LINDSAY CORP (Form: 10-Q, Received: 03/28/2014 14:48:23)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2014

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 1-13419

Lindsay Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		47-0554096
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2222 N. 111th Street, Omaha, Nebraska		68164
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

402-829-6800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of March 25, 2014, 12,856,249 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

Lindsay Corporation

INDEX FORM 10-Q


			Page No.

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	ITEM 1 – *Financial Statements*

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013		3

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013		4

		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013		5

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013		6

		Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		7

	ITEM 2 – *Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition* *and Results of Operations*			14

	ITEM 3 – *Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk*			22

	ITEM 4 – *Controls and Procedures*			22

Part II – OTHER INFORMATION

	ITEM 1 – *Legal Proceedings*			23

	ITEM 1A – *Risk Factors*			23

	ITEM 2 – *Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds*			23

	ITEM 6 – *Exhibits*			24

SIGNATURES				25

- 2

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 – Financial Statements

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	February 28,			February 28,			February 28,			February 28,
($ and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)	2014			2013			2014			2013
Operating revenues	$	152,804		$	175,539		$	300,475		$	322,909
Cost of operating revenues		110,132			125,175			217,652			229,688

Gross profit		42,672			50,364			82,823			93,221

Operating expenses:
Selling expense		9,534			8,000			19,290			15,321
General and administrative expense		9,354			10,155			21,097			20,273
Engineering and research expense		2,871			2,763			5,531			5,917

Total operating expenses		21,759			20,918			45,918			41,511

Operating income		20,913			29,446			36,905			51,710
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(56	)		(83	)		(95	)		(226	)
Interest income		157			129			292			267
Other income (expense), net		(225	)		(4	)		(496	)		120

Earnings before income taxes		20,789			29,488			36,606			51,871
Income tax expense		7,339			10,137			12,922			17,792

Net earnings	$	13,450		$	19,351		$	23,684		$	34,079

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	1.04		$	1.51		$	1.84		$	2.66
Diluted	$	1.04		$	1.50		$	1.83		$	2.65
Shares used in computing earnings per share:
Basic		12,910			12,842			12,899			12,799
Diluted		12,942			12,882			12,947			12,867
Cash dividends declared per share	$	0.260		$	0.115		$	0.390		$	0.230

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 3

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	February 28,			February 28,			February 28,		February 28,
($ in thousands)	2014			2013			2014		2013
Net earnings	$	13,450		$	19,351		$	23,684	$	34,079

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Defined benefit pension plan adjustment, net of tax		28			33			56		66
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax		—			(35	)		—		(9	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of hedging activities and tax		(25	)		1,148			852		1,107

Total other comprehensive income, net of tax (benefit) expense of ($237), $275, ($595) and ($118)		3			1,146			908		1,164

Total comprehensive income	$	13,453		$	20,497		$	24,592	$	35,243

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 4

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)


	February 28,			February 28,			August 31,
($ and shares in thousands, except par values)	2014			2013			2013
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	165,509		$	159,583		$	151,927
Receivables, net of allowance of $3,520, $1,915 and $2,853		111,211			105,399			120,291
Inventories, net		80,994			78,071			68,607
Deferred income taxes		13,916			9,110			12,705
Other current assets		18,216			15,020			15,261

Total current assets		389,846			367,183			368,791

Property, Plant and Equipment:
Cost		158,948			141,973			153,422
Less accumulated depreciation		(93,502	)		(85,104	)		(88,358	)

Property, plant and equipment, net		65,446			56,869			65,064

Intangibles, net		34,084			23,729			36,007
Goodwill		37,282			30,211			37,414
Other noncurrent assets		3,961			4,490			5,020

Total assets	$	530,619		$	482,482		$	512,296

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	53,954		$	63,651		$	42,276
Current portion of long-term debt		—			2,143			—
Other current liabilities		54,204			45,724			59,816

Total current liabilities		108,158			111,518			102,092

Pension benefits liabilities		6,202			6,676			6,324
Deferred income taxes		13,975			9,716			15,415
Other noncurrent liabilities		7,590			7,415			7,827

Total liabilities		135,925			135,325			131,658

Shareholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock of $1 par value-
Authorized 2,000 shares; no shares issued		—			—			—
Common stock of $1 par value-
Authorized 25,000 shares; 18,633 issued		18,633			18,553			18,571
Capital in excess of stated value		50,794			47,036			49,764
Retained earnings		424,241			372,242			405,580
Less treasury stock (at cost, 5,777 shares)		(97,566	)		(90,961	)		(90,961	)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net		(1,408	)		287			(2,316	)

Total shareholders’ equity		394,694			347,157			380,638

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	530,619		$	482,482		$	512,296

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 5

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	Six months ended
	February 28,			February 28,
($ in thousands)	2014			2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net earnings	$	23,684		$	34,079
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		7,384			6,240
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable		618			530
Deferred income taxes		(2,696	)		(2,104	)
Share-based compensation expense		2,191			2,351
Other, net		250			144
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables		9,010			(22,880	)
Inventories		(12,192	)		(24,827	)
Other current assets		(2,400	)		(4,222	)
Accounts payable		11,422			32,066
Other current liabilities		(5,410	)		5,331
Current income taxes payable		(168	)		(789	)
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities		754			273

Net cash provided by operating activities		32,447			26,192

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(5,353	)		(5,342	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		35			14
Proceeds from settlement of net investment hedges		280			—
Payments for settlement of net investment hedges		(1,846	)		(1,919	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(6,884	)		(7,247	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		371			1,619
Common stock withheld for payroll tax withholdings		(2,027	)		(2,441	)
Principal payments on long-term debt		—			(2,142	)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		695			2,629
Repurchase of common shares		(6,605	)		—
Dividends paid		(5,023	)		(2,952	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(12,589	)		(3,287	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		608			481

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		13,582			16,139
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		151,927			143,444

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	165,509		$	159,583

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 6

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and do not include all of the disclosures normally required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) as contained in Lindsay Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of trends or results expected by the Company for a full year.

The condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared using U.S. GAAP. These principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior financial statements and notes to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications were not material to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Note 2 – New Accounting Pronouncements

Newly Adopted Accounting Standards

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-11, Amendments to Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities and in January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities . The objective of ASU No. 2011-11 and ASU No. 2013-01 is to provide enhanced disclosures that will enable users of an entity’s financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on its financial position. Derivative instruments accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements, securities borrowing, and securities lending transactions are subject to ASU No. 2011-11 disclosure requirements. ASU No. 2011-11 and ASU No. 2013-01 became effective for the Company beginning the first quarter of fiscal year 2014. The adoption of these standards did not have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The objective of ASU No. 2013-02 is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”). Entities are required to disclose changes in AOCI balances by component and significant items reclassified out of AOCI. ASU No. 2013-02 became effective for the Company beginning the first quarter of fiscal year 2014. The adoption of these standards did not have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Standards Issued but not yet adopted

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity . The objective of ASU No. 2013-05 is to clarify the applicable guidance for the release of the cumulative translation adjustment under U.S. GAAP. The effective date for ASU No. 2013-05 will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2015. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to impact its condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 7

Note 3 – Net Earnings per Share

The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted net earnings per share for the three and six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013:


	Three months ended				Six months ended
	February 28,		February 28,		February 28,		February 28,
($ and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)	2014		2013		2014		2013
Numerator:
Net earnings	$	13,450	$	19,351	$	23,684	$	34,079
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding		12,910		12,842		12,899		12,799
Diluted effect of stock equivalents		32		40		48		68

Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution		12,942		12,882		12,947		12,867

Basic net earnings per share	$	1.04	$	1.51	$	1.84	$	2.66
Diluted net earnings per share	$	1.04	$	1.50	$	1.83	$	2.65

Certain stock options and restricted stock units are excluded from the computation of diluted net earnings per share because their effect is anti-dilutive. Performance stock units are excluded from the calculation of dilutive potential common shares until the threshold performance conditions have been satisfied. Items excluded from the calculation were not significant for the three and six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013.

Note 4 – Income Taxes

It is the Company’s policy to report income tax expense for interim periods using an estimated annual effective income tax rate. However, the tax effects of significant or unusual items are not considered in the estimated annual effective income tax rate. The tax effects of such discrete events are recognized in the interim period in which the events occur. The Company recorded no material discrete items for the three and six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013.

