Properties

Portfolio Summary

Our portfolio of investments at December 31, 2004 includes direct investments in health care related properties, mortgage loans, and investments through joint ventures. Our properties include hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, assisted living facilities and CCRCs, medical office buildings and other health care facilities. As of December 31, 2004, our property interests consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

5

Table of Contents

Health Care Sectors and Property Types

We have investments in hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, assisted living and CCRCs, medical office buildings and other health care facilities. The following describes the nature of the operations of our tenants and borrowers.

Hospitals . We have interests in 29 medical and surgical general and long-term acute care and rehabilitation hospitals. General hospitals offer a wide range of services such as fully-equipped operating and recovery rooms, obstetrics, radiology, intensive care, open heart surgery and coronary care, neurosurgery, neonatal intensive care, magnetic resonance imaging, nursing units, oncology, clinical laboratories, respiratory therapy, physical therapy, nuclear medicine, rehabilitation services and outpatient services. Long-term acute care hospitals provide care for patients with complex medical conditions that require longer stays and more intensive care, monitoring, or emergency back-up than that available in most skilled nursing-based sub-acute programs. Services are paid for by private sources, third party payors (e.g., insurance and HMOs), or through the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

Rehabilitation hospitals provide inpatient and outpatient care for patients who have sustained traumatic injuries or illnesses, such as spinal cord injuries, strokes, head injuries, orthopedic problems, work related disabilities and neurological diseases, as well as treatment for amputees and patients with severe arthritis. Rehabilitation programs encompass physical, occupational, speech and inhalation therapies, rehabilitative nursing and other specialties. Services are paid for by the patient or the patient’s family, third party payors (e.g., insurance and HMOs), Medicaid or Medicare.

Skilled Nursing Facilities . We have invested in 171 skilled nursing facilities. Various health care providers operate these facilities. Skilled nursing facilities offer restorative, rehabilitative and custodial nursing care for people not requiring the more extensive and sophisticated treatment available at hospitals. Ancillary revenues and revenue from sub-acute care services are derived from providing services to residents beyond room and board and include occupational, physical, speech, respiratory and intravenous therapy, wound care, oncology treatment, brain injury care and orthopedic therapy as well as sales of pharmaceutical products and other services. Certain skilled nursing facilities provide some of the foregoing services on an out-patient basis. Skilled nursing facilities are designed to supplement hospital care and depend to some degree upon referrals from practicing physicians and hospitals. Skilled nursing services are paid for either by private sources, or through the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

Skilled nursing facilities generally provide patients with accommodation, complete medical and nursing care, and rehabilitation services including speech, physical and occupational therapy. As a part of the

6

Table of Contents

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) of 1981, Congress established a waiver program under Medicaid to offer an alternative to institutional skilled nursing services. The provisions of OBRA and the subsequent OBRA Acts of 1987 and 1990 allow states, with federal approval, greater flexibility in program design as a means of developing cost-effective alternatives to delivering services traditionally provided in the skilled nursing setting. This was a contributing factor to the past increase in the number of assisted living facilities, which adversely affected some skilled nursing facilities, as some individuals chose the residential environment and lower cost delivery system provided in the assisted living setting.

Assisted Living Facilities and CCRCs . We have investments in 110 assisted living facilities which are leased to operators, who offer studio, one and two bedroom apartments on a month-to-month basis primarily to individuals who are over 75 years of age with various levels of assistance requirements. More ambulatory residents are provided meals and eat in a central dining area; they may also be assisted with some daily living activities with programs and services that allow residents certain conveniences and make it possible for them to live independently. Staff is also available when residents need assistance and for group activities. Services provided to residents who require more assistance with daily living activities, but who do not require the constant supervision other skilled nursing facilities provide, include personal supervision and assistance with eating, bathing, grooming and administering medication. Charges for room and board are generally paid from private sources.

