As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2012.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
__________________________
FORM F-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
__________________________
BIOLINERX LTD.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
State of Israel
|
2834
|
Not Applicable
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
__________________________
BioLineRx Ltd.
P.O. Box 45158
19 Hartum Street
Jerusalem 91450, Israel
(972) (2) 548-9100
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
Vcorp Services, LLC
25 Robert Pitt Drive, Suite 204
Monsey, New York 10952
(Name, Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
Copies of all correspondence to:
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:
As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.
x
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to be registered
|
Amount to be registered
|
Proposed maximum offering price per security (2)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate offering price
|
Amount of registration fee
|
|
Ordinary Shares, par value NIS 0.01 per share(1)
|
52,443,010
|
U.S.$0.32(3)
|
U.S.$16,781,764
|
U.S.$1,924
|
|
Warrants to purchase American Depositary Shares
|
2,622,157
|
--
|
--
|
(4)
|
|
Ordinary Shares underlying the warrants
|
26,221,570
|
U.S.$0.36(5)
|
U.S.$9,439,766
|
U.S.$1,082
|
(1) American depositary shares evidenced by American depositary receipts issuable upon deposit of the ordinary shares registered hereby have been registered pursuant to a separate registration statement on Form F-6 (File No. 333-175360). Each American depositary share represents ten (10) ordinary shares.
(2) Pursuant to Rule 416(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this registration statement shall be deemed to cover additional securities that may be offered or issued to prevent dilution resulting from splits, dividends or similar transactions.
(3) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(c) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, based on the average of the high and low sales prices of the ADSs on the Nasdaq Capital Market on February 27, 2012.
(4) No fee pursuant to Rule 457(g).
(5) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(g) based on the exercise price of the warrants.
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state or jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED FEBRUARY 29, 2012
American Depositary Shares Representing Ordinary Shares
and
Warrants to Purchase American Depositary Shares
______________________________
This prospectus relates to the resale, by the selling shareholders identified in this prospectus, of (i) up to an aggregate of 5,244,301 American Depository Shares, or ADSs, each representing ten (10) of our ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.01 per share (“Ordinary Shares”), (ii) up to an aggregate of 2,622,157 of our warrants (the “warrants”) to purchase ADSs (the “warrant ADSs”) and (iii) up to an aggregate of 2,622,157 warrant ADSs. The selling shareholders are identified in the table commencing on page 107. The ADSs and the warrants held by these selling shareholders are being registered hereunder pursuant to previously disclosed purchase agreements between each of the selling shareholders and us. No ADSs or warrants are being registered hereunder for sale by us. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the ADSs or the warrants by the selling shareholders. All net proceeds from the sale of the ADSs and the warrants covered by this prospectus will go to the selling shareholders. However, we may receive the proceeds from any exercise of warrants if the holders do not exercise the warrants on a cashless basis. See “Use of Proceeds.”
Our ADSs are quoted on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “BLRX.” On February 27, 2012, the closing price of our ADSs on the Nasdaq Capital Market was US$ 3.10 per ADS.
Our ordinary shares currently trade on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange under the symbol “BLRX.” On February 27, 2012, the last reported sale price of our ordinary shares was NIS 1.209, or $0.32 per share (based on the exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel on such date).
______________________________
Investing in our ordinary shares involves a high degree of risk.
See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7.
Neither the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Israel Securities Authority nor any state or other foreign securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus
is truthful or complete
. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
______________________________
The date of this prospectus is ____________, 2012
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus and any free writing prospectus prepared by or on our behalf. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this prospectus. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not offering to sell or solicit any security other than the American Depositary Shares and the warrants offered by this prospectus. In addition, we are not offering to sell or solicit any securities to or from any person in any jurisdiction where it is unlawful to make this offer to or solicit an offer from a person in that jurisdiction. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate as of the date on the front of this prospectus only, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of our ordinary shares. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.
We have obtained the statistical data, market data and other industry data and forecasts used throughout this prospectus from publicly available information and from reports we commissioned. We have not sought the consent of the sources to refer to the publicly available reports in this prospectus
.
______________________________
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
1
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
F-1
|
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to “BioLineRx,” “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” and similar designations refer to BioLineRx Ltd. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: BioLine Innovations Jerusalem Ltd., or BIJ Ltd.; BioLine Innovations Jerusalem Limited Partnership, or BIJ L.P.; and BioLineRx USA, Inc., or BioLineRx USA.
|
This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus that we consider important. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in our ordinary shares. You should read this summary together with the entire prospectus, including the risks related to our most advanced therapeutic candidates, BL-1020, BL-1040, BL-5010, BL-1021 and BL-7040, our business, our industry, investing in our ordinary shares and our location in Israel, that we describe under “Risk Factors” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included at the end of this prospectus before making an investment in our ordinary shares.
Our Business
We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical development company dedicated to identifying, in-licensing and developing therapeutic candidates that have advantages over currently available therapies or that address unmet medical needs. Our current development pipeline consists of five clinical-stage therapeutic candidates: BL-1020, an orally available drug that we believe may be the first antipsychotic therapeutic to improve cognitive function in schizophrenia patients; BL-1021, a new chemical entity in development for the treatment of neuropathic pain, or pain that results from damage to nerve fibers; BL-1040, a novel polymer solution for use in the prevention of cardiac remodeling following an acute myocardial infarction, or AMI; BL-5010, a novel formulation for the non-surgical removal of skin lesions; and BL-7040, an oligonucleotide for the treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). In addition, we have 13 therapeutic candidates in the preclinical stages of development. We generate our pipeline by systematically identifying, rigorously validating and in-licensing therapeutic candidates that we believe exhibit a relatively high probability of therapeutic and commercial success. None of our therapeutic candidates has been approved for marketing and, to date, there have been no commercial sales of any of our therapeutic candidates. Our strategy includes commercializing our therapeutic candidates through out-licensing arrangements with biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies and evaluating, on a case by case basis, the commercialization of our therapeutic candidates independently.
Our Product Pipeline
The table below summarizes our current pipeline of therapeutic candidates, as well as the target indication and status of each candidate.
|
|
BL-1020
Our first lead therapeutic candidate, BL-1020, is in development for schizophrenia, a chronic, severe and disabling brain disorder that affects approximately 1% of the U.S. adult population as reported by the National Institute of Mental Health. Schizophrenia patients are typically treated with one of several commercially available antipsychotics, all of which are associated with side effects that reduce patient compliance and do not address the deterioration of cognitive function that affects the daily lives of schizophrenia patients. Despite these drawbacks, the three most commonly used antipsychotics, Risperdal, Zyprexa and Seroquel, reached aggregate sales of approximately $7.1 billion in the United States in 2009, based on the annual reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, by each of Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly and Company and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, the companies that market those drugs.
BL-1020 is an orally available drug that effectively reduces psychotic symptoms in a way which we believe may also improve cognition. BL-1020 targets the imbalance of two key neurotransmitters implicated in schizophrenia, dopamine and gamma aminobutyric acid, or GABA. We believe that the reduction in psychotic symptoms is attributable to BL-1020’s dopamine antagonism while the improvement in cognition may result from BL-1020’s GABAergic activity.
In our 363-patient phase 2b EAGLE (Effective Anti-psychosis via GABA Level Enhancement) study which was completed in July 2009, BL-1020 matched the antipsychotic efficacy of Risperdal, one of the leading approved antipsychotics, without evidence of the metabolic side effects associated with the use of atypical antipsychotics. Most significantly, BL-1020 demonstrated a clinically relevant and statistically significant improvement in cognition. Currently, there is no commercially available antipsychotic that improves cognitive function and this remains an important unmet medical need in the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychiatric and neurological diseases. In June 2011, we commenced the CLARITY clinical trial with respect to BL-1020. The CLARITY trial is designed to be a randomized, double-blind trial to examine both acute (6 weeks) and long-term (24 weeks) antipsychotic and cognitive efficacy, safety and tolerability of BL-1020 on patients with acute schizophrenia. In May 2011, we received approval to commence the CLARITY trial at 14 trial sites in Romania. The initiation of the trial in Romania took place in May 2011 and the first patient was treated in June 2011. In November 2011 we received approval from the Indian regulatory authorities and the Indian local ethics committees to commence the trial at 18 additional clinical sites in India. We started recruitment in November 2011 and the first patient was treated in December 2011.
In June 2010, we entered into an exclusive, royalty-bearing out-licensing arrangement with Cypress Bioscience with regard to BL-1020, covering the United States, Canada and Mexico, which became effective in August 2010. We received an upfront fee of $30.0 million from Cypress Bioscience upon the effectiveness of the agreement. We are obligated to pay to Bar Ilan Research and Development and Ramot at Tel Aviv University (Ramot), collectively, a royalty payment equal to 22.5% of the net consideration we receive from the out-licensing of BL-1020. We paid Bar Ilan Research and Development and Ramot $6.75 million, in the aggregate, from the $30.0 million upfront fee. We also paid the OCS $3.0 million as partial repayment of grants previously received for the BL-1020 development program.
In January 2011, Royalty Pharma acquired Cypress Bioscience. After the acquisition, we had a number of discussions with Cypress Bioscience and Royalty Pharma and they indicated to us that as a result of a change in their strategy, they believed it was in the best interest of BL-1020’s future commercial potential to consolidate the worldwide rights with our company. Cypress Bioscience expressed its desire that development of BL-1020 continue in a manner that both optimized Cypress Bioscience’s investment in BL-1020 and provided the best long-term commercialization potential. We believe that reacquiring BL-1020 was the best alternative at that time to ensure the timely development of BL-1020 and represents a significant opportunity for our company. Accordingly, on May 10, 2011, we entered into a rights reacquisition agreement with Cypress Bioscience. Under the terms and conditions of the rights reacquisition agreement, the out-license agreement terminated on May 31, 2011, and we reacquired all of the rights to develop and commercialize BL-1020 on that date. In consideration for the reacquisition of the rights, we agreed to pay Cypress Bioscience a royalty equal to 1% of the future net sales of BL-1020, if any, by us, our affiliates or our sublicensees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the aggregate royalty payment shall not exceed $80.0 million. In
addition, we agreed to pay Cypress Bioscience $10.0 million payable solely from amounts we receive, if any, pursuant to future agreements relating to the further development or commercialization of a product containing BL-1020, either alone or with other therapeutically active ingredients. In connection with the payment, we are required to pay Cypress Bioscience 10% of all payments under any such agreement but in any event, not more than $10.0 million. If any such agreement requires that we incur the costs of certain proposed clinical trials of BL-1020, the payment schedule will be subject to certain deferrals. We have no other outstanding material obligations to Cypress Bioscience under the original out-license agreement, other than standard indemnification obligations. We intend to continue to consider potential out-licensing opportunities for BL-1020, as well as the potential to develop and commercialize BL-1020 internally.
|
|
BL-1040
Our second lead therapeutic candidate, BL-1040, is a novel resorbable polymer solution for use in the prevention of cardiac remodeling in patients who suffered an AMI. Preventing cardiac remodeling following an AMI may prevent transition to congestive heart failure and/or improve patient survival over the long term. Following an AMI, BL-1040 is administered via intracoronary injection. Upon contact with damaged cardiac tissue, the liquid BL-1040 transitions into a gel within the infarcted cardiac tissue and forms a “scaffold” that supports, retains the shape of, and enhances the mechanical strength of the heart muscle during the recovery and repair phases following an AMI. The data from our preclinical studies indicate that, by supporting the damaged heart tissue, BL-1040 preserves the normal functioning of the heart and the data from our clinical trial indicate that BL-1040 should be safe. After consultation by our sublicensee Ikaria (see below) with the FDA and other comparable regulatory agencies, BL-1040 is being developed as a class III medical device under the FDA’s pre-marketing approval, or PMA, regulatory pathway.
In July 2009, we entered into an exclusive, worldwide out-licensing arrangement with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ikaria, Inc., or Ikaria, with regard to BL-1040. Under the arrangement, Ikaria is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to complete clinical development of, and to commercialize, BL-1040 or a product related thereto. To date, we have received $17.0 million from Ikaria and we are entitled to receive up to an additional $265.5 million from Ikaria upon achievement of certain development, regulatory, and commercial milestones. In addition, we are entitled to receive from Ikaria royalties from net sales of any product developed under the arrangement. We are obligated to pay 28% of all net consideration received under this arrangement to B.G. Negev Technologies, the party from which we in-licensed BL-1020 in 2004. We have agreed to pay Ramot a portion of the payments we make to B.G. Negev Technologies in connection with the in-license arrangement to satisfy contractual obligations between B.G. Negev Technologies and Ramot with respect to certain intellectual property rights to the licensed technology. We have also agreed to indemnify Ramot and certain of its related parties in connection with our use of the technology we in-licensed from B.G. Negev Technologies.
In December 2011 Ikaria commenced PRESERVATION 1, a CE Mark registration clinical trial of BL-1040 (now called “Bioabsorbable Cardiac Matrix,” or BCM by Ikaria). PRESERVATION 1 aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of BL-1040 (BCM) for prevention of ventricular remodeling and congestive heart failure when administered following AMI. The trial is a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multi-country and multi-center trial including approximately 300 patients which are expected to be recruited across 45 sites. This includes approximately 50 Australian patients at 11 clinical trial sites. The BCM device will be administered to subjects who had successful percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and they will then be monitored for six months.
|
|
BL-5010
Our third clinical-stage therapeutic candidate, BL 5010, is a novel formulation composed of two acids being developed for the removal of skin lesions in a nonsurgical manner. These two acids have already been approved for use in cosmetics. If approved, BL-5010 would be a convenient alternative to invasive, painful and expensive removal treatments for skin lesions and may allow for histological examination. Because treatment with BL-5010 is non-invasive, we believe BL-5010 poses minimal infection risk, and requires no anesthesia or bandaging. BL-5010 recently received European confirmation from the British Standards Institution Notified Body (BSI) in the UK, of the regulatory pathway classification as a Class IIa medical device. We are currently evaluating the most advantageous ways to progress with this therapeutic candidate from a clinical and business perspective.
In June 2009, we announced the initiation of a phase 1/2 clinical trial in 60 patients with seborrheic keratosis in Germany and the Netherlands to assess the safety and efficacy of BL-5010. The study was also designed to assess the feasibility of preserving the cellular structure of skin lesions for subsequent histological exams. The study was completed in September 2010, and positive results were announced in December 2010. The results of the trial show that for 96.7% of patients, the treated lesion fell off within 30 days of a single application of BL-5010. The results also showed that BL-5010 has a good safety profile, as no persistent irreversible adverse effects were observed at the treated site.
BL-1021
Our fourth clinical-stage therapeutic candidate, BL-1021, is a new chemical entity in development for the treatment of neuropathic pain, or pain that results from damage to nerve fibers. Multiple preclinical
in vitro
and
in vivo
studies have shown the safety and efficacy of BL-1021. BL-1021 showed significant reduction in symptoms of neuropathic pain with an enhanced safety profile.
In December 2011, we completed a phase 1a clinical trial to assess safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single administration of BL-1021 at doses between 10mg and 80mg in healthy volunteers. This clinical trial was a single-site, double-blind, placebo controlled study, carried out at the Hadassah Clinical Research Center in Jerusalem, Israel. Study results demonstrated that a single administration of BL-1021 in the dose range examined was safe and well tolerated, with no significant changes noted in vital signs, ECG or laboratory safety parameters at any dose when compared either to baseline measurements or to the placebo group. In addition, preliminary modeling of the pharmacokinetic data collected in this trial predicts that a once daily administration of BL-1021 at the dose levels assessed will enable reaching effective doses in patients.
BL-7040
Our fifth clinical-stage therapeutic candidate, BL-7040, is an orally available, synthetic oligonucleotide which we intend to develop for the treatment of IBD. This synthetic oligonucleotide consisting of a sequence of nucleic acids, the building blocks of genetic material such as DNA, has unique dual activity. Multiple preclinical
in vivo
studies have shown the safety and efficacy of BL-7040. Previous phase 1b and 2a clinical studies were completed with no major adverse events being reported. We intend to develop the compound for the treatment of IBD and other inflammatory diseases. We plan to enter a phase 2 study of BL-7040 to evaluate the effectiveness of BL-7040 for the treatment of IBD during 2012.
|
|
Our Product Development Approach
As part of our business strategy, we continuously source, evaluate and in-license therapeutic candidates. We establish and maintain close relationships with research institutes, academic institutions and biotechnology companies in Israel and, more recently, in other countries to identify and in-license therapeutic candidates. Before in-licensing, each therapeutic candidate must pass through our thorough screening process. We evaluate each compound’s potential for success by looking at the candidate’s efficacy, safety profile, total estimated development costs, technological novelty, patent status, market need and approvability, among other information. Our Scientific Advisory Board and disease-specific third-party advisors are active in evaluating each therapeutic candidate. Our approach is consistent with our objective of proceeding only with therapeutic candidates that we believe exhibit a relatively high probability of therapeutic and commercial success. To date, we estimate we have evaluated over 1,500 compounds, and we have presented more than 60 candidates to our Scientific Advisory Board for consideration, initiated development of 41 therapeutic candidates and terminated 23 feasibility programs.
When possible, we make use of third-party funding to develop early-stage therapeutic candidates. In January 2005, we entered into an agreement with the OCS to operate a biotechnology incubator. We develop certain of our in-licensed candidates with financial assistance from the OCS and have received approximately $12.9 million as of June 30, 2010 in the form of loans that are forgiven unless a project reaches commercialization. We have also received $5.8 million in grants from the OCS outside of the incubator agreement as of September 30, 2011. We are not required to repay grants for terminated projects. Of our 18 current development projects, seven have been funded through the OCS: BL-1020, BL-1021, BL-1040, BL-5040, BL-6010, BL-6030 and BL-7020. Other than BL-1020, all of these projects were also funded through our incubator. In addition, in January 2007 we entered into an agreement with one of our existing shareholders, Pan Atlantic Bank and Trust Limited, or Pan Atlantic, pursuant to which Pan Atlantic committed to provide us with grants of up to $5.0 million to be used in connection with the in-licensing and development of early development stage therapeutic candidates.
Our Strategy
Our objective is to be a leader in developing and commercializing innovative pharmaceutical, medical device and biopharmaceutical products.
The key elements of our strategy include the following:
●
facilitate the successful development and commercialization of BL-1040 by Ikaria.
●
commercialize additional therapeutic candidates through out-licensing arrangements or, where appropriate, by ourselves.
●
design development programs that reach critical decisions quickly.
●
use our expertise and proprietary screening methodology to evaluate in-licensing opportunities.
●
leverage and expand our relationships with research institutes, academic institutions and biotechnology companies, including the specific strategic relationships that we have developed with Israeli research and academic institutions, to identify and in-license promising therapeutic candidates.
|
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table is a summary of our historical consolidated financial data, which is derived from our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS. The summary consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
You should read this summary financial data in conjunction with, and it is qualified in its entirety by, reference to our historical financial information and other information provided in this prospectus, including “Selected Consolidated Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical results set forth below are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in future periods. We derived the selected consolidated financial data as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. In the opinion of our management, our unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the periods indicated therein. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full fiscal years encompassing those periods.
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated Statements Of Operations Data:
(1)
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2010
|
2011
|
2011
(2)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
U.S.$
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
– | – | – | 63,909 | 113,160 | 113,160 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cost of revenues
|
– | – | – | (22,622 | ) | (25,571 | ) | (25,571 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Research and development, expenses
net
|
(42,193 | ) | (75,863 | ) | (106,156 | ) | (90,302 | ) | (54,966 | ) | (43,769 | ) | (30,044 | ) | (8,094 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
– | – | – | (3,085 | ) | (4,609 | ) | (3,506 | ) | (2,431 | ) | (655 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
(6,357 | ) | (13,611 | ) | (13,083 | ) | (11,182 | ) | (14,875 | ) | (8,914 | ) | (9,546 | ) | (2,572 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Gain on adjusting warrants to fair value
|
– | 27,557 | 3,658 | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Capital loss, net
|
(121 | ) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
(48,671 | ) | (61,917 | ) | (115,581 | ) | (63,282 | ) | 13,139 | 31,400 | (42,021 | ) | (11,321 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Financial income
|
584 | 7,875 | 13,001 | 3,928 | 3,056 | 3,056 | 10,785 | 2,906 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Financial expenses
|
(834 | ) | (5,377 | ) | (12,269 | ) | (2,164 | ) | (8,755 | ) | (4,931 | ) | (4,750 | ) | (1,279 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Net profit (loss)
|
(48,921 | ) | (59,419 | ) | (114,849 | ) | (61,518 | ) | 7,440 | 29,525 | (35,986 | ) | (9,694 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Net profit (loss) per ordinary share
(3)
|
(1,425.67
|
) | (0.88 | ) | (1.44 | ) | (0.63 | ) | 0.06 | 0.24 | (0.29 | ) | (0.08 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Number of ordinary shares used in computing profit (loss) per ordinary share
|
38,521 | 69,302,075 | 78,131,103 | 123,497,029 | 123,512,098 | 123,519,170 | 123,601,141 | 123,601,141 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As of September 30,
|
||||||||
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
2011
|
2011
(2)
|
||||||
|
(in thousands NIS)
|
(in thousands U.S.$)
|
|||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
33,895 | 9,131 | ||||||
| Short-term bank deposits | 78,564 | 21,165 | ||||||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
4,076 | 1,098 | ||||||
|
Total assets
|
123,739 | 33,334 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
25,020 | 6,739 | ||||||
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
98,719 | 26,595 | ||||||
(1) Data on diluted loss per share were not presented in the financial statements because the effect of the exercise of the options and warrants is either immaterial or is anti-dilutive.
(2) Calculated using the exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel for September 30, 2011 at the rate of one U.S. dollar per NIS 3.712.
(3) The net loss per share has been adjusted to reflect the benefit component related to the issuance of rights to investors in 2009.
RISK
FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks we describe below, in addition to the other information set forth elsewhere in this prospectus, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes beginning on page F-1, before deciding to invest in our ordinary shares. These material risks could adversely impact our results of operations, possibly causing the trading price of our ordinary shares to decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Financial Condition and Capital Requirements
We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical development company with a history of operating losses, expect to incur additional losses in the future and may never be profitable.
We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical development company that was incorporated in 2003. Since our incorporation, we have been focused on research and development. Our most advanced therapeutic candidates are in clinical development. We, or our licensees, as applicable, will be required to conduct significant additional clinical trials before we can seek the regulatory approvals necessary to begin commercial sales of our therapeutic candidates. We have incurred losses since inception, principally as a result of research and development and general administrative expenses in support of our operations. We recorded a net loss of approximately NIS 36.0 million in the first nine months of 2011, a net profit of approximately NIS 7.4 million in 2010, and a net loss of approximately NIS 61.5 million in 2009. As of September 30, 2011, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately NIS 353.9 million. We anticipate that we will incur significant additional losses as we continue to focus our resources on prioritizing, selecting and advancing our most promising therapeutic candidates. We may never be profitable and we may never achieve significant sustained revenues.
We cannot ensure investors that our existing cash and investment balances will be sufficient to meet our future capital requirements.
We believe that after the private placement which closed on February 22, 2012, our existing cash and investment balances and other sources of liquidity, not including potential milestone payments under our out-licensing agreement with Ikaria, will be sufficient to meet our requirements through the second quarter of 2014. We have funded our operations primarily through public (in Israel) and private offerings of our securities and grants from the Office of the Chief Scientist of Israel’s Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor, or the OCS. We expect to fund our future operations through out-licensing arrangements with respect to our therapeutic candidates. We have entered into an out-licensing arrangement with Ikaria in connection with our BL-1040 therapeutic candidate. Although we had out-licensed to Cypress Bioscience, Inc., or Cypress Bioscience, certain development and commercial rights with respect to our BL-1020 therapeutic candidate, we reacquired the rights from Cypress Bioscience in May 2011. The adequacy of our available funds to meet our operating and capital requirements will depend on many factors including: the number, breadth, progress and results of our research, product development and clinical programs; the costs and timing of obtaining regulatory approvals for any of our therapeutic candidates; the terms and conditions of in-licensing and out-licensing therapeutic candidates; and costs incurred in enforcing and defending our patent claims and other intellectual property rights.
While we will continue to explore alternative financing sources, including the possibility of future securities offerings and continued government funding, we cannot be certain that in the future these liquidity sources will be available when needed on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or that our actual cash requirements will not be greater than anticipated. We may seek to finance our operations through other sources, including out-licensing arrangements for the development and commercialization of our therapeutic candidates or other partnerships or joint ventures. If we are unable to obtain future financing through the methods we describe above or through other means, we may be unable to complete our business objectives and may be unable to continue operations, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects.
We have a limited operating history and our operations to date have been limited to organizing and staffing our company, conducting product development activities for our therapeutic candidates and performing research and development with respect to our preclinical programs. We have not yet demonstrated an ability to obtain regulatory approval for or to commercialize a therapeutic candidate. Consequently, any predictions about our future performance may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a history of successfully developing and commercializing pharmaceutical products or medical devices.
Risks Related to Our Business and Regulatory Matters
If we or our licensees are unable to obtain U.S. and/or foreign regulatory approval for our therapeutic candidates, we will be unable to commercialize our therapeutic candidates.
To date, we have not marketed, distributed or sold an approved product. Currently, we have five clinical-stage therapeutic candidates in clinical development: BL-1020 for the treatment of schizophrenia; BL-1021 for the treatment of neuropathic pain; BL-1040 for the prevention of ventricular remodeling and congestive heart failure following acute myocardial infarctions, or AMI; BL-5010 for the treatment of skin lesions; and BL-7040 for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, or IBD. Our therapeutic candidates are subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to development, clinical trials, manufacturing and commercialization of drugs and devices. We may not obtain marketing approval for any of our therapeutic candidates in a timely manner or at all. In connection with the clinical trials for BL-1020, BL-1021, BL-1040, BL-5010 and BL-7040, and other therapeutic candidates that we are currently developing or may seek to develop in the future, either on our own or through out-licensing arrangements, we face the risk that:
|
|
•
|
a therapeutic candidate or medical device may not prove safe or efficacious;
|
|
|
•
|
the results with respect to any therapeutic candidate may not confirm the positive results from earlier preclinical studies or clinical trials;
|
|
|
•
|
the results may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, or other regulatory authorities; and
|
|
|
•
|
the results will justify only limited and/or restrictive uses, including the inclusion of warnings and contraindications, which could significantly limit the marketability and profitability of the therapeutic candidate.
|
Any delay in obtaining, or the failure to obtain, required regulatory approvals will materially and adversely affect our ability to generate future revenues from a particular therapeutic candidate. Any regulatory approval to market a product may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which we may market the product or may impose restrictive conditions of use, including cautionary information, thereby limiting the size of the market for the product. We and our licensees, as applicable, also are, and will be, subject to numerous foreign regulatory requirements that govern the conduct of clinical trials, manufacturing and marketing authorization, pricing and third-party reimbursement. The foreign regulatory approval process includes all of the risks associated with the FDA approval process that we describe above, as well as risks attributable to the satisfaction of foreign requirements. Approval by the FDA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities outside the United States. Foreign jurisdictions may have different approval processes than those required by the FDA and may impose additional testing requirements for our therapeutic candidates.
We have no experience selling, marketing or distributing products and no internal capability to do so.
We currently have no sales, marketing or distribution capabilities and no experience in building a sales force or distribution capabilities. To be able to commercialize any of our therapeutic candidates upon approval, if at all, we must either develop internal sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, which will be expensive and time consuming, or enter into out-licensing arrangements with third parties to perform these services. In July 2009, we entered into an exclusive, royalty-bearing worldwide out-licensing arrangement with Ikaria with respect to BL-1040, which was amended and restated in August 2009. Under the arrangement, Ikaria is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to complete clinical development of, and to commercialize, BL-1040 or a product related thereto. In May 2011, we reacquired from Cypress Bioscience all out-licensed development and commercialization rights to BL-1020. Unless we enter into an out-licensing arrangement with a new partner with respect to BL-1020, we may elect to develop and commercialize BL-1020 internally.
If we decide to market any of our other therapeutic candidates on our own, we must commit significant financial and managerial resources to develop a marketing and sales force with technical expertise and with supporting distribution capabilities. Factors that may inhibit our efforts to commercialize our products directly and without strategic partners include:
|
|
•
|
our inability to recruit and retain adequate numbers of effective sales and marketing personnel;
|
|
|
•
|
the inability of sales personnel to obtain access to or persuade adequate numbers of physicians to prescribe our therapeutic candidates;
|
|
|
•
|
the lack of complementary products to be offered by sales personnel, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage relative to companies with more extensive product lines; and
|
|
|
•
|
unforeseen costs and expenses associated with creating and sustaining an independent sales and marketing organization.
|
We may not be successful in recruiting the sales and marketing personnel necessary to sell any of our therapeutic candidates upon approval, if at all, and even if we do build a sales force, it may not be successful in marketing our therapeutic candidates, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We depend on out-licensing arrangements to develop, market and commercialize our therapeutic candidates.
We depend on out-licensing arrangements to develop, market and commercialize our therapeutic candidates. We have limited experience in developing, marketing and commercializing therapeutic candidates. Dependence on out-licensing arrangements will subject us to a number of risks, including the risk that:
|
|
•
|
we may not be able to control the amount and timing of resources that our licensees devote to our therapeutic candidates;
|
|
|
•
|
our licensees may experience financial difficulties;
|
|
|
•
|
our licensees may fail to secure adequate commercial supplies of our therapeutic candidates upon marketing approval, if at all;
|
|
|
•
|
our future revenues will depend heavily on the efforts of our licensees;
|
|
|
•
|
business combinations or significant changes in a licensee’s business strategy may adversely affect the licensee’s willingness or ability to complete its obligations under any arrangement with us;
|
|
|
•
|
a licensee could move forward with a competing therapeutic candidate developed either independently or in collaboration with others, including our competitors; and
|
|
|
•
|
out-licensing arrangements are often terminated or allowed to expire, which would delay the development and may increase the development costs of our therapeutic candidates.
|
If we or any of our licensees, including Ikaria, breach or terminate their agreements with us, or if any of our licensees otherwise fail to conduct their development and commercialization activities in a timely manner or there is a dispute about their obligations, we may need to seek other licensees, or we may have to develop our own internal sales and marketing capability for our therapeutic candidates. Our dependence on our licensees’ experience and the rights of our licensees will limit our flexibility in considering alternative out-licensing arrangements for our therapeutic candidates. Any failure to successfully develop these arrangements or failure by our licensees to successfully develop or commercialize any of our therapeutic candidates in a competitive and timely manner, will have a material adverse effect on the commercialization of our therapeutic candidates.
If we are unable to enter into agreements with third parties to develop, market and commercialize our therapeutic candidates, we may not generate product revenue.
We plan to develop, market and commercialize our therapeutic candidates primarily through out-licensing arrangements or, when appropriate, by ourselves. The preclinical and clinical development of our therapeutic candidates, even if undertaken through licensing arrangements with third parties, will require that we expend significant funds and will be subject to the risks of failure inherent in the development of pharmaceutical products. In order to successfully commercialize any of our therapeutic candidates that may be approved in the future by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, we must enter into out-licensing arrangements with third parties to perform these services for us or build internal sales and marketing capabilities. Our ability to commercialize our therapeutic candidates will depend on our ability to:
|
|
•
|
attract suitable licensees on reasonable terms;
|
|
|
•
|
obtain and maintain necessary intellectual property rights to our therapeutic candidates;
|
|
|
•
|
where appropriate, enter into arrangements with third parties to manufacture our products, if any, on our behalf; and
|
|
|
•
|
deploy sales and marketing resources effectively or enter into arrangements with third parties to provide these services.
|
If we are unable to enter into an out-licensing arrangement with respect to BL-1020, BL-1021, BL-5010, BL-7040 or any of our other therapeutic candidates, whether with third parties or independently, our ability to develop a commercially viable product or generate product revenue based on the therapeutic candidate will be adversely affected, and we may not become profitable. We face significant competition in seeking out-licensing arrangements with third parties. We may not be able to negotiate out-licensing arrangements on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, these out-licensing arrangements may be unsuccessful. If we fail to negotiate and maintain suitable out-licensing arrangements, we may have to limit the size or scope of, or delay, one or more of our development or research programs. If we elect to fund development or research programs independently, we will have to increase our expenditures significantly and will need to obtain additional funding, which may be unavailable or available only on unfavorable terms. We will also need to make significant investments in pharmaceutical product development, marketing, sales and regulatory compliance resources, and we will have to establish or contract for the manufacture of products under applicable regulatory requirements. Any failure to enter into an out-licensing arrangement with respect to the development, marketing and commercialization of any therapeutic candidate, or failure to develop, market and commercialize the therapeutic candidate independently, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Modifications to our therapeutic candidates, or to any other therapeutic candidates that we may develop in the future, may require new regulatory clearances or approvals or may require us or our licensees, as applicable, to recall or cease marketing these therapeutic candidates until clearances are obtained.
Modifications to our therapeutic candidates, after they have been approved for marketing, if at all, or to any other pharmaceutical product or medical device that we may develop in the future, may require new regulatory clearance, or approvals, and, if necessitated by a problem with a marketed product, may result in the recall or suspension of marketing of the previously approved and marketed product until clearances or approvals of the modified product are obtained. The FDA requires pharmaceutical products and device manufacturers to initially make and document a determination of whether or not a modification requires a new approval, supplement or clearance. A manufacturer may determine in conformity with applicable regulations and guidelines that a modification may be implemented without pre-clearance by the FDA; however, the FDA can review a manufacturer’s decision and may disagree. The FDA may also on its own initiative determine that a new clearance or approval is required. If the FDA requires new clearances or approvals of any pharmaceutical product or medical device for which we or our licensees receive marketing approval, if any, we or our licensees may be required to recall such product and to stop marketing the product as modified, which could require us or our licensees to redesign the product and will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In these circumstances, we may be subject to significant enforcement actions.
If a manufacturer determines that a modification to an FDA-cleared device could significantly affect the safety or efficacy of the device, would constitute a major change in its intended use, or otherwise requires pre-clearance, the modification may not be implemented without the requisite clearance. We or our licensees may not be able to obtain those additional clearances or approvals for the modifications or additional indications in a timely manner, or at all. For those products sold in the European Union, or E.U., we, or our licensees, as applicable, must notify the applicable E.U. Notified Body, an organization appointed by a member State of the E.U. either for the approval and monitoring of a manufacturer’s quality assurance system or for direct product inspection, if significant changes are made to the product or if there are substantial changes to the quality assurance systems affecting the product. Delays in obtaining required future clearances or approvals would materially and adversely affect our ability to introduce new or enhanced products in a timely manner, which in turn would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Clinical trials involve a lengthy and expensive process with an uncertain outcome, and results of earlier studies and trials may not be predictive of future trial results.
We have limited experience in conducting and managing the clinical trials necessary to obtain regulatory approvals, including FDA approval. Clinical trials are expensive and complex, can take many years and have uncertain outcomes. We cannot predict whether we or our licensees will encounter problems with any of the completed, ongoing or planned clinical trials that will cause us, our licensees or regulatory authorities to delay or suspend clinical trials, or delay the analysis of data from completed or ongoing clinical trials. We estimate that clinical trials of our most advanced therapeutic candidates will continue for several years, but they may take significantly longer to complete. Failure can occur at any stage of the testing and we may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, the clinical trial process that could delay or prevent commercialization of our current or future therapeutic candidates, including but not limited to:
|
|
•
|
delays in securing clinical investigators or trial sites for the clinical trials;
|
|
|
•
|
delays in obtaining institutional review board and other regulatory approvals to commence a clinical trial;
|
|
|
•
|
slower than anticipated patient recruitment and enrollment;
|
|
|
•
|
negative or inconclusive results from clinical trials;
|
|
|
•
|
unforeseen safety issues;
|
|
|
•
|
uncertain dosing issues;
|
|
|
•
|
an inability to monitor patients adequately during or after treatment; and
|
|
|
•
|
problems with investigator or patient compliance with the trial protocols.
|
A number of companies in the pharmaceutical, medical device and biotechnology industries, including those with greater resources and experience than us, have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after seeing promising results in earlier clinical trials. Despite the results reported in earlier clinical trials for our therapeutic candidates, we do not know whether any phase 3 or other clinical trials we or our licensees may conduct will demonstrate adequate efficacy and safety to result in regulatory approval to market our therapeutic candidates. If later-stage clinical trials of any therapeutic candidate do not produce favorable results, our ability to obtain regulatory approval for the therapeutic candidate may be adversely impacted, which will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on third parties to conduct our clinical trials and provide other services, and those third parties may not perform satisfactorily, including by failing to meet established deadlines for the completion of such services.
We do not have the ability to conduct certain preclinical studies and clinical trials independently for our therapeutic candidates, and we rely on third parties, such as contract laboratories, contract research organizations, medical institutions and clinical investigators to conduct these studies and our clinical trials. Our reliance on these third parties limits our control over these activities. The third-party contractors may not assign as great a priority to our clinical development programs or pursue them as diligently as we would if we were undertaking such programs directly. Accordingly, these third-party contractors may not complete activities on schedule, or may not conduct the studies or our clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or with our trial design. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, or if their performance is substandard, we may be required to replace them. Although we believe that there are a number of other third-party contractors that we could engage to continue these activities, replacement of these third parties will result in delays. As a result, our efforts to obtain regulatory approvals for, and to commercialize, our therapeutic candidates may be delayed. The third-party contractors may also have relationships with other commercial entities, some of whom may compete with us. If the third-party contractors assist our competitors, our competitive position may be harmed.
In addition, our ability to bring future products to market depends on the quality and integrity of data that we present to regulatory authorities in order to obtain marketing authorizations. Although we attempt to audit and control the quality of third-party data, we cannot guarantee the authenticity or accuracy of such data, nor can we be certain that such data has not been fraudulently generated. The failure of these third parties to carry out their obligations would materially adversely affect our ability to develop and market new products and implement our strategies.
If our competitors develop and market products that are more effective, safer or less expensive than our current or future therapeutic candidates, our future prospects will be negatively impacted.
The life sciences industry is highly competitive, and we face significant competition from many pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that are researching and marketing products designed to address the indications for which we are currently developing therapeutic candidates or for which we may develop therapeutic candidates in the future. Specifically, we are aware of several other companies who currently market and/or are in the process of developing products that address schizophrenia, AMI, skin lesions, neuropathic pain and IBD. There are a number of treatments currently marketed for schizophrenia patients, including atypical anti-psychotics from Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly and Company, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc. and others. In addition, there are a number of generic brands of typical and atypical anti-psychotics available for commercial use. We are also aware of a number of potentially competitive compounds under development to treat schizophrenia including: Cariprazine, which is being developed by Forest Laboratories, Inc. and Gedeon Richter; Bifeprunox, which is being developed by Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lurasidone, which is being developed by Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd.; LY2140023, which is being developed by Eli Lilly; LU3130, which is being developed by Lundbeck; RG1678, which is being developed by Roche and Chugai; and Vyvanse, which is being developed by Shire. There are a number of therapies currently in development that aim at preventing cardiac remodeling and subsequent congestive heart failure (CHF), including BioHeart, Inc.’s MyoCell® implantation procedure, Paracor Medical, Inc.’s HeartNet
TM
and Acorn Cardiovascular, Inc.’s CorCap
TM
device. Skin lesions are generally removed using cryotherapy (liquid nitrogen), laser therapy, photodynamic therapy, electrodessication and curretage and several cream-based treatments. Picato (Leo Pharma) and Metvix® Galderma Pharma SA are cream-based treatments for skin lesions which have been approved in many countries. The neuropathic pain market leaders are anticonvulsants, such as Lyrica (Pregabalin, Pfizer) and the generic Gabapentin, together with off-label brands. Additional market leaders are Cymbalta (duloxetine; Eli Lilly/Shionogi), Lidoderm (5% lidocaine patch; Endo/Grünenthal), Qutenza (8% capsaicin patch; NeurogesX/Astellas) and Gralise (extended-release Gabapentin; Depomed). We are also aware of a number of potentially competitive compounds under development, including Nucynta ER (Tapentadol ER; Grünenthal/Johnson & Johnson), DM-1796 (Gabapentin GR; Depomed/Abbott), Horizant (Gabapentin enacarbil; XenoPort/GlaxoSmithKline), Eladur (bupivacaine patch; Durect/King/Pfizer), AmiKet (amitriptyline and ketamine; EpiCept), AVP-923 (dextromethorphan hydrobromide/quinidine sulfate; IriSys/Avanir) and Ralfinamide (Newron). IBD is often treated with currently marketed steroids, immunomodulators and anti-TNFs (tumor necrosis factors). Approved treatments for IBD currently include anti-TNFs, such as Remicade (infliximab, Janssen Biotech, Inc., a Johnson & Johnson company, Merck & Co. and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma) and Humira (adalimumab, Abbott Laboratories and Eisai Co.), in addition to generic brands of mesalazine, a 5-aminosalicylate. Additional market leaders are Cimzia (certolizumab, UCB, Inc.), an anti-TNF, and Tysabri (natalizumab, Biogen Inc.), an integrin inhibitor. We are also aware of a number of potentially competitive compounds under development, including Simponi (golimumab, Janssen Biotech, Inc., Merck & Co. and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma), a TNF inhibitor, and Budesonide MMX (Cosmo Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Santarus, Inc.).
Any therapeutic candidates we may develop in the future are also likely to face competition from other drugs and therapies.
Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial, manufacturing, marketing and drug development resources than we do. Large pharmaceutical companies, in particular, have extensive experience in clinical testing and in obtaining regulatory approvals for drugs. These companies also have significantly greater research and marketing capabilities than we do. If our competitors market products that are more effective, safer or less expensive than our future therapeutic candidates, if any, or that reach the market sooner than our future therapeutic candidates, if any, we may not achieve commercial success.
We expect to rely upon third-party manufacturers to produce therapeutic supplies for phase 3 clinical trials, and commercialization, of our therapeutic candidates. If we manufacture any of our therapeutic candidates in the future, we will be required to incur significant costs and devote significant efforts to establish and maintain manufacturing capabilities.
We currently have laboratories that are compliant with both current good manufacturing practices, or cGMP, and Good Laboratory Practices, or GLP, and allow us to manufacture therapeutic supplies for our current clinical trials. If we decide to perform any phase 3 clinical trial, or commercialize, any therapeutic candidate on our own, we anticipate that we will rely on third parties to produce the therapeutic supplies. We have limited personnel with experience in drug or medical device manufacturing and we lack the resources and capabilities to manufacture any of our therapeutic candidates on a commercial scale. The manufacture of pharmaceutical products and medical devices requires significant expertise and capital investment, including the development of advanced manufacturing techniques and process controls. Manufacturers of pharmaceutical products and medical devices often encounter difficulties in production, particularly in scaling up initial production. These problems include difficulties with production costs and yields and quality control, including stability of the therapeutic candidate.
We do not currently have any long-term agreements with third party manufacturers for the supply of any of our therapeutic candidates. We believe that our current supply of therapeutic candidates is sufficient to complete our current clinical trials. However, if we require additional supplies of our therapeutic candidates to complete our clinical trials or if we elect to commercialize our products independently, we may be unable to enter into agreements for clinical or commercial supply, as applicable, with third party manufacturers, or may be unable to do so on acceptable terms. Even if we enter into these agreements, it is likely that the manufacturers of each therapeutic candidate will be single source suppliers to us for a significant period of time.
Reliance on third party manufacturers entails risks to which we would not be subject if we manufactured therapeutic candidates ourselves, including:
|
|
•
|
reliance on the third party for regulatory compliance and quality assurance;
|
|
|
•
|
limitations on supply availability resulting from capacity and scheduling constraints of the third parties;
|
|
|
•
|
impact on our reputation in the marketplace if manufacturers of our products, once commercialized, fail to meet customer demands;
|
|
|
•
|
the possible breach of the manufacturing agreement by the third party because of factors beyond our control; and
|
|
|
•
|
the possible termination or nonrenewal of the agreement by the third party, based on its own business priorities, at a time that is costly or inconvenient for us.
|
The failure of any of our contract manufacturers to maintain high manufacturing standards could result in injury or death of clinical trial participants or patients being treated with our products. Such failure could also result in product liability claims, product recalls, product seizures or withdrawals, delays or failures in testing or delivery, cost overruns or other problems, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we are required to manufacture any of our therapeutic candidates in the future in connection with phase 3 clinical trials or for commercialization, we will be required to incur significant costs and devote significant efforts to establish and maintain manufacturing capabilities.
We and our contract manufacturers are, and will be, subject to FDA and other comparable agency regulations.
We and our contract manufacturers are, and will be, required to adhere to FDA regulations setting forth cGMP for drugs and Quality System Regulations, or QSR, for devices. These regulations cover all aspects of the manufacturing, testing, quality control and recordkeeping relating to our therapeutic candidates. We and our manufacturers may not be able to comply with applicable regulations. We and our manufacturers are and will be subject to unannounced inspections by the FDA, state regulators and similar regulators outside the United States. Our failure, or the failure of our third party manufacturers, to comply with applicable regulations could result in the imposition of sanctions on us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, failure of regulatory authorities to grant marketing approval of our therapeutic candidates, delays, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of our candidates or products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect regulatory approval and supplies of our therapeutic candidates, and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We depend on our ability to identify and in-license technologies and therapeutic candidates.
We employ a number of methods to efficiently and effectively identify therapeutic candidates that we believe are likely to achieve commercial success. In addition to our internal research and business developments efforts, we employ a rigorous screening system developed by us. In addition, our Scientific Advisory Board and disease-specific third-party advisors evaluate each therapeutic candidate. However, there can be no assurance that our internal research efforts or our screening system will accurately or consistently select among various therapeutic candidates those that have the highest likelihood to achieve, and which ultimately achieve, commercial success. As a result, we may spend substantial resources developing therapeutic candidates that will not achieve commercial success and we may not advance those therapeutic candidates with the greatest potential for commercial success.
An important element of our strategy is maintaining relationships with universities, medical institutions and biotechnology companies in order to in-license potential therapeutic candidates. We may not be able to maintain relationships with these entities and they may elect not to enter into in-licensing agreements with us or to terminate existing agreements. We may not be able to acquire licenses on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Failure to license or otherwise acquire necessary technologies could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we cannot meet requirements under our in-license agreements, we could lose the rights to our therapeutic candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We depend on in-licensing agreements with third parties to maintain the intellectual property rights to certain of our therapeutic candidates. We have in-licensed rights from Bar Ilan Research and Development Company Ltd., or Bar Ilan Research and Development, and Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd., or Ramot, with respect to our BL-1020 and BL-1021 therapeutic candidates, from B.G. Negev Technologies with respect to our BL-1040 therapeutic candidate, from Innovative Pharmaceutical Concepts, Inc., or IPC, with respect to our BL-5010 therapeutic candidate and from the Yissum Research Development Company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Ltd., or Yissum, with respect to our BL-7040 therapeutic candidate. See “Business — Our Product Pipeline.” Our in-license agreements require us to make payments and satisfy performance obligations in order to maintain our rights under these agreements. The royalty rates and revenue sharing payments vary from case to case but generally range from 20% to 29% of the consideration we receive from sublicensing the applicable therapeutic candidate. In some instances, we are required to pay a substantially lower percentage (generally less than 5%) if we elect to commercialize the subject therapeutic candidate independently. These in-license agreements last either throughout the life of the patents that are the subject of the agreements, or with respect to other licensed technology, for a number of years after the first commercial sale of the relevant product.
In addition, we are responsible for the cost of filing and prosecuting certain patent applications and maintaining certain issued patents licensed to us. If we do not meet our obligations under our in-license agreements in a timely manner, we could lose the rights to our proprietary technology which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Even if we obtain regulatory approvals, our therapeutic candidates will be subject to ongoing regulatory review and if we fail to comply with continuing U.S. and applicable foreign regulations, we could lose those approvals and our business would be seriously harmed.
Even if products we or our licensees develop receive regulatory approval or clearance, we or our licensees, as applicable, will be subject to ongoing reporting obligations and the products and the manufacturing operations will be subject to continuing regulatory review, including FDA inspections. The results of this ongoing review may result in the withdrawal of a product from the market, the interruption of the manufacturing operations and/or the imposition of labeling and/or marketing limitations. Since many more patients are exposed to drugs and medical devices following their marketing approval, serious but infrequent adverse reactions that were not observed in clinical trials may be observed during the commercial marketing of the product. In addition, the manufacturer and the manufacturing facilities we or our licensees, as applicable, will use to produce any therapeutic candidate will be subject to periodic review and inspection by the FDA and other, similar foreign regulators. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with any product, manufacturer or manufacturing process, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in actions such as:
|
|
•
|
restrictions on such product, manufacturer or manufacturing process;
|
|
|
•
|
warning letters from the FDA or other regulatory authorities;
|
|
|
•
|
withdrawal of the product from the market;
|
|
|
•
|
suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals;
|
|
|
•
|
refusal to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications that we or our licensees submit;
|
|
|
•
|
voluntary or mandatory recall;
|
|
|
•
|
fines;
|
|
|
•
|
refusal to permit the import or export of our products;
|
|
|
•
|
product seizure or detentions;
|
|
|
•
|
injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties; or
|
|
|
•
|
adverse publicity.
|
If we, or our licensees, suppliers, third party contractors, partners or clinical investigators are slow to adapt, or are unable to adapt, to changes in existing regulatory requirements or the adoption of new regulatory requirements or policies, we or our licensees may lose marketing approval for any of our products, if any of our therapeutic products are approved, resulting in decreased or lost revenue from milestones, product sales or royalties.
Our business could suffer if we are unable to attract and retain key employees.
Our success depends upon the continued service and performance of our senior management and other key personnel. The loss of the services of these personnel could delay or prevent the successful completion of our planned clinical trials or the commercialization of our therapeutic candidates or otherwise affect our ability to manage our company effectively and to carry out our business plan. We do not maintain key-man life insurance. Although we have entered into employment agreements with all of the members of our senior management team, members of our senior management team may resign at any time. High demand exists for senior management and other key personnel in the pharmaceutical industry. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to retain and attract such personnel.
Our growth and success also depend on our ability to attract and retain additional highly qualified scientific, technical, sales, managerial and finance personnel. We experience intense competition for qualified personnel, and the existence of non-competition agreements between prospective employees and their former employers may prevent us from hiring those individuals or subject us to suit from their former employers. In addition, if we elect to independently commercialize any therapeutic candidate, we will need to expand our marketing and sales capabilities. While we attempt to provide competitive compensation packages to attract and retain key personnel, many of our competitors are likely to have greater resources and more experience than we have, making it difficult for us to compete successfully for key personnel. If we cannot attract and retain sufficiently qualified technical employees on acceptable terms, we may not be able to develop and commercialize competitive products. Further, any failure to effectively integrate new personnel could prevent us from successfully growing our company.
Risks Related to Our Industry
Even if our therapeutic candidates receive regulatory approval or do not require regulatory approval, they may not become commercially viable products.
Even if our therapeutic candidates are approved for commercialization, they may not become commercially viable products. For example, if we or our licensees receive regulatory approval to market a product, approval may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses or subject to labeling or marketing restrictions which could materially and adversely affect the marketability and profitability of the product. In addition, a new product may appear promising at an early stage of development or after clinical trials but never reach the market, or it may reach the market but not result in sufficient product sales, if any. A therapeutic candidate may not result in commercial success for various reasons, including:
|
|
•
|
difficulty in large-scale manufacturing;
|
|
|
•
|
low market acceptance by physicians, healthcare payors, patients and the medical community as a result of lower demonstrated clinical safety or efficacy compared to other products, prevalence and severity of adverse side effects, or other potential disadvantages relative to alternative treatment methods;
|
|
|
•
|
insufficient or unfavorable levels of reimbursement from government or third-party payors;
|
|
|
•
|
infringement on proprietary rights of others for which we or our licensees have not received licenses;
|
|
|
•
|
incompatibility with other therapeutic products;
|
|
|
•
|
other potential advantages of alternative treatment methods;
|
|
|
•
|
ineffective marketing and distribution support;
|
|
|
•
|
lack of cost-effectiveness; or
|
|
|
•
|
timing of market introduction of competitive products.
|
If we are unable to develop commercially viable products, either on our own or through licensees, our business, results of operations and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected.
We could be adversely affected if healthcare reform measures substantially change the market for medical care or healthcare coverage in the United States.
The U.S. Congress recently adopted important legislation regarding health insurance. Under the new legislation, substantial changes are going to be made to the current system for paying for healthcare in the United States, including changes made in order to extend medical benefits to those who currently lack insurance coverage. Extending coverage to a large population could substantially change the structure of the health insurance system and the methodology for reimbursing medical services, drugs and devices. These structural changes could entail modifications to the existing system of private payors and government programs (Medicare, Medicaid and State Children’s Health Insurance Program), creation of a government-sponsored healthcare insurance source, or some combination of both, as well as other changes. Restructuring the coverage of medical care in the United States could impact the reimbursement for prescribed drugs and biopharmaceuticals, such as those we and our licensees are currently developing. If reimbursement for our approved products, if any, is substantially reduced in the future, or rebate obligations associated with them are substantially increased, our business could be materially and adversely impacted.
Extending medical benefits to those who currently lack coverage will likely result in substantial cost to the U.S. federal government, which may force significant changes to the healthcare system in the United States. Much of the funding for expanded healthcare coverage may be sought through cost savings. While some of these savings may come from realizing greater efficiencies in delivering care, improving the effectiveness of preventive care and enhancing the overall quality of care, much of the cost savings may come from reducing the cost of care. Cost of care could be reduced by decreasing the level of reimbursement for medical services or products (including those biopharmaceuticals currently being developed by us or our licensees), or by restricting coverage (and, thereby, utilization) of medical services or products. In either case, a reduction in the utilization of, or reimbursement for, any product for which we receive marketing approval in the future could have a materially adverse effect on our financial performance.
If third-party payors do not adequately reimburse customers for any of our therapeutic candidates that are approved for marketing, they might not be purchased or used, and our revenues and profits will not develop or increase.
Our revenues and profits will depend heavily upon the availability of adequate reimbursement for the use of our approved candidates, if any, from governmental or other third-party payors, both in the United States and in foreign markets. Reimbursement by a third-party payor may depend upon a number of factors, including the third-party payor’s determination that the use of an approved product is:
|
|
•
|
a covered benefit under its health plan;
|
|
|
•
|
safe, effective and medically necessary;
|
|
|
•
|
appropriate for the specific patient;
|
|
|
•
|
cost-effective; and
|
|
|
•
|
neither experimental nor investigational.
|
Obtaining reimbursement approval for a product from each government or other third-party payor is a time-consuming and costly process that could require us or our licensees to provide supporting scientific, clinical and cost-effectiveness data for the use of our products to each payor. Even when a payor determines that a product is eligible for reimbursement, the payor may impose coverage limitations that preclude payment for some uses that are approved by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Reimbursement rates may vary according to the use of the product and the clinical setting in which it used, may be based on payments allowed for lower-cost products that are already reimbursed, may be incorporated into existing payments for other products or services, and may reflect budgetary constraints and/or imperfections in Medicare, Medicaid or other data used to calculate these rates.
In the United States, there have been, and we expect that there will continue to be, federal and state proposals to constrain expenditures for medical products and services, which may affect payments for our products in the United States. We believe that legislation that reduces reimbursement for our therapeutic candidates could adversely impact how much or under what circumstances healthcare providers will prescribe or administer our products, if approved. This could materially and adversely impact our business by reducing our ability to generate revenue, raise capital, obtain additional collaborators and market our products, if approved.
Further, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, frequently change product descriptors, coverage policies, product and service codes, payment methodologies and reimbursement values. Third-party payors often follow Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement rates, and both CMS and other third-party payors may have sufficient market power to demand significant price reductions.
Our business has a substantial risk of clinical trial and product liability claims. If we are unable to obtain and maintain appropriate levels of insurance, a claim could adversely affect our business.
Our business exposes us to significant potential clinical trial and product liability risks that are inherent in the development, manufacturing and sales and marketing of human therapeutic products. Although we do not currently commercialize any products, claims could be made against us based on the use of our therapeutic candidates in clinical trials. We currently carry life science liability insurance covering bodily and personal injury, general liability and products liability with an annual coverage amount of $5.0 million in the aggregate, and clinical trial insurance with a coverage amount of $10.0 million in the aggregate. In addition to these policies, we carry excess liability insurance with a coverage amount of $5.0 million which increases the coverage limit provided by our life science insurance package. However, our insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. Furthermore, clinical trial and product liability insurance is becoming increasingly expensive. As a result, we may be unable to maintain current amounts of insurance coverage or obtain additional or sufficient insurance at a reasonable cost to protect against losses that could have a material adverse effect on us. If a claim is brought against us, we might be required to pay legal and other expenses to defend the claim, as well as damages awards beyond the coverage of our insurance policies resulting from a claim brought successfully against us. Furthermore, whether or not we are ultimately successful in defending any claims, we might be required to direct significant financial and managerial resources to such defense, and adverse publicity is likely to result.
We deal with hazardous materials and must comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, which can be expensive and restrict how we do business.
Our activities and those of our third-party manufacturers on our behalf involve the controlled storage, use and disposal of hazardous materials, including microbial agents, corrosive, explosive and flammable chemicals and other hazardous compounds. We and our manufacturers are subject to U.S. federal, state, local, Israeli and other foreign laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these hazardous materials. Although we believe that our safety procedures for handling and disposing of these materials comply with the standards prescribed by these laws and regulations, we cannot eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. In addition, if we develop a manufacturing capacity, we may incur substantial costs to comply with environmental regulations and would be subject to the risk of accidental contamination or injury from the use of hazardous materials in our manufacturing process.
In the event of an accident, government authorities may curtail our use of these materials and interrupt our business operations. In addition, we could be liable for any civil damages that result, which may exceed our financial resources and may seriously harm our business. Although our Israeli insurance program covers certain unforeseen sudden pollutions, we do not maintain a separate insurance policy for any of the foregoing types of risks. In addition, although the general liability section of our life sciences policy covers certain environmental issues, pollution in the United States and Canada is excluded from the policy. In the event of environmental discharge or contamination or an accident, we may be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. In addition, we may be subject to liability and may be required to comply with new or existing environmental laws regulating pharmaceuticals or other medical products in the environment.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
Our access to most of the intellectual property associated with our therapeutic candidates results from in-license agreements with universities, research institutions and biotechnology companies, the termination of which would prevent us from commercializing the associated therapeutic candidates.
We do not conduct our own initial research with respect to the identification of our therapeutic candidates. Instead, we rely upon research and development work conducted by third parties as the primary source of our therapeutic candidates. As such, we have obtained our rights to the majority of our therapeutic candidates through in-license agreements entered into with universities, research institutions and biotechnology companies that invent and own the intellectual property underlying our candidates. There is no assurance that such in-licenses or rights will not be terminated or expire due to a material breach of the agreements, such as a failure on our part to achieve certain progress milestones set forth in the terms of the in-licenses or due to the loss of the rights to the underlying intellectual property by any of our licensors. There is no assurance that we will be able to renew or renegotiate an in-licensing agreement on acceptable terms if and when the agreement terminates. We cannot guarantee that any in-license is enforceable or will not be terminated or converted into a non-exclusive license in the future. The termination of any in-license or our inability to enforce our rights under any in-license would materially and adversely affect our ability to commercialize certain of our therapeutic candidates.
We currently have in-licensing agreements relating to our lead therapeutic candidates under clinical development. In April 2004, we in-licensed the rights to BL-1020 and BL-1021, and one other compound, under a research and license agreement with Bar Ilan Research and Development and Ramot. Under the research and license agreement, we are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop, commercialize and market the licensed technology, including meeting certain specified diligence goals. In January 2005, we in-licensed the rights to BL-1040 under a license agreement with B.G. Negev Technologies and Applications Ltd., the technology transfer company of Ben Gurion University, or B.G. Negev Technologies. Under the BL-1040 license agreement, we are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop the licensed technology in accordance with a specified development plan, including meeting certain specified diligence goals. In November 2007, we in-licensed the rights to develop and commercialize BL-5010 under a license agreement with Innovative Pharmaceutical Concepts, Inc., or IPC. Under the IPC license agreement, we are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop the licensed technology in accordance with a specified development plan, including meeting certain specified diligence goals. Last, in June 2011, we in-licensed the rights to develop, have developed, manufacture, have manufactured, use, market, distribute, export, import and/or sell BL-7040 under a license agreement from Yissum. Under the BL-7040 license agreement, we are responsible for, and are required to exert, reasonable commercial efforts to carry out the development, regulatory, manufacturing, and marketing work necessary to develop and commercialize products under the agreement in accordance with a specified development plan.
Each of the foregoing in-licensing agreements, or the obligation to pay royalties thereunder, will generally remain in effect until the expiration, under the applicable agreement, of all of the licensing, royalty and sublicense revenue obligations to the applicable licensors, determined on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis. We may terminate any in-licensing agreement by providing 60 days’ prior written notice to Ramot, in the case of the BL-1020/BL-1021 in-licensing agreement or to B.G. Negev Technologies, in the case of the BL-1040 in-licensing agreement. We may terminate the BL-5010 in-licensing agreement or the BL-7040 in-licensing agreement upon 30 days’ prior written notice. However, if we elect to terminate the BL-5010 in-licensing agreement without cause, we may be required to fund the completion of certain clinical trials of the licensed technology in an amount not to exceed $600,000. We may also elect to terminate the BL-5010 in-licensing agreement upon 60 days’ prior written notice to IPC for scientific, regulatory or medical reasons which, as determined by our Scientific Advisory Board, would prevent us from continuing the development of the licensed technology pursuant to the agreed upon development plan.
Any party to any of the four in-licensing agreements may terminate the respective agreement for material breach by the other party if the breaching party is unable to cure the breach within an agreed upon period, generally 30 days to 90 days, after receiving written notice of the breach from the non-breaching party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of the BL-1020 in-licensing agreement, Ramot, but not Bar Ilan Research and Development, has the right to provide us with notice of material breach and to terminate the agreement in the event such breach is not cured within the applicable timeframe. In addition, with respect to the BL-1040 in-licensing agreement, the breaching party is entitled to 60 days’ prior written notice of the material breach prior to termination instead of 30 days. Each of the four in-licensing agreements provide that with respect to any termination for material breach, if the breach is not susceptible to cure within the stated period and the breaching party uses diligent, good faith efforts to cure such breach, the stated period will be extended by an additional 30 days. In addition, either party to one of the four in-licensing agreements (except Bar Ilan Research and Development, in the case of the BL-1020 in-licensing agreement) may terminate the agreement upon notice to the other upon the occurrence of certain bankruptcy events.
Patent protection for our products is important and uncertain.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability, and the ability of our licensees and licensors to obtain patent protection for our therapeutic candidates, maintain the confidentiality of our trade secrets and know how, operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others and prevent others from infringing our proprietary rights.
We try to protect our proprietary position by, among other things, filing U.S., European, Israeli and other patent applications related to our proprietary products, technologies, inventions and improvements that may be important to the continuing development of our therapeutic candidates. As of September 30, 2011, our portfolio of owned and licensed patents consists of 15 patent families that, collectively, contain over 21 issued patents and over 67 patent applications relating to our clinical candidates. We are also pursuing patent protection for other drug candidates in our pipeline.
Because the patent position of biopharmaceutical companies involves complex legal and factual questions, we cannot predict the validity and enforceability of patents with certainty. Our issued patents and the issued patents of our licensees or licensors may not provide us with any competitive advantages, or may be held invalid or unenforceable as a result of legal challenges by third parties. Thus, any patents that we own or license from others may not provide any protection against competitors. Our pending patent applications, those we may file in the future or those we may license from third parties may not result in patents being issued. If these patents are issued, they may not provide us with proprietary protection or competitive advantages against competitors with similar technology. The degree of future protection to be afforded by our proprietary rights is uncertain because legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep our competitive advantage.
Patent rights are territorial; thus, the patent protection we do have will only extend to those countries in which we have issued patents. Even so, the laws of certain countries do not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States and Israel. For example, the patent laws of China and India are relatively new and are not as developed as are older, more established patent laws of other countries. Competitors may successfully challenge our patents, produce similar drugs or products that do not infringe our patents, or produce drugs in countries where we have not applied for patent protection or that do not respect our patents. Furthermore, it is not possible to know the scope of claims that will be allowed in published applications and it is also not possible to know which claims of granted patents, if any, will be deemed enforceable in a court of law.
Our technology may infringe the rights of third parties. The nature of claims contained in unpublished patent filings around the world is unknown to us and it is not possible to know which countries patent holders may choose for the extension of their filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, or other mechanisms. Any infringement by us of the proprietary rights of third parties may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets or know-how, such proprietary information may be used by others to compete against us.
We rely on a combination of patents, trade secrets, know-how, technology, trademarks and regulatory exclusivity to maintain our competitive position. We generally try to protect trade secrets, know-how and technology by entering into confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements with parties that have access to it, such as our licensees, employees, contractors and consultants. We also enter into agreements that purport to require the disclosure and assignment to us of the rights to the ideas, developments, discoveries and inventions of our employees, advisors, research collaborators, contractors and consultants while we employ or engage them. However, these agreements can be difficult and costly to enforce or may not provide adequate remedies. Any of these parties may breach the confidentiality agreements and willfully or unintentionally disclose our confidential information, or our competitors might learn of the information in some other way. The disclosure to, or independent development by, a competitor of any trade secret, know-how or other technology not protected by a patent could materially adversely affect any competitive advantage we may have over any such competitor.
To the extent that any of our employees, advisors, research collaborators, contractors or consultants independently develop, or use independently developed, intellectual property in connection with any of our projects, disputes may arise as to the proprietary rights to this type of information. If a dispute arises with respect to any proprietary right, enforcement of our rights can be costly and unpredictable and a court may determine that the right belongs to a third party.
Legal proceedings or third-party claims of intellectual property infringement may require us to spend substantial time and money and could prevent us from developing or commercializing products.
