FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
 
(Mark One)
 
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2013
 
OR
 
[  ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from ____to _____
 
_______________________________
 
Commission File Number 001-34195
 
GRAPHIC
 
Layne Christensen Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
 
Delaware
 
48-0920712
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
1900 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Mission Woods, Kansas
 
66205
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
 
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) (913) 362-0510
 
Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 
_____________________
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [X]   No [ ]
 
Indicated by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes [X]   No [ ]
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [X] Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company [ ]
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ]   No [X]
 
There were 19,880,734 shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share, outstanding on May 31, 2013.
 
 
 

 
 
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 2013
INDEX
 
     
Page
PART I
     
 
3
       
21
       
 
28
       
 
28
       
PART II
     
 
28
       
 
29
       
 
29
       
 
29
       
 
29
       
 
30
       
 
30
       
   
30
 
 
2

 
 
PART I
 
ITEM 1.  Financial Statements
 
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
   
April 30,
   
January 31,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2013
 
ASSETS
 
(unaudited)
   
(unaudited)
 
             
Current assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 27,177     $ 27,242  
Customer receivables, less allowance of $8,169 and $7,827, respectively
    144,127       145,890  
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts
    102,861       101,960  
Inventories
    47,773       49,913  
Deferred income taxes
    24,260       25,200  
Income taxes receivable
    6,809       6,809  
Restricted deposits-current
    3,420       -  
Assets of discontinued operations, held for sale
    3,423       -  
Other
    19,607       24,809  
Total current assets
    379,457       381,823  
                 
Property and equipment:
               
Land
    17,220       17,505  
Buildings
    40,609       40,621  
Machinery and equipment
    528,463       534,849  
      586,292       592,975  
Less - Accumulated depreciation
    (327,324 )     (326,435 )
Net property and equipment
    258,968       266,540  
                 
Other assets:
               
Investment in affiliates
    75,197       78,290  
Goodwill
    23,561       23,561  
Other intangible assets, net
    6,309       8,840  
Restricted deposits-long term
    2,418       2,861  
Deferred income taxes
    25,569       24,530  
Other
    20,229       25,781  
Total other assets
    153,283       163,863  
                 
Total assets
  $ 791,708     $ 812,226  
                 
 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
- Continued -
 
 
3

 
 
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - (Continued)
 
   
April 30,
   
January 31,
 
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
2013
   
2013
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
(unaudited)
   
(unaudited)
 
             
Current liabilities:
           
Accounts payable
  $ 100,445     $ 86,329  
Current maturities of long term debt
    14,447       12,789  
Accrued compensation
    41,259       53,651  
Accrued insurance expense
    12,952       13,645  
Other accrued expenses
    51,952       47,398  
Acquisition escrow obligation-current
    443       -  
Liabilities of discontinued operations, held for sale
    480       -  
Income taxes payable
    11,656       8,063  
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
    37,432       34,869  
Total current liabilities
    271,066       256,744  
                 
Noncurrent and deferred liabilities:
               
Long-term debt
    85,785       96,539  
Accrued insurance expense
    14,577       14,442  
Deferred income taxes
    1,544       1,553  
Acquisition escrow obligation-long term
    2,418       2,861  
Other
    25,172       25,016  
Total noncurrent and deferred liabilities
    129,496       140,411  
                 
Contingencies (Note 12)
               
                 
Stockholders' equity:
               
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, 30,000 shares authorized, 19,824 and 19,818
         
shares issued and outstanding, respectively
    198       198  
Capital in excess of par value
    353,172       352,048  
Retained earnings
    43,204       66,983  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (6,231 )     (6,492 )
Total Layne Christensen Company stockholders' equity
    390,343       412,737  
Noncontrolling interests
    803       2,334  
Total equity
    391,146       415,071  
                 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
  $ 791,708     $ 812,226  
 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
 
4

 
 
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
   
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
   
(unaudited)
 
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Revenues
  $ 226,446     $ 271,765  
Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation
               
and amortization, shown below)
    (189,555 )     (218,885 )
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    (41,944 )     (39,414 )
Depreciation and amortization
    (15,263 )     (13,803 )
Equity in (losses) earnings of affiliates
    (481 )     7,762  
Interest expense
    (1,298 )     (574 )
Other income, net
    3,751       1,110  
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
    (18,344 )     7,961  
Income tax expense
    (5,783 )     (3,325 )
Net (loss) income from continuing operations
    (24,127 )     4,636  
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
    417       (645 )
Net (loss) income
    (23,710 )     3,991  
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    (69 )     (242 )
Net (loss) income attributable to Layne Christensen Company
  $ (23,779 )   $ 3,749  
                 
Earnings per share information attributable to
               
Layne Christensen Company shareholders:
               
Basic (loss) income per share - continuing operations
  $ (1.24 )   $ 0.23  
Basic (loss) income per share - discontinued operations
    0.02       (0.04 )
Basic (loss) income per share
  $ (1.22 )   $ 0.19  
                 
Diluted (loss) income per share - continuing operations
  $ (1.24 )   $ 0.22  
Diluted (loss) income per share - discontinued operations
    0.02       (0.03 )
Diluted (loss) income per share
  $ (1.22 )   $ 0.19  
                 
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic
    19,543       19,472  
Dilutive stock options and nonvested shares
    -       342  
Weighted average shares outstanding  - dilutive
    19,543       19,814  
 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
 
5

 
 
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
 
    
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
   
(unaudited)
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Net (loss) income
  $ (23,710 )   $ 3,991  
Other comprehensive income:
               
Foreign currency translation adjustments
               
(net of tax of $285 and $79, respectively)
    261       496  
Other comprehensive income
    261       496  
Comprehensive (loss) income
    (23,449 )     4,487  
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling
               
interests (all attributable to net income)
    (69 )     (242 )
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Layne
               
Christensen Company
  $ (23,518 )   $ 4,245  
 
 
6

 
 
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
 
                                 
Total Layne
             
                           
Accumulated
   
Christensen
             
               
Capital In
         
Other
   
Company
             
    Common Stock     Excess of     Retained     Comprehensive     Stockholders'     Noncontrolling        
 (in thousands, except per share data)
 
Shares
   
Amount
   
Par Value
   
Earnings
   
Income (Loss)
   
Equity
   
Interest
   
Total
 
 Balance February 1, 2012
    19,699,272     $ 197     $ 351,057     $ 103,634     $ (6,223 )   $ 448,665     $ 3,216     $ 451,881  
 Net income
    -       -       -       3,749       -       3,749       242       3,991  
 Other comprehensive income
    -       -       -       -       496       496       -       496  
 Issuance of nonvested shares
    94,481       1       (1 )     -       -       -       -       -  
 Income tax deficiency on forfeiture
                                                               
    of options
    -       -       (165 )     -       -       (165 )     -       (165 )
 Acquisition of noncontrolling interest
    -       -       (2,656 )     -       -       (2,656 )     (87 )     (2,743 )
 Share-based compensation
    -       -       1,436       -       -       1,436       -       1,436  
 Balance April 30, 2012
    19,793,753     $ 198     $ 349,671     $ 107,383     $ (5,727 )   $ 451,525     $ 3,371     $ 454,896  
                                                                 
 Balance February 1, 2013
    19,818,376     $ 198     $ 352,048     $ 66,983     $ (6,492 )   $ 412,737     $ 2,334     $ 415,071  
 Net income (loss)
    -       -       -       (23,779 )     -       (23,779 )     69       (23,710 )
 Other comprehensive income (loss)
    -       -       -       -       261       261               261  
 Distributions to noncontrolling interests
    -       -       -       -       -               (1,600 )     (1,600 )
 Foreign Currency Translation
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -  
 Issuance of nonvested shares
    4,744       -       -       -       -       -       -       -  
 Issuance of stock upon exercise
    8,939       -       (53 )     -       -       (53 )      -       (53 )
 Cancellation of stock options issued
    (8,099 )     -       -       -       -       -        -       -  
 Income tax deficiency on forfeiture of options
    -       -       (13 )     -       -       (13 )      -       (13 )
 Share-based compensation
    -       -       1,190       -       -       1,190        -       1,190  
 Balance April 30, 2013
    19,823,960     $ 198     $ 353,172     $ 43,204     $ (6,231 )   $ 390,343     $ 803     $ 391,146  
 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
 
7

 
 
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
 
   
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
   
(unaudited)
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Cash flow from operating activities:
           
Net (loss) income
  $ (23,710 )   $ 3,991  
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash from operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    15,318       15,683  
Deferred income taxes
    (660 )     (413 )
Share-based compensation
    1,190       1,436  
Equity in (loss) earnings of affiliates
    481       (7,762 )
Dividends received from affiliates
    2,612       1,648  
Gain from disposal of property and equipment
    (3,373 )     (317 )
Changes in current assets and liabilities,exclusive of effects of acquisitions:
               
Decrease (increase) in customer receivables
    354       (1,332 )
Decrease in costs and estimated earnings in excess
               
of billings on uncompleted contracts
    2,517       193  
Decrease (increase) in inventories
    1,636       (2,361 )
Increase in other current assets
    (1,401 )     (3,571 )
Decrease (increase) in accounts payable and accrued expenses
    12,493       (5,369 )
Decrease (increase) in billings in excess of costs and
               
estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
    551       (5,910 )
Other, net
    2,792       2,127  
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    10,800       (1,957 )
Cash flow from investing activities:
               
Additions to property and equipment
    (9,137 )     (16,432 )
Additions to gas transportation facilities and equipment
    -       (9 )
Additions to oil and gas properties
    -       (943 )
Additions to mineral interests in oil and gas properties
    -       (68 )
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment
    5,189       1,166  
Proceeds from redemption of insurance contracts
     3,565        -  
Release of cash from restricted accounts
    -       140  
Distribution of restricted cash for prior year acquisitions
    -       (140 )
Cash used in investing activities
    (383 )     (16,286 )
Cash flow from financing activities:
               
Borrowing under revolving loan facilities
    8,000       30,000  
Repayments under revolving loan facilities
    (18,500 )     (5,000 )
Net increase (decrease) in notes payable
    2,839       (597 )
Principal payments under capital lease obligations
    (392 )     -  
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest
    -       (2,743 )
Distribution to noncontrolling interests
    (1,600 )     -  
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (9,653 )     21,660  
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash
    (829 )     1,826  
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
    (65 )     5,243  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    27,242       41,916  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 27,177     $ 47,159  
 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
 
8

 
 
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
 
1.  Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
 
Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Layne Christensen Company and its subsidiaries (together, the "Company"). Intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Investments in affiliates (20% to 50% owned) in which the Company exercises influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for by the equity method.  The unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended January 31, 2013, as filed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full year. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the time of the filing of these consolidated financial statements.
 
Use of Estimates in Preparing Financial Statements - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Presentation – As discussed further in Note 11, the Company has reclassified certain businesses as discontinued operations in both the current and prior periods presented.
 
Revenue Recognition - Revenues are recognized on large, long-term construction contracts meeting the criteria of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605-35 “Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts” (“ASC Topic 605-35”), using the percentage-of-completion method based upon the ratio of costs incurred to total estimated costs at completion. Contract price and cost estimates are reviewed periodically as work progresses and adjustments proportionate to the percentage of completion are reflected in contract revenues in the reporting period when such estimates are revised. The nature of accounting for contracts is such that refinements of the estimating process for changing conditions and new developments are continuous and characteristic of the process. Many factors can and do change during a contract performance period which can result in a change to contract profitability including differing site conditions (to the extent that contract remedies are unavailable), the availability of skilled contract labor, the performance of major material suppliers, the performance of major subcontractors, unusual weather conditions and unexpected changes in material costs. These factors may result in revision to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted construction contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Because the Company has many contracts in process at any given time, these changes in estimates can offset each other minimizing the impact on overall profitability. However, large changes in cost estimates on larger, more complex construction projects can have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and are reflected in results of operations when they become known.
As allowed by ASC Topic 605-35, revenue is recognized on smaller, short-term construction contracts using the completed contract method. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted construction contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined.
Contracts for the Company’s mineral exploration drilling services are billable based on the quantity of drilling performed and revenues for these drilling contracts are recognized on the basis of actual footage or meterage drilled.
Revenues for direct sales of equipment and other ancillary products not provided in conjunction with the performance of construction contracts are recognized at the date of delivery to, and acceptance by, the customer. Provisions for estimated warranty obligations are made in the period in which the sales occur.
The Company’s revenues are presented net of taxes imposed on revenue-producing transactions with its customers, such as, but not limited to, sales, use, value-added and some excise taxes.
 
Goodwill   - The Company’s impairment evaluation for goodwill is conducted annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset might be impaired. The process of evaluating goodwill for impairment involves the determination of the fair value of the Company’s reporting units. Inherent in such fair value determinations are certain judgments and estimates, including the interpretation of current economic indicators and market valuations, and assumptions about the Company’s strategic plans with regard to its operations. The Company believes at this time that the carrying value of the remaining goodwill is appropriate, although to the extent additional information arises or the Company’s strategies change, it is possible that the Company’s conclusions regarding impairment of the remaining goodwill could change and result in a material effect on its financial position and results of operations.
 
Intangible Assets - Other intangible assets primarily consist of trademarks, customer-related intangible assets and patents obtained through business acquisitions. Amortizable intangible assets are being amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from one to thirty five years.
 
 
9

 
 
Other Long-lived Assets - Long-lived assets, including amortizable intangible assets, are reviewed for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include but are not limited to the following:
 
 
significant underperformance of our assets;
 
 
significant changes in the use of the assets; and
 
 
significant negative industry or economic trends.
 
The Company believes at this time that the carrying values and useful lives of its long-lived assets continue to be appropriate.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents   - The Company considers investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Company’s cash equivalents are subject to potential credit risk. The Company’s cash management and investment policies restrict investments to investment grade, highly liquid securities. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value.
 
Restricted Deposits - Restricted deposits consist of escrow funds associated primarily with acquisitions, and at April 30, 2013, funds which are currently being held by the owners of a bank in Africa (see Note 12).
 
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts Receivable - The Company makes ongoing estimates relating to the collectability of its accounts receivable and maintains an allowance for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. In determining the amount of the allowance, the Company makes judgments about the creditworthiness of significant customers based on ongoing credit evaluations, and also considers a review of accounts receivable aging, industry trends, customer financial strength, credit standing and payment history to assess the probability of collection.
The Company does not establish an allowance for credit losses on long-term contract unbilled receivables. Adjustments to unbilled receivables related to credit quality, if they occur, are accounted for as a reduction of revenue.
 
Accrued Insurance Expense - The Company maintains insurance programs where it is responsible for a certain amount of each claim up to a self-insured limit. Estimates are recorded for health and welfare, property and casualty insurance costs that are associated with these programs. These costs are estimated based in part on actuarially determined projections of future payments under these programs. Should a greater amount of claims occur compared to what was estimated or costs of the medical profession increase beyond what was anticipated, reserves recorded may not be sufficient and additional costs to the consolidated financial statements could be required.
Costs estimated to be incurred in the future for employee medical benefits, property, workers’ compensation and casualty insurance programs resulting from claims which have occurred are accrued currently. Under the terms of the Company's agreement with the various insurance carriers administering these claims, the Company is not required to remit the total premium until the claims are actually paid by the insurance companies. These costs are not expected to significantly impact liquidity in future periods.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, customer receivables and accounts payable, approximate fair value at April 30, 2013 and January 31, 2013, because of the relatively short maturity of those instruments. See Note 4 for disclosure regarding the fair value of indebtedness of the Company and Note 7 for other fair value disclosures.
 
Litigation and Other Contingencies - The Company is involved in litigation incidental to its business, the disposition of which is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by changes in the Company’s assumptions related to these proceedings. The Company records a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and a minimum amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. To the extent additional information arises or the Company’s strategies change, it is possible that the Company’s estimate of its probable liability in these matters may change.
 