We have investments in nine CCRCs, which are large, residential communities in a congregate care and continuing care living setting combined with onsite amenities and services. Residents are provided various services which eliminate the need to seek other living accommodations or arrangement for alternative levels of care. Ancillary and health care services are available at these properties that provide nursing and assisted living care. The full continuum of senior living environment includes independent living apartments and cottages, assisted living and, in some communities, skilled nursing and Alzheimer’s care. Various accommodation terms are available to residents, including monthly rentals, rental life care, fully refundable entrance fees, non-refundable endowments, cooperatives, and condominiums.

Medical Office Buildings . We have interests in 184 medical office buildings, including 94 MOBs owned by HCP MOP. We have a 33% ownership interest in HCP MOP. Many of these buildings are located adjacent to, or on the campus of, acute care hospitals. Medical office buildings contain physicians’ offices and examination rooms, and may also include pharmacies, hospital ancillary service space and day-surgery operating rooms. MOBs require more extensive plumbing, electrical, heating and cooling capabilities than commercial office buildings for sinks, brighter lights, special equipment and biological waste mechanisms required for the proper operation of a medical office. Most of our owned MOBs are managed by third party property management companies and 22 are leased on a single-tenant triple net basis while 68 are leased under gross or modified gross leases to multiple tenants under which we are responsible for certain operating expenses.

Other Health Care Facilities . We have investments in nine health care laboratory and biotech research facilities. These facilities are typically located on research campuses of major universities. The facilities are designed to accommodate research and development in the biopharmaceutical industry, drug discovery and development, and predictive and personalized medicine.

We also have investments in nine physician group practice clinic facilities and six health and wellness centers that are leased to five different tenants and, a single tenant, respectively, under triple net or modified gross leases. The physician group practice clinics generally provide a broad range of medical services through organized physician groups representing various medical specialties. Health and wellness centers provide testing and preventative health maintenance services.

7

Table of Contents

Investment Products

Leases

As of December 31, 2004, of our 401 owned properties, 324 are single-tenant properties under triple net leases with 80 health care providers. We leased 77 properties pursuant to gross or modified gross leases with multiple tenants. Under a triple net lease, in addition to the rent obligation, the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses of the property such as utilities, property taxes, insurance and repairs and maintenance. Under gross or modified gross leases, we are responsible for a share of property operating costs. Certain leases provide for additional rents that are based upon a percentage of the facility’s revenue in excess of the revenue for specific base periods or other thresholds. Others have rent increases based on inflation indices, fixed escalators, or other factors.

The first year annual base rental rates on properties we acquired during 2004 ranged from 9% to 11% of the purchase price of the property. Rental rates vary by lease, taking into consideration many factors, such as:

Our hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and assisted living facilities and CCRC’s are typically leased to operators on a triple-net basis with initial terms that range from five to fifteen years, and generally have one or more renewal options. The weighted average remaining initial term on these triple-net leases as of December 31, 2004, is approximately seven years. Our medical office buildings are leased on a gross, modified gross, and triple-net basis, and typically have an initial term ranging from one to fourteen years, with a weighted average remaining term of five years as of December 31, 2004.

The following table reflects the annual impact, by year, in terms of 2004 revenue for single tenant properties resulting from lease expirations (in thousands):

Development

We provide development services and construction financing on projects that are typically pre-leased. Upon completion, the assets are placed in service and included in our portfolio of directly owned properties or held by joint ventures. We use our in-house construction management expertise to evaluate local market conditions, construction costs and other factors to seek appropriate risk adjusted returns. During 2004, we completed and placed into service approximately $70 million of medical office buildings. As of December 31, 2004, we have an interest in two properties under development, one of which is held by HCP MOP.

Mortgage Loans

We have investments in mortgage loans secured by properties that are owned and operated by 10 health care providers. At December 31, 2004, the carrying amount of these mortgage loans totaled $140.7 million. Initial interest rates on mortgage loans outstanding at December 31, 2004 range from 9% to 13% per annum.

