Item
1.
Condensed Financial Statements
AERO
GROW INTERNATIONAL, INC.
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Derived from Audited Statements)
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,228,769
|
|
|
$
|
501,577
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
28,079
|
|
|
|
42,756
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $188 and $768 at June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, respectively
|
|
|
61,677
|
|
|
|
221,713
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
139,596
|
|
|
|
197,076
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,668,998
|
|
|
|
1,784,424
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
253,343
|
|
|
|
309,340
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
3,380,462
|
|
|
|
3,056,886
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,739,734 and $2,709,075 at June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, respectively
|
|
|
109,058
|
|
|
|
133,768
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net of $124,765 and $120,923 of accumulated
amortization at June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, respectively
|
|
|
200,963
|
|
|
|
198,490
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
145,201
|
|
|
|
145,744
|
|
Deferred debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization
of $2,260,601 and $1,449,581 at June 30, 2012 and March 31,
2012, respectively
|
|
|
33,096
|
|
|
|
844,116
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
379,260
|
|
|
|
1,188,350
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,868,780
|
|
|
$
|
4,379,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
$
|
256,918
|
|
|
$
|
633,995
|
|
Notes payable – related party
|
|
|
102,846
|
|
|
|
307,821
|
|
Current portion – long term debt – related party
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
100,464
|
|
Current portion – long term debt
|
|
|
588,612
|
|
|
|
988,589
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
476,012
|
|
|
|
607,840
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
340,933
|
|
|
|
252,562
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
6,232
|
|
|
|
8,270
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
6,739
|
|
|
|
6,207
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,778,292
|
|
|
|
2,905,748
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
1,861,005
|
|
|
|
5,892,590
|
|
Long term debt – related party
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
702,708
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,639,297
|
|
|
|
9,501,046
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized,
0 and 7,526 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012
and March 31, 2012, respectively
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value, 750,000,000 shares authorized,
576,294,744 and 20,994,160 shares issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, respectively
|
|
|
576,295
|
|
|
|
20,994
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
74,566,573
|
|
|
|
62,602,533
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(74,913,385
|
)
|
|
|
(67,745,577
|
)
|
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
|
|
229,483
|
|
|
|
(5,122,042
|
)
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
|
$
|
3,868,780
|
|
|
$
|
4,379,004
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed financial statements.
AEROGROW INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS
OF
OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Product sales, net
|
|
$
|
1,416,533
|
|
|
$
|
1,479,903
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
693,332
|
|
|
|
850,832
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
723,201
|
|
|
|
629,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
93,024
|
|
|
|
22,063
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
451,177
|
|
|
|
514,000
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
577,616
|
|
|
|
714,319
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
1,121,817
|
|
|
$
|
1,250,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) from operations
|
|
|
(398,616
|
)
|
|
|
(621,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (income)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
108,975
|
|
|
|
830,656
|
|
Interest expense – related party
|
|
|
11,650
|
|
|
|
118,341
|
|
Debt conversion costs
|
|
|
6,648,267
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
(27,321
|
)
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
|
6,769,192
|
|
|
|
921,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(7,167,808
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,542,975
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding , basic and diluted
|
|
|
576,294,744
|
|
|
|
19,244,160
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed financial statements.
AEROGROW INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS
OF
CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
$
|
(7,167,808
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,542,975
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to cash (used) provided by operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock and options under equity compensation plans
|
|
|
63,384
|
|
|
|
67,473
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
35,579
|
|
|
|
95,526
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
(590
|
)
|
|
|
(1,495
|
)
|
Debt conversion costs associated with inducement
|
|
|
3,461,637
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
811,020
|
|
|
|
178,890
|
|
Amortization of convertible debentures, beneficial conversion feature
|
|
|
1,066,804
|
|
|
|
253,838
|
|
Amortization of convertible debentures, beneficial conversion
feature – related party
|
|
|
188,924
|
|
|
|
47,591
|
|
Interest expense from warrants issued with convertible debentures
|
|
|
954,687
|
|
|
|
217,219
|
|
Interest expense from warrants issued with convertible
debentures – related party
|
|
|
186,881
|
|
|
|
43,311
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
|
160,626
|
|
|
|
198,866
|
|
Decrease in other receivable
|
|
|
57,480
|
|
|
|
84,794
|
|
(Increase) decrease in inventory
|
|
|
(22,973
|
)
|
|
|
80,529
|
|
Decrease in other current assets
|
|
|
55,997
|
|
|
|
155,695
|
|
Decrease in deposits
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable
|
|
|
(131,828
|
)
|
|
|
70,486
|
|
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses
|
|
|
116,457
|
|
|
|
(70,031
|
)
|
Increase in accrued interest
|
|
|
54,443
|
|
|
|
109,802
|
|
Increase in accrued interest-related party
|
|
|
11,650
|
|
|
|
27,439
|
|
Decrease in customer deposits
|
|
|
(2,038
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
Increase (decrease) in deferred rent
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
(6,754
|
)
|
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
(98,593
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,705
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
14,677
|
|
|
|
127,954
|
|
Purchases of equipment
|
|
|
(7,027
|
)
|
|
|
(4,181
|
)
|
Patent expenses
|
|
|
(6,315
|
)
|
|
|
(3,645
|
)
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
$
|
1,335
|
|
|
$
|
120,128
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of notes payable
|
|
|
(185,782
|
)
|
|
|
(230,881
|
)
|
Repayments of notes payable – related party
|
|
|
(85,002
|
)
|
|
|
(98,949
|
)
|
Proceeds from long term borrowings
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Repayments of long term debt borrowings
|
|
|
(85,662
|
)
|
|
|
(74,904
|
)
|
Repayments of long term debt borrowings – related party
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise and issuance of warrants
|
|
|
1,180,896
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities
|
|
$
|
824,450
|
|
|
$
|
(404,734
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
727,192
|
|
|
|
(273,901
|
)
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
501,577
|
|
|
|
355,781
|
|
Cash, end of period
|
|
$
|
1,228,769
|
|
|
$
|
81,880
|
|
See supplemental disclosures below and the accompanying notes to the condensed financial statements.
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
39,997
|
|
|
$
|
28,997
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease of debt associated with inventory consumption
|
|
$
|
138,399
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Conversion of accrued expenses to common stock
|
|
$
|
28,086
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Conversion of Note Payable to common stock
|
|
$
|
211,690
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Conversion of Note Payable -related party to common stock
|
|
$
|
129,258
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Conversion of convertible note to common stock
|
|
$
|
5,717,882
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Conversion of convertible note accrued interest to common stock
|
|
$
|
545,157
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Conversion of convertible note-related party to common stock
|
|
$
|
1,078,513
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Conversion of convertible note-related party accrued interest to common stock
|
|
$
|
102,828
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Modification of accrued interest to short term debt
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
8,415
|
|
Modification of related party accrued interest to short term debt - related party
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
5,928
|
|
AEROGROW INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1.
|
Description of the Business
|
AeroGrow International, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 25, 2002. We are in the business of developing, marketing, and distributing advanced indoor aeroponic and hydroponic garden systems. After several years of initial research and product development, we began sales activities in March 2006. Since that time we have expanded all aspects of our operations in order to take advantage of what we believe to be an attractive market opportunity. We currently offer four different indoor garden models, with each model available in different colors and trim styles, more than 40 seed kits, and various gardening and kitchen accessories. Although our business is focused on the United States and Canada, our products are available in nine other countries.
During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 (“Fiscal 2010”), March 31, 2011 (“Fiscal 2011”), and March 31, 2012 (“Fiscal 2012”) we scaled back our operations as a result of the general economic downturn and the resulting decline in consumer spending. We also determined that broad distribution through large retailers was not appropriate for a company at our stage of development because of relatively low profit margins, high capital requirements, and the operational requirements of our retailer customers.
As a consequence, beginning in late Fiscal 2010 and continuing through Fiscal 2012, we re-focused our efforts towards building our direct-to-consumer business, which carries higher margin opportunity. To position our business for the future, we increased the depth and breadth of our direct sales distribution channels to include a direct mail catalogue business with approximately 900,000 catalogues mailed in Fiscal 2012, significantly increased our web-selling presence and developed a robust e-mail marketing program. In addition, we have tested print ads in national magazines, infomercials, mall kiosks, and long-form and short-form infomercials, and may increase our use of these marketing vehicles in the future. In Fiscal 2012, approximately 89.8% of our total sales were to direct customers and, approximately 94.0% of total sales were to direct customers in the first three months of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2013 (“Fiscal 2013”).
To further our strategic shift towards direct-to-consumer selling, we began investigating the network marketing channel of distribution during Fiscal 2011. Network marketing, which is also known as direct selling or multi-level marketing, involves person-to-person selling through independent distributors, which may represent a potential next step in our stated strategy to move the marketing and selling of AeroGrow products closer to the end consumer. In April 2011, we entered into a Licensing Agreement with Cyrano Partners, LLC (“Cyrano”) under which Cyrano began to offer our products in the network marketing sales channel. Simultaneously we entered into a Transaction Agreement with Cyrano to form a joint venture to pursue the network marketing sales channel, subject to the achievement of certain conditions precedent, including an obligation on the part of Cyrano to raise the capital necessary to fund the joint venture. Cyrano was unable to satisfy the funding condition precedent and, in August 2011, the Licensing Agreement and the Transaction Agreement were terminated. We believe that network marketing may represent a viable sales channel for our products, and are continuing to investigate potential strategies for entering this channel of distribution.
2.
|
Liquidity, Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, and Basis of Presentation
|
Interim Financial Information
The unaudited interim financial statements of the Company included herein have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim reporting including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. These condensed statements do not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for annual audited financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the SEC on June 26, 2012.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company at June 30, 2012, the results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the cash flows for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the expected results of operations for the full year or any future period. The balance sheet as of March 31, 2012 is derived from the Company’s audited financial statements.