Derivatives - The Company periodically enters into hedge contracts, which are recorded at fair value, related to certain forecasted foreign currency costs which are accounted for as cash flow hedges, such that changes in fair value for the effective portion of hedge contracts are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity, until the hedged item is recognized in operations. The ineffective portion of the derivatives’ change in fair value, if any, is immediately recognized in operations. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
 
 
10

 
 
Share-based Compensation - The Company recognizes all share-based instruments in the financial statements and utilizes a fair-value measurement of the associated costs. As of April 30, 2013, the Company had unrecognized compensation expense of $6,454,000 to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years. The Company determines the fair value of share-based compensation granted in the form of stock options using a lattice valuation model. In addition, the Company granted certain market based awards in the current quarter which are valued using the Monte Carlo valuation model.
Unearned compensation expense associated with the issuance of nonvested shares is amortized on a straight-line basis as the restrictions on the stock expire, subject to achievement of certain contingencies.
 
Income Taxes - Income taxes are provided using the asset/liability method, in which deferred taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reviewed for recoverability and valuation allowances are provided as necessary. Provision for U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries and affiliates is made only on those amounts in excess of funds considered to be invested indefinitely. In general, the Company records income tax expense during interim periods based on its best estimate of the full year’s effective tax rate. However, income tax expense relating to adjustments to the Company’s liabilities for uncertainty in income tax positions is accounted for discretely in the interim period in which it occurs.        
        In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, the Company considers both positive and negative evidence related to the likelihood of realization of the deferred tax assets. The weight given to the positive and negative evidence is commensurate with the extent to which the evidence may be objectively verified. Accounting guidance states that a cumulative loss in recent years is a significant piece of negative evidence that is difficult to overcome in determining that a valuation allowance is not needed against deferred tax assets. As such, it is generally difficult for positive evidence regarding projected future taxable income exclusive of reversing taxable temporary differences to outweigh objective negative evidence of recent financial reporting losses. In preparing future taxable income projections, the Company considers the periods in which future reversals of existing taxable and deductible temporary differences are likely to occur, future taxable income, taxable income available in prior carry back years and the availability of tax-planning strategies when determining the realizability of recorded deferred tax assets. Provisions for U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries and affiliates is made only on those amounts in excess of those funds considered to be invested indefinitely (see Note 6).
        The Company’s estimate of uncertainty in income taxes is based on the framework established in the accounting for income taxes guidance. This guidance addresses the determination of how tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. For tax positions that meet this recognition threshold, the Company applies judgement, taking into account applicable tax laws and experience in managing tax audits and relevant accounting guidance, to determine the amount of tax benefits to recognize in the financial statements. For each position, the difference between the benefit realized on our tax return and the benefit reflected in the financial statements is recorded as a liability in the consolidated balance sheet. This liability is updated at each financial statement date to reflect the impacts of audit settlements and other resolution of audit issues, expiration of statutes of limitation, develoments in tax law and ongoing issues with taxing authorities.
 
Earnings Per Share - Earnings per share are based upon the weighted average number of common and dilutive equivalent shares outstanding.  Options to purchase common stock and nonvested shares are included based on the treasury stock method for dilutive earnings per share, except when their effect is antidilutive. Options to purchase 1,470,940 and 833,736 shares have been excluded from weighted average shares in the periods ending April 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, as their effect was antidilutive. A total of 272,311 and 321,400 nonvested shares have been excluded from weighted average shares in the periods ended April 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, as their effect was antidilutive.
 
Supplemental Cash Flow Information - The amounts paid for income taxes, interest and noncash investing activities were as follows:
 
   
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Income taxes
  $ 1,762     $ 4,314  
Interest
    732       229  
Noncash investing activities:
               
Accrued capital additions
    1,679       1,688  
 
New Accounting Pronouncements – In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, “Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures About Offsetting Assets and Liabilities”, is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013. This limits the scope of offsetting disclosures to recognized derivative instruments accounted for in accordance with ASC 815. Adoption of this pronouncement did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.
On February 5, 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”, which is effective for fiscal years (and interim periods within those years) beginning after December 15, 2012. This requires the Company to present information about significant items reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI) either on the face of the income statement , as well as additional disclosures on changes in AOCI by component or as a separate disclosure in the notes to the financial statements. Adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In July, 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment”, which is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. This guidance permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 250-30, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The more-likely than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. If the Company determines that it is not more likely than not that the asset is impaired, the Company will have an option not to calculate annually the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset.  The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
 
11

 
 
2.  Acquisitions
 
Fiscal Year 2013
 
On March 5, 2012, the Company acquired the remaining shares in Layne do Brazil, which were previously held by noncontrolling interests. The shares were acquired for cash payments totaling $2,743,000. In conjunction with the acquisition, the Company eliminated noncontrolling interests of $87,000 and recorded an adjustment to equity of $2,656,000 in accordance with ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation”.
On May 30, 2012, the Company acquired the remaining 50% interest of Diberil Sociedad Anónima (“Diberil”), a Uruguayan company and parent company to Costa Fortuna (Brazil and Uruguay). We expect Diberil to expand our geoconstruction capabilities into the Brazil market as well as serve as a platform for further expansion into South America. The aggregate purchase price for the remaining 50% of Diberil of $16,150,000 was comprised of cash ($2,422,000 of which was placed in escrow to secure certain representations, warranties and indemnifications). The Company acquired the initial 50% interest in Diberil on July 15, 2010. In accordance with accounting guidance in moving Diberil to a fully consolidated basis, the Company remeasured the previously held equity investment to fair value and recognized a loss of $7,705,000 during the second quarter. The fair value of the 50% noncontrolling interest was estimated to be $15,794,000 at the time of the adjustment. The fair value assessment was determined based on the value of the fiscal 2013 transaction, discounted to reflect that the initial interest was noncontrolling, and that there was no ready public market for our interest. The discounts for lack of control and marketability were 5% and 10%, respectively, determined based on control premiums seen on transactions in the construction contractor and engineering services market and an estimate of the value of a put option on restricted stock using the Black-Scholes valuation method.
Acquisition related costs of $228,000 were recorded as an expense in the periods in which the costs were incurred. The purchase price allocation was based on an assessment of the fair value of the assets required and liabilities assumed using the Company’s internal operational assessments and other analyses which are Level 3 measurements.
Based on the Company’s allocation of the purchase price, the acquisition had the following effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position as of the closing date:
 
(in thousands)
 
Diberil
 
Working capital
  $ 3,592  
Property and equipment
    33,500  
Goodwill
    4,025  
Other intangible assets
    1,000  
Other assets
    9,131  
Other noncurrent liabilities
    ( 16,981 )
Total purchase price
  $ 34,267  
 
The $4,025,000 of goodwill was assigned to the Geoconstruction Division. The purchase price in excess of the value of Diberil’s net assets reflects the strategic value the Company placed on the business. The Company believes it will benefit from synergies as these acquired operations are integrated with the Company’s existing operations. Goodwill associated with the acquisition is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
The Diberil purchase agreement provided for a purchase price adjustment based on the levels of working capital and debt at closing. The adjustment resulted in an additional purchase price of $2,323,000, which was paid during the third quarter of fiscal year 2013.
The total purchase price above consists of the $16,150,000 cash purchase price, the $2,323,000 purchase price adjustment, and the $15,794,000 adjusted basis of our existing investment in Diberil.
The results of operations of Diberil have been included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations commencing on the closing date.
Assuming the remaining 50% of Diberil had been acquired at the beginning of the period, the unaudited pro forma consolidated revenues, net income, and net income per share of the Company would be as follows:
 
   
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
2012
 
Revenues
  $ 288,335  
         
Net income
    5,684  
         
Basic income per share
  $ 0.29  
Diluted income per share
  $ 0.29  
 
3.  Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
 
The carrying amount of goodwill attributed to each reporting segment was as follows:
 
(in thousands)
 
Water
Resources
   
Inliner
   
Heavy Civil
   
Geoconstruction
   
Mineral
Exploration
   
Energy Services
   
Total
 
Balance February 1, 2013
$ -     8,915      -      14,646      -      -      23,561  
Additions
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -  
Balance April 30, 2013
  $ -     8,915     $ -      14,646      -      -      23,561  
 
Other intangible assets consist of the following:
 
   
April 30, 2013
   
January 31, 2013
 
(in thousands)
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
   
Accumulated Amortization
   
Weighted
Average
Amortization
Period in
Years
   
Gross
Carrying
Amount
   
Accumulated Amortization
   
Weighted
Average
Amortization
Period in
Years
 
Amortizable intangible assets:
                               
Tradenames
  $ 6,288     $ (2,902 )   14     $ 8,008     $ (3,798 )   14  
Customer/contract-related
    3,340       (3,318 )   1       3,340       (3,215 )   1  
Patents
    1,589       (1,154 )   15       3,012       (1,634 )   15  
Software and licenses
    2,747       (1,107 )   3       2,747       (919 )   3  
Non-competition agreements
    680       (283 )   6       680       (255 )   6  
Other
    1,067       (638 )   22       1,600       (726 )   21  
Total intangible assets
  $ 15,711     $ (9,402 )         $ 19,387     $ (10,547 )      
 
Total amortization expense for other intangible assets was $ 460,000 and $712,000 for the three months ended April 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
 
 
12

 
 
4.      Indebtedness
 
        Debt outstanding as of April 30, 2013, and January 31, 2013, whose carrying value approximates fair value, was as follows:
 
   
April 30,
   
January 31,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2013
 
Credit agreement
  $ 84,500     $ 95,000  
Capital lease obligations
    3,084       3,645  
Less amounts representing interest
    (844 )     (993 )
Short-term notes payable
    13,492       11,676  
Total debt
    100,232       109,328  
Less notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt
    (14,447 )     (12,789 )
Total long-term debt
  $ 85,785     $ 96,539  
 
 
         The Company maintains a $300,000,000 revolving credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”) which extends to March 25, 2016. During fiscal 2012, the Company funded $1,716,000 of debt issuance costs through borrowings under its Credit Agreement. These costs are being amortized over the life of the agreement.
The Credit Agreement provides for interest at variable rates equal to, at the Company’s option, a LIBOR rate plus 1.25% to 2.50%, or a base rate as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus up to 1.25%, each depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. On April 30, 2013, there were letters of credit of $ 24,298,000 and borrowings of $ 84,500,000 outstanding on the Credit Agreement resulting in available capacity of $ 191,202,000 .
The Credit Agreement contains certain covenants including restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness and liens, investments, acquisitions, transfer or sale of assets, transactions with affiliates,and payment of dividends. These provisions generally allow such activity to occur, subject to specific limitations and continued compliance with financial maintenance covenants. Significant financial maintenance covenants are a fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. The financial covenants are based on defined terms included in the Credit Agreement, such as adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDAR. Compliance with the financial covenants is required on a quarterly basis, using the most recent four fiscal quarters.  Adjusted EBITDA is generally defined as consolidated net income excluding discontinued operations, net interest expense, provision for income taxes, gains or losses from extraordinary items, gains or losses from the sale of capital assets, non-cash items including depreciation and amortization, and share-based compensation. Equity in earnings of affiliates is included only to the extent of dividends or distributions received. Adjusted EBITDAR is defined as adjusted EBITDA, plus rent expense. All of these measures are considered non-GAAP financial measures and are not intended to be in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
    The Company’s minimum fixed charge coverage ratio covenant is the ratio of adjusted EBITDAR to the sum of fixed charges.  Fixed charges consist of rent expense, interest expense, and principal payments of long-term debt. The Company’s leverage ratio covenant is the ratio of total funded indebtedness to adjusted EBITDA. Total funded indebtedness generally consists of outstanding debt, capital leases, asset retirement obligations and escrow liabilities.
Based on recent and forecasted results of operations and projected levels of indebtedness, the Company’s compliance with its financial covenants at  April 30, 2013 and over the balance of fiscal 2014 was in question. On June 4, 2013, the Company and its lenders amended the Credit Agreement to suspend the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and the maximum leverage ratio covenants for the fiscal quarters ending July 31 and October 31, 2013. These covenants will be reinstated at their original levels beginning with the fiscal quarter ending January 31, 2014.
The Credit Agreement was also amended to temporarily add minimum EBITDA and maximum capital expenditure covenants on a quarterly and fiscal year to date basis. The minimum EBITDA covenant applies through October 31, 2013, while the maximum capital expenditure covenant applies through January 31, 2014. The amendment also modified the definition of adjusted EBITDA to exclude up to $3,000,000 per quarter of relocation expenses related to the move of the Company’s headquarters to The Woodlands, Texas. The actual covenant levels as of April 30, 2013, disclosed below are based on the amended definition.
    As of April 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s actual and required covenant levels under the Credit Agreement were as follows:
 
   
Actual
 
Required
 
Actual
 
Required
   
April 30,
2013
 
April 30,
2013
 
April 30,
2012
 
April 30,
2012
Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio
    1.99       1.50       2.66       1.50  
Maximum leverage ratio
    2.61       3.00       1.21       3.00  
 
In connection with the amendment, the Company and its domestic subsidiaries granted liens on substantially all of their assets, subject to certain exceptions, including a pledge of up to 65% of the equity interests in their first-tier foreign subsidiaries, to secure the Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement. The term of the agreement was not changed.
Prior to the amendment of the Credit Agreement, the Company also maintained a private shelf agreement whereby it could issue $150 ,000,000 of unsecured notes before July 8, 2021. In connection with the amendment to the Credit Agreement, the shelf agreement was terminated. There were no outstanding notes at the time of termination.
 
5.  Other Income, Net
 
Other income, net consisted of the following for the three months ended April 30, 2013 and 2012:
 
   
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Gains from disposal of property and equipment
  $ 3,373     $ 347  
Interest income
    28       50  
Currency exchange (loss) gain
    (78 )     586  
Other
    428       127  
Total
  $ 3,751     $ 1,110  
 
During April 2013, the Company received insurance proceeds totaling $455,000 as payment for equipment lost in a fire. These proceeds are included in gains from disposal of property and equipment.
 
 
13

 
 
6.  Income Taxes
 
Income tax expense for continuing operations of $5,783,000 was recorded in the three months ended April 30, 2013, compared to $3,325,000 tax expense for the same period last year. The Company had a discrete period non-cash valuation allowance of approximately $8,000,000 against its foreign tax credits generated in prior years impacting income tax expense for  the three months ended April 30, 2013. The effective tax rates for continuing operations for the three months ended April 30, 2013 and 2012  were (31.5)% and 41.8%, respectively. The difference in the effective rate as compared to the prior year was primarily due to the discrete period item, an increase in the valuation allowance recorded against foreign tax credit carryovers generated in the current year and the mix of income or loss earned in tax jurisdictions in which the Company conducts its business operations.
The Company assessed the need for a valuation allowance on the value of our deferred tax assets. The Company was not in a cumulative loss position as of April 30, 2013, based on a trailing 36 month analysis of continuing operations for each jurisdiction, after adjusting for significant non-recurring items. During the first quarter, as a result of project cancellations and delays late in the quarter in Geoconstruction and the downturn in Mineral Exploration, the Company changed its expectations regarding the ability to use certain tax attributes in the future. As a result of a weakened forecast during the quarter of domestic earnings for fiscal 2014 and beyond, the Company increased the valuation allowance against its foreign tax credit carryovers from prior years, resulting in a discrete charge to the provision for income taxes from continuing operations of approximately $8,000,000.  This change resulted from our current expectations on the forecasted income in the U.S.  The Company has the ability to elect to deduct foreign taxes or claim a tax credit. Foreign tax credit carryovers have an expiration period of ten years. Based on the current outlook, it is expected that the Company will realize a benefit from its foreign taxes in the form of a deduction. Management will continue to evaluate all of the evidence in future quarters and will make a determination as to whether it is more-likely-than not that deferred tax assets will be realized. If additional evidence becomes available in future quarters, management will re-assess the need for a valuation allowance and will make additional adjustments to the valuation allowance, if necessary, to record deferred taxes at the amount which it believes will more-likely-than-not be realized.  If forecasted domestic earnings continue to deteriorate, additional valuation allowances may be required in future periods. The domestic deferred tax assets, net of recorded valuation allowances, was approximately $46,400,000 at April 30, 2013.
        As of April 30 and January 31, 2013, the total number of unrecognized tax benefits recorded was $14,160,000 and $13,383,000 respectively, of which substantially all would affect the effective tax rate if recognized. The Company does not expect the unrecognized tax benefits to change materially within the next 12 months. The Company classifies uncertain tax positions as non-current income tax liabilities unless expected to be paid in one year. The Company reports income tax-related interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense. As of April 30 and January 31, 2013, the total amount of accrued income tax-related interest and penalties included in the balance sheet was $9,304,000 and $8,809,000 respectively.
 