The development, manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale or importation of our therapeutic candidates may infringe on the claims of third-party patents. A party might file an infringement action against us. The cost to us of any patent litigation or other proceeding, even if resolved in our favor, could be substantial. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively because of their substantially greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation or defense of a patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace. Patent litigation and other proceedings may also absorb significant management time. Consequently, we are unable to guarantee that we will be able to manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell or import our therapeutic candidates in the event of an infringement action. At present, we are not aware of pending or threatened patent infringement actions against us.
In the event of patent infringement claims, or to avoid potential claims, we may choose or be required to seek a license from a third party and would most likely be required to pay license fees or royalties or both. These licenses may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Even if we were able to obtain a license, the rights may be non-exclusive, which could potentially limit our competitive advantage. Ultimately, we could be prevented from commercializing a therapeutic candidate or be forced to cease some aspect of our business operations if, as a result of actual or threatened patent infringement claims, we are unable to enter into licenses on acceptable terms. This inability to enter into licenses could harm our business significantly. At present, we have not received any written demands from third parties that we take a license under their patents nor have we received any notice form a third party accusing us of patent infringement.
Our license agreement with Ikaria contains, and any contract that we enter into with licensors in the future will likely contain, indemnity provisions that obligate us to indemnify the licensor against any losses arising from infringement of third party intellectual property rights. In addition, our in-license agreements contain provisions that obligate us to indemnify the licensors against any damages arising from the development, manufacture and use of products developed on the basis of the in-licensed intellectual property.
We may be subject to other patent-related litigation or proceedings that could be costly to defend and uncertain in their outcome.
In addition to infringement claims against us, we may in the future become a party to other patent litigation or proceedings, including interference or re-examination proceedings filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or opposition proceedings in other foreign patent offices regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our products and technology, as well as other disputes regarding intellectual property rights with licensees, licensors or others with whom we have contractual or other business relationships. Post-issuance oppositions are not uncommon and we, our licensee or our licensor will be required to defend these opposition procedures as a matter of course. Opposition procedures may be costly, and there is a risk that we may not prevail.
We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that we or our employees or contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.
Many of our employees and contractors were previously employed at universities or other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Although no claims against us are currently pending, we may be subject to claims that we or any employee or contractor has inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of his or her former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. A loss of key research personnel or their work product could hamper or prevent our ability to commercialize certain therapeutic candidates, which could severely harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management.
The intellectual property associated with certain of our therapeutic candidates, including BL-1040, is pledged as security for our obligations associated with the Office of the Chief Scientist of the Israeli Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor’s biotechnology incubator program.
In May 2004, the OCS invited companies to bid to establish and operate OCS-funded biotechnological incubators to provide a physical, organized and professional platform for commercializing biotechnological research and development projects. We submitted a proposal to operate a biotechnological incubator, and our proposal was selected by the OCS. Accordingly, we entered into an incubator agreement with the OCS in January 2005. The initial agreement was scheduled to expire on December 31, 2010 but at the end of 2010, the OCS agreed to renew the agreement for an additional two years, with an option to renew for another one-year period at the same terms and conditions, subject to OCS approval. The funding provided to us under the incubator agreement is in the form of separate loans for each approved project initiated by our incubator. Each loan is subject to repayment solely out of the revenues generated by that project. If revenues are not achieved with respect to a project, the loan for the project will be forgiven, subject to certain terms and conditions. If revenues are achieved with respect to a project, the loans will be repaid from such revenues, with interest. The interest rates for the loans are prescribed by the OCS at the commencement of each loan, and range from 3.11% to 5.34%, but are doubled if the loan is not repaid within five years of our achievement of certain development milestones, or within two years following the completion of the applicable incubator program. All intellectual property held by our incubator for development through the incubator program is pledged as security for our obligations under the incubator agreement. If we are unable to meet our obligations under the incubator agreement, the intellectual property held by the incubator would be subject to seizure and would not be available for sale for the benefit of or distribution to our creditors or shareholders in the event of a reorganization or insolvency. Any loss of the rights to the intellectual property held by our incubator would have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects. In addition, all intellectual property held by the incubator program is subject to restrictions imposed by the OCS with respect to transfer abroad of rights to manufacture products based on the intellectual property or of rights to the intellectual property itself, as described more fully under “Business — Government Regulation and Funding — Israeli Government Programs — Office of the Chief Scientist.”
Risks Related to our Ordinary Shares and ADSs
We may be a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes in 2011 or in any subsequent year. There may be negative tax consequences for U.S. taxpayers that are holders of our ordinary shares or our ADSs.
We will be treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes in any taxable year in which either (i) at least 75% of our gross income is “passive income” or (ii) on average at least 50% of our assets by value produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income. Passive income for this purpose generally includes, among other things, certain dividends, interest, royalties, rents and gains from commodities and securities transactions and from the sale or exchange of property that gives rise to passive income. Passive income also includes amounts derived by reason of the temporary investment of funds, including those raised in a public offering. In determining whether a non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC, a proportionate share of the income and assets of each corporation in which it owns, directly or indirectly, at least a 25% interest (by value) is taken into account. We believe that we were a PFIC during certain prior years and, although we have not determined whether we will be a PFIC in 2012, or in any subsequent year, our operating results for any such years may cause us to be a PFIC. If we are a PFIC in 2012, or any subsequent year, and a U.S. shareholder does not make an election to treat us as a “qualified electing fund,” or QEF, or make a “mark-to-market” election, then “excess distributions” to a U.S. shareholder, and any gain realized on the sale or other disposition of our ordinary shares or ADSs will be subject to special rules. Under these rules: (i) the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over the U.S. shareholder’s holding period for the ordinary shares (or ADSs, as the case may be); (ii) the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any period prior to the first day of the first taxable year in which we were a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income; and (iii) the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years would be subject to tax at the highest rate of tax in effect for the applicable class of taxpayer for that year, and an interest charge for the deemed deferral benefit would be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such other taxable year. In addition, if the U.S. Internal Revenue Service determines that we are a PFIC for a year with respect to which we have determined that we were not a PFIC, it may be too late for a U.S. shareholder to make a timely QEF or mark-to-market election. U.S. shareholders who hold our ordinary shares or ADSs during a period when we are a PFIC will be subject to the foregoing rules, even if we cease to be a PFIC in subsequent years, subject to exceptions for U.S. shareholders who made a timely QEF or mark-to-market election. A U.S. shareholder can make a QEF election by completing the relevant portions of and filing IRS Form 8621 in accordance with the instructions thereto. Upon request, we will annually furnish U.S. shareholders with information needed in order to complete IRS Form 8621 (which form would be required to be filed with the IRS on an annual basis by the U.S. shareholder) and to make and maintain a valid QEF election for any year in which we or any of our subsidiaries are a PFIC.
The market prices of our ordinary shares and ADSs are subject to fluctuation, which could result in substantial losses by our investors.
The stock market in general and the market prices of our ordinary shares on the TASE and ADSs on the Nasdaq Capital Market, in particular, are subject to fluctuation, and changes in these prices may be unrelated to our operating performance. We expect that the market prices of our ordinary shares and ADSs will continue to be subject to wide fluctuations. The market price of our ordinary shares and ADSs are and will be subject to a number of factors, including:
|
|
•
|
announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or others;
|
|
|
•
|
announcements by us of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, in-licensing, out-licensing, joint ventures or capital commitments;
|
|
|
•
|
expiration or terminations of licenses, research contracts or other collaboration agreements;
|
|
|
•
|
public concern as to the safety of drugs we, our licensees or others develop;
|
|
|
•
|
general market conditions;
|
|
|
•
|
the volatility of market prices for shares of biotechnology companies generally;
|
|
|
•
|
success of research and development projects;
|
|
|
•
|
departure of key personnel;
|
|
|
•
|
developments concerning intellectual property rights or regulatory approvals;
|
|
|
•
|
variations in our and our competitors’ results of operations;
|
|
|
•
|
changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts, if our ordinary shares or ADSs are covered by analysts;
|
|
|
•
|
changes in government regulations or patent decisions;
|
|
|
•
|
developments by our licensees; and
|
|
|
•
|
general market conditions and other factors, including factors unrelated to our operating performance.
|
These factors and any corresponding price fluctuations may materially and adversely affect the market price of our ordinary shares and result in substantial losses by our investors.
Additionally, market prices for securities of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies historically have been very volatile. The market for these securities has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations for reasons unrelated to the operating performance of any one company. In the past, following periods of market volatility, shareholders have often instituted securities class action litigation. If we were involved in securities litigation, it could have a substantial cost and divert resources and attention of management from our business, even if we are successful.
Future sales of our ordinary shares or ADSs could reduce the market price of our ordinary shares and ADSs.
Substantial sales of our ordinary shares or ADSs, either on the TASE or on the Nasdaq Capital Market, may cause the market price of our ordinary shares or ADSs to decline. All of our outstanding ordinary shares are registered and available for sale in Israel. Sales by us or our securityholders of substantial amounts of our ordinary shares or ADSs, or the perception that these sales may occur in the future, could cause a reduction in the market price of our ordinary shares or ADSs.
On February 22, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 5,244,301 of our ADSs for a purchase price of $2.86 per ADS. Purchasers also received an aggregate of 2,622,157 five-year warrants to purchase ADSs at an exercise price of $3.57 per ADS.
The issuance of any additional ordinary shares, any additional ADSs, or any securities that are exercisable for or convertible into our ordinary shares or ADSs, may have an adverse effect on the market price of our ordinary shares and ADSs and will have a dilutive effect on our shareholders.
Raising additional capital by issuing securities may cause dilution to existing shareholders.
We may need to raise substantial future capital to continue to complete clinical development and commercialize our products and therapeutic candidates and to conduct the research and development and clinical and regulatory activities necessary to bring our therapeutic candidates to market. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
|
|
•
|
the failure to obtain regulatory approval or achieve commercial success of our therapeutic candidates, including BL-1020, BL-1021, BL-1040, BL-5010 and BL-7040;
|
|
|
•
|
our success in effecting out-licensing arrangements with third-parties;
|
|
|
•
|
our success in establishing other out-licensing arrangements;
|
|
|
•
|
the success of our licensees in selling products that utilize our technologies;
|
|
|
•
|
the results of our preclinical studies and clinical trials for our earlier stage therapeutic candidates, and any decisions to initiate clinical trials if supported by the preclinical results;
|
|
|
•
|
the costs, timing and outcome of regulatory review of our therapeutic candidates that progress to clinical trials;
|
|
|
•
|
the costs of establishing or acquiring specialty sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, if any of our therapeutic candidates are approved, and we decide to commercialize them ourselves;
|
|
|
•
|
the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our issued patents and defending intellectual property-related claims;
|
|
|
•
|
the extent to which we acquire or invest in businesses, products or technologies and other strategic relationships; and
|
|
|
•
|
the costs of financing unanticipated working capital requirements and responding to competitive pressures.
|
If we raise additional funds through licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our therapeutic candidates, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity or convertible debt securities, we will reduce the percentage ownership of our then-existing shareholders, and these securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our existing shareholders. See also “— Future sales of our ordinary shares or ADSs could reduce the market price of our ordinary shares and ADSs.”
Risks Associated with the Nasdaq Capital Market Listing of our ADSs
Our ordinary shares and our ADSs are traded on different markets and this may result in price variations.
Our ordinary shares have been traded on the TASE since February 2007. Our ADSs have been listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market since July 2011. Trading in our securities on these markets takes place in different currencies (dollars on the Nasdaq Capital Market and NIS on the TASE), and at different times (resulting from different time zones, different trading days and different public holidays in the United States and Israel). The trading prices of our securities on these two markets may differ due to these and other factors. Any decrease in the price of our securities on one of these markets could cause a decrease in the trading price of our securities on the other market.
We have incurred additional increased costs as a result of the listing of our ADSs for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market, and our management is required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives and reporting requirements.
As a public company in the United States, we incur additional significant accounting, legal and other expenses as a result of listing our ADSs on the Nasdaq Capital Market. These include costs associated with corporate governance requirements of the SEC and the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, as well as requirements under Section 404 and other provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These rules and regulations have increased our legal and financial compliance costs, introduced new costs such as investor relations, stock exchange listing fees and shareholder reporting, and made some activities more time consuming and costly. Any future changes in the laws and regulations affecting public companies in the United States and Israel, including Section 404 and other provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the rules and regulations adopted by the SEC and the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, as well as applicable Israeli reporting requirements, for so long as they apply to us, will result in increased costs to us as we respond to such changes. These laws, rules and regulations could make it more difficult or more costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of these requirements could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors, our board committees or as executive officers.
As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of applicable SEC and Nasdaq requirements, which may result in less protection than is accorded to investors under rules applicable to domestic issuers.
As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of those otherwise required under the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market for domestic issuers. For instance, we may follow home country practice in Israel with regard to, among other things, composition of the Board of Directors, director nomination procedure, approval of compensation of officers, and quorum at shareholders’ meetings. In addition, we will follow our home country law, instead of the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, which require that we obtain shareholder approval for certain dilutive events, such as for the establishment or amendment of certain equity based compensation plans, an issuance that will result in a change of control of the company, certain transactions other than a public offering involving issuances of a 20% or more interest in the company and certain acquisitions of the stock or assets of another company. Following our home country governance practices as opposed to the requirements that would otherwise apply to a United States company listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market may provide less protection than is accorded to investors under the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market applicable to domestic issuers. See “— Nasdaq Listing Rules and Home Country Practices.”
In addition, as a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules and regulations under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, related to the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, are not be required under the Exchange Act to file annual, quarterly and current reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as domestic companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act.
If we are unable to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as they apply to a foreign private issuer that is listing on a U.S. exchange for the first time, or our internal controls over financial reporting are not effective, the reliability of our financial statements may be questioned and our stock price and ADS price may suffer.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires companies subject to the reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws to do a comprehensive evaluation of its and its subsidiaries’ internal controls over financial reporting. To comply with this statute, we will be required to document and test our internal control procedures; our management will be required to assess and issue a report concerning our internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to issue an opinion on management’s assessment of those matters, which will first be tested in connection with the filing of our second annual report on Form 20-F.
The continuous process of strengthening our internal controls and complying with Section 404 is complicated and time-consuming. Furthermore, as our business continues to grow both domestically and internationally, our internal controls will become more complex and will require significantly more resources and attention to ensure our internal controls remain effective overall. During the course of its testing, our management may identify material weaknesses or significant deficiencies, which may not be remedied in a timely manner to meet the deadline imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. If our management cannot favorably assess the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, or our independent registered public accounting firm identifies material weaknesses in our internal controls, investor confidence in our financial results may weaken, and the market price of our securities may suffer.
Risks Related to our Operations in Israel
We conduct our operations in Israel and therefore our results may be adversely affected by political, economic and military instability in Israel and its region.
Our headquarters, all of our operations and some of our suppliers and third party contractors are located in central Israel and our key employees, officers and most of our directors are residents of Israel. Accordingly, political, economic and military conditions in Israel and the surrounding region may directly affect our business. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between Israel and its Arab neighbors. Any hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade within Israel or between Israel and its trading partners could adversely affect our operations and results of operations and could make it more difficult for us to raise capital. During the winter of 2008, Israel was engaged in an armed conflict with Hamas, a militia group and political party operating in the Gaza Strip, and during the summer of 2006, Israel was engaged in an armed conflict with Hezbollah, a Lebanese Islamist Shiite militia group and political party. These conflicts involved missile strikes against civilian targets in various parts of Israel, and negatively affected business conditions in Israel. Recent political uprisings and social unrest in various countries in the Middle East and North Africa are affecting the political stability of those countries. This instability may lead to deterioration of the political relationships that exist between Israel and these countries, and have raised concerns regarding security in the region and the potential for armed conflict. Among other things, this instability may affect the global economy and marketplace through changes in oil and gas process. Any armed conflicts, terrorist activities or political instability in the region could adversely affect business conditions and could harm our results of operations. For example, any major escalation in hostilities in the region could result in a portion of our employees being called up to perform military duty for an extended period of time. Parties with whom we do business have sometimes declined to travel to Israel during periods of heightened unrest or tension, forcing us to make alternative arrangements when necessary. In addition, the political and security situation in Israel may result in parties with whom we have agreements involving performance in Israel claiming that they are not obligated to perform their commitments under those agreements pursuant to force majeure provisions in the agreements.
Our commercial insurance does not cover losses that may occur as a result of events associated with the security situation in the Middle East. Although the Israeli government currently covers the reinstatement value of direct damages that are caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war, we cannot assure you that this government coverage will be maintained. Any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business. Any armed conflicts or political instability in the region would likely negatively affect business conditions and could harm our results of operations.
Further, in the past, the State of Israel and Israeli companies have been subjected to an economic boycott. Several countries still restrict business with the State of Israel and with Israeli companies. These restrictive laws and policies may have an adverse impact on our operating results, financial condition or the expansion of our business.
Our operations may be disrupted as a result of the obligation of management or key personnel to perform military service.
Many of our male employees in Israel, including members of our senior management, are obligated to perform one month, and in some cases more, of annual military reserve duty until they reach the age of 45 (or older, for reservists with certain occupations) and, in the event of a military conflict, may be called to active duty. In response to increases in terrorist activity, there have been periods of significant call-ups of military reservists, and recently some of our employees have been called up in connection with armed conflicts. It is possible that there will be military reserve duty call-ups in the future. Our operations could be disrupted by the absence of a significant number of our employees or of one or more of our key employees. Such disruption could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because a certain portion of our expenses is incurred in currencies other than the NIS, our results of operations may be harmed by currency fluctuations and inflation.
Our reporting and functional currency is the NIS, and we pay a substantial portion of our expenses in NIS. The revenues from our arrangements with Ikaria are payable in U.S. dollars and we expect our revenues from future licensing arrangements to be denominated in U.S. dollars or in Euros. As a result, we are exposed to the currency fluctuation risks relating to the recording of our revenues in NIS. For example, if the NIS strengthens against either the U.S. dollar or the Euro, our reported revenues in NIS may be lower than anticipated. The Israeli rate of inflation has not offset or compounded the effects caused by fluctuations between the NIS and the U.S. dollar or the Euro. To date, we have not engaged in hedging transactions. Although the Israeli rate of inflation has not had a material adverse effect on our financial condition during 2008, 2009, 2010 or 2011 to date, we may, in the future, decide to enter into currency hedging transactions to decrease the risk of financial exposure from fluctuations in the exchange rates of the currencies mentioned above in relation to the NIS. These measures, however, may not adequately protect us from material adverse effects.
We have received Israeli government grants and loans for the operation of a biotechnology incubator and for certain research and development expenditures. The terms of these grants and loans may require us to satisfy specified conditions in order to manufacture products and transfer technologies outside of Israel. We may be required to pay penalties in addition to repayment of the grants and loans. Such grants and loans may be terminated or reduced in the future, which would increase our costs.
Our research and development efforts, including the operation of our biotechnology incubator, have been financed, in part, through grants and loans that we have received from the OCS. Of our 18 current development projects, seven have been funded by the OCS, either directly or through our incubator: BL-1020, BL-1021, BL-1040, BL-5040, BL-6010, BL-6030 and BL-7020. Of the seven projects funded by the OCS, six have been funded through our incubator. We therefore must comply with the requirements of the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Industrial Research and Development, 1984, and related regulations, or the Research Law. As of September 30, 2011, we have received approximately NIS 69.5 million ($18.7 million) in grants and loans from the OCS, including accrued interest, of which approximately NIS 47.9 million ($12.9 million) was granted in the form of loans to our biotechnology incubator. Such amounts include loans equal to approximately NIS 32.9 million ($8.9 million) for projects that have been terminated, which we will not be required to repay. When know-how, technology or products are developed using OCS grants, the terms of these grants and the Research Law restrict the transfer of that know-how (as well as know-how that is derived from funded know-how) and the development or manufacture of those products out of Israel without the prior approval of the OCS. Therefore, the discretionary approval of an OCS committee will be required for any transfer to third parties of our therapeutic candidates developed with OCS funding, for the purpose of the commercialization of our product candidates. There is no assurance that we will receive the required approvals should we wish to transfer this technology or development out of Israel in the future. Furthermore, the OCS committee may impose certain conditions on any arrangement under which we transfer technology or development out of Israel. Transfers of know-how from OCS funded programs, including our biotechnology incubator, even if approved by the OCS, may be subject to restrictions set forth in the Research Law, and may include payments to the OCS, as described more fully under “Business — Government Regulation and Funding — Israeli Government Programs — Office of the Chief Scientist.”
The transfer abroad of the manufacturing of any OCS-supported product or technology is also subject to various conditions, including the payment of increased royalties equal to, in the aggregate, up to 300% of the total grant amounts received in connection with the product or technology, plus interest, depending on the portion of total manufacturing that is performed outside of Israel. Payment of the increased royalties would constitute the total repayment amount required with respect to the OCS grants received for the development of the products or technology for which the manufacturing is performed outside of Israel. In addition, any decrease in the percentage of manufacture performed in Israel of any product or technology, as originally declared in the application to the OCS with respect to the product or technology, may require us to notify, or to obtain the approval of, the OCS, and may result in increased royalty payments to the OCS of up to 300% of the total grant amounts received in connection with the product or technology, plus interest, depending on the portion of total manufacturing that is performed outside of Israel. These restrictions may impair our ability to sell our technology assets or to outsource or transfer development or manufacturing activities with respect to any product or technology. These restrictions continue to apply even after we have repaid any grants, in whole or in part.
We cannot be certain that any approval of the OCS will be obtained on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. Furthermore, if we undertake a transaction involving the transfer to a non-Israeli entity of technology developed with OCS funding pursuant to a merger or similar transaction, the consideration available to our shareholders may be reduced by the amounts we are required to pay to the OCS. If we fail to comply with the conditions imposed by the OCS, including the payment of royalties with respect to grants received, we may be required to refund any payments previously received, together with interest and penalties, and may be subject to criminal penalties. See “Business— Government Regulation and Funding — Israeli Government Programs.”
Provisions of Israeli law may delay, prevent or otherwise impede a merger with, or an acquisition of, our company, which could prevent a change of control, even when the terms of such a transaction are favorable to us and our shareholders.
Israeli corporate law regulates mergers, requires tender offers for acquisitions of shares above specified thresholds, requires special approvals for transactions involving directors, officers or significant shareholders and regulates other matters that may be relevant to these types of transactions. For example, a merger may not be consummated unless at least 50 days have passed from the date that a merger proposal was filed by each merging company with the Israel Registrar of Companies and at least 30 days from the date that the shareholders of both merging companies approved the merger. In addition, a majority of each class of securities of the target company must approve a merger. Moreover, a full tender offer can only be completed if the acquirer receives at least 95% of the issued share capital (provided that a majority of the offerees that do not have a personal interest in such tender offer shall have approved the tender offer, except that if the total votes to reject the tender offer represent less than 2% of the company’s issued and outstanding share capital, in the aggregate, approval by a majority of the offerees that do not have a personal interest in such tender offer is not required to complete the tender offer), and the shareholders, including those who indicated their acceptance of the tender offer, may, at any time within six months following the completion of the tender offer, petition the court to alter the consideration for the acquisition (unless the acquirer stipulated in the tender offer that a shareholder that accepts the offer may not seek appraisal rights).
Furthermore, Israeli tax considerations may make potential transactions unappealing to us or to our shareholders whose country of residence does not have a tax treaty with Israel exempting such shareholders from Israeli tax. For example, Israeli tax law does not recognize tax-free share exchanges to the same extent as U.S. tax law. With respect to mergers, Israeli tax law allows for tax deferral in certain circumstances but makes the deferral contingent on the fulfillment of numerous conditions, including a holding period of two years from the date of the transaction during which sales and dispositions of shares of the participating companies are restricted. Moreover, with respect to certain share swap transactions, the tax deferral is limited in time, and when such time expires, the tax becomes payable even if no actual disposition of the shares has occurred.
These and other similar provisions could delay, prevent or impede an acquisition of us or our merger with another company, even if such an acquisition or merger would be beneficial to us or to our shareholders.
We have received Israeli government grants and loans for the operation of a biotechnology incubator and for certain research and development expenditures. The terms of these grants and loans may require us to satisfy specified conditions in order to manufacture products and transfer technologies outside of Israel. We may be required to pay penalties in addition to repayment of the grants and loans. Such grants and loans may be terminated or reduced in the future, which would increase our costs. See “Business — Government Regulation and Funding — Israeli Government Programs.”
It may be difficult to enforce a U.S. judgment against us and our officers and directors named in this prospectus in Israel or the United States, or to serve process on our officers and directors.
We are incorporated in Israel. Most of our executive officers and all of our directors reside outside of the United States, and all of our assets and most of the assets of our executive officers and directors are located outside of the United States. Therefore, a judgment obtained against us or most of our executive officers and all of our directors in the United States, including one based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws, may not be collectible in the United States and may not be enforced by an Israeli court. It also may be difficult for you to effect service of process on these persons in the United States or to assert U.S. securities law claims in original actions instituted in Israel.
Your rights and responsibilities as a shareholder will be governed by Israeli law which may differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders of U.S. companies.
We are incorporated under Israeli law. The rights and responsibilities of the holders of our ordinary shares are governed by our Articles of Association and Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in typical U.S.-based corporations. In particular, a shareholder of an Israeli company has a duty to act in good faith toward the company and other shareholders and to refrain from abusing its power in the company, including, among other things, in voting at the general meeting of shareholders on matters such as amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases in a company’s authorized share capital, mergers and acquisitions and interested party transactions requiring shareholder approval. In addition, a shareholder who knows that it possesses the power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote or to appoint or prevent the appointment of a director or executive officer in the company has a duty of fairness toward the company. There is limited case law available to assist us in understanding the implications of these provisions that govern shareholders’ actions. These provisions may be interpreted to impose additional obligations and liabilities on holders of our ordinary shares that are not typically imposed on shareholders of U.S. corporations.
FORWARD
-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements under the sections entitled “Prospectus Summary,” “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business” and elsewhere in this prospectus constitute forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms including “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. In addition, the sections of this prospectus entitled “Summary” and “Business” contain information obtained from independent industry sources that we have not independently verified. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Unless we are required to do so under U.S. federal securities laws or other applicable laws, we do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements.
Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
|
|
·
|
the initiation, timing, progress and results of our preclinical studies, clinical trials, and other therapeutic candidate development efforts;
|
|
|
·
|
our ability to advance our therapeutic candidates into clinical trials or to successfully complete our preclinical studies or clinical trials;
|
|
|
·
|
our receipt of regulatory approvals for our therapeutic candidates, and the timing of other regulatory filings and approvals;
|
|
|
·
|
the clinical development, commercialization, and market acceptance of our therapeutic candidates;
|
|
|
·
|
our ability to establish and maintain corporate collaborations;
|
|
|
·
|
the interpretation of the properties and characteristics of our therapeutic candidates and of the results obtained with our therapeutic candidates in preclinical studies or clinical trials;
|
|
|
·
|
the implementation of our business model, strategic plans for our business and therapeutic candidates;
|
|
|
·
|
the scope of protection we are able to establish and maintain for intellectual property rights covering our therapeutic candidates and our ability to operate our business without infringing the intellectual property rights of others;
|
|
|
·
|
estimates of our expenses, future revenues, capital requirements and our needs for additional financing;
|
|
|
·
|
competitive companies, technologies and our industry; and
|
|
|
·
|
statements as to the impact of the political and security situation in Israel on our business.
|
EXCHANGE
RATE INFORMATION
We prepare our financial statements in NIS. No representation is made that the NIS amounts referred to in this prospectus could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at any particular rate or at all.
Fluctuations in the exchange rates between the NIS and the U.S. dollar will affect the dollar amounts received by owners of our ordinary shares on payment of dividends, if any, paid in NIS.
The following table sets forth information regarding the exchange rates of U.S. dollars per NIS for the periods indicated. Average rates are calculated by using the daily representative rates as reported by the Bank of Israel on the last day of each month during the periods presented.
|
NIS per U.S. $
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
High
|
Low
|
Average
|
Period End
|
||||||||||||
|
2011
|
3.821 | 3.363 | 3.578 | 3.821 | ||||||||||||
|
2010
|
3.894 | 3.549 | 3.730 | 3.549 | ||||||||||||
|
2009
|
4.256 | 3.690 | 3.923 | 3.775 | ||||||||||||
|
2008
|
4.022 | 3.230 | 3.586 | 3.802 | ||||||||||||
|
2007
|
4.342 | 3.830 | 4.110 | 3.846 | ||||||||||||
|
2006
|
4.725 | 4.176 | 4.453 | 4.225 | ||||||||||||
The following table sets forth the high and low daily representative rates for the NIS as reported by the Bank of Israel for each of the prior six months.
|
NIS per U.S. $
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Month
|
High
|
Low
|
Average
|
Period End
|
||||||||||||
|
February 2012 (through February 27, 2012)
|
3.803
|
3.700 |
3.737
|
3.803
|
||||||||||||
|
January 2012
|
3.854 | 3.733 | 3.809 | 3.733 | ||||||||||||
|
December 2011
|
3.821 | 3.727 | 3.774 | 3.821 | ||||||||||||
|
November 2011
|
3.800 | 3.650 | 3.726 | 3.793 | ||||||||||||
|
October 2011
|
3.763 | 3.602 | 3.666 | 3.604 | ||||||||||||
|
September 2011
|
3.725 | 3.574 | 3.681 | 3.712 | ||||||||||||
|
August 2011
|
3.626 | 3.412 | 3.543 | 3.558 | ||||||||||||
On February 27, 2012, the closing representative rate was $1.00 to NIS 3.803, as reported by the Bank of Israel.
PRICE
RANGE OF OUR ORDINARY SHARES
Our ordinary shares have been trading on the TASE under the symbol “BLRX” since February 2007.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low closing sale prices of our ordinary shares on the TASE in NIS and U.S. dollars. U.S. dollar per ordinary share amounts are calculated using the U.S. dollar representative rate of exchange on the date to which the high or low market price is applicable, as reported by the Bank of Israel.
|
NIS
|
U.S.$
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Price Per
Ordinary Share
|
Price Per
Ordinary Share
|
|||||||||||||||
|
High
|
Low
|
High
|
Low
|
|||||||||||||
|
Annual:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
3.24 | 1.13 | 0.91 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||
|
2010
|
4.75 | 2.86 | 1.26 | 0.80 | ||||||||||||
|
2009
|
5.68 | 0.86 | 1.53 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||
|
2008
|
4.25 | 0.69 | 1.10 | 0.17 | ||||||||||||
|
2007 (from February 8, 2007)
|
6.65 | 3.80 | 1.57 | 0.89 | ||||||||||||
|
Quarterly:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Fourth Quarter 2011
|
1.48 | 1.14 | 0.41 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||
|
Third Quarter 2011
|
1.92 | 1.13 | 0.56 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||
|
Second Quarter 2011
|
2.54 | 1.58 | 0.74 | 0.45 | ||||||||||||
|
First Quarter 2011
|
3.24 | 2.15 | 0.91 | 0.60 | ||||||||||||
|
Fourth Quarter 2010
|
3.59 | 2.86 | 0.99 | 0.80 | ||||||||||||
|
Third Quarter 2010
|
3.82 | 3.21 | 1.01 | 0.87 | ||||||||||||
|
Second Quarter 2010
|
4.69 | 3.00 | 1.27 | 0.78 | ||||||||||||
|
First Quarter 2010
|
4.75 | 3.80 | 1.26 | 1.03 | ||||||||||||
|
Fourth Quarter 2009
|
5.68 | 3.50 | 1.53 | 0.93 | ||||||||||||
|
Third Quarter 2009
|
4.60 | 1.74 | 1.22 | 0.44 | ||||||||||||
|
Second Quarter 2009
|
2.79 | 1.33 | 0.72 | 0.32 | ||||||||||||
|
First Quarter 2009
|
1.86 | 0.86 | 0.47 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||
|
Most Recent Six Months:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
February 2012 (through February 27, 2012)
|
1.87 |
1.21
|
0.50 |
0.32
|
||||||||||||
|
January 2012
|
2.12 | 1.16 | 0.56 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||
|
December 2011
|
1.29 | 1.14 | 0.34 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||
|
November 2011
|
1.35 | 1.15 | 0.37 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||
|
October 2011
|
1.48 | 1.18 | 0.41 | 0.31 | ||||||||||||
|
September 2011
|
1.39 | 1.13 | 0.39 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||
|
August 2011
|
1.62 | 1.17 | 0.48 | 0.33 | ||||||||||||
|
July 2011
|
1.92 | 1.65 | 0.56 | 0.48 | ||||||||||||
On February 27, 2012, the last reported sales price of our ordinary shares on the TASE was NIS 1.209 per share, or $0.32 per share (based on the exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel for such date). On February 27, 2012, the exchange rate of the NIS to the dollar was $1.00 = NIS 3.803, as reported by the Bank of Israel. As of February 27, 2012 there were three shareholders of record of our ordinary shares. The number of record holders is not representative of the number of beneficial holders of our ordinary shares.
PRICE
RANGE OF OUR ADSs
Our ADSs have been trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “BLRX” since July 2011.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low closing sale prices of our ADSs on the Nasdaq Capital Market in U.S. dollars.
|
U.S.$
|
||||||||
|
Price Per
ADS
|
||||||||
|
High
|
Low
|
|||||||
|
Annual:
|
||||||||
|
2011 (from July 25, 2011)
|
5.59 | 2.75 | ||||||
|
Quarterly:
|
||||||||
|
First Quarter 2012(through February 27, 2012)
|
5.55 | 2.90 | ||||||
|
Fourth Quarter 2011
|
4.21 | 3.01 | ||||||
|
Third Quarter 2011(from July 25, 2011)
|
5.59 | 2.75 | ||||||
|
Most Recent Six Months:
|
||||||||
|
February 2012 (through February 27, 2012)
|
4.45
|
3.10
|
||||||
|
January 2012
|
5.55 | 2.90 | ||||||
|
December 2011
|
3.38 | 3.01 | ||||||
|
November 2011
|
3.96 | 3.08 | ||||||
|
October 2011
|
4.21 | 2.85 | ||||||
|
September 2011
|
4.00 | 2.75 | ||||||
On February 27, 2012, the last reported sales price of our ADSs on the Nasdaq Capital Market was $3.10 per ADS. As of February 27, 2012 there was one shareholder of record of our ADSs. The number of record holders is not representative of the number of beneficial holders of our ADSs.
USE
OF PROCEEDS
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the ADSs or the warrants by the selling shareholders. All net proceeds from the sale of the ADSs and the warrants covered by this prospectus will go to the selling shareholders. We expect that the selling shareholders will sell their ADSs and warrants as described under “Plan of Distribution.”
We may receive proceeds from the exercise of the warrants and issuance of the warrant ADSs to the extent that the warrants are exercised for cash. Warrants, however, are exercisable on a cashless basis under certain circumstances. If all of the warrants were exercised for cash in full, the proceeds would be approximately $9.4 million. We intend to use the net proceeds of such warrant exercise, if any, for research and development, marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses, and for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Pending such uses, we intend to invest the net proceeds in short-term, interest-bearing, investment grade securities or as otherwise pursuant our customary investment policies. We can make no assurances that any of the warrants will be exercised, or if exercised, that they will be exercised for cash, the quantity which will be exercised or in the period in which they will be exercised.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have never declared or paid cash dividends to our shareholders and we do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to reinvest any earnings in developing and expanding our business. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, our financial condition, operating results, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects, applicable law and other factors our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
The following table sets forth our consolidated capitalization as determined in accordance with IFRS as of September 30, 2011. This table should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. Additionally, this table does not include the impact of a private placement, completed in February 2012, which, after deducting fees and expenses, raised approximately $14.1 million from the issuance of an aggregate of 5,244,301 ADSs at a purchase price of $2.86 per ADS, and warrants to purchase up to 2,622,157 additional ADSs at an exercise price of $3.57 per ADS.
|
As of September, 2011
|
|||||||
|
(NIS
in thousands)
|
(U.S.$
in thousands)
(1)
|
||||||
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|||||||
|
Long term loan, less current maturities
|
191
|
51
|
|||||
|
Shareholders’ equity:
|
|||||||
|
Ordinary shares
|
1,236
|
333
|
|||||
|
Warrants
|
6,549
|
1,764
|
|||||
|
Share premium
|
414,780
|
111,740
|
|||||
|
Capital reserve
|
30,023
|
8,088
|
|||||
|
Accumulated loss
|
(353,869
|
)
|
(95,330
|
)
|
|||
|
Total shareholder’s equity
|
98,719
|
26,595
|
|||||
|
Total capitalization (debt and equity)
|
98,910
|
26,646
|
|||||
(1) Calculated using the exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel for September 30, 2011 at the rate of one U.S. dollar per NIS 3.712.
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data for the periods ended and as of the dates indicated. The following selected historical consolidated financial data for our company should be read in conjunction with the historical financial information, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other information provided elsewhere in this prospectus and our consolidated financial statements and related notes. The selected consolidated financial data in this section is not intended to replace the consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety thereby. We derived the selected consolidated financial data as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. In the opinion of our management, our unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the periods indicated therein. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full fiscal years encompassing those periods.
We have derived the selected consolidated financial statements as of and for the periods ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Our consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus were prepared in NIS in accordance with IFRS.
| Year Ended December 31, |
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated Statements Of Operations Data: (1)
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2010
|
2011
|
2011 (2)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except share and per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NIS |
U.S.$
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
- | - | - | 63,909 | 113,160 | 113,160 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cost of revenues
|
- | - | - | (22,622 | ) | (25,571 | ) | (25,271 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
- | - | - | (3,085 | ) | (4,609 | ) | (3,506 | ) | (2,431 | ) | (655 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Research and development, expenses net
|
(42,193 | ) | (75,863 | ) | (106,156 | ) | (90,302 | ) | (54,966 | ) | (43,769 | ) | (30,044 | ) | (8,094 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
(6,357 | ) | (13,611 | ) | (13,083 | ) | (11,182 | ) | (14,875 | ) | (8,914 | ) | (9,546 | ) | (2,572 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Gain on adjusting warrants to fair value
|
- | 27,557 | 3,658 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital loss, net |
(121
|
) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
(48,671 | ) | (61,917 | ) | (115,581 | ) | 63,282 | 13,139 | 31,400 | (42,021 | ) | (11,321 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Financial income
|
584 | 7,875 | 13,001 | 3,928 | 3,056 | 3,056 | 10,785 | 2,906 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Financial expenses
|
(834 | ) | (5,377 | ) | (12,269 | ) | (2,164 | ) | (8,755 | ) | (4,931 | ) | (4,750 | ) | (1,279 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Net profit (loss)
|
(48,921 | ) | (59,419 | ) | (114,849 | ) | (61,158 | ) | 7,440 | 29,525 | (35,986 | ) | (9,694 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Net profit (loss) per ordinary share (3)
|
(1,425.67
|
) | (0.88 | ) | (1.44 | ) | (0.63 | ) | 0.06 | 0.24 | (0.29 | ) | (0.08 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Number of ordinary shares used in computing loss per ordinary share
|
38,521 | 69,302,075 | 78,131,103 | 123,497,029 | 123,558,660 | 123,519,170 | 123,601,141 | 123,601,141 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As of September 30,
|
||||||||
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
2011
|
2011 (2)
|
||||||
|
(in thousands NIS)
|
(in thousands U.S.$)
|
|||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
33,895 | 9,131 | ||||||
| Short-term bank deposits | 78,564 | 21,165 | ||||||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
4,076 | 1,098 | ||||||
|
Total assets
|
123,739 | 33,334 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
25,020 | 6,739 | ||||||
|
Total shareholders’ equity (capital deficiency)
|
98,719 | 26,595 | ||||||
|
(1)
|
Data on diluted loss per share was not presented in the financial statements because the effect of the exercise of the options is either immaterial or is anti-dilutive.
|
|
(2)
|
Calculated using the exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel for September 30, 2011 at the rate of one U.S. dollar per NIS 3.712.
|
|
(3)
|
The net loss per share has been adjusted to reflect the benefit component related to the issuance of rights to investors in 2009.
|
You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this prospectus, particularly those in the “Risk Factors.”
U.S. dollar amounts herein (other than amounts that were originally receivable or payable in dollars) have been translated for the convenience of the reader from the original NIS amounts at the representative rate of exchange as of September 30, 2011 ($1 = NIS 3.712). The dollar amounts presented should not be construed as representing amounts that are receivable or payable in dollars or convertible into dollars, unless otherwise indicated.
We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical development company dedicated to identifying, in-licensing and developing therapeutic candidates that have advantages over currently available therapies or address unmet medical needs. Our current development pipeline consists of five clinical therapeutic candidates, BL-1020, BL-1021, BL-1040, BL-5010 and BL-7040. In addition, we have 13 therapeutic candidates in preclinical development. We generate our pipeline by systematically identifying, rigorously validating and in-licensing therapeutic candidates that we believe exhibit a relatively high probability of therapeutic and commercial success. We also operate, with substantial financial support of the OCS, a biotechnology incubator to evaluate therapeutic candidates. As of September 30, 2011, we have received approximately NIS 47.9 million ($12.9) million in grants in the form of loans from the OCS to operate the incubator, which does not include NIS 21.6 million ($5.8 million) we have received from the OCS outside of the incubator agreement, as of that date. Such amounts include loans equal to approximately NIS 32.9 million ($8.9 million) for terminated programs. We are not required to repay loans for terminated programs. Our strategy includes commercializing our therapeutic candidates through out-licensing arrangements with biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies and evaluating, on a case by case basis, the commercialization of our therapeutic candidates independently.
The following is a description of our five clinical therapeutic candidates:
|
|
•
|
BL-1020 is an orally available drug in development for the treatment of schizophrenia. In September 2009, we announced positive topline results from a phase 2b clinical trial of BL-1020. In June 2011, we commenced the CLARITY trial of BL-1020, which is currently being carried out at 14 clinical sites in Romania and 18 additional sites in India..
|
|
|
•
|
BL-1040 is a novel resorbable polymer solution for use in the prevention of cardiac remodeling that may occur in patients who have suffered an AMI. BL-1040 is being developed as a medical device. In March 2010, we announced positive results from a phase 1/2 clinical trial. We have entered into an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing out-licensing arrangement with Ikaria with respect to the development, manufacture and commercialization of BL-1040. In December 2011, Ikaria commenced PRESERVATION 1, a CE Mark registration clinical trial of BL-1040 (now called by Ikaria “Bioabsorbable Cardiac Matrix,” or BCM).
|
|
|
•
|
BL-5010 is a novel therapeutic candidate for the non-surgical removal of skin lesions. In December 2010, we announced positive results from a phase 1/2 clinical trial of BL-5010. BL-5010 recently received European confirmation from the British Standards Institution Notified Body (BSI) in the UK, of the regulatory pathway classification as a Class IIa medical device. We are currently evaluating the most advantageous ways to progress with this therapeutic candidate from a regulatory, clinical and business perspective.
|
|
|
•
|
BL-1021 is a new chemical entity in development for the treatment of neuropathic pain. We recently completed a phase 1a clinical trial to assess safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single administration of BL-1021 at doses between 10 mg and 80 mg in healthy volunteers. Study results demonstrated that a single administration of BL-1021 in the dose range examined was safe and well tolerated, with no significant changes noted in vital signs, ECG or laboratory safety parameters at any dose when compared either to baseline measurements or to the placebo group. In addition, preliminary modeling of the pharmacokinetic data collected in this trial predicts that a once daily administration of BL-1021 at the dose levels assessed will enable reaching effective doses in patients.
|
|
|
•
|
BL-7040 is a synthetic oligonucleotide which we intend to develop for the treatment of IBD. It is an orally-available, synthetic oligonucleotide with unique dual activity on both the nervous and immune systems. We anticipate commencing a phase 2 study to evaluate the effectiveness of BL-7040 for the treatment of IBD during 2012.
|
In July 2009, we entered into an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing licensing arrangement with Ikaria which was amended and restated in August 2009. Under the agreement, we granted Ikaria an exclusive, worldwide license to develop, manufacture and commercialize BL-1040 for use in the prevention, mitigation and treatment of injuries to the myocardial tissue of the heart. Under the arrangement, Ikaria is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to complete clinical development of, and to commercialize, BL-1040 or products related thereto. We received an upfront payment equal to $7.0 million upon the execution of the license agreement. Upon successful completion of the phase 1/2 clinical trial, Ikaria paid us a milestone payment equal to $10.0 million in April 2010 and we are entitled to receive additional milestone and royalty payments upon the occurrence of certain events.
In June 2010, we entered into an exclusive, royalty-bearing out-licensing arrangement with Cypress Bioscience with regard to BL-1020, covering the United States, Canada and Mexico, which became effective in August 2010. We received an upfront fee of $30.0 million from Cypress Bioscience upon the effectiveness of the agreement. In May 2011, following the acquisition of Cypress Bioscience by Royalty Pharma earlier in the year, we reacquired all of the rights to develop and commercialize BL-1020 from Cypress Bioscience and currently hold full global rights to the product. We are continuing to develop BL-1020, and commenced the phase 2/3 CLARITY trial in June 2011.
History of Losses
Since inception in 2003, we have generated significant losses in connection with our research and development, including the clinical development and phase 2b clinical trial of BL-1020. As of September 30, 2011, we had an accumulated deficit of NIS 353.9 million. Although we have begun to recognize revenues in connection with our out-licensing arrangement with Ikaria for BL-1040 and our former out-licensing arrangement with Cypress Bioscience for BL-1020, we may continue to generate losses in connection with the research and development activities relating to our pipeline of therapeutic candidates. Such research and development activities are budgeted to expand over time and will require further resources if we are to be successful. As a result, we may continue to incur operating losses, which may be substantial over the next several years, and we may need to obtain additional funds to further develop our research and development programs.
We have funded our operations primarily through the sale of equity securities (both in private placements and in three public offerings on the TASE), funding received from the OCS, payments received under the licensing arrangements with Ikaria and Cypress Bioscience, and interest earned on investments. We expect to continue to fund our operations over the next several years through our existing cash resources, potential future milestone payments that we expect to receive from Ikaria, interest earned on our investments and additional capital to be raised through public or private equity offerings or debt financings. As of September 30, 2011, we had approximately $30.3 million of cash, cash equivalents and short-term bank deposits based on the exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel as of September 30, 2011.
Revenues
Our revenues to date have been generated primarily from milestone payments under our licensing arrangements with Ikaria and the amounts we have received to date from Cypress Bioscience. We entered into a license and collaboration agreement with Ikaria in July 2009, which was amended and restated in August 2009. Ikaria subsequently paid us an up-front payment of $7.0 million. In addition, upon successful completion of the phase 1/2 clinical trial, Ikaria paid us a milestone payment of $10.0 million, which was subject to a 15% withholding tax in the United States. We received a full refund of the tax withheld from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service in the third quarter of 2011. In June 2010, we entered into a license agreement with Cypress Bioscience. Under the terms of the license agreement, we received an upfront fee of $30.0 million. The license agreement with Cypress Bioscience was terminated, effective as of May 31, 2011.
Under the terms of our agreement with Ikaria, in addition to the payments mentioned above, the maximum future development-related payments to which we are entitled is $115.5 million. We are also entitled to maximum commercialization milestone payments of $150.0 million, subject to the terms and conditions of the license agreement. Certain payments we may receive from Ikaria in the future, if at all, may be subject to a 15% withholding tax in the United States. Receipt of any milestone payment under the Ikaria agreement depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that we will receive any of these future payments. We believe that we may be entitled to a refund of withholding taxes paid in connection with future payments from the U.S. government but there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain such a refund. In addition, we may be able to use U.S. taxes withheld from future payments to us as credits against Israeli corporate income tax when we have income, if at all, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to realize the credits. Our payments to our in-licensors are to be made from the net consideration received from our out-licensees.
We expect our revenues for the next several years to be derived primarily from payments under our current agreement with Ikaria, as well as additional collaborations that we may enter into in the future, including with regard to BL-1020, BL-1021, BL-5010, BL-7040 or other therapeutic candidates. Furthermore, we may receive future royalties on product sales, if any, under our agreement with Ikaria, as well as under any future agreement relating to BL-1020, BL-1021, BL-5010, BL-7040 or other compounds.
Our remaining therapeutic candidates are currently in development and, therefore, we do not expect to generate any revenues from these products for at least the next several years, if at all.
Research and Development
Our research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel expenses, fees paid to external service providers, up-front and milestone payments under our license agreements, patent-related legal fees, costs of preclinical studies and clinical trials, drug and laboratory supplies and costs for facilities and equipment. We primarily use external service providers to manufacture our product candidates for clinical trials and for the majority of our preclinical and clinical development work. We charge all research and development expenses to operations as they are incurred. We expect our research and development expense to remain our primary expense in the near future as we continue to develop our therapeutic candidates.
The following table identifies our current major research and development projects:
|
Project
|
Status
|
Expected or Recent Near Term Milestone
|
||
|
BL-1020
|
Phase 2/3 CLARITY trial
|
CLARITY study results - H1 2013
|
||
|
BL-1040
|
CE registration pivotal trial
|
Study results - 2013
|
||
|
BL-5010
|
Completed phase 1/2
|
We are currently evaluating the most advantageous ways to progress with this therapeutic candidate from a clinical and business perspective.
|
||
|
BL-1021
|
Completed Phase 1a
|
Phase 1b multiple ascending dose study
|
||
|
BL-7040
|
Completed phase 1 and phase 2 for other indication
|
Phase 2 study to evaluate the effectiveness of BL-7040 for the treatment of IBD during 2012
|
In addition to the projects set forth above, we have 13 projects that are in the preclinical stages of development. Such projects have significantly lower costs due to their stage of development. See “Business — Therapeutic Candidates in Preclinical Development.”
We record costs for each development project on a “direct cost” basis only. Direct costs, which include contract research organization expenses, consulting expenses, patent expenses, materials, and other, similar expenses, are recorded to the project for which such expenses are incurred. However, salary and overhead costs, including, but not limited to salary expenses (including salaries for research and development personnel), facilities, depreciation, and stock-based compensation, are considered overhead, and are shared among all of our projects and are not recorded on a project-by-project basis. We do not allocate direct salaries to projects due to the fact that our project managers are generally involved in several projects at different stages of development, and the related salary expense is not significant to the overall cost of the applicable projects. In addition, indirect labor costs relating to our departments that support the research and development process, such as chemistry, manufacturing and controls (CMC), pre-clinical analysis, laboratory testing and initial drug sample production, as well as rent and other administrative overhead costs, are shared by many different projects and have never been considered by management to be of significance in its decision-making process with respect to any specific project. Accordingly, such costs have not been specifically allocated to individual projects. Set forth below is a summary of the gross direct costs allocated to our main projects on an individual basis, as well as the gross direct costs allocated to our less significant projects on an aggregate basis, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010; for the nine months ended September 30, 2011; and on an aggregate basis since project inception.
Certain of such costs are covered by OCS funding, although OCS funds received have not been deducted from the direct project costs in the table.
|
(1)
|
Does not include indirect project costs and overhead, including payroll and related expenses (including stock-based compensation), facilities, depreciation and impairment of intellectual property, which are included in total research and development expenses in our financial statements.
|
As indicated in the table above, a significant portion of our research and development costs have been incurred in connection with the BL-1020 project. We expect to continue to incur significant additional costs on the BL-1020 project through 2013, as a result of the phase 2/3 CLARITY study that we are currently conducting.
The costs and expenses of our projects are partially funded by grants we have received from the OCS. Each grant is deducted from the related research and development expenses as the costs are incurred. For additional information regarding the grant process, see “Government Regulation and Funding — Israeli Government Programs.” There can be no assurance that we will continue to receive grants from the OCS in amounts sufficient to fund our operations, if at all. In addition, under our licensing agreement with Ikaria, Ikaria is responsible for the costs associated with conducting all development activities for BL-1040, other than the costs associated with the phase 1/2 study. See “Business — Out-Licensing Agreement with Ikaria Holdings” and “Business — Out-Licensing Agreement with Cypress Bioscience.”
From our inception through September 30, 2011, we have incurred research and development expense of approximately NIS 437.2 million
($117.8 million). We expect that a large percentage of our research and development expense in the future will be incurred in support of our current and future preclinical and clinical development projects. Due to the inherently unpredictable nature of preclinical and clinical development processes and given the early stage of our preclinical product development projects, we are unable to estimate with any certainty the costs we will incur in the continued development of the therapeutic candidates in our pipeline for potential commercialization. Clinical development timelines, the probability of success and development costs can differ materially from expectations. We expect to continue to test our product candidates in preclinical studies for toxicology, safety and efficacy, and to conduct additional clinical trials for each product candidate. If we are not able to enter into an out-licensing arrangement with respect to any therapeutic candidate prior to the commencement of later stage clinical trials, we may fund the trials for the therapeutic candidate ourselves.
While we are currently focused on advancing each of our product development projects, our future research and development expenses will depend on the clinical success of each therapeutic candidate, as well as ongoing assessments of each therapeutic candidate’s commercial potential. In addition, we cannot forecast with any degree of certainty which therapeutic candidates may be subject to future out-licensing arrangements, when such out-licensing arrangements will be secured, if at all, and to what degree such arrangements would affect our development plans and capital requirements. See “Risk Factors — If we or our licensees are unable to obtain U.S. and/or foreign regulatory approval for our therapeutic candidates, we will be unable to commercialize our therapeutic candidates.”
As we obtain results from clinical trials, we may elect to discontinue or delay clinical trials for certain therapeutic candidates or projects in order to focus our resources on more promising therapeutic candidates or projects. Completion of clinical trials by us or our licensees may take several years or more, but the length of time generally varies according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of a therapeutic candidate.
The cost of clinical trials may vary significantly over the life of a project as a result of differences arising during clinical development, including, among others:
|
|
•
|
the number of sites included in the clinical trials;
|
|
|
•
|
the length of time required to enroll suitable patients;
|
|
|
•
|
the number of patients that participate in the clinical trials;
|
|
|
•
|
the duration of patient follow-up;
|
|
|
•
|
whether the patients require hospitalization or can be treated on an out-patient basis;
|
|
|
•
|
the development stage of the therapeutic candidate; and
|
|
|
•
|
the efficacy and safety profile of the therapeutic candidate.
|
We expect our research and development expenses to increase in the future from current levels as we continue the advancement of our clinical trials and preclinical product development projects and place significant emphasis on in-licensing new product candidates. The lengthy process of completing clinical trials and seeking regulatory approval for our product candidates requires expenditure of substantial resources. Any failure or delay in completing clinical trials, or in obtaining regulatory approvals, could cause a delay in generating product revenue and cause our research and development expenses to increase and, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our operations. Due to the factors set forth above, we are not able to estimate with any certainty when we would recognize any net cash inflows from our projects.
Sales and Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation for employees in business development and marketing functions. Other significant sales and marketing costs include costs for marketing and communication materials, professional fees for outside market research and consulting, legal services related to partnering transactions and travel costs.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation for employees in executive and operational functions, including accounting, finance, legal, investor relations, information technology and human resources. Other significant general and administration costs include facilities costs, professional fees for outside accounting and legal services, travel costs, insurance premiums and depreciation.
Financial Expense and Income
Financial expense and income consists of interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents and short-term bank deposits; bank fees and other transactional costs; and expense or income resulting from fluctuations of the dollar and other currencies, in which a portion of our assets and liabilities are denominated, against the NIS (our functional currency).
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We describe our significant accounting policies more fully in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010. We believe that the accounting policies below are critical for one to fully understand and evaluate our financial condition and results of operations.
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our financial statements, which we prepare in accordance with IFRS. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate such estimates and judgments, including those described in greater detail below. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Functional Currency
The currency of the primary economic environment in which our operations are conducted is the NIS. As we have not recorded significant recurring revenues since our inception, we consider the currency of the primary economic environment to be the currency in which we expend cash. A significant portion of our expenses and capital expenditures are incurred in NIS, and almost all of our financing has been provided in NIS.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenues in accordance with International Accounting Standard No. 18, or IAS 18. Under IAS 18, revenues incurred in connection with the out-licensing of our patents and other intellectual property are recognized when all of the following criteria have been met as of the applicable balance sheet date:
|
|
•
|
we have transferred to the licensee the significant risks and rewards of the rights to the patents and intellectual property;
|
|
|
•
|
we do not retain either the continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually associated with ownership or the effective control over the patents and intellectual property;
|
|
|
•
|
we can reliably measure the amount of revenue to be recognized;
|
|
|
•
|
it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to us; and
|
|
|
•
|
we can reliably measure the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the out-licensing.
|
We recognize revenues incurred in connection with the rendering of services by reference to the stage of completion of the transaction at the balance sheet date, if and when the outcome of the transaction can be estimated reliably.
We recognize revenues from royalties on an accrual basis when they become probable in accordance with the substance of the relevant agreement.
Accrued Expenses
We are required to estimate accrued expenses as part of our process of preparing financial statements. This process involves estimating the level of service performed on our behalf and the associated cost incurred in instances where we have not been invoiced or otherwise notified of actual costs. Examples of areas in which subjective judgments may be required include costs associated with services provided by contract organizations for preclinical development, clinical trials and manufacturing of clinical materials. We account for expenses associated with these external services by determining the total cost of a given study based on the terms of the related contract. We accrue for costs incurred as the services are being provided by monitoring the status of the trials and the invoices received from our external service providers. In the case of clinical trials, the estimated cost normally relates to the projected costs of treating the patients in our trials, which we recognize over the estimated term of the trial according to the number of patients enrolled in the trial on an ongoing basis, beginning with patient enrollment. As actual costs become known to us, we adjust our accruals.
Investments in Financial Assets
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing the income that we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk and loss. Our investments are exposed to market risk due to fluctuations in interest rates, which may affect our interest income and the fair market value of our investments. We manage this exposure by performing ongoing evaluations of our investments. Due to the short-term maturities of our investments to date, their carrying value has always approximated their fair value.
A financial asset is classified in this category if our management has designated it as a financial asset upon initial recognition, because it is managed and its performance is evaluated on a fair-value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy. Our investment policy with regard to excess cash, as adopted by our Board of Directors, is composed of the following objectives: (i) preserving investment principal; (ii) providing liquidity; and (iii) providing optimum yields pursuant to the policy guidelines and market conditions. The policy provides detailed guidelines as to the securities and other financial instruments in which we are allowed to invest. In addition, in order to maintain liquidity, investments are structured to provide flexibility to liquidate at least 50% of all investments within 15 business days. Information about these assets, including details of the portfolio and income earned, is provided internally on a quarterly basis to our key management personnel. Any divergence from this investment policy requires approval from our Board of Directors.
Government Participation in Research and Development Expenses
We receive research and development funding from the State of Israel through the OCS, both in the form of loans extended to our biotechnology incubator, as well as in the form of grants. In accordance with the OCS programs, we are entitled to a specific grant or loan with respect to a development project only after we incur development costs related to the project. Such loans and grants qualify as “forgivable loans” in accordance with IAS 20, “Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance,” since they are repayable only if we generate revenues related to the underlying project.
In accordance with IAS 20, we account for each forgivable loan as a liability unless it is more likely than not that we will meet the terms of forgiveness of the loan, in which case the forgivable loan is accounted for as a government grant and carried to income as a reduction of the research and development expenses. Upon the initiation of any project for which we have received a loan, we consider it more likely than not that the project will not reach the revenue-generating stage during the entire development phase of the project when determining the accounting treatment of the related loan. Our determination is based on the high risk nature of pharmaceutical development generally and specifically on our strategy of initializing projects in the earliest stages of development. Therefore, we record a liability in respect of forgivable loans on a project only when it becomes probable that we will repay the loan.
Liabilities to the OCS in respect of out-licensing transactions are generally discussed and negotiated with the OCS, due to the fact that such licensing transactions do not fit into the standard development funding model contemplated by the Israeli Research and Development Law. In June 2010, we received a notification regarding the payment due in connection with the BL-1040 project, which we have paid in full. Accordingly, we have no further liabilities to the OCS with respect to BL-1040. We have accrued a liability of $1.6 million to the OCS in connection with the BL-1020 out-licensing transaction ($3.0 million was paid in August 2010), representing the full amount of the grants received from the OCS in respect of the BL-1020 project. This represents our best estimate of the liability to the OCS related to BL-1020. We may incur additional liabilities to the OCS, depending on the portion of total manufacturing that is performed outside of Israel in respect of BL-1020. Such liabilities will only accrue, if at all, with respect to any payment received in connection with BL-1020, when we determine that it is more likely than not that the payment will become payable.
Stock-based Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of IFRS 2. IFRS 2 requires companies to recognize stock compensation expense for awards of equity instruments based on grant-date fair value of those awards (with limited exceptions). The cost is recognized as compensation expense over the life of the instruments, based upon the grant-date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The fair value of our option grants is computed as of the grant date based on the Black-Scholes model, using the standard parameters established in that model including estimates relating to volatility of our stock, risk-free interest rates, estimated life of the equity instruments issued and the market price of our stock. As our stock is publicly traded on the TASE, we do not need to estimate the fair market value of our shares. Rather, we use the actual closing market price of our ordinary shares on the date of grant, as reported by the TASE.
Warrants
We issued Series 1 Warrants in connection with our Israeli initial public offering in February 2007. In accordance with IFRS, we allocated a portion of the consideration received to the warrants based on their fair value at the time. The consideration allocated to warrants is generally reflected in shareholders’ equity, except in cases in which the exercise price of the warrants is not fixed. Due to the fact that the exercise price of the warrants we issued was linked to the Israeli consumer price index, the warrants were reflected as a financial liability and changes in the market value of the warrants were recorded in our statement of operations. Effective July 2008, the linkage to the Israeli consumer price index was no longer applicable, and such warrants were reclassified to shareholders’ equity at their then current fair value. Subsequent changes in the market value of those warrants have no longer been reflected in our financial statements effective as of such date. In December 2009, we issued Series 2 Warrants exercisable for 7,528,946 ordinary shares. The Series 2 Warrants had a fixed exercise price and were classified as shareholders’ equity. All Series 2 warrants expired on December 29, 2011 without exercise.
In connection with our private placement of approximately 5.25 million of our ADSs on February 22, 2012, we issued warrants to purchase approximately 2.6 million of our ADSs for an exercise price of $3.57, subject to typical adjustments. The warrants are exercisable for a period of five years from the date of issuance.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The recent accounting pronouncements set forth below became effective in 2010. None of the accounting pronouncements had a material adverse effect on our financial statements.
IAS 27 (revised) requires the effects of all transactions with non-controlling interests to be recorded in equity if there is no change in control and these transactions will no longer result in goodwill or gains and losses. The standard also specifies the accounting when control is lost. Any remaining interest in the entity is re-measured to fair value, and a gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss. We did not carry out any transactions with non-controlling interests during 2010 and, accordingly, the initial adoption of IAS 27 (revised) did not have any impact on the Group’s financial statements.
IFRS 3 (revised), “Business Combinations” is effective prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after 1 July 2009. The revised standard continues to apply the acquisition method to business combinations but with some significant changes compared with IFRS 3. For example, all payments to purchase a business are recorded at fair value at the acquisition date, with contingent payments classified as debt subsequently remeasured through the statement of comprehensive income. There is a choice on an acquisition-by-acquisition basis to measure the non-controlling interest in the acquiree either at fair value or at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the acquiree’s net assets. All acquisition-related costs are expensed. We elected to adopt IFRS 3 (revised) on a prospective basis for all business combinations, effective January 1, 2010. The initial adoption of IFRS 3 (revised) did not have an effect on our financial statements.
IFRS 2 (amendment), “Share-Based Payment,” was adopted by our company effective January 1, 2009. This amendment deals with vesting conditions and cancellations. It clarifies that vesting conditions are service conditions and performance conditions only. Other features of a share-based payment are not vesting conditions. Such features would need to be included in the grant date fair value for transactions with employees and others providing similar services; they would not impact the number of awards expected to vest or valuation thereof subsequent to grant date. All cancellations, whether by the entity or by other parties, should receive the same accounting treatment in the financial statements. The amendment did not have a material impact on our financial statements for the periods reported herein.
IAS 1 (amendment), “Presentation of Financial Statements.” The amendment clarifies that the potential settlement of a liability by the issue of equity is not relevant to its classification as current or non-current. By amending the definition of current liability, the amendment permits a liability to be classified as non-current (provided that the entity has an unconditional right to defer settlement by transfer of cash or other assets for at least 12 months after the accounting period) notwithstanding the fact that the entity could be required by the counterparty to settle in shares at any time. We adopted IAS 1 (amendment) effective January 1, 2010. The initial adoption of IAS 1 (amendment) did not have an effect on our financial statements.
IFRS 7 “Financial Instruments — Disclosures” (amendment), requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurement and liquidity risk. In particular, the amendment requires disclosure of fair value measurements in accordance with a fair value measurement hierarchy. The amendment did not have a material impact on our financial statements for the periods reported herein.
IAS 38 (amendment), “Intangible Assets,” which is part of the IASB’s annual improvements project published in May 2008. The amendment stipulates that a prepayment may only be recognized in the event that payment has been made in advance of obtaining the right of access to goods or receipt of services. The amendment also establishes that when re-measuring the book value of a debt instrument at termination of fair value hedge accounting, the effective interest calculated as of the date hedge accounting terminates should be used. The amendment did not have a material impact on our financial statements for the periods reported herein.
The standards and amendments to existing standards set forth below have been published and are mandatory for accounting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2011 or later periods, and may be adopted early. We have not elected to adopt the standards and amendments to existing standards early.
IAS 32 (amendment), “Classification of Rights Issues,” was issued in October 2009. For rights issues offered for a fixed amount of foreign currency, current practice appears to require such issues to be accounted for as derivative liabilities. The amendment states that if such rights are issued pro rata to all existing shareholders of an entity in the same class for a fixed amount of currency, they should be classified as equity regardless of the currency in which the exercise price is denominated. The amendment will be effective for annual periods beginning on or after February 1, 2010, with early application permissible. We have applied this amendment in our financial statements since January 1, 2011.