The Company has incurred net losses since its inception, including a net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2012 of $7,167,808 that included the impact of $6,648,267 in one-time, non-cash accounting charges related to the conversion of the Company’s convertible debt into common equity during the quarter.
Sources of funding to meet prospective cash requirements include the Company’s existing cash balances, cash flow from operations, and borrowings under the Company’s debt arrangements.
During Fiscal 2010 we began the process of restructuring our balance sheet and began efforts to re-capitalize the Company to address cash and liquidity constraints that were severe, at times, and had a material impact on the operations of the business. During Fiscal 2010 we issued approximately $6.7 million of convertible preferred stock, restructured the amounts and payment timing of certain of our accounts payable, and reduced the amount of interest-bearing debt outstanding. During Fiscal 2011, we issued $7.0 million in Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes and $1.5 million in short-term working capital debt (see additional detail under the caption “Liquidity and Capital Resources”). In Fiscal 2012, we restructured the amounts and payment timing of certain of our accounts payable, issued $1.6 million in short-term working capital debt, restructured the payment schedule for a $2.1 million note payable to a supplier, and received approval from our stockholders and affected creditors to convert our Series A Preferred Stock and Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes into common stock (see additional detail on these transactions in Part II – Other Information, Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds). The conversions of our convertible securities were completed on April 11, 2012. In addition, during May 2012, we offered our warrant holders the opportunity to exercise their warrants at a reduced price, resulting in $1.59 million of new common equity capital from warrant exercises.
As a result of these efforts, we believe we can meet our cash requirements for the next twelve months. We do intend to seek additional capital, however, to provide a cash reserve against contingencies, address the seasonal nature of our working capital needs, and to enable us to invest further in trying to increase the scale of our business. There can be no assurance we will be able to raise this additional capital, that we will be able to increase the scale of our business, or that our existing resources will be sufficient to meet all of our cash requirements. In such an event, we would reduce the scale of our operations and take such actions as are available to us to reduce our cash requirements. However, there can be no assurance that such actions would be successful.
Prospectively, the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company being able to generate sufficient cash flows to meet its obligations on a timely basis, to obtain additional capital as may be required, and ultimately to attain profitable operations. The Company’s liquidity projections are predicated on a variety of assumptions including, but not limited to the timing and seasonality of working capital needs, revenue and expenses, cash flow from operations, access to sufficient funding, the levels of customer and consumer demand, the impact of cost reduction programs, and the state of the general economic environment in which the Company operates. In the event these assumptions prove to be inaccurate, there could be material adverse changes to the Company’s liquidity position.
Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. It is reasonably possible that a change in the Company’s estimates will occur in the near term.
Net Income (Loss) per Share of Common Stock
The Company computes net income (loss) per share of common stock in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260. ASC 260 requires companies with complex capital structures to present basic and diluted Earnings per Share (“EPS”). Basic EPS is measured as the income or loss available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is similar to basic EPS but presents the dilutive effect on a per share basis of potential common stock (e.g., convertible securities, options, and warrants) as if they had been converted at the beginning of the periods presented. Potential shares of common stock that have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e., those that increase income per share or decrease loss per share) are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS. All potentially dilutive securities outstanding have been excluded for the periods presented since their effect would be antidilutive.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
Concentrations of Risk
ASC 825-10-50-20
requires disclosure of significant concentrations of credit risk regardless of the degree of such risk. Financial instruments with significant credit risk include cash. The amount on deposit with a financial institution is fully guaranteed under the Transaction Account Guarantee program.
Customers:
For the three months ended June 30, 2012, and June 30, 2011, the Company had no customers that represented more than 5% of the Company’s net product sales.
Suppliers:
For the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company purchased inventories and other inventory-related items from two suppliers totaling $187,338 and $58,426 representing 27.0% and 8.4% of cost of revenue, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company purchased inventories and other inventory-related items from two suppliers totaling $173,558 and $165,345 representing 10.2% and 9.8% of cost of sales, respectively.
The Company’s primary contract manufacturers are located in China. As a result, the Company may be subject to political, currency, regulatory and weather/natural disaster risks. Although the Company believes alternate sources of manufacturing could be obtained, these risks could have an adverse impact on operations.
Accounts Receivable:
As of June 30, 2012, the Company had one customer, Canadian Tire Corporation, which represented 36.7% of the $61,677 in outstanding accounts receivable. As of March 31, 2012, this customer represented 62.8% of the $221,713 in outstanding accounts receivables. Management believes that all receivables from this customer are collectible.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company follows the guidance in ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(“ASC 820”), as it relates to the fair value of its financial assets and liabilities. ASC 820 provides for a standard definition of fair value to be used in new and existing pronouncements. This guidance requires disclosure of fair value information about certain financial instruments (insurance contracts, real estate, goodwill and taxes are excluded) for which it is practicable to estimate such values, whether or not these instruments are included in the balance sheet at fair value. The fair values presented for certain financial instruments are estimates which, in many cases, may differ significantly from the amounts that could be realized upon immediate liquidation.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability, i.e., exit price, in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC 820 also provides a hierarchy for determining fair value, which emphasizes the use of observable market data whenever available. The three broad levels defined by the hierarchy are as follows, with the highest priority given to Level 1 as these are the most reliable, and the lowest priority given to Level 3.
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data, including model-derived valuations.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity.
The carrying value of financial instruments including cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximates their fair value at June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012 due to the relatively short-term nature of these instruments. As of June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, the fair value of the Company's debt using Level 3 inputs was estimated using the discounted cash flow method, which is based on the future expected cash flows, discounted to their present values, using a discount rate of 18%.
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carry Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carry Value
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
$
|
346,551
|
|
|
$
|
359,764
|
|
|
$
|
875,488
|
|
|
$
|
941,816
|
|
Notes payable discount
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,796,184
|
|
|
|
2,449,617
|
|
|
|
7,984,860
|
|
|
|
10,081,647
|
|
Long-term debt discount
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,397,296
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,142,735
|
|
|
$
|
2,809,381
|
|
|
$
|
8,860,348
|
|
|
$
|
8,626,167
|
|
As of June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, the Company did not have any financial assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis subsequent to initial recognition.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company sells its products to retailers and consumers. Consumer transactions are primarily paid by credit card. Retailer sales terms vary by customer, but generally range from net 30 days to net 90 days. Accounts receivable are reported at net realizable value and net of the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company uses the allowance method to account for uncollectible accounts receivable. The Company's allowance estimate is based on a review of the current status of trade accounts receivable, which resulted in an allowance of $188 and $768 at June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, respectively.
Other Receivables
In conjunction with the Company’s processing of credit card transactions for its direct-to-consumer sales activities and as security with respect to the Company’s performance for credit card refunds and charge backs, the Company is required to maintain a cash reserve with Litle and Company, the Company’s credit card processor. This reserve is equal to 5% of the credit card sales processed during the previous six months. As of June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, the balance in this reserve account was $139,596 and $197,076, respectively.
Advertising and Production Costs
The Company expenses all production costs related to advertising, including print, television, and radio advertisements when the advertisement has been broadcast or otherwise distributed. The Company records media costs related to its direct-to-consumer advertisements, inclusive of postage and printing costs incurred in conjunction with mailings of direct-response catalogues, and related direct-response advertising costs, in accordance with ASC 340-20-
Reporting on Advertising Costs
. As prescribed by ASC 340-20-25, direct response advertising costs incurred are reported as assets and are amortized over the estimated period of the benefits, based on the proportion of current period revenue from the advertisement to probable future revenue. As of June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, the Company deferred $192 and $2,524, respectively, related to such media and advertising costs. Advertising expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 were $170,457 and $138,611, respectively.
Inventory
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost, determined by the first-in, first-out method, or market. Included in inventory costs where the Company is the manufacturer are raw materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead. The Company records the raw materials at delivered cost. Standard labor and manufacturing overhead costs are applied to the finished goods based on normal production capacity as prescribed under ASC 330
Inventory Pricing
. A majority of the Company’s products are manufactured overseas and are recorded at cost.
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
918,425
|
|
|
$
|
913,627
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
750,573
|
|
|
|
871,157
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,668,998
|
|
|
$
|
1,784,424
|
|
The Company determines an inventory obsolescence reserve based on management’s historical experience and establishes reserves against inventory according to the age of the product. As of June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, the Company had reserved $103,401 for inventory obsolescence.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue from product sales, net of estimated returns, when persuasive evidence of a sale exists: that is, a product is shipped under an agreement with a customer; risk of loss and title has passed to the customer; the fee is fixed or determinable; and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
The Company records estimated reductions to revenue for customer and distributor programs and incentive offerings, including promotions, rebates, and other volume-based incentives. Certain incentive programs require the Company to estimate based on industry experience the number of customers who will actually redeem the incentive. At June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, the Company had accrued $23,137 and $37,955, respectively, as its estimate for the foregoing deductions and allowances.
Warranty and Return Reserves
The Company records warranty liabilities at the time of sale for the estimated costs that may be incurred under its basic warranty program. The specific warranty terms and conditions vary depending upon the product sold but generally include technical support, repair parts, and labor for periods up to one year. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include the number of installed units currently under warranty, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims on those units, and cost per claim to satisfy the Company’s warranty obligation. Based upon the foregoing, the Company has recorded as of June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, a provision for potential future warranty costs of $6,734 and $8,304, respectively.