7.  Fair Value Measurements
 
The Company’s estimates of fair value for financial assets and financial liabilities are based on the framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. The framework is based on the inputs used in the valuation, gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and requires that observable inputs be used in the valuations when available. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are listed below:
 
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets in inactive markets. 
 
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions and best estimate of what inputs market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
 
The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The Company’s financial instruments held at fair value are presented below as of April 30, 2013 and January 31, 2013:
 
         
Fair Value Measurements
 
(in thousands)
 
Carrying Value
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
 
April 30, 2013
                       
Financial Assets:
                       
Restricted deposits held at fair value
  $ 5,838     $ 5,838     $ -     $ -  
Financial Liabilities:
                               
   Contingent earnout of acquired businesses (1)
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
January 31, 2013
                               
Financial Assets:
                               
Restricted deposits held at fair value
  $ 2,861     $ 2,861     $ -     $ -  
 
 
(1)
The fair value of the contingent earnout of acquired businesses is determined using a mark-to-market modeling technique based on significant unobservable inputs calculated using a discounted future cash flows approach.   The contingent earnout is associated with an acquisition that took place in fiscal 2011. The potential earnout period ends in July 2015. Key assumptions include a discount rate of 41.2% and annual revenues of acquired businesses ranging from $1,500,000 to $6,100,000 over the life of the earnout.  On July 31, 2012, the contingent earnout was reassessed and, based on our estimates of the likelihood of future revenues subject to the earnout provisions, assigned no value.  Our conclusions have not changed since that time.
 
8.  Stock and Stock Option Plans
 
The Company has stock option and employee incentive plans that provide for the granting of options to purchase or the issuance of shares of common stock at a price fixed by the Board of Directors or a committee. As of April 30, 2013, there were 359,394 shares which remain available to be granted under the plans as stock options. The Company has the ability to issue shares under the plans either from new issuances or from treasury, although it has previously always issued new shares and expects to continue to issue new shares in the future. For the three months ended April 30, 2013, the Company granted 4,744 nonvested shares which, in general, ratably vest over periods of one to four years from the grant date. The current quarter grants consist of both service based awards and market based awards.
The Company recognized $1,190,000 and $1,436,000 of compensation cost for these share-based plans during the three months ended April 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Of these amounts, $365,000 and $459,000, respectively, related to nonvested stock. The total income tax benefit recognized for share-based compensation arrangements was $464,000 and $560,000 for the three months ended April 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
A summary of nonvested share activity for the three months ended April 30, 2013, is as follows:
 
 
14

 
 
   
Number of
Shares
   
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
   
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
 
Nonvested stock at February 1, 2013
    275,666     $ 27.41      $ 5,905  
Granted
    4,744       21.08          
Vested
    -       -          
Canceled
    (8,099 )     20.89          
Nonvested stock at April 30, 2013
    272,311      $ 28.11     $ 5,563  
 
Significant stock option groups outstanding at April 30, 2013, related exercise price and remaining contractual term were as follows:
 
Grant Date
   
Options
Outstanding
   
Options
Exercisable
   
Exercise
Price
   
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Months)
 
6/04       20,000       20,000     $ 16.60     14  
6/04       53,076       53,076       16.65     14  
6/05       10,000       10,000       17.54     26  
9/05       94,707       94,707       23.05     29  
1/06       173,981       173,981       27.87     33  
6/06       80,000       80,000       29.29     38  
6/07       65,625       65,625       42.26     50  
7/07       25,500       25,500       42.76     51  
2/08       72,439       72,439       35.71     57  
1/09       6,000       6,000       24.01     68  
2/09       153,813       153,810       15.78     69  
2/09       4,580       4,580       15.78     69  
6/09       92,551       92,551       21.99     73  
6/09       2,472       2,472       21.99     73  
2/10       76,590       76,590       27.79     81  
2/10       2,721       2,721       25.44     81  
2/11       93,193       62,118       33.10     93  
3/11       1,312       874       34.50     95  
6/11       2,096       698       28.71     97  
7/11       17,893       5,963       29.31     99  
2/12       174,649       64,963       24.32     105  
4/12       27,135       9,030       21.77     107  
7/12       16,477       -       20.89     110  
8/12       9,554       -       20.56     111  
4/13       194,576       23,256       21.08     119  
        1,470,940       1,100,954                
 
All options were granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. The weighted average fair value at the date of grant for the options granted was $9.68 and $11.96 for the three months ended April 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The fair value was based on an expected life of approximately seven years, no dividend yield, an average risk-free rate of 1.9% and 1.3%, respectively, and assumed volatility of all options outstanding are expected to net 49.8%. The options have terms of ten years from the date of grant and generally vest ratably over periods of one month to five years.
Transactions for stock options for the three months ended April 30, 2013, were as follows:
 
 
15

 
 
   
Number of
Shares
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
   
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
   
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
 
Outstanding at February 1, 2013
    1,285,303     $ 25.97       5.5     $ 1,784  
Granted
    194,576       21.08               -  
Forfeited
    (8,939 )     15.78               -  
Outstanding at April 30, 2013
    1,470,940       25.39       5.9       1,043  
                                 
Exercisable at February 1, 2013
    965,750       25.95       4.5       1,710  
Exercisable at April 30, 2013
    1,100,954       26.06       4.8       1,043  
 
The aggregate intrinsic value was calculated using the difference between the current market price and the exercise price for only those options that have an exercise price less than the current market price.
 
9.  Investment in Affiliates
 
The Company’s investments in affiliates are carried at the fair value of the investment considered at the date acquired, plus the Company’s equity in undistributed earnings from that date. These affiliates are engaged in mineral exploration drilling, infrastructure construction and the manufacture and supply of drilling equipment, parts and supplies.  A summary of directly owned affiliates, as well as their primary operating subsidiaries if applicable, and the percentages directly or indirectly owned by the Company are as follows as of April 30, 2013:
 
   
Percentage
Owned
Directly
   
Percentage
Owned
Indirectly
 
Boyles Bros Servicios Tecnicos Geologicos S.A. (Panama)
    50.00 %      
     Boytec, S.A. (Panama)
            50.00 %
     Boytec Sondajes de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
            50.00  
     Sondajes Colombia, S.A. (Colombia)
            50.00  
     Mining Drilling Fluids (Panama)
            25.00  
     Plantel Industrial S.A. (Chile)
            50.00  
Christensen Chile, S.A. (Chile)
    50.00          
Christensen Commercial, S.A. (Chile)
    50.00          
Geotec Boyles Bros., S.A. (Chile)
    50.00          
    Centro Internacional de Formacion S.A. (Chile)
            50.00  
    Geoestrella S.A. (Chile)
            25.00  
Diamantina Christensen Trading (Panama)
    42.69          
Christensen Commercial, S.A. (Peru)
    35.38          
Geotec, S.A. (Peru)
    35.38          
Boyles Bros., Diamantina, S.A. (Peru)
    29.49          
 
Financial information of the affiliates is reported with a one-month lag in the reporting period. The impacts of the lag on the Company’s investment and results of operations are not significant. Summarized financial information of the affiliates , including Diberil and its subsidiaries  in the April 30, 2012 amounts as it was prior to the May 30 date of acquisition of the remaining 50% equity interest, was as follows:
 
   
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Income statement data:
           
Revenues
  $ 68,480     $ 136,036  
Gross profit
    9,406       34,396  
Operating income
    286       21,531  
Net (loss) income
    (633 )     16,801  
 
10.  Operating Segments
 
The Company is a global solutions provider to the world of essential natural resources – water, minerals and energy. Management defines the Company’s operational organizational structure into discrete divisions based on its primary product lines. Each division comprises a combination of individual district offices, which primarily offer similar types of services and serve similar types of markets. Although individual offices within a division may periodically perform services normally provided by another division, the results of those services are recorded in the offices’ own division. For example, if a Mineral Exploration Division office performed water well drilling services, the revenues would be recorded in the Mineral Exploration Division rather than the Water Resources Division.
 
 
16

 
 
Effective with the start of fiscal 2014, operating responsibility for certain of our operations has changed.  Our Specialty Drilling group and operations in Ethiopia have been shifted from the Water Resources Division to the Mineral Exploration Division. We believe the shift more closely aligns our international operating expertise in the markets in which those groups operate. We have also shifted certain of our purchasing groups out of the Water Resources Division as they are now focusing on worldwide purchasing for all divisions. These purchasing groups, which also have some third party sales, are now grouped in our Other section. Information for prior periods has been reclassified to conform to our new presentation. We have also separated the Energy Services Division from Other and are presenting it as a separate segment. The Company’s segments are defined below.
 
Water Resources Division
 
The Water Resources Division provides every aspect of water supply system development and technology, including hydrologic design and construction, source of supply exploration, well and intake construction and well and pump rehabilitation. The division also brings new technologies to the water and wastewater markets and offers water treatment equipment engineering services, which supports the Company’s historic municipal business, providing systems for the treatment of regulated and “nuisance” contaminants, specifically, iron, manganese, hydrogen sulfide, arsenic, radium, nitrate, perchlorate, and volatile organic compounds. The Water Resources Division provides water systems and services in most regions of the U.S.
 
Inliner Division
 
Our Inliner Division provides a wide range of process, sanitary and storm water rehabilitation solutions to municipalities and industrial customers dealing with aging infrastructure needs. We focus on our proprietary Inliner® cured-in-pipe (“CIPP”) which allows us to rehabilitate aging sanitary sewer, storm water and process water infrastructure to provide structural rebuilding as well as infiltration and inflow reduction. Our trenchless technology minimizes environmental impact and reduces or eliminates surface and social disruption. We are unique in that the technology itself, the liner tube manufacturer and the largest installer of the Inliner CIPP technology are all housed within our family of companies. While we focus on our proprietary Inliner CIPP, we are committed to full system renewal. We also provide a wide variety of other rehabilitative methods including Janssen structural renewal for service lateral connections and mainlines, slip lining, traditional excavation and replacement, U-Liner high-density polyethylene fold and form and manhole renewal with cementitious and epoxy products. The Inliner Division provides services in most regions of the U.S.
 
Heavy Civil Division
 
Our Heavy Civil Division delivers sustainable solutions to government agencies and industrial clients by overseeing the design and construction of water and wastewater treatment plants and pipeline installation. In addition, Heavy Civil builds radial collector wells (Ranney Method), surface water intakes, pumping stations, hard rock tunnels and marine construction services-all in support of the world’s water infrastructure. Beyond water solutions, our Heavy Civil Division also designs and constructs biogas facilities (anaerobic digesters) for the purpose of generating and capturing methane gas, an emerging renewable energy resource.  The Heavy Civil Division provides services in most regions of the U.S.
 
Geoconstruction Division
 
We provide specialized geotechnical foundation construction services to the heavy civil, industrial, commercial and private construction markets around the globe. We have the expertise and equipment to provide the most appropriate deep foundation system, ground improvement and earth support solution to be applied given highly variable geological and site conditions. In addition, we offer extensive experience in successful completion of complex and schedule-driven major underground construction projects. We provide services that are focused primarily on the foundation systems for dams/levees, tunnels, shafts, utility systems, subways or transportation systems, commercial building and port facilities. Services offered include jet grouting, structural diaphragm and slurry cutoff walls, cement and chemical grouting, drilled piles, ground improvement and earth retention systems.  The Geoconstruction Division provides services in most regions of the U.S., as well as Brazil and Uruguay.
 
Mineral Exploration Division
 
Our Mineral Exploration Division conducts primarily aboveground drilling activities, including all phases of core drilling, reverse circulation, dual tube, hammer and rotary air-blast methods. Our service offerings include both exploratory (‘greenfield’) and definitional (‘brownfield’) drilling. Global mining companies hire us to extract samples from sites that the mining companies analyze for mineral content before investing heavily in development to extract the minerals. We help our clients determine if a minable mineral deposit exists on the site, the economic viability of mining the site and the geological properties of the ground, which helps in the determination of mine planning. Our primary markets are in the western U.S., Mexico, Australia, Brazil and Africa. We also have ownership interests in foreign affiliates operating in Latin America that form our primary presence in this market.
 
 
17

 

Energy Services Division
 
The Energy Services Division focuses on bringing responsible water management solutions to the exploration and production (E&P) industry’s growing water related challenges. In fiscal year 2014, we have begun to offer total water management solutions to our E&P clients that will encompass water sourcing, transfer, treatment and recycling. The Energy Services Division will provide services in most regions of the U.S.
 
Other
 
Other includes specialty and purchasing operations not included in one of the other divisions.
 
Financial information for the Company’s segments is presented below. Unallocated corporate expenses primarily consist of general and administrative functions performed on a company-wide basis and benefiting all segments. These costs include accounting, financial reporting, internal audit, treasury, corporate and securities law, tax compliance, executive management and board of directors. Corporate assets are all assets of the Company not directly associated with a segment, and consist primarily of cash and deferred income taxes.
 
 
18

 
 
   
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Revenues
           
Water Resources
  $ 44,412     $ 56,194  
Inliner
    30,280       34,368  
Heavy Civil
    73,840       72,871  
Geoconstruction
    21,587       24,205  
Mineral Exploration
    54,404       81,622  
Energy Services
    1,793       1,445  
Other
    4,933       1,731  
Intersegment eliminations
    (4,803 )     (671 )
Total revenues
  $ 226,446     $ 271,765  
                 
Equity in (losses) earnings of affiliates
               
Geoconstruction
  $ -     $ 1,932  
Mineral Exploration
    (481 )     5,830  
Total equity in (losses) earnings of affiliates
  $ (481 )   $ 7,762  
                 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
               
Water Resources
  $ (26 )   $ 1,461  
Inliner
    2,339       1,915  
Heavy Civil
    (1,493 )     (7,336 )
Geoconstruction
    (5,408 )     2,180  
Mineral Exploration
    1,138       18,632  
Energy Services
    (566 )     (617 )
Other
    158       672  
Unallocated corporate expenses
    (13,188 )     (8,372 )
Interest expense
    (1,298 )     (574 )
Total (loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
  $ (18,344 )   $ 7,961  
                 
                 
Product Line Revenue Information
               
Water systems
  $ 45,390     $ 54,671  
Water treatment technologies
    12,627       9,674  
Sewer rehabilitation
    30,280       34,368  
Water and wastewater plant construction
    44,137       34,122  
Pipeline construction
    19,577       31,232  
Soil stabilization
    24,896       31,770  
Environmental and specialty drilling
    545       3,380  
Exploration drilling
    47,930       71,425  
Energy Services
    1,064       1,123  
Total revenues
  $ 226,446     $ 271,765  
                 
Geographic Information
               
Revenue
               
United States
  $ 171,394     $ 213,040  
Africa/Australia
    13,359       27,369  
Mexico
    19,578       19,016  
Other foreign
    22,115       12,340  
Total revenues
  $ 226,446     $ 271,765  
 
11.  Discontinued Operations
 
The Company has continued to analyze its lines of business within each of its operating segments to align with the One Layne strategy. As part of this analysis, the Company has authorized, during the first quarter of fiscal year 2014, the sale of its SolmeteX operations. The Company is negotiating a sale of substantially all of the SolmeteX assets to a third party. The sale is expected to be completed before the end of the Company’s fiscal year. As of April 30, 2013, the Company considered SolmeteX as a discontinued operation and reflected it as such in the consolidated financial statements. SolmeteX was previously reported as part of the Water Resources Division. Major classes of assets and liabilities of SolmeteX reported as held for sale in the accompanying balance sheet are as follows:
 
 
19

 
 
(in thousands)
 
April 30,
2013
 
Accounts Receivable
  $ 1,069  
Inventory
    245  
Other Current Assets     50  
Property and equipment
       
    Leasehold Improvements
    23  
    Equipment
    217  
      240  
    Less accumulated depreciation
    (169 )
    Net property and Equipment
    71  
Intangible assets
    1,988  
Total Assets
  $ 3,423  
         
Other Liabilities
  $ 480  
 
During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company authorized the sale of the Energy Division and considered it a discontinued operation. The sale of the division was completed on October 1, 2012.
 
