UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-K

 


 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2003

 

Commission File Number: 0-25629

 


 

CARROLS CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

Delaware   16-0958146

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

968 James Street

Syracuse, New York

  13203
(Address of principal executive office)   (Zip Code)
     

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (315) 424-0513

 


 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

9  1 / 2 % SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES DUE 2008

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x      No   ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act)    Yes   ¨     No   x

 

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant: No voting stock is held by non-affiliates.

 

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of April 30, 2004 is 10.

 



The Company uses a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to December 31. For convenience, all references herein to the fiscal years ended December 30, 2001, December 29, 2002 and December 28, 2003 will hereinafter be referred to as the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively.

 

PART I

 

This 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements which constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the Company and its management team. Investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among other things, competitive conditions, economic and regulatory factors, general economic conditions particularly at the retail level, fluctuations in commodity prices, availability of restaurant supply and distribution of product, liquidity of major distributors, labor and employee benefit costs, the outcome of pending or yet-to-be instituted legal proceedings, the ability of the Company to manage its growth and successfully implement its business strategy, environmental conditions and regulations, weather conditions, significant disruptions in service or supply by any of our suppliers, risks associated with the expansion of our business, general risks associated with the food industry, our inability to integrate any businesses we acquire, our borrowing costs and credit ratings, which may be influenced by credit ratings of our competitors, the risk of events similar to these of September 11, 2001 or an outbreak or escalation of any insurrection or armed conflict involving the United States or any other national or international calamity, factors that affect the food industry generally, including recalls if products became adulterated or misbranded, liability if product consumption causes injury, ingredient disclosure and labeling laws and regulations and the possibility that consumers could lose confidence in the safety and quality of certain food products, as well as recent publicity concerning the health implications of obesity and transfatty acids, the availability and terms of necessary or desirable financing or refinancing and other risks and uncertainties that are discussed herein.

 

We use the terms EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, restaurant level EBITDA and EBITDA margins because we believe they are useful financial indicators for measuring the ability to service and/or incur indebtedness. They should not be considered as an alternative to net income as a measure of operating results or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These terms are more fully described under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on Page 32.

 

Restatement

 

We have restated our financial statements including applicable footnotes for periods ended prior to December 31, 2003 to report real estate transactions for 86 restaurants consummated during 1991 to 2000 as financing transactions under SFAS No. 98 “Accounting for Leases” rather than as sale/leaseback transactions as previously reported. The impact of the restatement is to record on our balance sheets the property and equipment of the restaurants subject to these transactions and record the proceeds from these transactions, (including the gains previously deferred) as a form of debt financing. The restatement also impacted our operating results by increasing the depreciation expense for the property and equipment subject to these transactions and recharacterizing the lease payments previously reported as rent expense for these restaurants as principal repayments and interest expense. There was no impact on sale/leaseback transactions that were consummated in 2002 and 2003.

 

As a result of the restatement, we were in default related to certain required financial leverage ratios and other covenants under our senior secured credit facility. We have obtained a waiver from our senior secured lenders of any prior non-compliance and defaults resulting from the restatement. In addition, our senior secured credit facility has been amended to exclude all adjustments resulting from this restatement on our financial covenant requirements and to treat on a prospective basis the specified leases as if no restatement or recharacterization has occurred.

 

The restatement discussed above was due to lease provisions in certain of our sale/leaseback transactions, which in our opinion have minimal commercial impact upon the relevant terms of the lease. We may amend these leases in the future to address these provisions and to qualify them for treatment as operating leases as originally intended. However, no such assurances can be made as to when or whether any or all of such leases will be amended.

 

See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a complete discussion of the restatement. All previously reported amounts affected by the restatement that appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been restated.

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

 

Overview

 

Who We Are

 

We are one of the largest restaurant companies in the United States operating 532 restaurants in 16 states as of December 31, 2003. We operate three restaurant concepts that provide balance in terms of our revenues and diversification with regard to restaurant concept as well as the geographic location of our restaurants. We are the largest Burger King ® franchisee in the world and have operated Burger King restaurants since 1976. We also own and operate two regional Hispanic restaurant companies: Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical. At December 31, 2003, we operated 351 Burger King restaurants located in 13 Northeastern, Midwestern and Southeastern states. Our Burger King restaurant sales were $353.3 million in 2003, or 55% of our total revenues. Our Hispanic restaurant brands collectively operate or franchise more than 200 restaurants and comprised 45% of 2003 revenues.

 

In 1998 we acquired Pollo Tropical Inc., a restaurant chain featuring grilled marinated chicken and authentic “made from scratch” side dishes, for a cash purchase price of approximately $95 million. Since the acquisition, we have expanded this concept by over 65% by opening 24 new Pollo Tropical restaurants. At December 31, 2003 we operated 60 company owned Pollo Tropical restaurants in Florida and franchised 24 Pollo Tropical restaurants, 19 of which are in Puerto Rico. Total Pollo Tropical revenues were $110.2 million in 2003.

 

In December 2000 we acquired Taco Cabana Inc., a restaurant chain featuring Tex-Mex style food including flame-grilled beef and chicken fajitas, quesadillas, and fresh flour tortillas, for a total purchase price of approximately $155 million. At December 31, 2003 we operated 121 company owned Taco Cabana restaurants located in Texas and Oklahoma and franchised nine Taco Cabana restaurants. Since the acquisition we have opened 21 new Taco Cabana restaurants and have closed 15 restaurants, including seven restaurants in the Phoenix, Arizona market. Total Taco Cabana revenues were $181.5 million in 2003.

 

2


Due primarily to our acquisition of Taco Cabana in 2000 as well as the construction of new restaurants over the past five years, total revenues for our Hispanic brands have increased from $83.8 million in 1999 to $291.7 million in 2003. During this time frame total Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and other income and expense) from our Hispanic brands has increased over 250% from $18.6 million in 1999 to $47.0 million in 2003. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on page 32.

 

We are a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1968.

 

The Industry

 

We operate restaurants in the quick-service and quick-casual restaurant industry segments, which include hamburgers, pizza, chicken, various types of sandwiches, Mexican and other ethnic foods. Our Burger King restaurants operate in the hamburger segment of the quick-service restaurant industry. Our Hispanic brands, Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical, are part of the quick-casual segment, which combines the convenience of quick-service restaurants with the menu variety, use of fresh ingredients and food quality of casual dining.

 

According to Technomic Information Services (Technomic), the quick-service segment of the restaurant industry had sales of approximately $136.3 billion in 2002. According to Technomic, sales in this segment grew at a compound annual rate of 4.6% between 1997 and 2002 and are projected to increase at a compound annual rate of 4.5% between 2002 and 2007, including an increase of 3.0% in the hamburger segment. We believe that this growth reflects consumers’ desire for a convenient, reasonably priced restaurant experience. In addition, the consumer’s need for meals prepared outside of the home, including takeout, has increased significantly over past historical levels as a result of the greater numbers of working women and single parent families.

 

Hispanic Brands

 

Our Hispanic brands will also benefit from additional factors such as the growing baby boomer demand for quick-casual dining and increasing consumer demand for, and acceptance of, variety and ethnic foods. To a lesser extent, we also believe that our Hispanic brands will benefit from the growing U.S. Hispanic population. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, growth of the Hispanic population is projected to outpace overall population growth and increase from 11.8% of the total population in 2000 to 18.2% by 2025.

 

3


Taco Cabana

 

Our Taco Cabana restaurants feature fresh, premium quality Tex-Mex and traditional Mexican style food. Menu items include flame-grilled beef and chicken fajitas, quesadillas, traditional Mexican and American breakfasts, other Tex-Mex dishes and fresh-made flour tortillas. Many of Taco Cabana’s menu items are “sharing” foods designed for families and large groups. Unlike many of its competitors, most menu items are made fresh daily in each of our Taco Cabana restaurants. Taco Cabana restaurants also offer a variety of beverage choices including margaritas and beer.

 

Taco Cabana pioneered the Mexican patio café concept with its first restaurant in San Antonio, Texas in 1978 and of the 121 restaurants we operated at December 31, 2003, 115 are located in Texas. For the year ended December 31, 2003, Taco Cabana’s average restaurant sales were approximately $1.52 million.

 

Our acquisitions of Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical have allowed us to:

 

  diversify our revenue base;

 

  enhance our overall operating margins and cash flow;

 

  expand our geographic presence into areas with high population growth;

 

  capitalize on the significant growth of the Hispanic population in the United States; and

 

  increase our opportunities to build additional restaurants.

 

Pollo Tropical

 

We operate and franchise Pollo Tropical quick-casual restaurants featuring fresh grilled chicken marinated in a proprietary blend of tropical fruit juices and spices and authentic “made from scratch” side dishes. The menu emphasizes freshness and quality with a focus on flavorful chicken served “hot off the grill.” Pollo Tropical restaurants combine high quality, distinctive menu items and an inviting tropical setting with the convenience and value of quick-service restaurants.

 

Pollo Tropical opened its first company-owned restaurant in 1988 in Miami and its first international franchised restaurant in 1995 in Puerto Rico. At December 31, 2003, we owned and operated a total of 60 restaurants, 51 of which are located in south Florida under the trade name Pollo Tropical and nine under the trade name TropiGrill in central Florida. We also franchised 24 Pollo Tropical restaurants, 19 of which are located in Puerto Rico, four in Ecuador and one in Miami. For the year ended December 31, 2003, Pollo Tropical’s average restaurant sales were approximately $1.84 million, which we believe is among the highest in its industry segment.

 

Burger King

 

Burger King Corporation (“BKC”) is the second largest quick-service hamburger restaurant chain in the world. According to BKC, at December 31, 2003 there were approximately 11,300 restaurants in 58 countries worldwide, including approximately 7,800 throughout the United States. Total worldwide restaurant sales for the year ended June 30, 2003 were approximately $11.1 billion, of which approximately $7.9 billion were in the United States. Burger King restaurants are quick-service restaurants of distinctive design that feature flame-broiled hamburgers and serve several widely known, trademarked products, the most popular being the WHOPPER ® sandwich.

 

We believe that the primary competitive advantages of Burger King restaurants are:

 

  brand recognition;

 

  convenience of location;

 

  speed of service;

 

  quality; and

 

  price.

 

4


Competitive Strengths

 

We attribute our success in the quick-casual and quick-service restaurant industry segments to the following competitive strengths:

 

Strong Brand Names - We believe our restaurant concepts are highly recognized brands in their market areas.

 

Our Hispanic Brands - Pollo Tropical is one of the most highly recognized quick-casual restaurant brands in its core markets of south and central Florida. Taco Cabana is also a highly recognized quick-casual brand in its core Texas markets. Of the 121 Taco Cabana restaurants we currently operate, a total of 115 restaurants are concentrated in five major markets: San Antonio, Houston, Dallas/Fort Worth, Austin and El Paso. We believe that the following factors have led to the success of both of these concepts:

 

  strong brand awareness in their respective core markets;

 

  high quality, freshly prepared food;

 

  high frequency of visits and loyalty among their core customers; and

 

  strategic positioning of the menu to capitalize on the growing consumer preference for variety including ethnic foods.

 

Burger King - Since the formation of BKC in 1954, the Burger King brand has become one of the most recognized brands in the restaurant industry. BKC spends between 4% and 5% of total system sales on advertising per year (approximately $2.3 billion over the past five years) to sustain and increase this high brand awareness. We believe strong brand recognition, coupled with the quality and value of the food and convenience of its restaurants, provide opportunities for growth for the Burger King brand.

 

Stable and Diversified Cash Flows - We believe that the stability of our operating cash flows is due to the proven success of our restaurant concepts and our consistent focus on restaurant operations. Over the past five years, our restaurant level EBITDA (Adjusted EBITDA before general and administrative expenses) margins for our Burger King restaurants ranged between 15.3% and 17.5% and averaged 16.6%. Over the same period, restaurant level EBITDA margins for our Pollo Tropical restaurants have ranged between 25.3% and 28.3% and averaged 26.8%. For the past three years the restaurant level EBITDA margins for our Taco Cabana restaurants have ranged between 19.3% and 21.2% and averaged 20.2%. Our aggregate cash flow from operations has increased from $39.1 million in 1999 to $48.2 million in 2003. We believe that the stability and diversification of our cash flows provide us with adequate liquidity to meet our cash flow requirements. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on page 32.

 

Diversified Locations and Restaurant Concepts - Our Burger King restaurants are geographically dispersed over 13 states in the Northeast, Southeast and Great Lakes regions. Our acquisitions of Pollo Tropical, with its restaurants in Florida, and Taco Cabana, with its restaurants in Texas and Oklahoma, have further expanded our geographic presence. We believe that multiple concepts operating in diverse geographic areas enable us to capitalize on regions that have rapidly growing populations and to further reduce our dependence on the economic performance of any one particular region or restaurant concept.

 

Largest Burger King Franchisee - We are the largest Burger King franchisee in the world. We believe that our leadership position, together with our experienced management team, effective management information systems, and an extensive infrastructure enable us to operate more efficiently and better enhance restaurant margins and overall performance levels than most other Burger King franchisees. These strengths also enable us to continue to develop new restaurants and to selectively acquire additional Burger King restaurants.

 

Experienced Management Team with a Significant Equity Stake - Our senior management team, headed by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Alan Vituli and President and Chief Operating Officer Daniel T. Accordino, has a long and successful history of developing, acquiring and operating limited-service restaurants for the Company. Our management team owns (on a diluted basis) approximately 16% of Carrols Holdings Corporation (“Carrols Holdings”), which owns 100% of our stock.

 

5


Business Strategy

 

Our business strategy is to continue to increase revenues and cash flow through the construction of new restaurants, selective acquisitions, improvements in operating efficiencies and enhancements in our marketing and product development activities. Based on our historical performance, we believe that this business strategy represents a low-risk growth plan. Our strategy is based on the following components:

 

Leverage Strong Brand Names - We realize significant benefits as an owner of the Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana restaurant concepts and as a Burger King franchisee. These benefits are the result of the following:

 

  strong recognition of the Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana brands in their core markets;

 

  ability to manage brand awareness, marketing and product development for our Hispanic brands;

 

  widespread recognition of the Burger King brand and flagship WHOPPER ® product supported by the amount and penetration of BKC’s advertising; and

 

  ability to capitalize on BKC’s research and development and product development capabilities.

 

Achieve Operating Efficiencies - We maintain a disciplined commitment to increasing the profitability of our existing restaurants. Our large base of restaurants, management structure and management information systems enable us to optimize operating efficiencies for our restaurants. We are able to control restaurant labor and food costs through the use of our sophisticated management information and point-of-sale systems as well as to effectively manage our restaurant operations and ensure consistent application of operating controls. Our size enables us to realize benefits from improved bargaining power for purchasing and cost management initiatives. We believe these factors provide the basis for increased unit and company profitability.

 

Consistently Provide Superior Customer Satisfaction - Our operations are focused on achieving a high level of customer satisfaction through quick, accurate and high-quality customer service. We have uniform operating standards and restaurant-level objectives in each of our brands for the following areas:

 

  food quality;

 

  preparation and selection of menu items;

 

  speed of service;

 

  maintenance and cleanliness; and

 

  employee conduct.

 

We closely supervise the operation of all of our restaurants to help ensure that standards and policies are followed and that product quality, customer service and cleanliness of the restaurants are maintained at high levels. At each of our brands we also employ external services to visit our restaurants on an unannounced basis to measure and evaluate our execution of these operating policies.

 

6


Open Additional Restaurants - We believe that many of our existing markets will continue to provide opportunities for the development of new restaurants. We look to develop restaurants in markets we believe are underpenetrated and where the demographic characteristics are favorable for the development of new restaurants. Our staff of real estate and construction professionals are responsible for our new restaurant development. Before developing a new restaurant, we conduct an extensive site selection and evaluation process that includes in-depth demographic, market and financial analysis. By selectively increasing the number of restaurants we operate in a particular market, we can increase brand awareness and effectively leverage our restaurant management oversight, corporate infrastructure and local marketing expenditures.

 

We believe there may be opportunities to expand our Burger King store units selectively as franchisees seek liquidity through the sale of their restaurants. We believe that selective acquisitions of additional Burger King restaurants could result in operating efficiencies from our proven abilities to improve controls over restaurant food costs, efficiently utilize labor, and achieve increased economies of scale by leveraging our infrastructure and control systems.

 

Overview of Restaurant Concepts

 

Burger King Restaurants

 

“Have It Your Way” ® service, flame broiling, generous portions and competitive prices characterize the Burger King system marketing strategy. Our Burger King restaurants feature flame-broiled hamburgers and other sandwiches, the most popular of which is the WHOPPER ® sandwich. The WHOPPER is a large, flame-broiled hamburger on a toasted bun garnished with a combination of mayonnaise, lettuce, onions, pickles and tomatoes. The basic menu of all Burger King restaurants consists of hamburgers, cheeseburgers, chicken and fish sandwiches, breakfast items, french fried potatoes, onion rings, salads, shakes, desserts, soft drinks, milk and coffee. In addition, promotional menu items are introduced periodically for limited periods. BKC continually seeks to develop new products as it endeavors to enhance the menu and service of Burger King restaurants.

 

Our Burger King restaurants are typically open seven days per week with minimum operating hours from 6:00 AM to 11:00 PM. Burger King restaurants are quick-service restaurants of distinctive design and are generally located in high-traffic areas throughout the U.S. We believe that the primary competitive advantages of Burger King restaurants are:

 

  brand recognition;

 

  convenience of location;

 

  speed of service;

 

  quality; and

 

  price.

 

Burger King restaurants appeal to a broad spectrum of consumers, with multiple day-part meal segments that appeal to different groups of consumers.

 

7


Our Burger King restaurants consist of one of several building types with various seating capacities. BKC’s traditional freestanding restaurant contains approximately 2,800 to 3,200 square feet with seating capacity for 90 to 100 customers, has drive-thru service windows, and has adjacent parking areas. At December 31, 2003, 340 of our 351 Burger King restaurants were freestanding.

 

Pollo Tropical Restaurants

 

Pollo Tropical restaurants combine high quality, distinctive taste and an inviting tropical setting with the convenience and value pricing of quick-service restaurants. Pollo Tropical restaurants offer a unique selection of food items reflecting tropical and Caribbean influences and feature grilled fresh chicken marinated in a proprietary blend of tropical fruit juices and spices. Chicken is grilled in view of customers on large, custom, open-flame grills. Over time Pollo Tropical has broadened its selection by introducing additional menu items such as roast pork, a line of “TropiChops ® ” (a bowl containing rice, black beans, chicken or pork), a line of premium sandwiches and grilled ribs that feature a selection of barbeque sauces. We also feature an array of distinctive and popular side dishes, including black beans and rice, yucatan fries and sweet plantains, as well as more traditional menu items such as french fries, corn and tossed and caesar salads. We also offer uniquely Hispanic tropical desserts, such as flan and tres leches.

 

Our Pollo Tropical restaurants incorporate high ceilings, large windows, tropical plants, light colored woods, decorative tiles, a visually distinctive exterior entrance tower, lush landscaping and other signature architectural features, all designed to create an airy, inviting and tropical atmosphere. We design our restaurants to conveniently serve a high volume of customer traffic while retaining an inviting, casual atmosphere.

 

Our Pollo Tropical restaurants are generally open for lunch, dinner and late night orders seven days per week from 11:00 AM to midnight and offer sit-down dining, counter take-out and drive-thru service to accommodate the varied schedules of families, business people, students and other time-sensitive individuals. Our menu offers a variety of portion sizes to accommodate a single customer, family or large group. Pollo Tropical restaurants also offer an economical catering menu, with special prices and portions to serve parties in excess of 25 people.

 

Our Pollo Tropical restaurants typically provide seating for 80 to 100 customers and provide drive-thru service. All of our Pollo Tropical restaurants are freestanding buildings except for four locations contained within strip shopping centers and one street-level storefront location in an office building. Our typical freestanding Pollo Tropical restaurant ranges between 2,800 and 3,200 square feet in size.

 

Taco Cabana

 

Taco Cabana restaurants combine generous portions of fresh, premium quality Tex-Mex and traditional Mexican style food with the convenience and value pricing of quick-service restaurants. The restaurants provide interior, semi-enclosed and patio dining areas with a festive Mexican theme. Menu items include flame-grilled beef and chicken fajitas served on sizzling iron skillets, quesadillas, traditional Mexican and American breakfasts, other Tex-Mex dishes and fresh, hot flour tortillas. Most of the menu items offered at each of our Taco Cabana restaurants are prepared at each restaurant from fresh meat and produce ingredients delivered by suppliers to the restaurant, usually three times each week. Taco Cabana is committed to differentiating itself from other quick-casual competitors by utilizing fresh, high quality ingredients as well as preparing most items “from scratch”. In order to simplify operations and provide a more consistent product, Taco Cabana also uses a number of pre-prepared items.

 

8


Taco Cabana restaurants average approximately 3,200 square feet (exclusive of the exterior dining area) and provide seating for approximately 80 customers, with additional outside patio seating for approximately 50 customers. Taco Cabana restaurants are typically distinctive in appearance, conveying a Mexican theme and permitting easy identification by passing motorists. Our Taco Cabana restaurants feature rounded fronts, as well as Southwest accents such as a clay tile roof, heavy wood beams and a trellis that shades the patio area, and the use of bright colors outside and inside, including colored tiles, doors, windows and awnings. Corrugated metal wall panels, aged wood finishes and distressed stainless steel counter tops are featured inside.

 

Taco Cabana’s interior restaurant design features display cooking that enables customers to observe fresh fajitas cooking on a grill, a machine making fresh, hot flour tortillas and the preparation of other food items. Upon entry, the customer places an order selected from an overhead menu board, proceeds down a service line to where the order is picked up, and then passes a Salsa Bar en route to the dining area. The distinctive Salsa Bar offers Taco Cabana customers freshly prepared, authentic Tex-Mex ingredients such as Salsa de Fuego (made with charred peppers and tomatoes), pico de gallo and salsa (all “made from scratch” throughout the day at each restaurant), cilantro, pickled jalapeno slices, crisp chopped onions and fresh sliced limes. Depending on the season, time of day and personal preference, our customers can choose to dine in the restaurant’s brightly colored and festive interior dining area or in either the semi-enclosed or outdoor patio areas.

 

Our Taco Cabana restaurants provide the convenience of drive-thru windows as well as the ability for customers to dine-in or take-out, as they choose. A majority of our Taco Cabana restaurants are open 24 hours a day. Our hours of operation are continually evaluated for economic viability on a market and individual restaurant basis.

 

Restaurant Economics

 

Burger King Restaurants

 

For the year ended December 31, 2003, our Burger King restaurants generated average sales of approximately $1,003,000 and average restaurant level EBITDA of approximately $161,000. Drive-thru sales contributed 61.8% of all restaurant sales. In all but 14 locations, which are primarily in malls, our Burger King restaurants have a drive-thru window. Percentages of total sales by day part were as follows for the year ended December 31, 2003:

 

Breakfast

   14.6%

Lunch

   33.4%

Dinner

   26.9%

Late Afternoon & Late Night

   Remainder

 

The average sales transaction was $4.47 in 2003.

 

The cost of the franchise fee, equipment, seating, signage and other interior costs of a standard new Burger King restaurant is approximately $385,000 (excluding the cost of the land, building, and site improvements). The cost of land generally ranges from $400,000 to $525,000. The cost of building and site improvements generally ranges from $550,000 to $625,000. We typically lease the real estate associated with our Burger King restaurants.

 

9


Pollo Tropical Restaurants

 

For the year ended December 31, 2003, our Pollo Tropical restaurants generated average sales of approximately $1,838,000 and average restaurant level EBITDA of approximately $464,000. Pollo Tropical restaurant sales are well balanced by method of service and by day part. For 2003, drive-thru sales contributed 42.2% of restaurant sales and take-out sales accounted for 20.8% of total sales. Percentages of total sales by day part are as follows:

 

Lunch

   45.9 %

Dinner and Late Night

   54.1 %

 

The average sales transaction was $8.18 in 2003.

 

The cost of equipment, seating, signage and other interior costs of a standard new Pollo Tropical restaurant are approximately $350,000 (excluding the cost of the land, building, and site improvements). The cost of land generally ranges from $550,000 to $750,000. The cost of building and site improvements generally ranges from $650,000 to $800,000. We generally lease the real estate associated with our Pollo Tropical restaurants.

 

Taco Cabana Restaurants

 

For the year ended December 31, 2003, our Taco Cabana restaurants generated average restaurant sales of $1,523,000 and average restaurant level EBITDA of $293,000. Drive-thru sales contributed 46.6% of all restaurant sales.

 

The majority of our Taco Cabana restaurants are open 24 hours a day. Sales at the restaurants are balanced by day part. Percentages of total sales by day part are as follows:

 

Breakfast

   15.8%

Lunch

   22.7%

Dinner

   25.3%

Late Night (9pm to Midnight)

   14.5%

Other (2pm to 5pm and Midnight to 6am)

   Remainder

 

The average sales transaction was $6.66 in 2003.

 

The cost of equipment, seating, signage and other interior costs of a standard new Taco Cabana restaurant total approximately $420,000 (excluding the cost of the land, building and site improvements). The cost of the land generally ranges from $650,000 to $800,000. The cost of building and site improvements generally ranges from $750,000 to $850,000. We generally lease the real estate associated with our Taco Cabana restaurants.

 

10


Restaurant Locations

 

The following table sets forth the locations of the 351 Burger King restaurants we operated at December 31, 2003:

 

State


  

Total

Restaurants


Connecticut

   1

Indiana

   5

Kentucky

   10

Maine

   5

Massachusetts

   1

Michigan

   26

New Jersey

   2

New York

   145

North Carolina

   40

Ohio

   82

Pennsylvania

   12

South Carolina

   21

Vermont

   1
    

Total

   351
    

 

As of December 31, 2003, we owned and operated 60 Pollo Tropical restaurants, all located in Florida. In addition, of our 24 franchised Pollo Tropical restaurants, 19 are located in Puerto Rico; four are located in Ecuador and one in Miami.

 

As of December 31, 2003, we owned and operated 121 Taco Cabana restaurants and franchised nine Taco Cabana restaurants located in the following states:

 

       Owned

     Franchised

     Total

Texas

     115      5      120

Oklahoma

     6      —        6

New Mexico

     —        2      2

Georgia

     —        1      1

Indiana

     —        1      1
      
    
    

Total

     121      9      130
      
    
    

 

11


Operations

 

Management Structure

 

We conduct substantially all of our executive management, finance, marketing and operations support functions from our corporate headquarters in Syracuse, New York, our Pollo Tropical headquarters in Miami, Florida and our Taco Cabana headquarters in San Antonio, Texas. Our Burger King operations are overseen by four Regional Directors, three of whom are Vice Presidents, that have an average of 24 years of Burger King restaurant experience. Forty-five district supervisors that have an average of 19 years of restaurant management experience in the Burger King system support the Regional Directors. The management structure for Pollo Tropical consists of an Executive Vice President, who has over 30 years experience in the restaurant industry, and a Vice President of Operations supported by seven district supervisors. The management structure of Taco Cabana consists of an Executive Vice President of Operations, who has over 30 years of restaurant experience, and two Regional Vice Presidents supported by 17 district supervisors.

 

For each of our brands, a district supervisor is responsible for the direct oversight of the day-to-day operations of an average of approximately seven restaurants. Typically, district supervisors have previously served as restaurant managers at one of our restaurants. Both regional directors and district supervisors are compensated with a fixed salary plus an incentive bonus based upon the performance of the restaurants under their supervision. Typically, our restaurants are staffed with hourly employees who are supervised by a salaried manager and two or three salaried assistant managers.

 

Training

 

We maintain a comprehensive training and development program for all of our personnel and provide both classroom and in-restaurant training for our salaried and hourly personnel. The program emphasizes system-wide operating procedures, food preparation methods and customer service standards for each of the concepts. In addition, BKC’s training and development programs are also available to us, as a franchisee.

 

Management Information Systems

 

We believe that our management information systems, which are more sophisticated than systems typically utilized by smaller Burger King franchisees and other small quick-service restaurant operators, provide us with the ability to more efficiently manage our restaurants and to ensure consistent application of operating controls throughout our three concepts. Our size also affords us the ability to maintain an in-house staff of information and restaurant systems professionals dedicated to continuously enhancing our systems. In addition, these capabilities allow us to integrate newly developed or acquired restaurants and to leverage our investments in information technology over a large base of restaurants.

 

Our restaurants generally employ touch-screen point-of-sale (POS) systems that are designed to facilitate accuracy and speed of order taking. These systems are user-friendly, require limited cashier training and improve speed-of-service through the use of conversational order-taking techniques. The POS systems are integrated with PC-based applications at the restaurant that are designed to facilitate financial and management control of our restaurant operations.

 

12


Our restaurant systems provide daily tracking and reporting of traffic counts, menu item sales, labor and food data, and other key operating information for each restaurant. We electronically communicate with our restaurants on a daily basis which enables us to collect this information for use in our corporate management systems. Our Corporate and divisional administrative headquarters house client/server-based systems that support all of our accounting, operating and reporting systems. We also operate a 24-hour, seven-day help desk at our corporate headquarters that enables us to provide systems and operational support to our restaurant operations as required. Among other things, our restaurant information systems provide us with the ability to:

 

  monitor labor utilization and sales trends on a real-time basis at each restaurant enabling the store manager to effectively manage to established labor standards on a timely basis;

 

  minimize shrinkage using restaurant-level inventory management and centralized standard costing systems;

 

  analyze sales and product mix data to help restaurant management personnel forecast production levels;

 

  monitor day-part drive-thru speed of service at each of our restaurants;

 

  systematically communicate human resource and payroll data to our administrative offices for efficient centralized management of labor costing and payroll processing;

 

  employ centralized control over price, menu and inventory management activities at the restaurant utilizing the remote access capabilities of our systems;

 

  take advantage of electronic commerce including our ability to place orders with suppliers and to integrate detailed invoice, receiving and product data with our inventory and accounting systems; and

 

  provide analyses, reporting and tools to enable all levels of management to review a wide-range of financial and operational data.

 

Information from our systems is available daily to the restaurant manager, who is expected to react quickly to trends or situations in his or her restaurant. Our district supervisors also receive daily information for all restaurants under their control and have access to key operating data on a remote basis using our corporate intranet and laptop computers. Management personnel at all levels, from the restaurant manager through senior management, monitor key restaurant performance indicators.

 

Site Selection

 

We believe that the location of our restaurants is a critical component of each restaurant’s success. We evaluate potential new sites on many critical criteria including accessibility, visibility, costs, surrounding traffic patterns, competition and demographic characteristics. Our senior management determines the acceptability of all acquisition prospects and new sites, based upon analyses prepared by our real estate and financial professionals and operations personnel.

 

13


Burger King Franchise Agreements

 

Each of our Burger King restaurants operates under a separate franchise agreement with Burger King Corporation. Our franchise agreements with BKC require, among other things, that all restaurants comply with specified design criteria and be operated in a prescribed manner, including utilization of the standard Burger King menu. Our franchise agreements with BKC generally provide for an initial term of 20 years and currently have an initial fee of $50,000. BKC may grant a successor franchise agreement (renewal) for an additional 20-year term, provided the restaurant meets the current BKC operating and image standards. The successor BKC franchise agreement fee is currently $50,000. BKC may not cancel or terminate our franchise agreements unless we are in default of the terms of the agreements. We are not in default under our franchise agreements with BKC.

 

In order to obtain a successor franchise agreement with BKC, a franchisee is typically required to make capital improvements to the restaurant to bring it up to BKC’s current design standards. The required capital improvements will vary widely depending upon the magnitude of the required changes and the degree to which we have made interim changes to the restaurant. We have three franchise agreements expiring in 2004, 24 franchise agreements expiring in 2005 and 17 franchise agreements expiring in 2006.

 

We believe that we will be able to satisfy BKC’s normal successor franchise agreement policies. Accordingly, we believe that successor franchise agreements with BKC will be granted on a timely basis by BKC at the expiration of our existing franchise agreements with BKC. Historically, BKC has granted all of our requests for successor franchise agreements. We cannot assure you, however, that BKC will continue to grant each of our requests for successor franchise agreements.

 

In addition to the initial franchise fee, we generally pay to BKC a monthly royalty of 3  1 / 2 % of the gross revenues from our Burger King restaurants. We also contribute a minimum of 4% of restaurant sales from our Burger King restaurants to fund BKC’s national and regional advertising. BKC engages in substantial national and regional advertising and promotional activities and other efforts to maintain and enhance the Burger King brand. We supplement BKC’s marketing with local advertising and promotional campaigns. See “Business—Advertising and Promotion.”

 

Our franchise agreements with BKC do not give us exclusive rights to operate Burger King restaurants in any defined territory. Although we believe that BKC generally seeks to ensure that newly granted franchises do not materially adversely affect the operations of existing Burger King restaurants, there is no assurance that a franchise given by BKC to a third party will not adversely affect any single Burger King restaurant that we operate.

 

We are required to obtain BKC’s consent before we acquire existing Burger King restaurants or develop new Burger King restaurants. BKC also has the right of first refusal to purchase any Burger King restaurant that is being offered for sale by a franchisee. To date, BKC has approved all of our acquisitions of Burger King restaurants from other franchisees, except for two instances when it exercised its right of first refusal.

 

Franchise Fees and Early Successor Program

 

On July 1, 2000, BKC increased its royalty and franchise fees for most new restaurants. The franchise fee for new restaurants increased from $40,000 to $50,000 for a 20-year agreement and the royalty rate increased from 3  1 / 2 % of sales to 4  1 / 2 % of sales, after a transitional period. For franchise agreements entered into during the transitional period, the royalty rate is 4% of sales for the first 10 years of the agreement and 4  1 / 2 % of sales for the balance of the term.

 

14


For new restaurants, the transitional period was from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2003. As of July 1, 2003, the royalty rate became 4  1 / 2 % of sales for the full term of new restaurant franchise agreements. As of July 1, 2001, existing restaurants that renewed their franchise agreements pay a royalty of 4  1 / 2 % of sales for the full term of the renewed agreement. The advertising contribution remained at 4% of sales. The royalty rates for existing franchise agreements are not affected by these changes until the time of renewal.

 

BKC offered a voluntary program to encourage franchisees to accelerate the renewal of their franchise agreements. Franchisees that elected to participate in the Early Successor Incentive Program were required to make capital improvements in their restaurants to bring them up to BKC’s current design image. Franchise agreements entered into under this program contain special provisions regarding the royalty rates including a reduction in the royalty for a period of time.

 

For commitments made prior to July 1, 2000 to renew franchise agreements under BKC’s Fiscal 2000 Early Successor Incentive Program, the renewal franchise fee remained at $40,000. The royalty rate under this program remained at 3  1 / 2 % through March 31, 2002, at which time it was reduced to 2  3 / 4 % for the following five-year period. The royalty rate reverts back to 3  1 / 2 % effective April 1, 2007 for the remainder of any of the initial franchise term, and then increases to 4  1 / 2 % for the balance of the new agreement.