Results of Operations -- Overview
Revenues
In August 2010, we received a payment of $30.0 million in connection with our out-licensing arrangement with Cypress Bioscience, which was recorded as revenue in the third quarter of 2010. We did not record any revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Cost of revenues
Cost of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 consists of payments due to the licensors under the in-licensing agreement related to BL-1020. We did not record any cost of revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Research and development expenses
At December 31, 2009, our drug development pipeline consisted of 12 therapeutic candidates. We added four new compounds to our pipeline, and discontinued the development of six compounds from the pipeline, during the year ended December 31, 2010, so that our pipeline consisted of 10 therapeutic candidates at December 31, 2010. We added five new compounds to our pipeline, and discontinued the development of one compound from the pipeline, during the first nine months of 2011, and our drug development pipeline as of September 30, 2011 consisted as 14 therapeutic candidates.
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September, 2011 to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
Sales and marketing expenses
Sales and marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were NIS 2.4 million ($0.7 million), a decrease of NIS 1.1 million ($0.2 million), or 31%, compared to NIS 3.5 ($0.9 million) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease resulted primarily from our not continuing the strategic partnering efforts in connection with BL-1020 that were made during 2010 as well as from a reduction in expenses due to the transfer of our business development activities from the U.S. to Israel during the first half of 2011 and the resulting closure of our U.S. office. Sales and marketing expenses are expected to increase in the foreseeable future, as we continue to increase our business development efforts in respect of BL-1020, as well as some of our other clinical stage assets.
Research and development expenses
Research and development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were NIS 30.0 million ($8.1 million), a decrease of NIS 13.8 million ($3.7 million), or 31%, compared to NIS 43.8 million ($11.8 million) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Research and development expenses for the 2010 period included payments to the OCS of NIS 17.4 million ($4.7 million) which were a repayment of funds previously received from the OCS in respect of BL-1020. Those funds had been previously reflected in prior periods as a reduction in research and development expenses. Without regard to these non-recurring payments, research and development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased by NIS 3.7 million ($1.0 million), or 14%, over the comparable 2010 period. The increase resulted primarily from the commencement of the CLARITY clinical trial in respect of BL-1020 at the end of June 2011.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were NIS 9.5 million ($2.6 million), an increase of NIS 0.6 million ($0.2 million), or 7%, compared to NIS 8.9 million ($2.4 million) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase resulted primarily from professional fees relating to the listing of our ADSs on NASDAQ in July 2011.
Financial income (expense), net
We recognized net financial income of NIS 6.0 million ($1.6 million) for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of NIS 7.9 million ($2.1 million), compared to net financial expense of NIS 1.9 ($0.5 million) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in net financial income resulted primarily from the increase in the average exchange rate of foreign currencies in relation to the NIS during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, which had a positive effect on our net assets denominated in such foreign currencies during that period.
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2010 to the Year Ended December 31, 2009
Sales and marketing expenses
Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 were NIS 4.6 million, an increase of NIS 1.5 million, or 48%, compared to NIS 3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase resulted primarily from the strategic partnering efforts in connection with BL-1020 during the first quarter of 2010 compared to less significant costs in connection with BL-1040 during 2009.
Research and development expenses
Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 were NIS 55.0 million, a decrease of NIS 35.3 million, or 39%, compared to NIS 90.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease resulted primarily from decreased costs due to the completion of the BL-1020 and BL-1040 clinical trials at the end of 2009 and the reduced introduction of new projects during 2009 and the first half of 2010.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses were NIS 14.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of NIS 3.7 million, or 33%, compared to NIS 11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in general and administrative expenses resulted primarily from expenses associated with our proposed initial public offering as well as an increase in consultancy fees during 2010.
Financial expense, net
We recognized net financial expense of NIS 5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of NIS 7.5 million, or 20%, compared to net financial income of NIS 1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in net financial income resulted primarily from the decrease in the average exchange rate of foreign currencies in relation to the NIS during 2010, which had a negative effect on our net assets denominated in such foreign currencies during the year ended December 31, 2010.
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2009 to the Year Ended December 31, 2008
Research and development expenses
Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 were NIS 90.3 million, a decrease of NIS 15.9 million, or 15.0%, compared to NIS 106.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease resulted primarily from decreased costs relating to the BL-1020 and BL-1040 clinical trials, reduced spending on other projects and the cessation of new project introductions during 2009 in connection with the spending reduction plan we instituted at the beginning of 2009 to conserve our cash resources and focus on the completion of our BL-1020 and BL-1040 clinical trials. In addition, our research and development costs were reduced in connection with the reduction of research and personnel from 45 employees as of December 31, 2008, to 33 employees as of December 31, 2009.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses were NIS 11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of NIS 1.9 million, or 14.5%, compared to NIS 13.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in general and administrative expenses resulted primarily from cost reductions instituted at the beginning of 2009, as well as a decrease in share-based compensation expense compared with the year ended December 31, 2008.
Financial income, net
We recognized net financial income of NIS 1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of NIS 1.1 million, or 157.0%, compared to net financial income of NIS 0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase in net financial income resulted primarily from the increase in the average exchange rate of foreign currencies in relation to the NIS during 2009, which had a positive effect on our net assets denominated in such foreign currencies during the year ended December 31, 2009.
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following tables show our unaudited quarterly statements of operations for the periods indicated. We have prepared this quarterly information on a basis consistent with our audited consolidated financial statements and we believe it includes all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the information shown. Operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for a full fiscal year.
|
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
March 31
|
June 30
|
Sept. 30
|
Dec. 31
|
March 31
|
June 30
|
Sept. 30
|
Dec. 31
|
March 31
|
June 30
|
Sept. 30
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands NIS)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated statements of Operations
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
26,138 | 37,771 | 113,160 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cost of revenues
|
(7,340 | ) | (15,282 | ) | (25,571 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
(423 | ) | (1,045 | ) | (329 | ) | (3,085 | ) | (959 | ) | (1,225 | ) | (1,322 | ) | (1,103 | ) | (750 | ) | (1,323 | ) | (358 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Research and development expenses, net
|
(26,486 | ) | (23,364 | ) | (32,636 | ) | (7,816 | ) | (10,736 | ) | (26,296 | ) | (6,737 | ) | (11,197 | ) | (6,384 | ) | (10,405 | ) | (13,255 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
(2,545 | ) | (1,771 | ) | (2,932 | ) | (2,137 | ) | (2,935 | ) | (3,289 | ) | (2,690 | ) | (5,961 | ) | (2,926 | ) | (3,348 | ) | (3,272 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
(29,454 | ) | (26,180 | ) | (17,099 | ) | 9,451 | (14,630 | ) | (30,810 | ) | 76,840 | (18,261 | ) | (10,060 | ) | (15,076 | ) | (16,855 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Financial income, net
|
3,790 | 9 | 63 | 66 | 193 | 2,685 | 178 | – | 1,183 | 637 | 8,965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Financial expenses, net
|
(29 | ) | (1,710 | ) | (181 | ) | (244 | ) | (1,038 | ) | (24 | ) | (3,869 | ) | (3,824 | ) | (2,767 | ) | (1,965 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net profit (loss)
|
(25,693 | ) | (27,881 | ) | (17,217 | ) | 9,273 | (15,475 | ) | (28,149 | ) | 73,149 | (22,085 | ) | (11,644 | ) | (16,404 | ) | (7,938 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Our quarterly revenues and operating results of operations have varied in the past and can be expected to vary in the future due to numerous factors. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indications of future performance.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since inception, we have funded our operations primarily through public (in Israel) and private offerings of our equity securities, grants and loans from the OCS, and payments received under our strategic licensing arrangements. At September 30, 2011, we held approximately NIS 112.5 million ($30.3 million) in cash, cash equivalents and short-term bank deposits, and have invested substantially all of our available cash funds in short-term bank deposits.
On February 23, 2012, the Company completed a private placement to healthcare-focused U.S. institutional investors and issued an aggregate of 5,244,301 ADS, at a purchase price of $2.86 per ADS, and warrants to purchase up to 2,622,157 additional ADSs, at an exercise price of $3.57 per ADS. The offering raised a total of approximately $15 million, with net proceeds of approximately $14.1 million, after deducting fees and expenses.
Net cash provided by operating activities was NIS 40.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with cash used in operating activities of NIS 84.5 million and NIS 93.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The NIS 125.2 million increase in net cash provided by operating activities during 2010, compared to 2009, was primarily the result of the upfront payment we received in 2010 from Cypress Bioscience, as well as the reduction in research and development expenses in 2010.
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 was NIS 29.5 million, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of NIS 30.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and net cash used in investing activities of NIS 33.3 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The changes in cash flows from investing activities relate primarily to investments in, and maturities of, short-term bank deposits and other investments.
Net cash provided by financing activities amounted to NIS 0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, relating to the proceeds of a bank loan used for the acquisition of laboratory equipment. Net cash provided by financing activities of NIS 97.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 reflects the two public offerings of equity securities which we carried out in 2009.
Developing drugs, conducting clinical trials and commercializing products is expensive and we will need to raise substantial additional funds to achieve our strategic objectives. Although we believe our existing cash resources will be sufficient to fund our projected cash requirements through the second quarter of 2014, we will require significant additional financing in the future to fund our operations. Additional financing may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
|
|
•
|
the progress and costs of our preclinical studies, clinical trials and other research and development activities;
|
|
|
•
|
the scope, prioritization and number of our clinical trials and other research and development programs;
|
|
|
•
|
the amount of revenues we receive under our collaboration or licensing arrangements;
|
|
|
•
|
the costs of the development and expansion of our operational infrastructure;
|
|
|
•
|
the costs and timing of obtaining regulatory approval of our therapeutic candidates;
|
|
|
•
|
the ability of our collaborators to achieve development milestones, marketing approval and other events or developments under our collaboration agreements;
|
|
|
•
|
the costs of filing, prosecuting, enforcing and defending patent claims and other intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
•
|
the costs and timing of securing manufacturing arrangements for clinical or commercial production;
|
|
|
•
|
the costs of establishing sales and marketing capabilities or contracting with third parties to provide these capabilities for us;
|
|
|
•
|
the costs of acquiring or undertaking development and commercialization efforts for any future product candidates;
|
|
|
•
|
the magnitude of our general and administrative expenses;
|
|
|
•
|
any cost that we may incur under current and future licensing arrangements relating to our therapeutic candidates; and
|
|
|
•
|
payments to the OCS.
|
Until we can generate significant continuing revenues, we expect to satisfy our future cash needs through payments received under our collaborations, debt or equity financings, or by out-licensing other product candidates. We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.
If funds are not available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our research or development programs or our commercialization efforts.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Since inception, we have not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities whereby we have financial guarantees, subordinated retained interests, derivative instruments or other contingent arrangements that expose us to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities, or any other obligations under a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides us with financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations at September 30, 2011:
|
Total
|
Less than
1 year
|
1 – 3 years
|
3 – 5 years
|
More than
5 years
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(in NIS)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Car leasing obligations
|
2,232,000 | 1,104,000 | 1,128,000 | – | – | |||||||||||||||
|
Premises leasing obligations
|
1,073,000 | 874,000 | 199,000 | – | – | |||||||||||||||
|
Purchase commitments
|
5,468,000 | 5,468,000 | – | – | – | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
8,773,000 | 7,446,000 | 1,327,000 | – | – | |||||||||||||||
The foregoing table does not include our in-licensing agreements. Under our in-licensing agreements, we are obligated to make certain payments to our licensors upon the achievement of agreed upon milestones. We are unable at this time to estimate the actual amount or timing of the costs we will incur in the future under these agreements; however, we do not expect any of the milestones to be achieved within the next 12 months. If all of the milestones are achieved over the life of each in-licensing agreement, we will be required to pay approximately $16.3 million, in the aggregate, to the applicable licensors. Some of the in-licensing agreements are accompanied by consulting, support and cooperation agreements, pursuant to which we are required to pay the licensors a fixed monthly amount, over a period stipulated in the applicable agreement, for their assistance in the continued research and development under the applicable license. All of our in-licensing agreements are terminable at-will by us upon prior written notice of 30 to 60 days. We are unable at this time to estimate the actual amount or timing of the costs we will incur in the future under these agreements. See “Business — In-Licensing Agreements.”
Overview
We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical development company dedicated to identifying, in-licensing and developing therapeutic candidates that have advantages over currently available therapies or that address unmet medical needs. Our current development pipeline consists of five clinical-stage therapeutic candidates: BL-1020, an orally available drug that we believe may be the first antipsychotic therapeutic to improve cognitive function in schizophrenia patients; BL-1021, a new chemical entity in development for the treatment of neuropathic pain, or pain that results from damage to nerve fibers; BL-1040, a novel polymer solution for use in the prevention of cardiac remodeling following an AMI; BL-5010, a novel formulation for the non-surgical removal of skin lesions; and BL-7040, an oligonucleotide for the treatment of IBD. In addition, we have 13 therapeutic candidates in the preclinical stages of development. We generate our pipeline by systematically identifying, rigorously validating and in-licensing therapeutic candidates that we believe exhibit a relatively high probability of therapeutic and commercial success. None of our therapeutic candidates have been approved for marketing and, to date, there have been no commercial sales of any of our therapeutic candidates. Our strategy includes commercializing our therapeutic candidates through out-licensing arrangements with biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. We also evaluate, on a case by case basis, co-development and similar arrangements and the commercialization of our therapeutic candidates independently.
Our first lead therapeutic candidate, BL-1020, is in development for schizophrenia, a chronic, severe and disabling brain disorder that affects approximately 1.0% of the U.S. adult population as reported by the National Institute of Mental Health. Schizophrenia patients are typically treated with one of several commercially available antipsychotics, all of which are associated with side effects that reduce patient compliance and do not address the deterioration of cognitive function that affects the daily lives of schizophrenia patients. Despite these drawbacks, the three most commonly used antipsychotics, Risperdal, Zyprexa and Seroquel, reached aggregate sales of approximately $11.8 billion in the United States in 2010, based on the annual reports filed with the SEC or otherwise made publicly available by each of Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly and Company and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, the companies that market those drugs.
BL-1020 is an orally available drug that effectively reduces psychotic symptoms which we believe may also improve cognition. BL-1020 targets the imbalance of two key neurotransmitters implicated in schizophrenia, dopamine and gamma aminobutyric acid, or GABA. We believe that the reduction in psychotic symptoms is attributed to BL-1020’s dopamine antagonism and that BL-1020 may also improve cognition.
In our 363-patient phase 2b EAGLE (Effective Anti-psychosis via GABA Level Enhancement) study which was completed in July 2009, BL-1020 matched the antipsychotic efficacy of Risperdal, one of the leading approved antipsychotics, without evidence of the metabolic side effects associated with the use of atypical antipsychotics. Most significantly, BL-1020 demonstrated a clinically relevant and statistically significant improvement in cognition. Currently, there is no commercially available antipsychotic that improves cognitive function and this remains an important unmet medical need in the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychiatric and neurological diseases. In June 2011, we commenced a CLARITY clinical trial with respect to BL-1020. The CLARITY trial is designed to be a randomized, double-blind trial to examine acute (6 weeks) and long-term (24 weeks) antipsychotic and cognitive efficacy, safety and tolerability of BL-1020 on patients with acute schizophrenia. In May 2011, we received approval to commence the CLARITY trial at 14 trial sites in Romania. The initiation of the trial in Romania took place in May 2011 and the first patient was treated in June 2011. In November 2011 we received approval from the Indian regulatory authorities and the Indian local ethics committees to commence the trial at 18 additional clinical sites in India. We started recruitment in November 2011 and the first patient was treated in December 2011.
In June 2010, we entered into an exclusive, royalty-bearing out-licensing arrangement with Cypress Bioscience with regard to BL-1020, covering the United States, Canada and Mexico, which became effective in August 2010. We received an upfront fee of $30.0 million from Cypress Bioscience upon the effectiveness of the agreement. We are obligated to pay to Bar Ilan Research and Development and Ramot, collectively, a royalty payment equal to 22.5% of the net consideration we receive from the out-licensing of BL-1020. We paid Bar Ilan Research and Development and Ramot $6.75 million, in the aggregate, from the $30.0 million upfront fee. We also paid the OCS $3.0 million as partial repayment of grants previously received for the BL-1020 development program. See “Business — In-Licensing Agreements — BL-1020.”
In January 2011, Royalty Pharma acquired Cypress Bioscience. After the acquisition, we had a number of discussions with Cypress Bioscience and Royalty Pharma and they indicated to us that as a result of a change in their strategy, they believed it was in the best interest of BL-1020’s future commercial potential to consolidate the worldwide rights with our company. Cypress Bioscience expressed its desire that development of BL-1020 continue in a manner that both optimized Cypress Bioscience’s investment in BL-1020 and provided the best long-term commercialization potential. We believe that reacquiring BL-1020 was the best alternative at that time to ensure the timely development of BL-1020 and represents a significant opportunity for our company. Accordingly, on May 10, 2011, we entered into a rights reacquisition agreement with Cypress Bioscience. Under the terms and conditions of the rights reacquisition agreement, the out-license agreement terminated on May 31, 2011, and we reacquired all of the rights to develop and commercialize BL-1020. In consideration for the reacquisition of the rights, we agreed to pay Cypress Bioscience a royalty equal to 1% of the future net sales of BL-1020, if any, by us, our affiliates or our sublicensees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the aggregate royalty payment shall not exceed $80.0 million. In addition, we agreed to pay Cypress Bioscience $10.0 million payable solely from amounts we receive, if any, pursuant to future agreements relating to the further development or commercialization of a product containing BL-1020, either alone or with other therapeutically active ingredients. In connection with the payment, we are required to pay Cypress Bioscience 10% of all payments under any such agreement but in any event, not more than $10.0 million. If any such agreement requires that we incur the costs of certain proposed clinical trials of BL-1020, the payment schedule will be subject to certain deferrals. We have no other outstanding material obligations to Cypress Bioscience under the original out-license agreement, other than standard indemnification obligations.
Our second lead therapeutic candidate, BL-1040, is a novel resorbable polymer solution for use in the prevention of cardiac remodeling in patients who suffered an AMI. Preventing cardiac remodeling following an AMI may prevent transition to congestive heart failure and/or improve patient survival over the long term. Following an AMI, BL-1040 is administered via intracoronary injection. Upon contact with damaged cardiac tissue, the liquid BL-1040 transitions into a gel within the infarcted cardiac tissue and forms a “scaffold” that supports, retains the shape of, and enhances the mechanical strength of the heart muscle during the recovery and repair phases following an AMI. The data from our preclinical trials indicate that, by supporting the damaged heart tissue, BL-1040 preserves the normal functioning of the heart and the data from our clinical trials indicate that BL-1040 should be safe. After consultation by Ikaria with the FDA, BL-1040 is being developed as a class III medical device under the FDA’s pre-marketing approval, or PMA, regulatory pathway. In December 2011, Ikaria commenced PRESERVATION 1, a CE Mark registration clinical trial of BL-1040 (BCM). PRESERVATION 1 aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of BL-1040 (BCM) for prevention of ventricular remodeling and congestive heart failure when administered following AMI. The trial is a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multi-country and multi-center trial including approximately 300 patients who currently are expected to be recruited across over 90 sites. The BCM device will be administered to subjects who had successful percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and they will then be monitored for six months.
In July 2009, we entered into an out-licensing arrangement with Ikaria with regard to BL-1040. The July 2009 agreement was amended and restated in August 2009, and, under the arrangement, Ikaria is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to complete clinical development of, and to commercialize, BL-1040 or a product related thereto. To date, we have received $17.0 million from Ikaria, and we are entitled to receive up to an additional $265.5 million from Ikaria upon achievement of certain development, regulatory, and commercial milestones. In addition, we are entitled to receive from Ikaria royalties from net sales of any product developed under the arrangement. We are obligated to pay 28% of all net consideration received under this arrangement to B.G. Negev Technologies, the party from which we in-licensed BL-1020 in 2004. See “Business — In-Licensing Agreements — BL-1040.” We have agreed to pay Ramot a portion of the payments we make to B.G. Negev Technologies in connection with the in-license arrangement to satisfy contractual obligations between B.G. Negev Technologies and Ramot with respect to certain intellectual property rights to the licensed technology. We have also agreed to indemnify Ramot and certain of its related parties in connection with our use of the technology we in-licensed from B.G. Negev Technologies.
Our third clinical-stage therapeutic candidate, BL 5010, is a novel formulation composed of two acids being developed for the removal of skin lesions in a nonsurgical manner. These two acids have already been approved for use in cosmetics. If approved, BL-5010 would be a convenient alternative to invasive, painful and expensive removal treatments for skin lesions and may allow for histological examination. Because treatment with BL-5010 is non-invasive, we believe BL-5010 poses minimal infection risk, and requires no anesthesia or bandaging. In June 2009, we announced the initiation of a phase 1/2 clinical trial in 60 patients with seborrheic keratosis in Germany and the Netherlands to assess the safety and efficacy of BL-5010 in completely removing the lesion and to assess the cosmetic outcome of the novel treatment. In addition, the study was designed to assess the feasibility of preserving the cellular structure of skin lesions for subsequent histological exams. The study was completed in September 2010, and positive results were announced in December 2010. The results of the trial show that for 96.7% of patients, the treated lesion fell off within 30 days of a single application of BL-5010. The results also showed that BL-5010 has a good safety profile, as no persistent irreversible adverse effects were observed at the treated site. In addition, most of the investigators and patients who participated in the trial reported that they were very satisfied with the cosmetic outcome of the treatment (94.6% of the investigators and 84% of the patients stated that the results were good or excellent 180 days following treatment). None of the patients reported moderate or severe drug-related adverse events. Mild adverse events reported included skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (n=5, 8.3%) and general and administration site disorders (n=2, 3.3%). Pruritus was the only drug-related adverse event reported by more than two patients (n=4, 6.7%). In addition, histological examination of treated lesions indicate BL-5010’s efficacy in preserving the cellular structure of treated lesions.
BL-5010 recently received European confirmation from the British Standards Institution Notified Body (BSI) in the UK, of the regulatory pathway classification as a Class IIa medical device.
Our fourth clinical-stage therapeutic candidate, BL-1021, is a new chemical entity in development for the treatment of neuropathic pain, or pain that results from damage to nerve fibers. The efficacy of BL-1021 has been demonstrated in preclinical studies. BL-1021 showed significant reduction in symptoms of neuropathic pain with reduced side effects in animal models. The BL-1021 molecule was administered orally in such animal studies and was found to be superior to available treatments in efficacy and/or side effect measures. In December 2011, we completed a phase 1a clinical trial to assess safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single administration of BL-1021 at doses between 10mg and 80mg in healthy volunteers. This clinical trial was a single-site, double-blind, placebo controlled study, carried out at the Hadassah Clinical Research Center (HCRC) in Jerusalem, Israel. The study aimed at assessing the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single administration of BL-1021 (between 10 mg and 80 mg) in healthy male subjects. Study results demonstrated that a single administration of BL-1021 in the dose range examined was safe and well tolerated, with no significant changes noted in vital signs, ECG or laboratory safety parameters at any dose when compared either to baseline measurements or to the placebo group. In addition, preliminary modeling of the pharmacokinetic data collected in this trial predicts that a once daily administration of BL-1021 at the dose levels assessed will enable reaching effective doses in patients.
Our fifth clinical-stage therapeutic candidate, BL-7040, is a oligonucleotide polymer being developed for the treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). The compound has already been the subject of phase 1 safety and pharmacokinetics studies and a phase 2a study examining the efficacy of the compound for the treatment of Myasthenia Gravis, an autoimmune, neurodegenerative disease. BL-7040 showed a high level of efficacy in those trials. We intend to develop the compound for the treatment of IBD and other inflammatory diseases. We plan to enter a phase 2 study of BL-7040 to evaluate the effectiveness of BL-7040 for the treatment of IBD during 2012.
As part of our business strategy, we continue to actively source, rigorously evaluate and in-license selected therapeutic candidates. We establish and maintain close relationships with research institutes, academic institutions and biotechnology companies in Israel and, more recently, in other countries to identify and in-license therapeutic candidates. Before in-licensing, each therapeutic candidate must pass through our thorough screening process. Our Scientific Advisory Board and disease-specific third-party advisors are active in evaluating each therapeutic candidate. Our approach is consistent with our objective of proceeding only with therapeutic candidates that we believe exhibit a relatively high probability of therapeutic and commercial success. To date, we have screened over 1,500 compounds, presented more than 60 candidates to our Scientific Advisory Board for consideration, initiated development of 41 therapeutic candidates and terminated 23 feasibility programs.
Our Strategy
Our objective is to be a leader in developing innovative pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical products. We continuously identify and in-license therapeutic candidates in order to maximize our potential for commercial success. We repeatedly assess compounds by evaluating their efficacy, safety, technological novelty, patent status, market potential, and development and regulatory pathways. Our approach to evaluating, in-licensing and developing therapeutic candidates allows us to:
|
|
•
|
continually build our pipeline of therapeutic candidates;
|
|
|
•
|
advance those therapeutic candidates with the greatest potential;
|
|
|
•
|
quickly identify, and terminate the development of, unattractive therapeutic candidates; and
|
|
|
•
|
avoid dependency on a small number of therapeutic candidates.
|
Using this approach, we have successfully advanced five therapeutic candidates, BL-1020, BL-1040, BL-5010, BL-1021 and BL-7040, into clinical development. Specific elements of our current strategy include the following:
|
|
•
|
Facilitate the successful development and commercialization of BL-1040 by Ikaria.
We intend to assist our licensee, Ikaria, to develop and commercialize BL-1040. We are currently meeting with Ikaria on a quarterly basis to facilitate the transition of our BL-1040 assets to its organization and intend to lend our assistance and provide our expertise in their development and commercialization efforts as necessary.
|
|
|
•
|
Commercialize additional therapeutic candidates through out-licensing arrangements or, where appropriate, by ourselves.
We intend to commercialize many of our products through out-licensing arrangements with third parties who may perform any or all of the following tasks: completing development, securing regulatory approvals, manufacturing and/or marketing. If appropriate, we may enter into co-development and similar arrangements with respect to any therapeutic candidate with third parties or commercialize a therapeutic candidate ourselves.
|
|
|
•
|
Design development programs that reach critical decisions quickly.
At each step of our screening process for therapeutic candidates, a candidate is subjected to rigorous feasibility testing and potential advancement or termination. We believe our feasibility approach reduces costs and increases the probability of commercial success by eliminate less promising candidates quickly before advancing them into more costly preclinical and clinical programs.
|
|
|
•
|
Use our expertise and proprietary screening methodology to evaluate in-licensing opportunities.
In order to review and select among various candidates efficiently and effectively, we employ a rigorous screening system we developed. Our Scientific Advisory Board and disease-specific third-party advisors evaluate each candidate. We intend to in-license a sufficient number of therapeutic candidates to allow us to move a new therapeutic candidate into clinical development every 12 to 24 months.
|
|
|
•
|
Leverage and expand our relationships with research institutes, academic institutions and biotechnology companies, including the specific strategic relationships that we have developed with Israeli research and academic institutions, to identify and in-license promising therapeutic candidates.
To date, we have successfully in-licensed compounds from many major Israeli universities, as well as from many Israeli hospitals, technology incubators and biotechnology companies. We continue to maintain close contacts with university technology transfer offices, research and development authorities, university faculty, and many biotechnology companies to actively seek out early stage compounds. In addition, we actively source and evaluate non-Israeli compounds although we currently do not have any compound in our pipeline that was sourced outside of Israel.
|
Our Product Pipeline
The table below summarizes our current pipeline of therapeutic candidates, as well as the target indication and status of each candidate.
Lead Therapeutic Candidates
BL-1020
BL-1020 is an orally administered antipsychotic for the treatment of schizophrenia. We believe that BL-1020 will deliver antipsychotic effectiveness equal to, or exceeding, currently available treatments. Furthermore, we believe BL-1020 may be the first antipsychotic drug that improves cognitive function in schizophrenia patients. Based on our preclinical and clinical trials, we believe that BL-1020 works by blocking the dopamine receptors in the brain and activating the gamma aminobutyric acid, or GABA receptors. We believe that the dopamine antagonism in BL-1020 is responsible for reducing psychotic symptoms. The activation of GABA, or GABAergic activity, of the BL-1020 molecule may also be involved in improving patient cognition. In July 2009, we successfully completed our 363-patient phase 2b EAGLE (Effective Anti-psychosis via GABA Level Enhancement) study. We in-licensed the worldwide, exclusive rights to research, develop and commercialize BL-1020 from Bar Ilan Research and Development and Ramot.
In June 2011, we commenced the CLARITY clinical trial with respect to BL-1020. The CLARITY trial is designed to be a randomized, double-blind trial to examine both acute (6 weeks) and long-term (24 weeks) antipsychotic and cognitive efficacy, safety and tolerability of BL-1020 on patients with acute schizophrenia. In May 2011, we received approval to commence the CLARITY trial at 14 trial sites in Romania. The initiation of the trial in Romania took place in May 2011 and the first patient was treated in June 2011. In November 2011 we received approval from the Indian regulatory authorities and the Indian local ethics committees to commence the trial at 18 additional clinical sites in India. We started recruitment in November 2011 and the first patient was treated in December 2011.
Schizophrenia
. Schizophrenia is a chronic, severe, and disabling brain disorder that affects approximately 1% of the U.S. adult population as reported by the National Institute of Mental Health. IMS Health, a leading provider of market intelligence, reports that the market for antipsychotic drugs was less than $500 million in 1991 and increased to $5.0 billion in 2000. According to Datamonitor, a provider of business information to the pharmaceutical and other industries, the market for antipsychotic drugs in 2008 in the United States alone was $13.6 billion, with an additional $4.2 billion in aggregate sales in Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. Sales in these seven countries are projected by Datamonitor to stay stable, when aggregated, through 2018.
Schizophrenia is characterized by impairments in the perception or expression of reality, most commonly manifesting as auditory hallucinations, paranoid or bizarre delusions or disorganized speech and thinking. Schizophrenia patients also suffer from significant cognitive dysfunction. This is reflected in difficulty of daily functioning, decreased ability to maintain normal social relationships and impaired job performance. Schizophrenia is a multi-factorial disease that involves an imbalance in two key chemicals that transmit signals between neurons and other cells, known as neurotransmitters: dopamine and GABA.
Currently available treatments for schizophrenia include two broad classes of antipsychotics: “typical” and “atypical.” Both classes of medications are similarly effective at treating schizophrenia but have varying and severe side effects that limit patient compliance. Atypical antipsychotics are the current standard of care for schizophrenia patients. Typical antipsychotics generally cause debilitating movement disorders known as Extra-Pyramidal Side (EPS) effects. Atypical antipsychotics have fewer motor side effects but may cause increased risks of obesity, diabetes and high blood cholesterol. Both classes of antipsychotics do not adequately address cognitive function, and improvement in cognition represents an unmet medical need for patients of schizophrenia and other psychiatric and neurological diseases.
There are a number of different medications available to treat schizophrenia. The most commonly used atypical antipsychotics available on the market are Risperdal, Zyprexa and Seroquel. Risperdal is marketed by Janssen, a division of Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Johnson & Johnson company. Johnson & Johnson reported annual sales of Risperdal of $1.5 billion for 2010 in its annual report for the year ended December 31, 2010. Zyprexa is marketed by Lilly USA, LLC, a company of Eli Lilly and Company. Eli Lilly reported annual sales of Zyprexa of $5.0 billion for 2010 in its annual report for the year ended December 31, 2010. Seroquel is marketed by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. AstraZeneca reported annual sales of Seroquel of $5.3 billion for 2010 in its annual report for the year ended December 31, 2010. Approximately 10% to 30% of schizophrenia patients do not respond to, or do not tolerate, a particular medication and, accordingly, will often be rotated through a series of medications until medical practitioners identify the best treatment for them, as described in an article by Daniel E. Casey et. al. published in 2003 in the journal
Pharmacology
.
Development and Commercialization
In June 2010, we entered into an exclusive, royalty-bearing out-licensing arrangement with Cypress Bioscience with regard to BL-1020, covering the United States, Canada and Mexico, which became effective in August 2010. We received an upfront fee of $30.0 million from Cypress Bioscience upon the effectiveness of the agreement. We are obligated to pay to Bar Ilan Research and Development and Ramot, collectively, a royalty payment equal to 22.5% of the net consideration we receive from the out-licensing of BL-1020. We paid Bar Ilan Research and Development and Ramot $6.75 million, in the aggregate, from the $30.0 million upfront fee. We also paid the OCS $3.0 million as partial repayment of grants previously received for the BL-1020 development program. See “Business — In-Licensing Agreements — BL-1020.”
In January 2011, Royalty Pharma acquired Cypress Bioscience. After the acquisition, we had a number of discussions with Cypress Bioscience and Royalty Pharma and they indicated to us that as a result of a change in their strategy, they believed it was in the best interest of BL-1020’s future commercial potential to consolidate the worldwide rights with our company. Cypress Bioscience expressed its desire that development of BL-1020 continue in a manner that both optimized Cypress Bioscience’s investment in BL-1020 and provided the best long-term commercialization potential. We believe that reacquiring BL-1020 was the best alternative at that time to ensure the timely development of BL-1020 and represents a significant opportunity for our company. Accordingly, on May 10, 2011, we entered into a rights reacquisition agreement with Cypress Bioscience. Under the terms and conditions of the rights reacquisition agreement, the out-license agreement terminated effective May 31, 2011, and we reacquired all of the rights to develop and commercialize BL-1020. In consideration for the reacquisition of the rights, we agreed to pay Cypress Bioscience a royalty equal to 1% of the future net sales of BL-1020, if any, by us, our affiliates or our sublicensees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the aggregate royalty payment shall not exceed $80.0 million. In addition, we agreed to pay Cypress Bioscience $10.0 million payable solely from amounts we receive, if any, pursuant to future agreements relating to the further development or commercialization of a product containing BL-1020, either alone or with other therapeutically active ingredients. In connection with the payment, we are required to pay Cypress Bioscience 10% of all payments under any such agreement but in any event, not more than $10.0 million. If any such agreement requires that we incur the costs of certain proposed clinical trials of BL-1020, the payment schedule will be subject to certain deferrals. We have no other outstanding material obligations to Cypress Bioscience under the original out-license agreement, other than standard indemnification obligations. We intend to continue to consider potential out-licensing opportunities for BL-1020, as well as the potential to develop and commercialize BL-1020 internally.
Clinical and Preclinical Results
. We conducted a phase 2b clinical trial, which we refer to as the EAGLE trial, in order to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of BL-1020 compared to placebo. Risperdal, a commonly prescribed antipsychotic, was used in the trial, at a dose of 2 – 8 mg, as a positive control to validate the study’s results. The EAGLE trial was conducted under an FDA Investigational New Drug (IND) application process at 40 sites in the United States, Europe and India and included patients suffering from acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. In this six-week study, 363 patients were randomized for treatment with a low (10 mg/day) or high (20 – 30mg/day) dose of BL-1020, Risperdal (2 – 8mg/day) or placebo. The study was designed to demonstrate statistically significant superiority of BL-1020 to placebo on the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), the primary efficacy measure. The key secondary efficacy measures included the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) and the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), which are recognized measures of severity and improvement in schizophrenia. The secondary efficacy measures also included a Readiness to Discharge Questionnaire (RDQ) and a Strauss Carpenter Level of Functioning Scale. A pre-specified exploratory end point of the study was cognition as measured by the “Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia” (BACS) test. The study was completed in July 2009 and we announced the results of the study in September 2009.
The results show that the BL-1020 high dose group (20 – 30mg/day) experienced a significant improvement in primary and secondary efficacy measures. For the primary efficacy measure, the high dose group (20 – 30mg/day) showed a reduction in PANSS versus placebo (LS mean -23.6 vs. -14.4; p=0.002). The superiority of BL-1020 (20 – 30mg/day) over placebo was also supported by secondary efficacy measures including CGI-S and CGI-C. Furthermore, statistically significant increases in the number of patients rated as “responders” in the BL-1020 (20 – 30mg/day) group compared to placebo on the PANSS, CGI-S, and CGI-C was in line with all other efficacy measures.
The following table presents a summary of the EAGLE trial results for efficacy:
|
Endpoint
|
|
Placebo
|
BL-1020
(20 – 30mg)
|
Risperdal
|
||
|
PANSS
|
|
-14.4
|
-23.6
P=0.002 (vs. placebo)
P=0.39 (vs. Risperdal)
|
-26.2
P<0.001 (vs. placebo)
|
||
|
CGI-S
|
|
-0.68
|
-1.27
P<0.001 (vs. placebo)
P=0.607 (vs. Risperdal)
|
-1.35
P<0.001 (vs. placebo)
|
||
|
Strauss Carpenter Level of
Functioning Scale
|
|
0.20
|
1.93
P=0.017 (vs. placebo)
P=0.563 vs. Risperdal
|
2.35
P=0.003 (vs. placebo)
|
||
|
Clinical Responders
|
|
47.3%
|
70.8%
P=0.01 (vs. placebo)
P= 0.796 vs. Risperdal
|
72.5%
P<0.001 (vs. placebo)
|
Cognitive function in the EAGLE trial was assessed by the BACS test. The BACS test comprises the following six components: verbal memory, digit sequencing, token motor task, verbal fluency, symbol coding and the “Tower of London” puzzle. The EAGLE trial results indicate that patients treated for six weeks with the 20 – 30mg dose of BL-1020 exhibited a clinically relevant and statistically significant improvement of 9.27 points in the BACS score as opposed to the placebo control group (6.01 points). In addition, the high dose group of BL-1020 was superior to the Risperdal control group (with 6.2 points improvement). BL-1020 exhibited statistical significance to both the placebo and Risperdal control groups (p=0.027 for both).
The following table presents a summary of the EAGLE trial results for cognition:
|
Parameter
|
|
Placebo
|
BL-1020
(20 – 30mg)
|
Risperdal
|
||
|
BACS
(LS mean, LOCF)
|
|
6.01
|
9.27
|
6.2
|
||
|
P value vs. placebo
|
|
P=0.027
|
P=0.893
|
|||
|
P value vs. Risperdal
|
|
P=0.027
|
Analysis of safety did not indicate any increased toxicity associated with BL-1020 treatment in comparison with the placebo. There was no incidence of SAEs (Severe Adverse Events) in the BL-1020 (20 – 30mg/day) group but the Risperdal and placebo groups experienced SAE rates of 3.3% and 6.5%, respectively. Discontinuations due to Adverse Events (AEs) were similar in the BL-1020 (20 – 30mg/day) group (4.5%) and in the placebo group (4.3%) but higher in the Risperdal group (8.8%). There were no statistically significant or clinically relevant AEs of body weight gain, glucose increases, and changes in lipids, all indicating that BL-1020 has no metabolic AE propensity. BL-1020 at its high dose level induced a slight increase in the Extra-Pyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale (ESRS) that did not differ significantly from Risperdal. The incidence of cardiovascular, sexual, psychiatric, autonomic and gastrointestinal AEs was low and was not increased compared to placebo. There were no statistically significant or clinically relevant changes in the measurements of the ECG, laboratory or vital signs.
The following table presents a summary of the EAGLE trial results for safety:
|
Parameter
|
|
Placebo
|
BL-1020
(20 – 30mg)
|
Risperdal
|
||
|
Severe Adverse Events
(SAE, % patients)
|
|
6.5
|
0
|
3.3
|
||
|
Discontinuation due to Adverse Events
(AE, %)
|
|
4.3
|
4.5
|
8.8
|
||
|
ESRS
|
|
1.6
|
10.8
|
10.8
|
||
|
Metabolic – weight gain
(% notable gain)
|
3.6
|
4.9
|
7.3
|
|||
|
Metabolic – cholesterol
|
No change
|
No change
|
No change
|
In January 2010, we announced the results of a six-week extension trial of BL-1020. In the extension trial, 75 patients that completed the phase 2b EAGLE clinical trial were randomized as follows: patients that were treated with either BL-1020 or Risperdal in the phase 2b EAGLE clinical trial continued their treatment and patients that were treated with placebo in the phase 2b EAGLE clinical trial were re-randomized to one of the BL-1020 groups. Patients in the extension trial maintained the levels of improvement in PANSS and CGI identified in the phase 2b EAGLE clinical trial. In addition, patients showed additional improvement in cognition with the extension trial and there were no clinically relevant changes in the measurements of ECG, laboratory or vital signs (BP, HR, Temp.).
In February 2009, we announced the results of our open label, six-week phase 2a trial of BL-1020 in Romania. The study was designed to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose of BL-1020 in schizophrenia patients and was conducted on 36 chronically ill hospitalized patients. Only four patients dropped out of the trial, which we believe is a relatively low dropout rate. Patients were initially treated with 20mg of BL-1020 and received increasing dosages over the first seven days in order to meet the maximum dose of 40mg. Patients that were treated with BL-1020 experienced a statistically significant improvement from baseline in the PANSS and Clinical Global Impression of Severity and Improvement (CGI-S; CGI-I). This improvement was seen as early as seven days after the onset of treatment. There was a statistically significant (p<0.001) improvement on the PANSS total (baseline+84.9; day 42=63.8), and the positive (baseline+22.3; day 42=15.1), negative (baseline=20.9; day 42=16.6) and general psychopathology subscales (baseline=42.4; day 42=32.1). More than 80% of the patients showed a statistically significant improvement as reflected by the CGI-S and CGI-I. No severe or unexpected adverse effects occurred in the trial. There was no significant increase in extra-pyramidal symptoms at the end of the trial, and no clinically relevant change in weight. There were no notable findings on ECG, laboratory values or vital signs. All adverse events were characterized as minimal and not treatment limiting.
In July 2007, we completed a phase 1b clinical trial which examined the ability of BL-1020 to bind dopamine receptors in the brain. The level of dopamine receptors binding in the brain is directly related to antipsychotic efficacy. This study was conducted pursuant to an FDA IND application process and an application to conduct clinical trials in Sweden that was submitted to the Swedish Ministry of Health. The study investigated the ability of BL-1020 to bind dopamine receptors in the human brain and provided additional safety and tolerability data. The study was a single-center, randomized, open label study performed on three dosage groups, each with four healthy volunteers who received a single dose of either 10mg, 15mg or 20mg of BL-1020. We assessed receptor occupancy using positron emission tomography, or a PET scan, that is able to register the activity of various parts of the brain following the administration of a labeled dopamine binder. The data derived from the study demonstrated a dose dependent increase in dopamine binding with computer modeling showing receptor occupancy of between 80% and 90% at the 20mg dose upon repeated administrations. The antipsychotic efficacy of dopamine blockers is presumed to occur at dopamine binding levels of 65% or more. BL-1020 did not produce any significant changes in the subjects’ electrocardiogram test results, vital signs, clinical chemistry levels or hematology levels.
In October 2006, we completed a phase 1 clinical trial conducted under the supervision of the Israel Ministry of Health. The study was a single dose escalating, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Six dosage groups of BL-1020 were tested, 2.5mg, 5mg, 10mg, 15mg, 20mg and 25mg. Each group consisted of eight volunteers with two receiving a placebo and six receiving BL-1020. The study subjects exhibited no cardiac, neurological or psychological side effects. We believe that the findings are indicative of the safety and tolerability of BL-1020.
Extensive preclinical testing indicated that BL-1020 successfully demonstrated antipsychotic efficacy in animal models of schizophrenia and did not cause Extra-Pyramidal Side Effects at the therapeutic levels. Preclinical studies also demonstrated the potential for BL-1020 to improve cognition and provided support for our belief that the GABAergic effects of the compound resulted in cognitive improvement.
BL-1040
BL-1040 is a novel resorbable polymer solution being developed to prevent the cardiac remodeling that may occur in patients that suffered an AMI. AMIs result from an occlusion in the coronary artery and affect the left ventricle of the heart, or the LV. Patients with severe injury to the LV may be at risk for developing harmful changes in the size, shape and function of the LV, or cardiac remodeling, that may lead to congestive heart failure (CHF). In the clinical trial, BL-1040 is administered via the coronary artery and flows into the damaged heart muscle. The liquid BL-1040 transforms into a gel within the infarcted cardiac tissue and forms a “scaffold” that supports, retains the shape of, and enhances the mechanical strength of the heart muscle during recovery and repair, which we believe prevents the pathological enlargement of the ventricle following an AMI. By supporting the damaged heart tissue during the natural healing process, we expect that BL-1040 will prevent the progressive ventricle enlargement that often follows AMIs. After discussions between Ikaria and the FDA, it has been determined that BL-1040 should be developed as a medical device, specifically under the PMA pathway in the United States. There can be no assurance, however, that the FDA or comparable foreign agencies will not determine that BL-1040 needs to be assessed as a drug instead of a medical device.
BL-1040 is being developed to treat patients that suffered an AMI and are at a high risk to develop significant cardiac remodeling. Based on our review of data regarding the incidence of myocardial infarctions in the United States, we believe that in 2009, approximately 400,000 people in the United States will have been at risk of significant cardiac remodeling after an AMI. Prevention of cardiac remodeling may prevent transition to congestive heart failure and/or improve patient survival over the long term.
We believe that BL-1040 is a novel, safe and non-surgical treatment for patients who suffered heart attacks and are at risk for cardiac remodeling and CHF. We believe that the transformation of BL-1040 into a gel is a result of the polymer chains’ interaction with elevated levels of calcium ions present at the injury site. As the heart heals, we believe that there is a natural decrease in the calcium concentration causing the BL-1040 gel to transform back to liquid form and then be excreted naturally from the body within six weeks of injection. The data from our preclinical studies indicate that treatment with BL-1040 preserves the normal functioning of the heart.
We obtained a worldwide, exclusive license for BL-1040 from B.G. Negev Technologies to research, develop, market and sell BL-1040 and are required to pay B.G. Negev Technologies 28% of the revenues we receive as consideration in connection with any sublicensing, co-marketing or co-promotion, or a permitted assignment, of BL-1040, which includes the revenues we have received, and expect to receive, under our out-licensing agreement with Ikaria. See “Business — In-Licensing Agreements — BL-1040.” We have agreed to pay Ramot a portion of the payments we make to B.G. Negev Technologies in connection with the in-license arrangement to satisfy contractual obligations between B.G. Negev Technologies and Ramot with respect to certain intellectual property rights to the licensed technology. We have also agreed to indemnify Ramot and certain of its related parties in connection with our use of the technology we in-licensed from B.G. Negev Technologies.
Acute Myocardial Infarction.
AMI is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity among both men and women. Statistical estimates from the American Heart Association indicate that approximately 1.0 million cases of nonfatal myocardial infarction are reported each year in the United States alone. AMI is caused by a severe narrowing of coronary arteries, known as atherosclerotic occlusion, often exacerbated by the formation of clots. The narrowing and/or blockage in the coronary artery disrupts the blood supply to cardiac tissue, resulting in extensive cell death that constitutes the AMI. As a result, the affected region of the heart muscle is generally replaced by scar tissue over a six-to eight-week period. The scarred region often dilates progressively in the days and months following an AMI, leading to abnormalities in heart chamber shape, size and functional capacity as described in an article by Paul W.M. Fedak published in 2005 in the journal
Cardiovascular Pathology
. Those surviving the acute phase of an AMI (i.e., the first 30 days) are at greater risk for sudden death due to arrhythmias and progressive congestive heart failure. There are a number of different approaches to prevent cardiac remodeling that have been, or currently are, the subject of preclinical and clinical trials. Certain medications, including ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers have been shown to reduce cardiac remodeling. Despite the wide use of these medications, based on our review of data regarding patients with large anterior infarcts, at least 20% of those patients may progress to heart failure due to cardiac remodeling and a subsequent reduction in ejection fraction, or the fraction of blood pumped out of a ventricle with each heart-beat.
Development and Commercialization Arrangement.
In July 2009, we entered into a licensing arrangement with Ikaria which was amended and restated in August 2009. Under the amended and restated license and commercialization agreement, we granted Ikaria an exclusive, worldwide license to develop, manufacture and commercialize BL-1040 for use in the prevention, mitigation and treatment of injury to the myocardial tissue of the heart. Ikaria is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to complete clinical development of, and to commercialize, BL-1040 or a product related thereto. We were responsible for the costs of the completed phase 1/2 trial. Ikaria is responsible for the costs associated with conducting all other development and regulatory activities of BL-1040, including those costs relating to the completion of its clinical development, the conduct and funding of its commercialization and the prosecution and maintenance of patents. We have received $17.0 million from Ikaria and we are entitled to receive up to an additional $265.5 million from Ikaria upon achievement of certain development, regulatory, and commercial milestones. In addition, we are entitled to receive from Ikaria royalties from net sales of any product developed under the agreement ranging from 11% to 15%, depending on net sales levels achieved by Ikaria, and its affiliates and sublicensees. However, if Ikaria is required to obtain a license from a third party in order to exercise its rights under the agreement with Ikaria, the royalty we receive on net sales may be less than 11%.
Clinical and Preclinical Results.
We commenced a pilot phase 1/2 multi-center open label study of BL-1040 in March 2009. The study was designed to assess the safety and feasibility of BL-1040 in patients following an AMI. The trial was conducted in nine sites in Germany and Belgium and was completed in January 2010. In the trial, 27 patients were successfully treated with BL-1040 with no device-related clinically significant complications including arrhythmia, elevations in cardiac enzymes or occlusions. On February 24, 2010, we received the final assessment of the Independent Safety Monitoring Board, or ISMB. The ISMB’s conclusions, relating to the 27 patients who participated in the study and completed a six-month follow-up period, indicated that the treatment is safe and that it would be appropriate to continue clinical development of the device. The FDA must approve an investigational drug exemption (IDE) for BL-1040 before human clinical trials of BL-1040 can be conducted in the United States.
After consultation by Ikaria with the FDA, BL-1040 is being developed as a class III medical device under the FDA’s pre-marketing approval, or PMA, regulatory pathway. In December 2011, Ikaria commenced PRESERVATION 1, a CE Mark registration clinical trial of BL-1040 (BCM). The purpose of PRESERVATION 1 is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of BL-1040 (BCM) for prevention of ventricular remodeling and congestive heart failure when administered following AMI. The trial is a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multi-country and multi-center trial including approximately 300 patients who currently are expected to be recruited across over 90 sites. This includes approximately 50 Australian patients at 11 clinical trial sites. The BCM device will be administered to subjects who had successful percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and they will then be monitored for six months.
Prior to initiating the pilot phase 1/2 study, we evaluated BL-1040 in preclinical safety, biocompatibility, and efficacy studies conducted in accordance with FDA recommendations. We interpreted the safety and biocompatibility studies to demonstrate that the anticipated human dosages are not expected to produce significant local or systemic toxicity. Preclinical efficacy studies in rat, dog and pig models of AMI showed that BL-1040 administered immediately following an AMI and up to seven days after the AMI provides long-term protection to the heart tissue by preventing progressive LV dilation. Our preclinical dog studies have also indicated that BL-1040 may improve survival rates following a significant AMI.
Other Clinical Therapeutic Candidates
BL-5010
BL-5010 is a novel formulation composed of two organic acids being developed for the removal of skin lesions in a nonsurgical manner. Other formulations of the components of BL-5010 have already been approved for use in cosmetics. If approved, BL-5010 would be a convenient alternative to invasive, painful and expensive removal treatments for skin lesions and may allow for histological examination. Because treatment with BL-5010 is non-invasive, we believe BL-5010 poses minimal infection risk, and requires no anesthesia or bandaging. BL-5010 is applied topically on a skin lesion with a wood applicator for a few minutes and causes the lesion to dry out gradually and shed from the skin within a few weeks. We in-licensed the exclusive, worldwide rights to develop, market and sell BL-5010 from IPC in November 2007. BL-5010 has recently received European confirmation from the British Standards Institution Notified Body (BSI) in the UK, of the regulatory pathway classification as a Class IIa medical device. We are currently evaluating the most advantageous ways to progress with this therapeutic candidate from a clinical and business perspective.
Skin Lesions
. Clinically diagnosed skin lesions, or a growth or patch of skin that does not resemble the area surrounding it, are very common and often constitute a cosmetic and functional annoyance. Moles and warts are examples of skin lesions. Currently, skin lesions are removed using either cryotherapy (liquid nitrogen), electro-coagulation (electrical burning), laser treatments or through surgery. Cryotherapy, electro-coagulation and laser treatments do not preserve the lesions’ cellular structure and are used for removing benign superficial lesions. These methods are often associated with pain and inflammation that can last for several months. Surgery is used when histological examination of skin lesions is required. Surgery has to be conducted under sterile conditions and requires anesthesia. Furthermore, the cosmetic outcome of surgical removal is generally undesirable.
Clinical Trial
. In June 2009, we announced the initiation of a phase 1/2 clinical trial in 60 patients with seborrheic keratosis in Germany and the Netherlands to assess the safety and efficacy of BL-5010 in completely removing the lesion and to assess the cosmetic outcome of the novel treatment. In addition, the study was designed to assess the feasibility of preserving the cellular structure of skin lesions for subsequent histological exams. The study was completed in September 2010, and positive results were announced in December, 2010. The results of the trial show that for 96.7% of patients, the treated lesion fell off within 30 days of a single application of BL-5010. The results also showed that BL-5010 has a good safety profile, as no persistent irreversible adverse effects were observed at the treated site. None of the patients reported moderate or severe drug-related adverse events. Mild adverse events reported included skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (n=5, 8.3%) and general and administration site disorders (n=2, 3.3%). Pruritus was the only drug-related adverse event reported by more than two patients (n=4, 6.7%). In addition, most of the investigators and patients who participated in the trial reported that they were very satisfied with the cosmetic outcome of the treatment (94.6% of the investigators and 84% of the patients stated that the results were good or excellent 180 days following treatment). In addition, histological examination of treated lesions indicate BL-5010’s efficacy in preserving the cellular structure of treated lesions.
BL-1021
BL-1021 is a new chemical entity in development for the treatment of neuropathic pain, or pain that results from damage to nerve fibers. Multiple preclinical
in vitro
and
in vivo
animal studies have the safety and efficacy of BL-1021. We licensed exclusive, worldwide rights to research, develop and commercialize BL-1021 from Bar Ilan Research and Development and Ramot.
Neuropathic Pain
. Neuropathic pain is a complex, chronic state of pain that results from dysfunctional or injured nerve fibers. Over time, the body establishes recurring “pain signaling cycles” that persist for a long time after the healing of the nerve injury that first caused the pain. Neuropathic pain is associated with various conditions, including shingles and diabetes, and, according to a 2008 DataMonitor report, neuropathic pain affects 1% to 3% of the population. According to a 2011 DataMonitor report, the market for neuropathic pain treatments was $2.4 billion (in the seven major markets — the United States, Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom) and is expected to reach $4.1 billion in 2018. Neuropathic pain may cause extreme discomfort for extended periods of time. Patients describe the symptoms as burning, stabbing, electric shock or itching sensations. Medical professionals treat neuropathic pain with a variety of medications, including the antidepressants amitriptyline and duloxetine and the anti-seizure medicine gabapentin. However, these medications have significant side effects and are not always effective.
Preclinical and Clinical Results
. The efficacy of BL-1021 has been demonstrated in preclinical studies. BL-1021 showed significant reduction in symptoms of neuropathic pain with reduced side effects in animal models. The BL-1021 molecule was administered orally in such animal studies and was found to be superior to available treatments in efficacy and/or side effect measures.
The initiation of clinical trials of BL-1021 in Israel was approved by the institutional review board, or Helsinki Committee, of a major medical institution in Israel in June 2010, and by the Israeli Ministry of Health in October 2010. In June 2011, we commenced a phase 1 clinical trial of BL-1021 in Israel, and commenced treatment of the first patient in the trial. In December 2011, we completed a phase 1a clinical trial to assess safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single administration of BL-1021 at doses between 10mg and 80mg in healthy volunteers. This clinical trial was a single-site, double-blind, placebo controlled study, carried out at the Hadassah Clinical Research Center (HCRC) in Jerusalem, Israel. The study aimed at assessing the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single administration of BL-1021 (between 10 mg and 80 mg) in healthy male subjects. Study results demonstrated that a single administration of BL-1021 in the dose range examined was safe and well tolerated, with no significant changes noted in vital signs, ECG or laboratory safety parameters at any dose when compared either to baseline measurements or to the placebo group. In addition, preliminary modeling of the pharmacokinetic data collected in this trial predicts that a once daily administration of BL-1021 at the dose levels assessed will enable reaching effective doses in patients.
BL-7040
BL-7040 is a novel oligonucleotide which we intend to develop for the treatment of IBD. It is an orally-available, synthetic oligonucleotide consisting of a sequence of nucleic acids, the building blocks of genetic material such as DNA, with unique dual activity. It has a specific agonist effect on a receptor involved in the immune system and inflammatory reactions called Toll-Like Receptor 9 (TLR-9). It also acts as a specific suppressor of acetylcholinesterase, a key enzyme involved in neurological pathways. In addition, BL-7040 has an indirect effect on the production of key pro-inflammatory compounds called cytokines as well as anti-inflammatory properties via modulation of macrophages.
We in-licensed the exclusive, worldwide rights to develop, and/or sell BL-7040 from Yissum in June 2011. Yissum had previously out-licensed the compound to Ester Neurosciences who performed phase 1 safety and pharmacokinetics studies and a phase 2a study examining the efficacy of the compound for the treatment of Myasthenia Gravis, an autoimmune, neurodegenerative disease. We intend to develop the compound for the treatment of IBD and other inflammatory diseases.
Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
IBD, including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic inflammatory gastrointestinal disease characterized by chronic abdominal pain, discomfort, bloating and alteration of bowel habits. According to Datamonitor, in 2009 there were estimated to be 890,000 people with Crohn's disease, over half of them in the United States, and there are estimated to be 1.4 million cases of ulcerative colitis in the seven major markets. There are few specific treatment options available to treat IBD and many of the treatments are either insufficiently effective, very expensive or have serious side effects. Approved treatments include steroids, which treat inflammation, and immunomodulators, which have an effect on the immune system. Biologics, which are therapeutics that are created by biologic processes rather than chemical synthesis, especially anti-TNFs (tumor necrosis factors which are actively involved in the inflammatory process), have become critical induction and maintenance agents. Remicade (infliximab), a treatment marketed by Janssen Biotech, Inc., a Johnson & Johnson company, Merck & Co. and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, is the first approved anti-TNF for the treatment of IBD and is considered the gold standard of treatment. However, it is administered by IV, has a black box warning for serious infections and cancer and, like other biologics, is very expensive. Another approved treatment for IBD is Humira (adalimumab), which is self-administered by sub-cutaneous injection, giving it an advantage over treatments with other forms of administration. Humira is marketed by Abbot Laboratories and Eisai Co. Sales of existing drugs to treat IBD are estimated by Datamonitor to be $3.5 billion annually in the seven major markets.
Clinical and Preclinical Results.
We plan to enter a phase 2 study of BL-7040 to evaluate the effectiveness of BL-7040 for the treatment of IBD during 2012. The phase 2a study conducted by Ester Neurosciences was a multi-national, multi-center, cross-over, double-blind study to compare the efficacy of three doses of BL-7040 (10, 20 and 40 mg). A total of 31 patients with a clinical diagnosis of Myasthenia Gravis (MG) according to the MG Foundation of America (MGFA) classification were enrolled in the study. The efficacy of the three doses of BL-7040 given orally once daily for one week was evaluated using changes in the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Test (QMG), a grading system used in the comparative analysis of therapeutic interventions for MG, between baseline and end of treatment. The improvements observed in patients at the end of each week for each dose level of BL-7040 were clinically and statistically significant compared to the baseline for that week. All three doses resulted in an improvement in the severity of the MG symptoms and appear superior to Mestinon, the current first line treatment for MG, with no adverse events reported.
The phase 1b study conducted by Ester Neurosciences was an open label study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of escalating doses of BL-7040 administered orally to patients with MG. A total of 16 patients participated in the study. During the first day of treatment, each patient received 10 mcg/kg, 50 mcg/kg and 150 mcg/kg. During days two through four, patients received a daily dose of 500 mcg/kg. All of the patients completed the treatment and no major adverse events related to the study drug were reported.
Prior to initiating the clinical trials, BL-7040 was evaluated in preclinical safety and efficacy studies. Safety data available includes: acute single dose in mice, single and repeated dose in rats, repeated dose in monkeys by oral and IV administration, genetic toxicity and safety pharmacology studies. BL-7040 was found to have no mutagenic or clastogenic potential. BL-7040 was also found to have no toxic effects in any of the studies conducted at a dose range of 150mg/kg to 1,000mg/kg body weight/day by oral gavage or 500 mcg/kg-200 mg/kg body weight/day by IV administration in rodents and monkeys.
BL-7040 was evaluated in a well-validated murine model of IBD (TNBS (2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid)-induced IBD). It was found that BL-7040’s therapeutic effect was similar to dexamethasone, a common routine steroidal treatment for human colitis. BL-7040 induced a statistically significantly decrease in the severity of the colitis (a decrease of about 80%). Other studies have demonstrated the specific agonistic effect of BL-7040 on TLR-9.
Therapeutic Candidates in Preclinical Development
The table below sets forth the development status of our preclinical stage therapeutic candidates and the indications for which they are being developed.
|
Therapeutic
|
||||||||
|
Candidate
|
Description
|
Indication
|
Status
|
In-Licensing Source
|
||||
|
BL-5040
|
Protein
|
IBD/Cachexia
|
Preclinical studies
|
Yissum Ltd.
|
||||
|
BL-6010
|
Small molecule
|
Type 2 Diabetes
|
Preclinical studies
|
Bar Ilan Research and Development
|
||||
|
BL-6020
|
Small molecule
|
Cancer Cachexia
|
Preclinical studies
|
Santhera Pharmaceuticals
|
||||
|
BL-6030
|
Small molecule
|
Bacterial Infection
|
Preclinical studies
|
Yissum Ltd.
|
||||
|
BL-6040
|
Small molecule
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
|
Preclinical studies
|
Yissum Ltd.
|
||||
|
BL-7010
|
Polymer
|
Celiac Disease
|
Preclinical studies
|
Gestion Univalor, Limited Partnership
|
||||
|
BL-7020
|
Protein
|
Psoriasis
|
Preclinical studies
|
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and BioRap Technologies Ltd.
|
||||
|
BL-7030
|
Small molecule
|
Cancer
|
Preclinical studies
|
Algen Biopharmaceuticals Inc. (licensee of Yissum Ltd.)
|
||||
|
BL-7050
|
Small molecule
|
Neuropathic Pain
|
Preclinical studies
|
Ramot
|
||||
|
BL-7060
|
Peptide
|
Acute Myocardial Infarction
|
Preclinical studies
|
Compugen Ltd.
|
||||
|
BL-8010
|
Peptide
|
Retinopathy
|
Preclinical studies
|
Compugen Ltd.
|
||||
|
BL-8020
|
Small molecule
|
Hepatitis C
|
Preclinical studies
|
Genoscience
|
||||
|
BL-8030
|
Small molecule
|
Hepatitis C
|
Preclinical studies
|
Genoscience and RFS Pharma
|
Product Development Approach
We seek to develop a pipeline of promising therapeutic candidates that exhibit distinct advantages over currently available therapies or address unmet medical needs. Our resources are focused on advancing our therapeutic candidates through development and toward commercialization. Our current drug development pipeline consists of 18 therapeutic candidates with an additional 10 therapeutic candidates in our EDP pipeline, a program primarily funded by one of our shareholders to support a portion of our early feasibility work on therapeutic candidates. See “Business — Early Development Program Agreement.”
We have established relationships with various universities, academic and research institutions and biotechnology companies that permit us to identify and select compounds at a very early stage of development. Initially, we focused on Israeli institutions as the primary source of our therapeutic candidates. In Israel, we established close relationships with the Technion — the Israel Institute of Technology, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv University, Bar Ilan University and the Weizmann Institute. More recently, we have begun to source therapeutic candidate opportunities worldwide. Although our focus since inception has been on identifying development stage therapeutic candidates, we have begun evaluating pre-clinical and clinical candidates in order to introduce therapeutic candidates with a greater potential for clinical success to our pipeline.
Once we identify a candidate, it enters our internal evaluation system and undergoes our rigorous selection process. We employ internal research efforts to evaluate candidates. We evaluate each compound’s potential for success by looking at the candidate’s efficacy, safety, total estimated development costs, technological novelty, patent status, market need and approvability. Following evaluation and diligence, each therapeutic candidate is evaluated by our Scientific Advisory Board and by disease-specific advisors for external scientific review. Following a Scientific Advisory Board meeting, the compound is referred to either the EDP or more advanced feasibility testing. Candidates that have successfully progressed through our EDP will generally be subject to a shorter feasibility period once the compound is introduced to our pipeline as fewer studies will be required. At each step of the process, a therapeutic candidate is subjected to critical evaluation and potential termination. Our approach is consistent with our objective of proceeding only with therapeutic candidates that we believe exhibit a relatively high probability of therapeutic and commercial success. To date, we estimate we have screened over 1,500 compounds, and we have introduced more than 60 candidates to our Scientific Advisory Board for consideration, initiated development of 41 therapeutic candidates and terminated 23 feasibility programs.
Once we approve a development-stage compound, we in-license the candidate and any related technology and our drug development team and project managers identify, define and oversee the necessary steps to development and commercialization. The initial feasibility phase of development is critical to our approach. We design experiments that challenge the identified weaknesses of a compound, verify initial data by utilizing third-party contract research organizations and test the compound in models that more accurately mimic human disease.