The Company recorded income tax expense of $7.3 million and $12.9 million for the three and six months ended February 28, respectively. The Company recorded income tax expense of $10.1 million and $17.8 million for the three and six months ended February 28, 2013, respectively. The estimated annual effective income tax rate was 35.3 percent and 34.3 percent for the year-to-date periods ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in the estimated annual effective income tax rate from February 2013 to February 2014 primarily relates to incremental increases in taxes due to the earnings mix among jurisdictions.

Note 5 – Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following as of February 28, 2014, February 28, 2013 and August 31, 2013:


	February 28,			February 28,			August 31,
($ in thousands)	2014			2013			2013
Raw materials and supplies	$	19,614		$	19,102		$	19,369
Work in process		7,722			6,571			5,665
Finished goods and purchased parts		59,928			59,448			50,038

Total inventory value before LIFO adjustment		87,264			85,121			75,072
Less adjustment to LIFO value		(6,270	)		(7,050	)		(6,465	)

Inventories, net	$	80,994		$	78,071		$	68,607

- 8

Note 6 – Credit Arrangements

The Company has no outstanding long-term debt and was in compliance with all loan covenants as of February 28, 2014. The Company’s credit arrangements consisted of the following:

Revolving Credit Agreement

The Company has an unsecured $30.0 million Revolving Credit Note and Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which was amended on January 22, 2014 to revise letter of credit expiry dates and cash collateralization procedures (“the “Revolving Credit Agreement”). The borrowings from the Revolving Credit Agreement may primarily be used for working capital purposes and funding acquisitions. At February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, the Company had no outstanding borrowings on the Revolving Credit Agreement. The amount of borrowings available at any time under the Revolving Credit Agreement is reduced by the amount of standby letters of credit then outstanding. At February 28, 2014, the Company had the ability to borrow $24.5 million under this facility, after consideration of standby letters of credit of $5.5 million. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 90 basis points (1.06 percent as of February 28, 2014), subject to adjustment as set forth in the Revolving Credit Agreement. Interest is paid on a monthly to quarterly basis depending on loan type. The Company also pays an annual commitment fee of 0.25 percent on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Agreement. Any unpaid principal and interest is due by February 13, 2016.

The Revolving Credit Agreement contains certain covenants relating to the Company’s financial condition. These include maintaining a funded debt to EBITDA ratio, a fixed charge coverage ratio, a current ratio and a tangible net worth requirement at specified levels. Upon the occurrence of any event of default of these covenants, including a change in control of the Company, all amounts due thereunder may be declared to be immediately due and payable.

Euro Line of Credit

The Company’s wholly-owned European subsidiary, Lindsay Europe SAS, had an unsecured revolving line of credit with Societe Generale, a European commercial bank, under which it could borrow for working capital purposes up to 2.3 million Euros (the “Euro Line of Credit”). The Euro Line of Credit expired on January 31, 2014.

Note 7 – Financial Derivatives

The Company uses certain financial derivatives to mitigate its exposure to volatility in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company uses these derivative instruments to hedge exposures in the ordinary course of business and does not invest in derivative instruments for speculative purposes. The Company manages market and credit risks associated with its derivative instruments by establishing and monitoring limits as to the types and degree of risk that may be undertaken, and by entering into transactions with high-quality counterparties. As of February 28, 2014, the Company’s derivative counterparty had investment grade credit ratings. Financial derivatives consist of the following:


	Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
	Asset (Liability)
		February 28,			February 28,			August 31,
($ in thousands)	Balance Sheet Classification	2014			2013			2013
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other current assets	$	59		$	921		$	151
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other current liabilities		(172	)		(234	)		(258	)
Interest rate swap	Other current liabilities		—			(18	)		—

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		$	(113	)	$	669		$	(107	)

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other current assets	$	—		$	32		$	78
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other current liabilities		(106	)		(103	)		(33	)

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	(106	)	$	(71	)	$	45

Accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) included realized and unrealized after-tax gains of $1.1 million, $1.8 million and $2.0 million at February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, respectively, related to derivative contracts designated as hedging instruments.

- 9


	Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives
	Three months ended					Six months ended
	February 28,			February 28,		February 28,			February 28,
($ in thousands)	2014			2013		2014			2013
Foreign currency forward contracts, net of tax expense (benefit) of ($196), $169, ($599) and ($216)	$	(245	)	$	133	$	(940	)	$	(498	)

For the three months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, the Company settled foreign currency forward contracts resulting in an after-tax net loss of $0.4 million and $0.5 million, which were included in OCI as part of a currency translation adjustment. For the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, the Company settled foreign currency forward contracts resulting in an after-tax net loss of $0.9 million and $1.2 million, which were included in OCI as part of a currency translation adjustment.

There were no amounts recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of operations related to ineffectiveness of foreign currency forward contracts related to net investment hedges for the three and six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013. Accumulated currency translation adjustments from net investment hedges in AOCI at February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013 reflected realized and unrealized after-tax gains of $1.1 million, $1.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively.

At February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding Euro foreign currency forward contracts to sell 28.9 million Euro, 29.5 million Euro and 29.2 million Euro, respectively, at fixed prices to settle during the next fiscal quarter. At February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, the Company had an outstanding South African Rand foreign currency forward contract to sell 43.0 million South African Rand at fixed prices to settle during the next fiscal quarter. The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts qualify as hedges of a net investment in foreign operations.

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, respectively.


	February 28, 2014
($ in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
Cash and cash equivalents	$	165,509	$	—		$	—	$	165,509
Derivative assets		—		59			—		59
Derivative liabilities		—		(278	)		—		(278	)

	February 28, 2013
($ in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
Cash and cash equivalents	$	159,583	$	—		$	—	$	159,583
Derivative assets		—		953			—		953
Derivative liabilities		—		(355	)		—		(355	)

	August 31, 2013
($ in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
Cash and cash equivalents	$	151,927	$	—		$	—	$	151,927
Derivative assets		—		229			—		229
Derivative liabilities		—		(291	)		—		(291	)

The carrying amount of long-term debt (including current portion), which represented fair value, was zero, $2.1 million and zero as of February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, respectively. Fair value of long-term debt (including current portion) is estimated (using level 2 inputs) by discounting the future estimated cash flows of each instrument at current market interest rates for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities and credit quality.

The Company also measures the fair value of certain assets on a non-recurring basis, generally quarterly, annually, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. These assets include fixed assets, goodwill, and other intangible assets. There were no required fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the three and six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013.

- 10

Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies

In the ordinary course of its business operations, the Company is involved, from time to time, in commercial litigation, employment disputes, administrative proceedings and other legal proceedings. The Company has established accruals for certain proceedings based on an assessment of probability of loss. The Company believes that any potential loss in excess of the amounts accrued would not have a material effect on the business or its condensed consolidated financial statements. Such proceedings are exclusive of environmental remediation matters which are discussed separately below.

Environmental Remediation

In 1992, the Company entered into a consent decree with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) in which the Company committed to remediate environmental contamination of the groundwater that was discovered in 1982 through 1990 at and adjacent to its Lindsay, Nebraska facility (the “site”). The site was added to the EPA’s list of priority superfund sites in 1989. Between 1993 and 1995, remediation plans for the site were approved by the EPA and fully implemented by the Company. Since 1998, the primary remaining contamination at the site has been the presence of volatile organic chemicals in the soil and groundwater. To date, the remediation process has consisted primarily of drilling wells into the aquifer and pumping water to the surface to allow these contaminants to be removed by aeration.

In fiscal 2012, the Company undertook an investigation to assess further potential site remediation and containment actions. In connection with the receipt of preliminary results of this investigation and other evaluations, the Company estimated that it would incur $7.2 million in remediation of source area contamination and operating costs and accrued that undiscounted amount as an operating expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The EPA has not approved the Company’s remediation plan.

In addition to the source area noted above, the Company has determined that volatile organic chemicals also exist under one of the manufacturing buildings on the site. Due to the location, the Company has not yet determined the extent of these chemicals or whether they are contributing, if at all, to groundwater contamination. Due to the current stage of discussions with the EPA and the uncertainty of the remediation actions that may be required with respect to this affected area, the Company believes that meaningful estimates of costs or range of costs cannot currently be made and accordingly have not been accrued.