The financial results of the two discontinued operations are as follows:
 
   
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
       
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Revenues
  $ 1,862     $ 4,700  
Income (loss) before income taxes
    684       (1,079 )
Income tax (expense) benefit
    (267 )     434  
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
    417       (645 )
 
12.  Contingencies
 
The Company’s drilling activities involve certain operating hazards that can result in personal injury or loss of life, damage and destruction of property and equipment, damage to the surrounding areas, release of hazardous substances or wastes and other damage to the environment, interruption or suspension of drill site operations and loss of revenues and future business. The magnitude of these operating risks is amplified when the Company, as is frequently the case, conducts a project on a fixed-price, bundled basis where the Company delegates certain functions to subcontractors but remains responsible to the customer for the subcontracted work. In addition, the Company is exposed to potential liability under foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations, contractual indemnification agreements or otherwise in connection with its services and products. Litigation arising from any such occurrences may result in the Company being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting large claims. Although the Company maintains insurance protection that it considers economically prudent, there can be no assurance that any such insurance will be sufficient or effective under all circumstances or against all claims or hazards to which the Company may be subject or that the Company will be able to continue to obtain such insurance protection. A successful claim or damage resulting from a hazard for which the Company is not fully insured could have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, the Company does not maintain political risk insurance with respect to its foreign operations.
As previously reported, in connection with the Company updating its Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") policy, questions were raised internally in late September 2010 about, among other things, the legality of certain payments by the Company to agents and other third parties interacting with government officials in certain countries in Africa. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors engaged outside counsel to conduct an internal investigation to review these payments with assistance from outside accounting firms. The internal investigation has found documents and information suggesting that improper payments, which may violate the FCPA and other local laws, were made over a considerable period of time, by or on behalf of, certain foreign subsidiaries of the Company to agents and other third parties interacting with government officials in certain countries in Africa relating to the payment of taxes, the importing of equipment and the employment of expatriates. We have made a voluntary disclosure to the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") and the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") regarding the results of our investigation and we are cooperating with the DOJ and the SEC in connection with their review of the matter.
If violations of the FCPA or other local laws occurred, the Company could be subject to fines, civil and criminal penalties, equitable remedies, including profit disgorgement and related interest, and injunctive relief. Often, dispositions for these types of matters result in modifications to business practices and compliance programs and possibly a monitor being appointed to review future business and practices with the goal of ensuring compliance with the FCPA and other applicable laws. In addition, disclosure of the subject matter of the investigation could adversely affect the Company's reputation and its ability to obtain new business or retain existing business from its current clients and potential clients, to attract and retain employees and to access the capital markets. If it is determined that a violation of the FCPA has occurred, such violation may give rise to an event of default under the agreements governing our debt instruments if such violation were to have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, assets, property, financial condition or prospects or if the amount of any settlement resulted in the Company failing to satisfy any financial covenants. Additional potential FCPA violations or violations of other laws or regulations may be uncovered through the investigation.
 
 
20

 
 
In February 2012, we commenced discussions with the DOJ and SEC regarding the potential resolution of this matter. In May 2013, the staff of the SEC orally advised the Company that they calculated the estimated benefits to the Company from allegedly improper payments, plus interest thereon, to be approximately $4.8 million. As a result, the Company increased its accrued liability at April 30, 2013 for resolution of the FCPA investigation to $4.8 million from the $3.7 million that had been previously accrued.
The discussions with the government are ongoing, and other than the indication of the estimated disgorgement amount noted above, the Company has not received any proposed settlement offers from the SEC or DOJ, including any indications of the amount of any possible fines and penalties to be sought by the DOJ. At this time, the Company is not able to reasonably estimate the amount of any fine or penalty that it may have to pay to the DOJ as a part of any possible settlement or whether the SEC or DOJ will accept voluntary settlement terms that would be acceptable to the Company. Furthermore, the Company cannot currently assess the potential liability that might be incurred if a settlement is not reached and the government was to litigate the matter. As such, based on the information available at this time any additional liability related to this matter is not reasonably estimable. The Company will continue to evaluate the amount of its liability pending final resolution of the investigation and any related settlement discussions with the government; the amount of the actual liability for any fines, penalties, disgorgement or interest that may be recorded in connection with a final settlement could be significantly higher than the liability accrued to date.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company was notified that one of its banks in Africa had restricted access to all funds over a certain dollar amount and also received information that the bank may be ceasing operations. The Company has $2. 9 million in its accounts at the bank. The Company has engaged local advisors to assist in recovering its funds. The Company has recently learned that the bank may be in the process of becoming functional again. While the Company does not believe a loss is probable, the Company is not able to estimate the amount of funds, if any, which it might lose.
The Company is involved in litigation incidental to its business, the disposition of which is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by changes in the Company's assumptions related to these proceedings. In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, we record a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. To the extent additional information arises or the Company's strategies change, it is possible that the Company's estimate of its probable liability in these matters may change.
 
13.  Relocation
 
On December 6, 2012, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved the relocation of the Company's global corporate headquarters from Mission Woods, Kansas to The Woodlands, a suburb of Houston, Texas. The move will involve most executive positions in Layne's corporate leadership, as well as certain other management and staff positions. Most senior executives from Layne's six divisions will ultimately consolidate into the Houston headquarters. The relocation is expected to be substantially complete by the end of the fiscal year. To date, the Company has incurred expenses of $6,424,000, of which $3,726,000 were incurred in the three months ended April 30, 2013. The expenses are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated financial statements, and consist primarily of employee relocation costs, severance and employee retention arrangements. The Company expects to incur approximately $9,000,000 of additional expenses over the remainder of fiscal 2014.
 
 
Cautionary Language Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
 
This Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, statements of plans and objectives, statements of future economic performance and statements of assumptions underlying such statements, and statements of management’s intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations or predictions of the future. Forward-looking statements can often be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “should,” “intended,” “continue,” “believe,” “may,” “hope,” “anticipate,” “goal,” “forecast,” “plan,” “estimate” and similar words or phrases. Such statements are based on current expectations and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including but not limited to: the outcome of the ongoing internal investigation into, among other things, the legality, under the FCPA and local laws, of certain payments to agents and other third parties interacting with  government officials in certain countries in Africa relating to the payment of taxes, the importing of equipment and the employment of expatriates (including any government enforcement action which could arise out of the matters under review or that the matters under review may have resulted in a higher dollar amount of payments or may have a greater financial or business impact than management currently anticipates), prevailing prices for various commodities, the duration of the current slowdown in the Mineral Exploration market, unanticipated slowdowns in the Company’s major markets, the availability of credit, the risks and uncertainties normally incident to the construction industry, the ability of the Company to successfully obtain profitable contracts in the Heavy Civil and Energy Services Divisions, the impact of competition, the effectiveness of operational changes expected to increase efficiency and productivity, worldwide economic and political conditions and foreign currency fluctuations that may affect worldwide results of operations. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially and adversely from those anticipated, estimated or projected. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this filing, and the Company assumes no obligation to update such forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements.
 
Overview
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand Layne Christensen Company, our operations and our present business environment. MD&A is provided as a supplement to — and should be read in connection with — our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto included under Part I Item 1 of this report. MD&A should also be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements as of January 31, 2013, and for the year then ended, and the related MD&A, both of which are contained in our Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2013. MD&A includes the following sections:
 
 
Our Business — a general description of our business and key fiscal 2014 events.
 
 
21

 
 
 
Consolidated Review of Operations — an analysis of our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended April 30, 2013.
 
 
Operating Segment Review of Operations — an analysis of our results of operations for the three months ended April 30, 2013, as presented in our consolidated financial statements for our reporting segments:  Water Resources Division, Inliner Division, Heavy Civil Division, Geoconstruction Division, Mineral Exploration Division and Energy Services Division.
 
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources — an analysis of cash flows, aggregate financial commitments and certain financial condition ratios.
 
 
Critical Accounting Policies — a discussion of changes to our critical accounting policies in the current period that involve a higher degree of judgment or complexity. This section also includes the impact of new accounting standards.
 
Our Business
 
Layne is a global water management, construction and drilling company. We provide responsible solutions   for water, mineral and energy challenges. The Company’s operational and organizational structure is divided into six divisions based on primary service lines. Each division is comprised of individual district offices, which primarily offer similar services and serve similar markets. Periodically, individual offices within a division may perform services that are normally provided by another division. When that happens, the results of those services are recorded in the originating offices’ own division. For example, if a Mineral Exploration Division office performed water well drilling services, the revenues would be recorded in the Mineral Exploration Division rather than the Water Resources Division. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statement for a discussion of the Company’s segments.
 
Key Fiscal 2014 Events
 
Effective with the new fiscal year, operating responsibility of certain of our operations has been changed.  Our Specialty Drilling group and operations in Ethiopia have been shifted from the Water Resources Division to the Mineral Exploration Division.  We believe this shift more closely aligns these businesses with our international operating expertise. We have also shifted certain of our purchasing groups out of Water Resources as they are now focusing on worldwide purchasing for all divisions.  These groups, which also have some third party sales, are now grouped in our Other section.  Information for prior periods has been reclassified to conform to our new presentation.
The revenue in most of our divisions has declined as compared to a year ago. For the first quarter fiscal 2014, the Heavy Civil Division’s revenues have increased by 1.3 % compared to first quarter last year as we began to work on several new projects.
The Company’s Mineral Exploration Division continues to be impacted by the global mining exploration slowdown, both in the minerals exploration markets served by our wholly owned operations and our Latin America affiliates. For the first quarter of fiscal 2014, revenues in our Mineral Exploration Division have decreased 33.3% and pre-tax earnings have decreased by 93.9 % compared to last year.
During the first quarter, the Company assessed the need for a valuation allowance on the value of its deferred tax assets. As a result of  weakened forecast during the first quarter of domestic earnings for fiscal 2014 and beyond, the Company changed its expectations regarding its ability to fully utilize its foreign tax credit carryovers and recorded an additional $8.0 million valuation allowance.
On June 4, 2013, the Company amended its Credit Agreement to allow temporary covenant relief. Covenant requirements will be reinstated at their original levels beginning with the fiscal quarter ending January 31, 2014, and the Company expects to be in compliance with the temporary and reinstated covenants as applicable
During the first quarter of the fiscal year, the Company reclassified SolmeteX,  an operation within the Water Resources Division, primarily involved in the dental wastewater treatment market, as a discontinued operation pending its sale, which is expected by the end of the fiscal year.
 
Consolidated Review of Operations
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the percentage relationship which certain items reflected in the Company's consolidated statements of income bear to revenues and the percentage increase or decrease in the dollar amount of such items period to period.
 
 
22

 
 
                   
Period-to-
   
   
Three Months
     
Period
   
   
Ended April 30,
     
Change
   
   
2013
     
2012
     
Three
   
Revenues:
                 
Months
   
Water Resources
    19.6   %     20.7   %     (21.0 ) %
Inliner
    13.4         12.6         (11.9 )  
Heavy Civil
    32.6         26.8         1.3    
Geoconstruction
    9.5         8.9         (10.8 )  
Mineral Exploration
    24.0         30.0         (33.3 )  
Energy Services
    0.8         0.5         24.1    
Other
    2.2         0.7         185.0    
Intersegment eliminations
    (2.1 )       (0.2 )       615.8    
Total net revenues
    100.0       100.0   %     (16.7 )  
Cost of revenues
    (83.7 ) %     (80.5 ) %     (13.4 )  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    (18.5 )       (14.5 )       6.4    
Depreciation and amortization
    (6.7 )       (5.1 )       10.6    
Equity in (losses) earnings of affiliates
    (0.2 )       2.9         (106.2 )  
Interest expense
    (0.6 )       (0.2 )       126.1    
Other income, net
    1.7         0.4         237.9    
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
    (8.0 )       2.9         (330.4 )  
Income tax expense
    (2.6 )       (1.2 )       73.9    
Net (loss) income from continuing operations
    (10.6 )       1.7         (620.4 )  
                               
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations
    0.2         (0.2 )       (164.7 )  
Net (loss) income
    (10.4 )       1.5         (694.1 )  
Net (loss)  income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    0.0         (0.1 )       (71.5 )  
Net (loss) income attributable to Layne Christensen Company
    (10.4 )       1.4         (734.3 )  
 
Revenues, equity in earnings of affiliates and income before income taxes pertaining to the Company’s operating segments are presented below. Unallocated corporate expenses primarily consist of general and administrative functions performed on a company-wide basis and benefiting all operating segments. These costs include accounting, financial reporting, internal audit, safety, treasury, corporate and securities law, tax compliance, executive management and board of directors.
 
 
23

 
 
   
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Revenues
           
Water Resources
  $ 44,412     $ 56,194  
Inliner
    30,280       34,368  
Heavy Civil
    73,840       72,871  
Geoconstruction
    21,587       24,205  
Mineral Exploration
    54,404       81,622  
Energy Services
    1,793       1,445  
Other
    4,933       1,731  
Intersegment eliminations
    (4,803 )     (671 )
Total revenues
  $ 226,446     $ 271,765  
Equity in (losses) earnings of affiliates
               
Geoconstruction
  $ -     $ 1,932  
Mineral Exploration
    (481 )     5,830  
Total equity in (losses) earnings of affiliates
  $ (481 )   $ 7,762  
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
               
Water Resources
  $ (26 )   $ 1,461  
Inliner
    2,339       1,915  
Heavy Civil
    (1,493 )     (7,336 )
Geoconstruction
    (5,408 )     2,180  
Mineral Exploration
    1,138       18,632  
Energy Services
    (566 )     (617 )
Other
    158       672  
Unallocated corporate expenses
    (13,188 )     (8,372 )
Interest expense
    (1,298 )     (574 )
Total (loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
  $ (18,344 )   $ 7,961  
 
Revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2013, decreased $45.3 million, or 16.7%, to $226.4 million, compared to $271.8 million for the same period last year. Revenues decreased in all divisions except for Heavy Civil and Energy Services. A further discussion of results of operations by division is presented below.
Cost of revenues decreased $29.3 million, or 13.4%, to $189.6 million, or 83.7% of revenues, for the three months ended April 30, 2013, compared to $218.9 million, or 80.5% of revenues, for the same period last year. The increase in the cost as a percentage of revenues for the quarter was primarily in Geoconstruction where late stage work on certain projects generated lower margins and new projects were either delayed or canceled. In Mineral Exploration there was a substantial drop in revenues in the quarter with delays in getting proportionate cost reductions.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 6.4 % to $41.9 million for the three months ended April 30, 2013, compared to $39.4 million for the same period last year. The increase was primarily due to the costs associated with the relocation of the Company’s headquarters to The Woodlands, Texas of $3.7 million, $1.7 million of overhead expenses at Diberil (which was not consolidated in the same period last year) and an additional accrual of $1.0 million associated with the FCPA investigation, partially offset by $4.2 million of reduced compensation expenses.
Depreciation and amortization increased 10.6% to $15.3 million for the three months ended April 30, 2013, compared to $13.8 million for the same period last year. The increase was primarily the result of $1.1 million of expense associated with the Diberil acquisition.
Equity in (losses) earnings of affiliates decreased 106.2% to $(0.5) million for the three months ended April 30, 2013, compared to $7.8 million for the same period last year. The global decline in mineral exploration by our customers, as well as severance costs recorded by the affiliates as they have downsized, have accounted for this decrease in earnings.
Interest expense increased to $1.3 million for the three months ended April 30, 2013, compared to $0.6 million for the same period last year, as a result of increased borrowings to fund operations.
Other income, for the three months ended April 30, 2013 and 2012, consisted primarily of gains on equipment sales.
Income tax expense for continuing operations of $5.8 million was recorded in the three months ended April 30, 2013, compared to $3.3 million tax expense for the same period last year. The Company had a discrete period non-cash valuation allowance of $8.0 million against its foreign tax credits generated in prior years impacting income tax expense for the three months ended April 30, 2013. The effective tax rates for continuing operations for the three months ended April 30, 2013 and 2012, were (31.5)% and 41.8%. The discrete period item had a negative effect of 43.4% on the effective rate in the current quarter. The remaining difference in the effective rate as compared to the prior year was primarily due to the increase in the valuation allowance recorded against foreign tax credit carryovers generated in the current year and the mix of income or loss earned in tax jurisdictions in which the Company conducts its business operations.
 
