NEWMONT MINING CORP /DE/ (Form: 10-Q, Received: 07/30/2014 06:04:38)

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company.)

Smaller reporting company

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2014

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-31240

LOGO

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		84-1611629
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6363 South Fiddler’s Green Circle Greenwood Village, Colorado		80111
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (303) 863-7414

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12-b2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12-b2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

There were 498,758,930 shares of common stock outstanding on July 18, 2014.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page
PART I
ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		1

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations		1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)		2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets		4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		5

ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION		43

	Overview		43
	Selected Financial and Operating Results		45
	Consolidated Financial Results		46
	Results of Consolidated Operations		52
	Liquidity and Capital Resources		62
	Environmental		65
	Accounting Developments		66
	Non-GAAP Financial Measures		66
	Safe Harbor Statement		74

ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		74

ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		76

PART II

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		77

ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS		77

ITEM 2.	ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES		77

ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES		77

ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES		77

ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION		78

ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS		78

SIGNATURES			79

EXHIBIT INDEX			80

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited, in millions except per share)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Sales (Note 3)	$	1,765		$	2,018		$	3,529		$	4,206
Costs and expenses
Costs applicable to sales ⁽¹⁾ (Note 3)		1,060			1,682			2,143			2,739
Depreciation and amortization		306			415			604			682
Reclamation and remediation (Note 4)		21			18			41			36
Exploration		41			76			75			135
Advanced projects, research and development		42			46			84			98
General and administrative		48			54			93			110
Write-downs (Note 5)		13			2,261			13			2,262
Other expense, net (Note 6)		51			77			103			176

		1,582			4,629			3,156			6,238

Other income (expense)
Other income, net (Note 7)		3			50			49			76
Interest expense, net		(94	)		(70	)		(187	)		(135	)

		(91	)		(20	)		(138	)		(59	)

Income (loss) before income and mining tax and other items		92			(2,631	)		235			(2,091	)
Income and mining tax benefit (expense) (Note 8)		53			287			(25	)		107
Equity income (loss) of affiliates		2			(3	)		2			(7	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations		147			(2,347	)		212			(1,991	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (Note 9)		(2	)		74			(19	)		74

Net income (loss)		145			(2,273	)		193			(1,917	)
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests (Note 10)		35			214			87			172

Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	$	180		$	(2,059	)	$	280		$	(1,745	)

Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders:
Continuing operations	$	182		$	(2,133	)	$	299		$	(1,819	)
Discontinued operations		(2	)		74			(19	)		74

	$	180		$	(2,059	)	$	280		$	(1,745	)

Income (loss) per common share (Note 11)
Basic:
Continuing operations	$	0.37		$	(4.29	)	$	0.60		$	(3.66	)
Discontinued operations		(0.01	)		0.15			(0.04	)		0.15

	$	0.36		$	(4.14	)	$	0.56		$	(3.51	)

Diluted:
Continuing operations	$	0.37		$	(4.29	)	$	0.60		$	(3.66	)
Discontinued operations		(0.01	)		0.15			(0.04	)		0.15

	$	0.36		$	(4.14	)	$	0.56		$	(3.51	)

Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0.025		$	0.35		$	0.175		$	0.775

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(unaudited, in millions)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Net income (loss)	$	145		$	(2,273	)	$	193		$	(1,917	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of $0, $(77), $(1) and $(115) tax benefit (expense), respectively		(55	)		(227	)		(86	)		(279	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		7			(10	)		2			(22	)
Change in pension and other post-retirement benefits, net of $1, $3, $2 and $8 tax benefit, respectively		1			6			3			11
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge instruments, net of $9, $(130), $13 and $(145) tax benefit (expense), respectively
Net change from periodic revaluations		25			(258	)		34			(237	)
Net amount reclassified to income		(13	)		(11	)		(13	)		(35	)

Net unrecognized gain (loss) on derivatives		12			(269	)		21			(272	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)		(35	)		(500	)		(60	)		(562	)

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	110		$	(2,773	)	$	133		$	(2,479	)

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to:
Newmont stockholders	$	143		$	(2,560	)	$	220		$	(2,307	)
Noncontrolling interests		(33	)		(213	)		(87	)		(172	)

	$	110		$	(2,773	)	$	133		$	(2,479	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited, in millions)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	193		$	(1,917	)
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization		604			682
Stock based compensation and other non-cash benefits		27			38
Reclamation and remediation		41			36
Loss (income) from discontinued operations		19			(74	)
Write-downs		13			2,262
Impairment of marketable securities		1			11
Deferred income taxes		(92	)		(480	)
Gain on asset and investment sales, net		(52	)		(1	)
Other operating adjustments and write-downs		260			632
Net change in operating assets and liabilities (Note 24)		(453	)		(457	)

Net cash provided from continuing operations		561			732
Net cash used in discontinued operations		(6	)		(11	)

Net cash provided from operations		555			721

Investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and mine development		(489	)		(1,120	)
Acquisitions, net		(28	)		(13	)
Sale of marketable securities		25			1
Purchases of marketable securities		(1	)		(1	)
Proceeds from sale of other assets		76			49
Other		(11	)		(21	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(428	)		(1,105	)

Financing activities:
Proceeds from debt, net		18			987
Repayment of debt		(5	)		(534	)
Proceeds from stock issuance, net		—			2
Sale of noncontrolling interests		68			32
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests		(4	)		(10	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests		(4	)		(2	)
Dividends paid to common stockholders		(89	)		(385	)
Other		(11	)		(3	)

Net cash provided from (used in) financing activities		(27	)		87

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(2	)		(16	)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		98			(313	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1,555			1,561

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1,653		$	1,248

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited, in millions)


	At June 30,			At December 31,
	2014			2013
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,653		$	1,555
Trade receivables		147			230
Accounts receivable		299			252
Investments (Note 16)		84			78
Inventories (Note 17)		863			717
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads (Note 18)		775			805
Deferred income tax assets		287			246
Other current assets (Note 19)		1,246			1,006

Current assets		5,354			4,889
Property, plant and mine development, net		14,043			14,277
Investments (Note 16)		347			439
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads (Note 18)		2,773			2,680
Deferred income tax assets		1,611			1,478
Other long-term assets (Note 19)		848			844

Total assets	$	24,976		$	24,607

LIABILITIES
Debt (Note 20)	$	112		$	595
Accounts payable		435			478
Employee-related benefits		232			341
Income and mining taxes		52			13
Other current liabilities (Note 21)		1,421			1,313

Current liabilities		2,252			2,740
Debt (Note 20)		6,673			6,145
Reclamation and remediation liabilities (Note 4)		1,531			1,513
Deferred income tax liabilities		730			635
Employee-related benefits		345			323
Other long-term liabilities (Note 21)		354			342

Total liabilities		11,885			11,698

Commitments and contingencies (Note 26)
EQUITY
Common stock		798			789
Additional paid-in capital		8,636			8,538
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(242	)		(182	)
Retained earnings		1,039			848

Newmont stockholders’ equity		10,231			9,993
Noncontrolling interests		2,860			2,916

Total equity		13,091			12,909

Total liabilities and equity	$	24,976		$	24,607

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (“interim statements”) of Newmont Mining Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Newmont” or the “Company”) are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments and disclosures necessary for a fair presentation of these interim statements have been included. The results reported in these interim statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be reported for the entire year. These interim statements should be read in conjunction with Newmont’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed on June 13, 2014 on Form 8-K. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from the audited financial statements and, in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q, certain information and footnote disclosures required by United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. References to “A$” refer to Australian currency, “C$” to Canadian currency and “NZ$” to New Zealand currency.

On February 18, 2014 the Company redeemed all outstanding exchangeable shares (other than those held by Newmont and its affiliates). On the date of the redemption, holders of exchangeable shares received, in exchange for each exchangeable share, one share of common stock of Newmont. At December 31, 2013, the value of the remaining outstanding exchangeable shares was included in Additional paid-in capital and Common shares.

Certain amounts in prior years have been reclassified to conform to the 2014 presentation.

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Risks and Uncertainties

As a global mining company, our revenue, profitability and future rate of growth are substantially dependent on prevailing prices for gold, copper and, to a lesser extent, silver. Historically, the commodity markets have been very volatile, and there can be no assurance that commodity prices will not be subject to wide fluctuations in the future. A substantial or extended decline in commodity prices could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, access to capital and on the quantities of reserves that we can economically produce. The carrying value of our property, plant and mine development assets, inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads, and deferred tax assets are particularly sensitive to the outlook for commodity prices. A decline in our long term price outlook from current levels could result in material impairment charges related to these assets.

We are currently subject to an export ban at our Batu Hijau copper mine in Indonesia. In early 2014, the Indonesian government issued new regulations that impose new export conditions, an export duty and a January 2017 ban on the export of copper concentrate, all of which violate the Contract of Work signed by the Government of Indonesia and PT Newmont Nusa Tenggara (“PTNNT”) and the bilateral investment treaty between Indonesia and the Netherlands. While the 2009 mining law preserves the validity of PTNNT’s Contract of Work (the investment agreement entered into by PTNNT and the Indonesian government in 1986, which includes the right to export copper concentrates and a prohibition against new taxes, duties, and levies), the Indonesian government has stated its intention to enforce the new regulations on PTNNT’s operations and has not yet recognized PTNNT’s rights to export copper concentrate and only pay the taxes, duties, and levies specified in the Contract of Work. The Company believes that these new 2014 regulations conflict with the Contract of Work. Although PTNNT is continuing to engage with government officials in Indonesia in an effort to resolve this issue and gain clarity on implementation of the new regulations, the Company can make no assurances that the new regulations will not continue to impact operations or outlook for the Batu Hijau operation for an extended period. In June 2014, the Company invoked the force majeure clause in its Contract of Work due to these export issues and placed the Batu Hijau operations on care and maintenance. In July 2014, the Company filed international arbitration against the Government of Indonesia.

As a result of placing the Batu Hijau copper mine on care and maintenance, we have evaluated, and will continue to evaluate, the need for asset impairments, inventory write-downs, tax valuation allowances and other applicable accounting charges due to the status of the mine. PTNNT will continue to incur various costs during the care and maintenance period.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Discontinued Operations

In April 2014, ASC guidance was issued related to Discontinued Operations which changed the criteria for determining which disposals can be presented as discontinued operations and modified related disclosure requirements. The updated guidance requires an entity to only classify discontinued operations due to a major strategic shift or a major effect on an entity’s operations in the financial statements. The updated guidance will also require additional disclosures relating to discontinued operations. The Company early adopted this guidance prospectively at the beginning of fiscal year January 1, 2014. Adoption of the new guidance did not have an impact on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit

In July 2013, ASC guidance was issued related to the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward exists. The updated guidance requires an entity to net its unrecognized tax benefits against the deferred tax assets for all same jurisdiction net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or tax credit carryforwards. A gross presentation will be required only if such carryforwards are not available or would not be used by the entity to settle any additional income taxes resulting from disallowance of the uncertain tax position. Adoption of the new guidance, effective for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2014, had no impact on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Foreign Currency Matters

In March 2013, ASC guidance was issued related to foreign currency matters to clarify the treatment of cumulative translation adjustments when a parent sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a business within a foreign entity. The updated guidance also resolves the diversity in practice for the treatment of business combinations achieved in stages in a foreign entity. Adoption of the new guidance, effective for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2014, had no impact on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Stock based compensation

In June 2014, ASU guidance was issued to resolve the diversity of practice relating to the accounting for stock based performance awards that the performance target could be achieved after the employee completes the required service period. The update is effective prospectively or retrospectively beginning January 1, 2015. The Company does not expect the updated guidance to have an impact on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, ASU guidance was issued related to revenue from contracts with customers. The new standard provides a five-step approach to be applied to all contracts with customers and also requires expanded disclosures about revenue recognition. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods and is to be retrospectively applied. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it will have on its consolidated financial statements.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

NOTE 3 SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company’s reportable segments are based upon the Company’s management structure that is focused on the geographic region for the Company’s operations. Geographic regions include North America, South America, Australia/New Zealand, Indonesia, Africa and Corporate and Other. Segment results for 2013 have been retrospectively revised to reflect a change in our reportable segments to align with a change in the chief operating decision makers’ evaluation of the organization, effective in the first quarter of 2014. The Nevada operations have been revised to reflect Carlin, Phoenix, and Twin Creeks segments and Other Australia/New Zealand operations have been revised to reflect Tanami, Jundee, Waihi and Kalgoorlie segments. The Conga development project will be reported in the Other South America segment. The Nimba and Merian development projects, historically reported in Other Africa and Other South America, respectively, will be reported in Corporate and Other. The financial information relating to the Company’s segments for all periods presented have been updated to reflect these changes.

On July 1, 2014, the Company completed the sale of its Jundee underground gold mine in Australia to Northern Star Resources Limited for total proceeds of approximately $94. As of June 30, 2014, total assets and total liabilities were $119 and $50, respectively.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)


	Sales		Costs Applicable to Sales		Depreciation and Amortization		Advanced Projects and Exploration		Pre-Tax Income (Loss)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
Carlin	$	268	$	209	$	43	$	7	$	3
Phoenix:
Gold		72		35		9
Copper		39		30		5

Total		111		65		14		—		30
Twin Creeks		125		49		9		3		62
La Herradura		59		26		10		2		20
Other North America		—		—		—		6		(7	)

North America		563		349		76		18		108

Yanacocha		240		184		84		9		(53	)
Other South America		—		—		—		9		(24	)

South America		240		184		84		18		(77	)

Boddington:
Gold		190		133		24
Copper		38		32		6

Total		228		165		30		—		27
Tanami		119		63		18		4		33
Jundee		97		43		17		—		37
Waihi		52		19		7		1		24
Kalgoorlie		96		65		4		2		22
Other Australia/New Zealand		—		—		5		1		(13	)

Australia/New Zealand		592		355		81		8		130

Batu Hijau:
Gold		10		9		3
Copper		59		54		17

Total		69		63		20		1		(33	)
Other Indonesia		—		—		—		—		(1	)

Indonesia		69		63		20		1		(34	)

Ahafo		156		65		17		5		71
Akyem		145		44		21		—		74
Other Africa		—		—		—		3		(5	)

Africa		301		109		38		8		140

Corporate and Other		—		—		7		30		(175	)

Consolidated	$	1,765	$	1,060	$	306	$	83	$	92

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)


	Sales		Costs Applicable to Sales		Depreciation and Amortization		Advanced Projects and Exploration		Pre-Tax Income (Loss)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Carlin	$	290	$	169	$	27	$	8	$	80
Phoenix:
Gold		80		37		8
Copper		25		15		3

Total		105		52		11		3		37
Twin Creeks		188		80		22		3		80
La Herradura		71		42		7		15		8
Other North America		—		—		—		13		(17	)

North America		654		343		67		42		188

Yanacocha		420		201		97		10		83
Other South America		—		—		—		2		(5	)

South America		420		201		97		12		78

Boddington:
Gold		249		252		59
Copper		49		62		14

Total		298		314		73		—		(2,200	)
Tanami		83		64		17		3		(116	)
Jundee		105		51		21		3		30
Waihi		34		25		8		1		—
Kalgoorlie		110		123		8		1		(17	)
Other Australia/New Zealand		—		—		3		4		(25	)

Australia/New Zealand		630		577		130		12		(2,328	)

Batu Hijau:
Gold		15		63		13
Copper		99		413		81

Total		114		476		94		5		(477	)
Other Indonesia		—		—		—		—		(1	)

Indonesia		114		476		94		5		(478	)

Ahafo		200		85		20		11		84
Akyem		—		—		—		2		(2	)
Other Africa		—		—		—		4		(8	)

Africa		200		85		20		17		74

Corporate and Other		—		—		7		34		(165	)

Consolidated	$	2,018	$	1,682	$	415	$	122	$	(2,631	)

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)


	Sales		Costs Applicable to Sales		Depreciation and Amortization		Advanced Projects and Exploration		Pre-Tax Income (Loss)			Capital Expenditures ⁽¹⁾
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Carlin	$	561	$	401	$	78	$	11	$	64		$	102
Phoenix:
Gold		142		69		14
Copper		71		56		8

Total		213		125		22		1		59			16
Twin Creeks		257		104		20		4		173			60
La Herradura		90		42		18		6		23			14
Other North America		—		—		—		12		(16	)		6

North America		1,121		672		138		34		303			198

Yanacocha		505		405		185		16		(140	)		35
Other South America		—		—		—		17		(32	)		15

South America		505		405		185		33		(172	)		50

Boddington:
Gold		410		275		49
Copper		77		72		12

Total		487		347		61		—		64			46
Tanami		224		118		35		5		61			38
Jundee		179		85		34		1		58			15
Waihi		85		38		12		1		31			5
Kalgoorlie		214		142		10		3		55			5
Other Australia/New Zealand		—		—		9		2		(25	)		4

Australia/New Zealand		1,189		730		161		12		244			113
Batu Hijau:
Gold		18		17		5
Copper		101		111		30

Total		119		128		35		2		(84	)		31
Other Indonesia		—		—		—		—		(1	)		—

Indonesia		119		128		35		2		(85	)		31

Ahafo		297		126		33		14		115			60
Akyem		298		82		42		—		162			—
Other Africa		—		—		—		5		(8	)		—

Africa		595		208		75		19		269			60

Corporate and Other		—		—		10		59		(324	)		12

Consolidated	$	3,529	$	2,143	$	604	$	159	$	235		$	464

⁽¹⁾	Includes a decrease in accrued capital expenditures of $25; consolidated capital expenditures on a cash basis were $489.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)


	Sales		Costs Applicable to Sales		Depreciation and Amortization		Advanced Projects and Exploration		Pre-Tax Income (Loss)			Capital Expenditures ⁽¹⁾
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Carlin	$	641	$	348	$	59	$	19	$	208		$	119
Phoenix:
Gold		133		78		15
Copper		36		26		5

Total		169		104		20		7		33			68
Twin Creeks		354		132		40		6		172			43
La Herradura		161		82		13		21		45			64
Other North America		—		—		—		21		(26	)		13

North America		1,325		666		132		74		432			307

Yanacocha		875		361		167		23		276			89
Other South America		—		—		—		5		(7	)		161

South America		875		361		167		28		269			250

Boddington:
Gold		578		426		101
Copper		114		110		24

Total		692		536		125		—		(2,085	)		54
Tanami		181		139		33		5		(112	)		44
Jundee		229		105		37		7		80			23
Waihi		84		53		16		2		12			8
Kalgoorlie		230		198		13		2		22			5
Other Australia/New Zealand		—		—		5		8		(37	)		3

Australia/New Zealand		1,416		1,031		229		24		(2,120	)		137

Batu Hijau:
Gold		26		70		15
Copper		169		460		90

Total		195		530		105		11		(481	)		56
Other Indonesia		—		—		—		—		2			—

Indonesia		195		530		105		11		(479	)		56

Ahafo		395		151		37		24		187			117
Akyem		—		—		—		5		(7	)		154
Other Africa		—		—		—		6		(17	)		—

Africa		395		151		37		35		163			271

Corporate and Other		—		—		12		61		(356	)		48

Consolidated	$	4,206	$	2,739	$	682	$	233	$	(2,091	)	$	1,069

⁽¹⁾	Includes a decrease in accrued capital expenditures of $51; consolidated capital expenditures on a cash basis were $1,120.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

NOTE 4 RECLAMATION AND REMEDIATION

The Company’s Reclamation and remediation expense consisted of:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Accretion—operating	$	18	$	15	$	36	$	30
Accretion—non-operating		3		3		5		6

	$	21	$	18	$	41	$	36

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $1,457 and $1,432, respectively, were accrued for reclamation obligations relating to operating properties. In addition, the Company is involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former, primarily historic, mining activities. Generally, these matters concern developing and implementing remediation plans at the various sites involved. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $165 and $179, respectively, were accrued for such obligations. These amounts are also included in Reclamation and remediation liabilities .

The following is a reconciliation of Reclamation and remediation liabilities :


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,611		$	1,539
Additions, changes in estimates and other		(7	)		(3	)
Liabilities settled		(23	)		(24	)
Accretion expense		41			36

Balance at end of period	$	1,622		$	1,548

The current portion of Reclamation and remediation liabilities of $91 and $98 at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, are included in Other current liabilities (see Note 21).

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

NOTE 5 WRITE-DOWNS


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Property, plant and mine development
Yanacocha	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1
Other South America		13		—		13		—
Boddington		—		2,107		—		2,107
Tanami		—		66		—		66
Batu Hijau		—		1		—		1

		13		2,174		13		2,175

Other long-term assets
Boddington		—		31		—		31
Tanami		—		56		—		56

		—		87		—		87

	$	13	$	2,261	$	13	$	2,262

Write-downs totaled $13 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, and $2,261 and $2,262 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. The 2014 write-downs are primarily related to non-essential equipment in Other South America. The 2013 write-downs were primarily due to a decrease in the Company’s long-term gold and copper price assumptions during the second quarter to $1,400 per ounce and $3.00 per pound, respectively, combined with rising operating costs. These factors represented significant changes in the business, requiring the Company to evaluate for impairment. For purposes of this evaluation, estimates of future cash flows of the individual reporting units were used to determine fair value. The estimated cash flows were derived from life-of-mine plans, developed using long-term pricing reflective of the current price environment and projections for operating costs.

Due to the above conditions in 2013, Goodwill was included in the Company’s impairment analysis. After-tax discounted future cash flows of reporting units with Goodwill were analyzed. Goodwill had a carrying value of $188 at December 31, 2012. As a result of this evaluation, the Company recorded an impairment of $56 at Tanami, resulting in a carrying value of $132 at June 30, 2013.

NOTE 6 OTHER EXPENSE, NET


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Regional administration	$	16	$	18	$	31	$	36
Community development		15		17		26		30
Restructuring and other		6		21		13		30
Western Australia power plant		1		7		7		11
Transaction/Acquisition costs		—		—		—		45
Other		13		14		26		24

	$	51	$	77	$	103	$	176

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

NOTE 7 OTHER INCOME, NET


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Gain on Midas sale	$	—		$	—		$	47		$	—
Refinery Income, net		5			4			9			7
Gain on sale of investments, net		1			—			5			—
Development projects, net		—			7			2			8
Interest		1			2			2			6
Canadian Oil Sands dividends		—			11			—			21
Derivative ineffectiveness, net		—			(3	)		—			—
Impairment of marketable securities		—			(7	)		(1	)		(11	)
Foreign currency exchange, net		(10	)		40			(24	)		37
Other		6			(4	)		9			8

	$	3		$	50		$	49		$	76

NOTE 8 INCOME AND MINING TAXES

During the second quarter of 2014, the Company recorded an estimated income and mining tax benefit of $53, resulting in an effective tax rate of (58)%. Estimated income and mining tax benefit during the second quarter of 2013 was $287 for an effective tax rate of 12%. During the first half of 2014, the estimated income and mining tax expense was $25, resulting in an effective tax rate of 10%. Estimated income and mining tax benefit during the first half of 2013 was $107 for an effective tax rate of 7%.

The Company’s income and mining tax expense differed from the amounts computed by applying the United States statutory corporate income tax rate for the following reasons:


	Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014						2013						2014						2013
Income (loss) before income and mining tax and other items				$	92					$	(2,631	)				$	235					$	(2,091	)

Tax at statutory rate		35	%	$	32			35	%	$	(921	)		35	%	$	82			35	%	$	(732	)
Reconciling items:
Percentage depletion		(21	)%		(19	)		2	%		(52	)		(13	)%		(30	)		4	%		(93	)
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets		(81	)%		(75	)		(26	)%		723			(27	)%		(62	)		(33	)%		728
Mining and other Taxes		5	%		5			(1	)%		18			3	%		8			(1	)%		36
Disallowed loss on Midas Sale					—						—			6	%		13						—
Effect of foreign earnings, net of credits		3	%		3			(1	)%		20			4	%		9			(1	)%		16
Other		1	%		1			3	%		(75	)		2	%		5			3	%		(62	)

Income and mining tax expense (benefit)		(58	)%	$	(53	)		12	%	$	(287	)		10	%	$	25			7	%	$	(107	)

The difference in effective tax rates is due to the following: (i) a 2014 release of valuation allowance on some of the Company’s tax credits related to the settlement of an income tax audit (ii) a larger impact in 2014 from percentage depletion, partially offset by (iii) a 2014 increase in the rate associated with mining taxes.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

A valuation allowance is provided for those deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related benefits will not be realized. In determining the amount of the valuation allowance, each quarter the Company considers future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, estimated future taxable income, taxable income in prior carryback year(s), as well as feasible tax planning strategies in each jurisdiction to determine if the deferred tax assets are realizable. If it is determined that the Company will not realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets, it will place or increase a valuation allowance. Conversely, if determined that it will ultimately be able to realize all or a portion of the related benefits for which a valuation allowance has been provided, all or a portion of the related valuation allowance will be reduced. There are a number of risk factors that could impact the Company’s ability to realize the deferred tax assets. See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Risks and Uncertainties.

The Company operates in numerous countries around the world and accordingly it is subject to, and pays annual income taxes under, the various income tax regimes in the countries in which it operates. Some of these tax regimes are defined by contractual agreements with the local government, and others are defined by the general corporate income tax laws of the country. The Company has historically filed, and continues to file, all required income tax returns and pay the income taxes reasonably determined to be due. The tax rules and regulations in many countries are highly complex and subject to interpretation. From time to time the Company is subject to a review of its historic income tax filings and in connection with such reviews, disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation or application of certain rules to the Company’s business conducted within the country involved.

At June 30, 2014, the Company’s total unrecognized tax benefit was $396 for uncertain income tax positions taken or expected to be taken on income tax returns. Of this, $33 represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective income tax rate.

As a result of the statute of limitations that expire in the next 12 months in various jurisdictions, and possible settlements of audit-related issues with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions with respect to which none of the issues are individually significant, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of its net unrecognized income tax benefits will decrease by approximately $5 to $10 in the next 12 months.

NOTE 9 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Discontinued operations include Holloway Mining Company, which owned the Holt-McDermott property (“Holt property”) that was sold to St. Andrew Goldfields Ltd. (“St. Andrew”) in 2006. In 2009, the Superior Court issued a decision finding Newmont Canada Corporation (“Newmont Canada”) liable for a sliding scale royalty on production from the Holt property, which was upheld in 2011 by the Ontario Court of Appeal. During the second quarter of 2014, the Company recorded a charge of $2, net of tax benefits of $1, related to a decrease in discount rates offset by a decrease in gold price. During the first half of 2014, the Company recorded a charge from discontinued operations of $19, net of tax benefit of $9, related to an increase in gold price, an increase in expected future production and a decrease in discount rates. During the second quarter of 2013, the Company recorded a benefit of $74, net of tax expense of $34, related to a decline in the gold spot price and an increase in discount rates. During the first half of 2013, the Company recorded a benefit from discontinued operations of $74, net of tax expense of $34, related to a decline in the gold spot price and an increase in discount rates.

Net operating cash used in discontinued operations of $6 and $11 in the first half of 2014 and 2013 respectively relates to payments on the Holt property royalty.

NOTE 10 NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Minera Yanacocha	$	(20	)	$	24		$	(49	)	$	81
Batu Hijau		(10	)		(238	)		(33	)		(241	)
TMAC		(6	)		(2	)		(7	)		(14	)
Other		1			2			2			2

	$	(35	)	$	(214	)	$	(87	)	$	(172	)

Newmont has a 51.35% ownership interest in Minera Yanacocha S.R.L. (“Yanacocha”), with the remaining interests held by Compañia de Minas Buenaventura, S.A.A. (43.65%) and the International Finance Corporation (5%).

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

Newmont has a 48.5% effective economic interest in PT Newmont Nusa Tenggara (“PTNNT”) with remaining interests held by an affiliate of Sumitomo Corporation of Japan and various Indonesian entities. PTNNT operates the Batu Hijau copper and gold mine in Indonesia. Based on ASC guidance for variable interest entities, Newmont consolidates PTNNT in its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Newmont’s economic ownership interest in TMAC was reduced to 45.2% from 70.4% in April 2014 due to TMAC’s private placement to raise funds. The remaining interests are held by TMAC management and various outside investors.

NOTE 11 INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

Basic income per common share is computed by dividing income available to Newmont common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income per common share is computed similarly except that weighted average common shares is increased to reflect all dilutive instruments.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders
Continuing operations	$	182		$	(2,133	)	$	299		$	(1,819	)
Discontinued operations		(2	)		74			(19	)		74

	$	180		$	(2,059	)	$	280		$	(1,745	)

Weighted average common shares (millions):
Basic		499			497			498			497
Effect of employee stock-based awards		—			—			1			—

Diluted		499			497			499			497

Income (loss) per common share
Basic:
Continuing operations	$	0.37		$	(4.29	)	$	0.60		$	(3.66	)
Discontinued operations		(0.01	)		0.15			(0.04	)		0.15

	$	0.36		$	(4.14	)	$	0.56		$	(3.51	)

Diluted:
Continuing operations	$	0.37		$	(4.29	)	$	0.60		$	(3.66	)
Discontinued operations		(0.01	)		0.15			(0.04	)		0.15

	$	0.36		$	(4.14	)	$	0.56		$	(3.51	)

Options to purchase 3 and 4 million shares of common stock at average exercise prices of $48 and $48 were outstanding at June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average common shares because their exercise prices exceeded the average price of the Company’s common stock for the respective periods presented.

Other outstanding options to purchase 1 million shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average common shares in the second quarter and first half of 2013 because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

Newmont is required to settle the principal amount of its 2014 and 2017 Convertible Senior Notes in cash and may elect to settle the remaining conversion premium (average share price in excess of the conversion price), if any, in cash, shares or a combination thereof. The effect of contingently convertible instruments on diluted earnings per share is calculated under the net share settlement method in accordance with ASC guidance. The conversion price exceeded the Company’s share price for the periods presented, therefore no additional shares were included in the computation of diluted weighted average common shares.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

NOTE 12 EMPLOYEE PENSION AND OTHER BENEFIT PLANS


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Pension benefit costs, net
Service cost	$	7		$	9		$	13		$	18
Interest cost		10			10			20			20
Expected return on plan assets		(13	)		(13	)		(26	)		(25	)
Amortization		4			10			7			18
Settlements		3			—			3			—

	$	11		$	16		$	17		$	31


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Other benefit costs, net
Service cost	$	—		$	1		$	1		$	2
Interest cost		1			2			3			3

	$	1		$	3		$	4		$	5

NOTE 13 STOCK BASED COMPENSATION


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Stock options	$	1	$	2	$	2	$	5
Restricted stock units		8		7		15		16
Performance leveraged stock units		2		2		5		4
Strategic performance units		2		3		5		3

	$	13	$	14	$	27	$	28

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

NOTE 14 FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING

The following table sets forth the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by accounting guidance, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.


	Fair Value at June 30, 2014
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Cash equivalents	$	861	$	861	$	—	$	—
Marketable equity securities:
Extractive industries		244		244		—		—
Other		16		16		—		—
Marketable debt securities:
Asset backed commercial paper		24		—		—		24
Auction rate securities		6		—		—		6
Trade receivable from provisional copper and gold concentrate sales, net		111		111		—		—
Derivative instruments, net:
Diesel forward contracts		4		—		4		—

	$	1,266	$	1,232	$	4	$	30

Liabilities:
Derivative instruments, net:
Foreign exchange forward contracts	$	30	$	—	$	30	$	—
Boddington contingent consideration		10		—		—		10
Holt property royalty		155		—		—		155

	$	195	$	—	$	30	$	165

The fair values of the derivative instruments in the table above are presented on a net basis. The gross amounts related to the fair value of the derivatives instruments above are included in the Derivatives Instruments Note (see Note 15). All other Fair Value disclosures in the above table are presented on a gross basis.

The following table sets forth a summary of the quantitative and qualitative information related to the unobservable inputs used in the calculation of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets and liabilities at June 30, 2014:


Description	At June 30, 2014		Valuation technique	Unobservable input	Range/Weighted average
Auction Rate Securities	$	6	Discounted cash flow	Weighted average recoverability rate		80	%
Asset Backed Commercial Paper		24	Discounted cash flow	Recoverability rate		90	%
Boddington Contingent Consideration		10	Monte Carlo	Discount rate		5	%
				Long Term Gold price	$	1,300
				Long Term Copper price	$	3.00
Holt property royalty		155	Monte Carlo	Weighted average discount rate		4	%
				Long Term Gold price	$	1,300

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets and liabilities at June 30, 2014:


	Auction Rate Securities		Asset Backed Commercial Paper			Total Assets		Boddington Contingent Royalty		Holt Property Royalty			Total Liabilities
Balance at beginning of period	$	5	$	25		$	30	$	10	$	134		$	144
Settlements		—		—			—		—		(6	)		(6	)
Revaluation		1		(1	)		—		—		27			27

Balance at end of period	$	6	$	24		$	30	$	10	$	155		$	165

At June 30, 2014, assets and liabilities classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy represent 2% and 85%, respectively, of total assets and liabilities measured at fair value.

NOTE 15 DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

The Company’s strategy is to provide shareholders with leverage to changes in gold and copper prices by selling its production at spot market prices. Consequently, the Company does not hedge its gold and copper sales. The Company continues to manage certain risks associated with commodity input costs, interest rates and foreign currencies using the derivative market. All of the derivative instruments described below were transacted for risk management purposes and qualify as cash flow hedges.

Cash Flow Hedges

The foreign currency and diesel contracts are designated as cash flow hedges, and as such, the effective portion of unrealized changes in market value have been recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and are reclassified to income during the period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses from hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in current earnings .

Foreign Currency Contracts

Newmont had the following foreign currency derivative contracts outstanding at June 30, 2014:


	Expected Maturity Date
	2014			2015			2016			2017			2018			Total/ Average
A$ Operating Fixed Forward Contracts:
A$ notional (millions)		153			270			158			105			6			692
Average rate ($/A$)		0.99			0.98			0.95			0.93			0.92			0.97
Expected hedge ratio		19	%		18	%		11	%		7	%		4	%
NZ$ Operating Fixed Forward Contracts:
NZ$ notional (millions)		32			47			7			—			—			86
Average rate ($/NZ$)		0.80			0.80			0.81			—			—			0.80
Expected hedge ratio		62	%		38	%		14	%		—			—

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

Diesel Fixed Forward Contracts

Newmont had the following diesel derivative contracts outstanding at June 30, 2014:


	Expected Maturity Date
													Total/
	2014			2015			2016			2017			Average
Diesel Fixed Forward Contracts:
Diesel gallons (millions)		12			18			10			2			42
Average rate ($/gallon)		2.85			2.78			2.69			2.67			2.77
Expected Nevada hedge ratio		60	%		46	%		26	%		8	%

Derivative Instrument Fair Values

Newmont had the following derivative instruments designated as hedges at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:


	Fair Value
	At June 30, 2014
	Other Current Assets		Other Long- Term Assets		Other Current Liabilities		Other Long- Term Liabilities
Foreign currency exchange contracts:
A$ operating fixed forwards	$	—	$	—	$	16	$	19
NZ$ operating fixed forwards		4		1		—		—
Diesel fixed forwards		2		2		—		—

Total derivative instruments (Notes 19 and 21)	$	6	$	3	$	16	$	19


	Fair Value
	At December 31, 2013
	Other Current Assets		Other Long- Term Assets		Other Current Liabilities		Other Long- Term Liabilities
Foreign currency exchange contracts:
A$ operating fixed forwards	$	—	$	—	$	36	$	60
NZ$ operating fixed forwards		1		—		—		—
Diesel fixed forwards		3		1		—		—

Total derivative instruments (Notes 19 and 21)	$	4	$	1	$	36	$	60

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

The following tables show the location and amount of gains (losses) reported in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements related to the Company’s cash flow hedges.


	Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts					Diesel Forward Contracts					Forward Starting Swap Contracts
	2014		2013			2014		2013			2014			2013
For the three months ended June 30,
Cash flow hedging relationships:
Gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) (effective portion)	$	18	$	(386	)	$	3	$	(6	)	$	—		$	—
Gain (loss) reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income into income (loss) (effective portion) ⁽¹⁾		22		22			1		(4	)		(4	)		(6	)
Gain (loss) reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into income (ineffective portion) ⁽²⁾		—		—			—		(3	)		—			—
For the six months ended June 30,
Cash flow hedging relationships:
Gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) (effective portion)	$	52	$	(368	)	$	1	$	(4	)	$	—		$	—
Gain (loss) reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income into income (loss) (effective portion) ⁽¹⁾		27		60			1		—			(9	)		(9	)

⁽¹⁾	The gain (loss) recognized for the effective portion of cash flow hedges is included in Cost Applicable to Sales, Write-downs and Interest expense , net .

⁽²⁾	The ineffective portion recognized for cash flow hedges is included in Other income , net .

Based on fair values at June 30, 2014 the amount to be reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) , net of tax to income for derivative instruments during the next 12 months is a gain of approximately $3.

Provisional Copper and Gold Sales

The Company’s provisional copper and gold sales contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale of the gold and copper concentrates at the prevailing indices’ prices at the time of sale. The embedded derivative, which does not qualify for hedge accounting, is marked to market through earnings each period prior to final settlement.

London Metal Exchange (“LME”) copper prices averaged $3.08 per pound during the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared with the Company’s recorded average provisional price of $3.12 per pound before mark-to-market adjustments and treatment and refining charges. LME copper prices averaged $3.14 per pound during the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared with the Company’s recorded average provisional price of $3.13 per pound before mark-to-market adjustments and treatment and refining charges. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, changes in copper prices resulted in a provisional pricing mark-to-market gain of $6 ($0.14 per pound) and loss of $11 ($0.13 per pound), respectively. At June 30, 2014, Newmont had copper sales of 48 million pounds priced at an average of $3.15 per pound, subject to final pricing over the next several months.

The average London P.M. fix for gold was $1,288 per ounce during the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared with the Company’s recorded average provisional price of $1,287 per ounce before mark-to-market adjustments and treatment and refining charges. The average London P.M. fix for gold was $1,291 per ounce during the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to the Company’s recorded average provisional price of $1,290 per ounce before mark-to-market adjustments and treatment and refining charges. During the three months ended June 30, 2014 there was minimal fluctuation in the gold price, resulting in a provisional pricing mark-to-market close to nil. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, changes in gold prices resulted in a gain of $5 ($2 per ounce). At June 30, 2014, Newmont had gold sales of 54,000 ounces priced at an average of $1,311 per ounce, subject to final pricing over the next several months.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

NOTE 16 INVESTMENTS


	At June 30, 2014
	Cost/Equity		Unrealized					Fair/Equity
	Basis		Gain		Loss			Basis
Current:
Marketable Equity Securities:
Gabriel Resources Ltd.	$	37	$	8	$	—		$	45
Other		29		13		(3	)		39

	$	66	$	21	$	(3	)	$	84

Long-term:
Marketable Debt Securities:
Asset backed commercial paper	$	23	$	1	$	—		$	24
Auction rate securities		8		—		(2	)		6

		31		1		(2	)		30

Marketable Equity Securities:
Regis Resources Ltd.		165		—		(15	)		150
Other		21		6		(1	)		26

		186		6		(16	)		176


Other investments, at cost		20		—		—			20

Investment in Affiliates:
Euronimba Ltd.		2		—		—			2
Minera La Zanja S.R.L.		104		—		—			104
Novo Resources Corp.		15		—		—			15

	$	358	$	7	$	(18	)	$	347

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)


	At December 31, 2013
	Cost/Equity		Unrealized					Fair/Equity
	Basis		Gain		Loss			Basis
Current:
Marketable Equity Securities:
Gabriel Resources Ltd.	$	37	$	—	$	—		$	37
Paladin Energy Ltd.		21		1		—			22
Other		19		4		(4	)		19

	$	77	$	5	$	(4	)	$	78

Long-term:
Marketable Debt Securities:
Asset backed commercial paper	$	23	$	2	$	—		$	25
Auction rate securities		8		—		(3	)		5

		31		2		(3	)		30

Marketable Equity Securities:
Regis Resources Ltd.		165		88		—			253
Other		30		5		—			35

		195		93		—			288

Other investments, at cost		13		—		—			13
Investment in Affiliates:
Minera La Zanja S.R.L.		92		—		—			92
Novo Resources Corp.		16		—		—			16

	$	347	$	95	$	(3	)	$	439

In March 2014, the Company sold its investment in Paladin Energy Ltd. for $25, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $4 recorded in Other income, net . In June 2014, the Company completed the sale of its investment in Leyshon Energy Ltd. for $1, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $1 recorded in Other income, net.

The following tables present the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s investments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:


	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or Greater				Total
At June 30, 2014	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Marketable equity securities	$	158	$	19	$	—	$	—	$	158	$	19
Auction rate securities		—		—		6		2		6		2

	$	158	$	19	$	6	$	2	$	164	$	21


	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or Greater				Total
At December 31, 2013	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Marketable equity securities	$	54	$	4	$	—	$	—	$	54	$	4
Auction rate securities		—		—		5		3		5		3

	$	54	$	4	$	5	$	3	$	59	$	7

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

While the fair value of the Company’s investments in marketable equity securities and auction rate securities are below their respective cost, the Company views these declines as temporary. The Company has the ability and intends to hold its auction rate securities until maturity or such time that the market recovers.

NOTE 17 INVENTORIES


	At June 30,		At December 31,
	2014		2013
In-process	$	115	$	97
Concentrate		239		108
Precious metals		22		26
Materials, supplies and other		487		486

	$	863	$	717

The Company recorded write-downs of $1 and $2, classified as components of Costs applicable to sales and Depreciation and amortization , respectively, for the first half of 2014, to reduce the carrying value of Yanacocha’s inventories to net realizable value.

NOTE 18 STOCKPILES AND ORE ON LEACH PADS


	At June 30,		At December 31,
	2014		2013
Current:
Stockpiles	$	528	$	580
Ore on leach pads		247		225

	$	775	$	805

Long-term:
Stockpiles	$	2,564	$	2,434
Ore on leach pads		209		246

	$	2,773	$	2,680

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)


	At June 30,		At December 31,
	2014		2013
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads:
Carlin	$	412	$	439
Phoenix		115		109
Twin Creeks		309		327
La Herradura		92		57
Yanacocha		368		504
Boddington		329		304
Tanami		8		12
Jundee		7		7
Waihi		3		2
Kalgoorlie		113		107
Batu Hijau		1,379		1,290
Ahafo		335		292
Akyem		78		35

	$	3,548	$	3,485

The Company recorded write-downs of $182 and $62, classified as components of Costs applicable to sales and Depreciation and a mortization , respectively, for the first half of 2014 to reduce the carrying value of stockpiles and ore on leach pads to net realizable value. Adjustments to net realizable value are a result of current and prior stripping and the associated historical and estimated future processing costs in relation to the Company’s long term price assumptions. Of the write-downs in 2014, $65 are related to Carlin, $5 to Twin Creeks, $87 to Yanacocha, $50 to Boddington and $37 to Batu Hijau.

NOTE 19 OTHER ASSETS


	At June 30,		At December 31,
	2014		2013
Other current assets:
Refinery metal inventory and receivable	$	802	$	679
Prepaid assets		305		157
Other refinery metal receivables		97		130
Derivative instruments		6		4
Other		36		36

	$	1,246	$	1,006

Other long-term assets:
Income tax receivable	$	249	$	229
Goodwill		132		132
Intangible assets		114		98
Prepaid royalties		103		103
Restricted cash		99		95
Debt issuance costs		62		62
Prepaid maintenance costs		40		31
Derivative instruments		3		1
Other		46		93

	$	848	$	844

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

NOTE 20 DEBT

Scheduled minimum debt repayments are $51 for the remainder of 2014, $168 in 2015, $221 in 2016, $771 in 2017, $1 in 2018 and $5,680 thereafter.

Term Loan and Revolver Extension

On March 31, 2014, the Company entered into a $575 uncollateralized term loan facility with a syndicate of banks. The term loan allows for a single drawing any business day on or prior to July 15, 2014 (the “Funding Date”) and will mature five years after the Funding Date. Borrowings under the facility will bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.875% to 1.65%. Fees and other debt issuance costs related to the facility will be capitalized and amortized over the term of the debt. There are no borrowings outstanding under the facility at June 30, 2014.

On July 11, 2014, the Company borrowed $575 under the new term loan facility. The loan will mature July 11, 2019. Proceeds were used to retire the $575 convertible debt due on July 15, 2014. As such, the convertible debt has been reclassified to long-term on the balance sheet at June 30, 2014.

On March 31, 2014, the Company’s Corporate Revolving Credit Facility was amended to extend the facility two years to 2019. The available capacity under the Corporate Revolving Credit Facility remains at $3,000. There are no borrowings outstanding under the facility at June 30, 2014.

NOTE 21 OTHER LIABILITIES


	At June 30,		At December 31,
	2014		2013
Other current liabilities:
Refinery metal payable	$	802	$	679
Deferred income tax		142		74
Accrued operating costs		135		157
Reclamation and remediation liabilities		91		98
Interest		75		74
Accrued capital expenditures		47		72
Royalties		32		58
Derivative instruments		16		36
Holt property royalty		14		15
Taxes other than income and mining		11		6
Other		56		44

	$	1,421	$	1,313

Other long-term liabilities:
Holt property royalty	$	141	$	119
Income and mining taxes		105		70
Power supply agreements		41		39
Derivative instruments		19		60
Boddington contingent consideration		10		10
Other		38		44

	$	354	$	342

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

NOTE 22 CHANGES IN EQUITY


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013
Common stock:
At beginning of period	$	789		$	787
Redemptions of Exchangeable Shares		8			—
Stock based awards		1			2

At end of period		798			789

Additional paid-in capital:
At beginning of period		8,538			8,428
Redemption of Exchangeable Shares		(8	)		—
Stock based awards ⁽¹⁾		74			53
Sale of noncontrolling interests		32			48

At end of period		8,636			8,529

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
At beginning of period		(182	)		490
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(60	)		(562	)

At end of period		(242	)		(72	)

Retained earnings:
At beginning of period		848			3,992
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders		280			(1,745	)
Dividends Paid		(89	)		(385	)

At end of period		1,039			1,862

Noncontrolling interests:
At beginning of period		2,916			3,175
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		(87	)		(172	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests		(4	)		(2	)
Sale of noncontrolling interests, net		35			10

At end of period		2,860			3,011

Total equity	$	13,091		$	14,119

⁽¹⁾

A 2014 balance sheet adjustment of $21 was recorded during the current quarter to correct the presentation of stock based compensation cost as a component of additional paid-in capital, which was previously included as a current employee-related benefit liability. We concluded that the unadjusted balance of $46 was immaterial to the comparative December 31, 2013 balance sheet.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

NOTE 23 RECLASSIFICATIONS OUT OF ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)


	Unrealized (loss) on marketable securities, net			Foreign currency translation adjustments		Pension and other post- retirement benefit adjustments			Changes in fair value of cash flow hedge instruments			Total
December 31, 2013	$	(35	)	$	145	$	(124	)	$	(168	)	$	(182	)
Change in other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		(83	)		2		(2	)		34			(49	)
Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(3	)		—		5			(13	)		(11	)

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)		(86	)		2		3			21			(60	)

June 30, 2014	$	(121	)	$	147	$	(121	)	$	(147	)	$	(242	)


Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components	Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)												Affected Line Item in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
	Three Months Ended June 30, 2014			Three Months Ended June 30, 2013			Six Months Ended June 30, 2014			Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Marketable securities adjustments:
Sale of marketable securities	$	(1	)	$	—		$	(5	)	$	—		Other income, net
Impairment of marketable securities		—			7			1			11		Other income, net

Total before tax		(1	)		7			(4	)		11
Tax benefit (expense)		—			(2	)		1			(3	)

Net of tax	$	(1	)	$	5		$	(3	)	$	8

Pension liability adjustments:
Amortization, net	$	4		$	10		$	7		$	18		(1)

Total before tax		4			10			7			18
Tax benefit (expense)		(1	)		(3	)		(2	)		(6	)

Net of tax	$	3		$	7		$	5		$	12

Hedge instruments adjustments:
Operating cash flow hedges	$	(23	)	$	(43	)	$	(28	)	$	(79	)	Costs applicable to sales
Capital cash flow hedges		—			1			—			1		Depreciation and amortization
Capital cash flow hedges		—			18			—			18		Write-downs
Forward starting swap hedges		4			6			9			9		Interest expense, net
Hedge ineffectiveness		—			3			—			—		Other income, net

Total before tax		(19	)		(15	)		(19	)		(51	)
Tax benefit (expense)		6			4			6			16

Net of tax	$	(13	)	$	(11	)	$	(13	)	$	(35	)

Total reclassifications for the period, net of tax	$	(11	)	$	1		$	(11	)	$	(15	)

⁽¹⁾

This accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) component is included in General and administrative and costs that benefit the inventory/production process. Refer to Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed June 13, 2014 on Form 8-K for information on costs that benefit the inventory/production process.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

NOTE 24 NET CHANGE IN OPERATING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Net cash provided from operations attributable to the net change in operating assets and liabilities is composed of the following:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013
Decrease (increase) in operating assets:
Trade and accounts receivable	$	68		$	187
Inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads		(359	)		(399	)
EGR refinery assets		(123	)		623
Other assets		(47	)		8
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities		(92	)		(229	)
EGR refinery liabilities		123			(623	)
Reclamation liabilities		(23	)		(24	)

	$	(453	)	$	(457	)

NOTE 25 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements are presented to satisfy disclosure requirements of Rule 3-10(e) of Regulation S-X resulting from the inclusion of Newmont USA Limited (“Newmont USA”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Newmont, as a co-registrant with Newmont on debt securities issued under a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed under the Securities Act of 1933 under which securities of Newmont (including debt securities guaranteed by Newmont USA) may be issued (the “Shelf Registration Statement”). In accordance with Rule 3-10(e) of Regulation S-X, Newmont USA, as the subsidiary guarantor, is 100% owned by Newmont, the guarantees are full and unconditional, and no other subsidiary of Newmont guaranteed any security issued under the Shelf Registration Statement. There are no restrictions on the ability of Newmont or Newmont USA to obtain funds from its subsidiaries by dividend or loan.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
													Newmont
	Newmont												Mining
	Mining			Newmont			Other						Corporation
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operation	Corporation			USA			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Sales	$	—		$	485		$	1,280		$	—		$	1,765
Costs and expenses
Costs applicable to sales ⁽¹⁾		—			304			756			—			1,060
Depreciation and amortization		1			71			234			—			306
Reclamation and remediation		—			3			18			—			21
Exploration		—			5			36			—			41
Advanced projects, research and development		—			10			32			—			42
General and administrative		—			27			21			—			48
Write-downs		—			—			13			—			13
Other expense, net		—			9			42			—			51

		1			429			1,152			—			1,582

Other income (expense)
Other income, net		(3	)		(2	)		8			—			3
Interest income—intercompany		30			—			3			(33	)		—
Interest expense—intercompany		(3	)		—			(30	)		33			—
Interest expense, net		(83	)		(1	)		(10	)		—			(94	)

		(59	)		(3	)		(29	)		—			(91	)

Income (loss) before income and mining tax and other items		(60	)		53			99			—			92
Income and mining tax benefit (expense)		11			(8	)		50			—			53
Equity income (loss) of affiliates		229			58			23			(308	)		2

Income (loss) from continuing operations		180			103			172			(308	)		147
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		—			—			(2	)		—			(2	)

Net income (loss)		180			103			170			(308	)		145
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			23			12			35

Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	$	180		$	103		$	193		$	(296	)	$	180

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	143		$	112		$	145		$	(290	)	$	110
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			24			9			33

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	$	143		$	112		$	169		$	(281	)	$	143

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
													Newmont
	Newmont												Mining
	Mining			Newmont			Other						Corporation
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operation	Corporation			USA			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Sales	$	—		$	541		$	1,477		$	—		$	2,018
Costs and expenses
Costs applicable to sales ⁽¹⁾		—			271			1,411			—			1,682
Depreciation and amortization		—			48			367			—			415
Reclamation and remediation		—			2			16			—			18
Exploration		—			17			59			—			76
Advanced projects, research and development		—			10			36			—			46
General and administrative		—			24			30			—			54
Write-downs		—			—			2,261			—			2,261
Other expense, net		—			15			62			—			77

		—			387			4,242			—			4,629

Other income (expense)
Other income, net		2			6			42			—			50
Interest income—intercompany		34			8			5			(47	)		—
Interest expense—intercompany		(3	)		—			(44	)		47			—
Interest expense, net		(68	)		(4	)		2			—			(70	)

		(35	)		10			5			—			(20	)

Income (loss) before income and mining tax and other items		(35	)		164			(2,760	)		—			(2,631	)
Income and mining tax benefit (expense)		12			(71	)		346			—			287
Equity income (loss) of affiliates		(2,036	)		(505	)		(172	)		2,710			(3	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations		(2,059	)		(412	)		(2,586	)		2,710			(2,347	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		—			—			74			—			74

Net income (loss)		(2,059	)		(412	)		(2,512	)		2,710			(2,273	)
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			328			(114	)		214

Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	$	(2,059	)	$	(412	)	$	(2,184	)	$	2,596		$	(2,059	)

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(2,559	)	$	(424	)	$	(3,062	)	$	3,272		$	(2,773	)
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			328			(115	)		213

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	$	(2,559	)	$	(424	)	$	(2,734	)	$	3,157		$	(2,560	)

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
													Newmont
	Newmont												Mining
	Mining			Newmont			Other						Corporation
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operation	Corporation			USA			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Sales	$	—		$	985		$	2,544		$	—		$	3,529
Costs and expenses
Costs applicable to sales ⁽¹⁾		—			602			1,541			—			2,143
Depreciation and amortization		2			125			477			—			604
Reclamation and remediation		—			5			36			—			41
Exploration		—			9			66			—			75
Advanced projects, research and development		—			21			63			—			84
General and administrative		—			46			47			—			93
Write-downs		—			—			13			—			13
Other expense, net		—			15			88			—			103

		2			823			2,331			—			3,156

Other income (expense)
Other income, net		(4	)		58			(5	)		—			49
Interest income—intercompany		60			—			5			(65	)		—
Interest expense—intercompany		(5	)		—			(60	)		65			—
Interest expense, net		(165	)		(2	)		(20	)		—			(187	)

		(114	)		56			(80	)		—			(138	)

Income (loss) before income and mining tax and other items		(116	)		218			133			—			235
Income and mining tax benefit (expense)		40			(46	)		(19	)		—			(25	)
Equity income (loss) of affiliates		356			(93	)		6			(267	)		2

Income (loss) from continuing operations		280			79			120			(267	)		212
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		—			—			(19	)		—			(19	)

Net income (loss)		280			79			101			(267	)		193
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			89			(2	)		87

Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	$	280		$	79		$	190		$	(269	)	$	280

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	220		$	90		$	61		$	(238	)	$	133
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			89			(2	)		87

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	$	220		$	90		$	150		$	(240	)	$	220

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
													Newmont
	Newmont												Mining
	Mining			Newmont			Other						Corporation
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operation	Corporation			USA			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Sales	$	—		$	1,084		$	3,122		$	—		$	4,206
Costs and expenses
Costs applicable to sales ⁽¹⁾		—			532			2,207			—			2,739
Depreciation and amortization		—			96			586			—			682
Reclamation and remediation		—			4			32			—			36
Exploration		—			28			107			—			135
Advanced projects, research and development		—			23			75			—			98
General and administrative		—			54			56			—			110
Write-downs		—			—			2,262			—			2,262
Other expense, net		—			30			146			—			176

		—			767			5,471			—			6,238

Other income (expense)
Other income, net		2			9			65			—			76
Interest income—intercompany		82			15			10			(107	)		—
Interest expense—intercompany		(6	)		—			(101	)		107			—
Interest expense, net		(133	)		(6	)		4			—			(135	)

		(55	)		18			(22	)		—			(59	)

Income (loss) before income and mining tax and other items		(55	)		335			(2,371	)		—			(2,091	)
Income and mining tax benefit (expense)		19			(121	)		209			—			107
Equity income (loss) of affiliates		(1,709	)		(391	)		(129	)		2,222			(7	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations		(1,745	)		(177	)		(2,291	)		2,222			(1,991	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		—			—			74			—			74

Net income (loss)		(1,745	)		(177	)		(2,217	)		2,222			(1,917	)
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			262			(90	)		172

Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	$	(1,745	)	$	(177	)	$	(1,955	)	$	2,132		$	(1,745	)

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(2,306	)	$	(185	)	$	(2,874	)	$	2,886		$	(2,479	)
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			262			(90	)		172

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	$	(2,306	)	$	(185	)	$	(2,612	)	$	2,796		$	(2,307	)

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Depreciation and a mortization and Reclamation and remediation .

