Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

Form 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2013

or

 

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Transition Period from             to             

Commission File Number 001-12755

 

 

Dean Foods Company

(Exact name of the registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

LOGO

 

 

 

Delaware   75-2559681

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. employer

identification no.)

2711 North Haskell Avenue, Suite 3400

Dallas, Texas 75204

(214) 303-3400

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of the registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer)”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   x    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)    Yes   ¨     No   x

As of April 26, 2013, the number of shares outstanding of each class of common stock was: 186,555,822.

Common Stock, par value $.01

 

 

 


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

 

               Page  

Part I — Financial Information

  

Item 1

   —      Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)      3   

Item 2

   —      Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations      38   

Item 3

   —      Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk      51   

Item 4

   —      Controls and Procedures      51   

Part II — Other Information

  

Item 1

   —      Legal Proceedings      52   

Item 6

   —      Exhibits      53   

Signatures

     54   

 

2


Table of Contents

Part I — Financial Information

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

DEAN FOODS COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share data)

 

     March 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 
ASSETS     

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 76,410      $ 78,975   

Receivables, net

     966,880        881,410   

Inventories

     433,326        407,912   

Deferred income taxes

     76,703        103,207   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     54,451        58,285   

Assets of discontinued operations

     —         672,989   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     1,607,770        2,202,778   

Property, plant and equipment, net

     1,812,908        1,873,279   

Goodwill

     847,487        852,427   

Deferred income taxes

     30,723        32,130  

Identifiable intangible and other assets, net

     714,246        726,477   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $         5,013,134      $         5,687,091   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY     

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ 1,062,823      $ 1,192,940   

Income tax payable

     441,960        1,186   

Current portion of debt

     15,000        25,535   

Current portion of litigation settlements

     20,000        20,000   

Liabilities of discontinued operations

     —         101,332   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     1,539,783        1,340,993   

Long-term debt

     1,782,518        3,077,258   

Deferred income taxes

     247,492        321,509   

Other long-term liabilities

     419,275        433,991   

Long-term litigation settlements

     54,230        53,712   

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)

    

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Dean Foods Company stockholders’ equity:

    

Preferred stock, none issued

     —         —    

Common stock, 186,516,236 and 185,563,534 shares issued and outstanding, with a par value of $0.01 per share

     1,865        1,856   

Additional paid-in capital

     1,368,098        1,375,812   

Accumulated deficit

     (341,292     (833,897

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (176,277     (186,584
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Dean Foods Company stockholders’ equity

     852,394        357,187   

Non-controlling interest

     117,442        102,441   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

     969,836        459,628   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 5,013,134      $ 5,687,091   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

DEAN FOODS COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share data)

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31
 
     2013     2012  

Net sales

   $         2,878,776      $         2,870,452   

Cost of sales

     2,165,000        2,146,885   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     713,776        723,567   

Operating costs and expenses:

    

Selling and distribution

     465,935        482,839   

General and administrative

     135,194        124,100   

Amortization of intangibles

     1,672        1,554   

Facility closing and reorganization costs

     5,610        25,435   

Impairment of long-lived assets

     33,915        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating costs and expenses

     642,326        633,928   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

     71,450        89,639   

Other (income) expense:

    

Interest expense

     64,373        45,515   

Other (income) expense, net

     (55     554   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other expense

     64,318        46,069   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

     7,132        43,570   

Income taxes

     3,597        17,111   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

     3,535        26,459   

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

     377        11,424   

Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax

     491,885        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

     495,797        37,883   

Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

     (3,192     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Dean Foods Company

   $ 492,605      $ 37,883   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Average common shares:

    

Basic

     186,021,192        184,104,804   

Diluted

     187,509,413        184,947,681   

Basic earnings per common share:

    

Income from continuing operations attributable to Dean Foods Company

   $ —        $ 0.15   

Income from discontinued operations attributable to Dean Foods Company

     2.65        0.06   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Dean Foods Company

   $ 2.65      $ 0.21   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share:

    

Income from continuing operations attributable to Dean Foods Company

   $ —        $ 0.14   

Income from discontinued operations attributable to Dean Foods Company

     2.63        0.06   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Dean Foods Company

   $ 2.63      $ 0.20   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

DEAN FOODS COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31
 
     2013     2012  

Net income

   $         495,797      $         37,883   

Other comprehensive income (loss):

    

Cumulative translation adjustment

     (15,050     13,303   

Net change in fair value of derivative instruments, net of tax

     20,460        4,726   

Net pension and other postretirement liability adjustment, net of tax

     2,851        1,719   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income

     8,261        19,748   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

     504,058        57,631   

Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest

     1,146        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income attributable to Dean Foods Company

   $ 502,912      $ 57,631   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

DEAN FOODS COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share data)

 

    Dean Foods Company Stockholders              
    Common Stock           Retained     Accumulated     Non-
controlling
Interest
    Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 
    Shares     Amount     Additional
Paid-In Capital
    Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
    Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
     

Balance, December 31, 2012

    185,563,534      $         1,856      $         1,375,812      $         (833,897   $         (186,584   $         102,441      $         459,628   

Issuance of common stock, net of tax impact of share-based compensation

    952,702        9        (1,425     —          —          —          (1,416

Share-based compensation expense

    —          —          1,300        —          —          —          1,300   

Share-based compensation expense for subsidiary shares

    —          —          —          —          —          6,266        6,266   

Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

    —          —          —          —          —          3,192        3,192   

Other comprehensive income (loss):

             

Net income attributable to Dean Foods Company

    —          —          —          492,605        —          —          492,605   

Change in fair value of derivative instruments, net of tax of $693

    —          —          —          —          972        11        983   

Amounts reclassified to income statement related to hedging activities, net of tax of $12,175

    —          —          —          —          19,477        —          19,477   

Cumulative translation adjustment

    —          —          —          —          (12,986     (2,064     (15,050

Pension and other postretirement benefit liability adjustment, net of tax of $1,555

    —          —          —          —          2,844        7        2,851   

Other activity with non-controlling interest

    —          —          (7,589     —          —          7,589        —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2013

    186,516,236      $ 1,865      $ 1,368,098      $ (341,292   $ (176,277   $ 117,442      $ 969,836   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

DEAN FOODS COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share data)

 

 

    Dean Foods Company Stockholders              
    Common Stock                 Accumulated     Non-
controlling
Interest
    Total
Stockholders’
Deficit
 
    Shares     Amount     Additional
Paid-In Capital
    Retained
Earnings
    Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
     

Balance, December 31, 2011

    183,745,789      $         1,837      $         1,086,804      $         (992,519   $         (199,520   $         4,747      $         (98,651

Issuance of common stock, net of tax impact of share-based compensation

    753,895        8        (8,603     —          —          —          (8,595

Share-based compensation expense

    —          —          1,630        —          —          —          1,630   

Wind-down of joint venture

    —          —          —          —          —          (4,747     (4,747

Other comprehensive income (loss):

             

Net income attributable to Dean Foods Company

    —          —          —          37,883        —          —          37,883   

Change in fair value of derivative instruments, net of tax benefit of $2,923

    —          —          —          —          (4,363     —          (4,363

Amounts reclassified to income statement related to hedging activities, net of tax of $6,060

    —          —          —          —          9,089        —          9,089   

Cumulative translation adjustment

    —          —          —          —          13,303        —          13,303   

Pension and other postretirement benefit liability adjustment, net of tax of $1,370

    —          —          —          —          1,719        —          1,719   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2012

    183,499,684      $ 1,845      $ 1,079,831      $ (954,636   $ (179,772   $ —        $ (52,732
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

7


Table of Contents

DEAN FOODS COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

                                     
     Three Months Ended
March 31
 
     2013     2012  

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

   $ 495,797      $ 37,883   

Income from discontinued operations

     (377     (11,424

Gain on sale of discontinued operations

     (491,885     —     

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     65,297        64,600   

Share-based compensation expense

     11,665        3,412   

Loss on divestitures and other, net

     355        12,129   

Impairment of long-lived assets

     33,915        —     

Write-off of financing costs

     1,426        —     

Deferred income taxes

     (6,272     29,097   

Other

     (2,121     2,255   

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Receivables

     (87,671     16,912   

Inventories

     (25,994     (18,589

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     861        (2,573

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

     (84,145     (51,752

Termination of interest rate swap liability

     (28,147     —     

Income taxes receivable/payable

     7,817        (6,789

Litigation settlements

     —          (61,325
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities - continuing operations

     (109,479     13,836   

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities - discontinued operations

     9,207        (9,864
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

     (100,272     3,972   

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Payments for property, plant and equipment

     (36,533     (39,785

Proceeds from insurance and other recoveries

     —          2,996   

Proceeds from sale of fixed assets

     1,649        1,554   

Other, net

     —          (790
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities - continuing operations

     (34,884     (36,025

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities - discontinued operations

     1,441,323        (4,732
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

     1,406,439        (40,757

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Repayment of Dean Foods Company senior secured term loan debt

             (1,027,197     (13,351

Proceeds from senior secured revolver

     154,250        633,100   

Payments for senior secured revolver

     (396,350     (587,600

Proceeds from receivables-backed facility

     220,000        797,567   

Payments for receivables-backed facility

     (220,000     (781,613

Proceeds from subsidiary senior secured credit facilities

     169,550        —     

Payments for subsidiary senior secured credit facilities

     (206,050     —     

Payments of financing costs

     (575     —     

Issuance of common stock, net of share repurchases for withholding taxes

     (753     (2,255

Tax savings on share-based compensation

     232        286   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities - continuing operations

     (1,306,893     46,134   

Net cash provided by financing activities - discontinued operations

     —          3,501   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     (1,306,893     49,635   

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     (1,839     3,358   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (2,565     16,208   

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

     78,975        115,650   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

   $ 76,410      $ 131,858   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

8


Table of Contents

1. General

Nature of Our Business — We are a leading food and beverage company and the largest processor and distributor of milk and other fluid dairy products in the United States, as well as a North American and European leader in branded plant-based beverages , such as soy, almond and coconut milks, and other plant-based food products. We align our leadership teams, operating strategies and supply chain initiatives around our two lines of business, the Ongoing Dean Foods segment, which is comprised of our ongoing core dairy operations formerly referred to as Fresh Dairy Direct, and The WhiteWave Foods Company (“WhiteWave”), which is our majority-owned, publicly traded subsidiary.

As discussed in Note 2, in October 2012, WhiteWave completed its initial public offering (the “WhiteWave IPO”). Upon completion of the WhiteWave IPO, we owned an 86.7% economic interest, and a 98.5% voting interest, in WhiteWave, which is now a publicly traded company whose Class A common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “WWAV”. On May 1, 2013, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of an aggregate of approximately 47.7 million shares of Class A common stock and approximately 67.9 million shares of Class B common stock of WhiteWave to holders of record of Dean Foods common stock at the close of business on May 17, 2013, the record date. The dividend will be distributed on May 23, 2013. Upon completion of the spin-off, we will cease to own a controlling financial interest in WhiteWave and we will no longer consolidate WhiteWave for financial reporting purposes, with a non-controlling interest adjustment for the economic interest in WhiteWave that we do not own. Additionally, upon completion of the spin-off, WhiteWave’s results of operations will be presented as discontinued operations.

Beginning in the first quarter of 2013, we have combined the results of our core dairy operations (historically referred to as our Fresh Dairy Direct business) and the corporate items previously categorized as “Corporate and Other” into a single reportable segment, Ongoing Dean Foods, as all of our corporate activities now directly support our ongoing core dairy operations. This change reflects the manner in which our Chief Executive Officer determines strategy and investment plans for our business given the changes to our operating structure as a result of the WhiteWave IPO and the announced spin-off, as well as the Morningstar sale. WhiteWave’s corporate costs, including the expense related to share-based compensation, are now reported entirely within its segment results. All segment results herein have been recast to present results on a comparable basis. These changes had no impact on consolidated net sales and operating income.

The Ongoing Dean Foods business is the largest processor and distributor of fluid milk and other dairy products in the United States, with products such as milk, ice cream, cultured dairy products, creamers, ice cream mix and other dairy products sold under more than 50 familiar local and regional brands and a wide array of private labels. Dean Foods also produces and distributes Tru Moo ® , which is our nationally branded, healthier, reformulated flavored milk.

Our WhiteWave business is comprised of our majority ownership interest in The WhiteWave Foods Company and its subsidiaries. WhiteWave manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells branded plant-based foods and beverages, coffee creamers and beverages, and premium dairy products throughout North America and Europe. WhiteWave’s widely-recognized, leading brands distributed in North America include Silk plant-based foods and beverages, International Delight and LAND O LAKES coffee creamers and beverages, and Horizon Organic premium dairy products, while its popular European brands of plant-based foods and beverages include Alpro and Provamel .

Basis of Presentation — The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been prepared on the same basis as the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K”), which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2013. In our opinion, we have made all necessary adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) in order to present fairly, in all material respects, our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates and for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been omitted. Our results of operations for the period ended March 31, 2013 may not be indicative of our operating results for the full year. The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Unless otherwise indicated, references in this report to “we,” “us” or “our” refer to Dean Foods Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole. On December 2, 2012, we entered into an agreement to sell our Morningstar division to a third party. The sale of our Morningstar division closed on January 3, 2013 and we received net proceeds of approximately $1.45 billion, a portion of which was used to retire outstanding debt under our senior secured credit facility. See Note 6. The operating results of our Morningstar division, previously reported within the Morningstar segment, have been reclassified as discontinued operations for all periods presented herein. See Note 3.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements — In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended the disclosure requirements regarding the reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendment does not change the current requirement for reporting net income or other comprehensive income, but requires

 

9


Table of Contents

additional disclosures about items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income, including changes in balances by component, significant items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and the income statement line items impacted by the reclassifications. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2013. See Note 10. Other than the additional disclosure requirements, the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2. WhiteWave Spin-Off Transaction

On October 31, 2012, WhiteWave completed the WhiteWave IPO, and sold 23 million shares of its Class A common stock at a price to the public of $17 per share. Prior to completion of the WhiteWave IPO, we contributed the capital stock of WWF Operating Company (“WWF Opco”), another wholly-owned subsidiary of ours that held substantially all of the assets and liabilities associated with our WhiteWave segment, to WhiteWave in exchange for 150 million shares of Class B common stock of WhiteWave.

The WhiteWave IPO was accounted for as an equity transaction in accordance with ASC 810 and no gain or loss has been recognized as we retained the controlling financial interest. This transaction increased our equity attributable to non-controlling interest by $98.1 million, which represented the carrying value of the non-controlling interest, increased our additional paid-in capital by $265 million and reduced our accumulated other comprehensive loss by $4.5 million.

WhiteWave contributed $282 million of the net proceeds from the WhiteWave IPO to WWF Opco, which used those proceeds, together with substantially all of the net proceeds of the initial borrowings described in Note 6, to repay then-outstanding obligations under intercompany notes owed to Dean Foods Company. Dean Foods Company subsequently utilized these proceeds to prepay a portion of the outstanding indebtedness under our senior secured credit facility. The remaining net proceeds of approximately $86 million were used to repay indebtedness under WhiteWave’s senior secured credit facilities, which is described below. See Note 6.

Upon completion of the WhiteWave IPO, we owned no shares of WhiteWave Class A common stock and 150 million shares of WhiteWave’s Class B common stock, which represents 100% of the outstanding shares of WhiteWave’s Class B common stock. The rights of the holders of the shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock are identical, except with respect to voting and conversion. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share, and each share of class B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share, subject to reduction in accordance with the terms of WhiteWave’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, on all matters presented to WhiteWave stockholders. Each share of Class B common stock is convertible into one share of Class A common stock at any time at our election and automatically in certain circumstances. Upon completion of the WhiteWave IPO, we owned an 86.7% economic interest, and a 98.5% voting interest, in WhiteWave.

On May 1, 2013, our Board of Directors approved the distribution to our stockholders of a portion of our remaining equity interest in WhiteWave and announced the approximate distribution ratios, record date and distribution date for the spin-off. On May 23, 2013, the distribution date, we will distribute to our stockholders an aggregate of approximately 47.7 million shares of WhiteWave Class A common stock and approximately 67.9 million shares of WhiteWave Class B common stock as a pro rata dividend on the outstanding shares of Dean Foods common stock they own as of 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on the record date of May 17, 2013. The actual distribution ratios for the WhiteWave Class A Common Stock and the WhiteWave Class B Common Stock will be determined based on the number of shares of Dean Foods common stock outstanding on the record date. Based on the number of shares of Dean Foods common stock currently outstanding as of March 31, 2013, we estimate that each share of Dean Foods common stock will receive approximately 0.256 shares of WhiteWave Class A common stock and approximately 0.364 shares of WhiteWave Class B common stock in the distribution.

Fractional shares of WhiteWave Class A common stock and WhiteWave Class B common stock will not be distributed to Dean Foods stockholders; instead, the fractional shares will be aggregated and sold in the open market, with the net proceeds distributed on a pro rata basis in the form of cash payments to Dean Foods stockholders who would otherwise hold WhiteWave fractional shares. The spin-off has been structured to qualify as a tax-free distribution to Dean Foods stockholders for U.S. federal tax purposes; however, the cash received in lieu of fractional shares will be taxable.

Additionally, on May 1, 2013, we announced that we have consented, as holder of a majority of the voting power of WhiteWave common stock, to the reduction in the voting rights of WhiteWave Class B common stock, effective upon the distribution. At such time, each share of WhiteWave Class B common stock will become entitled to ten votes with respect to the election and removal of directors and one vote with respect to all other matters submitted to a vote of WhiteWave’s stockholders. In anticipation of the distribution, we will, on the distribution date, provide notice to WhiteWave of the conversion of 82,086,000 shares of WhiteWave Class B common stock owned by us into 82,086,000 shares of WhiteWave Class A common stock, of which 47,686,000 shares of WhiteWave Class A common stock will be distributed by Dean Foods in the spin-off and 34,400,000 shares of WhiteWave Class A common stock will be retained by Dean Foods following the distribution. Dean Foods expects the conversion to be effective at the close of business on the distribution date.

 

10


Table of Contents

We intend to retain ownership of approximately 19.9% of WhiteWave’s Class A common stock, or 34,400,000 shares, which we expect to dispose of within 18 months of the distribution in one or more tax-free transactions.

Any disposition other than the spin-off is subject to various conditions, including Board approval, the receipt of any necessary regulatory or other approvals, the maintenance of the private letter ruling from the IRS, and the existence of satisfactory market conditions. There can be no assurance as to when any disposition other than the spin-off will be completed, if at all. Upon completion of the spin-off, WhiteWave’s results of operations will be presented as discontinued operations.

3. Discontinued Operations

On December 2, 2012, we entered into an agreement to sell our Morningstar division to a third party. Morningstar is a leading manufacturer of dairy and non-dairy extended shelf-life and cultured products, including creams and creamers, ice cream mixes, whipping cream, aerosol whipped toppings, iced coffee, half and half, value-added milks, sour cream and cottage cheese. The sale of our Morningstar division closed on January 3, 2013 and we received net proceeds of approximately $1.45 billion, a portion of which was used to retire outstanding debt under our senior secured credit facility. See Note 6. We recorded a gain of $871.3 million ($492.2 million, net of tax) on the sale of Morningstar, which excludes $22.9 million of transaction costs recognized in discontinued operations during the year ended December 31, 2012. The operating results of our Morningstar division, previously reported within the Morningstar segment, have been reclassified as discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and as of December 31, 2012.

The following is a summary of Morningstar’s assets and liabilities classified as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2012:

 

     December 31,
2012
 
     (In thousands)  

Assets

  

Current assets

   $ 154,211   

Property, plant and equipment, net

     176,582   

Goodwill

     306,095   

Identifiable intangibles and other assets, net

     36,101   
  

 

 

 

Assets of discontinued operations

   $ 672,989   
  

 

 

 

Liabilities

  

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ 94,188   

Debt

     97   

Other long-term liabilities

     7,047   
  

 

 

 

Liabilities of discontinued operations

   $         101,332   
  

 

 

 

The following is a summary of Morningstar’s operating results and certain other directly attributable expenses, including interest expense, which are included in discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

     March 31,  
     2013     2012  
     (In thousands)  

Operations:

    

Net sales

   $ 5,919      $ 343,642   

Income before income taxes

     609        18,135   

Income tax

     (232     (6,711
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

   $         377      $         11,424   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

11


Table of Contents

4. Inventories

Inventories, net of obsolescence reserves of $2.8 million and $3.6 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, consisted of the following:

 

     March 31,
2013
     December 31,
2012
 
     (In thousands)  

Raw materials and supplies

   $ 176,140       $ 173,151   

Finished goods

     257,186         234,761   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $         433,326       $         407,912   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2013 are as follows:

 

     Ongoing
Dean Foods
     WhiteWave     Total  
     (In thousands)  

Balance at December 31, 2012

   $ 86,841       $ 765,586      $ 852,427   

Foreign currency translation

     —          (4,940 )     (4,940
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2013

   $         86,841       $         760,646      $         847,487   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of our intangible assets other than goodwill as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows:

 

     March 31, 2013      December 31, 2012  
     Gross
Carrying
Amount
     Accumulated
Amortization
    Net
Carrying
Amount
     Gross
Carrying
Amount
     Accumulated
Amortization
    Net
Carrying
Amount
 
     (In thousands)  

Intangible assets with indefinite lives:

               

Trademarks(1)

   $ 571,311       $ —       $ 571,311       $ 576,806       $ —       $ 576,806   

Intangible assets with finite lives:

               

Customer-related and other (2)

     86,944         (41,865     45,079         90,957         (41,258     49,699   

Trademarks

     10,564         (6,265     4,299         10,564         (5,999     4,565   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $         668,819       $         (48,130   $         620,689       $         678,327       $         (47,257   $         631,070   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) In the first quarter of 2013, as a result declining volumes and projected future cash flows related to one of our Dean Foods indefinite-lived trademarks, we recorded an impairment charge of $2.9 million to reduce the carrying value of the trademark to its estimated fair value. This charge was recorded in the impairment of long-lived assets line item in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The remaining decrease in the carrying amount of indefinite-lived trademarks between December 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013 is the result of foreign currency translation adjustments in our WhiteWave segment.
(2) During the first quarter of 2013, we wrote off a favorable lease asset in our Ongoing Dean Foods segment with a net book value of $3.5 million in connection with our exit of the facility to which the favorable lease relates. This charge was recorded in the impairment of long-lived assets line item in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

12


Table of Contents

Amortization expense on intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $1.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively. Estimated aggregate intangible asset amortization expense for the next five years is as follows (in millions):

 

2013

   $         6.5   

2014

     5.9   

2015

     5.8   

2016

     5.4   

2017

     4.9   

6. Debt

Our outstanding debt as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 consisted of the following:

 

     March 31, 2013     December 31, 2012  
     Amount
Outstanding
    Interest
Rate
    Amount
Outstanding
    Interest
Rate
 
     (In thousands, except percentages)  

Dean Foods Company debt obligations:

        

Senior secured credit facility

   $ 22,900        1.01 %*    $ 1,292,197        4.82 %* 

Senior notes due 2016

     499,222        7.00        499,167        7.00   

Senior notes due 2018

     400,000        9.75        400,000        9.75   
  

 

 

     

 

 

   
     922,122          2,191,364     

Subsidiary debt obligations:

        

WhiteWave senior secured credit facilities

     744,050        2.04     780,550        2.20

Senior notes due 2017

     131,346        6.90        130,879        6.90   

Receivables-backed facility

     —          —          —          —     

Alpro revolving credit facility

     —          —          —          —     
  

 

 

     

 

 

   
     875,396          911,429     
  

 

 

     

 

 

   
     1,797,518          3,102,793     

Less current portion

     (15,000       (25,535  
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total long-term portion

   $         1,782,518        $         3,077,258     
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

* Represents a weighted average rate, including applicable interest rate margins, for the Dean Foods senior secured revolving credit facility and WhiteWave’s senior secured credit facilities.

The scheduled maturities of long-term debt at March 31, 2013 were as follows (in thousands):

 

     Total     Dean Foods Debt*     WhiteWave Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
 

2013

   $ 11,250      $ —        $ 11,250   

2014

     37,900        22,900        15,000   

2015

     21,250        —          21,250   

2016

     521,250        500,000        21,250   

2017

     579,800        142,000        437,800   

Thereafter

     637,500        400,000        237,500   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal

     1,808,950        1,064,900        744,050   

Less discounts

     (11,432     (11,432     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total outstanding debt

   $         1,797,518      $         1,053,468      $         744,050   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

* Includes the Dean Foods senior secured revolving credit facility, the receivables-backed facility, the Dean Foods senior notes and the subsidiary senior notes.

 

13


Table of Contents

Dean Foods Senior Secured Credit Facility — Our senior secured credit facility consisted of an original combination of a $1.5 billion five-year revolving credit facility, a $1.5 billion five-year term loan A and a $1.8 billion seven-year term loan B. In 2010, we amended and restated the agreement governing the senior secured credit facility, which included extension of the maturity dates for certain principal amounts, amendment of the maximum permitted leverage ratio and minimum interest coverage ratio and the addition of a senior secured leverage ratio (each as defined in our credit agreement), and the amendment of certain other terms.

