UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File No. 001-15903
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 72-1100013 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
575 North Dairy Ashford
Suite 300
Houston, TX 77079
(Address of principal executive offices)
(281) 921-6400
(Registrants telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of October 25, 2011, 23,106,918 shares of the registrants Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.
Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
2
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
($ in thousands, except per share data)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
($ in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 167,083 | $ | 118,517 | $ | 467,582 | $ | 353,498 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
94,390 | 74,018 | 270,715 | 225,193 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
72,693 | 44,499 | 196,867 | 128,305 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
16,622 | 13,047 | 46,754 | 38,732 | ||||||||||||
Start-up costs |
127 | 102 | 127 | 621 | ||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal or impairment of assets |
(112 | ) | 193 | 1,537 | 204 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating profit |
56,056 | 31,157 | 148,449 | 88,748 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income, net |
60 | 57 | 160 | 131 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss), net |
86 | (63 | ) | (228 | ) | (50 | ) | |||||||||
Other, net |
11 | (92 | ) | (119 | ) | (308 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
157 | (98 | ) | (187 | ) | (227 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
56,213 | 31,059 | 148,262 | 88,521 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes |
19,302 | 10,884 | 51,243 | 30,620 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 36,911 | $ | 20,175 | $ | 97,019 | $ | 57,901 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.59 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 4.19 | $ | 2.51 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 1.59 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 4.19 | $ | 2.50 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other information: |
||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share (See Note 4) |
$ | 0.48 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.88 | $ | 0.76 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
($ in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine months ended
September 30, |
||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 97,019 | $ | 57,901 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
25,661 | 20,308 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
240 | | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
6,063 | 3,063 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation |
(1,270 | ) | (668 | ) | ||||
Loss on disposal or impairment of assets |
1,537 | 204 | ||||||
Foreign currency transaction loss, net |
228 | 50 | ||||||
Stock compensation expense |
3,742 | 2,819 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Trade accounts and other receivables |
(24,498 | ) | (26,809 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(35,725 | ) | (6,144 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(1,868 | ) | (557 | ) | ||||
Long-term prepaid expenses |
243 | (13 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
2,568 | 18,377 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
6,898 | 4,966 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes, net |
(3,656 | ) | (2,900 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
77,182 | 70,597 | ||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(63,148 | ) | (68,706 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of BBL Falcon Industries, Ltd. |
| 193 | ||||||
Purchase of short-term investment |
| (4,989 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(63,148 | ) | (73,502 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
Net proceeds from stock based compensation |
76 | 254 | ||||||
Dividends paid |
(14,823 | ) | (12,948 | ) | ||||
Purchase of common stock |
(7,464 | ) | (1,860 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation |
1,270 | 668 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(20,941 | ) | (13,886 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(72 | ) | 34 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(6,979 | ) | (16,757 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
46,656 | 69,557 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 39,677 | $ | 52,800 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental cash flow information |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 1 | $ | | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 48,836 | $ | 30,457 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($ in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
1. | Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of CARBO Ceramics Inc. have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of the interim periods presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or the full year. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in the annual report on Form 10-K of CARBO Ceramics Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CARBO Ceramics Inc. and its operating subsidiaries (the Company). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash equivalents approximate fair value.
Disposal or Impairment of Assets
During the three month period ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded a $890 impairment of goodwill related to the Companys geotechnical monitoring business and a $760 write-down of a 6% interest in an investment accounted for under the cost method, as a result of the sale of the business by majority shareholders.
6
2. | Earnings Per Share |
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share under the two-class method:
Three months ended
September 30, |
Nine months ended
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 36,911 | $ | 20,175 | $ | 97,019 | $ | 57,901 | ||||||||
Effect of reallocating undistributed earnings of participating securities |
(212 | ) | (123 | ) | (562 | ) | (361 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income available under the two-class method |
$ | 36,699 | $ | 20,052 | $ | 96,457 | $ | 57,540 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per share weighted-average shares |
23,026,741 | 22,966,617 | 23,022,836 | 22,968,492 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Employee stock options (See Note 6) |
1,351 | 2,936 | 1,333 | 4,055 | ||||||||||||
Deferred stock awards (See Note 6) |
| 4,039 | | 4,028 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Dilutive potential common shares |
1,351 | 6,975 | 1,333 | 8,083 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings per share adjusted weighted-average shares |
23,028,092 | 22,973,592 | 23,024,169 | 22,976,575 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 1.59 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 4.19 | $ | 2.51 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 1.59 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 4.19 | $ | 2.50 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. | Common Stock Repurchase Program |
On August 28, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to two million shares of the Companys Common Stock. Shares are effectively retired at the time of purchase. During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the Company repurchased and retired 55,000 shares at an aggregate price of $6,649. As of September 30, 2011, the Company has repurchased and retired 1,817,576 shares at an aggregate price of $72,574.