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
													Newmont
	Newmont												Mining
	Mining			Newmont			Other						Corporation
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows	Corporation			USA			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	280		$	79		$	101		$	(267	)	$	193
Adjustments		(343	)		356			534			274			821
Net change in operating assets and liabilities		(39	)		(22	)		(392	)		—			(453	)

Net cash provided from (used in) continuing operations		(102	)		413			243			7			561
Net cash used in discontinued operations		—			—			(6	)		—			(6	)

Net cash provided from (used in) operations		(102	)		413			237			7			555

Investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and mine development		—			(172	)		(317	)		—			(489	)
Acquisitions, net		—			—			(28	)		—			(28	)
Sale of marketable securities		25			—			—			—			25
Purchases of marketable securities		—			—			(1	)		—			(1	)
Proceeds from sale of other assets		—			3			73			—			76
Other		—			—			(11	)		—			(11	)

Net cash provided from (used in) investing activities		25			(169	)		(284	)		—			(428	)

Financing activities:
Proceeds from debt, net		(7	)		—			25			—			18
Repayment of debt		—			—			(5	)		—			(5	)
Net intercompany borrowings (repayments)		173			(116	)		(52	)		(5	)		—
Sale of noncontrolling interests		—			—			68			—			68
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests		—			—			(4	)		—			(4	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests		—			—			(9	)		5			(4	)
Dividends paid to common stockholders		(89	)		—			7			(7	)		(89	)
Other		—			—			(11	)		—			(11	)

Net cash provided from (used in) financing activities		77			(116	)		19			(7	)		(27	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		—			—			(2	)		—			(2	)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		—			128			(30	)		—			98
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		—			428			1,127			—			1,555

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	—		$	556		$	1,097		$	—		$	1,653

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
													Newmont
	Newmont												Mining
	Mining			Newmont			Other						Corporation
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows	Corporation			USA			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(1,745	)	$	(177	)	$	(2,217	)	$	2,222		$	(1,917	)
Adjustments		1,774			536			3,022			(2,226	)		3,106
Net change in operating assets and liabilities		(16	)		(251	)		(190	)		—			(457	)

Net cash provided from (used in) continuing operations		13			108			615			(4	)		732
Net cash used in discontinued operations		—			—			(11	)		—			(11	)

Net cash provided from (used in) operations		13			108			604			(4	)		721

Investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and mine development		—			(230	)		(890	)		—			(1,120	)
Acquisitions, net		—			—			(13	)		—			(13	)
Sale of marketable securities		—			—			1			—			1
Purchases of marketable securities		—			—			(1	)		—			(1	)
Proceeds from sale of other assets		—			—			49			—			49
Other		—			—			(21	)		—			(21	)

Net cash used in investing activities		—			(230	)		(875	)		—			(1,105	)

Financing activities:
Proceeds from debt, net		739			—			248			—			987
Repayment of debt		(429	)		—			(105	)		—			(534	)
Net intercompany borrowings (repayments)		60			(215	)		158			(3	)		—
Proceeds from stock issuance, net		2			—			—			—			2
Sale of noncontrolling interests		—			—			32			—			32
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests		—			—			(10	)		—			(10	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests		—			—			(5	)		3			(2	)
Dividends paid to common stockholders		(385	)		—			(4	)		4			(385	)
Other		—			—			(3	)		—			(3	)

Net cash provided from (used in) financing activities		(13	)		(215	)		311			4			87

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		—			—			(16	)		—			(16	)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		—			(337	)		24			—			(313	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		—			342			1,219			—			1,561

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	—		$	5		$	1,243		$	—		$	1,248

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)


	At June 30, 2014
										Newmont
	Newmont									Mining
	Mining		Newmont		Other					Corporation
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet	Corporation		USA		Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—	$	556	$	1,097	$	—		$	1,653
Trade receivables		—		52		95		—			147
Accounts receivable		—		7		292		—			299
Intercompany receivable		3,095		6,100		5,613		(14,808	)		—
Investments		—		1		83		—			84
Inventories		—		146		717		—			863
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads		—		378		397		—			775
Deferred income tax assets		4		155		128		—			287
Other current assets		—		81		1,165		—			1,246

Current assets		3,099		7,476		9,587		(14,808	)		5,354
Property, plant and mine development, net		30		3,062		10,994		(43	)		14,043
Investments		—		13		334		—			347
Investments in subsidiaries		14,396		4,275		2,876		(21,547	)		—
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads		—		453		2,320		—			2,773
Deferred income tax assets		728		435		938		(490	)		1,611
Long-term intercompany receivable		2,153		62		408		(2,623	)		—
Other long-term assets		47		209		592		—			848

Total assets	$	20,453	$	15,985	$	28,049	$	(39,511	)	$	24,976

Liabilities
Debt	$	—	$	1	$	111	$	—		$	112
Accounts payable		—		64		371		—			435
Intercompany payable		3,768		4,647		6,393		(14,808	)		—
Employee-related benefits		—		94		138		—			232
Income and mining taxes		—		1		51		—			52
Other current liabilities		72		119		1,230		—			1,421

Current liabilities		3,840		4,926		8,294		(14,808	)		2,252
Debt		6,141		6		526		—			6,673
Reclamation and remediation liabilities		—		179		1,352		—			1,531
Deferred income tax liabilities		—		25		1,195		(490	)		730
Employee-related benefits		5		177		163		—			345
Long-term intercompany payable		236		—		2,430		(2,666	)		—
Other long-term liabilities		—		53		301		—			354

Total liabilities		10,222		5,366		14,261		(17,964	)		11,885

Equity
Newmont stockholders’ equity		10,231		10,619		9,211		(19,830	)		10,231
Noncontrolling interests		—		—		4,577		(1,717	)		2,860

Total equity		10,231		10,619		13,788		(21,547	)		13,091

Total liabilities and equity	$	20,453	$	15,985	$	28,049	$	(39,511	)	$	24,976

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)


	At December 31, 2013
										Newmont
	Newmont									Mining
	Mining		Newmont		Other					Corporation
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet	Corporation		USA		Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—	$	428	$	1,127	$	—		$	1,555
Trade receivables		—		21		209		—			230
Accounts receivable		—		23		229		—			252
Intercompany receivable		1,400		6,089		5,672		(13,161	)		—
Investments		22		1		55		—			78
Inventories		—		146		571		—			717
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads		—		358		447		—			805
Deferred income tax assets		3		157		86		—			246
Other current assets		—		73		933		—			1,006

Current assets		1,425		7,296		9,329		(13,161	)		4,889
Property, plant and mine development, net		32		3,026		11,263		(44	)		14,277
Investments		—		7		432		—			439
Investments in subsidiaries		13,982		5,158		2,807		(21,947	)		—
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads		—		512		2,168		—			2,680
Deferred income tax assets		694		466		844		(526	)		1,478
Long-term intercompany receivable		3,204		62		367		(3,633	)		—
Other long-term assets		46		223		575		—			844

Total assets	$	19,383	$	16,750	$	27,785	$	(39,311	)	$	24,607

Liabilities
Debt	$	561	$	1	$	33	$	—		$	595
Accounts payable		—		80		398		—			478
Intercompany payable		3,092		5,404		4,665		(13,161	)		—
Employee-related benefits		—		175		166		—			341
Income and mining taxes		—		—		13		—			13
Other current liabilities		71		161		1,081		—			1,313

Current liabilities		3,724		5,821		6,356		(13,161	)		2,740
Debt		5,556		7		582		—			6,145
Reclamation and remediation liabilities		—		176		1,337		—			1,513
Deferred income tax liabilities		—		23		1,138		(526	)		635
Employee-related benefits		5		169		149		—			323
Long-term intercompany payable		196		—		3,481		(3,677	)		—
Other long-term liabilities		—		20		322		—			342

Total liabilities		9,481		6,216		13,365		(17,364	)		11,698

Equity
Newmont stockholders’ equity		9,902		10,534		9,816		(20,259	)		9,993
Noncontrolling interests		—		—		4,604		(1,688	)		2,916

Total equity		9,902		10,534		14,420		(21,947	)		12,909

Total liabilities and equity	$	19,383	$	16,750	$	27,785	$	(39,311	)	$	24,607

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

NOTE 26 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

General

The Company follows ASC guidance in accounting for loss contingencies. Accordingly, estimated losses from contingencies are accrued by a charge to income when information available prior to issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that a liability could be incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal expenses associated with the contingency are expensed as incurred. If a loss contingency is not probable or reasonably estimable, disclosure of the contingency and estimated range of loss, if determinable, is made in the financial statements when it is at least reasonably possible that a material loss could be incurred.

Operating Segments

The Company’s operating segments are identified in Note 3. Except as noted in this paragraph, all of the Company’s commitments and contingencies specifically described in this Note 26 relate to the Corporate and Other reportable segment. The Yanacocha matters relate to the Yanacocha reportable segment. The Minera Penmont matters relate to the La Herradura reporting segment. The PTNNT matters relate to the Batu Hijau reportable segment.

Environmental Matters

The Company’s mining and exploration activities are subject to various laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are continually changing and are generally becoming more restrictive. The Company conducts its operations so as to protect the public health and environment and believes its operations are in compliance with applicable laws and regulations in all material respects. The Company has made, and expects to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the full amount of such future expenditures.

Estimated future reclamation costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $1,457 and $1,432, respectively, were accrued for reclamation costs relating to currently or recently producing mineral properties in accordance with asset retirement obligation guidance. The current portions of $62 and $66 at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, are included in Other current liabilities .

In addition, the Company is involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former mining activities. Generally, these matters concern developing and implementing remediation plans at the various sites involved. The Company believes that the related environmental obligations associated with these sites are similar in nature with respect to the development of remediation plans, their risk profile and the compliance required to meet general environmental standards. Based upon the Company’s best estimate of its liability for these matters, $165 and $179 were accrued for such obligations at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. These amounts are included in Other current liabilities and Reclamation and remediation liabilities . Depending upon the ultimate resolution of these matters, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the liability for these matters could be as much as 140% greater or 1% lower than the amount accrued at June 30, 2014. The amounts accrued are reviewed periodically based upon facts and circumstances available at the time. Changes in estimates are recorded in Reclamation and remediation in the period estimates are revised.

Details about certain of the more significant matters involved are discussed below.

Newmont Mining Corporation

Empire Mine. On July 19, 2012, the California Department of Parks and Recreation (“Parks”) served Newmont, New Verde Mines LLC, Newmont North America Exploration Limited, Newmont Realty Company and Newmont USA Limited with a complaint for damages and declaratory relief under CERCLA, specifically for costs associated with water treatment at the Empire Mine State Park and for a declaration that Newmont is liable for past and future response costs, as well as indemnification to Parks. In 1975 Parks purchased the Empire Mine site in Grass Valley, California from Newmont to create a historic state park featuring the mining of the Empire Mine. Parks has operated the Empire Mine Site for over 35 years. Newmont intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit. Newmont cannot reasonably predict the outcome of this matter.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

Newmont USA Limited—100% Newmont Owned

Ross-Adams Mine Site. By letter dated June 5, 2007, the U.S. Forest Service notified Newmont that it had expended approximately $0.3 in response costs to address environmental conditions at the Ross-Adams mine in Prince of Wales, Alaska, and requested Newmont USA Limited pay those costs and perform an Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (“EE/CA”) to assess what future response activities might need to be completed at the site. Newmont intends to vigorously defend any formal claims by the EPA. Newmont has agreed to perform the EE/CA. Newmont cannot reasonably predict the likelihood or outcome of any future action against it arising from this matter.

Hope Bay Mining Ltd.—100% Newmont Owned

In July 2011 Environment Canada Enforcement Officers discovered a release of drill water containing calcium chloride on Hope Bay Mining Ltd. (“HBML”) property in Nunavut, Canada. Orbit Garant Drilling Inc. (“Orbit”) operated a diamond drill rig on the HBML property. On February 13, 2013, HBML received service of a summons and charges from a Judge for Nunavut alleging violation of the Fisheries Act relating to the release of drill water and alleged failure to report a discharge. Orbit operated the drill at issue in the summons. On June 17, 2014, the Crown withdrew all charges against HBML and Orbit following a Cambridge Bay, Canada community meeting to discuss the discovered release and response actions, publication of facts relating to the release and response actions in local community newspapers and contribution of $.075 by each HBML and Orbit to the Environmental Damages Fund administered by Environment Canada.

Other Legal Matters

Minera Yanacocha S.R.L. (“Yanacocha”)—51.35% Newmont Owned

Choropampa . In June 2000, a transport contractor of Yanacocha spilled approximately 151 kilograms of elemental mercury near the town of Choropampa, Peru, which is located 53 miles (85 kilometers) southwest of the Yanacocha mine. Elemental mercury is not used in Yanacocha’s operations but is a by-product of gold mining and was sold to a Lima firm for use in medical instruments and industrial applications. A comprehensive health and environmental remediation program was undertaken by Yanacocha in response to the incident. In August 2000, Yanacocha paid under protest a fine of 1,740,000 Peruvian soles (approximately $0.5) to the Peruvian government. Yanacocha has entered into settlement agreements with a number of individuals impacted by the incident. As compensation for the disruption and inconvenience caused by the incident, Yanacocha entered into agreements with and provided a variety of public works in the three communities impacted by this incident. Yanacocha cannot predict the likelihood of additional expenditures related to this matter.

Additional lawsuits relating to the Choropampa incident were filed against Yanacocha in the local courts of Cajamarca, Peru, in May 2002 by over 900 Peruvian citizens. A significant number of the plaintiffs in these lawsuits entered into settlement agreements with Yanacocha prior to filing such claims. In April 2008, the Peruvian Supreme Court upheld the validity of these settlement agreements, which the Company expects to result in the dismissal of all claims brought by previously settled plaintiffs. Yanacocha has also entered into settlement agreements with approximately 350 additional plaintiffs. The claims asserted by approximately 200 plaintiffs remain. In 2011, Yanacocha was served with 23 complaints alleging grounds to nullify the settlements entered into between Yanacocha and the plaintiffs. Yanacocha has answered the complaints and the court has dismissed several of the matters and the plaintiffs have filed appeals. All appeals were referred to the Civil Court of Cajamarca, which affirmed the decisions of the lower court judge. The plaintiffs have filed appeals of such orders before the Supreme Court. Some of these appeals were dismissed by the Supreme Court in favor of Yanacocha, and others are pending resolution. Yanacocha will continue to vigorously defend its position. Neither the Company nor Yanacocha can reasonably estimate the ultimate loss relating to such claims.

Administrative Actions . The Peruvian government agency responsible for environmental evaluation and inspection, Organismo Evaluacion y Fiscalizacion Ambiental (“OEFA”), conducts periodic reviews of the Yanacocha site. In 2011, 2012, and 2013, OEFA issued notices of alleged violations of OEFA standards to Yanacocha and Conga relating to past inspections. In April 2013, OEFA issued a finding and penalty with respect to three 2008 allegations in the amount of $0.1, and another finding and penalty in June 2014 with respect to 2011 allegations in the amount of $.071. OEFA issued notice of additional alleged violations of OEFA standards in October 2013. Total fines for all outstanding OEFA alleged violations remain dependent upon the number of units associated with the alleged violations. The alleged violations currently range from zero to 96,156 units, with each unit having a potential fine equivalent to approximately $.00136. Yanacocha and Conga are responding to all notices of alleged violations, but cannot reasonably predict the outcome of the agency allegations.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

Minera Penmont- 44% Newmont Owned

Newmont owns a 44% interest in the La Herradura joint venture and related gold properties (Herradura, Soledad-Dipolos and Noche Buena), which are located in the Sonora desert. La Herradura is operated by Fresnillo PLC (“Fresnillo”) through Minera Penmont S. de R.L. de C.V. (“Minera Penmont”) and Fresnillo owns the remaining 56% interest. Soledad-Dipolos commenced operations in January 2010. In 2009 five members of the El Bajio agrarian community in the state of Sonora (the “Claimants”), who claim rights over certain surface land in the proximity of the operations of Minera Penmont, lodged a legal claim with the Unitarian Agrarian Court of Hermosillo, Sonora to have Minera Penmont vacate an area of this surface land and associated claims. The land in dispute encompasses a portion of surface area where part of the operations of Dipolos, one of Minera Penmont’s three operating mines, is located as well as the processing plant for both the Dipolos mine and the Soledad mine. Minera Penmont’s mining concessions are held by way of separate title to that relating to the surface land. In September 2012, the Claimants obtained a ruling on the surface property dispute in their favor by the Mexican Supreme Court and in July 2013, a magistrate ordered Minera Penmont to vacate the property at issue, requiring cessation of production at the Dipolos operations. Minera Penmont has presented several claims and counterclaims in vigorous defense of this matter. Claimants also obtained temporary suspension of all of Minera Penmont’s explosives permits. On February 26, 2014, Fresnillo announced that the Mexican Ministry of Defense granted an explosives permit for the Herradura and Noche Buena mining units; thereby enabling the re-establishment of mining operations.

PT Newmont Nusa Tenggara (“PTNNT”) – 31.5% Newmont Owned

Divestiture: Under the Batu Hijau Contract of Work, beginning in 2006 and continuing through 2010, a portion of PTNNT’s shares were required to be offered for sale, first, to the Indonesian government or, second, to Indonesian nationals, equal to the difference between the following percentages and the percentage of shares already owned by the Indonesian government or Indonesian nationals (if such number is positive): 23% by March 31, 2006; 30% by March 31, 2007; 37% by March 31, 2008; 44% by March 31, 2009; and 51% by March 31, 2010. As PT Pukuafu Indah (“PTPI”), an Indonesian national, owned a 20% interest in PTNNT at all relevant times, in 2006, a 3% interest was required to be offered for sale and, in each of 2007 through 2010, an additional 7% interest was required to be offered (for an aggregate 31% interest). The price at which such interests were offered for sale to the Indonesian parties was the fair market value of such interest considering PTNNT as a going concern, as agreed with the Indonesian government. Following certain disputes and an arbitration with the Indonesian government, in November and December 2009, sale agreements were concluded pursuant to which the 2006, 2007 and 2008 shares were sold to PT Multi Daerah Bersaing (“PTMDB”), the nominee of the local governments, and the 2009 shares were sold to PTMDB in February 2010, resulting in PTMDB owning a 24% interest in PTNNT.

On December 17, 2010, the Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources, acting on behalf of the Indonesian government, accepted the offer to acquire the final 7% interest in PTNNT. Subsequently, the Indonesian government designated Pusat Investasi Pemerintah (“PIP”), an agency of the Ministry of Finance, as the entity that will buy the final stake. On May 6, 2011, PIP and the foreign shareholders entered into a definitive agreement for the sale and purchase of the final 7% divestiture stake, subject to receipt of approvals from certain Indonesian government ministries. Subsequent to signing the agreement, a disagreement arose between the Ministry of Finance and the Indonesian parliament in regard to whether parliamentary approval was needed to allow PIP to make the share purchase. In July 2012, the Constitutional Court ruled that parliament approval is required for PIP to use state funds to purchase the shares, which approval has not yet been obtained. Further disputes may arise in regard to the divestiture of the 2010 shares.

WALHI: In September 2011, an Indonesian non-governmental organization named Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia (‘WALHI”) brought an administrative law claim against Indonesia’s Ministry of Environment to challenge the May 2011 renewal of PTNNT’s submarine tailings permit. PTNNT and the regional government of KSB (“KSB”) filed separate applications for intervention into the proceedings, both of which were accepted by the Administrative Court. KSB intervened on the side of WALHI, and PTNNT joined on the side of the Ministry of Environment. On April 3, 2012, the Administrative Court ruled in favor of the Ministry of Environment and PTNNT, finding that the Ministry of Environment properly renewed the permit in accordance with Indonesian law and regulations. WALHI appealed the verdict. On October 2, 2012, the High Administrative Law Court rejected WALHI’s appeal, after which WALHI filed a notice to appeal the case to the Supreme Court. On May 28, 2013, the Supreme Court of Indonesia updated its website to provide that WALHI’s appeal in this matter was rejected. The parties are still awaiting the written decision from the court. PTNNT will continue to defend its submarine tailings permit and is confident that the Ministry of Environment acted properly in renewing PTNNT’s permit.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

Export Issue: On June 27, 2014, PTNNT and its majority shareholder Nusa Tenggara Partnership B.V. (“NTPBV,” a Dutch entity) submitted a request for arbitration to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) against the Government of Indonesia seeking relief from application of recent Indonesian export regulations. The recent export regulations impose new export conditions, an export duty and a January 2017 ban on the export of copper concentrate, all of which violate the Contract of Work signed by the Government of Indonesia and PTNNT and the bilateral investment treaty between Indonesia and the Netherlands. PTNNT and NTPBV intend to request provisional measures of the ICSID tribunal seeking to allow PTNNT to resume exporting copper concentrate under the existing terms of the Contract of Work during the pendency of the arbitration. PTNNT and NTPBV intend to vigorously pursue this action, but cannot reasonably predict the outcome.

NWG Investments Inc. v. Fronteer Gold Inc.

In April 2011, Newmont acquired Fronteer Gold Inc. (“Fronteer”).

Fronteer acquired NewWest Gold Corporation (“NewWest Gold”) in September 2007. At the time of that acquisition, NWG Investments Inc. (“NWG”) owned approximately 86% of NewWest Gold and an individual named Jacob Safra owned or controlled 100% of NWG. Prior to its acquisition of NewWest Gold, Fronteer entered into a June 2007 lock-up agreement with NWG providing that, among other things, NWG would support Fronteer’s acquisition of NewWest Gold. At that time, Fronteer owned approximately 42% of Aurora Energy Resources Inc. (“Aurora”), which, among other things, had a uranium exploration project in Labrador, Canada.

NWG contends that, during the negotiations leading up to the lock-up agreement, Fronteer represented to NWG that Aurora would commence uranium mining in Labrador by 2013, that this was a firm date, that Fronteer was not aware of any obstacle to doing so, that Aurora faced no serious environmental issues in Labrador and that Aurora’s competitors faced greater delays in commencing uranium mining. NWG further contends that it entered into the lock-up agreement and agreed to support Fronteer’s acquisition of NewWest Gold in reliance upon these purported representations. On October 11, 2007, less than three weeks after the Fronteer-NewWest Gold transaction closed, a member of the Nunatsiavut Assembly introduced a motion calling for the adoption of a moratorium on uranium mining in Labrador. On April 8, 2008, the Nunatsiavut Assembly adopted a three-year moratorium on uranium mining in Labrador. NWG contends that Fronteer was aware during the negotiations of the NWG/Fronteer lock-up agreement that the Nunatsiavut Assembly planned on adopting this moratorium and that its adoption would preclude Aurora from commencing uranium mining by 2013, but Fronteer nonetheless fraudulently induced NWG to enter into the lock-up agreement.

On September 24, 2012, NWG served a summons and complaint on NMC, and then amended the complaint to add Newmont Canada Holdings ULC as a defendant. The complaint also named Fronteer Gold Inc. and Mark O’Dea as defendants. The complaint sought rescission of the merger between Fronteer and NewWest Gold and $750 in damages. In August 2013 the Supreme Court of New York, New York County issued an order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens. Subsequently, NWG filed a notice of appeal of the decision and then a notice of dismissal of the appeal on March 24, 2013.

On February 26, 2014, NWG filed a lawsuit in Ontario Superior Court of Justice against Fronteer Gold Inc., Newmont Mining Corporation, Newmont Canada Holdings ULC, Newmont FH B.V. and Mark O’Dea. The Ontario Complaint is based upon the same allegations contained in the New York lawsuit with claims for fraud and negligent misrepresentation. NWG seeks disgorgement of profits since the close of the NWG deal on September 24, 2007 and punitive damages.

Newmont intends to vigorously defend this matter, but cannot reasonably predict the outcome.

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

Other Commitments and Contingencies

Tax contingencies are provided for in accordance with ASC income tax guidance (see Note 8).

The Company has minimum royalty obligations on one of its producing mines in Nevada for the life of the mine. Amounts paid as a minimum royalty (where production royalties are less than the minimum obligation) in any year are recoverable in future years when the minimum royalty obligation is exceeded. Although the minimum royalty requirement may not be met in a particular year, the Company expects that over the mine life, gold production will be sufficient to meet the minimum royalty requirements. Minimum royalty payments payable are $30 in 2014, $34 in 2015 through 2018 and $323 thereafter.

As part of its ongoing business and operations, the Company and its affiliates are required to provide surety bonds, bank letters of credit and bank guarantees as financial support for various purposes, including environmental reclamation, exploration permitting, workers compensation programs and other general corporate purposes. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were $1,835 and $1,807, respectively, of outstanding letters of credit, surety bonds and bank guarantees. The surety bonds, letters of credit and bank guarantees reflect fair value as a condition of their underlying purpose and are subject to fees competitively determined in the market place. The obligations associated with these instruments are generally related to performance requirements that the Company addresses through its ongoing operations. As the specific requirements are met, the beneficiary of the associated instrument cancels and/or returns the instrument to the issuing entity. Certain of these instruments are associated with operating sites with long-lived assets and will remain outstanding until closure. Generally, bonding requirements associated with environmental regulation are becoming more restrictive. However, the Company believes it is in compliance with all applicable bonding obligations and will be able to satisfy future bonding requirements through existing or alternative means, as they arise.

Newmont is from time to time involved in various legal proceedings related to its business. Except in the above described proceedings, management does not believe that adverse decisions in any pending or threatened proceeding or that amounts that may be required to be paid by reason thereof will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

The following discussion provides information that management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Newmont Mining Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Newmont,” the “Company,” “our” and “we”). We use certain non-GAAP financial measures in our MD&A. For a detailed description of each of the non-GAAP financial measures used in this MD&A, please see the discussion under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” beginning on page 66. References to “A$” refer to Australian currency, “C$” to Canadian currency and “NZ$” to New Zealand currency.

This item should be read in conjunction with our interim unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in this quarterly report. Additionally, the following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements included in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed February 20, 2014 and revisions filed June 13, 2014 on Form 8-K.

Overview

Newmont is one of the world’s largest gold producers and is the only gold company included in the S&P 500 Index and Fortune 500. We have been included in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index-World for seven consecutive years and have adopted the World Gold Council’s Conflict-Free Gold Policy. We are also engaged in the exploration for and acquisition of gold and copper properties. We have significant operations and/or assets in the United States, Australia, Peru, Indonesia, Ghana, Mexico, Suriname and New Zealand.

Our vision is to be the most valued and respected mining company through industry leading performance.

We continue to position the business to capture benefits of economic recovery and demand growth in the current volatile commodity market environment. Our team has spent considerable time over the past eighteen months optimizing our project portfolio so that when the time is right, we can move forward with developing projects that generate value. We are focused on providing sustainable efficiency, productivity and cost improvements over the next three years and expect to deliver significant cost and cash savings improvement initiatives. One of the programs we launched in 2013 to achieve these improvements was the Full Potential program (“Full Potential”). Full Potential is designed to leverage our industry experience and discipline to accelerate the delivery of business improvement opportunities across our operations and support areas, resulting in improved levels of operating cash flow.

Second quarter and first half of 2014 highlights are included below and discussed further in Results of Consolidated Operations .

Operating highlights

•

Sales of $1,765 and $3,529 for the second quarter and first half of 2014;

•

Average realized gold and copper prices of $1,283 per ounce and $3.01 per pound, respectively, for the second quarter and $1,288 per ounce and $2.76 per pound, respectively, for the first half of 2014;

•

Consolidated gold production of 1,299,000 ounces (1,220,000 attributable ounces) for the second quarter of 2014, at Costs applicable to sales of $744 per ounce;

•

Consolidated gold production of 2,591,000 ounces (2,430,000 attributable ounces) for the first half of 2014, at Costs applicable to sales of $747 per ounce;

•

Consolidated copper production of 62 million pounds (45 million attributable pounds) for the second quarter of 2014, at Costs applicable to sales of $2.53 per pound;

•

Consolidated copper production of 139 million pounds (97 million attributable pounds) for the first half of 2014, at Costs applicable to sales of $2.62 per pound;

•

Gold operating margin (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on page 66) of $539 and $541 per ounce for the second quarter and first half of 2014, respectively.

Our global project pipeline.

Approximately 70% of our consolidated capital expenditures in 2014 will be allocated to sustaining capital. Only projects that create value, lower costs and extend mine life, such as the Turf Vent Shaft in Nevada, will be implemented, in keeping with the strategy to strengthen the portfolio. We manage our wider project portfolio to maintain flexibility to address the development risks associated with our projects including permitting, local community and government support, engineering and procurement availability, technical issues, escalating costs and other associated risks that could adversely impact the timing and costs of certain opportunities.

Our opportunities in or near the Execution phase of development comprise a part of the Company’s growth strategy and include the Turf Ventilation Shaft project in Nevada, the Conga project in Peru, and the Merian project in Suriname, as described further below.

Turf Vent Shaft, Nevada. The Turf No. 3 Vent Shaft Project is in the construction phase and is planned to achieve commercial production in late 2015. Capital costs for the project are estimated at approximately $400. The Turf No. 3 Vent Shaft project provides the ventilation required to increase production, decrease mine costs, and to unlock an additional 3 million ounces of resources in greater Leeville over the 11 year mine life.

Conga, Peru. Due to local political and community protests, construction and development activities at the Conga project were largely suspended in November 2011. The results of the Peruvian Central Government initiated Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) independent review were announced on April 20, 2012 and confirmed our initial EIA met Peruvian and International standards. The review made recommendations to provide additional water capacity and social funds, which we have largely accepted. We announced our decision to move the project forward on a “water first” approach on June 22, 2012. We anticipate spending in 2014 to be approximately $80, focusing on building access roads and permitting work around the Perol water reservoir, and gaining further social acceptance for the project. Total property, plant and mine development was $1,612 at June 30, 2014. At December 31, 2013 we reported 275,200 ktonnes of Probable Reserves, grading 0.73 gpt for 6.4 million attributable ounces of gold Reserves and 0.28% copper for 1,690 million attributable pounds of copper Reserves at Conga. Construction of Conga and the implementation of the independent EIA review recommendations will continue provided it can be done in a safe manner with risk-adjusted returns that justify future investment. Should we be unable to continue with the current development plan at Conga, we may reprioritize and reallocate capital to other alternatives, which may result in a potential accounting impairment. See Item1A, Risk Factors in Newmont’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed February 20, 2014 for a description of political risks related to the project’s development.

Merian, Suriname . On February 19, 2014 we completed the acquisition of the remaining 20% minority interest in the Merian project. The Mineral and Partnership Agreements were signed by Newmont’s indirect subsidiary, Suriname Gold Company, LLC (“Surgold”), and the Government of Suriname on November 22, 2013. The government of Suriname has the option to purchase a 25% equity ownership in Merian, which, if exercised, will bring Newmont’s ownership to 75%. The Board of Directors of Newmont recently approved full funding for the Merian project in Suriname. The project allows Newmont to pursue a new district with upside potential and the opportunity to grow and extend the operating life of the South American region. Average life of mine estimated gold production (on a 100% basis) of 300,000 to 400,000 ounces per year is expected, once Merian comes into production in late 2016. Total capital spend on the project is expected to range from $900 to $1,000 on a 100% ownership basis. At December 31, 2013, gold Reserves at Merian contained 108,250 ktonnes of Probable Reserves, grading 1.22gpt for 4.2 million ounces on a 100% ownership basis.

We continue to advance earlier stage development assets through our project pipeline in our five operating regions. The exploration, construction and operation of these earlier stage development assets may require significant funding if they go into execution. Three of our top development prospects are described further below:

Long Canyon, Nevada . The project is in the definition stage of development and we continue to develop our understanding of Long Canyon and the district. We have submitted the Plan-of-Operations to the Bureau of Land Management in support of our Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) and continue to progress the exploration program. At December 31, 2013, we reported 15,700 ktons of Probable Reserves, grading 0.065 gpt for 1.0 million attributable ounces of gold Reserves at Long Canyon. We anticipate the definition stage engineering and permitting to be completed by the end of 2014.

Subika Underground, Ghana . Subika Underground is in the confirmation stage of development as work continues to optimize the mine plan and reduce costs. The project is expected to produce approximately 200,000 ounces of gold per year and an investment decision is expected in late 2015 or 2016.

Ahafo Mill Expansion, Ghana . We continue to evaluate development alternatives for this project. Current engineering efforts are focused on reducing the scale of the project. The potential improved economics and feasibility of the project will be assessed, and the project considered for an investment decision in the second quarter of 2015.

Selected Financial and Operating Results


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013			2014		2013
Sales	$	1,765	$	2,018		$	3,529	$	4,206
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	147	$	(2,347	)	$	212	$	(1,991	)
Net income (loss)	$	145	$	(2,273	)	$	193	$	(1,917	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	$	180	$	(2,059	)	$	280	$	(1,745	)
Per common share, basic:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Newmont stockholders	$	0.37	$	(4.29	)	$	0.60	$	(3.66	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	$	0.36	$	(4.14	)	$	0.56	$	(3.51	)
Adjusted net income (loss) ⁽¹⁾	$	101	$	(90	)	$	210	$	263
Adjusted net income (loss) per share ⁽¹⁾	$	0.20	$	(0.18	)	$	0.42	$	0.53
Consolidated gold ounces (thousands)
Produced		1,299		1,284			2,591		2,567
Sold ⁽²⁾		1,269		1,331			2,547		2,583
Consolidated copper pounds (millions)
Produced		62		61			139		127
Sold		45		64			90		111
Average price received, net:
Gold (per ounce)	$	1,283	$	1,386		$	1,288	$	1,505
Copper (per pound)	$	3.01	$	2.69		$	2.76	$	2.87
Consolidated costs applicable to sales: ⁽³⁾
Gold (per ounce)	$	744	$	895		$	747	$	830
Copper (per pound)	$	2.53	$	7.59		$	2.62	$	5.35
Operating margin: ⁽¹⁾
Gold (per ounce)	$	539	$	491		$	541	$	675
Copper (per pound)	$	0.48	$	(4.90	)	$	0.14	$	(2.48	)

⁽¹⁾	See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on page 66.

⁽²⁾	Excludes development ounces.

⁽³⁾	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .

Consolidated Financial Results

Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders for the second quarter of 2014 was $180 ($0.36 per share) compared to a loss of $2,059 ($(4.14) per share) for the second quarter of 2013. Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders for the first half of 2014 was $280 ($0.56 per share) compared to a loss of $1,745 ($(3.51) per share) for the first half of 2013. Results for the second quarter of 2014 compared to the second quarter of 2013 were impacted by lower asset impairments, lower stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments, and a favorable deferred tax settlement in the current quarter. These favorable variances were partially offset by lower realized gold prices and the inability to export concentrate in Indonesia. Results for the first half of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 were impacted by lower asset impairments, lower stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments, partially offset by lower realized gold prices and the inability to export concentrate in Indonesia.

Gold Sales decreased 12% in the second quarter of 2014 due to lower realized prices and lower sales volumes. Gold Sales decreased 16% in the first half of 2014 due to lower sales volume and realized prices. The following analysis summarizes consolidated gold sales:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Consolidated gold sales:
Gross before provisional pricing	$	1,634		$	1,874		$	3,284		$	3,918
Provisional pricing mark-to-market		—			(24	)		5			(22	)

Gross after provisional pricing		1,634			1,850			3,289			3,896
Treatment and refining charges		(5	)		(5	)		(9	)		(9	)

Net	$	1,629		$	1,845		$	3,280		$	3,887

Consolidated gold ounces sold (thousands):		1,269			1,331			2,547			2,583
Average realized gold price (per ounce):
Gross before provisional pricing	$	1,287		$	1,408		$	1,290		$	1,517
Provisional pricing mark-to-market		—			(18	)		2			(9	)

Gross after provisional pricing		1,287			1,390			1,292			1,508
Treatment and refining charges		(4	)		(4	)		(4	)		(3	)

Net	$	1,283		$	1,386		$	1,288		$	1,505

The change in consolidated gold sales is due to:


	Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,
	2014 vs. 2013			2014 vs. 2013
Change in consolidated ounces sold	$	(85	)	$	(54	)
Change in average realized gold price		(131	)		(553	)

	$	(216	)	$	(607	)

Copper Sales decreased 21% in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the second quarter of 2013 due to lower copper pounds sold primarily related to the inability to export copper concentrate at Batu Hijau partially offset by higher realized prices. Copper Sales decreased 22% in the first half of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 due to lower sales volume and lower realized prices. The following analysis summarizes consolidated copper sales:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Consolidated copper sales:
Gross before provisional pricing	$	141		$	207		$	283		$	373
Provisional pricing mark-to-market		6			(16	)		(11	)		(25	)

Gross after provisional pricing		147			191			272			348
Treatment and refining charges		(11	)		(18	)		(23	)		(29	)

Net	$	136		$	173		$	249		$	319

Consolidated copper pounds sold (millions):		45			64			90			111
Average realized copper price (per pound):
Gross before provisional pricing	$	3.12		$	3.22		$	3.13		$	3.35
Provisional pricing mark-to-market		0.14			(0.25	)		(0.13	)		(0.22	)

Gross after provisional pricing		3.26			2.97			3.00			3.13
Treatment and refining charges		(0.25	)		(0.28	)		(0.24	)		(0.26	)

Net	$	3.01		$	2.69		$	2.76		$	2.87

The change in consolidated copper sales is due to:


	Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,
	2014 vs. 2013			2014 vs. 2013
Change in consolidated pounds sold	$	(57	)	$	(64	)
Change in average realized copper price		13			(12	)
Change in treatment and refining charges		7			6

	$	(37	)	$	(70	)

The following is a summary of consolidated gold and copper sales, net:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
*Gold*
North America:
Carlin	$	268	$	290	$	561	$	641
Phoenix		72		80		142		133
Twin Creeks		125		188		257		354
La Herradura		59		71		90		161

		524		629		1,050		1,289

South America:
Yanacocha		240		420		505		875
Australia/New Zealand:
Boddington		190		249		410		578
Tanami		119		83		224		181
Jundee		97		105		179		229
Waihi		52		34		85		84
Kalgoorlie		96		110		214		230

		554		581		1,112		1,302

Indonesia:
Batu Hijau		10		15		18		26
Africa:
Ahafo		156		200		297		395
Akyem		145		—		298		—

		301		200		595		395

		1,629		1,845		3,280		3,887

*Copper*
North America:
Phoenix		39		25		71		36
Australia/New Zealand:
Boddington		38		49		77		114
Indonesia:
Batu Hijau		59		99		101		169

		136		173		249		319

	$	1,765	$	2,018	$	3,529	$	4,206

Costs applicable to sales includes an 11% and 9% reduction in direct operating costs in the second quarter and first half of 2014, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2013. This reduction in direct operating costs includes the addition of Akyem as a new operating site which reached commercial production in the fourth quarter of 2013. Costs applicable to sales for gold and copper decreased in the second quarter and first half of 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013 due to the direct operating cost reduction mentioned above and lower stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments. For a complete discussion regarding variations in operations, see Results of Consolidated Operations below.

Depreciation and amortization in the second quarter and first half of 2014 decreased compared to the same period of 2013 due to lower stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments related to depreciation and amortization. We expect Depreciation and amortization to be $1,050 to $1,125 in 2014 including the impact of the stockpile and leach pad write-downs discussed above.

The following is a summary of Costs applicable to sales and Depreciation and amortization :


	Costs Applicable				Depreciation and				Costs Applicable				Depreciation and
	to Sales				Amortization				to Sales				Amortization
	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
*Gold*
North America:
Carlin	$	209	$	169	$	43	$	27	$	401	$	348	$	78	$	59
Phoenix		35		37		9		8		69		78		14		15
Twin Creeks		49		80		9		22		104		132		20		40
La Herradura		26		42		10		7		42		82		18		13

		319		328		71		64		616		640		130		127
South America:
Yanacocha		184		201		84		97		405		361		185		167
Australia/New Zealand:
Boddington		133		252		24		59		275		426		49		101
Tanami		63		64		18		17		118		139		35		33
Jundee		43		51		17		21		85		105		34		37
Waihi		19		25		7		8		38		53		12		16
Kalgoorlie		65		123		4		8		142		198		10		13

		323		515		70		113		658		921		140		200
Indonesia:
Batu Hijau		9		63		3		13		17		70		5		15
Africa:
Ahafo		65		85		17		20		126		151		33		37
Akyem		44		—		21		—		82		—		42		—

		109		85		38		20		208		151		75		37

		944		1,192		266		307		1,904		2,143		535		546

*Copper*
North America:
Phoenix		30		15		5		3		56		26		8		5
Australia/New Zealand:
Boddington		32		62		6		14		72		110		12		24
Indonesia:
Batu Hijau		54		413		17		81		111		460		30		90

		116		490		28		98		239		596		50		119
*Other*
Corporate and other		—		—		12		10		—		—		19		17

		—		—		12		10		—		—		19		17

	$	1,060	$	1,682	$	306	$	415	$	2,143	$	2,739	$	604	$	682

Exploration expense decreased $35 and $60 in the second quarter and first half of 2014, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2013 due to decreases in both brownfields and greenfields expenditures in all our regions.

We expect combined Exploration and Advanced projects, research and development expenses to be approximately $400 to $450 in 2014. Exploration expense will be focused primarily on Carlin underground, Long Canyon and within our La Herradura joint venture in North America, Yanacocha and Merian in South America, Ahafo and Subika in Africa, Waihi in New Zealand and Tanami in Australia. Advanced projects, research and development expense will be focused primarily on Conga, Merian and Verde Bio Leach in South America, La Herradura and North Exodus in North America and Subika in Africa.

General and administrative expense decreased by $6 and $17 for the second quarter and first half of 2014, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2013 due primarily to lower labor costs. We expect General and administrative expenses of $175 to $200 in 2014.

Other expense, net decreased by $26 in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the second quarter of 2013 mainly due to lower community development, regional administration, and restructuring expenses. Other expense, net decreased by $73 in the first half of 2014 compared to the first half of 2013 mainly due to lower community development, regional administration, restructuring expenses, and transaction costs related to TMAC that occurred in the first quarter of 2013.

Other income, net decreased by $47 in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the second quarter of 2013 and decreased by $27 in the first half of 2014 compared to the first half of 2013 due to a decrease in dividends related to the sale of the Canadian Oil Sands investment in the third quarter of 2013 and lower foreign currency exchange gains, partially offset by the gain on the sale of Midas in the first quarter of 2014.

Interest expense, net increased by $24 and $52 for the second quarter and first half of 2014, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2013 due to decreased capitalized interest. Capitalized interest decreased by $25 and $51 in the second quarter and first half of 2014, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2013 from capital projects being completed at Akyem and Phoenix copper leach. We continue to expect Interest expense, net to be approximately $325 to $350 in 2014.

Income and mining tax expenses during the second quarter of 2014 resulted in an estimated benefit of $53, for an effective tax rate of (58)%. Estimated income and mining tax benefit during the second quarter of 2013 was $287 for an effective tax rate of 12%. The difference in effective tax rates is due to the following: (i) a 2014 release of valuation allowance on some of the Company’s tax credits related to the settlement of an income tax audit; (ii) a larger impact in 2014 from percentage depletion, partially offset by; (iii) a 2014 increase in the rate associated with mining taxes.

During the first half of 2014, the estimated income and mining tax expense was $25, resulting in an effective tax rate of 10%. Estimated income and mining tax benefit during the first half of 2013 was $107 for an effective tax rate of 7%. The difference in effective tax rates is primarily due to the same factors above in addition to the tax impact on the sale of Midas in 2014.


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2014						2013						Variance
Income (loss) before income and mining tax and other items				$	92					$	(2,631	)

Tax at statutory rate		35	%	$	32			35	%	$	(921	)
Reconciling items:
Percentage depletion		(21	)%		(19	)		2	%		(52	)		(23	)%
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets		(81	)%		(75	)		(26	)%		723			(55	)%
Mining and other Taxes		5	%		5			(1	)%		18			6	%
Effect of foreign earnings, net of credits		3	%		3			(1	)%		20			4	%
Other		1	%		1			3	%		(75	)		(2	)%

Income and mining tax expense (benefit)		(58	)%	$	(53	)		12	%	$	(287	)		(70	)%


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014						2013						Variance
Income (loss) before income and mining tax and other items				$	235					$	(2,091	)

Tax at statutory rate		35	%	$	82			35	%	$	(732	)
Reconciling items:
Percentage depletion		(13	)%		(30	)		4	%		(93	)		(17	)%
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets		(27	)%		(62	)		(33	)%		728			6	%
Mining and other Taxes		3	%		8			(1	)%		36			4	%
Disallowed loss on Midas Sale		6	%		13						—			6	%
Effect of foreign earnings, net of credits		4	%		9			(1	)%		16			5	%
Other		2	%		5			3	%		(62	)		(1	)%

Income and mining tax expense (benefit)		10	%	$	25			7	%	$	(107	)		3	%

A valuation allowance is provided for those deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related benefits will not be realized. In determining the amount of the valuation allowance, each quarter the Company considers future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, estimated future taxable income, taxable income in prior carryback year(s), as well as feasible tax planning strategies in each jurisdiction to determine if the deferred tax assets are realizable. If it is determined we will not realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets, we will place or increase a valuation allowance. Conversely, if we determine that we will ultimately be able to realize all or a portion of the related benefits for which a valuation allowance has been provided, all or a portion of the related valuation allowance will be reduced. There are a number of risk factors that could impact the Company’s ability to realize the deferred tax assets. See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Risks and Uncertainties.