Our development approach focuses on identifying and following what we believe will be successful pathways to commercialization. Our team has the expertise to move our candidates through all phases of preclinical and clinical development. Our staff includes professionals with extensive experience in drug development, chemistry, manufacturing and controls, or CMC, preclinical experimentation, clinical development, regulatory affairs and business development. We perform all of our development activities in our good laboratory practices, or GLP, grade chemistry laboratory or outsource these activities to contract research organizations, or CROs, that meet applicable regulatory standards. Following the generation of sufficient preclinical data, applications to regulatory authorities for the initiation of clinical trials are submitted. Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials are then conducted to demonstrate clinical proof of safety and efficacy. Following this stage of development we seek either to sub-license the therapeutic candidate to a pharmaceutical partner or, in certain circumstances, we may elect to complete development by ourselves. To the extent we in-license later stage compounds, we may eliminate certain of these development efforts.
Out-Licensing Agreement with Ikaria
In July 2009, we entered into a licensing arrangement with Ikaria which was amended and restated in August 2009. Under the amended and restated license and commercialization agreement, we granted Ikaria an exclusive, worldwide license to develop, manufacture and commercialize BL-1040 for use in the prevention, mitigation and treatment of injury to the myocardial tissue of the heart. Ikaria is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to complete clinical development of, and to commercialize, BL-1040 or a product related thereto. We were responsible for the costs of the completed phase 1/2 studies. Ikaria is responsible for the costs associated with conducting all other development and regulatory activities of BL-1040, including those costs relating to the completion of its clinical development, the conduct and funding of its commercialization and the prosecution and maintenance of patents.
Pursuant to the agreement, Ikaria paid us an initial up-front payment equal to $7.0 million on the effective date of the agreement and in April 2010 paid us a milestone payment of $10.0 million. We are entitled to receive up to an additional $265.5 million from Ikaria upon achievement of certain development, regulatory, and commercial milestones. In addition, we are entitled to receive from Ikaria royalties from net sales of any product developed under the agreement ranging from 11% to 15%, depending on net sales levels achieved by Ikaria or its sublicensees, as applicable. However, if Ikaria is required to obtain a license from a third party in order to exercise its rights under the agreement with us, the royalty we receive on net sales may be less than 11%. We must pay 28% of all net consideration we receive from Ikaria to B.G. Negev Technologies, the institution from whom we initially in-licensed the development rights to BL-1040. See “Business — In-Licensing Agreements — BL-1040.” Certain payments we may receive from Ikaria in the future, if at all, may be subject to a 15% withholding tax in the United States. We believe that we may be able to get a refund of withholding taxes paid in connection with future payments from the U.S. government but there can be no assurance that we will be able to get such a refund. In addition, we may be able to use U.S. taxes withheld from future payments as credits against Israeli corporate income tax, when we have income, if at all, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to realize the credits. Royalty payments to B.G. Negev Technologies are made net of the withholding taxes. We have agreed to pay Ramot a portion of the payments we make to B.G. Negev Technologies in connection with the in-license arrangement to satisfy contractual obligations between B.G. Negev Technologies and Ramot with respect to certain intellectual property rights to the licensed technology.
Ikaria has the right to sub-license BL-1040 in arms’-length transactions consistent with the terms and conditions of the license and commercialization agreement. If Ikaria receives an upfront payment under a sublicense, Ikaria is required to pay us 10% of such payment. We have the option to manufacture at least 20% of BL-1040 products pursuant to the terms of a supply agreement to be negotiated in good faith, provided this option is exercised six months prior to the date Ikaria intends to file for regulatory approval for BL-1040 in the United States.
Ikaria bears the costs of the worldwide prosecution and maintenance of the patents for BL-1040. We have the right to intervene and maintain our patents in any country where Ikaria declines to file or prosecute those patents, or if it does not take actions necessary to avoid abandonment of those patents.
Our agreement with Ikaria expires on a product-by-product basis and a country-by-country basis on the date royalties are no longer payable in connection with the product in a given country. Either party may terminate the agreement by providing 90 days’ written notice of a material breach of the agreement by the other party if the breaching party does not cure the breach during that time. In addition, Ikaria may terminate the agreement upon 60 days’ prior written notice if Ikaria determines, in its sole judgment, that the results of the development program under the agreement do not warrant further development of products under the agreement.
In-Licensing Agreements
We have in-licensed and intend to continue to in-license development, production and marketing rights from selected research and academic institutions in order to capitalize on the capabilities and technology developed by these entities. We also seek to obtain technologies that complement and expand our existing technology base by entering into license agreements with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. When entering into in-license agreements, we generally seek to obtain unrestricted sublicense rights consistent with our primarily partner-driven strategy. We are generally obligated under these agreements to diligently pursue product development, make development milestone payments, pay royalties on any product sales and make payments upon the grant of sublicense rights. We generally insist on the right to terminate any in-license for convenience upon prior written notice to the licensor.
The scope of payments we are required to make under our in-licensing agreements is comprised of various components that are paid commensurate with the progressive development and commercialization of our drug products.
Our in-licensing agreements generally provide for the following types of payments:
|
|
•
|
Revenue sharing payments
. These are payments to be made to licensors with respect to revenue we receive from sub-licensing to third parties for further development and commercialization of our drug products. These payments are generally fixed at a percentage of the total revenues we earn from these sub-licenses.
|
|
|
•
|
Milestone payments
. These payments are generally linked to the successful achievement of milestones in the development and approval of drugs, such phases 1, 2 and 3 of clinical trials and approvals of new drug applications, or NDAs.
|
|
|
•
|
Royalty payments
. To the extent we elect to complete the development, licensing and marketing of a therapeutic candidate, we are generally required to pay our licensors royalties on the sales of the end drug product. These royalty payments are generally based on the net revenue from these sales. In certain instances, the rate of the royalty payments decrease upon the expiration of the drug’s underlying patent and its transition into a generic drug. Certain of our agreements provide that if a licensed drug product is developed and sold through a different corporate entity, the licensors may elect to receive shares in such company instead of a portion of the royalties.
|
|
|
•
|
Additional payments
. In addition to the above payments, certain of our in-license agreements provide for a one-time or periodic payment that is not linked to milestones. Periodic payments may be paid until the commercialization of the product, either by direct sales or sub-licenses to third parties. Other agreements provide for the continuation of these payments even following the commercialization of the licensed drug product.
|
The royalty and revenue sharing rates we agree to pay in our in-licensing agreements vary from case to case but in most cases range from 20% to 29% of the consideration we receive from sublicensing the applicable therapeutic candidate. We are required to pay a substantially lower percentage, generally less than 5%, if we elect to commercialize the subject therapeutic candidate independently. In addition, milestone payments are not generally payable if revenue-sharing from an out-licensing transaction is greater than any relevant payments due under our in-licensing agreements.
The following are descriptions of our in-licensing agreements associated with our therapeutic candidates under clinical development. In addition to the in-licensing agreements discussed herein, we have entered into other in-licensing arrangements in connection with our therapeutic candidates in the advanced preclinical, feasibility and EDP stages.
BL-1020 and BL-1021
In April 2004, we in-licensed the rights to BL-1020 under a research and license agreement with Bar Ilan Research and Development and Ramot. Under the research and license agreement, the licensors granted us an exclusive, worldwide, sub-licensable license to develop, manufacture, market and sell certain technology relating to conjugated anti-psychotic drugs and the uses of the technology relating thereto. In addition to BL-1020, this agreement allows us to develop two other earlier stage therapeutic candidates, BL-1021 for the treatment of neuropathic pain and a second candidate for which development has been terminated. Under the research and license agreement, we agreed to fund further research in respect of the licensed technology during a specified research period, subject to certain exceptions. In addition, we have the right to grant sublicenses for the licensed technology, subject to certain restrictions.
Under the research and license agreement, we are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop, commercialize and market the licensed technology. We pay an annual license fee of $25,000 and are required to make low, single digit royalty payments on the net sales of the licensed technology, subject to certain limitations. To date, we have paid $175,000 under the in-license agreement in connection with our obligations to make annual payments. Our royalty payment obligations are payable on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis, for the longer of 15 years from the date of first commercial sale in such country, the last expiration of any patent in such country, and the expiration of the licensed product’s “orphan drug” status in such country. If we sublicense our rights under the research and license agreement, we are required to pay the licensors a low, double digit royalty payment based on any amounts we receive from any third-party sublicensees, subject to certain limitations.
We have the right to take action in the prosecution, prevention, or termination of any patent infringement of the licensed technology. We are responsible for the expenses of any patent infringement suit that we bring, including the expenses incurred by the licensors in connection with the prosecution of such suits or the settlement thereof.
We are entitled to reimbursement from any sums recovered in such suit for all costs and expenses involved in its prosecution. After such reimbursement, we and the licensors are each entitled to a certain percentage of any remaining sums.
The research and license agreement remains in effect until the expiration of all of our royalty and sublicense revenue obligations to licensors, determined on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis, unless we terminate the license agreement earlier. We may terminate the license agreement by providing 60 days’ prior written notice to Ramot. If we materially breach any of our obligations under the agreement and fail to cure such breach within 30 days after receiving written notice of the material breach from Ramot, Ramot may terminate the agreement immediately. If either Bar Ilan Research and Development or Ramot materially breach their respective obligations under the agreement and fail to cure such breach within 30 days after receiving written notice of the material breach from us, we may terminate the agreement immediately. With respect to any termination for material breach, if the breach is not susceptible to cure within the stated period and the breaching party uses diligent, good faith efforts to cure such breach, the stated period will be extended by an additional 30 days. In addition, we and Ramot may terminate the agreement upon notice to the other upon the occurrence of certain bankruptcy events.
Termination of the agreement will result in a loss of all of our rights to the licensed technology, which will revert to the licensors. In addition, any sublicense of the licensed technology will terminate provided that, upon termination, at the request of the sublicensee, licensors are required to enter into a license agreement with the sublicensee on substantially the same terms as those contained in the sublicense agreement.
BL-1040
In January 2005, we in-licensed the rights to BL-1040 under a license agreement with B.G. Negev Technologies. Under the agreement, B.G. Negev Technologies granted us an exclusive, worldwide, sublicensable license to develop, manufacture, market and sell certain technology relating to injectable alginate biomaterials and the uses thereof. Upon execution of the agreement, we were obligated to make an initial payment and to make annual payments equal to $30,000, subject to certain conditions. To date we have paid $700,000 under the BL-1040 in-license agreement, to cover the initial fee and annual fees. We are obligated to make a low, single digit royalty payment on net sales, subject to certain limitations if we manufacture and sell products developed under the agreement on our own. We also have the right to grant sublicenses for the licensed technology and are required to pay B.G. Negev Technologies a royalty payment of 28% of the net revenues (after giving effect to withholding taxes and other deductions) we receive as consideration in connection with any sublicensing, co-marketing or co-promotion, or a permitted assignment, of BL-1040, which includes those under our licensing agreement with Ikaria. We have agreed to pay Ramot a portion of the payments we make to B.G. Negev Technologies in connection with the in-license arrangement to satisfy contractual obligations between B.G. Negev Technologies and Ramot with respect to certain intellectual property rights to the licensed technology. We have also agreed to indemnify Ramot and certain of its related parties in connection with our use of the technology we in-licensed from B.G. Negev Technologies.
Under the license agreement, we are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop the licensed technology in accordance with a specified development plan. We have paid to B.G. Negev Technologies initial payments and are required to pay an annual license fee, subject to certain exceptions. In addition, we are required to make a one-time milestone payment upon the achievement of specified milestones. We are required to make certain royalty payments on the net sales of the licensed technology, subject to certain limitations. Our royalty payment obligations are payable on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis, for the period that a valid patent on the licensed technology remains in force in such country, subject to certain exceptions for abandonment.
The license agreement remains in effect until the expiration of all of our royalty and sublicense revenue obligations to B.G. Negev Technologies, determined on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis. We may terminate the license agreement for any reason on 60 days’ prior written notice to B.G. Negev Technologies. Either party may terminate the agreement for material breach by the other party if the breaching party is unable to cure the breach within 60 days after receiving written notice of the breach from the non-breaching party. With respect to any termination for material breach, if the breach is not susceptible to cure within the stated period and the breaching party uses diligent, good faith efforts to cure such breach, the stated period will be extended by an additional 30 days. In addition, either party may terminate the agreement upon the occurrence of certain bankruptcy events.
Termination of the agreement will result in a loss of all of our rights to the licensed technology, which will revert to B.G. Negev Technologies. In addition, any sublicense of the licensed technology will terminate provided that, upon termination, at the request of the sublicensee, B.G. Negev Technologies is required to enter into a license agreement with the sublicensee on substantially the same terms as those contained in the sublicense agreement.
We have the first right to prepare, file, prosecute and maintain any patent applications and patents, in respect of the licensed technology and any part thereof, at our expense. We are required to consult with B.G. Negev Technologies regarding patent prosecution and patent maintenance. In addition, we have the right to take action in the prosecution, prevention, or termination of any patent infringement of the licensed technology. We are responsible for the expenses of any patent infringement suit that we bring, including the expenses incurred by B.G. Negev Technologies in connection with such suits. We are entitled to reimbursement from any sums recovered in such suit or in the settlement thereof for all costs and expenses involved in the prosecution of any such suit. After such reimbursement, if any funds remain, we and B.G. Negev Technologies are each entitled to a certain percentage of any remaining sums.
BL-5010
In November 2007, we in-licensed the rights to develop and commercialize BL-5010 under a license agreement with IPC. Under the agreement, IPC granted us an exclusive, worldwide, sublicensable license to develop, manufacture, market and sell certain technology relating to an acid-based formulation for the non-surgical removal of skin lesions and the uses thereof. We are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop the licensed technology in accordance with a specified development plan, including meeting certain specified diligence goals. We are required to pay to IPC a license fee, which we have paid, equal to $400,000 in the aggregate, subject to certain specifications. We are also required to make low, single digit royalty payments on the net sales of the licensed technology if we manufacture and sell it on our own, subject to certain limitations. Our royalty payment obligations are payable on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis, until the last to expire of any patent included within the licensed technology in such country. We also have the right to grant sublicenses for the licensed technology and are required to pay IPC a royalty payment in the low, double digits based on the revenues we receive as consideration in connection with any sublicensing, development, manufacture, marketing, distribution or sale of the licensed technology.
The license agreement remains in effect until the expiration of all of our license, royalty and sublicense revenue obligations to IPC, determined on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis, unless we terminate the license agreement earlier. We may terminate the license agreement for any reason on 30 days’ prior written notice. If we terminate the agreement without cause, we may be required to fund the completion of certain clinical trials of the licensed technology in an amount not to exceed $600,000. We may also terminate the license agreement upon 60 days’ prior written notice to IPC for scientific, regulatory or medical reasons which, as determined by our Scientific Advisory Board, would prevent us from continuing the development of the licensed technology pursuant to the development plan. Either party may terminate the agreement for material breach if the breach is not cured within 30 days after written notice from the non-breaching party. If the breach is not susceptible to cure within the stated period and the breaching party uses diligent, good faith efforts to cure such breach, the stated period will be extended by an additional 30 days. In addition, either party may terminate the agreement upon the occurrence of certain bankruptcy events.
Termination of the agreement will result in a loss of all of our rights to the licensed technology, which will revert to IPC. In addition, any sublicense of the licensed technology will terminate provided that, upon termination, at the request of the sublicensee, IPC is required to enter into a license agreement with the sublicensee on substantially the same terms as those contained in the sublicense agreement.
We have the first right to prepare, file, prosecute and maintain any patent applications and patents, in respect of the licensed technology and any part thereof, at our expense, provided that such patent applications and patents are registered in the name of IPC. We are required to make all future payments necessary to prosecute and maintain all patent applications and/or patents in respect of the licensed technology. We are required to consult with IPC regarding the preparation, filing and prosecution of all patent applications, and the maintenance of all patents included within the licensed patents. In addition, we have the right to take action in the prosecution, prevention, or termination of any patent infringement of the licensed patents. We are responsible for the expenses of any patent infringement suit that we bring, including the expenses incurred by IPC in connection with such suits. We are entitled to reimbursement from any sums recovered in such suit for all costs and expenses involved in the prosecution of any such suit. After such reimbursement, we and IPC are each entitled to a certain percentage of any remaining sums.
BL-7040
In June 2011, we in-licensed the rights to BL-7040 under a license agreement with Yissum. Under the agreement, Yissum granted us an exclusive, worldwide, sublicensable license to develop, have developed, manufacture, have manufactured, use, market, distribute, export, import and/or sell products and/or processes that comprise, contain or incorporate certain technology relating to a novel oligonucleotide. Notwithstanding the exclusive license, Yissum and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem retained the right to make non-commercial, academic use of the technology at the Hebrew University, including academic research sponsored by third parties that does not conflict or interfere with the license. In addition, Yissum may grant licenses to third party academic or research institutions for non-commercial, academic research and teaching purposes provided that any results from such efforts shall be the sole property of Yissum and exclusively licensed to us under the agreement. Under the license agreement, we are responsible for, and are required to exert, reasonable commercial efforts to carry out the development, regulatory, manufacturing and marketing work necessary to develop and commercialize products under the agreement in accordance with a specified development plan.
Upon execution of the agreement, we were obligated to make a $30,000 initial payment to Yissum for all previous documented expenses and costs directly incurred by Yissum relating to the registration and maintenance of the licensed patents. We are obligated under the agreement to make a license fee payable as follows: $150,000 upon completion of the dosing of the last patient to be enrolled in the first phase II clinical trial with respect to a product under the agreement; and $450,000 upon enrollment of the first patient in a phase III clinical trial of a product under the agreement. We are obligated to make a 4.5% royalty payment on net sales of products, subject to certain limitations, if we manufacture and sell products developed under the agreement on our own. These royalties are reduced to 2% with respect to sales in any country after the expiration in such country of the last to expire patent with a valid claim. If we grant sublicenses of our rights in the licensed technology, we are required to pay Yissum a royalty payment of either 28% or 29.5% of the consideration we receive in connection with the grant of a sublicense or option to obtain a sublicense, subject to certain criteria. In any event, however, the consideration that we are required to actually pay to Yissum as a result of royalties or other sales related consideration that we receive from sublicenses shall not be less than 3.5% of the net sales which form the basis for computation of the royalties paid to us by such sublicensees. In addition, if we sublicense or assign the rights to the licensed technology and/or development results under the agreement to a company-owned entity established for the sole purpose of commercializing and developing the licensed technology and the development results, Yissum may elect to receive 12.5% of the entity’s ordinary shares and reduced royalties and sublicense fees equal to 1.875% and 12.5%, respectively.
In addition, we are required, upon the completion of the development of any product under the agreement, to use commercially reasonable efforts to maximize net sales of the product on a regular and consistent basis.
Royalties are payable under the agreement beginning upon the first commercial sale of a product under the agreement and expires on a country-by-country basis on the occurrence of the later of (a) the expiration in such country of the last-to-expire patent with a valid claim and (b) the elapse of 15 years from the date of the first commercial sale of a product under the agreement in the country. Either we or Yissum may terminate the agreement immediately upon written notice to the other relating to bankruptcy and insolvency matters, upon 60 days’ written notice of a material breach, if such breach is not capable of but is not cured, and upon 90 days with notice of a non-material breach, is such breach is not cured. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a party is entitled to an extra 30 days to cure a breach if the breach is not capable of cure during the stated period if the breaching party uses diligent good faith efforts to cure the breach. In addition, Yissum may terminate the agreement (a) immediately if an attachment is made over our assets and/or execution proceedings are taken against us and are not set aside within 60 days of the date of attachment or proceedings, as applicable and (b) if we fail to pay, in full, the research fee under a related sponsored research agreement upon 30 days’ notice, subject to certain exceptions. We may terminate the license agreement for any reason on 30 days’ prior written notice to Yissum.
Termination of the agreement will result in the termination of the license and, accordingly, the licensed technology and all rights included therein shall revert to Yissum. All sublicenses under the agreement are required to provide that, upon termination of the license, in whole or in part, that is, with respect to any country, the sublicense shall terminate; provided that as long as the sublicensee is not in breach of the sublicense agreement at such time to the extent that we would have the right to terminate the sublicense, Yissum shall be required to effect one of the two following acts: either (a) enter into a new agreement with the sublicensee upon substantially the same terms as the sublicense as long as the terms are amended such that Yissum is not subject to any obligation or liability which are not included in, or in greater scope than, Yissum’s obligations or liabilities under the license agreement; or (b) require the sublicensee to enter into a new license agreement on substantially the same terms and conditions as those contained in the license agreement.
We have the first right to prepare, file, prosecute and maintain any patent applications and patents in respect of the licensed technology and any part thereof, at our expense, subject to certain conditions. We are required to file each licensed patent application at least in the United States, Europe and Japan. We are also required to take action, in reasonable commercial circumstances and after consultation with patent counsel, in the prosecution, prevention or termination of any infringement of patents licensed under the agreement. We are responsible for the expenses of any patent infringement suit that we bring, including the expenses incurred by Yissum in connection with such suits. We are entitled to reimbursement from any awards or settlements recovered in such suit or in the settlement thereof for all costs and expenses involved in the prosecution of any such suit. If we elect not to pursue any action in connection with infringement and Yissum in good faith disagrees with us that it is in the mutual best interest of both parties not to pursue any such action, then, at our election, we may either allow Yissum to pursue such actions, at Yissum’s expense, or pay Yissum the royalties that Yissum would otherwise receive from us attributable to lost sales resulting from such alleged infringement.
Intellectual Property
Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain proprietary protection for our therapeutic candidates, technology and know-how, to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others and to prevent others from infringing our proprietary rights. Our policy is to seek to protect our proprietary position by, among other methods, filing U.S. and foreign patent applications related to our proprietary technology, inventions and improvements that are important to the development of our business. We also rely on trade secrets, know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our proprietary position.
Patents
. As of September 30, 2011, we owned or exclusively licensed for uses within our field of business 15 patent families that, collectively contain over 21 issued patents and over 67 pending patent applications relating to our five clinical candidates. We are also pursuing patent protection for other drug candidates in our pipeline. Patents related to our therapeutic candidates may provide future competitive advantages by providing exclusivity related to the composition of matter, formulation, and method of administration of the applicable compounds and could materially improve the value of our therapeutic candidates. The patent positions for our five leading therapeutic candidates are described below and include both issued patents and pending patent applications we
exclusively license. We vigorously defend our intellectual property to preserve our rights and gain the benefit of our investment.
|
|
•
|
With respect to BL-1020, we have an exclusive license to a patent family that covers the molecule that is the active ingredient of our proprietary anti-psychotic drug and methods of its use for the treatment of, e.g., schizophrenia. Patents of this family have been granted or received notice of allowance in the United States, Israel, Europe, Australia, Japan, China, India and South Korea. The patents and any patents to issue in the future based on pending patent applications in this family will expire, without extension, beginning in September 2022. In addition, we have an exclusive license to a patent family claiming the use of BL-1020 for improving cognitive functions. Any patents to issue in the future based on this international patent application will expire, without extension, in 2030. In addition we have an exclusive license to a patent family claiming a novel crystalline form of BL-1020. Any patents to issue in the future based on this international patent application will expire, without extension, in 2031.
|
|
|
•
|
With respect to BL-1040, we have an exclusive license to a patent family directed to the BL-1040 composition and methods of its use for the treatment of myocardial infarction. Patents of this family have been granted or received notice of allowance in the USA, India, China and Australia. Additional member patent applications are pending in Israel, Europe, Japan, Canada, and South Korea. The US patent will expire in 2026. Other issued patents and any patents to issue in the future based on pending patent applications in these families will expire, without an extension, in 2024.
|
|
|
•
|
With respect to BL-5010, we have an exclusive license to a patent family directed to the BL-5010 composition and its use for the removal and preservation of skin lesions. Patents and patent applications corresponding to the international patent application have been granted or are pending in the United States, Israel and Europe. The issued patents and any patents to issue in the future based on pending patent applications in these families will expire beginning in the end of 2021.
|
|
|
•
|
With respect to BL-1021, we have an exclusive license to a patent family that claims the molecule that is the active ingredient of our proprietary drug. Patents and patent applications corresponding to the international patent application have been granted or are pending in the United States, Israel, Europe, Australia, Japan, Canada, China, India, South Korea and Mexico. The patents and any patents to issue in the future based on pending patent applications in this family will expire, without extension, beginning in 2022. We also have an exclusive license to a patent family claiming the use of BL-1021 for the treatment of pain. Patents and patent applications corresponding to the international patent application are pending in the United States, Israel, Europe, Australia, Japan, Canada, China, India, South Korea and Mexico. The patents and any patents to issue in the future based on pending patent applications in this family will expire, without extension, beginning in 2027.
|
|
|
•
|
With respect to BL-7040, we have an exclusive license to a patent family that relates to the molecule that is the active ingredient of our proprietary drug. Patents and patent applications corresponding to the international patent application have been granted or are pending in the United States, Israel, Europe, Japan, Canada, New Zealand and India. The patents and any patents to issue in the future based on pending patent applications in this family will expire, without extension, beginning in 2021. We also have an exclusive license to a patent family claiming the use of BL-7040 for the treatment of inflammation such as IBD. Patents and patent applications corresponding to the international patent application are pending in the United States, Europe and Japan. The patents and any patents to issue in the future based on pending patent applications in this family will expire, without extension, beginning in 2023.
|
The patent positions of companies like ours are generally uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. Our ability to maintain and solidify our proprietary position for our technology will depend on our success in obtaining effective claims and enforcing those claims once granted. We do not know whether any of our patent applications or those patent applications that we license will result in the issuance of any patents. Our issued patents and those that may issue in the future, or those licensed to us, may be challenged, narrowed, circumvented or found to be invalid or unenforceable, which could limit our ability to stop competitors from marketing related products or the length of term of patent protection that we may have for our products. Neither we nor our licensors can be certain that we were the first to invent the inventions claimed in our owned or licensed patents or patent applications. In addition, our competitors may independently develop similar technologies or duplicate any technology developed by us, and the rights granted under any issued patents may not provide us with any meaningful competitive advantages against these competitors. Furthermore, because of the extensive time required for development, testing and regulatory review of a potential product, it is possible that, before any of our products can be commercialized, any related patent may expire or remain in force for only a short period following commercialization, thereby reducing any advantage of the patent.
Trade Secrets.
We may rely, in some circumstances, on trade secrets to protect our technology. However, trade secrets can be difficult to protect. We seek to protect our proprietary technology and processes, in part, by confidentiality agreements and assignment of inventions agreements with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and contractors. We also seek to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our data and trade secrets by maintaining physical security of our premises and physical and electronic security of our information technology systems. While we have confidence in these individuals, organizations and systems, such agreements or security measures may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors.
Scientific Advisory Board
Our Scientific Advisory Board, which consists of a number of leading scientists and physicians, plays an active role in the evaluation of in-licensing opportunities, the development of our pipeline, and in the rejection of in-licensing opportunities that do not meet our licensing criteria. We also seek advice from our Scientific Advisory Board on scientific and medical matters generally. Our Scientific Advisory Board meets approximately every six weeks to, among other things:
|
|
•
|
screen all potential in-licensing and current therapeutic candidates;
|
|
|
•
|
oversee our research and development programs; and
|
|
|
•
|
address specific scientific and technical issues relevant to our business.
|
The following table sets forth information for our Scientific Advisory Board members.
|
Name
|
Position/Institutional Affiliation
|
|
|
J. Aaron Ciechanover, M.D., Ph.D.
|
Professor Ciechanover is a Nobel Prize laureate in Chemistry (2004) and a recipient of the Israel Prize (2000) in Biological Research and the prestigious Lasker Award (2000). Professor Ciechanover is the Director of the Rappaport Family Institute for Research in the medical sciences and is a professor of biochemistry at the Technion — Israel Institute of Technology.
|
|
|
Aliza Eshkol, Ph.D.
|
Dr. Eshkol is Vice President for Scientific Affairs, Serono International SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
|
|
|
David Ladkani, M.D.
|
Dr. Ladkani is the Chief Scientific Officer, Global Products Division, of Teva. Dr. Ladkani has received the prestigious Rothschild Award for innovation, and is widely published in the field of multiple sclerosis treatments.
|
|
|
Yaakov Naparstek, M.D.
|
Professor Naparstek is the Chairman of Medicine of Hadassah University Hospital. His main research interests are in the field of autoimmunity, systemic lupus erythematosus and autoimmune arthritis.
|
|
|
Moshe Phillip, M.D.
|
Professor Phillip has been our Vice President of Medical Affairs and Senior Clinical Advisor and a member of our Scientific Advisory Board since 2004. Professor Phillip is the Director of the Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes of the Israel National Center for Childhood Diabetes at Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel and the Vice Dean for Research and Development at the Sackler School of Medical Education at Tel Aviv University.
|
|
|
Itamar Shalit, M.D.
|
Professor Shalit is the Director of the Pediatric Infectious Disease Unit at the Schneider Children’s Medical Center in Israel. Dr. Shalit is the author of over 70 publications in scientific journals and chapters in textbooks and currently serves as the Chairman of the Israeli Society for Infectious Diseases.
|
|
|
Yosef Yarden, Ph.D.
|
Professor Yarden is the Dean of the Feinberg Graduate School of the Weizmann Institute of Science. He serves on numerous national and international boards and the scientific advisory committees of several organizations, both academic and commercial, including serving as a Council Member of the European Association for Cancer Research.
|
Manufacturing
Our laboratories, which are located in our headquarters in Jerusalem, Israel, are compliant with both current good manufacturing practices, or cGMP, and Good Laboratory Practices, or GLP, and allow us to manufacture therapeutic supplies for our current clinical trials. See “Business — Property, Plant and Equipment.” If we decide to perform any phase 3 clinical trial with respect to, or commercialize, any therapeutic candidate on our own, we anticipate that we will rely on third parties to produce the therapeutic supplies. We have limited personnel with experience in drug or medical device manufacturing and we lack the resources and capabilities to manufacture any of our therapeutic candidates on a commercial scale.
Under our out-licensing agreement with Ikaria with regard to BL-1040, we have the option to manufacture at least 20% of BL-1040 products pursuant to the terms of a supply agreement to be negotiated in good faith with Ikaria. See “Business — Material Agreements — Ikaria Agreement.” There can be no assurance that our therapeutic candidates, if approved, can be manufactured in sufficient commercial quantities, in compliance with regulatory requirements and at an acceptable cost. We and our contract manufacturers are, and will be, subject to extensive governmental regulation in connection with the manufacture of any pharmaceutical products or medical devices. We and our contract manufacturers must ensure that all of the processes, methods and equipment are compliant with cGMP, for drugs or QSR for devices on an ongoing basis, mandated by the FDA and other regulatory authorities, and conduct extensive audits of vendors, contract laboratories and suppliers.
Contract Research Organizations
We outsource certain preclinical and clinical development activities to contract research organizations, or CROs, which meet FDA or European Medicines Agency regulatory standards. We create and implement the drug development plans and, during the preclinical and clinical phases of development, manage the CROs according to the specific requirements of the therapeutic candidate under development.
Competition
The pharmaceutical, medical device and biotechnology industries are intensely competitive. Several of our therapeutic candidates, if commercialized, would compete with existing drugs and therapies. In addition, there are many pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, medical device companies public and private universities, government agencies and research organizations actively engaged in research and development of products targeting the same markets as our therapeutic candidates. Many of these organizations have substantially greater financial, technical, manufacturing and marketing resources than we have. Our competitors may also be able to use alternative technologies that do not infringe upon our patents to formulate the active materials in our therapeutic candidates. They may, therefore, bring to market products that are able to compete with our candidates, or other products that we may develop in the future.
BL-1020
If approved, BL-1020 will compete with currently marketed atypical anti-psychotics from Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly and Company, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc. and others, as well as with generic brands of typical and atypical anti-psychotics. We are also aware of a number of potentially competitive compounds under development including: Cariprazine, which is being developed by Forest Laboratories, Inc. and Gedeon Richter; Bifeprunox, which is being developed by Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lurasidone, which is being developed by Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd.; LY2140023, which is being developed by Eli Lilly; LU3130, which is being developed by Lundbeck; RG1678, which is being developed by Roche and Chugai; and Vyvanse, which is being developed by Shire. None of these anti-psychotics are indicated to improve cognition.
BL-1040
We are not aware of any marketed products for the prevention of cardiac remodeling following an AMI that, like BL-1040, are injectable and form a protective scaffold that supports the heart muscle during recovery and repair. BL-1040 faces competition from a number of therapies aimed at preventing cardiac remodeling and subsequent congestive heart failure (CHF) in different ways. Other treatments for cardiac remodeling include BioHeart, Inc.’s MyoCell® implantation procedure, Paracor Medical, Inc.’s HeartNet
TM
and Acorn Cardiovascular, Inc.’s CorCap
TM
device. These devices are indicated for different patient populations than BL-1040 and require surgery. For example, CorCap
TM
is indicated for patients suffering from congestive heart failure (CHF) and requires surgery to apply the device.
BL-5010
There are a variety of approved destructive and non-destructive treatments for skin lesions. Surgery is currently the most common approved non-destructive treatment for skin lesions but is invasive and painful, and generally results in cosmetically undesirable outcomes. Destructive treatments are associated with pain. Destructive treatments include cryotherapy, laser therapy, Electrodessication and several cream-based treatments including Imiquimod, Disclofenac sodium, 5-Fluorouracil, Picato (Leo Pharma) and Metvix® (Galderma Pharma SA). Picato involves repeated administrations for 2-3 days. Metvix involves exposure of the skin lesion to red light after the application of the cream. Both have been approved in many countries. BL-5010 requires a single application and does not require the use of any equipment.
BL-1021
If approved, BL-1021 will compete with currently marketed anticonvulsants, antidepressants and narcotic analgesics. The neuropathic pain market leaders are anticonvulsants, such as Lyrica (Pregabalin, Pfizer) and the generic Gabapentin, together with off-label brands. Additional market leaders are Cymbalta (duloxetine; Eli Lilly/Shionogi), Lidoderm (5% lidocaine patch; Endo/Grünenthal), Qutenza (8% capsaicin patch; NeurogesX/Astellas) and Gralise (extended-release Gabapentin; Depomed). We are also aware of a number of potentially competitive compounds under development including Nucynta ER (Tapentadol ER; Grünenthal/Johnson & Johnson), DM-1796 (Gabapentin GR; Depomed/Abbott), Horizant (Gabapentin enacarbil; XenoPort/GlaxoSmithKline), Eladur (bupivacaine patch; Durect/King/Pfizer), AmiKet (amitriptyline and ketamine; EpiCept), AVP-923 (dextromethorphan hydrobromide/quinidine sulfate; IriSys/Avanir) and Ralfinamide (Newron). None of these compounds is considered revolutionary in terms of fulfilling all the critical clinical factors such as high efficacy, improved dosing regimen and improvement of related side effects.
BL-7040
If approved, BL-7040 will compete with currently marketed steroids, immunomodulators and anti-TNFs (tumor necrosis factors). The IBD market leaders are anti-TNFs such as Remicade (infliximab, Janssen Biotech, Inc., a Johnson & Johnson company, Merck & Co. and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma) and Humira (adalimumab, Abbott Laboratories and Eisai Co.), in addition to generic brands of mesalazine, a 5-aminosalicylate. Additional market leaders are Cimzia (certolizumab, UCB, Inc.), an anti-TNF, and Tysabri (natalizumab, Biogen Inc.), an integrin inhibitor. We are also aware of a number of potentially competitive compounds under development including Simponi (golimumab, Janssen Biotech, Inc., Merck & Co. and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma), a TNF inhibitor, and Budesonide MMX (Cosmo Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Santarus, Inc.).
Insurance
We maintain insurance for our offices and laboratory in Israel. Our insurance program covers approximately $3.8 million of equipment, stock and lease improvements against risk of fire, lightning, natural perils and burglary and $1.5 million of consequential damages. In addition, we maintain the following insurance: employer liability with coverage of approximately $10.0 million; third party liability with coverage of approximately $5.0 million; all risk coverage of approximately $1.5 million for electronic equipment and boiler and machinery insurance for laboratory refrigerators; and directors and officers liability with coverage of $20.0 million.
We procure cargo marine coverage when we ship substances for our clinical studies. Such insurance is custom-fit to the special requirements of the applicable shipment, such as temperature and/or climate sensitivity. If required, we insure the substances to the extent they are stored in central depots and at clinical sites.
We believe that the amounts of our insurance policies are adequate and customary for a business of our kind. However, because of the nature of our business, we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain insurance on a commercially reasonable basis or at all, or that any future claims will not exceed our insurance coverage.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to various environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing air emissions, water and wastewater discharges, noise emissions, the use, management and disposal of hazardous, radioactive and biological materials and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. We believe that our business, operations and facilities are being operated in compliance in all material respects with applicable environmental and health and safety laws and regulations. Based on information currently available to us, we do not expect environmental costs and contingencies to have a material adverse effect on us. The operation of our facilities, however, entails risks in these areas. Significant expenditures could be required in the future if we are required to comply with new or more stringent environmental or health and safety laws, regulations or requirements. See “Business — Government Regulation — Israel Ministry of Environment — Toxin Permit.”
GOVERNMENT
REGULATION AND FUNDING
We operate in a highly controlled regulatory environment. Stringent regulations establish requirements relating to analytical, toxicological and clinical standards and protocols in respect of the testing of pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Regulations also cover research, development, manufacturing and reporting procedures, both pre- and post-approval. In many markets, especially in Europe, marketing and pricing strategies are subject to national legislation or administrative practices that include requirements to demonstrate not only the quality, safety and efficacy of a new product, but also its cost-effectiveness relating to other treatment options. Failure to comply with regulations can result in stringent sanctions, including product recalls, withdrawal of approvals, seizure of products and criminal prosecution.
Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of our therapeutic candidates, we or our licensees must demonstrate through preclinical studies and clinical trials that our therapeutic candidates are safe and effective. Historically, the results from preclinical studies and early clinical trials often have not accurately predicted results of later clinical trials. In addition, a number of pharmaceutical products have shown promising results in clinical trials but subsequently failed to establish sufficient safety and efficacy results to obtain necessary regulatory approvals. We have incurred and will continue to incur substantial expense for, and devote a significant amount of time to, preclinical studies and clinical trials. Many factors can delay the commencement and rate of completion of clinical trials, including the inability to recruit patients at the expected rate, the inability to follow patients adequately after treatment, the failure to manufacture sufficient quantities of materials used for clinical trials, and the emergence of unforeseen safety issues and governmental and regulatory delays. If a therapeutic candidate fails to demonstrate safety and efficacy in clinical trials, this failure may delay development of other therapeutic candidates and hinder our ability to conduct related preclinical studies and clinical trials. Additionally, as a result of these failures, we may also be unable to find additional licensees or obtain additional financing.
Governmental authorities in all major markets require that a new pharmaceutical product or medical device be approved or exempted from approval before it is marketed, and have established high standards for technical appraisal, which can result in an expensive and lengthy approval process. The time to obtain approval varies by country. In the past, it generally took from six months to four years from the application date, depending upon the quality of the results produced, the degree of control exercised by the regulatory authority, the efficiency of the review procedure and the nature of the product. Some products are never approved. In recent years, there has been a trend towards shorter regulatory review times in the United States as well as certain European countries, despite increased regulation and higher quality, safety and efficacy standards.
Historically, different requirements by different countries’ regulatory authorities have influenced the submission of applications. However, the past 10 years have shown a gradual trend toward harmonization of drug and medical device approval standards, starting in individual territories in Europe and then in the European Union as a whole, in Japan, and in the United States under the aegis of the International Conference on Harmonization, or ICH. In many cases, compliance with ICH standards can help avoid duplication of non-clinical and clinical trials and enable companies to use the same basis for submissions to each of the respective regulatory authorities. The adoption of the Common Technical Document format by the ICH has greatly facilitated use of a single regulatory submission for seeking approval in the ICH regions and certain other countries such as Canada and Australia.
A summary of the U.S., E.U. and Israeli regulatory process follows below.
United States
In the United States, drugs are subject to rigorous regulation by the FDA. The U.S. Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, and other federal and state statutes and regulations govern, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, storage, record-keeping, packaging, labeling, adverse event reporting, advertising, promotion, marketing, distribution and import and export of pharmaceutical products. Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements may subject us to a variety of administrative or judicially imposed sanctions and/or prevent us from obtaining or maintaining required approvals or to market drugs. Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. requirements may subject us to stringent administrative or judicial sanctions, such as agency refusal to approve pending applications, warning letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions or criminal prosecution.
Unless a drug is exempt from the new drug application process, the steps required before a drug may be marketed in the United States include:
|
|
•
|
preclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies;
|
|
|
•
|
submission to the FDA of a request for an investigational new drug, or IND, to conduct human clinical testing;
|
|
|
•
|
adequate and well controlled clinical trials to determine the safety and efficacy of the drug for each indication;
|
|
|
•
|
submission to the FDA of a new drug application, or NDA;
|
|
|
•
|
a potential public hearing of an outside advisory committee to discuss the application;
|
|
|
•
|
satisfactory completion of an FDA inspection of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the drug is manufactured; and
|
|
|
•
|
FDA review and approval of the NDA.
|
Preclinical studies include laboratory evaluation of product chemistry, toxicity and formulation, as well as animal studies. For studies conducted in the United States, and certain studies carried out outside the United States, we submit the results of the preclinical studies, together with manufacturing information and analytical results, to the FDA as part of an IND, which must become effective before we may commence human clinical trials. An IND will automatically become effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless before that time the FDA raises concerns or questions about issues such as the conduct of the trials as outlined in the IND. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding FDA concerns or questions before clinical trials can proceed. Submission of an IND does not always result in the FDA allowing clinical trials to commence and the FDA may halt a clinical trial if unexpected safety issues surface or the study is not being conducted in compliance with applicable requirements.
The FDA may refuse to accept an IND for review if applicable regulatory requirements are not met. Moreover, the FDA may delay or prevent the start of clinical trials if the manufacturing of the test drugs fails to meet cGMP requirements or the clinical trials are not adequately designed. Such government regulation may delay or prevent the study and marketing of potential products for a considerable time period and may impose costly procedures upon a manufacturer’s activities. In addition, the FDA may, at any time, impose a clinical hold on ongoing clinical trials. If the FDA imposes a clinical hold, clinical trials cannot continue without FDA authorization and then only under terms authorized by the FDA.
Success in early-stage clinical trials does not assure success in later-stage clinical trials. Results obtained from clinical activities are not always conclusive and may be susceptible to varying interpretations that could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. Even if a therapeutic candidate receives regulatory approval, later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product may result in restrictions on the product or even withdrawal of marketing approval for the product.
Clinical Trials
Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational drug to people under the supervision of qualified investigators. We conduct clinical trials under protocols detailing the trial objectives, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety, and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. We must submit each protocol to the FDA as part of the IND.
We conduct clinical trials typically in three sequential phases, but the phases may overlap or be combined. An institutional review board, or IRB, must review and approve each trial before it can begin. Phase 1 includes the initial administration of a tested drug to a small number of humans. These trials are closely monitored and may be conducted in patients, but are usually conducted in healthy volunteer subjects. These trials are designed to determine the metabolic and pharmacologic actions of the drug in humans and the side effects associated with increasing doses as well as, if possible, to gain early evidence on effectiveness. Phase 2 usually involves trials in a limited patient population to evaluate dosage tolerance and appropriate dosage, identify possible adverse effects and safety risks and preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the drug for specific indications. Phase 3 trials are large trials used to further evaluate clinical efficacy and test further for safety by using the drug in its final form in an expanded patient population. There can be no assurance that we or our licensees will successfully complete phase 1, phase 2 or phase 3 testing with respect to any therapeutic candidate within any specified period of time, if at all. Furthermore, clinical trials may be suspended at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the subjects or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. We and our licensees perform preclinical and clinical testing outside of the United States. The acceptability of the results of our preclinical and clinical testing by the FDA will be dependent upon adherence to applicable U.S. and foreign standards and requirements, including good laboratory practices, or GLP, Good Clinical Practices, or GCP, and the Declaration of Helsinki for protection of human subjects. Additionally, the FDA may require at least one pivotal clinical study to be conducted in the United States, in order to take into account medical practice and ethnic diversity in the United States.
NDAs and BLAs
After successful completion of the required clinical testing, a New Drug Application, or NDA, or in the case of certain biological products a Biological Product Application, or BLA, is prepared and submitted to the FDA. FDA approval of the NDA or BLA is required before product marketing may begin in the United States. The NDA/BLA must include the preclinical and clinical testing results and a compilation of detailed information relating to the product’s pharmacology, toxicology, chemistry, manufacture and manufacturing controls. In certain cases, an application for marketing approval may include information regarding the safety and efficacy of a proposed drug that comes from trials not conducted by, or for, the applicant and for which trials the applicant has not obtained a specific right to reference. Such an application, known as a 505(b)(2) NDA, is permitted for new drug products that incorporate previously approved active ingredients, even if the proposed new drug incorporates an approved active ingredient in a novel formulation or for a new indication. A 505(b)(2) type application is not available for drugs subject to BLAs. As interpreted by the FDA, Section 505(b)(2) also permits the FDA to rely for such approvals on literature or on a finding by the FDA of safety and/or efficacy for a previously approved drug product. Under this interpretation, a 505(b)(2) NDA for changes to a previously approved drug product may rely on the FDA’s finding of safety and efficacy of the previously approved product coupled with new clinical data and information needed by the FDA to support the change. NDAs submitted under 505(b)(2) are potentially subject to patent and non-patent exclusivity provisions which can block effective approval of the 505(b)(2) application until the applicable exclusivities have expired, which in the case of patents may be several years. The cost of preparing and submitting an NDA may be substantial. Under U.S. federal law, the submission of NDAs, including 505(b)(2) NDAs, is generally subject to substantial application user fees, and the manufacturer and/or sponsor under an NDA approved by the FDA is also subject to annual product and establishment user fees. These fees are typically increased annually. Currently, there are no fees assessed for an Abbreviated New Drug Application, or ANDA.
The FDA has 60 days from its receipt of an NDA to determine whether the application will be accepted for filing based on the FDA threshold determination that the NDA is sufficiently complete to permit substantive review. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth review of the NDA. Under U.S. federal law, the FDA has agreed to certain performance goals in the review of NDAs. Most such applications for non-priority drug products are to be reviewed within 10 months. The review process may be significantly extended by FDA requests for additional information or clarification. The FDA may also refer applications to an advisory committee, typically a panel that includes clinicians and other experts, for review, evaluation and a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved. This often, but not exclusively, occurs for novel drug products or drug products that present difficult questions of safety or efficacy. The FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory committee.
Before approving an application, the FDA typically will inspect the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured. The FDA will not approve the application unless the FDA determines that the product is manufactured in substantial compliance with GMPs. If the FDA determines that the NDA or BLA is supported by adequate data and information, the FDA may issue an approval letter, or, in some cases, when the FDA desires some additional data or information an approvable letter. An approvable letter generally contains a statement of specific conditions that must be met to secure final approval of the application. Upon compliance with the conditions stated in the approvable letter, the FDA will typically issue an approval letter. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the drug with specific prescribing information for specific indications. As a condition of approval, the FDA may require additional trials or post-approval testing and surveillance to monitor the drug’s safety or efficacy, the adoption of risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, and may impose other conditions, including labeling and marketing restrictions on the use of the drug, which can materially affect its potential market and profitability. Once granted, product approvals may be withdrawn if compliance with regulatory standards for manufacturing and quality control are not maintained or if additional safety problems are identified following initial marketing.
If the FDA’s evaluation of the NDA or BLA submission or manufacturing processes and facilities is not favorable, the FDA may refuse to approve the NDA or BLA and may issue a not approvable letter. The not approvable letter outlines major deficiencies in the submission and often requires substantial additional testing or information for the FDA to reconsider the application. Even with submission of this additional information, the FDA ultimately may decide that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval.
The Pediatric Research Equity Act, or PREA, requires NDAs (or NDA supplements) for a new active ingredient, new indication, new dosage form, new dosing regimen or new route of administration to contain results assessing the safety and efficacy for the claimed indication in all relevant pediatric subpopulations. Data to support dosing and administration also must be provided for each pediatric subpopulation for which the drug is safe and effective. The FDA may grant deferrals for the submission of results or full or partial waivers from the PREA requirements (for example, if the product is ready for approval in adults before pediatric studies are complete, if additional safety data is needed, among others).
Post-Marketing Requirements
Once an NDA or BLA is approved, the drug sponsor will be subject to certain post-approval requirements, including requirements for adverse event reporting, submission of periodic reports, manufacturing, labeling, packaging, advertising, promotion, distribution, record-keeping and other requirements. For example, the approval may be subject to limitations on the uses for which the product may be marketed or conditions of approval, or contain requirements for costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product or require the adoption of risk evaluation and mitigation strategies. In addition, the FDA requires the reporting of any adverse effects observed after the approval or marketing of a therapeutic candidate and such events could result in limitations on the use of such approved product or its withdrawal from the marketplace. Also, some types of changes to the approved product, such as manufacturing changes and labeling claims, are subject to further FDA review and approval. Additionally, the FDA strictly regulates the promotional claims that may be made about prescription drug products. In particular, the FDA requires substantiation of any claims of superiority of one product over another including, in many cases, requirements that such claims be proven by adequate and well controlled head-to-head clinical trials. To the extent that market acceptance of our therapeutic candidates may depend on their superiority over existing products, any restriction on our ability to advertise or otherwise promote claims of superiority, or any requirements to conduct additional expensive clinical trials to provide proof of such claims, could negatively affect the sales of our therapeutic candidates and our costs.
Generic Competition
Once an NDA, including a 505(b)(2) NDA, is approved, the product covered thereby becomes a “listed drug” which can, in turn, be cited by potential competitors in support of approval of an ANDA, which relies on bioequivalence studies that compare the generic drug to a reference listed drug to support approval. Currently, ANDAs are not eligible for drugs covered by BLAs. Specifically, a generic drug that is the subject of an ANDA must be bioequivalent and have the same active ingredient(s), route of administration, dosage form, and strength, as well as the same labeling, with certain exceptions, as the listed drug. If the FDA deems that any of these requirements are not met, additional results may be necessary to seek approval.
ANDA applicants do not have to conduct extensive clinical trials to prove the safety or efficacy of the drug product. Rather, they are required to show that their drug is pharmaceutically equivalent to the innovator’s drug and also conduct “bioequivalence” testing to show that the rate and extent by which the ANDA applicant’s drug is absorbed does not differ significantly from the innovator product. Bioequivalence tests are typically in vivo studies in humans but they are smaller and less costly than the types of phase 3 trials required to obtain initial approval of a new drug. Drugs approved in this way are commonly referred to as “generic equivalents” to the listed drug, are listed as such by the FDA, and can often be substituted by pharmacists under prescriptions written for the original listed drug.
With respect to NDAs, U.S. federal law provides for a period of three years of non-patent market exclusivity following the approval of a listed drug that contains previously approved active ingredients but is approved in a new dosage, dosage form, route of administration or combination, or for a new use, the approval of which was required to be supported by new clinical trials, other than bioavailability studies, conducted by or for the sponsor. During this three-year period the FDA cannot grant effective approval of an ANDA or a 505(b)(2) NDA for the same conditions of approval under which the NDA was approved.
U.S. federal law also provides a period of five years following approval of a new chemical entity that is a drug containing no previously approved active ingredients, during which ANDAs for generic versions of such drugs, as well as 505(b)(2) NDAs, cannot be submitted unless the submission contains a certification that the listed patent is invalid or will not be infringed, in which case the submission may be made four years following the original product approval. If an ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA applicant certifies that it believes one or more listed patents is invalid or not infringed, it is required to provide notice of its filing to the NDA sponsor and the patent holder. If the patent holder or exclusive patent licensee then initiates a suit for patent infringement against the ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA sponsor within 45 days of receipt of the notice, the FDA cannot grant effective approval of the ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA until either 30 months have passed or there has been a court decision holding that the patents in question are invalid or not infringed. If an infringement action is not brought within 45 days, the ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA applicant may bring a declaratory judgment action to determine patent issues prior to marketing. If the ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA applicant certifies as to the date on which the listed patents will expire, then the FDA cannot grant effective approval of the ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA until those patents expire. The first ANDA(s) submitting substantially complete application(s) certifying that listed patents for a particular product are invalid or not infringed may qualify for a period of 180 days of marketing exclusivity, starting from the date of the first commercial marketing of the drug by the applicant, during which subsequently submitted ANDAs cannot be granted effective approval. The first ANDA applicant can forfeit its exclusivity under certain circumstances; for example, if it fails to market its product or meet other regulatory requirements within specified time periods.
From time to time, including presently, legislation is drafted and introduced in the U.S. Congress that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing the approval, manufacturing and marketing of drug products. In addition, FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the agency in ways that may significantly affect our business and our therapeutic candidates. It is impossible to predict whether legislative changes will be enacted, or FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations changed, or what the impact of such changes, if any, may be.
FDA Approval or Clearance of Medical Devices
In the United States, medical devices are subject to varying degrees of regulatory control and are classified in one of three classes depending on the controls the FDA determines necessary to reasonably ensure their safety and efficacy:
|
|
•
|
Class I: general controls, such as labeling and adherence to Quality System Regulations, or QSRs;
|
|
|
•
|
Class II: general controls, pre-market notification (510(k)), and specific controls such as performance standards, patient registries, and postmarket surveillance; and
|
|
|
•
|
Class III: general controls and approval of a PMA.
|
A PMA application must provide a demonstration of safety and effectiveness, which generally requires extensive preclinical and clinical trial data. Information about the device and its components, device design, manufacturing and labeling, among other information, must also be included in the PMA. As part of the PMA review, the FDA will typically inspect the manufacturer’s facilities for compliance with QSR requirements, which govern testing, control, documentation and other aspects of quality assurance with respect to manufacturing. During the review period, an FDA advisory committee, typically a panel of clinicians, is likely to be convened to review the application and recommend to the FDA whether, or upon what conditions, the device should be approved. The FDA is not bound by the advisory panel decision, but the FDA often follows the panel’s recommendation. If the FDA finds the information satisfactory, it will approve the PMA. The PMA can include post-approval conditions including, among other things, restrictions on labeling, promotion, sale and distribution, or requirements to do additional clinical studies post-approval. Even after approval of a PMA, a new PMA or PMA supplement is required to authorize certain modifications to the device, its labeling or its manufacturing process. Supplements to a PMA often require the submission of the same type of information required for an original PMA, except that the supplement is generally limited to that information needed to support the proposed change from the product covered by the original PMA. During the review of a PMA, the FDA may request more information or additional studies and may decide that the indications for which we seek approval or clearance should be limited.
If human clinical trials of a medical device are required and the device presents a significant risk, the sponsor of the trial must file an investigational device exemption, or IDE, application prior to commencing human clinical trials. The IDE application must be supported by data, typically including the results of animal and/or laboratory testing. If the IDE application is approved by the FDA and one or more institutional review boards, human clinical trials may begin at a specific number of investigational sites with a specific number of patients, as approved by the FDA. If the device presents a non-significant risk to the patient, a sponsor may begin the clinical trial after obtaining approval for the trial by one or more institutional review boards without separate approval from the FDA. Submission of an IDE does not give assurance that the FDA will approve the IDE and, if it is approved, the FDA may determine that the data derived from the trials support the safety and effectiveness of the device or warrant the continuation of clinical trials. An IDE supplement must be submitted to, and approved by, the FDA before a sponsor or investigator may make a change to the investigational plan that may affect its scientific soundness, study indication or the rights, safety or welfare of human subjects. The trial also must comply with the FDA’s IDE regulations and informed consent must be obtained from each subject.
European Economic Area
A medicinal product may only be placed on the market in the European Economic Area, or EEA, composed of the 27 EU member states, plus Norway, Iceland and Lichtenstein, when a marketing authorization has been issued by the competent authority of a member state pursuant to Directive 2001/83/EC (as recently amended by Directive 2004/27/EC), or an authorization has been granted under the centralized procedure in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 726/2004 or its predecessor, Regulation 2309/93. There are essentially three community procedures created under prevailing European pharmaceutical legislation that, if successfully completed, allow an applicant to place a medicinal product on the market in the EEA.
Centralized Procedure
Regulation 726/2004/EC now governs the centralized procedure when a marketing authorization is granted by the European Commission, acting in its capacity as the European Licensing Authority on the advice of the European Medicines Agency, or EMEA. That authorization is valid throughout the entire community and directly or (as to Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein) indirectly allows the applicant to place the product on the market in all member states of the EEA. The EMEA is the administrative body responsible for coordinating the existing scientific resources available in the member states for evaluation, supervision and pharmacovigilance of medicinal products. Certain medicinal products, as described in the Annex to Regulation 726/2004, must be authorized centrally. These are products that are developed by means of a biotechnological process in accordance with Paragraph 1 to the Annex to the Regulation. Medicinal products for human use containing a new active substance for which the therapeutic indication is the treatment of acquired immune deficiency syndrome, or AIDS, cancer, neurodegenerative disorder or diabetes must also be authorized centrally. Starting on May 20, 2008, the mandatory centralized procedure was extended to autoimmune diseases and other immune dysfunctions and viral diseases. Finally, all medicinal products that are designated as orphan medicinal products pursuant to Regulation 141/2000 must be authorized under the centralized procedure. An applicant may also opt for assessment through the centralized procedure if it can show that the medicinal product constitutes a significant therapeutic, scientific or technical innovation or that the granting of authorization centrally is in the interests of patients at the community level. For each application submitted to the EMEA for scientific assessment, the EMEA is required to ensure that the opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, or CHMP, is given within 210 days after receipt of a valid application. If the opinion is positive, the EMEA is required to send the opinion to the European Commission, which is responsible for preparing the decision granting a marketing authorization. If the initial opinion of the CHMP is negative, the applicant is afforded an opportunity to seek a re-examination of the opinion. The CHMP is required to re-examine its opinion within 60 days following receipt of the request by the applicant. A refusal of a centralized marketing authorization constitutes a prohibition on placing the given medicinal product on the market in the community.
Mutual Recognition and Decentralized Procedures.
With the exception of products that are authorized centrally, the competent authorities of the member states are responsible for granting marketing authorizations for medicinal products placed on their markets. If the applicant for a marketing authorization intends to market the same medicinal product in more than one member state, the applicant may seek an authorization progressively in the community under the mutual recognition or decentralized procedure. Mutual recognition is used if the medicinal product has already been authorized in a member state. In this case, the holder of this marketing authorization requests the member state where the authorization has been granted to act as reference member state by preparing an updated assessment report that is then used to facilitate mutual recognition of the existing authorization in the other member states in which approval is sought (the so-called concerned member state(s)). The reference member state must prepare an updated assessment report within 90 days of receipt of a valid application. This report together with the approved Summary of Product Characteristics, or SmPC (which sets out the conditions of use of the product), and a labeling and package leaflet are sent to the concerned member states for their consideration. The concerned member states are required to approve the assessment report, the SmPC and the labeling and package leaflet within 90 days of receipt of these documents. The total procedural time is 180 days.
The decentralized procedure is used in cases where the medicinal product has not received a marketing authorization in the EU at the time of application. The applicant requests a member state of its choice to act as reference member state to prepare an assessment report that is then used to facilitate agreement with the concerned member states and the grant of a national marketing authorization in all of these member states. In this procedure, the reference member state must prepare, for consideration by the concerned member states, the draft assessment report, a draft SmPC and a draft of the labeling and package leaflet within 120 days after receipt of a valid application. As in the case of mutual recognition, the concerned member states are required to approve these documents within 90 days of their receipt.
For both mutual recognition and decentralized procedures, if a concerned member state objects to the grant of a marketing authorization on the grounds of a potential serious risk to public health, it may raise a reasoned objection with the reference member state. The points of disagreement are in the first instance referred to the Co-ordination Group on Mutual Recognition and Decentralized Procedures, or CMD, to reach an agreement within 60 days of the communication of the points of disagreement. If member states fail to reach an agreement, then the matter is referred to the EMEA and CHMP for arbitration. The CHMP is required to deliver a reasoned opinion within 60 days of the date on which the matter is referred. The scientific opinion adopted by the CHMP forms the basis for a binding European Commission decision.
Irrespective of whether the medicinal product is assessed centrally, de-centrally or through a process of mutual recognition, the medicinal product must be manufactured in accordance with the principles of good manufacturing practice as set out in Directive 2003/94/EC and Volume 4 of the rules governing medicinal products in the European community. Moreover, community law requires the clinical results in support of clinical safety and efficacy to be based upon clinical trials conducted in the European community in compliance with the requirements of Directive 2001/20/EC, which implements good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Clinical trials conducted outside the European community and used to support applications for marketing within the EU must have been conducted in a way consistent with the principles set out in Directive 2001/20/EC. The conduct of a clinical trial in the EU requires, pursuant to Directive 2001/20/EC, authorization by the relevant national competent authority where a trial takes place, and an ethics committee to have issued a favorable opinion in relation to the arrangements for the trial. It also requires that the sponsor of the trial, or a person authorized to act on his behalf in relation to the trial, be established in the community.
There are various types of applications for marketing authorizations:
Full Applications.
A full application is one that is made under any of the community procedures described above and “stands alone” in the sense that it contains all of the particulars and information required by Article 8(3) of Directive 2001/83 (as amended) to allow the competent authority to assess the quality, safety and efficacy of the product and in particular the balance between benefit and risk. Article 8(3)(l) in particular refers to the need to present the results of the applicant’s research on (1) pharmaceutical (physical-chemical, biological or microbiological) tests, (2) preclinical (toxicological and pharmacological) studies and (3) clinical trials in humans. The nature of these tests, studies and trials is explained in more detail in Annex I to Directive 2001/83/EC. Full applications would be required for products containing new active substances not previously approved by the competent authority, but may also be made for other products.
Abridged Applications.
Article 10 of Directive 2001/83/EC contains exemptions from the requirement that the applicant provide the results of its own preclinical and clinical research. There are three regulatory routes for an applicant to seek an exemption from providing such results, namely (1) cross-referral to an innovator’s results without consent of the innovator, (2) well established use according to published literature and (3) consent to refer to an existing dossier of research results filed by a previous applicant.
Cross-referral to Innovator’s Data
Articles 10(1) and 10(2)(b) of Directive 2001/83/EC provide the legal basis for an applicant to seek a marketing authorization on the basis that its product is a generic medicinal product (a copy) of a reference medicinal product that has already been authorized, in accordance with community provisions. A reference product is, in principle, an original product granted an authorization on the basis of a full dossier of particulars and information. This is the main exemption used by generic manufacturers for obtaining a marketing authorization for a copy product. The generic applicant is not required to provide the results of preclinical studies and of clinical trials if its product meets the definition of a generic medicinal product and the applicable regulatory results protection period for the results submitted by the innovator has expired. A generic medicinal product is defined as a medicinal product:
|
|
•
|
having the same qualitative and quantitative composition in active substance as the reference medicinal product;
|
|
|
•
|
having the same pharmaceutical form as the reference medicinal product; and
|
|
|
•
|
whose bioequivalence with the reference medicinal product has been demonstrated by appropriate bioavailability studies.
|
Applications in respect of a generic medicinal product cannot be made before the expiry of the protection period. Where the reference product was granted a national marketing authorization pursuant to an application made before October 30, 2005, the protection period is either six years or 10 years, depending upon the election of the particular member state concerned. Where the reference product was granted a marketing authorization centrally, pursuant to an application made before November 20, 2005, the protection period is 10 years. For applications made after these dates, Regulation 726/2004 and amendments to Directive 2001/83/EC provide for a harmonized protection period regardless of the approval route utilized. The harmonized protection period is in total 10 years, including eight years of research data protection and two years of marketing protection. The effect is that the originator’s results can be the subject of a cross-referral application after eight years, but any resulting authorization cannot be exploited for a further two years. The rationale of this procedure is not that the competent authority does not have before it relevant tests and trials upon which to assess the efficacy and safety of the generic product, but that the relevant particulars can, if the research data protection period has expired, be found on the originator’s file and used for assessment of the generic medicinal product. The 10-year protection period can be extended to 11 years where, in the first eight years post-authorization, the holder of the authorization obtains approval for a new indication assessed as offering a significant clinical benefit in comparison with existing products.
If the copy product does not meet the definition of a generic medicinal product or if certain types of changes occur in the active substance(s) or in the therapeutic indications, strength, pharmaceutical form or route of administration in relation to the reference medicinal product, Article 10(3) of Directive 2001/83/EC provides that the results of the appropriate preclinical studies or clinical trials must be provided by the applicant.
Well-established Medicinal Use
Under Article 10a of Directive 2001/83/EC, an applicant may, in substitution for the results of its own preclinical and clinical research, present detailed references to published literature demonstrating that the active substance(s) of a product have a well-established medicinal use within the community with recognized efficacy and an acceptable level of safety. The applicant is entitled to refer to a variety of different types of literature, including reports of clinical trials with the same active substance(s) and epidemiological studies that indicate that the constituent or constituents of the product have an acceptable safety/efficacy profile for a particular indication. However, use of the published literature exemption is restricted by stating that in no circumstances will constituents be treated as having a well-established use if they have been used for less than 10 years from the first systematic and documented use of the substance as a medicinal product in the community. Even after 10 years’ systematic use, the threshold for well-established medicinal use might not be met. European pharmaceutical law requires the competent authorities to consider the period over which a substance has been used, the amount of patient use of the substance, the degree of scientific interest in the use of the substance (as reflected in the scientific literature) and the coherence (consistency) of all the scientific assessments made in the literature. For this reason, different substances may reach the threshold for well-established use after different periods, but the minimum period is 10 years. If the applicant seeks approval of an entirely new therapeutic use compared with that to which the published literature refers, additional preclinical and/or clinical results would have to be provided.
Informed Consent
Under Article 10c of Directive 2001/83/EC, following the grant of a marketing authorization the holder of such authorization may consent to a competent authority utilizing the pharmaceutical, preclinical and clinical documentation that it submitted to obtain approval for a medicinal product to assess a subsequent application relating to a medicinal product possessing the same qualitative and quantitative composition with respect to the active substances and the same pharmaceutical form.