 

For commitments made between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2001 to renew franchise agreements under BKC’s Fiscal 2001 Early Successor Incentive Program, the renewal franchise fee increased to $50,000. The royalty rate remained at 3  1 / 2 % through September 30, 2002, at which time it was reduced to 3% for a three-year period. The royalty rate reverts back to 3  1 / 2 % effective October 1, 2005 for the remainder of any of the initial franchise term, and then increases to 4  1 / 2 % for the balance of the new agreement.

 

After evaluating the applicable royalty reductions and the acceleration of the required capital improvements, we elected to renew 48 franchise agreements under BKC’s Early Successor Incentive Programs. Our capital expenditures related to these renewals were substantially completed in 2002. Burger King royalties, as a percentage of restaurant sales, decreased to 3.4% in 2003 and 2002 from 3.5% in 2001 and are anticipated to be 3.4% in 2004 as a result of our renewals under these programs.

 

Transformation Initiatives

 

Over the past three years BKC has instituted initiatives to encourage and facilitate franchisees’ investment in certain upgrades to their restaurants. These transformation initiatives include the installation of new signage with the new Burger King logos, a new drive-thru equipment package, and where necessary, expenditures for painting, parking lot maintenance and landscaping. In addition, BKC defined enhancements to the kitchen including a new high-speed toaster, improved product holding units and a new self-loading broiler capable of cooking at different speeds and temperatures facilitating the preparation of a wider variety of menu items. By an amendment to our franchise agreements, we have committed:

 

  to install the new signage in substantially all of our restaurants;

 

  to “spruce up” our restaurants to the extent necessary, including painting, parking lot sealing/striping, and landscaping;

 

  to install the new drive-thru package, which includes new menu boards, an order confirmation unit and an improved speaker system; and

 

  to roll-out and install the new kitchen initiatives as approved and mandated by BKC which currently include improved toasting and holding equipment (Phase I initiatives) and a new broiler (Phase II initiatives).

 

15


BKC also arranged for the Coca-Cola Company and Dr. Pepper/Seven-Up, Inc. to make funds available to franchisees to be used in connection with the transformation initiatives. By agreeing to make the investments associated with the transformation initiatives, we received $56,000 per restaurant in 2000, or approximately $19.8 million in the aggregate, from the fund established by Coca-Cola and Dr. Pepper. We also received $1.6 million from this fund on a supplemental basis in 2001 pertaining to completing the drive-thru package.

 

We had completed all of the initiatives above, with the exception of signage and the Phase II kitchen initiatives, by the end of 2002. We are substantially complete with respect to the installation of new signage as of December 31, 2003. Total expenditures related to these activities over the past four years were $12.8 million. Phase II kitchen initiatives (installation of a new broiler) have not yet been mandated by BKC.

 

Pollo Tropical Franchise Operations

 

At December 31, 2003 Pollo Tropical had three franchisees operating a total of 24 Pollo Tropical restaurants located in Puerto Rico, Ecuador and Miami. While our existing franchisees may open new restaurants from time to time, we are not actively expanding our franchise operations at the present time.

 

Our standard franchise agreement under which we franchise Pollo Tropical restaurants to independent restaurant operators has a 15-year term (with one 15-year renewal option). It provides for an initial payment by the franchisee of a portion of all franchise fees upon signing of the area development and franchise agreements, with the remainder due before the opening of the franchisee’s Pollo Tropical restaurants. The franchisee also pays a continuing royalty, based upon a specified percentage of gross sales. The terms and conditions of these franchise agreements will vary depending upon a number of factors, including:

 

  the experience and resources of the franchisee;

 

  the size and density of the development area;

 

  the number of units to be developed;

 

  the schedule for development;

 

  capital requirements; and

 

  fee and royalty arrangements.

 

All franchisees are required to operate their restaurants in compliance with certain methods, standards and specifications developed by Pollo Tropical regarding such matters as menu items, recipes, food preparation, materials, supplies, services, fixtures, furnishings, decor and signs. The franchisees have discretion to determine the prices to be charged to customers. In addition, all franchisees are required to purchase substantially all food, ingredients, supplies and materials from suppliers approved by us.

 

Taco Cabana Franchise Operations

 

As of December 31, 2003, Taco Cabana had five franchisees operating a total of nine Taco Cabana restaurants. Taco Cabana did not enter into any new franchise agreements during 2003 and we are not actively expanding our franchise operations at the present time.

 

16


Advertising and Promotion

 

The efficiency and quality of advertising and promotional programs can significantly affect quick-service restaurant businesses. We believe that one of the major advantages of being a Burger King franchisee is the value of the extensive regional and national advertising and promotional programs conducted by BKC. In addition to the benefits derived from BKC’s advertising spending, we supplement BKC’s advertising and promotional activities with local advertising and promotions, including the purchase of additional television, radio and print advertising. Our concentration of restaurants in many of our markets permits us to leverage advertising in those markets. We also utilize promotional programs, such as combination value meals and discounted prices, targeted to our customers, in order to create a flexible and directed marketing program.

 

We are generally required to contribute 4% of gross revenues from restaurant operations to an advertising fund utilized by BKC for its advertising, promotional programs and public relations activities. BKC’s advertising programs consist of national campaigns supplemented by local advertising. BKC’s advertising campaigns are generally carried on television, radio and in circulated print media (national and regional newspapers and magazines).

 

We believe that brand awareness for our Pollo Tropical restaurants is extremely high because of the concentration of our restaurants in the south Florida markets. The market concentration of Pollo Tropical restaurants allows us to maximize the effectiveness of our advertising efforts. Pollo Tropical advertises in both English and Spanish media throughout the year, including television, radio and print advertising. Pollo Tropical also has marketed at the individual restaurant level through unique promotional and public relations programs. Pollo Tropical spent approximately 3.6%, 3.6% and 3.7% of restaurant sales on advertising in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. We anticipate our 2004 Pollo Tropical advertising expenditures to be near a comparable level, as a percentage of restaurant sales.

 

Taco Cabana utilizes an integrated, multi-level marketing approach that includes periodic chain-wide promotions, direct mail, in-store promotions, local store marketing and other strategies, including the use of radio and television advertising in its major markets. Combination value meals are also utilized as well as limited time offer menu item promotions. As a percentage of restaurant sales, Taco Cabana’s advertising expenditures were approximately 4.7% in 2003, 4.3% in 2002 and 5.1% in 2001. Advertising expenditures, as a percentage of restaurant sales, increased in 2003 from fiscal 2002 levels, as a percentage of restaurant sales, due to additional promotions in certain markets. We anticipate our Taco Cabana advertising expenditures to range from 4.3% to 4.5% of restaurant sales in 2004.

 

Supplies and Distribution

 

We are a member of a national purchasing cooperative created for the Burger King system known as Restaurant Services, Inc. Restaurant Services Inc. is a non-profit independent cooperative that acts as the purchasing agent for approved distributors to the Burger King system and serves to negotiate the lowest cost for the system. We use our purchasing power to negotiate directly with certain other vendors, to obtain favorable pricing and terms for supplying our restaurants.

 

17


For our Burger King restaurants, we are required to purchase all of our foodstuffs, paper goods and packaging materials from BKC-approved suppliers. We currently utilize four suppliers to supply our Burger King restaurants with the majority of their foodstuffs in various geographical areas. We may purchase non-food items such as kitchen utensils, equipment maintenance tools and other supplies from any suitable source provided that such items meet BKC product uniformity standards. All BKC-approved suppliers are required to purchase foodstuffs and supplies from BKC-approved manufacturers and purveyors. BKC is responsible for monitoring quality control and supervision of these manufacturers and conducts regular visits to observe the preparation of foodstuffs, and to run various tests to ensure that only high quality foodstuffs are sold to BKC-approved suppliers. In addition, BKC coordinates and supervises audits of approved suppliers and distributors to determine continuing product specification compliance and to ensure that manufacturing plant and distribution center standards are met.

 

For our Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana restaurants, we have negotiated directly with local and national suppliers for the purchase of food and beverage products and supplies to ensure consistent quality and freshness and to obtain competitive prices. Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana restaurants’ food and supplies are ordered from approved suppliers and are shipped directly to the restaurants. Both brands are responsible for monitoring quality control and supervision of these suppliers and conduct inspections to observe the preparation and quality of products purchased. For our Taco Cabana restaurants, SYGMA Network, Inc. (SYGMA) serves as the primary distributor of food and beverage products and supplies. SYGMA purchases, warehouses and distributes products for these restaurants under a distribution service agreement that expires on December 31, 2005. For our Pollo Tropical restaurants, Henry Lee, a division of Gordon Food Service, serves as the primary distributor of food and paper products under an agreement which expires on March 16, 2007.

 

If a significant disruption in service or supply by any of our suppliers were to occur, it could create disruptions in the operations of our restaurants, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

 

Quality Assurance

 

At each of our three concepts we focus our operations on achieving a high level of customer satisfaction with speed, order accuracy and quality of service that is closely monitored. Our senior management and restaurant management staffs are principally responsible for ensuring compliance with our operating policies, and with respect to our Burger King restaurants, BKC’s required operating procedures as well. We have uniform operating standards and specifications relating to the quality, preparation and selection of menu items, maintenance and cleanliness of the premises and employee conduct. In order to help maintain compliance with these operating standards and specifications, we distribute to our restaurant operations management team detailed reports measuring compliance with various customer service standards and objectives.

 

We also operate in accordance with quality assurance and health standards set by Federal, state and local governmental laws and regulations. These standards include food preparation rules regarding, among other things, minimum cooking times and temperatures, maximum time standards for holding prepared food, food handling guidelines and cleanliness. To maintain these standards, we conduct unscheduled inspections of our restaurants. In addition, restaurant managers conduct internal inspections for taste, quality, cleanliness and food safety on a regular basis.

 

18


Trademarks

 

We have registered our principal Taco Cabana logo and design with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on the Principal Register as a service mark for our restaurant services. We also have secured or have applied for state and Federal registrations of several other advertising or promotional marks, including variations of our principal mark, and have applied for registrations in foreign countries of our principal mark and several other marks.

 

We have registered our principal trademarks for “Pollo Tropical ® ,” “TropiGrill ® ” and “TropiChops ® ” in the United States and presently have applications pending or registrations granted in various foreign countries in which we conduct business or may conduct business through our franchise system. In certain foreign countries, we have been involved in trademark opposition proceedings to defend our rights to register certain trademarks. We intend to protect both Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical trademarks by appropriate legal action whenever necessary.

 

Other than the Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana trademarks, we have no proprietary intellectual property other than the logo and trademark of Carrols Corporation. As a franchisee of Burger King, we also have contractual rights to use certain BKC-owned trademarks, servicemarks and other intellectual property relating to the Burger King concept.

 

Government Regulation

 

Various Federal, state and local laws affect our business, including various health, sanitation, fire and safety standards. Restaurants to be constructed or remodeled are subject to state and local building code and zoning requirements. In connection with the construction and remodeling of our restaurants, we may incur costs to meet certain Federal, state and local regulations, including regulations promulgated under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

 

We are subject to the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act and various state laws governing such matters as:

 

  minimum wage requirements;

 

  overtime; and

 

  other working conditions and citizenship requirements.

 

A significant number of our food service personnel are paid at rates related to the Federal minimum wage and, accordingly, increases in the minimum wage have increased wage rates at our restaurants in the past.

 

We are also subject to various Federal, state and local environmental laws, rules and regulations. We believe that we conduct our operations in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. None of the applicable environmental laws or regulations has had a material adverse effect on our operations or financial condition.

 

Taco Cabana is subject to state “dram-shop” laws in the states in which it operates. Dram-shop laws provide a person injured by an intoxicated person the right to recover damages from an establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to the intoxicated person. We have specific insurance that covers claims arising under dram-shop laws.

 

19


With respect to the franchising of Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana restaurants, we are subject to franchise and related regulations in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions where we offer and sell franchises. These regulations include obligations to provide disclosure about our two concepts, the franchise agreements and the franchise system. The regulations also include obligations to register certain franchise documents in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, and obligations to disclose the substantive relationship between the parties to the agreements.

 

Competition

 

The quick-service and quick-casual restaurant industry segments are highly competitive with respect to price, service, location and food quality. In each of our markets, our restaurants compete with a large number of national and regional restaurant chains, as well as locally owned restaurants, offering low and medium-priced fare. Convenience stores, delicatessens and food counters in grocery stores, cafeterias and other purveyors of moderately priced and quickly prepared foods also compete with us.

 

We believe that:

 

  product quality and taste;

 

  brand recognition;

 

  convenience of location;

 

  speed of service;

 

  menu variety;

 

  price; and

 

  ambiance

 

are the most important competitive factors in the quick-service and quick-casual restaurant industry segments and that our three concepts effectively compete in each category.

 

With respect to our Burger King restaurants, which are part of the quick-service hamburger segment, our largest competitors are McDonald’s and Wendy’s. According to publicly available information, as of December 31, 2003, McDonald’s U.S. operations comprised approximately 13,700 restaurants and had U.S. systemwide sales for the year ended December 31, 2003 of approximately $22.1 billion. As of December 31, 2002, Wendy’s U.S. operations comprised 5,549 restaurants and had total U.S. systemwide sales for the year ended December 31, 2002 of $7.0 billion.

 

In addition to quick-service hamburger restaurant chains as well as other types of quick-service and quick-casual restaurants, Pollo Tropical’s competitors include national and regional chicken-based concepts, such as Boston Market and KFC, and regional grilled chicken concepts.

 

Taco Cabana’s restaurants compete both with quick-service operators, including those in the quick-serve Mexican segment such as Taco Bell, and traditional casual dining Mexican restaurants. We believe that Taco Cabana’s combination of freshly prepared food, distinctive ambiance and superior service help to distinguish Taco Cabana restaurants from quick-service operators, while Taco Cabana’s price-value relationship enables it to compete favorably with more expensive casual dining Mexican restaurants.

 

20


Employees

 

At December 31, 2003, we employed approximately 15,900 persons of whom approximately 400 were administrative personnel and 15,500 were restaurant operating personnel. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

 

At December 31, 2003 we owned or leased the following restaurant properties:

 

    

Owned

Land;

Owned

Building


  

Leased

Land;

Owned

Building


  

Leased

Land;

Leased

Building(a)


   Total

Restaurants—operating

   25    65    442    532

Restaurants under construction

   1    2    —      3

Excess properties:

                   

Leased to others

   —      —      3    3

Available for sale or lease

   2    2    —      4
    
  
  
  

Total restaurant properties

   28    69    445    542
    
  
  
  

(a) Includes 15 restaurants located in mall shopping centers.

 

As of December 31, 2003 we leased 95% of our Burger King restaurant locations, all of our Pollo Tropical restaurant locations and 94% of our Taco Cabana restaurant locations. We typically enter into leases (including options to renew) from 20 to 40 years. The average remaining term for all leases, excluding options, is approximately 20 years. Generally, we have been able to renew leases, upon or prior to their expiration, at the prevailing market rates.

 

Most of our Burger King restaurant leases are coterminous with the related franchise agreements. We believe that we generally will be able to renew, at commercially reasonable rates, the leases whose terms expire prior to the expiration of that location’s Burger King franchise agreement.

 

Most leases require us, as lessee, to pay utility and water charges and real estate taxes. Certain leases also require contingent rentals based upon a percentage of gross sales that exceed specified minimums. In some of our mall locations, we are also required to pay certain other charges such as a pro rata share of the mall’s common area maintenance costs, insurance and security costs.

 

In addition to the restaurant locations set forth under “Business-Restaurant Locations,” we own a building with approximately 25,300 square feet at 968 James Street, Syracuse, New York, which houses our executive offices and most of our administrative operations for our Burger King restaurants. We lease five small regional offices that support the management of our Burger King restaurants. We also lease 13,449 square feet at 7300 North Kendall Drive, 8th Floor, Miami, Florida, which houses most of our administrative operations for our Pollo Tropical restaurants. In addition, we lease approximately 17,700 square feet of office space at 8918 Tesoro Drive, Suite 200, San Antonio, Texas, which houses most of our administrative operations for our Taco Cabana restaurants.

 

21


ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

On November 16, 1998, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (the “Court”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, against the Company. The complaint alleges that the Company has engaged in a pattern and practice of unlawful discrimination, harassment and retaliation against former and current female employees of the Company over the course of many years. At present, the EEOC has identified approximately 450 individuals it believes represent the class of claimants. The EEOC is seeking monetary and injunctive relief from the Company.

 

On January 15, 2004, we filed a renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”). The Court held oral argument on the Motion on March 12, 2004 and has taken the Motion under submission. It is not possible to predict whether we will prevail on the Motion, which subject to possible appeals by the EEOC would effectively end the case. If we do not prevail on the Motion, the case will proceed to trial. It is too early to make an evaluation of the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or estimate of the amount or range of potential loss. Consequently, it is not possible to predict what adverse impact, if any, this case could have on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows. We intend to continue to contest the case vigorously and believe it is without merit.

 

We are a party to various other litigation matters incidental to the conduct of our business. We do not believe that the outcome of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.

 

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

None

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

There is no established trading market for our capital stock. Carrols Holdings owns 10 shares of our common stock (representing 100% of our capital stock).

 

There were no cash dividends paid during fiscal 2003 and 2002. We have no present intention to declare or pay any cash dividends on shares in the foreseeable future. Certain restrictive covenants contained in agreements governing our long-term indebtedness currently limit our ability to make dividend payments and certain other payments.

 

22


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

We have restated our financial statements including applicable footnotes for periods ended prior to December 31, 2003 to report real estate transactions for 86 restaurants consummated during 1991 to 2000 as financing transactions under SFAS No. 98 “Accounting for Leases” rather than as sale/leaseback transactions as previously reported. The impact of the restatement is to record on our balance sheets the property and equipment of the restaurants subject to these transactions and record the proceeds from these transactions, (including the gains previously deferred) as a form of debt financing. The restatement also impacted our operating results by increasing the depreciation expense for the property and equipment subject to these transactions and recharacterizing the lease payments previously reported as rent expense for these restaurants as principal repayments and interest expense. There was no impact on sale/leaseback transactions that were consummated in 2002 and 2003.

 

As a result of the restatement, we were in default related to certain required financial leverage ratios and other covenants under our senior secured credit facility. We have obtained a waiver from our senior secured lenders of any prior non-compliance and defaults resulting from the restatement. In addition, our senior secured credit facility has been amended to exclude all adjustments resulting from this restatement on our financial covenant requirements and to treat on a prospective basis the specified leases as if no restatement or recharacterization has occurred.

 

The restatement discussed above was due to lease provisions in certain of our sale/leaseback transactions, which in our opinion have minimal commercial impact upon the relevant terms of the lease. We may amend these leases in the future to address these provisions and to qualify them for treatment as operating leases as originally intended. However, no such assurances can be made as to when or whether any or all of such leases will be amended.

 

The following summary of selected financial information has been revised to reflect this restatement. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the restatement adjustments for the years ended 2001 and 2002.

 

Our acquisition of Taco Cabana was completed in December 2000 and, as a result, our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000 include the results of operations for Taco Cabana since December 20, 2000. The following restated selected financial information should be read in conjunction with our restated Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 in Item 15 and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7.

 

     Year Ended December 31,

     Restated
1999(1)


    Restated
2000(1)


    Restated
2001


    Restated
2002


   2003

     (Dollars in thousands)

Statement of Operations Data:

                                     

Restaurant sales

   $ 455,440     $ 465,862     $ 654,710     $ 655,545    $ 643,579

Franchise royalty revenues and fees

     1,039       1,039       1,579       1,482      1,406
    


 


 


 

  

Total revenues

     456,479       466,901       656,289       657,027      644,985

Costs and expenses:

                                     

Cost of sales

     137,279       132,646       189,947       183,976      181,182

Restaurant wages and related expenses

     134,125       135,787       192,918       196,258      194,315

Restaurant rent expense

     24,267       24,187       31,207       30,494      31,383

Other restaurant operating expenses

     59,716       61,500       86,435       87,335      89,880

Advertising expense

     20,618       20,554       28,830       28,041      27,351

General and administrative

     23,102       26,403       35,393       36,610      37,123

Depreciation and amortization

     26,499       31,815       47,966       44,051      47,253

Other expense (income) (2)

     —         (1,365 )     8,841       —        —  
    


 


 


 

  

Total operating expenses

     425,606       431,527       621,537       606,765      608,487
    


 


 


 

  

Income from operations

     30,873       35,374       34,752       50,262      36,498

Interest expense

     26,844       28,696       40,552       34,955      32,363

Loss on extinguishment of debt

     1,825       575       —         —        —  
    


 


 


 

  

Income (loss) before income taxes

     2,204       6,103       (5,800 )     15,307      4,135

Provision for income taxes

     2,342       3,407       274       5,593      1,767
    


 


 


 

  

Net income (loss)

   $ (138 )   $ 2,696     $ (6,074 )   $ 9,714    $ 2,368
    


 


 


 

  

 

23


     Year Ended December 31,

 
     Restated
1999(1)


    Restated
2000(1)


    Restated
2001


    Restated
2002


    2003

 
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Balance Sheet Data (At Period End):

                                        

Total assets

   $ 373,978     $ 558,971     $ 552,111     $ 547,388     $ 486,874  

Working capital deficiency

     (22,835 )     (24,476 )     (34,967 )     (34,975 )     (40,857 )
                                          

Senior and senior subordinated debt

     251,100       365,600       368,500       357,300       294,100  

Capital leases and other debt

     2,394       5,538       5,144       3,045       1,732  

Financing obligations

     60,887       90,004       88,471       86,702       84,685  
    


 


 


 


 


Total debt

     314,381       461,142       462,115       447,047       380,517  

Stockholder’s equity

     12,266       14,962       8,888       18,602       20,970  

Other Financial Data:

                                        

EBITDA (3)

   $ 57,372     $ 65,824     $ 89,771     $ 94,313     $ 83,751  

Adjusted EBITDA (4)

     57,372       65,824       91,559       94,313       83,751  

Adjusted EBITDA margin

     12.6 %     14.1 %     14.0 %     14.4 %     13.0 %

Cash provided from operating activities

   $ 39,076     $ 50,862     $ 47,968     $ 55,965     $ 48,239  

Cash used for investing activities

     (48,935 )     (190,818 )     (49,156 )     (55,071 )     (29,472 )

Cash provided from (used for) financing activities

     4,983       140,767       881       (761 )     (18,891 )

Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions

     45,332       36,157       47,575       54,155       30,244  

Operating Statistics:

                                        

Total number of restaurants

     397       521       532       529       532  

Burger King:

                                        

Number of restaurants (at end of period)

     352       355       359       355       351  

Average number of restaurants

     344.3       352.1       353.3       355.6       352.2  

Average annual sales per restaurant

   $ 1,082     $ 1,055     $ 1,078     $ 1,069     $ 1,003  

Percentage change in comparable restaurant sales (5)

     (2.5 )%     (2.5 )%     1.3 %     (1.3 )%     (7.2 )%

Pollo Tropical:

                                        

Number of restaurants (at end of period)

     45       49       53       58       60  

Average number of restaurants

     41.8       45.6       50.4       55.6       59.4  

Average annual sales per restaurant

   $ 1,980     $ 1,951     $ 1,913     $ 1,807     $ 1,838  

Percentage change in comparable restaurant sales (5)

     0.7 %     1.7 %     (0.3 )%     (4.2 )%     2.3 %

Taco Cabana (6):

                                        

Number of restaurants (at end of period)

     109       117       120       116       121  

Average number of restaurants

     106.0       112.8       120.3       114.6       118.9  

Average annual sales per restaurant

   $ 1,487     $ 1,510     $ 1,475     $ 1,527     $ 1,523  

Percentage change in comparable restaurant sales (5)

     5.5 %     3.4 %     1.6 %     (0.2 )%     (3.0 )%

(1) The restatement adjustments affecting fiscal years 1999, 2000 and the balance sheet and other financial data for 2001 are set forth in the following table (in thousands):

 

     Year ended December 31,

 
     1999

    2000

    2001

 
     As
Previously
Reported


    As
Restated


    As
Previously
Reported


    As
Restated


    As
Reported


    As
Restated


 

Statement of Operations Data:

                                                

Restaurant rent expense

   $ 29,377     $ 24,267     $ 30,095     $ 24,187                  

Depreciation and amortization

     23,898       26,499       28,856       31,815                  

Total operating expenses

     428,115       425,606       434,476       431,527                  

Income from operations

     28,364       30,873       32,425       35,374                  

Interest expense

     22,386       26,844       23,666       28,696                  

Income before income taxes

     4,153       2,204       8,184       6,103                  

Provision for income taxes

     3,100       2,342       4,216       3,407                  

Net income (loss)

     1,053       (138 )     3,968       2,696                  

Balance Sheet Data:

                                                

Total assets

   $ 320,027     $ 373,978     $ 476,912     $ 558,971     $ 473,434     $ 552,111  

Working capital deficiency

     (21,696 )     (22,835 )     (25,943 )     (24,476 )     (33,198 )     (34,967 )

Financing obligations

     —         60,887       —         90,004       —         88,471  

Total debt

     253,494       314,381       371,138       461,142       373,644       462,115  

Stockholder's equity

     15,051       12,266       19,019       14,962       15,055       8,888  

Other Financial Data:

                                                

EBITDA

   $ 52,262     $ 57,372     $ 59,916     $ 65,824     $ 80,936     $ 89,771  

Adjusted EBITDA

     52,262       57,372       59,916       65,824       82,724       91,559  

Adjusted EBITDA margin

     11.4 %     12.6 %     12.8 %     14.1 %     12.6 %     14.0 %

Cash provided from operating activities

   $ 38,173     $ 39,076     $ 49,720     $ 50,862     $ 46,435     $ 47,968  

Cash provided from financing activities

     5,886       4,983       141,919       140,767       2,414       881  

 

The restatement adjustments affecting fiscal years 1999, 2000 and 2001 are to record on our balance sheets the property and equipment of the restaurants subject to these transactions and record the proceeds from these transactions, (including the gains previously deferred) as a form of debt financing. The restatement also impacted our operating results by increasing the depreciation expense for the property and equipment subject to these transactions and recharacterizing the lease payments previously reported as rent expense for these restaurants as principal repayments and interest expense. The cumulative effect of these adjustments affecting periods prior to fiscal 1999 are reflected as an increase of $1,594 to our accumulated deficit at December 31, 1998.

 

(2) Other income in 2000 was from the recognition of previously deferred contractual payments received from Ameriserve Food Distribution, Inc., which were recognized upon termination of the related supply agreement in 2000. Other expense in 2001 resulted from the closure of seven Taco Cabana restaurants in the Phoenix, Arizona market and the discontinuance of restaurant development in that market. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15.

 

(3) EBITDA is defined as income before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, loss on extinguishment of debt and non-cash other income and expense. EBITDA is presented because we believe it is a useful financial indicator for measuring a company’s ability to service and/or incur indebtedness. However, EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income as a measure of operating results or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

 

(4) Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA plus other expense of $1,788,000 in 2001 related to the closure of seven Taco Cabana restaurants. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on page 32.

 

(5) The percentage change in comparable restaurant sales is calculated using only those restaurants that have been open since the beginning of the earliest period being compared. (12 months in the case of Burger King and 18 months for Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana.)

 

(6) Taco Cabana was acquired in December 2000. Average restaurants, average sales and comparable sales data for periods prior to the respective acquisition are presented for informational purposes only.

 

24


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

 

Restatement

 

The Company has restated its financial statements including applicable footnotes for periods ended prior to December 31, 2003 to report real estate transactions for 86 restaurants consummated during 1991 to 2000 as financing transactions under SFAS No. 98 “Accounting for Leases” rather than as sale/leaseback transactions as previously reported. The impact of the restatement is to record on our balance sheets the property and equipment of the restaurants subject to these transactions and record the proceeds from these transactions, (including the gains previously deferred) as a form of debt financing. The restatement also impacted our operating results by increasing the depreciation expense for the property and equipment subject to these transactions and recharacterizing the lease payments previously reported as rent expense for these restaurants as principal repayments and interest expense. There was no impact on sale/leaseback transactions that were consummated in 2002 and 2003.

 

As a result of the restatement, we were in default related to certain required financial leverage ratios and other covenants under our senior secured credit facility. We have obtained a waiver from our senior secured lenders of any prior non-compliance and defaults resulting from the restatement. In addition, our senior secured credit facility has been amended to exclude all adjustments resulting from this restatement on our financial covenant requirements and to treat on a prospective basis the specified leases as if no restatement or recharacterization has occurred.

 

The restatement discussed above was due to lease provisions in certain of our sale/leaseback transactions, which in our opinion have minimal commercial impact upon the relevant terms of the lease. We may amend these leases in the future to address these provisions and to qualify them for treatment as operating leases as originally intended. However, no assurances can be made as to when or whether any or all of such leases will be amended.

 

See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a complete discussion of the restatement. All previously reported amounts that appear in our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation below have also been restated to report the revised amounts.

 

Overview

 

We are one of the largest restaurant companies in the U.S. operating 532 restaurants in 16 states as of December 31, 2003. We operate three restaurant concepts that provide balance in terms of our revenues and diversification with regard to restaurant concept as well as the geographic location of our restaurants. We are the largest Burger King ® franchisee in the world and have operated Burger King restaurants since 1976. We also own and operate two regional Hispanic restaurant companies: Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical. At December 31, 2003, we operated 351 Burger King restaurants located in 13 Northeastern, Midwestern and Southeastern states. Our Burger King restaurant sales were $353.3 million in 2003, or 55% of our total revenues. Our Hispanic restaurant brands collectively operate or franchise more than 200 restaurants and comprised 45% of our 2003 total revenues.

 

In 1998 we acquired Pollo Tropical Inc., a restaurant chain featuring grilled marinated chicken and authentic “made from scratch” side dishes, for a cash purchase price of approximately $95 million. Since the acquisition, we have expanded this concept by over 65% by opening 24 new Pollo Tropical restaurants. At December 31, 2003, we operated 60 company owned Pollo Tropical restaurants in Florida and franchised 24 Pollo Tropical restaurants, 19 of which are in Puerto Rico. Total Pollo Tropical revenues from company-operated restaurants were $109.2 million in 2003.

 

In December 2000 we acquired Taco Cabana Inc., a restaurant chain featuring Mexican style food including flame-grilled beef and chicken fajitas, quesadillas, and fresh flour tortillas, for a total purchase price of approximately $155 million. At December 31, 2003 we operated 121 company owned Taco Cabana restaurants located in Texas and Oklahoma and franchised nine Taco Cabana restaurants. Since the acquisition we have opened 21 new Taco Cabana restaurants and have closed 15 restaurants, including seven restaurants in the Phoenix, Arizona market. Total Taco Cabana revenues from company-operated restaurants were $181.1 million in 2003.

 

We use a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to December 31. All references herein to the fiscal years ended December 30, 2001, December 29, 2002 and December 28, 2003 will be referred to as the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. The fiscal years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 each contain 52 weeks.

 

Significant Accounting Policies

 

Financial Reporting Release No. 60 requires all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements. Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K, includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The following is a brief discussion of the more significant accounting policies and methods used by the Company.

 

25


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make assumptions and estimates that can have a material impact on our results of operations. Sales recognition at company-operated restaurants is straightforward as customers pay for products at the time of sale and inventory turns over very quickly. Payments to vendors for products sold in the restaurants are generally settled within 30 days. The earnings reporting process is covered by our system of internal controls, and generally does not require significant management estimates and judgments. However, estimates and judgments are inherent in the assessment and recording of accrued occupancy costs, insurance liabilities, legal obligations, income taxes and the valuation of goodwill for impairment. While we apply our judgment based on assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, actual results could vary from these assumptions. It is possible that materially different amounts would be reported using different assumptions.

 

We make estimates of accrued occupancy costs pertaining to closed restaurant locations on an ongoing basis. These estimates require assessment and continuous evaluation of a number of factors such as the remaining contractual period under our lease obligations, the amount of sublease income, if any, we are able to realize on a particular property and estimates of other costs such as property taxes. Differences between actual future events and prior estimates could result in adjustments to these accrued costs.

 

We are self-insured for most workers’ compensation, general liability and medical insurance claims. We record insurance liabilities based on historical and industry trends, which are continually monitored, and adjust accruals as warranted by changing circumstances. Since there are many estimates and assumptions involved in recording these insurance liabilities, differences between actual future events and prior estimates and assumptions could result in adjustments to these liabilities.

 

In the normal course of business, we must make estimates of potential future legal obligations and liabilities, which require the use of management’s judgment. Management may also use outside legal advice to assist in the estimating process. However, the ultimate outcome of various legal issues could be different than management estimates and adjustments to income could be required.

 

We record income tax liabilities utilizing known obligations and estimates of potential obligations. We are required to record a valuation allowance if the value of estimated deferred tax assets are different from those recorded. This would include making estimates and judgments on future taxable income, the consideration of feasible tax planning strategies and existing facts and circumstances. When the amount of deferred tax assets to be realized is different from that recorded, the asset balance and income statement would reflect the change in the period such determination is made.

 

We must evaluate our recorded intangible assets for impairment under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, on an ongoing basis. We have elected to conduct our annual impairment review of goodwill and other intangible assets at December 31. Our review at December 31, 2003 indicated there has been no impairment as of that date. This annual evaluation requires us to make estimates and assumptions regarding the fair value of our reporting units. These estimates may differ from actual future events.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” This new standard, effective for 2003, requires entities to recognize the fair value of an asset retirement obligation in the period that it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The adoption of SFAS 143 has had no material impact on our financial statements.

 

26


In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” which nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” The provisions of SFAS 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. Previously issued financial statements cannot be restated under SFAS 146.

 

We have adopted FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others”, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34 (“FIN 45”). FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under guarantees issued. FIN 45 also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken. The initial recognition and measurement provisions were applicable to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45 has had no material impact on our financial statements.

 

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51 (“FIN 46”). FIN 46 is intended to clarify the application of the majority voting interest requirement of ARB No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements”, to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The controlling financial interest may be achieved through arrangements that do not involve voting interests. A company that holds variable interests in an entity will need to consolidate the variable interest entity (“VIE”) if the company’s interest in the VIE is such that the company will absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses and/or receive a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, if they occur. FIN 46 also requires additional disclosures by primary beneficiaries and other significant variable interest holders. FIN 46 may be applied prospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date on which it is first applied or by restating previously issued financial statements for one or more years with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the first year restated. FIN 46 is effective immediately to a VIE created or obtained after January 31, 2003. FIN 46, as amended, became effective for variable interests in a VIE created before February 1, 2003 at December 31, 2003.