Likewise, there are a number of factors that can potentially impact the Company’s effective tax, including the geographic distribution of income, the non-recognition of tax assets, percentage depletion, changes in tax laws, and the impact of specific transactions and assessments. For a complete discussion of the factors that influence our effective tax rate, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed June 13,2014 on Form 8-K.

Due to the factors discussed above and the sensitivity of the Company’s income tax expense and effective tax rate to these factors, it is expected that the effective tax rate will fluctuate, sometimes significantly, in future periods. We expect the 2014 consolidated tax expense to be approximately 37% to 40%, assuming an average realized gold price of $1,300 per ounce.

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests increased to a net loss of $35 in the second quarter and $87 in the first half of 2014 compared to a net loss of $214 in the second quarter and $172 in the first half of 2013 as a result of increased earnings at Batu Hijau partially offset by decreased earnings at Minera Yanacocha as well as the TMAC transaction in March 2013.

Income (loss) from discontinued operations includes an increase in the Holt property royalty liability as of June 30, 2014. During the second quarter of 2014, the Company recorded a charge of $2, net of tax benefits of $1, related to a decrease in discount rates offset by a decrease in gold price. During the first half of 2014, the Company recorded a charge from discontinued operations of $19, net of tax benefit of $9, related to an increase in gold price, an increase in expected future production and a decrease in discount rates. During the second quarter of 2013, the Company recorded a benefit of $74, net of tax expense of $34, related to a decline in the gold spot price and an increase in discount rates. During the first half of 2013, the Company recorded a benefit from discontinued operations of $74, net of tax expense of $34, related to a decline in the gold spot price and an increase in discount rates. Due to the nature of the sliding scale royalty calculation, changes in expected production and the gold price have a significant impact on the fair value of the liability.

Results of Consolidated Operations


	Gold or Copper Produced				Costs Applicable to Sales ⁽¹⁾				Depreciation and Amortization				All-In Sustaining Costs ⁽³⁾
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
	(ounces in thousands)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Gold
North America		401		437	$	780	$	722	$	175	$	141	$	1,032	$	1,095
South America		190		291		984		673		454		328		1,398		949
Australia / New Zealand		455		404		748		1,206		164		265		926		1,425
Indonesia		15		13		1,071		5,299		374		1,165		1,556		5,917
Africa		238		139		468		596		161		139		688		1,035

Total/Weighted-Average		1,299		1,284	$	744	$	895	$	211	$	231	$	1,063	$	1,283

Attributable to Newmont ⁽²⁾⁽³⁾		1,220		1,167


	(pounds in millions)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)
Copper
North America		12		9	$	2.33	$	1.65	$	0.41	$	0.34	$	3.15	$	2.38
Australia/New Zealand		16		16		2.42		3.25		0.42		0.71		3.31		3.84
Indonesia		34		36		2.82		11.23		0.89		2.20		4.32		12.59

Total/Weighted Average		62		61	$	2.53	$	7.59	$	0.62	$	1.51	$	3.69	$	8.72

Attributable to Newmont		45		42


	(tonnes in thousands)
Copper
North America		5		4
Australia/New Zealand		7		7
Indonesia		16		16

Total/Weighted Average		28		27

Attributable to Newmont		20		19


	Gold or Copper Produced				Costs Applicable to Sales ⁽¹⁾				Depreciation and Amortization				All-In Sustaining Costs ⁽³⁾
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
	(ounces in thousands)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Six Months Ended June 30,
Gold
North America		807		874	$	753	$	743	$	160	$	148	$	995	$	1,065
South America		398		577		1,032		626		472		290		1,401		917
Australia/New Zealand		893		825		765		1,062		163		230		934		1,277
Indonesia		31		27		1,161		3,682		348		806		1,800		4,474
Africa		462		264		448		577		162		141		652		1,077

Total/Weighted-Average		2,591		2,567	$	747	$	830	$	210	$	211	$	1,048	$	1,205

Attributable to Newmont ⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾		2,430		2,333


	(pounds in millions)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)
Copper
North America		24		16	$	2.36	$	2.11	$	0.35	$	0.43	$	2.88	$	2.75
Australia/New Zealand		34		35		2.53		2.78		0.41		0.60		3.32		3.38
Indonesia		81		76		2.90		7.71		0.78		1.51		4.47		9.18

Total/Weighted Average		139		127	$	2.62	$	5.35	$	0.55	$	1.07	$	3.69	$	6.45

Attributable to Newmont		97		88


	(tonnes in thousands)
Copper
North America		11		7
Australia/New Zealand		15		16
Indonesia		37		35

Total/Weighted Average		63		58

Attributable to Newmont		44		40

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .

⁽²⁾	Includes 8 and 17 attributable ounces in 2014 and 2013, respectively, from our interest in La Zanja and 13 and 14 attributable ounces in 2014 and 2013, respectively, from our interest in Duketon.

⁽³⁾	All-In Sustaining Costs is a non-GAAP financial measure. See page 66 for a reconciliation.

⁽⁴⁾	Includes 23 and 32 attributable ounces in 2014 and 2013, respectively, from our interest in La Zanja and 25 and 29 attributable ounces in 2014 and 2013, respectively, from our interest in Duketon.

Second quarter 2014 compared to 2013

Consolidated gold production increased 1% due to higher production from Africa and Australia / New Zealand partially offset by lower production from Yanacocha and North America. Consolidated copper production increased 2% due to production from the Phoenix copper leach facility that reached commercial production in the fourth quarter of 2013 partially offset by lower production from Batu Hijau related to the export issue.

Costs applicable to sales per consolidated gold ounce sold decreased 17% due to the continued progress in reducing direct operating costs as mentioned above as well as lower stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments and low cost production from Akyem partially offset by higher mining costs on a unit basis at Yanacocha. Costs applicable to sales per consolidated copper pound decreased 67% due to lower stockpile inventory adjustments as compared to the prior year quarter.

Depreciation and amortization decreased 9% per consolidated gold ounce sold due to lower stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments partially offset by higher asset retirement costs at Yanacocha. Depreciation and amortization decreased 59% per consolidated copper pound sold due to lower stockpile inventory adjustments than the prior year quarter.

First half 2014 compared to 2013

Consolidated gold production increased 1% from higher production from Africa and Australia / New Zealand partially offset by lower production from Yanacocha and North America. Consolidated copper production increased 9% due primarily to production from the Phoenix copper leach facility that reached commercial production in the fourth quarter of 2013.

Costs applicable to sales per consolidated gold ounce sold decreased 10% due to the continued progress in reducing direct operating costs, lower stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments and low cost production from Akyem partially offset by lower ounces produced at Yanacocha. Costs applicable to sales per consolidated copper pound sold decreased 51% due to lower stockpile inventory adjustments.

Depreciation and amortization per consolidated gold ounce sold was essentially in line with prior year. Depreciation and amortization decreased 49% per consolidated copper pound sold due to lower stockpile inventory adjustments.

We now expect attributable gold production of approximately 4.7 to 5.0 million ounces at consolidated Costs applicable to sales per ounce of $720 to $760. We now expect attributable copper production of approximately 90,000 to 100,000 tonnes at consolidated Costs applicable to sales per pound of $2.80 to $3.10 in 2014.

North America Operations


	Gold Ounces Produced				Costs Applicable to Sales ⁽¹⁾				Depreciation and Amortization				All-In Sustaining Costs ⁽⁴⁾
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
	(in thousands)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Carlin		209		203	$	1,003	$	806	$	208	$	128	$	1,220	$	1,090
Phoenix		52		64		601		579		156		127		702		766
Twin Creeks		94		116		507		628		95		176		844		776
La Herradura ⁽²⁾		46		54		568		784		214		123		804		1,815

Total/Weighted-Average		401		437	$	780	$	722	$	175	$	141	$	1,032	$	1,095

Attributable to Newmont		401		437


	(pounds in millions)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)
Phoenix		12		9	$	2.33	$	1.65	$	0.41	$	0.34	$	3.15	$	2.38


	(tonnes in thousands)
Phoenix		5		4


	Gold Ounces Produced ⁽¹⁾				Costs Applicable to Sales ⁽¹⁾				Depreciation and Amortization				All-In Sustaining Costs ⁽⁴⁾
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
	(in thousands)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Six Months Ended June 30,
Carlin		438		434	$	919	$	806	$	179	$	135	$	1,082	$	1,058
Phoenix		105		116		613		796		127		155		759		990
Twin Creeks		190		215		522		592		101		183		859		783
La Herradura ⁽²⁾⁽³⁾		74		109		603		750		260		119		899		1,404

Total/Weighted-Average		807		874	$	753	$	743	$	160	$	148	$	995	$	1,065

Attributable to Newmont		807		874


	(pounds in millions)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)
Phoenix		24		16	$	2.36	$	2.11	$	0.35	$	0.43	$	2.88	$	2.75


	(tonnes in thousands)
Phoenix		11		7

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .

⁽²⁾	Our proportionate 44% share.

⁽³⁾	Includes 4,000 development ounces from the newly constructed mill at La Herradura.

⁽⁴⁾	All-In Sustaining Costs is a non-GAAP financial measure. See page 66 for a reconciliation.

Second quarter 2014 compared to 2013

Carlin, USA. Gold ounces produced increased 3% due primarily to higher tons and grade at Mill 6 as well as higher recoveries at Emigrant. Mill 6 throughput was positively impacted by the Full Potential project. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 24% due to planned stripping at Gold Quarry and the Carlin North Area partially offset by lower direct operating costs. Lower direct operating costs were positively impacted by Full Potential projects that lowered contract haulage costs, that optimized the haul road distances and reduced leach pad consumables. Depreciation and amortization per ounce increased 63% due to costs related to the ongoing stripping campaign.

Phoenix, USA. Gold ounces produced decreased 19% due to lower mill throughput and lower grade. Copper pounds produced increased 33% due to production from the Phoenix Copper Leach facility which was completed in the fourth quarter of 2013. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 4% due to lower ounces sold. Costs applicable to sales per pound increased 41% from higher allocation of costs to copper. Depreciation and amortization increased 23% per ounce and increased 21% per pound due to lower gold production and the amortization of the copper leach facility.

Twin Creeks, USA. Gold ounces produced decreased 19% due to lower production following the sale of Midas as well as lower tons and grade at the Twin Creeks Autoclave. Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased 19% due to a lower strip ratio, and the sale of Midas. Depreciation and amortization per ounce decreased 46% due to the Midas sale.

La Herradura, Mexico. Gold production decreased 15% due to the impact of the suspension of the explosives permit and reduced mining area. Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased 28% due to higher leach placement with the ramp up of production after receiving the explosives permit partially offset by lower ounces sold. Depreciation and amortization per ounce increased 74% due to the new mill and additional mining equipment.

First half 2014 compared to 2013

Carlin, USA. Gold ounces produced were slightly higher than prior year. Mill 6 throughput was positively impacted by the Full Potential project. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 14% due to planned stripping at Gold Quarry and the Carlin North Area partially offset by lower direct operating costs. Lower direct operating was positively impacted by Full Potential projects that lowered contract haulage costs, that optimized the haul road distances and reduced leach pad consumables. Depreciation and amortization per ounce increased 33% due to costs related to the ongoing stripping campaign.

Phoenix, USA. Gold ounces produced decreased 9% due primarily to lower mill throughput. Copper pounds produced increased 50% due to production from the Phoenix Copper Leach facility which was completed in the fourth quarter of 2013. Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased 23% due to lower operating costs and higher by-product credits. Costs applicable to sales per pound increased 12% from higher allocation of costs to copper partially offset by higher pounds sold as result of the new copper leach facility. Depreciation and amortization per ounce decreased 18% due to higher ounces sold. Depreciation and amortization per pound decreased 19% due to higher copper pounds sold as a result of the new production from copper leach.

Twin Creeks, USA. Gold ounces produced decreased 12% due to lower production following the sale of Midas. Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased 12% due to a lower strip ratio and the sale of Midas. Depreciation and amortization per ounce decreased 45% due to the Midas sale.

La Herradura, Mexico. Gold production decreased 32% due to the impact of the suspension of the explosives permit and reduced mining area. Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased 20% due to higher leach placement with the ramp up of production after receiving the explosives permit partially offset by lower ounces sold. Depreciation and amortization per ounce increased 118% due to the new mill and additional mining equipment.

We continue to expect gold production in North America of approximately 1.6 to 1.7 million ounces at revised Costs applicable to sales per ounce of $750 to $810 in 2014. We continue to expect copper production in North America of approximately 15,000 to 25,000 tonnes at revised Costs applicable to sales per pound of $2.10 to $2.30 in 2014.

South America Operations


	Gold Ounces Produced				Costs Applicable to Sales ⁽¹⁾				Depreciation and Amortization				All-In Sustaining Costs ⁽²⁾
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
	(in thousands)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Yanacocha		190		291	$	984	$	673	$	454	$	328	$	1,344	$	943

Attributable to Newmont:
Yanacocha (51.35%)		98		150
La Zanja (46.94%)		8		17

		106		167


	Gold Ounces Produced				Costs Applicable to Sales ⁽¹⁾				Depreciation and Amortization				All-In Sustaining Costs ⁽²⁾
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
	(in thousands)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Six Months Ended June 30,
Yanacocha		398		577	$	1,032	$	626	$	472	$	290	$	1,355	$	908

Attributable to Newmont:
Yanacocha (51.35%)		205		296
La Zanja (46.94%)		23		32

		228		328

(1)	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .

(2)	All-In Sustaining Costs is a non-GAAP financial measure. See page 66 for a reconciliation.

Second quarter 2014 compared to 2013

Yanacocha, Peru. Gold production decreased 35% due primarily to processing lower grade stockpiled ore through the mill as planned. This resulted from declines in higher grade mine production at Tapado Oeste and Chaquicocha. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 46% due to higher direct mining costs on a unit basis related to the decline in production in the current year compared to prior year. Depreciation and amortization per ounce increased 38% due to higher asset retirement costs, the portion of the stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments related to depreciation and amortization, and lower ounces sold.

First half 2014 compared to 2013

Yanacocha, Peru. Gold production decreased 31% due primarily to processing lower grade stockpiled ore through the mill as planned. This resulted from declines in higher grade mine production at Tapado Oeste and Chaquicocha. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 65% due to higher direct mining costs on a unit basis as well as the unfavorable impact of fixed costs spread over lower ounces sold. Depreciation and amortization per ounce increased 63% due to higher asset retirement costs, the portion of the stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments related to depreciation and amortization, and lower ounces sold.

We continue to expect attributable gold production in South America of approximately 510,000 to 560,000 ounces at revised consolidated Costs applicable to sales per ounce of $660 to $720 in 2014.

Australia/New Zealand

Operations


	Gold or Copper Produced				Costs Applicable to Sales ⁽¹⁾				Depreciation and Amortization				All-In Sustaining Costs ⁽³⁾
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
	(ounces in thousands)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Gold
Boddington		168		171	$	897	$	1,307	$	165	$	308	$	1,061	$	1,440
Tanami		95		62		680		1,064		195		278		924		1,467
Jundee		74		73		569		714		226		289		724		959
Waihi		41		25		468		995		174		316		537		1,280
KCGM		77		73		868		1,601		57		108		960		1,662

Total/Weighted-Average		455		404	$	748	$	1,206	$	164	$	265	$	926	$	1,425

Attributable to Newmont ⁽²⁾		468		418


	(pounds in millions)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)
Copper
Boddington		16		16	$	2.42	$	3.25	$	0.42	$	0.71	$	3.31	$	3.84


	(tonnes in thousands)
Boddington		7		7


	Gold or Copper Produced				Costs Applicable to Sales ⁽¹⁾				Depreciation and Amortization				All-In Sustaining Costs ⁽³⁾
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
	(ounces in thousands)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Six Months Ended June 30,
Gold
Boddington		342		347	$	873	$	1,086	$	157	$	258	$	1,013	$	1,214
Tanami		179		122		680		1,156		202		272		942		1,562
Jundee		138		150		614		712		244		246		777		966
Waihi		67		55		577		954		182		282		636		1,164
KCGM		167		151		852		1,309		59		89		916		1,377

Total/Weighted-Average		893		825	$	765	$	1,062	$	163	$	230	$	934	$	1,277

Attributable to Newmont ⁽²⁾		918		854


	(pounds in millions)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)
Copper
Boddington		34		35	$	2.53	$	2.78	$	0.41	$	0.60	$	3.32	$	3.38


	(tonnes in thousands)
Boddington		15		16

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation.

⁽²⁾	Includes 13,000 and 14,000 attributable ounces in the second quarter 2014 and 2013, respectively, and 25,000 and 29,000 attributable ounces in the first half of 2014 and 2013, respectively, from our interest in Duketon.

⁽³⁾	All-In Sustaining Costs is a non-GAAP financial measure. See page 66 for a reconciliation.

Second quarter 2014 compared to 2013

Boddington, Australia. Gold production decreased 2% due to lower ore grade milled as a result of lower ore grade mined. This was mostly offset by higher throughput as the result of an increase in mill utilization due to the sustainable process improvements implemented with the Full Potential project. Copper production was essentially in line with the prior year quarter due to higher throughput partially offset by lower ore grade milled. Costs applicable to sales decreased 31% per ounce and decreased 26% per pound due to lower stockpile inventory adjustments compared to prior year, lower mill maintenance costs and lower mining costs on a unit basis as a result of higher tons mined. These were achieved through improved shovel availability, a change in the mine sequence, and an improved strip ratio. Depreciation and amortization decreased 46% per ounce and 41% per pound due to the asset impairment during the second quarter of 2013, and the impact of the higher stockpile inventory adjustments in the prior year quarter.

Tanami, Australia. Gold ounces produced increased 53% due to higher grades from the Auron ore body coupled with improved mining rates. These were primarily due to higher truck utilization and stope availability leading to higher tons mined and higher mill throughput. Costs applicable to sales decreased 36% per ounce due to higher production coupled with lower underground mining costs on a unit basis as a result of higher tons mined and lower operating development costs. Depreciation and amortization decreased 30% per ounce due to higher production.

Jundee, Australia. Gold ounces produced increased 1% as a result of higher throughput and ore grade milled, partially offset by a build-up of in-circuit inventory. Costs applicable to sales decreased 20% per ounce due to lower underground mining costs and higher production. Depreciation and amortization decreased 22% per ounce due to a lower amortization charge as a result of an increase in reserve base at January 1, 2014.

Waihi, New Zealand. Gold ounces produced increased 64% due to higher throughput as a result of higher ore tons mined. Costs applicable to sales decreased 53% per ounce due to higher production and lower operating costs related to the stripping campaign in the prior year period. Depreciation and amortization decreased 45% per ounce due to higher production.

Kalgoorlie, Australia. Gold ounces produced increased 5% primarily due to a combination of higher ore grade milled, recovery and throughput and higher concentrate production, partially offset by a build-up of gold in-circuit inventory. Costs applicable to sales decreased 46% per ounce and Depreciation and amortization decreased 47% per ounce due to lower direct operating costs, higher production, and the impact of the inventory adjustment in the prior year quarter.

First half 2014 compared to 2013

Boddington, Australia. Gold production decreased 1% and copper production decreased 3% due to lower ore grade milled as a result of lower ore grade mined. This was mostly offset by higher throughput as the result of an increase in mill utilization due to the sustainable process improvements implemented with the Full Potential project. Costs applicable to sales decreased 20% per ounce and 9% per pound due to lower stockpile inventory adjustments compared to prior year, lower mill maintenance costs, and lower mining costs on a unit basis as a result of higher tons mined. These were achieved through improved shovel availability, a change in the mine sequence, and an improved strip ratio. Depreciation and amortization decreased 39% per ounce and 32% per pound due to the impact of the prior year asset impairment.

Tanami, Australia. Gold ounces produced increased 47% due to higher grades from the Auron ore body coupled with improved mining rates. These were primarily due to higher truck utilization and stope availability leading to higher tons mined and higher mill throughput. Costs applicable to sales decreased 41% per ounce due to higher production coupled with lower underground mining costs on a unit basis as a result of higher tons mined and lower operating development costs and favorable foreign exchange rates. Depreciation and amortization decreased 26% per ounce due to higher production.

Jundee, Australia. Gold ounces produced decreased 8% mainly as a result of lower ore grade milled, partially offset by higher throughput. Costs applicable to sales decreased 14% per ounce due to lower underground mining costs and favorable foreign exchange rates partially offset by lower production. Depreciation and amortization was essentially in line with prior year.

Waihi, New Zealand. Gold ounces produced increased 22% due to higher mill throughput as a result of higher ore tons mined partially offset by lower ore grade milled and a build-up of in-circuit inventory. Costs applicable to sales decreased 40% per ounce due to higher production and lower mining and milling costs on a unit basis related to higher production and the stripping campaign in the prior year period. Depreciation and amortization decreased 35% per ounce due to higher production.

Kalgoorlie, Australia. Gold ounces produced increased 11% primarily due to a combination of higher ore grade milled, throughput and recovery and higher concentrate production, partially offset by build-up of gold in-circuit inventory. Costs applicable to sales decreased 35% per ounce and Depreciation and amortization decreased 34% per ounce due to lower open pit mining and processing direct operating costs, higher production, and the impact of the inventory adjustment in the prior year.

We now expect attributable gold production for Australia/New Zealand of approximately 1.6 to 1.7 million ounces at revised consolidated Costs applicable to sales per ounce of $805 to $880 in 2014. We continue to expect our attributable copper production to be 25,000 to 35,000 tonnes at consolidated Costs applicable to sales per pound of $2.50 to $2.80 in 2014.

Indonesia Operations


	Gold or Copper Produced				Costs Applicable to Sales ⁽¹⁾				Depreciation and Amortization				All-In Sustaining Costs ⁽³⁾
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
	(ounces in thousands)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Gold
Batu Hijau		15		13	$	1,071	$	5,299	$	374	$	1,165	$	1,444	$	5,917

Attributable to Newmont ⁽²⁾		7		6


	(pounds in millions)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)
Copper
Batu Hijau		34		36	$	2.82	$	11.23	$	0.89	$	2.20	$	4.32	$	12.59

Attributable to Newmont		17		17


	(tonnes in thousands)
Batu Hijau		16		16

Attributable to Newmont		8		8


	Gold or Copper Produced				Costs Applicable to Sales ⁽¹⁾				Depreciation and Amortization				All-In Sustaining Costs ⁽³⁾
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
	(ounces in thousands)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Six Months Ended June 30,
Gold
Batu Hijau		31		27	$	1,161	$	3,682	$	348	$	806	$	1,733	$	4,474

Attributable to Newmont ⁽²⁾		15		13


	(pounds in millions)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)				($ per pound)
Copper
Batu Hijau		81		76	$	2.90	$	7.71	$	0.78	$	1.51	$	4.47	$	9.18

Attributable to Newmont		39		37


	(tonnes in thousands)
Batu Hijau		37		35

Attributable to Newmont		18		17

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation.

⁽²⁾	Our 48.5% economic interest.

⁽³⁾	All-In Sustaining Costs is a non-GAAP financial measure. See page 66 for a reconciliation.

Second quarter 2014 compared to 2013

Batu Hijau, Indonesia. Gold production increased 15% due to higher grade and higher metal recovery partially offset by lower throughput as a result of the export issue. Copper production decreased 6% due to lower throughput as a result of the export issue partially offset by higher ore grade milled and higher recovery. Costs applicable to sales and Depreciation and amortization include $16 and $11, respectively, of abnormal costs related to the suspended operation. Costs applicable to sales decreased 80% per ounce and decreased 75% per pound due to lower inventory adjustments compared to prior year quarter. Depreciation and amortization decreased 68% per ounce and decreased 60% per pound due to lower total depreciation and amortization as a result of the prior year inventory adjustments.

First half 2014 compared to 2013

Batu Hijau, Indonesia. Gold production increased 15% and copper production increased 7% due to higher ore grade milled and higher recovery partially offset by lower throughput as a result of the export issue. Costs applicable to sales and Depreciation and amortization include $16 and $11, respectively, of abnormal costs related to the suspended operation. Costs applicable to sales decreased 68% per ounce and 62% per pound due to mining higher grade material and the stockpile inventory adjustment in the prior year. Depreciation and amortization decreased 57% per ounce and 48% per pound due to the favorable impact of the prior year stockpile inventory adjustment related to depreciation and amortization partially offset by lower ounces and pound sold.

On June 27, 2014, PTNNT and its majority shareholder Nusa Tenggara Partnership B.V. (“NTPBV,” a Dutch entity) submitted a request for arbitration to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) against the Government of Indonesia seeking relief from application of recent Indonesian export regulations. The recent export regulations impose new export conditions, an export duty and a January 2017 ban on the export of copper concentrate, all of which violate the Contract of Work signed by the Government of Indonesia and PTNNT and the bilateral investment treaty between Indonesia and the Netherlands. PTNNT and NTPBV intend to request provisional measures of the ICSID tribunal seeking to allow PTNNT to resume exporting copper concentrate under the existing terms of the Contract of Work during the pendency of the arbitration. PTNNT and NTPBV intend to vigorously pursue this action, but cannot reasonably predict the outcome.

Due to the export issues, using the conservative assumption of no additional production in 2014, we now expect attributable gold production for Indonesia of approximately 15,000 to 20,000 ounces at consolidated Costs applicable to sales per ounce of $1,435 to $1,570. We now expect attributable copper production of approximately 15,000 to 20,000 tonnes at consolidated Costs applicable to sales per pound of $3.50 to $3.80 in 2014.

Africa Operations


	Gold Ounces Produced				Costs Applicable to Sales ⁽¹⁾				Depreciation and Amortization				All-In Sustaining Costs ⁽²⁾
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
	(in thousands)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Ahafo		125		139	$	534	$	596	$	134	$	139	$	893	$	965
Akyem		113		—		396		—		190		—		416		—

Total / Weighted Average		238		139	$	468	$	596	$	161	$	139	$	688	$	1,035

Attributable to Newmont		238		139


	Gold Ounces Produced				Costs Applicable to Sales ⁽¹⁾				Depreciation and Amortization				All-In Sustaining Costs ⁽²⁾
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
	(in thousands)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Six Months Ended June 30,
Ahafo		230		264	$	544	$	577	$	141	$	141	$	879	$	992
Akyem		232		—		353		—		182		—		388		—

Total / Weighted Average		462		264	$	448	$	577	$	162	$	141	$	652	$	1,077

Attributable to Newmont		462		264

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation.

⁽²⁾	All-In Sustaining Costs is a non-GAAP financial measure. See page 66 for a reconciliation.

Second quarter 2014 compared to 2013

Ahafo, Ghana. Gold production decreased 10% due to lower mill throughput as a result of lower mill availability and lower ore grade processed. Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased 10% due to lower labor costs, a decrease in mining rates to synchronize with mill throughput, and operating efficiencies from the Full Potential project. Full Potential efficiencies include lower mill consumables and improved tire life. Depreciation and amortization per ounce decreased 4% due to a build-up of stockpile inventory.

Akyem, Ghana. Gold ounces produced of 113,000, Costs applicable to sales per ounce of $396, and Depreciation and amortization per ounce of $190 are due to the commencement of commercial production in the fourth quarter of 2013.

First half 2014 compared to 2013

Ahafo, Ghana. Gold production decreased 13% due to lower mill grade and lower mill throughput. Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased 6% due to lower labor costs, a decrease in mining rates to synchronize with mill throughput and operating efficiencies from the Full Potential project. Full Potential efficiencies include lower mill consumables and improved tire life.

Akyem, Ghana. Gold ounces produced of 232,000, Costs applicable to sales per ounce of $353, and Depreciation and amortization per ounce of $182 are due to the commencement of commercial production in the fourth quarter of 2013.

We now expect gold production in Africa of approximately 855,000 to 920,000 ounces at Costs applicable to sales per ounce of $495 and $540 in 2014.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

Our foreign operations sell their gold and copper production based on U.S. dollar metal prices. Approximately 50% and 51% of Costs applicable to sales for our foreign operations were paid in currencies other than the U.S. dollar during the second quarter of 2014 and 2013, respectively. Approximately 47% and 50% of Costs applicable to sales for our foreign operations were paid in currencies other than the U.S. dollar during the first half of 2014 and 2013, respectively. Variations in the local currency exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar at our foreign mining operations decreased Costs applicable to sales $25 per ounce and $14 per ounce, net of hedging gains, during the second quarter and first half of 2014, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Provided from Operating Activities

Net cash provided from continuing operations was $561 in the first half of 2014, a decrease of $171 from the first half of 2013, primarily due to lower average realized gold price offset by a decrease in direct operating costs.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities decreased to $428 during the first half of 2014 compared to $1,105 during the same period of 2013, respectively. Additions to property, plant and mine development were as follows:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013
North America:
Carlin	$	102	$	119
Phoenix		16		68
Twin Creeks		60		43
La Herradura		14		64
Other North America		6		13

		198		307

South America:
Yanacocha		35		89
Other South America		15		161

		50		250

Australia/New Zealand:
Boddington		46		54
Tanami		38		44
Jundee		15		23
Waihi		5		8
Kalgoorlie		5		5
Other Australia/New Zealand		4		3

		113		137

Indonesia:
Batu Hijau		31		56

		31		56

Africa:
Ahafo		60		117
Akyem		—		154

		60		271
Corporate and Other		12		48

Accrual basis		464		1,069
Decrease (increase) in accrued capital expenditures		25		51

Cash basis	$	489	$	1,120

Capital expenditures in North America during the first half of 2014 primarily related to the development of the Turf Vent Shaft project, capitalized drilling and engineering at Long Canyon, surface and underground mine development and capitalized exploration drilling in both Nevada and Mexico, infrastructure improvements in Nevada and completion of a mill in Mexico. Capital expenditures in South America were primarily related to the Conga project, surface mine development and capitalized equipment component purchases. The majority of capital expenditures in Australia and New Zealand were for underground mine development, tailings facility construction, mining equipment and equipment component purchases and infrastructure improvements. Capital expenditures in Indonesia were primarily for equipment and equipment component purchases. Capital expenditures in Africa were primarily related to tailings facility construction and equipment and equipment component purchases. Capital expenditures in Corporate were primarily related to the Merian project engineering and reserve conversion drilling and Corporate software improvements. We now expect 2014 consolidated capital expenditures to be $1,400 to $1,485.

Capital expenditures in North America during the first half of 2013 were primarily related to the construction of the Phoenix Copper Leach project, the development of the Turf Vent Shaft project, surface and underground mine development and infrastructure improvements in Nevada, as well as mill expansion capital in Mexico. Capital expenditures in South America were primarily related to the Conga project, surface mine and leach pad development and equipment purchases. The majority of capital expenditures in Australia and New Zealand were for underground mine development, tailings facility construction, mining equipment purchases and infrastructure improvements. Capital expenditures in Indonesia were primarily for equipment and equipment component purchases. Capital expenditures in Africa were primarily related to Akyem development and the Subika expansion project, equipment purchases and surface mine development at Ahafo. Capital expenditures in Corporate were primarily related to the Merian project.

Acquisitions, net . During the first half of 2014 we purchased the remaining 20% noncontrolling interest in the Merian project. During the first half of 2013 we paid $13 in contingent payments in accordance with the 2009 Boddington acquisition agreement.

Sale of marketable securities. During the first half of 2014 we received $25 primarily from the sale of Paladin securities.

Purchases of marketable securities. During the first half of 2014 and 2013 we purchased $1 and $1, respectively, of marketable equity securities.

Proceeds from sale of other assets. During the first half of 2014, we received $76, of which, $57 was from the Midas sale and $19 primarily from the sale of equipment at Conga. During the first half of 2013 we received $49 primarily from the sale of equipment at Conga.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided from (used in) financing activities was $(27) and $87 during the first half of 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Proceeds from and repayment of debt. During the first half of 2014, we received net proceeds from debt of $18 from our other short-term debt and paid $5 in debt for Africa. During the first half of 2013, we received net proceeds from debt of $987 from the PTNNT revolving credit facility. Proceeds from the issuance of debt were partially offset by payments of $534 on the revolving credit facility. At June 30, 2014, $167 of the $3,000 Corporate revolving credit facility were used to secure the issuance of letters of credit, primarily supporting reclamation obligations (see “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” below).

Scheduled minimum debt repayments are $51 for the remainder of 2014, $168 in 2015, $221 in 2016, $771 in 2017, $1 in 2018 and $5,680 thereafter. We expect to be able to fund debt maturities and capital expenditures from Net cash provided by operating activities , short-term investments, existing cash balances and available credit facilities.

At June 30, 2014 and 2013, Newmont Mining Corporation was in compliance with all required debt covenants and other restrictions related to material debt agreements.

Proceeds from stock issuance, net. We received proceeds of $2 during the first half of 2013, from the issuance of common stock, primarily related to employee stock sales and option exercises.

Sale of noncontrolling interests. We received $68 and $32 in proceeds, net of transaction costs, during the first half of 2014 and 2013, respectively, related to TMAC’s private placement to raise funds.

Acquisition of noncontrolling interests . In the first half of 2014 and 2013, we advanced certain funds to PTPI, an unrelated noncontrolling shareholder of PTNNT, in accordance with a loan agreement. Our economic interest in PTNNT did not change as a result of these transactions.

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests . We paid dividends of $4 and $2 to noncontrolling interests in the first half of 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Dividends paid to common stockholders. We declared regular quarterly dividends totaling $0.175 and $0.775 per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Additionally, Newmont Mining Corporation of Canada Limited, a subsidiary of the Company, declared regular quarterly dividends on its exchangeable shares totaling C$0.7914 through June 30, 2013. We paid dividends of $89 and $385 to common stockholders in the first half of 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Discontinued Operations

Net operating cash used in discontinued operations was $6 and $11 in the first half of 2014 and 2013, respectively, related to payments on the Holt property royalty.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have the following off-balance sheet arrangements: operating leases (as discussed in Note 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on June 13, 2014 on Form 8-K) and $1,835 of outstanding letters of credit, surety bonds and bank guarantees (see Note 26 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

We also have sales agreements to sell copper and gold concentrates at market prices as follows (in thousands of tons):


	2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		Thereafter
Batu Hijau		269		197		—		—		—		—
Boddington		121		198		204		209		165		66
Phoenix		48		41		71		—		—		—

		438		436		275		209		165		66

Other Liquidity Matters

At June 30, 2014, the Company had $1,653 in cash and cash equivalents, of which $1,081 was held in foreign subsidiaries and is primarily held in U.S. dollar denominated accounts with the remainder in foreign currencies readily convertible to U.S. dollars. At June 30, 2014, $382 of the consolidated cash and cash equivalents was attributable to noncontrolling interests primarily related to our Indonesian and Peruvian operations which is being held to fund those operations and development projects. At June 30, 2014, $971 in consolidated cash and cash equivalents ($623 attributable to Newmont) was held at certain foreign subsidiaries that, if repatriated, may be subject to withholding taxes. The repatriation of this cash and the applicable withholding taxes would generate foreign tax credits in the U.S. As a result, we expect that there would be no additional tax burden upon repatriation after considering the cash cost associated with the withholding taxes.

We believe that our liquidity and capital resources from U.S. operations and flow-through foreign subsidiaries are adequate to fund our U.S. operations and corporate activities.

Environmental

Our mining and exploration activities are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. We have made, and expect to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the full amount of such future expenditures. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $1,457 and $1,432, respectively, were accrued for reclamation costs relating to currently or recently producing mineral properties.

In addition, we are involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former mining activities. Based upon our best estimate of our liability for these matters, $165 and $179 were accrued for such obligations at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. We spent $15 and $12 during the first half of 2014 and 2013, respectively, for environmental obligations related to the former, primarily historic, mining activities and have classified $30 as a current liability at June 30, 2014.

During the first half of 2014 and 2013, capital expenditures were approximately $43 and $40, respectively, to comply with environmental regulations. Ongoing costs to comply with environmental regulations have not been a significant component of operating costs.

For more information on the Company’s reclamation and remediation liabilities, see Notes 4 and 26 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounting Developments

For a discussion of Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements, see Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Non-GAAP financial measures are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standard meaning prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Adjusted net income (loss)

Management of the Company uses Adjusted net income (loss) to evaluate the Company’s operating performance, and for planning and forecasting future business operations. The Company believes the use of Adjusted net income (loss) allows investors and analysts to compare results of the continuing operations of the Company and its direct and indirect subsidiaries relating to the production and sale of minerals to similar operating results of other mining companies, by excluding exceptional or unusual items. Management’s determination of the components of Adjusted net income (loss) are evaluated periodically and based, in part, on a review of non-GAAP financial measures used by mining industry analysts. Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders is reconciled to Adjusted net income (loss) as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013

Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	$	180		$	(2,059	)	$	280		$	(1,745	)
Loss (income) from discontinued operations		2			(74	)		19			(74	)
Impairments and loss provisions		5			1,497			7			1,501
Tax valuation allowance		(98	)		535			(98	)		535
Restructuring and other		4			11			7			16
Asset sales		(1	)		—			(14	)		—
Abnormal production costs at Batu Hijau		9			—			9			—
TMAC transaction costs		—			—			—			30

Adjusted net income (loss)	$	101		$	(90	)	$	210		$	263

Adjusted net income (loss) per share, basic	$	0.20		$	(0.18	)	$	0.42		$	0.53
Adjusted net income (loss) per share, diluted	$	0.20		$	(0.18	)	$	0.42		$	0.53

Costs applicable to sales per ounce/pound

Costs applicable to sales per ounce/pound are non-GAAP financial measures. These measures are calculated by dividing the costs applicable to sales of gold and copper by gold ounces or copper pounds sold, respectively. These measures are calculated on a consistent basis for the periods presented on a consolidated basis. Costs applicable to sales per ounce/pound statistics are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP. Other companies may calculate these measures differently.

The following tables reconcile these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

Costs applicable to sales per ounce


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013

Costs applicable to sales ⁽¹⁾	$	944	$	1,192	$	1,904	$	2,143
Gold sold (thousand ounces)		1,269		1,331		2,547		2,583
Costs applicable to sales per ounce	$	744	$	895	$	747	$	830

⁽¹⁾	Includes by-product credits of $20 and $38 in the second quarter and first half of 2014, respectively and $22 and $49 in the second quarter and first half of 2013, respectively.

Costs applicable to sales per pound


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013

Costs applicable to sales ⁽¹⁾	$	116	$	490	$	239	$	596
Copper sold (million pounds)		45		64		90		111
Costs applicable to sales per pound	$	2.53	$	7.59	$	2.62	$	5.35

⁽¹⁾	Includes by-product credits of $4 and $9 in the second quarter and first half of 2014, respectively and $2 and $5 in the second quarter and first half of 2013, respectively.

All-In Sustaining Costs

Newmont has worked to develop a metric that expands on GAAP measures such as cost of goods sold and non-GAAP measures to provide visibility into the economics of our mining operations related to expenditures, operating performance and the ability to generate cash flow from operations.

Current GAAP-measures used in the mining industry, such as cost of goods sold, do not capture all of the expenditures incurred to discover, develop, and sustain gold production. Therefore, we believe that All-in sustaining costs are non-GAAP measures that provide additional information to management, investors, and analysts that aid in the understanding of the economics of our operations and performance compared to other producers and in the investor’s visibility by better defining the total costs associated with production.

All-in sustaining cost (“AISC”) amounts are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP. Other companies may calculate these measures differently as a result of differences in the underlying accounting principles, policies applied and in accounting frameworks such as in International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), or by reflecting the benefit from selling non-gold metals as a reduction to AISC. Differences may also arise related to definitional differences of sustaining versus development capital activities based upon each company’s internal policies.

The following disclosure provides information regarding the adjustments made in determining the All-in sustaining costs measure:

Cost Applicable to Sales —Includes all direct and indirect costs related to current production incurred to execute the current mine plan. Costs Applicable to Sales (“CAS”) includes by-product credits from certain metals obtained during the process of extracting and processing the primary ore-body. CAS is accounted for on an accrual basis and excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation , which is consistent with our presentation of CAS on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. In determining All-in sustaining costs, only the CAS associated with producing and selling an ounce of gold or a pound of copper is included in the measure. Therefore, the amount of CAS included in AISC is derived from the CAS presented in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The allocation of CAS between gold and copper at the Phoenix, Boddington, and Batu Hijau mines is based upon the relative production percentage of copper and gold sold during the period.

Remediation Costs —Includes accretion expense related to asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) and the amortization of the related Asset Retirement Cost (“ARC”) for the Company’s operating properties recorded as an ARC asset. Accretion related to ARO and the amortization of the ARC assets for reclamation and remediation do not reflect annual cash outflows but are calculated in accordance with GAAP. The accretion and amortization reflect the periodic costs of reclamation and remediation associated with current gold production and are therefore included in the measure. The allocation of these costs to gold and copper is determined using the same allocation used in the allocation of CAS between gold and copper at the Phoenix, Boddington, and Batu Hijau mines.

Advanced Projects and Exploration —Includes incurred expenses related to projects that are designed to increase or enhance current gold production and gold exploration. We note that as current resources are depleted, exploration and advance projects are necessary for us to replace the depleting reserves or enhance the recovery and processing of the current reserves. As this relates to sustaining our gold production, and is considered a continuing cost of a mining company, these costs are included in the AISC measure. These costs are derived from the Advanced projects, research and development and Exploration amounts presented in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The allocation of these costs to gold and copper is determined using the same allocation used in the allocation of CAS between gold and copper at the Phoenix, Boddington, and Batu Hijau mines.

General and Administrative —Includes cost related to administrative tasks not directly related to current gold production, but rather related to support our corporate structure and fulfilling our obligations to operate as a public company. Including these expenses in the AISC metric provides visibility of the impact that general and administrative activities have on current operations and profitability on a per ounce basis.

Other Expense, net —Includes costs related to regional administration and community development to support current production. We exclude certain exceptional or unusual expenses from Other expense, net , such as restructuring, as these are not indicative to sustaining our current operations. Furthermore, this adjustment to Other expense, net is also consistent with the nature of the adjustments made to Net income (loss) as disclosed in the Company’s non-GAAP financial measure Adjusted net income (loss) . The allocation of these costs to gold and copper is determined using the same allocation used in the allocation of CAS between gold and copper at the Phoenix, Boddington, and Batu Hijau mines.

Treatment and Refining Costs —Includes costs paid to smelters for treatment and refining of our concentrates to produce the salable precious metal. These costs are presented net as a reduction of Sales .

Sustaining Capital —We determined sustaining capital as those capital expenditures that are necessary to maintain current gold production and execute the current mine plan. Capital expenditures to develop new operations, or related to projects at existing operations where these projects will enhance gold production or reserves, are considered development. We determined the breakout of sustaining and development capital costs based on a systematic review of our project portfolio in light of the nature of each project. Sustaining capital costs are relevant to the AISC metric as these are needed to maintain the Company’s current gold operations and provide improved transparency related to our ability to finance these expenditures from current operations. The allocation of these costs to gold and copper is determined using the same allocation used in the allocation of CAS between gold and copper at the Phoenix, Boddington, and Batu Hijau mines.


Three Months Ended June 30, 2014	Costs Applicable to Sales ^(1)(2)(3)		Remediation Costs ⁽⁴⁾		Advanced Projects and Exploration		General and Administrative		Other Expense, Net ⁽⁵⁾		Treatment and Refining Costs		Sustaining Capital ⁽⁶⁾		All-In Sustaining Costs		Ounces (000)/ Pounds (millions) Sold		All-In Sustaining Costs per oz/lb
GOLD
Carlin	$	209	$	1	$	7	$	—	$	3	$	—	$	35	$	255		209	$	1,220
Phoenix		35		1		—		—		—		3		1		40		57		702
Twin Creeks		49		—		3		—		—		—		29		81		96		844
La Herradura		26		—		2		—		—		—		9		37		46		804
Other North America		—		—		6		—		1		—		1		8		—		—

North America		319		2		18		—		4		3		75		421		408		1,032

Yanacocha		184		29		9		—		8		—		20		250		186		1,344
Other South America		—		—		9		—		1		—		—		10		—		—

South America		184		29		18		—		9		—		20		260		186		1,398

Boddington		133		2		—		—		—		1		21		157		148		1,061
Tanami		63		1		4		—		—		—		17		85		92		924
Jundee		43		2		—		—		1		—		9		55		76		724
Waihi		19		—		1		—		1		—		1		22		41		537
Kalgoorlie		65		—		2		—		—		1		4		72		75		960
Other Australia/New Zealand		—		—		1		—		3		—		5		9		—		—

Australia/New Zealand		323		5		8		—		5		2		57		400		432		926

Batu Hijau		9		—		—		—		1		—		3		13		9		1,444
Other Indonesia		—		—		—		—		1		—		—		1		—		—

Indonesia		9		—		—		—		2		—		3		14		9		1,556

Ahafo		65		1		5		—		1		—		36		108		121		893
Akyem		44		1		—		—		2		—		—		47		113		416
Other Africa		—		—		3		—		3		—		—		6		—		—

Africa		109		2		8		—		6		—		36		161		234		688

Corporate and Other		—		—		30		48		12		—		3		93		—		—

Total Gold	$	944	$	38	$	82	$	48	$	38	$	5	$	194	$	1,349		1,269	$	1,063

COPPER
Phoenix	$	30	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	1	$	2	$	7	$	41		13	$	3.15
Boddington		32		1		—		—		—		5		5		43		13		3.31
Batu Hijau		54		3		1		—		6		4		14		82		19		4.32

Total Copper	$	116	$	5	$	1	$	—	$	7	$	11	$	26	$	166		45	$	3.69

Consolidated	$	1,060	$	43	$	83	$	48	$	45	$	16	$	220	$	1,515

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .

⁽²⁾	Includes by-product credits of $24.

⁽³⁾	Includes planned stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments of $32 at Carlin, $2 at Twin Creeks, $20 at Yanacocha, $15 at Boddington, and $2 at Batu Hijau.

⁽⁴⁾	Remediation costs include operating accretion of $18 and amortization of asset retirement costs of $25.

⁽⁵⁾	Other expense, net is adjusted for restructuring costs of $6.

⁽⁶⁾	Excludes development capital expenditures, capitalized interest, and the increase in accrued capital of $34. The following are major development projects: Turf Vent Shaft, Conga, and Merian for 2014.


	Costs				Advanced				Other		Treatment and					All-In		Ounces (000)/ Pounds		All-In Sustaining
Three Months Ended	Applicable		Remediation		Projects and		General and		Expense,		Refining		Sustaining			Sustaining		(millions)		Costs
June 30, 2013	to Sales ^(1)(2)(3)		Costs ⁽⁴⁾		Exploration		Administrative		Net ⁽⁵⁾		Costs		Capital ⁽⁶⁾			Costs		Sold		per oz/lb
GOLD
Carlin	$	169	$	2	$	8	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	49		$	229		210	$	1,090
Phoenix		37		1		2		—		1		2		6			49		64		766
Twin Creeks		80		1		3		—		1		—		12			97		125		776
La Herradura		42		—		15		—		—		—		41			98		54		1,815
Other North America		—		—		13		—		1		—		9			23		—		—

North America		328		4		41		—		4		2		117			496		453		1,095

Yanacocha		201		22		10		—		15		—		31			279		296		943
Other South America		—		—		2		—		—		—		—			2		—		—

South America		201		22		12		—		15		—		31			281		296		949

Boddington		252		2		—		—		1		2		21			278		193		1,440
Tanami		64		—		3		—		1		—		20			88		60		1,467
Jundee		51		3		3		—		1		—		12			70		73		959
Waihi		25		1		1		—		—		—		5			32		25		1,280
Kalgoorlie		123		1		1		—		1		—		2			128		77		1,662
Other Australia/New Zealand		—		—		4		—		11		—		(1	)		14		—		—

Australia/New Zealand		515		7		12		—		15		2		59			610		428		1,425

Batu Hijau		63		—		1		—		1		1		5			71		12		5,917

Indonesia		63		—		1		—		1		1		5			71		12		5,917

Ahafo		85		1		11		—		2		—		38			137		142		965
Akyem		—		—		2		—		—		—		—			2		—		—
Other Africa		—		—		4		—		4		—		—			8		—		—

Africa		85		1		17		—		6		—		38			147		142		1,035

Corporate and Other		—		—		34		54		9		—		6			103		—		—

Total Gold	$	1,192	$	34	$	117	$	54	$	50	$	5	$	256		$	1,708		1,331	$	1,283

COPPER
Phoenix	$	15	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	1	$	2		$	19		8	$	2.38
Boddington		62		—		—		—		—		5		6			73		19		3.84
Batu Hijau		413		2		4		—		6		11		30			466		37		12.59

Total Copper	$	490	$	2	$	5	$	—	$	6	$	17	$	38		$	558		64	$	8.72

Consolidated	$	1,682	$	36	$	122	$	54	$	56	$	22	$	294		$	2,266

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .

⁽²⁾	Includes by-product credits of $24.

⁽³⁾	Includes stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments of $49 at Yanacocha, $86 at Boddington, $0 at Tanami, $1 at Waihi, $45 at Kalgoorlie, and $366 at Batu Hijau.

⁽⁴⁾	Remediation costs include operating accretion of $15 and amortization of asset retirement costs of $21.

⁽⁵⁾	Other expense, net is adjusted for restructuring costs of $21.

⁽⁶⁾

Excludes development capital expenditures, capitalized interest, and the decrease in accrued capital of $316. The following are major development projects: Phoenix Copper Leach, Turf Vent Shaft, Vista Vein, La Herradura Mill, Yanacocha Bio Leach, Conga, Merian, Ahafo North, Ahafo Mill Expansion, Subika Underground, and Akyem for 2013.


	Costs				Advanced				Other		Treatment and				All-In		Ounces (000)/ Pounds		All-In Sustaining
Six Months Ended	Applicable		Remediation		Projects and		General and		Expense,		Refining		Sustaining		Sustaining		(millions)		Costs
June 30, 2014	to Sales ^(1)(2)(3)		Costs ⁽⁴⁾		Exploration		Administrative		Net ⁽⁵⁾		Costs		Capital ⁽⁶⁾		Costs		Sold		per oz/lb
GOLD
Carlin	$	401	$	2	$	11	$	—	$	4	$	—	$	55	$	473		437	$	1,082
Phoenix		69		1		1		—		1		5		8		85		112		759
Twin Creeks		104		1		4		—		1		—		61		171		199		859
La Herradura		42		1		6		—		—		—		13		62		69		899
Other North America		—		—		12		—		4		—		6		22		—		—

North America		616		5		34		—		10		5		143		813		817		995

Yanacocha		405		59		16		—		17		—		34		531		392		1,355
Other South America		—		—		17		—		1		—		—		18		—		—

South America		405		59		33		—		18		—		34		549		392		1,401

Boddington		275		5		—		—		1		2		36		319		315		1,013
Tanami		118		2		5		—		1		—		37		163		173		942
Jundee		85		5		1		—		1		—		16		108		139		777
Waihi		38		—		1		—		1		—		2		42		66		636
Kalgoorlie		142		1		3		—		—		1		6		153		167		916
Other Australia/New Zealand		—		—		2		—		11		—		5		18		—		—

Australia/New Zealand		658		13		12		—		15		3		102		803		860		934

Batu Hijau		17		1		—		—		2		1		5		26		15		1,733
Other Indonesia		—		—		—		—		1		—		—		1		—		—

Indonesia		17		1		—		—		3		1		5		27		15		1,800

Ahafo		126		2		14		—		4		—		57		203		231		879
Akyem		82		1		—		—		5		—		2		90		232		388
Other Africa		—		—		5		—		4		—		—		9		—		—

Africa		208		3		19		—		13		—		59		302		463		652

Corporate and Other		—		—		59		93		17		—		7		176		—		—

Total Gold	$	1,904	$	81	$	157	$	93	$	76	$	9	$	350	$	2,670		2,547	$	1,048

COPPER
Phoenix	$	56	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	1	$	3	$	8	$	69		24	$	2.88
Boddington		72		2		—		—		—		11		8		93		28		3.32
Batu Hijau		111		8		2		—		13		9		27		170		38		4.47

Total Copper	$	239	$	11	$	2	$	—	$	14	$	23	$	43	$	332		90	$	3.69

Consolidated	$	2,143	$	92	$	159	$	93	$	90	$	32	$	393	$	3,002

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .

⁽²⁾	Includes by-product credits of $47.

⁽³⁾	Includes planned stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments of $52 at Carlin, $4 at Twin Creeks, $55 at Yanacocha, $40 at Boddington, and $31 at Batu Hijau.

⁽⁴⁾	Remediation costs include operating accretion of $36 and amortization of asset retirement costs of $56.

⁽⁵⁾	Other expense, net is adjusted for restructuring costs of $13.

⁽⁶⁾	Excludes development capital expenditures, capitalized interest, and the decrease in accrued capital of $96. The following are major development projects: Turf Vent Shaft, Conga, and Merian for 2014.


	Costs				Advanced				Other		Treatment and				All-In		Ounces (000)/ Pounds		All-In Sustaining
Six Months Ended	Applicable		Remediation		Projects and		General and		Expense,		Refining		Sustaining		Sustaining		(millions)		Costs
June 30, 2013	to Sales ^(1)(2)(3)		Costs ⁽⁴⁾		Exploration		Administrative		Net ⁽⁵⁾		Costs		Capital ⁽⁶⁾		Costs		Sold		per oz/lb
GOLD
Carlin	$	348	$	3	$	19	$	—	$	3	$	—	$	83	$	456		431	$	1,058
Phoenix		78		1		5		—		2		4		7		97		98		990
Twin Creeks		132		2		6		—		2		—		31		173		221		783
La Herradura		82		—		21		—		—		—		50		153		109		1,404
Other North America		—		—		21		—		3		—		12		36		—		—

North America		640		6		72		—		10		4		183		915		859		1,065

Yanacocha		361		45		23		—		25		—		68		522		575		908
Other South America		—		—		5		—		—		—		—		5		—		—

South America		361		45		28		—		25		—		68		527		575		917

Boddington		426		4		—		—		1		3		43		477		393		1,214
Tanami		139		1		5		—		1		—		43		189		121		1,562
Jundee		105		7		7		—		1		—		24		144		149		966
Waihi		53		2		2		—		—		—		7		64		55		1,164
Kalgoorlie		198		3		2		—		1		—		4		208		151		1,377
Other Australia/New Zealand		—		—		8		—		20		—		—		28		—		—

Australia/New Zealand		921		17		24		—		24		3		121		1,110		869		1,277

Batu Hijau		70		—		2		—		3		2		8		85		19		4,474

Indonesia		70		—		2		—		3		2		8		85		19		4,474

Ahafo		151		2		24		—		2		—		80		259		261		992
Akyem		—		—		5		—		—		—		—		5		—		—
Other Africa		—		—		6		—		11		—		—		17		—		—

Africa		151		2		35		—		13		—		80		281		261		1,077

Corporate and Other		—		—		61		110		15		—		8		194		—		—

Total Gold	$	2,143	$	70	$	222	$	110	$	90	$	9	$	468	$	3,112		2,583	$	1,205

COPPER
Phoenix	$	26	$	—	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	2	$	3	$	33		12	$	2.75
Boddington		110		1		—		—		—		10		11		132		39		3.38
Batu Hijau		460		4		9		—		11		17		50		551		60		9.18

Total Copper	$	596	$	5	$	11	$	—	$	11	$	29	$	64	$	716		111	$	6.45

Consolidated	$	2,739	$	75	$	233	$	110	$	101	$	38	$	532	$	3,828

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .

⁽²⁾	Includes by-product credits of $54.

⁽³⁾	Includes stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments of $53 at Yanacocha, $86 at Boddington, $1 at Tanami, $3 at Waihi, $45 at Kalgoorlie, and $366 at Batu Hijau.

⁽⁴⁾	Remediation costs include operating accretion of $30 and amortization of asset retirement costs of $45.

⁽⁵⁾	Other expense, net is adjusted for restructuring costs of $30 and TMAC transaction costs of $45.

⁽⁶⁾

Excludes development capital expenditures, capitalized interest, and the decrease in accrued capital of $588. The following are major development projects: Phoenix Copper Leach, Turf Vent Shaft, Vista Vein, La Herradura Mill, Yanacocha Bio Leach, Conga, Merian, Ahafo North, Ahafo Mill Expansion, Subika Underground, and Akyem for 2013.

Operating margin per ounce/pound

Operating margin per ounce/pound are non-GAAP financial measures. These measures are calculated by subtracting the costs applicable to sales per ounce of gold and per pound of copper from the average realized gold price per ounce and copper price per pound, respectively. These measures are calculated on a consistent basis for the periods presented on a consolidated basis. Operating margin per ounce/pound statistics are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP. Other companies may calculate these measures differently. Operating margin per ounce/pound is calculated as follows:


	Gold
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Average realized price per ounce	$	1,283		$	1,386		$	1,288		$	1,505
Costs applicable to sales per ounce		(744	)		(895	)		(747	)		(830	)

	$	539		$	491		$	541		$	675


	Copper
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Average realized price per pound	$	3.01		$	2.69		$	2.76		$	2.87
Costs applicable to sales per pound		(2.53	)		(7.59	)		(2.62	)		(5.35	)

	$	0.48		$	(4.90	)	$	0.14		$	(2.48	)

Safe Harbor Statement

Certain statements contained in this report (including information incorporated by reference) are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provided for under these sections. Our forward-looking statements include, without limitation: (a) statements regarding future earnings, and the sensitivity of earnings to gold and other metal prices; (b) estimates of future mineral production and sales for specific operations and on a consolidated basis; (c) estimates of future production costs and other expenses, for specific operations and on a consolidated basis; (d) estimates of future cash flows and the sensitivity of cash flows to gold and other metal prices; (e) estimates of future capital expenditures and other cash needs for specific operations and on a consolidated basis and expectations as to the funding thereof; (f) statements as to the projected development of certain ore deposits, including estimates of development and other capital costs, financing plans for these deposits, and expected production commencement dates; (g) estimates of future costs and other liabilities for certain environmental matters; (h) estimates of reserves, and statements regarding future exploration results and reserve replacement; (i) statements regarding modifications to Newmont’s hedge positions; (j) statements regarding future transactions relating to portfolio management or rationalization efforts; and (k) projected synergies and costs associated with acquisitions and related matters.

Where we express an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, our forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected, or implied by those forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements (“cautionary statements”) are disclosed under “Risk Factors” in the Newmont Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as well as in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Many of these factors are beyond Newmont’s ability to control or predict. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.

All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Newmont or to persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements. Newmont disclaims any intention or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

(dollars in millions, except per ounce and per pound amounts).

Metal Prices

Changes in the market price of gold significantly affect our profitability and cash flow. Gold prices can fluctuate widely due to numerous factors, such as demand; forward selling by producers; central bank sales, purchases and lending; investor sentiment; the strength of the U.S. dollar; inflation, deflation, or other general price instability; and global mine production levels. Changes in the market price of copper also affect our profitability and cash flow. Copper is traded on established international exchanges and copper prices generally reflect market supply and demand, but can also be influenced by speculative trading in the commodity or by currency exchange rates.

Decreases in the market price of gold and copper can also significantly affect the value of our product inventory and stockpiles and it may be necessary to record a write-down to the net realizable value (“NRV”). NRV represents the estimated future sales price based on short-term and long-term metals prices, less estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale. The primary factors that influence the need to record write-downs of stockpiles and product inventory include short-term and long-term metals prices and costs for production inputs such as labor, fuel and energy, materials and supplies, as well as realized ore grades and recovery rates. The significant assumptions in determining the stockpile NRV for each mine site reporting unit at June 30, 2014 included production cost and capitalized expenditure assumptions unique to each operation, a long-term gold price of $1,300 per ounce, a long-term copper price of $3.00 per pound and an Australian to U.S. dollar exchange rate of $ 0.920.

The NRV measurement involves the use of estimates and assumptions unique to each mining operation regarding current and future operating and capital costs, metal recoveries, production levels, commodity prices, proven and probable reserve quantities, engineering data and other factors. A high degree of judgment is involved in determining such assumptions and estimates and no assurance can be given that actual results will not differ significantly from those estimates and assumptions.

Hedging

Our strategy is to provide shareholders with leverage to changes in gold and copper prices by selling our production at spot market prices. Consequently, we do not hedge our gold and copper sales. We have and will continue to manage certain risks associated with commodity input costs, interest rates and foreign currencies using the derivative market.

By using derivatives, we are affected by credit risk, market risk and market liquidity risk. Credit risk is the risk that a third party might fail to fulfill its performance obligations under the terms of a financial instrument. We mitigate credit risk by entering into derivatives with high credit quality counterparties, limiting the amount of exposure to each counterparty, and monitoring the financial condition of the counterparties. Market risk is the risk that the fair value of a derivative might be adversely affected by a change in underlying commodity prices, interest rates, or currency exchange rates, and that this in turn affects our financial condition. We manage market risk by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken. We mitigate this potential risk to our financial condition by establishing trading agreements with counterparties under which we are not required to post any collateral or make any margin calls on our derivatives. Our counterparties cannot require settlement solely because of an adverse change in the fair value of a derivative. Market liquidity risk is the risk that a derivative cannot be eliminated quickly, by either liquidating it or by establishing an offsetting position. Under the terms of our trading agreements, counterparties cannot require us to immediately settle outstanding derivatives, except upon the occurrence of customary events of default such as covenant breaches, including financial covenants, insolvency or bankruptcy. We further mitigate market liquidity risk by spreading out the maturity of our derivatives over time.

Cash Flow Hedges

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We had the following foreign currency derivative contracts outstanding at June 30, 2014:


	Expected Maturity Date
	2014			2015			2016			2017			2018			Total Average
A$ Operating Fixed Forward Contracts:
A$ notional (millions)		153			270			158			105			6			692
Average rate ($/A$)		0.99			0.98			0.95			0.93			0.92			0.97
Expected hedge ratio		19	%		18	%		11	%		7	%		4	%
NZ$ Operating Fixed Forward Contracts:
NZ$ notional (millions)		32			47			7			—			—			86
Average rate ($/NZ$)		0.80			0.80			0.81			—			—			0.80
Expected hedge ratio		62	%		38	%		14	%		—			—

The fair value of the A$ foreign currency operating derivative contracts was a net liability position of $35 at June 30, 2014 and $96 at December 31, 2013. The fair value of the NZ$ foreign currency derivative contracts was a net asset position of $5 at June 30, 2014 and $1 at December 31, 2013.

Diesel Price Risk

We had the following diesel derivative contracts outstanding at June 30, 2014:


	Expected Maturity Date
	2014			2015			2016			2017			Total Average
Diesel Fixed Forward Contracts:
Diesel gallons (millions)		12			18			10			2			42
Average rate ($/gallon)		2.85			2.78			2.69			2.67			2.77
Expected hedge ratio		60	%		46	%		26	%		8	%

Commodity Price Risk

Our provisional copper and gold sales contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale of the gold and copper concentrates at the prevailing indices’ prices at the time of sale. The embedded derivative, which does not qualify for hedge accounting, is marked to market through earnings each period prior to final settlement.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

During the fiscal period covered by this report, the Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

Information regarding legal proceedings is contained in Note 26 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS.

There were no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A of Part 1 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the SEC on February 20, 2014.

ITEM 2.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Period

Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased

Average
Price
Paid
Per
Share

Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs

Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares that
may yet be Purchased
under the Plans or
Programs

April 1, 2014 through April 30, 2014

—

N/A

May 1, 2014 through May 31, 2014

—

N/A

June 1, 2014 through June 30, 2014

—

N/A

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

At Newmont, safety is a core value and we strive for superior performance. Our health and safety management system, which includes detailed standards and procedures for safe production, addresses topics such as employee training, risk management, workplace inspection, emergency response, accident investigation and program auditing. In addition to strong leadership and involvement from all levels of the organization, these programs and procedures form the cornerstone of safety at Newmont, ensuring that employees are provided a safe and healthy environment and are intended to reduce workplace accidents, incidents and losses, comply with all mining-related regulations and provide support for both regulators and the industry to improve mine safety.

In addition, we have established our “Rapid Response” process to mitigate and prevent the escalation of adverse consequences if existing risk management controls fail, particularly if an incident may have the potential to seriously impact the safety of employees, the community or the environment. This process provides appropriate support to an affected site to complement their technical response to an incident, so as to reduce the impact by considering the environmental, strategic, legal, financial and public image aspects of the incident, to ensure communications are being carried out in accordance with legal and ethical requirements and to identify actions in addition to those addressing the immediate hazards.

The operation of our U.S. based mines is subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”). MSHA inspects our mines on a regular basis and issues various citations and orders when it believes a violation has occurred under the Mine Act. Following passage of The Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006, MSHA significantly increased the numbers of citations and orders charged against mining operations. The dollar penalties assessed for citations issued has also increased in recent years.

Newmont is required to report certain mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K, and that required information is included in Exhibit 95 and is incorporated by reference into this Quarterly Report.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION.

Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.

On April 23, 2014, the Board of Directors amended the Newmont Senior Executive Compensation Program of Newmont and the Newmont Strategic Stock Unit Bonus Program for Grades E-5 to E-6 to address the treatment of the strategic stock unit bonus in the event of a change of control. The amended plans provide that upon a change of control the strategic stock unit bonus shall convert to restricted stock units at target level with a vesting period for the remainder of the one year performance period and the following two years. Additionally, the Board amended the Newmont Senior Executive Compensation Program to address the treatment of the performance leveraged stock unit bonus in the first year of the three year performance period in the event of a change in control, to align it with the treatment of performance leveraged stock unit bonuses in years two and three of the performance period. Specifically, in the event of a change of control, the performance leveraged stock unit bonuses for all years (previously the program excluded the performance leveraged stock unit bonus in the first year) shall be determined using the change in control price with a pro-rata actual payout immediately delivered in common stock for the percentage of the three year performance period that has elapsed and the remainder of the performance leveraged stock unit bonus converting to restricted stock units that shall cliff vest at the end of the three year performance period. Finally, the Board amended the Newmont Section 16 Officer and Senior Executive Annual Incentive Compensation Program to provide that upon a upon a change of control, each eligible employee shall become entitled to the payment of a target annual bonus if a change of control occurs between September 1 and December 31, and pro-rata target bonus if a change of control occurs between January 1 and August 31.

Amendment to the Registrant’s Code of Ethics.

On April 23, 2014, our Board approved a new Code of Conduct, which was made available on www.newmont.com under the Investor Relations/Governance section of our website. It provides clear guidance on the behaviors Newmont employees and those engaged in activities on our behalf must demonstrate at all times. Our Board and executive leadership team are committed to making sure Newmont is a leader in how we conduct ourselves. Through strong ethical business practices and strict compliance with the law, we generate sustainable value for all our stakeholders.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS.

(a)

The exhibits to this report are listed in the Exhibit Index.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		N EWMONT M INING C ORPORATION (Registrant)

Date: July 29, 2014		/s/ LAURIE BRLAS
		Laurie Brlas Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: July 29, 2014		/s/ CHRISTOPHER S. HOWSON
		Christopher S. Howson Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit Number		Description

10.1	—	Amendment One to the December 31, 2008 restated Pension Equalization Plan of Newmont USA Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant, effective January 1, 2014, filed herewith.

10.2	—	Mineral Agreement dated and effective as of November 22, 2013, between the Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant, as clarified by bulletin and letters dated September 10, 2013 and November 21, 2013, respectively, filed herewith.

12.1	—	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges, filed herewith.

31.1	—	Certification Pursuant to Rule 13A-14 or 15-D-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by the Principal Executive Officer, filed herewith.

31.2	—	Certification Pursuant to Rule 13A-14 or 15-D-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by the Principal Financial Officer, filed herewith.

32.1	—	Statement Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by the Principal Executive Officer, filed herewith. ⁽¹⁾

32.2	—	Statement Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by the Principal Financial Officer, filed herewith. ⁽¹⁾

95	—	Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, filed herewith.

101	—	101.INS XBRL Instance

		101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

		101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

		101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels

		101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

		101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition

⁽¹⁾	This document is being furnished in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8212 and 34-47551.

Exhibit 10.1

AMENDMENT ONE

TO THE

PENSION EQUALIZATION PLAN OF NEWMONT

WHEREAS, the Pension Equalization Plan of Newmont (the “Plan”) was restated by Newmont USA Limited (the “Plan Sponsor”) effective December 31, 2008;

WHEREAS, the Plan Sponsor wishes to amend the Plan effective January 1, 2014, except as otherwise indicated; and

WHEREAS, Section 8.02 of the Plan authorizes the Plan Sponsor to amend the Plan from time to time.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1. Section 4.01, “Normal Retirement Benefit,” subsection (c) and (d) are added as follows:

(c) With respect to Eligible Employees who are active Participants in the Plan on June 30, 2014, and are not Stable Value Participants as of June 30, 2014 in the Pension Plan, and whose age plus years of Service as of June 30, 2014 calculated as of June 30, 2014 using the date of birth equal to the first of the month coincident with or following actual date of birth, plus Service as of June 30, 2014, and rounded up to the next number of whole years, equals or is greater than 50, an additional transition credit beginning July 1, 2014 of nine (9) percent shall be applied to their Stable Value Retirement Benefit under this Plan and applies only to pay in excess of the IRS compensation limit. This credit is in addition to any transition credit that is made under Section 3.14 of the Pension Plan.

The transition credits will be applied for the Participant’s continuous employment with the Company beginning July 1, 2014 and will cease upon termination. If a Participant is subsequently rehired, no transition credits will be accrued upon reemployment.

(d) With respect to Eligible Employees who first become Participants in the Plan or are rehired on or after July 1, 2014, (a) and (b) above shall be applied based solely on the stable value benefit formula set forth in the Pension Plan beginning with the year the Participant becomes eligible for the Plan.

2. Section 4.04, “Method and Time of Payment,” is restated as follows:

Section 4.04. Method and Time of Payment . The Retirement Payment which is payable to a Participant pursuant to Section 4.01, 4.02 or 4.03 shall be paid in the form of an Actuarial Equivalent lump sum payment. The lump sum payment shall be paid in a single cash lump sum as soon as administratively possible following the date of the

Pension Equalization Plan of Newmont

Amendment One Effective January 1, 2014

Page 1 of 2

Participant’s Separation from Service with the Company, and in no event later than the 15 ^th day of the third month following the year in which the Participant Separates from Service, subject to the provisions of Section 9.14. If a Participant receives a lump sum distribution, there shall be no spousal benefits payable under Article V, but a benefit would be payable in accordance with Article V if the Participant dies before receiving the lump sum payment. If a Participant receives a lump sum distribution under the Plan and is later reemployed by the Company, the amount of any benefit payable in the future to the Participant under this Plan shall be reduced by the Actuarial Equivalent of the benefit previously paid to the Participant as a lump sum.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, any payment election made pursuant to the terms of the Prior Plan shall be paid in the manner and at the time elected by the Participant under the terms of the Prior Plan.

3. The Administration Committee or its delegate is hereby authorized to take any action necessary to implement this amendment.

The foregoing was adopted this 26th day of June, 2014.


NEWMONT USA LIMITED

By		/s/ Stephen Paul Gottesfeld
Name		Stephen Paul Gottesfeld
Title		Vice President

Pension Equalization Plan of Newmont

Amendment One Effective January 1, 2014

Page 2 of 2

Exhibit 10.2

MINERAL AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made as of the 22th day of November, 2013 by and among:

THE REPUBLIC OF SURINAME , residing in Paramaribo, for the purposes set forth herein represented by the MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES and the MINISTER OF FINANCE pursuant to the “Act Merian Gold Project”, hereinafter referred to as “the Republic of Suriname”.

and

SURINAME GOLD COMPANY LLC. , a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, United States of America, with its principal offices in 6363 South Fiddler’s Green Circle, Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111, United States of America, registered to do business in the Republic of Suriname, represented for the purpose hereof by its Managing Director Mr. Adriaan van Kersen, hereinafter referred to as “Surgold”.

PREAMBLE

A. WHEREAS , all gold resources present in the territory of the Republic of Suriname are the property of the Republic of Suriname, and it holds exclusive sovereign rights with regard to the exploration for and exploitation of all such gold resources;

B. WHEREAS , the Republic of Suriname desires to ensure the exploitation of these gold resources in a prudent and environmentally sound manner and in accordance with accepted international standards;

C. WHEREAS , Surgold holds the Merian Right of Exploration (hereinafter defined);

D. WHEREAS , on 25 October 2007 Surgold submitted an application for the Merian Right of Exploitation (hereinafter defined);

E. WHEREAS , the Minister of Natural Resources by letter dated 30 November 2007 informed Surgold of the intention of the Republic of Suriname to exercise its legal right for an option to participate in the requested exploitation within the Merian Right of Exploitation;

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

F. WHEREAS , the Republic of Suriname and Surgold confirm that they will cooperate to be able to achieve the mutual above-mentioned aspirations and in respect thereof enter into this Agreement; and,

G. WHEREAS , the Republic of Suriname deems it appropriate to provide for the making of such regulations and administrative orders by the duly authorized Ministers, boards and other instrumentalities of the Republic of Suriname, including ratification of this Agreement by The National Assembly, and the giving of such undertakings in respect of the matters hereinafter described;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

Chapter 1 INTERPRETATION

1.1 Definitions

Unless otherwise required or indicated by the context, the following terms and expressions shall have the following meanings ascribed thereto:

“ Commencement of Commercial Production ” means the last day of the first period of thirty (30) consecutive calendar days during which Mining has been conducted pursuant to the Merian Right of Exploitation, for the purpose of earning revenue, on a reasonably regular basis

This at an average rate over such thirty day period of no less than sixty percent (60%) of the design capacity of the processing facilities forming part of the Assets as established by the Feasibility Study.

For the determination of the “Commencement of Commercial Production” all days are excluded, if any, where Mining is legally required to be suspended, as well as periods during which Minerals produced from Mining are shipped from the Project Lands for testing purposes

“ Assets ” means each Right of Exploration and Right of Exploitation within the Area of Interest, Minerals, facilities, equipment, data, reports, intellectual property and all other real and personal property, tangible and intangible, owned by Surgold and upon formation of the Venture, contributed by Surgold for use by the Venture.

“Anti-Corruption Laws” means the anti-corruption laws of the Republic of Suriname, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, and any other anti-corruptions laws, statutes or regulations applicable to a Party.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

“ Arm’s-Length Transaction ” means a transaction between Affiliates which shall be consistent with the result that would have been realized, if the parties to the transaction had not been Affiliates.

“ Operations ” means all or any Exploration, Development and Mining, closure, reclamation and any other act, including acts of administration and management, performed by or on behalf of Surgold, prior to the Initial Contribution, or by the Venture from and after the Initial Contribution pursuant to the Project or this Agreement.

“ Corrective Action ” shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 15.5 hereof.

“ Effective Date ” is the date on which this Agreement was signed by both Parties and thus becomes effective.

“ Participating Interest ” means the percentage participating interest of respectively Surgold or the NV 2 defined in the Venture Agreement.

“ Minerals ” means (gold and) all metals that commonly occur with gold in nature, such as copper, silver, platinum-group metals, telliriumproduced from each Right of Exploitation under this Agreement.

“State-owned Land” is all land in Suriname in respect of which others cannot proof a right of ownership, and which as such belongs to the Republic of Suriname.

“Unilateral Action” shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 15.5 hereof.

“ ESIA ” or “ Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ” is an intensive and rigorous assessment on the environmental and social impact of the Project, as currently defined by NIMOS in accordance with its customary guidelines, to be conducted prior to the start of the activities on such Project.

The ESIA for any Project will be a written report prepared by or on behalf of Surgold that describes in detail:

1) the proposed Project, 2) the existing environment, 3) the anticipated cumulative direct and indirect impacts of the Project on the communities and environment of Project Lands, 4) alternatives for reducing impacts, and 5) mitigation and monitoring measures that will be implemented, including an environmental management plan, a closure and reclamation plan, and a prevention and emergency response plan for the Project.

“ Expatriate(s) ” and “ Expatriate Employee ” shall respectively have the meanings ascribed thereto in Section 9.1 hereof.

“ Exploration ” means any activity performed with a view to determining the existence, location, quantity and quality of Minerals.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

“ Area of Interest ” means the area described on the map attached as Attachment XIII.

“ Affiliate ” means, in relation to Surgold, a corporation or other entity:

(a)

which is directly or indirectly controlled by Surgold; or

(b)

which directly or indirectly controls Surgold; or

(c)

which is, directly or indirectly, controlled by a company or corporation that also, directly or indirectly, controls Surgold; or

(d)

which is, directly or indirectly, controlled by a company or corporation that also, directly or indirectly, is controlled by Surgold.

For the purposes of this definition “Control” of a company means the power to direct, administer and dictate policies of such company, it being understood and agreed that Control of a company can be exercised without direct or indirect ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of its voting shares, provided always that direct or indirect ownership of fifty percent or more of such voting shares shall be deemed to be effective Control.

“ General Accepted Accounting Principles ” or “ GAAP ” shall mean those generally accepted accounting principles and practices which are recognized as such in the United States of America.

“ Geologisch Mijnbouwkundige Dienst ” or “ GMD ” is the government entity of the Republic of Suriname monitoring the activities in Suriname with respect to geological mining or other government entity of the Republic of Suriname assuming its tasks completely or partially, or a legal entity to which those tasks shall be assigned completely or partially.

“ Feasibility Study ” means a written report containing a description and analysis of the technical, operating, economic and commercial viability of bringing into production and operating a Mine within the boundary of the Merian Right of Exploitation, and the associated facilities related thereto,

This report would be acceptable to a reasonable financial institution experienced in mining finance for the purpose of financing a mine (following normal additional due diligence) on the Merian Gold Project and associated facilities related thereto, and which, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, shall include:

(a)

estimates of the costs of any additional exploration, testing and evaluation and all pre-production, Development and construction of production facilities, with breakdown by itemization of plant facility and major commodity (including the accuracy of the estimate), and suitable to support a request for project funding;

(b)

the estimated recoverable reserves of Minerals, as defined in the “Guide for Reporting Exploration Results, Mineral Resources, and Mineral Reserves”, 2007, or most recent version, and in the “Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration”, (“SME”), and the estimated average composition and content thereof which may be produced from the Merian Gold Project together with the tonnage, grade, and description of the method in which such reserves were calculated and estimated;

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

(c)

procedures for Development, Mining, and Production of ore from the Merian Gold Project and a detailed timetable for the planned Development and Operations;

(d)

a metallurgical report based upon, at a minimum, laboratory tests of ore samples, which report sets forth and demonstrates the metallurgical feasibility of proposed methods of milling ore and the percentage of Minerals which can be removed and marketed through such processes;

(e)

the nature and extent of the machinery, equipment, and other facilities proposed to be acquired for the purposes of producing ore or concentrates from the Merian Gold Project (and the estimated annual costs thereof, including the costs of marketing research), which may include mill or beneficiation facilities for processing such ore. If in the judgment of the person conducting the Feasibility Study, the size, extent, and location of the Minerals on the Merian Gold Project which will be available for processing in such mill or beneficiation facilities are of such nature that they can be economically developed, in which event such person shall also include a preliminary design for any such mill or beneficiation facilities in the Feasibility Study;

(f)

a schedule of required manpower, both during development/construction and operating phases, including labor pool assessment and proposal for training toward reducing possibility of labor deficiency, if required;

(g)

the total costs, including the annual capital and operating budgets (in the present value of the US dollars), which the person conducting the Feasibility Study reasonably estimates will be required to purchase, construct and install all machines and equipment referred to in the preceding subparagraph (e), including a schedule of the timing of the capital requirements for such purchases; and estimates for capital costs to be incurred up until the Commencement of Commercial Production, including unexpected expenses and price indexing according to the currency expected;

(h)

development of a cash flow model suitable for project analysis;

(i)

estimated rates of return based upon the projected cash flow to be generated by the commercial production of the Project, as contemplated by the report;

(j)

a total investment outline, which, in addition to the costs described in subparagraph (a) above, shall also include the funds required for start-up costs, interest costs, and working capital.

The rates of return shall be based on the receipt of operating cash flow (1) before the payment of taxes on income or any allowances for such taxes, and (2) after the payment of taxes on income or any allowances for such taxes;

(k)

a total economic feasibility report, taking into account subparagraphs (a) to (j) above and all other matters.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

The person conducting the Feasibility Study shall include an estimate of the financial return for the Mine based on the estimated market price of the product, as determined by Surgold; and

(l)

a recommendation that the Operations be commenced and conducted in accordance with the ESIA.

“ IFC ” shall mean the International Finance Corporation.

“IFC’s General Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines and the IFC’s Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Mining” means the IFC Guidelines set out in Attachment II and does not include any future versions of, or amendments to, those Guidelines.

“ IFRS ” means the International Financial Reporting Standards published by the International Accounting Standards Board.

“ Initial Contribution ” means the first contribution by Surgold or NV 2 to the Venture, as established in the Venture Agreement, by means of which a Participating Interest is obtained.

“ Annual Profit ” shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in Attachment X.

“Merian ESIA” means the ESIA for the Merian Gold Project.

“ Merian Gold Project ” means Operations conducted pursuant to the Merian Right of Exploration and, upon granting, pursuant to the Merian Right of Exploitation, in accordance with this Agreement.

“ Merian Right of Exploitation ” means the Right of Exploitation for gold and other Minerals to be granted to Surgold in accordance with this Agreement, as requested by Surgold on 25 October 2007, as amended on 27 January 2009, and as further amended on 24 September 2009, for a plot of land having a surface area of 16,788.35 hectares, which shall have an initial term of twenty-five (25) years.

The location map and coordinates, as approved by the State Surveyor, are included in Attachment V to this Agreement.

“ Merian Right of Exploration ” means that certain Right of Exploration for gold and other Minerals granted to Surgold on February 7, 2001 by decree of the Minister of Natural Resources (GMD no. 113/00), recorded on April 26, 2001, in register H 4 under no. 461,

This right was extended on 16 February 2004 by administrative decision of the Minister of Natural Resources (GMD No. 501/03) and again on 13 February 2006 by administrative decision of the Minister of Natural Resources (GMD No. 501/05), for plot of land having a surface area of 25,916.25 hectares, the latter of which is inserted as Attachment VI to this Agreement.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

“ Mine ” or “ Mines ” means any deposit of Minerals located within Project Lands and all facilities constructed or established with a view to exploiting such Minerals from such deposit and includes, without limitation, all movable and immovable property, tangible and intangible, owned, possessed, used or controlled by Surgold on Project Lands, including any Right of Exploitation.

“ Mining ” includes the extracting, processing, milling, smelting, beneficiation, storing, handling, delivering and or the storage and containment of mill tailings and disposition of ore containing Minerals and any other activity incidental thereto that may reasonably be required in connection therewith including, without limitation, the procurement and transportation of machinery, equipment, materials and supplies, and moving and stock-piling of waste.

“ Parent Company ” means the Party that has the authority to exercise Control (as “Control” is defined in the definition of Affiliate) over Surgold.

“ Negative Effect ” shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 15.5 hereof.

“ NIMOS ” or “ Nationaal Instituut voor Milieu en Developmentin Suriname ” is the government foundation of the Republic of Suriname that is charged with environmental policy and environmental management in the interest of a sustainable development of the natural resources of the Republic of Suriname, or another legal person to whom this task is wholly or partially transferred.

“ NV 2 ” shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 3.2 hereof.

“ Development ” means all work that may reasonably be required in connection with the preparation of a mine or the conduct of Mining including, but not limited to, engineering, design, the construction and installation of any related facilities, and the procurement of materials, tools, equipment and supplies, and in the case of the Merian Gold Project, all this in accordance with the Feasibility Study.

“ Option ” has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 3.1 hereof.

“ Agreement ” shall mean this Mineral Agreement including all its attachments.

“ Party ” means a party to this Agreement and “ Parties ” means the parties to this Agreement collectively.

“ Porknocking ” is the practice of small scale mining to recover gold from alluvium and saprolite, which practice is not permitted or regulated by Law.

“ Project ” means any and all Exploration and Operations conducted by Surgold, at all times prior to the Initial Contribution, and all Exploration and Operations conducted by Surgold from and after the Initial Contribution, located partially or wholly within the Area of Interest pursuant to the Merian Right of Exploitation or any other Right of Exploitation, in accordance with this Agreement.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

“ Project Financing ” means the designated funding available for project implementation from internal sources, private sources, the public markets and/or a syndicate of banks.

“ Project Lands ” means any plots of land and the infrastructures to be used, acquired, constructed, maintained or improved within the Area of Interest for Project purposes and includes any property, rights and interests referred to in Chapter 5 hereof, and each Right of Exploration and each Right of Exploitation held by Surgold or the Venture.

“ Right of Exploitation ” means a Right of Exploitation for gold and other minerals granted to Surgold located within the Area of Interest.

“ Right of Exploration ” means a Right of Exploration for gold and other minerals granted to Surgold located within the Area of Interest.

“Royalty” shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 20 hereof.

“ Service Fees ” shall be the fees paid by Surgold to its Parent Company for management-related services.

Service Fees shall be paid for the categories of services described in Attachment III.

“ Surgold ” means Suriname Gold Company LLC.

“ Surinamese Dollar ” and the symbol “ SRD ” means the lawful unit of currency in the Republic of Suriname.

“ U.S. Dollar ” and the symbol “ US$ ” means the lawful unit of currency of the United States of America.

“ Venture ” is the Commanditaire Vennootschap (CV), the sole managing partner of which shall be Surgold, and of which the NV 2 will become the limited partner upon the Republic of Suriname’s exercise and performance of the Option.

“ Venture Agreement ” means the Commanditaire Vennootschap agreement (CV Agreement) attached herein as Attachment I.

“ Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights ” are the principles of security and human rights described in Attachment VII.

“ Business Day ” means any calendar day other than a Saturday or Sunday or any day given equal status to the Sunday.

“ Law ” or “ Laws ” means any written law of the Republic of Suriname and any other act as defined in the laws, including the explanatory notes and memorandums.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

“ Mining Act ” means the Act of May 8, 1986, containing provisions regarding the tracing and exploitation of minerals, published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Suriname of 1986 No. 28, and includes any subsidiary or alternative legislation made pursuant thereto.

“ Act Issuance of State-owned Land ” is the ‘Decree of 15 June 1982, containing regulations in respect of the granting of state-owned land published in the Bulletin of Acts, Orders and Regulations SB 1982 no. 11 (Decree Issuance of State-owned Land), as it reads after the amendment made therein of Bulletin of Acts, Orders and Regulations S.B. 1990 no. 3.

1.2 Terms not defined in Section 1.1 hereof, but which are defined elsewhere in this Agreement shall, unless otherwise specified or required by the context, have such defined meaning wherever used in this Agreement.

1.3 Capitalized terms shall have the meaning ascribed to them in Section 1.1 or as otherwise defined in this Agreement.

1.4 Unless otherwise specified or required by the context, the use of the singular form in this Agreement shall include a corresponding reference to the plural form and use of the masculine gender shall include a corresponding reference to the feminine and neuter genders.

Other grammatical variations and cognate expressions of any defined terms shall likewise be deemed to have a corresponding meaning.

1.5 A reference to a specified chapter, section, paragraph or other division shall, unless otherwise specified or required by the context, be construed as a reference to the relevant division of this Agreement.

1.6 The terms “hereby”, “herein”, “hereof”, “hereto” and “hereunder” and similar expressions refer to this Agreement and any supplemental Agreement hereto or amendments hereof.

1.7 A reference or apparent reference by name to any legislation in this Agreement shall, unless otherwise specified, be interpreted as a reference to the written law of the Republic of Suriname having the corresponding short title or name.

1.8 In this Agreement, a covenant or an undertaking to perform a specified act or to perform an act for the attainment of a specified objective shall be deemed to include a covenant or an undertaking, as applicable, not to perform or to omit to perform such act as would be inconsistent with ‘the performance of such first mentioned act or the attainment of such first mentioned objective.

1.9 Unless defined herein or unless otherwise indicated by the context, definitions of terms set forth in the Law as are relevant to the subject matter hereof shall apply in the interpretation of corresponding terms used in this Agreement.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

1.10 If the Venture is formed in accordance with this Agreement, all references to Surgold shall mean and include Surgold in its capacity as the Managing Partner (as defined in the Commanditaire Vennootschap Agreement) of the Venture, if the context so requires.

Chapter 2 NATURE OF AGREEMENT

2.1 Contractual Relationship with the Republic of Suriname

Within the framework of this Agreement the Republic of Suriname undertakes to ensure that the provisions and terms of this Agreement will remain effective for the duration thereof, for which the Agreement is to be characterized as a contractual relationship between a private party and a sovereign state.

Surgold shall by virtue of this Agreement complete the Exploration phase, and submit a Feasibility Study and the Merian ESIA, while the Republic of Suriname, subject to the provisions of this Agreement, will grant Surgold the Merian Right of Exploitation, and also provide for the right to develop and operate Mines within the Area of Interest.

2.2 Compliance with the Laws

During the term of this Agreement, Surgold shall conduct Operations in compliance with the Laws as set forth in Sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.2.

2.2.1 Surgold shall observe the Laws, including all terms and requirements of the Mining Act, which are in force as of the Effective Date.

2.2.2 Surgold shall, subject to the provisions of Section 2.2.1 and Section 15.5, also observe the Laws which come into force after the Effective Date.

2.2.3 Any dispute between Surgold, on the one hand, and the Republic of Suriname, on the other hand, as to the obligation of Surgold to comply with any Law, shall be resolved pursuant to Chapter 17 of this Agreement.

2.2.4 Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no Laws shall require Surgold to breach or otherwise violate its obligations to comply with the laws of the United States.

Chapter 3 PARTICIPATION

3.1 Participating Option

The Republic of Suriname shall have the option to appoint a Company Limited by Shares to participate in the Merian Gold Project up to at most twenty-five (25%) (the “Option”), as provided below.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

The Option can be exercised during a period of sixty days after the date of the granting of the Merian Right of Exploitation to Surgold by the Republic of Suriname, hereinafter, the Option period.

The Option shall be exercisable by written notice of the Republic of Suriname delivered to Surgold during Option period.

3.2 NV 2

NV 2 is the company limited by shares appointed by the Republic of Suriname to participate in the Merian Gold Project in exercising the Option.

3.3 The Venture

As of the Effective Date, Surgold shall execute and deliver the Venture Agreement, while the Republic of Suriname shall also cause the NV 2 to do the same.

The Venture Agreement will become effective as of the exercise of the Option by the Republic of Suriname, after which Surgold and NV 2 in accordance with the Venture Agreement may acquire by means of the Initial Contribution a Participating Interest in the Venture.

If NV 2 fails to pay its Initial Contribution within the time period set in the Venture Agreement, then the Venture is deemed to have never been effective.

3.4 Termination of the Option

The Option will terminate if the Republic of Suriname fails to exercise the Option within the Option term, and the designated grace periods, referred to hereinafter.

Upon the failure of the Republic of Suriname to exercise the Option, Surgold shall notify the Republic of Suriname that the Option threatens to lapse.

The Republic of Suriname shall have thirty (30) days, from the date of receipt of Surgold’s Notice, to yet exercise the Option.

In the absence of a response from the Republic of Suriname during such thirty (30) day period, Surgold shall send a second notice providing a final fifteen (15) day grace period.

After the grace period expires without exercise of the Option, as referred to in Section 3.1, the Option shall be legally terminated without any further action required by Surgold, and neither the Republic of Suriname nor the NV 2 shall be able to derive any rights under the provisions of this Chapter 3.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

Chapter 4 RIGHTS OF EXPLOITATION AND EXPLORATION

4.1 Granting of Merian Right of Exploitation

Upon the submission by Surgold of:

(a)

the Merian ESIA and approval thereof by the Republic of Suriname; which approval the Republic of Suriname shall promptly grant, if the Merian ESIA meets IFC’s General Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines and IFC’s Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Mining; and

(b)

the Merian Feasibility Study and approval thereof by the Republic of Suriname; which approval the Republic of Suriname shall promptly grant, if the Merian Feasibility Study meets the criteria stated in the definition of Feasibility Study in Section 1 of this Agreement; and

(c)

a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Parent Company approving Development of the Merian Gold Project, including Project Financing and the schedule for commencement of Development;

the Republic of Suriname shall grant the exclusive Merian Right of Exploitation to Surgold, so that Surgold shall have the exclusive right to Mining in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

The Merian Right of Exploitation shall include, without limitation, the consent of the Republic of Suriname to continue the construction and operations of Mines, processing plants and any related facilities required to carry out Operations or increase production capacity in accordance with this Agreement.

4.2 If the Republic of Suriname determines that the Merian ESIA or the Feasibility Study do not at least meet the standards stated in Section 4.1 under (a) and (b), respectively, the Republic of Suriname shall give Surgold written notice of such determination within thirty (30) days following submission thereof, stating the basis for its determination fittingly.

If the Republic of Suriname fails to make such notification within such thirty (30) day time period, then Surgold will send the Republic of Suriname a reminder in writing about the failure to send such notification.

The approval of the Merian ESIA or Merian Feasibility Study, as may be the case, shall be deemed to have been given if the Republic of Suriname fails to give such notice within such additional thirty (30) day period to be calculated as of the receipt of the reminder.

If the Republic of Suriname does indeed deliver such notice on time, Surgold will reply to the Republic of Suriname and attempt to satisfy any requirements that the Republic of Suriname deems not to have been met and which are included in the Republic of Suriname’s initial notice.

If Surgold disputes such determination, then Surgold and the Republic of Suriname shall appoint an expert to make such determination, in accordance with the procedures stated in Sections 4.4.1 through 4.4.3.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

In the case of determination with respect to the Feasibility Study, the expert must meet the qualifications stated in Section 4.4.1.

4.3 Commencement of Development

4.3.1 Following the issuance of the Merian Right of Exploitation, Surgold shall be required to commence Development taking into account the schedule referred to in Section 4.3.3 of this Agreement.

Provided, however that if some or all of the elements of the Feasibility Study have changed in such a way that commencement of Development is infeasible, or that continuation of Development activities are infeasible, Surgold shall notify the Republic of Suriname stating the reasons why it is required to delay or discontinue Development activities.

For that purpose Surgold shall provide a schedule to commence or recommence Development to the Republic of Suriname.

The Republic of Suriname shall then notify Surgold stating that: (i) it accepts the schedule or the proposed date for recommencement of Development, or (ii) it disagrees with the reasons presented by Surgold and rejects the schedule or the discontinuation of Development, in which case, subject to the provisions of Section 4.3.3, Surgold shall be in default unless Development commences or recommences within sixty (60) days from the date of the notice by the Republic of Suriname.

4.3.2 In the case of a dispute regarding the commencement or recommencement of Development, or regarding whether the standards stated in Section 4.1 under a and b for the Merian ESIA or Feasibility Study, respectively, have been met, then the Parties shall submit the dispute to an independent third party expert (or experts), in accordance with the procedure laid down in Section 4.4 of this Agreement.

This expert (these experts) will then determine if some or all of the elements of the Feasibility Study have changed in such a way that commencement or recommencement of Development is infeasible.

4.3.3 Surgold shall be required to commence Development no later than three (3) years, to be calculated as of the date of granting of the Merian Right of Exploitation; provided, however, that Surgold may delay the commencement of Development by any delay caused due to the infeasibility of the Development.

If Surgold, after the expiry of the third year (as extended as a consequence of the inability to commence Development due to its infeasibility) it will be in default, unless Surgold pays the sum of Two Million and Five Hundred thousand US Dollars (US$2,500,000) to the Republic of Suriname, for every additional year, within the first month of each year.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

In the event Surgold has not commenced Development after the sixth year Surgold, it will yet be in default.

4.4 Appointment of Third Party Expert

4.4.1 Within thirty (30) Business Days following Surgold’s providing written notice to the Republic of Suriname of its determination that commencement or recommencement of Development of the Merian Gold Project is infeasible, which notice shall include a reasonable explanation of the factors that have led Surgold to such determination, and which the Republic of Suriname disputes, Surgold and the Republic of Suriname shall agree upon the appointment of an independent third party expert who is a qualified member of a recognized professional organization as listed by the Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME) in the ‘Guide for Reporting Exploration Results, Mineral Resources, and Mineral Reserves’, of 2007 (or later version), and who shall have at least 20 years of experience with Development, Exploitation and Mining throughout the world.

In the event that the Parties are unable to agree upon one expert within such thirty (30) Business Days period, then each shall appoint an expert with such qualifications within the following five (5) Business Days.

In the event either Party fails to so appoint an expert on or before the day specified in the preceding sentence, the party appointed as the expert by one Party may appoint an expert to represent the Party having failed to appoint an expert within ten (10) Business Days after the expiration of such period.

The expert or experts appointed in either manner shall then proceed to request such reasonably applicable information, materials and data as is required from the Parties, which the Parties have to provide, so that the expert(s) is capable to arrive at a univocal determination as to the feasibility or infeasibility of commencing or recommencing Development.

The expert(s) shall be directed by the Parties to render a decision within sixty (60) days after his/her/their appointment.

In the event of his/her/their inability to reach a determination within sixty (60) days after appointment, then he/she/they shall select a third expert on or prior to the expiration of such sixty (60) day period (the “Arbitration Commencement Date”).

If such joint appointment is not made within sixty (60) days after the Arbitration Commencement Date, either party may request that the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) or its successor appoint a third expert having at least the credentials set forth above to render a determination as to the feasibility or infeasibility of commencing Development.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

4.4.2 The LCIA, or its successor, shall appoint the third expert within ten (10) days after request thereof is made by a Party hereto.

Within forty-five (45) days after his/ her appointment, the third expert shall render a determination as to the feasibility or infeasibility of commencing or recommencing Development.

The determination of the third expert, whether appointed by the experts appointed by the Parties or by the LCIA or its successor, shall be final.

4.4.3 If, for any reason whatsoever, a written decision of the experts appointed as provided herein, or the third expert, as the case may be, shall not be rendered within forty-five (45) days after the Arbitration Commencement Date, then at any time thereafter before such decision shall have been rendered, either Party may apply to the LCIA or its successor to determine the question in dispute consistent with the provisions of this Agreement.

The Parties agree to be bound by the determination of the LCIA.

4.4.4 Upon a determination by the expert(s) that it is infeasible for Surgold to commence or recommence Development, Surgold shall be entitled to delay commencement or recommencement of Development within the time limits described in Section 4.3.3.

4.4.5 Upon a determination by the expert(s) that it is feasible for Surgold to commence or recommence Development, Surgold shall be required to commence or recommence Development within sixty (60) days from the day Surgold is notified, as may be the case, provided that the time limits described in Section 4.3.3 shall apply, or be in default.

4.4.6 Should the arbitration process of the expert(s) take place during or extend beyond the time period when Surgold would be obligated to pay the sum of Two Million and Five Hundred thousand United States Dollars (US$2,500,000) thereafter for every additional year, no payment shall be due for the period while arbitration by the expert(s) is underway; provided, however, that if the resulting arbitration award is favorable to the Republic of Suriname, Surgold shall pay such fees in arrears.

4.5 New Rights of Exploitation

If Surgold’s Exploration activities conducted within any Right of Exploration held prior to and as of the Effective Date, or conducted within any new Right of Exploration that may be acquired from time to time after the Effective Date per the provisions of Section 4.6, result in new gold discoveries partially or wholly within the Area of Interest, Surgold may apply to convert such Rights of Exploration to new Rights of Exploitation that will be subject to the terms of this Agreement, with the exception of the provision of Section 4.3, Commencement of Development, which shall not apply.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

This application should meet the requirements of Article 30 Paragraph 2 of the Mining Act, and should be furthermore accompanied by an ESIA of the area involved and the approval thereof in accordance with Sections 4.1 under (a) and 4.2.

The requirements laid down in Sections 4.1 under (b) and (c) are not applicable to such application.

The Republic of Suriname shall not withhold its approval to such application and shall grant a new Right of Exploitation to Surgold by Order of the aforementioned Minister, as referred to in Article 6 Paragraph 3 of the Mining Act.

Now that such new Rights of Exploitation are subject to the provisions of this Agreement, with the exclusion of Section 4.3, the Option to participate, referred to in Article 32 Paragraph 1 of the Mining Act is not applicable.

4.6 New Rights of Exploration

The following conditions will apply for the acquisition of new Rights of Exploration by Surgold:

(a)

Surgold shall have the right to apply for new Rights of Exploration partially or wholly within the Area of Interest, and the Republic of Suriname shall promptly grant such rights to Surgold but no later than ninety (90) days following submission of such application; provided, however, that requested parcel of land is not covered by a valid right of exploration or right of exploitation for gold and other Minerals held by a third party and provided further that Surgold’s application fulfills the requirements for obtaining such rights established by the Mining Act.

(b)

In the event that a third party applies for a right of exploration on land not already covered by a Right of Exploration or Right of Exploitation, Surgold shall have a priority rights on that area of land. In such case, the Minister of Natural Resources shall promptly notify Surgold in writing stating: (a) the location and coordinates of the land applied for by such third party; and (b) the proposed program and budget which must be included with any such third party application. Surgold shall have priority rights for a period of eight (8) months from the day of the receipt by Surgold of such notification. If Surgold does not elect to apply for such right of exploration within such eight (8) month period, the Minister of Natural Resources shall be entitled to grant such parcel of land to the third party under the terms and conditions of the application. If Surgold elects to exercise its priority rights, the Minister of Natural Resources shall approve Surgold’s application and shall grant the rights of exploration to Surgold but no later than ninety (90) days following submission of such application; provided that Surgold’s application fulfills the requirements for obtaining a right of exploration, as established by the Mining Act, and its proposed program and budget matches the spend requirement of the third party’s application including a work program and budget that is at least comparable to the one submitted by the third party. To the extent that a third party applies for a right of exploration and subsequently amends its application during Surgold’s eight (8) months priority rights period, Surgold shall have eight (8) months from the date of such amended application to exercise its priority rights.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

(c)

Surgold may also acquire pre-existing rights of exploration for gold and other Minerals from its Affiliates or from third parties, in which case it shall request the Minister of Natural Resources approval to transfer such right.