Law Relating to Pediatric Research
Regulation (EC) 1901/2006 (as amended by Regulation (EC) 1902/2006) was adopted on December 12, 2006. This Regulation governs the development of medicinal products for human use in order to meet the specific therapeutic needs of the pediatric population. It requires any application for marketing authorization made after July 26, 2008 in respect of a product not authorized in the European Community on January 26, 2007 (the time the Regulation entered into force), to include studies in children conducted in accordance with a pediatric investigation plan agreed to by the relevant European authorities, unless the product is subject to an agreed waiver or deferral. Waivers can be granted in certain circumstances where pediatric studies are not required or desirable. Deferrals can be granted in certain circumstances where the initiation or completion of pediatric studies should be deferred until appropriate studies in adults have been performed. Moreover, this regulation imposes the same obligation from January 26, 2009 on an applicant seeking approval of a new indication, pharmaceutical form or route of administration for a product already authorized and still protected by a supplementary protection certificate granted under Regulation (EEC) 1768/92 or by a patent that qualifies for the granting of such a supplementary protection certificate. The pediatric Regulation 1901/2006 also provides, subject to certain conditions, a reward for performing such pediatric studies, regardless of whether the pediatric results provided resulted in the grant of a pediatric indication. This reward comes in the form of an extension of six months to the supplementary protection certificate granted in respect of the product, unless the product is subject to orphan drug designation, in which case the 10-year market exclusivity period for such orphan products is extended to 12 years. Where the product is no longer covered by a patent or supplementary protection certificate, the applicant may make a separate application for a Pediatric Use Marketing Authorization, which, on approval, will provide 10 years’ regulatory results and marketing protection for the pediatric results.
Post-authorization Obligations
An authorization to market a medicinal product in the EU carries with it an obligation to comply with many post-authorization regulations relating to the marketing and other activities of authorization holders. These include requirements relating to adverse event reporting and other pharmacovigilance requirements, advertising, packaging and labeling, patient package leaflets, distribution and wholesale dealing. The regulations frequently operate within a criminal law framework and failure to comply with the requirements may not only affect the authorization, but also can lead to financial and other sanctions levied on the company in question and responsible officers.
Approval of Medical Devices
In the 25 member states of the European Union there is a consolidated system for the authorization of medical devices. The European Union requires that manufacturers of medical devices obtain the right to affix the CE mark to their products, which shows that the device has a Certificat de Conformité, before selling them in European Union member countries. The CE mark is an international symbol of adherence to quality assurance standards and compliance with applicable European medical device directives. In order to obtain the right to affix the CE mark to products, a manufacturer must obtain certification that its processes meet certain European quality standards, which vary according to the nature of the device. Compliance with the Medical Device Directive, as certified by a recognized European Notified Body, permits the manufacturer to affix the CE mark on its products and commercially distribute those products throughout the European Union without further conformance tests being required in other member states.
Israel
Israel Ministry of the Environment — Toxin Permit
In accordance with the Israeli Dangerous Substance Law — 1993, the Ministry of the Environment is required to grant a permit in order to use toxic materials. Because we utilize toxic materials in the course of operation of our laboratories, we were required to apply for a permit to use these materials. Our current toxin permit will remain in effect until January 2015.
Clinical Testing in Israel
In order to conduct clinical testing on humans in Israel, special authorization must first be obtained from the ethics committee and general manager of the institution in which the clinical studies are scheduled to be conducted, as required under the Guidelines for Clinical Trials in Human Subjects implemented pursuant to the Israeli Public Health Regulations (Clinical Trials in Human Subjects), as amended from time to time, and other applicable legislation. These regulations also require authorization from the Israeli Ministry of Health, except in certain circumstances, and in the case of genetic trials, special fertility trials and similar trials, an additional authorization of the overseeing institutional ethics committee. The institutional ethics committee must, among other things, evaluate the anticipated benefits that are likely to be derived from the project to determine if it justifies the risks and inconvenience to be inflicted on the human subjects, and the committee must ensure that adequate protection exists for the rights and safety of the participants as well as the accuracy of the information gathered in the course of the clinical testing. Since we intend to perform a portion of the clinical studies on certain of our therapeutic candidates in Israel, we will be required to obtain authorization from the ethics committee and general manager of each institution in which we intend to conduct our clinical trials, and in most cases, from the Israeli Ministry of Health.
Other Countries
In addition to regulations in the United States, the European Union and Israel, we are subject to a variety of other regulations governing clinical trials and commercial sales and distribution of drugs in other countries. Whether or not our products receive approval from the FDA, approval of such products must be obtained by the comparable regulatory authorities of countries other than the United States before we can commence clinical trials or marketing of the product in those countries. The approval process varies from country to country, and the time may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials and product licensing vary greatly from country to country.
Related Matters
From time to time, legislation is drafted, introduced and passed in governmental bodies that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing the approval, manufacturing and marketing of products regulated by the FDA or EMEA and other applicable regulatory bodies to which we are subject. In addition, regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the national agency in ways that may significantly affect our business and our therapeutic candidates. It is impossible to predict whether such legislative changes will be enacted, whether FDA or EMEA regulations, guidance or interpretations will change, or what the impact of such changes, if any, may be. We may need to adapt our business and therapeutic candidates and products to changes that occur in the future.
Israeli Government Programs
Israel Office of the Chief Scientist
Research and Development Grants
. A number of our therapeutic products have been financed, in part, through grants from the OCS in accordance with the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Industrial Research and Development, 1984 and related regulations, or the Research Law. As of September 30, 2011, we have received approximately NIS 69.5 million ($18.7 million) million in grants and loans from the OCS, including accrued interest, in the aggregate, which amount includes, among other payments, approximately NIS 21.6 million ($5.8 million) of OCS research and development grants for particular projects, and approximately NIS 47.9 million ($12.9 million) million for our biotechnology incubator. Such amounts include approximately NIS 32.9 ($8.9 million) of grants received in connection with terminated programs. We are not required to repay grants for terminated programs. Under the Research Law and the terms of the grants, royalties on the revenues derived from sales of products developed with the support of the OCS are payable to the Israeli government, generally at the rate of 3% during the first three years of repayment, 4% during the subsequent three years and 5% from the seventh year onwards, although these terms are different in the event we out-license the products or receive the OCS approval for the transfer the manufacture or to transfer the rights to manufacture our products developed with OCS grants outside of Israel. The obligation to make these payments terminates upon repayment of the amount of the received grants as adjusted for fluctuation in the U.S. dollar/shekel exchange rate, plus any additional amounts as described below, although we may be required to pay an increased total amount of royalties (possibly up to 300% of the grant amounts plus interest) if we receive approval to manufacture or to transfer the rights to manufacture our products developed with OCS grants outside of Israel, depending on the portion of total manufacturing that is performed outside of Israel, as further described below. The amounts received bear interest equal to the 12-month London Interbank Offered Rate applicable to dollar deposits that is published on the first business day of each calendar year.
Pursuant to the Research Law, recipients of grants from the OCS are prohibited from manufacturing products developed using OCS grants or derived from technology developed with OCS grants outside of the State of Israel and from transferring rights to manufacture such products outside of Israel. However, the OCS may, in special cases, approve the transfer of manufacture or of manufacturing rights of a product developed in an approved program or which results therefrom, outside of Israel. If we were to receive approval to manufacture or to transfer the rights to manufacture our products developed with OCS grants outside of Israel, we would be required to pay an increased total amount of royalties (possibly up to 300% of the grant amounts plus interest), depending on the portion of total manufacturing that is performed outside of Israel. In addition, the royalty rate applicable to us could possibly increase. Such increased royalties constitute the total repayment amount required in connection with the transfer of manufacturing rights of OCS funded products outside Israel. The Research Law does enable companies to seek prior approval for conducting manufacturing activities outside of Israel without being subject to increased royalties; however, the OCS rarely grants such prior approval.
In addition, under the Research Law, we are prohibited from transferring our OCS financed technologies, technologies derived therefrom and related intellectual property rights outside of Israel except under limited circumstances and only with the approval of the OCS and upon making a payment to the OCS. We may not receive the required approvals for any proposed transfer and, if received, we may be required to pay the OCS a portion of the consideration that we receive upon any sale of such technology to a non-Israeli entity. The scope of the support received, the royalties that we may have already paid to the OCS, the amount of time that has elapsed between the date on which the technology was transferred and the date on which the OCS grants were received and the sale price and the form of transaction will be taken into account in order to calculate the amount of the payment to the OCS. In addition, approval of the transfer of technology to residents of Israel is required, and may be granted in specific circumstances, only if the recipient agrees to abide by the provisions of applicable laws, including the restrictions on the transfer of know-how and the obligation to pay royalties. No assurances can be made that approval to any such transfer, if requested, will be granted.
The State of Israel does not own intellectual property rights in technology developed with OCS funding and there is no restriction on the export of products manufactured using technology developed with OCS funding. The technology is, however, subject to transfer of technology and manufacturing rights restrictions as described above. For a description of such restrictions, please see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Operations in Israel.” OCS approval is not required for the export of any products resulting from the research or development or for the licensing of any technology in the ordinary course of business.
Biotechnology Incubator Program
. In 2001, the OCS launched a biotechnology incubator program for advancing Israel’s biotechnology industry. The program was significantly changed by the OCS in May 2004, pursuant to which the OCS invited companies to submit proposals to establish and operate OCS-funded biotechnology incubators to provide a physical, organized and professional platform for commercializing biotechnological research and development projects. We submitted a proposal to operate a biotechnology incubator, and our proposal was accepted by the OCS. Accordingly, we entered into the incubator agreement with the OCS in January 2005. The initial agreement was scheduled to expire on December 31, 2010 but at the end of 2010, the OCS agreed to renew the agreement for an additional two years, with an option to renew for another one-year period at the same terms and conditions, subject to OCS approval. We formed BIJ L.P. to act as the incubator entity. Our wholly-owned subsidiary, BIJ Ltd., is the general partner of BIJ L.P., also referred to as the incubator, and owns 1% of BIJ L.P.’s partnership interests, while BioLineRx is a limited partner of BIJ L.P. and owns the remaining 99% of BIJ L.P.’s partnership interests.
As of September 30, 2011, we have received approximately $12.9 million from the OCS under the incubator agreement to fund 22 different development projects, 16 of which have terminated. Of our 18 current development projects, six have been funded under the incubator agreement, BL-1021, BL-1040, BL-5040, BL-6010, BL-6030 and BL-7020. Requests are currently on file to fund an additional one project under the incubator agreement, but such requests have not yet been approved by the OCS as of September 30, 2011. Other projects may also be funded by the OCS outside of the incubator agreement.
Israel Ministry of Health
Israel’s Ministry of Health, which regulates medical testing, has adopted protocols that correspond, generally, to those of the FDA and the European Medicines Agency, making it comparatively straightforward for studies conducted in Israel to satisfy FDA and the European Medicines Agency requirements, thereby enabling medical technologies subjected to clinical trials in Israel to reach U.S. and E.U. commercial markets in an expedited fashion. Many members of Israel’s medical community have earned international prestige in their chosen fields of expertise and routinely collaborate, teach and lecture at leading medical centers throughout the world. Israel also has free trade agreements with the United States and the European Union.
Organizational Structure
Our corporate structure consists of BioLineRx and three wholly-owned subsidiary entities: BioLine Innovations Jerusalem Limited Partnership, or BIJ L.P.; BioLine Innovations Jerusalem Ltd., or BIJ Ltd.; and BioLineRx USA Inc. BIJ Ltd. and BIJ L.P. are engaged in the operation of our biotechnology incubator. BioLineRx USA Inc. is currently inactive. At the beginning of 2011, our Board of Directors decided to transfer all business development functions back to Israel in order to reorganize the business development efforts and administer such efforts from our headquarters. The Board of Directors believes that maintaining the business development functions in the United States did not add value to our company. We believe that the effects of this action are immaterial to our financial statements.
Property, Plants, and Equipment
We are headquartered in Jerusalem, Israel. We lease one facility pursuant to a lease agreement with Caps-Pharma Ltd. that expires on December 15, 2012, with options to renew through December 2016. The Jerusalem headquarters consists of approximately 1,700 square meters of space and lease payments are approximately $21,600 per month. This facility houses both our administrative and research operations and our central laboratory. The central laboratory consists of approximately 600 square meters and includes an analytical chemistry laboratory, a formulation laboratory, and a tissue culture laboratory. Our central laboratory is compliant with both cGMP and GLP and allow us to manufacture therapeutic supplies for our current clinical trials. We are currently outfitting a section of the central laboratory as a Class 1000 Clean Room for the synthesis of compounds that require a clean environment for development. Substantially all of our employees are based in this facility.
A. Directors and Senior Management
The following table sets forth information for our executive officers and directors as of December 31, 2011. Unless otherwise stated, the address for our directors and officers is c/o BioLineRx Ltd., P.O. Box 45158, 19 Hartum Street, Jerusalem 91450, Israel.
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position(s)
|
||
|
Kinneret Savitsky, Ph.D.
|
44
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
||
|
Philip Serlin
|
51
|
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
|
||
|
Moshe Phillip, M.D.
|
57
|
Vice President of Medical Affairs and Senior Clinical Advisor
|
||
|
Leah Klapper, Ph.D.
|
47
|
General Manager, BioLine Innovations Jerusalem
|
||
|
David Malek
|
34
|
Vice President of Business Development
|
||
|
Aharon Schwartz, Ph.D.
|
69
|
Chairman of the Board
|
||
|
Raphael Hofstein, Ph.D.
|
62
|
Director
|
||
|
Yakov Friedman
|
43
|
Director
|
||
|
Michael J. Anghel, Ph.D.
|
72
|
Director
|
||
|
Avraham Molcho, M.D.
|
54
|
External Director
|
||
|
Nurit Benjamini
|
45
|
External Director
|
Kinneret Savitsky, Ph.D.
, has served as our Chief Executive Officer since January 2010. Prior to becoming our Chief Executive Officer, from 2004 through 2010, she served as the General Manager of BIJ, our wholly-owned subsidiary. Prior to joining BIJ, Dr. Savitsky served as the Vice President of Biology of Compugen Ltd. (Nasdaq: CGEN), from 2000 to 2004, and held other senior positions at Compugen from 1997 through 2000. During 2010 and 2011, Dr. Savitsky served as a director on our Board of Directors; she currently serves as an external director at Evogene Ltd. (TASE:EVGN). Dr. Savitsky received her Ph.D. in Human Genetics from Tel Aviv University, a Master’s degree in Human Genetics from Tel Aviv University and a B.Sc. in Biology from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Philip Serlin
has been our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer since May 2009. From January 2008 to August 2008, Mr. Serlin served as the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Kayote Networks Inc. From January 2006 to December 2007, he served as the Chief Financial Officer of Tescom Software Systems Testing Ltd. (TASE:TSCM), an IT services company publicly traded in both Tel Aviv and London. His background also includes senior positions at Chiaro Networks Ltd. and at Deloitte, where he was head of the SEC and U.S. Accounting Department at the National Office in Tel Aviv, as well as seven years at the SEC at its Washington, D.C., headquarters. Mr. Serlin serves on the Board of Directors and audit committee of Vringo, Inc. (AMEX: VRNG). Mr. Serlin is a CPA and holds a B.Sc. in Accounting from Yeshiva University and a Master’s degree in Economics and Public Policy from The George Washington University.
Moshe Phillip, M.D.
, has been our Vice President of Medical Affairs and Senior Clinical Advisor and a member of our Scientific Advisory Board since 2004. Professor Phillip is the Director of the Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes of the Israel National Center for Childhood Diabetes at the Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, has served as the Vice Dean and Head of School for Continuing Medical Education and currently is the Vice Dean for Research and Development at the Sackler School of Medical Education at Tel Aviv University. Professor Phillip served as the Chairman of the Israel Diabetes Association’s Committee for Type 1 Diabetes, serves as the Chair of Type 1 Diabetes in the Diabetes National Councils of Health and as a member of the Pediatric National Council of Health. Professor Phillip is also on the editorial board of three medical journals, including Pediatric Diabetes and Hormone Research. Since 2008, Professor Phillip has served as a director of CGU3, a privately-held company. Professor Phillip holds an M.D. from the Ben Gurion University of the Negev and received a fellowship in pediatric endocrinology at the University of Maryland School of Medicine.
Leah Klapper, Ph.D.
, has served as the General Manager of BIJ since January 2010. Prior to that, from 2004 through 2010, she served as Vice President of Preclinical development of BIJ. From 2001 through 2005, Dr. Klapper served as Vice President of Research and Development at CureTech Ltd., a biotechnology company developing novel immune-modulating molecules, where she founded the research laboratory and led the company from the bench to clinical studies. Dr. Klapper gained extensive post-doctoral training at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle Washington. Dr. Klapper received her Ph.D. from the Weizmann Institute, her M.Sc. from the Department of Pharmacology at Tel Aviv University and a B.Sc. in Life Sciences from Tel Aviv University.
David Malek
has served as our Vice President of Business Development since October 2011. Prior to joining BioLineRx, from 2007 to 2011 Mr. Malek served at Sanofi-Aventis in a number of management positions, including Marketing, Finance and Business Development. Most recently, he served as Director of Oncology - New Products and Business Development. Mr. Malek received an MBA from the Tuck Business School at Dartmouth University and a BA in Statistics and Political Science from the University of Haifa.
Aharon Schwartz, Ph.D.
, has served as the Chairman of our Board of Directors since 2003. He served in a number of positions in Teva from 1975 through 2011, the most recent being Vice President, Head of Teva Innovative Ventures from 2008. Dr. Schwartz also served as Chairman of DenX Ltd. and Immudar. He is currently a non-executive member of the boards of numerous life science companies, including Clal Biotechnology Industries Ltd. (TASE:CBI), Proteologic Ltd. and Mediwound Ltd. Dr. Schwartz received his Ph.D. in organic chemistry from the Weizmann Institute, his M.Sc. in organic chemistry from the Technion Institute of Technology and a B.Sc. in chemistry and physics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Raphael Hofstein, Ph.D.,
has served on our Board of Directors since 2003, and has served on our Audit Committee since 2007. Dr. Hofstein has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of MaRS Innovation (a commercialization company of the University of Toronto and 10 affiliated hospitals) since June 2009. From 2000 through June 2009, Dr. Hofstein was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Hadasit Ltd., or Hadasit, the technology transfer company of Hadassah Hospital. He has served as chairman of the board of directors of Hadasit since 2006. Prior to joining Hadasit, Dr. Hofstein was the President of Mindsense Biosystems Ltd. and the Business Unit Director of Ecogen Inc. and has held a variety of other positions, including manager of R&D and chief of immunochemistry at the International Genetic Science Partnership. Dr. Hofstein serves on the board of directors of numerous companies, including Hadasit Bio-Holdings Ltd. (TASE:HDST). Dr. Hofstein received his Ph.D. and M.Sc. from the Weizmann Institute of Science, and his B.Sc. in chemistry and physics from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. Dr. Hofstein completed postdoctoral training at Harvard Medical School in both the departments of biological chemistry and neurobiology.
Yakov Friedman
has served on our Board of Directors since 2007. Mr. Friedman has worked as a financial analyst and trader for Friedberg Mercantile Group since 2001. Mr. Friedman serves on the board of directors and as treasurer or secretary of a number of charities and not-for-profit organizations. Mr. Friedman holds an LLB from Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, a BAS in Administrative Studies and an MBA in Finance from York University.
Michael J. Anghel, Ph.D.
, has served on our Board of Directors since September 2010. From 1977 to 1999, he led the Discount Investment Corporation Ltd. (of the IDB Group) activities in the fields of technology and communications. Dr. Anghel was instrumental in founding Tevel, one of the first Israeli cable television operators and later in founding Cellcom Israel Ltd. (NYSE:CEL), the second Israeli cellular operator. In 1999, he founded CAP Ventures, an advanced technology investment company. From 2004 to 2005, Dr. Anghel served as CEO of DCM, the investment banking arm of the Israel Discount Bank (TASE:DSCT). He has been involved in various technology enterprises and has served on the Boards of Directors of various major Israeli corporations and financial institutions including Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. (TASE:ELRN), Elbit Systems Ltd. (Nasdaq:ESLT, TASE:ESLT), Nice Systems (Nasdaq:NICE), Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (Nasdaq:GILT), American Israeli Paper Mills (now Hadera Paper Ltd. (AMEX:AIP)), Maalot (the Israeli affiliate of Standard and Poor’s) and Hapoalim Capital Markets. He currently serves on the Boards of Directors of Partner Communications Company, Ltd. (Nasdaq:PTNR, TASE:PTNR), Syneron Medical Ltd. (Nasdaq:ELOS), Evogene Ltd. (TASE:EVGN), Gravity Visual Effects and Design Ltd., Dan Hotels Ltd. (TASE:DANH), Orbotech Ltd. (Nasdaq:ORBK, GSM:ORBK) and the Strauss-Group Ltd. (TASE:STRS). He is also the chairman of the Center for Educational Technology. Prior to launching his business career, Dr. Anghel served as a full-time member of the Recanati Graduate School of Business Administration of the Tel Aviv University, where he taught finance and corporate strategy. He currently serves as Chairman of the Tel Aviv University’s Executive Program. Dr. Anghel holds a B.A. (Economics) from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and an MBA. and Ph.D. (Finance) from Columbia University, New York.
Avraham Molcho, M.D., MBA
, has served as an external director on our Board of Directors and the Audit Committee of our Board since July 2010. Dr. Molcho is the Founder and Chairman of Biologic Design, a technology platform that encourages human antibody discoveries, and is a venture partner at Forbion Capital Partners, a Dutch life sciences venture capital firm. He currently serves on the board of directors of D-Pharm Ltd. (TASE:DPRM), Circulite Inc. and NovoGI. From 2001 through 2006, Dr. Molcho was a managing director and the head of life sciences of Giza Venture Capital and, in that capacity, was involved in the founding of our company. From 2006 through 2008, Dr. Molcho served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Neovasc Medical, a privately-held Israeli medical device company. He was also the Deputy Director General of Abarbanel Mental Health Center, the largest acute psychiatric hospital in Israel, from 1999 to 2001. Dr. Molcho holds an M.D. from Tel-Aviv University School of Medicine and an MBA from Tel-Aviv University Recanati Business School.
Nurit Benjamini, MBA
, has served as an external director on our Board of Directors and as the chairman of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors since July 2010. Since May 2011, Ms. Benjamini has served as the Chief Financial Officer of Wixpress Ltd. Prior to that, from 2007 through 2011, she served as the Chief Financial Officer of CopperGate Communications Ltd. From 2000 through 2007, Ms. Benjamini served as the Chief Financial Officer of Compugen Ltd. (Nasdaq: CGEN). Prior to that, from 1998 through 2000, Ms. Benjamini served as the Chief Financial Officer of Phone-Or Ltd. and from 1993 through 1998, Ms. Benjamini served as the Chief Financial Officer of Aladdin Knowledge Systems Ltd. Ms. Benjamini serves on the board of directors, and as chairperson of the audit committee, of Allot Communications Ltd. (Nasdaq:ALLT, TASE:ALLT). Ms. Benjamini holds a B.A. in Economics and Business and an M.B.A. in Finance, both from Bar Ilan University, Israel.
B. Compensation
Employment Agreements
We have entered into written employment agreements with each of our executive officers. All of these agreements contain customary provisions regarding noncompetition, confidentiality of information and assignment of inventions. However, the enforceability of the noncompetition provisions may be limited under applicable law.
In addition, we have entered into agreements with each executive officer and director pursuant to which we have agreed to indemnify each of them to the fullest extent permitted by law to the extent that these liabilities are not covered by directors and officers insurance.
Compensation of Directors and Senior Management
The following table presents all compensation we paid to all of our directors and senior management as a group for the year ended December 31, 2011. The table does not include any amounts we paid to reimburse any of such persons for costs incurred in providing us with services during this period.
|
Salaries, fees, commissions and
bonuses (NIS)
|
Pension, retirement, options and other
similar benefits (NIS)
|
|||||||
|
All directors and senior management as a group, consisting of 9
(1)
persons
|
3,878,000 | 2,176,000 | ||||||
(1) This group includes one former member of senior management whose employment with BioLineRx ceased during 2011.
Board of Directors
According to the Israeli Companies Law, the management of our business is vested in our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors may exercise all powers and may take all actions that are not specifically granted to our shareholders. Our executive officers are responsible for our day-to-day management and have individual responsibilities established by our Board of Directors. Executive officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of our Board of Directors, subject to any applicable employment agreements we have entered into with the executive officers.
Under the Israeli Companies Law, we are not required to have a majority of independent directors. We are required to appoint at least two external directors. See “— External Directors.” Pursuant to a recent amendment to the Israeli Companies Law which will become effective on September 15, 2011, the audit committee of a publicly-traded company must consist of a majority of unaffiliated directors. See “— Audit Committee.”
According to our Articles of Association, our Board of Directors must consist of at least five and not more than 10 directors, including external directors. Currently, our Board of Directors consists of seven directors, including two external directors as required by the Israeli Companies Law. Pursuant to our Articles of Association, other than the external directors, for whom special election requirements apply under the Israeli Companies Law as detailed below, our directors are elected at a general or special meeting of our shareholders and serve on the Board of Directors until they are removed by the majority of our shareholders at a general or special meeting of our shareholders or upon the occurrence of certain events, in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law and our Articles of Association. In addition, our Articles of Association allow our Board of Directors to appoint directors to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors to serve until the next general meeting or special meeting, or earlier if required by our Articles of Association or applicable law. We have held elections for each of our non-external directors at each annual meeting of our shareholders since our initial public offering in Israel. External directors are elected for an initial term of three years and may be elected, under certain conditions, to two additional terms. External directors may be removed from office only pursuant to the terms of the Israeli Companies Law. Our last annual meeting of shareholders was held in August 2010. See “— External Directors.”
The Israeli Companies Law provides that an Israeli company may, under certain circumstances, exculpate an office holder from liability with respect to a breach of his duty of care toward the company if appropriate provisions allowing such exculpation are included in its articles of association. See “— Exculpation, Insurance and Indemnification of Office Holders.” Our Articles of Association contain such provisions, and we have entered into agreements with each of our office holders undertaking to indemnify them to the fullest extent permitted by law, including with respect to liabilities resulting from this offering to the extent that these liabilities are not covered by insurance.
In accordance with the exemption available to foreign private issuers under applicable Nasdaq rules, we do not follow the requirements of the Nasdaq rules with regard to the process of nominating directors, and instead, will follow Israeli law and practice, in accordance with which our Board of Directors is authorized to recommend to our shareholders director nominees for election, and our shareholders may nominate candidates for election as directors by the shareholders’ general meeting.
In addition, under the Israeli Companies Law, our Board of Directors must determine the minimum number of directors who are required to have financial and accounting expertise. Under applicable regulations, a director with financial and accounting expertise is a director who, by reason of his or her education, professional experience and skill, has a high level of proficiency in and understanding of business accounting matters and financial statements. He or she must be able to thoroughly comprehend the financial statements of the listed company and initiate debate regarding the manner in which financial information is presented. In determining the number of directors required to have such expertise, a company’s board of directors must consider, among other things, the type and size of the company and the scope and complexity of its operations. Our Board of Directors has determined that we require at least one director with the requisite financial and accounting expertise. Ms. Nurit Benjamini and Dr. Michael J. Anghel have such financial and accounting expertise.
The term office holder is defined in the Israeli Companies Law as a director, general manager, chief business manager, deputy general manager, vice general manager, executive vice president, vice president, any other manager directly subordinate to the general manager or any other person assuming the responsibilities of any of the foregoing positions, without regard to such person’s title. Each person listed above under “Executive Officers and Directors” is an office holder.
Chairman of the Board.
Under the Israeli Companies Law, a person cannot hold the role of both chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer of a company, without shareholder approval. Furthermore, pursuant to a recent amendment to the Israeli Companies Law which became effective on May 15, 2011, a person who is directly or indirectly subordinate to a chief executive officer of a company may not serve as the chairman of the board of directors of that company and the chairman of the board of directors may not otherwise serve in any other capacity in a company or in a subsidiary of that company other than as the chairman of the board of directors of such a subsidiary.
External Directors
Under Israeli law, the boards of directors of companies whose shares are publicly traded are required to include at least two members who qualify as external directors. Each of our current external directors, Dr. Avraham Molcho and Ms. Nurit Benjamini, was elected as an external director by our shareholders in July 2010. Their initial terms expire in July 2013.
External directors must be elected by majority vote of the shares present and voting at a shareholders meeting, provided that either:
|
|
•
|
the majority of the shares that are voted at the meeting, including at least a majority of the shares held by non-controlling shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the election of the external director (other than a personal interest not deriving from a relationship with a controlling shareholder) who voted at the meeting, excluding abstentions, vote in favor of the election of the external director; or
|
|
|
•
|
the total number of shares held by non-controlling, disinterested shareholders (as described in the preceding bullet point) that are voted against the election of the external director does not exceed 2% of the aggregate voting rights in the company.
|
After an initial term of three years, external directors may be reelected to serve in that capacity for up to two additional terms of three years provided that either (a) the board of directors has recommended such reelection and such reelection is approved by a majority vote at a shareholders’ meeting, subject to the conditions described above for election of external directors, or (b) the reelection has been recommended by one or more shareholders holding at least 1% of the company’s voting rights and is approved by a majority of non-controlling, disinterested shareholders who hold among them at least 2% of the company’s voting rights. The term of office for external directors for Israeli companies traded on certain foreign stock exchanges, including the Nasdaq Capital Market, may be extended beyond the initial three terms permitted under the Israeli Companies Law indefinitely in increments of additional three-year terms, provided in each case that the following conditions are met: (a) the audit committee and the board of directors confirm that, in light of the external director’s expertise and special contribution to the work of the board of directors and its committees, the reelection for such additional period(s) is beneficial to the company; (b) the reelection is approved by the shareholders by a special majority required for the election of external directors; and (c) the proposed terms of compensation of the external directors, and the considerations of the audit committee and the Board of Directors in deciding to recommend reelection of the external directors, are presented to the shareholders prior to the vote on reelection. External directors may be removed from office by the same percentage of shareholders required for their election or by a court, in each case, only under limited circumstances, including ceasing to meet the statutory qualification for appointment or violating the duty of loyalty to the company. If an external directorship becomes vacant and there are less than two external directors on the board of directors at the time, then the board of directors is required under the Israeli Companies Law to call a shareholders’ meeting immediately to appoint a replacement external director. Each committee of the board of directors that exercises the powers of the board of directors must include at least one external director, except that the audit committee must include all external directors then serving on the board of directors. Under the Israeli Companies Law external directors of a company are prohibited from receiving, directly or indirectly, any compensation from the company other than for their services as external directors pursuant to the provisions and limitations set forth in regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law.
A person may not serve as an external director if (a) the person is a relative of a controlling shareholder of a company or (b) at the date of the person’s appointment or within the prior two years, the person, the person’s relatives, entities under the person’s control, the person’s partner, the person’s employer, or anyone to whom that person is subordinate, whether directly or indirectly, have or have had any affiliation with (1) a company, (2) a company’s controlling shareholder at the time of such person’s appointment or (3) any entity that is either controlled by the company or under common control with the company at the time of such appointment or during the prior two years. If a company does not have a controlling shareholder or a shareholder who holds company shares entitling him to vote at least 25% of the votes in a shareholders meeting, then a person may not serve as an external director if, such person or such person’s relative, partner, employer or any entity under the person’s control, has or had, on or within the two years preceding the date of the person’s appointment to serve as external director, any affiliation with the chairman of the company’s board, chief executive officer, a substantial shareholder who holds at least 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of the company or voting rights which entitle him to vote at least 5% of the votes in a shareholders meeting, or the chief financial officer of the company.
The term affiliation includes:
|
|
•
|
an employment relationship;
|
|
|
•
|
a business or professional relationship even if not maintained on a regular basis (excluding insignificant relationships);
|
|
|
•
|
control; and
|
|
|
•
|
service as an office holder, excluding service as a director in a private company prior to the first offering of its shares to the public if such director was appointed as a director of the private company in order to serve as an external director following the public offering.
|
The term relative is defined as a spouse, sibling, parent, grandparent or descendant; a spouse’s sibling, parent or descendant; and the spouse of each of such persons.
In addition, no person may serve as an external director if that person’s professional activities create, or may create, a conflict of interest with that person’s responsibilities as a director or otherwise interfere with that person’s ability to serve as an external director or if the person is an employee of the Israel Securities Authority or of an Israeli stock exchange. Furthermore, a person may not continue to serve as an external director if he or she received direct or indirect compensation from us for his or her role as a director. This prohibition does not apply to compensation paid or given in accordance with regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law or amounts paid pursuant to indemnification and/or exculpation contracts or commitments and insurance coverage. If at the time an external director is appointed all current members of the board of directors not otherwise affiliated with the company are of the same gender, then that external director must be of the other gender. In addition, a director of a company may not be elected as an external director of another company if, at that time, a director of the other company is acting as an external director of the first company.
Following the termination of an external director’s service on a board of directors, such former external director and his or her spouse and children may not be provided a direct or indirect benefit by the company, its controlling shareholder or any entity under its controlling shareholder’s control. This includes engagement to serve as an executive officer or director of the company or a company controlled by its controlling shareholder or employment by, or providing services to, any such company for consideration, either directly or indirectly, including through a corporation controlled by the former external director, for a period of two years (and for a period of one year with respect to relatives of the former external director).
If at the time an external director is appointed all members of the board of directors are of the same gender, the external director must be of the other gender. A director of one company may not be appointed as an external director of another company if a director of the other company is acting as an external director of the first company at such time.
The Israeli Companies Law provides that an external director must meet certain professional qualifications or have financial and accounting expertise and that at least one external director must have financial and accounting expertise. However, if at least one of our other directors (1) meets the independence requirements of the Exchange Act, (2) meets the standards of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules for membership on the audit committee and (3) has financial and accounting expertise as defined in the Israeli Companies Law and applicable regulations, then neither of our external directors is required to possess financial and accounting expertise as long as both possess other requisite professional qualifications. Our Board of Directors is required to determine whether a director possesses financial and accounting expertise by examining whether, due to the director’s education, experience and qualifications, the director is highly proficient and knowledgeable with regard to business-accounting issues and financial statements, to the extent that the director is able to engage in a discussion concerning the presentation of financial information in the company’s financial statements, among others. The regulations define a director with the requisite professional qualifications as a director who satisfies one of the following requirements: (1) the director holds an academic degree in either economics, business administration, accounting, law or public administration; (2) the director either holds an academic degree in any other field or has completed another form of higher education in the company’s primary field of business or in an area which is relevant to the office of an external director; or (3) the director has at least five years of experience serving in any one of the following, or at least five years of cumulative experience serving in two or more of the following capacities: (1) a senior business management position in a corporation with a substantial scope of business; (2) a senior position in the company’s primary field of business; or (3) a senior position in public administration. Our Board of Directors has determined that Nurit Benjamini possesses “accounting and financial” expertise, and that both of our external directors possess the requisite professional qualifications.
Audit Committee
Under the Israeli Companies Law, the board of directors of a public company must appoint an audit committee. The audit committee must be comprised of at least three directors, including all of the external directors, and one of the external directors must serve as chairperson of the committee. The audit committee of a company may not include:
|
|
•
|
the chairman of the company’s board of directors;
|
|
|
•
|
a controlling shareholder or a relative of a controlling shareholder of the company (as each such term is defined in the Israeli Companies Law); or
|
|
|
•
|
any director employed by the company, by a controlling shareholder of the company or by any other entity controlled by a controlling shareholder of the company, or any director who provides services to the company, to a controlling shareholder of the company or to any other entity controlled by a controlling shareholder of the company on a regular basis (other than as a member of the board of directors), or any other director whose main source of income derives from a controlling shareholder of the company.
|
The term controlling shareholder is defined in the Israeli Companies Law as a shareholder with the ability to direct the activities of the company, other than by virtue of being an office holder. A shareholder is presumed to be a controlling shareholder if the shareholder holds 50% or more of the voting rights in a company or has the right to appoint the majority of the directors of the company or its general manager.
A majority of the total number of then-serving members of an audit committee shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the audit committee meetings, provided, that the majority of the members present at such meeting are unaffiliated directors and at least one of such members is an external director.
The audit committee of a publicly-traded company must consist of a majority of unaffiliated directors. An “unaffiliated director” is defined as either an external director or as a director who meets the following criteria:
|
|
•
|
he or she meets the qualifications for being appointed as an external director, except for (i) the requirement that the director be an Israeli resident (which does not apply to companies such as ours whose securities have been offered outside of Israel or are listed outside of Israel) and (ii) the requirement for accounting and financial expertise or professional qualifications; and
|
|
|
•
|
he or she has not served as a director of the company for a period exceeding nine consecutive years. For this purpose, a break of less than two years in the service shall not be deemed to interrupt the continuation of the service.
|
Any person who is not eligible to serve on the audit committee is further restricted from participating in its meetings and votes, unless the chairman of the audit committee determines that such person’s presence is necessary in order to present a certain matter, provided however, that company employees who are not controlling shareholders or relatives of such shareholders may be present in the meetings but not for the actual votes, and likewise, company counsel and secretary who are not controlling shareholders or relatives of such shareholders may be present in the meetings and for the decisions if such presence is requested by the audit committee.
The members of our Audit Committee are Nurit Benjamini (Chairman), Dr. Avraham Molcho and Dr. Raphael Hofstein. Pursuant to the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, our Board of Directors may appoint one director to our Audit Committee who (1) is not an Independent Director as defined in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2), (2) meets the criteria set forth in Section 10A(m)(3) under the Exchange Act, and (3) is not one of our current officers or employees or “family member,” as defined in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2), of an officer or employee, if our Board of Directors, under exceptional and limited circumstances, determines that the appointment is in our best interests and the best interest of our shareholders, and our Board of Directors discloses, in our next annual report subsequent to the determination, the nature of the relationship and the reasons for that determination.
Our Board of Directors has determined that Nurit Benjamini (Chairman) qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined by rules of the SEC.
Our Board of Directors intends to adopt an audit committee charter that will add to the responsibilities of the audit committee under the Israeli Companies Law, setting forth the responsibilities of the audit committee consistent with the rules of the SEC and the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, including the following:
|
|
•
|
oversight of the company’s independent registered public accounting firm and recommending the engagement, compensation or termination of engagement of the company’s independent registered public accounting firm to the board of directors in accordance with Israeli law;
|
|
|
•
|
recommending the engagement or termination of the office of the company’s internal auditor; and
|
|
|
•
|
recommending the terms of audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm for pre-approval by the board of directors.
|
Our audit committee provides assistance to our Board of Directors in fulfilling its legal and fiduciary obligations in matters involving our accounting, auditing, financial reporting, internal control and legal compliance functions by pre-approving the services performed by our independent accountants and reviewing their reports regarding our accounting practices and systems of internal control over financial reporting. The audit committee also oversees the audit efforts of our independent accountants and takes those actions as it deems necessary to satisfy itself that the accountants are independent of management. Pursuant to a recent amendment to the Israeli Companies Law which determines the role and responsibility of the audit committee and which will become effective on September 15, 2011, the audit committee of a company shall be responsible for: (i) determining whether there are delinquencies in the business management practices of a company, including in consultation with an internal auditor or independent auditor, and making recommendations to the company’s board of directors to improve such practices; (ii) determining whether to approve certain related party transactions (including compensation of office holders or transactions in which an office holder has a personal interest and whether such transaction is material or otherwise an extraordinary transaction); (iii) where the company’s board of directors approves the working plan of the internal auditor, examining such working plan before its submission to the board and proposing amendments thereto; (iv) examining internal controls and the internal auditor’s performance, including whether the internal auditor has sufficient resources and tools to dispose of his responsibilities (taking into consideration the special needs and size if a company); (v) examining the scope of the auditor’s work and compensation and submitting its recommendation with respect thereto to the corporate body considering the appointment thereof (either the board or the general meeting of shareholders); and (vi) establishing procedures for the handling of employees’ complaints as to the management of the business and the protection to be provided to such employees. Under the Israeli Companies Law, the approval of the audit committee is required for specified actions and transactions with office holders and controlling shareholders. See “— Approval of Related Party Transactions under Israeli Law.”
Compensation Committee
Our Board of Directors does not currently have a compensation committee.
Nominating Committee
Our Board of Directors does not currently have a nominating committee, having availed our company of the exemption available to foreign private issuers under the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. See “— Nasdaq Listing Rules and Home Country Practices.”
Financial Statement Examination Committee
Under the Israeli Companies Law, the board of directors of a public company must appoint a financial statement examination committee, which consists of members with accounting and financial expertise or the ability to read and understand financial statements. According to a resolution of our Board of Directors, the Audit Committee has been assigned the responsibilities and duties of a financial statements examination committee, as permitted under relevant regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law. From time to time as necessary and required to approve our financial statements, the Audit Committee holds separate meetings, prior to the scheduled meetings of the entire Board of Directors regarding financial statement approval. The function of a financial statements examination committee is to discuss and provide recommendations to its board of directors (including the report of any deficiency found) with respect to the following issues: (1) estimations and assessments made in connection with the preparation of financial statements; (2) internal controls related to the financial statements; (3) completeness and propriety of the disclosure in the financial statements; (4) the accounting policies adopted and the accounting treatments implemented in material matters of the company; (5) value evaluations, including the assumptions and assessments on which evaluations are based and the supporting data in the financial statements. Our independent auditors and our internal auditors are invited to attend all meetings of Audit Committee when it is acting in the role of the financial statements examination committee.
Investment Monitoring Committee
Our Board of Directors has established an Investment Monitoring Committee consisting of four members: Directors Nurit Benjamini and Michael Anghel; Philip Serlin, our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer; and Razi Fried, our Treasurer. The function of the Investment Monitoring Committee includes providing recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding investment guidelines and performing an on-going review of the fulfillment of established investment guidelines. The Investment Monitoring Committee convenes for a meeting in accordance with our needs, and in any event at least twice per year. The Investment Monitoring Committee reports to the Board of Directors on a semi-annual basis.
Internal Auditor
Under the Israeli Companies Law, the board of directors of an Israeli public company must appoint an internal auditor recommended by the audit committee and nominated by the board of directors. An internal auditor may not be:
|
|
•
|
a person (or a relative of a person) who holds more than 5% of the company’s shares;
|
|
|
•
|
a person (or a relative of a person) who has the power to appoint a director or the general manager of the company;
|
|
|
•
|
an executive officer or director of the company; or
|
|
|
•
|
a member of the company’s independent accounting firm.
|
The role of the internal auditor is to examine, among other things, our compliance with applicable law and orderly business procedures. Our internal auditor is Linur Dloomy, CPA (Israel) a partner of Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co. (a member firm of Deloitte).
Approval of Related Party Transactions under Israeli Law
Fiduciary duties of office holders
The Companies Law imposes a duty of care and a duty of loyalty on all office holders of a company. The duty of care of an office holder is based on the duty of care set forth in connection with the tort of negligence under the Israeli Torts Ordinance (New Version) 5728-1968. This duty of care requires an office holder to act with the degree of proficiency with which a reasonable office holder in the same position would have acted under the same circumstances. The duty of care includes a duty to use reasonable means, in light of the circumstances, to obtain:
|
|
•
|
information on the advisability of a given action brought for his or her approval or performed by virtue of his or her position; and
|
|
|
•
|
all other important information pertaining to these actions.
|
The duty of loyalty requires an office holder to act in good faith and for the benefit of the company, and includes the duty to:
|
|
•
|
refrain from any act involving a conflict of interest between the performance of his or her duties in the company and his or her other duties or personal affairs;
|
|
|
•
|
refrain from any activity that is competitive with the business of the company;
|
|
|
•
|
refrain from exploiting any business opportunity of the company for the purpose of gaining a personal advantage for himself or herself or others; and
|
|
|
•
|
disclose to the company any information or documents relating to the company’s affairs which the office holder received as a result of his or her position as an office holder.
|
We may approve an act performed in breach of the duty of loyalty of an office holder provided that the office holder acted in good faith, the act or its approval does not harm the company, and the office holder discloses his or her personal interest, as described below.
Disclosure of personal interests of an office holder and approval of acts and transactions
The Israeli Companies Law requires that an office holder promptly disclose to the company any personal interest that he or she may have and all related material information or documents relating to any existing or proposed transaction by the company. An interested office holder’s disclosure must be made promptly and in any event no later than the first meeting of the board of directors at which the transaction is considered. An office holder is not obliged to disclose such information if the personal interest of the office holder derives solely from the personal interest of his or her relative in a transaction that is not considered as an extraordinary transaction.
The term personal interest is defined under the Israeli Companies Law to include the personal interest of a person in an action or in the business of a company, including the personal interest of such person’s relative or the interest of any corporation in which the person is an interested party, but excluding a personal interest stemming solely from the fact of holding shares in the company. A personal interest furthermore includes the personal interest of a person for whom the office holder holds a voting proxy or the interest of the office holder with respect to his or her vote on behalf of the shareholder for whom he or she holds a proxy even if such shareholder itself has no personal interest in the approval of the matter. An office holder is not, however, obliged to disclose a personal interest if it derives solely from the personal interest of his or her relative in a transaction that is not considered an extraordinary transaction.
Under the Israeli Companies Law, an extraordinary transaction which requires approval is defined as any of the following:
|
|
•
|
a transaction other than in the ordinary course of business;
|
|
|
•
|
a transaction that is not on market terms; or
|
|
|
•
|
a transaction that may have a material impact on the company’s profitability, assets or liabilities.
|
Under the Israeli Companies Law, once an office holder has complied with the disclosure requirement described above, a company may approve a transaction between the company and the office holder or a third party in which the office holder has a personal interest, or approve an action by the office holder that would otherwise be deemed a breach of duty of loyalty. However, a company may not approve a transaction or action that is adverse to the company’s interest or that is not performed by the office holder in good faith.
Under the Israeli Companies Law, unless the articles of association of a company provide otherwise, a transaction with an office holder, a transaction with a third party in which the office holder has a personal interest, and an action of an office holder that would otherwise be deemed a breach of duty of loyalty requires approval by the board of directors. Our articles of association do not provide otherwise. If the transaction or action considered is (i) an extraordinary transaction, (ii) an action of an office holder that would otherwise be deemed a breach of duty of loyalty and may have a material impact on a company’s profitability, assets or liabilities, (iii) an undertaking to indemnify or insure an office holder who is not a director, or (iv) for matters considered an undertaking concerning the terms of compensation of an office holder who is not a director, including, an undertaking to indemnify or insure such office holder, then audit committee approval is required prior to approval by the board of directors. Arrangements regarding the compensation, indemnification or insurance of a director require the approval of the audit committee, board of directors and shareholders, in that order.
A director who has a personal interest in a matter that is considered at a meeting of the board of directors or the audit committee may generally not be present at the meeting or vote on the matter unless a majority of the directors or members of the audit committee have a personal interest in the matter, or, unless the chairman of the audit committee or board of directors (as applicable) determines that he or she should be present to present the transaction that is subject to approval. If a majority of the directors have a personal interest in the matter, such matter also requires approval of the shareholders of the company.
Disclosure of personal interests of a controlling shareholder and approval of transactions
Under the Israeli Companies Law and a recent amendment thereto, the disclosure requirements that apply to an office holder also apply to a controlling shareholder of a public company. See “— Audit Committee” for a definition of controlling shareholder. Extraordinary transactions with a controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, including a private placement in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, as well as transactions for the provision of services whether directly or indirectly by a controlling shareholder or his or her relative, or a company such controlling shareholder controls, and transactions concerning the terms of engagement of a controlling shareholder or a controlling shareholder’s relative, whether as an office holder or an employee, require the approval of the audit committee, the board of directors and a majority of the shares voted by the shareholders of the company participating and voting on the matter in a shareholders’ meeting. In addition, the shareholder approval must fulfill one of the following requirements:
|
|
•
|
at least a majority of the shares held by shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction and are voting at the meeting must be voted in favor of approving the transaction, excluding abstentions; or
|
|
|
•
|
the shares voted by shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction who vote against the transaction represent no more than 2% of the voting rights in the company.
|
To the extent that any such transaction with a controlling shareholder is for a period extending beyond three years, approval is required once every three years, unless the audit committee determines that the duration of the transaction is reasonable given the circumstances related thereto.
Duties of shareholders
Under the Israeli Companies Law, a shareholder has a duty to refrain from abusing its power in the company and to act in good faith and in an acceptable manner in exercising its rights and performing its obligations to the company and other shareholders, including, among other things, voting at general meetings of shareholders on the following matters:
|
|
•
|
an amendment to the articles of association;
|
|
|
•
|
an increase in the company’s authorized share capital;
|
|
|
•
|
a merger; and
|
|
|
•
|
the approval of related party transactions and acts of office holders that require shareholder approval.
|
A shareholder also has a general duty to refrain from discriminating against other shareholders.
The remedies generally available upon a breach of contract will also apply to a breach of the above mentioned duties, and in the event of discrimination against other shareholders, additional remedies are available to the injured shareholder.
In addition, any controlling shareholder, any shareholder that knows that its vote can determine the outcome of a shareholder vote and any shareholder that, under a company’s articles of association, has the power to appoint or prevent the appointment of an office holder, or has another power with respect to a company, is under a duty to act with fairness towards the company. The Israeli Companies Law does not describe the substance of this duty except to state that the remedies generally available upon a breach of contract will also apply in the event of a breach of the duty to act with fairness, taking the shareholder’s position in the company into account.
Exculpation, insurance and indemnification of office holders
Under the Israeli Companies Law, a company may not exculpate an office holder from liability for a breach of the duty of loyalty. An Israeli company may exculpate an office holder in advance from liability to the company, in whole or in part, for damages caused to the company as a result of a breach of duty of care but only if a provision authorizing such exculpation is inserted in its articles of association. Our articles of association include such a provision. An Israeli company may not exculpate a director from liability arising out of a prohibited dividend or distribution to shareholders.
An Israeli company may indemnify an office holder in respect of the following liabilities and expenses incurred for acts performed as an office holder, either in advance of an event or following an event, provided a provision authorizing such indemnification is contained in its articles of association:
|
|
•
|
financial liability imposed on him or her in favor of another person pursuant to a judgment, settlement or arbitrator’s award approved by a court. However, if an undertaking to indemnify an office holder with respect to such liability is provided in advance, then such an undertaking must be limited to events which, in the opinion of the board of directors, can be foreseen based on the company’s activities when the undertaking to indemnify is given, and to an amount or according to criteria determined by the board of directors as reasonable under the circumstances, and such undertaking shall detail the abovementioned events and amount or criteria;
|
|
|
•
|
reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by the office holder as a result of an investigation or proceeding instituted against him or her by an authority authorized to conduct such investigation or proceeding, provided that (1) no indictment was filed against such office holder as a result of such investigation or proceeding; and (2) no financial liability, such as a criminal penalty, was imposed upon him or her as a substitute for the criminal proceeding as a result of such investigation or proceeding or, if such financial liability was imposed, it was imposed with respect to an offense that does not require proof of criminal intent; and
|
|
|
•
|
reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by the office holder or imposed by a court in proceedings instituted against him or her by the company, on its behalf or by a third party or in connection with criminal proceedings in which the office holder was acquitted or as a result of a conviction for an offense that does not require proof of criminal intent.
|
An Israeli company may insure an office holder against the following liabilities incurred for acts performed as an office holder if and to the extent provided in the company’s articles of association:
|
|
•
|
a breach of duty of loyalty to the company, to the extent that the office holder acted in good faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not prejudice the company;
|
|
|
•
|
a breach of duty of care to the company or to a third party, including a breach arising out of the negligent conduct of the office holder; and
|
|
|
•
|
a financial liability imposed on the office holder in favor of a third party.
|
An Israeli company may not indemnify or insure an office holder against any of the following:
|
|
•
|
a breach of duty of loyalty, except to the extent that the office holder acted in good faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not prejudice the company;
|
|
|
•
|
a breach of duty of care committed intentionally or recklessly, excluding a breach arising out of the negligent conduct of the office holder;
|
|
|
•
|
an act or omission committed with intent to derive illegal personal benefit; or
|
|
|
•
|
a fine or forfeit levied against the office holder.
|
Under the Israeli Companies Law, exculpation, indemnification and insurance of office holders must be approved by the audit committee and the board of directors and, with respect to directors, by shareholders.
A recent amendment to the Israeli Securities Law, 5728-1968 (the "Israeli Securities Law"), and a corresponding amendment to the Companies Law, authorizes the Israeli Securities Authority to impose administrative sanctions against companies like ours, and their office holders for certain violations of the Israeli Securities Law or the Israeli Companies Law. These sanctions include monetary sanctions and certain restrictions on serving as a director or senior officer of a public company for certain periods of time. The amendments to the Israeli Securities Law and to the Israeli Companies Law provide that only certain types of such liabilities may be reimbursed by indemnification and insurance. Specifically, legal expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred by an individual in the applicable administrative enforcement proceeding and certain compensation payable to injured parties for damages suffered by them are permitted to be reimbursed via indemnification or insurance, provided that such indemnification and insurance are authorized by the company's articles of association, and receive the requisite corporate approvals.
The amendments to the Israeli Securities Law and to the Israeli Companies Law provide that only certain types of such liabilities may be reimbursed by indemnification and insurance. Specifically, legal expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by an individual in the applicable administrative enforcement proceeding and any compensation payable to injured parties for damages suffered by them (as described in the immediately preceding paragraph) are permitted to be reimbursed via indemnification or insurance, provided that such indemnification and insurance are authorized by the company’s articles of association.
Our articles of association allow us to indemnify and insure our office holders for any liability imposed on them as a consequence of an act (including any omission) which was performed by virtue of being an office holder. In November 2011, our shareholders approved (i) the amendment of our Articles of Association to authorize indemnification and insurance in connection with administrative enforcement proceedings, including without limitation, the specific amendments to the Israeli Securities Law and the Israeli Companies Law described above; and (ii) a new form of indemnification letter with our directors and officers so as to reflect the amendment to our Articles of Association, which new form of letter was also approved (subject to shareholder approval), in October 2011 by our audit committee and board of directors.
Our office holders are currently covered by a directors and officers’ liability insurance policy. As of the date of this offering, no claims for directors and officers’ liability insurance have been filed under this policy and we are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors or officers in which indemnification is sought. Pursuant to the approval of our shareholders which was obtained on November 5, 2009, we carry directors and officers’ insurance covering each of our directors and executive officers for acts and omissions. See also “Certain Transactions and Related Party Transactions — Indemnification Agreements.”
There is no pending litigation or proceeding against any of our directors or officers as to which indemnification is being sought, nor are we aware of any pending or threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification by any director or officer.
Nasdaq Listing Rules and Home Country Practices
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as related rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, requires foreign private issuers, such as us, to comply with various corporate governance practices. In complying with the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, we have elected to follow certain corporate governance practices permitted under the Israeli Companies Law and the rules of the TASE in lieu of compliance with certain corporate governance requirements otherwise required by the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.
In accordance with Israeli law and practice and subject to the exemption set forth in Rule 5615 of the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, we follow the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law, rather than the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, with respect to the following requirements:
|
|
•
|
Distribution of annual and quarterly reports to shareholders
. Under Israeli law we are not required to distribute annual and quarterly reports directly to shareholders and the generally accepted business practice in Israel is not to distribute such reports to shareholders but to make such reports publicly available through the website of the Israeli Securities Authority. In addition, we make our audited financial statements available to our shareholders at our offices and mail such reports to shareholders upon request. As a foreign private issuer, we are generally exempt from the SEC’s proxy solicitation rules.
|
|
|
•
|
Quorum
. While the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market require that the quorum for purposes of any meeting of the holders of a listed company’s common voting stock, as specified in the company’s bylaws, be no less than 33 1/3% of the company’s outstanding common voting stock, under Israeli law, a company is entitled to determine in its articles of association the number of shareholders and percentage of holdings required for a quorum at a shareholders meeting. Our Articles of Association provide that a quorum of two or more shareholders holding at least 25% of the voting rights in person or by proxy is required for commencement of business at a general meeting. However, the quorum set forth in our articles of association with respect to an adjourned meeting consists of any number of shareholders present in person or by proxy.
|
|
|
•
|
Independent Directors
. Our Board of Directors includes two external directors in accordance with the provisions contained in Sections 239-249 of the Israeli Companies Law and Rule 10A-3 of the general rules and regulations promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, rather than a majority of external directors. Israeli law does not require, nor do our independent directors conduct, regularly scheduled meetings at which only they are present. We are required, however, to ensure that all members of our Audit Committee are “independent” under the applicable Nasdaq and SEC criteria for independence (as a foreign private issuer we are not exempt from the SEC independence requirement), and we must also ensure that a majority of the members of our Audit Committee are unaffiliated directors as defined in the Israeli Companies Law. Furthermore, Israeli law does not require, nor do our independent directors conduct, regularly scheduled meetings at which only they are present, which the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market otherwise require.
|
|
|
•
|
Audit Committee
. Our Audit Committee complies with all of the requirements under Israeli law, and is composed of two external directors, which are all of our external directors, and only one other director, who cannot be the chairman of the Board of Directors. Consistent with Israeli law, the independent auditors are elected at a meeting of shareholders instead of being appointed by the Audit Committee.
|
|
|
•
|
Nomination of our Directors
. With the exception of our external directors and directors elected by our Board of Directors due to vacancy, our directors are elected by a general or special meeting of our shareholders, to hold office until they are removed from office by the majority of our shareholders at a general or special meeting of our shareholders. See “— Board of Directors.” The nominations for directors, which are presented to our shareholders, are generally made by our directors, but nominations may be made by one or more of our shareholders as provided in our Articles of Association, under the Israeli Companies law or in an agreement between us and our shareholders. Currently, there is no agreement between us and any shareholder regarding the nomination of directors. In accordance with our Articles of Association, under the Israeli Companies Law, any one or more shareholders holding, in the aggregate, either (1) 5% of our outstanding shares and 1% of our outstanding voting power or (2) 5% of our outstanding voting power, may nominate one or more persons for election as directors at a general or special meeting by delivering a written notice of such shareholder’s intent to make such nomination or nominations to our registered office. Each such notice must set forth all of the details and information as required to be provided in our Articles of Association.
|
|
|
•
|
Compensation of Officers
. Provided that the executive officer does not serve on our board, Israeli law does not require and we do not require that independent members of our Board of Directors determine the compensation of an executive officer. If, however, an executive officer is also a director, the terms of compensation must be approved by our Audit Committee, our Board of Directors and shareholders. Furthermore, if the executive officer is also a controlling shareholder of our company (including an affiliate thereof), the compensation needs to be approved by our Audit Committee, Board of Directors and shareholders, provided that the shareholder approval includes the holders of a majority of the shares held by all shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction and who are voting on the subject matter (with abstentions being disregarded) or, alternatively, the total shares of shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction and who vote against the transaction must not represent more than 2% of the voting rights in our company. To the extent that any such transaction with a controlling shareholder is for a period extending beyond three years, approval is required once every three years, unless our Audit Committee determines that the duration of the transaction is reasonable given the circumstances related thereto. A director or executive officer of an Israeli company may not be present when the company’s audit committee or board of directors discusses or votes upon the terms of his or her compensation, unless the chairman of the audit committee or board of directors (as applicable) determines that he or she should be present to present the transaction that is subject to approval.
|
|
|
•
|
Approval of Related Party Transactions
. All related party transactions are approved in accordance with the requirements and procedures for approval of interested party acts and transactions, set forth in sections 268 to 275 of the Israeli Companies Law, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, which require the approval of the audit committee, board of directors and shareholders, for specified transactions, rather than approval by the audit committee or other independent body of our Board of Directors as required under the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.
|
|
|
•
|
Shareholder Approval
. We seek shareholder approval for all corporate actions requiring such approval in accordance with the requirements of the Israeli Companies Law, which are different or in addition to the requirements for seeking shareholder approval under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635, rather than seeking approval for corporation actions in accordance with such listing rules.
|
D. Employees
As of December 31, 2011, we had 52 employees, all of whom are employed in Israel. Of our employees, 23 hold M.D. or Ph.D. degrees.
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
|||||
|
Management and administration
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
||||
|
Research and development
|
33
|
34
|
37
|
||||
|
Sales and Marketing
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
||||
While none of our employees are party to any collective bargaining agreements, certain provisions of the collective bargaining agreements between the Histadrut (General Federation of Labor in Israel) and the Coordination Bureau of Economic Organizations (including the Industrialists’ Associations) are applicable to our employees by order of the Israel Ministry of Labor. These provisions primarily concern the length of the workday, minimum daily wages for professional workers, pension fund benefits for all employees, insurance for work-related accidents, procedures for dismissing employees, determination of severance pay and other conditions of employment. We generally provide our employees with benefits and working conditions beyond the required minimums.
We have never experienced any employment-related work stoppages and believe our relationship with our employees is good.
E. Beneficial Ownership of Executive Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our outstanding ordinary shares as of February 22, 2012 of each of our directors and executive officers individually and as a group.
|
Number of
|
||||||||
|
Shares
|
||||||||
|
Beneficially
|
Percent of
|
|||||||
|
Held
|
Class
|
|||||||
|
Directors
|
||||||||
|
Aharon Schwartz, Ph.D.
|
– | – | ||||||
|
Raphael Hofstein, Ph.D.
(1)
|
112,500 | * | ||||||
|
Yakov Friedman
|
– | – | ||||||
|
Michael J. Anghel
|
– | – | ||||||
|
Avraham Molcho, M.D.
(2)
|
25,000 | * | ||||||
|
Nurit Benjamini
(3)
|
25,000 | * | ||||||
|
Executive officers
|
||||||||
|
Kinneret Savitsky, Ph.D.
(4)
|
1,172,202 | * | ||||||
|
Moshe Phillip, M.D.
(5)
|
783,124 | * | ||||||
|
Philip Serlin
(6)
|
65,000 | * | ||||||
|
David Malek
(7)
|
– | * | ||||||
|
Leah Klapper
(8)
|
208,799 | * | ||||||
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)
(9)
|
2,391,625 | 1.9 | % | |||||
|
*
|
Less than 1.0%.
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes 112,500 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 87,500 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes 25,000 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 25,000 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Includes 25,000 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 25,000 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Includes 256,170 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 500,000 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Includes 208,161 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 371,350 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Includes 65,000 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 489,200 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Does not include 250,000 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(8)
|
Includes 17,525 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 263,960 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(9)
|
Includes 780,190 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 2,296,566 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
Stock Option Plans
2003 Share Option Plan
In 2003, we adopted the BioLineRx Ltd. 2003 Share Option Plan, or the Plan. The Plan provides for the granting of options and ordinary shares to our directors, employees, consultants and service providers, and to the directors, employees, consultants and service providers of our subsidiaries and affiliates. The Plan provides for options to be issued at the determination of our Board of Directors in accordance with applicable law. As of December 31, 2010, there were 7,026,767 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options under the Plan.
On November 24, 2011, our Board of Directors approved the re-pricing of approximately 3,700,000 outstanding “underwater” employee stock options (out of a total of approximately 6,200,000 stock options outstanding). The weighted average remaining vesting period of the options subject to re-pricing was 1.1 years, with a weighted average exercise price of NIS 4.07 per share. The terms of the re-pricing were as follows: (i) the exercise price of the options was reduced to NIS 1.80 per share and (ii) one additional year of vesting will be added to the remaining vesting period of the options. The re-pricing is not applicable to options which were already vested, and it does not apply to options held by Directors or consultants. With respect to each eligible optionee, the re-pricing terms apply only if the eligible optionee consents to the new terms. Without such consent, the terms remain unchanged (in respect of that optionee). The total compensation cost associated with the re-pricing was approximately NIS 900,000, which is being recorded as an expense over the new vesting period of the re-priced options.
Administration of Our Share Option Plan
Our share option plan is administered by our Audit Committee, which makes recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the granting of options and the terms of option grants, including exercise price, method of payment, vesting schedule, acceleration of vesting and the other matters necessary in the administration of these plans. Options granted under the Plan to eligible employees and office holders are granted under Section 102 of the Israel Income Tax Ordinance pursuant to which the options or the ordinary shares issued upon their exercise must be allocated or issued to a trustee and be held in trust for two years from the date upon which such options were granted, provided that options granted prior to January 1, 2006, or the ordinary shares issued upon their exercise, are subject to being held in trust for two years from the end of the year in which the options are granted. Under Section 102, any tax payable by an employee from the grant or exercise of the options is deferred until the transfer of the options or ordinary shares by the trustee to the employee or upon the sale of the options or ordinary shares, and gains may qualify to be taxed as capital gains at a rate equal to 25%, subject to compliance with specified conditions.
Options granted under our share option plan generally vest over four years, and they expire between seven to 10 years from the grant date. If we terminate an employee for cause, all of the employee’s vested and unvested options expire immediately from the time of delivery of the notice of discharge, unless determined otherwise by the Audit Committee or the Board of Directors. Upon termination of employment for any other reason, including due to death or disability of the employee, vested options may be exercised within three months of the termination date, unless otherwise determined by the Audit Committee or the Board of Directors. Vested options which are not exercised and unvested options return to the pool of reserved ordinary shares under the Plan for reissuance.
In the event of a merger, consolidation, reorganization or similar transaction or our voluntary liquidation or dissolution, all of our unexercised vested options and any unvested options will be automatically terminated. However, in the event of a change of control, or merger, consolidation, reorganization or similar transaction resulting in the acquisition of at least 50% of our voting power, or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, each option holder will be entitled to purchase the number of shares of the other corporation the option holder would have received if he or she had exercised the options immediately prior to such transaction or may sell or exchange their shares received pursuant to the exercise of an option.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following is a description of some of the transactions with related parties to which we, or our subsidiaries, are party. The descriptions provided below are summaries of the material terms of such agreements.