In October 2012, we used the combined proceeds we received from the WhiteWave IPO and WhiteWave’s initial borrowings under its senior secured credit facilities described below to repay in full the then-outstanding $480 million aggregate principal amount of our 2014 Tranche A term loan and the then-outstanding $675 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 2014 Tranche B term loan. Additionally, as discussed in Note 3, on January 3, 2013, we completed the sale of our Morningstar division and received net proceeds of approximately $1.45 billion, a portion of which was used for the full repayment of $480 million in outstanding 2016 Tranche B term loan borrowings, $547 million in outstanding 2017 Tranche B term loan borrowings and $265 million in revolver borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2012. As a result of these principal repayments, we wrote off $1.5 million in previously deferred financing costs related to Dean Foods’ senior secured credit facility during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

At March 31, 2013, there were outstanding borrowings of $22.9 million under the revolving credit facility. Our average daily balance under the revolving credit facility during the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $8.0 million. Letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $1.0 million were issued under the revolving credit facility but undrawn as of March 31, 2013.

Effective April 2, 2012, pursuant to the terms of our amended and restated credit agreement dated June 30, 2010, the total commitment amount available to us under the senior secured revolving credit facility decreased from $1.5 billion to $1.275 billion, and any principal borrowings on a pro rata basis related to the $225 million of non-extended revolving credit facility commitments were reallocated to the remaining portion of the facility. Additionally, in connection with the WhiteWave IPO discussed in Note 2, effective October 31, 2012, we voluntarily reduced the total commitment amount available to us under the revolving credit facility from $1.275 billion to $1.0 billion. No principal payments are due on these revolving credit facility commitments until April 2, 2014. The amended and restated senior secured revolving credit facility is available for the issuance of up to $350 million of letters of credit and up to $150 million of swing line loans. Our credit agreement requires mandatory principal prepayments upon the occurrence of certain asset sales (provided that such sales, in total, exceed $250 million in any fiscal year), recovery events or as a result of exceeding certain leverage limits.

Our credit agreement permits us to complete acquisitions that meet all of the following conditions without obtaining prior approval: (1) the acquired company is involved in the manufacture, processing and distribution of food or packaging products or any other line of business in which we were engaged as of April 2007; (2) the net cash purchase price for any single acquisition is not greater than $500 million and not greater than $100 million if our leverage ratio is greater than 4.50 times consolidated EBITDA (as defined in our credit agreement) on a pro-forma basis; (3) we acquire at least 51% of the acquired entity; (4) the transaction is approved by the board of directors or shareholders, as appropriate, of the target; and (5) after giving effect to such acquisition on a pro-forma basis, we would have been in compliance with all financial covenants. All other acquisitions must be approved in advance by the required lenders.

The senior secured credit facility contains limitations on liens, investments and the incurrence of additional indebtedness, prohibits certain dispositions of property and restricts certain payments, including dividends. There are no restrictions on these certain payments, including dividends, when our leverage ratio is below 4.50 times consolidated EBITDA on a pro-forma basis. The senior secured credit facility is secured by liens on substantially all of our domestic assets, including the assets of our domestic subsidiaries, but excluding all assets of WhiteWave and its subsidiaries, the capital stock of subsidiaries of the former Dean Foods Company (“Legacy Dean”) and the capital stock of WhiteWave and its subsidiaries, the real property owned by Legacy Dean and its subsidiaries, and accounts receivable associated with the receivables-backed facility. In connection with the WhiteWave IPO, WhiteWave and its subsidiaries have been released from their obligations as guarantors of Dean Foods’ senior secured credit facility and designated as unrestricted subsidiaries thereunder.

The credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facility contains standard default triggers, including without limitation: failure to maintain compliance with the financial and other covenants contained in the credit agreement, default on certain of our other debt, a change in control and certain other material adverse changes in our business. The credit agreement does not contain any requirements to maintain specific credit rating levels.

WhiteWave Senior Secured Credit Facilities — On October 12, 2012, in connection with the WhiteWave IPO discussed in Note 2, WhiteWave entered into senior secured credit facilities, consisting of a five-year $850 million revolving credit facility, a five-year $250 million term loan A-1 and a seven-year $250 million term loan A-2. The revolving credit facility is available for the issuance of up to $75 million of letters of credit and up to $75 million of swing line loans.

 

14


Table of Contents

As of March 31, 2013, WhiteWave had total outstanding borrowings of $744 million under its senior secured credit facilities, which consisted of $496 million in term loan borrowings and $248 million drawn under its revolving credit facility.

The terms of WhiteWave’s senior secured credit facilities include the following:

 

   

maturity on October 31, 2017 for the term loan A-1 and revolving credit facility and October 31, 2019 for the $250 million term loan A-2 facility;

 

   

required annual amortization repayment in quarterly installments of the following amounts on the $250 million term loan A-1 facility: $12.5 million in 2013 and 2014, $18.75 million in 2015 and 2016, and $25.0 million in 2017, with the balance at maturity, and in the case of the $250 million term loan A-2 facility, $2.5 million in 2013 through 2019, with the balance at maturity;

 

   

an accordion feature allowing, under certain circumstances, the maximum principal amount of the senior secured credit facilities to be increased by up to $500 million, subject to lender commitments;

 

   

mandatory prepayments in the event of certain asset sales and receipt of insurance proceeds;

 

   

customary representations and warranties that are made at closing and upon each borrowing under the senior secured credit facilities;

 

   

customary affirmative and negative covenants for agreements of this type, including delivery of financial and other information, compliance with laws, further assurances, and limitations with respect to indebtedness, liens, fundamental changes, restrictive agreements, dispositions of assets, acquisitions and other investments, sale leaseback transactions, conduct of business, transactions with affiliates, and restricted payments; and

 

   

financial covenants establishing (a) a maximum consolidated net leverage ratio initially set at 4.25 to 1.00 and stepping down to 4.00 to 1.00 beginning March 31, 2014 and then to 3.75 to 1.00 beginning March 31, 2015 and thereafter (subject to WhiteWave’s right to increase such ratio by 0.50 to 1.00, but not to exceed 4.50 to 1.00, for the next four fiscal quarters following any permitted acquisition for which the purchase consideration equals or exceeds $50 million) and (b) a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio set at 3.00 to 1.00.

WhiteWave’s senior secured credit facilities are secured by security interests and liens on substantially all of its assets and the assets of its material domestic subsidiaries. The senior secured credit facilities are guaranteed by its material domestic subsidiaries. Dean Foods Company does not guarantee WhiteWave’s senior secured credit facilities. Borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities currently bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.75% per annum or, in the case of the $250 million term loan A-2 facility, LIBOR plus 2.00% per annum, and are subject to adjustment based on WhiteWave’s consolidated net leverage ratio.

Dean Foods Receivables-Backed Facility — We have a $550 million receivables securitization facility pursuant to which certain of our subsidiaries sell their accounts receivable to two wholly-owned entities intended to be bankruptcy-remote. The entities then transfer the receivables to third-party asset-backed commercial paper conduits sponsored by major financial institutions. The assets and liabilities of these two entities are fully reflected in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the securitization is treated as a borrowing for accounting purposes. The receivables-backed facility is available for the issuance of letters of credit of up to $300 million. In connection with the WhiteWave IPO described in Note 2, effective September 1, 2012, WWF Opco and its subsidiaries were no longer participants in the Dean Foods receivables securitization program. Additionally, our former Morningstar division and its subsidiaries ceased participation in the Dean Foods receivables securitization program effective November 1, 2012.

On March 8, 2013, we amended the agreement governing the receivables-backed facility. The terms of the agreement were modified to extend the liquidity termination date to March 6, 2015, to reduce the total commitment amount under the facility from $600 million to $550 million to reflect the sale of Morningstar and the WhiteWave IPO and announced spin-off, and to modify certain other terms. We incurred fees of $0.6 million in connection with the amendment, which were capitalized and will be amortized as a component of interest expense over the term of the receivables-backed facility.

Based on the monthly borrowing base formula, we had the ability to borrow up to $541.6 million of the total commitment amount under the receivables-backed facility as of March 31, 2013. The total amount of receivables sold to these entities as of March 31, 2013 was $735.7 million. During the first three months of 2013 we borrowed and subsequently repaid $220.0 million under the facility with no remaining drawn balances as of March 31, 2013, excluding letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $228.1 million that were issued under the facility but undrawn, resulting in remaining available borrowing capacity of $313.5 million at March 31, 2013. Our average daily balance under this facility during the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $4.9 million. The receivables-backed facility bears interest at a variable rate based upon commercial paper and one-month LIBOR rates plus an applicable margin.

 

15


Table of Contents

Standby Letter of Credit — In February 2012, in connection with a litigation settlement agreement we entered into with the plaintiffs in the Tennessee dairy farmer actions, we issued a standby letter of credit in the amount of $80 million, representing the subsequent payments due under the terms of the settlement agreement. The total amount of the letter of credit will decrease proportionately as we make each of the four installment payments. We expect to make the first installment payment in June 2013.

We are currently in compliance with all covenants under our credit agreements, and we expect to maintain such compliance for the foreseeable future.

Dean Foods Company Senior Notes due 2018 — On December 16, 2010, we issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of 9.75% senior unsecured notes in a private placement to qualified institutional buyers and in offshore transactions, and on August 3, 2011, we exchanged $400 million of the senior notes for new notes that are registered under the Securities Act and do not have restrictions on transfer, rights to special interest or registration rights. These notes are our senior unsecured obligations and mature on December 15, 2018 with interest payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year. The indenture under which we issued the senior notes due 2018 does not contain financial covenants but does contain covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur certain indebtedness, enter into sale-leaseback transactions and engage in mergers, consolidations and sales of all or substantially all of our assets. The carrying value of these notes at March 31, 2013 was $400.0 million.

Dean Foods Company Senior Notes due 2016 — On May 17, 2006, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 7.0% senior unsecured notes. The senior unsecured notes mature on June 1, 2016, and interest is payable on June 1 and December 1 of each year. The indenture under which we issued the senior notes due 2016 does not contain financial covenants but does contain covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur certain indebtedness, enter into sale-leaseback transactions and engage in mergers, consolidations and sales of all or substantially all of our assets. The carrying value of these notes at March 31, 2013 was $499.2 million.

Subsidiary Senior Notes due 2017 — Legacy Dean had certain senior notes outstanding at the time of its acquisition, of which one series ($142 million aggregate principal amount) remains outstanding with a maturity date of October 15, 2017. The carrying value of these notes at March 31, 2013 was $131.4 million at 6.90% interest. The indenture governing the Legacy Dean senior notes does not contain financial covenants but does contain certain restrictions, including a prohibition against Legacy Dean and its subsidiaries granting liens on certain of their real property interests and a prohibition against Legacy Dean granting liens on the stock of its subsidiaries. The Legacy Dean senior notes are not guaranteed by Dean Foods Company or Legacy Dean’s wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Alpro Revolving Credit Facility — White Wave’s Alpro operations have access to a multicurrency revolving credit facility with a borrowing capacity of €1 million (or its currency equivalent). The facility is unsecured and is guaranteed by various Alpro subsidiaries. Proceeds under the facility may be used for Alpro’s working capital and other general corporate purposes. The subsidiary revolving credit facility is available for the issuance of up to €1 million (or its currency equivalent) of letters of credit. On July 10, 2012, we renewed this facility under substantially similar terms. No principal payments are due under the subsidiary revolving credit facility until maturity on July 10, 2013. At March 31, 2013, there were no outstanding borrowings under this facility.

Interest Rate Agreements — See Note 7 for information related to interest rate swap arrangements associated with White Wave’s debt.

Guarantor Information — The 2016 and 2018 senior notes described above are our unsecured obligations and, except as described below, are fully and unconditionally, jointly and severally guaranteed by substantially all of our 100%-owned U.S. subsidiaries other than our receivables securitization subsidiaries. The following condensed consolidating financial statements present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Dean Foods Company (“Parent”), the 100%-owned subsidiary guarantors of the senior notes and, separately, the combined results of the 100%-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries that are not a party to the guarantees. The 100%-owned and majority-owned non-guarantor subsidiaries reflect certain foreign and other operations, in addition to our receivables securitization subsidiaries.

Upon completion of the WhiteWave IPO discussed in Note 2, WhiteWave and its wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries were released from their obligations as guarantors for the 2016 and 2018 senior notes. Accordingly, we have recast the financial information included in the tables below for all periods presented to include WhiteWave’s wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries within the non-guarantor column, as WhiteWave and its wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries are no longer guarantors of the 2016 or 2018 senior notes. Additionally, effective upon completion of the Morningstar sale on January 3, 2013, Morningstar and its subsidiaries were no longer parties to the guarantees. Therefore, the activity and balances allocated to discontinued operations related to the Morningstar divestiture have been recast in the table below for all periods presented to include Morningstar and its subsidiaries in the non-guarantor column as Morningstar and its subsidiaries are no longer guarantors of the 2016 or 2018 senior notes.

 

16


Table of Contents
     Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2013  
     Parent      Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
     Eliminations     Consolidated
Totals
 
     (In thousands)  

ASSETS

            

Current assets:

            

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 3,408       $ 6,689      $ 66,313       $ —        $ 76,410   

Receivables, net

     1,584         90,444        874,852         —          966,880   

Inventories

     —           287,456       145,870        —          433,326  

Intercompany receivables

     —           5,608,154        7,723         (5,615,877     —     

Other current assets

     86         89,532        41,536         —          131,154   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     5,078         6,082,275        1,136,294         (5,615,877     1,607,770   

Property, plant and equipment, net

     44         1,194,450        618,414         —          1,812,908   

Goodwill

     —           86,839        760,648         —          847,487   

Identifiable intangible and other assets, net

     104,019         274,840        366,110         —          744,969   

Investment in subsidiaries

     7,280,651         71,308        —           (7,351,959     —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 7,389,792       $ 7,709,712      $ 2,881,466       $ (12,967,836   $ 5,013,134   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

            

Current liabilities:

            

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ 79,621       $ 716,507      $ 266,695       $ —        $ 1,062,823   

Income taxes payable

     436,351         (166     5,775         —          441,960   

Intercompany payables

     4,920,073         —          695,804         (5,615,877     —     

Current portion of debt

     —           —          15,000         —          15,000   

Current portion of litigation settlements

     20,000         —          —           —          20,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     5,456,045         716,341        983,274         (5,615,877     1,539,783   

Long-term debt

     922,122         131,346        729,050         —          1,782,518   

Other long-term liabilities

     105,001         279,621        282,145         —          666,767   

Long-term litigation settlements

     54,230         —          —           —          54,230   

Dean Foods Company stockholders’ equity (deficit)

     852,394         6,582,404        769,555         (7,351,959     852,394   

Non-controlling interest

     —           —          117,442         —          117,442   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

     852,394         6,582,404        886,997         (7,351,959     969,836   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $         7,389,792       $         7,709,712      $         2,881,466       $         (12,967,836   $         5,013,134   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

17


Table of Contents
     Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2012  
     Parent      Guarantor
Subsidiaries
     Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
     Eliminations     Consolidated
Totals
 
     (In thousands)  

ASSETS

             

Current assets:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 15,242       $ —         $ 63,733       $ —        $ 78,975   

Receivables, net

     972         40,080         840,358         —          881,410   

Inventories

     —           261,265         146,647         —          407,912   

Intercompany receivables

     —           4,327,839         —           (4,327,839     —     

Other current assets

     6,464         112,021         43,007         —          161,492   

Assets of discontinued operations

     —           —           672,989        —          672,989   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     22,678         4,741,205         1,766,734         (4,327,839     2,202,778   

Property, plant and equipment, net

     4         1,244,616         628,659         —          1,873,279   

Goodwill

     —           86,839         765,588         —          852,427   

Identifiable intangible and other assets, net

     101,950         280,043         376,614         —          758,607   

Investment in subsidiaries

     6,325,265         74,054         —           (6,399,319     —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 6,449,897       $ 6,426,757       $ 3,537,595       $ (10,727,158   $ 5,687,091   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

             

Current liabilities:

             

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ 133,689       $ 769,644       $ 290,793       $ —        $ 1,194,126   

Intercompany payables

     3,582,794         —           745,045         (4,327,839     —     

Current portion of debt

     10,535         1         14,999         —          25,535   

Current portion of litigation settlements

     20,000         —           —           —          20,000   

Liabilities of discontinued operations

     —           —           101,332        —          101,332   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     3,747,018         769,645         1,152,169         (4,327,839     1,340,993   

Long-term debt

     2,180,829         130,879         765,550         —          3,077,258   

Other long-term liabilities

     111,151         352,784         291,565         —          755,500   

Long-term litigation settlements

     53,712         —           —           —          53,712   

Dean Foods Company stockholders’ equity (deficit)

     357,187         5,173,449         1,225,870         (6,399,319     357,187   

Non-controlling interest

     —           —           102,441         —          102,441   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

     357,187         5,173,449         1,328,311         (6,399,319     459,628   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $         6,449,897       $         6,426,757       $         3,537,595       $         (10,727,158   $         5,687,091   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

18


Table of Contents
     Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
 
     Parent     Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Eliminations     Consolidated
Totals
 
     (In thousands)  

Net sales

   $ —        $ 2,289,172      $ 589,604      $ —        $ 2,878,776   

Cost of sales

     —          1,794,893        370,107        —          2,165,000   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     —          494,279        219,497        —          713,776   

Selling and distribution

     —          339,734        126,201        —          465,935   

General and administrative

     (3 )     84,820        50,377        —          135,194   

Amortization of intangibles

     —          950        722        —          1,672   

Facility closing and reorganization costs

     —          5,610        —          —          5,610   

Impairment of long-lived assets

     —          30,501        3,414        —          33,915   

Interest expense

     55,692       2,885        5,796        —          64,373   

Other (income) expense, net

     —          362        (417     —          (55
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries

     (55,689 )     29,417        33,404        —          7,132   

Income tax expense (benefit)

     (20,414 )     12,092        11,919        —          3,597   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries

     (35,275 )     17,325        21,485        —          3,535   

Equity in earnings (loss) of consolidated subsidiaries

     527,880       (2,545     —          (525,335 )     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

     492,605       14,780        21,485        (525,335 )     3,535   

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

     —          —          377        —          377   

Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax

     —          491,885        —          —          491,885   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

     492,605       506,665        21,862        (525,335 )     495,797   

Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

     —          —          (3,192     —          (3,192
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Dean Foods Company

     492,605       506,665        18,670        (525,335 )     492,605   

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, attributable to Dean Foods Company

     22,055       141        (11,889     —          10,307   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Dean Foods Company

   $         514,660     $         506,806      $         6,781      $         (525,335 )   $         502,912   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

19


Table of Contents
     Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
 
     Parent     Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
     Eliminations     Consolidated
Totals
 
     (In thousands)  

Net sales

   $ —        $ 2,345,014      $ 525,438       $ —        $ 2,870,452   

Cost of sales

     —          1,814,696        332,189         —          2,146,885   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     —          530,318        193,249         —          723,567   

Selling and distribution

     —          363,637        119,202         —          482,839   

General and administrative

     2,879       94,891        26,330         —          124,100   

Amortization of intangibles

     —          939        615         —          1,554   

Facility closing and reorganization costs

     —          25,435        —           —          25,435   

Interest expense

     41,272       3,178        1,065         —          45,515   

Other (income) expense, net

     (2,900 )     (12,344     15,798         —          554   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries

     (41,251 )     54,582        30,239         —          43,570   

Income tax expense (benefit)

     (15,686 )     22,714        10,083         —          17,111   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries

     (25,565 )     31,868        20,156         —          26,459   

Equity in earnings (loss) of consolidated subsidiaries

     63,448       (840     —           (62,608 )     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

     37,883       31,028        20,156         (62,608 )     26,459   

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

     —          —          11,424         —          11,424   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Dean Foods Company

     37,883       31,028        31,580         (62,608 )     37,883   

Other comprehensive income, net of tax, attributable to Dean Foods Company

     6,464       132        13,152         —          19,748   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Dean Foods Company

   $         44,347     $         31,160      $         44,732       $         (62,608 )   $         57,631   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

20


Table of Contents
     Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
 
     Parent     Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Consolidated
Totals
 
     (In thousands)  

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Net cash used in operating activities — continuing operations

   $ (12,739   $ (91,038   $ (5,702   $ (109,479

Net cash provided by operating activities — discontinued operations

     —          —          9,207       9,207   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

     (12,739     (91,038     3,505       (100,272

Cash flows from investing activities:

        

Payments for property, plant and equipment

     (40     (15,761     (20,732 )     (36,533

Proceeds from sale of fixed assets

     —          (128     1,777       1,649   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities — continuing operations

     (40     (15,889     (18,955 )     (34,884

Net cash provided by investing activities — discontinued operations

     1,441,323        —          —          1,441,323   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

     1,441,283        (15,889     (18,955     1,406,439   

Cash flows from financing activities:

        

Repayment of Dean Foods Company senior secured term loan debt

     (1,027,197     —          —          (1,027,197

Proceeds from senior secured revolver

     154,250       —          —          154,250  

Payments for senior secured revolver

     (396,350     —          —          (396,350

Proceeds from receivables-backed facility

     —          —          220,000        220,000   

Payments for receivables-backed facility

     —          —          (220,000     (220,000

Proceeds from subsidiary senior secured credit facilities

     —          —          169,550        169,550   

Payments for subsidiary senior secured credit facilities

     —          —          (206,050 )     (206,050 )

Payment of financing costs

     (575     —          —          (575

Issuance of common stock, net of share repurchases for withholding taxes

     (753     —          —          (753

Tax savings on share-based compensation

     232       —          —          232  

Net change in intercompany balances

     (169,985     113,616        56,369        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     (1,440,378     113,616        19,869        (1,306,893

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     —          —          (1,839     (1,839
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (11,834     6,689        2,580       (2,565

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

     15,242        —          63,733       78,975   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

   $         3,408      $         6,689      $         66,313      $         76,410   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

21


Table of Contents
     Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
 
     Parent     Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Consolidated
Totals
 
     (In thousands)  

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities — continuing operations

   $ (48,427   $ (40,546 )   $ 102,809        13,836  

Net cash used in operating activities — discontinued operations

     —          —          (9,864     (9,864
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

     (48,427 )     (40,546     92,945        3,972   

Cash flows from investing activities:

        

Payments for property, plant and equipment

     —          (19,484     (20,301     (39,785

Proceeds from insurance and other recoveries

     —          2,996        —          2,996   

Proceeds from sale of fixed assets

     —          1,330        224        1,554   

Other, net

     —          (275 )     (515 )     (790 )
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities — continuing operations

     —          (15,433     (20,592     (36,025

Net cash used in investing activities — discontinued operations

     —          —          (4,732     (4,732
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     —          (15,433     (25,324     (40,757

Cash flows from financing activities:

        

Repayment of Dean Foods Company senior secured term loan debt

     (13,335 )     21,588        (21,604     (13,351

Proceeds from senior secured revolver

     633,100       —          —          633,100   

Payments for senior secured revolver

     (587,600 )     —          —          (587,600

Proceeds from receivables-backed facility

     —          —          797,567        797,567   

Payments for receivables-backed facility

     —          —          (781,613     (781,613

Issuance of common stock, net of share repurchases for withholding taxes

     (2,255 )     —          —          (2,255 )

Tax savings on share-based compensation

     286       —          —          286  

Net change in intercompany balances

     37,201       34,466        (71,667     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities — continuing operations

     67,397       56,054        (77,317     46,134   

Net cash provided by financing activities — discontinued operations

     —          —          3,501        3,501   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     67,397       56,054        (73,816     49,635   

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     —          —          3,358        3,358   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     18,970       75        (2,837     16,208   

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

     3,061       6,709        105,880        115,650   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

   $         22,031      $         6,784      $         103,043      $         131,858   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

22


Table of Contents

7. Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

Derivative Financial Instruments

Interest Rates — We have historically entered into interest rate swap agreements that were designated as cash flow hedges against variable interest rate exposure on a portion of our debt, with the objective of minimizing the impact of interest rate fluctuations and stabilizing cash flows. These swap agreements provided hedges for interest on our senior secured credit facility by fixing the LIBOR component of interest rates specified in the Dean Foods senior secured credit facility at the interest rates specified in the interest rate swap agreements until the indicated expiration dates of these interest rate swap agreements.

As disclosed in Note 3, on January 3, 2013, we completed the sale of our Morningstar division and used a portion of the proceeds to repay in full our outstanding 2016 and 2017 Tranche B term loan borrowings. As a result of these repayments, we determined that we no longer had sufficient levels of variable rate debt to support the $1 billion aggregate notional amount of interest rate hedges maturing in 2013 and 2016 that were outstanding as of December 31, 2012. Accordingly, on January 4, 2013, we terminated these interest rate swaps, and upon termination, we paid the counterparties $28.0 million based on the fair value of the swaps on that date. As we have determined that the forecasted transactions hedged by these swaps are no longer probable, we reclassified total losses of $28.1 million ($17.3 million, net of tax) previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income to interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

In connection with the WhiteWave IPO discussed in Note 2, on October 31, 2012, we novated certain of our then-outstanding interest rate swaps with a notional value of $650 million and a maturity date of March 31, 2017 (the “2017 swaps”) to WhiteWave. WhiteWave is now the sole counterparty to the financial institutions under these swap agreements and will be directly responsible for any required future settlements, and the sole beneficiary of any future receipts of funds, pursuant to the terms of the 2017 swaps.