4. | Dividends Paid |
On July 19, 2011, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.24 per common share payable to shareholders of record on August 1, 2011. The dividend was paid on August 15, 2011. On September 20, 2011, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.24 per common share payable to shareholders of record on November 1, 2011. This dividend is payable on November 15, 2011 and is presented in Current Liabilities at September 30, 2011.
5. | Comprehensive Income |
The following table sets forth the components of comprehensive income:
Three months ended
September 30, |
Nine months ended
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 36,911 | $ | 20,175 | $ | 97,019 | $ | 57,901 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(4,202 | ) | 2,014 | 239 | 251 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 32,709 | $ | 22,189 | $ | 97,258 | $ | 58,152 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The foreign currency translation adjustment for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is net of deferred income tax benefit of $2,029 and none, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the foreign currency translation adjustment is net of deferred income tax benefit of $1,219 and none, respectively.
7
6. | Stock Based Compensation |
The CARBO Ceramics Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Omnibus Incentive Plan), which replaced the previously expired restricted stock and stock option plans, provides for granting of cash-based awards, stock options (both non-qualified and incentive) and other equity-based awards (including stock appreciation rights, phantom stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, deferred share units or share-denominated performance units) to employees and non-employee directors. The amount paid under the Omnibus Incentive Plan to any single participant in any calendar year with respect to any cash-based award shall not exceed $2,000. Awards may be granted with respect to a number of shares of the Companys Common Stock that in the aggregate does not exceed 750,000 shares prior to the fifth anniversary of its effective date, plus (i) the number of shares that are forfeited, cancelled or returned, and (ii) the number of shares that are withheld from the participants to satisfy an option exercise price or minimum statutory tax withholding obligations. No more than 50,000 shares may be granted to any single participant in any calendar year. Equity-based awards may be subject to performance-based and/or service-based conditions. With respect to stock options and stock appreciation rights granted, the exercise price shall not be less than the market value of the underlying Common Stock on the date of grant. The maximum term of an option is ten years. Restricted stock awards granted generally vest (i.e., transfer and forfeiture restrictions on these shares are lifted) proportionately on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, but subject to certain limitations, awards may specify other vesting periods. As of September 30, 2011, 615,186 shares were available for issuance under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. Although the Companys previous restricted stock and stock option plans have expired, outstanding options and unvested shares granted under these plans remain outstanding in accordance with their terms.
The Company also had a Director Deferred Fee Plan (the Plan), which terminated on January 19, 2010, that permitted non-employee directors of the Company to defer receipt of cash compensation for service as a director and to receive those fees in the form of the Companys Common Stock on a specified later date that was on or after the directors retirement from the Board of Directors. In January 2011, a total of 4,058 shares were issued in full payment of $171 of deferred fees remaining under the Plan to electing directors.
A summary of stock option activity and related information for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is presented below:
Options |
Weighted-
Average Exercise Price |
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value |
||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 |
5,900 | $ | 22.04 | |||||||||
Granted |
| | ||||||||||
Exercised |
(3,475 | ) | $ | 21.83 | ||||||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2011 |
2,425 | $ | 22.35 | $ | 194 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2011 |
2,425 | $ | 22.35 | $ | 194 | |||||||
|
|
As of September 30, 2011, all compensation cost related to stock options granted under the expired stock option plans has been recognized. The weighted-average remaining contractual term of options outstanding at September 30, 2011 was 1 year. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $346.
A summary of restricted stock activity and related information for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is presented below:
Shares |
Weighted-
Average Grant-Date Fair Value |
|||||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2011 |
134,276 | $ | 51.20 | |||||
Granted |
54,740 | $ | 104.07 | |||||
Vested |
(53,321 | ) | $ | 47.01 | ||||
Forfeited |
(2,006 | ) | $ | 75.91 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Nonvested at September 30, 2011 |
133,689 | $ | 74.15 | |||||
|
|
8
As of September 30, 2011, there was $5,720 of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to restricted shares granted under the restricted stock plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $2,507.
The Company also had an International Long-Term Incentive Plan that provided for granting units of stock appreciation rights (SARs) or phantom shares to key international employees. This plan was replaced by the Omnibus Incentive Plan. One-third of the units subject to an award vests and ceases to be forfeitable on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date. Participants awarded units of SARs have the right to receive an amount, in cash, equal to the excess of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock as of the vesting date, or in some cases on a later exercise date chosen by the participant, over the exercise price. Participants awarded units of phantom shares are entitled to a lump sum cash payment equal to the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the vesting date. In no event will Common Stock of the Company be issued under either plan with regard to outstanding SARs or phantom shares. As of September 30, 2011, there were 21,565 units of phantom shares granted under the plans, of which 12,487 have vested and 790 have been forfeited, with a total value of $850, the vested portion of which is recorded as a liability within Other Accrued Expenses.
