Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

x Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

 

or

 

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the transition period from                      to                      .

 

Commission File Number 0-11733

 

CITY HOLDING COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

West Virginia   55-0619957

(State of other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

25 Gatewater Road

Charleston, West Virginia

  25313
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (304) 769-1100

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class


 

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered:


None   None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $2.50 par value

(Title of class)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes  x  No  ¨

 

The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2004 was $494,353,131. As of February 28, 2005, there were 16,616,207 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding. (Registrant has assumed that all of its executive officers and directors are affiliates. Such assumption shall not be deemed to be conclusive for any other purpose.)

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the annual report to security holders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 are incorporated by reference into Part I, Item 1 and Part II, Items 5, 6, 7, 7A, and 8. Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2005 annual shareholders’ meeting are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14.

 


 

1


Table of Contents

FORM 10-K INDEX

 

          Pages

PART I

         

Item 1.

   Business    3-7

Item 2.

   Properties    8-9

Item 3.

   Legal Proceedings    9

Item 4.

   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders    9

PART II

         

Item 5.

   Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities    9

Item 6.

   Selected Financial Data    9

Item 7.

   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    9

Item 7A.

   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk    9

Item 8.

   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data    9

Item 9.

   Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures    9

Item 9A.

   Controls and Procedures    10

Item 9B.

   Other Information    10

Part III

         

Item 10.

   Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant    10

Item 11.

   Executive Compensation    11

Item 12.

   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management    11

Item 13.

   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions    11

Item 14.

   Principal Accounting Fees and Services    11

Part IV

         

Item 15.

   Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules    11
     Signatures    12-13
     Exhibit Index    14-16

 

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I

 

Item 1 Business

 

City Holding Company (the “Company”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Charleston, West Virginia. The Company conducts its principal activities through its wholly-owned subsidiary, City National Bank of West Virginia (“City National”). Through its network of 56 banking offices in West Virginia (54 offices) and Ohio (2 offices), City National provides credit, deposit, trust, and insurance products and services to its customers. In addition to its branch network, City National’s delivery channels include ATMs, check cards, interactive voice response systems, and internet technology. City National has approximately 7% of the deposit market share in West Virginia, and the Company is the third largest bank holding company headquartered in West Virginia based on deposit size. The Company’s business activities are currently limited to one reportable business segment, which is community banking.

 

No portion of City National’s deposits are derived from a single person or persons, the loss of which could have a material adverse effect on liquidity, capital, or other elements of financial performance. Although no portion of City National’s loan portfolio is concentrated within a single industry or group of related industries, it historically has held residential mortgage loans as a significant portion of its loan portfolio. At December 31, 2004, 57% of the Company’s loan portfolio was categorized as residential mortgage and home equity loans. However, due to the fractionated nature of residential mortgage lending, there is no concentration of credits that would be considered materially detrimental to the Company’s financial position or operating results.

 

The Company’s business is not seasonal and has no foreign sources or applications of funds. There are no anticipated material capital expenditures, or any expected material effects on earnings or the Company’s competitive position as a result of compliance with federal, state and local provisions enacted or adopted relating to environmental protection.

 

Competition

 

As noted previously, the Company’s principal markets are located in West Virginia. The majority of the Company’s banking offices are located in the areas of Charleston, Huntington, Beckley and Martinsburg where there is a significant presence of other financial service providers. In its markets, the Company competes with national, regional, and local community banks for deposit, credit, trust, and insurance customers. In addition to traditional banking organizations, the Company competes with credit unions, finance companies, insurance companies and other financial service providers who are able to provide specialty financial services to targeted customer groups. As further discussed below, changes in laws and regulations enacted in recent years have increased the competitive environment the Company faces to retain and attract customers.

 

Regulation and Supervision

 

Overview : The Company, as a registered bank holding company, and City National, as an insured depository institution, operate in a highly regulated environment and are regularly examined by federal and state regulators. The following description briefly discusses certain provisions of federal and state laws and regulations and the potential impact of such provisions to which the Company and City National are subject. These federal and state laws and regulations are designed to reduce potential loss exposure to the depositors of such depository institutions and to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s insurance fund and are not intended to protect the Company’s security holders. Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the banking industry are frequently raised in Congress, in state legislatures, and before the various bank regulatory agencies. The likelihood and timing of any changes and the impact such changes might have on the Company are impossible to determine with any certainty. A change in applicable laws or regulations, or a change in the way such laws or regulations are interpreted by regulatory agencies or courts, may have a material impact on the business, operations and earnings of the Company. To the extent that the following information describes statutory or regulatory provisions, it is qualified entirely by reference to the particular statutory or regulatory provision.

 

3


Table of Contents

As a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”), the Company is subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve Board. Federal banking laws require a bank holding company to serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary depository institutions and to commit resources to support such institutions in circumstances where it might not do so otherwise. Additionally, the Federal Reserve Board has jurisdiction under the BHCA to approve any bank or nonbank acquisition, merger or consolidation proposed by a bank holding company. The BHCA generally limits the activities of a bank holding company and its subsidiaries to that of banking, managing or controlling banks, or any other activity that is so closely related to banking or to managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. The BHCA also prohibits a bank holding company, with certain exceptions, from acquiring more than 5% of the voting shares of any company and from engaging in any business other than banking or managing or controlling banks. The Federal Reserve Board has by regulation determined that certain activities are closely related to banking within the meaning of the BHCA. These activities include: operating a mortgage company, finance company, credit card company or factoring company; performing certain data processing operations; providing investment and financial advice; and acting as an insurance agent for certain types of credit-related insurance.

 

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“Gramm-Leach”) became law in November 1999. Gramm-Leach established a comprehensive framework to permit affiliations among commercial banks, investment banks, insurance companies, securities firms, and other financial service providers. Gramm-Leach permits qualifying bank holding companies to register with the Federal Reserve Board as “financial holding companies” and allows such companies to engage in a significantly broader range of financial activities than were historically permissible for bank holding companies. Although the Federal Reserve Board provides the principal regulatory supervision of financial services permitted under Gramm-Leach, the Securities and Exchange Commission and state regulators also provide substantial supervisory oversight. In addition to broadening the range of financial services a bank holding company may provide, Gramm-Leach also addressed customer privacy and information sharing issues and set forth certain customer disclosure requirements. The Company has no current plans to petition the Federal Reserve Board for consideration as a financial holding company.

 

The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (“Riegle-Neal”) permits bank holding companies to acquire banks located in any state. Riegle-Neal also allows national banks and state banks with different home states to merge across state lines and allows branch banking across state lines, unless specifically prohibited by state laws.

 

The International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001 (USA “Patriot Act”) was adopted in response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The Patriot Act provides law enforcement with greater powers to investigate terrorism and prevent future terrorist acts. Among the broad-reaching provisions contained in the Patriot Act are several designed to deter terrorists’ ability to launder money in the United States and provide law enforcement with additional powers to investigate how terrorists and terrorist organizations are financed. The Patriot Act creates additional requirements for banks, which were already subject to similar regulations. The Patriot Act authorizes the Secretary of Treasury to require financial institutions to take certain “special measures” when the Secretary suspects that certain transactions or accounts are related to money laundering. These special measures may be ordered when the Secretary suspects that a jurisdiction outside of the United States, a financial institution operating outside of the United States, a class of transactions involving a jurisdiction outside of the United States or certain types of accounts are of “primary money laundering concern.” The special measures include the following: (a) require financial institutions to keep records and report on transactions or accounts at issue; (b) require financial institutions to obtain and retain information related to the beneficial ownership of any account opened or maintained by foreign persons; (c) require financial institutions to identify each customer who is permitted to use a payable-through or correspondent account and obtain certain information from each customer permitted to use the account; and (d) prohibit or impose conditions on the opening or maintaining of correspondent or payable-through accounts. Failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, or to comply with all of the relevant laws or regulations, could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution.

 

4


Table of Contents

Capital Adequacy : Federal banking regulations set forth capital adequacy guidelines, which are used by regulatory authorities to assess the adequacy of capital in examining and supervising a bank holding company and its insured depository institutions. The capital adequacy guidelines generally require bank holding companies to maintain total capital equal to at least 8% of total risk-adjusted assets, with at least one-half of total capital consisting of core capital (i.e., Tier I capital) and the remaining amount consisting of “other” capital-eligible items (i.e., Tier II capital), such as perpetual preferred stock, certain subordinated debt, and, subject to limitations, the allowance for loan losses. Tier I capital generally includes common stockholders’ equity plus, within certain limitations, perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities. For purposes of computing risk-based capital ratios, bank holding companies must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items, calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and City National’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

 

In addition to total and Tier I capital requirements, regulatory authorities also require bank holding companies and insured depository institutions to maintain a minimum leverage capital ratio of 3%. The leverage ratio is determined as the ratio of Tier I capital to total average assets, where average assets exclude goodwill, other intangibles, and other specifically excluded assets. Regulatory authorities have stated that minimum capital ratios are adequate for those institutions that are operationally and financially sound, experiencing solid earnings, have high levels of asset quality and are not experiencing significant growth. The guidelines also provide that banking organizations experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels. In those instances where these criteria are not evident, regulatory authorities expect, and may require, bank holding companies and insured depository institutions to maintain higher than minimum capital levels.

 

Additionally, federal banking laws require regulatory authorities to take “prompt corrective action” with respect to depository institutions that do not satisfy minimum capital requirements. The extent of these powers depends upon whether the institutions in question are “well capitalized”, “adequately capitalized”, “undercapitalized”, “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized”, as such terms are defined under uniform regulations defining such capital levels issued by each of the federal banking agencies. As an example, a depository institution that is not well capitalized is generally prohibited from accepting brokered deposits and offering interest rates on deposits higher than the prevailing rate in its market. Additionally, a depository institution is generally prohibited from making any capital distribution (including payment of a dividend) or paying any management fee to its holding company, may be subject to asset growth limitations and may be required to submit capital restoration plans if the depository institution is considered undercapitalized. The Company’s and City National’s regulatory capital ratios are presented in the following table:

 

     December 31,

 
     2004

    2003

 

City Holding:

            

Tier I Risk-based

   15.47 %   11.93 %

Total

   16.64     13.17  

Tier I Leverage

   10.74     10.04  

City National:

            

Tier I Risk-based

   13.32 %   10.72 %

Total

   14.49     11.95  

Tier I Leverage

   9.25     9.19  

 

5


Table of Contents

Dividends and Other Payments : The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from City National. Dividends from City National are essentially the sole source of cash for the Company. The right of the Company, and shareholders of the Company, to participate in any distribution of the assets or earnings of City National through the payment of such dividends or otherwise is necessarily subject to the prior claims of creditors of City National, except to the extent that claims of the Company in its capacity as a creditor may be recognized. Moreover, there are various legal limitations applicable to the payment of dividends to the Company as well as the payment of dividends by the Company to its shareholders. Under federal law, City National may not, subject to certain limited expectations, make loans or extensions of credit to, or invest in the securities of, or take securities of the Company as collateral for loans to any borrower. City National is also subject to collateral security requirements for any loans or extensions of credit permitted by such exceptions.

 

City National is subject to various statutory restrictions on its ability to pay dividends to the Company. Specifically, the approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) is required prior to the payment of dividends by City National in excess of its earnings retained in the current year plus retained net profits for the preceding two years. The payment of dividends by the Company and City National may also be limited by other factors, such as requirements to maintain adequate capital above regulatory guidelines. The OCC has the authority to prohibit any bank under its jurisdiction from engaging in an unsafe and unsound practice in conducting its business. Depending upon the financial condition of City National, the payment of dividends could be deemed to constitute such an unsafe or unsound practice. The Federal Reserve Board and the OCC have indicated their view that it generally would be an unsafe and unsound practice to pay dividends except out of current operating earnings. The Federal Reserve Board has stated that, as a matter of prudent banking, a bank or bank holding company should not maintain its existing rate of cash dividends on common stock unless (1) the organization’s net income available to common shareholders over the past year has been sufficient to fund fully the dividends and (2) the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition. Moreover, the Federal Reserve Board has indicated that bank holding companies should serve as a source of managerial and financial strength to their subsidiary banks. Accordingly, the Federal Reserve Board has stated that a bank holding company should not maintain a level of cash dividends to its shareholders that places undue pressure on the capital of bank subsidiaries, or that can be funded only through additional borrowings or other arrangements that may undermine the bank holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength.

 

During 2003 and 2004, City National received regulatory approval to pay $123.9 million of cash dividends to the Company, while generating net profits of $97.8 million. Therefore, City National will be required to obtain regulatory approval prior to declaring any cash dividends to the Company throughout 2005. The Company used cash obtained from these dividends primarily to: (1) pay common dividends to stockholders; (2) remit interest payments on the Company’s trust-preferred securities; and (3) fund repurchases of the Company’s common shares. Although regulatory authorities have approved prior cash dividend requests, there can be no assurance that future dividend requests will be approved.

 

Governmental Policies

 

The Federal Reserve Board regulates money and credit and interest rates in order to influence general economic conditions. These policies have a significant influence on overall growth and distribution of bank loans, investments and deposits and affect interest rates charged on loans or paid for time and savings deposits. Federal Reserve monetary policies have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future.

 

Various other legislation, including proposals to overhaul the banking regulatory system and to limit the investments that a depository institution may make with insured funds, are from time to time introduced in Congress. The Company cannot determine the ultimate effect that such potential legislation, if enacted, would have upon its financial condition or operations.

 

6


Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

At December 31, 2004, the executive officers of the Company were as follows:

 

Name


   Age

  

Business Experience


Gerald R. Francis    61    Chairman of the Board, City Holding Company and City National Bank of West Virginia since April 2002. President and Chief Executive Officer, City Holding Company and City National Bank, Charleston, WV since January 2001. Director, City Holding Company and City National Bank of West Virginia, Charleston, WV since June 2001. President and Director, Peoples Bank Corp. of Indianapolis, IN, 1997 - 1999.
Charles R. Hageboeck    42    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, City Holding Company and City National Bank, Charleston, WV since June 2001. Director of Forecasting, Roche Diagnostics Corp. (a medical diagnostic manufacturer), Indianapolis, IN from 2000 - 2001. Chief Financial Officer, Peoples Bank Corp. of Indianapolis, IN from 1995 - 1999.
John A. DeRito    54    Executive Vice President of Commercial Banking, City Holding Company and City National Bank, Charleston, WV since June 2004. Regional Credit Officer for the West Virginia Central Region of BB&T, Charleston, WV from 2000 - 2004. Senior Vice President and Credit Officer, One Valley Bank, Charleston, WV from 1998 - 2000. Vice President and Credit Officer, One Valley Bank, Charleston, WV from 1983 – 1998.
Craig G. Stilwell    49    Executive Vice President of Marketing & Human Resources, City Holding Company and City National Bank, Charleston, WV since May 2001. Olive LLP (a regional accounting and consulting firm specializing in financial institutions), Indianapolis, IN from 1999 - 2001. Senior Vice President, Human Resources & Marketing, Peoples Bank Corp. of Indianapolis, IN from 1978 - 1999.
William L. Butcher    40    Executive Vice President of Retail Banking, City Holding Company and City National Bank, Charleston, WV since April 2001. Senior Vice President of Retail Banking, Fifth Third Bank, Indianapolis, IN from 1999 - 2000. Senior Vice President of Retail Banking, Peoples Bank Corp. of Indianapolis, IN from 1998 - 1999.

 

Effective February 1, 2005, Mr. Francis voluntarily terminated his employment with the Company as President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Francis will continue to serve as the Company’s non-executive Chairman of the Board Directors. The Company named Mr. Hageboeck to succeed Mr. Francis as President and Chief Executive Officer effective February 1, 2005.

 

Effective February 23, 2005, Mr. Butcher and the Company entered into a Joint Agreement of Separation whereby the parties mutually agreed to sever their existing employment relationship. The Company named Mr. Stilwell as Executive Vice President of Retail Banking effective February 23, 2005.

 

Employees

 

The Company had 691 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2004.

 

7


Table of Contents

Available Information

 

The Company’s Internet website address is www.cityholding.com. The Company makes available free of charge through its website its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after such documents are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information on the Company’s website is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a part of this report or incorporated into any other filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of the Company’s annual report will be made available, free of charge, upon written request.

 

Statistical Information

 

The information noted below is provided pursuant to Guide 3 — Statistical Disclosure by Bank Holding Companies. Page references are to the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2004 and such pages have been filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.

 

Description of Information

  

Page

Reference


1.   Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Stockholders’     
    Equity; Interest Rates and Interest Differential     
    a.    Average Balance Sheets    5
    b.    Analysis of Net Interest Earnings    6-7
    c.    Rate Volume Analysis of Changes in Interest Income and Expense    7
2.   Investment Portfolio     
    a.    Book Value of Investments    13
    b.    Maturity Schedule of Investments    13
    c.    Securities of Issuers Exceeding 10% of Stockholders’ Equity    13
3.   Loan Portfolio     
    a.    Types of Loans    14
    b.    Maturities and Sensitivity to Changes in Interest Rates    14
    c.    Risk Elements    17
    d.    Other Interest Bearing Assets    N/A
4.   Summary of Loan Loss Experience    17
5.   Deposits     
    a.    Breakdown of Deposits by Categories, Average Balance and Average Rate Paid    5
    b.    Maturity Schedule of Time Certificates of Deposit and Other Time Deposits of $100,000 or More    20
6.   Return on Equity and Assets    4
7.   Contractual Obligations    20

 

Item 2 Properties

 

City National owns the Company’s executive offices, located at 25 Gatewater Road, Charleston, West Virginia. City National operates 56 branch offices, with 54 offices in West Virginia and two offices in southeastern Ohio. The West Virginia locations are primarily centered in the Charleston, Huntington, Beckley, and Martinsburg markets. City National owns 41 locations and leases 15 locations, pursuant to operating leases. All of the properties are suitable and adequate for their current operations and are generally being fully utilized.

 

8


Table of Contents

City National also owns a thirty thousand square foot office building in an unincorporated area approximately fifteen miles west of Charleston, West Virginia. This facility formally housed loan operations personnel, but has since been vacated. The building is currently being marketed for sale.

 

Item 3 Legal Proceedings

 

On December 31, 2001, the Company, its previous management team, and members of the Boards of Directors of both the Company and City National (the “defendants”) were named in a derivative action filed by a shareholder seeking to recover damages on behalf of the Company. In January 2004, the Company announced that a tentative settlement had been reached in this litigation. Subsequently, the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia, approved the settlement and the Company received insurance proceeds of approximately $5.5 million or $0.19 diluted earnings per share, net of taxes, in April 2004.

 

In addition, the Company is engaged in various legal actions that it deems to be in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes that it has adequately provided for probable costs of current litigation. As these legal actions are resolved, the Company could realize positive and/or negative impact to its financial performance in the period in which these legal actions are ultimately decided. There can be no assurance that current actions will have immaterial results, either positive or negative, or that no material actions may be presented in the future.

 

Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

None.

 

PART II

 

Item 5 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Pages 2 and 41-42 of the Annual Report to Shareholders of City Holding Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in this report as Exhibit 13, are incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 6 Selected Financial Data

 

Selected Financial Data on page 1 of the Annual Report to Shareholders of City Holding Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in this report as Exhibit 13, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on pages 2 through 22 of the Annual Report to Shareholders of City Holding Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in this report as Exhibit 13, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Information appearing under the caption “Risk Management” appearing on page 10 of the Annual Report to Shareholders of City Holding Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in this report as Exhibit 13, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

The consolidated financial statements, notes to consolidated financial statements, reports of management and the independent registered public accounting firm included on pages 23 through 48 of the Annual Report to Shareholders of City Holding Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in this report as Exhibit 13, are incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None

 

9


Table of Contents
Item 9A Controls and Procedures

 

Pursuant to Rule 13a-15b under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

 

  (a) Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting appears on page 23 of the Annual Report to Shareholders of City Holding Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in this report as Exhibit 13, is included herein by reference.

 

  (b) The attestation report of the registered public accounting firm on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting appears on page 24 of the Annual Report to Shareholders of City Holding Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in this report as Exhibit 13, is included herein by reference.

 

  (c) The Company did not have any changes in internal control over financial reporting during its fourth quarter for the year ending December 31, 2004, that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 9B Other Information

 

None

 

PART III

 

Item 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

Information concerning the directors of the Company will appear under the caption “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS” in the Company’s 2005 Proxy Statement that will be filed within 120 days of fiscal year end and is hereby incorporated by reference.

 

Certain information regarding executive officers is included under the section captioned “Executive Officers of The Registrant” in Part I, Item 1, elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Information concerning the Company’s audit committee is included under the caption “AUDIT COMMITTEE” in the Company’s 2005 Proxy Statement that will be filed within 120 days of fiscal year end and is hereby incorporated by reference.

 

Information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 will be provided under the caption “SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE” in the Company’s 2005 Proxy Statement that will be filed within 120 days of fiscal year end and is hereby incorporated by reference.

 

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Company’s chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, and all directors, officers and employees of the Company and has posted such Code of Ethics on its website at www.cityholding.com under the “Corporate Governance” link. A copy of the Company’s Code of Ethics covering all employees will be mailed upon request to Investor Relations, City Holding Company, 25 Gatewater Road, P. O. Box 7520, Charleston, WV 25356-0520. Any amendments to or waivers from any provision of the Code of Ethics applicable to the Company’s chief executive officer, chief financial officer, or chief accounting officer will be disclosed by timely posting such information on the Company’s internet website.

 

10


Table of Contents
Item 11 Executive Compensation

 

The information required by Item 11 of FORM 10-K appears under the captions “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION”, “COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS”, “COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION”, and “OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS AND ARRANGEMENTS” in the Company’s 2005 Proxy Statement that will be filed within 120 days of fiscal year end and is hereby incorporated by reference.

 

Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

 

The information required by Item 12 of FORM 10-K appears under the captions “STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS” and “EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION” in the Company’s 2005 Proxy Statement that will be filed within 120 days of fiscal year end and is hereby incorporated by reference.

 

Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 

The information required by Item 13 of FORM 10-K appears under the caption “CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS” in the Company’s 2005 Proxy Statement that will be filed within 120 days of fiscal year end and is hereby incorporated by reference.

 

Item 14 Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 

The information required by Item 14 of FORM 10-K appears under the caption “PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES” in the Company’s 2005 Proxy Statement that will be filed within 120 days of fiscal year end and is hereby incorporated by reference.

 

PART IV

 

Item 15 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)   (1)    Financial Statements: Reference is made to Part II, Item 8, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
    (2)    Financial Statement Schedules: These schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.
    (3)    Exhibits: The exhibits listed in the “Exhibit Index” on pages 14-16 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K included herein are filed herewith or incorporated by reference from previous filings.
(b)        See (a) (3) above.
(c)        See (a) (1) and (2) above.

 

11


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

City Holding Company

(Registrant)

/s/ Charles R. Hageboeck

Charles R. Hageboeck

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ David L. Bumgarner

David L. Bumgarner

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 23, 2005. Each of the directors and/or officers of City Holding Company whose signature appears below hereby appoints Gerald R. Francis and/or Charles R. Hageboeck, as his attorney-in-fact to sign in his name and behalf, in any and all capacities stated below and to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, any and all amendments to this report on Form 10-K, making such changes in this report on Form 10-K as appropriate, and generally to do all such things in their behalf in their capacities as officers and directors to enable City Holding Company to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

/s/ Gerald R. Francis

     

/s/ Charles R. Hageboeck

Gerald R. Francis

Chairman

     

Charles R. Hageboeck

Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Samuel M. Bowling

     

/s/ C. Dallas Kayser

Samuel M. Bowling

      C. Dallas Kayser

Director

      Director

/s/ Hugh R. Clonch

     

/s/ Philip L. McLaughlin

Hugh R. Clonch

      Philip L. McLaughlin

Director

      Director

 

-12-


Table of Contents

/s/ Oshel B. Craigo

     

/s/ E. M. Payne, III

Oshel B. Craigo

     

E. M. Payne, III

Director

     

Director

/s/ William H. File, III

     

/s/ Robert T. Rogers

William H. File, III

     

Robert. T. Rogers

Director

     

Director

/s/ Robert D. Fisher

     

/s/ James L. Rossi

Robert D. Fisher

     

James L. Rossi

Director

     

Director

/s/ Jay C. Goldman

         

Jay C. Goldman

     

Sharon H. Rowe

Director

     

Director

/s/ David W. Hambrick

     

/s/ James E. Songer, II

David W. Hambrick

     

James E. Songer, II

Director

     

Director

/s/ Tracy W. Hylton II

     

/s/ Albert M. Tieche, Jr.

Tracy W. Hylton, II

     

Albert M. Tieche, Jr.

Director

     

Director

       

/s/ Mary H. Williams

       

Mary H. Williams

       

Director

 

-13-


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

The following exhibits are filed herewith or are incorporated herein by reference.

 

Exhibit

 

Description


2   Agreement and Plan of Reorganization , dated December 29, 2004, among City Holding Company, Classic Bancshares, Inc., City National Bank and Classic Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2 to Current Report Form on 8-K, dated December 29, 2004).
3(a)   Articles of Incorporation of City Holding Company (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, Amendment No. 1 to City Holding Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 2-86250, filed November 4, 1983 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
3(b)   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of City Holding Company , dated March 6, 1984 (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Form 8-K Report dated March 7, 1984, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 22, 1984).
3(c)   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of City Holding Company , dated March 4, 1986 (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 1986, filed March 31, 1987 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
3(d)   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of City Holding Company , dated September 29, 1987 (attached to and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 33-23295, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 3, 1988).
3(e)   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of City Holding Company , dated May 6, 1991 (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 1991, filed March 17, 1992 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
3(f)   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of City Holding Company , dated May 7, 1991 (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 1991, filed March 17, 1992 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
3(g)   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of City Holding Company , dated August 1, 1994 (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended September 30, 1994, filed November 14, 1994 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
3(h)   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of City Holding Company , dated December 9, 1998 (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 1998, filed March 31, 1999 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
3(i)   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of City Holding Company , dated June 13, 2001 (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed June 22, 2001 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
3(j)   Amended and Restated Bylaws of City Holding Company , as amended January 26, 2005.
4(a)   Rights Agreement , dated as of June 13, 2001, between City Holding Company and SunTrust Bank, as Rights Agent (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed June 22, 2001 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).

 

-14-


Table of Contents
10(a)   Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for the Directors of the Bank of Raleigh , dated January 1987.
10(b)   Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement for the Directors of the National Bank of Summers , dated January 15, 1987.
10(c)   Form of Employment Agreement , dated as of December 31, 1998, by and between City Holding Company and Philip L. McLaughlin (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 333-64205, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 24, 1998).
10(d)   Junior Subordinated Indenture , dated as of March 31, 1998, between City Holding Company and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 333-62419, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 28, 1998).
10(e)   Form of City Holding Company’s 9.15% Debenture due April 1, 2028 (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 333-62419, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 28, 1998).
10(f)   City Holding Company’s 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, Exhibit 4.1 to City Holding Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-87667, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 1999).
10(g)   Amendment No. 1 to City Holding Company’s 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, Exhibit 4.2 to City Holding Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-87667, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 1999).
10(h)   Amendment No. 2 to City Holding Company’s 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, filed August 14, 2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
10(i)   City Holding Company’s 2003 Incentive Plan (attached to, and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed March 21, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
10(j)   Form of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement , dated as of November 18, 2003, by and between City Holding Company and Gerald R. Francis (attached to and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed March 11, 2004 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
10(k)   Form of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement , dated as of November 18, 2003, by and between City Holding Company and William L. Butcher (attached to and incorporated by reference from, City Holding Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed March 11, 2004 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
10(l)   Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement , dated as of February 1, 2005, by and between City Holding Company and Charles R. Hageboeck.
10(m)   Form of Change of Control Agreement , dated February 1, 2005, by and between City Holding Company and David L. Bumgarner.
10(n)   Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement , dated as of February 25, 2005, by and between City Holding Company and Craig Stilwell.
13   Portions of City Holding Company Annual Report to Shareholders for Year Ended December 31, 2004.
21   Subsidiaries of City Holding Company
23   Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

-15-


Table of Contents
24   Power of Attorney (included on the signature page hereof)
31(a)   Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Charles R. Hageboeck
31(b)   Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by David L. Bumgarner
32(a)   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Charles R. Hageboeck
32(b)   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by David L. Bumgarner

 

-16-

Exhibit 3 (j)

 

CITY HOLDING COMPANY

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS

 

ARTICLE I

 

SHAREHOLDERS

 

Section 1. Annual Meetings. The annual meeting of the shareholders shall be held at the principal office of the corporation at Charleston, Kanawha County, West Virginia, on the 30th of March of each year, or at such other place and on such other date as the Board of Directors may designate by resolution from time to time.

 

For the purpose of determining shareholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting of the shareholders or any adjournment thereof, the Board of Directors may fix in advance a date as the record date for any such determination of shareholders, such date to be not more than fifty days and not less than ten days prior to the date of the annual meeting.

 

Section 2. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the shareholders may be called at any time by the Board of Directors or by the President and Secretary, or by any three or more shareholders holding together not less than ten percentum (10%) of the capital stock of the corporation.

 

For the purpose of determining shareholders entitled to vote at the special meeting of the shareholders or any adjournment thereof, the Board of Directors may fix in advance a date as the record date for any such determination of shareholders, such date to be not more than fifty days and not less than ten days prior to the date of the special meeting.

 

Section 3. Notice of Meetings. Notice of either annual or special meetings of the shareholders shall be given by mailing to each shareholder of record at his last know post office address, postage prepaid, at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the meeting, a written notice thereof. Such notice shall state the time and place of the meeting. The call for the meeting, if made by shareholders, shall be signed by the shareholders making the call. If the call should be made by the Board of Directors, it shall be signed by the President, a Vice President or the Secretary of the corporation. If the call be made by the President and the Secretary, it shall be signed by both of them. The notice of special meetings of the shareholders shall state the business to be transacted, and no business other than that included in the notice or incidental thereto shall be transacted at any such meeting. If such notice is mailed, it shall be deemed to have been given to a shareholder when deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, directed to the shareholder at such shareholder’s address as it appears on the record of shareholders of the corporation. Such further notice shall be given as may be required by law. A written waiver of any notice of any annual or special meeting signed by the person entitled thereto, shall be deemed equivalent to notice. Neither the business to be transacted at, nor the purpose of, any regular or special meeting of the shareholders needs to be specified in a written waiver of notice. Attendance of a shareholder at a meeting of shareholders shall constitute a waiver of notice of such meeting, except when the shareholder attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting, at the beginning of the meeting, to the transaction of any business on the ground that the meeting is not lawfully called or convened.

 

Section 4. Notice of Shareholder Business and Nominations

 

(a) Annual Meetings of Shareholders .

 

  (i)

Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors and the proposal of business to be considered by shareholders at an annual meeting may be made only (A) by the Board of Directors or the Chief Executive Officer, or (B) by any shareholder entitled to vote at the

 


 

meeting who complies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and rules and regulations promulgated thereunder and the notice procedures set forth in clause (ii) of this Section 4(a) and who was a shareholder of record at the time such notice is delivered to the Secretary of the corporation.

