RI SK FACTORS

Your purchase of shares involves a number of risks. You should carefully consider the following risk factors in conjunction with the other information contained in this prospectus before purchasing shares of our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below represent those risks and uncertainties that we believe are material to us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also harm our business. The occurrence of any of these risk factors, particularly those under the subheadings “— Company Related Risks,” “— Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest and Our Relationships with Our Advisor and Its Affiliates,” “— Risks Related to Our Business,” “— Lending Related Risks,” “— Tax Related Risks,” and “— Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure,” could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to you.

Offering Related Risks

The price of our shares was determined arbitrarily and may not bear any relationship to what a stockholder could receive if his or her shares were resold.

We determined the offering price of our shares in our sole discretion based on:

The offering price of our shares may be higher or lower than the price at which the shares would trade it they were listed on a national securities exchange or actively traded by dealers or marketmakers. Further, there is no assurance that you will be able to sell any shares that you purchase in the offering at prices that equal or exceed the offering price, if at all. You may lose money on any sale. See “Plan of Distribution” for additional discussion regarding the offering price of our shares.

There may be a delay in investing the proceeds from this offering if our advisor is not able to immediately find suitable properties, loans or other real estate-related assets and/or tenants, operators or managers for those investments. Therefore, we might experience a delay in the receipt of returns from such investments.

We may delay investing the proceeds of this offering if our advisor is not able to immediately find suitable properties, loans or other real estate-related assets and/or tenants, operators or managers for these investments. Until we invest in properties, loans or other real estate-related assets, we may invest the proceeds of this offering in short-term, investment-grade securities subject to certain terms and limitations. These securities typically yield less than investments in commercial real estate. These delays may be due to the inability of our advisor to find suitable properties, loans or other real estate-related assets. If we have not invested or committed for investment the net proceeds from this offering or reserved those funds for company purposes within the later of two years from the initial date of this prospectus, or one year after the termination of this offering, then we will distribute the remaining funds, including accrued interest (without deductions for fees and expenses) which has not been previously distributed, pro-rata to such persons who are our stockholders at that time.

There may be a delay in investing the proceeds from this offering because our advisor and affiliates of our sponsor or CNL may be simultaneously trying to find suitable investments both for us and for other real estate investment programs sponsored by CNL.

We may experience delays investing the proceeds of this offering because our advisor or its affiliates may be simultaneously trying to find suitable investments both for us and for other real estate investment programs sponsored by CNL, some of which have investment objectives and employ investment strategies similar to ours. If we have not invested or committed for investment the net proceeds from this offering or reserved those funds for company purposes within the later of two years from the initial date of this prospectus, or one year after the termination of this offering, then we will distribute the remaining funds, including accrued interest (without deductions for fees and expenses) which has not been previously distributed, pro-rata to such persons who are our stockholders at that time.

Selling your shares will be difficult, because there is no market for our common stock and there can be no assurance that one will develop.

Currently, there is no market for our shares, so stockholders may not be able to promptly sell their shares at any particular price. Although we anticipate applying for listing or quotation or pursuing an alternate exit strategy, we do not know if we will ever apply to list our shares on a national securities exchange or be included for quotation on the National Market System of the NASDAQ Stock Market or, if we do apply for listing or quotation, when such application would be made or whether it would be accepted. If our shares are listed, we still cannot assure you that a public trading market will develop. We cannot assure you that the price you would receive in a sale on a national securities exchange or on the National Market System of the NASDAQ Stock Market would be representative of the

21

Table of Contents

value of the assets we own or that the price would equal or exceed the amount you paid for our shares. In addition, although we have adopted a redemption plan, we have discretion to not redeem your shares, to amend or suspend the plan and to cease redemptions. Further, we may not have sufficient liquidity to satisfy your redemption requests. The redemption plan has many limitations and you should not rely upon it as a method of selling shares promptly and at a desired price. In the future, our board of directors may consider various exit strategies, but our articles of incorporation do not require that we consummate a transaction to provide liquidity to stockholders on any certain date or at all. As a result, you should purchase shares of our common stock only as a long-term investment.

This is a “best efforts” offering and the number and type of investments we make will depend on the proceeds raised in this offering. In the event we raise only $2 million, we will make fewer investments, resulting in a less diversified portfolio of investments in terms of number, amount and location.

This offering is being made on a “best efforts” basis, which means our managing dealer and participating brokers are only required to use their best efforts to sell shares of our common stock and have no firm commitment or obligation to purchase any of our shares. The minimum amount of shares we are required to sell is $2 million. We are not required to sell the full amount offered in this prospectus. If we raise substantially less than the maximum offering amount, we may not be able to invest in as diverse a portfolio of properties as we otherwise would. A lack of diversification would increase the likelihood that any single investment’s performance would materially affect our overall investment performance. Your investment in our shares will be subject to greater risk to the extent that we have limited diversification in our portfolio of investments. Additionally, our inability to raise substantial funds would increase our fixed operating expenses as a percentage of gross income.

You are limited in your ability to sell your shares pursuant to our share redemption plan.

Our share redemption plan provides you with the opportunity, on a quarterly basis, to request that we redeem all or a portion of your shares after you have held them for one year, subject to certain restrictions and limitations. Shares will be redeemed at the discretion of our board of directors subject to the provisions of our redemption plan and only to the extent of cash available after the payment of dividends necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT and to avoid the payment of any U.S. federal income tax or excise tax on our net taxable income. This may significantly limit our ability to redeem your shares. To the extent funds are insufficient to redeem all of the shares for which redemption requests have been submitted, your request will be reduced on a pro rata basis and retained by us to be redeemed in subsequent quarters as funds become available unless you withdraw your request. Our board of directors reserves the right to amend or suspend the share redemption plan at any time. Therefore, in making a decision to purchase shares, you should not assume that you will be able to sell any of your shares back to us pursuant to our share redemption plan.

You cannot evaluate the types of properties or the specific properties or the loans or other real estate-related assets that we may acquire prior to purchasing shares of our common stock.

This is a blind pool offering which means we have not identified all of the specific assets that we will acquire in the future and we cannot provide you with all of the information that you may want to evaluate before deciding to invest in our shares. Although we will supplement this prospectus as we make or commit to make material acquisitions of properties and other real estate-related assets, to the extent we have not yet acquired or identified assets for acquisition at the time you make your investment decision, you will not be able to evaluate the economic merits, transaction terms or other financial or operational data concerning our investments prior to purchasing shares of our common stock. Our board has absolute discretion in implementing the investment policies set forth in our articles of incorporation. See “Business — Investment Strategy” for a discussion of our investment policies and strategies. While we have targeted certain types of properties in which we intend to invest, our investment policies and strategies are very broad and permit us to invest in many types of real estate, including developed and undeveloped properties, regardless of geographic location or property type.

We cannot assure you that we will obtain suitable investments and meet our investment objectives.

We cannot be certain that we will be successful in obtaining suitable investments on financially attractive terms or that, if we make investments, our objectives will be achieved. If we are unable to find suitable investments, then our financial condition and ability to pay distributions and/or increase the distribution rate could be adversely affected.

22

Table of Contents

Company Related Risks

We have no operating history and the prior performance of real estate investment programs sponsored by CNL may not be indicative of our future results.

We are a newly organized company with no operating history. You should not rely upon the past performance of other real estate investment programs sponsored by CNL to predict our future results. You should consider our prospects in light of the risks, uncertainties and difficulties frequently encountered by companies that are, like us, in their early stage of development. To be successful, our advisor must, among other things:

There can be no assurance that our advisor will succeed in achieving these goals.

We may pay distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations or funds from operations.

We expect to generate little, if any, cash flow from operations or funds from operations until we make substantial investments. Further, to the extent we invest in development or redevelopment projects, or in properties requiring significant capital, our ability to make distributions may be negatively affected, especially during our early stages of operations. Accordingly, until such time as we are generating operating cash flow or funds from operations, we may determine not to pay cash distributions or to pay all or a portion of our distributions from sources other than net operating cash flows, such as cash flows generated from financing activities, a component of which may include the proceeds of this offering, and borrowings, whether secured by our assets or unsecured. We have not established any limit on the extent to which we may use borrowings or proceeds of this offering to pay distributions. To the extent we use sources of cash flow other than cash flow from operations or funds from operations to pay distributions, we will have less capital available to invest in properties and other real estate-related assets, the book value per share may decline, and there will be no assurance that we will be able to sustain distributions at that level. If offering proceeds are used to fund distributions, earlier investors may benefit from the investments made with funds raised later in this offering, while later investors may not benefit from all of the net offering proceeds raised from earlier investors. We currently have no plans regarding when distributions will commence. In addition, to the extent distributions exceed earnings and profits calculations on a tax basis, a stockholder’s basis in our stock will be reduced and, to the extent distributions exceed a stockholder’s basis, the stockholder may recognize a capital gain in the future.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve expected cash flows necessary to initially pay or maintain distributions at any particular level, or that distributions will increase over time.

There are many factors that can affect the availability and timing of cash distributions to stockholders. Distributions generally will be based upon such factors as the amount of cash available or anticipated to be available from real estate investments and investments in real estate-related securities, mortgage or other loans and assets, current and projected cash requirements and tax considerations. Because we may receive income from property operations and interest or rents at various times during our fiscal year, distributions paid may not reflect our income earned in that particular distribution period. The amount of cash available for distributions will be affected by many factors, such as our ability to make acquisitions as offering proceeds become available, the income from those investments and yields on securities of other real estate programs that we invest in, as well as our operating expense levels and many other variables. Actual cash available for distribution may vary substantially from estimates. We cannot assure you that:

23

Table of Contents

Our actual results may differ significantly from the assumptions used by our board of directors in establishing the distribution rates to be paid on our shares.

Many of the factors that can affect the availability and timing of cash distributions to stockholders are beyond our control, and a change in any one factor could adversely affect our ability to pay distributions. For instance:

In addition, subject to the applicable REIT rules, our board of directors, in its discretion, may retain any portion of our cash on hand or use offering proceeds for capital needs and other corporate purposes. We cannot assure you that we will generate or have sufficient cash available to pay cash distributions to you, to continue paying distributions to you at any specified level, or that distributions we make may not be decreased or be eliminated in the future.

Yields on and safety of deposits may be lower due to the significant decline in the financial markets.

Until we invest the proceeds of this offering in properties, we will generally hold those funds in permitted investments that are consistent with preservation of liquidity and safety. The investments will include money market funds, bank money market accounts and certificates of deposit or other accounts at third-party depository institutions. While we strive to hold these funds in high quality investments with quality institutions, there can be no assurance that continued or unusual declines in the financial markets will not result in a loss of some or all of these funds or reductions in cash flows from these investments.

24

Table of Contents

Because we rely on affiliates of CNL for advisory, property management and managing dealer services, if these affiliates or their executive officers and other key personnel are unable to meet their obligations to us, we may be required to find alternative providers of these services, which could disrupt our business.

CNL, through one or more of its respective affiliates or subsidiaries, owns and controls our advisor and property manager. In addition, CNL, through a subsidiary, owns and controls CNL Securities Corp., the managing dealer of this offering. In the event that any of these affiliates are unable to meet their obligations to us, we might be required to find alternative service providers, which could disrupt our business by causing delays and/or increasing our costs.

Further, our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of James M. Seneff, Jr., our chairman, Robert A. Bourne, our vice chairman, R. Byron Carlock, Jr., our chief executive officer, Charles A. Muller, our chief operating officer and Tammie A. Quinlan, our chief financial officer, each of whom would be difficult to replace. If any of these key personnel were to cease their affiliation with us or our affiliates, we may be unable to find suitable replacement personnel, and our operating results could suffer as a result. For example, all of our executive officers and the executive officers of our advisor are also executive officers of CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. and its advisor. In the event that CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. internalizes the management functions provided by its advisor, such executive officers may cease their employment with us and our advisor. In that case, our advisor would need to find and hire an entirely new executive management team. We believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon our advisor’s ability to hire and retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and our advisor may be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel. We do not maintain key person life insurance on any of our officers.

Our stockholders may experience dilution which could have a material adverse effect on the distributions you receive from us.

Our stockholders have no preemptive rights. If we commence a subsequent public offering of shares or securities convertible into shares, or otherwise issue additional shares, then investors purchasing shares in this offering who do not participate in future stock issuances will experience dilution in the percentage of their equity investment. Stockholders will not be entitled to vote on whether or not we engage in additional offerings. In addition, depending on the terms and pricing of an additional offering of our shares and the value of our properties, our stockholders may experience dilution in both the book value and fair value of their shares. Our board of directors has not yet determined whether it will engage in future offerings or other issuances of shares; however, it may do so if our board determines that it is in our best interests. Other public REITs sponsored by CNL have engaged in multiple offerings.