7. | Bank Borrowings |
The Company has an unsecured revolving credit agreement with Wells Fargo N.A. Under the terms of the agreement, dated January 29, 2010, the Company can borrow up to $10,000. The Company has the option of choosing either the banks fluctuating Base Rate or LIBOR Fixed Rate, plus an Applicable Margin, all as defined in the credit agreement. The terms of the credit agreement provide for certain affirmative and negative covenants and require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. Commitment fees are payable quarterly at the annual rate of 0.50% of the unused line of credit.
8. | Foreign Currencies |
As of September 30, 2011, the Companys net investment that is subject to foreign currency fluctuations totaled $85,424 and the Company has recorded cumulative foreign currency translation loss of $3,875, net of deferred income tax benefit. This cumulative translation loss is included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.
9. | New Accounting Pronouncements |
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued authoritative guidance on disclosure of supplementary pro forma information for business combinations. The new guidance requires that pro forma financial information should be prepared as if the business combination occurred as of the beginning of the prior annual period. The guidance is effective for the Company for business combinations with acquisition dates occurring in and from the first quarter of fiscal 2012.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (ASC Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, (ASU 2011-05) which amends current comprehensive income guidance. This accounting update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders equity. Instead, the Company must report comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income which contains two sections, net income and other comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for public companies during the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 will not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as it only requires a change in the format of the current presentation.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (ASC Topic 350), (ASU 2011-08). This accounting update allows entities to perform a qualitative assessment on goodwill impairment to determine whether it is more likely than not (defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. This guidance is effective for goodwill impairment test performed in interim and annual periods for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
9
10. | Legal Proceedings |
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
On August 4, 2011, CARBO Ceramics Inc. was named as a defendant in a civil lawsuit filed by C-E Minerals, Inc. (C-E) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. C-E has alleged that a mutual non-competition provision contained in a Raw Material Requirements Agreement between C-E and CARBO Ceramics Inc., dated June 1, 2003, is invalid under federal antitrust law and applicable state law. The covenant generally prohibits C-E from engaging in the manufacture or sale of ceramic proppant, and prohibits the Company from engaging in the business of selling calcined clay through the end of 2013 (three years after the termination date of the agreement). C-E is seeking a declaratory judgment that the covenant is invalid, along with a preliminary and permanent injunction that would prevent the enforcement of the covenant. C-E is also seeking to recover its attorneys fees from the Company. C-E subsequently amended its complaint on September 15, 2011 to further allege that the Company has certain monopoly power and has asked for declaratory and injunctive relief that would prevent the Company from enforcing certain damages provisions in its sales contracts. The Company believes that C-Es allegations are without merit and is vigorously defending the lawsuit. In addition, the Company has filed a counter-claim against C-E seeking injunctive relief and damages in connection with sales of ceramic proppant by C-E and its affiliates.
10
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Business
The Company generates revenue primarily through the sale of products and services to the oil and natural gas industry. The Companys principal business consists of manufacturing and selling ceramic proppant for use primarily in the hydraulic fracturing of oil and natural gas wells. The Company recently commenced the sale of resin-coated sand, which is an alternative to both ceramic proppant and raw frac sand, in order to broaden its proppant suite of products. The Company also provides the industrys most popular fracture simulation software FracPro ® , as well as fracture design and consulting services. In addition, the Company provides a broad range of technologies for spill prevention, containment and countermeasures, along with geotechnical monitoring.
Critical Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, which require the Company to make estimates and assumptions (see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010). The Company believes that some of its accounting policies involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity than others. As of December 31, 2010, critical accounting policies for the Company included revenue recognition, estimating the recoverability of accounts receivable, inventory valuation, accounting for income taxes and accounting for long-lived assets. These critical accounting policies are discussed more fully in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no changes in the Companys evaluation of its critical accounting policies since December 31, 2010.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
Revenues. Revenues of $167.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 increased 41% compared to $118.5 million in revenues for the same period in 2010. The increase is mainly attributed to a 30% increase in proppant sales volume and an increase in the average proppant selling price as a result of price increases. Worldwide proppant sales volume totaled 432 million pounds for the third quarter of 2011 compared to 332 million pounds for the third quarter of 2010. North American (defined as Canada and the U.S.) sales volume increased by 31% while International (excluding Canada) sales volume increased 29%. North American demand was driven by an increase in the drilling rig count in the U.S. and Canada as well as continued acceptance of the Companys products in unconventional resource plays, including shale formations. Additional production capacity from the completion of the third and fourth production lines at the Companys Toomsboro, Georgia production facility enabled the Company to increase sales volumes. The third production line was completed during the fourth quarter of 2010 and the fourth production line was completed in the latter part of the third quarter of 2011. Production of CARBO Bond ® resin-coated sand and purchases of ceramic proppant that meets standards published by the American Petroleum Institute (API) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and is manufactured on an outsourced basis (collectively, Other Proppants), also contributed toward improved ability to meet customer demand. Other Proppants represented 34 million pounds of the Companys worldwide sales volumes in the third quarter of 2011, as compared to 26 million pounds in the third quarter of 2010. The average selling price per pound of all proppant, including both Company-produced proppant and Other Proppant, was $0.358 during the third quarter of 2011 compared to $0.327 for the same period in 2010.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the third quarter of 2011 was $72.7 million, or 44% of revenues, compared to $44.5 million, or 38% of revenues, for the third quarter of 2010. The increase in gross profit, as well as gross profit as a percentage of revenues, were primarily the result of higher proppant sales volumes, an increase in the average proppant selling price, a change in product mix, and greater contribution from the Companys other business units.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) and Other Operating Expenses. SG&A expenses totaled $16.6 million for the third quarter of 2011 compared to $13.0 million for the same period in 2010. As a percentage of revenues, SG&A expenses decreased to 9.9% compared to 11.0% for the third quarter of 2010. The increase in
11
SG&A expenses primarily resulted from higher marketing, research and development, and administrative spending associated with supporting revenue growth. Other operating expenses include start-up costs, which in 2010 and 2011 related to the start-up of the third and fourth production lines, respectively, at the Companys Toomsboro, Georgia facility, and gains and losses associated with disposals or impairment of assets.
