The f oll o wing s e lected consolidated f inanci a l information and other d a ta of the Compa n y should be r ead in conjunction with, and a r e qu a li f ied b y r efe r ence t o , “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our Audited Consolidated Financi a l St a tements and the notes the r eto included e ls ew he r e in this annual report.

The s e lected consolidated statement of f inanci a l position data as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and the selected consolidated statement of income, comprehensive income and cash flow data f or the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 have been der iv ed f r om our Audited Consolidated Financial St a tements included e ls ew he r e in this annual report. The s e lected consolidated statement of f inanci a l position data as of January 1, 2015 have been derived from our Audited Consolidated Financial statements not included in this annual report.

W e p r epa r e our Audited Consolidated Financi a l St a tements in acco r dance with IFRS as issued b y the IAS B . W e h av e a pplied a ll IFRS issued b y the IASB e f fect iv e a t the time of p r eparing our Audited Consolidated Financi a l St a tement s . W e a pplied IFRS f or the f irst time f or our f isc a l year ended December 31, 2016, w hich included comparative information f or the f isc a l y ear ended December 31, 2015.

RECONCILIATION OF NON-IFRS DATA

Adjusted EBITDA

For the definition of “Adjusted EBITDA” please see “Presentation of Financial Information.”

Adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to consolidated income from continuing operations below:

Not applicable.

Not applicable .

You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with the other information contained in this annual report, before making any investment decision. Any of the following risks and uncertainties could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition. The market price of our common shares could decline due to any of these risks and uncertainties, and you could lose all or part of your investment. The risks described below are those that we currently believe may materially affect us.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

Our concessions may be terminated under various circumstances, some of which are beyond our control.

Our business consists of acquiring, developing and operating airport concessions. These concessions are granted by governmental authorities for a limited period of time and subject to several conditions and obligations.

Our concessions may be terminated under various circumstances, some of which are beyond our control. In general, our concession agreements may be terminated at any time by the relevant governments or agencies for public interest reasons. For example, in 2017 the Peruvian Government unilaterally terminated the concession it had awarded to us for the construction and operation of the new Chinchero – Cusco International Airport in Peru (“Cusco Airport”). Concession agreements may also be terminated due to our material and repeated breach of the concession terms. The termination of one or more of our concessions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

If an applicable governmental authority terminates any of our concessions, with or without cause, we may be entitled to seek claims for compensation from such terminating governmental authority. Although termination payments vary by concession, they usually include a claim for indemnification equal to the value of the non-amortized investments made by us for purposes of operating the airports and rendering the services agreed under the concession agreements. If the applicable governmental authority terminates one of our concessions due to our material and repeated breach or failure to make the committed investments, we may assert claims for indemnification equal to those non-amortized investments we made for purposes of operating the relevant airports and rendering of the services agreed under the relevant concession agreements. If the concession is terminated by the relevant government or agency for public interest reasons or without cause, we may assert claims for indemnification equal to the non-amortized investments plus loss of profits. Collecting on such claims may be difficult and time-consuming, and any amounts collected in respect of such claims may not provide us with the expected level of returns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, as of February 2018, the Argentine Government has the right to buy out the AA2000 Concession Agreement upon prior notification to us and indemnify us for certain investments we incurred for purposes of operating the airports and rendering the services agreed thereunder. See “—Risks Related to Argentina and the AA2000 Concession Agreement—Pursuant to the AA2000 Concession Agreement, as of February 2018 and thereafter, the Argentine Government may buy out our concession, which would significantly affect our revenues and operations.”

We may be subject to monetary penalties or early termination if we fail to comply with the terms of our concession agreements.

We may be subject to monetary penalties if we violate or otherwise fail to comply with the terms of our concessions. Some violations of a concession agreement may provide for cure periods or other remedial action, while other violations, whenever they are substantial and repeated, can result in the immediate termination of the relevant concession. If we experience difficulties, we may encounter problems in satisfying our obligations under our concession agreements and the relevant governmental authorities may impose sanctions on us. For a description of the consequences that may result from the violation of various terms of our concessions, or local laws and regulations related to such concessions. Monetary penalties could negatively affect our results of operations.

In addition, under all of our concession agreements, we are required to establish and comply with an investment plan for the airports covered under such concession agreements. If we do not fulfill our investment commitments on a timely basis or obtain financing necessary to complete such projects, such failures could lead to a breach of the relevant concession agreement.

Our revenue and profitability may be affected if we fail to win new concession agreements, acquire companies with existing concession agreements, or otherwise improve or expand our current operations.

Our growth strategy relies upon identifying and winning new concession agreements, acquiring companies with existing concession agreements or improving and expanding our current operations. Our future growth may also depend on new (greenfield) development projects, which may require significant time and upfront financial commitments for construction and development. While we anticipate having opportunities to bid for concession agreements or purchase existing concessionaires in the future, we cannot predict the frequency of such opportunities. We must also strategically identify which concession agreements and existing concessionaires to target based on numerous factors such as number of passengers, size of the relevant airport(s), type, location and quality of the available airports and subconcession space, rental structure, financial return, regulatory requirements and the competitive landscape within such market. We may not be able to successfully expand, as we may not correctly analyze the suitability of airport locations, anticipate all of the challenges imposed by expanding our operations or succeed in executing our growth plan efficiently. We also may fail to expand within budget or on a timely basis, or expand at all. In addition, to win a particular concession contract, we may be required to make investments or incur other expenses that would render such concession less economically attractive.

Our growth strategy and the substantial investment associated with the acquisition of each new concession agreement, existing concessions or expansion of existing concessions may cause our operating results to fluctuate and be unpredictable.

The loss or impairment of our relationship with governments and their agencies in the markets in which we operate could adversely affect our business, future revenues and growth prospects.

Our principal assets are concession rights granted by governments in the countries in which we operate. Our business depends to a large extent on our ability to manage relationships with such governments and their agencies. During the term of our concessions, we are in continuous communications with the relevant governments and their agencies regarding, among other things, the terms and conditions of the concession, compliance with the concession agreement, the applicable master plan and works to be performed at the airports, including works not specifically required by the terms of the relevant concession, and the establishment of tariffs. Our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed if we were suspended or debarred from contracting with any such government or government agency or if our reputation or relationship with any such government or agency is impaired.

Our revenue is highly dependent on levels of air traffic, which depend in part on factors beyond our control, including economic and political conditions in the countries where we operate our airports.

Our revenue is closely linked to passenger and cargo traffic volumes and the number of air traffic movements at our airports. These factors directly determine our aeronautical revenue and indirectly determine our commercial revenue. Passenger and cargo traffic volumes and air traffic movements depend, in part, on many factors beyond our control. Such factors include economic conditions and the political situation in the countries where we operate our airports, epidemics, pandemics and other public health crises, terrorism, fluctuations in petroleum prices (which can have a negative impact on traffic as a result of fuel surcharges or other measures adopted by airlines in response to increased fuel costs), currency exchange rate fluctuations, geopolitical considerations and changes in regulatory policies applicable to the aviation industry. The occurrence of any of these risks may result in a reduction of passenger air traffic levels and air traffic movements globally and in the regions in which we operate. A significant decline in passenger and cargo traffic volumes and the number of air traffic movements at our airports would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face risks related to our dependence on the revenue from Ezeiza Airport.

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, Ezeiza Airport generated U.S.$535.0 million in revenue, or 34.0%, U.S.$522.1 million in revenue, or 38.2%, and U.S.$482.0 million in revenue, or 35.3%, respectively, of our consolidated revenue for such periods. As a result of the substantial contribution to our revenue from the Ezeiza Airport, any event or condition affecting this airport (in addition to any potential termination or buyout of the AA2000 Concession Agreement) could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, an economic recession in Argentina, a reduction in the operations of Ezeiza Airport, competition from other airports or a decrease in the number of passengers traveling to Buenos Aires as tourists could cause a decrease in our revenue at this airport which, in turn, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Increases in international fuel prices could reduce demand for air travel.

International prices of fuel have experienced significant volatility in recent years. The price of fuel may be subject to further fluctuations resulting from a reduction or increase in output of petroleum, voluntary or otherwise, by oil producing countries, other market forces, a general increase in international hostilities, or any future terrorist attacks. In the past, increased fuel costs were among the factors leading to cancellations of routes, decreases in frequencies of flights and, in some cases, even contributed to filings for bankruptcy by some airlines. Although fuel is a widely-traded global commodity, in the event of a significant increase in fuel prices in one or more of the countries in which we operate, or in one or more countries that provide significant numbers of international air passengers to the countries in which we operate, the effects of a localized price increase may be more significant than a general, worldwide increase in fuel prices. Significant fluctuations may result in higher airline ticket prices and in a decrease in demand for air travel generally, both of which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.

Extended interruptions or disruptions at the airports where we operate due to natural disasters, prolonged weather conditions and other adverse incidents could affect our business and results of operations.

A significant extended interruption or disruption in service at the airports where we operate could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our results of operations could be impacted by flight cancellations and airport closures caused by weather and natural disasters. Severe weather conditions, particularly heavy snowfall, increases in the frequency, severity and duration of natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes, volcanic activity, earthquakes and tsunamis, including from changes in the global climate, can significantly disrupt service, cause cancellation of flights and negatively affect passenger traffic at airports, which may result in decreased revenues and increased costs.

The disaster recovery and business continuity plans we have in place may prove inadequate in the event of a serious disaster or similar event. We may incur substantial expenses as a result of the limited nature of our disaster recovery and business continuity plans, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Outbreaks of disease and health epidemics could have a negative impact on international air travel.

Public health crises such as the outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (known as SARS) between 2002 and 2003, the outbreak of the A/H1N1 virus of 2009 and the Ebola pandemic in 2014–2015 have disrupted the frequency and pattern of air travel worldwide in recent years. Most recently, travel to the Caribbean and Latin American countries has been affected as a result of the Zika virus. Because our revenue is largely dependent on the level of passenger traffic in our airports, any outbreaks of health epidemics, such as the H1N1 virus and the Zika virus, could result in decreased passenger traffic and increased costs to the air travel industry and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on our business revenues and results of operations.

We could be subject to acts of terrorism or war, which could have a negative impact on air travel and result in increased security requirements.

Our airports operate within a stringent and complex security regime, as required by the relevant governmental authorities, which may impose additional security measures from time to time, including as a result of a terrorist attack. The consequences of any future terrorist action or threat may include the cancellation or delay of flights, fewer airlines and passengers using our airports, liability for damage or loss and the costs of repairing damage. If a terrorist attack affected one of the airports we operate, the airport in question would be closed, in whole or in part, for the time needed to care for victims, investigate the circumstances of the attack, rebuild any damaged areas or otherwise, with a subsequent decrease in the revenue and increase in costs for the reconstruction of the affected areas (to the extent these are not covered by insurance policies).

Moreover, if an act of terrorism or threat thereof were to occur in a country in which we operate, even if not at our airports, the perception of safety by airport users could decrease, and, consequently, there could be a reduction in passenger air traffic for an indefinite period of time, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, the implementation of additional security measures at our airports in the future could lead to additional limitations on airport capacity or retail space, overcrowding, increases in operating costs and delays to passenger movement through the airport, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business may also be affected by the outbreak of wars or armed conflicts in any region of the world. Among other things, wars can lead to increased prices of fuel, supplies and interest rates for aircraft leases, which could, in turn, lead to increased prices of airline tickets and a decline in demand for air transportation in general. Likewise, the occurrence of armed conflicts could result in increased security measures, thereby increasing security costs.

Any event that affects the safety standard perception of any of our aeronautical customers could result in a loss of significant passenger traffic volume.

Any accident, incident or other event that affects the safety standard perception of any of our aeronautical customers may affect its image and generate a public perception that it is less safe or reliable than other airlines. These events could harm consumer demand and the number of passengers serviced by such airline, which could in turn adversely affect the number of passengers using our airports, thereby having an adverse effect on our revenues.

Competition from other destinations could adversely affect our business.