 

FIN 46 has been subsequently modified, clarified and replaced by the issuance of FIN 46R on December 23, 2003. Relative to FIN 46, FIN 46R a) essentially excludes operating businesses from its provisions subject to four conditions, b) states the provisions of FIN 46R are not required to be applied if a company is unable, subject to making an exhaustive effort, to obtain the necessary information, c) includes new definitions and examples of what variable interests are, d) clarifies and changes the definition of a variable interest entity, and e) clarifies and changes the definition and treatment of de facto agents, as that term is defined in FIN 46 and FIN 46R. FIN 46R was issued December 23, 2003 and, for the Company, is effective no later than the end of the first quarter of 2005. The Company is currently reviewing the new provisions of FIN 46R.

 

In December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS 132R, a revision of SFAS 132, Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, an amendment of FASB Statements 87, 88 and 106. SFAS 132R revises employers’ disclosures about pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans. It does not change the measurement or recognition of obligations for those plans. SFAS 132R requires additional separate disclosures about the assets, obligations, cash flows and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans. The new disclosures are required for our 2003 fiscal year. The expanded disclosures are required on an interim basis as well and will be first required in our first quarter 2004 interim financial statements.

 

27


Results of Operations

 

The following table sets forth, for fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001, selected restated operating results of Carrols as a percentage of total restaurant sales:

 

     Year Ended December 31,

 
     2003

   

Restated

2002


   

Restated

2001


 

Restaurant sales:

                  

Burger King

   54.9 %   58.0 %   60.5 %

Pollo Tropical

   17.0 %   15.3 %   13.9 %

Taco Cabana

   28.1 %   26.7 %   25.6 %
    

 

 

Total restaurant sales

   100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %

Costs and expenses:

                  

Cost of sales

   28.2 %   28.1 %   29.0 %

Restaurant wages and related expenses

   30.2 %   29.9 %   29.5 %

Restaurant rent expense

   4.9 %   4.7 %   4.8 %

Other restaurant expenses including advertising

   18.2 %   17.6 %   17.6 %

General and administrative

   5.8 %   5.6 %   5.4 %

Depreciation and amortization

   7.3 %   6.7 %   7.3 %

Other expense

   —       —       1.4 %
    

 

 

Income from restaurant operations

   5.5 %   7.4 %   5.1 %
    

 

 

 

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002

 

In 2003 we opened two new Burger King restaurants, two new Pollo Tropical restaurants and eight new Taco Cabana restaurants. We also closed six Burger King restaurants, including one location where we sold the restaurant property, and closed three Taco Cabana restaurants, including one restaurant temporarily closed due to a fire.

 

Restaurant Sales - Total restaurant sales for 2003 decreased 1.8% to $643.6 million from $655.6 million in 2002. Burger King restaurant sales decreased 7.1% to $353.3 million in 2003 from $380.1 million in 2002 due to a sales decline at our comparable Burger King restaurants of 7.2% for 2003. This decline in Burger King restaurant sales was due primarily to competitive conditions within the industry combined with unsuccessful system-wide marketing and new product initiatives in 2003. Pollo Tropical restaurant sales increased $8.8 million, or 8.7%, to $109.2 million in 2003 due primarily to the opening of seven new restaurants since the beginning of 2002 and a sales increase of 2.3% at our comparable Pollo Tropical restaurants in 2003. Taco Cabana restaurant sales increased 3.5% to $181.1 million in 2003 from $175.0 million in 2002 due to the opening of fourteen restaurants since the beginning of 2002 partially offset by a sales decrease at our comparable Taco Cabana restaurants of 3.0% in 2003 and the closure of three Taco Cabana restaurants in 2003.

 

28


Operating Costs and Expenses - Cost of sales (food and paper costs), as a percentage of total restaurant sales, increased slightly to 28.2% in 2003 from 28.1% in 2002. Burger King cost of sales, as a percentage of Burger King restaurant sales, decreased slightly to 26.7% in 2003 from 26.8% in 2002 due to higher vendor rebates, improvements in restaurant food cost controls and the effects of modest menu price increases in the fourth quarter of 2002, partially offset by higher beef commodity prices in the fourth quarter of 2003. Pollo Tropical cost of sales, as a percentage of Pollo Tropical restaurant sales, decreased to 30.5% in 2003 from 30.7% in 2002 due to lower chicken commodity prices in 2003, higher vendor rebates and improvements in restaurant food cost controls, partially offset by lower gross margins on new menu items introduced during the last eighteen months. Taco Cabana cost of sales, as a percentage of Taco Cabana restaurant sales, increased to 29.6% in 2003 from 29.3% in 2002 due to higher cheese commodity prices and lower gross margins on 2003 promotional menu items, partially offset by lower beef commodity prices in 2003 contracted in the first quarter of 2003.

 

Restaurant wages and related expenses, as a percentage of total restaurant sales, increased to 30.2% in 2003 from 29.9% in 2002. Burger King restaurant wages and related expenses, as a percentage of Burger King restaurant sales, increased to 32.3% in 2003 from 31.2% in 2002 due to the effect of lower restaurant sales volumes on fixed labor costs and higher medical and workers compensation costs partially offset by restaurant productive labor efficiencies. Pollo Tropical restaurant wages and related expenses, as a percentage of Pollo Tropical restaurant sales, decreased to 25.7% in 2003 from 26.4% in 2002 due to restaurant productive labor efficiencies in the second half of 2003 and the effect of comparable restaurant sales increases on fixed labor costs, offset in part by higher medical insurance costs. Taco Cabana restaurant wages and related expenses, as a percentage of Taco Cabana restaurant sales, decreased slightly to 29.0% in 2003 from 29.1% in 2002 due to restaurant labor efficiencies in 2003 and reductions in restaurant productive labor rates substantially offset by the effect of lower comparable restaurant sales volumes on fixed labor costs.

 

Other restaurant operating expenses (which includes advertising), as a percentage of total restaurant sales, increased to 18.2% in 2003 from 17.6% in 2002. Burger King other restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of Burger King restaurant sales, increased to 19.1% in 2003 from 18.7% in 2002 due to higher utility costs from increases in natural gas prices and the effect of lower comparable restaurant sales volumes on fixed costs. These factors were partially offset by lower discretionary restaurant operating expenditures. Pollo Tropical other restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of Pollo Tropical restaurant sales, increased to 15.5% in 2003 from 14.7% in 2002 due primarily to higher utility costs. Taco Cabana other restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of Taco Cabana restaurant sales, increased to 18.3% in 2003 from 16.7% in 2002 due primarily to higher utility costs and higher advertising costs.

 

Restaurant rent expense, as a percentage of total restaurant sales, increased to 4.9% in 2003 from 4.7% in 2002 due to an increase in the number of new Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana restaurants opened in 2002 and 2003 utilizing leased properties.

 

General and administrative expenses increased $0.5 million to $37.1 million in 2003 from $36.6 million in 2002. As a percentage of total restaurant sales, general and administrative expenses increased to 5.8% in 2003 from 5.6% in 2002.

 

Adjusted EBITDA - Earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, loss on extinguishment of debt and other income and expense (“Adjusted EBITDA”) decreased to $83.8 million in 2003 from $94.3 million in 2002. As a percentage of total revenues, Adjusted EBITDA margins decreased to 13.0% in 2003 from 14.4% in 2002 as a result of the factors discussed above. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on page 32.

 

29


Depreciation and Amortization - Depreciation and amortization increased $3.2 million in 2003 from 2002 due primarily to impairment charges of $.7 million related to property and equipment for certain of our Burger King restaurants and impairment charges of $3.4 million related to property and equipment for certain of our Taco Cabana restaurants.

 

Interest Expense - Interest expense decreased $2.6 million to $32.4 million in 2003 from $35.0 million in 2002 due primarily to lower average debt balances in 2003, resulting primarily from the use of the net proceeds from our sale/leaseback transactions in 2003 to reduce debt under our senior credit facility and, to a much lesser extent, lower effective interest rates on our floating rate debt. The average effective interest rate on all debt was 7.2% for 2003 compared to 7.3% in 2002.

 

Income Taxes - The provision for income taxes for 2003 was derived using an estimated effective income tax rate for 2003 of 42.7%. This rate is higher than the Federal statutory tax rate of 34% due primarily to state franchise taxes, foreign taxes and non-deductible amortization of certain franchise rights.

 

Net Income - As a result of the foregoing, net income was $2.4 million in 2003 compared to $9.7 million in 2002.

 

Fiscal 2002 Compared to Fiscal 2001

 

In 2002 we opened ten new Burger King restaurants, five new Pollo Tropical restaurants and six new Taco Cabana restaurants. We also closed 14 Burger King restaurants, including five restaurants that were relocated to new locations, and ten underperforming Taco Cabana restaurants, six of which were in the Phoenix, Arizona market.

 

Restaurant Sales - Total revenues increased to $657.0 million in 2002 from $656.3 million in 2001; total restaurant sales for 2002 were $655.5 million compared to $654.7 million in 2001. Burger King restaurant sales decreased slightly to $380.1 million in 2002 from $380.9 million in 2001 due to a sales decrease at our comparable Burger King restaurants of 1.3%. Pollo Tropical restaurant sales increased $4.0 million, or 4.2%, to $100.4 million in 2002 due to the opening of nine additional restaurants in 2002 and 2001. Sales at our comparable Pollo Tropical restaurants in 2002, however, declined 4.2% due primarily to the economic effects of reduced tourism in our Florida markets since the September 11 attacks. Taco Cabana restaurant sales decreased to $175.0 million in 2002 from $177.4 million in 2001 due to the closing of our Phoenix, Arizona restaurants. Sales at our comparable Taco Cabana restaurants decreased 0.2% in 2002.

 

Operating Costs and Expenses - Cost of sales (food and paper costs), as a percentage of total restaurant sales, decreased to 28.1% in 2002 from 29.0% in 2001. Burger King cost of sales, as a percentage of Burger King restaurant sales, decreased to 26.8% in 2002 from 28.1% in 2001. This decrease was due to lower promotional sales discounts in 2002 compared to 2001, lower beef costs, and to a lesser extent, the effects of menu price increases in 2001 and the slight reduction in the size of the Burger King regular hamburger patty in the fourth quarter of 2001. Pollo Tropical cost of sales, as a percentage of Pollo Tropical restaurant sales, decreased to 30.7% in 2002 from 32.2% in 2001 due to lower chicken breast costs in 2002 and the effect of menu price increases at the beginning of 2002. Taco Cabana cost of sales, as a percentage of Taco Cabana restaurant sales, increased slightly to 29.3% in 2002 from 29.2% in 2001 due to higher contracted beef costs which were not offset by menu price increases in 2002.

 

30


Restaurant wages and related expenses, as a percentage of total restaurant sales, increased to 29.9% in 2002 from 29.5% in 2001. Burger King restaurant wages and related expenses, as a percentage of Burger King restaurant sales, increased to 31.2% in 2002 from 30.7% in 2001 due to the effect of lower sales volumes on fixed labor costs and higher state unemployment tax rates offset, in part, by menu price increases in 2001. Pollo Tropical restaurant wages and related expenses, as a percentage of Pollo Tropical restaurant sales, increased to 26.4% in 2002 from 24.8% in 2001 due to the effect of lower sales volumes on fixed labor costs and higher workers compensation and medical insurance costs. Taco Cabana restaurant wages and related expenses, as a percentage of Taco Cabana restaurant sales, were 29.2% in 2002 and 2001.

 

Other restaurant operating expenses (which includes advertising) as a percentage of total restaurant sales, was 17.6% in both 2002 and 2001. Burger King other restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of Burger King restaurant sales, increased slightly to 18.7% in 2002 from 18.6% in 2001 due to an increase in local advertising expenditures. Pollo Tropical other restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of Pollo Tropical restaurant sales, increased to 14.7% in 2002 from 13.7% in 2001. This increase was due to the effect of lower comparable restaurant sales volumes in 2002 on fixed costs, higher maintenance expenses to enhance our restaurants in 2002 and an insurance gain of $0.4 million in 2001, partially offset by lower utility costs in 2002. Taco Cabana other restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of Taco Cabana restaurant sales, decreased to 16.7% in 2002 from 17.7% in 2001 due primarily to lower utility and advertising costs, offset in part by higher maintenance expenses in 2002 to enhance our restaurants.

 

Restaurant rent expense, as a percentage of total restaurant sales, decreased slightly to 4.7% in 2002 from 4.8% in 2001.

 

General and administrative expenses increased $1.2 million in 2002 compared to 2001 due primarily to higher administrative bonus levels in 2002. As a percentage of total restaurant sales, general and administrative expenses increased to 5.6% in 2002 from 5.4% in 2001.

 

Adjusted EBITDA - Earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, loss on extinguishment of debt and other income and expense (“Adjusted EBITDA”) increased 3.0% to $94.3 million in 2002 from $91.6 million in 2001. As a percentage of total revenues, Adjusted EBITDA margins increased to 14.4% in 2002 compared to 14.0% in 2001 as a result of the factors discussed above. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on page 32.

 

Depreciation and Amortization - Depreciation and amortization in 2002 was $44.1 million, a decrease of $3.9 million compared to 2001 due to the elimination of goodwill amortization under SFAS 142 beginning January 1, 2002. Goodwill amortization was $5.0 million in 2001. This decrease was partially offset by additional depreciation resulting from our capital expenditures, including restaurant acquisitions, of $103.3 million since the beginning of 2001.

 

Interest Expense - Interest expense decreased $5.6 million to $35.0 million in 2002 from $40.6 million in 2001 due primarily to lower interest rates on our floating rate debt, and to a lesser extent, lower average debt balances in 2002. The average effective interest rate on all debt was 7.3% for 2002 compared to 8.5% for 2001.

 

Income Taxes - The provision for income taxes for 2002 was derived using an effective income tax rate of 36.5%. This rate is higher than the Federal statutory tax rate of 34% due to state and foreign taxes and the non-deductible amortization of certain franchise rights.

 

31


Net Income - As a result of the foregoing, net income was $9.7 million in 2002 compared to a net loss of $6.1 million in 2001. Net income in 2001 included a non-recurring pre-tax charge of $8.8 million related to the closing of seven Taco Cabana restaurants in the Phoenix, Arizona market.

 

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures (as restated)

 

Restaurant level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are presented because we believe they are useful financial indicators for measuring the ability to service and/or incur indebtedness. However, they should not be considered as an alternative to net income as a measure of operating results or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A reconciliation of Restaurant level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for each of our concepts to net income (loss) for each of the last five years is presented below:

 

Year Ended December 31, 1999 (as restated):


       

Burger

King


   

Pollo

Tropical


    Consolidated

 

Restaurant level EBITDA

          $ 57,145     $ 22,290     $ 79,435  

Less (Add): Franchise royalty revenues and fees

            —         (1,039 )     (1,039 )

General and administrative expense

            18,286       4,816       23,102  
           


 


 


Adjusted EBITDA

          $ 38,859     $ 18,513       57,372  
           


 


       
Less:           Depreciation and amortization expense                             26,499  

Interest expense

                            26,844  

Provision for income taxes

                            2,342  

Loss on extinguishment of debt

                            1,825  
                           


Net loss

                          $ (138 )
                           


Year Ended December 31, 2000 (as restated):


  

Burger

King


  

Pollo

Tropical


   

Taco

Cabana(1)


    Consolidated

 

Restaurant level EBITDA

   $ 64,750    $ 25,197     $ 1,241     $ 91,188  

Less (Add): Franchise royalty revenues and fees

     —        (1,028 )     (11 )     (1,039 )

General and administrative expense

     20,764      5,262       377       26,403  
    

  


 


 


Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 43,986    $ 20,963     $ 875       65,824  
    

  


 


       
Less (Add): Other income                             (1,365 )(2)

Depreciation and amortization expense

                            31,815  

Interest expense

                            28,696  

Provision for income taxes

                            3,407  

Loss on extinguishment of debt

                            575  
                           


Net income

                          $ 2,696  
                           


Year Ended December 31, 2001 (as restated):


  

Burger

King


  

Pollo

Tropical


   

Taco

Cabana


    Consolidated

 

Restaurant level EBITDA

   $ 63,801    $ 26,026     $ 35,546     $ 125,373  

Less (Add): Franchise royalty revenues and fees

     —        (1,174 )     (405 )     (1,579 )

General and administrative expense

     20,582      5,115       9,696       35,393  
    

  


 


 


Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 43,219    $ 22,085     $ 26,255       91,559  
    

  


 


       

Less:           Other expense

                            8,841 (3)

Depreciation and amortization expense

                            47,966  

Interest expense

                            40,552  

Provision for income taxes

                            274  
                           


Net loss

                          $ (6,074 )
                           


 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2002 (as restated):


  

Burger

King


  

Pollo

Tropical


   

Taco

Cabana


    Consolidated

 

Restaurant level EBITDA

   $ 65,980    $ 26,375     $ 37,086     $ 129,441  

Less (Add): Franchise royalty revenues and fees

     —        (1,053 )     (429 )     (1,482 )

General and administrative expense

     22,329      5,044       9,237       36,610  
    

  


 


 


Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 43,651    $ 22,384     $ 28,278       94,313  
    

  


 


       
Less:     Depreciation and amortization expense                             44,051  

Interest expense

                            34,955  

Provision for income taxes

                            5,593  
                           


Net income

                          $ 9,714  
                           


Year Ended December 31, 2003:


  

Burger

King


  

Pollo

Tropical


   

Taco

Cabana


    Consolidated

 

Restaurant level EBITDA

   $ 56,813    $ 27,575     $ 35,080     $ 119,468  

Less (Add): Franchise royalty revenues and fees

     —        (993 )     (413 )     (1,406 )

General and administrative expense

     20,026      6,015       11,082       37,123  
    

  


 


 


Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 36,787    $ 22,553     $ 24,411       83,751  
    

  


 


       
Less:           Depreciation and amortization expense                             47,253  

Interest expense

                            32,363  

Provision for income taxes

                            1,767  
                           


Net income

                          $ 2,368  
                           


 


(1) Taco Cabana was acquired in December 2000.
(2) Related to income recognized from deferred contractual payments received upon termination of a supply agreement.
(3) Related to the closure of seven Taco Cabana restaurants in 2001.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We do not have significant receivables or inventory and receive trade credit based upon negotiated terms in purchasing food products and other supplies. We are able to operate with a substantial working capital deficit because:

 

  restaurant operations are primarily conducted on a cash basis;

 

  rapid turnover results in a limited investment in inventories; and

 

  cash from sales is usually received before related accounts for food, supplies and payroll become due.

 

Our cash requirements arise primarily from:

 

  the need to finance the opening and equipping of new restaurants;

 

  ongoing capital reinvestment in our existing restaurants; and

 

  servicing our debt.

 

Our 2003 operations generated approximately $48.2 million in cash, compared with $56.0 million in 2002 and $48.0 million in 2001.

 

32


In 2003, we sold 34 restaurant properties in sale/leaseback transactions for net proceeds of $47.6 million. In 2003, we also sold four non-operating properties for net proceeds of $2.7 million and a Burger King operating property for net proceeds of $1.2 million. The net proceeds from these sales were used to reduce outstanding debt. In 2002, we sold 12 restaurant properties for $13.7 million in sale/leaseback transactions and used the net proceeds from these sales to reduce outstanding debt.

 

In 2004 we anticipate that our level of sale/leaseback transactions to be significantly reduced from 2003 levels, and that the net proceeds of these transactions will range from $10 million to $15 million.

 

Capital expenditures represent a major investment of cash for us and were, excluding acquisitions, $30.2 million, $54.2 million and $47.6 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Expenditures for new restaurant development were $18.6 million in 2003, $27.5 million in 2002 and $14.5 million in 2001 in connection with the opening of fourteen Burger King restaurants, eleven Pollo Tropical restaurants, and nineteen Taco Cabana restaurants over the past three years. Our capital expenditures also include remodeling costs and capital maintenance projects for the ongoing reinvestment and enhancement of our restaurants that totaled $10.2 million in 2003, $25.3 million in 2002 and $31.6 million in 2001.

 

In 2004 we anticipate total capital expenditures of approximately $20 million to $25 million. These amounts include approximately $9 million to $13 million for the construction of new restaurants and related real estate applicable to our three restaurant concepts. Capital expenditures for 2004 also include expenditures for ongoing reinvestment in our three restaurant concepts for remodeling costs and capital maintenance expenditures ranging from $8 million to $10 million.

 

At December 31, 2003, we had total long-term debt of $295.8 million comprised of $170.0 million of unsecured 9.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008, total borrowings under our senior credit facility of $124.1 million and other debt, primarily capital leases, of $1.7 million. Our senior credit facility provides for a $70 million term loan A facility, an $80 million term loan B facility and a $50 million revolving credit facility. At December 31, 2003, $123.5 million was outstanding under the term loan A and B facilities and $39.2 million was available for borrowing under our revolving credit facility, after reserving $10.2 million for letters of credit guaranteed by the facility, subject to meeting certain financial ratio tests required by the senior credit facility.

 

As a result of the restatement, we were in default related to certain required financial leverage ratios and other covenants under our senior secured credit facility. We have obtained a waiver from our senior secured lenders of any prior non-compliance and defaults resulting from the restatement. In addition, our senior secured credit facility has been amended to exclude all adjustments resulting from this restatement on our financial covenant requirements and to treat on a prospective basis the specified leases as if no restatement of recharacterization has occurred.

 

Borrowings under the revolving credit facility may be used to finance permitted acquisitions and new store development, or for working capital and general corporate purposes. The average weighted interest rate on outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility of December 31, 2003 and 2002 was 4.5% and 5.1%, respectively.

 

Borrowings under the senior credit facility bear interest at a per annum rate, at the Company’s option, of either:

 

  1) the greater of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus .50% plus a margin ranging from .50% to 1.75% for the revolving credit facility and the term loan A facility based on debt to cash flow ratios, and at a fixed margin of 2.5% for the term loan B facility; or

 

  2) LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2% to 3.25% for the revolving credit facility and the term loan A facility based on debt to cash flow ratios, and at a fixed margin of 4% for the term loan B facility.

 

33


The revolving credit facility and the term loan A facility expire on December 31, 2005. However, the revolving credit facility is eligible for a one-year extension based upon request and unanimous approval of the lenders. The term loan B facility expires on December 31, 2007. Amounts under the term loan A facility are repayable as follows:

 

  1) an aggregate of $12.5 million payable in four quarterly installments in 2004;

 

  2) an aggregate of $9.4 million payable in three quarterly installments in 2005; and

 

  3) a final payment of $24.6 million payable upon the term loan A facility’s maturity on December 31, 2005.

 

Amounts under the term loan B facility are repayable as follows:

 

  1) an aggregate of $1.0 million payable in four quarterly installments for each of the years 2004 and 2005;

 

  2) an aggregate of $35.0 million payable in four quarterly installments in 2006;

 

  3) an aggregate of $26.2 million payable in three quarterly installments in 2007; and

 

  4) a final payment of $13.8 million payable upon the term loan B facility’s maturity on December 31, 2007.

 

Interest payments under our senior subordinated notes and other existing debt obligations represent significant liquidity requirements for us. We believe cash generated from our operations and availability under our revolving credit facility will provide sufficient cash availability to cover our working capital needs, capital expenditures, planned development and debt service requirements for the next twelve months.

 

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments at December 31, 2003 (in thousands):

 

     Payments due by period

Contractual Obligations


   Total

  

Less than

1 Year


  

1 – 3

Years


  

3 – 5

Years


  

More than

5 Years


Long-term debt obligations

   $ 294,217    $ 13,617    $ 70,600    $ 210,000    $ —  

Capital lease obligations, including interest (1)

     2,059      554      972      403      130

Operating lease obligations

     309,814      32,673      60,294      48,759      168,088

Financing obligations

     153,678      9,365      19,019      19,733      105,561
    

  

  

  

  

Total contractual obligations

   $ 759,768    $ 56,209    $ 150,885    $ 278,895    $ 273,779
    

  

  

  

  


(1) Includes interest of $444 at December 31, 2003.

 

Long-term debt obligations: Refer to Note 6 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for details of our long-term debt.

 

Capital lease and operating lease obligations: Refer to Note 5 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for details of our capital lease and operating lease obligations.

 

Financing obligations: Refer to Note 7 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for details of our financing obligations.

 

34


Inflation

 

The inflationary factors that have historically affected our results of operations include increases in food and paper costs, labor and other operating expenses. Wages paid in our restaurants are impacted by changes in the Federal and state hourly minimum wage rates. Accordingly, changes in the Federal and state hourly minimum wage rates directly affect our labor cost. The restaurant industry and we typically attempt to offset the effect of inflation, at least in part, through periodic menu price increases and various cost reduction programs. However, no assurance can be given that we will be able to offset such inflationary cost increases in the future.

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

We are exposed to market risk associated with fluctuations in interest rates, primarily limited to our senior credit facility which had outstanding borrowings of $124.1 million at December 31, 2003. Borrowings under our senior credit facility bear interest at a per annum rate, at our option of either:

 

  1) the greater of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus .50% plus a margin ranging from .50% to 1.75% for the revolving credit facility and the term loan A facility based on debt to cash flow ratios, and at a fixed margin of 2.5% for the term loan B facility; or

 

  2) LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2% to 3.25% for the revolving credit facility and the term loan A facility based on debt to cash flow ratios, and at a fixed margin of 4% for the term loan B facility.

 

A 1% change in interest rates would have resulted in an increase or decrease in interest expense of approximately $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

Commodity Price Risk

 

We purchase certain products which are affected by commodity prices and are, therefore, subject to price volatility caused by weather, market conditions and other factors which are not considered predictable or within our control. Although many of the products purchased are subject to changes in commodity prices, certain purchasing contracts or pricing arrangements have been negotiated in advance to minimize price volatility. Where possible, we use these types of purchasing techniques to control costs as an alternative to directly managing financial instruments to hedge commodity prices. In many cases, we believe we will be able to address commodity cost increases, which are significant and appear to be long-term in nature by adjusting our menu pricing. However, long-term increases in commodity prices may result in lower restaurant-level operating margins.

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

The Index to Financial Statements attached hereto is set forth in Item 15.

 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

There have been no changes in or disagreements with our independent accountants on accounting or financial disclosures.

 

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Our senior management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d – 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, we carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as other key members of our management, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of the end of the period covered by this report, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

 

No change occurred in our internal controls concerning financial reporting during our fourth quarter that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

 

As discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have restated our financial statements including applicable footnotes for periods ended prior to December 31, 2003 to report real estate transactions for 86 restaurants consummated during 1991 to 2000 as financing transactions under SFAS No. 98 “Accounting for Leases” rather than as sale/leaseback transactions as previously reported. In order to provide reasonable assurance that any future sale/leaseback transactions that may be entered into by us will be properly accounted for in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, we have enhanced our internal controls to require an evaluation of applicable lease provisions that could affect, in the context of current interpretive guidance pertaining to the application of generally accepted accounting principles for sale/leaseback transactions, the classification of such transactions.

 

35


PART III

 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

 

The following table sets forth information about our directors, executive officers and other named officers:

 

Name


   Age

  

Position with the Company


Alan Vituli

   62    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Daniel T. Accordino

   53    President, Chief Operating Officer and Director

Paul R. Flanders

   47    Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Joseph A. Zirkman

   43    Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Timothy J. LaLonde

   47    Vice President, Controller

Michael A. Biviano

   46    Executive Vice President - Taco Cabana

John W. Haywood

   40    Chief Concept Officer - Hispanic Brands

James E. Tunnessen

   48    Executive Vice President - Pollo Tropical

Benjamin D. Chereskin

   45    Director

Brian F. Gleason

   37    Director

Robin P. Selati

   37    Director

Olaseni Adeyemi Sonuga

   49    Director

Clayton E. Wilhite

   58    Director

 

Certain biographical information regarding our directors, executive officers and other officers is set forth below:

 

Alan Vituli has been Chairman of the Board since 1986 and Chief Executive Officer since March 1992. He is also a Director and Chairman of the Board of Carrols Holdings. Between 1983 and 1985, Mr. Vituli was employed by Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc. as a Senior Vice President responsible for real estate transactions. From 1966 until joining Smith Barney, Mr. Vituli was associated with the accounting firm of Coopers & Lybrand, first as an employee and for the last ten years as a partner. Among the positions held by Mr. Vituli at Coopers & Lybrand was National Director of Mergers and Acquisitions. Before joining Coopers & Lybrand, Mr. Vituli was employed in a family-owned restaurant business. From 1993 through our acquisition of Pollo Tropical in 1998, Mr. Vituli served on the Board of Directors of Pollo Tropical. Mr. Vituli also serves on the Board of Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc.

 

Daniel T. Accordino has been President, Chief Operating Officer and a Director since February 1993. Before that, Mr. Accordino served as Executive Vice President - Operations from December 1986 and as Senior Vice President from April 1984. From 1979 to April 1984 he was Vice President responsible for restaurant operations, having previously served as our Assistant Director of Restaurant Operations. Mr. Accordino has been an employee of the Company since 1972.

 

Paul R. Flanders has been Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since April 1997. Before joining us, he was Vice President-Corporate Controller of Fay’s Incorporated, a retailing chain, from 1989 to 1997, and Vice President-Corporate Controller for Computer Consoles, Inc., a computer systems manufacturer, from 1982 to 1989. Mr. Flanders was also associated with the accounting firm of Touche Ross & Co. from 1977 to 1982.

 

Joseph A. Zirkman became Vice President and General Counsel in January 1993. He was appointed Secretary in February 1993. Before joining us, Mr. Zirkman was an associate with the New York City law firm of Baer Marks & Upham beginning in 1986.

 

36


Timothy J. LaLonde has been Vice President-Controller since July 1997. Before joining us, he was a controller at Fay’s Incorporated, a retailing chain, from 1992 to 1997. Prior to that he was a Senior Audit Manager with the accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP, where he was employed since 1978.

 

Michael A. Biviano has been Executive Vice President of the Taco Cabana Division since January 2002. Prior to that he was Vice President – Regional Director of Operations for our Burger King restaurants since 1989, having served as a district supervisor since 1983. Mr. Biviano has been an employee of the Company since 1973.

 

John W. Haywood joined the Company in January 2003 as Chief Concept Officer – Hispanic Brands. Prior to joining us, he was an independent consultant at HHC, Inc., a firm he founded in 1999 that provided strategic and senior management support for hospitality companies. During this time, Mr. Haywood served as contract Chief Executive Officer of Don Shula’s Steak Houses L.P. and contract Vice President of Operations for Cookexpress, a joint venture with Omaha Steaks, Inc. Mr. Haywood has seventeen years experience in the restaurant industry including employment with Jerrico, Inc. from 1986 to 1990 where he managed the development of Fazolis, a quick-casual Italian concept.

 

James Tunnessen has been Executive Vice President of the Pollo Tropical Division since August 2003. Prior to that he was Vice President – Regional Director of Operations for our Burger King restaurants since 1988, having served as a district supervisor from 1979. Mr. Tunnessen has been an employee of the Company since 1972.

 

Benjamin D. Chereskin has served as a Director since March 1997. Mr. Chereskin is a Managing Director of Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC, a private equity firm, and co-founded the firm in 1993. Before that, Mr. Chereskin was with First Chicago Venture Capital for nine years. Mr. Chereskin also serves on the Board of Directors of Cornerstone Brands, Inc.; Tuesday Morning Corporation; NWL Holdings, Inc.; and Family Christian Stores, Inc.

 

Brian F. Gleason has served as a Director since October 2003. Mr. Gleason is Managing Director and Executive Vice President of Phoenix Management Services, Inc., a national corporate revitalization advisory firm. Mr. Gleason has been affiliated with Phoenix Management Services since 1996 and serves on its Board of Directors. Prior to that, Mr. Gleason worked in Corporate Finance for Reliance Insurance Company since 1991. Mr. Gleason also serves on the Board of Directors of Thompson Products, Inc; International Intimates, Inc.; and Springfield Service Corp.

 

Olaseni Adeyemi Sonuga has served as a Director since March 2004. Mr. Sonuga is the Interim Group General Manager of Bahrain International Bank E.C., a Bahraini publicly quoted international investment bank that he became associated with in 2002. Between 1999 and 2002 Mr. Sonuga served as Advisor to the Chairman of Oman Aviation Services Company SAOG, an Omani listed company that owns Oman Air and also provides airport services at all Omani airports. Prior to this he was a Vice President at Taib Bank, a Bahraini listed company since 1997. In the period 1992 to 1997 he was employed as the Business Services Manager of the National Drilling Company of Abu Dhabi, UAE. He began his career as a Chartered Accountant in the UK in 1979 when he joined Touche Ross’s London Office.

 

Robin P. Selati has served as a Director since March 1997. Mr. Selati is a Managing Director of Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC, a private equity firm, and joined the firm in 1993. Before 1993, Mr. Selati was associated with Alex Brown & Sons Incorporated in the consumer/retail investment banking group. Mr. Selati also serves on the Board of Directors of Peter Piper, Inc., Tuesday Morning Corporation; NWL Holdings, Inc.; Beverages & More, Inc.; Family Christian Stores, Inc.; and Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc.

 

37


Clayton E. Wilhite has served as a Director since July 1997. Since January 1998, Mr. Wilhite has been with CFI Group, Inc., has been its Managing Partner since May 1998, and has served on its Board of Directors since September 1998. CFI Group, Inc. is an international management consulting firm specializing in measuring customer satisfaction. Between 1996 and 1998, he was the Chairman of Thurloe Holdings, L.L.C. From August 1996 through our acquisition of Pollo Tropical, Mr. Wilhite served on the Board of Directors of Pollo Tropical, Inc. Before 1996, Mr. Wilhite was with the advertising firm of D’Arcy Masius Benton & Bowles, Inc. having served as its Vice Chairman from 1995 to 1996, as President of DMB&B/North America from 1988 to 1995, and as Chairman and Managing Director of DMB&B/St. Louis from 1985 to 1988.

 

All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. Our executive officers are chosen by the Board and serve at its discretion. All of our directors also serve as directors of Carrols Holdings.

 

Audit Committee Financial Expert

 

The Company’s audit committee is comprised of Robin P. Selati and Clayton E. Wilhite. The Board of Directors has determined that the Company has at least one audit committee financial expert, Robin P. Selati, serving on its audit committee. Mr. Selati is serving on the Board of Directors as a designee of Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., principal stockholders of Carrols Holdings, in accordance with the Company’s stockholders agreement. See Item 13. “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” for a description of the Company’s stockholders agreement. Consequently Mr. Selati is not deemed to be an “independent” director as such term is used in the Federal securities laws. Because the Company’s securities are not listed on any national securities exchange or Nasdaq, the Company is not required to have independent members of its Board of Directors or any committee thereof, including its audit committee.

 

Code of Ethics

 

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its chief executive officer, chief operating officer, chief financial officer, general counsel, controller and other principal financial accounting and executive employees. The Company’s Code of Ethics is posted on its website at http://www.carrols.com. All amendments and waivers to the Code of Ethics will be disclosed through the website.

 

38


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The following tables set forth certain information for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 for our Chief Executive Officer and our next four most highly compensated executive officers who served as executive officers of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2003 and whose annual compensation exceeded $100,000. Stock option data refers to the stock options of Carrols Holdings.

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

Name and Principal Position


   Annual Compensation

  

Long-Term

Compensation

Securities

Underlying

Options(#)(b)


   Other
Compensation


 
        
        
   Year

   Salary

   Bonus(a)

     

Alan Vituli
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

   2003
2002
2001
   $
 
 
550,008
525,000
500,004
   $
 
 
—  
551,250
—  
   —  
39,045
—  
   $
 
 
17,000
17,000
17,000
(c)
(c)
(c)

Daniel T. Accordino
President, Chief Operating Officer and Director

   2003
2002
2001
   $
 
 
420,000
400,008
380,004
   $
 
 
—  
360,007
—  
   —  
26,030
—  
   $
 
 
7,125
7,125
7,125
(c)
(c)
(c)

Nicholas A. Castaldo
President and Chief Operating Officer,
Pollo Tropical Division

   2003
2002
2001
   $
 
 
284,250
347,288
330,000
   $
 
 
—  
—  
—  
   —  
—  
—  
   $
 
 
364,652
—  
—  
(d)
 
 

Michael A. Biviano
Executive Vice President – Taco Cabana Division

   2003
2002
2001
   $
 
 
234,231
215,000
115,008
   $
 
 
—  
92,020
31,282
   20,000
50,000
200
    
 
 
—  
—  
—  
 
 
 

Paul R. Flanders
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer

   2003
2002
2001
   $
 
 
210,000
200,004
181,500
   $
 
 
—  
180,004
—  
   500
1,900
1,000
    
 
 
—  
—  
—  
 
 
 

Joseph A. Zirkman
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

   2003
2002
2001
   $
 
 
210,000
200,004
148,632
   $
 
 
—  
180,004
—  
   500
1,900
1,000
    
 
 
—  
—  
—  
 
 
 

(a) We provide bonus compensation to executive officers based on an individual’s achievement of certain specified objectives and our achievement of specified increases in stockholder value. Of the bonuses earned in 2000 by Mr. Vituli, Mr. Accordino, Mr. Flanders and Mr. Zirkman, $120,177, $108,000, $40,625 and $38,500, respectively, was subject to deferral, one-third to be paid in each of the three succeeding years provided that stockholder value is at least equal to what it was in the year that the bonus was earned. At March 15, 2004, two-thirds of the aforementioned amounts had been paid and the final one-third was forfeited in 2003.
(b) Stock options for Mr. Vituli, Mr. Accordino, Mr. Flanders and Mr. Zirkman are for shares of Carrols Holdings’ Carrols class of common stock. Stock options in 2002 and 2003 for Mr. Biviano are for shares of Carrols Holdings’ Taco Cabana common stock and in 2001, for shares of Carrols Holdings’ Carrols class of common stock.
(c) Represents the premiums paid by us prior to July 2003 for split-dollar life insurance policies whereby Mr. Vituli and Mr. Accordino have designated beneficiaries.
(d) Represents payments to Mr. Castaldo in connection with the termination of his employment agreement in the third quarter of 2003.

 

39


    

Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year

Individual Grants


  

Potential Realizable

Value at Assumed

Annual Rates

of Stock

Appreciation for

Option Term (c)


       
       
       
    

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options

Granted(a)


  

% of Total

Options

Granted to

Employees

in 2003


   

Exercise

Price

(Price

per Share)


   Expiration
Date


  
               

Name


              5%

   10%

Michael A. Biviano(a)

   20,000    8.9 %   $ 14.25    12/31/2013    $ 179,235    $ 454,217

Paul R. Flanders(b)

   500    1.9 %   $ 124.00    12/31/2013    $ 38,991    $ 98,812

Joseph A. Zirkman(b)

   500    1.9 %   $ 124.00    12/31/2013    $ 38,991    $ 98,812

(a) Stock option grants for Mr. Biviano were granted under the 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan. These options which are for Carrols Holdings’ Taco Cabana class of common stock, become exercisable at the rate of 20% per year beginning on December 31, 2003.
(b) Stock option grants for Mr. Flanders and Mr. Zirkman were granted under the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan. These options which are for Carrols Holdings’ Carrols class of common stock, become exercisable at the rate of 25% per year beginning on December 31, 2003.
(c) Potential realizable value is based on an assumption that the price of common shares appreciates at 5% and 10% annually (compounded) from the date of grant until the end of the option term. These calculations are based on requirements promulgated by the Commission and are not intended to forecast possible future appreciation of the stock price.

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

During the last fiscal year, no executive officer of ours served as a director of or member of a compensation committee of any entity for which any of the persons serving on our Board of Directors or on the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is an executive officer. The Compensation Committee is comprised of Messrs. Chereskin and Wilhite.

 

Board of Directors

 

Directors’ Compensation . Directors who are our employees do not receive any additional compensation for serving as directors. Directors who are not our employees receive a fee of $15,000 per annum. All directors are reimbursed for all reasonable expenses they incur while acting as directors, including as members of any committee of the Board of Directors.

 

Liability Limitation. As permitted under the Delaware General Corporation Law, our Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that a director will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of a fiduciary duty owed to our stockholders or us. By its terms and in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, however, this provision does not eliminate or limit the liability of any of our directors:

 

  for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders;

 

  for an act or omission not in good faith or involving intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;

 

  for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit; or

 

  for an improper declaration of dividends or purchase or redemption of our securities.

 

Indemnification. Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.

 

40


Description of Plans

 

Employee Retirement Plan. We offer salaried employees the option to participate in the Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan. Under the plan, our contributions begin to vest after one year and fully vest after five years of service. A year of service is defined as a plan year during which an employee completes at least 1,000 hours of service. Our contributions are equal to 50% of the employee’s contribution to a maximum contribution of $520 annually. The plan includes a pre-tax savings option pursuant to section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code in addition to a post-tax savings option. Participating employees may contribute up to 18% of their salary annually to either of the savings options, subject to other limitations. The employees have various investment options available under a trust established by the plan. The employee’s contributions may be withdrawn at any time, subject to restrictions on future contributions. Our matching contributions may be withdrawn by the employee under certain conditions of financial necessity or hardship as defined in the plan. Our contributions to the Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan totaled $471,000, $468,000 and $327,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

 

Bonus Plans. We have cash bonus plans designed to promote and reward excellent performance by providing employees with incentive compensation. Key senior management executives of each operating division can be eligible for bonuses equal to varying percentages of their respective annual salaries determined by our performance as well as the division’s performance.

 

Long-Term Incentive Plans. Carrols Holdings maintains several long-term incentive plans. These plans and the number of options authorized as of February 15, 2004 were as follows:

 

Carrols Holdings Corporation 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan

   189,325

Carrols Holdings Corporation 1998 Directors’ Stock Option Plan

   10,000

Carrols Holdings Corporation 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan

   100,000

Carrols Holdings Corporation 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan

   500,000

 

These plans are designed to advance our interests and the interests of Carrols Holdings by providing an additional incentive to attract, retain and motivate qualified and competent persons through the encouragement of stock ownership or stock appreciation rights in Carrols Holdings. Under the terms of these plans, we may grant awards such as “Incentive Stock Options” (as defined under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code), nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares and performance units and other stock-based awards to certain of our employees, including executive officers, and our subsidiaries’ officers and employees. Eligibility under the 1998 Directors’ Stock Option Plan is limited to non-employee Directors of our Board. Directors that are our employees or employees of Carrols Holdings, Madison Dearborn Capital Partners or BIB Holdings, or any of their respective affiliates are not eligible under this plan.

 

The 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the 1998 Directors’ Stock Option Plan permit the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Carrols Holdings to grant, from time to time, options to purchase shares of Carrols Holdings’ Company class of common stock. The 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan provides for the granting of options to purchase shares of Carrols Holdings’ Pollo Tropical class of common stock and the 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan provides for the granting of options to purchase shares of Carrols Holdings’ Taco Cabana class of common stock.

 

41


The vesting periods for options and the expiration dates for exercisability of options granted under these plans are determined by Carrols Holdings’ Compensation Committee; however, the exercise period for an option granted may not exceed ten years from the date of the grant. On February 26, 2003 the Carrols Holdings’ Compensation Committee extended the expiration date to February 29, 2012 for all options granted prior to March 1, 2002 under the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan for all Named Executive Officers and certain other officers of the Company. The Carrols Holdings’ Compensation Committee determines the option exercise price per share of any option granted; however, the option price per share of an option intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option shall not be less than the fair market value of the applicable class of Carrols Holdings’ common stock on the date such option is granted. Payment of such option exercise price shall be made:

 

  (1) in cash;

 

  (2) by delivering shares of Carrols Holdings’ common stock already owned by the holder of such options and held for a period of at least six months;

 

  (3) by delivering a promissory note (except in the case of executive officers and directors);

 

  (4) by a combination of any of the foregoing, in accordance with the terms of the particular plan, the applicable stock option agreement and any applicable guidelines of Carrols Holdings’ Compensation Committee in effect at the time; or

 

  (5) by any other means approved by Carrols Holdings’ Compensation Committee.

 

If the holder of an option issued pursuant to these plans (other than executive officers or directors) elects to pay the exercise price of such option by delivering a promissory note, such promissory note may be either:

 

  (1) unsecured and fully recourse against the holder of such option; or

 

  (2) nonrecourse with respect to payment of the principal amount, recourse with respect to the payment of interest, and secured by the shares of Carrols Holdings’ common stock being purchased by such exercise and by other assets having a fair market value equal to not less than 40% of the exercise price of such option. In either event, such note shall mature on the fifth anniversary of the date of the note and bear interest at the rate provided under Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

 

Pursuant to these plans, in the event of a Change of Control (as defined in the respective plan) any and all options issued and outstanding will vest and become exercisable in full on the date of such Change of Control. Under the terms of the 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan, a change of control includes both a change of control of Carrols Holdings or a sale of the Pollo Tropical Group. Under the terms of the 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan, a change of control includes both a change of control of Carrols Holdings or a sale of the Taco Cabana Group.

 

As soon as practicable but no later than thirty days before such Change of Control, Carrols Holdings’ Compensation Committee shall notify any holder of an option granted under the respective plan of such Change of Control. Further, upon a Change of Control that qualifies as an Approved Sale (as defined in the respective plan) in which the outstanding Carrols Holdings’ common stock is converted or exchanged for or becomes a right to receive any cash, property or securities other than Illiquid Consideration (as defined in the respective plan),

 

42


  (1) each option granted under the respective plan shall become exercisable solely for the amount of such cash, property or securities that the holder of such option would have been entitled to had such option been exercised immediately prior to such event;

 

  (2) the holder of such option shall be given an opportunity to either:

 

  (a) exercise such option prior to the consummation of the Approved Sale and participate in such sale as a holder of the respective class of common stock; or

 

  (b) upon consummation of the Approved Sale, receive in exchange for such option consideration equal to the amount determined by multiplying:

 

(x) the same amount of consideration per share received by the holders in connection with the Approved Sale less the exercise price per share of such option by

 

(y) the number of shares of common stock represented by such option; and

 

  (3) to the extent such option is not exercised prior to or simultaneous with such Approved Sale, any such option shall be canceled.

 

Description of Employment Agreements

 

Vituli Employment Agreement. Effective March 27, 2002, we entered into an Extension of Employment Agreement with Alan Vituli which extended the term of an Employment Agreement dated March 27, 1997 between us and Mr. Vituli upon the same terms and conditions as previously set forth in the employment agreement. Pursuant to the employment agreement, which now expires September 30, 2004, Mr. Vituli will continue to serve as our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The employment agreement is subject to automatic renewals for successive one-year terms unless either Mr. Vituli or we elect not to renew by giving written notice to the other at least 90 days before a scheduled expiration date. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Vituli receive a base salary, which was $550,000 when the agreement was extended, and provides that such amount be increased annually by at least $25,000 on each January 1. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Vituli participates in our Executive Bonus Plan and any of our stock option plans applicable to executive employees. The employment agreement also requires us to maintain the premium payments on a split-dollar life insurance policy on the life of Mr. Vituli providing a death benefit of $1.5 million payable to an irrevocable trust designated by Mr. Vituli. Beginning in 2004 premium payments of this policy will be funded by the cash surrender value of policy. The employment agreement also provides that if Mr. Vituli’s employment is terminated without Cause (as defined in the employment agreement) following a Change of Control (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Vituli will receive a cash lump sum equal to his salary during the previous twelve months. The employment agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation provisions effective during the term of the employment agreement and for two years following its termination.

 

43


Accordino Employment Agreement. Effective March 27, 2002, we entered into an Extension of Employment Agreement with Daniel T. Accordino which extended the term of an Employment Agreement dated March 27, 1997 between us and Mr. Accordino upon the same terms and conditions as previously set forth in the employment agreement. Pursuant to the employment agreement, which now expires September 30, 2004, Mr. Accordino will continue to serve as our President and Chief Operating Officer. The employment agreement is subject to automatic renewals for successive one-year terms unless either Mr. Accordino or we elect not to renew by giving written notice to the other at least 90 days before a scheduled expiration date. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Accordino receive a base salary, which was $420,000 when the agreement was extended, and provides that such amount be increased annually by at least $20,000 on each January 1. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Accordino participates in our Executive Bonus Plan and any of our stock option plans applicable to executive employees. The employment agreement also requires us to maintain the premium payments on a split-dollar life insurance policy on the life of Mr. Accordino providing a death benefit of $1.0 million payable to an irrevocable trust designated by Mr. Accordino. Beginning in 2004 premium payments of this policy will be funded by the cash surrender value of policy. The employment agreement also provides that if Mr. Accordino’s employment is terminated without Cause (as defined in the employment agreement) following a Change of Control (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Accordino will receive a cash lump sum equal to his salary during the previous twelve months. The employment agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation provisions effective during the term of the employment agreement and for two years following its termination.

 

Option Agreements

 

Vituli and Accordino Option Agreements Pursuant to the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan. In March 1997, Holdings granted options to purchase 43,350 and 28,900 shares of Holdings’ Carrols class of common stock under the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $101.7646 per share in exchange for options then held by the Vituli Family Trust and by Mr. Accordino, respectively. These options had a term of ten years from the date of grant and became exercisable at varying rates through December 31, 2000 at which time they became fully vested. On March 1, 2002, the expiration date for these options was extended to February 29, 2012.

 

On March 1, 2002, Holdings granted to Mr. Vituli and Mr. Accordino, under the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan, options to purchase 39,045 and 26,030 shares of Carrols Holdings’ Carrols class of common stock, respectively. These options have a term of ten years from the date of grant, an exercise price of $113.00 per share and were immediately exercisable when issued.

 

Non-Plan Option Agreements. In March 1997, Holdings granted to Mr. Vituli, Mr. Accordino and Mr. Zirkman nonqualified stock options to purchase 29,480, 2,579 and 368 shares, respectively, of Carrols Holdings’ Carrols common stock at an exercise price of $101.7646 per share. The options had a term of ten years from the date of grant and became exercisable on the five consecutive anniversaries of the date of grant. On March 1, 2002, the expiration date for these options was extended to February 29, 2012. These options have substantially the same terms as options issued under the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to: (1) the method of payment of the exercise price of the option; and, (2) the effect of a Change of Control (as defined in the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan).

 

44


Other Agreements

 

Change of Control Agreement . On December 27, 2002, we entered into a Change of Control Agreement with two of our Named Executive Officers, Paul R. Flanders and Joseph A. Zirkman, and four other officers of the Company (the “Employees”). The Change of Control Agreement provides that if within one year of a Change of Control (as defined in the Change of Control Agreement) of either Carrols Holdings or the Company, or an Employee’s employment is terminated by us without Cause (as defined in the Change of Control Agreement) or by the Employee for Good Reason (as defined in the Change of Control Agreement), then such Employee shall be entitled to receive (a) a lump sum payment in the amount of one year’s salary at the then current rate, (b) a prorated bonus payment through the date of termination and in accordance with the Executive Bonus Plan then in effect and (c) continued coverage under our welfare and benefits plans for such Employee and his dependents for a period of up to one year or sooner if such benefits are provided to the Employee by a new employer. The payments and benefits due under the Change of Control Agreement cannot be reduced by any compensation earned by Employee or any benefits provided to the Employee as a result of employment by another employer or otherwise. The payments are also not subject to any set-off, counterclaim, recoupment, defense or other right that we may have against the Employee.

 

45


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The following tables set forth the number and percentage of shares of our voting stock and Carrols Holdings’ voting common stock (Carrols class of common stock) and nonvoting classes of common stock (Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana classes of common stock) beneficially owned, as of February 15, 2004, by:

 

  (1) all persons known by us to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the shares of such voting common stock;

 

  (2) each of our directors who owns shares of such voting common stock;

 

  (3) each of our executive officers included in the Summary Compensation Table above; and

 

  (4) all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

 

     Shares Beneficially
Owned


 
     Number

   Percentage

 

Stockholders of Carrols Corporation:

           

Carrols Holdings Corporation

968 James Street

Syracuse, New York 13203

   10    100 %

 

     Carrols Class

    Pollo Tropical Class

   Taco Cabana Class

 
     Number

   Percentage

    Number

   Percentage

   Number

   Percentage

 

Stockholders of Carrols Holdings Corporation(a):

                                

BIB Holdings (Bermuda) Ltd.(b)

c/o Dilmun Investments, Inc.

84 West Park Place

Stamford, CT 06901

   566,667    41.8 %                     

Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P.

Three First National Plaza

Suite 3800

Chicago, IL 60602

   283,333    20.9 %                     

Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P.

(Same address as Madison Dearborn

Capital Partners, L.P.)

   283,334    20.9 %                     

Executive Officers and Directors:

                                

Alan Vituli(c)

   121,702    9.0 %                     

Daniel T. Accordino

   58,369    4.3 %                     

Paul R. Flanders

   4,450    .3 %                     

Joseph A. Zirkman

   4,038    .3 %                     

Michael A. Biviano

   1,872    .1 %             24,000    0.3 %

James E. Tunnessen

   2,085    .1 %                     

Clayton E. Wilhite

   2,750    .2 %                     

Directors and executive officers of Carrols as a group (12 persons)

   196,751    14.5 %         24,000    0.3 %

(a) The number of Carrols class shares shown in the table includes stock options which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days to purchase: 111,875 shares held by Mr. Vituli; 57,509 shares held by Mr. Accordino; 4,450 shares held by Mr. Flanders; 3,915 shares held by Mr. Zirkman; 1,872 shares held by Mr. Biviano; and 2,750 shares held by Mr. Wilhite. The number of Taco Cabana class shares for Mr. Biviano includes 24,000 stock options which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days.
(b) These 566,667 shares of Carrols Holdings’ common stock were previously owned by Atlantic Restaurants, Inc., which was formed to effect the acquisition of the Company in 1996. Atlantic Restaurants, Inc., which was an wholly-owned subsidiary of BIB Holdings, was merged into BIB Holdings on February 10, 1999. BIB Holdings is an wholly-owned subsidiary of Buhrain International Bank, an international financial institution.
(c) Includes 111,875 vested stock options contributed to and held by the Vituli Family Trust.

 

46


Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2003, with respect to all of Carrols Holdings’ compensation plans under which equity securities of Carrols Holdings are authorized for issuance:

 

Plan category


  

Number of securities

to be issued upon

exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights


  

Weighted average

exercise price of

outstanding

options, warrants

and rights


  

Number of

securities remaining

available for

future issuance


Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:

                

1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan

   183,648    $ 110.00    5,677

1998 Directors’ Stock Option Plan

   3,500    $ 117.14    6,500

1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan

   90,775    $ 106.29    9,225

2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan

   334,000    $ 12.59    166,000

Non-Plan Options

   32,427    $ 101.76    —  
    
  

  

Subtotal

   644,350    $ 58.61    187,402

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   —        —      —  
    
  

  

Total

   644,350    $ 58.61    187,402
    
  

  

 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

Stockholders Agreement. On March 27, 1997, in connection with the investment by Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., all holders of Carrols Holdings’ voting common stock entered into a Stockholders Agreement. In general, the agreement (as amended in October 2003) provides that all holders of Carrols Holdings’ voting common stock will vote their common stock in order to cause the following individuals to be elected to the Board of Directors of Carrols Holdings and each of its subsidiaries (including us):

 

  (a) three representatives designated collectively by Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., provided that the third designee shall not be entitled to remain on the Board of Directors unless BIB Holdings has three designees serving on the Board of Directors at such time so long as BIB Holdings is entitled to three Board designees at such time subject to adjustment if the percentage holdings of Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P. collectively, decreases below a certain threshold;

 

  (b) three representatives designated by BIB Holdings, provided that the third designee shall not be entitled to remain on the Board of Directors unless Madison Dearborn has three designees serving on the Board of Directors at such time so long as Madison Dearborn is entitled to three Board designees at such time subject to adjustment if the percentage holdings of BIB Holdings decreases below a certain threshold; and

 

  (c) two representatives designated by Mr. Vituli as long as Mr. Vituli is our Chief Executive Officer

 

Currently, Messrs. Chereskin and Selati are serving on the Board of Directors as designees of Madison Dearborn, Messrs. Gleason, Sonuga and Wilhite are serving on the Board of Directors as designees of BIB Holdings and Messrs. Vituli and Accordino are serving on the Board of Directors as designees of Mr. Vituli. Pursuant to the stockholders agreement as currently in effect, Madison Dearborn has the right, at any time, to either cause a third designee to be elected to the Board of Directors or cause the removal of a third BIB Holdings designee from the Board of Directors.

 

In addition, the agreement provides for certain limitations on the ability of holders of Carrols Holdings’ common stock to sell, transfer, assign, pledge or otherwise dispose of their common stock. The agreement contains covenants requiring us to obtain the prior consent of Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P., Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., and BIB Holdings before taking certain actions including the redemption, purchase or other acquisition of Carrols Holdings’ capital stock, changing the capital budget approved by Carrols Holdings’ Board of Directors for that year or the entry into the ownership, active management or operation of any business other than Burger King franchise restaurants.

 

47


Registration Rights Agreement. On March 27, 1997, in connection with the investment by Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., those entities, BIB Holdings, Alan Vituli, Daniel T. Accordino and Joseph A. Zirkman entered into a registration agreement with Carrols Holdings. The registration agreement provides for demand and piggyback rights with respect to Carrols Holdings’ common stock. The Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P. or BIB Holdings may demand registration under the Securities Act of all or any portion of their shares of Carrols Holdings’ common stock or options for shares of Carrols Holdings’ common stock (the “Registrable Securities”), provided that:

 

  (1) in the case of the first demand registration, Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P., and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P. and BIB Holdings must consent to a demand registration unless Carrols Holdings has completed a registered public offering of the Carrols Holdings’ common stock; and

 

  (2) all demand registrations on Form S-1 must be underwritten.

 

Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., collectively, and BIB Holdings are each entitled to request:

 

  (1) three demand registrations on Form S-1 in which Carrols Holdings will pay all registration expenses, provided that the offering value of the Registrable Securities is at least $15 million; and

 

  (2) an unlimited number of demand registrations on Form S-3 in which Carrols Holdings will pay all registration expenses, provided that the offering value of the Registrable Securities is at least $5 million with an underwritten offering equal to at least $10 million.

 

Whenever Carrols Holdings proposes to register any of its securities (other than pursuant to a demand registration) and the registration form may be used for the registration of Registrable Securities, Carrols Holdings shall give prompt written notice to all holders of Registrable Securities of its intention to effect such a registration and shall include in such registration all Registrable Securities to which Carrols Holdings has received written requests for inclusion in such registration within 20 days after receipt of Carrols Holdings’ notice. Carrols Holdings shall pay the registration expenses of the holders of Registrable Securities in all such piggyback registrations. The Registration Agreement contains typical “cut back” provisions in connection with both demand registrations and piggyback registrations. We will provide the holders of the Registrable Securities with typical indemnification in the event of certain misstatements or omissions made in connection with both demand registrations and piggyback registrations.

 

48


ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

 

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees billed to us by our independent auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PWC):

 

    

Year Ended

December 31,


       2003  

     2002  

     (In thousands)

Audit Fees (a)

   $ 180    $ 157

Audit-Related Fees (b)

     4      6
    

  

Total Audit and Audit Related Fees

     184      163

Tax Fees(c)

     48      40

All Other Fees (d)

     7      23
    

  

Total

   $ 239    $ 226
    

  


(a) Audit fees include services related to the audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and review of the interim quarterly consolidated financial statements for 2003 and 2002.
(b) Audit-related fees for 2003 and 2002 were for annual employee benefit plan audits.
(c) Fees for tax services billed in 2003 and 2002 consisted of $10,000 and $12,000 respectively, for tax compliance and $39,000 and $28,000 respectively, for tax planning and advice.
(d) Other fees for 2003 and 2002 consisted of billings for actuarial services. PWC no longer provides actuarial services to the Company, effective in the third quarter of 2003.

 

    

Year Ended

December 31


 
       2003  

      2002  

 

Percentage of Tax Planning and Advice Fees and All Other Fees to Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax Compliance Fees

   24.1 %   29.6 %

 

In considering the nature of the services provided by the independent auditor, the Audit Committee determined that such services are compatible with the provision of independent audit services. The Audit Committee discussed these services with the independent auditor and Company management to determine that they are permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

Pre-Approval Policy

 

The services performed by the independent auditor in 2003 were pre-approved in accordance with the pre-approval procedures adopted by the Audit Committee at its May 21, 2003 meeting. All requests for audit, audit-related, tax, and other services must be submitted to the Audit Committee for specific pre-approval and cannot commence until such pre-approval has been granted.

 

49


PART IV

 

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

 

(a) (1) Financial Statements

 

     Page

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

    

Report of Independent Auditors

   F-1

Financial Statements:

    

Consolidated Balance Sheets

   F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations

   F-3

Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity

   F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

   F-5 to F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-7 to F-36

 

(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules

 

Schedule


 

Description


      Page

   

II

  Valuation and Qualifying Accounts       F-37    

 

Schedules other than those listed are omitted for the reason that they are not required, not applicable, or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

 

Separate financial statements of the Company are not filed for the reasons that (1) consolidated statements of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries are filed and (2) the Company is primarily an operating Company and all subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial statements filed are wholly-owned.

 

50


(a) (3) Exhibits

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit

Number


  

Description


2.1    Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 3, 1998 by and between Carrols Corporation and Pollo Tropical, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (c)(1) to the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule 14 (d)(1) dated July 3, 1998)
2.2    Agreement and Plan of Merger among Carrols Corporation, Spur Acquisition Corp. and Taco Cabana, Inc. dated October 6, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Carrols Corporation’s Form 8-K filed October 11, 2000).
3.1    Restated By-laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.(3)(b) to Carrols Corporation’s 1986 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
3.2    Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Carrols Holdings Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Carrols Corporation’s September 30, 2001 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q)
4.1    Indenture, dated as of November 24, 1998, between Carrols Corporation, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Carrols Corporation’s Form S-4 filed February 2, 1999)
4.2    Form of 9  1 / 2 % Senior Subordinated Note due 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Carrols Corporation’s Form S-4 filed February 2, 1999)
4.3    First Supplement to Indenture dated as of December 19, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Carrols Corporation’s March 31, 2001 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q)
4.4    Form of Stockholders Agreement by and among Carrols Holdings Corporation, Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P., Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., Atlantic Restaurants, Inc., Alan Vituli, Daniel T. Accordino and Joseph A. Zirkman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Carrols Corporation’s 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
4.5    Form of Registration Agreement by and among Carrols Holdings Corporation, Atlantic Restaurants, Inc., Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P., Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., Alan Vituli, Daniel T. Accordino and Joseph A. Zirkman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Carrols Corporation’s 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
(2) 4.6    First Amendment, dated as of October 14, 2003, to Carrols Holdings Corporation Stockholders Agreement
10.1    Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of February 25, 1997 by and among Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P., Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., Atlantic Restaurants, Inc. and Carrols Holdings Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Carrols Corporation’s 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)

 

51


Exhibit

Number


  

Description


(1) 10.2    Carrols Corporation 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Carrols Corporation’s 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
(1) 10.3    Stock Option Agreement dated as of December 30, 1996 by and between Carrols Corporation and Alan Vituli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Carrols Corporation’s 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
(1) 10.4    Stock Option Agreement dated as of December 30, 1996 by and between Carrols Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Carrols Corporation’s 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
(1) 10.5    Form of Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated March 27, 1997 by and between Carrols Corporation and Alan Vituli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Carrols Corporation’s 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
(1) 10.6    Form of Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated March 27, 1997 by and between Carrols Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Carrols Corporation’s 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
(1) 10.7    Form of Carrols Holdings Corporation 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Carrols Corporation’s 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
(1) 10.8    Form of Stock Option Agreement by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Alan Vituli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Carrols Corporation’s 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
(1) 10.9    Form of Stock Option Agreement by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Carrols Corporation’s 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
(1) 10.10    Form of Unvested Stock Option Agreement by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Alan Vituli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to Carrols Corporation’s 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
(1) 10.11    Form of Unvested Stock Option Agreement by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Carrols Corporation’s 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
(1) 10.12    Form of Unvested Stock Option Agreement by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Joseph A. Zirkman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to Carrols Corporation’s 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
10.13    First Amendment to the Stock Purchase Agreement dated March 27, 1997 by and among Carrols Holdings Corporation, Atlantic Restaurants, Inc., Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to Carrols Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed March 27, 1997)

 

52


Exhibit

Number


  

Description


10.14    Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of January 15, 1997 by and between Carrols Corporation, as Purchaser, Omega Services, Inc. as Seller and Mr. Harold W. Hobgood as Omega’s Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to Carrols Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed March 27, 1997)
10.15    Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of January 15, 1997 by and between Carrols Corporation, as Purchaser, Omega Services, Inc. as Seller and Mr. Harold W. Hobgood as Omega’s Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to Carrols Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed March 27, 1997)
10.16    Purchase Agreement dated as of July 7, 1997 among Carrols Corporation, as Purchaser, and the individuals and trusts listed on Exhibit A attached thereto, as Sellers, the individuals and entities listed on Exhibit B attached thereto, as Affiliated Real Property Owners, and Richard D. Fors, Jr. and Charles J. Mund, as the Seller’s representatives (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to Carrols Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed August 20, 1997)
(1) 10.17    Carrols Holdings Corporation 1998 Directors’ Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Carrols Corporation Form S-4 filed February 2, 1999)
(1) 10.18    Carrols Holdings Corporation 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Carrols Corporation’s September 30, 1999 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q)
(1) 10.19    Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan dated April 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Carrols Corporation’s 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
10.20    Loan Agreement dated as of December 19, 2000 among Carrols Corporation, The Chase Manhattan Bank, Bank of America, N.A., Suntrust Bank, Atlanta, Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company, and the other lenders now or hereafter parties hereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to Carrols Corporation’s Form 8-K filed January 3, 2001)
(1) 10.21    Carrols Holdings Corporation 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan
(1) 10.22    Carrols Corporation and Subsidiaries Deferred Compensation Plan dated January 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Carrols Corporation’s March 31, 2002 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q)
(1) 10.23    Extension of Employment Agreement dated March 27, 2002 by and between Carrols Corporation and Alan Vituli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Carrols Corporation’s June 30, 2002 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q)
(1) 10.24    Extension of Employment Agreement dated March 27, 2002 by and between Carrols Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Carrols Corporation’s June 30, 2002 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q)

 

53


Exhibit

Number


  

Description


(1) 10.25    Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings plan July 1, 2002 Restatement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Carrols Corporation’s September 29, 2002 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q)
(1) 10.26    Addendum incorporating EGTRRA Compliance Amendment to Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan dated September 12, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to Carrols Corporation’s September 29, 2002 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q)
(1) 10.27    Carrols Corporation Change of Control Agreement dated December 27, 2002
(1) 10.28    Extension of Stock Option Awards dated March 1, 2002 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Alan Vituli
(1) 10.29    Extension of Stock Option Awards dated March 1, 2002 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino
(1) 10.30    Extension of Stock Option Awards dated March 1, 2002 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Paul Flanders
(1) 10.31    Extension of Stock Option Awards dated March 1, 2002 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Joseph Zirkman
(1) 10.32    Extension of Stock Option Awards dated March 1, 2002 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Timothy LaLonde
(1) 10.33    Extension of Stock Option Awards dated March 1, 2002 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Michael Biviano
10.34    First Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of March 31, 2003, by and among Carrols Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank, Bank of America N.A., SunTrust Bank, Manufacturers and Traders Trust, The Northern Trust Company, BSB Bank & Trust Company, and the other lenders now or hereafter parties hereto. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to Carrols Corporation’s March 31, 2003 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q)
(2) 10.35    First Amendment, dated as of January 1, 2004, to Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan
(2) 10.36    Second Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of December 31, 2003, by and among Carrols Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank, Bank of America N.A., SunTrust Bank, Manufacturers and Traders Trust and the other lenders now or hereafter parties hereto.
(2) 10.37    Carrols Holdings Corporation First Amended and Restated 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(2) 21.1    List of Subsidiaries
(2) 31.1    Chief Executive Officer’s Certificate Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(2) 31.2    Chief Financial Officer’s Certificate Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

54


Exhibit
Number


  

Description


(2) 32.1    Chief Executive Officer’s Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(2) 32.2    Chief Financial Officer’s Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(1) Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement identified pursuant to this report.
(2) Filed herewith.

 

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

 

Date Filed or Furnished


  

Item Number


  

Description


November 18, 2003    7 and 12    Announced results of operations for the Company’s third fiscal quarter of 2003.