Income Tax Expense . Income tax expense was $19.3 million, or 34.3% of pretax income, for the third quarter of 2011 compared to $10.9 million, or 35.0% of pretax income, for the same period last year. The $8.4 million increase is primarily due to higher pre-tax income, partially offset by a lower effective tax rate primarily associated with the final preparation and filing of the Companys prior year tax returns.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
Revenues . Revenues of $467.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased 32% compared to $353.5 million in revenues for the same period in 2010. Revenues increased primarily due to a 20% increase in proppant sales volume, an increase in the average proppant selling price as a result of price increases and an increase in revenues of Falcon Technologies. Worldwide proppant sales volume totaled 1.218 billion pounds in the first nine months of 2011 compared to 1.015 billion pounds for the same period in 2010. North American (defined as Canada and the U.S.) sales volume increased 22% and International (excluding Canada) sales volume increased 8%. North American demand was driven primarily by an increase in the drilling rig count in the U.S. and Canada as well as continued acceptance of the Companys products in unconventional resource plays, including shale formations. Additional production capacity from the completion of the third and fourth production lines at the Companys Toomsboro, Georgia production facility in 2010 and 2011, respectively, enabled the Company to increase sales volumes. Completion of the resin coating line at the Companys New Iberia, Louisiana production facility during the second quarter of 2010 and the purchase of ceramic proppant that meets API and ISO standards and is manufactured on an outsourced basis also contributed toward improved ability to meet customer demand. Other Proppants represented 80 million pounds of the Companys worldwide sales volumes for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to 51 million pounds in the same period in 2010. The average selling price per pound of all proppant, including both Company-produced proppant and Other Proppant, was $0.355 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $0.320 for the same period in 2010.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $196.9 million, or 42% of revenues, compared to $128.3 million, or 36% of revenues, for the same period in 2010. The increase in gross profit, as well as gross profit as a percentage of revenues, were primarily the result of higher proppant sales volume, an increase in the average proppant selling price, a change in product mix, and greater contribution from the Companys other business units.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) and Other Operating Expenses. SG&A expenses totaled $46.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $38.7 million for the same period in 2010. As a percentage of revenues, SG&A expenses decreased to 10.0% compared to 11.0% for the same nine-month period in 2010. The increase in SG&A expenses primarily resulted from higher marketing, research and development, and administrative spending associated with supporting revenue growth. Other operating expenses consist of start-up costs and loss on disposals or impairment of assets. Start-up costs in 2011 related to costs associated with the start-up of the fourth production line at the Companys Toomsboro, Georgia facility. Start-up costs in 2010 related to the start-up of the resin-coating plant at the New Iberia, Louisiana facility and the start-up of the third production line at the Companys Toomsboro, Georgia facility. Loss on disposal or impairment of assets of $1.5 million in 2011 consists primarily of a $0.9 million impairment of goodwill related to the Companys geotechnical monitoring business and a $0.8 million write-down of a 6% interest in an investment accounted for under the cost method as a result of the sale of the business by majority shareholders.
Income Tax Expense . Income tax expense was $51.2 million, or 34.6% of pretax income, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $30.6 million, or 34.6% of pretax income for the same period last year. The $20.6 million increase is primarily due to higher pre-tax income.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2011, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $39.7 million compared to cash and cash equivalents of $46.7 million at December 31, 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company generated $77.2 million of cash from operating activities, $1.3 million from excess tax benefits relating to stock based compensation and received $0.1 million proceeds from exercises of stock options. Uses of cash included $63.2 million of capital spending, $14.8 million of cash dividends, $7.5 million for the repurchase of the Companys common stock and $0.1 million for the effect of exchange rate changes on cash.