We may be restricted in our ability to replace our property manager under certain circumstances which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Our ability to replace our property manager may be limited. Under the terms of our property management agreement, we may terminate the agreement (a) in the event of our property manager’s voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy or a similar insolvency event or (b) for “cause.” In this case, “cause” means a material breach of the property management agreement of any nature by the property manager relating to all or substantially all of the properties being managed under the agreement that is not cured within 30 days after notice to the property manager. We may amend the property management agreement from time to time to remove a particular property from the pool of properties managed by our property manager (a) if the property is sold to a bona fide unaffiliated purchaser, or (b) for “cause.” Our board of directors may find the performance of our property manager to be unsatisfactory. However, unsatisfactory performance by the property manager may not constitute “cause.” As a result, we may be unable to terminate the property management agreement even if our board concludes that doing so is in our best interest.

Your investment return may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

We are not registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act based on exclusions that we believe are available to us. If we were obligated to register as an investment company, we would have to comply with a variety of substantive requirements under the Investment Company Act imposing, among other things:

25

Table of Contents

In order to be excluded from regulation under the Investment Company Act, we intend to engage primarily in the business of acquiring real property, making mortgage loans and other loans collateralized by interests in real estate and making other real estate-related investments. We intend to rely on exemptions or exclusions provided by the Investment Company Act for the direct ownership, or the functional equivalent thereof, of certain qualifying real estate assets or by engaging in business through one or more majority owned subsidiaries. We may rely on any other exemption or exclusion under the Investment Company Act. For one of the available exemptions, mortgage-backed securities may or may not constitute qualifying real estate assets, depending on the characteristics of the mortgage-backed securities, including the rights that we have with respect to the underlying loans. Our ownership of mortgage-backed securities, therefore, is limited by provisions of the Investment Company Act and Securities and Exchange Commission staff interpretations.

To maintain compliance with the Investment Company Act exemption, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we may have to acquire additional income-or loss-generating assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or may have to forego opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we would otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our investment strategy.

If we were required to register as an investment company but failed to do so, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business and criminal and civil actions could be brought against us. In addition, our contracts would be unenforceable unless a court required enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.

Stockholders have limited control over changes in our policies and operations.

Our board of directors determines our investment policies, including our policies regarding financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our board of directors may amend or revise these and other policies without a vote of our stockholders. Under our articles of incorporation and Maryland general corporation law, our stockholders currently have a right to vote only on the following matters:

26

Table of Contents

All other matters are subject to the discretion of our board of directors. In addition, our board of directors has the authority to amend, without stockholder approval, the terms of our advisory agreement, which could result in less favorable terms to our investors.

Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest and Our Relationships with Our Advisor and Its Affiliates

We will be subject to conflicts of interest arising out of our relationships with our advisor and its affiliates, including the material conflicts discussed below. The “Conflicts of Interest” section of this prospectus provides a more detailed discussion of the conflicts of interest between us and our advisor and its affiliates and our policies to reduce certain potential conflicts.

There may be conflicts of interest because of interlocking boards of directors with affiliated companies.

James M. Seneff, Jr. and Robert A. Bourne serve as our chairman and vice chairman, respectively, and as directors of our board and concurrently serve as directors for CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. Mr. Seneff also currently serves as chairman and a director for CNL Macquarie Global Growth Trust, Inc. and for Macquarie CNL Global Income Trust, Inc. These directors may experience conflicts of interest in managing us because they also have management responsibilities for these affiliated entities, which invest in and may invest in properties in the same markets as our properties.

There will be competing demands on our officers and directors and they may not devote all of their attention to us which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Our directors, James M. Seneff, Jr. and Robert A. Bourne are also officers and directors of our advisor and other affiliated entities and may experience conflicts of interest in managing us because they also have management responsibilities for other companies including companies that may invest in some of the same types of assets in which we may invest. In addition, substantially all of the other companies that they work for are affiliates of us and/or our advisor. Our independent directors also are independent directors of CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc., an affiliate of our sponsor. For these reasons, all of these individuals will share their management time and services among those companies and us, and will not devote all of their attention to us and could take actions that are more favorable to the other companies than to us.

In addition, R. Byron Carlock, Jr., our chief executive officer, Charles A. Muller, our chief operating officer, Tammie A. Quinlan, our chief financial officer, and our other officers serve as officers of, and devote time to, CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc., an affiliate of our advisor with similar investment objectives and which owns assets in several of the asset classes in which we intend to invest, and may serve as officers of, and devote time to, other companies which may be affiliated with us in the future. These officers may experience conflicts of interest in managing us because they also have management responsibilities for CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. For these reasons, these officers will share their management time and services among CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. and us, and will not devote all of their attention to us and could take actions that are more favorable to CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. than to us.

Other real estate investment programs sponsored by CNL use investment strategies that are similar to ours. Our advisor and its affiliates, and their and our executive officers will face conflicts of interest relating to the purchase and leasing of properties and other investments, and such conflicts may not be resolved in our favor.

One or more real estate investment programs sponsored by CNL may be seeking to invest in properties and other real estate-related investments similar to the assets we are seeking to acquire. CNL has three other public

27

Table of Contents

active real estate investment programs which have investment strategies similar to ours. All of these programs invest in commercial properties. As a result, we may be buying properties and other real estate-related investments at the same time as other programs sponsored by CNL and managed by the executive officers of our advisor or its affiliates are also buying properties and other real estate-related investments. We cannot assure you that properties we want to acquire will be allocated to us in this situation. CNL is not required to allocate each prospective investment to our advisor for review. Our advisor may choose a property that provides lower returns to us than a property allocated to another program sponsored by CNL. In addition, we may acquire properties in geographic areas where other programs sponsored by CNL own properties. If one of such other programs sponsored by CNL attracts a tenant that we are competing for, we could suffer a loss of revenue due to delays in locating another suitable tenant. You will not have the opportunity to evaluate the manner in which these conflicts of interest are resolved before or after making your investment.

We may be prevented from investing in certain property sectors if CNL enters into a covenant not to compete as part of a transaction involving the listing of the shares of CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. on a national securities exchange, the merger of CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. with or into another entity, the sale of the assets or shares of CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. to another entity or a similar type of transaction.

During the course of this offering, CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc., whose advisor is an affiliate of CNL, may enter into a transaction involving (a) the listing of its shares on a national securities exchange, (b) the sale to, or merger with, another entity in a transaction which provides the investors of CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. with cash or securities of a publicly traded company, or (c) the commencement of the orderly sale of the assets of CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. and the subsequent distribution of the proceeds thereof. In connection with the consummation of any of the foregoing transactions, or in the event of the transfer of the ownership interests of the advisor of CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc., the counterparty to the transaction may request, as a precondition to the consummation of the transaction, that CNL provide a covenant not to compete or similar agreement which would serve to limit the future acquisition of properties in certain property sectors, such as ski, golf and attraction properties by CNL and its affiliates, including our advisor, for a certain period of time. Under such circumstances, CNL, on behalf of itself and its affiliates, including our advisor, may be willing to provide such a covenant not to compete, but solely with respect to properties in certain property sectors, such as ski, golf and attraction properties, and for a limited period of time not to exceed two years from the date of the consummation of the applicable transaction. In such event, we would be limited in our ability to pursue or invest in properties in certain property sectors, such as ski, golf and attraction properties during the term of any such covenant not to compete.

Our advisor and its affiliates, including all of our executive officers and our affiliated directors, will face conflicts of interest as a result of their compensation arrangements with us, which could result in actions that are not in the best interest of our stockholders.

We may pay our advisor and its affiliates, including the managing dealer of this offering and our property manager, substantial fees. These fees could influence their advice to us, as well as the judgment of affiliates of our advisor performing services for us. Among other matters, these compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to:

28

Table of Contents

The fees our advisor receives in connection with transactions involving the purchase and management of our assets are not necessarily based on the quality of the investment or the quality of the services rendered to us. The basis upon which fees are calculated may influence our advisor to recommend riskier transactions to us.

None of the agreements with our advisor, property manager or any other affiliates were negotiated at arm’s length.

Agreements with our advisor, property manager or any other affiliates may contain terms that are not in our best interest and would not otherwise apply if we entered into agreements negotiated at arm’s length with third parties.

Because the managing dealer is an affiliate of our advisor, investors will not have the benefit of an independent review of us or this prospectus, which are customarily performed in underwritten offerings.

Our managing dealer, CNL Securities Corp., is an affiliate of CNL and will not make an independent review of us or the offering. Accordingly, unless your participating broker determines to conduct such a review, you will not have the benefit of an independent review of the terms of this offering.

If we internalize our management functions, your interest in us could be diluted, we could incur other significant costs associated with being self-managed, we may not be able to retain or replace key personnel and we may have increased exposure to litigation as a result of internalizing our management functions.

We may internalize management functions provided by our advisor, our property manager and their respective affiliates. Our board of directors may decide in the future to acquire assets and personnel from our advisor or its affiliates for consideration that would be negotiated at that time. There can be no assurances that we will be successful in retaining our advisor’s key personnel in the event of an internalization transaction. In the event we were to acquire our advisor or our property manager, we cannot be sure of the form or amount of consideration or other terms relating to any such acquisition, which could take many forms, including cash payments, promissory notes and shares of our stock. The payment of such consideration could reduce the percentage of our shares owned by persons who purchase shares in this offering and could reduce the net income per share and funds from operations per share attributable to your investment.

In addition, we may issue equity awards to officers and consultants, which awards would decrease net income and funds from operations. We cannot reasonably estimate the amount of fees to our advisor, property manager and other affiliates we would save, and the costs we would incur, if we acquired these entities. If the expenses we assume as a result of an internalization are higher than the expenses we avoid paying to our advisor, property manager and other affiliates, our net income per share and funds from operations per share would be lower than they otherwise would have been had we not acquired these entities.

Additionally, if we internalize our management functions, we could have difficulty integrating these functions. Currently, the officers of our advisor and its affiliates perform asset management and general and administrative functions, including accounting and financial reporting, for multiple entities. We may fail to properly identify the appropriate mix of personnel and capital needs to operate as a stand-alone entity. An inability to manage an internalization transaction effectively could result in our incurring additional costs and divert our management’s attention from effectively managing our properties and overseeing other real estate-related assets.

In recent years, internalization transactions have been the subject of stockholder litigation. Stockholder litigation can be costly and time-consuming, and there can be no assurance that any litigation expenses we might

29

Table of Contents

incur would not be significant or that the outcome of litigation would be favorable to us. Any amounts we are required to expend defending any such litigation will reduce the amount of funds available for investment by us in properties or other investments.

Risks Related to Our Business

We will depend on tenants for a significant portion of our revenue and lease defaults or terminations could have an adverse effect.

Our ability to repay any outstanding debt and make distributions to stockholders will depend upon the ability of our tenants to make payments to us, and their ability to make these payments will depend primarily on their ability to generate sufficient revenues in excess of operating expenses from businesses conducted on our properties. For example, a tenant’s failure or delay in making scheduled rent payments to us may result from the tenant realizing reduced revenues at the properties it operates. Defaults on lease payment obligations by our tenants would cause us to lose the revenue associated with those leases and require us to find an alternative source of revenue to pay our mortgage indebtedness and prevent a foreclosure action. In addition, if a tenant at one of our single-user facilities, which are properties designed or built primarily for a particular tenant or a specific type of use, defaults on its lease obligations, we may not be able to readily market a single-user facility to a new tenant without making capital improvements or incurring other significant costs.

The current economic slowdown could adversely affect certain of the properties in which we invest, and the financial difficulties of our tenants and operators could adversely affect us.

The current economic slowdown could adversely affect certain of the properties in which we invest. Although a general downturn in the real estate industry would be expected to adversely affect the value of our properties, a downturn in the leisure, lodging and/or senior living market sectors in which we invest could compound the adverse affect. Economic weakness combined with higher costs, especially for energy, food and commodities, has put considerable pressure on consumer spending, which, along with the lack of available debt, could result in our tenants experiencing a decline in financial and operating performance and/or a decline in earnings from our TRS investments.

