Item
5.03.
|
Amendments
to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal
Year.
|
On
December 2, 2006, the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Hartman Commercial
Properties REIT (the “Company”) adopted resolutions providing that the Company
is subject to various provisions of Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the Maryland
General
Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) and authorized the Company to file Articles
Supplementary with the
State
Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland
.
The effective date of the Articles Supplementary is December 6,
2006.
The
MGCL provides that the Board may, by resolution, elect to be subject to
all or
part of Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the MGCL, including Sections 3-803, 3-804
and
3-805 relating to classification of directors, removal of directors and
filling
of vacancies and special meetings of stockholders, respectively. In order
to
avoid numerous and costly special shareholder meetings and to promote stability
within the Board, the Board’s independent trustees, acting in the best interest
of the shareholders of the Company, adopted resolutions electing to be
governed
by Sections 3-803, 3-804(a), 3-804(b) and 3-805 of the MGCL and subsequently
filed Articles Supplementary effectuating this election. Descriptions of
each
provision within the Articles Supplementary are set forth below.
The
Articles Supplementary provide that the Company shall be governed by Section
3-803, which provides for the classification of the Board into three classes
with terms expiring at the 2007, 2008 and 2009 annual meetings, respectively.
By
resolution, the Board, effective upon filing of the Articles Supplementary,
designated current trustee Chris Minton as a Class I trustee, who will
serve
until the Company’s annual meeting held in 2007, at which time he will be
subject to renomination and reelection. The Board designated current trustee
Chand Vyas as a Class II trustee to serve until the Company’s annual meeting
held in 2008, at which time he will be subject to renomination and reelection.
Finally, the Board designated current trustees James Mastandrea and Jack
Mahaffey as Class III trustees to serve until the Company’s annual meeting held
in 2009, at which time they will be subject to renomination and reelection.
Prior to filing the Articles Supplementary, membership of the Board existed
without regard to class, and all four trustees were subject to renomination
and
reelection at each annual meeting of the shareholders.
Second,
the Articles Supplementary provide that the Company shall be governed by
Section
3-804(a), which provides that the Company’s shareholders may remove any member
of the Board by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the
votes
entitled to be cast by the shareholders generally in the election of directors.
Prior to filing the Articles Supplementary, the removal of any member of
the
Board required the affirmative vote of a simple majority of all the votes
entitled to be cast by the shareholders generally in the election of directors.
Third,
the Articles Supplementary provide that the Company shall be governed by
Section
3-804(b), which provides that the number of directors of a corporation
shall be
fixed only by vote of the board of directors. Prior to filing the Articles
Supplementary, the number of directors could have been fixed by an affirmative
vote of the majority of the Company’s shareholders.
Finally,
the Articles Supplementary provide that the Company shall be governed by
Section
3-805, which provides that the secretary of the Company may call a special
meeting of shareholders only on the written request of the shareholders
entitled
to cast at least a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the
meeting
and only in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 2-502(b)(2)
and
(3) and (e) of the MGCL. The Company’s election to be governed under Section
3-805 changes the requirement that only ten percent of the shareholders
entitled
to cast votes at a meeting is needed to require the secretary of the Company
to
call a special meeting.
On
December 2, 2006, the Board also adopted resolutions to amend the Company’s
Bylaws. December 2, 2006 is the effective date of these amendments. The
first
amendment repealed Article II, Section 13 of the Bylaws, which permitted
shareholder action by written consent. Prior to its repeal, Article II,
Section
13 provided that “any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of
shareholders may be taken without a meeting if a consent in writing, setting
forth such action, is signed by shareholders entitled to cast a sufficient
number of votes to approve the matter, as required by statute, the Declaration
of Trust or these Bylaws, and such consent is filed with the minutes of
proceedings of the shareholders.”
In
contemplating this amendment, the Board determined that a conflict existed
between the Company’s Declaration of Trust, which requires a special meeting of
shareholders to remove a Trustee, and the Company’s Bylaws. Moreover, in light
of the fact that the rules of the national stock exchanges generally prohibit
action by written consent, a fact that would mandate repeal if the Company’s
shares were to eventually be listed on a national exchange, the Board believed
it be in the best interests of the Company’s shareholders to exercise its
exclusive power to repeal Article II, Section 13 of the Bylaws.
The
second amendment to the Company’s Bylaws repealed Article II, Section 14, which
opted out of the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. In general, the
Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act limits an “acquiring shareholder’s” right
to vote any shares that constitute control shares and are acquired without
consent of a company’s board. Prior to its repeal, Article II, Section 14 of the
Company’s Bylaws provided that: “Notwithstanding any other provision of the
Declaration of Trust or these Bylaws, Title 3, Subtitle 7 of the Maryland
General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) (or any successor statute) shall not apply
to any acquisition by any person of shares of beneficial interest of the
Trust.
This section may be repealed, in whole or in part, at any time, whether
before
or after an acquisition of control shares and, upon such repeal, may, to
the
extent provided by any successor bylaw, apply to any prior or subsequent
control
share acquisition.” The Board, believing it advisable and in the best interests
of the shareholders to be subject to the provisions of the Maryland Control
Share Acquisition Act, repealed this provision of the Company’s
Bylaws.
Copies
of the Articles Supplementary filed with the State Department of Assessments
and
Taxation of Maryland and the Company’s First Amendment to Bylaws are furnished
as Exhibits 3(i).1 and 3(ii).1, respectively, to this Current Report on
Form
8-K.
In
addition, on December 6, 2006, the Company issued a press release announcing,
among other things, the changes described herein. A copy of the press release
is
furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.