NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted, except per share data)

Note 1: Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year classifications.

Operating results for the nine-month period ended January 31, 2013, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending April 30, 2013. For further information, reference is made to the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2012.

Note 2: Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income , which eliminated the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity and required the presentation of net income and other comprehensive income to be in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 does not change the components that are recognized in net income or other comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 was effective May 1, 2012, for the Company and the Company elected to present net income and other comprehensive income in two separate but consecutive statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. ASU 2013-02 requires reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income be presented on the financial statements or in a note to the financial statements. ASU 2013-02 will be effective May 1, 2013, for the Company and will be applied prospectively. The Company anticipates the adoption of ASU 2013-02 will not impact the financial statements, but will expand the disclosures related to amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU 2011-11 requires the disclosure of both gross and net information about financial instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the consolidated balance sheet. In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, Scope Clarification of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities , which limits the scope of ASU 2011-11 to derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending transactions. ASU 2011-11, as clarified by ASU 2013-01, will be effective May 1, 2013, for the Company and will require retrospective application. The Company anticipates the adoption of 2011-11, as clarified by ASU 2013-01, will not impact the financial statements, but may expand the disclosures related to financial instruments.

The FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment , and ASU 2012-02, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment , in September 2011 and July 2012, respectively . ASU 2011-08 and ASU 2012-02 simplify the guidance for testing impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets by allowing the Company the option to perform a qualitative test to assess the likelihood that the estimated fair value is less than the carrying amount. ASU 2011-08 will be effective for the Company’s February 1, 2013 annual impairment test. ASU 2012-02 will be effective for the Company’s February 1, 2014 annual impairment test, but early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 and ASU 2012-02 will not change the process for the February 1, 2013 impairment test and will not impact the financial statements or related disclosures.

6

Note 3: Acquisitions

On January 3, 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of a majority of the North American foodservice coffee and hot beverage business of Sara Lee Corporation (“Sara Lee foodservice business”), including a liquid coffee manufacturing facility in Suffolk, Virginia, for $420.6 million in an all-cash transaction. Utilizing proceeds from the 3.50 percent Notes issued in October 2011, the Company paid Sara Lee Corporation, recently renamed The Hillshire Brands Company, $375.6 million, net of a working capital adjustment, and will pay an additional $50.0 million in declining installments over the next 10 years to a subsidiary of D.E Master Blenders 1753 N.V., an independent public company recently separated from The Hillshire Brands Company. The additional $50.0 million obligation was included in other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and recorded at a present value of $45.0 million as of the date of acquisition. During the nine months ended January 31, 2013, $10.0 million was paid and included in other – net financing on the Condensed Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows.

Total one-time costs related to the acquisition are estimated to be approximately $28.0 million, consisting primarily of transition services provided by Sara Lee Corporation and employee separation and relocation costs, nearly all of which are cash related. The Company has incurred one-time costs of $24.2 million through January 31, 2013, directly related to the merger and integration of the acquired business, and the charges were reported in other restructuring and merger and integration costs in the Condensed Statements of Consolidated Income. The Company expects the remainder of the costs to be incurred through fiscal 2014.

The acquisition included the market-leading liquid coffee concentrate business sold under the licensed Douwe Egberts ^® brand, along with a variety of roast and ground coffee, cappuccino, tea, and cocoa products, sold through foodservice channels in North America. Liquid coffee concentrate adds a unique, high-quality, and technology-driven form of coffee to the Company’s existing foodservice product offering.

During the second quarter of 2013, the Company announced its plan to exit the private label roast and ground coffee portion of the acquired Sara Lee foodservice business representing approximately $75.0 to $100.0 million in annual net sales. While the Company anticipates a future reduction in net sales, the exit is expected to have a favorable impact on profit margins within the International, Foodservice, and Natural Foods segment. One-time costs associated with the exit are not expected to be significant and primarily include employee separation costs. Although the exit began in the third quarter, it is not expected to have a material impact on 2013 results. The Company expects to complete the exit during fiscal 2014. The net sales reduction in fiscal 2014 is expected to be approximately $50.0 million as exits will occur throughout the first half of the fiscal year.

7

The purchase price was allocated to the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their fair values at the date of acquisition. The Company determined the estimated fair values based on independent appraisals, discounted cash flow analyses, and estimates made by management. The purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired, and, as such, the excess was allocated to goodwill. The amount allocated to goodwill was primarily attributable to anticipated synergies and market expansion. The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date.

Of the total goodwill assigned to the International, Foodservice, and Natural Foods segment, $136.0 million is deductible for tax purposes.