The following table summarizes WhiteWave’s interest rate agreements in effect as of March 31, 2013:

 

Fixed Interest Rates

  

Expiration
Date

   Notional Amounts  
          (In millions)  

2.75% to 3.19%

   March 31, 2017    $         650   

WhiteWave is exposed to market risk under these arrangements due to the possibility of interest rates on its senior secured credit facilities rising above the fixed rates in the interest rate swap agreements. Credit risk under these arrangements is believed to be remote as the counterparties to WhiteWave’s interest rate swap agreements are major financial institutions; however, if any of the counterparties to WhiteWave’s hedging arrangements become unable to fulfill their obligation, WhiteWave may lose the financial benefits of these arrangements.

As of the novation date, the 2017 swaps were de-designated and subsequent changes in fair value are reflected in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, with a non-controlling interest adjustment for the 13.3% economic interest in WhiteWave that we do not own. As described in Note 2, unless and until a spin-off or other disposition transaction occurs after which we cease to own a controlling financial interest in WhiteWave, we will continue to consolidate WhiteWave for financial reporting purposes. Additionally, we have determined that the underlying hedged forecasted transactions related to the 2017 swaps remains probable; therefore, amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income associated with the 2017 swaps will continue to be reclassified into the income statement as the underlying hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. However, the completion of the anticipated spin-off transaction will result in a determination that the underlying forecasted transaction is no longer probable, which will subsequently trigger the recognition of a significant amount of accumulated other comprehensive income in earnings, as a component of interest expense. As of March 31, 2013, total losses of approximately $63.4 million (approximately $38.9 million, net of tax) were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income related to the 2017 swaps.

Commodities — We are exposed to commodity price fluctuations, including milk, organic and non-genetically modified (“non-GMO”) soybeans, butterfat, sweeteners and other commodity costs used in the manufacturing, packaging and distribution of our products, such as, natural gas, resin and diesel fuel. To secure adequate supplies of materials and bring greater stability to the cost of ingredients and their related manufacturing, packaging and distribution, we routinely enter into forward purchase contracts and other purchase arrangements with suppliers.

Under the forward purchase contracts, we commit to purchasing agreed-upon quantities of ingredients and commodities at agreed-upon prices at specified future dates. The outstanding purchase commitment for these commodities at any point in time typically ranges from one month’s to one year’s anticipated requirements, depending on the ingredient or commodity. These contracts are considered normal purchases.

 

23


Table of Contents

In addition to entering into forward purchase contracts, from time to time we may purchase over-the-counter contracts from our qualified banking partners or enter into exchange-traded commodity futures contracts for raw materials that are ingredients of our products or components of such ingredients. Certain of the contracts offset the risk of increases in our commodity costs and are designated as cash flow hedges when appropriate. There was no material hedge ineffectiveness related to our commodities contracts designated as hedging instruments during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. Other contracts may be executed related to certain customer pricing arrangements. We have not designated such contracts as hedging instruments; therefore, the contracts are marked to market at each reporting period, and a derivative asset or liability is recorded on our balance sheet. A summary of our open commodities contracts recorded at fair value in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is included in the table below.

Although we may utilize forward purchase contracts and other instruments to mitigate the risks related to commodity price fluctuation, such strategies do not fully mitigate commodity price risk. Adverse movements in commodity prices over the terms of the contracts or instruments could decrease the economic benefits we derive from these strategies.

Foreign Currency — Sales in foreign countries, as well as certain expenses related to those sales, are transacted in currencies other than our reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. Our foreign currency exchange rate risk is primarily limited to the Euro and the British pound. We may, from time to time, employ derivative financial instruments to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency rates or enter into forward currency exchange contracts to hedge our net investment and intercompany payable or receivable balances in foreign operations.

As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, our derivatives recorded at fair value in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of the following:

 

 

     Derivative Assets      Derivative Liabilities  
     March 31,
2013
     December 31,
2012
     March 31,
2013
     December 31,
2012
 
     (In thousands)  

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments

           

Interest rate swap contracts — current(1)

   $ —        $ —        $ —        $ 17,716   

Interest rate swap contracts — noncurrent(2)

     —          —          —          10,432   

Commodities contracts — current(1)

     1,404        776        118        1,143   

Foreign currency contracts — current(1)

     —          —          126        489   

Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments

           

Interest rate swap contracts — current (1)

     —          —          18,288        18,262   

Interest rate swap contracts — noncurrent (2)

     —          —          44,118        48,669   

Commodities contracts — current(1)

     431        964        389        742   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total derivatives

   $     1,835      $         1,740      $         63,039      $         97,453   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Derivative assets and liabilities that have settlement dates equal to or less than 12 months from the respective balance sheet date are included in other current assets and accounts payable and accrued expenses, respectively, in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2) Derivative assets and liabilities that have settlement dates greater than 12 months from the respective balance sheet date are included in identifiable intangible and other assets, net and other long-term liabilities, respectively, in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

24


Table of Contents

Gains and losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

 

     Three months ended
March  31,
2013
    Three months ended
March  31,
2012
 
     (In thousands)  

Losses on interest rate swap contracts(1)

   $     31,408      $         13,996   

Losses on commodities contracts(2)

     321        1,136   

(Gains)/Losses on foreign currency contracts(3)

     (78     17   

 

(1) Recorded in interest expense in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(2) Recorded in distribution expense or cost of sales, depending on commodity type, in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(3) Recorded in cost of sales in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Based on current commodity prices and exchange rates, we estimate that $1.3 million of hedging activity related to our commodities contracts and $0.1 million of hedging activity related to our foreign currency contracts will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income within the next 12 months. We expect the spin-off of White Wave to trigger the reclassification of significant additional amounts of accumulated other comprehensive income in earnings during the second quarter of 2013.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering assumptions, we follow a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

 

   

Level 1 — Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

 

   

Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations, in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.

 

   

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

A summary of our derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2013 is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

     Fair Value
as of
March 31,
2013
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

Liability — Interest rate swap contracts

   $         62,406       $         —         $         62,406       $         —     

Asset — Commodities contracts

     1,835         —           1,835         —     

Liability — Commodities contracts

     507         —           507         —     

Liability — Foreign currency contracts

     126         —           126         —     

A summary of our derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

     Fair Value
as of
December 31, 2012
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

Liability — Interest rate swap contracts

   $ 95,079       $         —         $ 95,079       $         —     

Asset — Commodities contracts

     1,740         —           1,740         —     

Liability — Commodities contracts

     1,885         —           1,885         —     

Asset – Foreign currency contracts

     489         —           489         —     

The fair value of the interest rate swaps is determined based on the notional amounts of the swaps and the forward LIBOR curve relative to the fixed interest rates under the swap agreements. The fair value of our commodities contracts is based on the quantities and fixed prices under the agreements and quoted forward commodity prices. The fair value of our foreign currency contracts is based

 

25


Table of Contents

on the notional amounts and rates under the contracts and observable market forward exchange rates. We classify these instruments in Level 2 because quoted market prices can be corroborated utilizing observable benchmark market rates at commonly quoted intervals, observable current and forward commodity market prices on active exchanges, and observable market transactions of spot currency rates and forward currency prices. We have not changed our valuation techniques from prior periods.

Due to their near-term maturities, the carrying amounts of accounts receivable and accounts payable are considered equivalent to fair value. In addition, because the interest rates on our senior secured credit facility, White Wave’s senior secured credit facilities, and certain other debt are variable, their fair values approximate their carrying values.

The fair values of our Dean Foods Company senior notes and subsidiary senior notes were determined based on quoted market prices obtained through an external pricing source which derives its price valuations from daily marketplace transactions, with adjustments to reflect the spreads of benchmark bonds, credit risk and certain other variables. We have determined these fair values to be Level 2 measurements as all significant inputs into the quotes provided by our pricing source are observable in active markets. The following table presents the carrying values and fair values of our senior and subsidiary senior notes at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

 

     March 31, 2013      December 31, 2012  
     Carrying Value      Fair Value      Carrying Value      Fair Value  
     (In thousands)  

Subsidiary senior notes due 2017

   $         131,346       $         153,005       $         130,879       $         155,135   

Dean Foods Company senior notes due 2016

     499,222         554,375         499,167         551,875   

Dean Foods Company senior notes due 2018

     400,000         463,000         400,000         459,000   

Additionally, we maintain a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”), which is a nonqualified deferred compensation arrangement for our executive officers and other employees earning compensation in excess of the maximum compensation that can be taken into account with respect to our 401(k) plan. The SERP is designed to provide these employees with retirement benefits from us that are equivalent, as a percentage of total compensation, to the benefits provided to other employees. The assets related to this plan are primarily invested in money market and mutual funds and are held at fair value. We classify these assets as Level 2 as fair value can be corroborated based on quoted market prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active. The following table presents a summary of the SERP assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2013 (in thousands):

 

     Total      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

Money market

   $ 2,760       $ —         $ 2,760       $ —     

Mutual funds

     3,372         —           3,372         —     

The following table presents a summary of the SERP assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

 

     Total      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

Money market

   $ 2,941       $ —         $ 2,941       $ —     

Mutual funds

     3,337         —           3,337         —     

 

26


Table of Contents

8. Common Stock and Share-Based Compensation

Stock Options  — The following table summarizes stock option activity during the first three months of 2013:

 

 

     Options     Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
     Weighted
Average
Contractual
Life (Years)
     Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Options outstanding at January 1, 2013

     15,136,937      $         19.64         

Granted

     —          —           

Forfeited and canceled(1)

     (139,719     19.03         

Exercised

     (639,976     13.11         
  

 

 

         

Options outstanding at March 31, 2013

     14,357,242        19.96         4.77       $         26,475,047   
  

 

 

         

Options exercisable at March 31, 2013

     12,561,562        21.15         4.07         14,715,886   

 

(1) Pursuant to the terms of our stock option plans, options that are forfeited or canceled may be available for future grants.

We recognize share-based compensation expense for stock options ratably over the vesting period. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes valuation model. The following weighted average assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of grants issued during these periods:

 

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31
 
     2013 (1)      2012  

Expected volatility

     —           44%   

Expected dividend yield

     —           0%   

Expected option term

     —           5 years   

Risk-free rate of return

     —           0.88% to 0.89%   

 

(1) We do not plan to grant any Dean Foods stock options during 2013.

Restricted Stock Units  — The following table summarizes restricted stock unit (“RSU”) activity during the first three months of 2013:

 

     Employees     Directors     Total  

Stock units outstanding at January 1, 2013

             1,722,569                114,339                1,836,908   

Stock units issued

     314,715        67,450        382,165   

Shares issued upon vesting of stock units

     (526,551     (38,319     (564,870

Stock units canceled or forfeited(1)

     (316,838     —          (316,838
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Stock units outstanding at March 31, 2013

     1,193,895        143,470        1,337,365   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average grant date fair value

   $ 13.39      $ 10.65      $ 13.28   

 

(1) Pursuant to the terms of our stock unit plans, employees have the option of forfeiting stock units to cover their minimum statutory tax withholding when shares are issued. Stock units that are canceled or forfeited become available for future grants.

Cash Performance Units — We grant awards of cash performance units (“CPUs”) as part of our long-term incentive compensation program under the terms of our 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The CPU awards are cash-settled awards and are designed to link compensation of certain executive officers and other key employees to our performance over a three-year period. The performance metric for the 2011 and 2012 CPUs, as defined in the award agreements, is the performance of our stock price relative to that of a peer group of companies. For CPU awards granted in 2013, the Compensation Committee changed the performance metric to bank earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“Bank EBITDA”). Bank EBITDA is defined as adjusted operating income plus depreciation and amortization plus all non-cash expenses.

 

27


Table of Contents

The range of payout under the CPU awards is between 0% and 200% and is payable in cash at the end of each respective performance period. The fair value of the awards is remeasured at each reporting period. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period with a corresponding liability, which is recorded in other long-term liabilities in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table summarizes CPU activity with respect to the 2011 and 2012 CPU awards during the first three months of 2013:

 

 

     Units  

Outstanding at January 1, 2013

     3,431,250   

Granted (1)

     —     

Converted/paid (2)

     (2,481,250

Forfeited

     —     
  

 

 

 

Outstanding at March 31, 2013 (3)

     950,000   
  

 

 

 

 

(1) As described above, the performance metric for the CPU awards granted in 2013 is Bank EBITDA. As the underlying value of these awards is not derived from or linked to our stock price, these awards are not share-based in nature and accordingly they have been excluded from the table above.
(2) In connection with the WhiteWave IPO, the 2011 and 2012 CPU awards were valued for WhiteWave executives based on performance as of December 31, 2012 instead of at the end of the originally scheduled 36-month performance periods. We paid out the cash value of the vested portions of these awards during the three months ended March 31, 2013.
(3) In April 2013, the vested portions of the remaining 2011 and 2012 CPUs that were outstanding as of March 31, 2013 were paid out in connection with the departure of the individuals to whom these awards were granted.

Phantom Shares  — We grant phantom shares as part of our long-term incentive compensation program, which are similar to RSUs in that they are based on the price of our stock and vest ratably over a three-year period, but are cash-settled based upon the value of our stock at each vesting period. The fair value of the awards is remeasured at each reporting period. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period with a corresponding liability, which is recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table summarizes the phantom share activity during the first three months of 2013:

 

     Shares     Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
 

Outstanding at January 1, 2013

     1,292,913      $ 11.39   

Granted

     554,077        16.35   

Converted/paid

     (510,097     11.19   

Forfeited

     (15,994     11.59   
  

 

 

   

Outstanding at March 31, 2013

     1,320,899        11.53   
  

 

 

   

Share-Based Compensation Expense — The following table summarizes the share-based compensation expense recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and includes amounts related to Whitewave’s equity-based grants described more fully in the section below:

 

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31
 
     2013     2012  
     (In thousands)  

Stock Options

   $ 3,767      $ (1,032

Stock Units

     4,585        2,317   

Cash Performance Units

     —   (1)       440   

Phantom Shares

     3,312        924   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $         11,664      $         2,649   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) As described above, the performance metric for the CPU awards granted in 2013 is Bank EBITDA. As the underlying value of these awards is not derived from or linked to our stock price, these awards are not share-based in nature and accordingly the expense related to such awards during the three months ended March 31, 2013 has been excluded from the table above.

 

28


Table of Contents

Grants of WhiteWave Equity-Based Awards — In connection with the WhiteWave IPO discussed in Note 2, on October 25, 2012, WhiteWave issued one-time equity awards (the “IPO Grants”) with an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $30 million in order to, among other things, provide executives and employees with an immediate equity interest in WhiteWave and align their interests with those of WhiteWave’s stockholders. The IPO Grants consisted of a combination of stock options, RSUs, phantom shares, cash awards and stock appreciation rights (“SARS”). Additionally, during the first three months of 2013, in connection with WhiteWave’s annual long-term incentive compensation cycle, WhiteWave granted a combination of stock options, RSUs and phantom shares with an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $14 million. The grant date fair value of WhiteWave’s RSUs and phantom shares was based on WhiteWave’s closing stock price on the date of grant. The grant date fair value of WhiteWave’s stock options was based on WhiteWave’s stock price as of the grant dates and a set of Black-Scholes assumptions specific to WhiteWave, which were as follows:

 

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
2013
     Year Ended
December 31,
2012
 

Expected volatility

     28%         28%   

Expected dividend yield

     0%         0%   

Expected option term

     6 years         6 years   

Risk-free rate of return

     1.13%         1.05%   

Compensation expense related to these grants will be recognized over the requisite service period. WhiteWave recognized $6.2 million in share-based compensation expense related to its equity classified plans during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

We expect that certain of our outstanding Dean Foods stock options and unvested restricted stock units held by WhiteWave employees on the date of the spin-off will be converted to equivalent options or restricted stock units, as applicable, with respect to WhiteWave’s common stock. These modified awards will otherwise have substantially the same terms and conditions, including term and vesting provisions, as the existing Dean Foods Company equity awards will have at the time of conversion. Additionally, in connection with the spin-off, we expect to proportionately adjust the number and exercise prices of certain options, RSUs and phantom shares granted to Dean Foods employees that were outstanding at the time of the spin-off to maintain the aggregate intrinsic value of such awards at the date of the spin-off, pursuant to the terms of these awards.

 

29


Table of Contents

9. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted EPS is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and the effect of all dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during each period. The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators used in the computations of both basic and diluted EPS:

 

    Three Months Ended March 31  
    2013     2012  
    (In thousands, except share data)  

Basic EPS computation:

   

Numerator:

   

Income from continuing operations

  $ 3,535      $ 26,459   

Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

    (3,192 )     —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations attributable to Dean Foods Company

  $ 343      $ 26,459   

Denominator:

   

Average common shares

    186,021,192        184,104,804   

Basic EPS from continuing operations attributable to Dean Foods Company

  $ —        $ 0.15   

Diluted EPS computation:

   

Numerator:

   

Income from continuing operations

  $ 3,535      $ 26,459   

Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

    (3,192     —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations attributable to Dean Foods Company

  $ 343      $ 26,459   

Denominator:

   

Average common shares — basic

        186,021,192            184,104,804   

Stock option conversion(1)

    827,156        42,301   

Stock units(2)

    661,065        800,576   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Average common shares — diluted

    187,509,413        184,947,681   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted EPS from continuing operations attributable to Dean Foods Company

  $ —        $ 0.14   

(1) Anti-dilutive options excluded

    10,692,708        18,571,275   

(2) Anti-dilutive stock units excluded

    23,118        421,509   

 

30


Table of Contents

10. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component, net of tax, during the three months ended March 31, 2013 were as follows:

 

     Gains/Losses on
Cash Flow Hedges
    Pension and Other
Postretirement
Benefits Items
    Foreign Currency
Items
    Total     Non-controlling
Interest
 

Balance, December 31, 2012

   $ (58,452   $ (105,845   $ (22,287   $ (186,584   $ (3,683

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

     972        4,913        (12,986     (7,101     (2,046

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income

     19,477        (2,069     0        17,408        (3
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

     20,449        2,844        (12,986     10,307        (2,049
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2013

   $ (38,003   $ (103,001   $ (35,273   $ (176,277   $ (5,732
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

As discussed in Note 7, on January 4, 2013, we terminated $1 billion aggregate notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturity dates in 2013 and 2016. As a result of these terminations, we reclassified total losses of $28.1 million ($17.3 million net of tax) previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income to the interest expense line item in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

 

31


Table of Contents

11. Employee Retirement and Postretirement Benefits

We sponsor various defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans, including various employee savings and profit sharing plans, and contribute to various multiemployer pension plans on behalf of our employees. Substantially all full-time union and non-union employees who have completed one or more years of service and have met other requirements pursuant to the plans are eligible to participate in one or more of these plans.

Defined Benefit Plans — The benefits under our defined benefit plans are based on years of service and employee compensation.

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31
 
     2013     2012  
     (In thousands)  

Components of net periodic pension cost:

    

Service cost

   $ 1,284      $ 1,126   

Interest cost

     3,260        3,631   

Expected return on plan assets

             (4,682             (4,402

Amortizations:

    

Unrecognized transition obligation

     —          28   

Prior service cost

     202        194   

Unrecognized net loss

     3,099        2,918   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

   $ 3,163      $ 3,495   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Postretirement Benefits — Certain of our subsidiaries provide health care benefits to certain retirees who are covered under specific group contracts.

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31
 
     2013      2012  
     (In thousands)  

Components of net periodic benefit cost:

     

Service cost

   $         204       $         147   

Interest cost

     306         337   

Amortizations:

     

Prior service cost/(credit)

     6         6   

Unrecognized net loss

     75         32   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

   $ 591       $ 522   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

32


Table of Contents

12. Asset Impairment Charges and Facility Closing and Reorganization Costs

Asset Impairment Charges

We evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment when circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Indicators of impairment could include, among other factors, significant changes in the business environment or the planned closure of a facility. Considerable management judgment is necessary to evaluate the impact of operating changes and to estimate future cash flows. As a result of certain changes to our business, including the loss of a portion of a significant customer’s volume and related plans for consolidating the production network for our core dairy operations, during the first quarter of 2013, we evaluated the impact that we expect these changes to have on our projected future cash flows. This analysis identified indicators of impairment at certain of our production facilities and therefore we were required to test the assets at those facilities for recoverability.

Testing the assets for recoverability involved developing estimates of future cash flows directly associated with, and that are expected to arise as a direct result of, the use and eventual disposition of the assets. The inputs for the fair value calculations were based on assessment of an individual asset’s alternative use within other production facilities, evaluation of recent market data and historical liquidation sales values for similar assets. As the inputs into these calculations are largely based on management’s judgments and are not generally observable in active markets, we consider such measurements to be Level 3 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 7.

The results of our analysis indicated an impairment of our plant, property and equipment of $27.5 million, which we recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2013. Additionally, as discussed in Note 5, we recorded impairments related to certain intangible assets of approximately $6.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013. All of these charges were recorded in the impairment of long-lived assets line item in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We can provide no assurance that we will not have impairment charges in future periods as a result of changes in our business environment, operating results or the assumptions and estimates utilized in our impairment tests.

Facility Closing and Reorganization Costs

Approved plans within our multi-year initiatives and related charges are summarized as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31
 
     2013      2012  
     (In thousands)  

Closure of facilities(1)

   $ 1,002       $ 817   

Organization Optimization Initiative (2)

     5         (674

Functional Realignment(3)

     103         25,336   

Field and Functional Reorganization (4)

     4,500         —     

Other

     —           (44
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $         5,610       $         25,435   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) These charges in 2013 and 2012 primarily relate to facility closures in Buena Park, California; Shreveport, Louisiana; Bangor, Maine; and Newport, Kentucky, as well as other approved closures. We have incurred $31.4 million of charges related to these initiatives to date. We expect to incur additional charges related to these facility closures of $0.9 million, related to shutdown and other costs. As we continue the evaluation of our supply chain and distribution network, as well as our accelerated cost reduction efforts, it is likely that we will close additional facilities in the future.
(2) In the first quarter of 2011 we initiated a significant cost reduction program that was incremental to our other ongoing cost-savings initiatives. This initiative was focused on permanently removing costs out of our business through organizational and corporate departmental redesigns, driven by process simplification and standardization, centralization of activities and reorganization to drive growth in our core customers and categories. As part of this program, we eliminated approximately 300 corporate and field positions during 2011. We incurred $24.0 million of charges related to this initiative, and we do not expect to incur any additional charges under this program.
(3)

During the first quarter of 2012, our management team reassessed our company-wide strategy, resulting in a shift in focus to deploying our capital and strategically investing in the value-added segments of our business. With this new strategy, our goal was to invest our strategic capital primarily in those initiatives that yield higher returns over shorter time frames. In connection with this change, our management team approved a cost reduction plan that was incremental to any other prior cost savings initiative. This initiative was focused on aligning key functions within our Ongoing Dean Foods operations (formerly referred to as our Fresh Dairy Direct operations) under a single leadership team and permanently removing costs from the organization and certain functions that supported this segment of our business. During the first half of 2012, we eliminated approximately 120

 

33


Table of Contents
  positions at our corporate headquarters that directly supported the former Fresh Dairy Direct business. Charges recorded during 2013 and 2012 are related to workforce reduction costs, the write-down of certain information technology assets and leasehold improvements, lease termination costs and costs associated with exiting other commitments deemed not necessary to execute our new strategy. We have incurred total charges of approximately $32.3 million under this initiative to date and we do not expect to incur any material future charges related to this plan.
(4) During the fourth quarter of 2012, our executive management team approved a plan to reorganize our field organization and certain functional areas that support our regional business teams, including finance, distribution, operations and human resources. We believe this streamlined leadership structure will enable faster decision-making and create enhanced opportunities to build our ongoing Dean Foods dairy business. We have incurred total charges of $10.5 million under this plan to date, all of which are associated with headcount reductions. We do not currently expect to incur any material charges going forward related to this initiative.

Activity with respect to facility closing and reorganization costs during the three months ended March 31, 2013 is summarized below and includes items expensed as incurred:

 

     Accrued
Charges at
December 31,
2012
     Charges     Payments     Accrued
Charges at
March 31,
2013
 
     (In thousands)  

Cash charges:

         

Workforce reduction costs

   $ 11,579       $ 4,134      $ (1,473   $ 14,240   

Shutdown costs

     0         386        (371     15   

Lease obligations after shutdown

     1,986         (141     (504     1,341   

Other

     227         73        (299     1   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal

   $         13,792         4,452      $         (2,647   $         15,597   
  

 

 

      

 

 

   

 

 

 

Noncash charges:

         

Write-down of assets (1)

        1,037       

Other

        121       
     

 

 

     

Total charges

      $         5,610       
     

 

 

     

 

(1) The write-down of assets relates primarily to owned buildings, land and equipment of those facilities identified for closure. The assets were tested for recoverability at the time the decision to close the facilities was more likely than not to occur. Our methodology for testing the recoverability of the assets is consistent with the methodology described in the “Asset Impairment Charges” section above.