 
24

 
 
Operating Segment Review of Operations
 
Water Resources Division
 
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Revenues
  $ 44,412     $ 56,194  
(Loss) income before income taxes
    (26 )     1,461  
 
Water Resources Division revenues decreased 21.0% for the three months ended April 30, 2013, from the same period last year. Revenues have declined in most areas of the United States, and most significantly in our injection well operations in Florida. The injection wells operation, which is included in the water systems product line, has seen a decrease in revenues in the first three months of this year of $4.9 million, due to what we believe is a temporary slowdown in deep injection well drilling projects in Florida. The decreased revenue volume across the division has offset the results of our efforts to reduce overhead costs, producing the slight loss for the quarter.
The backlog in the Water Resources Division was $55.5 million as of April 30, 2013, compared to $63.1 million as of January 31, 2013.
 
Inliner Division
 
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Revenues
  $ 30,280     $ 34,368  
Income before income taxes
    2,339       1,915  
 
Inliner Division revenues decreased for the quarter as a number of projects reached the final stages of completion. Third party sales of lining products to other contractors have continued their positive trend, and were up $1.6 million for the quarter.
        Despite the lower revenues, income before income taxes improved 22.1% for the division. This reflected positive margin adjustments as final contingencies were resolved on certain projects and the positive impact of the third party product sales.
The backlog in the Inliner Division was $68.9 million as of April 30, 2013, compared to $66.2 million as of January 31, 2013.
 
Heavy Civil Division
 
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Revenues
  $ 73,840     $ 72,871  
Loss before income taxes
    (1,493 )     (7,336 )
 
Heavy Civil revenues have increased during the first quarter of fiscal year 2014 due to the inclusion of the previously announced Islamorada project, offsetting planned reductions in our other operations as we complete legacy projects and pursue higher margin opportunities.
The loss for the division narrowed substantially, driven by higher margin new business, the completion of low margin legacy projects, and gains on the sale of excess equipment of $1.1 million. The division continues to analyze its expenses to determine efficiencies and reduce overhead costs.
The backlog in the Heavy Civil Division was $357.4 million as of April 30, 2013, compared to $395.7 million as of January 31, 2013.
 
Geoconstruction Division
 
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Revenues
  $ 21,587     $ 24,205  
(Loss) income before income taxes
    (5,408 )     2,180  
Equity in earnings of affiliates, included in above earnings
    -       1,932  
 
The revenues comparison to last year for the Geoconstruction Division is impacted by the acquisition of the remaining interest of Diberil, our affiliate in South America.  It is now consolidated in the financial statements and equity earnings are no longer recorded.   Diberil contributed $9.0 million in revenue in the first quarter. The revenues would have been higher, however a work stoppage which ended during the quarter on a project site delayed approximately three weeks worth of production. The positive revenue impact of consolidating Diberil was offset by lower revenue in our U.S. operations as a number of projects have been cancelled or delayed in the first quarter.
 
 
25

 
 
The unexpected project cancellations and delays in the U.S. and work stoppage in South America led to a divisional loss of $5.4 million for the quarter.
The backlog in the Geoconstruction Division was $41.5 million as of April 30, 2013, compared to $41.5 million as of January 31, 2013.
 
Mineral Exploration Division
 
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Revenues
  $ 54,404     $ 81,622  
Income before income taxes
    1,138       18,632  
Equity in (losses) earnings of affiliates, included in above earnings
  $ (481 )     5,830  
 
Mineral Exploration Division revenues decreased 33.3% for the three months ended April 30, 2013 as compared to the same period last year. The Division continues to experience the impact of the downturn in global exploration that was evident during the second half of fiscal 2013. Revenues were down significantly across most of the entire division as the delay in customer exploration is being seen in all of our markets.
During the first quarter of 2014, an additional accrual of $1.1 million associated with the FCPA investigation was also incurred (see Note 12).
Equity in (losses) earnings of affiliates experienced a change of (108.3)% over last year. They have also experienced the same market slowdown as in our wholly-owned operations and have incurred large severance charges as they adjust their workforce to reflect the decrease in mining activity.
    In response to the lower revenues, the division has aggressively moved to control and reduce costs.  The division remains profitable despite the downturn.
 
Energy Services Division
 
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Revenue
  $ 1,793     $ 1,445  
Loss before income taxes
    (566 )     (617 )
 
The Energy Services Division is still in the start-up phase. The revenues have increased by 24.1% over last year, and the Company expects revenues to increase as the year progresses and we introduce our solutions to the energy markets.
 
Other
 
Three Months
 
   
Ended April 30,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
   
2012
 
Revenues
  $ 4,933     $ 1,731  
Income before income taxes
    158       672  
 
Other revenues and income before income taxes are primarily from small specialty and purchasing operations. Although the majority of the revenues are eliminated between segments, the operations produce positive earnings from third party sales and purchasing discounts.
 
Unallocated Corporate Expenses
 
Corporate expenses not allocated to individual divisions, primarily included in selling, general and administrative expenses, were $13.2 million for the three months ended April 30, 2013, compared to $8.4 million for the same period last year. Approximately $3.7 million of the increase is due to the expenses related to the relocation of the Company’s headquarters to The Woodlands, Texas, as well as an increase of $1.0 million in legal and professional fees.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Management exercises discretion regarding the liquidity and capital resource needs of its business segments. This includes the ability to prioritize the use of capital and debt capacity, to determine cash management policies and to make decisions regarding capital expenditures. The Company’s primary sources of liquidity have historically been cash from operations, supplemented by borrowings under its credit facilities.  We believe that we have sufficient funds and adequate financial resources available to meet our anticipated liquidity needs. We also believe our cash balances and cash flow from operations will be sufficient in the next twelve months and foreseeable future to finance anticipated working capital requirements, capital expenditures and debt service requirements.
The Company maintains a $300 million revolving credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”) which extends to March 25, 2016. Under the Credit Agreement, on April 30, 2013, there were letters of credit of $24.3 million and $84.5 million borrowings outstanding on the Credit Agreement resulting in available capacity of $191.2 million.
The Company’s Credit Agreement contains certain covenants including restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness and liens, investments, acquisitions, transfer or sale of assets, transactions with affiliates and payment of dividends. These provisions generally allow such activity to occur, subject to specific limitations and continued compliance with financial maintenance covenants. Significant financial maintenance covenants are a fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio.
  
 
26

 
 
The financial covenants are based on defined terms included in the agreements, such as adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDAR. Compliance with the financial covenants is required on a quarterly basis, using the most recent four fiscal quarters.  Adjusted EBITDA is generally defined as consolidated net income excluding net interest expense, provision for income taxes, gains or losses from extraordinary items, gains or losses from the sale of capital assets, non-cash items including depreciation and amortization, and share-based compensation. Equity in earnings of affiliates is included only to the extent of dividends or distributions received. Adjusted EBITDAR is defined as adjusted EDITDA, plus rent expense. All of these measures are considered non-GAAP financial measures and are not intended to be in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The Company’s minimum fixed charge coverage ratio covenant is the ratio of adjusted EBITDAR to the sum of fixed charges.  Fixed charges consist of rent expense, interest expense, and principal payments of long-term debt. The Company’s leverage ratio covenant is the ratio of total funded indebtedness to adjusted EBITDA. Total funded indebtedness generally consists of outstanding debt, capital leases, unfunded pension liabilities, asset retirement obligations and escrow liabilities.
Based on recent and forecasted results of operations and projected levels of indebtedness, the Company’s compliance with its financial covenants at April 30, 2013 and over the balance of fiscal 2014 was in question. On June 4, 2013, the Company and its lenders amended the Credit Agreement to suspend the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and the maximum leverage ratio covenants for the fiscal quarters ending July 31 and October 31, 2013. These covenants will be reinstated at their original levels beginning with the fiscal quarter ending January 31, 2014.
The Credit Agreement was also amended to temporarily add minimum EBITDA and maximum capital expenditure covenants on a quarterly and fiscal year to date basis. The minimum EBITDA covenant applies through October 31, 2013, while the maximum capital expenditure covenant applies through January 31, 2014. The amendment also modified the definition of adjusted EBITDA to exclude up to $3 million per quarter of relocation expenses related to the move of the Company’s headquarters to The Woodlands, Texas. The actual covenant levels as of April 30, 2013, disclosed below are based on the amended definition.
 
As of April 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s actual and required covenant levels were as follows:
 
   
Actual
   
Required
   
Actual
   
Required
 
   
April 30,
2013
   
April 30,
2013
   
April 30,
2012
   
April 30,
2012
 
Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio
    1.99       1.50       2.66       1.50  
Maximum leverage ratio
    2.61       3.00       1.21       3.00  
 
In connection with the amendment, the Company and its domestic subsidiaries granted liens on substantially all of their assets, subject to certain exceptions, including a pledge of up to 65% of the equity interests in their first-tier foreign subsidiaries, to secure the Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement. The term of the agreement was not changed.
Prior to the amendment of the Credit Agreement, the Company also maintained a private shelf agreement whereby it could issue up to $150 million of unsecured notes before July 8, 2021. In connection with the Credit Agreement amendment, the shelf agreement was terminated. There were no outstanding notes at the time of the termination.
The Company’s working capital as of April 30, 2013 and January 31, 2013 was $ 108.4 million and $125.1 million, respectively. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents as of April 30, 2013, were $27.2 million, compared to $27.2 million as of January 31, 2013.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2014, the Company was notified that one of its banks in Africa had restricted access to all funds over a certain dollar amount and that the bank may be ceasing operations. The Company has $2.9 million in its accounts at the bank in question. The Company has engaged local advisors to assist in recovering its funds. The Company has recently learned that the bank is in the process of becoming functional again. At this time the Company is not able to estimate the amount of funds, if any, which it might lose. The funds have been classified as Restricted Deposits on the balance sheet as of April 30, 2013.
 
Operating Activities
 
Cash from operating activities was $10.8 million for the three months ended April 30, 2013 compared to cash used in operating activities of $2.0 million for the same period last year. The improvement was primarily due to working capital fluctuations during the quarter as earnings declined.

Investing Activities
 
The Company’s capital expenditures were $9.1 million for the three months ended April 30, 2013 compared to $16.4 million for the same period last year. With the recent declines in earnings, the Company has been restricting capital spending to primarily maintenance capital, with little growth capital other than in its start-up Energy Services Division. The Company expects to spend approximately $40 million for the fiscal year. The Company has continued to aggressively eliminate excess equipment amongst certain operations. These disposals, along with certain insurance proceeds, generated $5.2 million during the first quarter .
The Company maintains corporate owned life insurance policies on certain levels of management. During the first quarter, the Company redeemed certain of the policies which were no longer considered necessary. The redemptions resulted in net proceeds of $3.6 million.
 
Financing Activities
 
For the three months ended April 30, 2013, the Company had net repayments of borrowings of $10.5 million under its credit facilities as compared to net borrowings of $25.0 million a year ago. The improvement was a result of cash generated from working capital levels and the proceeds of the life insurance contracts noted above.
During the current period, the Company distributed $1.6 million of joint venture funds to its noncontrolling interests as the applicable projects neared completion.
During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the Company spent $2.7 million to acquire the noncontrolling interest in its Mineral Exploration subsidiary in Brazil.
 
 
27

 
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
For more information regarding our critical accounting policies, estimates and judgments, see the discussion under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2013. There have been no changes to our critical accounting policies since January 31, 2013.
 
 
The principal market risks to which the Company is exposed are interest rates on variable rate debt, and foreign exchange rates giving rise to translation and transaction gains and losses.
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
The Company centrally manages its debt portfolio considering overall financing strategies and tax consequences. A description of the Company’s debt is in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in the Company’s January 31, 2013 Form 10-K and Note 4 of this Form 10-Q. As of April 30, 2013, an instantaneous change in interest rates of one percentage point would impact the Company’s annual interest expense by approximately $0.9 million.
 
Foreign Currency Risk
 
Operating in international markets involves exposure to possible volatile movements in currency exchange rates. Currently, the Company’s primary international operations are in Australia, Africa, Mexico, Canada, Brazil and Italy. The Company’s affiliates also operate in South America and Mexico. The operations are described in Notes l and 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in the Company’s January 31, 2013, Form 10-K and Notes 9 and 10 of this Form 10-Q. The majority of the Company’s contracts in Africa and Mexico are U.S. dollar based, providing a natural reduction in exposure to currency fluctuations. The Company also may utilize various hedge instruments, primarily foreign currency option contracts, to manage the exposures associated with fluctuating currency exchange rates. As of April 30, 2013, the Company did have any outstanding foreign currency option contracts; to manage the exposures associated with fluctuating currency exchange rates. As of April 30, 2013, the Company did not have any outstanding foreign currency option contracts.
As currency exchange rates change, translation of the income statements of the Company’s international operations into U.S. dollars may affect year-to-year comparability of operating results. The Company estimates that a ten percent change in foreign exchange rates would have impacted income before income taxes by approximately $0.2 million for the three months ended April 30, 2013. This quantitative measure has inherent limitations, as it does not take into account any governmental actions, changes in customer purchasing patterns or changes in the Company’s financing and operating strategies.
 
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Based on an evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures for the period ended April 30, 2013, conducted under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer, the Company concluded that its disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management (including the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended April 30, 2013, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
PART II
 
 
As previously reported, in connection with the Company updating its Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") policy, questions were raised internally in late September 2010 about, among other things, the legality of certain payments by the Company to agents and other third parties interacting with government officials in certain countries in Africa. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors engaged outside counsel to conduct an internal investigation to review these payments with assistance from outside accounting firms. The internal investigation has found documents and information suggesting that improper payments, which may violate the FCPA and other local laws, were made over a considerable period of time, by or on behalf of, certain foreign subsidiaries of the Company to agents and other third parties interacting with government officials in certain countries in Africa relating to the payment of taxes, the importing of equipment and the employment of expatriates. We have made a voluntary disclosure to the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") and the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") regarding the results of our investigation and we are cooperating with the DOJ and the SEC in connection with their review of the matter.
 