12
The Company believes its operating results for the remainder of the year will continue to be influenced by the level of oil and natural gas drilling in North America. While natural gas prices remain low, the continuing shift in oilfield activity by the Companys clients to oily, liquids-rich plays will likely keep industry activity at high levels for the remainder of the year. Accordingly, the Company believes near-term proppant sales volumes will remain healthy, tempered by typical fourth quarter seasonality. The Company expects to support demand increases with additions to its production capacity. The recently completed fourth production line at its Toomsboro, Georgia facility increases ceramic proppant production capacity by 250 million pounds annually and brings the Companys total ceramic proppant capacity to 1.75 billion pounds per year. With respect to resin coating capacity expansion, the second production line in New Iberia, Louisiana remains on schedule for the completion near the end of the fourth quarter of 2011. Once completed, this line will increase the Companys annual resin coating capacity to 350 million pounds. A 600 million pound per year resin coating facility under construction in Marshfield, Wisconsin is on schedule for completion before the end of 2012. Additionally, the Company has completed the due diligence process for a new ceramic proppant manufacturing site and has moved forward with the purchase of a site in Georgia. This plant is targeted with initial production capacity of up to 500 million pounds annually and could commence production before the end of 2013. During periods of high demand, and at the request of its customers, the Company may also continue to engage in the sale of ceramic proppant that meets API/ISO standards manufactured on an outsourced basis, and during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 the majority of the increase in finished goods inventory is attributable to this type of proppant.
Subject to the Companys financial condition, the amount of funds generated from operations and the level of capital expenditures, the Companys current intention is to continue to pay quarterly dividends to holders of its common stock. On September 20, 2011, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.24 per common share, or $5.5 million in the aggregate, to shareholders of record on November 1, 2011. That dividend is payable on November 15, 2011. The Company estimates its total capital expenditures for the remainder of 2011 will be between $40 million and $50 million. Capital expenditures for the remainder of 2011 are expected to include costs associated with completion of the second resin coating line at the Companys New Iberia facility and further resin coating expansion at the Companys recently acquired Marshfield, Wisconsin location.
The Company maintains an unsecured line of credit of $10.0 million with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. As of September 30, 2011, there was no outstanding debt under the credit agreement. The Company anticipates that cash on hand, cash provided by operating activities and funds available under its line of credit will be sufficient to meet planned operating expenses, tax obligations, capital expenditures and other cash needs for the next 12 months. The Company also believes that it could acquire additional debt financing, if needed. Based on these assumptions, the Company believes that its fixed costs could be met even with a moderate decrease in demand for the Companys products.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, 2011.
Forward-Looking Information
The statements in this Form 10-Q that are not historical statements, including statements regarding our future financial and operating performance and liquidity and capital resources, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. All forward-looking statements are based on managements current expectations and estimates, which involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Among these factors are:
|
changes in overall economic conditions, |
|
changes in the cost of raw materials and natural gas used in manufacturing our products, |
|
changes in demand and prices charged for our products, |
|
changes in the demand for, or price of, oil and natural gas, |
|
risks of increased competition, |
|
technological, manufacturing and product development risks, |
|
loss of key customers, |
13
|
changes in foreign and domestic government regulations, including environmental restrictions on operations and regulation of hydraulic fracturing, |
|
changes in foreign and domestic political and legislative risks, |
|
the risks of war and international and domestic terrorism, |
|
risks associated with foreign operations and foreign currency exchange rates and controls, and |
|
weather-related risks and other risks and uncertainties. |
Additional factors that could affect our future results or events are described from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). See in particular our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 under the caption Risk Factors and similar disclosures in subsequently filed reports with the SEC. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as required by law.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The Companys major market risk exposure is to foreign currency fluctuations that could impact its investments in China and Russia. As of September 30, 2011, the Companys net investment that is subject to foreign currency fluctuations totaled $85.4 million and the Company has recorded cumulative foreign currency translation loss of $3.9 million, net of deferred income tax benefit. This cumulative translation loss is included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. From time to time, the Company may enter into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. There were no such foreign exchange contracts outstanding at September 30, 2011.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
(a) | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of September 30, 2011, management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurances of achieving their control objectives. Based upon and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
( b) | Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, those controls.
14
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
On August 4, 2011, CARBO Ceramics Inc. was named as a defendant in a civil lawsuit filed by C-E Minerals, Inc. (C-E) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. C-E has alleged that a mutual non-competition provision contained in a Raw Material Requirements Agreement between C-E and CARBO Ceramics Inc., dated June 1, 2003, is invalid under federal antitrust law and applicable state law. The covenant generally prohibits C-E from engaging in the manufacture or sale of ceramic proppant, and prohibits the Company from engaging in the business of selling calcined clay through the end of 2013 (three years after the termination date of the agreement). C-E is seeking a declaratory judgment that the covenant is invalid, along with a preliminary and permanent injunction that would prevent the enforcement of the covenant. C-E is also seeking to recover its attorneys fees from the Company. C-E subsequently amended its complaint on September 15, 2011 to further allege that the Company has certain monopoly power and has asked for declaratory and injunctive relief that would prevent the Company from enforcing certain damages provisions in its sales contracts. The Company believes that C-Es allegations are without merit and is vigorously defending the lawsuit. In addition, the Company has filed a counter-claim against C-E seeking injunctive relief and damages in connection with sales of ceramic proppant by C-E and its affiliates.