8

Table of Contents

All of our properties associated with the aforementioned tenants are under triple net leases. These companies are subject to the informational filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are required to file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Financial and other information relating to these operators may be obtained from their public reports.

According to public disclosures by Tenet and HealthSouth, each is experiencing significant legal, financial, and regulatory difficulties. We cannot predict with certainty the impact, if any, of the outcome of these uncertainties on their financial statements. The failure or inability of these operators to pay their obligations could materially reduce our revenues, net income and cash flows, which could in turn reduce the amount of cash available for the payment of dividends, cause our stock price to decline and cause us to incur impairment charges or a loss on the sale of the properties.

One of our hospitals located in Tarzana, California is operated by Tenet and is affected by State of California Senate Bill 1953, which requires certain seismic safety building standards for acute care hospital facilities. See “Government Regulation — California Senate Bill 1953” for more information.

Joint Ventures

Consolidated Joint Ventures

At December 31, 2004, we held ownership interests in 21 limited liability companies and partnerships that together own 82 properties and one mortgage, as follows:

9

Table of Contents

Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

Taxation of HCP

We believe that we have operated in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under Sections 856 to 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1985, and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner. No assurance can be given that we have operated or will be able to continue to operate in a manner so as to qualify or to remain so qualified. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the applicable Code provisions, rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof.

If we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we will generally not be required to pay federal corporate income taxes on the portion of our net income that is currently distributed to stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” (i.e., at the corporate and stockholder levels) that generally results from investment in a corporation. However, we will be required to pay federal income tax under certain circumstances.

The Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association (i) which is managed by one or more trustees or directors; (ii) the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable shares, or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest; (iii) which would be taxable, but for Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, as a domestic corporation; (iv) which is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company subject to certain provisions of the Code; (v) the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons; (vi) during the last half of each taxable year not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock of which is owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer individuals; and (vii) which meets certain other tests, described below, regarding the amount of its distributions and the nature of its income and assets. The Code provides that conditions (i) to (iv), inclusive, must be met during the entire taxable year and that condition (v) must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months.

There presently are two gross income requirements. First, at least 75% of our gross income (excluding gross income from “prohibited transactions” as defined below) for each taxable year must be derived directly or indirectly from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property or from certain types of temporary investment income. Second, at least 95% of our gross income (excluding gross income from prohibited transactions) for each taxable year must be derived from income that qualifies under the 75% test and all other dividends, interest and gain from the sale or other disposition of stock or securities. A

10

Table of Contents

“prohibited transaction” is a sale or other disposition of property (other than foreclosure property) held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.

At the close of each quarter of our taxable year, we must also satisfy four tests relating to the nature of our assets. First, at least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented by real estate assets, certain stock or debt instruments purchased with the proceeds of a stock offering or long term public debt offering by us (but only for the one year period after such offering), cash, cash items and government securities. Second, not more than 25% of our total assets may be represented by securities other than those in the 75% asset class. Third, of the investments included in the 25% asset class, the value of any one issuer’s securities owned by us may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets and we may not own more than 10% of the vote or value of the securities of a non-REIT corporation, other than certain debt securities and interests in taxable REIT subsidiaries, as defined below. Fourth, not more than 20% of the value of our total assets may be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries.

We own interests in various partnerships and limited liability companies. In the case of a REIT that is a partner in a partnership or a member of a limited liability company that is treated as a partnership under the Code, Treasury Regulations provide that for purposes of the REIT income and asset tests, the REIT will be deemed to own its proportionate share of the assets of the partnership or limited liability company and will be deemed to be entitled to the income of the partnership or limited liability company attributable to such share. The ownership of an interest in a partnership or limited liability company by a REIT may involve special tax risks, including the challenge by the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) of the allocations of income and expense items of the partnership or limited liability company, which would affect the computation of taxable income of the REIT, and the status of the partnership or limited liability company as a partnership (as opposed to an association taxable as a corporation) for federal income tax purposes.