The Company reserves for known and potential returns from customers and associated refunds or credits related to such returns based upon historical experience. In certain cases, retailer customers are provided a fixed allowance, usually in the 1% to 2% range, to cover returned goods and this allowance is deducted from payments made to us by such customers. As of June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, the Company has recorded a reserve for customer returns of $16,154 and $27,258, respectively.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASC Update 2011-04 (Topic 820)
Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS
. This ASC update results in a consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The new guidance includes changes to how and when the valuation premise of highest and best use applies, clarification on the application of blockage factors and other premiums and discounts, as well as new and revised disclosure requirements. This ASC update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
In September 2011, the FASB issued updated guidance on the periodic testing of goodwill for impairment. This guidance will allow companies to assess qualitative factors to determine if it is more-likely-than-not that goodwill might be impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test required under current accounting standards. This new guidance is effective July 1, 2012, with early adoption permitted. This new guidance will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
3.
|
Notes Payable, Long Term Debt and Current Portion – Long Term Debt
|
As of June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, the outstanding balance of the Company’s note payable and debt, including accrued interest, is as follows:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Main Power Promissory Note
|
|
$
|
1,857,897
|
|
|
$
|
1,999,297
|
|
First Western Trust Term Loan
|
|
|
516,183
|
|
|
|
578,445
|
|
Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,032,188
|
|
Notes Payable –Credit Card Receipts-Backed Notes
|
|
|
359,765
|
|
|
|
941,815
|
|
Pawnee Promissory Note
|
|
|
75,536
|
|
|
|
74,422
|
|
Total Debt
|
|
|
2,809,381
|
|
|
|
8,626,167
|
|
Less Notes Payable and Current Portion – Long Term Debt
|
|
|
948,376
|
|
|
|
2,030,869
|
|
Long Term Debt
|
|
$
|
1,861,005
|
|
|
$
|
6,595,298
|
|
Main Power Promissory Note
On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement (“Letter Agreement”) with Main Power Electrical Factory, Ltd. (“Main Power”) and executed a Promissory Note. Pursuant to the terms of the Letter Agreement, Main Power agreed to release the Company from $1,386,041 of existing obligations owed by the Company to Main Power in return for the execution of the Promissory Note for the same amount. In addition, the Letter Agreement included other provisions relating to the terms and conditions under which AeroGrow purchases AeroGarden products from Main Power. The original Promissory Note had a final maturity of June 30, 2011, carried an interest rate of 8% per annum and called for principal payments of $150,000 monthly beginning January 31, 2011, with a final payment of all principal and accrued but unpaid interest due on June 30, 2011.
Effective as of December 31, 2010, AeroGrow and Main Power entered into an agreement to amend various obligations owed by AeroGrow to Main Power. As part of the amendments, AeroGrow issued a new promissory note (the “Revised Main Power Note”) in the amount of $2,162,046. The Revised Main Power Note retired and replaced the original Promissory Note, and also retired and replaced certain obligations totaling $661,446 relating to raw material and finished goods inventory purchased and/or manufactured by Main Power on behalf of AeroGrow. The Revised Main Power Note had a final maturity of May 31, 2013, and carried an interest rate of 8% per annum.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, AeroGrow fell behind on the scheduled payments due under the Revised Main Power Note because of its cash constraints and reached an informal arrangement with Main Power to defer payments while a restructuring of the note was negotiated. Subsequently, the parties executed an amendment to the Revised Main Power Note that, effective as of December 31, 2011, restructured the amortization schedule for the Revised Main Power Note and extended the final maturity to December 15, 2015. In addition, Main Power agreed to waive any existing defaults under the Revised Main Power Note. The agreed revisions to the amortization schedule provide for monthly interest payments through the final maturity and principal payments totaling $3,000 during the fourth fiscal quarter of Fiscal 2012, $159,000 during Fiscal 2013, $555,000 during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2014, $725,000 during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015, and $664,724 during the period April 2015 through December 2015. In addition, any utilization by AeroGrow of consignment inventory held as collateral by Main Power further reduces the amount outstanding under the Revised Main Power Note. As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance under the Revised Main Power Note, including accrued interest, totaled $1,857,897 and we were current and in compliance with all terms and conditions.
First Western Trust Term Loan
On May 21, 2010, the Company, First Western Trust Bank (“FWTB”) and Jack J. Walker, our Chairman, as guarantor, executed a business loan agreement and related promissory note (the “FWTB Term Loan”) for a four-year loan in an initial principal amount of $1 million. The FWTB Term Loan is secured by a lien on our assets. The FWTB Term Loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.25% per annum. We make equal monthly payments of principal/interest over the four-year term of the FWTB Term Loan, which has a final maturity date of May 21, 2014. The terms and conditions of the FWTB Term Loan include limitations on the Company incurring additional debt and paying dividends on our stock without the consent of FWTB. In the event of a default under the FWTB Term Loan, FWTB has the option to declare the loan immediately due and payable. As of June 30, 2012, $516,183 was outstanding under the FWTB Term Loan, including accrued interest and we were current and in compliance with all terms and conditions.
Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes
Between May and September 2010, the Company completed a private offering of $7,020,000 in Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes (the “Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes”) and warrants to purchase 70,200,000 shares of our common stock (the “Warrants”). We used the proceeds from the private offering to invest in advertising and marketing programs to support our direct-to-consumer business, provide general working capital, pay commissions and expenses related to the private offering, and repay certain outstanding obligations. The issuance was conducted in reliance upon exemptions from registration requirements under the Securities Act, including, without limitation, those under Rule 506 of Regulation D (as promulgated under the Securities Act). The Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes were offered and sold only to investors who were “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act.
The Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes carried an interest rate of 8% per year, payable quarterly in cash, additional Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes, or in registered common stock of the Company, at the option of the Company, and had a maturity of May 6, 2013. When issued, the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes could be converted into shares of our common stock at any time, initially at a conversion price of $0.10 per share (the “Conversion Price”). The Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes were secured by a subordinated lien on all assets of the Company.
Each Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of our common stock at a price of $0.20 per share, and contains customary anti-dilution rights (for stock splits, stock dividends and sales of substantially all our assets) and piggyback registration rights. The Warrants expire May 6, 2015.
In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company recorded a $6,980,400 debt discount on the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes because the combined value of the Warrants and the beneficial conversion feature (which was based on the excess of the market price of our shares on the date of issuance over the Conversion Price of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes) exceeded the amount of Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes issued. The amortization of the $6,980,400 debt discount has been reported as additional interest expense and increases in long-term debt since the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes were issued.
Amortization of the debt discount on the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes amounted to $2,397,296 and $543,457 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, respectively, including the accelerated amortization caused by the conversion of all of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes and accrued interest into common stock on April 11, 2012, as discussed below. As of June 30, 2012, there was no unamortized discount on the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes remaining.
We paid $534,263 in placement agent fees and related expenses in connection with the issuance of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes. This amount was recognized as deferred debt issuance costs on our balance sheet. These costs were amortized to expense over the life of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes. In addition, we granted warrants to purchase our common stock to the placement agent for the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes (the “Placement Agent Warrants”). We granted 7,020,000 Placement Agent Warrants with an exercise price of $0.10 per common share and 7,020,000 Placement Agent Warrants with an exercise price of $0.20 per common share. The Placement Agent Warrants had a five-year term expiring May 6, 2015 and contained a cashless exercise provision. The value of the Placement Agent Warrants was recognized as $1,518,600 in deferred debt issuance cost on our balance sheet, which was being amortized to expense over the life of the Subordinated Convertible Notes. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, the amortized deferred debt issuance costs relating to the Subordinated Convertible Notes totaled $789,335 and $155,490, respectively, including the accelerated amortization caused by the conversion of all of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes and accrued interest into common stock on April 11, 2012, as discussed below.
As of October 31, 2010 and January 31, 2011, the Company issued a total of $369,385 new Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes to pay accrued interest (the “Interest Notes”). The Interest Notes had the same terms and conditions as the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes.
Effective on April 29, 2011, a majority in interest of the holders of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes agreed to modify the terms of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes to (i) waive our obligations to make quarterly interest payments and (ii) provide that interest be paid in cash only. These modifications were effective from April 29, 2011 through January 31, 2012.
On April 11, 2012, Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes totaling $7,444,380, inclusive of accrued interest of $647,985, were converted into 297,775,249 shares of the Company’s common stock, reflecting a conversion price of $0.025 per share of common stock. Subsequent to the conversions, there were no remaining Notes or accrued interest outstanding. The Note holders agreed to convert the Notes into common stock in exchange for the Company’s agreement to reduce the conversion price from $0.10 per share of common stock to $0.025 per share of common stock. As a result of the conversion of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes into common equity, the Company recognized a total of $6,648,267 in non-cash expense comprising $3,461,637 of debt conversion costs on the exchange and $3,186,630 on the accelerated recognition of the debt discount and deferred debt issuance costs during the quarter ended June 30, 2012.
As of June 30, 2012, there were no Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes or accrued interest outstanding.
Notes Payable – 2010 Credit Card Receipts-Backed Notes
On October 28, 2010 and November 5, 2010, the Company closed on the private sale of $1.5 million in 15% secured convertible promissory notes, including $450,000 in 15% related party secured convertible promissory notes, backed by a portion of our prospective credit card receipts, (the “2010 Credit Card Notes”) and 5,000,000 warrants to purchase our common stock (the “Credit Card Warrants”) (collectively, the “2010 Credit Card Offering”). Consideration for the 2010 Credit Card Offering comprised $1.5 million in cash. Net cash proceeds to the Company after deducting a 2% sales commission (1% on company-referred investors) paid to GVC Capital LLC, our placement agent, totaled $1,474,500. In addition, the Company paid a 3% deferred sales commission (2% on company-referred investors) to the placement agent concurrently with the repayment of principal of the 2010 Credit Card Notes.
