¨
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
¨
|
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Title of each class
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Ordinary Shares, par value NIS 0.04 per share
|
Nasdaq Global Select Market
|
Large accelerated filer
x
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
¨
|
U.S. GAAP
x
|
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued
|
Other
¨
|
by the International Accounting Standards Board
¨
|
|
·
|
our ability to respond to new market developments;
|
|
·
|
our intent to penetrate further our existing markets and penetrate new markets;
|
|
·
|
our belief in the sufficiency of our cash flows to meet our needs for the next year;
|
|
·
|
our plans to invest in developing, manufacturing and offering innovative products;
|
|
·
|
our plans to finalize the building of a manufacturing facility with capacity for two production lines in the State of Georgia, United States, with the first production line planned to be operational during the second quarter of 2015 and the second production line planned to be operational in the fourth quarter of 2015;
|
|
·
|
our plans to establish a second manufacturing facility in the State of Georgia and install production lines in addition to the above-referenced two production lines, a process toward which we have already taken initial steps;
|
|
·
|
our plans to invest in the promotion and strengthening of our brand;
|
|
·
|
our plans to invest in research and development for the development of new quartz products;
|
|
·
|
our ability to increase quartz’s penetration in our existing markets and new markets;
|
|
·
|
our ability to successfully compete with other quartz surfaces manufacturers, suppliers and distributors, and with suppliers and distributors of other materials used in countertops;
|
|
·
|
our ability to acquire third-party distributors, manufacturers and raw material suppliers;
|
|
·
|
our plans to continue our international presence;
|
|
·
|
our expectations regarding future prices of quartz, polyester and pigments;
|
|
·
|
future foreign exchange rates, particularly the NIS, Australian dollar, Canadian dollar and the Euro;
|
|
·
|
our expectations regarding our future product mix;
|
|
·
|
our expectations regarding the outcome of litigation or other legal proceedings in which we are involved, and our ability to use our insurance policy to cover damages; and
|
|
·
|
our expectations regarding regulatory matters applicable to us.
|
PART I | 1 | ||
1
|
|||
1
|
|||
1
|
|||
A.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
1
|
|
B.
|
Capitalization and Indebtedness
|
5
|
|
C.
|
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
|
5
|
|
D.
|
Risk Factors
|
5
|
|
29
|
|||
A.
|
History and Development of Caesarstone
|
29
|
|
B.
|
Business Overview
|
30
|
|
C.
|
Organizational Structure
|
40
|
|
D.
|
Property, Plants and Equipment
|
40
|
|
41 | |||
41
|
|||
A.
|
Operating Results
|
41
|
|
B.
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
61
|
|
C.
|
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses
|
61
|
|
D.
|
Trend Information
|
62
|
|
E.
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
|
62
|
|
F.
|
Contractual Obligations
|
63
|
|
63
|
|||
A.
|
Directors and Senior Management
|
67
|
|
B.
|
Compensation of Officers and Directors
|
70
|
|
C.
|
Board Practices
|
83
|
|
D.
|
Employees
|
83
|
|
E.
|
Share Ownership
|
84
|
|
84
|
|||
A.
|
Major Shareholders
|
84
|
|
B.
|
Related Party Transactions
|
86
|
|
C.
|
Interests of Experts and Counsel
|
91
|
|
91
|
|||
A.
|
Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information
|
91
|
|
B.
|
Significant Changes
|
96
|
|
96
|
|||
A.
|
Offer and Listing Details
|
97
|
|
B.
|
Plan of Distribution
|
97
|
|
C.
|
Markets
|
97
|
|
D.
|
Selling Shareholders
|
97
|
|
E.
|
Dilution
|
97
|
|
F.
|
Expenses of the Issue
|
98
|
|
98
|
|||
A.
|
Share Capital
|
98
|
|
B.
|
Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association
|
98
|
|
C.
|
Material Contracts
|
102
|
|
D.
|
Exchange Controls
|
103
|
|
E.
|
Taxation
|
103
|
|
F.
|
Dividends and Paying Agents
|
112
|
|
G.
|
Statements by Experts
|
112
|
|
H.
|
Documents on Display
|
112
|
|
I.
|
Subsidiary Information
|
112
|
|
112
|
|||
114
|
|||
PART II
|
114
|
114
|
|
115
|
|
115
|
|
116
|
|
116
|
116
|
|
116
|
|
117
|
|
117
|
|
117
|
|
117
|
|
118
|
|
PART III
|
118
|
118
|
|
118
|
|
118
|
A.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 447,402 | $ | 356,554 | $ | 296,564 | $ | 259,671 | $ | 198,791 | ||||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
257,751 | 194,436 | 169,169 | 155,377 | 120,503 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
189,651 | 162,118 | 127,395 | 104,294 | 78,288 | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development, net (1)
|
2,628 | 2,002 | 2,100 | 2,487 | 2,273 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing and selling
|
55,870 | 51,209 | 46,911 | 34,043 | 16,048 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
36,111 | 32,904 | 28,423 | 30,018 | 20,896 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
94,609 | 86,115 | 77,434 | 66,548 | 39,217 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
95,042 | 76,003 | 49,961 | 37,746 | 39,071 | |||||||||||||||
Finance expenses, net
|
1,045 | 1,314 | 2,773 | 4,775 | 2,370 | |||||||||||||||
Income before taxes on income
|
93,997 | 74,689 | 47,188 | 32,971 | 36,701 | |||||||||||||||
Taxes on income
|
13,738 | 10,336 | 6,821 | 3,600 | 7,399 | |||||||||||||||
Income after taxes on income
|
80,259 | 64,353 | 40,367 | 29,371 | 29,302 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in losses of affiliate (2)
|
— | — | — | 67 | 296 | |||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 80,259 | $ | 64,353 | $ | 40,367 | $ | 29,304 | $ | 29,006 | ||||||||||
Net income attributable to non-controlling
interest
|
1,820 | 1,009 | 735 | 252 | 348 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to controlling
interest
|
78,439 | 63,344 | 39,632 | 29,052 | 28,658 | |||||||||||||||
Dividend attributable to preferred
shareholders
|
— | — | — | (8,376 | ) | (8,312 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to the Company’s
ordinary shareholders
|
78,439 | 63,344 | 39,632 | 20,676 | 20,346 | |||||||||||||||
Basic net income per ordinary share
|
2.25 | 1.83 | 1.21 | 1.06 | 1.04 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted net income per ordinary share
|
2.22 | 1.80 | 1.21 | 1.06 | 1.04 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average number of ordinary
shares used in computing basic income
per share
|
34,932 | 34,667 | 32,642 | 19,565 | 19,565 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average number of ordinary
shares used in computing diluted income
per share
|
35,394 | 35,210 | 32,700 | 19,565 | 19,565 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends declared per share
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Shekels*
|
NIS |
--
|
NIS |
—
|
NIS |
3.78
|
NIS |
0.50
|
NIS |
2.32
|
||||||||||
Dollars*
|
$ | 0.57 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.02 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.65 |
At December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and short term bank
deposits
|
$ | 54,327 | $ | 92,248 | $ | 72,733 | $ | 11,950 | $ | 43,737 | ||||||||||
Working capital (3)
|
124,306 | 145,702 | 117,712 | 28,592 | 40,201 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
439,000 | 377,556 | 321,049 | 246,317 | 236,403 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
109,274 | 104,333 | 90,026 | 103,661 | 115,450 | |||||||||||||||
Redeemable non-controlling interest
|
8,715 | 7,624 | 7,106 | 6,205 | 5,662 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders’ equity
|
321,011 | 265,599 | 223,917 | 136,451 | 115,291 |
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBIDTA (4)
|
$ | 116,553 | $ | 91,711 | $ | 69,445 | $ | 58,774 | $ | 50,489 | ||||||||||
Adjusted net income attributable to
controlling interest (4)
|
82,498 | 63,959 | 44,008 | 34,765 | 29,763 | |||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
86,373 | 27,372 | 13,481 | 8,785 | 5,486 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
17,176 | 14,994 | 14,368 | 14,615 | 10,034 |
(1)
|
Research and development expenses are presented net of grants that we received from the Office of the Chief Scientist (“OCS”) of the Ministry of Economy of the State of Israel between 2009 and 2013.
|
(2)
|
Reflects our proportionate share of the net loss of our U.S. distributor, Caesarstone USA, Inc. (“Caesarstone USA”), in which we acquired a 25% equity interest on January 29, 2007. We accounted for our investment using the equity method. In 2011, the amount represents a loss through May 18, 2011, the date on which we acquired the remaining 75% equity interest in Caesarstone USA and began to consolidate its results of operations.
|
(3)
|
Working capital is defined as total current assets minus total current liabilities.
|
(4)
|
The following tables reconcile net income to adjusted EBITDA and net income attributable to controlling interest to adjusted net income attributable to controlling interest for the periods presented and are unaudited:
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBIDTA:
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 80,259 | $ | 64,353 | $ | 40,367 | $ | 29,304 | $ | 29,006 | ||||||||||
Finance expenses, net
|
1,045 | 1,314 | 2,773 | 4,775 | 2,370 | |||||||||||||||
Taxes on income
|
13,738 | 10,336 | 6,821 | 3,600 | 7,399 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
17,176 | 14,994 | 14,368 | 14,615 | 10,034 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in losses of affiliate, net(a)
|
— | — | — | 67 | 296 | |||||||||||||||
Excess cost of acquired inventory(b)
|
231 | 188 | 885 | 4,021 | — | |||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense(c)
|
2,642 | 2,514 | 3,007 | 1,259 | 1,384 | |||||||||||||||
Inventory–change of estimate (d)
|
— | (3,458 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Follow–on expenses (e)
|
657 | 1,470 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
IPO bonus(f)
|
— | — | 1,970 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
CaesarStone USA contingent consideration
adjustment(g)
|
— | — | 255 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Litigation gain(h)
|
— | — | (1,001 | ) | (1,783 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Provision for employee fringe benefits (i)
|
939 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Settlement with tax authorities (j)
|
(134 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Microgil loan and inventory write down(k)
|
— | — | — | 2,916 | — | |||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$ | 116,553 | $ | 91,711 | $ | 69,445 | $ | 58,774 | $ | 50,489 |
(a)
|
Consists of our portion of the results of operations of Caesarstone USA prior to its acquisition by us in May 2011.
|
(b)
|
Consists of charges to cost of goods sold for the difference between the higher carrying cost of the inventory of two of our subsidiaries, Caesarstone USA’s inventory at the time of its acquisition and inventory that was purchased from its sub-distributors, and Caesarstone Australia Pty Limited’s inventory that was purchased from its distributor, and the standard cost of our inventory, which adversely impacts our gross margins until such inventory is sold. The majority of the acquired inventory from Caesarstone USA was sold in 2011, and the majority of the inventory purchased from the Australian distributor was sold in 2012.
|
(c)
|
Share-based compensation consists primarily of changes in the value of share-based rights granted in January 2009 to our Chief Executive Officer, as well as changes in the value of share-based rights granted in March 2008 to the former chief executive officer of Caesarstone Australia Pty Limited. In 2012, share-based compensation consisted primarily of expenses related to stock options granted to our employees as well as changes in the value of share-based rights granted in January 2009 to our Chief Executive Officer. In 2013, share-based compensation consisted of expenses related to stock options granted to our employees. In 2014, share-based compensation consists of expenses related to stock options granted to our employees as well as expenses related to share-based bonus rights granted during 2014.
|
(d)
|
Relates to a change in estimate for the value of inventory following the implementation of our new ERP system in April 2013.
|
(e)
|
In 2013, follow-on expenses consist of direct expenses related to a follow-on offering that closed in April 2013, including a bonus paid by our former shareholder, Tene Investment Fund (“Tene”), to certain of our employees that under US GAAP we are required to expense against paid-in capital. In 2014, follow-on expenses consist of direct expenses related to a follow-on offering that closed in June 2014.
|
(f)
|
Consists of the payment of $1.72 million to certain of our employees and $0.25 million to our Chairman for their contribution to the completion of our initial public offering (“IPO”).
|
(g)
|
Relates to the change in fair value of the contingent consideration that was part of the consideration transferred in connection with the acquisition of Caesarstone USA.
|
(h)
|
In 2011, litigation gain consists of a mediation award in our favor pursuant to two trademark infringement cases brought by Caesarstone Australia Pty Limited. In 2012, litigation gain resulted from a settlement agreement with the former chief executive officer of Caesarstone Australia Pty Limited related to litigation that had been commenced in 2010. Pursuant to the settlement, he transferred to us the ownership of all his shares in Caesarstone Australia Pty Limited received in connection with his employment. We did not make any payments in connection with such transfer or other payments to the former chief executive officer. As a result of the settlement, we reversed the liability provision in connection with the litigation and the adjustment is presented net of the related litigation expenses incurred in connection with the settlement.
|
(i)
|
Relates to an adjustment of provision for taxable employee fringe benefits as a result of a settlement with the Israel Tax Authority and with the Israeli National Insurance Institute (“NII”).
|
(j)
|
Relates to a refund of Israeli value added tax (“VAT”) associated with a bad debt from 2007.
|
(k)
|
Relates to our writing down to zero the cost of inventory provided to Microgil Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd. (“Microgil”), our former third-party quartz processor in Israel, in 2011 in the amount of $1.8 million and our writing down to zero our $1.1 million loan to Microgil, in each case, in connection with a dispute. See “ITEM 8: Financial Information—Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal proceedings”.
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interest to Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interest:
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to controlling interest
|
$ | 78,439 | $ | 63,344 | $ | 39,632 | $ | 29,052 | $ | 28,658 | ||||||||||
Excess cost of acquired inventory(a)
|
231 | 188 | 885 | 4,021 | — | |||||||||||||||
Litigation gain(b)
|
— | — | (1,001 | ) | (1,783 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Inventory – change of estimate(c)
|
— | (3,458 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Follow-on expenses(d)
|
657 | 1,470 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
IPO bonus(e)
|
— | — | 1,970 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Caesarstone USA contingent consideration adjustment(f)
|
— | — | 255 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Microgil loan and inventory write down(g)
|
— | — | — | 2,916 | — | |||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense(h)
|
2,642 | 2,514 | 3,007 | 1,259 | 1,384 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for employee fringe benefits (i)
|
939 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Settlement with tax authorities (j)
|
(134 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Tax adjustment (k)
|
342 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total adjustments before tax
|
4,677 | 714 | 5,116 | 6,413 | 1,384 | |||||||||||||||
Less tax on above adjustments
|
618 | 99 | 740 | 700 | 279 | |||||||||||||||
Total adjustments after tax
|
4,059 | 615 | 4,376 | 5,713 | 1,105 | |||||||||||||||
Adjusted net income attributable
to controlling interest
|
$ | 82,498 | $ | 63,959 | $ | 44,008 | $ | 34,765 | $ | 29,763 |
(a)
|
Consists of charges to cost of goods sold for the difference between the higher carrying cost of the inventory of two of our subsidiaries, Caesarstone USA’s inventory at the time of its acquisition and inventory that was purchased from its distributor, and Caesarstone Australia Pty Limited’s inventory that was purchased from its distributor, and the standard cost of our inventory, which adversely impacts our gross margins until such inventory is sold. The majority of the acquired inventory from Caesarstone USA was sold in 2011, and the majority of the inventory purchased from the Australian distributor was sold in 2012.
|
(b)
|
In 2011, litigation gain consists of a mediation award in our favor pursuant to two trademark infringement cases brought by Caesarstone Australia Pty Limited. In 2012, litigation gain resulted from a settlement agreement with the former chief executive officer of Caesarstone Australia Pty Limited related to litigation that had been commenced in 2010. Pursuant to the settlement, he transferred to us the ownership of all his shares in Caesarstone Australia Pty Limited received in connection with his employment. We did not make any payments in connection with such transfer or other payments to the former chief executive officer. As a result of the settlement, we reversed the liability provision in connection with the litigation and the adjustment is presented net of the related litigation expenses incurred in connection with the settlement.
|
(c)
|
Relates to a change in estimate for the value of inventory following the implementation of our new ERP system in April 2013.
|
(d)
|
In 2013, follow-on expenses consist of direct expenses related to a follow-on offering that closed in April 2013, including a bonus paid by our former shareholder, Tene, to certain of our employees that under US GAAP we are required to expense against paid-in capital. In 2014, follow-on expenses consist of direct expenses related to a follow-on offering that closed in June 2014.
|
(e)
|
Consists of the payment of $1.72 million to certain of our employees and $0.25 million to our Chairman for their contribution to the completion of our IPO.
|
(f)
|
Relates to the change in fair value of the contingent consideration that was part of the consideration transferred in connection with the acquisition of Caesarstone USA.
|
(g)
|
Relates to our writing down to zero the cost of inventory provided to Microgil, our former third-party quartz processor in Israel, in 2011 in the amount of $1.8 million and our writing down to zero our $1.1 million loan to Microgil, in each case, in connection with a dispute. See “ITEM 8.A: Financial Information—Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal proceedings.”
|
(h)
|
Share-based compensation consists primarily of changes in the value of share-based rights granted in January 2009 to our Chief Executive Officer, as well as changes in the value of share-based rights granted in March 2008 to the former chief executive officer of Caesarstone Australia Pty Limited. In 2012, share-based compensation consisted primarily of expenses related to stock options granted to our employees as well as changes in the value of share-based rights granted in January 2009 to our Chief Executive Officer. In 2013, share-based compensation consisted of expenses related to stock options granted to our employees. In 2014, share-based compensation consists of expenses related to stock options granted to our employees as well as expenses related to share-based bonus rights granted during 2014.
|
(i)
|
Relates to an adjustment of provision for taxable employee fringe benefits as a result of a settlement with the Israel Tax Authority and with the NII.
|
(j)
|
Relates to a refund of Israeli VAT associated with a bad debt from 2007.
|
(k)
|
Relates to an adjustment in taxes as a result of a tax settlement we reached with Israeli tax authorities.
|
|
·
|
adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income attributable to controlling interest do not reflect our cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
|
|
·
|
adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income attributable to controlling interest do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
|
|
·
|
although depreciation is a non-cash charge, the assets being depreciated will often have to be replaced in the future, and adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and
|
|
·
|
other companies in our industry may calculate adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income attributable to controlling interest differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.
|
B.
|
Capitalization and Indebtedness
|
C.
|
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
|
D.
|
Risk Factors
|
|
·
|
manufacturers of other surface materials or other quartz surface manufacturers successfully brand their products as premium products;
|
|
·
|
consumers place less value on premium branded quartz surfaces;
|
|
·
|
we are unable to develop new product designs based on consumer demand that are supported by new technologies and know-how developed by us;
|
|
·
|
we are unable to respond rapidly or at all to changes in consumers’ preferences, such as in the size of quartz surfaces;
|
|
·
|
we are unable to maintain the strength of the Caesarstone brand and its reputation for high quality, innovation, emphasis on design and excellent service;
|
|
·
|
we are unable to place sufficient inventory to fulfill the demand in the markets;
|
|
·
|
we are unable to complete our additional manufacturing capabilities as planned;
|
|
·
|
new products of similar or better characteristics are marketed by competitors;
|
|
·
|
we are unable to compete with lower-priced products perceived as comparable to ours and produced by manufacturers of other surface materials or other quartz surface manufacturers; or
|
|
·
|
our manufacturing efficiency declines as a result of decreasing capacity and/or increased expenses to meet quality standards in connection with the use of new product development technologies.
|
· |
In November 2011, Kfar Giladi Quarries Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd. (“Kfar Giladi”), and Microgil Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd. (“Microgil”), an entity we believe is controlled by Kfar Giladi, initiated arbitration proceedings against us that commenced in April 2012. We refer to Kfar Giladi and Microgil as the claimants. The claimants filed a complaint with the arbitrator against us seeking damages of NIS 232.8 million ($59.9 million), and in August 2012, we filed a complaint with the arbitrator against the claimants seeking damages of NIS 76.6 million ($19.7 million). The arbitration, which is currently pending, arises out of a dispute related to the quartz processing agreement entered into by us in 2006 (the “Processing Agreement”) pursuant to which Kfar Giladi (which assigned its rights and obligations under the Processing Agreement to Microgil) committed to establish a production facility at its own expense within 21 months of the date of the agreement. Pursuant to the Processing Agreement, we committed to pay fixed prices for quartz processing services related to agreed-upon quantities of quartz over a period of ten years from the date set for the claimants to commence operating the production facility. We estimate that the total amount of such payments would have been approximately $55 million. It is our position that the production facility established by the claimants was not operational until approximately two years after the date required by the Processing Agreement, and as a result, we were unable to purchase minimum quantities set forth in the Processing Agreement. It is also our position that the Processing Agreement was terminated by us following its breach by the claimants. In addition, we contend that once production began, the claimants failed to consistently deliver the required quantity and quality of ground quartz as agreed by the parties following the termination of the Processing Agreement. Our positions are disputed by the claimants.
|
· |
In December 2007, we terminated our agreement in principle with our former South African agent, World of Marble and Granite (“WOMAG”), on the basis that it had breached the agreement. In the same month, we filed a claim for NIS 1.0 million ($0.3 million) in the Israeli District Court in Haifa based on such breach. In January 2008, WOMAG filed suit in South Africa seeking EURO 15.7 million ($19.1 million). In September 2013, the South African Court determined that since a proceeding on the same facts was pending before another court (
lis alibi pendens
), the South African Court will stay the matter until the conclusion of the Israeli action. In December 2013, the magistrate’s court in Israel held that we were not entitled to terminate the agreement with WOMAG as it was not breached by WOMAG. We have filed an appeal to the district court which was dismissed and therefore the case is expected to be heard in the South African Court. It is our position that, as a detailed agreement was not entered into following the agreement in principle, the agreement in principle could be terminated upon reasonable notice, which we believe was provided. Although we intend to vigorously defend the case in the South African court, we believe that we recorded an adequate reserve for this claim.
|
|
·
|
At present, we have presented a plan to the Israeli Ministry of the Protection of the Environment (the “IMPE”) to address environmental regulatory issues related to the emission of styrene gas. While we have applied and continue to apply measures to correct the styrene ambient air standards, our constant controlling of styrene emission levels requires strict maintenance and compliance with work processes, and there is no assurance that we will succeed in complying with the required standards on a continuous basis. For further discussion of the IMPE’s allegations that we exceeded the ambient air standards at our manufacturing facilities in Israel and our subsequent response, see “ITEM 4.B: Information on Caesarstone—Business Overview—Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters—Environmental Regulations—styrene gas emissions.”
|
|
·
|
We are currently implementing measures in order to comply with dust emission environmental and occupational health standards. There is no assurance that we will be successful in employing these measures, and an ultimate failure to comply could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
|
|
·
|
We are reviewing certain aspects of new standards adopted by the IMPE with respect to classification of sludge waste and its disposal, which impose on us higher disposal costs. We are in the process of discussing this matter with the IMPE, with the aim of obtaining its agreement that no change in our sludge-waste classification is required or that our sludge can be otherwise used for certain applications, in a manner that will reduce its disposal costs. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful in such discussions. For a discussion of the IMPE’s 2013 analysis of our sludge waste disposal, see “ITEM 4.B: Information on Caesarstone—Business Overview—Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters—Environmental Regulations—sludge waste disposal.”
|
|
·
|
With respect to waste water treatment, we currently dispose of our waste water from our Bar-Lev manufacturing facility in a treatment plant pursuant to a permit obtained from the IMPE that was recently extended until December 31, 2015. We currently dispose of wastewater at our Sdot-Yam manufacturing facility pursuant to a permit obtained from the IMPE that is valid until December 31, 2016. Furthermore, in October 2014 we obtained an additional special permit, which allows us to dispose our wastewater deriving from both our manufacturing facilities into an alternative disposal facility, which may be used according to our needs. If any of these permits is not renewed, we will have to find an alternative solution to waste water disposal at some or all of our facilities in Israel, and the accompanying increase in costs may have adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
|
·
|
fluctuations in exchange rates;
|
·
|
fluctuations in land and sea transportation costs, as well as delays in transportation and other time-to-market delays, including as a result of strikes;
|
·
|
unpredictability of foreign currency exchange controls;
|
·
|
compliance with unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
|
·
|
compliance with a variety of regulations and laws in each of the jurisdictions we operate or where our products are sold;
|
·
·
|
difficulties in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods;
changes in tax laws and interpretation of those laws; and
|
·
|
difficulties enforcing intellectual property and contractual rights in certain jurisdictions.
|
·
|
a majority of the shares held by shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction and are voting at the meeting must be voted in favor of approving the transaction, excluding abstentions; or
|
·
|
the shares voted by shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction who vote against the transaction represent no more than two percent (2%) of the voting rights in the company.
|
·
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our results of operations;
|
·
|
variance in our financial performance from the expectations of market analysts;
|
·
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant business developments, changes in distributor relationships, acquisitions or expansion plans;
|
·
|
changes in the prices of our raw materials or the products we sell;
|
·
|
our involvement in litigation;
|
·
|
our sale of ordinary shares or other securities in the future;
|
·
|
market conditions in our industry;
|
·
|
changes in key personnel;
|
·
|
the trading volume of our ordinary shares;
|
·
|
changes in the estimation of the future size and growth rate of our markets; and
|
·
|
general economic and market conditions.
|
·
|
the composition of our board of directors (other than external directors);
|
·
|
approving or rejecting a merger, consolidation or other business combination; and
|
·
|
amending our articles of association, which govern the rights attached to our ordinary shares.
|
A.
|
History and Development of Caesarstone
|
B.
|
Business Overview
|
2014 Global Countertop Demand | 2014 Global Countertop Demand by Material |
For the year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
Region
|
2014
|
2012
|
2010
|
|||||||||
United States
|
8 | % | 6 | % | 5 | % | ||||||
Australia
|
39 | % | 35 | % | 32 | % | ||||||
Canada
|
18 | % | 12 | % | 9 | % | ||||||
Israel
|
86 | % | 85 | % | 82 | % |
|
·
|
Sludge waste disposal
|
|
o
|
In January 2010, the IMPE ordered us to remove sludge waste that was disposed of in 2009 in a number of locations in northern Israel claiming that such disposal was unlawful. We have engaged in discussions with the IMPE with respect to which sites will require waste removal. We performed a feasible and practical clean-up project but have yet to receive any acknowledgement by the IMPE that no further actions are necessary in relation with such sludge.
|
|
o
|
In April 2013, the IMPE analyzed our sludge waste and alleged that such sludge waste, which had been classified as construction waste, should be reclassified as hazardous waste due to several ingredients included therein. After reexamining our sludge, the IMPE decided in May 2014 to classify our sludge as solid industrial waste. Such reclassification results in the need to dispose the waste at different disposal sites, which involves much higher expenses compared to our previous disposal costs. We are in the process of discussing this matter with the IMPE, with the aim of obtaining its agreement that no change in our sludge-waste classification is required or that our sludge can be otherwise used for certain applications, in a manner that will reduce its disposal costs; however, there is no assurance that we will be successful in such discussions. As of December 31, 2014, we had reserves of approximately $0.7 million, which we believe to be adequate for anticipated future clean-up expenditures if required by the IMPE.
|
|
·
|
Styrene gas emissions.
The IMPE has required us to comply with the applicable obligations under the law and regulations related to styrene gas emission at both of our manufacturing facilities in Israel. In December 2013, we completed the installation of a system in our Bar-Lev manufacturing facility to reduce styrene emission, which has provided us better control of the styrene emission in our Bar-Lev manufacturing facility. We subsequently presented to IMPE a plan to further improve our control of styrene emission and comply with the styrene gas emission standards. With respect to our Sdot-Yam manufacturing facility, we were summoned before the IMPE for a January 2014 hearing, which addressed allegations that, based on the IMPE’s gas samplings, we exceeded the ambient air standards. Although the IMPE acknowledged that we were in the process of installing measures to comply with the styrene gas emission standards, the IMPE recommended an investigation to look into the allegation that we exceeded the styrene ambient air standard for styrene during 2013. If we fail to comply with the styrene emission standard in our Bar-Lev manufacturing facility, our business license for this facility may not be renewed following June 30, 2015.We applied measures to correct the styrene ambient air standards throughout 2014 at our Sdot-Yam manufacturing facility, and, in November 2014, we installed a new system which we believe should help to remediate the excess emission of styrene gas. Our constant controlling of styrene emission levels requires strict maintenance and compliance with work processes, and there is no assurance that we will succeed in complying with the required standards on a continuous basis.
|
|
·
|
Waste water disposal.
We currently dispose of our waste water from our Bar-Lev manufacturing facility in a treatment plant pursuant to a permit obtained from the IMPE that was recently extended until December 31, 2015. In addition, we currently dispose of waste water at our Sdot-Yam manufacturing facility pursuant to a permit obtained from the IMPE that is valid until December 31, 2016. Furthermore in October 2014, we obtained an additional special permit, which allows us to dispose our waste water deriving from both our manufacturing facilities into an alternative disposal facility, which may be used according to our needs.
|
|
·
|
Dust emissions.
With respect to dust emissions both into the environment and inside our manufacturing facilities in Israel, we are implementing measures in order to achieve compliance with dust emission environmental standards and meet the health and safety standards with respect to permissible exposure limits.
|
|
·
|
Fire protection measures.
In May 2011, we received a letter from the Israeli fire regulation authorities detailing fire protection measures required at our facility in Kibbutz Sdot-Yam to obtain the necessary fire regulatory approval for such facility. We have established a program with the fire regulation authorities to adjust our fire protection measures to comply with their requirements and we are implementing the measures in accordance with such program. In December 2014, we received the fire regulation authorities’ approval as required to obtain a business license, which is subject to our implementation of the required fire protection measures through December 2015.
|
C.
|
Organizational Structure
|
D.
|
Property, Plants and Equipment
|
Properties
|
Owner’s rights
|
Location
|
Purpose
|
Size
|
Kibbutz Sdot-Yam(1)
|
Short-Term Renewing Lease
|
Caesarea, Central Israel
|
Headquarters, manufacturing facility, research and development center
|
31,644 square meters of facility and 64,207 square meters of un-covered yard**
|
Bar-Lev Industrial Park manufacturing facility (2)
|
98-Year Lease
|
Carmiel, Northern Israel
|
Manufacturing facility
|
22,137 square meters of facility and 40,461 square meters of un-covered yard*
|
Bar-Lev Industrial Park warehouse (3)
|
N/A
|
Carmiel, Northern Israel
|
Storage
|
1,900 square meters of un-covered yard
|
Bar-Lev Industrial Park warehouse (4)
|
N/A
|
Carmiel, Northern Israel
|
Storage
|
700 square meters of un-covered yard
|
Belfast Industrial Center(5)
|
Ownership
|
Richmond Hill, Georgia,
United States
|
Manufacturing facility under construction
|
26,400 square meters of facility and 159,351 square meters of un-covered yard
|
|
(1)
|
Leased pursuant to a land use agreement with Kibbutz Sdot-Yam entered into in March 2012 with a term of 20 years, which replaced the former land use agreement. Starting from September 2014 we use an additional 9,000 square meters pursuant to Kibbutz Sdot-Yam’s consent under the same terms as the land use agreement. However, we have the right to return these premises to Kibbutz Sdot Yam at any time upon 90 days’ prior written notice. We are currently negotiating the terms of a written addendum to the land lease agreement. The lands on which these facilities are located are held by the ILA and leased or subleased by Kibbutz Sdot-Yam pursuant to the following agreements: (i) a lease from the ILA signed in July 1978 that commenced in 1962 and expired in 2011 and has been extended pursuant to an option in the lease agreement for an additional 49 years through 2060; (ii) a lease from the ILA to Kibbutz Sdot-Yam that expired in 2009 (Kibbutz Sdot-Yam is currently negotiating a long-term lease agreement with the ILA to replace this agreement) and (iii) a lease entered into between Kibbutz Sdot-Yam and the Caesarea Development Corporation in April 2014 pursuant to which the Kibbutz leases the relevant premises (including such premises leased by the Kibbutz to us) from the Caesarea Development Corporation until the year 2037. In the case of the third lease mentioned above, the agreement is subject to public recording procedure. To date, the expirations of the first and second lease agreements referred to above have not had any impact on our ability to use the facilities located on the property subject to the leases and we do not currently believe that they will have a material impact in the future pending completion of the negotiations for the lease extension or new long-term lease, respectively. See “ITEM 7.B: Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Relationship and agreements with Kibbutz Sdot-Yam—Land use agreement."
|
|
(2)
|
Leased pursuant to a long-term lease agreement with the ILA entered into on June 6, 2007 to use the premises for an initial period of 49 years as of February 6, 2005, with an option to renew for an additional term of 49 years as of the end of the initial period. Pursuant to the land purchase and leaseback agreement signed on March 31, 2011, effective as of September 1, 2012, between Kibbutz Sdot-Yam and us, we have agreed that Kibbutz Sdot-Yam will acquire from us our rights in the lands and facilities of the Bar-Lev manufacturing facility in consideration for NIS 43.7 million ($10.9 million). The land purchase agreement was simultaneously executed with a land use agreement pursuant to which Kibbutz Sdot-Yam permits us to use the Bar-Lev Grounds for a period of ten years with an automatic renewal for an additional ten years unless we notify Kibbutz Sdot-Yam that we do not wish to renew at least two years before the termination of the initial ten-year period. Pursuant to the Agreement For Arranging For Additional Accord, we have entered into the Agreement For Additional Land, pursuant to which Kibbutz Sdot-Yam acquired additional land on the grounds near our Bar-Lev manufacturing facility, which we required for the extension of our Bar-Lev manufacturing facility in connection with the construction of the fifth production line and leased it to us at market value. Once the warehouse is fully constructed, we will lease the additional land and warehouse from Kibbutz Sdot-Yam. For more information, see “ITEM 7.B: Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Relationship and agreements with Kibbutz Sdot-Yam—Land purchase agreement and leaseback.”
|
|
(3)
|
On September 11, 2013, we entered into a lease agreement to use the premises near our Bar-Lev manufacturing facility solely for the purpose of storing quartz slabs manufactured by us for an initial period of 12 months, with an option to renew the lease for an additional two periods of 12 months each. We continued to use these premises and increased the leased area up to a total of 1,900 square meters for storing quartz slabs manufactured by us. The extended term of such lease is yet to be finalized. However, the Company may terminate the lease at any time by providing 30 days’ prior notice.
|
|
(4)
|
On September 17, 2013, we entered into a purchase agreement for the purchase of approximately 46 acres of land in Richmond Hill, the State of Georgia, United States, comprising approximately 36.9 acres of upland and approximately 9 acres of wetland for our new U.S. manufacturing facility which is currently under construction. According to the purchase agreement, we have an option to purchase additional land situated adjacent to the purchased land encompassing approximately 19.4 acres of land, comprised of approximately 17.9 acres of upland and approximately 1.5 acres of wetland. We are currently discussing the exercise of such option.
|
|
(5)
|
In December 2014, we entered into a bond purchase loan agreement and were issued a taxable revenue bond on December 1, 2014, and executed a corresponding lease agreement, pursuant to which the Development Authority of Bryan County, an instrumentality of the State of Georgia and a public corporation (“DABC”), has acquired legal title of our facility in Richmond Hill, in the State of Georgia, USA, and in consideration leased such facilities back to us. In addition, the facility was pledged by DABC in favor of us and DABC has committed to re-convey title to the facility to us upon the maturity of the bond or at any time at our request, upon our payment of $100 to DABC. Therefore, we consider such facilities to be owned by us. This arrangement was structured to grant us property tax abatement for ten years at 100% and additional five years at 50%, subject to our satisfying certain qualifying conditions with respect to headcount, average salaries paid to our employees and the total capital investment amount in our U.S plant. For a discussion of our ongoing expansion of this facility, including its financing and its related expenses, see “ITEM 4.A: Information on Caesarstone—History and Development of Caesarstone—Principal Capital Expenditures” and “ITEM 3.D: Key Information—Risk Factors—We are working to increase our production capacity for our quartz surface products in the United States in order to meet anticipated demand through expanding our manufacturing facilities.”
|
A.
|
Operating Results
|
·
|
Our sales are impacted by home renovation and remodeling and new residential, and to a lesser extent, commercial and construction spending trends. We estimate that approximately 60% of our revenue is related to renovation and remodeling activities in the United States, Australia and Canada, while 25% to 35% is related to housing starts. Spending in each of these sectors declined significantly in 2009 compared to 2008 in most of the markets in which we operate and, to date, many of these markets, including Europe, the United States, Australia and Canada, did not recover or recovered only to a certain degree. U.S. housing starts recovered, growing 81.6% from 2009 to 2014 but are still 25.5% below levels from 2007. Home renovation and remodeling spending is estimated to recover by 21.4% from its recent bottom in 2010 but is still 4.8% below its 2007 level according to the Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University. In Australia, housing starts recovered completely from their 2009 low and reached a new peak after increasing 24.3% from July 2012 to July 2014, reversing an aggregate 16.3% decrease between July 2010 and June 2012. Home renovation and remodeling spending in Australia, however, were estimated to grow by only 0.3% from July 2013 to June 2014 and are still 8.5% below their 2008 peak. Housing starts in Canada were estimated to grow by only 0.7% in 2014 and are still 17.1% below 2007 level. Home renovation and remodeling spending in Canada is estimated to have grown 3.5% in 2014, but in that period was still approximately 12% below its 2007 peak, according to Scotiabank. Despite the 2007 to 2009 global downturn, prevailing weak economic conditions in Europe and mixed economic conditions in the United States, Australia and Canada as described above, we experienced compound annual revenue growth of 19.2% between 2007 and 2014 through increased penetration of quartz in kitchen countertop applications, market share gains in some of our key markets, and an increase in average selling prices associated with our establishment of new direct distribution channels and the expansion of our differentiated product offering. In 2013, our revenue increased in all regions, with the most significant growth in sales in the United States, growing by over 40% leveraging our increased distribution footprint, the successful introduction of the super natural collection, supported by a positive housing market. In 2014, our revenues increased in all regions except Israel. The most significant growth in sales occurred in the United States, where revenues increased by 50.4%, in part due to the continued quartz recognition, the collaboration with IKEA, improved product offerings, and a positive-trending housing market. Significant growth was achieved also in Australia and Canada, which grew 27.4% and 26.2%, respectively, on a constant currency basis.
|
·
|
Our gross profit margins have improved significantly over recent years, with 42.4% margin in 2014, compared to 45.5% in 2013, 43.0% in 2012, and 40.2% in 2011. The primary reasons for these gross profit margin improvements from 2011 to 2014 were the improved product offerings associated with the introduction of our super natural products and the impact of scale benefits. In 2014, gross profit margins decreased mainly due to unfavorable exchange rates, increased IKEA business related to fabrication and installation activities, which comes with lower gross margin and a non-recurring $3.5 million credit to cost of revenues from 2013.
|
·
|
Our operating income margins were 16.8% in 2012, 21.3% in 2013, and 21.2% in 2014. The increase from 2012 to 2014 resulted primarily from economies of scale benefits on operating expenses that we started to leverage in 2013, mainly in the United States and Canada. Operating income margins remained substantially the same in 2014, but grew by 90 basis points excluding the 2013 non-recurring credit mentioned above. The improvement in operating income margin each year was achieved despite a significant negative impact from exchange rate fluctuations.
|
·
|
In 2005, we commenced operations with a third manufacturing line at a new manufacturing facility in the Bar-Lev Industrial Park in northern Israel. We subsequently established a fourth production line in 2007 with the addition of a second production line at our Bar-Lev manufacturing facility. The operation of the fifth production line in the Bar-Lev manufacturing facility included two phases and was completed in the second quarter of 2014. The first production line in the new U.S. facility is planned to be operational in the second quarter of 2015 and the second production line is planned to be operational in the fourth quarter of 2015. Our investments related to the fifth production line at our Bar-Lev manufacturing facility was $24 million and the investment related to the production capacity increase in the United States is estimated to be approximately $115 million.
|
·
|
As an increasing portion of our products are sold through direct channels, our revenues and results of operations exhibit some quarterly fluctuations as a result of seasonal influences which impact construction and renovation cycles. Due to the fact that certain of our operating costs are fixed, the impact on our adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and net income of a change in revenues is magnified. We believe that the third quarter tends to exhibit higher sales volumes than other quarters because demand for quartz surface products is generally higher during the summer months in the northern hemisphere with the effort to complete new construction and renovation projects before the new school year. Conversely, the first quarter is impacted by the winter slowdown in the northern hemisphere in the construction industry and depending on the date of the spring holiday in Israel in a particular year, the first or second quarter is impacted by a reduction in sales in Israel due to such holiday. Similarly, sales in Australia during the first quarter are negatively impacted by fewer construction and renovation projects. The fourth quarter is susceptible to being impacted from the onset of winter in the northern hemisphere.
|
·
|
We conduct business in multiple countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Australia and the Middle East and as a result, we are exposed to risks associated with fluctuations in currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and certain other currencies in which we conduct business. A significant portion of our revenues is generated in U.S. and Australian dollars, and to a lesser extent the Canadian dollar, the euro and the new Israeli shekel. In 2014, 43.3% of our revenues were denominated in U.S. dollars, 24.0% in Australian dollars, 12.9% in Canadian dollars, 10.5% in euros and 9.2% in NIS. As a result, devaluations of the Australian dollars, and to a lesser extent, the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar may unfavorably impact our profitability. Our expenses are largely denominated in U.S. dollars, NIS and euro, with a smaller portion in the Australian dollars and Canadian dollars. As a result, appreciation of the NIS, and to a lesser extent, the euro relative to the U.S. dollar may unfavorably impact our profitability. We attempt to limit our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations through forward and option contracts, which, except for USD/NIS forward contracts, are not designated as hedging accounting instruments under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (originally issued as SFAS 133). As of December 31, 2014, we had outstanding contracts with a notional amount of $98.6. These transactions were for a period of up to 12 months. The fair value of these foreign currency derivative contracts was $(0.4) million, which is included in current assets and current liabilities, at December 31, 2014. For further discussion of our foreign currency derivative contracts, see “ITEM 11: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
|
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Geographical Region
|
% total revenues
|
Revenues in thousands of USD
|
% of revenues
|
Revenues in thousands of USD
|
% total revenues
|
Revenues in thousands of USD
|
||||||||||||||||||
United States
|
41.5 | % | $ | 185,583 | 34.6 | % | $ | 123,399 | 29.2 | % | $ | 86,759 | ||||||||||||
Australia
|
24.0 | 107,539 | 25.2 | 89,894 | 30.0 | 88,935 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canada
|
12.9 | 57,898 | 13.8 | 49,214 | 13.6 | 40,322 | ||||||||||||||||||
Israel
|
9.2 | 41,286 | 11.8 | 42,024 | 12.3 | 36,373 | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe
|
5.2 | 23,109 | 6.4 | 22,973 | 7.0 | 20,749 | ||||||||||||||||||
Rest of world
|
7.2 | 31,987 | 8.2 | 29,050 | 7.9 | 23,426 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
100.0 | % | 447,402 | 100.0 | % | 356,554 | 100.0 | % | 296,564 |
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
% of Revenue
|
Amount
|
% of Revenue
|
Amount
|
% of Revenue
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Income Statement Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues:
|
$ | 447,402 | 100.0 | % | $ | 356,554 | 100.0 | % | $ | 296,564 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
257,751 | 57.6 | 194,436 | 54.5 | 169,169 | 57.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
189,651 | 42.4 | 162,118 | 45.5 | 127,395 | 43.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development,
net(1)
|
2,628 | 0.6 | 2,002 | 0.6 | 2,100 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Marketing and selling
|
55,870 | 12.5 | 51,209 | 14.4 | 46,911 | 15.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
36,111 | 8.1 | 32,904 | 9.2 | 28,423 | 9.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
94,609 | 21.2 | 86,115 | 24.2 | 77,434 | 26.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
95,042 | 21.2 | 76,003 | 21.3 | 49,961 | 16.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Finance expenses, net
|
1,045 | 0.2 | 1,314 | 0.4 | 2,773 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income before taxes on income
|
93,997 | 21.0 | 74,689 | 20.9 | 47,188 | 15.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Taxes on income
|
13,738 | 3.1 | 10,336 | 2.9 | 6,821 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income after taxes on income
|
80,259 | 17.9 | 64,353 | 18.0 | 40,367 | 13.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 80,259 | 17.9 | % | $ | 64,353 | 18.0 | % | $ | 40,367 | 13.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest
|
1,820 | 0.4 | 1,009 | 0.2 | 735 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to controlling interest
|
$ | 78,439 | 17.5 | % | $ | 63,344 | 17.8 | % | $ | 39,632 | 13.4 | % |
Three months ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, 2014
|
Sept. 30, 2014
|
June 30, 2014
|
Mar. 31, 2014
|
Dec. 31, 2013
|
Sept. 30, 2013
|
June 30, 2013
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Income Statement Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues:
|
$ | 113,640 | $ | 123,284 | $ | 116,064 | $ | 94,414 | $ | 96,813 | $ | 94,320 | $ | 88,977 | $ | 76,444 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues as a percentage of annual revenue
|
25.4 | % | 27.6 | % | 25.9 | % | 21.1 | % | 27.2 | % | 26.5 | % | 25.0 | % | 21.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
$ | 48,916 | $ | 53,926 | $ | 47,622 | $ | 39,187 | $ | 41,583 | $ | 41,998 | $ | 44,320 | $ | 34,217 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
22,990 | 31,228 | 23,557 | 17,267 | 19,773 | 20,917 | 22,242 | 13,071 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
20,591 | 27,419 | 18,776 | 13,473 | 17,017 | 16,461 | 20,165 | 10,710 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other financial data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBIDTA
|
$ | 28,126 | $ | 35,937 | $ | 30,361 | $ | 22,130 | $ | 24,216 | $ | 25,231 | $ | 24,621 | $ | 17,643 | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBIDTA as
a percentage of
annual adjusted
EBIDTA
|
24.1 | % | 30.8 | % | 26.1 | % | 19.0 | % | 26.4 | % | 27.5 | % | 26.8 | % | 19.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted net income
attributable to
controlling interest
|
$ | 21,023 | $ | 26,968 | $ | 20,708 | $ | 13,800 | $ | 17,479 | $ | 16,545 | $ | 18,620 | $ | 11,315 | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted net income
attributable to
controlling interest as
a percentage of annual
adjusted net income
|
25.5 | % | 32.7 | % | 25.1 | % | 16.7 | % | 27.3 | % | 25.9 | % | 29.1 | % | 17.7 | % |
Three months ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, 2014
|
Sept. 30, 2014
|
June 30, 2014
|
Mar. 31, 2014
|
Dec. 31, 2013
|
Sept. 30, 2013
|
June 30, 2013
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(as a % of revenue)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Income
Statement Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues:
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
43.0 | 43.7 | 41.0 | 41.5 | 43.0 | 44.5 | 49.8 | 44.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
20.2 | 25.3 | 20.3 | 18.3 | 20.4 | 22.2 | 25.0 | 17.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
18.0 | 21.5 | 15.7 | 14.1 | 17.6 | 17.4 | 22.6 | 14.0 |
Three months ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, 2014
|
Sept. 30, 2014
|
June 30, 2014
|
Mar. 31, 2014
|
Dec. 31, 2013
|
Sept. 30, 2013
|
June 30, 2013
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 20,591 | $ | 27,419 | $ | 18,776 | $ | 13,473 | $ | 17,017 | $ | 16,461 | $ | 20,165 | $ | 10,710 | ||||||||||||||||
Finance expenses (income), net
|
(911 | ) | (1,029 | ) | 1,420 | 1,565 | 416 | 1,113 | (404 | ) | 189 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Taxes on income
|
3,310 | 4,838 | 3,361 | 2,229 | 2,340 | 3,343 | 2,481 | 2,172 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
4,436 | 4,196 | 4,299 | 4,245 | 3,894 | 3,803 | 3,684 | 3,613 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess cost
of acquired inventory(a)
|
— | 123 | 108 | — | 15 | 31 | 72 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation expense (b)
|
700 | 524 | 801 | 618 | 534 | 480 | 611 | 889 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inventory - change of estimate (c)
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | (3,458 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Follow-on expense(d)
|
— | — | 657 | — | — | — | 1,470 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable employees fringe benefits settlement (e)
|
— | — | 939 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement with
the tax authorities (f)
|
— | (134 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$ | 28,126 | $ | 35,937 | $ | 30,361 | $ | 22,130 | $ | 24,216 | $ | 25,231 | $ | 24,621 | $ | 17,643 |
(a)
|
Consists of charges to cost of goods sold for the difference between the higher carrying cost of the inventory of two of our subsidiaries, Caesarstone USA’s inventory at the time of its acquisition and inventory that was purchased from its sub-distributors, and Caesarstone Australia Pty Limited’s inventory that was purchased from its distributor, and the standard cost of our inventory, which adversely impacts our gross margins until such inventory is sold. The majority of the acquired inventory from Caesarstone USA was sold in 2011, and the majority of the inventory purchased from the Australian distributor was sold in 2012.
|
(b)
|
In 2013, share-based compensation consisted of expenses related to stock options granted to our employees. In 2014, share-based compensation consisted primarily of expenses related to stock options granted to our employees as well as expenses related to Share based rights granted during 2014.
|
(c)
|
Relates to a change in estimate for the value of inventory following the implementation of our new ERP system in April 2013.
|
(d)
|
In 2014, follow-on offering expenses consist of direct expenses related to a follow-on offering that closed in April 2013, including a bonus paid by our former shareholder, Tene to certain of our employees that under US GAAP we are required to expense against paid-in capital. In 2014, follow-on offering expenses consist of direct expenses related to a follow-on offering that closed in June 2014.
|
(e)
|
Relates to an adjustment of provision for taxable employee fringe benefits as a result of a settlement with the Israel Tax Authority and with the NII.
|
(f)
|
Relates to a refund of Israeli VAT associated with a bad debt from 2007.
|
Three months ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, 2014
|
Sept. 30, 2014
|
June 30, 2014
|
Mar. 31, 2014
|
Dec. 31, 2013
|
Sept. 30, 2013
|
June 30, 2013
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interest to Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interest:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to
controlling interest
|
$ | 20,418 | $ | 26,545 | $ | 18,206 | $ | 13,270 | $ | 17,005 | $ | 16,103 | $ | 19,718 | $ | 10,518 | ||||||||||||||||
Excess of acquired inventory(a)
|
— | 123 | 108 | — | 15 | 31 | 72 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation
expense(b)
|
700 | 524 | 801 | 618 | 534 | 480 | 611 | 889 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inventory – Change of
estimate(c)
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | (3,458 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Follow-on expenses(d)
|
— | — | 657 | — | — | — | 1,470 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for employees fringe
benefits(e)
|
— | — | 939 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement with
the tax authorities(f)
|
(134 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax adjustment(g)
|
— | — | 342 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total adjustments before tax
|
700 | 513 | 2,847 | 618 | 549 | 511 | (1,305 | ) | 959 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Less tax on above adjustments
|
95 | 90 | 345 | 88 | 75 | 69 | (207 | ) | 162 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total adjustments after tax
|
605 | 423 | 2,502 | 530 | 474 | 442 | (1,098 | ) | 797 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted net income attributable
to controlling interest
|
21,023 | 26,968 | 20,708 | 13,800 | 17,479 | 16,545 | 18,620 | 11,315 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted net income
attributable to the
Company’s ordinary
Shareholders
|
$ | 21,023 | $ | 26,968 | $ | 20,708 | $ | 13,800 | $ | 17,479 | $ | 16,545 | $ | 18,620 | $ | 11,315 | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted diluted EPS
|
$ | 0.59 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.32 |
(a)
|
Consists of charges to cost of goods sold for the difference between the higher carrying cost of the inventory of two of our
subsidiaries, Caesarstone USA’s inventory at the time of its acquisition and inventory that was purchased from its distributor, and Caesarstone Australia Pty Limited’s inventory that was purchased from its distributor, and the standard cost of our inventory, which adversely impacts our gross margins until such inventory is sold. The majority of the acquired inventory from Caesarstone USA was sold in 2011, and the majority of the inventory purchased from the Australian distributor was sold in 2012.
|
(b)
|
In 2014, share-based compensation consisted primarily of expenses related to stock options granted to our employees as well as expenses related to Share based rights granted during 2014.
|
(c)
|
Relates to a change in estimate for the value of inventory following the implementation of our new ERP system in April 2013.
|
(d)
|
In 2013, follow-on offering expenses consists of direct expenses related to a follow on-offering that closed in April 2013, including a bonus paid by ours former shareholder, Tene, to certain of our employees that under US GAAP we are required to expense against paid-in capital. In 2014, follow-on offering expenses consist of direct expenses related to a follow-on offering that closed in June 2014.
|
(e)
|
Relates to an adjustment of provision for taxable employee fringe benefits as a result of a settlement with the Israel Tax Authority and with the Israeli NII.
|
(f)
|
Relates to a refund of Israeli VAT associated with a bad debt from 2007.
|
(g)
|
Relates to an adjustment in taxes as a result of a tax settlement we reached with Israeli tax authorities.
|
December 31, 2014
|
||||
Dividend yield
|
0.0 | % | ||
Expected volatility
|
45.0 | % | ||
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.9 | % | ||
Expected life (in years)
|
6.3 |
B.
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
As of December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$ | 76,024 | $ | 75,670 | $ | 35,270 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(27,726 | ) | (54,077 | ) | (58,180 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities
|
(26,671 | ) | (26,424 | ) | 42,480 |
C.
|
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses
|
D.
|
Trend Information
|
E.
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
|
F.
|
Contractual Obligations
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020 and thereafter
|
Other
|
Total (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale-leaseback
|
$ | 1,092 | $ | 1,092 | $ | 1,092 | $ | 1,092 | $ | 1,092 | $ | 3,002 | — | $ | 8,462 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations
|
10,395 | 8,737 | 7,442 | 6,133 | 5,373 | $ | 47,683 | — | 85,763 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations(1)
|
27,062 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 27,062 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued severance pay, net(2)
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | 473 | 473 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Uncertain tax positions(3)
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | 417 | 417 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities(4)
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | 6,885 | 6,885 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 38,549 | $ | 9,829 | $ | 8,534 | $ | 7,225 | $ | 6,465 | $ | 50,685 | $ | 7,775 | $ | 129,062 |
|
(1)
|
Consists of enforceable and legally binding purchase obligations to suppliers. Does not include purchase obligations to Microgil, our former third-party quartz processor in Israel, based on a quartz processing agreement entered into between us and Kfar Giladi that was subsequently assigned to Microgil, an entity that we believe is controlled by Kfar Giladi. It is our position that the production facility established by Kfar Giladi and Microgil was not operational until approximately two years after the date required by the Processing Agreement, and as a result, we were unable to purchase minimum quantities set forth in the Processing Agreement. It is also our position, which is disputed by Kfar Giladi and Microgil, that the Processing Agreement was terminated by us following its breach by Kfar Giladi and Microgil. See “ITEM 8.A: Financial Information—Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal proceedings.”
|
|
(2)
|
Severance pay relates to accrued severance obligations to our Israeli employees as required under Israeli labor law. These obligations are payable only upon termination, retirement or death of the relevant employee and there is no obligation if the employee voluntarily resigns. See also Note 2q to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for further information regarding accrued severance pay.
|
|
(3)
|
Uncertain income tax positions under ASC 740 (formerly FIN 48) guidelines for accounting for uncertain tax positions are due upon settlement and we are unable to reasonably estimate the ultimate amounts or timing of settlement. See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for further information regarding our liability under ASC 740.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes other long-term balance sheet liabilities.
|
A.
|
Directors and Senior Management
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Officers
|
||
Yosef Shiran
|
52
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Yair Averbuch
|
54
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
David Cullen
|
55
|
Chief Executive Officer Caesarstone Australia
|
Sagi Cohen
|
45
|
Chief Executive Officer Caesarstone USA
|
Giora Wegman
|
63
|
Deputy Chief Executive Officer
|
Michal Baumwald Oron
|
41
|
Vice President Business Development and General Counsel
|
Eli Feiglin
|
47
|
Vice President Marketing
|
Erez Schweppe
|
50
|
Vice President Sales
|
HaHHarel Boker
|
65
|
Vice President of Operations
|
Tzvika Rimon
|
63
|
Israel Country Manager
|
Erez Margalit
|
47
|
Vice President Research and Development
|
Lilach Gilboa
|
42
|
Vice President Human Resources
|
Directors
|
||
Maxim Ohana
|
64
|
Chairman
|
Yonatan Melamed(1)(4)
|
71
|
Director
|
Moshe Ronen(2)(3)(4)
|
64
|
Director
|
Shachar Degani
|
48
|
Director
|
Irit Ben-Dov (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
|
44
|
Director
|
Ofer Borovsky (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
|
60
|
Director
|
Ram Belinkov(4)
|
59
|
Director
|
Avner Naveh
|
65
|
Director
|
Ofer Tsimchi(4)
|
55
|
Director
|
Or Gilboa
|
37
|
Director
|
Amihai Beer
|
34
|
Director
|
|
(1)
|
Member of our audit committee.
|
|
(2)
|
Member of our compensation committee.
|
|
(3)
|
Member of our nominating committee.
|
|
(4)
|
Independent under the Nasdaq rules.
|
|
(5)
|
External director under the Israeli Companies Law.
|
B.
|
Compensation of Officers and Directors
|
Name and Principal Position
(1)
|
Salary
(2)
|
Bonus
(3)
|
Equity-Based
Compensation
(4)
|
All
other
compensation
(
5)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
USD
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Yosef Shiran
|
440,915 | 1,958,106 | 272,701 | 39,087 | 2,710,809 | |||||||||||||||
Sagi Cohen
|
350,000 | 183,694 | 79,629 | 18,863 | 632,187 | |||||||||||||||
David Cullen
|
453,803 | 103,725 | 63,703 | 3,679 | 624,910 | |||||||||||||||
Erez Margalit
|
194,509 | 62,070 | 260,563 | -- | 517,142 | |||||||||||||||
Yair Averbuch
|
295,039 | 84,644 | 127,406 | -- | 507,089 |
|
(1)
|
All Covered Executives are employed by Caesarstone on a full time (100%) basis.
|
|
(2)
|
Salary includes the Covered Executive’s gross salary plus payment of social benefits made by us on behalf of such Covered Executive. Such benefits may include, to the extent applicable to the Covered Executive, payments, contributions and/or allocations for
savings funds (e.g., managers’ life insurance policy), education funds (referred to in Hebrew as “keren hishtalmut”), pension, severance, risk insurances (e.g., life, or work disability insurance), payments for social security and tax gross-up payments, vacation, medical insurance and benefits, convalescence or recreation pay and other benefits and perquisites consistent with our policies.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents annual bonuses granted to the Covered Executive based on formulas set forth in the respective resolutions of the Company's Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors.
|
|
(4)
|
Represents the equity-based and phantom share based compensation expenses recorded in the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, based on the option's or phantom units fair value, calculated in accordance with accounting guidance for equity-based compensation. For a discussion of the assumptions used in reaching this valuation, see Note 2u to our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes mainly leased car and mobile phone expenses.
|
C.
|
Board Practices
|
·
|
As permitted under the Companies Law, pursuant to our articles of association, the quorum required for any meeting of shareholders consists of at least two shareholders present in person, by proxy or by other voting instrument in accordance with the Companies Law, who hold at least 25% of the voting power of our shares, instead of 33 1/3% of the issued share capital required under the Nasdaq requirements. At an adjourned meeting, any number of shareholders constitutes a quorum for the business for which the original meeting was called.
|
·
|
We approve the adoption of, and material changes to, equity incentive plans in accordance with the Companies Law, which does not impose a requirement of shareholder approval for such actions.
|
·
|
an employment relationship;
|
·
|
a business or professional relationship maintained on a regular basis;
|
·
|
control; and
|
·
|
service as an office holder, excluding service as a director in a private company prior to the first offering of its shares to the public if such director was appointed as a director of the private company in order to serve as an external director following the initial public offering.
|
|
·
|
the majority of the shares that are voted at the meeting in favor of the election of the external director, excluding abstentions, include at least a majority of the votes of shareholders who are not controlling shareholders or have a personal interest in the appointment (excluding a personal interest that did not result from the shareholder’s relationship with the controlling shareholder); or
|
|
·
|
the total number of shares held by the shareholders mentioned in the paragraph above that are voted against the election of the external director does not exceed two percent of the aggregate voting rights in the company.
|
|
·
|
his/her service for each such additional term is recommended by one or more shareholders holding at least 1% of the company’s voting rights and is approved at a shareholders’ meeting by a disinterested majority, where the total number of shares held by non-controlling, disinterested shareholders voting for such reelection exceeds 2% of the aggregate voting rights in the company, subject to additional restrictions set forth in the Companies Law with respect to the affiliation of the external director nominee, as described above;
|
|
·
|
the external director proposed his or her own nomination, and such nomination was approved in accordance with the requirements described in the paragraph above; or
|
|
·
|
his/her service for each such additional term is recommended by the board of directors and is approved at a meeting of shareholders by the same majority required for the initial election of an external director (as described above).
|
·
|
the chairman of the board of directors;
|
·
|
a controlling shareholder or a relative of a controlling shareholder; and
|
·
|
any director employed by, or providing services on an ongoing basis to, the company, a controlling shareholder of the company or an entity controlled by a controlling shareholder of the company or any director who derives most of his or her income from the controlling shareholder.
|
·
|
retaining and terminating our independent auditors, subject to board of directors and shareholder ratification;
|
·
|
pre-approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors;
|
·
|
reviewing with management and our independent directors our quarterly and annual financial reports prior to their submission to the SEC; and
|
·
|
approval of certain transactions with office holders and controlling shareholders, as described above, and other related-party transactions.
|
|
·
|
conduct of the appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates to serve as directors;
|
|
·
|
review and recommend to the board any nominees for election as directors, including nominees recommended by shareholders, and consideration of the performance of incumbent directors whose terms are expiring in determining whether to nominate them to stand for re-election;
|
|
·
|
review and recommend to the board regarding board member qualifications, board composition and structure, and recommend if necessary, measures to be taken so that the board reflects the appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise and diversity required for the board; and
|
|
·
|
perform such other activities and functions as are required by applicable law, stock exchange rules or provisions in our Articles of Association, or as are otherwise necessary and advisable, in its or the board’s discretion, for the efficient discharge of its duties.
|
·
|
reviewing and recommending overall compensation policies with respect to our Chief Executive Officer and other office holders;
|
·
|
reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other office holders including evaluating their performance in light of such goals and objectives and determining their compensation based on such evaluation;
|
·
|
reviewing and approving the granting of options and other incentive awards; and
|
·
|
reviewing, evaluating and making recommendations regarding the compensation and benefits for our non-employee directors.
|
·
|
at least a majority of the shares held by all shareholders who are not controlling shareholders and do not have a personal interest in such matter, present and voting at such meeting, are voted in favor of the compensation package, excluding abstentions; or
|
·
|
the total number of shares of non-controlling shareholders and shareholders who do not have a personal interest in such matter voting against the compensation package does not exceed 2% of the aggregate voting rights in the company.
|
·
|
information on the business advisability of a given action brought for his or her approval or performed by virtue of his or her position; and
|
·
|
all other important information pertaining to such action.
|
·
|
refrain from any act involving a conflict of interest between the performance of his or her duties in the company and his or her other duties or personal affairs;
|
·
|
refrain from any activity that is competitive with the business of the company;
|
·
|
refrain from exploiting any business opportunity of the company for the purpose of gaining a personal advantage for himself or herself or others; and
|
·
|
disclose to the company any information or documents relating to the company’s affairs which the office holder received as a result of his or her position as an office holder.
|
·
|
a transaction other than in the ordinary course of business;
|
·
|
a transaction that is not on market terms; or
|
·
|
a transaction that may have a material impact on the company’s profitability, assets or liabilities.
|
·
|
a majority of the shares held by shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction and are voting at the meeting must be voted in favor of approving the transaction, excluding abstentions; or
|
·
|
the shares voted by shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction who vote against the transaction represent no more than 2.0% of the voting rights in the company.
|
·
|
an amendment to the articles of association;
|
·
|
an increase in the company’s authorized share capital;
|
·
|
a merger; and
|
·
|
the approval of related party transactions and acts of office holders that require shareholder approval.
|
·
|
a monetary liability incurred by or imposed on him or her in favor of another person pursuant to a judgment, including a settlement or arbitrator’s award approved by a court. However, if an undertaking to indemnify an office holder with respect to such liability is provided in advance, then such an undertaking must be limited to events which, in the opinion of the board of directors, can be foreseen based on the company’s activities when the undertaking to indemnify is given, and to an amount or according to criteria determined by the board of directors as reasonable under the circumstances, and such undertaking shall detail the foreseen events described above and amount or criteria;
|
·
|
reasonable litigation expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the office holder as a result of an investigation or proceeding instituted against him or her by an authority authorized to conduct such investigation or proceeding, provided that (i) no indictment was filed against such office holder as a result of such investigation or proceeding; and (ii) no financial liability, was imposed upon him or her as a substitute for the criminal proceeding as a result of such investigation or proceeding or, if such financial liability was imposed, it was imposed with respect to an offense that does not require proof of criminal intent or in connection with a monetary sanction;
|
·
|
a monetary liability imposed on him or her in favor of an injured party at an Administrative Procedure (as defined below) pursuant to Section 52(54)(a)(1)(a) of the Securities Law;
|
·
|
expenses incurred by an office holder in connection with an Administrative Procedure under the Securities Law, including reasonable litigation expenses and reasonable attorneys’ fees; and
|
·
|
reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by the office holder or imposed by a court in proceedings instituted against him or her by the company, on its behalf, or by a third party, or in connection with criminal proceedings in which the office holder was acquitted, or as a result of a conviction for an offense that does not require proof of criminal intent.
|
·
|
a breach of a fiduciary duty to the company, provided that the office holder acted in good faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not harm the company;
|
·
|
a breach of duty of care to the company or to a third party, to the extent such a breach arises out of the negligent conduct of the office holder;
|
·
|
a monetary liability imposed on the office holder in favor of a third party;
|
·
|
a monetary liability imposed on the office holder in favor of an injured party at an Administrative Procedure pursuant to Section 52(54)(a)(1)(a) of the Securities Law; and
|
·
|
expenses incurred by an office holder in connection with an Administrative Procedure, including reasonable litigation expenses and reasonable attorneys’ fees.
|
·
|
a breach of fiduciary duty, except for indemnification and insurance for a breach of the fiduciary duty to the company to the extent that the office holder acted in good faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not prejudice the company;
|
·
|
a breach of duty of care committed intentionally or recklessly, excluding a breach arising out of the negligent conduct of the office holder;
|
·
|
an act or omission committed with intent to derive illegal personal benefit; or
|
·
|
a fine or forfeit levied against the office holder.
|
|
D.
|
Employees
|
As of December 31,
|
||||||||||||
Department
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||||||
Manufacturing and operations
|
659
|
595
|
537
|
|||||||||
Research and development
|
14
|
13
|
12
|
|||||||||
Sales, marketing, service and support
|
318
|
272
|
259
|
|||||||||
Management and administration
|
117
|
106
|
75
|
|||||||||
Total
|
1,108
|
986
|
883
|
|
E.
|
Share Ownership
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Held(1)
|
Percent of Class
|
||
Executive Officers
|
||||
Yosef Shiran
|
-
|
-
|
||
Yair Averbuch
|
*
|
*
|
||
David Cullen
|
*
|
*
|
||
Sagi Cohen
|
*
|
*
|
||
Giora Wegman
|
-
|
-
|
||
Michal Baumwald Oron
|
*
|
*
|
||
Eli Feiglin
|
*
|
*
|
||
Erez Schweppe
|
*
|
*
|
||
HaHHarel Boker
|
*
|
*
|
||
Tzvika Rimon
|
*
|
*
|
||
Erez Margalit
|
*
|
*
|
||
Lilach Gilboa
|
*
|
*
|
||
Directors
|
||||
Maxim Ohana
|
-
|
-
|
||
Yonatan Melamed
|
-
|
-
|
||
Moshe Ronen
|
-
|
-
|
||
Ofer Tsimchi
|
-
|
-
|
||
Or Gilboa
|
-
|
-
|
||
Shachar Degani
|
-
|
-
|
||
Amihai Beer
|
-
|
-
|
||
Irit Ben-Dov
|
-
|
-
|
||
Ofer Borovsky
|
-
|
-
|
||
Ram Belinkov
|
-
|
-
|
||
Avner Naveh
|
-
|
-
|
||
All directors and executive officers as a group (23 persons)
|
135,480
|
0.4%
|
___________________________________
|
|
a.
|
Major Shareholders
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned
|
Percentage of Shares Beneficially Held
|
||||||
Kibbutz Sdot-Yam (1)
|
11,440,000
|
32.6
|
% | |||||
FMR LLC (2)
|
3,510,284
|
10.0
|
% | |||||
Baron Capital Group, Inc. (3)
|
3,459,283
|
9.8
|
%
|
|||||
Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC (4) | 2,108,942 | 6.0 |
%
|
|
b.
|
Related Party Transactions
|
c.
|
Interests of Experts and Counsel
|
|
a.
|
Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information
|
|
b.
|
Significant Changes
|
|
a.
|
Offer and Listing Details
|
Nasdaq Global Select Market
|
||||
Annual
|
High
|
Low
|
||
(price per ordinary share)
|
||||
2014
|
63.92
|
42.25
|
||
2013
|
52.45
|
16.15
|
||
2012 (beginning on March 22, 2012)
|
17.39
|
10.08
|
Nasdaq Global Select Market
|
||||
Quarterly
|
High
|
Low
|
||
(price per ordinary share)
|
||||
First Quarter 2015 (through March 3, 2015)
|
66.27
|
55.95
|
||
Fourth Quarter 2014
|
63.92
|
44.93
|
||
Third Quarter 2014
|
53.67
|
42.51
|
||
Second Quarter 2014
|
59.32
|
44.10
|
||
First Quarter 2014
|
61.91
|
42.25
|
||
Fourth Quarter 2013
|
52.45
|
36.26
|
||
Third Quarter 2013
|
48.69
|
26.80
|
||
Second Quarter 2013
|
30.26
|
21.60
|
||
First Quarter 2013
|
27.86
|
16.15
|
||
Fourth Quarter 2012
|
17.39
|
14.01
|
||
Third Quarter 2012
|
14.52
|
10.08
|
||
Second Quarter 2012
|
13.88
|
10.75
|
||
First Quarter 2012 (beginning on March 22, 2012)
|
12.33
|
10.70
|
Nasdaq Global Select Market
|
||||
Most Recent Six Months
|
High
|
Low
|
||
(price per ordinary share)
|
||||
February 2015
|
65.70
|
59.33
|
||
January 2015
|
64.47
|
55.95
|
||
December 2014
|
61.87
|
56.15
|
||
November 2014
|
63.92
|
55.31
|
||
October 2014
|
56.46
|
44.93
|
||
September 2014
|
52.89
|
50.32
|
|
b.
|
Plan of Distribution
|
|
c.
|
Markets
|
|
d.
|
Selling Shareholders
|
|
e.
|
Dilution
|
|
f.
|
Expenses of the Issue
|
|
a.
|
Share Capital
|
|
b.
|
Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association
|
|
c.
|
Material Contracts
|
Material Contract
|
Location in this Annual Report
|
Agreements with Kibbutz Sdot-Yam
|
“ITEM 7: Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Relationship and agreements with Kibbutz Sdot-Yam.”
|
Summary of verbal
agreement
for 2015 between the Registrant and Mikroman Madencilik San ve TIC.LTD.STI
|
“ITEM 3: Key Information—Risk Factors— We may encounter significant delays in manufacturing if we are required to change the suppliers for the quartz used in the production of our products.”
|
Summary of draft agreement between the Registrant and Polat Maden Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. with respect to the supply of quartz for 2015
|
“ITEM 3: Key Information—Risk Factors— We may encounter significant delays in manufacturing if we are required to change the suppliers for the quartz used in the production of our products.”
|
Agreements with Breton S.p.A. (Italy)
|
“ITEM 3: Key Information—Risk Factors—We are working to increase our production capacity for our quartz surface products in the United States in order to meet anticipated demand through expanding our manufacturing facilities. If we fail to achieve this further expansion, we may be unable to grow our business and revenue, maintain our competitive position or improve our profitability.
“
|
2011 Incentive Compensation Plan
|
“ITEM 6: Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Compensation of Officers and Directors—Equity incentive plan”.
|
Compensation Policy
|
“ITEM 6: Directors, Senior Management and Employees— Board Practices –Compensation Committee.”
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
|
“ITEM 6: Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Board Practices—Exculpation, insurance and indemnification of officer holders”.
|
Registration Rights Agreement
|
“ITEM 7: Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Registration Rights Agreement”.
|
Extension of Registration Rights Agreement
|
“ITEM 7: Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Registration Rights Agreement.”
|
|
d.
|
Exchange Controls
|
|
e.
|
Taxation
|
1.
|
Similar to the Alternative Track, an exemption from corporate tax may be available on undistributed income for a period of two to ten years, depending on the location of the Beneficiary Enterprise within Israel, as well as a reduced corporate tax rate of 10% to 25% for the remainder of the benefit period, depending on the level of foreign investment in each year (the “Tax Benefits Track”). Benefits are generally granted for a term of seven to ten years, depending on the location of the enterprise within Israel and the level of foreign investment in the company. However, a company that pays a dividend out of income generated from the Beneficiary Enterprise during the tax exemption period is subject to the deferred corporate tax with respect to the amount distributed (grossed up with the effective corporate tax rate which would have applied if the company had not enjoyed the exemption) at a reduced tax rate between 10% and 25%, depending on the level of foreign investment. The company is required to withhold tax on such distribution at a rate of 15% (or at a reduced rate under an applicable double tax treaty); or
|
2.
|
A special track which enables companies owning facilities in certain locations within Israel to pay corporate tax at the flat rate of 11.5% on the income of the Beneficiary Enterprise (the “Ireland Track”). The benefit period is for ten years. Upon payment of a dividend, the company will not be required to pay an additional corporate tax, but will be subject to a withholding tax on such dividend at a rate of 15% for Israeli residents and at a rate of 4% for foreign residents.
|
1.
|
In 2011-2012, the reduced tax rate is 10% or 15% depending on the Preferred Enterprise’s location in Israel.
|
2.
|
In 2013-2014, the reduced tax rate will be 7% or 12.5% depending on the Preferred Enterprise’s location in Israel.
|
3.
|
In 2015 and onwards, the reduced tax rate will be 6% or 12% depending on the Preferred Enterprise’s location in Israel.
|
4.
|
Subsequently, on August 5, 2013, the 2014 and onwards tax bracket was increased by the Knesset to 9% or 16% depending on the Preferred Enterprise’s location in Israel.
|
·
|
banks, financial institutions or insurance companies;
|
·
|
real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies or grantor trusts;
|
·
|
dealers or traders in securities, commodities or currencies;
|
·
|
tax-exempt entities;
|
·
|
certain former citizens or long-term residents of the United States;
|
·
|
persons that received our shares as compensation for the performance of services;
|
·
|
persons that will hold our shares as part of a “hedging,” “integrated” or “conversion” transaction or as a position in a “straddle” for United States federal income tax purposes;
|
·
|
partnerships (including entities classified as partnerships for United States federal income tax purposes) or other pass-through entities, or holders that will hold our shares through such an entity;
|
·
|
S-corporations;
|
·
|
holders that acquire ordinary shares as a result of holding or owning our preferred shares;
|
·
|
U.S. Holders (as defined below) whose “functional currency” is not the U.S. Dollar; or
|
·
|
holders that own directly, indirectly or through attribution 10.0% or more of the voting power or value of our shares.
|
·
|
a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
·
|
a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof, including the District of Columbia;
|
·
|
an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
·
|
a trust if such trust has validly elected to be treated as a United States person for United States federal income tax purposes or if (1) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and (2) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all of the substantial decisions of such trust.
|
·
|
at least 75% of its gross income is “passive income”; or
|
·
|
at least 50% of the average value of its gross assets is attributable to assets that produce “passive income” or are held for the production of passive income.
|
|
f.
|
Dividends and Paying Agents
|
g.
|
Statements by Experts
|
h.
|
Documents on Display
|
|
i.
|
Subsidiary Information
|
Australian dollar against U.S. dollar
|
Canadian dollar against U.S. dollar
|
NIS against U.S. dollar
|
Euro against U.S. dollar
|
|||||||||
2012
|
0.3%
|
(1.1)%
|
(7.2)%
|
(7.6)%
|
||||||||
2013
|
(6.4)%
|
(2.9)%
|
6.8%
|
3.4%
|
||||||||
2014
|
(6.7)%
|
(6.7)%
|
1.1%
|
0.0%
|
USD/NIS
|
USD/CAD
|
EUR/USD
|
AUD/USD
|
TOTAL
|
|||||||||||||||||
Buy forward contracts
|
Notional
|
– | 9,564 | 16,126 | – | 25,689 | |||||||||||||||
Fair value
|
– | 426 | (1,053 | ) | – | (627 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Average rate
|
– | 1.11 | 1.30 | – | |||||||||||||||||
Sell forward contracts
|
Notional
|
12,925 | – | – | 21,067 | 33,992 | |||||||||||||||
Fair value
|
(1,447 | ) | – | – | 1,803 | 355 | |||||||||||||||
Average rate
|
3.45 | – | – | 0.88 | |||||||||||||||||
Buy put options
|
Notional
|
20,411 | – | – | – | 20,411 | |||||||||||||||
Fair value
|
250 | – | – | – | 250 | ||||||||||||||||
Average rate
|
3.77 | – | – | – | |||||||||||||||||
Sell call options
|
Notional
|
19,472 | – | – | – | 19,472 | |||||||||||||||
Fair value
|
(400 | ) | – | – | – | (400 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Average rate
|
3.95 | – | – | – | |||||||||||||||||
Total notional value
|
52,808 | 9,564 | 16,126 | 21,067 | 99,565 | ||||||||||||||||
Total fair value
|
$ | (1,596 | ) | $ | 426 | $ | (1,053 | ) | $ | 1,803 | $ | (421 | ) |
·
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
|
·
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
|
·
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
||||||||
Audit fees(1)
|
$
|
505
|
$
|
416
|
||||
Audit-related fees(2)
|
146
|
178
|
||||||
Tax fees(3)
|
80
|
56
|
||||||
All other fees(4)
|
101
|
48
|
||||||
Total
|
$
|
832
|
$
|
698
|
______________________
|
|
(1)
|
“Audit fees” include fees for services performed by our independent public accounting firm in connection with the integrated audit of our annual audit consolidated financial statement for 2014 and 2013, and its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, certain procedures regarding our quarterly financial results submitted on Form 6-K, fees related to public offering, and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
|
|
(2)
|
“Audit-related fees relate to assurance and associated services that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor, including fees related to follow-on offerings.
|
|
(3)
|
“Tax fees” include fees for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for tax compliance and tax advice on actual or contemplated transactions.
|
|
(4)
|
“Other fees” include fees for services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm with respect to government incentives, due diligence investigations and other matters.
|
|
·
|
We follow the requirements of Israeli law with respect to the quorum requirement for meetings of our shareholders, which are different from the requirements of Rule 5620(c). Under our articles of association, the quorum required for an ordinary meeting of shareholders consists of at least two shareholders present in person, by proxy or by written ballot, who hold or represent between them at least 25% of the voting power of our shares, instead of 33 1/3% of the issued share capital provided by under the Nasdaq rules. At an adjourned meeting, any number of shareholders constitutes a quorum. This quorum requirement is based on the default requirement set forth in the Companies Law. We submitted a letter to the Nasdaq Global Select Market from our outside counsel in connection with this item prior to our IPO in March 2012.
|
|
·
|
We do not seek shareholder approval for equity compensation plans in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Law, which does not fully reflect the requirements of Rule 5635(c). Under Israeli law, we may amend our 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan or adopt a new equity compensation plan by the approval of our board of directors, and without shareholder approval as is generally required under Rule 5635(c). Under Israeli law, the adoption and amendment of equity compensation plans, including changes to the reserved shares, do not require shareholder approval. We submitted a letter to the Nasdaq Global Select Market from our outside counsel in connection with this item prior to our IPO in March 2012.
|
Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd.
|
|||
By:
|
/s/ Yosef Shiran
|
||
Yosef Shiran
|
|||
Chief Executive Officer
|
Number
|
Description
|
1.1
|
Articles of Association of the Registrant, as amended on February
21, 2014 (5)
|
1.2
|
Memorandum of Association of the Registrant (2)
¥
|
4.1
|
Land Purchase Agreement and Leaseback, by and between Kibbutz Sdot-Yam and the Registrant, dated March 31, 2011 (3)
¥
|
4.2
|
Addendum, dated February 13, 2012 to the Land Purchase Agreement and Leaseback, by and between Kibbutz Sdot-Yam and the Registrant, dated March 31, 2011 (3)
¥
|
4.3
|
Lease agreement for Bar-Lev Industrial Park, by and between the Registrant and the Israeli Lands Administration, dated June 6, 2007 (3)
¥
|
4.4
|
Agreement by and between Mikroman Madencilik San ve TIC.LTD.STI and the Registrant, dated September 27, 2010 (1)*
¥
|
4.5
|
Summary of verbal agreement between the Registrant and Mikroman Madencilik San ve TIC.LTD.STI for 2015 *
|
4.6
|
2011 Incentive Compensation Plan (2)
|
4.7
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement (3)
|
4.8
|
Land Use Agreement, by and between Kibbutz Sdot-Yam and the Registrant, dated July 20, 2011 (3)
¥
|
4.9
|
Addendum, dated February 13, 2012 to the Land Use Agreement, by and between Kibbutz Sdot-Yam and the Registrant, dated July 20, 2011 (3)
¥
|
4.10
|
Manpower Agreement, by and between Kibbutz Sdot-Yam and the Registrant, dated July 20, 2011 (3)
¥
|
4.11
|
Services Agreement, by and between Kibbutz Sdot-Yam and the Registrant, dated July 20, 2011 (3)
¥
|
4.12
|
Addendum, dated February 13, 2012 to the Services Agreement, by and between Kibbutz Sdot-Yam and the Registrant, dated July 20, 2011 (3)
¥
|
4.13
|
Agreement for Arranging Additional Accord, by and between Kibbutz Sdot-Yam and the Registrant, dated July 20, 2011 (3)
¥
|
4.14
|
Addendum, dated February 13, 2012 to the Agreement for Arranging Additional Accord, by and between Kibbutz Sdot-Yam and the Registrant, dated July 20, 2011 (3)
¥
|
4.15
|
Registration Rights Agreement, by and among the Registrant, Kibbutz Sdot-Yam, Tene Quartz Surfaces Investments Limited Partnership and Tene Quartz Surfaces Investments (Parallel) Limited Partnership, dated July 21, 2011 (3)
|
4.16
|
Extension of Registration Rights Agreement, by and among the Registrant, Kibbutz Sdot-Yam, Tene Quartz Surfaces Investments Limited Partnership and Tene Quartz Surfaces Investments (Parallel) Limited Partnership, dated February 13, 2012 (3)
|
4.17
|
Reimbursement Agreement, dated January 4, 2012, by and between the Registrant and Kibbutz Sdot-Yam (3)
¥
|
4.18
|
Compensation Policy of Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd. (4)
|
4.19
|
Agreement for the Supply of Bretonstone Slab Plants, dated October 18, 2012 *
|
4.20
|
Amendment, dated January 2, 2013, to the Agreement for the Supply of Bretonstone Slab Plants, dated October 18, 2012 *
|
4.21
|
Addendum number 1, dated July 4, 2013, to the Agreement for the Supply of Bretonstone Slab Plants, dated October 18, 2012 *
|
4.22
|
Addendum number 2, dated October 4, 2013, to the Agreement for the Supply of Bretonstone Slab Plants, dated October 18, 2012 *
|
(1)
|
Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 2012 pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-179556) and incorporated by reference herein.
|
(2)
|
Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2012 pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-179556) and incorporated by reference herein.
|
(3)
|
Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2012 pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-179556) and incorporated by reference herein.
|
(4)
|
Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 16, 2014 pursuant to a report on Form 6-K and incorporated by reference herein.
|
(5)
|
Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2014 pursuant to an annual report on Form 20-F and incorporated by reference herein.
|
*
|
Portions of this exhibit were omitted and have been filed separately with the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Registrant’s application requesting confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
¥
|
English translation of original Hebrew document.
|
Page
|
|
F-2 - F-3
|
|
F-4 - F-5
|
|
F-6
|
|
F-7
|
|
F-8
|
|
F-9 - F-11
|
|
F-12 - F-68
|
|
F - 69 - F - 70 |
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
2 Pal-Yam Blvd. Brosh Bldg.
Haifa 3309502, Israel
|
Tel: +972-4-8654000
Fax: +972-3-5633439
ey.com
|
/s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
|
|
Haifa, Israel
|
KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
|
March 12, 2015
|
A Member of Ernst & Young Global
|
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
2 Pal-Yam Blvd. Brosh Bldg.
Haifa 3309502, Israel
|
Tel: +972-4-8654000
Fax: +972-3-5633439
ey.com
|
December 31,
|
|||||||||||
Note
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||||||
Current assets:
|
|||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 42,280 | $ | 22,248 | |||||||
Short-term bank deposits
|
12,047 | 70,000 | |||||||||
Trade receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,225
and $1,898 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively)
|
56,217 | 52,304 | |||||||||
Other accounts receivable and prepaid expenses
|
3 | 22,729 | 22,853 | ||||||||
Inventories
|
4 | 80,212 | 57,867 | ||||||||
Total
current assets
|
213,485 | 225,272 | |||||||||
Long-term assets:
|
|||||||||||
Severance pay fund
|
3,744 | 3,973 | |||||||||
Long-term deposits and prepaid expenses
|
759 | 1,603 | |||||||||
Total
long-term assets
|
4,503 | 5,576 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
5 | 172,993 | 93,634 | ||||||||
Other assets
|
6 | 10,059 | 13,372 | ||||||||
Goodwill
|
7 | 37,960 | 39,702 | ||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 439,000 | $ | 377,556 |
December 31,
|
|||||||||||
Note
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|||||||||||
Current liabilities:
|
|||||||||||
Short-term bank credit
|
8 | $ | - | $ | 5,454 | ||||||
Trade payables
|
59,430 | 50,624 | |||||||||
Account payables and current maturities to related parties, including financing leaseback from related party
|
14 | 3,975 | 2,602 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
9 | 25,774 | 20,890 | ||||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
89,179 | 79,570 | |||||||||
Long-term liabilities:
|
|||||||||||
Long-term loan and financing leaseback from a related party
|
14 | 8,993 | 12,342 | ||||||||
Accrued severance pay
|
4,217 | 4,472 | |||||||||
Long-term warranty provision
|
1,145 | 1,704 | |||||||||
Phantom share based payment
|
805 | - | |||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities, net
|
12 | 4,935 | 6,245 | ||||||||
Total
long-term liabilities
|
20,095 | 24,763 | |||||||||
Redeemable non-controlling interest
|
2(v) | 8,715 | 7,624 | ||||||||
Commitments and contingent liabilities
|
11 | ||||||||||
Equity:
|
13 | ||||||||||
Share capital-
|
|||||||||||
Ordinary shares of NIS 0.04 par value - 200,000,000 shares
authorized at December 31, 2014 and 2013; 35,132,127 and
34,739,315 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014
and 2013, respectively
|
369 | 364 | |||||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
139,964 | 138,757 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net
|
(534 | ) | 3,680 | ||||||||
Retained earnings
|
181,212 | 122,798 | |||||||||
Total
equity
|
321,011 | 265,599 | |||||||||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$ | 439,000 | $ | 377,556 |
Year ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 447,402 | $ | 356,554 | $ | 296,564 | ||||||
Cost of revenues
|
257,751 | 194,436 | 169,169 | |||||||||
Gross profit
|
189,651 | 162,118 | 127,395 | |||||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||
Research and development (net of grants and participations
for the amount of $0, $11 and $310 for the years ended
December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively)
|
2,628 | 2,002 | 2,100 | |||||||||
Marketing and selling
|
55,870 | 51,209 | 46,911 | |||||||||
General and administrative
|
36,111 | 32,904 | 28,423 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
94,609 | 86,115 | 77,434 | |||||||||
Operating income
|
95,042 | 76,003 | 49,961 | |||||||||
Finance expenses, net
|
1,045 | 1,314 | 2,773 | |||||||||
Income before taxes on income
|
93,997 | 74,689 | 47,188 | |||||||||
Taxes on income
|
13,738 | 10,336 | 6,821 | |||||||||
Income after taxes on income
|
80,259 | 64,353 | 40,367 | |||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 80,259 | $ | 64,353 | $ | 40,367 | ||||||
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest
|
1,820 | 1,009 | 735 | |||||||||
Net income attributable to controlling interest
|
$ | 78,439 | $ | 63,344 | $ | 39,632 | ||||||
Basic net income per share of ordinary shares
|
2.25 | 1.83 | 1.21 | |||||||||
Diluted net income per share of ordinary shares
|
2.22 | 1.80 | 1.21 | |||||||||
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in
computing basic income per share (in thousands)
|
34,932 | 34,667 | 32,642 | |||||||||
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in
computing diluted income per share (in thousands)
|
35,394 | 35,210 | 32,700 |
Year ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 80,259 | $ | 64,353 | $ | 40,367 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax:
|
||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(4,227 | ) | (6,182 | ) | 2,779 | |||||||
Unrealized loss on foreign currency cash flow hedge
|
(1,562 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) related to components of other comprehensive income
|
846 | 855 | (402 | ) | ||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
(4,943 | ) | (5,327 | ) | 2,377 | |||||||
Comprehensive income
|
75,316 | 59,026 | 42,744 | |||||||||
Less: comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest
|
(1,091 | ) | (519 | ) | (901 | ) | ||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interest
|
$ | 74,225 | $ | 58,507 | $ | 41,843 |
Common Stock
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Preferred shares
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
Retained earnings
|
Foreign currency translation - Company
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net(1)
|
Total
equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of January 1, 2012
|
19,565,000 | $ | 192 | $ | 86 | $ | 55,338 | $ | 67,153 | $ | 7,376 | $ | 6,306 | $ | 136,451 | |||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 2,211 | 2,211 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
- | - | - | - | 39,632 | - | - | 39,632 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of ordinary shares, net of issuance expenses of $8,825
|
7,659,000 | 82 | - | 76,439 | - | - | - | 76,521 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of preferred shares to ordinary shares
|
7,141,250 | 86 | (86 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-based compensation expense related to employees
|
- | - | - | 3,660 | - | - | - | 3,660 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend
|
- | - | - | - | (27,182 | ) | - | - | (27,182 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation – company (Note 2b)
|
- | - | - | - | - | (7,376 | ) | - | (7,376 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2012
|
34,365,250 | 360 | - | 135,437 | 79,603 | - | 8,517 | 223,917 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (4,837 | ) | (4,837 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
- | - | - | - | 63,344 | - | - | 63,344 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-based compensation expense related to employees
|
- | - | - | 2,514 | - | - | - | 2,514 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash less exercise of options
|
374,065 | 4 | - | (4 | ) | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend
|
- | - | - | - | (20,149 | ) | - | - | (20,149 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation paid by a former shareholder (2)
|
- | - | - | 810 | - | - | - | 810 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2013
|
34,739,315 | 364 | - | 138,757 | 122,798 | - | 3,680 | 265,599 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (4,214 | ) | (4,214 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
- | - | - | - | 78,439 | - | - | 78,439 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-based compensation expense related to employees
|
- | - | - | 1,212 | - | - | - | 1,212 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash less exercise of options
|
392,812 | 5 | - | (5 | ) | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend
|
- | - | - | - | (20,025 | ) | - | - | (20,025 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2014
|
35,132,127 | $ | 369 | $ | - | $ | 139,964 | $ | 181,212 | $ | - | $ | (534 | ) | $ | 321,011 |
|
(1)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net, comprised of foreign currency translation and hedging transactions.
|
|
(2)
|
A bonus paid by the Company's former shareholder, Tene Investment Fund ("Tene"), to certain of its employees. According to U.S. GAAP in cases when the compensation is provided by a holder with economic interest, it is required to expense this compensation against paid-in capital.
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 80,259 | $ | 64,353 | $ | 40,367 | ||||||
Adjustments required to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
17,176 | 14,994 | 14,368 | |||||||||
Share-based compensation expense
|
2,642 | 2,514 | 3,660 | |||||||||
Decrease in share-based payment in subsidiary
|
- | - | (1,383 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued severance pay, net
|
(26 | ) | (64 | ) | (61 | ) | ||||||
Changes in deferred tax, net
|
(2,580 | ) | 674 | (1,927 | ) | |||||||
Capital gains
|
- | (22 | ) | (79 | ) | |||||||
Compensation paid by a former shareholder
|
- | 810 | - | |||||||||
Foreign currency translation losses (gains)
|
- | (132 | ) | 417 | ||||||||
Increase in trade receivables
|
(3,913 | ) | (8,238 | ) | (8,561 | ) | ||||||
Decrease (increase) in other accounts receivable and prepaid expenses
|
1,393 | (7,419 | ) | (3,291 | ) | |||||||
Increase in inventories
|
(22,345 | ) | (7,317 | ) | (3,816 | ) | ||||||
Increase in trade payables
|
1,811 | 9,351 | 5,201 | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in warranty provision
|
(4 | ) | 401 | 297 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities including related parties
|
1,611 | 5,765 | (9,922 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
76,024 | 75,670 | 35,270 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Redemption of (investment in) short-term deposits
|
57,953 | (26,300 | ) | (43,700 | ) | |||||||
Acquisition of the business of Prema Asia Marketing PTE Ltd. (see also Note 1c)
|
(150 | ) | - | (150 | ) | |||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
(86,373 | ) | (27,372 | ) | (13,481 | ) | ||||||
Decease (increase) in long-term deposits
|
844 | (405 | ) | (849 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(27,726 | ) | (54,077 | ) | (58,180 | ) |
Year ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Dividends paid
|
$ | (20,025 | ) | $ | (20,149 | ) | $ | (27,182 | ) | |||
Receipt from issuance of ordinary shares, net
|
- | - | 76,768 | |||||||||
Repayment of long-term loans
|
- | (5,372 | ) | (12,670 | ) | |||||||
Short-term bank credit and loans, net
|
(5,454 | ) | 206 | 1,275 | ||||||||
Repayment of contingent consideration related to U.S. Quartz Products, Inc. acquisition
|
- | - | (6,242 | ) | ||||||||
Receipt of a financing leaseback related to Bar-Lev transaction
|
- | - | 10,893 | |||||||||
Repayment of a financing leaseback related to Bar-Lev transaction
|
(1,192 | ) | (1,149 | ) | (362 | ) | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(26,671 | ) | (26,464 | ) | 42,480 | |||||||
Effect of exchange rate differences on cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,595 | ) | (1,914 | ) | (2,487 | ) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
20,032 | (6,785 | ) | 17,083 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
22,248 | 29,033 | 11,950 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$ | 42,280 | $ | 22,248 | $ | 29,033 | ||||||
Cash received (paid) during the year for:
|
||||||||||||
Interest paid
|
$ | (141 | ) | $ | (946 | ) | $ | (1,947 | ) | |||
Interest received
|
$ | 46 | $ | 420 | $ | 376 | ||||||
Tax paid
|
$ | (16,744 | ) | $ | (9,434 | ) | $ | (7,895 | ) |
Year ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Purchase of fixed assets with credit from suppliers
|
$ | 6,992 | $ | 4,880 | $ | 2,141 |
|
a.
|
General:
|
|
b.
|
Acquisition of shares of U.S. Quartz Products, Inc.:
|
|
b.
|
Acquisition of shares of U.S. Quartz Products, Inc.: (Cont.):
|
|
c.
|
Acquisition of the business of Prema Asia Marketing PTE Ltd. ("Prema"):
|
|
d.
|
Major suppliers:
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
|
a.
|
Use of estimates:
|
|
b.
|
Financial statements in U.S. dollars:
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONT.)
|
|
b.
|
Financial statements in U.S. dollars (cont.):
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
b.
|
Financial statements in U.S. dollars (Cont.):
|
|
c.
|
Principles of consolidation:
|
|
d.
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
e.
|
Short-term bank deposits:
Short-term bank deposits are deposits with original maturities of more than three months but less than one year. The short-term bank deposits are presented at their cost, which approximates their fair value.
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
f.
|
Derivatives:
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
f.
|
Derivatives (Cont.):
|
Balance Sheet
|
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
|
||||||||
Year ended December 31,
|
|||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||
Derivative Assets:
|
|||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|||||||||
Foreign exchange option and forward contracts
|
Prepaid expenses and other receivables
|
$
|
2,479
|
$
|
2,353
|
||||
Total
|
$
|
2,479
|
$
|
2,353
|
|||||
Derivative Liabilities
|
|||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|||||||||
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
Other accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
(1,447
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
|||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|||||||||
Foreign exchange option and forward contracts
|
Other accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
(1,453
|
) | $ |
(64
|
) | ||
Total
|
$
|
(2,900
|
) |
$
|
(64
|
) |
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
f.
|
Derivatives (Cont.):
|
Loss Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income, net
|
Gain (loss) Recognized in Statements of Operations
|
||||||||||||||||
Year ended
December 31,
|
Statements of Operations
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
Item
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange forward contract
|
$
|
(1,334
|
)
|
$ |
-
|
Operating expenses
|
$
|
(834
|
)
|
$ |
-
|
||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange forward and options contracts
|
$ |
-
|
$ |
-
|
Financial expense (income), net
|
$ |
(153
|
)
|
$ |
6,667
|
|||||||
Total
|
$
|
(1,334
|
) |
$
|
-
|
$
|
(987
|
) |
$
|
6,667
|
|
g.
|
Inventories:
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
g.
|
Inventories (Cont.):
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||
Inventory provision, beginning of year
|
$ | 6,268 | $ | 5,807 | ||||
Increase in inventory provision
|
1,707 | 986 | ||||||
Write off
|
(251 | ) | (525 | ) | ||||
Inventory provision, end of year
|
$ | 7,724 | $ | 6,268 |
|
h.
|
Property, plant and equipment, net:
|
|
1.
|
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and investment grants.
Costs recorded prior to a production line completion are reflected as construction in progress, which are recorded to Land, building and machinery assets at the date purchase. Construction in progress includes direct expenditures for the construction of the production line and is stated at cost. Capitalized costs include costs incurred under the construction contract: advisory, consulting and direct internal costs (including labor) and operating costs incurred during the construction and installation phase.
|
|
2.
|
Materials, payroll and other costs that are direct incremental costs necessary to bring an asset to the condition of its intended use are capitalized as part of the cost of property, plant and equipment.
|
|
3.
|
Depreciation is calculated by the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets at the following annual rates:
|
%
|
|
Machinery and manufacturing equipment
|
4-33
|
Office equipment and furniture
|
7-33
|
Motor vehicles
|
10-30
|
Buildings
|
4-5
|
Leasehold improvments
|
Over the shorter of the term of
the lease or the life of the asset
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
h.
|
Property, plant and equipment (Cont.):
|
|
i.
|
Impairment of long-lived assets:
|
|
j.
|
Goodwill:
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
j.
|
Goodwill (Cont.):
|
|
k.
|
Warranty
:
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||
Warranty provision, beginning of year
|
$ | 2,624 | $ | 2,223 | ||||
Charged to costs and expenses relating to new sales
|
1,154 | 1,338 | ||||||
Costs of product warranty claims
|
(989 | ) | (1,159 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(169 | ) | 222 | |||||
Warranty provision, end of year
|
$ | 2,620 | $ | 2,624 |
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
l.
|
Revenue recognition:
|
|
m.
|
Research and development costs:
|
|
n.
|
Income taxes:
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
n.
|
Income taxes (cont.):
|
|
o.
|
Advertising expenses:
|
|
p.
|
Concentrations of credit risk:
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
p.
|
Concentrations of credit risk (cont.):
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||
Balance at the beginning of the year
|
$ | 1,898 | $ | 1,127 | ||||
Charges to expenses
|
974 | 1,263 | ||||||
Write offs
|
(544 | ) | (389 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(103 | ) | (103 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of the year
|
$ | 2,225 | $ | 1,898 |
|
q.
|
Severance pay:
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
q.
|
Severance pay(cont.):
|
|
r.
|
Fair value of financial instruments:
|
|
Level 1-
|
Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the Company has the ability to access. Valuation adjustments and block discounts are not applied to Level 1 instruments. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these products does not entail a significant degree of judgment.
|
|
Level 2-
|
Valuations based on one or more quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
|
|
Level 3-
|
Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
r.
|
Fair value of financial instruments (Cont.):
|
December 31, 2014
|
||||||||||||||||
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Derivatives:
|
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currencies derivative assets
|
$ | - | $ | 2,479 | $ | - | $ | 2,479 | ||||||||
Foreign currencies derivative liabilities
|
$ | - | $ | (2,900 | ) | $ | - | $ | (2,900 | ) | ||||||
Total
|
$ | - | $ | (421 | ) | $ | - | $ | (421 | ) |
December 31, 2013
|
||||||||||||||||
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Derivatives:
|
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currencies derivative assets
|
$ | - | $ | 2,353 | $ | - | $ | 2,353 | ||||||||
Foreign currencies derivative liabilities
|
$ | - | $ | (64 | ) | $ | - | $ | (64 | ) | ||||||
Total
|
$ | - | $ | 2,289 | $ | - | $ | 2,289 |
|
s.
|
Basic and diluted net income per share:
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
s.
|
Basic and diluted net income per share (Cont.):
|
|
t.
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
u.
|
Accounting for stock-based compensation:
|
|
1.
|
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, "Compensation-Stock Compensation" ("ASC 718"). ASC 718 requires companies to estimate the fair value of equity-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model.
The Company accounts for employees’ share-based payment awards classified as equity awards using the grant-date fair value method. The fair value of share-based payment transactions is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The Company estimates forfeitures based on historical experience and anticipated future conditions. The Company elected to recognize compensation expense for an award that has a graded vesting schedule using the accelerated method.
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
u.
|
Accounting for stock-based compensation (Cont.):
|
|
1.
|
Cont.
|
2012
|
||||
Dividend yield
|
0 | % | ||
Expected volatility
|
57 | % | ||
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.73 | % | ||
Expected life (in years)
|
4.22 |
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
u.
|
Accounting for stock-based compensation (Cont.):
|
|
2.
|
Phantom share based payment:
During 2014, the Company granted several of its employees a right to a bonus payment based on an increase in the Company’s ordinary share value (the "phantom award") and under which the employees are entitled to receive in cash or shares the difference between exercise price, subject to adjustments for dividend distributions made until the actual payment of the bonus and the value of the Company’s ordinary shares with such bonus right vesting over a four-year period on an annual basis.
According to ASC 718-10, “instruments that are required to be cash-settled (e.g., cash-settled stock appreciation rights) or require cash settlement on the occurrence of a contingent event that is considered probable” should be treated as a liability. As such, in this case the share-based compensation is accounted for as a liability award. According to ASC 718-10, in connection with the measurement of the liability settlement, the value of the award should be measured each reporting date until settlement. The fair value of the phantom award was calculated using the Binominal option pricing model.
After implementing the above accounting treatment, the liability balance that the Company recorded as of December 31, 2014 was $1,555. As of December 31, 2014, there was $2,547 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the phantom award.
As of December 31, 2014, the Company estimated the fair value of phantom awards granted using the binominal option pricing model with the following
weighted average assumptions:
|
December 31, 2014
|
||||
Dividend yield
|
0 | % | ||
Expected volatility
|
45 | % | ||
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.9 | % | ||
Expected life (in years)
|
6.3 |
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
v.
|
Redeemable non-controlling interest:
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Beginning of the year
|
$ | 7,624 | $ | 7,106 | $ | 6,205 | ||||||
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest
|
1,820 | 1,009 | 735 | |||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(729 | ) | (491 | ) | 166 | |||||||
Redeemable non-controlling interest - end of the year
|
$ | 8,715 | $ | 7,624 | $ | 7,106 |
|
w.
|
Comprehensive (loss) income:
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||
Accumulated losses on derivative instruments
|
$ | (1,334 | ) | $ | - | |||
Accumulated foreign currency translation differences
|
800 | 3,680 | ||||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive income, net
|
$ | (534 | ) | $ | 3,680 |
|
w.
|
Comprehensive (loss) income (Cont.)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments
|
Accumulated foreign currency translation differences
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2013
|
$ | - | $ | 3,680 | $ | 3,680 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
|
(2,168 | ) | (2,880 | ) | (5,048 | ) | ||||||
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
|
834 | - | 834 | |||||||||
Net current period other comprehensive income
|
(1,334 | ) | (2,880 | ) | (4,214 | ) | ||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2014
|
$ | (1,334 | ) | $ | 800 | $ | (534 | ) |
|
w.
|
Comprehensive (loss) income (Cont.)
|
Year ended
December 31, 2014
|
Affected line item in the consolidated statement of income
|
|||
$ | 692 |
Cost of revenues
|
||
17 |
Research and development
|
|||
67 |
Marketing and selling
|
|||
58 |
General and administrative
|
|||
$ | 834 |
|
x.
|
Capitalized software costs:
The Company follows the accounting guidance specified in ASC 350-40, “Internal-Use Software”. The Company capitalizes costs incurred in the acquisition or development of software for internal use, including the costs of the software, materials, and consultants incurred in developing internal-use computer software, once final selection of the software is made. Costs incurred prior to the final selection of software and costs not qualifying for capitalization are charged to expense. Capitalized software costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over it’s useful life.
|
|
y.
|
Impact of recently issued accounting standards
|
|
1.
|
In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued amended guidance related to disclosure of uncertainties about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The new guidance requires management to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and, as necessary, to provide related footnote disclosures. The guidance has an effective date of December 31, 2016. The Company believes that the adoption of this new standard will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
|
|
2.
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance on revenue from contracts with customers that will supersede most current revenue recognition guidance. The underlying principle is
that an entity will recognize revenue upon the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. Other major provisions include capitalization of certain
contract costs, consideration of the time value of money in the transaction price, and allowing estimates of variable consideration to be recognized before contingencies are resolved in certain circumstances. The guidance also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from an entity’s contracts with customers. The guidance is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016 (early adoption is not permitted). The guidance permits the use of either a retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect of the amended guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
|
NOTE 2:-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
y.
|
Impact of recently issued accounting standards (Cont.)
|
|
3.
|
In April 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance related to discontinued operations. The new guidance limits the presentation of discontinued operations to business circumstances when the disposal of the business operation represents a strategic shift that has had or will have a major effect on operations and financial results. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning January 1, 2015. The Company believes that the adoption of this new standard will not materially impact its consolidated financial statements.
|
NOTE 3:-
|
OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND PREPAID EXPENSES
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||
Prepaid expenses
|
$ | 2,296 | $ | 1,326 | ||||
Government authorities
|
5,765 | 6,825 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets
|
8,384 | 7,114 | ||||||
Advances to suppliers
|
2,480 | 3,726 | ||||||
Derivatives
|
2,479 | 2,353 | ||||||
Other
|
1,325 | 1,509 | ||||||
$ | 22,729 | $ | 22,853 |
NOTE 4:-
|
INVENTORIES
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||
Raw materials
|
$ | 15,439 | $ | 13,753 | ||||
Work-in-progress
|
726 | 1,047 | ||||||
Finished goods(*)
|
64,047 | 43,067 | ||||||
$ | 80,212 | $ | 57,867 |
December 31,
|
||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||
Cost:
|
||||||||
Machinery and manufacturing equipment, net(1)
|
$ | 173,937 | $ | 124,728 | ||||
Office equipment and furniture
|
8,633 | 7,868 | ||||||
Motor vehicles
|
948 | 1,565 | ||||||
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
77,281 | 35,686 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses related to operating lease(2)
|
939 | 939 | ||||||
261,738 | 170,786 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation
|
88,745 | 77,152 | ||||||
Depreciated cost
|
$ | 172,993 | $ | 93,634 |
(1)
|
Presented net of investment grant received in 2004, 2005 and 2006 years, in the total amount of $7,200.
|
(2)
|
The Company leases land from the Israel Lands Administration ("ILA") for its Bar-Lev manufacturing facility. The lease term started on February 6, 2005. The lease is for an initial non-cancellable term of 49 years, with a renewal option of an additional 49 years. The Company analyzed the conditions set forth in ASC 840-10 and classified the land as an operating lease (since the land is not transferred to the Company at the end of the lease nor is there any option to buy the land from the ILA at any point). All payments on account of the initial term were paid in advance (based on discounted values) at the beginning of the lease, and included in the minimum lease payments to be amortized. The prepaid expenses are amortized through the term of the lease, based on the straight-line method (including the bargain renewal option term).
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||
Original amounts:
|
||||||||
Non-compete agreement
|
$ | 1,672 | $ | 1,817 | ||||
Distribution relationships
|
1,698 | 1,785 | ||||||
Customer relationships
|
6,588 | 6,953 | ||||||
Distribution agreement
|
14,616 | 14,616 | ||||||
24,574 | 25,171 | |||||||
Accumulated amortization:
|
||||||||
Non-compete agreement
|
(1,646 | ) | (1,780 | ) | ||||
Distribution relationships
|
(1,311 | ) | (1,301 | ) | ||||
Customer relationships
|
(4,458 | ) | (3,512 | ) | ||||
Distribution agreement
|
(7,100 | ) | (5,206 | ) | ||||
(14,515 | ) | (11,799 | ) | |||||
Total other intangible assets
|
$ | 10,059 | $ | 13,372 |
|
(1)
|
Amortization expense amounted to $3,202, $3,368 and $3,824 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
Estimated amortization expenses for the following years as of December 31, 2014:
|
2015
|
$ | 3,104 | ||
2016
|
2,412 | |||
2017
|
2,305 | |||
2018
|
2,238 | |||
$ | 10,059 |
Balance as of December 31, 2012
|
$ | 42,955 | ||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(3,253 | ) | ||
Balance as of December 31, 2013
|
$ | 39,702 | ||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(1,742 | ) | ||
Balance as of December 31, 2014
|
$ | 37,960 |
NOTE 8:-
|
SHORT-TERM BANK CREDIT AND LOANS
|
|
a.
|
Short-term bank credit and loans are classified as follows:
|
Weighted average interest
|
|||||||||||||||||
Currency
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||||||||
%
|
|||||||||||||||||
Short-term bank credit
|
CAD
|
- | 3.25 | $ | - | $ | 5,454 |
|
b.
|
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had short-term and revolving credit lines of approximately $9,863 and $10,655, respectively, from Israeli, Canadian and Australian banks. The Company's current credit lines, if not extended, will expire in December, 2015 in Israeli and Australian banks and in July, 2015 in Canadian banks.
|
NOTE 9:-
|
ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||
Employees and payroll accruals
|
$ | 10,582 | $ | 9,652 | ||||
Accrued expenses
|
7,394 | 6,043 | ||||||
Advances from customers
|
42 | 1,405 | ||||||
Taxes payable
|
1,915 | 2,435 | ||||||
Warranty provision
|
1,475 | 920 | ||||||
Derivatives
|
2,900 | 64 | ||||||
Phantom share based payment
|
750 | - | ||||||
Other
|
716 | 371 | ||||||
$ | 25,774 | $ | 20,890 |
NOTE 11:-
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
|
|
a.
|
Legal proceedings and contingencies:
|
|
1.
|
In December 2007, the Company terminated its agency agreement with its former South African agent, World of Marble and Granite (“WOMAG”), on the basis that it had breached the agreement. In the same month, the Company filed a claim for NIS 1.0 million (approximately $257) in the Israeli District Court in Haifa based on such breach. WOMAG has contested jurisdiction of the Israeli District Court, but subsequent appellate courts have dismissed WOMAG’s contest. In January 2008, WOMAG filed suit in South Africa seeking EURO 15.7 million (approximately $19,060). In September 2013, the South African Court determined that since a proceeding on the same facts was pending before another court (lis alibis pendens), the South African Court will stay the matter until the conclusion of the Israeli action. In December 2013, the magistrate’s court in Israel held that the Company was not entitled to terminate the agreement with WOMAG as it was not breached by WOMAG. The Company has filed an appeal on this judgment to the district court, which was denied by the court during 2014. The case in the South African Court will be set for trial. Although the Company intends to vigorously defend the case in the South African court, the Company believes it provided an adequate reserve for this claim.
|
|
|
2.
|
The Company is subject to a number of claims in Israel mainly by fabricators or their employees alleging that they contracted illnesses, including silicosis, through exposure to silica particles during cutting, polishing, sawing, grinding, breaking, crushing, drilling, sanding or sculpting Company's products.
Individual Claims
The Company is subject to 60 pending claims of bodily injury that have been filed against it directly since 2008 in Israel or that have named the Company as third-party defendant by fabricators or their employees in Israel (one in 2008, two in 2009, four in 2010, six in 2011, six in 2012, eight in 2013 and 33 in 2014 through March 11, 2015). The Company have also received ten letters threatening to file claims on behalf of certain fabricators in Israel or their employees in Israel alleging that they contracted illnesses as a result of fabricating Company's products. Each of the claims named other defendants, such as fabricators that employed the plaintiffs, the Israeli Ministry of Industry, Trade and Employment, distributors of the Company's products and insurance companies. The pending claims include one lawsuit filed with a petition to be recognized as class action, one lawsuit filed by three stone fabricators together and one appeal which was filed in connection with a judgment granted in one of the lawsuits (as further detailed below). In addition, one claim was filed by the Israeli National Insurance Institution ("NII") for subrogation of compensation paid by the NII to certain fabricators who allegedly contracted silicosis. Various arguments are raised in the claims, including among others product liability arguments and failure to provide warnings regarding the risks associated with silica dust generated by the fabrication of the Company's products.
|
NOTE 11:-
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)
|
|
a.
|
Legal proceedings and contingencies:
|
|
2.
|
(Cont.)
Most of the claims do not specify a total amount of damages sought, as the plaintiff’s future damages will be determined at trial; however, damages totaling approximately $12,120 million are specified in certain of the claims currently pending against the Company in Israel. A claim filed with the Magistrates court in Israel is limited to a maximum of NIS 2.5 million (approximately $643) plus any fees, and among the 60 claims filed against the Company in Israel, 35 claims were filed in the Magistrates court. A claim filed in the District court is not subject to such limitation. As a result, there is uncertainty regarding the total amount of damages that may ultimately be claimed.
In addition in Israel, as well as in some other jurisdictions, defendants are liable jointly and severally towards the plaintiff. In cases where several defendants are found as liable, the plaintiff is entitled to collect all his damages from one of the liable defendants only. If the Company is found partially liable to a plaintiff's damages, the plaintiff may seek to collect all his damages from the Company; In such cases, the Company shall have to act for collecting the damages attributable to other defendants from them, and if such defendants are insolvent or the Company is unsuccessful in collecting their portion of the damages for any other reason, the Company may incur damages beyond the damages the Company is liable for.
The Company intend to vigorously contest pending claims against it and potential claims, although there can be no assurance that the Company will succeed in these claims and there is a reasonable possibility that the Company will be liable for damages in such lawsuits. Currently the Company estimates its reasonably possible exposure with respect to 47 lawsuits out of the total 60 pending law suits to be approximately $12,120, although the actual result of such lawsuits may significantly vary from such estimate. As the Company currently assessed, also based on its legal advisors opinion, that contingent losses related to the silicossis proceedings are only reasonably possible, pursuant to ASC 450, an accrual has not been recorded for the loss contingencies.
|
NOTE 11:-
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)
|
|
a.
|
Legal proceedings and contingencies (Cont.):
|
|
2.
|
(Cont.)
December 2013 Judgment
In December 2013, a judgment was entered by the Central District Court of Israel in one of the law suits, according to which the Company was found to be comparatively liable for 33% of the plaintiff's total damages. The remaining liability was imposed on the plaintiff at 40%, as contributory negligence, and on the Israeli Ministry of Industry at 27%. The total damages of the plaintiff were found by the court to be NIS 5.3 million (approximately $1,400). Since the plaintiff received payments from the NII, such payments were subtracted from the total damages after reduction of the damages contributed to the plaintiff's contributory negligence. However, under Israeli law, under certain condition a plaintiff may be awarded as compensation from third party injurers, other than his employer, at least 25% of the damages claimed even if the payments that the plaintiff received from the NII equal to or exceed the actual damages of the plaintiff after deducting his contributory liability. Accordingly, in the above claim, the court awarded the plaintiff additional compensation of approximately NIS 800,000 (approximately $206) plus legal fees and expenses, which reflected 25% of the plaintiff actual damages, after deducting the plaintiff's contributory negligence and the amount of NIS 3.3 million (approximately $850) to which the claimant is entitled from the NII. After giving effect to the Israeli Ministry of Industry’s comparative responsibility, the total liability imposed on the Company in this case was NIS 436,669 (approximately $112) plus the claimant’s legal expenses. Such amount was fully paid by Company's insurer in January 2014 (apart from Company's deductible). The Company, as well as the Israeli Ministry of Industry and the plaintiff, appealed on the judgment to the Israeli Supreme Court. Although the December 2013 judgement was entered, under the Israeli law, a District Court judgment does not consist a precedence binding upon other courts in Israel. There is no assurance whether the Company or any of the other appellant shall succeed in the appeals.
|
NOTE 11:-
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)
|
|
a.
|
Legal proceedings and contingencies (Cont.):
|
|
2.
|
(Cont.)
Claim by Former Employee
One of the fabricators who filed a claim against the Company was employed by the Company in the past and claimed that his illness was, in part, the result of his employment with the Company. Although there can be no assurance that the Company will succeed in such claim, the Company believe that his illness is not related to his employment by the Company and intends to vigorously defend itself.
Settled Claim
The Company was also a party to a two settlement agreements that had been approved by a court with respect to two of the claims filed. In the first case, the total settlement was for NIS 275,000 (approximately $71) of which the Company had agreed to pay NIS 10,000 (approximately $3) without admitting liability. Substantially all of the balance was payable by the fabricator that employed the individual in question and insurance companies. In the second case, the total settlement was for NIS 130,000 (approximately $33) of which the Company agreed to pay NIS 80,000 (approximately $21). The balance was payable by the owners of the fabrication factory in which the deceased plaintiff was working. According to the settlement agreement, the parties' obligations are separated and neither party will be liable to the other parties' obligations under the agreement.
Class Action
In April 27, 2014, a lawsuit by single plaintiff and a motion for the recognition of this lawsuit as a class action was filed against the Company in the Central District Court in Israel. The plaintiff alleges that, if the lawsuit is recognized as a class action, the claim against the Company is estimated to be NIS 216 million (approximately $56,000). In addition, the claim includes an unstated sum in compensation for special and general damages.
The Company intends to vigorously contest recognition of the lawsuit as a class action and to defend the lawsuit on its merits, although, considering the preliminary stage of this lawsuit, there can be no assurance as to the probability of success or the range of potential exposure, if any.
|
NOTE 11:-
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)
|
|
a.
|
Legal proceedings and contingencies (Cont.):
|
|
3.
|
In November 2011, Kfar Giladi Quarries Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd., or Kfar Giladi Quarries, and Microgil Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd., or Microgil, an entity the Company believes is controlled by Kfar Giladi Quarries (Microgil and Kfar Giladi Quarries together shall be referred to as "Kfar Giladi"), initiated arbitration proceedings against the Company.
On April 15, 2012, Kfar Giladi Quarries filed a complaint with the arbitrator against the Company seeking damages of NIS 232.8 million (approximately $59,861) for breach of the agreement between the parties dated June 13, 2006. During August 2012, the Company filed with the arbitrator a legal claim against Microgil and Kfar Giladi Quarries for NIS 76.6 million (approximately $19,697). During the arbitration the Company found out that the claimants took illegal actions in order to obtain evidence. The Company considered these actions to be a breach of the arbitration clause and accordingly, in January 2014, the Company gave the claimants a notice of the arbitration's cancellation. The Company also submitted a claim to the district court seeking a declarative judgment that the arbitration’s cancellation was lawful and asked the court to stay the arbitration process until the Company's claim to the district court is adjudicated. In turn, the claimants filed a counter motion to the court asking to stay the Court proceedings. In April 2014, the court accepted the claimants' motions to stay Court proceedings and ordered the arbitrator to proceed with the arbitration process. The Company filed a leave to appeal to the supreme court of the State of Israel and at the same the arbitration process is being conducted.
The arbitration arises out of a dispute related to the quartz processing agreement (the "Processing Agreement") that the Company entered into with Kfar Giladi in June 2006 pursuant to which Kfar Giladi committed to establish a production facility at its own expense within 21 months of the date of the Processing Agreement to process quartz for the Company and for other potential customers. Pursuant to the terms of the Processing Agreement, the Company committed to pay fixed prices for quartz processing services related to agreed upon quantities of quartz over a period of ten years from the date set for Kfar Giladi to commence operating the production facility.
The Company estimated that the total amount of such payments would have been approximately $55,000. It is the Company's position that the production facility established by Kfar Giladi was not operational until approximately two years after the date required by the Processing Agreement. As a result, the Company was unable to purchase the minimum quantities set forth in the Processing Agreement and the Company therefore acquired the quantities of ground quartz that it needed from other quartz suppliers.
|
|
NOTE 11:-
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)
|
|
a.
|
Legal proceedings and contingencies (Cont.):
|
|
3.
|
(Cont.)
It is also the Company's position, which is disputed by the claimants, that the Processing Agreement was terminated by the Company following its breach by Kfar Giladi. The Company contends that the Company's purchases of ground quartz from Kfar Giladi in 2010 and 2011 were made pursuant to new understandings reached between the parties and not pursuant to the Processing Agreement. Kfar Giladi alleges that the Processing Agreement was still in effect and that the Company did not meet its contractual commitments under the Processing Agreement to order the minimum annual quantity. In addition, once production began, the Company contends that Kfar Giladi failed to consistently deliver the required quantity and quality of ground quartz as agreed by the parties. The Company's positions are disputed by Kfar Giladi.
The Company also contends that Kfar Giladi is responsible for not returning to the Company unprocessed quartz that it provided to them, including quartz that is currently in Kfar Giladi's possession and additional quartz that is unaccounted for. Each party has various other claims against the other. After Kfar Giladi filed its affidavits in the arbitration, the Company learned that it took illegal actions in order to obtain evidence. The Company considers these actions as a breach of the arbitration clause and accordingly informed Kfar Giladi that the arbitration is cancelled. The Company submitted a claim to the court seeking a declarative judgment that the arbitration's cancellation was lawful. The Company also submitted a motion to the court asking to stay the arbitration until its said claim is adjudicated. The Company believes that it was entitled to cancel the arbitration under the abovementioned circumstances, but its position in this matter is disputed by Kfar Giladi and there is no assurance that the Company will succeed in the claim or the application.
In January 2012, Kfar Giladi notified the Company that it had closed its production facility as a result of the Company's breach of the Processing Agreement, although the Company was willing to keep purchasing products from Kfar Giladi.
The Company intends to defend the arbitration vigorously and to seek damages from Microgil for damage caused to it. However, there is no assurance that an adverse ruling or a negative outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the Company. Considering the preliminary stage of the proceedings, the Company cannot estimate the related risk in this lawsuit.
|
|
4.
|
From time to time, the Company faces environmental compliance issues related to the Company's two manufacturing facilities in Israel. At present, the Company is considering remedial steps to address issues related to the following:
|
NOTE 11:-
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)
|
|
a.
|
Legal proceedings and contingencies (Cont.):
|
|
4.
|
(Cont.)
In January 2010, the Israel Ministry of the Environment ("IMPE") ordered the Company to remove sludge waste that was disposed of in 2009 in a number of locations in northern Israel claiming that such disposal was unlawful. The Company has engaged in discussions with the IMPE with respect to which sites will require waste removal. The Company performed a feasible and practical clean-up project but have yet to receive any acknowledgement by the IMPE that no further actions are necessary in relation with such sludge. In addition in May 2014 after reexamining Company's sludge, the IMPE decided to classify Company's sludge as solid industrial waste. Such reclassification results in the need to dispose the waste at different disposal sites, which involves much higher expenses compared to Company's previous disposal costs. As of December 31, 2014, the Company reserved of approximately $747, which it believes to be adequate for anticipated future clean-up expenditures if required by the IMPE.
The Company has been required by the IMPE to comply with the applicable requirements under the law and regulations related to styrene gas emission at both of its plants in Israel.
In December 2013, the Company completed the installation of a system in its Bar-Lev manufacturing facility to reduce styrene emission and following which the Company has better control of the styrene emission in the Bar-Lev manufacturing facility and the Company presented to IMPE a plan to further improve our control of styrene emission and comply with the styrene gas emission standards With respect to the Sdot-Yam manufacturing facility the IMPE has summoned the Company in January 2014 toa hearing to address allegations that, based on the IMPE’s procurement of several gas emission samplings, the Company exceeded the air ambient standards. Following the hearing, and although the IMPE acknowledged that the Company was in the process of installing measures to comply with the styrene gas emission standards, the IMPE decided to recommend the conducting of investigation with respect to the allegation that the Company exceeded from the threshold of styrene air ambient standards during 2013. During 2014, applied measures to correct the styrene air ambient standards which the Company believe should conclusively solve any exceeded emission of styrene gas. Company’s constant controlling of styrene emission levels requires strict maintenance and compliance with work processes.
|
|
5.
|
From time to time, the Company is involved in other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business related to a range of matters. While the outcome of these other claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company's management does not believe that any such claims or all of them together will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
|
NOTE 11:-
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)
|
|
a.
|
Legal proceedings and contingencies (Cont.):
|
|
6.
|
Legal Procedure and a hearing by the Israeli Ministry of Economy with and respect to Israeli Hours of Work and Rest Law, 1951 and the employment of Jewish employees on Saturdays
The Company is subject to the Israeli Hours of Work and Rest Law, 1951 ("Rest Law"), which forbids the employment of Jewish employees on Saturdays and Jewish holidays, unless a permit is obtained from the Israeli Ministry of Economy. Company's employees, including Jewish and other employees, work in three shifts a day of an average length of eight hours each, seven days a week. The Company currently does not have a permit for the employment of Jewish employees on Saturdays and Jewish holidays. Such employment of Jewish employees on Saturdays and Jewish holidays without a permit constitutes infringement of the Rest Law. Although there is no assurance that the Company shall be able to obtain a permit to employ Jewish employees on Saturdays and Jewish holidays, the Company have recently submitted an application with the Israeli Ministry of Economy for such permit. On September 20, 2014, an inspection of the Israeli Ministry of Economy in our Bar-Lev manufacturing facility has found three Jewish employees employed on a Saturday. Following this inspection the Company was summoned to a hearing by the Israeli Ministry of Economy. A decision with respect to the hearing was not yet resolved. Concurrently, the Company is in the process of implementing certain operational steps and change in our headcount in order to comply with the Rest Law over time. If the Company is unable to obtain a permit to employ Jewish on Saturdays and Jewish holidays and the Company is unsuccessful in employing only non-Jewish employees on Saturdays, the Company may be compelled to cease operation or partially operate its plants in Israel during Saturdays and Jewish holidays, and as a result, the Company may have less production capacity which could materially adversely affect its revenues and profitability. In addition, the Company and its officers may be exposed to administrative and criminal liabilities, including fines.
|
|
NOTE 11:-
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)
|
|
b.
|
Operating lease commitments:
|
2015
|
$ | 11,487 | ||
2016
|
9,829 | |||
2017
|
8,534 | |||
2018
|
7,225 | |||
2019
|
6,465 | |||
2020 and thereafter
|
50,685 | |||
Total
|
$ | 94,225 |
|
c.
|
Purchase obligation:
|
2015 (1)
|
$ | 27,062 | ||
2016 and thereafter
|
- | |||
$ | 27,062 |
|
(1)
|
Consists of purchase obligations to certain suppliers.
|
|
d.
|
Pledges and guarantees:
|
|
1.
|
As of December 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding guarantees and letters of credit with various expiration dates in a principal amount of approximately $23,797, of which approximately $22,766 related to the establishment of the production lines in Caesarstone Technologies, Inc. and the remaining amount related to facilities, vehicle leases and other miscellaneous guarantees.
|
|
2.
|
Company's credit facilities provided by banks in Israel are secured with a “Negative floating pledge”, whereby the Company committed not to pledge or charge and not to undertake to pledge or charge its general floating assets.
|
|
3.
|
To secure the Company's liabilities to a bank in Canada, Caesarstone Canada Inc. has provided a security interest on certain of its inventory and other tangible and intangible assets.
|
NOTE 12:-
|
TAXES ON INCOME
|
|
a.
|
Uncertain tax positions:
|
Gross tax liabilities at January 1, 2012
|
$ | 755 | ||
Increases in tax positions for current year
|
177 | |||
Addition of tax position of prior years
|
167 | |||
Foreign currency adjustments
|
(15 | ) | ||
Gross tax liabilities at December 31, 2012
|
1,084 | |||
Increases in tax positions for current year
|
151 | |||
Addition of tax position of prior years
|
68 | |||
Foreign currency adjustments
|
92 | |||
Gross tax liabilities at December 31, 2013
|
1,395 | |||
Increases in tax positions for current year
|
- | |||
Addition of tax position of prior years
|
146 | |||
Decrease in tax position resulting from settlement
|
(1,076 | ) | ||
Foreign currency adjustments
|
(48 | ) | ||
Gross tax liabilities at December 31, 2014
|
$ | 417 |
NOTE 12:-
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
a.
|
Uncertain tax positions (Cont.):
The Company operates in multiple jurisdictions throughout the world, and its tax returns are periodically audited or subject to review by both domestic and foreign authorities. The associated tax filings remain subject to examination by applicable tax authorities for a certain length of time following the tax year to which those filings relate. The following describes the open tax years, by major tax jurisdiction, as of December 31, 2014:
|
|
b.
|
Israeli taxation:
|
|
1.
|
Corporate tax rate:
The corporate tax rate in Israel is 26.5% in 2014 and was 25% in 2013 and 2012.
|
|
2.
|
Foreign Exchange Regulations:
Commencing in taxable year 2014, the Company has elected to measure its taxable income and file its tax return under the Israeli Income Foreign Tax Regulations. Under the Foreign Exchange Regulations, an Israeli company must calculate its tax liability in U.S. Dollars according to certain orders and than translated into NIS according to the exchange rate as of December 31st of each year. For taxable years up to 2013, the Company measured its taxable income and filed its tax returns in NIS.
|
|
3.
|
Tax benefits under Israel's Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 1969:
The Company is an "Industrial Company," as defined by the Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 1969, and as such, the Company is entitled to certain tax benefits, primarily amortization of costs relating to know-how and patents over eight years, accelerated depreciation and the right to deduct public issuance expenses for tax purposes.
|
NOTE 12:-
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
b.
|
Israeli taxation (Cont.):
|
|
3.
|
Tax benefits under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959:
According to the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (the "Encouragement Law"), the Company is entitled to various tax benefits by virtue of the "Preferred Enterprise" status granted to its enterprises, in accordance with the Encouragement Law.
As further described below, the Company chose to be taxed according to the "Preferred Enterprise" track under Amendment No. 68 to the Encouragement Law (the "Amendment No. 68") starting in the 2011 tax year. In order to implement Amendment No. 68 and to be taxed under the "Preferred Enterprise" track, starting from January, 1, 2011, the Company waived the tax benefits of the previous tracks -"Approved Enterprise" and "Beneficiary Enterprise" - under the Encouragement Law, starting from the 2011 tax year.
The principal benefits by virtue of the Encouragement Law are the following:
|
|
1.
|
Its main field of activity is biotechnology or nanotechnology as approved by the Head of the Administration of Industrial Research and Development.
|
|
2.
|
The industrial enterprise's sales revenues in a specific market during the tax year do not exceed 75% of its total sales for that tax year. A "market" is defined as a separate country or customs territory.
|
|
3.
|
At least 25% of the industrial enterprise's overall revenues during the tax year were generated from the enterprise's sales in a specific market with a population of at least 12 million, and starting from 2012 tax year, a population of at least 14 million.
|
NOTE 12:-
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
b.
|
Israeli taxation (Cont.):
|
NOTE 12:-
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
b.
|
Israeli taxation (Cont.):
|
NOTE 12:-
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
b.
|
Israeli taxation (Cont.):
|
NOTE 12:-
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
c.
|
Non-Israeli subsidiaries taxation:
|
|
d.
|
Deferred income taxes:
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||
Deferred tax assets:
|
||||||||
Intangible assets
|
$ | 110 | $ | 127 | ||||
Other temporary differences (1)
|
5,636 | 5,404 | ||||||
Temporary differences related to inventory
|
637 | 1,535 | ||||||
Phantom award
|
53 | - | ||||||
Unrealized profit from sales to subsidiary
|
3,355 | 1,910 | ||||||
Less-valuation allowance
|
(331 | ) | (397 | ) | ||||
Total net deferred tax assets
|
9,460 | 8,579 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities
|
||||||||
Property and equipment
|
(3,081 | ) | (4,030 | ) | ||||
Intangible assets
|
(2,910 | ) | (3,657 | ) | ||||
Other temporary differences
|
(20 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
(6,011 | ) | (7,710 | ) | ||||
Deferred tax assets, net
|
$ | 3,449 | $ | 869 |
|
(1)
|
Deriving mainly from the following - provision for bad debts, labor provisions, warranty provision and related party liability for tax purposes.
|
NOTE 12:-
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
d.
|
Deferred income taxes (Cont.):
|
|
e.
|
A reconciliation of the Company's effective tax rate to the statutory tax rate in Israel is as follows:
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Income before taxes on income
|
$ | 93,997 | $ | 74,689 | $ | 47,188 | ||||||
Statutory tax rate in Israel
|
26.5 | % | 25 | % | 25 | % | ||||||
Income taxes at statutory rate
|
$ | 24,909 | $ | 18,672 | $ | 11,797 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in tax expenses resulting from:
|
||||||||||||
Tax benefit arising from reduced rate as an "Approved Enterprise"
|
(12,482 | ) | ( 11,267 | ) | (7,192 | ) | ||||||
Non-deductible expenses, net
|
856 | 1,274 | 1,025 | |||||||||
Adjustment for change in tax law
|
- | 575 | - | |||||||||
Decrease in taxes resulting from tax settlement with tax authorities
|
(286 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Tax adjustment in respect of foreign subsidiaries' different tax rates
|
634 | 741 | 558 | |||||||||
Uncertain tax liability (ASC 740)
|
146 | 219 | 344 | |||||||||
Changes in valuation allowance
|
(66 | ) | 97 | 211 | ||||||||
Others
|
27 | 25 | 78 | |||||||||
Income tax expense
|
$ | 13,738 | $ | 10,336 | $ | 6,821 | ||||||
Effective tax rate
|
15 | % | 14 | % | 14 | % | ||||||
Per share amounts (basic) of the tax benefit resulting from an "Approved Enterprise"
|
$ | (0.36 | ) | $ | (0.32 | ) | $ | (0.22 | ) | |||
Per share amounts (diluted) of the tax benefit resulting from an "Approved Enterprise"
|
$ | (0.35 | ) | $ | (0.32 | ) | $ | (0.22 | ) |
NOTE 12:-
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
f.
|
Income before taxes on income is comprised as follows:
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Domestic
|
$ | 82,670 | $ | 65,657 | $ | 40,691 | ||||||
Foreign
|
11,327 | 9,032 | 6,497 | |||||||||
$ | 93,997 | $ | 74,689 | $ | 47,188 |
|
g.
|
Tax expenses on income are comprised as follows:
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Current taxes
|
$ | 16,318 | $ | 10,119 | $ | 8,742 | ||||||
Deferred taxes
|
(2,580 | ) | 217 | (1,921 | ) | |||||||
$ | 13,738 | $ | 10,336 | $ | 6,821 | |||||||
Domestic
|
$ | 9,646 | $ |
6,395
|
$ | 4,930 | ||||||
Foreign
|
4,092 | 3,941 | 1,891 | |||||||||
$ | 13,738 | $ | 10,336 | $ | 6,821 |
NOTE 13:-
|
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
a.
|
The Company's share capital consisted of the following as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:
|
Authorized
|
Issued and outstanding
|
|||||||||||||||
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||||||
Shares of NIS 0.04 par value:
|
||||||||||||||||
Ordinary shares
|
200,000,000 | 200,000,000 | 35,132,127 | 34,739,315 |
|
b.
|
Ordinary shares-ordinary shares confer on their holders voting rights and the right to receive dividends.
|
NOTE 13:-
|
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Cont.)
|
|
c.
|
On March 21, 2012, the Company filed a final prospectus with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in connection with its initial public offering in the United States and listing on NASDAQ of 7,659,000 ordinary shares in consideration for $84,200. After deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and the offering expenses, the net proceeds from the offering amounted to $75,422. The number of shares offered included the underwriters’ option to purchase an additional 999,000 shares at the offering price that was exercised on March 28, 2012.
|
|
d.
|
Dividends:
The Company paid dividends in the amount of $20,025, $20,149 and $27,182, in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, out of non-tax exempt profit under the Approved Enterprise, beneficiary enterprise and preferred enterprize.
|
|
e.
|
Compensation plan:
On January 1, 2011, the Board of Directors adopted the Caesarstone Sdot-Yam 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan pursuant to which non-employee directors, officers, employees and consultants
may receive stock options exercisable for ordinary shares, if certain conditions are met. As of December 31, 2014, there were 401,543 options outstanding under the plan and 1,206,580 shares available or reserved for future issuance under the plan.
As of December 31, 2014, there was $447 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted to employees under the Company's stock option plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.68 years.
The following is a summary of activities relating to the Company’s stock options granted to employees among the Company’s plan during the year ended December 31, 2014:
|
Number
of
options
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
Aggregate intrinsic value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding - beginning of the year
|
895,552 | $ | 10.58 | $ | 44,097 | |||||||
Granted
|
- | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||
Exercised
|
489,102 | $ | 10.52 | $ | 20,877 | |||||||
Forfeited
|
5,155 | $ | 9.85 | $ | 258 | |||||||
Outstanding - end of the year
|
401,295 | $ | 10.09 | $ | 19,956 | |||||||
Options exercisable at the end of the year
|
3,350 | $ | 9.85 | $ | 167 | |||||||
Vested and expected to vest
|
401,295 | $ | 10.09 | $ | 19,956 |
NOTE 13:-
|
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Cont.)
|
|
e.
|
Compensation plan (Cont.):
|
Options outstanding
|
Options exercisable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise price
|
Number
of
options
|
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life (years)
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
per share
|
Number
of
options
|
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life (years)
|
Weighted
average
exercise price
|
|||||||||||||||||||
$ 9.85 | 381,295 | 4.22 | $ | 9.85 | 3,350 | 4.22 | 9.85 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ 14.69 | 20,000 | 4.85 | $ | 14.69 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
401,295 | - | - | - |
December 31,
|
||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||
Cost of revenues
|
$ | 75 | $ | 149 | ||||
Research
and development expenses
|
52 | 35 | ||||||
Selling and marketing expenses
|
210 | 384 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses
|
875 | 1,946 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,212 | $ | 2,514 |
NOTE 14:-
|
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
|
|
a.
|
Manpower Agreement with Kibbutz:
|
b.
|
Services from the Kibbutz:
|
NOTE 14:-
|
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES (Cont.)
|
|
b.
|
Services from the Kibbutz (cont.):
Under the new services agreement, Kibbutz Sdot-Yam will provide the Company, among other things, with sewage infrastructure services, water supply, meals, laundry, post-delivery and other services, that Kibbutz Sdot-Yam will be granted the first refusal right for their supply to the Company, under terms that the Company may obtain from third parties. The amount that the Company will pay to the Kibbutz will generally be determined based on the amount of services the Company consumes. The amount the Company pays for services will be subject to adjustment every six months for increases in the Israeli consumer price index.
The Company's service fees to the Kibbutz pursuant to the services agreement totaled $2,118, $2,112 and $ 2,113 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
|
|
c.
|
Management Services Agreement with the Kibbutz:
Pursuant to a management services agreement entered into on December 25, 2006, the Kibbutz provides the Company with management services, including, without limitation, strategic, operational and technical advisory services and directorship services, and the Company agreed to pay the Kibbutz a management fee of NIS 1.2 million linked to the Israeli consumer price index from December 2006 plus 7.2% of the Company's annual pre-tax net income before payment of the management fee. The management services agreement was terminated immediately upon the closing of the IPO.
The Company's management service fees to the Kibbutz pursuant to the management services agreement totaled $0, $0 and $477 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
|
|
d.
|
Land Use Agreement with the Kibbutz:
The Company's principal offices and research and development facilities, as well as one of its two manufacturing facilities, are located on the grounds of the Kibbutz and include buildings spaces of approximately 31,644 square meters and unbuilt areas of approximately 55,207 square meters.
The Company signed on July 20, 2011 and amended on February 13, 2012 a land use agreement with the Kibbutz, which has a term of 20 years commencing on April 1, 2012. Under the land use agreement, Kibbutz Sdot-Yam permits the Company to use approximately 100,000 square meters of land, consisting of facilities and unbuilt areas, in consideration for an annual fee of NIS 12.6 million (approximately $3,400) in 2012 and NIS 12.9 million (approximately $3,500) in 2013, (each of these amounts do not include approximately NIS 62,000 (approximately $18) for an additional area that the Company has leased on the grounds of Kibbutz Sdot-Yam due to the Company's needs and Kibbutz Sdot-Yam's consent under the same terms as the land use agreement), in each case plus VAT, and beginning in 2013, adjusted every six months based on any increase of the Israeli consumer price index compared to the index as of January 2011.
|
NOTE 14:-
|
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES (Cont.)
|
|
d.
|
Land Use Agreement with the Kibbutz (cont.):
Pursuant to an agreement dated January 4, 2012, for the settlement of reimbursement for building expenses incurred by the Company from January 2012, NIS 82,900 (approximately $24) and NIS 43,000 (approximately $12) will not be included in the land use fees until the year 2020 and year 2015, respectively.
The annual fee may be adjusted after January 1, 2021 (or after January 1, 2018 if the Kibbutz is required to pay significantly higher lease fees to the ILA or the Edmond Benjamin de Rothschild Caesarea Development Corporation Ltd.) and every three years thereafter, if Kibbutz Sdot-Yam chooses to obtain an appraisal. The appraiser will be mutually agreed upon or, in the absence of agreement, will be chosen by Kibbutz Sdot-Yam out of the list of appraisers recommended at that time by Bank Leumi Le-Israeli ("Bank Leumi"). Under the land use agreement, the Company may not terminate the operation of either of its two production lines at its plant in Kibbutz Sdot-Yam as long as the Company continues to operate production lines elsewhere in Israel, and its headquarters must remain at Kibbutz Sdot-Yam. The Company may also not decrease or return to Kibbutz Sdot-Yam any part of the land underlying the land use agreement; however, it may submit a written request to Kibbutz Sdot-Yam to return certain lands. Kibbutz Sdot-Yam will have three months to accept or reject such request, in its sole discretion, provided that if it does not respond within such three-month period, the Company will be entitled to sublease such lands to a person approved in advance by Kibbutz Sdot-Yam. In such event, the Company will continue to be liable to Kibbutz Sdot-Yam with respect to such lands.
Pursuant to the land use agreement, if the Company needs additional facilities on the land that the Company is permitted to use in Kibbutz Sdot-Yam, subject to obtaining the permits required by law, Kibbutz Sdot-Yam will build such facilities for the Company, by using the proceeds of a loan that the Company will make to Kibbutz Sdot-Yam, which loan shall be repaid to the Company by off-setting the monthly additional payment that the Company will pay for such new facilities and, if not fully repaid during the land use agreement term, upon termination thereof.
|
NOTE 14:-
|
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES (Cont.)
|
|
d.
|
Land Use Agreement with the Kibbutz (cont.):
In addition, the Company has committed to fund the cost of construction, up to a maximum of NIS 3.3 million (approximately $800) plus VAT, required to change the access road
leading to Kibbutz Sdot-Yam and its facilities, such that the entrance of the Company's facilities will be separated from the entrance into Kibbutz Sdot-Yam. In addition, the Company has committed to pay NIS 200,000 (approximately $51) plus VAT to cover the cost of paving an area of land leased from Kibbutz Sdot-Yam with such payment to be deducted in monthly installments over a four-year period beginning in 2013 from the lease payments to be made to Kibbutz Sdot-Yam under the land use agreement related to the Company's Sdot-Yam facility.
Starting from January 1, 2014, the Company is making use, per the Company's needs, of additional offices area in Kibbutz Sdot-Yam of approximately 400 sqm, for fees which amount to NIS 77,956 (approximately $20). Such additional area shall be used by the Company as long as the Company needs it and not later than the end of the land use agreement.
Pursuant to the land use agreement signed on July 20, 2011 and amended on February 13, 2012 with Kibbutz Sdot-Yam that became effective in March 2012 and expires in October 2017, if the Company wishes to acquire or lease any additional lands, whether on the grounds of the Company's Bar-Lev manufacturing facility, or elsewhere in Israel, for the purpose of establishing new plants or production lines: (i) Kibbutz Sdot-Yam will purchase the land and build the required facilities’ structure on such land at its own expense in accordance with the Company's needs; (ii) the Company will perform any necessary building adjustments at the Company's expense; and (iii) Kibbutz Sdot-Yam will lease the land and the facility to the Company under a long-term lease agreement with terms to be negotiated in accordance with the then prevailing market price. As a result, the Company depends on Kibbutz Sdot-Yam to act in connection with the expansion of the Company's facilities. The Company may also incur greater costs associated with the purchase of additional land or the construction of additional facilities than it could obtain from a third-party due to its arrangement with Kibbutz Sdot-Yam. In addition, under this agreement, Kibbutz Sdot-Yam has agreed not to compete with the Company as long as it holds more than 10% of the Company's shares.
Pursuant to the above agreement, the Company has entered into an agreement with Kibbutz Sdot-Yam dated August 6, 2013, under which Kibbutz Sdot-Yam acquired additional land of approximately 12,800 on the grounds near the Company's Bar-Lev facility, which the Company required in connection with the construction of the fifth production line at the Company's Bar-Lev manufacturing facility, leased it to the Company at market value. Under the agreement, Kibbutz Sdot-Yam committed to (i) acquire the long-term leasing rights of the Additional Bar-Lev Land from the ILA, (ii) acquire all permits and approvals required for performing the preparation work of the Additional Bar-Lev Land and for the building of the Warehouse, (iii) perform the preparation work of the Additional Bar-Lev Land and build the Warehouse, through the administrative body of Bar-Lev industry park and other contractors according to plans provided by the Company. According to the said agreement, Kibbutz Sdot Yam will build
a Warehouse for the Company in Bar-Lev, that will be situated both on the current and new land. The finance of the building of the Warehouse will be made through a loan that will be granted by the Company to Kibbutz Sdot-Yam, in the amount of the total cost related to the building of the Warehouse and such loan, including principle and interest, shall be repaid by setoff of the lease due to Kibbutz Sdot Yam by the Company for its use of the warehouse. The principle amount of such loan will bear an interest at a rate of 5.3% a year. As of December 31, 2014 the construction of these facilities has not yet started.
|
NOTE 14:-
|
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES (Cont.)
|
|
e.
|
Land Purchase Agreement and Leaseback:
During September 2012, the Company completed the selling of the rights in the lands and facilities of the Bar-Lev Industrial Center (the "Bar-Lev Grounds") to Kibbutz Sdot-Yam in consideration for NIS 43.7 million (approximately $10,900). The carrying value of the Bar-Lev grounds at the time of closing this transaction was NIS 39 million (approximately $9,900). The land purchase agreement was executed simultaneously with the execution of a land use agreement. Pursuant to the land use agreement, Kibbutz Sdot-Yam will permit the Company to use the Bar-Lev Grounds for a period of 10 years commencing on September 2012 that will be automatically renewed, unless the Company gives two years prior notice, for a ten-year term in consideration for an annual fee of NIS 4.15 million (approximately $1,100) to be linked to increases in the Israeli consumer price index. The fee is subject to adjustment following January 1, 2021 and every three years thereafter at the option of Kibbutz Sdot-Yam if Kibbutz Sdot-Yam chooses to obtain an appraisal that supports such an increase. The appraiser would be mutually agreed upon or, in the absence of agreement, will be chosen by Kibbutz Sdot-Yam from a list of assessors recommended at that time by Bank Leumi.
Pursuant to the agreement discussed in the preceding paragraphs, prior to October 2017, if the Company wishes to acquire or lease any additional lands, whether in the Bar-Lev Grounds or elsewhere in Israel, for the purpose of establishing new plants or production lines: (i) Kibbutz Sdot-Yam will purchase the land and build the required facilities on such land at its own expense in accordance with the Company's needs; (ii) the Company will perform any additional building and necessary adjustments at the Company's expense; and (iii) Kibbutz Sdot-Yam will lease the land and the facility to the Company under a long-term lease agreement with terms to be negotiated in accordance with the then prevailing market price.
The Company's equipment that resides within the premises is considered integral equipment (as defined in ASC 360-20-15-4) due to the significant costs involved in relocating such equipment. Since the Company did not sell this equipment to Kibbutz Sdot-Yam as part of the transaction, the transaction is considered a partial sale and leaseback of real estate. As a result, the transaction does not qualify for "sale lease-back" accounting (as it is a failed sale from an accounting perspective) as defined under the relevant provisions of ASC 360-20, and the Company
recorded the entire amount received as consideration as a liability while the land and building will remain on its books until the end of the lease term under the provisions of ASC 840-40. If amounts to be paid under the arrangement were to be accreted as a liability based on the Company's incremental borrowing rate, the resulting liability would not cover the anticipated depreciated cost of the building and land at the end of the lease (thereby creating a built-in loss).
|
NOTE 14:-
|
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES (Cont.)
|
|
e.
|
Land Purchase Agreement and Leaseback (Cont.):
The entire amount that was paid was accreted to the full anticipated book value of the land and building at the end of the lease term using a higher effective interest rate that will equalize the amounts paid to the full anticipated book value of the land and building at the end of the lease. As of December 31, 2014, the Company’s liability as a result of this transaction is in the amount of $10,171.
|
2015
|
$ | 492 | ||
2016
|
523 | |||
2017
|
555 | |||
2018
|
590 | |||
2019
|
627 | |||
2020 and thereafter
|
7,384 | |||
$ | 10,171 |
|
f.
|
Management Services Agreement with Tene:
|
NOTE 14:-
|
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES (Cont.)
|
|
f.
|
Management Services Agreement with Tene (Cont.):
These amounts bear interest at an annual interest rate of 3.5% from their due date until actual payment. Commencing on January 3, 2010, the amount of the annual management fee was increased to NIS 870,000, linked to annual increases in the Israeli consumer price index plus 1.58% of the amount of the Company's annual pre-tax income before payment of the management fee based on the Company's annual financial statements.On December 31, 2011, the management services agreement was automatically renewed for an additional three-year period. The management services agreement was terminated immediately upon the closing of the IPO.
The Company paid Tene management fees totaling $0, $0 and $161, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
|
|
g.
|
Bonus paid by Tene:
During 2013, compensation expenses related to bonus paid by Tene in the amount of $810, to certain of its employees were recorded in the consolidated statements of operations in General and administrative expenses.
|
|
a.
|
The Company has, from time to time, entered into transactions with its shareholders (the Kibbutz and Tene).
The following table summarizes transactions with related parties:
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
$ | 9,073 | $ | 8,792 | $ | 6,147 | ||||||
Research and development
|
$ | 123 | $ | 211 | $ | 301 | ||||||
Selling and marketing
|
$ | 373 | $ | 632 | $ | 682 | ||||||
General and administrative
|
$ | 2,538 | $ | 1,649 | $ | 3,053 | ||||||
Finance expenses, net
|
$ | 685 | $ | 671 | $ | 236 |
NOTE 14:-
|
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES (Cont.)
|
|
Details on transactions and balances with related parties(cont.):
|
|
b.
|
Balances with related parties (cont.):
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||
Account payables and current maturities to related parties, including financing leaseback (1,2)
|
$ | 3,975 | $ | 2,602 | ||||
Long-term loan and financing leaseback from a related party (1,2)
|
$ | 8,993 | $ | 12,342 |
|
(1)
|
On January 17, 2011 a loan of 4 million Canadian dollars was made to Caesarstone Canada Inc. by its shareholders, CIOT and the Company, on a pro rata basis. The loan bears interest until repayment at a per annum rate equal to Bank of Canada's prime business rate plus
1
/4 percent. The interest accrued on the loan is payable on a quarterly basis. As of December 31, 2014 the loan was classified to short term related parties balance.
|
|
(2)
|
In September, 2012, a financing leaseback of $10.9 million related to Bar-Lev transaction was granted to the Company by Kibbutz Sdot-Yam. The financing leaseback bears interest until repayment at a per annum rate equal to 6.23% and is subject to adjustment for increases in the Israeli consumer price index.
|
NOTE 15:-
|
MAJOR CUSTOMER AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
|
|
a.
|
The Company manages its business on the basis of one reportable segment. The data is presented in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification 280, "Segments Reporting" ("ASC 280"). The following is a summary of revenue and long-lived assets by geographic area. Revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the location of end customers.
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
USA
|
$ | 185,583 | $ | 123,399 | $ | 86,759 | ||||||
Australia
|
107,539 | 89,894 | 88,935 | |||||||||
Canada
|
57,898 | 49,214 | 40,322 | |||||||||
Israel
|
41,286 | 42,024 | 36,373 | |||||||||
Europe
|
23,109 | 22,973 | 20,749 | |||||||||
Rest of World
|
31,987 | 29,050 | 23,426 | |||||||||
$ | 447,402 | $ | 356,554 | $ | 296,564 |
NOTE 15:-
|
MAJOR CUSTOMER AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (Cont.)
|
|
b.
|
The following table presents total long-lived assets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||
Israel
|
$ | 93,976 | $ | 85,491 | ||||
Australia
|
1,857 | 2,019 | ||||||
USA
|
75,873 | 4,748 | ||||||
Canada
|
1,144 | 1,197 | ||||||
Rest of World
|
143 | 179 | ||||||
$ | 172,993 | $ | 93,634 |
NOTE 16:-
|
SELECTED SUPPLEMENTARY STATEMENTS OF INCOME DATA
|
|
a.
|
Finance expense, net:
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Financial expenses:
|
||||||||||||
Interest in respect of long-term loans
|
$ | - | $ | 53 | $ | 461 | ||||||
Interest in respect of short-term loans and bank fees
|
3,038 | 1,565 | 1,187 | |||||||||
Interest in respect of loans to related parties
|
732 | 729 | 299 | |||||||||
Changes in derivatives fair value
|
2,710 | - | 1,169 | |||||||||
Foreign exchange transactions losses
|
- | 6,107 | 177 | |||||||||
6,480 | 8,454 | 3,293 | ||||||||||
Financial income:
|
||||||||||||
Changes in derivatives fair value
|
- | 6,485 | - | |||||||||
Income in respect of cash and cash equivalent and short-term bank deposits
|
403 | 655 | 520 | |||||||||
Foreign exchange transactions gains
|
5,032 | - | - | |||||||||
5,435 | 7,140 | 520 | ||||||||||
Financial expenses, net
|
$ | 1,045 | $ | 1,314 | $ | 2,773 |
|
b.
|
Net earnings per share:
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Net income attributable to controlling interest, as reported
|
$ | 78,439 | $ | 63,344 | $ | 39,632 | ||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted net income per share
|
$ | 78,439 | $ | 63,344 | $ | 39,632 |
NOTE 16:-
|
SELECTED SUPPLEMENTARY STATEMENTS OF INCOME DATA (Cont.)
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Denominator for basic income per share
|
34,932,000 | 34,666,514 | 32,641,701 | |||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options granted
|
462,499 | 543,432 | 58,047 | |||||||||
Denominator for diluted income per share
|
35,394,499 | 35,209,946 | 32,699,748 |
Year ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Basic earnings per share
|
$ | 2.25 | $ | 1.83 | $ | 1.21 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share
|
$ | 2.22 | $ | 1.80 | $ | 1.21 |
The Rialto
,
Level 3
0
525 Collins St
Melbourne Victoria 3
0
0
0
Correspondence to:
GPO Box 4736
Melbourne Victoria 3
00
1
T
+61 3 832
0
2222
F
+61 3 832
0
22
0
0
E
info
.
vic@au
.
gt.com
W
www
.
grantthornton.com
.
au
|
Product
|
Quantity 2015
|
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
and
|
CAESARSTONE SDOT
-
YAM LTD.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
1.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
|
2.
|
CONSENT
|
3.
|
GENERAL CONDITIONS AND DEFINITIONS
|
4.
|
SUPPLIER'S OBLIGATIONS AND SCOPE OF SUPPLY
|
5.
|
IMPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO THE SCOPE OF SUPPLY DURING EXECUTION
|
6.
|
SCHEDULE OF DELIVERIES
|
7.
|
SHIPPING AND PACKAGING
|
8.
|
BUYER'S OBLIGATIONS AND SITE STANDARDS
|
9.
|
INSURANCE
|
10.
|
TESTS/ACTIVITIES
– GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
11.
|
COLD TESTS
|
12.
|
HOT START-UP
|
13.
|
PERFORMANCE TESTS AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE
|
14.
|
FAILURE TO MEET GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
|
14A
|
PERFORMANCE BOND
|
15.
|
INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
|
16.
|
SUPPLIER'S GENERAL WARRANTY
|
17.
|
CONTRACT PRICE
|
18.
|
TERMS OF PAYMENT
|
19.
|
LICENCE
|
20.
|
SITE WHERE PLANT OPERATES: RIGHTS / OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES
|
21.
|
CONTRACT ASSIGNEMENT
|
22.
|
CONFIDENTIALITY
|
23.
|
COMING INTO FORCE AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF CONTRACT
|
24.
|
COMMUNICATIONS
|
25.
|
FORCE MAJEURE
|
26.
|
CONTROVERSIES BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND APPLICABLE LAW
|
27.
|
LIST OF EXHIBITS TO THE CONTRACT
|
28.
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
q
|
BUYER
has decided to set-up a fifth industrial facility for the manufacturing and processing of compound stone slabs
made by bonding together grits and powders of inert materials with unsaturated polyester resins dissolved in styrene, using the Bretonstone
®
System technology;
|
q
|
BRETON
is a world-famous manufacturer of plants, machinery and equipment for the production of engineered stone slabs using its own original technology and know-how;
|
q
|
BRETON
is the rightful and exclusive holder of rights to certain registered patents, relating to the Bretonstone System technology;
|
q
|
BUYER
has decided to purchase from
BRETON
and
BRETON
has decided to sell and provide
BUYER
nr. one Bretonstone® System plant (as described in Exhibit I°) for the production of engineered stone slabs using the Bretonstone® System technology, to be installed at the industrial facility located in Barlev, Israel (the "
Bar Lev Plant
") and wishes to have options to purchase the
USA Plant
, the
Biolenic Equipment
and the
Tiles Cutting Line
(as such terms are defined below), all in accordance with this Contract.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
1.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
|
2.
|
CONSENT
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
3.
|
GENERAL CONDITIONS AND DEFINITIONS
|
3.1.
|
This Contract includes the following General Conditions and Definitions, along with specific clauses outlining obligations and rights of the
Parties
. The following words and expressions shall have the meaning stated below, except where the context otherwise requires.
|
3.2
|
The
Parties
hereby mutually agree that they shall refer, and as far as possible cause others to refer, to this Contract as "
Contract N° IS-110/12 dated October 18, 2012
", in any correspondence and official documentation.3.3.
"Article"
means Article of the Contract. Any heading of articles are for convenience only.
|
3.4.
|
"Approval"
and
"Approved"
mean approval or approved in writing, or verbal approval subsequently approved in writing.
|
3.5.
|
"
BUYER
"
means
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD.
and/or any of its Affiliates as maybe designed by Buyer and includes, in accordance with the context of the Contract hereof, lawful successors and assignees.
|
3.6.
|
"
SUPPLIER
" or "
SELLER
" means
BRETON SpA
and includes, in accordance with the context of the Contract hereof, (a) its legal representatives, or lawful successors and assignees; (b) "
SUPPLIER
's Chief Engineer" as later specified; and (c)
SUPPLIER
's Technical Staff working at
Site
.
|
3.7.
|
"
BUYER
's
Chief Engineer
" means Mr. Gadi Livne
BUYER
expressly approves his conduct with respect to engineering matters related to the installation of the Plant at the BUYER’s site. BUYER shall be entitled to replace the appointed Buyer’s Chief Engineer and shall notify, in advance (if possible), to the SUPPLIER in writing about the new BUYER’s Chief Engineer.
|
3.8.
|
"
SUPPLIER
's
Chief Engineer
" means Mr. Gianfranco Comacchio, the person in charge appointed by
SUPPLIER
to manage in his name and for his account all the operating relations with
BUYER
and/or with "
BUYER
's Chief Engineer" at
Site
, during the implementation of this Contract. Prior to the installation of Plant at Site,
SUPPLIER
shall indicate in writing to
BUYER
the person in charge appointed as
SUPPLIER
's
Chief Engineer
, and expressly approves his conduct.
SUPPLIER
shall be entitled to recall the appointed Chief Engineer on Site by notifying the BUYER in writing in advance (if possible) and he shall concurrently appoint an adequate person to serve as the SUPPLIER’s Chief Engineer, including the deputy.
|
3.9.
|
"Parties"
means
BUYER
and
SUPPLIER
.
|
3.10.
|
"
Contract
" means this agreement including all articles/exhibits referred to herein or attached hereto.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
3.11.
|
"
Contract Price
" means the amount specified in article 17.
|
3.12.
|
"
Scope of Supply
" means drawings, machinery, equipment, know-how transfer, software and any ancillary machinery, equipment, information and data, license, rights, services, the achievement of the performance contemplated by the relevant machineries and any Supplier's commitment under this Contract, that
SUPPLIER
shall supply/make available to
BUYER
under this Contract, including without limitation, the Technical Documentation to be provided by the
SUPPLIER
in accordance with Section 6.1(b) herein, all as specified in Exhibit I of this Contract and anywhere else in this Contract and as required for the full successful operation of the Plants (as defined below) supplied by SUPPLIER to BUYER under this Agreement.
|
3.13.
|
"
Industrial Facility
" means the plant, equipment, machinery, facilities, materials, stocks, spare-parts and other items of all kinds, that each Party to this Contract shall make available in order to set up the industrial facility in the
Site
mentioned above, in accordance with the provisions agreed in this Contract.
|
3.14.
|
"
Plant
" means, with respect to each of the Bar Lev Plant, the USA Plant, the Tiles Cutting Line and the Biolenic Equipment - all the machines and equipment which compose the technological lines for the manufacturing of the products, including the ancillary equipment and plants related to such lines and/or machines, as described or stated herein and as specified in the Scope of Supply. The reference to the Plant in this Contract shall mean the Bar Lev Plant, the USA Plant, the Tiles Cutting Line and/or the Biolenic Equipment, as the case may be.
|
3.15.
|
"
Specifications
" means the specifications contained in this Contract.
|
3.16.
|
"
Schedule of deliveries
" means the schedule of deliveries as per article 6 herein.
|
3.17.
|
"
Notice of Goods Ready
"
means the notice to be given in writing by
SUPPLIER
to
BUYER
, prior to each delivery of the Plant or any part thereof, in accordance with Section 29.1 of this Contract.
|
3.18.
|
Intentionally Omitted.
|
3.19.
|
"
Cold Tests
" mean testing of the Plant, or of any part thereof, in no-load conditions, in accordance with article 11 herein.
|
3.20.
|
"
Hot Start-up
" means the production of what is specified in Exhibit III, through the use of the
Plant
under
SUPPLIER
's supervision, in accordance with article 12 herein.
|
3.21.
|
"
Certificate of Hot Start-up Executed
" is the certificate to be issued by in accordance with article 12 herein.
|
3.22.
|
"
Performance Tests
" mean such tests to be carried out by
SUPPLIER
with
BUYER
's effective co-operation, in order to check the compliance with the "
Guaranteed Performance Tests Figures
"
,
before the
Final Acceptance Certificate
of the Plant
is issued, all in accordance with article 13 herein.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
3.23.
|
"
Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant
" shall mean the certificate to be issued by
SUPPLIER
and signed by the
Parties
after the successful completion of the
Performance Tests
, in accordance with article 13 herein.
|
3.24.
|
"
Guaranteed Performance Test Figures
" means the figures guaranteed by
SUPPLIER
as stated in article 12 and 13 herein and Exhibit III and Exhibit IV.
|
3.25.
|
"
Logbook
", as per Exhibit II, means the journal containing a detailed account of the work progress and the results relating to any tests conducted pursuant to this Contract. The
Logbook
shall be properly prepared, filled in and kept by
SUPPLIER'
s
Chief Engineer
.
|
3.26
.
|
"
Trained Personnel
" or "
BUYER
's Designated Trained Personnel"
shall mean the employees to be specifically designated by
BUYER
for being trained by
SUPPLIER
pursuant to this Contract; such personnel shall be made available by
BUYER
at least from the date of beginning of the
Cold Tests
, unless any personnel replacements are made.
|
3.27.
|
"
Working Day
" means any day that is not considered as an official holiday in
SUPPLIER
's Country. During the implementation of works at
Site
under the
Contract
hereof, the working week shall be composed of at least five (5) working days out of seven (7) solar days, and “working day” shall mean any day. Without derogating from the abovementioned, the
Parties
shall agree upon which days out of the seven solar days are to be considered as working days.
|
3.28.
|
"
Warranty
" means the warranty covering the
Plant
as expressly stated under article 16 herein.
|
3.29.
|
"
Site
" means the land and other surrounding places on/through which the erection and installation of the
Plant
will be carried out and where
Plant
will operate.
|
3.30.
|
Intentionally omitted.
|
3.31
|
"
Forwarding Agent
" means a forwarder as shall be designated by the Party designed according to the delivery terms of this Contract.
|
3.32
|
"Trade Name
" means each of the
Seller's
and the
BUYER
's trademarks, logos, trade name, as the case may be.
|
3.33
|
"
USA Plant
" means one Bretonstone® System plant (as further described in Exhibit I) for the production of engineered stone slabs using Bretonstone® System technology, to be installed at the Buyer's designated industrial facility located anywhere in the USA.
|
3.34
|
"
Tiles Cutting Line
" means one Bretonstone® Slab Cutting Line (as described in Exhibit I) for the production of tiles.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
3.35
|
"
Biolenic Equipment
" means certain machines and equipment (as described in Exhibit I) for the preparation and feeding the moulding line with resins obtained from the reaction of [***] (i.e. Biolenic? resin) that does not involve the emission of styrene.
|
3.36
|
"Exercise Notice"
means each of "
USA Plant Exercise Notice
", "
Tiles Cutting Line Exercise Notice
" and "
Biolenic Exercise Notice
".
|
3.37
|
"Machinery and Equipment Delivery Date" –
the date all the machines that constitute the Plant are ready for delivery by Supplier to the Forwarding Agent and as notified by Supplier to Buyer.
|
3.38
|
"Plant Delivery Completion" –
will be considered as occurred if a
Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant
had been issued in accordance with Section 13.4 herein.
|
3.39
|
"
Completion of Cold Test
" – means finalizing the Cold Tests and achieving the parameters specified in Section 11.1.
|
3.40
|
"
Completion of Hot Start-up
"
-
means finalizing the Hot Start-up and achieving the parameters specified in Section 12.3.
|
3.41
|
"Test(s)/Activity/(ies)
" - means any of the Inspection, Installation, Cold Tests, Hot Start-Up, Performance Tests, and any other derived or related procedure.
|
4.
|
SUPPLIER'S OBLIGATIONS AND SCOPE OF SUPPLY
|
4.1.
|
SUPPLIER
shall, upon execution of this Contract and upon execution of any Exercise Notice, sell and supply all the drawings, Technical Documentation and any other documentation foreseen in this Contract, machinery and equipment and its control softwares as well as perform all the services within the "
Scope of Supply
", in accordance with any term of this Contract, including but not limited to
Exhibit
I
("
FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS AND PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF THE PLANT & DESCRIPTION OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES COMPOSING THE SUPPLY
"), namely:
|
4.1.1
|
description of the Plant functional specifications and production capacity in accordance with paragraph 1) of
Exhibit I
;
|
4.1.2
|
supply of machinery and equipment as mentioned under paragraph 2) of
Exhibit
I
;
|
4.1.3
|
supply of Technical Documentation, as mentioned under paragraph 3) of
Exhibit
I
;
|
4.1.4
|
supply of services as specified under paragraph 4) of
Exhibit
I
, namely:
|
|
§ a)
|
management and operation of installation and
Cold Tests
of
Plant
,
|
|
§ b)
|
management and operation of
Hot Start-up
and
Performance Tests
of
Plant
;
|
|
§ c)
|
Training to
BUYER
's personnel in charge with production.
|
4.2
|
SUPPLIER’s personnel at the Site shall comply with BUYER’s safety and security procedures and instructions that BUYER shall be responsible to clearly illustrate to SUPPLIER’s personnel at Site.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
5.
|
IMPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO THE SCOPE OF SUPPLY DURING EXECUTION
|
6.
|
SCHEDULE OF DELIVERIES
|
6.1
|
SUPPLIER
shall make available all the documentation, machinery and equipment and perform all the services under this Contract in full compliance with the Scope of Supply and the
Schedule of deliveries
set forth below.
|
|
a)
|
Machinery and Equipment
Delivery Dates :
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
1)
|
Within seven (7) calendar days as from the Coming into Effect date of this Contract (or the Exercise Notice with respect to the USA Plant, the Tiles Cutting Line or the Biolenic Equipment, as applicable),
SELLER
shall submit to
BUYER
's approval the general layout of the
Plant
.
|
2)
|
Layout of the electrical, water (if applicable) and pneumatic feeding points, with specifications of the water (if applicable) and electric requirements.............
60
days
|
3)
|
Layout of foundations and standard working drawings of foundations...........
60
days
|
4)
|
General technical specifications and instructions of ancillary equipment and plants servicing the Plant, which are not to be supplied by
SELLER
, but have to be designed and manufactured directly by
BUYER
..............60
days
|
5)
|
Operation and maintenance handbooks of machines and equipment and relevant electric diagrams and spare parts
with the machines
|
6)
|
List of suggested spare parts ……………………………120 days from the Coming into Effect Date (or the USA Plant Exercise Notice, or Tile Cutting Line Exercise Note or Biolenic Equipment Exercise Note, as and if applicable)
|
c)
|
Services
|
|
(i)
|
performing and completing the Tests\Activities with respect to the Bar Lev Plant – will be in accordance with the schedule set forth in Section 4.4 (1) of Exhibit I.
|
|
(ii)
|
performing and completing the Tests\Activities with respect to the USA Plant – will be in accordance with the schedule set forth in Section 4.4 (2) of Exhibit I.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
|
(iii)
|
performing and completing the Tests\Activities with respect to the Tiles Cutting Line – will be in accordance with the schedule set forth in Section 4.4 (3) of Exhibit I.
|
|
(iv)
|
performing and completing the Tests\Activities with respect to the Biolenic Equipment – will be in accordance with the schedule set forth in Section 4.4 (4) of Exhibit I.
|
6.2
|
Delivery of technical documentation shall be executed by express courier.
|
6.3
|
Delays.
SELLER
acknowledges that time is of the essence in the performance of this Contract and that delays shall cause
BUYER
significant damages. Without derogating from
BUYER'
s rights, it is hereby agreed that in case of delays in relation to the dates set forth in Section 6.1 above,
SELLER
shall pay
BUYER
for every complete calendar week of delay, a penalty equal to [***]% of the Contract Price (the
"Penalty"
);
|
|
(i)
|
If the results of the Performance Tests of the Bar Lev Plant, the USA Plant and the Tiles Cutting Line differ from the
GUARANTEE PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
set forth in Section A of Exhibit IV and the tolerance defined thereto in section A of Exhibit IV by up to [***]% of the said
GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
(which means that together with the tolerance defined in section A to Exhibit IV it differs from the
GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
by up to [***]%)
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
|
(ii)
|
If the results of the Performance Tests of the Bar Lev Plant, the USA Plant and the Tiles Cutting Line differ from the
GUARANTEE ON THE PRODUCT QUALITY FIGURES
set forth in sub sections (a), (b) and (c) of Section A1 of Exhibit IV and the tolerance defined thereto in section A1 of Exhibit IV by up to [***]% of the said
GUARANTEED
ON THE PRODUCT QUALITY FIGURES
(which means that together with the tolerance defined in section A1 to Exhibit IV it differs from the .
GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
by up to [***]%)
|
6.4
|
In case that the Buyer does not collect the Plant from Seller within 30 days following the written notice by the Seller that the Plant (in a whole) is ready for delivery in accordance with this Contract, then Seller shall be entitled, after 7 days written notice to Buyer, to deliver the Plant to Buyer's Site, at Buyer's expense, which shall be paid as soon as Buyer receives an invoice from Supplier. In such case Buyer shall be committed to release the machines from customs in the designated port, and store them as required. Buyer shall be responsible for any demurrage of the containers which are not released in accordance with the aforementioned; All of the above mentioned, does not apply in case that the Buyer's delay in collecting the Plant is related to any of the following:(i)the Machine and Equipment Delivery Date had not occurred within two calendars months from the time scheduled in Section 6.1; (ii) Force Majeure.
|
7.1
|
Included in the Contract Price, the goods shall be delivered FCA Breton (Incoterms 2010) – transportation insurance not included
.
|
7.2
|
SUPPLIER
shall inform
BUYER
in writing about each forthcoming delivery at least fifteen (15) days before the scheduled date, in order to allow
BUYER
to make the required arrangements.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
7.3
|
In the event
of damage to or loss within delivery of the Plant or any part thereof which is not at the Supplier's responsibility,
BUYER
shall be entitled to purchase from Seller the relevant machines and equipment to replace the damaged and lost machines and equipment and
SELLER
undertakes to supply such machines and equipment accordingly with a new separate Agreement which will be negotiated between the parties in good faith and will substantially follow the conditions of this Contract.
|
8.
|
BUYER'S OBLIGATIONS AND SITE STANDARDS
|
8.1.
|
BUYER
shall be responsible for the adequacy accessibility, maintenance and safety of the
Site
for the whole period of force of this
Contract
and will make the Site and the Buyer's personnel and equipment available from the beginning of Installation and until the Plant Delivery Completion.
|
8.2
|
BUYER
shall be responsible under the applicable Laws at the Site, from the Machinery and Equipment Delivery Date throughout the entire set-up of the Industrial Facility, for the following:
|
|
(a)
|
safety of all persons entitled to enter the
Site
in order
to avoid any danger to persons or things
for the whole period of force of this
Contract
;
|
|
(b)
|
take reasonable measures required for maintaining the
Site
and the
Industrial Facility
in proper condition for the whole period until the issuance of the Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant.
|
8.3
|
In case
BUYER
should need for all the maintenance and operating handbooks of the machines and equipment supplied by
SUPPLIER
some different language than English,
then
BUYER
shall be responsible for their translation in the new required language.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
9.
|
INSURANCE
|
9.1
|
Supplier will obtain and maintain, as long as it has legal liability in connection with thesupplied machines and/or equipment at its own expense comprehensive generalliability insurance, including Product Liability coverage, with a reputable insurancecompany, of at least [***] euros (Euro [***]) per occurrence combined single limit, and aggregate limit of [***] euros (Euro [***]).
|
|
|
Supplier will provide BUYER with a certificate of insurance evidencing such insurance. Such certificate will further contain a provision that said policy or policies cannot be cancelled, terminated, nor renewed or materially changed during the term of the insurance cover without thirty (30) days prior written notice to BUYER.
|
|
The stipulated limits of coverage above will not be construed as a limitation of any potential liability of Supplier, and failure to request evidence of this insurance will in no way be construed as a waiver of Supplier’s obligation to provide the insurance coverage specified.
|
9.2
|
The
Parties
agree that any damage/amount not covered by an insurance, or not recovered from insurers, shall be borne by
BUYER
or
SUPPLIER
in accordance with their respective responsibilities under this
Contract
or, if not specified in this Contract, under the applicable Laws.
|
9.3
|
BUYER
shall insure the
Site
,
Plant
, goods delivered by
SUPPLIER
on Site,
BUYER
's working tools used in
Site
and whatever else
BUYER
's property which is needed and the works on site by erection all risk ( EAR ) insurance policy that include cover to property damage third party liability cover and employers liability cover. In the EAR policy SELLER will be named as additional insured.
|
9.4
|
Without derogating from any other of his liability SELLER shall be solely responsible for the safety of SELLER'S personnel at the Site and shall be liable for any bodily and property damages caused to SELLER'S personnel at the Site. Additionally, SELLER shall be liable for any bodily and property damages caused to BUYER or BUYER'S personnel by SELLER'S personnel at the Site.
|
10.
|
TESTS/ACTIVITIES
– GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
10.1
|
SUPPLIER and BUYER,
each one according with the respective responsibility defined in this Contract, shall take any reasonable step in order to effectively and timely carry out any of the Tests/Activities provided for in this
Contract
with respect to the
Plant
.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
10.2
|
All the cost for the implementation of the Test/Activity foreseen in this Contract, except for Supplier's personnel salaries, shall be borne by
BUYER
, except for
Performance Test
that shall be borne by
BUYER
only up to fourth test included.
|
10.3
|
SUPPLIER
shall give
BUYER
a two days' advance notice in writing of any Test/Activity to be carried out (the transcription of the notice in the Logbook with at least a two days' advance will have the same validity as a written communication).
|
10.4
|
The "
Logbook
" shall always record and certify any Test/Activity, as set forth in Article 3.25 hereof.
|
10.5
|
Any Test/Activity shall be carried out for the machines and equipment composing the Plant subject of this Contract and separate Certificates will be issued per each Test/Activity relevant to the machines and equipment composing the Exhibit I.
|
10.6
|
It is hereby clarified that the execution (including the successful execution) of any Test\Activity and the issuance of any certificate in accordance with the terms herein shall not derogate from the
SUPPLIER's
liability for the proper operation of the machines and equipment as specified herein.
|
|
Except for the issuance of the Certificate which is specifically required under this Contract, no other record, including record made in the Logbook, shall be considered as such Certificate (which shall be issued in accordance with the relevant specimen Exhibit to this Contract).
|
10.7
|
All Test\Activities shall be conducted by the Supplier in accordance with the time table set forth in Exhibit I article 4.4.
|
11
.
|
COLD TESTS
|
11.1.
|
Upon completion of the installation at
Site
(including connecting of the Plant to all utilities required for its operation), each group of machines and/or equipment composing the
Plant
or, at
SUPPLIER
's discretion, the complete
Plant
, shall be subject to separate "
Cold Tests
". "
Cold Tests"
as a whole shall be carried out in view of assessing the:
|
|
a)
|
compliance of the
Plant
supplied with the
Scope of Supply
;
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
|
b)
|
effectiveness under no-load conditions of the machinery/equipment subject to "
Cold Tests
".
|
|
c)
|
Continuous and error-free operation of the software and control system
|
11.2.
|
At least two (2) working days prior to the selected date,
SUPPLIER
shall inform
BUYER
in writing (the simple annotation in the Logbook being also valid to such end) that the
Plant
, or part thereof, shall be subject to "
Cold Tests
".
BUYER
shall be entitled to attend the Tests.
|
12
.
|
HOT START-UP
|
12.1
|
After the issuance of the last "
Certificate of Cold Test Executed
" and in accordance with the relevant time table of Exhibit I, article 4.4, the Plant shall be operated under load conditions. At least two (2) working days prior to the selected date,
SUPPLIER
shall inform
BUYER
in writing (the simple annotation in the Logbook being also valid to such end) that the
Plant
, or part thereof, shall be subject to "
Hot Start-up
".
|
12.2
|
The "
Hot Start-up
" could be carried out for groups of machines even if "
Cold Tests
" have not been fully accomplished, provided that both
Parties
state in writing to proceed with the "
Hot Start-up
" (the simple annotation in the Logbook being also valid to such end).
|
12.3
|
The production of what is specified under
Exhibit III
("
Guaranteed Hot Start-up Test Figures)"
, using the
Plant
correctly under the
SUPPLIER
's supervision, shall constitute the "
Hot Start-up of the Plant
" successfully completed.
|
12.4
|
BUYER
shall provide at his own cost and care, in due time for the execution of "
Hot Start-up
" and in sufficient quantity and quality all such operational and managerial personnel, labour, mixtures prepared with the mixing groups provided by the
BUYER,
ancillary materials, working tools, consumption materials, utilities including, but not limited to, electricity, water, gas, compressed air and whatever is needed as per
SUPPLIER
's
reasonable written instructions and/or according to what may be required during the start-up, in view of the best and most effective accomplishment of the test at issue.
|
12.5
|
Upon successful completion of the "
Hot Start-up
" (as mentioned in Section 12.3 above), a "
Certificate of Hot Start-up Executed
" shall be issued by
SUPPLIER
and countersigned by
BUYER
within the following two (2) working days
(the specimen of which is attached hereto in
Exhibit VI
). The
Hot Start-up
and relevant results shall anyway be recorded and certified in the Logbook.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
13.
|
PERFORMANCE TESTS AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE
|
13.1
|
"
Performance Tests
" shall be conducted on machines and equipment composing the Plant and shall be conducted in accordance with what is set forth in
Exhibit
IV
after the signing of the Certificate of Hot Start Up Executed, and performed and completed in accordance with the relevant time table set forth in Exhibit I, article 4.4. At least two (2) working days prior to the selected date,
SUPPLIER
shall inform
BUYER
in writing (the simple annotation in the Logbook being also valid to such end) that the
Plant
shall be subject to "
Performance Tests
". The aim of the "
Performance Tests
" is to show that
Plant
can achieve the "
Guaranteed Performance Test Figures
" as they are set forth in
Exhibit
IV
.
|
13.2
|
"
Performance Tests
" shall be carried out by Supplier
.
I
t being however understood that
BUYER
shall actively attend the "
Performance Tests
" for the entire period of the Performance Test.
|
13.3
|
BUYER
shall provide at his own cost and care, in due time for the execution of "
Performance Tests
" and in sufficient quantity and quality all such operational, managerial, laboratory and maintenance personnel, labour
,
ancillary materials, tools for operation and maintenance, measuring instruments, equipment, apparatus, consumption materials, utilities including, but not limited to, electricity, water, gas, compressed air etc. as specified herein, or otherwise by way of written instructions from
SUPPLIER
as may be reasonably required during the test, in view of the best and most effective accomplishment of the Performance Test at issue.
|
13.4
|
Upon the successful completion of the "
Performance Tests
" (as specified in Section 13.2 above), a "
Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant
" (the specimen of which is attached hereto in Exhibit VII) shall be issued by
SUPPLIER
's Chief Engineer and countersigned by
BUYER
’s Chief Engineer within two (2) working days thereafter. The
Performance Tests
and relevant results shall anyway be recorded and certified in the Logbook.
|
14.
|
FAILURE TO MEET GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
|
14.1.
|
If, at the end of the "
Hot Start-up
" or "
Performance Tests
", the "
Guaranteed Performance Test Figures
" or the
“Guaranteed Hot Start-up Test Figures”,
respectively
,
are not met, then
SUPPLIER
and
BUYER
shall meet to analyse the reasons of such non-achievement, decide the remedial measures and agree to conduct a new series of tests.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
|
If also the new tests prove to be unsuccessful for reasons attributable to
SUPPLIER
, the latter shall then make, at his own cost and care, such modifications/repairs to the equipment and/or replacements of materials, as they shall be necessary to achieve the "Guaranteed Hot Start-up Test Figures" or the "
Guaranteed Performance Test Figures
", as the case may be
SUPPLIER
shall be entitled to repeat at least three times the relevant test that proved to be unsuccessful due to reasons directly attributable to
SUPPLIER
. Nothing in this Section shall derogate from Supplier's obligations to comply with the time table set forth in Section 4.4 of Exhibit I.
|
14.A
|
PERFROMANCE BOND
|
|
In order to guarantee the Plant Delivery Completion, the time schedule, Penalty payable under section 6.3 to this Contract and warranty, Supplier shall submit to Buyer, before collection of the last [***]% Contract Price and as a condition thereto, a performance bond of [***]% of the Contract Price, to be issued by a first class Italian bank, at a form as per Exhibit VIII (the "
Performance Bond
"). The Performance Bond shall be effective and exercisable, in whole or in part, for [***] months from the date of its issuance. In case that the Warranty Period terminates after such [***] months, Supplier shall extend the Performance Bond accordingly, at least 30 days prior to its expiration.
|
|
The Performance Bond may be exercised in full or in part and in more than one occasion in case of Penalty payable under section 6.3 and/or breach of Seller's responsibility under the warranty (as above referred to in this Section 14A), in amounts as shall be reasonably assessed by Buyer.
|
15.
|
Intentionally omitted.
|
16.
|
SUPPLIER'S GENERAL WARRANTY
|
16.1
|
SUPPLIER
warrants hereby that all machinery and equipment (included the relevant control software) included in the
Scope of Supply
shall be free from defects in workmanship and/or materials and that
Plant,
once completed, shall be fit for the purpose
for which it has been engineered under this
Contract
.
|
16.2
|
SUPPLIER
shall take any reasonable action to repair and/or eliminate any defects in design, workmanship, working materials and operation as may arise during a period of twelve (12) months as from the date of the "
Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant”
signed by the parties.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
16.3
|
The
Parties
expressly agree that during the Warranty Period:
|
(i)
|
SUPPLIER
shall bear any cost, shipment included, related to repair/replacement of defective parts that, if replaced, shall become his property;
|
(ii)
|
BUYER
shall provide and bear customs duties.
|
(iii)
|
BUYER
shall bear all the expenses incurred for the intervention of
SUPPLIER
's technicians (round trip, board and lodging, local transfers) in accordance with the conditions stated in Exhibit I – paragraph 4.1 hereof).
|
(iv)
|
The Seller will send to Buyer, during the Warranty Period, in order to perform said fixing and replacement, skilled technicians not later than 5 (five) working days from the date the Buyer sends a detailed notice to the Seller notifying it of the need for fixing with a description of the problems which occurred save where the nature of the defect is such that can be repaired by the Buyer.
|
(v)
|
Parts will be supplied by the Seller FOB Italian port or airport.
|
16.4
|
The Seller undertakes to supply the Buyer with all the spare parts (and technical support and assistance at site or outside the Site, as shall be required) that will be needed in the future, for the operation of the Plant, for a period of at least 10 (ten) years from the Plant Delivery Completion Date (with respect to any Plant). The price for said spare parts, technical support and assistance will be determined by the Seller provided that such a price ex-factory will not be higher than the lowest price the Seller charges or will charge its other customers.
|
16.5.
|
During the Warranty Period Buyer shall notify in writing to
SUPPLIER
of any defect for which
SUPPLIER
's assistance is required, within five (5) working days after the defect has been discovered by Buyer. Should the defect claimed be such that
BUYER
knew or, with reasonable diligence, should have known of its existence, and failure to correct the defect would be likely to cause additional damage to
Plant
and
BUYER
nonetheless fails to report the claim to
SUPPLIER
within the above term, then
SUPPLIER
shall not be held responsible for the abovementioned additional damage caused to
Plant
.
|
16.6.
|
In any event a claim for defects is made by
BUYER
,
BUYER
expressly agrees to actively co-operate with
SUPPLIER
and to allow
SUPPLIER
to carry out the necessary inspections, repairs, replacements or improvements as the case may be.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
16.7.
|
SUPPLIER
shall have no responsibility for damages or repairs under this Warranty if the damages and repair required are the direct result of the following events:
|
|
a)
|
BUYER
has modified or altered the machines, without
SUPPLIER
's prior written consent; It is hereby clarified that maintenance work and repairs made by the Buyer in accordance with Section16.10, shall not be deemed as modification and alteration of the machines for the purpose of this section.
|
|
b)
|
BUYER
has operated/maintained the machines in a negligence manner and however not in compliance with the written indications of
SUPPLIER
provided to Buyer;
|
|
c)
|
installation or start-up have been carried out without
SUPPLIER
's supervision;
|
|
d)
|
the defect claimed by
BUYER
is caused due to other machines, not supplied by the Supplier, used by Buyer at the Site in conjunction with the Plant, even according to
SUPPLIER
's specifications, unless they are wrong.
|
16.8.
|
SUPPLIER
's warranty obligations shall be suspended each time
BUYER
has not duly met his payment obligations which are not disputed between the parties.
|
16.9
|
SUPPLIER
shall not be held liable, under any circumstance and to any extent, for events, accidents, failures, delays, defects, losses, damages due to equipment, systems, devices, labour, on
BUYER
's
Site/Plant
which have not been supplied by
SUPPLIER
, notwithstanding whether or not
SUPPLIER
may, at any time during the implementation of this Contract, accept or approve their presence or usage.
|
16.10
|
BUYER
shall provide and bear all related costs of ordinary maintenance works and minor repairs to
Plant
and equipment, even during the
Warranty
period. For this purpose,
BUYER
shall equip his factory, since the "
Hot Start-up
", with basic equipment and instruments as well as with sufficiently qualified technical personnel.
SUPPLIER
shall exclusively supply the parts covered by the Warranty as regulated under this
Contract
. In case that Buyer does not succeed to make such minor repair with reasonable efforts, it will inform Supplier and Supplier shall be responsible to repair it in accordance with the Warranty.
|
16.11.
|
Without derogating from Seller's Warranty obligations,
BUYER
shall have the right, in his own discretion, to assign to third parties the task of replacing or repairing any defective part that he cannot replace/repair through his own personnel, at
SUPPLIER
's cost, in the event that
SUPPLIER
is unable or does not want to take immediate action in order to repair defects falling within the
Warranty
provisions.
BUYER
shall always inform
SUPPLIER
in writing as to his decision to assign the above work to third parties giving notice of the cost as well.
|
16.11.1
|
Any parts subject to wear and tear as well as tools and consumption materials are not covered by this
Warranty
, although supplied by
SUPPLIER
along with machinery.
|
16.12.
|
The
Warranty
hereunder shall not cover any damage, loss or defect due to (i) negligence unloading, transportation or handling of machinery carried out by
BUYER
(or his assignees, representatives, agents, employees, carriers, forwarders, etc.), or (ii) any deteriorations due to negligence storage of goods by
BUYER
, and (iii) deterioration/ageing due to extended storage of goods by
BUYER
for reasons not attributable to
SUPPLIER
.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
17.
|
CONTRACT PRICE
|
17.1.
|
The
Contract Price
with respect to the Plant is as follow (the
"Contract Price"
):
|
|
(i) the Bar Lev Plant Contract Price
- a total of Euro
[***] ([***]).
|
|
(ii) the USA Plant Contract Price – a total of Euro [***] ([***]) ( It is hereby agreed and confirmed by the parties that the equipment specified in Exhibit I for the USA Plant is not final and is subject to insignificant adjustments – such insignificant adjustment shall not increase the USA Plant Contract Price).
|
|
Seller shall provide Buyer, within 14 calendar days of the Coming into Force of this Contract the breakdown of the USA Plant Contract Price, for each machinery group that constitute the USA Plant.
|
|
(iii) the Tiles Cutting Line Contract Price – Euro [***] ([***])
|
|
(iv) the Biolenic Equipment Contract Price – Euro [***] ([***])
|
|
The reference to the Contract Price in this Contract shall mean the Bar Lev Plant Contract Price, the USA Plant Contract Price, the Tiles Cutting Line Contract Price and/or the Biolenic Equipment Contract Price, as the case may be.
|
17.2
|
SUPPLIER
shall pay all export duties, excises or taxes that may be due under Italian Laws and regulations at the time of execution hereof.
|
17.3
|
The Contract Price shall be paid by Buyer to Supplier, in accordance to the payment terms set forth in Exhibit IX, in exchange for the supply and performance of what is specified in detail within the
Scope of Supply
hereof. The Contract Price shall be the final and exclusive payment for which the Supplier shall be entitled for under this Contract for the Scope of Supply.
|
17.4
|
The
Contract
Price
does not include any tax, interest payment or other financing charge or consultancy fee/cost due by
BUYER
to third parties, if any, under the terms of his financing arrangements, nor any import tax, excise, expenses or federal, state or local tax that
BUYER
, or a third party in the name and on behalf of
BUYER
, is required to pay under the Laws in force in the Site.
BUYER
shall bear the cost of everything specified in this Article 17.4 (which are not set for the Supplier payment under any other section in this Contract).
|
18.
|
TERMS OF PAYMENT
|
18.1.
|
Payments shall be made in
EURO
and shall be considered as accomplished upon full receipt of funds at
SUPPLIER
's bank account, free from any lien or restriction.
|
18.2.
|
The
Contract Price
shall be paid in accordance with the payment terms set forth in
Exhibit X
.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
19.
|
LICENSE
|
19.1.
|
The
Parties
hereby expressly acknowledge and undertake the following:
|
|
(a)
|
along with the supply of the
Plant
subject-matter of this Contract and for no additional payment of any kind,
SUPPLIER
hereby grants
BUYER
a license to use any registered patent and software that the Supplier may own or have right to at the time of this Contract or thereafter (if any) related to the Plant and the manufacturing of products by using the Plant (the “
License
”); Such License is non-exclusive, royalty free, irrevocable, may be used by Buyer unconditionally and may be transferred to third parties with the Plant. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, Buyer shall not directly or indirectly transfer the License to third parties, that at Buyer's reasonable knowledge are competitors of the Supplier that produce and sell machinery similar to the Plant for the production of compound stone. Supplier represents that other than the aforementioned Licence no additional license is required for the free operation of the Plant.
|
|
(b)
|
after the supply of the
Plant
that is the subject-matter of this
Contract
,
SUPPLIER
shall inform
BUYER
of, and offer him in that applicable to his plant, any technical and technological improvement and updating that may be made to the product manufacturing process.
|
19.2
|
Intentionally omitted.
|
19.3
|
Each Party shall always refer fairly to the
Trade Names
of other party’s property. Each Party shall not, whether during or after this Contract represent in any way that it owns the Trade Names or is entitled to use the Trade Names otherwise than as specifically provided herein.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
20.
|
SITE WHERE PLANT OPERATES: RIGHTS / OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES
|
|
BUYER
shall set up the
Plant
that is the subject matter of this
Contract
in Israel and the United State of America (as may be elected by the Buyer), as specified in this
Contract
.
|
21
|
CONTRACT ASSIGNMENT
|
|
"Affiliates"
means a corporate or an association, which is Controlled by the BUYER, . The term “Control” shall mean direct or indirect ownership of more than 50% of the equity or voting capital of an entity, the ability to appoint or elect a majority of the members of the board of directors (or similar organ) of the entity or possession of the right and power to direct the policy and management of such entity.
|
22
|
CONFIDENTIALITY
|
|
The
Parties
hereby expressly agree and acknowledge that the terms of this
Contract and
its
Exhibits
hereof are strictly confidential.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
|
In addition, SUPPLIER acknowledges that the content of this Contract and any information with respect thereto and with respect to
BUYER
and its Affiliates, and to their operation, business plan and other information, is confidential and shall be maintained by SUPPLIER in confidence and shall not be disclosed to any third party nor otherwise will be used by SUPPLIER. In addition Buyer hereby informs Supplier and Supplier acknowledges that, any such information may be considered as "material information" with respect to the BUYER's business, and therefor SUPPLIER may be subject to certain restrictions with respect to the trading in BUYER shares, in accordance with the United States Securities
Exchange
Act
of 1934 and unauthorized disclosure of information related to BUYER and/or to this Contract, may constitute a breach of the applicable securities laws and regulation.
|
23.
|
COMING INTO FORCE OF CONTRACT
|
23.1.
|
Coming into force
: this
Contract
shall enter into force and be binding upon the
Parties
from the date of signing by
BUYER
and
SUPPLIER
.
|
24.
|
COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Any communication to be sent under this
Contract
by either
Party
to the other, shall be made in writing at the address stated on the first page hereof, by fax or mail, save otherwise agreed upon, at the only attention of the following persons: (i) for
BUYER
Mr. Giora Wagman
(ii) for
SUPPLIER
Mr. Giancarlo Crestani
Either
Party
shall have the right to change its respective address and above specified persons by notice to be sent to the other
Party
.
|
25.
|
FORCE MAJEURE
|
25.1.
|
Force Majeure
events shall be considered as such only if: (i) they are not under any party's control, (ii) they occur after signing of the
Contract,
(iii) if they prevent the
Contract
from being implemented totally or partially, and (iv) there is no possibility for the party who is prevented from preforming its obligations due to such event, to overcome the effect of such event and perform its obligations nevertheless (
"Force Majeure"
).
|
25.2
|
If either
Party
is prevented from or delayed in performing any of its obligations under the
Contract
due to
Force Majeure
, then the
Party
being so affected shall notify timely and officially the other, by registered mail return receipt requested, of the circumstances constituting
Force Majeure
with adequate evidence of the obligation or performance which is thereby delayed or prevented. The
Party
giving notice shall thereupon be excused with respect to the performance or punctual execution thereof for the duration of the circumstances constituting
Force Majeure.
|
25.3.
|
In case
Force Majeure
conditions last continuously for more than one (1)
month as from the date of the official notice pursuant to Article 25.2, the
Parties
shall meet to agree on the necessary arrangements to be taken. It is understood that each
Party
shall have fulfilled its contractual obligations as far as they have become due before the occurrence of the
Force Majeure
event.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
25.4.
|
Intentionally Omitted
|
26.
|
CONTROVERSIES BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND APPLICABLE LAW
|
27.
|
LIST OF EXHIBITS TO THE CONTRACT
|
|
This
Contract
includes the following
Exhibits
, which form an integral and un-severable part hereof:
|
|
All terms not specifically defined in a certain exhibit shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Contract or in another Exhibit thereto.
|
|
1.
|
Exhibit I
|
FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS AND PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF THE PLANT & DESCRIPTION OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES COMPOSING THE SUPPLY
|
|
2.
|
Exhibit II
|
Specimen of the "Logbook"
|
|
3.
|
Exhibit III
|
Method of execution of Hot Start-up of the Plant
|
|
4.
|
Exhibit IV
|
Guaranteed performance test figures and method of execution of Performance tests of the Plant
|
|
5.
|
Exhibit V
|
Specimen of the Certificate of Cold Test Executed
|
|
6.
|
Exhibit VI
|
Specimen of the Certificate of Hot Start-up Executed
|
|
7.
|
Exhibit VII
|
Specimen of the Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant
|
|
8.
|
Exhibit VIII
|
Specimen of the Performance Bond
|
|
9.
|
Exhibit IX
|
Terms and Conditions of The Option TO Purchase USA Plant, Tiles Cutting Line and Biolenic Equipment
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
|
10.
|
Exhibit X
|
Terms of payment
|
|
11.
|
Exhibit XI
|
Form of Bank Guarantee
|
28.
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
28.1
|
Intentionally omitted.
|
|
28.2
|
Intentionally omitted.
|
|
28.3
|
Modifications or additions to this
Contract
shall be binding upon the
Parties
only upon approval in writing by the respective legal representatives, with specific reference being made to this article and to that part of the
Contract
or
Exhibit
subject to modification / addition.
|
|
28.4
|
The
Parties
shall actively co-operate in order to obtain permits, approvals, export and import licenses, etc. required for the implementation of this
Contract
. It is however agreed that
each Party
shall be solely responsible for obtaining all local permits and licenses necessary for the execution and implementation of this Contract in his Country, for which he shall bear all related expenses.
|
|
28.6
|
This
Contract
has been freely discussed, negotiated and drawn up in Sdot-Yam (Israel). N° 3 originals have been duly signed, of which n° 1 for
SUPPLIER
and n° 2 for
BUYER
.
|
|
28.7
|
Should one or more provisions of this
Contract
be partly of wholly invalidated or declared ineffective, any other provisions shall remain fully valid and effective.
The
Parties
agree that any possible misunderstanding or difficulty of interpretation of
Contract
shall be overcome by considering all the provisions stated in the Contract, having the essence and interpretation of the Contract in its entirety prevailed (
Exhibits
included).
|
29.
|
INSPECTION
|
29.1
|
Prior to shipping of the goods,
SUPPLIER
shall allow
BUYER
, at his own expenses, to inspect the machines ("
Buyer Inspections
"), at
SUPPLIER
's premises; the inspection shall verify only that the supply is as per the Contract in term of quantity and specification (as listed in Exhibit I of this Contract).
SUPPLIER
shall send Notice of Goods Ready only after
BUYER
shall confirm that the machine had successfully passed
BUYER
Inspections or in absence of such confirmation or a written notice that the delivery is not confirmed, if within 7 calendar days from the written notice that the machine are ready for the above inspection BUYER’s experts have not yet executed the inspection or have not yet send the written report about the executed inspection. It is explicitly agreed that BUYER Inspections do not derogate from SUPPLIER exclusive liability to the condition of the Plant, its appropriate operation and full performance of its undertakings under this Contract.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
|
SELLER's
Chief Technician shall visit the Site immediately after the
BUYER
notifies the
SELLER
that the Site is ready for the provision of the equipment and machines, in order to verify that the Site is so ready for the Plant Installation. The above mentioned Buyer’s notification that the Site is ready – with respect to Bar Lev shall be sent to Supplier not later than one calendar month in advance of the Machinery and Equipment Delivery Date as per Exhibit I, article 4.4
|
_________________________________ | ___________________________ | |
BUYER
Yos Shiran – CEO, Maxim Ohana - Chairman
CAESARSTONE – SDOT YAM
M. P. HEFER 38805 – Israel
|
SUPPLIER
Giancarlo Crestani (Director)
BRETON S.P.A.
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italy)
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
1.
|
Option to purchase USA Plant.
Buyer shall have a right to purchase the USA Plant, under the following terms and conditions:
|
|
a.
|
Option Term:
18 months as of the date of this Contract Coming into Force Date – Buyer is entitled to give Seller the USA Plant Exercise Notice within such 18 months.
|
|
b.
|
USA Plant Contract Price
: as set forth in Section 17.1(ii) of the Contract.
|
|
c.
|
USA Option Down Payment
Amount
: Buyer shall pay Supplier [***] ([***]) Euros for its right to purchase the USA Plant (the "
USA Option Down Payment
Amount
"), which will be paid together with the Bar Lev Advance Payment specified in the Contract Exhibit IX. In the event the
BUYER
shall not exercise its right to purchase the USA Plant within 18 months of the
Coming Into Force
Date
of this Contract, then [***] ([***]) Euros out of the
USA Option Down Payment
Amount
shall be deemed as a conclusive and final compensation to the SELLER for the BUYER's refrainment from exercising its right to purchase the USA Plant and the SELLER shall not have any further right or claim related thereto. In addition, the remaining [***] ([***]) Euro out of the
USA Option Down Payment
Amount
shall be credited to BUYER for any future purchasing contract by BUYER from SELLER of any equipment or machinery manufactured by SELLER which is not included under this Contract (such new equipment's or machinery's total price shall be agreed by the parties hereto in good faith).
|
|
d.
|
Payment Terms of the USA Plant Contract Price:
as set forth in Section 2 of Exhibit X.
|
|
e.
|
Delivery terms:
in case Buyer shall exercise its right to purchase the USA Plant, Supplier shall supply the USA Plant in accordance with the terms set forth in the Contract and the time schedule set forth in Section 4.4(2) of Exhibit I.
|
|
f.
|
Unless specifically otherwise is mentioned, all other terms and conditions of the Contract shall apply to the USA Plant, with necessary changes (if there are any).
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
2.
|
Option to purchase Tiles Cutting Line.
Buyer shall have a right to purchase the Tiles Cutting Line, under the following terms and conditions:
|
|
a.
|
Option Term:
3 years as of the date of this Contract Coming into Force Date during which time the BUYER is entitled to notify SELLER of the Tiles Cutting Line Exercise Notice.
|
|
b.
|
Tiles Cutting Line Contract Price
: as set forth in Section 17.1(iii) of the Contract. In the event the Buyer shall not submit to SELLER the Tiles Cutting Line Exercise Notice within 2 years as of the date of this Contract Coming into Force Date, the Tiles Cutting Line Contract Price will be updated in accordance with the change of the the index as stated in ISTAT publication “Tabella 3. “Indice generale dei prezzi alla produzione dei prodotti industriali venduti sul mercato estero”, where the base index for the price updating calculation is equal to 113,5 as it is the value of that index at the date of this Contract Coming into Effect .
|
|
c.
|
Payment Terms of the Tiles Cutting Line Contract Price:
as set forth in Section 3 of Exhibit X.
|
|
d.
|
Delivery terms:
in case Buyer shall exercise its right to purchase the Tiles Cutting Line, Supplier shall supply the Tiles Cutting Line in accordance with the terms set forth in the Contract and the time schedule set forth in Section 4.4(3) of Exhibit I.
|
|
e.
|
Unless specifically otherwise is mentioned, all other terms and conditions of the Contract shall apply to the Tiles Cutting Line, with necessary changes (if there are any).
|
3.
|
Option to purchase Biolenic Equipment.
Buyer shall have a right to purchase the Biolenic Equipment, under the following terms and conditions:
|
|
a.
|
Option Term:
3 years as of the date of this Contract Coming into Force Date during which time the BUYER is entitled to notify SELLER of the Biolenic Equipment Exercise Notice.
|
|
b.
|
Biolenic Equipment Plant Contract Price
: as set forth in Section 17.1(iv) of the Contract. In the event the Buyer shall not submit to SELLER the Biolenic Equipment Exercise Notice within 2 years as of the date of this Contract Coming into Force Date, the Biolenic Equipment Contract Price will be updated in accordance with the change the index as stated in ISTAT publication “Tabella 3. “Indice generale dei prezzi alla produzione dei prodotti industriali venduti sul mercato estero” , where the base index for the price updating calculation is equal to 113,5 as it is the value of that index at the date of this Contract Coming into Effect.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
|
c.
|
Payment Terms of the Tiles Cutting Line Contract Price:
as set forth in Section 4 of Exhibit X.
|
|
d.
|
Delivery terms:
in case Buyer shall exercise its right to purchase the Biolenic Equipment, Supplier shall supply the Biolenic Equipment in accordance with the terms set forth in the Contract and the time schedule set forth in Section 4.4(4) of Exhibit I.
|
|
e.
|
Unless specifically otherwise is mentioned, all other terms and conditions of the Contract shall apply to the Biolenic Equipment, with necessary changes (if there are any).
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
1.
|
Bar Lev Plant
|
(i)
|
[***]%
of the Bar Lev Plant Contract Price will be paid as down payment, against Buyer's receipt from Supplier of an invoice and a bank guarantee by a first class Italian bank of the same amount
for the reimbursement of the said payment ("
Bar Lev Advance Payment
");
|
(ii)
|
[***]%
of the Bar Lev Plant Contract Price will be paid through an irrevocable Letter of Credit, which shall be issued by Buyer's Israeli bank (Bank Mizrachi or Bank Leumi) , within [***] days from the Coming into Force date of this Contract, against issue of the Performance Bond, and will be payable as follows:
|
a.
|
[***]%
of the Bar Lev Plant Contract Price will be payable [***] ([***]) days from the date of the Forwarder Certificate of Receipt, against the documents specified in Section 5(a) herein;
|
b.
|
[***]%
of the Bar Lev Plant Contract Price will be payable [***] ([***]) days from the date of the Forwarder Certificate of Receipt if a Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant is issued by the Buyer by such time (upon presenting the documents specified in Section 5(a) herein and the Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant), and, if a Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant was not made by such time – payable within [***] days(upon presenting the documents specified in Section 5(a) herein);
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
2.
|
USA Plant
|
(i)
|
[***]%
of the USA Plant Contract Price will be paid as down payment within 7 working days of the USA Plant Exercise Notice, against Buyer's receipt from Supplier of an invoice and a bank guarantee by a first class Italian bank of the same amount
for the reimbursement of the said payment ("
USA Advance Payment
"); The bank guarantee shall be in the form as per specimen of Exhibit XI and in accordance with section 5e herein.
|
(ii)
|
[***]%
of the USA Plant Contract Price will be paid through a Letter of Credit, which shall be issued by Buyer's bank (Bank Mizrachi or Bank Leumi), within [***] days from the USA Plant Exercise Notice, against issue of the Performance Bond, and will be payable as follows:
|
a.
|
[***]%
of the USA Plant Contract Price will be payable [***] ([***]) days after the date of the Forwarder Certificate of Receipt, against the documents specified in Section 5(a) herein;
|
b.
|
[***]%
of the USA Plant Contract Price will be payable [***] ([***]) days from the date of the Forwarder Certificate of Receipt if a Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant is issued by the Buyer by such time (upon presenting the documents specified in Section 5(a) herein and the Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant), and, if a Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant was not made by such time (not due to Supplier breach of obligations) – payable within [***] ([***]) days (upon presenting the documents specified in Section 5(a) herein);
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
3.
|
Tiles Cutting Line
|
(i)
|
[***]%
of the Tiles Cutting Line Contract Price will be paid as down payment, within 7 working days of the Tiles Cutting Line Exercise Notice, against Buyer's receipt from Supplier of an invoice and a bank guarantee by a first class Italian bank of the same amount
for the reimbursement of the said payment; The bank guarantee shall be in the form as per specimen of Exhibit XI and shall be in accordance with section 5e herein.
|
(ii)
|
[***]%
of the Tiles Cutting Line Contract Price will be payable [***] ([***]) days from the date of the Forwarder Certificate of Receipt against the documents specified in Section 5(a) herein;
|
(iii)
|
[***]%
of the Tiles Cutting Line Contract Price will be payable [***] ([***]) days from the date of the Forwarder Certificate of Receipt if a Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant is issued by the Buyer by such time (upon presenting the documents specified in Section 5(a) herein and the Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant), and, if a Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant was not made by such time (not due to Supplier breach of obligations) – payable within [***] ([***]) days (upon presenting the documents specified in Section 5(a) herein);
|
4.
|
Biolenic Equipment
|
(i)
|
[***]%
of the Biolenic Equipment Contract Price will be paid as down payment, within 2 working days of the Biolenic Equipment Exercise Notice, against Buyer's receipt from Supplier of an invoice and a bank guarantee by a first class Italian bank of the same amount
for the reimbursement of the said payment;
|
(ii)
|
[***]%
of the Biolenic Equipment Contract Price will be payable [***] ([***]) days from the date of the Forwarder Certificate of Receipt against the documents specified in Section 5(a) herein;
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
5.
|
General
|
|
a.
|
The documents to be presented to the bank in order to receive payment under the L\C (or to the Buyer, in case of the Tiles Cutting Line and the Biolenic Equipment) are the following:
|
o
|
commercial invoices: one original and two copies;
|
o
|
Packing List: one original and two copies;
|
o
|
Forwarder Certificate of Receipt (to the designated destination): one original;
|
o
|
Certificate of origin issued by the Italian Chamber of Commerce: one original and two copies.
|
o
|
AND FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE LAST INSTALLEMENT EQUAL TO [***]% OF THE CONTRACT PRICE - Performance Bond at an amount equal to [***]% of the Contract Price, at a form per the specimen attached in Exhibit VIII.
|
|
b.
|
Letter of Credit which shall be issued in accordance with this Contract shall
be issued and regulated under the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits issued by the International Chamber of Commerce, Publication n. 600, last revision.
|
|
c.
|
In case of partial shipments, payment will be made under the LC after the Forwarder Certificate of Receipt for the final shipment and in accordance with section 5(a) above.
|
|
d.
|
The L/C shall be available by payment, at the scheduled payment dates, at the counters of the nominated bank.
|
|
e.
|
The L/C foresees may be confirmed by an Italian bank at Supplier’s decision and cost.
|
|
f.
|
Supplier shall bear all costs related to all bank guarantees which will be issued by Supplier to guarantee any down payment amount under this Contract.
|
|
g.
|
The bank guarantees issued by the Supplier to secure the aforementioned down payments, will be in accordance with the specimen in Exhibit IX.
|
EXHIBIT I
to Contract N° IS-110/12 dated October 18, 2012
between
BRETON SpA
and
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS AND PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF THE PLANT
&
DESCRIPTION OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES COMPOSING THE SUPPLY
|
1)
|
Functional Specifications And Production Capacity Of The Plant
|
2)
|
List of Machines, Equipment, Consumption Materials and Spare-parts if included in the Supply
|
3)
|
List of Technical Documentation
|
4)
|
List of Services
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM
|
1)
|
FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS AND PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF THE
PLANT
|
1.1)
|
FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PLANT
|
a)
|
THE PRODUCT AND ITS MAJOR COMPONENTS
|
¨
|
The
P
lant subject-matter of this Contract is designed for the manufacture of compound stone slabs
made by bonding together sands and grits of a simple natural quartz using unsaturated polyester resins dissolved in styrene.
|
¨
|
[***].
|
¨
|
As everybody knows, inert grits consist of small fragments of natural stone materials as well as of natural and artificial lithoid materials. The maximum diameter of the grits does not exceed [***] mm.
|
¨
|
Natural lithoid sands and grits can be obtained from shells, mother-of-pearl, madrepore and suchlike, while artificial lithoid materials include glass and ceramic grits, fragments of mirrors, etc.
|
¨
|
The most commonly used and widely diffused structural resin is [***] according to the most suitable formulations.
|
¨
|
The basic Plant, like the one supplied hereof, works normally under environmental temperatures ranging between [***]°C and [***]°C; any other environmental temperature is possible by equipping the plant with suitable machines and auxiliary plants.
|
|
b)
|
THE SLAB DIMENSIONS
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM
|
|
c)
|
THE SLAB THICKNESS
|
1.2)
|
PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF THE PLANT
|
a)
|
The manufacturing process is performed following a regular cadence which is fixed by the time [***] requires to [***] the slabs (for the sake of brevity, said time is defined “cycle time”).
|
b)
|
In plants equipped with just [***] group for the [***], the production could normally be arranged in [***] working shifts per day, seven days a week.
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM
|
c)
|
The plant utilization schemes specified in above point b) set forth the plant production capacity.
|
¨
|
[***];
|
¨
|
[***].
|
¨
|
[***].
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM
|
2)
|
LIST OF MACHINES, EQUIPMENT, CONSUMPTION MATERIALS AND/OR SPARE-PARTS IF INCLUDED IN THE SUPPLY
|
N.B.
|
Electric planning and marking of the electric components installed on Breton machines and equipment
.
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM
|
3)
|
LIST OF TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION
|
|
·
|
General layout of the plant;
|
|
·
|
Layout of the electrical, water and pneumatic feeding points, with specifications of the water and electric requirements;
|
|
·
|
Layout of foundations and standard working drawings of foundations, drawn up according to the [***] rules, dimensioned for a [***].
|
|
·
|
Operation and maintenance handbooks of machines and equipment and relevant electric diagrams, which shall include
operating and maintenance instructions with respect to the electric and mechanic aspects of the Plant, and any part of the Plant and spare parts lists.
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM
|
4)
|
LIST OF SERVICES
|
|
§
|
Installation and
Cold Tests
of
Plant
,
by
SUPPLIER
's
skilled technicians;
|
|
§
|
Hot Start-up
and
Performance Tests
of Plant, by
SUPPLIER
's skilled technicians;
|
|
§
|
Training to
BUYER
's personnel in charge with production, by the
SUPPLIER
's skilled technicians.
|
4.1)
|
INSTALLATION AND COLD TESTS OF PLANT
|
|
1)
|
Seller
, through his own technical personnel, will be responsible for the Installation and Cold Tests of the machines and equipment composing the Plant.
|
|
2)
|
Work sequence
|
a)
|
[***]
|
b)
|
[***]
|
c)
|
[***]
|
d)
|
[***]
|
3)
|
Time required
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM
|
4)
|
Additional expenses/services to be provided and paid by
Buyer
|
4.a)
|
[***]
|
4.b)
|
[***]
|
4.c)
|
[***]
|
4.d)
|
[***]
|
4.e)
|
[***]
|
4.f)
|
[***]
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM
|
4.g)
|
Technical supervision
|
4.2)
|
HOT START-UP AND PERFORMANCE TESTS OF PLANT
|
1)
|
Seller
, through his own technical personnel, will manage and operate the Hot Start-up and Performance Tests of the machines and equipment composing the Plant.
|
2)
|
Work sequence
|
a)
|
[***]
|
b)
|
[***]
|
c)
|
[***]
|
3)
|
Time required
|
4)
|
Additional expenses/services to be borne and paid by
Buyer
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM
|
4.3)
|
TRAINING TO BUYER'S PERSONNEL IN CHARGE WITH PRODUCTION, BY SUPPLIER'S SKILLED TECHNICIANS
|
|
1)
|
During the period of Hot Start-up and Performance Tests,
Seller
's technicians will carry out the practical training to
Buyer
's operational staff in charge with the Plant running relating to the operating and safety methods, cleaning and maintenance of the machines and equipment composing the Plant.
|
|
2)
|
For this purpose,
Buyer
will make available to
Seller
's technicians for the entire period of training, a minimum number of workers sufficient to carry out the normal operating, cleaning and maintenance of the machines and equipment composing the Plant.
|
|
3)
|
SELLER
shall conduct and maintain records in the Log Book of each training session, which shall include the content of each training session, its duration, the identity of the participants, the Seller's personnel who attended the training session.
SELLER
shall
record in the Log Book at the end of each Working Day about the aforementioned information.
|
4)
|
If, for any reason not due to
Seller
, the time required for the above training will last longer than foreseen,
Buyer
shall pay the amount fixed by [***].
|
4.4
)
|
Schedules for delivery, installation and performance and completion of any Test\Activity
|
1.
|
Bar Lev Plant
:
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM
|
2.
|
USA Plant
:
|
3.
|
Tiles Cutting Line
:
|
4.
|
Biolenic Equipment
:
|
_________________________________ | ___________________________ | |
BUYER
…………………………
CAESARSTONE – SDOT YAM
M. P. Menashe 37804 – Israel
|
SUPPLIER
Luca Toncelli (President)
BRETON S.P.A.
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italy)
|
EXHIBIT II
to Contract N° IS-110/12 dated October 18 , 2012
between
BRETON SpA
and
CAESARSTONE-SDOT YAM
SPECIMEN OF THE LOGBOOK
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "II" to the Contract dated October
1
8th
, 2012 between
BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE-SDOT YAM
|
In questo Libro Giornale sono registrati i lavori svolti presso il Sito……….. dal personale del Fornitore e dal personale del Compratore in suo ausilio, a partire dal giorno …., fino al giorno…
Questo Libro Giornale è un documento ufficiale contrattuale, le sue pagine sono numerate progressivamente da pag. 1 a pag. .., e va conservato secondo le regole stabilite nel Contratto
In this Logbook are registered the jobs performed in the Site………. by
Seller
’s personnel with the support of
Buyer
's personnel, from … to ……
This Logbook is an official contractual document; its pages are numbered from page 1 to page …, and must be kept according to the rules foreseen in the Contract
|
Firma del Capo Tecnico del Compratore | Signature of BUYER 's Chief Engineer | |
BRETON SPA
|
CAESARSTONE_SDOT YAM
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "II" to the Contract dated October 1
8th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE-SDOT YAM
|
EXHIBIT III
to Contract N° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012
between
BRETON SpA
and
CAESARSTONE-SDOT YAM
METHOD OF EXECUTION OF THE HOT START-UP OF THE PLANT
|
A)
|
TYPOLOGY OF THE MANUFACTURED BRETONSTONE PRODUCT
|
|
1)
|
During the period of Hot Start-up of the Bar Lev Plant and the USA Plant,
Supplier
will select among the typology listed below the slabs to be manufactured:
|
|
a)
|
Slabs with unfinished dimensions of approx.
[***]
x
[***]
cm (
[***]
x
[***]
for the USA Plant) and finished thickness
[***]
(
[***]
) cm, composed of aggregates with max. size
[***]
mm and
[***]
;
|
|
b)
|
Slabs with unfinished dimensions of approx.
[***]
x
[***]
cm (
[***]
x
[***]
for the USA Plant) and finished thickness
[***]
(
[***]
) cm, composed of aggregates with max. size
[***]
mm and
[***]
;
|
|
c)
|
Slabs with unfinished dimensions of approx.
[***]
x
[***]
cm (
[***]
x
[***]
for the USA Plant) and finished thickness
[***]
(
[***]
) cm, composed of aggregates with max. size
[***]
mm and
[***]
.
|
|
2)
|
The typology of the Tiles which will be produced during the Hot Start-up Test of the Tiles Cutting Line will be discussed in good faith between the parties following the Execution of the Tiles Cutting Line Exercise Notice.
|
B)
|
Amount of slabs\tiles per hour to be manufactured
|
C)
|
TIME REQUIRED FOR HOT START-UP
|
_________________________________ | ___________________________ | |
BUYER
…………………………
CAESARSTONE – SDOT YAM
M. P. Menashe 37804 – Israel
|
SUPPLIER
Luca Toncelli (President)
BRETON S.P.A.
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italy)
|
EXHIBIT IV
to Contract N° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012
between
BRETON SpA
and
CAESARSTONE SDOT YAM
GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
AND METHOD OF EXECUTION OF PERFORMANCE TESTS
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "IV" to the Contract Nr. IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT YAM
|
A)
|
GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
|
Bar Lev Molding lines
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
The above figures are granted with a tolerance of
[***]
%.
It is understood that
[***]
mixers capacity must be used to achive such figures.
The max capacity considered of each mixer is
[***]
(
[***]
) kg of mixture,
[***]
(
[***]
) kg totally mixture per batch.
The ratio between the mixtures prepared in the
[***]
mixers must be
[***]
%-
[***]
%.
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "IV" to the Contract Nr. IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT YAM
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "IV" to the Contract Nr. IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT YAM
|
|
¨
|
[***] ([***]) slabs measuring up to [***]x[***] cm, in [***] hours, when cutting slabs with net thickness up to [***] ([***]) mm;
|
|
¨
|
[***] ([***]) slabs measuring up to [***]x[***] cm, in [***] hours, when cutting slabs with net thickness from [***] ([***]) mm to [***] ([***]) mm.
|
|
¨
|
[***] ([***]) slabs measuring up to [***]x[***] cm, in [***] hours, when cutting slabs with net thickness from [***] ([***]) mm to [***] ([***]) mm.
|
A1)
|
GUARANTEE ON THE PRODUCT QUALITY FIGURES
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "IV" to the Contract Nr. IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT YAM
|
Reference Table |
CHARACTERISTICS OF BRETONSTONE
®
(DATA REFERRED TO SOME SAMPLES)
|
||||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
||
Aggregate nature
|
Quartz
|
Montorfano
Granite
|
Quartz
|
Quartz
|
Montorfano
Granite
|
standards
employed
for
testing
|
Aggregates max
. dimension (mm)
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
|
Type of binder
|
[***]
|
|||||
Specific weight (kg/dm
3
)
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Flexural strength (N/mm
2
)
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Water absorption (% by weight)
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Impact test (Joule)*
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Deep Abrasion Resistance (mm
3
)
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Freezing- thawing resistance (KM
f25
)
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Acids chemical resistance
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Thermal Shock:
Flexural. Strength. (ΔR %)
Mass loosing (ΔM %)
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Linear thermal expansion
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "IV" to the Contract Nr. IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT YAM
|
b)
|
Other quality guaranted figures of the polished slabs
|
|
-
|
[***]
|
|
-
|
[***]
|
|
-
|
[***]
|
|
-
|
[***]
|
|
-
|
[***]
|
c)
|
Tiles Cutting Line
|
B)
|
METHOD OF EXECUTION OF PERFORMANCE TEST
|
a)
|
[***]
|
b)
|
[***]
|
c)
|
[***]
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "IV" to the Contract Nr. IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE SDOT YAM
|
d)
|
[***]
|
e)
|
[***]
|
g)
|
[***]
|
B)
|
CONSUMPTION MATERIALS AND TOOLS
|
_________________________________ | ___________________________ | |
BUYER
…………………………
CAESARSTONE – SDOT YAM
M. P. Menashe 37804 – Israel
|
SUPPLIER
Luca Toncelli (President)
BRETON S.P.A.
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italy)
|
EXHIBIT V
to Contract N° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012
between
BRETON SpA
and
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM
SPECIMEN OF THE CERTIFICATE OF COLD TEST EXECUTED
|
BUYER 's Chief Engineer | SUPPLIER 's Chief Engineer | |
In the name and on behalf of BUYER | In the name and on behalf of SUPPLIER |
_________________________________ | ___________________________ | |
BUYER
…………………………
CAESARSTONE – SDOT YAM
M. P. Menashe 37804 – Israel
|
SUPPLIER
Luca Toncelli (President)
BRETON S.P.A.
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italy)
|
EXHIBIT VI
to Contract N° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012
between
BRETON SpA
and
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM
SPECIMEN OF THE CERTIFICATE OF HOT START-UP EXECUTED
|
BUYER 's Chief Engineer | SUPPLIER 's Chief Engineer | |
In the name and on behalf of BUYER | In the name and on behalf of SUPPLIER |
_________________________________ | ___________________________ | |
BUYER
…………………………
CAESARSTONE – SDOT YAM
M. P. Menashe 37804 – Israel
(Italia)
|
SUPPLIER
Luca Toncelli (President)
BRETON S.P.A.
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italy)
|
EXHIBIT VII
to Contract N° IS-110/12 dated October 18
th
, 2012
between
BRETON SpA
and
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM
SPECIMEN OF THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE OF PLANT
|
BUYER 's Chief Engineer | SUPPLIER 's Chief Engineer | |
In the name and on behalf of BUYER | In the name and on behalf of SUPPLIER |
_________________________________ | ___________________________ | |
BUYER
…………………………
CAESARSTONE – SDOT YAM
M. P. Menashe 37804 – Israel
(Italia)
|
SUPPLIER
Luca Toncelli (President)
BRETON S.P.A.
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italy)
|
EXHIBIT VIII to
Contract
N°
IS-110-12 dated October 18
th
2012
between BRETON and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM
SPECIMEN OF PERFORMANCE BOND GUARANTEE
|
-
|
On October 18
th
2012 a Contract for the supply of BRETONSTONE SLAB PLANTS and ADDITIONAL MACHINES, EQUIPMENT and SERVICES was signed between you and Breton S.p.A. - Via Garibaldi 27 - 31030 Castello di Godego (TV) Italy;
|
-
|
as per above Contract, Breton S.p.A. is obligated to issue in your favor a “Performance Bond Guarantee” for the amount of Euro [***] [***]) [[***]%OF THE CONTRACT PRICE]
(
hereinafter: the “
Principal Amount of the Guarantee
”).
|
_________________________________ | ___________________________ | |
BUYER
…………………………
CAESARSTONE – SDOT YAM
M. P. Menashe 37804 – Israel
|
SUPPLIER
Luca Toncelli (President)
BRETON S.P.A.
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italy)
|
EXHIBIT XI to Contract
N°
IS-110-12 dated October 18
th
2012
between BRETON and CAESARSTONE SDOT
-
YAM
SPECIMEN OF THE GUARANTEE FOR THE REIMBURSEMENT
OF THE PAYMENT IN ADVANCE
|
-
|
On October 18
th
2012 a Contract nr. IS 110-12 for the supply of BRETONSTONE SLAB PLANTS and ADDITIONAL MACHINES, EQUIPMENT and SERVICES was signed between you and Breton S.p.A. - Via Garibaldi 27 - 31030 Castello di Godego (TV) Italy;
|
-
|
As per above Contract, Breton S.p.A. is obligated to issue in your favor a “Bank Guarantee” for the amount of Euro [***] ([***]) [[***]% OF THE CONTRACT PRICE]
(
hereinafter: the “
Principal Amount of the Guarantee
”)
|
Cont’d:
|
EXHIBIT XI
to the Contract Nr.
IS 110-12 dated October 18
th
2012 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM Ltd.
|
_________________________________ | ___________________________ | |
BUYER
…………………………
CAESARSTONE – SDOT YAM
M. P. Menashe 37804 – Israel
|
SUPPLIER
Luca Toncelli (President)
BRETON S.P.A.
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italy)
|
Bar Lev Plant |
|
[***]
|
Bar Lev Plant |
Bar Lev Plant |
Bar Lev Plant |
Bar Lev Plant |
Bar Lev Plant |
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
Bar Lev Plant |
|
q
|
The machines composing the Groups "B" – "C" and "D" must be bounded with protection barriers, in conformity with the regulations in force in the Country where the plant has to be installed.
|
|
r
|
Breton
machines comply with the "Essential safety and health requirements as for the design and construction of machines and safety components" provided by the
98/37/CE Directives
.
|
Ø
|
metallic barriers, fixed to the ground, 140 or 200 cm in height;
|
Ø
|
photoelectric barriers with safety photoelectric cells;
|
Ø
|
access doors with key switches to stop the machines.
|
-
|
EMC directive
89/336 CEE
and its following amendment;
|
-
|
LVE directive
73/23 CEE
and its following amendment;
|
-
|
Directive
ATEX 94/9 CE
.
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
Tiles Cutting Line |
Tiles Cutting Line |
Between
|
BRETON S.p.A. (ITALY)
Via Garibaldi, 27
31030 Castello di Godego (TV) / Italy
(hereinafter referred to as "
BRETON
" or "
SUPPLIER
", alternatively)
|
and
|
CAESARSTONE SDOT
-
YAM LTD.
M. P. Menashe 37804 – Israel
(hereinafter referred to as "
BUYER
"
)
|
1.
|
Section 6.1 a) – the words "within May 1
st
2013" at the first paragraph shall be replaced by the words "within May 15, 2013".
|
2.
|
Section 17.1 – the Contract Price
with respect to the Bar Lev Plant shall be amended to
a total of Euro
[***] ([***]) (instead of Euro [***] as was stipulated in the Contract.
|
3.
|
Parties agree that Exhibit I to the Contract, shall be amended as following:
|
3.1
|
section 4.4 1. Shall be replaced with the following wording:
|
3.2
|
List of the Bar Lev Plant machines and equipment shall be amended as following:
|
_________________________
BUYER
CAESARSTONE – SDOT YAM LTD.
M. P. HEFER 38805 – Israel
|
__________________________
SUPPLIER
Giancarlo Crestani (Director)
BRETON S.P.A.
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italy)
|
1.
|
General
.
|
1.1.
|
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Main Agreement.
|
1.2.
|
Except for the changes and additions stated herein, the terms and conditions of the Main Agreement shall apply,
mutatis mutandis,
on the Machinery (as defined below).
|
1.3.
|
In any case of a contradiction between the provisions of this Addendum and the provisions of the Main Agreement with respect to the Machinery, the provisions of this Addendum shall prevail.
|
1.4.
|
All terms included in this Addendum, including but not limited to the definitions herein, shall apply only to the Machinery as
defined in Section
1.6.3
herein
and shall not change or deem to change the terms of the Main Agreement with respect to the Bar Lev Plant, the USA Plant, the Tiles Cutting Line or the Biolenic Equipment (as defined in the Main Agreement).
|
1.5.
|
For the avoidance of doubt, the Main Agreement shall remain valid and binding between the parties, according to its terms.
|
1.6.
|
Definitions:
|
1.6.1.
|
The "
Effective Date of this Addendum
" – the first date written above.
|
1.6.2.
|
The "
Guaranteed Performance Test Figures
" – the performances figures guaranteed by the Supplier, as specified in section
C
of
Exhibit I
.
|
1.6.3.
|
The "
Machinery
" – the machinery, control system and Services, as further detailed in
Exhibit I
herein, including without limitation all components therein and all related deliverables, and any and all documentation, technical manuals and instructions provided in connection thereto.
|
1.6.4.
|
The "
Services
" – all the related services with respect to the Machinery as specified in this Addendum and the Main Agreement, including without limitation, design services, installation, startup, testing, support, maintenance and training.
|
1.6.5.
|
The "
Specifications
" - all the technical specifications specified in sections A and B of
Exhibit I
of this Addendum.
|
2.
|
The Scope of Supply.
|
2.1.
|
Buyer shall purchase from Supplier and Supplier shall sell and provide Buyer the Machinery and the Services, in accordance with the terms and condition of this Addendum.
|
2.2.
|
Supplier obligates and warrants that the Machinery shall meet the Specification and the Guaranteed Performance Test Figures, commencing from the Completion of Cold Test, on a constant basis, without interruptions.
|
3.
|
Purchase Price and Payment Terms
.
As the sole and entire consideration for the purchase of the Machinery and the provision of the Services, including without limitation, the Warranty and all Supplier's undertakings under this Addendum, Buyer shall pay Supplier the amount of
[***] ([***])
euro (the “
Purchase Price
”), in accordance with the payment terms set forth in Section 1 of Exhibit X of the Main Agreement.
|
4.
|
Schedule of Deliveries
.
Supplier shall meet the schedules
set forth herein
.
|
4.1.
|
The Machinery shall be ready for delivery by the Supplier to the entrusted Forwarding Agent by December 23, 2013 (Machinery and Equipment Delivery Date (FCA Breton). Reasonable time before the expected delivery date of the Machinery to the Forwarding Agent (if possible no less than one month before the said date) Supplier shall notify Buyer in writing that the Machinery is ready to be delivered, in order to allow the Buyer to make the necessary arrangements for the delivery.
|
4.2.
|
Completion of Cold Test: within two calendar weeks after the Machinery have reached the Site.
|
4.3.
|
Date of Plant Delivery Completion: within two calendar weeks following the completion of the above Cold Test; that is within February 14 2014 considering that all Machineries are available on Site within January 12, 2014.
|
4.4.
|
Notwithstanding Section 6.1(b) of the Main Agreement, Supplier shall provide the technical documentation within the following time frames:
|
4.4.1.
|
The Layouts specified in Sections 6.1(b)(1)-(2) will be delivered by Supplier to Buyer
within 7 calendar days following the Effective Date of this Addendum.
The Layouts specified in Sections 6.1(b)(3)-(4) will be delivered by Supplier to Buyer
within 30 calendar days following the Buyer’s approval of the general layout as per Section 6.1(b)(1).
|
4.4.2.
|
The spare parts catalog and a List of recommended spare parts which will include the prices of each spare part, will be delivered by Supplier to Buyer
within 90 calendar days following the Effective Date of this Addendum. Supplier shall provide the spare parts catalog, in two hard copies, in English, and one copy on magnetic media.
|
4.4.3.
|
The Operation and maintenance handbooks of machines and equipment and relevant electric diagrams and spare parts will be supplied by the Supplier with the Machinery.
|
4.4.4.
|
No penalties, as per article 6.3 of the Main Agreement, will be applied to this supply for any delays on either delivery of equipment or “Completion of Cold Test” or “Plant Delivery Completion”.
|
5.
|
Tests
.
|
5.1.
|
Supplier shall manage, operate and be responsible for the Installation and the Cold Tests, the Hot Start-up Test and the Performance Test (the "
Tests
") of the Machinery, for no additional consideration, in accordance with the terms and conditions herein and of the Main Agreement.
|
5.2.
|
During the Installation and the Cold Test one of Breton's electricians and one of Breton's technicians will be present at Buyer's premises to conduct the Installation and the Cold Test.
During the Hot Start-up Test and the Performance Test one of Breton's representatives will be present at Buyer's premises to conduct the Hot Start-up Test and the Performance Test.
|
5.3
|
Buyer shall also pay for the expenses during the above activities, as per article 4.1 (4)(a) –(d) in Exhibit “I” of the Main Agreement, against valid receipts and invoices which shall be provided to Buyer.
|
5.4
|
Buyer shall provide the services specified in articles 4.1(4)(e)–(f) in Exhibit “I” of the Main Agreement, but shall provide and pay for at least
[***]
mechanics,
[***]
skilled electricians and
[***]
general workers (and not
[***]
mechanics,
[***]
skilled electricians and
[***]
general workers, as with mentioned in the Main Agreement).
|
6.
|
All other terms and conditions with respect to the Machinery, such as Supplier General Warranty, Insurance, Training and liabilities and obligations of the parties, will be,
mutatis mutandis
, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Main Agreement with respect to the Bar-Lev Plant.
|
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD.
Name:
Title:
|
BRETON S.P.A.
Name:
Crestani Giancarlo
Title:
Director
|
A.
|
EQUIPMENT LIST
|
Distinguishing features: | ||
· | [***] | |
· | [***] | |
· | [***] | |
· | [***] | |
· | [***] | |
· | [***] | |
· | [***] | |
· | [***] | |
· | [***] | |
· | [***] | |
· | [***] |
[***]
|
||
[***]
|
mm
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
mm
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
mm
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
mm
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
n.
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
n.
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
mm
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
mm
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
kW
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
kW
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
kW
|
[***]
|
q
|
The machines composing the Group "E" must be bounded with protection barriers, in conformity with the regulations in force in the Country where the plant has to be installed.
|
r
|
Breton machines comply with the "Essential safety and health requirements as for the design and construction of machines and safety components" provided by the
200/42/CE Directives
.
|
Ø
|
metallic barriers, fixed to the ground, 140 or 200 cm in height;
|
Ø
|
photoelectric barriers with safety photoelectric cells;
|
Ø
|
access doors with key switches to stop the machines.
|
Moreover
Breton
machines comply with the instructions coming from the following directives:
|
EMC directive
89/336 CEE
and its following amendment;
|
B.
|
SPECIFICATIONS
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
C.
|
GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
|
1.
|
Test
Tests - the Method of execution of the Performance
|
a) The verification of the production capacity of the polishing machines will be carried out in
[***]
days (in order to
[***]
, as per the above table).
|
b) Each of the
[***]
Performance Tests (in order to
[***]
, as per the above table) will last for
[***]
working hours.
|
c) At the beginning of each of the Performance Tests, the suitable tools must be already arranged and positioned; the finishing line must be already set and cleaned from any residues of the previous working day.
|
d) The calculation of time and slabs will start from the
[***]
slab coming out from the polishing machine.
|
e) The stop time due to reasons not attributable to S
UPPLIER
(i.e. tool change, lack of electric power..) will be deducted from total time.
|
2.
|
During the Performance Test the Machinery will serve the number of slabs set forth in the third table in Section A) of Exhibit IV of the Main Agreement, which are brought herein for sake of convenient and clarity:
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD.
Name:
Yos Shiran
Title:
CEO
|
BRETON S.P.A.
Name:
Crestani Giancarlo
Title:
Director
|
|
1.
|
Geneal
.
|
|
1.1.
|
The preamble of this Addendum and its exhibits constitute an integral part thereof.
|
|
1.2.
|
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Main Agreement.
|
|
1.3.
|
Except for the changes and additions stated herein, the terms and conditions of the Main Agreement shall apply,
mutatis mutandis,
on the Machinery (as defined below).
|
|
1.4.
|
The Machinery and the Machinery as defined in Addendum No. 1 shall be deemed as included in the definition of the Bar-Lev Plant under the Main Agreement.
|
|
1.5.
|
In any case of a contradiction between the provisions of this Addendum and the provisions of the Main Agreement with respect to the Machinery, the provisions of this Addendum shall prevail.
|
|
1.6.
|
All terms included in this Addendum, including but not limited to the definitions herein, shall apply only to the Machinery as defined in Section 1.8.3 herein and shall not change or deem to change the terms of the Main Agreement or the terms of Addendum No. 1 with respect to the Bar Lev Plant, the USA Plant, the Tiles Cutting Line or the Biolenic Equipment or the Xolar Machinery (as defined therin).
|
|
1.7.
|
For the avoidance of doubt, the Main Agreement and Addendum No. 1 shall remain valid and binding between the parties, according to their terms.
|
1.8.
|
Definitions:
|
1.8.1.
|
The "
Effective Date of this Addendum
" – the first date written above.
|
1.8.2.
|
The "
Guaranteed Performance Test Figures
" – the performances figures guaranteed by the Supplier, as specified in this Addendum.
|
1.8.3.
|
The "
Machinery
" – the calibration and ancillary machinery and Services, as further detailed in
Exhibit I
herein, including without limitation all components therein and all related deliverables, and any and all documentation, technical manuals and instructions provided in connection thereto.
|
1.8.4.
|
The "
Services
" – all the related services with respect to the Machinery as specified in this Addendum and the Main Agreement, including without limitation, design services, installation, startup, testing, support, maintenance and training.
|
1.8.5.
|
The "
Spare Parts
" – the spare parts specified in Exhibit II which shall be added to this Addendum.
|
1.8.6.
|
The "
Specifications
" - all the technical specifications specified in sections A and B of
Exhibit I
of this Addendum.
|
|
2.
|
The Scope of Supply.
|
|
2.1.
|
Buyer shall purchase from Supplier and Supplier shall sell and provide Buyer the Machinery, Spare Parts and the Services, in accordance with the terms and condition of this Addendum.
|
|
2.2.
|
Supplier obligates and warrants that the Machinery shall meet the Specification and the Guaranteed Performance Test Figures specified in Section C of Exhibit I of addendum No.1 dated July 4
th
2013, commencing from the Completion of Cold Test, on a constant basis, without interruptions.
|
|
2.3.
|
The Guaranteed Performance Test Figures of Bar-Lev Plant shall be amended so it shall also include the figures set forth in Exhibit IV of the Main Agreement with respect to the USA Plant Processing line.
|
|
2.4.
|
Spare Parts. It is agreed that at the time of supply of the Machinery under this Addendum, the Supplier shall supply to the Buyer the Spare Parts, in accordance with the specifications, price, payment terms and other relevant terms as shall be determined by both parties and set forth in
Exhibit II
. In order for the Seller to supply the Spare Parts with the Machinery, Exhibit II needs to be signed within November 30 2013, by both parties hereto and attached to this Addendum; Supplier shall send Buyer the list if suggested Spare Parts with relevant prices within November 15, 2013.
|
|
3.
|
Purchase Price and Payment Terms
.
|
|
3.1.
|
As the sole and entire consideration for the purchase of the Machinery and the provision of the Services, including without limitation, the Warranty and all Supplier's undertakings under this Addendum, Buyer shall pay Supplier the amount of
[***] ([***])
euro (the “
Purchase Price
”), in accordance with the payment terms set forth herein.
|
|
3.2.
|
The Machinery will be delivered to Buyer according to CFR (incoterms 2010) to Haifa Port. The Purchase Price includes also an amount of Euro
[***]
(
[***]
) for the estimated transportation costs from Breton to Haifa port (CFR (Incoterms 2010)) (the "
Estimated Transport Cost
").; After all the Machinery will be delivered from Supplier, Supplier shall inform Buyer about the final transportation total costs it paid (the "
Actual Transport Cost
"). The difference between the Actual Transport Cost and the Estimated Transport Cost (calculated only by the relevant invoices received by Supplier and sent to Buyer) shall be balanced either by Buyer or by Supplier by bank transfer within 40 calendar days of Seller's notice. Seller undertakes to ship the Machinery using a forwarder that will include direct shipping and shortest time table shipping services.
|
|
4.
|
Schedule of Deliveries
.
Supplier shall meet the schedules
set forth herein
.
|
|
4.1.
|
The Machinery and the Spare Parts shall be ready for delivery by the Supplier to the entrusted Forwarding Agent by March 14, 2014 (Machinery and Equipment Delivery Date).
|
|
4.2.
|
Completion of Cold Test: within three calendar weeks after the Machinery have reached the Site.
|
|
4.3.
|
Date of Plant Delivery Completion: within two calendar weeks following the completion of the above Cold Test; that is until May 5th 2014 considering that all Machineries are available on Site by March 31, 2014.
|
4.4.
|
Notwithstanding Section 6.1(b) of the Main Agreement, Supplier shall provide the technical documentation within the following time frames:
|
4.4.1.
|
The Layouts specified in Sections 6.1(b)(1)-(2) will be delivered by Supplier to Buyerwithin 14 calendar days following the Effective Date of this Addendum.
The Layouts specified in Sections 6.1(b)(3)-(4) will be delivered by Supplier to Buyerwithin 30 calendar days following the Buyer’s approval of the general layout as per Section 6.1(b)(1).
|
4.4.2.
|
The spare parts catalog and a List of recommended spare parts which will include the prices of each spare part, will be delivered by Supplier to Buyerwithin 15/11/2013. Supplier shall provide the spare parts catalog, in two hard copies, in English, and one copy on magnetic media.
|
4.4.3.
|
The Operation and maintenance handbooks of machines and equipment and relevant electric diagrams and spare parts will be supplied by the Supplier with the Machinery.
|
|
5.
|
Payment Terms
|
5.1.
|
The Purchase Price will be paid by the Buyer as follows:
|
5.1.1.
|
[***]
% of the Purchase Price will be paid as down payment, against Buyer's receipt from Supplier of an invoice and a bank guarantee by a first class Italian bank of the same amount for the reimbursement of the said payment (the "
Advance Payment
");
|
5.1.2.
|
[***]
% of the Purchase Price will be paid through an irrevocable Letter of Credit, which shall be issued by Buyer's Israeli bank (Bank Mizrachi or Bank Leumi), within
[***]
calendar days from the Effective Date, upon the receipt by Buyer from Seller of the Performance Bond (as defined in the Main Agreement), and will be payable as follows:
|
5.1.2.1.
|
[***]
% of the Purchase Price will be payable
[***]
(
[***]
) days from the date of the Forwarder Certificate of Receipt, against the documents specified in Section 5(a) of Exhibit X of the Main Agreement;
|
5.1.2.2.
|
[***]
% of the Purchase Price will be payable
[***]
(
[***]
) days from the date of the Forwarder Certificate of Receipt if a Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant is issued by the Buyer by such time (upon presenting the documents specified in Section 5(a) of Exhibit X of the Main Agreement and the Final Acceptance Certificate of the Machinery), and, if a Final Acceptance Certificate of the Machinery was not made by such time – payable within
[***]
days (upon presenting the documents specified in Section 5(a) of Exhibit X of the Main Agreement);
|
|
6.
|
Tests
.
|
6.1.
|
Supplier shall manage, operate and be responsible for the Installation and the Cold Tests, the Hot Start-up Test and the Performance Test (the "
Tests
") of the Machinery, for no additional consideration, in accordance with the terms and conditions herein and of the Main Agreement.
|
6.2.
|
It is hereby clarified that the time schedule for the Tests and the Plant Delivery Completion Date of the Machinery as set forth in Addendum No. 1 of the Main Agreement dated July 4
th
, 2013 (i.e., the delivery schedule for the Xolar machines) shall not be delayed or otherwise affected by this Addendum No. 2 and its performance, and the Machinery as it is defined in Addendum No. 1 shall be installed and fully operated at the dates set forth in Addendum No. 1 with not change.
|
6.3.
|
During the Installation and the Cold Test at least one of Breton's electricians and one of Breton's technicians will be present at Buyer's premises to conduct the Installation and the Cold Test.
|
6.4.
|
Buyer shall also pay for the expenses during the above activities, as per article 4.1 (4)(a) –(d) in Exhibit “I” of the Main Agreement, against valid receipts and invoices which shall be provided to Buyer.
|
|
7.
|
All other terms and conditions with respect to the Machinery, such as Supplier General Warranty, Insurance, Training and liabilities and obligations of the parties, will be,
mutatis mutandis
, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Main Agreement with respect to the Bar-Lev Plant.
|
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD.
Name:
Yos Shiran
Title:
CEO
|
BRETON S.P.A.
Name:
Crestani Giancarlo
Title:
Director
|
|
A.
|
[***]
|
Pos.
|
E6)
|
|
[***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E7)
|
[***] [***]
|
|
Distinguishing features:
|
· | [***] | |
·
|
[***] | |
· | [***] | |
· | [***] | |
· | [***] | |
· | [***] | |
· | [***] | |
· | [***] |
|
§
|
[***]
|
|
§
|
[***]
|
|
§
|
[***]
|
|
§
|
[***]
|
|
§
|
[***]
|
|
§
|
[***]
|
|
[***][***]
|
|
[***][***]
|
[***] | |||||
[***] | mm | [***] | |||
[***] | mm | [***] | |||
[***] | mm | [***] | |||
[***] | mm | [***] | |||
[***] | n. | [***] | |||
[***] | n. | [***] | |||
[***] | kW | [***] | |||
[***] | kW | [***] | |||
[***] | kW | [***] | |||
[***] | m/min | [***] | |||
[***] | mm | [***] | |||
[***] | |||||
[***] |
|
-
|
[***]
|
|
-
|
[***]
|
Pos.
|
E8)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E9)
|
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E10)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E11)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E12)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E13)
|
n.
[***] [***]
|
|
[***]
:
|
·
|
[***]
|
·
|
[***]
|
·
|
[***]
|
·
|
[***]
|
·
|
[***]
|
·
|
[***]
|
·
|
[***]
|
·
|
[***]
|
|
[***][***]
|
|
[***][***]
|
|
[***][***]
|
|
[***][***]
|
|
[***][***]
|
|
[***][***]
|
|
[***][***]
|
|
¨
|
|
¨
|
[***]
|
|
¨
|
[***]
|
|
¨
|
[***]
|
|
¨
|
[***]
|
|
¨
|
[***]
|
|
¨
|
[***]
|
|
¨
|
[***]
|
|
¨
|
[***]
|
|
¨
|
[***]
|
|
¨
|
|
|
-
|
[***]
|
|
-
|
[***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E14)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E15)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E16)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E17)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E18)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E19)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E20)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E21)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E22)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E23)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E24)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E25)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
q
|
The machines composing the Group “E” must be bounded with protection barriers, in conformity with the regulations in force in the Country where the plant has to be installed.
|
r
|
Breton
machines comply with the “Essential safety and health requirements as for the design and construction of machines and safety components” provided by the
200/42/CE Directives
.
|
|
Ø
|
metallic barriers, fixed to the ground, 140 or 200 cm in height;
|
|
Ø
|
photoelectric barriers with safety photoelectric cells;
|
|
Ø
|
access doors with key switches to stop the machines.
|
|
-
|
EMC directive
89/336 CEE
and its following amendment;
|
|
-
|
LVE directive
73/23 CEE
and its following amendment;
|
|
-
|
Directive
ATEX 94/9 CE.
|
|
B.
|
SPECIFICATIONS
|
|
-
|
a rough thickness not higher than
[***]
mm of the finished thickness of the polished slabs.
|
CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD.
Name:
Title:
|
BRETON S.P.A.
Name:
Crestani Giancarlo
Title:
Director
|
|
1.
|
We hereby give you a notice of exercise of our right under section 2.2 to the Contract to purchase the USA Plant. All terms and conditions set in the Contract shall apply to the purchase and supply of the USA Plant, subject only to the following terms, which have been agreed between us prior to the date hereof:
|
|
2.
|
The Scope of the supply for the “USA Plant” has been updated by replacing the machine list as per Exhibit I of the Contract by the machine list attached to this notice as exhibit A.
|
|
3.
|
Section 17.1(ii) to the Contract has been amended by setting a Contract Price of
Euro
[***] ([***]) (the
"USA Plant Contract Price"
) (instead of Euro [***] as was stipulated in the Contract).
|
|
4.
|
Section 7.1 of the Contract has been amended so that the USA Plant shall be delivered to Buyer according to DAP (incoterm 2010) to Buyer's USA Site instead of FCA Breton (Incoterms 2010). Buyer shall reimburse Seller for its out-of-pocket documented expenses for the delivery of the USA Plant under the DAP (incoterm 2010) delivery terms. Seller undertakes to ship the USA Plant using a forwarder that will include a direct shipping and shortest time table shipping services.
|
|
5.
|
Option regarding the [***] -
|
|
6.
|
Section 6.1(b) of the Contract has been amended to set the dates for the supply of the layouts specified in Sections 6.1(b).2 and 3 (foundation layout), to October 11, 2013, without the drawing of the channels and to October 30, 2013 - including information about the channels. Said layouts, which have not been provided by the date of this notice, shall be delivered by Seller to Buyer within [***] ([***]) working days as of the date of this notice.
|
|
7.
|
Any capitalized term not defined herein shall have the same meaning ascribed to it in the Contract. Except as set forth herein, no other changes are made to the Contract.
|
Sincerely,
_______________________
CAESARSTONE SDOT–YAM LTD.
|
Pos.
|
A.
1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
A.
2)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
A. 3)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
A.
4)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
A.
5)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
A. 6)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
A. 7)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
A. 8)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
A. 9)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B.
1)
|
n.
[***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B.
2)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B. 3)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B. 4)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B. 5)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B. 6)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B. 7)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B. 7/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B. 8)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B. 8/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B. 8/2)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B. 9)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B. 10)
|
n [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B.10/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B. 11)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B.
12)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B.12/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B. 13)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
B. 14)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
C. 1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
C. 2)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
C. 2/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
C. 3)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
C. 4)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
C. 5)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 2)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 3)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 3/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 4)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 5)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 6)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 7)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 8)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 9)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 10)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 11)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 12)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 13)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 14)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 15)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 16)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
D. 17)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
n. [***] [***]
|
n. [***][***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 2)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 3)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 4)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 4/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 5)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 6)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 7)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 8)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 8/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 9)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 10)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 11)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 12)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 13)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 14)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E.14/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 15)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 16)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 17)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 18)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 19)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 20)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 21)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 22)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 23)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 24)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 25)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 26)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E.26/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 27)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 28)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 29)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 30)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E.
31)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E.31/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 32)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 33)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 34)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 35)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E.
36)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 37)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 38)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 39)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
E. 40)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
1.
|
Any capitalized term not defined herein shall have the same meaning ascribed to it in the Contract n° IS-110/12 dated October 18, 2012 as amended (the "
Contract
") and the Exercise Notice. Except as set forth herein, no other changes are made to the Contract or to Exercise Notice.
|
|
2.
|
Section 4.4 (2) of Exhibit I to the Contract, is hereby amended as following detailed in this section 2 to the Addendum.
|
-
|
Slab Moulding line, (Groups: “B”, “C” , excluding positions from B1 till B6 included and excluding pos. D11+D12+D13+D14+D15+D16): within July 15th, 2014
|
-
|
Slabs finishing line (Group “E”): within August 15th , 2014
|
-
|
New Catalysis Kilns line (from pos.D1 up to pos. D10 and pos. D17): within October 15th 2014.
|
-
|
Completion of Cold Test (as defined in section 3.39 in the Contract): November 30
th
, 2014.
|
-
|
Plant Delivery Completion (as defined in section 3.38 in the Contract): February 1
th
, 2015.
|
3.
|
Section 4 of the Exercise Notice shall be considered null; delivery terms will remain FCA Breton as per article 7 of the original Contract. However, Caesarstone shall have the right to change the delivery terms to CIP (Incoterms 2010) Caesarstone's site at Belfast Center, Richmond Hill, Georgia, USA, upon giving the Supplier a written notice within end of March 2014. During February and March 2014 Supplier shall send to Caesarstone quotations, suggested forwarders and all needed specification (delivery routes…) for CIP delivery. In case Caesarstone should decide to change delivery terms to such CIP terms, the following terms shall apply: a) the FCA (Incoterm 2010) Contract Price of the USA Plant and the Letter of Credit amount (see payment terms of the Contract) shall be increased by the additional direct expenses for CIP delivery, as confirmed by Caesarstone (it is clarified that Supplier shall use forwarders and delivery routes as may be requested by Caesarstone). b) Seller shall engage the forwarders and the shipment specifications (delivery routes…) as agreed between the parties. c) Supplier shall supervise the unloading operations from the containers of the US Plant at the Buyer's site in Belfast Center in Richmond Hill, Georgia. Organization, responsibility and costs for the unloading operations from the containers remain at Caesarstone's charge. d) within seven calendar days following the vessel departure, Supplier shall provide Buyer with a copy of all documents and Information required for the import (custom clearance) of such machines and equipment.
|
4.
|
Changes to Scope of Supply.
|
4.1
|
Buyer has decided not to purchase the entire [***] and the [***] and relevant [***] from pos. B1 to pos. B6 included in Exhibit A under the Exercise Notice.
|
4.2
|
In addition, Buyer has decided and Supplier has agreed to make some modifications of the equipment composing the “Continuous Bretonstone Quartz Slab Processing Line” of the USA Plant, and such change adds to the USA Plant Price as indicated in the Exercise Notice an amount of Euro [***].
|
4.3
|
The machine list attached herein as
Exhibit A
entirely replaces the machine list that was attached as Exhibit A of the Exercise Notice and shall constitute the new and replaced scope of supply with respect to the USA Plant.
|
|
5.
|
Guaranteed Performance Test Figures.
Supplier shall remain committed to the US Plant meeting the Guaranteed Performance Test Figures, subject only to failure to meet Guaranteed Performance Test Figures which originates directly from the [***] that Buyer shall use, instead of the [***]. Subject only to the aforementioned, nothing herein (including without limitation the change in the scope of supply) shall derogate from Supplier's liabilities and responsibilities set forth in the Contract.
|
|
6.
|
Contract Price.
Section 3 of the Exercise Notice (and therefore Section 17.1(ii) to the Contract) are amended as follows:
|
|
7.
|
USA Advance Payment
. Section 2(i) of exhibit X to the Contract is amended hereby as following: the USA Advance Payment, in the anmount of EURO [***]
[(
[***]
%)
[***]
-
[***]
=
[***]
]
will be paid by the Buyer within 7 working days as of the date of this Addendum, against the issuance and provision by the Supplier of a Bank Guarantee in the same amount and as per specimen in Exhibit XI of the Contract.
|
|
8.
|
Section 6 of the Exercise Notice is hereby cancelled. Supplier shall continue to support Buyer with any additional drawings as may be reasonably needed.
|
|
9.
|
For the sake of good order it is hereby clarified that this addendum does not derogate from the validity of the Exercise Notice and that the terms and conditions of the Contract and the Exercise Notice shall continue to apply except as specifically changed in this Addendum. Without derogating from the generality of the aforementioned, it is clarified that the binding date of the Exercise Notice remains November 6, 2013.
|
_______________________________________________
|
_______________________________________________ |
Giancarlo Crestani (Director)
|
Yos Shiran ( CEO)
|
BRETON S.P.A.
|
Caesarstone Sdot Yam LTD
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
7)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
7/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
8)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
8/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
8/2)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
9)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
10)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
10/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
11)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
12)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
12/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
13)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
14)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Pos.
|
C.
|
1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
C.
|
2)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
C.
|
2/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
C.
|
3)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
C.
|
4)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
C.
|
5)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***].
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
-
|
[***]
|
___________________________________________________
BUYER
|
___________________________________________________
SUPPLIER
|
Yos Shiran – CEO
|
Giancarlo Crestani (Director)
|
CAESARSTONE – SDOT YAM
|
BRETON S.P.A.
|
M. P. HEFER 38805 – Israel
|
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italy)
|
Between
|
BRETON S.p.A. (ITALY)
|
and
|
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC
.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
q
|
BUYER
has decided to set-up a second industrial facility (seventh at Caesarstone Group) for the manufacturing and processing of compound stone slabs
made by bonding together grits and powders of inert materials with unsaturated polyester resins dissolved in styrene, using the Bretonstone
®
System technology;
|
q
|
BRETON
is a world-famous manufacturer of plants, machinery and equipment for the production of engineered stone slabs using its own original technology and know-how;
|
q
|
BRETON
is the rightful and exclusive holder of rights to certain registered patents, relating to the Bretonstone System technology;
|
q
|
BUYER
has decided to purchase from
BRETON
and
BRETON
has decided to sell and provide
BUYER
nr. one Bretonstone® System plant (as described in Exhibit I°) for the production of engineered stone slabs using the Bretonstone® System technology, to be installed at the industrial facility located in
RICHMOND HILL
Georgia, USA (the "
Second USA Plant
"), in accordance with this Contract.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
1.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
|
2.
|
CONSENT
|
2.1.
|
SUPPLIER
undertakes to produce, prepare and provide
BUYER
with, and
BUYER
accepts to buy from
SUPPLIER
the
Second USA Plant
(as such term is defined in the preamble of this Contract), and all documentation, machinery, equipment and services stated in this Contract and its Exhibits, in compliance with the provisions of this Contract and any Exhibits hereof.
|
3.
|
GENERAL CONDITIONS AND DEFINITIONS
|
3.1.
|
This Contract includes the following General Conditions and Definitions, along with specific clauses outlining obligations and rights of the
Parties
. The following words and expressions shall have the meaning stated below, except where the context otherwise requires.
|
3.2.
|
The
Parties
hereby mutually agree that they shall refer, and as far as possible cause others to refer, to this Contract as "
Contract N° [________] dated June 5, 2014
", in any correspondence and official documentation.
|
3.3.
|
"Article"
means Article of the Contract. Any heading of articles are for convenience only.
|
3.4.
|
"Approval"
and
"Approved"
mean approval or approved in writing, or verbal approval subsequently approved in writing.
|
3.5.
|
"
BUYER
"
means
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
and/or any of its Affiliates as maybe designed by Buyer and includes, in accordance with the context of the Contract hereof, lawful successors and assignees.
|
3.6.
|
"
SUPPLIER
" or "
SELLER
" means
BRETON SpA
and includes, in accordance with the context of the Contract hereof, (a) its legal representatives, or lawful successors and assignees; (b) "
SUPPLIER
's Chief Engineer" as later specified; and (c) SUPPLIER's Technical Staff working at Site.
|
3.7.
|
"
BUYER's Chief Engineer
" means Mr. Gadi Livne BUYER expressly approves his conduct with respect to engineering matters related to the installation of the Plant at the BUYER’s site. BUYER shall be entitled to replace the appointed Buyer’s Chief Engineer and shall notify, in advance (if possible), to the SUPPLIER in writing about the new BUYER’s Chief Engineer.
|
3.8.
|
"
SUPPLIER
's
Chief Engineer
" means Mr. Gianfranco Comacchio, the person in charge appointed by
SUPPLIER
to manage in his name and for his account all the operating relations with
BUYER
and/or with "
BUYER
's Chief Engineer" at
Site
, during the implementation of this Contract. Prior to the installation of Plant at Site,
SUPPLIER
shall indicate in writing to
BUYER
the person in charge appointed as
SUPPLIER
's
Chief Engineer
, and expressly approves his conduct.
SUPPLIER
shall be entitled to recall the appointed Chief Engineer on Site by notifying the BUYER in writing in advance (if possible) and he shall concurrently appoint an adequate person to serve as the SUPPLIER’s Chief Engineer, including the deputy.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
3.9.
|
"Parties"
means
BUYER
and
SUPPLIER
.
|
3.10.
|
"
Contract
" or "
Agreement
" means this agreement including all articles/exhibits referred to herein or attached hereto.
|
3.11.
|
"
Contract Price
" means the amount specified in article
16 herein.
|
3.12.
|
"
Scope of Supply
" means drawings, machinery, equipment, know-how transfer, software and any ancillary machinery, equipment, information and data, license, rights, services, the achievement of the performance contemplated by the relevant machineries and any Supplier's commitment under this Contract, that
SUPPLIER
shall supply/make available to
BUYER
under this Contract, including without limitation, the Technical Documentation to be provided by the
SUPPLIER
in accordance with Section 6.1(b) herein, all as specified in Exhibit I of this Contract and anywhere else in this Contract and as required for the full successful operation of the Plant (as defined below) supplied by SUPPLIER to BUYER under this Agreement.
|
3.13.
|
"
Industrial Facility
" means the plant, equipment, machinery, facilities, materials, stocks, spare-parts and other items of all kinds, that each Party to this Contract shall make available in order to set up the industrial facility in the
Site
mentioned above, in accordance with the provisions agreed in this Contract.
|
3.14.
|
"
Plant
" means, all the machines and equipment which compose the technological lines for the manufacturing of the products, including the ancillary equipment and plants related to such lines and/or machines, as described or stated herein and as specified in the Scope of Supply.
|
3.15.
|
"
Specifications
" means the specifications contained in this Contract.
|
3.16.
|
"
Schedule of deliveries
" means the schedule of deliveries as per article
6 herein.
|
3.17.
|
"
Notice of Goods Ready
"
means the notice to be given in writing by
SUPPLIER
to
BUYER
, prior to each delivery of the Plant or any part thereof, in accordance with Section 29.1 of this Contract.
|
3.18.
|
Intentionally Omitted.
|
3.19.
|
"
Cold Tests
" mean testing of the Plant, or of any part thereof, in no-load conditions, in accordance with article
11 herein.
|
3.20.
|
"
Hot Start-up
" means the production of what is specified in
Exhibit III
, through the use of the
Plant
under
SUPPLIER
's supervision, in accordance with article
12 herein.
|
3.21.
|
"
Certificate of Hot Start-up Executed
" is the certificate to be issued by in accordance with article
12 herein.
|
3.22.
|
"
Performance Tests
" mean such tests to be carried out by
SUPPLIER
with
BUYER
's effective co-operation, in order to check the compliance with the "
Guaranteed Performance Tests Figures
"
,
before the
Final Acceptance Certificate
of the Plant
is issued, all in accordance with article
13 herein.
|
3.23.
|
"
Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant
" shall mean the certificate to be issued by
SUPPLIER
and signed by the
Parties
after the successful completion of the
Performance Tests
, in accordance with article 13herein.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
3.24.
|
"
Guaranteed Performance Test Figures
" means the figures guaranteed by
SUPPLIER
as stated in article 12and 13herein and Exhibit III and Exhibit IV.
|
3.25.
|
"
Logbook
", as per Exhibit II, means the journal containing a detailed account of the work progress and the results relating to any tests conducted pursuant to this Contract. The
Logbook
shall be properly prepared, filled in and kept by
SUPPLIER'
s
Chief Engineer
.
|
3.26.
|
"
Trained Personnel
" or "
BUYER
's Designated Trained Personnel"
shall mean the employees to be specifically designated by
BUYER
for being trained by
SUPPLIER
pursuant to this Contract; such personnel shall be made available by
BUYER
at least from the date of beginning of the
Cold Tests
, unless any personnel replacements are made.
|
3.27.
|
"
Working Day
" means any day that is not considered as an official holiday in
SUPPLIER
's Country. During the implementation of works at
Site
under the
Contract
hereof, the working week shall be composed of at least five (5) working days out of seven (7) solar days, and “working day” shall mean any day. Without derogating from the abovementioned, the
Parties
shall agree upon which days out of the seven solar days are to be considered as working days.
|
3.28.
|
"
Warranty
" means the warranty covering the
Plant
as expressly stated under article
15 herein.
|
3.29.
|
"
Site
" means the land and other surrounding places on/through which the erection and installation of the
Plant
will be carried out and where the
Plant
will operate.
|
3.30.
|
"
Forwarding Agent
" means a forwarder as shall be designated by the Party designed according to the delivery terms of this Contract.
|
3.31.
|
"Trade Name
" means each of the
Seller's
and the
BUYER
's trademarks, logos, trade name, as the case may be.
|
3.32.
|
"Moulding Delivery Date" –
the date all the machines that constitute the Moulding Line are ready for delivery by Supplier to the Forwarding Agent and as notified by Supplier to Buyer.
|
3.33.
|
"Finishing Line Delivery Date" -
the date all the machines that constitute the Finishing Line are ready for delivery by Supplier to the Forwarding Agent and as notified by Supplier to Buyer.
|
3.34.
|
"Plant Delivery Completion" –
will be considered as occurred if a
Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant
had been issued in accordance with Section 13.4 herein.
|
3.35.
|
"
Completion of Cold Test
" – means finalizing the Cold Tests and achieving the parameters specified in Section 11.1.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
3.36.
|
"
Completion of Hot Start-up
"
-
means finalizing the Hot Start-up and achieving the parameters specified in Section 12.3.
|
3.37.
|
"Test(s)/Activity/(ies)
" - means any of the Inspection, Installation, Cold Tests, Hot Start-Up, Performance Tests, and any other derived or related procedure.
|
3.38.
|
"
Effective Date
" – the date in which the parties will sign this Agreement.
|
3.39.
|
The "
Electric and Control Systems
" – means the electric and control systems of the Second USA Plant, which will comply with the Buyer's specifications attached herein as
Exhibit IA
, and which will include, without limitation, the required communication hardware and software components for transmission of data to and from the Second USA Plant to the Buyer's [***] and [***] systems, and including the [***].
|
3.40.
|
The "
Finishing Line
" - the machinery and equipment specified in Group "E" of the Equipment list attached to Exhibit I.
|
3.41.
|
"[***]" – the [***] (specified under position [***] which will be manufactured by the Supplier in accordance with the specifications and drawings which will be provided to Supplier by Buyer, in accordance with Section
4.1.6 herein.
|
3.42.
|
"
Moulding Line
" – the machinery and equipment specified in Groups "A", "1A", "B", "C" and "D" of the equipment list attached to Exhibit I.
|
3.43.
|
"
Spare Parts
" –the spare parts which will be purchased by the Buyer and provided by the Seller in accordance with Section
4.1.7 of this Agreement..
|
4.
|
SUPPLIER'S OBLIGATIONS AND SCOPE OF SUPPLY
|
4.1.
|
SUPPLIER
shall, upon execution of this Contract, sell and supply all the drawings, Technical Documentation and any other documentation foreseen in this Contract, machinery and equipment and its control softwares as well as perform all the services within the "
Scope of Supply
", in accordance with any term of this Contract, including but not limited to
Exhibit
I
("
FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS AND PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF THE PLANT & DESCRIPTION OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES COMPOSING THE SUPPLY
"), namely:
|
|
4.1.1.
|
description of the Plant functional specifications and production capacity in accordance with paragraph 1) of
Exhibit I
;
|
|
4.1.2.
|
supply of machinery and equipment as mentioned under paragraph 2) of
Exhibit
I
;
|
|
4.1.3.
|
supply of Technical Documentation, as mentioned under paragraph 3) of
Exhibit
I
;
|
|
4.1.4.
|
supply of services as specified under paragraph 4) of
Exhibit
I
, namely:
|
|
§ a)
|
management and operation of installation and
Cold Tests
of
Plant
,
|
|
§ b)
|
management and operation of
Hot Start-up
and
Performance Tests
of
Plant
;
|
|
§ c)
|
Training to
BUYER
's personnel in charge with production.
|
|
4.1.5.
|
Electric and Control System.
|
|
4.1.5.1.
|
Not later than the date of issuance of the
Certificate of Cold Test Executed
, the Supplier shall provide the Buyer full access to the [***], by providing the [***] by CD to Buyer and by providing Buyer all relevant information and sufficient documentation which will allow Buyer to use and modify the [***], as the Buyer seems fit
.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
|
4.1.5.2.
|
Supplier shall provide Buyer with any amendment or adjustment that will be made to the [***] of the Electric and Control Systems, upon the performance of such amendment or adjustment by the Supplier, with all the relevant information and sufficient documentation to allow the Buyer to use and modify the source code, as the Buyer seems fit
.
|
|
4.1.5.3.
|
Supplier hereby grants the Buyer a worldwide, not-limited license, royalties free to use and modify the [***] of the Electric and Control Systems, in order to improve and fully and successfully operate the Second USA Plant.
|
|
4.1.6.
|
[***]
.
|
|
4.1.6.1.
|
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary mentioned herein, the [***] will be manufactured by the Supplier in accordance with specifications, designs and drawings which will be provided to Supplier by Buyer, promptly after the Coming into Effect Date of the Agreement.
|
|
4.1.6.2.
|
All the rights whatsoever in and with respect to the [***], including without limitation in and to the drawings, design, construction, specifications, know-how, menthods, procedures with resepct to the [***] and all the intelectuall property rights in connection thereto ("
[***]
Information
") shall remain the sole property of the Buyer and Supplier shall not be entitled to use in any way the [***] Information, except for the manufacturing of the [***] for the Buyer.
|
|
4.1.6.3.
|
Without derogating form Supplier's confidential obligations in accordance with the Non-Disclosure Agreement dated May 14, 2014 Supplier shall maintain all the [***] Information in complete confidence and shall not allow access to such information to any party, except to Supplier's employees who have a "need to know" and who must be directly involved in the production of the [***] and who shall be under a legal obligation to maintain such information in confidence with no time limitation.
|
|
4.1.6.4.
|
Within 3 working days of the Buyer written request, the Supplier shall provide the Buyer with all the original [***] Information he received from Buyer, and any copies thereof.
|
|
4.1.6.5.
|
Supplier will be responsible to notify Buyer, before the manufacturing of the
[***]
, of any problem in the design and\or the specifications and\or drawings of the
[***]
that Supplier finds out or should have reasonably be able to find out in the design of the
[***].
|
|
4.1.7.
|
Spare Parts.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
4.2
|
SUPPLIER’s personnel at the Site shall comply with BUYER’s safety and security procedures and instructions that BUYER shall be responsible to clearly illustrate to SUPPLIER’s personnel at Site.
|
5.
|
IMPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO THE SCOPE OF SUPPLY DURING EXECUTION
|
6.
|
SCHEDULE OF DELIVERIES
|
6.1.
|
SUPPLIER
shall make available all the documentation, machinery and equipment and perform all the services under this Contract in full compliance with the Scope of Supply and the
Schedule of deliveries
set forth below.
|
|
a)
|
Delivery Dates :
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
1)
|
Within seven (7) calendar days as from the Coming into Effect date of this Contract,
SELLER
shall submit to
BUYER
's approval the general layout of the
Plant
.
|
||
2)
|
Layout of the electrical, water (if applicable) and pneumatic feeding points, with specifications of the water (if applicable) and electric requirements
|
60 days
|
|
3)
|
Layout of foundations and standard working drawings of foundations
|
60 days
|
|
With respect to the Mixers foundation layouts and drawings– Following the receipt of the specification of the Mixers by Supplier from Buyer, Supplier will notify Buyer within 14 calendar days from the coming into effect of the Agreement, whether Supplier needs more time to prepare the Mixers foundation layout and drawings. In any event, the Mixers foundation layout and drawings delivery date will not be later than 90 days from the Coming into Effect Date.
|
|||
4)
|
General technical specifications and instructions of ancillary equipment and plants servicing the Plant, which are not to be supplied by
SELLER
, but have to be designed and manufactured directly by
BUYER
|
60 days
|
|
The days mentioned in points 2), 3) and 4) above shall be the calendar days calculated from the date of receipt by
SELLER
of
BUYER
's approval of each of the final layout of the Plant, as per above point 1).
|
|||
5)
|
Operation and maintenance handbooks of machines and equipment and relevant electric diagrams and spare parts
|
with the machines
|
|
6)
|
*List of suggested spare parts and prices
|
60 days from the Coming into Effect Date
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
|
c)
|
Services
|
|
(i)
|
performing and completing the Tests\Activities with respect to the Second USA Plant – will be in accordance with the following schedule:
|
|
(a)
|
Completion of Cold Test: April 30, 2015
|
|
(b)
|
Completion of Hot Start-Up: May 31, 2015
|
|
(c)
|
Plant Delivery Completion: June 30, 2015
|
6.2.
|
Delivery of technical documentation shall be executed by express courier.
|
6.3.
|
Delays.
SELLER
acknowledges that time is of the essence in the performance of this Contract and that delays shall cause
BUYER
significant damages. Without derogating from
BUYER'
s rights, it is hereby agreed that in case of delays in relation to the dates set forth in Section 6.1 above,
SELLER
shall pay
BUYER
for every complete calendar week of delay, a penalty equal to [***]% of the Contract Price (the
"Penalty"
);
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
|
(i)
|
If the results of the Performance Tests of the Second USA Plant differ from the
GUARANTEE PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
set forth in Section A of Exhibit IV and the tolerance defined thereto in section A of Exhibit IV by up to [***]% of the said
GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
(which means that together with the tolerance defined in section A to Exhibit IV it differs from the
GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
by up to [***]%)
|
|
(ii)
|
If the results of the Performance Tests of the Second USA Plant differ from the
GUARANTEE ON THE PRODUCT QUALITY FIGURES
set forth in sub sections (a), (b) and (c) of Section A1 of Exhibit IV and the tolerance defined thereto in section A1 of Exhibit IV by up to [***]% of the said
GUARANTEED
ON THE PRODUCT QUALITY FIGURES
(which means that together with the tolerance defined in section A1 to Exhibit IV it differs from the .
GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
by up to [***]%)
|
6.4.
|
In case that the Buyer does not collect the Plant from Seller within 30 days following the written notice by the Seller that the Plant (in a whole) is ready for delivery in accordance with this Contract, then Seller shall be entitled, after 7 days written notice to Buyer, to deliver the Plant to Buyer's Site, at Buyer's expense, which shall be paid as soon as Buyer receives an invoice from Supplier. In such case Buyer shall be committed to release the machines from customs in the designated port, and store them as required. Buyer shall be responsible for any demurrage of the containers which are not released in accordance with the aforementioned; All of the above mentioned, does not apply in case that the Buyer's delay in collecting the Plant is related to any of the following:(i)the Moulding Line Delivery Date had not occurred within two calendars months from the time scheduled in Section 6.1; (ii) the Finishing Line Delivery Date had not occurred within two calendars months from the time scheduled in Section 6.1 (iii) Force Majeure.
|
7.
|
SHIPPING AND PACKAGING
|
7.1.
|
Included in the Contract Price, the goods shall be delivered FCA Breton (Incoterms 2010) – transportation insurance not included
.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
7.2
|
SUPPLIER
shall inform
BUYER
in writing about each forthcoming delivery at least fifteen (15) days before the scheduled date, in order to allow
BUYER
to make the required arrangements.
|
7.3
|
In the event
of damage to or loss within delivery of the Plant or any part thereof which is not at the Supplier's responsibility,
BUYER
shall be entitled to purchase from Seller the relevant machines and equipment to replace the damaged and lost machines and equipment and
SELLER
undertakes to supply such machines and equipment accordingly with a new separate Agreement which will be negotiated between the parties in good faith and will substantially follow the conditions of this Contract.
|
8.
|
BUYER'S OBLIGATIONS AND SITE STANDARDS
|
8.1.
|
BUYER
shall be responsible for the adequacy accessibility, maintenance and safety of the
Site
for the whole period of force of this
Contract
and will make the Site and the Buyer's personnel and equipment available from the beginning of Installation and until the Plant Delivery Completion.
|
8.2
|
BUYER
shall be responsible under the applicable Laws at the Site, from the Moulding Line Delivery Date throughout the entire set-up of the Industrial Facility, for the following:
|
|
(a)
|
safety of all persons entitled to enter the
Site
in order
to avoid any danger to persons or things
for the whole period of force of this
Contract
;
|
|
(b)
|
take reasonable measures required for maintaining the
Site
and the
Industrial Facility
in proper condition for the whole period until the issuance of the Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant.
|
8.3
|
In case
BUYER
should need for all the maintenance and operating handbooks of the machines and equipment supplied by
SUPPLIER
some different language than English,
then
BUYER
shall be responsible for their translation in the new required language.
|
9.
|
INSURANCE
|
9.1
|
Supplier will obtain and maintain, as long as it has legal liability in connection with the supplied machines and/or equipment at its own expense comprehensive general liability insurance, including Product Liability and Completed Operation coverage, with a reputable insurance company, of at least [***] euros (Euro [***]) per occurrence combined single limit, and aggregate limit of [***] euros (Euro [***]). In this policy, Buyer shall be added as additional insured.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
|
Supplier will provide BUYER with a certificate of insurance evidencing such insurance. Such certificate will further contain a provision that said policy or policies cannot be cancelled, terminated, nor renewed or materially changed during the term of the insurance cover without thirty (30) days prior written notice to BUYER.
|
|
The stipulated limits of coverage above will not be construed as a limitation of any potential liability of Supplier, and failure to request evidence of this insurance will in no way be construed as a waiver of Supplier’s obligation to provide the insurance coverage specified.
|
9.2
|
The
Parties
agree that any damage/amount not covered by an insurance, or not recovered from insurers, shall be borne by
BUYER
or
SUPPLIER
in accordance with their respective responsibilities under this
Contract
or, if not specified in this Contract, under the applicable Laws.
|
9.3
|
Without derogating from any other of his liability SELLER shall be solely responsible for the safety of SELLER'S personnel at the Site and shall be liable for any bodily and property damages caused to SELLER'S personnel at the Site. Additionally, SELLER shall be liable for any bodily and property damages caused to BUYER or BUYER'S personnel by SELLER'S personnel at the Site.
|
10.
|
TESTS/ACTIVITIES
– GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
10.1
|
SUPPLIER and BUYER,
each one according with the respective responsibility defined in this Contract, shall take any reasonable step in order to effectively and timely carry out any of the Tests/Activities provided for in this
Contract
with respect to the
Plant
.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
10.2
|
All the cost for the implementation of the Test/Activity foreseen in this Contract, except for Supplier's personnel salaries, shall be borne by
BUYER
, except for
Performance Test
that shall be borne by
BUYER
only up to fourth test included.
|
10.3
|
SUPPLIER
shall give
BUYER
a two days' advance notice in writing of any Test/Activity to be carried out (the transcription of the notice in the Logbook with at least a two days' advance will have the same validity as a written communication).
|
10.4
|
The "
Logbook
" shall always record and certify any Test/Activity, as set forth in Article
3.25 hereof.
|
10.5
|
Any Test/Activity shall be carried out for the machines and equipment composing the Plant subject of this Contract and separate Certificates will be issued per each Test/Activity relevant to the machines and equipment composing the Exhibit I.
|
10.6“
|
It is hereby clarified that the execution (including the successful execution) of any Test\Activity and the issuance of any certificate in accordance with the terms herein shall not derogate from the
SUPPLIER's
liability for the proper operation of the machines and equipment as specified herein.
|
|
Except for the issuance of the Certificate which is specifically required under this Contract, no other record, including record made in the Logbook, shall be considered as such Certificate (which shall be issued in accordance with the relevant specimen Exhibit to this Contract).
|
10.7
|
All Test\Activities shall be conducted by the Supplier in accordance with the time table set forth in Section 6.1 (c) herein.
|
11.
|
COLD TESTS
|
11.1.
|
Upon completion of the installation at
Site
(including connecting of the Plant to all utilities required for its operation), each group of machines and/or equipment composing the
Plant
or, at
SUPPLIER
's discretion, the complete
Plant
, shall be subject to separate "
Cold Tests
". "
Cold Tests"
as a whole shall be carried out in view of assessing the:
|
|
a)
|
compliance of the
Plant
supplied with the
Scope of Supply
;
|
|
b)
|
effectiveness under no-load conditions of the machinery/equipment subject to "
Cold Tests
".
|
|
c)
|
Continuous and error-free operation of the software and control system
|
11.2.
|
At least two (2) working days prior to the selected date,
SUPPLIER
shall inform
BUYER
in writing (the simple annotation in the Logbook being also valid to such end) that the
Plant
, or part thereof, shall be subject to "
Cold Tests
".
BUYER
shall be entitled to attend the Tests.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
12.
|
HOT START-UP
|
12.1
|
After the issuance of the last "
Certificate of Cold Test Executed
" and in accordance with the relevant time table of Exhibit I, article 4.4, the Plant shall be operated under load conditions. At least two (2) working days prior to the selected date,
SUPPLIER
shall inform
BUYER
in writing (the simple annotation in the Logbook being also valid to such end) that the
Plant
, or part thereof, shall be subject to "
Hot Start-up
".
|
12.2
|
The "
Hot Start-up
" could be carried out for groups of machines even if "
Cold Tests
" have not been fully accomplished, provided that both
Parties
state in writing to proceed with the "
Hot Start-up
" (the simple annotation in the Logbook being also valid to such end).
|
12.3
|
The production of what is specified under
Exhibit III
("
Guaranteed Hot Start-up Test Figures)"
, using the
Plant
correctly under the
SUPPLIER
's supervision, shall constitute the "
Hot Start-up of the Plant
" successfully completed.
|
12.4
|
BUYER
shall provide at his own cost and care, in due time for the execution of "
Hot Start-up
" and in sufficient quantity and quality all such operational and managerial personnel, labour, mixtures prepared with the mixing groups provided by the
BUYER,
ancillary materials, working tools, consumption materials, utilities including, but not limited to, electricity, water, gas, compressed air and whatever is needed as per
SUPPLIER
's
reasonable written instructions and/or according to what may be required during the start-up, in view of the best and most effective accomplishment of the test at issue.
|
12.5
|
Upon successful completion of the "
Hot Start-up
" (as mentioned in Section 12.3 above), a "
Certificate of Hot Start-up Executed
" shall be issued by
SUPPLIER
and countersigned by
BUYER
within the following two (2) working days
(the specimen of which is attached hereto in
Exhibit VI
). The
Hot Start-up
and relevant results shall anyway be recorded and certified in the Logbook.
|
13.
|
PERFORMANCE TESTS AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE
|
13.1
|
"
Performance Tests
" shall be conducted on machines and equipment composing the Plant and shall be conducted in accordance with what is set forth in
Exhibit
IV
after the signing of the Certificate of Hot Start Up Executed, and performed and completed in accordance with the relevant time table set forth in Exhibit I, article 4.4. At least two (2) working days prior to the selected date,
SUPPLIER
shall inform
BUYER
in writing (the simple annotation in the Logbook being also valid to such end) that the
Plant
shall be subject to "
Performance Tests
". The aim of the "
Performance Tests
" is to show that
Plant
can achieve the "
Guaranteed Performance Test Figures
" as they are set forth in
Exhibit
IV
.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
13.2
|
"
Performance Tests
" shall be carried out by Supplier
.
I
t being however understood that
BUYER
shall actively attend the "
Performance Tests
" for the entire period of the Performance Test.
|
13.3
|
BUYER
shall provide at his own cost and care, in due time for the execution of "
Performance Tests
" and in sufficient quantity and quality all such operational, managerial, laboratory and maintenance personnel, labour
,
ancillary materials, tools for operation and maintenance, measuring instruments, equipment, apparatus, consumption materials, utilities including, but not limited to, electricity, water, gas, compressed air etc. as specified herein, or otherwise by way of written instructions from
SUPPLIER
as may be reasonably required during the test, in view of the best and most effective accomplishment of the Performance Test at issue.
|
13.4
|
Upon the successful completion of the "
Performance Tests
" (as specified in Section 13.2 above), a "
Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant
" (the specimen of which is attached hereto in Exhibit VII) shall be issued by
SUPPLIER
's Chief Engineer and countersigned by
BUYER
’s Chief Engineer within two (2) working days thereafter. The
Performance Tests
and relevant results shall anyway be recorded and certified in the Logbook.
|
14.
|
FAILURE TO MEET GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
|
14.1.
|
If, at the end of the "
Hot Start-up
" or "
Performance Tests
", the "
Guaranteed Performance Test Figures
" or the
“Guaranteed Hot Start-up Test Figures”,
respectively
,
are not met, then
SUPPLIER
and
BUYER
shall meet to analyse the reasons of such non-achievement, decide the remedial measures and agree to conduct a new series of tests.
|
|
If also the new tests prove to be unsuccessful for reasons attributable to
SUPPLIER
, the latter shall then make, at his own cost and care, such modifications/repairs to the equipment and/or replacements of materials, as they shall be necessary to achieve the "Guaranteed Hot Start-up Test Figures" or the "
Guaranteed Performance Test Figures
", as the case may be
SUPPLIER
shall be entitled to repeat at least three times the relevant test that proved to be unsuccessful due to reasons directly attributable to
SUPPLIER
. Nothing in this Section shall derogate from Supplier's obligations to comply with the time table set forth in Section 4.4 of Exhibit I.
|
14.A
|
PERFROMANCE BOND
|
|
In order to guarantee the Plant Delivery Completion, the time schedule, Penalty payable under section 6.3 to this Contract and warranty, Supplier shall submit to Buyer, before collection of the last [***]% Contract Price and as a condition thereto, a performance bond of [***]% of the Contract Price, to be issued by a first class Italian bank, at a form as per Exhibit VIII (the "
Performance Bond
"). The Performance Bond shall be effective and exercisable, in whole or in part, for [***] months from the date of its issuance. In case that the Warranty Period terminates after such [***] months, Supplier shall extend the Performance Bond accordingly, at least 30 days prior to its expiration.
|
|
The Performance Bond may be exercised in full or in part and in more than one occasion in case of Penalty payable under section 6.3 and/or breach of Seller's responsibility under the warranty (as above referred to in this Section 14A), in amounts as shall be reasonably assessed by Buyer.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
15.
|
SUPPLIER'S GENERAL WARRANTY
|
15.1.
|
SUPPLIER
warrants hereby that all machinery and equipment (included the relevant control software) included in the
Scope of Supply
shall be free from defects in workmanship and/or materials and that
Plant,
once completed, shall be fit for the purpose
for which it has been engineered under this
Contract
.
|
15.2.
|
SUPPLIER
shall take any reasonable action to repair and/or eliminate any defects in design, workmanship, working materials and operation as may arise during a period of twelve (12) months as from the date of the "
Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant”
signed by the parties.
|
15.3.
|
The
Parties
expressly agree that during the Warranty Period:
|
|
(i)
|
SUPPLIER
shall bear any cost, shipment included, related to repair/replacement of defective parts that, if replaced, shall become his property;
|
|
(ii)
|
BUYER
shall provide and bear customs duties.
|
|
(iii)
|
BUYER
shall bear all the expenses incurred for the intervention of
SUPPLIER
's technicians (round trip, board and lodging, local transfers) in accordance with the conditions stated in Exhibit I – paragraph 4.1 hereof).
|
|
(iv)
|
The Seller will send to Buyer, during the Warranty Period, in order to perform said fixing and replacement, skilled technicians not later than 5 (five) working days from the date the Buyer sends a detailed notice to the Seller notifying it of the need for fixing with a description of the problems which occurred save where the nature of the defect is such that can be repaired by the Buyer.
|
|
(v)
|
Parts will be supplied by the Seller FOB Italian port or airport.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
15.4.
|
The Seller undertakes to supply the Buyer with all the spare parts (and technical support and assistance at site or outside the Site, as shall be required) that will be needed in the future, for the operation of the Plant, for a period of at least 10 (ten) years from the Plant Delivery Completion Date (with respect to any Plant). The price for said spare parts, technical support and assistance will be determined by the Seller provided that such a price ex-factory will not be higher than the lowest price the Seller charges or will charge its other customers.
|
15.5.
|
During the Warranty Period Buyer shall notify in writing to
SUPPLIER
of any defect for which
SUPPLIER
's assistance is required, within five (5) working days after the defect has been discovered by Buyer. Should the defect claimed be such that
BUYER
knew or, with reasonable diligence, should have known of its existence, and failure to correct the defect would be likely to cause additional damage to
Plant
and
BUYER
nonetheless fails to report the claim to
SUPPLIER
within the above term, then
SUPPLIER
shall not be held responsible for the abovementioned additional damage caused to
Plant
.
|
15.6.
|
In any event a claim for defects is made by
BUYER
,
BUYER
expressly agrees to actively co-operate with
SUPPLIER
and to allow
SUPPLIER
to carry out the necessary inspections, repairs, replacements or improvements as the case may be.
|
15.7.
|
SUPPLIER
shall have no responsibility for damages or repairs under this Warranty if the damages and repair required are the direct result of the following events:
|
|
a)
|
BUYER
has modified or altered the machines, without
SUPPLIER
's prior written consent; It is hereby clarified that maintenance work and repairs made by the Buyer in accordance with Section16.10, shall not be deemed as modification and alteration of the machines for the purpose of this section.
|
|
b)
|
BUYER
has operated/maintained the machines in a negligence manner and however not in compliance with the written indications of
SUPPLIER
provided to Buyer;
|
|
c)
|
installation or start-up have been carried out without
SUPPLIER
's supervision;
|
|
d)
|
the defect claimed by
BUYER
is caused due to other machines, not supplied by the Supplier, used by Buyer at the Site in conjunction with the Plant, even according to
SUPPLIER
's specifications, unless they are wrong.
|
15.8.
|
SUPPLIER
's warranty obligations shall be suspended each time
BUYER
has not duly met his payment obligations which are not disputed between the parties.
|
15.9.
|
SUPPLIER
shall not be held liable, under any circumstance and to any extent, for events, accidents, failures, delays, defects, losses, damages due to equipment, systems, devices, labour, on
BUYER
's
Site/Plant
which have not been supplied by
SUPPLIER
, notwithstanding whether or not
SUPPLIER
may, at any time during the implementation of this Contract, accept or approve their presence or usage.
|
15.10.
|
BUYER
shall provide and bear all related costs of ordinary maintenance works and minor repairs to
Plant
and equipment, even during the
Warranty
period. For this purpose,
BUYER
shall equip his factory, since the "
Hot Start-up
", with basic equipment and instruments as well as with sufficiently qualified technical personnel.
SUPPLIER
shall exclusively supply the parts covered by the Warranty as regulated under this
Contract
. In case that Buyer does not succeed to make such minor repair with reasonable efforts, it will inform Supplier and Supplier shall be responsible to repair it in accordance with the Warranty.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
15.11.
|
Without derogating from Seller's Warranty obligations,
BUYER
shall have the right, in his own discretion, to assign to third parties the task of replacing or repairing any defective part that he cannot replace/repair through his own personnel, at
SUPPLIER
's cost, in the event that
SUPPLIER
is unable or does not want to take immediate action in order to repair defects falling within the
Warranty
provisions.
BUYER
shall always inform
SUPPLIER
in writing as to his decision to assign the above work to third parties giving notice of the cost as well.
|
15.12.
|
Any parts subject to wear and tear as well as tools and consumption materials are not covered by this
Warranty
, although supplied by
SUPPLIER
along with machinery.
|
15.13.
|
The
Warranty
hereunder shall not cover any damage, loss or defect due to (i) negligence unloading, transportation or handling of machinery carried out by
BUYER
(or his assignees, representatives, agents, employees, carriers, forwarders, etc.), or (ii) any deteriorations due to negligence storage of goods by
BUYER
, and (iii) deterioration/ageing due to extended storage of goods by
BUYER
for reasons not attributable to
SUPPLIER
.
|
16.
|
CONTRACT PRICE
|
16.1.
|
The
Contract Price
with respect to the Plant is as follow (the
"Contract Price"
):
|
|
a total of Euro
[***]
([***]).
|
|
Seller shall provide Buyer, within 14 calendar days of the Coming into Force of this Contract the breakdown of the Second USA Plant Contract Price, for each machinery group that constitute the Second USA Plant.
|
16.2.
|
SUPPLIER
shall pay all export duties, excises or taxes that may be due under Italian Laws and regulations at the time of execution hereof.
|
16.3.
|
The Contract Price shall be paid by Buyer to Supplier, in accordance to the payment terms set forth in Exhibit X, in exchange for the supply and performance of what is specified in detail within the
Scope of Supply
hereof. The Contract Price shall be the final and exclusive payment for which the Supplier shall be entitled for under this Contract for the Scope of Supply.
|
16.4.
|
The
Contract
Price
does not include any tax, interest payment or other financing charge or consultancy fee/cost due by
BUYER
to third parties, if any, under the terms of his financing arrangements, nor any import tax, excise, expenses or federal, state or local tax that
BUYER
, or a third party in the name and on behalf of
BUYER
, is required to pay under the Laws in force in the Site.
BUYER
shall bear the cost of everything specified in this Article
16.4 (which are not set for the Supplier payment under any other section in this Contract).
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
17.
|
TERMS OF PAYMENT
|
17.1.
|
Payments shall be made in
EURO
and shall be considered as accomplished upon full receipt of funds at
SUPPLIER
's bank account, free from any lien or restriction.
|
17.2.
|
The
Contract Price
shall be paid in accordance with the payment terms set forth in
Exhibit IX
.
|
18.
|
LICENSE
|
18.1.
|
The
Parties
hereby expressly acknowledge and undertake the following:
|
|
(a)
|
In addition to Section
4.1.5.3 and subject to Section
4.1.6.2
4.1.6.2 above
,
along with the supply of the
Plant
subject-matter of this Contract and for no additional payment of any kind,
SUPPLIER
hereby grants
BUYER
a license to use any registered patent and software that the Supplier may own or have right to at the time of this Contract or thereafter (if any) related to the Plant and the manufacturing of products by using the Plant (the “
License
”); Such License is non-exclusive, royalty free, irrevocable, may be used by Buyer unconditionally and may be transferred to third parties with the Plant. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, Buyer shall not directly or indirectly transfer the License to third parties, that at Buyer's reasonable knowledge are competitors of the Supplier that produce and sell machinery similar to the Plant for the production of compound stone. Supplier represents that other than the aforementioned Licence no additional license is required for the free operation of the Plant.
|
|
(b)
|
after the supply of the
Plant
that is the subject-matter of this
Contract
,
SUPPLIER
shall inform
BUYER
of, and offer him in that applicable to his plant, any technical and technological improvement and updating that may be made to the product manufacturing process.
|
18.2.
|
Each Party shall always refer fairly to the
Trade Names
of other party’s property. Each Party shall not, whether during or after this Contract represent in any way that it owns the Trade Names or is entitled to use the Trade Names otherwise than as specifically provided herein.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
19.
|
SITE WHERE PLANT OPERATES: RIGHTS / OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES
|
|
BUYER
shall set up the
Plant
that is the subject matter of this
Contract
in Georgia, United State of America.
|
20.
|
CONTRACT
ASSIGNMENT
|
|
"Affiliates"
means a corporate or an association, which Controls the Buyer, which is Controlled by the BUYER or which is under the same Controlling entity as the Buyer. The term “Control” shall mean direct or indirect ownership of more than 50% of the equity or voting capital of an entity, the ability to appoint or elect a majority of the members of the board of directors (or similar organ) of the entity or possession of the right and power to direct the policy and management of such entity.
|
21.
|
CONFIDENTIALITY
|
|
The
Parties
hereby expressly agree and acknowledge that the terms of this
Contract and
its
Exhibits
hereof are strictly confidential.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
|
In addition, SUPPLIER acknowledges that the content of this Contract and any information with respect thereto and with respect to
BUYER
and its Affiliates, and to their operation, business plan and other information, is confidential and shall be maintained by SUPPLIER in confidence and shall not be disclosed to any third party nor otherwise will be used by SUPPLIER. In addition Buyer hereby informs Supplier and Supplier acknowledges that, any such information may be considered as "material information" with respect to the BUYER's and its Affiliates' business, and therefor SUPPLIER may be subject to certain restrictions with respect to the trading in BUYER's grandparent company's shares, in accordance with the United States Securities
Exchange
Act
of 1934 and unauthorized disclosure of information related to BUYER, its grandparent company and other Affiliates, and/or to this Contract, may constitute a breach of the applicable securities laws and regulation.
|
22.
|
COMING INTO FORCE OF CONTRACT
|
|
Coming into force
: this
Contract
shall enter into force and be binding upon the
Parties
from the date of signing by
BUYER
and
SUPPLIER
.
|
23.
|
COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Any communication to be sent under this
Contract
by either
Party
to the other, shall be made in writing at the address stated on the first page hereof, by fax or mail, save otherwise agreed upon, at the only attention of the following persons: (i) for
BUYER
Mr. Giora Wagman
and Mr. Dory Yaakov
(ii) for
SUPPLIER
Mr. Giancarlo Crestani
. Either
Party
shall have the right to change its respective address and above specified persons by notice to be sent to the other
Party
.
|
24.
|
FORCE MAJEURE
|
24.1.
|
Force Majeure
events shall be considered as such only if: (i) they are not under any party's control, (ii) they occur after signing of the
Contract,
(iii) if they prevent the
Contract
from being implemented totally or partially, and (iv) there is no possibility for the party who is prevented from preforming its obligations due to such event, to overcome the effect of such event and perform its obligations nevertheless (
"Force Majeure"
).
|
24.2.
|
If either
Party
is prevented from or delayed in performing any of its obligations under the
Contract
due to
Force Majeure
, then the
Party
being so affected shall notify timely and officially the other, by registered mail return receipt requested, of the circumstances constituting
Force Majeure
with adequate evidence of the obligation or performance which is thereby delayed or prevented. The
Party
giving notice shall thereupon be excused with respect to the performance or punctual execution thereof for the duration of the circumstances constituting
Force Majeure.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
24.3.
|
In case
Force Majeure
conditions last continuously for more than one (1)
month as from the date of the official notice pursuant to Article
24.2, the
Parties
shall meet to agree on the necessary arrangements to be taken. It is understood that each
Party
shall have fulfilled its contractual obligations as far as they have become due before the occurrence of the
Force Majeure
event.
|
25.
|
CONTROVERSIES BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND APPLICABLE LAW
|
26.
|
LIST OF EXHIBITS TO THE CONTRACT
|
|
This
Contract
includes the following
Exhibits
, which form an integral and un-severable part hereof:
|
|
All terms not specifically defined in a certain exhibit shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Contract or in another Exhibit thereto.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
6.
|
Exhibit VI
|
Specimen of the Certificate of Hot Start-up Executed
|
7.
|
Exhibit VII
|
Specimen of the Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant
|
8.
|
Exhibit VIII
|
Specimen of the Performance Bond
|
9.
|
Exhibit
I
X
|
Terms of payment
|
10.
|
Exhibit
X
|
Form of Bank Guarantee
|
27.
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
27.1
|
Intentionally omitted.
|
|
27.2
|
Intentionally omitted.
|
|
27.3
|
Modifications or additions to this
Contract
shall be binding upon the
Parties
only upon approval in writing by the respective legal representatives, with specific reference being made to this article and to that part of the
Contract
or
Exhibit
subject to modification / addition.
|
|
27.4
|
The
Parties
shall actively co-operate in order to obtain permits, approvals, export and import licenses, etc. required for the implementation of this
Contract
. It is however agreed that
each Party
shall be solely responsible for obtaining all local permits and licenses necessary for the execution and implementation of this Contract in his Country, for which he shall bear all related expenses.
|
|
27.5
|
This
Contract
has been freely discussed, negotiated and drawn up in Sdot-Yam (Israel). N° 3 originals have been duly signed, of which n° 1 for
SUPPLIER
and n° 2 for
BUYER
.
|
|
27.6
|
Should one or more provisions of this
Contract
be partly of wholly invalidated or declared ineffective, any other provisions shall remain fully valid and effective.
|
28.
|
INSPECTION
|
28.1
|
Prior to shipping of the goods,
SUPPLIER
shall allow
BUYER
, at his own expenses, to inspect the machines ("
Buyer Inspections
"), at
SUPPLIER
's premises; the inspection shall verify only that the supply is as per the Contract in term of quantity and specification (as listed in Exhibit I of this Contract).
SUPPLIER
shall send Notice of Goods Ready only after
BUYER
shall confirm that the machine had successfully passed
BUYER
Inspections or in absence of such confirmation or a written notice that the delivery is not confirmed, if within 7 calendar days from the written notice that the machine are ready for the above inspection BUYER’s experts have not yet executed the inspection or have not yet send the written report about the executed inspection. It is explicitly agreed that BUYER Inspections do not derogate from SUPPLIER exclusive liability to the condition of the Plant, its appropriate operation and full performance of its undertakings under this Contract.
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
|
SELLER's
Chief Technician shall visit the Site immediately after the
BUYER
notifies the
SELLER
that the Site is ready for the provision of the equipment and machines, in order to verify that the Site is so ready for the Plant Installation. The above mentioned Buyer’s notification that the Site is ready – with respect to Bar Lev shall be sent to Supplier not later than one calendar month in advance of the Machinery and Equipment Delivery Date as per Exhibit I, article 4.4
|
_____________________________________
|
_____________________________________
|
BUYER
|
SUPPLIER
|
_____________________________________
|
Giancarlo Crestani (Director)
|
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
|
BRETON S.P.A.
|
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italy)
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
|
1.
|
|
The Second USA Plant Contract Price will be paid by the Buyer as follows:
|
|
(i)
|
[***] % of the Second USA Plant Contract Price will be paid as down payment, against Buyer's receipt from Supplier of an invoice and a bank guarantee by a first class Italian bank of the same amount
for the reimbursement of the said payment ("
Bar Lev Advance Payment
");
|
|
(ii)
|
[***] % of the Second USA Plant Contract Price will be paid through an irrevocable Letter of Credit, which shall be issued by Buyer's Israeli bank (Bank Mizrachi or Bank Leumi) , within [***] calendar days from the Coming into Force date of this Contract, against issue of the Performance Bond, and will be payable as follows:
|
|
a.
|
[***] % of the Second USA Plant Contract Price will be payable [***] ([***]) days from the date of the Forwarder Certificate of Receipt, against the documents specified in Section 2(a) herein;
|
|
b.
|
[***] % of the Second USA Plant Contract Price will be payable [***] ([***]) days from the date of the Forwarder Certificate of Receipt if a Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant is issued by the Buyer by such time (upon presenting the documents specified in Section 5(a) herein and the Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant), and, if a Final Acceptance Certificate of the Plant was not made by such time – payable within [***] days (upon presenting the documents specified in Section 2(a) herein).;
|
Cont'd:
|
Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc..
|
|
2.
|
General
|
a.
|
The documents to be presented to the bank in order to receive payment under the L\C are the following:
|
|
o
|
commercial invoices: one original and two copies;
|
|
o
|
Packing List: one original and two copies;
|
|
o
|
Forwarder Certificate of Receipt (to the designated destination): one original;
|
|
o
|
Certificate of origin issued by the Italian Chamber of Commerce: one original and two copies.
|
|
o
|
AND FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE LAST INSTALLEMENT EQUAL TO [***]% OF THE CONTRACT PRICE - Performance Bond at an amount equal to [***]% of the Contract Price, at a form per the specimen attached in Exhibit VIII.
|
|
b.
|
Letter of Credit which shall be issued in accordance with this Contract shall
be issued and regulated under the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits issued by the International Chamber of Commerce, Publication n. 600, last revision.
|
|
c.
|
In case of partial shipments, payment will be made under the LC after the Forwarder Certificate of Receipt for the final shipment and in accordance with section 5(a) above.
|
|
d.
|
The L/C shall be available by payment, at the scheduled payment dates, at the counters of the nominated bank.
|
|
e.
|
The L/C foresees may be confirmed by an Italian bank at Supplier’s decision and cost.
|
|
f.
|
Supplier shall bear all costs related to all bank guarantees which will be issued by Supplier to guarantee any down payment amount under this Contract.
|
|
g.
|
The bank guarantees issued by the Supplier to secure the aforementioned down payments, will be in accordance with the specimen in Exhibit X.
|
_____________________________________
BUYER
|
_____________________________________
SUPPLIER
|
_____________________________________
|
Giancarlo Crestani (Director)
|
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
|
BRETON S.P.A.
|
EXHIBIT I
to Contract
IS-110/14
dated June 5, 2014
between
BRETON SpA
and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS AND PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF THE PLANT
&
DESCRIPTION OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES COMPOSING THE SUPPLY
|
1)
|
Functional Specifications And Production Capacity Of The Plant
|
2)
|
List of Machines, Equipment, Consumption Materials and Spare-parts if included in the Supply
|
3)
|
List of Technical Documentation
|
4)
|
List of Services
|
Bretonstone
®
Slab Plant
|
1)
|
FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS AND PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF THE
PLANT
|
1.1)
|
FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PLANT
|
|
a)
|
THE PRODUCT AND ITS MAJOR COMPONENTS
|
|
¨
|
The
P
lant subject-matter of this Contract is designed for the manufacture of compound stone slabs
made by bonding together sands and grits of a simple natural quartz using unsaturated polyester resins dissolved in styrene.
|
|
¨
|
[***].
|
|
¨
|
As everybody knows, inert grits consist of small fragments of natural stone materials as well as of natural and artificial lithoid materials. The maximum diameter of the grits does not exceed [***] mm.
One can indifferently use sands and grits of quartz, quartzite, diorite, granite and any other siliceous material as well as sands and grits of marble and of any calcareous material.
|
|
¨
|
Natural lithoid sands and grits can be obtained from shells, mother-of-pearl, madrepore and suchlike, while artificial lithoid materials include glass and ceramic grits, fragments of mirrors, etc.
|
|
¨
|
The most commonly used and widely diffused structural resin is [***] according to the most suitable formulations.
|
|
¨
|
The basic Plant, like the one supplied hereof, works normally under environmental temperatures ranging between [***]°C and [***]°C; any other environmental temperature is possible by equipping the plant with suitable machines and auxiliary plants.
|
|
b)
|
THE SLAB DIMENSIONS
|
Bretonstone
®
Slab Plant
|
|
c)
|
THE SLAB THICKNESS
|
1.2)
|
PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF THE PLANT
|
|
a)
|
The manufacturing process is performed following a regular cadence which is fixed by the time the [***] requires to [***] the slabs (for the sake of brevity, said time is defined “cycle time”).
|
|
|
b)
|
In plants equipped with just [***] group for the [***], the production could normally be arranged in [***] working shifts per day, seven days a week.
|
|
c)
|
The plant utilization schemes specified in above point b) set forth the plant production capacity.
|
Bretonstone
®
Slab Plant
|
2)
|
LIST OF MACHINES, EQUIPMENT, CONSUMPTION MATERIALS AND/OR SPARE-PARTS IF INCLUDED IN THE SUPPLY
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
Pos.
|
A.
|
11)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
A.
|
12)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
A.
|
13)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
A.
|
14)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
A.
|
15)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
A.
|
16)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
A.
|
17)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
A.
|
18)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
Pos.
|
1A.
|
3)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
1A.
|
4)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
1/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
2)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
2/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
2/2)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
3)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
4)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
4/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
5)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
6)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
6/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
B.
|
7)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
Pos.
|
C.
|
1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
C.
|
2)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
C.
|
2/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
C.
|
3)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
C.
|
4)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
C.
|
5)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
Pos.
|
D.
|
18)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
D.
|
19)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
2)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
3)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
4)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
4/1)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
5)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
6)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
7)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
8)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
9)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
10)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
11)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
12) | n. [***] [***] | |
Pos.
|
E.
|
13)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E
|
14)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
15)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
16)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
17)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
18)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
19)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
|
Pos.
|
E.
|
20)
|
n. [***] [***]
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
II)
|
Protection barriers
|
q
|
The machines composing the Groups "B" - "C" –“D” and "E" must be bounded with protection barriers, in conformity with the regulations in force in the Country where the plant has to be installed.
|
r
|
Breton
machines comply with the "Essential safety and health requirements as for the design and construction of machines and safety components" provided by the
98/37/CE Directives
.
|
|
Ø
|
metallic barriers, fixed to the ground, 140 or 200 cm in height;
|
|
Ø
|
photoelectric barriers with safety photoelectric cells;
|
|
Ø
|
access doors with key switches to stop the machines.
|
|
-
|
EMC directive
89/336 CEE
and its following amendment;
|
|
-
|
LVE directive
73/23 CEE
and its following amendment;
|
|
-
|
Directive
ATEX 94/9 CE
.
|
|
-
|
UL-Csa
norms following Georgia electrical requirement for the electrical components and boards.
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
3)
|
LIST OF TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION
|
|
·
|
General layout of the plant;
|
|
·
|
Layout of the electrical, water and pneumatic feeding points, with specifications of the water and electric requirements;
|
|
·
|
Layout of foundations and standard working drawings of foundations, drawn up according to the [***] rules, dimensioned for a [***].
|
|
·
|
Operation and maintenance handbooks of machines and equipment and relevant electric diagrams, which shall include
operating and maintenance instructions with respect to the electric and mechanic aspects of the Plant, and any part of the Plant and spare parts lists.
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
4)
|
LIST OF SERVICES
|
|
§
|
Installation and
Cold Tests
of
Plant
,
by
SUPPLIER
's
skilled technicians;
|
|
§
|
Hot Start-up
and
Performance Tests
of Plant, by
SUPPLIER
's skilled technicians;
|
|
§
|
Training to
BUYER
's personnel in charge with production, by the
SUPPLIER
's skilled technicians.
|
4.1)
|
INSTALLATION AND COLD TESTS OF PLANT
|
|
1)
|
Seller
, through his own technical personnel, will be responsible for the Installation and Cold Tests of the machines and equipment composing the Plant.
|
|
2)
|
Work sequence
|
|
a)
|
[***]
|
|
b)
|
[***]
|
|
c)
|
[***]
|
|
d)
|
[***]
|
|
3)
|
Time required
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
|
4)
|
Additional expenses/services to be provided and paid by
Buyer
|
|
4.a)
|
[***]
|
|
4.b)
|
[***]
|
|
4.c)
|
[***]
|
|
4.d)
|
[***]
|
|
4.
e
)
|
[***]
|
|
4.f)
|
[***]
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
|
4.g)
|
Technical supervision
|
4.2)
|
HOT START-UP AND PERFORMANCE TESTS OF PLANT
|
|
1)
|
Seller
, through his own technical personnel, will manage and operate the Hot Start-up and Performance Tests of the machines and equipment composing the Plant.
|
|
2)
|
Work sequence
|
|
a)
|
[***]
|
|
b)
|
[***]
|
|
c)
|
[***]
|
|
3)
|
Time required
|
|
4)
|
Additional expenses/services to be borne and paid by
Buyer
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit “I” to the Contract n° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
4.3)
|
TRAINING TO BUYER'S PERSONNEL IN CHARGE WITH PRODUCTION, BY SUPPLIER'S SKILLED TECHNICIANS
|
|
1)
|
During the period of Hot Start-up and Performance Tests,
Seller
's technicians will carry out the practical training to
Buyer
's operational staff in charge with the Plant running relating to the operating and safety methods, cleaning and maintenance of the machines and equipment composing the Plant.
|
|
2)
|
For this purpose,
Buyer
will make available to
Seller
's technicians for the entire period of training, a minimum number of workers sufficient to carry out the normal operating, cleaning and maintenance of the machines and equipment composing the Plant.
|
|
3)
|
SELLER
shall conduct and maintain records in the Log Book of each training session, which shall include the content of each training session, its duration, the identity of the participants, the Seller's personnel who attended the training session.
SELLER
shall
record in the Log Book at the end of each Working Day about the aforementioned information.
|
|
4)
|
If, for any reason not due to
Seller
, the time required for the above training will last longer than foreseen,
Buyer
shall pay the amount [***].
|
4.4
|
Schedules for delivery, installation and performance and completion of any Test\Activity
|
BUYER
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC
|
SUPPLIER
BRETON S.P.A.
|
EXHIBIT
II
to Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014
between
BRETON SpA
and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
SPECIMEN OF THE LOGBOOK
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "II" to the Contract nr. IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
|
In questo Libro Giornale sono registrati i lavori svolti presso il Sito……….. dal personale del Fornitore e dal personale del Compratore in suo ausilio, a partire dal giorno …., fino al giorno…
Questo Libro Giornale è un documento ufficiale contrattuale, le sue pagine sono numerate progressivamente da pag. 1 a pag. .., e va conservato secondo le regole stabilite nel Contratto
In this Logbook are registered the jobs performed in the Site………. by
Seller
’s personnel with the support of
Buyer
's personnel, from … to ……
This Logbook is an official contractual document; its pages are numbered from page 1 to page …, and must be kept according to the rules foreseen in the Contract
|
Firma del
Capo Tecnico del Compratore
|
Signature of
BUYER
's Chief Engineer
|
BRETON SPA
|
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "II" to the Contract nr. IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
|
________________________________________
|
________________________________________
|
BUYER
|
SUPPLIER
|
________________________________________
|
Giancarlo Crestani (Director)
|
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
|
BRETON S.P.A.
|
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italia)
|
EXHIBIT III
to Contract N° IS-110/12 dated June 5, 2014
between
BRETON SpA
and
CAESARSTONE
TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC
.
METHOD OF EXECUTION OF THE HOT START-UP OF THE PLANT
|
A)
|
TYPOLOGY OF THE MANUFACTURED BRETONSTONE PRODUCT
|
|
a)
|
Slabs with unfinished dimensions of approx.
[***]
x
[***]
cm and finished thickness
[***]
(
[***]
) cm, composed of aggregates with max. size
[***]
mm and
[***]
;
|
|
b)
|
Slabs with unfinished dimensions of approx.
[***]
x
[***]
cm and finished thickness
[***]
(
[***]
) cm, composed of aggregates with max. size
[***]
mm and
[***]
;
|
|
c)
|
Slabs with unfinished dimensions of approx.
[***]
x
[***]
cm and finished thickness
[***]
(
[***]
) cm, composed of aggregates with max. size
[***]
mm and
[***]
.
|
B)
|
TIME REQUIRED FOR HOT START-UP
|
________________________________________
|
________________________________________
|
BUYER
|
SUPPLIER
|
________________________________________
|
Luca Toncelli (President)
|
BRETON S.P.A.
|
|
Caesarstone Technologies USA, Inc.
|
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italia)
|
EXHIBIT IV
to Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014
between
BRETON SpA
and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
AND METHOD OF EXECUTION OF PERFORMANCE TESTS
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "IV" to the Contract Nr. IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
|
|
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.
|
A)
|
GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE TEST FIGURES
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "IV" to the Contract Nr. IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.
|
|
A1)
|
GUARANTEE ON THE PRODUCT QUALITY FIGURES
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "IV" to the Contract Nr. IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.
|
|
Reference Table
|
CHARACTERISTICS OF BRETONSTONE
®
(DATA REFERRED TO SOME SAMPLES)
|
||||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
||
Aggregate nature
|
Quartz
|
Montorfano
Granite
|
Quartz
|
Quartz
|
Montorfano
Granite
|
standards employed for
testing
|
Aggregates max
. dimension (mm)
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
|
Type of binder
|
[***]
|
|||||
Specific weight (kg/dm
3
)
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Flexural strength (N/mm
2
)
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Water absorption (% by weight)
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Impact test (Joule)*
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Deep Abrasion Resistance (mm
3
)
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Freezing- thawing resistance (KM
f25
)
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Acids chemical resistance
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Thermal Shock:
Flexural. Strength. (ΔR %)
Mass loosing (ΔM %)
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Linear thermal expansion
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "IV" to the Contract Nr. IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.
|
|
|
-
|
[***]
|
|
-
|
[***]
|
|
-
|
[***]
|
|
-
|
[***]
|
|
-
|
[***]
|
B)
|
METHOD OF EXECUTION OF PERFORMANCE TEST
|
|
a)
|
[***]
|
|
b)
|
[***]
|
|
c)
|
[***]
|
|
d)
|
[***]
|
|
e)
|
[***]
|
|
g)
|
[***]
|
B)
|
CONSUMPTION MATERIALS AND TOOLS
|
Cont'd:
|
Exhibit "IV" to the Contract Nr. IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.
|
|
_______________________________________
|
_______________________________________
|
BUYER
|
SUPPLIER
|
_______________________________________
|
Luca Toncelli (President)
|
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC .
|
BRETON S.P.A.
|
EXHIBIT V
to Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014
between
BRETON SpA
and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
SPECIMEN OF THE CERTIFICATE OF COLD TEST EXECUTED
|
BUYER
's Chief Engineer
|
SUPPLIER
's Chief Engineer
|
In the name and on behalf of
BUYER
|
In the name and on behalf of
SUPPLIER
|
Signed on the 5
th
day of June, 2014
|
|
_________________________________
|
_________________________________
|
BUYER
|
SUPPLIER
|
_________________________________
|
Giancarlo Crestani (Director)
|
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC. | BRETON S.P.A. |
EXHIBIT VI
to Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014
between
BRETON SpA
and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
SPECIMEN OF THE CERTIFICATE OF HOT START-UP EXECUTED
|
BUYER
's Chief Engineer
|
SUPPLIER
's Chief Engineer
|
In the name and on behalf of
BUYER
|
In the name and on behalf of
SUPPLIER
|
On the 5th day of June, 2014
|
|
_________________________________
|
_________________________________
|
BUYER
|
SUPPLIER
|
_________________________________
|
Giancarlo Crestani (Director)
|
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC. | BRETON S.P.A. |
EXHIBIT VII
to Contract N° IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014
between
BRETON SpA
and
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
SPECIMEN OF THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE OF PLANT
|
BUYER
's Chief Engineer
|
SUPPLIER
's Chief Engineer
|
In the name and on behalf of
BUYER
|
In the name and on behalf of
SUPPLIER
|
On the 5th day of June, 2014
|
|
_________________________________
|
_________________________________
|
BUYER
|
SUPPLIER
|
_________________________________
|
Giancarlo Crestani (Director)
|
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC. | BRETON S.P.A. |
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italia) |
EXHIBIT VIII to
Contract
N° IS-110/14
dated June 5, 2014
between BRETON and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
SPECIMEN OF PERFORMANCE BOND GUARANTEE
|
-
|
On June 5, 2014 a Contract for the supply of BRETONSTONE SLAB PLANTS and ADDITIONAL MACHINES, EQUIPMENT and SERVICES was signed between you and Breton S.p.A. - Via Garibaldi 27 - 31030 Castello di Godego (TV) Italy;
|
-
|
as per above Contract, Breton S.p.A. is obligated to issue in your favor a “Performance Bond Guarantee” for the amount of Euro [***] (……………../00) [[***]% OF THE CONTRACT PRICE]
(
hereinafter: the “
Principal Amount of the Guarantee
”).
|
_________________________________
|
_________________________________
|
BUYER
|
SUPPLIER
|
|
Giancarlo Crestani (Director)
|
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC. | BRETON S.P.A. |
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italia) |
EXHIBIT X to Contract
N° IS-110/14
dated June 5, 2014
between BRETON and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
SPECIMEN OF THE GUARANTEE FOR THE REIMBURSEMENT
OF THE PAYMENT IN ADVANCE
|
-
|
On June 5th, 2014 a Contract nr. IS-110/14 for the supply of BRETONSTONE SLAB PLANTS and ADDITIONAL MACHINES, EQUIPMENT and SERVICES was signed between you and Breton S.p.A. - Via Garibaldi 27 - 31030 Castello di Godego (TV) Italy;
|
-
|
As per above Contract, Breton S.p.A. is obligated to issue in your favor a “Bank Guarantee” for the amount of Euro [***] (……………../00) [[***]% OF THE CONTRACT PRICE]
(
hereinafter: the “
Principal Amount of the Guarantee
”)
|
Cont’d:
|
EXHIBIT X
to the Contract Nr.
IS-110/14 dated June 5, 2014 between BRETON SpA and CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, Inc.
|
_________________________________
|
_________________________________
|
BUYER
|
SUPPLIER
|
|
Giancarlo Crestani (Director)
|
CAESARSTONE TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC. | BRETON S.P.A. |
Castello di Godego, Treviso (Italia) |
Product
|
Quantity 2015
|
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
Name
|
Jurisdiction of Incorporation/Organization
|
|
Caesarstone Australia PTY Limited
|
|
Australia
|
Caesarstone South East Asia PTE LTD
|
|
Singapore
|
Caesarstone Canada Inc.
|
|
Canada
|
Caesarstone USA, Inc.
|
|
United States
|
Caesarstone Technologies USA, Inc. | United States |
/s/ Yosef Shiran
|
|
Yosef Shiran
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
/s/ Yair Averbuch
|
|
Yair Averbuch
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
In connection with the Annual Report of Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yosef Shiran, and I, Yair Averbuch, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
/s/ Yosef Shiran
|
|
Yosef Shiran
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 12, 2015
|
/s/ Yair Averbuch
|
|
Yair Averbuch
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date: March 12, 2015
|
/s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
|
KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
|
A Member of Ernst & Young Global
|
Haifa, Israel
|
March 12, 2015
|
/s/Grant Thornton Australia Ltd
|
Grant Thornton Australia Ltd
|
Melbourne, Australia
|
March 11, 2015
|
FREEDONIA CUSTOM RESEARCH, INC.
|
|||
By:
|
/s/
Freedonia Custom Research, Inc.
|
||
Andrew Fauver
President
|
|||
March 9, 2015
|