NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Recent Developments

Middlesex Water Company (Middlesex or the Company) is the parent company and sole shareholder of Tidewater Utilities, Inc. (Tidewater), Tidewater Environmental Services, Inc. (TESI), Pinelands Water Company (Pinelands Water) and Pinelands Wastewater Company (Pinelands Wastewater) (collectively, Pinelands), Utility Service Affiliates, Inc. (USA), Utility Service Affiliates  (Perth Amboy) Inc. (USA-PA), and Twin Lakes Utilities, Inc. (Twin Lakes). Southern Shores Water Company, LLC (Southern Shores) and White Marsh Environmental Systems, Inc. (White Marsh) are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Tidewater. The financial statements for Middlesex and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Company) are reported on a consolidated basis. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The consolidated notes within the 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the 2014 Form 10-K) are applicable to these financial statements and, in the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary (including normal recurring accruals) to present fairly the financial position as of September 30, 2015, the results of operations for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 and cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. Information included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2014, has been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 included in the 2014 Form 10-K.

Recent Accounting Guidance

As previously disclosed in the 2014 Form 10-K, in May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an update to authoritative guidance related to revenue from contracts with customers. The update replaces most of the existing guidance with a single set of principles for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. The FASB has deferred the effective date of these new revenue recognition standards by one year to January 1, 2018.

In April 2015, the FASB issued an update to authoritative guidance related to the presentation of debt issuance costs on the balance sheet, requiring companies to present debt issuance costs as a direct deduction from the carrying value of debt, which the Company will adopt beginning January 1, 2016. The new guidance must be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented. The adoption of this guidance will have no impact on the Company’s statement of income or cash flows and will not have a material impact on the Company’s balance sheet.

There are no other new adopted or proposed accounting guidance that the Company is aware of that could have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters

Middlesex - In August 2015, Middlesex’s Petition to the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU) seeking permission to increase base water rates was concluded, based on a negotiated settlement, resulting in an increase in annual operating revenues of $5.0 million. The base water rate increase request of $9.5 million, filed in March 2015, was necessitated by declining consumption by Middlesex’s Commercial and Industrial class customers, increasing benefit costs for active and retired employees, capital infrastructure investments and regulation-driven increases in other operations and maintenance costs. The new base water rates are designed to recover the increased costs and lost revenues, as well as a return on invested capital in rate base of $219.0 million, based on a return on equity of 9.75%. The rate increase became effective on August 29, 2015. Concurrent with the increase Middlesex was required to reset its Distribution System Improvement Charge (DSIC) to zero. A DSIC is a rate-mechanism that allows water utilities to recover investments in, and generate a return on, qualifying capital improvements to their water distribution system made between base rate proceedings. The Middlesex DSIC had been in effect since May 2015, and had generated less than $0.1 million of revenues.

Tidewater - Effective July 1, 2015, Tidewater’s Delaware Public Service Commission-approved DSIC was increased from 0.31% to 0.37%. Total annual revenues under the Tidewater DSIC are expected to amount to approximately $0.1 million.

Pinelands – In October 2015, Pinelands Water and Pinelands Wastewater filed separate petitions with the NJBPU seeking permission to increase base rates by approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million per year, respectively. These requests were necessitated by capital infrastructure investments both companies have made, or have committed to make, increased operations and maintenance costs and lower non-fixed fee revenues for both companies. We cannot predict whether the NJBPU will ultimately approve, deny, or reduce the amount of the requests. A decision by the NJBPU in either matter is not expected until the third quarter of 2016.

Note 3 – Capitalization

Common Stock

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, there were 48,414 common shares (approximately $1.1 million) and 54,627 common shares (approximately $1.1 million), respectively, issued under the Middlesex Water Company Investment Plan (the Investment Plan), a direct share purchase and sale and dividend reinvestment plan for Middlesex common stock. In July 2015, the Company filed a registration statement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission registering an additional 700,000 common shares for potential issuance under the Investment Plan.

Long-term Debt

In 2014, the NJBPU approved Middlesex’s request to borrow up to $5.0 million through the New Jersey Environmental Infrastructure Trust (NJEIT) under the New Jersey State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan program. This loan was intended to fund the current year RENEW Program, which is our ongoing initiative to clean and cement all unlined mains in the Middlesex system. Due to administrative changes in the New Jersey SRF loan program, participants are now required to complete construction of the qualifying project prior to closing on a long-term loan or, in the alternative, enter into a construction loan agreement with the NJEIT until the project is complete. At that time, the construction loan can be rolled into the next NJEIT long-term loan. Middlesex is currently reviewing the impact of these new requirements. These changes, along with an assessment of the condition of the mains subject to rehabilitation under the current year RENEW Program, will delay the project until 2016. During the fourth quarter of 2015, Middlesex expects to file an update to its petition with the NJPBU seeking approval to modify the previous granted financing timetable to accommodate the New Jersey SRF loan program changes.