We believe that we have executed all of our transactions with related parties on terms no less favorable to us than those we could have obtained from unaffiliated third parties. We are required by Israeli law to ensure that all future transactions between us and our officers, directors and principal shareholders and their affiliates are approved by a majority of our Board of Directors, including a majority of the independent and disinterested members of our Board of Directors, and that they are on terms no less favorable to us than those that we could obtain from unaffiliated third parties.
Pan Atlantic Bridge Loan Agreement
On January 10, 2007, we entered into a convertible bridge loan agreement with Pan Atlantic Investments Limited, or Pan Atlantic, pursuant to which Pan Atlantic provided us with a $9.0 million convertible loan. Pursuant to the terms of the bridge loan agreement, the $9.0 million loan converted into 6,716,418 of our ordinary shares at a price per share of $1.34 immediately prior to our initial public offering on the TASE.
Early Development Program Agreement
We entered into an agreement with Pan Atlantic pursuant to which Pan Atlantic committed to provide up to $5.0 million of funding for us to in-license and develop early development stage therapeutic candidates. Pursuant to this early development program, we are entitled to request from Pan Atlantic twice a year up to $625,000 for an aggregate of up to approximately $1.25 million per year, unless otherwise agreed by Pan Atlantic, for our early development research projects, provided that we match the program funds at a rate of $0.20 per every dollar invested by Pan Atlantic. Pan Atlantic is not obligated to transfer any funds under this program for any request made after April 1, 2011. Pan Atlantic does not have any rights to any products developed through our early development projects. As part of the agreement, Pan Atlantic will have the right to invest up to $5.0 million in our first public offering outside of Israel.
In-License Agreement with B.G. Negev Technologies
In January 2005, we in-licensed the rights to BL-1040 under a license agreement with B.G. Negev Technologies. Under the agreement, B.G. Negev Technologies granted to us an exclusive, worldwide, sublicensable license to develop, manufacture, market and sell technology relating to our BL-1040 therapeutic candidate. We are required to pay B.G. Negev Technologies 28% of the revenues we receive as consideration in connection with any sublicensing, co-marketing or co-promotion, or a permitted assignment, of BL-1040, which includes the revenues we have and will receive under our licensing agreement with Ikaria. B.G. Negev Technologies may terminate this agreement upon a material breach on our part, including a failure to meet all of the progress milestones using commercially reasonable efforts. At the time we entered into this license agreement, Ilan Leviteh was the chairman of the board of directors of B.G. Negev Technologies and served as an external director on our Board of Directors. See “Business — In-Licensing Agreements — BL-1040.”
We may in-license other technologies from B.G. Negev Technologies in the course of our business, from time to time. However, we have not in-licensed any other technologies from B.G. Negev Technologies in connection with any other therapeutic candidate in our current pipeline.
Agreements with Directors and Officers
Employment Agreements
We have entered into employment agreements with each of our executive officers. See “Management — Compensation.”
Indemnification Agreements
Our Articles of Association permit us to exculpate, indemnify and insure our directors and officeholders to the fullest extent permitted by the Israeli Companies Law. We have entered into agreements with each of our office holders undertaking to indemnify them to the fullest extent permitted by law, including with respect to liabilities resulting from this offering to the extent that these liabilities are not covered by insurance. We have obtained Directors & Officers insurance for each of our officers and directors. See “Management — Compensation.”
PRINCIPAL
SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our outstanding ordinary shares as of the date of this registration statement:
|
|
·
|
each person or group of affiliated persons that, to our knowledge, beneficially owns more than 5.0% of our ordinary shares;
|
|
|
·
|
each of our directors and executive officers individually; and
|
|
|
·
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
|
The beneficial ownership of ordinary shares is based on the 176,056,151 ordinary shares outstanding as of February 22, 2012 and is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes any ordinary shares over which a person exercises sole or shared voting or investment power. For purposes of the table below, we deem shares subject to options or warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012, to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding the options or warrants for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of that person but we do not treat them as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except where otherwise indicated, we believe, based on information furnished to us by such owners, that the beneficial owners of the ordinary shares listed below have sole investment and voting power with respect to such ordinary shares. To our knowledge, none of our shareholders of record are U.S. holders. Our principal shareholders do not have different or special voting rights. Unless otherwise noted below, each shareholder’s address is c/o BioLineRx Ltd., P.O. Box 45158, 19 Hartum Street, Jerusalem 91450, Israel.
|
Shares Beneficially
Owned
|
||||||||
|
Number
|
Percent
|
|||||||
|
Directors
|
||||||||
|
Aharon Schwartz, Ph.D.
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Raphael Hofstein, Ph.D.
(1)
|
112,500 | * | ||||||
|
Yakov Friedman
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Michael J. Anghel
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Avraham Molcho, M.D.
(2)
|
29,167 | * | ||||||
|
Nurit Benjamini
(3)
|
29,167 | * | ||||||
|
Executive officers
|
||||||||
|
Kinneret Savitsky, Ph.D.
(4)
|
1,172,202 | * | ||||||
|
Moshe Phillip, M.D.
(5)
|
783,124 | * | ||||||
|
Philip Serlin
(6)
|
65,000 | * | ||||||
|
David Malek
(7)
|
- | * | ||||||
|
Leah Klapper
(8)
|
208,799 | * | ||||||
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)
(9)
|
2,399,959 | 1.2 | ||||||
|
Principal shareholders:
|
||||||||
|
Pan Atlantic Bank and Trust Limited
(10)
|
37,421,793
|
20.4
|
||||||
|
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
(11)
|
11,889,535 | 5.9 | ||||||
|
Migdal Insurance and Financial Holdings Ltd
(12)
.
|
7,635,424 | 3.8 | ||||||
___________________________
|
*
|
Less than 1.0%.
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes 112,500 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 87,500 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 20, 2012.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes 29,167 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 20,233 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Includes 29,167 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 20,233 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Includes 256,170 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 500,000 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Includes 208,161 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 371,350 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Includes 65,000 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 489,200 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Does not include 250,000 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(8)
|
Includes 17,525 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 263,960 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(9)
|
Includes 717,690 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options within 60 days of February 22, 2012. Does not include 2,003,676 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are not exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 2012.
|
|
|
(10)
|
Based upon information provided by the shareholder in its Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on February 27, 2012. Pan Atlantic Bank and Trust Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of FCMI Financial Corporation (FCMI). All of the outstanding shares of FCMI are owned by Albert D. Friedberg, members of his family and trusts for the benefit of members of his family. Mr. Friedberg retains possession of the voting and dispositive power over the FCMI shares held by members of the Friedberg family and trusts for the benefit of members of his family and, as a result, controls and may be deemed the beneficial owner of 100% of the outstanding shares of and sole controlling person of FCMI. By virtue of his control of FCMI, Mr. Friedberg may be deemed to possess voting and dispositive power over the shares owned directly by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pan Atlantic Bank and Trust Limited. The principal executive offices of Pan Atlantic are at “Whitepark House,” 1st Floor, Whitepark Road, St. Michael BB11135, Barbados, West Indies.
|
|
|
(11)
|
Based upon information provided by the shareholder in its Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2012. Teva is a publicly-traded Israeli company. Its principal executive offices are at 5 Basel Street, PO Box 3190, Petach Tikva, Israel 49131.
|
|
|
(12)
|
Based upon information provided by the shareholder in its Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2012. Migdal Insurance’s principal executive offices are at 4 Efal Street; P.O. Box 3063; Petach Tikva 49512, Israel.
|
|
SELLING
SHAREHOLDERS
The following table shows certain information as of the date of this prospectus regarding the number of ordinary shares underlying the ADSs owned by the selling shareholders and that are included for sale in this prospectus. The table assumes that all ADSs offered for sale in the prospectus are sold.
|
Ordinary Shares Beneficially
|
Ordinary Shares
|
Ordinary Shares
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Owned Before the Offering
|
Offered by Selling
|
After the Offering
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Selling Shareholder
|
Number(1)
|
Percent(2)
|
Shareholders
|
Number
|
Percent(2)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Ayer Capital Partners Kestrel Fund, LP(3)
|
320,750 | (4) | 0.16 | 320,750 | (4) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Ayer Capital Partners Master Fund, L.P.(5)
|
14,524,320 | (6) | 7.18 | 14,524,320 | (6) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Epworth – Ayer Capital(7)
|
889,200 | (8) | 0.44 | 889,200 | (8) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Kingsbrook Opportunities Master Fund LP(9)
|
2,250,000 | (10) | 1.11 | 2,250,000 | (10) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC(11)
|
2,622,380 | (12) | 1.3 | 2,622,380 | (12) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
RRC Biofund, LP(13)
|
3,750,000 | (14) | 1.85 | 3,750,000 | (14) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
DAFNA Lifescience LTD.(15)
|
432,000 | (16) | 0.21 | 432,000 | (16) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
DAFNA Lifescience Market Neutral LTD(17)
|
354,000 | (18) | 0.18 | 354,000 | (18) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
DAFNA Lifescience Select LTD(19)
|
525,200 | (20) | 0.26 | 525,200 | (20) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Empery Asset Master, LTD(21)
|
1,311,200 | (22) | 0.65 | 1,311,200 | (22) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Hartz Capital Investments, LLC(23)
|
1,311,200 | (24) | 0.65 | 1,311,200 | (24) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Senvest Master Fund, LP
|
5,244,750 | (25) | 2.59 | 5,244,750 | (25) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Senvest Israel Partners LP
|
5,244,750 | (26) | 2.59 | 5,244,750 | (26) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Cranshire Capital Master Fund, Ltd.(27)
|
1,720,280 | (28) | 0.85 | 1,720,280 | (28) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Freestone Advantage Partners II, LP(29)
|
115,380 | (30) | 0.06 | 115,380 | (30) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Iroquois Master Fund Ltd.(31)
|
1,500,000 | (32) | 0.74 | 1,500,000 | (32) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Pan Atlantic Bank and Trust Limited
|
37,421,793
|
(33) |
18.50
|
21,000,000 | (34) |
16,421,79
|
8.14 | |||||||||||||
|
Opus Point Healthcare Innovations Fund, LP(35)
|
655,610 | (36) | 0.32 | 655,610 | (36) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Opus Point Healthcare Low Net Fund, LP(37)
|
327,800 | (38) | 0.16 | 327,800 | (38) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Opus Point Healthcare Value Fund, LP(39)
|
327,800 | (40) | 0.16 | 327,800 | (40) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Capital Ventures International(41)
|
5,507,000 | (42) | 2.72 | 5,507,000 | (42) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Nextview Capital LP(43)
|
2,175,000 | (44) | 1.08 | 2,175,000 | (44) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd.(45)
|
1,835660 | (46) | 0.91 | 1,835660 | (46) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Midsummer Small Cap Master, Ltd.(47)
|
2,097,900 | (48) | 1.04 | 2,097,900 | (48) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Prelude Israel Fund
|
524,480 | (49) | 0.26 | 524,480 | (49) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Rockmore Investment Master Fund Ltd.(50)
|
524,490 | (51) | 0.26 | 524,490 | (51) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Whalehaven Capital Fund Ltd.(52)
|
1,573,430 | (53) | 0.78 | 1,573,430 | (53) | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
(1)
|
Number of ordinary shares includes ordinary shares, ordinary shares underlying ADSs, as well as ordinary shares underlying ADSs to be purchased by the exercise of the warrants.
|
|
(2)
|
Percentage ownership calculated based on the number of ordinary shares underlying the ADS, and on 123,613,141 ordinary shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of February 22, 2012. The percentage ownership assumes that all ADSs issued to the investors in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012 will be sold and that all warrants issued to the investors in such private placement have been exercised and the resulting ADSs will be sold.
|
|
(3)
|
Ayer Capital Management, LP, ACM Capital Partners, LLC, Jay Venkatesan, Ayer Capital Partners Master Fund, L.P. and Ayer Capital Partners, LLC may be considered the beneficial owner of any securities deemed to be beneficially owned by Ayer Capital Partners Kestrel Fund, L.P.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes 21,383 ADSs and warrants to purchase 10,692 ADSs purchased by Ayer Capital Partners Kestrel Fund, LP in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(5)
|
Ayer Capital Management, LP, ACM Capital Partners, LLC, Jay Venkatesan and Ayer Capital Partners, LLC may be considered the beneficial owner of any securities deemed to be beneficially owned by Ayer Capital Partners Master Fund, L.P
|
|
(6)
|
Includes 968,288 ADSs and warrants to purchase 484,144 ADSs purchased by Ayer Capital Partners Master Fund, L.P. in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(7)
|
Ayer Capital Management, LP, ACM Capital Partners, LLC, Jay Venkatesan, Ayer Capital Partners Master Fund, L.P. and Ayer Capital Partners, LLC may be considered the beneficial owner of any securities deemed to be beneficially owned by Epworth -- Ayer Capital.
|
|
(8)
|
Includes 59,280 ADSs and warrants to purchase 29,640 ADSs purchased by Epworth -- Ayer Capital in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(9)
|
Kingsbrook Partners LP (“Kingsbrook Partners”) is the investment manager of Kingsbrook Opportunities Master Fund LP (“Kingsbrook Opportunities”) and consequently has voting control and investment discretion over securities held by Kingsbrook Opportunities. Kingsbrook Opportunities GP LLC (“Opportunities GP”) is the general partner of Kingsbrook Opportunities and may be considered the beneficial owner of any securities deemed to be beneficially owned by Kingsbrook Opportunities. KB GP LLC (“GP LLC”) is the general partner of Kingsbrook Partners and may be considered the beneficial owner of any securities deemed to be beneficially owned by Kingsbrook Partners. Ari J. Storch, Adam J. Chill and Scott M. Wallace are the sole managing members of Opportunities GP and GP LLC and as a result may be considered beneficial owners of any securities deemed beneficially owned by Opportunities GP and GP LLC. Each of Kingsbrook Partners, Opportunities GP, GP LLC and Messrs. Storch, Chill and Wallace disclaim beneficial ownership of these securities.
|
|
(10)
|
Includes 150,000 ADSs and warrants to purchase 75,000 ADSs purchased by Kingsbrook Partners in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(11)
|
Josh Scheinfeld and Jonathan Cope, the principals of Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (Lincoln Park Capital”), are deemed to be beneficial owners of all of the securities owned by Lincoln Park Capital. Messrs. Scheinfeld and Cope have shared voting and disposition power over the securities.
|
|
(12)
|
Includes 174,825 ADSs and warrants to purchase 87,413 ADSs purchased by Lincoln Park Capital in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(13)
|
As manager of RRC Management, LLC, the sole general partner of RRC BioFund, LP (“RRC Biofund”), James A. Silverman has the sole authority to vote and dispose of all of the shares held by RRC BioFund.
|
|
(14)
|
Includes 250,000 ADSs and warrants to purchase 125,000 ADSs purchased by RRC Biofund in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(15)
|
Nathan Fischel and Fariba Ghodsian share voting and investment power over these securities.
|
|
(16)
|
Includes 28,800 ADSs and warrants to purchase 14,400 ADSs purchased by DAFNA Lifescience LTD in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(17)
|
Nathan Fischel and Fariba Ghodsian share voting and investment power over these securities.
|
|
(18)
|
Includes 23,600 ADSs and warrants to purchase 11,800 ADSs purchased by DAFNA Lifescience Market Neutral LTD in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(19)
|
Nathan Fischel and Fariba Ghodsian share voting and investment power over these securities.
|
|
(20)
|
Includes 35,013 ADSs and warrants to purchase 17,507 ADSs purchased by DAFNA Lifescience Select LTD in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(21)
|
Empery Asset Management LP, the authorized agent of Empery Asset Master Ltd (“EAM”), has discretionary authority to vote and dispose of the shares held by EAM and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of these shares. Martin Hoe and Ryan Lane, in their capacity as investment managers of Empery Asset Management LP, may also be deemed to have investment discretion and voting power over the shares held by EAM. Mr. Hoe and Mr. Lane disclaim any beneficial ownership of these shares.
|
|
(22)
|
Includes 87,413 ADSs and warrants to purchase 43,707 ADSs purchased by EAM in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(23)
|
Empery Asset Management LP, the authorized agent of Hartz Capital Investments, LLC (“HCI”), has discretionary authority to vote and dispose of the shares held by HCI and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of these shares. Martin Hoe and Ryan Lane, in their capacity as investment managers of Empery Asset Management LP, may also be deemed to have investment discretion and voting power over the shares held by HCI. Mr. Hoe and Mr. Lane disclaim any beneficial ownership of these shares.
|
|
(24)
|
Includes 87,413 ADSs and warrants to purchase 43,707 ADSs purchased by HCI in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(25)
|
Includes 349,650 ADSs and warrants to purchase 174,825 ADSs purchased by Senvest Master Fund, LP in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(26)
|
Includes 349,650 ADSs and warrants to purchase 174,825 ADSs purchased by Senvest Israel Partners LP in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(27)
|
Cranshire Capital Advisors, LLC (“CCA”) is the investment manager of Cranshire Capital Master Fund, Ltd. (“Cranshire Master Fund”) and has voting control and investment discretion over securities held by Cranshire Master Fund. Mitchell P. Kopin (“Mr. Kopin”), the president, the sole member and the sole member of the Board of Managers of CCA, has voting control over CCA. As a result, each of Mr. Kopin and CCA may be deemed to have beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of the securities held by Cranshire Master Fund.
CCA is also the investment manager for a managed account for Freestone Advantage Partners II, LP (“Freestone II”), and CCA has voting control and investment discretion over securities held Freestone II. Mr. Kopin, the president, the sole member and the sole member of the Board of Managers of CCA, has voting control over CCA. As a result, each of Mr. Kopin and CCA also may be deemed to have beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of an additional 115,380 ordinary shares of the issuer, consisting of (iv) 7,692 ADSs of the issuer that are held by Freestone II and (v) 3,846 ADSs of the issuer that are issuable upon exercise of warrants held by Freestone II.
|
|
(28)
|
Includes 114,685 ADSs and warrants to purchase 57,343 ADSs purchased by Cranshire Master Fund in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(29)
|
CCA is the investment manager of a managed account for Freestone II and has voting control and investment discretion over securities held in by Freestone II in such managed account. Mr. Kopin, the president, the sole member and the sole member of the Board of Managers of CCA, has voting control over CCA. As a result, each of Mr. Kopin and CCA may be deemed to have beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of the securities held by Freestone II in such managed account.
CCA is also the investment manager Cranshire Master Fund and CCA has voting control and investment discretion over securities held by Cranshire Master Fund. Mr. Kopin, the president, the sole member and the sole member of the Board of Managers of CCA, has voting control over CCA. As a result, each of Mr. Kopin and CCA may be deemed to have beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of the securities held by Cranshire Master Fund that are described in footnote 27.
|
|
(30)
|
Includes 7,692 ADSs and warrants to purchase 3,846 ADSs purchased by Freestone in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(31)
|
Iroquois Capital Management L.L.C (“Iroquois Capital”) is the investment manager for Iroquois Master Fund, Ltd. (“IMF”). Consequently, Iroquois Capital has voting control and investment discretion over securities held by IMF. As managing members of Iroquois Capital, Joshua Silverman and Richard Abbe make voting and investment decisions on behalf of Iroquois Capital in its capacity as investment manager to IMF. As a result of the foregoing, Mr. Silverman and Mr. Abbe may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of the securities held by IMF. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Mr. Silverman and Mr. Abbe disclaim such beneficial ownership.
|
|
(32)
|
Includes 100,000 ADSs and warrants to purchase 50,000 ADSs purchased by IMF in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(33)
|
Includes 16,421,793 Ordinary Shares owned by Pan Atlantic Bank and Trust Limited (“Pan Atlantic”) as of February 22, 2012, along with 1,400,000 ADSs and warrants to purchase 700,000 ADSs purchased by Pan Atlantic in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(34)
|
Includes 1,400,000 ADSs and warrants to purchase 700,000 ADSs purchased by Pan Atlantic in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(35)
|
Michael S. Weiss exercises sole voting and dispositive power over the securities held by Opus Point Healthcare Innovations Fund, LP.
|
|
(36)
|
Includes 43,707 ADSs and warrants to purchase 21,854 ADSs purchased by Opus Point Healthcare Innovations Fund, LP. in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(37)
|
Michael S. Weiss exercises sole voting and dispositive power over the securities held by Opus Point Healthcare Low Net Fund, LP.
|
|
(38)
|
Includes 21,853 ADSs and warrants to purchase 10,927 ADSs purchased by Opus Point Healthcare Low Net Fund, LP. in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.+
|
|
(39)
|
Michael S. Weiss exercises sole voting and dispositive power over the securities held by Opus Point Healthcare Value Fund, LP.
|
|
(40)
|
Includes 21,853 ADSs and warrants to purchase 10,927 ADSs purchased by Opus Point Healthcare Value Fund, LP. in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(41)
|
Heights Capital Management, Inc., the authorized agent of Capital Ventures International (“CVI”), has discretionary authority to vote and dispose of the shares held by CVI and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of these shares. Martin Kobinger, in his capacity as investment Manager of Heights Capital Management, Inc., may also be deemed to have investment discretion and voting power over the shares held by CVI. Mr. Kobinger disclaims any beneficial ownership of the shares.
|
|
(42)
|
Includes 367,133 ADSs and warrants to purchase 183,567 ADSs purchased by CVI in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(43)
|
Stewart Flink is the portfolio manager of Nextview Capital, LP (“Nextview”) and has the sole voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of Nextview.
|
|
(44)
|
Includes 145,000 ADSs and warrants to purchase 72,500 ADSs purchased by Nextview in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(45)
|
Hudson Bay Capital Management LP, the investment manager of Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. (“Hudson Bay”), has voting and investment power over these securities. Sander Gerber is the managing member of Hudson Bay Capital GP LLC, which is the general partner of Hudson Bay Capital Management LP. Sander Gerber disclaims beneficial ownership over these securities.
|
|
(46)
|
Includes 122,377 ADSs and warrants to purchase 61,189 ADSs purchased by Hudson Bay in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(47)
|
Each of Michel Amsalem and Joshua Thomas, as a Managing Member of Midsummer Small Cap Master, Ltd. (“Midsummer”), has sole voting and dispositive power of the shares beneficially owned by Midsummer.
|
|
(48)
|
Includes 139,860 ADSs and warrants to purchase 69,930 ADSs purchased by Midsummer in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(49)
|
Includes 34,695 ADSs and warrants to purchase 17,483 ADSs purchased by Prelude Israel Fund in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(50)
|
Rockmore Capital, LLC (“Rockmore Capital”) serves as the investment manager to Rockmore Investment Master Fund Ltd (“Rockmore Master Fund”) and in such capacity has investment discretion to vote and dispose of these shares. Mr. Bruce T. Bernstein and Mr. Brian Daly, as officers of Rockmore Capital, are responsible for the portfolio management decisions of Rockmore Master Fund and may be deemed to have investment discretion over these shares. Each of Rockmore Capital, Messrs. Bernstein and Daly, disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
|
|
(51)
|
Includes 34,966 ADSs and warrants to purchase 17,483 ADSs purchased by Rockmore Master Fund in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
|
(52)
|
Michael Finklestein has the voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of Whalehaven Capital Fund Ltd (“Whalehaven”).
|
|
(53)
|
Includes 104,895ADSs and warrants to purchase 52,448 ADSs purchased by Whalehaven in the private placement that closed on February 22, 2012.
|
DESCRIPTION
OF SHARE CAPITAL
The following description of our share capital and provisions of our Articles of Association are summaries and do not purport to be complete.
Ordinary Shares
At February 22, 2012, our authorized share capital consists of 250,000,000 ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.01 per share, of which 176,056,161 shares are issued and outstanding as of February 22, 2012.
All of our outstanding ordinary shares will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. Our ordinary shares are not redeemable and do not have any preemptive rights. Pursuant to Israeli securities laws, a company whose shares are traded on the TASE may not have more than one class of shares (subject to an exception which is not applicable to us), and all outstanding shares must be validly issued and fully paid. Shares and convertible securities may not be issued without the consent of the Israeli Securities Authority and all outstanding shares must be registered for trading on the TASE.
Registration Number and Purposes of the Company
Our number with the Israeli Registrar of Companies is 513398750. Our purpose appears in our Articles of Association and includes every lawful purpose.
Transfer of Shares
Our ordinary shares that are fully paid for are issued in registered form and may be freely transferred under our Articles of Association, unless the transfer is restricted or prohibited by applicable law or the rules of a stock exchange on which the shares are traded. The ownership or voting of our ordinary shares by non-residents of Israel is not restricted in any way by our Articles of Association or the laws of the State of Israel, except for ownership by nationals of some countries that are, or have been, in a state of war with Israel.
Election of Directors
Our ordinary shares do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. As a result, the holders of a majority of the voting power represented at a shareholders meeting have the power to elect all of our directors, subject to the special approval requirements for external directors described under “Management—Board Practices—External Directors.”
Pursuant to our Articles of Association, other than the external directors, for whom special election requirements apply under the Israeli Companies Law, our directors are elected at a general or special meeting of our shareholders and serve on the Board of Directors until they are removed by the majority of our shareholders at a general or special meeting of our shareholders or upon the occurrence of certain events, in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law and our Articles of Association. In addition, our Articles of Association allow our Board of Directors to appoint directors to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors to serve until the next general meeting or special meeting, or earlier if required by our Articles of Association or applicable law. We have held elections for each of our non-external directors at each annual meeting of our shareholders since our initial public offering in Israel. External directors are elected for an initial term of three years and may be removed from office pursuant to the terms of the Israeli Companies Law. See “Management—Board Practices—External Directors.”
Dividend and Liquidation Rights
We may declare a dividend to be paid to the holders of our ordinary shares in proportion to their respective shareholdings. Under the Israeli Companies Law, dividend distributions are determined by the board of directors and do not require the approval of the shareholders of a company unless the company’s articles of association provide otherwise. Our Articles of Association do not require shareholder approval of a dividend distribution and provide that dividend distributions may be determined by our Board of Directors.
Pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law, we may only distribute dividends from, our profits accrued over the previous two years, as defined in the Israeli Companies Law, according to our then last reviewed or audited financial reports, provided that the date of the financial reports is not more than six months prior to the date of distribution, or we may distribute dividends with court approval. In each case, we are only permitted to pay a dividend if there is no reasonable concern that payment of the dividend will prevent us from satisfying our existing and foreseeable obligations as they become due.
In the event of our liquidation, after satisfaction of liabilities to creditors, our assets will be distributed to the holders of our ordinary shares in proportion to their shareholdings. This right, as well as the right to receive dividends, may be affected by the grant of preferential dividend or distribution rights to the holders of a class of shares with preferential rights that may be authorized in the future.
Shareholder Meetings
Under Israeli law, we are required to hold an annual general meeting of our shareholders once every calendar year that must be no later than 15 months after the date of the previous annual general meeting. All meetings other than the annual general meeting of shareholders are referred to as special meetings. Our Board of Directors may call special meetings whenever it sees fit, at such time and place, within or outside of Israel, as it may determine. In addition, the Israeli Companies Law and our Articles of Association provide that our Board of Directors is required to convene a special meeting upon the written request of (a) any two of our directors or one quarter of our Board of Directors or (b) one or more shareholders holding, in the aggregate, either (1) 5% of our outstanding shares and 1% of our outstanding voting power or (2) 5% of our outstanding voting power.
Subject to the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder, shareholders entitled to participate and vote at general meetings are the shareholders of record on a date to be decided by the board of directors, which may be between four and 40 days prior to the date of the meeting. Furthermore, the Israeli Companies Law and our Articles of Association require that resolutions regarding the following matters must be passed at a general meeting of our shareholders:
|
|
·
|
amendments to our Articles of Association;
|
|
|
·
|
appointment or termination of our auditors;
|
|
|
·
|
appointment of directors and appointment and dismissal of external directors;
|
|
|
·
|
approval of acts and transactions requiring general meeting approval pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law;
|
|
|
·
|
director compensation, indemnification and change of the principal executive officer;
|
|
|
·
|
increases or reductions of our authorized share capital;
|
|
|
·
|
a merger; and
|
|
|
·
|
the exercise of our Board of Director’s powers by a general meeting, if our Board of Directors is unable to exercise its powers and the exercise of any of its powers is required for our proper management.
|
The Israeli Companies Law requires that a notice of any annual or special shareholders meeting be provided at least 21 days prior to the meeting and if the agenda of the meeting includes the appointment or removal of directors, the approval of transactions with office holders or interested or related parties, or an approval of a merger, notice must be provided at least 35 days prior to the meeting.
The Israeli Companies Law does not allow shareholders of publicly traded companies to approve corporate matters by written consent. Consequently, our Articles of Association does not allow shareholders to approve corporate matters by written consent.
Voting Rights
Quorum Requirements
Pursuant to our Articles of Association, holders of our ordinary shares have one vote for each ordinary share held on all matters submitted to a vote before the shareholders at a general meeting. The quorum required for our general meetings of shareholders consists of at least two shareholders present in person, by proxy or written ballot who hold or represent between them at least 25% of the total outstanding voting rights. A meeting adjourned for lack of a quorum is adjourned to the same day in the following week at the same time and place or on a later date if so specified in the summons or notice of the meeting. At the reconvened meeting, any number of our shareholders present in person or by proxy shall constitute a lawful quorum.
Vote Requirements
Our Articles of Association provide that all resolutions of our shareholders require a simple majority vote, unless otherwise required by applicable law.
Israeli law provides that a shareholder of a public company may vote in a meeting and in a class meeting by means of a written ballot in which the shareholder indicates how he or she votes on resolutions relating to the following matters:
|
|
·
|
an appointment or removal of directors;
|
|
|
·
|
an approval of transactions with office holders or interested or related parties;
|
|
|
·
|
an approval of a merger or any other matter in respect of which there is a provision in the articles of association providing that decisions of the general meeting may also be passed by written ballot;
|
|
|
·
|
authorizing the chairman of the board of directors or his relative to act as the company’s chief executive officer or act with such authority; or authorize the company’s chief executive officer or his relative to act as the chairman of the board of directors or act with such authority; and
|
|
|
·
|
other matters which may be prescribed by Israel’s Minister of Justice.
|
The provision allowing the vote by written ballot does not apply where the voting power of the controlling shareholder is sufficient to determine the vote. Our Articles of Association provides that our Board of Directors may prevent voting by means of a written ballot and this determination is required to be stated in the notice convening the general meeting.
The Israeli Companies Law provides that a shareholder, in exercising his or her rights and performing his or her obligations toward the company and its other shareholders, must act in good faith and in a customary manner, and avoid abusing his or her power. This is required when voting at general meetings on matters such as changes to the articles of association, increasing the company’s registered capital, mergers and approval of related party transactions. A shareholder also has a general duty to refrain from depriving any other shareholder of its rights as a shareholder. In addition, any controlling shareholder, any shareholder who knows that its vote can determine the outcome of a shareholder vote and any shareholder who, under the company’s articles of association, can appoint or prevent the appointment of an office holder, is required to act with fairness towards the company. The Israeli Companies Law does not describe the substance of this duty except to state that the remedies generally available upon a breach of contract will also apply to a breach of the duty to act with fairness, and, to the best of our knowledge, there is no binding case law that addresses this subject directly.
Resolutions
Unless otherwise stated under the Israeli Companies Law, or provided in a company’s articles of association, a resolution at a shareholders meeting requires approval by a simple majority of the voting rights represented at the meeting, in person, by proxy or written ballot, and voting on the resolution. Under the Israeli Companies Law, unless otherwise provided in a company’s articles of association or under applicable law, all resolutions of the shareholders of a company require a simple majority. A resolution for the voluntary winding up of the company requires the approval of holders of 75% of the voting rights represented at the meeting, in person, by proxy or by written ballot and voting on the resolution. For information regarding the majority required for approval of related party transactions, see “Management—Approval of Related Party Transactions Under Israeli Law.”
Access
to
Corporate
Records
Under the Israeli Companies Law, all shareholders of a company generally have the right to review minutes of the company’s general meetings, its shareholders register and principal shareholders register, articles of association, financial statements and any document it is required by law to file publicly with the Israeli Companies Registrar and the Israeli Securities Authority. Any of our shareholders may request access to review any document in our possession that relates to any action or transaction with a related party, interested party or office holder that requires shareholder approval under the Israeli Companies Law. We may deny a request to review a document if we determine that the request was not made in good faith, that the document contains a commercial secret or a patent or that the document’s disclosure may otherwise prejudice our interests.
Modification of Class Rights
The rights attached to any class of share, such as voting, liquidation and dividend rights, may be amended by unanimous written consent of the holders of the issued shares of that class, or by adoption of a resolution by the holders of a majority of the shares of that class present at a separate class meeting.
Acquisitions Under Israeli Law
Full Tender Offer
A person wishing to acquire shares of a public Israeli company and who would as a result hold over 90% of the target company’s issued and outstanding share capital is required by the Israeli Companies Law to make a tender offer to all of the company’s shareholders for the purchase of all of the issued and outstanding shares of the company. A person wishing to acquire shares of a public Israeli company and who would as a result hold over 90% of the issued and outstanding share capital of a certain class of shares is required to make a tender offer to all of the shareholders who hold shares of the same class for the purchase of all of the issued and outstanding shares of the same class. If the shareholders who do not accept the offer hold less than 5% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the company or of the applicable class, all of the shares that the acquirer offered to purchase will be transferred to the acquirer by operation of law (provided that a majority of the offerees that do not have a personal interest in such tender offer shall have approved the tender offer, except that if the total votes to reject the tender offer represent less than 2% of the company’s issued and outstanding share capital, in the aggregate, approval by a majority of the offerees that do not have a personal interest in such tender offer is not required to complete the tender offer). However, a shareholder that had its shares so transferred may petition the court within three months from the date of acceptance of the full tender offer, whether or not such shareholder agreed to the tender, to determine whether the tender offer was for less than fair value and whether the fair value should be paid as determined by the court. If the shareholders who did not accept the tender offer hold 5% or more of the issued and outstanding share capital of the company or of the applicable class, the acquirer may not acquire shares of the company that will increase its holdings to more than 90% of the company’s issued and outstanding share capital or of the applicable class from shareholders who accepted the tender offer.
Special Tender Offer
The Israeli Companies Law provides that an acquisition of shares of a public Israeli company must be made by means of a special tender offer if as a result of the acquisition the purchaser would become a holder of 25% or more of the voting rights in the company, unless one of the exemptions in the Israeli Companies Law is met. This rule does not apply if there is already another holder of at least 25% of the voting rights in the company. Similarly, the Israeli Companies Law provides that an acquisition of shares in a public company must be made by means of a tender offer if as a result of the acquisition the purchaser would become a holder of 45% or more of the voting rights in the company, if there is no other shareholder of the company who holds 45% or more of the voting rights in the company, unless one of the exemptions in the Israeli Companies Law is met.
A special tender offer must be extended to all shareholders of a company but the offeror is not required to purchase shares representing more than 5% of the voting power attached to the company’s outstanding shares, regardless of how many shares are tendered by shareholders. A special tender offer may be consummated only if (i) at least 5% of the voting power attached to the company’s outstanding shares will be acquired by the offeror and (ii) the number of shares tendered in the offer exceeds the number of shares whose holders objected to the offer.
If a special tender offer is accepted, then the purchaser or any person or entity controlling it or under common control with the purchaser or such controlling person or entity may not make a subsequent tender offer for the purchase of shares of the target company and may not enter into a merger with the target company for a period of one year from the date of the offer, unless the purchaser or such person or entity undertook to effect such an offer or merger in the initial special tender offer.
Merger
The Israeli Companies Law permits merger transactions if approved by each party’s board of directors and, unless certain requirements described under the Israeli Companies Law are met, a majority of each party’s shares voted on the proposed merger at a Shareholders’ meeting called with at least 35 days’ prior notice.
For purposes of the shareholder vote, unless a court rules otherwise, the merger will not be deemed approved if a majority of the shares represented at the shareholders meeting that are held by parties other than the other party to the merger, or by any person who holds 25% or more of the outstanding shares or the right to appoint 25% or more of the directors of the other party, vote against the merger. If the transaction would have been approved but for the separate approval of each class or the exclusion of the votes of certain shareholders as provided above, a court may still approve the merger upon the request of holders of at least 25% of the voting rights of a company, if the court holds that the merger is fair and reasonable, taking into account the value of the parties to the merger and the consideration offered to the shareholders.
Upon the request of a creditor of either party to the proposed merger, the court may delay or prevent the merger if it concludes that there exists a reasonable concern that, as a result of the merger, the surviving company will be unable to satisfy the obligations of any of the parties to the merger, and may further give instructions to secure the rights of creditors.
In addition, a merger may not be completed unless at least 50 days have passed from the date that a proposal for approval of the merger was filed by each party with the Israeli Registrar of Companies and 30 days have passed from the date the merger was approved by the shareholders of each party.
Anti-Takeover Measures Under Israeli Law
The Israeli Companies Law allows us to create and issue shares having rights different from those attached to our ordinary shares, including shares providing certain preferred rights, distributions or other matters and shares having preemptive rights. As of the date of this prospectus, we do not have any authorized or issued shares other than our ordinary shares. In the future, if we do create and issue a class of shares other than ordinary shares, such class of shares, depending on the specific rights that may be attached to them, may delay or prevent a takeover or otherwise prevent our shareholders from realizing a potential premium over the market value of their ordinary shares. The authorization of a new class of shares will require an amendment to our Articles of Association which requires the prior approval of the holders of a majority of our shares at a general meeting. In addition, the rules and regulations of the TASE also limit the terms permitted with respect to a new class of shares and prohibit any such new class of shares from having voting rights. Shareholders voting in such meeting will be subject to the restrictions provided in the Israeli Companies Law as described above in “—Voting Rights.”
Borrowing Powers
Pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law and our Articles of Association, our Board of Directors may exercise all powers and take all actions that are not required under law or under our Articles of Association to be exercised or taken by our shareholders, including the power to borrow money for company purposes.
Changes in Capital
Our Articles of Association enable us to increase or reduce our share capital. Any such changes are subject to the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law and must be approved by a resolution duly passed by our shareholders at a general or special meeting by voting on such change in the capital. In addition, transactions that have the effect of reducing capital, such as the declaration and payment of dividends in the absence of sufficient retained earnings and profits and an issuance of shares for less than their nominal value, require a resolution of our Board of Directors and court approval.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our ordinary shares in Israel is Bank Leumi Nominee Company Ltd. (Hevra Le-Rishumim of Bank Leumi Le-Israel Ltd.). The Depositary and Registrar for the ADSs is The Bank of New York Mellon.
Description of the ADSs
Each of our American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, represents 10 of our ordinary shares. Our ADSs will trade on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
The form of the deposit agreement for the ADS and the form of American Depositary Receipt (ADR) that represents an ADS have been incorporated by reference as exhibits to this registration statement on Form F-1. Copies of the deposit agreement are available for inspection at the principal office of The Bank of New York Mellon, located at 101 Barclay Street, New York, New York 10286, and at the principal office of our custodians, Bank Leumi Le-Israel, 34 Yehuda Halevi St., Tel-Aviv 65546, Israel and Bank Hapoalim B.M., 104 Hayarkon Street, Tel Aviv 63432, Israel.
Dividends, Other Distributions and Rights
Amounts distributed to ADS holders will be reduced by any taxes or other governmental charges required to be withheld by the custodian or the Depositary. If the Depositary determines that any distribution in cash or property is subject to any tax or governmental charges that the Depositary or the custodian is obligated to withhold, the Depositary may use the cash or sell or otherwise dispose of all or a portion of that property to pay the taxes or governmental charges. The Depositary will then distribute the balance of the cash and/or property to the ADS holders entitled to the distribution, in proportion to their holdings.
Cash dividends and cash distributions.
The Depositary will convert into dollars all cash dividends and other cash distributions that it or the custodian receives in a foreign currency. The Depositary will distribute to the ADS holders the amount it receives, after deducting any currency conversion expenses. If the Depositary determines that any foreign currency it receives cannot be converted and transferred on a reasonable basis, it may distribute the foreign currency (or an appropriate document evidencing the right to receive the currency), or hold that foreign currency uninvested, without liability for interest, for the accounts of the ADS holders entitled to receive it.
Distributions of ordinary shares.
If we distribute ordinary shares as a dividend or free distribution, the Depositary may, with our approval, and will, at our request, distribute to ADS holders new ADSs representing the ordinary shares. The Depositary will distribute only whole ADSs. It will sell the ordinary shares that would have required it to use fractional ADSs and then distribute the proceeds in the same way it distributes cash. If the Depositary deposits the ordinary shares but does not distribute additional ADSs, the existing ADSs will also represent the new ordinary shares.
If holders of ordinary shares have the option of receiving a dividend in cash or in shares, we may also grant that option to ADS holders.
Other distributions.
If the Depositary or the custodian receives a distribution of anything other than cash or shares, the Depositary will distribute the property or securities to the ADS holder, in proportion to such holder’s holdings. If the Depositary determines that it cannot distribute the property or securities in this manner or that it is not feasible to do so, then, after consultation with us, it may distribute the property or securities by any means it thinks is equitable and practical, or it may sell the property or securities and distribute the net proceeds of the sale to the ADS holders.
Rights to subscribe for additional ordinary shares and other rights.
If we offer our holders of ordinary shares any rights to subscribe for additional ordinary shares or any other rights, the Depositary will, if requested by us:
|
|
•
|
make the rights available to all or certain holders of ADSs, by means of warrants or otherwise, if lawful and practically feasible; or
|
|
|
•
|
if it is not lawful or practically feasible to make the rights available, attempt to sell those rights or warrants or other instruments.
|
In that case, the Depositary will allocate the net proceeds of the sales to the account of the ADS holders entitled to the rights. The allocation will be made on an averaged or other practicable basis without regard to any distinctions among holders.
If registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is required in order to offer or sell to the ADS holders the securities represented by any rights, the Depositary will not make the rights available to ADS holders unless a registration statement is in effect or such securities are exempt from registration. We do not, however, have any obligation to file a registration statement or to have a registration statement declared effective. If the Depositary cannot make any rights available to ADS holders and cannot dispose of the rights and make the net proceeds available to ADS holders, then it will allow the rights to lapse, and the ADS holders will not receive any value for them.
Voting of the underlying shares.
Under the deposit agreement, an ADS holder is entitled, subject to any applicable provisions of Israeli law, our articles of association and bylaws and the deposited securities, to exercise voting rights pertaining to the shares represented by its ADSs. The Depositary will send to ADS holders such information as is contained in the notice of meeting that the Depositary receives from us, as well as a statement that holders of as the close of business on the specified record date will be entitled to instruct the Depositary as to the exercise of voting rights and a statement as to the manner in which the such instructions may be given.
Changes affecting deposited securities.
If there is any change in nominal value or any split - up, consolidation, cancellation or other reclassification of deposited securities, or any recapitalization, reorganization, business combination or consolidation or sale of assets involving us, then any securities that the Depositary receives in respect of deposited securities will become new deposited securities. Each ADS will automatically represent its share of the new deposited securities, unless the Depositary delivers new ADSs as described in the following sentence. The Depositary may, with our approval, and will, at our request, distribute new ADSs or ask ADS holders to surrender their outstanding ADSs in exchange for new ADSs describing the new deposited securities.
Amendment of the deposit agreement.
The Depositary and we may agree to amend the form of the ADSs and the deposit agreement at any time, without the consent of the ADS holders. If the amendment adds or increases any fees or charges (other than taxes or other governmental charges) or prejudices an important right of ADS holders, it will not take effect as to outstanding ADSs until three months after the Depositary has sent the ADS holders a notice of the amendment. At the expiration of that three-month period, each ADS holder will be considered by continuing to hold its ADSs to agree to the amendment and to be bound by the deposit agreement as so amended. The Depositary and we may not amend the deposit agreement or the form of ADSs to impair the ADS holder’s right to surrender its ADSs and receive the ordinary shares and any other property represented by the ADSs, except to comply with mandatory provisions of applicable law.
Termination of the deposit agreement.
The Depositary will terminate the deposit agreement if we ask it to do so and will notify the ADS holders at least 30 days before the date of termination. The Depositary may also terminate the deposit agreement if it resigns and a successor depositary has not been appointed by us and accepted its appointment within 60 days after the Depositary has given us notice of its resignation. After termination of the deposit agreement, the Depositary will no longer register transfers of ADSs, distribute dividends to the ADS holders, accept deposits of ordinary shares, give any notices, or perform any other acts under the deposit agreement whatsoever, except that the Depositary will continue to:
|
|
•
|
collect dividends and other distributions pertaining to deposited securities;
|
|
|
•
|
sell rights as described under the heading “Dividends, other distributions and rights — Rights to subscribe for additional shares and other rights” above; and
|
|
|
•
|
deliver deposited securities, together with any dividends or other distributions received with respect thereto and the net proceeds of the sale of any rights or other property, in exchange for surrendered ADSs.
|
Four months after termination, the Depositary may sell the deposited securities and hold the proceeds of the sale, together with any other cash then held by it, for the pro rata benefit of ADS holders that have not surrendered their ADSs. The Depositary will not have liability for interest on the sale proceeds or any cash it holds.
Charges of Depositary
We will pay the fees, reasonable expenses and out-of-pocket charges of the Depositary and those of any registrar only in accordance with agreements in writing entered into between us and the Depositary from time to time. The following charges shall be incurred by any party depositing or withdrawing ordinary shares or by any party surrendering ADSs or to whom ADSs are issued (including, without limitation, issuance pursuant to a stock dividend or stock split declared by us or an exchange of stock regarding the ADSs or deposited ordinary shares or a distribution of ADSs pursuant to the terms of the deposit agreement):
|
(1)
|
taxes and other governmental charges;
|
|
|
(2)
|
any applicable transfer or registration fees;
|
|
|
(3)
|
certain cable, telex and facsimile transmission charges as provided in the Deposit Agreement;
|
|
|
(4)
|
any expenses incurred in the conversion of foreign currency;
|
|
|
(5)
|
a fee of $5.00 or less per 100 ADSs (or a portion thereof) for the execution and delivery of ADSs and the surrender of ADSs;
|
|
|
(6)
|
a fee of $.05 or less per ADS (or portion thereof) for any cash distribution made pursuant to the Deposit Agreement;
|
|
|
(7)
|
a fee for the distribution of securities pursuant to the Deposit Agreement;
|
|
|
(8)
|
in addition to any fee charged under clause 6, a fee of $.05 or less per ADS (or portion thereof) per annum for depositary services, which will be payable as provided in clause 10 below;
|
|
|
(9)
|
a fee for the distribution of proceeds of rights that the Depositary sells pursuant to the Deposit Agreement; and
|
|
|
(10)
|
any other charges payable by the Depositary, any of the Depositary's agents, or the agents of the Depositary's agents in connection with the servicing of Shares or other Deposited Securities.
|
The Depositary may own and deal in our securities and in our ADSs.
Liability of Holders for Taxes, Duties or Other Charges
Any tax or other governmental charge with respect to ADSs or any deposited ordinary shares represented by any ADS shall be payable by the holder of such ADS to the Depositary. The Depositary may refuse to effect transfer of such ADS or any withdrawal of deposited ordinary shares represented by such ADS until such payment is made, and may withhold any dividends or other distributions or may sell for the account of the holder any part or all of the deposited ordinary shares represented by such ADS and may apply such dividends or distributions or the proceeds of any such sale in payment of any such tax or other governmental charge and the holder of such ADS shall remain liable for any deficiency.
Description of the Warrants
The following is a brief summary of the warrants and is subject in all respects to the provisions contained in the warrants, the form of was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 6-K dated February 15, 2012.
Exercisability
. Holders may exercise warrants at any time until 11:59 p.m., New York time, on February 22, 2017. The warrants are exercisable, at the option of each holder, in whole or in part, by delivering to us a duly executed exercise notice accompanied by payment in full for the number of shares of our common stock purchased upon such exercise (except in the case of a cashless exercise in limited circumstances discussed below).
Cashless Exercise
. If, and only if, a registration statement covering the issuance of the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is not effective at the time of exercise of the warrants, the holder may, at its option, exercise its warrants on a cashless basis. When exercised on a cashless basis, a portion of the warrant is cancelled in payment of the purchase price payable in respect of the number of shares of our common stock purchasable upon such exercise.
Exercise Price
. The exercise price of common stock purchasable upon exercise of the warrants is $3.57 per share. The exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of recapitalization events, stock dividends, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting our common stock, and also upon any distributions of assets, including cash, stock or other property to our stockholders.
Transferability
. The warrants may be transferred at the option of the holder upon surrender of the warrants with the appropriate instruments of transfer.
Purchase Rights, Fundamental Transactions and Change of Control
. If we sell or grant any rights to purchase stock, warrants or securities or other property to our stockholders on a pro rata basis, we will provide the holders of warrants with the right to acquire, upon the same terms, the securities subject to such purchase rights as though the warrant had been exercised immediately prior to the declaration of such rights. If we consummate any fundamental transaction, as described in the warrants and generally including any consolidation or merger into another corporation, the consummation of a transaction whereby another entity acquires more than 50% of our outstanding common stock, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or another transaction in which our common stock is converted into or exchanged for other securities or other consideration, the holder of warrants will thereafter receive upon exercise of the warrants the securities or other consideration to which a holder of the number of shares of common stock then deliverable upon the exercise or conversion of such warrants would have been entitled upon such consolidation, merger or other transaction.
Exchange Listing
. We do not plan on making an application to list the warrants on the Nasdaq Capital Market, any national securities exchange or other nationally recognized trading system. Our ADSs underlying the warrants are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
Rights as Stockholder
. Except as otherwise provided in the warrants (such as the rights described above of a warrant holder upon our sale or grant of any rights to purchase shares, warrants or securities or other property to our shareholders on a pro rata basis) or by virtue of such holder’s ownership of our ordinary shares, the holders of the warrants do not have the rights or privileges of holders of our ordinary shares, including any voting rights, until they exercise their warrants.
Fractional Shares
. No fractional ADSs will be issued upon the exercise of the warrants. If any fractional share of an ADS would, except for the provisions of the prior sentence, be deliverable upon such exercise, the Company, in lieu of delivering such fractional share, shall pay to the exercising Holder an amount in cash equal to the market price such fractional ADS on the date of exercise.
The following description is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of all tax consequences relating to the ownership or disposition of our ordinary shares or ADSs, both referred to in below as the Shares. You should consult your own tax advisor concerning the tax consequences of your particular situation, as well as any tax consequences that may arise under the laws of any state, local, foreign, including Israeli, or other taxing jurisdiction.
Israeli Tax Considerations
The following is a summary of the material Israeli tax laws applicable to us. This section also contains a discussion of material Israeli tax consequences concerning the ownership and disposition of our Shares. This summary does not discuss all the aspects of Israeli tax law that may be relevant to a particular investor in light of his or her personal investment circumstances or to some types of investors subject to special treatment under Israeli law. Examples of this kind of investor include residents of Israel or traders in securities who are subject to special tax regimes not covered in this discussion. Because certain parts of this discussion are based on new tax legislation that has not yet been subject to judicial or administrative interpretation, we cannot assure you that the appropriate tax authorities or the courts will accept the views expressed in this discussion.
General Corporate Tax Structure in Israel
Israeli companies are generally subject to a corporate tax at the rate of 24% of their taxable income in 2011 and 25% in 2012. Capital gains derived by an Israeli company are generally subject to tax at a rate of 25%.
Tax Benefits and Grants for Research and Development
Israeli tax law allows, under certain conditions, a tax deduction for research and development expenditures, including capital expenditures, for the year in which they are incurred. These expenses must relate to scientific research and development projects and must be approved by the relevant Israeli government ministry, determined by the field of research. Furthermore, the research and development must be for the promotion of the company and carried out by or on behalf of the company seeking such tax deduction. The amount of such deductible expenses is reduced by the sum of any funds received through government grants for the funding of the scientific research and development projects. No deduction under these research and development deduction rules is allowed if such deduction is related to an expense invested in an asset depreciable under the general depreciation rules of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1961. Expenditures not so approved are deductible in equal amounts over three years.
On a yearly basis, we evaluate the applicability of the above tax deduction for research and development expenditures and, based on our evaluation, determine whether to apply to the OCS for approval of a tax deduction. There can be no assurance that any application for a tax deduction will be accepted.
Taxation of our Shareholders
Capital Gains Taxes Applicable to Non-Israeli Resident Shareholders
. Shareholders that are not Israeli residents are generally exempt from Israeli capital gains tax on any gains derived from the sale, exchange or disposition of our Shares, provided that such shareholders did not acquire their Shares prior to our initial public offering on the TASE and such gains were not derived from a permanent establishment or business activity of such shareholders in Israel. However, non-Israeli corporations will not be entitled to the foregoing exemptions if an Israeli resident (a) has a controlling interest of 25% or more in such non-Israeli corporation or (b) is the beneficiary of or is entitled to 25% or more of the revenues or profits of such non-Israeli corporation, whether directly or indirectly.
In addition, under the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty, the sale, exchange or disposition of our Shares by a shareholder who is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty) holding the Shares as a capital asset is exempt from Israeli capital gains tax unless either (1) the shareholder holds, directly or indirectly, shares representing 10% or more of our voting capital during any part of the 12-month period preceding such sale, exchange or disposition or (2) the capital gains arising from such sale are attributable to a permanent establishment of the shareholder located in Israel. In either case, the sale, exchange or disposition of Shares would be subject to Israeli tax, to the extent applicable; however, under the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty, the U.S. resident would be permitted to claim a credit for the tax against the U.S. federal income tax imposed with respect to the sale, exchange or
disposition, subject to the limitations in U.S. laws applicable to foreign tax credits. The U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty does not relate to U.S. state or local taxes.
Shareholders may be required to demonstrate that they are exempt from tax on their capital gains in order to avoid withholding at source at the time of sale.
Taxation of Non-Israeli Shareholders on Receipt of Dividends
. Non-residents of Israel are generally subject to Israeli income tax on the receipt of dividends paid on our Shares at the rate of 25%, which tax will be withheld at the source, unless a different rate is provided in a tax treaty between Israel and the shareholder’s country of residence. With respect to a person who is a “substantial shareholder” at the time receiving the dividend or on any date in the 12 months preceding such date, the applicable tax rate is 30%. A “substantial shareholder” is generally a person who alone, or together with his relative or another person who collaborates with him on a permanent basis, holds, directly or indirectly, at least 10% of any of the “means of control” of the corporation. “Means of control” generally include the right to vote, receive profits, nominate a director or an officer, receive assets upon liquidation, or order someone who holds any of the aforesaid rights how to act, and all regardless of the source of such right. Under the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty, the maximum rate of tax withheld in Israel on dividends paid to a holder of our Shares who is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty) is 25%. However, generally, the maximum rate of withholding tax on dividends that are paid to a U.S. corporation holding 10% or more of our outstanding voting capital throughout the tax year in which the dividend is distributed as well as the previous tax year is 12.5%.
A non-resident of Israel who receives dividends from which tax was withheld is generally exempt from the duty to file returns in Israel in respect of such income, provided such income was not derived from a business conducted in Israel by the taxpayer, and the taxpayer has no other taxable sources of income in Israel.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following is a general summary of the material U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of our Shares by U.S. Investors (as defined below) that hold such Shares as capital assets. This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, the regulations of the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued pursuant to the Code, or the Treasury Regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all as in effect on the date hereof and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect, or to different interpretation. This summary is for general information only and does not address all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to specific U.S. Investors in light of their particular circumstances or to U.S. Investors subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax law (such as banks, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, retirement plans, regulated investment companies, partnerships, dealers in securities, brokers, real estate investment trusts, certain former citizens or residents of the United States, persons who acquire Shares as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion transaction or other integrated investment, persons that have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar, persons that own (or are deemed to own, indirectly or by attribution) 10% or more of our shares or persons that generally mark their securities to market for U.S. federal income tax purposes). This summary does not address any U.S. state or local or non-U.S. tax considerations or any U.S. federal estate, gift or alternative minimum tax considerations.
As used in this summary, the term “U.S. Investor” means a beneficial owner of Shares that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (i) an individual citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof, or the District of Columbia, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source or (iv) a trust with respect to which a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions, or an electing trust that was in existence on August 19, 1996 and was treated as a domestic trust on that date.
If an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds Shares, the tax treatment of such partnership and each partner thereof will generally depend upon the status and activities of the partnership and such partner. A holder that is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to it and its partners of the purchase, ownership and disposition of Shares.
Prospective investors should be aware that this summary does not address the tax consequences to investors who are not U.S. Investors. Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors as to the particular tax considerations applicable to them relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of Shares, including the applicability of U.S. federal, state and local tax laws and non-U.S. tax laws
.
Taxation of U.S. Investors
The discussions under “— Distributions” and under “— Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Ordinary Shares” below assumes that we will not be treated as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, we have not determined whether we will be a PFIC in 2012, and it is possible that we will be a PFIC in 2012 or in any subsequent year. For a discussion of the rules that would apply if we are treated as a PFIC, see the discussion under “— Passive Foreign Investment Company.”
Distributions.
We have no current plans to pay dividends. To the extent we pay any dividends, a U.S. Investor will be required to include in gross income as a taxable dividend the amount of any distributions made on the Shares, including the amount of any Israeli taxes withheld, to the extent that those distributions are paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Any distributions in excess of our earnings and profits will be applied against and will reduce the U.S. Investor’s tax basis in its Shares and to the extent they exceed that tax basis, will be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of those Shares. If we were to pay dividends, we expect to pay such dividends in NIS; however, dividends paid to holders of our ADSs will be paid in U.S. Dollars. A dividend paid in NIS, including the amount of any Israeli taxes withheld, will be includible in a U.S. Investor’s income as a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date such dividend is received, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If the dividend is converted to U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Investor generally will not recognize a foreign currency gain or loss. However, if the U.S. Investor converts the NIS into U.S. dollars on a later date, the U.S. Investor must include, in computing its income, any gain or loss resulting from any exchange rate fluctuations. The gain or loss will be equal to the difference between (i) the U.S. dollar value of the amount included in income when the dividend was received and (ii) the amount received on the conversion of the NIS into U.S. dollars. Such gain or loss will generally be ordinary income or loss and United States source for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. U.S. Investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding the tax consequences to them if we pay dividends in NIS or any other non-U.S. currency.
Subject to certain significant conditions and limitations, including potential limitations under the United States-Israel income tax treaty, any Israeli taxes paid on or withheld from distributions from us and not refundable to a U.S. Investor may be credited against the investor’s U.S. federal income tax liability or, alternatively, may be deducted from the investor’s taxable income. This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid by a U.S. Investor or withheld from a U.S. Investor that year. Dividends paid on the Shares generally will constitute income from sources outside the United States and be categorized as “passive category income” or, in the case of some U.S. Investors, as “general category income” for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.
Since the rules governing foreign tax credits are complex, U.S. Investors should consult their own tax advisor regarding the availability of foreign tax credits in their particular circumstances. In addition, the U.S. Treasury Department has expressed concerns that parties to whom ADSs are pre-released may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits by U.S. holders of ADSs. Accordingly, the creditability of Israeli taxes could be affected by future actions that may be taken by the U.S. Treasury Department or parties to whom ADSs are pre-released.
Dividends paid on the Shares will not be eligible for the “dividends-received” deduction generally allowed to corporate U.S. Investors with respect to dividends received from U.S. corporations.
For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2013, distributions treated as dividends that are received by an individual U.S. Investor from “qualified foreign corporations” generally qualify for a 15% reduced maximum tax rate so long as certain holding period and other requirements are met. Dividends paid by us in a taxable year in which we are not a PFIC are expected to be eligible for the 15% reduced maximum tax rate. However, any dividend paid by us in a taxable year in which we are a PFIC will be subject to tax at regular ordinary income rates. As mentioned above, we have not determined whether we are currently a PFIC or not. Unless the reduced rate provision is extended or made permanent by subsequent legislation, for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, dividends will be taxed at regular ordinary income rates.
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Ordinary Shares.
Subject to the discussion under “— Passive Foreign Investment Company” below, a U.S. Investor generally will recognize capital gain or loss upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of Shares in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition and the U.S. Investor’s adjusted tax basis in such Shares. This capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Investor’s holding period in the Shares exceeds one year. Preferential tax rates for long-term capital gain (currently, with a maximum rate of 15% for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2013) will apply to individual U.S. Investors. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. The gain or loss will generally be income or loss from sources within the United States for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.
U.S. Investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving currency other than U.S. dollars upon the disposition of Shares.
Medicare Tax
. In addition, with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, certain U.S. persons, including individuals, estates and trusts, will be subject to an additional 3.8% Medicare tax on unearned income. For individuals, the additional Medicare tax applies to the lesser of (i) “net investment income” or (ii) the excess of “modified adjusted gross income” over $200,000 ($250,000 if married and filing jointly or $125,000 if married and filing separately). “Net investment income” generally equals the taxpayer’s gross investment income reduced by the deductions that are allocable to such income. Investment income generally includes passive income such as interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, rents, and capital gains. U.S. Investors are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the implications of the additional Medicare tax resulting from their ownership and disposition of Shares.
Passive Foreign Investment Company
In general, a corporation organized outside the United States will be treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes in any taxable year in which either (i) at least 75% of its gross income is “passive income” or (ii) on average at least 50% of its assets by value produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income. Passive income for this purpose generally includes, among other things, certain dividends, interest, royalties, rents and gains from commodities and securities transactions and from the sale or exchange of property that gives rise to passive income. Passive income also includes amounts derived by reason of the temporary investment of funds, including those raised in the public offering. In determining whether a non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC, a proportionate share of the income and assets of each corporation in which it owns, directly or indirectly, at least a 25% interest (by value) is taken into account.
Under the tests described above, whether or not we are a PFIC will be determined annually based upon the composition of our income and the composition and valuation of our assets, all of which are subject to change.
We believe that we were a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for years prior to 2009. We were not a PFIC in 2009, 2010, [and 2011] and we have not determined whether we will be a PFIC in 2012. Because the PFIC determination is highly fact intensive and made at the end of each taxable year, there can be no assurance that we will not be a PFIC in 2012 or in any subsequent year. Upon request, we will annually inform U.S. Investors if we and any of our subsidiaries were a PFIC with respect to the preceding year.
U.S. Investors should be aware of certain tax consequences of investing directly or indirectly in us if we are a PFIC. A U.S. Investor is subject to different rules depending on whether the U.S. Investor makes an election to treat us as a “qualified electing fund,” known as a QEF election, for the first taxable year that the U.S. Investor holds Shares, which is referred to in this disclosure as a “timely QEF election,” makes a “mark-to-market” election with respect to the Shares (if such election is available) or makes neither election.
QEF Election.
A U.S. Investor who makes a timely QEF election, referred to in this disclosure as an “Electing U.S. Investor,” with respect to us must report for U.S. federal income tax purposes his pro rata share of our ordinary earnings and net capital gain, if any, for our taxable year that ends with or within the taxable year of the Electing U.S. Investor. The “net capital gain” of a PFIC is the excess, if any, of the PFIC’s net long-term capital gains over its net short-term capital losses. The amount so included in income generally will be treated as ordinary income to the extent of such Electing U.S. Investor’s allocable share of the PFIC’s ordinary earnings and as long-term capital gain to the extent of such Electing U.S. Investor’s allocable share of the PFIC’s net capital gains. Such Electing U.S. Investor generally will be required to translate such income into U.S. dollars based on the average exchange rate for the PFIC’s taxable year with respect to the PFIC’s functional currency. Such income generally will be treated as income from sources outside the United States for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Amounts previously included in income by such Electing U.S. Investor under the QEF rules generally will not be subject to tax when they are distributed to such Electing U.S. Investor. The Electing U.S. Investor’s tax basis in Shares generally will increase by any amounts so included under the QEF rules and decrease by any amounts not included in income when distributed.
An Electing U.S. Investor will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such amounts for each taxable year in which we are a PFIC, regardless of whether such amounts are actually distributed to such Electing U.S. Investor. However, an Electing U.S. Investor may, subject to certain limitations, elect to defer payment of current U.S. federal income tax on such amounts, subject to an interest charge. If an Electing U.S. Investor is an individual, any such interest will be treated as non-deductible “personal interest.”
Any net operating losses or net capital losses of a PFIC will not pass through to the Electing U.S. Investor and will not offset any ordinary earnings or net capital gain of a PFIC recognized by Electing U.S. Investors in subsequent years (although such losses would ultimately reduce the gain, or increase the loss, recognized by the Electing U.S. Investor on its disposition of the Shares).
So long as an Electing U.S. Investor’s QEF election with respect to us is in effect with respect to the entire holding period for Shares, any gain or loss recognized by such Electing U.S. Investor on the sale, exchange or other disposition of such Shares generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if such Electing U.S. Investor has held such Shares for more than one year at the time of such sale, exchange or other disposition. Preferential tax rates for long-term capital gain (currently, with a maximum rate of 15% for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2011) will apply to individual U.S. Investors. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
A U.S. Investor makes a QEF election by completing the relevant portions of and filing IRS Form 8621 in accordance with the instructions thereto. Upon request, we will annually furnish U.S. Investors with information needed in order to complete IRS Form 8621 (which form would be required to be filed with the IRS on an annual basis by the U.S. Investor) and to make and maintain a valid QEF election for any year in which we or any of our subsidiaries are a PFIC. A QEF election will not apply to any taxable year during which we are not a PFIC, but will remain in effect with respect to any subsequent taxable year in which we become a PFIC. Each U.S. Investor is encouraged to consult its own tax advisor with respect to tax consequences of a QEF election with respect to us.
Mark-to-Market Election
. Alternatively, if our Shares are treated as “marketable stock,” a U.S. Investor would be allowed to make a “mark-to-market” election with respect to our Shares, provided the U.S. Investor completes and files IRS Form 8621 in accordance with the relevant instructions and related Treasury Regulations. If that election is made, the U.S. Investor generally would include as ordinary income in each taxable year the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the Shares at the end of the taxable year over such holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Shares. The U.S. Investor would also be permitted an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the U.S. Investor’s adjusted tax basis in the Shares over their fair market value at the end of the taxable year, but only to the extent of the net amount previously included in income as a result of the mark-to-market election. A U.S. Investor’s tax basis in the Shares would be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amount. Gain realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of the Shares would be treated as ordinary income, and any loss realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of the Shares would be treated as ordinary loss to the extent that such loss does not exceed the net mark-to-market gains previously included in income by the U.S. Investor, and any loss in excess of such amount will be treated as capital loss. Amounts treated as ordinary income will not be eligible for the favorable tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income or long-term capital gains.