The principal factor affecting our business is the number of passengers that use our airports. Our passenger traffic volume may be adversely affected by the attractiveness, affordability and accessibility of competing destinations. In addition, our passenger traffic volume may be adversely affected by the level of business activity in each destination or the likelihood of airlines using any of those destinations as a hub or base for their operations. If business activity and tourism levels, and therefore, the number of passengers using our airports, is negatively impacted by competing airports and hubs in the geographic regions in which we operate, such development could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We are subject to the risk of union disputes and work stoppages at our locations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Some of our employees are members of labor unions. For example, as of December 31, 2017, approximately 66.8% and 51.1% (54.0% and 49.7%, respectively, as of December 31, 2016) of our employees in Argentina and Italy, respectively, were members of labor unions. Negotiating labor contracts, either for new locations or to replace expiring contracts, is time consuming or may not be accomplished on a timely basis. In addition, we negotiate some of our collective bargaining agreements on an annual basis. If we are unable to satisfactorily negotiate those labor contracts with the labor unions on terms acceptable to us or without a strike or work stoppage, the effects on our business could be materially adverse. Any strike or work stoppage could disrupt our business, adversely affecting our results of operations and our public image could be materially adversely affected by such labor disputes. In addition, existing labor contracts may not prevent a strike or work stoppage, and any such work stoppage could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The operations of our airports may be affected by actions or inactions of third parties that are beyond our control.

In most of our airports, our operations are largely dependent on the services provided by governments and other third parties who render services to passengers and airlines, such as meteorology, air traffic control, security, electricity, and immigration and customs services. In addition, in some of our airports we are dependent on third-party providers of certain complementary services such as baggage handling, fuel services, catering and aircraft maintenance and repair. While we are responsible for adopting security measures at some of our airports, we do not control the management or operation of security, which is controlled by government agencies or third parties. We are not responsible for, and cannot control, any of these services. Any disruption in, or adverse consequence resulting from, such services, including work strikes or other similar events, could cause the cancellation of flights and negatively affect passenger traffic at our airports, which may ultimately result in decreased revenues and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

The loss of one or more of our aeronautical customers or the interruption of their operations could result in a loss of a significant amount of our passenger traffic.

None of our agreements with our aeronautical customers obligates them to provide service at to our airports. If any of our aeronautical customers were to reduce their use of our airports or cease to operate at them for any reason, including merger, bankruptcy or due to regulatory restrictions, the remaining airlines may not increase their flight frequency to replace the flights that our aeronautical customers were no longer operating. Our business and revenue could be adversely affected if we are unable to replace the business of our main aeronautical customers.

Our main aeronautical customers are LATAM Airlines Group and Grupo Aerolíneas Argentinas. For the year ended December 31, 2017, LATAM Airlines Group and Grupo Aerolíneas Argentinas accounted for 22.4% and 16.4% of our consolidated aeronautical revenue, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2016, LATAM Airlines Group and Grupo Aerolíneas Argentinas accounted for 22.8% and 15.2% of our consolidated aeronautical revenue, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2015, LATAM Airlines Group and Grupo Aerolíneas Argentinas accounted for 19.3% and 17.1% of our consolidated aeronautical revenue, respectively.

An aircraft accident or other material factors beyond our control may affect the operation of our runways.

Our runways may require unscheduled repair due to natural disasters, aircraft accidents and other factors beyond our control. The closure of any runway for a significant period of time could have a material adverse effect on the number of passengers that use our airports, and therefore, a material effect on our operations and financial results.

Ongoing and proposed construction, renovation or repair work at our airports could have a negative impact on our revenues.

At any time, we may be in the process of constructing, renovating and/or repairing a number of our airports. These works may sometimes affect the passenger experience, which may ultimately adversely affect our commercial revenue. The operations of our other airports may decrease or be adversely affected by future construction, renovations or repairs, and this could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We are exposed to certain risks in connection with the use of certain spaces by subconcessionaires at our airports.

We are exposed to risks related to the spaces subconcessioned to third parties, such as non-payment by subconcessionaires of certain fees and other lease arrangements or a weakening demand for the use of the spaces allocated to subconcessionaires. For example, many of our subconcessionaires’ locations are situated beyond the security checkpoints at airports, and they rely heavily on their customers spending a significant amount of time in the terminal and waiting areas of the airport terminals in which they have subconcessioned space. Changes in customers’ travel habits prior to departure, including an increase in the availability or popularity of airline business and first-class lounges, or an increase in the efficiency of ticketing, transportation safety procedures and air traffic control systems could reduce the amount of time that customers spend at such subconcessioned locations, which could materially reduce the revenue they are able to generate and which, in turn, could reduce the amount of fees and rent we can collect from our subconcessionaires. Any material reduction in the fees and lease payments that we are able to charge to our subconcessionaires could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our insurance policies may not provide sufficient coverage against all liabilities.

We are required to maintain insurance under all of our concession agreements and we seek to insure all risks for which insurance coverage is available on commercially reasonable terms. We can offer no assurance that our insurance policies will cover all of our liabilities in the event of an accident, natural disaster, terrorist attack or other incident. The insurance market for airport liability coverage generally, and for airport construction in particular, is limited, and a change in the coverage policy by the insurance companies involved could reduce our ability to obtain and maintain adequate or cost-effective coverage. For some of our airports, we do not currently carry business interruption insurance or property insurance against terrorism and related risks. Consequently, any substantial interruption of our business or terrorist attacks could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our financial condition.

We are exposed to liability to third parties for injuries or damages.

We are obligated to protect the public and to reduce the risk of accidents at our airports. As with any company dealing with the security of individuals, we must implement measures for the protection of the public, such as hiring private security services, maintaining our airports’ infrastructure and fire safety in public spaces, and providing emergency medical services. These obligations could expose us to liability to third parties for personal injury or property damage and, to the extent not adequately covered by insurance, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Most of our operations are in emerging markets.

Our existing concessions are mostly in countries with emerging economies, and investing in developing economies generally involves risks. These risks include political, social and economic events, any of which could impact our operations or the market value of our common shares and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. These risks and instability are caused by many different factors, including the following:

Emerging markets have historically experienced uneven periods of economic growth, as well as recession, periods of high inflation and economic instability. Adverse economic conditions in any of these countries could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Some of the countries in which we operate have experienced, or are currently experiencing, high rates of inflation. In an effort to control inflation, governments of these countries often maintain a tight monetary policy with high interest rates, thereby restricting the availability of credit and retarding economic growth. Inflation, measures to combat inflation and public speculation about possible additional actions have also contributed significantly to economic uncertainty in many of these countries and to heightened volatility in their securities markets. Periods of higher inflation may also slow the growth rate of local economies. Inflation is also likely to increase some of our costs and expenses, which we may not be able to fully transfer to our clients, which could adversely affect our operating margins and operating income in some of the emerging markets in which we operate.

Depreciation or fluctuation of the currencies of the countries where we operate could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Many of the countries where we operate have experienced volatility in the exchange rate of their currency against the U.S. dollar. Because we present our financial statements in U.S. dollars, this volatility may reduce the revenues we report or increase the expenses we report in any given period. These effects may in turn have an adverse effect on the market of our common shares. In addition, because we have a substantial amount of dollar-denominated indebtedness, exchange rate volatility may result in increased debt service costs. Finally, in some instances we receive revenues in a currency different from that in which we pay expenses, in which case currency volatility can affect the profitability of our operations.

We are subject to various environmental laws, regulations and authorizations that affect our operations and may expose us to significant costs, liabilities, obligations or restrictions.

We, our subconcessionaires and our aeronautical customers are subject to various environmental laws, regulations and authorizations governing, among other things, the generation, use, transportation, management and disposal of hazardous materials, the emission and discharge of hazardous materials into the ground, air or water, and human health and safety. Failure to comply with these environmental requirements, including the terms of our concession agreements, could result in our being subject to litigation, fines or other sanctions. We could also incur significant capital or other compliance costs relating to such requirements. We could also be held responsible for contamination, human exposure to hazardous materials or other environmental damage at our airports or otherwise related to our operations. Environmental claims have been asserted against us, and additional claims may be asserted against us in the future. See “Business—Legal Proceedings—Argentine Proceedings—Environmental Proceedings.” We are unable to determine our potential liability under these pending or possible future claims. We only have environmental insurance coverage for environmental damages at a limited number of our airports.

These environmental requirements, and the enforcement and interpretation thereof, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. Future environmental laws, regulations and authorizations may require us to incur additional costs in order to bring our airports into, and maintain, compliance. Our costs, liabilities, obligations and restrictions relating to environmental matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to review by taxing authorities, and an incorrect interpretation by us of tax laws and regulations may have a material adverse effect on us.

The preparation of our tax returns requires the use of estimates and interpretations of complex tax laws and regulations and is subject to review by taxing authorities. We are subject to the income tax laws of the countries in which we operate. These tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and relevant governmental taxing authorities, leading to disputes which are sometimes subject to prolonged evaluation periods until a final resolution is reached. In establishing a provision for income tax expense and filing returns, we must make judgments and interpretations about the application of these inherently complex tax laws. In some jurisdictions where we operate, the interpretations of tax laws by the taxing authorities are sometimes unpredictable and frequently involve litigation, introducing further uncertainty and risk as to our tax liability. If the judgment, estimates and assumptions we use in preparing our tax returns are subsequently determined to be incorrect, there could be a material adverse effect on us, which may ultimately affect our revenues. See “Business—Legal Proceedings—Tax Proceedings Related to Technical Assistance Agreements.”

We are dependent on information and communication technologies, and our systems and infrastructures face certain risks, including cybersecurity risks.

The operation of complex infrastructures, such as airports, and the coordination of the many actors involved in its operation require the use of several highly specialized information systems, including both our own information technology systems and those of third-party service providers, such as systems that monitor our operations or the status of our facilities, communication systems to inform the public, access control systems and closed circuit television security systems, infrastructure monitoring systems, air navigation systems, passenger ticketing and boarding, automated baggage handling, points of sale, terminals and radio and voice communication systems used by our personnel. In addition, our accounting and fixed assets, payroll, budgeting, human resources, supplier and commercial, hiring, payments and billing systems and our websites are key to the functioning of our airports. The proper functioning of these systems is critical to our operations and business management. These systems may, from time to time, require modifications or improvements as a result of changes in technology, the growth of our business and the functioning of each of these systems.

While we have contingency plans, backup systems, information and communication redundant systems, testing and certification procedures and information technology auditing systems, among others, these information systems cannot be completely protected against certain events such as natural disasters, fraud, computer viruses, hacking, communication failures, equipment breakdown, software errors and other technical problems.

The risk of cyber-crime has been increasing, especially as infiltrating technology is becoming increasingly sophisticated. If we are unable to prevent a significant cyber-attack, such attack could materially affect the number of passengers at our airports, cause the loss of passenger information, damage our reputation and lead to regulatory penalties and financial losses.

We have implemented continuity measures and technology disaster recovery plans to mitigate the damage from such incidents and in the future may incur in significant costs to protect against security threats or to alleviate problems caused by failures of or breaches to our systems. However, we cannot assure you that these measures will be adequate to prevent disruptions in all cases, the occurrence of which could significantly disrupt our operations, resulting in increased costs, a decline in revenue and significant harm to our business (including our public image) in general.

Our acquisition strategy could involve additional risks to us, many of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We continue to examine opportunities to acquire or invest in existing or new concessions that complement or expand our business. These opportunities may involve government-owned entities as well as private sector companies. Any future acquisitions may result in a dilutive issuance of equity securities, incurrence of additional debt, reduction of existing cash balances, amortization of expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets or other charges to operations. Additional leverage could require us to dedicate cash flow to fund debt service requirements, thus decreasing the funds available to us to finance working capital and business operations generally. All of the foregoing factors could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

Future acquisitions could involve numerous risks, including that we may recognize lower relative operating margins associated with such acquisitions, and we may recognize impairment charges with respect to future acquired assets due to the performance of such assets. Our results of operations may also be affected by the timing of acquisitions, the timing and amount of integration costs related to such acquisitions and the degree to and the rate at which the economic benefits of integration are realized.