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
There have been no material changes to the risk factors discussed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
The following table provides information about the Companys repurchases of Common Stock during the quarter ended September 30, 2011:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period |
Total Number
of Shares Purchased |
Average
Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan(2) |
Maximum
Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plan(1) |
||||||||||||
07/01/11 to 07/31/11 |
| $ | | | 237,424 | |||||||||||
08/01/11 to 08/31/11 |
| $ | | | 237,424 | |||||||||||
09/01/11 to 09/30/11 |
55,000 | $ | 120.89 | 55,000 | 182,424 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
55,000 | 55,000 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | On August 28, 2008, the Company announced the authorization by its Board of Directors for the repurchase of up to two million shares of its Common Stock. |
(2) | Selected repurchases were made with an agent under a Written Plan for the Repurchase of Securities that complies with the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act (the 10b5-1 Agreement). The agent repurchased a number of shares of our common stock determined under the terms of the 10b5-1 Agreement each trading day based on the trading price of the stock on that day. Shares were repurchased by the agent at the prevailing market prices, in open market transactions which complied with Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act. |
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
Not applicable
ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE |
Our U.S. manufacturing facilities process mined minerals, and therefore are viewed as mine operations subject to regulation by the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. Information concerning mine safety violations or other
15
regulatory matters required by section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the recently proposed Item 106 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.106) is included in Exhibit 99.1 to this quarterly report.
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION |
Not applicable
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:
10.1 | Side letter to the Proppant Supply Agreement, dated August 26, 2011, by and between CARBO Ceramics Inc. and Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. |
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Gary A. Kolstad. |
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Ernesto Bautista III. |
32 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
99.1 | Mine Safety Disclosure |
101 | The following financial information from the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; and (iv) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
16
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CARBO CERAMICS INC. |
/s/ Gary A. Kolstad |
Gary A. Kolstad |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
/s/ Ernesto Bautista III |
Ernesto Bautista III |
Chief Financial Officer |
Date: October 31, 2011
17
EXHIBIT |
DESCRIPTION |
|
10.1 | Side letter to the Proppant Supply Agreement, dated August 26, 2011, by and between CARBO Ceramics Inc. and Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | |
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Gary A. Kolstad. | |
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Ernesto Bautista III. | |
32 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
99.1 | Mine Safety Disclosure | |
101 | The following financial information from the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; and (iv) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
18
Exhibit 10.1
August 26, 2011
Roch Romanson
Sr. Category Manager Proppants
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
10200 Bellaire Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77072
Re: Amendment to Proppant Supply Agreement
Dear Mr. Romanson:
This letter agreement (this Letter Agreement ) is delivered to amend that certain Proppant Supply Agreement, as amended (the Agreement ), dated August 28, 2008, by and between CARBO Ceramics Inc., a Delaware corporation ( Seller ), and Halliburton Energy Services, Inc, a Delaware corporation ( Buyer ), in accordance with Section 11.3 of the Agreement. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.
Sellers Terms of Conditions of Sale attached as Exhibit B to the Agreement are hereby replaced with the Terms and Conditions of Sale attached hereto as Attachment 1 .
Seller and Buyer agree that the provisions of this Letter Agreement shall modify the Agreement and shall constitute a part of the Agreement as though fully set forth therein. This Letter Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware. This Letter Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please so indicate by signing and returning a copy of this Letter Agreement to Seller.
Sincerely, | ||
CARBO Ceramics Inc. | ||
By: |
/s/ Gary Kolstad |
|
Name: |
Gary Kolstad | |
Title: |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
By: |
/s/ Tim C. Moeller |
|
Name: |
Tim C. Moeller | |
Title: |
VP Procurement & Materials |
ATTACHMENT 1
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE
1 . AGREEMENT OF SALE, ACCEPTANCE : Any acceptance contained herein is expressly made conditional on Buyers assent to any terms contained herein that are additional to or different from those proposed by Buyer in its purchase order and, hence, any terms and provisions Buyers purchase order which are inconsistent with the terms and conditions hereof shall not be binding on the Seller. Unless Buyer shall notify Seller in writing to, the contrary as soon as practicable after receipt hereof, acceptance of the terms and conditions hereof by Buyer shall be deemed made and, in the absence of such notification, the sale and shipment by the Seller of the goods covered hereby shall be conclusively deemed to be subject to the terms and conditions hereof.
2. ENTIRE CONTRACT : This contract constitutes the final and entire agreement between Seller and Buyer and any prior or contemporaneous understandings or agreements, oral or written, are merged herein.
3. PRICES : The price to be paid by Buyer shall be the price in effect at the date of actual delivery of the goods unless otherwise specified in writing by Seller.
4. TAXES: The price of the goods does not include sales, use, excise, ad valorem, property or other taxes now or hereafter imposed, directly or indirectly, by any governmental authority or agency with respect to the manufacture, production, sale, delivery, consumption or use of the goods covered by this contract. Buyer shall pay such taxes directly or reimburse Seller for any such taxes which it may be required to pay.
5. PAYMENT : The specific terms of payment are as specified in writing by Seller. If the Buyer shall fail to make any payments in accordance with the terms and provisions hereof, the Seller, in addition to its other rights and remedies, but not in limitation thereof, may, at its option, defer shipments or deliveries hereunder, or under any other contract with the Buyer, except upon receipt of satisfactory security or of cash before shipment.
6. SHIPMENT; RISK OF LOSS; TITLE : The goods shall be shipped to a site mutually agreed upon by Buyer and Seller, unless otherwise specified in writing by Seller. Risks of loss pass to Buyer upon delivery to the carrier. Title shall pass to Buyer on delivery of the goods to Buyer.
7 . DELIVERIES : The date of delivery provided herein is an approximation based on Sellers best judgment and prompt receipt from the Buyer of all necessary data regarding the goods. Unless otherwise expressly stated, Seller shall have the right to deliver all of the goods at one time or in portions from time to time within the time of delivery herein provided. The delivery of nonconforming goods, or a default of any nature, in relation to one or more installments of this contract shall not substantially impair the value of this contract as a whole and shall not constitute a total breach of the contract as a whole,.
8. DELAYS IN DELIVERIES : Seller shall, be excused for delay in delivery, may suspend performance and shall under no circumstances be responsible for failure to fill any order or orders when due to acts of God or of the public enemy: fires, floods, riots, strikes, freight embargoes or transportation delays, inability to secure fuel, material supplies, or power on account of general market shortages thereof, any existing or future laws, or acts of the Federal or of any State Government (including superficially but not exclusively any orders, rules or regulations issued by any official or agency of any such government) affecting the conduct of Sellers business, any cause beyond Sellers reasonable control.
9. WARRANTY : Seller warrants that the goods manufactured by the Seller when shipped are free from defects in materials and workmanship, provided, however, Seller shall have no obligation or liability under this warranty unless it shall have received prompt written notice specifying such defect no later than one (1) year from the date of shipment. In the event of defects developing within that period under normal and proper use, Buyer agrees that its sole and exclusive remedy shall require only that the Seller, at its option, repair, modify or replace the non-conforming goods f.o.b. Sellers plant or accept the return of the non-conforming goods and refund the purchase price or part thereof, giving effect to the use or value received by Buyer. No goods shall be returned to Seller without Sellers prior written consent. In no event will Seller be liable for any damages, including consequential damages, resulting from the use of the product.
THE WARRANTY SPECIFIED IN THIS PARAGRAPH IS THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE WARRANTY RELATING TO THE GOODS AND IS IN SUBSTITUTION FOR AND IN LIEU OF ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING THE WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY AND THE WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AS WELL AS ANY WARRANTY ARISING FROM COURSE OF DEALING, PERFORMANCE OR USAGE OF TRADE.
10. LAWS, CODES, REGULATIONS, SAFETY DEVICES : Compliance with laws, codes and regulations relating to the goods and their uses is the sole responsibility of Buyer, and Seller makes no warranty or representation with respect thereto. Buyer assumes the
responsibility for providing and installing any and all devices for protection, of safety, health and the environment and shall indemnify and hold harmless Seller against all expense, loss, or damage which Seller may incur or sustain as a result of Buyers failure to do so, including associated legal costs and expenses. Buyer will not export or re-export the goods from the place and country of destination listed on Buyers initial order form without Sellers express prior and express written permission.
11. PATENTS : Seller shall, at its own expense, assume the defense of any claim, suit or other proceeding brought against Buyer upon a claim that the goods furnished under this contract constitutes an infringement of any patent of the United States. Buyer agrees to cooperate in the defense of any such proceeding and to provide information, assistance and authority necessary, therefor. Should the goods in such suit be held to constitute infringement and the use of the goods enjoined, the Seller shall, at its own expense and at its option, procure for the Buyer the right to continue using such goods, replace them with substantially equivalent goods, modify them so they become non-infringing or refund the applicable portion of Buyers purchase price. Such actions shall constitute Sellers sole and exclusive obligation and liability with respect to infringement of intellectual property rights.
Buyer shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify Seller against all judgments, decrees, costs and expenses arising out of any action against Seller or its suppliers based on a claim that the manufacture or sale of goods hereunder constitutes infringement of any United States letters patent, if such goods were manufactured pursuant to Buyers proprietary designs, specifications and/or formulae and were not normally offered for sale by Seller, provided, however, Seller shall give prompt written notice of the claim or action and Seller shall give Buyer authority, information and assistance at Buyers expense.
12. LIABILITY : In no event shall Sellers obligation and liability under this contract extend to indirect, punitive, special, incidental or consequential damages or losses Buyer may suffer or incur in connection therewith, such as but not limited to loss of revenue or profits, damages or losses as a result of Buyers inability to operate, or shut down of its plant or operations, loss of use of the goods or associated goods or cost of substitute goods, facilities or services, inability to fulfill contracts with third parties, injury to good will, claims of customers and the like, nor shall it extend to damages or losses Buyer may suffer or incur as a result of claims, suits or other proceedings made or instituted against Buyer by third parties, whether public or private in nature.
13. BUYERS DEFAULT; TERMINATION : Buyer shall be liable to Seller for all damages or losses, including loss of reasonable profits, and for costs and expenses, including attorneys fees, sustained by Seller and arising from Buyers default under, or breach of, any of the terms and conditions of this contract. In the event of any such default or breach, Seller may, without any obligation or liability to Buyer, terminate this contract forthwith by written notice to Buyer and such action by Seller shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy with respect to such default or breach.
14. ASSIGNMENT: No right or interest in this contract shall be assigned by Buyer without prior written agreement by the Seller. No delegation of any obligation owed, or the performance of any obligation by the Buyer shall be made without prior written agreement by the Seller.
15. LAW GOVERNING : The interpretation and performance of this contract shall be in accordance with and shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Texas, without reference to the conflict of laws provisions thereof, and specifically excludes the U.N. Convention on Contracts for International Sale of Goods.
16. MODIFICATIONS; WAIVER : No waiver, alteration or modification of any of the provisions hereof shall be binding on the Seller unless made in writing and agreed to by a duly authorized official of the Seller. No waiver by the Seller of any one or more defaults by the Buyer in the performance of any provisions of this contract shall operate or be construed as a waiver of any future default or defaults, whether of a like or of a different character.
17. ATTORNEYS FEES : If suit or action is filed by Seller to enforce the provisions hereof or otherwise with respect to the subject matter of this contract, the Seller, in addition to its other rights and remedies, but not in limitation thereof, shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys fees as fixed by the trial court, and if any appeal is taken from the decision of the trial court, reasonable attorneys fees as fixed by the appellate court.
18. IMPORT AND EXPORT COMPLIANCE . Seller agrees that, in performance under this Agreement, it is solely responsible for its required compliance with any applicable trade restriction and export laws and regulations of the United States and the jurisdiction in which Sellers shipment of goods originates. When the goods (or part thereof) are subject to export control laws and regulations imposed by the United States or a government where Sellers shipment originates, Seller will upon request provide Buyer with applicable Export Commodity Classification Numbers and harmonized Tariff Schedule Numbers per goods for export including certificates of manufacture in accordance with the origin rules imposed by such governmental authority. If said Goods are eligible for preferential tax or tariff treatment (such as free trade or international agreement), Seller will use reasonable efforts to provide Buyer with the documentation required to participate in said treatment to the extent such documentation is in Sellers possession and can be generated or provided by Sellers existing infrastructure systems and administrative staff.
19. FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT . Contractor shall comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act including the requirement to pay a statutory minimum wage to its employees. Pursuant to the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act, Contractor shall verify that each of its employees is authorized to work in the United States and shall require signed I-9 forms from each employee as well as proof of identity and authorization to work documents. Such I-9 forms will be maintained by Contractor as required by law and will be available for inspection by the Company upon the Companys written request to inspect such records.
Exhibit 31.1
Quarterly Certification
As required by Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
I, Gary A. Kolstad, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CARBO Ceramics Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: |
October 31, 2011 | |||
/s/ Gary A. Kolstad |
||||
Gary A. Kolstad |
||||
President & CEO |
Exhibit 31.2
Quarterly Certification
As required by Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
I, Ernesto Bautista III, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CARBO Ceramics Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: |
October 31, 2011 | |||
/s/ Ernesto Bautista III |
||||
Ernesto Bautista III | ||||
Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32
Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of CARBO Ceramics Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
Dated: |
October 31, 2011 | |||
/s/ Gary A. Kolstad |
||||
Name: |
Gary A. Kolstad |
|||
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer |
|||
Dated: |
October 31, 2011 | |||
/s/ Ernesto Bautista III |
||||
Name: |
Ernesto Bautista III |
|||
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 99.1
Mine Safety Disclosure
To Date through September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
(Whole dollars)
Operation (1) |
Section
104* Citations |
Section
104(b) Orders |
104(d)
Citations and Orders |
Section
110(b)(2) Violations |
Section
107(a) Orders |
Proposed
MSHA** Assessments |
Fatalities |
Pending
Legal*** Actions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Iberia, LA |
0 | | | | | $ | 16,401.00 | | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Eufaula, AL |
2 | | | | | 0.00 | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
McIntyre, GA |
7 | | | | | 106,594.00 | | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Toomsboro, GA |
2 | | | | | 0.00 | | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
11 | | | | | $ | 122,995.00 | | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Represents citations received during the three months ended September 30, 2011 |
** | Represents all outstanding MSHA citations under contest as of September 30, 2011 |
*** | Represents number of outstanding MSHA citations with pending legal action as of September 30, 2011 |