Generally, stock will be considered marketable stock if it is “regularly traded” on a “qualified exchange” within the meaning of applicable Treasury regulations. A class of stock is regularly traded on an exchange during any calendar year during which such class of stock is traded, other than in
de minimis
quantities, on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter. Our ADSs will be marketable stock as long as they remain listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market and are regularly traded. A mark-to-market election will not apply to our ADSs held by a U.S. Investor for any taxable year during which we are not a PFIC, but will remain in effect with respect to any subsequent taxable year in which we become a PFIC. Such election will not apply to any PFIC subsidiary that we own. Each U.S. Investor is encouraged to consult its own tax advisor with respect to the availability and tax consequences of a mark-to-market election with respect to our ADSs.
Default PFIC Rules
. A U.S. Investor who does not make a timely QEF election or a mark-to-market election, referred to in this disclosure as a “Non-Electing U.S. Investor,” will be subject to special rules with respect to (a) any “excess distribution” (generally, the portion of any distributions received by the Non-Electing U.S. Investor on the Shares in a taxable year in excess of 125% of the average annual distributions received by the Non-Electing U.S. Investor in the three preceding taxable years, or, if shorter, the Non-Electing U.S. Investor’s holding period for his Shares), and (b) any gain realized on the sale or other disposition of such Shares. Under these rules:
|
|
•
|
the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over the Non-Electing U.S. Investor’s holding period for the Shares;
|
|
|
•
|
the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any year prior to us becoming a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income; and
|
|
|
•
|
the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years would be subject to tax at the highest rate of tax in effect for the applicable class of taxpayer for that year, and an interest charge for the deemed deferral benefit would be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such other taxable year.
|
If a Non-Electing U.S. Investor who is an individual dies while owning our Shares, the Non-Electing U.S. Investor’s successor would be ineligible to receive a step-up in tax basis of the Shares. Non-Electing U.S. Investors are encouraged to consult their tax advisors regarding the application of the PFIC rules to their specific situation.
A Non-Electing U.S. Investor who wishes to make a QEF election for a subsequent year may be able to make a special “purging election” pursuant to Section 1291(d) of the Code. Pursuant to this election, a Non-Electing U.S. Investor would be treated as selling his or her stock for fair market value on the first day of the taxable year for which the QEF election is made. Any gain on such deemed sale would be subject to tax under the rules for Non-Electing U.S. Investors as discussed above. Non-Electing U.S. Investors are encouraged to consult their tax advisors regarding the availability of a “purging election” as well as other available elections.
To the extent a distribution on our Shares does not constitute an excess distribution to a Non-Electing U.S. Investor, such Non-Electing U.S. Investor generally will be required to include the amount of such distribution in gross income as a dividend to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that are not allocated to excess distributions. The tax consequences of such distributions are discussed above under “— Taxation of U.S. Investors — Distributions.” Each U.S. Holder is encouraged to consult its own tax advisor with respect to the appropriate U.S. federal income tax treatment of any distribution on our Shares.
If we are treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during the holding period of a Non-Electing U.S. Investor, we will continue to be treated as a PFIC for all succeeding years during which the Non-Electing U.S. Investor is treated as a direct or indirect Non-Electing U.S. Investor even if we are not a PFIC for such years. A U.S. Investor is encouraged to consult its tax advisor with respect to any available elections that may be applicable in such a situation, including the “deemed sale” election of Code Section 1298(b)(1). In addition, U.S. Investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the IRS information reporting and filing obligations that may arise as a result of the ownership of shares in a PFIC.
We may invest in the equity of foreign corporations that are PFICs or may own subsidiaries that own PFICs. U.S. Investors will be subject to the PFIC rules with respect to their indirect ownership interests in such PFICs, such that a disposition of the shares of the PFIC or receipt by us of a distribution from the PFIC generally will be treated as a deemed disposition of such shares or the deemed receipt of such distribution by the U.S. Investor, subject to taxation under the PFIC rules. There can be no assurance that a U.S. Investor will be able to make a QEF election or a mark-to-market election with respect to PFICs in which we invest. Each U.S. Investor is encouraged to consult its own tax advisor with respect to tax consequences of an investment by us in a corporation that is a PFIC.
The U.S. federal income tax rules relating to PFICs are complex. U.S. Investors are urged to consult their own tax advisors with respect to the purchase, ownership and disposition of Shares, any elections available with respect to such Shares and the IRS information reporting obligations with respect to the purchase, ownership and disposition of Shares.
Certain Reporting Requirements
Certain U.S. Investors are required to file IRS Form 926, Return by U.S. Transferor of Property to a Foreign Corporation, and certain U.S. Investors may be required to file IRS Form 5471, Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations, reporting transfers of cash or other property to us and information relating to the U.S. Investor and us. Substantial penalties may be imposed upon a U.S. Investor that fails to comply. Each U.S. Investor should consult its own tax advisor regarding these requirements.
In addition, recently enacted legislation imposes new reporting requirements for the holder of certain foreign financial assets, including equity of foreign entities, if the aggregate value of all of these assets exceeds $50,000. The Shares are expected to be subject to these new reporting requirements unless the Shares are held in an account at a domestic financial institution. The requirement to file a report is effective for taxable years beginning after March 18, 2010. Penalties apply to any failure to file a required report. U.S. Investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of this legislation.
Backup Withholding Tax and Information Reporting Requirements
Generally, information reporting requirements will apply to distributions on our Shares or proceeds on the disposition of our Shares paid within the United States (and, in certain cases, outside the United States) to U.S. Investors other than certain exempt recipients, such as corporations. Furthermore, backup withholding (currently at 28%) may apply to such amounts if the U.S. Investor fails to (i) provide a correct taxpayer identification number, (ii) report interest and dividends required to be shown on its U.S. federal income tax return, or (iii) make other appropriate certifications in the required manner. U.S. Investors who are required to establish their exempt status generally must provide such certification on IRS Form W-9.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld as backup withholding from a payment may be credited against a U.S. Investor’s U.S. federal income tax liability and such U.S. Investor may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by filing the appropriate claim for refund with the IRS and furnishing any required information in a timely manner.
U.S. Investors should consult their own tax advisors concerning the tax consequences relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Shares.
PLAN
OF DISTRIBUTION
The selling shareholders and any of their pledgees, donees, transferees, assignees and successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their ADSs or warrants on any stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at fixed or negotiated prices. The selling shareholders may use any one or more of the following methods when selling ADSs or warrants:
|
|
·
|
ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits investors;
|
|
|
·
|
block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the securities as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;
|
|
|
·
|
purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;
|
|
|
·
|
an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
|
|
|
·
|
to cover short sales made after the date that this registration statement is declared effective by SEC;
|
|
|
·
|
broker-dealers may agree with the selling shareholders to sell a specified number of such securities at a stipulated price per security;
|
|
|
·
|
a combination of any such methods of sale; and
|
|
|
·
|
any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.
|
The selling shareholders may also sell shares under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, if available, rather than under this prospectus.
In connection with sales of the ADSs and warrants or otherwise, the selling shareholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers, which may in turn engage in short sales of the securities in the course of hedging in positions they assume. The selling shareholders may also sell their securities short and deliver the securities covered by a prospectus filed as part of a registration statement to close out short positions and to return borrowed securities in connection with such short sales. The selling shareholders may also loan or pledge their securities to broker-dealers that in turn may sell such securities.
Broker-dealers engaged by the selling shareholders may arrange for other broker-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the selling shareholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of securities, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated. The selling shareholders do not expect these commissions and discounts to exceed what is customary in the types of transactions involved.
The selling shareholders may from time to time pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the securities owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell ADSs or warrants from time to time under this prospectus, or under an amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act of 1933 amending the list of selling shareholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling shareholders under this prospectus.
Upon us being notified in writing by a selling shareholder that any material arrangement has been entered into with a broker-dealer for the sale of ADSs or warrants through a block trade, special offering, exchange distribution or secondary distribution or a purchase by a broker or dealer, a supplement to this prospectus will be filed, if required, pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act, disclosing (i) the name of each such selling shareholder and of the participating broker-dealer(s), (ii) the number of securities involved, (iii) the price at which such securities were sold, (iv)the commissions paid or discounts or concessions allowed to such broker-dealer(s), where applicable, (v) that such broker-dealer(s) did not conduct any investigation to verify the information set out or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, and (vi) other facts material to the transaction.
The selling shareholders also may transfer securities in other circumstances, in which case the transferees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus.
The selling shareholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. Discounts, concessions, commissions and similar selling expenses, if any, that can be attributed to the sale of securities will be paid by the selling shareholder and/or the purchasers. Each selling shareholder has represented and warranted to us that it acquired the securities subject to this registration statement in the ordinary course of such selling shareholder’s business and, at the time of its purchase of such securities such selling shareholder had no agreements or understandings, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute any such securities. We have advised each selling shareholder that it may not use securities registered on this registration statement to cover short sales of securities made prior to the date on which this registration statement shall have been declared effective by the SEC. If a selling shareholder uses this prospectus for any sale, it will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act. The selling shareholders will be responsible to comply with the applicable provisions of the Securities Act and Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder promulgated, including, without limitation, Regulation M, as applicable to such selling shareholders in connection with resales of their respective shares under the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
We will pay all fees and expenses incident to the registration of the shares, but we will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock.
INDEPENDENT
ACCOUNTANTS
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, included in this prospectus, have been so included in reliance on the report of Kesselman and Kesselman, Certified Public Accountant (Isr.), a member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the ordinary shares being offered by this prospectus and other legal matters concerning this offering relating to Israeli law will be passed upon for us by Yigal Arnon & Co., Jerusalem, Israel.
ENFORCEABILITY
OF CIVIL LIABILITIES
We are incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel. Service of process upon us and upon our directors and officers and the Israeli experts named in this registration statement, substantially all of whom reside outside of the United States, may be difficult to obtain within the United States. Furthermore, because substantially all of our assets and substantially all of our directors and officers are located outside the United States, any judgment obtained in the United States against us or any of our directors and officers may not be collectible within the United States.
We have been informed by our legal counsel in Israel, Yigal Arnon & Co., that it may be difficult to assert U.S. securities law claims in original actions instituted in Israel. Israeli courts may refuse to hear a claim based on a violation of U.S. securities laws because Israel is not the most appropriate forum to bring such a claim. In addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to hear a claim, it may determine that Israeli law and not U.S. law is applicable to the claim. If U.S. law is found to be applicable, the content of applicable U.S. law must be proved as a fact which can be a time-consuming and costly process. Certain matters of procedure will also be governed by Israeli law.
Subject to specified time limitations and legal procedures, Israeli courts may enforce a United States judgment in a civil matter which, subject to certain exceptions, is non-appealable, including judgments based upon the civil liability provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act and including a monetary or compensatory judgment in a non-civil matter, provided that among other things:
|
|
·
|
the judgments are obtained after due process before a court of competent jurisdiction, according to the laws of the state in which the judgment is given and the rules of private international law currently prevailing in Israel;
|
|
|
·
|
the prevailing law of the foreign state in which the judgments were rendered allows for the enforcement of judgments of Israeli courts;
|
|
|
·
|
adequate service of process has been effected and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to be heard and to present his or her evidence;
|
|
|
·
|
the judgments are not contrary to public policy of Israel, and the enforcement of the civil liabilities set forth in the judgment is not likely to impair the security or sovereignty of Israel;
|
|
|
·
|
the judgments were not obtained by fraud and do not conflict with any other valid judgments in the same matter between the same parties;
|
|
|
·
|
an action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any Israeli court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in the foreign court; and
|
|
|
·
|
the judgment is enforceable according to the laws of Israel and according to the law of the foreign state in which the relief was granted.
|
If a foreign judgment is enforced by an Israeli court, it generally will be payable in Israeli currency, which can then be converted into non-Israeli currency and transferred out of Israel. The usual practice in an action before an Israeli court to recover an amount in a non-Israeli currency is for the Israeli court to issue a judgment for the equivalent amount in Israeli currency at the rate of exchange in force on the date of the judgment, but the judgment debtor may make payment in foreign currency. Pending collection, the amount of the judgment of an Israeli court stated in Israeli currency ordinarily will be linked to the Israeli consumer price index plus interest at the annual statutory rate set by Israeli regulations prevailing at the time. Judgment creditors must bear the risk of unfavorable exchange rates.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form F-l under the Securities Act relating to this offering of our ordinary shares. This prospectus does not contain all of the information contained in the registration statement. The rules and regulations of the SEC allow us to omit certain information from this prospectus that is included in the registration statement. Statements made in this prospectus concerning the contents of any contract, agreement or other document are summaries of all material information about the documents summarized, but are not complete descriptions of all terms of these documents. If we filed any of these documents as an exhibit to the registration statement, you may read the document itself for a complete description of its terms.
In addition, we file reports with, and furnish information to, the SEC. You may read and copy the registration statement and any other documents we have filed at the SEC, including any exhibits and schedules, at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on this public reference room. As a foreign private issuer, all documents which were filed after September 24, 2010 on the SEC’s EDGAR system are available for retrieval on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. These SEC filings are also available to the public on the Israel Securities Authority’s Magna website at www.magna.isa.gov.il and from commercial document retrieval services. We also generally make available on our own web site (www.biolinerx.com) our quarterly and year-end financial statements as well as other information.
This prospectus is part of the registration statement and does not contain all of the information included in the registration statement. Whenever a reference is made in this prospectus to any of our contracts or other documents, the reference may not be complete and, for a copy of the contract or document, you should refer to the exhibits that are a part of the registration statement.
In addition, since our ordinary shares are traded on the TASE, in the past we filed Hebrew language periodic and immediate reports with, and furnished information to, the TASE and the Israel Securities Authority, or the ISA, as required under Chapter Six of the Israel Securities Law, 1968. On August 31, 2011, our shareholders approved a transition solely to U.S. reporting standards after listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market, in accordance with an applicable exemption under the Israel Securities Law. Copies of our SEC filings and submissions are now submitted to the Israeli Securities Authority and TASE. Such copies can be retrieved electronically through the MAGNA distribution site of the Israeli Securities Authority (www.magna.isa.gov.il) and the TASE website (maya.tase.co.il).
We maintain a corporate website at www.biolinerx.com. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this prospectus. We have included our website address in this prospectus solely as an inactive textual reference.
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Page
|
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2011
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
F-10
|
|
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
F-11
|
|
|
F-12
|
|
|
F-13
|
|
|
F-14
|
|
|
F-16
|
F - 1
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
(UNAUDITED)
|
Convenience translation into USD
(Note 1b)
|
||||||||||||
|
December 31,
|
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||
|
2010
|
2011
|
2011
|
||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
In thousands
|
|||||||||||
|
Assets
|
||||||||||||
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
111,746 | 33,895 | 9,131 | |||||||||
|
Short-term bank deposits
|
28,037 | 78,564 | 21,165 | |||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
46 | 317 | 85 | |||||||||
|
Other receivables
|
6,313 | 2,113 | 569 | |||||||||
|
Total current assets
|
146,142 | 114,889 | 30,950 | |||||||||
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
|
||||||||||||
|
Restricted deposits
|
2,414 | 3,401 | 916 | |||||||||
|
Long-term prepaid expenses
|
196 | 195 | 53 | |||||||||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
4,509 | 4,076 | 1,098 | |||||||||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
1,352 | 1,178 | 317 | |||||||||
|
Total non-current assets
|
8,471 | 8,850 | 2,384 | |||||||||
|
Total assets
|
154,613 | 123,739 | 33,334 | |||||||||
|
Liabilities and equity
|
||||||||||||
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
||||||||||||
|
Current maturities of long-term bank loan
|
307 | 307 | 83 | |||||||||
|
Accounts payable and accruals:
|
||||||||||||
|
Trade
|
3,849 | 5,551 | 1,495 | |||||||||
|
OCS
|
5,993 | 5,993 | 1,614 | |||||||||
|
Licensors
|
1,491 | - | - | |||||||||
|
Other
|
10,551 | 12,948 | 3,488 | |||||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
22,191 | 24,799 | 6,680 | |||||||||
|
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
||||||||||||
|
Long-term bank loan, net of current maturities
|
432 | 191 | 51 | |||||||||
|
Retirement benefit obligations
|
30 | 30 | 8 | |||||||||
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
462 | 221 | 59 | |||||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
22,653 | 25,020 | 6,739 | |||||||||
|
EQUITY
|
||||||||||||
|
Ordinary shares
|
1,236 | 1,236 | 333 | |||||||||
|
Warrants
|
6,549 | 6,549 | 1,764 | |||||||||
|
Share premium
|
414,435 | 414,780 | 111,740 | |||||||||
|
Capital reserve
|
27,623 | 30,023 | 8,088 | |||||||||
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(317,883 | ) | (353,869 | ) | (95,330 | ) | ||||||
|
Total equity
|
131,960 | 98,719 | 26,595 | |||||||||
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
154,613 | 123,739 | 33,334 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
BioLineRx
Ltd.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(UNAUDITED)
|
Convenience translation
into USD
(Note 1b)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Three months
|
Nine months
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Three months ended
September
30,
|
Nine months ended
September
30,
|
ended
September
30,
|
ended
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2011
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
In thousands
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NET SALES
|
113,160 | - | 113,160 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
COST OF SALES
|
(25,571 | ) | - | (25,571 | ) | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
|
GROSS PROFIT
|
87,589 | - | 87,589 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES, NET
|
(6,737 | ) | (13,255 | ) | (43,769 | ) | (30,044 | ) | (3,571 | ) | (8,094 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
SALES AND MARKETING EXPENSES
|
(1,322 | ) | (358 | ) | (3,506 | ) | (2,431 | ) | (96 | ) | (655 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
(2,690 | ) | (3,272 | ) | (8,914 | ) | (9,546 | ) | (881 | ) | (2,572 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
OPERATING PROFIT (LOSS)
|
76,840 | (16,885 | ) | 31,400 | (42,021 | ) | (4,548 | ) | (11,321 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
FINANCIAL INCOME
|
178 | 8,965 | 3,056 | 10,785 | 2,415 | 2,906 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
FINANCIAL EXPENSES
|
(3,869 | ) | (18 | ) | (4,931 | ) | (4,750 | ) | (5 | ) | (1,279 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) FOR THE PERIOD
|
73,149 | (7,938 | ) | 29,525 | (35,986 | ) | (2,138 | ) | (9,694 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
USD
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER ORDINARY SHARE - BASIC
|
0.59 | (0.06 | ) | 0.24 | (0.29 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.08 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
EARNINGS PER ORDINARY SHARE - DILUTED
|
0.59 | - | 0.24 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
BioLineRx
Ltd.
CONDENSED INTERIM STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
* Less than 1,000
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
BioLineRx
Ltd.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM CASH FLOW STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
Convenience translation
into USD
(Note 1b)
|
||||||||||||
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2011
|
2011
|
||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
In thousands
|
|||||||||||
|
CASH FLOWS - OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss) for the period
|
29,525 | (35,986 | ) | (9,694 | ) | |||||||
|
Adjustments required to reflect net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (see appendix below)
|
19,283 | 9,092 | 2,449 | |||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
48,808 | (26,894 | ) | (7,245 | ) | |||||||
|
CASH FLOWS - INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
|
Investment in short-term deposits
|
- | (76,351 | ) | (20,569 | ) | |||||||
|
Investment in restricted deposits
|
(206 | ) | (1,000 | ) | (269 | ) | ||||||
|
Maturities of short-term deposits
|
27,463 | 7,398 | ||||||||||
|
Maturities of restricted deposits
|
1,353 | |||||||||||
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
(1,310 | ) | (716 | ) | (193 | ) | ||||||
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
(95 | ) | (131 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(258 | ) | (50,735 | ) | (13,668 | ) | ||||||
|
CASH FLOWS - FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from bank loan
|
1,020 | - | - | |||||||||
|
Repayments of bank loan
|
(202 | ) | (230 | ) | (62 | ) | ||||||
|
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options
|
- | 1 | - | |||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
818 | (229 | ) | (62 | ) | |||||||
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
49,368 | (77,858 | ) | (20,975 | ) | |||||||
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS – BEGINNING
OF PERIOD
|
105,890 | 111,746 | 30,104 | |||||||||
|
EXCHANGE DIFFERENCES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
(2,925 | ) | 7 | 2 | ||||||||
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - END OF PERIOD
|
152,333 | 33,895 | 9,131 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
BioLineRx Ltd.
APPENDIX TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM CASH FLOW STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
Convenience translation
into USD
(Note 1b)
|
||||||||||||
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2011
|
2011
|
||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
In thousands
|
|||||||||||
|
Adjustments required to reflect net cash used in operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Income and expenses not involving cash flows:
|
||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
1,371 | 1,170 | 315 | |||||||||
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
1,550 | 80 | 22 | |||||||||
|
Long-term prepaid expenses
|
(24 | ) | 1 | * | ||||||||
|
Exchange differences on cash and cash equivalents
|
2,925 | (7 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
4,870 | 2,744 | 739 | |||||||||
|
Interest and exchange differences on short-term deposits
|
- | (1,639 | ) | (442 | ) | |||||||
|
Interest and linkage on bank loan
|
- | (11 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
|
Interest and exchange differences on restricted deposits
|
151 | 13 | 4 | |||||||||
| 10,843 | 2,351 | 633 | ||||||||||
|
Changes in operating asset and liability items:
|
||||||||||||
|
Decrease in trade accounts receivable and
other receivables
|
28,903 | 3,929 | 1,058 | |||||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accruals
|
(20,463 | ) | 2,812 | 758 | ||||||||
| 8,440 | 6,741 | 1,816 | ||||||||||
| 19,283 | 9,092 | 2,449 | ||||||||||
|
Supplementary information on interest received in cash
|
593 | 1,334 | 359 | |||||||||
* Less than 1,000
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
BioLineRx
Ltd.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 – GENERAL INFORMATION
|
a.
|
General
|
BioLineRx Ltd. (the “Company”) was incorporated and commenced operations in April 2003.
Since incorporation, the Company has been engaged, both independently and through its consolidated entities (collectively, the “Group”), in the development of therapeutics, from early-stage development to advanced clinical trials, for a wide range of medical needs.
In December 2004, the Company registered a limited partnership, BioLine Innovations Jerusalem L.P. (the “Partnership”), which commenced operations in January 2005. The Company holds a 99% interest in the Partnership, with the remaining 1% held by a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, BioLine Innovations Ltd. The Partnership was established to operate a biotechnology incubator located in Jerusalem under an agreement with the State of Israel.
In February 2007, the Company listed its securities on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) and they have been traded on the TASE since that time. Since July 2011, the Company’s American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) are also traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market.
In January 2008, the Company established a wholly owned subsidiary, BioLineRx USA Inc., which served as the Group’s business development arm in the United States. During 2011, the Company transferred its business development activities to Israel, and BioLineRx USA is no longer active.
The Company has been engaged in drug development since its incorporation. Although the Company has generated revenues from two out-licensing transactions, the Company cannot determine with reasonable certainty if and when the Company will have sustainable profits.
|
b.
|
Convenience translation into U.S. dollars (“dollars”, “USD” or “$”)
|
For the convenience of the reader, the reported New Israeli Shekel (“NIS”) amounts as of September 30, 2011 have been translated into dollars, at the representative rate of exchange on September 30, 2011 ($1 = NIS 3.712). The dollar amounts presented in these financial statements should not be construed as representing amounts that are receivable or payable in dollars or convertible into dollars, unless otherwise indicated.
|
c.
|
The condensed consolidated interim financial statements of the Company for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 were approved by the Board of Directors of the Company on November 24, 2011, and signed on its behalf by the Chairman of the Board, by the Company's CEO, and the Company's CFO.
|
BioLineRx Ltd.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 2 – BASIS OF PREPARATION
The Group’s condensed consolidated interim financial statements as of September 30, 2011 and for the three and nine months then ended (hereinafter – the interim financial statements) have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard No. 34, “Interim Financial Reporting” (hereinafter – IAS 34) and reflect all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the periods indicated therein. These interim financial statements, which are unaudited, do not include all disclosures necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The condensed consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and for the year then ended and their accompanying notes, which have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year or for any other interim period.
NOTE 3 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting policies applied in the preparation of the interim financial statements are consistent with those applied in the preparation of the annual financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and for the year then ended.
NOTE 4 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Group wrote off intangible assets in the aggregate amount of NIS 80,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, relating to a project (BL-4040) that was terminated.
NOTE 5 – RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research and development expenses are reflected net of research grants received from a related party, pursuant to a research funding arrangement for early development stage projects, as follows:
|
Three months ended
September 30,
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Grants received from related party, offset against research and development expenses
|
513 | 1,014 | 2,149 | 2,522 | ||||||||||||
BioLineRx Ltd.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 6 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On November 2, 2011, the Company’s shareholders rejected a proposal to extend the exercise period of the Company’s outstanding Series 2 warrants, which will expire, if unexercised, on December 28, 2011.
On November 24, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the re-pricing of approximately 3,700,000 outstanding “underwater” employee stock options (out of a total of approximately 6,200,000 stock options outstanding). The weighted average remaining vesting period of the options subject to re-pricing was 1.1 years, with a weighted average exercise price of NIS 4.07 per share. Terms of the re-pricing are as follows: (i) the exercise price of the options will be reduced to NIS 1.80 per share and (ii) one additional year of vesting will be added to the remaining vesting period of the options. The re-pricing is not applicable to options already vested, and it does not apply to options held by Directors or consultants. With respect to each eligible optionee, the re-pricing terms will only apply if the eligible optionee consents to the new terms. Without such consent, the terms will remain unchanged (in respect of that optionee). The total compensation cost associated with the re-pricing is approximately NIS 900,000, which will be recorded as an expense over the new vesting period of the re-priced options.
On February 23, 2012, the Company completed a private placement to healthcare-focused U.S. institutional investors and issued an aggregate of 5,244,301 American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”), at a purchase price of $2.86 per ADS, and warrants to purchase up to 2,622,157 additional ADSs at an exercise price of $3.57 per ADS. The offering raised a total of $15 million, with net proceeds of approximately $14.1 million, after deducting fees and expenses.
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders of
BioLineRx Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of BioLineRx Ltd. (the “Company”) and its consolidated entities as of December 31, 2009 and 2010 and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s Board of Directors and management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Company’s Board of Directors and management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company and its consolidated entities as of December 31, 2009 and 2010 and their results of operations and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).
|
Tel Aviv, Israel
|
Kesselman & Kesselman
|
|
|
March 27, 2011
|
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
|
|
|
Member of PricewaterhouseCoopers
|
||
|
International Ltd.
|
BioLineRx
Ltd.
|
Note
|
December 31,
|
Convenience
translation into
USD
(Note 1b)
|
||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2010
|
December 31,
2010
|
||||||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
In thousands
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
2i, 5a | 105,890 | 111,746 | 32,102 | ||||||||||||
|
Short-term bank deposits
|
5b | – | 28,037 | 8,054 | ||||||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
1,094 | 46 | 13 | |||||||||||||
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
2k, 15 | 37,750 | – | – | ||||||||||||
|
Other receivables
|
14a | 2,313 | 6,313 | 1,814 | ||||||||||||
|
Total current assets
|
147,047 | 146,142 | 41,983 | |||||||||||||
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Restricted deposits
|
2j, 12b(1) | 3,704 | 2,414 | 693 | ||||||||||||
|
Long-term prepaid expenses
|
14b | 1,150 | 196 | 56 | ||||||||||||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
6 | 4,175 | 4,509 | 1,295 | ||||||||||||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
7 | 3,042 | 1,352 | 388 | ||||||||||||
|
Asset in respect of retirement benefit obligations
|
2s | 49 | – | – | ||||||||||||
|
Total non-current assets
|
12,120 | 8,471 | 2,432 | |||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
159,167 | 154,613 | 44,415 | |||||||||||||
|
Liabilities and equity
|
||||||||||||||||
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
3a | |||||||||||||||
|
Current maturities of long-term bank loan
|
8 | – | 307 | 88 | ||||||||||||
|
Accounts payable and accruals:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Trade
|
14c(1) | 6,452 | 3,849 | 1,106 | ||||||||||||
|
OCS
|
14,005 | 5,993 | 1,722 | |||||||||||||
|
Licensors
|
10,570 | 1,491 | 428 | |||||||||||||
|
Other
|
14c(2) | 10,203 | 10,551 | 3,031 | ||||||||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
41,230 | 22,191 | 6,375 | |||||||||||||
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Long term bank loan, net of current maturities
|
8 | 432 | 124 | |||||||||||||
|
Retirement benefit obligations
|
2s(1) | – | 30 | 8 | ||||||||||||
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
– | 462 | 132 | |||||||||||||
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
|
12 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
41,230 | 22,653 | 6,507 | |||||||||||||
|
EQUITY
|
9 | |||||||||||||||
|
Ordinary shares
|
1,235 | 1,236 | 355 | |||||||||||||
|
Share premium
|
412,513 | 414,435 | 119,056 | |||||||||||||
|
Warrants
|
6,549 | 6,549 | 1,881 | |||||||||||||
|
Capital reserve
|
22,963 | 27,623 | 7,935 | |||||||||||||
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(325,323 | ) | (317,883 | ) | (91,319 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Total equity
|
117,937 | 131,960 | 37,908 | |||||||||||||
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
159,167 | 154,613 | 44,415 | |||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
BioLineRx
Ltd.
|
Note
|
Year ended December 31,
|
Convenience translation into USD
(Note 1b)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
In thousands
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
REVENUES
|
15, 16 | – | 63,909 | 113,160 | 32,508 | |||||||||||||||
|
COST OF REVENUES
|
14d | – | (22,622 | ) | (25,571 | ) | (7,346 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
GROSS PROFIT
|
– | 41,287 | 87,589 | 25,162 | ||||||||||||||||
|
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES, NET
|
14e | (106,156 | ) | (90,302 | ) | (54,966 | ) | (15,790 | ) | |||||||||||
|
SALES AND MARKETING EXPENSES
|
14f | – | (3,085 | ) | (4,609 | ) | (1,324 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES
|
14g | (13,083 | ) | (11,182 | ) | (14,875 | ) | (4,273 | ) | |||||||||||
|
GAIN ON ADJUSTMENT OF WARRANTS TO FAIR VALUE
|
2l | 3,658 | – | – | – | |||||||||||||||
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
|
(115,581 | ) | (63,282 | ) | 13,139 | 3,775 | ||||||||||||||
|
FINANCIAL INCOME
|
14h | 13,001 | 3,928 | 3,056 | 877 | |||||||||||||||
|
FINANCIAL EXPENSES
|
14i | (12,269 | ) | (2,164 | ) | (8,755 | ) | (2,515 | ) | |||||||||||
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) FOR THE YEAR
|
(114,849 | ) | (61,518 | ) | 7,440 | 2,137 | ||||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
USD
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER ORDINARY SHARE – BASIC
|
11 | (1.44 | ) | (0.63 | ) | 0.06 | 0.02 | |||||||||||||
|
EARNINGS PER ORDINARY SHARE – DILUTED
|
11 | – | – | 0.06 | 0.02 | |||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
BioLineRx
Ltd.
* Represents an amount less than NIS 1,000.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
BioLineRx
Ltd.
|
Year ended December 31,
|
Convenience translation into USD
(Note 1b)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
In thousands
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CASH FLOWS – OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss) for the year
|
(114,849 | ) | (61,518 | ) | 7,440 | 2,137 | ||||||||||
|
Adjustments required to reflect net cash used in operating activities (see appendix below)
|
21,080 | (22,978 | ) | 33,231 | 9,546 | |||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
(93,769 | ) | (84,496 | ) | 40,671 | 11,683 | ||||||||||
|
CASH FLOWS – INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from sale of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
|
27,851 | 30,837 | – | – | ||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from sale of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss – restricted
|
– | 3,767 | – | – | ||||||||||||
|
Purchase of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
|
(58,327 | ) | – | – | – | |||||||||||
|
Purchase of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss – restricted
|
(3,757 | ) | – | – | – | |||||||||||
|
Investment in short-term deposits
|
– | – | (28,333 | ) | (8,139 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Investment in restricted deposits
|
– | (3,147 | ) | (206 | ) | (59 | ) | |||||||||
|
Withdrawal of restricted deposits
|
5,977 | 251 | 1,353 | 389 | ||||||||||||
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
(3,255 | ) | (235 | ) | (1,853 | ) | (532 | ) | ||||||||
|
Grants received in respect of property and equipment
|
28 | – | – | – | ||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
– | 3 | – | – | ||||||||||||
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
(1,790 | ) | (628 | ) | (492 | ) | (141 | ) | ||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(33,273 | ) | 30,848 | (29,531 | ) | (8,482 | ) | |||||||||
|
CASH FLOWS – FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Issuance of share capital and warrants, net of issuance expenses
|
– | 97,551 | – | – | ||||||||||||
|
Proceeds of bank loan
|
1,020 | 293 | ||||||||||||||
|
Repayments of bank loan
|
– | – | (281 | ) | – | |||||||||||
|
Proceeds from exercise of warrants
|
– | 3 | – | – | ||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options
|
– | 116 | 26 | 7 | ||||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
– | 97,670 | 765 | 219 | ||||||||||||
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
(127,042 | ) | 44,022 | 11,905 | 3,420 | |||||||||||
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS – BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
193,798 | 60,379 | 105,890 | 30,420 | ||||||||||||
|
EXCHANGE DIFFERENCES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
(6,377 | ) | 1,489 | (6,049 | ) | (1,738 | ) | |||||||||
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS – END OF YEAR
|
60,379 | 105,890 | 111,746 | 32,102 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
BioLineRx Ltd.
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENTS
|
Year ended December 31,
|
Convenience translation into USD
(Note 1b)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
In thousands
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APPENDIX
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Adjustments required to reflect net cash used in operating activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Income and expenses not involving cash flows:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
1,676 | 1,754 | 1,814 | 521 | ||||||||||||
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
603 | 584 | 1,846 | 530 | ||||||||||||
|
Retirement benefit obligations
|
– | (63 | ) | 79 | 23 | |||||||||||
|
Long-term prepaid expenses
|
(103 | ) | (880 | ) | 954 | 274 | ||||||||||
|
Gain on adjusting warrants to fair value
|
(3,658 | ) | – | – | – | |||||||||||
|
Loss on sale of property and equipment
|
– | 1 | – | – | ||||||||||||
|
Exchange differences on cash and cash equivalents
|
6,377 | (1,489 | ) | 6,049 | 1,738 | |||||||||||
|
Gain on fair value adjustments to financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
|
(273 | ) | (98 | ) | – | – | ||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
9,035 | 3,399 | 6,557 | 1,884 | ||||||||||||
|
Interest and exchange differences on short-term deposits
|
296 | 85 | ||||||||||||||
|
Interest and exchange differences on restricted deposits
|
156 | (204 | ) | 143 | 41 | |||||||||||
| 13,813 | 3,004 | 17,738 | 5,096 | |||||||||||||
|
Changes in operating asset and liability items:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Decrease (increase) in trade accounts receivable and other receivables
|
(9,812 | ) | (29,877 | ) | 34,798 | 9,996 | ||||||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accruals
|
17,079 | 3,895 | (19,305 | ) | (5,546 | ) | ||||||||||
| 7,267 | (25,982 | ) | 15,493 | 4,450 | ||||||||||||
| 21,080 | (22,978 | ) | 33,231 | 9,546 | ||||||||||||
|
Supplementary information on investing and financing activities not involving cash flows:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Credit received in connection with purchase of property and equipment
|
104 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
|
Credit received in connection with purchase of intangible assets
|
238 | 245 | 100 | 29 | ||||||||||||
|
Warrants reclassified from liabilities to equity
|
947 | – | – | – | ||||||||||||
|
Supplementary information on interest received in cash
|
3,901 | 443 | 1,013 | 291 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
BioLineRx
Ltd.
NOTE 1 – GENERAL INFORMATION
|
|
a.
|
General
|
BioLineRx Ltd. (the “Company”) was incorporated and commenced operations in April 2003. The Company’s headquarters are in Jerusalem, Israel.
Since incorporation, the Company has been engaged, both independently and through its consolidated entities (collectively, the “Group”), in the development of therapeutics, from early-stage development to advanced clinical trials, for a wide range of medical needs.
In December 2004, the Company formed a limited partnership, BioLine Innovations Jerusalem L.P. (the “Partnership”), which commenced operations on January 1, 2005. The Company holds a 99% interest in the Partnership, with the remaining 1% held by a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, BioLine Innovations Ltd. (the “Subsidiary”). The Partnership was established to operate an industrial research and development center in an incubator located in Jerusalem (the “Incubator”) under an agreement with the State of Israel. See Note 12a(1).
In February 2007, the Company listed its securities on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (“TASE”) — see Note 9.
In January 2008, the Company established a wholly-owned subsidiary, BioLineRx USA Inc., which serves as the Group’s business development arm in the United States. In January 2011, the Company announced its intention to transfer its business development activities to Israel.
As noted above, the Company has been engaged in the development of therapeutics since its incorporation. As of the date of these financial statements, the Company has succeeded in out-licensing two of its products. Nevertheless, the Company cannot determine with reasonable certainty if and when it will become profitable on a current basis.
|
|
b.
|
Convenience translation into US dollars (“dollars” or “USD”)
|
For the convenience of the reader, the reported New Israeli Shekel (NIS) amounts as of December 31, 2010 have been translated into dollars, at the representative rate of exchange on March 31, 2011 (USD 1 = NIS 3.481). The dollar amounts presented in these financial statements should not be construed as representing amounts that are receivable or payable in dollars or convertible into dollars, unless otherwise indicated.
|
|
c.
|
Approval of consolidated financial statements
|
The consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 were approved by the Board of Directors of the Company on March 27, 2011, and signed on its behalf by the Chairman of the Board, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial and Operating Officer.
NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
|
a.
|
Basis of presentation
|
The Company’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). The significant accounting policies described below have been applied on a consistent basis for all years presented, unless noted otherwise.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of historical cost, subject to adjustment of financial assets and liabilities to their fair value through profit or loss and adjustment of assets and liabilities in connection with retirement benefit obligations.
NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)
The Company classifies its expenses on the statement of comprehensive income (loss) based on the operating characteristics of such expenses. The Company’s annual operating cycle consists of a standard 12-month period.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. Areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements are disclosed in Note 4. Actual results may differ materially from estimates and assumptions used by the Group’s management.
|
|
b.
|
Consolidation of the financial statements
|
Consolidated entities (the Partnership and the Subsidiaries) include all entities over which the Company has the power to govern the financial and operating policies, which generally involves holding more than 50% of the shares or interests conferring voting rights of the applicable entity. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the Company controls an entity. Consolidated entities are fully consolidated from the date on which control of such entities is transferred to the Company and they are de-consolidated from the date that control ceases. The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries by the Group.
|
|
c.
|
Functional and presentation currency
|
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which each entity operates (the “functional currency”). The consolidated financial statements are presented in NIS, which is the Group’s functional and presentation currency.
Transactions that are executed in currencies other than the Group’s functional currency (“foreign currency transactions”) are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of each transaction. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in profit or loss.
|
|
d.
|
Property and equipment
|
Property and equipment are stated at historical cost less depreciation and related grants received from the Office of the Chief Scientist of the Israeli Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor (the “OCS”). Historical cost includes expenditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the items. Assets are depreciated by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, provided that the Group’s management believes the residual values of the assets to be negligible, as follows:
|
%
|
||||
|
Computers and communications equipment
|
20 – 33 | |||
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
6 – 15 | |||
|
Laboratory equipment
|
15 – 20 | |||
The assets’ residual values, methods of depreciation and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted, if appropriate, at each balance sheet date. An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount.
Leasehold improvements are amortized by the straight-line method over the term of the lease, which is shorter than the estimated useful life of the improvements.
Grants received from the OCS are recognized in profit or loss over the life of a depreciable asset as a reduction in depreciation expense.
NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)
|
|
e.
|
Intangible assets
|
The Group applies the cost method of accounting in subsequent measurements of intangible assets. Under this method of accounting, intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment losses.
Intellectual property
The Group recognizes in its financial statements intangible assets developed by the Group to the extent that the conditions stipulated in q. below are met. Intellectual property acquired by the Group is initially measured at cost. Intellectual property acquired by the Group is not amortized and is tested annually for impairment. See f. below.
Computer software
Acquired computer software licenses are capitalized on the basis of the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use the specific software. These costs are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the software programs (3 – 5 years).
|
|
f.
|
Impairment of non-financial assets
|
Intangible assets are tested annually for impairment, except for computer software that is amortized, as detailed in 2e above. In addition, impairment testing of intellectual property is required when the Group decides to terminate or suspend the development of a project based on such intellectual property. Property and equipment, as well as computer software, are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized equal to the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and the asset’s value in use to the Group.
|
|
g.
|
Government grants
|
Government grants are recognized at fair value, whenever it is probable that the grant will be received and that the Group will comply with all the conditions in respect thereof.
Government grants related to periodic costs are deferred and recognized in profit or loss over the period required to match the related costs.
Government grants related to fixed assets are recorded as a reduction in the book value of the related assets, and are charged to profit and loss in accordance with the straight-line method.
|
|
h.
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
1)
|
Classification
|
The Group classifies its financial assets in the following categories: at fair value through profit or loss and loans and receivables. The classification depends on the purpose for which each financial asset was acquired. The Group’s management determines the classification of financial assets at initial recognition:
|
|
a)
|
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
|
A financial asset is classified in this category if management has designated it as a financial asset upon initial recognition, because it is managed and its performance is evaluated on a fair-value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy. The Group’s investment policy with regard to its excess cash, as adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors, is composed of the following objectives: (i) preserving investment principal, (ii) providing liquidity and (iii) providing optimum yields pursuant to the policy guidelines and market conditions. The policy provides detailed guidelines as to the securities and other financial instruments in which the Group is allowed to invest. In addition, in order to maintain liquidity, investments are structured to provide flexibility to liquidate at least 50% of all investments within 15 business days. Information about these assets, including details of the portfolio and income earned, is provided internally on a quarterly basis to the Group’s key management personnel. Any divergence from this investment policy requires approval from the Company’s Board of Directors.
NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)
|
|
b)
|
Loans and receivables
|
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. These assets are included in current assets, except for installments which are due more than 12 months subsequent to the balance sheet date. Such installments are included in non-current assets. The Group’s loans and receivables include “accounts receivable,” “cash and cash equivalents,” “short-term investments,” “restricted deposits” and “bank loans” in the balance sheet. See Notes 2i, 2j and 2k.
|
|
2)
|
Recognition and measurement
|
Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade-date — the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Investments are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs for all financial assets not carried at fair value through profit or loss. Financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognized at fair value, and transaction costs are expensed in the income statement. Financial assets are de-recognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value. Loans and receivables are subsequently carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of the “financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” category are presented in the income statement within “other (losses)/gains — net” in the period in which they arise. Dividend income from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss is recognized in the income statement as part of other income when the Group’s right to receive payments is established.
|
|
3)
|
Offsetting financial instruments
|
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount reported in the balance sheet when there is a legally enforceable right to offset the recognized amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis or realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
|
|
i.
|
Cash equivalents
|
In the consolidated statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand and short-term bank deposits (up to three months from date of deposit) that are not restricted as to withdrawal or use, and are therefore considered to be cash equivalents.
|
|
j.
|
Restricted deposits
|
The Company has placed a lien on NIS and dollar deposits in banks to secure its liabilities to various parties. Those deposits are presented separately as non-current assets, in accordance with the timing of the restriction. See Note 12b(1).
|
|
k.
|
Trade receivables
|
Trade receivable balances relate to amounts receivable from customers of the Group in respect of sub-licenses granted, or services that have been provided, in the ordinary course of business. If collection of these amounts is expected within one year or less, they are classified in current assets; otherwise, they are reflected in non-current assets.
Trade receivables are initially recognized at their fair value. Thereafter, they are measured at amortized cost, based on the effective interest method, less any allowance for doubtful accounts.
NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)
|
|
l.
|
Warrants
|
Receipts in respect of warrants are classified as equity to the extent that they confer the right to purchase a fixed number of shares for a fixed exercise price. As part of the Company’s initial public offering on the TASE in February 2007, the Company issued Series 1 warrants with an exercise price linked to the Israeli Consumer Price Index (“CPI”). Accordingly, the exercise price was not deemed to be fixed and, as such, the Series 1 warrants did not qualify for equity classification. As long as the exercise price was linked to the CPI, the Series 1 warrants were classified as liabilities and carried at fair value, with changes in their fair value recognized in profit or loss. The issuance costs of the Series 1 warrants were also directly charged to profit or loss. Following the amendment in 2008 of the terms of the Series 1 warrants, pursuant to which the linkage of the exercise price to the CPI was cancelled, the warrants were classified in equity.
|
|
m.
|
Share capital
|
The Company’s Ordinary Shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issuance of new shares or warrants are reflected in equity as a deduction from the issuance proceeds.
|
|
n.
|
Trade payables
|
Trade payables are obligations to pay for goods or services that have been acquired in the ordinary course of business from suppliers. Accounts payable are classified as current liabilities if payment is due within one year or less (or in the normal operating cycle of the business if longer). If not, they are presented as non-current liabilities. Trade payables are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
|
|
o.
|
Deferred taxes
|
Deferred taxes are recognized using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred income tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable income will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized.
As the Group is currently engaged primarily in development activities and is not expected to generate taxable income in the foreseeable future, no deferred tax assets are included in the financial statements.
|
|
p.
|
Revenue recognition
|
The Group recognizes revenue in accordance with International Accounting Standard (“IAS”) 18 — “Revenue,” including guidance regarding arrangements with multiple deliverables. Pursuant to this guidance, the Group applies revenue recognition criteria to the separately identifiable components of a single transaction. The consideration from the arrangement is allocated among the separately identifiable components by reference to their fair value.
Revenues incurred in connection with the out-licensing of the Group’s patents and other intellectual property are recognized when all of the following criteria have been met as of the balance sheet date:
|
|
•
|
The Group has transferred to the buyer the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the patents and intellectual property.
|
|
|
•
|
The Group does not retain either the continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually associated with ownership or the effective control over the patent and intellectual property.
|
|
|
•
|
The amount of revenue can be measured reliably.
|
|
|
•
|
It is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the Group.
|
|
|
•
|
The costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the sale can be measured reliably.
|
NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)
Revenues in connection with rendering of services are recognized by reference to the stage of completion of the transaction as of the balance sheet date, if and when the outcome of the transaction can be estimated reliably.
Revenues from royalties are recognized on an accrual basis in accordance with the substance of the relevant agreement.
|
|
q.
|
Research and development expenses
|
Research expenses are charged to operations as incurred.
An intangible asset arising from development (or from the development phase of an internal project) is recognized if all of the following conditions are fulfilled:
|
|
•
|
technical feasibility exists for completing development of the intangible asset so that it will be available for use or sale.
|
|
|
•
|
it is management’s intention to complete development of the intangible asset for use or sale.
|
|
|
•
|
the Company has the ability to use or sell the intangible asset.
|
|
|
•
|
it is probable that the intangible asset will generate future economic benefits, including existence of a market for the output of the intangible asset or the intangible asset itself or, if the intangible asset is to be used internally, the usefulness of the intangible asset.
|
|
|
•
|
adequate technical, financial and other resources are available to complete development of the intangible asset, as well as the use or sale thereof.
|
|
|
•
|
the Company has the ability to reliably measure the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development.
|
Other development costs that do not meet the foregoing conditions are charged to operations as incurred. Development costs previously expensed are not recognized as an asset in subsequent periods. As of December 31, 2010, the Group has not yet capitalized development expenses.
|
|
r.
|
Government participation in research and development expenses
|
The Group receives participation in research and development expenses from the State of Israel through the OCS, both in the form of loans extended to the Incubator for research and development, as described in Note 12a(1), and in the form of grants, as described in Note 12a(2).
Despite the formal difference between the two types of support from the OCS, there is no material financial difference between them. Each loan and grant qualifies as a “forgivable loan” in accordance with IAS 20, “Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance,” since the loans and grants are repayable only if the Group generates revenues related to the project that is the subject of the loan or grant.
The Company recognizes each forgivable loan on a systematic basis at the same time the Company records, as an expense, the related development costs for which the grant/loan is received, provided that there is reasonable assurance that (a) the Company complies with the conditions attached to the grant/loan and (b) the grant/loan will be received. The amount of the forgivable loan is recognized based on the participation rate approved by the OCS.
The Company accounts for each forgivable loan as a liability unless it is more likely than not that the Company will meet the terms of forgiveness, in which case the forgivable loan is accounted for as a government grant and carried to income as a reduction of research and development expenses.
Government grants received in respect of investments in property and equipment are presented as a reduction of the cost of such assets.
NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)
If forgivable loans are initially carried to income, as described above, and, in subsequent periods, it appears more likely than not that the project will be successful and that the loans will be repaid or royalties paid to the OCS, the Group recognizes a liability on the balance sheet.
|
|
s.
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
1)
|
Pension and severance pay obligations
|
Israeli labor laws and the Group’s agreements require the Group to pay retirement benefits to employees terminated or leaving their employ in certain other circumstances. Most of the Group’s employees are covered by a defined contribution plan under Section 14 of the Israel Severance Pay Law.
The amount recorded as an employee benefit expense in respect of defined contribution plans for the years 2008, 2009 and 2010 was NIS 1,884,000, NIS 1,887,000, and NIS 1,982,000, respectively.
With respect to the remaining employees, the Group records a liability on its balance sheet for defined benefit plans that represents the present value of the defined benefit obligation as of balance sheet date, net of the fair value of plan assets, and adjustments for unrecognized actuarial gains or losses. The defined benefit obligation is computed annually by independent actuaries, using the corridor method. The present value of the defined benefit liability is determined by discounting the anticipated future cash outflows, using interest rates that are denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be payable.
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged to income.
Past-service costs are recognized immediately in income, unless the changes to the pension plan are conditional on the employees remaining in service for a specified period of time (the vesting period). In such cases, the past-service costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
|
|
2)
|
Vacation days and recreation pay
|
Labor laws in Israel provide that every employee is entitled to vacation days and recreation pay, both of which are computed annually. The entitlement with respect to each employee is based on the employee’s length of service with the Company. The Group recognizes a liability and an expense in respect of vacation and recreation pay based on the individual entitlement of each employee.
|
|
3)
|
Share-based payments
|
The Group operates an equity-settled, share-based compensation plan, under which it receives services from employees as consideration for equity instruments (options) of the Group. The fair value of the employee services received in exchange for the grant of the options is recognized as an expense. The total amount to be expensed is determined by reference to the fair value of the options granted:
|
|
•
|
including any market performance conditions (for example, the Company’s share price);
|
|
|
•
|
excluding the impact of any service and non-market performance vesting conditions (for example, profitability, sales growth targets and the employee remaining with the entity over a specified time period); and
|
|
|
•
|
excluding the impact of any non-vesting conditions.
|
Non-market vesting conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that are expected to vest. The total expense is recognized over the vesting period, which is the period over which all of the specified vesting conditions are to be satisfied. At the end of each reporting period, the Group revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to vest based on the non-marketing vesting conditions. It recognizes the impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, in the income statement, with a corresponding adjustment to equity.
NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)
When the options are exercised, the Company issues new shares. The proceeds received, net of any directly attributable transaction costs, are credited to share capital (at par value) and share premium when the options are exercised.
|
|
t.
|
Earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
1)
|
Basic
|
The basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the earnings (loss) attributable to the holders of Ordinary Shares by the weighted average number of outstanding Ordinary Shares during the year.
|
|
2)
|
Diluted
|
The diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of outstanding Ordinary Shares, assuming conversion of all dilutive potential shares. The Company’s dilutive potential shares consist of warrants and options granted to employees and service providers. The dilutive potential shares were not taken into account in computing loss per share in 2008 and 2009, as their effect would not have been dilutive.
|
|
u.
|
Changes in accounting policy and disclosures
|
|
|
1)
|
New and amended standards adopted during 2010
|
The Group has adopted the following new and amended accounting standards as of January 1, 2010, which did not have a material effect on the financial statements of the Group:
|
|
a)
|
IAS 27 (revised) requires the effects of all transactions with non-controlling interests to be recorded in equity if there is no change in control and these transactions will no longer result in goodwill or gains and losses. The standard also specifies the accounting when control is lost. Any remaining interest in the entity is re-measured to fair value, and a gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss. The Group did not carry out any transactions with non-controlling interests during 2010 and, accordingly, the initial adoption of IAS 27 (revised) did not have any impact on the Group’s financial statements.
|
|
|
b)
|
IFRS 3 (revised), “Business Combinations” is effective prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after 1 July 2009. The revised standard continues to apply the acquisition method to business combinations but with some significant changes compared with IFRS 3. For example, all payments to purchase a business are recorded at fair value at the acquisition date, with contingent payments classified as debt subsequently remeasured through the statement of comprehensive income. There is a choice on an acquisition-by-acquisition basis to measure the non-controlling interest in the acquiree either at fair value or at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the acquiree’s net assets. All acquisition-related costs are expensed. The Group elected to adopt IFRS 3 (revised) on a prospective basis for all business combinations, effective January 1, 2010. The initial adoption of IFRS 3 (revised) did not have an effect on the Group’s financial statements.
|
|
|
c)
|
IAS 1 (amendment), “Presentation of Financial Statements,” clarifies that the potential settlement of a liability by the issue of equity is not relevant to its classification as current or non-current. By amending the definition of current liability, the amendment permits a liability to be classified as non-current (provided that the entity has an unconditional right to defer settlement by transfer of cash or other assets for at least 12 months after the accounting period) notwithstanding the fact that the entity could be required by the counterparty to settle in shares at any time. The Group adopted IAS 1 (amendment) effective January 1, 2010. The initial adoption of IAS 1 (amendment) did not have an effect on the Group’s financial statements.
|
NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)
|
|
d)
|
IFRS 7 “Financial Instruments — Disclosures” (amendment), requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurement and liquidity risk. In particular, the amendment requires disclosure of fair value measurements in accordance with a fair value measurement hierarchy. The amendment did not have a material impact on the Group’s financial statements for the periods reported herein.
|
|
|
e)
|
IAS 38 (amendment), “Intangible Assets,” is part of the IASB’s annual improvements project published in May 2008. The amendment provides that a prepayment may only be recognized in the event that payment has been made in advance of obtaining the right of access to goods or receipt of services.
|
The amendment also establishes that when re-measuring the book value of a debt instrument at termination of fair value hedge accounting, the effective interest calculated as of the date hedge accounting terminates should be used. The amendment did not have a material impact on the Group’s financial statements for the periods reported herein.
|
|
2)
|
Standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards that are not yet effective and have not been early adopted by the Group, and which are not expected to have a material impact on the Group’s financial statements
|
IAS 32 (amendment), “Classification of Rights Issues,” was issued in October 2009. For rights issues offered for a fixed amount of foreign currency, current practice appears to require such issues to be accounted for as derivative liabilities. The amendment states that if such rights are issued pro rata to all existing shareholders of an entity in the same class for a fixed amount of currency, they should be classified as equity regardless of the currency in which the exercise price is denominated. The amendment will be effective for annual periods beginning on or after February 1, 2010, with early application permissible. The Group intends to apply this amendment in its financial statements beginning on January 1, 2011.
NOTE 3 – FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
According to estimates by the Group’s management, the Group’s exposure to credit risks as of December 31, 2010 is immaterial (see Note 3b). The activities of the Group expose the Group to market risks, particularly as a result of currency risks.
The Company’s finance department is responsible for carrying out risk management activities in accordance with policies approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. In this regard, the finance department identifies, defines and assesses financial risks in close cooperation with other Company departments. The Board of Directors provides written guidelines for overall risk management, as well as written policies dealing with specific areas, such as exchange rate risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, use of financial instruments, and investment of excess cash.
|
|
a.
|
Market risks
|
|
|
1)
|
Concentration of currency risks
|
The Group’s activities are partly denominated in foreign currency, which exposes the Group to risks resulting from changes in exchange rates (primarily the dollar).
NOTE 3 – FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT – (continued)
The effect of fluctuations in various exchange rates on the Group’s income and equity is as follows:
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Income (loss)
|
Income (loss)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Sensitive instrument
|
10%
increase
|
5%
increase
|
Value on
balance sheet
|
5%
decrease
|
10% decrease
|
|||||||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dollar-linked balances:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
7,339 | 3,670 | 73,394 | (3,670 | ) | (7,339 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Short-term bank deposits
|
2,804 | 1,402 | 28,037 | (1,402 | ) | (2,804 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Restricted deposits*
|
57 | 28 | 569 | (28 | ) | (57 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Other receivables
|
529 | 265 | 5,294 | (265 | ) | (529 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Trade payables
|
(179 | ) | (90 | ) | (1,792 | ) | 90 | 179 | ||||||||||||
|
Payable to licensors
|
(149 | ) | (75 | ) | (1,491 | ) | 75 | 149 | ||||||||||||
|
Total dollar-linked balances
|
10,401 | 5,200 | 104,011 | (5,200 | ) | (10,401 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Euro-linked trade payables
|
(41 | ) | (20 | ) | (406 | ) | 20 | 41 | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
10,360 | 5,180 | 103,605 | (5,180 | ) | (10,360 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
*
|
See also Note 12b(1).
|
The Group also maintains cash and cash equivalent balances that are linked to other currencies in amounts that are not material.
The Company believes that the likelihood of a fluctuation in exchange rates of up to 10% in the coming period is reasonable.
|
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Income (loss)
|
Income (loss)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Sensitive instrument
|
10%
increase
|
5%
increase
|
Value on
balance sheet
|
5%
decrease
|
10% decrease
|
|||||||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dollar-linked balances:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
3,367 | 1,684 | 33,674 | (1,684 | ) | (3,367 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Restricted deposits*
|
60 | 30 | 604 | (30 | ) | (60 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Trade receivables
|
3,775 | 1,888 | 37,750 | (1,888 | ) | (3,775 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Trade payables
|
(299 | ) | (149 | ) | (2,987 | ) | 149 | 299 | ||||||||||||
|
Payable to licensors
|
(1,057 | ) | (528 | ) | (10,570 | ) | 528 | 1,057 | ||||||||||||
|
Total dollar-linked balances
|
5,846 | 2,925 | 58,471 | (2,925 | ) | (5,846 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Euro-linked balances:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
155 | 77 | 1,550 | (77 | ) | (155 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Trade payables
|
(219 | ) | (110 | ) | (2,196 | ) | 110 | 219 | ||||||||||||
| (64 | ) | (33 | ) | (646 | ) | 33 | 64 | |||||||||||||
|
Trade payables linked to pound sterling
|
40 | 20 | 399 | (20 | ) | (40 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Total
|
5,882 | 2,912 | 58,224 | (2,912 | ) | (5,822 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
*
|
See also Note 12b(1).
|
NOTE 3 – FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT – (continued)
Set forth below is data regarding exchange rates and the CPI:
|
Exchange rate of
USD 1
|
Exchange rate of
€ 1
|
Exchange rate of
£ 1
|
Israeli CPI*
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
Points
|
|||||||||||||
|
As of December 31:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
3.775 | 5.442 | 6.111 | 122.57 | ||||||||||||
|
2010
|
3.549 | 4.738 | 5.493 | 125.83 | ||||||||||||
|
Percentage increase (decrease) in:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
(0.7 | )% | 2.7 | % | 10.2 | % | 3.9 | % | ||||||||
|
2010
|
(6.0 | )% | (12.9 | )% | (10.1 | )% | 2.7 | % | ||||||||
|
*
|
Based on the index for the month ending on each balance sheet date, on the basis of 2000 average = 100.
|
Set forth below is information on the linkage of monetary items:
|
December 31, 2009
|
December 31, 2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dollar
|
Other
currencies
|
NIS
|
Dollar
|
Other
currencies
|
NIS
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
33,674 | 1,949 | 70,267 | 73,394 | 320 | 38,032 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Short term bank deposits
|
– | – | – | 28,037 | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Other receivables
|
– | – | 2,313 | 5,294 | – | 1,019 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Trade receivables
|
37,750 | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-current assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restricted deposits
|
604 | – | 3,100 | 569 | – | 1,845 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
72,028 | 1,949 | 75,680 | 107,294 | 320 | 40,896 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current maturities of bank loan:
|
– | – | – | – | – | 307 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Accounts payable and accruals:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trade
|
2,987 | 2,221 | 1,244 | 1,792 | 515 | 1,542 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
OCS
|
– | – | 14,005 | – | – | 5,993 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Licensors
|
10,570 | – | – | 1,491 | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Other
|
– | – | 7,307 | – | – | 6,775 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Long-term bank loan, net of current maturities
|
– | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
13,557 | 2,221 | 22,556 | 3,283 | 515 | 14,617 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Net asset value
|
58,471 | (272 | ) | 53,124 | 104,011 | (195 | ) | 26,279 | ||||||||||||||||
NOTE 3 – FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT – (continued)
|
|
2)
|
Fair value of financial instruments
|
As of December 31, 2010, the financial instruments of the Group consist of non-derivative assets and liabilities (primarily working capital items and restricted deposits).
In view of their nature, the fair value of the financial instruments included in working capital is generally close or identical to their carrying amount. The fair value of the restricted cash in long-term deposits also approximates the carrying amount, as these financial instruments bear interest at a rate similar to the prevailing interest rate.
|
|
3)
|
Exposure to market risks and the management thereof
|
The trade receivable balance as of December 31, 2009 relates to the transaction with Ikaria Holdings, Inc. (“Ikaria”), which, as described in Note 15, was collected in April 2010. The Company has also invested in deposits and short-term government bonds. Accordingly, in the opinion of the Company’s management, the market risks to which the Company is exposed are primarily related to the exposure to currency risks, as mentioned above. Additionally, the Company’s management does not consider the interest rate risk mentioned in paragraph 4 below to be material.
|
|
4)
|
Interest rate risks
|
The Company’s management does not consider interest rate risk to be material as the Company holds deposits and short-term government bonds whose fair value and/or cash flows are not materially affected by changes in the interest rate.
|
|
b.
|
Credit risks
|
Credit risks are managed at the Group level. These risks relate to cash and cash equivalents, bank deposits and trade receivables.
The Group’s cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2009 and 2010 were mainly deposited with major Israeli banks. In the Company’s opinion, the credit risk in respect of these balances is remote.
The Group considers its maximum exposure to credit risk to be as follows:
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2009
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||
|
Assets:
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
105,890 | 111,746 | ||||||
|
Short term bank deposits
|
– | 28,037 | ||||||
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
37,750 | – | ||||||
|
Other receivables
|
2,313 | 6,313 | ||||||
|
Restricted deposits
|
3,704 | 2,414 | ||||||
|
Total
|
149,657 | 148,510 | ||||||
|
|
c.
|
Liquidity risks
|
The Company’s management monitors rolling forecasts of the Group’s liquidity reserves on the basis of anticipated cash flows and maintains the liquidity balances at a level that is sufficient to meet its needs.
As mentioned in Note 1, although the Company has succeeded in out-licensing two of its products, it cannot determine with reasonable certainty if and when it will become profitable on a current basis. Management of the Company believes that the Company’s current cash balances will enable it to execute its operating plans through the end of 2012. Accordingly, in the event that the Company does not continue to generate cash from its operating activities, the Company’s long-term operations in their current form are contingent on the Company’s raising additional capital in the future.
NOTE 3 – FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT – (continued)
|
|
d.
|
Financial instruments
|
As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, the Group’s financial instruments consisted solely of loans and receivables.
NOTE 4 – CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
As part of the financial reporting process, the Company’s management is required to make certain assumptions and estimates that may affect the value of the assets, liabilities, income, expenses and some of the disclosures included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. By their very nature, such estimates are subjective and complex and consequently may differ from actual results.
The accounting estimates and assumptions that are used in the preparation of the financial statements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectation of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Described below are the critical accounting estimates that are used in the preparation of the financial statements, the formulation of which required the Company’s management to make assumptions as to circumstances and events that involve significant uncertainty. In using its judgment to determine the accounting estimates, the Company takes into consideration, as appropriate, the relevant facts, past experience, the effect of external factors and reasonable assumptions under the circumstances.
|
|
a.
|
Development expenses
|
Development expenses are capitalized in accordance with the accounting policy described in Note 2q. The capitalization of costs is based on management’s judgment of technological and economic feasibility, which is usually achieved when a product development project reaches a predefined milestone, or when the Company enters into a transaction to sell the know-how that resulted from the development process. In determining the amount to be capitalized, management makes assumptions as to the future anticipated cash inflows from the assets, the discount rate and the anticipated period of future benefits. The Company’s management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, the foregoing conditions have not been met and therefore development expenses have not been capitalized for any project.
If management had assessed that the aforementioned conditions had been met, the capitalization of development costs would have increased the Group’s profit.
|
|
b.
|
Grants/loans from the OCS
|
In accordance with the accounting treatment described in Note 2q, the Company’s management is required to evaluate whether there is reasonable assurance that the grant/loan received will be paid or repaid. Additionally, whenever the grant/loan is initially recognized as income, management is required to evaluate whether the payment of royalties/repayment of loans to the OCS is considered more likely than not.
See Notes 12a(1) and 12a(2) with regard to the expected amount repayable to the OCS as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
c.
|
Revenue recognition
|
In accordance with the accounting treatment described in Note 2p, the Company’s management is required to evaluate whether it is probable that the economic benefits related to the out-licensing agreements with Ikaria and Cypress Bioscience will flow to the Group and whether it is possible to reliably measure the amount of the revenues relating to the transaction.