13. Commitments and Contingencies

Contingent Obligations Related to Divested Operations  — We have divested certain businesses in prior years. In each case, we have retained certain known contingent obligations related to those businesses and/or assumed an obligation to indemnify the purchasers of the businesses for certain unknown contingent liabilities, including environmental liabilities. We believe that we have established adequate reserves which are immaterial to the financial statements for potential liabilities and indemnifications related to our divested businesses. Moreover, we do not expect any liability that we may have for these retained liabilities, or any indemnification liability, to materially exceed amounts accrued.

Contingent Obligations Related to Milk Supply Arrangements  — On December 21, 2001, in connection with our acquisition of Legacy Dean, we purchased Dairy Farmers of America’s (“DFA”) 33.8% interest in our operations. In connection with that transaction, we issued a contingent, subordinated promissory note to DFA in the original principal amount of $40 million. The promissory note has a 20-year term that bears interest based on the consumer price index. Interest will not be paid in cash but will be added to the principal amount of the note annually, up to a maximum principal amount of $96 million. We may prepay the note in whole or in part at any time, without penalty. The note will only become payable if we materially breach or terminate one of our related milk supply agreements with DFA without renewal or replacement. Otherwise, the note will expire in 2021, without any obligation to pay any portion of the principal or interest. Payments made under the note, if any, would be expensed as incurred. We have not terminated, and we have not materially breached, any of our milk supply agreements with DFA related to the promissory note. We have previously terminated unrelated supply agreements with respect to several plants that were supplied by DFA. In connection with our goals of accelerated cost control and increased supply chain efficiency, we continue to evaluate our sources of raw milk supply.

 

34


Table of Contents

Insurance  — We retain selected levels of property and casualty risks, primarily related to employee health care, workers’ compensation claims and other casualty losses. Many of these potential losses are covered under conventional insurance programs with third party carriers with high deductible limits. In other areas, we are self-insured. These deductibles are $2.0 million per claim for casualty claims but may vary higher or lower due to insurance market conditions and risk. We believe that we have established adequate reserves to cover these claims.

Lease and Purchase Obligations  — We lease certain property, plant and equipment used in our operations under both capital and operating lease agreements. Such leases, which are primarily for machinery, equipment and vehicles, have lease terms ranging from one to 20 years. We did not have any capital lease obligations as of March 31, 2013. Certain of the operating lease agreements require the payment of additional rentals for maintenance, along with additional rentals based on miles driven or units produced. Certain leases require us to guarantee a minimum value of the leased asset at the end of the lease. Our maximum exposure under those guarantees is not a material amount.

We have entered into various contracts, in the normal course of business, obligating us to purchase minimum quantities of raw materials used in our production and distribution processes, including diesel fuel, soybeans and organic raw milk. We enter into these contracts from time to time to ensure a sufficient supply of raw ingredients. In addition, we have contractual obligations to purchase various services that are part of our production process.

Litigation, Investigations and Audits

Tennessee Retailer and Indirect Purchaser Actions

A putative class action antitrust complaint (the “retailer action”) was filed on August 9, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. Plaintiffs allege generally that we, either acting alone or in conjunction with others in the milk industry who are also defendants in the retailer action, lessened competition in the Southeastern United States for the sale of processed fluid Grade A milk to retail outlets and other customers, and that the defendants’ conduct also artificially inflated wholesale prices for direct milk purchasers. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in the retailer action was granted in part and denied in part in August 2010. Defendants filed a motion for reconsideration on September 10, 2010, and filed a supplemental motion for summary judgment as to the remaining claims on September 27, 2010. On March 27, 2012, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants as to all remaining counts and entered judgment in favor of all defendants, including the Company. Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on April 25, 2012. On May 30, 2012, the Company participated in a scheduling conference and mediation conducted by the appeals court. The mediation did not result in a settlement agreement. Briefing on the appeal was completed on April 5, 2013. The appeals court has not set a date for oral argument at this time.

On June 29, 2009, another putative class action lawsuit was filed in the Eastern District of Tennessee, Greeneville Division, on behalf of indirect purchasers of processed fluid Grade A milk (the “indirect purchaser action”). The allegations in this complaint are similar to those in the retailer action, but primarily involve state law claims. Because the allegations in the indirect purchaser action substantially overlap with the allegations in the retailer action, the Court granted the parties’ joint motion to stay all proceedings in the indirect purchaser action pending the outcome of the summary judgment motions in the retailer action. On August 16, 2012, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their lawsuit. On January 17, 2013, these same plaintiffs filed a new lawsuit in the Eastern District of Tennessee, Greeneville Division, on behalf of a putative class of indirect purchasers of processed fluid Grade A milk (the “2013 indirect purchaser action”). The allegations are similar to those in the voluntarily dismissed indirect purchaser action, but involve only claims arising under Tennessee law. The Company filed a motion to dismiss on April 30, 2013.

Other than the material pending legal proceedings set forth above, we are party from time to time to certain claims, litigations, audits and investigations. Potential liabilities associated with the other matters referred to in this paragraph are not expected to have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

At this time, it is not possible for us to predict the ultimate outcome of the matters set forth within this section.

Other

We are in varying stages of discussion with numerous states to determine whether we have complied with state unclaimed property laws. Most, but not all, of these states have appointed an agent to conduct an examination of our books and records. In addition to seeking remittance of unclaimed property, some states may also seek interest and penalties. We do not expect the ultimate outcomes of these examinations to have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

14. Segment, Geographic and Customers Information

We have two reportable segments: the Ongoing Dean Foods segment, and WhiteWave, which is our publicly traded, majority-owned subsidiary. Beginning in the first quarter of 2013, we have combined the results of our ongoing Dean Foods core dairy operations (previously referred to as our Fresh Dairy Direct business) and the corporate items previously categorized as “Corporate

 

35


Table of Contents

and Other” into a single reportable segment, Ongoing Dean Foods, as all of our corporate activities now directly support the ongoing Dean Foods core dairy business. This change reflects the manner in which our Chief Executive Officer determines strategy and investment plans for our business given the changes to our operating structure as a result of the WhiteWave IPO and the announced spin-off, as well as the Morningstar sale.

Our Ongoing Dean Foods operations represent our largest segment, with 77 manufacturing facilities geographically located largely based on local and regional customer needs and other market factors. Dean Foods manufactures, markets and distributes a wide variety of branded and private label dairy case products, including milk, ice cream, cultured dairy products, creamers, ice cream mix and other dairy products to retailers, distributors, foodservice outlets, educational institutions and governmental entities across the United States. Our products are primarily delivered through what we believe to be one of the most extensive refrigerated direct store delivery (“DSD”) systems in the United States.

WhiteWave manufactures, develops, markets and sells a variety of nationally and internationally branded plant-based food and beverages, such as Silk soy, almond and coconut milks, and Alpro and Provamel soy, almond and hazelnut drinks and food products; nationally branded coffee creamers and beverages, including International Delight and LAND O LAKES ; and nationally branded premium dairy products, such as Horizon Organic milk. WhiteWave sells its products to a variety of customers, including grocery stores, mass merchandisers, club stores and convenience stores, as well as through various other away-from-home channels, including restaurants and foodservice outlets, across North America and Europe. The majority of the WhiteWave products are delivered through warehouse delivery systems. As discussed in Note 2, upon completion of the WhiteWave IPO, we owned an 86.7% economic interest, and a 98.5% voting interest, in WhiteWave, which is now a publicly traded company whose Class A common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “WWAV”. Upon completion of the spin-off, we will cease to own a controlling financial interest in WhiteWave and we will no longer consolidate WhiteWave for financial reporting purposes, with a non-controlling interest adjustment for the economic interest in WhiteWave that we do not own. Additionally, upon completion of the spin-off, WhiteWave’s results of operations will be presented as discontinued operations.

On December 2, 2012, we entered into an agreement to sell our Morningstar division, and we completed the sale of these operations on January 3, 2013. The operating results of our Morningstar division, previously reported within the Morningstar segment, have been reclassified as discontinued operations for all periods presented herein. See Note 3.

Our Chief Executive Officer, who is our chief operating decision maker, evaluates the performance of our segments based on sales and operating income or loss before gains and losses on the sale of businesses, facility closing and reorganization costs, litigation settlements, impairments of long-lived assets and foreign exchange gains and losses. We do not report revenue by product or product category as it is impracticable to do so due to certain system limitations.

A portion of our WhiteWave products are produced, distributed and sold by our Ongoing Dean Foods segment. In the past, those sales, together with their related costs, were included in the WhiteWave segment for management and segment reporting purposes. From a cost perspective, the results of these transactions may not have been equivalent to the terms that would prevail in arm’s length transactions, and, as a result of the commercial agreements described below, this presentation is no longer consistent with the way our management team evaluates the performance of our segments. Accordingly, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2012, the results of these transactions were no longer included in the WhiteWave segment and are instead reflected in the Ongoing Dean Foods segment for management and segment reporting purposes.

In connection with the WhiteWave IPO discussed in Note 2, our separate lines of businesses entered into agreements with each other that formalize and, in certain cases, modify ongoing commercial arrangements. These agreements became effective October 31, 2012. As described above, following their effectiveness and for so long as WhiteWave is consolidated for financial reporting purposes, these agreements will impact our intersegment sales and their related costs, but will be eliminated in consolidation. Upon completion of the spin-off of WhiteWave, these intersegment sales will become third-party sales that, along with their related costs, will no longer be eliminated in consolidation.

Additionally, our reporting segments have not historically included an allocation of the expense related to share-based compensation or the costs related to previously shared services such as audit services, corporate development, human resources, strategy, tax or treasury. However, WhiteWave’s corporate costs, including the expense related to share-based compensation, are now reported entirely within its segment results as presented below.

All segment results herein have been recast to present results on a comparable basis. These changes had no impact on consolidated net sales and operating income.

 

36


Table of Contents

The amounts in the following tables are obtained from reports used by our executive management team and do not include any allocated income taxes or management fees. There are no significant non-cash items reported in segment profit or loss other than depreciation and amortization.

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31
 
     2013     2012  
     (In thousands)  

Net sales to external customers:

    

Ongoing Dean Foods

   $         2,292,430      $         2,347,722   

WhiteWave

     586,346        522,730   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 2,878,776      $ 2,870,452   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Intersegment sales:

    

Ongoing Dean Foods

   $ 6,466      $ 13,380   

WhiteWave

     21,899        29,298   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 28,365      $ 42,678   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income:

    

Ongoing Dean Foods

   $ 68,981      $ 68,079   

WhiteWave

     41,994        46,995   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total reportable segment operating income

     110,975        115,074   

Facility closing and reorganization costs

     5,610        25,435   

Impairment of long-lived assets

     33,915        0   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 71,450      $ 89,639   

Other (income) expense:

    

Interest expense

     64,373        45,515   

Other (income) expense, net

     (55     554   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes

   $ 7,132      $ 43,570   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     March 31,
2013
     December 31,
2012
 
     (In thousands)  

Assets:

     

Ongoing Dean Foods

   $ 2,852,035       $ 2,879,057   

WhiteWave

     2,161,099         2,135,045   

Discontinued Operations

     0         672,989   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $         5,013,134       $         5,687,091   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Geographic Information  — Net sales and long-lived assets for our domestic and foreign operations are shown in the table below.

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31
 
     2013      2012  
     (In thousands)  

Net sales to external customers:

     

Domestic

   $         2,774,291       $         2,773,081   

Foreign

     104,485         97,371   

 

     March 31,
2013
     December 31,
2012
 

Long-lived assets:

     

Domestic

   $         2,979,395       $         3,037,046   

Foreign

     425,969         447,267   

Significant Customers  — Our largest customer accounted for approximately 22% and 21% of our consolidated net sales in the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. Sales to this customer were included in our Ongoing Dean Foods and WhiteWave segments.

 

37


Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Forward-looking statements are predictions based on our current expectations and our projections about future events, and are not statements of historical fact. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning our business strategy, among other things, including anticipated trends and developments in, and management plans for, our business and the markets in which we operate. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words, such as “estimate,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “forecast,” “foresee,” “likely,” “may,” “should,” “goal,” “target,” “might,” “will,” “could,” “predict,” and “continue,” the negative or plural of these words and other comparable terminology. All forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q are based upon information available to us as of the filing date of this Form 10-Q, and we undertake no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements for any reason. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these statements. These factors include the matters discussed in “Part I — Item 1A — Risk Factors” in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described under these sections.

Business Overview

We are a leading food and beverage company and the largest processor and distributor of milk and other fluid dairy products in the United States as well as a North American and European leader in branded plant-based beverages, such as soy, almond and coconut milks, and other plant-based food products. As we continue to evaluate and seek to maximize the value of our leading brands and product offerings, we have aligned our leadership teams, operating strategies, and supply chain initiatives around our two reportable segments: the Ongoing Dean Foods, which operations comprise the core dairy business historically referred to as Fresh Dairy Direct as well as the corporate activities previously reported in “Corporate and Other” as described more fully in the “Matters Affecting Comparability” section below; and The WhiteWave Foods Company (“WhiteWave”), which is our publicly traded, majority-owned subsidiary. Since the completion of the WhiteWave IPO in October 2012, we have owned an 86.7% economic interest, and a 98.5% voting interest, in WhiteWave. On May 1, 2013, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of an aggregate of approximately 47.7 million shares of Class A common stock and approximately 67.9 million shares of Class B common stock of WhiteWave to holders of record of Dean Foods common stock at the close of business on May 17, 2013, the record date. The dividend will be distributed on May 23, 2013. Upon completion of the spin-off, we will cease to own a controlling financial interest in WhiteWave and we will no longer consolidate WhiteWave for financial reporting purposes, with a non-controlling interest adjustment for the economic interest in WhiteWave that we do not own. Additionally, upon completion of the spin-off, WhiteWave’s results of operations will be presented as discontinued operations. See Note 2 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding WhiteWave’s initial public offering (the “WhiteWave IPO”) and the announced spin-off transaction.

On December 2, 2012, we entered into an agreement to sell our Morningstar division, which is a leading manufacturer of dairy and non-dairy extended shelf-life and cultured products, including creams and creamers, ice cream mixes, whipping cream, aerosol whipped toppings, iced coffee, half and half, value-added milks, sour cream and cottage cheese. We completed the sale of our Morningstar division on January 3, 2013. The operating results of our Morningstar division, previously reported within the Morningstar segment, have been reclassified as discontinued operations in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and as of December 31, 2012. See Note 3 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding our discontinued operations. Unless stated otherwise, any reference to income statement items in these financial statements refers to results from continuing operations.

Ongoing Dean Foods — The Ongoing Dean Foods segment is the largest processor and distributor of fluid milk in the United States and is our largest segment, representing approximately 80% of our consolidated net sales in the three months ended March 31, 2013. Our Ongoing Dean Foods core dairy business manufactures, markets and distributes a wide variety of branded and private label dairy case products, including fluid milk, ice cream, cultured dairy products, creamers, ice cream mix and other dairy products to retailers, distributors, foodservice outlets, educational institutions and governmental entities across the United States. These products are distributed under well-recognized regional brands such as Country Fresh ® , Dean’s ® , Garelick Farms ® , Mayfield ® and Oak Farms ® , as well as familiar local brands and private labels. Fresh Dairy Direct also produces and distributes Tru Moo ® , which is our nationally branded, healthier, reformulated flavored milk. Due to the perishable nature of our products, we deliver the majority of our products directly to our customers’ locations in refrigerated trucks or trailers that we own or lease. We believe that we have one of the most extensive refrigerated direct store delivery (“DSD”) systems in the United States. Our products are sold primarily on a local or regional basis through local and regional sales forces, although some national customer relationships are coordinated by a centralized corporate sales department.

 

38


Table of Contents

WhiteWave — WhiteWave’s net sales were approximately 20% of our consolidated net sales in the three months ended March 31, 2013. WhiteWave is a leading consumer packaged food and beverage company focused on high-growth product categories that are aligned with emerging consumer trends. WhiteWave manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells branded plant-based foods and beverages, coffee creamers and beverages, and premium dairy products throughout North America and Europe. WhiteWave’s widely-recognized, leading brands distributed in North America include Silk plant-based foods and beverages, International Delight and LAND O LAKES coffee creamers and beverages, and Horizon Organic premium dairy products, while its popular European brands of plant-based foods and beverages include Alpro and Provamel .

Recent Developments

WhiteWave Spin-Off Transaction — On May 1, 2013, our Board of Directors approved the distribution to our stockholders of a portion of our remaining equity interest in WhiteWave and announced the approximate distribution ratios, record date and distribution date for the spin-off. On May 23, 2013, the distribution date, we will distribute to our stockholders an aggregate of approximately 47.7 million shares of WhiteWave Class A common stock and approximately 67.9 million shares of WhiteWave Class B common stock as a pro rata dividend on the outstanding shares of Dean Foods common stock they own as of 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on the record date of May 17, 2013. The actual distribution ratios for the WhiteWave Class A Common Stock and the WhiteWave Class B Common Stock will be determined based on the number of shares of Dean Foods common stock outstanding on the record date. Based on the number of shares of Dean Foods common stock currently outstanding as of March 31, 2013, we estimate that each share of Dean Foods common stock will receive approximately 0.256 shares of WhiteWave Class A common stock and approximately 0.364 shares of WhiteWave Class B common stock in the distribution.

Fractional shares of WhiteWave Class A common stock and WhiteWave Class B common stock will not be distributed to Dean Foods stockholders; instead, the fractional shares will be aggregated and sold in the open market, with the net proceeds distributed on a pro rata basis in the form of cash payments to Dean Foods stockholders who would otherwise hold WhiteWave fractional shares. The spin-off has been structured to qualify as a tax-free distribution to Dean Foods stockholders for U.S. federal tax purposes; however, the cash received in lieu of fractional shares will be taxable.

Additionally, on May 1, 2013, we announced that we have consented, as holder of a majority of the voting power of WhiteWave common stock, to the reduction in the voting rights of WhiteWave Class B common stock, effective upon the distribution. At such time, each share of WhiteWave Class B common stock will become entitled to 10 votes with respect to the election and removal of directors and one vote with respect to all other matters submitted to a vote of WhiteWave’s stockholders. In anticipation of the distribution, we will, on the distribution date, provide notice to WhiteWave of the conversion of 82,086,000 shares of WhiteWave Class B common stock owned by us into 82,086,000 shares of WhiteWave Class A common stock, of which 47,686,000 shares of WhiteWave Class A common stock will be distributed by Dean Foods in the spin-off and 34,400,000 shares of WhiteWave Class A common stock will be retained by Dean Foods following the distribution. Dean Foods expects the conversion to be effective at the close of business on the distribution date.

We intend to retain ownership of approximately 19.9% of WhiteWave’s Class A common stock, or 34,400,000 shares, which we expect to dispose of within 18 months of the distribution in one or more tax-free transactions. Any disposition other than the spin-off is subject to various conditions, including Board approval, the receipt of any necessary regulatory or other approvals, the maintenance of the private letter ruling from the IRS, the receipt of an opinion of counsel and the existence of satisfactory market conditions. There can be no assurance as to when any disposition other than the spin-off will be completed, if at all. Upon completion of the spin-off, WhiteWave’s results of operations will be presented as discontinued operations. See Note 2 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the announced spin-off transaction.

 

39


Table of Contents

Changes in Composition of Dean Foods Board of Directors – On May 1, 2013, in connection with the WhiteWave spin-off discussed above, we announced the following changes to the composition of the Dean Foods Board of Directors, all of which were effective as of the conclusion of the May 1, 2013 Board of Directors meeting at which the distribution was approved:

 

   

Mr. Gregg L. Engles resigned as member and Chairman of the Board of Dean Foods, and Mr. Tom C. Davis, who has served as an independent director on our Board of Directors since 2001 and who served as our Lead Director in 2012, was named Chairman of the Board;

 

   

Messrs. Stephen L. Green and Joseph S. Hardin, Jr. and Ms. Doreen A. Wright resigned as members of our Board of Directors to continue in their service to the Board of Directors of WhiteWave; and

 

   

the composition of the committees of the Board were modified such that Mr. J. Wayne Mailloux will serve as chair of the Audit Committee, Mr. Jim L. Turner will chair the Compensation Committee, Mr. Gregg A. Tanner will serve as chair of the Executive Committee, and Mr. Hector M. Nevares will chair of the Governance Committee.

Divestiture of Morningstar Foods — On January 3, 2013 we completed the sale of our Morningstar division to a third party. Morningstar is a leading manufacturer of dairy and non-dairy extended shelf-life (“ESL”) and cultured products, including creams and creamers, ice cream mixes, whipping cream, aerosol whipped toppings, iced coffee, half and half, value-added milks, sour cream and cottage cheese. We received net proceeds of approximately $1.45 billion, a portion of which was used to retire outstanding debt under our senior secured credit facility. During the first quarter of 2013, we recorded a gain of $871.3 million ($492.2 million, net of tax) on the sale of Morningstar. All of the operations of our Morningstar division, previously reported within the Morningstar segment, have been reclassified as discontinued operations in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and as of December 31, 2012. See Note 3 and Note 6 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the Morningstar divestiture and the use of related proceeds.

Conventional Raw Milk Environment —Prices for conventional raw milk, our primary ingredient, were approximately 6% higher in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the year ago quarter but were 10% lower sequentially from the fourth quarter of 2012. We expect Class I pricing to trend higher during the latter part of the second quarter and remain slightly elevated through the second half of 2013.

Retail and Customer Environment — As conventional raw milk prices have fallen, retailers have restored the margin over milk (the difference between retail milk prices and raw milk costs) to be more consistent with historical averages, which is in contrast to 2010 and 2011, when retailers were deeply discounting private label milk. As a result, the price relationship between branded and private label milk has improved, our regional brand share has stabilized, and our regional brands have competed more effectively in recent quarters.

Over the course of 2013, we will continue to emphasize price realization, volume performance and disciplined cost management in an effort to improve gross margin and drive operating income growth. Organizational changes have been made to reduce our total cost to serve and our selling and general and administrative costs, and we remain focused on sustaining strong positive cash flow and generating shareholder value. Our focus on volume, cost and pricing effectiveness has yielded significantly improved results and renewed momentum within our ongoing Dean Foods business; however, the fluid milk industry remains highly competitive. In January 2013, a request for proposal (“RFP”) for private label milk with a significant customer resulted in a loss of a portion of that customer’s business, which will begin to be reflected in the second quarter of 2013. The lost volumes were primarily related to low-margin, private label fluid milk business and were the result of the renegotiation of certain regional supply arrangements that going forward will be subject to renewal over various time frames. As a result, we expect total fluid milk volumes to decline in the low-single digits in 2013. As discussed more fully below, we are accelerating our ongoing cost reduction efforts in 2013 to minimize the impact of these lost volumes.

Facility Closing and Reorganization Activities and Asset Impairment Charges —During the fourth quarter of 2012, our management team approved a plan to reorganize our field organization and certain functional areas that support our regional business teams, including finance, distribution, operations and human resources. We believe this streamlined leadership structure will enable faster decision-making and create enhanced opportunities to build our ongoing Dean Foods core dairy operations. During the first quarter of 2013, we recorded charges of $4.5 million, related to severance costs associated with this program. Additionally, we closed two of our core dairy production facilities during the first quarter of 2013. We are in the process of identifying opportunities for further cost reductions, and we expect to incur additional costs related to these efforts and other initiatives in the near term as we continue to optimize our network and transform our business. Specifically, we plan to build upon the success of the cost reduction actions undertaken in 2012 and intend to significantly accelerate those efforts throughout the remainder of 2013. Although these plans are still being developed and have not yet been approved by our executive management team, we expect the cost reductions to include the closure of 10-15% of our production facilities and the elimination of a significant number of distribution routes, as well as associated selling, general and administrative expenses.

 

40


Table of Contents

Additionally, as a result of certain changes to our business, including the loss of a portion of a significant customer’s volume and related plans for consolidating the production network for our core dairy operations, during the first quarter of 2013, we evaluated the impact that we expect these changes to have on our projected future cash flows. This analysis identified indicators of impairment at certain of our production facilities and therefore we were required to test the assets at those facilities for recoverability. The results of our analysis indicated an impairment of our plant, property and equipment of $27.5 million in our Ongoing Dean Foods segment, which we recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2013. We recorded additional impairment charges of $6.4 million related to the write-down of an indefinite-lived trademark and the write-off of a favorable lease asset, both of which were related to our Ongoing Dean Foods segment. We can provide no assurance that we will not have impairment charges in future periods as a result of changes in our business environment, operating results or the assumptions and estimates utilized in our impairment tests.

See Note 12 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our facility closing and reorganization activities and asset impairment charges.

Matters Affecting Comparability

Our discussion of the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 will be affected by the matters summarized below.

A portion of our WhiteWave products have historically been produced distributed and sold by our Ongoing Dean Foods segment. In the past, those sales, together with their related costs, were included in the WhiteWave segment for management and segment reporting purposes. From a cost perspective, the results of these transactions may not have been equivalent to the terms that would prevail in arm’s length transactions, and, as a result of the commercial agreements described below, this presentation is no longer consistent with the way our Chief Executive Officer, who is our chief operating decision maker, evaluates the performance of our segments. Accordingly, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2012, the results of these transactions were no longer included in the WhiteWave segment and are instead reflected in the Ongoing Dean Foods segment for management and segment reporting purposes.