The performance of the senior living industry is linked to the performance of the general economy and, specifically, the housing market in the United States. It is also sensitive to personal wealth and available fixed income of seniors and their adult children. Declines in home values, consumer confidence and net worth due to adverse general economic conditions may reduce demand for senior living properties.

The continuation of disruptions in the financial markets and deteriorating economic conditions could impact certain of the real estate we may acquire and such real estate could experience reduced occupancy levels than anticipated at the time of our acquisition of such real estate. The value of our real estate investments could decrease below the amounts we paid for the investments. Revenues from properties could decrease due to lower occupancy rates, reduced rental rates and potential increases in uncollectible rent. We will incur expenses, such as for maintenance costs, insurances costs and property taxes, even though a property is vacant. The longer the period of significant vacancies for a property, the greater the potential negative impact on our revenues and results of operations.

We do not have control over market and business conditions that may affect our success.

The following external factors, as well as other factors beyond our control, may reduce the value of properties that we acquire, the ability of tenants to pay rent on a timely basis, or at all, the amount of the rent to be paid and the ability of borrowers to make loan payments on time, or at all:

30

Table of Contents

Further, the results of operations for a property in any one period may not be indicative of results in future periods, and the long-term performance of such property generally may not be comparable to, and cash flows may not be as predictable as, other properties owned by third parties in the same or similar industry. If tenants are unable to make lease payments, TRS entities do not perform, or borrowers are unable to make loan payments as a result of any of these factors, cash available for distributions to our stockholders may be reduced.

We may be limited in our ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic, market or other conditions, including by restrictions on transfer imposed by our limited partners, if any, in our operating partnership or by our lenders. Additionally, the return on our real estate assets also may be affected by a continued or exacerbated general economic slowdown experienced in the United States generally and in the local economies where our properties and the properties underlying our other real estate-related investments are located, including:

Our exposure to typical real estate investment risks could reduce our income.

Our properties, loans and other real estate-related investments will be subject to the risks typically associated with investments in real estate. Such risks include the possibility that our properties will generate operating income, rent and capital appreciation, if any, at rates lower than we anticipated or will yield returns lower than those available through other investments. Further, there are other risks by virtue of the fact that our ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions will be limited because of the general illiquidity of real estate investments. Income from our properties may be adversely affected by many factors including, but not limited to, an increase in the local supply of properties similar to our properties, newer competing properties, a decrease in the number of people interested in participating in activities related to the businesses conducted on the properties that we acquire, adverse weather conditions, changes in government regulation, international, national or local economic deterioration, increases in energy costs and other expenses affecting travel, geo-political uncertainly, including terrorism, airline strikes, outbreaks of contagious diseases and other factors which may affect travel patterns and reduce the number of travelers and tourists, increases in operating costs due to inflation and other factors that may not be offset by increased room rates, and changes in consumer tastes.

31

Table of Contents

If one or more of our tenants file for bankruptcy protection, we may be precluded from collecting all sums due.

If one or more of our tenants, or the guarantor of a tenant’s lease, commences, or has commenced against it, any proceeding under any provision of the U.S. federal bankruptcy code, as amended, or any other legal or equitable proceeding under any bankruptcy, insolvency, rehabilitation, receivership or debtor’s relief statute or law, we may be unable to collect sums due under our lease(s) with that tenant. Any or all of the tenants, or a guarantor of a tenant’s lease obligations, could be subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding. A bankruptcy or similar proceeding may bar our efforts to collect pre-bankruptcy debts from those entities or their properties unless we are able to obtain an order from the bankruptcy court. If a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would only have a general unsecured claim against the tenant, and may not be entitled to any further payments under the lease. Such an event could cause a decrease or cessation of rental payments which would reduce our cash flow and the amount available for distribution to our stockholders. In the event of a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, we cannot assure you that the tenant or its trustee will assume our lease. If a given lease, or guaranty of a lease, is not assumed, our cash flow and the amounts available for distribution to our stockholders may be adversely affected.

If a sale-leaseback transaction is re-characterized in a tenant’s bankruptcy proceeding, our financial condition could be adversely affected.

We may enter into sale-leaseback transactions, whereby we would purchase a property and then lease the same property back to the person from whom we purchased it. In the event of the bankruptcy of a tenant, a transaction structured as a sale-leaseback may be re-characterized as either a financing or a joint venture, either of which outcomes could adversely affect our financial condition, cash flow and the amount available for distributions to you.

If the sale-leaseback were re-characterized as a financing, we might not be considered the owner of the property, and as a result would have the status of a creditor in relation to the tenant. In that event, we would no longer have the right to sell or encumber our ownership interest in the property. Instead, we would have a claim against the tenant for the amounts owed under the lease, with the claim arguably secured by the property. The tenant/debtor might have the ability to propose a plan restructuring the term, interest rate and amortization schedule of its outstanding balance. If confirmed by the bankruptcy court, we could be bound by the new terms, and prevented from foreclosing our lien on the property. If the sale-leaseback were re-characterized as a joint venture, our lessee and we could be treated as co-venturers with regard to the property. As a result, we could be held liable, under some circumstances, for debts incurred by the lessee relating to the property.

Multiple property leases or loans with individual tenants or borrowers increase our risks in the event that such tenants or borrowers become financially impaired.

Defaults by a tenant or borrower may continue for some time before we determine that it is in our best interest to evict the tenant or foreclose on the property of the borrower. Tenants may lease more than one property, and borrowers may enter into more than one loan. As a result, a default by, or the financial failure of, a tenant or borrower could cause more than one property to become vacant or be in default or more than one lease or loan to become non-performing. Defaults or vacancies can reduce our rental income and funds available for distribution and could decrease the resale value of affected properties until they can be re-leased.

We may rely on various security provisions in our leases for minimum rent payments which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

Our leases may, but are not required to, have security provisions such as deposits, stock pledges and guarantees or shortfall reserves provided by a third-party tenant or operator. These security provisions may terminate at either a specific time during the lease term, once net operating income of the property exceeds a specified amount or upon the occurrence of other specified events. Certain security provisions may also have limits on the overall amount of the security under the lease. After the termination of a security feature, or in the event that the maximum limit of a security provision is reached, we may only look to the tenant to make lease payments. In the event that a security provision has expired or the maximum limit has been reached, or a provider of a security provision is unable to meet its obligations, our results of operations and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders could be adversely affected if our tenants are unable to generate sufficient funds from operations to meet minimum rent payments and the tenants do not otherwise have the resources to make rent payments.

Discretionary consumer spending may affect the profitability of certain properties we acquire.

The financial performance of certain properties in which we may invest could depend in part on a number of factors relating to or affecting discretionary consumer spending for the types of services provided by businesses operated on these properties. Unfavorable local, regional, or national economic developments or uncertainties regarding future economic prospects have reduced consumer spending in certain markets and, when combined with the lack of available debt, may adversely affect the businesses conducted on our properties and/or a tenant’s business. Any continuation of such events that leads to lower spending on leisure and lodging activities could impact our properties, a tenant’s ability to pay rent and/or our earnings on TRS investments, adversely impacting our results of operations.

32

Table of Contents

Seasonal revenue variations in certain asset classes will require the operators of those asset classes to manage cash flow properly over time so as to meet their non-seasonal scheduled rent payments to us.

Certain of the properties in which we intend to invest will generally be seasonal in nature due to geographic location, climate and weather patterns. For example, revenue and profits at ski resorts and their related properties are substantially lower and historically result in losses during the summer months due to the closure of ski operations, while many attractions properties are closed during the winter months and produce the majority of their revenues and profits during summer months. Additionally, the lodging industry also is seasonal in nature. Generally, occupancy rates and hotel revenues are greater in the second and third quarters than in the first and fourth quarters. The seasonality of the lodging industry may cause quarterly fluctuations in results of operations of our lodging properties. As a result of the seasonal nature of certain business operations that may be conducted on properties we acquire, these businesses will experience seasonal variations in revenues that may require us to reserve working capital and/or require our operators to supplement revenue in order to be able to make scheduled rent payments to us or require us to, in certain cases, adjust their lease payments so that we collect proportionately more rent during a seasonally busy operating period.

Our real estate assets may be subject to impairment charges which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

We will be required to periodically evaluate the recoverability of the carrying value of our real estate assets for impairment indicators. Factors considered in evaluating impairment of our real estate assets held for investment will include significant declines in property operating profits, recurring property operating losses and other significant adverse changes in general market conditions that are considered permanent in nature. Generally, a real estate asset held for investment is not considered impaired if the undiscounted, estimated future cash flows of the asset over its estimated holding period are in excess of the asset’s net book value at the balance sheet date. Management anticipates that it will make assumptions and estimates when considering impairments and actual results could vary materially from these assumptions and estimates.

We are uncertain of our sources for funding of future capital needs and this may subject us to certain risks associated with ongoing needs of our properties.

Neither we nor our advisor has any established financing sources. We will establish capital reserves on a property-by-property basis, as we deem appropriate to fund anticipated capital improvements. If we do not have enough capital reserves to supply needed funds for capital improvements throughout the life of our investment in a property and there is insufficient cash available from our operations or from other sources, we may be required to defer necessary improvements to a property. This may result in decreased cash flow and reductions in property values. If our reserves are insufficient to meet our cash needs, we may have to obtain financing from either affiliated or unaffiliated sources to fund our cash requirements. There can be no guarantee that these sources will be available to us. Accordingly, in the event that we develop a need for additional capital in the future for the maintenance or improvement of our properties or for any other reason, we have not identified any established sources for such funding, and we cannot assure you that such sources of funding will be available to us for potential capital needs in the future.

Increased competition for customers may reduce the ability of certain of our operators to make scheduled rent payments to us or affect our operating results.

The types of properties in which we invest are expected to face competition for customers from other similar properties, both locally and nationally. For example, competing golf courses may be located near the golf courses we own or acquire. Similarly, marinas we acquire will compete in each market with other marinas, some of which may have greater resources than our marinas, for a limited number of boaters seeking boat rental slips. Any decrease in revenues due to such competition at any of our properties may adversely affect our operators’ ability to make scheduled rent payments to us and with respect to certain of our lodging and senior living properties leased to TRS entities, may adversely affect our operating results of those properties.

33

Table of Contents

Lack of diversification of our properties may increase our exposure to the risks of adverse local economic conditions and to the risks of adverse conditions as to any particular asset class and category of a property within an asset class.

To the extent that there is a concentration of operating revenues from our properties located in a few states or geographic areas, in addition to adverse developments in the U.S. economy and in the leisure, senior living and lodging industries generally, adverse events or conditions in those markets or specific properties, such as adverse weather conditions or natural disasters, localized economic recessions or increases in state or local tax rates, could have a disproportionately adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. If our assets become concentrated in any specific asset class or any brand or other category within an asset class, an economic downturn in one or more of the classes or asset categories in which we have invested could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We may be subject to litigation which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

We may be subject to litigation, including claims relating to our operations, offerings, unrecognized preacquisition contingencies and otherwise in the ordinary course of business. Some of these claims may result in potentially significant judgments against us, some of which are not, or cannot be, insured against. We generally intend to vigorously defend ourselves; however, we cannot be certain of the ultimate outcomes of claims that may arise in the future. Resolution of these types of matters against us may result in us having to pay significant fines or settlements, which, if not insured against, or if these fines and settlements exceed insured levels, would adversely impact our earnings and cash flows. Certain litigation or the resolution of certain litigation may affect the availability or cost of some of our insurance coverage which could adversely impact our results of operations and cash flows, expose us to increased risks that would be uninsured and/or adversely impact our ability to attract officers and directors.

We will have no economic interest in the land beneath ground lease properties that we may acquire.

Certain of the properties that we may acquire may be on land owned by a governmental entity or other third party, while we own a leasehold, permit, or similar interest. This means that while we have a right to use the property, we do not retain fee ownership in the underlying land. Accordingly, with respect to such properties, we will have no economic interest in the land or buildings at the expiration of the ground lease or permit. As a result, although we will share in the income stream derived from the lease or permit, we will not share in any increase in value of the land associated with the underlying property and may forfeit rights to assets constructed on the land such as buildings and improvements at the end of the lease. Further, because we do not completely control the underlying land, the governmental or other third party owners that lease this land to us could take certain actions to disrupt our rights in the properties or our tenants’ operation of the properties or take the properties in an eminent domain proceeding. While we do not think such interruption is likely, such events are beyond our control. If the entity owning the land under one of our properties chose to disrupt our use either permanently or for a significant period of time, then the value of our assets could be impaired.