 

55


Report of Independent Auditors

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder

of Carrols Corporation:

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1), page 50, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Carrols Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 28, 2003 and December 29, 2002 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 28, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2), page 50, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company restated previously issued financial statements to account for the sale of certain real estate as financing transactions rather than as sale/leaseback transactions.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Syracuse, New York

February 6, 2004 (except for Notes 2 and 7 for which the date is April 30, 2004

and for Note 12 for which the date is March 12, 2004)

 

F - 1


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)

 

     2003

   

Restated
Note 2

2002


 
ASSETS                 

Current assets:

                

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 2,414     $ 2,538  

Trade and other receivables, net of reserves of $94 and $128, respectively

     1,280       1,306  

Inventories

     4,936       5,240  

Prepaid rent

     2,534       2,227  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     4,043       4,382  

Refundable income taxes

     —         1,253  

Deferred income taxes (Note 9)

     6,286       9,454  
    


 


Total current assets

     21,493       26,400  

Property and equipment, at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization of $194,652 and $168,523, respectively (Note 3)

     236,353       288,288  

Franchise rights, at cost less accumulated amortization of $50,732 and $47,109, respectively

     86,148       90,620  

Intangible assets, at cost less accumulated amortization of $10,258 and $10,061, respectively (Note 3)

     124,844       125,046  

Deferred income taxes (Note 9)

     8,619       5,321  

Other assets

     9,417       11,713  
    


 


Total assets

   $ 486,874     $ 547,388  
    


 


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY                 

Current liabilities:

                

Accounts payable

   $ 17,230     $ 16,099  

Accrued interest

     1,549       1,415  

Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits

     11,545       15,130  

Accrued income taxes payable

     836       —    

Other liabilities

     14,897       14,415  

Current portion of long-term debt (Notes 5 and 6)

     14,005       12,299  

Current portion of financing obligations (Note 7)

     2,288       2,017  
    


 


Total current liabilities

     62,350       61,375  

Long-term debt, net of current portion (Notes 5 and 6)

     281,827       348,046  

Financing obligations, net of current portion (Note 7)

     82,397       84,685  

Deferred income—sale/leaseback of real estate (Note 5)

     8,841       2,523  

Accrued postretirement benefits (Note 14)

     2,962       2,585  

Other liabilities (Note 4)

     27,527       29,572  
    


 


Total liabilities

     465,904       528,786  

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 5 and 12)

                

Stockholder’s equity (Note 10):

                

Common stock, par value $1; authorized 1,000 shares, issued and outstanding – 10 shares

     —         —    

Additional paid-in capital

     24,485       24,485  

Accumulated deficit

     (3,515 )     (5,883 )
    


 


Total stockholder’s equity

     20,970       18,602  
    


 


Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity

   $ 486,874     $ 547,388  
    


 


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

F - 2


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

     2003

  

Restated

Note 2

2002


  

Restated

Note 2

2001


 

Revenues:

                      

Restaurant sales

   $ 643,579    $ 655,545    $ 654,710  

Franchise royalty revenues and fees

     1,406      1,482      1,579  
    

  

  


Total revenues

     644,985      657,027      656,289  
    

  

  


Costs and expenses:

                      

Cost of sales

     181,182      183,976      189,947  

Restaurant wages and related expenses

     194,315      196,258      192,918  

Restaurant rent expense

     31,383      30,494      31,207  

Other restaurant operating expenses

     89,880      87,335      86,435  

Advertising expense

     27,351      28,041      28,830  

General and administrative

     37,123      36,610      35,393  

Depreciation and amortization

     47,253      44,051      47,966  

Other expense (Note 8)

     —        —        8,841  
    

  

  


Total operating expenses

     608,487      606,765      621,537  
    

  

  


Income from operations

     36,498      50,262      34,752  

Interest expense

     32,363      34,955      40,552  
    

  

  


Income (loss) before income taxes

     4,135      15,307      (5,800 )

Provision for income taxes (Note 9)

     1,767      5,593      274  
    

  

  


Net income (loss)

   $ 2,368    $ 9,714    $ (6,074 )
    

  

  


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

F - 3


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

    

Common

Stock


  

Additional

Paid-In-

Capital


  

Accumulated

Deficit


   

Total

Stockholder’s

Equity


 

Balance at December 31, 2000, restated (Note 2)

   $ —      $ 24,485    $ (9,523 )   $ 14,962  

Net loss (restated)

     —        —        (6,074 )     (6,074 )
    

  

  


 


Balance at December 31, 2001, restated (Note 2)

     —        24,485      (15,597 )     8,888  

Net income (restated)

     —        —        9,714       9,714  
    

  

  


 


Balance at December 31, 2002, restated (Note 2)

     —        24,485      (5,883 )     18,602  

Net income

     —        —        2,368       2,368  
    

  

  


 


Balance at December 31, 2003

   $ —      $ 24,485    $ (3,515 )   $ 20,970  
    

  

  


 


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

F - 4


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

     2003

   

Restated

Note 2

2002


   

Restated

Note 2

2001


 

Cash flows provided from operating activities:

                        

Net income (loss)

   $ 2,368     $ 9,714     $ (6,074 )

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided from operating activities:

                        

(Gain)/loss on disposal of property and equipment

     (386 )     24       390  

Depreciation and amortization

     47,253       44,051       47,966  

Other expense (Note 8)

     —         —         7,053  

Deferred income taxes

     (130 )     5,553       (1,688 )

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

                        

Refundable income taxes

     2,089       153       1,522  

Accounts payable

     1,131       (521 )     3,251  

Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits

     (3,585 )     2,143       214  

Accrued acquisition costs

     —         (78 )     (5,534 )

Other liabilities – current

     381       (450 )     2,194  

Accrued interest

     134       (103 )     (729 )

Other liabilities—long-term

     (2,259 )     (4,379 )     (1,549 )

Other

     1,243       (143 )     952  
    


 


 


Net cash provided from operating activities

     48,239       55,964       47,968  
    


 


 


Cash flow used for investing activities:

                        

Capital expenditures:

                        

New restaurant development

     (18,598 )     (27,465 )     (14,525 )

Restaurant remodeling

     (3,317 )     (16,254 )     (21,895 )

Other restaurant expenditures

     (6,925 )     (9,018 )     (9,703 )

Corporate and restaurant information systems

     (1,404 )     (1,418 )     (1,452 )

Acquisition of Burger King restaurants

     —         —         (1,612 )
    


 


 


Total capital expenditures

     (30,244 )     (54,155 )     (49,187 )

Properties purchased for sale-leaseback

     (3,149 )     (925 )     —    

Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment

     3,921       9       31  
    


 


 


Net cash used for investing activities

   $ (29,472 )   $ (55,071 )   $ (49,156 )
    


 


 


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

F - 5


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

     2003

   

Restated

Note 2

2002


   

Restated

Note 2

2001


 

Cash flows provided from (used for) financing activities:

                        

Proceeds (payments) on revolving credit facility, net

   $ (52,200 )   $ (2,700 )   $ 9,900  

Principal payments on term loans

     (11,000 )     (8,500 )     (7,000 )

Principal payments on financing obligations

     (2,017 )     (1,769 )     (1,533 )

Proceeds (payments) from other notes payable, net

     (847 )     (978 )     127  

Principal payments on capital leases

     (446 )     (551 )     (524 )

Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions

     47,619       13,738       —    

Financing costs associated with issuance of debt

     —         —         (89 )
    


 


 


Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities

     (18,891 )     (760 )     881  
    


 


 


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (124 )     133       (307 )

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

     2,538       2,405       2,712  
    


 


 


Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

   $ 2,414     $ 2,538     $ 2,405  
    


 


 


Supplemental disclosures:

                        

Interest paid on long-term debt and financing obligations

   $ 32,229     $ 35,058     $ 41,281  

Income taxes paid (refunded), net

   $ (195 )   $ 1,494     $ 1,230  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

F - 6


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Carrols Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Carrols Holdings Corporation (“Holdings”).

 

At December 31, 2003, the Company operated, as franchisee, 351 quick-service restaurants under the trade name “Burger King” in thirteen Northeastern, Midwestern and Southeastern states. At December 31, 2003, the Company also owned and operated 60 Pollo Tropical restaurants located in Florida and franchised 24 Pollo Tropical restaurants in Puerto Rico, Ecuador and Florida. At December 31, 2003, the Company owned and operated 121 Taco Cabana restaurants located primarily in Texas and franchised nine restaurants in Texas, New Mexico, Georgia and Indiana.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

 

Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Inventories are primarily comprised of food and paper.

 

Property and Equipment. The Company capitalizes all direct costs incurred to construct and substantially improve its restaurants. These costs are depreciated and charged to expense based upon their property classification when placed in service. Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Repair and maintenance activities are expensed as incurred. Depreciation and amortization is provided using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

 

Buildings and improvements

  5 to 30 years

Leasehold improvements

 

Remaining life of lease including renewal options or life of asset whichever is shorter

Equipment

  3 to 15 years

Computer hardware and software

  3 to 7 years

Capital leases

  Remaining life of lease

 

Burger King Franchise Rights. Fees for initial franchises and renewals are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the agreement, generally twenty years. Acquisition costs allocated to franchise rights are amortized using the straight-line method, principally over the remaining lives of the acquired leases, including renewal options, but not in excess of 40 years.

 

Annual amortization expense for all franchise rights is estimated to be $4.6 million in 2004, $4.5 million in 2005, $4.4 million in 2006, $4.3 million in 2007 and $4.1 million in 2008.

 

F - 7


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

Intangible Assets. Intangible assets consist of the excess purchase price over net assets acquired, beneficial leases, unfavorable leases and trademarks. Beneficial leases and unfavorable leases are amortized using the straight-line method over the lives of the leases including renewal options, but not in excess of 40 years. Trademarks are amortized using the straight-line method over 40 years. Prior to January 1, 2002, the excess purchase price over net assets acquired and trademarks was amortized using the straight-line method over 40 years with the exception of the excess cost over fair value associated with the acquisition of Taco Cabana, Inc. which was amortized over 20 years.

 

As of January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which supercedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion 17, “Intangible Assets.” Under SFAS 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized, effective January 1, 2002, but are to be tested at least annually for impairment. The Company performs its impairment evaluation annually at December 31. Separable intangible assets with defined lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives.

 

Long-Lived Assets. The Company assesses the recoverability of property and equipment, franchise rights and intangible assets by determining whether the amortization of these assets, over their respective remaining lives, can be recovered through undiscounted future operating cash flows. Impairment is reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable.

 

Deferred Financing Costs. Financing costs, that are included in other assets and were incurred in obtaining long-term debt and financing obligations, are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related obligation on an effective interest basis for costs associated with the Company’s unsecured senior subordinated notes and on a straight-line basis for costs associated with the Company’s senior credit facility.

 

Franchise Fees associated with Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana restaurants. Franchise fees are typically collected upon execution of an area development and/or franchise agreement. Franchise fees are initially recorded as deferred revenue and are recognized in earnings when the franchised restaurants are opened, or upon forfeiture of such fees by the franchisees pursuant to the terms of the franchise development agreements.

 

F - 8


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

Restaurant Revenue Recognition . Restaurant sales are recognized at time of sale on substantially a cash basis.

 

Royalty Revenues associated with Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana restaurants. Royalty revenues are based on a percent of gross sales and are recorded as income when earned.

 

Income Taxes. The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return.

 

Advertising Costs. All advertising costs are expensed as incurred.

 

Self Insurance. The Company is generally self-insured for workers compensation, general liability and medical insurance. The Company maintains stop loss coverage for both individual and aggregate claim amounts. Losses are accrued based upon the Company’s estimates of the aggregate liability for claims based on Company experience and certain actuarial methods used to measure such estimates. The Company does not discount any of its self-insurance obligations.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate the fair value:

 

  Current Assets and Liabilities. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents and accrued liabilities approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.

 

  Senior Subordinated Notes. The fair values of outstanding senior subordinated notes are based on quoted market prices. The fair values at December 31, 2003 and 2002 are approximately $174.5 million and $146.6 million, respectively.

 

  Revolving and Term Loan Facilities. Rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair value. The recorded amounts, as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, approximated fair value.

 

Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” permits entities to recognize as an expense over the vesting period the fair value of all stock-based awards on the date of grant. Alternatively, SFAS 123 allows entities to continue to apply the provisions of APB 25 and provide pro forma net income disclosures for employee stock option grants as if the fair-value-based method defined in SFAS 123 has been applied. In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure,” amending SFAS 123. SFAS 148 provides revised methods of transition if a company elects to change to the fair-value-based method of accounting for stock-based compensation. Additionally, SFAS 148 requires disclosure in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based compensation and the effect of the method used on

 

F - 9


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

reported results. As required, the Company has provided these disclosures in both its annual and interim financial statements. The Company has not elected to change to the fair value-based-method of accounting for stock-based compensation and will continue applying the provisions of APB 25 and provide the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS 123.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements. The Company has adopted FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others” (“FIN 45”), an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under guarantees issued. FIN 45 also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken. The initial recognition and measurement provisions were applicable to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45 has had no material impact on our financial statements.

 

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46”), an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51. FIN 46 is intended to clarify the application of the majority voting interest requirement of ARB No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements”, to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The controlling financial interest may be achieved through arrangements that do not involve voting interests. A company that holds variable interests in an entity will need to consolidate the variable interest entity (“VIE”) if the company’s interest in the VIE is such that the company will absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses and/or receive a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, if they occur. FIN 46 also requires additional disclosures by primary beneficiaries and other significant variable interest holders. FIN 46 may be applied prospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date on which it is first applied or by restating previously issued financial statements for one or more years with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the first year restated. FIN 46 is effective immediately to a VIE created or obtained after January 31, 2003. FIN 46, as amended, became effective for variable interests in a VIE created before February 1, 2003 at December 31, 2003.

 

FIN 46 has been subsequently modified, clarified and replaced by the issuance of FIN 46R on December 23, 2003. Relative to FIN 46, FIN 46R a) essentially excludes operating businesses from its provisions subject to four conditions, b) states the provisions of FIN 46R are not required to be applied if a company is unable, subject to making an exhaustive effort, to obtain the necessary information, c) includes new definitions and examples of what variable interests are, d) clarifies and changes the definition of a variable interest entity, and e) clarifies and changes the definition and treatment of de facto agents, as that term is defined in FIN 46 and FIN 46R. FIN 46R was issued December 23, 2003 and, for the Company, is effective no later than the end of the first quarter of 2005. The Company is currently reviewing the new provisions of FIN 46R.

 

F - 10


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Fiscal Year . The Company uses a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to December 31. All references herein to fiscal years (52 weeks) December 30, 2001, December 29, 2002 and December 28, 2003 will be referred to as fiscal years December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively.

 

Reclassifications. Certain amounts for prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

 

2. Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements

 

The Company has restated its financial statements including applicable footnotes for periods ended prior to December 31, 2003 to report real estate transactions for 86 restaurants consummated during 1991 to 2000 as financing transactions under SFAS No. 98 “Accounting for Leases” rather than as sale/leaseback transactions as previously reported. The impact of the restatement is to record on the Company’s balance sheets the property and equipment of the restaurants subject to these transactions and record the proceeds from these transactions, (including the gains previously deferred) as a form of debt financing. The restatement also impacted our operating results by increasing the depreciation expense for the property and equipment subject to these transactions and recharacterizing the lease payments previously reported as rent expense for these restaurants as principal repayments and interest expense. There was no impact on sale/leaseback transactions that were consummated in 2002 and 2003.

 

As a result of the restatement, the Company was in default related to certain required financial leverage ratios and other covenants under its senior secured credit facility. The Company has obtained a waiver from its senior secured lenders of any prior non-compliance resulting from the restatement. In addition, the Company’s senior credit facility has been amended to exclude all adjustments resulting from this restatement on its financial covenant requirements and to treat on a prospective basis the specified leases as if no restatement or recharacterization has occurred.

 

The following table sets forth the previously reported amounts and the restated amounts reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements:

 

     December 31, 2002

             
     As
Previously
Reported


    As
Restated


             

Consolidated Balance Sheet:

                                

Property and equipment, net

   $ 219,686     $ 288,288                  

Accumulated depreciation and amortization on property and equipment

     146,782       168,523                  

Deferred income taxes

     535       5,321                  

Other assets

     9,820       11,713                  

Total assets

     472,107       547,388                  

Current portion of financing obligations

     —         2,017                  

Total current liabilities

     59,358       61,375                  

Financing obligations, net of current portion

     —         84,685                  

Deferred income-sale/leaseback of real estate

     5,887       2,523                  

Total liabilities

     445,448       528,786                  

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

     2,174       (5,883 )                

Total stockholder's equity

     26,659       18,602                  

Total liabilities and stockholder's equity

     472,107       547,388                  
    

Year Ended


 
     December 31, 2002

    December 31, 2001

 
     As
Previously
Reported


    As
Restated


    As
Previously
Reported


    As
Restated


 

Consolidated Statement of Operations:

                                

Restaurant rent expense

   $ 39,423     $ 30,494     $ 40,042     $ 31,207  

Depreciation and amortization

     39,580       44,051       43,495       47,966  

Total operating expenses

     611,223       606,765       625,901       621,537  

Income from operations

     45,804       50,262       30,388       34,752  

Interest expense

     27,532       34,955       32,988       40,552  

Income (loss) before income taxes

     18,272       15,307       (2,600 )     (5,800 )

Provision for income taxes

     6,668       5,593       1,364       274  

Net income (loss)

     11,604       9,714       (3,964 )     (6,074 )

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

                                

Net income (loss)

   $ 11,604     $ 9,714     $ (3,964 )   $ (6,074 )

Depreciation and amortization

     39,580       44,051       43,495       47,966  

Deferred income taxes

     6,628       5,553       (599 )     (1,688 )

Other

     (406 )     (143 )     691       952  

Net cash provided from operating activities

     54,195       55,964       46,435       47,968  

Principal payments on financing obligations

     —         (1,769 )     —         (1,533 )

Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities

     1,009       (760 )     2,414       881  

Interest paid on long-term debt and financing obligations

     27,635       35,058       33,717       41,281  

Consolidated Statements of Stockholder's Equity:

                                
     Retained Earnings
(Accumulated Deficit)


    Total Stockholder's
Equity


 
     As
Previously
Reported


    As
Restated


    As
Previously
Reported


    As
Restated


 

Balance at December 31, 2000

   $ (5,466 )   $ (9,523 )   $ 19,019     $ 14,962  

Net loss

     (3,964 )     (6,074 )     (3,964 )     (6,074 )
    


 


 


 


Balance at December 31, 2001

     (9,430 )     (15,597 )     15,055       8,888  

Net income

     11,604       9,714       11,604       9,714  
    


 


 


 


Balance at December 31, 2002

   $ 2,174     $ (5,883 )   $ 26,659     $ 18,602  
    


 


 


 


 

The accumulated deficit previously reported at December 31, 2000 of $5,466 has been restated to $9,523, which is an increase of $4,057, to reflect the effect of the restatement adjustments for the periods prior to fiscal 2001. Such cumulative adjustments also had the corresponding effect of increasing property and equipment by $77,303, increasing other assets by $2,135 for the transactional costs associated with the financing obligations, increasing deferred tax assets by $2,620, increasing financing obligations by $90,004 and decreasing deferred income on sale/leaseback of real estate by $3,889.

 

All previously reported amounts affected by the restatement that appear elsewhere in these footnotes to the consolidated financial statements have also been restated.

 

3. Property and Equipment and Intangible Assets

 

Property and equipment at December 31 consist of the following:

 

     2003

   

2002

As Restated

Note 2


 

Land

   $ 14,700     $ 32,294  

Buildings and improvements

     34,446       48,231  

Leasehold improvements

     107,463       107,663  

Equipment

     171,092       165,007  

Assets subject to financing obligations

     90,343       90,343  

Capital leases

     12,961       13,273  
    


 


       431,005       456,811  

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

     (194,652 )     (168,523 )
    


 


     $ 236,353     $ 288,288  
    


 


 

Capital lease assets pertain to buildings leased for certain restaurant locations. Accumulated amortization pertaining to capital lease assets at December 31, 2003 and 2002 was $12,030 and $11,710, respectively. Assets subject to financing obligations pertain to certain land and buildings which have been sold and accounted for as financing transactions. Accumulated depreciation pertaining to assets subject to financing obligations at December 31, 2003 and 2002 was $26,092 and $21,741, respectively. Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $40,611, $36,851 and $35,361, respectively.

 

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, excluding goodwill, for impairment at the restaurant level. If an indicator of impairment exists for any of the assets, an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by each restaurant is compared to that restaurants’ carrying value. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured by the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company has recorded impairment charges, included in depreciation and amortization, of $706, $1,033 and $578, respectively, related to all of its property and equipment for certain of its operating Burger King restaurants and $3,445, $253 and $0, respectively, related to all of its property and equipment for certain of its operating Taco Cabana restaurants.

 

F - 11


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

As of January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which supercedes APB Opinion 17, “Intangible Assets.” Under SFAS 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized, effective January 1, 2002, but are to be tested at least annually for impairment. Separable intangible assets with defined lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The provisions of SFAS 142 apply to goodwill and intangible assets acquired before and after the statement’s effective date. SFAS 142 required the Company to complete Step 1 of a transitional goodwill impairment test by June 30, 2002. Step 1 required the comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value at January 1, 2002 to determine whether there was an indicated transitional goodwill impairment. Our evaluation of impairment under Step 1 of the transitional goodwill impairment test indicated that our reporting units’ fair values are above their carrying values at January 1, 2002 and that there is no transitional goodwill impairment charge required.

 

The Company has elected to annually test for goodwill impairment at December 31. In accordance with SFAS 142, the Company has determined its reporting units to be at the operating segment level. The Company’s operating segments include: Burger King, operating as a franchisee, Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana, both Company owned concepts. At December 31, 2003, using the market multiple method of valuation, the identified reporting units were measured for goodwill impairment by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of the goodwill. The result of this test determined there has been no goodwill impairment.

 

Provided below is a reconciliation of restated financial statement information to pro forma amounts that reflect the elimination of goodwill amortization for the comparable annual period prior to adoption of SFAS 142, for the year ended December 31:

 

    

2001

Note 2


 

Net income (loss), as restated

   $ (6,074 )

Add: Goodwill amortization, net of tax

     4,966  
    


Pro forma net income

   $ (1,108 )
    


 

Intangible assets at December 31 consist of the following:

 

     2003

   2002

Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization
of $10,053 and $9,902, respectively

   $ 123,861    $ 124,012

Trademarks, net of accumulated amortization
of $36 and $36, respectively

     228      228

Other, net of accumulated amortization
of $169 and $123, respectively

     755      806
    

  

     $ 124,844    $ 125,046
    

  

 

F - 12


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

Goodwill for Burger King and Pollo Tropical was $1,450 and $57,154, respectively, at both December 31, 2003 and 2002. Taco Cabana goodwill at December 31, 2003 and 2002 was $65,257 and $65,408, respectively.

 

Amortization expense of intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $201, $63 and $5,048, respectively.

 

Annual amortization expense for all intangible assets is estimated to be $23 in the year 2004 and $0 in years 2005 through 2008.

 

4. Other Liabilities, Long-Term

 

Other liabilities, long-term, at December 31, consist of the following:

 

     2003

   2002

Unearned purchase discounts

   $ 10,888    $ 13,330

Accrued occupancy costs

     8,012      12,035

Other

     8,627      4,207
    

  

     $ 27,527    $ 29,572
    

  

 

Unearned purchase discounts are amortized as a reduction of cost of sales either over the life of the supplier contract or the estimated purchase commitment period. In 2000, Burger King Corporation arranged for the Coca-Cola Company and Dr. Pepper/Seven-Up, Inc. to provide funding to franchisees in connection with Burger King’s transformation initiatives. The Company received approximately $19.8 million in 2000 and $1.6 million in 2001 under this arrangement with these suppliers. The total amount of these purchase discounts amortized for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $2.2 million, $2.2 million and $2.0 million, respectively.

 

Accrued occupancy costs include obligations pertaining to closed restaurant locations, contingent rent and accruals to expense operating lease rental payments on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

 

5. Leases

 

The Company utilizes land and buildings in its operations under various lease agreements. These leases generally contain an initial term of twenty years and, in most cases, contain renewal options. The rent payable under such leases includes a minimum rent provision and, in some cases, includes a percentage of sales provision. In addition, most leases require payment of property taxes, insurance and utilities.

 

Deferred gains have been recorded as a result of certain sale/leaseback transactions and are being amortized over the lives of the related leases. These related leases have been classified as operating leases and generally contain a twenty-year initial term with renewal options.

 

F - 13


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

Minimum rent commitments under capital and non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 2003 were as follows:

 

Years Ending


   Capital

   

Operating

As Restated

Note 2


2004

   $ 554     $ 32,673

2005

     534       31,284

2006

     438       29,010

2007

     289       26,001

2008

     114       22,758

Thereafter

     130       168,088
    


 

Total minimum lease payments

     2,059     $ 309,814
            

Less amount representing interest

     (444 )      
    


     

Total obligations under capital leases

     1,615        

Less current portion

     (388 )      
    


     

Long-term obligations under capital leases

   $ 1,227        
    


     

 

Total rent expense on operating leases, including percentage rent on both operating and capital leases, for the past three fiscal years was as follows:

 

     2003

  

2002

As Restated

Note 2


  

2001

As Restated

Note 2


Minimum rent on real property

   $ 29,395    $ 27,328    $ 27,525

Additional rent based on a percentage of sales

     1,988      3,166      3,682
    

  

  

Restaurant rent expense

     31,383      30,494      31,207
                      

Administrative rent

     799      747      767

Equipment rent

     373      294      255
    

  

  

     $ 32,555    $ 31,535    $ 32,229
    

  

  

 

F - 14


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

6. Long-Term Debt

 

Long-term debt at December 31 consisted of:

 

     2003

    2002

 

Collateralized:

                

Senior Credit Facility:

                

Revolving credit facility

   $ 600     $ 52,800  

Term loan A facility

     46,500       56,500  

Term loan B facility

     77,000       78,000  

Other notes payable

     117       964  

Unsecured 9.5% senior subordinated notes

     170,000       170,000  

Capital leases

     1,615       2,081  
    


 


       295,832       360,345  

Less current portion

     (14,005 )     (12,299 )
    


 


     $ 281,827     $ 348,046  
    


 


 

Senior Credit Facility:

 

On December 19, 2000, the Company entered into a senior credit facility with JP Morgan Chase Bank, as agent and lender, and other lenders as parties thereto. This senior credit facility was used to finance the acquisition of Taco Cabana, Inc. and to refinance outstanding amounts under the Company’s previous credit facility. The facility provides for total borrowings of $200 million and consists of a $50 million revolving credit facility (including a standby letter of credit facility for up to $20 million), a $70 million term loan A facility and an $80 million term loan B facility.

 

Borrowings under the revolving credit facility may be used to finance permitted acquisitions and new store development, or for working capital and general corporate purposes. The average weighted interest rate on outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility of December 31, 2003 and 2002 was 4.5% and 5.1%, respectively. After reserving $10.2 million for letters of credit guaranteed by the facility, $39.2 million is available for borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

 

Borrowings under the senior credit facility bear interest at a per annum rate, at the Company’s option, of either:

 

  1) the greater of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus .50% plus a margin ranging from .50% to 1.75% for the revolving credit facility and the term loan A facility based on debt to cash flow ratios, and at a fixed margin of 2.5% for the term loan B facility; or

 

  2) LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2% to 3.25% for the revolving credit facility and the term loan A facility based on debt to cash flow ratios, and at a fixed margin of 4% for the term loan B facility.

 

F - 15


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

The revolving credit facility and the term loan A facility expire on December 31, 2005. However, the revolving credit facility is eligible for a one-year extension based upon request and unanimous approval of the lenders. The term loan B facility expires on December 31, 2007. Amounts under the term loan A facility are repayable as follows:

 

  1) an aggregate of $12.5 million payable in four quarterly installments in 2004;

 

  2) an aggregate of $9.4 million payable in three quarterly installments in 2005; and

 

  3) a final payment of $24.6 million payable upon the term loan A facility’s maturity on December 31, 2005.

 

       Amounts under the term loan B facility are repayable as follows:

 

  1) an aggregate of $1.0 million payable in four quarterly installments for each of the years 2004 and 2005;

 

  2) an aggregate of $35.0 million payable in four quarterly installments in 2006;

 

  3) an aggregate of $26.2 million payable in three quarterly installments in 2007; and

 

  4) a final payment of $13.8 million payable upon the term loan B facility’s maturity on December 31, 2007.

 

In general, the Company’s obligations under the senior credit facility are collateralized by all of the Company’s assets, a pledge of the Company’s common stock and the stock of each of the Company’s subsidiaries.

 

Senior Subordinated Notes:

 

The Company also has $170 million of unsecured senior subordinated notes. The senior subordinated notes bear interest at a rate of 9.5% payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 and mature on December 1, 2008. The notes are redeemable at the option of the Company in whole or in part on or after December 1, 2003 at a price of 104.75% of the principal amount if redeemed before December 1, 2004, 103.167% of the principal amount if redeemed after December 1, 2004 but before December 1, 2005, 101.583% of the principal amount if redeemed after December 1, 2005 but before December 1, 2006 and at 100% of the principal amount after December 1, 2006.

 

Restrictive covenants under the senior subordinated notes and the senior credit facility include limitations with respect to the Company’s ability to issue additional debt, incur liens, sell or acquire assets or businesses, pay dividends and make certain investments. The Company was in compliance at December 31, 2003 with the restrictive covenants with the indenture governing the senior subordinated notes. In addition, the senior credit facility requires the Company to meet certain financial ratio tests. As a result of the restatement of the Company’s previously issued financial statements as discussed in Note 2, the Company was in default related to certain required financial leverage ratios and other covenants under its senior secured credit facility. The Company has obtained a waiver from its senior secured lenders of any prior non-compliance and defaults resulting from the restatement. In addition, the Company’s senior credit facility has been amended to exclude all adjustments resulting from this restatement on its financial covenant requirements and to treat on a prospective basis the specified leases as if no restatement or recharacterization has occurred.

 

F - 16


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

Other Notes Payable:

 

The Company, as required by Burger King Corporation, purchased frozen Coke machines in 2001 and 2000 for all of its Burger King restaurants. The Company has financed these purchases under an arrangement with Burger King Corporation and Coca-Cola Financial. These notes are generally for a 39-month term and bear interest at annual interest rates ranging from 8.2% to 9.5%. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, these notes totaled $117 and $964, respectively.

 

At December 31, 2003, principal payments required on all long-term debt are as follows:

 

2004

   $ 14,005

2005

     36,011

2006

     35,360

2007

     40,246

2008

     170,095

Thereafter

     115
    

     $ 295,832
    

 

The weighted average interest rate on all debt for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was 7.2%, 7.3% and 8.5%, respectively.

 

7. Financing Obligations

 

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements the Company’s financial statements as previously reported for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and for the first nine months of 2003 have been restated to account for certain sales of real estate as financing transactions under SFAS No. 98, “Accounting For Leases”, rather than as sale/leaseback transactions as previously reported in the Company’s financial statements.

 

The adjustments in the restated financial statements classify the proceeds from these sales, including gains previously deferred over the related lease terms, as financing obligations on the Company’s balance sheet. Also, the payments under these leases have been reclassified from rent expense to payments of interest and principal on the underlying financing obligations.

 

These leases generally contain an initial term of twenty years plus renewal options. The rent payable under such leases includes a minimum rent provision and, in some cases, includes a percentage of sales provision. These leases also require payment of property taxes, insurance and utilities.

 

At December 31, 2003, payments required on financing obligations are as follows:

 

2004

   $ 9,365  

2005

     9,459  

2006

     9,560  

2007

     9,675  

2008

     10,058  

Thereafter, through 2020

     105,561  
    


Total payments

     153,678  

Less amount representing interest

     (68,993 )
    


Total financing obligation

     84,685  

Less current portion

     (2,288 )
    


Long-term financing obligations

   $ 82,397  
    


 

The interest rates on financing obligations range from 7.2% to 10.2%.

 

8. Other Expense

 

During the fourth quarter of 2001, management made the decision to close seven Taco Cabana restaurants in the Phoenix, Arizona market and discontinue restaurant development underway in that market. This decision resulted in a charge to other expense of $8.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2001, comprised of $7.1 million in asset impairments, primarily leasehold improvements, $1.0 million in future occupancy costs and $0.7 million in other exit costs estimated to be incurred over a two-year period. The Company closed one restaurant in December 2001 and the remaining six restaurants in February 2002. For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, these restaurants had net sales of $0.4 million and $3.9 million, respectively, with losses before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization of $0.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively. At December 31, 2003, the Company had $0.6 million in lease liability reserves and $0.3 million in other exit cost reserves related to these restaurants.

 

F - 17


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

9. Income Taxes

 

The income tax provision was comprised of the following for the years ended December 31:

 

     2003

   

2002

As Restated

Note 2


   

2001

As Restated

Note 2


 

Current:

                        

Federal

   $ 1,405     $ (591 )   $ 493  

Foreign

     279       272       283  

State

     214       359       912  
    


 


 


       1,898       40       1,688  
    


 


 


Deferred (prepaid):

                        

Federal

     (405 )     5,699       (1,164 )

State

     274       (146 )     (250 )
    


 


 


       (131 )     5,553       (1,414 )
    


 


 


     $ 1,767     $ 5,593     $ 274  
    


 


 


 

The components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities at December 31, are as follows:

 

     2003

   

2002

As Restated

Note 2


 

Current deferred tax assets:

                

Accounts receivable and other reserves

   $ 249     $ 277  

Accrued vacation benefits

     1,533       1,376  

Other accruals

     2,695       1,990  

Net operating loss carryforwards

     1,809       5,811  
    


 


Total current deferred tax assets

     6,286       9,454  
    


 


Long term deferred tax assets/(liabilities):

                

Deferred income on sale/leaseback of certain real estate

     10,213       6,768  

Postretirement benefit expenses

     1,189       1,014  

Property and equipment depreciation

     (13,072 )     (11,854 )

Net operating loss carryforwards

     926       1,519  

Amortization of intangible assets

     (5,768 )     (4,737 )

Occupancy costs

     4,838       4,936  

Tax credit carryforwards

     6,203       4,449  

Unearned purchase discounts

     3,442       2,561  

Other

     648       665  
    


 


Total long-term net deferred tax assets

     8,619       5,321  
    


 


Total net deferred tax assets

   $ 14,905     $ 14,775  
    


 


 

F - 18


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

The Company has net operating loss carryforwards for Federal income tax purposes of approximately $5.3 million at December 31, 2003 that are not limited to their utilization. The net operating loss carryforwards expire in varying amounts beginning in 2014 through 2023. In addition, the Company has available Federal alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of $3.7 million with no expiration date and Federal Work Opportunity tax credit carryforwards of $2.6 million that begin to expire in 2018.

 

Realization of the deferred income tax assets relating to net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of these carryforwards. Based upon results of operations, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient future taxable income to fully realize the benefit of deferred tax assets, although there can be no assurance of this.

 

A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, is as follows:

 

     2003

   

2002

As Restated

Note 2


   

2001

As Restated

Note 2


 

Statutory federal income tax rate

   $ 1,400      33.9 %   $ 5,239      34.1 %   $ (1,971 )    (34.0 )%

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

     335      8.1       154      1.0       268      4.6  

Non-deductible expenses

     359      8.7       305      2.0       1,982      34.2  

Foreign taxes

     279      6.7       273      1.8       284      4.9  

Employment tax credits

     (354 )    (8.6 )     (202 )    (1.3 )     (190 )    (3.3 )

Deferred revaluation

     (176 )    (4.3 )     —        —         —        —    

Miscellaneous

     (76 )    (1.8 )     (176 )    (1.1 )     (99 )    (1.7 )
    


  

 


  

 


  

     $ 1,767      42.7 %   $ 5,593      36.5 %   $ 274      4.7 %
    


  

 


  

 


  

 

In 2003 and 2002 non-deductible expenses consist primarily of the amortization of certain franchise rights. In 2001 non-deductible expenses also include the amortization of non-deductible goodwill.

 

10. Stockholder’s Equity

 

The Company. The Company has 1,000 shares of common stock authorized of which 10 shares are issued and outstanding. The Company is 100% owned by Holdings. Dividends on the Company’s common stock are restricted to amounts permitted by various loan agreements and the indenture entered into with respect to the senior subordinated notes.