We also own interests in a number of subsidiaries which are intended to be treated as qualified REIT subsidiaries (each a “QRS”). The Code provides that such subsidiaries will be ignored for federal income tax purposes and all assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of such subsidiaries will be treated as our assets, liabilities and items. If any partnership, limited liability company, or subsidiary in which we own an interest were treated as a regular corporation (and not as a partnership, QRS or taxable REIT subsidiary, as the case may be) for federal income tax purposes, we would likely fail to satisfy the REIT asset tests described above and would therefore fail to qualify as a REIT, unless certain relief provisions apply. We believe that each of the partnerships, limited liability companies, and subsidiaries (other than taxable REIT subsidiaries) in which we own an interest will be treated for tax purposes as a partnership, or disregarded entity (in the case of a 100% owned partnership or limited liability company) or QRS, as applicable, although no assurance can be given that the Service will not successfully challenge the status of any such organization.

As of December 31, 2004, we owned interests in two subsidiaries which are intended to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (each a “TRS”). A REIT may own any percentage of the voting stock and value of the securities of a corporation which jointly elects with the REIT to be a TRS, provided certain requirements are met. A TRS generally may engage in any business, including the provision of customary or noncustomary services to tenants of its parent REIT and of others, except a TRS may not manage or operate a hotel or health care facility. A TRS is treated as a regular corporation and is subject to federal income tax and applicable state income and franchise taxes at regular corporate rates. In addition, a 100% tax may be imposed on a REIT if its rental, service or other agreements with its TRS, or the TRS’s agreements with the REIT’s tenants, are not on arm’s-length terms.

In order to qualify as a REIT, we are required to distribute dividends (other than capital gain dividends) to our stockholders in an amount at least equal to (A) the sum of (i) 90% of our “real estate investment trust taxable income” (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain) and (ii) 90% of the net income, if any (after tax), from foreclosure property, minus (B) the sum of certain items of

11

Table of Contents

non-cash income. Such distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if declared before we timely file our tax return for such year, if paid on or before the first regular dividend payment date after such declaration and if we so elect and specify the dollar amount in our tax return. To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net long-term capital gain or distribute at least 90%, but less than 100%, of our “real estate investment trust taxable income”, as adjusted, we will be required to pay tax thereon at regular corporate tax rates. Furthermore, if we should fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (i) 85% of our ordinary income for such year, (ii) 95% of our capital gain income for such year, and (iii) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, we would be required to pay a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distributions over the amounts actually distributed.

If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year, and certain relief provisions do not apply, we will be required to pay tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Distributions to stockholders in any year in which we fail to qualify will not be deductible by us nor will they be required to be made. Unless entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, we will also be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost. It is not possible to state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to the statutory relief. Failure to qualify for even one year could substantially reduce distributions to stockholders and could result in our incurring substantial indebtedness (to the extent borrowings are feasible) or liquidating substantial investments in order to pay the resulting taxes.

We and our stockholders may be required to pay state or local tax in various state or local jurisdictions, including those in which we or they transact business or reside. The state and local tax treatment of us and our stockholders may not conform to the federal income tax consequences discussed above.

Government Regulation

The health care industry is heavily regulated by federal, state and local laws. This government regulation of the health care industry affects us because:

These laws and regulations are subject to frequent and substantial changes resulting from legislation, adoption of rules and regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations of existing law. These changes may have a dramatic effect on the definition of permissible or impermissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business and the amount of reimbursement by both government and other third-party payors. These changes may be applied retroactively. The ultimate timing or effect of these changes cannot be predicted. The failure of any tenant or borrower to comply with such laws, regulations and requirements could affect its ability to operate its facility or facilities and could adversely affect such tenant’s or borrower’s ability to make debt or lease payments to us.

Fraud and Abuse Laws . There are various federal and state laws prohibiting fraud and abusive business practices by health care providers who participate in, receive payments from or are in a position to make referrals in connection with a government-sponsored health care program, including, but not limited to the Medicare and Medicaid programs. These include:

12

Table of Contents

Each of these laws include criminal and/or civil penalties for violations that range from punitive sanctions, damage assessments, penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments, and/or exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Imposition of any of these types of penalties on our tenants or borrowers could result in a material adverse effect on their operations, which could adversely affect our business. Additionally, certain laws, such as the False Claims Act, allow for individuals to bring qui tam (or whistleblower) actions on behalf of the government for violations of fraud and abuse laws. Some Medicare fiscal intermediaries (private companies that contract with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) to administer the Medicare program) have also increased scrutiny of cost reports filed by skilled nursing providers.

Environmental Matters . A wide variety of federal, state and local environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations affect health care facility operations. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner of real property or a secured lender (such as us) may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances at, under or disposed of in connection with such property, as well as other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property). The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal or property damages and the owner’s or secured lender’s liability therefore could exceed the value of the property, and/or the assets of the owner or secured lender. In addition, the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral which, in turn, would reduce our revenue. Although the mortgage loans that we provide and leases covering our properties require the borrower and the tenant to indemnify us for certain environmental liabilities, the scope of such obligations may be limited and we cannot assure that any such borrower or tenant would be able to fulfill its indemnification obligations.

The Medicare and Medicaid Programs . Sources of revenue for tenants and mortgagors may include the federal Medicare program, state Medicaid programs, private insurance carriers, health care service plans and health maintenance organizations, among others. Efforts to reduce costs by these payors will likely continue, which may result in reduced or slower growth in reimbursement for certain services provided by some of our operators. For example, President Bush’s fiscal year 2006 budget includes a proposed reduction in Medicare spending of approximately $1.5 billion, including specific reductions in reimbursement to skilled nursing facilities. It is uncertain to what extent President Bush’s budgetary proposals will be enacted into law. In addition, the failure of any of our operators to comply with various laws and regulations could jeopardize their certification and ability to continue to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

State Medicaid Programs. Medicaid programs differ from state to state but they are all subject to federally-imposed requirements. At least 50% of the funds available under these programs are provided by the federal government under a matching program. Medicaid programs generally pay for acute and rehabilitative care based on reasonable costs at fixed rates; skilled nursing facilities are generally reimbursed using fixed daily rates. Medicaid payments are generally below retail rates for tenant-operated facilities. Increasingly, states have introduced managed care contracting techniques in the administration of Medicaid programs. Such mechanisms could have the impact of reducing utilization of and reimbursement to facilities.

13

Table of Contents

Other third party payors in various states and areas base payments on costs, retail rates or, increasingly, negotiated rates. Negotiated rates can include discounts from normal charges, fixed daily rates and prepaid capitated rates.

Entrance Fee Communities . Certain of the facilities mortgaged to or owned by us are operated as entrance fee communities. Generally, an entrance fee is an upfront fee or consideration paid by a resident, a portion of which may be refundable, in exchange for some form of long-term benefit. Some of the entrance fee communities are subject to significant state regulatory oversight, including, for example, oversight of each facility’s financial condition, establishment and monitoring of reserve requirements and other financial restrictions, the right of residents to cancel their contracts within a specified period of time, lien rights in favor of the residents, restrictions on change of ownership and similar matters. Such oversight and the rights of residents within these entrance fee communities may have an effect on the revenue or operations of the operators of such facilities and therefore may adversely impact us.

Health Care Facilities. The health care facilities in our portfolio, including hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, assisted living facilities, and physician group practice clinics, are subject to extensive federal, state and local licensure, certification and inspection laws and regulations. Failure to comply with any of these laws could result in loss of accreditation, denial of reimbursement, imposition of fines, suspension or decertification from federal and state health care programs, loss of license or closure of the facility. Such actions may have an effect on the revenue of the operators of properties owned by or mortgaged to us and therefore adversely impact us.

