FILE NOS. 333-160595 AND 811-22311
AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON AUGUST 8, 2013
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-1A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 | x | |||
Post-Effective Amendment No. 46 |
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 | x | |||
Amendment No. 48 |
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
211 Main Street, San Francisco, California 94105
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip code)
(800) 648-5300
(Registrants Telephone Number, including Area Code)
Marie Chandoha
211 Main Street, San Francisco, California 94105
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
Copies of communications to:
David J. Lekich, Esq. | Douglas P. Dick, Esq. | |
Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. | Dechert LLP | |
211 Main Street | 1900 K Street, N.W. | |
SF211MN-05-491 | Washington, D.C. 20006 | |
San Francisco, CA 94105 |
It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box)
¨ | Immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b) |
x | On August 8, 2013, pursuant to paragraph (b) |
¨ | 60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) |
¨ | On (date), pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) |
¨ | 75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) |
¨ | On (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485 |
If appropriate, check the following box:
¨ | This post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment. |
Schwab Fundamental Index* ETFs
Prospectus
August 8, 2013
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF |
FNDB | |
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF |
FNDX | |
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF |
FNDA | |
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF |
FNDF | |
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF |
FNDC | |
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF |
FNDE |
Principal U.S. Listing Exchange: NYSE Arca, Inc.
As with all exchange traded funds, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has not approved these securities or passed on whether the information in this prospectus is adequate and accurate. Anyone who indicates otherwise is committing a federal crime. |
* | SCHWAB is a registered trademark of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. |
FUNDAMENTAL INDEX is a registered trademark of Research Affiliates LLC.
Schwab Fundamental Index ETFs
Fund summaries | ||||
1 | ||||
4 | ||||
7 | ||||
10 | ||||
13 | ||||
16 | ||||
About the funds | 19 | |||
Fund details | ||||
20 | ||||
22 | ||||
23 | ||||
25 | ||||
27 | ||||
30 | ||||
32 | ||||
33 | ||||
Fund management | 34 | |||
Investing in the funds | 35 | |||
35 | ||||
35 | ||||
36 | ||||
37 | ||||
38 |
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Ticker Symbol: FNDB
Investment objective
The funds goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Index.
Fund fees and expenses
This table describes the fees and expenses you may pay if you buy and hold shares of the fund. The table does not reflect brokerage commissions you may incur when buying or selling fund shares.
Example |
This example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the fund with the cost of investing in other funds. The example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the fund for the time periods indicated and then redeem all of your shares at the end of those time periods. The example also assumes that your investment has a 5% return each year and that the funds operating expenses remain the same. This example does not reflect any brokerage commissions you may incur when buying or selling fund shares. Your actual costs may be higher or lower.
Expenses on a $10,000 investment |
1 year | 3 years | |
$33 | $103 |
Portfolio turnover |
The fund pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or turns over its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover may indicate higher transaction costs and may result in higher taxes when fund shares are held in a taxable account. These
costs, which are not reflected in the annual fund operating expenses or in the example, affect the funds performance. The fund is new and therefore does not have a historical portfolio turnover rate.
Principal investment strategies
To pursue its goal, the fund generally invests in stocks that are included in the Russell Fundamental U.S. Index 1 (the Index). The Index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buyback rather than market capitalization. The Index measures the performance of the constituent companies by fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies included in the Russell 3000 ® Index (the Russell Index). Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Index. The weights of the companies included in the Index are determined annually and are implemented using a partial quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. The Index is compiled and calculated by Russell Investments in conjunction with Research Affiliates LLC, and the method of calculating the components of the Index is subject to change.
It is the funds policy that, under normal circumstances, it will invest at least 90% of its net assets in stocks included in the Index. The fund will notify its shareholders at least 60 days before changing this policy. The fund may sell securities that are represented in the Index in anticipation of their removal from the Index, or buy securities that are not yet represented in the Index in anticipation of their addition to the Index.
Under normal circumstances, the fund may invest up to 10% of its net assets in securities not included in the Index. The principal types of these investments include those that the Adviser believes will help the fund track the Index, such as investments in (a) securities that are not represented in the Index but the Adviser anticipates will be added to the Index or as necessary to reflect various corporate actions (such as mergers and spin-offs), (b) other
1 |
Index ownership Russell Fundamental U.S. Index is a joint trademark of Russell Investments (Russell) and Research Affiliates LLC (RA) and is used by the fund under license. Research Affiliates and Fundamental Index are trademarks of RA. Subject to RAs intellectual property rights in certain content, Russell is the owner of all copyrights related to the Russell Fundamental Indexes. Russell is the owner of the trademarks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Russell or RA, and Russell and RA do not make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in shares of the fund. |
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 1 |
investment companies, and (c) derivatives, principally futures contracts. The fund may use futures contracts and other derivatives primarily to seek returns on the funds otherwise uninvested cash assets to help it better track the Index. The fund may also invest in cash and cash equivalents, and may lend its securities to minimize the difference in performance that naturally exists between an index fund and its corresponding index.
Because it may not be possible or practicable to purchase all of the stocks in the Index, the Adviser seeks to track the total return of the Index by using statistical sampling techniques. These techniques involve investing in a limited number of Index securities which, when taken together, are expected to perform similarly to the Index as a whole. These techniques are based on a variety of factors, including performance attributes, tax considerations, capitalization, dividend yield, price/earnings ratio, industry factors, risk factors and other characteristics. The fund generally expects that its portfolio will hold less than the total number of securities in the Index, but reserves the right to hold as many securities as it believes necessary to achieve the funds investment objective. The fund generally expects that its industry weightings, dividend yield and price/earnings ratio will be similar to those of the Index.
The fund will concentrate its investments ( i.e. , hold 25% or more of its total assets) in a particular industry, group of industries or sector to approximately the same extent that the Index is so concentrated. For purposes of this limitation, securities of the U.S. government (including its agencies and instrumentalities), and repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. government securities are not considered to be issued by members of any industry.
The Adviser seeks to achieve, over time, a correlation between the funds performance and that of the Index, before fees and expenses, of 95% or better. However, there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve a high degree of correlation with the Index. A number of factors may affect the funds ability to achieve a high correlation with the Index, including the number of Index securities held by the fund as part of the sampling technique. The correlation between the performance of the fund and the Index may also diverge due to transaction costs, asset valuations, corporate actions (such as mergers and spin-offs), timing variances, and differences between the funds portfolio and the Index resulting from legal restrictions (such as diversification requirements) that apply to the fund but not to the Index.
Principal risks
The fund is subject to risks, any of which could cause an investor to lose money. The funds principal risks include:
Market Risk. Stock markets rise and fall daily. As with any investment whose performance is tied to these markets, the value of your investment in the fund will fluctuate, which means that you could lose money.
Investment Style Risk. The fund is not actively managed. Therefore, the fund follows the securities included in the index during upturns as well as downturns. Because of its indexing strategy, the fund does not take steps to reduce market exposure or to lessen the effects of a
declining market. In addition, because of the funds expenses, the funds performance may be below that of the index.
Equity Risk. The prices of equity securities rise and fall daily. These price movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, industries or the securities market as a whole. In addition, equity markets tend to move in cycles, which may cause stock prices to fall over short or extended periods of time.
Large-Cap and Mid-Cap Risk. Both large- and mid-cap stocks tend to go in and out of favor based on market and economic conditions. However, stocks of mid-cap companies tend to be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic events than larger more established companies. During a period when large- and mid-cap U.S. stocks fall behind other types of investments small-cap stocks, for instance the funds large- and mid-cap holdings could reduce performance.
Small-Cap Risk. Historically, small-cap stocks have been riskier than large-cap stocks, and their prices may move sharply, especially during market upturns and downturns. Small-cap companies may be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic events than larger, more established companies. During a period when small-cap stocks fall behind other types of investments large-cap stocks, for instance the funds small-cap holdings could reduce performance.
Sampling Index Tracking Risk. The fund may not fully replicate the index and may hold securities not included in the index. As a result, the fund is subject to the risk that the advisers investment management strategy, the implementation of which is subject to a number of constraints, may not produce the intended results. Because the fund utilizes a sampling approach it may not track the return of the index as well as it would if the fund purchased all of the securities in its benchmark index.
Tracking Error Risk. As an index fund, the fund seeks to track the performance of its benchmark index, although it may not be successful in doing so. The divergence between the performance of the fund and its benchmark index, positive or negative, is called tracking error. Tracking error can be caused by many factors and it may be significant.
Derivatives Risk. The funds use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments and could cause the fund to lose more than the principal amount invested. In addition, investments in derivatives may involve leverage, which means a small percentage of assets invested in derivatives can have a disproportionately larger impact on the fund.
Liquidity Risk. A particular investment may be difficult to purchase or sell. The fund may be unable to sell a security at an advantageous time or price.
Securities Lending Risk. Securities lending involves the risk of loss of rights in the collateral or delay in recovery of the collateral if the borrower fails to return the security loaned or becomes insolvent.
2 | Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF |
Concentration Risk. To the extent that the funds or the indexs portfolio is concentrated in the securities of issuers in a particular market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class, the fund may be adversely affected by the performance of those securities, may be subject to increased price volatility and may be more susceptible to adverse economic, market, political or regulatory occurrences affecting that market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class.
Market Trading Risk. Although fund shares are listed on national securities exchanges, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for fund shares will develop or be maintained. If an active market is not maintained, investors may find it difficult to buy or sell fund shares.
Shares of the Fund May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV. Fund shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of the shares of the fund will approximate the funds net asset value (NAV), there may be times when the market price and the NAV vary significantly. You may pay more than NAV when you buy shares of the fund in the secondary market, and you may receive less than NAV when you sell those shares in the secondary market.
Lack of Governmental Insurance or Guarantee. An investment in the fund is not a bank deposit and it is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
For more information on the risks of investing in the fund please see the Fund details section in the prospectus.
Performance
The fund is new and therefore does not have a performance history. Once the fund has completed a full calendar year of operations a bar chart and table will be included that will provide some indication of the risks of investing in the fund by showing the variability of the funds returns and comparing the funds performance to the index.
Investment adviser
Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.
Portfolio managers
Agnes Hong, CFA, Managing Director and Head of Passive Equity Strategies, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. She has managed the fund since inception.
Chuck Craig, CFA, Managing Director and Senior Portfolio Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. He has managed the fund since inception.
Jane Qin , Portfolio Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. She has managed the fund since inception.
Purchase and sale of fund shares
The fund issues and redeems shares at its NAV only in large blocks of shares, typically 50,000 shares or more (Creation Units). These transactions are usually in exchange for a basket of securities included in the index and/or an amount of cash. As a practical matter, only institutions or large investors purchase or redeem Creation Units. Except when aggregated in Creation Units, shares of the fund are not redeemable securities.
Individual shares of the fund trade on national securities exchanges and elsewhere during the trading day and can only be bought and sold at market prices throughout the trading day through a broker-dealer. Because fund shares trade at market prices rather than NAV, shares may trade at a price greater than NAV (premium) or less than NAV (discount).
Tax information
Dividends and capital gains distributions received from the fund will generally be taxable as ordinary income or capital gains, unless you are investing through an IRA, 401(k) or other tax-advantaged account.
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 3 |
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Ticker Symbol: FNDX
Investment objective
The funds goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index.
Fund fees and expenses
This table describes the fees and expenses you may pay if you buy and hold shares of the fund. The table does not reflect brokerage commissions you may incur when buying or selling fund shares.
Example |
This example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the fund with the cost of investing in other funds. The example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the fund for the time periods indicated and then redeem all of your shares at the end of those time periods. The example also assumes that your investment has a 5% return each year and that the funds operating expenses remain the same. This example does not reflect any brokerage commissions you may incur when buying or selling fund shares. Your actual costs may be higher or lower.
Expenses on a $10,000 investment |
1 year | 3 years | |
$33 | $103 |
Portfolio turnover |
The fund pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or turns over its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover may indicate higher transaction costs and may result in
higher taxes when fund shares are held in a taxable account. These costs, which are not reflected in the annual fund operating expenses or in the example, affect the funds performance. The fund is new and therefore does not have a historical portfolio turnover rate.
Principal investment strategies
To pursue its goal, the fund generally invests in stocks that are included in the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index 1 (the Index). The Index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The Index measures the performance of the large company size segment by fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies included in the Russell 3000 ® Index (the Russell Index). Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Index. Companies with weights above 87.5% make up the Index. The weights of the companies included in the Index are determined annually and are implemented using a partial quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. The Index is compiled and calculated by Russell Investments in conjunction with Research Affiliates LLC, and the method of calculating the components of the Index is subject to change.
It is the funds policy that, under normal circumstances, it will invest at least 90% of its net assets in stocks included in the Index. The fund will notify its shareholders at least 60 days before changing this policy. The fund will generally give the same weight to a given stock as the Index does. However, when the investment adviser believes it is in the best interest of the fund, such as to avoid purchasing odd-lots ( i.e. , purchasing less than the usual number of shares traded for a security), for tax considerations, or to address liquidity considerations with respect to a stock, the investment adviser may cause the funds weighting of a stock to be more or less than the Indexs weighting of the stock. The fund may sell securities that are represented in the Index in anticipation of their removal
1 |
Index ownership Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index is a joint trademark of Russell Investments (Russell) and Research Affiliates LLC (RA) and is used by the fund under license. Research Affiliates and Fundamental Index are trademarks of RA. Subject to RAs intellectual property rights in certain content, Russell is the owner of all copyrights related to the Russell Fundamental Indexes. Russell is the owner of the trademarks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Russell or RA, and Russell and RA do not make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in shares of the fund. |
4 | Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF |
from the Index, or buy securities that are not yet represented in the Index in anticipation of their addition to the Index.
Under normal circumstances, the fund may invest up to 10% of its net assets in securities not included in the Index. The principal types of these investments include those that the Adviser believes will help the fund track the Index, such as investments in (a) securities that are not represented in the Index but the Adviser anticipates will be added to the Index or as necessary to reflect various corporate actions (such as mergers and spin-offs), (b) other investment companies, and (c) derivatives, principally futures contracts. The fund may use futures contracts and other derivatives primarily to seek returns on the funds otherwise uninvested cash assets to help it better track the Index. The fund may also invest in cash and cash equivalents, and may lend its securities to minimize the difference in performance that naturally exists between an index fund and its corresponding index.
The fund will concentrate its investments ( i.e. , hold 25% or more of its total assets) in a particular industry, group of industries or sector to approximately the same extent that the Index is so concentrated. For purposes of this limitation, securities of the U.S. government (including its agencies and instrumentalities), and repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. government securities are not considered to be issued by members of any industry.
The Adviser seeks to achieve, over time, a correlation between the funds performance and that of the Index, before fees and expenses, of 95% or better. However, there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve a high degree of correlation with the Index. A number of factors may affect the funds ability to achieve a high correlation with the Index, including the degree to which the fund utilizes a sampling technique (which involves investing in a limited number of Index securities that, when taken together, are expected to perform similarly to the Index as a whole). The correlation between the performance of the fund and the Index may also diverge due to transaction costs, asset valuations, corporate actions (such as mergers and spin-offs), timing variances, and differences between the funds portfolio and the Index resulting from legal restrictions (such as diversification requirements) that apply to the fund but not to the Index.
Principal risks
The fund is subject to risks, any of which could cause an investor to lose money. The funds principal risks include:
Market Risk. Stock markets rise and fall daily. As with any investment whose performance is tied to these markets, the value of your investment in the fund will fluctuate, which means that you could lose money.
Investment Style Risk. The fund is not actively managed. Therefore, the fund follows the securities included in the index during upturns as well as downturns. Because of its indexing strategy, the fund does not take steps to reduce market exposure or to lessen the effects of a declining market. In addition, because of the funds expenses, the funds performance may be below that of the index.
Equity Risk. The prices of equity securities rise and fall daily. These price movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, industries or the securities market as a whole. In addition, equity markets tend to move in cycles, which may cause stock prices to fall over short or extended periods of time.
Large-Cap Risk. Large-cap stocks tend to go in and out of favor based on market and economic conditions. During a period when large-cap U.S. stocks fall behind other types of investments small-cap stocks, for instance the funds large-cap holdings could reduce performance.
Tracking Error Risk. As an index fund, the fund seeks to track the performance of its benchmark index, although it may not be successful in doing so. The divergence between the performance of the fund and its benchmark index, positive or negative, is called tracking error. Tracking error can be caused by many factors and it may be significant.
Derivatives Risk. The funds use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments and could cause the fund to lose more than the principal amount invested. In addition, investments in derivatives may involve leverage, which means a small percentage of assets invested in derivatives can have a disproportionately larger impact on the fund.
Liquidity Risk. A particular investment may be difficult to purchase or sell. The fund may be unable to sell a security at an advantageous time or price.
Securities Lending Risk. Securities lending involves the risk of loss of rights in the collateral or delay in recovery of the collateral if the borrower fails to return the security loaned or becomes insolvent.
Concentration Risk. To the extent that the funds or the indexs portfolio is concentrated in the securities of issuers in a particular market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class, the fund may be adversely affected by the performance of those securities, may be subject to increased price volatility and may be more susceptible to adverse economic, market, political or regulatory occurrences affecting that market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class.
Market Trading Risk. Although fund shares are listed on national securities exchanges, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for fund shares will develop or be maintained. If an active market is not maintained, investors may find it difficult to buy or sell fund shares.
Shares of the Fund May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV. Fund shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of the shares of the fund will approximate the funds net asset value (NAV), there may be times when the market price and the NAV vary significantly. You may pay more than NAV when you buy shares of the fund in the secondary market, and you may receive less than NAV when you sell those shares in the secondary market.
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 5 |
Lack of Governmental Insurance or Guarantee. An investment in the fund is not a bank deposit and it is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
For more information on the risks of investing in the fund please see the Fund details section in the prospectus.
Performance
The fund is new and therefore does not have a performance history. Once the fund has completed a full calendar year of operations a bar chart and table will be included that will provide some indication of the risks of investing in the fund by showing the variability of the funds returns and comparing the funds performance to the index.
Investment adviser
Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.
Portfolio managers
Agnes Hong, CFA, Managing Director and Head of Passive Equity Strategies, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. She has managed the fund since inception.
Chuck Craig, CFA, Managing Director and Senior Portfolio Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. He has managed the fund since inception.
Jane Qin , Portfolio Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. She has managed the fund since inception.
Purchase and sale of fund shares
The fund issues and redeems shares at its NAV only in large blocks of shares, typically 50,000 shares or more (Creation Units). These transactions are usually in exchange for a basket of securities included in the index and/or an amount of cash. As a practical matter, only institutions or large investors purchase or redeem Creation Units. Except when aggregated in Creation Units, shares of the fund are not redeemable securities.
Individual shares of the fund trade on national securities exchanges and elsewhere during the trading day and can only be bought and sold at market prices throughout the trading day through a broker-dealer. Because fund shares trade at market prices rather than NAV, shares may trade at a price greater than NAV (premium) or less than NAV (discount).
Tax information
Dividends and capital gains distributions received from the fund will generally be taxable as ordinary income or capital gains, unless you are investing through an IRA, 401(k) or other tax-advantaged account.
6 | Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF |
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Ticker Symbol: FNDA
Investment objective
The funds goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index.
Fund fees and expenses
This table describes the fees and expenses you may pay if you buy and hold shares of the fund. The table does not reflect brokerage commissions you may incur when buying or selling fund shares.
Example |
This example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the fund with the cost of investing in other funds. The example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the fund for the time periods indicated and then redeem all of your shares at the end of those time periods. The example also assumes that your investment has a 5% return each year and that the funds operating expenses remain the same. This example does not reflect any brokerage commissions you may incur when buying or selling fund shares. Your actual costs may be higher or lower.
Expenses on a $10,000 investment |
1 year | 3 years | |
$33 | $103 |
Portfolio turnover |
The fund pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or turns over its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover may indicate higher transaction costs and may result in
higher taxes when fund shares are held in a taxable account. These costs, which are not reflected in the annual fund operating expenses or in the example, affect the funds performance. The fund is new and therefore does not have a historical portfolio turnover rate.
Principal investment strategies
To pursue its goal, the fund generally invests in stocks that are included in the Russell Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index 1 (the Index) . The Index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The Index measures the performance of the small company size segment by fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies included in the Russell 3000 ® Index (the Russell Index). Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Index. Companies with weights below the 87.5% mark make up the Index. The weights of the companies included in the Index are determined annually and are implemented using a quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. The Index is compiled and calculated by Russell Investments in conjunction with Research Affiliates LLC, and the method of calculating the components of the Index is subject to change.
It is the funds policy that, under normal circumstances, it will invest at least 90% of its net assets in stocks included in the Index. The fund will notify its shareholders at least 60 days before changing this policy. The fund will generally give the same weight to a given stock as the Index does. However, when the investment adviser believes it is in the best interest of the fund, such as to avoid purchasing odd-lots ( i.e. , purchasing less than the usual number of shares traded for a security), for tax considerations, or to address liquidity considerations with respect to a stock, the investment adviser may cause the funds weighting of a stock to be more or less than the Indexs weighting of the stock. The fund may sell securities that are represented in the Index in anticipation of their removal
1 | Index ownership Russell Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index is a joint trademark of Russell Investments (Russell) and Research Affiliates LLC (RA) and is used by the fund under license. Research Affiliates and Fundamental Index are trademarks of RA. Subject to RAs intellectual property rights in certain content, Russell is the owner of all copyrights related to the Russell Fundamental Indexes. Russell is the owner of the trademarks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Russell or RA, and Russell and RA do not make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in shares of the fund. |
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF | 7 |
from the Index, or buy securities that are not yet represented in the Index in anticipation of their addition to the Index.
Under normal circumstances, the fund may invest up to 10% of its net assets in securities not included in the Index. The principal types of these investments include those that the Adviser believes will help the fund track the Index, such as investments in (a) securities that are not represented in the Index but the Adviser anticipates will be added to the Index or as necessary to reflect various corporate actions (such as mergers and spin-offs), (b) other investment companies, and (c) derivatives, principally futures contracts. The fund may use futures contracts and other derivatives primarily to seek returns on the funds otherwise uninvested cash assets to help it better track the Index. The fund may also invest in cash and cash equivalents, and may lend its securities to minimize the difference in performance that naturally exists between an index fund and its corresponding index.
The fund will concentrate its investments ( i.e. , hold 25% or more of its total assets) in a particular industry, group of industries or sector to approximately the same extent that the Index is so concentrated. For purposes of this limitation, securities of the U.S. government (including its agencies and instrumentalities), and repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. government securities are not considered to be issued by members of any industry.
The Adviser seeks to achieve, over time, a correlation between the funds performance and that of the Index, before fees and expenses, of 95% or better. However, there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve a high degree of correlation with the Index. A number of factors may affect the funds ability to achieve a high correlation with the Index, including the degree to which the fund utilizes a sampling technique (which involves investing in a limited number of Index securities that, when taken together, are expected to perform similarly to the Index as a whole). The correlation between the performance of the fund and the Index may also diverge due to transaction costs, asset valuations, corporate actions (such as mergers and spin-offs), timing variances, and differences between the funds portfolio and the Index resulting from legal restrictions (such as diversification requirements) that apply to the fund but not to the Index.
Principal risks
The fund is subject to risks, any of which could cause an investor to lose money. The funds principal risks include:
Market Risk. Stock markets rise and fall daily. As with any investment whose performance is tied to these markets, the value of your investment in the fund will fluctuate, which means that you could lose money.
Investment Style Risk. The fund is not actively managed. Therefore, the fund follows the securities included in the index during upturns as well as downturns. Because of its indexing strategy, the fund does not take steps to reduce market exposure or to lessen the effects of a declining market. In addition, because of the funds expenses, the funds performance may be below that of the index.
Equity Risk. The prices of equity securities rise and fall daily. These price movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, industries or the securities market as a whole. In addition, equity markets tend to move in cycles, which may cause stock prices to fall over short or extended periods of time.
Small-Cap Risk. Historically, small-cap stocks have been riskier than large -cap stocks, and their prices may move sharply, especially during market upturns and downturns. Small-cap companies may be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic events than larger, more established companies. During a period when small-cap stocks fall behind other types of investments large-cap stocks, for instance the funds small-cap holdings could reduce performance.
Tracking Error Risk. As an index fund, the fund seeks to track the performance of its benchmark index, although it may not be successful in doing so. The divergence between the performance of the fund and its benchmark index, positive or negative, is called tracking error. Tracking error can be caused by many factors and it may be significant.
Derivatives Risk. The funds use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments and could cause the fund to lose more than the principal amount invested. In addition, investments in derivatives may involve leverage, which means a small percentage of assets invested in derivatives can have a disproportionately larger impact on the fund.
Liquidity Risk. A particular investment may be difficult to purchase or sell. The fund may be unable to sell a security at an advantageous time or price.
Securities Lending Risk. Securities lending involves the risk of loss of rights in the collateral or delay in recovery of the collateral if the borrower fails to return the security loaned or becomes insolvent.
Concentration Risk. To the extent that the funds or the indexs portfolio is concentrated in the securities of issuers in a particular market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class, the fund may be adversely affected by the performance of those securities, may be subject to increased price volatility and may be more susceptible to adverse economic, market, political or regulatory occurrences affecting that market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class.
Market Trading Risk. Although fund shares are listed on national securities exchanges, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for fund shares will develop or be maintained. If an active market is not maintained, investors may find it difficult to buy or sell fund shares.
Shares of the Fund May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV. Fund shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of the shares of the fund will approximate the funds net asset value (NAV), there may be times when the market price and the NAV vary significantly.
8 | Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF |
You may pay more than NAV when you buy shares of the fund in the secondary market, and you may receive less than NAV when you sell those shares in the secondary market.
Lack of Governmental Insurance or Guarantee. An investment in the fund is not a bank deposit and it is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
For more information on the risks of investing in the fund please see the Fund details section in the prospectus.
Performance
The fund is new and therefore does not have a performance history. Once the fund has completed a full calendar year of operations a bar chart and table will be included that will provide some indication of the risks of investing in the fund by showing the variability of the funds returns and comparing the funds performance to the index.
Investment adviser
Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.
Portfolio managers
Agnes Hong, CFA, Managing Director and Head of Passive Equity Strategies, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. She has managed the fund since inception.
Chuck Craig, CFA, Managing Director and Senior Portfolio Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. He has managed the fund since inception.
Jane Qin , Portfolio Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. She has managed the fund since inception.
Purchase and sale of fund shares
The fund issues and redeems shares at its NAV only in large blocks of shares, typically 50,000 shares or more (Creation Units). These transactions are usually in exchange for a basket of securities included in the index and/or an amount of cash. As a practical matter, only institutions or large investors purchase or redeem Creation Units. Except when aggregated in Creation Units, shares of the fund are not redeemable securities.
Individual shares of the fund trade on national securities exchanges and elsewhere during the trading day and can only be bought and sold at market prices throughout the trading day through a broker-dealer. Because fund shares trade at market prices rather than NAV, shares may trade at a price greater than NAV (premium) or less than NAV (discount).
Tax information
Dividends and capital gains distributions received from the fund will generally be taxable as ordinary income or capital gains, unless you are investing through an IRA, 401(k) or other tax-advantaged account.
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF | 9 |
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Ticker Symbol: FNDF
Investment objective
The funds goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index.
Fund fees and expenses
This table describes the fees and expenses you may pay if you buy and hold shares of the fund. The table does not reflect brokerage commissions you may incur when buying or selling fund shares.
Example |
This example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the fund with the cost of investing in other funds. The example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the fund for the time periods indicated and then redeem all of your shares at the end of those time periods. The example also assumes that your investment has a 5% return each year and that the funds operating expenses remain the same. This example does not reflect any brokerage commissions you may incur when buying or selling fund shares. Your actual costs may be higher or lower.
Expenses on a $10,000 investment |
1 year | 3 years | |
$33 | $103 |
Portfolio turnover |
The fund pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or turns over its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover may indicate higher transaction costs and may result in
higher taxes when fund shares are held in a taxable account. These costs, which are not reflected in the annual fund operating expenses or in the example, affect the funds performance. The fund is new and therefore does not have a historical portfolio turnover rate.
Principal investment strategies
To pursue its goal, the fund generally invests in stocks that are included in the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index 1 (the Index). The Index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The Index measures the performance of the large company size segment by fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies included in the Russell Developed ex-U.S. Index (the Russell Index). Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Index. Companies with weights above 87.5% make up the Index. The weights of the companies included in the Index are determined annually and are implemented using a partial quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. The Index is compiled and calculated by Russell Investments in conjunction with Research Affiliates LLC, and the method of calculating the components of the Index is subject to change.
It is the funds policy that, under normal circumstances, it will invest at least 90% of its net assets in stocks included in the Index, including depositary receipts representing securities of the Index; which may be in the form of American Depositary receipts (ADRs), Global Depositary receipts (GDRs) and European Depositary receipts (EDRs). The fund will notify its shareholders at least 60 days before changing this policy. The fund may sell securities that are represented in the Index in anticipation of their removal from the Index, or buy securities that are not yet represented in the Index in anticipation of their addition to the Index.
Under normal circumstances, the fund may invest up to 10% of its net assets in securities not included in the Index. The principal
1 |
Index ownership Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index is a joint trademark of Russell Investments (Russell) and Research Affiliates LLC (RA) and is used by the fund under license. Research Affiliates and Fundamental Index are trademarks of RA. Subject to RAs intellectual property rights in certain content, Russell is the owner of all copyrights related to the Russell Fundamental Indexes. Russell is the owner of the trademarks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Russell or RA, and Russell and RA do not make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in shares of the fund. |
10 | Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF |
types of these investments include those that the Adviser believes will help the fund track the Index, such as investments in (a) securities that are not represented in the Index but the Adviser anticipates will be added to the Index or as necessary to reflect various corporate actions (such as mergers and spin-offs), (b) other investment companies, and (c) derivatives, principally futures contracts. The fund may use futures contracts and other derivatives primarily to seek returns on the funds otherwise uninvested cash assets to help it better track the Index. The fund may also invest in cash and cash equivalents, and may lend its securities to minimize the difference in performance that naturally exists between an index fund and its corresponding index. The fund does not hedge its exposure to foreign currencies.
Because it may not be possible or practicable to purchase all of the stocks in the Index, the Adviser seeks to track the total return of the Index by using statistical sampling techniques. These techniques involve investing in a limited number of Index securities which, when taken together, are expected to perform similarly to the Index as a whole. These techniques are based on a variety of factors, including performance attributes, tax considerations, capitalization, dividend yield, price/earnings ratio, industry factors, risk factors and other characteristics. The fund generally expects that its portfolio will hold less than the total number of securities in the Index, but reserves the right to hold as many securities as it believes necessary to achieve the funds investment objective. The fund generally expects that its industry weightings, dividend yield and price/earnings ratio will be similar to those of the Index.
The fund will concentrate its investments ( i.e. , hold 25% or more of its total assets) in a particular industry, group of industries or sector to approximately the same extent that the Index is so concentrated. For purposes of this limitation, securities of the U.S. government (including its agencies and instrumentalities), and repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. government securities are not considered to be issued by members of any industry.
The Adviser seeks to achieve, over time, a correlation between the funds performance and that of the Index, before fees and expenses, of 95% or better. However, there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve a high degree of correlation with the Index. A number of factors may affect the funds ability to achieve a high correlation with the Index, including the number of Index securities held by the fund as part of the sampling technique. The correlation between the performance of the fund and the Index may also diverge due to transaction costs, asset valuations, corporate actions (such as mergers and spin-offs), timing variances, and differences between the funds portfolio and the Index resulting from legal restrictions (such as diversification requirements) that apply to the fund but not to the Index.
Principal risks
The fund is subject to risks, any of which could cause an investor to lose money. The funds principal risks include:
Market Risk. Stock markets rise and fall daily. As with any investment whose performance is tied to these markets, the value of
your investment in the fund will fluctuate, which means that you could lose money.
Investment Style Risk. The fund is not actively managed. Therefore, the fund follows the securities included in the index during upturns as well as downturns. Because of its indexing strategy, the fund does not take steps to reduce market exposure or to lessen the effects of a declining market. In addition, because of the funds expenses, the funds performance may be below that of the index.
Equity Risk. The prices of equity securities rise and fall daily. These price movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, industries or the securities market as a whole. In addition, equity markets tend to move in cycles, which may cause stock prices to fall over short or extended periods of time.
Large-Cap Risk. Large-cap stocks tend to go in and out of favor based on market and economic conditions. During a period when large-cap U.S. stocks fall behind other types of investments small-cap stocks, for instance the funds large-cap holdings could reduce performance.
Foreign Investment Risk. The funds investments in securities of foreign issuers may involve certain risks that are greater than those associated with investments in securities of U.S. issuers. These include risks of adverse changes in foreign economic, political, regulatory and other conditions; changes in currency exchange rates or exchange control regulations (including limitations on currency movements and exchanges); differing accounting, auditing, financial reporting and legal standards and practices; differing securities market structures; and higher transaction costs. Foreign securities also include ADRs, GDRs, and EDRs, which are receipts issued by U.S. and foreign banks that represent shares of foreign-based corporations. Investment in ADRs, GDRs and EDRs may be less liquid than the underlying shares in their primary trading market and GDRs, many of which are issued by companies in emerging markets, may be more volatile. To the extent the funds investments in a single country or a limited number of countries represent a larger percentage of the funds assets, the funds performance may be adversely affected by the economic, political and social conditions in those countries and it may be subject to increased price volatility.
Sampling Index Tracking Risk. The fund may not fully replicate the index and may hold securities not included in the index. As a result, the fund is subject to the risk that the advisers investment management strategy, the implementation of which is subject to a number of constraints, may not produce the intended results. Because the fund utilizes a sampling approach it may not track the return of the index as well as it would if the fund purchased all of the securities in its benchmark index.
Tracking Error Risk. As an index fund, the fund seeks to track the performance of its benchmark index, although it may not be successful in doing so. The divergence between the performance of the fund and its benchmark index, positive or negative, is called
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 11 |
tracking error. Tracking error can be caused by many factors and it may be significant.
Derivatives Risk. The funds use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments and could cause the fund to lose more than the principal amount invested. In addition, investments in derivatives may involve leverage, which means a small percentage of assets invested in derivatives can have a disproportionately larger impact on the fund.
Liquidity Risk. A particular investment may be difficult to purchase or sell. The fund may be unable to sell a security at an advantageous time or price.
Securities Lending Risk. Securities lending involves the risk of loss of rights in the collateral or delay in recovery of the collateral if the borrower fails to return the security loaned or becomes insolvent.
Concentration Risk. To the extent that the funds or the indexs portfolio is concentrated in the securities of issuers in a particular market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class, the fund may be adversely affected by the performance of those securities, may be subject to increased price volatility and may be more susceptible to adverse economic, market, political or regulatory occurrences affecting that market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class.
Market Trading Risk. Although fund shares are listed on national securities exchanges, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for fund shares will develop or be maintained. If an active market is not maintained, investors may find it difficult to buy or sell fund shares.
Shares of the Fund May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV. Fund shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of the shares of the fund will approximate the funds net asset value (NAV), there may be times when the market price and the NAV vary significantly. You may pay more than NAV when you buy shares of the fund in the secondary market, and you may receive less than NAV when you sell those shares in the secondary market.
Lack of Governmental Insurance or Guarantee. An investment in the fund is not a bank deposit and it is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
For more information on the risks of investing in the fund please see the Fund details section in the prospectus.
Performance
The fund is new and therefore does not have a performance history. Once the fund has completed a full calendar year of operations a bar chart and table will be included that will provide some indication of the risks of investing in the fund by showing the variability of the funds returns and comparing the funds performance to the index.
Investment adviser
Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.
Portfolio managers
Agnes Hong, CFA, Managing Director and Head of Passive Equity Strategies, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. She has managed the fund since inception.
Chuck Craig, CFA, Managing Director and Senior Portfolio Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. He has managed the fund since inception.
Jane Qin , Portfolio Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. She has managed the fund since inception.
Purchase and sale of fund shares
The fund issues and redeems shares at its NAV only in large blocks of shares, typically 100,000 shares or more (Creation Units). These transactions are usually in exchange for a basket of securities included in the index and/or an amount of cash. As a practical matter, only institutions or large investors purchase or redeem Creation Units. Except when aggregated in Creation Units, shares of the fund are not redeemable securities.
Individual shares of the fund trade on national securities exchanges and elsewhere during the trading day and can only be bought and sold at market prices throughout the trading day through a broker-dealer. Because fund shares trade at market prices rather than NAV, shares may trade at a price greater than NAV (premium) or less than NAV (discount).
Tax information
Dividends and capital gains distributions received from the fund will generally be taxable as ordinary income or capital gains, unless you are investing through an IRA, 401(k) or other tax-advantaged account.
12 | Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF |
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Ticker Symbol: FNDC
Investment objective
The funds goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Small Company Index.
Fund fees and expenses
This table describes the fees and expenses you may pay if you buy and hold shares of the fund. The table does not reflect brokerage commissions you may incur when buying or selling fund shares.
Example |
This example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the fund with the cost of investing in other funds. The example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the fund for the time periods indicated and then redeem all of your shares at the end of those time periods. The example also assumes that your investment has a 5% return each year and that the funds operating expenses remain the same. This example does not reflect any brokerage commissions you may incur when buying or selling fund shares. Your actual costs may be higher or lower.
Expenses on a $10,000 investment |
1 year | 3 years | |
$47 | $148 |
Portfolio turnover |
The fund pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or turns over its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover may indicate higher transaction costs and may result in higher taxes when fund shares are held in a taxable account. These
costs, which are not reflected in the annual fund operating expenses or in the example, affect the funds performance. The fund is new and therefore does not have a historical portfolio turnover rate.
Principal investment strategies
To pursue its goal, the fund generally invests in stocks that are included in the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Small Company Index 1 (the Index) . The Index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The Index measures the performance of the small company size segment by fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies included in the Russell Developed ex-U.S. Index (the Russell Index). Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Index. Companies with weights below the 87.5% mark make up the Index. The weights of the companies included in the Index are determined annually and are implemented using a partial quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. The Index is compiled and calculated by Russell Investments in conjunction with Research Affiliates LLC, and the method of calculating the components of the Index is subject to change.
It is the funds policy that, under normal circumstances, it will invest at least 90% of its net assets in stocks included in the Index, including depositary receipts representing securities of the Index; which may be in the form of American Depositary receipts (ADRs), Global Depositary receipts (GDRs) and European Depositary receipts (EDRs). The fund will notify its shareholders at least 60 days before changing this policy. The fund may sell securities that are represented in the Index in anticipation of their removal from the Index, or buy securities that are not yet represented in the Index in anticipation of their addition to the Index.
Under normal circumstances, the fund may invest up to 10% of its net assets in securities not included in the Index. The principal
1 |
Index ownership Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Small Company Index is a joint trademark of Russell Investments (Russell) and Research Affiliates LLC (RA) and is used by the fund under license. Research Affiliates and Fundamental Index are trademarks of RA. Subject to RAs intellectual property rights in certain content, Russell is the owner of all copyrights related to the Russell Fundamental Indexes. Russell is the owner of the trademarks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Russell or RA, and Russell and RA do not make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in shares of the fund. |
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF | 13 |
types of these investments include those that the Adviser believes will help the fund track the Index, such as investments in (a) securities that are not represented in the Index but the Adviser anticipates will be added to the Index or as necessary to reflect various corporate actions (such as mergers and spin-offs), (b) other investment companies, and (c) derivatives, principally futures contracts. The fund may use futures contracts and other derivatives primarily to seek returns on the funds otherwise uninvested cash assets to help it better track the Index. The fund may also invest in cash and cash equivalents, and may lend its securities to minimize the difference in performance that naturally exists between an index fund and its corresponding index. The fund does not hedge its exposure to foreign currencies.
Because it may not be possible or practicable to purchase all of the stocks in the Index, the Adviser seeks to track the total return of the Index by using statistical sampling techniques. These techniques involve investing in a limited number of Index securities which, when taken together, are expected to perform similarly to the Index as a whole. These techniques are based on a variety of factors, including performance attributes, tax considerations, capitalization, dividend yield, price/earnings ratio, industry factors, risk factors and other characteristics. The fund generally expects that its portfolio will hold less than the total number of securities in the Index, but reserves the right to hold as many securities as it believes necessary to achieve the funds investment objective. The fund generally expects that its industry weightings, dividend yield and price/earnings ratio will be similar to those of the Index.
The fund will concentrate its investments ( i.e. , hold 25% or more of its total assets) in a particular industry, group of industries or sector to approximately the same extent that the Index is so concentrated. For purposes of this limitation, securities of the U.S. government (including its agencies and instrumentalities), and repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. government securities are not considered to be issued by members of any industry.
The Adviser seeks to achieve, over time, a correlation between the funds performance and that of the Index, before fees and expenses, of 95% or better. However, there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve a high degree of correlation with the Index. A number of factors may affect the funds ability to achieve a high correlation with the Index, including the number of Index securities held by the fund as part of the sampling technique. The correlation between the performance of the fund and the Index may also diverge due to transaction costs, asset valuations, corporate actions (such as mergers and spin-offs), timing variances, and differences between the funds portfolio and the Index resulting from legal restrictions (such as diversification requirements) that apply to the fund but not to the Index.
Principal risks
The fund is subject to risks, any of which could cause an investor to lose money. The funds principal risks include:
Market Risk. Stock markets rise and fall daily. As with any investment whose performance is tied to these markets, the value of
your investment in the fund will fluctuate, which means that you could lose money.
Investment Style Risk. The fund is not actively managed. Therefore, the fund follows the securities included in the index during upturns as well as downturns. Because of its indexing strategy, the fund does not take steps to reduce market exposure or to lessen the effects of a declining market. In addition, because of the funds expenses, the funds performance may be below that of the index.
Equity Risk. The prices of equity securities rise and fall daily. These price movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, industries or the securities market as a whole. In addition, equity markets tend to move in cycles, which may cause stock prices to fall over short or extended periods of time.
Small-Cap Risk. Historically, small-cap stocks have been riskier than large-stocks, and their prices may move sharply, especially during market upturns and downturns. Small-cap companies may be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic events than larger, more established companies. During a period when small-cap stocks fall behind other types of investments large-cap stocks, for instance the funds small-cap holdings could reduce performance.
Foreign Investment Risk. The funds investments in securities of foreign issuers may involve certain risks that are greater than those associated with investments in securities of U.S. issuers. These include risks of adverse changes in foreign economic, political, regulatory and other conditions; changes in currency exchange rates or exchange control regulations (including limitations on currency movements and exchanges); differing accounting, auditing, financial reporting and legal standards and practices; differing securities market structures; and higher transaction costs. Foreign securities also include ADRs, GDRs, and EDRs, which are receipts issued by U.S. and foreign banks that represent shares of foreign-based corporations. Investment in ADRs, GDRs and EDRs may be less liquid than the underlying shares in their primary trading market and GDRs, many of which are issued by companies in emerging markets, may be more volatile. To the extent the funds investments in a single country or a limited number of countries represent a larger percentage of the funds assets, the funds performance may be adversely affected by the economic, political and social conditions in those countries and it may be subject to increased price volatility.
Sampling Index Tracking Risk. The fund may not fully replicate the index and may hold securities not included in the index. As a result, the fund is subject to the risk that the advisers investment management strategy, the implementation of which is subject to a number of constraints, may not produce the intended results. Because the fund utilizes a sampling approach it may not track the return of the index as well as it would if the fund purchased all of the securities in its benchmark index.
14 | Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF |
Tracking Error Risk. As an index fund, the fund seeks to track the performance of its benchmark index, although it may not be successful in doing so. The divergence between the performance of the fund and its benchmark index, positive or negative, is called tracking error. Tracking error can be caused by many factors and it may be significant.
Derivatives Risk. The funds use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments and could cause the fund to lose more than the principal amount invested. In addition, investments in derivatives may involve leverage, which means a small percentage of assets invested in derivatives can have a disproportionately larger impact on the fund.
Liquidity Risk. A particular investment may be difficult to purchase or sell. The fund may be unable to sell a security at an advantageous time or price.
Securities Lending Risk. Securities lending involves the risk of loss of rights in the collateral or delay in recovery of the collateral if the borrower fails to return the security loaned or becomes insolvent.
Concentration Risk. To the extent that the funds or the indexs portfolio is concentrated in the securities of issuers in a particular market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class, the fund may be adversely affected by the performance of those securities, may be subject to increased price volatility and may be more susceptible to adverse economic, market, political or regulatory occurrences affecting that market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class.
Market Trading Risk. Although fund shares are listed on national securities exchanges, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for fund shares will develop or be maintained. If an active market is not maintained, investors may find it difficult to buy or sell fund shares.
Shares of the Fund May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV. Fund shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of the shares of the fund will approximate the funds net asset value (NAV), there may be times when the market price and the NAV vary significantly. You may pay more than NAV when you buy shares of the fund in the secondary market, and you may receive less than NAV when you sell those shares in the secondary market.
Lack of Governmental Insurance or Guarantee. An investment in the fund is not a bank deposit and it is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
For more information on the risks of investing in the fund please see the Fund details section in the prospectus.
Performance
The fund is new and therefore does not have a performance history. Once the fund has completed a full calendar year of operations a bar chart and table will be included that will provide some indication of the risks of investing in the fund by showing the variability of the funds returns and comparing the funds performance to the index.
Investment adviser
Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.
Portfolio managers
Agnes Hong, CFA, Managing Director and Head of Passive Equity Strategies, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. She has managed the fund since inception.
Chuck Craig, CFA, Managing Director and Senior Portfolio Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. He has managed the fund since inception.
Jane Qin , Portfolio Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. She has managed the fund since inception.
Purchase and sale of fund shares
The fund issues and redeems shares at its NAV only in large blocks of shares, typically 100,000 shares or more (Creation Units). These transactions are usually in exchange for a basket of securities included in the index and/or an amount of cash. As a practical matter, only institutions or large investors purchase or redeem Creation Units. Except when aggregated in Creation Units, shares of the fund are not redeemable securities.
Individual shares of the fund trade on national securities exchanges and elsewhere during the trading day and can only be bought and sold at market prices throughout the trading day through a broker-dealer. Because fund shares trade at market prices rather than NAV, shares may trade at a price greater than NAV (premium) or less than NAV (discount).
Tax information
Dividends and capital gains distributions received from the fund will generally be taxable as ordinary income or capital gains, unless you are investing through an IRA, 401(k) or other tax-advantaged account.
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF | 15 |
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
Ticker Symbol: FNDE
Investment objective
The funds goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index.
Fund fees and expenses
This table describes the fees and expenses you may pay if you buy and hold shares of the fund. The table does not reflect brokerage commissions you may incur when buying or selling fund shares.
Example |
This example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the fund with the cost of investing in other funds. The example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the fund for the time periods indicated and then redeem all of your shares at the end of those time periods. The example also assumes that your investment has a 5% return each year and that the funds operating expenses remain the same. This example does not reflect any brokerage commissions you may incur when buying or selling fund shares. Your actual costs may be higher or lower.
Expenses on a $10,000 investment |
1 year | 3 years | |
$47 | $148 |
Portfolio turnover |
The fund pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or turns over its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover may indicate higher transaction costs and may result in
higher taxes when fund shares are held in a taxable account. These costs, which are not reflected in the annual fund operating expenses or in the example, affect the funds performance. The fund is new and therefore does not have a historical portfolio turnover rate.
Principal investment strategies
To pursue its goal, the fund generally invests in stocks that are included in the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index 1 (the Index). The Index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The Index measures the performance of the large company size segment by fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies included in the Russell Emerging Markets Index (the Russell Index). Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Index. Companies with weights above 87.5% make up the Index. The weights of the companies included in the Index are determined annually and are implemented using a partial quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. The Index is compiled and calculated by Russell Investments in conjunction with Research Affiliates LLC, and the method of calculating the components of the Index is subject to change.
It is the funds policy that, under normal circumstances, it will invest at least 80% of its net assets in stocks included in the Index, including depositary receipts representing securities of the Index; which may be in the form of American Depositary receipts (ADRs), Global Depositary receipts (GDRs) and European Depositary receipts (EDRs). The fund will notify its shareholders at least 60 days before changing this policy. The fund may sell securities that are represented in the Index in anticipation of their removal from the Index, or buy securities that are not yet represented in the Index in anticipation of their addition to the Index.
1 |
Index ownership Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index is a joint trademark of Russell Investments (Russell) and Research Affiliates LLC (RA) and is used by the fund under license. Research Affiliates and Fundamental Index are trademarks of RA. Subject to RAs intellectual property rights in certain content, Russell is the owner of all copyrights related to the Russell Fundamental Indexes. Russell is the owner of the trademarks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Russell or RA, and Russell and RA do not make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in shares of the fund. |
16 | Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF |
Under normal circumstances, the fund may invest up to 20% of its net assets in securities not included in the Index. The principal types of these investments include those that the Adviser believes will help the fund track the Index, such as investments in (a) securities that are not represented in the Index but the Adviser anticipates will be added to the Index or as necessary to reflect various corporate actions (such as mergers and spin-offs), (b) other investment companies, and (c) derivatives, principally futures contracts. The fund may use futures contracts and other derivatives primarily to (a) seek returns on the funds otherwise uninvested cash assets to help it better track the Index and (b) obtain exposure substantially similar to that provided by certain securities included in the Index which the fund may not be able to purchase or hold directly due to restrictions and/or regulations on investments in the applicable local markets. The fund may also invest in cash and cash equivalents, and may lend its securities to minimize the difference in performance that naturally exists between an index fund and its corresponding index. The fund does not hedge its exposure to foreign currencies.
Because it may not be possible or practicable to purchase all of the stocks in the Index, the Adviser seeks to track the total return of the Index by using statistical sampling techniques. These techniques involve investing in a limited number of Index securities which, when taken together, are expected to perform similarly to the Index as a whole. These techniques are based on a variety of factors, including performance attributes, tax considerations, capitalization, dividend yield, price/earnings ratio, industry factors, risk factors and other characteristics. The fund generally expects that its portfolio will hold less than the total number of securities in the Index, but reserves the right to hold as many securities as it believes necessary to achieve the funds investment objective. The fund generally expects that its industry weightings, dividend yield and price/earnings ratio will be similar to those of the Index.
The fund will concentrate its investments ( i.e. , hold 25% or more of its total assets) in a particular industry, group of industries or sector to approximately the same extent that the Index is so concentrated. For purposes of this limitation, securities of the U.S. government (including its agencies and instrumentalities), and repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. government securities are not considered to be issued by members of any industry.
The Adviser seeks to achieve, over time, a correlation between the funds performance and that of the Index, before fees and expenses, of 95% or better. However, there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve a high degree of correlation with the Index. A number of factors may affect the funds ability to achieve a high correlation with the Index, including the number of Index securities held by the fund as part of the sampling technique. The correlation between the performance of the fund and the Index may also diverge due to transaction costs, asset valuations, corporate actions (such as mergers and spin-offs), timing variances, and differences between the funds portfolio and the Index resulting from legal restrictions (such as diversification requirements) that apply to the fund but not to the Index.
Principal risks
The fund is subject to risks, any of which could cause an investor to lose money. The funds principal risks include:
Market Risk. Stock markets rise and fall daily. As with any investment whose performance is tied to these markets, the value of your investment in the fund will fluctuate, which means that you could lose money.
Investment Style Risk. The fund is not actively managed. Therefore, the fund follows the securities included in the index during upturns as well as downturns. Because of its indexing strategy, the fund does not take steps to reduce market exposure or to lessen the effects of a declining market. In addition, because of the funds expenses, the funds performance may be below that of the index.
Equity Risk. The prices of equity securities rise and fall daily. These price movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, industries or the securities market as a whole. In addition, equity markets tend to move in cycles, which may cause stock prices to fall over short or extended periods of time.
Large-Cap Risk. Large-cap stocks tend to go in and out of favor based on market and economic conditions. During a period when large-cap U.S. stocks fall behind other types of investments small-cap stocks, for instance the funds large-cap holdings could reduce performance.
Foreign Investment Risk. The funds investments in securities of foreign issuers may involve certain risks that are greater than those associated with investments in securities of U.S. issuers. These include risks of adverse changes in foreign economic, political, regulatory and other conditions; changes in currency exchange rates or exchange control regulations (including limitations on currency movements and exchanges); differing accounting, auditing, financial reporting and legal standards and practices; differing securities market structures; and higher transaction costs. These risks may be heightened in connection with investments in emerging markets. Foreign securities also include ADRs, GDRs, and EDRs, which are receipts issued by U.S. and foreign banks that represent shares of foreign-based corporations. Investment in ADRs, GDRs and EDRs may be less liquid than the underlying shares in their primary trading market and GDRs, many of which are issued by companies in emerging markets, may be more volatile. To the extent the funds investments in a single country or a limited number of countries represent a larger percentage of the funds assets, the funds performance may be adversely affected by the economic, political and social conditions in those countries and it may be subject to increased price volatility.
Emerging Markets Risk. Emerging market countries may be more likely to experience political turmoil or rapid changes in market or economic conditions than more developed countries. Such countries often have less uniformity in accounting and reporting requirements and greater risk associated with the custody of securities. In addition, the financial stability of issuers (including governments) in emerging market countries may be more
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF | 17 |
precarious than in other countries. As a result, there will tend to be an increased risk of price volatility associated with the funds investments in emerging market countries, and, at times, it may be difficult to value such investments.
Sampling Index Tracking Risk. The fund may not fully replicate the index and may hold securities not included in the index. As a result, the fund is subject to the risk that the advisers investment management strategy, the implementation of which is subject to a number of constraints, may not produce the intended results. Because the fund utilizes a sampling approach it may not track the return of the index as well as it would if the fund purchased all of the securities in its benchmark index.
Tracking Error Risk. As an index fund, the fund seeks to track the performance of its benchmark index, although it may not be successful in doing so. The divergence between the performance of the fund and its benchmark index, positive or negative, is called tracking error. Tracking error can be caused by many factors and it may be significant.
Derivatives Risk. The funds use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments and could cause the fund to lose more than the principal amount invested. In addition, investments in derivatives may involve leverage, which means a small percentage of assets invested in derivatives can have a disproportionately larger impact on the fund.
Liquidity Risk. A particular investment may be difficult to purchase or sell. The fund may be unable to sell a security at an advantageous time or price.
Securities Lending Risk. Securities lending involves the risk of loss of rights in the collateral or delay in recovery of the collateral if the borrower fails to return the security loaned or becomes insolvent.
Concentration Risk. To the extent that the funds or the indexs portfolio is concentrated in the securities of issuers in a particular market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class, the fund may be adversely affected by the performance of those securities, may be subject to increased price volatility and may be more susceptible to adverse economic, market, political or regulatory occurrences affecting that market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class.
Market Trading Risk. Although fund shares are listed on national securities exchanges, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for fund shares will develop or be maintained. If an active market is not maintained, investors may find it difficult to buy or sell fund shares.
Shares of the Fund May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV. Fund shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of the shares of the fund will approximate the funds net asset value (NAV), there may be times when the market price and the NAV vary significantly. You may pay more than NAV when you buy shares of
the fund in the secondary market, and you may receive less than NAV when you sell those shares in the secondary market.
Lack of Governmental Insurance or Guarantee. An investment in the fund is not a bank deposit and it is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
For more information on the risks of investing in the fund please see the Fund details section in the prospectus.
Performance
The fund is new and therefore does not have a performance history. Once the fund has completed a full calendar year of operations a bar chart and table will be included that will provide some indication of the risks of investing in the fund by showing the variability of the funds returns and comparing the funds performance to the index.
Investment adviser
Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.
Portfolio managers
Agnes Hong, CFA, Managing Director and Head of Passive Equity Strategies, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. She has managed the fund since inception.
Chuck Craig, CFA, Managing Director and Senior Portfolio Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. He has managed the fund since inception.
Jane Qin , Portfolio Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the fund. She has managed the fund since inception.
Purchase and sale of fund shares
The fund issues and redeems shares at its NAV only in large blocks of shares, typically 100,000 shares or more (Creation Units). These transactions are usually in exchange for a basket of securities included in the index and/or an amount of cash. As a practical matter, only institutions or large investors purchase or redeem Creation Units. Except when aggregated in Creation Units, shares of the fund are not redeemable securities.
Individual shares of the fund trade on national securities exchanges and elsewhere during the trading day and can only be bought and sold at market prices throughout the trading day through a broker-dealer. Because fund shares trade at market prices rather than NAV, shares may trade at a price greater than NAV (premium) or less than NAV (discount).
Tax information
Dividends and capital gains distributions received from the fund will generally be taxable as ordinary income or capital gains, unless you are investing through an IRA, 401(k) or other tax-advantaged account.
18 | Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF |
The funds described in this Prospectus are advised by Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. (CSIM or the investment adviser). Each of the funds is an exchange-traded fund (ETF). ETFs are funds that trade like other publicly-traded securities.