Our reporting segments have not historically included an allocation of the expense related to share-based compensation or the costs related to previously shared services such as audit services, corporate development, human resources, strategy, tax or treasury. However, beginning in the first quarter of 2013, we have combined the results of our ongoing Dean Foods operations and the corporate items previously categorized as “Corporate and Other” into a single reportable segment, Ongoing Dean Foods, as all of our corporate activities now directly support the ongoing Dean Foods core dairy business. This change reflects the manner in which our Chief Executive Officer determines strategy and investment plans for our business given the changes to our operating structure as a result of the WhiteWave IPO and the Morningstar sale. WhiteWave’s corporate costs, including the expense related to share-based compensation, are now reported entirely within its segment results as presented below. All segment results herein have been recast to present results on a comparable basis. These changes had no impact on consolidated net sales and operating income.

Additionally, in connection with the WhiteWave IPO discussed in Note 2 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, our separate lines of businesses entered into agreements with each other that formalize, and in certain cases, modify ongoing commercial arrangements. These agreements became effective October 31, 2012. As described above, following their effectiveness and for so long as WhiteWave is consolidated for financial reporting purposes, these agreements will impact our intersegment sales and their related costs, but will be eliminated in consolidation. Upon completion of the spin-off of WhiteWave, these intersegment sales will become third-party sales that, along with their related costs, will no longer be eliminated in consolidation. Additionally, the stand-alone consolidated financial statements of WhiteWave will differ from our historically reported WhiteWave segment results, as our historical results include adjustments for management and segment reporting purposes. In addition, WhiteWave’s stand-alone consolidated financial statements include certain other adjustments, including the allocation of corporate and shared service costs, which are not reflected in the results by segment below.

 

41


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table presents certain information concerning our financial results, including information presented as a percentage of net sales.

 

     Three Months Ended March 31  
     2013     2012  
     Dollars      Percent     Dollars      Percent  
     (Dollars in millions)  

Net sales

   $ 2,878.8         100.0   $ 2,870.5         100.0

Cost of sales

     2,165.0         75.2        2,146.9         74.8   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Gross profit(1)

     713.8         24.8        723.6         25.2   

Operating costs and expenses:

          

Selling and distribution

     466.0         16.2        482.8         16.8   

General and administrative

     135.2         4.7        124.1         4.3   

Amortization of intangibles

     1.7         0.1        1.6         0.1   

Facility closing and reorganization costs

     5.6         0.2        25.4         0.9   

Impairment of long-lived assets

     33.9         1.2        —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total operating costs and expenses

     642.4         22.4        633.9         22.1   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total operating income

   $ 71.4         2.4   $ 89.7         3.1
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) As disclosed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we include certain shipping and handling costs within selling and distribution expense. As a result, our gross profit may not be comparable to other entities that present all shipping and handling costs as a component of cost of sales.

Quarter Ended March 31, 2013 Compared to Quarter Ended March 31, 2012 — Consolidated Results

Net Sales — Net sales by segment are shown in the table below.

 

     Three Months Ended March 31  
     2013      2012      $ Increase /
(Decrease)
    % Increase /
(Decrease)
 
     (Dollars in millions)  

Ongoing Dean Foods

   $ 2,292.5       $ 2,347.8       $ (55.3     (2.4 )% 

WhiteWave

     586.3         522.7         63.6        12.2   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

Total

   $ 2,878.8       $ 2,870.5       $ 8.3        0.3
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

The change in net sales was due to the following:

 

     Three Months ended March 31, 2013
vs Three Months ended March 31, 2012
 
     Volume     Pricing
and Product
Mix Changes
     Total
Increase / (Decrease)
 
     (Dollars in millions)  

Ongoing Dean Foods

   $ (86.2   $ 30.9       $ (55.3

WhiteWave

     62.8        0.8         63.6   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ (23.4   $ 31.7       $ 8.3   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated net sales increased $8.3 million, or 0.3%, during the first quarter of 2013, as compared to the first quarter of 2012, primarily due to volume growth in our WhiteWave segment as well as increased pricing as a result of higher dairy commodity costs. These increases were partially offset by volume declines in our Ongoing Dean Foods segment.

Cost of Sales — All expenses incurred to bring a product to completion are included in cost of sales, such as raw material, ingredient and packaging costs; labor costs; and plant and equipment costs. Cost of sales increased $18.1 million, or 0.8%, in the first quarter of 2013, from the first quarter of 2012, primarily due to higher commodity costs, partially offset by volume declines in our Dean Foods core dairy business.

 

42


Table of Contents

Operating Costs and Expenses — Operating expenses increased $8.5 million, or 1.3%, in the first quarter of 2013, as compared to the first quarter of 2012. Significant changes to operating costs and expenses include the following:

 

   

Selling and distribution costs decreased $16.8 million, driven by lower freight and personnel costs in our Ongoing Dean Foods segment, partially offset by increased freight and storage costs at WhiteWave due to higher sales volume.

 

   

General and administrative costs increased $11.1 million, driven by transition costs at WhiteWave, which were partially offset by headcount reductions and reduced incentive compensation.

 

   

Net facility closing and reorganization costs decreased $19.8 million. See Note 12 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding our facility closing and reorganization activities.

 

   

Impairment of long-lived assets increased $33.9 million. See Note 12 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other (Income) Expense — Excluding the $28 million charge recorded as a result of the termination of $1 billion notional amount of interest rate swaps discussed in Note 7 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, interest expense decreased by $9.1 million in the first quarter of 2013 from $45.5 million reported in the first quarter of 2012, primarily due to significantly lower average debt balances as a result of the repayments of the Dean Foods senior secured credit facility with proceeds from the Morningstar sale and the WhiteWave IPO. See Note 6 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding our debt repayments. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest expense related to outstanding borrowings under WhiteWave’s senior secured credit facility.

Income Taxes – Income tax expense was recorded at an effective rate of 50.4 % for the first three months of 2013 compared to 39.3% for the first three months of 2012. Generally, our effective tax rate varies primarily based on our profitability level and the relative earnings of our business units. In the first quarter of 2013, several minor state related charges combined with our low profitability level to drive up our tax rate.

Quarter Ended March 31, 2013 Compared to Quarter Ended March 31, 2012 — Results by Segment

We evaluate the performance of our segments based on sales and operating profit or loss before gains and losses on the sale of businesses, facility closing and reorganization costs, asset impairment charges, litigation settlements and foreign exchange gains and losses. Therefore, the measurement of segment operating income presented below is before such items.

Ongoing Dean Foods

The key performance indicators of our Ongoing Dean Foods segment are volume performance, brand mix and achieving low cost, which are realized within net sales, gross profit and operating income, respectively.

 

     Three Months Ended March 31  
     2013     2012  
     Dollars      Percent     Dollars      Percent  
     (Dollars in millions)  

Net sales

   $ 2,292.5         100.0   $ 2,347.8         100.0

Cost of sales

     1,797.2         78.4        1,816.6         77.4   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Gross profit

     495.3         21.6        531.2         22.6   

Operating costs and expenses

     426.4         18.6        463.0         19.7   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total segment operating income

   $ 68.9         3.0   $ 68.2         2.9
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net Sales — Net sales decreased $55.3 million, or 2.4%, during the first quarter of 2013 versus the first quarter of 2012 primarily due to a decrease in fresh milk volumes which account for approximately 79% of total volume within our ongoing Dean Foods core dairy business. We also experienced volume declines in our cultured dairy and ice cream products. These decreases were partially offset by increased pricing as a result of higher dairy commodity costs. We continue to focus on strengthening our volumes at margin-appropriate pricing levels. However, we expect our lower margin, private label volumes to underperform the broader industry for the balance of the year due to the loss of a portion of a significant customers’ business moving to other providers.

 

43


Table of Contents

Our core dairy business generally increases or decreases the prices of its fluid dairy products on a monthly basis in correlation to fluctuations in the costs of raw materials, packaging supplies and delivery costs. However, in some cases, we are competitively or contractually constrained with respect to the means and/or timing of price increases. This can have a negative impact on the segment’s profitability. The following table sets forth the average monthly Class I “mover” and its components, as well as the average monthly Class II minimum prices for raw skim milk and butterfat for the first quarter of 2013 compared to the first quarter of 2012:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31*  
     2013      2012      % Change  

Class I mover(1)

   $ 18.33       $ 17.38         5.5

Class I raw skim milk mover(1)(2)

     12.89         11.85         8.8   

Class I butterfat mover(2)(3)

     1.68         1.70         (1.2

Class II raw skim milk minimum(1)(4)

     13.07         11.83         10.5   

Class II butterfat minimum(3)(4)

     1.68         1.61         4.3   

 

* The prices noted in this table are not the prices that we actually pay. The federal order minimum prices applicable at any given location for Class I raw skim milk or Class I butterfat are based on the Class I mover prices plus a location differential. Class II prices noted in the table are federal minimum prices, applicable at all locations. Our actual cost also includes producer premiums, procurement costs and other related charges that vary by location and supplier. Please see “Part I — Item 1. Business — Government Regulation — Milk Industry Regulation” in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K and “— Known Trends and Uncertainties — Prices of Raw Milk and Other Inputs” below for a more complete description of raw milk pricing.
(1) Prices are per hundredweight.
(2) We process Class I raw skim milk and butterfat into fluid milk products.
(3) Prices are per pound.
(4) We process Class II raw skim milk and butterfat into products such as cottage cheese, creams and creamers, ice cream and sour cream.

Cost of Sales — All expenses incurred to bring a product to completion are included in cost of sales, such as raw material, ingredient and packaging costs; labor costs; and plant and equipment costs. Cost of sales decreased by 1.1% in the first quarter of 2013, primarily due to lower fresh fluid milk sales volumes as well as decreased repairs and maintenance costs which were partially offset by increased dairy commodity costs.

Gross Profit — Gross profit percentage decreased to 21.6% in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to 22.6% in the first quarter of 2012, primarily due to the decrease in sales volume partially offset by the effective price realization for increased dairy commodity costs.

Operating Costs and Expenses — Operating costs and expenses decreased by 7.9% in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the first quarter of 2012. Significant changes to operating costs and expenses include the following:

 

   

Selling and distribution costs decreased $23.7 million, driven by decreased freight costs, repairs and maintenance and marketing and promotion costs as well as lower personnel related costs due to headcount reductions.

 

   

General and administrative costs decreased $13.0 million due to headcount reductions during the first quarter of 2013 as well as other cost savings initiatives.

WhiteWave

The key performance indicators of WhiteWave are sales volumes, net sales dollars, gross profit and operating income.

 

     Three Months Ended March 31  
     2013     2012  
     Dollars      Percent     Dollars      Percent  
     (Dollars in millions)  

Net sales

   $ 586.3         100.0   $ 522.7         100.0

Cost of sales

     367.8         62.7        330.3         63.2   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Gross profit

     218.5         37.3        192.4         36.8   

Operating costs and expenses

     176.5         30.1        145.5         27.8   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total segment operating income

   $ 42.0         7.2   $ 46.9         9.0
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net Sales — Net sales increased $63.6 million, or 12.2%, in the first quarter of 2013 compared to the first quarter of 2012, primarily driven by volume growth across all product categories, particularly coffee creamers and beverages and plant-based foods and beverages due to strong category growth and innovation. Net sales were also enhanced by a favorable mix of products sold along with the impact of pricing actions that were implemented on premium dairy products late in the first quarter of 2012.

 

44


Table of Contents

Cost of Sales — Cost of sales increased 11.4% in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the first quarter of 2012. This increase was primarily driven by sales volume growth, higher raw materials input costs, particularly raw organic milk, and plant operations costs. These increases were partially offset by cost reduction initiatives.

Gross Profit — Gross profit percentage increased to 37.3% in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to 36.8% in the first quarter of 2012, driven by higher pricing and a favorable product mix which more than offset the impact of higher commodity costs.

Operating Costs and Expenses — Operating costs and expenses increased $31.0 million during the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the first quarter of 2012. General and administrative costs increased $24.1 million, driven by expenses incurred by the new WhiteWave corporate function which were not present in their segment results for the prior year. In addition, 2013 results include non-recurring costs comprised of share-based compensation expense related to IPO grants and costs incurred for the build-out of WhiteWave’s independent corporate structure. Selling and distribution costs increased $6.9 million as sales volume growth continued to drive capacity related issues including outside warehousing and related distribution costs.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We believe that our cash on hand, coupled with future cash flows from operations and other available sources of liquidity, including our amended and restated $1.0 billion senior secured revolving credit facility and our amended $550 million receivables-backed facility, and with respect to our WhiteWave segment, its senior secured credit facilities, together will provide sufficient liquidity to allow us to meet our cash requirements in the next twelve months. Further, we expect any future monetization of the WhiteWave shares that we intend to retain upon completion of the anticipated spin-off to provide an additional source of liquidity. Our anticipated uses of cash include capital expenditures, working capital, pension contributions, financial obligations, including tax payments, and certain other costs that may be necessary to execute our cost reduction initiatives. On an ongoing basis, we will evaluate and consider strategic acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, repurchasing shares of our common stock, instituting a cash dividend or other transactions to create shareholder value and enhance financial performance. Additionally, from time to time, we may repurchase our outstanding debt obligations in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. Such transactions may require cash expenditures or generate proceeds.

Additionally, since 1998, our Board of Directors has from time to time authorized the repurchase of our common stock up to an aggregate of $2.3 billion, excluding fees and expenses. We made no share repurchases during the quarter ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As of March 31, 2013, $218.7 million was available for repurchases under this program (excluding fees and commissions). Management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market transactions at prevailing prices or in privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions and other factors. Shares, when repurchased, are retired.

As of March 31, 2013, $64.3 million of our total cash on hand of $76.4 million was attributable to our foreign operations, of which $55.6 million was specifically related to WhiteWave’s foreign operations. We currently anticipate that the cash attributable to our foreign operations will remain in those foreign jurisdictions.

On January 3, 2013, we completed the sale of our Morningstar division and used a portion of the proceeds for the full repayment of $480 million of 2016 Tranche B term loan borrowings, $547 million of 2017 Tranche B term loan borrowings and $265 million of revolver borrowings that were outstanding under the Dean Foods senior secured credit facility as of December 31, 2012.

At March 31, 2013, we had $1.8 billion of outstanding debt obligations, of which approximately $744 million was related to WhiteWave’s senior secured credit facilities. We had total cash on hand of $76.4 million and an additional $1.3 billion of combined available future borrowing capacity under our senior secured revolving credit facility and receivables-backed facility, subject to compliance with the covenants in our credit agreements. Additionally, WhiteWave had available future borrowing capacity under its $850 million senior secured revolving credit facility of approximately $602 million as of March 31, 2013, which amount will vary over time depending on WhiteWave’s financial covenants and operating performance. Based on our current expectations, we believe our liquidity and capital resources will be sufficient to operate our business. However, we may, from time to time, raise additional funds through borrowings or public or private sales of debt or equity securities, including any shares of WhiteWave that we retain. The amount, nature and timing of any borrowings or sales of debt or equity securities will depend on our operating performance and other circumstances; our then-current commitments and obligations; the amount, nature and timing of our capital requirements; any limitations imposed by our current credit arrangements; and overall market conditions.

Our credit agreement permits us to complete acquisitions that meet all of the following conditions without obtaining prior approval: (1) the acquired company is involved in the manufacture, processing and distribution of food or packaging products or any other line of business in which we were engaged as of April 2007, (2) the net cash purchase price for any single acquisition is not greater than $500 million and not greater than $100 million if our leverage ratio is greater than 4.50 times consolidated EBITDA (as defined in our credit agreement) on a pro-forma basis, (3) we acquire at least 51% of the acquired entity, (4) the transaction is approved by the board of directors or shareholders, as appropriate, of the target and (5) after giving effect to such acquisition on a pro-forma basis, we would have been in compliance with all financial covenants. All other acquisitions must be approved in advance by the required lenders.

 

45


Table of Contents

The senior secured credit facility contains limitations on liens, investments and the incurrence of additional indebtedness, prohibits certain dispositions of property and restricts certain payments, including dividends. There are no restrictions on these certain payments, including dividends, when our leverage ratio is below 4.50 times on a pro-forma basis. The senior secured credit facility is secured by liens on substantially all of our domestic assets, including the assets of our domestic subsidiaries, but excluding all assets of WhiteWave and its subsidiaries, the capital stock of subsidiaries of the former Dean Foods Company (“Legacy Dean”) and the capital stock of WhiteWave and its subsidiaries, the real property owned by Legacy Dean and its subsidiaries, and accounts receivable associated with the receivables-backed facility. In connection with the WhiteWave IPO, WhiteWave and its subsidiaries have been released from their obligations as guarantors of Dean Foods’ senior secured credit facility and designated as unrestricted subsidiaries thereunder.

Under the senior secured credit facility and our receivables-backed facility, we are required to comply with certain financial covenants, including, but not limited to, maximum leverage, maximum senior secured leverage and minimum interest coverage ratios, each as defined under and calculated in accordance with the terms of the agreements governing our senior secured credit facility and our receivables-backed facility. Our leverage ratio at March 31, 2013 was 2.13 times consolidated funded indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA for the prior four consecutive quarters. The maximum permitted leverage ratio of consolidated funded indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA for the prior four consecutive quarters was 5.25 times as of March 31, 2013, with an additional decrease to 4.50 times as of September 30, 2013 and thereafter. As described in more detail in our amended and restated credit agreement, the leverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of consolidated funded indebtedness, less cash up to $100 million to the extent held by us and our restricted subsidiaries, to consolidated EBITDA for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ended on the measurement date. Consolidated funded indebtedness is comprised of our outstanding indebtedness and the outstanding indebtedness of certain of our subsidiaries, excluding our unrestricted subsidiaries. Consolidated EBITDA is comprised of net income for us and our restricted subsidiaries plus interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization expense and certain other non-cash expenses, and add-backs resulting from acquisition-related non-recurring charges incurred by us or certain of our subsidiaries and is calculated on a pro-forma basis to give effect to any acquisitions, divestitures or relevant changes in our composition or the composition of certain of our subsidiaries. In addition, the calculation of consolidated EBITDA may include adjustments related to other charges reasonably acceptable to the administrative agent.

Our senior secured leverage ratio at March 31, 2013 was 0.03 times consolidated funded senior secured indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA for the prior four consecutive quarters. The maximum permitted senior secured leverage ratio of consolidated funded senior secured indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA for the prior four consecutive quarters allowed was 3.50 times as of March 31, 2013. This ratio is calculated as the ratio of consolidated funded senior secured indebtedness, less cash up to $100 million to the extent held by us and our restricted subsidiaries, to consolidated EBITDA for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ended on the measurement date. Consolidated funded senior secured indebtedness is comprised of our outstanding senior secured indebtedness and the outstanding senior secured indebtedness of certain of our subsidiaries, excluding our unrestricted subsidiaries. Consolidated EBITDA is calculated as described above in the discussion of our leverage ratio.

Our interest coverage ratio at March 31, 2013 was 3.73 times consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense for the prior four consecutive quarters. The minimum permitted interest coverage ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense for the prior four consecutive quarters was 3.00 times as of March 31, 2013. This ratio is calculated as the ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ended on the measurement date. Consolidated EBITDA is calculated as described above in the discussion of our leverage ratio. Consolidated interest expense is comprised of consolidated interest expense paid or payable in cash by us and our restricted subsidiaries, as calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, but excluding non-cash losses from foreign exchange translations or swap agreements and third party fees and expenses related to acquisitions, investments, dispositions and the incurrence or early extinguishment of indebtedness.

The credit agreement contains standard default triggers, including without limitation: failure to maintain compliance with the financial and other covenants contained in the credit agreement, default on certain of our other debt, a change in control and certain other material adverse changes in our business. The credit agreement does not contain any requirements to maintain specific credit rating levels.

As of April 26, 2013, there were outstanding borrowings of $63.0 million under our senior secured revolving credit facility, excluding letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $1.0 million that were issued but undrawn.

We are currently in compliance with all covenants in our credit agreements, and we expect to maintain such compliance for the foreseeable future.

 

46


Table of Contents

At March 31, 2013, $976.1 million was available under the senior secured revolving credit facility, with $313.5 million also available under the receivables-backed facility, subject to compliance with the covenants in our credit agreements. Availability under the senior secured revolving credit facility is calculated using the total commitment amount less current borrowings and issued and outstanding letters of credit. Availability under the receivables-backed facility is calculated using the current receivables balance for the seller entities, less adjustments for customer concentration limits, reserve requirements, and other adjustments as described in the amended and restated receivables repurchase agreement, not to exceed the total commitment amount less current borrowings and outstanding letters of credit.

WhiteWave Senior Secured Credit Facilities  — At March 31, 2013 WhiteWave’s senior secured credit facility consisted of a five-year $850 million revolving credit facility, a five-year $250 million term loan A-1 and a seven-year $250 million term loan A-2. The revolving credit facilities will be available for the issuance of up to $75 million of letters of credit and up to $75 million of swing line loans.

As of March 31, 2013, WhiteWave had outstanding borrowings of approximately $744 million under its $1.35 billion senior secured credit facilities, of which $496 million consisted of term loan borrowings and $248 million consisted of borrowings under the $850 million revolving portion of its senior secured credit facilities. In addition, WhiteWave had additional borrowing capacity of approximately $602 million under its senior secured credit facilities, which amount will vary over time depending on WhiteWave’s financial covenants and operating performance.

Under the senior secured credit facility White Wave is required to comply with certain financial covenants, including, but not limited to; (a) a maximum consolidated net leverage ratio initially set at 4.25 to 1.00 and stepping down to 4.00 to 1.00 beginning March 31, 2014 and then to 3.75 to 1.00 beginning March 31, 2015 and thereafter (subject to WhiteWave’s right to increase such ratio by 0.50 to 1.00, but not to exceed 4.50 to 1.00, for the next four fiscal quarters following any permitted acquisition for which the purchase consideration equals or exceeds $50 million) and (b) a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio set at 3.00 to 1.00.

WhiteWave’s senior secured credit facilities are secured by security interests and liens on substantially all of its assets and the assets of its material domestic subsidiaries. Dean Foods does not guarantee WhiteWave’s senior secured credit facilities. The senior secured credit facilities are guaranteed by its material domestic subsidiaries. Borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities currently bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.75% per annum or, in the case of the $250 million term loan A-2 facility, LIBOR plus 2.00% per annum, and are subject to adjustment based on WhiteWave’s consolidated net leverage ratio.

Historical Cash Flow

The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows includes amounts related to discontinued operations, which are primarily related to proceeds received from the sale of our Morningstar division, which was completed on January 3, 2013 and which has been reclassified as a discontinued operation for all periods presented. See Note 3 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our discontinued operations.

The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31  
     2013     2012     Change  
     (In thousands)  

Net cash flows from continuing operations:

      

Operating activities

   $ (109,479   $ 13,836      $ (123,315

Investing activities

     (34,884     (36,025     1,141   

Financing activities

     (1,306,893     46,134        (1,353,027

Discontinued operations

     1,450,530        (11,095     1,461,625   

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     (1,839     3,358        (5,197
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   $ (2,565   $ 16,208      $ (18,773
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $109.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $13.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The change was primarily due to working capital changes, including an increase in trade accounts receivable, inventory builds and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses driven by the payment of our 2012 incentive plans and payments for raw milk. Operating cash flows during the first three months of 2013 were also impacted by the $28 million cash termination of our remaining Dean Foods interest rate hedges, which is described more fully in Note 7 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

47


Table of Contents

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities decreased modestly in the first quarter of 2013 in comparison to the first quarter of 2012 due to lower capital expenditures of $3.3 million, partially offset by insurance proceeds of approximately $3 million received during the first quarter of 2012.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities increased $1.35 billion in the first quarter of 2013 in comparison to the year-ago period, driven by net debt repayments of $1.3 billion in the first quarter of 2013 utilizing proceeds received from the sale of our Morningstar division versus net borrowings of $48.1 million in 2012. See Note 3 to our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the Morningstar sale.

Contractual Obligations

Except as discussed below, there have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of business to the information provided with respect to our contractual obligations, including indebtedness and purchase and lease obligations, as disclosed in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

On January 3, 2013, we completed the sale of our Morningstar division and used a portion of the proceeds for the full repayment of $480 million of 2016 Tranche B term loan borrowings, $547 million of 2017 Tranche B term loan borrowings and $265 million of revolver borrowings that were outstanding under the Dean Foods senior secured credit facility as of December 31, 2012. We expect these repayments to reduce the future interest payments reported in the contractual obligations table included in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K by approximately $209 million. Additionally, related to these debt repayments, on January 4, 2013 we terminated our remaining Dean Foods interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $1 billion and made a cash payment of $28 million to the counterparties to the swap agreements, which represented the fair value of the swaps as of the termination date. Accordingly, we will not incur any cash interest payments on these swaps going forward.

Additionally, as a result of the gain recognized on the sale of Morningstar, we incurred a cash tax obligation of approximately $430 million, which we expect to pay over the remainder of 2013. We intend to fund these payments through one or more of our existing sources of liquidity, including the Dean Foods senior secured revolving credit facility and the receivables-backed facility, or through other corporate transactions.

See Notes 3, 6 and 7 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the Morningstar sale, debt repayments and interest rate swap terminations, respectively.