 
28

 
 
If violations of the FCPA or other local laws occurred, the Company could be subject to fines, civil and criminal penalties, equitable remedies, including profit disgorgement and related interest, and injunctive relief. Often, dispositions for these types of matters result in modifications to business practices and compliance programs and possibly a monitor being appointed to review future business and practices with the goal of ensuring compliance with the FCPA and other applicable laws. In addition, disclosure of the subject matter of the investigation could adversely affect the Company's reputation and its ability to obtain new business or retain existing business from its current clients and potential clients, to attract and retain employees and to access the capital markets. If it is determined that a violation of the FCPA has occurred, such violation may give rise to an event of default under the agreements governing our debt instruments if such violation were to have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, assets, property, financial condition or prospects or if the amount of any settlement resulted in the Company failing to satisfy any financial covenants. Additional potential FCPA violations or violations of other laws or regulations may be uncovered through the investigation.
In February 2012, we commenced discussions with the DOJ and SEC regarding the potential resolution of this matter. In May 2013, the staff of the SEC orally advised the Company that they calculated the estimated benefits to the Company from allegedly improper payments, plus interest thereon, to be approximately $4.8 million. As a result, the Company increased its accrued liability at April 30, 2013 for resolution of the FCPA investigation to $4.8 million from the $3.7 million that had been previously accrued.
The discussions with the government are ongoing, and other than the indication of the estimated disgorgement amount noted above, the Company has not received any proposed settlement offers from the SEC or the DOJ, including any indications of the amount of any possible fines and penalties to be sought by the DOJ. At this time, the Company is not able to reasonably estimate the amount of any fine or penalty that it may have to pay to the DOJ as a part of any possible settlement or whether the SEC or DOJ will accept voluntary settlement terms that would be acceptable to the Company. Furthermore, the Company cannot currently assess the potential liability that might be incurred if a settlement is not reached and the government was to litigate the matter. As such, based on the information available at this time any additional liability related to this matter is not reasonably estimable. The Company will continue to evaluate the amount of its liability pending final resolution of the investigation and any related settlement discussions with the government; the amount of the actual liability for any fines, penalties, disgorgement or interest that may be recorded in connection with a final settlement could be significantly higher than the liability accrued to date.
The Company is involved in litigation incidental to its business, the disposition of which is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by changes in the Company's assumptions related to these proceedings. In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, we record a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. To the extent additional information arises or the Company's strategies change, it is possible that the Company's estimate of its probable liability in these matters may change.
 
 
There have been no significant changes to the risk factors disclosed under Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2013 .
 
 
NOT APPLICABLE
 
 
NOT APPLICABLE
 
 
Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K is included in Exhibit 95 to this Quarterly Report.
 
 
29

 
 
 
a) Exhibits
   
  4.1 Amendment No.1, dated as of September 27, 2012, to Credit Agreement dated as of March 25, 2011 among Layne Christensen Company, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto.
  4.2 Letter Amendment No.1, dated as of September 27, 2012, to Private Shelf Agreement dated as of July 8, 2011 among Layne Christensen Company, Prudential Investment Management, Inc., and each other Prudential Affiliate (as defined therein).
  10.1 Form of Performance Shares Agreement between the Company and Management of the Company for use with the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
 
31.1
-
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
 
31.2
-
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
 
32.1
-
Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
 
32.2
-
Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
 
95
-
Mine Safety Disclosures.
 
**101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
**101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
** 101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
**101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
**101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
**101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
* * * * * * * * * *
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
Layne Christensen Company
 
   
(Registrant)
 
       
       
       
DATE:                       June 10, 2013
/s/  Rene Robichaud  
 
Rene Robichaud, President
 
 
and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
     
       
       
DATE:                       June 10, 2013
/s/ James R. Easter
 
 
James R. Easter, Sr. Vice President
 
 
Finance and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
30
EXHIBIT 4.1
 
EXECUTION COPY
 
AMENDMENT NO. 1
 
Dated as of September 27, 2012
 
to
 
CREDIT AGREEMENT
 
Dated as of March 25, 2011
 
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (“ Amendment ”) is made as of September 27, 2012 (the “ Effective Date ”) by and among Layne Christensen Company, as Borrower (the “ Borrower ”),  the lenders listed on the signature pages hereof (the “ Lenders ”) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (the “ Administrative Agent ”), under that certain Credit Agreement dated as of March 25, 2011 by and among the Borrower, the Lenders and the Administrative Agent (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ”).  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement.
 
WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested that the Lenders and the Administrative Agent agree to make certain modifications to the Credit Agreement;
 
WHEREAS, the Borrower, the Lenders and the Administrative Agent have so agreed on the terms and conditions set forth herein;
 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above, the terms and conditions contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Borrower, the Lenders and the Administrative Agent hereby agree as follows.
 
1.             Amendments to the Credit Agreement .  Effective as of the Effective Date but subject to the satisfaction of the conditions precedent set forth in Section 2 below, the Credit Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
 
(a)            The definition of  “ Change in Law ” set forth in Section 1.01 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:
 
Change in Law ” means (a) the adoption of any law, rule, regulation or treaty after the date of this Agreement, (b) any change in any law, rule, regulation or treaty or in the interpretation or application thereof by any Governmental Authority after the date of this Agreement or (c) compliance by any Lender or the Issuing Bank (or, for purposes of Section 2.15(b), by any lending office of such Lender or by such Lender’s or the Issuing Bank’s holding company, if any) with any request, guideline or directive (whether or not having the force of law) of any Governmental Authority made or issued after the date of this Agreement; provided , however , that notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (i) the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and all requests, rules, guidelines, requirements and directives thereunder, issued in connection therewith or in implementation thereof, and (ii) all requests, rules, guidelines, requirements and directives promulgated by the Bank for International Settlements, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (or any successor or similar authority) or the United States or foreign regulatory authorities, in each case pursuant to Basel III, shall in each case be deemed a “Change in Law” regardless of the date enacted, adopted, issued or implemented.
 
 
 

 
 
(b)            The definition of “ Senior Note Agreement ” set forth in Section 1.01 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:
 
Senior Note Agreement ” means the Private Shelf Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2011, by and among the Borrower and the Senior Noteholders, as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented, replaced, refinanced or otherwise modified from time to time.
 
(c)            The definition of “ Priority Indebtedness ” set forth in Section 1.01 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:
 
Priority Indebtedness ” means, at any time, excluding the Indebtedness permitted by Section 6.01(i), the sum (without duplication) of (i) all Indebtedness of Borrower or any Subsidiary secured by a Lien (except Liens permitted by Sections 6.02(b), 6.02(e), and 6.02(f)), plus (ii) all Indebtedness (excluding trade payables) or preferred stock of Subsidiaries owed to (or, in the case of preferred stock, owned by) any Person other than the Borrower or a Subsidiary Guarantor; provided , that Priority Indebtedness shall not include (1) Indebtedness represented by Guarantees of the Obligations or Guarantees of the Indebtedness evidenced by the Senior Notes (so long as a similar Guarantee is provided to Administrative Agent) or (2) unsecured Indebtedness of any of the Loan Parties for so long as, in respect of Loan Parties that are Subsidiaries, such Subsidiary is a Subsidiary Guarantor, plus (iii) all preferred stock of Borrower or other capital stock of Borrower with any redemption rights.
 
(d)            Section 2.15(b) of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:
 
 
2

 
 
(b)           If any Lender or the Issuing Bank determines that any Change in Law regarding capital or liquidity requirements has or would have the effect of reducing the rate of return on such Lender’s or the Issuing Bank’s capital or on the capital of such Lender’s or the Issuing Bank’s holding company, if any, as a consequence of this Agreement or the Loans made by, or participations in Letters of Credit held by, such Lender, or the Letters of Credit issued by the Issuing Bank, to a level below that which such Lender or the Issuing Bank or such Lender’s or the Issuing Bank’s holding company could have achieved but for such Change in Law (taking into consideration such Lender’s or the Issuing Bank’s policies and the policies of such Lender’s or the Issuing Bank’s holding company with respect to capital adequacy or liquidity), then from time to time the Borrower will pay to such Lender or the Issuing Bank, as the case may be, such additional amount or amounts as will compensate such Lender or the Issuing Bank or such Lender’s or the Issuing Bank’s holding company for any such reduction suffered.
 
(e)            Section 6.01(c) of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:
 
(c)           Indebtedness of the Borrower to any Subsidiary and of any Subsidiary to the Borrower or any other Subsidiary; provided that Indebtedness of any Subsidiary that is not a Loan Party to any Loan Party shall be subject to the limitations set forth in Section 6.04(e);
 
(f)            Section 6.03(a)(vii) of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:
 
(vii)           the Borrower and its Subsidiaries may sell all or any part of Layne Energy’s Equity Interests or assets so long as no Event of Default is then outstanding or would result from the applicable sale; provided , that any guaranty of the Obligations by Layne Energy automatically shall be released if Layne Energy no longer constitutes a Subsidiary as a result of such a sale;
 
(g)            The introductory paragraph of Section 6.04 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:
 
The Borrower will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, purchase, hold or acquire (including pursuant to any merger or consolidation with any Person that was not a wholly owned Subsidiary prior to such merger or consolidation) any capital stock, evidences of indebtedness or other securities (including any option, warrant or other right to acquire any of the foregoing) of, make or permit to exist any loans or advances to, Guarantee any Indebtedness of, or make or permit to exist any investment or any other interest in, any other Person, or purchase or otherwise acquire (in one transaction or a series of transactions) any Person or any assets of any other Person constituting a business unit, except:
 
 
3

 
 
(h)            Section 6.04(e) of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:
 
(e)           investments, loans or advances made by the Borrower in or to any Subsidiary, or any Guarantee of Indebtedness of such Subsidiary, and made by any Subsidiary in or to the Borrower or any other Subsidiary, including a Guarantee by such Subsidiary; provided, that (i) not more than an aggregate amount of $60,000,000 in investments, loans, advances, Guarantees or capital contributions subsequent to the date of this Agreement may be made and remain outstanding, at any time, by Loan Parties to or in respect of Subsidiaries which are not Loan Parties; (ii) investments in Layne Energy shall only be made by the Borrower, and such investments shall only take the form of loans and advances made by the Borrower to Layne Energy; and (iii) no such investment, loan, advance, capital contribution, in or to, or Guarantee of Indebtedness of, a Subsidiary that is not a Loan Party, may be made at any time that a Default or an Event of Default exists or would result therefrom;
 
(i)            Section 6.04(n) of the Credit Agreement is hereby renumbered as Section 6.04(o) and a new Section 6.04(n) is added as follows:
 
(n)           Investments in respect of amounts on deposit in deposit accounts maintained by Foreign Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business; and
 
2.             Conditions of Effectiveness .  The effectiveness of this Amendment is subject to the following conditions precedent:
 
(a)           the Administrative Agent shall have received counterparts of this Amendment duly executed by the Borrower, the Lenders required to execute and deliver this Amendment in order to give effect hereto, and the Administrative Agent;
 
(b)           the Administrative Agent shall have received counterparts of a guaranty reaffirmation, in form and substance acceptable to the Administrative Agent, duly executed by the Subsidiary Guarantors in favor of the Administrative Agent;
 
(c)           the Administrative Agent shall have received a fully executed and effective copy of an amendment, in form and substance acceptable to it, to the Senior Note Agreement (as defined in the Credit Agreement, as amended hereby);
 
 
4

 
 
(d)           the Administrative Agent shall have received, on behalf of each Lender that delivers to the Administrative Agent its executed signature page hereto no later than 12:00 p.m. Chicago time on September 26, 2012 (as delivery shall be determined by the Administrative Agent in its sole discretion), a work fee equal to $5,000 for each such approving Lender; and
 
(e)           the Administrative Agent shall have received all other fees and amounts due and payable on or prior to the Effective Date, including, to the extent invoiced, reimbursement or payment of all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses required to be reimbursed or paid by the Borrower.
 
3.             Representations and Warranties of the Borrower .  The Borrower hereby represents and warrants as follows:
 
(a)            This Amendment and the Credit Agreement, as amended hereby, constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of the Borrower and are enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with their terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and subject to general principles of equity, regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law.
 
(b)            As of the date hereof and after giving effect to the terms of this Amendment, (i) no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing and (ii) the representations and warranties of the Borrower set forth in the Credit Agreement, as amended hereby, are true and correct as of the date hereof.
 
4.             Reference to and Effect on the Credit Agreement .
 
(a)            Upon the effectiveness of this Amendment, on and after the date hereof, each reference in the Credit Agreement to “this Agreement,” “hereunder,” “hereof,” “herein” or words of like import shall mean and be a reference to the Credit Agreement, as amended hereby.
 
(b)            Except as specifically amended above, the Credit Agreement and all other documents, instruments and agreements executed and/or delivered in connection therewith shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed.
 
(c)            The execution, delivery and effectiveness of this Amendment shall not operate as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of the Administrative Agent or the Lenders, nor constitute a waiver of any provision of the Credit Agreement or any other documents, instruments and agreements executed and/or delivered in connection therewith.
 
5.             Costs and Expenses .  The Borrower shall pay on demand all reasonable costs and expenses of the Administrative Agent (including the reasonable fees, costs and expenses of counsel to the Administrative Agent) incurred in connection with the preparation, execution and delivery of this Amendment.
 
6.             Governing Law .  THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND GOVERNED BY THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
 
7.             Execution .  This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts (and by different parties hereto on different counterparts), each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute a single contract.  Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Amendment by facsimile or other electronic imaging shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Amendment.
 
 
5

 
 
8.             Headings .  Section headings used herein are for convenience of reference only, are not part of this Amendment and shall not affect the construction of, or be taken into consideration in interpreting, this Amendment.
 
[Signature Pages Follow]
 
 
6

 
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed as of the day and year first above written.
 
 
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY,
as the Borrower
   
   
 
By    /s/ Jerry W. Fanska
   
Name:  Jerry W. Fanska
   
Title:  Senior Vice President Finance -
Treasurer
 
      
   
 
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., individually as a Lender, as the Swingline Lender, as the Issuing Bank and as Administrative Agent
   
   
 
By    /s/ R. Todd Hovermale
   
Name:  R. Todd Hovermale
   
Title:  Vice President
   
   
 
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as a Lender
   
   
 
By    /s/ Dianne M. Smith
 
Name:  Dianne M. Smith
 
Title:  Senior Vice President
   
   
 
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as a Lender
   
 
By    /s/ David Bentzinger
 
Name:  David Bentzinger
 
Title:  Senior Vice President
   
   
 
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as a Lender
   
   
 
By    /s/ Patrick Engel
 
Name:  Patrick Engel
 
Title:  Vice President
 
 
Signature Page to
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement

 
 
 
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as a Lender
   
   
 
By    /s/ Kathleen H. Gound
 
Name:  Kathleen H. Gound
 
Title: Vice President
   
   
 
BANK OF THE WEST, as a Lender
   
   
 
By    /s/ Roger Lumley
 
Name:  Roger Lumley
 
Title:  Senior Vice President
   
   
 
UMB BANK, N.A., as a Lender
   
   
 
By    /s/ S. Scott Heady
 
Name:  S. Scott Heady
 
Title:  Senior Vice President
   
   
 
BOKF, N.A., as a Lender
   
   
 
By    /s/ Dennis Nicely
 
Name: Dennis Nicely
 
Title: Senior Vice President
 
Signature Page to
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement
EXHIBIT 4.2
 
 
LETTER AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO PRIVATE SHELF AGREEMENT


September 27, 2012


Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and
each other Prudential Affiliate party hereto


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We refer to the Private Shelf Agreement dated as of July 8, 2011 (as in effect immediately prior to the effectiveness hereof, the “ Initial Agreement ” and after giving effect hereto, the “ Agreement ”) between Layne Christensen Company, a Delaware corporation (the “ Company ”),   Prudential Investment Management, Inc. (“ Prudential ”) and the Purchasers of the Notes (as defined therein) issued and sold by the Company from time to time.  Unless otherwise defined herein, the terms defined in the Agreement shall be used herein as therein defined.

The Company and  Prudential have agreed to amend certain of the terms and provisions contained in the Initial Agreement, all under the terms and conditions set forth in this Letter Amendment No. 1 to Private Shelf Agreement (this “ Amendment ”).