Marinas, ski resorts, golf courses, hotels and senior living facilities in which we may invest may not be readily adaptable to other uses.

Ski resorts and related properties, marinas, golf courses, hotels and senior living facilities in which we may invest are specific-use properties that have limited alternative uses. Therefore, if the operations of any of our properties in these sectors become unprofitable for our tenant or operator or for us due to industry competition, a general deterioration of the applicable industry or otherwise, then we may have great difficulty re-leasing the property or developing an alternative use for the property and the liquidation value of the property may be substantially less than would be the case if the property were readily adaptable to other uses. Should any of these events occur, our income and cash available for distribution and the value of our property portfolio could be reduced.

34

Table of Contents

We compete with other companies for investments.

We anticipate that we will compete with other companies and investors, including other REITs, real estate partnerships, mutual funds, institutional investors, specialty finance companies, opportunity funds, banks and insurance companies, for the acquisition of properties, loans and other real estate-related investments that we seek to acquire or make. Some of the other entities that we may compete with for acquisition opportunities will have substantially greater experience acquiring and owning the types of properties, loans or other real estate-related investments which we seek to acquire or make, as well as greater financial resources and a broader geographic knowledge base than we have. As a result, competition may reduce the number of suitable acquisition opportunities available to us.

Your investment may be subject to additional risks if we make international investments.

We may purchase properties located in countries outside the United States. Such investments could be affected by factors particular to the laws and business practices of those countries. These laws or business practices may expose us to risks that are different from, and in addition to, those commonly found in the United States including, but not limited to foreign currency fluctuations and additional tax burdens that may impact our results of operations, cash flows and cash available for distribution to stockholders. Specifically, foreign investments could be subject to the following risks:

We will not control the management of our properties.

In order to maintain our status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may not operate certain types of properties we acquire or participate in the decisions affecting their daily operations. Our success, therefore, will depend on our ability to select qualified and creditworthy tenants or managers who can effectively manage and operate the properties. Our tenants and managers will be responsible for maintenance and other day-to-day management of the properties or will enter into agreements with third-party operators. Our financial condition will be dependent on the ability of third-party tenants and/or managers to operate the properties successfully. We will attempt to enter into leasing agreements with tenants and management agreements with managers having substantial prior experience in the operation of the type of property being rented or managed; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to make such arrangements. Additionally, if we elect to treat property we acquire as a

35

Table of Contents

result of a borrower’s default on a loan or a tenant’s default on a lease as “foreclosure property” for federal income tax purposes, we will be required to operate that property through an independent manager over whom we will not have control. If our tenants or third-party managers are unable to operate the properties successfully or if we select unqualified managers, then such tenants and managers might not have sufficient revenue to be able to pay our rent, which could adversely affect our financial condition.

Since we intend that our properties leased to third-party tenants will generally be on a triple net basis, we will depend on our third-party tenants not only for rental income, but also to pay insurance, taxes, utilities and maintenance and repair expenses in connection with the leased facilities. Any failure by our third-party tenants to effectively conduct their operations could adversely affect their business reputation and ability to attract and retain residents in our leased facilities. We anticipate that our leases will require such tenants to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities arising in connection with our tenants’ respective businesses. We cannot assure you that our tenants will have sufficient assets, income, access to financing and insurance coverage to enable it to satisfy these indemnification obligations. Any inability or unwillingness by our tenants to make rental payments to us or to otherwise satisfy their obligations under their lease agreements with us could adversely affect us.

We may not control our joint ventures.

We may enter into a joint venture with an unaffiliated party to purchase a property or to make loans or other real estate-related investments, and the joint venture or general partnership agreement relating to that joint venture or partnership may provide that we will share with the unaffiliated party management control of the joint venture. For example, our venture partners may share approval rights on many major decisions. Those venture partners may have differing interests from ours and the power to direct the joint venture or partnership on certain matters in a manner with which we do not agree. In the event the joint venture or general partnership agreement provides that we will have sole management control of the joint venture, the agreement may be ineffective as to a third party who has no notice of the agreement, and we may therefore be unable to control fully the activities of the joint venture. Should we enter into a joint venture with another program sponsored by an affiliate, we do not anticipate that we will have sole management control of the joint venture. In addition, when we invest in properties, loans or other real estate-related investments indirectly through the acquisition of interests in entities that own such properties, loans or other real estate-related investments, we may not be able to control the management of such assets which could have negative impacts including our qualification as a REIT.

Joint venture partners may have different interests than we have, which may negatively impact our control over our ventures.

Investments in joint ventures involve the risk that our co-venturer may have economic or business interests or goals which, at a particular time, are inconsistent with our interests or goals, that the co-venturer may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions, requests, policies or objectives, or that the co-venturer may experience financial difficulties. Among other things, actions by a co-venturer might subject assets owned by the joint venture to liabilities in excess of those contemplated by the terms of the joint venture agreement or to other adverse consequences. This risk is also present when we make investments in securities of other entities. If we do not have full control over a joint venture, the value of our investment will be affected to some extent by a third party that may have different goals and capabilities than ours. As a result, joint ownership of investments and investments in other entities may adversely affect our REIT qualification, returns on investments and, therefore, cash available for distributions to our stockholders may be reduced.

It may be difficult for us to exit a joint venture after an impasse.

In our joint ventures, there will be a potential risk of impasse in some business decisions because our approval and the approval of each co-venturer may be required for some decisions. In any joint venture, we may have the right to buy the other co-venturer’s interest or to sell our own interest on specified terms and conditions in the event of an impasse regarding a sale. In the event of an impasse, it is possible that neither party will have the funds necessary to complete a buy-out. In addition, we may experience difficulty in locating a third-party purchaser for our joint venture interest and in obtaining a favorable sale price for the interest. As a result, it is possible that we may not be able to exit the relationship if an impasse develops.

36

Table of Contents

Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act may reduce our expected distributions.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1992, or the ADA, all public accommodations and commercial facilities are required to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Failure to comply with the ADA could result in the imposition of fines by the federal government or an award of damages to private litigants. Although we intend to acquire properties that substantially comply with these requirements, we may incur additional costs to comply with the ADA. In addition, a number of federal, state, and local laws may require us to modify any properties we purchase, or may restrict further renovations thereof with respect to access by disabled persons. Additional legislation could impose financial obligations or restrictions with respect to access by disabled persons. Although we believe that these costs will not have a material adverse effect on us, if required changes involve a greater amount of expenditures than we currently anticipate, our ability to make expected distributions could be adversely affected.

Our properties may be subject to environmental liabilities that could significantly impact our return from the properties and the success of our ventures.

Operations at certain of the properties we may acquire, or which are used to collateralize loans we may originate, may involve the use, handling, storage, and contracting for recycling or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances or wastes, including environmentally sensitive materials such as herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, motor oil, waste motor oil and filters, transmission fluid, antifreeze, Freon, waste paint and lacquer thinner, batteries, solvents, lubricants, degreasing agents, gasoline and diesel fuels, and sewage. Accordingly, the operations of certain properties we acquire will be subject to regulation by federal, state, and local authorities establishing health and environmental quality standards. In addition, certain of our properties may maintain and operate underground storage tanks (“USTs”) for the storage of various petroleum products. USTs are generally subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations that require testing and upgrading of USTs and the remediation of contaminated soils and groundwater resulting from leaking USTs.

As an owner of real estate, various federal and state environmental laws and regulations may require us to investigate and clean up certain hazardous or toxic substances, asbestos-containing materials, or petroleum products located on, in or emanating from our properties. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the release of hazardous substances. We may also be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and cleanup costs incurred by those parties in connection with the contamination. In addition, some environmental laws create a lien on the contaminated site in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs in connection with the contamination. Other environmental laws impose liability on a previous owner of property to the extent hazardous or toxic substances were present during the prior ownership period. A transfer of the property may not relieve an owner of such liability; therefore, we may have liability with respect to properties that we or our predecessors sold in the past.

The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination at any of our properties may adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the properties or to borrow using the properties as collateral. While our leases are expected to provide that the tenant is solely responsible for any environmental hazards created during the term of the lease, we or an operator of a site may be liable to third parties for damages and injuries resulting from environmental contamination coming from the site.

We cannot be sure that all environmental liabilities associated with the properties that we may acquire will have been identified or that no prior owner, operator or current occupant will have created an environmental condition not known to us. Moreover, we cannot be sure that: (i) future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability on us; or (ii) the environmental condition of the properties that we may acquire from time to time will not be affected by tenants and occupants of the properties, by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of the properties (such as the presence of USTs), or by third parties unrelated to us. Environmental liabilities that we may incur could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions.

In addition to the risks associated with potential environmental liabilities discussed above, compliance with environmental laws and regulations that govern our properties may require expenditures and modifications of development plans and operations that could have a detrimental effect on the operations of the properties and our

37

Table of Contents

financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders. There can be no assurance that the application of environmental laws, regulations or policies, or changes in such laws, regulations and policies, will not occur in a manner that could have a detrimental effect on any property we may acquire.

Legislation and government regulation may adversely affect the development and operations of properties we may acquire.

In addition to being subject to environmental laws and regulations, certain of the development plans and operations conducted or to be conducted on properties we may acquire require permits, licenses and approvals from certain federal, state and local authorities. For example, ski resorts often require federal permits to use U.S. Forest Service lands for their operations. Material permits, licenses or approvals may be terminated, not renewed or renewed on terms or interpreted in ways that are materially less favorable to the properties we purchase. Furthermore, laws and regulations that we or our operators are subject to may change in ways that are difficult to predict. There can be no assurance that the application of laws, regulations or policies, or changes in such laws, regulations and policies, will not occur in a manner that could have a detrimental effect on any property we may acquire, the operations of such property and the amount of rent we receive from the tenant of such property.

Governmental regulation with respect to water use by ski resorts and golf courses could negatively impact ski resorts and golf courses we acquire.

The rights of ski resorts, golf courses and related properties that we may acquire to use various water sources on or about their properties may also be subject to significant restrictions or the rights of other riparian users and the public generally. Certain ski resorts, golf courses and related properties we may acquire and the municipalities in which they are located may be dependent upon a single source of water, which sources could be historically low or inconsistent. Such a problem with water may lead to disputes and litigation over, and restrictions placed on, water use. Disputes and litigation over water use could damage the reputation of ski resorts, golf courses and related properties we may acquire and could be expensive to defend, and together with restrictions placed on water use, could have a material adverse effect on the business and operating results of our ski resorts, golf courses and related properties.

Uninsured losses or losses in excess of insured limits could result in the loss or substantial impairment of one or more of our investments.

We anticipate that the nature of the activities at certain of our properties will expose us and our operators to potential liability for personal injuries and, with respect to certain types of properties such as marinas, property damage claims. For instance, marina business activities are customarily subject to various hazards, including gasoline or other fuel spills, fires, drownings and other water-related accidents, boat storage rack collapses and other dangers relatively common in the marina industry. We will maintain, and require our tenants and operators as well as mortgagors to whom we have loaned money to maintain, insurance with respect to each of our properties that tenants lease or operate and each property securing a mortgage that we hold, including comprehensive liability, fire, flood and extended coverage insurance. There are, however, certain types of losses (such as from hurricanes, floods, earthquakes or terrorist attacks) that may be either uninsurable or not economically feasible to insure. Furthermore, an insurance provider could elect to deny or limit coverage under a claim. Should an uninsured loss or loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could lose all or a portion of our anticipated revenue stream from the affected property, as well as all or a portion of our invested capital. Accordingly, if we, as landlord, incur any liability which is not fully covered by insurance, we would be liable for the uninsured amounts, cash available for distributions to stockholders may be reduced and the value of our assets may decrease significantly. In the case of an insurance loss, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property.

Adverse weather conditions may damage certain properties we acquire and reduce our operating income or our tenants’ ability to make scheduled rent payments to us.

Weather conditions may influence revenues at certain types of properties we acquire. These adverse weather conditions include heavy snowfall (or lack thereof), hurricanes, tropical storms, high winds, heat waves, frosts, drought (or reduced rainfall levels), excessive rain, avalanches, mudslides and floods. Adverse weather could reduce the number of people participating in activities at properties we acquire. Certain properties may be

38

Table of Contents

susceptible to damage from weather conditions such as hurricanes, which may cause damage (including, but not limited to property damage and loss of revenue) that is not generally insurable at commercially reasonable rates. Further, the physical condition of properties we acquire must be satisfactory to attract visitation. In addition to severe or generally inclement weather, other factors, including, but not limited to plant disease and insect infestation, as well as the quality and quantity of water, could adversely affect the conditions at properties we own and acquire or develop. We anticipate that most properties will have some insurance coverage that will offset such losses and fund needed repairs.