The Minister of Natural Resources shall promptly grant such approval, and in any case no later than thirty (30) days following the request.

If Surgold acquires a Right of Exploration for gold and other Minerals from a third party, Surgold may request and the Minister of Natural Resources shall grant, an additional three (3) year exploration period upon the expiration of the term of the acquired right.

Furthermore Surgold shall have the right to apply for two consecutive two-year extensions thereafter.

The Minister of Natural Resources shall promptly grant such extensions, and in any case no later than ninety (90) days following submission of such applications; provided, however, that Surgold applications for extension fulfil the requirements established in the Mining Act.

(d)

Surgold may also acquire pre-existing rights of exploitation for gold and other Minerals from third parties, in which case it shall have the right to request approval to transfer to the Minister of Natural Resources together with a reapplication of a new Right of Exploration over the land covered by the acquired right of exploitation for gold and other Minerals.

The Minister of Natural Resources shall swiftly grant such substituting rights to Surgold, and in any case no later than ninety (90) days following submission of such application; provided, however, that Surgold applications fulfil the requirements established in the Mining Act.

(e)

If and when Surgold makes a discovery within any Right of Exploration, it shall have the right on the basis thereof to apply for a Right of Exploitation, and the Republic of Suriname shall grant such right in accordance with the provisions in Section 4.5.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

(f)

The Republic of Suriname confirms to Surgold that on the day of signing this Agreement there are still pieces of land that are free from any Right of Exploration or any Right of Exploitation within the Area of Interest, as shown in the overviewmap attached to this Agreement as Attachment XIII. Parties declare expressly that, in the case present third parties owners do not strictly fulfil there obligation under and pusuant to the Mining Act, several pieces of land can become free from any Right of Exploration or any Right of Exploitation during the term of this Agreement. Surgold’s Right of First Refusal, reffered to in Article 4.6 (b), is in that case also applicable to these pieces of land.

The Republic of Suriname states and confirms that with regard to the existing rights of exploration for gold and other Minerals of third parties it will conscientiously observe the provisions of the Mining Act, in particular the provisions relating to the extension, reduction and termination of these rights as well as to the granting of the successive rights of exploitation for gold and other Minerals.

The foregoing entails that only within the Area of Interest rights of exploration and rights of exploitation for gold and other Minerals that are in good standing belonging to third parties shall be maintained by the Republic of Suriname.

Chapter 5 USE OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATE-OWNED LANDS

5.1

Use of Project Lands

Surgold shall have the right to make use of, construct, improve and maintain any roads or waterways within Project Lands to the extent necessary to accomplish Project purposes

Beyond the Project Lands, Surgold shall have the right to make use of, improve and, maintain, and upon the written approval of the Republic of Suriname shall have the right to construct roads, railroads or waterways to the extent necessary to accomplish Project purposes.

5.2

Quarries

Surgold shall have the exclusive right to make use of quarries for building materials located within Project Lands to the extent necessary to accomplish Project purposes.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

5.3 Water

Surgold shall be allowed to deviate, store, pump for dewatering purposes and to otherwise use freshwater from surface and underground sources located on the Project Lands for Project purposes, all this in accordance with the ESIA as applicable.

Surgold shall have the right to use other available water sources on or in the vicinity of the Project Lands as stipulated in the ESIA as applicable.

5.4 Timber

In accordance with the Mining Act and under the provisions thereof, Surgold shall have the right to use and process standing, fallen and uprooted timber located within Project Lands that require to be cleared for Development.

5.5 Use of State-owned Land

In accordance with the Issuance Domain Land Law and under the provisions thereof, Surgold shall have the right to make use of any and all Domain Land to the extent necessary to accomplish Project purposes.

5.6 Local Circumstances

Surgold is bound to take the living circumstances of the local communities into account while implementing its rights, as referred to in Sections 5.1 through 5.5.

5.7 Granting of other rights

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Republic of Suriname reserves the right, without liability for any damages, to grant to qualified applicants within the Area of Interest rights of exploration and exploitation for oil, gas, coal and other hydrocarbons and fissionable materials, and rights-of-way for pipelines, power, telephone, telegraph and waterlines, on or in respect of the Project Lands.

Further, the Republic of Suriname shall retain the right to grant timber and other concessions (except with respect to gold and other metallic minerals and/or building materials) within Project Lands.

Upon the granting of such rights of exploration or exploitation or any such concessions, the Republic of Suriname shall promptly notify Surgold of such intentions and the applicant shall be required to make appropriate arrangements, including compensation to Surgold, to ensure that its operations and installation shall not unduly interfere with or result in any additional cost to the Operations.

5.8 Assistance

The Republic of Suriname shall assist Surgold in obtaining the benefit of the rights set forth in this Section 5.1 up to and including Section 5.5.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

5.9 Porknockers

The Republic of Suriname shall act swiftly and decisively in accordance with Laws to remove any and all illegal mining activities that obstruct the advancement of Exploration, Development and Mining activities under any Right of Exploration, any Right of Exploitation of Surgold, or any right of exploration of a Surgold Affiliate, and will provide the necessary safeguards that will allow Surgold’s or Surgold’s Affiliates exploration and Development activities to advance uninterrupted.

Chapter 6 EXECUTION OF PROJECT OPERATIONS

6.1 Conduct of Operations

Surgold shall conduct Operations in a good workmanlike and responsible manner in accordance with best Mining practice using standards generally applicable in the North American gold mining industry and furthermore in accordance with the Feasibility Study, each ESIA and, to the extent set forth in Section 2.2 of this Agreement, and the Mining Act.

6.2 Use of Local Products and Services

Surgold shall give preference, to the maximum extent compatible with efficient and economic Operations, to products and services produced, distributed and offered in Suriname, provided these are offered at competitive price, quality and other commercial terms, conditions and are readily available on a dependable basis as competing products and services that could be obtained elsewhere.

Without prejudice to the rights granted to Surgold under Sections 8, 9 and 10 hereof, Surgold shall give preference to Surinamese construction enterprises and to the use of buildings which can be constructed by using materials and skills available in Suriname, to the employment of Surinamese subcontractors for road construction and transportation and to the purchase of household products and furniture in Suriname.

Surgold shall also require its contractors and their subcontractors to follow these policies.

6.2.1 Exceptions

The Republic of Suriname acknowledges that in order to achieve efficiencies and reduced cost, Surgold will rely upon the established alliances and working relationships of Surgold’s members and their Affiliates, including those listed under Attachment VIII

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

6.2.2 Reporting

Within ninety (90) days from the end of each calendar year, Surgold must submit a report to the Republic of Suriname, in which it lists (a) the relative percentages of goods purchased and services obtained in Suriname and (b) the relative percentages of goods and services obtained from abroad and imported into Suriname by Surgold, and (c) of the measures taken to increase the share of Surinamese goods and services in the Project.

The report will show the performance of Surgold in connection with its contribution to the economic development of Suriname over the years.

Surgold shall constantly strive to improve such performance.

6.2.3 Publication

During Development Surgold will make available publicly and promptly, by means of a Project website and notification in local newspaper in Suriname, the requirements for products and services that are expected to be obtained locally together with the specifications and qualifications for providing such products and services.

6.3 Road Maintenance

Surgold shall be allowed to use existing roads, but shall only be obligated to repair (or pay the cost of repair for) damages caused by their use of roads, bridges and other transportation facilities and shall contribute to the cost of regular maintenance of any roads on which they are a principal user, in an amount proportionate to their damage to said roads.

6.4 Landing Strips

Subject to compliance with applicable Laws as set forth in Section 2.2, Surgold shall be entitled to construct, maintain and operate a landing strip for aircraft within or in the vicinity of the Project.

6.5 Security Personnel

Surgold shall be entitled to employ, train and maintain armed security personnel in order to ensure the security of persons and property on Project Lands, provided that Surgold shall comply with all Laws relating thereto, and provided further that such security personnel shall be of Surinamese nationality.

In addition, Surgold shall comply with the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights.

The Republic of Suriname shall assist Surgold in the implementation of its security program and, in particular, shall facilitate the obtaining of all necessary permits for such purposes under the appropriate regulations.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

6.6 Books and Records

Surgold shall maintain sound internal controls and keep accurate books and records, fully in accordance with GAAP, and in English, However, if a Law is passed after the Effective Date requiring businesses operating in Suriname to maintain their books and records in accordance with IFRS, or if the Parent Company determines that it shall maintain the books and records in accordance with IFRS, then Surgold will be obligated to keep its books and records in accordance with IFRS. In case a Law comes into force as referred to above, the Republic of Suriname shall offer a reasonable time period to Surgold to keep its books and records in accordance with IFRS.

6.7 Inspections

6.7.1 Such books and records may be inspected by the Republic of Suriname or its designated agents at its own costs at all reasonable times.

The Republic of Suriname or its designated agents may make copies, at the sole cost of the Republic of Suriname, of such books and records as are reasonably necessary to perform the audit function, provided, however, that the Republic of Suriname shall maintain the confidentiality of such books and records at all times and shall reveal the books and records only in accordance with the Law.

6.7.2 The Republic of Suriname and their designated agents shall have the right to inspect all improvements and facilities on Project Lands in connection with extraction, sampling, treating or transporting Minerals, at all reasonable times, upon reasonable notice, and with minimum interference to the Operations, and Surgold shall cooperate in such inspections and make competent personnel available to explain their activities and Operations to the Republic of Suriname.

The Republic of Suriname’s exercise of its rights to inspection pursuant to this Section shall be subject to the condition that such inspections be conducted by the Republic of Suriname at its sole risk and expense.

And in the event any damages result from its exercise of its right of inspection under this Section, the Republic of Suriname shall indemnify Surgold and the Venture therefor; provided, however, if any injury or damage is caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Surgold, then Surgold, shall be liable.

6.8 Power

Surgold acknowledges that the Republic of Suriname, through N.V. Energiebedrijven Suriname (hereinafter, EBS), its wholly owned utility company, has the exclusive right for power generation, transmission and distribution and purchase of power for Suriname.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

Surgold acknowledges further that it will rely on thermal power for Operations and if power from the Afobaka Hydroelectric facility (hereinafter, Hydro Power) is used, it will be strictly treated as thermal power (based on a ‘hydro for thermal power swap’ principle).

Therefore given the above:

(a)

Surgold is required to deal with EBS for the transmission and distribution of power;

(b)

The Republic of Suriname will facilitate Surgold’s obtaining its power requirements at competitive pricing, with the exception of Hydro Power, independent of other project qualifying procedures, such as permitting and financing;

(c)

in the case Surgold or the Venture wishes to self-generate power, the Republic of Suriname will expedite and facilitate required permits, if any, provided Surgold meets stated and reasonable technical and knowledge criteria.

In addition Surgold power generation plant(s) must meet international environmental, safety and pollution control standards as per the approved EISA.

Surgold shall have the right to use its self-generated power at any and all of its sites where it conducts Operations and at which it desires to use such power;

(d)

Sources other than thermal, excluding hydro power, can be developed by Surgold and other parties under the condition that the Republic of Suriname will need to approve such projects.

The Republic of Suriname will not unduly, delay, condition or withhold approval of the development of such projects;

(e)

In the case Surgold self-generates power in excess of its own requirements and appropriate connections to the electrical grid of Suriname are incorporated in the design, sales of that excess power will be negotiated with EBS;

(f)

In the case a third party supplies excess power to Surgold using transmission facilities dedicated for the Project, the design of such facilities will be coordinated with EBS in order to facilitate possible multiple use and cooperative installation and operation

Said power transmission will not constitute a sale of power.

6.9 Health and Safety

Throughout Operations, Surgold shall practice modern health and safety procedures and precautions including regular safety training for its employees and contractors in accordance with the IFC’s General Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines and the IFC’s Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Mining.

6.10 Waste Rocks and other Building Materials

Surgold shall be entitled to move and use any waste rocks and other building materials produced from the Operations to all locations or installations located within the Area of Interest.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

Chapter 7 INVESTMENT IN SURINAME

7.1 Bank Accounts in Suriname

The Republic of Suriname shall permit Surgold to open and hold without any restrictions bank accounts denominated in foreign currency in Suriname.

7.2 Transactions in Gold and Other Minerals

The Republic of Suriname hereby agrees that Surgold shall be entitled to borrow, lend, sell, purchase and otherwise transact gold and other Minerals in connection with the financing of its Operations or in connection with its day-to-day Operations and/or in the ordinary course of its business.

7.3 Deposits and Transfers

Surgold shall be entitled to open and operate in its name, with any bank outside the territory of Suriname, bank accounts and other like credit, deposit or banking arrangements in any unit of currency (including but not limited to the U.S. Dollar), and make deposits to and payments from these accounts, in accordance with the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Regulations 1947.

To the extent that any foreign exchange regulations of Suriname by its terms apply to Surgold, such regulations shall be deemed not to apply and shall not be enforced against Surgold, with respect to all deposits into and all transfers from its local and foreign currency accounts, including such as, but not limited to:

(a)

funds invested or to be invested in Surgold in connection with the conduct of its Operations;

(b)

proceeds from the sale of Minerals by Surgold;

(c)

capital and capital proceeds, including dividends and profits;

(d)

any other gains or revenues;

(e)

any transfer of funds held in Suriname from time to time and not immediately required by Surgold for the conduct of its Operations; and

(f)

the payment of principal and interest on any funds borrowed by or on behalf of Surgold.

7.4 Currency Exchange

Suriname Dollars shall be purchased by Surgold from the Central Bank of Suriname, and commercial banks using U.S. Dollars.

And the conversion rate applicable for such transactions shall be the market rate then available for the conversion of U.S. Dollars into Suriname Dollars.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

Likewise, U.S. Dollars shall be purchased by Surgold from the Centrale Bank of Suriname and commercial banks using Surinamese Dollars, and the conversion rate applicable for such transactions shall be the market rate then available for the conversion of Surinamese Dollars into U.S. Dollars.

The Republic of Suriname hereby covenants the enactment or adoption of new Laws or policies or the amendment or repeal of existing Laws or policies relating to the conversion of Suriname Dollars into U.S. Dollars or vice versa shall not have the effect of preventing Surgold from converting U.S. Dollars into Suriname Dollars or vice versa at a rate of exchange that accurately reflects the relative international market values of such currencies.

7.5 Gold sales

Surgold shall be entitled (a) to export unrefined gold mined from the Project to established refining facilities located outside the territory of Suriname, at the choice of Surgold, as long as such refining facilities are on the Accredited Refiners list prepared by the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), COMEX Division Commodity Exchange, Inc. or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) or the Hong Kong Mercantile Exchange (HKMEX), and (b) subject to the terms of the Venture Agreement to freely retain, deposit, dispose of pursuant to spot sales, spot deferred sales, forward sales, gold loan repayments and other transactions or otherwise deal with all refined gold available as it shall consider appropriate.

The foregoing shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 20 of this Agreement.

7.6 Use of Refinery Plant

If a commercial refinery for gold or other Minerals is put into operation in Suriname, Surgold will give priority consideration to this refinery for Project purposes, if such refinery meets the following criteria:

(a)

The economic and material terms of the Republic of Suriname’s refining agreement are equal to or better than the economic and material terms of Surgold’s existing refining agreement, or other refining agreements made available to Surgold from other gold refineries in the market.

(b)

Material terms would include but are not limited to: gold and silver accountabilities, refining charges, transportation, metal return timing, form and location of refined metal return, and financing costs.

(c)

The refinery must be certified by the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), COMEX Division Commodity Exchange, Inc., the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) or the Hong Kong Mercantile Exchange (HKMEX)and must also comply with the “LBMA Responsible Gold Guidance”, included in Attachment XIV that can be adjusted over time.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

(d)

The refinery must meet strict environmental standards, auditable by Surgold, or its nominated agents, which are no less stringent than the standards of Surgold’s existing refinery or refineries made available to Surgold in the market

And furthermore:

(i)

If Surgold is operating under an existing refining agreement, Surgold will be allowed to perform under the existing refining agreement until the term thereof expires, although as of the date of this Agreement, Surgold does not have a current refining agreement in place.

(ii)

A maximum of seventy five percent (75%) of Surgold’s doré production will be required to be refined by this refinery.

Surgold will be allowed to refine the remaining twenty five percent (25%) at a refinery of Surgold’s choosing, and under refining terms agreed to by Surgold.

7.7 Government Approvals

Subject to the provisions of Chapter 2, the Republic of Suriname hereby undertakes to cause Surgold, as appropriate, to receive without delay all such specific authorizations and exemptions from competent authorities having jurisdiction over the matters described in this Chapter 7 as are necessary or desirable to give effect to the matters described, including the following:

(a)

Approval(s) from authorized government institutions or agencies in charge of the foreign exchange control exempting Surgold from the application of such sections of such regulations as may become necessary for such purposes; and

(b)

An approval or other instrument from authorized government institutions or agencies in charge of the appropriate banking regulations authorizing the execution of those transactions and other acts contemplated hereunder which are or may be governed by such regulations.

Chapter 8 IMPORTING PROPERTY INTO SURINAME

8.1 Exemptions

Subject to the provisions of Section 6.2 and except what is provided under Section 8.1.1 below, during Operations, Surgold shall be permitted to import free of customs, duty, taxes or any charges regarding the importation of capital equipment, all equipment, work vehicles, supplies, fuels, or other materials of whatever nature necessary without further authorization provided that Surgold complies with administrative process required by the Laws.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

The exemptions described herein shall not apply to items listed in Attachment IX hereto.

8.1.1 Surgold and local and expatriate contractors thereof shall pay to the Republic of Suriname a Statistic Fee of 1 percent (1%) and a Consent Fee of 1.5 percent (1.5%) of the value of goods imported for all items imported pursuant to Section 8.1 and Section 8.2; provided, however, that the maximum aggregate total of the Statistic Fee and the Consent Fee so paid or accrued shall not exceed Three Hundred Thousand Dollars (US$300,000) in any twelve-month period.

8.1.2 Payments made by Surgold pursuant to Sections 8.1.1 are deductible for the levying income tax.

8.2 Contractor’s Imports

Without prejudice to Section 6.2 and except as specified in this Chapter 8, applies to the Operations that (a) Surgold, acting for the account of local or foreign contractors retained for Project purposes; and (b) local or foreign contractors so hired by Surgold, shall be entitled to import free of import duties, excises, taxes or other charges regarding the importation of capital equipment, all equipment required for Development and Mining, work vehicles, supplies, fuels or other materials of whatever nature necessary in their judgement without further authorization, provided that Surgold complies with administrative process required by Laws.

The exemptions described herein shall not apply to items listed in Attachment IX hereto.

8.3 Surgold’s Guarantee

Upon termination of its contract with Surgold, plus a reasonable term for de-mobilization, each foreign or local contractor that has imported items pursuant to Section 8.2, or for whom Surgold is importing items pursuant to Section 8.2, shall obtain a certificate of consumption for re-export of such item from the customs officials, or for payment of import duties and taxes due with respect to such importation of such items, pursuant to this Agreement.

Surgold shall make good on any failure by an independent contractor (in connection with the Project) to perform its obligation to pay import duties, excises, taxes or other like charges in the circumstances contemplated by this Section 8.3, and fulfil such obligation as if it were its own obligation.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

8.4 Sale of Imported Property

In the event of a sale of imported property within Suriname by Surgold to a person other than the Republic of Suriname hereunder, Surgold shall be liable to pay customs and import duties and taxes on such property brought into Suriname under an exemption provided by this Agreement.

The import duties, excises, taxes or other charges payable shall be calculated on the appraised value of such goods on the sales date, to be determined by the Inspector of Import Duties and Excises.

8.5 Re-export

On goods imported into Suriname pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter 8, which Surgold intends to re-export, the Republic of Suriname shall have an option right to purchase the goods, and more in particular at ‘book value’ of the goods.

In this respect, Surgold will offer the property for sale to the Republic of Suriname, and give the Republic of Suriname a sixty (60) day term to accept or refuse the offer.

In case there is no response from the Republic of Suriname after such sixty (60) day period, Surgold shall be entitled to re-export the property on the same terms and with the same privileges and exemptions as are set forth in this Chapter 8, but subject, in the case of a sale upon termination of this Agreement, to the provisions of Chapter 18.

The term ‘book value’ above for the purposes of this Section will be the value at the moment of transfer, derived from the value of the subject good on the last fiscal balance sheet of Surgold with respect to its Participating Interest in the Venture, as applicable.

8.6 Authorizations

Without prejudice to the provisions of Chapter 2 of this Agreement, the Republic of Suriname hereby undertakes to cause Surgold to promptly receive all such specific authorizations and exemptions from competent authorities having jurisdiction over the matters described in this Chapter 8 as are necessary to give effect to the matters described herein.

The foregoing is subject to the obligation of Surgold to follow the administrative procedures in respect thereof.

Chapter 9 IMMIGRATION AND EXPATRIATE PERSONNEL

9.1 Expatriate Employees

Surgold and its contractors, without prejudice to Section 10.1 of this Agreement, shall be entitled to employ, by way of direct employment or secondment from a foreign entity, such persons who are not residents of the Republic of Suriname (the “Expatriate Employees”), to work in Suriname for the Project and related purposes.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

The Republic of Suriname shall permit such Expatriate Employees and their dependants (together the “Expatriates”), as defined in the Aliens Act 1991, to immigrate for such periods as Surgold or its contractors shall deem necessary.

9.2 Compliance with the provisions of the Aliens Act 1991 and Law on Aliens’ Work Permit

Surgold shall comply with the terms of the Aliens Act 1991 with respect to the Expatriate Employees and the immigration of Expatriates.

Subject to the provisions of Chapter 2, the Republic of Suriname shall perform all such acts within its powers and shall cause all such other acts to be performed which may be necessary or desirable to facilitate the employment and immigration of Expatriate Employees and employees of its contractors, as contemplated in this Chapter 9, as well as for the processing of applications for visas, authorizations for short stays, residency permits and work permits.

9.2.1 Visa

Expatriates will be allowed to travel to the Republic of Suriname and obtain a “Visa on Arrival” at the International Airport.

9.2.2 Residency and Work Permits

Expatriates that wish to apply for a residency permit, in accordance with terms and conditions of the Aliens Act 1991, and a work permit, in accordance with the Act on Aliens Work Permit, shall file an application for this purposes within 14 Business Days after their arrival in the Republic of Suriname.

The residency and work permit will be issued for a period of at least 3 years or the period equal to the employment contract.

9.3 Expatriate compliance with Laws

Surgold shall ensure that Expatriate Employees comply with all applicable Laws, that they respect the national heritage and customs and that they not engage in any activities contravening the Law.

The Parties also agree that contractual provisions allowing for the dismissal of Expatriate Employees for violation of these Laws shall be deemed sufficient to meet Surgold’s obligations pursuant to this Article, without prejudice to the criminal and civil liability of such employees and without prejudice to the provisions of Sections 15.2 under (a) and (b) hereof.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

Chapter 10 LABOR MATTERS AND TRAINING

10.1 Local employment

Surgold shall give preference to the employment of persons of Surinamese nationality at all levels of the Operations to the extent that such persons are available, qualified and equally suitable for such employment.

However, Surgold shall be free to appoint as members of its senior management team individuals who, in Surgold’s opinion are the best qualified, regardless of country of origin.

10.2 Hiring of personnel

Subject to all other provisions of this Article 10, the selection and hiring of personnel for Project purposes shall be within the absolute and exclusive discretion of Surgold.

Surgold shall consult with the appropriate government authorities with a view to determining the availability of qualified and suitable Surinamese nationals for employment in the Project but shall not be bound by any recommendations of said authorities

10.3 Training Program

Prior to the Commencement of Commercial Production, Surgold shall prepare a detailed training program for Project purposes with a view to ensuring the development of suitable and qualified Surinamese personnel at all levels of its Operations (hereinafter the “Training Program”).

The Training Program may include training in such skills as production, maintenance, finance, human resources and management, and shall provide the knowledge to sample, drill, assay, process and extract Minerals

This can be effected through training courses, on-the-job training, scholarships for higher and academic education and, if necessary, training at premises and operations outside the Republic of Suriname, provided that Surgold shall collaborate with the Republic of Suriname as far as practicable to ensure that all residents of Suriname trained overseas pursuant to the Training Program return to work in Suriname.

Surgold shall enlist the participation and cooperation of the Republic of Suriname and institutions such as the Anton de Kom University of Suriname in preparing and implementing the Training Program.

In addition, subject to approval by Surgold, the Republic of Suriname and GMD will have the right to have a limited number of technologists trained by Surgold to learn these skills.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

10.4 Timetable

The goal of the Training Program shall be to achieve the following levels of employment of citizens of Suriname in the categories of employment and within the time periods after the Commencement of Commercial Production as are stipulated below:


	Category of employment
Time period	Unskilled			Skilled			Clerical			Professional			Management
End of year 3		100	%		75	%		75	%		40	%		20	%
End of year 5		100	%		80	%		100	%		70	%		60	%
End of year 7		100	%		85	%		100	%		80	%		70	%
End of year 10		100	%		90	%		100	%		80	%		70	%

Surgold shall make its best reasonable efforts to meet the timetable set forth above, however, if Surgold is unable to find personnel in Suriname to meet the hiring objectives set forth herein, Surgold shall be entitled to employ Expatriate Employees which are not residents of a CARICOM State, as it deems necessary and desirable, for Project purposes.

Subject to the foregoing, Surgold shall generally be entitled to have recourse to such mix of Expatriate Employees and Surinamese personnel as is required in Surgold’s judgment for efficient operation of the mines.

10.5 Reporting

Surgold shall, within 90 days after the expiry of each calendar year, file with the GMD and the Ministry of Labor Technology and Environment, a report indicating progress achieved in the employment of citizens of Suriname for Project purposes, including, if the goals described in Section 10.4 hereof are not met, a description of positions not filled by citizens of Suriname, a description of the procedures employed for seeking out available, suitable and qualified citizens of Suriname to fill such positions and an assessment of the success or progress achieved by the Training Program with a view to filling such positions.

10.6 Applicable Law

Labor relations between Surgold and its local employees in Suriname shall be subject to the Laws relating to labor relations.

Labor relations between Surgold and its Expatriates Employees in Suriname shall not be subject to the Laws, but to the choice of law mentioned in the respective employment contract provided, however that if said employment contract does not specify the choice of law, Surinamese Laws are applicable.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

10.8 Shutdown

When permanent shutdown of a Mine is anticipated, Surgold shall inform the Republic of Suriname at least one (1) year before the expected closure date.

Chapter 11 TAXATION

11.1 Currency

For purposes of taxation, Surgold shall maintain all its books and records in U.S. Dollars.

All taxes payable by Surgold shall be paid in U.S. Dollars.

11.2 Corporate Income Tax

11.2.1 Surgold shall meet its annual corporate income tax obligations in accordance with the Income Tax 1922, which is fully applicable to Surgold, unless specific provisions under this Agreement apply.

11.2.2 The Project qualifies as a permanent establishment for the levying of corporate income tax as determined in the Income Tax 1922.

Therefore, the Annual Profit derived from the Project by Surgold is taxable for the levying of income tax.

The expenses incurred in relation to the execution of the Project are deductible for the levying of corporate income tax, unless excluded by the Income Tax 1922.

11.2.3 The Annual Profit shall be calculated in accordance with sound business practice as intended in the Income Tax 1922, taking into account a consistent conduct which is independent of the expected results and which can only be changed if special circumstances justify this.

11.2.4 Surgold pursuant to the Income Tax 1922 should meet its annual corporate income tax obligations by filing a provisional and a final corporate income tax return with payment of the corporate income tax due.

A dated and signed provisional profit and loss account must be attached to the provisional corporate income tax return with an approximation of the Annual Net Taxable Income of the previous year.

The income tax due according to this return should, however, be at least equal to the income tax due based on the final income tax return, which should have been submitted according to the Income Tax 1922.

The final income tax return must consist of a dated and signed copy of the balance sheet, profit and loss account and the necessary explanatory notes.

11.2.5 Before the Commencement of Commercial Production, Surgold should file the opening balance sheet with the Inspector of Direct Taxes together with a specification of the costs incurred in relation to the execution of the Project until the moment of Commencement of Commercial Production.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

11.2.6 During the term of the Agreement Surgold shall pay the Republic of Suriname corporate income tax at the rate of thirty six percent (36%) due over the Annual Profit.

Such rate shall not be changed upward or downward, as a result of the enactment of any future Law.

11.3 Withholding Tax on Service Fees

11.3.1 A withholding tax of fifteen percent (15%) will be due over Service Fees as of the Commencement of Commercial Production.

This withholding tax will be applicable to Surgold and any other company associated with the Project to the extent that the underlying Service Fees are deducted for the levying of corporate income tax by Surgold or another company associated with the Project.

In connection with the levying of withholding tax Surgold and any other companies associated with the Project will be responsible for withholding and paying their own withholding tax and will not be collectively or severally liable for the withholding tax obligations of any other company associated with the Project.

11.3.2 The withholding tax shall be due on the Service Fees that were incurred over the period of one month. The payment of the withholding tax due must take place no later than the sixteenth (16 ^th ) of the month following the month in which Service Fees are incurred.

A reconciliation of withholding tax on Service Fees will be performed on an (calendar) annual basis.

11.4 Loss Carry Forward

Pursuant to the Income Tax 1922, Surgold will be entitled to carry forward net operating losses arising from its first three (3) financial or calendar years of the execution of the Project for an indefinite period of time to be set off against future Profits.

After the third (3 ^th ) financial or calendar year, Surgold shall be entitled to carry losses for a maximum period of fifteen (15) financial or calendar years to be set off against future Profits.

Such losses will be settled by Surgold in a manner that the losses incurred in earlier financial or calendar years shall be settled before losses incurred in later financial or calendar years.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

The first three (3) financial or calendar years of the Project cover the period 2004 up to and including 2006.

11.5 Value Added Tax (VAT)

Surgold will be exempt from VAT when procuring imported or locally taxable goods and services as intended in the VAT Law 1997.

The Republic of Suriname shall cause the Inspector of VAT will provide the necessary written confirmation of the waiver.

11.6 Personal lncome Tax

11.6.1 Surgold’s Expatriate Employees as defined in Section 9.1 above, and the Expatriate Employees of Surgold’s contractors are subject to personal income tax.

Their wage costs are deductible for the levying of income tax.

11.6.2 The Income Tax 1922 is fully applicable to Surgold’s Expatriate Employees and the Expatriate Employees of Surgold’s expatriate contractors, unless specific provisions under this Agreement apply.

11.7 Wage Tax

11.7.1 The Project qualifies as a permanent establishment for the levying of wage tax as determined in the Wage Tax Act.

Therefore, Surgold has a withholding liability for the levying of wage tax on the regular wage payments, as defined in Attachment XI, to its Expatriate Employees and resident employees.

Wage tax should be withheld by Surgold at the applicable tax rate under the Wage Tax Act.

Subsequently, Surgold should make the wage tax payments to the Collector of Direct Taxes with the filing of a wage tax return over the wage period involved.

In addition to the withholding liability for wage tax purposes, a withholding liability also exists for Surgold with regard to the premium ‘Algemeen Oudedagsvoorzieningsfonds’ (hereinafter, premium AOV) according to the Wet Algemeen Oudedagsvoorzieningsfonds, but only on wage payments to resident employees.

Premium AOV should be withheld by Surgold at the applicable rate under the “Wet Algemeen Oudedagsvoorzieningsfonds”.

The premium AOV payments to the Collector of Direct Taxes must take place together with the wage tax payments and with the filing of the wage tax return.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

11.7.2 The appointment letter of the Expatriate Employees shall pursuant to the Wage Tax Act be part of Surgold’s books and records in Suriname and be made available to the Inspector of Direct Taxes upon request.

The appointment letter should contain among other things the working period in Suriname and the remuneration scheme.

The different parts of the remuneration scheme, such as regular salary, bonus, foreign service premium, hardship allowance, housing allowance and company car should be specified in the appointment letter.

11.8 Registration with the Inspection of Direct Taxes

After Commencement of Commercial Production, Surgold shall register with the Inspection of Direct Taxes Affiliates and expatriate contractors who intend to perform work in Suriname for the benefit of the Project.

Such registration shall be required before commencement of work in Suriname.

11.9 Exemptions

In addition to what is described in Chapter 8 and elsewhere in this Chapter 11 of this Agreement, the Republic of Suriname exempts Surgold and its Expatriate Employees from paying all other taxes, duties and like charges regarding or resulting from activities or participation in activities by virtue of this Agreement.

11.10 No Effect of Other Tax Laws

The Republic of Suriname hereby represents and warrants that no Law presently in force would, by its terms, has the effect of imposing a direct or indirect tax on Surgold, its successors in interest, or any of their respective Affiliates

(a)

by reason of their being a Party to the Agreement, or

(b)

by reason of being a beneficiary of any exemption, or

(c)

being in connection with any matter contemplated in this Agreement.

To the extent that any provisions contained therein such Law would apply to Surgold or any of its Affiliates, such Law shall be deemed not to apply and shall not be enforced against Surgold or its Affiliates.

The Republic of Suriname hereby covenants and undertakes that, in the event of the imposition of any new or additional tax, through the enactment of any new Law or the enactment of any amendment to any tax Law, which imposition or change in rules for calculating same would result in an increase in the amount of taxes payable by Surgold, the Republic of Suriname shall relieve Surgold from the obligation to make such increased payment, and such relief shall be in an amount equal to the amount of the increased payment that would otherwise be required to be paid pursuant to such new or additional tax.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

11.12 Disputes

Should a dispute arise in connection with any matter referred to in this Chapter 11 or in connection with the application of any provision of any tax Law to Surgold or any taxpayer (other than Expatriate Employees) referred to in this Chapter 11, the Republic of Suriname shall ensure that no compulsory or executory measures are taken against such taxpayer.

The tax authorities in Suriname normally having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the dispute shall issue a written ruling setting forth detailed reasons in support thereof, and the taxpayer or taxpayers affected thereby, other than Expatriate Employees, shall be entitled to appeal such ruling in the manner provided in Section 17.3 hereof, which appeal shall suspend execution of such ruling for all purposes until a final determination of the matter has been made in accordance with Section 17.3 hereof.

Such taxpayer shall be entitled, but not required, to exhaust any statutory or administrative rights of appeal from such ruling under the Laws.

Disputes involving Expatriate Employees shall be prosecuted pursuant to applicable law.

Chapter 12 EXPORTING GOLD AND OTHER MINERALS

12.1 Export of Gold and Other Minerals

Subject to Sections 7.5 and 12.3, Surgold shall be entitled to export from Suriname and deposit, lease, sell, assign or otherwise transfer outside Suriname, any gold and other Minerals produced from any Right of Exploitation, without restriction of any kind and, other than as set out in this Agreement, shall be exempted from the obligation to pay any fees, imposts, duties, taxes, administrative and other charges and any other like assessments of any nature whatsoever in connection therewith.

12.2 Inspection

Surgold shall be entitled to export gold and other Minerals as follows:

(a)

Doré will be poured at appropriate intervals as determined by management of Surgold using customary security practices;

(b)

For reasons of security Surgold shall be allowed to use an airport located on or outside the Project lands, as intended in Section 6.4 of this Agreement.

The Republic of Suriname shall cause the authorized government institutions or agencies to declare the airport involved at the request of Surgold to be a port of disembarkation or embarkation for the purpose of carrying doré directly from the Project lands to secure warehouses at locations outside of Suriname for further secure shipment to a refinery designated by Surgold.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

All reasonable costs incurred by the Republic of Suriname in respect of the presence of officials designated for that purpose of the Department of Import Duties and Excises on the Project lands shall be charged to Surgold.

(c)

Surgold will instruct the Payor (as defined in Attachment IV) to issue, in relation to each shipment, an acknowledgement of receipt of doré to Surgold, and a copy thereof to the Republic of Suriname, in such form and substance as will permit the recipients to confirm the arrival at Payor of each shipment of doré exported from the Project.

12.3 Export Authorizations

The Republic of Suriname hereby undertakes to cause Surgold to receive all such specific authorizations and exemptions from authorities having jurisdiction over the matters described in this Chapter 12 as are necessary to give effect to the matters described in this chapter, subject to the obligation of Surgold to observe the administrative procedures in respect thereof.

Chapter 13 REPATRIATION OF CAPITAL AND OTHER PROPERTY FROM SURINAME

13.1 No withholding on repatriations

Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 8.5 and 18.4, Surgold is hereby granted the right to repatriate all of its investment in the Project without the imposition of any withholding tax, charges or impositions.

In the event that Surgold encumbers any or all of its Assets in order to finance the development of the Project, the Republic of Suriname agrees that it shall not impose any withholding taxes on the interest charged by the financiers of the Project.

13.2 Remittances

Surgold shall be entitled to remit all capital invested and profits earned in Suriname to persons outside Suriname without restriction of any kind.

And shall be exempted from the effects of any such restriction, as may be in effect from time to time, under the Laws and (save as expressly provided in Chapter Article 11 hereof) from the obligation to pay any fees, imposts, charges, taxes, administrative and other costs and any other like assessments of any nature whatsoever in connection therewith.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

For greater certainty, Surgold shall be entitled to remit such capital and profits from foreign currency accounts in the manner provided in Section 7.3 hereof.

13.3 Authorizations for repatriations

The Republic of Suriname hereby represents and warrants that Surgold will receive all such specific permits from the competent governmental officials, or agencies having jurisdiction over the subject matter described in Chapter 13 hereof, as are necessary to give effect to these matters, without prejudice to the obligation of Surgold to follow the administrative procedures in respect thereof.

Chapter 14 INSURANCE MATTERS

14.3 Employee Insurance

Surgold shall obtain personal accident insurance in amounts as is customary in the Republic of Suriname and in accordance with the Law for its employees for the duration of Operations.

14.2 General Liability Insurance

Upon granting of the Merian Right of Exploitation, Surgold shall obtain general liability insurance satisfactory to the financial institutions providing financing for the Project.

In the event that such insurance coverages are not available or are available only at prohibitive cost in Suriname, the Republic of Suriname will cooperate with Surgold to enable Surgold to provide, at such company’s own expense, adequate insurance coverage outside Suriname, provided such coverage is not under management of Surgold or an affiliated company.

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Surgold may self-insure as it deems appropriate.

Chapter 15 REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES, COVENANTS AND UNDERTAKINGS

15.1 Representation and Warranties of Surgold

Surgold represents and warrants to the Republic of Suriname as follows:

(a)

that it is a body corporate duly organized and validly in existence and has the corporate power and authority to own its property and conduct its business;

(b)

that it has the capacity to enter into and perform this Agreement and all transactions contemplated herein, that all corporate and other action required to be taken in order to permit it to enter into and perform this Agreement has been properly and validly taken, and all federal and state government approvals in the United States of America required to be obtained for such purposes have been obtained and remain in effect;

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

(c)

that it shall not breach any other agreement or arrangement by entering into or performing its obligations under this Agreement; nor, in so doing, shall it breach any provisions of its constituting documents, by-laws or administrative resolutions;

(d)

that this Agreement has been duly executed by it and is valid, binding and enforceable against it in accordance with its terms;

(e)

that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, and that, after due inquiry of its directors and officers, there exists no material fact or circumstance applicable to this Agreement or the Project which has not been previously disclosed to the Republic of Suriname or GMD, as applicable, and which should be disclosed to prevent the representations made in this Agreement from being materially misleading.

15.2 Covenants of Surgold

Surgold hereby covenants and undertakes as follows:

(a)

that it shall, subject to Chapter 17 hereof, assume liability for any damages caused by the acts and omissions of all its persons contracted and employed by it, provided such acts or omissions occurs within the framework of the legal relationship of these persons with Surgold.

Surgold will also assume liability for any damages caused by its contractors, subcontractors and agents in violation of its obligations under this Agreement provided such violation occurs under express instructions of Surgold;

(b)

that it shall, subject to Chapter 17 hereof, indemnify and hold harmless the Republic of Suriname and/or GMD, their respective employees, agents, and representatives from and against all suits for injury or claims for damages to persons or property resulting from or arising out of illegal or unlawful conduct in the performance of its Operations hereunder.

Surgold shall assume, the defense of any lawsuit that may be brought against the Republic of Suriname by reason of Surgold’s conduct of Operations under this Agreement, and pay upon demand, on behalf of the Republic of Suriname, the amount of any final judgment that may be entered against the Republic of Suriname in any such lawsuit.

The Republic of Suriname shall be held to use all possible legal remedies against such judgment, while payment by Surgold on behalf of the Republic of Suriname will only follow in case the Republic of Suriname through the execution of the judgment is forced to pay.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

Provided, however, that the obligations of Surgold under this Section shall not apply to any suit for injury or claim for damages, or other relief against the Republic of Suriname based on its own actions, policies or conduct and/or:

(i)

based upon any challenge by a third party to the Republic of Suriname’s, or GMD’s, or Surgold’s right or title to, or claim based on the occupation, alteration or use of, or damage to all or any part of the Project; and

(ii)

resulting from or arising out of any action or inaction of the Republic of Suriname or the GMD not expressly required under this Agreement.

Any dispute between Surgold, on the one hand, and the Republic of Suriname on the other, with respect to the obligations of Surgold under this Section 15.2 shall be resolved pursuant to Chapter 17 of this Agreement.

15.3 Representation and Warranties of the Republic of Suriname

The Republic of Suriname hereby represents and warrants to Surgold as follows:

(a)

that the Republic of Suriname, in its capacity as a sovereign state has the right, power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement;

(b)

that this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Republic of Suriname, and that this Agreement is valid, binding and enforceable against it in accordance with its terms;

(c)

that they shall not breach any other agreement or arrangement by entering into or performing this Agreement;

(d)

that the plot of land where the Project is located is free State-Owned Land and third parties do not have any rights with respect to the property (excluding mineral rights), including, without limitation, rights of enjoyment, occupation or usufruct thereon; and

(e)

that there are no asserted claims, rights or encumbrances of any nature which may affect in any material way any Right of Exploration or any Right of Exploitation, or the Development; and that, to the best of their knowledge, there are no valid unasserted or potential claims, rights or encumbrances of any nature which may affect in any material way any Right of Exploration or any Right of Exploitation or Development.

For the purposes of this paragraph, “asserted claim” means a claim contained in a written notice or filed by appropriate proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

15.4 Undertakings by the Republic of Suriname

Subject to Chapter 2 of this Agreement, the Republic of Suriname hereby undertakes that it shall take all such steps which are necessary for the implementation of this Agreement, including passing all the necessary acts and issuing the necessary authorizations to provide for the adaptation and modification of Laws which may affect the implementation of’ this Agreement, and to allow Surgold to continue to carry out their obligations and to receive the benefits accorded to them under this Agreement.

15.5 Unilateral action taken by the Republic of Suriname

15.5.1 Without limiting the application of Sections 15.6 and 15.7 hereof and without prejudice to any other undertaking of the Republic of Suriname set forth in this Agreement, if, at any time during the term of this Agreement, the Republic of Suriname enacts or adopts any new Law or repeals any existing Law (collectively,

“Unilateral Action”), and if such Unilateral Action (by itself or in conjunction with any other Law or Laws) has the effect of preventing or constraining the exercise of any material right or of materially increasing the burden of performance of any obligation (including any increase in an obligation to pay a sum of money) of Surgold hereunder (a “Negative Effect”), the Republic of Suriname agrees to take such measures as may be required to restore Surgold to the position they would have retained had such Unilateral Action not been taken (“Corrective Action”).

Such Corrective Action may take any or all of the following forms, at the election of the Republic of Suriname:

(a)

an exemption from the application of the Law that is the direct or indirect subject of the Unilateral Action or the direct or indirect cause of the Negative Effect;

(b)

an undertaking to remit additional amounts that would otherwise be payable as a result of such Unilateral Action;

(c)

the enactment of specific legislation (including subsidiary legislation) eliminating the Negative Effect, or;

(d)

any other form acceptable to Surgold and the Republic of Suriname.

15.5.2 For greater certainty the Republic of Suriname agrees to take Corrective Action to eliminate the Negative Effects of any Unilateral Action on Surgold or any Right of Exploration or any Right of Exploitation, or taken on or in respect of any of the matters described in this Agreement.

15.5.3 Insofar as any Law which is enacted after the Date of Commencement and which is in violation of the express conditions and terms of this Agreement, and thus significantly and negatively influencing the activities or business operations, the Republic of Suriname must take action to take away the Negative Effect for Surgold.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

15.5.4 Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing set forth in this Agreement shall be interpreted as preventing the Republic of Suriname from taking Unilateral Action, but without any obligation to take Corrective Action, if the Unilateral Action is necessary for:

(a)

the protection of the health and safety of the population of the Republic of Suriname or parts thereof; or

(b)

the protection of the human and natural environment of the Republic of Suriname; or

(c)

complying with international obligations arising out of treaties ratified by the Republic of Suriname.

In respect of the application of such Unilateral Action to Surgold it should be offered sufficient room to ensure the observance thereof.

The Unilateral Action should relate to the prevention of damage to the general health and safety of the population and the human and natural environment, and should meet standards of reasonableness, designated as ‘good government practice’ and in accordance with international standards.

15.5.5 Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 15.5 hereof, the Republic of Suriname shall not, whether by Unilateral Action or otherwise, unilaterally amend or terminate this Agreement other than in accordance with the express terms hereof.

15.6 Preservation of Surgold’s Property Rights

With respect to the property, rights and interests of Surgold arising out of this Agreement or in any way connected with the Project, and subject to Chapter 2 of this Agreement, the Republic of Suriname agrees to: (i) ensure the fair and equitable treatment of such property rights and interests, (ii) in no way to impair or interfere with the management, maintenance, use, enjoyment or disposal (except as expressly provided herein) of such property, rights and interests, and (iii) to take no action to expropriate any property, rights or interests, whether characterized as expropriation or otherwise, or to directly or indirectly deprive Surgold of such property, rights or interests.

15.7 Partnering against Corruption

15.7.1 Each Party acknowledges its intention and undertaking to abide by all applicable Anti-Corruption Laws.

15.7.2 Upon receipt by a Party of information that, on its sole discretion, such Party determines to be evidence of a breach of the provisions of Section 15.7.1, such Party shall immediately notify the other Party thereof in writing.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

The Partners promptly shall meet to discuss the information obtained and attempt to resolve any concerns raised by such Party.

15.8 Survival

The representations, warranties, covenants and undertakings set forth in this Chapter 15 shall remain in effect throughout the term of this Agreement and shall be in addition to, and not in substitution for, any other representations, warranties, covenants and undertakings set forth in this Agreement.

Subject to Chapter 17, each Party to this Agreement shall immediately upon receipt of written notice from the other Party undertake to cure a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or undertaking of that Party, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the other Party to this Agreement, and their respective employees, agents, and representatives, from and against all suits for injury or claims for damages to persons or property resulting from or arising out of such breach.

Chapter 16 DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES

16.1 Default of the Republic of Suriname

Should the Republic of Suriname fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, Surgold shall give reasonable notice to the Republic of Suriname specifying the nature of the default and indicating that action must be taken to cure such default.

If corrective action is not completed within the cure period (which, unless a longer period is otherwise specified in the notice, shall be a period of sixty (60) days after notice), Surgold shall be entitled to institute proceedings in accordance with Chapter 17 of this Agreement.

16.2 Default of Surgold

Surgold shall be deemed to be in default hereunder if:

(a)

it fails to perform any obligation assumed by it hereunder and fails to completely remedy such failure of performance within sixty (60) days of the date of receipt by Surgold of a written notice of such failure to perform from or on behalf of the Republic of Suriname; provided, however, that Surgold may contest such notice of default provided it does so within sixty (60) days of the date of receipt of notice from the Republic of Suriname and pursuant to Chapter 17;

(b)

Surgold has not commenced Development as mentioned in Section 4.3 and fails to completely remedy such failure of performance within sixty (60) days of the date of receipt by Surgold of a written notice of such failure to perform from or on behalf of the Republic of Suriname; provided, however, that Surgold may contest such notice of default provided it does so within sixty (60) days of the date of receipt of notice from the Republic of Suriname and pursuant to Chapter 17.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

16.3 Termination

The Republic of Suriname may, subject to Section 16.4 hereof, terminate this Agreement and any Right of Exploitation in the event of a default under Section 16.2 (which is not cured or contested by Surgold within the applicable notice period) by written notice to Surgold, provided such default constitutes a material breach of this Agreement.

In determining whether a “material breach” of this Agreement has occurred, the following shall specifically be considered:

(a)

the good faith or lack thereof on the part of Surgold;

(b)

external factors, if any, which contributed to the breach;

(c)

the relative harm inflicted upon the Republic of Suriname and its People; and

(d)

whether the breach can be cured by the payment of money and any interest owed thereon, in which case, provided that Surgold demonstrates that it is capable and prepared to make payment of such damages, and does so within a reasonable period of time, the breach shall not be deemed a material breach.

16.4 No Termination during Proceedings

If Surgold has instituted proceedings in accordance with Chapter 17 hereof, the Republic of Suriname shall not terminate or purport to terminate this Agreement or any Right of Exploitation, and Surgold shall be entitled to continue Operations hereunder until the proceedings described in Chapter 17 shall have been completed.

An exception shall apply to the foregoing in case of continuing breaches of a very serious nature on public health, the human and natural environment of the Republic of Suriname or the risk of such breaches.

16.5 Institute Proceedings

Within the context of this Agreement, a Party shall be deemed to have “instituted proceedings” or “contested” hereunder if it serves written notice to the other Party to the dispute as referred to in Section 17.2 hereof and continues to avail itself of the dispute resolution mechanisms set forth in Chapter 17 hereof with diligence thereafter.

If Surgold has instituted proceedings under Section 17.2 hereof in connection with an allegation by the Republic of Suriname of a default by Surgold hereunder and Surgold continues to deny such alleged default after such proceedings have been completed, then the Republic of Suriname may, if it wishes to sustain its allegations, institute arbitration proceedings under Section 17.3 hereof.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

If the Republic of Suriname succeeds in proving a default by Surgold hereunder to the satisfaction of an arbitral tribunal constituted under Section 17.3 hereof, it shall be entitled to such compensation in the form of damages as the tribunal shall award in accordance with the evidence presented and the provisions of applicable Law.

However, the Republic of Suriname shall not be entitled to seek a termination of any Right of Exploitation or this Agreement unless Surgold expressly consents to such termination or is adjudged by the tribunal to have committed a material breach of this Agreement or the Right of Exploitation.

In the event the Republic of Suriname shall be entitled to seek a termination of the Right of Exploitation or this Agreement, nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to prevent the Republic of Suriname from recovering any damages caused by any breach of this Agreement by Surgold.

16.6 Position of Lenders

Should the Republic of Suriname give a notice to Surgold pursuant to Section 16.3, the Republic of Suriname shall give reasonable consideration to any proposal that any Lender of Surgold may subsequently make to the Republic of Suriname taking into consideration the positions of such Lender in regard to any outstanding obligations that Surgold may have to it at that time.