The purchase price allocated to the identifiable intangible assets acquired is as follows:

On May 16, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of the coffee brands and business operations of Rowland Coffee Roasters, Inc. (“Rowland Coffee”), a privately-held company headquartered in Miami, Florida, for $362.8 million. The acquisition included a manufacturing, distribution, and office facility in Miami. The Company utilized cash on hand and borrowed $180.0 million under its revolving credit facility to fund the transaction. In addition, the Company has incurred one-time costs of $12.3 million through January 31, 2013, directly related to the merger and integration of Rowland Coffee, which includes approximately $5.7 million in noncash expense items that were reported in cost of products sold – restructuring and merger and integration. The remaining charges were reported in other restructuring and merger and integration costs in the Condensed Statements of Consolidated Income. Total one-time costs related to the acquisition are estimated to be approximately $25.0 million, including approximately $10.0 million of noncash charges, primarily accelerated depreciation, associated with consolidating coffee production currently in Miami into the Company’s existing facilities in New Orleans, Louisiana. The Company expects these costs to be incurred through fiscal 2015.

The acquisition of Rowland Coffee, a leading producer of espresso coffee in the U.S., strengthens and broadens the Company’s leadership in the U.S. retail coffee category by adding the leading Hispanic brands, Café Bustelo ^® and Café Pilon ^® , to the Company’s portfolio of brands.

8

The purchase price was allocated to the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their fair values at the date of acquisition. The Company determined the estimated fair values based on independent appraisals, discounted cash flow analyses, and estimates made by management. The purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired, and, as such, the excess was allocated to goodwill. The amount allocated to goodwill was primarily attributable to anticipated synergies and market expansion. The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date.

Goodwill of $84.8 million and $6.9 million was assigned to the U.S. Retail Coffee and the International, Foodservice, and Natural Foods segments, respectively. Of the total goodwill, $84.0 million is deductible for tax purposes.

The purchase price allocated to the identifiable intangible assets acquired is as follows:

If the Sara Lee foodservice business and Rowland Coffee acquisitions had occurred on May 1, 2011, pro forma consolidated net sales would have been approximately $4.4 billion for the nine months ended January 31, 2012, and the contribution of the acquired businesses would not have had a material impact to reported consolidated earnings for the nine months ended January 31, 2012. The pro forma consolidated results do not give effect to the synergies of the acquisitions and are not indicative of operations in current or future periods.

Note 4: Equity Method Investment

On March 26, 2012, the Company acquired a 25 percent equity interest in Guilin Seamild Biologic Technology Development Co., Ltd. (“Seamild”), a privately-owned manufacturer and marketer of oats products headquartered in Guilin in the Guangxi province of China, for $35.9 million. Seamild’s products, primarily oatmeal and oat-based cereals, are sold under the leading Seamild brand with distribution in retail channels throughout China. Seamild’s portfolio of quality, trusted products aligns with the Company’s strategy of owning and marketing leading food brands.

The initial investment in Seamild was recorded at cost and is included in other noncurrent assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The difference between the carrying amount of the investment and the underlying equity in net assets is primarily attributable to goodwill and other intangible assets. Under the equity method of accounting, the investment is adjusted for the Company’s proportionate share of earnings or losses, including consideration of basis differences resulting from the difference between the initial carrying amount of

9

the investment and the underlying equity in net assets. The investment did not have a material impact on the International, Foodservice, and Natural Foods segment or the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the three or nine months ended January 31, 2013.

Note 5: Restructuring

In calendar 2010, the Company announced its plan to restructure its coffee, fruit spreads, and Canadian pickle and condiments operations as part of its ongoing efforts to enhance the long-term strength and profitability of its leading brands. The initiative includes capital investments for a new state-of-the-art food manufacturing facility in Orrville, Ohio; consolidation of coffee production in New Orleans, Louisiana; and the transition of the Company’s pickle and condiments production to third-party manufacturers.

Upon completion, the restructuring plan will result in a reduction of approximately 850 full-time positions. As of January 31, 2013, approximately 80 percent of the 850 full-time positions have been reduced and the Sherman, Texas; Dunnville, Ontario; Delhi Township, Ontario; and Kansas City, Missouri facilities have been closed. The Ste. Marie, Quebec facility is anticipated to close in the next fiscal year.

The Company expects to incur restructuring costs of approximately $245.0 million, of which $218.9 million has been incurred through January 31, 2013.

The following table summarizes the restructuring activity, including the reserves established and the total amount expected to be incurred.