Future growth may also place additional demands on our personnel and other resources, including an increased level of responsibility for management. Our ability to manage growth effectively will require us to continue to improve our operational, management and financial systems and controls and to successfully train, motivate and manage our employees. If our management is unable to manage growth effectively, our business could be adversely affected.

Our inability to raise additional financing may limit our operations.

We may have limited ability to incur additional financing for some of our concession agreements, which may entail important consequences for investors, among them (i) limiting our capacity to satisfy our future investment obligations with respect to the airports we operate pursuant to the terms and conditions of our concession agreements, or other capital expenditures required for the operation of such airports; and (ii) limiting our flexibility to take advantage of opportunities for new business within the markets we operate or potential new markets. Any of these situations may ultimately affect our operations and financial results.

Many of our most significant subsidiaries have substantial minority interests outstanding.

We own indirectly 81.3%, 55.7% and 51.0% of our principal Argentina, Italy and Brazil operating subsidiaries, respectively, which are namely Aeropuertos Argentina 2000 S.A. (“AA2000”), Toscana Aeroporti S.p.A. (“TA”) and ICAB. Because we control these entities, we record all their revenues and expenses and then allocate net income between controlling and non-controlling interest. The other shareholders–including, in the case of Italy, public shareholders–of these entities may have interests different from ours, and any substantial conflict with minority shareholders may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We may have conflicts of interest with ACI Airports S.à r.l., our majority shareholder, and we may not be able to resolve such conflicts on terms favorable to us.

We are currently controlled by ACI Airports S.à r.l., a holding company incorporated in Luxembourg (the “Majority Shareholder”). Conflicts of interest may arise between our Majority Shareholder and us in a number of areas relating to our past and ongoing relationships. Potential conflicts of interest that we have identified include, among others, allocation of business and investment opportunities and/or the acquisition of airport assets outside of our existing corporate structure. Generally, the Majority Shareholder may from time to time make strategic decisions that it believes are in the best interest of the business as a whole, including its ownership interest in our business. These decisions may be different from the decisions that we would have made on our own and may not be aligned with your interests. We may not be able to resolve any potential conflicts and, even if we do, the resolution may be less favorable to us than if we were dealing with an unaffiliated party.

We have been advised by SCF, our ultimate controlling shareholder, that it does not intend to participate in any significant future acquisitions of airport concession assets or airport-related companies, except through us.

The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration or another regulatory agency could downgrade the aviation safety rating of any of the countries in which we operate, which could have a negative impact on passenger traffic.

Under the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration regulations, the aviation safety rating of any of the countries in which we operate could be downgraded. Airlines from such countries could be prevented from expanding or changing their current operations to and from the United States, except under certain limited circumstances, code-sharing arrangements between such airlines and U.S. airlines could be suspended, and operations by such airlines flying to the United States could be subjected to greater administrative oversight. Any such additional regulatory requirements could result in reduced passenger traffic originating in or departing to the United States by non-U.S. airlines operating at our airports or, in some cases, in an increase in that cost of service, which could result in decrease in demand for travel. The Federal Aviation Administration may downgrade the air safety rating of any of the countries in which we operate in the future. The European Aviation Safety Agency and other regulatory agencies may take similar actions, either independently or in response to any such action by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration. Such actions might reduce our revenues and have a negative impact on passenger traffic.

We are subject to anti-corruption laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate.

We are subject to and bound by U.S. and foreign anti-corruption laws and regulations, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Argentine Anticorruption Law of 2018 (Law No. 27,401), the Italian Corruption Law of 2012 (Law No. 190) and the Brazil Clean Company Act of 2014 (Law No. 12,846). These anti-corruption laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business and/or other benefits. Many jurisdictions have recently implemented new anti-corruption laws (such as in the case of Argentina and Brazil) or have broadened the scope of existing anti-corruption laws (such as in the case of Italy). The Brazilian Clean Company Act holds companies strictly liable for the corrupt acts of their employees and intermediaries, which means that a company may be held liable for such acts, without a finding of fault on the part of the company. See “—Risks Related to Our Other Principal Operations and Other Principal Markets in Which We Operate—Brazil—The ongoing economic uncertainty and political instability in Brazil may adversely affect our economic and financial condition” and “— Risks Related to Our Other Principal Operations and Other Principal Markets in Which We Operate— Brazil— We have identified payments made by ICAB that may not have had any proper purpose and that could expose us to fines and sanctions as well as reputational harm and other adverse effects.” Our business requires that we maintain continuous contact with governments and agencies from the initial bid process for any concession and throughout the entire term of any concession we are awarded. Despite our ongoing efforts to ensure compliance with anti-corruption laws, there can be no assurance that our employees, agents, and the companies to which we outsource certain of our business operations, will not take actions in violation of our policies, for which we may be ultimately held responsible. If we are not in compliance with anti-corruption laws and other laws governing the conduct of business with government entities (including local laws), we may be subject to criminal and civil penalties and other remedial measures, which could harm our reputation and have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Any investigation of any actual or alleged violations of such laws could also harm our reputation or have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Argentina and the AA2000 Concession Agreement

The AA2000 Concession Agreement expires in 2028, unless it is extended by the Argentine Government.

The AA2000 Concession Agreement expires in February 2028. Subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions by AA2000 and the authorization of the Argentine Government, we may extend the term of the AA2000 Concession Agreement for an additional period of up to 10 years. We have made a formal request to the Organismo Regulador del Sistema Nacional de Aeropuertos (the “ORSNA”) to extend the term of the concession for the additional 10-year period. However, under Section 5.2 of the AA2000 Concession Agreement, if the concession is extended, the Argentine Government has reserved the right to maintain, modify or eliminate the exclusivity granted under the concession. In case the Argentine Government does not extend the AA2000 Concession, our revenue will be significantly affected.

Pursuant to the AA2000 Concession Agreement, as of February 2018 and thereafter, the Argentine Government may buy out our concession, which would materially affect our revenues and operations.

Pursuant to the AA2000 Concession Agreement, on or after February 13, 2018, the Argentine Government has the right to “buy-out” (“ rescatar ”) the AA2000 Concession Agreement upon prior notification to us. In the event the Argentine Government were to exercise this option, it would be required to indemnify us in an amount equal to the value of the non-amortized aeronautical investments we have made as of the time of the buy-out, multiplied by 1.10, plus the value of all other investments we made that have not been amortized. The Argentine Government would not be required to indemnify us for investments that were not included in our investment plan or that were not approved by the ORSNA. The Argentine Government would also not be required to indemnify us for lost revenue. The Argentine Government would be required to assume in full any debts incurred by us to acquire goods or services for the purposes of providing airport services, except for debts incurred in connection with the investment plan for which we would be compensated as part of the payment made to us by the Argentine Government. Subsequent to such buy-out, we may have other claims against the Argentine Government or the ORSNA, but we may not prevail on these claims.

Furthermore, the buy-out of the AA2000 Concession Agreement would constitute an event of default under our 6.875% senior secured notes due 2027 (the “Argentine Notes”), which will result in automatic acceleration of the Argentine Notes. As of the date of this annual report, the total amount outstanding under the Argentine Notes is U.S.$400.0 million. The Argentine Government’s indemnification obligations in combination with the collateral structure under the Argentine Notes may not be adequate to repay the holders of such notes. See “Indebtedness.”

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the revenue derived from our operation of the airports under the AA2000 Concession Agreement represented 63.2%, 61.3% and 65.8%, respectively, of our total consolidated revenue. If the Argentine Government exercises its right to buy-out the AA2000 Concession Agreement, such buy-out would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The ORSNA may adjust the fees we charge for aeronautical services, the payments we are required to make to the Argentine Government and our investment plan in a way that is detrimental to us, or fail to adjust them to restore the AA2000 Concession Agreement’s economic equilibrium.

Under the AA2000 Concession Agreement, the ORSNA is required to review annually AA2000’s financial projections and, if necessary, to re-establish economic equilibrium by making adjustments to (i) the fees we charge airlines and passengers for aeronautical services, (ii) certain payments we make to the Argentine Government pursuant to the AA2000 Concession Agreement, and/or (iii) our investment obligations. Since the renegotiation of the AA2000 Concession in 2007, the Argentine Government has reviewed the financial projections six times. Effective January 1, 2017, the ORSNA adjusted the fees we may charge by decreasing the fee for international passengers from U.S.$57.00 to U.S.$49.00 and increasing the fee for domestic passengers from AR$29.73 to AR$74.33, in a way we believe is detrimental to us and therefore, we have filed a claim regarding this adjustment of fees. As of the date of this annual report, such claim has not been resolved.

In addition, the Argentine Government has recently hired a consulting firm to review the terms and conditions of the AA2000 Concession Agreement. According to the ORSNA, the Argentine Government is seeking to obtain detailed information about the quality of service provided by our airports under the AA2000 Concession Agreement as compared to the service levels at other international airports. It is unclear whether the Argentine Government expects to take any action based on the results of the consultant’s review.

If the ORSNA adjusts the fees we may charge or that we must pay under the AA2000 Concession in a way that is detrimental to us, if the ORSNA fails to adjust such fees in order to restore the AA2000 Concession Agreement’s economic equilibrium, or if the ORSNA seeks to modify our rights under the AA2000 Concession Agreement, such adjustments or failures to adjust, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We and the Argentine Government expect to renegotiate the terms of our AA2000 Concession. The Argentine Government has indicated to us that it will not consider that the consummation of our initial public offering will affect its possible position in any renegotiation process and/or any of its rights under the AA2000 Concession or applicable law. Any renegotiated terms of our AA2000 Concession could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If the parties fail to reach an agreement in any such renegotiation process, the Argentine Government could exercise its option to buy out the AA2000 Concession. See “—Risks Related to Argentina and the AA2000 Concession Agreement—Pursuant to the AA2000 Concession Agreement, as of February 2018 and thereafter, the Argentine Government may buy out our concession, which would materially affect our revenues and operations.”

If the ORSNA does not approve the capital expenditures already made under the AA2000 Concession Agreement, we would be required to make additional capital expenditures, which may affect our cash flows and financial condition.

The ORSNA reviews our capital expenditures to monitor our compliance with the investment plan under the AA2000 Concession Agreement, and to record such expenditures in the registry maintained by the ORSNA. If a capital expenditure is approved by the ORSNA, it is then entered into its registry.

Accordingly, we may record investments in any given period that have not yet been (and may never be) approved by the ORSNA. If the ORSNA does not approve our capital expenditures under the investment plan of the AA2000 Concession Agreement, we will be required to make additional capital expenditures. This may require us to obtain additional financing, which we may not be able to obtain on terms favorable to us, or at all. Our capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014, are currently under review by the ORSNA. In addition, we filed claims with the ORSNA in connection with the investment amounts recognized by the ORSNA for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, which as of the date of this annual report have not been resolved.

The ORSNA may reject the transactions whereby Cedicor S.A. acquired from Societa per Azioni Esercizi Aeroportuali and from Riva S.A.I.I.C.F.A. 8.5% and 0.85% of AA2000’s shares, respectively.

In June 2011, our subsidiary, Cedicor S.A. (“Cedicor”), which is the controlling shareholder of Corporación América S.A. (“CASA”), agreed to purchase from Societa per Azioni Esercizi Aeroportuali (“SEA”) 21,973,747 class A shares of AA2000, which represented 8.5% of AA2000’s ordinary capital and voting stock, and 2.5% of its capital stock on a fully diluted basis (including the preferred shares). In addition, in July 2011, 2,197,375 Class B Shares of AA2000 which represented 0.85% of AA2000’s ordinary capital and voting stock, and 0.25% of the capital stock on a fully diluted basis (including the preferred shares), were transferred to Cedicor by Riva S.A.I.I.C.F.A. (“Riva”).

Both of these transfers are subject to the prior authorization of the ORSNA. As of the date of this annual report, the ORSNA has not issued any resolution approving or rejecting such transaction. While this approval is pending, all economic and political rights pertaining to the shares, including all distributed dividends, have been assigned to Cedicor pursuant to the terms of the sale agreements between Cedicor and SEA and between Cedicor and Riva.