Chapter 17 DISPUTE RESOLUTION

17.1 Dispute Resolution

If any dispute or conflict arises under this Agreement the Parties shall resolve such dispute in the manner hereinafter set forth.

17.2 Commencement of Proceedings

Any Party to the dispute may commence proceedings under this Chapter 17, with a notification to the other Party after he has convened a meeting between or among the chief executive (or their highest-ranking representatives) of Surgold’s Parent Company or any successor and the Minister of Natural Resources.

Such group shall meet on a mutually agreed upon date within thirty (30) days from the date of the notice convening the meeting and shall use according to the requirements of good faith their best efforts to achieve a settlement to solve the dispute.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

17.3 Arbitration

17.3.1 Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Agreement or the breach, termination, validity, performance or interpretation thereof which is not resolved pursuant to Section 17.2 hereof or otherwise shall be referred for determination to final, and binding arbitration before the London Court of Arbitration (the “Court”), to the exclusion of all courts of any State and other like forums, under the Rules of the London Court of Arbitration applicable to International Arbitrations (the London Rules) valid on the date of the dispute.

17.3.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the following provisions:

(a)

The Republic of Suriname and Surgold shall each be entitled to appoint a qualified person to act as arbitrator and the Court shall appoint a third arbitrator to complete the tribunal who shall not be a citizen or resident of either Suriname or the United States of America, and the person so appointed by the Court shall act as chairman of the tribunal.

(b)

The arbitration hearings shall be held in London, England.

(c)

Each Party shall participate in any arbitration proceedings at its own expense, while expenses of arbitration shall be borne equally by the opposing Parties.

17.4 Conciliation or Mediation

The Parties to a dispute may, but need not, refer a dispute to the Court for purposes of attempting a conciliation or mediation thereof, in which event the rules and practices of the Court relating to conciliation or mediation shall apply.

The failure to attempt or complete conciliation or mediation proceedings shall in no event prevent a Party from instituting arbitration proceedings in accordance with Section 17.3 of this Agreement.

17.5 Failure to Participate

The failure by a Party to participate in arbitral proceedings shall not constitute valid grounds for rejecting the jurisdiction of the tribunal or the validity and enforceability of any of its awards.

Each Party hereby undertakes to execute any arbitral award rendered against it in accordance with the applicable provisions, in full, voluntarily and without delay and hereby waives any entitlement to invoke any ground of immunity in respect of jurisdiction or the execution or enforcement of such award, including, without limitation, principles of sovereign immunity.

17.6 General Principles of International Law

Notwithstanding Section 21.12, to the extent that any arbitration involves a dispute between (a) Surgold and (b) the Republic of Suriname, the Parties agree that the arbitrators shall be entitled, at their discretion, to apply such general principles of International Law, as may be necessary to give full effect to the true intentions of the Parties as set forth in this Agreement, subject, however, that in no event may either party assert grounds of privilege or immunity in respect of jurisdiction of the Arbitral Court, or execution or enforcement of any award.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

Chapter 18 TERM AND TERMINATION

18.1 Term

This Agreement shall be deemed to have come into force as of the Effective Date, provided that all acts performed and all expenses incurred by Surgold in anticipation of the Effective Date and on the assumption that this Agreement would be executed shall be deemed for all purposes to have been validly performed and incurred pursuant to this Agreement.

This Agreement shall remain in effect until the twenty fifth (25th) anniversary of the date of registration of the Merian Right of Exploitation in the Registers of the Mortgage Office, unless earlier terminated pursuant to this Chapter 18 or extended upon request of Surgold and approval of the Republic of Suriname.

The foregoing shall not apply in case any Right of Exploitation is granted subsequent to the Merian Right of Exploitation, in which event, upon the granting of such new Right of Exploitation, this Agreement shall automatically extend for an additional ten (10) year period calculated from the next day after the twenty fifth (25th) anniversary of the date of registration of the Merian Right of Exploitation.

18.2 Termination by the Republic of Suriname

The Republic of Suriname shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement only under the circumstances described and in the manner set forth in Sections 16.2 and 16.3 of this Agreement.

18.3 Steps upon Termination

In the case of a termination of this Agreement pursuant to Sections 18.1 or 18.2 hereof, Surgold shall, insofar as applicable:

(a)

be required subject to Sections 8.5 and 18.4 (unless such requirement is waived by the Republic of Suriname) to remove, sell, salvage, or otherwise deal with its Assets in Suriname within thirty six (36) months following the termination of this Agreement;

(b)

arrange and pay for the rehabilitation of the Project Lands used and damaged as provided in Section 19.4 and the EISA;

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

(c)

pay any fees due hereunder up to the time termination becomes effective;

(d)

submit a termination report in relation to the matters described in Section 8.5 hereof; and

(e)

submit complete reports and evaluations, maps, assays, samples, drilling tests, files and related information to the GMD.

18.4 Certificate of Compliance

Before Surgold shall be granted the right to remove its Assets from Suriname, Surgold shall obtain from the GMD a certificate of compliance with its obligations under Section 18.3. under (b) of this Agreement.

This certificate shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed by GMD, and shall in no event be issued later than thirty (30) days after Surgold or the Venture complies with its obligations in Section 18.3 under (b) through (e).

18.5 Transfer of Infrastructure

Upon the termination of this Agreement and the final termination of the Project by Surgold and the removal of Surgold’s Assets from Project Lands, in accordance with Section 18.3, title to all roads and ports (including marine or river ports and airports), all water distribution systems, and all regional diesel electric installations owned by Surgold shall pass to the Republic of Suriname for the amount of one (1) Suriname Dollar, such title to be free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, claims or charges created by, through or under Surgold.

Chapter 19 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

19.1 Standards

Surgold will adhere to applicable Laws and operate consistent with practices specified in the IFC’s General Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines and the IFC’s Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Mining.

19.2 Operations

Surgold shall use reasonable efforts to minimize the negative impact of Operations on human settlements, forest, land, water quality and local flora and fauna.

Without limiting the foregoing, Surgold shall (i) implement the ESIA, (ii) take care to avoid fires and control soil erosion on the land and (iii) take all practicable actions to minimize the area of disturbance required for Operations.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

19.3 Protection of the Environment

Surgold shall implement the ESIA, including the plans for environmental management, mine closure, and accident prevention and emergency response in order to preserve and protect the natural environmental conditions of Project Lands.

The ESIA will also specify mitigation requirements to reduce stream and air pollution, and to protect the local communities.

Without limiting the foregoing, Surgold shall in accordance with the IFC’s General Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines and the IFC’s Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Mining, conduct Operations so as not to pollute any surface or subsurface fresh water supply, to limit air pollution, minimize erosion and control sediment to maintain waste disposal areas in a reasonable manner and revegetate them in accordance with the closure plan specified in the ESIA and, in a more general sense, to take the necessary measures to minimize the adverse effects of the Project on the environment and the population.

19.4 Rehabilitation

Surgold is required to rehabilitate mining disturbances in accordance with the ESIA.

Rehabilitation of Project Lands shall be done by Surgold at its sole cost and expense.

Concurrent rehabilitation should be followed as possible for surface and/or subsurface areas, improvements thereon, related facilities, roads, and waste disposal sites that are of no further use for Operations.

Mine pits will not be re-claimed, unless the reclamation takes place as an integrated part of excavating subsequent mine pits.

Following termination of this Agreement, Surgold shall have full access to the Project Lands to complete any required rehabilitation.

19.4.1 Disturbances created by Porknocking

The Republic of Suriname acknowledges that Porknocking activities conducted within Project Lands by third parties has and will create significant disturbances and environmental degradation and therefore not subject to any liability against Surgold.

The Republic of Suriname acknowledges further that, provided that Surgold has not actively promoted the Porknocking, neither Surgold shall be liable for any existing or future liabilities derived from such activities and is not responsible for reclamation of such disturbances.

Existing Porknocking disturbances will be documented by Surgold prior to the start of a Development and detailed in the applicable ESIA as part of the existing environment prior to the start of commercial production.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

Surgold will also monitor on an annual basis changes in Porknocking activities and detail these changes in a report to the Republic of Suriname.

19.4.2 Reclamation Assurance Coverage

To assure financial coverage of reclamation liability Surgold will provide the Republic of Suriname, upon the granting of any Right of Exploitation, and on an annual basis thereafter with: (a) a corporate guarantee of the Parent Company equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Calculated Reclamation Cost (as defined below); and (b) the remaining twenty (20%) covered by a letter of credit, insurance policy, or surety bond issued by an A-rated or better financial institution, with the Republic of Suriname as the beneficiary.

In the event of change-of-control of Surgold, the Republic of Suriname shall have the right to modify these assurance coverage requirements.

The fees associated with obtaining the coverage required for (b) above, shall be deducted by Surgold in the period for which the coverage was issued.

The Calculated Reclamation Cost shall mean: the cost, calculated on an annual basis, from the date of the granting of the Right of Exploitation, and following GAAP procedures, for reclamation of existing mining disturbances after deduction of reclamation expenditures conducted during a given year, which amount shall be tax deductible.

For the purpose of clarity, a sample calculation is provided in Attachment XII.

The Republic of Suriname has the right to have a third party review the estimated annual liability and request adjustment of the financial assurance coverage if the review indicates an adjustment is necessary.

19.5 Community Fund for Social Development

Surgold hereby declares its intent to create a Community Development Fund (CDF) with the goal of funding projects dedicated to the sustainable development of the local community. The CDF will be established upon the granting of the Merian Right of Exploitation. Funding will be provided by Surgold on an annual basis during Operations.

The CDF will be governed by a board of six directors composed by an equal number of representatives of the Paramaka Community, the Republic of Suriname and Surgold. The directors will jointly appoint the manager of the CDF.

The board of directors will establish rules governing the operation of the CDF and decide on the choice of projects to fund and in identifying these projects, shall consider projects that occur in the districtplan Sipaliwini and also subsequently oversee their execution and implementation.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

The amount of funding as well as projects being funded, their execution and implementation will be made public in the Project website.

Chapter 20 ROYALTY

20.1 Royalty Description

Surgold shall pay to the Republic of Suriname a Royalty in the amount of six percent (6%) over the Net Smelter Returns, as referred to the Attachment IV.

20.2 Records and Audits

The Republic of Suriname shall have the right, upon reasonable notice to Surgold, to inspect and copy all books, records, technical data, information and materials, hereinafter, the Data, pertaining to the calculation of the Royalty; provided that such inspections shall not unreasonably interfere with Operations.

Surgold makes no representations or warranties to Republic of Suriname concerning any of the quarterly Data or any quarterly information contained in any quarterly reports, and Republic of Suriname agrees that if it elects to rely on any such quarterly Data or quarterly information, it does so at its sole risk.

If any such audit or inspection reveals that Royalty payments for any calendar year are underpaid or overpaid, then Surgold shall pay in the case of an underpayment of Royalty such difference yet to the Republic of Suriname, like the Republic of Suriname in the case of an overpayment of Royalty will reimburse Surgold the difference.

If the audit or inspection reveals, however, that Royalty payments for any calendar year are underpaid by more than three percent (3%), Surgold shall fully pay the Republic of Suriname for its reasonable costs incurred in such audit or inspection.

Chapter 21 MISCELLANEOUS AND FINAL PROVISIONS

21.1 Force Majeure

For the purpose of this Agreement, “Force Majeure” means an extraordinary event, which, during any period while this Agreement is in effect, prevents the Operations or the material performance of the obligations required by a Party, where the cause of such event is reasonably beyond the control of such Party, and shall include, without limitation, war, declared or undeclared; riot; civil insurrection; acts of sabotage; terrorism; fire; floods; wind; other damage from the elements; shortage or interruption of essential goods or equipment; strikes; lockouts and labor disputes; interruption or unavailability of transportation; action of government authority; acts of God; acts of the public enemy; and, after the Commencement of Commercial Production, a commodity price for Minerals produced and sold from Project Lands which is not sufficient for a period of nine (9) consecutive months to cover the costs of Operations for that time period, hereinafter, Commodity Price Force Majeure.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

21.2 Suspension of Obligations

If an event of Force Majeure prevents the material performance of any obligation under this Agreement, such obligation shall be suspended until the event which gave rise to the force majeure is eliminated or until the material performance of such obligation becomes possible despite the existence of the event of force majeure.

During an event of force majeure, Surgold shall put forth reasonable commercial efforts to maintain all Assets, which are not otherwise damaged or made inaccessible by the event of force majeure, in good condition.

In the event that Surgold has claimed Force Majeure it shall take reasonable steps to minimize the impact of such force majeure.

In the event of a Commodity Price Force Majeure, Surgold shall maintain all its Assets in good conditions, meet the environmental health and safety requirements set forth herein and shall pay the Republic of Suriname the sum of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars (US$500,000) at the end of-the first year after commencement of such Commodity Price Force Majeure and the sum of One Million United States Dollars (US$1,000,000) at the end of every year thereafter, provided, however, that no such payment shall be due following the recommencement of Operations until the occurrence of another Commodity Price Force Majeure.

The Republic of Suriname shall have the right to terminate this Agreement in the event a Commodity Price Force Majeure is in place for more than five (5) consecutive years without recommencement of Operations (as defined below). As used herein, Recommencement of Operations means commencement of Operations after a Commodity Price Force Majeure and continuation thereof for at least six (6) months in a twelve (12) month period.

21.3 Confidentiality

All information obtained by the designated agents of the Republic of Suriname regarding the books and records of Surgold, as contemplated in Section 6.6 of this Agreement and/or during inspections of Operations, as contemplated in Section 6.7 of this Agreement, shall be deemed confidential pursuant to chapter XI of the Mining Act.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

21.4

No Waiver

The failure of a Party to insist on the strict performance of any provision of this Agreement or to exercise any right, power or remedy upon a breach hereof shall not constitute a waiver of any provision of this Agreement or limit the Parties’ right thereafter to enforce any provision or exercise any right unless such waiver is unambiguous, in writing and signed by the person waiving such right, power or remedy.

Any waiver of such right, power or remedy shall not be construed as a waiver of any succeeding or other right, power or remedy unless the contrary is expressly stated in writing and signed by the Party making such waiver.

The failure by a Party to perform an obligation hereunder shall not excuse the performance by any other Party of its obligations hereunder unless the first mentioned obligation is a material obligation,

But in no event shall a Party be relieved of the obligation to provide notice to the other Party pursuant to this Agreement.

21.5 Amendments

No amendment to this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and duly executed by each of the Parties.

21.6 Entire Agreement

This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the Parties and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof.

There are no implied covenants in this Agreement other than those of good faith and fair dealing.

This Agreement shall be binding upon and ensure to the benefit of the respective permitted successors and assigns of each of the Parties.

21.7 Arm’s-Length Transactions

Surgold shall be allowed to transact with Affiliates including but not limited to the supply of goods or services provided that such transactions are done on the terms of Arm’s-Length Transactions.

21.8 Assignments

During the term of this Agreement Surgold will be permitted to assign all or any portion of its rights and obligations under this Agreement to any technically and financially competent third party, which shall be a bona fide company or party and shall be acceptable to the Republic of Suriname (such acceptance not to be unreasonably withheld or conditioned).

In the event of such assignment, such third party shall have all obligations of Surgold under this Agreement.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

21.9 Regular Communication

The Parties hereby agree to cooperate at all times and to contribute to the extent of their respective capacities in order to ensure efficiency in the performance of Operations hereunder and to ensure the success of the Project for the economic development of Suriname.

To this end, the Parties agree to meet on a regular basis to discuss matters of mutual concern.

Among one of these will be an evaluation of the performance of the Parties pursuant to this Agreement by the Parties, and more in particular five (5) years after Commencement of Commercial Production and subsequently every fifth (5 ^th ) anniversary thereafter, to determine if the Agreement has complied with the mutual interests.

Proposals for changes of clauses of this Agreement will be discussed in good faith and take place with consent of both Parties.

21.10 Notices

All notices and other required communications made pursuant to this Agreement to any Party shall be in writing and shall be addressed as follows:

TO: THE REPUBLIC OF SURINAME:

Attn: Minister of Natural Resources

Mr. Dr. J.C. de Mirandastraat 11-15

Paramaribo, Suriname, South America

Telephone: 597-473428

Fax: 597-472911

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC


TO: SURGOLD:		Attn: Branch Manager Suriname Gold Company LLC Surinamestraat 54 Paramaribo, Suriname Telephone: 597-402892 Fax: 597-402893

		Copy to: Newmont Mining Corp. attn: Land Department 6363 South Fiddler’s Green Circle Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 U.S.A. Telephone: 1 303-837-5775 Fax: 1 303-837-5851

All notices shall be given (a) by personal delivery to a Party; (b) by electronic communication (including telexes, telecopies or telefaxes), or (c) by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested.

All notices shall be effective and shall be deemed to have been delivered (i) if by personal delivery, on the date of delivery if delivered during normal business hours and, if not, then on the next Business Day following delivery; (ii) if by electronic communication, on the next Business Day following receipt of the electronic communication; and (iii) if solely by mail, on the next Business Day after actual receipt.

A Party may change its address for notice by providing notice of such new address to the other Parties.

21.11 Language

This Agreement has been executed in triplicate, both in the Dutch and English languages, both texts being equally authentic.

In the event of a conflict between the English and Dutch version, the Dutch version shall prevail.

21.12 Governing Law

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Republic of Suriname without prejudice to Section 17.6.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

The courts of the Republic of Suriname shall have jurisdiction to the enforcing of any arbitral award.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the Parties have hereunto caused their authorized representatives to set their respective hands hereto in Paramaribo, Suriname, in the presence of one another the day and year first above written.


THE REPUBLIC OF SURINAME,				SURINAME GOLD COMPANY LLC,

/s/ J.K. Hok				/s/ Adriaan Van Kersen
The Minister of Natural Resources

/s/ S. Relyveld
The Minister of Finance

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

Attachment I Venture Agreement

Table of contents


1.	INTERPRETATION	1

2.	REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES; RECORD TITLE; INDEMNITIES	8

3.	NAME, PURPOSE AND TERM	11

4	RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTNERS	13

5.	CONTRIBUTIONS BY THE PARTNERS	14

6.	PARTICIPATING INTERESTS	15

7.	MANAGEMENT AND REPRESENTATION	19

8.	STRATEGY COMMITTEE	23

9.	PARTNERS’ MEETINGS	24

10.	PROGRAMS AND BUDGETS	26

11.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND CASH DISTRIBUTIONS	28

12.	WITHDRAWAL AND TERMINATION	30

13.	TAXES	31

14.	TRANSFER OF INTEREST	31

15.	ACQUISITIONS WITHIN AREA OF INTEREST	35

16.	GENERAL PROVISIONS	36


EXHIBIT A		ACCOUNTING PROCEDURE

EXHIBIT B		MAP OF AREA OF INTEREST

EXHIBIT C		ASSETS CONTRIBUTED BY SURGOLD

EXHIBIT D		PARTICIPATING INTEREST

EXHIBIT E		EXISTING ROYALTIES

COMMANDITAIRE VENNOOTSCHAP AGREEMENT

THIS COMMANDITAIRE VENNOOTSCHAP AGREEMENT (this “Partnership Agreement”) is entered into as of 22 November 2013, by and between NV 2, a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Suriname (the “ NV 2 ”), and SURINAME GOLD COMPANY LLC , a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, United States of America (“ Surgold ”).

RECITALS

A. Surgold and the Republic of Suriname have entered into a Mineral Agreement (the “Mineral Agreement”) dated as of , 2013 , which established the conditions for the granting to Surgold of one or more Rights of Exploration and one or more Rights of Exploitation within the Area of Interest described in the Mineral Agreement, and in which the right to participate in the Merian Gold Project, and the transfer of this right to NV 2, is provided for.

B. The NV 2 is a legal person under the laws of the Republic of Suriname, formed for the purpose of participating in such projects.

C. Surgold and the NV 2 desire to provide for the formation of a commanditaire vennootschap (the “Partnership”), effective and conditional upon the Republic of Suriname’s exercise of the Option and thus the successive transfer of its right to participate in the Merian Gold Project to NV 2 has taken place, as provided in Section 3 of the Mineral Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE , in consideration of the covenants and terms contained herein, Surgold and the NV 2 agree as follows:

1. INTERPRETATION

1.1. Definitions

With the exception of those mentioned herein below, all capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this agreement shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Mineral Agreement.

“Assets ” means all Partnership Rights, all Products, and any other real and personal property, tangible and intangible, held for the benefit of the Partners hereunder.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		1

“Additional Rights” means any Rights of Exploration or Rights of Exploitation, other than the Merian Right of Exploitation, contributed by Surgold for use by the Partnership as part of its initial contribution pursuant to Section 5.1.

“Arm’s-Length Transaction” means a transaction between Affiliates which shall be consistent with the result that would have been realized, if the parties to the transaction had not been related to each other.

“Operations ” means all or any of Exploration, Development and Mining, (mine)closure, reclamation and any other acts, including acts of administration and management, performed by or on behalf of Surgold pursuant to the Project or this agreement.

“Commencement of Joint Funding” shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 5.3.

“Managing Partner ” shall mean Surgold, in its capacity as managing partner of the Partnership.

“Existing Data” means maps, drill logs and other drilling data, core tests, pulps, reports, surveys, assays, analyses, production reports, Operations, technical, accounting and financial records, and any other material or information relating to the Project, which is owned by Surgold or any Affiliate of Surgold.

“Existing Royalties” means the obligation to pay royalties to third parties as indicated in Exhibit E.

“Accounting Procedure” means the accounting practice set forth in Exhibit A.

“Budget” means the total of all program costs including capital expenditures, operating costs and working capital in the form of an estimate that provides reasonable detail, including costs to be incurred by each Partner.

“Limited Partner” shall mean the NV 2.

“Confidential Information” shall have the meaning given in Section 16.6.

“Contribution Effective Date” shall have the meaning given thereto in Section 5.1.

“Effective Date” means the date upon which the Option is exercised.

“Participating Interest ” means, for each Partner, the percentage representing its partnership interest, as such percentage may from time to time be adjusted hereunder.

Participating Interests shall be calculated to three decimal places and rounded to two (e.g., 1.519% rounded to 1.52%).

Decimals of .005 or more shall be rounded up to .01; decimals of less than .005 shall be rounded down.

The Participating Interests of the Partners are as calculated in accordance with Section 6.1 and reflected on Exhibit D to this Agreement.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		2

Immediately after payment by Surgold of its initial contribution pursuant to Section 5.1, the Partnership Rights will consist of the Merian Right of Exploitation and any Additional Rights.

Partnership Rights will also be deemed to include any Rights of Exploration, Rights of Exploitation or Third Party Rights, granted by the Republic of Suriname to Surgold or otherwise acquired by NV 2 and contributed by Surgold for use by the Partnership pursuant to Section 15.2.

“Minerals ” means (gold and) all metals that commonly occur with gold in nature, such as copper, silver, platinum-group metals and tellurium produced from any Right of Exploitation pursuant to the Mineral Agreement.

“Mineral Agreement ” has the meaning given in the Recitals to this agreement.

“Third Party Rights ” means any right of exploration, any right of exploitation, asset(s) or interest in such acquired from a third party within the Area of Interest.

“Exploration” means any activity performed with a view to determining the existence, location, quantity and quality of Minerals on any Project Lands.

“GAAP” shall mean the generally accepted accounting principles and practices of the United States of America.

“Area of Interest ” means the area depicted on the map attached as Exhibit B.

“Affiliate ” of a Partner means an entity or person that Controls, is Controlled by, or is under common Control with the Partner.

“Indemnified Partner ” has the meaning described in Subsection 2.4.1

“Historical Cost ” shall mean any costs incurred from 1 April 2004 until the Effective Date by Surgold or Affiliates within the framework of the Merian Right of Exploration, and /or arising from Operations, within any Right of Exploration within the Area of Interest, and furthermore any costs incurred by Surgold or Affiliates within the framework of the Merian Right of Exploitation to be granted.

“IFRS” means the International Financial Reporting Standards published by the International Accounting Standards Board.

“Initial NV 2 Contribution” is the amount, in US Dollars, payable by the NV 2 to the Partnership after the exercise of the Option equals to the Participating Interest of the NV 2 (which shall in no event exceed the Maximum NV 2 Participating Interest), multiplied by the Total Value.

“Encumbrance” or “Encumbrances” means mortgages, deeds of trust, security interests, pledges, liens, net profits interests, royalties or overriding royalty interests, other costs out of production, or other burdens of any nature applicable to any Partnership Rights.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		3

“LIBOR” means the London Interbank Offered Rate and is the annual rate of interest at which banks borrow funds from other banks, in marketable size, in the London interbank market.

“Monthly Production” means the gold that is monthly supplied to a refinery.

“Maximum-” or “Maximal NV 2 Participating Interest ” shall mean twenty five percent (25%).

“Merian Gold Project” means the Operations on account of the Merian Right of Exploration, and after the granting thereof, on account of the Merian Right of Exploitation, in accordance with the Agreement.

“Merian Right of Exploitation” means the Right of Exploitation for gold and other Minerals to be granted to Surgold for the Development of the Merian Gold Project, requested by Surgold on 25 October 2007, as amended on 27 January 2009, as further amended on 24 September 2009, for a surface area of 16,788.35 hectares, which shall have an initial term of twenty-five (25) years.

“Merian Right of Exploration” means the Right of Exploration for gold and other Minerals granted to Surgold on 7 February 2001 by decree of the Minister of Natural Resources (GMD no. 113/00), recorded on 26 April 2001, in register H 4 under no. 461, held by the Recorder of Mortgages, as extended by administrative decision of the Minister of Natural Resources (GMD No. 501/03) and again on 13 February 2006 by administrative decision of the Minister of Natural Resources (GMD No. 501/05), for an area of 25,916.25 hectares.

“Mining” means and includes the extracting, processing, milling, smelting, beneficiation, storing, handling, delivering and or the storage and containment of mill tailings and disposition of ore containing Minerals and any other activity incidental thereto that may reasonably be required in connection therewith including, without limitation, the procurement and transportation of machinery, equipment, materials and supplies, and moving and stock-piling of waste.

“Environmental Liabilities” means any and all claims, actions, causes of action, damages, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, judgments, amounts paid in settlement, assessments, costs, disbursements, or expenses (including, without limitation, legal fees and costs, experts’ fees and costs, and consultants’ fees and costs) of any kind or of any nature whatsoever that are asserted against either Partner or the Partnership, by any person or entity other than the other Partner, alleging liability (including, without limitation, liability for studies, testing or investigatory costs, cleanup costs, response costs, removal costs, remediation costs, containment costs, restoration costs, corrective action costs, closure costs, reclamation costs, natural resource damages, property damages, business losses, personal injuries, penalties or fines) arising out of, based on or resulting from (i) the presence, release, threatened release, discharge or emission into the environment of any hazardous materials or substances existing or arising on, beneath or above the Project and/or emanating or migrating and/or threatening to emanate or migrate from the Project to off-site Project; (ii) physical disturbance of the environment caused by or relating to Operations; or (iii) the violation or alleged violation of any Environmental Laws arising from or relating to Operations.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		4

“Environmental Laws” means Laws aimed at reclamation or restoration of the Merian Gold Project or any other Project; abatement of pollution; protection of the environment; monitoring environmental conditions; protection of wildlife, including endangered species; ensuring public safety from environmental hazards; protection of cultural or historic resources; management, storage or control of hazardous materials and substances; releases or threatened releases of pollutants, contaminants, chemicals or industrial, toxic or hazardous substances into the environment, and all other Laws relating to the manufacturing, processing, distribution, use, treatment, storage, disposal, handling or transport of pollutants, contaminants, chemicals or industrial, toxic or hazardous substances or wastes.

“Money Laundering Laws” means the Republic of Suriname’s Act Disclosure of Unusual Transactions, and the Act Penalization of Money Laundering, and the United States’ Bank Secrecy Act, the United States’ Money Laundering Control Act of 1986, the United States’ Anti Terrorist Financing Act of 2001 and implementing regulations, and any similar U.S. federal, state or foreign law, regulation, convention.

“Environmental Compliance” means actions performed during or after Operations to comply with the requirements of applicable Environmental Laws or commitments in the Mineral Agreement related to reclamation of the Project or other compliance with Environmental Laws.

“Development” means all work that may reasonably be required in connection with the preparation of a Mine or the conduct of Mining including, but not limited to, engineering, design, the construction and installation of any related facilities, and the procurement of materials, tools, equipment and supplies.

“Option” has the meaning given thereto in the Mineral Agreement.

“Patriot Act” means the United States’ Patriot Act.

“Products” means all metals, ores, concentrates, Minerals, and mineral resources, including materials derived from the foregoing, produced from the Project under this Agreement.

“Program” means a description in reasonable detail of Operations to be conducted by the Managing Partner, as described in Article 10.

“Project” means all Operations conducted pursuant to Partnership Rights.

“Project Lands ” means all lands on or for the benefit of which Operations are permitted under any Partnership Rights.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		5

“Right of Exploitation ” means a right of exploitation for gold and other Minerals within the Area of Interest granted by the Republic of Suriname to Surgold pursuant to the Mining Act within the Area of Interest.

“Right of Exploration ” means any right of exploration for gold and other Minerals granted by the Republic of Suriname to Surgold pursuant to the Mining Act within the Area of Interest.

“Reserve” means a segregated account held by the Limited Partnership to which the Managing Partner has access in order to cover any shortfall in the capital of the Limited Partnership in its ability to pay its costs and expenses associated with any approved Program and Budget, in which there are at all times on deposit an amount at least equal to the average of two (2) months of the Limited Partner’s cash calls, which cash call amounts include but are not limited to provisions for sustainability of the Project, working capital, and capital expenditures. For purposes of calculating the Reserve, for the first year, the two (2) month average shall be based on the initial Program and Budget. Beginning with the second Program and Budget, and for each Program and Budget afterwards, the Reserve shall be recalculated using the prior Program and Budget.

“Royalty” means a royalty in the amount of six percent (6%) of the Net Smelter Returns (as defined in Attachment IV of the Mineral Agreement), of the sale or other disposition of all Minerals produced from the Project.

“Allocation” means the portion from the total gold production attributable to each Partner in proportion to its respective Participating Interest.

“Total Value ” means an amount equal to one and a half (1.5) times Historical Costs.

“Expansion of Existing Operations” means expansion of Operations contemplated in a given Program and Budget in which the Limited Partner’s share, based on its Participating Interest, exceeds fifty million US Dollars (US$ 50,000,000).

“Partner” and “Partners” mean Surgold and the NV 2, from and after the Effective Date.

For avoidance of doubt, no Partner shall have any Partnership Interest unless and until the Option is exercised and the Contribution Effective Date has occurred.

“Partnership Interest” means, for each Partner, its entire interest in the Partnership and the Partnership Rights, including its rights under this agreement and all rights to distributions from the Partnership.

“Partnership Rights” means, collectively, any Rights of Exploration and Rights of Exploitation that are granted by the Republic of Suriname to Surgold within the Area of Interest pursuant to the Mineral Agreement, or are issued to Affiliates of Surgold and transferred to Surgold and contributed for use by the Partnership in accordance with Section 15 of this agreement. Immediately after Surgold’s initial contribution pursuant to Section 5.1, the Partnership Rights will consist of the Merian Right of Exploitation and any Additional Rights.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		6

“Continuing Obligations” means obligations or responsibilities that are reasonably expected to continue or arise after Operations on a particular area of the Project have ceased or are suspended, including, but not limited to, Environmental Compliance.

“Indemnifying Partner ” has the meaning described in Subsection 2.4.1.

“Law” or “Laws” means the laws of the Republic of Suriname.

“Control” used as a verb means, when used with respect to an entity, the ability, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such entity through (i) the legal or beneficial ownership of voting securities or membership interests; (ii) the right to appoint managers, directors or corporate management; (iii) contract; (iv) operating agreement; (v) voting trust; or otherwise; and, when used with respect to a person, means the actual or legal ability to control the actions of another, through family relationship, agency, contract or otherwise; and “Control” used as a noun means an interest which gives the holder the ability to exercise any of the foregoing influences.

“Chargee” has the meaning as a holder of an Encumbrance as described in Section 14.4.

1.2 Terms not defined in Section 1.1 hereof but which are defined elsewhere in this agreement shall, unless otherwise specified or required by the context, have such defined meaning wherever used in this agreement.

1.3 Unless otherwise specified or required by the context, the use of the singular form in this agreement shall include a corresponding reference to the plural form and use of the masculine gender shall include a corresponding reference to the feminine and neuter genders.

Other grammatical variations and cognate expressions of any defined terms shall likewise be deemed to have a corresponding meaning.

1.4 A reference to a specified Article, Section, Subsection or other division shall, unless otherwise specified or required by the context, be construed as a reference to the relevant division of this agreement.

1.5 The division of this agreement into Articles, Sections, Subsections or other subdivisions and the insertion of headings are for convenience purposes only and shall not affect the interpretation of this agreement.

1.6 A reference or apparent reference by name to any legislation in this agreement shall, unless otherwise specified, be interpreted as a reference to the written law of the Republic of Suriname having the corresponding short title or name.

1.7 In this agreement, a covenant or an undertaking to perform a specified act or to perform an act for the attainment of a specified objective shall be deemed to include a covenant or an undertaking, as applicable, not to perform or to omit to perform such act as would be inconsistent with ‘the performance of such first mentioned act or the attainment of such first mentioned objective.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		7

1.8 The Partners hereby agree that the considerations as indicated in the recitals, leading up to the execution of this agreement as set forth in the Preamble are true, correct and accurate in all material respects.

1.9 Unless defined herein or unless otherwise indicated by the context, definitions of terms set forth in the Laws of the Republic of Suriname as are relevant to the subject matter hereof shall apply in the interpretation of corresponding terms used in this agreement.

2. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES, RECORD TITLE, INDEMNITIES

2.1 Representations and Warranties

2.1.1 Capacity of Partners

Each of Surgold and the NV 2 represents and warrants to the other as follows: (i) that it is an entity duly organized, qualified to transact business, and in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction and in the Republic of Suriname; (ii) that it has the full right, power and capacity to enter into and perform this agreement and all transactions contemplated herein, and all corporate, board of directors and other actions required to authorize it to enter into and perform this agreement have been properly taken; (iii) that it will not breach any other agreement or arrangement by entering into or performing this agreement, and this agreement has been duly executed and delivered by it and is valid and binding upon it in accordance with its terms; and (iv) that it has relied solely on its own appraisals and estimates as to the mineral potential of the Project, and upon its own geologic, engineering and other interpretations related thereto.

2.1.2 Representations and Warranties by Surgold

Surgold represents and warrants as follows:

(a)

Surgold has not entered into any other agreement with respect to its rights under the Merian Right of Exploration, that is currently valid and outstanding, and there are no leases or subleases or Encumbrances on such rights arising or created by, through or under Surgold, except the Royalty (as defined in and granted pursuant to the Mineral Agreement).

(b)

Except as to matters of record and the Royalty, no other person or entity is claiming an interest in, or in conflict with, the rights of Surgold under the Merian Right of Exploration, if and to the extent arising from actions by, through or under Surgold.

(c)

There are no actions, suits, claims, proceedings, litigation or investigations pending or threatened against it (i) that relate to the Project, or (ii) that could if continued adversely affect the ability of Surgold to fulfill its obligations under this agreement or the ability of NV 2 to exercise its rights under this agreement.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		8

2.2 Disclosures

Each of the Partners represents that it is not aware of any material facts or circumstances that have not been disclosed in this agreement, which should be disclosed to the other Partner in order to prevent the representations and warranties in this Agreement from being materially misleading, other than the Existing Royalties.

2.3 Loss of Title

2.3.1 Except only as otherwise provided in Subsections 2.3.2 or 2.4.2, any failure or loss of title to the Assets, and all costs of defending title thereto, shall be charged to each Partner in accordance with its Participating Interest.

2.3.2 All losses and costs referenced under Subsection 2.3.1 that arise out of or result from a breach of the representations and warranties of Surgold under Subsection 2.1.2 shall be charged to and paid by Surgold.

All losses and costs referenced under Subsection 2.3.1 arising out of or resulting from a breach of the Managing Partner’s obligations under Subsection 7.2(b) shall be charged to and paid by the Managing Partner.

2.4 Indemnities

2.4.1 Each Partner (“Indemnifying Partner”) shall indemnify the other Partner, its directors, officers, employees, agents and attorneys of Affiliates (collectively “Indemnified Partner”) against any loss, cost, expense, damage or liability (including legal fees and other expenses) arising out of or based on a breach by the Indemnifying Partner of any representation, warranty or covenant contained in this agreement.

2.4.2 If any claim or demand is asserted against an Indemnified Partner in respect of which such Indemnified Partner may be entitled to indemnification under this agreement, Notice of such claim or demand shall promptly be given to the Indemnifying Partner.

Without prejudice to the provisions of Subsection 2.4.1 above, the Indemnifying Partner shall have the right, but not the obligation, by notifying the Indemnified Partner within thirty (30) days after its receipt of the Notice of the claim or demand, to assume the entire control (subject to the right of the Indemnified Partner to participate at its own expense and with counsel of its own choice) of the defense, compromise, or settlement of a claim or demand.

Any damages to the Assets or business of the Indemnified Partner caused by a failure by the Indemnifying Partner to defend, compromise, or settle a claim or demand in a reasonable and expeditious manner requested by the Indemnified Partner, after the Indemnifying Partner has given Notice that it will assume control of the defense, compromise, or settlement of the matter, shall be included in the damages for which the Indemnifying Partner shall be obligated to indemnify the Indemnified Partner.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		9

Any settlement or compromise of a matter by the Indemnifying Partner shall include a full release of claims against the Indemnified Partner which has arisen out of the indemnified claim or demand.

2.5 Partnering Against Corruption

2.5.1 Each Partner represents, warrants and covenants to the other Partner that, as of the date hereof, it, nor any of its equity holders, beneficial owners, partners, officers, directors, employees or agents, shall, directly or indirectly, offer, pay, promise to pay, or authorize the payment of any money, or offer, give, promise to give, or authorize the giving of any financial or other advantage or anything else of value:

(a) to (1) any official or employee of any government, or any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, (2) any political party or official thereof, or to any candidate for political office, (3) any official or employee of any public international organization, or (4) any person acting in an official capacity for or on behalf of such government, department, agency, instrumentality, party, or public international organization, in each case for the purpose of influencing any act or decision of such party, or of such official, employee or candidate in his official capacity, or inducing such official, employee, party or candidate to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official, employee, party or candidate, or securing any improper advantage, or inducing such official, employee, party or candidate to use his or its influence with a government or instrumentality thereof to improperly or illegally affect or influence any act or decision of such government or instrumentality; or (b) to an officer, employee, agent, or representative of another company or organization, with the intent to influence or reward the recipient’s action(s) with respect to his company’s or organization’s business, or to gain a commercial benefit to the detriment of the recipient’s company or organization, or to induce or reward the improper performance of the recipient’s duties.

2.5.2 Each Partner hereby acknowledges that the Partnership seeks to comply with all applicable laws concerning money laundering and related activities.

In furtherance of those efforts, each Partner hereby represents, warrants and agrees that respectively, to the best of the Partner’s knowledge based upon such diligence and investigation as may be required under Money Laundering Laws: (i) none of the cash or property that a Partner has paid, will pay or will contribute to the Partnership has been or shall be directly or indirectly derived from, or related to, any activity that may contravene applicable laws and regulations, including the Money Laundering Laws; and (ii) no contribution or payment by a Partner to the Partnership shall cause the Partnership or the Managing Partner to be in violation of the Money Laundering Laws.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		10

2.5.3 Each Partner further represents, warrants and agrees that none of (a) the Partners; (b) the persons controlling or controlled by the Partner; (c) if the Partner is a privately held entity, the persons having a beneficial interest in the Partner; (d) if the Partner is not the beneficial owner of all of the Participating Interest, the persons having a beneficial interest in the Participating Interest; (e) the persons for whom the Partner is acting as agent, trustee, representative, intermediary or nominee or in any similar capacity in connection with this investment in the Participating Interest is(i) a government, country, territory, individual or entity with whom transactions are prohibited under any sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury; (ii) resides or has a place of business in, or is organized under the laws of or operating from, a country or territory that is subject to any sanctions administered by OFAC; (iii) a country or territory that has been designated as non-cooperative with international anti-money laundering principles or procedures by an intergovernmental group or organization such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), or has been designated by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States of America under the Patriot Act as warranting special measures due to money laundering concerns (any such country or territory: hereinafter called, a Non-cooperative Jurisdiction, or an entity or individual that resides or has a place of business in, or is organized under the laws of, a Non-cooperative Jurisdiction; or (iv) a senior foreign political figure or any immediate family or close associate of a senior foreign political figure.

2.5.4 Notwithstanding any other provision of the agreement, each Partner covenants that it will not transfer all or any part of its Participating Interest (or purport to do so), if such transfer will cause the Partnership to be in violation of the Money Laundering Laws or the Participating Interest to be held by a country, territory, individual or entity that is subject to any sanctions administered by OFAC.

2.5.5 Upon receipt by a Partner of information that, in its sole discretion, such Partner determines to be evidence of a breach by the other Partner of any undertakings in Sections 2.5.1, 2.5.2. 2.5.3, or 2.5.4, the Partners promptly shall meet to discuss the effect of such breach on the other Partner’s obligations under this agreement, including its representations and warranties under Section 2.5.1, and to attempt to resolve any concerns raised by such Partner.

3. NAME, PURPOSE AND TERM

3.1 General

Surgold and the NV 2 hereby enter into this agreement for the purposes hereinafter stated.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		11

All of the Partners’ rights and obligations in connection with the Assets and all Operations shall be subject to and governed by this agreement.

3.2 Name

The name of the Partnership is “Suriname Gold Project CV”. The Managing Partner shall conduct the business of the Partnership in the name of the Partnership.

The Managing Partner shall accomplish any registration required by applicable laws concerning assumed (trade)name and the protection thereof and similar laws.

3.3 Purpose

This agreement is entered into for the following purposes and for no others, and shall serve as the exclusive means by which the Partners, or either of them, accomplish such purposes:

(a)

to engage in Operations as permitted by Partnership Rights;

(b)

to perform any other operation or activity necessary, appropriate, or incidental to the foregoing; and

(c)

to acquire Rights of Exploration, Rights of Exploitation or Third Party Rights.

3.4 Limitation

Unless the Partners otherwise agree in writing, Partnership Operations shall be limited to the purposes described in Section 3.3, and nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to enlarge such purposes.

3.5 Term

Unless the Partnership is prematurely dissolved or otherwise terminated, as provided in this agreement, the term of this agreement and the Partnership is for as long as any Partnership Rights are held by the Partnership and thereafter until all materials, supplies, and equipment have been salvaged and disposed of, a final accounting has been made between the Partners, and any required Environmental Compliance has been completed and accepted by the appropriate governmental agencies.

3.6 Powers of the Partnership

The Partnership shall have any powers necessary and appropriate to the efficient and economic conduct of the business of the Partnership.

The ordinary business of the Partnership shall include without limitation:

(a)

utilizing and operating Assets in the Operations;

(b)

maintaining, protecting and preserving all Assets, including, but not limited to, real property, personal property, mining assets, processing assets, facilities, fixtures, equipment, trade secrets and other Confidential Information;


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		12

(c)

planning, organizing and contracting for the engineering, design, construction, Development, improvement or rehabilitation of any Assets reasonably necessary to the efficient and economical operations of the Partnership’s business;

(d)

purchasing, leasing or otherwise acquiring of real property or personal property and purchasing raw materials, supplies and other materials and such other Assets and services required for the efficient operation and management of the Partnership;

(e)

selling, conveying, leasing, assigning, transferring, condemning, abandoning, destroying or otherwise disposing of, in the ordinary course of business, real property, facilities, fixtures, equipment, supplies, materials or other Assets that are worn out, obsolete, or no longer useful;

(f)

defending and prosecuting lawsuits; settling and compromising claims; entering into, modifying, releasing, terminating or ratifying contracts and agreements; securing insurance covering insurable risks of the Partnership and of the Partnership’s interest in Assets, and adjusting losses and claims pertaining to such insurance;

(g)

opening, maintaining and drawing on bank accounts in the name of the Partnership; signing, accepting, endorsing and receiving notes, drafts, checks and bills of exchange; making disbursements from CV funds in the name of, and for the account of, the Partnership for costs and expenses incurred by the Partnership;

(h)

establishing and maintaining full, accurate and up to date books of account and financial and operating records that adequately describe the activities and business of the Partnership;

(i)

the acquisition, sale, termination, abandonment, and/or other disposition of Assets in the ordinary course of business; and

(j)

doing all acts and conducting all Operations for the effective implementation of this agreement

(k)

acquiring additional Rights of Exploration, Rights of Exploitation, or Third Party Rights.

4 RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTNERS

4.1 Partnership

Subject to satisfaction of the condition stated in Section 5.1, the Partnership is a limited partnership formed pursuant to Article 15 of the Code of Commerce of the Republic of Suriname, between Surgold, as the Managing Partner, and the NV 2, as the Limited Partner, through this agreement.

4.2 Liability

4.2.1 Surgold as the Managing Partner is severally liable for any third party debts of the Partnership (meaning that such third party can always claim the entire debt from Surgold) while the damages of the Limited Partner will be limited to the monies that it has contributed or is obligated to contribute.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		13

4.2.2 Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, both Partners shall have unlimited liability to each other with respect to damages caused to one another for each Partner’s acts or omissions.

4.3 Termination or Transfer of Rights to Assets

Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, neither Partner shall permit or cause all or any part of its interest in the Partnership or its Assets to be partitioned, divided, or otherwise terminated, by judicial means or otherwise.

If and insofar as allowed by law, the Partners hereby waive and release all rights of partition, or of sale in lieu thereof, or other division of Assets, including any such rights provided by any Law.

4.4 Implied Covenants

The implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing are the only implied covenants in this agreement.

No other implied covenants recognized under applicable Law shall be valid or enforceable with respect to this agreement.

4.5 No Third Party Beneficiary Rights

This agreement shall be construed to benefit the Partners and their respective successors and permitted assigns only, and shall not be construed to create third party beneficiary rights in any other party, governmental agency or organization, except as provided in Subsection 2.5.1.

5. CONTRIBUTIONS BY THE PARTNERS

5.1 Initial Contributions

As provided in the Mineral Agreement, the Republic of Suriname shall have the Option to participate in the Merian Gold Project up to at most twenty-five percent (25%) (the “Maximum Participating Interest”). By exercising the Option the right of participation shall be assumed to have been transferred to NV 2.

Upon the exercise of the Option:

5.1.1 the NV 2 shall make the Initial NV 2 Contribution to the Partnership, within ten (10) business days of the exercise of the Option, by wire transfer of immediately available US Dollars to the Partnership account, and upon such payment shall be deemed to have contributed the Initial NV 2 Contribution as its contribution to the Partnership.

5.1.2 upon the Partnership’s receipt of the Initial NV 2 Contribution, Surgold shall contribute for use by the Partnership, as its initial contribution: (i) all of Surgold’s rights under the Merian Right of Exploitation, (ii) all of Surgold’s rights under the Additional Rights, and (iii) the right to use of the Existing Data and the Assets listed in Exhibit C. Surgold shall execute and deliver such documents and instruments as are necessary to effect such contribution.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		14

Effective and conditional upon such initial contributions being made, the Partners shall acquire a Participating Interest in the Partnership.

The date on which the Initial NV 2 Contribution is received is referred to in this Agreement as the “Contribution Effective Date.”

5.1.3 For avoidance of doubt, if NV 2 fails to pay its Initial NV 2 Contribution within the time period set in 5.1.1, then the Venture is deemed to have never been effective, in which case neither Party will have any Participating Interest and this agreement will be null and void.

The Option may be exercised only once. If the Initial NV 2 Contribution is exercised for a Participating Interest that is less than the Maximum Participating Interest, it may not subsequently be exercised for any additional Participating Interest.

5.2 Deemed Value of Initial Contributions

Upon the payment by NV 2 of the Initial NV 2 Contribution, the value of the Initial NV 2 Contribution shall be the amount of the Initial NV 2 Contribution, and the value of Surgold’s initial contribution shall be an amount equal to the product of (i) the Total Value multiplied by (ii) the Participating Interest of Surgold.

5.3 Commencement of Joint Funding

At all times following the Contribution Effective Date, the Partners shall contribute funds required for Operations in proportion to their respective Participating Interests, subject to elections permitted in Article 10 (“Commencement of Joint Funding”).

6. PARTICIPATING INTERESTS

6.1 Participating Interests

6.1.1 Initial Participating Interest

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 of the Mineral Agreement, upon their respective initial contributions made pursuant to Section 5.1, the Partners shall have the following Participating Interests in the Partnership.

NV 2 : The Participating Interest that is a percentage determined by dividing the amount of the Initial NV 2 Contribution by the Total Value but in no event more than the Maximum NV 2 Participating Interest.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		15

Surgold : The Participating Interest that equals one hundred percent (100%) less the Participating Interest of the NV 2.

6.1.2 Changes in Participating Interests

A Partner’s Participating Interest shall only be changed as follows:

(a)

as provided in Section 6.2, in the event of an election of the Limited Partner to not fully participate in the funding of an Expansion of Existing Operations;

(b)

as provided Section 6.2, in the event that the Managing Partner elects to acquire Third Party Rights and the Limited Partner elects not to fully participate in such an acquisition of Third Party Rights as provided in Section 15.5;

(c)

as provided in Section 6.3, pursuant to Section 10.7;

(d)

upon withdrawal, pursuant to Article 12;

(e)

pursuant to a transfer by a Partner of all or a portion of its Participating Interest in accordance with Article 14; or

(f)

upon acquisition by either Partner of part or all of the Participating Interest of the other Partner, however arising; and

(g)

as provided in Section 6.3.

Following the Contribution Effective Date, the Managing Partner shall memorialize the Participating Interests of the Parties as established in accordance with Section 6.1.1.

6.2 Voluntary Reduction in Participation – Dilution

6.2.1 Subject to the notice requirement in Section 10.3, the Limited Partner may elect to not fully contribute to an Expansion of Existing Operations, or acquisition of Third Party Rights once the decision is made by the Surgold to engage in said Expansion of Existing Operations, or acquisition of Third Party Rights.

In such event, Surgold shall then have the option to fully fund the remaining portion of the Expansion of Existing Operations, or acquisition of Third Party Rights.

6.2.2 If Surgold elects to continue with the Expansion of Existing Operations, or acquisition of Third Party Rights it may upon request by the Limited Partner, but at its sole discretion, elect to treat all amounts advanced by it in respect of such Expansion of Existing Operations, or acquisition of Third Party Rights in excess of its Participating Interest, hereinafter called, the Excess Funding Amount, as either (i) additional contribution for its own account, and/or (ii) as a loan to the Limited Partner, hereinafter called, a Covering Loan.