Other Long-Term Liabilities

We offer pension benefits through various defined benefit pension plans and also offer certain health care and life insurance benefits to eligible employees and their eligible dependents upon the retirement of such employees. Reported costs of providing non-contributory defined pension benefits and other postretirement benefits are dependent upon numerous factors, assumptions and estimates. For example, these costs are impacted by actual employee demographics (including age, compensation levels and employment periods), the level of contributions made to the plan and earnings on plan assets. Pension and postretirement costs also may be significantly affected by changes in key actuarial assumptions, including anticipated rates of return on plan assets and the discount rates used in determining the projected benefit obligation and annual periodic pension costs.

We expect to contribute approximately $13 million to the pension plans and approximately $3 million to the postretirement health plans in 2013.

Other Commitments and Contingencies

On December 21, 2001, in connection with our acquisition of Legacy Dean, we purchased Dairy Farmers of America’s (“DFA”) 33.8% interest in our operations. In connection with that transaction, we issued a contingent, subordinated promissory note to DFA in the original principal amount of $40 million. The promissory note has a 20-year term that bears interest based on the consumer price index. Interest will not be paid in cash but will be added to the principal amount of the note annually, up to a maximum principal amount of $96 million. We may prepay the note in whole or in part at any time, without penalty. The note will only become payable if we materially breach or terminate one of our related milk supply agreements with DFA without renewal or replacement. Otherwise, the note will expire in 2021, without any obligation to pay any portion of the principal or interest. Payments made under the note, if any, would be expensed as incurred. We have not terminated, and we have not materially breached, any of our related milk supply agreements with DFA related to the promissory note. We have previously terminated unrelated supply agreements with respect to several plants that were supplied by DFA. In connection with our goals of accelerated cost control and increased supply chain efficiency, we continue to evaluate our sources of raw milk supply.

 

48


Table of Contents

We also have the following commitments and contingent liabilities, in addition to contingent liabilities related to ordinary course litigation, investigations and audits:

 

   

certain indemnification obligations related to businesses that we have divested;

 

   

certain lease obligations, which require us to guarantee the minimum value of the leased asset at the end of the lease;

 

   

selected levels of property and casualty risks, primarily related to employee health care, workers’ compensation claims and other casualty losses; and

 

   

certain litigation-related contingencies.

See Note 13 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our commitments and contingent obligations, including our litigation contingencies.

Future Capital Requirements

During 2013, we intend to invest a total of approximately $150 million to $175 million in capital expenditures primarily for our existing manufacturing facilities and distribution capabilities for the ongoing Dean Foods business. We expect cash interest to be approximately $95 million to $100 million based upon current debt levels and projected forward interest rates under our senior secured credit facility. Cash interest excludes amortization of deferred financing fees and bond discounts of approximately $13 million and imputed interest of approximately $2 million related to the Tennessee dairy farmer action litigation settlement reached in 2012.

WhiteWave has indicated that it expects to invest approximately $150 million to $160 million in capital expenditures in 2013, primarily to increase manufacturing and warehousing capacity to support its growth. Additionally, WhiteWave expects cash interest to be approximately $18 million to $20 million, which excludes amortization of deferred financing fees of approximately $2 million.

The portion of our long-term debt due within the next 12 months totals $15.0 million, all of which is attributable to WhiteWave. From time to time, we may repurchase our outstanding debt obligations in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, subject to meeting certain terms and conditions as outlined in our credit agreements. We expect that cash flow from operations and borrowings under our senior secured credit facility and receivables-backed facility will be sufficient to meet our future capital requirements for the foreseeable future.

Known Trends and Uncertainties

Prices of Raw Milk and Other Inputs

Conventional Raw Milk and Butterfat — The primary raw materials used in the products manufactured, distributed and sold by our Ongoing Dean Foods core dairy business are conventional milk (which contains both raw milk and butterfat) and bulk cream. On a monthly basis, the federal government and certain state governments set minimum prices for raw milk. The regulated minimum prices differ based on how the raw milk is utilized. Raw milk processed into fluid milk is priced at the Class I price and raw milk processed into products such as cottage cheese, creams and creamers, ice cream and sour cream is priced at the Class II price. Generally, we pay the federal minimum prices for raw milk, plus certain producer premiums (or “over-order” premiums) and location differentials. We also incur other raw milk procurement costs in some locations (such as hauling, field personnel, etc.). A change in the federal minimum price does not necessarily mean an identical change in our total raw milk costs as over-order premiums may increase or decrease. This relationship is different in every region of the country and sometimes within a region based on supplier arrangements. However, in general, the overall change in our raw milk costs can be linked to the change in federal minimum prices. Because our Class II products typically have a higher fat content than that contained in raw milk, we also purchase bulk cream for use in some of our Class II products. Bulk cream is typically purchased based on a multiple of the Grade AA butter price on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”).

In general, we change the prices charged for Class I dairy products on a monthly basis, as the costs of raw materials, packaging, fuel and other materials fluctuate. Prices for certain Class II products are also changed monthly, while others are changed from time to time as circumstances warrant. However, there can be a lag between the timing of a raw material cost change and a corresponding price change to our customers, especially in the case of Class II butterfat because Class II butterfat prices for each month are not announced by the government until after the end of that month. Additionally, in some cases, primarily with respect to diesel fuel and other non-dairy inputs, we are subject to the terms of sales agreements with respect to the implementation of price changes. This can have a negative impact on our profitability and can cause volatility in our earnings. Our sales and operating profit margin fluctuate with the price of our raw materials and other inputs.

 

49


Table of Contents

Conventional milk prices increased during the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the prior year quarter but were 10% lower sequentially from the fourth quarter of 2012. Raw skim milk prices continue to be higher than the historical average. We expect Class I and Class II pricing to trend higher during the latter part of the second quarter through the second half of 2013 but will remain within manageable levels. The increase in pricing can be attributed in part to lower milk production forecasts for 2013.

Organic Raw Milk — The primary raw material used in WhiteWave’s organic milk-based products is organic raw milk. WhiteWave generally enters into supply agreements with organic dairy farmers with typical terms of two to five years, which obligate WhiteWave to purchase certain minimum quantities of organic raw milk. The dairy industry continues to experience periodic imbalances between supply and demand for organic raw milk. Industry regulation and the costs of organic farming compared to costs of conventional farming can impact the supply of organic raw milk in the market. Oversupply levels of organic raw milk can increase competitive pressure on WhiteWave’s products, while supply shortages can cause product shortages and higher costs to WhiteWave. WhiteWave continues to take proactive steps to manage its organic raw milk supply to ensure it is able to maintain its leading position in the premium dairy category.

Soybeans and Almonds — The primary raw materials used in WhiteWave’s plant-based products are non–Genetically Modified Organism (“non-GMO”) soybeans, organic soybeans and almonds. In 2011, WhiteWave committed to using only soybeans that have been certified as non-GMO by an independent party in its non-organic products. Both soybeans and almonds are generally available from several suppliers and WhiteWave is not dependent on any single supplier for these raw materials.

Fuel and Resin Costs — We purchase diesel fuel to operate the extensive DSD system for our Dean Foods core dairy business, and we incur fuel surcharge expense related to the products we deliver through third-party carriers. WhiteWave primarily relies on third-party carriers for product distribution, and the transportation agreements typically adjust for movement in diesel prices. Although we may utilize forward purchase contracts and other instruments to mitigate the risks related to commodity price fluctuations, such strategies do not fully mitigate commodity price risk. Adverse movements in commodity prices over the terms of the contracts or instruments could decrease the economic benefits we derive from these strategies.

Another significant raw material used by our ongoing Dean Foods core dairy business is resin, which is a fossil fuel based product used to make plastic bottles. We purchase approximately 28 million pounds of resin and bottles per month. The prices of diesel and resin are subject to fluctuations based on changes in crude oil and natural gas prices. We expect that fuel and resin costs will remain elevated throughout 2013.

Retail and Customer Environment

Due in part to the current economic climate, which continues to be challenging for broad segments of the population, and historically high retail prices, the fluid milk category has posted declining volumes over the last several years. In addition, the industry experienced retail and wholesale margin erosion in 2010 and 2011, as conventional milk prices increased steadily in recent years; however, during the fourth quarter of 2011, milk prices decreased slightly and continued to decline through the first half of 2012. As conventional raw milk prices have fallen, retailers have restored the margin over milk (the difference between retail milk prices and raw milk costs) to be more consistent with historical averages, which is in contrast to 2010 and 2011, when retailers were deeply discounting private label milk. As a result, the price relationship between branded and private label milk has improved, our regional brand share has stabilized, and our regional brands have competed more effectively during 2012 through the first quarter of 2013. Raw milk prices rose significantly during the second half of 2012 before decreasing slightly during the first quarter of 2013 but still remain higher as compared to the year ago quarter. However, we were able to effectively adjust our pricing to offset these costs.

Over the course of 2013, we will continue to emphasize price realization, volume performance and disciplined cost management in an effort to improve gross margin and drive operating income growth. Organizational changes have been made to reduce our total cost to serve and our selling and general and administrative costs, and we remain focused on sustaining strong positive cash flow and generating shareholder value. Our focus on volume, cost and pricing effectiveness has yielded significantly improved results and renewed momentum within the ongoing Dean Foods business; however, the fluid milk industry remains highly competitive. In January 2013, an RFP for private label milk with a significant customer resulted in a loss of a portion of that customer’s business which will begin to be reflected in the second quarter of 2013. The lost volumes were primarily related to low-margin, private label business and resulted from the renegotiation of certain regional supply arrangements that going forward will be subject to renewal over various time frames. As a result, we expect total fluid milk volumes to decline in the low-single digits in 2013. We have accelerated our ongoing cost reduction efforts in 2013 to minimize the impact of these lost volumes.

 

50


Table of Contents

Tax Rate

Income tax expense was recorded at an effective rate of 50.4% in the first three months of 2013 compared to 39.3% in the first three months of 2012. Changes in the relative profitability of our operating segments, as well as changes to federal, state, and foreign tax laws, may cause the rate to change from historical rates.

See “Part I — Item 1A — Risk Factors” in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of various other risks and uncertainties concerning our business.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There have been no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk as provided in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Controls Evaluation and Related Certifications

We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act, referred to herein as “Disclosure Controls”) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. The controls evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO). Based upon our most recent controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our Disclosure Controls were effective as of March 31, 2013.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the period covered by this quarterly report, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

51


Table of Contents

Part II — Other Information

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Tennessee Retailer and Indirect Purchaser Actions

A putative class action antitrust complaint (the “retailer action”) was filed on August 9, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. Plaintiffs allege generally that we, either acting alone or in conjunction with others in the milk industry who are also defendants in the retailer action, lessened competition in the Southeastern United States for the sale of processed fluid Grade A milk to retail outlets and other customers, and that the defendants’ conduct also artificially inflated wholesale prices for direct milk purchasers. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in the retailer action was granted in part and denied in part in August 2010. Defendants filed a motion for reconsideration on September 10, 2010, and filed a supplemental motion for summary judgment as to the remaining claims on September 27, 2010. On March 27, 2012, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants as to all remaining counts and entered judgment in favor of all defendants, including the Company. Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on April 25, 2012. On May 30, 2012, the Company participated in a scheduling conference and mediation conducted by the appeals court. The mediation did not result in a settlement agreement. Briefing on the appeal was completed on April 5, 2013. The appeals court has not set a date for oral argument at this time.

On June 29, 2009, another putative class action lawsuit was filed in the Eastern District of Tennessee, Greeneville Division, on behalf of indirect purchasers of processed fluid Grade A milk (the “indirect purchaser action”). The allegations in this complaint are similar to those in the retailer action, but primarily involve state law claims. Because the allegations in the indirect purchaser action substantially overlap with the allegations in the retailer action, the Court granted the parties’ joint motion to stay all proceedings in the indirect purchaser action pending the outcome of the summary judgment motions in the retailer action. On August 16, 2012, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their lawsuit. On January 17, 2013, these same plaintiffs filed a new lawsuit in the Eastern District of Tennessee, Greeneville Division, on behalf of a putative class of indirect purchasers of processed fluid Grade A milk (the “2013 indirect purchaser action”). The allegations are similar to those in the voluntarily dismissed indirect purchaser action, but involve only claims arising under Tennessee law. The Company filed a motion to dismiss on April 30, 2013.

Other than the material pending legal proceedings set forth above, we are party from time to time to certain claims, litigations, audits and investigations. Potential liabilities associated with the other matters referred to in this paragraph are not expected to have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

At this time, it is not possible for us to predict the ultimate outcome of the matters set forth within this section.

Other

We are in varying stages of discussion with numerous states to determine whether we have complied with state unclaimed property laws. Most, but not all, of these states have appointed an agent to conduct an examination of our books and records. In addition to seeking remittance of unclaimed property, some states may also seek interest and penalties. We do not expect the ultimate outcomes of these examinations to have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we reported that WhiteWave’s Mt. Crawford, VA plant experienced several discharges of pH and biochemical oxygen demand limitations in excess of the plant’s waste water discharge permit. We also reported that the Harrisonburg-Rockingham Regional Sewer Authority (“HRRSA”) had sent WhiteWave Notices of Violation citing violations of the waste water discharge permit and assessing WhiteWave a $100,000 civil penalty, and that WhiteWave had submitted a corrective action plan to the HRRSA and were in discussions with them regarding a conditional suspension of 90% of the civil penalty. On April 2, 2013, WhiteWave and the HRRSA signed a Consent Order resolving the matter. The Consent Order incorporated a corrective action plan and provided that WhiteWave would pay to the HRSSA (i) approximately $390,000 to cover water treatment costs and other expenses, and (ii) $10,000, which is 10% of the assessed civil penalty. The remaining 90% of the civil penalty assessed by the HRSSA has been suspended and will be withdrawn upon the condition that there are no additional material permit violations at the Mt. Crawford, VA plant through December 31, 2013.

 

52


Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits

 

10.1    Dean Foods Company 2013 Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 21, 2013).
10.2    Amendment No. 17 to Fifth Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement and Reaffirmation of Performance Undertaking, dated March 8, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 14, 2013.
10.3    Amended and Restated Tax Matters Agreement, dated May 1, 2013, between Dean Foods Company and The WhiteWave Foods Company (filed herewith).
31.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
31.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
99    Supplemental Financial Information for Dean Holding Company (filed herewith).

101.INS XBRL Instance Document(1).

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document(1).

101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document(1).

101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document(1).

101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document(1).

101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document(1).

 

(1) Submitted electronically herewith.

 

53


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

DEAN FOODS COMPANY

/ S / S COTT K. V OPNI

Scott K. Vopni
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

May 9, 2013

 

54

EXHIBIT 10.3

AMENDED AND RESTATED

TAX MATTERS AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED TAX MATTERS AGREEMENT (this “ Agreement ”) dated as of May 1, 2013 is made and entered into by Dean Foods Company, a Delaware corporation (“ Dean Foods ”), on behalf of itself and the Dean Foods Affiliates (as defined below), and The WhiteWave Foods Company, a Delaware corporation (“ WhiteWave ”), on behalf of itself and the WhiteWave Affiliates (as defined below).

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Dean Foods has determined that it would be appropriate, desirable, and in the best interests of Dean Foods and Dean Foods’ shareholders to completely separate the WhiteWave Business (as defined below) from Dean Foods;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement by and between Dean Foods and WhiteWave dated October 25, 2012 (the “ Separation and Distribution Agreement ”), effective as of October 25, 2012, Dean Foods has contributed, or caused the Dean Foods Affiliates to contribute, and WhiteWave has received and assumed, the assets and liabilities associated with the WhiteWave Business;

WHEREAS, Dean Foods is the common parent corporation of an “affiliated group” of corporations within the meaning of Section 1504(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “ Code ”) and of certain combined groups as defined under similar laws of other jurisdictions and WhiteWave and the WhiteWave Affiliates are, as of the date hereof, and have been, members of such groups;

WHEREAS, the groups of which Dean Foods is the common parent and WhiteWave and the WhiteWave Affiliates are members file and/or intend to file Consolidated Returns and Combined Returns (each as defined below);

WHEREAS, Dean Foods and WhiteWave contemplate that WhiteWave shall close the IPO (as defined in the Separation and Distribution Agreement);

WHEREAS, Dean Foods intends, after the IPO, to make a distribution of shares of WhiteWave Common Stock pro rata to the holders of Dean Foods capital stock in a transaction that is intended to qualify as a tax-free distribution under Sections 355 and 361(c) of the Code (the “ Distribution ”);

WHEREAS, pursuant to the transactions contemplated by the Separation and Distribution Agreement (the “ Transactions ”), WhiteWave and the WhiteWave Affiliates will cease to be members of the Consolidated Group (as defined below) and Combined Groups (as defined below);

WHEREAS, Dean Foods and WhiteWave desire to set forth their agreement regarding the allocation of Taxes (as defined below), the filing of Tax Returns (as defined below), the administration of Audits (as defined below) and other related matters;


WHEREAS, on October 25, 2012, Dean Foods and WhiteWave entered into a Tax Matters Agreement (the “Original Agreement”), and Dean Foods and WhiteWave desire to amend and restate the Original Agreement in its entirety as set forth herein

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby amend and restate the Original Agreement in its entirety as follows:

ARTICLE 1

DEFINITIONS OF TERMS

For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms have the following meanings, and capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Separation and Distribution Agreement:

Aggregate WhiteWave Group Combined Tax Liability ” means, with respect to any taxable period, the sum of the WhiteWave Group Combined Tax Liability for each Combined Return for such taxable period.

Applicable Percentage ” means (i) while the Dean Foods Group continues to own WhiteWave Common Stock, twenty percent (20%) minus the percentage of WhiteWave Common Stock issued in the IPO and (ii) after the Dean Foods Group has disposed of all of the WhiteWave Common Stock owned by it, forty percent (40%) minus the sum of (x) the percentage of WhiteWave Common Stock issued in the IPO and (y) the percentage of WhiteWave Common Stock disposed of by the Dean Foods Group in any transfers permitted under Section 4.6 of the Separation and Distribution Agreement (other than an Exempt Transfer). The Applicable Percentage shall be determined under the principles of Section 355(e) of the Code.

Audit ” includes any audit, assessment of Taxes, other examination by any Tax Authority, proceeding, or appeal of such proceeding relating to Taxes, whether administrative or judicial.

Combined Group ” means a group of corporations or other entities that files a Combined Return.

Combined Return ” means any Tax Return with respect to Non-Federal Taxes filed on a consolidated, combined (including nexus combination, worldwide combination, domestic combination, line of business combination or any other form of combination) or unitary basis wherein one or more members of the WhiteWave Group join in the filing of a Tax Return with Dean Foods or a Dean Foods Affiliate that is not also a member of the WhiteWave Group.

Consolidated Group ” means the affiliated group of corporations within the meaning of Section 1504(a) of the Code of which Dean Foods is the common parent and which includes the WhiteWave Group.

 

2


Consolidated Return ” means any Tax Return with respect to Federal Income Taxes filed by the Consolidated Group pursuant to Section 1501 of the Code.

Dean Foods Affiliate ” means any corporation or other entity, including any entity that is disregarded for federal income tax purposes, directly or indirectly “controlled” by Dean Foods where “control” means the ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the ownership interests of such corporation or other entity (by vote or value) or the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of such corporation or other entity, but at all times excluding WhiteWave and any WhiteWave Affiliate.

Dean Foods Business ” means all of the businesses and operations conducted by Dean Foods and Dean Foods Affiliates, excluding the WhiteWave Business, at any time, whether prior to, or after the date of the IPO.

Dean Foods Group ” means Dean Foods and each other Dean Foods Affiliate.

Deconsolidation ” means any event pursuant to which WhiteWave and the WhiteWave Group cease to be includible in either the Consolidated Group or any Combined Group, as the context requires.

Deconsolidation Date ” means the close of business on the day on which a Deconsolidation occurs.

Distribution ” shall have the meaning set forth in the Recitals.

Distribution Taxes ” means any (a) Taxes imposed on, or increase in Taxes incurred by, Dean Foods or any Dean Foods Affiliate and (b) any Taxes of a Dean Foods shareholder (or former Dean Foods shareholder) that are required to be paid or reimbursed by Dean Foods or any Dean Foods Affiliate pursuant to a legal determination, in either (a) or (b), resulting from, or arising in connection with, the failure of the Distribution to qualify as a tax-free transaction under Section 355 of the Code (including, without limitation, any Tax resulting from the application of Section 355(d) or Section 355(e) of the Code to the Distribution) or corresponding provisions of the laws of any other jurisdictions. Any Tax referred to in the immediately preceding sentence shall be determined using the highest applicable statutory Tax rate for the relevant taxable period (or portion thereof).

Estimated Tax Installment Date ” means the installment due dates prescribed in Section 6655(c) of the Code (presently April 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15).

Exempt Transfer ” means (i) any transfer in a Distribution or (ii) any transfer to another member of the Dean Foods Group.

Federal Income Tax ” or “ Federal Income Taxes ” means any Tax imposed under Subtitle A of the Code (including the Taxes imposed by Sections 11, 55, 59A, and 1201(a) of the Code), and any other income based United States Federal Tax which is hereinafter imposed upon corporations.

 

3


Federal Tax ” means any Tax imposed under the Code or otherwise under United States federal Tax law.

Final Determination ” means (a) the final resolution of any Tax (or other matter) for a taxable period, including any related interest or penalties, that, under applicable law, is not subject to further appeal, review or modification through proceedings or otherwise, including (1) by the expiration of a statute of limitations (giving effect to any extension, waiver or mitigation thereof) or a period for the filing of claims for refunds, amended returns, appeals from adverse determinations, or recovering any refund (including by offset), (2) by a decision, judgment, decree, or other order by a court of competent jurisdiction, which has become final and unappealable, (3) by a closing agreement or an accepted offer in compromise under Section 7121 or 7122 of the Code, or comparable agreements under laws of other jurisdictions, (4) by execution of an IRS Form 870-AD, or by a comparable form under the laws of other jurisdictions (excluding, however, any such form that reserves (whether by its terms or by operation of law) the right of the taxpayer to file a claim for refund and/or the right of the Tax Authority to assert a further deficiency), or (5) by any allowance of a refund or credit, but only after the expiration of all periods during which such refund or credit may be recovered (including by way of offset) or (b) the payment of Tax by any member of the Consolidated Group or Combined Group with respect to any item disallowed or adjusted by a Tax Authority provided that Dean Foods determines that no action should be taken to recoup such payment.

IRS ” means the Internal Revenue Service.

Loss ” means any loss, cost, fine, penalty, fee, damage, obligation, liability, payment in settlement, or other expense of any kind, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, but excluding any consequential, special, punitive or exemplary damages.

Non-Federal Combined Taxes ” means any Non-Federal Taxes with respect to which a Combined Return is filed.

Non-Federal Separate Taxes ” means any Non-Federal Taxes that are not Non-Federal Combined Taxes.

Non-Federal Taxes ” means any Tax other than a Federal Tax.

Option Issuances ” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.2(c) of this Agreement.

Post-Deconsolidation Period ” means a taxable period beginning after the applicable Deconsolidation Date.

Post-IPO WhiteWave Tax Asset ” means any Tax Asset of the WhiteWave Group (i) existing at the end of the taxable period treated under Section 3.5(c) as ending on October 25, 2012 or (ii) generated in taxable periods beginning after October 25, 2012 (including the period treated as beginning on the day after October 25, 2012 pursuant to Section 3.5(c)), in each case, as determined under Sections 3.5 or 3.6, except to the extent that such Tax Asset is used to reduce the WhiteWave Group Federal Income Tax Liability or WhiteWave Group Combined Tax Liability.

 

4


Pre-Deconsolidation Period ” means any taxable period beginning on or prior to the applicable Deconsolidation Date.

Pro Forma WhiteWave Group Combined Return ” means a pro forma Combined Return or other schedule prepared pursuant to Section 3.6 of this Agreement.

Pro Forma WhiteWave Group Consolidated Return ” means a pro forma Consolidated Return prepared pursuant to Section 3.5(b) of this Agreement

Redetermination Amount ” means, with respect to any Consolidated Return or Combined Return for a taxable period, the amount determined under Section 3.9 of this Agreement.

Representation Letter ” means any letter executed by an officer of Dean Foods or WhiteWave and provided to Tax Counsel as a condition for the completion of a Tax Opinion or Supplemental Tax Opinion.

Ruling ” means (a) any private letter ruling issued by the IRS in connection with the Transactions described in the Separation and Distribution Agreement in response to a request for such a private letter ruling filed by Dean Foods (or any Dean Foods Affiliate) prior to the date of the Distribution, and/or (b) any similar ruling issued by any other Tax Authority addressing the application of a provision of the laws of another jurisdiction to the Transactions described in the Separation and Distribution Agreement.

Ruling Documents ” means (a) the request for a Ruling filed with the IRS, together with any supplemental filings or other materials subsequently submitted on behalf of Dean Foods, Dean Foods Affiliates and shareholders to the IRS, or on behalf of WhiteWave, WhiteWave Affiliates and shareholders to the IRS and the appendices and exhibits thereto, and any Ruling issued by the IRS to Dean Foods (or any Dean Foods Affiliate) or WhiteWave (or any WhiteWave Affiliate) in connection with the Transactions described in the Separation and Distribution Agreement and (b) any similar filings submitted to, or rulings issued by, any other Tax Authority in connection with the Transactions described in the Separation and Distribution Agreement.