 

  (ii) For nominations or other business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a shareholder pursuant to clause (B) of paragraph (a)(i) of this Section 4, the shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary and any such business must be a proper matter for shareholder action. To be timely, a shareholder’s notice shall be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the corporation not less than 120 calendar days prior to the first anniversary of the previous year’s annual meeting. If no annual meeting was held in the previous year or the date of the annual meeting was changed by more than 30 days from the anniversary date of the previous year’s annual meeting, notice by the shareholder must be so received not later than 120 calendar days prior to such annual meeting or 10 calendar days following the date on which public announcement of the date of the meeting is first made.

 

  (iii) In no event shall an adjournment or postponement of an annual meeting (or the public announcement thereof) commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of shareholders’ notice as described below. Such shareholder’s notice shall set forth (A) as to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a Director all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of Directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, and Rule 14a-11 thereunder, including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a Director if elected; (B) as to any other business that the shareholder proposes to bring before the meeting, a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting, the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting and, in the event that such business includes a proposal to amend either the Articles of Incorporation or the bylaws, the language of the proposed amendment; (C) any material interest in such business of such shareholder and of any beneficial owner on whose behalf the proposal is made and, in case of nominations, a description of all arrangements or understandings between the shareholder and each nominee and any other persons (naming them) pursuant to which the nominations are to be made by the shareholder; (D) a representation that the shareholder is a holder of record of stock of the corporation entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by a qualified representative at the meeting to propose such business; (E) if the shareholder intends to solicit proxies in support of such shareholder’s proposals, a representation to that effect; and (F) as to the shareholder giving the notice and any beneficial owner on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made, (1) the name and address of such shareholder, as it appears on the corporation’s books, and of such beneficial owner and (2) the class and number of shares of the corporation which are owned beneficially and of record by such shareholder and such beneficial owner. If such shareholder does not appear or send a qualified representative to present such proposal at such annual meeting, the corporation need not present such proposal for a vote at such meeting, notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such vote may have been received by the corporation. The presiding officer of any annual meeting of shareholders shall refuse to permit any business proposed by a shareholder to be brought before such annual meeting without compliance with the foregoing procedures or if the shareholder solicits proxies in support of such shareholder’s proposal without such shareholder having made the representation required by clause (E) above.

 

-2-


(b) Special Meetings of Shareholders .

 

  (i) Only such business as shall have been brought before the special meeting of the shareholders pursuant to the corporation’s notice of meeting pursuant to Article I, Section 3 of these bylaws shall be conducted at such meeting.

 

  (ii) In the event that Directors are to be elected at a special meeting of shareholders pursuant to the corporation’s notice of meeting, nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors may be made at such special meeting of shareholders (1) by the Board of Directors or (2) by any shareholder entitled to vote at the meeting who complies with the notice procedures set forth in this Section 4 and who is a shareholder of record at the time such notice is delivered to the Secretary. Nominations by shareholders of persons for election to the Board of Directors may be made at such special meeting if the shareholder’s notice required by paragraph (a)(ii) of this Section 4 shall be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the corporation not later than 150 calendar days prior to such special meeting or 10 calendar days following the date on which public announcement of the date of the special meeting and of the nominees to be elected at such meeting is first made. In no event shall the adjournment or postponement of a special meeting (or the public announcement thereof) commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a shareholder’s notice as described above.

 

(c) General . Only persons who are nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 4 and in Article II, Section 15 herein shall be eligible to serve as Directors and only such business shall be conducted at a meeting of shareholders as shall have been brought before the meeting in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 4. Except as otherwise provided by law, the Articles of Incorporation or these bylaws, the presiding officer of the meeting shall have the power and duty to determine whether a nomination or any business proposed to be brought before the meeting was made or proposed in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 4 and, if any proposed nomination or business is not in compliance with this Section 4, to declare that such defective proposal or nomination shall be disregarded.

 

Section 5. Quorum. The holders of a majority of all the shares of the capital stock of the corporation entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum at any meeting for all purposes, including the election of Directors. Any number less than a quorum present may adjourn any shareholders’ meeting until a quorum is present.

 

Section 6. Conduct of Meetings . The Board of Directors may adopt rules for the conduct of meetings of shareholders. Unless inconsistent with any such rules, the presiding officer shall convene and adjourn the meeting and prescribe such appropriate procedures for the conduct of the meeting. Such procedures may include: (i) establishment of an agenda for the meeting; (ii) procedures for maintaining order at the meeting and the safety of those present; (iii) limitations on attendance at or participation in the meeting to shareholders of record of the corporation, their proxies or such other persons as the presiding officer shall determine; (iv) restrictions on entry to the meeting after the time fixed for the commencement thereof; and (v) limitations on the time allotted to questions or comments by participants. Meetings of shareholders shall not be required to be held in accordance with the rules of parliamentary procedure.

 

Section 7. Voting. In all elections of Directors, each shareholder shall have the right to cast one (1) vote for each share of stock owned by him and entitled to a vote, and he may cast the same in person or by proxy, for as many persons as there are Directors to be elected, or he may cumulate such votes and give one candidate as many votes as the number of Directors to be elected multiplied by the number of his shares of stock shall equal; or he may distribute them on the same principle among as many candidates and in such manner as he shall desire, and the Directors shall not be elected in any other manner; and on any other question to be determined by a vote of shares at any meeting of shareholders, each shareholder shall be entitled to one (1) vote for each share of stock in person or by proxy. If a shareholder intends to cumulate his votes in an election of directors, he must provide the corporation with written notice of his intention to do so. Such notice must be received by the corporation at least 48 hours

 

-3-


before the beginning of the meeting being held to consider the election of directors. Shares of another corporation, domestic or foreign, standing in the name of the corporation may be voted by the President, Senior Vice President or Corporate Secretary of the corporation.

 

Section 8. Inspectors . An appropriate number of inspectors for any meeting of shareholders may be appointed by the chairman of such meeting. Inspectors so appointed will open and close the polls, will receive and take charge of proxies and ballots, and will decide all questions as to the qualifications of voters, validly of proxies and ballots, and the number of votes properly cast.

 

Section 9. Annual Report. The President shall annually prepare a full and true statement of the affairs of the corporation, which shall be submitted at the annual meeting of the shareholders and filed within twenty (20) days thereafter in the principal office of the corporation at Charleston, West Virginia, where it shall, during the usual business hours of each secular day be open for inspection by any shareholder of the corporation.

 

ARTICLE II

DIRECTORS

 

Section 1. Number. The Board shall consist of not less than five nor more than twenty-five shareholders, the exact number within such minimum and maximum limits to be fixed and determined from time to time by resolution of a majority of the full Board or by resolution of the shareholders at any meeting thereof; provided, however, that a majority of the full Board of Directors may not increase the number of directors to a number which: (i) exceeds by more than three the number of directors last elected by shareholders where such number was fifteen or less; and (ii) to a number which exceeds by more than four the number of directors last elected by shareholders where such number was sixteen or more except when directors are added as a result of a business combination accounted for as a pooling-of-interests, but in no event shall the number of directors exceed twenty-five, and provided, further, however, that no decrease shall have the effect of shortening the term of any incumbent director.

 

Section 2. Director Emeritus. From time to time, the Board of Directors may elect one or more persons to serve as a Director Emeritus. A Director Emeritus shall have the privilege of attending those meetings of the Board of Directors at which the Board has invited in writing all Directors Emeritus. He shall not have the right to vote on any matters or to receive attendance fees for the meetings he attends.

 

Section 3. Qualifications. The members of the Board of Directors need not be residents of the State of West Virginia. Each member of the Board of Directors may serve until he reaches 70 years of age, at which time he shall be deemed to have retired from the Board. Beginning on January 1, 2005, each member of the Board of Directors shall complete a minimum of eight hours of continuing education annually, the sponsors and curriculum of which shall be approved by the Board of Directors. After December 31, 2005, any Director subject to this requirement who fails to complete the mandatory continuing education for the previous year shall have payment of their Board fees suspended until such continuing education is accomplished. For good cause shown, the Board of Directors may, in individual cases involving undue hardship or extenuating circumstances, grant conditional, partial, or complete exemptions of these minimum continuing education requirements. Any such exemption shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors at least once during each year, unless a lifetime conditional exemption has been granted. One hour of credit may be obtained for each period of fifty minutes of instruction attended in an approved course or by means of videocassette, videotape, audiocassette, or DVD instruction, provided that such instruction is approved by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors may designate providers or courses which are presumptively approved.

 

Section 4. Time of Holding Office. Commencing with the 1986 annual meeting of shareholder, the Board of Directors shall be divided into three classes, Class I, Class II, and Class III, as nearly equal in number as possible. At the 1986 annual meeting of shareholders, directors of the first class (Class I) shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the 1987 annual meeting of shareholders; directors of the second class (Class II) shall be elected to

 

-4-


hold office for a term expiring at the 1988 annual meeting of shareholders; and directors of the third class (Class III) shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the 1989 annual meeting of shareholders. At each annual meeting of shareholders after 1986, the successors to the class of directors whose term shall then expire shall be identified as being of the same class of directors they succeed and elected to hold office for a term expiring at the third succeeding annual meeting of shareholders. When the number of directors is changed, any newly-created directorships or any decrease in directorship shall be so apportioned among the classes by the Board of Directors as to make all classes as nearly equal as possible.

 

Section 5. Election of Officers. The Board of Directors shall elect from within their number a President. The Board shall also elect from within or without their number one or more Vice Presidents, a Secretary, a Treasurer, and all such other officers and agents as they may deem proper. The Board shall have the authority to fix the salaries of all officers and agents, whether such officers and agents be Directors or not. All officers and agents elected by the Board shall hold office during the pleasure of the Board.

 

Section 6. Quorum. A majority of the Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Any number less than a quorum present may adjourn any Directors’ meeting until a quorum is present.

 

Section 7. Regular Meetings. Regular meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held as needed.

 

Section 8. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the Board of Directors may be called by the President, or any three Directors to be held at such time and place and for such purposes as shall be specified in the notice.

 

Section 9. Notice of Special Meetings. Telephonic or written notice of every special meeting of the Board of Directors shall be duly give to each Director not less than one (1) day before such meeting. Such notice shall state the time and place of the meeting and, if the meeting is being called for the purpose of amending the bylaws or for the purpose of authorizing the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation, such notice shall set forth the nature of the business intended to be transacted. Notice of any meeting of the Board may be dispensed with if every Director shall attend in person, except where a director attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or convened, or if every absent Director shall in writing filed with the records of the meeting, either before or after the holding thereof, waive such notice. Any provision of these bylaws to the contrary notwithstanding a meeting of the Board of Directors may be held immediately following the adjournment of any meeting of the shareholders, and no notice need be given for any such meeting of the Board of Directors.

 

Section 10. Action by Telephonic Communications . Members of the Board of Directors may participate in any meeting of the Board of Directors by means of conference telephone or similar communications equipment by means of which all persons participating in the meeting can hear each other, and participation in any meeting pursuant to this provision shall constitute presence in person at such meeting.

 

Section 11. Action Without a Meeting . Any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the Board of Directors may be taken without a meeting if all members of the Board of Directors consent thereto in writing, and such writing or writings are filed with the minutes of proceedings of the Board of Directors. Action taken under this section is effective when the last Director signs the consent unless the consent specifies a different effective date, in which event the action taken is effective as of the date specified therein provided the consent states the date of execution by each Director.

 

Section 12. Chairman of the Board. The Board of Directors shall elect from among its members a Chairman of the Board of Directors who shall preside at all meetings of the Board of Directors and perform such other duties as may be designated by the Board.

 

Section 13. Committees. The Board of Directors may, by resolution of resolutions passed by a majority of the whole Board, designate one or more committees, each to consist of two or more of the Directors, which, to the

 

-5-


extent provided in such resolution or resolutions, shall have and may exercise the powers of the Board in the management of the business and affairs of the corporation, and may have power to authorize the seal of the corporation to be affixed to all papers which may require it. Such committee or committees shall have such name or names as may be determined from time to time by resolution adopted by the Board.

 

Section 14. Powers of Directors. The Board of Directors may exercise all of the powers of the corporation except such as are by law or by the charter or by the bylaws conferred upon or reserved to the shareholders. It shall also have the power to fix the compensation of the officers elected or appointed by it, and of all other officers and employees of the corporation; to purchase or otherwise acquire for the corporation any property rights or privileges which the corporation is authorized to acquire, at such price and on such terms and conditions as the Board may think proper; to sell or otherwise dispose of any property owned by the corporation and not necessary for carrying on the business of the corporation and upon such terms and conditions and for such consideration as the Board may deem proper. The Board may also confer on any officers of the corporation the right to choose, remove or suspend any subordinate officer, agent, or employee. The Directors shall further have the power to fix Directors’ fees form time to time in such amounts as the Directors shall deem proper.

 

Section 15. Newly-Created Directorships and Vacancies. Any vacancy occurring in the Board of Directors may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors though less than a quorum of the Board of Directors. A director elected or appointed, as the case may be, to fill a vacancy shall be elected or appointed for the unexpired term of his predecessor in office. Any directorship to be filled by reason of an increase in the number of directors may be filled by the board of directors for a term of office continuing only until the next election of directors. No decrease in the number of directors constituting the Board of Directors shall shorten the term of any incumbent director.

 

Section 14. Voting. No member of the Board of Directors shall vote on a question in which he is interested otherwise than as a shareholder, except the election of a President or other officer or employee or be present at the Board while the same is being considered; but if his retirement from the Board in such case reduces the number present below a quorum, the question may nevertheless be decided by those who remain. On any question the names of those voting each way shall be entered on the record of their proceedings if any member at the time requires it.

 

Section 15. Depositories. The Board of Directors shall have the power to designate the bank in which corporate funds and securities shall be deposited.

 

Section 16. Bonds for Officers. The Board of Directors may require any officer of the corporation whose duties involve the handling of its funds, or a part thereof, to furnish proper bond, such bond to be in a penalty to be prescribed by the Board.

 

Section 17. Removal of Directors. Any director may be removed, with or without cause, only by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding common stock.

 

ARTICLE III

 

OFFICERS

 

Section 1. Officers. The officers of the corporation shall be a President, one or more Vice Presidents as the Board of Directors may fix from time to time by proper resolutions, a Secretary and a Treasurer, all of whom shall be chosen by the Board of Directors as provided for in Section 4 of Article II of these bylaws. Any two of the above-named offices, except those of President and Secretary, may be held by the same person, but no officer shall execute an acknowledgement or verify any instrument in more than one capacity, if such instrument is required by law or by these bylaws to be executed, acknowledged, verified or countersigned by two or more officers. The Board

 

-6-


may, by resolution, provide for an Assistant Secretary and an Assistant Treasurer, and may also elect or appoint such other officers, agents and employees as the Board may deem proper.

 

Section 2. Powers and Duties. The officers of the corporation shall have such powers and duties as are usually incident to their respective offices, as well as such powers and duties as from time to time shall be assigned to them by the Board of Directors.

 

Section 3. Checks, Notes, Etc. All checks and drafts of the corporation, bank accounts, and all bills of exchange, promissory notes, and all acceptances, obligations and other instruments for the payment of money shall be signed and/or countersigned by such officers as the Board of Directors may designate.

 

Section 4. Corporate Acknowledgments. The corporation may acknowledge any instrument required by law to be acknowledged by its attorney appointed to serve, and such appointment may be embodied in the deed or instrument to be acknowledged, or be made by a separate instrument, or such deed or other instrument may be acknowledged by the President or a Vice President of the corporation without such appointment, or in any manner provided by law.

 

ARTICLE IV

 

CAPITAL STOCK

 

Section 1. Stock Certificates. The certificates of stock of this corporation shall be in such form as shall be approved by the Board of Directors, and shall be signed by the President or a Vice President and countersigned by the Secretary or Assistant Secretary and evidenced by the seal of the corporation. Each certificate shall recite on its face that the stock represented thereby is transferable only upon the books of the corporation properly endorsed.

 

Section 2. Issuing Stock and Fixing Value. The Board of Directors of this corporation may issue the shares of its capital stock from time to time for such considerations as the Board may deem advisable.

 

Section 3. Title. Title to a certificate and to the shares represented thereby may be transferred only (a) by delivery of the certificate endorsed, either in blank or to a specific person, by the person appearing by the certificate to be the owner of the shares represented thereby; or (b) by the delivery of the certificate and a separate document containing a written assignment of the certificate or a power of attorney to sell, assign, or transfer the same or the shares represented thereby, to be signed by the person appearing by the certificate to be the owner of the shares represented thereby. Such assignment or power of attorney may be either in blank or to a specified person.

 

Section 4. Lost Certificate. A new certificate may be issued in lieu of one lost or destroyed without requiring publication of notice of loss and the cost of said publication applied on a bond of proportionately increased penalty in any case where such procedure is agreed to by said holder of record and deemed adequate by the Board of Directors. A new certificate may also be issued in the discretion of the Board without requiring either the publication of notice of loss or the giving of a bond; and upon such other conditions as may be agreed to by said holder of record and deemed adequate by the Board for the protection of the corporation and its shareholders.

 

ARTICLE V

 

FISCAL YEAR AND CORPORATE SEAL

 

Section 1. Fiscal Year. The fiscal year of the corporation shall begin on the first day of January and shall end on the 31st day of December of each year.

 

-7-


Section 2. Corporate Seal. The Board of Directors shall provide a suitable seal containing the name of the corporation, which seal shall be in the charge and custody of the Secretary and Treasurer.

 

ARTICLE VI

 

DIVIDENDS

 

Section 1. Dividends. The Board of Directors may from time to time declare and pay dividends from the surplus or any profits of the corporation, whenever they shall deem it expedient in the exercise of discretion and in conformity with the provisions upon which the capital stock of the corporation has been issued. If any shareholder shall be indebted to the corporation, his dividend, or so much as is necessary thereof, may be applied to the payment of such indebtedness, if then due and payable.

 

Section 2. Working Capital. The Board of Directors may fix a sum which may be set aside or retained over and above the corporation’s capital stock paid in as working capital for the corporation, and from time to time as the Board may increase, diminish and vary the same in its absolute judgment and discretion.

 

ARTICLE VII

 

AMENDMENT OF BYLAWS

 

Section 1. Amendment. The Board of Directors shall have the power to make, amend and repeal the bylaws of the corporation at any regular or special meeting by a majority of the votes cast thereat.

 

* * * * * * * *

 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Amended and Restated Bylaws consisting of eight (8) pages, are the Amended and Restated Bylaws of City Holding Company adopted by the directors of the Bank as of January 26, 2005 and that they are the whole thereof exactly as adopted, and that I make this certificate to identify the same pursuant to instructions of the Board of Directors.

 

/s/ Victoria A. Evans
Victoria A. Evans, Secretary

 

-8-

Exhibit 10(a)

 

DIRECTORS’ DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 

ARTICLE I - Definitions

 

1.1 “Plan” means the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan of Bank of Raleigh, as described in this instrument, effective January, 1987, and thereafter.

 

1.2 “Bank” means Bank of Raleigh, a West Virginia corporation, or a successor corporation thereafter.

 

1.3 “Committee” means the Committee, if any, appointed to administer the Plan as and to the extent provided in Article 2.13.

 

1.4 “Director” means a Director of the Bank or of any division, subsidiary or affiliate of the Bank who is eligible to become a participant in the Plan under the eligibility requirements then in effect as established by the Committee pursuant to Article 2.13.

 

1.5 “Fiscal Year” means the fiscal year of the Bank as established from time to time.

 

1.6 “Participant” means a person who is selected to participate in the Plan and has executed the Adoption Agreement as required by Paragraph 2.7 hereof.

 

1.7 “Deferred Compensation” means the portion of a participant’s compensation for any fiscal year, or part thereof, that has been deferred pursuant to the Plan.

 

1.8 “Termination of Service” or similar expression means the termination of the participant as a Director of the Bank or any division, subsidiary or affiliate thereof. Total disability, whether temporary or permanent, as defined herein, shall not be considered termination of service, however, the deferral amount as stated in Paragraph H of the Adoption Agreement shall be terminated at time of disability, provided the participant does not continue to receive Director’s fees.

 

1.9 “Total Disability” whether temporary or permanent as used herein shall mean disability resulting from bodily injury provided same is not self-inflicted or disease that prevents a Participant from engaging in any occupation for compensation or profit which disability has existed continuously for at least six months.

 

1.10 “Normal Retirement Date” for each participant shall be the date set forth as the Participant’s Normal Retirement Date in Section E of the Adoption Agreement executed by Participant and Bank, an unexecuted copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit I.

 


ARTICLE II

 

2.1 Each Director of the Bank or of any division, subsidiary or affiliate of the Bank selected to participate in the Plan may have a portion of his Directors’ fees to be received by him deferred in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Plan. The amount of such fees that may be so deferred shall not exceed the amount indicated in Paragraph H of the Adoption Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit I (“Adoption Agreement”).

 

2.2 Continued Service . (a) Each Director in the Plan shall continue as a Director of the Bank under terms mutually agreed upon between the Bank and the Participant, from time to time, until the Participant reaches his Normal Retirement Date or until such date as may be mutually agreed upon, or until his prior death or total and permanent disability, as herein defined, or until consent of the Bank to his early retirement. Any payments under this Plan shall be independent of, and in addition to, those under any other Plan, program or agreement which may be in effect between the Bank and the Participant. This Plan and the Adoption Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit “I” shall not be construed as a contract of employment, nor do either restrict the right of the shareholders of the Bank to remove the Participant as a director, or the right of the Participant to resign as a Director. (b) In the event of total disability resulting in the participant terminating as a Director of the Board, the participant will receive benefits in accordance with the provisions for early termination.

 

2.3 Pre-Retirement Death Benefits . (a) If a Participant dies before his normal retirement date as specified in Paragraph F of the Adoption Agreement, while serving as a Director of the Bank, the Bank will pay to his beneficiary the monthly benefit stated in Paragraph F of the Adoption Agreement. (b) If a Participant resigns as a Director of the Bank before his Normal Retirement Date for any reason except retirement, no death benefit shall be payable unless he has completed two (2) years of participation in the Plan. (c) If the Participant who resigns has completed two (2) or more years participation in the Plan and dies prior to his normal Retirement Date, the Participant’s beneficiary(ies) will receive a monthly benefit for a total of 180 months. The amount of such benefit will be equal to a pro-rata portion of the pre-retirement Death Benefit based on the formula contained in the Article 2.6 hereof. In no event will this stated pre-retirement death benefit be greater than that specified in paragraph F of the Adoption Agreement.

 

All payments to be made pursuant to this Article 2.3 shall commence 30 days following the death of the Participant.

 

2.4 Post Retirement Death and Income Benefits . Upon a Participant attaining his Normal Retirement Date, whether or not he then retires, the Bank will pay him the monthly benefits stated in Paragraph G of the Adoption Agreement. Payments hereunder shall commence the month following his Normal Retirement Date.

 

If the Participant dies prior to receiving 180 monthly payments in the amount specified in Paragraph G of the Adoption Agreement, the Participant’s Beneficiary shall continue to receive such monthly payments in a like amount until the benefits provided for therein have been paid in full. If such Participant has received at least 180 monthly payments in the amount specified in Paragraph G of the Adoption Agreement prior to such Participant’s death, no further benefits shall be due hereunder.

 

2


2.5 Suicide . Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Plan, no benefits shall be payable hereunder to a Participant’s beneficiary if the Participant’s death occurs as a result of a suicide, while sane or insane, within two years after (i) the date of said Participant’s execution of the Adoption Agreement and/or (ii) the date of any subsequent change in the Benefits for said Participant.

 

2.6 Early Termination . If the Participant’s service as a Director of the Bank is terminated for reasons other than death or total and permanent disability prior to his Normal Retirement Date, with or without cause or voluntarily or involuntarily, and if the Participant’s termination was not due to fraudulent or dishonest conduct by the Participant, and if the Participant had not completed at least two (2) years participation in the Plan, the Bank shall return to the Participant all amounts of his Directors’ fees which were deferred, if any, as a result of his participation in this Plan and such Participant shall not be entitled to receive any benefits under the Plan.

 

If termination as a Director of the Bank occurs after a Participant has completed two (2) years of participation in the Plan, and if he is then living, the Participant shall at his normal Retirement Date receive a pro-rata portion of the post-retirement benefits provided for in Paragraph G of the Adoption Agreement determined as follows:

 

Years served on the Board of Bank after effective date of the Plan. (Rounded to the nearest whole year)          

 

Divided by

   X    Post Retirement Benefit stated in Paragraph G of the Adoption Agreement

 

Years Director would have been on the Board of the Bank after the effective date of the Plan if he had continued to serve on the Board until his Normal Retirement Date. (Rounded to the nearest whole year)

         

 

Payments due hereunder shall commence the month following his Normal Retirement Date.

 

2.7 Requirements for Participants . In order to participate herein, the Directors of the Bank selected to participate by the Bank shall execute an Adoption Agreement, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit “I”.

 

2.8 Beneficiary . Each Participant shall have the right to designate a Primary and Contingent Beneficiary entitled to receive the benefits payable upon death on behalf of such Participant under the provisions of this Plan. The Participant may change or revoke such designation in writing.

 

3


2.9 Unfunded Plan . No Participant or any other person shall have any interest in any fund or in any specific asset or assets of the Bank by reason of any amounts due him hereunder, nor any right to receive any distribution under the Plan except as and to the extent expressly provided in the Plan. Nothing in the Plan shall be deemed to give any subsidiary or affiliate of the Bank rights to participate in the Plan, except in accordance with the provisions of the Plan. All benefits provided for hereunder and all other amounts deferred hereunder are completely unsecured and are payable only out of the general assets of the Bank. The Bank shall be under no obligation whatsoever to purchase or maintain any life insurance policy or annuity contract or in any other manner provide the benefits or fund its obligations under this Plan.

 

2.10 Non-assignability . Neither the Participant nor the Participant’s spouse, nor their heirs or legatees shall have any right to commute, encumber or dispose of the right to receive payments hereunder, which payments and the right thereto are expressly declared to be non-assignable and non-transferable.

 

2.11 Rights of Rank to Terminate The Plan . The Bank shall have the right to terminate this Plan at any time. If the Plan is terminated, a Participant with less than two (2) years participation in the Plan shall receive a payment equal to the total compensation deferred by the Participant, if any, because of his participation in the Plan. If the Plan is terminated, a Participant with two (2) years or more participation in the Plan shall receive future benefits in the same manner and amount as he would have received had he terminated his service as a director on the date the plan is terminated. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, should the Bank elect to terminate the Plan, it shall be obligated to continue to pay all benefits provided for hereunder to all Participants or their beneficiaries, as the case may be, who have died or retired and who have become entitled to receive same in accordance with terms of the Plan.

 

2.12 Relation to Other Plans . Any benefits payable under this Plan shall not be deemed compensation to any Participant for the purpose of computing benefits to which he may be entitled under any pension or profit-sharing plan or other similar plan or arrangement of the Bank for the Benefit of its Participants.

 

2.13 Administration . The Board of Directors of the Bank shall have full power and authority to administer this Plan or at its election it may delegate such authority to a committee made up of three (3) members of the Bank’s Board of Directors. No member of the Board shall be liable to any person for any action taken or omitted in connection with the administration of this Plan unless attributable to his own willful misconduct or lack of good faith. The Directors shall, from time to time, establish eligibility requirements for participation in the Plan and rules for the Administration of the Plan that are not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan.

 

2.14 Amendment . The Board of Directors of the Bank reserves the right to amend this Plan in such manner as it in its sole discretion may deem necessary and proper.

 

2.15 Law Governing . This Plan shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of West Virginia.

 

2.16 Facility of Payment . Payment hereunder to the Participant or his or her beneficiary pursuant to this Plan shall fully discharge the Bank from all claims or liabilities with respect to

 

4


such payments unless, before such payment is made, the Bank has received at its principal place of business written notice by or on behalf of some other persons who claims to be entitled to such payments or some part thereof. In the event the Participant is deceased and a Court of competent jurisdiction has entered a final order with respect to his or her estate, payment of such money, or portions thereof, if any be due, pursuant to the terms of the judgment shall likewise fully protect the Bank making such payment unless, before such payment is made, written notice of a claim or adverse claim received in the manner provided above.

 

2.17 Effect of Merger, Etc . The Bank shall not merge, consolidate, or combine with any other business entity unless and until the succeeding or continuing Bank expressly assumes and confirms the duties and obligations of the Bank under this Plan.

 

5


EXHIBIT I

 

ADOPTION AGREEMENT

 

DIRECTORS’ DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 

A. I,                      , a Director of Bank of Raleigh, (the “Bank”) acknowledge that I have been furnished with a copy of the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan of the Bank of Raleigh (the “Plan”) and that I have been selected for participation therein.

 

B. I hereby adopt the plan and agree to be bound by all of its provisions as it now exists or may hereafter be amended.

 

C. My beneficiary(ies) is:

 

PRIMARY:

 

CONTINGENT:

 

D. I agree to take such physical examination and to supply truthfully and complete such information as may be required by the Bank.

 

E. My normal retirement date for purposes of the Plan is                      .

 

F. The amount of my pre-retirement death benefits payable under Paragraph 2.3(a) of the Plan is                      payable monthly for a total of 180 months.

 

  (i) The monthly Pre-Retirement Death Benefits will be increased by $                      on each plan anniversary prior to my fifty-fifth (55 th ) birthday; thereafter, the monthly Pre-Retirement Death Benefit will be the same as my monthly Post-Retirement Benefit.

 

G. The amount of my post-retirement income benefits payable under Paragraph 2.4 of the Plan is                      payable monthly for 180 months.

 

H. In consideration of my participation in this plan, I agree to defer $                      per month from my Directors Fees until my normal retirement date which shall be applied as provided in the Plan to which this Adoption Agreement is attached.

 

I. This Adoption Agreement may be amended only by the written consent of the Bank and the Participant, except that Participant can change his beneficiary designation in writing at any time, as provided in Article 2.8 of the Plan.

 

J. The effective date for my enrollment for all purposes of the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan is the later of January 1, 1990 or the date the Bank puts this Plan into effect.

 

6

Exhibit 10(b)

 

D EFERRED C OMPENSATION A GREEMENT

 

THIS AGREEMENT entered into this the 15th day of January, 1987, by and between THE NATIONAL BANK OF SUMMERS, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (hereinafter referred to as the “Corporation”), and                      , an independent contractor (hereinafter referred to as “Director”).

 

WHEREAS, the Director has provided services in a capable and efficient manner, resulting in substantial growth and progress to the Corporation; and

 

WHEREAS, the experience of the Director is such that assurance of his continued services is essential to the future growth and profits of the Corporation; and

 

WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to retain the services of the Director; and

 

WHEREAS, the Director is willing to continue to provide services to the Corporation if the Corporation will agree to pay to him or his designees certain benefits in accordance with the provisions and conditions hereinafter set forth; and

 

WHEREAS, the Corporation is the owner of certain life insurance policies and other property on behalf of the Director. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements between the parties, the parties covenant and agree as follows:

 

1. PROMISE TO PAY

 

Notwithstanding any other agreements between the parties, the Corporation agrees to pay the Director certain amounts, as hereinafter set forth, payments of which will be deferred pursuant to the terms of this Agreement as hereinafter set forth.