In the second quarter of 2015, the NJEIT de-obligated future principal payments of $0.5 million on Series FF SRF long-term debt.

In 2014, Tidewater completed a $15.0 million debt transaction. Through September 30, 2015, Tidewater has drawn down $13.0 million, including $5.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. $11.0 million of the loan is at a fixed interest rate of 4.46% and $2.0 million is at a market-based variable interest rate. The proceeds were used to pay down short-term debt and for other general corporate purposes. In October 2015, Tidewater drew down the remaining $2.0 million at a market-based variable interest rate. Those funds are expected to be used for general corporate purposes. The interest rates on loans that are variable can be fixed at Tidewater’s discretion. The final maturity date of all borrowings under this loan agreement is April 2040.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosure for financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The carrying amounts reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, accounts payable and notes payable approximate their respective fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt relating to First Mortgage and SRF Bonds (Bonds) is based on quoted market prices for similar issues. Under the fair value hierarchy, the fair value of cash and cash equivalents is classified as a Level 1 measurement and the fair value of the Bonds in the table below are classified as Level 2 measurements. The carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s bonds were as follows:

For other long-term debt for which there was no quoted market price and there is not an active trading market, it was not practicable to estimate their fair value (for details, including carrying value, interest rate and due date on these series of long-term debt, please refer to those series noted as “Amortizing Secured Note” and “State Revolving Trust Note” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Capital Stock and Long-Term Debt). The carrying amount of these instruments was $53.6 million at September 30, 2015 and $50.8 million at December 31, 2014. Customer advances for construction have carrying amounts of $20.9 million and $22.0 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Their relative fair values cannot be accurately estimated since future refund payments depend on several variables, including new customer connections, customer consumption levels and future rate increases.

Note 4 – Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (EPS) are computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period presented. Diluted EPS assumes the conversion of both the Convertible Preferred Stock $7.00 Series and the Convertible Preferred Stock $8.00 Series.

Note 5 – Business Segment Data

The Company has identified two reportable segments. One is the regulated business of collecting, treating and distributing water on a retail and wholesale basis to residential, commercial, industrial and fire protection customers in parts of New Jersey, Delaware and Pennsylvania. This segment also includes regulated wastewater systems in New Jersey and Delaware. The Company is subject to regulations as to its rates, services and other matters by New Jersey, Delaware and Pennsylvania with respect to utility services within these states. The other segment is primarily comprised of non-regulated contract services for the operation and maintenance of municipal and private water and wastewater systems in New Jersey and Delaware. Inter-segment transactions relating to operational costs are treated as pass-through expenses. Finance charges on inter-segment loan activities are based on interest rates that are below what would normally be charged by a third party lender.

Note 6 – Short-term Borrowings

As of September 30, 2015, the Company has established lines of credit aggregating $60.0 million. At September 30, 2015, the outstanding borrowings under these credit lines were $18.0 million at a weighted average interest rate of 1.20%.

The weighted average daily amounts of borrowings outstanding under the Company’s credit lines and the weighted average interest rates on those amounts were as follows:

The maturity dates for the $18.0 million outstanding as of September 30, 2015 are all in October 2015 and are extendable at the discretion of the Company.

Interest rates for short-term borrowings under the lines of credit are below the prime rate with no requirement for compensating balances.

Note 7 – Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

Water Supply

Middlesex has an agreement with the New Jersey Water Supply Authority (NJWSA) for the purchase of untreated water through November 30, 2023, which provides for an average purchase of 27 million gallons a day (mgd). Pricing is set annually by the NJWSA through a public rate making process. The agreement has provisions for additional pricing in the event Middlesex overdrafts or exceeds certain monthly and annual thresholds.

Middlesex also has an agreement with a non-affiliated regulated water utility for the purchase of treated water. This agreement, which expires February 27, 2021, provides for the minimum purchase of 3 mgd of treated water with provisions for additional purchases.

Tidewater contracts with the City of Dover, Delaware to purchase 15.0 million gallons of treated water annually.

Purchased water costs are shown below:

Contract Operations - USA-PA operates the City of Perth Amboy, New Jersey’s (Perth Amboy) water and wastewater systems under a 20-year agreement, which expires in 2018. In connection with the agreement with Perth Amboy, USA-PA entered into a 20-year subcontract with a wastewater operating company for the operation and maintenance of the Perth Amboy wastewater collection system. The subcontract provides for the sharing of certain fixed and variable fees and operating expenses.