The funds in this prospectus are index funds and share the same basic investment strategy: each of the funds tracks a Russell Fundamental Index ® which is based on the Fundamental Index methodology. This strategy distinguishes an index fund from an actively managed fund. Instead of choosing investments for the fund based on portfolio managements judgment, an index is used to determine which securities the fund should own.
In contrast to most equity indices, which generally are based on market capitalization, the Russell Fundamental Index ® Series selects and weights stocks according to fundamental measures of company size: adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks. For companies that have never paid dividends, that measure is excluded from the average. The Russell Fundamental Index Series determines constituent weights annually in June. The weights are then implemented using a quarterly reconstitution methodology that rebalances four equal segments on a rolling quarterly basis. Splitting the index into four equivalent parts (tranches) adds investment capacity.
The Russell Fundamental Index Series is created from the leading Russell 3000 ® and Russell Global ex-U.S. indexes. Constituents are scored and weighted based on fundamental measures of company size, then further divided, as appropriate, into large company and small company fundamental indexes. Company size is determined by averaging three key non-price measures using publically available accounting data from the last five years. Each Russell Fundamental Index is compiled and calculated by Russell Investments in conjunction with Research Affiliates LLC (RA), and the method of calculating the components of the indices is subject to change. Weights are calculated and assigned by RA.
Because the composition of an index tends to be comparatively stable, most index funds historically have shown low portfolio turnover compared to actively managed funds.
Unlike shares of a mutual fund, shares of the funds are listed on a national securities exchange and trade at market prices that change throughout the day. The market price for each of the funds shares may be different from its net asset value per share or NAV. The funds have their own CUSIP numbers and trade on the NYSE Arca, Inc. under the following tickers:
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF |
FNDB | |||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF |
FNDX | |||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF |
FNDA | |||
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF |
FNDF | |||
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF |
FNDC | |||
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF |
FNDE |
The funds issue and redeem shares at their NAV only in large blocks of shares, typically 50,000 shares or more (Creation Units). These transactions are usually in exchange for a basket of securities and/or an amount of cash. As a practical matter, only institutions or large investors purchase or redeem Creation Units. Except when aggregated in Creation Units, shares of the funds are not redeemable securities.
A note to retail investors
Shares can be purchased directly from the funds only in exchange for a basket of securities and/or an amount of cash that is expected to be worth a minimum of a million or more dollars. Most individual investors, therefore, will not be able to purchase shares directly from the funds. Instead, these investors will purchase shares in the secondary market through a brokerage account or with the assistance of a broker. Thus, some of the information contained in this Prospectus such as information about purchasing and redeeming shares from the funds and references to transaction fees imposed on purchases and redemptions is not relevant to most individual investors. Shares purchased or sold through a brokerage account or with the assistance of a broker may be subject to brokerage commissions and charges.
Except as explicitly described otherwise, the investment objective and the investment policies of each of the funds may be changed without shareholder approval.
The funds performance will fluctuate over time and, as with all investments, future performance may differ from past performance.
About the funds | 19 |
Investment objectives, strategies and risks
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Investment objective
The Funds goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Index. The funds investment objective is not fundamental and therefore may be changed by the funds board of trustees without shareholder approval.
Index
The Russell Fundamental U.S. Index (the Index) selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, operating cash flow, and dividends plus buyback rather than market capitalization. The Index measures the performance of the constituent companies by fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies included in the Russell 3000 ® Index (the Russell Index). Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Index. The weights of the companies included in the Index are determined annually and are implemented using a partial quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. As of July 31, 2013, the Index consisted of 1,480 constituent companies which had an average market capitalization of $12.02 billion (the market capitalization of the constituent companies ranged from $115.48 million to $424.74 billion.) The Index is compiled and calculated by Russell Investments in conjunction with Research Affiliates LLC, and the method of calculating the components of the Index is subject to change.
More about the funds principal investment risks
The fund is subject to risks, any of which could cause an investor to lose money.
Market Risk. Stock markets rise and fall daily. As with any investment whose performance is tied to these markets, the value of your investment in the fund will fluctuate, which means that you could lose money.
Investment Style Risk. The fund is not actively managed. Therefore, the fund follows the stocks included in the index during upturns as well as downturns. Because of its indexing strategy, the fund does not take steps to reduce market exposure or to lessen the effects of a declining market. In addition, because of the funds expenses, the funds performance may be below that of the index.
Equity Risk. The prices of equity securities rise and fall daily. These price movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, industries or the securities market as a whole. Individual companies may report poor results or be negatively affected by industry and/or economic trends and developments. The prices of securities issued by such companies may suffer a decline in response. In addition, the equity market tends to move in cycles which may cause stock prices to fall over short or extended periods of time.
Large-Cap and Mid-Cap Risk. Although the index encompasses stocks from many different sectors of the economy, its performance primarily reflects that of large- and mid-cap segments of the U.S. stock market. Both large- and mid-cap stocks tend to go in and out of favor based on market and economic conditions. However, stocks of mid-cap companies tend to be more volatile than those of large-cap companies because mid-cap companies tend to be more susceptible to adverse business or economic events than larger more established companies. During a period when large- and mid-cap U.S. stocks fall behind other types of investments bonds or small-cap stocks, for instance the funds performance also will lag those investments.
Small-Cap Risk. Historically, small-cap stocks have been riskier than large-cap stocks. Stock prices of smaller companies may be based in substantial part on future expectations rather than current achievements and may move sharply, especially during market upturns and downturns. Small-cap companies themselves may be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic events than larger, more established companies. During a period when small-cap stocks fall behind other types of investments bonds or large-cap stocks, for instance the funds performance also will lag those investments.
Sampling Index Tracking Risk. The fund may not fully replicate the index and may hold securities not included in the index. As a result, the fund is subject to the risk that the Advisers investment management strategy, the implementation of which is subject to a number of constraints, may not produce the intended results. Because the fund utilizes a sampling approach it may not track the return of the index as well as it would if the fund purchased all of the equity securities in the index.
Tracking Error Risk. As an index fund, the fund seeks to track the performance of its benchmark index, although it may not be successful in doing so. The divergence between the performance of the fund and its benchmark index, positive or negative, is called tracking error. Tracking error can be caused by many factors and it may be significant. For example, the fund may not invest in certain securities in its benchmark index, match the securities weighting to the benchmark, or the fund may invest in securities not in the index, due to regulatory,
20 | Fund details |
operational, custodial or liquidity constraints; corporate transactions; asset valuations; transaction costs and timing; tax considerations; and index rebalancing, which may result in tracking error. The fund may attempt to offset the effects of not being invested in certain index securities by making substitute investments, but these efforts may not be successful. In addition, cash flows into and out of the fund, operating expenses and trading costs all affect the ability of the fund to match the performance of its benchmark index, because the benchmark index does not have to manage cash flows and does not incur any costs.
Derivatives Risk. The fund may invest in derivative instruments. The principal types of derivatives the fund may use are futures contracts. A futures contract is an agreement to buy or sell a financial instrument at a specific price on a specific day. The funds use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Certain of these risks, such as leverage risk, market risk and liquidity risk, are discussed elsewhere in this section. The funds use of derivatives is also subject to credit risk, lack of availability risk, valuation risk, correlation risk and tax risk. Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty to a derivative transaction may not fulfill its contractual obligations. Lack of availability risk is the risk that suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances for risk management or other purposes. Valuation risk is the risk that a particular derivative may be valued incorrectly. Correlation risk is the risk that changes in the value of the derivative may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate or index. Tax risk is the risk that the use of derivatives may cause the fund to realize higher amounts of short-term capital gain. These risks could cause the fund to lose more than the principal amount invested.
Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk exists when particular investments are difficult to purchase or sell. The market for certain investments may become illiquid due to specific adverse changes in the conditions of a particular issuer or under adverse market or economic conditions independent of the issuer. The funds investments in illiquid securities may reduce the returns of the fund because it may be unable to sell a security at an advantageous time or price. Further, transactions in illiquid securities may entail transaction costs that are higher than those for transactions in liquid securities.
Leverage Risk. Certain fund transactions, such as derivatives, may give rise to a form of leverage and may expose the fund to greater risk. Leverage tends to magnify the effect of any decrease or increase in the value of the funds portfolio securities. The use of leverage may cause the fund to liquidate portfolio positions when it would not be advantageous to do so in order to satisfy its obligations.
Securities Lending Risk. The fund may lend its portfolio securities to brokers, dealers, and other financial institutions provided a number of conditions are satisfied, including that the loan is fully collateralized. When the fund lends portfolio securities, its investment performance will continue to reflect changes in the value of the securities loaned, and the fund will also receive a fee or interest on the collateral. Securities lending involves the risk of loss of rights in the collateral or delay in recovery of the collateral if the borrower fails to return the security loaned or becomes insolvent. The fund will also bear the risk of any decline in value of securities acquired with cash collateral. The fund may pay lending fees to a party arranging the loan.
Concentration Risk. To the extent that the funds or the indexs portfolio is concentrated in the securities of issuers in a particular market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class, the fund may be adversely affected by the performance of those securities, may be subject to increased price volatility and may be more susceptible to adverse economic, market, political or regulatory occurrences affecting that market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class.
Market Trading Risk. Although fund shares are listed on national securities exchanges, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for fund shares will develop or be maintained. If an active market is not maintained, investors may find it difficult to buy or sell fund shares. Trading of shares of the fund on a stock exchange may be halted if exchange officials deem such action appropriate, if the fund is delisted, or if the activation of marketwide circuit breakers halts stock trading generally. If the funds shares are delisted, the fund may seek to list its shares on another market, merge with another ETF, or redeem its shares at NAV.
Shares of the Fund May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV. As with all ETFs, fund shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of the shares of the fund will approximate the funds NAV, there may be times when the market price and the NAV vary significantly. Thus, you may pay more than NAV when you buy shares of the fund in the secondary market, and you may receive less than NAV when you sell those shares in the secondary market.
The market price of fund shares during the trading day, like the price of any exchange-traded security, includes a bid/ask spread charged by the exchange specialist, market makers or other participants that trade the fund shares. The bid/ask spread on ETF shares varies over time and is generally larger when the ETFs shares have little trading volume or market liquidity. In addition, in times of severe market disruption, the bid/ask spread can increase significantly. At those times, fund shares are most likely to be traded at a discount to NAV, and the discount is likely to be greatest when the price of shares is falling fastest, which may be the time that you most want to sell your shares. The Adviser believes that, under normal market conditions, large market price discounts or premiums to NAV will not be sustained because of arbitrage opportunities.
Lack of Governmental Insurance or Guarantee. An investment in the fund is not a bank deposit and it is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
Fund details | 21 |
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Investment objective
The Funds goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index. The funds investment objective is not fundamental and therefore may be changed by the funds board of trustees without shareholder approval.
Index
The Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index (the Index) selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The Index measures the performance of the large company size segment by fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies included in the Russell 3000 ® Index (the Russell Index). Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Index. Companies with weights above 87.5% make up the Index. The weights of the companies included in the Index are determined annually and are implemented using a partial quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. As of July 31, 2013, the Index consisted of 612 constituent companies which had an average market capitalization of $25.17 billion (the market capitalization of the constituent companies ranged from $272.14 million to $424.74 billion.) The Index is compiled and calculated by Russell Investments in conjunction with Research Affiliates LLC, and the method of calculating the components of the Index is subject to change.
More about the funds principal investment risks
The fund is subject to risks, any of which could cause an investor to lose money.
Market Risk. Stock markets rise and fall daily. As with any investment whose performance is tied to these markets, the value of your investment in the fund will fluctuate, which means that you could lose money.
Investment Style Risk. The fund is not actively managed. Therefore, the fund follows the stocks included in the index during upturns as well as downturns. Because of its indexing strategy, the fund does not take steps to reduce market exposure or to lessen the effects of a declining market. In addition, because of the funds expenses, the funds performance may be below that of the index.
Equity Risk. The prices of equity securities rise and fall daily. These price movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, industries or the securities market as a whole. Individual companies may report poor results or be negatively affected by industry and/or economic trends and developments. The prices of securities issued by such companies may suffer a decline in response. In addition, the equity market tends to move in cycles which may cause stock prices to fall over short or extended periods of time.
Large-Cap Risk. Large-cap stocks tend to go in and out of favor based on market and economic conditions. During a period when large-cap U.S. stocks fall behind other types of investments small-cap stocks, for instance the funds large-cap holdings could reduce performance.
Tracking Error Risk. As an index fund, the fund seeks to track the performance of its benchmark index, although it may not be successful in doing so. The divergence between the performance of the fund and its benchmark index, positive or negative, is called tracking error. Tracking error can be caused by many factors and it may be significant. For example, the fund may not invest in certain securities in its benchmark index, match the securities weighting to the benchmark, or the fund may invest in securities not in the index, due to regulatory, operational, custodial or liquidity constraints; corporate transactions; asset valuations; transaction costs and timing; tax considerations; and index rebalancing, which may result in tracking error. The fund may attempt to offset the effects of not being invested in certain index securities by making substitute investments, but these efforts may not be successful. In addition, cash flows into and out of the fund, operating expenses and trading costs all affect the ability of the fund to match the performance of its benchmark index, because the benchmark index does not have to manage cash flows and does not incur any costs.
Derivatives Risk. The fund may invest in derivative instruments. The principal types of derivatives the fund may use are futures contracts. A futures contract is an agreement to buy or sell a financial instrument at a specific price on a specific day. The funds use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Certain of these risks, such as leverage risk, market risk and liquidity risk, are discussed elsewhere in this section. The funds use of derivatives is also subject to credit risk, lack of availability risk, valuation risk, correlation risk and tax risk. Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty to a derivative transaction may not fulfill its contractual obligations. Lack of availability risk is the risk that suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances for risk management or other purposes. Valuation risk is the risk that a particular derivative may be valued incorrectly. Correlation risk is the risk that changes in the value of the derivative may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate or index. Tax risk is the risk that the use of derivatives may cause the fund to realize higher amounts of short-term capital gain. These risks could cause the fund to lose more than the principal amount invested.
22 | Fund details |
Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk exists when particular investments are difficult to purchase or sell. The market for certain investments may become illiquid due to specific adverse changes in the conditions of a particular issuer or under adverse market or economic conditions independent of the issuer. The funds investments in illiquid securities may reduce the returns of the fund because it may be unable to sell a security at an advantageous time or price. Further, transactions in illiquid securities may entail transaction costs that are higher than those for transactions in liquid securities.
Leverage Risk. Certain fund transactions, such as derivatives, may give rise to a form of leverage and may expose the fund to greater risk. Leverage tends to magnify the effect of any decrease or increase in the value of the funds portfolio securities. The use of leverage may cause the fund to liquidate portfolio positions when it would not be advantageous to do so in order to satisfy its obligations.
Securities Lending Risk. The fund may lend its portfolio securities to brokers, dealers, and other financial institutions provided a number of conditions are satisfied, including that the loan is fully collateralized. When the fund lends portfolio securities, its investment performance will continue to reflect changes in the value of the securities loaned, and the fund will also receive a fee or interest on the collateral. Securities lending involves the risk of loss of rights in the collateral or delay in recovery of the collateral if the borrower fails to return the security loaned or becomes insolvent. The fund will also bear the risk of any decline in value of securities acquired with cash collateral. The fund may pay lending fees to a party arranging the loan.
Concentration Risk. To the extent that the funds or the indexs portfolio is concentrated in the securities of issuers in a particular market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class, the fund may be adversely affected by the performance of those securities, may be subject to increased price volatility and may be more susceptible to adverse economic, market, political or regulatory occurrences affecting that market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class.
Market Trading Risk. Although fund shares are listed on national securities exchanges, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for fund shares will develop or be maintained. If an active market is not maintained, investors may find it difficult to buy or sell fund shares. Trading of shares of the fund on a stock exchange may be halted if exchange officials deem such action appropriate, if the fund is delisted, or if the activation of marketwide circuit breakers halts stock trading generally. If the funds shares are delisted, the fund may seek to list its shares on another market, merge with another ETF, or redeem its shares at NAV.
Shares of the Fund May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV. As with all ETFs, fund shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of the shares of the fund will approximate the funds NAV, there may be times when the market price and the NAV vary significantly. Thus, you may pay more than NAV when you buy shares of the fund in the secondary market, and you may receive less than NAV when you sell those shares in the secondary market.
The market price of fund shares during the trading day, like the price of any exchange-traded security, includes a bid/ask spread charged by the exchange specialist, market makers or other participants that trade the fund shares. The bid/ask spread on ETF shares varies over time and is generally larger when the ETFs shares have little trading volume or market liquidity. In addition, in times of severe market disruption, the bid/ask spread can increase significantly. At those times, fund shares are most likely to be traded at a discount to NAV, and the discount is likely to be greatest when the price of shares is falling fastest, which may be the time that you most want to sell your shares. The Adviser believes that, under normal market conditions, large market price discounts or premiums to NAV will not be sustained because of arbitrage opportunities.
Lack of Governmental Insurance or Guarantee. An investment in the fund is not a bank deposit and it is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Investment objective
The Funds goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index. The funds investment objective is not fundamental and therefore may be changed by the funds board of trustees without shareholder approval.
Index
The Russell Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index (the Index) selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The Index measures the performance of the small company size segment by fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies included in the Russell 3000 ® Index (the Russell Index). Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Index. Companies with weights below the 87.5% mark make up the Index. The weights of the companies included in the Index are determined annually and are implemented using a quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. As of July 31, 2013, the Index consisted of 868 constituent companies which had an average market capitalization of
Fund details | 23 |
$2.75 billion (the market capitalization of the constituent companies ranged from $115.48 million to $62.75 billion.) The Index is compiled and calculated by Russell Investments in conjunction with Research Affiliates LLC, and the method of calculating the components of the Index is subject to change.
More about the funds principal investment risks
The fund is subject to risks, any of which could cause an investor to lose money.
Market Risk. Stock markets rise and fall daily. As with any investment whose performance is tied to these markets, the value of your investment in the fund will fluctuate, which means that you could lose money.
Investment Style Risk. The fund is not actively managed. Therefore, the fund follows the stocks included in the index during upturns as well as downturns. Because of its indexing strategy, the fund does not take steps to reduce market exposure or to lessen the effects of a declining market. In addition, because of the funds expenses, the funds performance may be below that of the index.
Equity Risk. The prices of equity securities rise and fall daily. These price movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, industries or the securities market as a whole. Individual companies may report poor results or be negatively affected by industry and/or economic trends and developments. The prices of securities issued by such companies may suffer a decline in response. In addition, the equity market tends to move in cycles which may cause stock prices to fall over short or extended periods of time.
Small-Cap Risk. Historically, small-cap stocks have been riskier than largecap stocks. Stock prices of smaller companies may be based in substantial part on future expectations rather than current achievements and may move sharply, especially during market upturns and downturns. Small-cap companies themselves may be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic events than larger, more established companies. During a period when small-cap stocks fall behind other types of investments bonds or large-cap stocks, for instance the funds performance also will lag those investments.
Tracking Error Risk. As an index fund, the fund seeks to track the performance of its benchmark index, although it may not be successful in doing so. The divergence between the performance of the fund and its benchmark index, positive or negative, is called tracking error. Tracking error can be caused by many factors and it may be significant. For example, the fund may not invest in certain securities in its benchmark index, match the securities weighting to the benchmark, or the fund may invest in securities not in the index, due to regulatory, operational, custodial or liquidity constraints; corporate transactions; asset valuations; transaction costs and timing; tax considerations; and index rebalancing, which may result in tracking error. The fund may attempt to offset the effects of not being invested in certain index securities by making substitute investments, but these efforts may not be successful. In addition, cash flows into and out of the fund, operating expenses and trading costs all affect the ability of the fund to match the performance of its benchmark index, because the benchmark index does not have to manage cash flows and does not incur any costs.
Derivatives Risk. The fund may invest in derivative instruments. The principal types of derivatives the fund may use are futures contracts. A futures contract is an agreement to buy or sell a financial instrument at a specific price on a specific day. The funds use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Certain of these risks, such as leverage risk, market risk and liquidity risk, are discussed elsewhere in this section. The funds use of derivatives is also subject to credit risk, lack of availability risk, valuation risk, correlation risk and tax risk. Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty to a derivative transaction may not fulfill its contractual obligations. Lack of availability risk is the risk that suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances for risk management or other purposes. Valuation risk is the risk that a particular derivative may be valued incorrectly. Correlation risk is the risk that changes in the value of the derivative may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate or index. Tax risk is the risk that the use of derivatives may cause the fund to realize higher amounts of short-term capital gain. These risks could cause the fund to lose more than the principal amount invested.
Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk exists when particular investments are difficult to purchase or sell. The market for certain investments may become illiquid due to specific adverse changes in the conditions of a particular issuer or under adverse market or economic conditions independent of the issuer. The funds investments in illiquid securities may reduce the returns of the fund because it may be unable to sell a security at an advantageous time or price. Further, transactions in illiquid securities may entail transaction costs that are higher than those for transactions in liquid securities.
Leverage Risk. Certain fund transactions, such as derivatives, may give rise to a form of leverage and may expose the fund to greater risk. Leverage tends to magnify the effect of any decrease or increase in the value of the funds portfolio securities. The use of leverage may cause the fund to liquidate portfolio positions when it would not be advantageous to do so in order to satisfy its obligations.
Securities Lending Risk. The fund may lend its portfolio securities to brokers, dealers, and other financial institutions provided a number of conditions are satisfied, including that the loan is fully collateralized. When the fund lends portfolio securities, its investment performance will continue to reflect changes in the value of the securities loaned, and the fund will also receive a fee or interest on the collateral. Securities lending involves the risk of loss of rights in the collateral or delay in recovery of the collateral if the borrower fails to return the security
24 | Fund details |
loaned or becomes insolvent. The fund will also bear the risk of any decline in value of securities acquired with cash collateral. The fund may pay lending fees to a party arranging the loan.
Concentration Risk. To the extent that the funds or the indexs portfolio is concentrated in the securities of issuers in a particular market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class, the fund may be adversely affected by the performance of those securities, may be subject to increased price volatility and may be more susceptible to adverse economic, market, political or regulatory occurrences affecting that market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class.
Market Trading Risk. Although fund shares are listed on national securities exchanges, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for fund shares will develop or be maintained. If an active market is not maintained, investors may find it difficult to buy or sell fund shares. Trading of shares of the fund on a stock exchange may be halted if exchange officials deem such action appropriate, if the fund is delisted, or if the activation of marketwide circuit breakers halts stock trading generally. If the funds shares are delisted, the fund may seek to list its shares on another market, merge with another ETF, or redeem its shares at NAV.
Shares of the Fund May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV. As with all ETFs, fund shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of the shares of the fund will approximate the funds NAV, there may be times when the market price and the NAV vary significantly. Thus, you may pay more than NAV when you buy shares of the fund in the secondary market, and you may receive less than NAV when you sell those shares in the secondary market.
The market price of fund shares during the trading day, like the price of any exchange-traded security, includes a bid/ask spread charged by the exchange specialist, market makers or other participants that trade the fund shares. The bid/ask spread on ETF shares varies over time and is generally larger when the ETFs shares have little trading volume or market liquidity. In addition, in times of severe market disruption, the bid/ask spread can increase significantly. At those times, fund shares are most likely to be traded at a discount to NAV, and the discount is likely to be greatest when the price of shares is falling fastest, which may be the time that you most want to sell your shares. The Adviser believes that, under normal market conditions, large market price discounts or premiums to NAV will not be sustained because of arbitrage opportunities.
Lack of Governmental Insurance or Guarantee. An investment in the fund is not a bank deposit and it is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Investment objective
The Funds goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. The funds investment objective is not fundamental and therefore may be changed by the funds board of trustees without shareholder approval.
Index
The Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index (the Index) selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The Index measures the performance of the large company size segment by fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies included in the Russell Developed ex-U.S. Index (the Russell Index). Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Index. Companies with weights above 87.5% make up the Index. The weights of the companies included in the Index are determined annually and are implemented using a partial quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. As of July 31, 2013, the Index consisted of 781 constituent companies which had an average market capitalization of $15.55 billion (the market capitalization of the constituent companies ranged from $464.46 million to $217.61 billion.) The Index is compiled and calculated by Russell Investments in conjunction with Research Affiliates LLC, and the method of calculating the components of the Index is subject to change.
More about the funds principal investment risks
The fund is subject to risks, any of which could cause an investor to lose money.
Market Risk. Stock markets rise and fall daily. As with any investment whose performance is tied to these markets, the value of your investment in the fund will fluctuate, which means that you could lose money.
Investment Style Risk. The fund is not actively managed. Therefore, the fund follows the stocks included in the index during upturns as well as downturns. Because of its indexing strategy, the fund does not take steps to reduce market exposure or to lessen the effects of a declining market. In addition, because of the funds expenses, the funds performance may be below that of the index.
Equity Risk. The prices of equity securities rise and fall daily. These price movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, industries or the securities market as a whole. Individual companies may report poor results or be negatively affected by
Fund details | 25 |
industry and/or economic trends and developments. The prices of securities issued by such companies may suffer a decline in response. In addition, the equity market tends to move in cycles which may cause stock prices to fall over short or extended periods of time.
Large-Cap Risk. Large-cap stocks tend to go in and out of favor based on market and economic conditions. During a period when large-cap U.S. stocks fall behind other types of investments small-cap stocks, for instance the funds large-cap holdings could reduce performance.
Foreign Investment Risk. The funds investments in securities of foreign issuers involve certain risks that are greater than those associated with investments in securities of U.S. issuers. These include risks of adverse changes in foreign economic, political, regulatory and other conditions, or changes in currency exchange rates or exchange control regulations (including limitations on currency movements and exchanges). In certain countries, legal remedies available to investors may be more limited than those available with respect to investments in the United States. The securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and, at times, more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. The fund may also experience more rapid or extreme changes in value as compared to a fund that invests solely in securities of U.S. companies because the securities markets of many foreign countries are relatively small, with a limited number of companies representing a small number of industries. There also is the risk that the cost of buying, selling, and holding foreign securities, including brokerage, tax, and custody costs, may be higher than those involved in domestic transactions. These risks may be heightened in connection with investments in emerging markets.
Geographic Risk. To the extent the funds investments in a single country or a limited number of countries represent a higher percentage of the funds assets, the fund assumes the risk that economic, political and social conditions in those countries will have a significant impact on its investment performance and it may be subject to increased price volatility.
Depositary Receipt Risk. Foreign securities also include ADRs, which are U.S. dollar-denominated receipts representing shares of foreign based corporations. ADRs are issued by U.S. banks or trust companies, and entitle the holder to all dividends and capital gains that are paid out on the underlying foreign shares. Foreign securities also include GDRs, which are similar to ADRs, but are shares of foreign-based corporations generally issued by international banks in one or more markets around the world. In addition, foreign securities includes EDRs, similar to GDRs, are shares of foreign-based corporations generally issued by European banks that trade on exchanges outside of the banks home country. Investment in ADRs, GDRs and EDRs may be less liquid than the underlying shares in their primary trading market and GDRs, many of which are issued by companies in emerging markets, may be more volatile.
Currency Risk. As a result of its investments in securities denominated in, and/or receiving revenues in, foreign currencies, the fund will be subject to currency risk. This is the risk that those currencies will decline in value relative to the U.S. Dollar. In either event, the dollar value of an investment in the fund would be adversely affected. Currency exchange rates may fluctuate in response to factors extrinsic to that countrys economy, which makes the forecasting of currency market movements extremely difficult. Currency rates in foreign countries may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time for a number of reasons, including changes in interest rates, intervention (or failure to intervene) by U.S. or foreign governments, central banks or supranational entities such as the International Monetary Fund, or by the imposition of currency controls or other political developments in the United States or abroad. These can result in losses to the fund if it is unable to deliver or receive currency or funds in settlement of obligations. Forward contracts on foreign currencies are not traded on exchanges; rather, a bank or dealer will act as agent or as principal to make or take future delivery of a specified lot of a particular currency for the funds account. The fund is subject to the risk of a principals failure, inability or refusal to perform with respect to such contracts.
Sampling Index Tracking Risk. The fund may not fully replicate the index and may hold securities not included in the index. As a result, the fund is subject to the risk that the Advisers investment management strategy, the implementation of which is subject to a number of constraints, may not produce the intended results. Because the fund utilizes a sampling approach it may not track the return of the index as well as it would if the fund purchased all of the equity securities in the index.
Tracking Error Risk. As an index fund, the fund seeks to track the performance of its benchmark index, although it may not be successful in doing so. The divergence between the performance of the fund and its benchmark index, positive or negative, is called tracking error. Tracking error can be caused by many factors and it may be significant. For example, the fund may not invest in certain securities in its benchmark index, match the securities weighting to the benchmark, or the fund may invest in securities not in the index, due to regulatory, operational, custodial or liquidity constraints; corporate transactions; asset valuations; transaction costs and timing; tax considerations; and index rebalancing, which may result in tracking error. The fund may attempt to offset the effects of not being invested in certain index securities by making substitute investments, but these efforts may not be successful. In addition, cash flows into and out of the fund, operating expenses and trading costs all affect the ability of the fund to match the performance of its benchmark index, because the benchmark index does not have to manage cash flows and does not incur any costs.
Derivatives Risk. The fund may invest in derivative instruments. The principal types of derivatives the fund may use are futures contracts. A futures contract is an agreement to buy or sell a financial instrument at a specific price on a specific day. The funds use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Certain of these risks, such as leverage risk, market risk and liquidity risk, are discussed elsewhere in this section.
26 | Fund details |
The funds use of derivatives is also subject to credit risk, lack of availability risk, valuation risk, correlation risk and tax risk. Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty to a derivative transaction may not fulfill its contractual obligations. Lack of availability risk is the risk that suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances for risk management or other purposes. Valuation risk is the risk that a particular derivative may be valued incorrectly. Correlation risk is the risk that changes in the value of the derivative may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate or index. Tax risk is the risk that the use of derivatives may cause the fund to realize higher amounts of short-term capital gain. These risks could cause the fund to lose more than the principal amount invested.
Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk exists when particular investments are difficult to purchase or sell. The market for certain investments may become illiquid due to specific adverse changes in the conditions of a particular issuer or under adverse market or economic conditions independent of the issuer. The funds investments in illiquid securities may reduce the returns of the fund because it may be unable to sell a security at an advantageous time or price. Further, transactions in illiquid securities may entail transaction costs that are higher than those for transactions in liquid securities.
Leverage Risk. Certain fund transactions, such as derivatives, may give rise to a form of leverage and may expose the fund to greater risk. Leverage tends to magnify the effect of any decrease or increase in the value of the funds portfolio securities. The use of leverage may cause the fund to liquidate portfolio positions when it would not be advantageous to do so in order to satisfy its obligations.
Securities Lending Risk. The fund may lend its portfolio securities to brokers, dealers, and other financial institutions provided a number of conditions are satisfied, including that the loan is fully collateralized. When the fund lends portfolio securities, its investment performance will continue to reflect changes in the value of the securities loaned, and the fund will also receive a fee or interest on the collateral. Securities lending involves the risk of loss of rights in the collateral or delay in recovery of the collateral if the borrower fails to return the security loaned or becomes insolvent. The fund will also bear the risk of any decline in value of securities acquired with cash collateral. The fund may pay lending fees to a party arranging the loan.
Concentration Risk. To the extent that the funds or the indexs portfolio is concentrated in the securities of issuers in a particular market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class, the fund may be adversely affected by the performance of those securities, may be subject to increased price volatility and may be more susceptible to adverse economic, market, political or regulatory occurrences affecting that market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class.
Market Trading Risk. Although fund shares are listed on national securities exchanges, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for fund shares will develop or be maintained. If an active market is not maintained, investors may find it difficult to buy or sell fund shares. Trading of shares of the fund on a stock exchange may be halted if exchange officials deem such action appropriate, if the fund is delisted, or if the activation of marketwide circuit breakers halts stock trading generally. If the funds shares are delisted, the fund may seek to list its shares on another market, merge with another ETF, or redeem its shares at NAV.
Shares of the Fund May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV. As with all ETFs, fund shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of the shares of the fund will approximate the funds NAV, there may be times when the market price and the NAV vary significantly. Thus, you may pay more than NAV when you buy shares of the fund in the secondary market, and you may receive less than NAV when you sell those shares in the secondary market.
The market price of fund shares during the trading day, like the price of any exchange-traded security, includes a bid/ask spread charged by the exchange specialist, market makers or other participants that trade the fund shares. The bid/ask spread on ETF shares varies over time and is generally larger when the ETFs shares have little trading volume or market liquidity. In addition, in times of severe market disruption, the bid/ask spread can increase significantly. At those times, fund shares are most likely to be traded at a discount to NAV, and the discount is likely to be greatest when the price of shares is falling fastest, which may be the time that you most want to sell your shares. The Adviser believes that, under normal market conditions, large market price discounts or premiums to NAV will not be sustained because of arbitrage opportunities.
Lack of Governmental Insurance or Guarantee. An investment in the fund is not a bank deposit and it is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Investment objective
The Funds goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Small Company Index. The funds investment objective is not fundamental and therefore may be changed by the funds board of trustees without shareholder approval.
Index
The Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Small Company Index (the Index) selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The
Fund details | 27 |
Index measures the performance of the small company size segment by fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies included in the Russell Developed ex-U.S. Index (the Russell Index). Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Index. Companies with weights below the 87.5% mark make up the Index. The weights of the companies included in the Index are determined annually and are implemented using a partial quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. As of July 31, 2013, the Index consisted of 1,247 constituent companies which had an average market capitalization of $1.72 billion (the market capitalization of the constituent companies ranged from $85.01 million to $18.53 billion.) The Index is compiled and calculated by Russell Investments in conjunction with Research Affiliates LLC, and the method of calculating the components of the Index is subject to change.
More about the funds principal investment risks
The fund is subject to risks, any of which could cause an investor to lose money.
Market Risk. Stock markets rise and fall daily. As with any investment whose performance is tied to these markets, the value of your investment in the fund will fluctuate, which means that you could lose money.
Investment Style Risk. The fund is not actively managed. Therefore, the fund follows the stocks included in the index during upturns as well as downturns. Because of its indexing strategy, the fund does not take steps to reduce market exposure or to lessen the effects of a declining market. In addition, because of the funds expenses, the funds performance may be below that of the index.
Equity Risk. The prices of equity securities rise and fall daily. These price movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, industries or the securities market as a whole. Individual companies may report poor results or be negatively affected by industry and/or economic trends and developments. The prices of securities issued by such companies may suffer a decline in response. In addition, the equity market tends to move in cycles which may cause stock prices to fall over short or extended periods of time.
Small-Cap Risk. Historically, small-cap stocks have been riskier than large-cap stocks. Stock prices of smaller companies may be based in substantial part on future expectations rather than current achievements and may move sharply, especially during market upturns and downturns. Small-cap companies themselves may be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic events than larger, more established companies. During a period when small-cap stocks fall behind other types of investments bonds or large-cap stocks, for instance the funds performance also will lag those investments.
Foreign Investment Risk. The funds investments in securities of foreign issuers involve certain risks that are greater than those associated with investments in securities of U.S. issuers. These include risks of adverse changes in foreign economic, political, regulatory and other conditions, or changes in currency exchange rates or exchange control regulations (including limitations on currency movements and exchanges). In certain countries, legal remedies available to investors may be more limited than those available with respect to investments in the United States. The securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and, at times, more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. The fund may also experience more rapid or extreme changes in value as compared to a fund that invests solely in securities of U.S. companies because the securities markets of many foreign countries are relatively small, with a limited number of companies representing a small number of industries. There also is the risk that the cost of buying, selling, and holding foreign securities, including brokerage, tax, and custody costs, may be higher than those involved in domestic transactions. These risks may be heightened in connection with investments in emerging markets.
Geographic Risk. To the extent the funds investments in a single country or a limited number of countries represent a higher percentage of the funds assets, the fund assumes the risk that economic, political and social conditions in those countries will have a significant impact on its investment performance and it may be subject to increased price volatility.
Depositary Receipt Risk. Foreign securities also include ADRs, which are U.S. dollar-denominated receipts representing shares of foreign based corporations. ADRs are issued by U.S. banks or trust companies, and entitle the holder to all dividends and capital gains that are paid out on the underlying foreign shares. Foreign securities also include GDRs, which are similar to ADRs, but are shares of foreign-based corporations generally issued by international banks in one or more markets around the world. In addition, foreign securities includes EDRs, similar to GDRs, are shares of foreign-based corporations generally issued by European banks that trade on exchanges outside of the banks home country. Investment in ADRs, GDRs and EDRs may be less liquid than the underlying shares in their primary trading market and GDRs, many of which are issued by companies in emerging markets, may be more volatile.
Currency Risk. As a result of its investments in securities denominated in, and/or receiving revenues in, foreign currencies, the fund will be subject to currency risk. This is the risk that those currencies will decline in value relative to the U.S. Dollar. In either event, the dollar value of an investment in the fund would be adversely affected. Currency exchange rates may fluctuate in response to factors extrinsic to that countrys economy, which makes the forecasting of currency market movements extremely difficult. Currency rates in foreign countries may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time for a number of reasons, including changes in interest rates, intervention (or failure to intervene) by U.S. or foreign governments, central banks or supranational entities such as the International Monetary Fund, or by the
28 | Fund details |
imposition of currency controls or other political developments in the United States or abroad. These can result in losses to the fund if it is unable to deliver or receive currency or funds in settlement of obligations. Forward contracts on foreign currencies are not traded on exchanges; rather, a bank or dealer will act as agent or as principal to make or take future delivery of a specified lot of a particular currency for the funds account. The fund is subject to the risk of a principals failure, inability or refusal to perform with respect to such contracts.
Sampling Index Tracking Risk. The fund may not fully replicate the index and may hold securities not included in the index. As a result, the fund is subject to the risk that the Advisers investment management strategy, the implementation of which is subject to a number of constraints, may not produce the intended results. Because the fund utilizes a sampling approach it may not track the return of the index as well as it would if the fund purchased all of the equity securities in the index.
Tracking Error Risk. As an index fund, the fund seeks to track the performance of its benchmark index, although it may not be successful in doing so. The divergence between the performance of the fund and its benchmark index, positive or negative, is called tracking error. Tracking error can be caused by many factors and it may be significant. For example, the fund may not invest in certain securities in its benchmark index, match the securities weighting to the benchmark, or the fund may invest in securities not in the index, due to regulatory, operational, custodial or liquidity constraints; corporate transactions; asset valuations; transaction costs and timing; tax considerations; and index rebalancing, which may result in tracking error. The fund may attempt to offset the effects of not being invested in certain index securities by making substitute investments, but these efforts may not be successful. In addition, cash flows into and out of the fund, operating expenses and trading costs all affect the ability of the fund to match the performance of its benchmark index, because the benchmark index does not have to manage cash flows and does not incur any costs.
Derivatives Risk. The fund may invest in derivative instruments. The principal types of derivatives the fund may use are futures contracts. A futures contract is an agreement to buy or sell a financial instrument at a specific price on a specific day. The funds use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Certain of these risks, such as leverage risk, market risk and liquidity risk, are discussed elsewhere in this section. The funds use of derivatives is also subject to credit risk, lack of availability risk, valuation risk, correlation risk and tax risk. Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty to a derivative transaction may not fulfill its contractual obligations. Lack of availability risk is the risk that suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances for risk management or other purposes. Valuation risk is the risk that a particular derivative may be valued incorrectly. Correlation risk is the risk that changes in the value of the derivative may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate or index. Tax risk is the risk that the use of derivatives may cause the fund to realize higher amounts of short-term capital gain. These risks could cause the fund to lose more than the principal amount invested.
Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk exists when particular investments are difficult to purchase or sell. The market for certain investments may become illiquid due to specific adverse changes in the conditions of a particular issuer or under adverse market or economic conditions independent of the issuer. The funds investments in illiquid securities may reduce the returns of the fund because it may be unable to sell a security at an advantageous time or price. Further, transactions in illiquid securities may entail transaction costs that are higher than those for transactions in liquid securities.
Leverage Risk. Certain fund transactions, such as derivatives, may give rise to a form of leverage and may expose the fund to greater risk. Leverage tends to magnify the effect of any decrease or increase in the value of the funds portfolio securities. The use of leverage may cause the fund to liquidate portfolio positions when it would not be advantageous to do so in order to satisfy its obligations.
Securities Lending Risk. The fund may lend its portfolio securities to brokers, dealers, and other financial institutions provided a number of conditions are satisfied, including that the loan is fully collateralized. When the fund lends portfolio securities, its investment performance will continue to reflect changes in the value of the securities loaned, and the fund will also receive a fee or interest on the collateral. Securities lending involves the risk of loss of rights in the collateral or delay in recovery of the collateral if the borrower fails to return the security loaned or becomes insolvent. The fund will also bear the risk of any decline in value of securities acquired with cash collateral. The fund may pay lending fees to a party arranging the loan.
Concentration Risk. To the extent that the funds or the indexs portfolio is concentrated in the securities of issuers in a particular market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class, the fund may be adversely affected by the performance of those securities, may be subject to increased price volatility and may be more susceptible to adverse economic, market, political or regulatory occurrences affecting that market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class.
Market Trading Risk. Although fund shares are listed on national securities exchanges, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for fund shares will develop or be maintained. If an active market is not maintained, investors may find it difficult to buy or sell fund shares. Trading of shares of the fund on a stock exchange may be halted if exchange officials deem such action appropriate, if the fund is delisted, or if the activation of marketwide circuit breakers halts stock trading generally. If the funds shares are delisted, the fund may seek to list its shares on another market, merge with another ETF, or redeem its shares at NAV.
Shares of the Fund May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV. As with all ETFs, fund shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of the shares of the fund will approximate the funds NAV, there may be times
Fund details | 29 |
when the market price and the NAV vary significantly. Thus, you may pay more than NAV when you buy shares of the fund in the secondary market, and you may receive less than NAV when you sell those shares in the secondary market.
The market price of fund shares during the trading day, like the price of any exchange-traded security, includes a bid/ask spread charged by the exchange specialist, market makers or other participants that trade the fund shares. The bid/ask spread on ETF shares varies over time and is generally larger when the ETFs shares have little trading volume or market liquidity. In addition, in times of severe market disruption, the bid/ask spread can increase significantly. At those times, fund shares are most likely to be traded at a discount to NAV, and the discount is likely to be greatest when the price of shares is falling fastest, which may be the time that you most want to sell your shares. The Adviser believes that, under normal market conditions, large market price discounts or premiums to NAV will not be sustained because of arbitrage opportunities.
Lack of Governmental Insurance or Guarantee. An investment in the fund is not a bank deposit and it is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
Investment objective
The Funds goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index. The funds investment objective is not fundamental and therefore may be changed by the funds board of trustees without shareholder approval.
Index
The Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index (the Index) selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The Index measures the performance of the large company size segment by fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies included in the Russell Emerging Markets Index (the Russell Index). Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Index. Companies with weights above 87.5% make up the Index. The weights of the companies included in the Index are determined annually and are implemented using a partial quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. As of July 31, 2013, the Index consisted of 277 constituent companies which had an average market capitalization of $9.08 billion (the market capitalization of the constituent companies ranged from $269.57 million to $127.99 billion.) The Index is compiled and calculated by Russell Investments in conjunction with Research Affiliates LLC, and the method of calculating the components of the Index is subject to change.
More about the funds principal investment risks
The fund is subject to risks, any of which could cause an investor to lose money.
Market Risk. Stock markets rise and fall daily. As with any investment whose performance is tied to these markets, the value of your investment in the fund will fluctuate, which means that you could lose money.
Investment Style Risk. The fund is not actively managed. Therefore, the fund follows the stocks included in the index during upturns as well as downturns. Because of its indexing strategy, the fund does not take steps to reduce market exposure or to lessen the effects of a declining market. In addition, because of the funds expenses, the funds performance may be below that of the index.
Equity Risk. The prices of equity securities rise and fall daily. These price movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, industries or the securities market as a whole. Individual companies may report poor results or be negatively affected by industry and/or economic trends and developments. The prices of securities issued by such companies may suffer a decline in response. In addition, the equity market tends to move in cycles which may cause stock prices to fall over short or extended periods of time.
Large-Cap Risk. Large-cap stocks tend to go in and out of favor based on market and economic conditions. During a period when large-cap U.S. stocks fall behind other types of investments small-cap stocks, for instance the funds large-cap holdings could reduce performance.
Foreign Investment Risk. The funds investments in securities of foreign issuers involve certain risks that are greater than those associated with investments in securities of U.S. issuers. These include risks of adverse changes in foreign economic, political, regulatory and other conditions, or changes in currency exchange rates or exchange control regulations (including limitations on currency movements and exchanges). In certain countries, legal remedies available to investors may be more limited than those available with respect to investments in the United States. The securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and, at times, more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. The fund may also experience more rapid or extreme changes in value as compared to a fund that invests solely in securities of U.S. companies because the securities markets of many foreign countries are relatively small, with a limited number of companies
30 | Fund details |
representing a small number of industries. There also is the risk that the cost of buying, selling, and holding foreign securities, including brokerage, tax, and custody costs, may be higher than those involved in domestic transactions. These risks may be heightened in connection with investments in emerging markets.
Geographic Risk. To the extent the funds investments in a single country or a limited number of countries represent a higher percentage of the funds assets, the fund assumes the risk that economic, political and social conditions in those countries will have a significant impact on its investment performance and it may be subject to increased price volatility.
Depositary Receipt Risk. Foreign securities also include ADRs, which are U.S. dollar-denominated receipts representing shares of foreign based corporations. ADRs are issued by U.S. banks or trust companies, and entitle the holder to all dividends and capital gains that are paid out on the underlying foreign shares. Foreign securities also include GDRs, which are similar to ADRs, but are shares of foreign-based corporations generally issued by international banks in one or more markets around the world. In addition, foreign securities includes EDRs, similar to GDRs, are shares of foreign-based corporations generally issued by European banks that trade on exchanges outside of the banks home country. Investment in ADRs, GDRs and EDRs may be less liquid than the underlying shares in their primary trading market and GDRs, many of which are issued by companies in emerging markets, may be more volatile.
Emerging Markets Risk. Emerging market countries may be more likely to experience political turmoil or rapid changes in market or economic conditions than more developed countries. Emerging market countries often have less uniformity in accounting and reporting requirements and greater risk associated with the custody of securities. It is sometimes difficult to obtain and enforce court judgments in such countries and there is often a greater potential for nationalization and/or expropriation of assets by the government of an emerging market country. In addition, the financial stability of issuers (including governments) in emerging market countries may be more precarious than in other countries. As a result, there will tend to be an increased risk of price volatility associated with the funds investments in emerging market countries, which may be magnified by currency fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar, and, at times, it may be difficult to value such investments.
Currency Risk. As a result of its investments in securities denominated in, and/or receiving revenues in, foreign currencies, the fund will be subject to currency risk. This is the risk that those currencies will decline in value relative to the U.S. Dollar. In either event, the dollar value of an investment in the fund would be adversely affected. Currency exchange rates may fluctuate in response to factors extrinsic to that countrys economy, which makes the forecasting of currency market movements extremely difficult. Currency rates in foreign countries may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time for a number of reasons, including changes in interest rates, intervention (or failure to intervene) by U.S. or foreign governments, central banks or supranational entities such as the International Monetary Fund, or by the imposition of currency controls or other political developments in the United States or abroad. These can result in losses to the fund if it is unable to deliver or receive currency or funds in settlement of obligations. Forward contracts on foreign currencies are not traded on exchanges; rather, a bank or dealer will act as agent or as principal to make or take future delivery of a specified lot of a particular currency for the funds account. The fund is subject to the risk of a principals failure, inability or refusal to perform with respect to such contracts.
Sampling Index Tracking Risk. The fund may not fully replicate the index and may hold securities not included in the index. As a result, the fund is subject to the risk that the Advisers investment management strategy, the implementation of which is subject to a number of constraints, may not produce the intended results. Because the fund utilizes a sampling approach it may not track the return of the index as well as it would if the fund purchased all of the equity securities in the index.
Tracking Error Risk. As an index fund, the fund seeks to track the performance of its benchmark index, although it may not be successful in doing so. The divergence between the performance of the fund and its benchmark index, positive or negative, is called tracking error. Tracking error can be caused by many factors and it may be significant. For example, the fund may not invest in certain securities in its benchmark index, match the securities weighting to the benchmark, or the fund may invest in securities not in the index, due to regulatory, operational, custodial or liquidity constraints; corporate transactions; asset valuations; transaction costs and timing; tax considerations; and index rebalancing, which may result in tracking error. The fund may attempt to offset the effects of not being invested in certain index securities by making substitute investments, but these efforts may not be successful. In addition, cash flows into and out of the fund, operating expenses and trading costs all affect the ability of the fund to match the performance of its benchmark index, because the benchmark index does not have to manage cash flows and does not incur any costs.
Derivatives Risk. The fund may invest in derivative instruments. The principal types of derivatives the fund may use are futures contracts. A futures contract is an agreement to buy or sell a financial instrument at a specific price on a specific day. The funds use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Certain of these risks, such as leverage risk, market risk and liquidity risk, are discussed elsewhere in this section. The funds use of derivatives is also subject to credit risk, lack of availability risk, valuation risk, correlation risk and tax risk. Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty to a derivative transaction may not fulfill its contractual obligations. Lack of availability risk is the risk that suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances for risk management or other purposes. Valuation risk is the risk that a particular derivative may be valued incorrectly. Correlation risk is the risk that changes in the value of the derivative may not correlate
Fund details | 31 |
perfectly with the underlying asset, rate or index. Tax risk is the risk that the use of derivatives may cause the fund to realize higher amounts of short-term capital gain. These risks could cause the fund to lose more than the principal amount invested.
Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk exists when particular investments are difficult to purchase or sell. The market for certain investments may become illiquid due to specific adverse changes in the conditions of a particular issuer or under adverse market or economic conditions independent of the issuer. The funds investments in illiquid securities may reduce the returns of the fund because it may be unable to sell a security at an advantageous time or price. Further, transactions in illiquid securities may entail transaction costs that are higher than those for transactions in liquid securities.
Leverage Risk. Certain fund transactions, such as derivatives, may give rise to a form of leverage and may expose the fund to greater risk. Leverage tends to magnify the effect of any decrease or increase in the value of the funds portfolio securities. The use of leverage may cause the fund to liquidate portfolio positions when it would not be advantageous to do so in order to satisfy its obligations.
Securities Lending Risk. The fund may lend its portfolio securities to brokers, dealers, and other financial institutions provided a number of conditions are satisfied, including that the loan is fully collateralized. When the fund lends portfolio securities, its investment performance will continue to reflect changes in the value of the securities loaned, and the fund will also receive a fee or interest on the collateral. Securities lending involves the risk of loss of rights in the collateral or delay in recovery of the collateral if the borrower fails to return the security loaned or becomes insolvent. The fund will also bear the risk of any decline in value of securities acquired with cash collateral. The fund may pay lending fees to a party arranging the loan.
Concentration Risk. To the extent that the funds or the indexs portfolio is concentrated in the securities of issuers in a particular market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class, the fund may be adversely affected by the performance of those securities, may be subject to increased price volatility and may be more susceptible to adverse economic, market, political or regulatory occurrences affecting that market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class.
Market Trading Risk. Although fund shares are listed on national securities exchanges, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for fund shares will develop or be maintained. If an active market is not maintained, investors may find it difficult to buy or sell fund shares. Trading of shares of the fund on a stock exchange may be halted if exchange officials deem such action appropriate, if the fund is delisted, or if the activation of marketwide circuit breakers halts stock trading generally. If the funds shares are delisted, the fund may seek to list its shares on another market, merge with another ETF, or redeem its shares at NAV.
Shares of the Fund May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV. As with all ETFs, fund shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of the shares of the fund will approximate the funds NAV, there may be times when the market price and the NAV vary significantly. Thus, you may pay more than NAV when you buy shares of the fund in the secondary market, and you may receive less than NAV when you sell those shares in the secondary market.
The market price of fund shares during the trading day, like the price of any exchange-traded security, includes a bid/ask spread charged by the exchange specialist, market makers or other participants that trade the fund shares. The bid/ask spread on ETF shares varies over time and is generally larger when the ETFs shares have little trading volume or market liquidity. In addition, in times of severe market disruption, the bid/ask spread can increase significantly. At those times, fund shares are most likely to be traded at a discount to NAV, and the discount is likely to be greatest when the price of shares is falling fastest, which may be the time that you most want to sell your shares. The Adviser believes that, under normal market conditions, large market price discounts or premiums to NAV will not be sustained because of arbitrage opportunities.
Lack of Governmental Insurance or Guarantee. An investment in the fund is not a bank deposit and it is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
A description of the funds policies and procedures with respect to the disclosure of a funds portfolio securities is available in the Statement of Additional Information (SAI).
32 | Fund details |
The funds are newly organized and therefore they have not yet had any operations as of the date of this prospectus.
Financial highlights | 33 |
The investment adviser for the Schwab Fundamental Index ETFs is Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. (CSIM), 211 Main Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. CSIM was founded in 1989 and as of July 31, 2013, managed approximately $234 billion in assets.
As the investment adviser, the firm oversees the asset management and administration of the funds. As compensation for these services, the firm receives a management fee from the funds, expressed as a percentage of each funds average daily net assets.
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF |
0.32% | |||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF |
0.32% | |||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF |
0.32% | |||
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF |
0.32% | |||
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF |
0.46% | |||
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF |
0.46% |
A discussion regarding the basis for the Board of Trustees approval of the funds investment advisory agreements will be included in the funds annual and/or semi-annual report to shareholders, following such approval.
Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement between the Adviser and each fund, the Adviser will pay the operating expenses of the fund, excluding interest expense, taxes, any brokerage expenses, and extraordinary or non-routine expenses.
Agnes Hong, CFA, Managing Director and Head of Passive Equity Strategies, leads the portfolio management team of Schwabs index mutual funds and equity ETFs. She also has overall responsibility for all aspects of the management of the funds. Prior to joining CSIM in 2009, Ms. Hong spent five years as a portfolio manager at Barclays Global Investors (subsequently acquired by BlackRock), where she managed institutional index funds and quantitative active funds. Prior to that, Ms. Hong worked in management consulting and product management, servicing global financial services clients.
Chuck Craig, CFA, Managing Director and Senior Portfolio Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the funds. Prior to joining CSIM in 2012, Mr. Craig worked at Guggenheim Funds (formerly Claymore Group), where he spent over five years as a managing director of portfolio management & supervision, and three years as vice president of product research and development. Prior to that, he worked as an equity research analyst at First Trust Portfolios (formerly Niké Securities), and a trader and analyst at PMA Securities, Inc.
Jane Qin , Portfolio Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day co-management of the funds. Prior to joining CSIM in 2013, Ms. Qin worked at The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, where she spent more than two years as an associate equity portfolio manager, and nearly two years as a performance analyst. Prior to that, Ms. Qin worked at Wells Fargo Fund Management as a mutual fund analyst and at CIGNA Reinsurance in the Variable Annuity Death Benefits (VADBe) Risk Management group as a risk analyst.
Additional information about the portfolio managers compensation, other accounts managed by the portfolio managers and the portfolio managers ownership of securities in the funds is available in the SAI.
Distributor. The funds Distributor is SEI Investments Distribution Co. The Distributor, located at 1 Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456, is a broker-dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Distributor distributes Creation Units for the funds and does not maintain a secondary market in shares of the funds.
34 | Fund management |
On the following pages, you will find information on buying and selling shares. Most investors will invest in the funds through an intermediary by placing orders through their brokerage account at Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (Schwab) or an account with another broker/dealer or other intermediary. Authorized Participants (as defined in Purchase and redemption of creation units, below) may invest directly in the funds by placing orders for Creation Units through the funds Distributor (direct orders). Helpful information on taxes is included as well.
Shares of the funds trade on national securities exchanges and elsewhere during the trading day and can be bought and sold throughout the trading day like other shares of publicly traded securities. When buying or selling shares through a broker most investors will incur customary brokerage commissions and charges. In addition, you may incur the cost of the spread that is, any difference between the bid price and the ask price.
Shares of the funds trade under the following trading symbols:
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF |
FNDB | |||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF |
FNDX | |||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF |
FNDA | |||
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF |
FNDF | |||
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF |
FNDC | |||
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF |
FNDE |
Shares of the funds may be acquired or redeemed directly from the funds only in Creation Units or multiples thereof, as discussed in the Creation and Redemption section below. Once created, shares of the funds trade in the secondary market in amounts less than a Creation Unit. The funds do not impose any minimum investment for shares of the funds purchased on an exchange or in the secondary market. Except when aggregated in Creation Units, shares are not redeemable by the funds.
As with other types of securities, the trading prices of shares in the secondary market can be affected by market forces such as supply and demand, economic conditions and other factors. The price you pay or receive when you buy or sell your shares in the secondary market may be more (a premium) or less (a discount) than the NAV of such shares.
The approximate value of shares of the funds are disseminated every fifteen seconds throughout the trading day by the national securities exchange on which the funds are listed or by other information providers. This approximate value should not be viewed as a real-time update of the NAV, because the approximate value may not be calculated in the same manner as the NAV, which is computed once per day. The approximate value generally is determined by using current market quotations and/or price quotations obtained from broker-dealers that may trade in the portfolio securities held by the funds. The funds and Adviser are not involved in, or responsible for, the calculation or dissemination of the approximate value and make no warranty as to its accuracy.
Determination of net asset value
The NAV of the funds shares are calculated as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time, on each day the NYSE is open for trading (each, a Business Day). NAV per share is calculated by dividing the funds net assets by the number of the funds shares outstanding.
In valuing their securities, the funds use market quotes or official closing prices if they are readily available. In cases where quotes are not readily available, the funds may value securities based on fair values developed using methods approved by the funds Board of Trustees (described below).
The funds Board of Trustees has adopted procedures, which include fair value methodologies, to fair value the funds securities when market prices are not readily available or are unreliable. For example, the funds may fair value a security when a security is de-listed or its trading is halted or suspended; when a securitys primary pricing source is unable or unwilling to provide a price; when a securitys primary trading market is closed during regular market hours; or when a securitys value is materially affected by events occurring after the close of the securitys primary trading market. By fair valuing securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of
Investing in the funds | 35 |
trading, the funds seek to establish prices that investors might expect to realize upon the current sales of these securities. The funds fair value methodologies seek to ensure that the prices at which the funds shares are purchased and redeemed are fair and do not result in dilution of shareholder interest or other harm to shareholders. Generally, when fair valuing a security, the funds will take into account all reasonably available information that may be relevant to a particular valuation including, but not limited to, fundamental analytical data regarding the issuer, information relating to the issuers business, recent trades or offers of the security, general and specific market conditions and the specific facts giving rise to the need to fair value the security. The funds make fair value determinations in good faith and in accordance with the fair value methodologies included in the Board adopted valuation procedures. Due to the subjective and variable nature of fair value pricing, there can be no assurance that the funds could obtain the fair value assigned to the security upon the sale of such security.
Shareholders of the funds should be aware that because foreign markets are often open on weekends and other days when the funds are closed, the value of the funds portfolios may change on days when it is not possible to buy or sell shares of the funds.
Transactions in fund shares will be priced at NAV only if you purchase or redeem shares directly from the funds in Creation Units. Fund shares that are purchased or sold on a national securities exchange will be effected at prevailing market prices, which may be higher or lower than NAV, and may be subject to brokerage commissions and charges. As described below, purchases and redemptions of Creation Units will be priced at the NAV next determined after receipt of the purchase or redemption order.
Purchase and redemption of creation units
Creation and redemption
The shares that trade in the secondary market are created at NAV. The funds issue and redeem shares only in Creation Units, which are large blocks of shares, typically 50,000 shares or more depending on the fund. Only institutional investors, who have entered into an authorized participant agreement (known as Authorized Participants), may purchase or redeem Creation Units. Creation Units generally are issued and redeemed in exchange for a specified basket of securities approximating the holdings of the funds and/or a designated amount of cash. Each Business Day, prior to the opening of trading, the funds publish the specific securities and designated amount of cash included in that days basket for the funds through the National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC) or other method of public dissemination. The funds reserve the right to accept or pay out a basket of securities or cash that differs from the published basket. The prices at which creations and redemptions occur are based on the next calculation of NAV after an order is received and deemed acceptable by the Distributor. Orders from Authorized Participants to create or redeem Creation Units will only be accepted on a Business Day and are also subject to acceptance by the funds and the Distributor.
Creations and redemptions must be made by an Authorized Participant or through a firm that is either a member of the Continuous Net Settlement System of the NSCC or a Depository Trust Company participant, and in each case, must have executed an agreement with the Distributor with respect to creations and redemptions of Creation Unit aggregations. Information about the procedures regarding creation and redemption of Creation Units is included in the funds SAI.
Authorized participants and the continuous offering of shares
Because new shares may be created and issued on an ongoing basis, at any point during the life of the funds, a distribution, as such term is used in the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), may be occurring. Broker-dealers and other persons are cautioned that some activities on their part may, depending on the circumstances, result in them being deemed participants in a distribution in a manner that could render them statutory underwriters and subject to the prospectus-delivery and liability provisions of the Securities Act. Nonetheless, any determination of whether one is an underwriter must take into account all the relevant facts and circumstances of each particular case.
Broker-dealers should also note that dealers who are not underwriters, but are participating in a distribution (as contrasted to ordinary secondary transactions), and thus dealing with shares that are part of an unsold allotment within the meaning of Section 4(3)(C) of the Securities Act, would be unable to take advantage of the prospectus delivery exemption provided by Section 4(3) of the Securities Act. For delivery of prospectuses to exchange members, the prospectus delivery mechanism of Rule 153 under the Securities Act is only available with respect to transactions on a national securities exchange.
Creation and redemption transaction fees for creation units
The funds may impose a creation transaction fee and a redemption transaction fee to offset transfer and other transaction costs associated with the issuance and redemption of Creation Units of shares. The creation and redemption transaction fees applicable to the funds are listed below. The standard creation transaction fee is charged to each purchaser on the day such purchaser creates a Creation Unit. The standard fee is a single charge and will be the amount indicated below regardless of the number of Creation Units purchased by an investor on the same day. Similarly, the standard redemption transaction fee will be the amount indicated regardless of the number of Creation Units redeemed that day. Purchasers and redeemers of Creation Units for cash will be subject to an additional variable charge up to the maximum amount shown in the table below. This additional variable charge will offset the transaction costs to the funds of buying or selling
36 | Investing in the funds |
portfolio securities. In addition, purchasers and redeemers of shares in Creation Units are responsible for payment of the costs of transferring securities to or out of the funds. From time to time, the Adviser may cover the cost of any transaction fees when believed to be in the best interests of the funds.
The following table shows, as of August 8, 2013, the approximate value of one Creation Unit of the funds, including the standard and maximum additional creation and redemption transaction fee. These fees are payable only by investors who purchase shares directly from the funds. Retail investors who purchase shares through their brokerage account will not pay these fees. Investors who use the services of a broker or other such intermediary may pay fees for such services.
Name of Fund |
Approximate Value
of One Creation Unit |
Standard
Creation/Redemption Transaction Fee |
Maximum
Additional Creation Transaction Fee* |
Maximum
Additional Redemption Transaction Fee* |
||||||||||||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF |
$ | 1,250,000 | $ | 1,000 | 3.0% | 2.0% | ||||||||||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF |
$ | 1,250,000 | $ | 500 | 3.0% | 2.0% | ||||||||||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF |
$ | 1,250,000 | $ | 500 | 3.0% | 2.0% | ||||||||||
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF |
$ | 2,500,000 | $ | 12,500 | 3.0% | 2.0% | ||||||||||
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF |
$ | 2,500,000 | $ | 12,500 | 3.0% | 2.0% | ||||||||||
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF |
$ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,000 | 3.0% | 2.0% |
* | As a percentage of total amount invested or redeemed. |
Policy regarding short-term or excessive trading. The funds have adopted policies and procedures with respect to frequent purchases and redemptions of Creation Units of fund shares. However, because the funds are ETFs, only Authorized Participants are authorized to purchase and redeem shares directly with the funds. Because purchase and redemption transactions with Authorized Participants are an essential part of the ETF process and help keep ETF trading prices in line with NAV, the funds accommodate frequent purchases and redemptions by Authorized Participants. Frequent purchases and redemptions for cash may increase index tracking error and portfolio transaction costs and may lead to realization of capital gains. Frequent in-kind creations and redemptions do not give rise to these concerns. The funds reserve the right to reject any purchase order at any time.
The funds reserve the right to impose restrictions on disruptive, excessive, or short-term trading. Such trading is defined by the funds as purchases and sales of fund shares in amounts and frequency determined by the funds to be significant and in a pattern of activity that can potentially be detrimental to the funds and their shareholders, such as by diluting the value of the shareholders holdings, increasing fund transaction costs, disrupting portfolio management strategy, incurring unwanted taxable gains, or forcing funds to hold excess levels of cash. The funds may reject purchase or redemption orders in such instances. The funds also imposes a transaction fee on Creation Unit transactions that is designed to offset the funds transfer and other transaction costs associated with the issuance and redemption of the Creation Units. Although the funds have adopted policies and procedures designed to discourage disruptive, excessive or short-term trading, there can be no guarantee that the funds will be able to identify and restrict investors that engage in such activities or eliminate the risks associated with such activities. In addition, the decisions to restrict trading are inherently subjective and involve judgment in their application. The funds may amend these policies and procedures in response to changing regulatory requirements or to enhance their effectiveness.
Investments by Registered Investment Companies. Section 12(d)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 restricts investments by registered investment companies in the securities of other investment companies, including shares of the funds. Registered investment companies are permitted to invest in the funds beyond the limits set forth in section 12(d)(1), subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in an SEC exemptive order issued to the Schwab Strategic Trust, including that such investment companies enter into an agreement with the funds.
Investing in the funds | 37 |
Any investment in the funds typically involves several tax considerations. The information below is meant as a general summary for U.S. citizens and residents. Please see the SAI for additional information. Because each persons tax situation is different, you should consult your tax advisor about the tax implications of your investment in a fund. You also can visit the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) web site at www.irs.gov.
As a shareholder, you are entitled to your share of the dividends and gains your fund earns. Dividends from net investment income, if any, are generally declared and paid quarterly by Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF, Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF, and annually by Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF, Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF. Distributions of net realized capital gains, if any, generally are declared and paid once a year, although the funds may do so more frequently as determined by the Board of Trustees. Each fund reserves the right to declare special distributions if, in its reasonable discretion, such action is necessary or advisable to preserve its status as a regulated investment company or to avoid imposition of income or excise taxes on undistributed income or realized gains. Dividends and other distributions on shares of the funds are distributed on a pro rata basis to beneficial owners of such shares. During the fourth quarter of the year, typically in early November, an estimate of the funds year-end distribution, if any, may be made available on the funds website www.schwabetfs.com/prospectus.
Unless you are investing through an IRA, 401(k) or other tax-advantaged retirement account, your fund distributions generally have tax consequences . Each funds net investment income and short-term capital gains are distributed as dividends and will be taxable as ordinary income or qualified dividend income. Other capital gain distributions are taxable as long-term capital gains, regardless of how long you have held your shares in the fund. Distributions generally are taxable in the tax year in which they are declared, whether you reinvest them or take them in cash.
Generally, any sale of your shares is a taxable event. A sale of your shares may give rise to a gain or loss. In general, any gain or loss realized upon a taxable disposition of shares will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the shares have been held for more than one year. Otherwise, the gain or loss on the taxable disposition of shares will be treated as short-term capital gain or loss. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, the maximum individual rate applicable to long-term capital gains depends on whether the individuals income exceeds certain threshold amounts. The maximum rate is generally 15% for taxpayers whose income is equal to or less than $400,000 (individual filers) or $450,000 (married filing jointly), and 20% for taxpayers whose income exceeds the foregoing thresholds. Any loss realized upon a taxable disposition of shares held for six months or less will be treated as long-term, rather than short-term, to the extent of any long-term capital gain distributions received (or deemed received) by you with respect to the shares. All or a portion of any loss realized upon a taxable disposition of shares will be disallowed if you purchase other substantially identical shares within 30 days before or after the disposition. In such a case, the basis of the newly purchased shares will be adjusted to reflect the disallowed loss.
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, an additional 3.8% Medicare tax will be imposed on certain net investment income (including ordinary dividends and capital gain distributions received from a fund and net gains from redemptions or other taxable dispositions of fund shares) of U.S. individuals, estates and trusts to the extent that such persons modified adjusted gross income (in the case of an individual) or adjusted gross income (in the case of an estate or trust) exceeds certain threshold amounts.
At the beginning of every year, the funds provide shareholders with information detailing the tax status of any distributions the funds paid during the previous calendar year. Schwab customers also receive information on distributions and transactions in their monthly account statements.
More on qualified dividend income and distributions. Dividends that are reported by the funds as qualified dividend income are eligible for reduced rates for individual shareholders. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, the maximum individual rate applicable to qualified dividend income depends on whether the individuals income exceeds certain threshold amounts. The maximum rate is generally 15% for taxpayers whose income is equal to or less than $400,000 (individual filers) or $450,000 (married filing jointly), and 20% for taxpayers whose income exceeds the foregoing thresholds. Qualified dividend income is, in general, dividend income from taxable domestic corporations and certain foreign corporations. The funds expect that a portion of the funds ordinary income distributions will be eligible to be treated as qualified dividend income subject to the reduced tax rates.
If you are investing through a taxable account and purchase shares of a fund just before it declares a distribution, you may receive a portion of your investment back as a taxable distribution. This is because when a fund makes a distribution, the share price is reduced by the amount of the distribution.
You can avoid buying a dividend, as it is often called, by finding out if a distribution is imminent and waiting until afterwards to invest. Of course, you may decide that the opportunity to gain a few days of investment performance outweighs the tax consequences of buying a dividend.
38 | Investing in the funds |
Taxes on creation and redemption of creation units
An Authorized Participant who exchanges securities for Creation Units generally will recognize a gain or a loss equal to the difference between the market value of the Creation Units at the time of the exchange and the sum of the exchangers aggregate basis in the securities surrendered and the cash component paid. A person who redeems Creation Units will generally recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference between the exchangers basis in the Creation Units and the sum of the aggregate market value of the securities and the amount of cash received for such Creation Units. The Internal Revenue Service, however, may assert that a loss realized upon an exchange of securities for Creation Units cannot be deducted currently under the rules governing wash sales, or on the basis that there has been no significant change in economic position. Persons exchanging securities for Creation Units should consult a tax advisor with respect to whether wash sale rules apply and when a loss might be deductible. Any capital gain or loss realized upon a redemption (or creation) of Creation Units is generally treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the funds shares (or securities surrendered) have been held for more than one year and as short-term capital gain or loss if the shares (or securities surrendered) have been held for one year or less.
If you purchase or redeem Creation Units, you will be sent a confirmation statement showing how many shares you purchased or sold and at what price. Persons purchasing or redeeming Creation Units should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the tax treatment of any creation or redemption transaction.
Investing in the funds | 39 |
Notes
Notes
To learn more
This prospectus contains important information on the funds and should be read and kept for reference. You also can obtain more information from the following sources.
Annual and semi-annual reports, which are mailed to current fund investors, contain more information about the funds holdings and detailed financial information about the funds. Annual reports also contain information from the funds managers about strategies, recent market conditions and trends and their impact on fund performance.
The SAI includes a more detailed discussion of investment policies and the risks associated with various investments. The SAI is incorporated by reference into the prospectus, making it legally part of the prospectus.
For a free copy of any of these documents or to request other information or ask questions about the funds, call Schwab ETFs at 1-800-435-4000. In addition, you may visit Schwab ETFs web site at www.schwabetfs.com/prospectus for a free copy of a prospectus, SAI or an annual or semi-annual report.
The SAI, the funds annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the EDGAR Database on the SECs web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the funds, including the funds SAI, at the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SECs Public Reference Room.
SEC File Number
Schwab Strategic Trust |
811-22311 |
REG75704-00
Schwab Fundamental Index ETFs
Prospectus
August 8, 2013
STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Schwab Fundamental Index* ETFs
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | FNDB | |
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | FNDX | |
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF | FNDA | |
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | FNDF | |
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF | FNDC | |
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF | FNDE |
Principal U.S. Listing Exchange: NYSE Arca, Inc.
August 8, 2013
The Statement of Additional Information (SAI) is not a prospectus. It should be read in conjunction with the funds prospectus, dated August 8, 2013 (as amended from time to time).
The funds audited financial statements, as they become available, also contain important financial information about each fund. For a free copy of any of these documents or to request other information or ask questions about the funds, call Schwab ETFs at 1-800-435-4000. For TDD service call 1-800-345-2550. In addition, you may visit Schwab ETFs web site at www.schwabetfs.com/prospectus for a free copy of a prospectus, SAI or an annual or semi-annual report.
Each fund is a series of the Schwab Strategic Trust (the Trust). The funds are part of the Schwab complex of funds (Schwab Funds).
2 | ||||
22 | ||||
23 | ||||
29 | ||||
30 | ||||
31 | ||||
34 | ||||
38 | ||||
38 | ||||
39 | ||||
44 | ||||
APPENDIX - DESCRIPTION OF PROXY VOTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES |
REG75702-00
* | SCHWAB is a registered trademark of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. |
FUNDAMENTAL INDEX is a registered trademark of Research Affiliates LLC.
Investment Objective
Each funds investment objective is not fundamental and therefore may be changed by the funds Board of Trustees without shareholder approval.
The Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF seeks to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Index.
The Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF seeks to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index.
The Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF seeks to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index.
The Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF seeks to as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index.
The Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF seeks to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Small Company Index.
The Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF seeks to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index.
There is no guarantee the funds will achieve their investment objectives.
The Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF, Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF, Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF, Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF, Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF, and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF are collectively referred to as Fundamental Index ETFs.
Fund Investment Policies
It is the Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETFs policy that, under normal circumstances, it will invest at least 90% of its net assets in stocks included in the Russell Fundamental U.S. Index. The fund will notify its shareholders at least 60 days before changing this policy. For purposes of this policy, net assets mean net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes.
It is the Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETFs policy that, under normal circumstances, it will invest at least 90% of its net assets in stocks included in the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index. The fund will notify its shareholders at least 60 days before changing this policy. For purposes of this policy, net assets mean net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes.
It is the Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETFs policy that, under normal circumstances, it will invest at least 90% of its net assets in stocks included in the Russell Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index. The fund will notify its shareholders at least 60 days before changing this policy. For purposes of this policy, net assets mean net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes.
2
It is the Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETFs policy that, under normal circumstances, it will invest at least 90% of its net assets in stocks included in the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index, including depositary receipts representing securities of the index; which may be in the form of ADRs, GDRs and EDRs. The fund will notify its shareholders at least 60 days before changing this policy. For purposes of this policy, net assets mean net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes.
It is the Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETFs policy that, under normal circumstances, it will invest at least 90% of its net assets in stocks included in the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Small Company Index, including depositary receipts representing securities of the index; which may be in the form of ADRs, GDRs and EDRs. The fund will notify its shareholders at least 60 days before changing this policy. For purposes of this policy, net assets mean net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes.
It is the Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETFs policy that, under normal circumstances, it will invest at least 80% of its net assets in stocks included in the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index, including depositary receipts representing securities of the index; which may be in the form of ADRs, GDRs and EDRs. The fund will notify its shareholders at least 60 days before changing this policy. For purposes of this policy, net assets mean net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes.
Description of the Russell Fundamental Indexes
Each Russell Fundamental Index is part of the Russell Fundamental Index ® Series. Each Russell Fundamental Index is compiled and calculated by Russell Investments (Russell) in conjunction with Research Affiliates LLC (RA), and the method of calculating the components of the indices is subject to change. Each Russell Fundamental Index selects and weights stocks according to fundamental measures of company size: adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks. The Russell Fundamental Index Series has a quarterly partial reconstitution. The weighting of the constituents by fundamental scores is determined during the June annual reconstitution. However, this annual reconstitution is spread out equally each quarter. Splitting the index into four equivalent parts (tranches) adds investment capacity.
The Russell Fundamental Index Series is created from the leading Russell 3000 ® and Russell Global ex-U.S. indexes. Constituents are scored and weighted based on fundamental measures of company size, then further divided into large company and small company fundamental indexes. Company size is determined by averaging three key non-price measures using publicly available accounting data from the last five years. Weights are calculated and assigned by RA.
The Russell Fundamental U.S. Index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company sizeadjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybackrather than market capitalization. The Russell Fundamental U.S. Index measures the performance of the constituent companies by the fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies included in the Russell 3000 Index. Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell 3000 Index. The weights of the companies included in the Russell Fundamental U.S. Index are determined annually and are implemented using a partial quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Russell Fundamental U.S. Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. The Russell Fundamental U.S. Index is compiled and calculated by Russell in conjunction with RA, and the method of calculating the components of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Index is subject to change.
The Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index measures the performance of the large company size segment by fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies included in the Russell 3000 Index. Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell 3000 Index. Companies with weights above 87.5% make up the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index. The weights of the companies included in the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index are determined annually and are implemented using a partial quarterly
3
reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. The Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index is compiled and calculated by Russell in conjunction with RA, and the method of calculating the components of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index is subject to change.
The Russell Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The Russell Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index measures the performance of the small company size segment by fundamental overall company scores (scores), which are created using as the universe the companies in the Russell 3000 Index. Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell 3000 Index. Companies with weights below the 87.5% mark make up the Russell Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index. The weights of the companies included in the Russell Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index are determined annually and are implemented using a quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. The Russell Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index is compiled and calculated by Russell in conjunction with RA, and the method of calculating the components of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index is subject to change.
The Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index measures the performance of the large company size segment by fundamental overall company scores, which are created using as the universe the companies in the Russell Developed ex-U.S. Index. Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Developed ex-U.S. Index. Companies with weights above 87.5% make up the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. The weights of the companies included in the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index are determined annually and are implemented using a partial quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. The Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index is compiled and calculated by Russell in conjunction with RA, and the method of calculating the components of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index is subject to change.
The Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Small Company Index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Small Company Index measures the performance of the small company size segment by fundamental overall company scores, which are created using as the universe the companies in the Russell Developed ex-U.S. Index. Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Developed ex-U.S. Index. Companies with weights below the 87.5% mark make up the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Small Company Index. The weights of the companies included in the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Small Company Index are determined annually and are implemented using a partial quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. The Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Small Company Index is compiled and calculated by Russell in conjunction with RA, and the method of calculating the components of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Small Company Index is subject to change.
The Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index measures the performance of the large company size segment by fundamental overall company scores, which are created using as the universe the companies in the Russell Emerging Markets Index. Securities are grouped in order of decreasing score and each company receives a weight based on the total weights of the companies within the Russell Emerging Markets Index. Companies with weights above 87.5% make up the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index. The weights of the companies included in the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index are determined annually
4
and are implemented using a partial quarterly reconstitution methodology in which the Index is split into four equal segments and each segment is rebalanced on a rolling quarterly basis. The Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index is compiled and calculated by Russell in conjunction with RA, and the method of calculating the components of the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index is subject to change.
Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. (CSIM), the funds investment adviser, has entered into an agreement with Frank Russell Company, pursuant to which, CSIM has been granted a license to certain of the Russell Fundamental Indexes and the Russell trademarks, which has in turn been sublicensed to the Fundamental Index ETFs. Fees payable under the license agreement are paid by CSIM.
Russell and RA have entered into a strategic alliance with respect to the Russell Fundamental Indexes. Subject to RAs intellectual property rights in certain content, Russell is the owner of all copyrights related to the Russell Fundamental Indexes and the Russell Fundamental Indexes are used by the funds under license. Russell and RA jointly own all trademark and service mark rights in and to the Russell Fundamental Indexes. RA is the owner of the trademarks, service marks, patents and copyrights related to the Fundamental Index and the Fundamental Index methodology.
The Fundamental Index ETFs are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Russell. Russell makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, to the owners of the Fundamental Index ETFs or any member of the public regarding the advisability of investing in securities generally or in the Fundamental Index ETFs particularly or the ability of the Russell Fundamental Indexes to track general stock market performance or a segment of the same. Russells publication of the Russell Fundamental Indexes in no way suggests or implies an opinion by Russell as to the advisability of investment in any or all of the securities upon which the Russell Fundamental Indexes are based. Russells only relationship to CSIM is the licensing of certain trademarks and trade names of Russell and of the Russell Fundamental Indexes which are determined, composed and calculated by Russell without regard to CSIM or the Fundamental Index ETFs. Russell is not responsible for and has not reviewed the Fundamental Index ETFs nor any associated literature or publications and Russell makes no representation or warranty express or implied as to their accuracy or completeness, or otherwise. Russell reserves the right, at any time and without notice, to alter, amend, terminate or in any way change the Russell Fundamental Indexes. Russell has no obligation or liability in connection with the administration, marketing or trading of the Fundamental Index ETFs.
Russell does not guarantee the accuracy and/or the completeness of the Russell Fundamental Indexes or any data included therein and Russell shall have no liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions therein. Russell makes no warranty, express or implied, as to results to be obtained by CSIM, investors, owners of the Fundamental Index ETFs, or any other person or entity from the use of the Russell Fundamental Indexes or any data included therein. Russell makes no express or implied warranties, and expressly disclaims all warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use with respect to the Russell Fundamental Indexes or any data included therein. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall Russell have any liability for any special, punitive, indirect, or consequential damages (including lost profits), even if notified of the possibility of such damages.
Investments, Risks and Limitations
The following investment strategies, risks and limitations supplement those set forth in the prospectus and may be changed without shareholder approval unless otherwise noted. Also, policies and limitations that state a maximum percentage of assets that may be invested in a security or other asset, or that set forth a quality standard, shall be measured immediately after and as a result of a funds acquisition of such security or asset unless otherwise noted. Thus, except with respect to limitations on borrowing and futures and option contracts, any subsequent change in values, net assets or other circumstances does not require a fund to sell an investment if it could not then make the same investment.
5
Principal Investment Strategy Investments
Unless otherwise indicated, the following investments may be used as part of each funds principal investment strategy.
Concentration means that substantial amounts of assets are invested in a particular industry or group of industries. Concentration increases investment exposure to industry risk. For example, the automobile industry may have a greater exposure to a single factor, such as an increase in the price of oil, which may adversely affect the sale of automobiles and, as a result, the value of the industrys securities. As part of each funds principal investment strategy, each fund will concentrate its investments in a particular industry or group of industries only to approximately the same extent that its benchmark index concentrates in the securities of such particular industry or group of industries.
Depositary Receipts (Principal investment for the Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF, Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF). Depositary receipts include American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) as well as other hybrid forms of ADRs, such as European Depositary Receipts (EDRs) and Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs), are certificates evidencing ownership of shares of a foreign issuer. Depositary receipts may be sponsored or unsponsored. These certificates are issued by depository banks and generally trade on an established market in the United States or elsewhere. The underlying shares are held in trust by a custodian bank or similar financial institution in the issuers home country. The depository bank may not have physical custody of the underlying securities at all times and may charge fees for various services, including forwarding dividends and interest and corporate actions. ADRs are alternatives to directly purchasing the underlying foreign securities in their national markets and currencies. However, ADRs continue to be subject to many of the risks associated with investing directly in foreign securities.
Investments in the securities of foreign issuers may subject a fund to investment risks that differ in some respects from those related to investments in securities of U.S. issuers. Such risks include future adverse political and economic developments, possible imposition of withholding taxes on income, possible seizure, nationalization or expropriation of foreign deposits, possible establishment of exchange controls or taxation at the source or greater fluctuation in value due to changes in exchange rates. Foreign issuers of securities often engage in business practices different from those of domestic issuers of similar securities, and there may be less information publicly available about foreign issuers. In addition, foreign issuers are, generally speaking, subject to less government supervision and regulation and different accounting treatment than are those in the United States.
Although the two types of depositary receipt facilities (unsponsored or sponsored) are similar, there are differences regarding a holders rights and obligations and the practices of market participants. A depository may establish an unsponsored facility without participation by (or acquiescence of) the underlying issuer; typically, however, the depository requests a letter of non-objection from the underlying issuer prior to establishing the facility. Holders of unsponsored depositary receipts generally bear all the costs of the facility. The depository usually charges fees upon the deposit and withdrawal of the underlying securities, the conversion of dividends into U.S. dollars or other currency, the disposition of non-cash distributions, and the performance of other services. The depository of an unsponsored facility frequently is under no obligation to distribute shareholder communications received from the underlying issuer or to pass through voting rights to depositary receipt holders with respect to the underlying securities.
Sponsored depositary receipt facilities are created in generally the same manner as unsponsored facilities, except that sponsored depositary receipts are established jointly by a depository and the underlying issuer through a deposit agreement. The deposit agreement sets out the rights and responsibilities of the underlying issuer, the depository, and the depositary receipt holders. With sponsored facilities, the underlying issuer typically bears some of the costs of the depositary receipts (such as dividend payment fees of the depository), although most sponsored depositary receipts holders may bear costs such as deposit and withdrawal fees. Depositories of most sponsored depositary receipts agree to distribute notices of shareholder meetings, voting instructions, and other shareholder communications and information to the depositary receipt holders at the underlying issuers request.
Derivative Instruments are commonly defined to include securities or contracts whose values depend on (or derive from) the value of one or more other assets such as securities, currencies, or commodities. These other assets are commonly referred to as underlying assets. The funds may use derivatives, principally futures contracts, primarily to seek returns on a funds otherwise uninvested cash assets.
6
A derivative instrument generally consists of, is based upon, or exhibits characteristics similar to options or forward contracts. Options and forward contracts are considered to be the basic building blocks of derivatives. For example, forward-based derivatives include forward contracts, as well as exchange-traded futures. Option-based derivatives include privately negotiated, over-the-counter (OTC) options (including caps, floors, collars, and options on forward and swap contracts) and exchange-traded options on futures. Diverse types of derivatives may be created by combining options or forward contracts in different ways, and applying these structures to a wide range of underlying assets.
Risk management strategies include investment techniques designed to facilitate the sale of portfolio securities, manage the average duration of the portfolio or create or alter exposure to certain asset classes, such as equity, other debt or foreign securities.
In addition to the derivative instruments and strategies described in this SAI, the investment adviser expects to discover additional derivative instruments and other investment, hedging or risk management techniques. The investment adviser may utilize these new derivative instruments and techniques to the extent that they are consistent with a funds investment objective and permitted by a funds investment limitations, operating policies, and applicable regulatory authorities.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regulates the trading of commodity interests, including certain futures contracts, options, and swaps in which a fund may invest. A fund that invests in commodity interests is subject to certain CFTC regulatory requirements, including certain limits on its trades in futures contracts, options and swaps to qualify for certain exclusions or exemptions from registration requirements. The Trust, on behalf of each fund, has filed a notice of eligibility for exclusion from the definition of the term commodity pool operator (CPO) under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (CEA), with respect to each funds operation. Therefore, each fund and its investment adviser are not subject to regulation as a commodity pool or CPO under the CEA and the investment adviser is not subject to registration as a CPO. If a fund were no longer able to claim the exclusion, the funds investment adviser may be required to register as a CPO and the fund and its investment adviser would be subject to regulation as a commodity pool or CPO under the CEA. If a fund or its investment adviser is subject to CFTC regulation, it may incur additional expenses.
Futures Contracts are instruments that represent an agreement between two parties that obligates one party to buy, and the other party to sell, specific instruments at an agreed-upon price on a stipulated future date. In the case of futures contracts relating to an index or otherwise not calling for physical delivery at the close of the transaction, the parties usually agree to deliver the final cash settlement price of the contract. A fund may purchase and sell futures contracts based on securities, securities indices and foreign currencies, interest rates, or any other futures contracts traded on U.S. exchanges or boards of trade that the CFTC licenses and regulates on foreign exchanges. Consistent with CFTC regulations, the fund has claimed an exclusion from the definition of the term commodity pool operator under the Commodity Exchange Act and, therefore, is not subject to registration or regulation as a pool operator. However, investors should note that the CFTC has adopted certain rules that significantly affect the exclusion available to the fund. CFTC rules require that the fund claiming an exclusion from commodity pool operator registration limit its trades in futures contracts with certain limited exceptions. If the fund is unable to claim an exclusion from registration, the funds adviser may be required to register as a commodity pool operator and comply with certain CFTC rules. Additional CFTC regulation may cause the fund to change its investment strategies or to incur additional expenses.
A fund must maintain a small portion of its assets in cash to process certain shareholder transactions in and out of it and to pay its expenses. To reduce the effect this otherwise uninvested cash would have on its performance, a fund may purchase futures contracts. Such transactions allow a funds cash balance to produce a return similar to that of the underlying security or index on which the futures contract is based. Also, a fund may purchase or sell futures contracts on a specified foreign currency to fix the price in U.S. dollars of the foreign security it has acquired or sold or expects to acquire or sell. A fund may enter into futures contracts for other reasons as well.
7
When buying or selling futures contracts, a fund must place a deposit with its broker equal to a fraction of the contract amount. This amount is known as initial margin and must be in the form of liquid debt instruments, including cash, cash-equivalents and U.S. government securities. Subsequent payments to and from the broker, known as variation margin may be made daily, if necessary, as the value of the futures contracts fluctuate. This process is known as marking-to-market. The margin amount will be returned to a fund upon termination of the futures contracts assuming all contractual obligations are satisfied. Because margin requirements are normally only a fraction of the amount of the futures contracts in a given transaction, futures trading can involve a great deal of leverage. In order to avoid this, a fund will earmark or segregate assets for any outstanding futures contracts as may be required under the federal securities laws.
While a fund may purchase and sell futures contracts to simulate full investment, there are risks associated with these transactions. Adverse market movements could cause a fund to experience substantial losses when buying and selling futures contracts. Of course, barring significant market distortions, similar results would have been expected if a fund had instead transacted in the underlying securities directly. There also is the risk of losing any margin payments held by a broker in the event of its bankruptcy. Additionally, a fund incurs transaction costs (e.g., brokerage fees) when engaging in futures trading. To the extent a fund also invests in futures to simulate full investment, these same risks apply.
Futures contracts normally require actual delivery or acquisition of an underlying security or cash value of an index on the expiration date of the contract. In most cases, however, the contractual obligation is fulfilled before the date of the contract by buying or selling, as the case may be, identical futures contracts. Such offsetting transactions terminate the original contracts and cancel the obligation to take or make delivery of the underlying securities or cash. There may not always be a liquid secondary market at the time a fund seeks to close out a futures position. If a fund is unable to close out its position and prices move adversely, a fund would have to continue to make daily cash payments to maintain its margin requirements. If a fund had insufficient cash to meet these requirements it may have to sell portfolio securities at a disadvantageous time or incur extra costs by borrowing the cash. Also, a fund may be required to make or take delivery and incur extra transaction costs buying or selling the underlying securities. A fund seeks to reduce the risks associated with futures transactions by buying and selling futures contracts that are traded on national exchanges or for which there appears to be a liquid secondary market.
With respect to futures contracts that are not legally required to cash settle, a fund may cover the open position by setting aside or earmarking liquid assets in an amount equal to the market value of the futures contracts. With respect to futures contracts that are required to cash settle, however, a fund is permitted to set aside or earmark liquid assets in an amount equal to the funds daily marked to market (net) obligation, if any, (in other words, the funds daily net liability, if any) rather than the market value of the futures contracts. By setting aside assets or earmarking equal to only its net obligation under cash-settled futures, a fund will have the ability to employ leverage to a greater extent than if the fund were required to set aside or earmark assets equal to the full market value of the futures contract.
Diversification involves investing in a wide range of securities and thereby spreading and reducing the risks of investment. Each fund is a series of an open-end investment management company with limited redeemability. The funds are diversified exchange traded funds. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of market loss.
Emerging or Developing Markets (Principal investment for the Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF only. Permissible non-principal investment for all other funds.) Emerging or developing markets exist in countries that are considered to be in the initial stages of industrialization. The risks of investing in these markets are similar to the risks of international investing in general, although the risks are greater in emerging and developing markets. Countries with emerging or developing securities markets tend to have economic structures that are less stable than countries with developed securities markets. This is because their economies may be based on only a few industries and their securities markets may trade a small number of securities. Prices on these exchanges tend to be volatile, and securities in these countries historically have offered greater potential for gain (as well as loss) than securities of companies located in developed countries.
8
A funds investments in emerging markets can be considered speculative, and therefore may offer higher potential for gains and losses than investments in developed markets of the world. With respect to an emerging country, there may be a greater potential for nationalization, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, political changes, government regulation, social instability or diplomatic developments (including war) which could affect adversely the economies of such countries or investments in such countries. The economies of developing countries generally are heavily dependent upon international trade and, accordingly, have been and may continue to be adversely affected by trade barriers, exchange or currency controls, managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protectionist measures imposed or negotiated by the countries with which they trade.
Equity Securities represent ownership interests in a company, and are commonly called stocks. Equity securities historically have outperformed most other securities, although their prices can fluctuate based on changes in a companys financial condition, market conditions and political, economic or even company-specific news. When a stocks price declines, its market value is lowered even though the intrinsic value of the company may not have changed. Sometimes factors, such as economic conditions or political events, affect the value of stocks of companies of the same or similar industry or group of industries, and may affect the entire stock market.
Types of equity securities include common stocks, preferred stocks, convertible securities, warrants, ADRs, EDRs, and interests in real estate investment trusts, (for more information on real estate investment trusts, REITs, see the section entitled Real Estate Investment Trusts).
Common stocks , which are probably the most recognized type of equity security, represent an equity or ownership interest in an issuer and usually entitle the owner to voting rights in the election of the corporations directors and any other matters submitted to the corporations shareholders for voting, as well as to receive dividends on such stock. The market value of common stock can fluctuate widely, as it reflects increases and decreases in an issuers earnings. In the event an issuer is liquidated or declares bankruptcy, the claims of bond owners, other debt holders and owners of preferred stock take precedence over the claims of common stock owners.
Preferred stocks are a permissible non-principal investment for each fund. Preferred stocks represent an equity or ownership interest in an issuer but do not ordinarily carry voting rights, though they may carry limited voting rights. Preferred stocks normally have preference over the corporations assets and earnings, however. For example, preferred stocks have preference over common stock in the payment of dividends. Preferred stocks normally pay dividends at a specified rate. However, preferred stock may be purchased where the issuer has omitted, or is in danger of omitting, payment of its dividend. Such investments would be made primarily for their capital appreciation potential. In the event an issuer is liquidated or declares bankruptcy, the claims of bond owners take precedence over the claims of preferred and common stock owners. Certain classes of preferred stock are convertible into shares of common stock of the issuer. By holding convertible preferred stock, a fund can receive a steady stream of dividends and still have the option to convert the preferred stock to common stock. Preferred stock is subject to many of the same risks as common stock and debt securities.
Convertible securities are a permissible non-principal investment for each fund. Convertible securities are typically preferred stocks or bonds that are exchangeable for a specific number of another form of security (usually the issuers common stock) at a specified price or ratio. A convertible security generally entitles the holder to receive interest paid or accrued on bonds or the dividend paid on preferred stock until the convertible security matures or is redeemed, converted or exchanged. A corporation may issue a convertible security that is subject to redemption after a specified date, and usually under certain circumstances. A holder of a convertible security that is called for redemption would be required to tender it for redemption to the issuer, convert it to the underlying common stock or sell it to a third party. The convertible structure allows the holder of the convertible bond to participate in share price movements in the companys common stock. The actual return on a convertible bond may exceed its stated yield if the companys common stock appreciates in value and the option to convert to common stocks becomes more valuable.
9
Convertible securities typically pay a lower interest rate than nonconvertible bonds of the same quality and maturity because of the convertible feature. Convertible securities are also rated below investment grade (high yield) or are not rated, and are subject to credit risk.
Prior to conversion, convertible securities have characteristics and risks similar to nonconvertible debt and equity securities. In addition, convertible securities are often concentrated in economic sectors, which, like the stock market in general, may experience unpredictable declines in value, as well as periods of poor performance, which may last for several years. There may be a small trading market for a particular convertible security at any given time, which may adversely impact market price and a funds ability to liquidate a particular security or respond to an economic event, including deterioration of an issuers creditworthiness.
Convertible preferred stocks are nonvoting equity securities that pay a fixed dividend. These securities have a convertible feature similar to convertible bonds, but do not have a maturity date. Due to their fixed income features, convertible securities provide higher income potential than the issuers common stock, but typically are more sensitive to interest rate changes than the underlying common stock. In the event of a companys liquidation, bondholders have claims on company assets senior to those of shareholders; preferred shareholders have claims senior to those of common shareholders.
Convertible securities typically trade at prices above their conversion value, which is the current market value of the common stock received upon conversion, because of their higher yield potential than the underlying common stock. The difference between the conversion value and the price of a convertible security will vary depending on the value of the underlying common stock and interest rates. When the underlying value of the common stocks declines, the price of the issuers convertible securities will tend not to fall as much because the convertible securitys income potential will act as a price support. While the value of a convertible security also tends to rise when the underlying common stock value rises, it will not rise as much because their conversion value is more narrow. The value of convertible securities also is affected by changes in interest rates. For example, when interest rates fall, the value of convertible securities may rise because of their fixed income component.
Warrants are a permissible non-principal investment for each fund. Warrants are types of securities usually issued with bonds and preferred stock that entitle the holder to purchase a proportionate amount of common stock at a specified price for a specific period of time. The prices of warrants do not necessarily move parallel to the prices of the underlying common stock. Warrants have no voting rights, receive no dividends and have no rights with respect to the assets of the issuer. If a warrant is not exercised within the specified time period, it will become worthless and a fund will lose the purchase price it paid for the warrant and the right to purchase the underlying security.
Initial Public Offering . As part of its non-principal investment strategy, each fund may purchase shares issued as part of, or a short period after, a companys initial public offering (IPOs), and may at times dispose of those shares shortly after their acquisition. A funds purchase of shares issued in IPOs exposes it to the risks associated with companies that have little operating history as public companies, as well as to the risks inherent in those sectors of the market where these new issuers operate. The market for IPO issuers has been volatile, and share prices of newly-public companies have fluctuated significantly over short periods of time.
Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) . As part of its non-principal investment strategy, each fund may purchase units of MLPs. MLPs are limited partnerships or limited liability companies, whose partnership units or limited liability interests are listed and traded on a U.S. securities exchange, and are treated as publicly traded partnerships for federal income tax purposes. To qualify to be treated as a partnership for tax purposes, an MLP must receive at least 90% of its income from qualifying sources as set forth in Section 7704(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Internal Revenue Code). These qualifying sources include activities such as the exploration, development, mining, production, processing, refining, transportation, storage and marketing of mineral or natural resources. MLPs generally have two classes of owners, the general partner and limited partners. MLPs that are formed as limited liability companies generally have two analogous classes of owners, the managing member and the members. For purposes of this section,
10
references to general partners also apply to managing members and references to limited partners also apply to members. The general partner is typically owned by a major energy company, an investment fund, the direct management of the MLP or is an entity owned by one or more of such parties. The general partner may be structured as a private or publicly traded corporation or other entity. The general partner typically controls the operations and management of the MLP through an equity interest of as much as 2% in the MLP plus, in many cases, ownership of common units and subordinated units. Limited partners own the remainder of the MLP through ownership of common units and have a limited role in the MLPs operations and management.
MLPs are typically structured such that common units and general partner interests have first priority to receive quarterly cash distributions up to an established minimum amount (minimum quarterly distributions or MQD). Common and general partner interests also accrue arrearages in distributions to the extent the MQD is not paid. Once common and general partner interests have been paid, subordinated units receive distributions of up to the MQD; however, subordinated units do not accrue arrearages. Distributable cash in excess of the MQD paid to both common and subordinated units is distributed to both common and subordinated units generally on a pro rata basis. The general partner is also eligible to receive incentive distributions if the general partner operates the business in a manner which results in distributions paid per common unit surpassing specified target levels. As the general partner increases cash distributions to the limited partners, the general partner receives an increasingly higher percentage of the incremental cash distributions. A common arrangement provides that the general partner can reach a tier where it receives 50% of every incremental dollar paid to common and subordinated unit holders. These incentive distributions encourage the general partner to streamline costs, increase capital expenditures and acquire assets in order to increase the partnerships cash flow and raise the quarterly cash distribution in order to reach higher tiers. Such results benefit all security holders of the MLP.
General partner interests of MLPs are typically retained by an MLPs original sponsors, such as its founders, corporate partners, entities that sell assets to the MLP and investors such as us. A holder of general partner interests can be liable under certain circumstances for amounts greater than the amount of the holders investment in the general partner interest. General partner interests often confer direct board participation rights and in many cases, operating control, over the MLP. These interests themselves are not publicly traded, although they may be owned by publicly traded entities. General partner interests receive cash distributions, typically 2% of the MLPs aggregate cash distributions, which are contractually defined in the partnership agreement. In addition, holders of general partner interests typically hold incentive distribution rights, which provide them with a larger share of the aggregate MLP cash distributions as the distributions to limited partner unit holders are increased to prescribed levels. General partner interests generally cannot be converted into common units. The general partner interest can be redeemed by the MLP if the MLP unitholders choose to remove the general partner, typically with a supermajority vote by limited partner unitholders.
Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) such as the funds or Standard and Poors Depositary Receipts (SPDRs) Trust, are investment companies that typically are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act) as open-end funds (as is the funds case) or unit investment trusts (UITs). ETFs are actively traded on national securities exchanges and are generally based on specific domestic and foreign market indices. Shares of an ETF may be bought and sold throughout the day at market prices, which may be higher or lower than the shares net asset value. An index-based ETF seeks to track the performance of an index holding in its portfolio either the contents of the index or a representative sample of the securities in the index. Because ETFs are based on an underlying basket of stocks or an index, they are subject to the same market fluctuations as these types of securities in volatile market swings. ETFs, like mutual funds, have expenses associated with their operation, including advisory fees. When a fund invests in an ETF, in addition to directly bearing expenses associated with its own operations, it will bear a pro rata portion of the ETFs expenses. As with any exchange listed security, ETF shares purchased in the secondary market are subject to customary brokerage charges.
Foreign Securities (Principal investment of the Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF, Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF only. Permissible non-principal investment for all other funds). Foreign securities involve additional risks, including foreign currency exchange rate risks, because they are issued by foreign entities, including foreign governments,
11
banks and corporations or because they are traded principally overseas. A funds investments in foreign securities may include securities of issuers domiciled in a foreign jurisdiction but which are listed on a U.S. exchange and included in the funds index, as well as securities generally available in foreign markets. Foreign securities in which a fund may invest include foreign entities that are not subject to uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards, practices and requirements comparable to those applicable to U.S. corporations. In addition, there may be less publicly available information about foreign entities. Foreign economic, political and legal developments, as well as fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates and withholding taxes, could have more dramatic effects on the value of foreign securities. For example, conditions within and around foreign countries, such as the possibility of expropriation or confiscatory taxation, political or social instability, diplomatic developments, change of government or war could affect the value of foreign investments. Moreover, individual foreign economies may differ favorably or unfavorably from the U.S. economy in such respects as growth of gross national product, rate of inflation, capital reinvestment, resource self-sufficiency and balance of payments position.
Foreign securities typically have less volume and are generally less liquid and more volatile than securities of U.S. companies. Fixed commissions on foreign securities exchanges are generally higher than negotiated commissions on U.S. exchanges, although a fund will endeavor to achieve the most favorable overall results on portfolio transactions. There is generally less government supervision and regulation of foreign securities exchanges, brokers, dealers and listed companies than in the United States, thus increasing the risk of delayed settlements of portfolio transactions or loss of certificates for portfolio securities. There may be difficulties in obtaining or enforcing judgments against foreign issuers as well. These factors and others may increase the risks with respect to the liquidity of a fund, and its ability to meet a large number of shareholder redemption requests.
Foreign markets also have different clearance and settlement procedures and, in certain markets, there have been times when settlements have been unable to keep pace with the volume of securities transactions, making it difficult to conduct such transactions. Such delays in settlement could result in temporary periods when a portion of the assets of a fund is uninvested and no return is earned thereon. The inability to make intended security purchases due to settlement problems could cause a fund to miss attractive investment opportunities. Losses to a fund arising out of the inability to fulfill a contract to sell such securities also could result in potential liability for a fund.
Investments in the securities of foreign issuers may be made and held in foreign currencies. In addition, a fund may hold cash in foreign currencies. These investments may be affected favorably or unfavorably by changes in currency rates and in exchange control regulations, and may cause a fund to incur costs in connection with conversions between various currencies. The rate of exchange between the U.S. dollar and other currencies is determined by the forces of supply and demand in the foreign exchange market as well as by political and economic factors. Changes in the foreign currency exchange rates also may affect the value of dividends and interest earned, gains and losses realized on the sale of securities, and net investment income and gains, if any, to be distributed to shareholders by a fund.
Financial markets in the eurozone have experienced volatility over the past few years due, in part, to concerns about rising levels of government debt and the prevalence of increased budget deficits. Delays by politicians and regulators to address structural and policy issues in the eurozone have added to instability in the region. The implementation of austerity measures in Spain, Italy, Greece, Portugal and Ireland at a time when the eurozone is experiencing higher unemployment and slowing economic activity has raised the possibility of a prolonged recession in the region. However, recent policy actions by leaders of the European Union (EU) and the European Central Bank have significantly reduced the possibility of default by a eurozone government and have reduced market volatility.
The severity and prolonged nature of the eurozone crisis caused certain individuals and institutions to question the continued viability of the euro as a unit of currency. It is possible individual EU member countries that have already adopted the euro may abandon that currency and revert to a national currency or otherwise exit the EU. It is also possible that the euro will cease to exist as a single unit of currency in its current form. The precise effects of any such outcome on regional or global financial markets are impossible to predict. However, the abandonment of the euro or the exit of any country out of the EU would likely have an extremely destabilizing effect on all EU member countries and their economies, which would likely impact the global economy.
12
As the funds may hold certain investments of issuers located in the eurozone, any material negative developments in the region could have a negative impact on the investments held by the funds, which could hurt their overall performance.
Indexing Strategies involve tracking the securities represented in, and therefore the performance of, an index. Each fund normally will invest primarily in the securities of its index. Moreover, each fund seeks to invest so that its portfolio performs similarly to that of its index. Each fund will seek over time a correlation between its performance and that of its index, before fees and expenses, of 0.95 or better. Correlation for each fund is calculated daily, according to a mathematical formula which measures correlation between a funds portfolio and benchmark index returns. A perfect correlation of 1.0 is unlikely as the funds incur operating and trading expenses unlike their indices. Each fund may rebalance its holdings in order to track its index more closely. In the event its intended correlation is not achieved, the Board of Trustees will consider alternative arrangements for each fund.
There can be no guarantee that the performance of a fund will achieve a high degree of correlation with that of its index. A number of factors may affect a funds ability to achieve a high correlation with its index, including the degree to which a fund utilizes a sampling technique. The correlation between the performance of a fund and its index may also diverge due to transaction costs, asset valuations, corporate actions (such as mergers and spinoffs), timing variances, and differences between a funds portfolio and the index resulting from legal restrictions such as diversification requirements) that apply to a fund but not to the index.
Mid-Cap Stocks include common stocks issued by operating companies with market capitalizations that place them between the upper and lower end of the stock market, as well as the stocks of companies that are determined to be mid-sized based on several factors, including the capitalization of the company and the amount of revenues. Historically, mid-cap stocks have been riskier than large-cap stocks. Mid-cap companies themselves may be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic events than larger, more established companies. Stock prices of mid-sized companies may be based in substantial part on future expectations rather than current achievements and may move sharply, especially during market upturns and downturns. During a period when mid-cap stocks fall behind other types of investments bonds or large-cap stocks, for instance the funds mid-cap holdings could reduce performance.
Mid-cap companies may have less certain growth prospects and are typically less diversified and less able to withstand changing economic conditions than larger capitalized companies. Mid-cap companies also may have more limited product lines, markets or financial resources than companies with larger capitalizations, and may be more dependent on a relatively smaller management group. In addition, mid-cap companies may not be well known to the investing public, may not have institutional ownership and may have only cyclical, static or moderate growth prospects. Mid-cap company stocks may pay low or no dividends. These factors and others may cause sharp changes in the value of a mid-cap companys stock, and even cause some mid-cap companies to fail. While mid-cap stocks are generally considered to offer greater growth opportunities for investors than large-cap stocks, they involve greater risks and the share price of a fund that invests in mid-cap stocks may change sharply during the short term and long term.
Money Market Securities are high-quality, short term debt securities that may be issued by entities such as the U.S. government, corporations and financial institutions (like banks). Money market securities include commercial paper, certificates of deposit, bankers acceptances, notes and time deposits. Certificates of deposit and time deposits are issued against funds deposited in a banking institution for a specified period of time at a specified interest rate. Bankers acceptances are credit instruments evidencing a banks obligation to pay a draft drawn on it by a customer. These instruments reflect the obligation both of the bank and of the drawer to pay the full amount of the instrument upon maturity. Commercial paper consists of short term, unsecured promissory notes issued to finance short term credit needs.
13
Money market securities pay fixed, variable or floating rates of interest and are generally subject to credit and interest rate risks. The maturity date or price of and financial assets collateralizing a security may be structured in order to make it qualify as or act like a money market security. These securities may be subject to greater credit and interest rate risks than other money market securities because of their structure. Money market securities may be issued with puts or sold separately, sometimes called demand features or guarantees, which are agreements that allow the buyer to sell a security at a specified price and time to the seller or put provider. When a fund buys a put, losses could occur as a result of the costs of the put or if it exercises its rights under the put and the put provider does not perform as agreed.
A fund may keep a portion of its assets in cash for business operations. To reduce the effect this otherwise uninvested cash would have on its performance, a fund may invest in money market securities. A fund may also invest in money market securities to the extent it is consistent with its investment objective.
Bankers Acceptances or notes are credit instruments evidencing a banks obligation to pay a draft drawn on it by a customer. These instruments reflect the obligation both of the bank and of the drawer to pay the full amount of the instrument upon maturity. The fund will invest only in bankers acceptances of banks that have capital, surplus and undivided profits in the aggregate in excess of $100 million.
Certificates of Deposit or time deposits are issued against funds deposited in a banking institution for a specified period of time at a specified interest rate. The fund will invest only in certificates of deposit of banks that have capital, surplus and undivided profits in the aggregate in excess of $100 million.
Commercial Paper consists of short term, promissory notes issued by banks, corporations and other institutions to finance short term credit needs. These securities generally are discounted but sometimes may be interest bearing. Commercial paper, which also may be unsecured, is subject to credit risk.
Fixed Time Deposits are bank obligations payable at a stated maturity date and bearing interest at a fixed rate. Fixed time deposits may be withdrawn on demand by the investor, but may be subject to early withdrawal penalties, which vary depending upon market conditions and the remaining maturity of the obligation. There are no contractual restrictions on the right to transfer a beneficial interest in a fixed time deposit to a third party, although there is no market for such deposits. The fund will not invest in fixed time deposits that (1) are not subject to prepayment or (2) provide for withdrawal penalties upon prepayment (other than overnight deposits) if, in the aggregate, more than 15% of its net assets would be invested in such deposits, repurchase agreements maturing in more than seven days and other illiquid assets.
Promissory Notes are written agreements committing the maker or issuer to pay the payee a specified amount either on demand or at a fixed date in the future, with or without interest. These are sometimes called negotiable notes or instruments and are subject to credit risk. Bank notes are notes used to represent obligations issued by banks in large denominations.
Securities Lending of portfolio securities is a common practice in the securities industry. A fund may engage in security lending arrangements. For example, a fund may receive cash collateral, and it may invest it in short term, interest-bearing obligations, but will do so only to the extent that it will not lose the tax treatment available to regulated investment companies. Lending portfolio securities involves risks that the borrower may fail to return the securities or provide additional collateral. Also, voting rights with respect to the loaned securities may pass with the lending of the securities.
A fund may loan portfolio securities to qualified broker-dealers or other institutional investors provided: (1) the loan is secured continuously by collateral consisting of U.S. government securities, letters of credit, cash or cash equivalents or other appropriate instruments maintained on a daily marked-to-market basis in an amount at least equal to the current market value of the securities loaned; (2) a fund may at any time call the loan and obtain the return of the securities loaned; (3) a fund will receive any interest or dividends paid on the loaned securities; and (4) the aggregate market value of securities loaned will not at any time exceed one-third of the total assets of a fund, including collateral received from the loan (at market value computed at the time of the loan).
14
Although voting rights with respect to loaned securities pass to the borrower, the lender retains the right to recall a security (or terminate a loan) for the purpose of exercising the securitys voting rights. Efforts to recall such securities promptly may be unsuccessful, especially for foreign securities or thinly traded securities such as small-cap stocks. In addition, because recalling a security may involve expenses to a fund, it is expected that a fund will do so only where the items being voted upon are, in the judgment of the investment adviser, either are material to the economic value of the security or threaten to materially impact the issuers corporate governance policies or structure.
Securities of Other Investment Companies. Investment companies generally offer investors the advantages of diversification and professional investment management, by combining shareholders money and investing it in securities such as stocks, bonds and money market instruments. Investment companies include: (1) open-end funds (commonly called mutual funds) that issue and redeem their shares on a continuous basis; (2) closed-end funds that offer a fixed number of shares, and are usually listed on an exchange; and (3) unit investment trusts that generally offer a fixed number of redeemable shares. Certain open-end funds, closed-end funds and unit investment trusts are traded on exchanges.
Investment companies may make investments and use techniques designed to enhance their performance. These may include delayed-delivery and when-issued securities transactions; swap agreements; buying and selling futures contracts, illiquid, and/or restricted securities and repurchase agreements; and borrowing or lending money and/or portfolio securities. The risks of investing in a particular investment company will generally reflect the risks of the securities in which it invests and the investment techniques it employs. Also, investment companies charge fees and incur expenses.
The funds may buy securities of other investment companies, including those of foreign issuers, in compliance with the requirements of federal law or any Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) exemptive order. A fund may invest in investment companies that are not registered with the SEC or privately placed securities of investment companies (which may or may not be registered), such as hedge funds and offshore funds. Unregistered funds are largely exempt from the regulatory requirements that apply to registered investment companies. As a result, unregistered funds may have a greater ability to make investments, or use investment techniques, that offer a higher potential investment return (for example, leveraging), but which may carry high risk. Unregistered funds, while not regulated by the SEC like registered funds, may be indirectly supervised by the financial institutions (e.g., commercial and investment banks) that may provide them with loans or other sources of capital. Investments in unregistered funds may be difficult to sell, which could cause a fund selling an interest in an unregistered fund to lose money. For example, many hedge funds require their investors to hold their investments for at least one year.
Federal law restricts the ability of one registered investment company to invest in another. As a result, the extent to which a fund may invest in another investment company may be limited. With respect to investments in certain other investment companies (most typically ETFs), the funds may rely on an exemption from the limitations of the 1940 Act granted by the SEC to such other investment companies that restrict the amount of securities of those investment companies a fund may hold, provided that certain conditions are met. The conditions requested by the SEC were designed to address certain abuses perceived to be associated with funds of funds, including unnecessary costs (such as sales loads, advisory fees and administrative costs), and undue influence by a fund of funds over the underlying fund. The conditions apply only when a fund and its affiliates in the aggregate own more than 3% of the outstanding shares of any one underlying fund.
Under the terms of the exemptive order, each fund and its affiliates may not control a non-affiliated underlying fund. Under the 1940 Act, any person who owns beneficially, either directly or through one or more controlled companies, more than 25% of the voting securities of a company is assumed to control that company. This limitation is measured at the time the investment is made.
Small-Cap Stocks (Principal investment for the Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF, Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF and Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF only. Permissible non-principal investment for all other funds.) Small-cap stocks include common stocks issued by operating companies with market capitalizations that place them at the lower end of the stock market, as well as the stocks of companies that are determined to be small based on several factors, including the capitalization of the company and the
15
amount of revenues. Historically, small company stocks have been riskier than stocks issued by large- or mid-cap companies for a variety of reasons. Small-companies may have less certain growth prospects and are typically less diversified and less able to withstand changing economic conditions than larger capitalized companies. Small-cap companies also may have more limited product lines, markets or financial resources than companies with larger capitalizations, and may be more dependent on a relatively small management group. In addition, small-cap companies may not be well known to the investing public, may not have institutional ownership and may have only cyclical, static or moderate growth prospects. Most small company stocks pay low or no dividends.
These factors and others may cause sharp changes in the value of a small companys stock, and even cause some small-cap companies to fail. Additionally, small-cap stocks may not be as broadly traded as large- or mid-cap stocks, and a funds positions in securities of such companies may be substantial in relation to the market for such securities. Accordingly, it may be difficult for a fund to dispose of securities of these small-cap companies at prevailing market prices to meet redemptions. This lower degree of liquidity can adversely affect the value of these securities. For these reasons and others, the value of a funds investments in small-cap stocks is expected to be more volatile than other types of investments, including other types of stock investments. While small-cap stocks are generally considered to offer greater growth opportunities for investors, they involve greater risks and the share price of a fund that invests in small-cap stocks may change sharply during the short term and long term.
Stock Substitution Strategy is a strategy, whereby each fund may, in certain circumstances, substitute a similar stock for a security in its index. For example, a stock issued by a foreign corporation and included in a funds index may not be available for purchase by a fund because the fund does not reside in the foreign country in which the stock was issued. However, the foreign corporation may have issued a series of stock that is sold only to foreign investors such as a fund. In these cases, a fund may buy that issue as a substitute for the security included in its index. Each fund may invest up to 10% (20% in the case of Schwab Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF) of its assets in stocks that are designed to substitute for securities in its index.
U.S. Government Securities are issued by the U.S. Treasury or issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities. Not all U.S. government securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Some U.S. government securities, such as those issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (known as Fannie Mae), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (known as Freddie Mac), the Student Loan Marketing Association (known as Sallie Mae), and the Federal Home Loan Banks, are supported by a line of credit the issuing entity has with the U.S. Treasury. Others are supported solely by the credit of the issuing agency or instrumentality such as obligations issued by the Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation. There can be no assurance that the U.S. government will provide financial support to U.S. government securities of its agencies and instrumentalities if it is not obligated to do so under law. Of course U.S. government securities, including U.S. Treasury securities, are among the safest securities, however, not unlike other debt securities, they are still sensitive to interest rate changes, which will cause their yields and prices to fluctuate.
On September 7, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced a federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, placing the two federal instrumentalities in conservatorship. Under the takeover, the U.S. Treasury agreed to acquire $1 billion of senior preferred stock of each instrumentality and obtained warrants for the purchase of common stock of each instrumentality. Under these Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements (SPAs), the U.S. Treasury has pledged to provide up to $100 billion per instrumentality as needed, including the contribution of cash capital to the instrumentalities in the event their liabilities exceed their assets. On May 6, 2009, the U.S. Treasury increased its maximum commitment to each instrumentality under the SPAs to $200 billion per instrumentality. On December 24, 2009, the U.S. Treasury further amended the SPAs to allow the cap on Treasurys funding commitment to increase as necessary to accommodate any cumulative reduction in Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs net worth through the end of 2012. On August 17, 2012, the U.S. Treasury announced that it was again amending the SPA to terminate the requirement that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each pay a 10% dividend annually on all amounts received under the funding commitment. Instead, they will transfer to the U.S. Treasury on a quarterly basis all profits earned during a quarter that exceed a capital reserve amount of $3 billion. It is anticipated that the new amendment would put Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a better position to service their debt. At the start of 2013, the unlimited support the U.S. Treasury extended to the two companies expired Fannie Maes bailout is capped at $125 billion and Freddie Mac has a limit of $149 billion.
16
The actions of the U.S. Treasury are intended to ensure that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac maintain a positive net worth and meet their financial obligations preventing mandatory triggering of receivership. No assurance can be given that the U.S. Treasury initiatives will be successful.
On August 5, 2011, S&P lowered the long-term sovereign credit rating assigned to the United States to AA+ with a negative outlook. On August 8, 2011, S&P downgraded the long-term senior debt rating of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to AA+ with a negative outlook. The long-term impacts of any future downgrades are unknown. However, any future downgrades could have a material adverse impact on global financial markets and worldwide economic conditions, and could negatively impact a fund.
Non-Principal Investment Strategy Investments
The following investments may be used as part of each funds non-principal investment strategy:
Borrowing. A fund may borrow money from banks or through the Schwab Funds interfund borrowing and lending facility (as described below) for any purpose in an amount up to 1/3 of the funds total assets (not including temporary borrowings). A fund may borrow for temporary or emergency purposes; for example, a fund may borrow at times to meet redemption requests rather than sell portfolio securities to raise the necessary cash. Provisions of the 1940 Act, as amended, require the funds to maintain continuous asset coverage (that is, total assets including borrowings, less liabilities exclusive of borrowings) of 300% of the amount borrowed, with an exception for certain temporary or emergency borrowings not exceeding 5% of the funds total assets. If the 300% asset coverage should decline as a result of market fluctuations or other reasons, the funds may be required to sell some of its portfolio holdings within three days (not including Sundays and holidays) to reduce the debt and restore the 300% asset coverage, even though it may be disadvantageous from an investment standpoint to sell securities at that time.
A funds borrowings will be subject to interest costs. Borrowing can also involve leveraging when securities are purchased with the borrowed money. Leveraging creates interest expenses that can exceed the income from the assets purchased with the borrowed money. In addition, leveraging may magnify changes in the net asset value of a funds shares and in its portfolio yield. A fund will earmark or segregate assets to cover such borrowings in accordance with positions of the SEC. If assets used to secure a borrowing decrease in value, a fund may be required to pledge additional collateral to avoid liquidation of those assets.
A fund may establish lines-of-credit (lines) with certain banks by which it may borrow funds for temporary or emergency purposes. A borrowing is presumed to be for temporary or emergency purposes if it is repaid by a fund within 60 days and is not extended or renewed. A fund may use the lines to meet large or unexpected redemptions that would otherwise force a fund to liquidate securities under circumstances which are unfavorable to a funds remaining shareholders. A fund will pay a fee to the bank for using the lines.
These transactions involve a commitment to buy or sell specific securities at a predetermined price or yield, with payment and delivery taking place after the customary settlement period for that type of security. When purchasing securities on a delayed-delivery basis, a fund assumes the rights and risks of ownership, including the risk of price and yield fluctuations. Typically, no interest will accrue to a fund until the security is delivered. A fund will earmark or segregate appropriate liquid assets to cover its delayed-delivery purchase obligations. When a fund sells a security on a delayed-delivery basis, a fund does not participate in further gains or losses with respect to that security. If the other party to a delayed-delivery transaction fails to deliver or pay for the securities, a fund could suffer losses.
17
Foreign Currency Transactions (Non-principal investment of the Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF, the Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF and the Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF only). A fund may invest in foreign currency-denominated securities, may purchase and sell foreign currency options and foreign currency futures contracts and related options and may engage in foreign currency transactions on a spot (cash) basis at the rate prevailing in the currency exchange market at the time. A fund may engage in these transactions to protect against uncertainty in the level of future foreign exchange rates in the purchase and sale of securities. A fund may also use foreign currency options and futures to increase exposure to a foreign currency or to shift exposure to foreign currency fluctuations from one country to another.
Buying and selling foreign currency options and foreign currency futures contracts and related options involves costs and may result in losses. The ability of a fund to engage in these transactions may be limited by tax considerations. Although these techniques tend to minimize the risk of loss due to declines in the value of the hedged currency, they tend to limit any potential gain that might result from an increase in the value of such currency. Transactions in these contracts involve certain other risks. Unanticipated fluctuations in currency prices may result in a poorer overall performance for a fund than if it had not engaged in any such transactions. Moreover, there may be imperfect correlation between a funds holdings of securities denominated in a particular currency and the currency transactions into which a fund enters. Such imperfect correlation may cause a fund to sustain losses, which will prevent it from achieving a complete hedge or expose it to risk of foreign exchange loss.
Suitable hedging transactions may not be available in all circumstances and there can be no assurance that a fund will engage in such transactions at any given time or from time to time. Also, such transactions may not be successful and may eliminate any chance for a fund to benefit from favorable fluctuations in relevant foreign currencies.
A fund may buy or sell foreign currency options and foreign currency futures contracts and related options under the same circumstances, and such use is subject to the same risks and costs, as those set forth in the section Futures Contracts with respect to the funds use of forward foreign currency exchange contracts.
Illiquid Securities generally are any securities that cannot be disposed of promptly and in the ordinary course of business within seven days at approximately the amount at which a fund has valued the instruments. The liquidity of a funds investments is monitored under the supervision and direction of the Board of Trustees. Each fund may not invest more than 15% of its net assets in illiquid securities. In the event that a subsequent change in net assets or other circumstances cause a fund to exceed this limitation, the fund will take steps to bring the aggregate amount of illiquid instruments back within the limitations as soon as reasonably practicable.
In making liquidity determinations before purchasing a particular security, the Adviser considers a number of factors including, but not limited to: the nature and size of the security; the number of dealers that make a market in the security; and data which indicates that a securitys price has not changed for a period of a week or longer. After purchase, it is the Advisers policy to maintain awareness of developments in the marketplace that could cause a change in a securitys liquid or illiquid status. Investments currently not considered liquid include repurchase agreements not maturing within seven days and certain restricted securities.
Interfund Borrowing and Lending. A fund may borrow money from and/or lend money to other funds/portfolios in the Schwab complex, including traditional mutual funds/portfolios not discussed in this SAI or in the corresponding prospectus. All loans are for temporary or emergency purposes and the interest rates to be charged will be the average of the overnight repurchase agreement rate and the short term bank loan rate. All loans are subject to numerous conditions designed to ensure fair and equitable treatment of all participating funds/portfolios. These conditions include, for example, that a funds participation in the credit facility must be consistent with its investment policies and limitations and organizational documents; no fund may lend to another fund through the interfund lending facility if the loan would cause the aggregate outstanding loans through the credit facility to exceed 15% of the lending funds current net assets at the time of the loan; and that a funds interfund loans to any one fund shall not exceed 5% of the lending funds net assets. With respect to the funds discussed in this SAI, a fund lending to another fund may forego gains which could have been made had those assets been invested in securities of its applicable underlying index. The interfund lending facility is subject to the oversight and periodic review of the Board of Trustees.
18
Non-Publicly Traded Securities and Private Placements. A fund may receive in securities that are neither listed on a stock exchange nor traded over-the-counter, including privately placed securities. Such unlisted securities may involve a higher degree of business and financial risk that can result in substantial losses. As a result of the absence of a public trading market for these securities, they may be less liquid than publicly traded securities. Although these securities may be sold in privately negotiated transactions, the prices realized from these sales could be less than those originally paid by a fund or less than what may be considered the fair value of such securities. Furthermore, companies whose securities are not publicly traded may not be subject to the disclosure and other investor protection requirements which might be applicable if their securities were publicly traded. If such securities are required to be registered under the securities laws of one or more jurisdictions before being sold, a fund may be required to bear the expenses of registration. Though the funds do not intend to purchase these securities, they may receive such securities as a result of another transaction, such as the spin-off of a companys subsidiary to a separate entity.
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) are pooled investment vehicles, which invest primarily in income producing real estate or real estate related loans or interests and, in some cases, manage real estate. REITs are sometimes referred to as equity REITs, mortgage REITs or hybrid REITs. An equity REIT invests primarily in properties and generates income from rental and lease properties and, in some cases, from the management of real estate. Equity REITs also offer the potential for growth as a result of property appreciation and from the sale of appreciated property. Mortgage REITs invest primarily in real estate mortgages, which may secure construction, development or long term loans, and derive income for the collection of interest payments. Hybrid REITs may combine the features of equity REITs and mortgage REITs. REITs are generally organized as corporations or business trusts, but are not taxed as a corporation if they meet certain requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify, a REIT must, among other things, invest substantially all of its assets in interests in real estate (including other REITs), cash and government securities, distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to its shareholders and receive at least 75% of that income from rents, mortgages and sales of property.
Like any investment in real estate, a REITs performance depends on many factors, such as its ability to find tenants for its properties, to renew leases, and to finance property purchases and renovations. In general, REITs may be affected by changes in underlying real estate values, which may have an exaggerated effect to the extent a REIT concentrates its investment in certain regions or property types. For example, rental income could decline because of extended vacancies, increased competition from nearby properties, tenants failure to pay rent, or incompetent management. Property values could decrease because of overbuilding, environmental liabilities, uninsured damages caused by natural disasters, a general decline in the neighborhood, losses due to casualty or condemnation, increases in property taxes, or changes in zoning laws. Ultimately, a REITs performance depends on the types of properties it owns and how well the REIT manages its properties. Additionally, declines in the market value of a REIT may reflect not only depressed real estate prices, but may also reflect the degree of leverage utilized by the REIT.
In general, during periods of rising interest rates, REITs may lose some of their appeal for investors who may be able to obtain higher yields from other income-producing investments, such as long term bonds. Higher interest rates also mean that financing for property purchases and improvements is more costly and difficult to obtain. During periods of declining interest rates, certain mortgage REITs may hold mortgages that mortgagors elect to prepay, which can reduce the yield on securities issued by mortgage REITs. Mortgage REITs may be affected by the ability of borrowers to repay debts to the REIT when due and equity REITs may be affected by the ability of tenants to pay rent.
Like small-cap stocks in general, certain REITs have relatively small market capitalizations and their securities can be more volatile thanand at times will perform differently fromlarge-cap stocks. In addition, because small-cap stocks are typically less liquid than large-cap stocks, REIT stocks may sometimes experience greater share-price fluctuations than the stocks of larger companies. Further, REITs are dependent upon specialized management skills, have limited diversification, and are therefore subject to risks inherent in operating and financing a limited number of projects. By investing in REITs indirectly through a fund, a shareholder will bear indirectly a proportionate share of the REITs expenses in addition to their proportionate share of a funds expenses. Finally, REITs could possibly fail to qualify for tax-free pass-through of income under the Internal Revenue Code or to maintain their exemptions from registration under the 1940 Act.
19
Repurchase Agreements are instruments under which a buyer acquires ownership of certain securities (usually U.S. government securities) from a seller who agrees to repurchase the securities at a mutually agreed-upon time and price, thereby determining the yield during the buyers holding period. Any repurchase agreements a fund enters into will involve a fund as the buyer and banks or broker-dealers as sellers. The period of repurchase agreements is usually short from overnight to one week, although the securities collateralizing a repurchase agreement may have longer maturity dates. Default by the seller might cause a fund to experience a loss or delay in the liquidation of the collateral securing the repurchase agreement. A fund also may incur disposition costs in liquidating the collateral. In the event of a bankruptcy or other default of a repurchase agreements seller, a fund might incur expenses in enforcing its rights, and could experience losses, including a decline in the value of the underlying securities and loss of income. A fund will make payment under a repurchase agreement only upon physical delivery or evidence of book entry transfer of the collateral to the account of its custodian bank. Repurchase agreements are the economic equivalents of loans.
Restricted Securities are securities that are subject to legal restrictions on their sale. Difficulty in selling restricted securities may result in a loss or be costly to a fund. Restricted securities generally can be sold in privately negotiated transactions, pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), or in a registered public offering. Where registration is required, the holder of a registered security may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expense and a considerable period may elapse between the time it decides to seek registration and the time it may be permitted to sell a security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, the holder might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it decided to seek registration of the security. Certain restricted securities, such as 4(2) commercial paper and Rule 144A securities, may be considered to be liquid if they meet the criteria for liquidity established by the Board. To the extent the fund invests in restricted securities that are deemed liquid, the general level of illiquidity in the funds portfolio may be increased if such securities become illiquid.
Investment Limitations
The investment limitations below may be changed only by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the applicable fund. Under the 1940 Act, a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of a fund means the affirmative vote of the lesser of (1) more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the fund or (2) 67% or more of the shares present at a shareholders meeting if more than 50% of the outstanding shares are represented at the meeting in person or by proxy.
EACH FUND MAY NOT:
1) | Purchase securities of an issuer, except as consistent with the maintenance of its status as an open-end diversified company under the 1940 Act, the rules or regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time. |
2) | Concentrate investments in a particular industry or group of industries, as concentration is defined under the 1940 Act, the rules or regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time, except that each fund will concentrate to approximately the same extent that its benchmark index concentrates in the securities of such particular industry or group of industries. |
3) | Purchase or sell commodities, commodities contracts or real estate, lend or borrow money, issue senior securities, underwrite securities issued by others, or pledge, mortgage or hypothecate any of its assets, except as permitted by (or not prohibited by) the 1940 Act or the rules or regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time. |
20
THE FOLLOWING DESCRIPTIONS OF THE 1940 ACT MAY ASSIST INVESTORS IN UNDERSTANDING THE ABOVE POLICIES AND RESTRICTIONS.
BORROWING. The 1940 Act restricts an investment company from borrowing (including pledging, mortgaging or hypothecating assets) in excess of 33 1/3% of its total assets (not including temporary borrowings not in excess of 5% of its total assets). Transactions that are fully collateralized in a manner that does not involve the prohibited issuance of a senior security within the meaning of Section 18(f) of the 1940 Act, shall not be regarded as borrowings for the purposes of a funds investment restriction.
CONCENTRATION. The SEC has defined concentration as investing 25% or more of an investment companys total assets in an industry or group of industries, with certain exceptions such as with respect to investments in obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies and instrumentalities, or tax-exempt obligations of state or municipal governments and their political subdivisions.
DIVERSIFICATION. Under the 1940 Act and the rules, regulations and interpretations thereunder, a diversified company, as to 75% of its total assets, may not purchase securities of any issuer (other than obligations of, or guaranteed by, the U.S. government or its agencies, or instrumentalities or securities of other investment companies) if, as a result, more than 5% of its total assets would be invested in the securities of such issuer, or more than 10% of the issuers voting securities would be held by a fund.
LENDING. Under the 1940 Act, an investment company may only make loans if expressly permitted by its investment policies.
REAL ESTATE. The 1940 Act does not directly restrict an investment companys ability to invest in real estate, but does require that every investment company have the fundamental investment policy governing such investments. Each fund has adopted the fundamental policy that would permit direct investment in real estate. However, each fund has a non-fundamental investment limitation that prohibits it from investing directly in real estate. This non-fundamental policy may be changed only by vote of a funds Board of Trustees.
SENIOR SECURITIES. Senior securities may include any obligation or instrument issued by an investment company evidencing indebtedness. The 1940 Act generally prohibits a fund from issuing senior securities, although it provides allowances for certain borrowings and certain other investments, such as short sales, reverse repurchase agreements, and firm commitment agreements, when such investments are covered or with appropriate earmarking or segregation of assets to cover such obligations.
UNDERWRITING. Under the 1940 Act, underwriting securities involves an investment company purchasing securities directly from an issuer for the purpose of selling (distributing) them or participating in any such activity either directly or indirectly. Under the 1940 Act, a diversified fund may not make any commitment as underwriter, if immediately thereafter the amount of its outstanding underwriting commitments, plus the value of its investments in securities of issuers (other than investment companies) of which it owns more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities, exceeds 25% of the value of its total assets.
THE FOLLOWING ARE NON-FUNDAMENTAL INVESTMENT POLICIES AND RESTRICTIONS, AND MAY BE CHANGED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES.
EACH FUND MAY NOT:
1) | Invest more than 15% of its net assets in illiquid securities. |
21
2) | Sell securities short unless it owns the security or the right to obtain the security or equivalent securities, or unless it covers such short sale as required by current SEC rules and interpretations (transactions in futures contracts, options and other derivative instruments are not considered selling securities short). |
3) | Purchase securities on margin, except such short term credits as may be necessary for the clearance of purchases and sales of securities and provided that margin deposits in connection with futures contracts, options on futures or other derivative instruments shall not constitute purchasing securities on margin. |
4) | Borrow money except that each fund may (i) borrow money from banks or through an interfund lending facility, if any, and engage in reverse repurchase agreements with any party provided that such borrowings and reverse repurchase agreements in combination do not exceed 33 1/3% of its total assets, including the amount borrowed (but not including temporary or emergency borrowings not exceeding 5%); and (ii) may borrow an additional amount up to 5% of its assets for temporary or emergency purposes. |
5) | Lend any security or make any other loan if, as a result, more than 33 1/3% of its total assets would be lent to other parties (this restriction does not apply to purchases of debt securities or repurchase agreements). |
6) | Purchase securities (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities) if, as a result of such purchase, 25% or more of the value of its total assets would be invested in any industry or group of industries. |
7) | Purchase or sell commodities, commodity contracts or real estate, including interests in real estate limited partnerships, provided that the fund may (i) purchase securities of companies that deal in real estate or interests therein (including REITs); (ii) purchase securities of companies that deal in precious metals or interests therein; and (iii) purchase, sell and enter into futures contracts (including futures contracts on indices of securities, interest rates and currencies), options on futures contracts (including futures contracts on indices of securities, interest rates and currencies), warrants, swaps, forward contracts, foreign currency spot and forward contracts or other derivative instruments. |
Policies and investment limitations that state a maximum percentage of assets that may be invested in a security or other asset, or that set forth a quality standard shall be measured immediately after and as a result of a funds acquisition of such security or asset, unless otherwise noted. Except with respect to limitations on borrowing and futures and option contracts, any subsequent change in net assets or other circumstances does not require a fund to sell an investment if it could not then make the same investment. With respect to the limitation on illiquid securities, in the event that a subsequent change in net assets or other circumstances cause a fund to exceed its limitation, a fund will take steps to bring the aggregate amount of illiquid instruments back within the limitations as soon as reasonably practicable.
The funds offer and issue shares at their net asset value per share or NAV only in aggregations of a specified number of shares (Creation Units). The method by which Creation Units are created and trade may raise certain issues under applicable securities laws. Because new Creation Units are issued and sold by the funds on an ongoing basis, at any point a distribution, as such term is used in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), may occur. Broker-dealers and other persons are cautioned that some activities on their part may, depending on the circumstances, result in their being deemed participants in a distribution in a manner that could render them statutory underwriters and subject them to the prospectus delivery requirement and liability provisions of the Securities Act.
For example, a broker-dealer firm or its client may be deemed a statutory underwriter if it takes Creation Units after placing an order with the funds distributor, breaks them down into constituent shares, and sells such shares directly to customers, or if it chooses to couple the creation of a supply of new shares with an active selling effort involving solicitation of secondary market demand for shares. A determination of whether one is an underwriter for purposes of the Securities Act must take into account all the facts and circumstances pertaining to the activities of the broker-dealer or its client in the particular case, and the examples mentioned above should not be considered a complete description of all the activities that could lead to categorization as an underwriter.
22
Broker-dealer firms should also note that dealers who are not underwriters but are effecting transactions in shares, whether or not participating in the distribution of shares, generally are required to deliver a prospectus. This is because the prospectus delivery exemption in Section 4(3) of the Securities Act is not available in respect of such transactions as a result of Section 24(d) of the 1940 Act. Firms that incur a prospectus delivery obligation with respect to shares of the fund are reminded that, pursuant to Rule 153 under the Securities Act, a prospectus delivery obligation under Section 5(b)(2) of the Securities Act owed to an exchange member in connection with the sale on an exchange is satisfied by the fact that the prospectus is available at the exchange upon request. The prospectus delivery mechanism provided in Rule 153 is only available with respect to transactions on an exchange.
The funds are overseen by a Board of Trustees. The Trustees are responsible for protecting shareholder interests. The Trustees regularly meet to review the investment activities, contractual arrangements and the investment performance of the funds. The funds are new, and therefore, the Trustees did not meet with respect to the funds.
Certain Trustees are interested persons. A Trustee is considered an interested person of the Trust under the 1940 Act if he or she is an officer, director, or an employee of CSIM or Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (Schwab). A Trustee also may be considered an interested person of the Trust under the 1940 Act if he or she owns stock of The Charles Schwab Corporation, a publicly traded company and the parent company of CSIM.
As used herein the terms Fund Complex and Family of Investment Companies each refer collectively to The Charles Schwab Family of Funds, Schwab Investments, Schwab Annuity Portfolios, Schwab Capital Trust, Schwab Strategic Trust, Laudus Trust, and Laudus Institutional Trust which, as of August 8, 2013, included 99 funds.
The tables below provide information about the Trustees and officers for the Trust, which includes the funds, in this SAI. The address of each individual listed below is 211 Main Street, San Francisco, California 94105.
NAME, YEAR OF BIRTH, AND
(TERM OF OFFICE AND
|
PRINCIPAL
OCCUPATIONS DURING
|
NUMBER OF
PORTFOLIOS IN FUND COMPLEX OVERSEEN BY THE TRUSTEE |
OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS
|
|||
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES | ||||||
Robert W. Burns 1959 Trustee (Trustee since 2009) |
Retired/Private Investor (January 2009 present); Consulting Managing Director (March 2003 December 2008), PIMCO (investment adviser). | 23 |
Director, PS Business Parks, Inc. (2005 2012).
Trustee, PIMCO Funds (investment company consisting of 84 portfolios) (1997 2008).
Trustee, PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust (investment company consisting of 16 portfolios) (1997 2008).
Director and Chairman, PIMCO Strategic Global Government Fund (investment company consisting of one portfolio) (2006 2008).
Director, PCM Fund, Inc. (investment company consisting of one portfolio) (1997 2008). |
23
NAME, YEAR OF BIRTH, AND
(TERM OF OFFICE AND
|
PRINCIPAL
OCCUPATIONS DURING
|
NUMBER OF
PORTFOLIOS IN FUND COMPLEX OVERSEEN BY THE TRUSTEE |
OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS
|
|||
Stephen Timothy Kochis 1946 Trustee (Trustee since 2012) |
CEO and Owner, Kochis Global (wealth management consulting) (May 2012 present); Chairman and CEO, Aspiriant, LLC (wealth management) (January 2008 April 2012). | 23 | None | |||
Charles A. Ruffel 1956 Trustee (Trustee since 2009) |
Advisor (January 2008 present) and Chief Executive Officer (January 1998 January 2008), Asset International, Inc. (publisher of financial services information); Managing Partner and CoFounder, Kudu Advisors, LLC (financial services) (June 2008 present). |
23 | None | |||
INTERESTED TRUSTEE | ||||||
Walter W. Bettinger II 2 1960 Chairman and Trustee (Chairman and Trustee since 2009) |
As of October 2008, President and Chief Executive Officer, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. and The Charles Schwab Corporation. Since October 2008, Director, The Charles Schwab Corporation. Since May 2008, Director, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. and Schwab Holdings, Inc. Since 2006, Director, Charles Schwab Bank. Until October 2008, President and Chief Operating Officer, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. and The Charles Schwab Corporation. From 2004 through 2007, Executive Vice President and President, Schwab Investor Services. From 2004 through 2005, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Individual Investor Enterprise, and from 2002 through 2004, Executive Vice President, Corporate Services. | 99 | None. |
24
NAME, YEAR OF BIRTH, AND
POSITION(S) WITH THE TRUST;
(TERM OF OFFICE AND LENGTH OF TIME SERVED 3 ) |
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATIONS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS |
|
OFFICERS | ||
Marie Chandoha 1961 President and Chief Executive Officer (Officer since 2010) |
Executive Vice President, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (Sept. 2010 present); Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (Dec. 2010 present), Chief Investment Officer (Sept. 2010 Oct. 2011), Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.; President, Chief Executive Officer (Dec. 2010 present), and Chief Investment Officer (Sept. 2010 Oct. 2011), Schwab Funds, Laudus Funds and Schwab ETFs; Global Head of Fixed Income Business Division, BlackRock, Inc. (formerly Barclays Global Investors) (March 2007 August 2010). | |
George Pereira 1964 Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer (Officer since 2009) |
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Nov. 2004 present), Chief Operating Officer (Jan. 2011 present), Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.; Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, Laudus Funds (2006 present); Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer, Schwab Funds (Nov. 2004 present) and Schwab ETFs (Oct. 2009 present); Director, Charles Schwab Worldwide Fund, PLC and Charles Schwab Asset Management (Ireland) Limited (April 2005 present). |
|
Omar Aguilar 1970 Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer Equities (Officer since 2011) |
Senior Vice President and Chief Investment OfficerEquities, Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. (April 2011 present); Senior Vice President and Chief Investment OfficerEquities, Schwab Funds and Laudus Funds (June 2011 present); Head of the Portfolio Management Group and Vice President of Portfolio Management, Financial Engines, Inc. (May 2009 April 2011); Head of Quantitative Equity, ING Investment Management (July 2004 Jan. 2009). | |
Brett Wander 1961 Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer Fixed Income (Officer since 2011) |
Senior Vice President and Chief Investment OfficerFixed Income, Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. (April 2011 present); Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer Fixed Income, Schwab Funds and Laudus Funds (June 2011 present); Senior Managing Director, Global Head of Active Fixed-Income Strategies, State Street Global Advisors (Jan. 2008 Oct. 2010); Director of Alpha Strategies Loomis, Sayles & Company (April 2006 Jan. 2008). |
25
David Lekich 1964 Chief Legal Officer and Secretary (Officer since 2011) |
Senior Vice President, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (Sept. 2011 present); Senior Vice President and Chief Counsel, Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. (Sept. 2011 present); Vice President, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (March 2004 Sept. 2011) and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. (Jan. 2011 Sept. 2011); Secretary (April 2011 present) and Chief Legal Officer (Dec. 2011 present), Schwab Funds (April 2011 present); Vice President and Assistant Clerk, Laudus Funds (April 2011 present); Secretary (May 2011 present) and Chief Legal Officer (Nov. 2011 present), Schwab ETFs. | |
Catherine MacGregor 1964 Vice President and Assistant Secretary (Officer since 2009) |
Vice President, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. (July 2005-present); Vice President (Dec. 2005-present), Chief Legal Officer and Clerk (March 2007-present), Laudus Funds; Vice President (Nov. 2005 present) and Assistant Secretary (June 2007 present), Schwab Funds; Vice President and Assistant Secretary, Schwab ETFs (Oct. 2009-present). |
1 |
Each Trustee shall hold office until the election and qualification of his or her successor, or until he or she dies, resigns or is removed. The Trusts retirement policy requires that independent trustees retire by December 31 of the year in which the Trustee turns 72 or the Trustees twentieth year of service as an independent trustee, whichever comes first. |
2 |
Mr. Bettinger is an Interested Trustee because he owns stock of The Charles Schwab Corporation, the parent company of the investment adviser. |
3 |
The President, Treasurer and Secretary hold office until their respective successors are chosen and qualified or until he or she sooner dies, resigns, is removed or becomes disqualified. Each of the other officers serves at the pleasure of the Boards. |
Board of Trustees Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight
The Board of Trustees of the Trust is responsible for oversight of the management of the funds, which includes oversight of service providers to the funds, such as the funds investment adviser. The Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Walter W. Bettinger, II, is Chief Executive Officer of The Charles Schwab Corporation and an interested person of the Trust as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. The Trust does not have a single lead independent Trustee. The Board of Trustees is comprised of a super-majority (75 percent) of Trustees who are not interested persons of the Trust (i.e., Independent Trustees). There is an Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Trustees that is chaired by an Independent Trustee and comprised solely of Independent Trustees. The Audit and Compliance Committee chair presides at Committee meetings, participates in formulating agendas for those meetings, and coordinates with management to serve as a liaison between the Independent Trustees and management on matters within the scope of the responsibilities of the Committee as set forth in its Board of Trustees-approved charter. The Trust has determined that this leadership structure is appropriate given the specific characteristics and circumstances of the Trust. The Trust made this determination in consideration of, among other things, the fact that the Independent Trustees of the Trust constitute a super-majority of the Board of Trustees, the number of funds overseen by the Board of Trustees, and the total number of Trustees on the Board of Trustees.
Like most mutual funds, fund management and its other service providers have responsibility for day-to-day risk management for the funds. The Board of Trustees, as part of its overall oversight responsibilities for Trust operations, oversees the risk management efforts of fund management and service providers with respect to the funds. The Board of Trustees role in the risk oversight of the Trust, fund management and the funds service providers consists of monitoring risks identified during regular and special reports to the Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Trustees, as well as regular and special reports to the full Board of Trustees. In addition to monitoring such risks, the Audit and Compliance Committee and the Board of Trustees oversee efforts by management and service providers to manage risks to which the funds of the Trust may be exposed. For example, the Audit and
26
Compliance Committee meets with the funds Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Financial Officer and receives regular reports regarding compliance risks, operational risks and risks related to the valuation and liquidity of portfolio securities. The full Board of Trustees meets with portfolio managers and other members of management and receives reports regarding investment risks of the portfolios and risks related to distribution of the funds shares. From their review of these reports and discussions with management, the Committee and Board of Trustees receive information about the material risks of the funds of the Trust and about how management and service providers mitigate those risks.
The Board of Trustees recognizes that not all risks that may affect the funds can be identified nor can processes and controls be developed to eliminate or mitigate the occurrence or effects of certain risks; some risks are simply beyond the reasonable control of the funds, their management, and their service providers. Although the risk oversight functions of the Board of Trustees, and the risk management policies of fund management and fund service providers, are designed to be effective, there is no guarantee that they will eliminate or mitigate all risks. In addition, it may be necessary to bear certain risks (such as investment-related risks) to achieve each funds investment objective. As a result of the foregoing and other factors, the funds ability to manage risk is subject to significant limitations.
Individual Trustee Qualifications
The Board of Trustees has concluded that each of the Trustees should initially and continue to serve on the Board of Trustees because of (i) their ability to review and understand information about the funds provided to them by management, to identify and request other information they may deem relevant to the performance of their duties, to question management regarding material factors bearing on the management of the funds, and to exercise their business judgment in a manner that serves the best interests of the funds shareholders and (ii) the Trustees experience, qualifications, attributes and skills as described below.
The Board of Trustees has concluded that Mr. Bettinger should serve as Trustee of the funds because of the experience he has gained as president and chief executive officer of The Charles Schwab Corporation, his knowledge of and experience in the financial services industry, and the experience he has gained serving as Trustee of the Schwab Strategic Trust funds since 2009 and of the Schwab Funds since 2008.
The Board of Trustees has concluded that Mr. Burns should serve as Trustee of the funds because of the experience he gained serving as a former managing director of a mutual fund management company and former president and trustee of certain mutual funds managed by that company, his experience in and knowledge of the financial services industry, and the experience he has gained serving as Trustee of the Schwab Strategic Trust funds since 2009.
The Board of Trustees has concluded that Mr. Kochis should serve as a Trustee of the funds because of the experience he gained as CEO and chairman of his own wealth management and investment planning services firm and his experience in and knowledge of the financial services industry.
The Board of Trustees has concluded that Mr. Ruffel should serve as Trustee of the funds because of the experience he gained as the founder and former chief executive officer of a publisher and information services firm specializing in the retirement plan industry, his experience in and knowledge of the financial services industry, and the experience he has gained serving as Trustee of the Schwab Strategic Trust funds since 2009.
In its periodic assessment of the effectiveness of the Board of Trustees, the Board of Trustees considers the complementary individual skills and experience of the individual Trustees primarily in the broader context of the Board of Trusteess overall composition so that the Board of Trustees, as a body, possesses the appropriate (and appropriately diverse) skills and experience to oversee the business of the funds. Moreover, references to the qualifications, attributes and skills of Trustees are pursuant to requirements of the SEC, do not constitute holding out of the Board of Trustees or any Trustee as having any special expertise or experience, and shall not be deemed to impose any greater responsibility or liability on any such person or on the Board of Trustees by reason thereof.
27
Trustee Committees
The Board of Trustees has established certain committees and adopted Committee charters with respect to those committees, each as described below.
The Trust has a standing Audit and Compliance Committee. The function of the Audit and Compliance Committee is to provide oversight responsibility for the integrity of the Trusts financial reporting processes and compliance policies, procedures and processes, and for the Trusts overall system of internal controls. This Committee is comprised of all of the Independent Trustees. The charter directs that the Audit and Compliance Committee must meet 4 times annually, with additional meetings as the Audit and Compliance Committee deems appropriate. The funds are new, and therefore, the Committee did not meet with respect to the funds.
The Trust also has a Nominating Committee that is composed of all the Independent Trustees, which meets as often as deemed appropriate by the Nominating Committee for the primary purpose of selecting and nominating candidates to serve as members of the Board of Trustees. The Nominating Committee does not have a policy with respect to consideration of candidates for Trustee submitted by shareholders. However, if the Nominating Committee determined that it would be in the best interests of the trust to fill a vacancy on the Board of Trustees, and a shareholder submitted a candidate for consideration by the Board of Trustees to fill the vacancy, the Nominating Committee would evaluate that candidate in the same manner as it evaluates nominees identified by the Nominating Committee. Nominee recommendations may be submitted to the Secretary of the Trust at the Trusts principal business address. The charter directs that the Nominating Committee meet at such times and with such frequency as is deemed necessary or appropriate by the Nominating Committee. The funds are new, and therefore, the Committee did not meet with respect to the funds.
Trustee Compensation
Name of Trustee |
Aggregate Compensation from the funds in this SAI*: |
Pension or Retirement
|
Total Compensation from the Fund Complex**: |
|||||||||
INTERESTED TRUSTEES |
||||||||||||
Walter W. Bettinger II |
$ | 0 | N/A | $ | 0 | |||||||
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES |
||||||||||||
Robert W. Burns |
$ | 1,476.33 | N/A | $ | 57,000 | |||||||
Mark A. Goldfarb 1 |
N/A | N/A | $ | 35,382 | ||||||||
Stephen T. Kochis 2 |
$ | 1,476.33 | N/A | $ | 21,618 | |||||||
Charles A. Ruffel |
$ | 1,476.33 | N/A | $ | 57,000 |
* | Estimated aggregate compensation from the funds for the period of August 15, 2013 (the funds commencement of operations) to the fiscal year ending February 28, 2014. |
** | Actual total compensation from the fund complex for the fiscal year ending February 28, 2013. |
1 |
Mr. Goldfarb resigned as a Trustee of the Trust effective November 13, 2012. |
2 |
Mr. Kochis began serving as a Trustee of the Trust effective November 14, 2012. |
28
Securities Beneficially Owned By Each Trustee
The following table provides each Trustees equity ownership of the funds and ownership of all registered investment companies overseen by each Trustee in the Family of Investment Companies as of December 31, 2012.
Dollar Range of Trustee Ownership
of Equity Securities in the fund |
||||||||||||||
Name of Trustee |
Schwab
Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF |
Schwab
Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF |
Schwab
Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF |
Schwab
Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF |
Schwab
Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF |
Schwab
Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF |
Aggregate
Dollar Range of Trustee Ownership in the Family of Investment Companies |
|||||||
Interested Trustee |
||||||||||||||
Walter W. Bettinger II |
None | None | None | None | None | None | Over $100,000 | |||||||
Independent Trustees |
||||||||||||||
Robert W. Burns |
None | None | None | None | None | None | Over $100,000 | |||||||
Stephen T. Kochis 1 |
None | None | None | None | None | None | None | |||||||
Charles A. Ruffel |
None | None | None | None | None | None | None |
1 |
Mr. Kochis began serving as a Trustee of the Trust effective November 14, 2012. |
Code of Ethics
The funds, the investment adviser and the distributor have adopted Codes of Ethics as required under the 1940 Act. Subject to certain conditions or restrictions, the Codes of Ethics permit the Trustees, directors, officers or advisory representatives of the funds or the investment adviser or the directors or officers of the distributor to buy or sell directly or indirectly securities for their own accounts. This includes securities that may be purchased or held by the funds. Securities transactions by some of these individuals may be subject to prior approval of each entitys Chief Compliance Officer or alternate. Most securities transactions are subject to quarterly reporting and review requirements.
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES
As of August 8, 2013, the officers and Trustees of the Trust, as a group owned, of record or beneficially, less than 1% of the outstanding voting securities of the funds.
As of August 8, 2013, no persons or entities owned, of record or beneficially, more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the funds.
Persons who owned of record or beneficially more than 25% of a funds outstanding shares may be deemed to control the fund within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Shareholders controlling the fund could have the ability to vote a majority of the shares of the fund on any matter requiring the approval of shareholders of the fund.
29
Investment Adviser
CSIM, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Charles Schwab Corporation, 211 Main Street, San Francisco, California 94105, serves as the funds investment adviser pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement (Advisory Agreement) between it and the Trust. Charles R. Schwab is the founder, Chairman and Director of the Charles Schwab Corporation. As a result of his ownership and interests in The Charles Schwab Corporation, Mr. Schwab may be deemed to be a controlling person of CSIM.
Advisory Agreement
A funds Advisory Agreement must be specifically approved initially for a 2 year term, and after the expiration of the 2 year term, at least annually thereafter (1) by the vote of the Trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of the fund, and (2) by the vote of a majority of the Trustees who are not parties to the Advisory Agreement or interested persons of any party (the Independent Trustees), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
Each year, the Board of Trustees will call and hold a meeting to decide whether to renew the Advisory Agreement between the Trust and CSIM with respect to any existing funds in the Trust. In preparation for the meeting, the Board of Trustees requests and reviews a wide variety of materials provided by the funds investment adviser, as well as extensive data provided by third parties.
As described below, the investment adviser is entitled to receive a fee from the funds, payable monthly, for its advisory and administrative services to the funds. As compensation for these services, the firm receives a management fee from the funds expressed as a percentage of each funds average daily net assets.
FUND |
FEE | |||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF |
0.32 | % | ||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF |
0.32 | % | ||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF |
0.32 | % | ||
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF |
0.32 | % | ||
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF |
0.46 | % | ||
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF |
0.46 | % |
Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Adviser is responsible for substantially all expenses of the funds, including the cost of transfer agency, custody, fund administration, legal, audit and other services, but excluding interest expense and taxes, brokerage expenses and extraordinary or non-routine expenses.
Distributor
SEI Investments Distribution Co. (the Distributor), 1 Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456, is the principal underwriter and distributor of shares of the funds. The Distributor has entered into an agreement with the Trust pursuant to which it distributes shares of the funds (the Distribution Agreement). The Distributor continually distributes shares of the funds on a best effort basis. The Distributor has no obligation to sell any specific quantity of fund shares. The Distribution Agreement will continue for two years from its effective date and is renewable annually thereafter in accordance with the 1940 Act. Shares are continuously offered for sale by the funds through the Distributor only in Creation Units, as described in the funds prospectus. Shares in less than Creation Units are not distributed by the Distributor. The Distributor is a broker-dealer registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the 1934 Act) and a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. The Distributor is not affiliated with the Trust, CSIM, or any stock exchange.
30
The Distribution Agreement provides that it may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, on at least sixty (60) days prior written notice to the other party. The Distribution Agreement will terminate automatically in the event of its assignment (as defined in the 1940 Act).
Transfer Agent
State Street Bank and Trust Company, One Lincoln Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, serves as the funds transfer agent. As part of these services, the firm maintains records pertaining to the sale, redemption and transfer of the funds shares.
Custodian and Fund Accountant
State Street Bank and Trust Company, One Lincoln Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, serves as custodian and accountant for the funds.
The custodian is responsible for the daily safekeeping of securities and cash held or sold by the funds. The funds accountant maintains all books and records related to the funds transactions.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The funds independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterCoopers LLP (PwC), Three Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, California 9411-4004 audits and reports on the annual financial statements of the funds and reviews certain regulatory reports and the funds federal income tax return. PwC also performs other professional, accounting, auditing, tax and advisory services when engaged to do so by the Trust.
Other Accounts . In addition to the funds, each portfolio manager (collectively referred to as the Portfolio Managers) is responsible for the day-to-day management of certain other accounts, as listed below. The accounts listed below are not subject to a performance-based advisory fee. The information below is provided as of July 31, 2013.
Registered
Investment
Companies (this amount does not include the funds in this SAI) |
Other
Pooled
Investment Vehicles |
Other Accounts | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Number of
Accounts |
Total Assets |
Number of
Accounts |
Total
Assets |
Number of
Accounts |
Total Assets | ||||||||||||||||||
Agnes Hong |
22 | $ | 45,635,851,919 | 0 | $ | 0 | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Chuck Craig |
11 | $ | 11,810,568,531 | 0 | $ | 0 | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Jane Qin |
0 | $ | 0 | 0 | $ | 0 | 0 | $ | 0 |
Conflicts of Interest . A Portfolio Managers management of other accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest in connection with its management of the funds investments, on the one hand, and the investments of the other accounts, on the other. These other accounts include separate accounts and other mutual funds and ETFs advised by CSIM (collectively, the Other Managed Accounts). The Other Managed Accounts might have similar investment objectives as the funds, track the same index the funds track or otherwise hold, purchase, or sell securities that are eligible to be held, purchased, or sold by the funds. While the Portfolio Managers management of Other Managed Accounts may give rise to the potential conflicts of interest listed below, CSIM does not believe that the conflicts, if any, are material or, to the extent any such conflicts are material, CSIM believes it has adopted policies and procedures that are designed to manage those conflicts in an appropriate way.
31
Knowledge of the Timing and Size of Fund Trades . A potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of the Portfolio Managers day-to-day management of the funds. Because of their position with the funds, the Portfolio Managers know the size, timing, and possible market impact of fund trades. It is theoretically possible that the Portfolio Managers could use this information to the advantage of the Other Managed Accounts they manage and to the possible detriment of the funds. However, CSIM has adopted policies and procedures reasonably designed to allocate investment opportunities on a fair and equitable basis over time. Moreover, with respect to an index fund, which seeks to track its benchmark index, much of this information is publicly available. When it is determined to be in the best interest of both accounts, the Portfolio Managers may aggregate trade orders for the Other Managed Accounts, excluding Schwab Personal Portfolio Managed Accounts, with those of the funds. All aggregated orders are subject to CSIMs aggregation and allocation policy and procedures, which provide, among other things, that (i) a Portfolio Manager will not aggregate orders unless he or she believes such aggregation is consistent with his or her duty to seek best execution; (ii) no account will be favored over any other account; (iii) each account that participates in an aggregated order will participate at the average security price with all transaction costs shared on a pro-rata basis; and (iv) if the aggregated order cannot be executed in full, the partial execution is allocated pro-rata among the participating accounts in accordance with the size of each accounts order.
Investment Opportunities . A potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of each Portfolio Managers management of the funds and Other Managed Accounts which, in theory, may allow them to allocate investment opportunities in a way that favors the Other Managed Accounts over the funds, which conflict of interest may be exacerbated to the extent that CSIM or the Portfolio Manager receives, or expect to receive, greater compensation from their management of the Other Managed Accounts than the funds. Notwithstanding this theoretical conflict of interest, it is CSIMs policy to manage each account based on its investment objectives and related restrictions and, as discussed above, CSIM has adopted policies and procedures reasonably designed to allocate investment opportunities on a fair and equitable basis over time and in a manner consistent with each accounts investment objectives and related restrictions. For example, while the Portfolio Managers may buy for an Other Managed Account securities that differ in identity or quantity from securities bought for a fund or refrain from purchasing securities for an Other Managed Account that they are otherwise buying for a fund in an effort to outperform its specific benchmark, such an approach might not be suitable for the fund given its investment objectives and related restrictions.
Compensation . During the most recent fiscal year, each Portfolio Managers compensation consists of a fixed annual (base) salary and a discretionary bonus. The base salary is determined considering compensation payable for a similar position across the investment management industry and an evaluation of the individual Portfolio Managers overall performance such as the Portfolio Managers contribution to the investment process, good corporate citizenship, risk management and mitigation, and functioning as an active contributor to the firms success. The discretionary bonus is determined in accordance with the CSIM Equity and Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Incentive Plan (the Plan) as follows:
There are two independent funding components for the Plan:
|
75% of the funding is based on equal weighting of Investment Fund Performance and Risk Management and Mitigation |
|
25% of the funding is based on Corporate results |
32
Investment Fund Performance and Risk Management and Mitigation (75% weight)
Investment Fund Performance :
At the close of the year, each funds performance will be determined by its 1-year, 1 and 2-year, or 1 and 3-year percentile standing (based on pre-tax return before expenses) within its designated benchmark, peer group, or category, depending on the strategy of the fund (i.e., whether the fund is passively or actively managed) using standard statistical methods approved by CSIM senior management. Investment Fund Performance measurements may be changed or modified at the discretion of the CSIM President and CSIM Chief Operating Officer. As each participant may manage and/or support a number of funds, there may be several funds considered in arriving at the incentive compensation funding.
Risk Management and Mitigation :
Risk Management and Mitigation will be rated by CSIMs Chief Investment Officer, CSIMs Head of Investment Risk, CSIMs Chief Legal Officer, CSIMs Chief Compliance Officer and CSIMs Head of Operations Risk (or individuals with comparable responsibilities). Factors they will consider will include, but are not limited to:
|
Balancing safety of fund principal with appropriate limits that provide investment flexibility given existing market conditions |
|
Making timely sell recommendations to avoid significant deterioration of value resulting from the weakening condition of the issuer |
|
Escalating operating events and errors for prompt resolution |
|
Identifying largest risks and actively discussing with management |
|
Accurately validating fund information disseminated to the public (e.g., Annual and Semi-Annual reports, fund fact sheets, fund prospectus) |
|
Executing transactions timely and without material trade errors that result in losses to the funds |
|
Ensuring ongoing compliance with prospectus and investment policy guidelines |
|
Minimizing fund compliance exceptions |
|
Actively following up and resolving compliance exceptions |
Corporate Performance (25% weight)
The Corporate Bonus Plan is an annual bonus plan that provides discretionary awards based on the financial performance of The Charles Schwab Corporation (CSC) during the annual performance period. Quarterly advances may be paid for the first three quarters. Allocations are discretionary and aligned with CSC and individual performance. Funding for the Plan is determined at the conclusion of the calendar year. Funding will be capped at 200% of target.
At year-end, the full-year funding for both components of the Plan will be pooled together. The total pool is allocated to Plan participants by CSIM senior management based on their assessment of a variety of performance factors.
33
Factors considered in CSIM senior managements allocation process will include objective and subjective factors that will take into consideration total performance and will include, but are not limited to:
|
Fund performance relative to performance measure |
|
Risk management and mitigation |
|
Individual performance against key objectives |
|
Contribution to overall group results |
|
Functioning as an active contributor to the firms success |
|
Team work |
|
Collaboration between Analysts and Portfolio Managers |
|
Regulatory/Compliance management. |
The Portfolio Managers compensation is not based on the value of the assets held in a funds portfolio.
Ownership of Fund Shares. Because the funds had not commenced operations prior to the date of this SAI, no information regarding the Portfolio Managers beneficial ownership of shares of the funds has been included. This information will appear in a future version of the SAI.
BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES
Portfolio Turnover
For reporting purposes, a funds portfolio turnover rate is calculated by dividing the value of purchases or sales of portfolio securities for the fiscal year, whichever is less, by the monthly average value of portfolio securities the fund owned during the fiscal year. When making the calculation, all securities whose maturities at the time of acquisition were one year or less (short-term securities) are excluded.
A 100% portfolio turnover rate would occur, for example, if all portfolio securities (aside from short-term securities) were sold and either repurchased or replaced once during the fiscal year. Typically, funds with high turnover (such as 100% or more) tend to generate higher capital gains and transaction costs, such as brokerage commissions. Because the funds are new, they do not have portfolio turnover rates.
Portfolio Holdings Disclosure
The funds Board of Trustees has approved policies and procedures that govern the timing and circumstances regarding the disclosure of the funds portfolio holdings information to shareholders and third parties. These policies and procedures are designed to ensure that disclosure of information regarding the funds portfolio securities is in the best interests of the funds shareholders, and include procedures to address conflicts between the interests of the funds shareholders, on the one hand, and those of the funds investment adviser, principal underwriter or any affiliated person of the funds, its investment adviser, or its principal underwriter, on the other. Pursuant to such procedures, the Board of Trustees has authorized the President of the Trust to authorize the release of the funds portfolio holdings, as necessary, in conformity with the foregoing principles.
The Board of Trustees exercises on-going oversight of the disclosure of fund portfolio holdings by overseeing the implementation and enforcement of each funds policies and procedures by the Chief Compliance Officer and by considering reports and recommendations by the Chief Compliance Officer concerning any material compliance matters. The Board of Trustees will receive periodic updates, at least annually, regarding entities which were authorized to be
34
provided early disclosure (as defined below) of each funds portfolio holdings information or who may receive portfolio holdings information not available to other current or prospective fund shareholders in connection with the dissemination of information necessary for transactions in Creation Units, as contemplated by the exemptive relief and as discussed below. The Board of Trustees will periodically review any agreements that the Trust has entered into to selectively disclose portfolio holdings.
Each fund discloses its complete portfolio holdings schedule in public filings with the SEC within 60-80 days after the end of each fiscal quarter and will provide that information to shareholders as required by federal securities laws and regulations thereunder. A fund may, however, voluntarily disclose all or part of its portfolio holdings other than in connection with the process of purchasing or redeeming Creation Units, as discussed below, in advance of required filings with the SEC, provided that such information is made generally available to all shareholders and other interested parties in a manner that is consistent with the above policy for disclosure of portfolio holdings information. Such information may be made available through a publicly-available website or other means that make the information available to all likely interested parties contemporaneously.
The funds may disclose portfolio holdings information to certain persons and entities prior to and more frequently than the public disclosure of such information (early disclosure). The President of the Trust may authorize early disclosure of portfolio holdings information to such parties at differing times and/or with different lag times provided that (a) the President of the Trust determines that the disclosure is in the best interests of the funds and that there are no conflicts of interest between the funds shareholders and funds adviser and distributor; and (b) the recipient is, either by contractual agreement or otherwise by law, required to maintain the confidentiality of the information.
Portfolio holdings may be made available on a selective basis to ratings agencies, certain industry organizations, consultants and other qualified financial professionals when the President of the Trust determines such disclosure meets the requirements noted above and serves a legitimate business purpose. Agreements entered into with such entities will describe the permitted use of portfolio holdings and provide that, among other customary confidentiality provisions: (i) the portfolio holdings will be kept confidential; (ii) the person will not trade on the basis of any material non-public information; and (iii) the information will be used only for the purpose described in the agreement.
The funds service providers including, without limitation, the investment adviser, distributor, the custodian, fund accountant, transfer agent, auditor, proxy voting service provider, pricing information venders, publisher, printer and mailing agent may receive disclosure of portfolio holdings information as frequently as daily in connection with the services they perform for the funds. The names of those service providers to whom the funds selectively disclose portfolio holdings information will be disclosed in this SAI. CSIM, Glass Lewis, the Distributor and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as service providers to the funds, are currently receiving this information on a daily basis. RR Donnelley, as a service provider to the funds, is currently receiving this information on a quarterly basis. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and Boston Financial Data Services, Inc., as service providers to the funds, receive this information on an as-needed basis. Service providers are subject to a duty of confidentiality with respect to any portfolio holdings information they receive whether imposed by the provisions of the service providers agreements with the Trust or by the nature of its relationship with the Trust. Although certain of the service providers are not under formal confidentiality obligations in connection with disclosure of portfolio holdings, the fund will not continue to conduct business with a service provider who the fund believes is misusing the disclosed information.
To the extent that a fund invests in an ETF, the Trust will, in accordance with exemptive orders issued by the SEC to ETF sponsors and the procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees, promptly notify the ETF in writing of any purchase or acquisition of shares of the ETF that causes a fund to hold (i) 5% or more of such ETFs total outstanding voting securities, and (ii) 10% or more of such ETFs total outstanding voting securities. In addition, CSIM will, upon causing a fund to acquire more than 3% of an open-end ETFs outstanding shares, notify the open-end ETF of the investment.
35
Further, each business day, each funds portfolio holdings information is provided to the Distributor or other agent for dissemination through the facilities of the National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC) and/or other fee-based subscription services to NSCC members and/or subscribers to those other fee-based subscription services, including Authorized Participants (as defined below), and to entities that publish and/or analyze such information in connection with the process of purchasing or redeeming Creation Units or trading shares of the funds in the secondary market. This information typically reflects each funds anticipated holdings on the following business day.
In addition, each fund discloses its portfolio holdings and the percentages they represent of the funds net assets at least monthly, and as often as each day the fund is open for business, at www.schwabetfs.com/prospectus.
Portfolio holdings information made available in connection with the process of purchasing or redeeming Creation Units may be provided to other entities that provide services to the fund in the ordinary course of business after it has been disseminated to the NSCC.
The funds policies and procedures prohibit the funds, the funds investment adviser or any related party from receiving any compensation or other consideration in connection with the disclosure of portfolio holdings information.
The funds may disclose non-material information including commentary and aggregate information about the characteristics of the funds in connection with or relating to the funds or their portfolio securities to any person if such disclosure is for a legitimate business purpose, such disclosure does not effectively result in the disclosure of the complete portfolio securities of any fund (which can only be disclosed in accordance with the above requirements), and such information does not constitute material non-public information. Such disclosure does not fall within the portfolio securities disclosure requirements outlined above.
Whether the information constitutes material non-public information will be made on a good faith determination, which involves an assessment of the particular facts and circumstances. In most cases commentary or analysis would be immaterial and would not convey any advantage to a recipient in making a decision concerning the funds. Commentary and analysis includes, but is not limited to, the allocation of the funds portfolio securities and other investments among various asset classes, sectors, industries, and countries, the characteristics of the stock components and other investments of the funds, the attribution of fund returns by asset class, sector, industry and country, and the volatility characteristics of the funds.
Portfolio Transactions
The investment adviser makes decisions with respect to the purchase and sale of portfolio securities on behalf of the funds. The investment adviser is responsible for implementing these decisions, including the negotiation of commissions and the allocation of principal business and portfolio brokerage. The funds generally do not incur any commissions or sales charges when they invest in underlying Schwab Funds or Laudus Funds, but they may incur such costs if they invest directly in other types of securities or in unaffiliated funds. Purchases and sales of securities on a stock exchange, including ETF shares, or certain riskless principal transactions placed on NASDAQ are typically effected through brokers who charge a commission for their services. Exchange fees may also apply to transactions effected on an exchange. Purchases and sales of fixed income securities may be transacted with the issuer, the issuers underwriter, or a dealer. The funds do not usually pay brokerage commissions on purchases and sales of fixed income securities, although the price of the securities generally includes compensation, in the form of a spread or a mark-up or mark-down, which is not disclosed separately. The prices the funds pay to underwriters of newly-issued securities usually include a commission paid by the issuer to the underwriter. Transactions placed through dealers who are serving as primary market makers reflect the spread between the bid and asked prices. The money market securities in which the funds may invest are traded primarily in the over-the-counter market on a net basis and do not normally involve either brokerage commissions or transfer taxes. It is expected that the cost of executing portfolio securities transactions of the funds will primarily consist of dealer spreads and brokerage commissions.
36
The investment adviser seeks to obtain the best execution for the funds portfolio transactions. The investment adviser may take a number of factors into account in selecting brokers or dealers to execute these transactions. Such factors may include, without limitation, the following: execution price; brokerage commission or dealer spread; size or type of the transaction; nature or character of the markets; clearance or settlement capability; reputation; financial strength and stability of the broker or dealer; efficiency of execution and error resolution; block trading capabilities; willingness to execute related or unrelated difficult transactions in the future; order of call; ability to facilitate short selling; and provision of additional brokerage or research services or products. In addition, the investment adviser may have incentive sharing arrangements with certain unaffiliated brokers who guarantee market-on-close pricing: on a day when such a broker executes transactions at prices better, on aggregate, than market-on-close prices, that broker may receive, in addition to his or her standard commission, a portion of the net difference between the actual execution prices and corresponding market-on-close prices for that day.
The investment adviser may cause the funds to pay a higher commission than otherwise obtainable from other brokers or dealers in return for brokerage or research services or products if the investment adviser believes that such commission is reasonable in relation to the services provided. In addition to agency transactions, the investment adviser may receive brokerage and research services or products in connection with certain riskless principal transactions, in accordance with applicable SEC and other regulatory guidelines. In both instances, these services or products may include: economic, industry, or company research reports or investment recommendations; subscriptions to financial publications or research data compilations; compilations of securities prices, earnings, dividends, and similar data; computerized databases; quotation equipment and services; research or analytical computer software and services; products or services that assist in effecting transactions, including services of third-party computer systems developers directly related to research and brokerage activities; and effecting securities transactions and performing functions incidental thereto (such as clearance and settlement). The investment adviser may use research services furnished by brokers or dealers in servicing all fund accounts, and not all services may necessarily be used in connection with the account that paid commissions or spreads to the broker or dealer providing such services.
The investment adviser may receive a service from a broker or dealer that has both a research and a non-research use. When this occurs, the investment adviser will make a good faith allocation, under all the circumstances, between the research and non-research uses of the service. The percentage of the service that is used for research purposes may be paid for with fund commissions or spreads, while the investment adviser will use its own funds to pay for the percentage of the service that is used for non-research purposes. In making this good faith allocation, the investment adviser faces a potential conflict of interest, but the investment adviser believe that the costs of such services may be appropriately allocated to their anticipated research and non-research uses.
The investment adviser may purchase new issues of securities in a fixed price offering for the fund. In these situations, the seller may be a member of the selling group that will, in addition to selling securities, provide the investment adviser with research services, in accordance with applicable rules and regulations permitting these types of arrangements. Generally, the seller will provide research credits in these situations at a rate that is higher than that which is available for typical secondary market transactions. These arrangements may not fall within the safe harbor of Section 28(e) of the 1934 Act.
The investment adviser may place orders directly with electronic communications networks or other alternative trading systems. Placing orders with electronic communications networks or other alternative trading systems may enable the funds to trade directly with other institutional holders. At times, this may allow the funds to trade larger blocks than would be possible trading through a single market maker.
The investment adviser may aggregate securities sales or purchases among two or more funds. The investment adviser will not aggregate transactions unless it believes such aggregation is consistent with its duty to seek best execution for each affected fund and is consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement for such fund. In any single transaction in which purchases and/or sales of securities of any issuer for the account of a fund are aggregated with other accounts managed by the investment adviser, the actual prices applicable to the transaction will be averaged among the accounts for which the transaction is effected, including the account of the fund.
37
In determining when and to what extent to use Schwab or any other affiliated broker-dealer as its broker for executing orders for the funds on securities exchanges, the investment adviser follows procedures, adopted by the funds Board of Trustees, that are designed to ensure that affiliated brokerage commissions (if relevant) are reasonable and fair in comparison to unaffiliated brokerage commissions for comparable transactions. The Board of Trustees reviews the procedures annually and approves and reviews transactions involving affiliated brokers quarterly.
The Board of Trustees of the Trust has delegated the responsibility for voting proxies to CSIM through its Advisory Agreement. The Trustees have adopted CSIMs Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures with respect to proxies voted on behalf of the various Schwab Funds portfolios. A description of CSIMs Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures is included in the APPENDIXDESCRIPTION OF PROXY VOTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES.
The Trust is required to disclose annually each funds complete proxy voting record on Form N-PX. After the funds commence operations, each funds proxy voting record for the most recent 12 month period ended June 30th will be available by visiting the Schwab ETFs website at www.schwab.etfs.com/prospectus. The funds Form N-PX will also be available on the SECs website at www.sec.gov.
Brokerage Commissions
The funds are new and, therefore, for each of the last three fiscal years, the funds paid no brokerage commissions.
Regular Broker-Dealers
The funds regular broker-dealers during its most recent fiscal year are: (1) the ten broker-dealers that received the greatest dollar amount of brokerage commissions from the funds; (2) the ten broker-dealers that engaged as principal in the largest dollar amount of portfolio transactions; and (3) the ten broker-dealers that sold the largest dollar amount of the funds shares. The funds are new and, therefore, have not purchased securities issued by any regular broker-dealers.
The funds are a series of Schwab Strategic Trust, an open-end investment management company organized as a Delaware statutory trust on January 27, 2009.
The Declaration of Trust provides for the perpetual existence of the Trust. The Trust may, however, be terminated at any time by vote of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of each series of the Trust or by the vote of the Trustees.
Shareholders are entitled to one vote for each full share held (with fractional votes for fractional shares held) and will vote (to the extent provided on the Declaration of Trust) in the election of Trustees and the termination of the Trust and on other matters submitted to the vote of shareholders. Shareholders will vote by individual series on all matters except (i) when required by the 1940 Act, shares shall be voted in the aggregate and not by individual series and (ii) when the Trustees have determined that the matter affects only the interests of one or more series, then only shareholders of such series shall be entitled to vote thereon. Shareholders of one series shall not be entitled to vote on matters exclusively affecting another series, such matters including, without limitation, the adoption of or change in any fundamental policies or restrictions of the other series and the approval of the investment advisory contracts of the other series.
There will normally be no meetings of shareholders for the purpose of electing Trustees, except that in accordance with the 1940 Act (i) the Trust will hold a shareholders meeting for the election of Trustees at such time as less than a majority of the Trustees holding office have been elected by shareholders, and (ii) if, as a result of a vacancy in the Board of Trustees, less than two-thirds of the Trustees holding office have been elected by the shareholders, that vacancy may only be filled by a vote of the shareholders. In addition, Trustees may be removed from office by a written consent signed by
38
the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares and filed with the Trusts custodian or by a vote of the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares at a meeting duly called for the purpose, which meeting shall be held upon the written request of the holders of not less than 10% of the outstanding shares. Except as set forth above, the Trustees shall continue to hold office and may appoint successor Trustees. Voting rights are not cumulative.
The Trust may, without shareholder vote, restate, amend or otherwise supplement the Declaration of Trust. Shareholders shall have the right to vote on any amendment that could affect their right to vote, any amendment to the Amendments section, any amendment for which shareholder vote may be required by applicable law or by the Trusts registration statement filed with the SEC, and on any amendment submitted to them by the Trustees.
Any series of the Trust may reorganize or merge with one or more other series of the Trust or another investment company. Any such reorganization or merger shall be pursuant to the terms and conditions specified in an agreement and plan of reorganization authorized and approved by the Trustees and entered into by the relevant series in connection therewith. In addition, such reorganization or merger may be authorized by vote of a majority of the Trustees then in office and, to the extent permitted by applicable law, without the approval of shareholders of any series.
Shareholders wishing to submit proposals for inclusion in a proxy statement for a future shareholder meeting should send their written submissions to the Trust at 1 Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456. Proposals must be received a reasonable time in advance of a proxy solicitation to be included. Submission of a proposal does not guarantee inclusion in a proxy statement because proposals must comply with certain federal securities regulations.
PURCHASE, REDEMPTION AND PRICING OF SHARES
Creation and Redemption of Creation Units
The funds are open each day that the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is open (Business Days). The NYSEs trading session is normally conducted from 9:30 a.m. Eastern time until 4:00 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday, although some days, such as in advance of and following holidays, the NYSEs trading session closes early. The following holiday closings are currently scheduled for 2013 2014: New Years Day, Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Presidents Day, Good Friday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Only orders that are received and deemed acceptable by the Distributor no later than the time specified by the Trust will be executed that day at a funds share price calculated that day. On any day that the NYSE closes early, the funds reserve the right to advance the time by which purchase and redemption orders must be received by the Distributor that day to be executed that day at that days share price.
Creation . The Trust issues and sells shares of the funds only in Creation Units on a continuous basis through the Distributor, without a sales load, at the NAV next determined after receipt, on any Business Day, for an order received and deemed acceptable by the Distributor.
Fund Deposit . The consideration for purchase of Creation Units of the funds may consist of (i) the in-kind deposit of a designated portfolio of securities closely approximating the holdings of a fund (the Deposit Securities), and (ii) an amount of cash denominated in U.S. Dollars (the Cash Component) computed as described below. Together, the Deposit Securities and the Cash Component constitute the Fund Deposit, which represents the minimum initial and subsequent investment amount for a Creation Unit of a fund.
The funds may accept a basket of money market instruments, non-U.S. currency or cash denominated in U.S. dollars that differs from the composition of the published basket. The funds may permit or require the consideration for Creation Units to consist solely of cash or non-U.S. currency. The funds may permit or require the substitution of an amount of cash denominated in U.S. Dollars (i.e., a cash in lieu amount) to be added to the Cash Component to replace any Deposit Security. For example, the Trust reserves the right to permit or require a cash in lieu amount where the delivery of the Deposit Security by the Authorized Participant (as described below) would be restricted under the securities laws or where the delivery of the Deposit Security to the Authorized Participant would result in the disposition of the Deposit Security by the Authorized Participant becoming restricted under the securities laws, or in certain other situations.
39
The Cash Component is sometimes also referred to as the Balancing Amount. The Cash Component serves the function of compensating for any differences between the NAV per Creation Unit and the value of the Deposit Securities. If the Cash Component is a positive number (i.e., the NAV per Creation Unit exceeds the value of the Deposit Securities), the creator will deliver the Cash Component. If the Cash Component is a negative number (i.e., the NAV per Creation Unit is less than the value of the Deposit Securities), the creator will receive the Cash Component. Computation of the Cash Component excludes any stamp duty tax or other similar fees and expenses payable upon transfer of beneficial ownership of the Deposit Securities, which shall be the sole responsibility of the Authorized Participant.
The identity and amount of Deposit Securities and Cash Component for a fund changes as the composition of the funds portfolio changes and as rebalancing adjustments and corporate action events are reflected from time to time by CSIM with a view to the investment objective of the fund. The composition of the Deposit Securities may also change in response to adjustments to the weighting or composition of the component securities of a funds benchmark index. The funds also reserve the right to include or remove Deposit Securities from the basket in contemplation of index rebalancing changes.
A fund or its agent, through the NSCC or otherwise, makes available on each Business Day, prior to the opening of business on the NYSE Arca, Inc. Exchange (currently 9:30 a.m., Eastern time), the current Fund Deposit for the fund. Such Deposit Securities are applicable, subject to any adjustments, in order to effect creations of Creation Units of the fund until such time as the next-announced composition of the Deposit Securities is made available.
Procedures for Creation of Creation Units . To be eligible to place orders with the Distributor and to create a Creation Unit of a fund, an entity must be a Depository Trust Company (DTC) participant, such as a broker-dealer, bank, trust company, clearing corporation or certain other organization, some of whom (and/or their representatives) own DTC (each a DTC Participant). DTC acts as securities depositary for the shares. The DTC Participant must have executed an agreement with the Distributor with respect to creations and redemptions of Creation Units (Participant Agreement). A DTC Participant that has executed a Participant Agreement is referred to as an Authorized Participant. Investors should contact the Distributor for the names of Authorized Participants that have signed a Participant Agreement. All shares of a fund, however created, will be entered on the records of DTC in the name of DTC or its nominee and deposited with, or on behalf of, DTC.
All orders to create shares must be placed for one or more Creation Units. Orders must be transmitted by an Authorized Participant pursuant to procedures set forth in the Participant Agreement. The date on which an order to create Creation Units (or an order to redeem Creation Units, as discussed below) is placed is referred to as the Transmittal Date. Orders must be transmitted by an Authorized Participant by telephone or other transmission method acceptable to the Distributor pursuant to procedures set forth in the Participant Agreement, as described below. Economic or market disruptions or changes, or telephone or other communication failure, may impede the ability to reach the Distributor or an Authorized Participant.
On days when the New York Stock Exchange or U.S. or non-U.S. bond markets close earlier than normal, a fund may require purchase orders to be placed earlier in the day. All questions as to the number of Deposit Securities to be delivered, and the validity, form and eligibility (including time of receipt) for the deposit of any tendered securities, will be determined by the Trust, whose determination shall be final and binding.
If the Distributor does not receive both the required Deposit Securities and the Cash Component by the specified time on the settlement date, the Trust may cancel or revoke acceptance of such order. Upon written notice to the Distributor, such canceled or revoked order may be resubmitted the following Business Day using the Fund Deposit as newly constituted to reflect the then current NAV of a fund. The delivery of Creation Units so created generally will occur no later than the settlement date.
40
Creation Units may be created in advance of receipt by the Trust of all or a portion of the applicable Deposit Securities as described below. In these circumstances, the initial deposit will have a value greater than the NAV of the shares on the date the order is placed since, in addition to available Deposit Securities, U.S. cash (or an equivalent amount of non-U.S. currency) must be deposited in an amount equal to the sum of (i) the Cash Component, plus (ii) at least 110% (with respect to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF, Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF, and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF (Domestic Funds)) or 115% (with respect to Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF, Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF, and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (International Funds)), which the Trust may change from time to time, of the market value of the undelivered Deposit Securities (the Additional Cash Deposit) with a fund pending delivery of any missing Deposit Securities. The Authorized Participant must deposit with the custodian the appropriate amount of federal funds by 10:00 a.m. New York time (or such other time as specified by the Trust) on the settlement date. If the Distributor does not receive the Additional Cash Deposit in the appropriate amount by such time, then the order may be deemed to be rejected and the Authorized Participant shall be liable to a fund for losses, if any, resulting therefrom. An additional amount of U.S. cash (or an equivalent amount of non-U.S. currency) shall be required to be deposited with the Distributor, pending delivery of the missing Deposit Securities to the extent necessary to maintain the Additional Cash Deposit with the Trust in an amount at least equal to 110% or 115% as required, which the Trust may change from time to time, of the daily marked to market value of the missing Deposit Securities. To the extent that missing Deposit Securities are not received by the specified time on the settlement date, or in the event a marked-to-market payment is not made within one Business Day following notification by the Distributor that such a payment is required, the Trust may use the cash on deposit to purchase the missing Deposit Securities. The Authorized Participant will be liable to the Trust for the costs incurred by the Trust in connection with any such purchases. These costs will be deemed to include the amount by which the actual purchase price of the Deposit Securities exceeds the market value of such Deposit Securities on the transmittal date plus the brokerage and related transaction costs associated with such purchases. The Trust will return any unused portion of the Additional Cash Deposit once all of the missing Deposit Securities have been properly received by the Distributor or purchased by the Trust and deposited into the Trust. In addition, a transaction fee, as listed below, will be charged in all cases.
Acceptance of Orders for Creation Units . The Trust reserves the absolute right to reject or revoke acceptance of a creation order transmitted to it by the Distributor in respect of a fund. For example, the Trust may reject or revoke acceptance of an order, if (i) the order does not conform to the procedures set forth in the Participant Agreement; (ii) the investor(s), upon obtaining the shares ordered, would own 80% or more of the currently outstanding shares of a fund; (iii) the Deposit Securities delivered are not as disseminated through the facilities of the NSCC for that date by a fund as described above; (iv) acceptance of the Deposit Securities would have certain adverse tax consequences to a fund; (v) acceptance of the Fund Deposit would, in the opinion of counsel, be unlawful; (vi) acceptance of the Fund Deposit would otherwise, in the discretion of the Trust or CSIM, have an adverse effect on the Trust or the rights of beneficial owners; or (vii) in the event that circumstances outside the control of the Trust, the custodian, the Distributor or CSIM make it for all practical purposes impossible to process creation orders. Examples of such circumstances include natural disaster, war, revolution; public service or utility problems such as fires, floods, extreme weather conditions and power outages resulting in telephone, telecopy and computer failures; market conditions or activities causing trading halts; systems failures involving computer or other information systems affecting the Trust, CSIM, the Distributor, DTC, NSCC, custodian (or sub-custodian) or any other participant in the creation process, and similar extraordinary events. The Distributor shall notify a prospective creator of a Creation Unit and/or the Authorized Participant acting on behalf of the creator of a Creation Unit of its rejection of the order of such person. The Trust, custodian (or sub-custodian) and the Distributor are under no duty, however, to give notification of any defects or irregularities in the delivery of Fund Deposits nor shall any of them incur any liability for the failure to give any such notification.
Creation/Redemption Transaction Fee . The funds may impose a Transaction Fee on investors purchasing or redeeming Creation Units. The Transaction Fee will be limited to amounts that have been determined by CSIM to be appropriate. The purpose of the Transaction Fee is to protect the existing shareholders of the fund from the dilutive costs associated with the purchase and redemption of Creation Units. Where the funds permit cash creations (or redemptions) or
41
cash in lieu of depositing one or more Deposit Securities, the purchaser (or redeemer) may be assessed a higher Transaction Fee to offset the transaction cost to the funds of buying (or selling) those particular Deposit Securities. Transaction Fees will differ for the funds, depending on the transaction expenses related to the funds portfolio securities. Every purchaser of a Creation Unit will receive a prospectus that contains disclosure about the Transaction Fee, including the maximum amount of the additional variable Transaction Fee charged by the funds.
The following table sets forth the standard and additional creation/redemption transaction fee for the funds.
Name of Fund |
Approximate
Value of One Creation Unit |
Standard
Creation/Redemption Transaction Fee |
Maximum
Additional Creation Transaction Fee* |
Maximum
Additional Redemption Transaction Fee* |
||||||||||||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF |
$ | 1,250,000 | $ | 1,000 | 3.0 | % | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF |
$ | 1,250,000 | $ | 500 | 3.0 | % | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF |
$ | 1,250,000 | $ | 500 | 3.0 | % | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF |
$ | 2,500,000 | $ | 12,500 | 3.0 | % | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF |
$ | 2,500,000 | $ | 12,500 | 3.0 | % | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF |
$ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,000 | 3.0 | % | 2.0 | % |
* | As a percentage of the total amount invested or redeemed. |
Placement of Redemption Orders . The process to redeem Creation Units works much like the process to purchase Creation Units, but in reverse. Orders to redeem Creation Units of the funds must be delivered through an Authorized Participant. Investors other than Authorized Participants are responsible for making arrangements for a redemption request to be made through an Authorized Participant. Orders must be accompanied or followed by the requisite number of shares of the funds specified in such order, which delivery must be made to the Distributor no later than 10:00 a.m. New York time on the next Business Day following the Transmittal Date. All other procedures set forth in the Participant Agreement must be properly followed.
A funds securities received on redemption will generally correspond pro rata, to the extent practicable, to the securities in the funds portfolio. Fund securities received on redemption may not be identical to Deposit Securities that are applicable to creations of Creation Units. An Authorized Participant submitting a redemption request is deemed to represent to the Trust that it (or its client) (i) owns outright or has full legal authority and legal beneficial right to tender for redemption the requisite number of fund shares to be redeemed and can receive the entire proceeds of the redemption, and (ii) the fund shares to be redeemed have not been loaned or pledged to another party nor are they the subject of a repurchase agreement, securities lending agreement or such other arrangement that would preclude the delivery of such fund shares to the Trust. The Trust reserves the right to verify these representations at its discretion, but will typically require verification with respect to a redemption request from a fund in connection with higher levels of redemption activity and/or short interest in the fund. If the Authorized Participant, upon receipt of a verification request, does not provide sufficient verification of its representations as determined by the Trust, the redemption request will not be considered to have been received in proper form and may be rejected by the Trust.
42
To the extent contemplated by an Authorized Participants agreement, in the event the Authorized Participant has submitted a redemption request but is unable to transfer all or part of the Creation Units to be redeemed to the Distributor, the Distributor will nonetheless accept the redemption request in reliance on the undertaking by the Authorized Participant to deliver the missing shares as soon as possible. Such undertaking shall be secured by the Authorized Participants delivery and maintenance of collateral consisting of cash having a value (marked to market daily) at least equal to 110% for the Domestic Funds and 115% for the International Funds, which CSIM may change from time to time, of the value of the missing shares.
The current procedures for collateralization of missing shares require, among other things, that any cash collateral shall be in the form of U.S. dollars (or, at the discretion of the Trust, non-U.S. currency in an equivalent amount) in immediately-available funds and shall be held by the custodian and marked to market daily. The fees of the custodian (and any sub-custodians) in respect of the delivery, maintenance and redelivery of the cash collateral shall be payable by the Authorized Participant. The Trust, on behalf of the funds, is permitted to purchase the missing shares or acquire the Deposit Securities and the Cash Component underlying such shares at any time and will subject the Authorized Participant to liability for any shortfall between the cost to the Trust of purchasing such shares, Deposit Securities or Cash Component and the value of the collateral.
If the requisite number of shares of a fund is not delivered on the Transmittal Date as described above the fund may reject or revoke acceptance of the redemption request. If it is not possible to effect deliveries of the Fund Securities, the Trust may in its discretion exercise its option to redeem such shares in U.S. cash and the redeeming Authorized Participant will be required to receive its redemption proceeds in cash. In addition, an investor may request a redemption in cash that a fund may, in its sole discretion, permit. In either case, the investor will receive a cash payment equal to the NAV of its shares based on the NAV of shares of the fund next determined after the redemption request is received (minus a redemption transaction fee and additional charge for requested cash redemptions specified above, to offset the Trusts brokerage and other transaction costs associated with the disposition of Fund Securities).
Redemptions of shares for Fund Securities will be subject to compliance with applicable federal and state securities laws and the fund (whether or not it otherwise permits cash redemptions) reserve the right to redeem Creation Units for cash to the extent that the Trust could not lawfully deliver specific Fund Securities upon redemptions or could not do so without first registering the Fund Securities under such laws.
The ability of the Trust to effect in-kind creations and redemptions is subject, among other things, to the condition that, within the time period from the date of the order to the date of delivery of the securities, there are no days that are holidays in the applicable foreign market. Non-U.S. market holiday schedules, coupled with standard settlement cycles, may require that the fund extend settlement longer than seven, but not greater than twelve, calendar days. For every occurrence of one or more intervening holidays in the applicable foreign market that are not holidays observed in the U.S. equity market, the redemption settlement cycle may be extended by the number of such intervening holidays. The holidays applicable to each fund during the 2013 calendar year are listed below. In addition to holidays, other unforeseeable closings in a foreign market due to emergencies may also prevent the Trust from delivering securities within normal settlement period. The funds will not suspend or postpone redemption beyond seven days, except as permitted under Section 22(e) of the 1940 Act or pursuant to exemptive relief obtained by the Trust. Section 22(e) provides that the right of redemption may be suspended or the date of payment postponed with respect to the funds (1) for any period during which the NYSE is closed (other than customary weekend and holiday closings); (2) for any period during which trading on the NYSE is suspended or restricted; (3) for any period during which an emergency exists as a result of which disposal of the shares of a funds portfolio securities or determination of its net asset value is not reasonably practicable; or (4) in such other circumstance as is permitted by the SEC.
43
APPENDIX NON-U.S. MARKET HOLIDAY SCHEDULES of this SAI includes a list of the dates in the 2013 calendar year on which non-U.S. market holdings may affect the relevant securities markets of the listed countries. The list is based on information available to the funds. The list may not be accurate or complete and is subject to change.
Large Shareholder Redemptions . Certain accounts or Schwab affiliates may from time to time own (beneficially or of record) or control a significant percentage of a funds shares. Redemptions by these shareholders of their holdings in a fund, to the extent such redemptions are not executed in the secondary market but rather directly with a fund through an Authorized Participant, may impact a funds liquidity and NAV. These redemptions may also force a fund to sell securities, which may negatively impact the funds brokerage costs.
Pricing of Shares
Each business day, the funds calculate their share price, or NAV, as of the close of the NYSE (generally, 4 p.m. Eastern time). This means that NAVs are calculated using the values of a funds portfolio securities as of the close of the NYSE. Such values are required to be determined in one of two ways: securities for which market quotations are readily available are required to be valued at current market value; and securities for which market quotations are not readily available or the investment adviser deems to be unreliable are required to be valued at fair value using procedures approved by the Board of Trustees.
To the extent a fund invests in foreign securities, shareholders should be aware that because foreign markets are often open on weekends and other days when the fund is closed, the value of some of the funds securities may change on days when it is not possible to buy or sell shares of the fund. The funds use approved pricing sources to provide values for their portfolio securities. Current market values are generally determined by the approved pricing sources as follows: generally, securities traded on exchanges, excluding the NASDAQ National Market System, are valued at the last-quoted sales price on the exchange on which such securities are primarily traded, or, lacking any sales, at the mean between the bid and ask prices; generally securities traded in the over-the-counter market are valued at the last reported sales price that day, or, if no sales are reported, at the mean between the bid and ask prices. Generally securities listed on the NASDAQ National Market System are valued in accordance with the NASDAQ Official Closing Price. In addition, securities that are primarily traded on foreign exchanges are generally valued at the official closing price or last sales price on the exchange where the securities are primarily traded with these values then translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate. Fixed income securities normally are valued based on valuations provided by approved pricing sources. Securities may be fair valued pursuant to procedures approved by the funds Board of Trustees when a security is de-listed or its trading is halted or suspended; when a securitys primary pricing source is unable or unwilling to provide a price; when a securitys primary trading market is closed during regular market hours; or when a securitys value is materially affected by events occurring after the close of the securitys primary trading market. The Board of Trustees regularly reviews fair value determinations made by the funds pursuant to the procedures.
NOTE: Transactions in fund shares will be priced at NAV only if you purchase or redeem shares directly from a fund in Creation Units. Fund shares are purchased or sold on a national securities exchange at market prices, which may be higher (premium) or lower (discount) than NAV.
Federal Tax Information for the Fund
This discussion of federal income tax consequences is based on the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations issued thereunder as in effect on the date of this SAI. New legislation, as well as administrative changes or court decisions, may significantly change the conclusions expressed herein, and may have a retroactive effect with respect to the transactions contemplated herein.
44
It is each funds policy to qualify for taxation as a regulated investment company (RIC) by meeting the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. By qualifying as a RIC, each fund expects to eliminate or reduce to a nominal amount the federal income tax to which it is subject. If a fund does not qualify as a RIC under the Internal Revenue Code, it will be subject to federal income tax on its net investment income and any net realized capital gains. In addition, each fund could be required to recognize unrealized gains, pay substantial taxes and interest, and make substantial distributions before requalifying as a RIC.
Each fund is treated as a separate entity for federal income tax purposes and is not combined with the Trusts other funds. Each fund intends to qualify as a RIC so that it will be relieved of federal income tax on that part of its income that is distributed to shareholders. To qualify for treatment as a RIC, a fund must, among other requirements, distribute annually to its shareholders at least the sum of 90% of its investment company taxable income (generally, net investment income plus the excess, if any, of net short-term capital gain over net long-term capital losses) and 90% of its net tax-exempt income. Among these requirements are the following: (i) at least 90% of a funds gross income each taxable year must be derived from dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans, and gains from the sale or other disposition of stock, securities or foreign currencies, or other income derived with respect to its business of investing in such stock or securities or currencies and net income derived from an interest in a qualified publicly traded partnership; (ii) at the close of each quarter of a funds taxable year, at least 50% of the value of its total assets must be represented by cash and cash items, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs and other securities, with such other securities limited, in respect of any one issuer, to an amount that does not exceed 5% of the value of a funds assets and that does not represent more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer; and (iii) at the close of each quarter of a funds taxable year, not more than 25% of the value of its assets may be invested in securities (other than U.S. government securities or the securities of other RICs) of any one issuer or of two or more issuers and which are engaged in the same, similar, or related trades or businesses if the fund owns at least 20% of the voting power of such issuers, or the securities of one or more qualified publicly traded partnerships.
Certain master limited partnerships may qualify as qualified publicly traded partnerships for purposes of the Subchapter M diversification rules described above. To do so, the master limited partnership must satisfy two requirements during the taxable year. First, the interests of such partnership either must be traded on an established securities market or must be readily tradable on a secondary market (or the substantial equivalent thereof). Second, the partnership must meet the 90% gross income requirements for the exception from treatment as a corporation with gross income other than income consisting of dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans, or gains from the sale or other disposition of stock or securities or foreign currencies, or other income derived with respect to its business of investing in such stock securities or currencies.
The Internal Revenue Code imposes a non-deductible excise tax on RICs that do not distribute in a calendar year (regardless of whether they otherwise have a non-calendar taxable year) an amount equal to 98% of their ordinary income (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code) for the calendar year plus 98.2% of their net capital gain for the one-year period ending on October 31 of such calendar year, plus any undistributed amounts from prior years. The non-deductible excise tax is equal to 4% of the deficiency. For the foregoing purposes, the fund is treated as having distributed any amount on which it is subject to income tax for any taxable year ending in such calendar year. The fund may in certain circumstances be required to liquidate fund investments to make sufficient distributions to avoid federal excise tax liability at a time when the investment adviser might not otherwise have chosen to do so, and liquidation of investments in such circumstances may affect the ability of the fund to satisfy the requirements for qualification as a RIC.
Dividends and interest received from a funds holding of foreign securities may give rise to withholding and other taxes imposed by foreign countries. Tax conventions between certain countries and the United States may reduce or eliminate such taxes. If the funds meet certain requirements, which include a requirement that more than 50% of the value of the funds total assets at the close of its respective taxable year consists of stocks or securities of foreign corporations, then the funds should be eligible to file an election with the Internal Revenue Service that may enable shareholders, in effect, to receive either the benefit of a foreign tax credit, or a tax deduction, with respect to any foreign and U.S. possessions income taxes paid to the funds, subject to certain limitations. Pursuant to this election, the funds will treat those taxes as
45
dividends paid to its shareholders. Each such shareholder will be required to include a proportionate share of those taxes in gross income as income received from a foreign source and must treat the amount so included as if the shareholder had paid the foreign tax directly. The shareholder may then, subject to certain limitations, either deduct the taxes deemed paid by him or her in computing his or her taxable income or, alternatively, use the foregoing information in calculating any foreign tax credit the shareholder may be entitled to use against such shareholders federal income tax. If the funds make this election, the funds will report annually to its shareholders the respective amounts per share of the funds income from sources within, and taxes paid to, foreign countries and U.S. possessions.
The funds transactions in foreign currencies and forward foreign currency contracts will be subject to special provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that, among other things, may affect the character of gains and losses realized by the funds (i.e., may affect whether gains or losses are ordinary or capital), accelerate recognition of income to the funds and defer losses. These rules could therefore affect the character, amount and timing of distributions to shareholders. These provisions also may require the funds to mark-to-market certain types of positions in their portfolios (i.e., treat them as if they were closed out) which may cause the funds to recognize income without receiving cash with which to make distributions in amounts necessary to satisfy the RIC distribution requirements for avoiding income and excise taxes. The funds intend to monitor their transactions, intend to make the appropriate tax elections, and intend to make the appropriate entries in their books and records when they acquire any foreign currency or forward foreign currency contract in order to mitigate the effect of these rules so as to prevent disqualification of the funds as a RIC and minimize the imposition of income and excise taxes.
If the funds own shares in certain foreign investment entities, referred to as passive foreign investment companies or PFIC, the funds will be subject to one of the following special tax regimes: (i) the funds are liable for U.S. federal income tax, and an additional interest charge, on a portion of any excess distribution from such foreign entity or any gain from the disposition of such shares, even if the entire distribution or gain is paid out by the funds as a dividend to its shareholders; (ii) if the funds were able and elected to treat a PFIC as a qualified electing fund or QEF, the funds would be required each year to include in income, and distribute to shareholders in accordance with the distribution requirements set forth above, the funds pro rata share of the ordinary earnings and net capital gains of the passive foreign investment company, whether or not such earnings or gains are distributed to the funds; or (iii) the funds may be entitled to mark-to-market annually shares of the PFIC, and in such event would be required to distribute to shareholders any such mark-to-market gains in accordance with the distribution requirements set forth above.
A funds transactions in futures contracts, forward contracts, foreign currency exchange transactions, options and certain other investment and hedging activities may be restricted by the Internal Revenue Code and are subject to special tax rules. In a given case, these rules may accelerate income to a fund, defer its losses, cause adjustments in the holding periods of a funds assets, convert short-term capital losses into long-term capital losses or otherwise affect the character of a funds income. These rules could therefore affect the amount, timing and character of distributions to shareholders. Each fund will endeavor to make any available elections pertaining to these transactions in a manner believed to be in the best interest of a fund and its shareholders.
Under Section 988 of the Internal Revenue Code, special rules are provided for certain transactions in a foreign currency other than the taxpayers functional currency (i.e., unless certain special rules apply, currencies other than the U.S. dollar). In general, foreign currency gains or losses from forward contracts, from futures contracts that are not regulated futures contracts, and from unlisted options will be treated as ordinary income or loss under Section 988 of the Internal Revenue Code. Also, certain foreign exchange gains or losses derived with respect to foreign fixed income securities are also subject to Section 988 treatment. In general, therefore, Section 988 gains or losses will increase or decrease the amount of a Funds investment company taxable income available to be distributed to shareholders as ordinary income, rather than increasing or decreasing the amount of the Funds net capital gain.
Each fund is required for federal income tax purposes to mark-to-market and recognize as income for each taxable year its net unrealized gains and losses on certain futures contracts as of the end of the year as well as those actually realized during the year. Gain or loss from futures and options contracts on broad-based indexes required to be marked to market
46
will be 60% long-term and 40% short-term capital gain or loss. Application of this rule may alter the timing and character of distributions to shareholders. Each fund may be required to defer the recognition of losses on futures contracts, options contracts and swaps to the extent of any unrecognized gains on offsetting positions held by the fund. It is anticipated that any net gain realized from the closing out of futures or options contracts will be considered gain from the sale of securities and therefore will be qualifying income for purposes of the 90% requirement described above. Each fund distributes to shareholders at least annually any net capital gains which have been recognized for federal income tax purposes, including unrealized gains at the end of the funds fiscal year on futures or options transactions. Such distributions are combined with distributions of capital gains realized on the funds other investments and shareholders are advised on the nature of the distributions.
With respect to investments in zero coupon securities or other securities which are issued with original issue discount, a fund will be required to include as part of its current income the imputed interest on such obligations even though the fund has not received any interest payments on such obligations during that period. Because each fund distributes all of its net investment income to its shareholders, a fund may have to sell fund securities to distribute such imputed income which may occur at a time when the adviser would not have chosen to sell such securities and which may result in taxable gain or loss.
Federal Income Tax Information for Shareholders
The discussion of federal income taxation presented below supplements the discussion in each funds prospectus and only summarizes some of the important federal tax considerations generally affecting shareholders of the funds. Accordingly, prospective investors (particularly those not residing or domiciled in the United States) should consult their own tax advisors regarding the consequences of investing in the funds.
Any dividends declared by a fund in October, November or December and paid the following January are treated, for tax purposes, as if they were received by shareholders on December 31 of the year in which they were declared. In general, distributions by a fund of investment company taxable income (including net short-term capital gains), if any, whether received in cash or additional shares, will be taxable to you as ordinary income. A portion of these distributions may be treated as qualified dividend income (eligible for the reduced rates to individuals as described below) to the extent that a fund receives qualified dividend income. Qualified dividend income is, in general, dividend income from taxable domestic corporations and certain foreign corporations (e.g., foreign corporations incorporated in a possession of the United States or in certain countries with a comprehensive tax treaty with the United States, or the stock of which is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States). A dividend will not be treated as qualified dividend income to the extent that (i) the shareholder has not held the shares of the fund on which the dividend was paid for more than 60 days during the 121-day period that begins on the date that is 60 days before the date on which the shares of a fund become ex-dividend with respect to such dividend (and each fund also satisfies those holding period requirements with respect to the securities it holds that paid the dividends distributed to the shareholder), (ii) the shareholder is under an obligation (whether pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to make related payments with respect to substantially similar or related property, or (iii) the shareholder elects to treat such dividend as investment income under section 163(d)(4)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code. Dividends received by each fund from a REIT or another RIC may be treated as qualified dividend income only to the extent the dividend distributions are attributable to qualified dividend income received by such REIT or RIC. It is expected that dividends received by the fund from a REIT and distributed to a shareholder generally will be taxable to the shareholder as ordinary income.
Distributions from net capital gain (if any) that are reported as capital gains dividends are taxable as long-term capital gains without regard to the length of time the shareholder has held shares of a fund. However, if you receive a capital gains dividend with respect to fund shares held for six months or less, any loss on the sale or exchange of those shares shall, to the extent of the capital gains dividend, be treated as a long-term capital loss. Under the recently enacted American Taxpayer Relief Act (the Act) of 2012, the maximum individual rate applicable to qualified dividend income and long-term capital gains for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, depends on whether the taxpayers income exceeds certain threshold amounts. The maximum rate is generally 15% for taxpayers whose income is equal to or less than $400,000 (individual filers) or $450,000 (married filing jointly), and 20% for taxpayers whose income exceeds the foregoing thresholds.
47
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, an additional 3.8% Medicare tax will be imposed on certain net investment income (including ordinary dividends and capital gain distributions received from a fund and net gains from redemptions or other taxable dispositions of fund shares) of U.S. individuals, estates and trusts to the extent that such persons modified adjusted gross income (in the case of an individual) or adjusted gross income (in the case of an estate or trust) exceeds a threshold amount.
A fund will inform you of the amount of your ordinary income dividends and capital gain distributions, if any, at the time they are paid and will advise you of their tax status for federal income tax purposes, including what portion of the distributions will be qualified dividend income, shortly after the close of each calendar year.
If a fund makes a distribution to a shareholder in excess of a funds current and accumulated earnings and profits in any taxable year, the excess distribution will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of the shareholders tax basis in its shares, and thereafter, as capital gain. A return of capital is not taxable, but reduces a shareholders tax basis in its shares, thus reducing any loss or increasing any gain on a subsequent taxable disposition by the shareholder of its shares.
For corporate investors in a fund, dividend distributions a fund reports as dividends received from qualifying domestic corporations will be eligible for the 70% corporate dividends-received deduction to the extent they would qualify if the fund were a regular corporation. Distributions by a fund also may be subject to state, local and foreign taxes, which may differ from the federal income tax treatment described above.
A sale of shares in a fund may give rise to a gain or loss. In general, any gain or loss realized upon a taxable disposition of shares will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the shares have been held for more than one year. Otherwise, the gain or loss on the taxable disposition of shares will be treated as short-term capital gain or loss. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, the maximum tax rate on long-term capital gains available to non-corporate shareholders is generally 15% for taxpayers whose income is equal to or less than $400,000 (individual filers) or $450,000 (married filing jointly), and 20% for taxpayers whose income exceeds the foregoing thresholds. Any loss realized upon a taxable disposition of shares held for six months or less will be treated as long-term, rather than short-term, to the extent of any long-term capital gain distributions received (or deemed received) by the shareholder with respect to the shares. All or a portion of any loss realized upon a taxable disposition of shares will be disallowed if other substantially identical shares of a fund are purchased within 30 days before or after the disposition. In such a case, the basis of the newly purchased shares will be adjusted to reflect the disallowed loss.
An Authorized Participant who exchanges securities for Creation Units generally will recognize a gain or a loss. The gain or loss will be equal to the difference between the market value of the Creation Units at the time and the sum of the exchangers aggregate basis in the securities surrendered plus the amount of cash paid for such Creation Units. A person who redeems Creation Units will generally recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference between the exchangers basis in the Creation Units and the sum of the aggregate market value of any securities received plus the amount of any cash received for such Creation Units. The Internal Revenue Service, however, may assert that a loss realized upon an exchange of securities for Creation Units cannot be deducted currently under the rules governing wash sales, or on the basis that there has been no significant change in economic position.
Any capital gain or loss realized upon the creation of Creation Units will generally be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the securities exchanged for such Creation Units have been held for more than one year. Any capital gain or loss realized upon the redemption of Creation Units will generally be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the shares comprising the Creation Units have been held for more than one year. Otherwise, such capital gains or losses will be treated as short-term capital gains or losses.
48
Certain tax-exempt shareholders, including qualified pension plans, individual retirement accounts, salary deferral arrangements, 401(k)s, and other tax-exempt entities, generally are exempt from federal income taxation except with respect to their unrelated business taxable income (UBTI). Under current law, each fund generally serves to block UBTI from being realized by their tax-exempt shareholders. However, notwithstanding the foregoing, a tax-exempt shareholder could realize UBTI by virtue of its investment in a fund where, for example, (i) a fund invests in REITs that hold residual interests in real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs) or (ii) its shares in a fund constitutes debt-financed property in the hands of the tax-exempt shareholder within the meaning of section 514(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. Charitable remainder trusts are subject to special rules and should consult their tax advisors. There are no restrictions preventing a fund from holding investments in REITs that hold residual interests in REMICs, and a fund may do so. The Internal Revenue Service has issued recent guidance with respect to these issues and prospective shareholders, especially charitable remainder trusts, are strongly encouraged to consult with their tax advisors regarding these issues.
Each fund has the right to reject an order to for Creation Units if the purchaser (or group of purchasers) would, upon obtaining the shares so ordered, own 80% or more of the outstanding shares of the fund and if, pursuant to section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code, the respective fund would have a basis in the deposit securities different from the market value of such securities on the date of deposit. Each fund also has the right to require information necessary to determine beneficial Share ownership for purposes of the 80% determination.
Backup Withholding Each fund will be required in certain cases to withhold at the applicable withholding rate and remit to the U.S. Treasury the withheld amount of taxable dividends and redemption proceeds paid to any shareholder who (1) fails to provide a correct taxpayer identification number certified under penalty of perjury; (2) is subject to withholding by the Internal Revenue Service for failure to properly report all payments of interest or dividends; (3) fails to provide a certified statement that he or she is not subject to backup withholding; or (4) fails to provide a certified statement that he or she is a U.S. person (including a U.S. resident alien). Backup withholding is not an additional tax and any amounts withheld may be credited against the shareholders ultimate U.S. tax liability.
Disclosure for Non-U.S. Shareholders Foreign shareholders (i.e., nonresident alien individuals and foreign corporations, partnerships, trusts and estates) are generally subject to U.S. withholding tax at the rate of 30% (or a lower tax treaty rate) on distributions derived from net investment income and short-term capital gains; provided, however, that for a funds taxable year beginning before January 1, 2014 ( or a later date, if extended by the U.S. Congress), U.S. source interest related dividends and short-term capital gain dividends generally will not be subject to U.S. withholding tax if a fund elects to make reports with respect to such dividends. Distributions to foreign shareholders of such short-term capital gain dividends and of long-term capital gains, and any gains from the sale or other disposition of shares of a fund, generally are not subject to U.S. taxation, unless the recipient is an individual who either (1) meets the Internal Revenue Codes definition of resident alien or (2) is physically present in the U.S. for 183 days or more per year. Different tax consequences may result if the foreign shareholder is engaged in a trade or business within the United States. In addition, the tax consequences to a foreign shareholder entitled to claim the benefits of a tax treaty may be different than those described above. Notwithstanding the foregoing, income, if any, derived by a fund from investments in REITs that hold residual interests in real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs) may subject a foreign shareholder to U.S. federal income taxation at the rate of 30% with the ability to claim an exemption or reduction in rate. Foreign shareholders may also be subject to U.S. estate taxes with respect to shares in a fund.
Effective July 1, 2014, the funds will be required to withhold U.S. tax (at a 30% rate) on payments of taxable dividends and (effective January 1, 2017) redemption proceeds made to certain non-U.S. entities that fail to comply (or be deemed compliant) with extensive new reporting and withholding requirements designed to inform the U.S. Department of the Treasury of U.S.-owned foreign investment accounts. Shareholders may be requested to provide additional information to the Funds to enable the Funds to determine whether withholding is required.
The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 retroactively extended through December 31, 2013, a look-through rule for distributions of so-called FIRPTA gain by a fund if the fund is classified as a qualified investment entity, which includes an entity taxable as a RIC if, in general, more than 50% of the RICs assets consists of interests in REITs and
49
other U.S. real property holding corporations. If this condition is met, in the absence of certain exceptions (described below), distributions by a fund to a foreign shareholder, to the extent derived from gain from the disposition of a U.S. real property interest (USRPI), may also be treated as FIRPTA gain and therefore subject to U.S. withholding tax at a rate of 35%, and require that the foreign shareholder file nonresident U.S. income tax returns. Also, such gain may be subject to a 30% branch profits tax in the hands of a foreign shareholder that is a corporation. Absent further legislative action, after December 31, 2013, if a fund is classified as a qualified investment entity, the look-through will apply only in respect of fund distributions that are attributable to REIT distributions received by the fund.
Provided, however, that the class of fund shares held by a foreign shareholder is regularly traded on an established U.S. securities exchange and the foreign shareholder did not own more than 5% of that class of shares at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of the distribution, distributions made by the fund will not be treated as FIRPTA gain under the look-through rule; instead, capital gain distributions from USRPI gain in the hands of a foreign shareholder will be taxed as ordinary income and generally will be subject to withholding at a 30% rate (or lower treaty rate). In addition, the look-through rule for distributions of FIRPTA gain will not apply to a fund distribution if the fund is a domestically controlled entity, meaning that less than 50% of the shares of the fund is held directly or indirectly by foreign shareholders for a five-year period ending on the date of the distribution.
Reportable Transactions Under U.S. Treasury regulations, if a shareholder recognizes a loss of $2 million or more for an individual shareholder or $10 million or more for a corporate shareholder, the shareholder must file with the Internal Revenue Service a disclosure statement on Form 8886. Direct shareholders of portfolio securities are in many cases excepted from this reporting requirement, but under current guidance, shareholders of a RIC such as the funds are not excepted. Future guidance may extend the current exception from this reporting requirement to shareholders of most or all RICs. The fact that a loss is reportable under these regulations does not affect the legal determination of whether the taxpayers treatment of the loss is proper. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors to determine the applicability of these regulations in light of their individual circumstances.
Shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors as to the state and local tax rules affecting investments in the funds.
50
Appendix ANon-U.S. Market Holiday Schedules
The following list sets forth the dates in the 2013 calendar year on which non-U.S. market holdings may affect the relevant securities markets of the listed countries. The list is based on information available to the funds. The list may not be accurate or complete and is subject to change.
Australia
January 1 January 28 March 4 March 11 |
March 29 April 1 April 25 May 6 |
June 3
June 10 August 5 August 14 |
September 30
October 7 November 5 December 24 |
December 25
December 26 December 31 |
||||
Austria | ||||||||
January 1 March 29 April 1 |
May 1 May 9 May 20 |
May 30
August 15 November 1 |
December 24
December 25 |
December 26
December 31 |
||||
Belgium | ||||||||
January 1 March 29 April 1 |
May 1 May 9 May 10 |
May 20
July 11 August 15 |
September 27
November 1 November 11 |
December 25
December 26 |
||||
Brazil | ||||||||
January 1 January 25 February 11 |
February 12 February 13 March 29 |
May 1
May 30 July 9 |
November 15
November 20 December 24 |
December 25
December 31 |
||||
Canada | ||||||||
January 1 January 2 February 18 |
March 29 May 20 June 24 |
July 1
August 5 September 2 |
October 14
November 11 |
December 25
December 26 |
||||
Chile | ||||||||
January 1 March 29 May 1 |
May 21 May 27 |
August 15
September 18 |
September 19
November 1 |
December 25
December 31 |
51
52
Germany | ||||||||
January 1 February 11 March 29 |
April 1 May 1 May 9 |
May 20
May 30 August 15 |
October 3
November 1 December 24 |
December 25
December 26 December 31 |
||||
Greece | ||||||||
January 1 March 18 March 25 |
March 29 April 1 May 1 |
May 3
May 6 June 24 |
August 15
October 28 |
December 25
December 26 |
||||
Hong Kong | ||||||||
January 1 February 11 February 12 February 13 |
March 29 April 1 April 4 May 1 |
May 17
June 12 July 1 September 20 |
October 1
October 14 December 24 |
December 25
December 26 December 31 |
||||
Hungary | ||||||||
January 1 March 15 April 1 |
May 1 May 20 August 19 |
August 20
October 23 |
November 1
December 24 |
December 25
December 26 |
||||
India | ||||||||
January 25 January 26 March 27 March 29 April 1 April 11 |
April 19 April 20 April 23 May 1 May 25 |
June 29
July 1 August 9 August 10 August 15 |
August 22
September 9 September 30 October 2 October 16 |
November 4
November 5 November 14 November 15 December 25 |
||||
Indonesia | ||||||||
January 1 January 25 March 12 March 29 |
April 11 May 9 June 7 August 7 |
August 8
August 9 August 12 August 13 |
October 15
November 4 November 5 December 24 |
December 25
December 26 December 30 December 31 |
||||
Ireland | ||||||||
January 1 March 18 March 29 |
April 1 May 1 May 6 |
June 3
August 5 October 28 |
December 24
December 25 |
December 26
December 27 |
53
Israel | ||||||||
The Israel market is closed every Friday. | ||||||||
January 22 February 24 March 25 March 26 |
March 31 April 1 April 14 April 15 |
May 14
May 15 July 16 September 4 |
September 5
September 6 September 13 September 18 |
September 19
September 25 September 26 |
||||
Italy | ||||||||
January 1 March 29 April 1 |
April 25 May 1 |
August 15
November 1 |
December 24
December 25 |
December 26
December 31 |
||||
Japan | ||||||||
January 1 January 2 January 3 January 14 |
February 11 March 20 April 29 |
May 3
May 6 July 15 |
September 16
September 23 October 14 |
November 4
December 23 December 31 |
||||
Luxembourg | ||||||||
January 1 March 29 |
April 1 May 1 |
May 9
May 20 |
August 15
October 1 |
December 25
December 26 |
||||
Malaysia | ||||||||
January 1 January 24 January 28 February 1 February 11 |
February 12 May 1 May 24 May 25 |
May 30
May 31 June 1 August 7 |
August 8
August 9 August 31 September 16 |
October 15
November 4 November 5 December 25 |
||||
Mexico | ||||||||
January 1 February 4 February 5 |
March 18 March 21 March 28 |
March 29
May 1 September 16 |
November 18
November 20 |
December 12
December 25 |
||||
Netherlands | ||||||||
January 1 March 29 |
April 1 April 30 |
May 1
May 9 |
May 20
December 25 |
December 26 | ||||
54
New Zealand | ||||||||
January 1 January 2 January 21 |
January 28 February 6 March 29 |
April 1
April 25 |
June 3
October 28 |
December 25
December 26 |
||||
Norway | ||||||||
January 1 March 27 March 28 |
March 29 April 1 May 1 |
May 9
May 17 May 20 |
December 24
December 25 |
December 26
December 31 |
||||
Philippines | ||||||||
January 1 February 25 March 28 March 29 |
April 8 May 1 May 13 |
June 12
August 8 August 9 |
August 21
November 1 December 24 |
December 25
December 30 December 31 |
||||
Poland | ||||||||
January 1 March 29 April 1 |
May 1 May 3 May 30 |
August 15
November 1 |
November 11
December 24 |
December 25
December 26 |
||||
Russia | ||||||||
January 1 January 2 January 3 January 4 January 5 |
January 6 January 7 January 9 January 8 |
February 22
February 23 February 25 March 7 |
March 8
April 30 May 1 May 9 |
May 10
June 11 June 12 November 4 |
||||
Singapore | ||||||||
January 1 February 11 February 12 |
March 29 May 1 May 24 |
May 25
August 8 August 9 |
October 15
November 2 |
November 4
December 25 |
||||
South Africa | ||||||||
January 1 March 21 March 29 |
April 1 May 1 |
June 17
August 9 |
September 24
December 16 |
December 25
December 26 |
||||
55
South Korea | ||||||||
January 1 February 11 March 1 |
April 5 May 1 May 17 |
June 6
June 17 August 15 |
September 18
September 19 September 20 |
October 3
December 25 December 31 |
||||
Spain | ||||||||
January 1 January 7 March 19 |
March 28 March 29 April 1 |
May 1
May 2 May 15 |
August 15
November 1 December 6 |
December 25
December 26 |
||||
Sweden | ||||||||
January 1 March 28 March 29 |
April 1 May 1 May 8 |
May 9
June 6 June 21 |
November 1
December 24 December 25 |
December 26
December 31 |
||||
Switzerland | ||||||||
January 1 January 2 March 19 March 29 |
April 1 May 1 May 9 May 20 |
May 30
August 1 August 15 |
September 5
November 1 December 24 |
December 25
December 26 December 31 |
||||
Taiwan | ||||||||
January 1 February 7 February 8 February 11 |
February 12 February 13 February 14 |
February 15
February 28 April 4 |
April 5
May 1 June 12 |
September 19
September 20 October 10 |
||||
Thailand | ||||||||
January 1 February 25 April 8 April 15 |
April 16 May 1 May 6 |
May 24
May 27 July 1 |
July 23
August 12 October 23 |
December 5
December 10 December 31 |
||||
Turkey | ||||||||
January 1 April 23 August 7 |
August 8 August 9 August 30 |
October 14
October 15 October 16 |
October 17
October 18 |
October 28
October 29 |
||||
United Kingdom | ||||||||
January 1 March 29 |
April 1 May 6 |
May 27
August 26 |
December 24
December 25 |
December 26
December 31 |
56
Appendix Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures
Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.
The Charles Schwab Family of Funds
Schwab Investments
Schwab Capital Trust
Schwab Annuity Portfolios
Laudus Trust
Laudus Institutional Trust
Schwab Strategic Trust
Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures
As of April 2012
Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. (CSIM), as an investment adviser, is generally responsible for voting proxies with respect to the securities held in accounts of investment companies and other clients for which it provides discretionary investment management services. CSIMs Proxy Committee exercises and documents CSIMs responsibility with regard to voting of client proxies (the Proxy Committee). The Proxy Committee is composed of representatives of CSIMs Fund Administration, Portfolio Management, and Legal Departments, and chaired by CSIMs Chief Investment Officer, Equities or his/her delegate. The Proxy Committee reviews and, as necessary, may amend periodically these Procedures to address new or revised proxy voting policies or procedures. The policies stated in these Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures (the CSIM Proxy Procedures) pertain to all of CSIMs clients.
The Boards of Trustees (the Trustees) of The Charles Schwab Family of Funds, Schwab Investments, Schwab Capital Trust, and Schwab Annuity Portfolios (Schwab Funds) have delegated the responsibility for voting proxies to CSIM through their respective Investment Advisory and Administration Agreements. In addition, the Boards of Trustees (the Trustees) of Laudus Trust and Laudus Institutional Trust (Laudus Funds) and the Schwab Strategic Trust (Schwab ETFs; collectively, the Schwab Funds, the Laudus Funds and the Schwab ETFs are the Funds) have delegated the responsibility for voting proxies to CSIM through their respective investment advisory and administration agreements. The Trustees have adopted these Proxy Procedures with respect to proxies voted on behalf of the various Schwab Funds, Laudus Funds, and Schwab ETFs portfolios. CSIM will present amendments to the Trustees for approval. However, there may be circumstances where the Proxy Committee deems it advisable to amend the Proxy Procedures between regular Schwab Funds, Laudus Funds and Schwab ETFs Board meetings. In such cases, the Trustees will be asked to ratify any changes at the next regular meeting of the Board.
To assist CSIM in its responsibility for voting proxies and the overall proxy voting process, CSIM has retained Glass Lewis & Co. (Glass Lewis) as an expert in the proxy voting and corporate governance area. The services provided by Glass Lewis include in-depth research, global issuer analysis, and voting recommendations as well as vote execution, reporting and record keeping.
Page 1 of 5
Proxy Voting Policy
For investment companies and other clients for which CSIM exercises its responsibility for voting proxies, it is CSIMs policy to vote proxies in the manner that CSIM and the Proxy Committee believes will maximize the economic benefit to CSIMs clients. In furtherance of this policy, the Proxy Committee has received and reviewed Glass Lewis written proxy voting policies and procedures (Glass Lewis Proxy Procedures) and has determined that Glass Lewis Proxy Procedures are consistent with the CSIM Proxy Procedures and CSIMs fiduciary duty with respect to its clients. The Proxy Committee has also implemented custom policies as set forth below. The Proxy Committee will review any material amendments to Glass Lewis Proxy Procedures to determine whether such procedures continue to be consistent with the CSIM Proxy Voting Procedures, and CSIMs fiduciary duty with respect to its clients.
Except under each of the circumstances described below, the Proxy Committee will delegate to Glass Lewis responsibility for voting proxies, including timely submission of votes, on behalf of CSIMs clients in accordance with Glass Lewis Proxy Procedures.
For proxy issues that the Proxy Committee or the applicable portfolio manager or other relevant portfolio management staff believe raise significant concerns with respect to the accounts of CSIM clients, the Proxy Committee will review the analysis and recommendation of Glass Lewis. Examples of factors that could cause a matter to raise significant concerns include, but are not limited to: issues whose outcome has the potential to materially affect the companys industry, or regional or national economy, and matters which involve broad public policy developments which may similarly materially affect the environment in which the company operates. The Proxy Committee also will solicit input from the assigned portfolio manager and other relevant portfolio management staff for the particular portfolio security. After evaluating all such recommendations, the Proxy Committee will decide how to vote the shares and will instruct Glass Lewis to vote consistent with its decision. The Proxy Committee has the ultimate responsibility for making the determination of how to vote the shares to seek to maximize the value of that particular holding.
With respect to proxies of a Fund, the Proxy Committee will vote such proxies in the same proportion as the vote of all other shareholders of the Fund ( i.e. , echo vote), unless otherwise required by law. When required by law or applicable exemptive order, the Proxy Committee will also echo vote proxies of an unaffiliated mutual fund or exchange traded fund (ETF). For example, certain exemptive orders issued to the Funds by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Section 12(d)(1)(F) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, require the Funds, under certain circumstances, to echo vote proxies of registered investment companies that serve as underlying investments of the Funds. When not required to echo vote, the Proxy Committee will delegate to Glass Lewis responsibility for voting proxies of an unaffiliated mutual fund or ETF in accordance with Glass Lewis Proxy Procedures, subject to the custom policies set forth below.
Page 2 of 5
In addition, with respect to holdings of The Charles Schwab Corporation (CSC) (ticker symbol: SCHW), the Proxy Committee will vote such proxies in the same proportion as the vote of all other shareholders of CSC ( i.e. , echo vote), unless otherwise required by law.
Exceptions from Glass Lewis Proxy Procedures : The Proxy Committee has reviewed the particular policies set forth in Glass Lewis Proxy Procedures and has determined that the implementation of the following custom policies is consistent with CSIMs fiduciary duty to its clients:
|
Independent Chairman : With respect to shareholder proposals requiring that a company chairmans position be filled by an independent director, the Proxy Committee has instructed Glass Lewis to vote with management on such proposals unless the company does not meet the applicable minimum total shareholder return threshold, as calculated below. In cases where a company fails to meet the threshold, the Proxy Committee has instructed Glass Lewis to vote the shareholder proposals requiring that the chairmans position be filled by an independent director in accordance with Glass Lewis Proxy Procedures. In cases where a company is a registered investment company, the Proxy Committee has instructed Glass Lewis to vote with management on such proposals. Additionally, with respect to the election of a director who serves as the governance committee chair (or, in the absence of a governance committee, the chair of the nominating committee), the Proxy Committee has instructed Glass Lewis to vote for the director in cases where the company chairmans position is not filled by an independent director and an independent lead or presiding director has not been appointed. |
|
Classified Boards : With respect to shareholder proposals declassifying a staggered board in favor of the annual election of directors, the Proxy Committee has instructed Glass Lewis to vote with management on such proposals unless the company does not meet the applicable minimum total shareholder return threshold, as calculated below. In cases where a company fails to meet the threshold, the Proxy Committee has instructed Glass Lewis to vote the shareholder proposals declassifying a staggered board in favor of the annual election of directors in accordance with Glass Lewis Proxy Procedures. |
|
Proxy Access : With respect to shareholder proposals requesting proxy access for shareholders, the Proxy Committee has instructed Glass Lewis to vote with management on such proposals unless the company does not meet one of the following triggers: |
|
The company did not implement a shareholder proposal that was passed by shareholders at two previous shareholder meetings. |
|
The company nominated directors for election that did not receive a majority of shareholder support at the previous shareholder meeting. |
|
The company had material financial statement restatements. |
|
The companys board adopted a poison pill during the past year and did not put the adoption up for shareholder approval. |
Page 3 of 5
In cases where a company fails to meet the threshold, the Proxy Committee has instructed Glass Lewis to vote shareholder proposals requesting proxy access in accordance with Glass Lewis Proxy Procedures.
Glass Lewis uses a three-year total return performance methodology to calculate the applicable minimum total shareholder return threshold. For Russell 3000 Index constituents, if a companys total annual shareholder return is in the bottom 25% of Russell 3000 constituent companies total annual shareholder returns for three consecutive years, the company will be deemed not to have met the threshold. For companies not in the Russell 3000 Index, the universe of companies used for the minimum total shareholder return threshold calculation is all Glass Lewis covered companies outside of the Russell 3000 Index.
If Glass Lewis does not provide an analysis or recommendation for voting a particular proxy measure or measures, CSIM will generally abstain, however (1) two members of the Proxy Committee, including at least one representative from Portfolio Management, in consultation with the Chair of the Proxy Committee or his/her designee, may decide how to vote such proxy, or (2) the Proxy Committee may meet to decide how to vote such proxy.
Conflicts of Interest . Except as described above for proxies solicited by the Funds or CSC and the exceptions to Glass Lewis Proxy Procedures, proxy issues that present material conflicts of interest between CSIM, and/or any of its affiliates, and CSIMs clients, CSIM will delegate to Glass Lewis responsibility for voting such proxies in accordance with Glass Lewis Proxy Procedures.
Voting Foreign Proxies . CSIM has arrangements with Glass Lewis for voting proxies. However, voting proxies with respect to shares of foreign securities may involve significantly greater effort and corresponding cost than voting proxies with respect to domestic securities, due to the variety of regulatory schemes and corporate practices in foreign countries with respect to proxy voting. Problems voting foreign proxies may include the following:
|
proxy statements and ballots written in a foreign language; |
|
untimely and/or inadequate notice of shareholder meetings; |
|
restrictions of foreigners ability to exercise votes; |
|
requirements to vote proxies in person; |
|
requirements to provide local agents with power of attorney to facilitate CSIMs voting instructions. |
In consideration of the foregoing issues, Glass Lewis uses its best-efforts to vote foreign proxies. As part of its ongoing oversight, the Proxy Committee will monitor the voting of foreign proxies to determine whether all reasonable steps are taken to vote foreign proxies. If the Proxy Committee determines that the cost associated with the attempt to vote outweighs the potential benefits clients may derive from voting, the Proxy Committee may decide not to attempt to vote. In addition, certain foreign countries impose restrictions on the sale of securities for a period of time before and/or after the shareholder meeting. To avoid these trading restrictions, the Proxy Committee instructs Glass Lewis not to vote such foreign proxies.
Page 4 of 5
Securities Lending Programs . Certain of the Funds enter into securities lending arrangements with lending agents to generate additional revenue for their portfolios. In securities lending arrangements, any voting rights that accompany the loaned securities generally pass to the borrower of the securities, but the lender retains the right to recall a security and may then exercise the securitys voting rights. In order to vote the proxies of securities out on loan, the securities must be recalled prior to the established record date. CSIM will use its best efforts to recall a Funds securities on loan and vote such securities proxies if (a) the proxy relates to a special meeting of shareholders of the issuer (as opposed to the issuers annual meeting of shareholders), or (b) the Fund owns more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the issuer. Further, it is CSIMs policy to use its best efforts to recall securities on loan and vote such securities proxies if CSIM determines that the proxies involve a material event affecting the loaned securities. CSIM may utilize third-party service providers to assist it in identifying and evaluating whether an event is material. CSIM may also recall securities on loan and vote such securities proxies in its discretion.
Sub-Advisory Relationships . Where CSIM has delegated day-to-day investment management responsibilities to an investment sub-adviser, CSIM may (but generally does not) delegate proxy voting responsibility to such investment sub-adviser. Each sub-adviser to whom proxy voting responsibility has been delegated will be required to review all proxy solicitation material and to exercise the voting rights associated with the securities it has been allocated in the best interest of each investment company and its shareholders, or other client. Prior to delegating the proxy voting responsibility, CSIM will review each sub-advisers proxy voting policy to determine whether it believes that each sub-advisers proxy voting policy is generally consistent with the maximization of economic benefits to the investment company or other client.
Reporting and Record Retention
CSIM will maintain, or cause Glass Lewis to maintain, records that identify the manner in which proxies have been voted (or not voted) on behalf of CSIM clients. CSIM will comply with all applicable rules and regulations regarding disclosure of its or its clients proxy voting records and procedures.
CSIM will retain all proxy voting materials and supporting documentation as required under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and the rules and regulations thereunder.
Page 5 of 5
PROXY PAPERTM GUIDELINES 2013 PROXY SEAS On AN OVERVIEW OF THE GLASS LEWIS APPROACH TO PROXY ADVICE UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT 2012 GLASS LEWIS, & CO., LLC GUIDELINES GLASS LEWIS & CO.
1 | ||||
II. A BOARD OF DIRECTORS THAT SERVES THE INTERESTS OF SHAREHOLDERS |
3 | |||
3 | ||||
3 | ||||
6 | ||||
14 | ||||
14 | ||||
16 | ||||
Unofficially Controlled Companies and 20-50% Beneficial Owners |
17 | |||
17 | ||||
18 | ||||
19 | ||||
19 | ||||
20 | ||||
20 | ||||
20 | ||||
21 | ||||
21 | ||||
22 | ||||
22 | ||||
22 | ||||
23 | ||||
24 | ||||
24 | ||||
25 |
I
Additional Scrutiny for Companies with Significant Opposition in 2011 |
26 | |||
26 | ||||
26 | ||||
27 | ||||
27 | ||||
28 | ||||
28 | ||||
28 | ||||
29 | ||||
30 | ||||
31 | ||||
31 | ||||
32 | ||||
32 | ||||
32 | ||||
32 | ||||
33 | ||||
33 | ||||
34 | ||||
34 | ||||
35 | ||||
35 | ||||
35 | ||||
36 | ||||
36 | ||||
36 | ||||
37 | ||||
37 | ||||
37 | ||||
38 | ||||
Authorization to Sell Shares at a Price below Net Asset Value |
38 | |||
VI. COMPENSATION, ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE SHAREHOLDER INITIATIVES |
39 |
II
I. OVERVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT UPDATES FOR 2013
Glass Lewis evaluates these guidelines on an ongoing basis and formally updates them on an annual basis. This year weve made noteworthy enhancements in the following areas, which are summarized below but discussed in greater detail throughout this document:
BOARD RESPONSIVENESS TO A SIGNIFICANT SHAREHOLDER VOTE
|
Weve included a general section clarifying our long-standing approach in this area. Glass Lewis believes that any time 25% or more of shareholders vote against the recommendation of management, the board should demonstrate some level of engagement and responsiveness to address the shareholder concerns. |
The Role of a Committee Chairman
|
Weve included a general section explaining our analysis of the role of a committee chairman. Glass Lewis believes that a designated committee chairman maintains primary responsibility for the actions of his or her respective committee. As such, many of our committee-specific vote recommendations deal with the applicable committee chair rather than the entire committee (depending on the seriousness of the issue). However, in cases where we would ordinarily recommend voting against a committee chairman but the chair is not specified, we apply the following general rules, which apply throughout our guidelines: |
|
If there is no committee chair, we recommend voting against the longest-serving committee member or, if the longest-serving committee member cannot be determined, the longest-serving board member serving on the committee (i.e. in either case, the senior director); |
|
If there is no committee chair, but multiple senior directors serving on the committee, we recommend voting against both (or all) such senior directors. |
Public Company Executives and Excessive Board Memberships
|
We typically recommend voting against a director who serves as an executive officer of any public company while serving on more than two other public company boards. However, we will not recommend voting against the director at the company where he or she serves as an executive officer, only at the other public companies where he or she serves on the board. |
Equity-Based Compensation Plan Proposals
|
Weve added an item to our list of overarching principles on which we evaluate equity compensation plans, namely, that plans should not count shares in ways that understate the potential dilution, or cost, to common shareholders. This refers to inverse full-value award multipliers. |
Exclusive Forum Provisions
|
While our general approach to exclusive forum provisions remains unchangedthat we recommend that shareholders vote against any bylaw or charter amendment seeking to adopt such a provisionwe further explain that in certain cases we may support such a provision if the company: (i) provides a compelling argument on why the provision would directly benefit shareholders; (ii) provides evidence of abuse of legal process in other, non-favored jurisdictions; and (iii) maintains a strong record of good corporate governance practices. |
1
Real Estate Investment Trusts
|
Weve included a general section on REITs and our approach to evaluating preferred stock issuances at these firms. |
Business Development Companies
|
Weve included a new section on our approach to analyzing business development companies and requests to sell shares at prices below Net Asset Value. |
2
II. A BOARD OF DIRECTORS THAT SERVES THE INTERESTS OF SHAREHOLDERS
The purpose of Glass Lewis proxy research and advice is to facilitate shareholder voting in favor of governance structures that will drive performance, create shareholder value and maintain a proper tone at the top. Glass Lewis looks for talented boards with a record of protecting shareholders and delivering value over the medium- and long-term. We believe that boards working to protect and enhance the best interests of shareholders are independent, have directors with diverse backgrounds, have a record of positive performance, and have members with a breadth and depth of relevant experience.
The independence of directors, or lack thereof, is ultimately demonstrated through the decisions they make. In assessing the independence of directors, we will take into consideration, when appropriate, whether a director has a track record indicative of making objective decisions. Likewise, when assessing the independence of directors we will also examine when a directors service track record on multiple boards indicates a lack of objective decision-making. Ultimately, we believe the determination of whether a director is independent or not must take into consideration both compliance with the applicable independence listing requirements as well as judgments made by the director.
We look at each director nominee to examine the directors relationships with the company, the companys executives, and other directors. We do this to evaluate whether personal, familial, or financial relationships (not including director compensation) may impact the directors decisions. We believe that such relationships make it difficult for a director to put shareholders interests above the directors or the related partys interests. We also believe that a director who owns more than 20% of a company can exert disproportionate influence on the board and, in particular, the audit committee.
Thus, we put directors into three categories based on an examination of the type of relationship they have with the company:
Independent Director An independent director has no material financial, familial or other current relationships with the company, its executives, or other board members, except for board service and standard fees paid for that service. Relationships that existed within three to five years 1 before the inquiry are usually considered current for purposes of this test.
In our view, a director who is currently serving in an interim management position should be considered an insider, while a director who previously served in an interim management position for less than one year and is no longer serving in such capacity is considered independent. Moreover, a director who previously served in an interim management position for over one year and is no longer serving in such capacity is considered an affiliate for five years following the date of his/her resignation or departure from the interim management position. Glass Lewis applies a three-year look-back period to all directors who have an affiliation with the company other than former employment, for which we apply a five-year look-back.
1 |
NASDAQ originally proposed a five-year look-back period but both it and the NYSE ultimately settled on a three-year look-back prior to finalizing their rules. A five-year standard is more appropriate, in our view, because we believe that the unwinding of conflicting relationships between former management and board members is more likely to be complete and final after five years. However, Glass Lewis does not apply the five-year look-back period to directors who have previously served as executives of the company on an interim basis for less than one year. |
3
Affiliated Director An affiliated director has a material financial, familial or other relationship with the company or its executives, but is not an employee of the company. 2 This includes directors whose employers have a material financial relationship with the company. 3 In addition, we view a director who owns or controls 20% or more of the companys voting stock as an affiliate. 4
We view 20% shareholders as affiliates because they typically have access to and involvement with the management of a company that is fundamentally different from that of ordinary shareholders. More importantly, 20% holders may have interests that diverge from those of ordinary holders, for reasons such as the liquidity (or lack thereof) of their holdings, personal tax issues, etc.
Definition of Material: A material relationship is one in which the dollar value exceeds:
|
$50,000 (or where no amount is disclosed) for directors who are paid for a service they have agreed to perform for the company, outside of their service as a director, including professional or other services; or |
|
$120,000 (or where no amount is disclosed) for those directors employed by a professional services firm such as a law firm, investment bank, or consulting firm where the company pays the firm, not the individual, for services. This dollar limit would also apply to charitable contributions to schools where a board member is a professor; or charities where a director serves on the board or is an executive; 5 and any aircraft and real estate dealings between the company and the directors firm; or |
|
1% of either companys consolidated gross revenue for other business relation-ships (e.g., where the director is an executive officer of a company that provides services or products to or receives services or products from the company). 6 |
Definition of Familial: Familial relationships include a persons spouse, parents, children, siblings, grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, nieces, nephews, in-laws, and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares such persons home. A director is an affiliate if the director has a family member who is employed by the company and who receives compensation of $120,000 or more per year or the compensation is not disclosed.
Definition of Company: A company includes any parent or subsidiary in a group with the company or any entity that merged with, was acquired by, or acquired the company.
Inside Director An inside director simultaneously serves as a director and as an employee of the company. This category may include a chairman of the board who acts as an employee of the company or is paid as an employee of the company. In our view, an inside director who derives a greater amount of income as a result of affiliated transactions with the company rather than through compensation paid by the company (i.e., salary, bonus, etc. as a company employee) faces a conflict between making decisions that are in the best interests of the company versus those in the directors own best interests. Therefore, we will recommend voting against such a director.
2 |
If a company classifies one of its non-employee directors as non-independent, Glass Lewis will classify that director as an affiliate. |
3 |
We allow a five-year grace period for former executives of the company or merged companies who have consulting agreements with the surviving company. (We do not automatically recommend voting against directors in such cases for the first five years.) If the consulting agreement persists after this five-year grace period, we apply the materiality thresholds outlined in the definition of material. |
4 |
This includes a director who serves on a board as a representative (as part of his or her basic responsibilities) of an investment firm with greater than 20% ownership. However, while we will generally consider him/her to be affiliated, we will not recommend voting against unless (i) the investment firm has disproportionate board representation or (ii) the director serves on the audit committee. |
5 |
We will generally take into consideration the size and nature of such charitable entities in relation to the companys size and industry along with any other relevant factors such as the directors role at the charity. However, unlike for other types of related party transactions, Glass Lewis generally does not apply a look-back period to affiliated relationships involving charitable contributions; if the relationship ceases, we will consider the director to be independent. |
6 |
This includes cases where a director is employed by, or closely affiliated with, a private equity firm that profits from an acquisition made by the company. Unless disclosure suggests otherwise, we presume the director is affiliated. |
4
VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE BASIS OF BOARD INDEPENDENCE
Glass Lewis believes a board will be most effective in protecting shareholders interests if it is at least two-thirds independent. We note that each of the Business Roundtable, the Conference Board, and the Council of Institutional Investors advocates that two-thirds of the board be independent. Where more than one-third of the members are affiliated or inside directors, we typically 7 recommend voting against some of the inside and/or affiliated directors in order to satisfy the two-thirds threshold.
In the case of a less than two-thirds independent board, Glass Lewis strongly supports the existence of a presiding or lead director with authority to set the meeting agendas and to lead sessions outside the insider chairmans presence.
In addition, we scrutinize avowedly independent chairmen and lead directors. We believe that they should be unquestionably independent or the company should not tout them as such.
COMMITTEE INDEPENDENCE
We believe that only independent directors should serve on a companys audit, compensation, nominating, and governance committees. 8 We typically recommend that shareholders vote against any affiliated or inside director seeking appointment to an audit, compensation, nominating, or governance committee, or who has served in that capacity in the past year.
INDEPENDENT CHAIRMAN
Glass Lewis believes that separating the roles of CEO (or, more rarely, another executive position) and chairman creates a better governance structure than a combined CEO/chairman position. An executive manages the business according to a course the board charts. Executives should report to the board regarding their performance in achieving goals the board set. This is needlessly complicated when a CEO chairs the board, since a CEO/chairman presumably will have a significant influence over the board.
It can become difficult for a board to fulfill its role of overseer and policy setter when a CEO/chairman controls the agenda and the boardroom discussion. Such control can allow a CEO to have an entrenched position, leading to longer-than-optimal terms, fewer checks on management, less scrutiny of the business operation, and limitations on independent, shareholder-focused goal-setting by the board.
A CEO should set the strategic course for the company, with the boards approval, and the board should enable the CEO to carry out the CEOs vision for accomplishing the boards objectives. Failure to achieve the boards objectives should lead the board to replace that CEO with someone in whom the board has confidence.
Likewise, an independent chairman can better oversee executives and set a pro-shareholder agenda without the management conflicts that a CEO and other executive insiders often face. Such oversight and concern for shareholders allows for a more proactive and effective board of directors that is better able to look out for the interests of shareholders.
Further, it is the boards responsibility to select a chief executive who can best serve a company and its shareholders and to replace this person when his or her duties have not been appropriately fulfilled. Such a replacement becomes more difficult and happens less frequently when the chief executive is also in the position of overseeing the board.
Glass Lewis believes that the installation of an independent chairman is almost always a positive step from a corporate governance perspective and promotes the best interests of shareholders. Further,
7 |
With a staggered board, if the affiliates or insiders that we believe should not be on the board are not up for election, we will express our concern regarding those directors, but we will not recommend voting against the other affiliates or insiders who are up for election just to achieve two-thirds independence. However, we will consider recommending vot-ing against the directors subject to our concern at their next election if the concerning issue is not resolved. |
8 |
We will recommend voting against an audit committee member who owns 20% or more of the companys stock, and we believe that there should be a maximum of one director (or no directors if the committee is comprised of less than three directors) who owns 20% or more of the companys stock on the compensation, nominating, and governance committees. |
5
the presence of an independent chairman fosters the creation of a thoughtful and dynamic board, not dominated by the views of senior management. Encouragingly, many companies appear to be moving in this directionone study even indicates that less than 12 percent of incoming CEOs in 2009 were awarded the chairman title, versus 48 percent as recently as 2002. 9 Another study finds that 41 percent of S&P 500 boards now separate the CEO and chairman roles, up from 26 percent in 2001, although the same study found that of those companies, only 21 percent have truly independent chairs. 10
We do not recommend that shareholders vote against CEOs who chair the board. However, we typically encourage our clients to support separating the roles of chairman and CEO whenever that question is posed in a proxy (typically in the form of a shareholder proposal), as we believe that it is in the long-term best interests of the company and its shareholders.
The most crucial test of a boards commitment to the company and its shareholders lies in the actions of the board and its members. We look at the performance of these individuals as directors and executives of the company and of other companies where they have served.
VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE BASIS OF PERFORMANCE
We disfavor directors who have a record of not fulfilling their responsibilities to shareholders at any company where they have held a board or executive position. We typically recommend voting against:
1. |
A director who fails to attend a minimum of 75% of board and applicable committee meetings, calculated in the aggregate. 11 |
2. |
A director who belatedly filed a significant form(s) 4 or 5, or who has a pattern of late filings if the late filing was the directors fault (we look at these late filing situations on a case-by-case basis). |
3. |
A director who is also the CEO of a company where a serious and material restatement has occurred after the CEO had previously certified the pre-restatement financial statements. |
4. |
A director who has received two against recommendations from Glass Lewis for identical reasons within the prior year at different companies (the same situation must also apply at the company being analyzed). |
5. |
All directors who served on the board if, for the last three years, the companys performance has been in the bottom quartile of the sector and the directors have not taken reasonable steps to address the poor performance. |
BOARD RESPONSIVENESS TO A SIGNIFICANT SHAREHOLDER VOTE
Glass Lewis believes that any time 25% or more of shareholders vote against the recommendation of management, the board should demonstrate some level of engagement and responsiveness to address the shareholder concerns. These include instances when 25% or more of shareholders (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes): WITHOLD votes from (or vote AGAINST) a director nominee, vote AGAINST a management-sponsored proposal, or vote FOR a shareholder proposal. In our view, a 25% threshold is significant enough to warrant a close examination of the underlying issues and an evaluation of whether or not the board responded appropriately following the vote. While the 25% threshold alone will not automatically generate a negative vote recommendation from Glass Lewis on a future proposal (e.g. to recommend against a director nominee, against a say-on-pay proposal, etc.), it will bolster our argument to vote against managements recommendation in the event we determine that the board did not respond appropriately.
9 |
Ken Favaro, Per-Ola Karlsson and Gary Neilson. CEO Succession 2000-2009: A Decade of Convergence and Compression. Booz & Company (from Strategy+Business, Issue 59, Summer 2010). |
10 |
Spencer Stuart Board Index, 2011, p. 6 |
11 |
However, where a director has served for less than one full year, we will typically not recommend voting against for failure to attend 75% of meetings. Rather, we will note the poor attendance with a recommendation to track this issue going forward. We will also refrain from recommending to vote against directors when the proxy discloses that the director missed the meetings due to serious illness or other extenuating circumstances. |
6
As a general framework, our evaluation of board responsiveness involves a review of publicly available disclosures (e.g. the proxy statement, annual report, 8-Ks, company website, etc.) released following the date of the companys last annual meeting up through the publication date of our most current Proxy Paper. Depending on the specific issue, our focus typically includes, but is not limited to, the following:
|
At the board level, any changes in directorships, committee memberships, disclosure of related party transactions, meeting attendance, or other responsibilities. |
|
Any revisions made to the companys articles of incorporation, bylaws or other governance documents. |
|
Any press or news releases indicating changes in, or the adoption of, new company policies, business practices or special reports. |
|
Any modifications made to the design and structure of the companys compensation program. |
Our Proxy Paper analysis will include a case-by-case assessment of the specific elements of board responsiveness that we examined along with an explanation of how that assessment impacts our current vote recommendations.
THE ROLE OF A COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN
Glass Lewis believes that a designated committee chairman maintains primary responsibility for the actions of his or her respective committee. As such, many of our committee-specific vote recommendations deal with the applicable committee chair rather than the entire committee (depending on the seriousness of the issue). However, in cases where we would ordinarily recommend voting against a committee chairman but the chair is not specified, we apply the following general rules, which apply throughout our guidelines:
|
If there is no committee chair, we recommend voting against the longest-serving committee member or, if the longest-serving committee member cannot be determined, the longest-serving board member serving on the committee (i.e. in either case, the senior director); |
|
If there is no committee chair, but multiple senior directors serving on the committee, we recommend voting against both (or all) such senior directors. |
In our view, companies should provide clear disclosure of which director is charged with overseeing each committee. So in cases where that simple framework is ignored and a reasonable analysis cannot determine which committee member is the designated leader, we believe shareholder action against the longest serving committee member(s) is warranted. Again, this only applies if we would ordinarily recommend voting against the committee chair but there is either no such position or no designated director in such role.
On the contrary, in cases where there is a designated committee chair and the recommendation is to vote against the committee chair but the chair is not up for election because the board is staggered, we do not recommend voting against any members of the committee who are up for election; rather, we will simply express our concern with regard to the committee chair.
AUDIT COMMITTEES AND PERFORMANCE
Audit committees play an integral role in overseeing the financial reporting process because [v] ibrant and stable capital markets depend on, among other things, reliable, transparent, and objective financial information to support an efficient and effective capital market process. The vital oversight role audit committees play in the process of producing financial information has never been more important. 12
12 |
Audit Committee Effectiveness What Works Best. PricewaterhouseCoopers. The Institute of Internal Auditors Re-search Foundation. 2005. |
7
When assessing an audit committees performance, we are aware that an audit committee does not prepare financial statements, is not responsible for making the key judgments and assumptions that affect the financial statements, and does not audit the numbers or the disclosures provided to investors. Rather, an audit committee member monitors and oversees the process and procedures that management and auditors perform. The 1999 Report and Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees stated it best:
A proper and well-functioning system exists, therefore, when the three main groups responsible for financial reporting the full board including the audit committee, financial management including the internal auditors, and the outside auditors form a three legged stool that supports responsible financial disclosure and active participatory oversight. However, in the view of the Committee, the audit committee must be first among equals in this process, since the audit committee is an extension of the full board and hence the ultimate monitor of the process.
STANDARDS FOR ASSESSING THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
For an audit committee to function effectively on investors behalf, it must include members with sufficient knowledge to diligently carry out their responsibilities. In its audit and accounting recommendations, the Conference Board Commission on Public Trust and Private Enterprise said members of the audit committee must be independent and have both knowledge and experience in auditing financial matters. 13
We are skeptical of audit committees where there are members that lack expertise as a Certified Public Accountant (CPA), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) or corporate controller or similar experience. While we will not necessarily vote against members of an audit committee when such expertise is lacking, we are more likely to vote against committee members when a problem such as a restatement occurs and such expertise is lacking.
Glass Lewis generally assesses audit committees against the decisions they make with respect to their oversight and monitoring role. The quality and integrity of the financial statements and earnings reports, the completeness of disclosures necessary for investors to make informed decisions, and the effectiveness of the internal controls should provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements are materially free from errors. The independence of the external auditors and the results of their work all provide useful information by which to assess the audit committee.
When assessing the decisions and actions of the audit committee, we typically defer to its judgment and would vote in favor of its members, but we would recommend voting against the following members under the following circumstances: 14
1. |
All members of the audit committee when options were backdated, there is a lack of adequate controls in place, there was a resulting restatement, and disclosures indicate there was a lack of documentation with respect to the option grants. |
2. |
The audit committee chair, if the audit committee does not have a financial expert or the committees financial expert does not have a demonstrable financial background sufficient to understand the financial issues unique to public companies. |
3. |
The audit committee chair, if the audit committee did not meet at least 4 times during the year. |
4. |
The audit committee chair, if the committee has less than three members. |
5. |
Any audit committee member who sits on more than three public company audit committees, unless the audit committee member is a retired CPA, CFO, controller or has similar experience, in which case the limit shall be four committees, taking time and availability into consideration including a review of the audit committee members attendance at all board and committee meetings. 15 |
13 |
Commission on Public Trust and Private Enterprise. The Conference Board. 2003. |
14 |
As discussed under the section labeled Committee Chairman, where the recommendation is to vote against the committee chair but the chair is not up for election because the board is staggered, we do not recommend voting against the members of the committee who are up for election; rather, we will simply express our concern with regard to the committee chair. |
15 |
Glass Lewis may exempt certain audit committee members from the above threshold if, upon further analysis of relevant factors such as the directors experience, the size, industry-mix and location of the companies involved and the directors attendance at all the companies, we can reasonably determine that the audit committee member is likely not hindered by multiple audit committee commitments. |
8
6. |
All members of an audit committee who are up for election and who served on the committee at the time of the audit, if audit and audit-related fees total one-third or less of the total fees billed by the auditor. |
7. |
The audit committee chair when tax and/or other fees are greater than audit and audit-related fees paid to the auditor for more than one year in a row (in which case we also recommend against ratification of the auditor). |
8. |
All members of an audit committee where non-audit fees include fees for tax services (including, but not limited to, such things as tax avoidance or shelter schemes) for senior executives of the company. Such services are now prohibited by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). |
9. |
All members of an audit committee that reappointed an auditor that we no longer consider to be independent for reasons unrelated to fee proportions. |
10. |
All members of an audit committee when audit fees are excessively low, especially when compared with other companies in the same industry. |
11. |
The audit committee chair 16 if the committee failed to put auditor ratification on the ballot for shareholder approval. However, if the non-audit fees or tax fees exceed audit plus audit-related fees in either the current or the prior year, then Glass Lewis will recommend voting against the entire audit committee. |
12. |
All members of an audit committee where the auditor has resigned and reported that a section 10A 17 letter has been issued. |
13. |
All members of an audit committee at a time when material accounting fraud occurred at the company. 18 |
14. |
All members of an audit committee at a time when annual and/or multiple quarterly financial statements had to be restated, and any of the following factors apply: |
|
The restatement involves fraud or manipulation by insiders; |
|
The restatement is accompanied by an SEC inquiry or investigation; |
|
The restatement involves revenue recognition; |
|
The restatement results in a greater than 5% adjustment to costs of goods sold, operating expense, or operating cash flows; or |
|
The restatement results in a greater than 5% adjustment to net income, 10% adjustment to assets or shareholders equity, or cash flows from financing or investing activities. |
16 |
As discussed under the section labeled Committee Chairman, in all cases, if the chair of the committee is not specified, we recommend voting against the director who has been on the committee the longest. |
17 |
Auditors are required to report all potential illegal acts to management and the audit committee unless they are clearly inconsequential in nature. If the audit committee or the board fails to take appropriate action on an act that has been determined to be a violation of the law, the independent auditor is required to send a section 10A letter to the SEC. Such letters are rare and therefore we believe should be taken seriously. |
18 |
Recent research indicates that revenue fraud now accounts for over 60% of SEC fraud cases, and that companies that engage in fraud experience significant negative abnormal stock price declinesfacing bankruptcy, delisting, and material asset sales at much higher rates than do non-fraud firms (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Fraudulent Financial Reporting: 1998-2007. May 2010). |
9
15. |
All members of an audit committee if the company repeatedly fails to file its financial reports in a timely fashion. For example, the company has filed two or more quarterly or annual financial statements late within the last 5 quarters. |
16. |
All members of an audit committee when it has been disclosed that a law enforcement agency has charged the company and/or its employees with a violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). |
17. |
All members of an audit committee when the company has aggressive accounting policies and/ or poor disclosure or lack of sufficient transparency in its financial statements. |
18. |
All members of the audit committee when there is a disagreement with the auditor and the auditor resigns or is dismissed (e.g. the company receives an adverse opinion on its financial statements from the auditor) |
19. |
All members of the audit committee if the contract with the auditor specifically limits the auditors liability to the company for damages. 19 |
20. |
All members of the audit committee who served since the date of the companys last annual meeting, and when, since the last annual meeting, the company has reported a material weakness that has not yet been corrected, or, when the company has an ongoing material weakness from a prior year that has not yet been corrected. |
We also take a dim view of audit committee reports that are boilerplate, and which provide little or no information or transparency to investors. When a problem such as a material weakness, restatement or late filings occurs, we take into consideration, in forming our judgment with respect to the audit committee, the transparency of the audit committee report.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE PERFORMANCE
Compensation committees have the final say in determining the compensation of executives. This includes deciding the basis on which compensation is determined, as well as the amounts and types of compensation to be paid. This process begins with the hiring and initial establishment of employment agreements, including the terms for such items as pay, pensions and severance arrangements. It is important in establishing compensation arrangements that compensation be consistent with, and based on the long-term economic performance of, the businesss long-term shareholders returns.
Compensation committees are also responsible for the oversight of the transparency of compensation. This oversight includes disclosure of compensation arrangements, the matrix used in assessing pay for performance, and the use of compensation consultants. In order to ensure the independence of the compensation consultant, we believe the compensation committee should only engage a compensation consultant that is not also providing any services to the company or management apart from their contract with the compensation committee. It is important to investors that they have clear and complete disclosure of all the significant terms of compensation arrangements in order to make informed decisions with respect to the oversight and decisions of the compensation committee.
Finally, compensation committees are responsible for oversight of internal controls over the executive compensation process. This includes controls over gathering information used to determine compensation, establishment of equity award plans, and granting of equity awards. Lax controls can and have contributed to conflicting information being obtained, for example through the use of nonobjective consultants. Lax controls can also contribute to improper awards of compensation such as through granting of backdated or spring-loaded options, or granting of bonuses when triggers for bonus payments have not been met.
Central to understanding the actions of a compensation committee is a careful review of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) report included in each companys proxy. We review
19 |
The Council of Institutional Investors. Corporate Governance Policies, p. 4, April 5, 2006; and Letter from Council of Institutional Investors to the AICPA, November 8, 2006. |
10
the CD&A in our evaluation of the overall compensation practices of a company, as overseen by the compensation committee. The CD&A is also integral to the evaluation of compensation proposals at companies, such as advisory votes on executive compensation, which allow shareholders to vote on the compensation paid to a companys top executives.
When assessing the performance of compensation committees, we will recommend voting against for the following: 20
1. |
All members of the compensation committee who are up for election and served at the time of poor pay-for-performance (e.g., a company receives an F grade in our pay-for-performance analysis) when shareholders are not provided with an advisory vote on executive compensation at the annual meeting. 21 |
2. |
Any member of the compensation committee who has served on the compensation committee of at least two other public companies that received F grades in our pay-for-performance model and who is also suspect at the company in question. |
3. |
The compensation committee chair if the company received two D grades in consecutive years in our pay-for-performance analysis, and if during the past year the Company performed the same as or worse than its peers. 22 |
4. |
All members of the compensation committee (during the relevant time period) if the company entered into excessive employment agreements and/or severance agreements. |
5. |
All members of the compensation committee when performance goals were changed (i.e., lowered) when employees failed or were unlikely to meet original goals, or performance-based compensation was paid despite goals not being attained. |
6. |
All members of the compensation committee if excessive employee perquisites and benefits were allowed. |
7. |
The compensation committee chair if the compensation committee did not meet during the year, but should have (e.g., because executive compensation was restructured or a new executive was hired). |
8. |
All members of the compensation committee when the company repriced options or completed a self tender offer without shareholder approval within the past two years. |
9. |
All members of the compensation committee when vesting of in-the-money options is accelerated or when fully vested options are granted. |
10. |
All members of the compensation committee when option exercise prices were backdated. Glass Lewis will recommend voting against an executive director who played a role in and participated in option backdating. |
11. |
All members of the compensation committee when option exercise prices were spring-loaded or otherwise timed around the release of material information. |
20 |
As discussed under the section labeled Committee Chairman, where the recommendation is to vote against the committee chair and the chair is not up for election because the board is staggered, we do not recommend voting against any members of the committee who are up for election; rather, we will simply express our concern with regard to the committee chair. |
21 |
Where there are multiple CEOs in one year, we will consider not recommending against the compensation committee but will defer judgment on compensation policies and practices until the next year or a full year after arrival of the new CEO. In addition, if a company provides shareholders with a say-on-pay proposal and receives an F grade in our pay-for-performance model, we will recommend that shareholders only vote against the say-on-pay proposal rather than the members of the compensation committee, unless the company exhibits egregious practices. However, if the company receives successive F grades, we will then recommend against the members of the compensation committee in addition to recommending voting against the say-on-pay proposal. |
22 |
In cases where the company received two D grades in consecutive years, but during the past year the company performed better than its peers or improved from an F to a D grade year over year, we refrain from recommending to vote against the compensation chair. In addition, if a company provides shareholders with a say-on-pay proposal in this instance, we will consider voting against the advisory vote rather than the compensation committee chair unless the company exhibits unquestionably egregious practices. |
11
12. |
All members of the compensation committee when a new employment contract is given to an executive that does not include a clawback provision and the company had a material restatement, especially if the restatement was due to fraud. |
13. |
The chair of the compensation committee where the CD&A provides insufficient or unclear information about performance metrics and goals, where the CD&A indicates that pay is not tied to performance, or where the compensation committee or management has excessive discretion to alter performance terms or increase amounts of awards in contravention of previously defined targets. |
14. |
All members of the compensation committee during whose tenure the committee failed to implement a shareholder proposal regarding a compensation-related issue, where the proposal received the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting shares at a shareholder meeting, and when a reasonable analysis suggests that the compensation committee (rather than the governance committee) should have taken steps to implement the request. 23 |
15. |
All members of a compensation committee during whose tenure the committee failed to address shareholder concerns following majority shareholder rejection of the say-on-pay proposal in the previous year. Where the proposal was approved but there was a significant shareholder vote (i.e., greater than 25% of votes cast) against the say-on-pay proposal in the prior year, if there is no evidence that the board responded accordingly to the vote including actively engaging shareholders on this issue, we will also consider recommending voting against the chairman of the compensation committee or all members of the compensation committee, depending on the severity and history of the compensation problems and the level of vote against. |
NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE PERFORMANCE
The nominating and governance committee, as an agency for the shareholders, is responsible for the governance by the board of the company and its executives. In performing this role, the board is responsible and accountable for selection of objective and competent board members. It is also responsible for providing leadership on governance policies adopted by the company, such as decisions to implement shareholder proposals that have received a majority vote.
Consistent with Glass Lewis philosophy that boards should have diverse backgrounds and members with a breadth and depth of relevant experience, we believe that nominating and governance committees should consider diversity when making director nominations within the context of each specific company and its industry. In our view, shareholders are best served when boards make an effort to ensure a constituency that is not only reasonably diverse on the basis of age, race, gender and ethnicity, but also on the basis of geographic knowledge, industry experience and culture.
Regarding the nominating and or governance committee, we will recommend voting against the following: 24
1. |
All members of the governance committee 25 during whose tenure the board failed to implement a shareholder proposal with a direct and substantial impact on shareholders and their rights - i.e., where the proposal received enough shareholder votes (at least a majority) to allow the board to implement or begin to implement that proposal. 26 Examples of these types of shareholder proposals are majority vote to elect directors and to declassify the board. |
23 |
In all other instances (i.e. a non-compensation-related shareholder proposal should have been implemented) we recommend that shareholders vote against the members of the governance committee. |
24 |
As discussed in the guidelines section labeled Committee Chairman, where we would recommend to vote against the committee chair but the chair is not up for election because the board is staggered, we do not recommend voting against any members of the committee who are up for election; rather, we will simply express our concern regarding the committee chair. |
25 |
If the board does not have a governance committee (or a committee that serves such a purpose), we recommend voting against the entire board on this basis. |
26 |
Where a compensation-related shareholder proposal should have been implemented, and when a reasonable analysis suggests that the members of the compensation committee (rather than the governance committee) bear the responsibility for failing to implement the request, we recommend that shareholders only vote against members of the compensation committee. |
12
2. |
The governance committee chair, 27 when the chairman is not independent and an independent lead or presiding director has not been appointed. 28 |
3. |
In the absence of a nominating committee, the governance committee chair when there are less than five or the whole nominating committee when there are more than 20 members on the board. |
4. |
The governance committee chair, when the committee fails to meet at all during the year. |
5. |
The governance committee chair, when for two consecutive years the company provides what we consider to be inadequate related party transaction disclosure (i.e. the nature of such transactions and/or the monetary amounts involved are unclear or excessively vague, thereby preventing an average shareholder from being able to reasonably interpret the independence status of multiple directors above and beyond what the company maintains is compliant with SEC or applicable stock-exchange listing requirements). |
6. |
The governance committee chair, when during the past year the board adopted a forum selection clause (i.e. an exclusive forum provision) 29 without shareholder approval, or, if the board is currently seeking shareholder approval of a forum selection clause pursuant to a bundled bylaw amendment rather than as a separate proposal. |
Regarding the nominating committee, we will recommend voting against the following: 30
1. |
All members of the nominating committee, when the committee nominated or renominated an individual who had a significant conflict of interest or whose past actions demonstrated a lack of integrity or inability to represent shareholder interests. |
2. |
The nominating committee chair, if the nominating committee did not meet during the year, but should have (i.e., because new directors were nominated or appointed since the time of the last annual meeting). |
3. |
In the absence of a governance committee, the nominating committee chair 31 when the chairman is not independent, and an independent lead or presiding director has not been appointed. 32 |
4. |
The nominating committee chair, when there are less than five or the whole nominating committee when there are more than 20 members on the board. 33 |
5. |
The nominating committee chair, when a director received a greater than 50% against vote the prior year and not only was the director not removed, but the issues that raised shareholder concern were not corrected. 34 |
27 |
As discussed in the guidelines section labeled Committee Chairman, if the committee chair is not specified, we recommend voting against the director who has been on the committee the longest. If the longest-serving committee member cannot be determined, we will recommend voting against the longest-serving board member serving on the committee. |
28 |
We believe that one independent individual should be appointed to serve as the lead or presiding director. When such a position is rotated among directors from meeting to meeting, we will recommend voting against as if there were no lead or presiding director. |
29 |
A forum selection clause is a bylaw provision stipulating that a certain state, typically Delaware, shall be the exclusive forum for all intra-corporate disputes (e.g. shareholder derivative actions, assertions of claims of a breach of fiduciary duty, etc.). Such a clause effectively limits a shareholders legal remedy regarding appropriate choice of venue and related relief offered under that states laws and rulings. |
30 |
As discussed in the guidelines section labeled Committee Chairman, where we would recommend to vote against the committee chair but the chair is not up for election because the board is staggered, we do not recommend voting against any members of the committee who are up for election; rather, we will simply express our concern regarding the committee chair. |
31 |
As discussed under the section labeled Committee Chairman, if the committee chair is not specified, we will recommend voting against the director who has been on the committee the longest. If the longest-serving committee member cannot be determined, we will recommend voting against the longest-serving board member on the committee. |
32 |
In the absence of both a governance and a nominating committee, we will recommend voting against the chairman of the board on this basis, unless if the chairman also serves as the CEO, in which case we will recommend voting against the director who has served on the board the longest. |
33 |
In the absence of both a governance and a nominating committee, we will recommend voting against the chairman of the board on this basis, unless if the chairman also serves as the CEO, in which case we will recommend voting against the director who has served on the board the longest. |
34 |
Considering that shareholder discontent clearly relates to the director who received a greater than 50% against vote rather than the nominating chair, we review the validity of the issue(s) that initially raised shareholder concern, follow-up on such matters, and only recommend voting against the nominating chair if a reasonable analysis suggests that it would be most appropriate. In rare cases, we will consider recommending against the nominating chair when a director receives a substantial (i.e., 25% or more) vote against based on the same analysis. |
13
BOARD-LEVEL RISK MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT
Glass Lewis evaluates the risk management function of a public company board on a strictly case-by-case basis. Sound risk management, while necessary at all companies, is particularly important at financial firms which inherently maintain significant exposure to financial risk. We believe such financial firms should have a chief risk officer reporting directly to the board and a dedicated risk committee or a committee of the board charged with risk oversight. Moreover, many non-financial firms maintain strategies which involve a high level of exposure to financial risk. Similarly, since many non-financial firms have significant hedging or trading strategies, including financial and non-financial derivatives, those firms should also have a chief risk officer and a risk committee.
Our views on risk oversight are consistent with those expressed by various regulatory bodies. In its December 2009 Final Rule release on Proxy Disclosure Enhancements, the SEC noted that risk oversight is a key competence of the board and that additional disclosures would improve investor and shareholder understanding of the role of the board in the organizations risk management practices. The final rules, which became effective on February 28, 2010, now explicitly require companies and mutual funds to describe (while allowing for some degree of flexibility) the boards role in the oversight of risk.
When analyzing the risk management practices of public companies, we take note of any significant losses or writedowns on financial assets and/or structured transactions. In cases where a company has disclosed a sizable loss or writedown, and where we find that the companys board-level risk committee contributed to the loss through poor oversight, we would recommend that shareholders vote against such committee members on that basis. In addition, in cases where a company maintains a significant level of financial risk exposure but fails to disclose any explicit form of board-level risk oversight (committee or otherwise) 35 , we will consider recommending to vote against the chairman of the board on that basis. However, we generally would not recommend voting against a combined chairman/CEO except in egregious cases.
We find that a directors past conduct is often indicative of future conduct and performance. We often find directors with a history of overpaying executives or of serving on boards where avoidable disasters have occurred appearing at companies that follow these same patterns. Glass Lewis has a proprietary database of directors serving at over 8,000 of the most widely held U.S. companies. We use this database to track the performance of directors across companies.
Voting Recommendations on the Basis of Director Experience
We typically recommend that shareholders vote against directors who have served on boards or as executives of companies with records of poor performance, inadequate risk oversight, overcompensation, audit- or accounting-related issues, and/or other indicators of mismanagement or actions against the interests of shareholders. 36
Likewise, we examine the backgrounds of those who serve on key board committees to ensure that they have the required skills and diverse backgrounds to make informed judgments about the subject matter for which the committee is responsible.
In addition to the three key characteristics independence, performance, experience that we use to evaluate board members, we consider conflict-of-interest issues as well as the size of the board of directors when making voting recommendations.
35 |
A committee responsible for risk management could be a dedicated risk committee, or another board committee, usually the audit committee but occasionally the finance committee, depending on a given companys board structure and method of disclosure. At some companies, the entire board is charged with risk management. |
36 |
We typically apply a three-year look-back to such issues and also research to see whether the responsible directors have been up for election since the time of the failure, and if so, we take into account the percentage of support they received from shareholders. |
14
Conflicts of Interest
We believe board members should be wholly free of identifiable and substantial conflicts of interest, regardless of the overall level of independent directors on the board. Accordingly, we recommend that shareholders vote against the following types of affiliated or inside directors:
1. |
A CFO who is on the board: In our view, the CFO holds a unique position relative to financial reporting and disclosure to shareholders. Because of the critical importance of financial disclosure and reporting, we believe the CFO should report to the board and not be a member of it. |
2. |
A director who is on an excessive number of boards: We will typically recommend voting against a director who serves as an executive officer of any public company while serving on more than two other public company boards and any other director who serves on more than six public company boards typically receives an against recommendation from Glass Lewis. 37 Academic literature suggests that one board takes up approximately 200 hours per year of each members time. We believe this limits the number of boards on which directors can effectively serve, especially executives at other companies. 38 Further, we note a recent study has shown that the average number of outside board seats held by CEOs of S&P 500 companies is 0.6, down from 0.8 in 2006 and 1.2 in 2001. 39 |
3. |
A director, or a director who has an immediate family member, providing material consulting or other material professional services to the company: These services may include legal, consulting, or financial services. We question the need for the company to have consulting relationships with its directors. We view such relationships as creating conflicts for directors, since they may be forced to weigh their own interests against shareholder interests when making board decisions. In addition, a companys decisions regarding where to turn for the best professional services may be compromised when doing business with the professional services firm of one of the companys directors. |
4. |
A director, or a director who has an immediate family member, engaging in airplane, real estate, or similar deals, including perquisite-type grants from the company, amounting to more than $50,000: Directors who receive these sorts of payments from the company will have to make unnecessarily complicated decisions that may pit their interests against shareholder interests. |
5. |
Interlocking directorships: CEOs or other top executives who serve on each others boards create an interlock that poses conflicts that should be avoided to ensure the promotion of shareholder interests above all else. 40 |
6. |
All board members who served at a time when a poison pill was adopted without shareholder approval within the prior twelve months. 41 In the event a board is classified and shareholders are therefore unable to vote against all directors, we will recommend voting against the remaining directors the next year they are up for a shareholder vote. |
37 |
Glass Lewis will not recommend voting against the director at the company where he or she serves as an executive officer, only at the other public companies where he or she serves on the board. |
38 |
Our guidelines are similar to the standards set forth by the NACD in its Report of the NACD Blue Ribbon Commission on Director Professionalism, 2001 Edition, pp. 14-15 (also cited approvingly by the Conference Board in its Corporate Governance Best Practices: A Blueprint for the Post-Enron Era, 2002, p. 17), which suggested that CEOs should not serve on more than 2 additional boards, persons with full-time work should not serve on more than 4 additional boards, and others should not serve on more than six boards. |
39 |
Spencer Stuart Board Index, 2011, p. 8. |
40 |
We do not apply a look-back period for this situation. The interlock policy applies to both public and private companies. We will also evaluate multiple board interlocks among non-insiders (i.e. multiple directors serving on the same boards at other companies), for evidence of a pattern of poor oversight. |
41 |
Refer to Section V. Governance Structure and the Shareholder Franchise for further discussion of our policies regarding anti-takeover measures, including poison pills. |
15
Size of the Board of Directors
While we do not believe there is a universally applicable optimum board size, we do believe boards should have at least five directors to ensure sufficient diversity in decision-making and to enable the formation of key board committees with independent directors. Conversely, we believe that boards with more than 20 members will typically suffer under the weight of too many cooks in the kitchen and have difficulty reaching consensus and making timely decisions. Sometimes the presence of too many voices can make it difficult to draw on the wisdom and experience in the room by virtue of the need to limit the discussion so that each voice may be heard.
To that end, we typically recommend voting against the chairman of the nominating committee at a board with fewer than five directors. With boards consisting of more than 20 directors, we typically recommend voting against all members of the nominating committee (or the governance committee, in the absence of a nominating committee). 42
Controlled companies present an exception to our independence recommendations. The boards function is to protect shareholder interests; however, when an individual or entity owns more than 50% of the voting shares, the interests of the majority of shareholders are the interests of that entity or individual. Consequently, Glass Lewis does not apply our usual two-thirds independence rule and therefore we will not recommend voting against boards whose composition reflects the makeup of the shareholder population.
Independence Exceptions
The independence exceptions that we make for controlled companies are as follows:
1. |
We do not require that controlled companies have boards that are at least two-thirds independent. So long as the insiders and/or affiliates are connected with the controlling entity, we accept the presence of non-independent board members. |
2. |
The compensation committee and nominating and governance committees do not need to consist solely of independent directors. |
|
We believe that standing nominating and corporate governance committees at controlled companies are unnecessary. Although having a committee charged with the duties of searching for, selecting, and nominating independent directors can be beneficial, the unique composition of a controlled companys shareholder base makes such committees weak and irrelevant. |
|
Likewise, we believe that independent compensation committees at controlled companies are unnecessary. Although independent directors are the best choice for approving and monitoring senior executives pay, controlled companies serve a unique shareholder population whose voting power ensures the protection of its interests. As such, we believe that having affiliated directors on a controlled companys compensation committee is acceptable. However, given that a controlled company has certain obligations to minority shareholders we feel that an insider should not serve on the compensation committee. Therefore, Glass Lewis will recommend voting against any insider (the CEO or otherwise) serving on the compensation committee. |
3. |
Controlled companies do not need an independent chairman or an independent lead or presiding director. Although an independent director in a position of authority on the board such as chairman or presiding director can best carry out the boards duties, controlled companies serve a unique shareholder population whose voting power ensures the protection of its interests. |
42 |
The Conference Board, at p. 23 in its May 2003 report Corporate Governance Best Practices, Id., quotes one of its roundtable participants as stating, [w]hen youve got a 20 or 30 person corporate board, its one way of assuring that nothing is ever going to happen that the CEO doesnt want to happen. |
16
Size of the Board of Directors
We have no board size requirements for controlled companies.
Audit Committee Independence
We believe that audit committees should consist solely of independent directors. Regardless of a companys controlled status, the interests of all shareholders must be protected by ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the companys financial statements. Allowing affiliated directors to oversee the preparation of financial reports could create an insurmountable conflict of interest.
UNOFFICIALLY CONTROLLED COMPANIES AND 20-50% BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Where an individual or entity owns more than 50% of a companys voting power but the company is not a controlled company as defined by relevant listing standards, we apply a lower independence requirement of a majority of the board but believe the company should otherwise be treated like another public company; we will therefore apply all other standards as outlined above.
Similarly, where an individual or entity holds between 20-50% of a companys voting power, but the company is not controlled and there is not a majority owner, we believe it is reasonable to allow proportional representation on the board and committees (excluding the audit committee) based on the individual or entitys percentage of ownership.
We believe companies that have recently completed an initial public offering (IPO) should be allowed adequate time to fully comply with marketplace listing requirements as well as to meet basic corporate governance standards. We believe a one-year grace period immediately following the date of a companys IPO is sufficient time for most companies to comply with all relevant regulatory requirements and to meet such corporate governance standards. Except in egregious cases, Glass Lewis refrains from issuing voting recommendations on the basis of corporate governance best practices (eg. board independence, committee membership and structure, meeting attendance, etc.) during the one-year period following an IPO.
However, two specific cases warrant strong shareholder action against the board of a company that completed an IPO within the past year:
1. |
Adoption of a poison pill: in cases where a board implements a poison pill preceding an IPO, we will consider voting against the members of the board who served during the period of the poison pills adoption if the board (i) did not also commit to submit the poison pill to a shareholder vote within 12 months of the IPO or (ii) did not provide a sound rationale for adopting the pill and the pill does not expire in three years or less. In our view, adopting such an anti-takeover device unfairly penalizes future shareholders who (except for electing to buy or sell the stock) are unable to weigh in on a matter that could potentially negatively impact their ownership interest. This notion is strengthened when a board adopts a poison pill with a 5-10 year life immediately prior to having a public shareholder base so as to insulate management for a substantial amount of time while postponing and/or avoiding allowing public shareholders the ability to vote on the pills adoption. Such instances are indicative of boards that may subvert shareholders best interests following their IPO. |
2. |
Adoption of an exclusive forum provision: consistent with our general approach to boards that adopt exclusive forum provisions without shareholder approval (refer to our discussion of nominating and governance committee performance in Section I of the guidelines), in cases where a board adopts such a provision for inclusion in a companys charter or bylaws before the companys IPO, we will recommend voting against the chairman of the governance committee, or, in the absence of such a committee, the chairman of the board, who served during the period of time when the provision was adopted. |
17
Further, shareholders should also be wary of companies in this category that adopt supermajority voting requirements before their IPO. Absent explicit provisions in the articles or bylaws stipulating that certain policies will be phased out over a certain period of time (e.g. a predetermined declassification of the board, a planned separation of the chairman and CEO, etc.) long-term shareholders could find themselves in the predicament of having to attain a supermajority vote to approve future proposals seeking to eliminate such policies.
Mutual funds, or investment companies, are structured differently from regular public companies (i.e., operating companies). Typically, members of a funds adviser are on the board and management takes on a different role from that of regular public companies. Thus, we focus on a short list of requirements, although many of our guidelines remain the same.
The following mutual fund policies are similar to the policies for regular public companies:
1. |
Size of the board of directors: The board should be made up of between five and twenty directors. |
2. |
The CFO on the board: Neither the CFO of the fund nor the CFO of the funds registered investment adviser should serve on the board. |
3. |
Independence of the audit committee: The audit committee should consist solely of independent directors. |
4. |
Audit committee financial expert: At least one member of the audit committee should be designated as the audit committee financial expert. |
The following differences from regular public companies apply at mutual funds:
1. |
Independence of the board: We believe that three-fourths of an investment companys board should be made up of independent directors. This is consistent with a proposed SEC rule on investment company boards. The Investment Company Act requires 40% of the board to be independent, but in 2001, the SEC amended the Exemptive Rules to require that a majority of a mutual fund board be independent. In 2005, the SEC proposed increasing the independence threshold to 75%. In 2006, a federal appeals court ordered that this rule amendment be put back out for public comment, putting it back into proposed rule status. Since mutual fund boards play a vital role in overseeing the relationship between the fund and its investment manager, there is greater need for independent oversight than there is for an operating company board. |
2. |
When the auditor is not up for ratification: We do not recommend voting against the audit committee if the auditor is not up for ratification because, due to the different legal structure of an investment company compared to an operating company, the auditor for the investment company (i.e., mutual fund) does not conduct the same level of financial review for each investment company as for an operating company. |
3. |
Non-independent chairman: The SEC has proposed that the chairman of the fund board be independent. We agree that the roles of a mutual funds chairman and CEO should be separate. Although we believe this would be best at all companies, we recommend voting against the chairman of an investment companys nominating committee as well as the chairman of the board if the chairman and CEO of a mutual fund are the same person and the fund does not have an independent lead or presiding director. Seven former SEC commissioners support the appointment of an independent chairman and we agree with them that an independent board chairman would be better able to create conditions favoring the long-term interests of fund shareholders than would a chairman who is an executive of the adviser. (See the comment letter sent to the SEC in support of the proposed rule at http://sec.gov/rules/proposed/s70304/ s70304-179.pdf) |
18
4. |
Multiple funds overseen by the same director: Unlike service on a public company board, mutual fund boards require much less of a time commitment. Mutual fund directors typically serve on dozens of other mutual fund boards, often within the same fund complex. The Investment Company Institutes (ICI) Overview of Fund Governance Practices, 1994-2010, indicates that the average number of funds served by an independent director in 2010 was 49. Absent evidence that a specific director is hindered from being an effective board member at a fund due to service on other funds boards, we refrain from maintaining a cap on the number of outside mutual fund boards that we believe a director can serve on. |
Glass Lewis favors the repeal of staggered boards and the annual election of directors. We believe staggered boards are less accountable to shareholders than boards that are elected annually. Furthermore, we feel the annual election of directors encourages board members to focus on shareholder interests.
Empirical studies have shown: (i) companies with staggered boards reduce a firms value; and (ii) in the context of hostile takeovers, staggered boards operate as a takeover defense, which entrenches management, discourages potential acquirers, and delivers a lower return to target shareholders.
In our view, there is no evidence to demonstrate that staggered boards improve shareholder returns in a takeover context. Research shows that shareholders are worse off when a staggered board blocks a transaction. A study by a group of Harvard Law professors concluded that companies whose staggered boards prevented a takeover reduced shareholder returns for targets... on the order of eight to ten percent in the nine months after a hostile bid was announced. 43 When a staggered board negotiates a friendly transaction, no statistically significant difference in premiums occurs. 44 Further, one of those same professors found that charter-based staggered boards reduce the market value of a firm by 4% to 6% of its market capitalization and that staggered boards bring about and not merely reflect this reduction in market value. 45 A subsequent study reaffirmed that classified boards reduce shareholder value, finding that the ongoing process of dismantling staggered boards, encouraged by institutional investors, could well contribute to increasing shareholder wealth. 46
Shareholders have increasingly come to agree with this view. In 2011 more than 75% of S&P 500 companies had declassified boards, up from approximately 41% a decade ago. 47 Clearly, more shareholders have supported the repeal of classified boards. Resolutions relating to the repeal of staggered boards garnered on average over 70% support among shareholders in 2008, whereas in 1987, only 16.4% of votes cast favored board declassification. 48
Given the empirical evidence suggesting staggered boards reduce a companys value and the increasing shareholder opposition to such a structure, Glass Lewis supports the declassification of boards and the annual election of directors.
MANDATORY DIRECTOR TERM AND AGE LIMITS
Glass Lewis believes that director age and term limits typically are not in shareholders best interests. Too often age and term limits are used by boards as a crutch to remove board members who have served for an extended period of time. When used in that fashion, they are indicative of a board that has a difficult time making tough decisions.
43 |
Lucian Bebchuk, John Coates IV, Guhan Subramanian, The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Further Findings and a Reply to Symposium Participants, 55 Stanford Law Review 885-917 (2002), page 1. |
44 |
Id. at 2 (Examining a sample of seventy-three negotiated transactions from 2000 to 2002, we find no systematic benefits in terms of higher premia to boards that have [staggered structures].). |
45 |
Lucian Bebchuk, Alma Cohen, The Costs of Entrenched Boards (2004). |
46 |
Lucian Bebchuk, Alma Cohen and Charles C.Y. Wang, Staggered Boards and the Wealth of Shareholders: Evidence from a Natural Experiment, SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1706806 (2010), p. 26. |
47 |
Spencer Stuart Board Index, 2011, p. 14 |
48 |
Lucian Bebchuk, John Coates IV and Guhan Subramanian, The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Theory, Evidence, and Policy, 54 Stanford Law Review 887-951 (2002). |
19
Academic literature suggests that there is no evidence of a correlation between either length of tenure or age and director performance. On occasion, term limits can be used as a means to remove a director for boards that are unwilling to police their membership and to enforce turnover. Some shareholders support term limits as a way to force change when boards are unwilling to do so.
While we understand that age limits can be a way to force change where boards are unwilling to make changes on their own, the long-term impact of age limits restricts experienced and potentially valuable board members from service through an arbitrary means. Further, age limits unfairly imply that older (or, in rare cases, younger) directors cannot contribute to company oversight.
In our view, a directors experience can be a valuable asset to shareholders because of the complex, critical issues that boards face. However, we support periodic director rotation to ensure a fresh perspective in the boardroom and the generation of new ideas and business strategies. We believe the board should implement such rotation instead of relying on arbitrary limits. When necessary, shareholders can address the issue of director rotation through director elections.
We believe that shareholders are better off monitoring the boards approach to corporate governance and the boards stewardship of company performance rather than imposing inflexible rules that dont necessarily correlate with returns or benefits for shareholders.
However, if a board adopts term/age limits, it should follow through and not waive such limits. If the board waives its term/age limits, Glass Lewis will consider recommending shareholders vote against the nominating and/or governance committees, unless the rule was waived with sufficient explanation, such as consummation of a corporate transaction like a merger.
REQUIRING TWO OR MORE NOMINEES PER BOARD SEAT
In an attempt to address lack of access to the ballot, shareholders sometimes propose that the board give shareholders a choice of directors for each open board seat in every election. However, we feel that policies requiring a selection of multiple nominees for each board seat would discourage prospective directors from accepting nominations. A prospective director could not be confident either that he or she is the boards clear choice or that he or she would be elected. Therefore, Glass Lewis generally will vote against such proposals.
Proxy Access has garnered significant attention in recent years. As in 2012, we expect to see a number of shareholder proposals regarding this topic in 2013 and perhaps even some companies unilaterally adopting some elements of proxy access. However, considering the uncertainty in this area and the inherent case-by-case nature of those situations, we refrain from establishing any specific parameters at this time.
For a discussion of recent regulatory events in this area, along with a detailed overview of the Glass Lewis approach to Shareholder Proposals regarding Proxy Access, refer to Glass Lewis Guidelines on Shareholder Resolutions and Initiatives .
MAJORITY VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
In stark contrast to the failure of shareholder access to gain acceptance, majority voting for the election of directors is fast becoming the de facto standard in corporate board elections. In our view, the majority voting proposals are an effort to make the case for shareholder impact on director elections on a company-specific basis.
While this proposal would not give shareholders the opportunity to nominate directors or lead to elections where shareholders have a choice among director candidates, if implemented, the proposal would allow shareholders to have a voice in determining whether the nominees proposed by the board should actually serve as the overseer-representatives of shareholders in the boardroom. We believe this would be a favorable outcome for shareholders.
20
During the first half of 2012, Glass Lewis tracked over 35 shareholder proposals seeking to require a majority vote to elect directors at annual meetings in the U.S., roughly on par with what we reviewed in each of the past several years, but a sharp contrast to the 147 proposals tracked during all of 2006. The large drop in the number of proposals being submitted in recent years compared to 2006 is a result of many companies having already adopted some form of majority voting, including approximately 79% of companies in the S&P 500 index, up from 56% in 2008. 49 During 2012 these proposals received on average 61.2% shareholder support (based on for and against votes), up from 54% in 2008.
Today, most US companies still elect directors by a plurality vote standard. Under that standard, if one shareholder holding only one share votes in favor of a nominee (including himself, if the director is a shareholder), that nominee wins the election and assumes a seat on the board. The common concern among companies with a plurality voting standard was the possibility that one or more directors would not receive a majority of votes, resulting in failed elections. This was of particular concern during the 1980s, an era of frequent takeovers and contests for control of companies.
ADVANTAGES OF A MAJORITY VOTE STANDARD
If a majority vote standard were implemented, a nominee would have to receive the support of a majority of the shares voted in order to be elected. Thus, shareholders could collectively vote to reject a director they believe will not pursue their best interests. We think that this minimal amount of protection for shareholders is reasonable and will not upset the corporate structure nor reduce the willingness of qualified shareholder-focused directors to serve in the future.
We believe that a majority vote standard will likely lead to more attentive directors. Occasional use of this power will likely prevent the election of directors with a record of ignoring shareholder interests in favor of other interests that conflict with those of investors. Glass Lewis will generally support proposals calling for the election of directors by a majority vote except for use in contested director elections.
In response to the high level of support majority voting has garnered, many companies have voluntarily taken steps to implement majority voting or modified approaches to majority voting. These steps range from a modified approach requiring directors that receive a majority of withheld votes to resign (e.g., Ashland Inc.) to actually requiring a majority vote of outstanding shares to elect directors (e.g., Intel).
We feel that the modified approach does not go far enough because requiring a director to resign is not the same as requiring a majority vote to elect a director and does not allow shareholders a definitive voice in the election process. Further, under the modified approach, the corporate governance committee could reject a resignation and, even if it accepts the resignation, the corporate governance committee decides on the directors replacement. And since the modified approach is usually adopted as a policy by the board or a board committee, it could be altered by the same board or committee at any time.
49 | Spencer Stuart Board Index, 2011, p. 14 |
21
III. TRANSPARENCY AND INTEGRITY OF FINANCIAL REPORTING
The auditors role as gatekeeper is crucial in ensuring the integrity and transparency of the financial information necessary for protecting shareholder value. Shareholders rely on the auditor to ask tough questions and to do a thorough analysis of a companys books to ensure that the information provided to shareholders is complete, accurate, fair, and that it is a reasonable representation of a companys financial position. The only way shareholders can make rational investment decisions is if the market is equipped with accurate information about a companys fiscal health. As stated in the October 6, 2008 Final Report of the Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession to the U.S. Department of the Treasury:
The auditor is expected to offer critical and objective judgment on the financial matters under consideration, and actual and perceived absence of conflicts is critical to that expectation. The Committee believes that auditors, investors, public companies, and other market participants must understand the independence requirements and their objectives, and that auditors must adopt a mindset of skepticism when facing situations that may compromise their independence.
As such, shareholders should demand an objective, competent and diligent auditor who performs at or above professional standards at every company in which the investors hold an interest. Like directors, auditors should be free from conflicts of interest and should avoid situations requiring a choice between the auditors interests and the publics interests. Almost without exception, shareholders should be able to annually review an auditors performance and to annually ratify a boards auditor selection. Moreover, in October 2008, the Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession went even further, and recommended that to further enhance audit committee oversight and auditor accountability... disclosure in the company proxy statement regarding shareholder ratification [should] include the name(s) of the senior auditing partner(s) staffed on the engagement. 50
On August 16, 2011, the PCAOB issued a Concept Release seeking public comment on ways that auditor independence, objectivity and professional skepticism could be enhanced, with a specific emphasis on mandatory audit firm rotation. The PCAOB convened several public roundtable meeting during 2012 to further discuss such matters. Glass Lewis believes auditor rotation can ensure both the independence of the auditor and the integrity of the audit; we will typically recommend supporting proposals to require auditor rotation when the proposal uses a reasonable period of time (usually not less than 5-7 years) particularly at companies with a history of accounting problems.
VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS ON AUDITOR RATIFICATION
We generally support managements choice of auditor except when we believe the auditors independence or audit integrity has been compromised. Where a board has not allowed shareholders to review and ratify an auditor, we typically recommend voting against the audit committee chairman. When there have been material restatements of annual financial statements or material weakness in internal controls, we usually recommend voting against the entire audit committee.
50 |
Final Report of the Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. p. VIII:20, October 6, 2008. |
22
Reasons why we may not recommend ratification of an auditor include:
1. |
When audit fees plus audit-related fees total less than the tax fees and/or other non-audit fees. |
2. |
Recent material restatements of annual financial statements, including those resulting in the reporting of material weaknesses in internal controls and including late filings by the company where the auditor bears some responsibility for the restatement or late filing. 51 |
3. |
When the auditor performs prohibited services such as tax-shelter work, tax services for the CEO or CFO, or contingent-fee work, such as a fee based on a percentage of economic benefit to the company. |
4. |
When audit fees are excessively low, especially when compared with other companies in the same industry. |
5. |
When the company has aggressive accounting policies. |
6. |
When the company has poor disclosure or lack of transparency in its financial statements. |
7. |
Where the auditor limited its liability through its contract with the company or the audit contract requires the corporation to use alternative dispute resolution procedures without adequate justification. |
8. |
We also look for other relationships or concerns with the auditor that might suggest a conflict between the auditors interests and shareholder interests. |
A pension accounting question often raised in proxy proposals is what effect, if any, projected returns on employee pension assets should have on a companys net income. This issue often arises in the executive-compensation context in a discussion of the extent to which pension accounting should be reflected in business performance for purposes of calculating payments to executives.
Glass Lewis believes that pension credits should not be included in measuring income that is used to award performance-based compensation. Because many of the assumptions used in accounting for retirement plans are subject to the companys discretion, management would have an obvious conflict of interest if pay were tied to pension income. In our view, projected income from pensions does not truly reflect a companys performance.
51 |
An auditor does not audit interim financial statements. Thus, we generally do not believe that an auditor should be opposed due to a restatement of interim financial statements unless the nature of the misstatement is clear from a reading of the incorrect financial statements. |
23
IV. THE LINK BETWEEN COMPENSATION AND PERFORMANCE
Glass Lewis carefully reviews the compensation awarded to senior executives, as we believe that this is an important area in which the boards priorities are revealed. Glass Lewis strongly believes executive compensation should be linked directly with the performance of the business the executive is charged with managing. We believe the most effective compensation arrangements provide for an appropriate mix of performance-based short- and long-term incentives in addition to base salary.
Glass Lewis believes that comprehensive, timely and transparent disclosure of executive pay is critical to allowing shareholders to evaluate the extent to which the pay is keeping pace with company performance. When reviewing proxy materials, Glass Lewis examines whether the company discloses the performance metrics used to determine executive compensation. We recognize performance metrics must necessarily vary depending on the company and industry, among other factors, and may include items such as total shareholder return, earning per share growth, return on equity, return on assets and revenue growth. However, we believe companies should disclose why the specific performance metrics were selected and how the actions they are designed to incentivize will lead to better corporate performance.
Moreover, it is rarely in shareholders interests to disclose competitive data about individual salaries below the senior executive level. Such disclosure could create internal personnel discord that would be counterproductive for the company and its shareholders. While we favor full disclosure for senior executives and we view pay disclosure at the aggregate level (e.g., the number of employees being paid over a certain amount or in certain categories) as potentially useful, we do not believe shareholders need or will benefit from detailed reports about individual management employees other than the most senior executives.
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (SAY-ON-PAY)
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) required most companies 52 to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation at the first shareholder meeting that occurs six months after enactment of the bill (January 21, 2011).
This practice of allowing shareholders a non-binding vote on a companys compensation report is standard practice in many non-US countries, and has been a requirement for most companies in the United Kingdom since 2003 and in Australia since 2005. Although Say-on-Pay proposals are non-binding, a high level of against or abstain votes indicate substantial shareholder concern about a companys compensation policies and procedures.
Given the complexity of most companies compensation programs, Glass Lewis applies a highly nuanced approach when analyzing advisory votes on executive compensation. We review each companys compensation on a case-by-case basis, recognizing that each company must be examined in the context of industry, size, maturity, performance, financial condition, its historic pay for performance practices, and any other relevant internal or external factors.
We believe that each company should design and apply specific compensation policies and practices that are appropriate to the circumstances of the company and, in particular, will attract and retain competent executives and other staff, while motivating them to grow the companys long-term shareholder value.
52 |
Small reporting companies (as defined by the SEC as below $75,000,000 in market capitalization) received a two-year reprieve and will only be subject to say-on-pay requirements beginning at meetings held on or after January 21, 2013. |
24
Where we find those specific policies and practices serve to reasonably align compensation with performance, and such practices are adequately disclosed, Glass Lewis will recommend supporting the companys approach. If, however, those specific policies and practices fail to demonstrably link compensation with performance, Glass Lewis will generally recommend voting against the say-on-pay proposal.
Glass Lewis focuses on four main areas when reviewing Say-on-Pay proposals:
|
The overall design and structure of the Companys executive compensation program including performance metrics; |
|
The quality and content of the Companys disclosure; |
|
The quantum paid to executives; and |
|
The link between compensation and performance as indicated by the Companys current and past pay-for-performance grades |
We also review any significant changes or modifications, and rationale for such changes, made to the Companys compensation structure or award amounts, including base salaries.
SAY-ON-PAY VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS
In cases where we find deficiencies in a companys compensation programs design, implementation or management, we will recommend that shareholders vote against the Say-on-Pay proposal. Generally such instances include evidence of a pattern of poor pay-for-performance practices (i.e., deficient or failing pay for performance grades), unclear or questionable disclosure regarding the overall compensation structure (e.g., limited information regarding benchmarking processes, limited rationale for bonus performance metrics and targets, etc.), questionable adjustments to certain aspects of the overall compensation structure (e.g., limited rationale for significant changes to performance targets or metrics, the payout of guaranteed bonuses or sizable retention grants, etc.), and/or other egregious compensation practices.
Although not an exhaustive list, the following issues when weighed together may cause Glass Lewis to recommend voting against a say-on-pay vote:
|
Inappropriate peer group and/or benchmarking issues |
|
Inadequate or no rationale for changes to peer groups |
|
Egregious or excessive bonuses, equity awards or severance payments, including golden handshakes and golden parachutes |
|
Guaranteed bonuses |
|
Targeting overall levels of compensation at higher than median without adequate justification |
|
Bonus or long-term plan targets set at less than mean or negative performance levels |
|
Performance targets not sufficiently challenging, and/or providing for high potential payouts |
|
Performance targets lowered, without justification |
|
Discretionary bonuses paid when short- or long-term incentive plan targets were not met |
|
Executive pay high relative to peers not justified by outstanding company performance |
25
|
The terms of the long-term incentive plans are inappropriate (please see Long-Term Incentives below) |
In the instance that a company has simply failed to provide sufficient disclosure of its policies, we may recommend shareholders vote against this proposal solely on this basis, regardless of the appropriateness of compensation levels.
ADDITIONAL SCRUTINY FOR COMPANIES WITH SIGNIFICANT OPPOSITION IN 2012
At companies that received a significant shareholder vote (anything greater than 25%) against their say on pay proposal in 2012, we believe the board should demonstrate some level of engagement and responsiveness to the shareholder concerns behind the discontent. While we recognize that sweeping changes cannot be made to a compensation program without due consideration and that a majority of shareholders voted in favor of the proposal, we will look for disclosure in the proxy statement and other publicly-disclosed filings that indicates the compensation committee is responding to the prior years vote results including engaging with large shareholders to identify the concerns causing the substantial vote against. In the absence of any evidence that the board is actively engaging shareholders on this issue and responding accordingly, we will recommend holding compensation committee members accountable for a failure to respond in consideration of the level of the vote against and the severity and history of the compensation problems.
Where we identify egregious compensation practices, we may also recommend voting against the compensation committee based on the practices or actions of its members during the year, such as approving large one-off payments, the inappropriate, unjustified use of discretion, or sustained poor pay for performance practices.
A short-term bonus or incentive (STI) should be demonstrably tied to performance. Whenever possible, we believe a mix of corporate and individual performance measures is appropriate. We would normally expect performance measures for STIs to be based on internal financial measures such as net profit after tax, EPS growth and divisional profitability as well as non-financial factors such as those related to safety, environmental issues, and customer satisfaction. However, we accept variations from these metrics if they are tied to the Companys business drivers.
Further, the target and potential maximum awards that can be achieved under STI awards should be disclosed. Shareholders should expect stretching performance targets for the maximum award to be achieved. Any increase in the potential maximum award should be clearly justified to shareholders.
Glass Lewis recognizes that disclosure of some measures may include commercially confidential information. Therefore, we believe it may be reasonable to exclude such information in some cases as long as the company provides sufficient justification for non-disclosure. However, where a short-term bonus has been paid, companies should disclose the extent to which performance has been achieved against relevant targets, including disclosure of the actual target achieved.
Where management has received significant STIs but short-term performance as measured by such indicators as increase in profit and/or EPS growth over the previous year prima facie appears to be poor or negative, we believe the company should provide a clear explanation why these significant short-term payments were made.
Glass Lewis recognizes the value of equity-based incentive programs. When used appropriately, they can provide a vehicle for linking an executives pay to company performance, thereby aligning their interests with those of shareholders. In addition, equity-based compensation can be an effective way to attract, retain and motivate key employees.
26
There are certain elements that Glass Lewis believes are common to most well-structured long-term incentive (LTI) plans. These include:
|
No re-testing or lowering of performance conditions |
|
Performance metrics that cannot be easily manipulated by management |
|
Two or more performance metrics |
|
At least one relative performance metric that compares the companys performance to a relevant peer group or index |
|
Performance periods of at least three years |
|
Stretching metrics that incentivize executives to strive for outstanding performance |
|
Individual limits expressed as a percentage of base salary |
Performance measures should be carefully selected and should relate to the specific business/industry in which the company operates and, especially, the key value drivers of the companys business.
Glass Lewis believes that measuring a companys performance with multiple metrics serves to provide a more complete picture of the companys performance than a single metric, which may focus too much management attention on a single target and is therefore more susceptible to manipulation. External benchmarks should be disclosed and transparent, such as total shareholder return (TSR) against a well-selected sector index, peer group or other performance hurdle. The rationale behind the selection of a specific index or peer group should be disclosed. Internal benchmarks (e.g. earnings per share growth) should also be disclosed and transparent, unless a cogent case for confidentiality is made and fully explained.
We also believe shareholders should evaluate the relative success of a companys compensation programs, particularly existing equity-based incentive plans, in linking pay and performance in evaluating new LTI plans to determine the impact of additional stock awards. We will therefore review the companys pay-for-performance grade, see below for more information, and specifically the proportion of total compensation that is stock-based.
Glass Lewis believes an integral part of a well-structured compensation package is a successful link between pay and performance. Therefore, Glass Lewis developed a proprietary pay-for-performance model to evaluate the link between pay and performance of the top five executives at US companies. Our model benchmarks these executives pay and company performance against four peer groups and across seven performance metrics. Using a forced curve and a school letter-grade system, we grade companies from A-F according to their pay-for-performance linkage. The grades guide our evaluation of compensation committee effectiveness and we generally recommend voting against compensation committee of companies with a pattern of failing our pay-for-performance analysis.
We also use this analysis to inform our voting decisions on say-on-pay proposals. As such, if a company receives a failing grade from our proprietary model, we are likely to recommend shareholders to vote against the say-on-pay proposal. However, there may be exceptions to this rule such as when a company makes significant enhancements to its compensation programs.
RECOUPMENT (CLAWBACK) PROVISIONS
Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Act requires the SEC to create a rule requiring listed companies to adopt policies for recouping certain compensation during a three-year look-back period. The rule applies to incentive-based compensation paid to current or former executives if the company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to erroneous data resulting from material non-compliance with any financial reporting requirements under the securities laws.
27
These recoupment provisions are more stringent than under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in three respects: (i) the provisions extend to current or former executive officers rather than only to the CEO and CFO; (ii) it has a three-year look-back period (rather than a twelve-month look-back period); and (iii) it allows for recovery of compensation based upon a financial restatement due to erroneous data, and therefore does not require misconduct on the part of the executive or other employees.
The Dodd-Frank Act also requires companies to allow shareholders a non-binding vote on the frequency of say-on-pay votes, i.e. every one, two or three years. Additionally, Dodd-Frank requires companies to hold such votes on the frequency of say-on-pay votes at least once every six years.
We believe companies should submit say-on-pay votes to shareholders every year. We believe that the time and financial burdens to a company with regard to an annual vote are relatively small and incremental and are outweighed by the benefits to shareholders through more frequent accountability. Implementing biannual or triennial votes on executive compensation limits shareholders ability to hold the board accountable for its compensation practices through means other than voting against the compensation committee. Unless a company provides a compelling rationale or unique circumstances for say-on-pay votes less frequent than annually, we will generally recommend that shareholders support annual votes on compensation.
VOTE ON GOLDEN PARACHUTE ARRANGEMENTS
The Dodd-Frank Act also requires companies to provide shareholders with a separate non-binding vote on approval of golden parachute compensation arrangements in connection with certain change-in-control transactions. However, if the golden parachute arrangements have previously been subject to a say-on-pay vote which shareholders approved, then this required vote is waived.
Glass Lewis believes the narrative and tabular disclosure of golden parachute arrangements will benefit all shareholders. Glass Lewis will analyze each golden parachute arrangement on a case-by-case basis, taking into account, among other items: the ultimate value of the payments particularly compared to the value of the transaction, the tenure and position of the executives in question, and the type of triggers involved (single vs double).
EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN PROPOSALS
We believe that equity compensation awards are useful, when not abused, for retaining employees and providing an incentive for them to act in a way that will improve company performance. Glass Lewis evaluates equity-based compensation plans using a detailed model and analytical review.
Equity-based compensation programs have important differences from cash compensation plans and bonus programs. Accordingly, our model and analysis takes into account factors such as plan administration, the method and terms of exercise, repricing history, express or implied rights to reprice, and the presence of evergreen provisions.
Our analysis is primarily quantitative and focused on the plans cost as compared with the businesss operating metrics. We run twenty different analyses, comparing the program with absolute limits we believe are key to equity value creation and with a carefully chosen peer group. In general, our model seeks to determine whether the proposed plan is either absolutely excessive or is more than one standard deviation away from the average plan for the peer group on a range of criteria, including dilution to shareholders and the projected annual cost relative to the companys financial performance. Each of the twenty analyses (and their constituent parts) is weighted and the plan is scored in accordance with that weight.
28
In our analysis, we compare the programs expected annual expense with the businesss operating metrics to help determine whether the plan is excessive in light of company performance. We also compare the option plans expected annual cost to the enterprise value of the firm rather than to market capitalization because the employees, managers and directors of the firm contribute to the creation of enterprise value but not necessarily market capitalization (the biggest difference is seen where cash represents the vast majority of market capitalization). Finally, we do not rely exclusively on relative comparisons with averages because, in addition to creeping averages serving to inflate compensation, we believe that some absolute limits are warranted.
We evaluate equity plans based on certain overarching principles:
1. |
Companies should seek more shares only when needed. |
2. |
Requested share amounts should be small enough that companies seek shareholder approval every three to four years (or more frequently). |
3. |
If a plan is relatively expensive, it should not grant options solely to senior executives and board members. |
4. |
Annual net share count and voting power dilution should be limited. |
5. |
Annual cost of the plan (especially if not shown on the income statement) should be reasonable as a percentage of financial results and should be in line with the peer group. |
6. |
The expected annual cost of the plan should be proportional to the businesss value. |
7. |
The intrinsic value that option grantees received in the past should be reasonable compared with the businesss financial results. |
8. |
Plans should deliver value on a per-employee basis when compared with programs at peer companies. |
9. |
Plans should not permit repricing of stock options. |
10. |
Plans should not contain excessively liberal administrative or payment terms. |
11. |
Plans should not count shares in ways that understate the potential dilution, or cost, to common shareholders. This refers to inverse full-value award multipliers. |
12. |
Selected performance metrics should be challenging and appropriate, and should be subject to relative performance measurements. |
13. |
Stock grants should be subject to minimum vesting and/or holding periods sufficient to ensure sustainable performance and promote retention. |
Glass Lewis views option repricing plans and option exchange programs with great skepticism. Shareholders have substantial risk in owning stock and we believe that the employees, officers, and directors who receive stock options should be similarly situated to align their interests with shareholder interests.
We are concerned that option grantees who believe they will be rescued from underwater options will be more inclined to take unjustifiable risks. Moreover, a predictable pattern of repricing or exchanges substantially alters a stock options value because options that will practically never expire deeply out of the money are worth far more than options that carry a risk of expiration.
In short, repricings and option exchange programs change the bargain between shareholders and employees after the bargain has been struck.
There is one circumstance in which a repricing or option exchange program is acceptable: if macroeconomic or industry trends, rather than specific company issues, cause a stocks value to decline dramatically and the repricing is necessary to motivate and retain employees. In this circumstance, we think it fair to conclude that option grantees may be suffering from a risk that was not foreseeable when the original bargain was struck. In such a circumstance, we will recommend supporting a repricing only if the following conditions are true:
1. | Officers and board members cannot participate in the program; |
29
2. | The stock decline mirrors the market or industry price decline in terms of timing and approximates the decline in magnitude; |
3. | The exchange is value-neutral or value-creative to shareholders using very conservative assumptions and with a recognition of the adverse selection problems inherent in voluntary programs; and |
4. | Management and the board make a cogent case for needing to motivate and retain existing employees, such as being in a competitive employment market. |
OPTION BACKDATING, SPRING-LOADING, AND BULLET-DODGING
Glass Lewis views option backdating, and the related practices of spring-loading and bullet-dodging, as egregious actions that warrant holding the appropriate management and board members responsible. These practices are similar to repricing options and eliminate much of the downside risk inherent in an option grant that is designed to induce recipients to maximize shareholder return.
Backdating an option is the act of changing an options grant date from the actual grant date to an earlier date when the market price of the underlying stock was lower, resulting in a lower exercise price for the option. Since 2006, Glass Lewis has identified over 270 companies that have disclosed internal or government investigations into their past stock-option grants.
Spring-loading is granting stock options while in possession of material, positive information that has not been disclosed publicly. Bullet-dodging is delaying the grants of stock options until after the release of material, negative information. This can allow option grants to be made at a lower price either before the release of positive news or following the release of negative news, assuming the stocks price will move up or down in response to the information. This raises a concern similar to that of insider trading, or the trading on material non-public information.
The exercise price for an option is determined on the day of grant, providing the recipient with the same market risk as an investor who bought shares on that date. However, where options were backdated, the executive or the board (or the compensation committee) changed the grant date retroactively. The new date may be at or near the lowest price for the year or period. This would be like allowing an investor to look back and select the lowest price of the year at which to buy shares.
A 2006 study of option grants made between 1996 and 2005 at 8,000 companies found that option backdating can be an indication of poor internal controls. The study found that option backdating was more likely to occur at companies without a majority independent board and with a long-serving CEO; both factors, the study concluded, were associated with greater CEO influence on the companys compensation and governance practices. 53
Where a company granted backdated options to an executive who is also a director, Glass Lewis will recommend voting against that executive/director, regardless of who decided to make the award. In addition, Glass Lewis will recommend voting against those directors who either approved or allowed the backdating. Glass Lewis feels that executives and directors who either benefited from backdated options or authorized the practice have breached their fiduciary responsibility to shareholders.
Given the severe tax and legal liabilities to the company from backdating, Glass Lewis will consider recommending voting against members of the audit committee who served when options were backdated, a restatement occurs, material weaknesses in internal controls exist and disclosures indicate there was a lack of documentation. These committee members failed in their responsibility to ensure the integrity of the companys financial reports.
When a company has engaged in spring-loading or bullet-dodging, Glass Lewis will consider
53 | Lucian Bebchuk, Yaniv Grinstein and Urs Peyer. LUCKY CEOs. November, 2006. |
30
recommending voting against the compensation committee members where there has been a pattern of granting options at or near historic lows. Glass Lewis will also recommend voting against executives serving on the board who benefited from the spring-loading or bullet-dodging.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code allows companies to deduct compensation in excess of $1 million for the CEO and the next three most highly compensated executive officers, excluding the CFO, upon shareholder approval of the excess compensation. Glass Lewis recognizes the value of executive incentive programs and the tax benefit of shareholder-approved incentive plans.
We believe the best practice for companies is to provide robust disclosure to shareholders so that they can make fully-informed judgments about the reasonableness of the proposed compensation plan. To allow for meaningful shareholder review, we prefer that disclosure should include specific performance metrics, a maximum award pool, and a maximum award amount per employee. We also believe it is important to analyze the estimated grants to see if they are reasonable and in line with the companys peers.
We typically recommend voting against a 162(m) plan where: a company fails to provide at least a list of performance targets; a company fails to provide one of either a total pool or an individual maximum; or the proposed plan is excessive when compared with the plans of the companys peers.
The companys record of aligning pay with performance (as evaluated using our proprietary pay-for-performance model) also plays a role in our recommendation. Where a company has a record of setting reasonable pay relative to business performance, we generally recommend voting in favor of a plan even if the plan caps seem large relative to peers because we recognize the value in special pay arrangements for continued exceptional performance.
As with all other issues we review, our goal is to provide consistent but contextual advice given the specifics of the company and ongoing performance. Overall, we recognize that it is generally not in shareholders best interests to vote against such a plan and forgo the potential tax benefit since shareholder rejection of such plans will not curtail the awards; it will only prevent the tax deduction associated with them.
Glass Lewis believes that non-employee directors should receive reasonable and appropriate compensation for the time and effort they spend serving on the board and its committees. Director fees should be competitive in order to retain and attract qualified individuals. But excessive fees represent a financial cost to the company and threaten to compromise the objectivity and independence of non-employee directors. Therefore, a balance is required. We will consider recommending supporting compensation plans that include option grants or other equity-based awards that help to align the interests of outside directors with those of shareholders. However, equity grants to directors should not be performance-based to ensure directors are not incentivized in the same manner as executives but rather serve as a check on imprudent risk-taking in executive compensation plan design.
Glass Lewis uses a proprietary model and analyst review to evaluate the costs of equity plans compared to the plans of peer companies with similar market capitalizations. We use the results of this model to guide our voting recommendations on stock-based director compensation plans.
31
V. GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE AND THE SHAREHOLDER FRANCHISE
POISON PILLS (SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLANS)
Glass Lewis believes that poison pill plans are not generally in shareholders best interests. They can reduce management accountability by substantially limiting opportunities for corporate takeovers. Rights plans can thus prevent shareholders from receiving a buy-out premium for their stock. Typically we recommend that shareholders vote against these plans to protect their financial interests and ensure that they have an opportunity to consider any offer for their shares, especially those at a premium.
We believe boards should be given wide latitude in directing company activities and in charting the companys course. However, on an issue such as this, where the link between the shareholders financial interests and their right to consider and accept buyout offers is substantial, we believe that shareholders should be allowed to vote on whether they support such a plans implementation. This issue is different from other matters that are typically left to board discretion. Its potential impact on and relation to shareholders is direct and substantial. It is also an issue in which management interests may be different from those of shareholders; thus, ensuring that shareholders have a voice is the only way to safeguard their interests.
In certain circumstances, we will support a poison pill that is limited in scope to accomplish a particular objective, such as the closing of an important merger, or a pill that contains what we believe to be a reasonable qualifying offer clause. We will consider supporting a poison pill plan if the qualifying offer clause includes each of the following attributes:
1. |
The form of offer is not required to be an all-cash transaction; |
2. |
The offer is not required to remain open for more than 90 business days; |
3. |
The offeror is permitted to amend the offer, reduce the offer, or otherwise change the terms; |
4. |
There is no fairness opinion requirement; and |
5. |
There is a low to no premium requirement. |
Where these requirements are met, we typically feel comfortable that shareholders will have the opportunity to voice their opinion on any legitimate offer.
Similarly, Glass Lewis may consider supporting a limited poison pill in the unique event that a company seeks shareholder approval of a rights plan for the express purpose of preserving Net Operating Losses (NOLs). While companies with NOLs can generally carry these losses forward to offset future taxable income, Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code limits companies ability to use NOLs in the event of a change of ownership. 54 In this case, a company may adopt or amend a poison pill (NOL pill) in order to prevent an inadvertent change of ownership by multiple investors purchasing small chunks of stock at the same time, and thereby preserve the ability to carry the NOLs forward. Often such NOL pills have trigger thresholds much lower than the common 15% or 20% thresholds, with some NOL pill triggers as low as 5%.
54 |
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code refers to a change of ownership of more than 50 percentage points by one or more 5% shareholders within a three-year period. The statute is intended to deter the trafficking of net operating losses. |
32
Glass Lewis evaluates NOL pills on a strictly case-by-case basis taking into consideration, among other factors, the value of the NOLs to the company, the likelihood of a change of ownership based on the size of the holding and the nature of the larger shareholders, the trigger threshold and whether the term of the plan is limited in duration (i.e., whether it contains a reasonable sunset provision) or is subject to periodic board review and/or shareholder ratification. However, we will recommend that shareholders vote against a proposal to adopt or amend a pill to include NOL protective provisions if the company has adopted a more narrowly tailored means of preventing a change in control to preserve its NOLs. For example, a company may limit share transfers in its charter to prevent a change of ownership from occurring.
Furthermore, we believe that shareholders should be offered the opportunity to vote on any adoption or renewal of a NOL pill regardless of any potential tax benefit that it offers a company. As such, we will consider recommending voting against those members of the board who served at the time when an NOL pill was adopted without shareholder approval within the prior twelve months and where the NOL pill is not subject to shareholder ratification.
Fair price provisions, which are rare, require that certain minimum price and procedural requirements be observed by any party that acquires more than a specified percentage of a corporations common stock. The provision is intended to protect minority shareholder value when an acquirer seeks to accomplish a merger or other transaction which would eliminate or change the interests of the minority stockholders. The provision is generally applied against the acquirer unless the takeover is approved by a majority of continuing directors and holders of a majority, in some cases a supermajority as high as 80%, of the combined voting power of all stock entitled to vote to alter, amend, or repeal the above provisions.
The effect of a fair price provision is to require approval of any merger or business combination with an interested stockholder by 51% of the voting stock of the company, excluding the shares held by the interested stockholder. An interested stockholder is generally considered to be a holder of 10% or more of the companys outstanding stock, but the trigger can vary.
Generally, provisions are put in place for the ostensible purpose of preventing a back-end merger where the interested stockholder would be able to pay a lower price for the remaining shares of the company than he or she paid to gain control. The effect of a fair price provision on shareholders, however, is to limit their ability to gain a premium for their shares through a partial tender offer or open market acquisition which typically raise the share price, often significantly. A fair price provision discourages such transactions because of the potential costs of seeking shareholder approval and because of the restrictions on purchase price for completing a merger or other transaction at a later time.
Glass Lewis believes that fair price provisions, while sometimes protecting shareholders from abuse in a takeover situation, more often act as an impediment to takeovers, potentially limiting gains to shareholders from a variety of transactions that could significantly increase share price. In some cases, even the independent directors of the board cannot make exceptions when such exceptions may be in the best interests of shareholders. Given the existence of state law protections for minority shareholders such as Section 203 of the Delaware Corporations Code, we believe it is in the best interests of shareholders to remove fair price provisions.
In general, Glass Lewis believes that the board is in the best position to determine the appropriate jurisdiction of incorporation for the company. When examining a management proposal to reincorporate to a different state or country, we review the relevant financial benefits, generally related to improved corporate tax treatment, as well as changes in corporate governance provisions, especially those relating to shareholder rights, resulting from the change in domicile. Where the financial benefits are de minimis and there is a decrease in shareholder rights, we will recommend voting against the transaction.
33
However, costly, shareholder-initiated reincorporations are typically not the best route to achieve the furtherance of shareholder rights. We believe shareholders are generally better served by proposing specific shareholder resolutions addressing pertinent issues which may be implemented at a lower cost, and perhaps even with board approval. However, when shareholders propose a shift into a jurisdiction with enhanced shareholder rights, Glass Lewis examines the significant ways would the Company benefit from shifting jurisdictions including the following:
1. |
Is the board sufficiently independent? |
2. |
Does the Company have anti-takeover protections such as a poison pill or classified board in place? |
3. |
Has the board been previously unresponsive to shareholders (such as failing to implement a shareholder proposal that received majority shareholder support)? |
4. |
Do shareholders have the right to call special meetings of shareholders? |
5. |
Are there other material governance issues at the Company? |
6. |
Has the Companys performance matched or exceeded its peers in the past one and three years? |
7. |
How has the Company ranked in Glass Lewis pay-for-performance analysis during the last three years? |
8. |
Does the company have an independent chairman? |
We note, however, that we will only support shareholder proposals to change a companys place of incorporation in exceptional circumstances.
Glass Lewis believes that charter or bylaw provisions limiting a shareholders choice of legal venue are not in the best interests of shareholders. Such clauses may effectively discourage the use of shareholder derivative claims by increasing their associated costs and making them more difficult to pursue. As such, shareholders should be wary about approving any limitation on their legal recourse including limiting themselves to a single jurisdiction (e.g. Delaware) without compelling evidence that it will benefit shareholders.
For this reason, we recommend that shareholders vote against any bylaw or charter amendment seeking to adopt an exclusive forum provision unless the company: (i) provides a compelling argument on why the provision would directly benefit shareholders; (ii) provides evidence of abuse of legal process in other, non-favored jurisdictions; and (ii) maintains a strong record of good corporate governance practices.
Moreover, in the event a board seeks shareholder approval of a forum selection clause pursuant to a bundled bylaw amendment rather than as a separate proposal, we will weigh the importance of the other bundled provisions when determining the vote recommendation on the proposal. We will nonetheless recommend voting against the chairman of the governance committee for bundling disparate proposals into a single proposal (refer to our discussion of nominating and governance committee performance in Section I of the guidelines).
Glass Lewis believes that adequate capital stock is important to a companys operation. When analyzing a request for additional shares, we typically review four common reasons why a company might need additional capital stock:
1. |
Stock Split We typically consider three metrics when evaluating whether we think a stock split is likely or necessary: The historical stock pre-split price, if any; the current price relative to the companys most common trading price over the past 52 weeks; and some absolute limits on stock price that, in our view, either always make a stock split appropriate if desired by management or would almost never be a reasonable price at which to split a stock. |
34
2. |
Shareholder Defenses Additional authorized shares could be used to bolster takeover defenses such as a poison pill. Proxy filings often discuss the usefulness of additional shares in defending against or discouraging a hostile takeover as a reason for a requested increase. Glass Lewis is typically against such defenses and will oppose actions intended to bolster such defenses. |
3. |
Financing for Acquisitions We look at whether the company has a history of using stock for acquisitions and attempt to determine what levels of stock have typically been required to accomplish such transactions. Likewise, we look to see whether this is discussed as a reason for additional shares in the proxy. |
4. |
Financing for Operations We review the companys cash position and its ability to secure financing through borrowing or other means. We look at the companys history of capitalization and whether the company has had to use stock in the recent past as a means of raising capital. |
Issuing additional shares can dilute existing holders in limited circumstances. Further, the availability of additional shares, where the board has discretion to implement a poison pill, can often serve as a deterrent to interested suitors. Accordingly, where we find that the company has not detailed a plan for use of the proposed shares, or where the number of shares far exceeds those needed to accomplish a detailed plan, we typically recommend against the authorization of additional shares.
While we think that having adequate shares to allow management to make quick decisions and effectively operate the business is critical, we prefer that, for significant transactions, management come to shareholders to justify their use of additional shares rather than providing a blank check in the form of a large pool of unallocated shares available for any purpose.
We typically recommend that shareholders vote against proposals that would require advance notice of shareholder proposals or of director nominees.
These proposals typically attempt to require a certain amount of notice before shareholders are allowed to place proposals on the ballot. Notice requirements typically range between three to six months prior to the annual meeting. Advance notice requirements typically make it impossible for a shareholder who misses the deadline to present a shareholder proposal or a director nominee that might be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.
We believe shareholders should be able to review and vote on all proposals and director nominees. Shareholders can always vote against proposals that appear with little prior notice. Shareholders, as owners of a business, are capable of identifying issues on which they have sufficient information and ignoring issues on which they have insufficient information. Setting arbitrary notice restrictions limits the opportunity for shareholders to raise issues that may come up after the window closes.
Cumulative voting increases the ability of minority shareholders to elect a director by allowing shareholders to cast as many shares of the stock they own multiplied by the number of directors to be elected. As companies generally have multiple nominees up for election, cumulative voting allows shareholders to cast all of their votes for a single nominee, or a smaller number of nominees than up for election, thereby raising the likelihood of electing one or more of their preferred nominees to the board. It can be important when a board is controlled by insiders or affiliates and where the companys ownership structure includes one or more shareholders who control a majority-voting block of company stock.
35
Glass Lewis believes that cumulative voting generally acts as a safeguard for shareholders by ensuring that those who hold a significant minority of shares can elect a candidate of their choosing to the board. This allows the creation of boards that are responsive to the interests of all shareholders rather than just a small group of large holders.
However, academic literature indicates that where a highly independent board is in place and the company has a shareholder-friendly governance structure, shareholders may be better off without cumulative voting. The analysis underlying this literature indicates that shareholder returns at firms with good governance structures are lower and that boards can become factionalized and prone to evaluating the needs of special interests over the general interests of shareholders collectively.
We review cumulative voting proposals on a case-by-case basis, factoring in the independence of the board and the status of the companys governance structure. But we typically find these proposals on ballots at companies where independence is lacking and where the appropriate checks and balances favoring shareholders are not in place. In those instances we typically recommend in favor of cumulative voting.
Where a company has adopted a true majority vote standard (i.e., where a director must receive a majority of votes cast to be elected, as opposed to a modified policy indicated by a resignation policy only), Glass Lewis will recommend voting against cumulative voting proposals due to the incompatibility of the two election methods. For companies that have not adopted a true majority voting standard but have adopted some form of majority voting, Glass Lewis will also generally recommend voting against cumulative voting proposals if the company has not adopted antitakeover protections and has been responsive to shareholders.
Where a company has not adopted a majority voting standard and is facing both a shareholder proposal to adopt majority voting and a shareholder proposal to adopt cumulative voting, Glass Lewis will support only the majority voting proposal. When a company has both majority voting and cumulative voting in place, there is a higher likelihood of one or more directors not being elected as a result of not receiving a majority vote. This is because shareholders exercising the right to cumulate their votes could unintentionally cause the failed election of one or more directors for whom shareholders do not cumulate votes.
SUPERMAJORITY VOTE REQUIREMENTS
Glass Lewis believes that supermajority vote requirements impede shareholder action on ballot items critical to shareholder interests. An example is in the takeover context, where supermajority vote requirements can strongly limit the voice of shareholders in making decisions on such crucial matters as selling the business. This in turn degrades share value and can limit the possibility of buyout premiums to shareholders. Moreover, we believe that a supermajority vote requirement can enable a small group of shareholders to overrule the will of the majority shareholders. We believe that a simple majority is appropriate to approve all matters presented to shareholders.
We typically recommend that shareholders not give their proxy to management to vote on any other business items that may properly come before an annual or special meeting. In our opinion, granting unfettered discretion is unwise.
Glass Lewis will support proposals to adopt a provision preventing the payment of greenmail, which would serve to prevent companies from buying back company stock at significant premiums from
36
a certain shareholder. Since a large or majority shareholder could attempt to compel a board into purchasing its shares at a large premium, the anti-greenmail provision would generally require that a majority of shareholders other than the majority shareholder approve the buyback.
MUTUAL FUNDS: INVESTMENT POLICIES AND ADVISORY AGREEMENTS
Glass Lewis believes that decisions about a funds structure and/or a funds relationship with its investment advisor or sub-advisors are generally best left to management and the members of the board, absent a showing of egregious or illegal conduct that might threaten shareholder value. As such, we focus our analyses of such proposals on the following main areas:
|
The terms of any amended advisory or sub-advisory agreement; |
|
Any changes in the fee structure paid to the investment advisor; and |
|
Any material changes to the funds investment objective or strategy. |
We generally support amendments to a funds investment advisory agreement absent a material change that is not in the best interests of shareholders. A significant increase in the fees paid to an investment advisor would be reason for us to consider recommending voting against a proposed amendment to an investment advisory agreement. However, in certain cases, we are more inclined to support an increase in advisory fees if such increases result from being performance-based rather than asset-based. Furthermore, we generally support sub-advisory agreements between a funds advisor and sub-advisor, primarily because the fees received by the sub-advisor are paid by the advisor, and not by the fund.
In matters pertaining to a funds investment objective or strategy, we believe shareholders are best served when a funds objective or strategy closely resembles the investment discipline shareholders understood and selected when they initially bought into the fund. As such, we generally recommend voting against amendments to a funds investment objective or strategy when the proposed changes would leave shareholders with stakes in a fund that is noticeably different than when originally contemplated, and which could therefore potentially negatively impact some investors diversification strategies.
The complex organizational, operational, tax and compliance requirements of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) provide for a unique shareholder evaluation. In simple terms, a REIT must have a minimum of 100 shareholders (the 100 Shareholder Test) and no more than 50% of the value of its shares can be held by five or fewer individuals (the 5/50 Test). At least 75% of a REITs assets must be in real estate, it must derive 75% of its gross income from rents or mortgage interest, and it must pay out 90% of its taxable earnings as dividends. In addition, as a publicly traded security listed on a stock exchange, a REIT must comply with the same general listing requirements as a publicly traded equity.
In order to comply with such requirements, REITs typically include percentage ownership limitations in their organizational documents, usually in the range of 5% to 10% of the REITs outstanding shares. Given the complexities of REITs as an asset class, Glass Lewis applies a highly nuanced approach in our evaluation of REIT proposals, especially regarding changes in authorized share capital, including preferred stock.
PREFERRED STOCK ISSUANCES AT REITS
Glass Lewis is generally against the authorization of preferred shares that allows the board to determine the preferences, limitations and rights of the preferred shares (known as blank-check preferred stock). We believe that granting such broad discretion should be of concern to common shareholders, since blank-check preferred stock could be used as an antitakeover device or in some other fashion
37
that adversely affects the voting power or financial interests of common shareholders. However, given the requirement that a REIT must distribute 90% of its net income annually, it is inhibited from retaining capital to make investments in its business. As such, we recognize that equity financing likely plays a key role in a REITs growth and creation of shareholder value. Moreover, shareholder concern regarding the use of preferred stock as an anti-takeover mechanism may be allayed by the fact that most REITs maintain ownership limitations in their certificates of incorporation. For these reasons, along with the fact that REITs typically do not engage in private placements of preferred stock (which result in the rights of common shareholders being adversely impacted), we may support requests to authorize shares of blank-check preferred stock at REITs.
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
Business Development Companies (BDCs) were created by the U.S. Congress in 1980; they are regulated under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and are taxed as regulated investment companies (RICs) under the Internal Revenue Code. BDCs typically operate as publicly traded private equity firms that invest in early stage to mature private companies as well as small public companies. BDCs realize operating income when their investments are sold off, and therefore maintain complex organizational, operational, tax and compliance requirements that are similar to those of REITsthe most evident of which is that BDCs must distribute at least 90% of their taxable earnings as dividends.
AUTHORIZATION TO SELL SHARES AT A PRICE BELOW NET ASSET VALUE
Considering that BDCs are required to distribute nearly all their earnings to shareholders, they sometimes need to offer additional shares of common stock in the public markets to finance operations and acquisitions. However, shareholder approval is required in order for a BDC to sell shares of common stock at a price below Net Asset Value (NAV). Glass Lewis evaluates these proposals using a case-by-case approach, but will recommend supporting such requests if the following conditions are met:
1. |
The authorization to allow share issuances below NAV has an expiration date of one year or less from the date that shareholders approve the underlying proposal (i.e. the meeting date); |
2. |
The proposed discount below NAV is minimal (ideally no greater than 20%); |
3. |
The board specifies that the issuance will have a minimal or modest dilutive effect (ideally no greater than 25% of the Companys then-outstanding common stock prior to the issuance); and |
4. |
A majority of the Companys independent directors who do not have a financial interest in the issuance approve the sale. |
In short, we believe BDCs should demonstrate a responsible approach to issuing shares below NAV, by proactively addressing shareholder concerns regarding the potential dilution of the requested share issuance, and explaining if and how the Companys past below-NAV share issuances have benefitted the Company.
38
VI. COMPENSATION, ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE SHAREHOLDER INITIATIVES OVERVIEW
Glass Lewis typically prefers to leave decisions regarding day-to-day management and policy decisions, including those related to social, environmental or political issues, to management and the board, except when there is a clear link between the proposal and value enhancement or risk mitigation. We feel strongly that shareholders should not attempt to micromanage the company, its businesses or its executives through the shareholder initiative process. Rather, we believe shareholders should use their influence to push for governance structures that protect shareholders and promote director accountability. Shareholders should then put in place a board they can trust to make informed decisions that are in the best interests of the business and its owners, and then hold directors accountable for management and policy decisions through board elections. However, we recognize that support of appropriately crafted shareholder initiatives may at times serve to promote or protect shareholder value.
To this end, Glass Lewis evaluates shareholder proposals on a case-by-case basis. We generally recommend supporting shareholder proposals calling for the elimination of, as well as to require shareholder approval of, antitakeover devices such as poison pills and classified boards. We generally recommend supporting proposals likely to increase and/or protect shareholder value and also those that promote the furtherance of shareholder rights. In addition, we also generally recommend supporting proposals that promote director accountability and those that seek to improve compensation practices, especially those promoting a closer link between compensation and performance.
For a detailed review of compensation, environmental, social and governance shareholder initiatives, please refer to our comprehensive Proxy Paper Guidelines on Shareholder Initiatives.
39
DISCLAIMER
This document sets forth the proxy voting policy and guidelines of Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC. The policies included herein have been developed based on Glass Lewis experience with proxy voting and corporate governance issues and are not tailored to any specific person. Moreover, these guidelines are not intended to be exhaustive and do not include all potential voting issues. The information included herein is reviewed periodically and updated or revised as necessary. Glass Lewis is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. This document may not be reproduced or distributed in any manner without the written permission of Glass Lewis.
Copyright © 2012 Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC. All Rights Reserved.
40
SAN FRANCISCO
Headquarters
Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC
One Sansome Street
Suite 3300
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: +1 415-678-4110
Tel: +1 888-800-7001
Fax: +1 415-357-0200
NEW YORK
Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC
48 Wall Street
15th Floor
New York, N.Y. 10005
Tel: +1 212-797-3777
Fax: +1 212-980-4716
AUSTRALIA
CGI Glass Lewis Pty Limited
Suite 8.01, Level 8,
261 George St
Sydney NSW 2000
Australia
Tel: +61 2 9299 9266
Fax: +61 2 9299 1866
IRELAND
Glass Lewis Europe, Ltd.
6th Floor, Riverpoint
Bishops Quay
Limerick, Ireland
Phone: +353 61 404700
Fax: +353 61 404711
PROXY PAPERTM
GUIDELINES
2013 PROXY SEASOn
AN OVERVIEW OF THE GLASS LEWIS APPROACH TO PROXY ADVICE
INTERNATIONAL
COPYRIGHT 2013 GLASS LEWIS, & CO., LLC GLASS LEWIS & CO. GUIDELINES
1 | ||||
1 | ||||
2 | ||||
2 | ||||
2 | ||||
2 | ||||
3 | ||||
3 | ||||
3 | ||||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
4 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
6 | ||||
6 | ||||
6 | ||||
7 | ||||
7 | ||||
8 |
I
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Boards are put in place to represent shareholders and protect their interests. Glass Lewis seeks boards with a proven record of protecting shareholders and delivering value over the medium- and long-term. In our view, boards working to protect and enhance the best interests of shareholders typically include some independent directors (the percentage will vary by local market practice and regulations), boast a record of positive performance, have directors with diverse backgrounds, and appoint directors with a breadth and depth of experience.
When companies disclose sufficient relevant information, we look at each individual on the board and examine his or her relationships with the company, the companys executives and with other board members. The purpose of this inquiry is to determine whether pre-existing personal, familial or financial relationships are likely to impact the decisions of that board member. Where the company does not disclose the names and backgrounds of director nominees with sufficient time in advance of the shareholder meeting to evaluate their independence and performance, we will consider recommending abstaining on the directors election.
We vote in favor of governance structures that will drive positive performance and enhance shareholder value. The most crucial test of a boards commitment to the company and to its shareholders is the performance of the board and its members. The performance of directors in their capacity as board members and as executives of the company, when applicable, and in their roles at other companies where they serve is critical to this evaluation.
We believe a director is independent if he or she has no material financial, familial or other current relationships with the company, its executives or other board members except for service on the board and standard fees paid for that service. Relationships that have existed within the three-five years prior to the inquiry are usually considered to be current for purposes of this test.
In our view, a director is affiliated if he or she has a material financial, familial or other relationship with the company or its executives, but is not an employee of the company. This includes directors whose employers have a material financial relationship with the Company. This also includes a director who owns or controls 10-20% or more of the companys voting stock.
We define an inside director as one who simultaneously serves as a director and as an employee of the company. This category may include a chairman of the board who acts as an employee of the company or is paid as an employee of the company.
Although we typically vote for the election of directors, we will recommend voting against directors for the following reasons:
|
A director who attends less than 75% of the board and applicable committee meetings. |
|
A director who is also the CEO of a company where a serious restatement has occurred after the CEO certified the pre-restatement financial statements. |
We also feel that the following conflicts of interest may hinder a directors performance and will therefore recommend voting against a:
|
CFO who presently sits on the board. |
1
|
Director who presently sits on an excessive number of boards. |
|
Director, or a director whose immediate family member, provides material professional services to the company at any time during the past five years. |
|
Director, or a director whose immediate family member, engages in airplane, real estate or other similar deals, including perquisite type grants from the company. |
|
Director with an interlocking directorship. |
In some countries, companies elect their board members as a slate, whereby shareholders are unable to vote on the election of each individual director, but rather are limited to voting for or against the board as a whole. If significant issues exist concerning one or more of the nominees or in markets where directors are generally elected individually, we will recommend voting against the entire slate of directors.
We believe that independent directors should serve on a companys audit, compensation, nominating and governance committees. We will support boards with such a structure and encourage change where this is not the case.
REVIEW OF RISK MANAGEMENT CONTROLS
We believe companies, particularly financial firms, should have a dedicated risk committee, or a committee of the board charged with risk oversight, as well as a chief risk officer who reports directly to that committee, not to the CEO or another executive. In cases where a company has disclosed a sizable loss or writedown, and where a reasonable analysis indicates that the companys board-level risk committee should be held accountable for poor oversight, we would recommend that shareholders vote against such committee members on that basis. In addition, in cases where a company maintains a significant level of financial risk exposure but fails to disclose any explicit form of board-level risk oversight (committee or otherwise), we will consider recommending to vote against the chairman of the board on that basis.
Glass Lewis favors the repeal of staggered boards in favor of the annual election of directors. We believe that staggered boards are less accountable to shareholders than annually elected boards. Furthermore, we feel that the annual election of directors encourages board members to focus on protecting the interests of shareholders.
2
Many countries require companies to submit the annual financial statements, director reports and independent auditors reports to shareholders at a general meeting. Shareholder approval of such a proposal does not discharge the board or management. We will usually recommend voting in favor of these proposals except when there are concerns about the integrity of the statements/reports. However, should the audited financial statements, auditors report and/or annual report not be published at the writing of our report, we will recommend that shareholders abstain from voting on this proposal.
INCOME ALLOCATION (DISTRIBUTION OF DIVIDEND)
In many countries, companies must submit the allocation of income for shareholder approval. We will generally recommend voting for such a proposal. However, we will give particular scrutiny to cases where the companys dividend payout ratio is exceptionally low or excessively high relative to its peers and the company has not provided a satisfactory explanation.
APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS AND AUTHORITY TO SET FEES
We believe that role of the auditor is crucial in protecting shareholder value. Like directors, auditors should be free from conflicts of interest and should assiduously avoid situations that require them to make choices between their own interests and the interests of the shareholders.
We generally support managements recommendation regarding the selection of an auditor and support granting the board the authority to fix auditor fees except in cases where we believe the independence of an incumbent auditor or the integrity of the audit has been compromised. However, we recommend voting against ratification of the auditor and/or authorizing the board to set auditor fees for the following reasons:
|
When audit fees added to audit-related fees total less than one-half of total fees. |
|
When there have been any recent restatements or late filings by the company where the auditor bears some responsibility for the restatement or late filing (e.g., a restatement due to a reporting error). |
|
When the company has aggressive accounting policies. |
|
When the company has poor disclosure or lack of transparency in financial statements. |
|
When there are other relationships or issues of concern with the auditor that might suggest a conflict between the interest of the auditor and the interests of shareholders. |
|
When the company is changing auditors as a result of a disagreement between the company and the auditor on a matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures. |
3
COMPENSATION REPORT/COMPENSATION POLICY
We closely review companies remuneration practices and disclosure as outlined in company filings to evaluate management-submitted advisory compensation report and policy vote proposals. In evaluating these proposals, which can be binding or non-binding depending on the country, we examine how well the company has disclosed information pertinent to its compensation programs, the extent to which overall compensation is tied to performance, the performance metrics selected by the company and the levels of remuneration in comparison to company performance and that of its peers.
We will usually recommend voting against approval of the compensation report or policy when the following occur:
|
Gross disconnect between pay and performance; |
|
Performance goals and metrics are inappropriate or insufficiently challenging; |
|
Lack of disclosure regarding performance metrics and goals as well as the extent to which the performance metrics, targets and goals are implemented to enhance company performance and encourage prudent risk-taking; |
|
Excessive discretion afforded to or exercised by management or the compensation committee to deviate from defined performance metrics and goals in making awards; |
|
Ex gratia or other non-contractual payments have been made and the reasons for making the payments have not been fully explained or the explanation is unconvincing; |
|
Guaranteed bonuses are established; |
|
There is no clawback policy; or |
|
Egregious or excessive bonuses, equity awards or severance payments. |
Glass Lewis recognizes the value of equity-based incentive programs. When used appropriately, they can provide a vehicle for linking an employees pay to a companys performance, thereby aligning their interests with those of shareholders. Tying a portion of an employees compensation to the performance of the Company provides an incentive to maximize share value. In addition, equity-based compensation is an effective way to attract, retain and motivate key employees.
In order to allow for meaningful shareholder review, we believe that incentive programs should generally include: (i) specific and appropriate performance goals; (ii) a maximum award pool; and (iii) a maximum award amount per employee. In addition, the payments made should be reasonable relative to the performance of the business and total compensation to those covered by the plan should be in line with compensation paid by the Companys peers.
PERFORMANCE-BASED EQUITY COMPENSATION
Glass Lewis believes in performance-based equity compensation plans for senior executives. We feel that executives should be compensated with equity when their performance and that of the company warrants such rewards. While we do not believe that equity-based compensation plans for
4
all employees need to be based on overall company performance, we do support such limitations for grants to senior executives (although even some equity-based compensation of senior executives without performance criteria is acceptable, such as in the case of moderate incentive grants made in an initial offer of employment).
Boards often argue that such a proposal would hinder them in attracting talent. We believe that boards can develop a consistent, reliable approach, as boards of many companies have, that would still attract executives who believe in their ability to guide the company to achieve its targets. We generally recommend that shareholders vote in favor of performance-based option requirements. There should be no retesting of performance conditions for all share- and option- based incentive schemes. We will generally recommend that shareholders vote against performance-based equity compensation plans that allow for re-testing.
Glass Lewis believes that non-employee directors should receive appropriate types and levels of compensation for the time and effort they spend serving on the board and its committees. Director fees should be reasonable in order to retain and attract qualified individuals. In particular, we support compensation plans that include non performance-based equity awards, which help to align the interests of outside directors with those of shareholders.
Glass Lewis compares the costs of these plans to the plans of peer companies with similar market capitalizations in the same country to help inform its judgment on this issue.
RETIREMENT BENEFITS FOR DIRECTORS
We will typically recommend voting against proposals to grant retirement benefits to non-executive directors. Such extended payments can impair the objectivity and independence of these board members. Directors should receive adequate compensation for their board service through initial and annual fees.
LIMITS ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
As a general rule, Glass Lewis believes that shareholders should not be involved in setting executive compensation. Such matters should be left to the boards compensation committee. We view the election of directors, and specifically those who sit on the compensation committee, as the appropriate mechanism for shareholders to express their disapproval or support of board policy on this issue. Further, we believe that companies whose pay-for-performance is in line with their peers should be granted the flexibility to compensate their executives in a manner that drives growth and profit.
However, Glass Lewis favors performance-based compensation as an effective means of motivating executives to act in the best interests of shareholders. Performance-based compensation may be limited if a chief executives pay is capped at a low level rather than flexibly tied to the performance of the company.
5
AMENDMENTS TO THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
We will evaluate proposed amendments to a companys articles of association on a case-by-case basis. We are opposed to the practice of bundling several amendments under a single proposal because it prevents shareholders from evaluating each amendment on its own merits. In such cases, we will analyze each change individually and will recommend voting for the proposal only when we believe that the amendments on balance are in the best interests of shareholders.
POISON PILLS (SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLANS)
Glass Lewis believes that poison pill plans generally are not in the best interests of shareholders. Specifically, they can reduce management accountability by substantially limiting opportunities for corporate takeovers. Rights plans can thus prevent shareholders from receiving a buy-out premium for their stock.
We believe that boards should be given wide latitude in directing the activities of the company and charting the companys course. However, on an issue such as this where the link between the financial interests of shareholders and their right to consider and accept buyout offers is so substantial, we believe that shareholders should be allowed to vote on whether or not they support such a plans implementation.
In certain limited circumstances, we will support a limited poison pill to accomplish a particular objective, such as the closing of an important merger, or a pill that contains what we believe to be a reasonable qualifying offer clause.
SUPERMAJORITY VOTE REQUIREMENTS
Glass Lewis favors a simple majority voting structure. Supermajority vote requirements act as impediments to shareholder action on ballot items that are critical to our interests. One key example is in the takeover context where supermajority vote requirements can strongly limit shareholders input in making decisions on such crucial matters as selling the business.
Glass Lewis believes that having adequate capital stock available for issuance is important to the operation of a company. We will generally support proposals when a company could reasonably use the requested shares for financing, stock splits and stock dividends. While we think that having adequate shares to allow management to make quick decisions and effectively operate the business is critical, we prefer that, for significant transactions, management come to shareholders to justify their use of additional shares rather than providing a blank check in the form of large pools of unallocated shares available for any purpose.
In general, we will support proposals to increase authorized shares up to 100% of the number of shares currently authorized unless, after the increase the company would be left with less than 30% of its authorized shares outstanding.
6
Issuing additional shares can dilute existing holders in some circumstances. Further, the availability of additional shares, where the board has discretion to implement a poison pill, can often serve as a deterrent to interested suitors. Accordingly, where we find that the company has not disclosed a detailed plan for use of the proposed shares, or where the number of shares requested are excessive, we typically recommend against the issuance. In the case of a private placement, we will also consider whether the company is offering a discount to its share price.
In general, we will support proposals to issue shares (with pre-emption rights) when the requested increase is the lesser of (i) the unissued ordinary share capital; or (ii) a sum equal to one-third of the issued ordinary share capital. This authority should not exceed five years. In some countries, if the proposal contains a figure greater than one-third, the company should explain the nature of the additional amounts.
We will also generally support proposals to suspend pre-emption rights for a maximum of 5-20% of the issued ordinary share capital of the company, depending on the country in which the company is located. This authority should not exceed five years, or less for some countries.
We will recommend voting in favor of a proposal to repurchase shares when the plan includes the following provisions: (i) a maximum number of shares which may be purchased (typically not more than 15% of the issued share capital); and (ii) a maximum price which may be paid for each share (as a percentage of the market price).
7
V. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL RISK
We believe companies should actively evaluate risks to long-term shareholder value stemming from exposure to environmental and social risks and should incorporate this information into their overall business risk profile. In addition, we believe companies should consider their exposure to changes in environmental or social regulation with respect to their operations as well as related legal and reputational risks. Companies should disclose to shareholders both the nature and magnitude of such risks as well as steps they have taken or will take to mitigate those risks.
When we identify situations where shareholder value is at risk, we may recommend voting in favor of a reasonable and well-targeted shareholder proposal if we believe supporting the proposal will promote disclosure of and/or mitigate significant risk exposure. In limited cases where a company has failed to adequately mitigate risks stemming from environmental or social practices, we will recommend shareholders vote against: (i) ratification of board and/or management acts; (ii) approving a companys accounts and reports and/or; (iii) directors (in egregious cases).
8
DISCLAIMER
This document sets forth the proxy voting policy and guidelines of Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC. The policies included herein have been developed based on Glass Lewis experience with proxy voting and corporate governance issues and are not tailored to any specific person. Moreover, these guidelines are not intended to be exhaustive and do not include all potential voting issues. The information included herein is reviewed periodically and updated or revised as necessary. Glass Lewis is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. This document may not be reproduced or distributed in any manner without the written permission of Glass Lewis.
Copyright © 2013 Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC. All Rights Reserved.
9
SAN FRANCISCO
Headquarters
Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC
One Sansome Street
Suite 3300
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: +1 415-678-4110
Tel: +1 888-800-7001
Fax: +1 415-357-0200
NEW YORK
Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC
48 Wall Street
15th Floor
New York, N.Y. 10005
Tel: +1 212-797-3777
Fax: +1 212-980-4716
AUSTRALIA
CGI Glass Lewis Pty Limited
Suite 8.01, Level 8,
261 George St
Sydney NSW 2000
Australia
Tel: +61 2 9299 9266
Fax: +61 2 9299 1866
IRELAND
Glass Lewis Europe, Ltd.
6th Floor, Riverpoint
Bishops Quay
Limerick, Ireland
Phone: +353 61 404700
Fax: +353 61 404711
[Graphic Appears Here]
PART C: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 28. EXHIBITS.
(a) (1) | Certificate of Trust, dated January 27, 2009, of Schwab Strategic Trust (the Registrant or the Trust) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (a)(1) of the Registrants Registration Statement, filed July 15, 2009. | |
(a) (2) | Registrants Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust, dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (a)(3) of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 of the Registrants Registration Statement, filed October 27, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2). | |
(b) | Registrants By-Laws, dated January 26, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (b) of the Registrants Registration Statement, filed July 15, 2009. | |
(c) | Reference is made to Article 5 of the Registrants Agreement and Declaration of Trust. | |
(d) (1) | Advisory Agreement between the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (d) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of the Registrants Registration Statement, filed April 21, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as PEA No. 1). | |
(d) (2) | Amendment No. 1, dated July 26, 2010, to the Advisory Agreement between the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (d)(2) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 of the Registrants Registration Statement, filed July 23, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as PEA No. 3) | |
(d) (3) | Amendment No. 2, dated December 17, 2010, to the Advisory Agreement between the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (d)(3) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 of the Registrants Registration Statement, filed April 15, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as PEA No. 7). | |
(d) (4) | Amendment No. 3, dated July 1, 2011, to the Advisory Agreement between the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (d)(4) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 of the Registrants Registration Statement, filed July 8, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as PEA No. 12). | |
(d)(5) | Amendment No. 4, dated October 1, 2011, to the Advisory Agreement between the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (d)(5) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 of the Registrants Registration Statement, filed October 14, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as PEA No. 17). | |
(d)(6) | Amendment No. 5, dated September 20, 2012, to the Advisory Agreement between the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (d)(6) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 of the Registrants Registration Statement, filed on November 21, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as PEA No. 27). | |
(d)(7) | Amendment No. 6, dated March 11, 2013, to the Advisory Agreement between the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (d)(7) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 35 of the Registrants Registration Statement, filed on April 26, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as PEA No. 35). | |
(d)(8) | Amendment No. 7, dated August 8, 2013, to the Advisory Agreement between the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., dated October 12, 2009, is filed herein as Exhibit (d)(8). | |
(e) (1) | Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and SEI Investments Distribution Co. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (e) of PEA No. 1. |
1
(e) (2) | Amendment No. 1, dated July 26, 2010, to Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and SEI Investments Distribution Co., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (e)(2) of PEA No. 3. | |
(e) (3) | Amendment No. 2, dated December 17, 2010, to Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and SEI Investments Distribution Co., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (e)(3) of PEA No. 7. | |
(e) (4) | Amendment No. 3, dated July 1, 2011, to the Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and SEI Investments Distribution Co., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (e)(4) of PEA No. 12. | |
(e) (5) | Amendment No. 4, dated October 1, 2011, to the Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and SEI Investments Distribution Co., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (e)(5) of PEA No. 17. | |
(e) (6) | Amendment No. 5, dated August 8, 2013, to the Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and SEI Investments Distribution Co., dated October 12, 2009, is filed herein as Exhibit (e)(6). | |
(f) | Not applicable. | |
(g) (1) | Custodian Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 17, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (g)(1) of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 of Registrants Registration Statement, filed October 7, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1). | |
(g) (2) | Amendment, dated October 8, 2009, to the Custodian Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 17, 2005 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (g)(2) of PEA No. 1. | |
(g) (3) | Amendment, dated July 26, 2010, to the Custodian Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 17, 2005, filed September 24, 2010 (hereafter referred to as PEA No. 4) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (g)(3) of PEA No. 4. | |
(g) (4) | Amendment, dated December 17, 2010, to the Custodian Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 17, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (g)(4) of PEA No. 7. | |
(g) (5) | Amendment, dated July 1, 2011, to the Custodian Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 17, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (g)(5) of PEA No. 12. | |
(g) (6) | Amendment, dated October 1, 2011, to the Custodian Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 17, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (g)(6) of PEA No. 17. | |
(g) (7) | Amendment, dated August 8, 2013, to the Custodian Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 17, 2005, is filed herein as Exhibit (g)(7). | |
(h) (1) | Administration Agreement between the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc, dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(1) of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1. | |
(h) (1)(a) | Amendment No. 1, dated July 26, 2010, to the Administration Agreement between the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(8) of PEA No. 3. | |
(h) (1)(b) | Amendment No. 2, dated December 17, 2010, to the Administration Agreement between the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(1)(b) of PEA No. 7. | |
(h) (1)(c) | Amendment No. 3, dated July 1, 2011, to the Administration Agreement between the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(1)(c) of PEA No. 12. | |
(h) (1)(d) | Amendment No. 4, dated October 1, 2011, to the Administration Agreement between the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., dated October 12, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(1)(d) of PEA No. 17. |
2
(h) (1)(e) | Amendment No. 5, dated August 8, 2013, to the Administration Agreement between the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., dated October 12, 2009, is filed herein as Exhibit (h)(1)(e). | |
(h)(2) | Transfer Agency Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 8, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(2) of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1. | |
(h)(2)(a) | Amendment, dated July 26, 2010, to the Transfer Agency Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 8, 2009, filed September 24, 2010 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(9) of PEA No. 4. | |
(h)(2)(b) | Amendment, dated December 17, 2010, to the Transfer Agency Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 8, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(2)(b) of PEA No. 7. | |
(h)(2)(c) | Amendment, dated July 1, 2011, to the Transfer Agency Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 8, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(2)(c) of PEA No. 12. | |
(h)(2)(d) | Amendment, dated October 1, 2011, to the Transfer Agency Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 8, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(2)(d) of PEA No. 17. | |
(h)(2)(e) | Amendment, dated August 8, 2013, to the Transfer Agency Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 8, 2009, is filed herein as Exhibit (h)(2)(e). | |
(h) (3) | Authorized Participant Agreement is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(3) of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1. | |
(h)(4) | Master Fund Accounting and Services Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 1, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(4) of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1. | |
(h)(4)(a) | Amendment, dated October 8, 2009, to the Master Fund Accounting and Services Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 1, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(5) of PEA No. 1. | |
(h)(4)(b) | Amendment, dated July 26, 2010, to the Master Fund Accounting and Services Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 1, 2005, filed September 24, 2010 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (g)(10) of PEA No. 4. | |
(h)(4)(c) | Amendment, dated December 17, 2010, to the Master Fund Accounting and Services Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 1, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(4)(c) of PEA No. 7. | |
(h)(4)(d) | Amendment, dated July 1, 2011, to the Master Fund Accounting and Services Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 1, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(4)(d) of PEA No. 12. | |
(h)(4)(e) | Amendment, dated October 1, 2011, to the Master Fund Accounting and Services Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 1, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(4)(e) of PEA No. 17. | |
(h)(4)(f) | Amendment, dated August 8, 2013, to the Master Fund Accounting and Services Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 1, 2005, is filed herein as Exhibit (h)(4)(f). | |
(h)(5) | Sub-Administration Agreement between the Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 1, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(6) of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1. |
3
(h)(5)(a) | Amendment, dated October 8, 2009, to the Sub-Administration Agreement between the Charles Schwab Investment Management Company, Inc. and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 1, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(7) of PEA No. 1. | |
(h)(5)(b) | Amendment, dated July 26, 2010 to the Sub-Administration Agreement between the Charles Schwab Investment Management Company, Inc. and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 1, 2005, filed September 24, 2010 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (g)(11) of PEA No. 4. | |
(h)(5)(c) | Amendment, dated December 17, 2010, to the Sub-Administration Agreement between the Charles Schwab Investment Management Company, Inc. and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 1, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(5)(c) of PEA No. 7. | |
(h)(5)(d) | Amendment, dated July 1, 2011, to the Sub-Administration Agreement between the Charles Schwab Investment Management Company, Inc. and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 1, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(5)(d) of PEA No. 12. | |
(h)(5)(e) | Amendment, dated October 1, 2011, to the Sub-Administration Agreement between the Charles Schwab Investment Management Company, Inc. and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 1, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (h)(5)(e) of PEA No. 17. | |
(h)(5)(f) | Amendment, dated August 8, 2013, to the Sub-Administration Agreement between the Charles Schwab Investment Management Company, Inc. and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 1, 2005, is filed herein as Exhibit (h)(5)(f). | |
(i) | Opinion and Consent of Counsel is filed herein as Exhibit (i). | |
(j)(1) | Not applicable. | |
(j) (2) | Powers of Attorney for each of Walter W. Bettinger II, Robert W. Burns, Charles A. Ruffel, Mark A. Goldfarb, Marie Chandoha and George Pereira are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 of Registrants Registration Statement, filed December 8, 2010. | |
(j) (3) | Resolution Approving Power of Attorney filed September 24, 2010 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (j)(8) of PEA No. 4. | |
(j) (4) | Power of Attorney of Stephen Timothy Kochis is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (j)(9) of PEA No. 27. | |
(k) | Not applicable. | |
(l) | None. | |
(m) | Not applicable. | |
(n) | Not applicable. | |
(o) | Not applicable. | |
(p) (1) | Joint Code of Ethics for the Registrant and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., dated June 14, 2013 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (p)(1) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 41 of the Registrants Registration Statement, filed June 24, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as PEA No. 41). | |
(p) (2) | Code of Ethics of SEI Investments Distribution Co., dated October 3, 2012 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (p)(2) of PEA No. 27. |
ITEM 29. PERSONS CONTROLLED BY OR UNDER COMMON CONTROL WITH THE REGISTRANT.
One member of the Board of Trustees of the Registrant is also a member of the board of trustees of each of The Charles Schwab Family of Funds, Schwab Investments, Schwab Capital Trust, Schwab Annuity Portfolios, Laudus Trust and Laudus Institutional
4
Trust. Each such trust has Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. as its investment adviser. In addition, the officers of the Registrant are also identical to those of each such other trust, with the exception of the Chief Legal Officer. As a result, the above-named trusts may be deemed to be under common control with the Registrant. Nonetheless, the Registrant takes the position that it is not under common control with such other trusts because the power residing in the respective trusts boards and officers arises as a result of an official position with each such trust.
ITEM 30. INDEMNIFICATION.
Reference is made to Article VII of Registrants Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust (Exhibit (a)(2) filed October 27, 2009) and Article 11 of Registrants By-Laws (Exhibit (b) filed July 15, 2009).
Insofar as indemnification for liability arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Act), may be permitted to trustees, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a trustee, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
ITEM 31. BUSINESS AND OTHER CONNECTIONS OF INVESTMENT ADVISER.
The Registrants investment adviser, Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. (CSIM), a Delaware corporation, organized in October 1989, also serves as the investment manager to Laudus Institutional Trust, Laudus Trust, Schwab Capital Trust, The Charles Schwab Family of Funds, Schwab Investments, and Schwab Annuity Portfolios, each an open-end, management investment company. The principal place of business of the investment adviser is 211 Main Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. The only business in which the investment adviser engages is that of investment adviser and administrator to Schwab Capital Trust, The Charles Schwab Family of Funds, Schwab Investments, Schwab Annuity Portfolios and any other investment companies that Schwab may sponsor in the future, investment adviser to the Registrant, Laudus Trust and Laudus Institutional Trust and an investment adviser to certain non-investment company clients.
The business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature in which each director and/or senior or executive officer of CSIM is or has been engaged during the past two fiscal years is listed below. The name of any company for which any director and/or senior or executive officer of the investment adviser serves as director, officer, employee, partner or trustee is also listed below.
Name and Position with Adviser |
Name of Other Company |
Capacity |
||
Charles R. Schwab, Chairman and Director | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | Chairman and Director | ||
The Charles Schwab Bank, N.A. | Chairman and Director | |||
The Charles Schwab Corporation | Chairman and Director | |||
Schwab Holdings, Inc. | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director | |||
Schwab International Holdings, Inc. | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | |||
Schwab (SIS) Holdings, Inc. I | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | |||
Schwab Charitable Fund | Director | |||
Charles Schwab Foundation | Chairman and Director | |||
JustAnswer Corp. | Director | |||
Museum of American Finance | Advisory Board | |||
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art | Board of Trustees | |||
University of California San Francisco | Chancellors Executive Board | |||
Charles and Helen Schwab Foundation | Director | |||
Schwab Funds | Chairman and Trustee | |||
Laudus Funds | Chairman and Trustee |
5
Marie Chandoha, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | Executive Vice President and President | ||
Schwab Funds | President, Chief Executive Officer | |||
Laudus Funds | President, Chief Executive Officer | |||
Schwab ETFs | President, Chief Executive Officer | |||
Charles Schwab Worldwide Funds, PLC | Director | |||
Charles Schwab Asset Management (Ireland) Limited | Director | |||
Omar Aguilar, Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer Equities | Schwab Funds | Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer Equities | ||
Laudus Funds | Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer Equities | |||
Schwab ETFs | Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer Equities | |||
Brett Wander, Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer Fixed Income | Schwab Funds | Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer Fixed Income | ||
Laudus Funds | Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer Fixed Income | |||
Schwab ETFs | Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer Fixed Income | |||
David Lekich, Chief Counsel and Senior Vice President | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel | ||
Schwab Funds | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | |||
Laudus Funds | Vice President and Assistant Clerk | |||
Schwab ETFs | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | |||
Michael Hogan, Chief Compliance Officer | Schwab Funds | Chief Compliance Officer | ||
Schwab ETFs | Chief Compliance Officer | |||
Laudus Funds | Chief Compliance Officer | |||
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer | |||
George Pereira, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer | Schwab Funds | Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer | ||
Laudus Funds | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer | |||
Schwab ETFs | Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer | |||
Charles Schwab Worldwide Funds, PLC | Director | |||
Charles Schwab Asset Management (Ireland) Limited | Director |
ITEM 32. PRINCIPAL UNDERWRITER:
(a) SEI Investments Distribution Co. (the Distributor) is the principal underwriter of the Trust.
The Distributor acts as distributor for:
SEI Daily Income Trust
SEI Liquid Asset Trust
SEI Tax Exempt Trust
SEI Institutional Managed Trust
SEI Institutional International Trust
SEI Institutional Investments Trust
6
The Advisors Inner Circle Fund
The Advisors Inner Circle Fund II
Bishop Street Funds
SEI Asset Allocation Trust
CNI Charter Funds
Causeway Capital Management Trust
ProShares Trust
Community Reinvestment Act Qualified Investment Fund
SEI Alpha Strategy Portfolios, LP
TD Asset Management USA Funds
SEI Structured Credit Fund, LP
Wilshire Mutual Funds, Inc.
Wilshire Variable Insurance Trust
Global X Funds
ProShares Trust II
Exchange Traded Concepts Trust (formerly FaithShares Trust)
Schwab Strategic Trust
RiverPark Funds
Adviser Managed Trust
Huntington Strategy Shares
New Covenant Funds
(b) Information with respect to each director, officer or partner of each principal underwriter is as follows. Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each director or officer is 1 Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456.
Name |
Position and Office with Underwriter |
Positions and Offices with Registrant |
||
William M. Doran | Director | None | ||
Edward D. Loughlin | Director | None | ||
Wayne M. Withrow | Director | None | ||
Kevin Barr | President & Chief Executive Officer | None | ||
Maxine Chou | Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operations Officer, & Treasurer | None | ||
Karen LaTourette | Chief Compliance Officer, | None | ||
Anti-Money Laundering Officer & Assistant Secretary | ||||
John C. Munch | General Counsel & Secretary | None | ||
Mark J. Held | Senior Vice President | None | ||
Lori L. White | Vice President & Assistant Secretary | None | ||
John Coary | Vice President & Assistant Secretary | None | ||
John Cronin | Vice President | None | ||
Robert Silvestri | Vice President | None |
(c) None.
ITEM 33. LOCATION OF ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS.
All accounts, books and other documents required to be maintained by Section 31(a) of the 1940 Act, as amended, and the Rules thereunder will be maintained at the offices of:
1) Schwab Strategic Trust, 211 Main Street, San Francisco, CA 94105
2) Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., 211 Main Street, San Francisco, CA 94105
7
3) Principal Underwriter SEI Investments Distribution Co., 1 Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456
4) Custodian State Street Bank and Trust Company, One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111
5) Transfer Agent State Street Bank and Trust Company, One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111
ITEM 34. MANAGEMENT SERVICES.
None.
ITEM 35. UNDERTAKINGS.
Not applicable.
8
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the 1933 Act), and the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for the effectiveness of this Post Effective Amendment No. 46 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form N-1A pursuant to Rule 485(b) under the 1933 Act and has duly caused this Post Effective Amendment No. 46 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized, in the City of Washington in the District of Columbia, on the 8th day of August, 2013.
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST |
Registrant |
Marie Chandoha* |
Marie Chandoha, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the 1933 Act, this Post-Effective Amendment No. 46 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form N-1A has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities indicated this 8th day of August, 2013.
Signature |
Title |
|
Walter W. Bettinger, II* |
Chairman and Trustee | |
Walter W. Bettinger, II | ||
Robert W. Burns* |
Trustee | |
Robert W. Burns | ||
Stephen Timothy Kochis* |
Trustee | |
Stephen Timothy Kochis | ||
Charles A. Ruffel* |
Trustee | |
Charles A. Ruffel | ||
Marie Chandoha* |
President and Chief Executive Officer | |
Marie Chandoha | ||
George Pereira* |
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer | |
George Pereira |
*By: |
/s/ Douglas P. Dick |
|
Douglas P. Dick, Attorney-in-Fact | ||
Pursuant to Power of Attorney |
EXHIBIT INDEX
(d)(8) | Amendment No. 7, dated August 8, 2013, to the Advisory Agreement |
(e)(6) | Amendment No. 5, dated August 8, 2013, to the Distribution Agreement |
(g)(7) | Amendment, dated August 8, 2013, to the Custodian Agreement |
(h)(1)(e) | Amendment No. 5, dated August 8, 2013, to the Administration Agreement |
(h)(2)(e) | Amendment, dated August 8, 2013, to the Transfer Agency Agreement |
(h)(4)(f) | Amendment, dated August 8, 2013, to the Master Fund Accounting and Services Agreement |
(h)(5)(f) | Amendment, dated August 8, 2013, to the Sub-Administration Agreement |
(i) | Opinion and Consent of Counsel |
AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO
ADVISORY AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO ADVISORY AGREEMENT (this Amendment ), effective as of August 8, 2013, by and between Schwab Strategic Trust ( Trust ) and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. (the Adviser ).
WHEREAS, Trust and Adviser entered into an Advisory Agreement, dated October 12, 2009 (the Advisory Agreement ), pursuant to which Adviser serves as investment adviser to the Trust on behalf of the series set forth on Schedule A to the Advisory Agreement;
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend Schedule A to the Advisory Agreement to reflect additional series of the Trust:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, covenants, representations and warranties contained herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. | Schedule A of the Advisory Agreement is hereby amended to add the following Funds: |
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
A new Schedule A listing each of the Funds subject to the Advisory Agreement as of the date of this Amendment is hereby attached to this Amendment.
2. | Except as expressly amended and provided herein, all of the terms, conditions and provisions of the Advisory Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Advisory Agreement. |
3. | Entire Agreement . The Advisory Agreement as modified by this Amendment constitutes the entire agreement among the parties with respect to the subject matter contained herein and therein and may only be amended by a writing executed by all parties. |
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date set forth above.
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST, on behalf of each Fund listed on Schedule A | CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. | |||||||
By: |
/s/ George Pereira |
By: |
/s/ Marie Chandoha |
|||||
Name: | George Pereira | Name: | Marie Chandoha | |||||
Title: | Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
SCHEDULE A
to the
ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Dated as of October 12, 2009 between
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST and
CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.
As of August 8, 2013
The Trust will pay to the Adviser as compensation for the Advisers services rendered, a fee, computed daily, at an annual rate, based on the average daily net assets of the respective Fund, in accordance the following fee schedule:
Fund | Rate | |||
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF |
0.04 | %* | ||
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF |
0.04 | %* | ||
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF |
0.07 | %* | ||
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF |
0.07 | %* | ||
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF |
0.08 | %* | ||
Schwab International Equity ETF |
0.09 | %* | ||
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF |
0.20 | %* | ||
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF |
0.15 | %* | ||
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF |
0.07 | %* | ||
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF |
0.08 | %* | ||
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF |
0.10 | %* | ||
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF |
0.07 | %* | ||
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF |
0.07 | %* | ||
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF |
0.05 | %* | ||
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF |
0.07 | %* | ||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF |
0.32 | % | ||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF |
0.32 | % | ||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF |
0.32 | % | ||
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF |
0.32 | % | ||
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF] |
0.46 | % | ||
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF |
0.46 | % |
* | The Adviser will pay the operating expenses of the Fund, excluding interest expense, taxes, any brokerage expenses, and extraordinary or non-routine expenses. |
AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO
DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT (this Amendment ), effective as of August 8, 2013, by and between Schwab Strategic Trust ( Company ) and SEI Investments Distribution Co. ( SIDCO ).
WHEREAS:
1. | The Company and SIDCO entered into a Distribution Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2009 (the Distribution Agreement ), pursuant to which, among other things, SIDCO agreed to act as the Distributor with respect to issuance and distribution of Creation Units of each Fund; and |
2. | The parties hereto desire to further amend the Distribution Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions provided herein. |
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, covenants, representations and warranties contained herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. | Schedule A of the Distribution Agreement is hereby amended to add the following ETFs to the current List of Funds of the Trust: |
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
A new Schedule A listing each of the ETFs subject to the Distribution Agreement as of the date of this Amendment is hereby attached to this Amendment.
2. | Ratification of Agreement . Except as expressly amended and provided herein, all of the terms, conditions and provisions of the Distribution Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. |
3. | Counterparts . This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Each such counterpart shall be deemed an original, and it shall not be necessary in making proof of this Amendment to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. This Amendment shall be deemed executed by each party when any one or more counterparts hereof or thereof, individually or taken together, bears the original, facsimile or scanned signatures of each of the parties. |
4. | Entire Agreement . The Distribution Agreement as modified by this Amendment constitutes the entire agreement among the parties with respect to the subject matter contained herein and therein and may only be amended by a writing executed by all parties. |
5. | Governing Law . This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without giving effect to any conflict of laws or choice of laws rules or principles thereof. |
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date set forth above.
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST | SEI INVESTMENTS DISTRIBUTION CO. | |||||||
By: |
/s/ George Pereira |
By: |
/s/ Maxine J. Chou |
|||||
Name: | George Pereira | Name: | Maxine J. Chou | |||||
Title: | Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer | Title: | CFO & COO |
SCHEDULE A
LIST OF FUNDS
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Schwab International Equity ETF
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Schwab U.S. Broad Markets ETF
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
August 8, 2013
State Street Bank and Trust Company
1776 Heritage Drive
North Quincy, Massachusetts 02171
Attention: James M. Keenan, Senior Vice President, JAB 2/N
RE: Schwab Strategic Trust (the Trust )
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Master Custodian Agreement between us dated as of October 17, 2005, as amended and supplemented (the Agreement ). Pursuant to the Agreement, this letter is to provide notice of the creation of the following additional Schwab ETFs, as defined in the Amendment to the Agreement dated as of October 8, 2009 (the Amendment ):
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
In accordance with Section 5 of the Amendment, we request that you act as Custodian with respect to each additional Schwab ETF. A current Appendix A to the Agreement and Appendix B to the Amendment are attached hereto. In connection with such request, the Trust, on behalf of each of the additional Schwab ETFs, hereby confirms to you, as of the date hereof, the representations and warranties set forth in Section 18.7 of the Agreement.
Please indicate your acceptance of the foregoing by executing two copies of this letter, returning one to the Trust and retaining one copy for your records.
Very truly yours,
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST | ||
By: |
/s/ George Pereira |
|
Name: | George Pereira | |
Title: | Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer |
Accepted:
STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY | ||
By: |
/s/ Michael F. Rogers |
|
Name: | Michael F. Rogers | |
Title: | Executive Vice President |
APPENDIX A
TO THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED MASTER CUSTODIAN AGREEMENT
As of August 8, 2013
THE CHARLES SCHWAB FAMILY OF FUNDS
Schwab Money Market Fund
Schwab Value Advantage Money Fund
Schwab Retirement Advantage Money Fund
Schwab Investor Money Fund
Schwab Government Money Fund
Schwab U.S. Treasury Money Fund
Schwab Municipal Money Fund
Schwab California Municipal Money Fund
Schwab New York AMT Tax-Free Money Fund (formerly NY Muni Money Fund)
Schwab AMT Tax-Free Money Fund (formerly Florida Muni Money Fund)
Schwab California AMT Tax-Free Money Fund
Schwab Massachusetts AMT Tax-Free Money Fund (formerly MA Muni Money Fund)
Schwab Pennsylvania Municipal Money Fund
Schwab New Jersey AMT Tax-Free Money Fund (formerly NJ Muni Money Fund)
Schwab Cash Reserves
Schwab Advisor Cash Reserves
Schwab Treasury Obligations Money Fund
SCHWAB INVESTMENTS
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
Schwab Short-Term Bond Market Fund
Schwab Total Bond Market Fund
Schwab GNMA Fund
Schwab Tax-Free Bond Fund
Schwab California Tax-Free Bond Fund
Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (formerly Schwab Inflation Protected Fund)
Schwab Intermediate-Term Bond Fund
SCHWAB CAPITAL TRUST
Schwab Core Equity Fund
Schwab Hedged Equity Fund
Schwab Premier Equity Fund
Laudus International MarketMasters Fund
Laudus Small-Cap MarketMasters Fund
Schwab Balanced Fund (formerly Schwab Viewpoints Fund)
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
Schwab Monthly Income Fund - Moderate Payout
Schwab Monthly Income Fund - Enhanced Payout
Schwab Monthly Income Fund - Maximum Payout
Schwab International Core Equity Fund
SCHWAB ANNUITY PORTFOLIOS
Schwab Money Market Portfolio
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Schwab International Equity ETF
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
APPENDIX B
TO THE AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED MASTER CUSTODIAN AGREEMENT
As of August 8, 2013
List of Schwab ETFs
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Schwab International Equity ETF
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab U.S REIT ETF
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO
ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT (this Amendment ), effective as of August 8, 2013, by and between Schwab Strategic Trust ( Trust ) and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. (the Administrator ).
WHEREAS, Trust and Administrator entered into an Administration Agreement, dated October 12, 2009 (the Administration Agreement), pursuant to which Administrator provides administrative and accounting services to the Trust on behalf of the series set forth on Schedule I to the Administration Agreement;
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend Schedule I to the Administration Agreement to reflect additional series of the Trust.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, covenants, representations and warranties contained herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. | Schedule I of the Administration Agreement is hereby amended to add the following Portfolios: |
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
A new Schedule I listing each of the Portfolios subject to the Administration Agreement as of the date of this Amendment is hereby attached to this Amendment.
2. | Except as expressly amended and provided herein, all of the terms, conditions and provisions of the Administration Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Administration Agreement. |
3. | Entire Agreement . The Administration Agreement as modified by this Amendment constitutes the entire agreement among the parties with respect to the subject matter contained herein and therein and may only be amended by a writing executed by all parties. |
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date set forth above.
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST, on behalf of each Fund listed on Schedule A | CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. | |||||||
By: |
/s/ George Pereira |
By: |
/s/ Marie Chandoha |
|||||
Name: | George Pereira | Name: | Marie Chandoha | |||||
Title: | Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
SCHEDULE I
to the
ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT
Dated as of October 12, 2009 between
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST and
CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.
As of August 8, 2013
Portfolios
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Schwab International Equity ETF
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
August 8, 2013
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
Attention: Sheila McClorey, Transfer Agent Vice President
RE: Schwab Strategic Trust (the Trust )
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Reference is made to the Transfer Agency and Service Agreement between us, dated as of October 8, 2009 (the Agreement ). Pursuant to the Agreement, this letter is to provide notice of the creation of the following additional Portfolios, as defined in the Agreement:
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
In accordance with the Additional Portfolios provision of Section 13 of the Agreement, we request that you act as Transfer Agent with respect to each additional Portfolio. A current Schedule A to the Agreement is attached hereto. In connection with such request, the undersigned, on behalf of the Trust and the additional Portfolios, hereby confirms to you, as of the date hereof, the representations and warranties set forth in Section 4 of the Agreement.
Please indicate your acceptance of the foregoing by executing two copies of this letter, returning one to the Trust and retaining one copy for your records.
Very truly yours,
CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. | ||
By: |
/s/ George Pereira |
|
Name: | George Pereira | |
Title: | Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer | |
Accepted: | ||
STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY | ||
By: |
/s/ Michael F. Rogers |
|
Name: | Michael F. Rogers | |
Title: | Executive Vice President |
SCHEDULE A
LIST OF PORTFOLIOS
As of August 8, 2013
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Schwab International Equity ETF
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
August 8, 2013
State Street Bank and Trust Company
1776 Heritage Drive
North Quincy, Massachusetts 02171
Attention: James M. Keenan, Senior Vice President, JAB 2/N
RE: Schwab Strategic Trust (the Trust )
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Reference is made to the Master Fund Accounting and Services Agreement between us dated as of October 1, 2005, as amended and supplemented (the Agreement ). Pursuant to the Agreement, this letter is to provide notice of the creation of the following additional Schwab ETFs, as defined in the Amendment to the Agreement dated as of October 8, 2009 (the Amendment ):
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
In accordance with Section 3 of the Amendment, we request that you act as Accounting Agent with respect to each additional Schwab ETF. A current Appendix A to the Agreement and Appendix B to the Amendment are attached hereto. In connection with such request, the Trust, on behalf of each of the additional Schwab ETFs, hereby confirms to you, as of the date hereof, the representations and warranties set forth in Section 4(b) of the Agreement.
Please indicate your acceptance of the foregoing by executing two copies of this letter, returning one to the Trust and retaining one copy for your records.
Very truly yours,
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST | ||
By: |
/s/ George Pereira |
|
Name: | George Pereira | |
Title: | Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer | |
Accepted: | ||
STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY | ||
By: |
/s/ Michael F. Rogers |
|
Name: | Michael F. Rogers | |
Title: | Executive Vice President |
APPENDIX A
TO
MASTER FUND ACCOUNTING AND SERVICES AGREEMENT
As of August 8, 2013
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES AND PORTFOLIOS THEREOF, IF ANY
THE CHARLES SCHWAB FAMILY OF FUNDS
Schwab Money Market Fund
Schwab Value Advantage Money Fund
Schwab Retirement Advantage Money Fund
Schwab Investor Money Fund
Schwab Government Money Fund
Schwab U.S. Treasury Money Fund
Schwab Municipal Money Fund
Schwab California Municipal Money Fund
Schwab New York AMT Tax-Free Money Fund (formerly NY Muni Money Fund)
Schwab AMT Tax-Free Money Fund (formerly Florida Muni Money Fund)
Schwab California AMT Tax-Free Money Fund
Schwab Massachusetts AMT Tax-Free Money Fund (formerly MA Muni Money Fund)
Schwab Pennsylvania Municipal Money Fund
Schwab New Jersey AMT Tax-Free Money Fund (formerly NJ Muni Money Fund)
Schwab Cash Reserves
Schwab Advisor Cash Reserves
Schwab Treasury Obligations Money Fund
SCHWAB INVESTMENTS
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
Schwab Short-Term Bond Market Fund
Schwab Total Bond Market Fund
Schwab GNMA Fund
Schwab Tax-Free Bond Fund
Schwab California Tax-Free Bond Fund
Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (formerly Schwab Inflation Protected Fund)
Schwab Global Real Estate Fund
Schwab Intermediate-Term Bond Fund
SCHWAB CAPITAL TRUST
Schwab International Index Fund
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund
Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio
Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio
Schwab MarketTrack Conservative Portfolio
Schwab MarketTrack All Equity Portfolio
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
Schwab Dividend Equity Fund
Schwab Small-Cap Equity Fund
Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund
Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund
Schwab Financial Services Fund
Schwab Health Care Fund
Schwab Target 2010 Fund
Schwab Target 2015 Fund
Schwab Target 2020 Fund
Schwab Target 2025 Fund
Schwab Target 2030 Fund
Schwab Target 2035 Fund
Schwab Target 2040 Fund
Schwab Core Equity Fund
Schwab Hedged Equity Fund
Laudus International MarketMasters Fund
Laudus Small-Cap MarketMasters Fund
Schwab Balanced Fund (formerly Schwab Viewpoints Fund)
Schwab Fundamental US Small-Mid Company Index Fund
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index Fund
Schwab Monthly Income Fund - Moderate Payout
Schwab Monthly Income Fund - Enhanced Payout
Schwab Monthly Income Fund - Maximum Payout
Schwab International Core Equity Fund
SCHWAB ANNUITY PORTFOLIOS
Schwab Money Market Portfolio
Schwab S&P 500 Index Portfolio
Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio II
Schwab VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schwab VIT Balanced with Growth Portfolio
Schwab VIT Growth Portfolio
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Schwab International Equity ETF
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
APPENDIX B
TO AMENDMENT TO
MASTER FUND ACCOUNTING AND SERVICES AGREEMENT
As of August 8, 2013
List of Schwab ETFs
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Schwab International Equity ETF
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
August 8, 2013
State Street Bank and Trust Company
1776 Heritage Drive
North Qunicy, MA 02171
Attn: James M Keenan, SVP (JAB/2N)
RE: Schwab Strategic Trust (the Trust )
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Reference is made to the Sub-Administration Agreement between us dated as of October 1, 2005, as amended and supplemented (the Agreement ). Pursuant to the Agreement, this letter is to provide notice of the creation of the following additional Schwab ETFs, as defined in the Amendment to the Agreement dated as of October 8, 2009 (the Amendment ):
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
In accordance with the Section 2 of the Amendment, we request that you act as Sub-Administrator with respect to each additional Schwab ETF. A current Appendix A to the Agreement and Appendix B to the Amendment are attached hereto. In connection with such request, the undersigned, on behalf of the Trust and the additional Schwab ETFs, hereby confirms to you, as of the date hereof, its representations and warranties set forth in Section 4 of the Agreement.
Please indicate your acceptance of the foregoing by executing two copies of this letter, returning one to the Trust and retaining one copy for your records.
Very truly yours,
CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. | ||
By: |
/s/ George Pereira |
|
Name: | George Pereira | |
Title: | Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer | |
Accepted: | ||
STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY | ||
By: |
/s/ Michael F. Rogers |
|
Name: | Michael F. Rogers | |
Title: | Executive Vice President |
SUB-ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT
As of August 8, 2013
SCHEDULE A
Listing of Investment Funds
SCHWAB CAPITAL TRUST
Schwab International Index Fund
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund
Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio
Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio
Schwab MarketTrack Conservative Portfolio
Schwab MarketTrack All Equity Portfolio
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
Schwab Dividend Equity Fund
Schwab Small-Cap Equity Fund
Schwab Large Cap Growth Fund
Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund
Schwab Financial Services Fund
Schwab Health Care Fund
Schwab Target 2040 Fund
Schwab Target 2030 Fund
Schwab Target 2020 Fund
Schwab Target 2010 Fund
Schwab Core Equity Fund
Schwab Hedged Equity Fund
Schwab Balanced Fund (formerly Schwab Viewpoints Fund)
Laudus International MarketMasters Fund
Laudus Small-Cap MarketMasters Fund
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund
Schwab Fundamental International Small-Mid Company Index Fund
Schwab Target 2015 Fund
Schwab Target 2025 Fund
Schwab Target 2035 Fund
Schwab Monthly Income Fund Moderate Payout
Schwab Monthly Income Fund Enhanced Payout
Schwab Monthly Income Fund Maximum Payout
Schwab International Core Equity Fund
Schwab Target 2045 Fund
Schwab Target 2050 Fund
Schwab Target 2055 Fund
SCHWAB ANNUITY PORTFOLIOS
Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio II
Schwab S&P500 Portfolio
Schwab Money Market Portfolio
Schwab VIT Balanced Portfolio
Schwab VIT Balanced with Growth Portfolio
Schwab VIT Growth Portfolio
CHARLES SCHWAB FAMILY OF FUNDS
Schwab Money Market Fund
Schwab Value Advantage Money Fund
Schwab Retirement Advantage Money Fund
Schwab Investor Money Fund (formerly Schwab Retirement Money Fund)
Schwab Government Money Fund
Schwab U.S. Treasury Money Fund
Schwab Municipal Money Fund
Schwab California Municipal Money Fund
Schwab New York AMT Tax-Free Money Fund (formerly Schwab New York Municipal Money Fund)
Schwab AMT Tax-Free Money Fund (formerly known as Schwab Florida Municipal Money Fund)
Schwab Massachusetts AMT Tax-Free Money Fund (formerly Schwab Massachusetts Municipal Money Fund)
Schwab Pennsylvania Municipal Money Fund
Schwab New Jersey AMT Tax-Free Money Fund (formerly Schwab New Jersey Municipal Money Fund)
Schwab Cash Reserves Fund
Schwab Advisor Cash Reserves Fund
Schwab California AMT Tax-Free Money Fund
Schwab Treasury Obligations Money Fund
SCHWAB INVESTMENTS
Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (formerly Schwab Inflation Protected Fund)
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
Schwab Short-Term Bond Market Fund
Schwab Total Bond Market Fund
Schwab California Tax Free Bond Fund (formerly Schwab California Short/Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Fund)
Schwab Tax-Free Bond Fund (formerly Schwab Long-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund)
Schwab GNMA Fund
Schwab Global Real Estate Fund
Schwab Intermediate-Term Bond Fund
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Schwab International Equity ETF
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
APPENDIX B
TO
AMENDMENT TO SUB-ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT
As of August 8, 2013
List of Schwab ETFs
SCHWAB STRATEGIC TRUST
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Schwab International Equity ETF
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
|
1900 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 +1 202 261 3300 Main +1 202 261 3333 Fax www.dechert.com
|
August 8, 2013
Schwab Strategic Trust
211 Main Street
San Francisco, California 94105
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as counsel for Schwab Strategic Trust (the Trust), a trust duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, in connection with Post-Effective Amendment No. 46 to the Trusts Registration Statement on Form N-1A (the Registration Statement) relating to the issuance and sale by the Trust of an indefinite number of shares of beneficial interest of the Trust, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. We have examined such governmental and corporate certificates and records as we deemed necessary to render this opinion and we are familiar with the Trusts Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust and its By-Laws, each as amended to date.
Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the shares proposed to be sold pursuant to the Registration Statement, when paid for as contemplated in the Registration Statement, will be legally and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement, to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and to the use of our name in the Trusts Registration Statement to be dated on or about August 8, 2013 and in any revised or amended versions thereof. In giving such consent, however, we do not admit that we are within the category of persons whose consent is required by Section 7 of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
Very truly yours, |
/s/ Dechert LLP |