 

2. MATURITY DATE

 

The Corporation agrees that the payments to the Director shall commence upon the first day of the month following his sixty-fifth (65th) birthday, hereinafter called the Maturity Date.

 

3. DEFERRED COMPENSATION BENEFIT

 

If the Director is living on the Maturity Date, the Director shall be entitled to receive, in monthly installments over a period of one hundred eighty (180) Months, an amount determined by the following table assuming all dividends have been reinvested in the policy and the policy has been continuously kept in full force plus the then value of all other investments made by and owned by the Corporation on behalf of the Director.

 

Example: (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.) 12 monthly payments shall equal (1/15, 1/14, 1/13, etc.) of the net cash surrender value plus any dividend payable during the preceding year divided by one minus the current marginal Federal Tax bracket of the Corporation.

 


Table I

 

1st

   12    Months      -      1/15    (See above example)

2nd

   12    Months      -      1/14    "

3rd

   12    Months      -      1/13    "

4th

   12    Months      -      1/12    "

5th

   12    Months      -      1/11    "

6th

   12    Months      -      1/10    "

7th

   12    Months      -      1/9    "

8th

   12    Months      -      1/8    "

9th

   12    Months      -      1/7    "

10th

   12    Months      -      1/6    "

11th

   12    Months      -      1/5    "

12th

   12    Months      -      1/4    "

13th

   12    Months      -      1/3    "

14th

   12    Months      -      1/2    "

15th

   12    Months      -      Remainder     

 

“Net cash surrender value” shall mean the cash surrender value on the maturity date plus annual increases (cumulatively) of cash value less amounts of cash value used for payments to the Director (or equal to what would have been paid out of cash value if the corporation does not actually pay by borrowing or making partial surrenders) which would be the total payments to the Director less the tax savings of the Corporation due to the payments being tax deductible.

 

The Director shall be entitled to a minimum monthly payment of $                  beginning at the maturity date.

 

EXAMPLE OF 3 .

 

Dividend paid during preceding policy year $8,000.

Maturity Date cash surrender value $97,500.

                                             ($97,500)

First monthly payment = (15) + ($8,000) divided by 12 = $1,830.81

                                                 (1 - .34)

 

If Director is still alive after 15 years, a monthly amount equal to the 180th payment shall continue to be paid to the Director during the life of Director.

 

4. PREMATURITY DEATH BENEFIT

 

If the Director shall die prior to the Maturity Date, his beneficiaries, determined in accordance with Paragraph 5 hereof, shall receive, in equal monthly installments over a period of one hundred eighty (180) months, an amount determined by taking the death benefit of said policy, assuming all dividends have been reinvested in the policy and said policy has been kept continuously in full force, and dividing it by one minus the Federal marginal tax rate of the Corporation and dividing by the number of payments (180).

 

2


EXAMPLE OF 4

 

Death Benefit = $70,000.

 

                                                                     ($70,000)

180 equal monthly installments of (1 - .34) divided by 180 = $589.23

 

5. BENEFICIARY OF DEATH BENEFIT

 

In the event that the Director should die prior to receipt of any amount to which he is entitled hereunder, or of all such amounts, any amounts remaining unpaid shall be paid to such beneficiary or beneficiaries as the Director may designate by filing with the Corporation a notice in writing, but in the absence of any such designation, such unpaid amounts shall be paid to his surviving spouse, if living, and if not living, then the balance remaining shall be paid in a single lump sum to the Director’s estate.

 

6. INSTALLMENT PAYMENT OF DEATH BENEFIT

 

In the event payment of monthly installments shall have theretofore commenced to the Director, the beneficiaries shall receive the balance of the monthly payments in the amount of the last monthly payment that was paid to the Director for up to 15 years, but in no case shall there be more than a total of 180 payments (including payments to the Director as well as the beneficiary).

 

7. TERMINATION BENEFIT

 

If the Director shall become disabled or his services shall be terminated for any reason other than death, he shall be entitled to monthly installments determined by the formula established in Paragraph 3 hereof. However, the minimum monthly payment provision shall not apply.

 

8. NON-ASSIGNABLE RIGHTS

 

Except as otherwise provided by this Agreement, it is agreed that neither the Director nor his spouse, nor other beneficiary, shall have any right to commute, sell, assign, transfer or otherwise convey the right to receive any payments hereunder which payments and the right thereto are expressly declared to be non-assignable and non-transferable.

 

9. NON-FORFEITABLE RIGHTS

 

All rights and benefits provided to the Director under this Agreement shall be fully vested and non-forfeitable.

 

10. INDEPENDENCE OF AGREEMENT

 

The benefits payable under this Agreement shall be independent of, and in addition to, any other service agreement that may exist from time to time between the parties hereto, or any other compensation payable by the Corporation to the Director.

 

This Agreement shall not be deemed to constitute a contract of service between the parties hereto, nor shall any provision hereof restrict the right of the Corporation to discharge the Director, or restrict the right of the Director to terminate his services.

 

11. NON-SECURED PROMISE

 

The rights of the Director under this Agreement and of any beneficiary of the Director shall be solely those of an unsecured creditor of the Corporation. Any insurance policy or any other asset acquired or held by the Corporation in connection with the liabilities assumed by it hereunder, shall not, except as otherwise expressly provided, be deemed to be held under any trust for the benefit of

 

3


the Director or his beneficiaries or to be security for the performance of the obligations of the Corporation, but shall be, and remain, a general, unpledged, unrestricted asset of the Corporation.

 

12. CHANGE OF BUSINESS FORM

 

The Corporation agrees that it will not merge or consolidate with any other corporation or organization, or permit its business activities to be taken over by any other organization, unless or until the succeeding or continuing corporation or other organization shall expressly assume the rights and obligations of the Corporation herein set forth. The Corporation further agrees that it will not cease its business activities or terminate its existence, other than as heretofore set forth in this Paragraph 12, without having made adequate provision for the fulfilling of its obligations hereunder. In the event of any default with respect to the provision of this Paragraph 12, the Director (or other obligee or obligees) shall have a continuing lien on all corporate assets, including already transferred assets, until such default be corrected.

 

13. AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT

 

This Agreement may be revoked or amended in whole or in part by a writing signed by both the parties hereto.

 

14. GOVERNING LAW

 

This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of West Virginia.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Agreement to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officer, and impressed with its corporate seal, and properly attested to, and the said Director has hereunto set his hand and seal, all on the day and year first above written.

 

ATTEST:

     

CORPORATION

   
               

(SEAL)

Witness            
               

(SEAL)

Witness       Director    

 

4

Exhibit 10(1)

 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), is made and is effective as of the 1st day of February, 2005, between CITY HOLDING COMPANY, a West Virginia corporation (“Employer”), and CHARLES R. HAGEBOECK (“Employee”).

 

RECITALS

 

A. Employer wishes to employ Employee as its President and Chief Executive Officer and as President and Chief Executive Officer of its subsidiary, City National Bank of West Virginia (“City National”). For purposes of this Agreement, “Employer” shall include City National where the contact so requires.

 

B. Employer and Employee previously entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective as of November 18, 2003 (“Prior Agreement”), and now desire to amend such Prior Agreement as provided herein and to confirm such Agreement in all respects, including the amendments provided for herein.

 

AGREEMENT

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

 

1. Employment , Section 1 of the Prior Agreement is amended to read, in its entirety, as follows.

 

Employee is employed as President and Chief Executive Officer of Employer and President and Chief Executive Officer of City National. Employee shall have such duties and responsibilities as are commensurate with such positions. Employee accepts and agrees to such employment, subject to the general supervision and pursuant to the orders, advice and direction of Employer’s Boards of Directors. Employee shall perform such duties as are customarily performed by one holding such positions in other same or similar businesses or enterprises as that engaged in by Employer. If Employer, without the written consent of Employee, assigns to Employee duties which the Employee deems inconsistent with the title, position and status of President and Chief Executive Officer, such action at Employee’s option, to be exercised within 60 days of such change, shall constitute “Termination for Good Reason,” with the effect provided for in Section 6(d).

 


Exhibit 10(1)

 

2. Compensation .

 

(a) Section 3(a) of the Prior Agreement shall be amended to read, in its entirety, as follows:

 

For all services rendered by Employee to Employer under this Agreement, Employer shall pay to Employee a minimum annual salary at a rate not less than $325,000, payable in accordance with the payroll practices of Employer applicable to its officers.

 

(b) Section 3(b) of the Prior Agreement shall be amended to read, in its entirety, as follows:

 

Employee shall be paid a bonus at the end of each of Employer’s fiscal years, based on Employer’s Return on Equity, if Return on Equity is at least 12%, payable as follows: If Employer’s Return on Equity is 12%, Employee shall receive a bonus of 20% of Employee’s annual salary. If Return on Equity is greater than 12%, Employee shall receive a bonus of 20% of his annual salary, plus an additional 5% of annual salary for each 1% increase in Return on Equity over 12%. If Return on Equity results in a fraction of 1%, then the bonus shall be calculated based on the formula set forth above through the whole number of the percentage, plus the fractional portion of Return on Equity times 5%.

 

Any bonus shall be paid to Employee within 30 days of the issuance of Employer’s audited financial statements for a specified fiscal year. “Return on Equity” shall be determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles before extraordinary items. Unless otherwise approved in the discretion of the Board of Directors or its Executive Compensation Committee, no bonus shall be payable if Return on Equity is less than 12%. In the event that, during any fiscal year, Employee dies, is deemed to have voluntarily terminated his employment by reason of disability, is terminated without Just Cause, or terminates employment for Good Reason, the bonus provided for herein shall be prorated based on the number of days worked by Employee in the fiscal year of his termination of employment to the number of days in such fiscal year.

 

2


Exhibit 10(1)

 

(c) Section 3 of the Prior Agreement shall be amended to add a new Subsection (1), which shall read, in its entirety, as follows:

 

For so long as Employee is employed by Employer, Employer shall pay one country club membership, including dues and fees, for Employee and shall reimburse Employee for expenses incurred with respect to businesses conducted at said country club, but not for personal costs and expenses.

 

3. Additional Termination Benefits; Survival . The Prior Agreement is hereby amended to provide for new Sections 9 and 10 to read, in their entirety, as follows:

 

9. Additional Compensation . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 6, in the event that Employee: (i) dies; (ii) becomes disabled; (iii) is terminated without Just Cause; or (iv) terminates pursuant to the last sentence of Section 1 or Subsection 8(g) hereof or for Good Reason, then in addition to any other compensation payable hereunder, Employee shall be paid a lump sum payment in an amount equal to Employee’s Termination Compensation (as defined in Subsection 6(a)). The additional compensation payable under this Section 9 shall be paid within thirty (30) days of Employee’s termination of employment except to the limited extent necessary to delay payment to avoid adverse tax consequences to Employee under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 19 6, as amended. For purposes of clarity, the parties agree that the payment provided for under this Section 9 shall not be payable in the event of voluntary termination of employment by Employee, except that such payment shall be made in the event of termination pursuant to the last sentence of Section 1 or Subsection 8(g) hereof or for Good Reason.

 

10. Survival . To the extent necessary to effectuate the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement, and the respective rights and obligation of the parties, which must survive the termination of Employee’s employment or the termination of this Agreement shall so survive. Without limiting the foregoing, Sections 5 , 6(a), 6(c), 6(d), 6(e), 6(g), 8(g) and 9 shall expressly survive the termination of this agreement.

 

4. No Other Changes . Except as amended hereby, the Prior Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, in all respects, in accordance with the terms thereof.

 

3


Exhibit 10(1)

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above.

 

City Holding Company

/s/ Gerald R. Francis

Name: Gerald R. Francis
Title:   Chairman of the Board
Date:   February 1, 2005

 

Employee:

/s/ Charles R. Hageboeck

Charles R. Hageboeck
Date: February 1, 2005

 

Exhibit 10(m)

 

CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

 

THIS CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is by and between CITY HOLDING COMPANY (“Employer”), and DAVID BUMGARNER (“Employee”), recites and provides.

 

Recitals :

 

A. Employee is employed by Employer as Senior Vice President and Controller.

 

B. Employee is willing to make his/her services available to Employer on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein.

 

Agreement :

 

In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:

 

  1. Change in Control . In the event of a Change of Control (as defined herein) of Employer, Employee may voluntarily terminate employment with Employer until the expiration of the 12 month period after the Change of Control for “Good Reason” and be entitled to receive (i) any compensation already due and earned but not yet paid through the date of termination and (ii) in lieu of any further salary payments from the date of termination, an amount equal to Termination Compensation times1.00. Such amounts will be payable at the times such amounts would have been paid in accordance with the payroll practices of Employer applicable to its officers and will be paid out in regular payroll installments over the course of 12 months. In addition, in the event of a Change of Control coupled with “Good Reason”, Employee shall be entitled to receive health insurance coverage from Employer on the same terms as were in effect immediately prior to Employee’s termination for a period of 12 months subject to any later changes in coverage applicable to all employees.

 


“Good Reason” shall mean the occurrence at any time within 12 months after a Change of Control of any of the following events without Employee’s express written consent:

 

(a) the assignment to Employee of duties substantially inconsistent with the position held by Employee immediately prior to the Change of Control;

 

(b) a reduction by Employer in Employee’s base salary as then in effect.

 

(c) an involuntary relocation of Employee more than 40 miles from the location where Employee worked immediately prior to the Change of Control;

 

(d) any purported termination of the employment of Employee by Employer within 18 months after a Change of Control without “Just Cause.” “Just Cause” shall mean termination, for Employee’s personal dishonesty, gross incompetence, willful misconduct, breach of a fiduciary duty involving personal profit, intentional failure to perform stated duties, willful violation of any law, rule or regulation (other than traffic violations or similar offenses) or a final cease-and-desist order, conviction of a felony or of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, unethical business practices in connection with Employer’s business, or misappropriation of Employer’s assets or similarly serious violation of policy of City National Bank or City Holding Company. If the termination is for “Just Cause”, then no termination compensation shall be paid. It is expressly understood and agreed that this provision shall not in any way effect or change the at-will status of the Employee and this provision shall only be used in determining whether the Employee qualifies for termination compensation after a Change in Control as defined herein.

 

A “Change of Control” shall be deemed to have occurred if (i) any person or group of persons (as defined in Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) together with its affiliates, excluding CHCO and employee benefit plans of Employer, is or becomes, directly or indirectly, the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of securities of Employer representing 25% or more of the combined voting power of Employer’s then outstanding securities; or (ii) during the term of this Agreement as a result of a tender offer or exchange offer for the purchase of securities of Employer (other than such an offer by Employer for its own securities), or as a result of a proxy contest, merger, consolidation or sale of assets, or as a result of any combination of the foregoing, individuals who at the beginning of any two-year period during the term of this Agreement constitute Employer’s Board of Directors, plus new directors whose election or nomination for election by Employer’s shareholders is approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors still in office who were directors at the beginning of such two-year period, cease for any reason during such two-year period to constitute at least two-thirds of the members of such Board of Directors; or (iii) the shareholders of

 

-2-


Employer approve a merger or consolidation of Employer with any other corporation or entity resulting in the other entity being the survivor; or (iv) the shareholders of Employer approve a plan of complete liquidation or winding-up of Employer or an agreement for the sale or disposition by Employer of all or substantially all of Employer’s assets; or (v) any event which Employer’s Board of Directors affirmatively determines should constitute a Change of Control. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, if (i) Employee’s employment is terminated prior to a Change of Control, and (ii) Employee reasonably demonstrates that such termination (for Good Reason event) was at the request or suggestion of a third party who had indicated an intention or taken steps reasonably calculated to effect a Change of Control, and (iii) such termination of Employee for good reason event occurred within three (3) months prior to an official 8(K) public announcement of the Change of Control, then for purposes of this Agreement, the Employee shall be entitled to the Change of Control benefits as set forth herein, effective on the date the Change of Control actually occurs.

 

“Termination Compensation” shall mean

 

  a) the highest amount of annual cash compensation including cash bonuses; but not including stock bonuses, stock options or stock acquired pursuant to stock options; and not including the value of any other non-cash benefits (i.e. health, dental, life, disability insurance) received during any one of the three calendar years preceding the year of termination of employment regardless of the length of employment of Employee. However, if Employee has been employed for less than 12 months prior to a Change in Control, then the termination compensation shall be equal to the sum of 1) the employee’s current annualized base salary and 2) the greater of any bonus paid in the prior calendar year or the targeted bonus as described in any existing documented incentive plan provided to the employee. With respect to Mr. Bumgarner, the targeted bonus is defined as 20% of his base salary. Termination Compensation does not include stock bonuses, stock options or stock acquired pursuant to stock options; and not including the value of any other non-cash benefits (i.e. health, dental, life, disability insurance).

 

2. No Obligation to Seek Other Employment . While receiving payments pursuant to this Agreement, Employee shall not be obligated to seek other employment or take any other action by way of mitigation of the amounts payable to Employee hereunder, and such amounts shall not be reduced or terminated whether or not Employee obtains other employment.

 

-3-


3. Non-Competition/Non-Solicitation – If the employment of Employee terminates for any reason whatsoever (resignation, change in control, retirement, fired, etc.), and whether or not related to a Change of Control, then Employee agrees that he/she will not directly or indirectly, either as principal, agent, employee, employer, co-partner, or in any other individual or representative capacity whatsoever engage in the banking and/or the financial services business which includes, but is not limited to, commercial banking, consumer banking, retail banking, bank management, mortgage brokerage, bank marketing, bank product marketing, and the insurance and trust business, or the savings and loan business or mortgage business, or any other businesses in which the Company or its affiliates are involved. This no compete shall apply to the following geographical area: in any county of any state in which the Company or City National Bank maintains offices immediately prior to the “Change of Control”, as well as the counties of Kanawha, Putnam, Jackson, Cabell, Wayne, Mason, Lincoln, Doddridge, Marion, Raleigh, Summers, Fayette, Greenbrier, Nicholas, Braxton, Lewis, Monroe, Pocahontas, Mercer, Wood, Harrison, Jefferson, Berkeley, Morgan, Hampshire in West Virginia or the counties of Boyd, Carter, Greenup or Johnson in Kentucky, or the counties of Lawrence or Scioto in Ohio. This non-competition provision shall be in effect for one (1) year beginning immediately after the separation of employment. However, if litigation and/or arbitration is commenced by the Employer or Employee directly or indirectly pertaining to this non-competition provision or the non-solicitation provision herein below, then the non-competition and non-solicitation provision(s) herein shall begin upon separation of employment, continue through arbitration and/or litigation and terminate one (1) year after entry of a final non-appendable ruling by a court and/or arbitration tribunal of competent jurisdiction.

 

If the employment of Employee terminates for any reason whatsoever (resignation, change in control, retirement, fired, etc.), and whether or not related to a Change of Control, then for a period of one (1) year after employment with Employer, the Employee agrees not to solicit or assist any person in so soliciting, any depositors, customers or employees of the Company or its affiliates, or directly or indirectly induce or attempt to persuade any current or former employees of the Company or its affiliates to terminate their employment with the Company or its affiliates.

 

4. At-Will Status . Employee acknowledges, agrees and understands that he/she is an “at will” employee serving at the will and pleasure of the Employer. Employee understands, agrees and represents that this Change of Control Agreement and the terms herein in no way alters, amends or modifies the at-will status of the employee. Employee understands the full meaning of this paragraph.

 

5. The Employee agrees and understands that this entire Agreement (as well as employment) is being given to Employee in consideration of the no-compete and non-solicitation provisions herein and that at anytime the Employee

 

-4-


violates the no-compete, non-solicitation or any other provision of this Agreement, then Employer has the right to seek proper relief, including stopping any termination compensation payments (if applicable), seek recoupment of amounts already paid (if applicable), obtain an injunction and avail itself to any other proper relief or remedy including money damages, if applicable.

 

6. Miscellaneous .

 

a. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of West Virginia without regard to conflicts of law principles thereof.

 

b. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between Employee and Employer, with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior agreements with respect thereto.

 

c. Arbitration . All parties agree that any dispute related to this Agreement, shall be arbitrated in accordance with the Rules of the American Arbitration Association with each party to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. Such arbitration shall occur in Charleston, West Virginia before a panel of three (3) arbitrators with the selection of the arbitrators being made as follows: Employer selects one, Employee selects one and the two (2) arbitrators select a third arbitrator.

 

d. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which, taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.

 

e. The Employee acknowledges that he/she has read this Agreement and has been given an opportunity to have counsel of his/her choice review this Agreement.

 

f. Any notice or other communication required or permitted under this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing and delivered in person or by reliable overnight courier service or deposited in the mails, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows:

 

To Employer:

City Holding Company

25 Gatewater Road

Cross Lanes, West Virginia 25313

(304) 769-1100

Attention: Corporate Secretary

 

-5-


To Employee:

 

David Bumgarner

214 Bent Tree Estates

Scott Depot, WV 25560

 

g. The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable and the invalidity or unenforceability of any provision shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the other provisions hereof. It is understood and agreed that no failure or delay by Employer or Employee in exercising any right, power or privilege under this Agreement shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege hereunder.

 

7. Timely Notice . In order to receive termination compensation and the health insurance benefit set forth in numbered paragraph 1, the Employee agrees to notify City Holding Company in writing within 45 days of the “Good Reason” event that entitles the Employee to termination compensation. Failure to provide such written notice shall be deemed a full waiver of all termination compensation. It is specifically understood and agreed that this 45-day notice is a material condition precedent to the Employer’s obligation to pay these benefits. Employee fully understands the need for timely notice and agrees that termination compensation and health insurance will not be paid if notice is not given within 45 days of the “Good Reason” event.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written.

 

DATE   February 1, 2005       CITY HOLDING COMPANY

Victoria Evans

      By:  

/s/ Charles R. Hageboeck

Witness

             

Name:

 

Charles R. Hageboeck

               

Title:

 

President & CEO

DATE   February 1, 2005       EMPLOYEE    

Victoria Evans

     

/s/ David Bumgarner

Witness

     

DAVID BUMGARNER

 

-6-

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), is made and is effective as of the 25 th day of February , 2005, between CITY HOLDING COMPANY , a West Virginia corporation (“Employer”), and CRAIG G. STILWELL (“Employee”).

 

RECITALS

 

A. Employer wishes to employ Employee as its Executive Vice President of Retail Banking and as Executive Vice President of Retail Banking of its subsidiary, City National Bank of West Virginia (“City National”). For purposes of this Agreement, “Employer” shall include City National where the contact so requires.

 

B. Employer and Employee previously entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective as of November 18, 2003 (“Prior Agreement”), and now desire to amend such Prior Agreement as provided herein and to confirm such Agreement in all respects, including the amendments provided for herein.

 

AGREEMENT

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

 

1. Employment . Section 1 of the Prior Agreement is amended to read, in its entirety, as follows.

 

Employee is employed as Executive Vice President of Retail Banking of Employer and Executive Vice President of Retail Banking of City National. Employee shall have such duties and responsibilities as are commensurate with such positions. Employee accepts and agrees to such employment, subject to the general supervision and pursuant to the orders, advice and direction of Employer’s Chief Executive Officer. Employee shall perform such duties as are customarily performed by one holding such positions in other same or similar businesses or enterprises as that engaged in by Employer, and shall also additionally render such other services and duties as may be reasonably assigned to him from time to time by Employer’s Chief Executive Officer, consistent with his positions. If Employer, without the written consent of Employee, assigns to Employee duties which the Employee deems inconsistent with the title, position and status of

 


Executive Vice President of Retail Banking, such action at Employee’s option, to be exercised within 60 days of such change, shall constitute “Termination for Good Reason,” with the effect provided for in Section 6(d).

 

2. Additional Termination Benefits; Survival . The Prior Agreement is hereby amended to provide for new Sections 9 and 10 to read, in their entirety, as follows:

 

9. Additional Compensation . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 6, in the event that Employee: (i) dies; (ii) becomes disabled; (iii) is terminated without Just Cause; or (iv) terminates pursuant to the last sentence of Section 1 or Subsection 8(g) hereof or for Good Reason, except that, for purposes of this Section 9 only, “Good Reason” shall not include the provisions of Subsection 6(d)(v), unless one or more of the factors of Subsections 6(d)(i) to (iv) also occur, then in addition to any other compensation payable hereunder, Employee shall be paid a lump sum payment in an amount equal to Employee’s Termination Compensation (as defined in Subsection 6(a)). The additional compensation payable under this Section 9 shall be paid within thirty (30) days of Employee’s termination of employment except to the limited extent necessary to delay payment to avoid adverse tax consequences to Employee under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. For purposes of clarity, the parties agree that the payment provided for under this Section 9 shall not be payable in the event of voluntary termination of employment by Employee, except that such payment shall be made in the event of termination pursuant to the last sentence of Section 1 or Subsection 8(g) hereof or for Good Reason.

 

10. Survival . To the extent necessary to effectuate the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement, and the respective rights and obligations of the parties, which must survive the termination of Employee’s employment or the termination of this Agreement shall so survive. Without limiting the foregoing, Sections 5, 6(a), 6(c), 6(d), 6(e), 6(g), 8(g) and 9 shall expressly survive the termination of this Agreement.

 

3. No Other Changes . Except as amended hereby, the Prior Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, in all respects, in accordance with the terms thereof.

 

2


IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above.

 

City Holding Company

By  

/s/ Charles R. Hageboeck

Name:

  Charles R. Hageboeck

Title:

  President & Chief Executive Officer

Employee:

/s/ Craig G. Stilwell

Craig G. Stilwell

 

3

Exhibit 13

 

S ELECTED F INANCIAL D ATA

 

T ABLE O NE

F IVE - YEAR F INANCIAL S UMMARY

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

     2004

    2003

    2002

    2001

    2000

 

Summary of Operations

                                        

Total interest income

   $ 118,881     $ 117,290     $ 128,965     $ 177,480     $ 202,912  

Total interest expense

     31,871       31,785       42,299       86,415       113,756  

Net interest income

     87,010       85,505       86,666       91,065       89,156  

(Recovery of) provision for loan losses

     —         (6,200 )     1,800       32,178       25,480  

Total other income

     50,036       38,738       33,525       42,852       41,033  

Total other expenses

     66,333       64,498       69,210       114,405       158,812  

Income (loss) before income taxes

     70,713       65,945       49,181       (12,666 )     (54,103 )

Income tax expense (benefit)

     24,369       22,251       16,722       (4,651 )     (15,730 )

Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax

     —         —         —         (17,985 )     —    

Net income (loss)

     46,344       43,694       32,459       (26,000 )     (38,373 )

Per Share Data

                                        

Net income (loss) basic

   $ 2.79     $ 2.63     $ 1.93     $ (1.54 )   $ (2.27 )

Net income (loss) diluted

     2.75       2.58       1.90       (1.54 )     (2.27 )

Cash dividends declared

     0.88       0.80       0.45       —         0.44  

Book value per share

     12.99       11.46       9.93       8.67       9.68  

Selected Average Balances

                                        

Total loans

   $ 1,337,172     $ 1,219,917     $ 1,255,890     $ 1,758,834     $ 1,969,785  

Securities

     705,032       561,437       515,700       370,434       370,247  

Deposits

     1,659,143       1,593,521       1,617,782       1,944,244       2,053,828  

Long-term debt

     201,218       109,947       124,874       119,354       157,008  

Shareholders’ equity

     206,571       178,372       158,011       154,312       199,702  

Total assets

     2,211,853       2,006,992       2,042,164       2,432,349       2,777,019  

Selected Year-End Balances

                                        

Net loans

   $ 1,336,959     $ 1,270,765     $ 1,175,887     $ 1,341,620     $ 1,927,532  

Securities

     679,774       704,961       517,794       383,552       385,462  

Deposits

     1,672,723       1,636,762       1,564,580       1,691,295       2,083,941  

Long-term debt

     148,836       190,836       112,500       116,828       122,332  

Shareholders’ equity

     216,080       190,690       165,393       146,349       163,457  

Total assets

     2,213,230       2,214,430       2,047,911       2,116,295       2,671,500  

Selected Ratios

                                        

Return on average assets

     2.10 %     2.18 %     1.59 %     (1.07 )%     (1.38 )%

Return on average equity

     22.43       24.50       20.54       (16.85 )     (19.22 )

Net interest margin

     4.29       4.65       4.68       4.12       3.66  

Efficiency ratio

     48.67       51.63       58.24       86.98       117.46  

Average equity to average assets

     9.34       8.89       7.74       6.34       7.19  

Dividend payout ratio

     31.54       30.42       23.32       N/A       N/A  

Net charge-offs to average loans

     0.27       0.07       1.75       1.26       0.61  

(Recovery of) provision for loan losses to average loans

     —         (0.51 )     0.14       1.83       1.29  

Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans

     487.28       528.78       948.24       164.54       199.88  

Allowance for loan losses to total loans

     1.31       1.66       2.37       3.50       2.06  

Full-time equivalent employees

     691       701       737       802       1,352  

 

1


 

T WO -Y EAR S UMMARY OF C OMMON S TOCK P RICES AND D IVIDENDS

 

     Cash
Dividends
Per Share*


   Market Value

        Low

   High

2004

                    

Fourth Quarter

   $ 0.22    $ 31.85    $ 37.58

Third Quarter

     0.22      28.69      33.05

Second Quarter

     0.22      27.30      35.71

First Quarter

     0.22      32.35      36.18

2003

                    

Fourth Quarter

   $ 0.20    $ 31.50    $ 37.15

Third Quarter

     0.20      28.91      36.00

Second Quarter

     0.20      27.30      30.00

First Quarter

     0.20      25.50      28.99

 

* As more fully discussed under the caption Liquidity in Management’s Discussion and Analysis and in Note Seventeen of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company’s ability to pay dividends to its shareholders is dependent upon the ability of City National to pay dividends to City Holding (“Parent Company”).

 

The Company’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ stock market under the symbol CHCO. This table sets forth the cash dividends paid per share and information regarding the market prices per share of the Company’s common stock for the periods indicated. The price ranges are based on transactions as reported on the NASDAQ stock market. At December 31, 2004, there were 3,275 shareholders of record.

 

M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS

 

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY

 

City Holding Company (the “Company”), a West Virginia corporation headquartered in Charleston, West Virginia, is a bank holding company that provides diversified financial products and services to consumers and local businesses. Through its network of 56 banking offices in West Virginia (54) and Ohio (2), the Company provides credit, deposit, trust, and insurance products and services to its customers. In addition to its branch network, the Company’s delivery channels include ATMs, check cards, interactive voice response systems, and Internet technology. The Company’s business activities are currently limited to one reportable business segment, which is community banking. The Company has approximately 7% of the deposit market in West Virginia and is the third largest bank headquartered in West Virginia based on deposit share. In the Company’s key markets, the Company’s primary subsidiary, City National Bank of West Virginia (“City National”), generally ranks in the top three relative to deposit market share.

 

C RITICAL A CCOUNTING P OLICIES

 

The accounting policies of the Company conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and require management to make estimates and develop assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and related footnotes. These estimates and assumptions are based on information available to management as of the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from management’s estimates. As this information changes, management’s estimates and assumptions used to prepare the Company’s financial statements and related disclosures may also change. The most significant accounting policies followed by the Company are presented in Note One of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of retained interests in securitized mortgage loans and previously securitized loans to be the accounting areas that require the most subjective or complex judgments and, as such, could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available.

 

Pages 15-18 of this Annual Report to Shareholders provide management’s analysis of the Company’s allowance for loan losses and related provision. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based upon an evaluation of individual credits in the loan portfolio, historical loan loss experience, current economic conditions, and other relevant factors. This determination is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change. The allowance for loan losses related to loans considered to be impaired is generally evaluated based on the discounted cash flows using the impaired loan’s initial effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral for certain collateral dependent loans.

 

2


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

Note Six of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, beginning on page 38 of this Annual Report to Shareholders, and pages 18-19 provide management’s analysis of the Company’s retained interests in securitized mortgage loans and its previously securitized loans. When the Company sold certain receivables in securitizations of high loan-to-value loans, it retained a financial interest in the securitizations. The financial interest, or retained interest, was comprised of the estimated fair value of two components: (1) the excess cash flows between interest collected on the underlying collateral loans minus interest paid to third-party investors plus fees paid for servicing, insurance, and trustee costs, and (2) overcollateralization. Gains recognized on the sale of the receivables were based in part on the previous carrying amount of the loans sold, allocated between the assets sold and the retained interests based on their relative fair values at the date of the sale. Because quoted market prices were not readily available for retained interests, the Company estimated their fair values using cash flow modeling techniques that incorporated management’s best estimates of key assumptions—loan default rates, loan prepayment rates, and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved.

 

The Company recognized the excess cash flows attributable to the retained interests over the carrying value of the retained interests as interest income over the life of the retained interests using the effective yield method. The Company updated the estimate of future cash flows on a quarterly basis. If upon evaluation there was a favorable change in estimated cash flows from the cash flows previously projected, the Company recalculated the amount of accretable yield and accounted for the change prospectively with the amount of accretion adjusted over the remaining life of the retained interests. Conversely, if upon evaluation there was an adverse change in either the amount or timing of the estimated future cash flows, an other-than-temporary impairment loss was recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income and the accretable yield was negatively adjusted.

 

Similarly, the carrying value of previously securitized loans is determined using assumptions with regard to loan prepayment and default rates. Using cash flow modeling techniques that incorporate these assumptions, the Company estimated total future cash collections expected to be received from these loans and determined the yield at which the resulting discount would be accreted into income. If, upon periodic evaluation, the estimate of the total probable collections is increased or decreased but is still greater than the sum of the original carrying amount less subsequent collections plus the discount accreted to date, and it is probable that collection will occur, the amount of the discount to be accreted is adjusted accordingly and the amount of periodic accretion is adjusted over the remaining lives of the loans. If, upon periodic evaluation, the estimate of amounts probable of collection is reduced and it is less than the original carrying value less collections plus the discount accreted to date, accretion would cease and an allowance for uncollectibility would be provided for through the allowance and provision for loan losses.

 

The Company adopted Statement of Position (“SOP”) 03-3, issued by the Accounting Standards Executive Committee, to determine the collectibility of previously securitized loans effective January 1, 2005. Please refer to Note One of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, on pages 32 and 34-35 for further discussion of SOP 03-3 and its expected effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

P ROPOSED A CQUISITION O F C LASSIC B ANCSHARES , I NC .

 

On December 29, 2004, the Company announced that it had signed a definitive agreement to acquire Classic Bancshares, Inc. (“Classic”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Classic Bank. Classic is a $340 million commercial bank that operates ten full-service branches located in Boyd, Carter, Greenup, and Johnson Counties in Kentucky and Lawrence County in Ohio. Upon completion of the merger, Classic Bank will merge with and into City National. The Company and Classic anticipate that the transaction, which will be accounted for as a purchase, will be completed in the second quarter of 2005, pending regulatory approvals, the approval of the shareholders of Classic and completion of other customary closing conditions. The directors of Classic have agreed to vote their shares in favor of the merger.

 

Under the terms of the agreement, shareholders of Classic will receive .9624 shares of the Company’s common stock (valued at $35.42, based on the Company’s December 28, 2004 closing price of $36.80 per share), and $11.08 in cash for each share of Classic common stock owned by them. The total transaction value is estimated at $77.4 million (assuming that outstanding stock options for 109,435 shares held by directors of Classic will be cashed out at the difference between the merger consideration and the exercise price of the options and stock options for 210,385 shares will be exercised prior to the closing).

 

Additional information concerning the agreement and the proposed merger is contained in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 29, 2004, which report is incorporated by reference. The terms of the agreement provide for the payment of a termination fee to the Company under certain circumstances.

 

3


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

F INANCIAL S UMMARY

 

The Company’s financial performance over the previous three years is summarized in the following table:

 

     2004

    2003

    2002

 

Net income (in thousands)

   $ 46,344     $ 43,694     $ 32,459  

Earnings per share, basic

   $ 2.79     $ 2.63     $ 1.93  

Earnings per share, diluted

   $ 2.75     $ 2.58     $ 1.90  

ROA*

     2.10 %     2.18 %     1.59 %

ROE*

     22.43 %     24.50 %     20.54 %

 

* ROA (Return on Average Assets) is a measure of the effectiveness of asset utilization. ROE (Return on Average Equity) is a measure of the return on shareholders’ investment.

 

As illustrated in the table above, the Company continued to experience favorable results in each of these measures of financial performance during 2004. The Company’s operating results in 2004 were positively affected by continued growth in noninterest income (see Noninterest Income and Expense ), specifically a $4.2 million, or 14.7%, increase in service charge revenues earned on depository relationships and increased Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”) revenue of $1.6 million, or 122.0%, over 2003 due to the Company’s strategic decision to increase its BOLI investment in late 2003. Also included in noninterest income was $5.5 million of income associated with the settlement of a derivative action brought against certain current and former directors and former executive officers of the Company and City National. Additionally, the Company continued to increase its trust fee income and insurance commissions. Noninterest expenses increased $1.8 million or 2.8% from 2003 primarily due to increased salaries and employee benefit costs which were partially offset by a decrease in the costs associated with the early extinguishments of debt. Additionally, the Company recorded no provision for loan losses during 2004. As more fully discussed under the caption Allowance and Provision for Loan Losses , the Company implemented a number of strategic initiatives to improve credit quality during 2001 and 2002. Due to these credit quality improvements, the Company continued to experience lower-than-anticipated loan losses and improving credit quality within certain segments of its loan portfolio. As a result of these trends and based on the Company’s analysis of its allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2004, the Company determined that it was appropriate to record no loan loss provision during 2004.

 

B ALANCE S HEET A NALYSIS

 

Total assets remained relatively unchanged from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2004, as growth within the Company’s loan portfolio was offset primarily by decreases in investment balances. Within the loan portfolio, the Company experienced significant growth in the residential real estate, home equity and commercial real estate loan categories during 2004. Strategically, the Company has continued to focus on increasing real estate secured lending through its real estate lending products as a means of improving the credit quality of the loan portfolio and maintaining acceptable profitability levels on its loan products. The outstanding balance of commercial real estate loans increased $49.5 million, or 14.1%, in 2004, as compared to 2003. The outstanding balance of home equity loans increased $25.7 million, or 9.1%, from $282.5 million at December 31, 2003 to $308.2 million at December 31, 2004. The outstanding balance of residential real estate loans increased $23.4, or 5.2%, from $446.1 million at December 31, 2003 to $469.5 million at December 31, 2004. As a result of the emphasis on real estate secured lending, the Company has chosen to de-emphasize unsecured consumer lending and to exit the indirect consumer lending product line. Both of these loan categories continued to experience declines in outstanding balances during 2004.

 

Total investment securities decreased $25.2 million, or 3.6%, from $705.0 million at December 31, 2003, to $679.8 million at December 31, 2004. The decrease in the securities portfolio in 2004 was related primarily to funding commercial real estate loans and to the maturities of securities.

 

Between 1997 and 1999, the Company originated and securitized $760 million in 125% loan-to-value junior-lien underlying mortgages in six separate pools known as City Capital Home Loan Trust 1997-1, 98-1, 98-2, 98-3, 98-4 and 99-1. The Company had a retained interest in the residual cash flows associated with these underlying mortgages after satisfying priority claims. Principal amounts owed to investors in the securitizations were evidenced by securities that were subject to redemption under certain circumstances. Once the notes were redeemed, the Company became the beneficial owner of the mortgage loans and recorded the loans as “Previously Securitized Loans” within the loan portfolio. At December 31, 2003, the Company had exercised its early redemption option with respect to four of these trusts. The Company exercised its early redemption option with respect to the remaining two trusts during 2004. As a result, carrying balances for “Retained Interests” at December 31, 2003 became classified as “Previously Securitized Loans.” The combined balances of Previously Securitized Loans and Retained Interests at December 31, 2003 of $93.1 million declined by $34.7 million to $58.4 million at December 31, 2004, a reduction of 37.2%.

 

Total deposits increased $36.0 million, or 2.2%, from $1.64 billion at December 31, 2003 to $1.67 billion at December 31, 2004. This increase was primarily attributable to noninterest- and interest-bearing demand deposits that increased $27.4 million, or 3.9%, during 2004.

 

4


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

Short-term debt balances decreased $23.2 million or 13.8% during 2004. This decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease of $18.2 million in security repurchase agreements due to decreases in certain public fund deposits. The Company does not depend on these types of funds, which are subject to significant fluctuations for funding or liquidity.

 

Long-term debt balances decreased $42.0 million, or 22.0%, from 2003 to 2004. This decrease was primarily due to the maturity of FHLB advances.

 

T ABLE T WO

A VERAGE B ALANCE S HEETS AND N ET I NTEREST I NCOME

(in thousands)

 

     2004

    2003

    2002

 
     Average
Balance


    Interest

   Yield/
Rate


    Average
Balance


    Interest

   Yield/
Rate


    Average
Balance


    Interest

   Yield/
Rate


 

ASSETS

                                                               

Loan portfolio (1):

                                                               

Residential real estate

   $ 454,890     $ 26,869    5.91 %   $ 455,971     $ 30,583    6.71 %   $ 533,544     $ 39,982    7.49 %

Home equity

     298,703       14,004    4.69       251,135       11,165    4.45       156,639       8,736    5.58  

Commercial real estate

     367,599       20,684    5.63       301,494       18,448    6.12       264,316       19,907    7.53  

Other commercial

     72,825       3,913    5.37       84,738       4,988    5.89       116,445       7,985    6.86  

Loans to depository institutions

     3,060       35    1.14       4,658       78    1.67       9,247       167    1.81  

Installment

     25,343       2,895    11.42       47,121       5,349    11.35       91,317       9,542    10.45  

Indirect

     16,599       1,823    10.98       35,449       3,868    10.91       66,039       5,130    7.77  

Credit card

     18,002       2,164    12.02       18,925       2,268    11.98       18,343       1,931    10.53  

Previously securitized loans

     80,151       13,712    17.11       20,426       4,549    22.27       —         —      —    
    


 

  

 


 

  

 


 

  

Total loans

     1,337,172       86,099    6.44       1,219,917       81,296    6.66       1,255,890       93,380    7.44  

Securities:

                                                               

Taxable

     666,863       30,110    4.52       517,728       21,267    4.11       462,142       19,871    4.30  

Tax-exempt (2)

     38,169       2,784    7.29       43,709       3,248    7.43       53,558       4,155    7.76  
    


 

  

 


 

  

 


 

  

Total securities

     705,032       32,894    4.67       561,437       24,515    4.37       515,700       24,026    4.66  

Deposits in depository institutions

     5,347       52    0.97       10,778       114    1.06       —         —      —    

Federal funds sold

     193       3    1.55       3,406       36    1.06       36,627       586    1.60  

Retained interests

     3,300       808    24.48       66,662       12,465    18.70       76,450       12,427    16.26  
    


 

  

 


 

  

 


 

  

Total interest-earning assets

     2,051,044       119,856    5.84       1,862,200       118,426    6.36       1,884,667       130,419    6.92  

Cash and due from banks

     43,616                    45,831                    59,415               

Premises and equipment

     34,804                    36,289                    40,455               

Other assets

     102,179                    89,549                    93,419               

Less: allowance for loan losses

     (19,790 )                  (26,877 )                  (35,792 )             
    


              


              


            

Total assets

   $ 2,211,853                  $ 2,006,992                  $ 2,042,164               
    


              


              


            

LIABILITIES

                                                               

Interest-bearing demand deposits

   $ 405,865     $ 2,599    0.64 %   $ 385,882     $ 2,174    0.56 %   $ 371,847     $ 2,105    0.57 %

Savings deposits

     279,174       1,456    0.52       287,823       1,606    0.56       299,958       2,823    0.94  

Time deposits

     662,068       19,152    2.89       627,741       18,757    2.99       672,030       24,422    3.63  

Short-term borrowings

     120,849       1,082    0.90       99,567       792    0.80       114,810       2,765    2.41  

Long-term debt

     201,218       7,582    3.77       109,947       8,456    7.69       124,874       10,184    8.16  
    


 

  

 


 

  

 


 

  

Total interest-bearing liabilities

     1,669,174       31,871    1.91       1,510,960       31,785    2.10       1,583,519       42,299    2.67  

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

     312,036                    292,075                    273,947               

Other liabilities

     24,072                    25,585                    26,687               

Shareholders’ equity

     206,571                    178,372                    158,011               
    


              


              


            

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

   $ 2,211,853                  $ 2,006,992                  $ 2,042,164               
    


 

        


 

        


 

      

Net interest income

           $ 87,985                  $ 86,641                  $ 88,120       
            

  

         

  

         

  

Net yield on earning assets

                  4.29 %                  4.65 %                  4.68 %
                   

                

                

 

(1) For purposes of this table, loans on nonaccrual status have been included in average balances.

 

(2) Computed on a fully federal tax-equivalent basis assuming a tax rate of approximately 35%.

 

5


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

N ET I NTEREST I NCOME

 

2004 vs. 2003

 

On a tax-equivalent basis, the Company’s net interest income increased by $1.3 million from 2003 to 2004 (Table Three). This increase was primarily attributable to a 10.1% increase in average earning assets, which was partially offset by a decrease in the net yield on earning assets of 52 basis points. The primary increase in average earning assets was in securities as the Company executed an interest rate risk management strategy put into place in the fourth quarter of 2003. This strategy was implemented to specifically offset anticipated reductions in net interest income from declining balances of retained interests and previously securitized loans. The increase in securities was funded primarily with fixed rate borrowings.

 

Average earning assets increased by $189 million in 2004 due to increases in average securities of $144 million and in average home equity and commercial real estate loan categories of $114 million. These increases were partially offset by decreases in average unsecured consumer and indirect lending products of $42 million and a reduction of average Federal funds sold and deposits in depository intermediaries of $9 million. The changes in average loan balances are attributable to the Company’s aforementioned strategic lending policies with emphasis being placed on real estate secured lending. This net increase in average earning assets was accompanied by an increase in average interest-bearing liabilities of $158 million as average short-term and long-term debt increased by $112 million and average interest-bearing deposits increased by $46 million. Average equity increased by $28 million and average noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased by $20 million.

 

As a continued result of the historically low interest rate environment, the Company experienced a declining net interest margin from 4.65% in 2003 to 4.29% in 2004. This was primarily caused by loan balances continuing to reprice downward while the cost of deposits remained relatively unchanged. The decrease was primarily due to the decrease in the yield on average residential real estate loans, which fell by 80 basis points, and decreasing yields on retained interests and previously securitized loans which decreased by 214 basis points on a combined basis. Partially offsetting these decreases, which resulted in a net decrease in the yield on average earning assets from 6.36% in 2003 to 5.84% in 2004, was an increase in the yield on average securities which increased by 30 basis points. Offsetting the overall decrease in average earning assets was the continued downward repricing trend of 19 basis points in 2004 in the Company’s interest-bearing liabilities. This decrease was primarily attributable to a 392 basis point decrease in the cost of long-term debt borrowings that was largely attributable to the Company’s early redemption of $57.5 million of 9.125% trust preferred securities.

 

Interest rates began to rise moderately during the second half of 2004. The Company believes that continued gradual increases in interest rates will favorably impact its net interest income while stable interest rates will result in the continued contraction of the Company’s net interest income due primarily to the declining balances of previously securitized loans. Pages 10-11 of this Annual Report to Shareholders under the caption “Risk Management” provide further analysis of the effects of various interest rate scenarios.

 

2003 vs. 2002

 

On a tax equivalent basis, the Company’s net interest income decreased by $1.5 million from 2002 to 2003 (Table Three). The decrease in net interest income is attributable to a 1.2% decrease in average earning assets and a decrease in the net yield on earning assets of 3 basis points. While earning assets decreased on average from 2002 to 2003, they generally decreased during 2002 and increased during 2003. As a result, earning assets at December 31, 2003, were approximately 12.7% higher than at December 31, 2002. The decrease in earning assets during 2002 was part of the Company’s strategic plan to improve underwriting standards and reduce credit losses by reducing loan balances to levels the Company believed to more appropriately reflect its desired risk profile. The slight decline in net interest margin was smaller than decreases experienced by many of the Company’s peers during a period of time when interest rates have been at historic lows.

 

Average earning assets fell by $23 million in 2003 due to decreases in average loans and retained interests of $46 million and in average Federal funds sold and deposits in depository intermediaries of $22 million. These declines were offset by an increase in average securities of $46 million (Table Two). The Company experienced significant decreases in balances related to unsecured consumer and indirect lending products as a result of the Company’s aforementioned strategic lending policies. This reduction in earning assets was accompanied by a reduction in average interest-bearing liabilities of $73 million as average interest-bearing deposits decreased by $43 million and average short-term borrowings and long-term debt fell by $30 million. The decline in average interest-bearing deposit balances between 2002 and 2003 was primarily due to a decline in time deposits during 2002. Average equity increased by $20 million and average noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased by $18 million. These noninterest-bearing liabilities replaced interest-bearing liabilities, partially mitigating the impact of lower earning assets. As a result, net interest income was increased by $461,000 during 2003 (Table Three).

 

6


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

Between 2001 and 2003, the U.S. economy experienced decreasing interest rates. For example, the prime rate fell by an average of 279 basis points between 2001 and 2003. As a result, the Company experienced declining interest income on loans and securities as existing assets with higher interest rates matured or were prepaid and new assets were originated at lower rates. The average yield on earning assets decreased from 6.92% in 2002 to 6.36% in 2003, a reduction of 56 basis points. This decrease was led by the yield on average loans, which fell by 78 basis points and the yield on average investment securities, which fell by 29 basis points. The Company’s interest-bearing liabilities repriced downward by 57 basis points which partially offset lower yields on earning assets. The decrease in the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was led by a 64 basis-point decline in the rate paid on time deposits and a 161 basis-point decline on the rate paid on short-term borrowings. Overall, the net interest margin declined 3 basis points between 2002 and 2003.

 

At December 31, 2003, the prime rate was the lowest that it has been since 1958. Because interest rates were quite low, the Company had limited opportunity to lower rates paid on deposit products while remaining competitive in its local markets. Had interest rates continued to remain at historically low levels, the Company anticipated further compression in its net interest margin as the Company’s variable-rate loans would continue to re-price at lower interest rates according to their terms and new loan volumes would be recorded at new low interest rates.

 

T ABLE T HREE

R ATE /V OLUME A NALYSIS OF C HANGES IN I NTEREST I NCOME AND E XPENSE

(in thousands)

 

     2004 vs. 2003     2003 vs. 2002  
    

Increase (Decrease)

Due to Change In:

   

Increase (Decrease)

Due to Change In:

 
     Volume

    Rate

    Net

    Volume

    Rate

    Net

 

Interest-Earning Assets

                                                

Loan portfolio:

                                                

Residential real estate

   $ (73 )   $   (3,641 )   $ (3,714 )   $   (5,813 )   $   (3,586 )   $ (9,399 )

Home equity

     2,115       724       2,839       5,270       (2,841 )     2,429  

Commercial real estate

     4,045       (1,809 )     2,236       2,800       (4,259 )     (1,459 )

Other commercial

     (701 )     (374 )     (1,075 )     (2,174 )     (823 )     (2,997 )

Loans to depository institutions

     (27 )     (16 )     (43 )     (83 )     (6 )     (89 )

Installment

     (2,472 )     18       (2,454 )     (4,618 )     425       (4,193 )

Indirect

     (2,057 )     12       (2,045 )     (2,376 )     1,114       (1,262 )

Credit card

     (111 )     7       (104 )     61       276       337  

Previously securitized loans

     13,301       (4,138 )     9,163       4,549       —         4,549  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Total loans

     14,020       (9,217 )     4,803       (2,384 )     (9,700 )     (12,084 )

Securities:

                                                

Taxable

     6,126       2,717       8,843       2,390       (994 )     1,396  

Tax-exempt (1)

     (412 )     (52 )     (464 )     (764 )     (143 )     (907 )
    


 


 


 


 


 


Total securities

     5,714       2,665       8,379       1,626       (1,137 )     489  

Deposits in depository institutions

     (57 )     (5 )     (62 )     114       —         114  

Federal funds sold

     (34 )     1       (33 )     (532 )     (18 )     (550 )

Retained interests

     (11,848 )     191       (11,657 )     (1,591 )     1,629       38  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Total interest-earning assets

   $ 7,795     $ (6,365 )   $ 1,430     $ (2,767 )   $ (9,226 )   $   (11,993 )
    


 


 


 


 


 


Interest-Bearing Liabilities

                                                

Interest-bearing demand deposits

   $ 113     $ 312     $ 425     $ 79     $ (10 )   $ 69  

Savings deposits

     (48 )     (102 )     (150 )     (114 )     (1,103 )     (1,217 )

Time deposits

     1,026       (630 )     396       (1,609 )     (4,057 )     (5,666 )

Short-term borrowings

     169       121       290       (367 )     (1,606 )     (1,973 )

Long-term debt

     7,020       (7,895 )     (875 )     (1,217 )     (510 )     (1,727 )
    


 


 


 


 


 


Total interest-bearing liabilities

   $ 8,280     $ (8,194 )   $ 86     $ (3,228 )   $ (7,286 )   $ (10,514 )
    


 


 


 


 


 


Net interest income

   $ (485 )   $ 1,829     $ 1,344     $ 461     $ (1,940 )   $ (1,479 )
    


 


 


 


 


 


 

(1) Fully federal taxable equivalent using a tax rate of approximately 35%.

 

7


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

N ONINTEREST I NCOME AND E XPENSE

 

2004 vs. 2003

 

The Company focuses much of its efforts on retail banking and enhancing its retail deposit franchise within its markets. The Company has approximately 150,000 households that maintain approximately 270,000 various types of accounts with the Company. As a result of this strong retail banking operation, service charge revenues have provided significant revenue growth for the Company over the past three years. During 2004, noninterest income (excluding security transactions) increased approximately $10.0 million or 25.7% from 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to the Company’s continued increase in service charge revenues of $4.2 million, or 14.7%, from $28.4 million during 2003 to $32.6 million during 2004. This increase reflects the Company’s emphasis on increasing its core deposit customer base by growing its retail banking franchise and the introduction of new products and services for depository customers.

 

During 2003, the Company made a strategic decision to increase its investment in Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”) to somewhat mitigate the rising costs of providing medical and retirement benefits for the Company’s employees. Primarily due to this increased investment, BOLI related revenues increased $1.6 million or 122.0% from 2003.

 

In addition to the Company’s continued success in expanding its depository relationships, the Company also continued to improve its income from trust fees and insurance commissions. Trust fee income increased $0.4 million, or 28.6%, from $1.6 million in 2003 to $2.0 million in 2004. Income generated from insurance commissions increased $0.3 million, or 10.8%, during 2004. These increases were attributable to the Company’s continued efforts to deliver its trust services and insurance products to new and existing bank customers.

 

Also included in noninterest income is $5.5 million of income from the settlement of litigation brought in December 2001 against certain current and former directors and former executive officers of the Company and City National. During 2003, the Company benefited from a $1.6 million legal settlement associated with the resolution of its claim against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) in the FDIC’s capacity as receiver for The First National Bank of Keystone. Excluding the impact of litigation proceeds and security transactions, total noninterest income increased $6.1 million, or 16.4%, from $37.3 million in 2003 to $43.4 million in 2004.

 

Noninterest expenses increased $1.8 million, or 2.8%, from $64.5 million in 2003 to $66.3 million in 2004. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in salaries and employee benefits of $3.2 million or 10.2%. Increases in healthcare costs and expenses associated with executive severances were primarily responsible for this increase. Due to continued increases in healthcare costs and increased claims, healthcare expenses for the Company’s employees increased $1.8 million. Also contributing to this increase was an increase of $1.6 million in severance costs to $3.3 million in 2004 from $1.7 million in 2003. Severance costs increased in connection with the Company’s obligation to five executive officers for severance payments as provided in their respective employment agreements.

 

Other expenses increased $0.8 million, or 9.2%, from 2003 to 2004 primarily as a result of increased business franchise taxes incurred by the Company.

 

Repossessed asset gains and losses and expenses decreased $0.6 million as a result of net gains of $0.7 million in 2003 compared with net gains of $0.1 million in 2004 realized on the disposal of other real estate properties. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to achieve similar results in future periods in its efforts to resolve and dispose of repossessed assets.

 

Professional fees and litigation expenses increased $0.4 million from $2.9 million in 2003 to $3.3 million in 2004. The increase was primarily related to legal expenses associated with the derivative action previously discussed.

 

Partially offsetting these increases in noninterest expenses was a decrease in the loss on early extinguishments of debt. In 2003, the Company reported a charge of $2.4 million primarily associated with the early redemption of $57.5 million of 9.125% trust preferred securities. During 2004, the Company reported a charge of $0.3 million associated with the repurchase in the open market of $2.0 million of its outstanding 9.15% junior subordinated debentures.

 

Depreciation expense declined by $0.5 million, or 10.9%, from 2003 to 2004 as the Company continued to be selective in limiting its capital expenditures to items deemed necessary to optimize customer service, lower other expenses, or increase revenues.

 

Also offsetting other noninterest expense increases was a decline in office supplies of $0.4 million, or 26.6%, from $1.4 million in 2003 to $1.0 million in 2004. This decrease was primarily attributable to the Company’s focus on the management and reduction of operational costs.

 

8


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

2003 vs. 2002

 

Of the $6.8 million, or 21.3%, increase in noninterest income (excluding investment securities transactions), increases in service charge revenues represented an increase of $4.9 million, or 20.9%, in 2003 as compared to 2002. Since 2001, the Company has emphasized increasing the number of its core deposit customers and has implemented a number of additional fee-based products and services for its retail customers.

 

In addition to the continued success of its efforts to grow depository relationships, the Company also experienced strong revenue growth in insurance revenues in 2003. Insurance revenues increased $0.6 million, or 30.9%, from $1.9 million in 2002 to $2.5 million in 2003 as the Company expanded the delivery of insurance products and service to new and existing retail and commercial customers. Fees derived from trust products and services also reflected sizeable growth during 2003, as trust fee revenues increased $0.2 million, or 18.1%, in 2003 as compared to 2002. As the Company has been able to grow its core customer base, it has been successful in cross-selling its insurance and trust products, resulting in strong revenue increases in both areas.

 

During 2003, the Company increased its investment in BOLI by $35.0 million. Investments in BOLI, which generate fee income as opposed to interest or dividend income, were increased during 2003 to help offset the rising costs of providing medical and retirement benefits to the Company’s employees. Largely as a result of the increased investment, revenues derived from BOLI increased $0.7 million, or 110.2%, from $0.6 million in 2002 to $1.3 million in 2003.

 

Also included in noninterest income is a $1.6 million settlement of litigation during the year involving the Company’s prior business relationship with The First National Bank of Keystone.

 

In addition to enhancing fee-based revenues, the Company has also placed strong emphasis on managing, and reducing, its operational costs. Despite a $2.4 million expense associated with retiring long-term debt (which is discussed further, below), total noninterest expense declined $4.7 million, or 6.8%, from $69.2 million in 2002 to $64.5 million in 2003. Significant expense reductions were achieved in virtually each expense classification.

 

Costs associated with salaries and employee benefits declined slightly during 2003, decreasing $0.8 million, or 2.6%, from $31.9 million in 2002 to $31.1 million in 2003. This decline corresponds to the reduction in the number of full-time equivalents (“FTEs”) employed by the Company over the two-year period. The number of FTEs declined by 36, or 4.9%, from 737 FTEs at December 31, 2002, to 701 FTEs at December 31, 2003.

 

Depreciation expense declined $1.3 million, or 23.3%, and occupancy/equipment expenses declined $0.6 million, or 9.6%, from 2002 to 2003 as the Company continued to be selective in limiting capital expenditures to only those items determined necessary to improve customer service, lower other expenses, or increase revenues.

 

Expenses associated with statement mailings declined $0.5 million, or 17.1%, during 2003 as a result of the Company’s renegotiation of contracts with external vendors to provide this service. Similarly, telecommunications costs declined $0.5 million, or 22.0%, from $2.4 million in 2002 to $1.9 million in 2003.

 

Repossessed asset losses and expenses reflected a net expense of $0.7 million in 2002, compared with net gains of $0.7 million in 2003 as a result of $1.0 million of gains realized on the disposal of other real estate owned properties during 2003.

 

Partially offsetting these declines in noninterest expense was a $2.4 million expense incurred during 2003 associated with the early extinguishment of long-term debt. During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company fully repaid all of its 9.125% junior subordinated debentures held by City Holding Capital Trust II. In turn, City Holding Capital Trust II retired its $57.5 million of outstanding trust-preferred securities. In completing the redemption of these securities, the Company recorded a $2.3 million expense to charge off the unamortized balance of issuance costs that had been capitalized at the time the trust-preferred securities were originally issued in 1998. Since the issuance of the securities, the issuance costs were being amortized over the life of the securities through interest expense using the effective yield method.

 

I NCOME T AXES

 

The Company recorded income tax expense of $24.4 million, $22.3 million and $16.7 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rates for 2004, 2003, and 2002 were 34.5%, 33.7%, and 34.0%, respectively. A reconciliation of the effective tax rate to the statutory rate is included in Note Twelve of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

9


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The Company’s net deferred tax assets decreased from $29.3 million at December 31, 2003 to $27.0 million at December 31, 2004. The components of the Company’s net deferred tax assets are disclosed in Note Twelve of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Realization of the most significant net deferred tax assets is primarily dependent on future events taking place that will reverse the current deferred tax assets. For example, realization of the deferred tax asset attributable to the allowance for loan losses is expected to occur as additional loan charge-offs, which have already been provided for within the Company’s financial statements, are realized or as the Company records negative loan loss provision expense, or no loan loss provision expense as it did during 2003 and 2004, respectively. The deferred tax asset associated with the allowance for loan losses has declined from $9.9 million at December 31, 2003 to $8.2 million at December 31, 2004. The deferred tax asset associated with the Company’s retained interests asset and previously securitized loans is expected to be realized as the Company recognizes income for financial statement purposes from these assets in future periods. The deferred tax asset associated with these assets was $9.7 million at both December 31, 2003 and 2004. The Company believes that it is more likely than not that each of the net deferred tax assets will be realized and that no valuation allowance is necessary as of December 31, 2004 or 2003.

 

R ISK M ANAGEMENT

 

Market risk is the risk of loss due to adverse changes in current and future cash flows, fair values, earnings, or capital due to adverse movements in interest rates and other factors, including foreign exchange rates and commodity prices. Because the Company has no significant foreign exchange activities and holds no commodities, interest rate risk represents the primary risk factor affecting the Company’s balance sheet and net interest margin. Significant changes in interest rates by the Federal Reserve could, in turn, result in similar changes in LIBOR interest rates, prime rates, and other benchmark interest rates that could affect the estimated fair value of the Company’s investment securities portfolio, interest paid on the Company’s short-term and long-term borrowings, interest earned on the Company’s loan portfolio, and interest paid on its deposit accounts.

 

The Company’s Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”) has been delegated the responsibility of managing the Company’s interest-sensitive balance sheet accounts to maximize earnings while managing interest rate risk. ALCO, comprised of various members of executive and senior management, is also responsible for establishing policies to monitor and limit the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk and to manage the Company’s liquidity position. ALCO satisfies its responsibilities through monthly meetings during which product pricing issues, liquidity measures, and interest sensitivity positions are monitored.

 

In order to measure and manage its interest rate risk, the Company uses an asset/liability management and simulation software model to periodically update the interest sensitivity position of the Company’s balance sheet. The model is also used to perform analyses that measure the impact on net interest income and capital as a result of various changes in the interest rate environment. Such analyses quantify the effects of various interest rate scenarios on projected net interest income. The Company’s policy objective is to avoid negative fluctuations in net income of more than 15% within a 12-month period, assuming an immediate increase or decrease of 300 basis points. The Company measures the long-term risk associated with sustained increases and decreases in rates through analysis of the impact to changes in rates on the economic value of equity. The Company’s policy is to avoid negative fluctuations in the economic value of equity of more than 15% in response to either an increase, or decrease, of 300 basis points. Due to the low level of interest rates at December 31, 2004 (the Federal funds target was 2.25%), the Company has chosen to reflect only its risk to a decrease of 100 basis points from current rates. Given the historically low level of rates at December 31, 2004, the Company believes that the probability of rate decreases beyond this amount is low. Also, the Company has chosen to reflect its risk to increases in rates as large as 400 basis points as this would imply a Federal funds target of 6.25%, which is within historical norms. At December 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with its policy.

 

10


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

The following table summarizes the sensitivity of the Company’s net income to various interest rate scenarios. The results of the sensitivity analyses presented below differ from the results used internally by ALCO in that, in the analyses below, interest rates are assumed to have an immediate and sustained parallel shock. The Company recognizes that rates are volatile, but rarely move with immediate and parallel effects. Internally, the Company considers a variety of interest rate scenarios that are deemed to be possible while considering the level of risk it is willing to assume in “worst-case” scenarios such as shown by the following:

 

   

Immediate

Basis Point Change

in Interest Rates


 

Estimated Increase

(Decrease) in

Net Income


   

Estimated Increase

(Decrease) in

Economic Value of

Equity


 
2004:                
    +400   +9.4 %   +8.8 %
    +300   +9.1     +9.5  
    +200   +6.7     +7.9  
    +100   +3.9     +4.9  
    -100   (9.7 )   (10.8 )
2003:                
    +500   +15.1 %   +19.9 %
    +300   +12.4     +15.8  
    +100   +5.2     +7.0  
    -50   (2.5 )   (3.2 )

 

These results are highly dependent upon assumptions made by management, including, but not limited to, assumptions regarding the manner in which interest-bearing demand deposit and saving deposit accounts reprice in different interest rate scenarios, pricing behavior of competitors, prepayments of loans and deposits under alternative rate environments, and new business volumes and pricing. As a result, there can be no assurance that the results above will be achieved in the event that interest rates increase or decrease during 2005 and beyond.

 

Based upon the results above, the Company believes that its net income is positively correlated with increasing rates as compared to the level of net income the Company would expect if interest rates remain flat. However, these results do not necessarily imply that the Company will experience increases in net income if market interest rates rise. In fact, the Company has significant exposure due to projected decreases in outstanding balances of previously securitized loans. Between January 2005 and December 2006, based upon the Company’s projected reductions in outstanding balances of previously securitized loans, assuming that market interest rates remain unchanged, and assuming that other loan and deposit balances remain unchanged, the Company anticipates a reduction in net interest income of approximately 8% and a corresponding reduction in net income of approximately 10%. The table above demonstrates that increases in the level of market interest rates could partially or fully offset this impact. For example, an immediate increase in interest rates of approximately 300 basis points would increase net income by approximately 10% over a 24-month horizon, assuming that the Company’s assumptions regarding such things as pricing behavior of competitors are fulfilled. Alternatively, the Company believes that loan growth of approximately 10% annually could mitigate the anticipated reduction in net interest income associated with declining balances of previously securitized loans.

 

L IQUIDITY

 

The Company evaluates the adequacy of liquidity at both the Parent Company level and at City National. At the Parent Company level, the principal source of cash is dividends from City National. Dividends paid by City National to the Parent Company are subject to certain legal and regulatory limitations. Generally, any dividends in amounts that exceed the earnings retained by City National in the current year plus retained net profits for the preceding two years must be approved by regulatory authorities. During 2003 and 2004, City National received regulatory approval to pay $123.9 million of cash dividends to the Parent Company, while generating net profits of $97.8 million. Therefore, City National will be required to obtain regulatory approval prior to declaring any cash dividends to the Parent Company throughout 2005. Although regulatory authorities have approved prior cash dividends, there can be no assurance that future dividend requests will be approved.

 

The Parent Company used cash obtained from the dividends received primarily to: (1) pay common dividends to shareholders, (2) remit interest payments on the Company’s junior subordinated debentures, and (3) fund repurchase of the Company’s common shares.

 

Over the next 12 months, the Parent Company has an obligation to remit interest payments approximating $2.6 million on the junior subordinated debentures held by City Holding Capital Trust. However, interest payments on the debentures can be deferred for up to five years under certain circumstances and dividends to shareholders can, if necessary, be suspended. The Parent Company will also be required to pay shareholders of Classic Bancshares, Inc. approximately $18.6 million under the definitive agreement for the acquisition of Classic Bancshares, Inc. Additionally, the Parent Company anticipates continuing the payment of dividends, which approximated $14.3 million during 2004 to common shareholders. In addition to these anticipated cash needs for 2005, the Parent Company has operating expenses and other contractual obligations, which are estimated to require $0.6 million of additional cash over the next 12 months. As of December 31, 2004, the Parent Company reported a cash balance of approximately $33.0 million and management believes that the Parent Company’s available cash balance,

 

11


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

together with cash dividends from City National, if approved, will be adequate to satisfy its funding and cash needs in 2005.

 

Excluding the interest and dividend payments discussed above, the Parent Company has no significant commitments or obligations in years after 2005 other than the repayment of its $28.8 million obligation under the debentures held by City Holding Capital Trust. However, this obligation does not mature until April 2028, or earlier at the option of the Parent Company. It is expected that the Parent Company will be able to obtain the necessary cash, either through dividends obtained from City National or the issuance of other debt, to fully repay the debentures at their maturity. Table Ten on page 20 of this Annual Report to Shareholders summarizes the contractual obligations of the Parent Company and City National, combined.

 

City National manages its liquidity position in an effort to effectively and economically satisfy the funding needs of its customers and to accommodate the scheduled repayment of borrowings. Funds are available to City National from a number of sources, including depository relationships, sales and maturities within the investment securities portfolio, and borrowings from the FHLB and other financial institutions. As of December 31, 2004, City National’s assets are significantly funded by deposits and capital. However, City National maintains borrowing facilities with the FHLB and other financial institutions that are accessed as necessary to fund operations and to provide contingency funding mechanisms. As of December 31, 2004, City National has the capacity to borrow an additional $594.3 million from the FHLB under existing borrowing facilities. City National maintains a contingency funding plan, incorporating these borrowing facilities, to address liquidity needs in the event of an institution-specific or systematic financial industry crisis. Additionally, City National maintains a significant percentage (91.2% or $620.0 million at December 31, 2004) of its investment securities portfolio in the highly liquid available-for-sale classification. As such, these securities could be liquidated, if necessary, to provide an additional funding source. City National also segregates certain mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, and other investment securities in a separate subsidiary so that it can separately monitor the asset quality of these primarily mortgage-related assets, which could be used to raise cash through securitization transactions or obtain additional equity or debt financing if necessary.

 

The Company manages its asset and liability mix to balance its desire to maximize net interest income against its desire to minimize risks associated with capitalization, interest rate volatility, and liquidity. With respect to liquidity, the Company has chosen a conservative posture and believes that its liquidity position is strong. As illustrated in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the Company generated $53.9 million of cash from operating activities during 2004, primarily from interest income received on loans and investments, net of interest expense paid on deposits and borrowings.

 

The Company’s net loan to asset ratio is 60.4% at December 31, 2004 as compared to its peers (defined as U.S. banks with total assets between $1 billion and $3 billion as published by the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council) of 67.3% as of September 30. 2004. The Company has obligations to extend credit, but these obligations are primarily associated with existing home equity loans that have predictable borrowing patterns across the portfolio. The Company has significant investment security balances with carrying values that totaled $679.8 million at December 31, 2004, and that greatly exceeded the Company’s non-deposit sources of borrowing which totaled $324.4 million.

 

The Company funds its assets primarily with deposits, which fund 75.6% of total assets as compared to 63.5% for its peers. Further, the Company’s deposit mix has a very high proportion of transaction and savings accounts that fund 45.7% of the Company’s total assets. And, the Company uses fewer time deposits over $100,000 than its peers, funding just 5.8% of total assets as compared to peers, which fund 12.6% of total assets with such deposits. And, as described under the caption Certificates of Deposit , the Company’s large CDs are primarily small retail depositors rather than public and institutional deposits.

 

I NVESTMENTS

 

The Company’s investment portfolio decreased from $705.0 million at December 31, 2003 to $679.8 million at December 31, 2004. This decrease was primarily related to funding the increase in commercial real estate loans and maturities of investment securities.

 

The investment portfolio remains highly liquid at December 31, 2004, with 91.2% of the portfolio classified as available-for-sale, including $10.9 million invested in an open-end, short-term investment fund. The investment portfolio is structured to provide flexibility in managing liquidity needs and interest rate risk, while providing acceptable rates of return.

 

Over the past three years, the Company has continued to increase the proportion of mortgage-backed securities included in the investment portfolio. The mortgage-backed securities in which the Company has invested are predominantly underwritten to the standards of, and guaranteed by, government-sponsored agencies such as FNMA and FHLMC.

 

12


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

T ABLE F OUR

I NVESTMENT P ORTFOLIO

 

     Carrying Values as of December 31

(in thousands)


   2004

   2003

   2002

Securities Available-for-Sale:

                    

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government corporations and agencies

   $ 23,695    $ 47,653    $ 112,715

States and political subdivisions

     31,652      27,856      23,491

Mortgage-backed securities

     494,428      434,449      133,558

Other debt securities

     41,045      34,681      51,616
    

  

  

Total debt securities available-for-sale

     590,820      544,639      321,380

Equity securities and investment funds

     29,214      101,024      124,004
    

  

  

Total Securities Available-for-Sale

     620,034      645,663      445,384

Securities Held-to-Maturity:

                    

States and political subdivisions

     12,504      17,635      31,657

Other debt securities

     47,236      41,663      40,753
    

  

  

Total Securities Held-to-Maturity

     59,740      59,298      72,410
    

  

  

Total Securities

   $   679,774    $   704,961    $   517,794
    

  

  

 

Included in equity securities and investment funds in the table above at December 31, 2004 are $12.2 million of Federal Home Loan Bank stock, $4.6 million of Federal Reserve Bank stock, and $10.9 million the Company had invested in Federated Prime Obligations Fund (“the Fund”). The Fund is an open-end fund traded on the NASDAQ National Market, which invests primarily in high quality, short-term, fixed income securities issued by banks, corporations, and the U.S. government. At December 31, 2004, there were no securities of any non-governmental issuers whose aggregate carrying or market value exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity.

 

     Maturing

 
     Within
One Year


    After One But
Within Five
Years


    After Five But
Within Ten Years


    After
Ten Years


 

(dollars in thousands)


   Amount

   Yield

    Amount

   Yield

    Amount

   Yield

    Amount

   Yield

 

Securities Available-for-Sale:

                                                    

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government corporations and agencies

   $ 3,273    5.31 %   $ 2,118    7.06 %   $ 15,194    7.53 %   $ 3,110    7.15 %

States and political subdivisions

     1,219    7.80       5,197    5.82       9,897    6.76       15,339    7.08  

Mortgage-backed securities

     14    6.50       10,839    5.18       3,492    5.92       480,083    4.51  

Other debt securities

     —      —         —      —         3,959    5.71       37,086    5.76  
    

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total debt securities available-for-sale

     4,506    5.99       18,154    5.58       32,542    6.90       535,618    4.68  

Securities Held-to-Maturity:

                                                    

States and political subdivisions

     3,051    7.71       5,377    7.29       3,561    6.84       515    6.45  

Other debt securities

     —      —         —      —         —      —         47,236    8.38  
    

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total debt securities held-to-maturity

     3,051    7.71       5,377    7.29       3,561    6.84       47,751    8.36  
    

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total debt securities

   $  7,557    6.68 %   $  23,531    5.97 %   $  36,103    6.89 %   $  583,369    4.98 %
    

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Weighted-average yields on tax-exempt obligations of states and political subdivisions have been computed on a fully federal tax-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 35%. Average yields on investments available-for-sale are computed based on amortized cost. Mortgage-backed securities have been allocated to their respective maturity groupings based on their contractual maturity.

 

13


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

L OANS

T ABLE F IVE

L OAN P ORTFOLIO

 

The composition of the Company’s loan portfolio at December 31 follows:

 

(in thousands)


   2004

   2003

   2002

   2001

   2000

Residential real estate

   $ 469,458    $ 446,134    $ 471,806    $ 631,103    $ 885,295

Home equity

     308,173      282,481      210,753      98,100      66,723

Commercial real estate

     400,801      351,284      273,904      284,759      348,922

Other commercial

     71,311      76,167      95,323      145,989      290,315

Loans to depository institutions

     —        —        20,000      —        —  

Installment

     18,145      33,651      64,181      125,236      224,897

Indirect

     10,324      24,707      48,709      86,474      135,589

Credit card

     18,126      18,979      19,715      18,594      16,418

Previously securitized loans

     58,436      58,788      —        —        —  
    

  

  

  

  

Gross loans

   $ 1,354,774    $ 1,292,191    $ 1,204,391    $ 1,390,255    $ 1,968,159
    

  

  

  

  

 

Since 2001, the Company has strategically focused on adjusting the overall mix of the loan portfolio, with an emphasis on increasing the outstanding balance of real estate secured loans and significantly reducing the proportion of unsecured and other consumer loan products. As a result, the Company has experienced significant growth in home equity loans over the past few years, which have increased $97.4 million, or 46.2%, in two years from $210.8 million at December 31, 2002, to $282.5 million at December 31, 2003, and $308.2 million at December 31, 2004. In addition to the home equity loan product, the Company targeted commercial real estate lending as an area for potential loan growth. During 2004, the Company continued to successfully attract new commercial relationships and increased the commercial real estate portfolio by $49.5 million, or 14.1%, from its December 31, 2003, reported balance.

 

As noted above, the Company’s focus has been to grow real estate secured lending. Management views real estate secured lending as providing the appropriate combination of both profitability and credit quality. In contrast, management believes that the indirect auto loans and unsecured consumer loans originated in previous years did not satisfy profitability and credit quality objectives and, as a result, the Company has chosen to de-emphasize these lending activities. Outstanding balances within the indirect and installment portfolios have declined significantly since 2001, partially offsetting the loan growth experienced in the aforementioned targeted growth areas.

 

As of December 31, 2004, the Company reported $58.4 million of loans classified as “previously securitized loans.” These loans were recorded as a result of the Company’s early redemption of the outstanding notes attributable to the Company’s six loan securitization trusts (see Retained Interests and Previously Securitized Loans ). As the outstanding notes were redeemed during 2004 and 2003, the Company became the beneficial owner of the remaining mortgage loans and recorded the carrying amount of those loans within the loan portfolio, classified as “previously securitized loans.” These loans are junior lien mortgage loans on one- to four-family residential properties located throughout the United States. The loans generally have terms of 25 or 30 years and have fixed interest rates. The Company expects this balance to continue to decline as borrowers remit principal payments on the loans. The following table shows the scheduled maturity of loans outstanding as of December 31, 2004:

 

(in thousands)


   Within One
Year


   After One
But Within
Five Years


   After Five
Years


   Total

Residential real estate

   $   103,624    $ 264,111    $   101,723    $ 469,458

Home equity

     60,154      143,164      104,855      308,173

Commercial real estate

     89,466      258,183      53,152      400,801

Other commercial

     38,807      31,146      1,358      71,311

Installment

     12,604      5,541      —        18,145

Indirect

     7,529      2,795      —        10,324

Credit card

     18,126      —        —        18,126

Previously securitized loans

     22,193      25,506      10,737      58,436
    

  

  

  

Total loans

   $ 352,503    $ 730,446    $ 271,825    $ 1,354,774
    

  

  

  

Loans maturing after one year with interest rates that are:

                    

Fixed until maturity

   $ 161,298              

Variable or adjustable

     840,973              
           

             

Total

          $ 1,002,271              
           

             

 

14


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

A LLOWANCE AND P ROVISION FOR L OAN L OSSES

 

Management systematically monitors the loan portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis to provide for probable losses inherent in the portfolio. Management assesses the risk in each loan type based on historical trends, the general economic environment of its local markets, individual loan performance, and other relevant factors. Individual credits are selected throughout the year for detailed loan reviews, which are utilized by management to assess the risk in the portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance. Due to the nature of commercial lending, evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance as it relates to these loan types is often based more upon specific credit review, with consideration given to the potential impairment of certain credits and historical charge-off percentages, adjusted for general economic conditions and other inherent risk factors. Conversely, due to the homogeneous nature of the real estate and installment portfolios, the portions of the allowance allocated to those portfolios are primarily based on prior loss history of each portfolio, adjusted for general economic conditions and other inherent risk factors.

 

In evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management considers both quantitative and qualitative factors. Quantitative factors include actual repayment characteristics and loan performance, cash flow analyses, and estimated fair values of underlying collateral. Qualitative factors generally include overall trends within the portfolio, composition of the portfolio, changes in pricing or underwriting, seasoning of the portfolio, and general economic conditions.

 

The allowance not specifically allocated to individual credits is generally determined by analyzing potential exposure and other qualitative factors that could negatively impact the adequacy of the allowance. Loans not individually evaluated for impairment are grouped by pools with similar risk characteristics and the related historical loss percentages are adjusted to reflect current inherent risk factors, such as unemployment, overall economic conditions, concentrations of credit, loan growth, classified and impaired loan trends, staffing, adherence to lending policies, and loss trends.

 

Determination of the allowance for loan losses is subjective in nature and requires management to periodically reassess the validity of its assumptions. Differences between net charge-offs and estimated losses are assessed such that management can timely modify its evaluation model to ensure that adequate provision has been made for risk in the total loan portfolio.

 

Following several years of credit quality deterioration within the Company’s loan portfolio, management dedicated significant time and resources to address and resolve credit quality concerns during 2001 and 2002. During these two years, the Company implemented a number of strategic initiatives designed to improve credit quality including tightening credit standards, establishing a loan workout division dedicated to resolving problem loans, and changing the overall mix of the loan portfolio to include a higher proportion of real estate secured loans, specifically home equity and commercial real estate loan products. Largely as a result of the changes made in 2001 and 2002, the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio has improved and continued to be strong in 2004, as the Company reported net charge-offs of $3.6 million in 2004 and $0.9 million in 2003, compared to $21.9 million in 2002. As a result of the strength in the Company’s credit quality in 2004, the allowance for loan losses declined $3.6 million, or 16.9%, from $21.4 million at December 31, 2003 to $17.8 million at December 31, 2004. Based on management’s analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses during 2004, management determined it was appropriate to record no loan loss provision during the year.

 

The allowance allocated to the commercial loan portfolio decreased $2.9 million, or 21.4%, from $13.6 million at December 31, 2003 to $10.7 million at December 31, 2004. This decline was due primarily to two factors. First, the Company’s improved commercial loan credit quality has resulted in decreased net commercial charge-offs that in turn has decreased the historical charge-off percentages applied to commercial credits not specifically reviewed. Second, the composition of the commercial loan portfolio has continued to transform since December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2004, commercial loans secured by real estate comprise 84.9% of the commercial loan portfolio, compared to 82.2% at December 31, 2003 and 74.2% at December 31, 2002. The increased proportion of real estate secured loans within the portfolio is believed to have improved the credit quality of this segment of the portfolio by providing the Company with enhanced collateral positions should borrowers begin to experience repayment problems.

 

The allowance allocated to the residential real estate portfolio increased $0.3 million, or 9.6%, from $2.9 million at December 31, 2003 to $3.2 million at December 31, 2004. This increase is the result of increased amounts of residential real estate loans outstanding. As of December 31, 2004, residential real estate loans were $308.2 million or a $25.7 million, or 9.1%, increase from the December 31, 2003 amount of $282.5 million. As reflected in Table Six, the Company reported recoveries of $0.6 million during 2004 and charge-offs of $1.2 million during the year. The charge-offs experienced during 2004 primarily related to residential real estate loans originated prior to 2001.

 

The allowance allocated to the consumer loan portfolio decreased $1.0 million, or 28.3%, from $3.6 million at December 31, 2003 to $2.6 million at December 31, 2004. This decline was primarily due to the declining balance of the

 

15


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

consumer loan portfolio. As noted previously, the Company has focused on originating real estate secured loans, as opposed to traditional consumer loans, which are generally either unsecured or secured by collateral that typically provides less of a recovery opportunity in the event a borrower defaults. Therefore, the Company has de-emphasized its indirect lending loan product line and has successfully utilized its home equity loan products to replace declines in traditional installment loan products. The outstanding balance of consumer loans, defined as installment, indirect, and credit card loans, declined $30.7 million, or 39.8%, from $77.3 million at December 31, 2003 to $46.6 million at December 31, 2004.

 

With the introduction of new depository account products and services in 2002 and the growth experienced in this product line from 2002 to 2004, the Company began allocating a portion of the allowance for loan losses to overdraft deposit accounts in 2003. Certain products offered by the Company permit customers to overdraft their depository accounts. While the Company generates service charge revenues for providing this service to the customer, certain deposit account overdrafts are not fully repaid by the customer resulting in losses incurred. The Company has provided for probable losses resulting from overdraft deposit accounts through its allowance for loan losses. As reflected in Table Six, the Company reported net charge-offs on depository accounts of $1.5 and $1.1 million during 2004 and 2003, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, the balance of overdraft deposit accounts was $2.0 million and is included in installment loans in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company allocated $1.5 million (see Table Eight) of its allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2004, to provide for probable losses resulting from overdraft deposit accounts.

 

As noted previously, as the Company has been able to redeem its retained interests in loan securitizations, it has added “previously securitized loans” to its loan portfolio. As discussed, the carrying value of the previously securitized loans incorporates an assumption for expected losses to be incurred over the life of these loans and, as a result, expected credit losses have already been provided for within the carrying value of these assets. Therefore, credit losses on previously securitized loans will first be applied against the carrying value of these loans and could adversely impact the yield earned on these loans. To the extent that credit losses exceed those amounts already provided for within the carrying value of these loans, the Company would then need to provide for such losses through the provision and allowance for loan losses. As of December 31, 2004, the Company believes that the credit losses provided for through the carrying value of previously securitized loans are adequate to provide for probable losses and an allocation of the allowance for loan losses to this segment of the portfolio is not required.

 

Based on the Company’s analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and in consideration of the known factors utilized in computing the allowance, management believes that the allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2004, is adequate to provide for probable losses inherent in the Company’s loan portfolio. Amounts to be recorded for the provision for loan losses in future periods will be dependent upon trends in loan balances including the composition of the loan portfolio, changes in loan quality and loss experience trends, and potential recoveries on previously charged-off loans.

 

16


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

T ABLE S IX

A NALYSIS OF THE A LLOWANCE FOR L OAN L OSSES

An analysis of changes in the allowance for loan losses follows:

 

(in thousands)


   2004

    2003

    2002

    2001

    2000

 

Balance at beginning of year

   $  21,426     $  28,504     $ 48,635     $ 40,627     $ 27,113  

Charge-offs:

                                        

Commercial, financial, and agricultural

     (2,040 )     (1,189 )     (19,063 )     (15,912 )     (5,081 )

Real estate-mortgage

     (1,164 )     (1,878 )     (7,360 )     (3,379 )     (1,703 )

Installment loans to individuals

     (2,071 )     (3,076 )     (4,814 )     (7,071 )     (7,839 )

Overdraft deposit accounts

     (2,614 )     (1,680 )     —         —         —    
    


 


 


 


 


Totals

     (7,889 )     (7,823 )     (31,237 )     (26,362 )     (14,623 )

Recoveries:

                                        

Commercial, financial, and agricultural

     1,809       3,244       5,671       2,144       890  

Real estate-mortgage

     576       1,811       1,849       513       179  

Installment loans to individuals

     792       1,300       1,786       1,586       1,588  

Overdraft deposit accounts

     1,101       590       —         —         —    
    


 


 


 


 


Totals

     4,278       6,945       9,306       4,243       2,657  
    


 


 


 


 


Net charge-offs

     (3,611 )     (878 )     (21,931 )     (22,119 )     (11,966 )

(Recovery of) provision for loan losses

     —         (6,200 )     1,800       32,178       25,480  

Balance of sold institution

     —         —         —         (2,051 )     —    
    


 


 


 


 


Balance at end of year

   $ 17,815     $ 21,426     $ 28,504     $ 48,635     $ 40,627  
    


 


 


 


 


As a Percent of Average Total Loans

                                        

Net charge-offs

     0.27 %     0.07 %     1.75 %     1.26 %     0.61 %

(Recovery of) provision for loan losses

     —         (0.51 )     0.14       1.83       1.29  

As a Percent of Nonperforming and Potential Problem Loans

                                        

Allowance for loan losses

     487.28 %     528.78 %     948.24 %     164.54 %     199.88 %

T ABLE S EVEN

N ON - ACCRUAL , P AST -D UE AND R ESTRUCTURED L OANS

Nonperforming assets at December 31 follows:

                                        

(in thousands)


   2004

    2003

    2002

    2001

    2000

 

Non-accrual loans

   $  2,147     $  2,140     $  2,126     $  25,957     $  16,676  

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more

     677       1,195       880       3,434       3,350  

Previously securitized loans past due 90 days or more

     832       717       —         —         —    

Restructured loans

     —         —         —         167       300  
    


 


 


 


 


     $ 3,656     $ 4,052     $ 3,006     $ 29,558     $ 20,326  
    


 


 


 


 


 

During 2003 and 2002, the Company recognized approximately $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of interest income received in cash on non-accrual and restructured loans, with no such interest income recognized during 2004. Approximately $0.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.6 million of interest income would have been recognized during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, if such loans had been current in accordance with their original terms. There were no commitments to provide additional funds on non-accrual, restructured, or other potential problem loans at December 31, 2004 and 2003.

 

Interest on loans is accrued and credited to operations based upon the principal amount outstanding. The accrual of interest income is generally discontinued when a loan becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest unless the loan is well collateralized and in the process of collection. When interest accruals are discontinued, interest credited to income in the current year that is unpaid and deemed uncollectible is charged to operations. Prior-year interest accruals that are unpaid and deemed uncollectible are charged to the allowance for loan losses, provided that such amounts were specifically reserved.

 

17


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

T ABLE E IGHT

A LLOCATION OF THE A LLOWANCE FOR L OAN L OSSES

 

A summary of the allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan type at December 31 follows:

 

     2004

    2003

    2002

    2001

    2000

 

(dollars in thousands)


   Amount

   Percent
of Loans
in Each
Category
to Total
Loans


    Amount

   Percent
of Loans
in Each
Category
to Total
Loans


    Amount

   Percent
of Loans
in Each
Category
to Total
Loans


    Amount

   Percent
of Loans
in Each
Category
to Total
Loans


    Amount

   Percent
of Loans
in Each
Category
to Total
Loans


 

Commercial, financial and agricultural

   $ 10,655    35 %   $ 13,554    33 %   $ 17,039    32 %   $ 32,428    31 %   $ 23,240    32 %

Real estate-mortgage

     3,151    62       2,874    61       7,363    57       9,493    52       5,546    49  

Installment loans to individuals

     2,552    3       3,558    6       4,102    11       6,714    17       11,841    19  

Overdraft deposit accounts

     1,457    —         1,440    —         —      —         —      —         —      —    
    

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

     $ 17,815    100 %   $ 21,426    100 %   $ 28,504    100 %   $ 48,635    100 %   $ 40,627    100 %
    

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

R ETAINED I NTERESTS AND P REVIOUSLY S ECURITIZED L OANS

 

Overview: Between 1997 and 1999, the Company completed six securitization transactions involving approximately $759.8 million of fixed rate, junior lien mortgage loans. The Company retained a financial interest in the securitizations comprised of: (1) the excess interest collected on the underlying collateral loans over the interest paid to third-party investors and administrative fees and (2) overcollateralization, or the excess principal balance of the underlying collateral loans over the principal balances payable to the third-party investors. Neither the outstanding balance of the collateral loans nor the outstanding principal owed to investors is included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Principal amounts owed to investors in the securitizations are evidenced by securities (“Notes”). The Notes were subject to redemption, in whole but not in part, at the option of the Company, as owner of the retained interests, or at the option of the Note insurer, on or after the date on which the related Note balance had declined to 5% or less of the original Note balance. Once the Notes were redeemed, the Company became the beneficial owner of the mortgage loans and recorded the loans as assets of the Company within the loan portfolio. During 2004 and 2003, the Notes outstanding on each of the Company’s six securitizations declined below the 5% threshold and the Company exercised its early redemption option on each of those securitizations. The Company redeemed four of these securitizations during 2003 and two during 2004.

 

Retained Interests: The value of the retained interests was determined using cash flow modeling techniques that incorporated key assumptions related to default, prepayment, and discount rates. Using these assumptions, the Company forecasted the amount and timing of future cash flows that it expected to receive based on the then current outstanding balance of collateral loans and amounts owed to investors. As of December 31, 2003, the Company reported retained interests in its securitizations of approximately $34.3 million. At December 31, 2004 the Company had no retained interests as all prior securitizations had been redeemed.

 

Interest income on retained interests was recognized over the life of the retained interest using the effective yield method. Using the effective yield approach, the Company recognized $0.8 million, $12.5 million, and $12.4 million of interest income in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. Comparatively, the Company received cash from the retained interests of $6.1 million and $2.7 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively, with no cash received during 2004.

 

Previously Securitized Loans: As the Company redeemed the outstanding Notes, no gain or loss was recognized in the Company’s financial statements and the remaining mortgage loans were recorded in the Company’s loan portfolio, classified as “previously securitized loans,” at the lower of

 

18


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

carrying value or fair value. Because the carrying value of the mortgage loans incorporated assumptions for expected prepayment and default rates, the carrying value of the loans was generally less than the actual outstanding balance of the loans. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company reported a carrying value of previously securitized loans of $58.4 million and $58.8 million, respectively, while the actual outstanding balance of these loans was $75.0 million and $70.1 million, respectively. The amount outstanding increased due to the Company’s redemption of $12.6 million from the 1999-1 and 1998-1 securitization pools that were partially offset by subsequent collections of the outstanding balances of redeemed securitizations. The previously securitized loans are accounted for in accordance with Practice Bulletin 6, Amortization of Discounts of Certain Acquired Loans, as further discussed in Note One of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, beginning on page 32 of this Annual Report to Shareholders. The difference (“the discount”) between the carrying value and actual outstanding balance of previously securitized loans of $16.6 million at December 31, 2004, is accreted into interest income over the remaining life of the loans. Through December 31, 2004, net credit losses on previously securitized loans were recorded against this discount and, therefore, impacted the yield earned on these assets as they were realized. Effective January 1, 2005, the Company adopted the provisions of SOP 03-3 as required. In accordance with SOP 03-3, if the discounted present value of estimated future cash flows declines below the recorded value of previously securitized loans, an impairment charge would be provided through the Company’s provision and allowance for loan losses in the period the impairment is determined.

 

During 2004 and 2003, the Company recognized $13.7 million and $4.5 million, respectively, of interest income on its previously securitized loans. Cash receipts for 2004 and 2003 are summarized in the following table:

 

(in thousands)


   2004

   2003

Principal receipts

   $ 49,129    $ 13,243

Interest income receipts

     12,412      3,143
    

  

Total cash receipts

   $ 61,541    $ 16,386
    

  

 

Key assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the Company’s retained interests and previously securitized loans as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, were as follows:

 

     December 31

 
     2004

    2003

 

Prepayment speed (CPR):

            

Through May 2004

   —       35 %

From June 2004 – May 2005

   40 %   30 %

From June 2005 – May 2006

   30 %   26 %

After May 2006

   20 %   20 %

Weighted-average cumulative defaults

   12.37 %   12.44 %

Weighted-average discount rate

   N/A     14.00 %

 

The projected cumulative default rate is computed using actual loan defaults experienced life-to-date plus forecasted loan defaults projected over the remaining expected life of the loans.

 

Summary: The following table summarizes the activity within the reported balance of retained interests and previously securitized loans during 2004 and 2003 and illustrates the impact on these balances of converting the retained interest asset to loans:

 

(in thousands)


  

Retained

Interests


   

Previously

Securitized
Loans


 

Balance at December 31, 2002

   $ 80,923     $ —    

Increase in value resulting from interest

     12,446       —    

Cash received on retained interests

     (6,078 )     —    

Reclassification due to redemption of outstanding Notes

     (52,971 )     52,971  

Cash remitted to Noteholders in redemption of outstanding Notes

     —         17,654  

Principal payments on mortgage loans received from borrowers

     —         (13,243 )

Discount accretion

     —         1,406  
    


 


Balance at December 31, 2003

   $ 34,320     $ 58,788  

Increase in value resulting from interest

     802       —    

Reclassification due to redemption of outstanding Notes

     (35,122 )     35,122  

Cash remitted to Noteholders in redemption of outstanding Notes

     —         12,560  

Principal payments on mortgage loans received from borrowers

     —         (49,129 )

Discount accretion

     —         1,095  
    


 


Balance at December 31, 2004

   $ —       $ 58,436  
    


 


 

19


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

C ERTIFICATES OF D EPOSIT

 

Scheduled maturities of time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more outstanding at December 31, 2004, are summarized in Table Nine. The Company has time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more totaling $128.9 million. These deposits are primarily small retail depositors of the bank as demonstrated by the average balance of time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more being less than $130,000.

 

T ABLE N INE

M ATURITY D ISTRIBUTION OF C ERTIFICATES OF D EPOSIT OF $100,000 OR MORE

 

(in thousands)


   Amounts

   Percentage

 

Three months or less

   $ 21,949    17 %

Over three months through six months

     13,027    10  

Over six months through twelve months

     14,078    11  

Over twelve months

     79,837    62  
    

  

Total

   $ 128,891    100 %
    

  

 

C ONTRACTUAL O BLIGATIONS

 

The Company has various financial obligations that may require future cash payments according to the terms of the obligations. Demand, both noninterest- and interest-bearing, and savings deposits are, generally, payable immediately upon demand at the request of the customer. Therefore, the contractual maturity of these obligations is presented in the following table as “less than one year.” Time deposits, typically CDs, are customer deposits that are evidenced by an agreement between the Company and the customer that specify stated maturity dates and early withdrawals by the customer are subject to penalties assessed by the Company. Short-term borrowings and long-term debt represent borrowings of the Company and have stated maturity dates. The Company is not a party to any material capital or operating leases as of December 31, 2004. The composition of the Company’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2004 is presented in the following table:

 

T ABLE T EN

C ONTRACTUAL O BLIGATIONS

 

     Contractual Maturity in

(in thousands)


   Less than
One Year


   Between
One and
Three
Years


   Between
Three and
Five Years


   Greater
than Five
Years


   Total

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

   $ 319,425    $ —      $ —      $ —      $ 319,425

Interest-bearing demand deposits (1)

     413,996      —        —        —        413,996

Savings deposits (1)

     282,972      —        —        —        282,972

Time deposits (1)

     331,217      231,486      148,303      15      711,021

Short-term borrowings (1)

     147,305      —        —        —        147,305

Long-term debt (1)

     6,328      95,966      41,518      29,282      173,094
    

  

  

  

  

Total Contractual Obligations

   $ 1,501,243    $ 327,452    $ 189,821    $ 29,297    $ 2,047,813
    

  

  

  

  

 

(1) – Includes interest on both fixed- and variable-rate obligations. The interest associated with variable-rate obligations is based upon interest rates in effect at December 31, 2004. The contractual amounts to be paid on variable-rate obligations are affected by market interest rates that could materially affect the contractual amounts to be paid.

 

20


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

O FF –B ALANCE S HEET A RRANGEMENTS

 

The Company has entered into certain agreements and transactions with unconsolidated entities that represent off-balance sheet arrangements that have had a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements and could have a significant impact in future periods. Most notably, as part of the Company’s loan securitization program in prior years, the Company created six securitization trusts that purchased loans from the Company and issued securities (“notes”) to third-party investors in the trusts. Because the trusts were structured as qualifying special purpose entities, the trusts, including the loans owned by the trusts and the notes issued by the trusts, are not included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. However, as fully disclosed under the caption Retained Interests and Previously Securitized Loans and in Note Six of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company retained a financial interest in the trusts, resulting in interest income reported in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. As of December 31, 2004, the notes outstanding on the original six trusts have been fully redeemed and the remaining loan balances from the trusts are recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

As disclosed in Note Fifteen of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has also entered into agreements to extend credit or provide conditional payments pursuant to standby and commercial letters of credit. While the outstanding commitment obligation is not recorded in the Company’s financial statements, the estimated fair value, which is not material to the Company’s financial statements, of the standby letters of credit is recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004.

 

C APITAL R ESOURCES

 

During 2004, Shareholders’ Equity increased $25.4 million, or 13.3%, from $190.7 million at December 31, 2003, to $216.1 million at December 31, 2004. This increase was primarily due to reported net income of $46.3 million for 2004, which was partially offset by cash dividends declared during the year of $14.6 million, common stock purchases of $5.9 million, and a $2.5 million reduction in accumulated other comprehensive income.

 

As previously disclosed, the Company has authorization to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in open market transactions, block transactions, private transactions, or otherwise at such times and prices as determined appropriate by management. During 2004, the Company acquired 197,040 shares of its common stock at an average price of $29.72 per share. Since the repurchase program was adopted in July 2002, the Company has purchased 617,740 shares of its common stock. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will continue to reacquire its common shares or to what extent the repurchase program will be successful.

 

The $2.5 million reduction in accumulated other comprehensive income was primarily attributable to a $2.5 million, net of tax, unrealized loss on the Company’s available for sale investment securities (see Note Four of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

 

During 2003, Shareholders’ Equity increased $25.3 million, or 15.3%, from $165.4 million at December 31, 2002 to $190.7 million at December 31, 2003. This increase was due to reported net income of $43.7 million for 2003, which was partially offset by cash dividends declared during the year of $13.3 million, common stock purchases of $3.3 million, and a $3.0 million reduction in accumulated other comprehensive income.

 

Regulatory guidelines require the Company to maintain a minimum total capital to risk-adjusted assets ratio of 8%, with at least one-half of capital consisting of tangible common shareholders’ equity and a minimum Tier I leverage ratio of 4%. Similarly, City National is also required to maintain minimum capital levels as set forth by various regulatory agencies. Under capital adequacy guidelines, City National is required to maintain minimum total capital, Tier I capital, and leverage ratios of 8.00%, 4.00%, and 4.00%, respectively. To be classified as “well capitalized,” City National must maintain total capital, Tier I capital, and leverage ratios of 10.00%, 6.00%, and 5.00%, respectively.

 

The Capital Securities issued by City Holding Capital Trust (“Trust I”) qualify as regulatory capital for the Company under guidelines established by the Federal Reserve Board. The Company’s regulatory capital ratios remained strong for both City Holding and City National as of December 31, 2004, as illustrated in the following table:

 

                 Actual

 
          

Well-

Capitalized


    December 31

 
     Minimum

      2004

    2003

 

City Holding:

                        

Total

   8.00 %   10.00 %   16.64 %   13.17 %

Tier I Risk-based

   4.00     6.00     15.47     11.93  

Tier I Leverage

   4.00     5.00     10.74     10.04  

City National:

                        

Total

   8.00 %   10.00 %   14.49 %   11.95 %

Tier I Risk-based

   4.00     6.00     13.32     10.72  

Tier I Leverage

   4.00     5.00     9.25     9.19  

 

In May 2004, the Federal Reserve Board proposed a rule that would continue to allow the inclusion of trust preferred securities issued by unconsolidated subsidiary trusts in Tier 1 capital, but with stricter limits. Under the proposal, after a three-year transition period, the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other capital elements would be limited to 25% of Tier 1 capital elements, net of goodwill. The amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit could be included in Tier 2

 

21


M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS ( CONTINUED )

 

capital, subject to restrictions. Based on the proposed rule, the Company expects to include all of its $28.0 million in trust preferred securities in Tier 1 capital. However, the provisions of the final rule could significantly differ from the proposed rule and there can be no assurance that the Federal Reserve Board will not further limit the amount of trust preferred securities permitted to be included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes. The trust preferred securities could be redeemed without penalty if they were no longer permitted to be included in Tier 1 capital.

 

L EGAL I SSUES

 

On December 31, 2001, the Company, its previous management team, and members of the Boards of Directors of both the Company and City National (the “defendants”) were named in a derivative action filed by a shareholder seeking to recover damages on behalf of the Company. In January 2004, the Company announced that a tentative settlement had been reached in this litigation. Subsequently, the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia, approved the settlement and the Company received insurance proceeds of approximately $5.5 million or $0.19 diluted earnings per share, net of tax, in April 2004.

 

In addition, the Company and City National are engaged in various legal actions in the ordinary course of business. As these legal actions are resolved, the Company or City National could realize positive and/or negative impact to its financial performance in the period in which these legal actions are ultimately decided. There can be no assurance that current actions will have immaterial results, either positive or negative, or that no material actions will be presented in the future.

 

R ECENT A CCOUNTING P RONOUNCEMENTS A ND D EVELOPMENTS

 

Note One, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements discusses recently issued new accounting pronouncements and their expected impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

F ORWARD -L OOKING S TATEMENTS

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements that are included pursuant to the safe harbour provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such information involves risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ from those projected in the forward-looking information. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, (1) the Company may incur additional loan loss provision due to negative credit quality trends in the future that may lead to a deterioration of asset quality, (2) the Company may not continue to experience significant recoveries of previously charged-off loans and the Company may incur increased charge-offs in the future, (3) the Company may experience increases in the default rates on previously securitized loans that would result in impairment losses, (4) the Company could have adverse legal actions of a material nature, (5) the Company may face competitive loss of customers, (6) the Company may be unable to manage its expense levels, (7) the Company may have difficulty retaining key employees, (8) changes in the interest rate environment may have results on the Company’s operations materially different from those anticipated by the Company’s market risk management functions, (9) changes in general economic conditions and increased competition could adversely affect the Company’s operating results, (10) changes in other regulations and government policies affecting bank holding companies and their subsidiaries, including changes in monetary policies, could negatively impact the Company’s operating results, and (11) the Company may experience difficulties growing loan and deposit balances. Forward-looking statements made herein reflect management’s expectations as of the date such statements are made. Such information is provided to assist shareholders and potential investors in understanding current and anticipated financial operations of the Company and is included pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date such statements are made.

 

22


R EPORT ON M ANAGEMENT S A SSESSMENT OF I NTERNAL C ONTROL O VER F INANCIAL R EPORTING

 

The management of City Holding Company is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The consolidated financial statements of City Holding Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and, as such, include some amounts that are based on the best estimates and judgments of management.

 

The management of City Holding Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting that is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The system of internal control over financial reporting is evaluated for effectiveness by management and tested for reliability through a program of internal audits with actions taken to correct potential deficiencies as they are identified. Because of inherent limitations in any internal control system, no matter how well designed, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected, including the possibility of the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control system can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time.

 

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based upon the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2004, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. Ernst & Young, LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on page 24.

 

February 23, 2005

 

/s/ Charles R. Hageboeck

     

/s/ David L. Bumgarner

Charles R. Hageboeck

     

David L. Bumgarner

President and Chief Executive Officer

     

Chief Financial Officer

 

23


R EPORT OF I NDEPENDENT R EGISTERED P UBLIC A CCOUNTING F IRM ON E FFECTIVENESS OF I NTERNAL C ONTROL O VER F INANCIAL R EPORTING

 

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the

Shareholders of City Holding Company

 

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Report on Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that City Holding Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). City Holding Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment about the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that City Holding Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, City Holding Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the COSO criteria.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 of City Holding Company and our report dated February 23, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Charleston, West Virginia

February 23, 2005

 

24


R EPORT OF I NDEPENDENT R EGISTERED P UBLIC A CCOUNTING F IRM ON C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS

 

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the

Shareholders of City Holding Company

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of City Holding Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of City Holding Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of City Holding Company and subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of City Holding Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 23, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Charleston, West Virginia

February 23, 2005

 

25


C ONSOLIDATED B ALANCE S HEETS

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

     December 31

 

(in thousands)


   2004

    2003

 

Assets

                

Cash and due from banks

   $ 52,854     $ 58,216  

Interest-bearing deposits in depository institutions

     3,230       5,122  
    


 


Cash and Cash Equivalents

     56,084       63,338  

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value

     620,034       645,663  

Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (approximate fair value at December 31, 2004 and 2003 - $64,476 and $63,667, respectively)

     59,740       59,298  
    


 


Total Investment Securities

     679,774       704,961  

Loans:

                

Residential real estate

     469,458       446,134  

Home equity

     308,173       282,481  

Commercial real estate

     400,801       351,284  

Other commercial

     71,311       76,167  

Installment

     18,145       33,651  

Indirect

     10,324       24,707  

Credit card

     18,126       18,979  

Previously securitized loans

     58,436       58,788  
    


 


Gross Loans

     1,354,774       1,292,191  

Allowance for loan losses

     (17,815 )     (21,426 )
    


 


Net Loans

     1,336,959       1,270,765  

Retained interests

     —         34,320  

Bank-owned life insurance

     50,845       49,214  

Premises and equipment

     34,607       35,338  

Accrued interest receivable

     9,868       10,216  

Net deferred tax assets

     27,025       29,339  

Other assets

     18,068       16,939  
    


 


Total Assets

   $ 2,213,230     $ 2,214,430  
    


 


Liabilities

                

Deposits:

                

Noninterest-bearing

   $ 319,425     $ 309,706  

Interest-bearing:

                

Demand deposits

     411,127       393,443  

Savings deposits

     281,466       278,117  

Time deposits

     660,705       655,496  
    


 


Total Deposits

     1,672,723       1,636,762  

Short-term borrowings

     145,183       168,403  

Long-term debt

     148,836       190,836  

Other liabilities

     30,408       27,739  
    


 


Total Liabilities

     1,997,150       2,023,740  

Shareholders’ Equity

                

Preferred stock, par value $25 per share: 500,000 shares authorized; none issued

     —         —    

Common stock, par value $2.50 per share: 50,000,000 shares authorized; 16,919,248 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, including 331,191 and 274,881 shares in treasury

     42,298       42,298  

Capital surplus

     55,512       57,364  

Retained earnings

     128,175       96,460  

Cost of common stock in treasury

     (8,761 )     (6,803 )

Accumulated other comprehensive income:

                

Unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale

     1,281       3,762  

Underfunded pension liability

     (2,425 )     (2,391 )
    


 


Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

     (1,144 )     1,371  
    


 


Total Shareholders’ Equity

     216,080       190,690  
    


 


Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

   $ 2,213,230     $ 2,214,430  
    


 


 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

26


C ONSOLIDATED S TATEMENTS OF I NCOME

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

     Year Ended December 31

(in thousands, except per share data)


   2004

    2003

    2002

Interest Income

                      

Interest and fees on loans

   $ 86,099     $ 81,296     $ 93,380

Interest on investment securities:

                      

Taxable

     30,110       21,267       19,871

Tax-exempt

     1,809       2,112       2,701

Interest on retained interests

     808       12,465       12,427

Interest on deposits in depository institutions

     52       114       —  

Interest on federal funds sold

     3       36       586
    


 


 

Total Interest Income

     118,881       117,290       128,965

Interest Expense

                      

Interest on deposits

     23,207       22,537       29,350

Interest on short-term borrowings

     1,082       792       2,765

Interest on long-term debt

     7,582       8,456       10,184
    


 


 

Total Interest Expense

     31,871       31,785       42,299
    


 


 

Net Interest Income

     87,010       85,505       86,666

(Recovery of) provision for loan losses

     —         (6,200 )     1,800
    


 


 

Net Interest Income After (Recovery of) Provision for Loan Losses

     87,010       91,705       84,866

Noninterest Income

                      

Investment securities gains (losses)

     1,173       (148 )     1,459

Service charges

     32,609       28,422       23,500

Insurance commissions

     2,733       2,467       1,884

Trust fee income

     2,026       1,575       1,334

Bank-owned life insurance

     2,931       1,320       628

Net proceeds from litigation settlements

     5,453       1,600       —  

Other income

     3,111       3,502       4,720
    


 


 

Total Noninterest Income

     50,036       38,738       33,525

Noninterest Expense

                      

Salaries and employee benefits

     34,245       31,070       31,915

Occupancy and equipment

     5,984       6,015       6,655

Depreciation

     3,932       4,411       5,749

Professional fees and litigation expense

     3,265       2,879       2,857

Postage, delivery, and statement mailings

     2,474       2,646       3,192

Advertising

     2,366       2,340       2,568

Telecommunications

     1,820       1,874       2,404

Insurance and regulatory

     1,323       1,266       1,656

Office supplies

     1,048       1,428       1,557

Repossessed asset (gains) losses and expenses

     (77 )     (691 )     664

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     263       2,388       —  

Other expenses

     9,690       8,872       9,993
    


 


 

Total Noninterest Expense

     66,333       64,498       69,210
    


 


 

Income Before Income Taxes

     70,713       65,945       49,181

Income tax expense

     24,369       22,251       16,722
    


 


 

Net Income

   $ 46,344     $ 43,694     $ 32,459
    


 


 

 

27


C ONSOLIDATED S TATEMENTS OF I NCOME ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

     Year Ended December 31

(in thousands, except per share data)


   2004

   2003

   2002

Basic earnings per common share

   $ 2.79    $ 2.63    $ 1.93
    

  

  

Diluted earnings per common share

   $ 2.75    $ 2.58    $ 1.90
    

  

  

Dividends declared per common share

   $ 0.88    $ 0.80    $ 0.45
    

  

  

Average common shares outstanding:

                    

Basic

     16,632      16,634      16,809
    

  

  

Diluted

     16,882      16,947      17,072
    

  

  

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

28


C ONSOLIDATED S TATEMENTS OF C HANGES IN S HAREHOLDERS ’ E QUITY

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

(in thousands)


  

Common
Stock

(Par

Value)


   Capital
Surplus


    Retained
Earnings


    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)


    Treasury
Stock


    Total
Shareholders’
Equity


 

Balances at December 31, 2001

   $ 42,232    $ 59,174     $ 41,152     $ 3,927     $ (136 )   $ 146,349  

Comprehensive income:

                                               

Net income

     —        —         32,459       —         —         32,459  

Other comprehensive income, net of deferred income tax expense of $326:

                                               

Unrealized gain on securities of $2,101, net of reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income of $68

     —        —         —         2,033       —         2,033  

Underfunded pension liability of $2,573, net of tax

     —        —         —         (1,544 )     —         (1,544 )
                                           


Total comprehensive income

                                            32,948  

Cash dividends declared ($0.45 per share)

     —        —         (7,535 )     —         —         (7,535 )

Exercise of 72,151 stock options

     66      (145 )     —         —         1,183       1,104  

Purchase of 302,400 common shares for treasury

     —        —         —         —         (7,473 )     (7,473 )
    

  


 


 


 


 


Balances at December 31, 2002

     42,298      59,029       66,076       4,416       (6,426 )     165,393  

Comprehensive income:

                                               

Net income

     —        —         43,694       —         —         43,694  

Other comprehensive loss, net of deferred income tax benefit of $2,030:

                                               

Unrealized loss on securities of $2,549, net of reclassification adjustments for losses included in net income of $346

     —        —         —         (2,198 )     —         (2,198 )

Increase in underfunded pension liability of $1,411, net of tax

     —        —         —         (847 )     —         (847 )
                                           


Total comprehensive income

                                            40,649  

Cash dividends declared ($0.80 per share)

     —        —         (13,310 )     —         —         (13,310 )

Exercise of 104,982 stock options

     —        (1,665 )     —         —         2,881       1,216  

Purchase of 118,300 common shares for treasury

     —        —         —         —         (3,258 )     (3,258 )
    

  


 


 


 


 


Balances at December 31, 2003

     42,298      57,364       96,460       1,371       (6,803 )     190,690  

Comprehensive income:

                                               

Net income

     —        —         46,344       —         —         46,344  

Other comprehensive loss, net of deferred income tax benefit of $1,678:

                                               

Unrealized loss on securities of $3,169, net of reclassification adjustments for losses included in net income of $688

     —        —         —         (2,481 )     —         (2,481 )

Increase in underfunded pension liability of $57, net of tax

     —        —         —         (34 )     —         (34 )
                                           


Total comprehensive income

                                            43,829  

Cash dividends declared ($0.88 per share)

     —        —         (14,629 )     —         —         (14,629 )

Exercise of 140,730 stock options

     —        (1,852 )     —         —         3,900       2,048  

Purchase of 197,040 common shares for treasury

     —        —         —         —         (5,858 )     (5,858 )
    

  


 


 


 


 


Balances at December 31, 2004

   $ 42,298    $ 55,512     $ 128,175     $ (1,144 )   $ (8,761 )   $ 216,080  
    

  


 


 


 


 


 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

29


C ONSOLIDATED S TATEMENTS OF C ASH F LOWS

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

     Year Ended December 31

 

(in thousands)


   2004

    2003

    2002

 

Operating Activities

                        

Net income

   $ 46,344     $ 43,694     $ 32,459  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

                        

Amortization and accretion

     1,572       2,053       1,621  

Depreciation of premises and equipment

     3,932       4,411       5,749  

(Recovery of) provision for loan losses

     —         (6,200 )     1,800  

Loss on early extinguishments of debt

     263       2,246       —    

Deferred income tax expense

     3,990       8,591       11,214  

Net periodic pension benefit

     —         (156 )     (322 )

Proceeds from loans sold

     —         —         2,929  

Realized gains on loans sold

     —         —         (445 )

Increase in retained interests

     (802 )     (6,368 )     (9,652 )

Increase in value of bank-owned life insurance

     (2,931 )     (1,320 )     (628 )

Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance

     846       —         —    

Realized investment securities (gains) losses

     (1,173 )     148       (1,459 )

Decrease in accrued interest receivable

     348       954       1,157  

(Increase) decrease in other assets

     (792 )     (575 )     4,739  

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities

     2,293       (5,266 )     2,901  
    


 


 


Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

     53,890       42,212       52,063  

Investing Activities

                        

Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities held to maturity

     4,963       13,714       4,994  

Purchases of securities held-to-maturity

     (5,701 )     (1,072 )     (40,783 )

Proceeds from sale of money market and mutual fund available-for-sale securities

     819,800       801,500       345,000  

Purchases of money market and mutual fund available-for-sale securities

     (747,500 )     (771,200 )     (460,000 )

Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale

     11,034       32,137       3,052  

Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available-for-sale

     152,114       215,734       165,014  

Purchases of securities available-for-sale

     (215,098 )     (485,219 )     (148,709 )

Net (increase) decrease in loans

     (17,417 )     (16,647 )     147,121  

Redemption of asset-backed notes

     (12,560 )     (17,654 )     —    

Investment in bank-owned life insurance

     —         (35,000 )     —    

Purchases of premises and equipment

     (3,201 )     (1,947 )     (373 )
    


 


 


Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities

     (13,566 )     (265,654 )     15,316  

Financing Activities

                        

Net increase (decrease) in noninterest-bearing deposits

     9,719       28,416       (3,359 )

Net increase (decrease) in interest-bearing deposits

     26,242       43,766       (123,356 )

Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings

     (78,220 )     21,466       19,733  

Proceeds from long-term debt

     35,000       145,836       10,000  

Repayment of long-term debt

     (22,200 )     (10,000 )     —    

Redemption of trust-preferred securities

     —         (57,500 )     —    

Purchases of treasury stock

     (5,858 )     (3,258 )     (7,473 )

Exercise of stock options

     2,048       1,216       1,104  

Dividends paid

     (14,309 )     (12,480 )     (5,037 )
    


 


 


Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities

     (47,578 )     157,462       (108,388 )
    


 


 


Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents

     (7,254 )     (65,980 )     (41,009 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

     63,338       129,318       170,327  
    


 


 


Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year

   $ 56,084     $ 63,338     $ 129,318  
    


 


 


 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

30


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

N OTE O NE

S UMMARY O F S IGNIFICANT A CCOUNTING A ND R EPORTING P OLICIES

 

Summary of Significant Accounting and Reporting Policies: The accounting and reporting policies of City Holding Company and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) conform with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles and require management to make estimates and develop assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and related footnotes. Actual results could differ from management’s estimates. The following is a summary of the more significant policies.

 

Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of City Holding Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

 

Description of Principal Markets and Services: The Company is a bank holding company headquartered in Charleston, West Virginia, and conducts its principal activities through its wholly-owned subsidiary, City National Bank of West Virginia (“City National”). City National is a retail and consumer-oriented community bank with 56 offices in West Virginia and Ohio. Principal activities include providing deposit, credit, trust, and insurance related products and services. The Company conducts its business activities through one reportable business segment—community banking.

 

Cash and Due from Banks: The Company considers cash, due from banks, and interest-bearing federal deposits in depository institutions as cash and cash equivalents.

 

Securities: Management determines the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase. If management has the intent and the Company has the ability at the time of purchase to hold debt securities to maturity, they are classified as investment securities held-to-maturity and are stated at amortized cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Debt securities for which the Company does not have the intent or ability to hold to maturity are classified as investment securities available-for-sale along with the Company’s investment in equity securities. Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in comprehensive income. Securities classified as available-for-sale include securities that management intends to use as part of its asset/liability management strategy and that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, resultant prepayment risk, and other factors.

 

The specific identification method is used to determine the cost basis of securities sold.

 

Loans: Loans, excluding previously securitized loans, which are discussed separately below, are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income.

 

Interest income on loans is accrued and credited to operations based upon the principal amount outstanding, using methods that generally result in level rates of return. Loan origination fees, and certain direct costs, are deferred and amortized as an adjustment to the yield over the term of the loan. The accrual of interest income generally is discontinued when a loan becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest. Other indicators considered for placing a loan on non-accrual status include the borrower’s involvement in bankruptcies, foreclosures, repossessions, litigation and any other situation resulting in doubt as to whether full collection of contractual principal and interest is attainable. When interest accruals are discontinued, unpaid interest recognized in income in the current year is reversed, and interest accrued in prior years is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Management may elect to continue the accrual of interest when the estimated net realizable value of collateral exceeds the principal balance and related accrued interest, and the loan is in process of collection.

 

Interest income during the period the loan is non-performing is recorded on a cash basis after recovery of principal is reasonably assured. Cash payments received on nonperforming loans are typically applied directly against the outstanding principal balance until the loan is fully repaid. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time, and the ultimate collectibility of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt.

 

Residential and home equity loans are generally subject to charge-off when the loan becomes 120 days past due, depending on the estimated fair value of the collateral less cost to dispose, versus the outstanding loan balance. Unsecured commercial loans are generally charged off when the loan becomes 120 days past due. Secured commercial loans are generally evaluated for charge-off when the loan becomes 180 days past due. Closed-end consumer loans are generally charged off when the loan becomes 120 days past due and open-end consumer loans are generally charged off when the loan becomes 180 days past due.

 

Retained Interests: When the Company sold certain receivables in securitizations of high loan-to-value loans, it retained a financial interest in the securitizations. The financial interest, or retained interest, was comprised of the estimated fair value of two components: (1) the excess cash flows

 

31


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

between interest collected on the underlying collateral loans minus interest paid to third-party investors plus fees paid for servicing, insurance, and trustee costs, and (2) over-collateralization. Gains recognized on the sale of the receivables were based in part on the previous carrying amount of the loans sold, allocated between the assets sold and the retained interests based on their relative fair values at the date of the sale. Because quoted market prices were not readily available for retained interests, the Company estimated their fair values using cash flow modeling techniques that incorporated management’s best estimates of key assumptions—loan default rates, loan prepayment rates, and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved.

 

The Company recognized the excess cash flows attributable to the retained interests over the carrying value of the retained interests as interest income over the life of the retained interests using the effective yield method. The Company updated the estimate of future cash flows on a quarterly basis. If upon evaluation there was a favorable change in estimated cash flows from the cash flows previously projected, the Company recalculated the amount of accretable yield and accounted for the change prospectively with the amount of accretion adjusted over the remaining life of the retained interests. Conversely, if upon evaluation there was an adverse change in either the amount or timing of the estimated future cash flows, an other-than-temporary impairment loss was recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income and the accretable yield was negatively adjusted.

 

Previously Securitized Loans: Amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as “previously securitized loans” represent the carrying value of loans beneficially owned by the Company as a result of having fully redeemed the obligations owed to investors (“notes”) in certain of the Company’s securitization transactions. The loans were recorded at their carrying values, which were comprised of the carrying value of the related retained interest asset underlying the securitization plus amounts remitted by the Company to the noteholders to redeem the notes. Because the carrying value of the retained interests incorporated assumptions with regard to expected prepayment and default rates on the loans and also considered the expected timing and amount of cash flows to be received by the Company, the carrying value of the retained interests and the carrying value of the loans was less than the actual outstanding balance of the loans. However, no gain or loss was recognized in the Company’s financial statements upon recording the loans into the Company’s loan portfolio and, as a result, the loans are recorded at a discount to their actual outstanding balances.

 

In accordance with Practice Bulletin 6, Amortization of Discounts of Certain Acquired Loans , issued by the Accounting Standards Executive Committee, the Company is accounting for the difference between the carrying value and the outstanding balance of these loans as an adjustment of the yield earned on these loans over their remaining lives. The discount is accreted to income over the period during which payments are probable of collection and are reasonably estimable. Additionally, the collectibility of previously securitized loans is evaluated over the remaining lives of the loans. If, upon evaluation, the estimate of the total probable collections is increased or decreased but is still greater than the sum of the original carrying amount less subsequent collections plus the discount accreted to date, and it is probable that collection will occur, the amount of the discount to be accreted is adjusted accordingly and the amount of periodic accretion is adjusted over the remaining lives of the loans. If, upon evaluation, the estimate of amounts probable of collection is reduced and it is less than the original carrying value less collections plus the discount accreted to date, accretion would cease and an allowance for uncollectibility would be provided for through the allowance and provision for loan losses.

 

The Company adopted Statement of Position 03-3, issued by the Accounting Standards Executive Committee, to determine the collectibility of previously securitized loans effective January 1, 2005 (see Recent Accounting Pronouncements). If upon evaluation of estimated collections and collections to date, the estimated total amount of collections is reduced below the original value of the loans, then the loans should be considered impaired for further evaluation. The Company did not note any impairment issues from the adoption of this Statement of Position. The Company continues to account for the discount in accordance with Practice Bulletin 6 noted above.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based upon an evaluation of individual credits in the loan portfolio, historical loan loss experience, current economic conditions, and other relevant factors. This determination is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change. The allowance for loan losses related to loans considered to be impaired is generally evaluated based on the discounted cash flows using the impaired loan’s initial effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral for certain collateral dependent loans. Loan losses are charged off against the allowance and recoveries of amounts previously charged are credited to the allowance. A provision for loan losses is charged to operations based on management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance after considering factors noted above, among others.

 

32


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

In assessing the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses, the Company stratifies the loan portfolio into seven major groupings, including commercial real estate, other commercial, residential real estate, home equity, and others. Historical loss rates, as adjusted, are applied against the then outstanding balance of loans in each classification to estimate probable losses inherent in each segment of the portfolio. Historical loss rates are adjusted using a systematic, weighted probability analysis of potential risk factors that could result in actual losses deviating from prior loss experience. Risk factors considered by the Company in completing this analysis include: (1) unemployment and economic trends in the Company’s markets, (2) concentrations of credit, if any, within any industries, (3) trends in loan growth, loan mix, delinquencies, losses or credit impairment, (4) adherence to lending policies and others. Each risk factor is assigned a rating of low, moderate/increasing, or high based on the Company’s assessment of the risk to loss associated with each factor. Each risk factor is then weighted to consider probability of occurrence.

 

Additionally, all loans within the portfolio are subject to internal risk grading. Risk grades are generally assigned by the primary lending officer and are periodically evaluated by the Company’s internal loan review process. Based on an individual loan’s risk grade, estimated loss percentages are applied to the outstanding balance of the loan to determine the amount of probable loss.

 

Premises and Equipment: Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed primarily by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, while improvements that extend the useful life of premises and equipment are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated remaining life of the asset.

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: Goodwill is the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of tangible and intangible assets. Goodwill is not amortized. Intangible assets with determinable useful lives, such as core deposits, are amortized over their estimated useful lives.

 

The Company performs an annual review for impairment in the recorded value of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets. Goodwill is tested for impairment between the annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that more than likely reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. An indefinite-lived intangible asset is tested for impairment between the annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change indicating that the asset might be impaired.

 

Income Taxes: The consolidated provision for income taxes is based upon reported income and expense. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company files a consolidated income tax return. The respective subsidiaries generally provide for income taxes on a separate return basis and remit amounts determined to be currently payable to the Parent Company.

 

Advertising Costs: Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.

 

Stock-Based Compensation: The Company has elected to account for its employee stock options using the intrinsic value method. Because the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized.

 

The alternative fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation (see Recent Accounting Pronouncements) requires the use of option valuation models, such as the Black-Scholes model for use in valuing employee stock options.

 

Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method. The fair value for the options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

     2004

    2003

    2002

 

Risk-free interest rate

   3.16 %   2.90 %   4.34 %

Expected dividend yield

   2.95 %   2.86 %   2.50 %

Volatility factor

   0.406     0.430     0.437  

Expected life of option

   5 years     5 years     5 years  

 

33


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of options is amortized to expense over the options’ vesting period. Pro forma net income, basic earnings per share, and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 were:

 

(in thousands)


   2004

    2003

    2002

 

Net income, as reported

   $ 46,344     $ 43,694     $ 32,459  

Pro forma stock-based employee compensation expense, net of tax

     (748 )     (1,213 )     (893 )
    


 


 


Net income, pro forma

   $ 45,596     $ 42,481     $ 31,566  
    


 


 


     2004

    2003

    2002

 

Basic earnings per share, as reported

   $ 2.79     $ 2.63     $ 1.93  

Pro forma stock-based employee compensation expense, net of tax

     (0.05 )     (0.08 )     (0.05 )
    


 


 


Basic earnings per share, pro forma

   $ 2.74     $ 2.55     $ 1.88  
    


 


 


     2004

    2003

    2002

 

Diluted earnings per share, as reported

   $ 2.75     $ 2.58     $ 1.90  

Pro forma stock-based employee compensation expense, net of tax

     (0.05 )     (0.08 )     (0.05 )
    


 


 


Basic earnings per share, pro forma

   $ 2.70     $ 2.50     $ 1.85  
    


 


 


 

Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options at the time of grant.

 

Basic and Diluted Earnings per Common Share: Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding increased by the number of shares of common stock which would be issued assuming the exercise of stock options and other common stock equivalents. The incremental shares related to stock options were 250,000, 313,000, and 263,000 in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Issued for Employees.” SFAS No. 123R requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be valued at fair value on the grant date and be expensed over the applicable vesting period. SFAS No. 123R is effective for the Company on July 1, 2005. The Company will transition to SFAS No. 123R using the “modified prospective application.” Under the “modified prospective application,” compensation costs will be recognized in the financial statements for all new share-based payments granted after July 1, 2005. Additionally, the Company will recognize compensation costs for the portion of previously granted awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered (“nonvested awards”) that are outstanding as of July 1, 2005 over the remaining requisite service period of the awards. The compensation expense to be recognized for the nonvested awards will be based on the fair value of the awards. The Company does not expect the impact of utilizing the “modified prospective application” to adopt SFAS No. 123R to be materially different from the pro forma information shown under “Stock-Based Compensation.”

 

In March 2004, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) released Issue 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.” EITF 03-1 provides guidance for determining whether impairment for certain debt and equity investments is other-than-temporary and the measurement of an impaired loss. Certain disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 were adopted in 2003 and the Company has complied with the new disclosure requirements in its consolidated financial statements. The recognition and measurement requirements of EITF 03-1 were initially effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. In September 2004, the FASB Staff issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) EITF 03-1-1 that delayed the effective date for certain measurement and recognition guidance contained in EITF 03-1. The FSP requires that entities continue to apply previously existing “other-than-temporary” guidance until a final consensus is reached. Management does not anticipate that issuance of a final consensus will materially impact the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

In December 2003, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer, which addresses the accounting for differences between the contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an investor’s initial investment in loans acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. SOP 03-3 requires that the excess of expected cash flows over contractual cash flows generally should be recognized prospectively through adjustment to the yield over the remaining life of the loans. SOP 03-3 requires that decreases in cash flows expected to be collected should be recognized as an impairment loss in the period the impairment is determined. Current practice permits the yield to decrease below the initial yield and to fall ultimately to zero, thereby spreading the effect of the change in estimate over the remaining life of the loans. SOP 03-3 is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after

 

34


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

December 15, 2004. For loans acquired in fiscal years beginning on or before December 15, 2004, and within the scope of existing accounting principles, the impairment provisions of SOP 03-3 are to be applied prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. The Company continues to evaluate the requirements of SOP 03-3 but does not believe that the adoption of SOP 03-3 will have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN 46”), an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to improve financial reporting of special purpose and other entities. FIN 46 provides guidance on how to identify a variable-interest entity (“VIE”) and determine when the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of a VIE are to be included in an entity’s consolidated financial statements. A VIE is a partnership, limited liability company, trust, or other legal entity that does not have sufficient equity to permit it to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or whose investors lack certain characteristics associated with owning a controlling financial interest. Business enterprises that represent the primary beneficiary of a VIE must consolidate the VIE in its financial statements. Prior to the issuance of FIN 46, consolidation generally occurred when an enterprise controlled another entity through voting interests. The consolidation provisions of FIN 46 applied to VIEs entered into after January 31, 2003, and for pre-existing VIEs in the first interim reporting period after December 15, 2003. In December 2003, the FASB reissued FIN 46 with certain modifications and clarifications. Application of this guidance was effective for interests in certain VIEs as of December 31, 2003. Application for all other types of entities will be required for periods ending after March 15, 2004, unless previously applied.

 

The Company applied the provisions of FIN 46 as of December 31, 2003, which resulted in the deconsolidation of City Holding Capital Trust from the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. City Holding Capital Trust is a subsidiary trust of the Company that was formed exclusively for the purpose of issuing mandatorily redeemable trust-preferred capital securities. Management has evaluated the applicability of FIN 46 on various investments and other business interests and has determined that the adoption of FIN 46 has no additional implications other than the deconsolidation of City Holding Capital Trust. The adoption of FIN 46 did not have a material impact on financial condition, the results of operations, or liquidity of the Company.

 

Statements of Cash Flows: Cash paid for interest, including interest paid for long-term debt and trust-preferred securities, was $31.8 million, $34.0 million and $47.5 million in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. During 2004 and 2003, the Company paid $19.5 million and $14.6 million, respectively, for income taxes. During 2002, the Company received net income tax refunds of $6.8 million.

 

Reclassifications: Certain amounts in the 2003 and 2002 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net income or shareholders’ equity.

 

N OTE T WO

A CQUISITIONS

 

On December 29, 2004, the Company announced that it had signed a definitive agreement to acquire Classic Bancshares, Inc. (“Classic”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Classic Bank. Classic is a $340 million commercial bank that operates ten full-service branches located in Boyd, Carter, Greenup, and Johnson Counties in Kentucky and Lawrence County in Ohio. The Company and Classic anticipate that the transaction, which will be accounted for as a purchase, will be completed in the second quarter of 2005, pending regulatory approvals, the approval of the shareholders of Classic and completion of other customary closing conditions.

 

Under the terms of the agreement, shareholders of Classic will receive .9624 shares of the Company’s common stock (valued at $35.42, based on the Company’s December 28, 2004 closing price of $36.80 per share), and $11.08 in cash for each share of Classic common stock owned by them. The total transaction value is estimated at $77.4 million (assuming that outstanding stock options for 109,435 shares held by directors of Classic will be cashed out at the difference between the merger consideration and the exercise price of the options and stock options for 210,385 shares will be exercised prior to the closing).

 

35


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

N OTE T HREE

R ESTRICTIONS ON C ASH AND D UE F ROM B ANKS

 

City National is required to maintain an average reserve balance with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond to compensate for services provided by the Federal Reserve and to meet statutory required reserves for demand deposits. The average amount of the reserve balance for the year ended December 31, 2004, was approximately $12.3 million.

 

N OTE F OUR

I NVESTMENTS

 

The aggregate carrying and approximate market values of securities follow. Fair values are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable financial instruments.

 

     December 31, 2004

(in thousands)


   Amortized
Cost


   Gross
Unrealized
Gains


   Gross
Unrealized
Losses


    Estimated
Fair Value


Securities available-for-sale:

                            

U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies

   $ 23,210    $ 495    $ (10 )   $ 23,695

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

     31,162      554      (64 )     31,652

Mortgage-backed securities

     493,967      1,959      (1,498 )     494,428

Other debt securities

     40,441      747      (143 )     41,045
    

  

  


 

Total Debt Securities

     588,780      3,755      (1,715 )     590,820

Equity securities and investment funds

     29,228      —        (14 )     29,214
    

  

  


 

Total Securities Available-for-Sale

   $ 618,008    $ 3,755    $ (1,729 )   $ 620,034
    

  

  


 

Securities held-to-maturity:

                            

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

   $ 12,504    $ 358      —       $ 12,862

Other debt securities

     47,236      4,441      (63 )     51,614
    

  

  


 

Total Securities Held-to-Maturity

   $ 59,740    $ 4,799    $ (63 )   $ 64,476
    

  

  


 

 

     December 31, 2003

(in thousands)


   Amortized
Cost


   Gross
Unrealized
Gains


   Gross
Unrealized
Losses


    Estimated
Fair Value


Securities available-for-sale:

                            

U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies

   $ 45,348    $ 2,305    $ —       $ 47,653

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

     27,136      748      (28 )     27,856

Mortgage-backed securities

     432,159      3,018      (728 )     434,449

Other debt securities

     34,114      686      (119 )     34,681
    

  

  


 

Total Debt Securities

     538,757      6,757      (875 )     544,639

Equity securities and investment funds

     100,923      119      (18 )     101,024
    

  

  


 

Total Securities Available-for-Sale

   $ 639,680    $ 6,876    $ (893 )   $ 645,663
    

  

  


 

Securities held-to-maturity:

                            

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

   $ 17,635    $ 753    $ (1 )   $ 18,387

Other debt securities

     41,663      3,890      (273 )     45,280
    

  

  


 

Total Securities Held-to-Maturity

   $ 59,298    $ 4,643    $ (274 )   $ 63,667
    

  

  


 

 

Certain investment securities owned by the Company were in an unrealized loss position (i.e., amortized cost basis exceeded the estimated fair value of the securities) as of December 31, 2004. The following table segregates those securities by the length of time the unrealized loss position has existed.

 

Less Than Twelve Months in Unrealized Loss Position

(in thousands)


   Amortized
Cost


   Estimated
Fair Value


   Unrealized
Loss


 

Securities available-for-sale:

                      

U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies

   $ 1,001    $ 991    $ (10 )

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

     5,578      5,514      (64 )

Mortgage-backed securities

     225,570      224,387      (1,183 )

Other debt securities

     12,643      12,511      (132 )

Equity securities and investment funds

     1,500      1,486      (14 )

Securities held-to-maturity:

                      

Other debt securities

     2,318      2,255      (63 )
    

  

  


Total

   $ 248,610    $ 247,144    $ (1,466 )
    

  

  


Greater Than Twelve Months in Unrealized Loss Position  

(in thousands)


   Amortized
Cost


   Estimated
Fair Value


   Unrealized
Loss


 

Securities available-for-sale:

                      

Mortgage-backed securities

   $ 16,783    $ 16,468    $ (315 )

Other debt securities

     1,520      1,509      (11 )
    

  

  


Total

   $ 18,303    $ 17,977    $ (326 )
    

  

  


 

36


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

Of the $1.8 million of gross unrealized losses as of December 31, 2004, $1.5 million, or 83.6%, of the total unrealized losses, is attributable to investments in mortgage-backed securities issued by FNMA, FHLMC, or private issuers who underwrite to similar standards. These unrealized losses are primarily the result of changes in interest rates, as opposed to the credit quality of the investment. The Company has both the intent and ability to hold the securities with unrealized losses for a sufficient time to recover the amortized cost.

 

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at December 31, 2004, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties. Mortgage-backed securities have been allocated to their respective maturity groupings based on their contractual maturity.

 

(in thousands)


   Cost

   Estimated
Fair Value


Securities Available-for-Sale

             

Due in one year or less

   $ 4,452    $ 4,506

Due after one year through five years

     17,700      18,154

Due after five years through ten years

     32,038      32,542

Due after ten years

     534,590      535,618
    

  

     $ 588,780    $ 590,820
    

  

Securities Held-to-Maturity

             

Due in one year or less

   $ 3,051    $ 3,092

Due after one year through five years

     5,377      5,565

Due after five years through ten years

     3,561      3,683

Due after ten years

     47,751      52,136
    

  

     $ 59,740    $ 64,476
    

  

 

Gross gains and gross losses realized by the Company from investment security transactions are summarized in the table below:

 

(in thousands)


   2004

   2003

    2002

Gross realized gains

   $ 1,173    $ 696     $ 1,459

Gross realized losses

     —        (844 )     —  
    

  


 

Investment security gains (losses)

   $ 1,173    $ (148 )   $ 1,459
    

  


 

 

The carrying value of securities pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes as required or permitted by law approximated $132.6 million and $157.4 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 

N OTE F IVE

A LLOWANCE FOR L OAN L OSSES

 

A summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses follows:

 

(in thousands)


   2004

    2003

    2002

 

Balance at January 1

   $ 21,426     $ 28,504     $ 48,635  

(Recovery of) provision for possible loan losses

     —         (6,200 )     1,800  

Charge-offs

     (7,889 )     (7,823 )     (31,237 )

Recoveries

     4,278       6,945       9,306  
    


 


 


Balance at December 31

   $ 17,815     $ 21,426     $ 28,504  
    


 


 


 

During 2003 and 2004, the Company experienced lower than anticipated losses and, generally, improving credit quality within certain segments of its loan portfolio. The Company also experienced greater than expected success in pursuing recoveries of previously charged-off loans. Additionally, the composition of the loan portfolio has changed significantly over the last two years as loans secured by real estate have increased from 73% of the portfolio at December 31, 2001 to 87% (excluding previously securitized loans) of the portfolio as of December 31, 2004. As a result of these factors and based on the Company’s analysis of the allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2004, the Company recorded no loan loss provision during 2004.

 

The recorded investment in loans on nonaccrual status and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest is included in the following table:

 

(in thousands)


   2004

   2003

Nonaccrual loans

   $ 2,147    $ 2,140

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more

     677      1,195

Previously securitized loans past due 90 days or more

     832      717
    

  

Total

   $ 3,656    $ 4,052
    

  

 

Information pertaining to impaired loans is included in the following table:

 

(in thousands)


   2004

   2003

Impaired loans with a valuation reserve

   $ 2,824    $ 3,335

Impaired loans with no valuation reserve

     832      717
    

  

Total impaired loans

   $ 3,656    $ 4,052
    

  

Valuation reserve on impaired loans

   $ 917    $ 1,069
    

  

 

The average recorded investment in impaired loans during 2004, 2003, and 2002 was $4.2 million, $3.3 million, and $9.4 million, respectively.

 

37


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

N OTE S IX

R ETAINED I NTERESTS AND P REVIOUSLY S ECURITIZED L OANS

 

Between 1997 and 1999, the Company completed six securitization transactions involving approximately $759.8 million of fixed rate, junior lien mortgage loans. As described in Note One, the Company retained a financial interest in each of the securitizations. Principal amounts owed to investors are evidenced by securities (“Notes”). The Notes were subject to redemption, in whole but not in part, at the option of the Company, as owner of the retained interests in the securitization transactions, or at the option of the Note insurer, on or after the date on which the related Note balance declined to 5% or less of the original Note balance. Once the Notes were redeemed, the Company became the beneficial owner of the mortgage loans and recorded the loans as assets of the Company within the loan portfolio. Through December 31, 2004, the outstanding Note balances of the six securitizations had declined below this 5% threshold and the Company exercised its early redemption options for each of these securitizations. The table below summarizes information regarding delinquencies, net credit losses, and outstanding collateral balances of securitized loans and previously securitized loans for the dates presented:

 

     December 31

(in thousands)


   2004

    2003

    2002

Loans Underlying Retained Interests (a):

 

             

Total principal amount of loans outstanding

   $ —       $ 59,822     $ 226,424

Principal amount of loans between 30 and 89 days past due

     —         2,664       6,873

Principal amount of loans between 90 and 119 days past due

     —         2,648       4,847

Net credit losses during the year

     —         5,116       14,994

Previously Securitized Loans:

                      

Total principal amount of loans outstanding

   $ 75,038     $ 70,087     $ —  

Discount

     (16,602 )     (11,299 )     —  
    


 


 

Net book value

   $ 58,436     $ 58,788     $ —  
    


 


 

Principal amount of loans between 30 and 89 days past due

   $ 5,091     $ 5,055     $ —  

Principal amount of loans between 90 and 119 days past due

     832       717       —  

Net credit losses during the year

     2,680       1,206       —  

 

(a) The outstanding balance of mortgage loans underlying retained interests and the related Note balances are not included in the consolidated balance sheets of the Company.

 

As the Company redeemed the outstanding Notes from its securitizations, no gain or loss was recognized in the Company’s financial statements and the remaining mortgage loans were recorded in the Company’s loan portfolio at carrying value. Because the book value of the mortgage loans incorporates assumptions for expected prepayment and default rates, the book value of the loans is generally less than the actual outstanding balance of the mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company reported a book value of previously securitized loans of $58.4 million and $58.8 million, respectively, whereas the actual outstanding balance of previously securitized loans at December 31, 2004 and 2003, was $75.0 million and $70.1 million, respectively. The difference (“the discount”) between the book value and actual outstanding balance of previously securitized loans is accreted into interest income over the life of the loans. Through December 31, 2004, net credit losses on previously securitized loans were first recorded against this discount and, therefore, impacted the yield earned on these assets. Effective January 1, 2005, the Company adopted the provisions of SOP 03-3 as required. In accordance with SOP 03-3, if the discounted present value of estimated future cash flows decline below the recorded value of previously securitized loans, an impairment charge would be provided through the Company’s provision and allowance for loan losses.

 

As of December 31, 2003, the Company reported retained interests in its securitizations of approximately $34.3 million. As noted above, during 2004 and 2003 the Company exercised its early redemption options for each of the six securitizations. As a result of these early redemptions, the book value of the Company’s retained interests was reduced by $88.1 million and previously securitized loans with an original carrying value of $118.3 million were recorded in the Company’s loan portfolio. The value of the retained interests and the previously securitized loans is determined using cash flow modeling techniques that incorporate key assumptions related to default, prepayment, and discount rates. Key assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the Company’s retained interests and previously securitized loans as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, were as follows:

 

     December 31

 
     2004

    2003

 

Prepayment speed (CPR):

            

Through May 2004

   —       35 %

From June 2004 – May 2005

   40 %   30 %

From June 2005 – May 2006

   30 %   26 %

After May 2006

   20 %   20 %

Weighted-average cumulative defaults

   12.37 %   12.44 %

Weighted-average discount rate

   N/A     14.00 %

 

 

38


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

Prepayment speed, or constant prepayment rate (CPR), represents the annualized monthly prepayment amount as a percentage of the previous month’s outstanding loan balance minus the scheduled principal payment. Weighted-average cumulative defaults represent actual loan defaults experienced life-to-date plus forecasted loan defaults projected over the remaining life of the collateral loans, divided by the original collateral balance. The weighted-average discount rate represents the interest rate used to compute the present value of the undiscounted future cash flows of the retained interests expected to be received by the Company.

 

Interest income on retained interests was recognized over the life of the retained interest using the effective yield method. Using the effective yield approach, the Company recognized $0.8 million, $12.5 million, and $12.4 million of interest income from the retained interests in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. Comparatively, the Company received $6.1 million and $2.7 million of cash from the retained interests during 2003 and 2002, respectively, with no cash received on this asset during 2004. During 2004 and 2003, the Company recognized $13.7 and $4.5 million, respectively, of interest income on the previously securitized loans and received cash of $61.5 million and $16.4 million, respectively, comprised of principal and interest payments received from borrowers.

 

N OTE S EVEN

P REMISES AND E QUIPMENT

 

A summary of premises and equipment and related accumulated depreciation as of December 31 is summarized as follows:

 

(in thousands)


  

Estimated

Useful Life


   2004

    2003

 

Land

        $ 8,385     $ 8,385  

Buildings and improvements

  

10 to 30 yrs.

     48,585       47,990  

Equipment

  

3 to 7 yrs.

     37,916       46,540  
         


 


            94,886       102,915  

Less accumulated depreciation

          (60,279 )     (67,577 )
         


 


Net premises and equipment

        $ 34,607     $ 35,338  
         


 


 

N OTE E IGHT

G OODWILL AND I NTANGIBLE A SSETS

 

At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the carrying amount of goodwill approximated $5.5 million. The Company completed its annual assessment of the carrying value of goodwill during 2004 and concluded that its carrying value was not impaired.

 

At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the carrying amount of core deposit intangibles, which are subject to amortization, approximated $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively. During 2004, 2003, and 2002, the Company recognized pre-tax amortization expense of $204,000, $270,000, and $311,000, respectively, associated with its core deposit intangibles. The estimated amortization expense for core deposit intangibles for each of the next five years is as follows:

 

(in thousands)


  

Projected

Amortization Expense


2005

   $ 204

2006

     204

2007

     204

2008

     151

2009

     —  
    

     $ 763
    

 

N OTE N INE

S CHEDULED M ATURITIES OF T IME C ERTIFICATES OF D EPOSITS OF $100,000 OR M ORE

 

Scheduled maturities of time certificates of deposits of $100,000 or more outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003, are summarized as follows:

 

(in thousands)


   2004

   2003

Within one year

   $ 49,054    $ 43,530

Over one through two years

     16,436      21,285

Over two through three years

     26,213      11,423

Over three through four years

     22,257      20,052

Over four through five years

     14,931      23,328
    

  

Total

   $ 128,891    $ 119,618
    

  

 

N OTE T EN

S HORT -T ERM B ORROWINGS

 

The components of short-term borrowings are summarized as follows:

 

(in thousands)


   2004

   2003

Security repurchase agreements

   $ 70,183    $ 88,403

Federal funds borrowed

     75,000      80,000
    

  

Total

   $ 145,183    $ 168,403
    

  

 

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase were sold to corporate and government customers as an alternative to available deposit products. The underlying securities included in repurchase agreements remain under the Company’s control during the effective period of the agreements.

 

As of December 31, 2004, the Company has an unused $20 million line of credit that will expire in September 2005.

 

39


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

Average and maximum amounts outstanding and weighted-average interest rate information is summarized as follows:

 

(dollars in thousands)


   2004

    2003

    2002

 

Avg. outstanding during the year:

                        

Securities repurchase agreements

   $ 79,385     $ 93,393     $ 105,831  

FHLB advances and Federal funds borrowed

     41,464       6,174       8,979  

Max. outstanding at any month end:

                        

Securities repurchase agreements

     106,171       103,609       116,084  

FHLB advances and Federal funds borrowed

     75,000       80,000       76,284  

Weighted-average interest rate:

                        

During the year:

                        

Securities repurchase agreements

     0.42 %     0.48 %     1.74 %

FHLB advances and Federal funds borrowed

     1.81 %     5.49 %     10.25 %

End of the year:

                        

Securities repurchase agreements

     0.79 %     0.32 %     1.18 %

FHLB advances and Federal funds borrowed

     2.09 %     1.29 %     4.66 %

 

N OTE E LEVEN

L ONG -T ERM D EBT

 

The components of long-term debt are summarized as follows:

 

(in thousands)


   Maturity

  

Weighted-
Average
Interest

Rate


    2004

   2003

FHLB Advances

   2005    2.09 %   $ —      $ 75,000

FHLB Advances

   2006    2.60 %     65,000      50,000

FHLB Advances

   2007    3.41 %     20,000      20,000

FHLB Advances

   2008    3.98 %     35,000      15,000

Junior subordinated debentures owed to City Holding Capital Trust

   2028    9.15 %     28,836      30,836
               

  

Total Long-term debt

              $ 148,836    $ 190,836
               

  

 

Through City National, the Company has purchased 121,998 shares of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock at par value as of December 31, 2004. Such purchases entitle the Company to dividends declared by the FHLB and provide an additional source of short-term and long-term funding, in the form of collateralized advances. Financing obtained from the FHLB is based, in part, on the amount of qualifying collateral available, specifically U.S. Treasury and agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, and residential real estate loans. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, collateral pledged to the FHLB included approximately $789.30 million and $463.9 million, respectively, in investment securities and one-to-four-family residential property loans. Therefore, in addition to the short-term (see Note Nine) and long-term financing discussed above, at December 31, 2004 and 2003, City National had an additional $594.3 million and $303.9 million, respectively, available from unused portions of lines of credit with the FHLB.

 

The Company had formed two statutory business trusts, City Holding Capital Trust and City Holding Capital Trust II, under the laws of the state of Delaware (“the Capital Trusts”). The Capital Trusts were created for the exclusive purpose of (i) issuing trust-preferred capital securities (“Capital Securities”), which represent preferred undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trusts, (ii) using the proceeds from the sale of the Capital Securities to acquire junior subordinated debentures (“Debentures”) issued by the Company, and (iii) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto.

 

During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company fully repaid all of its 9.125% Junior Subordinated Debentures held by City Holding Capital Trust II. In turn, City Holding Capital Trust II retired its $57.5 million of Capital Securities. In completing the redemption of these Securities, the Company recorded a $2.3 million charge against earnings to charge off the unamortized balance of issuance costs that were capitalized when the Trust II Capital Securities were originally issued in 1998. The issuance costs were being amortized over the life of the securities through interest expense using the effective yield method.

 

As discussed in Note One, the adoption of FIN 46 on December 31, 2003, required that the Company de-consolidate the Trust from its consolidated financial statements. Having adopted FIN 46, the outstanding balance of the Debentures is included in Long-Term Debt in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and interest expense on the Debentures is included in Interest on Long-Term Debt in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company’s interest payments on the Debentures are fully tax-deductible.