Guarantees - In September 2013, Middlesex entered into an agreement with the County of Monmouth, New Jersey (Monmouth County) to serve as guarantor of the performance of Applied Water Management, Inc. (AWM) to design, construct and operate a leachate pretreatment facility at the Monmouth County Reclamation Center in Tinton Falls, New Jersey. Middlesex expects to act as guarantor of AWM’s performance through at least August 2018 and is contractually obligated to act as guarantor of AWM’s performance through 2028 unless another guarantor acceptable to Monmouth County is identified. Construction of the facility, which is being financed by Monmouth County, is substantially complete and the facility is currently in the testing phase. Middlesex also entered into agreements with AWM and Natural Systems Utilities, Inc. (NSU), the parent company of AWM. Under these agreements, Middlesex earns a fee for providing the guaranty of AWM’s performance to Monmouth County, Middlesex provides operational support to the project, and AWM and NSU, serving as guarantor to Middlesex with respect to the performance of AWM, indemnify Middlesex against any claims that may arise under the Middlesex guaranty to Monmouth County.

Middlesex believes it is unlikely any payments would need to be made under Middlesex’s guaranty of AWM’s performance to Monmouth County. If asked to perform under the guaranty to Monmouth County, and, if AWM and NSU, as guarantor to Middlesex, do not fulfill their obligations to indemnify Middlesex against any claims that may arise under the Middlesex guaranty to Monmouth County, Middlesex would be required to fulfill the construction and operational commitments of AWM. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the liability recognized in Other Non-Current Liabilities on the balance sheet for the guaranty is approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

Construction

The Company has budgeted approximately $22.4 million for its construction program in 2015. The actual timing and amount of capital expenditures is dependent on project scheduling and refinement of engineering estimates for certain projects.

Litigation

The Company is a defendant in lawsuits in the normal course of business. We believe the resolution of pending claims and legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Change in Control Agreements

The Company has Change in Control Agreements with certain of its officers that provide compensation and benefits in the event of termination of employment in connection with a change in control of the Company.

Note 8 – Employee Benefit Plans

Pension Benefits

The Company’s Pension Plan covers all active employees hired prior to April 1, 2007. Employees hired after March 31, 2007 are not eligible to participate in this plan, but do participate in a defined contribution plan that provides an annual contribution at the discretion of the Company, based upon a percentage of the participants’ compensation. In order to be eligible for contribution, the eligible employee must be employed by the Company on December 31st of the year to which the contribution relates. For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company made Pension Plan cash contributions of $1.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively. For the nine months September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company made Pension Plan cash contributions of $2.0 million and $2.5 million, respectively. The Company expects to make Pension Plan cash contributions of approximately $1.3 million over the remainder of the current calendar year. The Company also maintains an unfunded supplemental retirement benefit plan for certain active and retired Company officers and currently pays $0.3 million in annual benefits to the retired participants.

Other Postretirement Benefits

The Company’s retirement plan other than pensions (Other Benefits Plan) covers substantially all of its current retired employees. Employees hired after March 31, 2007 are not eligible to participate in this plan. Coverage includes healthcare and life insurance. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company did not make any Other Benefits Plan cash contributions. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company made Other Benefits Plan cash contributions of $0.5 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company made Other Benefits Plan cash contributions of $0.8 million and $0.9 million, respectively. The Company expects to make Other Benefits Plan cash contributions of approximately $0.3 million over the remainder of the current calendar year.

The following tables set forth information relating to the Company’s periodic costs for its employee retirement benefit plans:

Note 9 – Income Taxes

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued final regulations pertaining to the deductibility of costs that qualify as repairs on tangible property. The regulations, which the Company adopted by filing a change in accounting method request with its 2014 Federal income tax return, redefine the characteristics previously used by the Company to determine tax deductibility of expenditures associated with tangible property. Under the regulations, the IRS has provided guidelines for certain industries, but not for regulated public water utilities. Consequently, the Company undertook a comprehensive study to support the adoption and integration of the new regulations into its tax policies prospectively, and to also determine the level of deductibility for income tax purposes for expenditures incurred on projects completed in prior years where such expenditures were capitalized, but may now be considered currently deductible as repairs under the new regulations. Included in its 2014 Federal income tax return, filed in September 2015, the Company submitted support which results in a net reduction of $17.6 million in taxes due to the federal government. While the Company believes that the deduction for qualifying tangible property repair costs included in its tax return is proper, it could be challenged under an examination by the IRS. Therefore, the Company has recorded a provision of $2.3 million against refundable taxes. The Company believes that the net operating loss carry-forward resulting from adoption of the regulations (approximately $7.8 million) is more likely than not to be recovered.

It is probable that any net tax benefits that resulted from adopting the study findings will be considered in determining the revenue requirement used to set base rates for the Company in a future regulatory proceeding. Consequently, adoption of the new regulations did not and will not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements or effective tax rate. Adoption of these new regulations resulted in a $10.3 million receivable for federal income taxes ($0.5 million of which is current), a $1.5 million increase in regulatory assets for additional expenses incurred expected to be recovered from customers in the future, a $5.0 million decrease in accrued taxes for the amount of refund applied against future tax payments and a $16.8 million increase in accumulated deferred income taxes.