With copies to:
|
Boaz Noiman, Adv.
Sharon Rosen, Adv. FISCHER (FBC & Co.)
146 Menachem Begin Street Tel Aviv 6492103, Israel
Telephone: +972-3-694-4111
|
|
Andris Vizbaras, Esq.
Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP
2 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
Telephone: (212) 238-8698 |
CALCULATION OF FILING FEE
|
Transaction Valuation*
$11,906,147
|
|
Amount of Filing Fee**
$1,104
|
|
*
|
|
For purposes of calculating the filing fee only, this amount is based on the offer to purchase 941,942 ordinary shares of Optibase Ltd. at a purchase price of
$12.64 cash per share.
|
|
**
|
|
The amount of the filing fee was calculated in accordance with Rule 0-11 of the Exchange Act and Fee Rate Advisory # 1 for Fiscal Year 2022 issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, by multiplying the
transaction valuation by 0.00009270.
|
|
☒ |
Check the box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing with which the offsetting fee was
previously paid. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
Amount Previously Paid: $1,104
Form or Registration No.: SC TO-T
|
Filing Party:
The Capri Family Foundation Shlomo (Tom) Wyler
Date Filed:
February 15, 2022
February 18, 2022
|
☐ |
Check the box if the filing relates solely to preliminary communications made before the commencement of a tender offer.
|
Check the appropriate boxes below to designate any transaction to which the statement relates:
|
☒
|
|
third-party tender offer subject to Rule 14d-1
|
☐
|
|
issuer tender offer subject to Rule 13e-4
|
☒
|
|
going-private transaction subject to Rule 13e-3
|
☐
|
|
amendment to Schedule 13D under Rule 13d-2
|
• |
On June 29, 2021, the last full trading day before we first announced our intention to make an offer for all of the outstanding Optibase Shares not owned by the bidder group, the last reported closing price per Optibase Share
reported on Nasdaq was $11.00 and on the TASE was NIS 35.78.
|
• |
On February 14, 2022, the last full trading day before we commenced the offer, the last price per Optibase Share reported on Nasdaq was $11.75 and on the TASE was NIS 41.00. The Offer Price, $12.64 per Optibase Share, is
approximately 7.6% greater than such last reported price on Nasdaq and approximately 0.6% greater than such last reported price on the TASE.
|
• |
During the six months prior to commencement of the offer, the average closing price of the Optibase Shares reported on Nasdaq was $11.10 and on the TASE was NIS 37.07. The Offer Price, $12.64 per Optibase Share, is approximately
13.9% greater than such six-month average price on Nasdaq and approximately 11.2% greater than such six-month average price on the TASE.
|
• |
Each member of our bidder group believes that the offer, and the Offer Price to be received by holders of Optibase Shares who are unaffiliated with Optibase pursuant to the offer, are fair to such holders.
|
• |
The Offer Price represents a premium of approximately:
|
o |
14.9% to the closing price of the Optibase Shares on Nasdaq on June 29, 2021, the last trading day prior to the date that we first announced our intention to make an offer for all of the outstanding Optibase Shares not owned by the
bidder group;
|
o |
7.6% to the closing price of the Optibase Shares on Nasdaq on February 14, 2022, the last trading day prior to commencement of our offer; and
|
o |
13.9% to the average closing price of the Optibase Shares on Nasdaq during the six months prior to commencement of the offer.
|
• |
MNS Consulting, the financial advisor to Capri, delivered to us a fairness opinion as to the fairness of the Offer Price to be received by holders of Optibase Shares who are unaffiliated with Optibase.
|
• |
In our first tender offer to acquire all of the Optibase Shares, not already owned by the bidder group, which we commenced on December 1, 2021 at an offer price of $11.20 per share, holders tendered 689,926 Optibase Shares, which was
the majority of the Optibase Shares that were not already held by our bidder group. The minimum condition of our first offer was not satisfied and all tendered shares were returned. Nevertheless, by tendering in the first offer, the
majority of the unaffiliated holders indicated that $11.20 was a fair price for their Optibase Shares. We are making this offer at a price of $12.64, or approximately 12.9% greater than in our first offer.
|
• |
Our offer has procedural features that help ensure fairness to holders of Optibase Shares who are not affiliated with Optibase.
|
• |
The Offer Price represents a premium of approximately:
|
o |
14.9% to the closing price of the Optibase Shares on Nasdaq on June 29, 2021, the last trading day prior to the date that we first announced our intention to make an offer for all of the outstanding Optibase Shares not owned by the
bidder group;
|
o |
7.6% to the closing price of the Optibase Shares on Nasdaq on February 14, 2022, the last trading day prior to commencement of our offer; and
|
o |
13.9% to the average closing price of the Optibase Shares on Nasdaq during the six months prior to commencement of the offer.
|
• |
MNS Consulting, the financial advisor to Capri, delivered to us a fairness opinion as to the fairness of the Offer Price to be received by holders of Optibase Shares who are unaffiliated with Optibase.
|
• |
In our first tender offer to acquire all of the Optibase Shares, not already owned by the bidder group, which we commenced on December 1, 2021 at an offer price of $11.20 per share, holders tendered 689,926 Optibase Shares, which was
the majority of the Optibase Shares that were not already held by our bidder group. The minimum condition of our first offer was not satisfied and all tendered shares were returned. Nevertheless, by tendering in the first offer, the
majority of the unaffiliated holders indicated that $11.20 was a fair price for their Optibase Shares. We are making this offer at a price of $12.64, or approximately 12.9% greater than in our first offer.
|
4. |
Evaluations and Financial Analysis of Capri’s Financial Advisor.
|
• |
MNS Consulting considered the financial statements and reports of Optibase as of September 30, 2021, which Optibase filed
with the SEC on November 30, 2021 on Form 6-K.
|
• |
Optibase furnished to MNS Consulting updated Property Valuations for its CTN property and its Rümlang property.
|
• |
Optibase recently has sold additional units comprising its Miami property, and the prices of those recent sales imply that the fair value of the property recently has increased.
|
• |
MNS Consulting conducted the conference calls with Mr. Philips and Mr. Ben-Naim of Optibase, disclosed in “Section 1
– Background of the Offer; Contacts with Optibase,” for the purpose of better understanding the updated Property Valuations, the recent sales of Miami units, recent developments regarding properties, discussed below, in which
Optibase is a minority holder, the general and administrative expenses of Optibase and the publicly available information concerning Optibase.
|
• |
Optibase owns 51% of an office building complex in the outskirts of Geneva, Switzerland known as Centre des Technologies Nouvelles, or CTN complex. The CTN complex includes approximately 34,800 square meters of leasable space and,
as of December 31, 2020, it was 92% occupied and generating $12.4 million of annualized rent.
|
• |
Optibase is the sole owner of a commercial building in Rümlang, Switzerland, approximately 15 kilometers from Zurich. The Rümlang property has 12,500 square meters of rentable space with office, laboratory and retail uses and, as
of December 31, 2020, it was 88% occupied and generating $2.0 million of annualized rent.
|
• |
Optibase is the sole owner of 22 residential condominium units in Miami, Florida (net of two units which Optibase recently sold). As of December 31, 2020, the Miami units were 54% occupied and generating $0.6 million of annualized
rent.
|
• |
Optibase owns 30% of a commercial building in Chicago, Illinois. MNS Consulting estimated the fair value of this stake by applying a discount rate of 6% to 2020 net operating income. The resulting asset value of the property was
significantly less than liabilities on the property. MNS Consulting therefore estimated the net value of the property as zero.
|
• |
Optibase owns a 22% stake in Two Penn Center Plaza, a commercial building in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The principal lender on the property, Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2021-C59, included a valuation for this property
in a free writing prospectus that it filed with the SEC on April 14, 2021 (Registration file number 333-226486-19). Based on this valuation, MNS Consulting estimated that the net value of Optibase’s holding in the property is
approximately $14.1 million.
|
• |
Optibase owns a 4% stake in Texas Shopping Centers, a portfolio of shopping centers in and around Houston, Dallas, and San Antonio, Texas. Optibase furnished to MNS Consulting the financial statements of Texas Shopping Centers,
which state the fair value of the portfolio, of which $5.7 million is attributed to Optibase.
|
NO.
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
¶
|
English translation from Hebrew.
|
Expert Opinion in the matter of:
|
The Capri Family Foundation
Fair offer price to the unaffiliated holders of
Optibase Ltd.
|
1. |
We (MSN Consulting Ltd.) have been asked by The Capri Family Foundation (the “Client”) to provide an opinion on the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated holders of the outstanding ordinary shares (the “Shares” or
“OBAS Shares”) of Optibase Ltd. (the “Company”) of the Offer Price to be received by such holders in the Tender Offer (as those terms are defined below)(the “Fairness Opinion”). The Tender Offer is for all of the Shares not held by the
Client or members of its bidder group (the “Tender Offer”), pursuant to which the Client will pay, in cash, $12.64 per Share (the “Offer Price”).
|
2. |
We were asked to present our opinion solely regarding financial aspects of the Tender Offer. Our economic assessment intends to reflect in a fair and reasonable manner a given situation, based on known data and in respect to the basic
assumptions.
|
3. |
The date of initial contact between the Client and ourselves was June 30, 2021.
|
4. |
We conducted an evaluation on November 30, 2020 (the “Initial Evaluation”) in relation to the Client’s first tender offer for OBAS Shares, which it commenced on December 1, 2020.
|
5. |
In connection with the Client’s current Tender Offer, which it commenced on February 15, 2022, we updated the evaluation (the “Updated Evaluation”).
|
6. |
The Updated Evaluation was presented to the Client on February 14, 2022 and relies on Optibase’s financial statements as of September 31, 2021.
|
7. |
This document includes a specification of the methodology which was used in the Updated Evaluation. However, the specification does not include the complete details of the procedures which we implemented in its structuring.
|
8. |
The methodology used in the preparation of the Updated Evaluation is similar to that which was used in the preparation of the Initial Evaluation. In the framework of the Updated Evaluation, we determined the fair value of the Company
using a net asset value methodology and by adjusting the values of items on the Company's balance sheet to their fair values. Among other things, we used appraisals, recent sale prices of assets, or discounted cash flow methodology in
relation to the value of the Company's assets and regarding the fair value of the Company’s loans.
|
9. |
The Updated Evaluation incorporates the latest information from the following sources:
|
• |
The Company’s latest financial reports and statements as of September 30, 2021
|
• |
Two third-party appraisals published of the assets in Chemin des Aulx, Switzerland, and Rümlang, Switzerland
|
• |
Actual sale prices of units in the asset in Miami, Florida
|
• |
Conversations with the management of the Company
|
• |
Historical data regarding market prices
|
• |
Public reports on the Company from the ‘TASE’
|
• |
Public information and data including the general background of the Company along with its sectors of activity
|
• |
This Fairness Opinion is directed to the Client in connection with the Tender Offer and is not a recommendation to, and does not substitute independent judgment to be carried out by, any holder of Shares regarding the Tender Offer.
Without derogating from the above, this Fairness Opinion shall not be quoted or used for any other purpose without the prior written consent of MNS Consulting Ltd. (“MNS”), except that this Fairness Opinion may be reproduced in full in, and
reference to this Fairness Opinion, and to MNS and its relationship to the Client, may be included in, any tender offer materials or other materials relating to the Tender Offer that the Client files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission or otherwise as required by law.
|
• |
In composition of this Updated Evaluation, we have relied on the sources listed above. We have relied on additional sources that, according to our personal long-term experience, we consider reliable. However, we have not independently
investigated such sources and information, and therefore do not express our opinion regarding the authenticity, completeness, and/or the accuracy of the aforementioned data. Furthermore, we have not reviewed the aforementioned additional
sources’ data and thus cannot speak to the authenticity, integrity, and/or accuracy of the data.
|
• |
An economic evaluation should reasonably reflect a given situation at a specific time, based on known data. It should be noted that the Updated Evaluation relies on forward-looking assumptions and, as such, has no certainty regarding
their realization. The information upon which we have relied may change or be affected by various factors which cannot be foreseen or controlled. The information on which we have relied on may differ substantially, in various manners, in
light of any additional material, information, and/or event that shall or may be obtained or in light of events that shall or may occur after the preparation of the Updated Evaluation.
|
• |
This Fairness Opinion does not constitute a due diligence report and does not pretend in any form or manner to include any information, examinations, and conclusions provided by a due diligence report.
|
• |
It should be emphasized that this Fairness Opinion does not constitute as legal advice or a legal opinion, nor as advice regarding investments in the Company's securities. Additionally, this Fairness Opinion does not take into
consideration taxation aspects of the potential transactions.
|
• |
MNS, its shareholders, senior management, and officers hereby declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the Fairness Opinion. They have no personal connections to the Company, its shareholders, its board of directors and
officers and any of the Company’s subsidiaries, nor have previously been employed by or hold any securities associated with any of the aforementioned.
|
• |
The remunerations received for the Fairness Opinion have been pre-determined between the Client and MNS and are not dependent on the results and/or recommendations provided in the Fairness Opinion.
|
• |
MNS shall bear no liability for any damages or financial loss that may occur to any person or company due to any flaw in the information on which we have relied, or arising from any failure to furnish us with other information that may
be relevant to our Updated Evaluation. In addition, and without derogating from the generality of the above, our limitation of liability for damages of any kind, other than damage caused due to our action in gross negligence and/or malice,
is limited to up to three times the remunerations paid by the Client for this Fairness Opinion (the “Cap of Liability”). MNS shall not pay any compensation in excess of the Cap of Liability. The Client shall indemnify and/or reimburse MNS
in any event in which MNS shall be required to pay an amount in excess of the Cap of Liability. In addition, the Client is obligated to indemnify MNS for reasonable expenses that will be incurred or be required to be paid for legal
representation, legal advice, professional advice, defense against legal proceedings, negotiations, etc. The aforementioned indemnification obligation shall not apply if MNS acted, with respect to the services provided in the preparation of
this document, in malice or in gross negligence.
|