California Senate Bill 1953. Our hospital located in Tarzana, California is affected by State of California Senate Bill 1953 (SB 1953), which requires certain seismic safety building standards for acute care hospital facilities. This hospital is operated by Tenet under a lease expiring in February 2009. We and Tenet are currently reviewing the SB 1953 compliance of this hospital, multiple plans of action to cause such compliance, the estimated time for completing the same, and the cost of performing necessary remediation of the property. We cannot currently estimate the remediation costs that will need to be incurred prior to 2013 in order to make the facility SB 1953-compliant through 2030, and the final allocation of any remediation costs between us and Tenet. Rent on the hospital in 2004 and 2003 was $10.6 million and $10.8 million, respectively, and our carrying amount is $78.4 million at December 31, 2004.

Nurse Staffing Ratios . On January 1, 2004, a California law became effective mandating specific minimum nurse staffing ratios for acute care hospitals. As a result of this requirement, hospital labor costs will be materially increased. Facilities may also be forced to limit patient admissions due to an inability to hire the necessary number of nurses to meet the required ratio, which affects net operating revenue. It is unclear the extent to which compliance with these nurse staffing ratios in California may adversely affect hospital operators in California.

Current Developments

The health care industry continues to face various challenges, including increased government and private payor pressure on health care providers to control costs, the migration of patients from acute care facilities into extended care and home care settings, and the vertical and horizontal consolidation of health care providers.

Changes in the law, new interpretations of existing laws, and changes in payment methodologies may have a dramatic effect on the definition of permissible or impermissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business and the amount of reimbursement furnished by both government and other third-party payors. These changes may be applied retroactively under certain circumstances. The ultimate timing or effect of legislative efforts cannot be predicted and may impact us in different ways.

In December of 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”) was signed into law. The Act established an 18-month moratorium on the “whole hospital

14

Table of Contents

exception” to the Stark law, whereby physicians have been permitted to refer patients for Designated Health Services to hospitals in which they have an ownership interest. The moratorium removes specialty hospitals from the “whole hospital exception” from December 8, 2003 through June 7, 2005. Specialty hospitals include hospitals primarily or exclusively engaged in the care and treatment of cardiac conditions or orthopedic conditions, or hospitals that perform certain surgical procedures. Specialty hospitals in operation or under development as of November 18, 2003 are grandfathered under the moratorium. The Act requires that MedPAC, an independent federal body established to advise Congress on issues affecting the Medicare program, and HHS conduct studies on the costs of service, utilization, quality of care and financial impact of specialty hospitals and their physician owners relative to community hospitals, particularly nonprofits. On January 14, 2005 MedPAC announced that it would recommend that Congress extend the Stark specialty hospital moratorium for an additional 18 months to address concerns about the effects of physician investments in specialty hospitals. MedPAC’s recommendations were based upon its findings that when compared with community hospitals, physician owned specialty hospitals tend to concentrate on certain more profitable Diagnostic Related Groups (“DRGs”) and on patients with relatively low severity within those DRGs, and tend to treat lower percentages of Medicare patients. Congress is not obligated to follow MedPAC’s recommendations. Congress may take legislative action implementing MedPAC’s recommendations or wait for the HHS report on specialty hospital quality, which could lead to further restrictions on hospital ownership by physicians.

In addition to the reforms enacted and considered by Congress from time to time, state legislatures periodically consider various health care reform proposals. Congress and state legislatures can be expected to continue to review and assess alternative health care delivery systems, new regulatory enforcement initiatives, and new payment methodologies.