Our TRS lessee structure subjects us to the risk of increased operating expenses.

Our TRS lessees will engage independent facility managers pursuant to management agreements and will pay these managers a fee for operating the facilities and reimburse certain expenses paid by these managers; however, the TRS lessee will receive all the operating profit or losses at the facility, net of corporate income tax, and we will be subject to the risk of increased operating expenses.

Our TRS structure subjects us to the risk that the leases with our TRS lessees do not qualify for tax purposes as arm’s-length, which would expose us to potentially significant tax penalties.

Lessees of properties held in our TRSs, generally, our lodging properties and certain senior living properties, will incur taxes or accrue tax benefits consistent with a “C” corporation. If the leases between us and our TRS lessees were deemed by the Internal Revenue Service to not reflect an arm’s-length transaction as that term is defined by tax law, we may be subject to significant tax penalties as the lessor that would adversely impact our profitability and our cash flows.

Our inability or that of our management companies or our tenants to maintain franchise licenses for our lodging properties could decrease our revenues.

We expect that a number of our lodging properties will be franchisees. If a franchisor terminates the franchise license, we may try either to obtain a suitable replacement franchise or to operate the property without a franchise license. The loss of a franchise license could materially and adversely affect the operations or the underlying value of the property because of the loss associated with the brand recognition and/or the marketing support and centralized reservation systems provided by the franchisor. A loss of a franchise license for one or more hotels or resorts could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and our cash flows, including our ability to service debt and make distributions to our stockholders.

There may be operational limitations associated by franchisors of our lodging properties.

We anticipate that we will operate a number of our lodging properties pursuant to franchise or license agreements with nationally recognized hotel brands. Generally, such franchise agreements will contain specific standards for, and restrictions and limitations on, the operation and maintenance of our properties in order to maintain uniformity within the franchiser system. We do not know whether those limitations may conflict with our ability to create specific business plans tailored to each property and to each market. In addition, we anticipate that such standards will be subject to change over time, in some cases at the direction of the franchisor, and may restrict our ability, as franchisee, to make improvements or modifications to a property without the consent of the franchisor.

As a condition to the maintenance of a franchise license, a franchisor could also require us to make capital expenditures, even if we do not believe the capital improvements are necessary, desirable, or likely to result in an acceptable return on our investment. We may risk losing a franchise license if we do not make franchisor-required capital expenditures.

We anticipate that franchisors will periodically inspect properties to ensure that we, our third-party tenants or our third-party management companies maintain their standards. Failure by us or one of our third-party tenants or third-party management companies to maintain these standards or comply with other terms and conditions of the applicable franchise agreement could result in a franchise license being canceled. If a franchise license terminates due to our failure to make required improvements or to otherwise comply with its terms, we may also be liable to the franchisor for a termination fee, which varies by franchisor and by property.

39

Table of Contents

In connection with terminating or changing the franchise affiliation of a property, we may be required to incur significant expenses or capital expenditures. Moreover, the loss of a franchise license could have a material adverse effect upon the operations or the underlying value of the property covered by the franchise because of the loss of associated name recognition, marketing support and centralized reservation systems provided by the franchisor.

Our tenants may generally be subject to risks associated with the employment of unionized personnel for our lodging and senior living properties.

From time to time, the operations of any lodging properties and senior living properties may be disrupted through strikes, public demonstrations or other labor actions and related publicity. We or our tenants may also incur increased legal costs and indirect labor costs as a result of such disruptions, or contract disputes or other events. Those of our lodging properties and senior living properties that are operating through a TRS and certain of the third-party managers for such properties, as well as certain of our tenants of senior living properties that we will lease to third-party tenants may be more susceptible to and potentially more impacted by labor force activities than others. One or more of our tenants or our third-party managers operating some of these types of properties may be targeted by union actions or adversely impacted by the disruption caused by organizing activities. Significant adverse disruptions caused by union activities and/or increased costs affiliated with such activities could materially and adversely affect our operations and the financial condition of the lodging and senior living properties we own through a TRS and affect the operating income of our tenants for those properties we lease to third parties.

Changing brand affiliation, changing management companies and/or expanding or renovating our hotels and resorts may not improve their financial performance or may subject us to additional costs, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition for such properties.

We may expand, renovate, change the brand affiliation and/or change the management company for lodging properties we acquire. We will undertake these actions to improve results of operations at these properties. Typically, when an owner changes managers, property performance declines for a period of time. If these expansions, renovations, changes of brand affiliation and/or changes of management companies at our lodging properties do not improve their financial performance, the operations and the financial condition of such properties may be adversely affected.

The most recent economic slowdown, continuing terrorist threats, military activity in the Middle East, natural disasters and other world events impacting the global economy have adversely affected the travel and lodging industries in the past and these adverse effects may continue or occur in the future.

As a result of terrorist and attacks and threats of attacks around the world, the war in Iraq and Afghanistan and the effects of the economic recession through 2009, the lodging industry experienced a significant decline in revenues, due to a reduction in both business and leisure travel, resulting in lower occupancy rates.

Any kind of terrorist activity within the United States, including terrorist acts against public institutions or buildings or modes of public transportation (including airlines, trains or buses) could lessen travel by the public, which could have a negative effect on any of our hotel operations. Any terrorist act directly against or affecting any of our lodging properties would also negatively affect our operations.

The lodging industry is intensely competitive, and, as a result, our managers and our tenants may be unable to compete successfully or our competitors’ marketing strategies may be more effective.

The lodging industry is intensely competitive. Such competition could reduce occupancy levels and rental revenues at our lodging properties, which would adversely affect our operations for such properties. Our properties may compete with other existing and new hotels and resorts both in their immediate vicinity and in their geographic markets. Since we do not expect to operate our properties, our revenues depend on the ability of the managers and our tenants to compete successfully with other hotels and resorts in their respective markets. Some of our

40

Table of Contents

competitors may include nationally recognized hotel brands with which we will not be associated and/or which have substantially greater marketing and financial resources than we do. The inability of our managers and our tenants to compete successfully with our competitors’ marketing strategies will adversely affect the results of operations of our properties.

The increasing use of internet travel intermediaries by consumers may result in fluctuations in operating performance during the year and otherwise adversely affect our profitability and cash flows.

We anticipate that some of the rooms at our lodging properties will be booked through Internet travel intermediaries such as Travelocity.com, Expedia.com, Orbitz.com, Hotels.com and Priceline.com. As internet bookings increase, these intermediaries may be able to obtain higher commissions, reduced room rates or other significant contract concessions from our third-party management companies. Moreover, some of these internet travel intermediaries are attempting to offer hotel and resort rooms as a commodity, by increasing the importance of price and general indicators of quality (such as “three-star downtown hotel”) at the expense of brand identification. Consumers may eventually develop brand loyalties to their reservations system rather than to our third-party management companies and/or hotel and resort brands, which could have an adverse effect on our business because we anticipate that we will rely heavily on brand identification. If the amount of sales made through Internet intermediaries increases significantly and our managers and our tenants fail to appropriately price room inventory in a manner that maximizes the opportunity for enhanced profit margins, room revenues may flatten or decrease and our profitability may be adversely affected.

Existing senior living facilities that we may acquire may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities which could cause us to incur substantial costs.

We anticipate that we will acquire operating senior living properties. Such senior living properties may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities for which we may have no recourse, or only limited recourse, against the sellers. In general, the representations and warranties provided under transaction agreements related to our acquisition of senior living properties may not survive the closing of the transactions. While we will likely seek to require the sellers to indemnify us with respect to breaches of representations and warranties that survive, such indemnification may be limited and subject to various materiality thresholds, a significant deductible or an aggregate cap on indemnifiable losses. There is no guarantee that we will recover any amounts with respect to losses due to breaches by the sellers of their representations and warranties. In addition, the total amount of costs and expenses that may be incurred with respect to liabilities associated with these facilities may exceed our expectations, and we may experience other unanticipated adverse effects, all of which may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, the market price of our common stock and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

We intend to invest in private-pay senior housing facilities, a segment of the senior living industry that is highly competitive.

Private-pay senior housing is a competitive segment of the senior living industry. Our senior living properties will compete on the basis of location, affordability, quality of service, reputation and availability of alternative care environments. Our senior living properties also will rely on the willingness and ability of seniors to select senior housing options. Our facility operators may have competitors with greater marketing and financial resources and may be able to offer incentives or reduce fees charged to residents thereby potentially reducing the perceived affordability of our facilities during downturns in the economy. Additionally, the high demand for quality caregivers in a given market could increase the costs associated with providing care and services to residents. These and other factors could cause the amount of our revenue generated by private payment sources to decline or our operating expenses to increase. In periods of weak demand, as has occurred during the current general economic recession, profitability may be negatively affected by the relatively high fixed costs of operating a senior living property.

Events which adversely affect the ability of seniors to afford our daily resident fees could cause the occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations of our senior living facilities to decline.

Costs to seniors associated with certain types of the senior living properties we intend to acquire generally are not reimbursable under government reimbursement programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. Substantially all

41

Table of Contents

of the resident fee revenues generated by our facilities will be derived from private payment sources consisting of income or assets of residents or their family members. Only seniors with income or assets meeting or exceeding certain standards can typically afford to pay our daily resident and service fees and, in some cases, entrance fees. Economic downturns such as the one recently experienced in the United States, reductions or declining growth of government entitlement programs, such as social security benefits, or stock market volatility could adversely affect the ability of seniors to afford the fees for our senior living facilities. If our tenants or managers are unable to attract and retain seniors with sufficient income, assets or other resources required to pay the fees associated with assisted and independent living services, the occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations for these facilities could decline, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The inability of seniors to sell their homes could negatively impact occupancy rates, revenues, cash flows and results of operations of the facilities we acquire.

Recent severe housing price declines and reduced home mortgage availability have negatively affected the U.S. housing market, with certain geographic areas experiencing more acute deterioration than others. Downturns in the housing markets, such as the one we currently are experiencing, could adversely affect the ability (or perceived ability) of seniors to afford the entrance fees and resident fees as potential residents frequently use the proceeds from the sale of their homes to cover the cost of these fees. Specifically, if seniors have a difficult time selling their homes, these difficulties could impact their ability to relocate into or finance their stays at our senior living facilities with private resources. If the recent volatility in the housing market continues for a prolonged period, the occupancy rates, revenues, cash flows and results of operations for these facilities could be negatively impacted.

Significant legal actions brought against the tenants or managers of our senior living facilities could subject them to increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which may affect their ability to meet their obligations to us.

The tenants or managers of our senior living properties may be subject to claims that their services have resulted in resident injury or other adverse effects. The insurance coverage that will be maintained by such tenants of managers, whether through commercial insurance or self-insurance, may not cover all claims made against them or continue to be available at a reasonable cost, if at all. In some states, insurance coverage for the risk of punitive damages arising from professional liability and general liability claims and/or litigation may not, in certain cases, be available to our tenants or managers due to state law prohibitions or limitations of availability. As a result, the tenants or managers of our senior living properties operating in these states may be liable for punitive damage awards that are either not covered or are in excess of their insurance policy limits. From time to time, there may also be increases in government investigations of long-term care providers, as well as increases in enforcement actions resulting from these investigations. Insurance is not available to cover such losses. Any adverse determination in a legal proceeding or government investigation, could lead to potential termination from government programs, large penalties and fines and otherwise have a material adverse effect on a facility operator’s financial condition. If a tenant or manager is unable to obtain or maintain insurance coverage, if judgments are obtained in excess of the insurance coverage, if a tenant or manager is required to pay uninsured punitive damages, or if a tenant or manager is subject to an uninsurable government enforcement action, the tenant or manager could be exposed to substantial additional liabilities, which could result in its bankruptcy or insolvency or have a material adverse effect on a tenant’s or manager’s business and its ability to meet its obligations to us.