If the ORSNA rejects the transfers of shares, Cedicor is entitled to transfer the shares to a third party upon the ORSNA’s approval within 18 months of the date that ORSNA notifies Cedicor of its denial resolution. If the ORSNA subsequently rejects the transfer to the proposed third party, the agreements between Cedicor and each of SEA and Riva will cease to have any effect, except that (i) all payments made by Cedicor to SEA and Riva shall be retained by SEA and Riva; and (ii) all dividends distributed or to be distributed by AA2000 to Cedicor with respect to the transferred shares and all additional shares subscribed by Cedicor in exercise of the pre-emptive rights pertaining to such shares shall be retained by Cedicor. In such case, SEA and Riva will be reinstated as owners of all of the shares originally proposed to be transferred to Cedicor.

While we have no reason to believe that the transaction will be rejected, if the transaction is rejected by the ORSNA, then the ownership of AA2000 will be affected which in turn could ultimately reduce our share of the earnings of AA2000 which may not be completely offset by the consideration received from any transfer of the shares to a third party.

Our operations in Argentina depend on macroeconomic conditions in Argentina.

Our business and financial results in Argentina depend to a significant degree on macroeconomic, political, regulatory and social conditions therein, generally, and in the City of Buenos Aires, especially. The Argentine economy has experienced significant volatility in recent decades, characterized by periods of low or negative growth, high levels of inflation and currency devaluation, and may experience further volatility in the future.

Over the last years, Argentina experienced a period of severe political, economic and social crisis, which caused a significant economic contraction and led to radical changes in government policies. Among other things, the crisis resulted in Argentina defaulting on its sovereign foreign debt obligations, a significant devaluation of the Argentine peso and ensuing inflation, and the introduction of emergency measures that affected many sectors of the economy. Although Argentina has largely recovered from crisis, the pace of growth of Argentina’s economy has diminished.There is an increasing need for capital investment in many sectors. A decline in international demand for Argentine products, a lack of stability and competitiveness of the Argentine peso against other currencies, a decline in confidence among consumers and foreign and domestic investors, a higher rate of inflation and future political uncertainties, among other factors, may affect the development of the Argentine economy. Any of these factors may be especially significant if they have a concentrated impact on the City of Buenos Aires metropolitan region where our two main airports in the country are located. More recently the economy has shown signs of a slowdown, primarily due to the decline in global commodity prices and adverse conditions in Brazil, one of Argentina’s principal trading partners.

Volatility in the Argentine economy and measures taken by the Argentine Government have had and are expected to continue to have a significant impact on us. A decline in economic growth, increased economic instability or an expansion of economic policies and measures taken by the Argentine Government to control inflation or address other macroeconomic developments that affect private sector entities such as us—all developments over which we have no control—could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

The long-term impact of the presidential and congressional elections on the future economic and political environment of Argentina is uncertain.

The administration of Mauricio Macri took office on December 10, 2015. Since taking office, the new administration has announced and implemented several significant economic and policy reforms, including, among others: foreign exchange and trade reforms, electrical system state of emergency and reforms, reforms of gas prices, financial Policy and deficit reduction.

The long term impact that these measures and any future measures Macri’s administration may implement will have on the Argentine economy cannot be predicted. Some of the measures proposed by Macri’s administration may generate political and social opposition, which may in turn prevent the new government from adopting its proposed measures. Likewise, congressional elections were held in Argentina in October 2017, and although Macri’s party won in most jurisdictions, there is still uncertainty as to the administration’s ability to pass its proposed agenda or as to the possibility that some of the market reforms already executed may be reversed or amended.

We can offer no assurances as to the policies that may be implemented by the new Argentine administration, or that political developments in Argentina will not adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The long-term impact of the recent reforms to several Argentine economic indices is uncertain.

From 2007 to 2015, the Argentine National Statistics and Censuses Institute ( Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos) (the “INDEC”) underwent a process of institutional and methodological reforms that have created controversy with respect to the reliability and credibility of its reports with respect to the consumer price index, as well as other indexes published by the INDEC, including inflation, gross domestic product and unemployment data.

During December 2015 and January 2016, the Macri administration declared the national statistical system and the INDEC to be in a state of administrative emergency. The INDEC resumed its publication of the consumer price index in June 2016, after implementing certain methodological reforms and adjusting certain macroeconomic statistics on the basis of those reforms. The INDEC recently released revised GDP data for the years 2006-2015.

These events may affect the Argentine economy and investors’ perception of the country even after institutional and methodological reforms undertaken by the INDEC. Adverse economic developments, in turn, may ultimately affect the number of passengers in our airports in Argentina.

Argentina’s ability to obtain financing from international markets may be limited, which may in turn impair its ability to implement reforms and public policies and foster economic growth and could impact the ability of Argentine companies to obtain financing.

Argentina’s 2001 sovereign default and its failure to fully restructure its sovereign debt and negotiate with the holdout creditors has limited and may continue to limit Argentina’s ability to access international financing. In 2005, Argentina completed the restructuring of a substantial portion of its indebtedness and settled all of its debt with the International Monetary Fund. Additionally, in June 2010, Argentina completed the restructuring of a significant portion of the defaulted bonds that were not swapped in the 2005 restructuring. As a result of debt exchanges in 2005 and 2010, Argentina restructured approximately 92% of its defaulted debt that was eligible for restructuring. However, holdout bondholders that declined to participate in the restructurings filed lawsuits against Argentina in several countries, including the United States. In February 2016, the new Argentine administration entered into settlement agreements with certain holdout bondholders to settle these claims, which were subject to the approval of the Argentine Congress and the lifting of the injunctions imposed by the U.S. courts. In March 2016, after the U.S. District Court agreed to vacate the injunctions subject to certain conditions, the Argentine Congress ratified these settlement agreements through Law 27,249 and repealed the so-called Lock Law No. 26,017 and the Sovereign Payment Law No. 26,984, which prohibited Argentina from offering holdout bondholders more favorable terms than those offered in the 2005 and 2010 debt swaps. In recent months, the Argentine Government has reached settlement agreements with holders of a significant portion of the defaulted bonds and has repaid the majority of the holdout creditors with the proceeds of a U.S.$16.5 billion international offering of bonds on April 22, 2016. Although the size of the claims involved has decreased significantly, litigation initiated by bondholders that have not accepted Argentina’s settlement offer continues in several jurisdictions.

Additionally, foreign shareholders of several Argentine companies have filed claims with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) alleging that the emergency measures adopted by the Argentine Government since the crisis in 2001 and 2002 differ from the just and equal treatment standards set forth in several bilateral investment treaties to which Argentina is a party. ICSID has ruled against Argentina with respect to many of these claims.

Litigation involving holdout creditors, claims with ICSID and other claims against the Argentine Government resulted and may result in material judgments against the government, may lead to attachments of or injunctions relating to Argentina’s assets and could cause Argentina to default under its other obligations, and such events may prevent Argentina from obtaining favorable terms or interest rates when accessing international capital markets or from accessing international financing at all. In addition, Argentina’s ongoing litigation with the remaining holdout creditors as well as ICSID and other claims against the Argentine Government, or any future defaults on its financial obligations, may prevent Argentine companies, such as us, from accessing the international capital markets or cause the terms of any such transactions to be less favorable than those provided to companies in other countries in the region, potentially impacting our financial condition. Therefore, our ability to obtain favorable financing to develop or grow our operations in Argentina and in our airports may be impaired.

In June 2017, after the Macri administration had entered into settlement agreements with certain holdout bondholders, Argentina completed the U.S.$2.75 billion sale of 100-year government bonds. However, if, for any reason, Argentina is not able to access capital markets in the future, it could have a negative impact on our ability to obtain financing and our financial condition in Argentina.

Historical exchange controls and restrictions on capital inflows and outflows could limit the availability of international credit, adversely affecting the Argentine economy, and, as a result, our financial condition and results of operations.

Exchange controls introduced in Argentina in the past, and in particular after 2011 during the prior administration, gave rise to an unofficial U.S. dollar trading market, and the Argentine peso/U.S. dollar exchange rate in that market substantially differed from the official Argentine peso/U.S. dollar exchange rate. Additionally, the level of international reserves deposited with the Argentine Central Bank significantly decreased from U.S.$47.4 billion as of November 1, 2011, to U.S.$25.6 billion as of December 31, 2015. The decline in international reserves reduced the Argentine Government’s ability to intervene in the foreign exchange market and to provide access to such markets to private sector entities. The Macri administration has eliminated a significant portion of foreign exchange restrictions, including certain currency controls that were imposed by the previous administration. On August 8, 2016, the Argentine Central Bank introduced material changes to the foreign exchange regime and established a new foreign exchange regime by means of Communication “A” 6037 that significantly eases access to the free floating foreign exchange market. As of April 13, 2018, the level of international reserves deposited with the Argentine Central Bank had increased again to U.S.$61.6 billion.

Although the Macri administration has lifted most of the restrictions on capital inflows and outflows in and from Argentina and the level of international reserves deposited with the Argentine Central Bank have increased significantly, in the future the Argentine Government could impose new exchange controls or restrictions on the movement of capital and/or take other measures in response to capital flight or a significant depreciation of the peso, which could limit our ability to access the international capital markets and our ability to make payments abroad may be affected. Such measures could lead to political and social tensions and undermine the Argentine Government’s public finances, which could adversely affect Argentina’s economy and prospects for economic growth.

Government measures, as well as pressure from labor unions, could require salary increases or additional employee benefits, all of which could increase companies’ operating costs.

Most industrial and commercial activities in Argentina are regulated by specific collective bargaining agreements that group together companies according to industry sectors and trade unions. Argentine employers, both in the public and private sectors, have experienced significant pressure from their employees and labor organizations to increase wages and to provide additional employee benefits. Due to the high levels of inflation, employees and labor organizations are demanding wage increases. In the past, the Argentine Government passed laws, regulations and decrees requiring companies in the private sector to maintain minimum wage levels and to provide specified benefits to employees. The Argentine Government increased the minimum salary to AR$3,300 in August 2013, to AR$3,600 in January 2014, to AR$4,400 in September 2014, to AR$5,588 in August 2015, to AR$6,060 in January 2016 and to AR$8,060 in January 2017. From July 1, 2017 and until December 31, 2017, the minimum monthly salary of private employees has been set at AR$8,860. As of January 1, 2018, the minimum monthly salary of private employees is AR$9,500.

In the future, the Argentine Government could take new measures requiring salary increases or additional employee benefits, and the labor force and labor unions may pressure employers to implement those measures. Increases in wages or employee benefits could result in added costs and adversely affect our results of operations in Argentina.

Increased public expenditures could result in long-lasting adverse consequences for the Argentine economy.

In recent years, the Argentine Government has substantially increased public expenditures. Although in 2017, public sector expenditures decreased by 40.4% as compared to 2016, the Argentine Government reported a primary fiscal deficit of 3.9% of GDP, according to the Argentine Ministry of Treasury. Future fiscal deficits could negatively affect the Argentine Government’s ability to access the long-term financial markets and could, in turn, result in more limited access to such markets by Argentine companies, including us.

Restrictions on imports may adversely affect our revenues from cargo operators, as well as our ability to access capital goods that are necessary for our operations.

In 2012, the Argentine Government adopted an import procedure ( declaraciones juradas anticipadas de importación ), pursuant to which local authorities must pre-approve any import of products and services to Argentina as a precondition to allow importers to access the foreign exchange market to pay for such imported products and services. In 2012, the European Union, the United States and Japan filed claims with the World Trade Organization against certain import-related requirements maintained by Argentina. Recently, the World Trade Organization determined that those measures are not consistent with Argentina’s obligations under the World Trade Organization and requested their elimination. On December 22, 2015, through Resolution No. 3,823, the Argentine Federal Administration of Public Income ( Administracion Federal de Ingresos Publicos ) removed the import authorization system and replaced it with the new Comprehensive Import Monitoring System ( Sistema Integral de Monitoreo de Importaciones ). Among other changes, local authorities must now reply to any approval requests within a ten-day period from the date of filing.

If the Argentine Government further modifies the current import regulations and/or restricts the import of certain products, our revenues derived from cargo operations may be adversely affected.

A continued decline in the global prices of Argentina’s main commodity exports could have an adverse effect on Argentina’s economic growth.

Since the beginning of 2015, international commodity prices of Argentina’s primary commodity exports such as soy, wheat and other agricultural products have declined, which has had an adverse effect on Argentina’s economic growth. If international commodity prices continue to decline, the Argentine economy could be adversely affected. In addition, adverse weather conditions can affect the production of commodities by the agricultural sector, which account for a significant portion of Argentina’s export revenues.

These circumstances could have a negative impact on the levels of consumer discretionary spending, government revenues, available foreign exchange and the Argentine Government’s ability to service its sovereign debt, and could generate either recessionary or inflationary pressures, depending on the Argentine Government’s reaction. Any of these results could adversely impact Argentina’s economic growth and our financial condition and results of operations.

The Argentine economy could be adversely affected by economic developments in other global markets and by more general “contagion” effects.

Argentina’s economy is vulnerable to external shocks that could be caused by adverse developments affecting its principal trading partners. A significant decline in the economic growth of any of Argentina’s major trading partners (including Brazil, the European Union, China and the United States) could have a material adverse impact on Argentina’s balance of trade and adversely affect Argentina’s economic growth. Brazilian demand for Argentine exports has generally declined over the past five years and further deterioration of economic conditions in Brazil may increasingly reduce demand for Argentine exports and create advantages for Brazilian imports. Further adverse developments in the Brazilian political and economic crisis may have further negative effects on the Argentine economy and our operations.

Argentina may also be affected by other countries that have influence over world economic cycles. If interest rates rise significantly in developed economies, including the United States, emerging market economies, including Argentina, could find it increasingly challenging and expensive to borrow capital and refinance existing debt, which could negatively affect their economic growth.

Significant fluctuation in the value of the Argentine peso may adversely affect the Argentine economy as well as our financial condition and results of operations.

The Argentine peso has suffered significant declines against the U.S. dollar and has continued to decline against the U.S. dollar. Despite the positive effects of the decline of the Argentine peso on the competitiveness of certain sectors of the Argentine economy, it can also have far-reaching negative impacts on the Argentine economy and on businesses’ and individuals’ financial condition.

After several years of relatively moderate variations in the nominal exchange, the Argentine peso depreciated 14.4% against the U.S. dollar in 2012, 32.6% in 2013, 31.2% in 2014, 52% in 2015, 22.2% in 2016 and approximately 20.3% in 2017. Since the depreciation of the Argentine peso in December 2015, the Argentine Central Bank has allowed the Argentine peso to float and has limited its intervention only to ensure the orderly functioning of the foreign exchange market. As of April 17, 2018, the exchange rate was AR$20.1 to U.S.$1.00. If the peso continues to depreciate, all of the negative effects on the Argentine economy related to such depreciation could resurface. Moreover, it could result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations due to our exposure to financial commitments in U.S. dollars.

International and regional passenger use fees are denominated in U.S. dollars and are payable in both U.S. dollars and Argentine pesos. Currency exchange rate volatility directly affects conversions of U.S. dollars into Argentine pesos. Any appreciation in the value of the Argentine peso against the U.S. dollar may reduce our cash flows. Conversely, any depreciation in the value of the Argentine peso against the U.S. dollar may increase our cash flows.

The overall cost increase of international travel as a result of fluctuations in currency exchange rates could potentially lead to decreased passenger traffic volume as a result of increases in travel costs. A large decrease in the value of a particular foreign currency relative to the value of the Argentine peso or the U.S. dollar, as applicable, could have an adverse effect on the number of international air passengers originating from nations that use such devalued currency.

Continuing high inflation may impact the Argentine economy and adversely affect our results of operations.

Inflation has, in the past, materially undermined the Argentine economy and the Argentine Government’s ability to foster conditions that would permit stable economic growth. In recent years, Argentina has confronted inflationary pressures, evidenced by a significant increase in fuel, energy and food prices, among other factors. According to the most recent publicly available information, the inflation rate was 31.6% for 2015, 41.0% for 2016 and 24.6% for 2017.

High inflation could undermine Argentina’s foreign competitiveness by diluting the effects of the depreciation of the Argentine peso, negatively affecting the level of economic activity and employment, and undermining confidence in Argentina’s banking system, which could further limit the availability of domestic and international financing to businesses. Furthermore, a portion of Argentina’s sovereign debt is subject to adjustment by the Stabilization Coefficient ( Coeficiente de Estabilización de Referencia ), a currency index that is strongly related to inflation. Therefore, any significant increase in inflation could cause an increase in Argentina’s external debt and, consequently, in Argentina’s financial obligations, which could aggravate the pressure on the Argentine economy. If inflation remains high or continues to increase, Argentina’s economy may be negatively affected and our results of operations could be materially affected.

Government intervention in the Argentine economy could adversely affect the economy and our financial condition and results of operations.

During past years, the Argentine Government increased its direct intervention in the economy, including through the implementation of expropriations or nationalizations and price controls. In 2008, the Argentine Government nationalized the Argentine private pension funds ( Administradoras de Fondos de Jubilaciones y Pensiones ) and in April 2012, the Argentine Government nationalized the Argentine energy company Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales .

Although the current administration has not implemented or advocated any nationalization or expropriation measures, similar measures, such as mandatory renegotiation or modification of existing contracts, new taxation policies, changes in laws, regulations and policies affecting foreign trade, investment, among others, that may be adopted by the Argentine Government in the future could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Other Principal Operations and Other Principal Markets in Which We Operate

Italy

Our revenues and operations may be affected if the Ente Nazionale per L’Aviazione Civile (“ENAC”) and the Ministro delle Infrastrutture e Dei Transporti (“MIT”) do not comply with the executed Financing Program Agreement (Contratto Di Programma Quadro Di Finanziamento), to finance the works in the Florence Airport as required by the Florence Airport Master Plan.

On February 16, 2017, TA, MIT and ENAC executed an agreement whereby TA agreed to conduct the works in the Florence Airport master plan. ENAC, together with MIT, agreed to partially finance the works through a €150.0 million financing commitment. If these governmental entities do not provide such financing, the completion of the works at the Florence Airport may be delayed. We may not be able to replace such financing for completion of the works on comparable terms or at all. If any of these situations arise, our results of operations and revenues may be affected.

If the approval process from local and national authorities of the master plan for the Florence Airport is further delayed, our financial results from the operation of such airport will be negatively impacted.

Under the current master plan for the Florence Airport, we are planning to complete certain construction and renovation works. Prior to commencement of such works, we require technical, environmental impact study and urban planning approvals, among others, to be granted by local and national authorities. The approval process is taking longer than initially anticipated and therefore, completion of the projects is also being delayed. Our ability to increase revenues and profits derived from the operation of the Florence Airport will be adversely affected if the approval process is further delayed.

The exercise of the special powers of the Italian Government may restrict our ability to take certain corporate actions or restrict the ability of investors to acquire a significant stake in our share capital.

Certain regulations concerning legal restrictions on transfer of assets of strategic national importance to persons or entities that are not residents of the European Union may apply to us, as controlling shareholder of TA, the operator of our Italian Airports.

Provisions of Law Decree No. 21 of March 15, 2012 (“Law Decree 21/2012”), as converted with amendments into Law No. 56 of May 11, 2012, which granted the Italian Government special powers (the “Golden Powers”), could been triggered as a result of our initial public offering in the event that: (i) we try to transfer our shareholding in TA and/or the Italian Airports; or (ii) a controlling stake of our share capital is transferred to a third party in the future, the Italian Government may exercise its powers under Law Decree 21/2012. Below is a description of the procedure that would apply in such a case. As of the date of this annual report, we are not aware that our initial public offering has indeed triggered any procedures pursuant to Law Decree 21/2012.

Pursuant to current laws and regulations, (i) the approval of specific corporate resolutions by companies operating in the energy, transport, and communications sectors, which are understood to be of strategic importance to the nation, and (ii) the acquisition of significant shareholdings in such companies by investors, are subject to the Golden Powers. Article 2 of Law Decree 21/2012 specifically regulates the special powers of the Italian Government over the strategic assets of companies operating in the transport sector. In particular, these provisions state that, in relation to companies that own one or more of such strategic assets, the Italian Government may:

Article 2 of the Decree of the President of the Italian Republic No. 85 of March 25, 2014 has identified “strategic assets” in the transport industry in Italy as large networks and plants of national interest, intended to ensure the main trans-European corridors and the related conventional reports, including (i) ports of national interest; (ii) airports of national interest; and (iii) national railroad networks of relevance for trans-European networks.

The infrastructure located at our airports in Italy fall within the definition of  “strategic assets” mentioned above.

As a result, our ability to enter into certain commercial transactions (and, in particular, those involving the transfer of the shareholding in TA and/or the strategic assets owned by TA) may be further restricted by the Italian Government’s decision to exercise its Golden Powers with respect to the management of strategic transport assets in Italy. Furthermore, in the future, our or our shareholders’ ability to enter into change of control or takeover transactions may be impacted by the exercise by the Italian Government of its special powers under the Golden Powers rules. In either case, this may limit our ability, as TA’s shareholder, to benefit from the proceeds of certain proposed asset sales or acquisitions or business combinations, and may limit our shareholder’s ability to benefit from possible premiums connected to a proposed change in control transaction or tender offer.

If the Italian Government exercises these Golden Powers in the future with respect to any transaction involving, directly or indirectly, TA and/or the Italian Airports, such exercise could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects in the future.

Volatility in the global financial markets resulting from the recurrence of the Eurozone crisis, geopolitical developments in Eastern Europe or otherwise could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Volatility in the global financial markets could have an adverse effect on the economic recovery in the United States and could result from a number of events, including a relapse in the Eurozone crisis, geopolitical developments in Eastern Europe or otherwise. The effects of the Eurozone crisis, which began in late 2009 as part of the global economic and financial crisis, continued to impact the global financial markets through 2013. Numerous factors continued to fuel the Eurozone crisis, including continued high levels of government debt, the undercapitalization and liquidity problems of many banks in the Eurozone and relatively low levels of economic growth. These factors made it difficult or impossible for some countries in the Eurozone to repay or refinance their debt without the assistance of third parties. As a result of the combination of newly implemented austerity programs, debt write-downs and the European Central Bank’s commitment to restore financial stability to the Eurozone, as well as the finalization of the primary European Stability Mechanism bailout fund, in 2013 and into 2014 interest rates began to fall and share prices began to increase. Although these trends have helped to stabilize the effects of the Eurozone crisis, the underlying causes of the crisis have not been completely eliminated.

In particular, in the second quarter of 2014, Italy’s economy entered a recession for the third time since 2008, underscoring the residual weakness of certain Eurozone economies. In June 2017, the European Central Bank announced that two small local Italian banks, Banca Popolare di Vicenza and Veneto Banca, were failing due to such bank’s reported breach of supervisory capital requirements. While the Single Resolution Board of the European Central Bank elected not to intervene, the Italian Government has decided to provide bailout funds to the two banks in order to protect depositors. Future bank failures in Italy could potentially affect our ability to obtain local financing from local banks in Italy. Furthermore, a weaker economy in Italy may lead to a decrease in air travel and related spending, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If other economies in the Eurozone experience similar trends in the near term, volatility in the global financial markets could return to levels experienced in the peak of the Eurozone crisis, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We intend to transfer our handling and security services from TA to a third party.

We currently directly provide handling and security services at the Florence Airport and Pisa Airport. However, we are in the process of transferring these businesses, services and employees to a third-party service provider. Such transfer or process of transfer could potentially result in either temporary or periodic disruption of operations due to work stoppages, protests or the transferred employees may seek to challenge the legitimacy of the transaction in the courts under applicable Italian law. Any such work stoppages may affect the experience of our passengers at such airports, reduce our revenues or potentially negatively affect their decisions to use such airports in the future.

Coordinating compliance with regulatory obligations may strain our resources and divert management’s attention.

TA is listed on the Milan Stock Exchange. As a public company, TA is subject to the reporting requirements of local regulations in Italy and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations involves our legal and financial compliance costs, makes some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly and increases demand on TA’s systems and resources. Coordination between TA and us to comply with our respective regulatory and filings procedures can be burdensome, divert management’s attention and affect our daily operations and business.

In addition, the interests of TA’s public shareholders may not be the same as the interest of our new public shareholders or the Majority Shareholder. This conflict of interest may affect our operation and business.

The Alitalia Air Company bankruptcy proceeding, or any other bankruptcy proceeding filed by any of the other airlines that service any of the airports we operate, may affect our operations and revenue.

In May 2017, Alitalia Air Company (Società Aerea Italiana or “Alitalia”), filed for bankruptcy for a third time. The Italian Government did not institute a bailout program and is currently undertaking a sales process for Alitalia. Alitalia represented 4.4% of revenue in Italy in 2017 and 0.5% of our consolidated revenue in 2016. If we are unable to replace Alitalia’s business, the financial results and condition of our Italian operations could be adversely affected.

Furthermore, if any of our aeronautical customers were to reduce their use of our airports or cease to operate in them for any reason, including bankruptcy, the remaining airlines may not increase their flight frequency to replace the flights our aeronautical customers were no longer operating, in which case, our business would be adversely affected.

Our organization, management and control model may prove to be inadequate or insufficient pursuant to the requirements of the Italian Legislative Decree 231/2001.

TA is subject to the obligations arising from Legislative Decree No. 231 of June 8, 2001 (“Italian Legislative Decree 231/2001”). Italian Legislative Decree 231/2001 introduced a specific system of enterprise liability for several types of criminal offenses committed in corporate interest and/or to its advantage by persons in senior management positions or those persons’ subordinates.

In compliance with the Italian Legislative Decree 231/2001, TA has adopted and has currently in place an organization, management and control model (the “231 Model”) in order to adopt corporate governance structures and risk prevention systems to stop managers, executives, employees and external collaborators from committing crimes. However, the adoption of a 231 Model does not itself exclude any form of liability under Italian Legislative Decree 231/2001, and failure to update the 231 Model increases the risk that administrative liability under Italian Legislative Decree 231/2001 may arise. If TA’s 231 Model proves to be inadequate or insufficient following a violation committed by any of our managers, executives, employees and/or external collaborators, TA may be subject to pecuniary fines, suspension or revocation of licenses, permits or even disqualification from the public administration registry and prohibition on contracting with Italian public authorities. If any of these situations arises, our operations and business may be significantly affected.

We might be negatively affected by government instability in Italy.

Over the last 67 years, Italy has had 61 different governments. We have no control over and cannot predict the effects of future changes in the Italian Government and the future policies that these new governments may adopt. These developments, as well as potential crises and forms of political instability arising therefrom or any other as of yet unforeseen development, may adversely affect us and the price of our common shares.

Brazil

Officials of the entity that controls Infravix, a former shareholder of ICASGA and ICAB, were found guilty of corruption, money laundering and criminal organization in connection with the Car Wash Affair.

In recent years, the Office of the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor has been conducting various ongoing investigations into allegations of money laundering and corruption in Brazil, including the largest investigation, known as Lava Jato (the “Car Wash Affair”).

In 2014, Engevix (the entity that controlled Infravix, a former shareholder of ICASGA and ICAB) was the subject of investigations and allegations related to the Car Wash Affair. In 2015, Engevix’s executive officers were found guilty and required to pay penalties for corruption, money laundering and criminal organization in connection with Engevix’s engineering and construction companies unrelated to their airport business. According to public sources, these penalties are still under review by local courts in Brazil.

As part of the Brazilian Consolidation, we acquired all of the interests owned by Infravix in Inframerica and in ICAB and, as a result, Infravix is no longer a shareholder in either Inframerica or ICAB. Neither ICAB nor ICASGA have been notified of any investigation against them and, to our knowledge, the investigations of Engevix are related solely to its engineering and construction businesses and not to their investments in either ICAB or ICASGA. However, to the extent any of Engevix’s executive officers are found to have acted illegally in connection with business directly involving ICAB or ICASGA, we could be subject to penalties or reputational harm which, in either case, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We have identified payments made by ICAB that may not have had any proper purpose and that could expose us to fines and sanctions as well as reputational harm and other adverse effects.

We have identified three payments totaling approximately U.S.$250,000 made by ICAB during 2014, when Infravix was still an indirect shareholder of ICAB, to individuals or entities that the press have suggested made illegal payments to government officials on behalf of corporate clients. We have been unable to identify a proper purpose for some of these payments. We may be, but have no official notice that we are, under investigation by Brazilian authorities in connection with these payments. We could be exposed to reputational harm and other adverse effects in connection with these payments. If these payments are ultimately found to have been improper, we could be subject to fines and sanctions, as well as other penalties. Any of the foregoing effects could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The ongoing economic uncertainty and political instability in Brazil may adversely affect our economic and financial condition.

Brazil’s political environment has historically influenced, and continues to influence, the performance of the country’s economy. Political crises have affected and continue to affect the confidence of investors and the general public, which have historically resulted in economic deceleration and heightened volatility in the securities issued by Brazilian companies.

The recent economic instability in Brazil has contributed to a decline in market confidence in the Brazilian economy as well as to a deteriorating political environment. In addition, various ongoing investigations into allegations of money laundering and corruption being conducted by the Office of the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor, including the Car Wash Affair, have negatively affected the Brazilian economy and political environment. Members of the Brazilian Government as well as senior officers of large state-owned companies have faced or are currently facing allegations of corruption and money laundering as a result of the Car Wash Affair. These individuals are alleged to have accepted and/or offered bribes by means of kickbacks on contracts granted by the Brazilian Government to several infrastructure, oil and gas and construction companies. These kickbacks allegedly financed the political campaigns of political parties forming the previous government’s coalition that was led by former President Dilma Rousseff, which funds were unaccounted for or not publicly disclosed. These funds were also allegedly destined toward the personal enrichment of certain individuals. A number of senior politicians, including former president Luiz Inacio da Silva, members of the Brazilian Congress, and high-ranking executive officers of major corporations and state-owned companies in Brazil have been arrested, convicted of various charges relating to corruption, entered into plea agreements with federal prosecutors and/or have resigned or been removed from their positions. The potential outcome of the Car Wash Affair as well as other ongoing corruption-related investigations is uncertain, but they have already had an adverse impact on the image and reputation of those companies that have been implicated as well as on the general market perception of the Brazilian economy, political environment and capital markets. These investigations and allegations may lead to further political and economic instability, and new allegations against government officials may arise in the future.

On April 17, 2016, the Brazilian House of Representatives voted to hold a trial on impeachment charges against former President Rousseff and suspended her from office. President Rousseff was replaced by Vice President Michel Temer, who served as acting President until Ms. Rousseff was impeached and permanently removed from office by the Brazilian Senate on August 31, 2016. While President Temer is expected to serve as President until December 2018, he is currently under investigation for corruption and the Office of the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor is seeking his indictment. Likewise, former president Luiz Inácio da Silva was recently sentenced to 9.5 years in jail for his conviction for corruption and is currently appealing such conviction. He is also subject of several other ongoing criminal investigations. Any of the above factors may create additional political uncertainty, which could have a material adverse effect on the Brazilian economy and, consequently, on our Brazil operations and on us.

We expect to incur losses in our Brazilian operations for the next several years due to the accretion of the financial liability recognized as a result of the fixed concession fee committed.

Under the Brazilian Concession Agreements with the Brazilian Government for the operation of the Brasilia Airport and the Natal Airport (as defined below), we are obligated to pay an annual fixed concession fee which is adjusted for inflation. Initially, we recognized this contractual obligation as a financial liability at fair value in acquisition accounting. Now, we measure the liability at amortized cost using an effective interest rate. Any change in the current market-based discount rate used to discount the estimated cash outflows, as well as an increase in the liability that reflects the passage of time (also referred to as the unwinding of a discount or accretion) is recognized as expense, period over period. During the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we recognized a loss of U.S.$98.1 million, U.S.$107.4 million and U.S.$2.0 million, respectively, relating to these effects. See Note 22 to our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.s. We expect the accretion described above to occur in a similar magnitude in the next several years.

We may not be able to achieve our strategy to expand commercial activities at the Brasilia Airport.

A key part of our strategy to expand and increase our commercial revenues in the Brasilia Airport is the development of an approximately 40,000 square meter gross leasable commercial area connected to the existing terminal, which will also be completely accessible from outside of the passenger departure area. We expect that the total cost of such development will be U.S.$190.0 million. Although ICAB could partner with third parties to complete the investment associated with such expansion, ICAB may elect to fund all or a part of the cost of the development with a mix of cash and financing obtained in the local market. If ICAB provides the capital and the costs of development exceed the current budget, the completion of the construction projects is delayed or the commercial area fails to attract the number of customers that we anticipate, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

The Brazilian Government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy. This involvement, as well as Brazil’s political and economic conditions, could adversely affect us.

The Brazilian Government frequently exercises significant influence over the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations. The Brazilian Government’s actions to control inflation and other policies and regulations have often involved, among other measures, increases in interest rates, changes in tax policies, price controls, foreign exchange rate controls and currency devaluations. We have no control over and cannot predict what measures or policies the Brazilian Government may take in the face of mounting macroeconomic pressures or otherwise. Uncertainty over whether the Brazilian Government will implement changes in policy or regulation in the future may affect economic performance and contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian capital market and securities issued by Brazilian companies. Furthermore, a significant percentage of the revenue of the Brasilia Airport and the Natal Airport derives from the subleasing of rental space within and around the airport. Should such subleases not be renewed given the macroeconomic situation in Brazil, the results of operations of our Brazilian operations could be negatively affected.

Exchange rate instability may have adverse effects on the Brazilian economy and us.

The Brazilian currency has been historically volatile and has been devalued frequently over the past three decades. Throughout this period, the Brazilian Government has implemented various economic plans and used various exchange rate policies, including sudden devaluations, periodic mini-devaluations (during which the frequency of adjustments has ranged from daily to monthly), exchange controls, dual exchange rate markets and a floating exchange rate system. Although long-term depreciation of the Brazilian real is generally linked to the rate of inflation in Brazil, depreciation of the Brazilian real occurring over shorter periods of time has resulted in significant variations in the exchange rate between the Brazilian real, the U.S. dollar and other currencies. The Brazilian real depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 46.6% in 2015, and by 13.7% in 2014. The Brazilian real/U.S. dollar exchange rate reported by the Brazilian Central Bank was R$3.9048 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2015, R$3.2591 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2016 and R$3.3078 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2017, but there can be no assurance that the Brazilian real will not again depreciate against the U.S. dollar or other currencies in the future, which could lead to fluctuations in our consolidated earnings and cash flow as measured in U.S. dollars.

We may not be successful in our claims before the Brazilian National Civil Aviation Agency (Agencia Nacional de Aviação) (“Brazilian ANAC”), and we may not prevail in any arbitration proceeding challenging claims denied by the Brazilian ANAC.

On January 13, 2016, ICAB filed claims before the Brazilian ANAC in the total amount of R$758.0 million (U.S.$253.1 million), requesting the economic re-equilibrium of ICAB’s concession agreement based on, among other things, additional construction works required to complete the terminals and the runway that were not provided for in the concession agreement, and the negative impact of the issuance of new rules and regulations by the Brazilian Ministry of Health, which reduced ICAB’s revenues in connection with the use of the cargo terminal.

In addition, on June 29, 2017, ICAB filed new claims with the Brazilian ANAC in the amount of R$196.8 million (U.S.$61.2 million) requesting the economic re-equilibrium of ICAB’s concession agreement based on, among other things, the loss of revenues as a result of the modification to the rules and regulations affecting the air traffic system at the Congonhas airport. In total, ICAB has claims in the amount of R$734.0 million (U.S.$225.9 million) that were denied by the Brazilian ANAC.

Claims in the amount of R$454.1 million (U.S.$120.2 million) were denied by the Brazilian ANAC, and ICAB expects to initiate an arbitration proceeding with respect to the denied claims. The remaining claims are under review by the Brazilian ANAC.

On December 29, 2015, ICASGA filed claims in the total amount of R$1.0 billion (U.S.$263.1 million) before the Brazilian ANAC requesting the economic re-equilibrium of ICASGA’s concession agreement. In total, ICASGA has claims in the amount of R$957.0 million (U.S.$251.7 million) that were denied by the Brazilian ANAC.

Both ICAB and ICASGA expect to initiate a judicial or an arbitration proceeding with respect to the denied claims.

The failure to recover such claimed amounts could adversely affect our profitability in future periods as a result of not being able to include these amounts in our income or to use the funds for general corporate purposes.

Uruguay

Our revenue derived from the operation of the airports in Uruguay could be adversely affected by the deterioration of neighboring markets.

In 2002, Uruguay experienced its steepest economic and financial crisis in recent history, resulting mostly from external factors. Devaluation in neighboring Brazil in 1999 and recent political and economic crises in Brazil made Uruguayan goods less competitive. Starting in late 2001, an economic crisis in Argentina also undermined Uruguay’s economy. In mid-2002, Argentine withdrawals from Uruguayan banks started a bank run that was overcome only by massive borrowing from international financial institutions, leading in turn to serious debt sustainability problems.

As the number of passengers that use the airports we operate in Uruguay remains highly linked to the numbers of passengers using the airports in Uruguay’s main trading partners, such as Brazil and Argentina, any deterioration of a neighboring market could have a material impact on the number of passenger at our Uruguayan airports which, in turn, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Ecuador

The results of the Ecuadorian presidential elections in April 2017 may create further political instability which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

On April 2, 2017, Lenin Moreno narrowly won the Ecuadorian presidential election by a margin of 3% of votes cast, amid widespread accusations of voting irregularities. Voting officials recounted up to 1.3 million votes, representing 10% of all votes cast, despite opposition leader Guillermo Lasso’s call for a full recount of all votes cast. On August 3, 2017, President Moreno removed Vice President Jorge Glas from office due to his alleged connection to the Car Wash Affair. We have no control over and cannot predict the effects of Lenin Moreno’s administration or policies. These developments, as well as potential crises and forms of political instability arising therefrom or any other as of yet unforeseen development, may adversely affect us.

The ongoing economic uncertainty in Ecuador may adversely affect us.

Ecuador defaulted on a sovereign debt obligation in 2008 and its economic policies have created uncertainty about its future. The Ecuadorian economy is heavily dependent on the oil industry, and the decline of oil prices in 2014 and 2015 had a significant impact on the Ecuadorian economy and its national budget. Due to Ecuador’s dollarized economy, the strength of the U.S. dollar against local currencies of Ecuador’s trading partners has negatively impacted the export sector in Ecuador. All of the foregoing has increased uncertainty as to the future economic conditions in Ecuador which may affect our revenue derived from the Ecuadorian airports. A weaker economy may lead to a decrease in air travel and related spending, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Tensions with Colombia may affect the Ecuadorian economy and, consequently, our results of operations and financial condition in the future.

Diplomatic relations between Ecuador and Colombia have from time to time been tense and affected by events surrounding the Colombian armed forces’ engagement with the Revolutionary Armed Forces ( Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia , known as FARC), particularly on Colombia’s borders with Ecuador. Any future deterioration in relations with Colombia may result in the closing of borders, the imposition of trade barriers or a breakdown of diplomatic ties, any of which could have a negative effect on trade balance, economy and the general security situation, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Armenia

Our operations in Armenia are significantly affected by travel to and from Russia.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 65.0% of the traffic to our airports in Armenia came from Russia. In the last two years, the Russian ruble has experienced significant depreciation against many world currencies. In addition, Russia has been subject, and may be subject in the future, to economic and other sanctions from the United States, other European nations and neighboring countries. Adverse developments relating to and occurring in Russia would have a negative impact on our operations in Armenia.

Armenia’s relations with Azerbaijan may deteriorate.

The dissolution of the Soviet Union, which allowed its constituent republics, including Armenia, to become sovereign nation states, also led other groups to assert claims for independence, sometimes leading to violent clashes. Such clashes have occurred, for example, in Russia’s Chechnya region, in Moldova’s Transdniester region and in Georgia’s Abkhazia and South Ossetia regions.

In December 1991, the population of Nagorno-Karabakh, a predominantly ethnic Armenian enclave on the border of Armenia and Azerbaijan, voted in favor of the establishment of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, now known as the Republic of Artsakh. After a period of armed conflict during which Azerbaijan tried to assert control over the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, a ceasefire was established in 1994 and is currently in force.

Minor skirmishes continue to break out from time to time along the truce line. No country has yet recognized the Republic of Artsakh.

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has had serious repercussions for Armenia, including high cost for the defense of Nagorno-Karabakh. An escalation in hostilities arising from the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh could materially disrupt the Armenian economy (including reducing air traffic to the region), require Armenia to make substantial defense expenditures in the region and have negative consequences for Armenia in its international diplomatic and trade relations, which in turn, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Peru

Construction and improvement works performed at our AAP Airports have not been approved by the Peruvian Government and thus we may not be reimbursed for the investment and expenditures made under the AAP Concession Agreement.

We are currently completing the mandatory construction works necessary for our requesting of reimbursement from the Peruvian Government for the investments we made at the AAP Airports for the construction, improvement, operation and maintenance of such airports. The Peruvian Government has not yet agreed to reimburse us for such investments because the mandatory construction works have not yet been completed. Upon completion of such mandatory construction works and determination of final construction metrics, we will be able to determine the final settlement value of such works and request reimbursement from the Peruvian Government. As of December 31, 2017, there was approximately U.S.$8.2 million in construction works for which we anticipate requesting reimbursement. AAP also registered an intangible asset for U.S.$18.4 million related to these mandatory construction works. However, we may never be reimbursed by the Peruvian Government for the total investment amount, which could affect our results of operation and financial condition .

Risks Related to Our Common Shares

The price of our common shares may be highly volatile.

We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in our common shares will create or be able to maintain an active trading market, or how liquid that market will be in the future. The market price of our common shares may be volatile and may be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:

In addition, the equity markets in general have experienced substantial price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies affected. These broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our common shares, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of certain companies’ securities, securities class action litigation has been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

In the future, we may issue options, restricted shares and other forms of share-based compensation, which have the potential to dilute shareholder value and cause the price of our common shares to decline.

We may offer share options, restricted shares and other forms of share-based compensation to our directors, officers and employees in the future. If any options that we issue are exercised, or any restricted shares that we may issue vest, and those shares are sold into the public market, the market price of our common shares may decline. In addition, the availability of common shares for award under any equity incentive plan we may introduce, or the grant of share options, restricted shares or other forms of share-based compensation, may adversely affect the market price of our common shares.

We have broad discretion in how to use the net proceeds we received from our initial public offering and we may not apply the proceeds to uses with which all our shareholders agree or that produce income.

We have no specific allocation for the net proceeds we received in the initial public offering, and our management retains the right to utilize the net proceeds as it determines. Our management could fail to use the proceeds to effectively continue the growth of our business or to use the proceeds in a manner with which all our shareholders will agree.

You may face future dilution if we issue options to acquire common shares.

We may issue options to acquire common shares. To the extent any such options are issued, there will be dilution to investors in this offering.

A significant portion of our common shares may be sold into the public market in the near future, which could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.

If our directors, executive officers or the Majority Shareholder sell, or indicate an intention to sell, substantial amounts of our common shares in the public market after the lock-up and legal restrictions on resale discussed in this annual report lapse, the trading price of our common stock could substantially decline.

Our officers, directors, and the Majority Shareholder have entered into lock-up agreements with the underwriters under which they have agreed, subject to specific exceptions, not to sell, directly or indirectly, any common shares, including securities that are convertible into common shares and securities that are convertible into, repayable with, exchangeable for or exercisable for common shares, without the permission of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC for a period of 180 days following January 31, 2017. We refer to such period as the “lock-up period.” When the lock-up period expires, we and the other persons subject to the lock-up agreement will be able to sell our common shares in the public market. In addition, pursuant to a registration rights and indemnification agreement, the Majority Shareholder and any affiliate transferees have the right, subject to certain conditions, to require us to register the sale of their common shares under the Securities Act. By exercising their registration rights and selling a large number of shares, our existing owners could cause the prevailing market price of our common shares to decline. The common shares covered by registration rights would represent approximately 82.1% of our outstanding capital stock. Registration of any of these outstanding common shares would result in such shares becoming freely tradable without compliance with Rule 144 upon effectiveness of the registration statement. See “Shares Eligible for Future Sale.” In addition, Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC may, in their sole discretion, release all or some portion of the common shares subject to lock-up agreements at any time and for any reason.

Sales of a substantial number of such common shares upon expiration of the lock-up, the perception that such sales may occur or early release of these agreements could cause our market price to fall or make it more difficult for you to sell your common shares at a time and price that you deem appropriate.

We may need additional capital after this offering and we may not be able to obtain it.

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations, ability to raise financing and the proceeds to us from the initial public offering will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for the foreseeable future. We may, however, require additional cash resources due to changed business conditions or other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. If these resources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain other sources of financing. The sale of additional equity securities could result in dilution to our shareholders. The incurrence of indebtedness could result in increased debt service obligations and could require us to agree to operating and financing covenants that would restrict our operations.

Our ability to obtain additional capital on acceptable terms is subject to a variety of uncertainties, including:

Our business and results of operations may be adversely affected by the increased strain on our resources from complying with the reporting, disclosure and other requirements applicable to public companies in the United States promulgated by the U.S. Government, New York Stock Exchange or other relevant regulatory authorities.

Compliance with existing, new and changing corporate governance and public disclosure requirements adds uncertainty to our compliance policies and increases our costs of compliance. Changing laws, regulations and standards include those relating to accounting, corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing guidelines. These laws, regulations and guidelines may lack specificity and are subject to varying interpretations. Their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. In particular, compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”) and related regulations regarding required assessment of internal controls over financial reporting and our external auditor’s audit of that assessment, requires the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources. Testing and maintaining internal controls can divert our management’s attention from other matters that are important to the operation of our business. We also expect the regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs, making it more difficult to attract and retain qualified officers and members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee, and make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly.

Existing, new and changing corporate governance and public disclosure requirements could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs of compliance as a result of ongoing revisions to such governance standards. Our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. In addition, new laws, regulations and standards regarding corporate governance may make it more difficult for our company to obtain director and officer liability insurance. Further, our board members and senior management could face an increased risk of personal liability in connection with their performance of duties. As a result, we may face difficulties attracting and retaining qualified board members and senior management, which could harm our business. If we fail to comply with new or changed laws or regulations and standards differ, our business and reputation may be harmed.

Due to our recent adoption of IFRS and the Reorganization, our internal controls over financial reporting may not be effective, which could have a significant and adverse effect on our results of operation and financial reporting process.

As we recently adopted IFRS and prepared our first IFRS financial statements in 2016, we have faced many challenging and complex accounting and financial reporting matters. As a private company, except pursuant to contractual obligations, we were not required to produce annual or quarterly periodic reports in the past. Furthermore, in connection with the Reorganization, several businesses that were previously separately operated, albeit under common control, are now unified in their reporting activities for the first time. Many of our financial reporting and internal controls have undergone significant changes in a short period of time. Implementation of our internal control mechanisms and governance might be challenging and complicate our financial reporting process.

In connection with our initial public offering, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. If we identify additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately or timely report our financial results, or prevent fraud, and investor confidence in our company and the market price of our shares may be adversely affected.

In connection with our initial public offering, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) with respect to the accounting for the disposition of subsidiaries at the consolidated level. A “material weakness” is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement in the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. This control deficiency resulted in the restatement of our Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and January 1, 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 for an error related to the release of incorrect amounts of cumulative translation adjustments into earnings upon the disposition of subsidiaries.

We have implemented a remediation plan of the control deficiency that resulted in the material weakness, including performing a risk-assessment process on a regular basis to identify, design, implement and re-evaluate our control activities related to internal control over financial reporting. We cannot assure you that the measures we have taken, and the actions we may take in the future, will be sufficient to remediate the control deficiencies that led to our material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting or that they will prevent potential future material weaknesses. Likewise, if we experience additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately or timely report our financial statement and could also impair our ability to comply with applicable financial reporting requirements and make related regulatory filings on a timely basis.

As a registered public company and as we continue with our activities related to the testing of internal controls, we may identify further internal control issues.

We have begun a more comprehensive review of our internal controls in order to comply with U.S. law requirements, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This review includes an assessment of the design and effectiveness of our internal control environment under the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission framework. We believe that this process will provide consistency in evaluations and verification of the appropriateness and completeness of our activities. We will regularly monitor and report on our review of internal controls to executive officers, our board of directors, our external auditors and to the market, if additional material weaknesses are identified.

As a foreign private issuer, we are not required to comply with attestation reports for the year ended December 31, 2017. However, we intend to evaluate our internal controls over financial reporting in order to allow in future periods management to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to, our internal controls over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder, which we refer to as Section 404. The process of documenting and testing our internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm addressing these assessments. During the course of our testing, we may identify deficiencies of which we are not currently aware.

If we fail to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment, we could suffer material misstatements in our consolidated financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could in turn limit our access to capital markets and lead to a decline in the trading price of our common shares.

If we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting, our independent auditors (when we become subject to Section 404(b)) are unable to provide us with an unqualified report as required by Section 404, or we are required to restate our financial statements, we may fail to meet our public reporting obligations and investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common shares.

Our exemption as a “foreign private issuer” from certain rules under the U.S. securities laws will result in less information about us being available to investors than for U.S. companies, which may result in our common shares being less attractive to investors.

As a “foreign private issuer” in the United States, we are exempt from certain rules under the U.S. securities laws and are permitted to file less information with the SEC than U.S. companies. As a “foreign private issuer,” we are exempt from certain rules under the Exchange Act, that impose certain disclosure obligations and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our common shares. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as companies that are not “foreign private issuers” whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required to comply with Regulation FD promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act, which restricts the selective disclosure of material information. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to information they deem important, which may result in our common shares being less attractive to investors.

As a public company, we may become subject to further compliance obligations, which may strain our resources and divert management’s attention.

As a publicly-traded company, we will incur additional legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, SEC and NYSE rules impose various requirements on public companies, including the establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and changes in corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified people to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as executive officers.

Our ability to pay dividends will be affected by restrictions under Luxembourg law.

Our articles of association and the Luxembourg law of August 10, 1915, on commercial companies as amended from time to time ( loi du 10 août 1915 sur les sociétés commerciales telle que modifiée ), require a general shareholders meeting to approve any dividend distribution except as set forth below.

Our ability to declare dividends under Luxembourg corporate law is subject to the availability of distributable earnings or available reserves, including share premium. Moreover, we may not be able to declare and pay dividends more frequently than annually. As permitted by Luxembourg corporate law, our articles of association authorize the declaration of dividends more frequently than annually by the board of directors in the form of interim dividends so long as the amount of such interim dividends does not exceed total net profits made since the end of the last financial year for which the annual accounts have been approved, plus any profits carried forward and sums drawn from reserves available for this purpose, less the aggregate of the prior year’s accumulated losses, the amounts to be set aside for the reserves required by law or by our articles of association for the prior year, and the estimated tax due on such earnings.

We are a holding company and depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to satisfy our financial obligations and to make dividend payments, which they may not be able to do.

We are a holding company and our subsidiaries conduct all of our operations. We have no relevant assets other than the equity interests in our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to make dividend payments depends on our subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to us. The ability of a subsidiary to make these distributions could be affected by covenants included in most of the concession agreements in which we act as concessionaires, such as the AA2000 Concession Agreement, the Uruguayan Concession Agreements, the Armenian Concession Agreement, the Italian Concession Agreements and the Brazilian Concession Agreements, or by the financing agreements we have entered into, or by the law of their respective jurisdictions of incorporation. See “Description of Indebtedness.” If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, we will be unable to distribute dividends. We do not intend to seek to obtain funds from other sources to pay dividends.

Our shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests than they would as shareholders of a U.S. corporation, which could adversely impact trading in our common shares and our ability to conduct equity financings.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of association and the laws of Luxembourg, including the laws governing stock companies (société anonyme). The rights of our shareholders and the responsibilities of our directors and officers under Luxembourg law are different from those applicable to a corporation incorporated in the United States. In addition, Luxembourg law governing the securities of Luxembourg companies may not be as extensive as those in effect in the United States, and Luxembourg law and regulations in respect of corporate governance matters may not be as protective of minority shareholders as state corporation laws in the United States. Therefore, our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in connection with actions taken by our directors and officers or our principal shareholders than they would as shareholders of a corporation incorporated in the United States.

Neither our articles of association nor Luxembourg law provides for appraisal rights for dissenting shareholders in certain extraordinary corporate transactions that may otherwise be available to shareholders under certain U.S. state laws. As a result of these differences, our shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests than they would as shareholders of a U.S. issuer.

Holders of our common shares may not be able to exercise their pre-emptive subscription rights and may suffer dilution of their shareholding in the event of future common share issuances.

Under Luxembourg law, our shareholders benefit from a pre-emptive subscription right on the issuance of common shares for cash consideration. However, shareholders may, at a general shareholders’ meeting and in accordance with Luxembourg law and our articles of association, waive or suppress and authorize the board to waive, suppress or limit any shareholders’ pre-emptive subscription rights provided by Luxembourg law to the extent the board deems such waiver, suppression or limitation advisable for any issuance or issuances of common shares within the scope of our authorized share capital prior to the pricing for a period of up to five years following the publication of the deed granting such authorization on the Luxembourg Recueil Electronique des Sociétés et Associations (“RESA”) which period may be renewed. Such common shares may be issued above, at or below market value as well as by way of incorporation of available reserves (including premium). In addition, a shareholder may not be able to exercise the shareholder’s pre-emptive right on a timely basis or at all, unless the shareholder complies with Luxembourg corporate law and applicable laws in the jurisdiction in which the shareholder is resident, particularly in the United States. As a result, the shareholding of such shareholders may be materially diluted in the event common shares are issued in the future. Moreover, in the case of an increase in capital by a contribution in kind, no pre-emptive rights of the existing shareholders exist.

We are organized under the laws of Luxembourg and it may be difficult for you to obtain or enforce judgments or bring original actions against us or our executive officers and directors in the United States.

We are organized under the laws of Luxembourg. The majority of our assets are located outside the United States. Furthermore, the majority of our directors and officers and some experts named in this annual report reside outside the United States and a substantial portion of their assets are located outside the United States. Investors may not be able to effect service of process within the United States upon us or these persons or to enforce judgments obtained against us or these persons in U.S. courts, including judgments in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Likewise, it may also be difficult for an investor to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained against us or these persons in courts located in jurisdictions outside the United States, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. It may also be difficult for an investor to bring an original action in a Luxembourg court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us or these persons. Furthermore, Luxembourg law does not recognize a shareholder’s right to bring a derivative action on behalf of the company, except in limited cases. Minority shareholders holding securities entitled to vote at the general meeting and holding at least 10.0% of the voting rights of the company may bring an action against the directors on behalf of the company. Minority shareholders holding at least 10.0% of the voting rights of the company may also ask the directors questions in writing concerning acts of management of the company or one of its subsidiaries, and if the company fails to answer these questions within one month, these shareholders may apply to the Luxembourg courts to appoint one or more experts instructed to submit a report on these acts of management.

As there is no treaty in force on the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters between the United States and Luxembourg, courts in Luxembourg will not automatically recognize and enforce a final judgment rendered by a U.S. court. A valid judgment in civil or commercial matters obtained from a court of competent jurisdiction in the United States may be entered and enforced through a court of competent jurisdiction in Luxembourg, subject to compliance with the enforcement procedures (exequatur). The enforceability in Luxembourg courts of judgments rendered by U.S. courts will be subject prior any enforcement in Luxembourg to the procedure and the conditions set forth in the Luxembourg procedural code, which conditions may include the following as of the date of this annual report (which may change):

We have amended our articles of association and have entered into separate indemnification agreements to indemnify our directors for and hold them harmless against all claims, actions, suits or proceedings brought against them, subject to limited exceptions. The rights and obligations among or between us and any of our current or former directors and officers will be generally governed by the laws of Luxembourg and subject to the jurisdiction of the Luxembourg courts, unless such rights or obligations do not relate to or arise out of their capacities listed above. Although there is doubt as to whether U.S. courts would enforce such provision in an action brought in the United States under U.S. federal or state securities laws, such provision could make enforcing judgments obtained outside Luxembourg more difficult to enforce against our assets in Luxembourg or jurisdictions that would apply Luxembourg law.

Luxembourg insolvency laws may offer our shareholders less protection than they would have under U.S. insolvency laws.

As a company organized under the laws of Luxembourg and with its registered office in Luxembourg, we are subject to Luxembourg insolvency laws in the event any insolvency proceedings are initiated against us including, among other things, Council Regulation (EC) No. 2015/848 of May 20, 2015, on insolvency proceedings. Should courts in another European country determine that the insolvency laws of that country apply to us in accordance with and subject to such EU regulations, the courts in that country could have jurisdiction over the insolvency proceedings initiated against us. Insolvency laws in Luxembourg or the relevant other European country, if any, may offer our shareholders less protection than they would have under U.S. insolvency laws and make it more difficult for them to recover the amount they could expect to recover in a liquidation under U.S. insolvency laws.

Holders generally will be subject to a 15.0% withholding tax on payment of dividend distributions made on the common shares under current Luxembourg tax law.

Under current Luxembourg tax law, payments of dividends made on the common shares generally are subject to a 15.0% Luxembourg withholding tax. Certain exemptions or reductions in the withholding tax may apply, but it will be up to the holders to claim any available refunds from the Luxembourg tax authority. For more information on the taxation implications, see “Taxation—Luxembourg Tax Considerations.”

We are subject to complex tax rules in various jurisdictions, and our interpretation and application of these rules may differ from those of relevant tax authorities, which could result in a liability to material additional taxes, interest and penalties.

We operate in a number of territories, and will accordingly be subject to tax in several jurisdictions. The tax rules to which the Company and its subsidiaries are subject are complex, and we must make judgements (including based on external advice) as to the interpretation and application of these rules. Our tax affairs will in the ordinary course be reviewed by tax authorities. Those tax authorities may disagree with our interpretation and/or application of relevant tax rules. A challenge by a tax authority in these circumstances might require us to incur costs in connection with litigation against the relevant tax authority or reaching a settlement with the tax authority and, if the tax authority’s challenge is successful, could result in additional taxes (perhaps together with interest and penalties) being assessed on us, and as a result an increase in the amount of tax payable by us.

Additionally, dividends and other intra-group payments made by our subsidiaries may be subject to withholding taxes imposed by the jurisdiction in which the entity making the payment is organized or tax resident. Unless such taxes are fully creditable or refundable, dividends and other intra-group payments may increase the amount of tax paid by us. Although the Company and its subsidiaries arrange themselves and their affairs with a view to minimizing the incurrence of such taxes, there can be no assurance that we will succeed.

Holders of our common shares who sell or transfer common shares acquired after January 1, 2018 representing 10% or more of our equity may be subject to Argentine capital gains tax under the new Argentine tax law.

Under the newly enacted Argentine tax law, non-Argentine residents who sell or transfer shares or other participations in foreign entities, which shares were acquired after January 1, 2018, may be subject to capital gains tax in Argentina if 30% or more of the value of the foreign entity is derived from assets located in Argentina and the shares being sold or transferred represent 10% or more of the equity interests of such foreign entity. Therefore, any non-Argentine resident holders of our common shares who sell or transfer common shares acquired after January 1, 2018 and which shares being sold or transferred represent 10% or more of our equity interests, would be subject to the Argentine capital gains tax. See “Taxation—Argentine Tax Considerations.”