Therefore, for good and valuable consideration, it is hereby agreed by you and us as follows:

1.             Amendment to the Agreement.   Subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Section 2 hereof and the accuracy of the representations and warranties set forth in Section 3 hereof, Prudential and the Noteholders hereby agree with the Company to amend, effective as of the date first above written, the Initial Agreement as follows:

a.           Section 10.3(a)(vii) of the Initial Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

(vii)           the Company and its Subsidiaries may sell all or any part of Layne Energy’s Equity Interests or assets so long as no Event of Default is then outstanding or would result from the applicable sale; provided, that any Guaranty by Layne Energy under the Subsidiary Guaranty shall be automatically released if Layne Energy is no longer a Subsidiary as a result of such a sale;

b.           The introduction to Section 10.4 of the Initial Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
 
 
 

 
 
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, purchase, hold or acquire (including pursuant to any merger or consolidation with any Person that was not a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary prior to such merger or consolidation) any capital stock, evidences of indebtedness or other securities (including any option, warrant or other right to acquire any of the foregoing) of, make or permit to exist any loans or advances to, Guaranty any Indebtedness of, or make or permit to exist any investment or any other interest in, any other Person, or purchase or otherwise acquire (in one transaction or a series of transactions) any Person or any assets of any other Person constituting a business unit, except:

c.           Section 10.4(e) of the Initial Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

(e)           investments, loans or advances made by the Company in or to any Subsidiary, or any Guaranty of Indebtedness of such Subsidiary, and made by any Subsidiary in or to the Company or any other Subsidiary, including a Guaranty by such Subsidiary; provided, that (i) not more than an aggregate amount of $60,000,000 in investments, loans, advances, Guaranties or capital contributions subsequent to the date of this Agreement may be made and remain outstanding, at any time, by Note Parties to or in respect of Subsidiaries which are not Note Parties; (ii) investments in Layne Energy shall only be made by the Company, and such investments shall only take the form of loans and advances made by the Company to Layne Energy; and (iii) no such investment, loan, advance, capital contribution, in or to, or Guaranty of Indebtedness of, a Subsidiary that is not a Note Party, may be made at any time that a Default or an Event of Default exists or would result therefrom;

d.           Section 10.4(n) of the Initial Agreement is hereby renumbered as Section 10.4(o),  the word “and” occurring at the end of Section 10.4(m) is hereby removed,  and a new Section 10.4(n) is added as follows:

(n)           Investments in respect of amounts on deposit in deposit accounts maintained by Foreign Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business; and

e.           Schedule B of the Initial Agreement is hereby amended by amending and restating the definition of “Priority Indebtedness” in its entirety as follows:

 “ Priority Indebtedness ” means, at any time, excluding the Indebtedness permitted by Section 10.1(i), the sum (without duplication) of (i) all Indebtedness of Company or any Subsidiary secured by a Lien (except Liens permitted by Sections 10.2(b), 10.2(e), and 10.2(f)), plus (ii) all Indebtedness (excluding trade payables) or Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries owed to (or, in the case of Preferred Stock, owned by) any Person other than the Company or a Subsidiary Guarantor; provided, that Priority Indebtedness shall not include (1) Indebtedness represented by Guaranties of the Obligations (as defined in the Senior Credit Agreement) (so long as a similar Guaranty is executed for the benefit of the holders) or Guaranties of the Indebtedness in respect of the obligations of the Company and the Subsidiaries under the Note Documents or (2) unsecured Indebtedness of any of the Loan Parties for so long as, in respect of Note Parties that are Subsidiaries, such Subsidiary is a Subsidiary Guarantor, plus (iii) all Preferred Stock of Company or other capital stock of the Company with any redemption rights.
 
 
-2-

 
 
2.             Effectiveness.   This Amendment shall be effective on and as of the date first written above (the “ Effective Date ”), subject to the satisfaction of the conditions precedent that Prudential shall have received each of the following, in form, scope and substance satisfactory to Prudential:

(a)           the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and Prudential shall have duly executed and delivered this Amendment;

 (b)           a fully executed and effective copy of Amendment No. 1 to the Senior Credit Agreement, duly executed and delivered by each of the parties thereto;

(c)           (i) the Company shall be in full compliance with all of the terms and conditions of the Note Documents, and (ii) no Event of Default or Default shall have occurred and be continuing thereunder or shall result after giving effect to this Amendment; and

(d)           the Company shall have paid on or before the date hereof the reasonable fees, charges and disbursements of Baker Botts L.L.P. to the extent reflected in a statement of such counsel rendered to the Company at least one Business Day prior to the date hereof.

3.             Representations and Warranties.   In order to induce Prudential to enter into this Amendment, the Company hereby represents and warrants as follows:

(a)           The execution, delivery and performance by the Company of this Amendment and all documents to be executed and delivered in connection herewith have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action  and do not and will not (i) contravene, result in any breach of, or constitute a default under, or result in the creation of any Lien in respect of any property of the Company or any Subsidiary under, any indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, loan, purchase or credit agreement, lease, or any other agreement or instrument in an amount (whether constituting principal or otherwise) of at least $10,000,000 or corporate charter or by-laws to which the Company or any Subsidiary is bound, (ii) conflict with or result in a breach of any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any order, judgment, decree, or ruling of any court, arbitrator or Governmental Authority applicable to the Company or any Subsidiary or (iii) violate any provision of any statute or other rule or regulation of any Governmental Authority applicable to the Company or any Subsidiary.
 
 
-3-

 
 
(b)           Each of the representations and warranties contained in Section 5 of the Agreement is true and correct on and as of the date hereof, except to the extent that any such representation or warranty relates to a specific date, in which case such representation or warranty was true and correct as of such specified date.

(c)           No Default or Event of Default exists, either before or immediately after giving effect to this Amendment and the transactions contemplated hereby, under the Agreement or any other Note Document or any of the other documents executed in connection therewith.

4.             Miscellaneous.

(a)           Upon and after the date first above written, each reference to the Agreement in the Agreement and the other Note Documents shall mean and be a reference to the Initial Agreement as amended by this Amendment.

(b)           Except as specifically amended herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and is hereby ratified and confirmed.

(c)           The Company confirms its agreement, pursuant to Section 15.1 of the Agreement, to pay promptly all reasonable expenses of Prudential related to this Amendment and all matters contemplated hereby, including, without limitation, all reasonable fees and expenses of Prudential's counsel as described in Section 2(d) above.

(d)           Except as expressly provided herein, the execution, delivery and effectiveness of this Amendment shall not operate as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of Prudential, nor constitute a waiver of any provision of the Agreement or any other document, instrument or agreement executed and delivered in connection with any of the foregoing.

(e)            This Amendment shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and the rights of the parties shall be governed by, the law of the State of New York .

(f)           This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an original (whether such counterpart is originally executed or an electronic or facsimile copy of an executed original), but all such counterparts together shall constitute but one and the same instrument; signature pages may be detached from multiple separate counterparts and attached to a single counterpart so that all signature pages are physically attached to the same document.  Delivery of this Amendment may be made by telecopy or electronic transmission of a duly executed counterpart copy hereof; provided that any such delivery by electronic transmission shall be effective only if transmitted in .pdf format, .tif format or other format in which the text is not readily modifiable by any recipient thereof.
 
 
-4-

 
 
5.             Affirmation of Obligations.   Notwithstanding that such consent is not required under the Subsidiary Guaranty, each of the Subsidiary Guarantors consents to the execution and delivery of this Amendment by the parties hereto.  As a material inducement to the undersigned to amend the Agreement as set forth herein, each of the Subsidiary Guarantors (i) acknowledges and confirms the continuing existence, validity and effectiveness of the Subsidiary Guaranty, and (ii) agrees that the execution, delivery and performance of this Amendment shall not in any way release, diminish, impair, reduce or otherwise affect its obligations thereunder.

If you agree to the terms and provisions hereof, please evidence your agreement by executing and returning a counterpart of this Amendment (in a format acceptable in accordance with Section 4(f)) to Layne Christensen Company, 1900 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Mission Woods, KS 66205, Attention of Jerry Fanska, Senior Vice President Finance (Telecopy No. 913-362-8823; Telephone No. 913-677-6858), Email jerry.fanska@laynechristensen.com; with a copy to Layne Christensen Company, 1900 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Mission Woods, KS 66205, Attention of Steven Crooke, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Email steve.crooke@layne.com.

[ Remainder of this page intentionally left blank]
 
 
-5-

 
 
 
Very truly yours,
 
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY
     
 
By
/s/ Jerry W. Fanska
 
 
Name: Jerry W. Fanska
   
Title:  Senior Vice President Finance -
   
   Treasurer
 
 
SIGNATURE PAGE LETTER AMENDMENT NO. 1

 
 
For purposes of Section 5:
 
 
BOYLES BROS. DRILLING COMPANY;
 
CHRISTENSEN BOYLES CORPORATION;
 
INTERNATIONAL DIRECTIONAL SERVICES, L.L.C.;
 
LAYNE TEXAS, INCORPORATED;
 
MID-CONTINENT DRILLING COMPANY;
 
SHAWNEE OIL & GAS, L.L.C.;
 
STAMM-SCHEELE INCORPORATED;
 
VIBRATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.;
 
LAYNE ENERGY, INC.;
 
LAYNE ENERGY CHERRYVALE, LLC;
 
LAYNE ENERGY CHERRYVALE PIPELINE, LLC;
 
LAYNE ENERGY DAWSON, LLC;
 
LAYNE INTERNATIONAL, LLC;
 
WINDSOR RESOURCES, LLC;
 
WINDSOR RESOURCES PIPELINE, LLC;
 
LAYNE ENERGY HOLDING, LLC;
 
LAYNE ENERGY OPERATING, LLC;
 
LAYNE ENERGY OSAGE, LLC;
 
LAYNE ENERGY PIPELINE, LLC;
 
LAYNE ENERGY PRODUCTION, LLC;
 
LAYNE ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.;
 
LAYNE ENERGY SYCAMORE, LLC;
 
LAYNE ENERGY SYCAMORE PIPELINE, LLC;
 
LAYNE WATER DEVELOPMENT AND STORAGE, LLC;
 
CHERRYVALE PIPELINE, LLC;
 
LAYNE HEAVY CIVIL, INC.;
 
INLINER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC;
 
LINER PRODUCTS, LLC;
 
LAYNE INLINER, LLC;
 
LAYNE TRANSPORT CO.;
 
COLLECTOR WELLS INTERNATIONAL, INC.;
 
INTERNATIONAL WATER CONSULTANTS, INC.;
 
INLINER AMERICAN, INC.;
 
MAG CON, INC;
 
MEADORS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.;
 
W.L. HAILEY & COMPANY, INC.;
 
BENCOR CORPORATION OF AMERICA—FOUNDATION    SPECIALIST; AND
 
LAYNE SOUTHWEST, INC.
 
 
By
/s/ Jerry W. Fanska
 
 
Name: Jerry W. Fanska
   
Title:  Vice President of each of the above entities
 
 
SIGNATURE PAGE LETTER AMENDMENT NO. 1

 
 
This Amendment is hereby
accepted and agreed to as
of the date hereof.
 
PRUDENTIAL INVESTMENT
  MANAGEMENT, INC.
 
By:
/s/ William Bulmer
 
 
Vice President
 
 
SIGNATURE PAGE LETTER AMENDMENT NO. 1
Exhibit 10.1
Form of Performance Shares Agreement for LTI Plan Awards
June 2013
 
 
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY
2006 EQUITY  INCENTIVE PLAN
 
Performance Shares Agreement
 
 
  Date of Grant:     ________________  
         
  Number of Performance Shares Granted:    ________________  
 
This Award Agreement   dated _____________________, is made by and between Layne Christensen Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and ____________________ ("Participant").

RECITALS:
 
A.           Effective June 8, 2006, the Company's stockholders initially approved the Layne Christensen Company 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to which the Company may, from time to time, grant Performance Shares to eligible Service Providers of the Company.
 
B.           The Plan has been amended and restated several times and was most recently restated effective June 7, 2012.
 
C.           Participant is a Service Provider of the Company or one of its Affiliates and the Company desires to encourage him/her to own Shares and to give him/her added incentive to advance the interests of the Company, and desires to grant Participant Performance Shares under the terms and conditions established by the Committee.
 
AGREEMENT:
 
In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
 
1.            Incorporation of Plan .  All provisions of this Award Agreement and the rights of Participant hereunder are subject in all respects to the provisions of the Plan and the powers of the Committee therein provided.  Capitalized terms used in this Award Agreement but not defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Plan.
 
2.            Grant of Performance Shares .   Subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth in this Award Agreement and in the Plan, the Company hereby grants to Participant and credits to a separate account maintained on the books of the Company ("Account") that number of Performance Shares identified above opposite the heading "Number of Performance Shares Granted" (the "Performance Shares").  Each Performance Share shall represent Participant's conditional right to receive a percentage of a Share (the "Payout Percentage," which may be less than, equal to, or greater than 100%) on the Performance Shares' "Settlement Date" if the applicable performance and time-vesting requirements set forth in this Award Agreement are satisfied.  Participant's interest in the Account shall make him or her only a general, unsecured creditor of the Company.  Neither the Performance Shares nor Participant's rights thereto may be sold, transferred, gifted, bequeathed, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, voluntarily or involuntarily.  The rights of Participant with respect to each Performance Share shall remain forfeitable at all times prior to the Settlement Date of such Performance Share.
 
 
 

 
 
3.             Settlement of Performance Shares .   Following the end of the Performance Period (described below) and after the Committee has determined and certified the actual level of goal achievement of the performance goals, the Performance Shares shall be settled by delivering to Participant or his or her beneficiary, as applicable, a number of Shares equal to the achieved Payout Percentage multiplied by the Performance Shares then held by Participant which are vested in accordance with this Section 3.  Except as specifically provided elsewhere under the Plan, the Performance Shares subject to this Award Agreement shall become vested and be settled on (or within the 30-day period following) the date of such Committee determination and certification (each a "Settlement Date") as described below and based on the level of goal achievement during the performance period from __________ to __________ (the "Performance Period"):
 
[**Insert applicable vesting and performance conditions/goals**]
 
 
4.             Cancellation of Performance Shares; Delayed Vesting on Account of Retirement .   Unless otherwise provided in this Section 4 or in the Plan, if, prior to the Settlement Date, Participant's position as a Service Provider to the Company or any of its Affiliates is terminated, Participant shall thereupon immediately forfeit any and all unsettled Performance Shares and Participant shall have no further rights under this Award Agreement.  For purposes of this Award Agreement, the transfer of employment between the Company and any of its Affiliates (or between Affiliates) shall not constitute a termination of Participant's position as a Service Provider.
 
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if before the Settlement Date the Participant's position as a Service Provider with the Company or any Affiliate terminates on account of Participant's Retirement, then none of the Performance Shares shall be forfeited at the time of such Retirement and, provided that one or more of the above performance conditions are satisfied, on the Settlement Date, a number of Performance Shares equal to the Vesting Fraction (as defined below) multiplied by the number of Performance Shares that ultimately would have been settled on the Settlement Date if, but for the Retirement, Participant had remained employed through the Settlement Date (rounded up to the nearest whole share) shall be settled and the remaining Performance Shares will be forfeited.  The “Vesting Fraction” shall be a fraction, the numerator of which shall be the number of days from the Date of Grant to the date of Participant's Retirement and the denominator of which shall be the number of days during the applicable Performance Period.  For purposes of this Agreement, "Retirement" means the Participant's termination from all employment after attaining the age of 60 and after having been employed by the Company or one of its Affiliates for five years or more.
 
5.            Dividends and Voting .  Before any Performance Shares' Settlement Date, Participant shall be entitled to receive dividend equivalent payments for any dividends paid by the Company on Shares, whether payable in stock, in cash or in kind, or other distributions, declared as of a record date that occurs on or after the Date of Grant hereunder and prior to any cancellation or settlement of such Performance Shares, provided, however, that any such dividend equivalent payments shall be held in escrow by the Company and, be subject to the same rights, restrictions on transfer, and conditions applicable to the underlying Performance Shares.  Participant shall only be entitled to receive a payment of any accrued dividend equivalent payments on that number of Performance Shares that ultimately vests on the Settlement Date and, in the event of cancellation of any or all of the Performance Shares due to either Participant's termination of employment before the Settlement Date (other than a Retirement) or the above-described performance conditions not having been met, Participant will forfeit all dividend equivalent payments held in escrow and relating to the underlying forfeited Performance Shares.  Participant will have no voting rights with respect to any of the Performance Shares.  Any payment relating to accrued dividend equivalent payments will be paid within 30 days of the Settlement Date.
 
 
2

 
 
6.            Withholding with Stock .  Unless specifically denied by the Committee, Participant may elect to pay all minimum required amounts of tax withholding, or any part thereof, by electing that the Company withhold from the settlement of Shares otherwise eligible to be issued pursuant to this Award Agreement, Shares having a value equal to the minimum amount required to be withheld under federal, state or local law or such lesser amount as may be elected by Participant. The value of Shares to be withheld by the Company shall be based on the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the date that the amount of tax to be withheld is to be determined (the “Tax Date”), as determined by the Committee. Any such elections by Participant to have Shares withheld for this purpose will be subject to the following restrictions:
 
(a)           All elections must be made prior to the Tax Date;
 
(b)           All elections shall be irrevocable; and
 
(c)           If Participant is an officer or director of the Company within the meaning of Section 16 of the 1934 Act (“Section 16”), Participant must satisfy the requirements of such Section 16 and any applicable rules thereunder with respect to the use of Stock to satisfy such tax withholding obligation.
 
7.            Titles .  Titles are provided herein for convenience only and are not to serve as a basis for interpretation or construction of this Award Agreement.
 
8.            Amendment .  Subject to Section 10, this Award Agreement may be amended only by a writing executed by the parties hereto which specifically states that it is amending this Award Agreement.
 
9.            Governing Law .  The laws of the State of Delaware will govern the interpretation, validity and performance of this Award Agreement regardless of the law that might be applied under principles of conflicts of laws.
 
10.            Section 409A Compliance .   It is the intent of the Company that all payments made under this Award Agreement will either be exempt from Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury regulations and guidance issued thereunder ("Section 409A") pursuant to the “short-term deferral” exemption or compliant with Section 409A.   Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan or this Award Agreement to the contrary, (i) this Award Agreement shall not be amended in any manner that would cause any amounts payable hereunder that are not subject to Section 409A to become subject thereto (unless they also are in compliance therewith), and the provisions of any purported amendment that may reasonably be expected to result in such non-compliance shall be of no force or effect with respect to this Award Agreement and (ii) the Company, to the extent it deems necessary or advisable in its sole discretion, reserves the right, but shall not be required, to unilaterally amend or modify this Award Agreement to reflect the intention that all payments pursuant hereto qualify for exemption from or complies with Section 409A in a manner that as closely as practicable achieves the original intent of this Award Agreement and with the least reduction, if any, in overall benefit to a Participant to comply with Section 409A on a timely basis, which may be made on a retroactive basis, in accordance with regulations and other guidance issued under Section 409A.  Neither the Company nor the Board makes any representation that this Award Agreement shall be exempt from or comply with Section 409A and makes no undertaking to preclude Section 409A from applying to this Award Agreement.

11.            Binding Effect .  Except as expressly stated herein to the contrary, this Award Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
 
This Award Agreement has been executed and delivered by the parties hereto.
 
 
The Company:   Participant:  
       
Layne Christensen Company
   
       
       
 By:___________________________  _________________________________   
   Name:  Name:  
   Title:  Address of Participant:  
 
 
 
 
                                                                                    


                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                                                                                     
 
3
Exhibit 31.1
 
 
CERTIFICATIONS


I, Rene J. Robichaud, certify that:
 
1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2013, of Layne Christensen Company;
 
2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4.           The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 
(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
(b)           Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
(d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
5.           The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date:   June 10, 2013
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Rene  Robichaud
 
Rene J. Robichaud
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2
 
CERTIFICATIONS


I, James R. Easter, certify that:
 
1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2013, of Layne Christensen Company;
 
2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4.           The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 
(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
(b)           Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
(d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
5.           The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date:  June 10, 2013
 
 
 
 
/s/  James R. Easter
 
James R. Easter
 
Senior Vice President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer


I, Rene J. Robichaud, President and Chief Executive Officer of Layne Christensen Company (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a)           the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2013, which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)           the information contained in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2013, which this certification accompanies, fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
     
       
Date :   June 10, 2013
 
/s/ Rene Robichaud  
   
Rene J. Robichaud
 
   
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
       
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Principal Accounting Officer


I, James R. Easter, Senior Vice President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer, of Layne Christensen Company, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a)           the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2013, which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)           the information contained in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2013, which this certification accompanies, fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
     
       
Date :  June 10, 2013
 
/s/  James R. Easter  
   
James R. Easter
 
   
Senior Vice President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer
 
       
Exhibit 95.1
Mine Safety Disclosures

Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”) requires companies to disclose in their periodic reports information about the coal and other mines at which they are an operator.  The operations of the Company at coal and other mines in the U.S. are inspected by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) on an ongoing basis.
In evaluating the information regarding mine safety and health, investors should take into account the fact that the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act (the “Mine Act”) has been construed as authorizing MSHA to issue citations and orders pursuant to the legal doctrine of strict liability, or liability without fault. If, in the opinion of an MSHA inspector, a condition that violates the Mine Act or regulations promulgated pursuant to it exists, then a citation or order will be issued regardless of whether the operator had any knowledge of, or fault in, the existence of that condition. Many of the Mine Act standards include one or more subjective elements, so that issuance of a citation or order often depends on the opinions or experience of the MSHA inspector.
Whenever MSHA believes that a violation of the Mine Act, any health or safety standard, or any regulation has occurred, it may issue a citation or order which describes the violation and fixes a time within which the operator must abate the violation. In some situations, such as when MSHA believes that conditions pose a hazard to miners, MSHA may issue an order requiring cessation of operations, or removal of miners from the area of the mine, affected by the condition until the hazards are corrected.
Citations and orders can be contested before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (the "Commission"), and as part of that process, are often reduced in severity and amount, and are sometimes dismissed. The Commission is an independent adjudicative agency that provides administrative trial and appellate review of legal disputes arising under the Mine Act. These cases may involve, among other questions, challenges by operators to citations, orders and penalties they have received from MSHA.

The table that follows reflects citations, orders, violations and proposed assessments issued to the Company by MSHA during the quarter ended April 30, 2013 and all pending legal actions as of April 30, 2013.  Due to timing and other factors, the data may not agree with the mine data retrieval system maintained by MSHA.
 
Mine or Operating
Name/MSHA
Section
104
S&S
(#)
Section
104(b)
Orders
(#)
Section
104(d) Citations
and
Orders
(#)
Section
110(b)(2) Violations
(#)
Section
107(a)
Orders
(#)
Total Dollar Value of
MSHA
($)
Total
Number
of
Mining Related Fatalities
(#)
Received
Notice of Pattern of Violations Under
Section
104(e)
(yes/no)
Received Notice of Potential
to Have Pattern
under
Section
104(e)
(yes/no)
Legal
Actions Pending
as of
Last Day of Period
(#)
Legal
Actions Initiated During
Period
(#)
Legal
Actions Resolved During
Period
(#)
Hycroft
             
No
No
     
Swift Creek
Outside Lake
City, Florida
             
No
No
     
Mosaic –
Hookers Prairie
             
No
No
     
Boron
Operations
             
No
No
     
CR Briggs
             
No
No
     
Barrick Gold,
Turguoise Ridge
             
No
No
     
ISP Minerals
             
No
No
     
Gold Corp
Marigold Mine
             
No
No
     
Barrick Ruby
Hill
             
No
No
     
Barrick Golden Sunlight
             
No
No
     
Barrick/ Kinross
Round Mountain
Gold
             
No
No
     
Newmont,
Buffalo Valley
             
No
No
     
 
 
 

 
 
Nevada Copper
             
No
No
     
Cemex
             
No
No
4
   
Barrick Cortez
             
No
No
     
FMI Sierrita
Mine, AZ
             
No
No
     
Jim Walters
             
No
No
     
Nyrstar Young
             
No
No
     
Nyrstar
Gordonsville
             
No
No
     
Drummond
             
No
No
     
Carmeuse
             
No
No
     
Morgan Worldwide
             
No
No
     
Carmeuse
             
No
No
     
Lafarge NA
             
No
No
     
Lafarge
             
No
No
     
Lhoist NA
             
No
No
     
Mingo Logan
             
No
No
     
US Gypsum
             
No
No
     
Sweetwater
             
No
No
     
Libson Vallet
             
No
No
     
Twenty Mile
Coal
             
No
No
     
Barrick Goldstrike
             
No
No
     
URS Morenci
             
No
No
     
Freeport-
McMoRan
Sierrita
             
No
No
     
Cyprus Tohono
Corp.
             
No
No
     
Sun Valley Plant
             
No
No
     
CML Metals
             
No
No
     
FMI Bagdad
             
No
No
     
FMI Morenci
             
No
No
     
FMI Miami
             
No
No
     
Twin Buttes
             
No
No
     
FMI – Tyrone
             
No
No
     
Newmont-Carlin
             
No
No
     
Silver Bell
Mining
             
No
No
     
Allied NV
Hycroft
             
No
No
     
Imerys Plant #1
             
No
No
     
PCS Phosphates
             
No
No
     
Noranda Alumina
             
No
No
     
Agnico Eagle-
West Pequop
             
No
No
     
Allied NV Gold-
Hycroft Mine
             
No
No
     
Allied NV –
Hasbrook
             
No
No
     
AMEC-Sullivan
Ranch
             
No
No
     
American
Lithium
Minerals-
             
No
No
     
Asacro-Chilito
             
No
No
     
Asarc-Mission
             
No
No
     
Asarco-Ray
             
No
No
1
   
Asarco-Silver Bell
             
No
No
     
Barrick Arturo
(Dee)
             
No
No
     
Barrick Bald.
Mt.
             
No
No
     
 
 
 

 
 
Barrick Cortez
             
No
No
     
Barrick EXP
Surf & UG
             
No
No
     
Barrick
Turquoise Ridge
Surf/UG
             
No
No
     
Barrick-
Goldstrike
             
No
No
     
Barrick-
Goldstrike UG
             
No
No
     
Barrick-Ruby
Hill
             
No
No
     
BH Minerals-
             
No
No
     
BHP-Pinto
Valley
             
No
No
     
Canamex
Resources-
Bruner
             
No
No
     
Cayden
Resources US
Inc-Quartz MT.
             
No
No
     
Centerra-Ren
             
No
No
     
Coeur
Rochester-
Rochester
             
No
No
     
Comstock-
             
No
No
     
Cooper One-
             
No
No
     
Dynasty Gold
             
No
No
     
Evolving Gold
Corp.
             
No
No
     
Freeport
McMoRan-
Bagdad
             
No
No
     
Freeport
McMoRan-
Christmas Mine
             
No
No
     
Freeport
McMoRan-
Chino
             
No
No
     
Freeport
McMoRan-
Dragoon
             
No
No
     
Freeport
McMoRan-
Miami
             
No
No
     
Freeport
McMoRan-
Morenci
             
No
No
     
Freeport
McMoRan-
Safford
             
No
No
     
Freeport
McMoRan-
Sierrita
             
No
No
     
Freeport
McMoRan-
Twin Buttes
             
No
No
     
Fronteer
Development–
Long Cany.
             
No
No
     
Gold Acquisition
Corp.
             
No
No
     
Gold Reef-Rim
Rock
             
No
No
     
Gold Standard
Ventures-
Railroad
             
No
No
     
Golden Predator-
             
No
No
     
 
 
 

 
 
Golden Vertex –
Moss Mine
             
No
No
     
Great Basin
Gold-
Ivanhoe/Hollister
             
No
No
     
Gryphon Gold-
Borealis
             
No
No
     
Harvest Gold-
Rosebud
             
No
No
     
JR Simplot –
Soda Springs
             
No
No
     
Kennecott UT
Copper-
Bingham
             
No
No
     
Klondex-Fire
Creek
             
No
No
     
Marigold
             
No
No
     
Meridian Gold-
             
No
No
     
Metallic
Ventures-
Converse
             
No
No
     
Metallic
Ventures-Gold
Field
             
No
No
     
Mettalic
Ventures-
Gemfield
             
No
No
     
Midway-Pancake
             
No
No
     
Mineral Ridge
             
No
No
     
Minerals
Technology
             
No
No
     
Miranda Gold
             
No
No
     
Montezuma-Red
Canyon
             
No
No
     
Musgrove
Mineral
             
No
No
     
Nevada Copper-
Pumpkin
             
No
No
     
Newmont-Carlin
             
No
No
     
Newmont
Exploration
             
No
No
     
Newmont Genex
             
No
No
     
Newmont
Leeville
             
No
No
     
Newmont-
Lonetree
             
No
No
     
Newmont
McCoy Cove
             
No
No
     
Newmont-Midas
Surf / UG
             
No
No
     
Newmont
Phoenix
             
No
No
     
Newmont Twin-
Creeks
             
No
No
     
Northgate
Minerals
             
No
No
     
Oracle Ridge
Mining
             
No
No
     
Paramount Gold
and Silver
             
No
No
     
Paris Hills
Agricom
             
No
No
     
Pilot Gold
             
No
No
     
Premier Gold
Mines-
             
No
No
     
Quadra Mining-
Robinson
             
No
No
     
Quaterra
Resources-
             
No
No
     
 
 
 

 
 
Regal Resources
– Camp Verde
             
No
No
     
Renaissance
Gold – Spruce
MT
             
No
No
     
Rio Tinto-
Resolution
             
No
No
     
Romarco
Minerals-Haile
Gold Mine
             
No
No
     
Round Mt. Gold
             
No
No
     
Rye Patch Gold
             
No
No
     
Snowstorm LLC
             
No
No
     
Solitario Exp-
Mt. Hamilton
             
No
No
     
Talon Gold- N.
Bullfrog
             
No
No
     
Tatmar Ventures
             
No
No
     
TGC Holdings
             
No
No
     
Thompson Creek
Mining
             
No
No
     
Trio Gold
             
No
No
     
US Gold-
             
No
No
     
Victoria Res.
             
No
No
     
Vista NV
             
No
No
     
Western Pacific
Resources
             
No
No
     
WPC Resources
             
No
No
     
WK Mining
             
No
No
     
Yukon NV Gold
– Surface
             
No
No
     
Heritage Coal
             
No
No
     
Carmeuse Lime
             
No
No
     
Hilltop Basic
Resources
             
No
No
     
Hilltop Basic
Resources
             
No
No
     
Noranda
Alumin S.
Flourocarbon
             
No
No
     
Noranda
Alumina East
Flourocarbon
             
No
No
     
Carmeuse
             
No
No
     
Carmeuse
             
No
No
     
Imery's
             
No
No
     

A citations, orders and assessments reflected above are those initially issued or proposed by MSHA.  They do not reflect subsequent changes in the level of severity of a citation or order or the value of an assessment that may occur as a result of proceedings conducted in accordance with MSHA rules and regulations.

The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (the “Commission”) is an independent adjudicative agency that provides administrative trial and appellate review of legal disputes arising under the Mine Act. As of April 30, 2013, the Company has a total of 5 matters pending before the Commission.  All of these matters concern contests of citations or orders issued under section 104 of the Mine Act, along with the contests of the proposed penalties for each of these. During the quarter ended April 30, 2013, 0 actions were instituted before the Commission and 0 matters were resolved.