Moreover, advocacy groups that monitor the quality of care at senior living facilities have sued senior housing facility operators and demanded that state and federal legislators enhance their oversight of trends in senior living property ownership and quality of care. Patients have also sued operators of senior living properties and have, in certain cases, succeeded in winning very large damage awards for alleged abuses. This litigation and potential future litigation may materially increase the costs incurred by the tenants and managers of our facilities for monitoring and reporting quality of care compliance. In addition, the cost of medical malpractice and liability insurance has increased and may continue to increase so long as the present litigation environment affecting the operations of senior living facilities continues. Increased costs could limit the ability of the tenants and managers of our facilities to meet their obligations to us, potentially decreasing our revenue and increasing our collection and litigation costs. To the extent we are required to remove or replace a manager, our revenue from the affected facility could be reduced or eliminated for an extended period of time.

42

Table of Contents

Finally, if we lease a senior living facility to our TRS lessee rather than leasing the property to a third-party tenant, our TRS lessee will become subject to state licensing requirements that apply to senior living facility operators and our TRS lessee will have increased liability resulting from events or conditions that occur at the facility, including for example injuries to residents at the facility that are caused by the negligence or misconduct of the facility operator or its employees. Insurance may not cover all such liabilities.

We will be exposed to various operational risks, liabilities and claims with respect to our senior living properties that may adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and/or increase our costs.

Through our ownership of senior living properties, we will be exposed to various operational risks, liabilities and claims with respect to our facilities in addition to those generally applicable to ownership of real property. These risks include fluctuations in occupancy levels, the inability to achieve economic resident fees (including anticipated increases in those fees), rent control regulations, and increases in labor costs (as a result of unionization or otherwise) and services. Any one or a combination of these factors, together with other market and business conditions beyond our control, could result in operating deficiencies at our senior living properties, which could have a material adverse effect on our facility operators’ results of operations and their ability to meet their obligations to us and operate our facilities effectively and efficiently, which in turn could adversely affect us.

Failure to succeed in the senior living market may have adverse consequences on our performance.

Other than our chairman and vice chairman of the board, neither we nor the management of our advisor has experience in owning or operating senior living facilities. The experience of the management of our advisor in other classes of property, such as leisure and lodging, does not ensure that we will be able to operate successfully in the senior living market. Our success in this market sector will be dependent, in part, upon our ability to evaluate local senior living market conditions, identify appropriate acquisition opportunities, and find qualified tenants or, where properties are acquired through a TRS, to engage and retain qualified independent managers to operate these properties. In addition, due to our inexperience in acquiring senior living properties, we may abandon opportunities to enter a local market or acquire a property that we have begun to explore for any reason and may, as a result, fail to recover expenses already incurred.

Unanticipated expenses and insufficient demand for senior living properties could adversely affect our profitability.

As part of our investment strategy, we may acquire senior living properties in geographic areas where potential customers may not be familiar with the benefits of and care provided by that particular property. As a result, we may have to incur costs relating to the opening, operation and promotion of such facilities that are substantially greater than those incurred in other areas where the facilities are better known by the public. These properties may attract fewer residents than other senior living facilities we may acquire and may have increased costs, such as for marketing expenses, adversely affecting the results of operations of such facilities as compared to those facilities that are better known.

Our failure or the failure of the tenants and managers of our facilities to comply with licensing and certification requirements, the requirements of governmental programs, fraud and abuse regulations or new legislative developments may materially adversely affect the operations of our senior living properties.

The operations of our senior living properties are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations that are subject to frequent and substantial changes resulting from legislation, adoption of rules and regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations of existing laws. The ultimate timing or effect of any changes in these laws and regulations cannot be predicted. Failure to obtain licensure or loss or suspension of licensure or certification may prevent a facility from operating or result in a suspension of certain revenue sources until all licensure or certification issues have been resolved. Facilities may also be affected by changes in accreditation standards or procedures of accrediting agencies that are recognized by governments in the certification process. State laws may require compliance with extensive standards governing operations and agencies administering those laws regularly inspect such facilities and investigate complaints. Failure to comply with all regulatory requirements could result in the loss of the ability to provide or bill and receive payment for health care services at our senior living facilities. Additionally, transfers of operations of certain senior living facilities are

43

Table of Contents

subject to regulatory approvals not required for transfers of other types of commercial operations and real estate. We may have no direct control over the tenant’s or manager’s ability to meet regulatory requirements and failure to comply with these laws, regulations and requirements may materially adversely affect the operations of these properties.

Cost control and other health care reform measures may reduce reimbursement revenue available to certain of our senior living properties.

The health care industry is facing various challenges, including increased government and private payor pressure on health care providers to control costs and the vertical and horizontal consolidation of health care providers. The pressure to control health care costs has intensified in recent years as a result of the national health care reform debate and has continued as Congress attempts to slow the rate of growth of federal health care expenditures as part of its effort to balance the federal budget. Similar debates are ongoing at the state level in many states. These trends are likely to lead to reduced or slower growth in reimbursement for services provided at some of our senior living properties and could therefore result in reduced profitability of such properties, adversely affecting our rental income or results of operations.

Each year, legislative proposals are introduced or proposed in Congress and in some state legislatures that would effect major changes in the health care system, nationally or at the state level. We cannot predict whether any proposals will be adopted or, if adopted, what effect, if any, these proposals would have on those of our senior living facilities offering health care services and, thus, our business.

Health care, including the long-term care and assisted living sectors, remains a dynamic, evolving industry. On March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was enacted and on March 30, 2010, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act was enacted, which in part modified the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Together, the two Acts serve as the primary vehicle for comprehensive health care reform in the United States. The two Acts are intended to reduce the number of individuals in the United States without health insurance and effect significant other changes to the ways in which health care is organized, delivered and reimbursed. The legislation will become effective in a phased approach, beginning in 2010 and concluding in 2018. At this time, the effects of the legislation and its impact on our business are not yet known. Our business could be materially and adversely affected by the two Acts and further governmental initiatives undertaken pursuant to the two Acts.

Although we intend to target senior living properties in markets that have high barriers to entry for new facilities, barriers to entry in the senior living property industry are not substantial in all markets.

Consequently, the development of new senior living properties could outpace demand. If the development of new senior living housing facilities outpaces demand for those asset types in the markets in which our facilities are located, those markets may become saturated. Overbuilding in our markets, therefore, could cause us to experience decreased occupancy, reduced operating margins and lower profitability.

Termination of resident lease agreements could adversely affect our revenues and earnings for senior living properties providing assisted living services.

Applicable regulations governing assisted living facilities generally require written resident lease agreements with each resident. Most of these regulations also require that each resident have the right to terminate the resident lease agreement for any reason on reasonable notice or upon the death of the resident. The operators of senior living properties cannot contract with residents to stay for longer periods of time, unlike typical apartment leasing arrangements with terms of up to one year or longer. In addition, the resident turnover rate in our facilities may be difficult to predict. If a large number of resident lease agreements terminate at or around the same time, and if our units remained unoccupied, then our tenants may have difficulty making rental payments and our revenues and earnings could be adversely affected.

44

Table of Contents

The healthcare facilities we may acquire, such as medical office buildings and surgery centers, and our health and wellness-related facilities may be unable to compete successfully.

The healthcare facilities we may acquire, such as medical office buildings and surgery centers and our health and wellness-related facilities often face competition from nearby hospitals and other medical office buildings that provide comparable services. Some of those competing facilities are owned by governmental agencies and supported by tax revenues, and others are owned by nonprofit corporations and may be supported to a large extent by endowments and charitable contributions. These types of support are not available to our facilities.

Similarly, our tenants face competition from other medical practices in nearby hospitals and other medical facilities. Our tenants’ failure to compete successfully with these other practices could adversely affect their ability to make rental payments, which could adversely affect our rental revenues. Further, from time to time and for reasons beyond our control, referral sources, including physicians and managed care organizations, may change their lists of hospitals or physicians to which they refer patients. This could adversely affect our tenants’ ability to make rental payments, which could adversely affect our rental revenues.

Any reduction in rental revenues resulting from the inability of our medical office buildings and healthcare-related facilities and our tenants to compete successfully may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

If we acquire healthcare facilities, some tenants of medical office buildings, surgery centers, and other healthcare facilities will be subject to fraud and abuse laws, the violation of which by a tenant may jeopardize the tenant’s ability to make rent payments to us.

There are various federal and state laws prohibiting fraudulent and abusive business practices by healthcare providers who participate in, receive payments from or are in a position to make referrals in connection with government-sponsored healthcare programs, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Any lease arrangements we may enter into with certain tenants could also be subject to these fraud and abuse laws concerning Medicare and Medicaid. These laws include:

Each of these laws includes criminal and/or civil penalties for violations that range from punitive sanctions, damage assessments, penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments and/or exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Certain laws, such as the False Claims Act, allow for individuals to bring whistleblower actions on behalf of the government for violations thereof. Additionally, states in which the facilities are located may have similar fraud and abuse laws. Investigation by a federal or state governmental body for violation of fraud and abuse laws or imposition of any of these penalties upon one of our tenants could jeopardize that tenant’s ability to operate or to make rent payments, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make cash distributions.

45

Table of Contents

Our investments in common equity securities will be subject to specific risks relating to the particular issuer of the securities and may be subject to the general risks of investing in subordinated real estate securities.

We may invest in real estate common equity securities of both publicly traded and private real estate companies. Investments in real estate common equity securities involve special risks relating to the particular issuer of the equity securities, including the financial condition and business outlook of the issuer. Issuers of real estate common equity securities generally invest in real estate or real estate related assets and are subject to the inherent risks associated with real estate related investments discussed in this prospectus, including risks relating to rising interest rates.

Real estate common equity securities are generally unsecured and may also be subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. As a result, investments in real estate common equity securities are subject to risks of (i) limited liquidity in the secondary trading market; (ii) substantial market price volatility resulting from changes in prevailing interest rates; (iii) subordination to the prior claims of banks and other senior lenders to the issuer; (iv) the operation of mandatory sinking fund or call/redemption provisions during periods of declining interest rates that could cause the issuer to reinvest redemption proceeds in lower yielding assets; (v) the possibility that earnings of the issuer may be insufficient to meet its debt service and distribution obligations; and (vi) the declining creditworthiness and potential for insolvency of the issuer during periods of rising interest rates and economic downturn. These risks may adversely affect the value of outstanding real estate common equity securities and the ability of the issuers thereof to repay principal and interest or make distribution payments.

Investments in preferred equity securities involve a greater risk of loss than traditional debt financing.

We may invest in real estate preferred equity securities, which involve a higher degree of risk than traditional debt financing due to a variety of factors, including the risk that such investments are subordinate to traditional loans and are not collateralized by property underlying the investment. Furthermore, should the issuer default on our investment, we would only be able to proceed against the entity in which we have an interest, and not the property owned by such entity and underlying our investment. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment.

A portion of our real estate securities investments may be illiquid and we may not be able to adjust our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions.

Certain of the real estate securities that we may purchase in connection with privately negotiated transactions will not be registered under the relevant securities laws, resulting in a prohibition against their transfer, sale, pledge or other disposition except in a transaction that is exempt from the registration requirements of, or is otherwise in accordance with, those laws. As a result, our ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be relatively limited. The mezzanine and bridge loans we may purchase will be particularly illiquid investments due to their short life, their unsuitability for securitization and the greater difficulty of recoupment in the event of a borrower’s default.

Lending Related Risks

Decreases in the value of the property underlying our mortgage loans might decrease the value of our assets.

The mortgage loans in which we plan to invest are collateralized by underlying real estate. When we make these loans, we are at risk of default on these loans caused by many conditions beyond our control, including local and other economic conditions affecting real estate values and interest rate levels. We do not know whether the values of the properties collateralizing mortgage loans will remain at the levels existing on the dates of origination of the loans. If the values of the underlying properties drop or in some instances fail to rise, our risk will increase and the value of our assets may decrease.

46

Table of Contents

The mortgage, bridge and mezzanine loans in which we may invest and/or originate will be subject to delinquency, foreclosure and loss, which could result in losses to us.

Commercial mortgage loans are collateralized by commercial property. The ability of a borrower to repay a loan collateralized by a commercial property typically is dependent primarily upon the successful operation of the underlying property, rather than on any independent income or assets of the borrower. A borrower’s net income and, therefore, its ability to pay us, may be affected by a variety of factors, including number and mix of tenants, property management decisions, property location and condition, competition, the occurrence of any uninsured casualty at the property, changes in national, regional or local economic conditions and/or specific industry segments, declines in regional or local real estate values, declines in regional or local rental or occupancy rates, increases in interest rates, real estate tax rates and other operating expenses, changes in governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies, including environmental legislation, acts of God, terrorism, social unrest and civil disturbances.

If a borrower defaults under a mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loan we have made, we will bear the risk of loss of principal to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the principal and accrued interest of the loan. In the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, the loan to such borrower will be deemed to be collateralized only to the extent of the value of the underlying collateral at the time of bankruptcy (as determined by the bankruptcy court), and the lien securing the loan will be subject to the avoidance powers of the bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession to the extent the lien is unenforceable under state law. Foreclosure on a loan can be an expensive and lengthy process, which could have a substantial negative effect on our anticipated return on the foreclosed loan. If we determine that the sale of a foreclosed property is in our best interest, delays in the sale of such property could negatively impact the price we receive and we may not be receiving any income from the property although we will be required to incur expenses, such as for maintenance costs, insurance costs and property taxes. The longer we are required to hold the property, the greater the potential negative impact on our revenues and results of operations. In addition, any restructuring, workout, foreclosure or other exercise of remedies with respect to loans that we have made or acquired could create income tax costs or make it more difficult for us to qualify as a REIT. If we acquire a property by way of foreclosure or a deed in lieu of foreclosure, we may be subject to a 100% tax on gain from a subsequent resale of that property under the prohibited transaction rules. See “Federal Income Tax Considerations — Requirements for Qualification as a REIT — Operational Requirements — Prohibited Transactions.” Alternatively, if we make an election to treat such property as “foreclosure property” under applicable income tax laws, we may avoid the 100% tax on prohibited transactions, but the income from the sale or operation of the property may be subject to corporate income tax at the highest applicable rate (currently 35%).

The loans we originate or invest in will be subject to interest rate fluctuations.

If we invest in fixed-rate, long-term loans and interest rates increase, the loans could yield a return that is lower than then-current market rates. Conversely, if interest rates decline, we will be adversely affected to the extent that loans are prepaid, because we may not be able to make new loans at the previously higher interest rate. If we invest in variable interest rate loans, if interest rates decrease, our revenues will likewise decrease.

Financing Related Risks

Instability in the credit market and real estate market could have a material adverse affect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to you.

We may not be able to obtain financing for investments on terms and conditions acceptable to us, if at all. Recently, domestic and international financial markets have experienced unusual volatility and uncertainty. If this volatility and uncertainty persists, our ability to borrow monies to finance the purchase of, or other activities related to, real estate assets will be significantly impacted. If we are unable to borrow monies on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, we likely will have to reduce the number of properties we can purchase, and the return on the properties we do purchase likely will be lower. In addition, if we pay fees to lock-in a favorable interest rate, falling interest rates or other factors could require us to forfeit these fees. Additionally, the reduction in equity and debt capital resulting from turmoil in the capital markets has resulted in fewer buyers seeking to acquire commercial properties leading to lower property values and the continuation of these conditions could adversely impact our timing and ability to sell our properties.

47

Table of Contents

In addition to volatility in the credit markets, the real estate market is subject to fluctuation and can be impacted by factors such as general economic conditions, supply and demand, availability of financing and interest rates. To the extent we purchase real estate in an unstable market, we are subject to the risk that if the real estate market ceases to attract the same level of capital investment in the future that it attracts at the time of our purchases, or the number of parties seeking to acquire properties decreases, the value of our investments may not appreciate or may decrease significantly below the amount we pay for these investments.

Mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings will increase our business risks.

We are permitted to acquire real properties and other real estate-related investments, including entity acquisitions, by assuming either existing financing collateralized by the asset or by borrowing new funds. In addition, we may incur or increase our mortgage debt by obtaining loans collateralized by some or all of our assets to obtain funds to acquire additional investments or to pay distributions to our stockholders. If necessary, we also may borrow funds to satisfy the requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our annual “REIT taxable income,” or otherwise as is necessary or advisable to assure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

Our articles of incorporation provide that we may not borrow more than 300% of the value of our net assets without the approval of a majority of our independent directors and the borrowing must be disclosed and explained to our stockholders in our first quarterly report after such approval. Borrowing may be risky if the cash flow from our properties and other real estate-related investments is insufficient to meet our debt obligations. In addition, our lenders may seek to impose restrictions on future borrowings, distributions and operating policies, including with respect to capital expenditures and asset dispositions. If we mortgage assets or pledge equity as collateral and we cannot meet our debt obligations, then the lender could take the collateral, and we would lose the asset or equity and the income we were deriving from the asset.

Our revenues will be highly dependent on operating results of and lease payments from our properties and interest payments from loans that we make. Defaults by our tenants or borrowers would reduce our cash available for the repayment of our outstanding debt and for distributions.

Our ability to repay any outstanding debt and make distributions to stockholders depends upon the ability of our managers to generate sufficient operating income and our tenants and borrowers to make payments to us, and their ability to make these payments will depend primarily on their ability to generate sufficient revenues in excess of operating expenses from businesses conducted on our properties. For example, the ability of our golf tenants to make their scheduled rent payments to us will be dependent upon their ability to generate sufficient operating income at the golf courses they operate. A tenant’s failure or delay in making scheduled rent payments to us or a borrower’s failure to make debt service payments to us may result from the tenant or borrower realizing reduced revenues at the properties it operates.

Defaults on our borrowings may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Defaults on loans collateralized by a property we own may result in foreclosure actions and our loss of the property or properties securing the loan that is in default. Such legal actions are expensive. For tax purposes, in general a foreclosure would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt collateralized by the property. If the outstanding balance of the debt exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on the foreclosure, all or a portion of such taxable income may be subject to tax, and/or required to be distributed to our stockholders in order for us to qualify as a REIT. In such case, we would not receive any cash proceeds to enable us to pay such tax or make such distributions. If any mortgages contain cross collateralization or cross default provisions, more than one property may be affected by a default. If any of our properties are foreclosed upon due to a default, our financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to stockholders will be adversely affected.

48

Table of Contents

Financing arrangements involving balloon payment obligations may adversely affect our ability to make distributions.

We may enter into fixed-term financing arrangements which would require us to make “balloon” payments at maturity. Our ability to make a balloon payment at maturity is uncertain and may depend upon our ability to obtain additional financing or sell a particular property. At the time the balloon payment is due, we may not be able to raise equity or refinance the balloon payment on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. These refinancing or property sales could negatively impact the rate of return to stockholders and the timing of disposition of our assets. In addition, payments of principal and interest may leave us with insufficient cash to pay the distributions that we are required to pay to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

We may borrow money that bears interest at a variable rate and, from time to time, we may pay mortgage loans or refinance our properties in a rising interest rate environment. Accordingly, increases in interest rates could increase our interest costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating cash flow and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

When providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affect our distributions, operating policies and ability to incur additional debt. Such limitations hamper our flexibility and may impair our ability to achieve our operating plans including maintaining our REIT status.

We may acquire various financial instruments for purposes of “hedging” or reducing our risks which may be costly and/or ineffective and will reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

We may engage in hedging transactions to manage the risk of changes in interest rates, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made, or ordinary obligations incurred or to be incurred, by us. We may use derivative financial instruments for this purpose, collateralized by our assets and investments. Derivative instruments may include interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap or floor contracts, futures or forward contracts, options or repurchase agreements. Our actual hedging decisions will be determined in light of the facts and circumstances existing at the time of the hedge and may differ from time to time. Hedging activities may be costly or become cost-prohibitive and we may have difficulty entering into hedging transactions.

To the extent that we use derivative financial instruments to hedge against exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations, we will be exposed to credit risk, basis risk and legal enforceability risks. In this context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. Basis risk occurs when the index upon which the contract is based is more or less variable than the index upon which the hedged asset or liability is based, thereby making the hedge less effective. Finally, legal enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks, including the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or fail to perform its obligations under, the derivative contract. We may be unable to manage these risks effectively.

Tax Related Risks

Failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect our operations and our ability to pay distributions to you.

Arnold & Porter LLP has rendered an opinion to us that we will be organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code for our taxable year ending December 31, 2011 or our first year of material operations, and that our proposed method of operations will enable us to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT beginning with our taxable year ending December 31, 2011 or our first year of material operations. This opinion is based upon, among

49

Table of Contents

other things, our representations as to the manner in which we are and will be owned and the manner in which we will invest in and operate assets. However, our qualification as a REIT will depend upon our ability to meet requirements regarding our organization and ownership, distributions of our income, the nature and diversification of our income and assets and other tests imposed by the Code. Arnold & Porter LLP will not review our compliance with the REIT qualification standards on an ongoing basis, and we may fail to satisfy the REIT requirements in the future. Also, this opinion represents Arnold & Porter LLP’s legal judgment based on the law in effect as of the date of this prospectus. Arnold & Porter LLP’s opinion is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or the courts. Future legislative, judicial or administrative changes to the federal income tax laws could be applied retroactively, which could result in our disqualification as a REIT.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to federal and state income tax on our taxable income for that year at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of losing our REIT status. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for distribution to stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer qualify for the distributions-paid deduction, but we would no longer be required to pay distributions. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax.

Our leases may be re-characterized as financings which would eliminate depreciation deductions on our properties.

We believe that we would be treated as the owner of properties where we would own the underlying real estate, except with respect to leases structured as “financing leases,” which would constitute financings for federal income tax purposes. If the lease of a property does not constitute a lease for federal income tax purposes and is re-characterized as a secured financing by the Internal Revenue Service, then we believe the lease should be treated as a financing arrangement and the income derived from such a financing arrangement should satisfy the 75% and the 95% gross income tests for REIT qualification as it would be considered to be interest on a loan collateralized by real property. Nevertheless, the re-characterization of a lease in this fashion may have adverse tax consequences for us. In particular, we would not be entitled to claim depreciation deductions with respect to the property (although we should be entitled to treat part of the payments we would receive under the arrangement as the repayment of principal and not rent). In such event, in some taxable years our taxable income, and the corresponding obligation to distribute 90% of such income, would be increased. With respect to leases structured as “financing leases,” we will report income received as interest income and will not take depreciation deductions related to the real property. Any increase in our distribution requirements may limit our ability to invest in additional properties and to make additional mortgage loans. No assurance can be provided that the Internal Revenue Service would re-characterize such transactions as financings that would qualify under the 95% and 75% gross income tests. See “Federal Income Tax Considerations — Requirements for Qualification as a REIT — Operational Requirements — Gross Income Tests.”

Re-characterization of sale-leaseback transactions may cause us to lose our REIT status.

We may purchase properties and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. While we will use our best efforts to structure any such sale-leaseback transaction so that the lease will be characterized as a “true lease,” thereby allowing us to be treated as the owner of the property for federal income tax purposes, the IRS could challenge such characterization. In the event that any sale-leaseback transaction is challenged and re-characterized as a financing transaction or loan for federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such property would be disallowed. If a sale-leaseback transaction were so re-characterized, we might fail to satisfy the REIT qualification “asset tests” or the “income tests” and, consequently, lose our REIT status effective with the year of re-characterization. Alternatively, the amount of our REIT taxable income could be recalculated, which might also cause us to fail to meet the distribution requirement for a taxable year.

Excessive non-real estate asset values may jeopardize our REIT status.

In order to qualify as a REIT, among other requirements, at least 75% of the value of our assets must consist of investments in real estate, investments in other REITs, cash and cash equivalents and government securities. Accordingly, the value of any other property that is not considered a real estate asset for federal income tax purposes must represent in the aggregate not more than 25% of our total assets. In addition, under federal income tax law, we may not own securities in, or make loans to, any one company (other than a REIT, a qualified REIT subsidiary or a TRS) which represent in excess of 10% of the voting securities or 10% of the value of all securities of that company (other than certain securities described in “Federal Income Tax Considerations — Operational Requirements — Asset Tests”), or which have, in the aggregate, a value in excess of 5% of our total assets, and we may not own securities of one or more TRSs which have, in the aggregate, a value in excess of 25% of our total assets.

The 75%, 25%, 10% and 5% REIT qualification tests are determined at the end of each calendar quarter. If we fail to meet any such test at the end of any calendar quarter, and such failure is not remedied within 30 days after the close of such quarter, we will cease to qualify as a REIT, unless certain requirements are satisfied, as described more fully in “Federal Income Tax Considerations — Operational Requirements — Asset Tests.”

50

Table of Contents

We may have to borrow funds or sell assets to meet our distribution requirements.

Subject to some adjustments that are unique to REITs, a REIT generally must distribute 90% of its taxable income to its stockholders. For the purpose of determining taxable income, we may be required to accrue interest, rent and other items treated as earned for tax purposes, but that we have not yet received. In addition, we may be required not to accrue as expenses for tax purposes some items which actually have been paid, or some of our deductions might be subject to certain disallowance rules under the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, we could have taxable income in excess of cash available for distribution. If this occurs, we may have to borrow funds or liquidate some of our assets in order to meet the distribution requirements applicable to a REIT.

Despite our REIT status, we remain subject to various taxes which would reduce operating cash flow if and to the extent certain liabilities are incurred.

Even if we qualify as a REIT, we are subject to some federal, foreign and state and local taxes on our income and property that could reduce operating cash flow, including but not limited to: (i) tax on any undistributed real estate investment trust taxable income; (ii) “alternative minimum tax” on our items of tax preference; (iii) certain state income taxes (because not all states treat REITs the same as they are treated for federal income tax purposes); (iv) a tax equal to 100% of net gain from “prohibited transactions”; (v) tax on gains from the sale of certain “foreclosure property”; (vi) tax on gains of sale of certain “built-in gain” properties; and (vii) certain taxes and penalties if we fail to comply with one or more REIT qualification requirements, but nevertheless qualify to maintain our status as a REIT. Foreclosure property includes property with respect to which we acquire ownership by reason of a borrower’s default on a loan or possession by reason of a tenant’s default on a lease. We may elect to treat certain qualifying property as “foreclosure property,” in which case, the income from such property will be treated as qualifying income under the 75% and 95% gross income tests for three years following such acquisition. To qualify for such treatment, we must satisfy additional requirements, including that we operate the property through an independent contractor after a short grace period. We will be subject to tax on our net income from foreclosure property. Such net income generally means the excess of any gain from the sale or other disposition of foreclosure property and income derived from foreclosure property that otherwise does not qualify for the 75% gross income test, over the allowable deductions that relate to the production of such income. Any such tax incurred will reduce the amount of cash available for distribution. See “Federal Income Tax Considerations — Taxation of CNL Diversified Lifestyle Properties, Inc.”

Our investment strategy may cause us to incur penalty taxes, lose our REIT status, or own and sell properties through TRSs, each of which would diminish the return to our stockholders.

The sale of one or more of our properties may be considered prohibited transactions under the Code. Any “inventory-like” sales, such as the sale of condominiums, would almost certainly be considered such a prohibited transaction. See “Federal Income Tax Considerations — Requirements for Qualification as a REIT — Operational Requirements — Prohibited Transactions.” If we are deemed to have engaged in a “prohibited transaction” (i.e., we sell a property held by us primarily for sale in the ordinary course of our trade or business), all income that we derive from such sale would be subject to a 100% penalty tax. The Code sets forth a safe harbor for REITs that wish to sell property without risking the imposition of the 100% penalty tax. The principal requirements of the safe harbor are that: (i) the REIT must hold the applicable property for not less than two years for the production of rental income prior to its sale; (ii) the aggregate expenditures made by the REIT, or any partner of the REIT, during the two-year period preceding the date of sale which are includible in the basis of the property do not exceed 30% of the net selling price of the property; and (iii) the REIT does not make more than seven sales of property during the taxable year, the aggregate adjusted bases of property sold during the taxable year does not exceed 10% of the aggregate bases of all of the REIT’s assets as of the beginning of the taxable year or the fair market value of property sold during the taxable year does not exceed 10% of the fair market value of all of the REIT’s assets as of the beginning of the taxable year. Given our investment strategy, the sale of one or more of our properties may not fall within the prohibited transaction safe harbor.

If we desire to sell a property pursuant to a transaction that does not fall within the safe harbor, we may be able to avoid the prohibited transaction tax if we acquired the property through a TRS, or acquired the property and transferred it to a TRS for a non-tax business purpose prior to the sale (i.e., for a reason other than the avoidance of taxes). We may decide to forego the use of a TRS in a transaction that does not meet the safe harbor based on our

51

Table of Contents

own internal analysis, the opinion of counsel or the opinion of other tax advisors that the disposition will not be subject to the prohibited transaction tax. In cases where a property disposition is not effected through a TRS, the Internal Revenue Service could successfully assert that the disposition constitutes a prohibited transaction, in which event all of the net income from the sale of such property will be payable as a tax which will have a negative impact on cash flow and the ability to make cash distributions.

As a REIT, the value of our ownership interests held in our TRSs may not exceed 25% of the value of all of our assets at the end of any calendar quarter. If the Internal Revenue Service were to determine that the value of our interests in all of our TRSs exceeded 25% of the value of our total assets at the end of any calendar quarter, then we would fail to qualify as a REIT. If we determine it to be in our best interest to own a substantial number of our properties through one or more TRSs, then it is possible that the Internal Revenue Service may conclude that the value of our interests in our TRSs exceeds 25% of the value of our total assets at the end of any calendar quarter and therefore cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT. Additionally, as a REIT, no more than 25% of our gross income with respect to any year may be from sources other than real estate. Distributions paid to us from a TRS are considered to be non-real estate income. Therefore, we may fail to qualify as a REIT if distributions from all of our TRSs, when aggregated with all other non-real estate income with respect to any one year, are more than 25% of our gross income with respect to such year.

You may have current tax liability on distributions you elect to reinvest in our common stock.

If you participate in our distribution reinvestment plan, you will be deemed to have received, and for income tax purposes will be taxed on, the amount reinvested in shares of our common stock to the extent the amount reinvested was not a tax-free return of capital. In addition, you will be treated for tax purposes as having received an additional distribution to the extent the shares are purchased at a discount to fair market value. As a result, unless you are a tax-exempt entity, you may have to use funds from other sources to pay your tax liability on the value of the shares of common stock received.

If our operating partnership fails to maintain its status as a partnership, its income may be subject to taxation, which would reduce the cash available to us for distribution to our stockholders.

We intend to maintain the status of our operating partnership as either a disregarded entity or an entity taxable as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. However, if the Internal Revenue Service were to successfully challenge the status of the operating partnership as a disregarded entity or an entity taxable as a partnership, our operating partnership would be taxable as a corporation. In such event, this would reduce the amount of distributions that the operating partnership could make to us. Additionally, this could also result in our losing REIT status, and becoming subject to a corporate level tax on our income. This would substantially reduce the cash available to us to pay distributions and the return on your investment. In addition, if any of the partnerships or limited liability companies through which our operating partnership owns its properties, in whole or in part, loses its characterization as a partnership or disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes, it would be subject to taxation as a corporation, thereby reducing distributions to our operating partnership. Such a re-characterization of an underlying property owner could also threaten our ability to maintain REIT status.

Equity participation in mortgage, bridge, mezzanine or other loans may result in taxable income and gains from these properties that could adversely impact our REIT status.

If we participate under a loan in any appreciation of the properties securing the mortgage loan or its cash flow and the Internal Revenue Service characterizes this participation as “equity” or as a “shared appreciation mortgage,” we might have to recognize income, gains and other items from the property as if an equity investor for federal income tax purposes. This could affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect us or your investment in us.

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of the federal income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in shares of our common stock. Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to occur, and we cannot assure you that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of our stockholders. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an

52

Table of Contents

investment in our shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets. You are urged to consult with your own tax advisor with respect to the impact of recent legislation and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments on your investment in our shares. You also should note that our counsel’s tax opinion is based upon our representations and existing law and Treasury Regulations, applicable as of the date of its opinion, all of which are subject to change, either prospectively or retroactively.

Although REITs continue to receive favorable tax treatment (a deduction for dividends paid), it is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for a company that invests in real estate to elect to be taxed for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a corporation. As a result, our articles of incorporation provide our board of directors with the power, under certain circumstances, to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election and cause us to be taxed as a corporation, without the vote of our stockholders. Our board of directors has fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders in accordance with the Maryland General Corporation Law and could only cause such changes in our tax treatment if it determines in good faith that such changes are in the best interest of our stockholders.

Risks Related to Investments by Tax-Exempt Entities and Benefit Plans Subject to ERISA

If our assets are deemed “plan assets” for the purposes of ERISA, we could be subject to excise taxes on certain prohibited transactions.

We believe that our assets will not be deemed to be “plan assets” for purposes of ERISA and/or the Code, but we have not requested an opinion of counsel to that effect, and no assurances can be given that our assets will never constitute “plan assets”. If our assets were deemed to be “plan assets” for purposes of ERISA and/or the Code, among other things, (a) certain of our transactions could constitute “prohibited transactions” under ERISA and the Code, and (b) ERISA’s prudence and other fiduciary standards would apply to our investments (and might not be met). Among other things, ERISA makes plan fiduciaries personally responsible for any losses resulting to the plan from any breach of fiduciary duty, and the Code imposes nondeductible excise taxes on prohibited transactions. If such excise taxes were imposed on us, the amount of funds available for us to make distributions to stockholders would be reduced. For more information, see “Plan of Distribution — Certain Benefit Plan Considerations.”

Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure

The limit on the percentage of shares of our stock that any person may own may discourage a takeover or business combination that may benefit our stockholders.

Our articles of incorporation restrict the direct or indirect ownership by one person or entity to no more than 9.8%, by number or value, of any class or series of our equity stock (which includes common stock and any preferred stock we may issue). This restriction may deter individuals or entities from making tender offers for shares of our common stock on terms that might be financially attractive to stockholders or which may cause a change in our management. This ownership restriction may also prohibit business combinations that would have otherwise been approved by our board of directors and stockholders and may also decrease your ability to sell your shares of our common stock.

Our board of directors can take many actions without stockholder approval which could have a material adverse effect on the distributions you receive from us and/or could reduce the value of our assets.

Our board of directors has overall authority to conduct our operations. This authority includes significant flexibility. For example, our board of directors can: (i) list our stock on a national securities exchange or include our stock for quotation on the National Market System of the NASDAQ Stock Market without obtaining stockholder approval; (ii) prevent the ownership, transfer and/or accumulation of shares in order to protect our status as a REIT or for any other reason deemed to be in the best interests of the stockholders; (iii) authorize and issue additional shares of any class or series of stock without obtaining stockholder approval, which could dilute your ownership; (iv) change our advisor’s compensation, and employ and compensate affiliates; (v) direct our investments toward investments that will not appreciate over time, such as loans and building-only properties, with the land owned by a third party; and (vi) establish and change minimum creditworthiness standards with respect to tenants. Any of these actions could reduce the value of our assets without giving you, as a stockholder, the right to vote.

53

Table of Contents

You will be limited in your right to bring claims against our officers and directors.

Our articles of incorporation provide generally that a director or officer will be indemnified against liability as a director or officer so long as he or she performs his or her duties in accordance with the applicable standard of conduct and without negligence or misconduct in the case of our officers and non-independent directors, and without gross negligence or willful misconduct in the case of our independent directors. In addition, our articles of incorporation provide that, subject to the applicable limitations set forth therein or under Maryland law, no director or officer will be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary or other damages. Our articles of incorporation also provide that, with the approval of our board of directors, we may indemnify our employees and agents for losses they may incur by reason of their service in such capacities so long as they satisfy these requirements. We will enter into separate indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against these persons than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by these persons in some cases.

Investors in this offering will not have preemptive rights.

Investors in this offering do not have preemptive rights to any shares we may issue in the future. We may issue, without stockholder approval, one or more classes of preferred stock or additional shares of common stock. These issuances may reduce the value of the shares purchased by investors in this offering. Our board of directors may amend our articles of incorporation from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of authorized shares of capital stock or the number of authorized shares of capital stock of any class or series without stockholder approval. Payment of any distribution preferences of outstanding preferred stock we issue would reduce the amount of funds available for the payment of distributions on our common stock. Further, holders of preferred stock are normally entitled to receive payment in the event we liquidate, dissolve or wind up before any payment is made to our common stockholders which may reduce the amount available to common stockholders. In addition, under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock or additional shares of common stock may render more difficult or tend to discourage:

Our use of an operating partnership structure may result in potential conflicts of interest with limited partners other than us, if any, in our operating partnership whose interests may not be aligned with those of our stockholders.

Limited partners other than us, if any, in our operating partnership will have the right to vote on certain amendments to the operating partnership agreement, as well as on certain other matters. Persons holding such voting rights may exercise them in a manner that conflicts with the interests of our stockholders. As general partner of our operating partnership, we are obligated to act in a manner that is in the best interest of all partners of our operating partnership. Circumstances may arise in the future when the interests of other limited partners in our operating partnership may conflict with the interests of our stockholders. These conflicts may be resolved in a manner stockholders do not believe are in their best interest.

54

Table of Contents