We believe that government and private efforts to contain or reduce health care costs will continue. These trends are likely to lead to reduced or slower growth in reimbursement for certain services provided by some of our tenants and mortgagors. We believe the vast nature of the health care industry, the financial strength and operating flexibility of our operators, and the diversity of our portfolio will mitigate the impact of any such diminution in reimbursements. However, we cannot predict what legislation will be adopted, and no assurance can be given the health care reforms will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Employees

At December 31, 2004, the Company had 74 full-time employees and one part-time employee, none of whom are subject to a collective bargaining agreement.

15

Table of Contents

Legal Entities

We conduct our business through various legal entities, including the following at December 31, 2004:

16

Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risks described below as well as the risks described in “Competition”, “Government Regulation”, and “Taxation of HCP” and elsewhere in this report, which risks are incorporated by reference into this section, before making an investment decision in our company. The risks and uncertainties described herein are not the only ones facing us and there may be additional risks that we do not presently know of or that we currently consider not likely to have a significant impact. All of these risks could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Risks Related to Our Operators

If our tenants and mortgagors are unable to operate our properties in a manner sufficient to generate income, they may be unable to make rent and loan payments to us.

The health care industry is highly competitive and we expect that it may become more competitive in the future. Our tenants and mortgagors are subject to competition from other health care providers that provide similar health care services, including from newly constructed facilities. The profitability of health care facilities depends upon several factors, including the number of physicians using the health care facilities or referring patients there, competitive systems of health care delivery and the size and composition of the population in the surrounding area. Private, federal and state payment programs, including a reduction in reimbursement by any of them, and the effect of other laws and regulations may also have a significant influence on the revenues and income of the properties. If our tenants and mortgagors are not competitive with other health care providers and are unable to generate income, they may be unable to make rent and loan payments to us.

The bankruptcy, insolvency or financial deterioration of our facility operators could significantly delay our ability to collect unpaid rents or require us to find new operators.

Our financial position and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders may be adversely affected by financial difficulties experienced by any of our major operators, including bankruptcy, insolvency or a general downturn in the business, or in the event any of our major operators do not renew or extend their relationship with us as their lease terms expire.

We are exposed to the risk that our operators may not be able to meet their obligations, which may result in their bankruptcy or insolvency. Although our leases and loans provide us the right to terminate an investment, evict an operator, demand immediate repayment and other remedies, the bankruptcy laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization. An operator in bankruptcy may be able to restrict our ability to collect unpaid rents or interest during the bankruptcy proceeding.

Tenet Healthcare Corporation accounts for a significant percentage of our revenues and is currently experiencing significant legal, financial and regulatory difficulties.

During 2004, Tenet Healthcare Corporation accounted for approximately 12% of our revenues. According to public disclosures, Tenet is experiencing significant legal, financial and regulatory difficulties. We cannot predict with certainty the impact, if any, of the outcome of these uncertainties on our consolidated financial statements. The failure or inability of Tenet to pay its obligations could materially reduce our revenue, net income and cash flows and could have a material adverse effect on the value of our common stock.

17

Table of Contents

Our operators are faced with increased litigation and rising insurance costs that may affect their ability to pay their lease or mortgage payments.

In some states, advocacy groups have been created to monitor the quality of care at health care facilities, and these groups have brought litigation against operators. Also, in several instances, private litigation by patients has succeeded in winning very large damage awards for alleged abuses. The effect of this litigation and potential litigation has been to materially increase the costs of monitoring and reporting quality of care compliance incurred by our tenants. In addition, the cost of liability and medical malpractice insurance has increased and may continue to increase so long as the present litigation environment affecting the operations of health care facilities continues. Continued cost increases could cause our tenants to be unable to pay their lease or mortgage payments, potentially decreasing our revenue and increasing our collection and litigation costs. Moreover, to the extent we are required to take back the affected facilities, our revenue from those facilities could be reduced or eliminated for an extended period of time.

Risks Related to Real Estate Investment and Our Structure

We rely on external sources of capital to fund future capital needs, and if our access to such capital is difficult or on commercially unreasonable terms, we may not be able to meet maturing commitments or make future investments necessary to grow our business.