Supplemental Ruling ” means (a) any ruling (other than the Ruling) issued by the IRS in connection with the Transactions described in the Separation and Distribution Agreement, and/or (b) any similar ruling issued by any other Tax Authority addressing the application of a provision of the laws of another jurisdiction to the Transactions described in the Separation and Distribution Agreement.

Supplemental Ruling Documents ” means (a) the request for a Supplemental Ruling, together with any supplemental filings or other materials subsequently submitted, the appendices and exhibits thereto, and any Supplemental Rulings issued by the IRS in connection with the Transactions described in the Separation and Distribution Agreement and (b) any similar filings submitted to, or rulings issued by, any other Tax Authority in connection with the Transactions described in the Separation and Distribution Agreement.

Supplemental Tax Opinion ” means a supplemental opinion issued by Tax Counsel addressing certain United States federal income tax consequences related to the Distribution.

 

5


Tax Asset ” means any net operating loss, net capital loss, investment tax credit, foreign tax credit, charitable deduction or any other deduction, credit or tax attribute which could reduce Taxes (including without limitation deductions and credits related to alternative minimum taxes).

Tax Authority ” includes the IRS and any state, local, or other governmental authority responsible for the administration of any Taxes.

Tax Counsel ” means a nationally recognized law firm or accounting firm with a reputable Tax practice selected to provide a Tax Opinion or a Supplemental Tax Opinion.

Tax ” or “ Taxes ” means any taxes, charges, fees, levies, imposts, duties, or other assessments of a similar nature, including without limitation, income, alternative or add-on minimum, gross receipts, excise, employment, sales, use, transfer, license, payroll, franchise, severance, stamp, occupation, windfall profits, withholding, Social Security, unemployment, disability, ad valorem, estimated, highway use, commercial rent, capital stock, paid up capital, recording, registration, property, real property gains, value added, business license, custom duties, or other tax, imposed or required to be withheld by any Tax Authority including any interest, additions to Tax, or penalties applicable thereto.

Tax Opinion ” means an opinion issued by Tax Counsel selected by Dean Foods as one of the conditions to completing the Distribution addressing certain United States federal income tax consequences of the Distribution under Section 355 of the Code.

Tax Return ” or “ Tax Returns ” means any return, declaration, statement, report, schedule, certificate, form, information return or any other document (and any related or supporting information) including an amended tax return required to be supplied to, or filed with, a Tax Authority with respect to Taxes.

WhiteWave Affiliate ” means any corporation or other entity, including any entity that is a disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes, directly or indirectly “controlled” by WhiteWave where “control” means the ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the ownership interests of such corporation or other entity (by vote or value) or the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of such corporation or other entity.

WhiteWave Business ” shall have the meaning set forth in the Separation and Distribution Agreement.

WhiteWave Group ” means the affiliated group of corporations, including any entity that is a disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes, as defined in Section 1504(a) of the Code, or similar group of entities as defined under similar laws of other jurisdictions, of which WhiteWave would be the common parent if it were not a subsidiary of Dean Foods, and any corporation or other entity, including any entity that is a disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes, which may be or become a member of such group from time to time.

WhiteWave Group Combined Tax Liability ” means, with respect to any taxable period, the WhiteWave Group’s liability for Non-Federal Combined Taxes as determined under Section 3.6 of this Agreement.

 

6


WhiteWave Group Federal Income Tax Liability ” means, with respect to any taxable period, the WhiteWave Group’s liability for Federal Income Taxes as determined under Section 3.5 of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 2

PREPARATION AND FILING OF TAX RETURNS

Section 2.1 In General .

(a) Dean Foods shall have the sole and exclusive responsibility for the preparation and filing of any Consolidated Return or Combined Return.

(b) WhiteWave shall, subject to Section 2.2 of this Agreement, be responsible for preparing and filing all Tax Returns of WhiteWave and the WhiteWave Affiliates other than those described in Section 2.1(a) of this Agreement.

(c) Unless otherwise required by a Final Determination, Dean Foods and WhiteWave, for itself and the WhiteWave Group, agree to file all Tax Returns, and to take all other actions, relating to Federal Income Taxes or Non-Federal Combined Taxes in a manner consistent with the position that WhiteWave and the WhiteWave Group are includible in the Consolidated Group and any applicable Combined Group for all days from October 25, 2012 through and including the Deconsolidation Date.

Section 2.2 Preparation and Filing of Returns .

(a) All Tax Returns filed after October 25, 2012 by Dean Foods, any Dean Foods Affiliate, WhiteWave, or any WhiteWave Affiliate shall (1) be prepared in a manner that is consistent with Article 4 of this Agreement and the Code, and (2) filed on a timely basis (taking into account applicable extensions) by the party responsible for such filing under Section 2.1 of this Agreement.

(b) Subject to Sections 2.2(c) and (d) of this Agreement, in its sole discretion, Dean Foods shall have the exclusive right with respect to any Consolidated Return or Combined Return (1) to determine (A) the manner in which such Tax Return shall be prepared and filed, including, without limitation, the manner in which any item of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit shall be reported, (B) whether any extensions may be requested, (C) the elections that will be made by any member of the Consolidated Group or applicable Combined Group, and (D) whether any amended Tax Returns should be filed, (2) to control, contest, and represent the interests of the Consolidated Group and any Combined Group in any Audit and to resolve, settle, or agree to any adjustment or deficiency proposed, asserted or assessed as a result of any Audit, (3) to file, prosecute, compromise or settle any claim for refund, and (4) to determine whether any refunds, to which the Consolidated Group or applicable Combined Group may be entitled, shall be paid by way of refund or credited against the Tax liability of the Consolidated Group or applicable Combined Group. WhiteWave, for itself and its subsidiaries, hereby irrevocably appoints Dean Foods as its agent and attorney-in-fact to take such action (including the execution of documents) as Dean Foods may deem appropriate to effect the foregoing.

 

7


(c) Unless otherwise required by law or determined in good faith by Dean Foods, any Consolidated Return or Combined Return to the extent it relates to the WhiteWave Business shall be filed in a manner consistent with past practice and on a basis consistent with the last previous similar Consolidated Return or Combined Return and to the extent items are not covered by past practice in accordance with generally accepted Tax accounting practices. If Dean Foods determines that a Consolidated Return or Combined Return to the extent it relates to the WhiteWave Business shall be filed in a manner inconsistent with past practice, it shall so notify WhiteWave prior to the filing of such return. Dean Foods shall provide WhiteWave with a copy of each proposed Consolidated Return or Combined Return to the extent it relates to the WhiteWave Business for review and comment at least 15 business days prior to the filing of a Consolidated Return or a Combined Return. Dean Foods shall consider in good faith any comments with respect to a return received from WhiteWave prior to filing the applicable return, and Dean Foods and WhiteWave shall attempt in good faith to resolve any dispute arising out of the review of a return prior to filing the applicable return. If such dispute is not resolved prior to the due date for filing such return, then Dean Foods shall file such return in the manner it determines appropriate.

(d) WhiteWave shall be entitled to participate at its expense in any Audit that is reasonably likely to result in WhiteWave being liable to Dean Foods for a Redetermination Amount pursuant to Section 3.9 or Section 4.3(b)(3) of this Agreement. Dean Foods shall notify WhiteWave of the commencement of any such Audit within 30 business days; provided, however, that WhiteWave shall not be relieved of any obligation to make payments under this Agreement if Dean Foods fails to timely deliver such notice except to the extent that WhiteWave is actually prejudiced thereby. Dean Foods shall not settle or agree to any adjustment or deficiency proposed, asserted or assessed as a result of any such Audit for which WhiteWave would be liable under Section 3.9 or 4.3(b)(3) of this Agreement without obtaining the prior written consent of WhiteWave, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. If WhiteWave does not respond to Dean Foods’ request for consent within 30 business days, WhiteWave shall be deemed to consent.

Section 2.3 Furnishing Information . WhiteWave (or the applicable WhiteWave Affiliate) shall (a) furnish to Dean Foods in a timely manner such information and documents as Dean Foods may reasonably request for purposes of (1) preparing any original or amended Consolidated Return or Combined Return, (2) contesting or defending any Audit relating to a Consolidated Return or a Combined Return, and (3) making any determination or computation necessary or appropriate under this Agreement, (b) cooperate in any Audit of any Consolidated Return or Combined Return, (c) retain and provide on demand books, records, documentation or other information relating to any Tax Return until the later of (1) the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations (giving effect to any extension, waiver, or mitigation thereof) and (2) in the event any claim is made under this Agreement for which such information is relevant, until a Final Determination with respect to such claim, and (d) take such action as Dean Foods may deem appropriate in connection therewith. Dean Foods shall provide WhiteWave (or the applicable WhiteWave Affiliate) any assistance reasonably required in providing any information requested pursuant to this Section 2.3.

Section 2.4 Expenses . WhiteWave shall reimburse Dean Foods for any outside legal and accounting expenses incurred by Dean Foods in the course of the conduct of any Audit regarding

 

8


the Tax liability of the Consolidated Group or any Combined Group, and for any other expense incurred by Dean Foods in the course of any litigation relating thereto, to the extent such costs are reasonably attributable to WhiteWave or any WhiteWave Affiliate and provided Dean Foods has conferred with WhiteWave as to the portion of the Audit relating to WhiteWave or the WhiteWave Affiliate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Dean Foods shall have the sole discretion to control, contest, represent, file, prosecute, challenge or settle any Audit pursuant to Section 2.2 of this Agreement, subject to Section 2.2(d).

ARTICLE 3

PAYMENT OF TAXES AND TAX SHARING AMOUNTS

Section 3.1 Federal Income Taxes . Dean Foods shall pay (or cause to be paid) to the IRS all Federal Income Taxes, if any, of the Consolidated Group.

Section 3.2 Non-Federal Combined Taxes . Dean Foods shall pay (or cause to be paid) to the appropriate Tax Authorities all Non-Federal Combined Taxes, if any, of any Combined Group.

Section 3.3 Non-Federal Separate Taxes and Other Taxes . WhiteWave shall pay to the appropriate Tax Authorities all Non-Federal Separate Taxes and any other Taxes (other than those described in Section 3.1 and Section 3.2 of this Agreement), if any, of WhiteWave and the WhiteWave Affiliates.

Section 3.4 WhiteWave Liability for Federal Income Taxes and Non-Federal Combined Taxes . For each taxable period beginning after October 25, 2012 relating to a Pre-Deconsolidation Period, WhiteWave shall pay to Dean Foods an amount equal to the sum of the WhiteWave Group Federal Income Tax Liability and the Aggregate WhiteWave Group Combined Tax Liability for such period.

Section 3.5 WhiteWave Group Federal Income Tax Liability .

(a) In General . The WhiteWave Group Federal Income Tax Liability with respect to any Consolidated Return for a taxable period shall be the WhiteWave Group’s liability for Federal Income Taxes as determined on a Pro Forma WhiteWave Group Consolidated Return prepared in accordance with Section 3.5(b) of this Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, the WhiteWave Group Federal Income Tax Liability with respect to any Consolidated Return shall not be less than zero.

(b) Pro Forma Federal Return . For each Consolidated Return to the extent needed under this Agreement, Dean Foods shall prepare or cause to be prepared (and, as requested by Dean Foods, WhiteWave shall cooperate in preparing) a Pro Forma WhiteWave Group Consolidated Return as if the WhiteWave Group were not and never were part of the Consolidated Group, but rather were a separate affiliated group of corporations of which WhiteWave were the common parent filing a consolidated federal income tax return pursuant to Section 1501 of the Code. For purposes of this Section 3.5(b), the WhiteWave Group’s Federal Income Tax Liability shall (1) be determined for the taxable year including the Deconsolidation Date assuming the taxable year ends on the Deconsolidation Date, (2) not be reduced by the

 

9


WhiteWave Group’s carrybacks and carryovers of federal Tax Assets from other taxable periods (such items being addressed by Section 3.5(d) herein), (3) exclude the Tax consequences of the Transactions, including any Tax consequences from the transfer or other movement of assets between the Dean Foods Group and the WhiteWave Group and the Tax consequences of any deferred intercompany transactions recognized as a result of the Deconsolidation; provided, that any deductions resulting from or relating to the novation of the $650,000,000 notional amount of interest rate swap contracts that are scheduled to mature March 31, 2017, pursuant to which WhiteWave assumes the liability related to such swaps shall be included and allocated to WhiteWave, (4) be determined assuming that any deductions arising prior to the Distribution with respect to the long-term and short-term incentives described in Articles IX and X of the Employee Matters Agreement be allocated between the Dean Foods Group and the WhiteWave Group in the same manner and same proportion as the corresponding book expense for financial accounting purposes and (5) be determined assuming that the Dean Foods Group (not the WhiteWave Group) is entitled to any deductions arising from the payment or accrual of liabilities with respect to the Dean Foods EDCP and Dean Foods SERP (as defined in the Employee Matters Agreement) pursuant to Article XI of the Employee Matters Agreement. The ProForma WhiteWave Group Consolidated Return shall be prepared consistent with the principles in the preceding sentence and, to the extent not inconsistent with the principles of the preceding sentence, in a manner consistent with the principles set forth in Section 2.2 of this Agreement.

(c) Year of IPO . For purposes of this Agreement, the taxable year that includes October 25, 2012 shall be treated as if it were comprised of two taxable periods, one of which ends on October 25, 2012 and one of which begins on the day after October 25, 2012. For purposes of computing the Federal Taxes attributable to each period of the taxable year, the amount of any item that is taken into account only once for each taxable year (e.g., the benefit of graduated tax rates, exemption amounts, etc.) shall be allocated between the two portions of the year in proportion to the number of days in each portion. To the extent needed under this Agreement, the WhiteWave Group Federal Income Tax Liability shall be determined separately for each period.

(d) Federal Tax Assets . Dean Foods shall pay to WhiteWave, not later than 30 business days after Dean Foods makes a payment to, or receives a payment, credit or offset from any Tax Authority pursuant to this Article 3, the amount, if any, by which one or more federal Post-IPO WhiteWave Tax Assets reduces the Federal Income Tax liability of the Consolidated Group for any taxable period. For purposes of computing the amount of the payment described in this Section 3.5(c), one or more federal Post-IPO WhiteWave Tax Assets shall be considered to reduce the Consolidated Group’s Federal Income Tax liability in a given period by an amount equal to the difference, if any, between (1) the amount of the Consolidated Group’s Federal Income Tax liability for the period computed without regard to such Tax Asset or Tax Assets and (2) the amount of the Consolidated Group’s Federal Income Tax liability for the period computed with regard to such Tax Asset or Tax Assets.

Section 3.6 WhiteWave Group Combined Tax Liability .

(a) In General . The WhiteWave Group Combined Tax Liability with respect to any Combined Return for a taxable period shall be the WhiteWave Group’s liability for Non-Federal Combined Tax as determined on a Pro Forma WhiteWave Group Combined Return prepared in a

 

10


manner consistent with the principles and procedures set forth in Sections 3.5(b) and 3.5(c) hereof. For the avoidance of doubt, the WhiteWave Group Combined Tax Liability with respect to any Combined Return shall not be less than zero.

(b) Non-Federal Tax Assets . Dean Foods shall pay to WhiteWave, not later than 30 business days after Dean Foods makes a payment to, or receives a payment, credit or offset from any Tax Authority pursuant to this Article 3, the amount, if any, by which one or more non-federal Post-IPO WhiteWave Tax Assets reduces the Non-Federal Combined Tax liability of the applicable Combined Group for any taxable period. For purposes of computing the amount of the payment described in this Section 3.6(b), one or more non-federal Post-IPO WhiteWave Tax Assets shall be considered to reduce the Combined Group’s Tax liability in a given period by an amount equal to the difference, if any, between (1) the amount of the Combined Group’s Tax liability for the period computed without regard to such Tax Asset or Tax Assets and (2) the amount of the Combined Group’s Tax liability for the period computed with regard to such Tax Asset or Tax Assets.

Section 3.7 Tax Sharing Installment Payments .

(a) Federal Income Taxes . Not later than five business days prior to each Estimated Tax Installment Date following October 25, 2012 with respect to a Pre-Deconsolidation Period, Dean Foods shall determine under Section 6655 of the Code the estimated amount of the related installment of the WhiteWave Group Federal Income Tax Liability for the taxable period. WhiteWave shall then pay to Dean Foods, not later than such Estimated Tax Installment Date, the amount thus determined.

(b) Non-Federal Combined Taxes . Not later than five business days prior to any estimated tax installment date following October 25, 2012 with respect to a Combined Return for a Pre-Deconsolidation Period, Dean Foods shall determine the estimated amount of the related installment of the WhiteWave Group Combined Tax Liability for the taxable period. WhiteWave shall pay to Dean Foods, not later than the due date for such installment, the amount thus determined.

Section 3.8 Tax Sharing True-Up Payments .

(a) Federal Income Taxes . Not later than 30 business days after a Consolidated Return is filed following October 25, 2012 with respect to any Pre-Deconsolidation Period, Dean Foods shall deliver to WhiteWave a Pro Forma WhiteWave Group Consolidated Return or other comparable schedule reflecting the WhiteWave Group Federal Income Tax Liability for such period (or period beginning after October 25, 2012, in the case of the Consolidated Return including October 25, 2012). Not later than 30 business days after the date such Pro Forma WhiteWave Group Consolidated Return or other schedule is delivered, WhiteWave shall pay to Dean Foods, or Dean Foods shall pay to WhiteWave, as appropriate, an amount equal to the difference, if any, between the WhiteWave Group Federal Income Tax Liability for such taxable period and the aggregate amount paid by WhiteWave with respect to such taxable period under Section 3.7(a) of this Agreement.

 

11


(b) Non-Federal Combined Taxes . Not later than 30 business days after a Combined Return is filed following October 25, 2012 with respect to any Pre-Deconsolidation Period, Dean Foods shall deliver to WhiteWave a Pro Forma WhiteWave Group Combined Return or other comparable schedule reflecting the WhiteWave Group Combined Tax Liability for such taxable period (or period beginning after October 25, 2012, in the case of the Consolidated Return including October 25, 2012). Not later than 30 business days following delivery of such Pro Forma WhiteWave Group Combined Return or other schedule, WhiteWave shall pay to Dean Foods, or Dean Foods shall pay to WhiteWave, as appropriate, an amount equal to the difference, if any, between the WhiteWave Group Combined Tax Liability for such taxable period and the amount paid by WhiteWave with respect to such taxable period under Section 3.7(b) of this Agreement.

(c) WhiteWave shall notify Dean Foods within 20 business days of receiving a Pro Forma WhiteWave Group Consolidated Return or Combined Return or comparable schedule of any dispute or disagreement regarding the calculation of the WhiteWave Group Federal Income Tax Liability or Combined Tax Liability reflected on such return or schedule. Dean Foods and WhiteWave shall attempt in good faith to resolve any such dispute or disagreement. If such disagreement or dispute is not resolved within 20 business days after notification by WhiteWave to Dean Foods of such disagreement or dispute, WhiteWave shall pay to Dean Foods, or Dean Foods shall pay to WhiteWave, the amount required pursuant to Section 3.8(a) or (b) above as determined by Dean Foods.

Section 3.9 Redetermination Amount .

(a) In General . In the event of any redetermination of any item of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit of any member of the Consolidated Group or any Combined Group as a result of a Final Determination or any settlement or compromise with any Tax Authority (including any amended Tax Return or claim for refund filed by Dean Foods), WhiteWave shall pay Dean Foods or Dean Foods shall pay WhiteWave, as the case may be, the absolute value of the Redetermination Amount with respect to each Consolidated Return or Combined Return affected by such redetermination, in the manner provided in Section 3.9(d).

(b) Computation . For each Consolidated Return or Combined Return for which there is a redetermination, the Redetermination Amount shall be (i) the WhiteWave Group Federal Income Tax Liability or White Wave Group Combined Tax liability, as applicable, with respect to such Tax Return as determined under Article 3 of this Agreement taking the redetermination into account minus (ii) the WhiteWave Group Federal Income Tax Liability or WhiteWave Group Combined Tax Liability, as applicable, with respect to such Tax Return as determined under Article 3 of this Agreement without taking the redetermination into account. If the Redetermination Amount is positive, WhiteWave shall pay Dean Foods, the Redetermination Amount in the manner provided in Section 3.9(d). If the Redetermination Amount is negative, Dean Foods shall pay WhiteWave the absolute value of the Redetermination Amount in the manner provided in Section 3.9(d). The applicable party shall also pay interest on the Redetermination Amount for each day that payment of the Tax or refund, as applicable, would be overdue for such Tax Return calculated (i) with respect to redeterminations affecting Federal Income Taxes, at the rate determined, in the case of payment by WhiteWave to Dean Foods, under Section 6621(a)(2) of the Code and, in the case of payment by Dean Foods to WhiteWave, under Section 6621(a)(1) of the Code, and (ii) with respect to redeterminations affecting Non-Federal Combined Taxes, under similar laws, if any, of the applicable jurisdictions.

 

12


(c) Tax Assets . If a redetermination results in an additional Tax Asset of the WhiteWave Group that does not reduce any WhiteWave Group Federal Income Tax Liability or WhiteWave Group Combined Tax Liability, then Dean Foods shall pay WhiteWave, at the time such Tax Asset is used, the amount by which such additional Tax Asset reduces the Federal Income Tax liability or Non-Federal Income Tax liability of the Consolidated Group or Combined Group, as applicable, in accordance with the principles set forth in Sections 3.5(d) and 3.6(b) (to the extent no payment is required for such Tax Asset under such sections).

(d) Payment . Dean Foods shall deliver to WhiteWave a schedule reflecting the computation of any Redetermination Amount. Not later than 30 business days after the date such schedule is delivered, WhiteWave shall pay Dean Foods, or Dean Foods shall pay WhiteWave, as applicable, the absolute value of the Redetermination Amount. The principles and procedures in Section 3.8(c) of this Agreement shall apply to any dispute or disagreement regarding the Redetermination Amount.

(e) Year of the IPO . Consistent with Section 3.5(c), if there is a redetermination that affects a Consolidated Return or Combined Return for the taxable year that includes October 25, 2012, the Redetermination Amount shall be determined separately for the taxable period ending on October 25, 2012 and the taxable period beginning on the day after October 25, 2012.

Section 3.10. Interest . Payments under this Article 3 that are not made within the prescribed period shall thereafter bear interest at the Federal short-term rate established pursuant to Section 6621 of the Code.

Section 3.11. Carrybacks . In the event any Tax Asset of the WhiteWave Group for any Post-Deconsolidation Period is eligible to be carried back to a Pre-Deconsolidation Period, WhiteWave shall, to the extent permitted by applicable law, elect to carry such amounts forward to any Post-Deconsolidation Period. If WhiteWave is required by law to carry back any such Tax Asset to a Pre-Deconsolidation Period, Dean Foods agrees to make a payment to WhiteWave to the extent that such a payment would otherwise be required under the terms of Section 3.5(d) or Section 3.6(b) of this Agreement, net of any expenses incurred by Dean Foods or Dean Foods Affiliates. If subsequent to the payment by Dean Foods to WhiteWave of any such amount, there shall be (1) a Final Determination which results in a disallowance or a reduction of the Tax Asset so carried back or (2) a reduction in the amount of the benefit realized by the Dean Foods Group for any reason, WhiteWave shall repay to Dean Foods, within 30 business days of such event any amount which would not have been payable to WhiteWave pursuant to this Section 3.11 had the amount of the benefit been determined in light of these events. WhiteWave shall hold Dean Foods harmless for any penalty, addition to Tax or interest payable by any member of the Dean Foods Group as a result of any such event. Any such amount shall be paid by WhiteWave to Dean Foods within 30 business days of the payment by Dean Foods or any member of the Consolidated Group or Combined Group of any such penalty, addition to Tax, or interest.

 

13


Section 3.12 Deferred Compensation Plans and Other Incentive Plans . Pursuant to Article XI of the Employee Matters Agreement, all liabilities accrued under the Dean Foods EDCP and Dean Foods SERP related to WhiteWave Employees and Former WhiteWave Employees shall be retained by, and remain the sole responsibility of, the appropriate member of the Dean Foods Group (all capitalized terms shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Employee Matters Agreement). Dean Foods and WhiteWave shall cooperate in determining how the accrual or payment of such liabilities by the Dean Foods Group shall be reported for Tax purposes. If any member of the WhiteWave Group is entitled to a deduction or other Tax Asset as a result of the accrual or payment by any member of the Dean Foods Group of such liabilities after the Deconsolidation Date, as determined by the parties pursuant to the preceding sentence or as a result of an adjustment to the Tax Returns of the Dean Foods Group or WhiteWave Group by a Tax Authority, WhiteWave shall pay to Dean Foods, at the time such deduction or Tax Asset is used, the amount by which such deduction or other Tax Asset reduces the Tax liability of the WhiteWave Group. In the event that the Distribution occurs after the Deconsolidation Date and the WhiteWave Group is entitled to any deductions arising after the Deconsolidation Date but prior to the Distribution with respect to the long-term or short-term incentives described in Articles IX and X of the Employee Matters Agreement that would have been allocated to the Dean Foods Group pursuant to Section 3.5(b), WhiteWave shall pay to Dean Foods, at the time such deduction is used, the amount by which such deduction reduces the Tax liability of the WhiteWave Group.

Section 3.13 Taxes Attributable to Other Business . To the extent (i) the WhiteWave Group (or a member of the WhiteWave Group) is assessed Taxes by a Tax Authority, or is responsible for Taxes pursuant to this Agreement, for a Pre-Deconsolidation Period and all or a portion of such assessed Taxes are attributable to the Dean Foods Business or Dean Foods Assets, or (ii) the Dean Foods Group (or a member of the Dean Foods Group) is assessed Taxes by a Tax Authority, or is responsible for Taxes pursuant to this Agreement, for a Pre-Deconsolidation Period and all or a portion of such assessed Taxes are attributable to the WhiteWave Business or WhiteWave Assets (the party that was assessed the taxes pursuant to (i) or (ii) being the “Assessed Party” and the other party being the “Non-Assessed Party”), then the parties will cooperate in good faith to allocate such assessed Taxes appropriately based upon the extent to which the Taxes are attributable to the WhiteWave Business and/or the Dean Foods Business. The Non-Assessed Party will reimburse the Assessed Party for the portion of such Taxes the parties agree to allocate to the business of the Non-Assessed Party promptly after such agreement. All terms used in this Section 3.13 that are not defined in this Agreement have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Separation and Distribution Agreement. This Section 3.13 shall not apply to Distribution Taxes, which shall be governed by Article IV.

ARTICLE 4

DECONSOLIDATION AND DISTRIBUTION TAXES

Section 4.1 Continuing Covenants . WhiteWave, for itself and the WhiteWave Affiliates, covenants that it will not (nor will it cause or permit any member of the WhiteWave Group ) without the prior written consent of Dean Foods, in respect of any Pre-Deconsolidation Period, (a) make or change any tax election, (b) change any accounting method, (c) amend any Tax

 

14


Return or take any Tax position on any Tax Return that is inconsistent with any Tax position on any Tax Return of the Dean Foods Group, or (d) take any action, omit to take any action or enter into any transaction that results in any increased Tax liability or reduction of any Tax Asset of the Dean Foods Group.

Section 4.2 Additional Continuing Covenants .

(a) WhiteWave Restrictions . WhiteWave agrees that it will not (1) issue any stock of WhiteWave (or any instrument that is convertible, exercisable or exchangeable into any such stock) if such issuance, would, or would reasonably be expected to, cause Dean Foods to own stock of WhiteWave that on a fully diluted basis, does not constitute “control” (within the meaning of Section 368(c) of the Code) of WhiteWave, and (2) as long as Dean Foods owns stock of WhiteWave constituting control (within the meaning of Section 368(c) of the Code), knowingly take or fail to take, or permit any WhiteWave Affiliate to knowingly take or fail to take, any action that could reasonably be expected to preclude Dean Foods’s ability to effectuate the Distribution or the Equity for Debt Exchange (to the extent such exchange is intended to meet the requirements of Section 361(c)(3)) as a tax-free transaction under Sections 355 and 361(c) of the Code. In the event of the Distribution, WhiteWave agrees that (1) it will take, and cause each WhiteWave Affiliate to take, any action reasonably requested by Dean Foods in order to enable Dean Foods to effectuate the Distribution or the Equity for Debt Exchange (to the extent such exchange is intended to meet the requirements of Section 361(c)(3)) as a tax-free transaction under Sections 355 and 361(c) of the Code and (2) it will not take or fail to take, or permit any WhiteWave Affiliate to take or fail to take, any action where such action or failure to act would be inconsistent with any written representations of an officer of WhiteWave pursuant to Section 4.2(e) of this Agreement with respect to any material, information, covenant or representation that relates to facts or matters related to WhiteWave, any WhiteWave Affiliate, or the WhiteWave Business or within the control of WhiteWave or any WhiteWave Affiliate in a Representation Letter, Tax Opinion, Supplemental Tax Opinion, Ruling Documents, Supplemental Ruling Documents, Ruling, or Supplemental Ruling other than as permitted by Section 4.2(c) of this Agreement. For this purpose an action is considered inconsistent with a representation if the representation states that there is no plan or intention to take such action. In the event of the Distribution, WhiteWave agrees that it will not take (and it will cause the WhiteWave Affiliates to refrain from taking) any position on a Tax Return that is inconsistent with the treatment of the Distribution or the Equity for Debt Exchange (to the extent such exchange is intended to meet the requirements of Section 361(c)(3)) as a tax-free transaction under Sections 355 and 361(c) of the Code.

(b) Dean Foods Restrictions . In the event of the Distribution, Dean Foods agrees that it will not take or fail to take, or permit any Dean Foods Affiliate to take or fail to take, any action where such action or failure to act would be inconsistent with any material, information, covenant or representation that relates to facts or matters related to Dean Foods (or any Dean Foods Affiliate) or the Dean Foods Business or within the control of Dean Foods and is contained in a Representation Letter, Tax Opinion, Supplemental Tax Opinion, Ruling Documents, Supplemental Ruling Documents, Ruling, or Supplemental Ruling. For this purpose an action is considered inconsistent with a representation if the representation states that there is no plan or intention to take such action. In the event of the Distribution, Dean Foods agrees that it will not take (and it will cause the Dean Foods Affiliates to refrain from taking) any position

 

15


on a Tax Return that is inconsistent with the treatment of the Distribution or the Equity for Debt Exchange (to the extent such exchange is intended to meet the requirements of Section 361(c)(3)) as a tax-free transaction under Sections 355 and 361(c) of the Code.

(c) Certain WhiteWave Actions . WhiteWave agrees that, during the period beginning on October 25, 2012 and ending two years following the Distribution, without first obtaining, at WhiteWave’s own expense, (i) a Supplemental Ruling that such action will not result in Distribution Taxes, (ii) a Supplemental Tax Opinion from Tax Counsel selected by WhiteWave that such action will not result in Distribution Taxes that is acceptable to Dean Foods in its reasonable discretion, or (iii) the consent of Dean Foods to the action proposed to be taken, WhiteWave shall not and shall not permit any WhiteWave Affiliate to:

(1) sell all or substantially all of the assets of WhiteWave or any WhiteWave Affiliate or sell, transfer, or issue any stock of a WhiteWave Affiliate (other than a sale, transfer, or issuance to another member of the WhiteWave Group that would not cause the Distribution to fail to qualify as a tax-free Distribution under Section 355);

(2) liquidate or merge WhiteWave or any WhiteWave Affiliate with another entity (other than a liquidation or merger with or into another member of the WhiteWave Group that would not cause the Distribution to fail to qualify as a tax-free distribution under Section 355), without regard to which party is the surviving entity;

(3) transfer any assets of WhiteWave in a transaction described in Section 351 or subparagraph (C) or (D) of Section 368(a)(1) of the Code (other than a transfer to a corporation, including any entity that is a disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes, which files a consolidated return with WhiteWave and which is wholly-owned, directly or indirectly, by WhiteWave);

(4) subject to Section 4.2(f), issue stock of WhiteWave (or any instrument that is convertible or exchangeable into any such stock) (excluding any issuance pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or other employment-related arrangements having customary terms and conditions and that satisfy the requirements of Safe Harbor VIII as set forth in Treasury Regulations § 1.355-7(d)(8) (“Option Issuances”)), which would result in the acquisition by one or more persons of more than the Applicable Percentage (by vote or value) of the stock of WhiteWave, determined under the principles of Section 355(e) of the Code, when aggregated with all issuances, redemptions, sales or other acquisitions of WhiteWave stock during such period, excluding (i) the issuance of shares in the IPO, (ii) any transfer by the Dean Foods Group permitted pursuant to Section 4.6 of the Separation and Distribution Agreement, (iii) Option Issuances, (iv) acquisitions in the public market that satisfy the requirements of Safe Harbor VII as set forth in Treasury Regulations § 1.355-7(d)(7), and (v) an issuance or other acquisition for which a Supplemental Ruling or a Supplemental Tax Opinion has been obtained that such issuance or acquisition will not be treated as part of a plan with the Distribution under one of the safe harbors set forth in Treasury Regulation §1.355-7(d);

 

16


(5) facilitate or otherwise participate in any acquisition of stock in WhiteWave that would result in any shareholder owning five percent (5%) or more of the outstanding stock of WhiteWave;

(6) redeem or repurchase WhiteWave stock in a manner contrary to the requirements of Section 4.05(1)(b) of Revenue Procedure 96-30 (as in effect prior to its modification by Revenue Procedure 2003-48 and as may be modified or amended from time to time) or in any other manner contrary to the representations made in any Representation Letter, Ruling Documents, or Supplemental Ruling Documents; or

(7) discontinue, cease, transfer or dispose of its active trades or businesses as defined for purposes of Section 355.

WhiteWave or any WhiteWave Affiliate shall only undertake any of such actions after Dean Foods’s receipt of such Supplemental Tax Opinion or Supplemental Ruling and pursuant to the terms and conditions of any such Supplemental Tax Opinion or Supplemental Ruling or as otherwise consented to in writing in advance by Dean Foods. Dean Foods agrees to cooperate with WhiteWave to seek to obtain, as expeditiously as possible, a Supplemental Ruling or Supplemental Tax Opinion for the purpose of permitting WhiteWave to undertake any of such actions. The parties hereby agree that they will act in good faith to take all reasonable steps necessary to amend this Section 4.2(c), from time to time, by mutual agreement, to (A) add certain actions to the list contained herein, or (B) remove certain actions from the list contained herein, in either case, in order to reflect any relevant change in law, regulation or administrative interpretation occurring after October 25, 2012. Nothing in this Section 4.2(c) shall limit the liability of WhiteWave for any Distribution Taxes that are WhiteWave’s responsibility under the terms of this Agreement.

(d) Notice of Specified Transactions . Not later than 30 days prior to entering into any oral or written contract or agreement, and not later than 5 days after it first becomes aware of any negotiations, plan or intention (regardless of whether it is a party to such negotiations, plan or intention), regarding any of the transactions described in Section 4.2(c) of this Agreement (whether or not a transaction is permitted under the terms hereof without first obtaining a Supplemental Tax Opinion, a Supplemental Ruling or agreement from Dean Foods), WhiteWave shall provide written notice of its intent to consummate such transaction or the negotiations, plan or intention of which it becomes aware, as the case may be, to Dean Foods. Notwithstanding anything in this Section 4.2(d) to the contrary, no such written notice shall be required for Option Issuances.

(e) WhiteWave Cooperation . WhiteWave agrees that, at the request of Dean Foods, WhiteWave shall cooperate fully with Dean Foods to take any action necessary or reasonably helpful to effectuate the Distribution or the Equity for Debt Exchanges, including seeking to obtain, as expeditiously as possible, a Tax Opinion, Supplemental Tax Opinion, Ruling, and/or Supplemental Ruling. Such cooperation shall include the execution of any documents that may be necessary or reasonably helpful in connection with obtaining any Tax Opinion, Supplemental Tax Opinion, Ruling, and/or Supplemental Ruling (including, without limitation, any (1) power of attorney, (2) Representation Letter, (3) Ruling Documents, (4) Supplemental Rulings Documents, and/or (5) reasonably requested written representations confirming that (A)

 

17


WhiteWave has read the Representation Letter, Ruling Documents, and/or Supplemental Ruling Documents and (B) all information and representations, if any, relating to WhiteWave, any WhiteWave Affiliate, or the WhiteWave Business contained in the Representation Letter, Ruling Documents, and/or Supplemental Ruling Documents are true, correct and complete in all respects).

(f) Deconsolidation . Notwithstanding Section 4.2(c)(4), WhiteWave shall not issue any stock prior to the Distribution without the consent of Dean Foods if such issuance would cause a Deconsolidation.

Section 4.3 Indemnity .

(a) Dean Foods Indemnification . Dean Foods shall be liable for and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless WhiteWave and each WhiteWave Affiliate and each of their respective representatives and each of the heirs, executors, successors and assigns of any of the foregoing from and against:

(1) any Distribution Taxes, to the extent that such Distribution Taxes are attributable to, caused by, or result from, one or more of the following: (A) any action or omission by Dean Foods (or any Dean Foods Affiliate) inconsistent with any material, information, covenant or representation related to Dean Foods, any Dean Foods Affiliate, or the Dean Foods Business in a Representation Letter, Tax Opinion, Supplemental Tax Opinion, Ruling Documents, Supplemental Ruling Documents, Ruling, or Supplemental Ruling (for the avoidance of doubt, disclosure of any action or fact that is inconsistent with any material, information, covenant or representation submitted to Tax Counsel, the IRS, or other Tax Authority, as applicable, in connection with a Representation Letter, Tax Opinion, Supplemental Tax Opinion, Ruling Documents, Supplemental Ruling Documents, Ruling, or Supplemental Ruling shall not relieve Dean Foods (or any Dean Foods Affiliate) of liability under this Agreement); (B) any action or omission by Dean Foods (or any Dean Foods Affiliate), including a cessation, transfer, or disposition of its active trades or businesses as defined for purposes of Section 355, stock buyback or payment of an extraordinary dividend by Dean Foods (or any Dean Foods Affiliate); (C) any acquisition of any stock or assets of Dean Foods (or any Dean Foods Affiliate) by one or more other persons (other than WhiteWave or a WhiteWave Affiliate) prior to or following the Distribution; or (D) any issuance of stock by Dean Foods (or any Dean Foods Affiliate), including any issuance pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or other employment related arrangements or the exercise of warrants;

(2) all liability as a result of Treasury Regulation §1.1502-6 or of any comparable provision for Non-Federal Taxes of any person which is or has ever been affiliated with Dean Foods or any Dean Foods Affiliate or with which Dean Foods or any Dean Foods Affiliate joins or has ever joined (or is or has ever been required to join) in filing any consolidated, combined or unitary income Tax Return for any taxable period ending on or before the Deconsolidation Date except to the extent the WhiteWave Group is liable for such Taxes pursuant to Section 4.3(b);

 

18


(3) all Taxes for any tax period (whether beginning before, on or after the Deconsolidation Date), and any other Losses, attributable to the breach by Dean Foods or any Dean Foods Affiliate of any representation, warranty, covenant or obligation under this Agreement;

(4) all Taxes imposed on either Dean Foods or any Dean Foods Affiliate or WhiteWave or any WhiteWave Affiliate as a result of the Transactions, including all Taxes (whether federal or state) arising out of or attributable to deferred intercompany transactions recognized as a result of the Transactions, including any tax consequences from the transfer or other movement of assets between the Dean Foods Group and WhiteWave Group, but excluding Distribution Taxes; and

(5) any Redetermination Amount payable by Dean Foods pursuant to the terms of Section 3.9 hereof.

(b) WhiteWave’s Indemnification . WhiteWave shall be liable for and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Dean Foods and each Dean Foods Affiliate and each of their respective representatives and each of the heirs, executors, successors and assigns of any of the foregoing from and against:

(1) any Distribution Taxes, to the extent that such Distribution Taxes are attributable to, caused by, or result from, one or more of the following: (A) any action or omission by WhiteWave (or any WhiteWave Affiliate) that is inconsistent with any written representations of an officer of WhiteWave pursuant to Section 4.2(e) of this Agreement with respect to any material, information, covenant or representation related to WhiteWave, any WhiteWave Affiliate, or the WhiteWave Business in a Representation Letter, Tax Opinion, Supplemental Tax Opinion, Ruling Documents, Supplemental Ruling Documents, Ruling, or Supplemental Ruling (for the avoidance of doubt, disclosure of any action or fact that is inconsistent with any material, information, covenant or representation submitted to Tax Counsel, the IRS, or other Tax Authority, as applicable, in connection with a Representation Letter, Tax Opinion, Supplemental Tax Opinion, Ruling Documents, Supplemental Ruling Documents, Ruling, or Supplemental Ruling shall not relieve WhiteWave (or any WhiteWave Affiliate) of liability under this Agreement); (B) any action or omission by WhiteWave (or any WhiteWave Affiliate), including a cessation, transfer, or disposition of its active trades or businesses as defined for purposes of Section 355, stock buyback or payment of an extraordinary dividend by WhiteWave (or any WhiteWave Affiliate); (C) any acquisition of any stock or assets of WhiteWave (or any WhiteWave Affiliate) by one or more other persons (other than Dean Foods or any Dean Foods Affiliate) prior to or following the Distribution; (D) any issuance of stock by WhiteWave (or any WhiteWave Affiliate), including any issuance pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or other employment related arrangements or the exercise of warrants or (E) any transfer of WhiteWave Common Stock by the Dean Foods Group permitted pursuant to Section 4.6 of the Separation and Distribution Agreement (whether before or after the Distribution) in the event that WhiteWave has breached Section 4.2(c) hereof (for the avoidance of doubt, WhiteWave shall be liable for and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Dean Foods and each

 

19


Dean Foods Affiliate and each of their respective representatives and each of the heirs, executors, successors and assigns of any of the foregoing from and against any Distribution Taxes resulting from or arising out of any action or omission described above regardless of whether it is otherwise permitted under the terms of this Agreement);

(2) all Taxes for any tax period (whether beginning before, on or after the Deconsolidation Date), and any other Losses, attributable to the breach by WhiteWave or any WhiteWave Affiliate of any representation, warranty, covenant or obligation under this Agreement; and

(3) any Redetermination Amount payable by WhiteWave pursuant to the terms of Section 3.9 hereof.

(c) Treatment of Payments . Unless otherwise required by any Final Determination, the parties agree that any payments made by one party to another party pursuant to this Agreement after the Deconsolidation Date shall, to the extent permissible under applicable law, be treated for all Tax and financial accounting purposes as contributions or distributions, as appropriate, made immediately prior to the Deconsolidation Date. If it is determined that the receipt or accrual of any payment is subject to Tax, such payment shall be increased so that the amount of such increased payment reduced by the amount of all Taxes payable with respect to the receipt thereof (but taking into account all correlative Tax deductions resulting from the payment of such Taxes) shall equal the amount of the payment which the party receiving such payment would otherwise be entitled to receive pursuant to this Agreement.

Section 4.4 Equity Compensation . WhiteWave shall be entitled to claim on its Tax Returns any tax deduction attributable to the exercise or vesting, following the Distribution, of an option or restricted stock unit that was converted from an option or restricted stock unit of Dean Foods to an option or restricted stock unit of WhiteWave, and neither Dean Foods nor any Dean Foods Affiliate shall attempt to claim any such Tax deduction. WhiteWave shall withhold applicable Taxes and satisfy applicable Tax reporting requirements with respect to the exercise or vesting of options or restricted stock units to purchase WhiteWave stock.

ARTICLE 5

MISCELLANEOUS

Section 5.1 Term . All rights and obligations arising hereunder shall survive until they are fully effectuated or performed provided that, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement shall remain in effect and its provisions shall survive for the full period of all applicable statutes of limitation (giving effect to any extension, waiver or mitigation thereof).

Section 5.2 Allocations .

(a) In General . All computations with respect to any Pre-Deconsolidation Period shall be made pursuant to the principles of Treasury Regulations Section 1.1502-76(b), taking into account such elections thereunder as Dean Foods, in its sole discretion, shall make.

 

20


(b) Tax Assets/Earnings and Profits . Dean Foods shall advise WhiteWave in writing within 90 days after the filing of the Consolidated Return for the taxable period that includes the Deconsolidation Date of the allocation of any Tax Assets and earnings and profits among Dean Foods, each Dean Foods Affiliate, WhiteWave, and each WhiteWave Affiliate. The parties hereby agree that, for purposes of determining such allocation, Dean Foods shall be free to use any legally permissible method of allocation in its sole discretion.

Section 5.3 Changes in Law . Any reference to a provision of the Code or a similar law of another jurisdiction shall include a reference to any successor provision to such provision.

Section 5.4 Confidentiality . Each party shall hold and cause its advisors and consultants to hold in strict confidence, unless compelled to disclose by judicial or administrative process or, in the opinion of its counsel, by other requirements of law, all information (other than any such information relating solely to the business or affairs of such party) concerning the other parties hereto furnished it by such other party or its representatives pursuant to this Agreement (except to the extent that such information can be shown to have been (a) previously known by the party to which it was furnished, (b) in the public domain through no fault of such party, or (c) later lawfully acquired from other sources not under a duty of confidentiality by the party to which it was furnished), and each party shall not release or disclose such information to any other person, except its auditors, attorneys, financial advisors, bankers and other consultants who shall be advised of and agree to be bound by the provisions of this Section 5.4. Each party shall be deemed to have satisfied its obligation to hold confidential information concerning or supplied by the other party if it exercises the same care as it takes to preserve confidentiality for its own similar information.

Section 5.5 Successors . This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of any successor, by merger, acquisition of assets or otherwise, to any of the parties hereto (including any successor of Dean Foods and WhiteWave succeeding to the tax attributes of such party under Section 381 of the Code), to the same extent as if such successor had been an original party.

Section 5.6 Authorization, Etc . Each of the parties hereto hereby represents and warrants that it has the power and authority to execute, deliver and perform this Agreement, that this Agreement has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of such party, that this Agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of each such party and that the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by such party does not contravene or conflict with any provision of law or of its charter or bylaws or any agreement, instrument or order binding on such party.

Section 5.7 Entire Agreement . This Agreement contains the entire agreement among the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements. If, and to the extent, the provisions of this Agreement conflict with the Transition Services Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall control.

Section 5.8 Section Captions . Section captions used in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and shall not affect the construction of this Agreement.

 

21


Section 5.9 Governing Law . This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without giving effect to laws and principles relating to conflicts of law.

Section 5.10 Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement.

Section 5.11 Waivers and Amendments . This Agreement shall not be waived, amended or otherwise modified except in writing, duly executed by all of the parties hereto.

Section 5.12 Severability . In case any one or more of the provisions in this Agreement should be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof will not in any way be effected or impaired thereby.

Section 5.13 No Third Party Beneficiaries . This Agreement is solely for the benefit of the parties to this Agreement and each Dean Foods Affiliate and WhiteWave Affiliate and should not be deemed to confer upon third parties any remedy, claim, liability, reimbursement, claim of action or other rights in excess of those existing without this Agreement.

Section 5.14 Other Remedies . WhiteWave recognizes that any failure by it or any WhiteWave Affiliate to comply with its obligations under Article 4 of this Agreement would, in the event of the Distribution, result in Distribution Taxes that would cause irreparable harm to Dean Foods, Dean Foods Affiliates, and their stockholders. Accordingly, Dean Foods shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this Agreement, this being in addition to any other remedy to which Dean Foods is entitled at law or in equity.

 

22


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Agreement to be executed by a duly authorized officer as of the date first above written.

DEAN FOODS COMPANY

 

By:  

/s/ Chris Bellairs

Name:   Chris Bellairs
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
THE WHITEWAVE FOODS COMPANY
By:  

/s/ Kelly J. Haecker

Name:   Kelly J. Haecker
Title:   Chief Financial Officer

 

23

Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I, Gregg A. Tanner, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dean Foods Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/ S / G REGG A. T ANNER

Chief Executive Officer and Director

May 9, 2013

Exhibit 31.2

Certification

I, Chris Bellairs, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dean Foods Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/ S / C HRIS B ELLAIRS

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

May 9, 2013

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dean Foods Company (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregg A. Tanner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/ S / G REGG A. T ANNER

Gregg A. Tanner

Chief Executive

Officer and Director

May 9, 2013

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dean Foods Company (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chris Bellairs, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/ S / C HRIS B ELLAIRS

Chris Bellairs

Executive Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer

May 9, 2013

EXHIBIT 99

DEAN HOLDING COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

     March 31, 2013  

Assets

  

Current assets:

  

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 10,516   

Receivables, net

     354,929   

Inventories

     146,926   

Deferred income taxes

     24,896   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     6,227   
  

 

 

 

Total current assets

     543,494   

Property, plant and equipment, net

     519,896   

Goodwill

     44,057   

Identifiable intangible and other assets, net

     180,960   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,288,407   
  

 

 

 

Liabilities and Parent’s Net Investment

  

Current liabilities:

  

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ 256,017   
  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     256,017   

Long-term debt

     131,346   

Deferred income taxes

     84,079   

Other long-term liabilities

     51,021   

Parent’s net investment:

  

Parent’s net investment

     769,858   

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (3,914
  

 

 

 

Total parent’s net investment

     765,944   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,288,407   
  

 

 

 


DEAN HOLDING COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED OPERATING INFORMATION

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31, 2013
 

Net sales

   $ 1,043,074   

Cost of sales

     821,189   
  

 

 

 

Gross profit

     221,885   

Operating costs and expenses:

  

Selling and distribution

     154,012   

General and administrative

     18,337   

Amortization of intangibles

     551   

Facility closing and reorganization costs

     2,208   

Impairment of long-lived assets

     6,394   
  

 

 

 

Total operating costs and expenses

     181,502   
  

 

 

 

Operating income

     40,383   

Other expense:

  

Interest expense

     2,907   

Other expense, net

     24,805   
  

 

 

 

Total other expense

     27,712   
  

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

     12,671   

Income taxes

     5,196   
  

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

     7,475   

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

     (23

Loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax

     (2,100
  

 

 

 

Net income

     5,352   

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

     527   
  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

   $ 5,879