If treated as a Covering Loan such Covering Loan may be up to twenty-five percent (25%) of the required capital contribution for the Expansion of Existing Operations, or acquisition of Third Party Rights, up to a maximum aggregate amount of fifty million United States Dollars (US$ 50,000,000) at any time outstanding, at a rate of interest of LIBOR plus seven percent (7%).Such Covering Loan will be repaid to Surgold with up to hundred percent (100%) of the Limited Partner’s Allocation until fully repaid.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		16

6.2.3 If Surgold elects to treat the Excess Funding Amount over and beyond the amount of any Covering Loan, if extended, as an additional contribution for its own account, then the Participating Interest of the Limited Partner shall be recalculated at the time of election by dividing the sum of (a) the deemed value of the Limited Partner’s Contribution as defined in Sections 5.2, plus (b) the total of all the Limited Partner’s previous contributions, by the sum of (a) and (b) above for all Partners, plus (c) the amount of the Expansion of Existing Operations, or acquisition of Third Party Rights, treated as an additional contribution for Surgold’s own account and multiplying the result by 100.

That is:


		(a) + (b) Limited Partner		X 100 = Recalculated Participating Interest The Participating
		(a) + (b) All Partner + (c)

Interest of Surgold shall thereupon become the difference between 100% and the recalculated Participating Interest of the Limited Partner.

As soon as practicable after the necessary information is available at the end of each period covered by an adopted Program and Budget, a recalculation of each Partner’s Participating Interest shall be made in accordance with the preceding formula to adjust, as necessary, the recalculations made at the beginning of such period to reflect actual contributions made by the Partners during the period.

Except as otherwise provided in this agreement, the Limited Partner shall retain all of its rights and obligations under this agreement, including the right to participate in future Expansion of Existing Operations, or acquisition of Third Party Rights at its recalculated Participating Interest.

If there are at any time Covering Loans outstanding to the Limited Partner, then such Covering Loans shall rank on a paripassu basis and all amounts that are to be applied to a Covering Loan in accordance with the immediately preceding sentence shall be applied to all such Covering Loans on a pro rata basis, in accordance with the outstanding principal amounts of such Covering Loans.

6.2.4 If Surgold advances funds for the account of the Limited Partner pursuant to Section 10.7, and such funds are not recovered by Surgold from Allocations to the Limited Partner, or otherwise repaid by the Limited Partner, within thirty (30) days after the date on which they are advanced, hereinafter called, Unrecovered Shortfall Advances, then the Participating Interests of the Partners shall be adjusted in accordance with the formula in Section 6.2.3, treating the Unrecovered Shortfall Advances as contributions for the account of Surgold.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		17

6.3 Default in Making Contributions

6.3.1 If the Limited Partner elects to contribute to an approved Expansion of Existing Operations, or acquisition of Third Party Rights and then defaults in making a contribution, or to the extent that any amounts advanced by Surgold pursuant to Section 10.7 are not repaid out of Allocations to the Limited Partner within thirty (30) days, or otherwise repaid by the Limited Partner, within thirty (30) days after the date on which they are advanced, Surgold may, but is not obligated to, advance the defaulted contribution on behalf of the Limited Partner and treat the same, together with any accrued interest, as a demand loan bearing interest from the date of the advance at the rate and on the terms provided in Section 6.2.2.

6.3.2 The Partners acknowledge that if the Limited Partner defaults in repaying a loan under Subsection 6.3.1, it will be difficult to measure the damages resulting from such default and the damage to Surgold could be significant.

In the event of such default, as reasonable liquidated damages, Surgold may, with respect to any such default not cured within thirty (30) days after Notice to the Limited Partner of such default, declare the Limited Partner in default, in which case the Limited Partner’s Participating Interest shall be shall be reduced by two times the amount that would otherwise be calculated pursuant to Section 6.2 in the case of an election under clause (i) of that Section, hereinafter called, Penalty Dilution.

If Surgold elects Penalty Dilution, the Limited Partner shall not thereafter be obligated to pay the monies due plus interest in accordance with Section 6.3.1.

6.4 Documentation of Participating Interest

Following the Contribution Effective Date, the Managing Partner shall prepare and provide to the Partners Exhibit D to this agreement, stating the Partners’ respective Participation Interest.

Following any change in the Participating Interests of the Partners, the Managing Partner shall prepare and deliver to the Partners an updated Exhibit D to this agreement reflecting the Participating Interest as changed.

6.5 Grant of Lien or Security Interest

6.5.1 Subject to Section 6.6, each Partner grants to the other Partner a lien upon and a security interest in its Participating Interest, including all of its rights, title and interest in the Assets and the Partner’s share of Products, whenever acquired or arising, and the proceeds from and accessions to the foregoing.

6.5.2 The liens and security interests granted by Subsection 6.5.1 shall secure every obligation or liability of the Partner granting such lien or security interest created under this agreement, including the obligation to repay a loan granted under Subsection 6.3.1.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		18

Each Partner hereby agrees to take all action necessary to perfect such lien and security interests and hereby appoints the other Partner, its attorney-in-fact, to execute, file and record all security documents necessary to perfect or maintain such lien and security interests.

6.6 Subordination of Interests

Each Partner shall, from time to time, take all necessary actions, including execution of appropriate agreements, to pledge and subordinate its Participating Interest, any liens it may hold which are created under this agreement, other than those created pursuant to Section 6.5 hereof, and any other right or interest it holds with respect to the Assets (other than any statutory lien of the Managing Partner) to any secured borrowings for Operations.

7. MANAGEMENT AND REPRESENTATION

7.1 Managing Partner

Subject to the restrictions imposed by this agreement, the Managing Partner shall have the full and exclusive power and authority on behalf of the Partnership to manage, control, administer and operate the business and affairs of the Partnership, to do or cause to be done any and all acts which it deems to be necessary or appropriate thereto, and generally to exercise all powers and authority of the Partnership set forth in Section 3.6 and of the powers and duties of the Managing Partner set forth in Section 7.2; provided, however, that the Managing Partner shall need the prior approval of the Limited Partner for decisions entailing a significant change in the identity or character of the Partnership or its business, and/or the Assets of the Partners used in connection therewith.

The lack of approval or consent of the Limited Partner in respect of such decisions cannot be invoked by and against third parties, nor does it affect the authority of the Managing Partner to represent the Partnership at law and otherwise.

7.2 Powers and Duties of the Managing Partner

Subject to the terms and provisions of this agreement, the Managing Partner shall have all necessary powers and authority to manage the affairs of the Partnership and conduct Operations.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Managing Partner shall have the powers and duties on behalf of the Partnership to:


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		19

(a)

manage, direct, and control Operations, including the Expansion of Existing Operations, and sell Products;

(i) purchase or otherwise acquire all material, supplies, equipment, water, utility and transportation services required for Operations, such purchases and acquisitions to be made on the best terms available as determined by the Managing Partner, taking into account all of the circumstances; and (ii) obtain such customary warranties and guarantees as are available in connection with such purchases and acquisitions;

(b)

(i) make or arrange for all payments and fulfill all obligations required to keep the Partnership Rights in good standing; and (ii) do all other acts reasonably necessary to maintain the Assets;

(c)

(i) apply for all necessary permits, licenses and approvals;

(ii) cause the Partnership to comply with Laws; and

(iii) prepare and file all reports or notices required for Operations; in the event of any violation of permits, licenses, Laws or approvals, the Managing Partner shall timely cure or dispose of such violation through performance, payment of fines and penalties, or both, and the cost thereof shall be charged to the Partnership;

(d)

initiate, prosecute and defend, all litigation or administrative proceedings arising out of Operations or brought by or against the Partnership, and shall provide Notice to the Limited Partner promptly of any material litigation, arbitration, or administrative proceeding commenced against the Partnership;

(e)

dispose of Assets, whether by sale, assignment, abandonment or other transfer, in the ordinary course of business, except that the Project may be abandoned or surrendered only as provided in Article 12;

(f)

keep and maintain all required accounting and financial records pursuant to the Accounting Procedure and in accordance with GAAP accounting procedures (or IFRS as provided for in Section 6.6 of the Mineral Agreement) consistently applied;

(g)

have the right to carry out its responsibilities hereunder through agents, Affiliates or independent contractors;

(h)

select and employ or cause to be employed at competitive rates all supervision and labor necessary or appropriate to all Operations hereunder; all persons employed, the number thereof, their hours of labor and their compensation shall be determined by the Managing Partner;

(i)

borrow monies from time to time and secure the payment of the sums so borrowed and to mortgage, pledge, or assign in trust all or any part of the Assets and to engage in any other means of financing customary in the mining industry;

(j)

keep the Strategy Committee advised of all Operations by submitting in writing to the Strategy Committee:


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		20

(i) quarterly progress summaries with acquired data and an annual report by each January 31;

(ii) copies of reports concerning Operations; and

(iii) such other reports as the Strategy Committee may reasonably request.

(k)

at all reasonable times provide the Strategy Committee or the Limited Partner access to, and the right to inspect and copy, all information acquired in Operations, including but not limited to, maps, drill logs, core tests, reports, surveys, assays, analyses, production reports, operations, technical, accounting and financial records;

(l)

allow the Strategy Committee or the Limited Partner, at its sole risk and expense, and subject to reasonable safety regulations, to inspect the Assets and Operations at all reasonable times, so long as the inspecting Partner does not unreasonably interfere with Operations;

(m)

arrange insurance in such amounts and of such nature as the Managing Partner deems necessary to protect the Assets and Operations of the Partnership;

(n)

perform or cause to be performed all assessment and other work;

(o)

timely record and file with the GMD and all other appropriate governmental office any required documents in sufficient detail to reflect compliance with the applicable requirements;

(p)

prepare and present, following Commencement of Joint Funding, to the Limited Partner the Programs and Budgets as provided in this agreement;

(q)

perform Continuing Obligations when and as necessary, in an economic and appropriate manner;

(r)

delegate performance of Continuing Obligations to persons having demonstrated skill and experience in relevant disciplines;

(s)

specify, as part of each Program and Budget submittal, the measures to be taken for performance of Continuing Obligations and the cost of such measures;

(t)

keep the Limited Partner reasonably informed about the Managing Partner’s efforts to discharge Continuing Obligations;

(u)

provide access to authorized members of each Partner to the Project to inspect work directed toward satisfaction of Continuing Obligations and audit books, records, and accounts related thereto;

(v)

have authority in emergency operating situations to take whatever action as it deems necessary if the failure to act would materially prejudice the operations of the Partnership or the interests of the Partners;

(w)

have authority to acquire Rights of Exploration, Rights of Exploitation, or Third Party Rights; and

(x)

in addition, also undertake all other activities reasonably necessary to fulfill the foregoing obligations.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		21

7.3 Rights and Obligations of the NV 2

The NV 2 shall take no part in the Operation, management, or control of the Partnership business, transact any business in the Partnership’s name, or have the power to sign documents for or otherwise bind the Partnership.

7.4 Standard of Care

The Managing Partner shall discharge its duties pursuant to this agreement and conduct all Operations in a good, workmanlike and efficient manner, in accordance with sound mining, environmental and other applicable industry standards and practices, and in material compliance with the terms and provisions of rights, leases, licenses, permits, contracts and other agreements pertaining to Assets.

The Managing Partner shall not be liable to the Partnership or the Limited Partner for any act or omission resulting in damage, loss, cost, penalty or fine to the Partnership or Limited Partner, except to the extent caused by or attributable to the Managing Partner’s willful misconduct or gross negligence.

In the absence of willful misconduct or gross negligence on the part of the Managing Partner, or any officer or employee of the Managing Partner with authority to act, the Partnership will save the Managing Partner harmless from and against any and all claims (and the costs and expenses of defending them) in connection with the activities of the Managing Partner under this agreement.

The Managing Partner shall not be in default of its duties under this agreement if its inability to perform results from the failure of the Limited Partner to perform acts or to contribute amounts required of it by this agreement.

7.5 Transactions With Affiliates

If the Managing Partner engages Affiliates to provide services hereunder, it shall do so on terms no less favorable to the Partnership than would be the case with unrelated persons in Arm’s-Length Transactions.

7.6 Control of Operations

The Managing Partner shall maintain complete control over employees assigned to the Partnership and all of its contractors and subcontractors with respect to performance of the Operations.

Nothing contained in this agreement or any contract awarded by the Managing Partner shall create any contractual relationship between any contractor and the Limited Partner.

The Managing Partner shall have complete control over and supervision of Operations and shall direct and supervise the same so as to ensure their conformity with this agreement.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		22

8. STRATEGY COMMITTEE

8.1 Strategy Committee

The purpose of the Strategy Committee will be to consider strategic policy of the Partnership.

The Strategy Committee may advise the Managing Partner with respect to policy making matters for the Partnership, and provide the Managing Partner with its opinion and advice whether or not solicited by the Managing Partner.

8.2 Membership

The Strategy Committee shall consist of two (2) members appointed by the Managing Partners and two (2) members appointed by the Limited Partner.

One of the members appointed by the Managing Partner shall act as chairman of the committee.

Each Partner shall select its own members with the training, skills and experience necessary to evaluate and make recommendations to the Strategy Committee.

Each Partner may appoint one or more alternates to act and vote in the absence of a regular member.

Any alternate so acting shall be deemed a member.

Appointments shall be made or changed by prior Notice to the other.

8.3 Meetings

The Strategy Committee shall hold regular meetings at least annually, at the call of the Managing Partner.

The meetings shall be held in Paramaribo, Suriname unless otherwise agreed by the Partners.

The Managing Partner shall give thirty (30) days Notice to the members of the Strategy Committee of such regular meetings (unless such Notice is waived by the Partners).

Each Notice of a meeting shall include an itemized agenda prepared by the Managing Partner, but any matter may be considered with the consent of all Partners.

The Managing Partner shall provide all members on the Strategy Committee with any supplemental information that the Managing Partner deems necessary or is reasonably requested by the Limited Partner no later than eight (8) days in advance of the meeting.

Any member of the Strategy Committee may participate in meetings by telephone conference or similar communication by means of which all persons participating in the meeting can hear and speak to each other.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		23

8.4 Quorum

There shall be a quorum for a meeting of the Strategy Committee if at least one member representing each Partner is present; provided, however, that in the event that a quorum does not exist at any such meeting, any Partner may reschedule the meeting, at a time at least two (2) days following the originally scheduled meeting but no later than seven (7) days following the originally scheduled meeting. At such rescheduled meeting, there shall be a quorum if at least one member representing any Partner is present.

8.5 Decisions

All decisions of the Strategy Committee will require unanimous approval of its members; provided, however that in the event such unanimous approval is not possible, the member acting as chairman shall have the deciding vote of the Strategy Committee.

8.6 Minutes

The Managing Partner shall prepare minutes of all meetings and shall distribute copies of such minutes to the other members within thirty (30) days after the meeting.

The members shall have thirty (30) days after receipt to sign and return such copies or to provide any written comments on such minutes to the Managing Partner.

If a member timely submits written comments on such minutes, the Strategy Committee shall seek, for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days, to agree upon minutes of such meeting acceptable to its members.

At the end of such period, failing agreement by the members on revised minutes, the minutes of the meeting shall be the original minutes as prepared by the Managing Partner, together with the comments on the minutes made by the other members.

These documents shall be placed in the minutes book maintained by the Managing Partner.

8.7 CV Interests

At all meetings of the Strategy Committee, the members in their deliberations and decisions shall take into account and promote the best interests of the Partnership.

9. PARTNERS’ MEETINGS

9.1 Meetings

The Partners shall hold regular meetings during the first quarter of every calendar year, or special meetings at any other time, in order for the Managing Partner to:

(a)

report on the business of the Partnership during the preceding financial year and present the audited financial statements of the Partnership for such period;

(b)

present Programs or Programs and Budgets;


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		24

(c)

present forecasts of Allocations, distributions of cash, and Operations, including additional Asset purchases, future Expansions of Existing Operations, mine expansions, maintenance of equipment and facilities and Continuing Obligations; and

(d)

discuss all other business of the Partnership that may be required.

Regular meeting shall be held at the call of the Managing Partner.

Special meetings may be held at the call of any Partner.

The meetings shall be held in Paramaribo, Suriname unless otherwise agreed by the Partners.

The Managing Partner shall be the chairman of all regular and special meetings.

The Partner calling the meeting shall give thirty (30) days Notice to the other Partner (unless such Notice is waived by the Partners).

Each Notice of a meeting shall include an itemized agenda prepared by the Partner calling the meeting, but any matter may be considered with the consent of all Partners.

The Managing Partner shall provide the Limited Partner with any supplemental information which the Managing Partner deems necessary or is reasonably requested by the Limited Partner no later than eight (8) days in advance of the meeting.

9.2 Quorum

There shall be a quorum for a Partner’s meeting if one (1) representative of each Partner is present; provided, however, that in the event that a quorum does not exist at any such meeting, any Partner may reschedule the meeting, at a time at least two (2) days following the originally scheduled meeting but no later than seven (7) days following the originally scheduled meeting, and, at such rescheduled meeting, there shall be a quorum if at least one (1) representative from any of the Partners is present.

9.3 Decisions

All decisions of the Partners’ meeting require the unanimous approval of the Partners, provided, however, that in the event that such unanimous approval is not reached, the Managing Partner shall call for a second Partner’s meeting to be held on the following day of the meeting at which such unanimous approval was not reached, and in such second Partners’ meeting the decisions will be approved with the vote of Partners holding a Participating Interest of more than fifty percent (50%).

9.4 Minutes

Minutes of each Partner’s Meeting shall be prepared pursuant to the procedure described in Section 8.6.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		25

10. PROGRAMS AND BUDGETS

10.1. Operations Pursuant to Programs and Budgets

Upon Commencement of Joint Funding, Operations shall be conducted, expenses shall be incurred, and Assets shall be acquired only pursuant to a Program and Budget approved pursuant to Section 10.2.

Every Program and Budget adopted pursuant to this agreement shall provide for accrual of reasonably anticipated Environmental Compliance expenses for all Operations contemplated under the Program and Budget.

For avoidance of doubt, the initial Program and Budget shall include all Historical Costs related to the Merian Right of Exploration, Merian Right of Exploitation and all Additional Rights to the extent not included in the Total Value (as defined in the Mineral Agreement), including specifically all Historical Costs incurred after the date of issuance of the Merian Right of Exploitation but before Commencement of Joint Funding.

10.2 Presentation of Programs and Budgets

Proposed Programs and Budgets shall be prepared by the Managing Partner and shall be for six (6) month periods or any longer periods not to exceed one (1) year.

Notwithstanding whether a portion of a previous period’s Program and Budget is being carried forward to fund activities continuing beyond the current year, at least thirty (30) days prior to the annual meeting of the Partners’ Meeting, a proposed Program and Budget for the succeeding period shall be prepared by the Managing Partner and submitted to the Partners.

Within ten (10) days of receipt of the proposed Program and Budget, the Partners may submit written comments to the Managing Partner detailing revisions or modifications that they would like to have made to the proposed Program and Budget.

If such written comments are received, the Managing Partner, working with the other Partner, shall seek for a period of time not to exceed fifteen (15) days to develop a revised Program and Budget acceptable to both Partners; provided, however, that each Program and Budget shall be in the sole determination of the Managing Partner.

The Managing Partner shall submit any revised proposed Program and Budget to the Partners at its sole discretion, at least five (5) days prior to the annual meeting of the Partners.

10.3 Election to Participate in Expansions of Operations or Acquisition of Third Party Rights

The Managing Partner shall provide the Partners with no less than six (6) months prior notice of any proposed Expansion of Existing Operations or Acquisition of Third Party Rights.

By Notice to the Managing Partner within thirty (30) days after the presentment of an estimated cost of such Expansion of Existing Operations or Acquisition of Third Party Rights, each Partner must make its election to participate in such Expansion of Existing Operations.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		26

If a Partner fails to provide Notice to the Managing Partner under this Section 10.3, such Partner will be deemed to have elected to contribute to such Expansion of Existing Operations or Acquisition of Third Party Rights in proportion to its Participating Interest.

10.4 Budget Overruns; Program Changes

The Managing Partner shall immediately notify the NV 2 of any material departure from an adopted Program and Budget.

If the Managing Partner exceeds the total of an adopted Budget by more than ten percent (10%), then the excess over ten percent (10%), unless directly caused by an emergency or unexpected expenditure made pursuant to Section 10.5, shall be for the sole account of the Managing Partner.

Budget overruns of ten percent (10%) or less shall be borne by the Partners in proportion to their respective Participating Interests as of the time the overrun occurs.

10.5 Emergency Expenditures

In case of emergency, the Managing Partner may take any action it deems necessary to protect life, limb or property, to protect the Assets or to comply with Law.

The Managing Partner may also make reasonable expenditures on behalf of the Partners for unexpected events that are beyond its reasonable control.

In the case of an emergency or unexpected expenditure, the Managing Partner shall promptly notify the Partners of the expenditure, and the Managing Partner shall be reimbursed therefore by the Partners in proportion to their respective Participating Interests at the time the emergency or unexpected expenditure is incurred.

10.6 Cash Calls

On the basis of adopted Programs and Budgets, the Managing Partner shall submit to each Partner, on the first (1st) day of previous month, a billing for estimated cash and Environmental Compliance fund requirements for the next month.

Within thirty (30) days after receipt of each billing, or a billing made pursuant to Section 10.5, each Partner shall advance to the Managing Partner forty percent (40%) of its proportionate share of the estimated amount with the remaining sixty percent (60%) of its share due within fifteen (15) days after the due date for the first installment.

Time is of the essence for payment of such billings.

10.7 Limited Partner’s Failure to Meet Cash Calls

In the event that the Limited Partner fails to meet a cash call in the amount and at the times specified in Section 10.6 to support an approved Program and Budget, the Managing Partner shall access the Reserve to obtain funds necessary to make up the shortfall in the Limited Partner’s contribution.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		27

If the amount of funds in the Reserve is insufficient to cover the shortfall in the Limited Partner’s contribution, the Limited Partner shall (i) immediately contribute to the Partnership the amount of such shortfall and (ii) replenish the Reserve within thirty (30) days.

If the Limited Partner fails to cover the shortfall, the Managing Partner may, but shall not be required to, advance funds in the amount of the shortfall on the Limited Partner’s behalf.

Any amount so advanced by the Managing Partner shall be repaid out of Allocations to the Limited Partner.

If amounts advanced are not repaid out of such Allocations, and not otherwise repaid by the Limited Partner, within thirty (30) days after the date on which the advance was made, then the Percentage Interest of the Limited Partner shall be subject to dilution in accordance with Section 6.3.

11. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND CASH DISTRIBUTIONS

11.1 Fiscal year

The financial year of the Partnership shall be the calendar year.

11.2 Financial Statements and Audits

At the regular partners’ meeting, the Managing Partner shall present the audited financial statements of the Partnership to the Partners.

(a)

Audit

The audit should be carried out by accountants / auditors who are members of an internationally recognized professional organization.

The audit report shall be prepared in duplicate and sent to each Company prior to the s regular Partners meeting.

The cost of the audit shall be borne by the Partnership.

(b)

Claims

All exceptions to the audit and claims upon the Managing Partner for discrepancies disclosed by such audit shall be made in writing not later than three (3) months after receipt of the audit report by the Limited Partner.

Failure to make such exceptions or claims within the three (3) month period shall (i) mean that the audit is correct and binding upon the Partners and (ii) result in a waiver of any right to make claims upon the Managing Partner for discrepancies disclosed by the audit.

(c)	Independent audit


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		28

In addition the Limited Partner shall have the right to conduct an independent audit of all books, records and accounts, at its expense, and which audit right will be limited to a period of not more than twelve (12) months after the respective calendar year has ended.

All exceptions to and claims upon the Managing Partner for discrepancies disclosed by such audit shall be made in writing within three (3) months after completion or delivery of such audit, but in any event within twelve (12) months after the respective calendar year has ended, or they shall be deemed waived.

The time limits provided in Subsections 11.2(b) and 11.2(c) shall not apply in cases involving fraud and/or gross negligence.

11.3 Partnership Costs and Distribution of Allocation

11.3.1 Partnership Costs

Each Partner shall be billed twice a month for its portion of the previous month’s Partnership costs and expenses and within fifteen (15) days after receipt of each billing, each Partner shall advance to the Managing Partner forty percent (40%) of its proportionate share of the estimated amount with the remaining sixty percent (60%) of its share due within fifteen (15) days after the due date for the first installment, provided that to the extent that the Limited Partner does not remit its proportionate share of costs and expenses within thirty (30) days, the Managing Partner may deduct from the Reserve the Limited Partner’s Allocation or share of cash distributions, if any, the funds or amounts required to cover such costs and expenses.

Billings of Partnership cost and expenses shall be reconciled with actual costs periodically as determined by the Managing Partner.

Time is of the essence for payment of such billings.

11.3.2 Allocations

Each Partner shall open a bullion storage account at each refinery or mint designated by the Managing Partner as a recipient of an Allocation.

Each Partner shall be solely responsible for all costs and liabilities associated with maintenance of such account or accounts, and the Managing Partner shall not be required to bear any additional expense with respect to such “in-kind” payments.

On or before the twenty fifth (25 ^th ) day of each calendar month the Managing Partner shall deliver written instructions to the refinery or mint, with a copy to each Partner, directing the refinery or mint to deposit a percentage of the refined bullion that resulted from the Monthly Production, equal to the Participating Interest of each Partner, to each Partner’s account or accounts.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		29

Title to refined bullion delivered to each Partner under this agreement shall pass to each Partner at the time such bullion is credited to each Partner’s account or accounts at the refinery or mint.

11.3.3 Cash Distributions

The Managing Partner shall present any proposed distributions of Partnership cash at the regular Partner’s meeting.

Whenever the Partnership is to pay any sum to any Partner, any amounts that such Partner owes the Partnership may be deducted by the Managing Partner from that sum before payment and credited to the Partnership.

The distribution shall be done pro rata in accordance with the respective Participating Interests, simultaneously to both Partners.

12. WITHDRAWAL AND TERMINATION

12.1 Termination by Agreement

The Partners may terminate the Partnership at any time by written agreement.

12.2 Failure of the Republic of Suriname to Exercise the Option

If the Republic of Suriname fails to exercise the Option or after the Option has been exercised, NV2 fails to make the Initial Contribution within the time period provided in the Mineral Agreement, then this agreement shall have no force or effect on the Parties and the Managing Partner and, for the avoidance of doubt, the NV 2 shall not acquire any rights or interest in the Merian Rights of Exploration or Exploitation, any Additional Rights or other Assets.

12.3 Withdrawal and Termination

Either Partner may elect to withdraw as a Partner and Participant from the Partnership upon the later of not less than sixty (60) days Notice to the other Partner, or the end of the then current Program and Budget.

Upon such withdrawal, the Partnership shall terminate, and the withdrawing Partner shall be deemed to have transferred to the remaining Partner, without cost and free and clear of royalties, liens or other Encumbrances arising by, through or under such withdrawing Partner, except those to which all Partners have given their written consent after the Effective Date of this agreement, all of its entire Partnership Interest.

12.4 Disposition of Assets on Termination

Promptly after termination under Section 12.1 or failure to exercise the Option as described in Section 12.2, the Managing Partner shall take all action necessary to wind up the activities of the Partnership and to dispose of or distribute the Assets, and all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the termination of the Partnership shall be expenses chargeable to the Partnership.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		30

13. TAXES

13.1 General

Each Partner shall be directly responsible for and shall directly pay all taxes applicable to Partnership revenues allocable to such Partner and received by it.

In particular, each Partner shall individually file its tax returns with the proper authorities and independently file claims for and recover any income tax credits.

A Partner’s decisions with respect to such tax matters shall not have any binding effect on the course of actions taken by the other Partner.

13.2 US Tax Matters

The Partners intent that CV will be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and no Partner shall take any action to alter such treatment.

At the request of Surgold, the Partnership shall file an election to be treated as a partnership for such purposes from the date of formation of the Partnership, and each Partner shall cooperate in effecting such election.

Surgold shall be authorized to prepare and file for the Partnership U.S. federal income tax elections and U.S. federal income tax returns.

14. TRANSFER OF INTEREST

14.1 General

A Partner shall have the right to transfer to any third party all or any part of its interest in or to this agreement, its Participating Interest, or the Assets solely as provided in this Section 14.

For the purposes of this Section 14 the word “transfer” shall mean: to convey, sell, assign, grant an option, create an Encumbrance or in any manner transfer or alienate, but excluding and excepting alienation done for the purposes of obtaining financing pursuant to Section 14.4.

In addition, the NV 2 acknowledges that transfers or issuances of equity interests in the NV 2 are subject to the restrictions stated in the Mineral Agreement.

14.2 Limitations on Free Transferability

The transfer right of a Partner in Section 14.1 shall be subject to the following terms and conditions:


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		31

(a)

no transferee of all or part of any Participating Interest shall have the rights of a Partner unless and until the transferring Partner has provided to the other Partner Notice of the transfer, and the transferee, as of the effective date of the transfer, has committed in writing to be bound by this agreement to the same extent and nature as the transferring Partner;

(b)

no transfer permitted by this Section 14 shall relieve the transferring Partner of its share of any liability, whether accruing before or after such transfer, which arises out of Operations conducted prior to such transfer;

(c)

neither Partner, without the consent of the other, shall make a transfer that would violate any Law, or result in the cancellation of any permits, licenses, or other similar authorizations;

(d)

the transferring Partner and the transferee shall bear all tax consequences of the transfer;

(e)

such transfer shall be subject to a preemptive right in the other Partner as provided in Section 14.3;

(f)

in the event of a transfer of less than all of a Participating Interest, the transferring Partner and its transferee shall act and be treated as one Partner and shall be jointly and severally liable for all obligations of that Partner, and in such event in order for the transfer to be effective, the transferring Partner and its transferee shall provide written Notice to the non-transferring Partner designating a sole authorized agent to act on behalf of their collective Participating Interest.

Such Notice shall provide that (i) the agent has the sole authority to act on behalf of, and to bind the transferring Partner and its transferee on all matters pertaining to this agreement or the Partnership, (ii) the notified Partner may rely on all decisions of, Notices and other communications from, and failures to respond by, the agent, as if given (or not given) by the transferring Partner and its transferee; and (iii) all decisions of, Notices and other communications from, and failures to respond by, the notified Partner to the agent shall be deemed to have been given (or not given) to the transferring Partner and its transferee;

(g)

any transferee of Surgold’s Participating Interest shall be technically and financially competent, and acceptable to the NV 2, whose acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed;

(h)

any transferee of the Participating Interest of NV 2 shall be financially competent.

14.3 Right of First Refusal

14.3.1 Except in the event of (a) an assignment to a wholly-owned subsidiary of the NV 2, or (b) a merger, or (c) a sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of NV 2, if the NV 2 has the intention to assign all or any part of its rights under this agreement, Surgold shall have a first right of refusal, hereinafter called, Right of First Refusal, to acquire such rights or interests, and the NV 2 shall notify Surgold in writing of this intention and of the conditions on which it wishes to proceed.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		32

The notice shall state the price and all other pertinent terms and conditions of the intended transfer, and shall be accompanied by a copy of the offer or contract for sale.

If the consideration for the intended transfer is, in whole or in part, other than monetary, the notice shall describe such consideration and its monetary fair market value in United States currency.

The Right of First Refusal shall last for a period of sixty (60) days from the day of the receipt by Surgold of such notification.

If Surgold does not elect to acquire the rights and/or interests offered under the aforesaid conditions, the NV 2 shall be entitled to assign to third parties said rights and/or shares, however, not on more favorable conditions than those offered to Surgold.

If Surgold elects to exercise its Right of First Refusal, it shall then have ninety (90) days in which to complete the purchase.

14.3.2 If Surgold fails to so elect within the period provided for in Subsection 14.3.1, the NV 2 shall have ninety (90) days following the expiration of such period to consummate the transfer to a third party at a price and on terms no less favorable to the NV 2 than those set forth in the notice required in Subsection 14.3.1.

14.3.3 If the NV 2 fails to consummate the transfer to a third party within the period set forth in Subsection 14.3.2, the Right of First Refusal of Surgold in such offered interest shall be deemed to be revived and effective.

Any subsequent proposal for transfer of such charges and interests will be executed in accordance with all procedures indicated in this Section 14.3.

14.3.4 Except in the event of (a) a corporate reorganization, (b) a merger or (c) the sale or transfer of all or substantially all of Surgold’s assets, if Surgold has the intention to assign all or any part of its rights under this agreement, the NV 2 shall have a Right of First Refusal to acquire such rights or interests, and Surgold shall notify the NV 2 in writing of this intention and of the conditions on which it wishes to proceed.

The notice shall state the price and all other pertinent terms and conditions of the intended transfer, and shall be accompanied by a copy of the offer or contract for sale.

If the consideration for the intended transfer is, in whole or in part, other than monetary, the notice shall describe such consideration and its monetary fair market value in United States currency.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		33

The Right of First Refusal shall last for a period of sixty (60) days from the day of the receipt by the NV 2 of such notification.

If the NV 2 does not elect to acquire the rights and/or interests offered under the aforesaid conditions, Surgold shall be entitled to assign to third parties said rights and/or shares, however, not on more favorable conditions than those offered to the NV 2.

If the NV 2 elects to exercise its Right of First Refusal, it shall then have ninety (90) days in which to complete the purchase.

14.3.5 If the NV 2 fails to so elect within the period provided for in Subsection 14.3.4, Surgold shall have ninety (90) days following the expiration of such period to consummate the transfer to a third party at a price and on terms no less favorable to Surgold than those set forth in the notice required in Subsection 14.3.4.

14.3.6 If Surgold fails to consummate the transfer to a third party within the period set forth in Subsection 14.3.5, the Right of First Refusal of the NV 2 in such offered interest shall be deemed to be revived and effective.

Any subsequent proposal for transfer of such charges and interests will be executed in accordance with all procedures indicated in this Section 14.3.

14.4 Encumbrances

Neither Partner shall pledge, mortgage, or otherwise create an Encumbrance on its interest in this agreement or the Assets except for the purpose of securing project financing relating to the Project, including its share of funds for Development or Mining costs and in such event both Partners, acting reasonably, shall agree to the terms and conditions of such Encumbrance

The right of a Partner to grant such Encumbrance shall be subject to the condition that the holder of the Encumbrance (“Chargee”) first enter into a written agreement with the other Partner, in a form acceptable to that Partner, acting reasonably, which provides:

(a)	the Chargee shall not enter into possession or institute any proceedings for foreclosure or partition of the encumbering Partner’s Participating Interest except as provided in Section 14.4 sub (b) and that such Encumbrance shall be subject to the provisions of this agreement;

(b)

the Chargee’s remedies under the Encumbrance shall be limited to the sale of the whole (but only of the whole) of the encumbering Partner’s Participating Interest to the other Partner, or, failing such a sale, at a public auction to be held at least forty-five (45) days after prior Notice to the other Partner, such sale to be subject to the purchaser entering into a written agreement with the other Partner whereby such purchaser assumes all obligations of the encumbering Partner under the terms of this agreement.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		34

The price of any preemptive sale to the other Partner shall be the remaining principal amount of the loan plus accrued interest and related expenses, and such preemptive sale shall occur within sixty (60) days of the Chargee’s Notice to the other Partner of its intent to sell the encumbering Partner’s Participating Interest.

Failure of a sale to the other Partner to close by the end of such period, unless failure is caused by the encumbering Partner or by the Chargee, shall permit the Chargee to sell the encumbering Partner’s Participating Interest at a public sale; and

(c)	the charge shall be subordinate to any then-existing debt, including project financing previously approved by the Managing Partner encumbering the transferring Partner’s Participating Interest.

15. ACQUISITIONS WITHIN AREA OF INTEREST

15.1 If during the period commencing on the Commencement of Joint Funding throughout the term of the Agreement, hereinafter called, the Expansion Period, Surgold, acquires any Right of Exploration, Right of Exploitation, or Third Party Rights located wholly or partially within the Area of Interest, such Right of Exploration, Right of Exploitation, or Third Party Rights automatically shall be deemed to have been contributed for use by the Partnership and shall constitute Partnership Rights.

If during the Expansion Period any Affiliate of Surgold acquires any Right of Exploration, Right of Exploitation, or Third Party Rights located wholly or partially within the Area of Interest, Surgold as the case may be, shall promptly cause such Right of Exploration, Right of Exploitation, or Third Party Rights to be transferred to Surgold as the case may be, for contribution for use by the Partnership.

15.2 Neither NV 2 nor its Affiliate(s) shall acquire any Right of Exploration, Right of Exploitation, or Third Party Rights either wholly or partially within the Area of Interest.

In the event that NV 2 or its Affiliate(s) acquires any Right of Exploration, Right of Exploitation, or Third Party Rights within the Area of Interest, it shall, or it shall immediately cause its Affiliate(s) as the case may be, to offer to transfer such Right of Exploration, Right of Exploitation, or Third Party Rights to Surgold.

Surgold may, but shall have no obligation to, accept any such offer.

If it accepts such offer, the NV 2 shall transfer, or cause to be transferred, to Surgold such rights for the administrative transfer fee only (which shall be multiplied by Surgold’s Participating Interest), and Surgold shall contribute such rights for use by the Partnership. If Surgold does not accept such offer, the Partnership shall not acquire or be deemed to have acquired any such rights.

In no event shall any adjustment to the Participating Interests of any Partner result from or be effected with respect to any Rights of Exploration, Rights of Exploitation or Third Party Rights subject to this Section 15.2, regardless of whether they are transferred to the Partnership.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		35

15.3 Within thirty (30) days after a Notice of intent to acquire any Right of Exploration, Right of Exploitation, or Third Party Rights located wholly or partially within the Area of Interest, the acquiring Partner shall notify the other Partner of such acquisition by it or its Affiliate.

The acquiring Partner’s Notice shall describe in detail the acquisition, the rights, minerals, and assets covered thereby, the costs thereof, and the reasons why the acquiring Partner believes that the acquisition is in the best interests of the Partnership.

In addition to such Notice, the acquiring Partner shall make any and all information concerning the acquired interest available for inspection by the other Partner.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, any acquisition within the Area of Interest by NV 2 prior to the Date of the Initial NV 2 Contribution shall require the prior written consent of Surgold.

15.4 If, within thirty (30) days after receiving the acquiring Partner’s Notice, the other Partner notifies the acquiring Partner of its election to fund its proportionate interest in the acquired interest equal to its Participating Interest, the acquiring Partner shall convey to the other Partner such a proportionate undivided interest therein and the acquired interest shall become a part of the Properties for the purposes of this Agreement immediately upon payment to the acquiring Partner of the other Partner’s proportionate share of actual out-of-pocket acquisition costs equal to such other Partner’s Participating Interest.

Provided, however, in the event of any acquisition by Surgold within the Area of Interest prior to the Contribution Effective Date, all out-of-pocket acquisition costs shall be borne by Surgold and calculated as Historical Cost.

15.5 If the other Partner does not give Notice within the thirty (30) day period set forth above, or in the alternative gives Notice within such thirty (30) day period that it does not wish to participate in the acquisition, its Participating Interest shall be diluted under the provisions of Section 6.2.

16 GENERAL PROVISIONS

16.1 Notices

All Notices, payments and other required communications (“Notice” or “Notices”) to the Partners shall be in writing, and shall be given (i) by personal delivery to the Partner, or (ii) by electronic communication, with a confirmation sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or (iii) by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested.

All Notices shall be effective and shall be deemed delivered (i) if by personal delivery on the date of delivery, (ii) if by electronic communication on the date of receipt of the electronic communication or the next business day if the date of receipt is not a business day, and (iii) if solely by mail on the day delivered as shown on the actual receipt.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		36

A Partner may change its address from time-to-time by Notice to the other Partner.


TO: NV 2		Attn.: the General Manager

		Paramaribo, Suriname, South America

		Telephone:

		Fax:

TO: SURGOLD		Attn.: Branch Manager Suriname Gold Company LLC Surinamestraat 54 Paramaribo, Suriname Telephone: 597-402892 Fax: 597-402893

		Copy to: Newmont Mining Corp. Attn.: Land Department 6363 South Fiddler’s Green Circle Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 U.S.A. Telephone: 1 303-837-5775 Fax: 1 303-837-5851

16.2 Waiver

The failure of a Partner to insist on the strict performance of any provision of this agreement or to exercise any right, power or remedy upon a breach hereof shall not constitute a waiver of any provision of this agreement or limit the Partner’s right thereafter to enforce any provision or exercise any right.

16.3 Modification

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no modification of this agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and duly executed by the Partners.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		37

16.4 Force Majeure

The obligations of a Partner, other than the payment of money provided hereunder, shall be suspended to the extent and for the period that performance is prevented or delayed by Force Majeure. Force Majeure will be constituted by any cause, whether foreseeable or unforeseeable, beyond the reasonable control of the Partner involved, including, without limitation, labor disputes (however arising and whether or not employee demands are reasonable or within the power of the Partner to grant); acts of God; Laws, or requests of any government or governmental entity; judgments or orders of any court; inability to obtain on reasonably acceptable terms any public or private license, permit or other authorization; curtailment or suspension of activities to remedy or avoid an actual or alleged, present or prospective violation of Environmental Laws; action or inaction by any governmental entity that delays or prevents the issuance or granting of any approval or authorization required to conduct Operations; acts of war or conditions arising out of or attributable to war, whether declared or undeclared; riot, civil strife, insurrection or rebellion; fire, explosion, earthquake, storm, flood, sink holes, drought or other adverse weather condition; delay or failure by suppliers or transporters of materials, parts, supplies, services or equipment or by contractors’ or subcontractors’ shortage of, or inability to obtain, labor, transportation, materials, machinery, equipment, supplies, utilities or services; accidents; breakdown of equipment, machinery or facilities; actions by citizen groups, including but not limited to environmental organizations or native rights groups.

The affected Partner shall promptly give Notice to the other Partner of the suspension of performance, stating therein the nature of the suspension, the reasons therefore, and the expected duration thereof.

Immediately upon the cessation of force majeure the affected Partner shall notify the other Partner in writing and shall take steps to recommence and or continue the performance that was suspended as soon as reasonably possible.

During the period of suspension, the obligations of the Partners to advance funds pursuant to Section 10.6 shall be reduced to levels consistent with Operations.

16.5 Survival of Terms and Conditions

The provisions of this agreement shall survive the transfer of any interests in the Assets under this agreement or the termination of the Partnership to the full extent necessary for their enforcement and the protection of the Partner in whose favor they run.

16.6 Confidentiality and Public Statements

16.6.1 Except as otherwise provided in this Section 16.6, the terms and conditions of this agreement, and all data, reports, records, and other information of any kind whatsoever developed or acquired by any Partner in connection with this agreement shall be treated by the Partners as confidential, (hereinafter called Confidential Information, and no Partner shall reveal or otherwise disclose such Confidential Information to third parties without the prior written consent of the other Partner.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		38

Confidential Information that is available or that becomes available in the public domain, other than through a breach of this provision by a Partner, shall no longer be treated as Confidential Information.

16.6.2 The foregoing restrictions shall not apply to the disclosure of Confidential Information to any Affiliate, to any public or private financing agency or institution, to any contractors or subcontractors which the Partners may engage and to employees and consultants of the Partners or to any third party to which a Partner contemplates the transfer, sale, assignment, Encumbrance or other disposition of all or part of its Participating Interest pursuant to Article 14; provided, however, that in any such case only such Confidential Information as such third party shall have a legitimate business need to know shall be disclosed. The person or company to whom disclosure is made shall first undertake in writing to protect the confidential nature of such information at least to the same extent as the Partners are obligated under this Section 16.6.

16.6.3 In the event that a Partner or an Affiliate thereof is required to disclose Confidential Information to any government, any court, agency or department thereof, or any stock exchange, to the extent required by applicable law, rule or regulation, or in response to a legitimate request for such Confidential Information, the Partner so required shall immediately notify the other Partners hereto of such requirement and the terms thereof, and the proposed form and content of the disclosure prior to such submission.

The other Partner shall have the right to review and comment upon the form and content of the disclosure and to object to such disclosure to the court, agency, exchange or department concerned, and to seek confidential treatment of any Confidential Information to be disclosed on such terms as such Partner shall, in its sole discretion, determine.

16.6.4 The provisions of Section 16.6 shall apply during the term of this agreement and shall continue to apply to (i) the Partners for a period of two (2) years following the effective date of any termination of this agreement, and (ii) any Partner who withdraws, who is deemed to have withdrawn, or which forfeits, surrenders, assigns, transfers or otherwise disposes of its Participating Interest for a period of five (5) years following the occurrence of such event or two (2) years from the effective date of any termination of this agreement, whichever is sooner.

16.6.5 A Partner shall not issue any press release relating to the Project or this agreement except upon giving the other Partner not less than three (3) days advance written Notice of the contents thereof. The Partner proposing such press release shall make any reasonable changes to such proposed press release as such changes may be timely requested by the non-issuing Partner, provided, however, the Partner proposing such press release may include in any press release without Notice any information previously reported by the Partner proposing such press release.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		39

A Partner shall not, without the consent of the other Partner, issue any press release that implies or infers that the non-issuing Partner endorses or joins the issuing Partner in statements or representations contained in any press release.

16.7 Entire Agreement; Successors and Assigns

This agreement contains the entire understanding of the Partners and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, whether written or oral, between the Partners relating to the subject matter hereof, with respect to the Assets subject hereto, and any and all other prior negotiations, representations, offers or understandings between the NV 2 and Surgold relating to the Project, whether written or oral.

This agreement and the obligations and rights created herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and permitted assigns of the Partners.

16.8 Dispute Resolution

16.8.1 Dispute Resolution

If any dispute or conflict arises under this agreement the Partners shall resolve such dispute in the manner hereinafter set forth.

16.8.2 Commencement of Proceedings

Any Partner to the dispute may commence proceedings under this Article 16 by convening a meeting between or among the chief executive (or their highest-ranking representatives) of Surgold’s Parent Company or any successor and the NV 2 or any successor.

These persons shall meet on a mutually agreed upon date within thirty (30) days from the date of the notice convening the meeting and shall use their best efforts to achieve a negotiated settlement to the dispute.

16.8.3 Arbitration

Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this agreement or the breach, termination, validity, performance or interpretation thereof which is not resolved pursuant to Section 16.8.2 hereof or otherwise shall be referred for determination to final, and binding arbitration before the London Court of International Arbitration (the “Court”), to the exclusion of all courts of any State and other like forums, under the Rules of the London Court of Arbitration applicable to International Arbitrations (the “London Rules”) valid on the date of the dispute.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the following provisions:


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		40

16.8.3.1 The NV 2 and Surgold shall each be entitled to appoint a qualified person to act as arbitrator and the Court shall appoint a third arbitrator to complete the tribunal who shall not be a citizen or resident of either Suriname or the United States of America.

16.8.3.2 The arbitration hearings shall be held in London, England.

16.8.3.3 Each Partner shall participate in any arbitration proceedings at its own expense, while expenses of arbitration shall be borne equally by the opposing Partners.

16.8.4 Conciliation or Mediation

The Partners to a dispute may, but need not, refer a dispute to the Court for purposes of attempting a conciliation or mediation thereof, in which event the rules and practices of the Court relating to conciliation or mediation shall apply.

The failure to attempt or complete conciliation or mediation proceedings shall in no event prevent a Partner from instituting arbitration proceedings in accordance with Section 16.8.3 hereof.

16.8.5 Failure to Participate

The failure by a Partner to participate in arbitral proceedings shall not constitute valid grounds for rejecting the jurisdiction of the tribunal or the validity and enforceability of any of its awards.

Each Partner hereby undertakes to execute any arbitral award rendered against it in accordance with its terms, in full, voluntarily and without delay and hereby waives any entitlement to invoke any ground of immunity in respect of jurisdiction or the execution or enforcement of such award, including but not limited to principles of sovereign immunity.

16.8.6 General Principles of International Law

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 16.8.4, to the extent that any arbitration involves a dispute between (a) Surgold and (b) the NV 2, the Partners agree that the arbitrators shall be entitled, at their discretion, to apply such general principles of international law, as may be necessary to give full effect to the true intentions of the Partners as set forth in this agreement, subject, however, that in no event may either Partner assert grounds of privilege or immunity in respect of jurisdiction over a Partner, or execution or enforcement of any award.

16.9 Remedies

Each of the Partners agrees that its failure to comply with the covenants and restrictions set out in Article 16 would constitute an injury and damage to the other Partner impossible to measure monetarily. In the event of any such failure, the other Partner shall, in addition and without prejudice to any other rights and remedies at law or in equity, be entitled to injunctive relief restraining, enjoining or specifically enforcing any acquisition, sale, transfer, charge or Encumbrance save in accordance with or as required by the provisions of Article 16.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		41

Any Partner intending to willfully breach the provisions of Article 16 hereby waives any defense it might have in law or in equity to such injunctive or other equitable relief.

A Partner shall be entitled to seek injunctive relief in any court of competent jurisdiction in the event of a Partner’s failure or threat of a failure to comply with the covenants and restrictions set out in Article 16.

16.10 Further Assurances

Each Partner shall take, from time to time and without additional consideration, such further actions and execute such additional instruments as may be reasonably necessary or convenient to implement and carry out the intent and purpose of this agreement and minimize adverse tax consequences on the Partners.

16.11 Headings

The headings to the Sections of this agreement and the Exhibits are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect the construction hereof.

16.12 Currency

All dollar amounts expressed herein refer to lawful currency of the United States of America, unless otherwise specified.

16.13 Severability

If any provision of this agreement is or shall become illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless be and remain valid and enforceable and the said remaining provisions shall be construed as if this agreement had been executed without the illegal, invalid, or unenforceable portion.

Should any provision of this agreement be construed in such a way as to invalidate the limited partnership characteristic of this partnership, the Partners shall continue to exercise their rights, perform their obligations, and incur liabilities, as contemplated by this agreement to the extent that they can do so in accordance with Laws, until a new CV partnership can be entered into between the Partners.

16.14 Partition

Each of the Partners waives, during the term of this agreement, any right to partition of the Assets or any part thereof and no party shall seek or be entitled to partition of the Project or other Assets whether by way of physical partition, judicial sale or otherwise during the term of this agreement.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		42

16.15 Continuation and Survivorship

Without prejudice to the provisions of Section 16.14, in the event that the Partnership shall cease to exist as Limited Partnership as a result of the withdrawal of one of the Partners or it no longer being in possession of any Partnership Interest, for any reason whatsoever, the remaining Partner shall be entitled to continue the Partnership and the Assets of the company shall remain with the surviving Partner, unless the Partners otherwise agree.

16.16 Governing Law

This agreement shall be construed and governed by the laws of the Republic of Suriname, without reference to the choice of law or conflicts of law principles thereof.

16.17 Language

This agreement has been executed in triplicate, in both the Dutch and English languages, both texts being equally authentic.

In the event of a conflict between the English and Dutch version, the Dutch version shall prevail.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the date first above written.


Surgold:		/s/ Adriaan Van Kersen

(title)		Authorized Representative

(name)		Adriaan Van Kersen

NV 2 :		/s/ R.H. Ramdin

(title)		Director

(name)		R.H. Ramdin


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		43

EXHIBIT A

ACCOUNTING PROCEDURE

Financial Statements for the Partnership shall be prepared according to the following accounting procedures that shall be followed by the Managing Partner under the agreement.