We used the proceeds from the 2010 Credit Card Offering to invest in advertising and marketing programs to support our direct-to-consumer business, provide general working capital, pay commissions and expenses related to the private offering, and repay certain outstanding obligations. The issuance of the 2010 Credit Card Offering was conducted in reliance upon exemptions from registration requirements under the Securities, including, without limitation, those under Rule 506 of Regulation D (as promulgated under the Securities Act). The 2010 Credit Card Offering was offered and sold to six (6) investors who are “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act.
The 2010 Credit Card Notes carried interest at 15% per annum, had an initial maturity of July 28, 2011, and could be converted at any time into common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $0.18 per share. Twenty percent of our daily credit card receipts were held in escrow with First Western Trust Bank under an Escrow and Account Control Agreement to fund bi-weekly payments of principal and interest to the investors in the 2010 Credit Card Offering.
Each Credit Card Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of our common stock at a price of $0.20 per share, and contains customary anti-dilution rights (for stock splits, stock dividends and sales of substantially all our assets) and piggyback registration rights. The Warrants expire October 28, 2015.
Our obligation to repay certain of the 2010 Credit Card Notes was severally guaranteed by Jack J. Walker, our Chairman (up to $500,000), J. Michael Wolfe, Chief Executive Officer (up to $200,000) and H. MacGregor Clarke, Chief Financial Officer (up to $100,000).
In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company recorded a $90,000 debt discount on the 2010 Credit Card Offering. The amortization of the $90,000 debt discount was reported as additional interest expense and increases in notes payable over the estimated payoff period of the 2010 Credit Card Notes.
We incurred $80,659 in paid and deferred placement agent fees and related expenses in connection with the issuance of the 2010 Credit Card Notes. This amount was recognized as deferred debt issuance costs on our balance sheet. These costs were amortized to interest expense over the estimated payoff period of the 2010 Credit Card Notes. In addition, for nominal consideration, the Company sold a total of 1,333,333 warrants to purchase our common stock to the placement agent (the “Placement Agent Warrants”). Placement Agent Warrants of 833,333 were issued and had an exercise price of $0.18 per share of common stock. Of the Placement Agent Warrants, 500,000 have an exercise price of $0.20 per share of common stock. The Placement Agent Warrants had a five-year term and contained a cashless exercise provision. The value of the Placement Agent Warrants was recognized as $30,000 in deferred debt issuance cost on our balance sheet, which was amortized to interest expense over the estimated payoff period of the 2010 Credit Card Notes.
For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, the total amortized deferred debt issuance costs relating to the 2010 Credit Card Offering were zero and $23,401, respectively.
Effective as of July 28, 2011, a majority in interest of the holders of the 2010 Credit Card Notes agreed to extend the maturity of the 2010 Credit Card Notes to October 31, 2011. As of October 3, 2011, the 2010 Credit Card Notes were repaid in full.
Notes Payable – 2011 Credit Card Receipts-Backed Notes
During the three months ended December 31, 2011, we closed on the private sale of $1,633,776 in 17% secured promissory notes backed by a portion of our prospective credit card receipts, (the “2011 Credit Card Notes”) and a 1% share of our prospective monthly sales into the network marketing channel for a period of three years following our first sale into the network marketing channel (the “MLM Revenue Share”) (collectively, the “2011 Credit Card Offering”). Consideration for the 2011 Credit Card Offering comprised $1,477,300 in cash and the conversion of $156,476 in other obligations of the Company, including $61,476 of deferred compensation owed to executive officers of the Company. After deducting $46,565 of placement agent sales commissions (5% on third-party investors, 3% on Company-referred investors and 0% on investments by officers and directors of the Company) and expenses, net cash proceeds to the Company totaled $1,430,735. In addition, the Company is obligated to pay a deferred sales commission to the placement agent equal to 10% of the MLM Revenue Share paid to investors in the 2011 Credit Card Offering (with the deferred sales commission reduced to 6% for payments to Company-referred investors and 0% on payments to officers and directors), concurrently with the payment of the MLM Revenue Share.
We used the proceeds from the 2011 Credit Card Offering to invest in advertising and marketing programs to support our direct-to-consumer business, purchase inventory, provide other general working capital, and pay commissions and expenses related to the private offering The issuance of the 2011 Credit Card Offering was conducted in reliance upon exemptions from registration requirements under the Securities Act, including, without limitation, those under Rule 506 of Regulation D (as promulgated under the Securities Act). The 2011 Credit Card Offering was offered and sold only to investors who are, or the Company reasonably believed to be, “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act. Because the 2011 Credit Card Offering has not been registered under the Securities Act, the securities sold in the 2011 Credit Card Offering are “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act, and investors will not be able to sell the securities in the United States absent an effective registration statement or an applicable exemption from registration.
The 2011 Credit Card Notes bear interest at 17% per annum and have a final maturity of October 1, 2012. 20% of our daily credit card receipts will be held in escrow with First Western Trust Bank under an Escrow and Account Control Agreement to fund bi-weekly payments of principal and interest to the investors in the Credit Card Offering.
The obligation of the Company to repay the Credit Card Notes is severally guaranteed by Jack J. Walker, our Chairman (up to $510,555), J. Michael Wolfe, our Chief Executive Officer (up to $204,222) and H. MacGregor Clarke, our Chief Financial Officer (up to $102,111).
During May 2012, $340,948 in 2011 Credit Card Notes (including accrued interest) were converted to common equity pursuant to the exercise of common stock warrants. For additional information on these transactions, please see Part II – Other Information, Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance of the 2011 Credit Card Notes reported as a liability on our balance sheet, including accrued interest, totaled $359,765 and we were current and in compliance with all terms and conditions.
Pawnee Promissory Note
On November 30, 2011, the Company executed a promissory note (the “Lease Promissory Note”) in the principal amount of $116,401 in favor of Pawnee Properties, LLC (“Pawnee”). The Lease Promissory Note details the terms and conditions pursuant to which the Company will pay to Pawnee past due rent and building operating expenses related to our headquarters lease. The Lease Promissory Note carries an interest rate of 6% per annum for the first twelve months, and 8% per annum thereafter. Payments of principal and interest are due on the first day of each month during the periods: (i) December 2011 through April 2012 (aggregate payments for the period of $45,000); (ii) November 2012 through April 2013 (aggregate payments for the period of $45,000); and (iii) November 2013 through March 2014 (aggregate payments for the period of $36,064, which amount will be reduced by $4,500 in the event that all payments due during the term of the Lease Promissory Note are made on a timely basis). The Lease Promissory Note can be prepaid at any time, at the option of the Company, without penalty. In the event of a default in payment, the interest rate would be increased to 15% per annum and Pawnee would have the option to (i) declare the Lease Promissory Note to be immediately payable, or (ii) add the accrued interest to the principal balance. As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance of the Lease Promissory Note, including accrued interest, was $75,536 and we were current and in compliance with all terms and conditions.
4.
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30 , 2011, the Company did not grant any options to purchase the Company’s common stock under the Company’s 2005 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2005 Plan”), respectively.
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, and June 30, 2011, there were no options that were cancelled or that expired, and no shares of common stock were issued upon exercise of outstanding stock options under the 2005 Plan.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company had granted options for 1,758,296 shares of the Company’s common stock that are unvested and that will result in $104,060 of compensation expense in future periods if fully vested.
Information regarding all stock options outstanding under the 2005 Plan as of June 30, 2012 is as follows:
|
|
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
price range
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Life (years)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Life (years)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Over $0.00 to $0.20
|
|
|
10,627,507
|
|
|
|
3.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,869,211
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,627,507
|
|
|
|
3.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,869,211
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the difference between the Company’s closing stock price and the exercise price of each in-the-money option on the last trading day of the period presented, which was June 30, 2012.
The Company follows the guidance in ASC 740,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(“ASC 740”) which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. This interpretation defines the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements.
Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at the end of each period, based on enacted laws and statutory rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Any liability for actual taxes to taxing authorities is recorded as income tax liability. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established against such assets where management is unable to conclude more likely than not that such asset will be realized. As of June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, the Company recognized a valuation allowance equal to 100% of the net deferred tax asset balance and the Company has no unrecognized tax benefit.
6.
|
Related Party Transactions
|
See Note 3. Notes Payable, Long Term Debt and Current Portion – Long Term Debt, and Part II – Other Information, Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds for disclosure of related party transactions.
A summary of the Company’s common stock warrant activity for the period from April 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
Outstanding, April 1, 2012
|
|
|
93,077,583
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
134,075,830
|
|
|
|
.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised (1)
|
|
|
174,271,494
|
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, June 30, 2012
|
|
|
52,881,919
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
(1) Warrants were exercised at $0.01 per common share pursuant to a temporary warrant price reset in May 2012. Please see Part II – Other Information, Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds for additional details.
|
As of June 30, 2012, the Company had the following outstanding warrants to purchase its common stock:
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Warrants
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Remaining
Life (Yrs)
|
|
|
39,416,668
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
4.78
|
|
|
12,260,001
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
2.67
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
6,750
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.07
|
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.96
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
720,000
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
|
66,500
|
|
|
$
|
8.25
|
|
|
|
2.09
|
|
|
52,881,919
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
|
A summary of the Company’s preferred stock warrant activity for the period from April 1, 2011, through June 30, 2012, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding, April 1, 2012
|
|
|
4,164
|
|
|
$
|
1,250
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Converted to Common Warrants (1)
|
|
|
4,164
|
|
|
$
|
1,250
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding, June 30, 2012
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1) All outstanding preferred stock warrants were converted to common stock warrants as part of a series of restructuring actions that closed in April 2012. Please see Part II – Other Information, Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds for additional details.
|
As previously disclosed in the Company’s definitive Information Statement on Schedule 14C filed with the SEC on March 16, 2012, the Company’s stockholders approved a proposal authorizing the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”), in its discretion, to effect a reverse split of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of up to 1-for-300. On July 27, 2012, the Board approved the reverse stock split at a 1-for-100 split ratio, and authorized management to file the documents necessary to effect the reverse split with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”).
As a result of the reverse stock split, every 100 shares of the Company’s pre-reverse split common stock will be converted automatically into one share of common stock. No cash or fractional shares will be issued in connection with the reverse split, and instead the Company will round up to the next whole share in lieu of issuing factional shares that would have been issued in the reverse split. The number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock, par value of the Company’s common stock, and rights of the Company’s common stockholders will not be affected by the reverse split. Proportional adjustments will be made to shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon exercise or conversion of the Company’s outstanding warrants and stock options in accordance with their terms.
The reverse split will become effective as and when FINRA authorizes an effective date. The Company will announce when the reverse split will become effective once that date is known. At this time, the Company cannot predict the timing of the effectiveness of the reverse split.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The discussion contained herein is for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of AeroGrow International, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” or “our”) and the notes to the financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 (this “Quarterly Report”). The following discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including statements that include words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “may,” “will,” or similar expressions that are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections, or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our intent, belief, or current expectations regarding our strategies, plans, and objectives, our product release schedules, our ability to design, develop, manufacture, and market products, the ability of our products to achieve or maintain commercial acceptance, our ability to obtain financing necessary to fund our future operations, and our ability to continue as a going concern. Such statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, the Company’s actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Factors that could cause or contribute to the differences are discussed in this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012. Except as required by applicable law or regulation, we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report. The information contained in this Quarterly Report is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. Each reader should carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by the Company in this Quarterly Report and in our other filings with the SEC.
Overview
AeroGrow International, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 25, 2002. We are in the business of developing, marketing, and distributing advanced indoor aeroponic and hydroponic garden systems. After several years of initial research and product development, we began sales activities in March 2006. Since that time we have expanded all aspects of our operations in order to take advantage of what we believe to be an attractive market opportunity. We currently offer four different indoor garden models, with each model available in different colors and trim styles, more than 40 seed kits, and various gardening and kitchen accessories. Although our business is focused on the United States and Canada, our products are available in nine other countries.
During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 (“Fiscal 2010”), March 31, 2011 (“Fiscal 2011”), and March 31, 2012 (“Fiscal 2012”) we scaled back our operations as a result of the general economic downturn and the resulting decline in consumer spending. We also determined that broad distribution through large retailers was not appropriate for a company at our stage of development because of relatively low profit margins, high capital requirements, and the operational requirements of our retailer customers.
As a result, beginning in late Fiscal 2010 and continuing through Fiscal 2012, we re-focused our efforts towards building our direct-to-consumer business, which carries higher margin opportunity. To position our business for the future, we increased the depth and breadth of our direct sales distribution channels to include a direct mail catalogue business with approximately 900,000 catalogues mailed in Fiscal 2012, significantly increased our web-selling presence and developed a robust e-mail marketing program. In addition, we have tested print ads in national magazines, infomercials, mall kiosks, and long-form and short-form infomercials, and may increase our use of these marketing vehicles in the future. In Fiscal 2012, approximately 89.8% of our total sales were to direct customers and, approximately 94.0% of total sales were to direct customers in the first three months of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2013 (“Fiscal 2013”).
To further our strategic shift towards direct-to-consumer selling, we began investigating the network marketing channel of distribution during Fiscal 2011. Network marketing, which is also known as direct selling or multi-level marketing, involves person-to-person selling through independent distributors, which may represent a potential next step in our stated strategy to move the marketing and selling of AeroGrow products closer to the end consumer. In April 2011, we entered into a Licensing Agreement with Cyrano Partners, LLC (“Cyrano”) under which Cyrano began to offer our products in the network marketing sales channel. Simultaneously we entered into a Transaction Agreement with Cyrano to form a joint venture to pursue the network marketing sales channel, subject to the achievement of certain conditions precedent, including an obligation on the part of Cyrano to raise the capital necessary to fund the joint venture. Cyrano was unable to satisfy the funding condition precedent and, in August 2011, the Licensing Agreement and the Transaction Agreement were terminated. We believe that network marketing may represent a viable sales channel for our products, and are continuing to investigate potential strategies for entering this channel of distribution.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011
Summary Overview
For the three months ended June 30, 2012, sales totaled $1,416,533, a $63,370, or 4.3%, decrease from the same period in the prior year. The decrease in revenue was more than fully accounted for by a $107,241, or 71%, reduction in sales to large retailers that resulted from our strategic decision to de-emphasize this channel because of its low margins and high capital requirements, and because of a comparison to the prior year that included in retail revenue the impact of a test of distribution into the network marketing channel. Our direct-to-consumer revenue increased by 3.0%, or $39,266, driven by a 23% increase in our advertising expenditures during the quarter, reflecting increased utilization of catalog mailings during the current year period and a comparison to the prior year in which advertising spending was severely limited by liquidity constraints, partially offset by the impact of lower average pricing for our products in the current year period. In our direct-to-consumer business, we generated $7.82 of revenue for every dollar of advertising expenditures, as compared to $9.33 in the prior year period. The decrease in dollars of revenue per dollar of advertising expense reflected the lower average pricing in the current year period combined with an increase in catalogue mailings as a percent of total marketing spending.
On a product line basis, AeroGarden sales declined by 5.2% from the prior year, while the recurring revenue from seed kit and accessories decreased by 3.8%. Both decreases primarily reflected the effect of the decline in sales into the retail channel noted above. Seed kit and accessory sales represented 63.3% percent of total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012, up slightly from 63.0% in the prior year period.
Gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was 51.1%, up from 42.5% for the year earlier period. The increase in percentage margin reflected a variety of factors during the current year period, including efficiencies achieved in our assembly, fulfillment, and distribution operations, and an increased mix of higher-margin direct-to-consumer sales.
In aggregate, operating expenses decreased $128,565, or 10.3%, from the prior year. This decline reflected the combined effects of cost saving initiatives and lower staffing than in the prior year period, partially offset by increases in advertising and spending on new product development.
Our operating loss totaled $398,616 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, $222,695, or 35.8%, lower than the $621,311 loss reported in the prior year period. The improved operating performance reflected the higher gross margin and decrease in operating expenses, partially offset by the impact of lower revenue.
Other income and expense for the three months ended June 30, 2012 totaled to a net other expense of $6,769,192, as compared to net other expense of $921,664 in the prior year period. The net other expense in the current year period included the impact of $6,648,267 in non-recurring, non-cash charges that resulted from the conversion of all of our outstanding convertible debt into common stock during the period. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, net other expense included $698,946 in non-cash charges related to our convertible debt. Excluding these charges from both years, our net other expense in the current year period totaled $120,925 as compared to $222,718 in the prior year period.
The net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $7,167,808 as compared to $1,542,975 in the prior year period. The increase in the net loss was more than fully accounted for by the non-cash accounting charges related to the conversion of convertible debt into common stock during the current year period.
The following table sets forth, as a percentage of sales, our financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and the three months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct-to-consumer
|
|
|
94.0
|
%
|
|
|
87.4
|
%
|
Retail
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Total net revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
48.9
|
%
|
|
|
57.5
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
51.1
|
%
|
|
|
42.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
31.9
|
%
|
|
|
34.7
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
|
|
48.3
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
79.3
|
%
|
|
|
84.5
|
%
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
-28.2
|
%
|
|
|
-42.0
|
%
|
Revenue
For the three months ended June 30, 2012, revenue totaled $1,416,533, a year-over-year decrease of 4.3% or $63,370 from the three months ended June 30, 2011.
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Net Revenue
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Direct-to-consumer
|
|
$
|
1,332,155
|
|
|
$
|
1,292,889
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
43,783
|
|
|
|
151,024
|
|
International
|
|
|
40,595
|
|
|
|
35,990
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,416,533
|
|
|
$
|
1,479,903
|
|
Direct-to-consumer sales for the three months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $1,332,155, up $39,266 or 3.0%, from the prior year period. The increase principally reflected the impact of a 23.0% year-over-year increase in the amount of direct response advertising, which was partially offset by the impact of lower average pricing for our products in the current year period. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, direct-to-consumer sales per dollar of advertising expense totaled $7.82 as compared to $9.33 in the prior year period. The decrease in dollars of revenue per dollar of advertising expense primarily reflected the increased utilization of catalog mailings and other marketing methods to prospect for customers in the current year period, lower average selling prices for our products year-over-year, and a comparison to the prior year in which advertising spending was severely constrained by liquidity issues.
Sales to retailer customers for the three months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $43,783, down $107,241, or 71.0%, from the same period a year earlier, principally reflecting our effective exit of the large retail sales channel because of the low margins and high capital requirements associated with this channel, and because of a comparison to the prior year that included in retail revenue the impact of a test of distribution into the network marketing channel. As of June 30, 2012, our products were carried in approximately 486 traditional “brick and mortar” storefronts in the United States and Canada, as compared to approximately 575 storefronts as of June 30, 2011. Because of the potential impact of non-“brick and mortar” retailers, including online retailers and television shopping channels which do not have storefronts, on our retail sales, we do not believe “sales per store” is a meaningful metric for assessing our retail business.
International sales for the three months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $40,595, up $4,605 from the same period in the prior fiscal year. At this time we are not actively attempting to develop our international markets and therefore sales in both periods principally reflect the timing of reorders from existing international distributors only.
Our products consist of AeroGardens, and seed kits and accessories. A summary of the sales of these two product categories for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Product Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AeroGardens
|
|
$
|
519,189
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Seed kits and accessories
|
|
|
897,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,416,533
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
% of Total Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AeroGardens
|
|
|
36.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Seed kits and accessories
|
|
|
63.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
AeroGarden sales decreased $28,375, or 5.2%, from the year earlier period reflecting the decrease in retail sales. Sales of seed kits and accessories, which represent a recurring revenue stream generated by the 1,072,228 AeroGardens we have sold to date, decreased $34,995, or 3.8%, again reflecting the lower sales to retailers. Seed kit and accessory sales declined by a smaller percentage than AeroGarden sales because these sales generally represent repeat sales to existing AeroGarden owners, rather than sales to new customers, and therefore tend to be less seasonal and less dependent on the amount of advertising expenditures than AeroGarden sales. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, sales of seed kits and accessories represented 63.3% of total revenue, as compared to 63.0% in the prior year period.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $693,332, a decrease of $157,500, or 18.5%, from the three months ended June 30, 2011. Cost of revenue includes product costs for purchased and manufactured products, freight costs for inbound freight from manufacturers, costs related to warehousing and the shipping of products to customers, credit card processing fees for direct sales, and duties and customs applicable to products imported. The dollar amount of cost of revenue decreased because of the decline in sales, as well as because of cost reductions in our seed kit assembly, fulfillment, and distribution operations. As a percent of total revenue, cost of revenue represented 48.9% of revenue as compared to 57.5% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in costs as a percent of revenue reflected the efficiencies achieved in our assembly, fulfillment, and distribution operations and a greater mix of higher-margin direct-to-consumer revenue.
Gross Margin
Our gross margin varies based upon the factors impacting net revenue and cost of revenue as discussed above, as well as the mix of our revenue that comes from the retail, direct-to-consumer, and international channels. In a direct-to-consumer sale, we recognize as revenue the full consumer purchase price for the product. In retail and international sales, by comparison, we recognize as revenue the wholesale price for the product which we charge to the retailer or international distributor. Media costs associated with direct sales are included in sales and marketing expenses. For international sales, margins are structured based on the distributor purchasing products by letter of credit or cash in advance terms with the distributor bearing all of the marketing and distribution costs within its territory. As a result, international sales generally have lower margins than domestic retail sales. The gross margin for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 was 51.1% as compared to 42.5% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing costs for the three months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $451,177, as compared to $514,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of 12.2%, or $62,823. Sales and marketing costs include all costs associated with the marketing, sales, operations, customer support, and sales order processing for our products, and consisted of the following:
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Advertising
|
|
$
|
170,457
|
|
|
$
|
138,611
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
228,411
|
|
|
|
274,985
|
|
Sales commissions
|
|
|
5,279
|
|
|
|
6,218
|
|
Trade shows
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
|
|
|
47,030
|
|
|
|
94,186
|
|
|
|
$
|
451,177
|
|
|
$
|
514,000
|
|
Advertising expense is principally comprised of the costs of development, production, printing, and postage for our catalogues, mailing and web media costs for search and affiliate web marketing programs, and developing and employing other forms of advertising. Each of these are key components of our integrated marketing strategy because they help build awareness of, and consumer demand for, our products, in addition to generating direct-to-consumer sales. Advertising expense totaled $170,457 for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, a year-over-year increase of 23.0%, or $31,846, primarily because we mailed more catalogues during the current year period, and because of the comparison to the prior year in which liquidity issues severely constrained our ability to invest in advertising spending.
Sales and marketing personnel costs include salaries, payroll taxes, employee benefits and other payroll costs for our sales, operations, customer service, graphics and marketing departments. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, personnel costs for sales and marketing were $228,411, down from $274,985 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of 16.9%. The decrease principally reflected a lower level of staffing in the current year period.
Other marketing expenses decreased year-over-year because of reductions in travel expense, inventory storage fees, order processing costs, and generally reduced spending in a variety of categories.
General and Administrative
General and administrative costs for the three months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $577,616, as compared to $714,319 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of 19.1%, or $136,703. The decrease reflected a $59,947 decrease in depreciation and amortization expense, a $55,237 decrease in legal fees, and decreases in a variety of spending categories, which were partially offset by a $26,406 increase in corporate governance costs.
Research and Development
Research and development costs for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 totaled $93,024, an increase of 321.6%, or $70,961, from the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The increase principally reflected expenses related to design and consulting service expenses we incurred to support new product development activities.
Operating Loss and EBITDA
Our operating loss for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $398,616, a decrease of $222,695 from the operating loss of $621,311 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The improved performance resulted from the higher gross margin and lower operating expenses, partially offset by the impact of lower sales.
As a non-U.S. GAAP measure of our operating performance, we track earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) as an indicator of our ability to generate cash, which we define as Operating Profit or Loss excluding the non-cash depreciation, amortization and stock based compensation expense incurred during the period. As calculated in the table below, our EBITDA loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 totaled $299,653, which was $158,659, or 34.6%, better than the $458,312 EBITDA loss recognized during the prior year quarter.
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
(398,616
|
)
|
|
$
|
(621,311
|
)
|
Add back non-cash items
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
31,737
|
|
|
|
91,240
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
4,286
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
63,384
|
|
|
|
67,473
|
|
Total non-cash items
|
|
|
98,963
|
|
|
|
162,999
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(299,653
|
)
|
|
$
|
(458,312
|
)
|
The GAAP measure most directly comparable to EBITDA is net
income/loss
. The
non-GAAP
financial
measure of EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net earnings. EBITDA is not a presentation made in accordance with GAAP and has important limitations as an analytical tool. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items that affect net earnings and is defined differently by different companies, our definition of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
Other Income and Expense
Other income and expense for the three months ended June 30, 2012 totaled to a net other expense of $6,769,192, as compared to net other expense of $921,664 in the prior year period. The net other expense in the current year period included the impact of $6,648,267 in non-recurring, non-cash charges that resulted from the conversion of all of our outstanding convertible debt into common stock during the period. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, net other expense included $698,946 in non-cash charges related to our convertible debt. Excluding these charges from both years, our net other expense in the current year period totaled $120,925 as compared to $222,718 in the prior year period.
Net Loss
For the three months ended June 30, 2012, the net loss totaled $7,167,808 as compared to a net loss of $1,542,975 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in the net loss was more than fully accounted for by the non-cash accounting charges related to the conversion of convertible debt into common stock during the current year period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
After adjusting the net loss for non-cash items and changes in operating assets and liabilities, the net cash used by operating activities totaled $98,593 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to cash provided of $10,705 in the prior year period.
Non-cash items, comprising depreciation, amortization, loss on disposal of fixed assets, bad debt allowances, expense related to the issuance of common stock and options, provisions for bad debt, amortization of debt issuance costs, amortization of the beneficial conversion feature related to convertible debentures, and interest expense from warrants issued with convertible debentures, totaled to a net gain of $6,768,326 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to a net gain of $902,353 in the prior year period.
Changes in current assets contributed net cash of $251,673 during the three months ended June 30, 2012, principally from decreases in receivables. Net accounts receivable from retailers totaled $25,807 as of June 30, 2012, representing approximately 16 days of net retail sales activity, and 54 days of net retail sales activity, at the average daily rate of sales recognized during the twelve months and three months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. The days of receivables calculation can be greatly impacted by the timing of sales to retailers during the relevant period.
As of June 30, 2012, the total inventory balance was $1,668,998, representing approximately 148 days of sales activity, and 219 days of sales activity, at the average daily rate of product cost expensed during the twelve months and three months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. The days in inventory calculation based on the three months of sales activity can be greatly impacted by the seasonality of our sales, which are at a low seasonal level during our fiscal first quarter ending June 30.
Current operating liabilities increased $49,216 during the three months ended June 30, 2012, principally because of an increase in accrued expenses, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable. Accounts payable as of June 30, 2012 totaled $476,012, representing approximately 21 days of daily expense activity, and 24 days of daily expense activity, at the average daily rate of expenses incurred during the twelve months and three months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.
Net investment activity provided $1,335 of cash, principally because of the release of $14,677 in cash that was previously restricted to support corporate obligations, which was partially offset by $13,342 in capital expenditures and investments related to patent development activity.
Net financing activity, principally reflecting the proceeds from the exercise of warrants, provided net cash of $824,450 during the three months ended June 30, 2012.
As of June 30, 2012, we had a cash balance of $1,256,848, of which $28,079 was restricted as collateral for various corporate obligations. This compares to a cash balance of $544,333 as of March 31, 2012, of which $42,756 was restricted.
As of June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, the outstanding balance of the Company’s note payable and debt, including accrued interest, was as follows:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Main Power Promissory Note
|
|
$
|
1,857,897
|
|
|
$
|
1,999,297
|
|
First Western Trust Term Loan
|
|
|
516,183
|
|
|
|
578,445
|
|
Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,032,188
|
|
Notes Payable –Credit Card Receipts-Backed Notes
|
|
|
359,765
|
|
|
|
941,815
|
|
Pawnee Promissory Note
|
|
|
75,536
|
|
|
|
74,422
|
|
Total Debt
|
|
|
2,809,381
|
|
|
|
8,626,167
|
|
Less Notes Payable and Current Portion – Long Term Debt
|
|
|
948,376
|
|
|
|
2,030,869
|
|
Long Term Debt
|
|
$
|
1,861,005
|
|
|
$
|
6,595,298
|
|
We use, or have used, a variety of debt funding sources to meet our liquidity requirements, including the following:
Main Power Promissory Note
On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement (“Letter Agreement”) with Main Power Electrical Factory, Ltd. (“Main Power”) and executed a Promissory Note. Pursuant to the terms of the Letter Agreement, Main Power agreed to release the Company from $1,386,041 of existing obligations owed by the Company to Main Power in return for the execution of the Promissory Note for the same amount. In addition, the Letter Agreement included other provisions relating to the terms and conditions under which AeroGrow purchases AeroGarden products from Main Power. The original Promissory Note had a final maturity of June 30, 2011, carried an interest rate of 8% per annum and called for principal payments of $150,000 monthly beginning January 31, 2011, with a final payment of all principal and accrued but unpaid interest due on June 30, 2011.
Effective as of December 31, 2010, AeroGrow and Main Power entered into an agreement to amend various obligations owed by AeroGrow to Main Power. As part of the amendments, AeroGrow issued a new promissory note (the “Revised Main Power Note”) in the amount of $2,162,046. The Revised Main Power Note retired and replaced the original Promissory Note, and also retired and replaced certain obligations totaling $661,446 relating to raw material and finished goods inventory purchased and/or manufactured by Main Power on behalf of AeroGrow. The Revised Main Power Note had a final maturity of May 31, 2013, and carried an interest rate of 8% per annum.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, AeroGrow fell behind on the scheduled payments due under the Revised Main Power Note because of its cash constraints and reached an informal arrangement with Main Power to defer payments while a restructuring of the note was negotiated. Subsequently the parties executed an amendment to the Revised Main Power Note that, effective as of December 31, 2011, restructured the amortization schedule for the Revised Main Power Note and extended the final maturity to December 15, 2015. In addition, Main Power agreed to waive any existing defaults under the Revised Main Power Note. The agreed revisions to the amortization schedule provide for monthly interest payments through the final maturity and principal payments totaling $3,000 during the fourth fiscal quarter of Fiscal 2012, $159,000 during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2013, $555,000 during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2014, $725,000 during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015, and $664,724 during the period April 2015 through December 2015. In addition, any utilization by AeroGrow of consignment inventory held as collateral by Main Power further reduces the amount outstanding under the Revised Main Power Note. As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance under the Revised Main Power Note, including accrued interest, totaled $1,857,897 and we were current and in compliance with all terms and conditions.
First Western Trust Term Loan
On May 21, 2010, the Company, First Western Trust Bank (“FWTB”) and Jack J. Walker, our Chairman, as guarantor, executed a business loan agreement and related promissory note (the “FWTB Term Loan”) for a four-year loan in an initial principal amount of $1 million. The FWTB Term Loan is secured by a lien on our assets. The FWTB Term Loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.25% per annum. We make equal monthly payments of principal/interest over the four-year term of the FWTB Term Loan, which has a final maturity date of May 21, 2014. The terms and conditions of the FWTB Term Loan include limitations on the Company incurring additional debt and paying dividends on our stock without the consent of FWTB. In the event of a default under the FWTB Term Loan, FWTB has the option to declare the loan immediately due and payable. As of June 30, 2012, $516,183 was outstanding under the FWTB Term Loan, including accrued interest and we were current and in compliance with all terms and conditions.
Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes
Between May and September 2010, the Company completed a private offering of $7,020,000 in Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes (the “Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes”) and warrants to purchase 70,200,000 shares of our common stock (the “Warrants”). We used the proceeds from the private offering to invest in advertising and marketing programs to support our direct-to-consumer business, provide general working capital, pay commissions and expenses related to the private offering, and repay certain outstanding obligations. The issuance was conducted in reliance upon exemptions from registration requirements under the Securities Act, including, without limitation, those under Rule 506 of Regulation D (as promulgated under the Securities Act). The Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes were offered and sold only to investors who were “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act.
The Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes carried an interest rate of 8% per year, payable quarterly in cash, additional Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes, or in registered common stock of the Company, at the option of the Company, and had a maturity of May 6, 2013. When issued, the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes could be converted into shares of our common stock at any time, initially at a conversion price of $0.10 per share (the “Conversion Price”). The Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes were secured by a subordinated lien on all assets of the Company.
Each Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of our common stock at a price of $0.20 per share, and contains customary anti-dilution rights (for stock splits, stock dividends and sales of substantially all our assets) and piggyback registration rights. The Warrants expire May 6, 2015.
In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company recorded a $6,980,400 debt discount on the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes because the combined value of the Warrants and the beneficial conversion feature (which was based on the excess of the market price of our shares on the date of issuance over the Conversion Price of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes) exceeded the amount of Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes issued. The amortization of the $6,980,400 debt discount has been reported as additional interest expense and increases in long-term debt since the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes were issued.
Amortization of the debt discount on the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes amounted to $2,397,296 and $543,457 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, respectively, including the accelerated amortization caused by the conversion of all of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes and accrued interest into common stock on April 11, 2012, as discussed below. As of June 30, 2012, there was no unamortized discount on the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes remaining.
We paid $534,263 in placement agent fees and related expenses in connection with the issuance of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes. This amount was recognized as deferred debt issuance costs on our balance sheet. These costs were amortized to expense over the life of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes. In addition, we granted warrants to purchase our common stock to the placement agent for the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes (the “Placement Agent Warrants”). We granted 7,020,000 Placement Agent Warrants with an exercise price of $0.10 per common share and 7,020,000 Placement Agent Warrants with an exercise price of $0.20 per common share. The Placement Agent Warrants had a five-year term expiring May 6, 2015 and contained a cashless exercise provision. The value of the Placement Agent Warrants was recognized as $1,518,600 in deferred debt issuance cost on our balance sheet, which was being amortized to expense over the life of the Subordinated Convertible Notes. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, the amortized deferred debt issuance costs relating to the Subordinated Convertible Notes totaled $789,335 and $155,490, respectively, including the accelerated amortization caused by the conversion of all of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes and accrued interest into common stock on April 11, 2012, as discussed below.
As of October 31, 2010 and January 31, 2011, the Company issued a total of $369,385 new Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes to pay accrued interest (the “Interest Notes”). The Interest Notes had the same terms and conditions as the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes.
Effective on April 29, 2011, a majority in interest of the holders of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes agreed to modify the terms of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes to (i) waive our obligations to make quarterly interest payments and (ii) provide that interest be paid in cash only. These modifications were effective from April 29, 2011 through January 31, 2012.
On April 11, 2012, Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes totaling $7,444,380, inclusive of accrued interest of $647,985, were converted into 297,775,249 shares of the Company’s common stock reflecting a conversion price of $0.025 per share of common stock. Subsequent to the conversions, there were no remaining Notes or accrued interest outstanding. The Note holders agreed to convert the Notes into common stock in exchange for the Company agreeing to reduce the conversion price from $0.10 per share of common stock to $0.025 per share of common stock. As a result of the conversion of the Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes into common equity, the Company recognized a total of $6,648,267 in non-cash expense comprising $3,461,637 of debt conversion costs on the exchange and $3,186,630 on the accelerated recognition of the debt discount and deferred debt issuance costs during the quarter ended June 30, 2012.
As of June 30, 2012, there were no Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes or accrued interest outstanding.
Notes Payable – 2010 Credit Card Receipts-Backed Notes
On October 28, 2010 and November 5, 2010, the Company closed on the private sale of $1.5 million in 15% secured convertible promissory notes, including $450,000 in 15% related party secured convertible promissory notes, backed by a portion of our prospective credit card receipts, (the “2010 Credit Card Notes”) and 5,000,000 warrants to purchase our common stock (the “Credit Card Warrants”) (collectively, the “2010 Credit Card Offering”). Consideration for the 2010 Credit Card Offering comprised $1.5 million in cash. Net cash proceeds to the Company after deducting a 2% sales commission (1% on company-referred investors) paid to GVC Capital LLC, our placement agent, totaled $1,474,500. In addition, the Company paid a 3% deferred sales commission (2% on company-referred investors) to the placement agent concurrently with the repayment of principal of the 2010 Credit Card Notes.
We used the proceeds from the 2010 Credit Card Offering to invest in advertising and marketing programs to support our direct-to-consumer business, provide general working capital, pay commissions and expenses related to the private offering, and repay certain outstanding obligations. The issuance of the 2010 Credit Card Offering was conducted in reliance upon exemptions from registration requirements under the Securities, including, without limitation, those under Rule 506 of Regulation D (as promulgated under the Securities Act). The 2010 Credit Card Offering was offered and sold to six (6) investors who are “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act.
The 2010 Credit Card Notes carried interest at 15% per annum, had an initial maturity of July 28, 2011, and could be converted at any time into common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $0.18 per share. 20% of our daily credit card receipts were held in escrow with First Western Trust Bank under an Escrow and Account Control Agreement to fund bi-weekly payments of principal and interest to the investors in the 2010 Credit Card Offering.
Each Credit Card Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of our common stock at a price of $0.20 per share, and contains customary anti-dilution rights (for stock splits, stock dividends and sales of substantially all our assets) and piggyback registration rights. The Warrants expire October 28, 2015.
Our obligation to repay certain of the 2010 Credit Card Notes was severally guaranteed by Jack J. Walker, our Chairman (up to $500,000), J. Michael Wolfe, Chief Executive Officer (up to $200,000) and H. MacGregor Clarke, Chief Financial Officer (up to $100,000).
In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company recorded a $90,000 debt discount on the 2010 Credit Card Offering. The amortization of the $90,000 debt discount was reported as additional interest expense and increases in notes payable over the estimated payoff period of the 2010 Credit Card Notes.
We incurred $80,659 in paid and deferred placement agent fees and related expenses in connection with the issuance of the 2010 Credit Card Notes. This amount was recognized as deferred debt issuance costs on our balance sheet. These costs were amortized to interest expense over the estimated payoff period of the 2010 Credit Card Notes. In addition, for nominal consideration, the Company sold a total of 1,333,333 warrants to purchase our common stock to the placement agent (the “Placement Agent Warrants”). Placement Agent Warrants of 833,333 were issued and had an exercise price of $0.18 per share of common stock. 500,000 of the Placement Agent Warrants have an exercise price of $0.20 per share of common stock. The Placement Agent Warrants had a five-year term and contained a cashless exercise provision. The value of the Placement Agent Warrants was recognized as $30,000 in deferred debt issuance cost on our balance sheet, which was amortized to interest expense over the estimated payoff period of the 2010 Credit Card Notes.