During the three and nine months ended January 31, 2013, total restructuring charges of $5.4 million and $30.1 million, respectively, were reported in the Condensed Statements of Consolidated Income. Of the total restructuring charges, $0.8 million and $6.4 million were reported in cost of products sold – restructuring and merger and integration in the three and nine months ended January 31, 2013, respectively, while the remaining charges were reported in other restructuring and merger and integration costs. During the three and nine months ended January 31, 2012, total restructuring charges of $25.6 million and $67.3 million, respectively, were reported in the Condensed Statements of Consolidated Income. Of the total restructuring charges, $12.0 million and $33.5 million were reported in cost of products sold – restructuring and merger and integration in the three and nine months ended January 31, 2012, respectively, while the remaining charges were reported in other restructuring and merger and integration costs. The restructuring costs classified as cost of products sold primarily include long-lived asset charges for accelerated depreciation related to property, plant, and equipment that had been used at the affected production facilities until they were closed or sold.

Employee separation costs include severance, retention bonuses, and pension costs. Severance costs and retention bonuses are being recognized over the estimated future service period of the affected employees. The obligation related to employee separation costs is included in other current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. For additional information on the impact of the restructuring plan on defined

10

benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans, see Note 11: Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits.

Other costs include professional fees, costs related to closing the facilities, and miscellaneous expenditures associated with the Company’s restructuring initiative and are expensed as incurred.

Subsequent to January 31, 2013, the Company announced its plan to expand capacity in order to support the Company’s growth expectations for its peanut and other nut butter businesses. Production expansion will include converting the Memphis, Tennessee fruit spreads facility into a peanut butter plant. The Memphis facility was originally scheduled to close as part of the previously announced fruit spreads restructuring plan.

Upon conversion of the Memphis facility, the Company intends to relocate its natural peanut butter production, currently produced at its New Bethlehem, Pennsylvania facility, to the Memphis facility. The New Bethlehem facility will then be converted to produce specialty nut butters, which are currently produced by third-party manufacturers. The Company expects to incur additional restructuring costs of approximately $10.0 million, increasing the total estimated restructuring costs to approximately $255.0 million. These additional costs are anticipated to be recognized through fiscal 2015 and primarily consist of site preparation and equipment relocation and production start-up costs. These changes to the restructuring program will not result in an additional reduction in the total number of full-time employees.

Note 6: Share-Based Payments

The Company provides for equity-based incentives to be awarded to key employees and non-employee directors. These incentives are administered primarily through the Company’s 2010 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan, and currently consist of restricted shares, restricted stock units (which may also be referred to as deferred stock units), performance units, and stock options.

The following table summarizes amounts related to share-based payments.

As of January 31, 2013, total compensation cost related to nonvested share-based awards not yet recognized was approximately $35.8 million. The weighted-average period over which this amount is expected to be recognized is 3.0 years.

11

Subsequent to January 31, 2013, the Company repurchased 1,226,028 common shares for approximately $113.3 million, resulting in 5,718,272 common shares remaining available for repurchase under the Board of Directors’ authorizations as of February 28, 2013.

Note 8: Reportable Segments

The Company operates in one industry: the manufacturing and marketing of food products. The Company has three reportable segments: U.S. Retail Coffee, U.S. Retail Consumer Foods, and International, Foodservice, and Natural Foods. The U.S. Retail Coffee segment primarily represents the domestic sales of Folgers ^® , Dunkin’ Donuts ^® , Millstone ^® , Café Bustelo, and Café Pilon branded coffee; the U.S. Retail Consumer Foods segment primarily includes domestic sales of Smucker’s ^® , Jif ^® , Crisco ^® , Pillsbury ^® , Eagle Brand ^® , Hungry Jack ^® , and Martha White ^® branded products; and the International, Foodservice, and Natural Foods segment is comprised of products distributed domestically and in foreign countries through retail channels, foodservice distributors and operators (e.g., restaurants, lodging, schools and universities, health care operators), and health and natural foods stores and distributors.

Segment profit represents revenue, less direct and allocable operating expenses, and is consistent with the way in which the Company manages its segments. However, the Company does not represent that the segments, if operated independently, would report the segment profit set forth below, as segment profit excludes certain operating expenses such as corporate administrative expenses.

12

All of the Company’s Senior Notes are unsecured and interest is paid semiannually. Scheduled principal payments are required on the 5.55 percent Senior Notes, the first of which is $50.0 million on April 1, 2013, and on the 4.50 percent Senior Notes, the first of which is $100.0 million on June 1, 2020. The Company may prepay at any time all or part of the Senior Notes at 100 percent of the principal amount thereof, together with accrued and unpaid interest, and any applicable make-whole amount.

The Company has available a $1.0 billion revolving credit facility with a group of nine banks that matures in July 2016. The Company did not have a balance outstanding under the revolving credit facility at January 31, 2013.

The Company’s debt instruments contain certain financial covenant restrictions including consolidated net worth, a leverage ratio, and an interest coverage ratio. The Company is in compliance with all covenants.

13

The following table reconciles the weighted-average common shares used in the basic and diluted earnings per share disclosures to the total weighted-average shares outstanding.