 

Holdings. Holdings’ Restated Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the following: (1) 7,000,000 shares of common stock; and, (2) 100,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.01. Holdings’ Restated Certificate of Incorporation was amended in 2001 when its stockholders approved and adopted a resolution that increased Holdings’ authorized common stock from 5,000,000 shares to 7,000,000 shares.

 

F - 19


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

Holdings’ common stock has been designated to consist of three series comprised of 3,000,000 shares of Carrols Stock, par value $0.01 per share, 2,000,000 shares of Pollo Tropical Stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 2,000,000 shares of Taco Cabana Stock, par value $0.01 per share. The holders of the Carrols Stock have exclusive voting rights; no holders of the Pollo Tropical Stock or the Taco Cabana Stock will have voting rights, except as may be required pursuant to Delaware law. Of the 7,000,000 common shares authorized, 1,144,144 shares of Holdings’ Carrols class of common stock are issued and outstanding.

 

The Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana classes of Holdings’ stock are considered tracking stocks, which is a class of stock intended to track the separate performance of the Company’s Pollo Tropical division and Taco Cabana division, respectively. This tracking stock was adopted as a separate series of equity securities in order to provide a framework for structuring employee incentive plans and to tie such incentives to the business results and performance of those divisions.

 

The number of shares of Pollo Tropical stock that initially represents 100% of the common stockholders’ equity of Holdings attributable to the Pollo Tropical Group, was established at 1,000,000 shares by the Board of Directors. Of the 1,000,000 shares that are issuable, none have been issued, and 100,000 have been reserved for grants under the 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan, which is a Holdings stock option plan.

 

The number of shares of Taco Cabana stock that initially represents 100% of the common stockholders’ equity in Holdings attributable to the Taco Cabana Group was established at 10,000,000 shares by the Board of Directors. Of the 10,000,000 shares that are issuable, none have been issued, and 500,000 have been reserved for grants under the 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan, which is a Holdings stock option plan.

 

The Carrols class of Holdings’ stock consists of the interest of Holdings in all of its assets, liabilities and businesses, other than the assets, liabilities and businesses attributed to the Pollo Tropical Group or Taco Cabana Group. Until the issuance of any Pollo Tropical or Taco Cabana Stock, the rights, preferences and liabilities of the Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana Stock will be retained by Holdings. To the extent that less than 100% of the authorized shares of Pollo Tropical or Taco Cabana Stock are issued, the rights, preferences, assets and liabilities of the shares not issued remain with Holdings and its existing Carrols class stockholders.

 

Stock Options for Carrols Class Stock. In 1996, Holdings adopted a stock option plan entitled the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“1996 Plan”) and authorized a total of 106,250 shares. The number of shares reserved and authorized under this plan was increased to 111,250 in 2001 and to 189,325 in 2002. Options under this plan generally vest over a four-year period. In 1998, Holdings adopted the 1998 Directors’ Stock Option Plan (“1998 Directors’ Plan”) authorizing to grant up to 10,000 options to non-employee Directors. Options under this plan are exercisable over four years. In addition, in conjunction with the 1997 sale of Holdings common stock to Madison Dearborn, additional options not part of the 1996 Plan for 32,427 shares at a price of $101.76 were granted with vesting over a five-year period. As a result of the adoption of the Pollo Tropical tracking stock, the stock options under these plans were redesignated as options of Holdings’ Carrols class common stock. On February 26, 2003, the Carrols Holdings’ Compensation Committee extended the expiration date to February 29, 2012 for the Non Plan options and the 1996 Plan options, granted prior to March 1, 2002, for all executive officers and certain other officers of the Company.

 

F - 20


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

Stock Options for Pollo Tropical Tracking Stock. Holdings has also adopted the 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan (“1998 Pollo Plan”) authorizing to grant up to 100,000 shares of Holdings’ Pollo Tropical class of common stock. Options under this plan generally vest over a five-year period.

 

Stock Options for Taco Cabana Tracking Stock. Holdings has also adopted the 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2001 Taco Plan”) authorizing to grant up to 500,000 shares of Holdings’ Taco Cabana class of common stock. Options under this plan generally vest over a five-year period.

 

A summary of all option activity under Holdings’ stock option plans for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was as follows:

 

    

NonPlan

Options


  

1996

Plan


   

Directors

Plan


  

Pollo

Plan


   

Taco

Plan


 

Outstanding at December 31, 2000

     32,427      104,698       2,000      82,000       —    

Granted

     —        5,880       500      —         201,000  

Canceled

     —        (1,399 )     —        (3,750 )     (6,000 )
    

  


 

  


 


Outstanding at December 31, 2001

     32,427      109,179       2,500      78,250       195,000  

Granted

     —        71,435       500      7,700       132,000  

Canceled

     —        (511 )     —        (1,875 )     (21,000 )
    

  


 

  


 


Outstanding at December 31, 2002

     32,427      180,103       3,000      84,075       306,000  

Granted

     —        5,250       500      6,900       99,500  

Cancelled

     —        (1,705 )     —        (200 )     (71,500 )
    

  


 

  


 


Outstanding at December 31, 2003

     32,427      183,648       3,500      90,775       334,000  
    

  


 

  


 


Grant Prices (in whole dollars):

                                      

2001

   $ —      $ 113.00     $ 113.00    $ —       $ 11.50  

2002

     —        113.00       113.00      153.00       12.50  

2003

     —        124.00       124.00      164.00       14.25  

Average Option Price (in whole dollars):

                                      

At December 31, 2001

   $ 101.76    $ 107.51     $ 116.60    $ 96.60     $ 11.50  

At December 31, 2002

     101.76      109.65       116.00      101.66       11.92  

At December 31, 3003

     101.76      110.00       117.14      106.29       12.59  

Options Exercisable:

                                      

At December 31, 2001

     25,943      99,678       1,750      48,550       39,000  

At December 31, 2002

     32,427      170,725       2,250      62,065       96,600  

At December 31, 2003

     32,427      175,426       2,750      77,480       141,200  

 

F - 21


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

Had compensation cost been determined based upon the fair value of the stock options at grant date consistent with the method of SFAS 123, the Company’s pro-forma net income (loss) would have been $2,111, $8,579 and ($6,379) for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

 

The fair value of each option grant was estimated using the minimum value option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

     2003

   2002

   2001

Risk-free interest rate

   3.17%    4.40%    4.99%

Annual dividend yield

   0%    0%    0%

Expected life

   5 years    5 years    5 years

 

11. Business Segment Information

 

The Company is engaged in the quick-service restaurant industry, with three restaurant concepts: Burger King operating as a franchisee, Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana, both Company owned concepts. The Company’s Burger King restaurants are all located in the United States, primarily in the Northeast, Southeast and Midwest. Pollo Tropical is a regional quick-service restaurant chain featuring grilled marinated chicken and authentic “made from scratch” side dishes. Pollo Tropical’s core markets are located in south and central Florida. Taco Cabana is a regional quick-service restaurant chain featuring Mexican style food, including, flame-grilled beef and chicken fajitas, quesadillas and other Tex-Mex dishes. Taco Cabana’s core markets are primarily in Texas.

 

The “Other” column includes corporate related items not allocated to reportable segments and for income from operations, principally corporate depreciation and amortization. Other identifiable assets consist primarily of franchise rights and intangible assets. Non-operating expenses, comprised of interest expense, interest income, and refinancing expenses and the extraordinary loss are corporate related items and therefore have not been allocated to the reportable segments.

 

F - 22


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

    

Burger

King

Restaurants


  

Pollo

Tropical


  

Taco

Cabana


   Other

    Consolidated

     ($ in thousands)

Year Ended December 31, 2003:

                                   

Revenues

   $ 353,310    $ 110,194    $ 181,481    $ —       $ 644,985

Cost of Sales

     94,360      33,260      53,562      —         181,182

Restaurant wages and related expenses

     113,996      28,105      52,214      —         194,315

Depreciation and amortization

     26,017      4,834      12,222      4,280       47,253

Income from operations

     10,870      17,719      12,189      (4,280 )     36,498

Identifiable assets

     208,008      43,612      72,885      162,369       486,874

Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions

     7,845      4,490      16,505      1,404       30,244

Year Ended December 31, 2002 (as restated):

                                   

Revenues

   $ 380,119    $ 101,497    $ 175,411    $ —       $ 657,027

Cost of sales

     101,851      30,805      51,320      —         183,976

Restaurant wages and related expenses

     118,754      26,497      51,007      —         196,258

Depreciation and amortization

     26,858      4,395      8,406      4,392       44,051

Income from operations

     16,794      17,988      19,872      (4,392 )     50,262

Identifiable assets

     234,503      53,740      91,347      167,798       547,388

Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions

     26,731      9,257      16,749      1,418       54,155

Year Ended December 31, 2001 (as restated):

                                   

Revenues

   $ 380,875    $ 97,611    $ 177,803    $ —       $ 656,289

Cost of sales

     107,054      31,048      51,845      —         189,947

Restaurant wages and related expenses

     117,115      23,961      51,842      —         192,918

Depreciation and amortization

     25,767      4,175      8,923      9,101       47,966

Other expense

     —        —        8,841      —         8,841

Income from operations

     17,452      17,910      8,491      (9,101 )     34,752

Identifiable assets

     238,239      53,584      84,719      175,569       552,111

Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions

     28,992      8,352      8,401      1,830       47,575

 

12. Contingencies

 

On November 16, 1998, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (the “Court”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, against the Company. The complaint alleges that the Company has engaged in a pattern and practice of unlawful discrimination, harassment and retaliation against former and current female employees of the Company over the course of many years. At present, the EEOC has identified approximately 450 individuals it believes represent the class of claimants. The EEOC is seeking monetary and injunctive relief from the Company.

 

F - 23


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

On January 15, 2004, the Company filed a renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”). The Court held oral argument on the Motion on March 12, 2004 and has taken the Motion under submission. It is not possible to predict whether the Company will prevail on the Motion which, subject to possible appeals by the EEOC, would effectively end the case. If the Company does not prevail on the Motion the case will proceed to trial. It is too early to make an evaluation of the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or estimate of the amount or range of potential loss. Consequently, it is not possible to predict what adverse impact, if any, this case could have on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations and cash flows. The Company intends to continue to contest the case vigorously and believe it is without merit.

 

The Company is a party to various other litigation matters incidental to the conduct of its business. The Company does not believe that the outcome of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations and cash flows

 

13. Retirement Plans

 

Prior to July 1, 2002, the Company offered three retirement plans, a savings plan for its salaried Burger King employees (the “Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan”) and 401(k) plans for its Pollo Tropical employees (the “Pollo Tropical 401(k) Plan”) and its Taco Cabana employees (the “Taco Cabana Plan”).

 

Effective July 1, 2002, the Company restated the Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, and the Pollo Tropical 401(k) Plan and the Taco Cabana Plan merged into the Carrols Corporation Plan. Under the restated plan, the Company’s contributions begin to vest after one year and fully vest after five years of service. A year of service is defined as a plan year during which an employee completes at least 1,000 hours of service. The Company’s contributions are equal to 50% of the employee’s contribution to a maximum Company contribution of $520 annually. The plan includes a savings option pursuant to section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code in addition to a post tax savings option. Participating employees may contribute up to 18% of their salary annually to either of the savings options, subject to other limitations. The employees have various investment options available under a trust established by the plan. The Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan expense, including Company contributions, was $471, $468 and $327 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

 

Under the Pollo Tropical 401(k) Plan, all employees who were age 21 or older and who had been credited with at least 1,000 hours of service within 12 consecutive months were eligible to participate in the plan. Employees could contribute up to 15% of their salary on a pre-tax basis, and could self-direct contributions to various investment options. The Company made discretionary matching contributions, which were allocated to participants based on the participant’s eligible deferrals during the plan year. Company contributions vested at a rate of 33% for each year of service. Company contributions to the Pollo Tropical 401(k) Plan totaled $21 and $24 for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

 

F - 24


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

Under the Taco Cabana Plan, all employees who were age 21 or older and who had been credited with at least 1,000 hours of service within 12 consecutive months were eligible to participate in the plan. Employees could contribute up to 15% of their salary on a pre-tax basis and could self-direct contributions to various investment options. During 2000, the plan was modified to include a Company contribution equal to $0.25 for every $1.00 contributed to the plan up to 3% of an employee’s salary. Company contributions vested at a rate of 20% for each year of service. Company contributions to the Taco Cabana Plan totaled $2 and $33 for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

 

14. Postretirement Benefits

 

The Company provides postretirement medical and life insurance benefits covering substantially all Burger King administrative and restaurant management salaried employees. The following is the plan status and accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) at December 31, 2003 and 2002:

 

     2003

    2002

 

Change in benefit obligation:

                

Benefit obligation at beginning of the year

   $ 3,331     $ 2,710  

Service cost

     287       223  

Interest cost

     232       195  

Plan participant’s contributions

     2       2  

Amendments, curtailments, special terminations

     —         —    

Actuarial loss

     610       333  

Benefits paid

     (152 )     (132 )
    


 


Benefit obligation at end of the year

     4,310       3,331  

Change in plan assets:

                

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

     —         —    
    


 


Funded status

     4,310       3,331  

Unrecognized prior service cost

     133       163  

Unrecognized actuarial net loss

     (1,481 )     (909 )
    


 


Accrued benefit cost

   $ 2,962     $ 2,585  
    


 


Weighted average assumptions as of December 31:

                

Discount rate

     6.15 %     6.75 %
    


 


 

F - 25


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

For measurement purposes, the 2003 and 2002 annual rates of increase are assumed to be 8.5% and 9%, respectively, for medical benefits and 12% and 13%, respectively, for prescriptions drug benefits, each rate of increase decreasing gradually to 5% in 2010, and remaining at that level thereafter.

 

     2003

    2002

    2001

 

Components of net periodic benefit cost:

                        

Service cost

   $ 287     $ 223     $ 167  

Interest cost

     232       195       147  

Amortization of gains and losses

     37       18       —    

Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost

     (30 )     (30 )     (30 )
    


 


 


Net periodic postretirement benefit cost

   $ 526     $ 406     $ 284  
    


 


 


 

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A 1% change in the health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:

 

     Increase

   Decrease

 

Effect on total of service and interest cost components

   $ 113    $ (90 )

Effect on postretirement benefit obligation

     811      (660 )

 

F - 26


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

15. Guarantor Financial Statements

 

The $170 million senior subordinated notes of the Company are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s subsidiaries (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”), all of which are wholly-owned by the Company. These subsidiaries are:

 

Carrols Realty Holdings

Carrols Realty I Corp.

Carrols Realty II Corp.

Carrols J.G. Corp.

Quanta Advertising Corp.

Pollo Franchise, Inc.

Pollo Operations, Inc.

Taco Cabana, Inc.

TP Acquisition Corp.

T.C. Management, Inc.

Taco Cabana Management, Inc.

Get Real, Inc.

Texas Taco Cabana, L.P.

 

The following supplemental financial information sets forth on a condensed consolidating basis, consolidating balance sheets, statements of operations and statements of cash flows for the Parent Company only, Guarantor Subsidiaries and for the Company as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.

 

For certain of the Company’s sale/leaseback transactions, Carrols Corporation has guaranteed on an unsecured basis the rental payments of its subsidiaries. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 90-14, “Unsecured Guarantee by Parent of Subsidiary’s Lease Payments in a Sale/Leaseback Transaction”, the Company has included in the following Guarantor Financial Statements amounts pertaining to these leases as if they were accounted for as financing transactions of the Guarantor subsidiaries. These adjustments are eliminated in consolidation.

 

During 2003, the Parent Company entered into an intercompany agreement, retroactive to January 1 2002, to charge interest to the Guarantor Subsidiaries. The retroactive interest recorded in 2003 was $11, 277.

 

F - 27


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

December 31, 2003

(in thousands of dollars)

 

    

Parent

Company

Only


  

Guarantor

Subsidiaries


   

Eliminations


   

Combined

Total


ASSETS                              

Current assets:

                             

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 708    $ 1,706     $ —       $ 2,414

Trade and other receivables, net

     372      908       —         1,280

Inventories

     3,413      1,523       —         4,936

Prepaid rent

     1,309      1,225       —         2,534

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     1,150      2,893       —         4,043

Deferred income taxes

     6,286      —         —         6,286
    

  


 


 

Total current assets

     13,238      8,255       —         21,493

Property and equipment, net

     118,489      142,060       (24,196 )     236,353

Franchise rights, net

     86,148      —         —         86,148

Intangible assets, net

     1,473      123,371       —         124,844

Intercompany receivable (payable)

     147,675      (147,675 )     —         —  

Investment in subsidiaries

     14,206      —         (14,206 )     —  

Deferred income taxes

     8,619      —         —         8,619

Other assets

     6,163      4,601       (1,347 )     9,417
    

  


 


 

Total assets

   $ 396,011    $ 130,612     $ (39,749 )   $ 486,874
    

  


 


 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY                              

Current liabilities:

                             

Accounts payable

   $ 10,918    $ 6,312     $ —       $ 17,230

Accrued interest

     1,549      —         —         1,549

Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits

     6,826      4,719       —         11,545

Other liabilities

     6,757      8,140       —         14,897

Accrued income taxes payable

     836      —         —         836

Current portion of long-term debt

     13,758      247       —         14,005

Current portion of financing obligations

     1,292      1,723       (727 )     2,288
    

  


 


 

Total current liabilities

     41,936      21,141       (727 )     62,350

Long-term debt, net of current portion

     281,176      651       —         281,827

Financing obligations, net of current portion

     29,418      80,290       (27,311 )     82,397

Deferred income, sale/leaseback of real estate

     3,673      2,192       2,976       8,841

Accrued postretirement benefits

     2,962      —         —         2,962

Other liabilities

     15,876      11,621       30       27,527
    

  


 


 

Total liabilities

     375,041      115,895       (25,032 )     465,904

Stockholder’s equity

     20,970      14,717       (14,717 )     20,970
    

  


 


 

Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity

   $ 396,011    $ 130,612     $ (39,749 )   $ 486,874
    

  


 


 

 

F - 28


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

December 31, 2002

(in thousands of dollars)

 

    

Parent

Company

Only


  

Guarantor

Subsidiaries


   

Eliminations


   

Combined

Total

As Restated

Note 2


ASSETS                              

Current assets:

                             

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 715    $ 1,823     $ —       $ 2,538

Trade and other receivables, net

     351      955       —         1,306

Inventories

     3,761      1,479       —         5,240

Prepaid rent

     1,229      998       —         2,227

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     1,539      2,843       —         4,382

Refundable income taxes

     1,253      —         —         1,253

Deferred income taxes

     9,454      —         —         9,454
    

  


 


 

Total current assets

     18,302      8,098       —         26,400

Property and equipment, net

     140,931      151,872       (4,515 )     288,288

Franchise rights, net

     90,620      —         —         90,620

Intangible assets, net

     1,523      123,523       —         125,046

Intercompany receivable (payable)

     171,661      (171,661 )     —         —  

Investment in subsidiaries

     22,293      —         (22,293 )     —  

Deferred income taxes

     5,321      —         —         5,321

Other assets

     7,928      4,012       (227 )     11,713
    

  


 


 

Total assets

   $ 458,579    $ 115,844     $ (27,035 )   $ 547,388
    

  


 


 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY

                             

Current liabilities:

                             

Accounts payable

   $ 10,344    $ 5,755     $ —       $ 16,099

Accrued interest

     1,415      —         —         1,415

Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits

     10,036      5,094       —         15,130

Other liabilities

     6,498      7,917       —         14,415

Current portion of long-term debt

     12,006      293       —         12,299

Current portion of financing obligations

     1,118      1,266       (367 )     2,017
    

  


 


 

Total current liabilities

     41,417      20,325       (367 )     61,375

Long-term debt, net of current portion

     347,151      895       —         348,046

Financing obligations, net of current portion

     30,710      59,104       (5,129 )     84,685

Deferred income, sale/leaseback of real estate

     1,628      146       749       2,523

Accrued postretirement benefits

     2,585      —         —         2,585

Other liabilities

     16,486      13,086       —         29,572
    

  


 


 

Total liabilities

     439,977      93,556       (4,747 )     528,786

Stockholder’s equity (deficit)

     18,602      22,288       (22,288 )     18,602
    

  


 


 

Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity

   $ 458,579    $ 115,844     $ (27,035 )   $ 547,388
    

  


 


 

 

F - 29


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended December 31, 2003

(in thousands of dollars)

 

    

Parent

Company

Only


   

Guarantor

Subsidiaries


   

Eliminations


   

Combined

Total


Revenues:

                              

Restaurant sales

   $ 353,310     $ 290,269     $ —       $ 643,579

Franchise and royalty revenues and fees

     —         1,406       —         1,406
    


 


 


 

Total revenues

     353,310       291,675       —         644,985
    


 


 


 

Costs and expenses:

                              

Cost of sales

     94,360       86,822       —         181,182

Restaurant wages and related expenses

     113,996       80,319       —         194,315

Restaurant rent expense

     20,916       10,467       —         31,383

Other restaurant operating expenses

     52,302       36,268       1,310       89,880

Advertising expense

     14,923       12,428       —         27,351

General and administrative

     20,026       16,292       805       37,123

Depreciation and amortization

     29,284       18,585       (616 )     47,253
    


 


 


 

Total operating expenses

     345,807       261,181       1,499       608,487
    


 


 


 

Income from operations

     7,503       30,494       (1,499 )     36,498

Interest expense

     27,582       5,764       983       32,363

Intercompany allocations

     (29,502 )     29,502       —         —  
    


 


 


 

Income (loss) before income taxes

     9,423       (4,772 )     (516 )     4,135

Provision for income taxes

     (1,033 )     2,800       —         1,767

Equity loss from subsidiaries

     (8,088 )     —         8,088       —  
    


 


 


 

Net income (loss)

   $ 2,368     $ (7,572 )   $ 7,572     $ 2,368
    


 


 


 

 

F - 30


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended December 31, 2002

(in thousands of dollars)

 

    

Parent

Company

Only


   

Guarantor

Subsidiaries


   Eliminations

   

Combined

Total

As Restated

Note 2


Revenues:

                             

Restaurant sales

   $ 380,119     $ 275,426      —       $ 655,545

Franchise and royalty revenues and fees

     —         1,482      —         1,482
    


 

  


 

Total revenues

     380,119       276,908      —         657,027
    


 

  


 

Costs and expenses:

                             

Cost of sales

     101,851       82,125      —         183,976

Restaurant wages and related expenses

     118,754       77,504      —         196,258

Restaurant rent expense

     22,155       8,339      —         30,494

Other restaurant operating expenses

     54,547       32,773      15       87,335

Advertising expense

     16,831       11,210      —         28,041

General and administrative

     22,329       14,281      —         36,610

Depreciation and amortization

     30,126       13,933      (8 )     44,051
    


 

  


 

Total operating expenses

     366,593       240,165      7       606,765
    


 

  


 

Income from operations

     13,526       36,743      (7 )     50,262

Interest expense

     30,026       4,941      (12 )     34,955

Intercompany allocations

     (6,944 )     6,944      —         —  
    


 

  


 

Income (loss) before income taxes

     (9,556 )     24,858      5       15,307

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

     (3,841 )     9,434      —         5,593

Equity income from subsidiaries

     15,429       —        (15,429 )     —  
    


 

  


 

Net income (loss)

   $ 9,714     $ 15,424    $ (15,424 )   $ 9,714
    


 

  


 

 

F - 31


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended December 31, 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

    

Parent

Company

Only


   

Guarantor

Subsidiaries


   Eliminations

   

Combined

Total

As Restated

Note 2


 

Revenues:

                               

Restaurant sales

   $ 380,875     $ 273,835      —       $ 654,710  

Franchise royalty revenues and fees

     —         1,579      —         1,579  
    


 

  


 


Total revenues

     380,875       275,414      —         656,289  
    


 

  


 


Costs and expenses:

                               

Cost of sales

     107,054       82,893      —         189,947  

Restaurant wages and related expenses

     117,115       75,803      —         192,918  

Restaurant rent expense

     22,380       8,827      —         31,207  

Other restaurant operating expenses

     54,289       32,146      —         86,435  

Advertising expense

     16,236       12,594      —         28,830  

General and administrative

     20,582       14,811      —         35,393  

Depreciation and amortization

     28,894       19,072      —         47,966  

Other expense

     —         8,841      —         8,841  
    


 

  


 


Total operating expenses

     366,550       254,987      —         621,537  
    


 

  


 


Income from operations

     14,325       20,427      —         34,752  

Interest expense

     35,282       5,270      —         40,552  

Intercompany allocations

     (6,947 )     6,947      —         —    
    


 

  


 


Income (loss) before income taxes

     (14,010 )     8,210      —         (5,800 )

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

     (5,244 )     5,518      —         274  

Equity income from subsidiaries

     2,692       —        (2,692 )     —    
    


 

  


 


Net income (loss)

   $ (6,074 )   $ 2,692    $ (2,692 )   $ (6,074 )
    


 

  


 


 

F - 32


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Year Ended December 31, 2003

(in thousands of dollars)

 

    

Parent

Company

Only


   

Guarantor

Subsidiaries


    Eliminations

   

Combined

Total


 

Cash flows provided from (used for) operating activities:

                                

Net income (loss)

   $ 10,456     $ (7,572 )   $ (516 )   $ 2,368  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided from operating activities:

                                

(Gain)/loss on disposal of property and equipment

     (837 )     (354 )     805       (386 )

Depreciation and amortization

     29,284       18,585       (616 )     47,253  

Deferred income taxes

     (130 )     —         —         (130 )

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

     23,186       (23,991 )     (61 )     (866 )
    


 


 


 


Net cash provided from (used for) operating activities

     61,959       (13,332 )     (388 )     48,239  
    


 


 


 


Cash flow used for investing activities:

                                

Capital expenditures:

                                

New restaurant development

     (2,631 )     (15,967 )     —         (18,598 )

Restaurant remodeling

     (3,170 )     (147 )     —         (3,317 )

Other restaurant expenditures

     (2,044 )     (4,881 )     —         (6,925 )

Corporate information systems

     (850 )     (554 )     —         (1,404 )
    


 


 


 


Total capital expenditures

     (8,695 )     (21,549 )     —         (30,244 )

Purchased properties for sale/leaseback

     —         (3,149 )     —         (3,149 )

Proceeds from sales of non-operating properties

     1,251       2,670       —         3,921  
    


 


 


 


Net cash used for investing activities

     (7,444 )     (22,028 )     —         (29,472 )
    


 


 


 


Cash flows provided from (used for) financing activities:

                                

Payments from revolving credit facility, net

     (52,200 )     —         —         (52,200 )

Principal payments on term loans

     (11,000 )     —         —         (11,000 )

Principal payments on financing obligations

     (1,118 )     (899 )     —         (2,017 )

Payments on other notes payable, net

     (847 )     —         —         (847 )

Principal payments on capital leases

     (155 )     (291 )     —         (446 )

Proceeds from financing obligations, net

     —         22,542       (22,542 )     —    

Financing costs associated with financing obligation

     —         (1,159 )     1,159       —    

Proceeds from sale/leaseback transactions

     10,872       14,976       21,771       47,619  
    


 


 


 


Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities

     (54,448 )     35,169       388       (18,891 )
    


 


 


 


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     67       (191 )     —         (124 )

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

     715       1,823       —         2,538  
    


 


 


 


Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

   $ 782     $ 1,632     $ —       $ 2,414  
    


 


 


 


 

F - 33


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Year Ended December 31, 2002

(in thousands of dollars)

 

    

Parent

Company

Only


   

Guarantor

Subsidiaries


   

Eliminations


   

Combined

Total

As Restated

Note 2


 

Cash flows provided from operating activities:

                                

Net income (loss)

   $ (5,715 )   $ 15,424     $ 5     $ 9,714  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided from operating activities:

                                

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

     —         24       —         24  

Depreciation and amortization

     30,126       13,933       (8 )     44,051  

Deferred income taxes

     5,553       —         —         5,553  

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

     5,472       (8,848 )     (2 )     (3,378 )
    


 


 


 


Net cash provided from operating activities

     35,436       20,533       (5 )     55,964  
    


 


 


 


Cash flow used for investing activities:

                                

Capital expenditures:

                                

New restaurant development

     (9,113 )     (18,352 )     —         (27,465 )

Restaurant remodeling

     (12,699 )     (3,555 )     —         (16,254 )

Corporate and information systems

     (651 )     (767 )     —         (1,418 )

Other restaurant expenditures

     (4,919 )     (4,099 )     —         (9,018 )
    


 


 


 


Total capital expenditures

     (27,382 )     (26,773 )     —         (54,155 )

Purchased properties for sale/leaseback

     (925 )     —         —         (925 )

Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment

     9       —         —         9  
    


 


 


 


Net cash used for investing activities

     (28,298 )     (26,773 )     —         (55,071 )
    


 


 


 


Cash flows provided from (used for) financing activities:

                                

Proceeds on revolving credit facility, net

     (2,700 )     —         —         (2,700 )

Principal payments on term loans

     (8,500 )     —         —         (8,500 )

Principal payments on financing obligation

     (996 )     (773 )     —         (1,769 )

Proceeds on other notes payable, net

     (978 )     —         —         (978 )

Principal payments on capital leases

     (284 )     (267 )     —         (551 )

Proceeds from financing obligations

     —         5,495       (5,495 )     —    

Financing costs associated with financing obligations

     —         (227 )     227       —    

Proceeds from sale/leaseback transactions

     6,114       2,351       5,273       13,738  
    


 


 


 


Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities

     (7,344 )     6,579       5       (760 )
    


 


 


 


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (206 )     339       —         133  

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

     921       1,484       —         2,405  
    


 


 


 


Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

   $ 715     $ 1,823     $ —       $ 2,538  
    


 


 


 


 

F - 34


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Year Ended December 31, 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

    

Parent

Company

Only


   

Guarantor

Subsidiaries


   

Combined

Total

As Restated

Note 2


 

Cash flows provided from operating activities:

                        

Net income (loss)

   $ (8,766 )   $ 2,692     $ (6,074 )

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided from operating activities:

                        

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

     —         390       390  

Other expense (Note 6)

     —         7,053       7,053  

Depreciation and amortization

     28,894       19,072       47,966  

Deferred income taxes

     (1,688 )     —         (1,688 )

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

     11,445       (11,124 )     321  
    


 


 


Net cash provided from operating activities

     29,885       18,083       47,968  
    


 


 


Cash flow used for investing activities:

                        

Capital expenditures:

                        

New restaurant development

     (3,163 )     (11,362 )     (14,525 )

Restaurant remodeling

     (21,895 )     —         (21,895 )

Corporate and restaurant information systems

     (1,007 )     (445 )     (1,452 )

Other restaurant expenditures

     (3,923 )     (5,780 )     (9,703 )

Acquisition of Burger King restaurants

     (1,612 )     —         (1,612 )
    


 


 


Total capital expenditures

     (31,600 )     (17,587 )     (49,187 )

Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment

     31       —         31  
    


 


 


Net cash used for investing activities

     (31,569 )     (17,587 )     (49,156 )
    


 


 


Cash flows provided from (used for) financing activities:

                        

Proceeds on revolving credit facility, net

     9,900       —         9,900  

Principal payments and retirements of term loans

     (7,000 )     —         (7,000 )

Principal payments on financing obligations

     (836 )     (697 )     (1,533 )

Proceeds from other notes payable, net

     127       —         127  

Principal payments on capital leases

     (282 )     (242 )     (524 )

Financing costs associated with issuance of debt

     (89 )     —         (89 )
    


 


 


Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities

     1,820       (939 )     881  
    


 


 


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     136       (443 )     (307 )

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

     785       1,927       2,712  
    


 


 


Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

   $ 921     $ 1,484     $ 2,405  
    


 


 


 

F - 35


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

Note 16.  Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) (1)

 

    Quarter Ended

 

2003


  March 31

    June 30

  September 30

    December 31

 
    As
Previously
Reported


    As
Restated


    As
Previously
Reported


  As
Restated


  As
Previously
Reported


  As
Restated


             

Total revenues

  $ 152,240     $ 152,240     $ 165,621   $ 165,621   $ 166,195   $ 166,195             $ 160,929  

Gross profit (2)

    26,312       26,312       32,738     32,738     32,208     32,208               29,616  

Net income (loss)

    (935 )     (1,340 )     2,721     2,323     1,187     795               590  
    Quarter Ended

 

2002


  March 31

    June 30

  September 30

    December 31

 
    As
Previously
Reported


    As
Restated


    As
Previously
Reported


  As
Restated


  As
Previously
Reported


  As
Restated


    As
Previously
Reported


    As
Restated


 

Total revenues

  $ 157,807     $ 157,807     $ 173,373   $ 173,373   $ 167,580   $ 167,580     $ 158,267     $ 158,267  

Gross profit (2)

    29,965       29,965       37,347     37,347     32,954     32,954       30,657       30,657  

Net income

    736       249       5,305     4,825     3,190     2,720       2,373       1,920  
    Quarter Ended

 

2001


  March 31

    June 30

  September 30

    December 31 (3)

 
    As
Previously
Reported


    As
Restated


    As
Previously
Reported


  As
Restated


  As
Previously
Reported


  As
Restated


    As
Previously
Reported


    As
Restated


 

Total revenues

  $ 155,112     $ 155,112     $ 167,037   $ 167,037   $ 170,531   $ 170,531     $ 163,609     $ 163,609  

Gross profit (2)

    27,938       27,938       34,198     34,198     32,324     32,324       32,492       32,492  

Net income (loss)

    (1,532 )     (2,068 )     1,856     1,326     420     (105 )     (4,708 )     (5,227 )

(1) See Note 2 regarding the restatement of previously issued financial statements.
(2) Gross profit is defined as total revenues less cost of sales, restaurant wages and related expenses, other restaurant operating expenses and advertising expenses.
(3) Fourth quarter of 2001 includes a charge to other expense of $8.8 million to close seven Taco Cabana restaurants in its Phoenix, Arizona market and discontinue any further restaurant development in that market.

 

F - 36


CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

 

Col. A


   Col. B

   Col. C

   Col. D

    Col. E

Description


  

Balance at

Beginning

of Period


  

Charged

to Costs

and

Expenses


   Deductions

   

Balance

at End
of
Period


Year ended December 31, 2003:

                            

Reserve for doubtful trade accounts receivable

   $ 128    $ —      $ (34 )(c)   $ 94

Reserve for note receivable (a)

     —        —        —         —  

Reserve for inventory (b)

     108      —        (102 )     6

Year ended December 31, 2002:

                            

Reserve for doubtful trade accounts receivable

   $ 128    $ —      $ —       $ 128

Reserve for note receivable (a)

     238      —        (238 )     —  

Reserve for inventory (b)

     82      82      (56 )     108

Year ended December 31, 2001:

                            

Reserve for doubtful trade accounts receivable

   $ 130    $ 31    $ (33 )(c)   $ 128

Reserve for note receivable (a)

     238      —        —         238

Reserve for inventory (b)

     150      12      (80 )     82

(a) Included in other assets.
(b) Included in inventory.
(c) Represents write-offs of accounts.

 

F - 37


SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on the 6th day of May 2004.

 

CARROLS CORPORATION

By:

 

/s/ Alan Vituli


    Alan Vituli,
   

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature


  

Title


 

Date


/s/ Alan Vituli


Alan Vituli

  

Director, Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer

  May 6, 2004

/s/ Daniel T. Accordino


Daniel T. Accordino

  

President, Chief Operating Officer and Director

  May 6, 2004

/s/ Paul R. Flanders


Paul R. Flanders

  

Vice President – Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

  May 6, 2004

/s/ Timothy J. LaLonde


Timothy J. LaLonde

  

Vice President – Controller

  May 6, 2004

/s/ Benjamin D. Chereskin


Benjamin D. Chereskin

  

Director

  May 6, 2004

/s/ Robin P. Selati


Robin P. Selati

  

Director

  May 6, 2004

/s/ Clayton E. Wilhite


Clayton E. Wilhite

  

Director

  May 6, 2004

Brian F. Gleason

  

Director

  May 6, 2004

Olaseni Adeyemi Sonuga

  

Director

  May 6, 2004

Exhibit 4.6

 

1 ST AMENDMENT TO CARROLS HOLDINGS CORPORATION

STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDMENT, made as of this 14 day of October 2003 by and among Carrols Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P., Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, II L.P. (the “Investors”), BIB Holdings (Bermuda), LTD. (“BIB”, as successor in interest to Atlantic Restaurants, Inc. (“ARI”)), Alan Vituli, (“Vituli”) Daniel T. Accordino (“Accordino”) and Joseph Zirkman (“Zirkman”) (Vituli, Accordino and Zirkman are collectively referred to herein as the “Management Holders”).

 

WHEREAS, the Company, the Investors, BIB and the Management Holders previously entered into a certain Stockholders Agreement dated as of March 27, 1997 (the “Stockholders Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed appointment by BIB of Brian Gleason to the Boards of Directors of the Company and Carrols Corporation (collectively referred to herein as the “Board”), the parties hereto desire to amend certain provisions of the Stockholders Agreement as set forth herein, and

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

  1. All terms and conditions of the Stockholders Agreement other than specifically amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect, and all capitalized terms used herein, and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Stockholders Agreement.

 

  2. All references in the Stockholder’s Agreement to “ARI” shall now be deemed to refer to BIB, as successor in interest to ARI.

 

  3. Section 1(a)(ii)(A) of the Stockholders Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirely and the following new Section 1(a)(ii)(A) is inserted in its place:

 

“(A) subject to paragraph 1(c) below, three representatives designated by the Investors (the “ Investor Directors ); provided that so long as the Investors are entitled to three Investor Directors, the third of such directors shall not be elected to or remain on the Board unless there are three BIB Directors serving on the Board at such time but if and only if BIB is entitled to three BIB Directors at such time;”


  4. Section 1(a)(ii)(B) of the Stockholders Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirely and the following new Section 1(a)(ii)(B) is inserted in its place:

 

“(B) subject to paragraph 1(d) below, three representatives designated by BIB (the “ BIB Directors ); provided that so long as BIB is entitled to three BIB Directors, the third of such directors shall not be elected to or remain on the Board unless there are three Investor Directors serving on the Board at such time (except as otherwise provided in the 1 st Amendment to this Agreement) but if and only if the Investors are entitled to three Investor Directors at such time; and”

 

  5. Notwithstanding anything in the Stockholders Agreement to the contrary, the parties acknowledge and agree that during such time as there are three BIB Directors and only two Investor Directors serving on the Board, neither the Board nor the holders of the Stockholder Shares shall, by their own action fill the vacancy on the Board without the approval of the Investor Directors.

 

  6. Notwithstanding anything in the Stockholders Agreement to the contrary, the parties acknowledge and agree that during such time as there are three Investor Director and only two BIB Directors serving on the Board, neither the Board nor the holders of the Stockholder Shares shall, by their own action fill the vacancy on the Board without the approval of the BIB Directors.

 

  7. Notwithstanding anything in the Stockholders Agreement to the contrary, during such time as there are three BIB Directors and only two Investor Directors serving on the Board, the Investors shall have the right to either: (x) immediately designate a third Investor Director and the Company and the Stockholders shall take all necessary action to effectuate such appointment; or (y) cause the Board to remove the third BIB Director. Upon the removal of the third BIB Director, the Investors and BIB shall each have the right to appoint a third Director solely as provided in Section 1 (a)(ii)(A) and Section 1(a)(ii)(B) of the Stockholders Agreement, respectively. Upon the execution and delivery of this Amendment, BIB will submit the signed but undated resignations from Clayton Wilhite and Brian Gleason each referencing this Amendment, which shall be held by the Company’s General Counsel Joseph Zirkman. Upon written notification from the Investors of their election, under Section 7(y) hereof, to remove the third BIB Director, BIB shall, within 5 days of receipt of such notice, decide whether it elects to remove Mr. Wilhite or Mr. Gleason from the Board and shall notify Mr. Zirkman of its decision. Mr. Zirkman shall release and submit to the Board the resignation of the Board member BIB selects and shall destroy the other resignation. In the event BIB does not make its election within the five-day period, the Board (other than Mr. Gleason and Mr. Wilhite) shall decide whether to remove Mr. Gleason or Mr. Wilhite from the Board. Mr. Zirkman shall release and submit to the Board the resignation of the Board member the Board selects and shall destroy the other resignation.


  8. During the term of the Stockholders Agreement, BIB hereby irrevocably grants to, and appoints, the Investors, and each of them individually, BIB’s proxy and attorney-in-fact (with full power of substitution), for and in its name, place and stead, to vote BIB’s Stockholder Shares, or grant a consent or approval in respect of such Stockholder Shares (whether in person at a meeting or by proxy or by execution of a written consent in lieu of a meeting), for and in favor of a third Investor Director designated by the Investors pursuant to Section 7(x) of this Amendment. BIB hereby affirms that the irrevocable proxy set forth above is given in connection with the execution of this Amendment, and that such irrevocable proxy is coupled with an interest and may under no circumstances be revoked. The irrevocable proxy set forth above shall be applicable solely to the appointment of the third Investor Director in accordance with Section 7(x) above and shall not apply to any other Board member designations by the Investors.

 

  9. The Stockholders, by their execution of this Agreement, approve the appointment of Brian Gleason to the Board as a BIB Director.

 

*    *    *    *

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written.

 

BIB Holdings (Bermuda) Ltd.

By:

 

/s/ Stephen Mallet


Name:

 

S.P. Mallet

Title:

 

Director


Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L. P.

 

By:

  

Madison Dearborn Partners, L. P., its General Partner

By:

  

Madison Dearborn Partners, Inc., its General Partner

    

By:

 

/s/ Benjamin Chereskin


    

Name:

 

Benjamin Chereskin

    

Title:

   

 

Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L. P.

 

By:

  

Madison Dearborn Partners II, L. P., its General Partner

By:

  

Madison Dearborn Partners, Inc., its General Partner

    

By:

 

/s/ Benjamin Chereskin


    

Name:

 

Benjamin Chereskin

    

Title:

   

 

/s/ Alan Vituli


Alan Vituli

/s/ Daniel Accordino


Daniel Accordino

/s/ Joseph Zirkman


Joseph Zirkman

Exhibit 10.35

 

FIRST AMENDMENT

 

TO

 

CARROLS CORPORATION

RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN

 

July 1, 2002 Restatement

 

The Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, established effective January 1, 1979, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002, is hereby further amended, effective as of January 1, 2004, in the following respects:

 

1. Section 6.4 of the Plan is amended to provide as follows:

 

6.4 Amount and Allocation of Matching Contributions

 

Each Employer may, in its discretion, make a Matching Contribution to the Plan for each Contribution Period on behalf of each of its Eligible Employees who has met the allocation requirements for Matching Contributions described in this Article.

 

The amount of any such Matching Contribution with respect to similarly situated Eligible Employees, as determined by the Employer in a non-discriminatory manner, shall be equal to a uniform percentage, determined by the Employer, in its discretion, of the Tax-Deferred and/or After-Tax Contributions made for the Contribution Period by or on behalf of such similarly situated Eligible Employees.

 

2. Section 6.5 of the Plan, Limitation on Contributions Matched, is deleted and subsequent sections renumbered accordingly.

 

3. Section 7.4 of the Plan, the order of withdrawal set forth in the indented portion of the first paragraph, is amended to provide as follows:

 

After-Tax Contributions made by the Participant for the “limitation year”, if any, and the Matching Contributions attributable thereto shall be reduced pro rata.


Tax-Deferred Contributions made by the Participant for the “limitation year” and the Matching Contributions attributable thereto, if any, shall be reduced pro rata.

 

Qualified Nonelective Contributions otherwise allocable to the Participant’s Account for the “limitation year”, if any, shall be reduced.

 

*    *    *

 

EXECUTED at New York City this 11 th day of November, 2003.

 

CARROLS CORPORATION

By:

 

/s/ Joseph A. Zirkman


Title:

 

Vice President-General Counsel and Secretary

Exhibit 10.36

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT

 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT (this “ Amendment ”) is made and entered into as of December 31, 2003 by and among CARROLS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the “ Borrower ”); each of the Lenders which is or may from time to time become a party to the Loan Agreement (as defined below) (individually, a “ Lender ” and, collectively, the “ Lenders ”), BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Syndication Agent, SUNTRUST BANK, ATLANTA, as Documentation Agent, MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY, as Co-Agent, and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, acting as agent for the Lenders (in such capacity, together with its successors in such capacity, the “ Agent ”).

 

RECITALS

 

A. The Borrower, the Lenders and the Agent executed and delivered that certain Loan Agreement dated as of December 19, 2000, as amended by instrument dated as of March 31, 2003. Said Loan Agreement, as amended, is herein called the “ Loan Agreement. ” Any capitalized term used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to it in the Loan Agreement.

 

B. The Borrower, the Lenders and the Agent desire to amend the Loan Agreement in certain respects.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements, representations and warranties herein set forth, and further good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Borrower, the Lenders and the Agent do hereby agree as follows:

 

SECTION 1. Amendments to Loan Agreement .

 

(a) The following new definitions are hereby added to Section 1.1 of the Loan Agreement:

 

Restatement ” means the restatement of the consolidated financial statements of the Borrower for fiscal periods ending prior to December 31, 2003 whereby the Subject Transactions have been recharacterized as financing transactions and the Subject Leases have been recharacterized as financing leases on the consolidated financial statements of the Borrower.

 

Subject Leases ” means the leases for restaurant Properties identified on Exhibit H attached hereto.

 

Subject Transactions ” means the sale/leaseback transactions entered into with respect to the Subject Leases prior to December 31, 2003.


(b) Section 1.2 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

 

1.2 Miscellaneous . The words “hereof,” “herein,” and “hereunder” and words of similar import when used in this Agreement shall refer to this Agreement as a whole and not any particular provision of this Agreement. The term “annualized” as used herein shall mean the multiplication of the applicable amount for any given period by a fraction, the numerator of which is 365 and the denominator of which is the number of days elapsed in such period. This Agreement and the observance, performance and calculation of all covenants hereunder shall be construed as if the Restatement, the recharacterization of the Subject Transactions as financing transactions and the recharacterization of the Subject Leases as financing leases, had not occurred, notwithstanding the effect of the Restatement, including without limitation, treatment of the Subject Transactions as financing transactions and the recharacterization of the Subject Leases as financing leases, in the consolidated financial statements of the Company for future periods. Borrower hereby agrees that in connection with the delivery of Compliance Certificates hereunder it shall provide to the Agent and Lenders a reconciliation from the consolidated financial statements covered by such Compliance Certificate, showing the covenant calculations as if the Restatement, the recharacterization of the Subject Transactions as financing transactions and the recharacterization of the Subject Leases as financing leases had all not occurred and demonstrating compliance with the covenants under this Agreement.

 

(c) Section 7.2(d) of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

 

(d) within 100 days after the beginning of each fiscal year, Borrower’s annual business plan for such fiscal year (including its balance sheet and income and cash flow projections for such fiscal year)

 

(d) A new Exhibit H is hereby added to the Loan Agreement, such new exhibit to be identical to Exhibit H attached hereto.

 

SECTION 2. Waiver of Prior Defaults . Lenders hereby waive any Events of Default which may have occurred prior to the date hereof as a result of the Restatement, the recharacterization of the Subject Transactions as financing transactions and the recharacterization of the Subject Leases as financing leases on the consolidated financial statements of the Borrower. Lenders hereby further waive any Events of Default arising by reason of the delivery of the Annual Audited Financial Statements of Borrower and Carrols Holdings for the fiscal year 2003 and related Compliance Certificate and Borrower’s annual business plan for the fiscal year 2004 after the date required for such delivery; provided, however, that the failure to deliver such Annual Audited Financial Statements and related Compliance Certificate and Borrower’s annual business plan for the fiscal year 2004 to the Agent and the Lenders on or before May 6, 2004 shall constitute an Event of Default under the Loan Agreement,

 

SECTION 3. Ratification . Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Loan Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. None of the rights, title and interests existing and to exist under the Loan Agreement are hereby

 

2


released, diminished or impaired, and the Borrower hereby reaffirms all covenants, representations and warranties in the Loan Agreement.

 

SECTION 4. Expenses . The Borrower shall pay to the Agent all reasonable fees and expenses of its respective legal counsel (pursuant to Section 11.3 of the Loan Agreement) incurred in connection with the execution of this Amendment.

 

SECTION 5. Certifications . The Borrower hereby certifies that except for the Restatement and its effect on the Borrower’s financial statements (a) no material adverse change in the assets, liabilities, financial condition, business or affairs of the Borrower has occurred and (b) after giving effect to this Amendment, no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing or will occur as a result of this Amendment.

 

SECTION 6. Miscellaneous . This Amendment (a) shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Borrower, the Lenders and the Agent and their respective successors, assigns, receivers and trustees; (b) may be modified or amended only by a writing signed by the required parties; (c) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York and the United States of America; (d) may be executed in several counterparts by the parties hereto on separate counterparts, and each counterpart, when so executed and delivered, shall constitute an original agreement, and all such separate counterparts shall constitute but one and the same agreement and (e) together with the other Loan Documents, embodies the entire agreement and understanding between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements, consents and understandings relating to such subject matter. The headings herein shall be accorded no significance in interpreting this Amendment. Upon the execution of this Amendment by the Borrower and the Majority Lenders, the Loan Agreement shall be deemed to be amended and all references to the Loan Agreement shall mean the Loan Agreement, as amended hereby.

 

NOTICE PURSUANT TO TEX. BUS. & COMM. CODE §26.02

 

THE LOAN AGREEMENT, AS AMENDED BY THIS AMENDMENT, AND ALL OTHER LOAN DOCUMENTS EXECUTED BY ANY OF THE PARTIES PRIOR HERETO OR SUBSTANTIALLY CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH CONSTITUTE A WRITTEN LOAN AGREEMENT WHICH REPRESENTS THE FINAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND MAY NOT BE CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE OF PRIOR, CONTEMPORANEOUS OR SUBSEQUENT ORAL AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES. THERE ARE NO UNWRITTEN ORAL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE PARTIES.

 

3


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower, the Lenders and the Agent have caused this Amendment to be signed by their respective duly authorized officers, effective as of the date first above written.

 

Exhibit H – Subject Leases

 

CARROLS CORPORATION,

a Delaware corporation

By:

    /s/    Joseph A. Zirkman
   

Name:

    Joseph A. Zirkman
   

Title:

    Vice President
   


JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, as Agent and as a

Lender

By:   

/s/    William P. Wallace


Name:

  

William P. Wallace


Title:

  

Vice President


 


BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

as Syndication Agent and as a Lender

By:

  

/s/    Jay R. Goldstein


Name:

  

Jay R. Goldstein


Title:

  

Vice President


 


SUNTRUST BANK,

as Documentation Agent and as a Lender

By:   

/s/    Susan M. Hall


Name:   

Susan M. Hall


Title:

  

Managing Director



MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY, as Co-Agent and as a Lender
By:   

/s/    Timothy P. McDevitt


Name:   

Timothy P. McDevitt


Title:

  

Vice President



THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY

By:   

/s/    Laurie Kieta


Name:   

Laurie Kieta


Title:   

Vice President



BSB BANK & TRUST COMPANY

By:   

/s/    C. Patrick O’Neil


Name:   

C. Patrick O’Neil


Title:   

Vice President



GE CAPITAL BUSINESS ASSET FUNDING

By:   

/s/    Todd J. Weiss


Name:   

Todd J. Weiss


Title:   

Authorized Signatory



       

STEIN ROE & FARNHAM CLO I LTD.

       

By:

 

Columbia Management Advisors, Inc. (f/k/a Stein Roe & Farnham Incorporated,

as Portfolio Manager

                By:   

/s/    Brian J. Murphy


                Name:   

Brian J. Murphy


                Title:   

Vice President



SRF 2000, INC.

By:   

/s/    Ann E. Morris


Name:

  

Ann E. Morris


Title:

  

Asst. Vice President


 


INDOSUEZ CAPITAL FUNDING IIA, LIMITED

By:   

Indosuez Capital,

as Portfolio Manager

     By:   /s/    Charles Kobayashi
       
     Name:   Charles Kobayashi
       
     Title:   Principal and Portfolio Manager
       

INDOSUEZ CAPITAL FUNDING VI, LIMITED

By:   

Indosuez Capital,

as Collateral Manager

     By:   /s/    Charles Kobayashi
       
     Name:   Charles Kobayashi
       
     Title:   Principal and Portfolio Manager
       

 


ANTARES CAPITAL CORPORATION

By:    /s/    Tyler W. Lindblad
   
Name:    Tyler W. Lindblad
   
Title:    Director
   

 


ANTARES FUNDING L.P.

By:   

JPMorgan Chase Bank, as trustee of the

Antares Funding Trust created under the

Trust Agreement dated as of November 30, 1999

     By:   /s/    Leslie Hundley
       
     Name:   Leslie Hundley
       
     Title:   AVP
       

 


HELLER FINANCIAL INC.

By:   /s/    Robert M. Kadlick
   
Name:   Robert M. Kadlick
   
Title:   Duly Authorized Signatory
   

 


MARINER CDO 2002, LTD.

By:  

 

/s/    Tyler W. Lindblad

   
Name:  

 

Tyler W. Lindblad

   
Title:  

 

Director

   

 


NOVA CDO 2001, LTD.
By:  

 

/s/    Tyler W. Lindblad

   
Name:  

 

Tyler W. Lindblad

   
Title:  

 

Director

   


RIVIERA FUNDING LLC
By:   /s/    Ann E. Morris
   
Name:   Ann E. Morris
   
Title:   Asst. Vice President
   


The undersigned hereby join in this Amendment to evidence their consent to execution by Borrower of this Amendment, to confirm that each Loan Document now or previously executed by the undersigned applies and shall continue to apply to the Loan Agreement, as amended hereby, to acknowledge that without such consent and confirmation, Lender would not execute this Amendment and to join in the notice pursuant to Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code §26.02 set forth above.

 

CARROLS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, CARROLS REALTY HOLDINGS CORP., a Delaware corporation, and CARROLS REALTY I CORP., a Delaware corporation, POLLO FRANCHISE, INC., a Florida corporation, and POLLO OPERATIONS, INC., a Florida corporation, TACO CABANA, INC., a Delaware corporation, T.C. MANAGEMENT, INC., a Delaware corporation, and TACO CABANA MANAGEMENT, INC., a Texas corporation
By:   /s/    Joseph A. Zirkman
   
    Joseph A. Zirkman, Vice President

TP ACQUISITION CORP.,

a Texas corporation

By:   /s/    Joseph A. Zirkman
   
    Joseph A. Zirkman, President

GET REAL, INC.,

a Delaware corporation

By:   /s/    William E. Myers
   
Name: William E. Myers
Title:    Vice President


TEXAS TACO CABANA, L.P.,

a Texas limited partnership

By:  

Taco Cabana Management, Inc.,

a Texas corporation, General Partner

    By:   /s/    Joseph A. Zirkman
       
        Joseph A. Zirkman, Vice President


EXHIBIT H

 

SALE/LEASEBACK

TRANSACTIONS

 

Carrols Corporation                         
     Syndicator                    
March, 1991    CNL                    

Concept/Rest. #


  

Location Address


   City

   State

   Gross
Proceeds


  

Landlord


BK00209

   298 Smokey Park Dr.    Asheville    NC    824,000    Asheville Joint Venture

BK00305

   164 South Main St.    New City    NY    930,446    CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd.

BK00383

   1514 Erie Blvd. East    Syracuse    NY    844,650    CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd.

BK00386

   110 Bluebell Dr., NW    New
Philadelphia
   OH    827,450    CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd.

BK00396

   2242-2250 South Main St.    Mansfield    OH    875,000    CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd.
                   
    
                    4,301,546     

May, 1991

   CNL                    

BK00203

   205 East Dixon Blvd.    Shelby    NC    842,550    CNL Income Fund IX, Ltd.

BK00355

   15650 Broadway    Maple Heights    OH    818,139    CNL Income Fund IX, Ltd.
                   
    
                    1,660,689     

November, 1991

   CNL                    

BK00215

   1332 Asheville Highway    Hendersonville    NC    793,749    CNL Income Fund X, Ltd.

BK00358

   625 Ridge Rd. East    Irondequoit    NY    921,370    CNL Income Fund X, Ltd.

BK00398

   910 Claremont Ave.    Ashland    OH    844,879    CNL Income Fund X, Ltd.

BK00401

   339 State St.    Watertown    NY    822,441    CNL Income Fund IX, Ltd.
                   
    
                    3,382,439     

July, 1994

   CNL                    

BK00433

   1845 W. State Street    Alliance    OH    691,352    CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd.

January, 1995

   CNL                    

BK00431

   2584 Airport Road    Jackson    OH    888,443    CNL Income Fund IX, Ltd.

March, 1996

   March, 1996 CNL                    

BK00474

   1130 S. Main Street    Bowling
Green
   OH    810,000    M2 Real Estate Holdings, LLC

BK00475

   475 E. Airport Highway    Wauseon    OH    810,000    Ruffini Properties, LLC
                   
    
                    1,620,000     

December, 1996

   CNL                    

BK00230

   2402 Heritage St.    Kinston    NC    875,000    CNL Income Fund XVIII, Ltd.

BK00364

   1575 South Water St.    Kent    OH    875,000    CNL Funding 2000-A, LP

BK00473

   1390 V. Odom Blvd.    Akron    OH    875,000   

CNL Income Fund XIII Ltd. &

CNL Income Fund

                   
    
                    2,625,000     

December, 1997

   FFCA                    


EXHIBIT H

 

SALE/LEASEBACK

TRANSACTIONS

 

BK00223

   Tryon Hills Shopping Center    Raleigh    NC    760,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00229

   979 Highway 70 East    New Bern    NC    875,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00231

   1195 Glenburnie Road    New Bern    NC    800,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00261

   7589 Oswego Road    Liverpool    NY    940,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00273

   700 S. Salina Street    Syracuse    NY    860,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00301

   N. Plank Road    Newburgh    NY    1,090,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00326

   1096 State Route 222    Cortland    NY    731,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00362

   1456 Fourth Street NW    New
Philadelphia
   OH    967,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00389

   1907 Cleveland Road    Wooster    OH    1,100,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00393

   971 Court Street    Medina    OH    894,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00399

   1892 W. Market Street    Akron    OH    915,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00405

   1294 Canton Road    Akron    OH    815,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00479

   14834 State Route 49    Edon    OH    715,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00481

   6190 W. Michigan Ave.    Ypsilanti    MI    890,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00555

   3253 Paxton St.    Harrisburg    PA    919,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation
                   
    
                    13,271,000     

March, 1998

   FFCA                    

BK00236

   917 N. Green St.    Morganton    NC    920,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation

BK00582

   2490 Shawnee Road    Lima    OH    809,000    GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation
                   
    
                    1,729,000     

September, 1998

   CNL                    

PT10008

   4211 N.W. 36th St.    Miami Sprngs    FL    1,818,182    CNL Funding 2000-A, LP

PT10015

   11806 Biscayne Blvd.    Ft. Lauderdale    FL    1,590,909    CNL Funding 2000-A, LP

PT10016

   2390 S. University Dr.    Davie    FL    1,500,000    CNL Net Lease Funding 2001, LP

PT10017

   4331 Lake Worth Rd.    Lake Worth    FL    1,277,273    CNL Net Lease Funding 2001, LP

PT10020

   800 University Dr.    Coral Springs    FL    1,854,545    CNL Net Lease Funding 2001, LP

PT10022

   West S.R. 436    Altamonte    FL    1,181,818    CNL Funding 2000-A, LP

PT10023

   8412 S. Orange Blossom Trail    Orlando    FL    1,181,818    CNL Funding 2000-A, LP

PT10024

   1555 N.W. 87th Ave.    Miami    FL    1,750,000    CNL Funding 2000-A, LP
                          

PT10026

   13998 S.W. 56th St.    Miami    FL    1,227,273    Charaf Investments of Florida
                          

PT10030

   581 N.W. 57th Ave.    Miami    FL    1,318,182    Guillermo Sostchin, Trustee
                          

PT10031

   12961 W. Sunrise Blvd.    Sunrise    FL    1,454,545    CWH Sawgrass, LLC
                          

PT10035

   1819 S. Federal Hwy.    Ft. Lauderdale    FL    1,250,000    CNL Net Lease Funding 2001, LP
                   
    
                    17,404,545     

December, 1998

   CNL                    
                          

PT10009

   2710 S. Dixie Hwy.    Miami    FL    2,045,455    CNL Funding 2000-A, LP

June, 1999

  

FFCA/FINCAR/

US REALTY

                   

BK00580

   3196 Manchester Rd.    Akron    OH    1,152,000    Fincar Property Business Trust


EXHIBIT H

 

SALE/LEASEBACK

TRANSACTIONS

 

BK00584

  90 Campbell Rd.    Schenectady    NY          809,000      Fincar Property Business Trust

BK00585

  851 State Route 97W    Bellville    OH          1,174,000      Fincar Property Business Trust

BK00587

  4620 So. Hurstbourne Highway    Louisville    OH          1,044,000      Fincar Property Business Trust

BK00588

  3007 NYS Route 417 West    Olean    NY          750,000      Fincar Property Business Trust

BK00589

  311 Brenton Way    Shepherdsville    KY          1,004,000      Fincar Property Business Trust

BK00594

  499 State Route 103    Bluffton    OH          1,280,000      Fincar Property Business Trust

BK00595

  7021 Wyoming Ave.    Dearborn    MI          967,000      Fincar Property Business Trust

PT10013

  8299 Pines Blvd.    Pembroke
Pines
   FL          1,284,000      Fincar Property Business Trust

PT10027

  11429 Pines Blvd.    Pembroke
Pines
   FL          1,504,000      Fincar Property Business Trust

PT10040

  5720 Wiles Rd.    Coral Springs    FL          1,109,000      Fincar Property Business Trust

PT10043

  2633 Weston Rd.    Weston    FL          1,374,000      Fincar Property Business Trust

PT10044

  10575 N.W. 41 St.    Miami    FL          1,349,000      Fincar Property Business Trust
                        
      
                         14,800,000       

December, 2000

  CNL                            

TC00102

  2627 NW Loop 410    San Antonio    TX          1,134,473      CNL Income Fund XVI, Ltd.

TC00107

  180 Bitters    San Antonio    TX          952,957      CNL Income Fund XVIII, Ltd.

TC00113

  1533 Pat Booker Rd    Universal City    TX          1,111,783     

CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. and

CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd.

as Tenants in Common

TC00119

  4622 Rittiman    San Antonio    TX          1,247,920      CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd.

TC00122

  8620 Burnet    Austin    TX          1,497,504      CNL Income Fund XVI, Ltd.

TC00128

  12525 N Mopac Expressway    Austin    TX          1,202,541      CNL Income Fund XVII, Ltd.

TC00130

  8030 Culebra    San Antonio    TX          1,429,436      Ashland Joint Venture

TC00136

  6919 Greenville    Dallas    TX          1,220,693      CNL Restaurant Investments II

TC00143

  9220 Gulf Freeway    Houston    TX          1,293,299      CNL Income Fund XV, Ltd.

TC00144

  7501 Bellaire    Houston    TX          1,429,436      CNL Income Fund XV, Ltd.

TC00158

  8213 Marbach    San Antonio    TX          1,370,443      CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd.

TC00159

  15002 FM 1825    Pflugerville    TX          1,474,815      CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd.

TC00160

  4992 FM 3009    Schertz    TX          1,107,246     

CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd.

and CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd.

as Tenants in Common

TC00172

  4903 W Belfort    Houston    TX          1,452,125      CNL Income Fund XVII, Ltd.

TC00174

  2535 Hwy 6 South    Houston    TX          975,647      CNL Income Fund XIII, Ltd.

TC00176

  3819 Red Bluff    Pasadena    TX          975,647      CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd.

TC00177

  2025 E FM 1960 West    Houston    TX          952,957      CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd.

TC00181

  11006 FM 1960    Houston    TX          1,179,852      CNL Income Fund XVIII, Ltd.

TC00182

  373 S Mason    Katy    TX          1,107,246      Katy Joint Venture

TC00195

  2531 E. Pioneer Pkwy    Arlington    TX          1,066,404      Arlington Joint Venture

TC00197

  11779 Plano Rd.    Dallas    TX          1,021,026      CNL Income Fund IX, Ltd.

TC00199

  9705 Manchaca    Austin    TX          1,107,246     

CNL Income Fund X, Ltd.

and CNL Income Fund XVIII, Ltd.

as Co-Tenants

TC00236

  13480 Northwest Freeway    Houston    TX          1,361,367      CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd.

TC00241

  10325 North Freeway    Houston    TX          1,363,637      CNL Income Fund X, Ltd.

TC00248

  1300 N. I-35 East    Denton    TX          1,220,693      CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd.
                        
      
                         30,256,393       

 

Exhibit 10.37

 

CARROLS HOLDINGS CORPORATION

1 st AMENDED AND RESTATED 1998 POLLO TROPICAL LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Carrols Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) previously implemented the Carrols Holdings Corporation 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Prior Plan”) pursuant to which Incentive Stock Options have been granted to employees of the Company. The Company has made certain changes to the Prior Plan and set forth below is the 1 st Amended and Restated 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).

 

1. Purpose

 

The purpose of this Plan is to further the growth and general prosperity of Company by providing long-term incentives to officers and employees of the Company and any Subsidiaries of the Company. The Company intends that the Plan will help attract, retain and motivate officers and key employees of high caliber and good potential and promote the alignment of the Participants’ interests with that of the Company’s shareholders.

 

2. Definitions

 

As used in the Plan, the following words shall have the following meanings:

 

“Affiliate” of a Person other than an individual means any other Person, directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control with such Person or, with respect to any partnership, any partner thereof.

 

Award ” means an award made to a Participant pursuant to the Plan and described in Paragraph 6, including, without limitation, an award of an Incentive Stock Option, Nonqualified Stock Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock, Performance Units, Performance Shares, or Other Stock-Based Awards or any combination of the foregoing.

 

Award Agreement ” means an agreement between the Company and a Participant that sets forth the terms, conditions and limitations applicable to an Award.

 

Board ” means the Board of Directors of the Company as constituted from time to time.

 

Cause ” has the meaning determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable Participant’s Award Agreement.

 

As used in the Plan, the following words shall have the following meanings:

 

Carrols Stock ” means Carrols stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company, which is a series of common stock of the Company.

 

“Certificate of Amendment” means the Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

 

Change of Control ” means:


  (a) The acquisition (other than from the Company) by any person, entity or “group”, within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act, excluding for this purpose any employee benefit plan of the Company or its subsidiaries which acquires beneficial ownership of voting securities of the Company, of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act), of more than 50% of either the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock or the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors; or

 

  (b)(1) Individuals who are elected as members of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “ Incumbent Board ”) pursuant to the terms of the Stockholders Agreement executed in connection with the Stock Purchase Agreement thereto (the “ Stockholders Agreement ”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board; provided that any person becoming a director on or after the effective date of the Stockholders Agreement whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s shareholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board (other than an election or nomination of an individual whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest relating to the election of directors of the Company, as such terms are used in Rule 14a-11 of Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act) shall be for purposes of the Plan, considered as though such person were a member of the Incumbent Board; or

 

  (b)(2) Notwithstanding the foregoing, Paragraph (b)(1) above shall not apply to any change in the Incumbent Board during the period in which the Stockholders Agreement is in effect and a majority of the Board of the Company is designated or otherwise appointed to serve on the Board under the provisions of such Stockholders Agreement; or

 

  (c) Approval and consummation of a reorganization, merger, or consolidation, in each case, with respect to which persons who were the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation do not, immediately thereafter, own more than 50% of the combined voting power entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the reorganized, merged or consolidated company’s then outstanding voting securities, or a liquidation or dissolution of the Company or a Sale of Company or a Sale of the Pollo Tropical Group; or

 

  (d) The Company ceases to own at least 50 percent of the Carrols Corporation.

 

  (e) A Change of Control shall not be deemed to have occurred as a result of any purchase or acquisition of shares of capital stock in the Company by Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and its affiliates, Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P. and its affiliates, Atlantic Restaurants, Inc. and its affiliates, or any combination thereof.

 

“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

 

Committee ” means the Compensation Committee of the Board or, if no Committee shall have been appointed, the full Board.

 

2


Employee ” means any officer or other employee of the Company or any Subsidiary.

 

“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.

 

Fair Market Value ” as of any date:

 

  (a) of Stock shall be deemed to equal: (i) if the Stock is publicly traded, the average of the last reported sales prices of such Stock for ten (10) consecutive trading days as officially reported on the principal trading market on which the Stock is traded ending on the second trading day prior to the date of determination; or (ii) if the Stock is not publicly traded, the value of a Share as determined in good faith by the Committee or the Board of the Company on the advice of its independent auditors; or

 

  (b) of assets other than Stock shall equal such value as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

 

Immediate Family ” means an individual’s spouse and descendants (whether natural or adopted) and any trust or partnership solely for the benefit of the individual and/or the individual’s spouse and/or descendants.

 

Incentive Stock Option ” means an option intended to be and designated as an incentive stock option meeting the requirements of Section 422 of the Code.

 

“Independent Third Party” means any Person who, immediately prior to a contemplated transaction, does not own in exces“ Fair Market Value ” as of any date: s of 5% of the Carrols Stock on a fully-diluted basis (a “5% Owner”); who is not controlling, controlled by or under control with any such 5% Owner and who is not the spouse or descendent (by birth or adoption) of any such 5% Owner or a trust for the benefit of such 5% Owner and/or such other Persons.

 

Nonqualified Stock Option ” means an option that is not intended to be nor designated as an Incentive Stock Option.

 

Other Stock-Based Awards ” means any Award other than a Stock Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock, Performance Unit or Performance Share that is valued by reference to or otherwise based upon the Stock.

 

Participant ” means an Employee who, as of any date, has been granted one or more Awards under the Plan which are still outstanding ( i.e. , have not been exercised, forfeited or terminated).

 

Performance Goals ” means, with respect to any Performance Period, performance goals based on any of the following criteria and established by the Committee prior to the beginning of such Performance Period or performance goals based on any of the following criteria and established by the Committee after the beginning of such Performance Period that meet the requirements to be considered pre-established performance goals under Section 162(m) of the Code: earnings or earnings growth; return on equity, assets or investment; revenues; expenses; stock price; market share; charge-offs; or reductions in non-performing assets or such other performance indicators as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. Such Performance Goals may be particular to an Employee or the division, department, branch, line of business, Subsidiary or other unit in which the Employee works, or may be based on the performance of the Company generally.

 

3


Performance Period ” means (when and if applicable) the period of time designated by the Committee during which Performance Goals will be measured in connection with an Award.

 

“Person” means an individual, a partnership, a corporation, a limited liability company, an association, a joint stock company, a trust, a joint venture, an unincorporated organization and a governmental entity or any department, agency or political subdivision thereof.

 

“Pollo Tropical Group” has the meaning set forth in the Certificate of Amendment.

 

Plan ” means this Carrols Holdings Corporation 1 st Amended and Restated 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time.

 

“Qualified Public Offering” means the sale in an underwritten public offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933 of shares of Carrols Stock resulting in aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of at least $50 million and a price per share of not less than $108.2353 (as such amount is equitably adjusted for subsequent stock splits, stock dividends and recapitalizations).

 

“Sale of the Company” means the sale of the Company to an Independent Third Party or affiliate group of Independent Third Parties pursuant to which such party or parties acquire (a) capital stock of the Company possessing the voting power to elect a majority of the Company’s Board (whether by merger, consolidation or sale or transfer of the Company’s capital stock) or (b) all or substantially all of the Company’s assets determined on a consolidated basis.

 

“Sale of the Pollo Tropical Group” means the sale by the Company of the Pollo Tropical Group to an Independent Third Party or affiliate group of Independent Third Parties pursuant to which such party or parties acquire (a) all or substantially all of the assets of the Pollo Tropical Group determined on a consolidated basis or (b) in the event all of the assets and liabilities of the Pollo Tropical Group are held directly or indirectly by a Subsidiary, capital stock of the Subsidiary possessing the voting power to elect a majority of the Subsidiary’s Board (whether by merger, consolidation or sale or transfer of the Subsidiary’s capital stock).

 

Stock ” or “ Share ” means the series of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company that has been designated as Pollo Tropical Stock under the Certificate of Amendment, which may be authorized but unissued or issued and reacquired.

 

Stock Options ” means the collective reference to Incentive Stock Options and Nonqualified Stock Options.

 

“Subsidiary” means any corporation, other than the Company, in which the Company has at least a fifty percent beneficial ownership interest.

 

3. Administration

 

  (a) The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. None of the members of the Committee shall be eligible to receive Awards under the Plan. Members of the Committee shall be intended to qualify to administer and make Awards under the Plan for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code and Rule 16b-3 (and any other applicable rule) promulgated under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act. The Committee may adopt its own rules or procedures, and the action of a majority of

 

 

4


the Committee, taken at a meeting or taken without a meeting by a writing signed by such majority, shall constitute action by the Committee. The Committee shall have the power and authority to administer, construe and interpret the Plan, to make rules for carrying it out and to make changes in such rules. Any such interpretations, rules, and administration shall be consistent with the basic purposes of the Plan.

 

  (b) The Committee may delegate to the Chief Executive Officer and to other senior officers of the Company its duties under the Plan subject to such conditions and limitations as the Committee shall prescribe; provided, however, that only the Committee may designate and make Awards to Participants who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act and Section 162(m) of the Code.

 

  (c) The Committee may employ attorneys, consultants, accountants, appraisers, brokers or other persons. The Committee, the Company, and the officers and directors of the Company shall be entitled to rely upon the advice, opinions or valuations of any such persons. All actions taken and all interpretations and determinations made by the Committee in good faith shall be final and binding upon all Participants, the Company and all other interested persons. No member of the Committee shall be personally liable for any action, determination or interpretation made in good faith with respect to the Plan or Awards made under the Plan, and all members of the Committee shall be fully protected by the Company with respect to any such action, determination or interpretation.

 

4. Eligibility

 

The Committee, in its discretion, may grant Awards to any Employee, subject to the provisions of the Plan. No Employee shall be entitled as a matter of right to receive an Award, nor shall the grant of an Award entitle an Employee to receive any future Award.

 

5. Award Agreement

 

The terms, conditions and limitations of each Award under the Plan shall be determined by the Committee subject to the limitations provided for in Paragraph 7 below, and shall be set forth in an Award Agreement, in a form approved by the Committee, consistent, however, with the terms of the Plan; provided, however, that such Award Agreement shall contain provisions dealing with the treatment of Awards in the event of the termination, death or disability of a Participant.

 

6. Awards

 

As the Committee may determine, the following types of Awards may be granted under the Plan to eligible Employees, either alone, in combination or on an alternative basis:

 

  (a) Incentive Stock Options : These are options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code to purchase Stock. In addition to other restrictions contained in the Plan, an option granted under this Paragraph 6(a), (i) may not be exercised more than 10 years after the date it is granted, (ii) may not have an option exercise price less

 

5


than the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the date the option is granted, (iii) must otherwise comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Code, and (iv) must be designated as an “Incentive Stock Option” by the Committee. To the extent the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the time the Incentive Stock Option is granted) of the Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options become exercisable for the first time by a Participant during any calendar year under all plans of the Company or any Subsidiary exceeds ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000), such options shall be treated as Nonqualified Stock Options.

 

  (b) Nonqualified Stock Options : These are options to purchase Stock which are not intended to be and are not designated by the Committee as “Incentive Stock Options.” At the time of the Award, the Committee shall determine, and shall have included in the Award Agreement or other Plan rules, the option exercise period, the option exercise price, and such other conditions or restrictions as may be appropriate. In addition to the other restrictions contained in the Plan, an option granted under this Paragraph 6(b), (i) may not be exercised more than 10 years after the date it is granted, and (ii) may not have an option exercise price less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of Stock on the date the option is granted.

 

Payment of the option exercise price for Stock Options granted pursuant to Paragraphs 6(a) and 6(b) shall be made (i) in cash, (ii) by delivering shares of Stock already owned by the Participant which shares of stock shall have been owned by the Participant for at least six months prior to the date of such payment, or (iii) by delivering a promissory note to the Company that is either (A) unsecured and fully recourse against the Participant or (B) nonrecourse with respect to payment of the principal amount thereof, recourse with respect to payment of interest thereon, and secured by the Stock being purchased by such exercise and by other assets having a Fair Market Value equal to not less than forty (40%) percent of the exercise price per share (a “ Nonrecourse Note ”) and, in either event, such note shall mature on the earlier of (x) the expiration date of such Stock Option or (y) the fifth anniversary date and shall bear interest, payable quarterly, at the Federal mid-term rate provided under Section 1274(d) of the Code or (iv) by a combination of any of the foregoing, in accordance with the terms of the Plan, the Award Agreement, and any other applicable guidelines of the Committee. The terms of the Note shall provide that: (i) any dividends received on Stock securing a Note shall be applied toward payment of the principal and accrued interest of the Note; and (ii) the Note shall become immediately due and payable upon the sale of the Stock securing the Note and the proceeds shall be applied to the payment of the unpaid principal balance and accrued interest of the Note.

 

  (c) Stock Appreciation Rights : These are rights that on exercise entitle the holder to receive the excess of (i) the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise over (ii) the Fair Market Value on the date of award or, if connected with a previously issued Stock Option, the Fair Market Value at the time such previously issued Stock Option was granted (the “ base value ”), multiplied by (iii) the number of Shares covered by the rights exercised, as determined by the Committee. A Stock Appreciation Right granted under the Plan may, but need not be, granted in tandem with a Stock Option under Paragraphs 6(a) or 6(b). The Committee, in the Award Agreement or by other Plan rules, may impose such restrictions or conditions on the exercise of Stock Appreciation Rights as it deems appropriate, and may terminate, amend, or suspend such Stock Appreciation Rights at any

 

6


time. No Stock Appreciation Right granted under the Plan may be exercised more than 10 years after the date it is granted.

 

  (d) Restricted Stock : Restricted Stock is Stock delivered to a Participant with or without payment of consideration, subject to such conditions, terms and restrictions (including performance-based or employment-based vesting, forfeiture conditions and transfer restrictions) on the Participant’s right to transfer or sell such Stock. The number of Shares of Restricted Stock and the restrictions or conditions on such Shares shall be determined by the Committee, in the Award Agreement or by other Plan rules, and the certificate for the Restricted Stock shall bear evidence of the restrictions or conditions.

 

  (e) Performance Shares and Performance Units : An Award of Performance Shares or Performance Units shall entitle a Participant to receive Stock or a cash payment specified by the Committee, depending upon the attainment of certain Performance Goals that shall be specified by the Committee, and may relate to the performance of the Company or the Pollo Tropical Group or a combination thereof. At the time an Award of such Shares or units is made, the Committee shall, in the Award Agreement, determine the base value of the Award or specify a formula for determining such value. Other than an Award intended to qualify under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Committee may adjust previously established Performance Goals and other terms and conditions of an Award at any time prior to the determination of the payment amount, to reflect major unforeseen events such as changes in laws, regulations or accounting policies or procedures, mergers, acquisitions or divestitures or extraordinary, unusual or non-recurring items or events.

 

Payment pursuant to an Award of Performance Shares or Performance Units shall be made following the Committee’s determination of the extent to which the performance criteria were satisfied, and shall be made in the form of stock, cash or a combination thereof, as the Committee may determine. Payment shall be made as promptly as practicable following the end of the Performance Period unless deferred subject to such terms and conditions as may be prescribed by the Committee.

 

  (f) Other Stock-Based Awards : Other Stock-Based Awards may be granted to such Employees as the Committee may select, at any time and from time to time as the Committee shall determine. The Committee shall have complete discretion in determining the number of Shares subject to such Awards, the consideration for such Awards and the terms, conditions and limitations pertaining to same including without limitation, restrictions based upon the achievement of specified business objectives, tenure, and other measurements of individual or business performance, and/or restrictions under applicable federal or state securities laws, and conditions under which same will lapse. Such awards may include the issuance of Stock in payments of amounts earned under other incentive compensation plans of the Company. The terms, restrictions and conditions of the Award need not be the same with respect to each Participant.

 

The Committee may, in its sole discretion, direct the Company to issue Shares subject to such restrictive legends and/or stop transfer instructions as the Committee deems appropriate.

 

7


7. Limitations and Conditions

 

  (a) The number of Shares of Pollo Tropical Stock available for Awards under the Plan shall be 100,000 or, if greater, such number of Shares as approved by the Committee. The Shares available for Awards under the Plan will be available for grant at an exercise price per share as determined by the Committee. The number of Shares subject to Awards under the Plan (including, but not limited to, Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights) to any one Participant shall not exceed 75,000 Shares. To the extent that any Award is canceled or forfeited, or terminates, expires, or lapses for any reason, any unissued Shares subject to such Award shall again be available for grant under the Plan.

 

  (b) No Awards shall be made under the Plan beyond ten years after the effective date of the Plan, but the terms of Awards made on or before the expiration thereof may extend beyond such expiration.

 

  (c) Nothing in the Plan shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate any Participant’s employment at any time, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ of the Company or any Subsidiary.

 

  (d) Deferral of Award payouts may be provided for, in the sole discretion of the Committee, subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may specify in the Award Agreements.

 

  (e) Participants shall not have any of the rights or privileges of stockholders of the Company with respect to any Shares purchasable in connection with any Award, unless and until certificates representing such Shares have been issued by the Company to such Participants.

 

  (f) Except as otherwise provided in this Paragraph 7, no Award may be sold, transferred, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and shall be exercisable during a Participant’s lifetime only by the Participant or the Participant’s legal representative. The Participant may, if permitted by the Committee, transfer the Award, other than Incentive Stock Options, without payment of consideration, to a member of Participant’s Immediate Family. Any attempt at assignment, transfer, pledge or disposition of the Award contrary to the provisions hereof or the levy of any execution, attachment or similar process upon the Award other than as expressly permitted in this Paragraph 6 shall be null and void and without effect.

 

  (g) No holder of Shares shall sell, transfer, assign, pledge or otherwise dispose of (whether with or without consideration and whether voluntarily or involuntarily or by operation of law) any interest in the Shares (a “ Transfer ”), except pursuant to a Public Sale or an Approved Sale (an “ Exempt Transfer ”) or pursuant to this Paragraph 7; provided that in no event shall any Transfer of Shares pursuant to this Paragraph 7 be made for any consideration other than cash payable upon consummation of such Transfer or in installments over time. For purposes hereof, “ Public Sale ” means any sale of Shares to the public pursuant to an offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

  (h) Prior to making any Transfer other than an Exempt Transfer, any holder of Shares intending to make such a Transfer (the “ Transferring Stockholder ”) shall deliver

 

 

8


written notice (the “ Sale Notice ”) to the Company. The Sale Notice shall disclose in reasonable detail the identity of the prospective transferee(s), the number of shares to be transferred (the “ Specified Shares ”) and the terms and conditions of the proposed Transfer. No Transferring Stockholder shall consummate any such Transfer until 45 days after the Sale Notice has been delivered to the Company, unless the parties to the Transfer have been finally determined pursuant to this Paragraph 6 prior to the expiration of such 45-day period.

 

  (i) The Company may elect to purchase all (but not less than all) of the Specified Shares upon the same terms and conditions as those set forth in the Sale Notice by delivering a written notice of such election to the Transferring Stockholder within 30 days after the Sale Notice has been delivered to the Company. If the Company has elected to purchase the Specified Shares, the purchase of such Specified Shares shall be consummated as soon as is practicable after the delivery of the election notice to the Transferring Stockholder. If the Company has not elected to purchase all of the Specified Shares, the Transferring Stockholder may transfer the Specified Shares at a price and on terms no more favorable to the transferee(s) thereof than those specified in the Sale Notice. Any Specified Shares not so transferred by the Transferring Stockholder within 30 days shall be reoffered to the Company pursuant to this Paragraph 7 prior to any subsequent Transfer.

 

  (j) The restrictions set forth in this Paragraph 7 shall not apply with respect to any Transfer of Shares by any Person (i) in the case of any individual, pursuant to applicable laws of descent and distributions or among such individual’s Immediate Family or (ii) in the case of a Person other than an individual, among its Affiliates (collectively referred to herein as “ Permitted Transferees ”); provided that the restrictions contained in this Paragraph 7 shall continue to be applicable to the Shares after any such Transfer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no party hereto shall avoid the provisions of the Plan by making one or more transfers to one or more Permitted Transferees and then disposing of all or any portion of such party’s interest in any such Permitted Transferee.

 

  (k) The restrictions on the Transfer of Shares set forth in this Paragraph 7 shall continue with respect to each Share until the date on which such Share has been transferred in a Public Sale or an Approved Sale.

 

  (l) No grant or Award related payout under the Plan shall be deemed compensation for purposes of computing benefits or contributions under any retirement plan of the Company or any Subsidiary and shall not affect any benefits under any other benefit plan of any kind or any benefit plan subsequently instituted under which the availability or amount of benefits is related to level of compensation.

 

  (m) No benefit or promise under the Plan shall be secured by any specific assets of the Company or any Subsidiary, nor shall any assets of the Company or any Subsidiary be designated as attributable or allocated to the satisfaction of the Company’s obligations under the Plan.

 

  (n) Upon the conversion of Shares in connection with a public offering of the Company’s securities, other than a Qualified Public Offering, the Participant must execute, become a party to and agree to be bound by the Company’s Stockholder’s Agreement dated March 27, 1997 by and among the Company, Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P., Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., Atlantic Restaurants, Inc., Alan Vituli and the Management Investors.

 

 

9


8. Option Terms

 

  (a) The exercise period for a Stock Option, including any extension which the Committee may from time to time decide to grant, shall not exceed ten years from the date of grant.

 

  (b) Except as otherwise provided by the Committee, a Stock Option shall become exercisable with respect to 20% of the Shares commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant, with an additional 20% becoming exercisable on each anniversary of the date of grant thereafter; provided, in each case, that the Participant shall have continuously remained in the active employment of the Company, or where appropriate, a Subsidiary.

 

  (c) Except as otherwise provided by the Committee, if a Participant’s employment with the Company, or where appropriate, a Subsidiary terminates, then the Stock Options held by the Participant shall have the vesting and exercise terms as determined by the Committee and provided in the applicable Participant’s Award Agreement.

 

  (d) Except as otherwise provided by the Committee, in the event that a Participant ceases to be employed by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries as a result of the Participant’s termination for Cause (the “ Termination ”), any and all Shares which the Participant has acquired upon the exercise of the Stock Options (the “ Repurchase Shares ”), shall be subject to repurchase (the “ Repurchase Option ”) by the Company as follows:

 

(i) The purchase price for each Repurchase Share shall be the lesser of (1) the exercise price paid for such Repurchase Share (as proportionately adjusted for all subsequent stock splits, stock dividends and other recapitalizations) and (2) the Fair Market Value for such Repurchase Share.

 

(ii) The Board may elect to purchase all or any portion of the Repurchase Shares by delivering written notice (the “ Repurchase Notice ”) to the holder or holders of the Repurchase Shares within 90 days after the Termination. The Repurchase Notice shall set forth the number of Repurchase Shares to be acquired from such holder of Repurchase Shares, the aggregate consideration to be paid therefor and the time and place for the closing of the transaction.

 

(iii) The closing of the purchase of the Repurchase Shares shall take place on the date designated by the Company in the Repurchase Notice, which date shall not be more than 90 days nor less than 5 days after the delivery of such notice; provided, however, that in no event will such date be less than six months from the date of exercise of the Stock Option with respect to the Repurchase Shares. The Company shall pay for the Repurchase Shares by delivery of a check or wire transfer of funds. The Company shall be entitled to receive from the Participant customary representations and warranties regarding the sale of the Repurchase Shares (including representations and warranties regarding good title to such shares, free and clear of any liens or encumbrances).

 

(iv) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Plan, all repurchases of Repurchase Shares by the Company shall be subject to

 

10


applicable restrictions contained in the Delaware General Corporation Law and in the Company’s and its Subsidiaries’ debt and equity financing agreements. If any such restrictions prohibit the repurchase of Repurchase Shares hereunder which the Company is otherwise entitled or required to make, the time periods provided herein shall be suspended, and the Company may make such repurchases as soon as it is permitted to do so under such restrictions.

 

  (a) The Committee may provide that Awards earn dividends or dividend equivalents. Such dividends or dividend equivalents may be paid currently or may be credited to an account established by the Committee under the Plan in the name of the Participant. Any crediting of dividends or dividend equivalents may be subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Committee may establish, including reinvestment in additional Shares or Share equivalents.

 

  (b) In the event that any properties or assets attributed to the Pollo Tropical Group (the “ Pollo Transferred Property ”) are transferred (the “ Pollo Property Transfer ”) to the Carrols Group from the Pollo Tropical Group (other than in connection with (i) a decrease in the Number of Shares Issuable with Respect to the Inter-Group Interest (as defined in the Certificate of Amendment), (ii) a dividend or distribution on shares of Pollo Tropical Stock or (iii) all sale-leaseback transactions with respect to real property of the Pollo Tropical Group consummated prior to December 31, 1998), an amount shall be credited to an account established by the Committee under the Plan in the name of the Participant if the Participant is holding unexercised Stock Options (the “ Individual Account ”) at the time of such Pollo Property Transfer equal to the product of (x) the Fair Value (as defined in the Certificate of Amendment) of the Pollo Transferred Property on the date of such Pollo Property Transfer and (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is equal to the number of Shares issuable upon exercise of the Participant’s unexercised Stock Options, and the denominator of which is equal to (1) the Number of Shares Issuable with Respect to the Inter-Group Interest plus (2) the number of Shares currently outstanding.

 

  (c) In the event that any properties or assets attributed to the Carrols Group (the “ Carrols Transferred Property ”) are transferred (the “ Carrols Property Transfer ”) to the Pollo Tropical Group from the Carrols Group (other than in connection with an increase in the Number of Shares Issuable with Respect to the Inter-Group Interest), an amount shall be deducted from, or debited to, the Individual Account at the time of such Carrols Property Transfer equal to the product of (i) the Fair Value (as defined in the Certificate of Amendment) of the Carrols Transferred Property on the date of such Carrols Property Transfer and (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is equal to the number of Shares issuable upon exercise of a Participant’s unexercised Stock Options, and the denominator of which is equal to (x) the Number of Shares Issuable with Respect to the Inter-Group Interest plus (y) the number of Shares currently outstanding.

 

  (d) The amount (as such amount may be adjusted from time to time pursuant to Paragraphs 9(b) and 9(c), the “ Participant Amount ”) maintained in a Participant’s Individual Account (whether such amount is a positive or negative balance) will be applied (as provided in Paragraph 9(e)) only upon the (i) exchange of a Participant’s Stock Options or (ii) exercise by a Participant of any of his or her Stock Options in the event (x) of a Change of Control, (y) that all of the properties and assets attributed to the Pollo Tropical Group are transferred to a wholly

 

11


owned subsidiary of the Company and the Shares and/or Stock Options are exchanged for shares of the capital stock of such subsidiary and/or options to purchase shares of the capital stock of such subsidiary or (z) of a firm commitment initial public offering relating to the Carrols Stock and the Shares are exchanged for shares of Carrols Stock (each, a “Triggering Event”).

 

  (e) In the event (i) a Participant is entitled to receive consideration (whether in the form of cash, property or other securities) upon the consummation of a Triggering Event (as a result of the exercise of a Participant’s Stock Options) or (ii) a Participant’s Stock Options to purchase Shares are exchanged for options to purchase another security upon the consummation of a Triggering Event, the aggregate value of either the consideration per share to be received by a Participant as a result of such Triggering Event (whether such consideration is payable in cash, property or securities) or the securities underlying the options which are issued or exchanged for a Participant’s Stock Options as a result of such Triggering Event, as the case may be, shall be increased (where the Participant Amount is a positive number) or decreased (where the Participant Amount is a negative number) by an amount equal to the quotient of (x) the Participant Amount and (y) the number of shares issuable upon the exercise of the outstanding Stock Options, less (in the event the Exercise Price is not paid by the Participant) the Exercise Price per share payable upon exercise of such Stock Options.

 

  (f) In the event a Participant’s Stock Options expire or terminate, the Participant Amount shall be either reduced (where the Participant Amount is a positive number) or increased (where the Participant Amount is a negative number), as the case may be, by an amount equal to the product of (1) the Participant Amount and (2) a fraction, the numerator of which is equal to the number of Shares which would have been issuable upon the exercise of such expired or terminated Stock Options, and the denominator of which is equal to the number of Shares issuable upon exercise of all of the Participant’s Stock Options (including for such calculation the Shares which would have been issuable upon the exercise of the expired or terminated Stock Options). Other than as provided in this Paragraph 9, the Participant shall have no rights whatsoever to receive the Participant Amount.

 

10. Transfers and Leaves of Absence

 

For purposes of the Plan, (a) the transfer of a Participant’s employment between the Company and any Subsidiary without an intervening period of separation shall not be deemed a termination of employment, and (b) a Participant who is granted in writing a leave of absence shall be deemed to have remained in the employ of the Company or Subsidiary during such leave of absence; provided, however, that no Awards may be granted to an Employee while absent on such leave.

 

11. Adjustments

 

  (a) In the event that a dividend shall be declared upon shares of Stock that is payable in shares of Stock, the number of shares of Stock then subject to any Award, the number of shares of Stock reserved for issuance in accordance with the provisions of the Plan but not yet covered by an Award and the number of shares set forth in Paragraph 7(a) shall be adjusted by adding to each share the number of shares which would be distributable thereon if such shares had been outstanding on the date fixed for determining the stockholders entitled to receive such dividend.

 

 

12


  (b) In the event that the outstanding shares of Stock shall be changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares of stock or other securities of the Company or of another corporation, whether through reorganization, recapitalization, stock split-up, combination of shares, sale of assets, merger or consolidation, then, there shall be substituted for each share of Stock then subject to any Award, for each share of Stock reserved for issuance in accordance with the provisions of the Plan but not yet covered by an Award and for each share of Stock referred to in Paragraph 7(a), the number and kind of shares of stock or other securities into which each outstanding share of Stock shall be so changed or for which each such share shall be exchanged.

 

  (c) In the event that there shall be any change, other than as specified in this Paragraph 11, in the number or kind of outstanding shares of Stock, or of any stock or other securities into which Stock shall have been changed into, or for which it shall have been exchanged, then, if the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, determine that such change equitably requires an adjustment in the number or kind of shares then subject to any Award, the number or kind of shares reserved for issuance in accordance with the provisions of the Plan but not yet covered by an Award and the number or kind of shares referred to in Paragraph 7(a), such adjustment shall be made by the Committee and shall be effective and binding for all purposes of the Plan and of Awards granted in accordance with the provisions of the Plan.

 

  (d) In the case of any substitution or adjustment in accordance with the provisions of this Paragraph 11, the exercise price payable for each share of Stock issuable under the Stock Option prior to such substitution or adjustment shall be the exercise price for all shares of stock or other securities which shall have been substituted for such share or to which such share shall have been adjusted in accordance with the provisions of this Paragraph 11.

 

  (e) No adjustment or substitution provided for in this Paragraph 11 shall require the Company to sell a fractional share under any Award. Any fractional share resulting from an adjustment or substitution provided for in this Paragraph 11 shall be rounded up to the nearest whole share.

 

12. Change of Control

 

In the event of a Change of Control, any or all Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights still outstanding shall, notwithstanding any contrary terms of the Award Agreement, vest and become exercisable in full on the date of such Change of Control. As soon as practicable but in no event later than thirty (30) days prior to the occurrence of a Change of Control, the Committee shall notify the Participant of such Change of Control. Upon a Change of Control that qualifies as an Approved Sale (as defined in Paragraph 13) in which the outstanding common stock of the Company is converted or exchanged for or becomes a right to receive any cash, property or securities other than Illiquid Consideration (as defined in Paragraph 13), (i) the Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall become exercisable solely for the amount of such cash, property or securities that the Participant would have been entitled to had the Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights been exercised immediately prior to such event; and (ii) the Participant shall be given an opportunity to either (A) exercise any Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights prior to the consummation of the Approved Sale and participate in such sale as a holder of Stock or (B) upon consummation of the Approved Sale, receive in exchange for such Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights consideration equal to the amount determined by multiplying (1) the same amount

 

13


of consideration per share of Stock received by the holders of Stock in connection with the Approved Sale less the exercise price per share of Stock of such Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights to acquire Stock by (2) the number of shares of Stock represented by such Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent the Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights are not exercised prior to or exchanged simultaneously with the consummation of such Approved Sale in accordance with provisions (i) or (ii) herein, the Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall be canceled.

 

13. Sale of the Company or Sale of the Pollo Tropical Group

 

  (a) If (i) the Board and the holders of a majority of the Carrols Stock approve a Sale of the Company or (ii) the Board and, if required by applicable law, the holders of a majority of the Carrols Stock approve a Sale of the Pollo Tropical Group (each an “ Approved Sale ”), the holders of Stock shall, if required by applicable law, consent to and raise no objections against such Approved Sale and if such Approved Sale is structured as a sale of capital stock, the holders of Stock shall agree to sell their Stock on the terms and conditions approved by the Board and, if required, the holders of a majority of the Carrols Stock. The holders of Stock shall take all necessary and desirable actions in connection with the consummation of an Approved Sale of the Company or an Approved Sale of the Pollo Tropical Group. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the consideration to be received by the holders of Stock in connection with an Approved Sale shall include either (x) shares of common stock of a class which is not listed on a national securities exchange or in the NASDAQ system and which is not entitled to registration rights for sale in a registered public offering under the Securities Act of 1933 or (y) shares of senior equity securities which do not provide for a scheduled redemption or a redemption at the option of the holders thereof, such holders shall not be required to sell their shares of Stock pursuant to this Paragraph 13(a) (collectively, the “ Illiquid Consideration ”).

 

  (b) The obligations of the holders of Stock with respect to the Approved Sale of the Company or an Approved Sale of the Pollo Tropical Group is subject to the satisfaction of the condition that, upon the consummation of such Approved Sale, all of the holders of Stock receive the same form and amount of consideration per share of Stock, or if any holders of Stock are given an option as to the form and amount of consideration to be received, all holders be given the same option.

 

  (c) If the Company enters into any negotiation or transaction involving the issuance of securities of another party to the holders of the Company’s securities for which Rule 506 (or any similar rule then in effect), promulgated by the Securities Exchange Commission, may be available with respect to such negotiation or transaction (including a merger, consolidation or other reorganization), the holders of Stock shall at the request of the Company, appoint a “purchaser representative” (as such term is defined in Rule 501) reasonably acceptable to the Company. If any holder of Stock appoints a purchaser representative designated by the Company, the Company shall pay the fees of such purchaser representative. However, if any holder of Stock declines to appoint the purchaser representative designated by the Company, such holder shall appoint another purchaser representative (reasonably acceptable to the Company), and such holder shall be responsible for the fees of the purchaser representative so appointed.

 

 

14


  (d) Participants and the other holders of Stock (if any) shall bear their pro-rata share (based upon the number of shares sold) of the costs of any sale of Stock pursuant to an Approved Sale to the extent such costs are incurred for the benefit of all holders of Stock and are not otherwise paid by the Company or the acquiring party. Costs incurred by Participants and the other holders of Stock on their own behalf shall not be considered costs of the transaction hereunder.

 

  (e) The provisions of this Paragraph 13 shall terminate upon the closing of a Qualified Public Offering.

 

14. Amendment and Termination

 

  (a) The Committee shall have the authority to make such amendments to any terms and conditions applicable to outstanding Awards as are consistent with the Plan provided that, no such action shall modify such Award in a manner adverse to the Participant without the Participant’s consent, except as such modification is provided for or contemplated under the terms of the Award.

 

  (b) The Committee may terminate, amend or modify the provisions of the Plan (including any performance criteria or conditions which must be achieved in order for an Employee to receive an Award or Awards, subject to Paragraph 6(e)) at any time and from time to time; provided, however, that an amendment which requires stockholder approval in order for the Plan to continue to comply with Rule 16b-3, Section 162(m) of the Code or any other law, regulation or stock exchange requirement shall not be effective unless approved by the requisite vote of stockholders. The termination, amendment or modification of the Plan may be in response to changes in the Code, the Exchange Act, national securities exchange regulations or for other reasons deemed appropriate by the Committee.

 

  (c) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in the event that the Committee, in its sole discretion, determines that either (i) the grant of an Award or (ii) the issuance of Stock in connection with an Award hereunder, would result in the Company or any of its Subsidiaries recognizing gain for federal or state income tax purposes, the Committee shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to amend, terminate, suspend or otherwise modify the Plan or any Award hereunder in whole or in part in order to limit or eliminate such adverse tax effect on the Company or any of its Subsidiaries; provided, however, that the Committee shall in good faith use its best efforts to put Participants in substantially the same economic position as they would have been in had the provisions of this subsection not been applicable.

 

15. Foreign Options and Rights

 

The Committee may make Awards to Employees who are subject to the laws of nations other than the United States, which Awards may have terms and conditions that differ from the terms thereof as provided elsewhere in the Plan for the purpose of complying with foreign laws.

 

15


16. Withholding Taxes

 

The Company shall have the right to deduct from any cash payment made under the Plan any federal, state or local income or other taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to such payment. It shall be a condition to the obligation of the Company to deliver Shares upon the exercise of a Stock Option or Stock Appreciation Right, upon payment of Performance Units or Performance Shares, upon delivery of Restricted Stock or upon exercise, settlement or payment of any Other Stock-Based Award, that the Participant pay to the Company such amount as may be requested by the Company for the purpose of satisfying any liability for such withholding taxes.

 

17. Indemnification

 

Each current or former member of the Committee, and of the Board, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company against any loss, cost, liability or expense that may be imposed upon, or reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit or proceeding to which the member may be a party or in which the member may be involved by reason of any action taken or failure to act under the Plan and against and from any and all amounts paid by the member in settlement thereof, with the Company’s approval, or paid by the member in satisfaction of any judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding against the member, provided such member shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before the member undertakes to handle and defend it on his or her own behalf. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which the member may be entitled under the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended or By-laws, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.

 

18. Successors

 

The terms of the Plan shall be binding upon the Company, its successors and assigns and all transferees of Awards and/or Shares hereunder.

 

19. Requirement of Law

 

  (a) The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and to such approval by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.

 

  (b) In the event any provision of the Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of the Plan, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.

 

  (c) To the extent that federal laws do not otherwise control, the Plan and all Award Agreements, shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New York.

 

16


20. Effective Date and Termination Dates

 

The Plan, as amended and restated, shall be effective as of July 20, 1998 and shall terminate ten years later, subject to such earlier termination by the Committee pursuant to Paragraph 14.

 

17

Exhibit 21.1

 

CARROLS CORPORATION

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

Name


   State of Incorporation

Carrols Realty Holdings

   Delaware

Carrols Realty I Corp.

   Delaware

Carrols Realty II Corp.

   Delaware

Carrols J.G. Corp.

   Delaware

Quanta Advertising Corp.

   New York

Carrols Enterprises, Inc.

   Delaware

Pollo Franchise, Inc.

   Florida

Pollo Operations, Inc.

   Florida

Taco Cabana, Inc.

   Delaware

TP Acquisition Corp.

   Texas

T.C. Management, Inc.

   Delaware

Taco Cabana Management, Inc.

   Texas

Get Real, Inc.

   Delaware

Texas Taco Cabana, L.P.

   Texas

Taco Cabana Multistate, Inc.

   Delaware

Taco Cabana Atlanta, Inc.

   Delaware

Colorado Cabana, Inc.

   Colorado

T.C. Lease Holdings III, V and VI, Inc.

   Texas

Cabana Bevco, LLC

   Texas

TC Bevco Management, LC

   Texas

TC Bevco Holdings, LLC

   Texas

TC Bevco, LLC

   Texas

Cabana Beverages, Inc.

   Texas

Two Pesos Liquor Corporation

   Texas

Rosa Beverages, Inc.

   Texas

Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Alan Vituli, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Carrols Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

 

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 6, 2004

     

/s/ Alan Vituli


       

Alan Vituli

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Paul R. Flanders, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Carrols Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

 

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 6, 2004

     

/s/ Paul R. Flanders


       

Paul R. Flanders

Vice President – Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

  (1) The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

  (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Alan Vituli


Alan Vituli

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

May 6, 2004

Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Paul R. Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

  (1) The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

  (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Paul R. Flanders


Paul R. Flanders

Vice President – Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

May 6, 2004