In order to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, among other things, we are required to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income each year, and we will be subject to tax to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders each year. Because of these distribution requirements, we may not be able to fund all future capital needs, including capital needs in connection with acquisitions, from cash retained from operations. As a result, we rely on external sources of capital. If we are unable to obtain needed capital at all or only on unfavorable terms from these sources, we might not be able to make the investments needed to grow our business, or to meet our obligations and commitments as they mature, which could negatively affect the ratings of our debt and even, in extreme circumstances, affect our ability to continue operations. Our access to capital depends upon a number of factors over which we have little or no control, including general market conditions, interest rates, the market’s perception of our growth potential, our current and potential future earnings, and our cash distributions and the market price of the shares of our capital stock.

If we are unable to purchase suitable health care facilities at a favorable cost, we will be unable to continue to grow through acquisitions.

The acquisition and financing of health care facilities at favorable costs is highly competitive. If we cannot identify and purchase a sufficient quantity of health care facilities at favorable prices, or if we are unable to finance such acquisitions on commercially favorable terms, our business will suffer.

Unforeseen costs associated with the acquisition of new properties could reduce our profitability.

Our business strategy contemplates future acquisitions. The acquisitions we make may not prove to be successful. We might encounter unanticipated difficulties and expenditures relating to any acquired properties, including contingent liabilities. We might never realize the anticipated benefits of an acquisition, which could adversely affect our profitability.

Since real estate investments are illiquid, we may not be able to sell properties when we desire.

Real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly. We may not be able to vary our portfolio promptly in response to vacancies or economic conditions. This inability to respond to changes in the performance of our investments could adversely affect our ability to service debt and make distributions to our stockholders. In addition, there are limitations under the federal income tax laws applicable to REITs that may limit our ability to recognize the full economic benefit from a sale of our assets.

18

Table of Contents

Transfers of health care facilities generally require regulatory approvals and alternative uses of health care facilities are limited.

Because transfers of health care facilities may be subject to regulatory approvals not required for transfers of other types of commercial operations and other types of real estate, there may be delays in transferring operations of our facilities to successor tenants or we may be prohibited from transferring operations to a successor tenant. In addition, many of our properties are health care facilities that may not be easily adapted to non-health care related uses. If we are unable to transfer properties at times opportune to us, our revenue and operations may suffer.

Some potential losses may not be covered by insurance.

We generally require our tenants and mortgagors to secure and maintain comprehensive liability and property insurance that covers us, as well as the tenants or mortgagors, on most of our properties. Some types of losses, however, either may be uninsurable or too expensive to insure against. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property. In such an event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property. We cannot assure you that material losses in excess of insurance proceeds will not occur in the future.

Loss of our tax status as a REIT would have significant adverse consequences to us.

We believe we currently operate and have operated commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1985, in a manner that allows us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes under the Internal Revenue Code, as amended.

Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to qualify as a REIT. For example, in order to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income in any year must be derived from qualifying sources, and we must satisfy a number of requirements regarding the composition of our assets. Also, we must make distributions to stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, excluding capital gains. In addition, new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may adversely affect our investors or our ability to qualify as a REIT for tax purposes. Although we believe that we have been organized and have operated in such manner, we can give no assurance that we have qualified or will continue to qualify as a REIT for tax purposes.

If we lose our REIT status, we will face serious tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available to make payments of principal and interest on the debt securities we issue and to make distributions to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT:

In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would not be required to make distributions to stockholders.

As a result of all these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT also could impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital, and could adversely affect the value of our common stock.

19

Table of Contents

We are organized to invest in income-producing health care related facilities. In evaluating potential investments, we consider such factors as:

The following summarizes our direct property investments and interests held through joint ventures and mortgage loans (square feet and dollars in thousands).

20

Table of Contents

21

Table of Contents

22

Table of Contents

The following is summarized unaudited information for HCP MOP: