AUTOLIV INC (Form: 10-Q, Received: 10/25/2007 15:30:40)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007

Commission File No.: 1-12933

AUTOLIV, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as

specified in its charter)

Delaware		51-0378542
(State or other jurisdic-		(I.R.S. Employer Identi-
tion of incorporation or		fication No.)
organization)

World Trade Center,
Klarabergsviadukten 70,
Box 70381,
SE-107 24 Stockholm, Sweden		N/A
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

+46 8 587 20 600

(Registrant’s telephone number,

including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days.

Yes: [x]

No: [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.

Large accelerated filer: [x]

Accelerated filer: [ ]

Non-accelerated filer [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes: [ ]

No: [x]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of October 22, 2007, there were 75,881,299 shares of common stock of Autoliv, Inc., par value $1.00 per share, outstanding.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-Q contains statements that are not historical facts but rather forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause Autoliv, Inc.’s (“Autoliv”, the “Company”, “we” or “our”) results to differ materially from what is projected. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following: higher raw material costs or other expenses; a major loss of customers; increased competitive pricing pressure; failure to develop or commercialize successfully new products or technologies; the outcome of pending and future litigation and changes in governmental procedures, laws or regulations, including environmental regulations; plant disruptions or shutdowns; labor disputes; product liability and recall issues; and other difficulties in improving margin or financial performance. In addition, the Company's forward-looking statements could be affected by general industry and market conditions and growth rates, general domestic and international economic conditions, including currency exchange rate fluctuations, and other factors. Except for the Company's ongoing obligation to disclose material information under the U.S. federal securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicity and forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information or future events. For any forward-looking statements contained in any document, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

INDEX

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.1 Basis of Presentation

1.2 Receivables

1.3 Inventories

1.4 Restructuring

1.5 Product-Related Liabilities

1.6 Comprehensive Income

1.7 Business Acquisitions

1.8 New Accounting Pronouncements

1.9 Income Taxes

1.10 Retirement Plans

1.11 Contingent Liabilities

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in millions, except per share data)

	Quarter July-September				First nine months January-September
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Net sales
- Airbag products		$1,002.2		$925.8		$3,231.5		$3,030.3
- Seatbelt products		555.0		484.8		1,753.2		1,556.1
Total net sales		1,557.2		1,410.6		4,984.7		4,586.4

Cost of sales		(1,254.9)		(1,132.4)		(4,001.3)		(3,634.9)
Gross profit		302.3		278.2		983.4		951.5

Selling, general & administrative expenses		(84.7)		(79.3)		(270.6)		(242.8)
Research, development & engineering expenses		(93.0)		(94.6)		(314.3)		(307.8)
Amortization of intangibles		(4.9)		(3.7)		(14.5)		(11.3)
Other income (expense), net		(9.7)		1.3		(46.1)		(5.8)
Operating income		110.0		101.9		337.9		383.8

Equity in earnings of affiliates		1.4		1.5		4.7		4.6
Interest income		2.1		1.7		5.9		6.4
Interest expense		(15.2)		(12.2)		(44.7)		(33.8)
Other financial items, net		(3.3)		(1.1)		(6.8)		(3.7)
Income before income taxes		95.0		91.8		297.0		357.3

Income taxes		(29.8)		34.9		(96.5)		(43.9)
Minority interests in subsidiaries		(2.0)		(5.0)		(6.6)		(14.3)
Net income		$63.2		$121.7		$193.9		$299.1

Earnings per share – basic		$0.82		$1.49		$2.46		$3.62
Earnings per share – diluted		$0.81		$1.48		$2.45		$3.60

Weighted average number of shares outstanding, assuming dilution and net of treasury shares (in millions)		77.8		82.1		79.2		83.0

Number of shares outstanding, excluding dilution and net of treasury shares (in millions)		75.9		81.2		75.9		81.2

Cash dividend per share – declared		$0.39		$0.37		$1.17		$1.04
Cash dividend per share – paid		$0.39		$0.35		$1.15		$0.99

See “Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.”

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in millions)

	September 30 2007		December 31 2006
	(unaudited)
Assets
Cash & cash equivalents		$160.1		$168.1
Receivables		1,297.3		1,206.7
Inventories		565.2		545.4
Other current assets		160.8		178.2
Total current assets		2,183.4		2,098.4

Property, plant & equipment, net		1,222.8		1,160.4
Investments and other non-current assets		192.8		175.7
Goodwill assets		1,585.6		1,537.1
Intangible assets, net		139.4		139.2
Total assets		$5,324.0		$5,110.8

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Short-term debt		$330.4		$294.1
Accounts payable		787.6		762.5
Accrued expenses		372.2		270.6
Other current liabilities		226.3		204.4
Total current liabilities		1,716.5		1,531.6

Long-term debt		975.7		887.7
Pension liability		96.6		93.8
Other non-current liabilities		132.4		109.7
Minority interests in subsidiaries		59.3		85.1
Shareholders’ equity		2,343.5		2,402.9
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$5,324.0		$5,110.8

See “Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.”

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in millions)

	Quarter July-September				First nine months January-September
	2007		2006		2007		2006

Operating activities
Net income		$63.2		$121.7		$193.9		$299.1
Depreciation and amortization		77.4		74.1		236.3		222.8
Deferred taxes and other		(6.4)		(2.8)		11.8		(2.0)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		13.9		(91.0)		107.2		(117.2)
Net cash provided by operating activities		148.1		102.0		549.2		402.7

Investing activities
Capital expenditures		(75.4)		(87.6)		(235.6)		(247.7)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		3.2		3.5		7.8		32.9
Acquisitions of businesses and other, net		1.8		6.4		(76.3)		6.8
Net cash used in investing activities		(70.4)		(77.7)		(304.1)		(208.0)

Financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt		14.9		30.3		23.7		(318.6)
Issuance of long-term debt		174.7		28.5		248.4		323.7
Repayments and other changes in long-term debt		(56.0)		-		(193.7)		(158.5)
Dividends paid		(30.6)		(28.7)		(91.2)		(82.1)
Shares repurchased		(160.4)		(52.4)		(257.0)		(155.1)
Stock options exercised		0.9		0.6		8.5		6.1
Minority interests and other, net		(2.8)		(3.1)		(1.3)		(3.4)
Net cash used in financing activities		(59.3)		(24.8)		(262.6)		(387.9)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		5.6		6.6		9.5		29.2
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		24.0		6.1		(8.0)		(164.0)

Cash and cash equivalents at period-start		136.1		125.8		168.1		295.9
Cash and cash equivalents at period-end		$160.1		$131.9		$160.1		$131.9

See “Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.”

KEY RATIOS (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in millions, except per share data)

	Quarter July – September				First nine months January-September
	2007		2006		2007		2006

Earnings per share – basic ¹⁾		$0.82		$1.49		$2.46		$3.62
Earnings per share – diluted ¹⁾		$0.81		$1.48		$2.45		$3.60
Equity per share		$30.88		$29.37		$30.88		$29.37
Cash dividend per share – paid		$0.39		$0.35		$1.15		$0.99
Operating working capital ³⁾		$666		$668		$666		$668
Capital employed		$3,482		$3,352		$3,482		$3,352
Net debt ³⁾		$1,138		$967		$1,138		$967
Net debt to capitalization, % ³⁾⁴⁾		32		28		32		28

Gross margin, % ⁵⁾		19.4		19.7		19.7		20.7
Operating margin, % ⁶⁾		7.1		7.2		6.8		8.4

Return on shareholders’ equity, %		10.6		20.6		10.8		17.0
Return on capital employed, %		12.9		12.5		13.2		15.9

Weighted average no. of shares in millions ¹⁾²⁾		77.8		82.1		79.2		83.0
No. of shares at period-end in millions ⁷⁾		75.9		81.2		75.9		81.2
No. of employees at period-end		35,000		35,400		35,000		35,400
Headcount at period-end		41,500		41,300		41,500		41,300
Days receivables outstanding ⁸⁾		70		83		69		74
Days inventory outstanding ⁹⁾		33		37		33		33

1)	Net of treasury shares
2)	Assuming dilution
3)	See tabular presentation reconciling this non-GAAP measure to GAAP in the Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
4)	Net debt in relation to net debt, minority and equity
5)	Gross profit relative to sales
6)	Operating income relative to sales
7)	Net of treasury shares and excluding dilution
8)	Outstanding receivables relative to average daily sales
9)	Outstanding inventory relative to average daily sales

See “Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements”.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise noted, all amounts are presented in millions of

dollars, except for per share amounts)

September 30, 2007

1.1 Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included in the financial statements. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company adopted FAS-158. Under FAS-158, the actual funded status of retirement benefits are recognized in the financial statements. Unrecognized amounts, such as net actuarial losses, are shown in the Comprehensive Income section of the Shareholders' Equity Statement. The adoption of FAS-158 had no effect on the Company’s consolidated statements of income for 2006 or any prior period presented and will not effect the income statements in future periods. For further information, see Note 18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2006.

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN-48”), on January 1, 2007. Therefore, the method of determining the liability recorded for unrecognized tax benefits has changed and is not comparable with prior years. For further information see Note 1.9 Income Taxes.

The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

The Company's reporting periods consist of thirteen-week periods, ending on the Friday closest to the last day of the calendar month. For convenience, the accompanying financial statements are shown as ending on the last day of the calendar month.

Statements in this report that are not of historical fact are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could affect the actual results of the Company. A description of the important factors that could cause Autoliv's actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this report may be found in Autoliv's reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements, footnotes and definitions thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006.

The Company’s filings with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, proxy statements, management certifications, current reports on Form 8-K and other documents, can be obtained free of charge from Autoliv at the Company’s address. These documents are also available at the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov and at the Company's corporate website at www.autoliv.com.

1.2 Receivables

During the third quarter of 2007, the Company sold receivables relating to selected customers to various external financial institutions without recourse. These factoring agreements have the effect of reducing accounts receivable and days sales outstanding. At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, $86 million and $98 million, respectively, of sold receivables remained outstanding under these agreements.

1.3 Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally FIFO) or market. The components of inventories were as follows, net of reserve:

	September 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
Raw materials		$205.7		$196.4
Work in progress		238.0		234.5
Finished products		121.5		114.5
Total		$565.2		$545.4

1.4 Restructuring

2006

In 2006, the employee-related restructuring provisions mainly related to headcount reductions in high-cost countries. The cash payments mainly related to operations in Europe and Australia for plant consolidation initiated in 2006, as well as in 2005. The change in liability during 2006 includes a resolution of a legal dispute resulting in cash payments. The changes in the reserves have been charged against “Other income (expense), net” in the income statement. The table below summarizes the change in the balance sheet position of the restructuring reserves from December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006.

	Dec. 31 2005		Cash payments		Change in reserve		Translation difference		Dec. 31 2006
Restructuring - employee related		$7.8		$(15.2)		$13.2		$0.6		$6.4
Liability		9.5		(4.5)		(5.3)		0.3		-
Total reserve		$17.3		$(19.7)		$7.9		$0.9		$6.4

During 2006, 938 employees covered by the restructuring reserves left the Company. As of December 31, 2006, 217 employees remained who were covered by the restructuring reserves.

2007

The increase in the employee-related restructuring provisions in the quarter mainly related to operations in high-cost countries. The cash payments mainly related to operations in Europe, USA and Australia for restructuring activities initiated in 2006, as well as in 2005. The change in the reserve has been charged against “Other income (expense), net” in the income statement. The table below summarizes the change in the balance sheet position of the restructuring reserves from December 31, 2006 to March 31, 2007.

Dec. 31

2006

Cash

payments

Change in

reserve

Translation

difference

Mar. 31

2007

Restructuring - employee related

$6.4

$(1.6

)

$0.6

$0.0

$5.4

During the quarter, 71 employees covered by the reserves left the Company. As of March 31, 2007, 179 employees remained who were covered by the restructuring reserves.

The increase in the employee-related restructuring provisions in the quarter mainly relates to operations in high-cost countries. The cash payments mainly relate to operations in Canada, USA, Sweden and Australia for restructuring activities initiated in 2007, 2006 and 2005. The change in the reserve has been charged against “Other income (expense), net” in the income statement. The table below summarizes the change in the balance sheet position of the restructuring reserves from March 31, 2007 to June 30, 2007.

Mar. 31

2007

Cash

payments

Change in

reserve

Translation

difference

Jun. 30

2007

Restructuring - employee related

$5.4

$(4.0

)

$5.8

$0.3

$7.5

During the quarter, 210 employees covered by the reserves left the Company. As of June 30, 2007, 274 employees remained who were covered by the restructuring reserves.

Jun. 30

2007

Cash

payments

Change in

reserve

Translation

difference

Sep. 30

2007

Restructuring - employee related

$7.5

$(5.8

)

$6.6

$0.0

$8.3

During the quarter, 225 employees covered by the reserves left the Company. As of September 30, 2007, 334 employees remained who were covered by the restructuring reserves.

1.5 Product-Related Liabilities

The Company maintains reserves for product risks. Such reserves relate to product performance issues, including recall, product liability and warranty issues. The Company records liabilities for product-related risks when probable claims are identified and it is possible to reasonably estimate costs. Provisions for warranty claims are estimated based on prior experience, likely changes in performance of newer products and the mix and volume of the products sold. The provisions are recorded on an accrual basis. Cash payments have been made, in the past, for recall and warranty-related issues in connection with a variety of different products and customers. For further explanation, see Note 1.11 Contingent Liabilities below.

The table below summarizes the change in the balance sheet position of the product-related liabilities for the quarter.

Quarter

July-September

Nine months

January-September

2007

2006

2007

2006

Reserve at beginning of the period

$21.7

$26.0

$22.8

$33.3

Change in reserve

(0.2)

2.7

4.3

4.4

Cash payments

(2.8)

(5.5)

(8.7)

(16.1)

Translation difference

0.8

1.1

1.6

Reserve at end of the period

$19.5

$23.2

$19.5

$23.2

1.6 Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income includes net income for the year and items charged directly to equity.

Quarter

July – September

Nine months

January – September

2007

2006

2007

2006

Net income ¹⁾

$63.2

$121.7

$193.9

$299.1

Pension liability ²⁾

0.2

(0.2)

0.3

(0.5)

Fair value of derivatives

(0.1)

(0.3)

(1.3)

Translation of foreign operations

41.3

72.1

17.8

Other comprehensive income

41.4

(0.5)

72.4

16.0

Comprehensive income ¹⁾

$104.6

$121.2

$266.3

$315.1

1) For additional information, see the Management's Discussion and Analysis net income discussion and the caption Items Affecting Comparability and Part II – Other Information, Item 1 below 2) During the quarter and the first nine months 2006, the adjustment charged directly to equity was related to Minimum pension liability.

1.7 Business Acquisitions

On January 15, 2007, Autoliv Inc. acquired the remaining 35% of the shares in its Korean subsidiary Autoliv-Mando, an entity which already had been a consolidated entity, for $80 million.

1.8 New Accounting Pronouncements

The following accounting pronouncements have been issued and will be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2008:

Statement No.157, Fair Value Measurements (“FAS-157”), establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, clarifies the definition of fair value within that framework, and expands disclosures about the use of fair value measurements. FAS-157 was issued in September 2006 and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company has not yet completed the evaluation of the effects on earnings and financial position that may result from the adoption of FAS-157. The Company will adopt FAS-157 prospectively on January 1, 2008.

Statement No.159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“FAS-159”), provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The objective of FAS-159 is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. FAS-159 was issued in February 2007 and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company has not yet completed the evaluation of the effects on earnings and financial position that may result from the adoption of FAS-159.

1.9 Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2007 was 32.5%, compared with 12.3% in the first nine months of 2006. During the third quarter of 2006, the Company recognized a non-cash income tax benefit of $57 million resulting from the release of income tax reserves associated with the U.S. income tax audit examination cycle. In addition, during the second quarter of 2006, several subsidiaries recorded adjustments to their estimates of prior year income tax provisions. During the first quarter of 2006, several subsidiaries completed studies of R&D tax credit eligibility and recorded a 2005 catch-up effect entirely in that quarter. These catch-up effects in the first three quarters of 2006 caused an approximately 20% reduction to the effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2006.

The Company files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction, and various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to income tax examination by the U.S. federal tax authorities for years prior to 2003. With few exceptions, the Company is also no longer subject to income tax examination by U.S. state or local tax authorities for tax years prior to 2003. In addition, with few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to income tax examinations by non-U.S. tax authorities for years before 2001. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) began an examination of the Company’s 2003-2005 U.S. income tax returns in the second quarter of 2006 that is anticipated to be completed in early 2008. In addition, the Company is undergoing tax audits in several non-U.S. jurisdictions covering multiple years. As of September 30, 2007, as a result of those tax examinations, the Company is not aware of any material proposed income tax adjustments. The Company expects the completion of certain tax audits in the near term and believes that it is reasonably possible that some portion of reserves could be released into income in some future period or periods.

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN-48”), on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN-48, the Company recognized a decrease of $9.9 million in the liability recorded for unrecognized tax benefits as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, which was accounted for as an increase to the January 1, 2007 balance in retained earnings. The Company recognizes interest and potential penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. The Company had approximately $6.7 million accrued for the payment of interest and penalties as of September 30, 2007. As of January 1, 2007, the Company had recorded approximately $39.6 million for unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest and penalties, related to prior years. During the third quarter of 2007, the Company recorded a net decrease of $0.2 million to income tax reserves for unrecognized tax benefits based on tax positions related to the current and prior years and interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits of prior years, for a total of $3.9 million accrued year to date 2007. Substantially all of these reserves would impact the effective tax rate if released into income. Of the total unrecognized tax benefits recorded at September 30, 2007, $25.9 million is classified as current tax payable and $17.6 million is classified as non-current tax payable on the balance sheet. Prior to the adoption of FIN-48, at December 31, 2006, all unrecognized tax benefits were classified as current tax payable.

1.10 Retirement Plans

The Company has non-contributory defined benefit pension plans covering employees at most operations in the United States. Benefits are based on an average of the employee’s earnings in the years preceding retirement and on credited service. Certain supplemental unfunded plan arrangements also provide retirement benefits to specified groups of participants.

The Company has frozen participation in the U.S. pension plans to include only those employees hired as of December 31, 2003. The U.K. defined benefit plan is the most significant non-U.S pension plan and participation was frozen for all employees hired after April 30, 2003.

The Net Periodic Benefit Costs related to Other Post-retirement Benefits were not significant to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 or September 30, 2006.

The Net Periodic Benefit Cost increased by $2.2 million (excluding payroll tax) during 2007 due to pension benefits that became fully accrued when Mr. Lars Westerberg retired as President and Chief Executive Officer of Autoliv Inc. on April 1, 2007, instead of June 2008 as originally planned. These pension costs are reported as Special Termination Benefit Cost for the nine month period presented in the table below.

For further information on Pension Plans and Other Post-retirement Benefits, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006.

The components of the total Net Periodic Benefit Cost associated with the Company’s defined benefit retirement plans are as follows:

	Quarter July - September				Nine months January – September
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Service cost		$3.8		$3.8		$11.6		$11.4
Interest cost		3.5		3.0		10.4		8.9
Expected return on plan assets		(2.9)		(2.8)		(8.7)		(8.4)
Amortization of prior service cost		-		-		0.1		0.1
Amortization of net (gain) loss		0.4		0.6		1.3		1.8
Special termination benefit		0.1		-		2.2		-

Net Periodic Benefit Cost		$4.9		$4.6		$16.9		$13.8

1.11 Contingent Liabilities

Product Warranty and Recalls

Autoliv is exposed to product liability and warranty claims in the event that its products fail to perform as expected and such failure results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury and/or property damage. The Company may experience material warranty or product liability losses in the future and may incur significant costs to defend such claims. In addition, if any of Autoliv’s products are or are alleged to be defective Autoliv may be required to participate in a recall involving such products. Each vehicle manufacturer has its own practices regarding product recalls and other product liability actions relating to its suppliers. As suppliers become more integrally involved in the vehicle design process and assume more of the vehicle assembly functions, vehicle manufacturers are increasingly looking to their suppliers for contribution when faced with recalls and product liability claims. A recall claim or a product liability claim brought against Autoliv in excess of available insurance may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Vehicle manufacturers are also increasingly requiring their outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their products and bear the costs of repair and replacement of such products under new vehicle warranties. A vehicle manufacturer may attempt to hold Autoliv responsible for some or all of the repair or replacement costs of defective products under new vehicle warranties, when the product supplied did not perform as represented. Accordingly, the future costs of warranty claims by customers may be material. However, Autoliv believes its established reserves are adequate to cover potential warranty settlements. Autoliv’s warranty reserves are based upon the Company’s best estimates of amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims. The Company regularly evaluates the appropriateness of these reserves, and adjusts them when appropriate. However, the final amounts determined to be due related to these matters could differ materially from the Company’s recorded estimates.

The table in Note 1.5 Product-Related Liabilities above summarizes the change in the balance sheet position of the product related liabilities from December 31, 2006 to September 30, 2007.

Legal Disputes

Litigation in United States (Autoliv ASP, Inc.)

In December 2003, a United States Federal District Court awarded a former supplier of Autoliv ASP, Inc., a subsidiary of Autoliv Inc., approximately $27 million plus pre-judgment interest in connection with a commercial dispute that related to purchase commitments. Autoliv appealed the verdict and the supplier cross-appealed in regard to the calculation of the amount of pre-judgment interest. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on August 7, 2006, affirmed the judgment of the district court on certain appeal issues, vacated the district court’s decision on certain other appeal issues and remanded the case for the district court to reconsider, and finally adjusted the district court’s calculations of pre-judgment interest. On November 29, 2006, the United States Federal District Court amended the judgment by increasing the pre-judgment interest to approximately $7 million and denied Autoliv’s motion for vacatur. Autoliv appealed the decision and on July 11, 2007 the United States Federal Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the judgment entered against Autoliv ASP, Inc. Autoliv’s subsequent motion for rehearing was denied and on October 4, 2007, Autoliv, being granted leave to do so on its own application, deposited approximately $36 million with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to be distributed by the district court among the plaintiffs.

When depositing the above amount, Autoliv calculated the post-judgment interest through October 2, 2007 to be approximately $1.8 million, which amount is included in the amount deposited. In a motion filed with the district court on October 10, 2007, the plaintiffs have argued that the interest should be approximately $6.6 million, or approximately $4.9 million more than Autoliv calculated. A hearing was held before the district court on October 25th, 2007, during which the district court ruled, consistent with Autoliv's position, that pre-judgment interest should accrue until December 4, 2003, and that post-judgment interest should accrue in accordance with the federal statute thereafter and until satisfaction of the judgment. The plaintiffs may appeal the ruling.

For additional information, see the caption Items Affecting Comparability, Item 2, and Part II – Other Information, Item 1 below .

Litigation in France (Autoliv Holding Limited)

In 1997, Autoliv AB acquired Marling Industries plc (“Marling”). Marling was at that time involved in a litigation relating to the disposition of a French subsidiary of Marling in 1992. The acquirer of the French subsidiary claims that a trademark, which was sold to a UK subsidiary of Marling prior to the sale of the French subsidiary, should have been included in the sale. The UK subsidiary was sold by Marling prior to the acquisition of Marling by Autoliv AB.

In May 2006, a French court ruled that the agreement whereby Marling’s French subsidiary had transferred the trademark to Marling’s UK subsidiary was invalid and that Marling (now named Autoliv Holding Limited) had fraudulently failed to disclose the previous sale of the trademark to the acquirer of the French subsidiary. The court also appointed an expert to assess the losses suffered by the acquirer of the French subsidiary. The acquirer of the French subsidiary has made claims for damages of €40 million ($57 million) but has not yet provided the court appointed expert with the materials needed to substantiate its claims.

Autoliv Holding Limited and Autoliv AB have appealed against the May 2006 court decision. No decision on this appeal is expected before the end of 2008. While legal proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainty, Autoliv Holding Limited and Autoliv AB believe they have meritorious grounds for their appeal. Given the status of the claim, and the failure of the plaintiff to substantiate its claims, it is in the opinion of the Company’s management not possible to give any meaningful estimate of any financial impact that may arise from the claim at this time.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes thereto included elsewhere herein and with our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on February 28, 2007. Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions.

Autoliv is the world's largest automotive safety system supplier with sales to all the leading vehicle manufacturers in the world. Autoliv develops, markets and manufactures airbags, seatbelts, safety electronics, steering wheels, anti-whiplash systems, child safety as well as night vision systems and other active safety systems. Autoliv accounts for more than one third of its market. Autoliv has manufacturing facilities in 28 vehicle-producing countries.

Autoliv is a Delaware holding corporation with principal executive offices in Stockholm, Sweden, which owns two principal subsidiaries, Autoliv AB ("AAB") and Autoliv ASP, Inc. ("ASP"). AAB, a Swedish corporation, is a leading developer, manufacturer and supplier to the automotive industry of car occupant restraint systems. Starting with seat belts in 1956, AAB expanded its product lines to include seat belt pretensioners (1989), frontal airbags (1991), side-impact airbags (1994), steering wheels (1995) and seat sub-systems (1996). ASP, an Indiana corporation, pioneered airbag technology in 1968 and has since grown into one of the world's leading producers of airbag modules and inflators. ASP designs, develops and manufactures airbag inflators, modules and airbag cushions, seat belts and steering wheels. It sells inflators and modules for use in driver, passenger, side-impact and knee bolster airbag systems for worldwide automotive markets.

Shares of Autoliv common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "ALV" and Swedish Depositary Receipts representing shares of Autoliv common stock trade on the OMX Nordic Exchange in Stockholm under the symbol "ALIV". Options in Autoliv shares are traded in Philadelphia and AMSE under the symbol "ALV".

Non-GAAP financial measures

Some of the following discussions refer to non-GAAP financial measures: see "Organic sales", "Operating working capital", "Net debt", "Leverage ratio" and "Interest coverage ratio". Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures assist investors in analyzing trends in the Company's business. Investors should consider these non-GAAP financial measures in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, financial reporting measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures have been identified as applicable in each section of this report with a tabular presentation reconciling them to GAAP. It should be noted that these measures, as defined, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 COMPARED WITH THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

Market overview

During the third quarter 2007, global light vehicle production is estimated by CSM and J.D. Power to have increased by nearly 8% compared to the same quarter 2006. At the beginning of the quarter, global light vehicle production was expected to grow by 7%.

In Europe (including Eastern Europe), where Autoliv generates more than half of its revenues, light vehicle production is estimated to have risen by 8% which was 3 percentage points better than expected. At the beginning of the quarter, light vehicle production in Western Europe was expected to be flat, while it now is reported to have increased by 4%. Light vehicle production in Eastern Europe rose by 20%, as expected.

In North America , which accounts for approximately one quarter of Autoliv’s consolidated revenues, light vehicle production increased by 4%. GM, Ford and Chrysler (“the Detroit 3”) reduced their production by less than 1% compared to an expected increase of 2%, while the Asian and European vehicle manufacturers increased their North American production by almost 13%, as expected.

In Japan , which accounts for one tenth of Autoliv’s consolidated sales, light vehicle production decreased by 1% compared to an expected increase of 1%.

In the Rest of the World (RoW) light vehicle production is estimated to have risen by 16%, primarily due to a 23% increase in China.

Autoliv’s market is driven not only by vehicle production but also by the fact that new vehicle models are being equipped with more airbags and other safety systems, often in response to new regulations. An important example of such regulation was provided in September when the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) released new stringent crash test criteria that will, in effect, mandate head curtain airbags and chest side airbags on all new light vehicles within the next five years.

Consolidated Sales

The Company has substantial operations outside the United States and currently approximately 75% of its sales are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. This makes the Company and its performance in regions outside the United States sensitive to changes in U.S dollar exchange rates. The measure “Organic sales” presents the increase or decrease in the Company’s overall U.S. dollar net sales on a comparative basis, allowing separate discussion of the impacts of acquisitions/divestments and exchange rate fluctuations. The tabular reconciliation below presents the change in “Organic sales” reconciled to the change in the total net sales as can be derived from our unaudited financial statements.

	Reconciliation of the change in “Organic sales” to GAAP financial measure
	Components of net sales increase (decrease) Quarter July - September, 2007 (Dollars in millions)
	Europe			North America			Japan			RoW			Total
		%	$		%	$		%	$		%	$		%	$
Organic sales change		4.6	33.2		1.9	7.5		17.0	22.4		13.1	20.3		5.9	83.4
Impact of acquisitions/ divestments		-	-		-	-		-	-		-	-		-	-
Effect of exchange rates		7.8	56.0		0.0	0.2		(1.4)	(1.7)		5.6	8.7		4.5	63.2

Reported net sales change		12.4	89.2		1.9	7.7		15.6	20.7		18.7	29.0		10.4	146.6

During the third quarter 2007, Autoliv’s consolidated net sales rose by more than 10% to $1,557 million compared to the third quarter 2006. Excluding currency translation effects of 4%, organic sales (i.e. sales excluding currency translation effects, and acquisitions/divestitures) grew by 6%. At the beginning of the quarter, organic sales were anticipated to grow by 4%. However, light vehicle production in Western Europe has been stronger than expected.

Growth in Autoliv’s organic sales of 6% was driven by strong performance in seatbelts, due to the introduction of active seatbelts and higher global light vehicle production. Organic sales were also driven by higher penetration of curtain airbags and other side protection systems into an increasing number of new vehicle models, and by market share gains in safety electronics. Sales grew organically in all regions and particularly for customers such as BMW, Nissan and Mitsubishi. Additionally, sales to the Chinese manufacturers Brilliance-Jinbei and Chery grew the fastest, albeit from low levels.

Sales by Product

Sales of airbag products (including steering wheels and electronics) increased by 8% to $1,002 million, including currency effects of 4%. Organic sales growth of 4% was due to higher penetration rates of curtain airbags (organic sales up 12%) and other side airbags (up 8%) into an increasing number of vehicle models. Increased market share for safety electronics (organic sales up 16%) and steering wheels (up 10%) also contributed to the performance, while sales of frontal airbags declined due to intensive price competition.

Sales of seatbelt products (including seat sub-systems) rose by 15% to $555 million. Excluding currency effects of 6%, organic sales grew by 9% due to the introduction of more sophisticated seatbelt systems and to the strong global light vehicle production.

Sales by Region

Sales from Autoliv’s European companies rose by 12% to $811 million. Excluding currency effects of 8%, sales grew organically by 4%. This increase reflects the introduction of active seatbelts with electric pretensioners and of the demand for seatbelts with pyrotechnic pretensioners. Sales were also affected by the booming vehicle production in Eastern Europe and by Autoliv’s market share gains in steering wheels. Additionally, sales were driven by the introduction of curtain airbags into such models as BMW’s Mini and Clubman; Ford’s Galaxy and Mondeo; Kia’s Cee’d; Mercedes C- and E-class; Nissan’s Qashqai; Peugeot’s 207; Renault’s Laguna 3; Volvo’s C30 and V70 and Volkswagen’s Tiguan . Sales of frontal airbags declined primarily due to pricing pressure from customers.

Sales from Autoliv’s North American companies increased by 2% to $409 million. Sales were driven by the introduction and higher penetration of head curtain airbags (up 23%) and by market share gains in safety electronics (up 20%). Sales of frontal airbags were negatively impacted by pricing pressure and the expiration of certain contracts. Autoliv’s strong performance in curtain airbags was driven by new business for BMW’s X5; Buick’s Enclave; Chevrolet’s Express and Silverado; Chrysler’s Sebring, Avenger, Compass and Patriot; GMC’s Acadia; Nissan’s Altima, Centra and Versa; and Saturn’s Outlook and Vue.

Sales from Autoliv’s companies in Japan increased by 16% to $153 million despite negative currency effects of 1%. Organic growth of 17% compares favorably with the 1% decline in Japanese vehicle production. Organic growth was recorded in all product lines and was particularly strong in seatbelts due to new business with Honda. Sales of head curtain airbags rose organically by 25%, primarily due to new business and higher production of Mazda’s Axela; Mitsubishi’s Outlander; Nissan’s X-trail and Toyota’s Rav4 and MarkX.

Sales from Autoliv’s companies in the Rest of the World (RoW) rose by 19% to $184 million. Excluding currency effects of 6%, sales grew organically by 13%. Organic sales were driven by strong vehicle production in China and other Asian countries. This was primarily the result of vigorous sales of seatbelts (up 16% organically), as well as of steering wheels and safety electronics, albeit from previously low levels. The demand was particularly strong in China (up 20%), partially as a result of sales to Brilliance-Jinbei’s Junjie; Chery’s A; Citroën’s C4; Ford’s Mondeo; Mazda’s Axela, Peugeot’s 307, Saic’s R-75 and Skoda Octavia.

Earnings for the Three-Month Period Ended September 30, 2007

Prices for raw materials remain at near record levels. Consequently, many Autoliv component suppliers continue to be squeezed between high raw material prices and the constant pricing pressure in the automotive industry. This squeeze has forced Autoliv to incur additional costs of approximately $5 million during the quarter for raw materials and financially distressed suppliers. In addition, sales are growing particularly fast for products with relatively higher component costs. As a result, gross margin in the third quarter declined to 19.4% from 19.7% for the same period 2006. Despite this margin pressure, gross profit improved by $24 million or 9% to $302 million. This improvement was due primarily to higher organic sales and currency effects.

Operating income rose by 8% or $8 million to $110 million, while operating margin was virtually unchanged at 7.1% despite 0.7 percentage points higher other operating expenses than in the same quarter 2006. These operating expenses rose by $11 million to $10 million, primarily as a result of stepped-up restructuring activities. Both Selling, General and Administrative expense (S,G&A) and Research, Development and Engineering expense (R,D&E) declined as a percentage of sales to 5.4% and 6.0%, respectively, from 5.6% and 6.7% during the same quarter 2006. At the beginning of the quarter, operating margin was expected to reach approximately 7.0%.

Income before taxes increased by 3% or $3 million to $95 million. The $8 million improvement in operating income was partially offset by $3 million higher interest expense as a result of higher market interest rates and higher average net debt, primarily due to the share repurchase program and the acquisition in January of the remaining shares in Autoliv-Mando in Korea (“the Mando Acquisition”). Additionally, costs for Other financial items rose due to factoring and negative currency effects on certain non-U.S. dollar loans.

Net income amounted to $63 million compared to $122 million for the same quarter 2006, when net income was boosted by the release of tax reserves and by other discrete tax items. Excluding this effect of $66 million, net income rose by 13% or $7 million as a result of higher income and a lower underlying effective tax rate. The effective tax rate was 31.4%, while the effective tax rate in the same quarter 2006 was a positive 38.0%. This was due to the income from the release of tax reserves and other discrete tax items.

Earnings per share amounted to 81 cents compared to $1.48 reported for the third quarter 2006, a decrease of 67 cents. The third quarter 2006 included discrete tax items that had a positive impact of 80 cents per share. Excluding these items there was an improvement this year of 13 cents per share, primarily the result of 6 cents from the stock repurchase program and 5 cents from currency effects. The average number of shares outstanding decreased by 5% to 77.8 million.

Return on capital employed improved slightly to 13%, while return on equity declined to 11% from 21%. However, in the third quarter last year, return on equity was boosted by 11 percentage points by the release of tax reserves and other discrete tax items.

During the quarter, operating income was negatively affected by employee-related expenses of $6.6 million in connection with restructuring of (mainly textile) operations in high-cost countries. During the quarter, 225 employees covered by the restructuring reserves left the Company.

NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 COMPARED WITH NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

Market overview

During the nine-month period January - September 2007, global light vehicle production is estimated to have increased by nearly 5%, but only 2% in the Triad where Autoliv derives almost 90% of its sales.

In Europe , light vehicle production is estimated to have increased 6%, primarily due to an 18% growth in Eastern Europe. The increase in Western Europe was 2%.

In North America , light vehicle production declined by 2% due to GM, Ford and Chrysler cutting back their production by 8%.

In Japan , light vehicle production was flat for the nine-month period.

In the Rest of the World , light vehicle production is estimated to have risen by 12%.

Consolidated Sales

The Company has substantial operations outside the United States and currently approximately 75% of its sales are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. This makes the Company and its performance in regions outside the United States sensitive to changes in U.S dollar exchange rates. The measure “Organic sales” presents the increase or decrease in our overall U.S. dollar net sales on a comparative basis, allowing separate discussion of the impacts of acquisitions/divestments and exchange rate fluctuations. The tabular reconciliation below presents the change in “Organic sales” reconciled to the change in the total net sales as can be derived from our unaudited financial statements.

	Reconciliation of the change in “Organic sales” to GAAP financial measure
	Components of net sales increase (decrease) First nine months, 2007 (Dollars in millions)
	Europe				North America					Japan						RoW				Total
	%		$			%	$				%		$				%	$			%	$
Organic sales change		3.1		74.1		1.4		17.8			11.5			47.1			11.1		52.5		4.2	191.5
Impact of acquisitions/ divestments		-		-		-		-			-			-			-		-		-	-
Effect of exchange rates		8.1		196.2		0.0		(0.4	)		(3.0	)		(12.2	)		4.9		23.2		4.5	206.8

Reported net sales change		11.2		270.3		1.4		17.4			8.5			34.9			16.0		75.7		8.7	398.3

For the year’s first nine months, sales increased by 9% to $4,985 million, including currency translation effects of 5%. Organic sales growth of 4% were driven by strong performance in seatbelts, partially as a reflection of the introduction of active seatbelts with electric pretensioners and of the demand for seatbelts with pyrotechnic pretensioners. Sales were also affected by the booming vehicle production in emerging markets and strong demand for curtain airbags and higher market share for steering wheels and safety electronics.

Sales by Product

Sales of airbag products increased by 7% to $3,232 million. Excluding currency effects of 4%, organic sales grew by 3% due to strong curtain airbags sales, partially offset by declines in frontal airbags.

Sales of seatbelt products increased by 13% to $1,753 million including 6% from currency effects. The 7% increase in organic sales reflects strong vehicle production in Asia Pacific and Eastern Europe, and rapidly increasing demand for pretensioners and active seatbelts.

Sales by Region

Sales from Autoliv’s European companies increased by 11% to $2,685 million of which 8% was due to currency effects. Organic growth of 3% was less than the increase in European vehicle production due to the fact that production in Eastern Europe grew much faster than in Western Europe which has higher safety content per vehicle.

Sales from Autoliv’s North American companies increased by 1% to $1,304 million despite the 2% decline in the region’s light vehicle production. This was due to strong demand for side curtain airbags and market share gains in safety electronics.

Sales from Autoliv companies in Japan increased by 9% to $446 million despite a 3% negative currency effect. Growth in organic sales of 12% was significantly stronger than light vehicle production in Japan which stood virtually unchanged.

Sales from Autoliv companies in the Rest of the World rose by 16% to $550 million including currency effects of 5%. Growth in organic sales of 11% was driven by all product lines supported by an increase of roughly the same magnitude in light vehicle production in the region.

Earnings for the Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2007

Gross profit increased by 3% or $32 million to $983 million on higher sales. However, gross margin decreased to 19.7% from 20.7% as a result of higher direct cost and pricing pressure from customers.

Operating income declined by 12% or $46 million to $338 million. Of the decline, 8 percentage points were due to a $30 million increase in legal reserves (see significant events) and 4 points or $16 million to other factors, including $28 million higher S,G&A expense. Operating margin declined from 8.4% to 6.8% and to 7.4% excluding the increase in legal reserves (see table for this non-U.S. GAAP measure). Most of the latter decline was caused by lower gross margin and higher S,G&A.

Income before taxes declined by 17% or $60 million to $297 million. Of the decrease, 8 percentage points were due to the increase in legal reserves and 9 points or $30 million to other factors, including $11 million in higher net interest due to higher market interest rates and higher average net debt as a result of stock buybacks and the Mando acquisition.

Net income decreased by 35% or $105 million to $194 million. Of the decrease, 24 percentage points were due to the $71 million release of tax reserves and other discrete tax items in 2006, 7 percentage points were due to the increase in legal reserves, and 4 points or $14 million to other factors. The Mando acquisition had a favorable effect of $8 million by reducing the minority interest. The effective tax rate rose to 32.5 % from 12.3% primarily due to discrete tax items in 2006.

Earnings per share declined by $1.15 to $2.45 and to $2.71 excluding the 26 cent effect of the increase in legal reserves Earnings per share was also negatively impacted by 46 cents from lower underlying net income and by 89 cents from the year-over-year change in discrete tax items. The stock repurchase program had a favorable effect of 11 cents and currency effects of 10 cents . The average number of shares outstanding decreased by 5% to 79.2 million.

ITEMS AFFECTING COMPARABILITY

The following items have significantly affected the comparability of reported results from year to year. Management believes that, to assist in understanding the Company's operations, it is useful to consider certain U.S. GAAP measures exclusive of these items. Accordingly, the accompanying tables reconcile from U.S. GAAP to the equivalent non-U.S. GAAP measure.

On July 11, 2007, the United States Federal Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a judgment entered against Autoliv ASP, Inc., a subsidiary of Autoliv Inc. In the second quarter 2007, Autoliv increased its provision for legal disputes by $30 million which was charged against “Other income (expense), net” in the income statement, with a negative impact of $20 million on Net income. The table below reconciles the impact of the increase in legal reserves on reported GAAP income and key ratios.

Impact of legal reserve increase
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)

	Quarter July – September 2007						First nine months 2007
	Non-GAAP Excl. increase		Increase Amount		Reported GAAP		Non-GAAP Excl. increase		Increase Amount ¹⁾		Reported GAAP

Operating income		$110.0		$(-)		$110.0		$368.3		$(30.4)		$337.9
Operating margin, % ²⁾		7.1		(-)		7.1		7.4		(0.6)		6.8
Income before taxes		95.0		(-)		95.0		327.4		(30.4)		297.0
Net income		63.2		(-)		63.2		214.3		(20.4)		193.9
Operating working capital		666		(-)		666		686		(20)		666
Capital employed		3,482		(-)		3,482		3,502		(20)		3,482
Return on equity, %		10.6		(-)		10.6		11.8		(1.0)		10.8
Return on capital employed, %		12.9		(-)		12.9		14.3		(1.1)		13.2
Earnings per share ³⁾		0.81		(-)		0.81		2.71		(0.26)		2.45
Equity per share		30.88		(-)		30.88		31.14		(0.26)		30.88

1)	Increase in legal reserves based on the estimated costs for a judgment rendered by the U.S. Federal Circuit Court on July 11, 2007 accrued for in the second quarter 2007.

2)	Operating income relative to sales.

3)	Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares. The difference between basic and dilutive per share amounts is less than one percent for each period.

For additional information see the caption Legal Disputes under Note 1.11 above and Part II – Other Information, Item 1 below.

LIQUIDITY AND SOURCES OF CAPITAL

The Company uses the non-GAAP measure “Operating working capital” as defined in the table below in its communication with investors and for management review of the development of the working capital cash generation from operations. The reconciling items used to derive this measure are by contrast managed as part of the Company’s overall debt management.

Reconciliation of “Operating working capital” to GAAP financial measure (Dollars in millions)

	Sept 30, 2007		June 30, 2007		December 31, 2006		Sept 30, 2006

Total current assets		$2,183.4		$2,120.9		$2,098.4		$2,065.4
Total current liabilities		(1,716.5)		(1,682.0)		(1,531.6)		(1,414.3)
Working capital		466.9		438.9		566.8		651.1
Cash and cash equivalents		(160.1)		(136.1)		(168.1)		(131.9)
Short-term debt		330.4		312.4		294.1		118.8
Derivative asset and liability, current		(1.5)		0.1		1.2		0.1
Dividends payable		29.8		33.6		29.6		30.1
Operating working capital		$665.5		$648.9		$723.6		$668.2

Operations continue to generate strong cash flow. During the quarter, operating cash flow improved to $148 million from $102 million in the third quarter 2006, and cash flow before financing to $78 million from $24 million. The strong cash flow was achieved primarily as the result of significant improvements in working capital, despite the fact that factoring decreased by $36 million during the quarter. Operations for the first nine months 2007 generated a record-high cash flow of $549 million and of $245 million before financing compared to $403 million and $195 million during the first nine months 2006. This year’s strong cash flow was achieved despite the use of $80 million for the Mando Acquisition and an $18 million negative impact from our net factoring position.

During the quarter, capital expenditures, net of $72 million were $5 million less than depreciation and amortization and $12 million less than capital expenditures, net in the same quarter 2006. For the nine-month period the capital expenditures, net amounted to $228 million while depreciation and amortization were $236 million compared to $215 million and $223 million, respectively, during the same period of 2006.

Autoliv has a target that working capital should not exceed 10% of annual sales. During the quarter, this ratio remained at 10.1% as at the end of previous quarter but declined from 11.0% a year ago.

In relation to days sales outstanding, receivables increased slightly to 70 days from 69 days at the end of the second quarter but decreased from 83 days a year ago. Days inventory outstanding increased to 33 from 31 a quarter ago but decreased from 37 days a year ago.

The Company uses the non-GAAP measure “Net debt” as defined in the table below in its communication with investors regarding its capital structure and as the relevant metric monitoring its overall debt management. The reconciling items used to derive this measure are managed as part of overall debt management. This non-GAAP measure is a supplemental measure to the GAAP measure of total debt.

Autoliv’s policy is to maintain a net debt that is significantly below 3.0 times EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) and an interest-coverage ratio significantly above 2.75 times EBITDA. On September 30, these ratios were 1.6 and 9.9, respectively.

Reconciliation of “Net debt” to GAAP financial measure (Dollars in millions)

	Sept 30, 2007		June 30, 2007		December 31, 2006		Sept 30, 2006

Short-term debt	$	330.4	$	312.4	$	294.1	$	118.8
Long-term debt		975.7		822.3		887.7		982.8
Total debt		1,306.1		1,134.7		1,181.8		1,101.6
Cash and cash equivalents		(160.1)		(136.1)		(168.1)		(131.9)
Debt-related derivatives		(7.9)		(6.6)		(3.3)		(2.8)
Net debt	$	1,138.1	$	992.0	$	1,010.4	$	966.9

During the quarter, net debt increased by $146 million to $1,138 million and gross interest-bearing debt by $171 million to $1,306 million mainly due to stock buybacks and dividends totaling $191 million. The net debt to capitalization ratio increased to 32% from 29%. Despite dividends, stock buybacks and the Mando acquisition totaling $428 million, net debt has increased by only $128 million and gross interest-bearing debt by $124 million since the beginning of the year due to the strong cash flow. Net debt to capitalization increased to 32% from 29% at the beginning of the year and from 28% a year ago .

The non-GAAP measure net debt is also used in the non-GAAP measure “Leverage ratio” which together with the “Interest coverage ratio” constitute the Company’s debt limitation policy. This policy provides guidance to credit and equity investors regarding the extent to which the Company would be prepared to leverage its operations. These measures corresponded, until December 2004, to the financial covenants in the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility. Although these covenants no longer exist, the Company believes investors remain interested in these measures. For details on leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio, refer to the tables below that reconcile these two non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures.

Reconciliation of “Leverage ratio” to GAAP financial measure (Dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2007		September 30, 2006

Net debt ²⁾		$1,138.1		$966.9
Pension liabilities		96.6		58.9
Net debt per the policy		$1,234.7		$1,025.8

Income before income taxes ³⁾		$421.1		$488.0
Plus: Interest expense, net ^1) 3)		49.7		34.7
Depreciation and amortization of intangibles (incl. impairment write-offs) ³⁾		316.1		297.0
EBITDA per the Policy ³⁾		$786.9		$819.7

Net debt to EBITDA ratio		1.6		1.3

1)	Interest expense, net, is interest expense less interest income.

2)	Net debt is short- and long-term debt and debt-related derivatives less cash and cash equivalents.

3)	Latest 12-months.

Reconciliation of “Interest coverage ratio” to GAAP financial measure (Dollars in millions)

	September 30
	2007		2006
Operating income ³⁾		$474.1		$519.6
Amortization of intangibles (incl. impairment write-offs) ³⁾		18.3		15.5
Operating profit per the Policy ³⁾		$492.4		$535.1

Interest expense, net ^1) 3)		49.7		34.7

Interest coverage ratio		9.9		15.4

1)	Interest expense, net, is interest expense less interest income.

3)	Latest 12-months.

During the quarter, equity decreased by $83 million to $2,344 million or to $30.88 per share. Equity decreased by $160 million from share repurchases and by $31 million from dividends. Equity was favorably impacted by $63 million from net income, by $42 million from favorable currency effects, and by $3 million from the exercise of stock options. Equity decreased the first nine months by $59 million due to stock repurchases of $257 million and dividends of $91 million. Equity was positively impacted by $194 million from net income, by $72 million from currency effects, $13 million from effects of stock compensation and $10 million from the adoption of FIN-48.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material current or future effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Headcount

Total headcount (employees plus temporary hourly workers) decreased by 300 during the quarter and the nine-month period to 41,500. The decrease was due to a reduction of more than 600 in high-cost countries.

At the end of the quarter, 49% of headcount (and 51% of permanent employees excluding temporaries) were in low-cost countries compared to 46% (and 49%, respectively) a year ago and less than 10% eight years ago, when the reallocation of production started to accelerate.

Prospects

During the fourth quarter of 2007, global light vehicle production is expected to increase by nearly 6% due to a 12% growth in the Rest of the World and 20% increase in Eastern Europe. Autoliv expects its organic sales to grow by more than 2% and the Company’s consolidated sales to increase by approximately 8% providing that the current exchange rates prevail.

During the fourth quarter, operating margin will benefit from our restructuring activities and other aggressive cost reduction programs, while the effect of higher raw material prices is expected to level off. Consequently, operating margin is expected to improve from the 8.5% recorded in the fourth quarter 2006 to exceed 9% in this year’s fourth quarter, which is a slight modification of our previous guidance of “approximately 9%”.

For the full year 2007, Autoliv also revises its guidance of an expected increase in organic sales of “at least 3%” to “close to 4%”. The Company maintains its full year guidance of an operating margin of close to 7.5% including the cost in the second quarter related to legal reserves. On a comparable basis this would imply an operating margin of “close to 8%” adjusted for the increase in legal reserves in the second quarter (see Impact on legal reserve increase table above).

The effective tax rate is projected to amount to around 33% in line with what was previously communicated.

OTHER RECENT EVENTS

Launches in the 3rd quarter 2007

·	*BMW’s new Mini Clubman* ; Frontal airbags, side airbags, Inflatable Curtains, steering wheel, seatbelts with pretentioners and safety electronics

·	*Landwind's new CV7;* Frontal airbags and steering wheel

·	*Honda’s new Accord:* Side airbags and Inflatable curtains

·	*Renault’s new Laguna* ; Frontal airbags, side airbags, Inflatable Curtains, steering wheel, seatbelts with pretentioners and safety electronics

·	*Mercedes new C-class wagon* ; Side airbags, Inflatable curtains and active seatbelts with motorized pretensioners

·	*Nanjing Auto’s new TF* ; Frontal airbags and seatbelts with pretensioners

·	Toyotas new Mark X; Inflatable curtains

·	*Volkswagen’s new Tiguan;* Frontal airbags, Inflatable curtains and steering wheel

Other Significant Events

· During the quarter, Autoliv repurchased 2,858,595 shares for $160 million at an average cost of $56.10 per share and during the first nine months 4.5 million shares for $257 million at an average cost of $56.71 per share. Under the existing authorizations, an additional 1.5 million shares can be repurchased.

· Autoliv continues to move manufacturing from high cost countries by closing a U.S. seatbelt plant in Madisonville, Kentucky. Currently, the plant has 220 employees after having moved most of its production to Autoliv’s manufacturing facilities in Mexico.

· Mr. Kazuhiko Sakamoto has been elected to the Autoliv Board of Directors to replace Mr. Tetsuo Sekiya, who retired at the same meeting. Mr. Sekiya recently turned 73.

· Autoliv Korea has received the 2007 Best Labor Management Culture Award from the Korea Ministry of Labor. It was the only non-Korean company to receive this award.

· A U.S. federal appeals court recently denied Autoliv’s petition for rehearing of a case in which one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries was ordered to pay damages to a former supplier. In early October, Autoliv deposited $36 million with the trial court towards payment of the judgment in the case. The amount has been accrued for in previous quarters.

· In October, Autoliv acquired 41% of the shares in its 59% joint venture Autoliv Changchun Maw Hung Safety Systems for nearly $14 million. This consolidated Chinese seatbelt company, formed in 2002, will reach almost $50 million in sales this year.

· Autoliv has installed a state-of-the-art facility in its tech center in Tsukuba, North of Tokyo, to support the continued business growth in the important Japanese market. This $13 million investment and expansion includes an advanced crash sled with “pitching capabilities” to better replicate the crash dynamics of future vehicle designs. As a result, Autoliv will be the only automotive supplier in the world offering this capability.

Dividend and Next Report

The Company has declared a quarterly dividend of 39 cents per share for the fourth quarter 2007. This dividend will be paid on December 6 to shareholders of record as of November 8, 2007. The ex-date, when the stock trades without the right to the dividend, is November 6, 2007.

Autoliv intends to publish the quarterly report for the fourth quarter on Thursday January 31, 2008.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS

As of September 30, 2007, the Company’s future contractual obligations, have not changed significantly from the amounts reported in the 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on February 28, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on the table of contractual obligations.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As of September 30, 2007, there have been no material changes to the information related to quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk that was provided in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on February 28, 2007.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)	Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Autoliv’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effectively recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act.

(b)	Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Not applicable.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Various claims, lawsuits and proceedings are pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries, covering a range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities with respect to commercial, product liability and other matters.

Litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and the outcome of any litigation cannot be assured. After discussions with counsel, it is the opinion of management that the litigation to which the Company is currently a party will not have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial position of Autoliv. The Company may, however, experience material product liability or other losses in the future.

The Company believes that it is currently adequately insured against product and other liability risks at levels sufficient to cover potential claims. The level of coverage may, however, be insufficient in the future or unavailable on the market.

In the second quarter of 2007, there was a one time increase in the provision for legal disputes. For additional information, see Legal Disputes under Note 1.11 above.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

As of September 30, 2007, there have been no material changes in the information that was provided in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on February 28, 2007.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Stock repurchase program

During the third quarter of 2007, Autoliv repurchased 2,858,595 of its shares for $160.1 million at an average price of $56.02. Since the repurchasing program was adopted in 2000, Autoliv has bought back 28.5 million shares at an average price of $41.21 per share. Under the existing authorizations, another 1.5 million shares may be repurchased. Below is a summary of Autoliv's common stock repurchases by month for the quarter ended September 30, 2007:

Stockholm Stock Exchange

("SSE")

New York Stock Exchange

("NYSE")

SSE + NYSE

Total Number of Shares

Date

Total Number of Shares

Purchased

Average Price in USD

Paid per Share

Total Number of Shares

Purchased

Average Price in USD

Paid per Share

Purchased as Part of Publicly

Announced Plans or Programs

Average Price in USD

Paid per Share

Maximum Number of Shares

That May Yet Be Purchased Under the

Plans or Programs

July 1- 31

Total

0.0000

4,350,650

August 1-31

Total

750,000

55.6070

1,213,800

55.3940

1,963,800

55.4754

2,386,850

September 1-30

Total

330,000

57.1995

564,795

57.2145

894,795

57.2089

1,492,055

Total

1,080,000

56.0936

1,778,595

55.9721

2,858,595

56.0180

1,492,055

1)	Announcement of share buyback program with authorization to buy back 10 million shares made on May 9, 2000.
2)	Announcement of expansion of existing share buyback program from 10 million shares to 20 million shares made on April 30, 2003.
3)	Announcement of expansion of existing share buyback program from 20 million shares to 30 million shares made on December 15, 2005.
4)	The share buyback program does not have an expiration date.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.	Description

3.1	Autoliv's Restated Certificate of Incorporation incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-23813, filing date June 13, 1997) (the "Registration Statement").

3.2	Autoliv's Restated By-Laws incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement.

4.1	Rights Agreement, dated as of December 4, 1997, between Autoliv and First Chicago Trust Company of New York incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3 to Autoliv's Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No. 1-12933, filing date December 4, 1997).

10.1	Facilities Agreement, dated November 13, 2000, among Autoliv, Inc. and the lenders named therein, as amended by amendment dated November 5, 2001, as further amended by amendment dated December 12, 2001, and as further amended by amendment dated June 6, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 10-K (File No. 1-12933, filing date July 2, 2002).

10.2	Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Autoliv's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-26299, filing date May 1, 1997).

10.3	Amendment No. 1 to Autoliv, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 10-K (File No. 1-12933, filing date July 2, 2002).

10.4	Form of Employment Agreement between Autoliv, Inc. and its executive officers, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 10-K (File No. 1-12933, filing date July 2, 2002).

10.5	Form of Supplementary Agreement to the Employment Agreement between Autoliv and certain of its executive officers, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 10-K (File No. 1-12933, filing date July 2, 2002).

10.6	Employment Agreement, dated November 11, 1998, between Autoliv, Inc. and Lars Westerberg, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 10-K (File No. 1-12933, filing date July 2, 2002).

10.7	Form of Severance Agreement between Autoliv and its executive officers, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 10-K (File No. 1-12933, filing date July 2, 2002).

10.8	Pension Agreement, dated November 26, 1999, between Autoliv AB and Lars Westerberg, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 10-K (File No. 1-12933, filing date July 2, 2002).

10.9*	Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement - notice.

10.10*	Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement - pension.

10.11*	Form of Agreement - additional pension.

10.12**	Amendment No.2 to the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan.

10.13***	Employment Agreement, dated March 31, 2007, between Autoliv, Inc. and Jan Carlson.

10.14***	Retirement Benefits Agreement, dated August 14, 2007, between Autoliv AB and Jan Carlson.

11	Information concerning the calculation of Autoliv’s earnings per share is included in Note 1 of the Consolidated Notes to Financial Statements contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (File No. 1-12933, filing date February 28, 2007) and is incorporated herein by reference.

31.1 ***	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Autoliv, Inc. pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2 ***	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Autoliv, Inc. pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

32.1***	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Autoliv, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2***	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Autoliv, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*Filed in 10-K for the fiscal year ended 2002.

** Filed in 10-K for the fiscal year ended 2003.

*** Filed herewith.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: October 25, 2007

AUTOLIV, INC.

(Registrant)

By:	/s/ Magnus Lindquist

	Magnus Lindquist
	Vice President
	Chief Financial Officer

	(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Exhibit 10.13

THIS AGREEMENT is made the 31 ^st of March, 2007 between

1.	Autoliv Inc. ("the Company")

and

2.	Mr Jan Carlson, personal code number [OMITTED] ("the Appointee").

WHEREBY IT IS AGREED as follows:

The Company hereby agrees to employ the Appointee and the Appointee hereby agrees to serve the Company as Chief Executive Officer and President, from the 1 ^st of April 2007 and thereafter unless and until terminated by either party hereto giving to the other 18 calendar months' (the Company) respectively 12 months' (the Appointee) previous notice in writing to terminate the employment expiring at the end of the notice time or unless termination is made in accordance with the Severance Agreement. If the Company terminates the employment of the Appointee for whatever reason unless the termination is caused by a breach of the provisions in this Agreement, the Company shall in addition to any further compensation payments to the Appointee during the 18 months notice period and any other benefit payable to the Appointee, pay a lump sum severance payment equal to the sum of the amounts described in clauses (i) through (iv) of Section 6.2 of the Severance Agreement (dated March 30, 2005) determined as of the Date of Termination was the day on which the Company provides the notice described in the preceding paragraph. The said employment shall in any event terminate on the last day of the month preceding the 65th birthday of the Appointee.

During the continuance of his employment hereunder the Appointee shall unless prevented by ill health, injury or other incapacity and except when absent on authorized holiday use his best endeavours to promote the interests of the Company and those of its subsidiary and associated companies and shall during normal business hours devote the whole of his time, attention and abilities to the business and affairs of the Company and its subsidiary and associated companies. In addition the Appointee shall devote as much time outside normal business hours to the performance of his duties as may in the interests of the Company be reasonably necessary; the Appointee shall not receive any remuneration in addition to that set out in Clause 4 hereof in respect of his work during such time.

During the continuance of his employment hereunder the Appointee shall not without the consent of the Chairman of the Board of Directors directly or indirectly be engaged, concerned or interested in any business in a manner that would conflict Clause 2 hereof either alone or jointly with or as a director, manager, agent or servant of any other person, firm or company, provided that nothing in this clause shall preclude the Appointee from holding shares, loan, stock or other securities in an entity as an investment.

4.	As remuneration for his services hereunder, the Appointee is entitled to:

	a)	a gross salary of SEK 5,000,000 per annum which is subject to annual reviews starting 1 ^st of January 2008.
	b)	an annual bonus in accordance with the Company’s bonus program which for 2007 will amount to SEK 2,500,000 at target (annual rate) and which is subject to annual reviews starting 1 ^st of January 2008.
	c)	participate in the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan and such subsequent plans at terms and conditions set forth in such plans and with grants in the discretion of the Company's Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors of the Company. For the year 2007, the Compensation Committee and the Board decided on March 27, 2007 to grant the Appointee 15,000 stock options and 5,000 RSUs.
	d)	a motor car for use in connection with his duties under this Agreement and the Company shall bear all petrol, maintenance and repair costs, taxes and insurance in relation thereto, including the cost of all private mileage.
	e)	Skandia Medical Care Insurance for himself and his wife.
	f)	normal conditions of Employment as issued by the Company apply.

The Company shall pay to or reimburse the Appointee for all travelling, hotel and other expenses wholly exclusively and necessarily incurred by him in the performance of his duties under this Agreement. The Appointee shall on being so required provide the Company with vouchers or other evidence of actual payment of the said expenses.

6.	The Appointee is entitled to yearly holidays amounting to the legal minimum holiday days (at present 25) plus five days. The Swedish holiday law regulates such holiday entitlement including extra vacation pay.

The Appointee has the right, and if not otherwise agreed upon, the obligation to retire on the last day of the month preceding his 60 ^th birthday. Pension- and complementary sickness insurance are described in the enclosed “Pensionsförmåner” dated 31 March, 2007. In addition the Appointee is entitled to TGL (group life insurance).

The Company shall pay pension- and sick insurance fees corresponding to 35% of the base salary plus additional tax payments on premiums. Pension contribution can be increased via a cost neutral gross deduction from the salary.

This is a defined contribution solution hence no levels of benefits are guaranteed.

The Appointee shall not during or after the termination of his employment hereunder disclose to any person, firm of company whatsoever or use for his own purpose or for any purposes other than those of the Company any information relating to the Company or its subsidiary or associated companies or its or their business or trade secrets of which he has or shall hereafter become possessed. These restrictions shall cease to apply to any information which may come into the public domain (other than by breach of the provisions hereof).

The Appointee shall upon the termination of his employment hereunder for whatever reason immediately deliver up to the Company all designs, specifications, correspondence and other documents, papers, the car provided hereunder and all other property belonging to the Company or any company within the Group or which may have been prepared by him or have come into his possession in the course of his employment.

The Appointee must not during 12 months following the termination of this employment (i) accept employment within such part of a competitor of the Company, so that it can make use of such confidential information relating to the Company that the Appointee has obtained in his employment with the Company, (ii) engage himself as partner or owner in such competitor of the Company nor act as advisor to such competitor.

This non-competition engagement is not applicable when

	a)	the Company has given notice of terminating the employment, unless the termination is caused by a breach of the provisions in this Agreement by the Appointee
	b)	the Appointee has given notice of terminating the employment because of the Company's breach of the provisions in this Agreement

Breach of the provisions means such a situation when the other party has the right to terminate this Agreement with immediate effect.

If the Appointee does not comply with this non-competition engagement, the Company is entitled to damages amounting to 6 times the average monthly gross salary that the Appointee has received during the last 12 months before leaving the Company.

If this Agreement is terminated for any other reason than retirement, the Company shall pay, as a compensation for the inconvenience of the non-competition engagement, per month, the difference between the Appointee's monthly gross salary when the employment terminates and the lower salary that the Appointee may earn in a new employment. This payment shall not exceed 60 percent of the Appointee's gross salary when leaving the Company and the maximum time for the payments is 12 months. The Appointee has continuously to inform the Company of his gross salary in his new employment. This provision shall apply also if the Appointee has got no new employment. No payments will be made after retirement.

10.

The general nature of any discovery, invention, secret process or improvement made or discovered by the Appointee during the period of the Appointee's employment by the Company (hereinafter called "the Appointee's Inventions") shall be notified by the Appointee to the Company forthwith upon it being or discovered.

The entitlement as between the Company and the Appointee to the Appointee's Inventions shall be determined in accordance with the current Swedish Patent Act and the Appointee acknowledges that because of the nature of his duties and the particular responsibilities arising therefrom he has a special obligation to further the interests of the Company's undertaking.

Where the Appointee's Inventions are to be assigned to the Company, the Appointee shall make a full disclosure of the same to the Company and if and whenever required to do so shall at the expense of the Company apply or joint with the Company or other persons required by the Company in applying for letters, patent or other equivalent protection in Sweden and in any other part of the world of such Appointee's Inventions.

11.

This Agreement takes effect in substitution of all previous agreements and arrangements with the exception of Severance Agreement dated March 30 2005, whether written, oral or implied between the Company and the Appointee relating to the employment of the Appointee without prejudice to any rights accrued to the Company or the Appointee prior to the commencement of his employment under this Agreement.

12.

Disputes regarding this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Swedish Arbitration Act. The arbitration shall take place in Stockholm. The provisions on voting and cumulation of parties and claims in the Swedish Procedural Code shall be applied in the arbitration.

All costs and expenses for arbitration, whether initiated by the Company or by the Appointee, including the Appointee's costs for solicitor, shall be borne by the Company.

13.	This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with Swedish law including its rules as to the conflict of laws.

IN WITNESS whereof this Agreement has been executed the day and year first above written.

The Company:	The Appointee:
Autoliv Inc.


......................................................	......................................................
S. Jay Stewart	Jan Carlson
Chairman of the Board	President Region Europe


......................................................
James M. Ringler
Chairman of the Compensation Committee


......................................................
Lars Westerberg
CEO

Exhibit 10.14

Addendum to section 7 of the employment contract signed March 31, 2007

Retirement Benefits

As an employee of Autoliv AB (the “Company), Jan Carlson (the “Employee”) is covered by the individual terms and conditions of retirement benefits described below.

1. Qualifying Wages for Retirement Benefits

The insurance premiums and benefits according to section 7 will be based on the salary qualifying for retirement benefits, which is defined as fixed salary according to clause 4 a of the employment contract.

2. Terms and Conditions of Retirement Benefits

As of the first day of employment, the Employee will be entitled to retirement benefits through retirement and disability insurance purchased by the Company for which the total annual premiums are equal to 35 percent of fixed salary. Purchased policies within these limits are listed in clause 3.1 below, for which the total premiums thus shall not exceed the limits specified above.

The insurance policies purchased may be either occupational pension policies or company-owned endowment insurance policies. Allocation of premiums between the aforementioned types of insurance may vary over time, depending on the rules that apply to the Company’s right to deduct pension expenses from taxes.

The Company shall pay the premiums for the duration of the employment contract referred to in the heading of this document.

The Company makes no representations as to the amount of retirement benefits; the Company’s obligation shall be limited to the amount of the premiums. The retirement plan is thus a defined contribution plan. With regard to the portion of the premiums the Employee elects to invest in mutual funds, the Employee shall assume all risk related to any appreciation or depreciation in value of the mutual funds selected by the Employee. In relation to the portion of the premiums the Employee elects to invest in conventional insurance policies, the Employee understands and accepts that any appreciation or depreciation in value is dependent on the insurance provider’s bonus interest rate.

3. Insurance Plans

3.1 Purchased Policies

The Company has purchased occupational pension and company-owned endowment policies on the Employee’s behalf as follows. All policies are owned by the Company, with the Employee as the designated insured. The Employee shall have the right to select the insurance providers now and in the future. The selection of a new insurance provider shall not in any case increase the Company’s costs. Selection of a new insurance provider with regard to endowment policies may require a new retirement benefits agreement with regard to collateral pledges. In such case, the Company will facilitate the drafting of a new retirement benefits agreement.

3.1.1 Occupational Insurance Policies

·	ITP through Alecta

·	ITP-K through the insurance provider selected by the Employee

·	Alternative ITP: Retirement and survivors’ benefits insurance, currently through AMF Pension (policy numbers [OMITTED] and [OMITTED])

·	Supplemental Occupational Pension, Retirement and survivors’ benefits insurance, currently through AMF Pension (policy number [OMITTED])

3.1.2 Endowment Policies

·	Retirement and survivors’ benefits insurance, currently through Livförsäkringsaktiebolaget Skandia (policy number [OMITTED])

·	Disability insurance, currently through Livförsäkringsaktiebolaget Skandia

(policy number [OMITTED])

·	Retirement and survivors’ benefits insurance through Moderna Försäkringar

(policy number [OMITTED])

3.2 Direct Benefits

The Company agrees to pay the Employee or the Employee’s survivors the same amount, including any surplus and index-linked increase, that is paid to the Company by purchased endowment policies. “Survivors” refers primarily to the Employee’s spouse/domestic partner and secondarily to the Employee’s children.

Purchased endowment policies will be pledged to the benefit of the Employee and the Employee’s survivors as surety for the Company’s commitments. The Company is responsible for informing the affected insurance provider that a purchased endowment policy has been pledged.

Payroll taxes or other taxes of comparable nature that may be levied on the Company in connection with payment of direct benefits to the Employee or the Employee’s survivors are to be paid in full by the Company.

4. Index-linking

Any index-linking of retirement benefits shall be governed by the respective insurance provider’s terms and conditions.

5. Other Provisions

If Jan Carlson becomes partially or completely disabled and receives sickness benefits, disability benefits, or sickness compensation as provided by Swedish law, the benefits in accordance with this agreement shall nevertheless be fully vested.

The respective insurance provider’s general terms and conditions of insurance and other policy documents in applicable parts shall apply to the insurance policies purchased by the Company in accordance with clauses 3.1.1 and 3.1.2. If such terms and conditions, etc., conflict with the provisions of this agreement, this agreement shall prevail.

6. Right to Paid-up Insurance Policies upon Resignation

Upon resignation of employment for reasons other than disability of such nature that a right to premium waiver takes effect, the Employee shall have the right to retirement benefits equal to the value of paid-up insurance policies including any surpluses in purchased policies. However, the Company shall have no obligation in this situation to pay any amount over the amount actually received by the Company from the insurance policies according to this agreement.

7. Renegotiation

If changes in the law significantly alter conditions in relation to the Employee’s retirement benefits, the parties agree to initiate discussions concerning adjustment of the retirement benefits in consideration of the changed circumstances. However, the Employee shall always be entitled to retirement benefits equal to the value of paid-up insurance policies including any surpluses, provided that the Company has received the distributions due from the insurance policies above.

8. Disputes

Disputes concerning the validity, interpretation, or application of this retirement benefits agreement shall be adjudicated by a board of arbitration according to Swedish laws on arbitration in effect from time to time. The Company shall pay all costs for the board of arbitration, regardless of whether Jan Carlson or the Company initiates arbitration proceedings.

This agreement has been drawn up in two (2) identical originals, of which each party has taken one.

Stockholm, August 14, 2007

Autoliv Inc.

//signature//	//signature//
Hans-Göran Patring	Jan Carlson

Acknowledgement of Translation

The undersigned officer of Autoliv, Inc. hereby certifies that the foregoing translation of the retirement benefit agreement is a fair and accurate translation from Swedish of the original agreement within the meaning Rule 306 under Regulation S-T under the Securities Act of 1933.

/s/ Lars A. Sjöbring

------------------------------------

Lars A. Sjöbring

Vice President Legal, General Counsel

and Secretary

CERTIFICATIONS of CEO and CFO

I, Jan Carlson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of AUTOLIV, INC.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

		a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
		b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation' of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
		c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
		d)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

		a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
		b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financing reporting.

    Date: October 25, 2007

    AUTOLIV, INC.
    (Registrant)

By: /s/ Jan Carlson

Jan Carlson

President and Chief Executive Officer

I, Magnus Lindquist, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of AUTOLIV, INC.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

		a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
		b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation' of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
		c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
		d)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

		a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
		b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financing reporting.

    Date: October 25, 2007

    AUTOLIV, INC .
    (Registrant)

By: /s/ Magnus Lindquist

Magnus Lindquist

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Certification of CEO and CFO
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Autoliv, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jan Carlson, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report.

By: /s/ Jan Carlson

________________
Name: Jan Carlson
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: October 25, 2007

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Autoliv, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Magnus Linquist, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report.

By: /s/ Magnus Lindquist

_____________________
Name: Magnus Lindquist

Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: October 25, 2007

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.