As of December 31, 2010, receipt of additional economic benefits associated with such transactions was not considered probable. Accordingly, no revenues with respect to additional milestone payments were recorded in the 2010 financial statements.
NOTE 5 – CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND SHORT-TERM BANK DEPOSITS
|
|
a.
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2009
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||
|
Cash on hand and in bank
|
700 | 1,642 | ||||||
|
Short-term bank deposits
|
105,190 | 110,104 | ||||||
| 105,890 | 111,746 | |||||||
The short-term bank deposits included in cash and cash equivalents bear interest at annual rates of between 0.65% and 1.51%. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents is close or identical to their fair value, since they bear interest at rates similar to the prevailing market interest rates.
|
|
b.
|
Short-term bank deposits
|
The short-term bank deposits are linked to the dollar and bear interest at annual rates of between 1.03% and 1.67%.
NOTE 6 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Set forth below are the composition of property and equipment and the accumulated depreciation thereon, grouped by major classifications, and the changes therein for the respective years:
|
Cost
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
Net book value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at
beginning
of year
|
Additions
during
year
|
Deletions
during
year
|
Balance at
end of
year
|
Balance at
beginning
of year
|
Additions
during
year
|
Deletions
during
year
|
Balance at
end of
year
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2007
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Composition in 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
446 | 250 | – | 696 | 76 | 35 | – | 111 | 370 | 585 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Computers and communications equipment
|
1,137 | 314 | – | 1,451 | 705 | 292 | – | 997 | 432 | 454 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Laboratory equipment,
net*
|
1,654 | 1,346 | – | 3,000 | 459 | 374 | – | 833 | 1,195 | 2,167 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Leasehold improvements
|
2,830 | 1,317 | – | 4,147 | 1,097 | 772 | – | 1,869 | 1,733 | 2,278 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6,067 | 3,227 | – | 9,294 | 2,337 | 1,473 | – | 3,810 | 3,730 | 5,484 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
* Item is net of OCS grants received – see b. below
|
(2,222 | ) | (28 | ) | – | (2,250 | ) | 478 | 334 | – | 812 | (1,744 | ) | (1,438 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOTE 6 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT – (continued)
Set forth below are the composition of property and equipment and the accumulated depreciation thereon, grouped by major classifications, and the changes therein for the respective years (cont.):
|
Cost
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
Net book value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at
beginning
of year
|
Additions
during
year
|
Deletions
during
year
|
Balance at
end of
year
|
Balance at
beginning
of year
|
Additions
during
year
|
Deletions
during
year
|
Balance at
end of
year
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Composition in 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
696 | 28 | – | 724 | 169 | 42 | – | 211 | 527 | 513 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Computers and communications equipment
|
1,549 | 372 | (772 | ) | 1,149 | 1,251 | 234 | (772 | ) | 713 | 298 | 436 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Laboratory equipment,
net*
|
3,136 | 1,510 | – | 4,646 | 1,300 | 611 | – | 1,911 | 1,836 | 2,735 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Leasehold improvements
|
4,147 | 47 | – | 4,194 | 2,633 | 736 | – | 3,369 | 1,514 | 825 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9,528 | 1,957 | (772 | ) | 10,713 | 5,353 | 1,623 | (772 | ) | 6,204 | 4,175 | 4,509 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
* Item is net of OCS grants received – see Note 12a(1)d
|
(2,250 | ) | – | – | (2,250 | ) | 1,150 | 338 | – | 1,488 | (1,100 | ) | (762 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOTE 7 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
Cost
|
Accumulated depreciation and impairment
|
Net book value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at
beginning
of year
|
Additions
during
year
|
Deletions
during
year
|
Balance at
end of
year
|
Balance at
beginning
of year
|
Additions
during
year
|
Deletions
during
year
|
Balance at
end of
year
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2007
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Composition in 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Intellectual property
|
1,568 | 1,856 | – | 3,424 | – | – | 603 | 603 | 1,568 | 2,821 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Computer software
|
549 | 172 | – | 721 | 134 | 203 | – | 337 | 415 | 384 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2,117 | 2,028 | – | 4,145 | 134 | 203 | 603 | 940 | 1,983 | 3,205 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cost
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
Net book value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at
beginning
of year
|
Additions
during
year
|
Deletions
during
year
|
Balance at
end of
year
|
Balance at
beginning
of year
|
Additions
during
year
|
Deletions
during
year
|
Balance at
end of
year
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Composition in 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Intellectual property
|
3,424 | 589 | (436 | ) | 3,577 | 603 | – | 148 | 751 | 2,821 | 2,826 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Computer software
|
721 | 39 | – | 760 | 337 | 207 | – | 544 | 384 | 216 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4,145 | 628 | (436 | ) | 4,337 | 940 | 207 | 148 | 1,295 | 3,205 | 3,042 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cost
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
Net book value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at
beginning
of year
|
Additions
during
year
|
Deletions
during
year
|
Balance at
end of
year
|
Balance at
beginning
of year
|
Additions
during
year
|
Deletions
during
year
|
Balance at
end of
year
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Composition in 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Intellectual property
|
3,577 | – | (1,846 | ) | 1,731 | 751 | – | – | 751 | 2,826 | 980 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Computer software
|
760 | 347 | – | 1,107 | 544 | 191 | – | 735 | 216 | 372 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4,337 | 347 | (1,846 | ) | 2,838 | 1,295 | 191 | – | 1,486 | 3,042 | 1,352 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
During 2009, intellectual property dispositions with a total cost of NIS 436,000 were recorded to cost of revenues in respect of the BL-1040 project (see Note 14). During 2010, the Group wrote-off intellectual property in the total amount of NIS 1,846,000 in respect of three projects that were terminated — BL-2030, BL-4060 and BL-5020.
Depreciation in respect of computer software and the amortization of intellectual property in 2010 were included in research and development expenses.
NOTE 8 – LONG-TERM BANK LOAN
|
|
a.
|
Composition:
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2009
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||
|
Loan balance
|
– | 739 | ||||||
|
Less current maturities
|
– | (307 | ) | |||||
| – | 432 | |||||||
The loan is denominated in NIS, linked to the CPI and bears interest at an annual rate of 2.4%. The book value of the loan approximates its fair value.
The loan is repayable in 36 monthly installments.
|
|
b.
|
Future repayments of long-term bank loans (other than current maturities) in the years subsequent to the balance sheet date are as follows:
|
|
2012
|
307
|
|||
|
2013
|
125
|
|||
|
432
|
NOTE 9 – EQUITY
|
|
a.
|
Share capital
|
As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, share capital is composed of Ordinary Shares, par value NIS 0.01 per share, as follows:
|
Number of Ordinary Shares
|
||||||||
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2009
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Authorized share capital
|
250,000,000 | 250,000,000 | ||||||
|
Issued share capital
|
123,497,029 | 123,558,660 | ||||||
|
Paid-up share capital
|
123,497,029 | 123,558,660 | ||||||
|
In NIS
|
||||||||
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2009
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Authorized share capital
|
2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | ||||||
|
Issued share capital
|
1,234,970 | 1,235,587 | ||||||
|
Paid-up share capital
|
1,234,970 | 1,235,587 | ||||||
The Ordinary Shares are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. The price per Ordinary Share as of December 31, 2010 was NIS 3.21.
|
|
b.
|
Rights related to shares
|
The Ordinary Shares confer upon their holders voting and dividend rights and the right to receive assets of the Company upon its liquidation. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, all outstanding share capital consisted of Ordinary Shares.
NOTE 9 – EQUITY – (continued)
|
|
c.
|
Changes in the Company’s equity
|
|
|
1)
|
In February 2007, the Company conducted an initial public offering on the TASE of 28,690,000 Ordinary Shares and 14,345,000 Series 1 warrants. The net proceeds to the Company from the issuance amounted to approximately NIS 198,000,000.
|
Each Series 1 warrant was exercisable into one Ordinary Share at an exercise price of NIS 8.50 which, in accordance with the original terms of such warrants, was linked to the CPI (subject to adjustments). The warrants were exercisable over a period of two years from the date of their listing for trading. The consideration allocated to the warrants was approximately NIS 32,100,000, computed under the Black-Scholes model, which reflected their fair value as of the issuance date. Issuance costs related to the warrants of approximately NIS 2,100,000 were recorded as an expense. As of December 31, 2007, the warrants were marked to market on the Company’s balance sheet (at the market price on the TASE), with the change in fair value of the warrants recorded to income (see also Note 2l).
In July 2008, the exercise price of the warrants ceased to be linked to the CPI and, accordingly, the market value of the warrants at that time, amounting to NIS 947,000, was reclassified from current liabilities to equity.
In February 2009, 380 warrants were exercised for total consideration of NIS 3,000, and the remaining 14,344,620 warrants expired.
|
|
2)
|
In July 2009, the Company issued 46,667,719 Ordinary Shares in a public rights offering. The total net proceeds from the offering amounted to NIS 51,800,000, after deducting NIS 900,000 of issuance costs. The rights offering included an embedded benefit of 25% to the Company’s shareholders (such embedded benefit being essentially a stock dividend for financial statement purposes).
|
|
|
3)
|
In December 2009, the Company issued 11,293,419 Ordinary shares and 7,528,946 Series 2 warrants in a public offering. Each warrant is exercisable into one Ordinary Share at an exercise price of NIS 6.08 (not linked). The warrants are exercisable for a period of two years from the date that they were registered for trading.
|
The total net proceeds from the offering amounted to NIS 45,700,000, after deducting NIS 1,400,000 in issuance costs. The issuance costs have been allocated between share premium and the warrants based on the relative market value (as indicated on the TASE) of the shares and warrants on the date of the offering.
|
|
d.
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
1)
|
In 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock compensation plan for employees and consultants pursuant to which 1,328,500 Ordinary Shares were reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options. In 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an expansion of the stock compensation plan for employees and consultants to allow the allotment of an additional up to 2,136,022 options exercisable into Ordinary Shares. In 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a grant to employees and consultants of 9,996,566 shares and options exercisable into Ordinary Shares.
|
In February and March 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the grant of 4,020,300 options to the Company’s employees and members of the Scientific Advisory Board. Each option is exercisable into one Ordinary Share, par value NIS 0.01. The options vest as follows: 50% at the end of two years from the grant date; 25% at the end of three years from the grant date; and the remaining 25% at the end of four years from the grant date.
NOTE 9 – EQUITY – (continued)
|
|
2)
|
Employee stock options
|
The following table contains additional information concerning options granted to employees and directors under the existing stock-option plans:
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Number of
options
|
Weighted
average
exercise price
(in NIS)
|
Number of
options
|
Weighted
average
exercise price
(in NIS)
|
Number of
options
|
Weighted
average
exercise price
(in NIS)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
5,071,486 | 1.02 | 5,509,986 | 1.16 | 2,053,551 | 2.44 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Granted
|
491,500 | 2.98 | 198,330 | 2.31 | 4,905,400 | 4.11 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(53,000 | ) | 4.25 | (658,137 | ) | 2.61 | (443,873 | ) | 4.89 | |||||||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
– | – | (2,996,628 | ) | 0.04 | (53,103 | ) | 0.46 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
5,509,986 | 1.16 | 2,053,551 | 2.44 | 6,461,975 | 3.56 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
2,972,124 | 0.67 | 689,946 | 2.92 | 1,120,270 | 1.69 | ||||||||||||||||||
The total consideration received from the exercise of stock options during 2009 and 2010 was NIS 116,000 and NIS 26,000, respectively.
The weighted average price of the Company’s shares on the dates of exercise was NIS 2.42 and NIS 3.53 for 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Set forth below is data regarding the range of exercise prices and weighted-average remaining contractual life (in years) for the options outstanding at the end of each of the years indicated.
|
As of December 31,
|
Number of
options
outstanding
|
Range of
exercise
prices
(in NIS)
|
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual life
(in years)
|
|||||||||
|
2008
|
5,509,986 | 0.04 – 5.04 | 7.45 | |||||||||
|
2009
|
2,053,551 | 0.04 – 5.04 | 6.56 | |||||||||
|
2010
|
6,461,975 | 0.04 – 5.04 | 4.69 | |||||||||
The Ordinary Shares allotted under these plans will confer the same rights as all other Ordinary Shares in the Company.
Employees of the Group have been granted options under Section 102 of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance (the “Ordinance”). Non-employees of the Group (service providers, consultants, etc.), as well as controlling shareholders in the Company (as this term is defined in Section 32(9) of the Ordinance), have been granted options under Section 3(i) of the Ordinance.
NOTE 9 – EQUITY – (continued)
The fair value of all options granted to employees through December 31, 2010 has been determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. These values are based on the following assumptions as of the applicable grant dates:
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
Expected dividend yield
|
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||
|
Expected volatility*
|
70 | % | 64 | % | 66 | % | ||||||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
5 | % | 5 | % | 4 | % | ||||||
|
Expected life of options (in years)
|
7 | 7 | 5 | |||||||||
|
*
|
Expected volatility has been computed on the basis of specific Company market data, as well as the data of similar companies operating in the same industry.
|
|
|
3)
|
Stock options to consultants
|
From inception through December 31, 2006, the Company issued to consultants options for the purchase of 220,990 Ordinary Shares at an average exercise price of USD 0.01 per share. In 2007, the Company changed the exercise price to NIS 0.039 per share. The options vest over four years
In 2007, the Group issued options to consultants for the purchase of 144,242 Ordinary Shares at an average exercise price of NIS 0.73 per share. The options vest over four years.
The above options may be exercised for a period of 10 years.
In 2010, the Group issued options to consultants for the purchase of 300,000 Ordinary Shares at an average exercise price of NIS 4.03 per share. The options vest over four years and may be exercised for a period of 5 years.
The Company’s management estimates the fair value of the options granted to consultants based on the value of services received over the vesting period of the applicable options. The value of such services (primarily in respect of clinical advisory services) is estimated based on the additional cash compensation the Company would need to pay if such options were not granted. The value of services recorded in 2008, 2009 and 2010 amounted to NIS 437,000, NIS 640,000 and NIS 1,054,000, respectively.
|
|
4)
|
See Note 16 regarding the option provided to Cypress Bioscience to pay up to half of the first milestone payment in consideration for the issuance of the Company’s Ordinary Shares.
|
NOTE 10 – TAXES ON INCOME
|
|
a.
|
Corporate taxation in Israel
|
Beginning with the 2008 tax year, the results of the Company and its Israeli subsidiaries for tax purposes are measured in nominal terms. Prior to 2008, results for tax purposes had been measured in real terms, taking into account changes in the CPI, pursuant to the Israeli Inflationary Adjustments Law, 1985.
The Partnership is not subject to tax under Israeli tax law; rather, each of the partners thereof (the Company and the Subsidiary) is liable for the tax applicable to the operations of the Partnership in proportion to their respective share in the Partnership’s results.
NOTE 10 – TAXES ON INCOME – (continued)
|
|
b.
|
Tax rates
|
The income of the Company and the Subsidiary is taxed at standard Israeli corporate tax rates. Israeli corporate tax rates for 2008 and thereafter are as follows: 2008 — 27%, 2009 — 26%, 2010 — 25%, 2011 — 24%, 2012 — 23%, 2013 — 22%, 2014 — 21%, 2015 — 20%, 2016 and thereafter — 18%.
Capital gains (except “real” capital gains on the sale of marketable securities, which are taxed at the standard corporate tax rates) are taxed as follows: capital gains derived after January 1, 2003 are subject to a tax rate of 25%, while capital gains derived until that date are taxed at the standard corporate tax rate.
|
|
c.
|
Tax loss carryforwards
|
As of December 31, 2010, the tax loss carryforwards of the Company were approximately NIS 252,000,000 and the tax loss carryforwards of the Subsidiary were approximately NIS 1,000,000. The tax loss carryforwards of the Company have no expiration date.
The Company has not created deferred tax assets in respect of these tax loss carryforwards. See Note 2o.
|
|
d.
|
Tax assessments
|
The Company and its subsidiaries have not been assessed for tax purposes since their respective incorporation or formation.
|
|
e.
|
Theoretical taxes
|
As described in Note 2o, the Company has not recognized any deferred tax assets in the financial statements, since the Company does not expect to generate taxable income in the foreseeable future. The tax on the Group’s profit before tax differs from the theoretical amount that would arise using the weighted average tax rate applicable to profits of the consolidated entities as follows:
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NIS in
thousands
|
NIS in
thousands
|
NIS in
thousands
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Income (loss) before taxes
|
27 | % | (114,849 | ) | 26 | % | (61,518 | ) | 25 | % | 7,440 | |||||||||||||
|
Theoretical tax expense (tax benefit)
|
(31,009 | ) | (15,995 | ) | 1,860 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Disallowed deductions (tax exempt income):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gain on adjusting warrants to fair value
|
(988 | ) | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
2,439 | 852 | 1,639 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other
|
52 | 51 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Difference between the measurement basis of income reported for tax purposes and the measurement basis of income for financial reporting purposes (see Note 10)
|
(2,491 | ) | (10 | ) | – | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Realization of tax loss carryforwards for which deferred taxes were not created
|
– | – | (3,652 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
NOTE 10 – TAXES ON INCOME – (continued)
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
NIS in
thousands
|
NIS in
thousands
|
NIS in
thousands
|
||||||||||
|
Increase in taxes for tax losses and timing differences incurred in the reporting year for which deferred taxes were not recognized
|
31,997 | 15,102 | 128 | |||||||||
|
Taxes on income for the reported year
|
– | – | – | |||||||||
|
|
f.
|
Deductible temporary differences
|
The amount of cumulative deductible temporary differences, other than unused tax loss carryforwards (as mentioned in c. above), for which deferred tax assets have not been recognized in the statement of financial position as of December 31, 2009 and 2010, were NIS 12,958,000 and NIS 13,086,000, respectively. These temporary differences have no expiration dates.
|
|
g.
|
Value-added tax (VAT)
|
The Company is jointly registered for VAT purposes together with certain of its subsidiaries.
NOTE 11 – EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The following table contains the data used in the computation of the basic earnings (loss) per share:
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||
|
Income (loss) as reported in financial statements
|
(114,849 | ) | (61,518 | ) | 7,440 | |||||||
|
Income (loss) attributed to ordinary shares
|
(114,849 | ) | (61,518 | ) | 7,440 | |||||||
|
Number of shares used in basic calculation (in thousands)
|
78,131 | 96,693 | 123,512 | |||||||||
|
Adjustment for incremental dilutive shares from the theoretical exercise of options and warrants
|
– | – | 1,035 | |||||||||
|
Number of shares used in diluted calculation (in thousands)
|
– | – | 124,547 | |||||||||
|
NIS
|
||||||||||||
|
Basic earnings (loss) per ordinary share*
|
(1.44 | ) | (0.63 | ) | 0.06 | |||||||
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per ordinary share*
|
– | – | 0.06 | |||||||||
|
*
|
The loss per share and the number of shares for the years 2008 and 2009 have been retroactively adjusted in order to give retroactive effect to the benefit embedded in the rights offering, as detailed in Note 9c(2). The embedded benefit, which is the equivalent of a stock dividend, in such rights offering was 25%.
|
Diluted loss per share data is not presented for 2008 and 2009, due to the antidilutive effect of the inclusion of potentially dilutive shares.
NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
|
|
a.
|
Commitments
|
|
|
1)
|
Agreement with the State of Israel for the operation of a biotechnology incubator (the “Incubator”)
|
As part of the Incubator Agreement between the Partnership and the State of Israel, represented by the OCS (see principal provisions below), the State of Israel has agreed to grant loans to the Partnership to partially finance projects approved by the OCS.
The loans bear interest in accordance with the Interest and Linkage Law, 1961 (as of December 31, 2009 and 2010 — 1.70% and 1.40%, respectively), and are repayable at the discretion of the Partnership (but subject to the conditions described below concerning the sale of project assets or the realization of income from the project), as follows:
|
|
•
|
In the three years of a project’s incubator stage, the loan is repayable, plus accrued interest.
|
|
|
•
|
In the subsequent two years, the loan is repayable under the same terms, provided that the Incubator undertakes to maintain the advancement of the project at a rate similar to that of the preceding years.
|
|
|
•
|
In the three following years, the loan is repayable with the addition of a double interest charge, provided that the Incubator undertakes to continue advancing the project at a rate similar to that of the preceding years.
|
If the Incubator sells assets or generates income from a project (including any intellectual property related thereto), at least 25% of the income from such sale must be used to repay the project loan, up to the original amount of the loan with the addition of interest as described herein. The Partnership is required to repay the loan in full upon the sale of a project’s intellectual property or the grant of an exclusive license to use the project’s intellectual property. The total payments to the State of Israel from such income will not exceed the original amount of the applicable loan with the addition of interest and linkage to the CPI. In certain circumstances, if the intellectual property or manufacturing rights are transferred outside of Israel, the repayment amounts may be greater.
Pursuant to the Incubator Agreement, the Incubator has undertaken to register a first-ranking pledge in favor of the OCS to cover the loans made to the Incubator. In accordance with the agreement, each pledge is specific to a loan for a specific project and includes a restriction on the transfer of, and/or licensing rights in, technologies that originate from the project, and on any equipment purchased for the use of the project. The Group has signed and submitted the pledge registration documents to the OCS.
The proceeds from the sale or use of a project-related intellectual property serve as the exclusive source for repayment of OCS loans financing such projects, and the sole collateral for the repayment of project loans are pledges on project-related intellectual property and assets purchased with loan proceeds.
In 2008, 2009 and 2010, the Group received NIS 9,240,000, NIS 6,338,000, and NIS 1,916,000, respectively, from the OCS, of which NIS 6,902,000, NIS 3,491,000, and NIS 842,000, respectively, were related to discontinued projects. The Company has agreed with the OCS on a procedure for the discontinuation of projects by the Incubator and the action that should be taken to forgive or repay loans received in respect of such discontinued projects.
The biotechnological incubators program is an initiative of the OCS that is designed to strengthen and promote the Israeli biotechnology industry, as well as biotechnology projects.
BioLineRx Ltd.
NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES – (continued)
This program was launched in late 2001, following publication of Directive No. 8.4 of the Director-General of Israel’s Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor (“Directive 8.4”). This directive implements the recommendations of the “Monitor” report, which reviewed ways to promote the Israeli biotechnology industry and recommended the establishment of for-profit incubators to support commercially viable projects by providing physical, organizational, professional, marketing and business infrastructure to promote research and development by early-stage biotechnology enterprises.
Directive 8.4 was amended in May 2004, to prescribe two tracks for operating biotech incubators (see (e) below). Immediately after the amendment of Directive 8.4, the OCS issued a call for proposals to establish and operate incubators. The Company, whose proposal was accepted by the OCS, entered into an agreement with the OCS, through the Partnership, for the operation of a designated biotechnology incubator. The principal provisions of the Incubator Agreement are as follows:
|
|
(a)
|
Period of the agreement
|
The Incubator Agreement originally had a six-year period expiring on December 31, 2010. However, in accordance with an approval certificate that was received from the OCS, the Incubator Agreement was extended for two additional years, through 2012, and it was also agreed that the Group would be permitted to file a request for an additional one-year extension (through December 2013) prior to expiration of the first extension.
|
|
(b)
|
Scope of Incubator operations
|
The Incubator is designed for the simultaneous operation of at least eight OCS-approved projects. The Group may operate additional projects within the Incubator’s facilities that are not funded by the State or under the incubator program, provided that the operation of such additional projects does not interfere with OCS-approved projects.
|
|
(c)
|
Summary of the Group’s obligations
|
Within the framework of the Incubator Agreement, the Group has agreed to operate a biotechnology-designated incubator, to identify projects suitable for OCS approval, to make adequate premises and physical infrastructure available for at least eight projects and to provide administrative, organizational, professional and business support to the projects in order to facilitate research and development of commercially viable biotechnology projects. Among other things, some minimum requirements have been set for Incubator staff in terms of skills and employment levels. In addition, the Group has agreed to maintain a central laboratory for the use of all projects, equip the laboratory in accordance with the specifications provided in Directive 8.4 and in the Group’s incubator proposal, and operate the Incubator using capable personnel. The Group is also required to make consulting and auditing services (accounting, legal, patent consulting, quality assurance, information science services, regulatory consulting and clinical trials) available to the projects at an acceptable scope and quality, from service providers approved by the OCS. The Group has undertaken to invest at least NIS 2,700,000 per year in the operation of the Incubator.
|
|
(d)
|
Summary of OCS obligations
|
The OCS has undertaken to finance 50% of the cost of the equipment required for setting up the central laboratory and to make available State loans to each of the projects approved by the OCS at the rates of 85%, 80% and 75% of the project’s approved budget in its first three years of operation, respectively, which are to be repaid to the State as described above. Each Incubator project is limited to a period of three years and a maximum budget of NIS 8,100,000, in respect of which the Group is responsible for obtaining the complementary financing (15% to 25%) for all three years, as described above.
NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES – (continued)
In exchange for the services from the Incubator, the Group is entitled to receive participation by the OCS in operating expenses of up to 20% of the personnel costs associated with each project’s approved budget, and may not collect additional payments in respect of the basket of services required by the OCS. The participation limit also applies to the operating expenses of the central laboratory, but does not apply to the costs of consumable materials.
|
|
(e)
|
The different tracks
|
Directive 8.4 offers two tracks for the operation of an incubator. Under the first track, each project is incorporated as a separate and independent company in which the incubator receives shares (the separate companies will allocate at least 30% of their share capital to the holder of the license/knowhow, up to 5% of the share capital for incubator services, and the remaining shares will be allotted to the incubator and other investors in proportion to their investments in the independent company, including the incubator’s investments derived from State loans).
Under the second track, the projects are directly run within the incubator by the concessioner, with the holder of the license/know-how being entitled to a fixed amount for the use of his know-how as well as to royalties upon the sale of the knowhow and in respect of the sales of a final product developed under the project. An incubator operating under the second track is allowed to operate additional specific projects under the guidelines of the first track, subject to fulfillment of the provisions in the guidelines. The Group has elected to operate the Incubator under the second track.
|
|
(f)
|
Primary restrictions imposed on the Group and the Incubator
|
The agreement stipulates certain restrictions regarding operation of the Incubator and the projects, including, among others: maximum ownership of 15% in the Incubator by university research institutions; a limitation of subcontracting to no more than 40% of the approved budget; ownership by the Group (or the project company under the first track) of the intellectual property created in the project (it should be noted that an exception to this rule was carved out in a recent amendment to the R&D law from January 2011 regarding academic institutions); a prohibition on duplicate grants and participation or duplicity of projects; compliance with guidelines on investment of funds; restrictions on the terms of the licensing agreements with the holders of the know-how, which mainly involves securing the rights of the OCS; compliance with the Israel R&D Law (the Encouragement of Research and Development in Industry Law) in terms of keeping in Israel the intellectual property and manufacturing rights relating to OCS-funded projects.
|
|
(g)
|
Repayment of loans
|
Repayment of State loans is restricted to a project’s own resources out of the proceeds received from the sale or licensing of a project (at least 25% of the proceeds). The sale or licensing of the technology is subject to payment of the aforementioned royalties, up to the amount of the loans received from the State for such project.
The State is entitled to foreclose on the collateral related to a given project to secure repayment of the related loan at the end of eight years from the date of project approval, or even earlier, in the event of a breach of the Incubator Agreement by the Group, liquidation, and other events as set forth in the agreement.
NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES – (continued)
|
|
(h)
|
Security
|
The Group has provided a bank guarantee to the OCS in the amount of NIS 8,100,000 to secure its liabilities under the Incubator Agreement. After two years from the initial date of the Incubator Agreement, the amount of the guarantee is reduced every year by half the amount of the Incubator’s reported approved expenses, subject to a minimum guarantee of NIS 1,500,000 (see Note 12b). Additionally, the rights in the various projects are pledged to the State to secure repayment of the loan out of project proceeds. With respect to incubators operating under the second track, a floating charge is placed on all intellectual property and all equipment purchased in connection with a project, including a restriction on the transfer or licensing of the technology created in the project. The collateral discussed in this paragraph may be forfeited even after the repayment period or upon breach of the Incubator Agreement.
|
|
(i)
|
To the best knowledge of the Company’s management, as of the date of approval of these financial statements, the Group is in compliance with its material obligations to the OCS under the Incubator Agreement.
|
With respect to the accounting treatment of State loans, see Note 2r.
|
|
2)
|
Obligation to pay royalties to the Government of Israel
|
The Company is required to pay royalties to the Government of Israel, computed on the basis of proceeds from the sale or license of products whose development was supported by Government grants.
This obligation relates solely to the Government’s financial participation in the development of products by the Company outside the framework of the Incubator operated by the Partnership.
In accordance with the terms of the financial participation, the Government is entitled to royalties on the sale or license of any product whose development was supported with Government participation. These royalties are 3% in the first three years from initial repayment, 4% of sales in the three subsequent years and 5% of sales in the seventh year until repayment of 100% of the grants (linked to the USD) received by the Company plus annual interest at the LIBOR rate. As of December 31, 2010, the maximum amount of royalties payable by the Company to the Government of Israel is NIS 3,000,000.
The Group’s aggregate contingent liability to the OCS, both in respect of loans received in the framework of the biotechnology incubator (see paragraph (1) above), as well as the grants described herein, amounted to NIS 13,400,000 as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
3)
|
Licensing agreements
|
From time to time, the Group enters into in-licensing agreements with academic institutions, research institutions and companies in connection with development of certain technologies (the “licensors”).
The objective of each engagement with a licensor is to obtain rights for one or more drugs in the preliminary stages of development by the licensors, to continue joint development of the drugs by the Group and the licensors until advanced stages of development and, consequently, to manufacture, distribute and market the drugs or to out-license the development, manufacture and commercialization rights to third parties. Such post-development activities are carried out by either the Group and/or by companies or institutions to which the Group has entered into an out-license agreement, subject to certain restrictions stipulated in the various agreements.
NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES – (continued)
The licenses that have been granted to the Group are broad and comprehensive, and generally include various provisions and usage rights, as follows: (i) territorial scope of the license (global); (ii) term of the license (unrestricted but not shorter than the life of the patent); and (iii) development of the therapeutic compound (allowing the Group to perform all development activities on its own, or by outsourcing under Group supervision, as well as out-licensing development under the license to other companies, subject to the provisions of the licensing agreements).
According to the provisions of the licensing agreements, the intellectual property rights in the development of any licensed technology remain with the licensor until the date the applicable license agreement is effective, while the rights in products and/or other deliverables developed by the Group after the license is granted belong to the Group. In cases where the licensor has a claim to an invention that was jointly developed with the Group, the licensor also co-owns the related intellectual property. In any event, the scope of the license also covers these rights.
In addition, the Group generally undertakes in the licensing agreements to protect registered patents resulting from developments under the various licenses, to promote the registration of developments in cooperation with the licensor, and to bear responsibility for all related costs. Pursuant to the various agreements, the Group will work to register the various patents worldwide, and if the Group decides not to initiate or continue a patent registration proceeding in a given country, the Group is required to notify the applicable licensor to this effect and the licensor will be entitled to take action for registration of the patent in such country.
The consideration paid pursuant to the licensing agreements includes several components that are payable over the license period and that relate, inter alia, to the progress made in research and development activities, as well as commercial success, as follows: (a) one-time payment of up to USD 200,000 and/or periodic payments of up to USD 30,000 per year; (b) royalties on amounts the Group receives from an out-licensing transaction that range from 20% to 29.5% of net consideration; (c) payments through the early stages of development (i.e. through the end of phase 2) of up to USD 150,000; (d) payments of up to USD 2,000,000 upon the achievement of milestones necessary for advancing to phase 3; (e) payments of up to USD 5,000,000 from the end of a successful phase 3 trial through approval of the therapeutic compound; and (f) royalties on sales of the final product resulting from development under the license or including any component thereof, ranging between 3%-5% of the Group’s net sales of the product.
A license agreement may be cancelled, generally upon the occurrence of one of the following events: (a) the Group’s failure to meet certain milestones stipulated in the applicable license agreement and appended timetables; (b) default, insolvency, receivership, liquidation, etc., of the Group that is not imposed and/or lifted within the timeframe stipulated in the license agreement; and (c) fundamental breach of the license agreement that is not corrected within the stipulated timeframe. In addition, some of the agreements may be cancelled with prior notice of 30 to 90 days, due to unsuccessful development or any other cause.
The Group has undertaken to indemnify the various licensors, their employees, officers, representatives or anyone acting on their behalf for any damage and/or expense that they may incur in connection with the Group’s use of a license granted to it, all in accordance with the terms stipulated in the applicable license agreements.
Some of the license agreements are accompanied by consulting, support and cooperation agreements, pursuant to which the Group is committed to pay the various licensers a fixed monthly amount, over the period stipulated in the agreement, for their assistance in the continued research and development under the license.
NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES – (continued)
|
|
4)
|
Lease agreements
|
|
|
a)
|
The Company has entered into an operating lease agreement in connection with the lease of its premises. The agreement expires on December 15, 2012. The Group has an option to extend the lease agreement for two additional periods of 24 months each. The annual lease fees are linked to the dollar and amount to approximately NIS 921,000. As to bank deposits pledged to secure the Company’s liability under the lease agreement, see Note 12b(2).
|
|
|
b)
|
The Company has entered into operating lease agreements in connection with a number of vehicles. The lease periods are generally for three years. The annual lease fees, linked to the dollar, are approximately NIS 1,816,000. To secure the terms of the lease agreements, the Group has made certain prepayments to the leasing companies, representing approximately two months of lease payments. These amounts were recorded as prepaid expenses. See also Note 14b.
|
|
|
5)
|
Early Development Program (“EDP”) agreement
|
In January 2007, the Company entered into an agreement with Pan Atlantic for the funding of an early development program (the “EDP Agreement”). According to the EDP Agreement, Pan Atlantic undertook to provide grants for the promotion of drug-development projects in the preliminary stages of research in an aggregate amount of up to USD 5,000,000, in semi-annual “calls” of up to USD 625,000 each, through April 2011. In parallel, for every dollar of EDP project funding provided by Pan Atlantic, the Company committed to provide twenty cents of funding (i.e., a funding ratio of 5:1). Pan Atlantic undertakings under the EDP agreement are not subject to Pan Atlantic being a lender to, or a shareholder of, the Company.
In consideration for the EDP funding commitment, the Company granted to Pan Atlantic the right to participate in a future initial public offering of the Company outside of Israel, at the public offering price, in an amount of up to USD 5,000,000.
During 2008, 2009 and 2010, Pan Atlantic provided funding to the Group of NIS 2,876,000, NIS 4,881,000 and NIS 3,877,000, respectively, under the EDP Agreement. The amounts recognized as a reduction of research and development expenses in 2008, 2009 and 2010 were NIS 2,525,000, NIS 3,297,000 and NIS 2,997,000, respectively.
|
|
b.
|
Contingent liabilities
|
Guarantees and liens:
|
|
1)
|
As part of the Group’s obligations under the Incubator Agreement and to secure the Group’s liabilities to the OCS, the Company has provided a NIS 8,100,000 bank guarantee (linked to the CPI) in favor of Israel’s Ministry of Finance.
|
The guarantee is valid through March 2011. According to the Incubator Agreement, after the two year anniversary of the initial date of the Incubator Agreement, the amount of the guarantee will be reduced every year by half of the amount of the Incubator’s reported approved expenses. As of December 31, 2010, the balance of the guarantee amounted to approximately NIS 1,500,000.
To secure the above guarantee, the Group has pledged to a bank a short-term deposit in the amount of NIS 1,800,000, which is presented under non-current assets.
|
|
2)
|
To secure the Company’s liability to the lessor of its premises, the Group has pledged several dollar-denominated bank deposits in the amount of USD 160,000 (NIS 569,000), which are presented under non-current assets.
|
NOTE 13 – TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES WITH RELATED PARTIES
Transactions with related parties
Expenses (income):
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||
|
Participation in EDP project funding (see below)
|
(2,525 | ) | (3,297 | ) | (2,997 | ) | ||||||
|
Benefits to related parties:
|
||||||||||||
|
Compensation and benefits to senior management, including benefit component of option grants
|
10,561 | 7,039 | 8,208 | |||||||||
|
Number of individuals to which this benefit related
|
5 | 6 | 5 | |||||||||
|
Compensation and benefits to directors, including benefit component of option grants
|
1,074 | 584 | 858 | |||||||||
|
Number of individuals to which this benefit related
|
3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
This amount relates to a grant received from a related party of the Company, in accordance with the EDP Agreement as detailed in Note 12a(5).
Key management compensation
Key management includes directors (executive and non-executive), executive officers and the internal auditor. The compensation paid or payable to key management for services during each of the years indicated is presented below.
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||
|
Salaries and other short-term employee benefits
|
4,084 | 5,115 | 5,609 | |||||||||
|
Post-employment benefits
|
365 | 320 | 343 | |||||||||
|
Other long-term benefits
|
42 | 36 | 42 | |||||||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
7,144 | 2,152 | 3,072 | |||||||||
| 11,635 | 7,623 | 9,066 | ||||||||||
NOTE 14 – SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION
|
|
a.
|
Other receivables
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2009
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||
|
Withholding tax*
|
– | 5,294 | ||||||
|
Institutions
|
1,991 | 649 | ||||||
|
Grants receivable from the OCS
|
322 | 370 | ||||||
| 2,313 | 6,313 | |||||||
|
*
|
See Note 15.
|
|
|
b.
|
Long-term prepaid expenses
|
The prepaid expenses relate to operating lease agreements in respect of the vehicles used by the Group, and, in 2009, materials utilized by the Company to produce the BL-1040 compound amounting to NIS 880,000. During 2010, after an assessment of the Group regarding the realizable value of the materials, they were written off to R&D expenses.
NOTE 14 – SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION – (continued)
|
|
c.
|
Accounts payable and accruals
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2009
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||
|
1) Trade:
|
||||||||
|
Accounts payable:
|
||||||||
|
In Israel
|
1,224 | 1,539 | ||||||
|
Overseas
|
5,208 | 2,307 | ||||||
|
Checks payable
|
20 | 3 | ||||||
| 6,452 | 3,849 | |||||||
|
2) Other:
|
||||||||
|
Payroll and related expenses
|
1,318 | 1,496 | ||||||
|
Accrual for vacation and recreation pay
|
881 | 1,092 | ||||||
|
Accrued expenses
|
4,924 | 4,176 | ||||||
|
Grants on account of EDP project development financing not yet recognized in income
|
2,896 | 3,776 | ||||||
|
Other
|
184 | 11 | ||||||
| 10,203 | 10,551 | |||||||
The carrying amount of accounts payable and accruals is close or identical to their fair value, as the effect of discounting is not material.
|
|
d.
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||
|
Payments to licensors*
|
– | 17,817 | 25,571 | |||||||||
|
Payment to the OCS*
|
– | 4,369 | – | |||||||||
|
Intellectual property dispositions
|
– | 436 | – | |||||||||
| – | 22,622 | 25,571 | ||||||||||
|
|
*
|
See Notes 15 and 16
|
NOTE 14 – SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION – (continued)
|
|
e.
|
Research and development expenses — net
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||
|
Payroll and related expenses, including vehicles
|
21,161 | 16,384 | 18,566 | |||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
2,180 | 1,633 | 1,705 | |||||||||
|
Impairment of intellectual property
|
– | 148 | 1,846 | |||||||||
|
Patent related expenses
|
3,841 | 2,907 | 1,770 | |||||||||
|
Research and development services
|
95,665 | 66,534 | 16,265 | |||||||||
|
Professional fees
|
594 | 1,113 | 1,999 | |||||||||
|
Materials
|
1,693 | 248 | 301 | |||||||||
|
Overseas travel
|
2,231 | 471 | 215 | |||||||||
|
Office supplies and telephone
|
2,699 | 2,661 | 2,682 | |||||||||
|
Payments to the OCS (see Notes 15, 16)
|
– | 8,739 | 17,438 | |||||||||
|
Other
|
1,691 | 187 | 360 | |||||||||
| 131,755 | 101,025 | 63,147 | ||||||||||
|
Less – OCS participations in research and development costs – see also Notes 12a(1) and (2)
|
(23,074 | ) | (7,426 | ) | (5,184 | ) | ||||||
|
Less – participations in research and development costs by a related party – see Note 13
|
(2,525 | ) | (3,297 | ) | (2,997 | ) | ||||||
| 106,156 | 90,302 | 54,966 | ||||||||||
|
|
f.
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||
|
Payroll and related expenses
|
– | 1,396 | 2,090 | |||||||||
|
Marketing
|
– | 1,400 | 2,258 | |||||||||
|
Overseas travel
|
– | 289 | 261 | |||||||||
| – | 3,085 | 4,609 | ||||||||||
|
|
g.
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||
|
Payroll and related expenses, including vehicles
|
7,863 | 6,792 | 6,205 | |||||||||
|
Professional fees
|
3,707 | 2,499 | 6,540 | |||||||||
|
Office supplies and telephone
|
170 | 121 | 111 | |||||||||
|
Office maintenance
|
100 | 117 | 69 | |||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
99 | 121 | 109 | |||||||||
|
Other
|
1,144 | 1,532 | 1,841 | |||||||||
| 13,083 | 11,182 | 14,875 | ||||||||||
NOTE 14 – SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION – (continued)
|
|
h.
|
Finance income
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||
|
Gain on change in fair value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
|
273 | 98 | – | |||||||||
|
Income from interest and exchange differences on deposits
|
12,728 | 3,830 | 3,056 | |||||||||
| 13,001 | 3,928 | 3,056 | ||||||||||
|
|
i.
|
Finance expenses
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
NIS in thousands
|
||||||||||||
|
Exchange differences
|
12,172 | 2,064 | 8,696 | |||||||||
|
Bank commissions
|
97 | 100 | 59 | |||||||||
| 12,269 | 2,164 | 8,755 | ||||||||||
NOTE 15 – IKARIA AGREEMENT
During the third quarter of 2009, the Group entered into an out-licensing agreement with Ikaria, pursuant to which the Company granted Ikaria an exclusive, worldwide license to develop, manufacture and commercialize BL-1040 — a compound for the treatment of patients that have suffered an acute myocardial infarction (“AMI”). The agreement was signed in July 2009 and the transaction closed in September 2009, following receipt by the Company of OCS approval for the transaction, and transfer by the Company to Ikaria of all deliverables as stipulated under the agreement.
In accordance with the agreement, Ikaria is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to complete clinical development of and to commercialize BL-1040, and will bear all subsequent costs involved in the continued development of the product, the conduct and funding of its commercialization, and the prosecution and maintenance of patents.
Prior to execution of the agreement, the Company commenced a pilot phase 1/2 study designed to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of BL-1040. According to the agreement, the Company was required to bear the costs related to completion of the study from that stage. Such costs, related to follow up and documentation of results, were accrued in 2009.
Total payments to the Company under the agreement (not including royalties) are up to USD 282,500,000, subject to the achievement of certain milestones. Upon the closing of the agreement, the Company became entitled to the first payment in the amount of USD 7,000,000, which was received in October 2009. In connection with this payment, the Company undertook to indemnify Ikaria for any obligations it may have had to withhold taxes on such payment. In April 2010, the first milestone payment of USD 10,000,000 was received, in respect of which withholding tax of 15% was deducted. In March 2011, the Company filed an income tax return to request a refund of the tax withheld. Approximately 50% of the remaining payments are subject to certain development and regulatory milestones and the rest are subject to commercialization milestones. The abovementioned first two payments were recognized as revenues in 2009, and future milestone payments will be recognized as revenues if and when their receipt will become probable and their amount can be reliably measured.
The Company is also entitled to royalties on the net sales of any product developed under the agreement, ranging from 11% to 15%, depending on annual net sales levels.
NOTE 15 – IKARIA AGREEMENT – (continued)
The out-licensing agreement with Ikaria terminates on the date that the last patent rights in respect of BL-1040 are still valid (through at least 2024).
The Group is required to pay to the licensors of the BL-1040 compound 28% of all consideration received under the agreement. This expense is recorded in the statement of comprehensive income (loss) as cost of revenues. Additionally, the Group is obligated to repay the grants and loans received from the OCS regarding the BL-1040 project, in accordance with the Israeli R&D Law and as agreed with the OCS. This expense, up to the amount of funding received from the OCS, has been recorded in the statement of comprehensive (income) loss in research and development expenses, with the balance recorded in cost of revenues.
NOTE 16 – CYPRESS AGREEMENT
In June 2010, the Group entered into an exclusive, royalty-bearing out-licensing agreement with Cypress Bioscience for United States, Canada and Mexico (the “territories”), with regard to BL-1020, a therapeutic candidate for the treatment of schizophrenia. Under the agreement, Cypress Bioscience is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop, obtain regulatory approval for, and to commercialize BL-1020 in the territories, and will bear all subsequent costs involved in the continued development of the product, the conduct and funding of its commercialization, and the prosecution and maintenance of patents in the territories. The agreement became effective in August 2010, upon receipt of the consent of the OCS.
The total potential payments from the agreement to the Group, not including royalties, are up to USD 365,000,000, as follows: (1) USD 30,000,000 which was paid to the Group in August 2010 upon closing of the agreement; (2) up to USD 250,000,000 in connection with the achievement of certain performance-based milestones; and (3) up to USD 85,000,000 upon the achievement of certain sales-based milestones.
With regard to the first performance-based milestone of USD 10,000,000, Cypress Bioscience is entitled to pay up to one-half of the amount as an investment in the Company’s Ordinary Shares. In management’s estimation, based on a valuation received from an independent economic consulting firm, the fair value of this derivative instrument is not material and, therefore, it has not been deducted from the revenues recognized in respect of the upfront payment.
In addition to the above payments, the Group is also entitled under the agreement to royalties ranging from 12% to 18% of net sales of BL-1020 in the territories.
The Group retained the rights to BL-1020 for the rest of the world outside of the territories. In addition, pursuant to the agreement, the Group has the right to use all preclinical, clinical and other similar data generated by or on behalf of Cypress Bioscience, including its regulatory filings, subject to future reimbursement of 50% of expenses (as defined) incurred by Cypress Bioscience in generating such data and other information.
The Group is required to pay 22.5% of all consideration received under the agreement to the licensors of BL-1020. As a result, USD 6,750,000 was charged to cost of revenues during the period in respect of the USD 30,000,000 upfront payment.
In addition, the Group is obligated to repay grants received from the OCS regarding the BL-1020 project, in accordance with the Israeli R&D Law and as agreed with the OCS. In this regard, during the year, the Group recorded a liability to the OCS for the full amount of the grants received in respect of the project, in the total amount of NIS 17,438,000. This amount has been reflected in research and development expenses in these financial statements. The Group paid NIS 11,445,000 of this liability to the OCS in August 2010, leaving a remaining balance of NIS 5,993,000, reflected in current liabilities as of December 31, 2010.
In January 2011, Cypress Bioscience was acquired by the Royalty Pharma Group.
NOTE 17 – EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO THE BALANCE SHEET DATE
|
|
a.
|
In January 2011, the Group announced its intention to transfer its business development activities to Israel from the US.
|
|
|
b.
|
In February 2011, the Company granted 15,000 options to an employee, exercisable into Ordinary Shares at an exercise price of NIS 2.873 per share. The options vest over a four-year period.
|
|
|
c.
|
(Unaudited) In May 2011, the Company signed an agreement, effective June 1, 2011, to reacquire all development and commercialization rights to BL-1020 granted to Cypress Bioscience pursuant to the license agreement signed in June 2010 (see Note 16), as well as terminate the license agreement. In consideration for the reacquisition of such rights, including substantially all materials required for timely commencement of the BL-1020 clinical trial expected to commence in June 2011, the Company is obligated to pay Cypress Bioscience a 1% royalty on worldwide net sales of BL-1020 up to an aggregate cumulative amount of USD 80,000,000. In addition, the Company is obligated to pay Cypress Bioscience 10% of all future one-time payments received in respect of BL-1020, not to exceed an aggregate cumulative amount of USD 10,000,000, as reimbursement for costs that Cypress Bioscience incurred in developing the intellectual property portfolio, designing the clinical trial and conducting substantially all preparations to launch the trial.
|
___________, 2012
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 6. Indemnification of Directors, Officers and Employees
An Israeli company may indemnify an office holder in respect of certain liabilities either in advance of an event or following an event provided that a provision authorizing such indemnification is inserted in its articles of association. Our Articles of Association contain such a provision. An undertaking provided in advance by an Israeli company to indemnify an office holder with respect to a financial liability imposed on him or her in favor of another person pursuant to a judgment, settlement or arbitrator’s award approved by a court must be limited to events which in the opinion of the Board of Directors can be foreseen based on the company’s activities when the undertaking to indemnify is given, and to an amount or a criteria determined by the Board of Directors as reasonable under the circumstances, and such undertaking must detail the abovementioned events and amount or criteria.
In addition, a company may indemnify an office holder against the following liabilities incurred for acts performed as an office holder:
|
|
·
|
reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by the office holder as a result of an investigation or proceeding instituted against him or her by an authority authorized to conduct such investigation or proceeding, provided that (i) no indictment was filed against such office holder as a result of such investigation or proceeding; and (ii) no financial liability, such as a criminal penalty, was imposed upon him or her as a substitute for the criminal proceeding as a result of such investigation or proceeding or, if such financial liability was imposed, it was imposed with respect to an offense that does not require proof of criminal intent; and
|
|
|
·
|
reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by the office holder or imposed by a court in proceedings instituted against him or her by the company, on its behalf or by a third party or in connection with criminal proceedings in which the office holder was acquitted or as a result of a conviction for a crime that does not require proof of criminal intent.
|
An Israeli company may insure a director or officer against the following liabilities incurred for acts performed as a director or officer:
|
|
·
|
a breach of duty of care to the company or to a third party, including a breach arising out of the negligent conduct of an office holder;
|
|
|
·
|
a breach of duty of loyalty to the company, provided the director or officer acted in good faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not prejudice the interests of the company; and
|
|
|
·
|
financial liabilities imposed on the office holder for the benefit of a third party.
|
An Israeli company may not indemnify or insure an office holder against any of the following:
|
|
·
|
a breach of duty of loyalty, except to the extent that the office holder acted in good faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not prejudice the company;
|
|
|
·
|
a breach of duty of care committed intentionally or recklessly, excluding a breach arising out of the negligent conduct of the office holder;
|
|
|
·
|
an act or omission committed with intent to derive illegal personal benefit; or
|
|
|
·
|
a fine levied against the office holder.
|
Under the Israeli Companies Law, indemnification and insurance of office holders must be approved by our audit committee and our Board of Directors and, in respect of our directors, by our shareholders. Our directors and officers are currently covered by a directors and officers’ liability insurance policy with respect to specified claims. To date, no claims for liability have been filed under this policy. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers and the directors and officers of our subsidiaries providing them with indemnification for liabilities or expenses incurred as a result of acts performed by them in their capacity as our, or our subsidiaries’, directors and officers. This indemnification is limited both in terms of amount and coverage. In the opinion of the SEC, however, indemnification of directors and office holders for liabilities arising under the Securities Act is against public policy and therefore unenforceable.
Item 7. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Ordinary Shares
During the second half of 2007, we issued an aggregate of 1,024,555 ordinary shares. Of such shares, 570,300 were issued to Dr. Laster, then our chief executive officer, after approval by our shareholders at a meeting held on July 23, 2007 and the remaining ordinary shares were issued pursuant to the exercise by our employees and consultants of outstanding options to purchase our ordinary shares. The total aggregate consideration for such issuances was approximately NIS 18,600, or $4,528 (based on an exchange rate of $1.00 to NIS 4.1081, the average rate reported by the Bank of Israel for 2007).
During 2009, we issued an aggregate of 3,032,008 ordinary shares in connection with the exercise of warrants and stock options. Total aggregate consideration received in consideration for these issuances was approximately NIS 123,000, or $31,277 (based on an exchange rate of $1.00 to NIS 3.9326, the average rate reported by the Bank of Israel for 2009).
During 2010, we issued an aggregate of 65,543
ordinary shares in connection with the exercise of stock options. Total aggregate consideration received in consideration for these issuances was approximately NIS 26
,
000, or $6,971, (based on an exchange rate of $1.00 to NIS 3.73, the average rate reported by the Bank of Israel for 2010).
During 2011, we issued an aggregate of 44,481 ordinary shares in connection with the exercise of stock options. Total aggregate consideration received in consideration for these issuances was approximately NIS 1,700, or $475, (based on an exchange rate of $1.00 to NIS 3.579, the average rate reported by the Bank of Israel for 2011).
During the period from January 1, 2012 through February 22, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 10,000 ordinary shares in connection with the exercise of stock options. Total aggregate consideration received in consideration for these issuances was approximately NIS 390 or $104 (based on an exchange rate of $1.00 to NIS 3.752 reported by the Bank of Israel for February 22, 2012)
No underwriters were involved in the foregoing sales of ordinary shares. All of the securities referred to above were sold pursuant to an exemption from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act relative to sales of securities outside of the United States and/or under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as not involving a public offering, to the extent an exemption from such registration was required.
Public Offering of Ordinary Shares in Israel
Shelf registration
In May 2009, we filed a shelf prospectus with the TASE and Israeli Securities Authority, which was renewed in May 2011. In July 2011, we listed our ADSs on the Nasdaq Capital Market, and in August 2011, our shareholders approved a transition solely to U.S. reporting standards, in accordance with an applicable exemption under the Israel Securities Law. As a result of the transition, we are no longer able to use our Israeli shelf prospectus.
Rights offering
On July 2, 2009, we issued 46,666,719 shares in a rights offering to our shareholders by means of a shelf offering report, published on June 10, 2009, under the shelf prospectus of May 3, 2009. The per share price at the issuance was NIS 1.13 per share, or approximately $0.29 (based on the exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel for that date). The issuance was not underwritten, although Clal Finance Underwriting Ltd. provided marketing and distribution services in connection with the offering. The offering received a 99% response rate. The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the rights offering was approximately NIS 52.7 million, or approximately $13.7 million (based on the exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel for that date). The marketing and distribution services paid to Clal Finance Underwriting Ltd. in connection with this offering were approximately $140,000 (NIS 570,000) (based on the exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel for that date).
Follow-On Offering in Israel
On December 29, 2009, we issued 11,293,419 of our ordinary shares, and Series 2 Warrants exercisable for 7,528,946 of our ordinary shares, in a follow-on public offering in Israel, or the Israeli Follow-On Offering, on the TASE. The per share offering price of the Israeli Follow-On Offering was NIS 4.167, or approximately $1.10 (based on the exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel for that date), and the ordinary shares were offered in units consisting of three ordinary shares and two Series 2 Warrants, which were offered for no further consideration. The ordinary shares and the Series 2 Warrants are both listed for trading on the TASE and the Series 2 Warrants trade separately from the ordinary shares. The exercise price of the Series 2 Warrants is NIS 6.08, or approximately $1.60 (based on the exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel for that date). The Series 2 Warrants were originally scheduled to expire on December 29, 2011. In November 2011, our shareholders rejected a proposal to extend the exercise period of our outstanding Series 2 warrants. Therefore, any unexercised Series 2 warrants expired on December 29, 2011.
The offering was not underwritten. Clal Finance Underwriting Ltd. provided marketing and distribution services in connection with the offering as our agent. The offering received a 207% response rate. The aggregate gross proceeds raised were approximately NIS 47.1 million, or approximately $12.4 million (based on the exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel for that date). The fee paid to Clal Finance Underwriting Ltd., or Clal, for its marketing and distribution services was approximately NIS 1.2 million, or $310,395 (based on the exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel for that date). In addition, Clal is entitled to a commission equal to 1% of the total consideration we receive from exercises of Series 2 Warrants payable on a quarterly basis.
Private Placement of ADSs and Warrants
On February 22, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 5,244,301 of our ADSs for a purchase price of $2.86 per ADS. Purchasers also received an aggregate of 2,622,157 five-year warrants to purchase ADSs at an exercise price of $3.57 per ADS. The offering was not underwritten. Roth Capital Markets LLC provided marketing and distribution services in connection with the offering as our agent.
Item 8. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
Exhibits
See Exhibit Index.
The agreements included as exhibits to this registration statement contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties were made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and (i) were not intended to be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate; (ii) may have been qualified in such agreement by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement; (iii) may apply contract standards of “materiality” that are different from “materiality” under the applicable securities laws; and (iv) were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement.
The registrant acknowledges that, notwithstanding the inclusion of the foregoing cautionary statements, the registrant is responsible for considering whether additional specific disclosures of material information regarding material contractual provisions are required to make the statements in this registration statement not misleading.
|
(b)
|
Financial Statement Schedules
|
All schedules have been omitted because either they are not required, are not applicable or the information is otherwise set forth in the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto.
Item 9. Undertakings
|
(a)
|
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the provisions described in Item 6 hereof, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
|
|
(b)
|
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:
|
|
|
(1)
|
To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:
|
|
|
i.
|
To include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;
|
|
|
ii.
|
To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post- effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement.
|
|
|
iii.
|
To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement;
|
|
|
(2)
|
That for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4), or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.
|
|
|
(3)
|
That for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and this offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
|
|
|
(4)
|
To file a post-effective amendment to the registration statement to include any financial statements required by Item 8.A. of Form 20-F at the start of any delayed offering or throughout a continuous offering. Financial statements and information otherwise required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Act need not be furnished, provided that the registrant includes in the prospectus, by means of a post-effective amendment, financial statements required pursuant to this paragraph (a)(4) and other information necessary to ensure that all other information in the prospectus is at least as current as the date of those financial statements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to registration statements on Form F-3, a post-effective amendment need not be filed to include financial statements and information required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Act or Rule 3-19 of this chapter if such financial statements and information are contained in periodic reports filed with or furnished to the Commission by the registrant pursuant to section 13 or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that are incorporated by reference in the Form F-3.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form F-1 and has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Jerusalem, State of Israel on this 29
th
day of February, 2012.
|
BIOLINERX LTD.
|
|||
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Kinneret Savitsky | |
| Kinneret Savitsky, Ph.D. | |||
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|||
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTED, that each director and officer of BIOLINERX, LTD. whose signature appears below hereby appoints Kinneret Savitsky, Ph.D. and Philip Serlin, and each of them severally, acting alone and without the other, his/her true and lawful attorney-in-fact with full power of substitution or re-substitution, for such person and in such person’s name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign on such person’s behalf, individually and in each capacity stated below, any and all amendments, including post-effective -amendments to this Registration Statement, and to sign any and all additional registration statements relating to the same offering of securities of the Registration Statement that are filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as such person might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
|
Name
|
Title
|
Date
|
|
/s/ Kinneret Savitsky
|
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
|
February 29, 2012
|
|
Kinneret Savitsky, Ph.D.
|
||
|
/s/ Philip Serlin
|
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
Philip Serlin
|
(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
|
February 29, 2012
|
|
/s/ Aharon Schwartz
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
Aharon Schwartz, Ph.D.
|
February 29, 2012
|
|
|
/s/ Raphael Hofstein
|
Director
|
|
|
Raphael Hofstein, Ph.D.
|
February 29, 2012
|
|
|
/s/ Yakov Friedman
|
Director
|
|
|
Yakov Friedman
|
February 29, 2012
|
|
|
/s/ Avraham Molcho
|
Director
|
|
|
Avraham Molcho, M.D.
|
February 29, 2012
|
|
|
/s/ Nurit Benjamini
|
Director
|
|
|
Nurit Benjamini
|
February 29, 2012
|
|
|
/s/ Michael J. Anghel
|
Director
|
|
|
Michael J. Anghel, Ph.D.
|
February 29, 2012
|
|
|
/s/ Isaac Muller
|
Authorized United States Representative
|
|
|
Vcorp Agent Services, Inc.
Isaac Muller, President
|
February 29, 2012
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
Exhibit Number
|
Exhibit Description
|
||
|
2.1
|
Articles of Association of the Registrant, as amended November 17, 2011.
|
||
|
2.2
(2)
|
Form of Deposit Agreement dated as of ____________, 2011 among BioLineRx, Ltd., The Bank of New York Mellon, as Depositary, and all Owners and Holders from time to time of American Depositary Shares issued thereunder.
|
||
|
2.3
(2)
|
Form of American Depositary Receipt; the Form is Exhibit A of the Form of Depositary Agreement.
|
||
|
3.1
(1)
|
Registration Rights Agreement by and among Star Group, Yehuda Zisapel, Jerusalem Development Authority, the Company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., the Pitango Group, the Giza Group, and Hadasit Medical Research Services and Development Ltd. dated January 25, 2007.
|
||
|
4.2
(1)
|
Employment Agreement with Moshe Phillip, M.D., dated January 8, 2004.
|
||
|
4.3
(1)
|
Employment Agreement with Kinneret Savitsky, Ph.D., dated October 13, 2004.
|
||
|
4.5
(1)
|
Employment Agreement with Philip Serlin, dated May 24, 2009.
|
||
|
4.6†
(1)
|
License Agreement entered into as of January 10, 2005, by and between BioLine Innovations Jerusalem L.P. and B.G. Negev Technologies and Applications Ltd.
|
||
|
4.7
(1)
|
Assignment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2009 entered into by and between BioLine Innovations Jerusalem L.P. and BioLineRx Ltd.
|
||
|
4.8†
(1)
|
Research and License Agreement entered into as of April 15, 2004 by and among BioLineRx Ltd., Bar Ilan Research and Development Company Ltd., and Ramot and Tel Aviv University.
|
||
|
4.9
(1)
|
First Amendment, dated as of June 2004, of Research and License Agreement, dated April 15, 2004, by and among the Registrant, Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. and Bar Ilan Research and Development Company Ltd.
|
||
|
4.10
(1)
|
Amendment Agreement dated as of December 20, 2005 entered into by and between the Registrant, Bar Ilan Research and Development Company Ltd. and Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.
|
||
|
4.11
(1)
|
Amendment Agreement dated as of March 7, 2006, entered into by and between the Registrant, Bar Ilan Research and Development Company Ltd. and Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.
|
||
|
4.12†
(1)
|
Assignment Agreement dated as of July 2, 2006 entered into by and between BioLineRx Ltd., Bar Ilan Research and Development Company Ltd., and Ramot and Tel Aviv University.
|
||
|
4.13
(1)
|
Incubator agreement with the Office of the Chief Scientist, January 2005.
|
||
|
4.14
(1)
|
Bridge Loan Agreement with Pan Atlantic Investments Limited dated January 10, 2007.
|
||
|
4.15
(1)
|
Early Development Program Agreement with Pan Atlantic Investments Limited, dated January 10, 2007.
|
||
|
4.16†
(1)
|
License Agreement between Innovative Pharmaceutical Concepts, Inc. and BioLineRx Ltd. dated November 25, 2007.
|
||
|
4.17†
(1)
|
Amended and Restated License and Commercialization Agreement by and among Ikaria Development Subsidiary One LLC and BioLineRx Ltd. and BioLine Innovations Jerusalem L.P. dated August 26, 2009.
|
||
|
4.18
(1)
|
BioLineRx Ltd. 2003 Share Option Plan.
|
||
|
4.19
(1)
|
Lease Agreement between Kaps-Pharma Ltd. and BioLine Innovations Jerusalem L.P., dated July 10, 2005, and Extension to Lease Agreement, dated December 4, 2008.
|
||
|
4.20
(1)
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement with Kinneret Savitsky, Ph.D., dated January 2, 2004.
|
||
|
4.21
(1)
|
Employment Agreement with Leah Klapper, Ph.D., dated January 27, 2005.
|
||
|
4.22
(1)
|
Rights Reacquisition Agreement entered into on May 10, 2011 between Cypress Bioscience, Inc. and BioLineRx Ltd.
|
||
|
4.24†
(1)
|
Amended and Restated License Agreement entered into on June 20, 2010 between Cypress Bioscience, Inc. and BioLineRx Ltd.
|
||
|
4.25†
(1)
|
Payment Date Extension Amendment by and among Ikaria Development Subsidiary One LLC and BioLineRx Ltd. and BioLine Innovations Jerusalem L.P., dated April 21, 2010.
|
||
|
4.26
(1)
|
Amendment to the Amended and Restated license and Commercialization Agreement by and among Ikaria Development Subsidiary One LLC and BioLineRx Ltd. and BioLine Innovations Jerusalem L.P., dated April 21, 2010.
|
||
|
4.27
(1)
|
Extension agreement dated January 2, 2011 to the Incubator Agreement with the Office of the Chief Scientist.
|
||
|
4.28
(1)
|
Sponsored Research Agreement entered into as of June 23, 2011 by and between Yissum Research Development Company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Ltd. and BioLineRx Ltd.
|
||
|
4.29
(1)
|
License Agreement entered into as of June 23, 2011 by and between Yissum Research Development Company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Ltd. and BioLineRx Ltd.
|
||
|
4.30
|
Employment Agreement with David Malek, dated August 8, 2011
|
||
|
4.31
(3)
|
Form of Warrant to purchase American Depositary Shares
|
||
|
5.1
|
Opinion of Yigal Arnon & Co., Israeli counsel to the Registrant
|
||
|
10.1
(3)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement between BioLineRx Ltd. and the Purchasers named therein, dated February 15, 2012
|
||
|
23.1
|
Consent of Kesselman & Kesselman, Certified Public Accountant (Isr.), a member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, independent registered public accounting firm for the Registrant.
|
||
|
23.2
|
Consent of Opinion of Yigal Arnon and Co., Israeli counsel to the Registrant (included in Exhibit 5.1).
|
||
|
†
|
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a confidential treatment request.
|
|
(1)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 20-F (No. 001-35223) filed on July 1, 2011.
|
|
(2)
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 of the Registration Statement on Form F-6 (No. 333-175360) filed by the Bank of New York Mellon with respect to the Registrant’s American Depositary Receipts.
|
|
(3)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 6-K filed on February 15, 2012.
|
II - 2