Reference in this Accounting Procedure to Sections, and Subsections are to those located in this Accounting Procedure unless it is expressly stated that they are references to the agreement.

The purpose of this Accounting Procedure is to establish equitable methods for determining charges and credits applicable to Operations under the agreement.

It is the intent of the Partners that none of them shall lose or profit by reason of their duties and responsibilities as the Managing Partner.

The Partners shall meet and in good faith endeavor to agree upon changes deemed necessary to correct any unfairness or inequity.

In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Accounting Procedure and those of the agreement, the provisions of the agreement shall prevail.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1 Financial Statements and Audits

The Managing Partner shall maintain financial statements and detailed and comprehensive accounting records in accordance with this Accounting Procedure, sufficient to provide a record of revenues and expenditures and periodic statements of financial position and the results of Operations for managerial, tax, regulatory or other financial reporting purposes.

Such records shall be retained for the duration of the period allowed the Partners for audit or the period necessary to comply with tax or other regulatory requirements.

The records shall reflect all obligations, advances and credits of the Partners.

1.2 Bank Accounts

The Managing Partner shall maintain one or more separate bank accounts for the payment of all expenses and the deposit of all receipts.

2. CHARGES TO THE PARTNERSHIP

Subject to the limitations hereinafter set forth, the Managing Partner shall charge the Partnership with the following:


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		44

2.1 Royalties, Rentals and Other Payments

The royalties calculated pursuant to Article 20 of the Mineral Agreement, rentals, maintenance costs and other payments necessary to maintain title to the Assets.

2.2 Labor and Employee Benefits

2.2.1 Salaries and wages of the Managing Partner’s employees directly engaged in Operations, including salaries or wages of employees temporarily engaged in Operations, including expenses pursuant to production or incentive bonus plans under a union contract based on actual rates of production, and similar non union bonus plans customary in the industry or necessary to attract competent employees, shall be considered salaries and wages.

2.2.2 The Managing Partner’s cost of holiday, vacation, sickness and disability benefits, and other customary allowances applicable to the salaries and wages chargeable under Subsection 2.2.1 and Section 2.13 may be charged.

2.2.3 The Managing Partner’s actual cost of established plans for employees’ group life insurance, hospitalization, pension, retirement, stock purchase, thrift, bonus and other benefit plans of a like nature applicable to salaries and wages chargeable under Subsection 2.2.1 or Section 2.13, provided that the plans are limited to the extent feasible to those customary in the industry.

2.2.4 Cost of assessments imposed by governmental authority which are applicable to salaries and wages chargeable under Subsection 2.2.1 and Section 2.13, including all penalties except those resulting from the willful misconduct or gross negligence of the Managing Partner.

2.2.5 Those costs in Subsections 2.2.2, 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 may be charged on a “cash or accrual basis” or as a percentage of the amount of salaries and wages.

If a percentage is used, the rate shall be applied to wages or salaries excluding overtime and bonuses.

Such rate shall be based on the Managing Partner’s cost experience and it shall be periodically adjusted to ensure that the total of such charges does not exceed the actual cost.

2.3 Assets

Cost of all Assets purchased or furnished for the Partnership.

2.4 Transportation

Reasonable transportation costs incurred in connection with the transportation of employees, equipment, material and supplies necessary for Operations.

2.5 Services

2.5.1 The cost of contract services and utilities procured from outside sources, other than services described in Sections 2.10 and 2.14.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		45

If contract services are performed by an Affiliate of the Managing Partner, the cost charged to the Partnership shall not be greater than that for which comparable services and utilities are available in the open market.

2.5.2 The costs of using the Managing Partner’s exclusively owned operating assets in support of Operations provided that the charges may not exceed those currently prevailing in the open market.

Such costs shall include costs of maintenance, repairs, other operating expenses, insurance, taxes, depreciation and interest at a rate not to exceed LIBOR plus three percent (3%) per annum.

2.5.3 The costs paid by Surgold to its parent company for management-related services (“Service Fees”).

Service Fees shall be paid for the categories of services described in Attachment III of the Mineral Agreement.

2.6 Materials, Equipment and Supplies

The cost of materials, equipment and supplies, hereafter called, Material, purchased from unaffiliated third parties or furnished by the Managing Partner.

The Managing Partner shall purchase or furnish only so much Material as may be required for use in efficient and economical execution of the Operations.

The Managing Partner shall also maintain inventory levels of Materials at reasonable levels to avoid unnecessary accumulation of surplus stock.

The Managing Partner may charge the Partnership for the required Material on the basis of the Managing Partner’s direct cost and expenses incurred in procuring such Material. Neither the Managing Partner nor any other Partner warrants the Material furnished beyond any dealer’s or manufacturer’s warranty.

2.7 Environmental Compliance Fund

Costs of reasonably anticipated Environmental Compliance which, on a Program basis, shall be determined by the Managing Partner and shall be based on proportionate contributions in an amount sufficient to establish and maintain a fund. This fund, hereinafter called, Environmental Compliance Fund, which through successive proportionate contributions of the Partners during the duration of the agreement, will be sufficient to cover ongoing Environmental Compliance conducted during Operations and which will cover the reasonably anticipated costs of mine closure, post-Operations Environmental Compliance and other Continuing Obligations. A sufficiently substantiated and clear calculation with the principles used for aforementioned costs should be available at all times.

2.8 Insurance Premiums

Premiums paid or accrued for insurance required for the protection of the Partners.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		46

2.9 Damages and Losses

All costs in excess of insurance proceeds necessary to repair or replace damage or losses to any Assets resulting from any cause other than the willful misconduct or gross negligence of the Managing Partner.

2.10 Legal Expense

All legal costs and expenses incurred in or resulting from the Operations or necessary to protect or recover the Assets.

Routine legal expenses are included under Section 2.14.

2.11 Audit

Cost of annual audits under Section 11.2 of this agreement.

2.12 Taxes

All taxes (except income taxes) of every kind and nature assessed or levied upon or in connection with the Assets, the production of Products or Operations, which have been paid by the Managing Partner for the benefit of the Partners.

Each Partner is separately responsible for income taxes which are attributable to its respective Participating Interest.

2.13 District and Camp Expense

A pro rata portion of (i) the salaries and expenses of the Managing Partner’s superintendent and other employees serving Operations whose time is not allocated directly to such Operations, and (ii) the costs of maintaining and operating the Managing Partner’s project office and any sub office (as necessary) and (iii) all costs for establishing and operating necessary camps, including housing facilities for employees, used for Operations.

The expense of those facilities, less any revenue therefrom, shall include depreciation or a fair monthly rental, less the earnings of the facilities.

Such charges shall be apportioned for all Projects served by the employees and facilities on an equitable basis consistent with the Managing Partner’s accounting procedures of GAAP (or IFRS as provided for under Section 6.6 of the Mineral Agreement).

2.14 Management Fee

Each month the Partnership shall pay the Managing Partner or its Affiliate a management fee equal to three and one half percent (3.5%) of allowable costs, hereinafter called, Allowable Costs.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		47

Allowable Costs as used in this Section 2.14 shall include all charges to the Partnership except (i) the Management Fee provided in this Section 2.14; (ii) depreciation, depletion or amortization of tangible or intangible assets; (iii) amounts expended for acquisition, construction or installation of tangible or intangible assets after mining operations have commenced; (iv) government land payments, taxes and assessments, (v) Managing Partner’s (or its Affiliate’s) principal business office expenses, including the following: (a) administrative supervision, which includes services rendered by officers and directors of the Managing Partner or its Affiliate for Operations, except to the extent that such services represent a direct charge to the Partnership, as provided for in Section 2.2; (b) accounting, billing and record keeping in accordance with governmental regulations and the provisions of this agreement; (c) handling of all tax matters, including any protests, except any outside professional fees which the Managing Partner may approve as a direct charge to the Partnership; (d) Routine legal services by the Managing Partner’s or its Affiliate’s legal staff; and (e) records and storage space, telephone service and office supplies.

2.15 Books and Records

Any cost or expenditure incurred in order to comply with IFRS, or an accounting standard other than GAAP for bookkeeping, administrative accountability and external reporting.

2.16 Other Expenditures

Any reasonable direct expenditure, other than expenditures which are covered by the foregoing provisions, incurred by the Managing Partner for the necessary and proper conduct of Operations.

3. DEPRECIATION OF MATERIAL

3.1 Disposition Generally

The Managing Partner shall have no obligation to purchase a Partner’s interest in Material.

The Managing Partner shall determine the disposition of major items of surplus Material, provided the Managing Partner shall have the right to dispose of normal accumulations of junk and scrap Material either by transfer to the Partners as provided in Section 3.2 or by sale.

The Managing Partner shall credit the Partners account in proportion to their Participating Interest for all Material sold hereunder.

3.2 Division in Kind

Division of Material in kind between the Partners shall be in proportion to their respective Participating Interests, and corresponding credits shall be made to the Partnership.

3.3 Sales

Sales of material to third parties shall be credited to the Partnership at the net amount received.

Any damages or claims by the Purchaser shall be charged back to the Partnership if and when paid.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		48

4. INVENTORIES

4.1 Periodic Inventories, Notice and Representations

At reasonable intervals, inventories shall be taken by the Managing Partner, which shall include all such Material as is ordinarily considered controllable by operators of mining projects.

The expense of conducting such periodic inventories shall be charged to the Partnership.

4.2 Reconciliation and Adjustment of Inventories

Reconciliation of inventory with charges to the Partnership shall be made, and a list of overages and shortages shall be determined by the Managing Partner.

Inventory adjustments shall be made by the Managing Partner to the Partnership for overages and shortages, but the Managing Partner shall be held accountable to the Partnership only for shortages due to lack of reasonable diligence.


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		49

EXHIBIT B

MAP OF AREA OF INTEREST


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		50

EXHIBIT CASSETS CONTRIBUTED BY SURGOLD


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		51

EXHIBIT D PARTICIPATING INTEREST

\[To be completed after the Contribution Effective Date pursuant to

Article 6.1.1 and updated from time to time pursuant to Article 6.1.2]


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		52

EXHIBIT E EXISTING ROYALTIES


Venture Agreement RoS NV – Suriname Gold Company LLC		53

OVEREENKOMST TOT WIJZIGING VAN DE

COMMANDITAIRE VENNOOTSCHAPSOVEREENKOMST

Ondergetekenden:

1.	De onderneming SURINAME GOLD COMPANY LLC, rechtspersoon naar het recht van de Staat Delaware, Verenigde Staten van Amerika, ten deze vertegenwoordigd wordende door de speciaal daartoe gemachtigde, de heer Adriaan Van Kersen, hierna te noemen Surgold,

2.	De naamloze vennootschap NV 2, rechtspersoon, ten deze vertegenwoordigd wordende door haar directeur, hierna te noemen NV 2,

Partijen,

In overweging genomen hebbende:

•

dat partijen op heden, 22 november 2013, met elkaar een commanditaire vennootschapsovereenkomst zijn aangegaan, welke hierna als “de Overeenkomst” is aangeduid;

•

dat partijen het nodig achten om in de Overeenkomst wijzingen aan te brengen;

•

dat ingevolge artikel 16.3 van de Overeenkomst dergelijke wijzigingen schriftelijk dienen te geschieden,

Zijn overeengekomen als volgt:

I. In artikel 1 van de Overeenkomst wordt de definitie van het begrip ‘Optie’ gewijzigd, zodat die komt te luiden als hierna aangegeven.

“ “Optie” heeft de betekenis daaraan gegeven in de Delfstoffenovereenkomst, zoals nader toegelicht in de brief van de Minister van Natuurlijke Hulpbronnen van 21 november 2013, waaraan de Minister van Financiën zijn instemming heeft gegeven.”

II. In de Overeenkomst wordt na artikel 5.1.3 een nieuw artikel, genummerd 5.1.4 ingevoegd, met de hierna aangegeven inhoud.

“ 5.1.4 Partijen verklaren uitdrukkelijk dat met de voldoening van de initiële inbreng van Surgold omschreven in 5.1.2 een vorderingsrecht voor Surgold op de Vennootschap ontstaat voor een bedrag gelijk aan het bedrag van de Initiële NV 2 Inbreng. Dit bedrag zal dan ook op aanvraag van Surgold onmiddellijk door de Vennootschap aan Surgold worden voldaan.”

III. Partijen verklaren dat alle vennootschappelijke en andere handelingen vereist om onderhavigewijzigingsovereenkomst aan te gaan en uit te voeren juist en rechtsgeldig zijn genomen.

IV. Deze wijzigingsovereenkomst treedt in werking op de Datum van Inwerkingtreding, bedoeld in de Overeenkomst.

Aldus in tweevoud opgemaakt en getekend te Paramaribo op 22 november 2013.


Surgold:		/s/ Adriaan Van Kersen

(titel) Gemachtigde

(naam) Adriaan Van Kersen

NV2:


(titel) Directeur
(naam)		/s/ R. H. RAMDIN
		R. H. RAMDIN

AGREEMENT TO AMEND THE

COMMANDITAIRE VENNOOTSCHAP AGREEMENT

The undersigned:

1.	SURINAME GOLD COMPANY LLC , a legal entity incorporated pursuant to the laws of the State of Delaware, United States of America, represented for the purposes hereof by Mr. Adriaan Van Kersen, especially authorized thereto, hereinafter Surgold ,

and

2.	The company limited by shares NV 2, a legal entity, represented for the purposes hereof by its Director, hereinafter NV 2 ,

The Parties

Having taken into consideration:

•

that Parties on this day, 22 November 2013, have entered into a commanditaire vennootschap agreement, which hereinafter will be designated as “the Agreement”;

•

that Parties deem it necessary to amend the Agreement;

•

that pursuant to Article 16.3 of the Agreement such amendments have to be made in writing,

Have agreed as follows:

I. In Section 1 of the Agreement the definition of the concept of ‘Option’ is amended in such a manner to read as follows.

“Option” shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Mineral Agreement, as further explained in the letter of the Minister of Natural Resources of 21 November 2013, which the Minister of Finance has given his approval of.”

II. In the Agreement after Section 5.1.3, a new Section numbered 5.1.4 is inserted having the following content.

“ 5.1.4 Parties explicitly state that upon payment of the initial contribution of Surgold as referred to in 5.1.2 Surgold’s right in personam against the Partnership comes into existence for an amount equal to the amount of the Initial NV 2 contribution. This amount will then be immediately paid to Surgold by the Partnership at the request of Surgold.”

III. The Parties represent that all corporate and other action required to be taken in order to permit them to enter into and perform this Amendment Agreement have been properly and validly taken.

IV. This Amendment Agreement shall be deemed to have come into force as of the Effective Date referred to in the Agreement.

This Agreement was drawn up in duplicate and signed in Paramaribo on 22 November 2013.

Surgold : _/s/ Adriaan Van Kersen

(title) Authorized Representative

(name) Adriaan Van Kersen

NV 2:

(title) Director

(name) /s/ R.H. RAMDIN

R.H. RAMDIN

Attachment IV

NET SMELTER RETURNS

1. Net Smelter Returns

1.1 For Precious Metals

Net Smelter Returns, in the case of gold, silver, and platinum group metals, herinafter, Precious Metals, shall be determined by multiplying:

(a)	the gross number of troy ounces of Precious Metals recovered from production of Mines during the preceding calendar month, hereinafter, Monthly Production, delivered to the smelter, refiner, processor, purchaser or other recipient of such production, herinaftercollectively, Payor, by

(b)

for gold, the average of the London Bullion Market, Afternoon Fix, spot prices reported for the preceding calendar month, herinafter Applicable Spot Price, and for all other Precious Metals, the average of the New York Commodities Exchange final spot prices reported for the preceding calendar month for the particular Mineral for which the price is being determined,

and subtracting from the product of Subsections 1.1(a) and 1.1(b) only the following if actually incurred:

(i)

charges imposed by the Payor for refining bullion from doré or concentrates of Precious Metals, hereinafter, Beneficiated Precious Metals, produced by Surgold’s final mill or other final processing plant; however, charges imposed by the Payor for smelting or refining of raw or crushed ore containing Precious Metals or other preliminarily processed Precious Metals shall not be subtracted in determining Net Smelter Returns;

(ii)	penalty substance, assaying, and sampling charges imposed by the Payor for refining Beneficiated Precious Metals contained in such production; and

(iii)

charges and costs, if any, for transportation and insurance of Beneficiated Precious Metals from Surgold’s final mill or other final processing plant to places where such Beneficiated Precious Metals are smelted, refined and/or sold or otherwise disposed of.

1.2

For Other Minerals.

Net Smelter Returns, in the case of all minerals other than Precious Metals and the beneficiated products thereof, hereinafter, Other Minerals, shall be determined by multiplying:

(a)	the gross amount of the particular Other Mineral contained in the Monthly Production delivered to the Payor during the preceding calendar month, by

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

(b)	the average of the New York Commodities Exchange final daily spot prices reported for the preceding calendar month of the appropriate Other Mineral,

and subtracting from the product of Subsections 1.2(a) and 1.2(b) only the following if actually incurred:

(i)	charges imposed by the Payor for smelting, refining or processing Other Minerals contained in such production, but excluding any and all charges and costs related to Surgold’s mills or other processing plants constructed for the purpose of milling or processing Other Minerals, in whole or in part;

(ii)

penalty substance, assaying, and sampling charges imposed by the Payor for smelting, refining, or processing Other Minerals contained in such production, but excluding any and all charges and costs of or related to Surgold’s mills or other processing plants constructed for the purpose of milling or processing Other Minerals, in whole or in part; and

(iii)

charges and costs, if any, for transportation and insurance of Other Minerals and the beneficiated products thereof from Surgold’s final mill or other final processing plant to places where such Other Minerals are smelted, refined and/or sold or otherwise disposed of.

If for any reason the New York Commodities Exchange does not report spot pricing for a particular Other Mineral, then the Parties shall mutually agree upon an appropriate pricing entity or mechanism that accurately reflects the market value of any such Other Mineral.

In the event smelting, refining, or processing of bullion from the Beneficiated Precious Metals or Other Minerals is carried out in custom toll facilities owned or controlled, in whole or in part, by Surgold, which facilities were not constructed solely for the purpose of refining Beneficiated Precious Metals or milling or processing Other Minerals from Mines, then charges, costs and penalties for such smelting, refining or processing shall mean the amount Surgold would have incurred if such smelting, refining or processing were carried out at facilities not owned or controlled by Surgold then offering comparable services for comparable products on prevailing terms, but in no event greater than actual costs incurred by Surgold with respect to such smelting and refining.

In the event Surgold receives insurance proceeds for loss of production of Precious Metals or Other Minerals, Surgold shall pay to the Republic of Suriname six percent (6%) of any such insurance proceeds which are received by Surgold for such loss of production.

2.	Payments of Royalty

As of the Effective Date of this Agreement, the Republic of Suriname elects to receive its Royalty on Precious Metals ‘in kind’ as refined bullion.

Once per year on a calendar year basis during the life of production of Precious Metals from Mines the Republic of Suriname may elect change the payment method.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

Notice of election to receive the following year’s Royalty for Precious Metals ‘in cash’ or ‘in kind’ shall be made written notice delivered to Surgold on or before November 1 of each year.

In the event no written election is made, the Royalty for Precious Metals will continue to be paid to the Republic of Suriname as it is then being paid.

Royalties on Other Minerals may only be paid in cash.

2.1 Royalty In Kind

2.1.1

The Republic of Suriname shall open a bullion storage account at each refinery or mint designated by Surgold as a recipient of production of Precious Metals from Mines.

The Republic of Suriname shall be solely responsible for all costs and liabilities associated with maintenance of such accounts, and Surgold shall not be required to bear any additional expense with respect to such in-kind payments.

2.1.2

On or before the twenty fifth (25 ^th ) day of each calendar month Surgold shall deliver written instructions to the refinery or mint, with a copy to the Republic of Suriname, directing the refinery or mint to deposit six percent (6%) of the refined bullion that resulted from the Monthly Production to the Republic of Suriname’s account or accounts.

2.1.3

Royalty payable ‘in kind’ on silver or platinum group metals shall be converted to the gold equivalent of such silver or platinum group metals by using the average monthly spot prices for Precious Metals described in Article 1.1(b) hereof.

2.1.4

Title to refined bullion delivered to the Republic of Suriname under this Agreement shall pass to the Republic of Suriname at the time such bullion is credited to the Republic of Suriname’s account of accounts at the refinery or mint.

2.1.5

The Republic of Suriname agrees to hold harmless Surgold from any liability imposed as a result of the election of the Republic of Suriname to receive Royalty ‘in kind’ and from any losses incurred as a result of the Republic of Suriname’s trading and hedging activities.

The Republic of Suriname assumes all responsibility for any shortages which occur as a result of the Republic of Suriname’s anticipation of credits to its account in advance of an actual deposit or credit to its account by a refiner or mint.

2.1.6

Surgold shall deliver to the Republic of Suriname a receipt of a statement showing charges incurred by Surgold for deductible costs depicted in Articles 1.1(i), 1.1(ii), and 1.1(iii) hereof.

Within thirty (30) days the Republic of Suriname shall remit to Surgold full payment for such charges.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

If the Republic of Suriname does not pay such charges when due, Surgold shall have the right, at its election, provided the Republic of Suriname does not dispute such charges, to deduct the gold equivalent of such charges from the ounces of gold bullion to be credited to the Republic of Suriname in the following month.

2.2 Royalty In Cash

If the Republic of Suriname elects to receive its Royalty for Precious Metals in cash, and as to Royalty payable on Other Minerals, payments shall be payable on or before the later of ten (10) days after Surgold receives payment from the Payor or the twenty-fifth (25th) day of the month following the calendar month in which the Minerals subject to the Royalty were shipped to the Payor by Surgold.

For purposes of calculating the cash amount due to the Republic of Suriname, Precious Metals and Other Minerals will be deemed to have been sold or otherwise disposed of at the time refined production from Mines is delivered, made available, or credited to Surgold by a refiner or mint.

The cash amount due for Royalty on Precious Metals or Other Minerals shall be six percent (6%) of the Net Smelter Returns as provided in articles 1.1 and 1.2 of this Attachment IV as applicable.

Surgold shall make each Royalty payment by delivery of a check payable to the Republic of Suriname and delivering such check to the Republic of Suriname at the address listed in the Agreement, or by direct bank deposit to the Republic of Suriname’s account as the Republic of Suriname shall designate.

3. Detailed Statement

All Royalty payments or credits shall be accompanied by a detailed statement explaining the calculation thereof together with any available settlement sheets from the Payor.

The Parties recognize that a period of time exists between the production of ore, the production of doré or concentrates from ore, the production of refined or finished product from doré or concentrates, and the receipt of Payor’s statements for refined or finished product.

As a result, the payment of Royalty will not coincide exactly with the actual amount of refined or finished product produced from Mines for the previous month.

Surgold will provide final reconciliation promptly after settlement is reached with the Payor for all lots sold or subject to other disposition in any particular month.

In the event that the Republic of Suriname has been underpaid for any provisional payment (whether in cash or ‘in kind’), Surgold shall pay the difference in cash by check and not ‘in kind’ with such payment being made at the time of the final reconciliation.

If the Republic of Suriname has been overpaid in the previous calendar month, the Republic of Suriname shall make a payment to Surgold of the difference by check.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

Reconciliation payments shall be made on the same basis as used for the payment in cash pursuant to Article 2.2 hereof.

4 Hedging Transactions

All profits and losses resulting from Surgold’s sales of Precious Metals or Other Minerals, or Surgold’s engaging in any commodity futures trading, option trading, or metals trading, or any combination thereof, and any other hedging transactions including trading transactions designed to avoid losses and obtain possible gains due to metal price fluctuations, hereinafter herinafter collectively, Hedging Transactions, are specifically excluded from Royalty calculations pursuant to this Agreement.

All Hedging Transactions by Surgold and all profits or losses associated therewith, if any, shall be solely for Surgold’s account.

5 Commingling

Surgold shall have the right to commingle Precious Metals and Other Minerals from Mines with minerals from other mines.

Before any Precious Metals or Other Minerals produced from Mines are commingled with minerals from other mines, the Precious Metals or Other Minerals produced from Mines shall be measured and sampled in accordance with sound mining and metallurgical practices for moisture, metal, commercial minerals and other appropriate content, applied on a consistent basis.

Representative samples of the Precious Metals or Other Minerals shall be retained by Surgold and assays (including moisture and penalty substances) and other appropriate analyses of these samples shall be made before commingling to determine gross metal content of Precious Metals or gross metal or mineral content of Other Minerals.

Surgold shall retain such analyses for a reasonable amount of time, but not less than twenty four (24) months, after receipt by the Republic of Suriname of the Royalty paid with respect to such commingled Minerals, and shall retain such samples for not less than thirty (30) days after collection.

6. Stockpilings and Tailings

Surgold shall retains its right to process, reprocess and sell Minerals extracted from tailings, residues, waste rock, spoiled leach materials, and other materials (hereinafter collectively, Materials) resulting from Surgold’s Operations, but such Mineral shall remain subject to the Royalty should the Materials be processed or reprocessed, as the case may be, in the future and result in the production and sale or other disposition of Minerals.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Surgold shall have the right to commingle (as provided herein).

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

In the event Materials from Mines are processed or reprocessed, as the case may be, and regardless of where such processing or reprocessing occurs, the Royalty payable thereon shall be determined on a pro rata basis as determined by using the best engineering and technical practices then available.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

Attachment X

ANNUAL PROFIT

Annual Profit shall mean the annual income of Surgold subject to the levying of corporate income tax as determined in Section 11.2 of the Agreement.

However, for the purpose of deduction in relation to the levying of income tax the following rules shall apply for expenditures specifically indicated below:

(a) Depreciation

The depreciation of the expenditure made up to the moment of Commencement of Commercial Production and the expenditures related to the capital equipment during the execution of the Project shall be depreciated in a period of four (4) years (25% per year) in a straight line, without taking into account any residual value.

The gross earnings obtained from the sale of the disposed of capital equipment should, however, have to be added to the Profit of the year this capital equipment is being sold.

(b) Exploration Expenses

Exploration Expenses incurred in a given year after the Commencement of Commercial Production within the Area of Interest shall be deducted up to an annual maximum of ten million U.S. Dollar in the year they are incurred. Excess amounts shall be capitalized without interest and deducted over the immediately following three (3) year period.

(c) Reclamation Costs

Reclamation Costs shall be deducted as accrued.

All documentation prepared in accordance with Section 19.4.2 of the Agreement shall be part of Surgold’s books and records and shall be made available to the Inspection of Direct Taxes upon request, pursuant to the Income Tax 1922.

(d) Deduction of Interest

Interest paid to related parties may be deducted in full to the extent that Surgold’s debt-to-equity ratio in a year is equal to or less than 4:1.

The term “debt” refers to any amount borrowed by Surgold from direct or indirect shareholders.

For these purposes, trade and business related costs incurred by Surgold are not to be considered as debt until they are outstanding for more than one calendar year.

The term “equity” refers to the capital stock, paid-in capital and retained earnings (as determined under GAAP principles) of Surgold.

The debt to equity ratio for a year shall be determined based upon a simple average of the total debt borrowed from direct or indirect shareholders and equity in existence at the beginning and end of that year.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

To the extent that Surgold’s debt-to-equity ratio in a year exceeds 4:1, the interest deduction for that year is disallowed on the portion of debt that exceeds the debt to equity ratio (with interest on more recently incurred debt disallowed before interest that is incurred on earlier incurred debt).

Surgold shall maintain written loan agreements for all shareholders loans, which will provide, among other things, the terms of the shareholder loan, a repayment schedule or date or repayment, and an explanation of how the arm’s length interest rate was determined.

The loan agreements shall be part of Surgold’s books and records and shall be made available to the Tax Administration upon request, pursuant to the Income Tax 1922.

(e) Royalty

The Royalty, as described in Chapter 20 of the Agreement, shall be deductible.

(f) Service Fees

Service Fees shall be deductible.

Annual written documentation related to the Service Fees shall be maintained by Surgold as part of its books and records in Suriname and shall be made available to the Inspector of Direct Taxes upon request, pursuant to the Income Tax 1922.

(g) Statistic Fee and Consent Fee

Statistic Fee and Consent Fee, as provided by Section 8.1.1 shall be deductible.

(h) Contributions for Community Development

All contributions for Community Development shall be deductible.

(i) Reinvestment Reserve

Surgold is entitled to form a reinvestment reserve, as referred to in Article 69 of the Mining Act.

(j) Mining Act

The provisions of the Mining Act shall be applicable to this Agreement, except insofar as otherwise provided in this Agreement.

Mineral Agreement between

The Republic of Suriname and Suriname Gold Company LLC

Appendix belonging to letter no. 1816/13

ACT of September 10, 2013

containing permission to enter into a

Mineral Agreement with Suriname Gold

Company LLC concerning the area

known as Merian, District of Sipaliwini.

(Act Merian Gold Project).

BILL

THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SURINAME

Having taken in consideration that – with a view to the development of the mineral potential of Suriname – it is necessary to give the Government of the Republic of Suriname permission to enter into an agreement with Suriname Gold Company LLC;

Having heard the Council of State, after approval by the National Assembly, has passed the following act:

Article 1

1. The Government of Suriname is given permission to enter into an agreement with Suriname Gold Company LLC, a legal person according to the law of the State of Delaware (United States of America), for the commercial exploitation of gold and associated metals in the area known as ‘Merian’ in the District of Sipaliwini, which agreement, including its appendices, is contained in the appendix belonging with the law.

2. The Minister of Natural Resources and the Minister of Finance are authorized to sign the agreement referred to in Paragraph 1 for and on behalf of the Republic of Suriname.

3. Any intended participation of the State of Suriname in any mining right will be effected through a company in which the State of has full control, which company will participate in accordance with the appendices of the agreement referred to in Article 1 Paragraph 1.

Article 2

1. Insofar as the provisions of the agreement referred to in Article 1 Paragraph 1 derogate from existing legal regulations or are in violation thereof, the provisions of this agreement shall prevail. The provisions referred to in this Paragraph have been exhaustively included in the agreement referred to.

2. The legal regulations referred to in Paragraph 1 are exclusive of:

a. The Constitution of the Republic of Suriname;

b. The international agreements applicable to the Republic of Suriname with foreign nations or bodies under the law of nations, or statutes or rules of procedure from or issued by such organizations under the law of nations, of which Suriname is a member;

c. The Act containing General Provisions of the Legislation of Suriname;

d. The Penal Code and other laws, insofar as they concern the penal provisions laid down in such laws;

e. The Code of Criminal Proceedings; and

f. Surinamese legal regulations in respect of the peoples living in tribal communities.

Article 3

Future legal regulations concerning the rates of income tax for companies will not change the income tax rate to be used as agreed in the Agreement referred to in Article 1 Paragraph 1 neither to the advantage nor the disadvantage.

Article 4

1. This Act can be cited as the “Act Merian Gold Project”

2. This Acts will be published in the Bulletin of Acts, Orders and Regulations of the Republic of Suriname and shall enter into force on the day following its publication.

3. The Minister of Natural Resources and the Minister of Finance shall be charged with the implementation of this act.

Done in Paramaribo, September 10, 2013

DESIRÉ D. BOUTERSE

ACT of September 10, 2013

containing permission to enter into a

Mineral Agreement with Suriname Gold

Company LLC concerning the area

known as Merian, District of Sipaliwini.

(Act Merian Gold Project).

EXPLANATORY NOTE

GENERAL

This act has a purpose to grant permission to the Government of the Republic of Suriname to enter into a mineral agreement with Suriname Gold Company LLC, with the emphasis on the exploitation of gold. This agreement, however, contains provisions that derogate from existing legal regulations, which is only allowed if the National Assembly has given its explicit consent thereto.

That consent also includes the authorization of the Minister of Natural Resources and the Minister of Finance to bind the Republic of Suriname by signing the agreement.

Entering into the agreement with Suriname Gold Company LLC should lead to the development of a large-scale gold industry in East Suriname and as such should be very favourable for the Surinamese economy. This agreement should, however, not be only be counted to the efforts of the Government to give strong impulses to the Surinamese economy, but should also be placed within the framework of its pursuit to bring development to the population in all corners of Suriname.

The Government has decided to use the option to participate in the exploitation, as referred to in Article 32 of the Mining Act.

The negotiations with Suriname Gold Company LLC within this context has led to the Republic of Suriname being able to participate up to at most 25% in the Merian Gold Project (see: Article 3.1 of the Mineral Agreement). The right to participate that is established by and through the exercise of this option is, however, passed on to a company limited by shares to be established (NV 2), in which the Republic of Suriname has full control over the management (Article 3.2 of the Mineral Agreement).

The Republic of Suriname will also receive royalty in addition to income from taxes, which royalty will be 6% over the Net Smelter Returns (Articles 11.2, 11.3 and 20.1 of the Mineral Agreement), and more in particular in kind as refined gold, unless payment in cash would be preferred. The royalty percentage agreed upon, for that matter, belongs internationally to the higher segment of royalty compensation for gold mining.

It is also taken into account that the investments of Suriname Gold Company LLC, in addition will have a spin-off effect on the activities of local companies and persons, so that increased tax earnings can also be expected for the Republic of Suriname.

Appendix I of the Mineral Agreement contains the partnership agreement between the company to be established by the State (NV 2) and Suriname Gold Company LLC. The structure of a limited partnership was selected, in which Suriname Gold Company LLC will act as managing partner and NV 2 will act as silent partner.

NV 2, however, to obtain partnership rights, will have to make an initial contribution to the partnership (Article 5.2 of the Partnership Agreement), and will furthermore on tha basis of approved programmes and budgets through so-called cash call have to contribute proportionately to the cash needs of the partnership (Article 10.6 of the partnership agreement).

The contribution of Suriname Gold Company LLC to the partnership will consist amongst other things of the use of the rights from the Merian Right of Exploitation, but automatically also all rights of exploitation and exploration of gold and associated matals that it will obtain in the future in the joint area around the Merian area, the Area of Interest (Articles 5.1.2 and 15.1 of the partnership agreement).

The Republic of Suriname will as shareholder of NV 2 be able to profit also in an indirect manner from the benefits of future exploration and exploitation rights of Suriname Gold Company LLC in the area.

EXPLANATION BY ARTICLE

Article 2

Of the legal regulations that derogate from the Mineral Agreement have been excluded: the Constitution, the international agreements applicable to the Republic of Suriname with foreign nations or bodies under the law of nations, as well as statutes or rules of procedure from or issued by such organizations under the law of nations, of which Suriname is a member, the Act containing General Provisions of the Legislation of Suriname, the Penal Code and other laws, insofar as they concern the penal provisions laid down in such laws, the Code of Criminal Proceedings; and Surinamese legal regulations in respect of the peoples living in tribal communities.

Article 3

In Article 11.2.6 of the agreement referred to in Article 1 Paragraph 1 is agreed that Suriname Gold Company LLC for the duration of this agreement will have to pay thirty-six per cent (36%) over the annual profits in income tax. This rate is fixed for the duration of the agreement. This legal provision thus excludes that future legal regulations of any nature whatsoever will change this.

Done in Paramaribo, the September 10, 2013

DESIRÉ D. BOUTERSE

LETTERHEAD OF THE MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES

No.: NH13/947

To:

The Managing Director of Suriname Gold Company LLC,

Mr. A. Van Kersen

Surinamestraat no. 54

Paramaribo, 21 November 2013

Subject: Your letter of 31 October 2013

Dear Mr. Van Kersen,

With this letter we confirm the receipt of your letter of 31 October 2013.

Before discussing the request contained in the letter, it does not appear to be superfluous to emphasize to you that amendments in the Mineral Agreement adopted by the National Assembly on the 7th of June 2013, will only be possible after having obtained permission for that purpose from the National Assembly. As Minister we are not authorized to do so. The Minister of Natural Resources is indeed charged, together with the Minister of Finance, pursuant to Article 4 Paragraph 3 of the Merian Gold Project Act (Bulletin of Acts, Orders and Regulations S.B. 2013 no. 162) with the implementation of this act. This letter has to be seen within that context.

For as far as your question is concerned on obtaining clarity about Articles 3.1 and 3.2 amended by the National Assembly of the draft of the Mineral Agreement, we can state as follows. These amendments were made to emphasize that, after the exercise by the Republic of Suriname of its participation option which originates in Article 32 of the Mining Act, the actual participation in the Merian Gold Project by the Republic of Suriname will take place through a Company Limited by Shares to be designated. The right itself to participate in the Merian Gold Project arises after all through the exercise of the participation option by the Republic of Suriname.

This right to participation should thus immediately after it comes into being be considered to be transferred by the Republic of Suriname to the Company Limited by Shares to be designated (NV 2).

The participation option of the Republic of Suriname to participate for at most 25% in the Merian Gold Project is for that matter referred to in the draft of the Mineral Agreement as ‘the Option’.

Trusting to have taken away the lack of clarity about the purport of Articles 3.1 and 3.2 of the approved draft of the Mineral Agreement, we remain,

Yours faithfully,

The Minister of Natural Resources

[signature illegible]

Ir. J.K. Hok

For approval

The Acting Minister of Finance,

[signature illegible]

Mr. S. Relyveld

No. 185

BULLETIN OF ACTS, ORDER AND REGULATIONS

OF THE

REPUBLIC OF SURINAME

ORDER of the Minister of Natural Resources of 20 November 2013 no. 690/13-0373, containing the establishment of the policies to be followed by means of the transfer and maintenance of rights of exploration and exploitation of gold and other minerals by Suriname Gold Company LLC.

THE MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Having read: the application of Suriname Gold Company LLC of 31 October 2013.

IN VIEW OF:

1. Article 4 Paragraph 3 of the Merian Gold Project Act (Bulletin of Acts, Orders and Regulations S.B. 2013 no. 162);

2. Articles 5 Paragraph 1 and 15 Paragraph 1 under a of the Order on Task Descriptions Departments 1991 (Bulletin of Acts, Orders and Regulations S.B. 1991 no. 58, as amended last by S.B. 2010 no. 124).

CONSIDERING:

•

that transparent and consistent policies are desirable in the transfer and maintenance of rights of exploration and exploitation of gold and other minerals located within the socalled “Area of Interest”, as referred to in the Agreement annexed to the Merian Gold Project Act (hereinafter: the Mineral Agreement);

•

that the policies in respect hereof should for that reason be laid down.

HAS DECIDED:

I. To lay down as the policy to be followed for the rights of exploration and exploitation for gold and other minerals to be acquired by Suriname Gold Company LLC by means of transfer from companies affiliated to it or from third parties:

a. that the Suriname Gold Company LLC is completely free, taking the applicable legal regulations into account, to acquire rights of exploration and exploitation for gold and other minerals within the aforementioned Area of Interest from companies affiliated to it or from third parties;

b. that, however, to bring the (renewed) rights of exploration to be acquired under the governance of the Mineral Agreement, it is required to limit the rights to be acquired and more in particular to only include ‘gold and all metals that occur in nature normally together with gold’;

c. that for that purpose it is necessary that Suriname Gold Company LLC also indicates this in its request to the Minister of Natural Resources for the transfer of such rights, after which for the thus acquired renewed rights of exploration and the successive rights of exploitation the provisions of the Mineral Agreement will apply;

d. that in the foregoing, the procedure and time periods stipulated in Article 4.6 under c and d of the Mineral Agreement shall be equally applicable.

II. To lay down as the policy to be followed in respect of the already existing rights of exploration for gold and other minerals belonging to third parties in aforementioned Area of Interest:

a. that the provisions of the Mining Act will be conscientiously observed, in particular the provisions relating to the extension, reduction and termination of these rights as well as to the granting of the successive rights of exploitation for gold and other minerals;

b. that this entails that within the Area of Interest only Rights of Exploration and Rights of Exploitation for gold and other minerals that are in “good standing” belonging to third parties shall be maintained.

III. To lay down that the Ministers of Natural Resources and Home Affairs shall be in charge of the implementation of this Order.

IV. To determine that this Order will be published in the Bulletin of Acts, Orders and Regulations of the Republic of Suriname and will come into force on the day of signing of the Mineral Agreement.

V. To send a copy of this Order to the Chairman of the Suriname Audit Chamber, the Director of the Cabinet of the President of the Republic of Suriname, the Vice-President of the Republic of Suriname, the Permanent Secretary of Finance, the Permanent Secretary General Affairs of the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Permanent Secretary of Justice and Police, the Director of the Bureau of National Security, the Permanent Secretary of Labour, Technological Development and Environment, the Director of NIMOS, the Director of the Bauxite Institute Suriname, the Permanent Secretary of Natural Resources, the Chief of the Suriname Police Corps, the Mortgage Keeper, and other interested parties.

Paramaribo, the 20th of November 2013,

J.K. HOK.

Issued in Paramaribo, the 21st of November 2013

The Minister of Home Affairs,

S. MOESTADJA.

Exhibit 12.1

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Amounts in millions, except ratio)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Earnings:
Income before income and mining tax and other items ⁽¹⁾	$	235
Adjustments:
Fixed charges added to earnings		196
Amortization of capitalized interest		10

	$	441

Fixed Charges:
Net interest expense ⁽²⁾	$	187
Portion of rental expense representative of interest		9

Fixed charges added to earnings		196
Capitalized interest		9

	$	205

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges		2.2

⁽¹⁾	Excludes interest on income tax liabilities. Interest and penalties related to income taxes are included in Income and mining tax expense .

⁽²⁾	Includes interest expense of majority-owned subsidiaries and amortization of debt issuance costs.

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

(Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Gary J. Goldberg, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Newmont Mining Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ GARY J. GOLDBERG

Gary J. Goldberg

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

July 29, 2014

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

(Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Laurie Brlas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Newmont Mining Corporation;

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ LAURIE BRLAS

Laurie Brlas

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

July 29, 2014

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 of Newmont Mining Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Gary J. Goldberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ GARY J. GOLDBERG

Gary J. Goldberg
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

July 29, 2014

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 of Newmont Mining Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Laurie Brlas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ LAURIE BRLAS

Laurie Brlas

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

July 29, 2014

Exhibit 95

Mine Safety Disclosure

The following disclosures are provided pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”) and Item 104 of Regulation S-K, which requires certain disclosures by companies required to file periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that operate mines regulated under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”). The disclosures reflect our U.S. mining operations only as the requirements of the Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K do not apply to our mines operated outside the United States.

Mine Safety Information. Whenever the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) believes a violation of the Mine Act, any health or safety standard or any regulation has occurred, it may issue a citation which describes the alleged violation and fixes a time within which the U.S. mining operator (e.g. our subsidiary, Newmont USA Limited) must abate the alleged violation. In some situations, such as when MSHA believes that conditions pose a hazard to miners, MSHA may issue an order removing miners from the area of the mine affected by the condition until the alleged hazards are corrected. When MSHA issues a citation or order, it generally proposes a civil penalty, or fine, as a result of the alleged violation, that the operator is ordered to pay. Citations and orders can be contested and appealed, and as part of that process, are often reduced in severity and amount, and are sometimes dismissed. The number of citations, orders and proposed assessments vary depending on the size and type (underground or surface) of the mine as well as by the MSHA inspector(s) assigned.

The below table reflects citations and orders issued to us by MSHA during the quarter ended June 30, 2014. The proposed assessments for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 were taken from the MSHA data retrieval system as of July 7, 2014.

Additional information about the Act and MSHA references used in the table follows.

•

Section 104(a) S&S Citations : Citations received from MSHA under section 104(a) of the Mine Act for violations of mandatory health or safety standards that could significantly and substantially contribute to the cause and effect of a mine safety or health hazard.

•

Section 104(b) Orders : Orders issued by MSHA under section 104(b) of the Mine Act, which represents a failure to abate a citation under section 104(a) within the period of time prescribed by MSHA. This results in an order of immediate withdrawal from the area of the mine affected by the condition until MSHA determines that the violation has been abated.

•

Section 104(d) S&S Citations and Orders : Citations and orders issued by MSHA under section 104(d) of the Mine Act for unwarrantable failure to comply with mandatory, significant and substantial health or safety standards.

•

Section 110(b)(2) Violations : Flagrant violations issued by MSHA under section 110(b)(2) of the Mine Act.

•

Section 107(a) Orders : Orders issued by MSHA under section 107(a) of the Mine Act for situations in which MSHA determined an “imminent danger” (as defined by MSHA) existed.


Mine ⁽¹⁾	Section 104(a) S&S Citations ⁽²⁾		Section 104(b) Orders		Section 104(d) S&S Citations and Orders ⁽²⁾		Section 110(b)(2) Violations		Section 107(a) Orders		($ in millions) Proposed MSHA Assessments ⁽³⁾		Fatalities
Chukar		—		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Emigrant		—		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Exodus		—		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Genesis		1		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Leeville		1		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Lone Tree		—		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Midas		—		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Mill 6		—		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Pete Bajo		—		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Phoenix		—		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
South Area		6		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Twin Creeks		2		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Vista		—		—		—		—		—	$	—		—

TOTAL		10		—		—		—		—	$	—		—

(1)

The definition of a mine under section 3 of the Mine Act includes the mine, as well as other items used in, or to be used in, or resulting from, the work of extracting minerals, such as land, structures, facilities, equipment, machines, tools, and minerals preparation facilities. Unless otherwise indicated, any of these other items associated with a single mine have been aggregated in the totals for that mine. MSHA assigns an identification number to each mine and may or may not assign separate identification numbers to related facilities such as preparation facilities. We are providing the information in the table by mine rather than MSHA identification number because that is how we manage and operate our mining business and we believe this presentation will be more useful to investors than providing information based on MSHA identification numbers.

(2)	10 Section 104(a) S&S Citations and—Section 104(d) S&S Citations and Orders were subject to contest as of June 30, 2014.

(3)

Represents the total dollar value of the proposed assessment from MSHA under the Mine Act pursuant to the citations and or orders preceding such dollar value in the corresponding row. No proposed assessments of the orders or citations listed above had yet been posted to the MSHA data retrieval system or made available to the Company by MSHA as of July 7, 2014.

Pattern or Potential Pattern of Violations . During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, none of the mines operated by us received written notice from MSHA of (a) a pattern of violations of mandatory health or safety standards that are of such nature as could have significantly and substantially contributed to the cause and effect of mine health or safety hazards under section 104(e) of the Mine Act or (b) the potential to have such a pattern.

Pending Legal Actions . The following table reflects pending legal actions before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (the “Commission”), an independent adjudicative agency that provides administrative trial and appellate review of legal disputes arising under the Mine Act, as of June 30, 2014, together with the number of legal actions instituted and the number of legal actions resolved as of June 30, 2014.


Mine ⁽¹⁾	Pending Legal Actions as of June 30, 2014 ⁽²⁾		Legal Actions Instituted as of June 30, 2014		Legal Actions Resolved as of June 30, 2014
Chukar		—		—		—
Emigrant		—		—		—
Exodus		1		1		1
Genesis		1		1		—
Leeville		4		1		2
Lone Tree		—		—		—
Midas		—		—		—
Mill 6		—		—		—
Pete Bajo		—		—		—
Phoenix		—		—		3
South Area		4		1		1
Twin Creeks		—		—		—
Vista		—		—		—

TOTAL		10		4		7

(1)

The definition of a mine under section 3 of the Mine Act includes the mine, as well as other items used in, or to be used in, or resulting from, the work of extracting minerals, such as land, structures, facilities, equipment, machines, tools and minerals preparation facilities. Unless otherwise indicated, any of these other items associated with a single mine have been aggregated in the totals for that mine. MSHA assigns an identification number to each mine and may or may not assign separate identification numbers to related facilities such as preparation facilities. We are providing the information in the table by mine rather than MSHA identification number because that is how we manage and operate our mining business and we believe this presentation will be more useful to investors than providing information based on MSHA identification numbers.

(2)

The foregoing list includes legal actions which were initiated prior to the current reporting period and which do not necessarily relate to citations, orders or proposed assessments issued by MSHA during the quarter ended June 30, 2014. The number of legal actions noted above are reported on a per docket basis.

Legal actions pending before the Commission may involve, among other questions, challenges by operators to citations, orders and penalties they have received from MSHA or complaints of discrimination by miners under section 105 of the Mine Act. The following is a brief description of the types of legal actions that may be brought before the Commission.

•

Contests of Citations and Orders: A contest proceeding may be filed with the Commission by operators, miners or miners’ representatives to challenge the issuance of a citation or order issued by MSHA.

•

Contests of Proposed Penalties (Petitions for Assessment of Penalties) : A contest of a proposed penalty is an administrative proceeding before the Commission challenging a civil penalty that MSHA has proposed for the alleged violation contained in a citation or order. The validity of the citation may also be challenged in this proceeding as well.

•

Complaints for Compensation: A complaint for compensation may be filed with the Commission by miners entitled to compensation when a mine is closed by certain withdrawal orders issued by MSHA. The purpose of the proceeding is to determine the amount of compensation, if any, due miners idled by the orders.

•

Complaints of Discharge, Discrimination or Interference : A discrimination proceeding is a case that involves a miner’s allegation that he or she has suffered a wrong by the operator because he or she engaged in some type of activity protected under the Mine Act, such as making a safety complaint.

•

Applications for Temporary Relief : An application for temporary relief from any modification or termination of any order or from any order issued under section 104 of the Mine Act.

•

Appeals of Judges’ Decisions or Orders to the Commission : A filing with the Commission of a petition for discretionary review of a Judge’s decision or order by a person who has been adversely affected or aggrieved by such decision or order.

The following table reflects the types of legal actions pending before the Commission as of June 30, 2014.


Mine ⁽¹⁾	Contests of Citations and Orders		Contests of Proposed Penalties		Complaints for Compensation		Complaints of Discharge, Discrimination or Interference		Applications for Temporary Relief		Appeals of Judges’ Decisions or Orders to the Commission
Chukar		—		—		—		—		—		—
Emigrant		—		—		—		—		—		—
Exodus		—		2		—		—		—		—
Genesis		—		2		—		—		—		—
Leeville		—		3		—		—		—		—
Lone Tree		—		—		—		—		—		—
Midas		—		—		—		—		—		1
Mill 6		—		—		—		—		—		—
Pete Bajo		—		—		—		—		—		—
Phoenix		—		—		—		—		—		—
South Area		—		4		—		—		—		—
Twin Creeks		—		—		—		—		—		—
Vista		—		—		—		—		—		—

TOTAL		—		11		—		—		—		1

(1)

The definition of a mine under section 3 of the Mine Act includes the mine, as well as other items used in, or to be used in, or resulting from, the work of extracting minerals, such as land, structures, facilities, equipment, machines, tools and minerals preparation facilities. Unless otherwise indicated, any of these other items associated with a single mine have been aggregated in the totals for that mine. MSHA assigns an identification number to each mine and may or may not assign separate identification numbers to related facilities such as preparation facilities. We are providing the information in the table by mine rather than MSHA identification number because that is how we manage and operate our mining business and we believe this presentation will be more useful to investors than providing information based on MSHA identification numbers.