 

Distributions on the Debentures are cumulative. The Company has the option to defer payment of the distributions for an extended period up to five years, so long as the Company is not in default as to the terms of the Debentures. The Debentures, which have a stated interest rate of 9.15% and require semi-annual interest payments, mature in April 2028. The Debentures are redeemable prior to maturity at the option of the Company (i) on or after April 1, 2008, in whole at any time or in part from time-to-time, at declining redemption prices ranging from 104.58% to 100.00% on April 1, 2018, and thereafter, or (ii) in whole, but not in part, at any time within 90 days following the occurrence and during the continuation of certain pre-defined events.

 

40


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

The Capital Securities issued by the statutory business trusts qualify as Tier 1 capital for the Company under the Federal Reserve Board guidelines. In May 2004, the Federal Reserve Board proposed a rule that would continue to allow the inclusion of trust preferred securities issued by unconsolidated subsidiary trusts in Tier 1 capital, but with stricter limits. Under the proposal, after a three-year transition period, the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other capital elements would be limited to 25% of Tier 1 capital elements, net of goodwill. The amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit could be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to restrictions. Based on the proposed rule, the Company expects to include all of its $28.0 million in trust preferred securities in Tier 1 capital. However, the provisions of the final rule could significantly differ from the proposed rule and there can be no assurance that the Federal Reserve Board will not further limit the amount of trust preferred securities permitted to be included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes. The trust preferred securities could be redeemed without penalty if they were no longer permitted to be included in Tier 1 capital.

 

N OTE T WELVE

I NCOME T AXES

 

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

 

     December 31

(in thousands)


   2004

   2003

Deferred tax assets:

             

Retained interests and previously securitized loans

   $ 9,690    $ 9,725

Allowance for loan losses

     8,164      9,949

Net operating loss carryforward

     3,420      5,522

Accrued expenses

     3,209      2,292

Deferred compensation payable

     2,243      2,390

Underfunded pension liability

     1,616      1,594

Impaired investments

     962      1,056

Other

     594      769
    

  

Total Deferred Tax Assets

     29,898      33,297

Deferred tax liabilities:

             

Unrealized securities gains

     854      2,508

Deferred loan fees

     846      458

Other

     1,173      992
    

  

Total Deferred Tax Liabilities

     2,873      3,958
    

  

Net Deferred Tax Assets

   $ 27,025    $ 29,339
    

  

 

Significant components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:

 

(in thousands)


   2004

    2003

    2002

 

Current:

                        

Federal

   $ 20,672     $ 13,285     $ 4,042  

State

     (293 )     375       1,466  
    


 


 


Total current

     20,379       13,660       5,508  

Deferred:

                        

Federal

     1,653       7,570       12,201  

State

     2,337       1,021       (987 )
    


 


 


Total deferred

     3,990       8,591       11,214  
    


 


 


Income tax expense

   $ 24,369     $ 22,251     $ 16,722  
    


 


 


Income tax expense (benefit) attributable to securities transactions

   $ 469     $ (59 )   $ 584  
    


 


 


 

As of December 31, 2004, the Company has approximately $274,000 of federal net operating loss carryforwards, obtained via a previous acquisition, that expire in 2006. As of December 31, 2004, the Company has approximately $12.4 million and $25.6 million of state net operating loss carryforwards that expire in 2021 and 2022, respectively. The Company expects to realize the deferred tax asset associated with the net operating loss carryforwards through future operations. Additionally, the Company has a $0.5 million state income tax credit carryforward that expires in 2023.

 

A reconciliation of the significant differences between the federal statutory income tax rate and the Company’s effective income tax rate is as follows:

 

(in thousands)


   2004

    2003

    2002

 

Computed federal taxes at statutory rate

   $ 24,747     $ 23,081     $ 17,213  

State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

     1,329       907       311  

Tax effects of:

                        

Tax-exempt interest income

     (633 )     (739 )     (945 )

Bank-owned life insurance

     (1,026 )     (462 )     (220 )

Other items, net

     (48 )     (536 )     363  
    


 


 


Income tax expense

   $ 24,369     $ 22,251     $ 16,722  
    


 


 


 

N OTE T HIRTEEN

E MPLOYEE B ENEFIT P LANS

 

During 2003, shareholders approved the City Holding Company 2003 Incentive Plan (“the Plan”), replacing the Company’s 1993 Stock Incentive Plan that expired on March 8, 2003. Employees, directors, and individuals who provide service to the Company (collectively “Plan Participants”) are eligible to participate in the Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, or its delegate, may, from time-to-time, grant stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), or stock awards to Plan Participants. A maximum of 1,000,000

 

41


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

shares of the Company’s common stock may be issued upon the exercise of stock options and SARs and stock awards, but no more than 350,000 shares of common stock may be issued as stock awards. These limitations may be adjusted in the event of a change in the number of outstanding shares of common stock by reason of a stock dividend, stock split, or other similar event. Specific terms of options and SARs awarded, including vesting periods, exercise prices, and expiration dates are determined at the date of grant and are evidenced by agreements between the Company and the awardee. As of December 31, 2004, 107,500 stock options had been awarded pursuant to the terms of the Plan and no SARs or stock awards had been granted. The 90,000 stock options granted in 2003 (see table, below) were granted under the Company’s 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, prior to its expiration.

 

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information is presented below for the years ended December 31:

 

     2004

   2003

   2002

     Options

    Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price


   Options

    Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price


   Options

    Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price


Outstanding at January 1

     650,671     $ 13.19      732,412     $ 13.55      537,990     $ 15.04

Granted

     107,500       33.62      90,000       28.00      332,250       13.30

Exercised

     (140,730 )     12.77      (104,982 )     10.55      (72,151 )     13.18

Forfeited

     (15,134 )     30.38      (66,759 )     41.19      (65,677 )     24.93
    


        


        


     

Outstanding at December 31

     602,307     $ 16.51      650,671     $ 13.19      732,412     $ 13.55
    


        


        


     

Exercisable at end of year

     512,306     $ 13.48      620,667     $ 12.48      710,876     $ 13.31

Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year

   $ 10.24            $ 8.93            $ 4.71        

 

Additional information regarding stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2004, is provided in the following table:

 

Ranges of Exercise Prices


   No. of
Options
Outstanding


   Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price


   Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(Months)


   No. of
Options
Currently
Exercisable


  

Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price

of Options
Currently
Exercisable


  $5.75 - $8.03

   167,735    $ 5.78    73    167,735    $ 5.78

  $8.65 - $9.86

   15,351      9.42    78    15,351      9.42

$13.30 - $15.25

   235,055      13.30    85    235,055      13.30

$28.00 - $33.90

   184,166      30.96    105    94,165      28.32
    
              
      
     602,307                512,306       
    
              
      

 

The Company provides retirement benefits to its employees through the City Holding Company 401(k) Plan and Trust (“the 401(k) Plan”), which is intended to be compliant with Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) section 404(c). Any employee who has attained age 21 is eligible to participate beginning the first day of the month following employment. Unless specifically chosen otherwise, every employee is automatically enrolled in the 401(k) Plan and may make before-tax contributions of between 1% and 15% of eligible pay up to the dollar limit imposed by Internal Revenue Service regulations. The first 6% of an employee’s contribution is matched 50% by the Company. The employer matching contribution is invested according to the investment elections chosen by the employee. Employees are 100% vested in both employee and employer contributions and the earnings they generate. As of December 31, 2004, there were 15 investment options, including City Holding Company common stock, available under the 401(k) Plan.

 

The Company’s total expense associated with the retirement benefit plan approximated $494,000, $477,000, and $510,000 in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. The total number of shares of the Company’s common stock held by the 401(k) Plan as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 is 483,826 and 534,543, respectively. Other than the 401(k) Plan, the Company offers no postretirement benefits.

 

The Company also maintains a defined benefit pension plan (“the Defined Benefit Plan”) that covers approximately 300 current and former employees. The Defined Benefit Plan was frozen in 1999 subsequent to the Company’s acquisition of the plan sponsor. The Defined Benefit Plan maintains an October 31 year-end for purposes of computing its benefit obligations.

 

42


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

Primarily as a result of the interest rate environment over the past two years, the benefit obligation exceeded the estimated fair value of plan assets as of October 31, 2004 and 2003. In accordance with FASB Statement No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for Pension Plans , the Company has recorded a minimum pension liability of $2.1 million and $2.3 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, included in Other Liabilities within the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and a $2.4 million, net of tax, underfunded pension liability in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income within Shareholders’ Equity at both December 31, 2004 and 2003. The following table summarizes activity within the Defined Benefit Plan in 2004 and 2003:

 

     Pension Benefits

 

(in thousands)


   2004

    2003

 

Change in fair value of plan assets:

                

Fair value at beginning of measurement period

   $ 7,715     $ 7,234  

Actual gain on plan assets

     582       929  

Contributions

     259       —    

Benefits paid

     (512 )     (448 )
    


 


Fair value at end of measurement period

     8,044       7,715  

Change in benefit obligation:

                

Benefit obligation at beginning of measurement period

     (10,006 )     (8,270 )

Interest cost

     (642 )     (628 )

Actuarial gain (loss)

     3       (1,253 )

Benefits paid

     512       448  

Change in estimates

     —         (303 )
    


 


Benefit obligation at end of measurement period

     (10,133 )     (10,006 )
    


 


Funded status

     (2,089 )     (2,291 )

Unrecognized net actuarial gain

     4,148       4,121  

Unrecognized net obligation

     (107 )     (137 )

Other comprehensive loss

     (4,041 )     (3,984 )
    


 


Accrued Benefit Cost

   $ (2,089 )   $ (2,291 )
    


 


Weighted-average assumptions as of October 31:

 

       

Discount rate

     6.50 %     6.50 %

Expected return on plan assets

     8.50 %     8.50 %

 

The following table presents the components of the net defined benefit pension benefit:

 

     Pension Benefits

 

(in thousands)


   2004

    2003

    2002

 

Components of net periodic benefit:

                        

Interest cost

   $ 642     $ 628     $ 539  

Expected return on plan assets

     (785 )     (804 )     (831 )

Net amortization and deferral

     143       20       (30 )
    


 


 


Net Periodic Pension Benefit

   $ —       $ (156 )   $ (322 )
    


 


 


 

The Defined Benefit Plan is administered by the West Virginia Bankers Association (“WVBA”) and all investment policies and strategies are established by the WVBA Pension Committee. The policy established by the Pension Committee is to invest assets per target allocations, as detailed in the table below. The assets are reallocated periodically to meet these target allocations. The investment policy is reviewed periodically, under the advisement of a certified investment advisor, to determine if the policy should be revised.

 

        The overall investment return goal is to achieve a return greater than a blended mix of stated indices tailored to the same asset mix of the plan assets by 0.5%, after fees, over a rolling five-year moving average basis. Allowable assets include cash equivalents, fixed income securities, equity securities, exchange-traded index funds and guaranteed investment contracts. Prohibited investments include, but are not limited to, commodities and futures contracts, private placements, options, limited partnerships, venture capital investments, real estate and interest-only, principal-only, and residual tranche collateralized mortgage obligations. Unless a specific derivative security is allowed per the plan document, permission must be sought from the Pension Committee to include such investments.

 

In order to achieve a prudent level of portfolio diversification, the securities of any one company should not exceed more than 10% of the total plan assets, and no more than 25% of total plan assets should be invested in any one industry (other than securities of the U.S. government or U.S. government agencies). Additionally, no more than 20% of plan assets shall be invested in foreign securities (both equity and fixed).

 

The expected long-term rate of return for the plan’s assets is based on the expected return of each of the categories, weighted-based on the median of the target allocation for each class, noted in the table below. The allowable, target, and current allocation percentages of plan assets are as follows:

 

     Target
Allocation
2005


    Allowable
Allocation
Range


   

Percentage of Plan Assets

at October 31


 
         2004

    2003

 
                          

Equity securities

   70 %   40-80 %   72 %   70 %

Debt securities

   25 %   20-40 %   23 %   26 %

Other

   5 %   3-10 %   5 %   4 %
                

 

Total

               100 %   100 %
                

 

 

The following table summarizes the expected benefits to be paid in each of the next five years and in the aggregate for the five years thereafter:

 

        Plan Year Ending October 31


   Expected
Benefits to be
Paid


     (in thousands)

2005

   $ 492

2006

     588

2007

     610

2008

     619

2009

     673

        2010 through 2014

     3,630

 

The Company has entered into employment contracts with its executive officers. The employment contracts provide for, among other things, the payment of severance compensation in the event an executive officer either voluntarily or involuntarily terminates his employment with the Company for other than “Just Cause.” The cost of these benefits was accrued over the five-year service period for each executive and is included in Other Liabilities within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the liability was $5.1 million and $2.5 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, $3.3 million, $1.7, million and $0.8 million, respectively, was charged to operations in connection with these contracts. By early 2005,

 

43


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

three of these officers had in fact left the Company and will be paid severance compensation in accordance with the terms of each of their respective agreements.

 

Certain entities previously acquired by the Company had entered into individual deferred compensation and supplemental retirement agreements with certain current and former directors and officers. The Company has assumed the liabilities associated with these agreements, the cost of which is being accrued over the period of active service from the date of the respective agreement. The cost of such agreements approximated $256,000, $253,000, and $238,000 during 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. The liability for such agreements approximated $4.6 million and $4.5 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and is included in Other Liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

To assist in funding the above liabilities, the acquired entities had insured the lives of certain current and former directors and officers. The Company is the current owner and beneficiary of insurance policies with a cash surrender value approximating $5.3 at both December 31, 2004 and 2003 and is included in Other Assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

N OTE F OURTEEN

R ELATED P ARTY T RANSACTIONS

 

City National has granted loans to certain non-executive officers and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries, and to their associates. The loans were made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with third-party lending arrangements. The Company has no material related party transactions that would require disclosure.

 

N OTE F IFTEEN

C OMMITMENTS A ND C ONTINGENT L IABILITIES

 

The Company has entered into agreements with its customers to extend credit or provide a conditional commitment to provide payment on drafts presented in accordance with the terms of the underlying credit documents. Conditional commitments generally include standby and commercial letters of credit. Standby letters of credit represent an obligation of the Company to a designated third party contingent upon the failure of a customer of the Company to perform under the terms of the underlying contract between the customer and the third party. Commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate trade or commerce. Under the terms of a commercial letter of credit, drafts will be drawn when the underlying transaction is consummated, as intended, between the customer and a third party. The table below presents a summary of the contractual obligations of the Company resulting from significant commitments:

 

(in thousands)


   2004

   2003

Commitments to extend credit:

             

Home equity lines

   $ 137,582    $ 123,950

Credit card lines

     46,284      45,576

Commercial real estate

     41,691      32,947

Other commitments

     26,690      23,363

Standby letters of credit

     4,737      7,610

Commercial letters of credit

     1,329      1,763

 

Loan commitments and standby and commercial letters of credit have credit risks essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers and are subject to the Company’s standard credit policies. Collateral is obtained based on management’s credit assessment of the customer. Management does not anticipate any material losses as a result of these commitments.

 

On December 31, 2001, the Company, its previous management team, and members of the Boards of Directors of both the Company and City National (the “defendants”) were named in a derivative action filed by a shareholder seeking to recover damages on behalf of the Company. In January 2004, the Company announced that a tentative settlement had been reached in this litigation. Subsequently, the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia, approved the settlement and the Company received insurance proceeds of approximately $5.5 million or $0.19 diluted earnings per share, net of taxes, in April 2004.

 

During 2003, the Company received a net settlement of $1.6 million in resolution of its claim against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) in the FDIC’s capacity as receiver of the First National Bank of Keystone (“Keystone”). The settlement resolved federal court litigation the Company brought against the FDIC. With this settlement, the Company’s claims arising out of its business relationship with the failed Keystone bank were resolved.

 

In addition, the Company and City National are involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. As these legal actions are resolved, the Company or City National could realize positive and/or negative impact to its financial performance in the period in which these legal actions are ultimately decided. There can be no assurance that current actions will have immaterial results, either positive or negative, or that no material actions will be presented in the future.

 

44


N OTES TO C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY AND S UBSIDIARIES

 

N OTE S IXTEEN

P REFERRED S TOCK A ND S HAREHOLDER R IGHTS P LAN

 

The Company’s Board of Directors has the authority to issue preferred stock, and to fix the designation, preferences, rights, dividends, and all other attributes of such preferred stock, without any vote or action by the shareholders. As of December 31, 2004, no such shares are outstanding, nor are any expected to be issued, except as might occur pursuant to the Stock Rights Plan discussed below.

 

The Company’s Stock Rights Plan provides that each share of common stock carries with it one right. The rights would be exercisable only if a person or group, as defined, acquired 15% or more of the Company’s common stock, or announces a tender offer for such stock. Under conditions described in the Stock Rights Plan, holders of rights could acquire shares of preferred stock or additional shares of the Company’s common stock—or in the event of a 50% or more change in control, shares of common stock of the acquirer. The value of shares acquired under the plan would equal twice the exercise price.

 

N OTE S EVENTEEN

R EGULATORY R EQUIREMENTS A ND C APITAL R ATIOS

 

The principal source of income and cash for City Holding (the “Parent Company”) are dividends from City National. Dividends paid by City National to the Parent Company are subject to certain legal and regulatory limitations. Generally, any dividends in amounts that exceed the earnings retained by City National in the current year plus retained net profits for the preceding two years must be approved by regulatory authorities. During 2003 and 2004, City National received regulatory approval to pay $123.9 million in cash dividends to the Parent Company, while generating net profits of $97.8 million. Therefore, City National will be required to obtain regulatory approval prior to declaring any cash dividends to the Parent Company throughout 2005. Although regulatory authorities have approved prior cash dividends, there can be no assurance that future dividend requests will be approved.

 

The Parent Company used cash obtained from the dividends received primarily to: (1) pay common dividends to shareholders, (2) remit interest payments on the Company’s trust-preferred securities, and (3) fund the repurchase of the Company’s common shares. As of December 31, 2004, the Parent Company reported a cash balance of approximately $33.0 million. Management believes that the Parent Company’s available cash balance, together with cash dividends from City National, if approved, is adequate to satisfy its funding and cash needs in 2005.

 

The Company, including City National, is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the various banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, action by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and City National must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and City National’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

 

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and City National to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2004, that the Company and City National met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject.

 

As of December 31, 2004, the most recent notifications from banking regulatory agencies categorized the Company and City National as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since these notifications that management believes have changed the institutions’ categories. The Company’s and City National’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table.

 

     2004     2003    

Well

Capitalized
Ratio


   

Minimum
Ratio


 

(dollars in thousands)


   Amount

   Ratio

    Amount

   Ratio

     

Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):

                                      

Consolidated

   $ 253,655    16.6 %   $ 226,232    13.2 %   10.0 %   8.0 %

City National

     220,021    14.5       208,035    12.0     10.0     8.0  

Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):

                                      

Consolidated

     235,840    15.5       204,806    11.9     6.0     4.0  

City National

     202,207    13.3       186,608    10.7     6.0     4.0  

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets):

                                      

Consolidated

     235,840    10.7       204,806    10.0     5.0     4.0  

City National

     202,207    9.3       186,608    9.2     5.0     4.0  

 

45


N OTES T O C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY A ND S UBSIDIARIES

 

N OTE E IGHTEEN

F AIR V ALUES OF F INANCIAL I NSTRUMENTS

 

FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments , requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. Statement No. 107 excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.

 

The following table represents the estimates of fair value of financial instruments:

 

     Fair Value of Financial Instruments
     2004

   2003

(in thousands)


   Carrying
Amount


   Fair
Value


   Carrying
Amount


   Fair
Value


Assets:

                           

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 56,084    $ 56,084    $ 63,338    $ 63,338

Securities available-for-sale

     620,034      620,034      645,663      645,663

Securities held-to-maturity

     59,740      64,476      59,298      63,667

Net loans

     1,336,959      1,380,425      1,270,765      1,337,692

Retained interests

     —        —        34,320      40,010

Liabilities:

                           

Deposits

     1,672,723      1,692,410      1,636,762      1,670,343

Short-term borrowings

     145,183      143,646      168,403      166,688

Long-term debt

     148,836      155,012      190,836      191,771

 

The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating fair value amounts for financial instruments:

 

Cash and cash equivalents : Due to their short-term nature, the carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximate fair value.

 

Securities : The fair value of securities, both available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, are generally based on quoted market prices.

 

Net loans : The fair value of the loan portfolio is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses at interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The carrying value of accrued interest approximates its fair value.

 

Retained interests : The fair value of the retained interests is determined using cash flow modeling techniques that incorporate key assumptions related to default, prepayment, and discount rates.

 

Deposits : The fair values of demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest-bearing checking, regular savings, and other money market demand accounts) are, by definition, equal to their carrying values. Fair values for certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation, one that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregate expected monthly maturities of time deposits.

 

Short-term borrowings : Securities sold under agreements to repurchase represent borrowings with original maturities of less than 90 days. The carrying amount of advances from the FHLB and borrowings under repurchase agreements approximate their fair values.

 

Long-term debt : The fair value of long-term borrowings is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

 

Commitments and letters of credit : The fair values of commitments are estimated based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into consideration the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. The fair value of letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date. The amounts of fees currently charged on commitments and letters of credit are deemed insignificant, and therefore, the estimated fair values and carrying values have not been reflected in the table above.

 

46


N OTES T O C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY A ND S UBSIDIARIES

 

N OTE N INETEEN

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY (P ARENT C OMPANY O NLY ) F INANCIAL I NFORMATION

 

Condensed Balance Sheets

 

     December 31

(in thousands)


   2004

   2003

Assets

             

Cash

   $ 32,971    $ 19,137

Securities available-for-sale

     1,042      219

Investment in subsidiaries

     212,407      205,106

Deferred tax asset

     1,208      1,006

Fixed assets

     124      184

Other assets

     1,873      1,944
    

  

Total Assets

   $ 249,625    $ 227,596
    

  

Liabilities

             

Junior subordinated debentures

   $ 28,836    $ 30,836

Dividends payable

     3,649      3,329

Accrued interest payable

     641      686

Other liabilities

     418      2,055
    

  

Total Liabilities

     33,544      36,906

Shareholders’ Equity

     216,081      190,690
    

  

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

   $ 249,625    $ 227,596
    

  

 

Junior subordinated debentures represent the Parent Company’s amounts owed to City Holding Capital Trust at December 31, 2004 and 2003.

 

During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Parent Company fully repaid all of its 9.125% junior subordinated debentures held by City Holding Capital Trust II. In turn, City Holding Capital Trust II retired its $57.5 million of trust-preferred securities. In completing the redemption of the Junior Subordinated Debentures, the Parent Company recorded a $2.3 million charge against earnings to charge off the unamortized balance of issuance costs that were capitalized when the junior subordinated debentures were originally issued in 1998. The charge against 2003 earnings is reported as “loss on early extinguishment of debt” below.

 

Condensed Statements of Income

 

     Year Ended December 31

 

(in thousands)


   2004

    2003

    2002

 

Income

                        

Dividends from bank subsidiaries

   $ 38,350     $ 87,500     $ 32,000  

Other income

     132       368       846  
    


 


 


       38,482       87,868       32,846  

Expenses

                        

Interest expense

     2,627       7,540       9,283  

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     263       2,246       —    

Other expenses

     388       359       637  
    


 


 


       3,278       10,145       9,920  
    


 


 


Income Before Income Tax Benefit and Equity in Undistributed Net Income (Excess Dividends) of Subsidiaries

     35,204       77,723       22,926  

Income tax benefit

     (1,395 )     (4,057 )     (3,668 )
    


 


 


Income Before Equity in Undistributed Net Income (Excess Dividends) of Subsidiaries

     36,599       81,780       26,594  

Equity in undistributed net income (excess dividends) of subsidiaries

     9,745       (38,086 )     5,865  
    


 


 


Net Income

   $ 46,344     $ 43,694     $ 32,459  
    


 


 


 

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

 

     Year Ended December 31

 

(in thousands)


   2004

    2003

    2002

 

Operating Activities

                        

Net income

   $ 46,344     $ 43,694     $ 32,459  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

                        

Loss on early extinguishment of debentures

     263       2,246       —    

Realized investment securities gains

     (116 )     (278 )     (737 )

Provision for depreciation

     60       76       93  

(Increase) decrease in other assets

     (146 )     (726 )     1,222  

Decrease in other liabilities

     (1,682 )     (5,431 )     (1,692 )

(Equity in undistributed net income) excess dividends of subsidiaries

     (9,745 )     38,086       (5,865 )
    


 


 


Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

     34,978       77,667       25,480  

Investing Activities

                        

Purchases of available for sale securities

     (1,042 )     —         —    

Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities

     217       —         174  

Purchases of fixed assets

     —         —         (23 )
    


 


 


Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities

     (825 )     —         151  

Financing Activities

                        

Repayment of long-term debt

     (2,200 )     —         —    

Redemption of junior subordinated debentures

     —         (59,278 )     —    

Cash dividends paid

     (14,309 )     (12,480 )     (5,037 )

Purchases of treasury stock

     (5,858 )     (3,258 )     (7,473 )

Exercise of stock options

     2,048       1,216       1,104  
    


 


 


Net Cash Used in Financing Activities

     (20,319 )     (73,800 )     (11,406 )
    


 


 


Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

     13,834       3,867       14,225  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

     19,137       15,270       1,045  
    


 


 


Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year

   $ 32,971     $ 19,137     $ 15,270  
    


 


 


 

47


N OTES T O C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( CONTINUED )

C ITY H OLDING C OMPANY A ND S UBSIDIARIES

 

N OTE T WENTY

S UMMARIZED Q UARTERLY F INANCIAL I NFORMATION (U NAUDITED )

 

A summary of selected quarterly financial information for 2004 and 2003 follows:

 

(in thousands, except per share data)


   First
Quarter


   Second
Quarter


    Third
Quarter


    Fourth
Quarter


 

2004

                               

Interest income

   $ 30,175    $ 29,293     $ 29,667     $ 29,746  

Taxable equivalent adjustment

     257      246       236       236  
    

  


 


 


Interest income (FTE)

     30,432      29,539       29,903       29,982  

Interest expense

     7,863      7,860       8,035       8,113  
    

  


 


 


Net interest income

     22,569      21,679       21,868       21,869  

Provision for loan losses

     —        —         —         —    

Investment securities gains (losses)

     1,012      124       4       33  

Noninterest income

     9,908      16,265       10,852       11,838  

Noninterest expense

     16,433      16,985       15,783       17,132  
    

  


 


 


Income before income tax expense

     17,056      21,083       16,941       16,608  

Income tax expense

     5,796      7,539       5,749       5,285  

Taxable equivalent adjustment

     257      246       236       236  
    

  


 


 


Net income

   $ 11,003    $ 13,298     $ 10,956     $ 11,087  
    

  


 


 


Basic earnings per common share

   $ 0.66    $ 0.80     $ 0.66     $ 0.67  

Diluted earnings per common share

     0.65      0.79       0.65       0.66  

Average common shares outstanding:

                               

Basic

     16,681      16,694       16,584       16,572  

Diluted

     16,972      16,935       16,812       16,810  

2003

                               

Interest income

   $ 29,699    $ 29,669     $ 28,341     $ 29,581  

Taxable equivalent adjustment

     308      300       271       257  
    

  


 


 


Interest income (FTE)

     30,007      29,969       28,612       29,838  

Interest expense

     8,485      7,991       7,812       7,497  
    

  


 


 


Net interest income

     21,522      21,978       20,800       22,341  

(Recovery of) provision for loan losses

     —        (3,300 )     (1,900 )     (1,000 )

Investment securities gains (losses)

     353      22       (810 )     287  

Noninterest income

     8,421      9,396       11,155       9,914  

Noninterest expense

     15,796      15,724       15,111       17,867  
    

  


 


 


Income before income tax expense

     14,500      18,972       17,934       15,675  

Income tax expense

     4,840      6,535       6,130       4,746  

Taxable equivalent adjustment

     308      300       271       257  
    

  


 


 


Net income

   $ 9,352    $ 12,137     $ 11,533     $ 10,672  
    

  


 


 


Basic earnings per common share

   $ 0.56    $ 0.73     $ 0.69     $ 0.64  

Diluted earnings per common share

     0.55      0.72       0.68       0.63  

Average common shares outstanding:

                               

Basic

     16,638      16,622       16,636       16,641  

Diluted

     16,950      16,918       16,953       16,961  

 

N OTE T WENTY -O NE

 

E ARNINGS P ER S HARE

 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

 

(in thousands, except per share data)


   2004

   2003

   2002

Net income

   $ 46,344    $ 43,694    $ 32,459
    

  

  

Average shares outstanding

     16,632      16,634      16,809

Effect of dilutive securities:

                    

Employee stock options

     250      313      263
    

  

  

Shares for diluted earnings per share

     16,882      16,947      17,072
    

  

  

Basic earnings per share

   $ 2.79    $ 2.63    $ 1.93
    

  

  

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 2.75    $ 2.58    $ 1.90
    

  

  

 

Options to purchase 65,359 shares of common stock at exercise prices between $34.78 and $42.75 per share were outstanding during 2002 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares and therefore, the effect would be antidilutive.

 

48

Exhibit 21

 

Subsidiaries of City Holding Company

 

As of December 31, 2004, the subsidiaries, each wholly-owned, of City Holding Company included:

 

City National Bank of West Virginia

3601 MacCorkle Avenue S.E.

Charleston, West Virginia

 

National Banking Association

 

Insured Depository Institution

City Financial Corporation

3601 MacCorkle Avenue S.E.

Charleston, West Virginia

 

West Virginia Corporation

 

Inactive Securities Brokerage and Investment Advisory Company

City Mortgage Corporation

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

 

Pennsylvania Corporation

 

Inactive Mortgage Banking Company

City Holding Capital Trust

25 Gatewater Road

Charleston, West Virginia

 

Delaware Business Trust

 

Special-purpose Statutory Trust

City Holding Capital Trust II

25 Gatewater Road

Charleston, West Virginia

 

Delaware Business Trust

 

Inactive Special-purpose Statutory Trust

 

Exhibit 23

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of City Holding Company of our reports dated February 23, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of City Holding Company, City Holding Company management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of City Holding Company, included in the 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Forms S-8, Nos. 333-115282 and 333-87667) pertaining to the 2003 Incentive Plan and the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, respectively, of City Holding Company of our reports dated February 23, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of City Holding Company, City Holding Company management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of City Holding Company, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Charleston, West Virginia

February 23, 2005

 

Exhibit 31(a)

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Charles R. Hageboeck certify that:

 

  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of City Holding Company;

 

  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

  5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: February 23, 2005

 

/s/ Charles R. Hageboeck

Charles R. Hageboeck

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Exhibit 31(b)

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, David L. Bumgarner certify that:

 

  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of City Holding Company;

 

  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

  5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: February 23, 2005

 

/s/ David L. Bumgarner

David L. Bumgarner

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

Exhibit 32(a)

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of City Holding Company (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles R. Hageboeck, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: February 23, 2005

 

/s/ Charles R. Hageboeck

Charles R. Hageboeck

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Exhibit 32(b)

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of City Holding Company (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David L. Bumgarner, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: February 23, 2005

 

/s/ David L. Bumgarner

David L. Bumgarner

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer