NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include Belden Inc. and all of its subsidiaries (the Company, Belden, us, we, or our). We eliminate all significant affiliate accounts and transactions in consolidation.

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented as of any date other than December 31, 2012:

These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data contained in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Business Description

Belden designs, manufactures, and markets signal transmission solutions for the broadcast, enterprise, and industrial markets. Our products are designed and manufactured to strict quality standards resulting in an industry leading reputation for worldwide reliability.

Reporting Periods

Our fiscal year and fiscal fourth quarter both end on December 31. Our fiscal first quarter ends on the Sunday falling closest to 91 days after December 31, which was March 31, 2013, the 90th day of our fiscal year 2013. Our fiscal second quarter has 91 days and ended on June 30, 2013. Our fiscal third quarter has 91 days and ended on September 29, 2013. The nine months ended September 29, 2013 and September 30, 2012 included 272 and 274 days, respectively.

Reclassifications

We have made certain reclassifications to the 2012 Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements with no impact to reported net income in order to conform to the 2013 presentation, primarily related to discontinued operations of a disposed business.

Fair Value Measurement

Accounting guidance for fair value measurements specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based upon whether the inputs to those valuation techniques reflect assumptions other market participants would use based upon market data obtained from independent sources or reflect our own assumptions of market participant valuation. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:

-5-

As of and for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2013 and September 30, 2012, we utilized Level 1 inputs to determine the fair value of cash equivalents. As of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we utilized level 2 inputs to determine the fair value of certain long-lived assets (see Note 6). For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we utilized Level 2 inputs to determine the fair value of derivatives and hedging instruments (see Note 9). We did not have any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the year.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We classify cash on hand and deposits in banks, including commercial paper, money market accounts, and other investments with an original maturity of three months or less, that we hold from time to time, as cash and cash equivalents. We periodically have cash equivalents consisting of short-term money market funds and other investments. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve our capital for the purpose of funding operations. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes. The fair value of these cash equivalents as of September 29, 2013 was $70.4 million and is based on quoted market prices in active markets (i.e., Level 1 valuation).

Contingent Liabilities

We have established liabilities for environmental and legal contingencies that are probable of occurrence and reasonably estimable, the amounts of which are currently not material. We accrue environmental remediation costs based on estimates of known environmental remediation exposures developed in consultation with our environmental consultants and legal counsel. We are, from time to time, subject to routine litigation incidental to our business. These lawsuits primarily involve claims for damages arising out of the use of our products, allegations of patent or trademark infringement, and litigation and administrative proceedings involving employment matters and commercial disputes. Based on facts currently available, we believe the disposition of the claims that are pending or asserted will not have a materially adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flow.

As of September 29, 2013, we were party to standby letters of credit, bank guaranties, and surety bonds totaling $7.0 million, $4.9 million, and $1.7 million, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when all of the following circumstances are satisfied: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) price is fixed or determinable, (3) collectability is reasonably assured, and (4) delivery has occurred. Delivery occurs in the period in which the customer takes title and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership of the products specified in the customer’s purchase order or sales agreement. At times, we enter into arrangements that involve the delivery of multiple products. For these arrangements, revenue is allocated to each deliverable based on that element’s relative selling price and recognized based on the period of delivery for each element.

-6-

We record revenue net of estimated rebates, price allowances, invoicing adjustments, and product returns. We record revisions to these estimates in the period in which the facts that give rise to each revision become known.

Discontinued Operations

In 2012, we sold our Thermax and Raydex cable business, and the results of operations of Thermax and Raydex in 2012 are reported in discontinued operations. Operating results from discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 include revenues of $25.1 million and $75.6 million, respectively, and income of $5.7 million ($4.5 million net of tax) and $17.8 million ($11.7 million net of tax), respectively, from Thermax and Raydex.

In 2010, we completed the sale of Trapeze Networks, Inc. (Trapeze) for $152.1 million. At the time the transaction closed, we received $136.9 million in cash, and the remaining $15.2 million was placed in escrow as partial security for our indemnity obligations under the sale agreement. Based on the status of the negotiations at the time, we reduced the carrying value of the escrow receivable and recognized a loss of $7.0 million ($4.3 million net of tax) for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, which is included in our gain from disposal of discontinued operations. As of September 29, 2013, we have collected a partial settlement of $4.2 million from the escrow, and we remain in negotiations with the buyer of Trapeze regarding the status of the escrow and certain claims raised by the buyer. Based on the current status of the negotiations, the amount of the escrow receivable on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet is $3.8 million, which is our best estimate of the remaining amount to be collected.

During 2005, we completed the sale of our discontinued communications cable operation in Phoenix, Arizona. In connection with this sale and related tax deductions, we established a liability for uncertain tax positions. The statute of limitations associated with the tax positions expired during our fiscal third quarter of 2012. Therefore, we reversed the uncertain tax position liability and the associated accrued interest and penalties. For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recognized a net gain of $14.1 million due to the reversal of the uncertain tax position liability, which is included in our gain from disposal of discontinued operations. For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recognized a gain of $4.0 million ($2.6 million net of tax) due to the reversal of the accrued interest and penalties, which is included in our income from discontinued operations.

Subsequent Events

We have evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date through the financial statement issuance date for appropriate accounting and disclosure. See Note 14.

Current-Year Adoption of Accounting Pronouncements

On January 1, 2013, we adopted new accounting guidance issued by the FASB with regard to the presentation and disclosure of changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

Pending Adoption of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2013, the FASB issued guidance which requires the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits net of deferred tax assets for net operating loss carryforwards, similar tax losses, or tax credit carryforwards in cases where these carryforwards and losses are available at the balance sheet date. When carryforwards or losses are not available at the balance sheet date, an entity must present the liability separately, rather than on a net basis with deferred tax assets. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2013. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our financial statements.

-7-

Note 2: Acquisitions

Softel Limited

We acquired Softel Limited (Softel) for $9.1 million, net of cash acquired, on January 25, 2013. Softel is a key technology supplier to the media sector with a portfolio of technologies well aligned with industry trends and growing demand. Softel is located in the United Kingdom. The results of Softel have been included in our Consolidated Financial Statements from January 25, 2013, and are reported within the Broadcast segment. The Softel acquisition was not material to our financial position or results of operations reported as of and for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2013.

PPC Broadband, Inc.

We acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of PPC Broadband, Inc. (PPC) in exchange for cash of $522.4 million on December 10, 2012. PPC is a leading manufacturer and developer of advanced connectivity technologies for the broadband market and expands our solution offerings in the broadband end-market. PPC is headquartered in Syracuse, New York. PPC’s strong brands and technology enhance our portfolio of broadband products. The results of PPC have been included in our Consolidated Financial Statements from December 10, 2012, and are reported within the Broadcast segment. The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed as of December 10, 2012 (in thousands).

The above purchase price allocation has been determined provisionally, and is subject to revision as additional information about the fair value of individual assets and liabilities becomes available and we ensure our accounting policies are applied at PPC. The provisional measurement of receivables, inventories, property, plant, and equipment, goodwill, deferred income taxes, and other assets and liabilities are subject to change. Any change in the acquisition date fair value of the acquired net assets will change the amount of the purchase price allocable to goodwill.

A single estimate of fair value results from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and relies heavily on estimates and assumptions. The judgments we have used in estimating the fair values assigned to each class of acquired assets and assumed liabilities could materially affect the results of our operations.

The fair value of acquired receivables is $27.0 million, with a gross contractual amount of $27.7 million. We do not expect to collect $0.7 million of the acquired receivables.

-8-

For purposes of the above allocation, we have estimated a fair value adjustment for inventories based on the estimated selling price of the work-in-process and finished goods acquired at the closing date less the sum of the costs to complete the work-in-process, the costs of disposal, and a reasonable profit allowance for our post acquisition selling efforts. We based our estimate of the fair value for the acquired property, plant, and equipment on a valuation study performed by a third party valuation firm. We used various valuation methods including discounted cash flows to estimate the fair value of the identifiable intangible assets.

Goodwill and other intangible assets reflected above were determined to meet the criterion for recognition apart from tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The goodwill is primarily attributable to expected synergies and the assembled workforce. Our tax basis in the acquired goodwill is $277.3 million. The goodwill balance we recorded is deductible for tax purposes up to the amount of the tax basis. Intangible assets related to the PPC acquisition consisted of the following:

Trademarks have been determined by us to have indefinite lives and are not being amortized, based on our expectation that the trademarked products will generate cash flows for us for an indefinite period. We expect to maintain use of trademarks on existing products and introduce new products in the future that will also display the trademarks, thus extending their lives indefinitely. In-process research and development assets are considered indefinite-lived intangible assets until the completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. Upon completion of the development process, we will make a determination of the useful life of the asset and begin amortizing it over that period. If the project is abandoned, we will write-off the asset at such time.

The amortizable intangible assets reflected in the table above were determined by us to have finite lives. The useful life for the developed technologies intangible asset was based on the estimated time that the technology provides us with a competitive advantage and thus approximates the period of consumption of the intangible asset. The useful life for the customer relationship intangible asset was based on our forecasts of customer turnover. The useful life of the backlog intangible asset was based on our estimate of when the ordered items would ship.

Miranda Technologies Inc.

We acquired Miranda Technologies Inc. (Miranda) for cash of $374.7 million in July 2012. The results of Miranda are reported within the Broadcast segment. The purchase price allocation was finalized with no significant changes as compared to December 31, 2012.

Pro forma – PPC and Miranda

-9-

The following table illustrates the unaudited pro forma effect on operating results as if the Miranda and PPC acquisitions had been completed as of January 1, 2011.

For purposes of the unaudited pro forma disclosures, the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 include interest expense from the term loan borrowed to finance the acquisition of Miranda and from the borrowings under our senior secured credit facility to finance the acquisition of PPC.

The above unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and does not purport to represent what our results of operations would have been had we completed the acquisitions on the date assumed, nor is it necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in future periods. Pro forma adjustments exclude cost savings from any synergies resulting from the acquisitions.

Note 3: Operating Segments

In 2013, we re-organized the Company around four global business platforms: Broadcast, Enterprise Connectivity, Industrial Connectivity, and Industrial IT. Previously, we were organized around geographic regions. The re-organization was executed as a result of our transformation into a global provider of comprehensive signal transmission solutions. We believe the new organization will allow us to better capitalize on market opportunities and meet customer demands. We have determined that each of the global business platforms represents a reportable segment. We have revised the prior period segment information to conform to the change in the composition of our reportable segments. The All Other segment represents the financial results of our cable operations that primarily conducted business in the consumer electronics end market, which we sold in December 2012.

We allocate corporate expenses to the segments for purposes of measuring segment operating income. Corporate expenses are allocated on the basis of each segment’s relative operating income prior to the allocation, adjusted for certain items including asset impairment, severance and other restructuring costs, purchase accounting effects related to acquisitions, accelerated depreciation, and amortization of intangible assets.

-10-

Total segment assets do not include cash, goodwill and intangible assets, deferred tax assets, or corporate assets.

The following table is a reconciliation of the total of the reportable segments’ operating income (loss) to consolidated income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes.

For both the three and nine months ended September 29, 2013, diluted weighted average shares outstanding do not include outstanding equity awards of 0.3 million, because to do so would have been anti-dilutive. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, diluted weighted average shares outstanding do not include outstanding equity awards of 1.8 million and 1.0 million, respectively, because to do so would have been anti-dilutive.

For purposes of calculating basic earnings per share, unvested restricted stock units are not included in the calculation of basic weighted average shares outstanding until all necessary conditions have been satisfied and issuance of the shares underlying the restricted stock units is no longer contingent. Necessary conditions are not satisfied until the vesting date, at which time holders of our restricted stock units receive shares of our common stock.

For purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share, unvested restricted stock units are included to the extent that they are dilutive. In determining whether unvested restricted stock units are dilutive, each issuance of restricted stock units is considered separately.

Once a restricted stock unit has vested, it is included in the calculation of both basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding.

Note 6: Long-Lived Assets

Disposals

During the nine months ended September 29, 2013, we sold certain real estate of the Broadcast segment for $1.0 million and recognized a $0.3 million loss on the sale. We also sold certain real estate of the Enterprise Connectivity segment for $2.1 million. There was no gain or loss on the sale.

-12-

In 2012, we sold our cable operations that primarily conducted business in the consumer electronics end market in China. For the nine months ended September 29, 2013, we recorded a $1.3 million gain on the sale due to a favorable resolution with the buyer of those assets regarding the closing date working capital. See further discussion below.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we sold certain real estate of the Enterprise Connectivity segment for $0.8 million. There was no gain or loss recognized on the sale.

Impairment

During our fiscal third quarter of 2012, we recognized an impairment loss of $26.0 million on certain net assets of our Chinese cable operations that primarily conducted business in the consumer electronics end market. We subsequently sold the assets in our fiscal fourth quarter of 2012. The impairment loss is included in the operating results of the All Other segment. Of the total impairment loss, $10.6 million, $6.8 million, and $5.2 million related to property, plant, and equipment, customer relationships, and trademarks, respectively. We estimated the fair market value of these assets based upon the purchase price per the terms of the sale agreement. The remainder of the impairment loss was due to the accrual of estimated costs to sell, including such items as investment banker fees, legal fees, and other closing costs.

For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recognized an impairment loss on property, plant and equipment of $2.5 million and $1.5 million in the operating results of our Industrial Connectivity and Enterprise Connectivity segments, respectively. Of the total impairment loss, approximately $1.5 million related to real estate retained by us from a German cable business we sold in 2009 and leased to the purchasers, $1.4 million related to manufacturing equipment, and $1.1 million related to other property, plant, and equipment. We estimated the fair value of these assets based upon bids received from third parties to potentially buy the assets, quoted prices in active markets or quoted prices for similar assets.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

We recognized depreciation expense in income from continuing operations of $11.7 million and $33.5 million in the three and nine months ended September 29, 2013, respectively. Depreciation expense for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2013 included $2.2 million and $4.9 million, respectively, of accelerated depreciation expense. The accelerated depreciation expense related to a change in useful lives of certain assets as a result of our decision to consolidate manufacturing facilities as we integrate PPC. We recognized depreciation expense in income from continuing operations of $8.8 million and $26.1 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.

We recognized amortization expense in income from continuing operations related to our intangible assets of $12.3 million and $38.4 million in the three and nine months ended September 29, 2013, respectively. We recognized amortization expense in income from continuing operations related to our intangible assets of $7.6 million and $13.1 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.

Note 7: Restructuring Activities

For the three and nine months ended September 29, 2013, we recorded severance and other restructuring costs of $3.8 million and $9.5 million, respectively. The majority of these costs were recorded in our Broadcast segment, which recognized $3.2 million and $7.6 million of severance and other restructuring costs for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2013, respectively. The other restructuring costs included relocation, equipment transfer, and other costs. These costs were incurred primarily as a result of facility consolidation in New York for recently acquired locations and other acquisition integration activities. The majority of the remaining severance and other restructuring costs were recorded in our Industrial IT segment.

-13-

Of the total severance and other restructuring costs recognized for the three months ended September 29, 2013, $1.9 million, $1.6 million, and $0.3 million were included in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses, and research and development, respectively. Of the total severance and other restructuring costs recognized for the nine months ended September 29, 2013, $5.0 million, $3.2 million, and $1.3 million were included in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses, and research and development, respectively. We expect the majority of the costs related to these actions will be paid in 2013.

We expect to incur additional severance and other restructuring costs in 2013 of approximately $4 million as a result of the Broadcast activities discussed above. We continue to review our business strategies and evaluate potential new restructuring actions. This could result in additional restructuring costs in future periods.

In our fiscal third quarter of 2012, we implemented certain restructuring actions in response to the uncertain global economic environment. For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recognized severance and other restructuring costs in our Broadcast, Enterprise Connectivity, Industrial Connectivity, and Industrial IT segments of $4.4 million, $3.2 million, $9.2 million, and $0.5 million, respectively. The other restructuring costs consisted primarily of contract termination costs related to our supply chain. Of the total severance and other restructuring costs recognized, $6.4 million, $10.0 million, and $0.9 million were included in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses, and research and development, respectively.