing of medical-use cannabis. As of the date of this prospectus, PharmaCann LLC operates two cultivation and processing facilities and four registered medical-use cannabis dispensaries in Illinois, and one cultivation and processing facility and four registered medical-use cannabis dispensaries in New York. The lease for our Initial Property is a triple-net lease, with the tenant responsible for paying all structural repairs, maintenance expenses, insurance and taxes related to the property. The base rent is approximately $319,580 per month, which shall be increased annually at a rate based on the higher of (i) 4% or (ii) 75% of the consumer price index, or CPI. We also receive a property management fee under the lease equal to 1.5% of the then-current base rent throughout the term, and supplemental base rent for the first five years of the term at a rate of $105,477 per month. Together, the annualized initial base rent, property management fee and supplemental base rent equate to approximately 17.2% of the purchase price of our Initial Property. The lease term is 15 years, with two options to extend the term of the lease for two additional five-year periods. As a start-up business, PharmaCann LLC has not been profitable. During 2016, we expect that PharmaCann LLC will continue to incur losses as its expenses increase in connection with the expansion of PharmaCann LLC’s operations. As a result, at least initially, we expect that PharmaCann LLC will make rent payments to us from proceeds from the sale of the property or cash on hand, and not from funds from operations.

Our Financing Strategy

We intend to meet our long-term liquidity needs through cash flow from operations and the issuance of equity and debt securities, including common stock, preferred stock and long-term notes. Where possible, we also may issue limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership to acquire properties from existing owners seeking a tax-deferred transaction. We expect to issue equity and debt securities at times when we believe that our stock price is at a level that allows for the reinvestment of offering proceeds in accretive property acquisitions. We may also issue common stock to permanently finance properties that were previously financed by debt securities. However, we cannot assure you that we will have access to the capital markets at times and on terms that are acceptable to us. Our investment guidelines initially provide that our aggregate borrowings (secured and unsecured) will not exceed 50% of the cost of our tangible assets at the time of any new borrowing, subject to our board of directors’ discretion.

Risk Management

We estimate that we will purchase approximately five to 10 properties with the net proceeds of this offering and will attempt to diversify the investment size and location of our portfolio of properties in order to manage our portfolio-level risk. Over the long term, we intend that no single property will exceed 25% of our total assets and that no single tenant will exceed 30% of our total assets. However, we do not expect to achieve these long-term targets with the net proceeds of this offering.

We expect that single tenants will occupy our properties pursuant to triple-net lease arrangements in general and, therefore, the success of our investments will be materially dependent on the financial stability of these tenants. We intend to target tenants that have been among the top candidates in the state licensing process and have been granted one or more licenses to operate multiple facilities. We expect, however, that most of our tenants will be start-up businesses that have little or no revenue and, at least initially, will make rent payments to us from the sale proceeds of a sale-leaseback transaction with us or cash on hand. We expect to evaluate the credit quality of our tenants and any guarantors on an ongoing basis by reviewing, where available, the publicly filed financial reports, press releases and other publicly available industry information regarding our tenants and any guarantors. In addition, we will monitor the payment history data for all of our tenants and, in some instances, we intend to monitor our tenants by periodically conducting site visits and meeting with the tenants to discuss their operations. In many instances, we will generally not be entitled to financial results or other credit-related data from our tenants. See the section entitled “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline, and you may lose some or all of your investment. Some of the more significant risks relating to this offering and an investment in our shares of Class A common stock include:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Operating Structure

We were formed as a Maryland corporation on June 15, 2016. We intend to conduct business in an umbrella partnership real estate investment trust, or UPREIT, structure through our Operating Partnership. We are the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership and, upon completion of this offering, we will own, directly or through a subsidiary, 100% of the limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership. Our board of directors will oversee our business and affairs.

Our Operating Partnership was formed as a Delaware limited partnership on June 20, 2016 and will commence operations upon the completion of this offering. Following the completion of this offering, substantially all of our assets will be held by, and our operations will be conducted through, our Operating Partnership. We will contribute the net proceeds from this offering to our Operating Partnership in exchange for limited partnership interests. Our interest in our Operating Partnership will generally entitle us to share in cash distributions from, and in the profits and losses of, our Operating Partnership in proportion to our percentage ownership, which is currently 100%. As the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership, we generally will have the exclusive power under the partnership agreement to manage and conduct our Operating Partnership’s business and affairs. In the future, we may issue limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership from time to time in connection with property acquisitions, as compensation or otherwise.

IGP Advisers LLC, or IGP Advisers, a company that is owned by Mr. Gold and Paul E. Smithers, our president, chief executive officer and a director nominee, and Gregory J. Fahey, our chief accounting officer and treasurer, is funding certain of our organization, offering and other costs. In addition, IGP Advisers funded an earnest money deposit pursuant to the purchase agreement for our Initial Property. IGP Advisers will seek reimbursement from us for these expenses upon completion of this offering and the acquisition of our Initial Property.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The chart below reflects our corporate structure after giving effect to this offering and the issuance of shares of our Class A common stock as described in this prospectus, including (i) 150,000 shares of Class A common stock that our executive chairman may purchase in this offering at the public offering price and (ii) grants of an aggregate of 27,500 shares of Class A common stock to two of our executive officers under our 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, or the Incentive Plan, that are expected to be approved at the first meeting of the compensation committee of our board of directors after completion of this offering.

Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer of our Securities

In order for us to qualify as a REIT under the Code, the relevant sections of our charter provide that, after completion of this offering and subject to certain exceptions, no person or entity may own, or be deemed to own, by virtue of the applicable constructive ownership provisions of the Code, more than 9.8% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the aggregate of our outstanding shares of stock or more than 9.8% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding common stock or any class or series of our outstanding preferred stock. Our board of directors may, upon receipt of certain representations, undertakings and agreements and in its sole discretion, exempt (prospectively or retroactively) any person from the 9.8% ownership limits and establish a different limit, or excepted holder limit, for a particular person if the person’s ownership in excess of the ownership limits will not then or in the future result in us failing the “closely held” test under Section 856(h) of the Code (without regard to whether the person’s interest is held during the last half of a taxable year) or otherwise cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT. Our charter further prohibits any person from beneficially or constructively owning, applying certain attribution rules of the Code, shares of our stock that would result in us failing the “closely held” test under Section 856(h) of the Code (without regard to whether the stockholder’s interest is held during the last half of a taxable year) or otherwise cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT, and any person from transferring shares of our stock if such transfer would result in shares of our stock to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons (determined without reference to any rules of attribution).

If any transfer of shares of our stock would result in shares of our stock to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons, such transfer will be void from the time of such purported transfer and the intended transferee will acquire no rights in such shares. In addition, if any purported transfer of shares of our stock or any other event would otherwise result in any person violating the ownership limits or such other limit established by our board of directors or, our company to be “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Code (without regard to whether the stockholder’s interest is held during the last half of a taxable year) or otherwise failing to qualify as a REIT, then that number of shares (rounded up to the nearest whole share) that would

TABLE OF CONTENTS

cause us to violate such restrictions will automatically be transferred to, and held by, a charitable trust for the exclusive benefit of one or more charitable organizations selected by us, and the intended transferee will acquire no rights in such shares.

Federal Income Tax Status

We intend to elect and qualify to be taxed as a REIT commencing with our tax year ending December 31, 2016 or, if later, the first year in which we have material real estate assets and operations. In addition, we may hold certain of our assets through taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs, which are subject to corporate-level income tax at regular rates. Our qualification as a REIT depends on our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, through actual investment and operating results, various complex requirements under the Code, relating to, among other things, the sources of our gross income, the composition and values of our assets, our distribution levels and the concentration of ownership of our shares of stock. We believe that we have been organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code, and that our proposed method of operation will enable us to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT.

So long as we qualify as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our REIT taxable income we distribute currently to our stockholders. Under the Code, REITs are subject to numerous organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that they distribute each year at least 90% of their REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year, and the statutory relief provisions of the Code do not apply, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates and may be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the subsequent four taxable years following the year during which we lost our REIT qualification. Distributions to stockholders in any year in which we are not a REIT would not be deductible by us, nor would they be required to be made. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income or property and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.

Distribution Policy

U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain (which does not equal net income as calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP), and that it pay U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that it annually distributes less than 100% of its taxable income. We are a newly formed company that has not commenced operations and, as a result, we have not paid distributions as of the date of this prospectus. To satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT and generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, we intend to make quarterly distributions of all or substantially all of our taxable income to holders of our common stock out of assets legally available therefor. However, we cannot assure you that distributions will be made or sustained. Any distributions we make will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon a number of factors, including our actual results of operations, economic conditions, maintenance of REIT qualification and the applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or the MGCL, and such other factors as our board may determine in its sole discretion.

Lock-up Agreements

We and each of our executive officers and directors have agreed with the underwriters not to offer, sell or otherwise dispose of any common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for or repayable with common stock (including limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership) or any rights to acquire common stock for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus, without first obtaining the written consent of Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., the representative of the underwriters.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Implications of Being an “Emerging Growth Company”

We qualify as an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or the JOBS Act. An “emerging growth company” may take advantage of specified reduced reporting requirements and is relieved of certain other significant requirements that are otherwise generally applicable to public companies. While we are an “emerging growth company,” among other things:

We have elected to use an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards, and this election is irrevocable. We have not made a decision whether to take advantage of other exemptions. If we do take advantage of additional exemptions, some investors may find our Class A common stock less attractive, which may result in a less active trading market for our Class A common stock and a more volatile stock price.

We could remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our Class A common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period.

Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 17190 Bernardo Center Drive, San Diego, CA 92128. Our telephone number is (858) 997-3332. Our website is www.innovativeindustrialproperties.com . The information found on, or otherwise accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this prospectus or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

our intention to qualify as a REIT. These investments are expected to provide a lower net return than we seek to achieve from investments in our target assets. Any significant delay in investing the net proceeds of this offering would have a material adverse effect of our ability to generate cash flow and make distributions to our stockholders.

Additionally, as a public company, we will be subject to the ongoing reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. Pursuant to the Exchange Act, we may be required to file with the SEC financial statements of properties we acquire or financial statements of our tenants who have entered into triple-net leasing arrangements with us for a significant portion of our properties. To the extent any required financial statements are not available or cannot be obtained, we will not be able to acquire the property. As a result, we may be unable to acquire certain properties that otherwise would be a suitable investment. We could suffer delays in our acquisition of suitable properties due to these reporting requirements.

We expect that most of our tenants, including the proposed tenant for our Initial Property, will be start-up businesses and may be unable to pay rent with funds from operations or at all, which could adversely affect our cash available to make distributions to our stockholders or otherwise impair the value of your investment.

We expect that single tenants will occupy our properties and, therefore the success of our investments will be materially dependent on the financial stability of these tenants. We expect that our future tenants will be independent medical-use cannabis cultivation operators about which there is generally little or no publicly available operating and financial information. As a result, we will rely on our management team to perform due diligence investigations of their tenants and their properties, operations and prospects. We may not learn all of the material information we need to know regarding these businesses through our investigations. As a result it is possible that we could enter into a sale-leaseback arrangement with tenants or otherwise lease properties to tenants that ultimately are unable to pay rent to us, which could adversely impact our cash available for distributions.

We expect that most of our tenants, including the proposed tenant for our Initial Property, will be start-up businesses that have little or no revenue when they enter triple-net leasing arrangements with us and therefore, may be unable to pay rent with funds from operations. For example, PharmaCann LLC, the proposed tenant for our Initial Property, is not profitable and has experienced losses since inception. As a result, we expect that our tenants (including PharmaCann LLC) will make initial rent payments to us from proceeds from the sale of the property, in the case of sale-leaseback transactions, or other cash on hand. In addition, in general, as start-up businesses, we expect our tenants will be more vulnerable to adverse conditions resulting from federal and state regulations affecting their businesses or industries and will have limited access to traditional forms of financing.

Some of our tenants may have also been recently restructured using leverage acquired in a leveraged transaction or may otherwise be subject to significant debt obligations. Tenants that are subject to significant debt obligations may be unable to make their rent payments if there are adverse changes in their business plans or prospects, the regulatory environment in which they operate or in general economic conditions. Tenants that have experienced leveraged restructurings or acquisitions will generally have substantially greater debt and substantially lower net worth than they have prior to the leveraged transaction. In addition, the payment of rent and debt service may reduce the working capital available to leverage entities and prevent them from devoting the resources necessary to move from the start-up phase of their business into actual operations and profitability. Furthermore, we may be unable to monitor and evaluate tenant credit quality on an on-going basis.

Any lease payment defaults by a tenant could adversely affect our cash flows and cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to stockholders. In the event of a default by a tenant, we may also experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-leasing our property as operators of medical-use cannabis cultivation and production facilities are generally subject to extensive state licensing requirements. Furthermore, we will not operate any of the facilities that we purchase.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Competition for the acquisition of properties suitable for the cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis may impede our ability to make acquisitions or increase the cost of these acquisitions, which could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

We will compete for the acquisition of properties suitable for the cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis with other entities engaged in agricultural and real estate investment activities, including corporate agriculture companies, cultivators and producers of medical-use cannabis, real estate companies and private real estate investors. These competitors may prevent us from acquiring desirable properties or may cause an increase in the price we must pay for properties. Our competitors may have greater resources than we do and may be willing to pay more for certain assets or may be willing to accept more risk than we believe can be prudently managed. In particular, larger companies may enjoy significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies. Our competitors may also adopt transaction structures similar to ours, which would decrease our competitive advantage in offering flexible transaction terms. In addition, due to a number of factors, including but not limited to potential greater clarity of the laws and regulations governing medical-use cannabis by state and federal governments, the number of entities and the amount of funds competing for suitable investment properties may increase, resulting in increased demand and increased prices paid for these properties. If we pay higher prices for properties, our profitability may decrease, and you may experience a lower return on your investment. Increased competition for properties may also preclude us from acquiring those properties that would generate attractive returns to us.

There may only be a limited number of medical-use cannabis facilities operated by suitable tenants available for us to acquire, which could adversely affect the return on your investment.

We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering to purchase from licensed growers their medical-use cannabis facilities, which we then intend to lease to them under triple-net lease agreements. We also intend to target properties owned by growers that have been among the top candidates in the rigorous state licensing process and have been granted one or more licenses to operate multiple facilities. In light of the current regulatory landscape regarding medical-use cannabis, including but not limited to, the rigorous state licensing processes, limits on the number of licenses granted in certain states and in counties within such states, zoning regulations related to medical-use cannabis facilities, the inability of potential tenants to open bank accounts necessary to pay rent and other expenses and the ever-changing federal and state regulatory landscape, we may have only a limited number of medical-use cannabis facilities available to purchase that are operated by licensees that we believe would be suitable tenants. Our inability to locate suitable investment properties and tenants would have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate cash flow and make distributions to our stockholders.

Our growth will depend upon future acquisitions of real estate assets, and we may be unable to consummate acquisitions on advantageous terms.

Our growth strategy is focused on the acquisition of specialized industrial real estate assets on favorable terms as opportunities arise. Our ability to acquire these real estate assets on favorable terms is subject to the following risks:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our real estate portfolio will be concentrated in a limited number of properties, which subjects us to an increased risk of significant loss if any property declines in value or if we are unable to lease a property.

Based on the anticipated net proceeds to be received from this offering, the expected investment size and our senior management team’s experience in the marketplace, we estimate that we will purchase approximately five to 10 properties with the net proceeds of this offering. However, currently a substantial portion of the net proceeds of this offering is not committed to specific properties. To the extent we are able to leverage our investment acquisitions with borrowed funds, we will acquire additional properties with the net proceeds of borrowings, subject to our debt policy. One consequence of a limited number of investments is that the aggregate returns we realize may be substantially adversely affected by the unfavorable performance of a small number of leases or a significant decline in the value of any single property. Lack of diversification will increase the potential that a single underperforming investment could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows and the price we could realize from the sale of our properties. Because we expect that the properties we initially acquire will be geographically concentrated in New York, Illinois, Maryland, California, Arizona, Washington, Nevada, Massachusetts and Oregon, we will be subject to any adverse change in the political or regulatory climate in those states or specific counties where our properties are located, which could adversely affect our properties and our ability to lease properties.

We may acquire a property or properties, including our Initial Property, “as-is,” which increases the risk of an investment that requires us to remedy defects or costs without recourse to the prior owner.

We may acquire real estate properties, including our Initial Property, “as is” with only limited representations and warranties from the property seller regarding matters affecting the condition, use and ownership of the property. There may also be environmental conditions associated with properties we acquire of which we are unaware despite our diligence efforts. In particular, medical-use cannabis facilities may present environmental concerns of which we are not currently aware. If environmental contamination exists on properties we acquire or develops after acquisition, we could become subject to liability for the contamination. As a result, if defects in the property (including any building on the property) or other matters adversely affecting the property are discovered, including but not limited to environmental matters, we may not be able to pursue a claim for any or all damages against the property seller. Such a situation could harm our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

We expect that the properties that we initially acquire will be geographically concentrated in New York, Illinois, Maryland, California, Arizona, Washington, Nevada, Massachusetts and Oregon, and we will be subject to social, political and economic risks of doing business in these states and any other state in which we may own property.

We expect that the properties that we initially acquire will be geographically concentrated in New York, Illinois, Maryland, California, Arizona, Washington, Nevada, Massachusetts and Oregon. Circumstances and developments related to operations in these markets that could negatively affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations include, but are not limited to, the following factors:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If our properties’ access to adequate water and power supplies is interrupted, it could harm our ability to lease the properties for medical-use cannabis cultivation and production, thereby adversely affecting our ability to generate returns on our properties.

In order to lease the properties that we intend to acquire with the proceeds of this offering, these properties will require access to sufficient water and power to make them suitable for the cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis. Although we expect to acquire properties with sufficient access to water, should the need arise for additional wells from which to obtain water, we would be required to obtain permits prior to drilling such wells. Permits for drilling water wells are required by state and county regulations, and such permits may be difficult to obtain due to the limited supply of water in areas where we expect to acquire properties. Similarly, our properties may be subject to governmental regulations relating to the quality and disposition of rainwater runoff or other water to be used for irrigation. In such case, we could incur costs necessary in order to retain this water. If we are unable to obtain or maintain sufficient water supply for our properties, our ability to lease them for the cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis would be seriously impaired, which would have a material adverse impact on the value of our assets and our results of operations.

Historically, states that have legalized medical-use cannabis cultivation have typically required that such cultivation take place indoors. Indoor cultivation of medical-use cannabis requires significant power for growing lights and ventilation and air conditioning to remove the hot air generated by the growing lights. While outdoor and greenhouse cultivation is gaining acceptance in many states with favorable climates for such growth, we expect that a significant number of our properties will continue to utilize indoor cultivation methods. Any extended interruption of the power supply to our properties, particularly those using indoor cultivation methods, would likely harm our tenants’ crops, which could result in their inability to make lease payments to us for our properties. Any lease payment defaults by a tenant could adversely affect our cash flows and cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to stockholders.

Some of our tenants could be susceptible to bankruptcy, which would affect our ability to generate rents from them and therefore negatively affect our results of operations.

In addition to the risk of tenants being unable to make regular rent payments, certain of our tenants who may depend on debt could be especially susceptible to bankruptcy in the event that their cash flows are insufficient to satisfy their debt. Any bankruptcy of one of our tenants would result in a loss of lease payments to us, as well as an increase in our costs to carry the property.

Additionally, under bankruptcy law, a tenant who is the subject of bankruptcy proceedings has the option of continuing (“assuming”) or giving up (“rejecting”) any unexpired lease of non-residential real property. If a bankrupt tenant decides to give up (reject) a lease with us, any claim we might have for breach of the lease, excluding a claim against (1) collateral securing the lease, or (2) a guarantor guaranteeing lease obligations, would be treated as a general unsecured claim in the tenant’s bankruptcy case. The laws governing bankruptcy cases would impact the treatment of our general unsecured claim. Our claim would likely be capped at the amount the tenant owed us for unpaid rent prior to the bankruptcy unrelated to the termination, plus the greater of one year of lease payments or 15% of lease payments payable under the remaining term of the lease, but in no case more than three years of lease payments. In addition to the cap on our damages for breach of the lease, even if our claim is timely submitted to the bankruptcy court, there is no guaranty that the tenant’s bankruptcy estate would have funds to satisfy the claims of general unsecured creditors. Finally, a bankruptcy court could re-characterize a net lease transaction as a disguised secured lending transaction. If that were to occur, we would not be treated as the owner of the property, but might have additional rights as a secured creditor. This would mean our claim in bankruptcy court could be limited to the amount we paid for the property, which could adversely impact our financial condition.

Because our real estate investments will consist of primarily industrial properties suitable for cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis, our rental revenues will be significantly influenced by demand for these facilities generally, and a decrease in such demand would likely have a greater adverse effect on our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio.

Because our portfolio of properties will consist of industrial properties used in the regulated medical-use cannabis industry, we will be subject to risks inherent in investments in a single industry. A decrease in the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

demand for medical-use cannabis cultivation facilities would have a greater adverse effect on our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio. Demand for medical-use cannabis cultivation facilities has been and could be adversely affected by changes in current favorable state or local laws relating to cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis or any change in the federal government’s current enforcement posture with respect to state-licensed cultivation of medical-use cannabis, among others. To the extent that any of these conditions occur, they are likely to affect demand and market rents for medical-use cannabis cultivation facilities, which could cause a decrease in our rental revenue. Any such decrease could impair our ability to make distributions to you. We do not expect to invest in other real estate or businesses to hedge against the risk that industry trends might decrease the profitability of our medical-use cannabis cultivation facilities.

Our real estate investments will consist of primarily industrial properties suitable for cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis, which may be difficult to sell or re-lease upon tenant defaults or early lease terminations, either of which would adversely affect returns to stockholders.

While our business objectives consist of principally acquiring and deriving rental income from industrial properties used in the regulated medical-use cannabis industry, we expect that at times we will deem it appropriate or desirable to sell or otherwise dispose of certain properties we own. These types of properties are relatively illiquid compared to other types of real estate and financial assets. This illiquidity could limit our ability to quickly dispose of properties in response to changes in regulatory, economic or other conditions. Therefore, our ability at any time to sell assets may be restricted and this lack of liquidity may limit our ability to make changes to our portfolio promptly, which could materially and adversely affect our financial performance. We cannot predict the various market conditions affecting the properties that we expect to acquire that will exist in the future. Due to the uncertainty of regulatory and market conditions which may affect the future disposition of the real estate assets we expect to acquire, we cannot assure you that we will be able to sell these assets at a profit in the future. Accordingly, the extent to which we will realize potential appreciation on the real estate investments we expect to acquire will depend upon regulatory and other market conditions. In addition, in order to qualify as a REIT and maintain our REIT status, we may not be able to sell properties when we would otherwise choose to do so, due to market conditions or changes in our strategic plan.

Furthermore, we may be required to make expenditures to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold and we cannot assure you that we will have funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements. With these kinds of properties, if the current lease is terminated or not renewed, we may be required to make expenditures and rent concessions in order to lease the property to another tenant. In addition, in the event we are forced to sell or re-lease the property, we may have difficulty finding qualified purchasers who are willing to buy the property or tenants who are willing to lease the property. These and other limitations may affect our ability to sell or re-lease properties, which may adversely affect returns to our stockholders.

Liability for uninsured losses could adversely affect our financial condition.

While the terms of our leases with our tenants generally will require that they carry property and casualty insurance, losses from disaster-type occurrences, such as earthquakes, floods and weather-related disasters, may be either uninsurable or not insurable on economically viable terms. Should an uninsured loss occur, we could lose our capital investment or anticipated profits and cash flows from one or more properties.

Potential liability for environmental matters could adversely affect our financial condition.

We intend to purchase real estate and will be subject to the risk of liabilities under federal, state and local environmental laws. Some of these laws could subject us to:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We will generally include provisions in our leases making tenants responsible for all environmental liabilities and for compliance with environmental regulations, and we will seek to require tenants to reimburse us for damages or costs for which we have been found liable. However, these provisions will not eliminate our statutory liability or preclude third-party claims against us. Even if we were to have a legal claim against a tenant to enable us to recover any amounts we are required to pay, there are no assurances that we would be able to collect any money from the tenant. Our costs of investigation, remediation or removal of hazardous substances may be substantial. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances on one of our properties, or the failure to properly remediate a contaminated property, could adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the property or to borrow using the property as collateral. Additionally, we could become subject to new, stricter environmental regulations, which could diminish the utility of our properties and have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

Contingent or unknown liabilities could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

We may in the future acquire properties, subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if a claim were asserted against us based on ownership of any of these properties, we may have to pay substantial amounts to defend or settle the claim. If the magnitude of such unknown liabilities is high, individually or in the aggregate, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

The assets we will acquire may be subject to impairment charges.

We will periodically evaluate the real estate investments we acquire and other assets for impairment indicators. The judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based upon factors such as market conditions, tenant performance and legal structure. For example, the termination of a lease by a tenant may lead to an impairment charge. If we determine that an impairment has occurred, we would be required to make an adjustment to the net carrying value of the asset which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which the impairment charge is recorded.

We may own properties subject to ground leases that expose us to the loss of such properties upon breach or termination of the ground leases.

A ground lease agreement permits a tenant to develop and/or operate a land parcel (property) during the lease period, after which the land parcel and all improvements revert back to the property owner. Under a ground lease, property improvements are owned by the property owner unless an exception is created and all relevant taxes incurred during the lease period are paid for by the tenant. Ground leases typically have a long duration generally ranging from 50 to 99 years with additional extension options. As a lessee under a ground lease, we are exposed to the possibility of losing the property upon termination, or an earlier breach by us, of the ground lease, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and the trading price of our Class A common stock.

Due to our involvement in the regulated medical-use cannabis industry, we may have a difficult time obtaining the various insurances that are desired to operate our business, which may expose us to additional risk and financial liabilities.

Insurance that is otherwise readily available, such as workers’ compensation, general liability, and directors’ and officers’ insurance, is more difficult for us to find and more expensive, because we lease our properties to companies in the regulated medical-use cannabis industry. There are no guarantees that we will be able to find such insurances in the future, or that the cost will be affordable to us. If we are forced to go without such insurances, it may prevent us from entering into certain business sectors, may inhibit our growth, and may expose us to additional risk and financial liabilities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We cannot predict every event and circumstance that may affect our business, and therefore, the risks and uncertainties discussed herein may not be the only ones you should consider.

We are not aware of any other publicly-traded REIT that focuses on the acquisition, ownership and management of medical-use cannabis facilities. Therefore, as we commence the operation of our business, we may encounter risks of which we are not aware at this time, which could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Risks Related to Financing Our Business

Our growth depends on external sources of capital, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all. In addition, banks and other financial institutions may be reluctant to enter into lending transactions with us, particularly secured lending, because we intend to acquire properties used in the cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis. If this source of funding is unavailable to us, our growth may be limited and our levered return on the properties we purchase may be lower.

We intend to grow by acquiring real estate assets, which we intend to finance primarily through newly issued equity or debt. We may not be in a position to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities for growth if we are unable, due to global or regional economic uncertainty, changes in the state or federal regulatory environment relating to the medical-use cannabis industry, our own operating or financial performance or otherwise, to access capital markets on a timely basis and on favorable terms or at all. In addition, U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain and that it pay U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that it annually distributes less than 100% of its taxable income. Because we intend to grow our business, this limitation may require us to raise additional equity or incur debt at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so.

Our access to capital will depend upon a number of factors over which we have little or no control, including general market conditions and the market’s perception of our current and potential future earnings. If general economic instability or downturn leads to an inability to borrow at attractive rates or at all, our ability to obtain capital to finance the purchase of real estate assets could be negatively impacted. In addition, banks and other financial institutions may be reluctant to enter into lending transactions with us, particularly secured lending, because we intend to acquire properties used in the cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis. If this source of funding is unavailable to us, our growth may be limited and our levered return on the properties we purchase may be lower.

If we are unable to obtain capital on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, we likely will have to reduce the number of properties we can purchase. In addition, our ability to refinance all or any debt we may incur in the future, on acceptable terms or at all, is subject to all of the above factors, and will also be affected by our future financial position, results of operations and cash flows, which additional factors are also subject to significant uncertainties, and therefore we may be unable to refinance any debt we may incur in the future, as it matures, on acceptable terms or at all. All of these events would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

Any future indebtedness reduces cash available for distribution and may expose us to the risk of default under debt obligations that we may incur in the future.

Payments of principal and interest on borrowings that we may incur in the future may leave us with insufficient cash resources to operate the properties that we expect to acquire or to pay the distributions currently contemplated or necessary to satisfy the requirements for REIT qualification. Our level of debt and the limitations imposed on us by these debt agreements could have significant material and adverse consequences, including the following:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If any one of these events were to occur, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders could be materially and adversely affected.

Risks Related to Regulation

New laws that are adverse to the business of our tenants may be enacted, and current favorable state or local laws relating to cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis may be modified or eliminated in the future.