In fiscal 2013, the Company and the EPA conducted a periodic five-year review of the status of the remediation of the contamination site. This review resulted in no findings that affected the Company’s environmental liability accrual. The EPA has agreed with the Company’s plan to complete investigation of the soil and groundwater on the site, including the area under the building, during fiscal 2014 and early 2015. The Company expects that once this additional testing is complete, it will come to an agreement with the EPA on how to proceed. During the first six months of fiscal 2014, the Company did not accrue any additional incremental costs related to environmental remediation liabilities.

The Company accrues the anticipated cost of investigation and remediation when the obligation is probable and can be reasonably estimated. Although the Company has accrued all reasonably estimable costs associated with the site, it anticipates there could be revisions to the current remediation plan as well as additional testing and environmental monitoring as part of the Company’s ongoing discussions with the EPA regarding the development and implementation of the remedial action plans. Any revisions could be material to the operating results of any fiscal quarter or fiscal year. The Company does not expect such additional expenses would have a material adverse effect on its liquidity or financial condition.

The following table summarizes the undiscounted environmental remediation liability classifications included in the balance sheet as of February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013:


Environmental Remediation Liabilities
($ in thousands)	February 28,		February 28,		August 31,
Balance Sheet Classification	2014		2013		2013
Other current liabilities	$	1,346	$	2,244	$	1,740
Other noncurrent liabilities		5,200		5,200		5,200

Total environmental remediation liabilities	$	6,546	$	7,444	$	6,940

- 11

Note 10 – Warranties

The following table provides the changes in the Company’s product warranties:


	Three months ended
	February 28,			February 28,
($ in thousands)	2014			2013
Product warranty accrual balance, beginning of period	$	8,622		$	5,052
Liabilities accrued for warranties during the period		703			1,234
Warranty claims paid during the period		(908	)		(714	)

Product warranty accrual balance, end of period	$	8,417		$	5,572


	Six months ended
($ in thousands)	February 28, 2014			February 28, 2013
Product warranty accrual balance, beginning of period	$	6,695		$	4,848
Liabilities accrued for warranties during the period		3,745			2,526
Warranty claims paid during the period		(2,023	)		(1,802	)

Product warranty accrual balance, end of period	$	8,417		$	5,572

Note 11 – Share-Based Compensation

The Company’s current share-based compensation plans, approved by the stockholders of the Company, provides for awards of stock options, restricted shares, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), stock appreciation rights, performance shares and performance stock units (“PSUs”) to employees and non-employee directors of the Company. The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values. Share-based compensation expense was $1.0 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Share-based compensation expense was $2.2 million and $2.4 million for the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company awarded its annual grant of RSUs to independent members of the Board of Directors at a grant date fair value of $83.17 per share, which resulted in a total of 5,831 RSUs being granted. These RSUs are scheduled to become fully vested on November 1, 2014 and were issued from the Company’s 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Note 12 – Industry Segment Information

Irrigation— This reporting segment includes the manufacture and marketing of center pivot, lateral move, and hose reel irrigation systems as well as various water pumping stations, controls, and filtration solutions. The irrigation reporting segment consists of thirteen operating segments that have similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria, including similar products, production processes, type or class of customer and methods for distribution.

Infrastructure— This reporting segment includes the manufacture and marketing of Road Zipper Systems ^TM , moveable barriers, specialty barriers and crash cushions; providing outsource manufacturing services and the manufacturing and selling of large diameter steel tubing and railroad signals and structures. The infrastructure reporting segment consists of two operating segments that have similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria, including similar products, production processes, type or class of customer and methods for distribution.

The Company evaluates the performance of its reportable segments based on segment sales, gross profit, and operating income, with operating income for segment purposes excluding unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses, interest income, interest expense, other income and expenses, and income taxes. Operating income for segment purposes does include general and administrative expenses, selling expenses, engineering and research expenses, environmental remediation expenses and other overhead charges directly attributable to the segment.

The Company had no single major customer who represented 10 percent or more of its total revenues during the three and six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013.

- 12

Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in the following tables:


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	February 28,			February 28,			February 28,			February 28,
($ in thousands)	2014			2013			2014			2013
Operating revenues:
Irrigation	$	135,884		$	162,677		$	265,067		$	296,894
Infrastructure		16,920			12,862			35,408			26,015

Total operating revenues	$	152,804		$	175,539		$	300,475		$	322,909

Operating income (loss):
Irrigation	$	24,548		$	35,267		$	44,859		$	62,735
Infrastructure		6			(2,066	)		514			(3,384	)

Segment operating income		24,554			33,201			45,373			59,351
Unallocated general and administrative expenses		(3,641	)		(3,755	)		(8,468	)		(7,641	)
Interest and other income (expense), net		(124	)		42			(299	)		161

Earnings before income taxes	$	20,789		$	29,488		$	36,606		$	51,871

Capital Expenditures:
Irrigation	$	2,709		$	2,965		$	4,937		$	5,051
Infrastructure		257			162			416			291

	$	2,966		$	3,127		$	5,353		$	5,342

Depreciation and Amortization:
Irrigation	$	2,341		$	1,692		$	4,699		$	3,396
Infrastructure		1,336			1,418			2,685			2,844

	$	3,677		$	3,110		$	7,384		$	6,240


($ in thousands)	February 28, 2014		February 28, 2013		August 31, 2013
Total Assets:
Irrigation	$	404,828	$	371,755	$	391,527
Infrastructure		125,791		110,727		120,769

	$	530,619	$	482,482	$	512,296

Note 13 – Other Current Liabilities


	February 28,		February 28,		August 31,
($ in thousands)	2014		2013		2013
Other current liabilities:
Compensation and benefits	$	13,299	$	13,790	$	18,471
Warranties		8,417		5,572		6,695
Dealer liabilities		6,749		4,313		7,134
Deferred revenues		6,525		2,540		4,790
Customer deposits		5,611		6,248		4,580
Other		13,603		13,261		18,146

Total other current liabilities	$	54,204	$	45,724	$	59,816

Note 14 – Share Repurchases

On January 3, 2014, the Company announced that its Board of Directors replaced its existing share repurchase authorization with an increased authorization to repurchase up to $150.0 million of common stock with an authorization effective through January 2, 2016. During the three and six months ended February 28, 2014, the Company repurchased 78,520 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $6.6 million. During the three and six months ended February 28, 2013, the Company did not repurchase shares of common stock. The remaining amount available under the repurchase program was $143.4 million as of February 28, 2014.

- 13

ITEM 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains not only historical information, but also forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Statements that are not historical are forward-looking and reflect expectations for future Company conditions or performance. In addition, forward-looking statements may be made orally or in press releases, conferences, reports, on the Company’s worldwide web site, or otherwise, in the future by or on behalf of the Company. When used by or on behalf of the Company, the words “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” “will,” “plan,” “project,” and similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements. The entire section entitled “Market Conditions and Outlook” should be considered forward-looking statements. For these statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2013. Readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should recognize that the statements are predictions of future results or conditions, which may not occur as anticipated. Actual results or conditions could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described herein and in the Company’s other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2013, as well as other risks and uncertainties not now anticipated. The risks and uncertainties described herein and in the Company’s other public filings are not exclusive and further information concerning the Company and its businesses, including factors that potentially could materially affect the Company’s financial results, may emerge from time to time. Except as required by law, the Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements.

Accounting Policies

In preparing the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, management must make a variety of decisions which impact the reported amounts and the related disclosures. These decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. In making these decisions, management applies its judgment based on its understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances and the Company’s historical experience.

The Company’s accounting policies that are most important to the presentation of its results of operations and financial condition, and which require the greatest use of judgments and estimates by management, are designated as its critical accounting policies. See discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies under Item 7 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2013. Management periodically re-evaluates and adjusts its critical accounting policies as circumstances change. There were no changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies during the three and six months ended February 28, 2014.

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 – New Accounting Pronouncements to the condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

- 14

Executive Overview

Net earnings for the three months ended February 28, 2014 were $13.5 million or $1.04 per diluted share compared with $19.4 million or $1.50 per diluted share in the prior year. The decrease in earnings was primarily attributable to a 13 percent decline in operating revenues to $152.8 million from $175.5 million in the prior year period. Gross margin declined to 27.9 percent of sales from 28.7 percent in the prior year due to a shift in sales mix and deleverage of fixed costs on lower sales. In addition, operating expenses increased by $0.8 million, including an incremental $2.2 million of expenses associated with the newly acquired LAKOS ^® business. Excluding the LAKOS ^® acquisition, operating expenses declined $1.4 million.

The primary driver to consolidated results in the quarter was the irrigation segment, where sales decreased by 16 percent to $135.9 million from $162.7 million in the prior year and operating margins declined to 18.1 percent of sales from 21.7 percent last year. The lower sales were primarily attributable to a $23.4 million sales decline in U.S. irrigation markets as a result of lower crop prices and a decreasing impact of drought conditions in the U.S. Corn Belt, while the lower operating margins are due to the deleveraging of fixed expenses on lower revenue.

Infrastructure segment results improved in the quarter as revenues increased 32 percent to $16.9 million and operating profit improved to break-even as compared to an operating loss of $2.1 million in the prior year. Sales and profit improvements are due to a more aggressive approach to sales growth in the infrastructure product lines while improving gross margins and reducing SG&A expenses.

During the second quarter, the Company began to execute the capital allocation plan that it had announced in January 2014, doubling its quarterly cash dividend to $0.26 per common share and repurchasing 78,520 shares of common stock for $6.6 million.

Market Conditions and Outlook

The Company’s irrigation revenues are highly dependent upon the need for irrigated agricultural crop production, which, in turn, depends upon many factors, including the primary drivers of agricultural commodity prices, net farm income, weather conditions and governmental policies regarding the agricultural sector. The degree to which each of these factors impact the irrigation equipment purchase decisions of the Company’s customers is difficult to predict.

Farm commodity prices have declined during the past year on indications of strong yields and a decreasing impact of drought conditions in the U.S. Corn Belt. As of February 2014, corn prices have decreased 35 percent and soybeans have decreased 3 percent compared to the same time last year. As of February 2014, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) estimated U.S. 2014 net farm income to be $95.8 billion, down 27 percent from USDA’s estimate of U.S. 2013 net farm income of $130.5 billion. The U.S. 2014 net farm income forecast would be the lowest since 2010, but would remain 9% above the 10-year average.

A number of recent and potential regulatory actions could further impact the Company’s business.

•

The Agricultural Act of 2014 was signed into law and extends for five years. This law continues many of its existing programs, including funding for the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), which provides financial assistance to farmers to implement conservation practices and is frequently used to assist in the purchase of center pivot irrigation systems.

•

Certain tax incentives (such as the Section 179 income tax deduction and bonus depreciation) that encourage equipment purchases were significantly reduced for 2014.

•

The ethanol mandate that increases corn demand was reduced.

•

The U.S. government has imposed trade sanctions that could impact irrigation equipment purchases in Russia and Ukraine.

At this point, the Company anticipates lower irrigation segment revenues for the remainder of fiscal 2014 primarily due to the significant decrease in agricultural commodity prices. The U.S. irrigation market has slowed significantly as compared to the past several years of record crop prices and the significant drought. The potential for an increase in international irrigation revenues will be challenging for the remainder of fiscal 2014 since prior year irrigation revenues included $33.4 million from the equipment purchases in Iraq. The current political environment regarding Russia and Ukraine may further limit international irrigation equipment growth.

- 15

While the Company anticipates a decline from peak irrigation revenues during the near-term, drivers for the Company’s markets of population growth, expanded food production and efficient water use, support the Company’s expectation for long-term growth. The Company believes the most significant opportunities for growth over the next several years are in international markets, where irrigation use is significantly less developed and demand is driven primarily by food security, water scarcity and population growth. The Company’s capital expenditure plan includes investments in a manufacturing operation in Turkey, which is planned to be operational early in fiscal 2015 and should accommodate long-term growth plans for several international markets.

Infrastructure demand has increased in recent quarters as the Company has aggressively pursued market expansion. However, the infrastructure business remains dependent on government spending on highway and other infrastructure projects. In addition, the current U.S. highway bill is scheduled to expire in the fall of 2014. While the infrastructure segment continues to experience revenue and profit volatility due to the project nature of the Road Zipper Systems ^TM and the fixed nature of some operating expenses, the Company believes it has sizeable market penetration opportunities for road safety products and Road Zipper Systems ^TM worldwide. Demand for the Company’s transportation safety products continues to be driven by population growth and the need for improved road safety.

As of February 28, 2014, the Company had an order backlog of $89.3 million compared with $159.3 million at February 28, 2013 and $66.5 million at August 31, 2013. Order backlog at February 28, 2014 declined from the same time in 2013 in U.S. and international irrigation markets, and infrastructure segment backlog increased over the same time last year. The current year infrastructure backlog includes a $12.8 million Road Zipper System ^TM order for the Golden Gate Bridge which will be recognized in revenue in fiscal 2015. The prior year irrigation backlog included a $39.1 million equipment and installation contract in Iraq, of which $3.0 million remained in backlog at February 28, 2014. The Company’s backlog can fluctuate from period to period due to the seasonality, cyclicality, timing and execution of contracts. Typically, the Company’s backlog at any point in time represents only a portion of the revenue it expects to realize during the following three-month period. However, the timing related to certain project oriented contracts may extend longer than three months.

For the business overall, the global, long-term drivers of water conservation, population growth, increasing importance of biofuels, and the need for safer, more efficient transportation solutions remain positive. The Company is committed to increasing shareholder value through investments in organic growth, dividend increases, synergistic water related acquisitions, and share repurchases, as outlined in the Company’s capital allocation plan announced in January 2014.

- 16

Results of Operations

For the Three Months ended February 28, 2014 compared to the Three Months ended February 28, 2013

The following section presents an analysis of the Company’s operating results displayed in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013. It should be read together with the industry segment information in Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements:


	Three months ended						Percent
	February 28,			February 28,			Increase
($ in thousands)	2014			2013			(Decrease)
Consolidated
Operating revenues	$	152,804		$	175,539			(13	%)
Gross profit	$	42,672		$	50,364			(15	%)
Gross margin		27.9	%		28.7	%
Operating expenses ⁽¹⁾	$	21,759		$	20,918			4	%
Operating income	$	20,913		$	29,446			(29	%)
Operating margin		13.7	%		16.8	%
Other (expense) income, net	$	(124	)	$	42			(395	%)
Income tax expense	$	7,339		$	10,137			(28	%)
Effective income tax rate		35.3	%		34.4	%
Net earnings	$	13,450		$	19,351			(30	%)
Irrigation Equipment Segment
Segment operating revenues	$	135,884		$	162,677			(16	%)
Segment operating income ⁽²⁾	$	24,548		$	35,267			(30	%)
Segment operating margin ⁽²⁾		18.1	%		21.7	%
Infrastructure Products Segment
Segment operating revenues	$	16,920		$	12,862			32	%
Segment operating income (loss) ⁽²⁾	$	6		$	(2,066	)		100	%
Segment operating margin ⁽²⁾		0.0	%		(16.1	%)

(1)	Includes $3.6 million and $3.8 million of unallocated general and administrative expenses for the three months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

(2)	Excludes unallocated general and administrative expenses.

- 17

Revenues

Operating revenues for the three months ended February 28, 2014 declined 13 percent to $152.8 million from $175.5 million for the three months ended February 28, 2013 as irrigation revenues decreased $26.8 million partially offset by the $4.1 million increase of infrastructure revenues. The irrigation segment provided 89 percent of the Company’s revenue for the three months ended February 28, 2014 as compared to 93 percent of the same prior year period.

U.S. irrigation revenues for the three months ended February 28, 2014 of $92.8 million decreased 21 percent compared to the three months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease in U.S. irrigation revenues is primarily due to a 35 percent decrease in the number of irrigation systems sold and a 10 percent decrease in irrigation parts volume compared to the second fiscal quarter of the prior year, with the largest decreases in the Corn Belt where the drought conditions in 2012 led to high demand in fiscal 2013. Lower commodity prices, with corn decreasing 35 percent and soybeans decreasing 3 percent over the same period last year, contributed to lower demand for U.S. irrigation equipment. The revenues generated from the newly acquired LAKOS ^® business in August 2013 partially offset the volume decreases in irrigation systems and parts.

International irrigation revenues for the three months ended February 28, 2014 of $43.1 million decreased 5 percent from $45.5 million in the three months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease in international irrigation revenues is primarily due to volume decreases in the number of irrigation systems sold compared to the prior year. Operating revenues decreased most significantly in the Middle East and Russia/Ukraine partially offset by increases in Australia, Africa, and water filtration system sales from the newly acquired LAKOS ^® business.

Infrastructure segment revenues were $16.9 million for the three months ended February 28, 2014 increasing 32 percent from $12.9 million for the three months ended February 28, 2013 primarily due to sales increases across all product lines and most significantly in road safety products and railroad signals and structures.

Gross Margin

Gross profit for the three months ended February 28, 2014 of $42.7 million decreased from $50.4 million for three months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease in gross profit was primarily due to the decline in sales and a decrease in gross margin to 27.9 percent for the three months ended February 28, 2014 from 28.7 percent for the three months ended February 28, 2013. Gross margins in irrigation declined by approximately one percentage point due to fixed cost deleverage on lower sales and a higher percentage of sales being made in international markets that typically have lower margins than U.S. sales. Infrastructure gross margins improved by approximately seven percentage points primarily due to a combination of mix shift to higher margin products and fixed cost leverage on higher sales volume.

Operating Expenses

The Company’s operating expenses of $21.8 million for the three months ended February 28, 2014 increased by $0.8 million over operating expenses incurred during the three months ended February 28, 2013. The newly acquired LAKOS ^® business in August 2013 increased operating expenses by $2.2 million. Excluding the LAKOS ^® acquisition, operating expenses declined $1.4 million primarily due to reductions of $0.9 million in incentive compensation and $0.5 million in advertising expenses. Operating expenses were 14.2 percent of sales for the three months ended February 28, 2014 compared to 11.9 percent of sales for the three months ended February 28, 2013.

The combination of lower gross margins and higher operating expenses resulted in a reduction in operating margin for the three months ended February 28, 2014 to 13.7 percent as compared to 16.8 percent for the three months ended February 28, 2013.

Income Taxes

The Company recorded income tax expense of $7.3 million and $10.1 million for the three months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The estimated annual effective income tax rate was 35.3 percent and 34.4 percent for the three months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in the estimated annual effective income tax rate primarily relates to an incremental increase in taxes due to the earnings mix among jurisdictions.

- 18

For the Six Months ended February 28, 2014 compared to the Six Months ended February 28, 2013

The following section presents an analysis of the Company’s operating results displayed in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013. It should be read together with the industry segment information in Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements:


	Six months ended						Percent
	February 28,			February 28,			Increase
$ in thousands	2014			2013			(Decrease)
Consolidated
Operating revenues	$	300,475		$	322,909			(7	%)
Gross profit	$	82,823		$	93,221			(11	%)
Gross margin		27.6	%		28.9	%
Operating expenses ⁽¹⁾	$	45,918		$	41,511			11	%
Operating income	$	36,905		$	51,710			(29	%)
Operating margin		12.3	%		16.0	%
Other (expense) income, net	$	(299	)	$	161			(286	%)
Income tax expense	$	12,922		$	17,792			(27	%)
Effective income tax rate		35.3	%		34.3	%
Net earnings	$	23,684		$	34,079			(31	%)
Irrigation Equipment Segment
Segment operating revenues	$	265,067		$	296,894			(11	%)
Segment operating income ⁽²⁾	$	44,859		$	62,735			(28	%)
Segment operating margin ⁽²⁾		16.9	%		21.1	%
Infrastructure Products Segment
Segment operating revenues	$	35,408		$	26,015			36	%
Segment operating income (loss) ⁽²⁾	$	514		$	(3,384	)		115	%
Segment operating margin ⁽²⁾		1.5	%		(13.0	%)

(1)	Includes $8.5 million and $7.6 million of unallocated general and administrative expenses for the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

(2)	Excludes unallocated general and administrative expenses.

- 19

Revenues

Operating revenues for the six months ended February 28, 2014 decreased 7 percent to $300.5 million from $322.9 million for the six months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease is attributable to a $31.8 million decrease in irrigation revenues offset in part by a $9.4 million increase in infrastructure revenues. The irrigation segment provided 88 percent of Company revenue for the six months ended February 28, 2014 as compared to 92 percent of the same prior year period.

U.S. irrigation revenues for the six months ended February 28, 2014 of $172.6 million decreased 19 percent compared to the six months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease in U.S. irrigation revenues is primarily due to a 33 percent decrease in the number of irrigation systems sold and an 11 percent decrease in irrigation parts volume compared to the first half of the prior year, with the largest decreases in the Corn Belt where the drought conditions in 2012 led to high demand in fiscal 2013. Lower agricultural commodity prices contributed to lower demand for U.S. irrigation equipment. The revenues generated from the newly acquired LAKOS ^® business in August 2013 partially offset the volume decreases in irrigation systems and parts.

International irrigation revenues for the six months ended February 28, 2014 of $92.4 million increased 11 percent from $83.3 million in the six months ended February 28, 2013. The increase in international irrigation revenues is primarily due to volume increases in the number of irrigation systems sold and water filtration system sales from the newly acquired LAKOS ^® business. Operating revenues increased most significantly in Australia and South America partially offset by decreases in the Middle East.

Infrastructure segment revenues were $35.4 million for the six months ended February 28, 2014 increasing 36 percent from $26.0 million for the six months ended February 28, 2013 primarily due to sales increases in nearly all product lines and most significantly in road safety products and railroad signals and structures.

Gross Margin

Gross profit for the six months ended February 28, 2014 of $82.8 million decreased from $93.2 million for the six months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease in gross profit was primarily due to the decline in sales and a decrease in gross margin to 27.6 percent for the six months ended February 28, 2014 compared from 28.9 percent for the six months ended February 28, 2013. Gross margins in irrigation declined by approximately two percentage points due to a $2.3 million charge related to a product warranty matter, fixed cost deleverage on lower volume, and a higher percentage of irrigation sales being made in international markets that typically have lower margins than U.S. sales. Infrastructure gross margins improved by approximately six percentage points primarily due to a combination of mix shift to higher margin products and fixed cost leverage on higher sales volume.

Operating Expenses

The Company’s operating expenses of $45.9 million for the six months ended February 28, 2014 increased by $4.4 million over operating expenses incurred during the six months ended February 28, 2013. The newly acquired LAKOS ^® business in August 2013 increased operating expenses by $4.3 million. Operating expenses were 15.3 percent of sales for the six months ended February 28, 2014 compared to 12.9 percent of sales for the six months ended February 28, 2013.

The combination of lower gross margins and higher operating expenses resulted in a reduction in operating margin for the six months ended February 28, 2014 to 12.3 percent as compared to 16.0 percent for the six months ended February 28, 2013.

Income Taxes

The Company recorded income tax expense of $12.9 million and $17.8 million for the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The estimated annual effective income tax rate was 35.3 percent and 34.3 percent for the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in the estimated annual effective income tax rate from February 2013 to February 2014 primarily relates to an incremental increase in taxes due to the earnings mix among jurisdictions.

- 20

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $165.5 million at February 28, 2014 compared with $159.6 million at February 28, 2013 and $151.9 million at August 31, 2013. The Company requires cash for financing its receivables and inventories, paying operating expenses and capital expenditures, and for dividends and share repurchases. The Company meets its liquidity needs and finances its capital expenditures from its available cash and funds provided by operations along with borrowings under its revolving credit arrangement described below. The Company believes its current cash resources, projected operating cash flow, and remaining capacity under its continuing bank lines of credit are sufficient to cover all of its expected working capital needs, planned capital expenditures, dividends, and other cash requirements, excluding potential acquisitions.

The Company’s total cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries was approximately $28.6 million and $13.4 million as of February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company does not intend to repatriate the funds, and does not expect these funds to have a significant impact on the Company’s overall liquidity. The Company considers its earnings in foreign subsidiaries to be permanently reinvested and would need to accrue and pay taxes if these funds were repatriated.

Net working capital was $281.7 million at February 28, 2014, as compared with $255.7 million at February 28, 2013. The increase in net working capital primarily resulted from increased cash generated by earnings and receivables driven by the timing of collections on large international sales projects.

Cash flows provided by operations totaled $32.4 million during the six months ended February 28, 2014 compared to $26.2 million provided by operations during the same prior year period. Cash provided by operations decreased by $6.3 million compared to the prior year period primarily as a result of decreased earnings ($10.4 million) and negative cash flow changes in payables ($20.6 million) offset in part by increases due to positive cash flow changes in receivables ($31.9 million) and inventories ($12.6 million).

Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $6.9 million during the six months ended February 28, 2014 compared to $7.2 million used in investing activities during the same prior year period. Capital spending of $5.4 million in fiscal 2014 increased compared to the prior year capital spending of $5.3 million. The capital spending increase was offset by $0.4 million increase from net settlements of net investment hedges.

Cash flows used in financing activities totaled $12.6 million during the six months ended February 28, 2014 compared to cash flows used in financing activities of $3.3 million during the same prior year period. The increase in cash used in financing activities was primarily related to share repurchases of $6.6 million and dividend increases of $2.1 million. The Company’s total interest-bearing debt decreased from $2.3 million at February 28, 2013 to none at February 28, 2014.

Capital Allocation Plan

The Company’s capital allocation plan articulates the Company’s plans to continue to invest in attaining revenue and earnings growth, combined with a defined process for enhancing returns to shareholders. Under the Company’s announced capital allocation plan in January 2014, the priorities for uses of cash include:

•

Investment in organic growth including capital expenditures and expansion of international markets,

•

Annual increases in dividends to shareholders,

•

Synergistic water related acquisitions that provide attractive returns to shareholders, and

•

Opportunistic share repurchases taking into account cyclical and seasonal fluctuations.

Capital Expenditures and Expansion of International Markets

Capital expenditures for fiscal 2014 are estimated to be approximately $15.0 million to $20.0 million largely focused on manufacturing capacity expansion and productivity improvements. The Company’s capital expenditure plan includes investments in a manufacturing operation in Turkey, which is planned to be operational early in fiscal 2015 and should accommodate long-term growth plans for several international markets. The Company’s management does maintain flexibility to modify the amount and timing of some of the planned expenditures in response to economic conditions.

Dividends

In the second quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company doubled its quarterly cash dividend to $0.26 per common share. The Company expects to continue paying quarterly dividends and provide annual dividend increases to shareholders, subject to declaration by the Board of Directors.

- 21

Share Repurchases

On January 3, 2014, the Company announced that its Board of Directors terminated its existing share repurchase authorization to purchase up to a maximum of 881,139 shares of its common stock, effective as of January 2, 2014, and replaced it with an increased authorization to repurchase up to $150.0 million of common stock through January 2, 2016. During the three and six months ended February 28, 2014, the Company repurchased 78,520 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $6.6 million. During the three and six months ended February 28, 2013, the Company did not repurchase shares of common stock. The remaining amount available under the repurchase program was $143.4 million as of February 28, 2014.

Credit Arrangements

The Company’s wholly-owned European subsidiary, Lindsay Europe SAS, had an unsecured revolving line of credit with Societe Generale, a European commercial bank, under which it could borrow for working capital purposes up to 2.3 million Euros. This line of credit expired on January 31, 2014. The Company intends to put a new credit arrangement in place during the second half of fiscal 2014.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

There have been no material changes in the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments as described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

ITEM 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There have been no material changes from the Company’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk previously disclosed in the Company’s most recent Annual Report filed on Form 10-K. See discussion of the Company’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk under Part II, Item 7A in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

ITEM 4 – Controls and Procedures

The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of February 28, 2014.

Additionally, the CEO and CFO determined that there has not been any change to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

- 22

Part II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 – Legal Proceedings

See the disclosure in Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies to the condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which disclosure is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 1A – Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. See the discussion of the Company’s risk factors under Part I, Item 1A in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

ITEM 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The table below sets forth information with respect to purchases of the Company’s common stock made by or on behalf of the Company during the three months ended February 28, 2014:

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number or Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs ⁽¹⁾ ($ in thousands)
December 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013		—	$	—		—		881,139 Shares
January 1, 2014 to January 31, 2014		66,027	$	84.03		66,027	$	144,452
February 1, 2014 to February 28, 2014		12,493	$	84.60		12,493	$	143,395

Total		78,520	$	84.12		78,520	$	143,395

⁽¹⁾

On January 3, 2014, the Company announced that its Board of Directors terminated its existing share repurchase authorization to purchase up to a maximum of 881,139 shares of its common stock, effective as of January 2, 2014, and replaced it with an increased authorization to repurchase up to $150.0 million of common stock through January 2, 2016. Under the new program, shares may be repurchased in privately negotiated and/or open market transactions in accordance with the terms of applicable federal and state securities laws and regulations including, without limitation, Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The total of $143.4 million represents the remaining amount available under the repurchase program as of February 28, 2014.

- 23

ITEM 6 – Exhibits


Exhibit No.		Description

3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 14, 2006.

3.2		Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2011.

4.1		Specimen Form of Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2006.

10.1*		Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated January 22, 2014, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.

10.2*		Lindsay Corporation Management Incentive Umbrella Plan, approved by the stockholders on January 27, 2014.

31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

101*		Interactive Data Files.

*	Filed herein.

- 24

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on this 28 ^th day of March 2014.


		LINDSAY CORPORATION

		By:		/s/ JAMES C. RAABE
		Name:		James C. Raabe
		Title:		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
				(on behalf of the registrant and as principal financial officer)

- 25

Exhibit 10.1

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT

THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this “ Amendment ”) is entered into as of January 22, 2014, by and between LINDSAY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (“ Borrower ”), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (“ Bank ”).

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Borrower is currently indebted to Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Revolving Credit Agreement between Borrower and Bank dated as of January 24, 2008 (the “ Original Credit Agreement ”). The Original Credit Agreement has been amended by the following:

(a)

First Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement dated January 23, 2010;

(b)

Second Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement dated January 23, 2011; and

(c)

Third Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement dated February 13, 2013.

Said Original Credit Agreement, as so amended, and as the same may be amended from time to time, is sometimes referred to herein as the “ Credit Agreement .”

WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower have agreed to certain changes in the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement and have agreed to amend the Credit Agreement to reflect said changes.

NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Credit Agreement shall be amended as follows:

1. Section 2.03(B) is hereby amended and restated as follows:

(B)

Letter of Credit Request and Cash Collateralization Procedure .

(1) Borrower shall give Bank irrevocable prior written notice (effective upon receipt) on or before 2:00 P.M. (Omaha, Nebraska time) on the Business Day which is not less than three (3) Business Days prior to the date of the requested issuance of a Letter of Credit specifying the requested amount, expiry date and issuance date of each Letter of Credit to be issued and the nature of the transactions to be supported thereby. Any such notice received after 2:00 P.M. (Omaha, Nebraska time) on a Business Day shall be deemed to have been received and be effective on the next Business Day. Each Letter of Credit shall have an expiration date that occurs on or before the Termination Date (except for the Letter of Credit that may be issued pursuant to Section 2.03(B)(2)); shall be payable in U.S. dollars, must be satisfactory in form and substance to Bank, and shall be issued pursuant to, and otherwise governed by, such documentation as Bank may reasonably require, including, without limitation, Bank’s standard letter of credit application and agreement forms.

-1-

(2) Notwithstanding Section 2.03(B)(1), Borrower may utilize the Commitment (and Letter of Credit Sublimit) in part by requesting that Bank issue, and Bank, subject to the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement, may, in its sole discretion issue a standby Letter of Credit with an expiry date of no later than December 31, 2025 (the “ Extended Letter of Credit ”); provided, however, that if the Extended Letter of Credit remains outstanding on a date (the “ Cash Collateral Funding Date ”) which is either (a) five (5) Business Days prior to the Termination Date (as the same may be extended from time to time), or (b) the date on which Borrower notifies Bank that the Credit Agreement is to be terminated or the line of credit represented by the Commitment is no longer to be maintained with Bank, Borrower shall, on the Cash Collateral Funding Date, deposit cash collateral in a special collateral account to be established and maintained with Bank (the “ Letter of Credit Collateral Account ”) in an amount equal to 105% of the then applicable stated amount of the Extended Letter of Credit. If Borrower fails to establish the Letter of Credit Collateral Account and fund the Letter of Credit Collateral Account on the Cash Collateral Funding Date, Borrower authorizes Bank to establish and fund the Letter of Credit Collateral Account by advancing a Loan in the required amount under Section 2.01. Borrower shall maintain the Letter of Credit Collateral Account in the name of Borrower but under the sole dominion and control of Bank, for the benefit of Bank and in which Borrower shall have no interest other than as set forth in this Section 2.03(B)(2). Borrower hereby pledges, assigns and grants to Bank, on behalf of and for the benefit of Bank, a security interest in all of Borrower’s right, title and interest in and to the Letter of Credit Collateral Account and all funds which may be on deposit in the Letter of Credit Collateral Account to secure the prompt and complete payment and performance of the obligations of the Borrower relating to the Extended Letter of Credit (including, without limitation, all Reimbursement Obligations and other obligations relating to such Letter of Credit under this Agreement or any related agreements, all of which shall survive the Termination Date (hereinafter the “ Extended Letter of Credit Obligations ”). Funds on deposit in the Letter of Credit Collateral Account shall be released to the Borrower within thirty (30) days after the Borrower provides evidence to the Bank that all of the Extended Letter of Credit Obligations have been satisfied and the Extended Letter of Credit is no longer outstanding.

2. This Amendment shall become effective when and only when the Bank shall have received all of the following, in each case in form and substance acceptable to the Bank: (a) counterparts of this Amendment duly executed by Borrower, and (b) such other documents or actions as the Bank may reasonably request.

3. Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement remain in full force and effect, without waiver or modification. All terms defined in the Credit Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the same meaning when used in this Amendment. This Amendment and the Credit Agreement shall be read together, as one document.

4. Borrower represents and warrants as follows:

(a) Borrower is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation shown above.

-2-

(b) The execution, delivery and performance by Borrower of this Amendment, the Credit Agreement, and the other Loan Documents, as amended hereby, are within Borrower’s powers, have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Borrower and its shareholders and/or directors, as applicable, and do not: (i) contravene Borrower’s articles of incorporation or bylaws, or (ii) contravene any law or any contractual restriction binding on or affecting Borrower or its consolidated subsidiaries, or (iii) result in, or require, the creation of any lien, security interest or other charge or encumbrance upon or with respect to any of the properties of the Borrower or any of its consolidated subsidiaries (other than liens, security interests, charges or encumbrances in favor of the Bank under the Credit Agreement and other Loan Documents).

(c) No authorization, approval or other action by, and no notice to or filing with, any governmental authority or regulatory body is required for the due execution, delivery and performance by Borrower of this Amendment or the Original Credit Agreement, as amended hereby, or other Loan Documents.

(d) This Amendment and the Original Credit Agreement, as amended hereby, and the other Loan Documents, constitute, legal, valid and binding obligations of Borrower enforceable against Borrower in accordance with their respective terms.

(e) There is no pending or threatened action or proceeding affecting Borrower before any court, governmental agency or arbitrator, which may materially adversely affect the authority of the Borrower to execute this Amendment or the financial condition or operations of Borrower or its ability to perform its obligations under the Original Credit Agreement, as amended hereby, and the other Loan Documents.

(f) Except to the extent otherwise provided in the Borrower’s Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2013, and more recently filed Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2013, and any subsequent period (together, the “ Most Recent Filing ”), Borrower restates and affirms each and all of the representations of Borrower set forth in Article IV of the Original Credit Agreement. The information in the Most Recent Filing is, as of its date and as of the date of this Agreement, true and correct in all material respects and does not omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.

(g) No event of default as described in Section 6.01 of the Original Credit Agreement has occurred and is continuing (without regard to notice or any applicable grace period, if any).

5. Upon the effectiveness of this Amendment pursuant to Section 3 hereof, each reference in the Original Credit Agreement to “this Agreement”, “hereunder” “hereof”, “herein” or words of like import shall mean and be a reference to the Credit Agreement, as amended hereby. The execution, delivery and effectiveness of this Amendment shall not, except as expressly provided herein, operate as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of Bank under the Credit Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any provision of the Credit Agreement.

6. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, and all counterparts so executed shall constitute one agreement, binding on all of the parties hereto, notwithstanding that all the parties are not signatory to the original or the same counterpart.

7. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Nebraska (without giving effect to conflicts of law principles).

-3-

8. This Amendment and the Credit Agreement and other Loan Documents represents the final agreement between Bank and Borrower as to the subject matter thereof and may not be contradicted by evidence of prior, contemporaneous or subsequent oral agreements of the parties. There are no unwritten oral agreements between the parties.

A CREDIT AGREEMENT MUST BE IN WRITING TO BE ENFORCEABLE UNDER NEBRASKA LAW. TO PROTECT THE PARTIES FROM ANY MISUNDERSTANDINGS OR DISAPPOINTMENTS, ANY CONTRACT, PROMISE, UNDERTAKING OR OFFER TO FOREBEAR REPAYMENT OF MONEY OR TO MAKE ANY OTHER FINANCIAL ACCOMMODATION IN CONNECTION WITH THIS LOAN OF MONEY OR GRANT OR EXTENSION OF CREDIT, OR ANY AMENDMENT OF, CANCELLATION OF, WAIVER OF, OR SUBSTITUTION FOR ANY OR ALL OF THE TERMS OR PROVISIONS OF ANY INSTRUMENT OR DOCUMENT EXECUTED IN CONNECTION WITH THIS LOAN OF MONEY OR GRANT OR EXTENSION OF CREDIT, MUST BE IN WRITING TO BE EFFECTIVE.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first written above.


		WELLS FARGO BANK,
LINDSAY CORPORATION		NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By:	Mark Roth	By:	Michael H. Wheeler
Title:	VP of Corporate Development & Treasurer	Title:	Vice President

-4-

Exhibit 10.2

LINDSAY CORPORATION

MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE UMBRELLA PLAN

1. PURPOSE. The purpose of the Lindsay Corporation Management Incentive Umbrella Plan (the “Plan”) is to provide annual or other cash awards based on financial performance criteria to executive officers that recognize and reward the achievement of corporate financial performance goals. The executive officers who participate in this Plan may also receive annual or other cash awards that are not paid under this Plan which are based on attaining individual performance objectives that are not measured based on the financial performance criteria described in this Plan or are in the nature of discretionary awards. This Plan will only apply to the portions of annual or other cash awards for executive officers that are based on financial performance criteria.

2. EFFECTIVE DATE OF PLAN. The Plan shall be effective as of January 27, 2014, upon approval of the Plan by the stockholders of Lindsay Corporation (the “Corporation”).

3. PLAN ADMINISTRATION. The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee (“Committee”) of the Board of Directors, which shall consist of two or more members appointed from time to time by the Board of Directors. Each member of the Committee shall be an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Committee shall have full power and authority, subject to the provisions of the Plan and applicable law, to: (a) establish, amend, suspend or waive such rules and regulations and appoint such agents as it deems necessary or advisable for the proper administration of the Plan, (b) construe, interpret and administer the Plan and any instrument or agreement relating to the Plan, and (c) make all other determinations and take all other actions necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan, provided that the Committee shall have no authority to take any action that would cause any award to any Participant under this Plan to fail to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code except as permitted pursuant to Section 9 hereof. Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan, each determination made and each action taken by the Committee pursuant to the Plan or any instrument or agreement relating to the Plan (a) shall be within the sole discretion of the Committee, (b) may be made at any time, and (c) shall be final, binding and conclusive for all purposes on all persons, including, but not limited to, Participants in the Plan, their legal representatives and beneficiaries and employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries.

4. ELIGIBILITY. The Chief Executive Officer and all other executive officers of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the Plan, if designated by the Committee.

5. AWARDS. Prior to or within 90 days after the commencement of each fiscal year (the “Plan Year”), the Committee shall designate the following for annual cash awards under this Plan:

5.1 The executive officers who will participate (the “Participants”) in the Plan for the Plan Year.

5.2 The Financial Performance Criteria, as defined herein, which will apply to awards for the Plan Year.

5.3 The Performance Goals, as defined herein, to be met for Participants to earn awards for the Plan Year and a payout matrix or formula for the Financial Performance Criteria and Performance Goals.

5.4 The award will be a bonus payment in an amount calculated based on the following amounts: (1) a Participant’s annualized base salary, as determined by the Committee, as of the first, last or other specified day or pro-rated for the Plan Year, (2) a specified target award percentage (expressed as a percentage or fixed by a formula which will determine such percentage) determined by the Committee to apply to the Participant for the Plan Year, and (3) the payout matrix or formula for the Financial Performance Criteria and Performance Goals established by the Committee for the Plan Year.

5.5 The Committee may, after the 90th day of the Plan Year, designate additional executive officers to participate in the Plan for the Plan Year (also “Participants” for purposes hereof); provided, however, that: (i) any award earned by any such Participant for participation for such partial Plan Year will be pro-rated based on the number of days during the Plan Year in which the Participant participated in the Plan, and (ii) the Performance Goals for such additional Participants will be established prior to or before the expiration of 25% of the days remaining in such partial Plan Year.

5.6 In addition to annual cash awards, the Committee may also provide other cash awards under this Plan with performance periods which are longer or shorter than one Plan Year. The Performance Goals for such other cash awards shall be established prior to or before the earlier of (i) the 90th day of the performance period or (ii) the expiration of 25% of the days in the performance period. Any other cash awards under the Plan shall satisfy all of the other requirements to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code.

5.7 Awards under the Plan shall be paid to the Participants in cash. A Participant (other than one who is party to an employment agreement with the Corporation or a subsidiary providing for a partial year bonus) who terminates employment, either voluntarily or involuntarily, before the payment date for awards is ineligible for an award under the Plan, unless otherwise determined by the Committee in its complete and sole discretion.

6. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE CRITERIA. For each Plan Year (or other performance period), the Committee shall designate one or more of the financial performance criteria (the “Financial Performance Criteria”) set forth in this Section 6 for use in determining an award for a Participant for such Plan Year (or other performance period). Financial Performance Criteria shall consist of one or more, or a combination of, the following financial measures, which may be described in terms of corporate-wide objectives or objectives that are related to the performance of the individual Participant or the subsidiary, division, department or function within the Corporation or subsidiary in which the Participant is employed. Financial Performance Criteria may be measured on an absolute or relative basis. Relative performance may be measured by a group of peer companies or by a financial market index. Financial Performance Criteria under this Plan shall be limited to specified levels of or increases or decreases in return on equity, earnings per share, total earnings, earnings growth, return on capital, return on assets, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and/or amortization, revenues or sales, revenues or sales growth, gross margin or operating margin, return on investment, increase in the fair market value of the Corporation’s shares, share price (including but not limited to, growth measures and total stockholder return), gross or net income or profit, operating income or profit, net earnings, cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow), cash flow return on investment (which equals net cash flow divided by total capital), inventory turns, financial return ratios, total return to shareholders, market share, earnings measures/ratios, economic value added (EVA), economic profit, Lindsay value added, balance sheet measurements such as receivable turnover, internal rate of return, increase in net present value or expense targets, working capital measurements (such as average working capital divided by sales), customer or dealer satisfaction surveys and productivity. Any Financial Performance Criteria and Performance Goals may provide for adjustments to exclude the impact of any acquisitions or dispositions of businesses by the Corporation, one-time non-operating charges, extraordinary or nonrecurring items, accounting changes (including the early adoption of any accounting change mandated by any governing body, organization or authority), changes in tax laws, impacts of discontinued operations, restatements of prior period financial results, and any other events or transactions that may result in distortion of the Financial Performance Criteria or Performance Goals.

7. PERFORMANCE GOALS. For each Plan Year (or other performance period), the Committee shall establish one or more specific, objective performance goals (the “Performance Goals”), the outcome of which are substantially uncertain at the time so established, for each of the Financial Performance Criteria designated by the Committee for the Plan Year (or other performance period), against which actual performance is to be measured to determine the amount of awards. Performance Goals established by the Committee may be described by means of a matrix or formula providing for goals resulting in the payment of awards under the Plan.

8. DETERMINATION & PAYMENT OF AWARDS

8.1 As soon as practicable after the end of the Plan Year (or other performance period), the Committee will determine the amount of the award earned by each Participant, based on application of the Financial Performance Criteria and Performance Goals established for the Plan Year (or other performance period); provided however that, except for Participants who have entered into an employment agreement with the Corporation or a subsidiary, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, reduce the amount which would otherwise be payable under the Plan. As to those Participants who have entered into employment agreements with the Corporation or a subsidiary, the Committee will not have the discretion to reduce any bonus below any minimum amount provided in such employment agreement, if any. Payments will be made promptly after determination of the awards by the Committee, unless payment of an award has been deferred pursuant to Section 10.6 hereof. Such Committee determination must include a certification in writing that the Performance Goals and any other materials terms of the award were in fact satisfied; provided that minutes of the Committee meeting (or any action by written consent) approving the awards shall satisfy the written certification requirement.

8.2 Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the maximum dollar amount that may be paid under this Plan in any Plan Year to any Participant may not exceed $2 million.

8.3 Payment of the award as determined pursuant to Section 8.1 shall be made as soon as practicable following such determination, but in no event later than the 15th day of the third month of the calendar year following the Plan Year (or other performance period) for which the award is paid.

9. TERMINATION, SUSPENSION OR MODIFICATION OF THE PLAN. The Board of Directors or Committee may at any time, with or without notice, terminate, suspend, or modify the Plan in whole or in part, except that the Board of Directors or Committee shall not amend the Plan in violation of the law or in contravention of Treasury Regulation Section 1.162-27, promulgated under the Code, unless the Board of Directors or Committee finds that such amendment is in the best interest of the Corporation. The Committee is expressly permitted to make any amendments to the Plan, which are not in violation of the law, that are required to conform the Plan to the requirements of Section 162(m). The Committee may also correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan in the manner and to the extent it shall deem desirable to carry the Plan into effect.

10. MISCELLANEOUS.

10.1 No Assignments. No award under this Plan shall be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, charge, garnishment, execution, or levy of any kind, either voluntary or involuntary, including any such liability which is for alimony or other payments for the support of a spouse or former spouse, or for any other relative of a Participant prior to actually being received by the Participant or his/her designated beneficiary in the event of the Participant’s death, and any attempt to anticipate, alienate, sell, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber, charge, or otherwise dispose of any right to such award shall be void.

10.2 No Right of Employment. Neither the adoption of the Plan, the determination of eligibility to participate in the Plan, nor the granting of an award under the Plan shall confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries or to interfere in any way with the right of the Corporation or the subsidiary to terminate such employment at any time.

10.3 Tax Withholding. The Corporation shall have the right to withhold the amount of any tax attributable to amounts payable under the Plan.

10.4 Governing Law. The Plan and all determinations under the Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.

10.5 Other Plans. Nothing in this Plan shall be construed as limiting the authority of the Committee, Board of Directors, the Corporation or any subsidiary of the Corporation to establish any other compensation plan, or as in any way limiting its or their authority to pay bonuses or supplemental compensation to any persons employed by the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation, whether or not such person is a Participant in this Plan and regardless of how the amount of such compensation or bonuses is determined.

10.6 Deferrals of Awards. A Participant may only elect to defer payment of his/her cash award under the Plan if deferral of an award under the Plan is permitted pursuant to the terms of a deferred compensation program of the Corporation existing at the time the election to defer is permitted to be made, and the Participant complies with the terms of such program.

10.7 Section 162(m). It is the intention of the Corporation that all payments made under this Plan shall fall within the “performance-based compensation” exception contained in Section 162(m) of the Code. Thus, unless the Board of Directors or Committee expressly determines otherwise, if any Plan provision is found not to be in compliance with such exception, that provision shall be deemed to be amended so that the provision does comply to the extent permitted by law, and in every event the Plan shall be construed in favor of its meeting the “performance-based compensation” exception contained in Section 162(m) of the Code.

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard W. Parod, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lindsay Corporation;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ RICHARD W. PAROD				President and Chief Executive Officer
Richard W. Parod				March 28, 2014

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, James C. Raabe, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lindsay Corporation;

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ JAMES C. RAABE				Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
James C. Raabe				March 28, 2014

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Lindsay Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended February 28, 2014, I, Richard W. Parod, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, James C. Raabe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


		/s/ R ICHARD W. P AROD
		Richard W. Parod
		President and Chief Executive Officer

		/s/ JAMES C. RAABE
		James C. Raabe
		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

		March 28, 2014

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company