For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, the total amortized deferred debt issuance costs relating to the 2010 Credit Card Offering were zero and $23,401, respectively.
Effective as of July 28, 2011, a majority in interest of the holders of the 2010 Credit Card Notes agreed to extend the maturity of the 2010 Credit Card Notes to October 31, 2011. As of October 3, 2011, the 2010 Credit Card Notes were repaid in full.
Notes Payable – 2011 Credit Card Receipts-Backed Notes
During the three months ended December 31, 2011, we closed on the private sale of $1,633,776 in 17% secured promissory notes backed by a portion of our prospective credit card receipts, (the “2011 Credit Card Notes”) and a 1% share of our prospective monthly sales into the network marketing channel for a period of three years following our first sale into the network marketing channel (the “MLM Revenue Share”) (collectively, the “2011 Credit Card Offering”). Consideration for the 2011 Credit Card Offering comprised $1,477,300 in cash and the conversion of $156,476 in other obligations of the Company, including $61,476 of deferred compensation owed to executive officers of the Company. After deducting $46,565 of placement agent sales commissions (5% on third-party investors, 3% on Company-referred investors and 0% on investments by officers and directors of the Company) and expenses, net cash proceeds to the Company totaled $1,430,735. In addition, the Company will be obligated to pay a deferred sales commission to the placement agent equal to 10% of the MLM Revenue Share paid to investors in the 2011 Credit Card Offering (with the deferred sales commission reduced to 6% for payments to Company-referred investors and 0% on payments to officers and directors), concurrently with the payment of the MLM Revenue Share.
We used the proceeds from the 2011 Credit Card Offering to invest in advertising and marketing programs to support our direct-to-consumer business, purchase inventory, provide other general working capital, and pay commissions and expenses related to the private offering. The issuance of the 2011 Credit Card Offering was conducted in reliance upon exemptions from registration requirements under the Securities Act, including, without limitation, those under Rule 506 of Regulation D (as promulgated under the Securities Act). The 2011 Credit Card Offering was offered and sold only to investors who are, or the Company reasonably believed to be, “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act. Because the 2011 Credit Card Offering has not been registered under the Securities Act, the securities sold in the 2011 Credit Card Offering are “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act, and investors will not be able to sell the securities in the United States absent an effective registration statement or an applicable exemption from registration.
The 2011 Credit Card Notes bear interest at 17% per annum and have a final maturity of October 1, 2012. 20% of our daily credit card receipts will be held in escrow with First Western Trust Bank under an Escrow and Account Control Agreement to fund bi-weekly payments of principal and interest to the investors in the Credit Card Offering.
The obligation of the Company to repay the Credit Card Notes is severally guaranteed by Jack J. Walker, our Chairman (up to $510,555), J. Michael Wolfe, our Chief Executive Officer (up to $204,222) and H. MacGregor Clarke, our Chief Financial Officer (up to $102,111).
During May 2012, $340,948 in 2011 Credit Card Notes (including accrued interest) were converted to common equity pursuant to the exercise of common stock warrants. For additional information on these transactions, please see Part II – Other Information, Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance of the 2011 Credit Card Notes reported as a liability on our balance sheet, including accrued interest, totaled $359,765 and we were current and in compliance with all terms and conditions.
Pawnee Promissory Note
On November 30, 2011, the Company executed a promissory note (the “Lease Promissory Note”) in the principal amount of $116,401 in favor of Pawnee Properties, LLC (“Pawnee”). The Lease Promissory Note details the terms and conditions pursuant to which the Company will pay to Pawnee past due rent and building operating expenses related to our headquarters lease. The Lease Promissory Note carries an interest rate of 6% per annum for the first twelve months, and 8% per annum thereafter. Payments of principal and interest are due on the first day of each month during the periods: (i) December 2011 through April 2012 (aggregate payments for the period of $45,000); (ii) November 2012 through April 2013 (aggregate payments for the period of $45,000); and (iii) November 2013 through March 2014 (aggregate payments for the period of $36,064, which amount will be reduced by $4,500 in the event that all payments due during the term of the Lease Promissory Note are made on a timely basis). The Lease Promissory Note can be prepaid at any time, at the option of the Company, without penalty. In the event of a default in payment, the interest rate would be increased to 15% per annum and Pawnee would have the option to (i) declare the Lease Promissory Note to be immediately payable, or (ii) add the accrued interest to the principal balance. As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance of the Lease Promissory Note, including accrued interest, was $75,536 and we were current and in compliance with all terms and conditions.
Cash Requirements
The Company generally requires cash to:
·
|
fund our operations and working capital requirements,
|
·
|
develop and execute our product development and market introduction plans,
|
·
|
execute our sales and marketing plans,
|
·
|
fund research and development efforts, and
|
·
|
pay debt obligations as they come due.
|
At this time, we believe our existing cash and cash equivalents, along with the cash generated by our anticipated results from operations, will be sufficient to meet our needs for the next twelve months. We do intend to seek additional capital, however, to provide a cash reserve against contingencies, address the seasonal nature of our working capital needs, and to enable us to invest further in trying to increase the scale of our business. There can be no assurance we will be able to raise this additional capital, that we will be able to increase the scale of our business, or that our existing resources will be sufficient to meet all of our cash requirements. In such an event we would reduce the scale of our operations and take such actions as are available to us to reduce our cash requirements. However, there can be no assurance that such actions would be successful.
We cannot predict with certainty the cash and other ongoing operational requirements for our proposed plans as market conditions, competitive pressures, regulatory requirements, and customer requirements can change rapidly. If we are unable to raise new capital, or generate cash from operations at currently estimated levels, our ability to operate may be adversely impacted.
At this time, we do not expect to enter into additional capital leases to finance major purchases. In addition, we do not currently have any binding commitments with third parties to obtain any material amount of equity or debt financing other than the financing arrangements described in this report.
Assessment of Future Liquidity and Results of Operations
Liquidity
To assess our ability to fund ongoing operating requirements, we developed assumptions regarding operating cash flow. Critical sources of funding, and key assumptions and areas of uncertainty include:
·
|
our cash of $1,256,848 ($28,079 of which is restricted as collateral for our various corporate obligations) as of June 30, 2012,
|
·
|
our cash of $794,478 ($30,746 of which is restricted as collateral for our various corporate obligations) as of August 6, 2012,
|
·
|
continued support of, and extensions of credit by, our suppliers and lenders,
|
·
|
our historical pattern of increased sales between September and March, and lower sales volume from April through August,
|
·
|
the level of spending necessary to support our planned initiatives, and
|
·
|
our sales to consumers, retailers, and international distributors, and the resulting cash flow from operations, which will depend in great measure on the success of the planned direct-to-consumer sales initiatives.
|
Based on these assumptions, we believe our existing cash and cash equivalents, along with the cash generated by our anticipated results from operations, will be sufficient to meet our needs for the next twelve months. We do intend to seek additional capital, however, to provide a cash reserve against contingencies, address the seasonal nature of our working capital needs, and to enable us to invest further in trying to increase the scale of our business. There can be no assurance we will be able to raise this additional capital, that we will be able to increase the scale of our business, or that our existing resources will be sufficient to meet all of our cash requirements. In such an event we would reduce the scale of our operations and take such actions as are available to us to reduce our cash requirements. However, there can be no assurance that such actions would be successful.
Results of Operations
There are several factors that could affect our future results of operations. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
·
|
the effectiveness of our consumer marketing efforts in generating both direct-to-consumer sales, and sales to consumers by our retailer customer,
|
·
|
uncertainty regarding the impact of macroeconomic conditions on consumer spending,
|
·
|
uncertainty regarding the capital markets and our access to sufficient capital to support our current and projected scale of operations,
|
·
|
the seasonality of our business, in which we have historically experienced higher sales volume during the fall and winter months (September through March), and
|
·
|
a continued, uninterrupted supply of product from our third-party manufacturing suppliers in China.
|
During Fiscal 2010, Fiscal 2011, and Fiscal 2012 we took a number of actions to address our liquidity issues. Specifically, we re-focused our efforts on building our direct-to-consumer business, which we believe carries higher margin opportunities than our retailer business. We also reduced the number of retailers that carry our products in order to focus on those retailers that have proven to be the best and most profitable business partners. During Fiscal 2010 we issued approximately $6.7 million of convertible preferred stock to re-capitalize the Company, restructured the amounts and payment timing of certain of our accounts payable, and reduced the amount of interest-bearing debt outstanding. Furthermore, during Fiscal 2011 we issued $7,020,000 in Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes and $1.5 million in 2010 Credit Card Notes (as described above).
In Fiscal 2012, we restructured the amounts and payment timing of certain of our accounts payable, issued $1.6 million in 2011 Credit Card Notes (as described above), restructured the payment schedule for the Revised Main Power Note, and received approval from our stockholders and affected creditors to convert our Series A Preferred Stock and Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes into common stock. These conversions closed on April 11, 2012. In addition, during May 2012, we offered our warrant holders the opportunity to exercise their warrants at a reduced price, and raised $1.59 million in common equity capital. (For additional information regarding the conversion of our convertible securities into common stock and the reduction in the warrant exercise price, please see Part II – Other Information, Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.) As a result of these efforts, we believe we can meet our cash requirements for the next twelve months. We do intend to seek additional capital, however, to provide a cash reserve against contingencies, and to enable us to invest further in trying to increase the scale of our business. There can be no assurance we will be able to raise this additional capital, or that our existing resources will be sufficient to meet all of our cash requirements. In such an event we would reduce the scale of our operations and take such actions as are available to us to reduce our cash requirements. However, there can be no assurance that such actions would be successful.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Other than our headquarter facility lease commitment incurred in the normal course of business, we do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or liabilities, guarantee contracts, retained or contingent interest in transferred assets, and have not entered into any contracts for financial derivative such as futures, swaps, and options.