We are targeting for acquisition, properties that are owned by state-licensed cultivators and producers of medical-use cannabis. Relevant state or local laws may be amended or repealed, or new laws may be enacted in the future to eliminate existing laws permitting cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis. If our tenants involved in the cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis were forced to close their operations, we would need to replace those tenants with tenants who are not engaged in the cannabis industry, who may pay lower rents. Moreover, any changes in state or local laws that reduce or eliminate the ability to cultivate and produce medical-use cannabis would likely result in a high vacancy rate for the kinds of properties that we seek to acquire, which would depress our lease rates and property values. In addition, we would realize an economic loss on any and all improvements made to properties that were specific to the medical-use cannabis industry.

Our ability to grow our business depends on state laws pertaining to the cannabis industry.

Continued development of the medical-use cannabis industry depends upon continued legislative authorization of cannabis at the state level. The status quo of, or progress in, the regulated medical-use cannabis industry, while encouraging, is not assured and any number of factors could slow or halt further progress in this area. While there may be ample public support for legislative action permitting the manufacture and use of cannabis, numerous factors impact the legislative process. For example, in 2015, voters in Ohio rejected a ballot initiative that would have legalized medical and adult-use cannabis, but would have allowed commercial cultivation only at ten specifically designated parcels owned by certain private investors. Further legalization attempts at the state level that create bad public policy could slow or stop further development of the medical-use cannabis industry. In addition, several states, including Colorado, Washington and Oregon, have imposed significant taxes on the growth, processing and/or retail sales of cannabis, which may have the impact of dampening growth of the cannabis industry and making it difficult for cannabis businesses, including our tenants, to operate profitably in those states. Any one of these factors could slow or halt additional legislative authorization of medical-use cannabis, which could harm our business prospects.

Medical-use cannabis remains illegal under federal law, and therefore, strict enforcement of federal laws regarding medical-use cannabis would likely result in our inability and the inability of our tenants to execute our respective business plans.

Cannabis is a Schedule I controlled substance under the CSA. Even in those jurisdictions in which the manufacture and use of medical cannabis has been legalized at the state level, the possession, use and cultivation all remain violations of federal law that are punishable by imprisonment and substantial fines. Moreover, individuals and entities may violate federal law if they intentionally aid and abet another in violating these federal controlled substance laws, or conspire with another to violate them. The United States Supreme Court has ruled in United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers’ Coop. and Gonzales v. Raich that it is

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the federal government that has the right to regulate and criminalize cannabis, even for medical purposes. Therefore, were the federal government to strictly enforce federal law regarding cannabis, doing so would likely result in our inability to execute our business plan.

The U.S. Department of Justice, under the Obama administration, issued memoranda, including the so-called “Cole Memo” on August 29, 2013, characterizing enforcement of federal cannabis prohibitions under the CSA to prosecute those complying with state regulatory systems allowing the use, manufacture and distribution of medical cannabis as an inefficient use of federal investigative and prosecutorial resources when state regulatory and enforcement efforts are effective with respect to enumerated federal enforcement priorities under the CSA. In the “Cole Memo,” the U.S. Department of Justice provided guidance to all federal prosecutors indicating that federal enforcement of the CSA against cannabis-related conduct should be focused on eight priorities, which are to prevent: (1) distribution of cannabis to minors; (2) revenue from sale of cannabis to criminal enterprises, gangs and cartels; (3) transfer of cannabis from states where it is legal to states where it is illegal; (4) cannabis activity from being a pretext for trafficking of other illegal drugs or illegal activity; (5) violence or use of firearms in cannabis cultivation and distribution; (6) drugged driving and adverse public health consequences from cannabis use; (7) growth of cannabis on federal lands; and (8) cannabis possession or use on federal property.

In addition, Congress enacted an omnibus spending bill for fiscal year 2016 including a provision prohibiting the U.S. Department of Justice (which includes the DEA) from using funds appropriated by that bill to prevent states from implementing their medical-use cannabis laws. This provision, however, is effective only until December 9, 2016 and must be renewed by Congress in subsequent years. In order to extend the prohibition, it must be specifically included in the fiscal year 2017 Commerce, Justice, and Science (CJS) Appropriations bill — the germane bill. Currently, only the Senate version of the fiscal 2017 CJS Appropriations bill includes the prohibition and the House version does not. In USA vs. McIntosh , the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that this provision prohibits the U.S. Department of Justice from spending funds from relevant appropriations acts to prosecute individuals who engage in conduct permitted by state medical-use cannabis laws and who strictly comply with such laws. However, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion, which only applies to the states of Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, and Idaho, also held that persons who do not strictly comply with all state laws and regulations regarding the distribution, possession and cultivation of medical-use cannabis have engaged in conduct that is unauthorized, and in such instances the U.S. Department of Justice may prosecute those individuals.

Additionally, financial transactions involving proceeds generated by cannabis-related conduct can form the basis for prosecution under the federal money laundering statutes, unlicensed money transmitter statutes and the Bank Secrecy Act. However, supplemental guidance from the U.S. Department of Justice directs federal prosecutors to consider the federal enforcement priorities enumerated in the “Cole Memo” when determining whether to charge institutions or individuals with any of the financial crimes described above based upon cannabis-related activity.

Federal prosecutors have significant discretion and no assurance can be given that the federal prosecutor in each judicial district where we purchase a property will agree that the activities of our tenant on the property located in such prosecutor’s district do not involve those enumerated in the Cole Memo. There is also no guarantee that the current administration or future administrations will not revise the federal enforcement priorities enumerated in the Cole Memo or otherwise choose to strictly enforce the federal laws governing cannabis production or distribution. At this time, it is unknown whether the Trump administration will change the federal government’s current enforcement posture with respect to state-licensed medical-use cannabis. Any such change in the federal government’s current enforcement posture with respect to state-licensed cultivation of medical-use cannabis would result in our inability to execute our business plan and we would likely suffer significant losses with respect to our investment in medical-use cannabis facilities in the United States. Furthermore, if our tenants were to continue the cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis on properties that we own following any such change in the federal government’s enforcement position, we could be subject to criminal prosecution, which could lead to imprisonment and/or the imposition of penalties, fines, or forfeiture.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FDA regulation of medical-use cannabis and the possible registration of facilities where medical-use cannabis is grown could negatively affect the medical-use cannabis industry, which would directly affect our financial condition.

Should the federal government legalize cannabis for medical-use, it is possible that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, would seek to regulate it under the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act of 1938. Additionally, the FDA may issue rules and regulations including certified good manufacturing practices, or cGMPs, related to the growth, cultivation, harvesting and processing of medical cannabis. Clinical trials may be needed to verify efficacy and safety. It is also possible that the FDA would require that facilities where medical-use cannabis is grown register with the FDA and comply with certain federally prescribed regulations. In the event that some or all of these regulations are imposed, we do not know what the impact would be on the medical-use cannabis industry, including what costs, requirements and possible prohibitions may be enforced. If we or our tenants are unable to comply with the regulations or registration as prescribed by the FDA, we and or our tenants may be unable to continue to operate their and our business in its current form or at all.

We and our tenants may have difficulty accessing the service of banks, which may make it difficult to contract for real estate needs.

Financial transactions involving proceeds generated by cannabis-related conduct can form the basis for prosecution under the federal money laundering statutes, unlicensed money transmitter statute and the Bank Secrecy Act. Recent guidance issued by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCen, a division of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, clarifies how financial institutions can provide services to cannabis-related businesses consistent with their obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act. Furthermore, supplemental guidance from the U.S. Department of Justice directs federal prosecutors to consider the federal enforcement priorities enumerated in the “Cole Memo” when determining whether to charge institutions or individuals with any of the financial crimes described above based upon cannabis-related activity. Nevertheless, banks remain hesitant to offer banking services to cannabis-related businesses. Consequently, those businesses involved in the regulated medical-use cannabis industry continue to encounter difficulty establishing banking relationships. Our inability to maintain our current bank accounts would make it difficult for us to operate our business, increase our operating costs, and pose additional operational, logistical and security challenges and could result in our inability to implement our business plan.

The terms of our leases will require that our tenants make rental payments via check or wire transfer. The inability of our potential tenants to open accounts and continue using the services of banks may make it difficult for them to enter into triple-net lease arrangements with us or may result in their default under our lease agreements, either of which could materially harm our business.

Laws and regulations affecting the regulated cannabis industry are constantly changing, which could materially adversely affect our proposed operations, and we cannot predict the impact that future regulations may have on us.

Local, state and federal cannabis laws and regulations are broad in scope and subject to evolving interpretations, which could require us to incur substantial costs associated with compliance or alter our business plan. In addition, violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our operations. It is also possible that regulations may be enacted in the future that will be directly applicable to our proposed business. We cannot predict the nature of any future laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, nor can we determine what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative policies and procedures, when and if promulgated, could have on our business.

Applicable state laws may prevent us from maximizing our potential income.

Depending on the laws of each particular state, we may not be able to fully realize our potential to generate profit. Colorado and Washington have residency requirements for those directly involved in the medical-use cannabis industry, which may impede our ability to contract with cannabis businesses in those states. Furthermore, cities and counties are being given broad discretion to ban certain cannabis activities. Even if these activities are legal under state law, specific cities and counties may ban them.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Assets leased to cannabis businesses may be forfeited to the federal government.

Any assets used in conjunction with the violation of federal law are potentially subject to federal forfeiture, even in states where cannabis is legal. If the federal government decides to initiate forfeiture proceedings against cannabis businesses, such as the medical-use cannabis facilities that we intend to acquire, our investment in those properties may be lost.

The properties that we expect to acquire will be subject to extensive regulations, which may result in significant costs and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

The properties that we expect to acquire will be subject to various local laws and regulatory requirements. Local property regulations may restrict the use of properties we acquire and may require us to obtain approval from local authorities with respect to the properties that we expect to acquire, including prior to acquiring a property or when developing or undertaking renovations. Among other things, these restrictions may relate to cultivation of medical-use cannabis, the use of water and the discharge of waste water, fire and safety, seismic conditions, asbestos-cleanup or hazardous material abatement requirements. We cannot assure you that existing regulatory policies will not materially and adversely affect us or the timing or cost of any future acquisitions, developments or renovations, or that additional regulations will not be adopted that would increase such delays or result in additional costs. Our failure to obtain such regulatory approvals could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

Compliance with environmental laws could materially increase our operating expenses.

There may be environmental conditions associated with properties we acquire of which we are unaware. If environmental contamination exists on properties we acquire, we could become subject to liability for the contamination. The presence of hazardous substances on a property may materially and adversely affect our ability to sell the property and we may incur substantial remediation costs. In addition, although we may require in our leases that tenants operate in compliance with all applicable laws and indemnify us against any environmental liabilities arising from a tenant’s activities on the property, we could nonetheless be subject to liability by virtue of our ownership interest and we cannot be sure that our tenants would satisfy their indemnification obligations to us. Such environmental liability exposure associated with properties we acquire could harm our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure

We are dependent on our key personnel for our success.

We will depend upon the efforts, experience, diligence, skill and network of business contacts of our senior management team; therefore, our success will depend on their continued service. The departure of any of our executive officers or key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business. If any of our key personnel were to cease their employment, our operating results could suffer. Further, we do not intend to maintain key person life insurance that would provide us with proceeds in the event of death or disability of any of our key personnel.

We believe our future success depends upon our senior management team’s ability to hire and retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will be successful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel. If we lose or are unable to obtain the services of key personnel, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered, and the value of your investment may decline.

Furthermore, we may retain independent contractors to provide various services for us, including administrative services, transfer agent services and professional services. Such contractors have no fiduciary duty to us and may not perform as expected or desired.

Our senior management team will manage our portfolio subject to very broad investment guidelines and generally will not seek board approval for each investment decision.

Our senior management team has broad discretion over the use of proceeds from this offering, and you will have no opportunity to evaluate the terms of transactions or other economic or financial data concerning

TABLE OF CONTENTS

our investments that are not described in this prospectus or other periodic filings with the SEC. Furthermore, currently a substantial portion of the net proceeds of this offering is not committed to specific properties. We will rely on the senior management team’s ability to execute acquisitions and dispositions of medical-use cannabis facilities, subject to the oversight and approval of our board of directors. Our senior management team has not previously invested in medical-use cannabis facilities. Our senior management team will be authorized to execute acquisitions and dispositions of real estate investments in accordance with very broad investment guidelines. Our board of directors will periodically review our investment guidelines and our portfolio but will not, and will not be required to, review all of our proposed investments. Our senior management team will have great latitude within the broad parameters of our investment guidelines in determining the assets that are proper investments for us, which could result in investment returns that are substantially below expectations or that result in losses, which would materially and adversely affect our business operations and results. Accordingly, you should not purchase shares of our Class A common stock unless you are willing to entrust all aspects of our day-to-day management to our senior management team.

Certain provisions of Maryland law could inhibit changes in control.

Under the MGCL, “business combinations” (including a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or, in certain circumstances, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities) between a Maryland corporation and an “interested stockholder” or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. An interested stockholder is defined as: (a) any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the then-outstanding voting stock of the corporation; or (b) an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then-outstanding stock of the corporation.

A person is not an interested stockholder under the statute if the board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which the person otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. A Maryland corporation’s board of directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance with any terms and conditions determined by the board of directors prior to the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder.

Thereafter, any such business combination must generally be recommended by the board of directors of such corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:

A Maryland corporation’s board of directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance with any terms and conditions determined by it. These provisions of the MGCL do not apply, however, to business combinations that are approved or exempted by a Maryland corporation’s board of directors prior to the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder.

The “control share” provisions of the MGCL provide that, subject to certain exceptions, a holder of “control shares” of a Maryland corporation (defined as shares which, if aggregated with all other shares of stock owned by the acquirer or in respect of which the acquirer is able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), entitle the stockholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of issued and outstanding “control shares”) has no voting rights with respect to such shares except to the extent approved by our stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding votes entitled to be cast by the acquirer of control shares, our officers and our personnel who are also our directors. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the control share acquisition statute any and all acquisitions by any person

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of shares of our stock. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the control share acquisition statute any and all acquisitions by any person of shares of our stock. There can be no assurance that such provision will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future by our board of directors.

The “unsolicited takeover” provisions of Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the MGCL, or Subtitle 8, permit our board of directors, without stockholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in our charter or bylaws, to implement certain takeover defenses, some of which (for example, a classified board) we do not yet have. Our charter provides that, at such time as we are able to make a Subtitle 8 election (which we expect to be upon the completion of this offering), vacancies on our board may be filled only by the remaining directors and for the remainder of the full term of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred. Through provisions in our charter and bylaws unrelated to Subtitle 8, we already (i) require the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast not less than two-thirds of all of the votes entitled to be cast generally in the election of directors for the removal of any director from the board, only with cause, (ii) vest in the board of directors the exclusive power to fix the number of directorships and (iii) require, unless called by our chairman of the board, our chief executive officer or our board of directors, the written request of stockholders entitled to cast not less than a majority of all votes entitled to be cast at such a meeting to call a special meeting of our stockholders.

These provisions may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us under the circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of shares of Class A common stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then current market price. See the sections entitled “Certain Provisions of Maryland Law and Our Charter and Bylaws — Business Combinations,” “— Control Share Acquisitions” and “— Subtitle 8.”

Our board of directors may change our investment objectives and strategies without stockholder consent.

Our board of directors determines our major policies, including with regard to financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our board of directors may amend or revise these and other policies without a vote of the stockholders. Under our charter and the MGCL, our stockholders generally have a right to vote only on the following matters:

All other matters are subject to the discretion of our board of directors.

Our authorized but unissued shares of common and preferred stock may prevent a change in our control.

Our charter permits our board of directors to authorize us to issue additional shares of our authorized but unissued common or preferred stock. In addition, our board of directors may, without stockholder approval, amend our charter to increase the aggregate number of our shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have the authority to issue and classify or reclassify any unissued shares of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

common or preferred stock and set the terms of the classified or reclassified shares. As a result, our board of directors may establish a class or series of shares of common or preferred stock that could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for shares of our Class A common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.

Because of our holding company structure, we depend on our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries for cash flow and we will be structurally subordinated in right of payment to the obligations of such operating subsidiary and its subsidiaries.

We are a holding company with no business operations of our own. Our only significant asset is and will be the general and limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership. We conduct, and intend to conduct, all of our business operations through our Operating Partnership. Accordingly, our only source of cash to pay our obligations is distributions from our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries of their net earnings and cash flows. We cannot assure you that our Operating Partnership or its subsidiaries will be able to, or be permitted to, make distributions to us that will enable us to make distributions to our stockholders from cash flows from operations. Each of our Operating Partnership’s subsidiaries is or will be a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, legal and contractual restrictions may limit our ability to obtain cash from such entities. In addition, because we are a holding company, your claims as stockholders will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities and obligations of our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. Therefore, in the event of our bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization, our assets and those of our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries will be able to satisfy your claims as stockholders only after all of our and our Operating Partnership’s and its subsidiaries’ liabilities and obligations have been paid in full.

Our Operating Partnership may issue additional limited partnership interests to third parties without the consent of our stockholders, which would reduce our ownership percentage in our Operating Partnership and would have a dilutive effect on the amount of distributions made to us by our Operating Partnership and, therefore, the amount of distributions we can make to our stockholders.

We are the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership and, upon consummation of this offering, will own, directly or through a subsidiary, 100% of the outstanding partnership interests in our Operating Partnership. We may, in connection with our acquisition of properties or otherwise, cause our Operating Partnership to issue additional limited partnership interests to third parties. Such issuances would reduce our ownership percentage in our Operating Partnership and affect the amount of distributions made to us by our Operating Partnership and, therefore, the amount of distributions we can make to our stockholders. Because you will not directly own any interest in our Operating Partnership, you will not have any voting rights with respect to any such issuances or other partnership level activities of our Operating Partnership.

If we issue limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership in exchange for property, the value placed on such partnership interests may not accurately reflect their market value, which may dilute your interest in us.

If we issue limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership in exchange for property, the per unit value attributable to such interests will be determined based on negotiations with the property seller and, therefore, may not reflect the fair market value of such limited partnership interests if a public market for such limited partnership interests existed. If the value of such limited partnership interests is greater than the value of the related property, your interest in us may be diluted.

Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited, which could limit your recourse in the event of actions not in your best interests.

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive directors and officers, that provide for idemnification to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. Maryland law permits us to include in our charter a provision eliminating the liability of our directors and officers and our stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our charter authorizes us to obligate ourselves and our bylaws obligate us, to the fullest extent permitted by Maryland law in effect from time to time, to indemnify and, without requiring a preliminary determination of the ultimate entitlement to indemnification, pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding to:

See the section entitled “Certain Provisions of Maryland Law and Our Charter and Bylaws — Indemnification and Limitation of Directors’ and Officers’ Liability.”

Our charter contains provisions that make removal of our directors difficult, which could make it difficult for our stockholders to effect changes to our management.

Our charter provides that, subject to the rights of holders of any series of preferred stock, a director may be removed only with cause upon the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast generally in the election of directors. Vacancies may be filled only by a majority of the remaining directors in office, even if less than a quorum. These requirements make it more difficult to change our management by removing and replacing directors and may prevent a change in control of our company that is in the best interests of our stockholders.

Ownership limitations may restrict change in control or business combination opportunities in which our stockholders might receive a premium for their shares.

In order for us to qualify as a REIT under the Code, shares of our stock must be owned by 100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months (other than the first year for which an election to be a REIT has been made) or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Also, not more than 50% of the value of the outstanding shares of our stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities) during the last half of a taxable year (other than the first year for which an election to be a REIT has been made). In order for us to qualify as a REIT under the Code, the relevant sections of our charter provide that, after completion of this offering and subject to certain exceptions, no person or entity may own, or be deemed to own, by virtue of the applicable constructive ownership provisions of the Code, more than 9.8% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the aggregate of our outstanding shares of stock or more than 9.8% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding common stock or any class or series of our outstanding preferred stock. These ownership limits and other restrictions could have the effect of discouraging a takeover or other transaction in which holders of our Class A common stock might receive a premium for their shares over the then prevailing market price or which holders might believe to be otherwise in their best interests.

A material weakness has been identified in our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, our ability to accurately and timely report our financial results could be impaired, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, the trading price of our shares of common stock could decline and our access to the capital markets or other financing sources could become limited.

In preparing and reviewing our consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2016 and for the period from June 15, 2016 (date of incorporation) through September 30, 2016, and in connection with our restatement of our previously issued audited balance sheet as of September 30, 2016, we and our independent

TABLE OF CONTENTS

registered public accounting firm identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weakness identified related to our failure to obtain an independent valuation in connection with our accounting for our restricted stock grants of Class B common stock to founders, and lack of recognition of the related stock compensation during the period. As a result, a restatement was required for our consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2016 and for the period then ended.

In addition, neither we nor our independent registered public accounting firm has performed an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting during any period in accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In light of the material weakness that was identified as a result of the limited procedures performed, we believe that it is possible that, had we and our independent registered public accounting firm performed an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, additional material weaknesses or significant control deficiencies may have been identified.

If we fail to remediate the material weakness or to meet the demands that will be placed upon us as a public company, including the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we may be unable to accurately report our financial results, or report them within the timeframes required by law or stock exchange regulations. Failure to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could also potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities. We cannot assure you that we will be able to remediate the material weakness in a timely manner, or at all, or that in the future, additional material weaknesses will not exist or otherwise be discovered. If we fail to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, our ability to accurately and timely report our financial results could be impaired, which could result in late filings of our annual and quarterly reports under the Exchange Act, restatements of our consolidated financial statements or suspension or delisting of our common stock from the NYSE, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, the trading price of our shares of common stock could decline and our access to the capital markets or other financing sources could become limited.

We will be subject to financial reporting and other requirements for which our accounting and other management systems and resources may not be adequately prepared.

Following this offering, we will be subject to reporting and other obligations under the Exchange Act, including the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Section 404 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and, after we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” our independent registered public accounting firm to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. To the extent applicable, these reporting and other obligations will place significant demands on our management, administrative, operational, and accounting resources and will cause us to incur significant expenses. We will need to create systems; implement financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures; and hire additional accounting and finance staff. If we are unable to accomplish these objectives in a timely and effective manner, our ability to comply with the financial reporting requirements and other rules that apply to public reporting companies could be impaired. Any failure to maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pursuant to the recently enacted JOBS Act, we are eligible to take advantage of certain specified reduced disclosure and other requirements that are otherwise generally applicable to public companies for so long as we are an “emerging growth company.”

We qualify as an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. An “emerging growth company” may take advantage of specified reduced reporting requirements and is relieved of certain other significant requirements that are otherwise generally applicable to public companies. While we are an “emerging growth company,” among other things:

We have elected to use an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards, and this election is irrevocable. We have not made a decision whether to take advantage of other exemptions. If we do take advantage of additional exemptions, some investors may find our Class A common stock less attractive, which may result in a less active trading market for our Class A common stock and a more volatile stock price.

We plan to operate our business so that we are not required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

We intend to engage primarily in the business of investing in real estate and we do not intend to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. If our primary business were to change in a manner that would require us register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we would have to comply with substantial regulation under the Investment Company Act which could restrict the manner in which we operate and finance our business and could materially and adversely affect our business operations and results.

Risks Related to Our Class A Common Stock

We set the initial public offering price of our shares of Class A common stock arbitrarily and such price may not accurately reflect the value of our assets or our expected operating income.

We established the initial offering price of our shares of Class A common stock on an arbitrary basis. This price bears no relationship to our book or asset values or to any other established criteria for valuing shares. Because the initial offering price is not based upon any valuation (independent or otherwise), the trading price of our shares of Class A common stock following the completion of this offering could be lower or higher than the initial public offering price.

There is no public market for our Class A common stock and a market may never develop which could cause our Class A common stock to trade at a discount and make it difficult for holders of our Class A common stock to sell their shares.

Shares of our Class A common stock are newly-issued securities for which there is no established trading market. We have been approved to list our Class A common stock on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance. However, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for our Class A common stock will develop, or if one develops, be maintained. Accordingly, no assurance can be given as to the ability of our stockholders to sell their Class A common stock or the price that our stockholders may obtain for their Class A common stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Some of the factors that could negatively affect the market price of our Class A common stock include:

Market factors unrelated to our performance could also negatively impact the market price of our Class A common stock. One of the factors that investors may consider in deciding whether to buy or sell our Class A common stock is our distribution rate as a percentage of our stock price relative to market interest rates. If market interest rates increase, prospective investors may demand a higher distribution rate or seek alternative investments paying higher dividends or interest. As a result, interest rate fluctuations and conditions in capital markets can affect the market value of our Class A common stock.

Common stock and preferred stock eligible for future sale may have material and adverse effects on our share price.

Subject to applicable law, our board of directors, without stockholder approval, may authorize us to issue additional authorized and unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock on the terms and for the consideration it deems appropriate. In addition, upon completion of this offering, our executive officers and directors will own approximately 3.5% of our total outstanding shares of Class A common stock, including (i) 150,000 shares of Class A common stock that our executive chairman may purchase in this offering at the public offering price and (ii) grants of an aggregate of 27,500 shares of Class A common stock to two of our executive officers under the Incentive Plan that are expected to be approved at the first meeting of the compensation committee of our board of directors after completion of this offering.

Upon completion of this offering and following grants of shares of our Class A common stock expected to be made to two of our executive officers, there will be 972,500 shares of Class A common stock available for future issuance and sale under the Incentive Plan. In connection with stock splits, dividends, recapitalizations and certain other events, our board will make equitable adjustments that it deems appropriate in the aggregate number of shares of our Class A common stock that may be issued under the Incentive Plan and the terms of outstanding awards. The sale of awards under the Incentive Plan will dilute the ownership interests of our existing stockholders and may depress the trading price of our Class A common stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We cannot predict the effect, if any, of future sales of our common stock or the availability of shares for future sales, on the market price of our Class A common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of common stock or the perception that such sales could occur may materially and adversely affect the prevailing market price for our common stock.

We cannot assure you of our ability to make distributions in the future. We may be unable to pay or maintain cash dividends, and may borrow money, sell assets or use offering proceeds to make distributions to our stockholders, if we are unable to make distributions from cash flows from operations.

U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain (which does not equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP), and that it pay U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that it annually distributes less than 100% of its taxable income. We intend to make quarterly distributions of all or substantially all of our taxable income so as to satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT and generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. However, we cannot assure you that distributions will be made or sustained. Any distributions we make will be at the direction of our board of directors and will depend upon a number of factors, including our actual results of operations, economic conditions and other factors that could differ materially from our current expectations. In addition, we may borrow money, sell assets or use offering proceeds to make distributions to our stockholders, if we are unable to make distributions from cash flows from operations. See the section entitled “Distribution Policy.”

Our charter permits us to pay distributions from any source and, as a result, the amount of distributions paid at any time may not reflect the performance of our properties or as cash flow from operations.

Our organizational documents permit us to make distributions from any source. To the extent that our cash available for distribution is insufficient to cover our distributions, we expect to use the proceeds from this offering, the proceeds from the issuance of securities in the future, the proceeds from borrowings or other sources to pay distributions. It is possible that in our initial years of operation, any distributions declared will be paid from our offering proceeds, which would constitute a return of capital to our stockholders. If we fund distributions from borrowings, sales of properties or the net proceeds from this offering, we will have fewer funds available for the acquisition of additional properties resulting in potentially fewer investments, less diversification of our portfolio and a reduced overall return to our stockholders. In addition, the value of our shares of Class A common stock may be diluted because funds that would otherwise be available to make investments would be diverted to fund distributions.

The market price of our Class A common stock could be materially and adversely affected by our level of cash distributions.

The market value of the equity securities of a REIT is based primarily upon the market’s perception of our growth potential and its current and potential future cash distributions, whether from operations, sales or re-financings, and is secondarily based upon the real estate market value of the underlying assets. For that reason, our Class A common stock may trade at prices that are higher or lower than our net asset value per share. To the extent we retain operating cash flow for investment purposes, working capital reserves or other purposes, these retained funds, while increasing the value of our underlying assets, may not correspondingly increase the market price of our Class A common stock. Our failure to meet the market’s expectations with regard to future earnings and cash distributions likely would materially and adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock.

Future offerings of debt or preferred equity securities, which may rank senior to our Class A common stock, may materially and adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock.

If we decide to issue debt securities in the future, which would rank senior to our Class A common stock, it is likely that they will be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting our operating flexibility. Additionally, any preferred equity securities or convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of our Class A common stock and may result in dilution to owners of our Class A common stock. We and, indirectly, our

TABLE OF CONTENTS

stockholders will bear the cost of issuing and servicing such securities. Because our decision to issue debt or preferred equity securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, holders of our Class A common stock will bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our Class A common stock and diluting the value of their stock holdings in us.

Investors participating in this offering will incur immediate and substantial dilution.

If you purchase shares of Class A common stock in this offering, you will incur immediate and substantial dilution in the amount of $1.92 per share, because the assumed initial public offering price of $20.00 is substantially higher than the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our outstanding common stock after the consummation of this offering. For additional information, see the section entitled “Dilution.”

Your percentage of ownership may become diluted if we issue new shares of stock or other securities, and issuances of preferred stock or other securities by us may subordinate the rights of the holders of our Class A common stock.

Our board of directors is authorized, without your approval, to cause us to issue additional shares of our common stock or to raise capital through the issuance of preferred stock (including equity or debt securities convertible into preferred stock), options, warrants and other rights, on terms and for consideration as our board of directors in its sole discretion may determine. Any such issuance could result in dilution of the equity of our stockholders.

Our charter also authorizes our board of directors, without stockholder approval, to designate and issue one or more classes or series of preferred stock (including equity or debt securities convertible into preferred stock) and to set or change the voting, conversion or other rights, preferences, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions and qualifications or terms or conditions of redemption of each class of shares so issued. If any preferred stock is publicly offered, the terms and conditions of such preferred stock (including any equity or debt securities convertible into preferred stock) will be set forth in a registration statement registering the issuance of such preferred stock or equity or debt securities convertible into preferred stock. Because our board of directors has the power to establish the preferences and rights of each class or series of preferred stock, it may afford the holders of any series or class of preferred stock preferences, powers, and rights senior to the rights of holders of common stock or other preferred stock. If we ever create and issue additional preferred stock or equity or debt securities convertible into preferred stock with a distribution preference over common stock or preferred stock, payment of any distribution preferences of new outstanding preferred stock would reduce the amount of funds available for the payment of distributions on the common stock and junior preferred stock. Further, holders of preferred stock are normally entitled to receive a preference payment if we liquidate, dissolve, or wind up before any payment is made to the common stockholders, likely reducing the amount common stockholders would otherwise receive upon such an occurrence. In addition, under certain circumstances, the issuance of additional preferred stock may delay, prevent, render more difficult or tend to discourage a merger, tender offer, or proxy contest, the assumption of control by a holder of a large block of our securities, or the removal of incumbent management.

Risks Related to Our Taxation as a REIT

Our failure to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT would subject us to U.S. federal income tax and applicable state and local taxes, which would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders and have significant adverse consequences on the market price of our Class A common stock.

We have been organized and we intend to operate in a manner that will enable us to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2016 or, if later, the first year in which we have material real estate assets and operations. We have not requested and do not intend to request a ruling from the Service that we qualify as a REIT, and the statements in this prospectus are not binding on the Service or any court. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions and regulations promulgated by the U.S. Treasury Department, or the Treasury Regulations, thereunder for which there are limited judicial and administrative interpretations. Accordingly, we cannot provide assurance that we will qualify or remain qualified as a REIT.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

To qualify as a REIT, we must meet, on an ongoing basis, various tests regarding the nature and diversification of our assets and our income, the ownership of our outstanding stock, and the amount of our distributions to stockholders. Our ability to satisfy these asset tests depends upon the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals. Our compliance with the REIT income and quarterly asset requirements also depends upon our ability to manage successfully the composition of our income and assets on an ongoing basis. Moreover, new legislation, court decisions or administrative guidance, in each case possibly with retroactive effect, may make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT. Thus, while we intend to operate in a manner to qualify as a REIT, in view of the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations, and the possibility of future changes in our circumstances, we cannot provide assurance that we will so qualify for any particular year. These considerations also might restrict the types of income we can realize, or assets that we can acquire in the future.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and we do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, we would be required to pay U.S. federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We will not be able to deduct distributions to our stockholders in any year in which we fail to qualify, nor will we be required to make distributions to our stockholders. In such a case, we might need to borrow money, sell assets, or reduce or even cease making distributions in order to pay our taxes. Our payment of income tax would reduce significantly the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT, all distributions to stockholders, to the extent of current and accumulated earnings and profits, will be taxable to the stockholders as dividend income (which may be subject to tax at preferential rates) and corporate distributes may be eligible for the dividends received deduction if they satisfy the relevant provisions of the Code. Furthermore, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, we no longer would be required to distribute substantially all of our net taxable income to our stockholders. In addition, unless we were eligible for certain statutory relief provisions, we could not re-elect to qualify as a REIT until the fifth calendar year following the year in which we failed to qualify. We might not be entitled to the statutory relief described in this paragraph in all circumstances.

The REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan, require us to borrow funds during unfavorable market conditions or subject us to tax, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to our stockholders, on an annual basis, at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain. In addition, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our net taxable income (including net capital gain) and will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount by which our distributions in any calendar year are less than a minimum amount specified under U.S. federal income tax laws. We intend to distribute our net income to our stockholders in a manner intended to satisfy the REIT 90% distribution requirement and to avoid U.S. federal income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax. However, we can provide no assurances that we will have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet these requirements. Difficulties in meeting the distribution requirements might arise due to competing demands for available funds or timing differences between tax reporting and cash receipts. In addition, if the Service were to disallow certain of our deductions, such as employee salaries, depreciation or interest expense, by alleging that we, through our rental agreements with our state-licensed medical cannabis tenants, are primarily or vicariously liable for “trafficking” a Schedule 1 substance (cannabis) under Section 280E of the Code or otherwise, we would be unable to meet the distribution requirements and would fail to qualify as a REIT. Likewise, if any governmental entity were to impose fines on us for our business involvement in state-licensed medical-use cannabis, such fines would not be deductible and the inability to deduct such fines could also cause us to be unable to satisfy the distribution requirement.

We may also generate less cash flow than taxable income in a particular year. In such event, we may be required to use cash reserves, incur debt or liquidate assets at rates or times that we regard as unfavorable or, to the extent possible, make a taxable distribution of our stock in order to satisfy the REIT 90% distribution requirement and to avoid U.S. federal income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax in that year. Under

TABLE OF CONTENTS

certain circumstances, we may be able to rectify a failure to meet the distribution requirement for a year by paying “deficiency dividends” to stockholders in a later year, which may be included in our deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year. Thus, we may be able to avoid being taxed on amounts distributed as deficiency dividends; however, we will be required to pay penalties and interest based upon the amount of any deduction taken for deficiency dividends. If we do not have sufficient cash to distribute, we may incur U.S. federal income tax, U.S. federal excise tax and/or our REIT status may be jeopardized.

If we are deemed to be subject to Section 280E of the Code because of the business activities of our tenants, the resulting disallowance of tax deductions could cause us to incur U.S. federal income tax and jeopardize our REIT status.

Section 280E of the Code provides that, with respect to any taxpayer, no deduction or credit is allowed for expenses incurred during a taxable year “in carrying on any trade or business if such trade or business (or the activities which comprise such trade or business) consists of trafficking in controlled substances (within the meaning of Schedule I and II of the CSA) which is prohibited by federal law or the law of any State in which such trade or business is conducted.” Because cannabis is a Schedule I controlled substance under the CSA, Section 280E by its terms applies to the purchase and sale of medical-use cannabis products. Although we will not be engaged in the purchase, sale, growth, cultivation, harvesting, or processing of medical-use cannabis products, we will lease our properties to tenants who will engage in such activities, and therefore our tenants will likely be subject to Section 280E. If the Service were to take the position that, through our rental agreements with our state-licensed medical-use cannabis tenants, we are primarily or vicariously liable under federal law for “trafficking” a Schedule 1 substance (cannabis) under section 280E of the Code or for any other violations of the CSA, the Service may seek to apply the provisions of Section 280E to our company and disallow certain tax deductions, including for employee salaries, depreciation or interest expense. If such tax deductions are disallowed, we would be unable to meet the distribution requirements applicable to REITs under the Code, which could cause us to incur U.S. federal income tax and fail to qualify as a REIT. Because we will not be engaged in the purchase and/or sale of a controlled substance, we do not believe that we will be subject to the disallowance provisions of Section 280E, and neither we nor our tax advisors are aware of any tax court cases or guidance from the Service in which a taxpayer not engaged in the purchase or sale of a controlled substance was disallowed deductions under Section 280E. However, there is no assurance that the Service will not take such a position either currently or in the future.

Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive business opportunities or liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

To qualify as a REIT, we must ensure that we meet the REIT gross income tests annually. In addition, we must ensure that, at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our total assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets, including certain mortgage loans, certain kinds of mortgage-backed securities and certain securities issued by other REITs. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities, securities of corporations that are treated as TRSs, and qualified REIT real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, no more than 25% (20% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017) of the value of our total securities can be represented by securities of one or more TRSs, and, the aggregate value of debt instruments issued by public REITs held by us that are not otherwise secured by real property may not exceed 25% of the value of our total assets. See the section entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations — Asset Tests.” If we fail to comply with these asset requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we generally must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences.

To meet these tests, we may be required to take or forgo taking actions that we would otherwise consider advantageous. For instance, in order to satisfy the gross income or asset tests applicable to REITs under the Code, we may be required to forego investments that we otherwise would make. Furthermore, we may be required to liquidate from our portfolio otherwise attractive investments. In addition, we may be required to

TABLE OF CONTENTS

make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our investment performance.

The tax on prohibited transactions could limit our ability to engage in certain transactions or subject us to a 100% penalty tax.

We will be subject to a 100% tax on any income from a prohibited transaction. “Prohibited transactions” generally include sales or other dispositions of property (other than property treated as foreclosure property under the Code) that is held as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business by a REIT, either directly or indirectly through certain pass-through subsidiaries. Although we do not intend to hold a significant amount of assets as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our business, the characterization of an asset sale as a prohibited transaction depends on the particular facts and circumstances. The Code provides a safe harbor that, if met, allows a REIT to avoid being treated as engaged in a prohibited transaction. It is likely that we may sell certain properties that have not met all of the requirements of such safe harbor if we believe the transaction would not be a prohibited transaction based on a facts and circumstances analysis. If the Service were to successfully argue that such a sale was in fact a prohibited transaction, we would be subject to a 100% penalty tax with respect to such sale.

If we were considered to actually or constructively pay a “preferential dividend” to certain of our stockholders, our status as a REIT could be adversely affected.

In order to qualify as a REIT, we must annually distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income, as calculated in accordance with GAAP), determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain. In order for distributions to be counted as satisfying the annual distribution requirements for REITs, and to provide us with a REIT-level tax deduction, the distributions must not be “preferential dividends.” A dividend is not a preferential dividend if the distribution is pro rata among all outstanding shares of stock within a particular class, and in accordance with the preferences among different classes of stock as set forth in our organizational documents. Currently, there is uncertainty as to the Service’s position regarding whether certain arrangements that REITs have with their stockholders could give rise to the inadvertent payment of a preferential dividend (e.g., the pricing methodology for stock purchased under a distribution reinvestment program inadvertently causing a greater than 5% discount on the price of such stock purchased). There is no de minimis exception with respect to preferential dividends; therefore, if the Service were to take the position that we inadvertently paid a preferential dividend, we may be deemed to have failed the 90% distribution test, and our status as a REIT could be terminated for the year in which such determination is made if we were unable to cure such failure. While we believe that our operations will be structured in such a manner that we will not be treated as inadvertently paying preferential dividends, we can provide no assurance to this effect.

The “preferential dividend” prohibition described above does not apply to a “publicly offered REIT,” which generally is a REIT that is required to make regular filings with the SEC under the Exchange Act. While we intend to qualify as a “publicly offered REIT” and therefore expect that the preferential dividend prohibition will not apply to us, we cannot provide you with assurance that we will so qualify and, accordingly, we may be subject to the prohibition.

The ability of our board of directors to revoke our REIT election without stockholder approval may cause adverse consequences to our stockholders.

Our charter provides that the board of directors may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if the board of directors determines that it is no longer in our best interest to attempt to, or continue to, qualify as a REIT. If we cease to qualify as a REIT, we would become subject to U.S. federal income tax on our net taxable income and we generally would no longer be required to distribute any of our net taxable income to our stockholders, which may have adverse consequences on our total return to our stockholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates on dividend income from regular corporations, which could adversely affect the value of our Class A common stock.

The maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for certain qualified dividends payable to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates is 20%. Dividends (other than capital gain dividends) payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rates and therefore may be subject to a 39.6% maximum U.S. federal income tax rate on ordinary income when paid to such stockholders. Although the reduced U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to dividend income from regular corporate dividends does not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends paid by REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of our Class A common stock.

Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge our liabilities effectively and may cause us to incur tax liabilities.

The REIT provisions of the Code may limit our ability to hedge our liabilities. Any income from a hedging transaction we enter into to manage risk of interest rate changes, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets, if properly identified under applicable Treasury Regulations, does not constitute “gross income” for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions will likely be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both of the gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may need to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because our TRSs would be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses in a TRS generally will not provide any tax benefit, except for being carried forward against future taxable income of such TRS.

Non-U.S. stockholders will generally be subject to withholding tax with respect to our ordinary dividends.

Non-U.S. stockholders (as defined in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations”) generally will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax on ordinary dividends received from us at a 30% rate, subject to reduction under an applicable treaty or a statutory exemption under the Code.

Legislative or regulatory tax changes related to REITs could materially and adversely affect our business.

At any time, the U.S. federal income tax laws or Treasury Regulations governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws or regulations may be changed, possibly with retroactive effect. We cannot predict if or when any new U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, will be adopted, promulgated or become effective or whether any such law, regulation or interpretation may take effect retroactively. We and our stockholders could be adversely affected by any such change in, or any new, U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation. You also should note that our counsel’s tax opinion is based upon existing law, applicable as of the date of its opinion, all of which will be subject to change, either prospectively or retroactively.

Your investment has various tax risks.

Although provisions of the Code generally relevant to an investment in shares of our Class A common stock are described in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations,” you should consult your tax advisor concerning the effects of U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax laws to you with regard to an investment in our Class A common stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Retirement Plan Risks

If the fiduciary of an employee benefit plan subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or ERISA (such as a profit sharing, Section 401(k) or pension plan), or an owner of a retirement arrangement subject to Section 4975 of the Code (such as an Individual Retirement Account, or IRA) fails to meet the fiduciary and other standards under ERISA or the Code as a result of an investment in our shares of Class A common stock, the fiduciary could be subject to penalties and other sanctions.

There are special considerations that apply to employee benefit plans subject to ERISA (such as profit sharing, Section 401(k) or pension plans) and other retirement plans or accounts subject to Section 4975 of the Code (such as an IRA) that are investing in our shares of Class A common stock. Fiduciaries and IRA owners investing the assets of such a plan or account in our Class A common stock should satisfy themselves that:

Failure to satisfy the fiduciary standards of conduct and other applicable requirements of ERISA, the Code or other applicable statutory or common law may result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties and could subject the fiduciary to claims for damages or for equitable remedies, including liability for investment losses. In addition, if an investment in our shares constitutes a non-exempt prohibited transaction under ERISA or the Code, the fiduciary or IRA owner who authorized or directed the investment may be subject to the imposition of excise taxes with respect to the amount invested. In addition, the investment transaction must be undone. In the case of a non-exempt prohibited transaction involving an IRA owner, the IRA may be disqualified as a tax-exempt account and all of the assets of the IRA may be deemed distributed and subjected to tax. ERISA plan fiduciaries and IRA owners should consult with their legal, tax, financial and other advisors before making an investment in our Class A common stock. The sale of shares of our Class A common stock to a plan is in no respect a representation by us or any other person associated with the offering of our common stock that such an investment meets all relevant legal requirements with respect to investments by plans generally or any particular plan, or that such an investment is appropriate for plans generally or any particular plan.

For a further discussion of the issues and risks associated with an investment in our Class A common stock by employee benefit plans, IRAs and other benefit plan investors, see the section entitled “ERISA Considerations.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future performance, taking into account all information currently available to us. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us. Some of these factors are described in this prospectus under the sections entitled “Prospectus Summary,” “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and “Business.” If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made. New risks and uncertainties arise over time, and it is not possible for us to predict those events or how they may affect us. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to, and do not intend to, update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Market data and industry forecasts and projections used in this prospectus have been obtained from independent industry sources. Forecasts, projections and other forward-looking information obtained from such sources are subject to similar qualifications and uncertainties as other forward-looking statements in this prospectus.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DISTRIBUTION POLICY

We intend to elect and qualify to be treated as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2016 or, if later, the first year in which we have material real estate assets and operations. U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain (which does not equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP), and that it pay U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that it annually distributes less than 100% of its taxable income.

We are a newly formed company that has not commenced operations and, as a result, we have not paid distributions as of the date of this prospectus. To satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT and generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, we intend to make quarterly distributions of all or substantially all of our taxable income to holders of our common stock out of assets legally available therefor. However, we cannot assure you that distributions will be made or sustained. Any distributions we make will be at the direction of our board of directors and will depend upon a number of factors, including our actual results of operations, economic conditions, maintenance of REIT qualification and the applicable provisions of the MGCL and such other factors as our board may determine in its sole discretion.

Our organizational documents permit us to make distributions from any source. If our cash available for distribution is insufficient to cover our distributions, we expect to use the proceeds from this offering, the proceeds from the issuance of securities in the future, the proceeds from borrowings or other sources to pay distributions. During our initial years of operation, we expect that a portion of our distributions declared may be paid from offering proceeds, which would constitute a return of capital to our stockholders.

We anticipate that our distributions generally will be taxable as ordinary income to our stockholders, although a portion of the distributions may be designated by us as qualified dividend income or capital gain or may constitute a return of capital. We will furnish annually to each of our stockholders a statement setting forth distributions paid during the preceding year and their characterization as ordinary income, return of capital, qualified dividend income or capital gain. For more information, see the section entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations — Taxation of U.S. Holders — Taxation of Taxable U.S. Holders on Distributions on Shares.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth (i) our actual capitalization as of September 30, 2016, and (ii) our pro forma capitalization, as adjusted to give effect to the sale of the 5,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock in this offering, at an assumed initial public offering price of $20.00 per share, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated organization, offering and other expenses payable by us.

You should read this table together with “Use of Proceeds,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.

		September 30, 2016
		Actual				As Adjusted (1) (2)
Stockholders’ equity:
Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 49,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued and outstanding on an actual basis, and 5,000,000 shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted		$	—			$	5,000
Class B common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 1,000,000 shares authorized and 508,065 shares issued and outstanding on an actual basis, and no shares issued and outstanding as adjusted			508				—
Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued and outstanding			—				—
Additional paid-in capital			200,000				95,145,000
Accumulated deficit			(200,000	)			(4,250,000	)
Total stockholders’ equity		$	508			$	90,900,000

(1)

Excludes (i) up to 750,000 shares of our Class A common stock that may be issued by us upon exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option and (ii) an aggregate of 27,500 shares of Class A common stock that are expected to be issued to two executive officers under the Incentive Plan upon approval at the first meeting of the compensation committee of our board of directors after completion of this offering.

(2)

The 508,065 shares of Class B common stock issued to our founders, including certain executive officers and directors, will be redeemed by us for $0.001 per share and cancelled immediately before the closing of this offering. See the sections entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Description of Securities.” The as adjusted amounts do not include 1,000,000 shares of Class A common stock reserved for future issuance under the Incentive Plan.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DILUTION

Investors participating in this offering will incur immediate and substantial dilution. If you invest in shares of our Class A common stock in this offering, your interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial public offering price per share of our Class A common stock and the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our Class A common stock upon completion of this offering, taking into account the issuance of shares of Class A common stock under the Incentive Plan at the first meeting of our compensation committee of our board of directors after completion of this offering.

After giving effect to our sale of 5,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock in this offering, at an assumed initial public offering price of $20.00 per share and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commission and estimated organizational, offering and other expenses payable by us, our pro forma net tangible book value as of September 30, 2016 would have been approximately $90.9 million, or $18.08 per share of our Class A common stock. This represents an immediate decrease in pro forma net tangible book value of $1.92 per share to new investors purchasing shares in this offering. See the section entitled “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Class A Common Stock — Investors in this offering will incur immediate and substantial dilution.”

The following table illustrates this dilution:

Assumed initial public offering price per share		$	20.00
Pro forma net tangible book value per share after the offering, before the issuance of shares under the Incentive Plan (1)		$	18.18
Decrease in pro forma net tangible book value per share to existing stockholders attributable to the issuance of shares under the Incentive Plan (2)		$	(0.10	)
Pro forma net tangible book value per share after this offering (3)		$	18.08
Dilution per share to new investors (4)		$	1.92

(1)

After deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and organizational, offering and other costs.

(2)

Includes the issuance of an aggregate of 27,500 shares of Class A common stock that are expected to be issued to two of our executive officers under the Incentive Plan upon approval at the first meeting our of compensation committee of our board of directors after completion of this offering.

(3)

Based on pro forma net tangible book value attributable to common stockholders of approximately $90.9 million divided by the sum of (i) 5,000,000 shares of our common shares to be issued in this offering, and (ii) 27,500 shares expected to be issued under the Incentive Plan.

(4)

Dilution is determined by subtracting pro forma net tangible book value per share of our Class A common stock after giving effect to this offering from the initial public offering price paid by a new investor for a shares of Class A common stock.

The information discussed above is illustrative only and will change based on the actual initial public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing. The number of shares of our Class A common stock to be outstanding after this offering for purposes of this dilution calculation is based on a total of 5,027,500 shares of our Class A common stock, consisting of 5,000,000 shares of Class A common stock sold in this offering and 27,500 shares of Class A common stock expected to be issued under the Incentive Plan at the first meeting of our compensation committee of our board of directors after completion of this offering, and excludes 972,500 additional shares of our Class A common stock reserved for future issuance under the Incentive Plan. There will be further dilution to new investors with respect to the shares issued pursuant to stock awards issued under the Incentive Plan.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following table sets forth selected historical and pro forma financial information that has been derived from our historical audited consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2016 and for the period from June 15, 2016 (date of incorporation) through September 30, 2016. Except for the historical information as of September 30, 2016 and for the period from June 15, 2016 (date of incorporation) through September 30, 2016, the information provided below is unaudited.

The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2016 gives effect to the completion of the initial public offering (including recording $3.5 million of unamortized stock-based compensation expense related to the redemption of the Class B common stock to additional paid-in capital and accumulated deficit), the acquisition of our Initial Property and the entry into the related lease agreement, and the payment of a consulting fee and reimbursement of other costs to IGP Advisers from the net proceeds of the initial public offering, as if the closing of the offering and the acquisition of our Initial Property occurred on September 30, 2016. The unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 and the nine months ended September 30, 2016 give effect to the completion of the initial public offering, the acquisition of our Initial Property and the entry into the related lease agreement, as if the completion of the offering and the acquisition of our Initial Property had occurred on January 1, 2015. The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 includes a reduction of $200,000 of general and administrative expense to eliminate the non-recurring stock-based compensation expense associated with all shares of the Class B common stock being redeemed immediately before the closing of this offering for par value.

The unaudited pro forma financial information incorporates certain assumptions that are included in the Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only, and is not necessarily indicative of future results of operations or financial condition and should not be viewed as indicative of future results of operations or financial condition. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not purport to represent what our actual financial position or results of operations would have been as of or for the periods indicated had the transactions been completed as of the date indicated.

You should read the following selected historical and pro forma financial information together with “Management’s Discussion and Analyses of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our historical consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, included elsewhere in this prospectus. As of the date of this prospectus, we have not commenced any operations because we are in our organizational state. We will not commence any significant operations until we have completed this offering.

		For the Year Ended December 31, 2015								For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
		Historical				Pro Forma				Historical				Pro Forma
Statement of operations data:
Revenues:
Rental income		$	—			$	5,628,169			$	—			$	4,221,127
Total revenues			—				5,628,169				—				4,221,127
Expenses:
Depreciation and amortization			—				641,429				—				481,072
General and administrative (1)			—				—				200,000				—
Total expenses			—				641,429				200,000				481,072
Net income (loss)		$	—			$	4,986,740			$	(200,000	)		$	3,740,055
Net income (loss) per share		$	—			$	2.89			$	(0.39	)		$	2.16
Weighted average shares outstanding (2)							1,728,495				508,065				1,728,495

(1)

The unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations do not include any general and administrative expenses expected to be incurred to operate as a public company as such expenses are not yet known or factually supportable. We expect annual costs for items such as legal, accounting,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		As of September 30, 2016
		Historical				Pro Forma
Balance sheet data:
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	508			$	62,962,474
Property escrow deposit			375,000				—
Buildings			—				22,450,000
Land			—				7,600,000
Total real estate investments			—				30,050,000
Total assets		$	375,508			$	93,012,474
Liabilities:
Security deposit		$	—			$	2,112,474
Due to IGP Advisers, a related party			375,000				—
Total liabilities			375,000				2,112,474
Stockholders’ Equity:
Class A common stock			—				5,000
Class B common stock			508				—
Additional paid-in-capital			200,000				95,145,000
Accumulated deficit			(200,000	)			(4,250,000	)
Total stockholders’ equity			508				90,900,000
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	375,508			$	93,012,474

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

impair our ability to renew or re-lease properties and the ability of our tenants to fulfill their lease obligations and could materially and adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase rental rates for our properties.

Conditions in Our Markets

Positive or negative changes in regulatory, economic or other conditions, drought, and natural disasters in the markets where we acquire properties may affect our overall financial performance.

Competitive Environment

We face competition from a diverse mix of market participants, including but not limited to, other companies with similar business models, independent investors, hedge funds and other real estate investors, hard money lenders, as well as would be clients, cannabis operators themselves, all of whom may compete with us in our efforts to acquire real estate zoned for cannabis cultivation and production operations. Competition from others may diminish our opportunities to acquire a desired property on favorable terms or at all. In addition, this competition may put pressure on us to reduce the rental rates below those that we expect to charge for the properties that we acquire, which would adversely affect our financial results.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Management must make significant assumptions in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Upon acquisition of property, we allocate the purchase price of the properties in accordance with guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, under FASB Accounting Standard Codification 805, Business Combinations , based upon the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which generally consists of land, buildings, site improvements, and furniture and fixtures. We allocate the purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property by valuing the property as if it were vacant. If the acquisition does not meet the definition of a business, we record the acquisition as an asset acquisition. For asset acquisitions, the purchase price allocation is based upon the relative fair values of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed. For transactions that are business combinations, acquisition costs are expensed as incurred and restructuring costs that do not meet the definition of a liability at the acquisition date are expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition date. For transactions that are an asset acquisition, acquisition costs are capitalized as incurred.

Another significant judgment must be made as to if, and when, impairment losses should be taken on our properties when events or a change in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. A provision is made for impairment if estimated future operating cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) plus estimated disposition proceeds (undiscounted) are less than the current book value of the property. Key inputs that we utilize in this analysis include projected rental rates, estimated holding periods, historical sales and releases, capital expenditures, and property sales capitalization rates. If a property is held for sale, it is carried at the lower of carrying cost or estimated fair value, less estimated cost to sell. The carrying value of our real estate is anticipated to be the largest component of our consolidated balance sheet. Our strategy of primarily holding properties, long-term, directly decreases the likelihood of their carrying values not being recoverable, thus requiring the recognition of an impairment. However, if our strategy, or one or more of the above assumptions were to change in the future, an impairment may need to be recognized. If events should occur that require us to reduce the carrying value of our real estate by recording provisions for impairment, they could have a material impact on our results of operations.

Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable

We anticipate that all leases will be triple-net leases and will be accounted for as operating leases. Under this method, leases that have fixed and determinable rent increases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Any rental revenue contingent upon a tenant’s sales is recognized only after the tenant exceeds its sales breakpoint. Rental increases based upon changes in the CPI are recognized only after the changes in the indexes have occurred and are then applied according to the lease agreements. In certain cases, our leases may contain reimbursement obligations. Contractually obligated reimbursements from tenants for recoverable real estate taxes and operating expenses will be included in tenant reimbursements in the period when such costs are incurred.

We will recognize an allowance for doubtful accounts relating to accounts receivable for amounts deemed uncollectible. We consider tenant specific issues, such as financial stability and ability to pay, when determining collectability of accounts receivable and appropriate allowances to record.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation for equity awards is based on the grant date fair value of the equity instrument and is recognized over the requisite service period.

Gain on Sales of Properties

When real estate is sold, the related net book value of the applicable assets is removed and a gain from the sale is recognized in our consolidated statements of operations. We will record a gain from the sale of real estate provided that various criteria relating to the terms of the sale have been met.

Income Taxes

We have been organized and we intend to elect, and to operate our business so as to qualify, to be taxed as a REIT, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2016 or, if later, the first year in which we have material real estate assets and operations. Under the REIT operating structure, we are permitted to deduct dividends paid to our stockholders in determining our taxable

TABLE OF CONTENTS

income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As long as our dividends equal or exceed our taxable net income, we generally will not be required to pay U.S. federal income tax on such income.

Adoption of New or Revised Accounting Standards

As an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act, we can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. An “emerging growth company” may opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. A decision to opt out, however, is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we can adopt the standard for the private company. This may make comparison of our financial statements with a public company that either is not an “emerging growth company” or is an “emerging growth company” that has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible as different or revised accounting standards may be used.

Results of Operations

As of the date of this prospectus, we have not commenced any operations because we are in our organizational state. We will not commence any significant operations until we have completed this offering. The factors that we anticipate impacting our results of operations in the future are discussed above under the section entitled “— Factors Impacting Our Future Operating Results.”

We recognized stock-based compensation expense of $200,000 for the period from June 15, 2016 (date of incorporation) through September 30, 2016, related to the issuance of Class B common stock to our founders. We estimated the fair value of these shares at the June 15, 2016 grant date and at subsequent modification dates using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The fair value calculation is primarily based on management’s estimates of the probability of its initial public offering and the estimated proceeds of such offering. We expect to recognize the remaining stock-based compensation expense related to the issuance of our Class B common stock of approximately $3.5 million when all of the outstanding Class B common stock is redeemed, at par value of $0.001 per share, immediately before the closing of this offering.

In addition, at the first meeting of the compensation committee of our board of directors after completion of this offering, we expect to award an aggregate of 27,500 restricted shares of Class A common stock to two of our executive officers under the Incentive Plan. We expect to recognize stock compensation expense equal to the fair value of these restricted shares (estimated to be $550,000 based on the price per share of our Class A common stock in this offering) over a service period of six months.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

expect to issue equity and debt securities at times when we believe that our stock price is at a level that allows for the investment of offering proceeds in accretive property acquisitions. We may also issue common stock to permanently finance properties that were previously financed by debt securities. The success of our acquisition strategy may depend, in part, on our ability to access additional capital through issuances of equity securities. There can be no assurance that we will have access to the capital markets at times and on terms that are acceptable to us or make any investments in any properties that meet our investment criteria.

We will pay, or reimburse IGP Advisers and its affiliates, for expenses incurred in connection with our organization and this offering.

Impact of Real Estate and Credit Markets

In the commercial real estate market, property prices generally continue to fluctuate. Likewise, during certain periods, the U.S. credit markets have experienced significant price volatility, dislocations, and liquidity disruptions, which may impact our access to and cost of capital. We continually monitor the commercial real estate and U.S. credit markets carefully and, if required, will make decisions to adjust our business strategy accordingly.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no unconsolidated investments or any other off-balance sheet arrangements.

Interest Rate Risk

We have not issued any debt and have no debt outstanding, so we are not exposed to interest rate changes. At this time, we have no plans at this time to issue debt instruments. It is possible that a property we acquire in the future would be subject to a mortgage, which we may assume.

Impact of Inflation

We intend to enter into leases that generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of increases in the CPI (typically subject to ceilings) or fixed increases. We expect these lease provisions to result in rent increases over time. During times when inflation is greater than increases in rent, as provided for in the leases, rent increases may not keep up with the rate of inflation.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We have not issued any debt and have no debt outstanding, so we are not exposed to interest rate changes. If we were to issue debt or enter into a credit facility in the future, we would be exposed to interest rate changes. At this time, we have no plans at this time to issue debt instruments, other than possibly assuming debt in connection with an acquisition.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Regulated Medical-Use Cannabis Industry

We believe that a convergence of changing public attitudes and increased legalization momentum in various states toward regulated medical-use cannabis creates an attractive opportunity to invest in the industrial real estate sector with a focus on regulated medical-use cannabis facilities. We also believe that the increased sophistication of the regulated medical-use cannabis industry and the development of strong business, operational and compliance practices have made the sector more attractive for investment. Increasingly, stated-licensed, medical-use cannabis cultivation and processing facilities are becoming sophisticated business enterprises that use state-of-the-art technologies and well-honed business and operational processes to maximize product yield and revenues. Additionally, growers and dispensers have developed a growing portfolio of products into which they are able to incorporate legal medical-use cannabis in a safe and appealing manner, including a variety of edibles, drinks and topicals.

In the United States, the development and growth of the regulated medical-use cannabis industry has generally been driven by state law and regulation, and accordingly, the market varies on a state-by-state basis. State laws that legalize and regulate medical-use cannabis allow patients to consume cannabis for medicinal reasons with a doctor’s recommendation subject to various requirements and limitations. States have authorized numerous medical conditions as qualifying conditions for treatment with medical-use cannabis, including but not limited to treatment for cancer, glaucoma, HIV/AIDs, wasting syndrome, pain, nausea, seizures, muscle spasms, multiple sclerosis, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), migraines, arthritis, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s, lupus, residual limb pain, spinal cord injuries, inflammatory bowel disease and terminal illness. As of November 15, 2016, 29 states, plus the District of Columbia, have passed laws allowing their citizens to use medical cannabis.

We believe that the following conditions, which are described in more detail below, create an attractive opportunity to invest in industrial real estate assets that support the regulated medical-use cannabis industry:

Industry Growth and Trends

According to ArcView, nationwide sales of legal cannabis grew to $5.4 billion in 2015, up from $4.6 billion in 2014, of which approximately 92% consisted of medical-use sales. Demand is expected to remain strong in 2016 with legal markets projected to grow to $6.7 billion, according to ArcView, a 24% increase over 2015, as new state medical-use markets, including Nevada, Illinois, Massachusetts and New York, continue to expand. According to ArcView, by 2020, legal market sales are expected to grow to approximately $21.8 billion, of which estimated medical-use sales are expected to be approximately $10.2 billion.

According to ProCon.org, as of March 1, 2016, an estimated 1.2 million people use or were registered to use legalized medical cannabis. As the industry continues to evolve, new ways to consume cannabis are being developed in order for patients to have the treatment needed for their condition in a safe and appealing manner. In addition to smoking and vaporizing of dried leaves, cannabis can be incorporated into a variety of edibles, including cookies, crackers, nut mixes, lollipops, chews, teas, juices, smoothies and sodas, and incorporated into spray products or transdermal patches as well as topicals that have no psychoactive effects, such as salves, ointments, lotions and sprays.

As with any nascent but growing industry, operational and business practices evolve and become more sophisticated over time. We believe that the quality and experience of industry participants and the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

development of sound business, operational and compliance practices have reached a turning point that makes the regulated medical-use cannabis industry attractive for investment at this time.

Shifting Public Attitudes and State Law and Legislative Activity

We believe that the growth of the regulated cannabis industry has been fueled by changing public attitudes in the United States. A 2015 poll by Harris found 81% of Americans support the legalization of cannabis for medical use. Driven in part by this shift in public opinion, three additional states, Florida, Arkansas and North Dakota, voted to legalize medical-use cannabis in November 2016. Anticipated expansion of the market opportunity to these states could be significant.

As of November 15, 2016, 29 states, plus the District of Columbia, have passed laws allowing their citizens to use medical cannabis. The first state to permit the use of cannabis for medicinal purposes was California in 1996, upon adoption of the Compassionate Care Act. The law allowed doctors to recommend cannabis for serious medical conditions and patients were permitted to use, possess and grow cannabis themselves. Several other states adopted medical-use laws in 1998 and 1999, and the remaining medical-use states adopted their laws on various dates through 2016.

In 2016, a number of state legislative or ballot measures passed that are expected to increase the size of the regulated cannabis industry. Some of the more significant measures are summarized below.

Source: Batter Up:  The Next States to Legalize, Marijuana Business Magazine, January 2016; Marijuana Policy Project.

Following the approval of medical or adult-use cannabis, state programs must be developed and businesses must be licensed before commencing cannabis sales. Some states have developed the necessary procedures and licensing requirements quickly, while other states have taken years to develop their programs for production and sales of cannabis. According to Marijuana Business Daily, the average amount of time that elapsed between the legalization of medical cannabis sales and the opening of the first dispensaries in six states that recently commenced sales was 27 months. Also, according to Marijuana Business Daily, there are signs of industry maturation, and states are increasingly demonstrating an ability to efficiently and quickly establish regulatory frameworks following legalization. This is particularly true when adult-use cannabis is legalized in states where regulated medical-use cannabis systems are already in place. For example, according

TABLE OF CONTENTS

to Marijuana Business Daily, the average amount of time that elapsed between voters approving adult-use cannabis production and sales to the opening of the first stores in Colorado, Washington and Oregon was 15 months.

Even where regulatory frameworks for cannabis production and sales are in place, states tend to revise these rules over time. These revisions often impact sales, making it difficult to predict the potential of new markets. States may restrict the number of cannabis businesses permitted, limit the medical conditions that are eligible for cannabis treatment or require registration of doctors and/or patients, each of which can limit growth of the cannabis industry in those states. Alternatively, states may relax their initial regulations relating to cannabis production and sales, which would likely accelerate growth of the cannabis industry in such states.

The Federal Legal Landscape

Cannabis is classified as a Schedule I controlled substance by the DEA and the U.S. Department of Justice with no medical use, and therefore it is illegal to grow, possess and consume cannabis under federal law. The CSA bans cannabis-related businesses; the possession, cultivation, and production of cannabis-infused products; and the distribution of cannabis and products derived from it. Moreover, on two separate occasions the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the CSA trumps state law. That means that the federal government has the option of enforcing U.S. drug laws, creating a climate of legal uncertainty regarding the production and sale of medical-use cannabis. Although the CSA’s basic prohibition remains in force, the U.S. Department of Justice, under the Obama administration, has issued memoranda characterizing enforcement of federal cannabis prohibitions under the CSA as an inefficient use of federal investigative and prosecutorial resources when state regulatory and enforcement efforts are effective with respect to enumerated federal enforcement priorities under the CSA. In such instances, the U.S. Department of Justice instructs federal prosecutors that enforcement of state law by state and local law enforcement should remain the primary means of addressing cannabis-related activity, including cultivation and distribution of cannabis. Congress has also enacted an omnibus spending bill including a provision prohibiting the U.S. Department of Justice (which includes the DEA) from using funds appropriated by that bill to prevent states from implementing their medical-use cannabis laws. This provision, however, is effective only until December 9, 2016 and must be renewed by Congress in subsequent years. In order to extend the prohibition, it must be specifically included in the fiscal year 2017 Commerce, Justice, and Science (CJS) Appropriations bill – the germane bill. Currently, only the Senate version of the CJS Appropriations bill includes the prohibition and the House version does not. See the section entitled “Business — Government Regulation.”

Cannabis reform has gained the support of a bipartisan coalition of members of Congress, some of whom have introduced legislation on various reform-related topics. Certain proposed legislation introduced into the 114 ^th Congress is summarized below. If passed, this legislation would address certain conflicts existing between state and federal law. In addition, although there is no assurance that any of these proposals will be approved, that the funds prohibition will be renewed or that the U.S. Department of Justice’s enforcement position will not change, we believe that the number and frequency of these proposals, when coupled with changing public attitudes and the prospect of legalization in additional states, indicate that the size and risk profile of the market in which our prospective tenants operate will likely improve.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Access to Capital

To date, the status of medical-use cannabis under federal law has significantly limited the ability of state-licensed industry participants to fully access the U.S. banking system and traditional financing sources. These limitations, when combined with the high costs of maintaining licensed and stringently regulated medical-use cannabis facilities (including meeting extensive zoning requirements), substantially increase the cost of production. While we anticipate that future changes in federal and state laws may ultimately open up financing options that have not been available to date in this industry, we believe that such changes will take time, thereby creating an opportunity over the next few years to provide our sale-leaseback solutions to state-licensed industry participants that lack access to traditional financing sources.

Market Opportunity and Associated Risks

We plan to take advantage of this market opportunity by purchasing the medical-use cannabis facilities of state-licensed growers with a focus on properties that we believe also have potential for long-term appreciation in value. We believe that our sale-leaseback solutions offer an attractive alternative to licensed cultivators who lack access to traditional financing alternatives. We intend to acquire medical-use cannabis facilities in states that permit medical-use cannabis cultivation, including New York, Illinois, Washington, Oregon, Nevada, California, Arizona, Massachusetts and Maryland. We expect that acquisition opportunities will continue to expand as additional states legalize medical-use cannabis and license new cultivators.

Notwithstanding the foregoing market opportunity and trends, and despite legalization at the state level, we continue to believe that the current state of federal law creates significant uncertainty and potential risks associated with investing in medical-use cannabis facilities. For a more complete description of these risks, see the sections entitled “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Regulation” and “Business — Governmental Regulation.”

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe that we have the following competitive strengths:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Business Objectives and Growth Strategies

Our principal business objective is to maximize stockholder returns through a combination of (1) distributions to our stockholders, (2) sustainable long-term growth in cash flows from increased rents, which we hope to pass on to stockholders in the form of increased distributions, and (3) potential long-term appreciation in the value of our properties from capital gains upon future sale. Our primary strategy to achieve our business objective is to acquire and own a portfolio of medical-use cannabis facilities leased to tenants holding the requisite state licenses to operate in the regulated medical-use cannabis industry. This strategy includes the following components:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Target Markets

We anticipate that our initial target markets will be New York, Illinois, Washington, Oregon, Nevada, California, Arizona, Massachusetts and Maryland. We currently have a definitive agreement to purchase one medical-use cannabis cultivation facility in New York and non-binding letters of intent to purchase one medical-use cannabis cultivation facility in Illinois and four medical-use cannabis cultivation facilities in California.

The following is a list of the states that have legalized cannabis for medical use in some form as of November 15, 2016:

Year (1)		Jurisdiction (1)				Population as of July 1, 2015 (in millions) (2)
1996			California				39.1
1998			Washington				7.2
1998			Oregon				4.0
1999			Alaska				0.7
1999			Maine				1.3
2000			Hawaii				1.4
2000			Colorado				5.5
2000			Nevada				2.9
2004			Vermont				0.6
2004			Montana				1.0
2006			Rhode Island				1.1
2007			New Mexico				2.1
2008			Michigan				9.9
2010			District of Columbia				0.7
2010			New Jersey				9.0
2010			Arizona				6.8
2011			Delaware				0.9
2012			Massachusetts				6.8
2012			Connecticut				3.6
2013			Illinois				12.9
2013			New Hampshire				1.3
2014			Maryland				6.0
2014			Minnesota				5.5
2014			New York				19.8
2016			Louisiana				4.7
2016			Pennsylvania				12.8
2016			Ohio				11.6
2016			Florida				20.3
2016			Arkansas				3.0
2016			North Dakota				0.3
Total			30				203.3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Although the above states have all approved the medical use of cannabis, the applicable state and local laws and regulations vary widely. For example, most states’ laws allow commercial production and sales through dispensaries and set forth rigorous licensing requirements; in other states the licensing rules are unclear. In some states, dispensaries are mandated to operate on a not-for-profit basis. Some states permit home cultivation activities. The states also differ on the form in which cannabis can be sold. For example, some states do not permit cannabis-infused products such as concentrates, edibles and topicals.

According to ArcView, the following is a description of the regulated medical-use cannabis market opportunity in the states we currently intend to target:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

It is expected that new states that entered the marketplace in 2016, may drive industry growth in 2018 and 2019, when cannabis businesses in such states could begin to generate revenues. Experience shows that it generally takes one to two years for a state to establish regulations and for cannabis businesses to begin to generate revenue from operations. ArcView’s projected increase in legal cannabis sales by 2020 is, in part, attributable to this delay between legalization and revenue generation. In addition, continued development of the regulated medical-use cannabis industry depends upon continued legislative authorization of medical-use cannabis at the state level. Progress in the regulated medical-use cannabis industry, while encouraging, is not assured and any number of factors could slow or halt progress in this area.

Our Target Properties

We intend to acquire specialized industrial real estate assets operated by state-licensed medical-use cannabis growers through sale-leaseback transactions and third-party purchases. In sale-leaseback transactions, concurrently upon closing of the acquisition, we will lease the properties back to the state-licensed growers under long-term, triple-net lease agreements. We intend to target properties owned by growers that have been among the top candidates in the rigorous state licensing process and have been granted one or more licenses to operate multiple facilities. Based on our review of potential acquisitions in connection with this offering, indoor cultivation facilities generally appear to have similar shells as standard light industrial buildings. However, based on our initial diligence, the medical-use cultivation process typically requires a finely tuned environment to achieve consistent high quality and specificity in cannabinoid levels and to maximize yields, which translates into certain capital improvements in the building’s infrastructure. These improvements can include enhanced HVAC systems for climate and humidity control, high capacity plumbing systems, specialized lighting systems, and sophisticated building management, cultivation monitoring and security systems. Through this sale-leaseback strategy, we will serve as a source of capital to these licensed medical-use cannabis growers, which will allow them to redeploy their sale proceeds back into their core operations to grow their business and achieve higher returns.

We are actively seeking and evaluating medical-use cannabis facilities to purchase with the net proceeds of this offering. We have entered into a definitive purchase agreement for the acquisition of our Initial Property, a 127,000-square foot industrial property located in New York for a purchase price of approximately $30.0 million in a sale-leaseback transaction. See the section entitled “— Our Initial Property” below. In addition, our senior management team has identified and is in various stages of reviewing in excess of $88 million of additional potential properties for acquisition, which amount is estimated based on the sellers’ asking prices for the properties, preliminary discussions with the sellers or our internal assessment of the values of such properties after taking into account the current and expected annualized lease revenue, operating history, age and condition of the property and other relevant factors. We have entered into two non-binding letters of intent with respect to five properties, comprising approximately $80 million of these potential acquisitions. There can be no assurance that we will consummate the acquisition of any of the properties in our current acquisition pipeline on the terms anticipated, or at all.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our letters of intent provide that the purchase and sale of the property will only occur pursuant to a definitive and binding purchase and sale agreement between the parties, if any. Neither we nor the potential seller has any obligation to negotiate further or pursue a transaction. The letters of intent set forth only general terms, the majority of which are subject to further negotiation and revision. The purchase prices remain subject to our completion of due diligence, which we have not yet commenced. Based on the foregoing, there can be no assurance that we and the sellers will enter into a definitive binding agreement on the terms set forth in the letter of intent, or at all. Any definitive purchase and sale agreement would need to address numerous conditions to closing, including obtaining third-party consents and approvals that are beyond our control and due diligence, including receipt of satisfactory engineering, environmental, survey and title reports. Accordingly, we have concluded that the acquisition of the properties subject to non-binding letters of intent are not currently “probable.”

Our Initial Property

We have entered into a definitive purchase agreement for the acquisition of our Initial Property, a 127,000-square foot industrial property located in Montgomery, New York for a purchase price of approximately $30 million. We expect to acquire our Initial Property with the net proceeds of this offering. While the acquisition of our Initial Property remains subject to ongoing diligence and the satisfaction of closing conditions, at this time, we have determined that the acquisition of our Initial Property is “probable.” There can be no assurance, however, that we will consummate the acquisition of our Initial Property on the terms anticipated, or at all.

Property Description.   Our Initial Property consists of approximately 37 acres of usable land, which includes three buildings comprising approximately 127,000 square feet. Our Initial Property is also expected to support the future development of additional medical-use cannabis cultivation facilities totaling approximately 204,000 additional square feet. The current property owner and future tenant is licensed by the state of New York to operate a medical-use cannabis cultivation and processing facility, and has operated such facility at the property since June 2016, when construction of the facility was substantially completed.

Acquisition Terms .  On August 22, 2016, we entered into a definitive purchase agreement to acquire our Initial Property from PharmaCann LLC in a sale-leaseback transaction for an aggregate purchase price of $30 million. The purchase price for our Initial Property was determined by negotiation with the seller after taking into consideration the expected annualized lease revenue, expected lease, operating history, age and condition of the property, and other relevant factors. We paid a $375,000 deposit upon execution of the purchase agreement that is refundable in the event we do not close our initial public offering within a specified timeframe. The $375,000 deposit was paid on our behalf by IGP Advisers and is to be repaid with the proceeds of this offering. The definitive agreement provides for a due diligence period during which we have the right to access and inspect the property and may terminate the agreement if we determine that the property does not meet our criteria. Following the diligence period, we have agreed to purchase the property “as is,” subject to all faults and conditions thereon, which increases the risk that we may have to remedy defects or costs without recourse to the prior owner. The closing of the purchase is subject to the completion of this offering and customary closing conditions. The purchase agreement provides that closing is to occur within 30 days after the expiration of the due diligence period and the agreement is terminable at the option of either party thereafter. We intend to purchase our Initial Property as soon as reasonably practicable after satisfaction of all closing conditions, including the closing of this offering.

Lease Terms.   Upon the closing of the acquisition, we will lease 100% of our Initial Property to the seller of the property, PharmaCann LLC, to operate a medical-use cannabis cultivation and processing facility in compliance with applicable state and local law and in compliance with the terms of the tenant’s license from the state of New York. PharmaCann LLC is a start-up business that commenced retail operations in late 2015. PharmaCann LLC secured one of only five licenses granted to date in New York for the cultivation and dispensing of medical-use cannabis. As of the date of this prospectus, PharmaCann LLC operates two cultivation and processing facilities and four registered medical-use cannabis dispensaries in Illinois, and one cultivation and processing facility and four registered medical-use cannabis dispensaries in New York. The lease for our Initial Property is a triple-net lease, with the tenant responsible for paying all structural repairs, maintenance expenses, insurance and taxes related to the property. The base rent is approximately $319,580 per month, which shall be increased annually at a rate based on the higher of (i) 4% or (ii) 75% of the CPI.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We also receive a property management fee under the lease equal to 1.5% of the then-current base rent throughout the term, and supplemental base rent for the first five years of the term at a rate of $105,477 per month. Together, the annualized initial base rent, property management fee and supplemental base rent equate to approximately 17.2% of the purchase price of our Initial Property. The lease term is 15 years, with two options to extend the term of the lease for two additional five-year periods. As a start-up business, PharmaCann LLC has not been profitable. During 2016, we expect that PharmaCann LLC will continue to incur losses as its expenses increase in connection with the expansion of PharmaCann LLC’s operations. As a result, at least initially, we expect that PharmaCann LLC will make rent payments to us from proceeds from the sale of the property or cash on hand, and not funds from operations.

Our Financing Strategy

We intend to meet our long-term liquidity needs through cash flow from operations and the issuance of equity and debt securities, including common stock, preferred stock and long-term notes. Where possible, we also may issue limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership to acquire properties from existing owners seeking a tax-deferred transaction. We expect to issue equity and debt securities at times when we believe that our stock price is at a level that allows for the reinvestment of offering proceeds in accretive property acquisitions. We may also issue common stock to permanently finance properties that were previously financed by debt securities. However, we cannot assure you that we will have access to the capital markets at times and on terms that are acceptable to us. Our investment guidelines initially provide that our aggregate borrowings (secured and unsecured) will not exceed 50% of the cost of our tangible assets at the time of any new borrowing, subject to our board of directors’ discretion.

Our Leases

The following is a general description of the type of lease we typically expect to enter into with our tenants. The terms and conditions of any actual lease may vary from those described below. If we determine that the terms of a lease at a property, in the context of the entire investment, are favorable to us, we may enter into leases with terms that are substantially different from the terms described below.

We intend to acquire industrial medical-use cannabis facilities and lease them to tenants who are the state-licensed operators of such facilities. While we target the acquisition of medical-use cannabis facilities, our leases do not prohibit cannabis cultivation for adult-use that is permissible under the state and local laws where our facilities are located. Consequently, certain of our tenants may subsequently cultivate adult-use cannabis in our medical-use cannabis facilities, if permitted by such state and local laws. Our leases with tenants will be triple-net lease arrangements, where we as the landlord have limited exposure to expense escalations. While the structure of our leases may vary depending on the type and location of the property, we generally seek to structure our leases so that the tenant is responsible for taxes, maintenance, insurance, and structural repairs with respect to the premises throughout the lease term. We expect that our lease structure will offer predictability and stability of our expenses, which we believe will help us to achieve stable and consistent cash distributions to our stockholders.

We expect to enter into lease agreements for a term of 15 years with two consecutive five-year renewal options. We expect that the leases will commence concurrent with the closing of our purchase of the property. We may acquire properties and enter into lease agreements with shorter lease terms if the property benefits from an attractive location, if the property is difficult to replace or if the property has other significant and favorable real estate attributes. We also may enter into leases with longer lease terms if we believe the potential investment yield is particularly attractive.

Under most commercial leases, tenants are obligated to pay a predetermined annual base rent on a monthly basis. We expect that our leases will contain annual rent adjustments at the rate based on the higher of (i) 4% or (ii) 75% of the CPI. The terms of our leases will require that our tenants make rental payments via check or wire transfer. A tenant may experience difficulty curing a default of the manner of payment requirement under our lease due to continued reluctance of banks to accept clients who operate in the medical-use cannabis industry. See the section entitled “Risk Factors — We and our tenants may have difficulty accessing the service of banks, which may make it difficult to contract for real estate needs.”

Generally, our leases will require each tenant to procure, at its expense, commercial general liability insurance. The tenant typically will pay for property insurance covering the structures for the full replacement

TABLE OF CONTENTS

value and naming the owner as the additional insured on the policy. In addition, we generally expect to obtain loss-of-rent (business interruption) insurance for a period of approximately 36 months in case of property damage, fire, or other instances which render the property uninhabitable. Tenants will be required to provide proof of insurance by furnishing a certificate of insurance to us upon request.

We do not typically expect to permit leases to be assigned or subleased without our prior written consent. If we do consent to an assignment or sublease, generally we expect the terms of such consent to provide that the original tenant will remain fully liable under the lease unless we release that original tenant from its obligations.

Certain properties that we acquire may be subject to ground leases. A ground lease agreement permits a tenant to develop and/or operate a land parcel (property) during the lease period, after which the land parcel and all improvements revert back to the property owner. Under a ground lease, property improvements are owned by the property owner unless an exception is created and all relevant taxes incurred during the lease period are paid for by the tenant. Ground leases typically have a long duration generally ranging from 50 to 99 years with additional extension options.

Risk Management

We estimate that we will purchase approximately five to 10 properties with the net proceeds of this offering and will attempt to diversify the investment size and location of our portfolio of properties in order to manage our portfolio-level risk. Over the long term, we intend that no single property will exceed 25% of our total assets and that no single tenant will exceed 30% of our total assets. However, until a sufficient number of properties are acquired, we anticipate that we will have single properties and single tenants in excess of these long-term targets.

We expect that single tenants will occupy our properties pursuant to triple-net lease arrangements in general and, therefore, the success of our investments will be materially dependent on the financial stability of these tenants. We intend to target tenants that have been among the top candidates in the state licensing process and have been granted one or more licenses to operate multiple facilities. We expect, however, that most of our tenants will be start-up businesses that have little or no revenue and, at least initially, will make rent payments to us from the sale proceeds of a sale-leaseback transaction with us or cash on hand. We expect to evaluate the credit quality of our tenants and any guarantors on an ongoing basis by reviewing, where available, the publicly filed financial reports, press releases and other publicly available industry information regarding our tenants and any guarantors. In addition, we will monitor the payment history data for all of our tenants and, in some instances, we intend to monitor our tenants by periodically conducting site visits and meeting with the tenants to discuss their operations. In many instances, we will generally not be entitled to financial results or other credit-related data from our tenants. See the section entitled “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business.”

Investment Guidelines

Our board of directors will adopt the following investment guidelines:

The restrictions on investments in any single property or in properties having the same tenant described above are long-term targets, which we do not expect to achieve with the net proceeds of this offering. Subject

TABLE OF CONTENTS

to oversight by our board of directors, our senior management team will oversee our investment portfolio and compliance with our investment guidelines and policies. These investment guidelines may be changed or waived by our board of directors without the approval of our stockholders. We will disclose any material changes to our investment guidelines in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of the Form 10-Q or Form 10-K for the period in which the change was made, or in a Current Report on Form 8-K, if required by the rules of the SEC or the board of directors believes it advisable, in their sole discretion. Furthermore, it is expected that our board of directors will delegate authority to a management investment committee, generally comprised of our executive officers, for certain investments, subject to specified parameters, which may include, among other things, dollar limits on investments on an individual basis and in the aggregate for any calendar year; that any investment not be with a “related party” as defined in applicable securities laws or our related party transaction policy; and that the investments be limited to stabilized medical-use cannabis facilities. Our board would retain approval authority over any investments that do not fall within the authority of the management investment committee, and would periodically evaluate this delegation of authority and make any changes that the board deems appropriate in its discretion.

Our Operating Structure

We were formed as a Maryland corporation on June 15, 2016. We intend to conduct business in an UPREIT structure through our Operating Partnership. We are the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership and, upon completion of this offering, we will own, directly or through a subsidiary, 100% of the limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership. Our board of directors will oversee our business and affairs.

Our Operating Partnership was formed as a Delaware limited partnership on June 20, 2016 and will commence operations upon the completion of this offering. Following the completion of this offering, substantially all of our assets will be held by, and our operations will be conducted through, our Operating Partnership. We will contribute the net proceeds from this offering to our Operating Partnership in exchange for limited partnership interests. Our interest in our Operating Partnership will generally entitle us to share in cash distributions from, and in the profits and losses of, our Operating Partnership in proportion to our percentage ownership, which is currently 100%. As the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership, we generally will have the exclusive power under the partnership agreement to manage and conduct our Operating Partnership’s business and affairs, subject to certain limited approval and voting rights of the limited partners, which are described in the section entitled “Our Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership Agreement.” In the future, we may issue limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership from time to time in connection with property acquisitions, as compensation or otherwise.

IGP Advisers, a company that is owned by Messrs. Gold, Smithers and Fahey, is funding certain of our organization, offering and other costs. In addition, IGP Advisers funded an earnest money deposit pursuant to the purchase agreement for our Initial Property. IGP Advisers will seek reimbursement from us for these expenses upon completion of this offering and the acquisition of our Initial Property.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The chart below reflects our corporate structure after giving effect to this offering and the issuance of shares of our Class A common stock as described in this prospectus, including (i) 150,000 shares of Class A common stock that our executive chairman may purchase in this offering at the public offering price and (ii) grants of an aggregate of 27,500 shares of Class A common stock to two of our executive officers under the Incentive Plan that are expected to be approved at the first meeting of the compensation committee of our board of directors after completion of this offering.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Governmental Regulation

Agricultural Regulation

The properties that we intend to acquire will be used primarily for cultivation and production of medical-use cannabis and will be subject to the laws, ordinances and regulations of state, local and federal governments, including laws, ordinances and regulations involving land use and usage, water rights, treatment methods, disturbance, the environment, and eminent domain.

Each governmental jurisdiction has its own distinct laws, ordinances and regulations governing the use of agricultural lands. Many such laws, ordinances and regulations seek to regulate water usage and water runoff because water can be in limited supply, as is the case in certain locations including Illinois and New York, where we anticipate our initial properties will be located. In addition, runoff from rain or from irrigation is governed by laws, ordinances and regulations from state, local and federal governments. Additionally, if any of the water used on or running off from our properties flows to any rivers, streams, ponds, the ocean or other waters, there may be specific laws, ordinances and regulations governing the amount of pollutants, including sediments, nutrients and pesticides, that such water may contain.

We expect that the properties in our portfolio will, at the time of acquisition, have sources of water, including wells and/or surface water, that will provide sufficient amounts of water necessary for the current growing operations at each location. However, should the need arise for additional water from wells and/or surface water sources, we may be required to obtain additional permits or approvals or to make other required notices prior to developing or using such water sources. Permits for drilling water wells or withdrawing surface water may be required by federal, state and local governmental entities pursuant to laws, ordinances, regulations or other requirements, and such permits may be difficult to obtain due to drought, the limited supply of available water within the districts of the states in which our properties are located or other reasons.

In addition to the regulation of water usage and water runoff, state, local and federal governments also seek to regulate the type, quantity and method of use of chemicals and materials for growing crops, including fertilizers, pesticides and nutrient rich materials. Such regulations could include restricting or preventing the use of such chemicals and materials near residential housing or near water sources. Further, some regulations have strictly forbidden or significantly limited the use of certain chemicals and materials. Licenses, permits and approvals must be obtained from governmental authorities requiring such licenses, permits and approvals before chemicals and materials can be used at grow facilities. Reports on the usage of such chemicals and materials must be submitted pursuant to applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations and the terms of the specific licenses, permits and approvals. Failure to comply with laws, ordinances and regulations, to obtain required licenses, permits and approvals or to comply with the terms of such licenses, permits and approvals could result in fines, penalties and/or imprisonment.

The use of land for agricultural purposes in certain jurisdictions is also subject to regulations governing the protection of endangered species. When agricultural lands border, or are in close proximity to, national parks, protected natural habitats or wetlands, the agricultural operations on such properties must comply with laws, ordinances and regulations related to the use of chemicals and materials and avoid disturbance of habitats, wetlands or other protected areas.

Because the properties we own will be used for growing cannabis, there may be other additional land use and zoning regulations at the state or local level that affect our properties that may not apply to other types of agricultural uses. For example, both New York and Illinois require stringent security systems in place at grow facilities, and also require stringent procedures for disposal of waste materials.

As an owner of agricultural lands, we may be liable or responsible for the actions or inactions of our tenants with respect to these laws, regulations and ordinances.

Environmental Matters

Our properties and the operations thereon are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, including laws relating to water, air, solid wastes and hazardous substances. Our properties and the operations thereon are also subject to federal, state and local laws, ordinances, regulations and requirements related to the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, as well as comparable state

TABLE OF CONTENTS

statutes relating to the health and safety of our employees and others working on our properties. Although we believe that we and our tenants are in material compliance with these requirements, there can be no assurance that we will not incur significant costs, civil and criminal penalties and liabilities, including those relating to claims for damages to persons, property or the environment resulting from operations at our properties. See the section entitled “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business — Potential liability for environmental matters could adversely affect our financial condition.”

Real Estate Industry Regulation

Generally, the ownership and operation of real properties is subject to various laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to zoning, land use, water rights, wastewater, storm water runoff and lien sale rights and procedures. These laws, ordinances or regulations, such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response and Compensation Liability Act and its state analogs, or any changes to any such laws, ordinances or regulations, could result in or increase the potential liability for environmental conditions or circumstances existing, or created by tenants or others, on our properties. Laws related to upkeep, safety and taxation requirements may result in significant unanticipated expenditures, loss of our properties or other impairments to operations, any of which would adversely affect our cash flows from operating activities.

Our property management activities, to the extent we are required to engage in them due to lease defaults by tenants or vacancies on certain properties, will likely be subject to state real estate brokerage laws and regulations as determined by the particular real estate commission for each state.

State Laws Applicable to the Medical-Use Cannabis Industry

In most states that have legalized cannabis in some form, the growing and/or dispensing of cannabis generally requires that the operator obtain one or more licenses in accordance with applicable state requirements. In addition, many states regulate various aspects of the growing and/or dispensing of medical-use cannabis. For example, New York limits the types of strains that can be grown, prices are set by the State Program Commissioner, a registered pharmacist is required to be on the premises of all dispensaries during hours of operation, and both flower and edibles are prohibited. Local governments in some cases also impose rules and regulations on the manner of operating cannabis businesses. As a result, applicable state and local laws and regulations vary widely. As a result of licensing requirements, if our tenants default under their leases, we may not be able to find new tenants that have the requisite license to engage in the cultivation of medical cannabis on the properties.

Federal Laws Applicable to the Medical-Use Cannabis Industry

Cannabis is a Schedule I controlled substance under the CSA. Even in those jurisdictions in which the manufacture and use of medical cannabis has been legalized at the state level, the possession, use, cultivation, and transfer of cannabis remains a violation of federal law. Federal law criminalizing the use of cannabis preempts state laws that legalize its use for medicinal or adult-retail purposes, and therefore strict enforcement of federal law regarding cannabis would likely result in our inability to execute our business plan.

The U.S. Department of Justice, under the Obama administration, has issued memoranda, including the so-called “Cole Memo” on August 29, 2013, characterizing enforcement of federal cannabis prohibitions under the CSA to prosecute those complying with state regulatory systems allowing the use, manufacture and distribution of medical cannabis as an inefficient use of federal investigative and prosecutorial resources when state regulatory and enforcement efforts are effective with respect to enumerated federal enforcement priorities under the CSA. In the “Cole Memo,” the U.S. Department of Justice provided guidance to all federal prosecutors indicating that federal enforcement of the CSA against cannabis-related conduct should be focused on eight priorities, which are to prevent: (1) distribution of cannabis to minors; (2) revenue from sale of cannabis to criminal enterprises, gangs and cartels; (3) transfer of cannabis from states where it is legal to states where it is illegal; (4) cannabis activity from being a pretext for trafficking of other illegal drugs or illegal activity; (5) violence or use of firearms in cannabis cultivation and distribution; (6) drugged driving and adverse public health consequences from cannabis use; (7) growth of cannabis on federal lands; and (8) cannabis possession or use on federal property.

In addition, as it did for the fiscal year 2015, Congress enacted an omnibus spending bill for fiscal year 2016 including a provision prohibiting the U.S. Department of Justice (which includes the DEA) from using

TABLE OF CONTENTS

funds appropriated by that bill to prevent states from implementing their medical-use cannabis laws. This provision, however, is effective only until December 9, 2016 and must be renewed by Congress in subsequent years. In order to extend the prohibition, it must be specifically included in the fiscal year 2017 Commerce, Justice, and Science (CJS) Appropriations bill – the germane bill. Currently, only the Senate version of the CJS Appropriations bill includes the prohibition and the House version does not. In USA vs. McIntosh , the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that this provision prohibits the U.S. Department of Justice from spending funds from relevant appropriations acts to prosecute individuals who engage in conduct permitted by state medical-use cannabis laws and who strictly comply with such laws. However, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion, which only applies in the states of Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii and Idaho, also held that persons who do not strictly comply with all state laws and regulations regarding the distribution, possession and cultivation of medical-use cannabis have engaged in conduct that is unauthorized, and in such instances the U.S. Department of Justice may prosecute those individuals.

We do not intend to acquire properties from or lease properties to companies whose activities involve or support those enumerated in the Cole Memo, but federal prosecutors have significant discretion in their interpretation of these priorities. Therefore, no assurance can be given that the federal prosecutor in each judicial district where we purchase a property will agree that the activities of our tenant on the property located in such prosecutor’s district do not involve those enumerated in the Cole Memo. There is also no guarantee that the current administration or future administrations will not revise the federal enforcement priorities enumerated in the Cole Memo or otherwise choose to strictly enforce the federal laws governing cannabis production or distribution. Any such change in the federal government’s current enforcement posture with respect to state-licensed cultivation of medical-use cannabis would result in our inability to execute our business plan and we would likely suffer significant losses with respect to our investment in medical-use cannabis facilities in the United States.

Laws Applicable to Banking for Medical-Use Cannabis Industry

All banks are subject to federal law, whether the bank is a national bank or state-chartered bank. At a minimum, all banks maintain federal deposit insurance which requires adherence to federal law. Violation of federal law could subject a bank to loss of its charter. Financial transactions involving proceeds generated by cannabis-related conduct can form the basis for prosecution under the federal money laundering statutes, unlicensed money transmitter statutes and the Bank Secrecy Act. For example, under the Bank Secrecy Act, banks must report to the federal government any suspected illegal activity, which would include any transaction associated with a cannabis-related business. These reports must be filed even though the business is operating in compliance with applicable state and local laws. Therefore, financial institutions that conduct transactions with money generated by cannabis-related conduct could face criminal liability under the Bank Secrecy Act for, among other things, failing to identify or report financial transactions that involve the proceeds of cannabis-related violations of the CSA.

FinCen issued guidance in February 2014 which clarifies how financial institutions can provide services to cannabis-related businesses consistent with their obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act. Concurrently, with the FinCen guidance, the U.S. Department of Justice issued supplemental guidance directing federal prosecutors to consider the federal enforcement priorities enumerated in the Cole Memo with respect to federal money laundering, unlicensed money transmitter and Bank Secrecy Act offenses based on cannabis-related violations of the CSA. The FinCen guidance sets forth extensive requirements for financial institutions to meet if they want to offer bank accounts to cannabis-related businesses, including close monitoring of businesses to determine that they meet all of the requirements established by the U.S. Department of Justice, including those enumerated in the Cole Memo. This is a level of scrutiny that is far beyond what is expected of any normal banking relationship.

As a result, many banks are hesitant to offer any banking services to cannabis-related businesses, including opening bank accounts. While we currently have a bank account, our inability to maintain that account or the lack of access to bank accounts or other banking services in the future, would make it difficult for us to operate our business, increase our operating costs, and pose additional operational, logistical and security challenges. Similarly, if our proposed tenants are unable to access banking services, they will not be able to enter into triple-net leasing arrangements with us, as our leases will require rent payments to be made by check or wire transfer.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OUR MANAGEMENT

Our Executive Officers, Directors and Director Nominees

The following table sets forth certain information about our executive officers, directors and director nominees.

Name		Age		Position(s) with Our Company
Alan D. Gold		56		Executive Chairman
Paul E. Smithers		59		President, Chief Executive Officer and Director Nominee
Robert M. Sistek		40		Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Investments
Gregory J. Fahey		56		Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer
Brian J. Wolfe		40		Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Gary A. Kreitzer		61		Director
Gary M. Malino		58		Director Nominee
Scott Shoemaker		50		Director Nominee
David Stecher		55		Director Nominee

Alan D. Gold has served as executive chairman of our board of directors since our formation. Mr. Gold served as chairman, chief executive officer, and president of BioMed Realty (formerly NYSE: BMR), a REIT specializing in acquiring, leasing, developing and managing laboratory and office space for the life science industry, from its inception in 2004 through the sale of the company to affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII L.P. in January 2016. Mr. Gold also served as chairman, president and chief executive officer of BioMed Realty’s privately-held predecessor, Bernardo Property Advisors, Inc., from August 1998 until August 2004. In addition, Mr. Gold was a co-founder and served as president and a director of Alexandria Real Estate (NYSE: ARE), a NYSE-listed urban office REIT, from its predecessor’s inception in 1994 until August 1998. Mr. Gold served as managing partner of GoldStone Real Estate Finance and Investments, a partnership engaged in the real estate and mortgage business, from 1989 to 1994. He also served as assistant vice president of commercial real estate for Northland Financial Company, a full service commercial property mortgage banker, from 1989 to 1990 and as real estate investment officer of commercial real estate for John Burnham Company, a regional full service real estate company, from 1985 to 1989. From December 2013 to June 2016, Mr. Gold served on the board of directors and as a member of the nominating and compensation committees of CatchMark Timber Trust, Inc. (NYSE: CTT), a publicly traded REIT focused on timberland ownership. From August 2011 to March 2013, Mr. Gold also served on the board of directors and as a member of the audit committee of American Assets Trust, Inc. (NYSE: AAT), a publicly traded REIT focused on acquiring, developing and managing retail, office, multifamily and mixed-use properties. Mr. Gold currently serves as a member of the board of trustees for the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, a research organization dedicated to fundamental research in biology and its relation to health, and as a member of the board of directors of the Campanile Foundation, a philanthropic foundation that supports San Diego State University. Mr. Gold received his Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration and his Master of Business Administration from San Diego State University. We believe that Mr. Gold’s 30 years of experience in the real estate industry, expertise in NYSE-listed REITs, and extensive management experience make him qualified to serve as executive chairman of our board of directors.

Paul E. Smithers has served as our president and chief executive officer since our formation and is a director nominee. From August 2013 to July 2015, Paul Smithers served as co-founder and chief legal officer of Iso Nano International, LLC, a designer and manufacturer of advanced materials for use in the aerospace, consumer goods, electronics and safety industries. Prior to his time at Iso Nano, Mr. Smithers was the managing partner of Smithers & Player, Attorneys at Law from September 1989 to July 2013. Mr. Smithers is a member of the California Bar. We believe that Mr. Smithers’ management expertise and over 30 years of legal and regulatory experience are valuable to our board of directors.

Robert M. Sistek serves as our chief financial officer and executive vice president, investments. Prior to joining us, Mr. Sistek held the positions of senior vice president, investments from March 2015 through October 2016 and vice president, finance from May 2011 to March 2015 with BioMed Realty (formerly NYSE: BMR), a REIT specializing in acquiring, leasing, developing and managing laboratory and office space for the life science industry. Prior to BioMed Realty, Mr. Sistek was senior vice president of capital markets

TABLE OF CONTENTS

for CoreSite Realty Corporation (NYSE: COR), a publicly-traded REIT specializing in institutional quality data centers. Previously, he was a senior associate with The Carlyle Group, a predecessor company of CoreSite, from 2007 to 2010, vice president of finance and capital markets at DCT Industrial Trust (NYSE: DCT) from 2006 to 2007, and held senior positions with GMAC Commercial Mortgage and ProLogis, Inc. (NYSE: PLD) from 2001 to 2005. Mr. Sistek received his Master of Business Administration from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and his Bachelor of Science in Accounting, summa cum laude, from the University of Northern Colorado. He is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

Gregory J. Fahey serves as our chief accounting officer and treasurer. Mr. Fahey has over 28 years of experience in the real estate industry. Prior to joining us, Mr. Fahey served as the senior vice president, controller of Realty Income Corporation (NYSE: O), a NYSE-listed REIT, from January 2013 to June 2014. He joined Realty Income Corporation in 1986, serving in various positions until April 1998, when he began serving as the vice president, controller (a position he held until January 2013). As the controller, Mr. Fahey was the chief accounting officer of Realty Income Corporation and was responsible for the accounting and reporting functions of the company, including its SEC filings. He also worked on the each of the securities offerings of Realty Income Corporation. From June 2014 until joining us, Mr. Fahey was retired. Mr. Fahey is accredited as a certified management accountant.

Brian J. Wolfe serves as our vice president, general counsel and secretary. Until March 2016, Mr. Wolfe served as vice president, corporate legal and assistant secretary of BioMed Realty (formerly NYSE: BMR), a REIT specializing in acquiring, leasing, developing and managing laboratory and office space for the life science industry, having joined BioMed Realty in 2007. Prior to that, Mr. Wolfe was an attorney with Latham & Watkins LLP, where he represented public and private companies in a broad range of industries with a focus on corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions, securities law compliance and corporate governance. Mr. Wolfe received his Juris Doctor Degree with honors from the University of Virginia School of Law and his A.B. in Economics with honors from Harvard College. Mr. Wolfe is a member of the California State Bar and San Diego County Bar Association.

Gary A. Kreitzer has served as a member of our board of directors since our formation. Mr. Kreitzer is a co-founder of BioMed Realty (formerly NYSE: BMR), a REIT specializing in acquiring, leasing, developing and managing laboratory and office space for the life science industry, and served as its general counsel from the company’s formation in 2004 until August 2012. Mr. Kreitzer currently serves as BioMed Realty’s executive vice president, a position he has held since its formation in 2004. Mr. Kreitzer also served in the same roles with Bernardo Property Advisors from December 1998 to August 2004. Mr. Kreitzer was a co-founder and served as senior vice president and in-house counsel of Alexandria Real Estate (NYSE: ARE), a NYSE-listed urban office REIT, from its predecessor’s inception in 1994 until December 1998. From 1990 to 1994, Mr. Kreitzer was in-house counsel and vice president for Seawest Energy Corporation, an alternative energy facilities development company. Mr. Kreitzer also served The Christiana Companies, Inc., a publicly traded investment and real estate development company, in a number of roles from 1982 to 1989, including as in-house counsel, secretary and vice president. Mr. Kreitzer is a member of the California Bar. We believe that Mr. Kreitzer’s 30 years of experience in the real estate industry, expertise in NYSE-listed REITs, and legal expertise are valuable to our board of directors.

Gary M. Malino is one of our director nominees. Mr. Malino has been a member of the board of directors and the audit committee of PriceSmart, Inc. (NASDAQ: PSMT), a publicly traded company that operates membership warehouse clubs in Central America, South America and the Caribbean, since May of 2016. He is a retired senior executive of Realty Income Corporation (NYSE: O), a NYSE-listed REIT. Mr. Malino joined Realty Income Corporation in 1985 and was the chief financial officer of the company from 1994 until 2001, when he was promoted to president, chief operating officer, a position that he held until his retirement in December 2014. Prior to joining Realty Income, he was a certified public accountant for a Los Angeles based accounting firm and assistant controller with McMillin Development Company, a real estate development company. We believe that Mr. Malino’s extensive experience as an executive of a publicly traded company, his audit background as a certified public accountant, his knowledge of SEC filing requirements and his extensive experience with finance and compensation matters are valuable to our board of directors.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Scott Shoemaker, MD is one of our director nominees. Mr. Shoemaker is a practicing orthopedic surgeon specializing in pediatrics and trauma for Kaiser Permanente, an integrated managed care consortium, since 1999. He is also an inventor, assists in the development of medical devices and is on a patent for a spine deformity system developed by NuVasive, Inc. for which he receives royalties. Mr. Shoemaker is also a founder of BOSS Logic, LLC, a company designed to generate ideas for the intellectual property and biotechnology sectors. BOSS Logic, LLC holds multiple patents relating to how mobile devices share and distribute contact information. He is part owner and developer of Aztek Paddles, a carbon fiber company. In this role, he assisted in designing paddles, writing patents and testing paddles. We believe that Mr. Shoemaker’s management experience and medical expertise are valuable to our board of directors.

David Stecher is one of our director nominees. Mr. Stecher has led the executive benefits practice at both NFP Retirement and its sister company, Retirement Plan Advisory Group, since December of 2009. NFP Retirement and Retirement Plan Advisory Group are companies that specialize in corporate retirement plans. Previously, Mr. Stecher served, from April 2004 to September 2009, as executive vice president for Retirement Capital Group, a company that provides employee compensation and benefits advisory services; from January 1984 to September 1986, as tax and auditing accountant for KPMG Peat Marwick; and from June 1997 to April 2004, as executive vice president and head of West Coast operations for AXA Advisors’ executive benefits group, a group that designs and implements corporate executive benefits and provides individual planning for asset accumulation and preservation. Mr. Stecher holds a wide range of certifications, including, CPA, CFP, CLU, and ChFC, as well as his Series 6, 7, 63, 65 and 24 licenses. We believe that Mr. Stecher’s expertise in employee compensation and benefits as well as his accounting background and experience are valuable to our board of directors.

Additional Background of Our Executive Chairman

As noted above, Mr. Gold served as the chairman, chief executive officer and president of BioMed Realty from its inception and initial public offering in 2004 until its sale in January 2016. Investors who held BioMed Realty common stock from its initial public offering in 2004 until its sale in 2016 received a 163.6% total return on their investment, assuming the reinvestment of dividends into common stock. From and including BioMed Realty’s initial public offering in August 2004 through its sale in January 2016, BioMed Realty raised an aggregate of approximately $3.5 billion in gross proceeds from equity offerings through the issuance of approximately 182.5 million shares of common stock. BioMed Realty benefited from a generally healthy economy and favorable operating environment for life science real estate from 2004 to 2007. However, in the severe economic downturn from 2008 through 2010, BioMed Realty’s stock price experienced a significant correction. After 2010, the overall economy recovered gradually, and BioMed Realty’s stock price recovered gradually over time as well.

Set forth below is the annual return on investment of investors in BioMed Realty during Mr. Gold's tenure at the company. Except as otherwise indicated, annual return on investment of BioMed Realty for the years presented are calculated based on the increase or decrease in the closing price of BioMed Realty’s common stock on the NYSE on December 31 of the applicable year compared to December 31 of the prior year and takes into account the reinvestment of dividends paid in the applicable year into shares of common stock. The table below also provides a comparison of the stock performance of BioMed Realty against the MSCI US REIT Index and the S&P 500 during the same periods.

According to MSCI Inc., the MSCI US REIT Index represents approximately 85% of the publicly-traded U.S. REIT market with each REIT in the index having a market capitalization of at least $100 million, and is comprised of equity REIT securities that belong to the MSCI US Investable Market 2500 Index. The MSCI US REIT Index includes only REIT securities that are of reasonable size in terms of full and free float-adjusted market capitalization to ensure that the performance of the equity REIT universe can be captured and replicated in actual institutional and retail portfolios of different sizes. The REITs that are included in the MSCI US REIT Index reflect a broad spectrum of real estate sectors, including REITs that operate in the office, retail, hotel, multifamily, industrial, healthcare and storage sectors in one or more regions of the United States or across the entire United States. We believe that the MSCI US REIT Index is an industry benchmark used by investors for purposes of comparing stock performance and stockholder returns. However, comparison of BioMed Realty’s stock performance to the performance of the MSCI US REIT Index may be limited due to the differences between BioMed Realty and the other companies represented in the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MSCI US REIT Index, including with respect to size, asset type, geographic concentration and investment strategy. The information regarding total return to stockholders achieved by BioMed Realty is not a guarantee or prediction of the returns that we may achieve in the future, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to replicate these returns.

Total Return (1)		2004 (2)				2005				2006				2007				2008				2009				2010				2011				2012				2013				2014				2015				2016 (3)				Total Return (4)
BioMed Realty			40.9	%			15.3	%			22.1	%			(15.2	%)			(46.2	%)			46.6	%			22.3	%			1.1	%			11.8	%			(1.9	%)			26.5	%			15.3	%			0.5	%			163.6	%
MSCI US REIT			22.8	%			12.1	%			35.9	%			(16.8	%)			(38.0	%)			28.6	%			28.5	%			8.7	%			17.8	%			2.5	%			30.4	%			2.5	%			(4.6	%)			162.7	%
S&P 500			13.4	%			4.9	%			15.8	%			5.5	%			(37.0	%)			26.5	%			15.1	%			2.1	%			16.0	%			32.4	%			13.7	%			1.4	%			(7.8	%)			117.7	%

The table below sets forth BioMed Realty's net income, assets, liabilities, stock price and dividends per share from the company’s initial public offering in 2004 to January 2016. This information was obtained from BioMed Realty’s public filings with the SEC. We have not independently verified the accuracy of such data.

Financial Metric		2004 (1)				2005				2006				2007				2008				2009				2010				2011				2012				2013				2014 (2)				2015 (3)				2016 (3) (4)
Total Revenues		$	29			$	139			$	219			$	266			$	302			$	361			$	386			$	440			$	518			$	637			$	675				N/A				N/A
Net Income			5				17				35				56				48				42				22				26				(3	)			38				194				N/A				N/A
Assets			582				1,337				2,693				3,057				3,227				3,283				3,960				4,429				4,834				5,973				6,171				N/A				N/A
Liabilities			138				586				1,459				1,653				1,598				1,459				1,647				1,816				2,350				2,986				3,101				N/A				N/A
High Stock Price		$	22.95			$	26.06			$	32.41			$	31.20			$	29.50			$	16.59			$	19.50			$	21.03			$	20.30			$	23.13			$	22.62			$	25.11			$	23.82
Low Stock Price		$	15.75			$	19.39			$	23.75			$	20.89			$	5.88			$	6.02			$	13.36			$	14.94			$	17.52			$	17.90			$	17.98			$	17.94			$	23.56
End of Year Stock Price		$	22.21			$	24.40			$	28.60			$	23.17			$	11.72			$	15.78			$	18.65			$	18.08			$	19.33			$	18.12			$	21.54			$	23.69			$	23.81
Dividends Declared Per Share		$	0.42			$	1.08			$	1.16			$	1.24			$	1.34			$	0.70			$	0.63			$	0.80			$	0.88			$	0.96			$	1.01			$	0.78				—
Dividends Paid Per Share (5)		$	0.283673			$	1.010305			$	1.075722			$	1.220000			$	1.315000			$	0.890000			$	0.600000			$	0.770000			$	0.845000			$	0.940000			$	1.300000			$	1.040000			$	—

Note: dollars in millions, except per share data.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Tax Treatment		2004				2005				2006				2007				2008				2009				2010				2011				2012				2013				2014				2015				2016
Taxable Ordinary Dividend		$	0.283673			$	1.010305			$	1.064520			$	0.982341				1.083176			$	0.449560			$	0.387974			$	0.440921			$	0.626330			$	0.940000			$	0.502580			$	0.019032			$	—
Return of Capital			—				—				0.011202				0.220871				0.231824				0.440440				0.212026				0.329079				0.218670				—				—				—				—
Long-Term Capital Gain			—				—				—				0.016788				—				—				—				—				—				—				0.797420				0.337584				—
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain			—				—				—				0.009224				—				—				—				—				—				—				0.218513				—				—
Non-Dividend Distributions			—				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				0.683384				—

According to BioMed Realty’s public filings with the SEC, at the time of BioMed Realty’s sale in January 2016, BioMed Realty owned 129 properties located in Massachusetts, California, United Kingdom (Cambridge), New York, New Jersey, Maryland, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Washington and near certain universities and their related medical systems comprising 196 buildings, approximately 18.9 million rentable square feet of space, and land supporting future development of an estimated additional 6.4 million rentable square feet. In addition, according to BioMed Realty’s public filings with the SEC, from January 1, 2013 through its sale in January 2016, BioMed Realty sold five properties as follows:

Property Type

State

Closing Date

Rentable Square Feet

Gross Proceeds

Gain/(Loss) on Sale (1)

Life Science Laboratory and Office Facility

Pennsylvania

May 29, 2015

547,000

$

35.2 million

($32.3) million

Life Science Laboratory and Office Facility

Maryland

September 24, 2015

42,900

$

7.9 million

$1.9 million

Life Science Manufacturing Facility

Maryland

December 9, 2014

289,912

$

322.5 million

$136.6 million

Life Science Laboratory and Office Facility

New Hampshire

July 31, 2013

21,500

$

5.9 million

Not available (2)

Life Science Laboratory and Office Facility

Pennsylvania

September 4, 2013

27,750

$

2.1 million

Not available

(2)

Our Board of Directors and Board Committees

Upon completion of this offering, we expect our board of directors will consist of six directors, including our existing directors Messrs. Gold and Kreitzer. Of the six directors, we expect that our board of directors will determine that a majority of our directors are independent in accordance with the independence standards of the NYSE. NYSE rules require that we have a majority of independent directors within one year of listing our Class A common stock on the NYSE. Upon the expiration of their terms at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2017, the directors will be elected to serve one-year terms. Our bylaws provide that a majority of the entire board of directors may establish, increase or decrease the number of directors, provided that the number of directors shall never be less than one, which is the minimum number required by the MGCL, nor more than 15. All of our executive officers will serve at the discretion of our board of directors.

Our board of directors will form an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee upon completion of this offering. The principal functions of each committee are briefly described below. Matters put to a vote of any one of our three committees must be approved by a majority of the directors on the committee who are present at a meeting, in person or as otherwise permitted by our bylaws, at which there is a quorum or by unanimous written consent of the directors on that committee.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Audit Committee

The audit committee will be composed of Messrs. Malino, Shoemaker and Stecher, each of whom will be an independent director for purpose of service on the audit committee and “financially literate” under the rules of the NYSE. Mr. Malino will serve as chair of the audit committee and as the “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined by the SEC. The audit committee assists the board of directors in overseeing:

The audit committee is also responsible for engaging an independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm and the related audit and non-audit fees.

Compensation Committee

The compensation committee will be composed of Messrs. Malino, Shoemaker and Stecher, each of whom will be an independent director under the rules of the NYSE. Mr. Stecher will serve as chair of the compensation committee, whose principal functions will be to:

The compensation committee is primarily responsible for establishing and implementing our compensation program and policies. To fulfill its responsibilities, the compensation committee may engage, oversee and provide appropriate funding for advisors and consultants to advise the committee on executive compensation matters.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The nominating and corporate governance committee will be composed of Messrs. Malino, Shoemaker and Stecher, each of whom will be an independent director under the rules of the NYSE. Mr. Shoemaker will serve as chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee, which is responsible for:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our board of directors will establish corporate governance guidelines and a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our employees, officers and directors. Among other matters, our code of business conduct and ethics is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

Any waiver of the code of business conduct and ethics for our executive officers or directors may be made only by the audit committee and for those who are not our executive officers, by our chief executive officer and our general counsel, and will be promptly disclosed as required by law or stock exchange regulations.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Our board of directors does not have a policy on whether the same person should serve as both the chief executive officer and chairman of the board of directors or, if the roles are separate, whether the chairman should be selected from the independent directors. Our board understands that there is no single, generally accepted approach to providing board leadership and believes that it should have the flexibility to periodically determine the leadership structure that is best for our company. Consistent with this understanding, our independent directors will consider the board’s leadership structure on an annual basis.

The board of directors believes that its current leadership structure, with Mr. Gold serving as executive chairman and Mr. Smithers serving as president, chief executive officer and director, is appropriate. Mr. Gold will be involved in both our day-to-day operations and the strategic decision making at the board level. We believe our current leadership structure is the optimal structure for us because it provides our company with strong, effective and consistent leadership.

Our board of directors will play an active role in overseeing the management of our risks. Upon completion of this offering, the committees of our board of directors will assist our full board in risk oversight by addressing specific matters within the purview of each committee. The audit committee will focus on oversight of financial risks; the compensation committee will focus primarily on risks relating to executive compensation plans and arrangements; and the nominating and corporate governance committee will focus on reputational and corporate governance risks, including the independence of our board of directors. While each committee will be responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, our full board of directors plans to keep itself regularly informed regarding such risks through committee reports and otherwise.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

retainer of $80,000 in cash) and an annual retainer of $40,000 payable in restricted shares of common stock under the Incentive Plan, which will vest ratably over a three-year period. In addition, we anticipate that the audit committee chair will receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000 in cash and any other committee chair will receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000 in cash. We may decrease such amounts in an effort to reduce our overall general and administrative expenses. All members of our board of directors will be reimbursed for their costs and expenses in attending our board meetings. Any member of our board of directors who is also an employee of our company will not receive additional compensation for serving as a director. As one of our founders, Mr. Kreitzer was granted 25,000 shares of our Class B common stock pursuant to a restricted stock purchase agreement. The grant date fair value of these shares issued on June 15, 2016, the date of our incorporation, including the impact of subsequent modifications, in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, was $182,384. Each of our founders has entered into a redemption agreement with us pursuant to which such shares of Class B common stock will be redeemed by us for $0.001 per share and cancelled immediately before the closing of this offering. See the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Restricted Stock Grants to Founders, Executive Officers and Directors.”

Compensation of Executive Officers

Our policies with respect to the compensation of our executive officers upon completion of this offering will be administered by our board in consultation with the compensation committee (as described above) and in accordance with the applicable listing standards of the NYSE. The compensation policies followed by us will be intended to provide for compensation that is sufficient to attract, motivate and retain executives of outstanding ability and potential and to establish an appropriate relationship between executive compensation and the creation of stockholder value.

It is anticipated that performance and equity-based compensation will be an important foundation in executive compensation packages as we believe it is important to maintain a strong link between executive incentives and the creation of stockholder value. We believe that performance and equity-based compensation can be an important component of the total executive compensation package for maximizing stockholder value while, at the same time, attracting, motivating and retaining high-quality executives.

Upon completion of this offering, we expect to enter into severance and change in control agreements with our executive officers, subject to approval of the compensation committee of our board of directors. See the section entitled “— Severance and Change in Control Agreements” below.

Overview of Compensation

As explained below, upon consummation of the offering, our compensation committee will seek to provide total compensation packages that are competitive in terms of potential value to our executives, and which are tailored to our unique characteristics and needs within our industry in order to create an executive compensation program that will adequately reward our executives for their roles in creating value for our stockholders. We intend to be competitive with other similarly situated companies in the REIT industry following completion of the offering. Our total compensation packages will likely include an annual bonus opportunity, equity awards and other compensation such as participation in various employee benefit plans. Set forth below is the initial annual cash compensation that we expect to pay and equity awards that we have granted or expect to grant to our executive officers after closing of this offering (including the grant date fair value of shares of Class B common stock that will be redeemed immediately before the closing of this offering):

Name and principal position		Base Salary (1)				Bonus				Stock Award				Option Awards				Non-Equity Inventive Plan Compensation				Total
Alan D. Gold Executive Chairman		$	600,000				—			$	2,502,780	(3)			—				—			$	3,102,780
Paul E. Smithers President and Chief Executive Officer		$	350,000				—			$	656,582	(3)			—				—			$	1,006,582
Robert M. Sistek Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Investments		$	275,000				—			$	275,000	(2)			—				—			$	550,000

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Name and principal position		Base Salary (1)				Bonus				Stock Award				Option Awards				Non-Equity Inventive Plan Compensation				Total
Gregory J. Fahey Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer		$	180,000				—			$	182,384	(3)			—				—			$	362,384
Brian J. Wolfe Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary		$	200,000				—			$	275,000	(2)			—				—			$	475,000

Upon consummation of the offering, we will seek to provide total compensation packages that are competitive in terms of potential value to our executives, and which are tailored to our unique characteristics and needs within our industry in order to create an executive compensation program that will adequately reward our executives for their roles in creating value for our stockholders. We intend to be competitive with other similarly situated companies in the REIT industry following completion of the offering.

The compensation decisions regarding our executives will be based on our need to attract individuals with the skills necessary for us to achieve our business plan, to reward those individuals fairly over time, and to retain those individuals who continue to perform at or above our expectations.

It is anticipated that our executive compensation program will have three primary components — salary, cash incentive bonus and stock-based awards. We will view the three components of executive compensation as related but distinct. Although the compensation committee will review total compensation, we do not believe that significant compensation derived from one component of compensation should negate or reduce compensation from other components. We anticipate determining the appropriate level for each compensation component based in part, but not exclusively, on our view of internal equity and consistency, individual performance and other information deemed relevant and timely. Since the compensation committee will not be formed until the consummation of this offering, we have not adopted any formal or informal policies or guidelines for allocating compensation between annual and long-term compensation, between cash and non-cash compensation, or among different forms of compensation.

In addition to the guidance provided by the compensation committee, we may utilize the services of third parties from time to time in connection with the hiring and compensation awarded to executive employees. This could include subscriptions to executive compensation surveys and other databases.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The compensation committee will be charged with performing an annual review of our executive compensation program, including its cash and equity compensation components, to confirm it provides adequate incentives and motivation to executive officers, encourages and maintains a performance-driven company culture, aligns the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders and adequately compensates our executive officers relative to comparable officers in other companies.

Benchmarking of Cash and Equity Compensation

We believe it is important when making compensation-related decisions to be informed as to current practices of similarly situated publicly-held companies in the REIT industry. We expect that the compensation committee will stay apprised of the cash and equity compensation practices of publicly-held companies in the REIT industry through the review of such companies’ public reports and through other resources. It is expected that any companies chosen for inclusion in any benchmarking group would have business characteristics comparable to us, which characteristics may include investment strategies, financial growth metrics, stage of development, employee headcount and market capitalization. While benchmarking may not always be appropriate as a stand-alone tool for setting compensation due to the aspects of our business objectives that may be unique to us, we generally believe that gathering this information will be an important part of our compensation-related decision-making process.

Compensation Components

Base Salary .  Generally, we, working with the compensation committee, anticipate setting executive base salaries at levels comparable with those of executives in similar positions and with similar responsibilities at comparably sized companies. We will seek to maintain base salary amounts at or near the REIT industry norms, while avoiding paying amounts in excess of what we believe is necessary to motivate executives to meet corporate goals. It is anticipated base salaries will generally be reviewed annually, subject to terms of employment agreements, if any, and that the compensation committee and board will seek to adjust base salary amounts to realign such salaries with REIT industry norms after taking into account individual responsibilities, performance and experience. As described above, we have been accruing base salaries for each of executive officers at the salaries mentioned above from the date of their commencement of employment with us for their services rendered to us in connection with this offering and expect to pay such salaries in arrears upon completion of this offering. Although we expect such salaries to remain the same upon the completion of this offering, the compensation committee may increase or decrease such amounts as part of the compensation packages developed for each of our executive officers.

Annual Bonuses .  We intend to utilize cash incentive bonuses for executives to focus them on achieving key operational and financial objectives within a yearly time horizon. Near the beginning of each year, the board, upon the recommendation of the compensation committee and subject to any applicable employment agreements, will determine performance parameters for appropriate executives. At the end of each year, the board of directors and compensation committee will determine the level of achievement for each corporate goal.

Since we will elect to qualify as a REIT under the Code, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax. Thus, the deduction limit contained in Section 162(m) of the Code for compensation paid to chief executive officers and certain other executive officers of public companies will not be material to the design and structure of our executive compensation program.

Equity Awards .  We also expect to use restricted stock or restricted stock units and other stock-based awards to reward long-term performance. We believe that providing a meaningful portion of our executives’ total compensation package in restricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards will align the incentives of our executives with the interests of our stockholders and with our long-term success. The compensation committee and board will develop their equity award determinations based on their judgments as to whether the complete compensation packages provided to our executives are sufficient to retain, motivate and adequately award the executives.

Equity awards will be granted through the Incentive Plan, which was adopted by our board and stockholders in June 2016. We expect that at the first meeting of the compensation committee of our board of directors after completion of this offering, two executive officers, Messrs. Sistek and Wolfe, will each receive $275,000 in shares of Class A common stock under the Incentive Plan based on the public offering price, or

TABLE OF CONTENTS

13,750 shares of Class A common stock at the assumed offering price of $20.00 per share, which shares are expected to vest in their entirety 180 days after the completion of this offering.

We will account for any equity compensation expense under the rules of FASB Accounting Standards Codification 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation , which requires a company to estimate and record an expense for each award of equity compensation over the service period of the award. Accounting rules also will require us to record cash compensation as an expense at the time the obligation is accrued.

Other Compensation .  We will establish and maintain various employee benefit plans, including medical, dental, life insurance and 401(k) plans. These plans will be available to all salaried employees and will not discriminate in favor of executive officers. We may extend other perquisites to our executives that are not available to our employees generally.

Severance and Change in Control Agreements

We consider the maintenance of a sound management team to be essential to protecting and enhancing our best interests. To that end, we recognize that the uncertainty that may exist among management with respect to their “at-will” employment with us that may result in the departure or distraction of management personnel to our detriment. Accordingly, we have determined that severance arrangements are appropriate to encourage the continued attention and dedication of certain members of our management and to allow them to focus on the value to stockholders without concern for the impact on their continued employment.

Subject to the approval of the compensation committee of our board of directors after the completion of this offering, we expect to enter into severance and change in control agreements with each of Messrs. Gold, Smithers, Sistek, Fahey and Wolfe having the terms and conditions described herein. These agreements will expire on December 31, 2019, but will automatically renew for successive three-year terms unless either party gives written notice of non-renewal within 90 days before the end of the current term. We believe these agreements are important for retention purposes, as many companies with which we will compete with in the REIT industry offer severance compensation, particularly in connection with a change in control. Accordingly, our executive officers will have the right to receive severance compensation if they are terminated without cause or they leave for good reason while the agreement is in effect. If such termination occurs within two years after a change in control, enhanced severance compensation, consisting of the vesting of unvested equity awards, is provided. We believe that such compensation gives our named executive officers incentive (1) to stay with us despite the possibility of losing employment after a change in control and (2) to focus on obtaining the best possible value for stockholders in a change in control transaction.

The agreements will provide that if we terminate the executive without cause or the executive terminates his employment for good reason, in either case other than in connection with a change in control, the executive officer will receive a cash payment equal to a specified multiple (set forth below) of the sum of his annual base salary, his average annual cash bonus during the past three years, and the annual Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act, or COBRA, premiums the executive would be required to pay to continue health plan coverage under our health plans. Generally, we will pay this amount in a lump sum within 60 days after the executive’s separation from service, subject to potential deferral required by Section 409A of the Code. In the event of a termination without cause or the executive officer leaves for good reason that is not related to a change in control, the executive officer’s unvested options and stock rights awards that vest solely on the basis of time will vest on a pro-rated basis and the executive officer’s performance shares will be earned on a pro-rated basis based on the level of achievement as of such date of termination.

In the event of a change in control and termination of the executive by us without cause or by the executive for good reason within two years after the change in control, in addition to the compensation set forth above, all unvested stock rights awards will vest immediately. Unearned performance shares also will vest at the greater of actual performance or target. If payments we make in connection with a change in control would be subject to the excise tax on “excess parachute payments” as defined and imposed under Section 4999 of the Code, then the payments will be delivered either (1) in full or (2) in an amount such that the value of the aggregate payments is $1.00 less than the maximum amount that the executive may receive without being subject to the excise tax, whichever of (1) or (2) results in the receipt by the executive of the greatest benefit on an after-tax basis.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The severance and change in control agreements will require each executive officer to sign a general release of claims against us as a condition of receiving the severance payment. For one year after termination of employment for any reason, the executive is prohibited from directly or indirectly soliciting (1) any of our employees to leave us or (2) any prospective employees negotiating with us on the date of termination to cease negotiations.

The agreements will also require the executive to provide consulting services to us for up to 20 hours a month during the six months after any termination of employment and requires the executive to maintain the confidentiality of our confidential information. The agreements will not contain any provision for waiving a breach of the non-solicitation, confidentiality or consulting obligations described above.

The severance amounts payable above to each executive officer will be a specified multiple of the sum of the officer’s annual base salary and average annual cash bonus paid during the past three years. With respect to qualifying terminations occurring either prior to a change in control or after a change of control, the severance multiple will be 3.0 for each of Messrs. Gold and Smithers, and 2.0 for each of Messrs. Sistek, Fahey and Wolfe.

In lieu of allowing executives to continue participating in our health plans during the severance period, we would pay an additional cash severance payment upon the executive’s qualifying termination in an amount equal to the COBRA premiums the executive would be required to pay to continue his or her health plan coverage during such severance period.

If the executive retires for other than good reason and gives us a specified advance notice before retiring, or if the executive dies or terminates employment because of disability, all unvested stock rights awards that vest based on continued employment will vest immediately on the date of such retirement or termination. The executive will remain eligible to receive performance shares awarded under our equity incentive plans before his or her termination if we achieve the stated performance goals during the remainder of the performance period, as if the executive’s employment had not terminated. To qualify for these benefits on retirement, the executive must retire after a specified age or with a combination of age plus years of service, depending on the benefit in question, as well as give us the required number of years of advance notice of retirement.

The agreements will also provide that severance payments are subject to recoupment as required by any recoupment policy approved by our board of directors.

The definition of “cause” under the agreements will include:

The definition of “good reason” will track the definition in regulations under Section 409A of the Code and include the following, if the executive has given written notice of the condition within 90 days of its occurrence and the condition remains in effect for 30 days after the notice:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The definition of “change in control” will track the definition in regulations under Section 409A of the Code and includes:

Compensation Policies and Practices and Risk Management

When establishing and reviewing our compensation philosophy and programs, we will consider whether such programs align the interests of our directors and officers with our interests and those of our stockholders and whether such programs encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking. We believe our compensation philosophy and programs will encourage our executives to strive to achieve both short- and long-term goals that are important to our success and building stockholder value, without promoting unnecessary or excessive risk taking. We will review our compensation policies and practices periodically to determine whether such policies and practices are appropriate in light of our risk management objectives.

2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan

In June 2016, our board of directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, the Incentive Plan.

A total of 1,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock is reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan. As of the date of this prospectus, no awards have been made under the Incentive Plan.

After completion of this offering at the first meeting of the compensation committee of our board of directors, it is expected that Messrs. Sistek and Wolfe will each receive $275,000 in shares of Class A common stock under the Incentive Plan based on the public offering price (representing 13,750 shares of Class A common stock each at the assumed offering price of $20.00), which shares are expected to vest in their entirety 180 days after completion of this offering. The Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance units, restricted stock, restricted stock units, shares of our Class A common stock, dividend equivalent units, incentive cash awards or other awards based on our Class A common stock. Awards may be granted alone or in addition to, in tandem with, or (subject to the Incentive Plan’s prohibitions on repricing) in substitution for any other award (or any other award granted under another plan of ours or of any of our affiliates).

Purpose.   The two complementary purposes of the Incentive Plan are to help us attract, retain, focus and motivate our executives and other key employees, directors, consultants and advisors and to increase stockholder value. The Incentive Plan will accomplish these purposes by offering participants the opportunity to acquire shares of our Class A common stock, receive monetary payments based on the value of such Class A common stock or receive other incentive compensation on the potentially favorable terms that the Incentive Plan provides. Under the rules of the NYSE, we are required to have a compensation committee comprised entirely of independent directors who are responsible for determining the compensation of our chief executive officer and recommending the compensation of our other executive officers (including any incentive or equity based compensation) to our board of directors for approval.

Administration.   The Incentive Plan will be administered by the compensation committee, our board of directors or another committee (we refer to the applicable committee or our board of directors, as the case may be, as the administrator). The administrator may designate any of the following as a participant under the Incentive Plan to the extent consistent with its authority: any officer or other employee of our company or its

TABLE OF CONTENTS

affiliates; any individual whom we or an affiliate have engaged to become an officer or employee; any consultant or advisor who provides services to our company or its affiliates; or any director, including a non-employee director.

The administrator has full discretionary authority to administer the Incentive Plan, including but not limited to the authority to: (i) interpret the provisions of the Incentive Plan; (ii) prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Incentive Plan; (iii) correct any defect, supply any omission, or reconcile any inconsistency in the Incentive Plan, any award or any award agreement in the manner and to the extent it deems desirable to carry the Incentive Plan or such award into effect; and (iv) make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Incentive Plan. All administrator determinations will be made in the sole discretion of the administrator and are final and binding on all interested parties.

Our board of directors may delegate some or all of its authority under the Incentive Plan to a committee of the board, and the compensation committee may delegate some or all of its authority under the Incentive Plan to a sub-committee or one or more of our officers, subject in each case to limitations specified in the Incentive Plan.

Number and sources of shares.   An aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of Class A common stock have been reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan, all of which may be issued upon the exercise of incentive stock options. The shares reserved for issuance may be either authorized and unissued shares or shares held as treasury stock. The number of shares reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan is reduced by the maximum number of shares, if any, that may be payable under an award as determined on the date of the grant of the award.

If (i) an award granted under the Incentive Plan lapses, expires, terminates or is cancelled without the issuance of shares under the award (whether due currently or on a deferred basis); (ii) it is determined during or at the conclusion of the term of an award granted under the Incentive Plan that all or some portion of the shares with respect to which the award was granted will not be issuable, or that other compensation with respect to shares covered by the award will not be payable on the basis that the conditions for such issuance will not be satisfied; (iii) shares are forfeited under an award; (iv) shares are issued under any award and we reacquire them pursuant to rights we reserved upon the issuance of the shares; or (v) shares are tendered to satisfy the exercise price of an award or federal, state or local tax withholding obligations, then such shares will be recredited to the Incentive Plan’s reserve and may again be used for new awards under the Incentive Plan. However, shares recredited to the Incentive Plan’s reserve under clause (iv) or (v) may not be issued pursuant to incentive stock options.

Eligibility.   Incentive stock options may only be granted to our and our subsidiaries’ employees. All other awards may be granted to our and our subsidiaries’ employees, officers, directors and key persons (including consultants and prospective employees).

Amendment or termination of the Incentive Plan.   The Incentive Plan terminates when all shares reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan have been issued, subject to our board of directors’ right to terminate the Incentive Plan at any time. In addition, our board of directors or the administrator may amend the Incentive Plan at any time, except:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The administrator generally may modify, amend or cancel any award or waive any restrictions or conditions applicable to any award or the exercise of the award. Any modification or amendment that materially diminishes the rights of the participant or any other person who may have an interest in the award, or that cancels any award, will be effective only if agreed to by that participant or other person. The administrator does not need to obtain participant or other interested party consent, however, for the adjustment or cancellation of an award pursuant to the adjustment provisions of the Incentive Plan or the modification of an award to the extent deemed necessary to comply with any applicable law or the listing requirements of any principal securities exchange or market on which the Class A common stock is then traded, to the extent the administrator deems necessary to preserve favorable accounting or tax treatment of any award for our company, or to the extent the administrator determines that the action does not materially and adversely affect the value of an award or that such action is in the best interest of the affected participant or any other person(s) with an interest in the award.

The authority of the administrator to terminate or modify the Incentive Plan or awards will extend beyond the termination date of the Incentive Plan. In addition, termination of the Incentive Plan will not affect the rights of participants with respect to awards previously granted to them, and all unexpired awards will continue in force after termination of the Incentive Plan except as they may lapse or be terminated by their own terms and conditions.

Options and stock appreciation rights.   Under the Incentive Plan, the administrator has the authority to grant stock options and to determine all terms and conditions of each stock option including but not limited to whether the option is an “incentive stock option” which meets the requirements of Section 422 of the Code, or a “nonqualified stock option” which does not meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Code. A stock option gives the participant the right to purchase shares of our Class A common stock at a fixed price, called the “option price,” after the vesting conditions of the option are met and prior to the date the option expires or terminates. The administrator fixes the option price per share of Class A common stock, which may not be less than the fair market value of the Class A common stock on the date of grant. The administrator determines the expiration date of each option, but the expiration date cannot be later than 10 years after the grant date. Options are exercisable at such times and are subject to such restrictions and conditions as the administrator deems necessary or advisable. The stock option exercise price is payable to us in full upon exercise.

Pursuant to the Incentive Plan, the administrator has the authority to grant stock appreciation rights. A stock appreciation right is the right of a participant to receive cash in an amount, and/or Class A common stock with a fair market value, equal to the appreciation of the fair market value of a share of Class A common stock during a specified period of time. The Incentive Plan provides that the administrator determines all terms and conditions of each stock appreciation right, including, among other things: whether the stock appreciation right is granted independently of a stock option or relates to a stock option; a grant price that is not less than the fair market value of the Class A common stock subject to the stock appreciation right on the date of grant; a term that must be no later than 10 years after the date of grant; and whether the stock appreciation right will settle in cash, Class A common stock or a combination of the two.

The specific terms and conditions of a participant’s option or stock appreciation right will be set forth in an award agreement delivered to the participant.

Repricing prohibited.   Neither the administrator nor any other person may amend the terms of outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights to reduce the exercise or grant price of such outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights; cancel outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights in exchange for stock options or stock appreciation rights with an exercise or grant price that is less than the exercise or grant price of the original options or stock appreciation rights; or cancel outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights with an exercise or grant price above the current fair market value of a share of Class A common stock in exchange for cash or other securities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Backdating prohibited.   The administrator may not grant a stock option or stock appreciation right with a grant date that is effective prior to the date the administrator takes action to approve such award.

Performance and stock awards.   Pursuant to the Incentive Plan, the administrator has the authority to grant awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares or performance units. Restricted stock means shares of Class A common stock that are subject to a risk of forfeiture, restrictions on transfer or both a risk of forfeiture and restrictions on transfer. Restricted stock unit means the right to receive a payment equal to the fair market value of one share of Class A common stock. Performance shares means the right to receive shares of Class A common stock to the extent performance goals are achieved. Performance unit means the right to receive a payment valued in relation to a unit that has a designated dollar value or the value of which is equal to the fair market value of one or more shares of Class A common stock, to the extent performance goals are achieved.

The administrator determines all terms and conditions of these types of awards, including, among other things: whether performance goals need to be achieved for the participant to realize any portion of the benefit provided under the award; whether the restrictions imposed on restricted stock or restricted stock units will lapse, and any portion of the performance goals subject to an award will be deemed achieved, upon a participant’s death, disability or retirement; the length of the vesting and/or performance period and, if different, the date on which payment of the benefit provided under the award is made; with respect to performance units, whether to measure the value of each unit in relation to a designated dollar value or the fair market value of one or more shares of Class A common stock; and, with respect to restricted stock units and performance units, whether the awards settle in cash, in shares of Class A common stock, or in a combination of the two.

The specific terms and conditions of a participant’s award of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares or performance units will be set forth in an award agreement delivered to the participant.

Dividend equivalent rights.   Pursuant to the Incentive Plan, the administrator has the authority to grant dividend equivalent units in connection with awards other than options, stock appreciation rights or other stock rights within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code. A dividend equivalent unit is the right to receive a payment, in cash or shares of Class A common stock, equal to the cash dividends or other distributions that we pay with respect to a share of Class A common stock. No dividend equivalent unit granted in tandem with another award may include vesting provisions more favorable to the participant than the vesting provisions, if any, to which the tandem award is subject.

The specific terms and conditions of a participant’s dividend equivalent units will be set forth in an award agreement delivered to the participant.

Incentive awards.   The administrator has the authority to grant annual and long-term incentive awards. An incentive award is the right to receive a cash payment to the extent performance goals are achieved. The administrator will determine all of the terms and conditions of each incentive award, including the performance goals, the performance period, the potential amount payable and the timing of payment, provided that the administrator must require that payment of all or any portion of the amount subject to the award is contingent on the achievement of one or more performance goals during the period the administrator specifies, although the administrator may specify that all or a portion of the goals are deemed achieved upon a participant’s death, disability or (for awards not intended to qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code) retirement, or such other circumstances as the administrator may specify. For long-term incentive awards, the performance period must relate to a period of more than one fiscal year.

The specific terms and conditions of a participant’s incentive award will be set forth in an award agreement or another document delivered to the participant.

Other stock-based awards.   The administrator has the authority to grant other types of awards, which may be denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, shares of Class A common stock, either alone or in addition to or in conjunction with other awards, and payable in shares of Class A common stock or cash. Such awards may include shares of unrestricted Class A common stock, which may be awarded, without limitation (except as provided in the Incentive Plan), as a bonus, in

TABLE OF CONTENTS

payment of director fees, in lieu of cash compensation, in exchange for cancellation of a compensation right, or upon the attainment of performance goals or otherwise, or rights to acquire shares of our Class A common stock from us. The administrator determines all terms and conditions of the award, including the time or times at which such award is made and the number of shares of Class A common stock to be granted pursuant to such award or to which such award relates. Any award that provides for purchase rights must be priced at 100% of the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the date of the award.

The specific terms and conditions of a participant’s award will be set forth in an award agreement or another document delivered to the participant.

Per participant award limits.   Subject to the adjustment provisions of the Incentive Plan, no participant may be granted awards that could result in such participant:

Performance goals.   Awards may be made contingent on the achievement of performance goals. Performance goals include any goals the administrator establishes that relate to one or more of the following with respect to us or any one or more of our subsidiaries, affiliates or other business units: funds from operations; adjusted funds from operations, earnings before any one or more of the following: interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and/or stock compensation; operating (or gross) income or profit; pretax income before allocation of corporate overhead and/or bonus; operating efficiencies; operating income as a percentage of net revenue; return on equity, assets, capital, capital employed or investment; after tax operating income; net income; earnings or book value per share; financial ratios; cash flow(s); total rental income or revenues; capital expenditures as a percentage of rental income; total operating expenses, or some component or combination of components of total operating expenses, as a percentage of rental income; stock price or total stockholder return, including any comparisons with stock market indices; appreciation in or maintenance of the price of the Class A common stock or any of our publicly-traded securities; dividends; debt or cost reduction; comparisons with performance metrics of peer companies; comparisons of our stock price performance to the stock price performance of peer companies; strategic business objectives, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified cost, acquisition or leasing targets, meeting or reducing budgeted expenditures, attaining division, group or corporate financial goals, meeting business expansion goals and meeting goals relating to leasing, acquisitions, joint ventures or collaborations or dispositions; economic value-added models; or any combination of any of the foregoing. In addition, in the case of awards that the administrator determines at the date of grant will not be considered “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, the administrator may establish other performance goals.

Effect of a change in control.   If we experience a “change in control,” as defined in the Incentive Plan, then, unless otherwise expressly provided in an award agreement or another contract, or under the terms of a transaction constituting a change in control, the administrator may, in its discretion, provide that:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In general, if any payments or benefits paid by us under the Incentive Plan would cause payments made to or benefits received by a participant in connection with a change in control to be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code on excess parachute payments, then the payments will be delivered either (i) in full or (ii) in an amount such that the value of the aggregate payments is $1.00 less than the maximum amount that the participant may receive without being subject to the excise tax, whichever of (i) or (ii) results in the receipt by the participant of the greatest benefit on an after-tax basis.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table provides information, upon completion of this offering, regarding the number and percentage of shares of our Class A common stock beneficially owned by each executive officer, director and director nominee, each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of Class A common stock and all executive officers, directors and director nominees as a group. In accordance with SEC rules, each listed person’s beneficial ownership includes all shares of Class A common stock the person actually owns beneficially or of record, all shares of Class A common stock over which the person has or shares voting or dispositive control (such as in the capacity as a general partner of an investment fund), and all shares the person has the right to acquire within 60 days (such as shares of restricted common stock which are scheduled to vest within 60 days or upon the exercise of warrants or options). Except as otherwise provided, all shares are owned directly, and the indicated person has sole voting and investing power. The business address of the stockholders listed below is the address of our principal executive office.

We currently have outstanding 508,065 shares of Class B common stock, which are owned by our founders, including certain executive officers and directors. Immediately before the closing of this offering, we will redeem all 508,065 shares of Class B common stock for $0.001 per share. No shares of Class A common stock are currently outstanding.

		Immediately After this Offering
Beneficial Owner		Number of Shares Owned				Percentage of Outstanding Common Stock (1)
Alan D. Gold			150,000	(2)			3.0	%
Paul E. Smithers			—				—
Robert M. Sistek			—	(3)			—
Gregory J. Fahey			—				—
Brian J. Wolfe			—	(3)			—
Gary A. Kreitzer			—				—
Gary M. Malino			—				—
Scott Shoemaker			—				—
David Stecher			—				—
All executive officers, directors and director nominees as a group			150,000	(2)			3.0	%

*

Less than 1.0%.

(1)

Based on 5,000,000 shares of Class A common stock to be outstanding upon completion of this offering.

(2)

Consists of 150,000 shares of Class A common stock that Mr. Gold may purchase in this offering at the public offering price.

(3)

A grant of 13,750 shares of Class A common stock to each of Messrs. Sistek and Wolfe is expected to be approved at the first meeting of the compensation committee of our board of directors after completion of this offering.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Purchase of Shares of Common Stock in this Offering by Certain Executive Officers

Mr. Gold may purchase up to 150,000 shares of our Class A common stock in this offering at the public offering price. In addition, certain of our other executive officers and directors may purchase shares of our Class A common stock in this offering at the public offering price. No underwriting discount will be paid on the shares of Class A common stock purchases by Mr. Gold and our other executive officers and directors in this offering.

Restricted Stock Grants to Founders, Executive Officers and Directors

Founder Shares

In connection with the initial issuance of shares of our Class B common stock, we entered into restricted stock purchase agreements with each of our founding stockholders, Messrs. Gold, Smithers, Fahey, Kreitzer and Fenton. Pursuant to the restricted stock agreements, we issued an aggregate of 508,065 shares of our Class B common stock for a total purchase price of $508. Each of our founders has entered into a redemption agreement with us pursuant to which such shares of Class B common stock will be redeemed by us for $0.001 per share and cancelled immediately before the closing of this offering. See the section entitled “Description of Securities” for a description of our Class B common stock.

Other Restricted Stock Grants

It is expected that at the first meeting of the compensation committee of our board of directors after completion of this offering, Mr. Sistek, our chief financial officer and executive vice president, investments, and Mr. Wolfe, our vice president, general counsel and secretary, will each receive $275,000 in shares of Class A common stock under the Incentive Plan, or 13,750 shares of Class A common stock based on the assumed initial public offering set forth on the cover of this prospectus, which shares are expected to vest in their entirety 180 days after completion of the offering.

Reimbursement of IGP Advisers

We intend to use a portion of the net proceeds of this offering to reimburse IGP Advisers, a company that is owned by Messrs. Gold (76.5%), Smithers (18.5%) and Fahey (5%), for out-of-pocket expenses it incurred in connection with the formation of our company and this offering. In addition, we entered into a consulting agreement with IGP Advisers that provides for, upon the completion of this offering, a consulting fee of $500,000 to be paid to IGP Advisers for services rendered to assist us in completing this offering. Pursuant to the consulting agreement, the fee increases by $3,300 for each day that the closing of this offering occurs after November 15, 2016 (if the closing of this offering occurs on December 6, 2016, we will pay IGP Advisers an additional $69,000). In the event that this offering is not successful, a fee of $5,000 will be due to IGP Advisers under this consulting agreement. We also expect to use $375,000 of the net proceeds of this offering to reimburse IGP Advisers for an earnest money deposit it funded (credited against the total purchase price of $30 million), as required by the purchase agreement for our Initial Property. Following the completion of this offering, our agreements with IGP Advisers will terminate and we do not expect to transact business with, or incur costs related to, IGP Advisers in the future, as all of our employees will be employed directly by us through our Operating Partnership.

The amounts reimbursable to IGP Advisers are as follows:

Estimated Costs:
Offering Costs		$	720,000
Organizational Costs		$	50,000
Transaction Costs		$	20,000
Earnest Money Deposit		$	375,000
Estimated Consulting Fee		$	500,000
Total		$	1,665,000

Until the completion of this offering, each of our executive officers other Mr. Gold is a consultant to IGP Advisers and is being paid by IGP Advisers for such consulting service. Following the completion of this

TABLE OF CONTENTS

offering, these consulting arrangements will terminate and all of our executive officers will be employed directly by us through our Operating Partnership. Such executive officers will be paid the following amounts from IGP Advisers in connection with their services rendered to IGP Advisers as consultants on our behalf in connection with this offering:

Name		Consulting Fees (1)
Paul E. Smithers		$	227,202
Robert M. Sistek		$	35,233
Gregory J. Fahey		$	116,847
Brian J. Wolfe		$	42,707

Severance and Change in Control Agreements

Subject to the approval of the compensation committee of our board of directors after the completion of this offering, we expect to enter into severance and change in control agreements with each of Messrs. Gold, Smithers, Sistek, Fahey and Wolfe, as described in “Our Management — Executive Officer and Director Compensation — Compensation of Executive Officers — Severance and Change in Control Agreements.” These agreements will provide benefits to each of our executive officers in the event his employment is terminated under certain circumstances. We may enter into similar agreements with certain executive officers that we hire in the future.

Indemnification Agreements

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors, and expect to enter into indemnification agreements with future executive officers and directors. Each indemnification agreement provides, among other things, that we will indemnify, to the maximum extent permitted by law, the covered officer or director against any and all judgments, penalties, fines and amounts paid in settlement, and all reasonable and out-of-pocket expenses (including attorneys’ fees), actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending or completed action, suit, arbitration, alternative dispute resolution mechanism, investigation, inquiry, administrative hearing or other proceeding that arises out of the officer’s or director’s status as a present or former officer, director, employee or agent of the company. Each indemnification agreement also requires us, upon request of the covered officer or director, to advance the expenses related to such an action provided that the officer or director undertakes to repay any amounts to which he is subsequently determined not to be entitled.

The indemnification agreement is not exclusive of any other rights to indemnification or advancement of expenses to which the covered officer or director may be entitled, including any rights arising under our charter or bylaws or applicable law.

Related Party Transaction Policies

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(x) we were, are, or will be a participant, (y) the aggregate amount involved exceeds $120,000 and (z) a related person has or will have a direct or indirect interest. For purposes of this policy, a related person is (i) any person who is, or at any time since the beginning of our last fiscal year was, an executive officer, director or director nominee of ours, (ii) any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock, (iii) any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, or (iv) any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a general partner or principal or in a similar position, or in which all the related persons, in the aggregate, have a 10% or greater beneficial interest. Under this policy, the audit committee will be responsible for reviewing, approving or ratifying each related person transaction or proposed transaction. In determining whether to approve or ratify a related person transaction, the audit committee will consider all relevant facts and circumstances of the related person transaction available to it and will approve only those related person transactions that are in, or not inconsistent with, our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders, as the audit committee determines in good faith. No member of the audit committee will be permitted to participate in any consideration of a related person transaction with respect to which that member or any of his or her immediate family is a related person.

These policies may not be successful in eliminating the influence of conflicts of interest or related person transactions. If they are not successful, decisions could be made that might fail to reflect fully the interests of all stockholders.

Interested Director and Officer Transactions

Pursuant to Maryland law, a contract or other transaction between a company and a director or between the company and any other corporation or other entity in which a director serves as a director or has a material financial interest is not void or voidable solely on the grounds of the common directorship or interest, the presence of that director at the meeting at which the contract or transaction is authorized, approved or ratified or the counting of the director’s vote in favor thereof if (1) the material facts relating to the common directorship or interest and as to the transaction are disclosed to the board of directors or a committee of the board, and the board of directors or committee in good faith authorizes the transaction or contract by the affirmative vote of a majority of disinterested directors, even if the disinterested directors constitute less than a quorum, (2) the material facts relating to the common directorship or interest of the transaction are disclosed to the stockholders entitled to vote thereon, and the transaction is approved in good faith by vote of the stockholders, or (3) the transaction or contract is fair and reasonable to the company at the time it is authorized, ratified or approved.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES

The following is a discussion of our investment policies and our policies with respect to certain other activities, including financing matters and conflicts of interest. These policies may be amended or revised from time to time at the discretion of our board of directors, without a vote of our stockholders. Any change to any of these policies by our board of directors, however, would be made only after a thorough review and analysis of that change, in light of then-existing business and other circumstances, and then only if, in the exercise of its business judgment, our board of directors believes that it is advisable to do so in our and our stockholders’ best interests. We cannot assure you that our investment objectives will be attained.

Investments in Real Estate or Interests in Real Estate

We plan to invest principally in specialized industrial properties. Our executive management team will identify and negotiate acquisition opportunities. For information concerning the investing experience of these individuals, please see the sections entitled “Business” and “Our Management.”

We intend to conduct substantially all of our investment activities through our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. Except as set forth in the section entitled “Business — Investment Guidelines,” there are no limitations on the amount or percentage of our total assets that may be invested in any one property. Additionally, no limits have been set on the concentration of investments in any one location or facility type.

Additional criteria with respect to our specialized industrial properties is described in “Business — Our Business Objectives and Growth Strategies.”

Investments in Mortgages, Structured Financings and Other Lending Policies

We may make loans to third parties, which may be to joint ventures in which we participate, subject to maintaining our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act and our qualification as a REIT.

Investments in Securities of or Interests in Persons Primarily Engaged in Real Estate Activities and Other Issuers

Subject to the requirements for qualification as a REIT, we may, but do not intend to, underwrite or invest in equity or debt securities of other REITs, other entities engaged in real estate related activities or securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control. However, we do not anticipate investing in other issuers of securities for the purpose acquiring any investments primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business or holding any investments with a view to making short-term profits from their sale. In any event, we do not intend that our investments in securities will cause us to fall within the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act. For this reason, we do not plan to register as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act, and we intend to divest securities before any registration would be required.

Generally speaking, we do not expect to engage in any significant investment activities with other entities, although we may consider joint venture investments with other investors. We may also invest in the securities of other issuers in connection with acquisitions of indirect interests in properties (normally general or limited partnership interests in special purpose partnerships owning properties).

We do not intend to engage in trading, underwriting, agency distribution or sales of securities of other issuers.

Disposition Policy

Although we have no current plans to dispose of any of the specialized industrial properties we acquire, we will consider doing so, subject to REIT qualification and prohibited transaction rules under the Code, if our board of directors determines that a sale of a property would be in our interests based on the price being offered for the property, the operating performance of the property, the tax consequences of the sale and other factors and circumstances surrounding the proposed sale.

Equity Capital and Debt Financing Policies

If our board of directors determines that additional capital is required or appropriate, we may raise such funds through additional offerings of equity or debt securities or the retention of cash flow (subject to the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

distribution requirements applicable to REITs and our desire to minimize our U.S. federal income tax obligations) or any combination of these methods. In the event that our board of directors determines to raise additional equity or debt capital, it has the authority, without stockholder approval, to issue additional common stock, preferred stock or debt securities in any manner and on such terms and for such consideration as it deems appropriate, at any time, subject to compliance with applicable rules on the exchanges where our securities trade. While our investment guidelines initially provide that our aggregate borrowings (secured and unsecured) will not exceed 50% of the cost of our tangible assets at the time of any new borrowing, our board of directors has similarly broad authority to approve our incurrence of debt.

Subject to applicable law and the requirements for listed companies on the NYSE, our board of directors has the authority, without further stockholder approval, to issue additional authorized common stock and preferred stock or otherwise raise capital, including through the issuance of senior securities, in any manner and on the terms and for the consideration it deems appropriate, including in exchange for property. Existing stockholders will have no preemptive right to additional shares issued in any offering, and any offering might cause a dilution of investment. We may in the future issue common stock in connection with acquisitions. Where possible, we also may issue limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership to acquire properties.

Our board of directors may authorize the issuance of preferred stock with terms and conditions that could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a transaction or a change in control of our company that might involve a premium price for holders of our common stock or otherwise might be in their best interests. Additionally, preferred stock could have distribution, voting, liquidation and other rights and preferences that are senior to those of our common stock.

We may, under certain circumstances, purchase common or preferred stock in the open market or in private transactions with our stockholders, if those purchases are approved by our board of directors. Our board of directors has no present intention of causing us to repurchase any shares, and any action would only be taken in conformity with applicable federal and state laws and the applicable requirements for qualifying as a REIT.

In the future, we may institute a dividend reinvestment plan which would allow our stockholders to acquire additional shares of common stock by automatically reinvesting their cash dividends. Shares would be acquired pursuant to the plan at a price equal to the then prevailing market price, without payment of brokerage commissions or service charges. Stockholders who do not participate in the plan will continue to receive cash distributions as declared.

Conflict of Interest Policy

Our current board consists of Messrs. Gold and Kreitzer, and as a result, the transactions and agreements entered into in connection with our formation prior to this offering have not been approved by our other independent directors.

Effective upon closing of this offering, we intend to adopt policies to reduce potential conflicts of interest. See the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Related Party Transaction Policies.”

Reporting Policies

We intend to make available to our stockholders our annual reports, including our audited financial statements. After this offering, we will become subject to the information reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. Pursuant to those requirements, we will be required to file annual and periodic reports, proxy statements and other information, including audited financial statements, with the SEC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its charter for approval of these matters by a lesser percentage, but not less than a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Our charter provides for approval of these matters by the affirmative vote of holders of shares entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter.

Also, our operating assets are held by our subsidiaries and these subsidiaries may be able to merge or sell all or substantially all of their assets without the approval of our stockholders.

Class B Common Stock

In connection with the initial issuance of shares of our Class B common stock, we entered into restricted stock purchase agreements with each of our founding stockholders. Pursuant to the restricted stock agreements, we issued an aggregate of 508,065 shares of our Class B common stock for a total purchase price of $508. Immediately prior to the completion of this offering, such shares of Class B common stock will be redeemed by us for $0.001 per share and cancelled pursuant to redemption agreements between us and our founders, who hold all of the issued and outstanding shares of Class B common stock.

We do not intend to issue any additional shares of Class B common stock. Upon completion of this offering, we intend to reclassify the authorized and unissued shares of Class B common into shares of authorized and unissued shares of Class A common stock.

Power to Reclassify Our Unissued Shares of Stock

Our charter authorizes our board of directors to classify and reclassify any unissued shares of common or preferred stock into other classes or series of stock, including one or more classes or series of stock that have priority with respect to voting rights, dividends or upon liquidation over our common stock, and authorize us to issue the newly-classified shares. Prior to the issuance of shares of each new class or series, our board of directors is required by Maryland law and by our charter to set, subject to the provisions of our charter regarding the restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock, the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each class or series. Our board of directors may take these actions without stockholder approval unless stockholder approval is required by the terms of any other class of series of our stock or the rules of any stock exchange or automatic quotation system on which our securities may be listed or traded. Therefore, our board could authorize the issuance of shares of common or preferred stock with terms and conditions that could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control or other transaction that might involve a premium price for shares of our common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders. No shares of preferred stock are presently outstanding, and we have no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.

Power to Increase or Decrease Authorized Shares of Stock and Issue Additional Shares of Common and Preferred Stock

We believe that the power of our board of directors to amend our charter to increase or decrease the number of authorized shares of our stock, to authorize us to issue additional authorized but unissued shares of common or preferred stock and to classify or reclassify unissued shares of common or preferred stock and thereafter to authorize us to issue such classified or reclassified shares of stock will provide us with increased flexibility in structuring possible future financings and acquisitions and in meeting other needs that might arise. The additional classes or series, as well as the additional shares of common stock, will be available for issuance without further action by our stockholders, unless such approval is required by the terms of any other class or series of our stock or the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which our securities may be listed or traded. Although our board of directors does not intend to do so, it could authorize us to issue a class or series of stock that could, depending upon the terms of the particular class or series, delay, defer or prevent a change in control or other transaction that might involve a premium price for shares of our common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer

In order for us to qualify as a REIT under the Code, shares of our stock must be owned by 100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months (other than the first year for which an election to be taxed as a REIT has been made) or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Also, under Section 856(h) of the Code, a REIT cannot be “closely held.” In this regard, not more than 50% of the value of the outstanding shares of stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities) during the last half of a taxable year (other than the first year for which an election to be a REIT has been made). See the section entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” in this prospectus for further discussion on this topic.

Our charter contains restrictions on the ownership and transfer of shares of our common stock and other outstanding shares of stock. The relevant sections of our charter provide that, after the completion of this offering and subject to the exceptions described below, no person or entity may own, or be deemed to own, by virtue of the applicable constructive ownership provisions of the Code, more than 9.8% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the aggregate of our outstanding shares of stock or more than 9.8% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding common stock or any class or series of our outstanding preferred stock; we refer to these limitations as the “ownership limits.”

The constructive ownership rules under the Code are complex and may cause shares of stock owned actually or constructively by a group of related individuals or entities to be owned constructively by one individual or entity. As a result, the acquisition of less than 9.8% in value of the aggregate of our outstanding shares of stock and 9.8% (in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of any class or series of our shares of stock (or the acquisition of an interest in an entity that owns, actually or constructively, shares of our stock by an individual or entity), could, nevertheless, cause that individual or entity, or another individual or entity, to violate the ownership limits.

Our board of directors may, upon receipt of certain representations, undertakings and agreements and in its sole discretion, exempt (prospectively or retroactively) any person from the ownership limits and establish a different limit, or excepted holder limit, for a particular person if the person’s ownership in excess of the ownership limits will not then or in the future result in us failing the “closely held” test under Section 856(h) of the Code (without regard to whether the person’s interest is held during the last half of a taxable year) or otherwise cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT. In order to be considered by our board of directors for exemption, a person also must not own, actually or constructively, an interest in one of our tenants (or a tenant of any entity which we own or control) that would cause us to own, actually or constructively, more than a 9.9% interest in the tenant unless the revenue derived by us from such tenant is sufficiently small that, in the opinion of our board of directors, rent from such tenant would not adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT. The person seeking an exemption must provide such representations and undertakings to the satisfaction of our board of directors that it will not violate these two restrictions. The person also must agree that any violation or attempted violation of these restrictions will result in the automatic transfer to a trust of the shares of stock causing the violation. As a condition of granting an exemption or creating an excepted holder limit, our board of directors may, but is not be required to, obtain an opinion of counsel or private ruling from the Service satisfactory to our board of directors with respect to our qualification as a REIT and may impose such other conditions or restrictions as it deems appropriate.

In connection with granting an exemption from the ownership limits or establishing an excepted holder limit or at any other time, our board of directors may increase or decrease the ownership limits. Any decrease in the ownership limits will not be effective for any person whose percentage ownership of shares of our stock is in excess of such decreased limits until such person’s percentage ownership of shares of our stock equals or falls below such decreased limits (other than a decrease as a result of a retroactive change in existing law, which will be effective immediately), but any further acquisition of shares of our stock in excess of such percentage ownership will be in violation of the applicable limits. Our board of directors may not increase or decrease the ownership limits if, after giving effect to such increase or decrease, five or fewer persons could beneficially own or constructively own in the aggregate more than 49.9% in value of the shares of our stock then outstanding. Prior to any modification of the ownership limits, our board of directors may require such opinions of counsel, affidavits, undertakings or agreements as it may deem necessary or advisable in order to determine or ensure our qualification as a REIT.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our charter further prohibits:

Any person who acquires or attempts or intends to acquire beneficial or constructive ownership of shares of our stock that will or may violate the ownership limits or any of the other foregoing restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock will be required to immediately give written notice to us or, in the case of a proposed or attempted transaction, give at least 15 days’ prior written notice to us, and provide us with such other information as we may request in order to determine the effect of such transfer on our qualification as a REIT. The ownership limits and the other restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock will not apply if our board of directors determines that it is no longer in our best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT or that compliance with the restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock is no longer required in order for us to qualify as a REIT.

If any transfer of shares of our stock would result in shares of our stock to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons, such transfer will be void from the time of such purported transfer and the intended transferee will acquire no rights in such shares. In addition, if any purported transfer of shares of our stock or any other event would otherwise result in:

then that number of shares (rounded up to the nearest whole share) that would cause us to violate such restrictions will automatically be transferred to, and held by, a charitable trust for the exclusive benefit of one or more charitable organizations selected by us, and the intended transferee will acquire no rights in such shares. The transfer will be deemed to be effective as of the close of business on the business day prior to the date of the transfer in violation of the ownership limit or other event that results in the transfer to the charitable trust. A person who, but for the transfer of the shares to the charitable trust, would have beneficially or constructively owned the shares so transferred, or a “prohibited owner,” which, if appropriate in the context, also means any person who would have been the record owner of the shares that the prohibited owner would have so owned. If the transfer to the charitable trust as described above would not be effective, for any reason, to prevent violation of the applicable restriction on ownership and transfer contained in our charter, then our charter provides that the transfer of the shares will be void from the time of such purported transfer.

Shares of stock transferred to a charitable trust are deemed offered for sale to us, or our designee, at a price per share equal to the lesser of (1) the price paid per share in the transaction that resulted in such transfer to the charitable trust (or, if the event that resulted in the transfer to the charitable trust did not involve a purchase of such shares of stock at market price, defined generally as the last reported sales price reported on the NYSE (or other applicable exchange), the market price per share of such stock on the day of the event which resulted in the transfer of such shares of stock to the charitable trust) and (2) the market price on the date we, or our designee, accept such offer. We may reduce the amount payable to the charitable trust by the amount of dividends and other distributions which have been paid to the prohibited owner and are owed by the prohibited owner to the charitable trust as described below. We may pay the amount of such reduction to the charitable trust for the benefit of the charitable beneficiary. We have the right to accept such offer until the trustee of the charitable trust has sold the shares held in the charitable trust as discussed below.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Upon a sale to us, the interest of the charitable beneficiary in the shares sold terminates, and the charitable trustee must distribute the net proceeds of the sale to the prohibited owner.

Within 20 days of receiving notice from us of the transfer of the shares to the charitable trust, sell the shares to a person or entity designated by the charitable trustee who could own the shares without violating the ownership limits or the other restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock described above. After that, the charitable trustee must distribute to the prohibited owner an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the price paid by the prohibited owner for the shares in the transaction that resulted in the transfer to the charitable trust (or, if the event that resulted in the transfer to the charitable trust did not involve a purchase of such shares at market price, the market price per share of such stock on the day of the event that resulted in the transfer to the charitable trust) and (2) the sales proceeds (net of commissions and other expenses of sale) received by the charitable trust for the shares. The charitable trustee may reduce the amount payable to the prohibited owner by the amount of dividends and other distributions which have been paid to the prohibited owner and are owed by the prohibited owner to the charitable trust. Any net sales proceeds in excess of the amount payable to the prohibited owner will be immediately paid to the charitable beneficiary, together with any dividends and other distributions thereon. In addition, if, prior to discovery by us that shares of stock have been transferred to a charitable trust, such shares of stock are sold by a prohibited owner, then such shares will be deemed to have been sold on behalf of the charitable trust and to the extent that the prohibited owner received an amount for or in respect of such shares that exceeds the amount that such prohibited owner was entitled to receive, such excess amount will be paid to the charitable trust upon demand by the charitable trustee. The prohibited owner will have no rights in the shares held by the charitable trust.

The charitable trustee will be designated by us and will be unaffiliated with us and with any prohibited owner. Prior to the sale of any shares by the charitable trust, the charitable trustee will receive, in trust for the charitable beneficiary, all distributions made by us with respect to such shares and may also exercise all voting rights with respect to such shares. Any dividend or other distribution paid prior to our discovery that shares of stock have been transferred to the charitable trust will be paid by the recipient to the charitable trust upon demand by the charitable trustee. These rights will be exercised for the exclusive benefit of the charitable beneficiary.

Subject to Maryland law, effective as of the date that the shares have been transferred to the charitable trust, the charitable trustee will have the authority, at the charitable trustee’s sole discretion:

However, if we have already taken irreversible action, then the charitable trustee may not rescind and recast the vote.

If our board of directors determines in good faith that a proposed transfer would violate the restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock set forth in our charter, our board of directors may take such action as it deems advisable to refuse to give effect to or to prevent such transfer, including, but not limited to, causing us to redeem shares of stock, refusing to give effect to the transfer on our books or instituting proceedings to enjoin the transfer.

Every owner of more than 5% (or such lower percentage as required by the Code or the regulations promulgated thereunder) of the outstanding shares of all classes or series of our stock, including common stock, will be required to give written notice to us within 30 days after the end of each taxable year stating the name and address of such owner, the number of shares of each class and series of our stock that the person beneficially owns and a description of the manner in which such shares are held. Each such owner will be required to provide to us such additional information as we may request in order to determine the effect, if any, of such beneficial ownership on our qualification as a REIT and to ensure compliance with the ownership limits. In addition, each stockholder will, upon demand, be required to provide to us such information as we may request, in good faith, in order to determine our qualification as a REIT and to comply with the requirements of any taxing authority or governmental authority or to determine such compliance.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Any certificates representing shares of our stock, or any written statements of information delivered in lieu of certificates, will bear a legend referring to the restrictions described above.

These restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF MARYLAND LAW AND OUR CHARTER AND BYLAWS

The following description of the terms of our stock and of certain provisions of Maryland law is only a summary. For a complete description, we refer you to the MGCL and to our charter and our bylaws, the forms of which are filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Our Board of Directors

Our charter and bylaws provide that the number of directors we have may be established only by our board of directors but may not be fewer than the minimum number required under the MGCL, which is one, and our bylaws provide that the number of our directors may not be more than 15. Because our board of directors has the power to amend our bylaws, it could modify the bylaws to change that range. Upon completion of this offering, subject to the terms of any class or series of preferred stock, vacancies on our board of directors may be filled only by a majority of the remaining directors, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director elected to fill a vacancy will hold office for the remainder of the full term of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualifies.

Except as may be provided with respect to any class or series of our stock, under the MGCL at each annual meeting of our stockholders, each of our directors will be elected by our stockholders to serve until the next annual meeting of our stockholders and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualifies. A plurality of the votes cast in the election of directors is sufficient to elect a director, and holders of shares of common stock will have no right to cumulative voting in the election of directors. Consequently, at each annual meeting of stockholders, the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote will be able to elect all of our directors at any annual meeting.

Removal of Directors

Our charter provides that, subject to the rights of holders of any class or series of our preferred stock to elect or remove one or more directors, a director may be removed only with cause and only by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast generally in the election of directors. This provision, when coupled with the exclusive power of our board of directors to fill vacancies on our board of directors, precludes stockholders from (i) removing incumbent directors except with cause and upon a substantial affirmative vote and (ii) filling the vacancies created by such removal with their own nominees.

No Appraisal Rights

As permitted by the MGCL, our charter provides that stockholders will not be entitled to exercise appraisal rights unless a majority of our board of directors determines that appraisal rights apply, with respect to all or any classes or series of stock, to one or more transactions occurring after the date of such determination in connection with which stockholders would otherwise be entitled to exercise appraisal rights.

Dissolution

Our dissolution must be declared advisable by a majority of our board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast not less than a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on such matter.

Exclusive Forum for Certain Litigation

Our bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to an alternative forum, the state and federal courts in Baltimore, Maryland are the exclusive forum for certain litigation, including (i) derivative actions on our behalf, (ii) actions asserting claims of breach of any duty owed by any of our directors, officers or employees, (iii) actions asserting a claim against us or any of our directors, officers or other employees arising under the MGCL, our bylaws or our charter and (iv) actions governed by the internal affairs doctrine.

Business Combinations

Under the MGCL, certain “business combinations” (including a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or, in certain circumstances, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities) between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder (defined generally as any person who

TABLE OF CONTENTS

beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock or an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding voting stock of the corporation) or an affiliate of such an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Thereafter, any such business combination must generally be recommended by the board of directors of such corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least (1) 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding voting stock of the corporation and (2) two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the corporation other than shares held by the interested stockholder with whom (or with whose affiliate) the business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder, unless, among other conditions, the corporation’s common stockholders receive a minimum price (as defined in the MGCL) for their shares and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares. A person is not an interested stockholder under the statute if the board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which the person otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. A Maryland corporation’s board of directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance with any terms and conditions determined by it. These provisions of the MGCL do not apply, however, to business combinations that are approved or exempted by a Maryland corporation’s board of directors prior to the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder.

Control Share Acquisitions

The MGCL provides that a holder of “control shares” of a Maryland corporation acquired in a “control share acquisition” has no voting rights with respect to the control shares except to the extent approved by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding shares of stock in the corporation in respect of which any of the following persons is entitled to exercise or direct the exercise of the voting power of such shares in the election of directors: (i) a person who makes or proposes to make a control share acquisition, (ii) an officer of the corporation or (iii) an employee of the corporation who is also a director of the corporation. “Control shares” are voting shares of stock which, if aggregated with all other such shares of stock owned by the acquirer, or in respect of which the acquirer is able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquirer to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges of voting power: (i) one-tenth or more but less than one-third; (ii) one-third or more but less than a majority; or (iii) a majority or more of all voting power. Control shares do not include shares that the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval or shares acquired directly from the corporation. A “control share acquisition” means the acquisition of issued and outstanding control shares, subject to certain exceptions.

A person who has made or proposes to make a control share acquisition, upon satisfaction of certain conditions (including an undertaking to pay expenses and delivering an “acquiring person statement” as described in the MGCL), may compel the board of directors to call a special meeting of stockholders to be held within 50 days of demand to consider the voting rights of the shares. If no request for a meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the question at any stockholders meeting.

If voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the acquiring person does not deliver an “acquiring person statement” as required by the statute, then, subject to certain conditions and limitations, the corporation may redeem any or all of the control shares (except those for which voting rights have previously been approved) for fair value determined, without regard to the absence of voting rights for the control shares, as of the date of the last control share acquisition by the acquirer or as of any meeting of stockholders at which the voting rights of such shares are considered and not approved. If voting rights for control shares are approved at a stockholders meeting and the acquirer becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as determined for purposes of such appraisal rights may not be less than the highest price per share paid by the acquirer in the control share acquisition.

The control share acquisition statute does not apply to (i) shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction or (ii) acquisitions approved or exempted by the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

charter or bylaws of the corporation. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the control share acquisition statute any and all acquisitions by any person of shares of our stock. There can be no assurance that such provision will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future by our board of directors.

Subtitle 8

Subtitle 8 of the MGCL permits a Maryland corporation with a class of equity securities registered under the Exchange Act and at least three independent directors to elect to be subject, by provision in its charter or bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors and notwithstanding any contrary provision in the charter or bylaws, to any or all of five provisions of the MGCL which provide for:

Our charter provides that, at such time as we are able to make a Subtitle 8 election (which we expect to be upon the completion of this offering), vacancies on our board may be filled only by the remaining directors and for the remainder of the full term of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred. Through provisions in our charter and bylaws unrelated to Subtitle 8, we already (i) require the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast not less than two-thirds of all of the votes entitled to be cast generally in the election of directors for the removal of any director from the board, only with cause, (ii) vest in the board of directors the exclusive power to fix the number of directorships and (iii) require, unless called by our chairman of the board, our chief executive officer or our board of directors, the written request of stockholders entitled to cast not less than a majority of all votes entitled to be cast at such a meeting to call a special meeting of our stockholders.

Meetings of Stockholders

Pursuant to our bylaws, a meeting of our stockholders for the election of directors and the transaction of any business will be held annually on a date and at the time and place set by our board of directors. The chairman of our board of directors, our chief executive officer or our board of directors may call a special meeting of our stockholders. Subject to the procedural requirements specified in our bylaws, a special meeting of our stockholders to act on any matter that may properly be brought before a meeting of our stockholders must also be called by our secretary upon the written request of the stockholders entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting on such matter and containing the information required by our bylaws. Only the matters set forth in the notice of special meeting may be considered and acted upon at such meeting.

Amendment to Our Charter and Bylaws

Except for amendments to the provisions of our charter relating to the removal of directors, and the vote required to amend this provision (which must be advised by our board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast not less than two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the election), our charter generally may be amended only if advised by our board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. As permitted by the MGCL, our charter contains a provision permitting our directors, without any action by our stockholders, to amend the charter to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue.

Our board of directors has the exclusive power to adopt, alter or repeal any provision of our bylaws and to make new bylaws.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Advance Notice of Director Nominations and New Business

Our bylaws provide that, with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders, nominations of individuals for election to our board of directors and the proposal of other business to be considered by stockholders may be made only (i) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (ii) by or at the direction of our board of directors or (iii) by a stockholder who was a stockholder of record both at the time of giving the notice required by our bylaws and at the time of the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting on such business or in the election of such nominee and who has provided notice to us within the time period, and containing the information and other materials, specified by the advance notice provisions set forth in our bylaws.

With respect to special meetings of stockholders, only the business specified in our notice of meeting may be brought before the meeting. Nominations of individuals for election to our board of directors may be made only (i) by or at the direction of our board of directors or (ii) provided that the meeting has been called for the purpose of electing directors, by a stockholder who was a stockholder of record both at the time of giving notice and at the time of the special meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting in the election of such nominee and who has provided notice to us within the time period, and containing the information and other materials, specified by the advance notice provisions set forth in our bylaws.

Action by Stockholders

Our charter provides that stockholder action can be taken at an annual or special meeting of stockholders and by consent in lieu of a meeting if such consent is approved unanimously. These provisions, combined with the requirements of our bylaws regarding advance notice of nominations and other business to be considered at a meeting of stockholders and the calling of a stockholder-requested special meeting of stockholders, may have the effect of delaying consideration of a stockholder proposal.

Anti-Takeover Effect of Certain Provisions of Maryland Law and of Our Charter and Bylaws

The provisions of the MGCL, our charter and our bylaws described above including, among others, the restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock, the exclusive power of our board of directors to fill vacancies on the board and the advance notice provisions of our bylaws could delay, defer or prevent a change in control or other transaction that might involve a premium price for shares of our common stock or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders. Likewise, if our board of directors were to opt in to the classified board or other provisions of Subtitle 8 or if our board of directors were to opt in to the control share acquisition of the MGCL, these provisions of the MGCL could have similar anti-takeover effects.

Indemnification and Limitation of Directors’ and Officers’ Liability

Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision eliminating the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or active and deliberate dishonesty that was established by a final judgment and was material to the cause of action. Our charter contains a provision that eliminates the liability of our directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.

The MGCL requires us (unless our charter provides otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made a party by reason of his or her service in that capacity. The MGCL permits us to indemnify our present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made or threatened to be made a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Under the MGCL, we may not indemnify a director or officer in a suit by us or in our right in which the director or officer was adjudged liable to us or in a suit in which the director or officer was adjudged liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received. Nevertheless, a court may order indemnification if it determines that the director or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification, even though the director or officer did not meet the prescribed standard of conduct or was adjudged liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received. However, indemnification for an adverse judgment in a suit by us or in our right, or for a judgment of liability on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received, is limited to expenses.

In addition, the MGCL permits us to advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon our receipt of:

Our charter authorizes us to obligate ourselves and our bylaws obligate us, to the fullest extent permitted by Maryland law in effect from time to time, to indemnify and, without requiring a preliminary determination of the ultimate entitlement to indemnification, pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding to:

Our charter and bylaws also permit us to indemnify and advance expenses to any individual who served any predecessor of our company, in any of the capacities described above and any employee or agent of our company or a predecessor of our company.

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors, and expect to enter into indemnification agreements with future executive officers and directors, that provide for indemnification to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.

Insofar as the foregoing provisions permit indemnification of directors, officers or persons controlling us for liability arising under the Securities Act, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, this indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.

REIT Qualification

Our charter provides that our board of directors may authorize us to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without approval of our stockholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interests to attempt to, or continue to, qualify as a REIT. Our charter also provides that our board of directors may determine that compliance with any restriction or limitation on ownership and transfer of our stock is no longer required for us to qualify as a REIT.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Grants Under the Incentive Plan

The Incentive Plan provides for the grant of incentive awards to our executive officers, directors, employees, and consultants. We expect to issue 13,750 shares of Class A common stock to each of Messrs. Sistek and Wolfe at the first meeting of the compensation committee of our board of directors after completion of this offering, and intend to reserve an additional 972,500 shares of Class A common stock for future issuance under the Incentive Plan.

We intend to file with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-8 covering the shares of Class A common stock issuable under the Incentive Plan. Common stock covered by this registration statement, including any shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options or restricted stock, will be eligible for transfer or resale without restriction under the Securities Act unless held by affiliates.

Lock-up Agreements

We and each of our executive officers and directors have agreed with the underwriters not to offer, sell or otherwise dispose of any common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for or repayable with common stock (including limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership) or any rights to acquire common stock for 180 days after the date of this prospectus, without first obtaining the written consent of Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., the representative of the underwriters. Specifically, we and these other persons have agreed, with certain limited exceptions, not to directly or indirectly:

This lock-up provision applies to common stock and to securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for or repayable with common stock. It also applies to common stock owned now or acquired later by the person executing the agreement or for which the person executing the agreement later acquires the power of disposition.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OUR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP AND THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

We have summarized the material terms and provisions of the Agreement of Limited Partnership of IIP Operating Partnership, LP, or the “Operating Partnership Agreement.” This summary is not complete. For more detail, you should refer to the partnership agreement itself, a copy of which is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. See the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information.” For purposes of this section, references to “we,” “our, “us” and “our company” refer to Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.

Our Operating Partnership is a Delaware limited partnership that was formed on June 20, 2016. We are the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership and, upon consummation of this offering, will own, directly or through a subsidiary, 100% of the partnership interests in our Operating Partnership. Until and unless partnership interests are issued to additional partners, our Operating Partnership is intended to be treated as an entity disregarded from our company for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Description of Partnership Interests

Initially, our Operating Partnership will have two classes of partnership interests: general partnership interests and limited partnership interests. General partnership interests represent an interest as a general partner in our Operating Partnership and we, as general partner, will hold all such interests. In return for a nominal initial capital contribution, our Operating Partnership will issue to us all of the general partnership interests.

Limited partnership interests represent an interest as a limited partner in our Operating Partnership. Our Operating Partnership may issue, at the sole discretion of the General Partner, additional partnership interests and classes of partnership interests with rights different from, and superior to, those of general partnership interests and/or limited partnership interests.

Since our Operating Partnership will initially be classified as an entity disregarded from our company for U.S. federal income tax purposes, our Operating Partnership’s assets, income and losses will be treated as our assets, income and losses. See the section entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations —  Taxation of Our Operating Partnership.”

Management of our Operating Partnership

Our Operating Partnership is organized as a Delaware limited partnership pursuant to the terms of the Operating Partnership Agreement. We are the general partner of our Operating Partnership and expect to conduct substantially all of our business through it. Pursuant to the Operating Partnership Agreement, we, as the general partner, will have full, exclusive and complete responsibility and discretion in the management and control of the partnership.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

revenue or capital contributions, we, as general partner, have the right to raise additional funds required by our Operating Partnership by causing it to borrow the necessary funds from third parties on such terms and conditions as we deem appropriate. As an alternative to borrowing funds required by our Operating Partnership, we may contribute the amount of such required funds as an additional capital contribution.

Liquidation

Upon the liquidation of our Operating Partnership, after payment of debts and obligations, any remaining assets of the partnership will be distributed to partners pro rata in accordance with their relative percentage interest ownership.

Distributions and Allocations

Distributions will be made, and all items of net income, net loss and any other individual items of income, gain, loss or deduction of our Operating Partnership will be allocated to the general partner and the limited partner based on their relative percentage interest ownership.

Term

Our Operating Partnership will continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2099 or until sooner dissolved and terminated upon (i) our election to dissolve the Partnership; (ii) the entry of a decree of judicial dissolution of our Operating Partnership; or (iii) by operation of law.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In connection with this offering, Foley & Lardner LLP will render an opinion that, commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2016 or, if later, the first year in which we have material real estate assets and operations, we will be organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the U.S. federal income tax laws, and our proposed method of operation will enable us to satisfy the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the U.S. federal income tax laws for our taxable year ending December 31, 2016 or, if later, the first year in which we have material real estate assets and operations, and thereafter. You should be aware that Foley & Lardner LLP’s opinion will be based on the U.S. federal income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT as of the date of such opinion, which will be subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis, will not be binding on the Service or any court, and will speak only as of the date issued. In addition, Foley & Lardner’s opinion will be based on customary assumptions and will be conditioned upon certain representations made by us as to factual matters, including representations regarding the nature of our assets and the future conduct of our business. Moreover, our qualification and taxation as a REIT will depend on our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, through actual results, certain qualification tests set forth in the U.S. federal income tax laws. Those qualification tests involve, among other things, the percentage of our gross income that we earn from specified sources, the percentage of our assets that fall within specified categories, the diversity of our stock ownership and the percentage of our earnings that we distribute. Foley & Lardner LLP will not review our compliance with those tests on a continuing basis. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the actual results of our operations for any particular taxable year will satisfy such requirements. Foley & Lardner LLP’s opinion will not foreclose the possibility that we may have to use one or more of the REIT savings provisions described below, which may require us to pay a material excise or penalty tax (and interest) in order to maintain our REIT qualification. For a discussion of the tax consequences of our failure to maintain our qualification as a REIT, see the section entitled “— Failure to Qualify” below.

If we qualify as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders because we will be entitled to a deduction for dividends that we pay. Such tax treatment avoids the “double taxation,” or taxation at both the corporate and stockholder levels, that generally results from owning stock in a corporation. In general, income generated by a REIT is taxed only at the stockholder level if such income is distributed by the REIT to its stockholders. However, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the following circumstances:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In addition, we may be subject to a variety of taxes, including payroll taxes and state, local and foreign income, property and other taxes on our assets and operations. We also could be subject to tax in situations and on transactions not presently contemplated.

Requirements for Qualification as a REIT

A REIT is a corporation, trust or association that satisfies each of the following requirements:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We must satisfy requirements 1 through 4, and 8 during our entire taxable year and must satisfy requirement 5 during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. Requirements 5 and 6 apply to us beginning with our 2016 taxable year. If we comply with certain requirements for ascertaining the beneficial ownership of our outstanding stock in a taxable year and have no reason to know that we violated requirement 6, we will be deemed to have satisfied requirement 6 for that taxable year. For purposes of determining stock ownership under requirement 6, an “individual” generally includes a supplemental unemployment compensation benefits plan, a private foundation, or a portion of a trust permanently set aside or used exclusively for charitable purposes. An “individual,” however, generally does not include a trust that is a qualified employee pension or profit sharing trust under the U.S. federal income tax laws, and beneficiaries of such a trust will be treated as holding our stock in proportion to their actuarial interests in the trust for purposes of requirement 6.

We believe that we will issue sufficient stock with enough diversity of ownership to allow us to satisfy requirements 5 and 6 above. In addition, our charter provides for restrictions regarding the ownership and transfer of shares of our capital stock. The restrictions in our charter are intended, among other things, to assist us in satisfying requirements 5 and 6 described above. These restrictions, however, may not ensure that we will be able to satisfy such share ownership requirements in all cases. If we fail to satisfy these share ownership requirements, our qualification as a REIT may terminate.

To monitor compliance with the share ownership requirements, we generally will be required to maintain records regarding the actual ownership of our shares. To do so, we must demand written statements each year from the record holders of significant percentages of our shares pursuant to which the record holders must disclose the actual owners of the shares (i.e., the persons required to include our dividends in their gross income). We must maintain a list of those persons failing or refusing to comply with this demand as part of our records. We could be subject to monetary penalties if we fail to comply with these record-keeping requirements. If you fail or refuse to comply with the demands, you will be required by Treasury Regulations to submit a statement with your tax return disclosing your actual ownership of our shares and other information. In addition, we must satisfy all relevant filing and other administrative requirements that must be met to elect and maintain REIT status. We intend to comply with these requirements.

For purposes of requirement 8, we have adopted December 31 as our year end for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and thereby satisfy this requirement.

Qualified REIT Subsidiaries.   A “qualified REIT subsidiary” generally is a corporation, all of the stock of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by a REIT and that is not treated as a TRS. A corporation that is a “qualified REIT subsidiary” is treated as a division of the REIT that owns, directly or indirectly, all of its stock and not as a separate entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Thus, all assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of a “qualified REIT subsidiary” are treated as assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of the REIT that directly or indirectly owns the qualified REIT subsidiary. Consequently, in applying the REIT requirements described herein, the separate existence of any “qualified

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REIT subsidiary” that we own will be ignored, and all assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of such subsidiary will be treated as our assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit.

Other Disregarded Entities and Partnerships.   The following discussion summarizes certain U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to our direct or indirect investments in our operating partnership and any subsidiary partnerships or limited liability companies that we form or acquire.

An unincorporated domestic entity, such as a partnership or limited liability company, that has a single owner, as determined under U.S. federal income tax laws, generally is not treated as an entity separate from its owner for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We own various direct and indirect interests in entities that are classified as partnerships and limited liability companies for state law purposes. Nevertheless, many of these entities currently are not treated as entities separate from their owners for U.S. federal income tax purposes because such entities are treated as having a single owner for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Consequently, the assets and liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit, of such entities will be treated as our assets and liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, including the application of the various REIT qualification requirements. Initially, and until the admission of additional partners, if any, we expect our operating partnership to be classified as an entity disregarded from us for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

An unincorporated domestic entity with two or more owners, as determined under the U.S. federal income tax laws, generally is taxed as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In the case of a REIT that is an owner in an entity that is taxed as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the REIT is treated as owning its proportionate share of the assets of the entity and as earning its allocable share of the gross income of the entity for purposes of the applicable REIT qualification tests. Thus, our proportionate share of the assets and items of gross income of any partnership, joint venture, or limited liability company that is taxed as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes is treated as our assets and items of gross income for purposes of applying the various REIT qualification tests. For purposes of the 10% value test (described in “— Asset Tests”), our proportionate share is based on our proportionate interest in the equity interests and certain debt securities issued by the entity. For all of the other asset and income tests, our proportionate share is based on our proportionate interest in the capital of the entity.

In the event that a disregarded subsidiary of ours ceases to be wholly-owned — for example, if any equity interest in the subsidiary is acquired by a person other than us or another disregarded subsidiary of ours — the subsidiary’s separate existence would no longer be disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Instead, the subsidiary would have multiple owners and would be treated as either a partnership or a taxable corporation. Such an event could, depending on the circumstances, adversely affect our ability to satisfy the various asset and gross income requirements applicable to REITs, including the requirement that REITs generally may not own, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the total value or total voting power of the outstanding securities of another corporation. See “— Asset Tests” and “— Gross Income Tests.”

We may from time to time be a limited partner or non-managing member in a partnership or limited liability company. If a partnership or limited liability company in which we own an interest takes or expects to take actions that could jeopardize our status as a REIT or require us to pay tax, we may be forced to dispose of our interest in such entity. In addition, it is possible that a partnership or limited liability company could take an action which could cause us to fail a gross income or asset test, and that we would not become aware of such action in time to dispose of our interest in the partnership or limited liability company or take other corrective action on a timely basis. In that case, we could fail to qualify as a REIT unless we were entitled to relief, as described below.

Taxable REIT Subsidiaries.   A REIT is permitted to own, directly or indirectly, up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. The subsidiary and the REIT generally must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS. However, a corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the securities is automatically treated as a TRS without an election. We generally may not own more than 10%, as measured by voting power or value, of the securities of a corporation that is not a qualified REIT subsidiary or a REIT unless we and such corporation elect to treat such corporation as a TRS. Generally, no more than 25% (20% for taxable years after 2017) of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Unlike a qualified REIT subsidiary, the separate existence of a TRS is not ignored for U.S. federal income tax purposes and a TRS is a fully taxable corporation subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on its earnings. We will not be treated as holding the assets of any TRS or as receiving the income earned by any TRS. Rather, we will treat the stock issued by any TRS as an asset and will treat any dividends paid to us from any TRS as income. This treatment may affect our compliance with the gross income tests and asset tests.

Restrictions imposed on REITs and their TRSs are intended to ensure that TRSs will be subject to appropriate levels of U.S. federal income taxation. These restrictions limit the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT and impose a 100% excise tax on transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT or the REIT’s tenants that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis, such as any redetermined rents, redetermined deductions, excess interest or redetermined TRS service income. In general, redetermined rents are rents from real property that are overstated as a result of any services furnished to any of our tenants by a TRS of ours, redetermined deductions and excess interest represent any amounts that are deducted by a TRS of ours for amounts paid to us that are in excess of the amounts that would have been deducted based on arm’s length negotiations, and redetermined TRS service income is income of a TRS that is understated as a result of services provided to us or on our behalf. Rents we receive will not constitute redetermined rents if they qualify for certain safe harbor provisions contained in the Code. Dividends paid to us from a TRS, if any, will be treated as dividend income received from a corporation. The foregoing treatment of TRSs may reduce the cash flow generated by us and our subsidiaries in the aggregate and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and may affect our compliance with the gross income tests and asset tests.

A TRS generally may be used by a REIT to undertake indirectly activities that the REIT requirements might otherwise preclude the REIT from doing directly, such as the provision of noncustomary tenant services or other services that would give rise to income that would not qualify under the REIT rules, or the ownership of property held for sale to customers. See “— Gross Income Tests — Rents from Real Property” and “— Gross Income Tests — Prohibited Transactions.”

Gross Income Tests

We must satisfy two gross income tests annually to qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT. First, at least 75% of our gross income for each taxable year must consist of defined types of income that we derive, directly or indirectly, from investments relating to real property or mortgage loans on real property or qualified temporary investment income. Qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test generally includes:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Second, in general, at least 95% of our gross income for each taxable year must consist of income that is qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test (except for income derived from the temporary investment of new capital), other types of interest and dividends, gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities (including interest and gain from nonqualified publicly offered REIT debt instruments as defined under Section 856(c)(5)(L)(ii) of the Code) or any combination of these.

Certain income items do not qualify for either gross income test. Other types of income are excluded from both the numerator and the denominator in one or both of the gross income tests. For example, gross income from the sale of property that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, income and gain from “hedging transactions,” as defined in “— Hedging Transactions,” and gross income attributable to cancellation of indebtedness, or “COD,” income will be excluded from both the numerator and the denominator for purposes of both the 75% and 95% gross income tests. For purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests, we are treated as receiving our proportionate share of our operating partnership’s gross income. We will monitor the amount of our non-qualifying income and will seek to manage our investment portfolio to comply at all time with the gross income tests. The following paragraphs discuss the specific application of the gross income tests to us.

Dividends.   Our share of any dividends received from any corporation (including dividends from any TRS that we may form, but excluding any REIT) in which we own an equity interest will qualify for purposes of the 95% gross income test but not for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Our share of any dividends received from any other REIT in which we own an equity interest, if any, will be qualifying income for purposes of both gross income tests.

Interest.   The term “interest,” as defined for purposes of both gross income tests, generally excludes any amount that is based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person. However, interest generally includes the following:

If a loan contains a provision that entitles a REIT to a percentage of the borrower’s gain upon the sale of the real property securing the loan or a percentage of the appreciation in the property’s value as of a specific date, income attributable to that loan provision will be treated as gain from the sale of the property securing the loan, which generally is qualifying income for purposes of both gross income tests, provided that the property is not inventory or dealer property in the hands of the borrower or the REIT.

Interest on debt secured by a mortgage on real property or on interests in real property, including, for this purpose, market discount, original issue discount, discount points, prepayment penalties, loan assumption fees, and late payment charges that are not compensation for services, generally is qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. However, if the loan is secured by real property and other property and the highest principal amount of the loan outstanding during a taxable year exceeds the fair market value of the real property securing the loan as of (i) the date the REIT agreed to originate or acquire the loan or (ii) as discussed below, in the event of a “significant modification,” the date we modified the loan, a portion of the interest income from such loan will not be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, but will be qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test. The portion of the interest income that will not be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test will be equal to the portion of the principal amount of the loan that is not secured by real property — that is, the amount by which the loan balance exceeds the applicable value of the real estate that secures the loan.

Interest on debt secured by mortgages on real property or on interests in real property, including, for this purpose, prepayment penalties, loan assumption fees and late payment charges that are not compensation for services, generally is qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Under the applicable Treasury Regulation (referred to as the “interest apportionment regulation”), if we receive interest income with respect to a mortgage loan that is secured by both real property and other property, and the highest

TABLE OF CONTENTS

principal amount of the loan outstanding during a taxable year exceeds the fair market value of the real property on the date that we acquired the mortgage loan, the interest income will be apportioned between the real property and the other collateral, and our income from the arrangement will qualify for purposes of the 75% gross income test only to the extent that the interest is allocable to the real property. Even if a mortgage loan is not secured by real property, or is undersecured, the income that it generates may nonetheless qualify for purposes of the 95% gross income test. In Revenue Procedure 2014-51, the Service interpreted the “principal amount” of the loan for purposes of that test to be the face amount of the loan, despite the Code’s requirement that taxpayers treat any market discount (discussed below) as interest rather than principal. In the case of real estate mortgage loans secured by both real and personal property, if the fair market value of such personal property does not exceed 15% of the total fair market value of all property securing the loan, then the personal property securing the loan will be treated as real property for purposes of determining whether the interest income from such loan qualifies for purposes of the 75% gross income test.

Hedging Transactions.   From time to time, we may enter into hedging transactions with respect to one or more of our assets or liabilities. Our hedging activities may include entering into interest rate swaps, caps, and floors, options to purchase such items, and futures and forward contracts. Income and gain from “hedging transactions” will be excluded from gross income for purposes of both the 75% and 95% gross income tests. A “hedging transaction” means (1) any transaction entered into in the normal course of our trade or business primarily to manage the risk of interest rate or price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made, or ordinary obligations incurred or to be incurred, to acquire or carry real estate assets, (2) any transaction entered into primarily to manage the risk of currency fluctuations with respect to any item of income or gain that would be qualifying income under the 75% or 95% gross income test (or any property which generates such income or gain) or (3) any new transaction entered into to hedge the income or loss from a prior hedging transaction, where the property or indebtedness which was the subject of the prior hedging transaction was extinguished or disposed of. We are required to clearly identify any such hedging transaction before the close of the day on which it was acquired, originated, or entered into and to satisfy other identification requirements. To the extent that we hedge for other purposes, or to the extent that we do not properly identify a hedging transaction, the income from those transactions will likely be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both gross income tests. We intend to structure any hedging transactions in a manner that does not jeopardize our qualification as a REIT; however, no assurance can be given that our hedging activities will give rise to income that is excluded from gross income or qualifies for purposes of either or both of the gross income tests. We may conduct some or all of our hedging activities through a TRS or other corporate entity, the income from which may be subject to U.S. federal income tax, rather than by participating in the arrangements directly or through pass-through subsidiaries.

Rents from Real Property.   To the extent that we acquire real property or an interest therein, rents we receive will qualify as “rents from real property” in satisfying the gross income requirements for a REIT described above only if the following conditions are met:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If a portion of the rent that we receive from a property does not qualify as “rents from real property” because the rent attributable to personal property exceeds 15% of the total rent for a taxable year, the portion of the rent that is attributable to personal property will not be qualifying income for purposes of either the 75% or 95% gross income test. Thus, if such rent attributable to personal property, plus any other income that is non-qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test, during a taxable year exceeds 5% of our gross income during the year, we would lose our REIT qualification. Further, the rent from a particular property does not qualify as “rents from real property” if (i) the rent is considered based on the income or profits of the tenant, (ii) the tenant either is a related party tenant or fails to qualify for the exceptions to the related party tenant rule for qualifying taxable REIT subsidiaries or (iii) we furnish non-customary services to the tenants of the property, or manage or operate the property, other than through a qualifying independent contractor or a taxable REIT subsidiary.

In addition to the rent, the tenants may be required to pay certain additional charges. To the extent that such additional charges represent reimbursements of amounts that we are obligated to pay to third parties such charges generally will qualify as “rents from real property.” To the extent such additional charges represent penalties for nonpayment or late payment of such amounts, such charges should qualify as “rents from real property.” However, to the extent that late charges do not qualify as “rents from real property,” they instead will be treated as interest that qualifies for the 95% gross income test.

Prohibited Transactions.   A REIT will incur a 100% tax on the net income derived from any sale or other disposition of property, other than foreclosure property, that the REIT holds primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. Any such income will be excluded from the application of the 75% and 95% gross income tests. Whether a REIT holds an asset “primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business” depends on the facts and circumstances in effect from time to time, including those related to a particular asset. No assurance, however, can be given that the Service will not successfully assert a contrary position, in which case we would be subject to the prohibited transaction tax on the sale of those assets. A safe harbor to the characterization of the sale of property by a REIT as a prohibited transaction and the resulting imposition of the 100% prohibited transactions tax is available, however, if the following requirements are met:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We will attempt to comply with the terms of the safe-harbor provisions in the federal income tax laws prescribing when an asset sale will not be characterized as a prohibited transaction. We cannot assure you, however, that we will be able to comply with the safe-harbor provisions or that we will avoid owning property that may be characterized as property held “primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business.” We may hold and dispose of certain properties through a taxable REIT subsidiary if we conclude that the sale or other disposition of such property may not fall within the safe-harbor provisions. The 100% prohibited transactions tax will not apply to gains from the sale of property that is held through a taxable REIT subsidiary although such income will be taxed to the taxable REIT subsidiary at U.S. federal corporate income tax rates.

Foreclosure Property.   We will be subject to tax at the maximum corporate rate on any income from foreclosure property, other than income that otherwise would be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, less expenses directly connected with the production of that income. Gross income from foreclosure property will qualify, however, under the 75% and 95% gross income tests. Foreclosure property is any real property, including interests in real property, and any personal property incident to such real property: