UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-4300
APACHE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 41-0747868 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
One Post Oak Central, 2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77056-4400
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrants telephone number, including area code (713) 296-6000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
Common Stock, $0.625 par value | New York Stock Exchange, Chicago Stock Exchange and NASDAQ National Market | |
Apache Finance Canada Corporation | New York Stock Exchange | |
7.75% Notes Due 2029 Irrevocably and Unconditionally Guaranteed by Apache Corporation |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.625 par value
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes ¨ No x
Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of registrant as of June 30, 2014 |
$ | 38,470,137,875 | ||
Number of shares of registrants common stock outstanding as of January 31, 2015 |
376,823,368 |
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Portions of registrants proxy statement relating to registrants 2015 annual meeting of stockholders have been incorporated by reference in Part II and Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K.
DESCRIPTION
i
DEFINITIONS
All defined terms under Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X shall have their statutorily prescribed meanings when used in this report. As used in this document:
3-D means three-dimensional.
4-D means four-dimensional.
b/d means barrels of oil or natural gas liquids per day.
bbl or bbls means barrel or barrels of oil or natural gas liquids.
bcf means billion cubic feet of natural gas.
boe means barrel of oil equivalent, determined by using the ratio of one barrel of oil or NGLs to six Mcf of gas.
boe/d means boe per day.
Btu means a British thermal unit, a measure of heating value.
LIBOR means London Interbank Offered Rate.
LNG means liquefied natural gas.
Mb/d means Mbbls per day.
Mbbls means thousand barrels of oil or natural gas liquids.
Mboe means thousand boe.
Mboe/d means Mboe per day.
Mcf means thousand cubic feet of natural gas.
Mcf/d means Mcf per day.
MMbbls means million barrels of oil or natural gas liquids.
MMboe means million boe.
MMBtu means million Btu.
MMBtu/d means MMBtu per day.
MMcf means million cubic feet of natural gas.
MMcf/d means MMcf per day.
NGL or NGLs means natural gas liquids, which are expressed in barrels.
NYMEX means New York Mercantile Exchange.
oil includes crude oil and condensate.
PUD means proved undeveloped.
SEC means United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Tcf means trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
U.K. means United Kingdom.
U.S. means United States.
With respect to information relating to our working interest in wells or acreage, net oil and gas wells or acreage is determined by multiplying gross wells or acreage by our working interest therein. Unless otherwise specified, all references to wells and acres are gross.
ii
PART I
ITEMS 1 AND 2. BUSINESS | AND PROPERTIES |
This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated herein by reference contain forward-looking statements based on expectations, estimates, and projections as of the date of this filing. These statements by their nature are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions and are influenced by various factors. As a consequence, actual results may differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. See the risk factors set forth in Item 1A of this Form 10-K and Part II, Item 7AQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskForward-Looking Statements and Risk of this Form 10-K.
General
Apache Corporation, a Delaware corporation formed in 1954, is an independent energy company that explores for, develops, and produces natural gas, crude oil, and natural gas liquids. We currently have exploration and production interests in five countries: the U.S., Canada, Egypt, Australia, and the U.K. North Sea (North Sea). Apache also pursues exploration interests in other countries that may over time result in reportable discoveries and development opportunities. We treat all operations as one line of business.
Our common stock, par value $0.625 per share, has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) since 1969, on the Chicago Stock Exchange (CHX) since 1960, and on the NASDAQ National Market (NASDAQ) since 2004. On June 10 and 11, 2014, we filed certifications of our compliance with the listing standards of the NYSE and the NASDAQ, including our principal executive officers certification of compliance with the NYSE standards. Through our website, www.apachecorp.com , you can access, free of charge, electronic copies of the charters of the committees of our Board of Directors, other documents related to our corporate governance (including our Code of Business Conduct and Governance Principles), and documents we file with the SEC, including our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, as well as any amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Included in our annual and quarterly reports are the certifications of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer that are required by applicable laws and regulations. Access to these electronic filings is available as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. You may also request printed copies of our committee charters or other governance documents free of charge by writing to our corporate secretary at the address on the cover of this report. Our reports filed with the SEC are made available to read and copy at the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20549. You may obtain information about the Public Reference Room by contacting the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Reports filed with the SEC are also made available on its website at www.sec.gov . From time to time, we also post announcements, updates, and investor information on our website in addition to copies of all recent press releases. Information on our website or any other website is not incorporated by reference into, and does not constitute a part of, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Properties to which we refer in this document may be held by subsidiaries of Apache Corporation. References to Apache or the Company include Apache Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries unless otherwise specifically stated.
Business Strategy
Apaches mission is to grow a profitable exploration and production company in a safe and environmentally responsible manner for the long-term benefit of our shareholders. Apaches long-term perspective has many dimensions, which are centered on the following core strategic components:
| rigorous portfolio management |
| conservative capital structure |
1
| rate of return focus |
| continuous improvement in operating and capital efficiency |
Throughout the cycles of our industry, this strategy has underpinned our ability to deliver long-term production and reserve growth and achieve competitive returns on invested capital for the benefit of our shareholders. We have increased reserves 23 out of the last 29 years and production 32 out of the past 36 years, a testament to our consistency over the long-term.
We continuously review and optimize our portfolio of assets in response to changing industry and economic conditions. Over the last several years, Apache has taken action to monetize certain nonstrategic international assets, and enhance and streamline our North American onshore portfolio through a series of divestitures of noncore assets. These include:
| LNG Projects On December 15, 2014, Apache subsidiaries announced the sale of the Kitimat LNG and Wheatstone LNG projects, along with accompanying upstream oil and gas reserves to Woodside Petroleum Limited for cash consideration of $2.75 billion plus recovery of Apaches net expenditures in the Wheatstone and Kitimat projects between June 30, 2014 and closing. |
| Nonstrategic Assets in the Anadarko Basin and in Southern Louisiana On December 31, 2014, Apache completed the sale of certain Anadarko basin and southern Louisiana oil and gas assets for approximately $1.3 billion in two separate transactions. In the Anadarko basin, Apache sold approximately 115,000 net acres in Wheeler County, Texas, and western Oklahoma. In southern Louisiana, the Company sold working interests in approximately 90,000 net acres. |
| Certain Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Assets On June 30, 2014, Apache completed the sale of non-operated interests in the Lucius and Heidelberg development projects and 11 primary term deepwater exploration blocks in the Gulf of Mexico for $1.4 billion. The effective date of the transaction was May 1, 2014. |
| Nonstrategic Canadian Assets On April 30, 2014, Apache completed the sale of primarily dry gas producing hydrocarbon assets in the Deep Basin area of western Alberta and British Columbia, Canada, for $374 million. The assets comprise 328,400 net acres in the Ojay, Noel, and Wapiti areas. Apache retained 100 percent of its working interest in horizons below the Cretaceous in the Wapiti area, including rights to the liquids-rich Montney and other deeper horizons. The effective date of the transaction was January 1, 2014. |
| Argentina Operations On March 12, 2014, Apaches subsidiaries completed the sale of all of the Companys operations in Argentina to YPF Sociedad Anónima for $800 million (subject to customary closing adjustments) plus the assumption of $52 million of bank debt as of June 30, 2013. |
| Egypt Sinopec Partnership On November 14, 2013, Apache announced the completion of the sale of a one-third minority participation in its Egypt oil and gas business to a subsidiary of Sinopec International Petroleum Exploration and Production Corporation (Sinopec). Apache received cash consideration of $2.95 billion. This noncontrolling interest is recorded separately in the Companys financial statements. |
| Gulf of Mexico Shelf Operations On September 30, 2013, Apache completed the sale of its Gulf of Mexico Shelf operations and properties to Fieldwood Energy LLC (Fieldwood), an affiliate of Riverstone Holdings. Under the terms of the agreement, Apache received cash consideration of $3.7 billion, and Fieldwood assumed $1.5 billion of discounted asset abandonment liabilities. Additionally, Apache retained 50 percent of its ownership interest in both exploration blocks and in horizons below production in developed blocks, and access to existing infrastructure. |
We intend to focus our growth initiatives on our North American onshore portfolio. Our Egypt and the North Sea regions provide a strong complement to our North American production and cash flow by generating
2
steady and attractive rates of return and excess cash flow. This is particularly true in the context of the recent oil price downturn, as the cash flows from both Egypt and the North Sea are less sensitive to falling oil prices than our North American assets. We currently have no intention to exit Egypt or the North Sea. Our non-LNG Australian assets offer a dynamic exploration opportunity; however, we continue to evaluate this area for potential monetization.
While we cannot predict the length or depth of the current oil price correction, or the timing and extent of a potential price rebound, we have moved quickly and decisively regarding what we can control: the timing and levels of capital spending and our cost structure. Specifically, during the third quarter of 2014 we were operating 91 rigs onshore in North America, and by the end of February 2015, our rig count was reduced to 27 rigs. We also reduced the number of completion crews and will delay completing some of our wells in backlog until the associated service costs align with the current commodity price environment. In addition to well cost initiatives, we have taken steps to reduce both lease operating and general and administrative expenses and will continue to take proactive measures to reduce them further. We intend to manage the current downturn as we have other downturns throughout our 60-year history. Apache has proven its ability to capitalize on historical cycles of low commodity prices by focusing on a strong balance sheet, cost discipline, operating efficiency, adding to its extensive inventory of drilling locations, and ensuring we are prepared to take advantage of potential opportunities that arise as a result of low commodity prices, such as the availability of key acreage at attractive prices.
For a more in-depth discussion of our growth strategy, 2014 results, and the Companys capital resources and liquidity, please see Part II, Item 7Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-K.
Geographic Area Overviews
During 2014, we had exploration and production interests in six countries: the U.S., Canada, Egypt, Australia, the U.K. North Sea, and Argentina. Apache also pursues exploration interests in other countries that may over time result in reportable discoveries and development opportunities. In March 2014, the Company completed the sale of all of its operations in Argentina. Results of operations and cash flows for Argentina operations are reflected as discontinued operations in the Companys financial statements and are not included in the following table.
The following table sets out a brief comparative summary of certain key 2014 data for each of our operating areas. Additional data and discussion is provided in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
Production |
Percentage
of Total Production |
Production
Revenue |
Year-End
Estimated Proved Reserves |
Percentage
of Total Estimated Proved Reserves |
Gross
Wells Drilled |
Gross
Productive Wells Drilled |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(In MMboe) | (In millions) | (In MMboe) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
106.2 | 45 | % | $ | 5,744 | 1,234 | 52 | % | 1,118 | 1,095 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
28.3 | 12 | 1,092 | 414 | 17 | 106 | 102 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total North America |
134.5 | 57 | 6,836 | 1,648 | 69 | 1,224 | 1,197 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Egypt (1) |
54.9 | 23 | 3,539 | 280 | 12 | 220 | 180 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Australia |
20.5 | 9 | 1,058 | 323 | 13 | 12 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
North Sea |
26.1 | 11 | 2,316 | 145 | 6 | 22 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total International |
101.5 | 43 | 6,913 | 748 | 31 | 254 | 210 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
236.0 | 100 | % | $ | 13,749 | 2,396 | 100 | % | 1,478 | 1,407 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes production volumes, revenues, and reserves attributable to a noncontrolling interest in Egypt. |
3
North America
Apaches North American onshore and offshore asset base primarily comprises operations in the Permian Basin, the Anadarko basin in western Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle, Gulf Coast areas of the U.S., and in Western Canada. We also have leasehold acreage holdings in the Cook Inlet of Alaska and other areas where we are pursuing exploration opportunities. Over the past several years, the Company acquired significant acreage positions in many attractive basins and plays across North America. This portfolio expansion phase shifted during 2013 and 2014 when we completed strategic divestitures to rebalance our portfolio to an asset mix that we believe will drive more predictable growth and deliver increased value to our shareholders. As part of this effort, Apaches drilling activity has focused on our North America onshore assets, which delivered liquids growth of 19 percent during 2014 excluding the impacts of divestitures. Our North American asset base has a significant inventory of drilling opportunities and base production that provides a foundation for the Company to be flexible in its approach to capital allocation. This flexibility is critical to managing cash flows given volatile commodity prices for crude oil and natural gas.
With the recent decline in oil prices and reduction in our expected cash flow, we have initially set our 2015 capital budget for North America at $2.1 billion to $2.3 billion. This reflects an approximately 65 percent decline from the prior year. This budget covers planned expenditures for drilling, completions, recompletion projects, equipment upgrades, expansion of existing facilities and equipment, plugging and abandonment, seismic studies, and leasing additional acreage.
North America Onshore
Overview We have access to significant liquid hydrocarbons across our 12 million gross acres onshore in the U.S. and Canada, approximately 60 percent of which is undeveloped. Approximately 55 percent of Apaches worldwide equivalent 2014 production and 68 percent of our estimated year-end proved reserves were in our U.S. and Canada onshore regions. To manage our development efforts across broad acreage positions within North America, our onshore assets are divided into four regions: Permian, Gulf Coast, Central, and Canada.
Permian Region Our Permian region controls over 3.2 million gross acres with exposure to numerous plays across the Permian Basin. Apache is one of the largest operators in the Permian Basin, with more than 14,500 producing wells in 155 fields, including 47 waterfloods and seven CO 2 floods. Total region production for 2014 was up 25 percent sequentially as a result of an active drilling program where we ran an average of 40 rigs during the year. Production in the region has increased for 16 consecutive quarters. During the year, we drilled or participated in drilling 728 wells, of which 244 were horizontal. The Permian regions year-end 2014 estimated proved reserves were 970 MMboe, representing 7 percent growth over year-end 2013.
Over the past several years, the region has been testing numerous formations and building a large inventory of horizontal opportunities in several plays across our acreage position. In 2014, production growth was driven by Wolfcamp wells in the Barnhart area and in the Southern Midland Basin, the Bone Springs development program in the Delaware basin, and Yeso drilling on the Northwest shelf.
We continue to balance large development programs with exploration activity in several new areas. Given its acreage holdings, recent seismic data acquisitions and continued exploration efforts, the region has built a deep portfolio of drilling inventory and opportunities to sustain our activity for many years.
Gulf Coast Region Apaches Gulf Coast region is known for its proven onshore and near-shore basins of Texas and Louisiana where it has a significant acreage position of approximately 1.2 million gross acres, including approximately 285,000 mineral fee acres. Total region production in 2014 was 30 Mboe/d, of which 50 percent was oil and natural gas liquids.
During the year, the region continued to delineate its East Texas Eagle Ford play, primarily in Brazos and Burleson counties, with consistently strong results. As our drilling program has continued to advance, we
4
acquired over $600 million of additional Eagle Ford acreage in surrounding areas in 2014. The region drilled or participated in drilling 77 wells in 2014.
In December 2014, Apache sold its working interest in approximately 90,000 net acres in southern Louisiana and Mississippi for $560 million. The effective date of the transaction is October 1, 2014. Apaches Gulf Coast regional production for 2015 will be almost entirely attributable to the East Texas Eagle Ford play.
Central Region The Central region controls 2.2 million gross acres and includes 3,150 producing wells primarily in western Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle. The majority of our drilling activity during 2014 was focused in legacy Anadarko basin formations such as the Granite Wash, Marmaton, Cottage Grove, and Cleveland. Total region production in 2014 was 91 Mboe/d, of which 52 percent was oil and natural gas liquids. As of year-end, the Central regions estimated proved reserves totaled 217 MMboe.
Throughout the year, Apache continued to build on its drilling inventory and development opportunities in the Whittenburg basin, located just west of our Anadarko basin properties. Apaches Canyon Wash sand and the prolific Canyon Lime play will be the focus of our regions drilling activity in 2015.
In December 2014, Apache completed the sale of non-core assets in the Anadarko basin, including approximately 115,000 net acres in Wheeler County, Texas, and western Oklahoma, for approximately $730 million. The effective date of the transaction is October 1, 2014.
Canada Region Apache entered the Canadian market in 1995 and currently holds nearly 4.4 million gross acres across the provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, and Saskatchewan. Most of Canadas acreage is held-by-production. The regions large acreage position provides portfolio diversification as well as significant drilling opportunities. Our Canadian region provided approximately 12 percent of Apaches 2014 worldwide production and held 414 MMboe of estimated proved reserves at year-end.
In 2014, Apache drilled or participated in drilling 106 wells in the region with successful results in the established Swan Hills, Viking, Bluesky, and Glauconite developments. In addition, Canada further established key plays in the Duvernay and Montney formations with a focus on reducing drilling and completion costs. In the Duvernay, we began drilling our first seven-well pad and expect to see test rates in the third quarter of 2015. Our Montney drilling has been focused in the Wapiti area.
In our continuing assessment of the Companys North American portfolio, we divested approximately 328,400 net acres in the Ojay, Noel, and Wapiti areas in April 2014. Apache retained 100 percent of its working interest in horizons below the Cretaceous in the Wapiti area, including rights to the liquids-rich Montney and other deeper horizons. We also signed an agreement to divest our working interest in the Kitimat LNG development and approximately 333,000 of our net acres in the Horn River and Liard natural gas basins of British Columbia. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2015.
North America Offshore
Gulf of Mexico Region The Gulf of Mexico region comprises assets in approximately 617 blocks in the offshore waters of the Gulf of Mexico. In 2014, Apache combined its deepwater and shelf technical teams to focus on subsalt and other deeper exploration opportunities in water depths less than 1,000 feet, which have been relatively untested by the industry. In addition to the exploration and development of properties in shallower water, Apache continues to pursue joint venture and other monetization opportunities for its deepwater prospects, which offer exposure to significant reserve and production potential in underexplored and oil-prone areas in water depths greater than 1,000 feet. During 2014, Apaches Gulf of Mexico region contributed 10.5 Mboe/d to the Companys total production.
5
On June 30, 2014, Apache completed the sale of non-operated interests in the Lucius and Heidelberg development projects and 11 primary term deepwater exploration blocks to a subsidiary of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. and other interest owners for $1.4 billion.
North America Marketing
In general, most of our North American gas is sold at either monthly or daily market prices. Also, from time to time, the Company will enter into fixed physical sales contracts for durations of up to one-year. These physical sales volumes are typically sold at fixed prices over the term of the contract. Our natural gas is sold primarily to local distribution companies (LDCs), utilities, end-users, marketers, and integrated major oil companies. We strive to maintain a diverse client portfolio, which is intended to reduce the concentration of credit risk. We transport some of our Canadian natural gas under firm transportation contracts to delivery points into the U.S. in order to diversify our market exposure.
Apache primarily markets its North American crude oil to integrated major oil companies, marketing and transportation companies, and refiners based on a West Texas Intermediate (WTI) price, adjusted for quality, transportation and a market-reflective differential.
In the U.S., our objective is to maximize the value of crude oil sold by identifying the best markets and most economical transportation routes available to move the product. Sales contracts are generally 30-day evergreen contracts that renew automatically until canceled by either party. These contracts provide for sales that are priced daily at prevailing market prices. Also, from time to time, the Company will enter into physical term sales contracts for durations up to five years. These term contracts typically have a firm transport commitment and often provide for the higher of prevailing market prices from multiple market hubs.
In Canada, the crude is transported by pipeline or truck within Western Canada to market hubs in Alberta and Manitoba where it is sold, allowing for a more diversified group of purchasers and a higher netback price. A portion of our trucked barrels are delivered and sold at rail terminals. We evaluate our transport options monthly to maximize our netback prices.
Apaches NGL production is sold under contracts with prices based on local supply and demand conditions, less the costs for transportation and fractionation, or on a weighted-average sales price received by the purchaser.
International
Apaches international assets are located in Egypt, Australia, and offshore the U.K. in the North Sea. In 2014, international assets contributed 43 percent of our production and 50 percent of our oil and gas revenues. Approximately 31 percent of our estimated proved reserves at year-end were located outside North America.
Egypt
Overview Our activity in Egypt began in 1994 with our first Qarun discovery well, and today we are one of the largest acreage holders in Egypts Western Desert. At year-end 2014, we held 6.7 million gross acres, of which approximately 71 percent is undeveloped, providing us with considerable exploration and development opportunities for the future. The region had gross oil production of 197 Mb/d and gross natural gas production of 895 MMcf/d in 2014, or 88 Mb/d and 370 MMcf/d net to Apaches consolidated holdings.
Sinopec holds a one-third minority interest in Apaches Egypt oil and gas business. At December 31, 2014, our Egypt region had estimated proved reserves of 280 MMboe, of which 93 MMboe is attributable to Sinopecs noncontrolling interest. Our estimated proved reserves in Egypt are reported under the economic interest method and exclude the host countrys share of reserves.
6
Our operations in Egypt are conducted pursuant to production-sharing agreements in 24 separate concessions, under which the contractor partners pay all operating and capital expenditure costs for exploration and development. Development leases within concessions currently have expiration dates ranging from 2 to 25 years, with extensions possible for additional commercial discoveries or on a negotiated basis. A percentage of the production on development leases, usually up to 40 percent, is available to the contractor partners to recover operating and capital expenditure costs, with the balance generally allocated between the contractor partners and the Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation (EGPC) on a contractually defined basis.
Our growth in Egypt has been driven by an ongoing drilling program, and we have historically been one of the most active drillers in the Western Desert. We drilled 171 development and 49 exploration wells in 2014. Approximately 45 percent of our exploration wells were successful, further expanding our presence in the westernmost concessions and unlocking additional opportunities in existing plays. A key component of the regions success has been the ability to acquire and evaluate 3-D seismic surveys that enable our technical teams to consistently high-grade existing prospects and identify new targets across multiple pay horizons in the Cretaceous, Jurassic, and deeper Paleozoic formations.
Following four years of political turmoil, in January 2014, Egyptians voted on and overwhelmingly approved a new constitution, and in June 2014, Mr. Abdel Fattah el-Sisi was sworn in as president of Egypt.
Apaches operations, located in remote locations in the Western Desert, have not experienced production interruptions, and we have continued to receive development lease approvals for our drilling program. However, a further deterioration in the political, economic, and social conditions or other relevant policies of the Egyptian government, such as changes in laws or regulations, export restrictions, expropriation of our assets or resource nationalization, and/or forced renegotiation or modification of our existing contracts with EGPC, or threats or acts of terrorism by groups such as ISIS, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Marketing Our gas production is sold to EGPC primarily under an industry-pricing formula, a sliding scale based on Dated Brent crude oil with a minimum of $1.50 per MMBtu and a maximum of $2.65 per MMBtu, plus an upward adjustment for liquids content. The region averaged $2.96 per Mcf in 2014.
Oil from the Khalda Concession, the Qarun Concession, and other nearby Western Desert blocks is sold to third parties in the export market or to EGPC when called upon to supply domestic demand. Oil sales are exported from or sold at one of two terminals on the northern coast of Egypt. Oil production that is sold to EGPC is sold on a spot basis priced at Brent with a monthly EGPC official differential applied.
Australia
Overview Apaches holdings in Australia are focused offshore Western Australia in the Carnarvon, Exmouth, and Browse basins, with production operations in the Carnarvon and Exmouth basins. We have operated in the Carnarvon basin since acquiring the gas processing facilities on Varanus Island and adjacent producing properties in 1993. At the end of 2014 we controlled approximately 21 million gross acres offshore Western Australia through 34 exploration permits, 18 production licenses, and 10 retention leases. Over the past decade, the regions exploration activity has established a significant pipeline of projects that are expected to contribute to production growth as they are brought online in the coming years. As of year-end 2014, approximately 96 percent of our acreage is undeveloped. During 2014, the region had net production of 21 Mb/d and 214 MMcf/d, contributing 9 percent of worldwide consolidated production and 13 percent of year-end consolidated proved reserves.
The region participated in drilling 12 offshore wells in 2014, of which 6 were exploration wells. Four of the exploration wells were successful. This compares to 12 wells drilled in the prior year. Development work during the year also continued for the Coniston oil field project, which lies just north of the Van Gogh field. The field
7
will be produced via subsea completions tied back to the Ningaloo Vision Floating Production Storage and Offloading Vessel (FPSO) at Van Gogh. Modifications and upgrades to the FPSO are underway, and the final phase of work is planned for the first half of 2015, with first oil production expected shortly thereafter. Apache has a 52.5 percent working interest in the field.
As noted previously, on December 15, 2014, Apache announced an agreement with Woodside Petroleum to sell its 13 percent interest in the Chevron-operated Wheatstone LNG project. The sale also includes Apaches 65 percent interest in the WA-49-L block, which includes the Julimar and Brunello offshore gas fields and the Balnaves oil development. The transaction will have an effective date of June 30, 2014, and under terms of the agreement, Woodside will reimburse Apache for its net expenditure for Wheatstone subsequent to that date. Following the transactions expected close in the first quarter of 2015, Apache will continue to hold upstream acreage offshore Western Australia in the Carnarvon, Exmouth, and Canning basins along with related hydrocarbon reserves and production.
Marketing Western Australia has historically had a local market for natural gas with a limited number of buyers and sellers resulting in sales under mostly long-term, fixed-price contracts, many of which contain periodic price revision clauses based on either the Australian consumer price index or a commodity linkage. As of December 31, 2014, Apache had 20 active gas contracts in Australia with expiration dates ranging from June 2015 to December 2026. Recent increases in demand and higher development costs have increased the prices required from the local market in order to support the development of new supplies. As a result, market prices negotiated on recent contracts have continued to be higher than historical levels.
We directly market all of our Australian crude oil production into Australian domestic and international markets at prices generally indexed to Dated Brent benchmark crude oil prices plus premiums, which typically result in price realizations above crude sold at WTI-based prices.
North Sea
Overview Apache entered the North Sea in 2003 after acquiring an approximate 97 percent working interest in the Forties field (Forties). Since acquiring Forties, Apache has actively invested in the region and has established a large inventory of drilling prospects through successful exploration programs and the interpretation of acquired 3-D and 4-D seismic data. Building upon its success in Forties, in 2011 Apache acquired Mobil North Sea Limited, providing the region with additional exploration and development opportunities across numerous fields, including operated interests in the Beryl, Nevis, Nevis South, Skene, and Buckland fields and non-operated interests in the Maclure field. In total, Apache has interest in approximately 1 million gross acres in the U.K. North Sea.
In 2014, the North Sea region contributed 11 percent of worldwide consolidated production and 6 percent of year-end estimated proved reserves. In 2014, 22 development wells were drilled in the North Sea, of which 20 were productive. In the Forties area in the Tonto, Maule, and Bacchus fields, Apache has benefited from extensive 4-D seismic interpretations over the last few years and has targeted areas of bypassed oil in the mature reservoir. The Forties Alpha Satellite Platform (FASP) was also commissioned during the third quarter of 2014, providing an additional 18 drilling slots as well as power generation, fluid separation, and gas lift compression.
Marketing We have traditionally sold our North Sea crude oil under both term contracts and spot cargoes. The term sales are composed of a market-based index price plus a premium, which reflects the higher market value for term arrangements. The prices received for spot cargoes are market driven and can trade at a premium or discount to the market-based index.
Natural gas from the Beryl field is processed through the SAGE gas plant operated by Apache. The gas is sold to a third party at the St. Fergus entry point of the national grid on a National Balancing Point index price basis. The condensate mix from the SAGE plant is processed further downstream. The split streams of propane
8
and butane are sold on a monthly entitlement basis, and condensate is sold on a spot basis at the Braefoot Bay terminal using index pricing less transportation.
Argentina
On March 12, 2014, Apaches subsidiaries completed the sale of all of the Companys operations in Argentina to YPF Sociedad Anónima for $800 million (subject to customary closing adjustments) plus the assumption of $52 million of bank debt as of June 30, 2013. The results of operations related to Argentina have been classified as discontinued operations in all periods presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Other Exploration
New Ventures
Apaches global New Ventures team provides exposure to new growth opportunities by looking outside of the Companys traditional core areas and targeting higher-risk, higher-reward exploration opportunities located in frontier basins as well as new plays in more mature basins. Plans for 2015 include drilling a deepwater well offshore Suriname.
Major Customers
In 2014, 2013, and 2012 purchases by Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries accounted for 19 percent, 24 percent, and 20 percent, respectively, of the Companys worldwide oil and gas production revenues.
Drilling Statistics
Worldwide in 2014 we participated in drilling 1,478 gross wells, with 1,407 (95 percent) completed as producers. Historically, our drilling activities in the U.S. have generally concentrated on exploitation and extension of existing producing fields rather than exploration. As a general matter, our operations outside of the U.S. focus on a mix of exploration and development wells. In addition to our completed wells, at year-end a number of wells had not yet reached completion: 318 gross (214.7 net) in the U.S.; 27 gross (19.0 net) in Canada; 35 gross (32.5 net) in Egypt; and 3 gross (2.2 net) in the North Sea.
9
The following table shows the results of the oil and gas wells drilled and completed for each of the last three fiscal years:
Net Exploratory | Net Development | Total Net Wells | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Productive | Dry | Total | Productive | Dry | Total | Productive | Dry | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
18.5 | 6.4 | 24.9 | 781.5 | 10.1 | 791.6 | 800.0 | 16.5 | 816.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 83.9 | 2.0 | 85.9 | 84.9 | 3.0 | 87.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Egypt |
18.6 | 22.8 | 41.4 | 143.3 | 9.9 | 153.2 | 161.9 | 32.7 | 194.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Australia |
1.6 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 2.9 | | 2.9 | 4.5 | 1.7 | 6.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North Sea |
| | | 17.6 | 1.1 | 18.7 | 17.6 | 1.1 | 18.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Argentina |
| | | 1.0 | | 1.0 | 1.0 | | 1.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total |
39.7 | 31.9 | 71.6 | 1,030.2 | 23.1 | 1,053.3 | 1,069.9 | 55.0 | 1,124.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
15.6 | 11.2 | 26.8 | 834.9 | 12.6 | 847.5 | 850.5 | 23.8 | 874.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
| | | 108.5 | 6.9 | 115.4 | 108.5 | 6.9 | 115.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Egypt |
30.5 | 18.7 | 49.2 | 141.9 | 7.3 | 149.2 | 172.4 | 26.0 | 198.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Australia |
2.2 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 3.4 | | 3.4 | 5.6 | 0.4 | 6.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North Sea |
| 0.5 | 0.5 | 13.4 | 0.1 | 13.5 | 13.4 | 0.6 | 14.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Argentina |
2.4 | | 2.4 | 22.0 | | 22.0 | 24.4 | | 24.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total |
50.7 | 30.8 | 81.5 | 1,124.1 | 26.9 | 1,151.0 | 1,174.8 | 57.7 | 1,232.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
9.5 | 3.5 | 13.0 | 746.0 | 9.6 | 755.6 | 755.5 | 13.1 | 768.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
5.0 | 7.5 | 12.5 | 110.3 | 14.0 | 124.3 | 115.3 | 21.5 | 136.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Egypt |
28.0 | 22.5 | 50.5 | 144.4 | 1.0 | 145.4 | 172.4 | 23.5 | 195.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Australia |
1.9 | 2.7 | 4.6 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 6.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North Sea |
1.3 | | 1.3 | 11.7 | 3.9 | 15.6 | 13.0 | 3.9 | 16.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Argentina |
2.0 | | 2.0 | 23.0 | | 23.0 | 25.0 | | 25.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other International |
| 0.5 | 0.5 | | | | | 0.5 | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total |
47.7 | 36.7 | 84.4 | 1,036.7 | 29.2 | 1,065.9 | 1,084.4 | 65.9 | 1,150.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive Oil and Gas Wells
The number of productive oil and gas wells, operated and non-operated, in which we had an interest as of December 31, 2014, is set forth below:
Oil | Gas | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||
United States |
14,480 | 9,610 | 3,595 | 1,807 | 18,075 | 11,417 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
2,050 | 1,004 | 2,520 | 2,010 | 4,570 | 3,014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Egypt |
1,160 | 1,100 | 100 | 96 | 1,260 | 1,196 | ||||||||||||||||||
Australia |
45 | 20 | 15 | 8 | 60 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
North Sea |
175 | 116 | 25 | 14 | 200 | 130 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
17,910 | 11,850 | 6,255 | 3,935 | 24,165 | 15,785 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross natural gas and crude oil wells include 640 wells with multiple completions.
10
Production, Pricing, and Lease Operating Cost Data
The following table describes, for each of the last three fiscal years, oil, NGL, and gas production volumes, average lease operating expenses per boe (including transportation costs but excluding severance and other taxes), and average sales prices for each of the countries where we have operations:
Production |
Average Lease
Operating Cost per Boe |
Average Sales Price | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, |
Oil
(MMbbls) |
NGLs
(MMbbls) |
Gas
(Bcf) |
Oil
(Per bbl) |
NGLs
(Per bbl) |
Gas
(Per Mcf) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
48.7 | 21.5 | 215.8 | $ | 9.55 | $ | 87.33 | $ | 25.57 | $ | 4.33 | |||||||||||||||||
Canada |
6.4 | 2.3 | 117.8 | 17.90 | 83.57 | 33.61 | 4.07 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Egypt (1) |
32.1 | 0.2 | 135.1 | 9.83 | 97.44 | 51.80 | 2.96 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Australia |
7.5 | | 78.1 | 11.73 | 94.99 | | 4.43 | |||||||||||||||||||||
North Sea |
22.2 | 0.5 | 20.5 | 17.30 | 95.53 | 59.42 | 8.29 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
116.9 | 24.5 | 567.3 | 11.67 | 91.94 | 27.28 | 4.11 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
53.6 | 19.9 | 285.2 | $ | 11.60 | $ | 98.14 | $ | 27.29 | $ | 3.84 | |||||||||||||||||
Canada |
6.5 | 2.4 | 181.6 | 15.68 | 87.00 | 30.50 | 3.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Egypt (1) |
32.7 | | 130.1 | 9.42 | 107.94 | | 2.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Australia |
7.0 | | 81.5 | 10.35 | 110.42 | | 4.43 | |||||||||||||||||||||
North Sea |
23.3 | 0.5 | 18.6 | 15.16 | 107.48 | 73.06 | 10.43 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
123.1 | 22.8 | 697.0 | 12.02 | 102.62 | 28.56 | 3.77 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
49.1 | 12.3 | 312.6 | $ | 12.83 | $ | 94.98 | $ | 32.19 | $ | 3.74 | |||||||||||||||||
Canada |
5.8 | 2.3 | 219.9 | 13.87 | 84.89 | 34.63 | 3.42 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Egypt |
36.5 | | 129.5 | 7.73 | 110.92 | | 3.90 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Australia |
10.6 | | 78.3 | 9.08 | 115.22 | | 4.55 | |||||||||||||||||||||
North Sea |
23.3 | 0.6 | 21.0 | 12.38 | 107.97 | 77.11 | 8.95 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
125.3 | 15.2 | 742.4 | 11.52 | 103.29 | 34.31 | 3.90 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes production volumes attributable to a one-third noncontrolling interest in Egypt |
Gross and Net Undeveloped and Developed Acreage
The following table sets out our gross and net acreage position as of December 31, 2014, in each country where we have operations:
Undeveloped Acreage | Developed Acreage | |||||||||||||||
Gross Acres | Net Acres | Gross Acres | Net Acres | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
United States |
8,164 | 4,080 | 2,321 | 1,188 | ||||||||||||
Canada |
1,735 | 1,179 | 2,648 | 1,918 | ||||||||||||
Egypt |
4,824 | 3,537 | 1,925 | 1,761 | ||||||||||||
Australia |
20,085 | 11,794 | 900 | 545 | ||||||||||||
North Sea |
837 | 375 | 183 | 122 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
35,645 | 20,965 | 7,977 | 5,534 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2014, Apache had 3.1 million net undeveloped acres scheduled to expire by year-end 2015 if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms. Additionally, Apache has
11
1.7 million and 1.9 million net undeveloped acres set to expire in 2016 and 2017, respectively. We strive to extend the terms of many of these licenses and concession areas through operational or administrative actions, but cannot assure that such extensions can be achieved on an economic basis or otherwise on terms agreeable to both the Company and third parties including governments.
Exploration concessions in our Egypt region comprise a significant portion of our net undeveloped acreage expiring over the next three years. We have 1.0 million net undeveloped acres set to expire in 2015 and 2016. Apache will continue to pursue acreage extensions in areas in which it believes exploration opportunities exist and over the past year has been successful in being awarded six-month extensions on targeted concessions. Longer term extensions are also being finalized with EGPC. In Australia, 1.4 million, 0.4 million and 1.1 million net undeveloped acres are scheduled to expire in 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. There were no reserves recorded on this undeveloped acreage.
Separately, with the announced divestiture of our Kitimat and Wheatstone LNG projects, an additional 79,000 net undeveloped acres and 100,000 net developed acres in Australia and 330,000 net undeveloped acres in Canada will be sold as a part of the transaction.
As of December 31, 2014, 23 percent of U.S. net undeveloped acreage and 63 percent of Canadian undeveloped acreage was held by production.
Estimated Proved Reserves and Future Net Cash Flows
Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of natural gas, crude oil, condensate, and NGLs that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing conditions, operating conditions, and government regulations. Estimated proved developed oil and gas reserves can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. The Company reports all estimated proved reserves held under production-sharing arrangements utilizing the economic interest method, which excludes the host countrys share of reserves.
Estimated reserves that can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques are included in the proved classification when successful testing by a pilot project or the operation of an active, improved recovery program using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty for the engineering analysis on which the project or program is based. Economically producible means a resource that generates revenue that exceeds, or is reasonably expected to exceed, the costs of the operation. Reasonable certainty means a high degree of confidence that the quantities will be recovered. Reliable technology is a grouping of one or more technologies (including computational methods) that has been field-tested and has been demonstrated to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability in the formation being evaluated or in an analogous formation. In estimating its proved reserves, Apache uses several different traditional methods that can be classified in three general categories: (1) performance-based methods; (2) volumetric-based methods; and (3) analogy with similar properties. Apache will, at times, utilize additional technical analysis, such as computer reservoir models, petrophysical techniques, and proprietary 3-D seismic interpretation methods, to provide additional support for more complex reservoirs. Information from this additional analysis is combined with traditional methods outlined above to enhance the certainty of our reserve estimates.
Proved undeveloped reserves include those reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. Undeveloped reserves may be classified as proved reserves on undrilled acreage directly offsetting development areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, or where reliable technology provides reasonable certainty of economic producibility. Undrilled locations may be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless specific circumstances justify a longer time period.
12
The following table shows proved oil, NGL, and gas reserves as of December 31, 2014, based on average commodity prices in effect on the first day of each month in 2014, held flat for the life of the production, except where future oil and gas sales are covered by physical contract terms. This table shows reserves on a boe basis in which natural gas is converted to an equivalent barrel of oil based on a 6:1 energy equivalent ratio. This ratio is not reflective of the current price ratio between the two products.
Oil
(MMbbls) |
NGL
(MMbbls) |
Gas
(Bcf) |
Total
(MMboe) |
|||||||||||||
Proved Developed: |
||||||||||||||||
United States |
444 | 184 | 1,616 | 897 | ||||||||||||
Canada |
76 | 18 | 990 | 259 | ||||||||||||
Egypt (1) |
129 | 1 | 637 | 236 | ||||||||||||
Australia |
30 | | 640 | 137 | ||||||||||||
North Sea |
105 | 2 | 87 | 122 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Proved Developed |
784 | 205 | 3,970 | 1,651 | ||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped: |
||||||||||||||||
United States |
170 | 70 | 580 | 337 | ||||||||||||
Canada |
60 | 7 | 528 | 155 | ||||||||||||
Egypt (1) |
15 | | 172 | 44 | ||||||||||||
Australia |
26 | | 965 | 186 | ||||||||||||
North Sea |
19 | | 23 | 23 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Proved Undeveloped |
290 | 77 | 2,268 | 745 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
TOTAL PROVED |
1,074 | 282 | 6,238 | 2,396 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes total proved reserves of 93 MMboe attributable to a one-third noncontrolling interest in Egypt |
As of December 31, 2014, Apache had total estimated proved reserves of 1,074 MMbbls of crude oil, 282 MMbbls of NGLs, and 6.2 Tcf of natural gas. Combined, these total estimated proved reserves are the energy equivalent of 2.4 billion barrels of oil or 14.4 Tcf of natural gas, of which oil represents 44.8 percent. As of December 31, 2014, the Companys proved developed reserves totaled 1,651 MMboe and estimated PUD reserves totaled 745 MMboe, or approximately 31 percent of worldwide total proved reserves. Apache has elected not to disclose probable or possible reserves in this filing.
The Companys estimates of proved reserves, proved developed reserves and PUD reserves as of December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, changes in estimated proved reserves during the last three years, and estimates of future net cash flows from proved reserves are contained in Note 14Supplemental Oil and Gas Disclosures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K. Estimated future net cash flows were calculated using a discount rate of 10 percent per annum, end of period costs, and an unweighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect on the first day of each of the previous 12 months, held flat for the life of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements.
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
The Companys total estimated PUD reserves of 745 MMboe as of December 31, 2014, decreased by 68 MMboe from 813 MMboe of PUD reserves estimated at the end of 2013. During the year, Apache converted 134 MMboe of PUD reserves to proved developed reserves through development drilling activity. In North America, we converted 108 MMboe, with the remaining 26 MMboe in our international areas. We sold 150 MMboe and acquired 18 MMboe of PUD reserves during the year. We added 197 MMboe of new PUD reserves through extensions and discoveries.
During the year, a total of approximately $3.6 billion was spent on projects associated with reserves that were carried as PUD reserves at the end of 2013. A portion of our costs incurred each year relate to development
13
projects that will be converted to proved developed reserves in future years. We spent $1.9 billion on PUD reserve development activity in North America and $1.7 billion in the international areas. Other than our Julimar/Brunello development project, which is tied to the construction schedule of the Wheatstone LNG project, with projected first production in 2016, we had no material amounts of PUD reserves that have remained undeveloped for five years or more after they were initially disclosed as PUD reserves and no material amounts of PUD reserves which are scheduled to be developed beyond five years from December 31, 2014.
Preparation of Oil and Gas Reserve Information
Apaches reported reserves are reasonably certain estimates which, by their very nature, are subject to revision. These estimates are reviewed throughout the year and revised either upward or downward, as warranted.
Apaches proved reserves are estimated at the property level and compiled for reporting purposes by a centralized group of experienced reservoir engineers that is independent of the operating groups. These engineers interact with engineering and geoscience personnel in each of Apaches operating areas and with accounting and marketing employees to obtain the necessary data for projecting future production, costs, net revenues, and ultimate recoverable reserves. All relevant data is compiled in a computer database application, to which only authorized personnel are given security access rights consistent with their assigned job function. Reserves are reviewed internally with senior management and presented to Apaches Board of Directors in summary form on a quarterly basis. Annually, each property is reviewed in detail by our corporate and operating region engineers to ensure forecasts of operating expenses, netback prices, production trends, and development timing are reasonable.
Apaches Executive Vice President of Corporate Reservoir Engineering is the person primarily responsible for overseeing the preparation of our internal reserve estimates and for coordinating any reserves audits conducted by a third-party engineering firm. He has a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering and over 30 years of industry experience with positions of increasing responsibility within Apaches corporate reservoir engineering department. The Executive Vice President of Corporate Reservoir Engineering reports directly to our Chief Executive Officer.
The estimate of reserves disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is prepared by the Companys internal staff, and the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of those estimates. However, the Company engages Ryder Scott Company, L.P. Petroleum Consultants (Ryder Scott) to review our processes and the reasonableness of our estimates of proved hydrocarbon liquid and gas reserves. Apache selects the properties for review by Ryder Scott based primarily on relative reserve value. We also consider other factors such as geographic location, new wells drilled during the year and reserves volume. During 2014, the properties selected for each country ranged from 83 to 100 percent of the total future net cash flows discounted at 10 percent. These properties also accounted for over 96 percent of the reserves value of our international proved reserves and of the new wells drilled in each country. In addition, all fields containing five percent or more of the Companys total proved reserves volume were included in Ryder Scotts review. The review covered 85 percent of total proved reserves, including 91 percent of proved developed reserves and 72 percent of PUD reserves.
During 2014, 2013, and 2012, Ryder Scotts review covered 91, 92, and 88 percent, respectively, of the Companys worldwide estimated proved reserves value and 85, 86, and 83 percent, respectively, of the Companys total proved reserves volume. Ryder Scotts review of 2014 covered 83 percent of U.S, 75 percent of Canada, 99.5 percent of Australia, 86 percent of Egypt, and 94 percent of the U.K.s total proved reserves.
Ryder Scotts review of 2013 covered 84 percent of U.S., 82 percent of Canada, 63 percent of Argentina, 99 percent of Australia, 88 percent of Egypt, and 88 percent of the U.K.s total proved reserves.
Ryder Scotts review of 2012 covered 81 percent of U.S., 78 percent of Canada, 64 percent of Argentina, 99 percent of Australia, 84 percent of Egypt, and 88 percent of the U.K.s total proved reserves.
14
We have filed Ryder Scotts independent report as an exhibit to this Form 10-K.
According to Ryder Scotts opinion, based on their review, including the data, technical processes, and interpretations presented by Apache, the overall procedures and methodologies utilized by Apache in determining the proved reserves comply with the current SEC regulations, and the overall proved reserves for the reviewed properties as estimated by Apache are, in aggregate, reasonable within the established audit tolerance guidelines as set forth in the Society of Petroleum Engineers auditing standards.
Employees
On December 31, 2014, we had 4,950 employees.
Offices
Our principal executive offices are located at One Post Oak Central, 2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77056-4400. At year-end 2014, we maintained regional exploration and/or production offices in Midland, Texas; San Antonio, Texas; Tulsa, Oklahoma; Houston, Texas; Calgary, Alberta; Cairo, Egypt; Perth, Western Australia; and Aberdeen, Scotland. Apache leases all of its primary office space. The current lease on our principal executive offices runs through December 31, 2018. For information regarding the Companys obligations under its office leases, please see Part II, Item 7Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCapital Resources and LiquidityContractual Obligations and Note 8Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.
Title to Interests
As is customary in our industry, a preliminary review of title records, which may include opinions or reports of appropriate professionals or counsel, is made at the time we acquire properties. We believe that our title to all of the various interests set forth above is satisfactory and consistent with the standards generally accepted in the oil and gas industry, subject only to immaterial exceptions that do not detract substantially from the value of the interests or materially interfere with their use in our operations. The interests owned by us may be subject to one or more royalty, overriding royalty, or other outstanding interests (including disputes related to such interests) customary in the industry. The interests may additionally be subject to obligations or duties under applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and orders of arbitral or governmental authorities. In addition, the interests may be subject to burdens such as production payments, net profits interests, liens incident to operating agreements and current taxes, development obligations under oil and gas leases, and other encumbrances, easements, and restrictions, none of which detract substantially from the value of the interests or materially interfere with their use in our operations.
Additional Information about Apache
In this section, references to we, us, our, and Apache include Apache Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise specifically stated.
Remediation Plans and Procedures
Apache and its wholly owned subsidiary, Apache Deepwater LLC (ADW), developed Oil Spill Response Plans (the Plans) for their respective Gulf of Mexico operations to ensure rapid and effective responses to spill events that may occur on such entities operated properties as required by the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE). Annually, drills are conducted to measure and maintain the effectiveness of the Plans. These drills include the participation of spill response contractors, representatives of Clean Gulf Associates (CGA), and representatives of governmental agencies.
15
In the event of a spill, CGA is the primary oil spill response association available to Apache and ADW. Both Apache and ADW are members of CGA, a not-for-profit association of producing and pipeline companies operating in the Gulf of Mexico. CGA was created to provide a means of effectively staging response equipment and providing immediate spill response for its member companies operations in the Gulf of Mexico. In the event of a spill, CGAs equipment, which is positioned at various staging points around the Gulf, is ready to be mobilized.
In the event that CGA resources are already being utilized, other resources are available to Apache. Apache is a member of Oil Spill Response Limited (OSRL), which entitles any Apache entity worldwide to access OSRLs service. In addition, ADW is a member of Marine Spill Response Corporation (MSRC) and National Response Corporation (NRC), and their resources are available to ADW for its deepwater Gulf of Mexico operations. The equipment and resources available to MSRC and NRC changes from time to time, and current information is generally available on each companys website.
An Apache subsidiary is also a member of the Marine Well Containment Company (MWCC) to help the Company fulfill the governments permit requirements for containment and oil spill response plans in deepwater Gulf of Mexico operations. MWCC is a not-for-profit, stand-alone organization whose goal is to improve capabilities for containing an underwater well control incident in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Members and their affiliates have access to MWCCs extensive containment network and systems. As of December 31, 2014, Apaches investment in MWCC totals approximately $170 million.
Competitive Conditions
The oil and gas business is highly competitive in the exploration for and acquisitions of reserves, the acquisition of oil and gas leases, equipment and personnel required to find and produce reserves, and in the gathering and marketing of oil, gas, and natural gas liquids. Our competitors include national oil companies, major integrated oil and gas companies, other independent oil and gas companies, and participants in other industries supplying energy and fuel to industrial, commercial, and individual consumers.
Certain of our competitors may possess financial or other resources substantially larger than we possess or have established strategic long-term positions and maintain strong governmental relationships in countries in which we may seek new entry. As a consequence, we may be at a competitive disadvantage in bidding for leases or drilling rights.
However, we believe our diversified portfolio of core assets, which comprises large acreage positions and well-established production bases across five countries, our balanced production mix between oil and gas, our management and incentive systems, and our experienced personnel give us a strong competitive position relative to many of our competitors who do not possess similar geographic and production diversity. Our global position provides a large inventory of geologic and geographic opportunities in the five countries in which we have producing operations to which we can reallocate capital investments in response to changes in commodity prices, local business environments, and markets. It also reduces the risk that we will be materially impacted by an event in a specific area or country.
Environmental Compliance
As an owner or lessee and operator of oil and gas properties and facilities, we are subject to numerous federal, provincial, state, local, and foreign country laws and regulations relating to discharge of materials into, and protection of, the environment. These laws and regulations may, among other things, impose liability on the lessee under an oil and gas lease for the cost of pollution clean-up resulting from operations, subject the lessee to liability for pollution damages and require suspension or cessation of operations in affected areas. Although environmental requirements have a substantial impact upon the energy industry, as a whole, we do not believe that these requirements affect us differently, to any material degree, than other companies in our industry.
16
We have made and will continue to make expenditures in our efforts to comply with these requirements, which we believe are necessary business costs in the oil and gas industry. We have established policies for continuing compliance with environmental laws and regulations, including regulations applicable to our operations in all countries in which we do business. We have established operating procedures and training programs designed to limit the environmental impact of our field facilities and identify and comply with changes in existing laws and regulations. The costs incurred under these policies and procedures are inextricably connected to normal operating expenses such that we are unable to separate expenses related to environmental matters; however, we do not believe expenses related to training and compliance with regulations and laws that have been adopted or enacted to regulate the discharge of materials into the environment will have a material impact on our capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position.
17
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
Our business activities and the value of our securities are subject to significant hazards and risks, including those described below. If any of such events should occur, our business, financial condition, liquidity, and/or results of operations could be materially harmed, and holders and purchasers of our securities could lose part or all of their investments. Additional risks relating to our securities may be included in the prospectuses for securities we issue in the future.
Crude oil and natural gas price volatility, including the recent decline in prices for oil and natural gas, could adversely affect our operating results and the price of our common stock.
Our revenues, operating results, and future rate of growth depend highly upon the prices we receive for our crude oil and natural gas production. Historically, the markets for crude oil and natural gas have been volatile and are likely to continue to be volatile in the future. For example, the NYMEX daily settlement price for the prompt month oil contract in 2014 ranged from a high of $107.26 per barrel to a low of $53.27 per barrel. The NYMEX daily settlement price for the prompt month natural gas contract in 2014 ranged from a high of $6.15 per MMBtu to a low of $2.89 per MMBtu. The market prices for crude oil and natural gas depend on factors beyond our control. These factors include demand for crude oil and natural gas, which fluctuates with changes in market and economic conditions, and other factors, including:
| worldwide and domestic supplies of crude oil and natural gas; |
| actions taken by foreign oil and gas producing nations; |
| political conditions and events (including instability, changes in governments, or armed conflict) in crude oil or natural gas producing regions; |
| the level of global crude oil and natural gas inventories; |
| the price and level of imported foreign crude oil and natural gas; |
| the price and availability of alternative fuels, including coal and biofuels; |
| the availability of pipeline capacity and infrastructure; |
| the availability of crude oil transportation and refining capacity; |
| weather conditions; |
| domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxes; and |
| the overall economic environment. |
Our results of operations, as well as the carrying value of our oil and gas properties, are substantially dependent upon the prices of oil and natural gas, which have declined significantly since June 2014. Lower crude oil and natural gas prices for an extended period may have the following effects on our business:
| limiting our financial condition, liquidity, and/or ability to fund planned capital expenditures and operations; |
| reducing the amount of crude oil and natural gas that we can produce economically; |
| causing us to delay or postpone some of our capital projects; |
| reducing our revenues, operating income, and cash flows; |
| limiting our access to sources of capital, such as equity and long-term debt; |
| reducing the carrying value of our crude oil and natural gas properties resulting in additional non-cash write-downs; or |
| reducing the carrying value of goodwill. |
18
Our ability to sell natural gas or oil and/or receive market prices for our natural gas or oil may be adversely affected by pipeline and gathering system capacity constraints and various transportation interruptions.
A portion of our natural gas and oil production in any region may be interrupted, limited, or shut in, from time to time for numerous reasons, including as a result of weather conditions, accidents, loss of pipeline or gathering system access, field labor issues or strikes, or capital constraints that limit the ability of third parties to construct gathering systems, processing facilities, or interstate pipelines to transport our production, or we might voluntarily curtail production in response to market conditions. If a substantial amount of our production is interrupted at the same time, it could temporarily adversely affect our cash flows.
Future economic conditions in the U.S. and certain international markets may materially adversely impact our operating results.
Current global market conditions, and uncertainty, including economic instability in Europe and certain emerging markets, is likely to have significant long-term effects. Global economic growth drives demand for energy from all sources, including fossil fuels. A lower future economic growth rate could result in decreased demand growth for our crude oil and natural gas production as well as lower commodity prices, which would reduce our cash flows from operations and our profitability.
Weather and climate may have a significant adverse impact on our revenues and productivity.
Demand for oil and natural gas are, to a degree, dependent on weather and climate, which impact the price we receive for the commodities we produce. In addition, our exploration and development activities and equipment can be adversely affected by severe weather, such as freezing temperatures, hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico, storms in the North Sea, or cyclones offshore Australia, which may cause a loss of production from temporary cessation of activity or lost or damaged equipment. Our planning for normal climatic variation, insurance programs, and emergency recovery plans may inadequately mitigate the effects of such weather conditions, and not all such effects can be predicted, eliminated, or insured against.
Our operations involve a high degree of operational risk, particularly risk of personal injury, damage, or loss of equipment, and environmental accidents.
Our operations are subject to hazards and risks inherent in the drilling, production, and transportation of crude oil and natural gas, including:
| well blowouts, explosions, and cratering; |
| pipeline or other facility ruptures and spills; |
| fires; |
| formations with abnormal pressures; |
| equipment malfunctions; |
| hurricanes, storms, and/or cyclones, which could affect our operations in areas such as on- and offshore the Gulf Coast, North Sea, and Australia, and other natural disasters and weather conditions; and |
| surface spillage and surface or ground water contamination from petroleum constituents, saltwater, or hydraulic fracturing chemical additives. |
Failure or loss of equipment as the result of equipment malfunctions, cyber attacks, or natural disasters such as hurricanes, could result in property damages, personal injury, environmental pollution and other damages for which we could be liable. Litigation arising from a catastrophic occurrence, such as a well blowout, explosion, or fire at a location where our equipment and services are used, or ground water contamination from hydraulic fracturing chemical additives may result in substantial claims for damages. Ineffective containment of a drilling
19
well blowout or pipeline rupture, or surface spillage and surface or ground water contamination from petroleum constituents or hydraulic fracturing chemical additives could result in extensive environmental pollution and substantial remediation expenses. If a significant amount of our production is interrupted, our containment efforts prove to be ineffective or litigation arises as the result of a catastrophic occurrence, our cash flows, and, in turn, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Cyber attacks targeting systems and infrastructure used by the oil and gas industry may adversely impact our operations.
Our business has become increasingly dependent on digital technologies to conduct certain exploration, development and production activities. We depend on digital technology to estimate quantities of oil and gas reserves, process and record financial and operating data, analyze seismic and drilling information, communicate with our employees and third party partners, and conduct many of our activities. Unauthorized access to our digital technology could lead to operational disruption, data corruption or exposure, communication interruption, loss of intellectual property, loss of confidential and fiduciary data, loss or corruption of reserves or other proprietary information. Also, digital technologies control nearly all of the oil and gas distribution and refining systems in the United States and abroad which are necessary to transport and market our production. A cyber attack directed at oil and gas distribution systems could damage critical distribution and storage assets or the environment, delay or prevent delivery of production to markets and make it difficult or impossible to accurately account for production and settle transactions.
While we have experienced cyber attacks, we have not suffered any material losses relating to such attacks; however, there is no assurance that we will not suffer such losses in the future. Further, as cyber attacks continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any vulnerabilities to cyber attacks.
The enactment of new or stricter laws and regulations and other related developments in the Gulf of Mexico as well as our other locations following the Deepwater Horizon incident could adversely affect Apaches business.
In response to the Deepwater Horizon incident in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico in April 2010, and as directed by the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) issued new guidelines and regulations regarding safety, environmental matters, drilling equipment, and decommissioning applicable to drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. These new regulations imposed additional requirements with respect to development and production activities in the Gulf of Mexico and delayed the approval of applications to drill in both deepwater and shallow-water areas.
The enactment of new or stricter regulations in the United States and other countries and increased liability for companies operating in this sector could adversely affect Apaches operations in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico as well as in our other locations.
Our commodity price risk management and trading activities may prevent us from benefiting fully from price increases and may expose us to other risks.
To the extent that we engage in price risk management activities to protect ourselves from commodity price declines, we may be prevented from realizing the benefits of price increases above the levels of the derivative instruments used to manage price risk. In addition, our hedging arrangements may expose us to the risk of financial loss in certain circumstances, including instances in which:
| our production falls short of the hedged volumes; |
| there is a widening of price-basis differentials between delivery points for our production and the delivery point assumed in the hedge arrangement; |
20
| the counterparties to our hedging or other price risk management contracts fail to perform under those arrangements; or |
| an unexpected event materially impacts oil and natural gas prices. |
The credit risk of financial institutions could adversely affect us.
We have exposure to different counterparties, and we have entered into transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including commercial banks, investment banks, insurance companies, other investment funds, and other institutions. These transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of default of our counterparty. Deterioration in the credit markets may impact the credit ratings of our current and potential counterparties and affect their ability to fulfill their existing obligations to us and their willingness to enter into future transactions with us. We have exposure to financial institutions in the form of derivative transactions in connection with our hedges and insurance companies in the form of claims under our policies. In addition, if any lender under our credit facility is unable to fund its commitment, our liquidity will be reduced by an amount up to the aggregate amount of such lenders commitment under our credit facility.
We are exposed to counterparty credit risk as a result of our receivables.
We are exposed to risk of financial loss from trade, joint venture, joint interest billing, and other receivables. We sell our crude oil, natural gas, and NGLs to a variety of purchasers. As operator, we pay expenses and bill our non-operating partners for their respective shares of costs. Some of our purchasers and non-operating partners may experience liquidity problems and may not be able to meet their financial obligations. Nonperformance by a trade creditor or non-operating partner could result in significant financial losses.
A downgrade in our credit rating could negatively impact our cost of and ability to access capital.
We receive debt ratings from the major credit rating agencies in the United States. Factors that may impact our credit ratings include debt levels, planned asset purchases or sales, and near-term and long-term production growth opportunities. Liquidity, asset quality, cost structure, product mix, and commodity pricing levels and others are also considered by the rating agencies. We have been placed on negative watch by one rating agency and negative outlook by another rating agency. A ratings downgrade could adversely impact our ability to access debt markets in the future, increase the cost of future debt, and potentially require us to post letters of credit or other forms of collateral for certain obligations.
Market conditions may restrict our ability to obtain funds for future development and working capital needs, which may limit our financial flexibility.
The credit markets are subject to fluctuation and are vulnerable to unpredictable shocks. We have a significant development project inventory and an extensive exploration portfolio, which will require substantial future investment. We and/or our partners may need to seek financing in order to fund these or other future activities. Our future access to capital, as well as that of our partners and contractors, could be limited if the debt or equity markets are constrained. This could significantly delay development of our property interests.
Our ability to declare and pay dividends is subject to limitations.
The payment of future dividends on our capital stock is subject to the discretion of our board of directors, which considers, among other factors, our operating results, overall financial condition, credit-risk considerations, and capital requirements, as well as general business and market conditions. Our board of directors is not required to declare dividends on our common stock and may decide not to declare dividends.
Any indentures and other financing agreements that we enter into in the future may limit our ability to pay cash dividends on our capital stock, including common stock. In addition, under Delaware law, dividends on capital stock may only be paid from surplus, which is defined as the amount by which our total assets exceeds
21
the sum of our total liabilities, including contingent liabilities, and the amount of our capital; if there is no surplus, cash dividends on capital stock may only be paid from our net profits for the then current and/or the preceding fiscal year. Further, even if we are permitted under our contractual obligations and Delaware law to pay cash dividends on common stock, we may not have sufficient cash to pay dividends in cash on our common stock.
Discoveries or acquisitions of additional reserves are needed to avoid a material decline in reserves and production.
The production rate from oil and gas properties generally declines as reserves are depleted, while related per-unit production costs generally increase as a result of decreasing reservoir pressures and other factors. Therefore, unless we add reserves through exploration and development activities or, through engineering studies, identify additional behind-pipe zones, secondary recovery reserves, or tertiary recovery reserves, or acquire additional properties containing proved reserves, our estimated proved reserves will decline materially as reserves are produced. Future oil and gas production is, therefore, highly dependent upon our level of success in acquiring or finding additional reserves on an economic basis. Furthermore, if oil or gas prices increase, our cost for additional reserves could also increase.
We may not realize an adequate return on wells that we drill.
Drilling for oil and gas involves numerous risks, including the risk that we will not encounter commercially productive oil or gas reservoirs. The wells we drill or participate in may not be productive, and we may not recover all or any portion of our investment in those wells. The seismic data and other technologies we use do not allow us to know conclusively prior to drilling a well that crude or natural gas is present or may be produced economically. The costs of drilling, completing, and operating wells are often uncertain, and drilling operations may be curtailed, delayed, or canceled as a result of a variety of factors including, but not limited to:
| unexpected drilling conditions; |
| pressure or irregularities in formations; |
| equipment failures or accidents; |
| fires, explosions, blowouts, and surface cratering; |
| marine risks such as capsizing, collisions, and hurricanes; |
| other adverse weather conditions; and |
| increases in the cost of, or shortages or delays in the availability of, drilling rigs and equipment. |
Future drilling activities may not be successful, and, if unsuccessful, this failure could have an adverse effect on our future results of operations and financial condition. While all drilling, whether developmental or exploratory, involves these risks, exploratory drilling involves greater risks of dry holes or failure to find commercial quantities of hydrocarbons.
Material differences between the estimated and actual timing of critical events or costs may affect the completion and commencement of production from development projects.
We are involved in several large development projects and the completion of these projects may be delayed beyond our anticipated completion dates. Our projects may be delayed by project approvals from joint venture partners, timely issuances of permits and licenses by governmental agencies, weather conditions, manufacturing and delivery schedules of critical equipment, and other unforeseen events. Delays and differences between estimated and actual timing of critical events may adversely affect our large development projects and our ability to participate in large-scale development projects in the future. In addition, our estimates of future development costs are based on current expectation of prices and other costs of equipment and personell we will need to
22
implement such projects. Our actual future development costs may be significantly higher than we currently estimate. If costs become too high, our development projects may become uneconomic to us and we may be forced to abandon such development projects.
We may fail to fully identify potential problems related to acquired reserves or to properly estimate those reserves.
Although we perform a review of properties that we acquire that we believe is consistent with industry practices, such reviews are inherently incomplete. It generally is not feasible to review in-depth every individual property involved in each acquisition. Ordinarily, we will focus our review efforts on the higher-value properties and will sample the remainder. However, even a detailed review of records and properties may not necessarily reveal existing or potential problems, nor will it permit us as a buyer to become sufficiently familiar with the properties to assess fully and accurately their deficiencies and potential. Inspections may not always be performed on every well, and environmental problems, such as groundwater contamination, are not necessarily observable even when an inspection is undertaken. Even when problems are identified, we often assume certain environmental and other risks and liabilities in connection with acquired properties. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved oil and gas reserves and future production rates and costs with respect to acquired properties, and actual results may vary substantially from those assumed in the estimates. In addition, there can be no assurance that acquisitions will not have an adverse effect upon our operating results, particularly during the periods in which the operations of acquired businesses are being integrated into our ongoing operations.
The BP Acquisition and/or our liabilities could be adversely affected in the event one or more of the BP entities become the subject of a bankruptcy case.
In the event that one or more of the BP entities were to become the subject of a case or proceeding under Title 11 of the United States Code or any other relevant insolvency law or similar law (which we collectively refer to as Insolvency Laws), a court may find that the three definitive purchase and sale agreements (the BP Purchase Agreements) we entered into in connection with our 2010 acquisition of properties from BP (the BP Properties) are executory contracts, in which case such BP entities may, subject to relevant Insolvency Laws, have the right to reject the agreements and refuse to perform their future obligations under them. In this event, our ability to enforce our rights under the BP Purchase Agreements could be adversely affected.
Additionally, in a case or proceeding under relevant Insolvency Laws, a court may find that the sale of the BP Properties constitutes a constructive fraudulent conveyance that should be set aside. While the tests for determining whether a transfer of assets constitutes a constructive fraudulent conveyance vary among jurisdictions, such a determination generally requires that the seller received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for such transfer or obligation and the seller was insolvent at the time of the transaction, or was rendered insolvent or left with unreasonably small capital to meet its anticipated business needs as a result of the transaction. The applicable time periods for such a finding also vary among jurisdictions, but generally range from two to six years. If a court were to make such a determination in a proceeding under relevant Insolvency Laws, our rights under the BP Purchase Agreements, and our rights to the BP Properties, could be adversely affected.
Crude oil and natural gas reserves are estimates, and actual recoveries may vary significantly.
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating crude oil and natural gas reserves and their value. Reservoir engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of crude oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. Because of the high degree of judgment involved, the accuracy of any reserve estimate is inherently imprecise, and a function of the quality of available data and the engineering and geological interpretation. Our reserves estimates are based on 12-month average prices, except where contractual arrangements exist; therefore, reserves quantities will change when actual prices increase or decrease.
23
In addition, results of drilling, testing, and production may substantially change the reserve estimates for a given reservoir over time. The estimates of our proved reserves and estimated future net revenues also depend on a number of factors and assumptions that may vary considerably from actual results, including:
| historical production from the area compared with production from other areas; |
| the effects of regulations by governmental agencies, including changes to severance and excise taxes; |
| future operating costs and capital expenditures; and |
| workover and remediation costs. |
For these reasons, estimates of the economically recoverable quantities of crude oil and natural gas attributable to any particular group of properties, classifications of those reserves and estimates of the future net cash flows expected from them prepared by different engineers or by the same engineers but at different times may vary substantially. Accordingly, reserves estimates may be subject to upward or downward adjustment, and actual production, revenue and expenditures with respect to our reserves likely will vary, possibly materially, from estimates.
Additionally, because some of our reserves estimates are calculated using volumetric analysis, those estimates are less reliable than the estimates based on a lengthy production history. Volumetric analysis involves estimating the volume of a reservoir based on the net feet of pay of the structure and an estimation of the area covered by the structure. In addition, realization or recognition of proved undeveloped reserves will depend on our development schedule and plans. A change in future development plans for proved undeveloped reserves could cause the discontinuation of the classification of these reserves as proved.
Certain of our undeveloped leasehold acreage is subject to leases that will expire over the next several years unless production is established on units containing the acreage.
A sizeable portion of our acreage is currently undeveloped. Unless production in paying quantities is established on units containing certain of these leases during their terms, the leases will expire. If our leases expire, we will lose our right to develop the related properties. Our drilling plans for these areas are subject to change based upon various factors, including drilling results, oil and natural gas prices, the availability and cost of capital, drilling, and production costs, availability of drilling services and equipment, gathering system and pipeline transportation constraints, and regulatory approvals.
We may incur significant costs related to environmental matters.
As an owner or lessee and operator of oil and gas properties, we are subject to various federal, provincial, state, local, and foreign country laws and regulations relating to discharge of materials into, and protection of, the environment. These laws and regulations may, among other things, impose liability on the lessee under an oil and gas lease for the cost of pollution clean-up and other remediation activities resulting from operations, subject the lessee to liability for pollution and other damages, limit or constrain operations in affected areas, and require suspension or cessation of operations in affected areas. Our efforts to limit our exposure to such liability and cost may prove inadequate and result in significant adverse effects to our results of operations. In addition, it is possible that the increasingly strict requirements imposed by environmental laws and enforcement policies could require us to make significant capital expenditures. Such capital expenditures could adversely impact our cash flows and our financial condition.
Our North American operations are subject to governmental risks that may impact our operations.
Our North American operations have been, and at times in the future may be, affected by political developments and by federal, state, provincial, and local laws and regulations such as restrictions on production, changes in taxes, royalties and other amounts payable to governments or governmental agencies, price or
24
gathering rate controls, and environmental protection laws and regulations. New political developments, laws, and regulations may adversely impact our results of operations.
Pending regulations related to emissions and the impact of any changes in climate could adversely impact our business.
Certain countries where we operate, including Canada and the United Kingdom, either tax or assess some form of greenhouse gas (GHG) related fees on our operations. Exposure has not been material to date, although a change in existing regulations could adversely affect our cash flows and results of operations.
In the event the predictions for rising temperatures and sea levels suggested by reports of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change do transpire, we do not believe those events by themselves are likely to impact our assets or operations. However, any increase in severe weather could have a material adverse effect on our assets and operations.
The proposed U.S. federal budget for fiscal year 2016 includes certain provisions that, if passed as originally submitted, will have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
On February 2, 2015, the Office of Management and Budget released a summary of the proposed U.S. federal budget for fiscal year 2016. The proposed budget repeals many tax incentives and deductions that are currently used by U.S. oil and gas companies. These provisions include elimination of the ability to fully deduct intangible drilling costs in the year incurred; increases in the taxation of foreign source income; repeal of the manufacturing tax deduction for oil and natural gas companies; and an increase in the geological and geophysical amortization period for independent producers. Should some or all of these provisions become law, our taxes will increase, potentially significantly, which would have a negative impact on our net income and cash flows. This could also cause us to reduce our drilling activities in the U.S. Since none of these proposals have yet to be voted on or become law, we do not know the ultimate impact these proposed changes may have on our business.
Derivatives regulation included in current or proposed financial legislation and rulemaking could impede our ability to manage business and financial risks by impacting our use of derivative instruments as hedges against fluctuating commodity prices.
The Dodd-Frank Act, which was signed into law in July 2010, contains significant derivatives regulation. The Act provides for a potential exception from these clearing and collateral requirements for commercial end-users and it includes a number of defined terms that will be used in determining how this exception applies to particular derivative transactions and the parties to those transactions. We expect to qualify as a commercial end-user. As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the Commodities Futures and Trading Commission (CFTC) has promulgated numerous rules to define these terms. The CFTC, in conjunction with prudential regulators, have proposed rules for financial counterparties entering into swap transactions with end-users that do not mandate margin. Further, a recent piece of legislation, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015, amended the Dodd-Frank Act such that neither the CFTC nor the prudential regulators can enact rules requiring mandatory margin from entities that qualify as commercial end-users. However, the CFTC is expected to issue rules regarding capital requirements for swap dealers later this year. These rules could cause swap dealers subject to them, to seek to require collateral from their counterparties to avoid reserving balance sheet against exposures.
From time to time, we use derivative instruments with respect to a portion of our expected crude oil and natural gas production in order to reduce the impact of commodity price fluctuations and enhance the stability of cash flows to support our capital investment programs and acquisitions. Given our current investment grade status, we would not anticipate that our derivative contracts should require the posting of margin regardless of the size of our liability positions. However, depending on the rules and definitions adopted by the CFTC, our counterparties may be subject to regulation that could cause them to seek that we post significant amounts of
25
collateral with our dealer counterparties for derivative transactions to avoid capital charges by their regulator. Requirements to post cash collateral could result in negative impacts on our liquidity and financial flexibility and also cause us to incur additional debt and/or reduce capital investment.
Proposed federal, state, or local regulation regarding hydraulic fracturing could increase our operating and capital costs.
Several proposals are before the U.S. Congress that, if implemented, would either prohibit or restrict the practice of hydraulic fracturing or subject the process to regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Several states are considering legislation to regulate hydraulic fracturing practices that could impose more stringent permitting, transparency, and well construction requirements on hydraulic-fracturing operations or otherwise seek to ban fracturing activities altogether. Hydraulic fracturing of wells and subsurface water disposal are also under public and governmental scrutiny due to potential environmental and physical impacts, including possible contamination of groundwater and drinking water and possible links to earthquakes. In addition, some municipalities have significantly limited or prohibited drilling activities and/or hydraulic fracturing, or are considering doing so. We routinely use fracturing techniques in the U.S. and other regions to expand the available space for natural gas and oil to migrate toward the wellbore. It is typically done at substantial depths in very tight formations.
Although it is not possible at this time to predict the final outcome of the legislation regarding hydraulic fracturing, any new federal, state, or local restrictions on hydraulic fracturing that may be imposed in areas in which we conduct business could result in increased compliance costs or additional operating restrictions in the U.S.
A deterioration of conditions in Egypt or changes in the economic and political environment in Egypt could have an adverse impact on our business.
Deterioration in the political, economic, and social conditions or other relevant policies of the Egyptian government, such as changes in laws or regulations, export restrictions, expropriation of our assets or resource nationalization, and/or forced renegotiation or modification of our existing contracts with EGPC, or threats or acts of terrorism by groups such as ISIS, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Our operations in Egypt contributed 23 percent of our 2014 production and accounted for 12 percent of our year-end estimated proved reserves. At year-end 2014, 18 percent of our estimated discounted future net cash flows and 9 percent of our net capitalized oil and gas property was attributable to Egypt. These totals reflect our consolidated interests in Egypt including Sinopecs one-third noncontrolling interest.
International operations have uncertain political, economic, and other risks.
Our operations outside North America are based primarily in Egypt, Australia, and the United Kingdom. On a barrel equivalent basis, approximately 43 percent of our 2014 production was outside North America, and approximately 31 percent of our estimated proved oil and gas reserves on December 31, 2014, were located outside North America. As a result, a significant portion of our production and resources are subject to the increased political and economic risks and other factors associated with international operations including, but not limited to:
| general strikes and civil unrest; |
| the risk of war, acts of terrorism, expropriation and resource nationalization, forced renegotiation or modification of existing contracts; |
| import and export regulations; |
| taxation policies, including royalty and tax increases and retroactive tax claims, and investment restrictions; |
26
| price control; |
| transportation regulations and tariffs; |
| constrained natural gas markets dependent on demand in a single or limited geographical area; |
| exchange controls, currency fluctuations, devaluation, or other activities that limit or disrupt markets and restrict payments or the movement of funds; |
| laws and policies of the United States affecting foreign trade, including trade sanctions; |
| the possibility of being subject to exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts in connection with legal disputes relating to licenses to operate and concession rights in countries where we currently operate; |
| the possible inability to subject foreign persons, especially foreign oil ministries and national oil companies, to the jurisdiction of courts in the United States; and |
| difficulties in enforcing our rights against a governmental agency because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity and foreign sovereignty over international operations. |
Foreign countries have occasionally asserted rights to oil and gas properties through border disputes. If a country claims superior rights to oil and gas leases or concessions granted to us by another country, our interests could decrease in value or be lost. Even our smaller international assets may affect our overall business and results of operations by distracting managements attention from our more significant assets. Certain regions of the world in which we operate have a history of political and economic instability. This instability could result in new governments or the adoption of new policies that might result in a substantially more hostile attitude toward foreign investments such as ours. In an extreme case, such a change could result in termination of contract rights and expropriation of our assets. This could adversely affect our interests and our future profitability.
The impact that future terrorist attacks by groups such as ISIS or regional hostilities as have occurred in Egypt and Libya may have on the oil and gas industry in general, and on our operations in particular, is not known at this time. Uncertainty surrounding military strikes or a sustained military campaign may affect operations in unpredictable ways, including disruptions of fuel supplies and markets, particularly oil, and the possibility that infrastructure facilities, including pipelines, production facilities, processing plants, and refineries, could be direct targets of, or indirect casualties of, an act of terror or war. We may be required to incur significant costs in the future to safeguard our assets against terrorist activities.
Our operations are sensitive to currency rate fluctuations.
Our operations are sensitive to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar, the Australian dollar, and the British Pound. Our financial statements, presented in U.S. dollars, may be affected by foreign currency fluctuations through both translation risk and transaction risk. Volatility in exchange rates may adversely affect our results of operations, particularly through the weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies.
We face strong industry competition that may have a significant negative impact on our results of operations.
Strong competition exists in all sectors of the oil and gas exploration and production industry. We compete with major integrated and other independent oil and gas companies for acquisition of oil and gas leases, properties, and reserves, equipment, and labor required to explore, develop, and operate those properties, and marketing of oil and natural gas production. Crude oil and natural gas prices impact the costs of properties available for acquisition and the number of companies with the financial resources to pursue acquisition opportunities. Many of our competitors have financial and other resources substantially larger than we possess and have established strategic long-term positions and maintain strong governmental relationships in countries in
27
which we may seek new entry. As a consequence, we may be at a competitive disadvantage in bidding for drilling rights. In addition, many of our larger competitors may have a competitive advantage when responding to factors that affect demand for oil and natural gas production, such as fluctuating worldwide commodity prices and levels of production, the cost and availability of alternative fuels, and the application of government regulations. We also compete in attracting and retaining personnel, including geologists, geophysicists, engineers, and other specialists. These competitive pressures may have a significant negative impact on our results of operations.
Our insurance policies do not cover all of the risks we face, which could result in significant financial exposure.
Exploration for and production of crude oil and natural gas can be hazardous, involving natural disasters and other events such as blowouts, cratering, fire and explosion and loss of well control, which can result in damage to or destruction of wells or production facilities, injury to persons, loss of life, or damage to property and the environment. Our international operations are also subject to political risk. The insurance coverage that we maintain against certain losses or liabilities arising from our operations may be inadequate to cover any such resulting liability; moreover, insurance is not available to us against all operational risks.
ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
As of December 31, 2014, we did not have any unresolved comments from the SEC staff that were received 180 or more days prior to year-end.
ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The information set forth under Legal Matters and Environmental Matters in Note 8Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
None.
28
PART II
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
During 2014, Apache common stock, par value $0.625 per share, was traded on the New York and Chicago Stock Exchanges and the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol APA. The table below provides certain information regarding our common stock for 2014 and 2013. Prices were obtained from The New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Composite Transactions Reporting System. Per-share prices and quarterly dividends shown below have been rounded to the indicated decimal place.
2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price Range | Dividends Per Share | Price Range | Dividends Per Share | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High | Low | Declared | Paid | High | Low | Declared | Paid | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 87.91 | $ | 77.31 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 86.35 | $ | 72.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.17 | ||||||||||||||||
Second Quarter |
102.34 | 81.87 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 87.57 | 67.91 | 0.20 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third Quarter |
104.57 | 92.84 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 89.17 | 75.07 | 0.20 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
93.87 | 54.34 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 94.84 | 84.15 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
The closing price of our common stock, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions Reporting System for January 30, 2015 (last trading day of the month), was $62.57 per share. As of January 31, 2015, there were 376,823,368 shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 4,700 stockholders of record and 270,000 beneficial owners.
We have paid cash dividends on our common stock for 50 consecutive years through December 31, 2014. In the first quarter of 2014 the Board of Directors approved a 25 percent increase to $0.25 per share for the regular quarterly cash dividend on the Companys common shares. When, and if, declared by our Board of Directors, future dividend payments will depend upon our level of earnings, financial requirements, and other relevant factors.
In 1995, under our stockholder rights plan, each of our common stockholders received a dividend of one preferred stock purchase right (a Right) for each 2.310 outstanding shares of common stock (adjusted for subsequent stock dividends and a two-for-one stock split) that the stockholder owned. These Rights were originally scheduled to expire on January 31, 2006. Effective as of that date, the Rights were reset to one right per share of common stock, and the expiration was extended to January 31, 2016.
On February 5, 2014, the Companys Board of Directors voted to terminate the Companys stockholder rights plan. As a result of this decision, the Board approved an amendment to the Rights Agreement that had the effect of terminating the Rights. The amendment changed the expiration date to March 7, 2014, and, thereby, accelerated the expiration of the Rights. The amendment was fully executed on March 7, 2014.
Information concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is set forth under the caption Equity Compensation Plan Information in the proxy statement relating to the Companys 2015 annual meeting of stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
29
The following stock price performance graph is intended to allow review of stockholder returns, expressed in terms of the appreciation of the Companys common stock relative to two broad-based stock performance indices. The information is included for historical comparative purposes only and should not be considered indicative of future stock performance. The graph compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return on the Companys common stock with the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poors Composite 500 Stock Index and of the Dow Jones U.S. Exploration & Production Index (formerly Dow Jones Secondary Oil Stock Index) from December 31, 2009, through December 31, 2014. The stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed soliciting material or to be filed with the SEC, nor shall information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
Apache Corporation |
$ | 100.00 | $ | 116.26 | $ | 88.79 | $ | 77.51 | $ | 85.66 | $ | 63.18 | ||||||||||||
S & Ps Composite 500 Stock Index |
100.00 | 115.06 | 117.49 | 136.30 | 180.44 | 205.14 | ||||||||||||||||||
DJ US Expl & Prod Index |
100.00 | 116.74 | 111.85 | 118.36 | 156.05 | 139.24 |
30
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The table below sets forth information with respect to shares of common stock repurchased by Apache during 2014.
Period |
Purchased |
Average
Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1) |
Maximum
Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1) |
||||||||||||
January 1 to January 31, 2014 |
1,164,817 | $ | 85.84 | 1,164,817 | 17,613,264 | |||||||||||
February 1 to February 28, 2014 |
1,020,100 | 84.23 | 1,020,100 | 16,593,164 | ||||||||||||
March 1 to March 31, 2014 |
3,734,166 | 80.00 | 3,734,166 | 12,858,998 | ||||||||||||
April 1 to April 30, 2014 |
4,431,031 | 84.46 | 4,431,031 | 8,427,967 | ||||||||||||
May 1 to May 31, 2014 |
2,876,000 | 88.04 | 2,876,000 | 15,551,967 | ||||||||||||
June 1 to June 30, 2014 |
1,629,305 | 93.70 | 1,629,305 | 13,922,662 | ||||||||||||
July 1 to July 31, 2014 |
| | | 13,922,662 | ||||||||||||
August 1 to August 31, 2014 |
2,504,119 | 99.68 | 2,504,119 | 11,418,543 | ||||||||||||
September 1 to September 30, 2014 |
3,239,674 | 97.93 | 3,239,674 | 8,178,869 | ||||||||||||
October 1 to October 31, 2014 |
351,517 | 94.07 | 351,517 | 7,827,352 | ||||||||||||
November 1 to November 30, 2014 |
| | | 7,827,352 | ||||||||||||
December 1 to December 31, 2014 |
| | | 7,827,352 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
20,950,729 | $ | 89.00 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | In May 2013, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 30 million shares of the Companys common stock. Additionally, on May 15, 2014, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of an additional 10 million shares, supplementing the May 2013 authorization. The Company may buy shares from time to time on the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, or a combination of both. The timing and amounts of any repurchases will be at the discretion of Apaches management and will depend on a variety of factors, including the stock price, corporate and regulatory requirements, and other market and economic conditions. Repurchased shares will be available for general corporate purposes. |
31
ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The following table sets forth selected financial data of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries over the five-year period ended December 31, 2014, which information has been derived from the Companys audited financial statements. This information should be read in connection with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the more detailed information in the Companys financial statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K. As discussed in more detail under Item 15, 2014 numbers in the following table reflect a total of $5.0 billion ($3.1 billion net of tax) in non-cash write-downs of the carrying value of the Companys U.S. and North Sea proved oil and gas properties as a result of ceiling test limitations and asset impairments totaling $2.4 billion ($2.1 billion net of tax) in connection with fair value assessments, including $1.3 billion for the impairment of goodwill, $1.0 billion for the impairment of assets held for sale, and other asset impairments. The 2013 numbers reflect a total of $995 million ($541 million net of tax) in non-cash write-downs of the carrying value of the Companys U.S. and North Sea proved oil and gas properties as a result of ceiling test limitations and a non-cash write-down related to the Companys exit of operations in Kenya. The 2012 numbers reflect a total of $1.9 billion ($1.4 billion net of tax) in non-cash write-downs of the carrying value of the Companys Canadian proved oil and gas properties.
As of or for the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 13,851 | $ | 15,560 | $ | 16,564 | $ | 16,451 | $ | 11,742 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders |
(4,886 | ) | 2,380 | 1,911 | 4,496 | 2,968 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations per share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
(12.72 | ) | 6.02 | 4.91 | 11.72 | 8.44 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted |
(12.72 | ) | 5.97 | 4.89 | 11.44 | 8.37 | ||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share |
1.00 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.60 | |||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 55,952 | $ | 61,637 | $ | 60,737 | $ | 52,051 | $ | 43,425 | ||||||||||
Long-term debt |
11,245 | 9,672 | 11,355 | 6,785 | 8,095 | |||||||||||||||
Total equity |
28,137 | 35,393 | 31,331 | 28,993 | 24,377 | |||||||||||||||
Common shares outstanding |
377 | 396 | 392 | 384 | 382 |
For a discussion of significant acquisitions and divestitures, see Note 2Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.
32
ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Apache Corporation, a Delaware corporation formed in 1954, is an independent energy company that explores for, develops, and produces natural gas, crude oil, and natural gas liquids. We currently have exploration and production interests in five countries: the U.S., Canada, Egypt, Australia, and the U.K. North Sea. Apache also pursues exploration interests in other countries that may over time result in reportable discoveries and development opportunities.
The following discussion should be read together with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K, and the risk factors and related information set forth in Part I, Item 1A and Part II, Item 7A of this Form 10-K.
Executive Overview
Strategy
Apaches mission is to grow a profitable global exploration and production company in a safe and environmentally responsible manner for the long-term benefit of our shareholders. Our growth strategy focuses on economic growth through exploration and development drilling, supplemented by occasional strategic acquisitions and portfolio high-grading through asset divestitures.
The Companys foundation for future growth is driven by our significant producing asset base and large undeveloped acreage positions. This allows for growth through sustainable lower-risk drilling opportunities, balanced by higher-risk, higher-reward exploration. We closely monitor drilling and acquisition cost trends in each of our core areas relative to product prices and, when appropriate, adjust our capital budgets accordingly and allocate funds to projects based on expected value. We do this through a disciplined and focused process that includes analyzing current economic conditions, projected rate of return on internally generated drilling inventories, and opportunities for tactical acquisitions or leasehold purchases that add substantial drilling prospects or, occasionally, provide access to new core areas that could enhance our portfolio.
Over the last five years, Apache has increasingly focused on its North American onshore resource base. Recent drilling successes and acquisitions of acreage positions across North America have built a robust drilling inventory for our Permian, Gulf Coast, and other onshore regions. We believe that this area is capable of driving our growth and performance over the next several years. As part of this strategy, we conducted a company-wide review of our portfolio and our operations in an effort to best position Apache for the long-term benefit of our shareholders. This has resulted in several key divestitures during the last eighteen months and the recent announcement and agreed sale of our Kitimat and Wheatstone LNG projects. We believe our efforts will ultimately position the Company with an established base portfolio of assets that allows for flexibility in capital allocation and provides a platform for sustainable growth. This is especially important given the volatility in oil and gas commodities.
Throughout the cycles of our industry, our focus on having a portfolio of core assets and a conservative capital structure has underpinned our long-term strategic decisions and we remain steadfast to the business principles that have guided Apaches progress since our inception. A strong sense of urgency, empowerment of our employees, effective incentive systems, and an independent mindset are at the heart of how we build value.
2015 Outlook
The rapid decline in the price of oil at the end of 2014 and into the first quarter of 2015 has been dramatic; however, we believe this environment will provide future growth opportunities for companies that have moved aggressively in response to the price drop. As we cannot predict the length or depth of this oil price correction, or the timing and extent of any potential rebound, we have moved quickly and decisively regarding what we can
33
control: the timing and levels of capital spending and our cost structure. Specifically, during the third quarter of 2014 we were operating 91 rigs onshore in North America, and by the end of February 2015, our rig count was reduced to 27 rigs. We also reduced the number of completion crews and will delay completing some of our wells in backlog until the associated service costs align with the current commodity price environment. In addition to well cost initiatives, we have taken steps to reduce both lease operating and general and administrative expenses and will continue to take proactive measures to reduce them further. These actions were taken with the goal of quickly reducing well costs to a level that will enable us to generate profitable rates of return under todays depressed commodity prices environment.
We have initially set our 2015 capital budget at $3.8 billion, which is approximately 60 percent lower than the prior year, as a result of our response to the changing market conditions, operating cash flow forecasts and divested assets. Of this amount, approximately $2.1 billion to $2.3 billion is allocated for projects in North America, with the remaining amount allocated across our international regions. Our budgeted amounts exclude expenditures attributable to a one-third non-controlling interest in Egypt. While some funds have been committed for certain 2015 exploration wells and development projects, the majority of our capital activity is discretionary and subject to acceleration, deferral, or cancelation as conditions warrant. We closely monitor commodity prices, service cost levels, regulatory impacts, and numerous other industry factors and routinely adjust our budgets in response to changing market conditions and operating cash flow forecasts. With the current capital program, we are projecting our production to be relatively flat compared to 2014, when adjusting for divested assets.
Key Financial and Operating Results
Results for the year ended December 31, 2014 include:
| Daily production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids averaged 647 Mboe/d during 2014. Excluding the impact of the recently divested assets in the Gulf of Mexico shelf, Canada, and South Texas, production for the year would have increased 5 percent from 2013. |
| Liquids production for the year averaged 387 Mboe/d, with crude oil representing 83 percent of total liquids production. North American onshore liquids production increased 17 percent, averaging 209 Mboe/d in 2014 compared to 179 Mboe/d in 2013. |
| Oil and gas production revenues totaled $13.7 billion, down $2.2 billion from $15.9 billion in 2013, reflecting the impact of divestitures and lower realized prices compared to the prior year. |
| Net cash provided by continuing operating activities totaled $8.4 billion, a decrease of 13 percent compared to 2013. |
| Apache reported a $5.4 billion loss attributable to common stock, or $14.06 per diluted common share, compared to income of $2.2 billion, or $5.50 per share, in 2013. Earnings for 2014 reflect the after-tax impact of oil and gas property write-downs totaling $3.1 billion, impairments totaling $2.1 billion, deferred tax adjustments totaling $2.1 billion, and a $517 million loss on discontinued operations in Argentina. Earnings for 2013 reflect the after-tax impact of oil and gas property write-downs totaling $541 million, deferred tax adjustments totaling $197 million, and a $191 million loss on discontinued operations in Argentina. |
Operational Developments
Exploration, Exploitation, and Development Activities
Our internally generated exploration and drilling opportunities provide the foundation for our growth. Highlights of our 2014 drilling successes, exploration discoveries, and other opportunities for long-term growth are discussed below. The prior-year comparisons include volumes from properties in the Gulf of Mexico and Canada that have since been divested.
34
North America
| North America onshore liquids averaged 208,769 barrels per day, up 17 percent over prior year production, as a direct result of our active onshore drilling activity during the year. Gas production in North America onshore was down 16 percent compared to the prior year, a function of divestiture activity. |
| North America onshore liquids production represented 54 percent of our worldwide liquids production and 32 percent of our overall production. |
| The Permian region averaged 40 operated rigs during the year, drilling 728 gross wells, 549 net wells. Drilling activity in the region resulted in a production increase of 25 percent relative to the prior year. Over half of the regions production is crude oil and 19 percent is NGLs. Combined, this represents almost a third of Apaches total liquids production for 2014. |
| The Central region averaged 28 operated rigs during the year, drilling 307 gross wells, 203 net wells, in plays such as the Granite Wash, Marmaton and Cleveland. The region has recently shifted its focus to the more prospective prospects in the Canyon Lime play in the Whittenburg basin, where we recently started flow back on our first four-well pad. |
| The Gulf Coast region averaged 9 operated rigs during the year, drilling 77 gross wells, 62 net wells. In the East Texas Eagle Ford play, the region brought on 14 new wells in the Reveille area of Brazos County where we continue to progress the play and enhance our economics by lowering well costs and refining our geological assessment. Liquids production was up 18 percent relative to the prior year. |
| The Canada region averaged 8 operated rigs during the year, drilling 106 gross wells, 88 net wells. Canada further established key plays in the Duvernay and Montney formations with a focus on reducing drilling and completion costs. In the Duvernay, we began drilling our first seven-well pad and expect to see test rates in the third quarter of 2015. Our Montney drilling has been focused in the Wapiti area. |
International
| The Egypt region continued an active drilling program for the year, averaging 27 rigs and drilling 220 gross wells, 195 net wells. Several new field discoveries were announced during the year based on successful drilling and exploration activity. These include Ptah and Berenice field discoveries in the fourth quarter, which appear to be two of Apaches largest oil field discoveries in Egypt over the last 15 years. |
| The North Sea region averaged 5 rigs, drilling 22 gross wells, 19 net wells. During the year, the region was able to achieve record production in the fourth quarter of 80,806 boe/d. Just as significant, the region successfully completed the regularly scheduled annual maintenance turnaround across all operated assets ahead of schedule and without incident. |
| The Australia region announced in August 2014 an oil discovery at the Phoenix South 1 exploration well in Australias offshore Canning Basin. Early tests have confirmed at least four discrete oil columns in the Triassic Lower Keraudren formation. Further drilling and evaluation is planned for 2015. In addition, successful commencement of production from the Balnaves oil development occurred late in the third quarter of 2014. |
| The Australia regions Coniston development project is projected for first oil in the first half of 2015 upon completion of required upgrades and capacity expansion on the FPSO vessel. |
Acquisition and Divestiture Activity
Over the last several years, Apache has high-graded our portfolio through strategic acquisitions and divestments. For detailed information regarding our acquisitions and divestitures, please refer to Note 2
35
Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K. During 2014 and 2013, Apache announced the following significant transactions:
2014 Activity
LNG Projects Divestiture In December 2014, Apache agreed to sell its interest in two LNG projects, Wheatstone LNG in Australia and Kitimat LNG in Canada, along with accompanying upstream oil and gas reserves, to Woodside Petroleum Limited for a purchase price of $2.75 billion plus recovery of Apaches net expenditure in the Wheatstone and Kitimat LNG projects between June 30, 2014, and closing. This transaction is subject to necessary government and regulatory approvals and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2015. As a result of the announced sale of these projects, the LNG facilities and associated downstream assets are classified as held for sale on Apaches consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2014.
Anadarko Basin and Southern Louisiana Divestitures In December 2014, Apache completed the sale of non-core Anadarko basin and southern Louisiana oil and gas assets for approximately $1.3 billion in two separate transactions. In the Anadarko basin, Apache sold approximately 115,000 net acres in Wheeler County, Texas, and western Oklahoma. In southern Louisiana, Apache sold its working interest in approximately 90,000 net acres. The effective date of both of these transactions is October 1, 2014.
Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Divestiture On June 30, 2014, Apache completed the sale of non-operated interests in the Lucius and Heidelberg development projects and 11 primary term deepwater exploration blocks in the Gulf of Mexico for $1.4 billion. The effective date of the transaction was May 1, 2014.
Canada Divestiture On April 30, 2014, Apache completed the sale of primarily dry gas producing hydrocarbon assets in the Deep Basin area of western Alberta and British Columbia, Canada, for $374 million. The assets comprise 328,400 net acres in the Ojay, Noel, and Wapiti areas. Apache retained 100 percent of its working interest in horizons below the Cretaceous in the Wapiti area, including rights to the liquids-rich Montney and other deeper horizons. The effective date of the transaction was January 1, 2014.
Argentina Divestiture On March 12, 2014, Apaches subsidiaries completed the sale of all of the Companys operations in Argentina to YPF Sociedad Anónima for $800 million, subject to customary closing adjustments, plus the assumption of $52 million of bank debt as of June 30, 2013. The results of operations related to Argentina have been classified as discontinued operations in all periods presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Leasehold Acquisitions During 2014, Apache completed $1.3 billion of leasehold acquisitions, substantially increasing its drilling opportunities in key focus areas in North America including the Eagle Ford and Canyon Lime plays.
2013 Activity
Egypt Sinopec Partnership On November 14, 2013, Apache announced the completion of the sale of a one-third minority participation in its Egypt oil and gas business to Sinopec for cash consideration of $2.95 billion after customary closing adjustments. Apache will continue to operate the Egypt upstream oil and gas business.
Gulf of Mexico Shelf Divestiture On September 30, 2013, Apache completed the sale of its Gulf of Mexico Shelf operations and properties to Fieldwood, an affiliate of Riverstone Holdings. Under the terms of the agreement, Apache received cash consideration of $3.7 billion, and Fieldwood assumed $1.5 billion of discounted asset abandonment liabilities. Additionally, Apache retained 50 percent of its ownership interest in all exploration blocks and in horizons below production in developed blocks.
Canadian Divestitures In September, Apache completed sales of primarily dry gas assets for $214 million. The sale includes 621,000 gross acres (530,000 net acres) and more than 2,700 wells. Additionally in October of 2013, Apache completed two additional sales of Canadian oil and gas production properties for $112 million. The assets comprise approximately 4,000 operated and 1,300 non-operated wells.
36
Kitimat LNG Project In February 2013, Apache completed a transaction with Chevron Canada Limited (Chevron Canada) under which each company became a 50 percent owner of the Kitimat LNG plant, the Pacific Trail Pipelines Limited Partnership (PTP), and 644,000 gross undeveloped acres in the Horn River and Liard basins. Apaches net proceeds from the transaction were $396 million after post-closing adjustments.
Leasehold Acquisitions During 2013, Apache completed $215 million of leasehold acquisitions in North America.
Results of Operations
Oil and Gas Revenues
Apaches oil and gas revenues by region are as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ Value | % Contribution | $ Value | % Contribution | $ Value | % Contribution | |||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Oil Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 4,260 | 40 | % | $ | 5,262 | 42 | % | $ | 4,662 | 36 | % | ||||||||||||
Canada |
537 | 5 | % | 563 | 4 | % | 492 | 4 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
North America |
4,797 | 45 | % | 5,825 | 46 | % | 5,154 | 40 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Egypt (3) |
3,126 | 29 | % | 3,528 | 28 | % | 4,050 | 31 | % | |||||||||||||||
Australia |
712 | 6 | % | 779 | 6 | % | 1,218 | 9 | % | |||||||||||||||
North Sea |
2,117 | 20 | % | 2,500 | 20 | % | 2,517 | 20 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
International (3) |
5,955 | 55 | % | 6,807 | 54 | % | 7,785 | 60 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total (1)(3) |
$ | 10,752 | 100 | % | $ | 12,632 | 100 | % | $ | 12,939 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Gas Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 935 | 40 | % | $ | 1,096 | 41 | % | $ | 1,169 | 40 | % | ||||||||||||
Canada |
479 | 21 | % | 587 | 23 | % | 751 | 25 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
North America |
1,414 | 61 | % | 1,683 | 64 | % | 1,920 | 65 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Egypt (3) |
400 | 17 | % | 389 | 15 | % | 504 | 17 | % | |||||||||||||||
Australia |
346 | 15 | % | 361 | 14 | % | 357 | 12 | % | |||||||||||||||
North Sea |
169 | 7 | % | 194 | 7 | % | 188 | 6 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
International (3) |
915 | 39 | % | 944 | 36 | % | 1,049 | 35 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total (2)(3) |
$ | 2,329 | 100 | % | $ | 2,627 | 100 | % | $ | 2,969 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
NGL Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 549 | 82 | % | $ | 544 | 84 | % | $ | 395 | 76 | % | ||||||||||||
Canada |
76 | 12 | % | 74 | 11 | % | 79 | 15 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
North America |
625 | 94 | % | 618 | 95 | % | 474 | 91 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Egypt (3) |
13 | 2 | % | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
North Sea |
30 | 4 | % | 34 | 5 | % | 46 | 9 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
International (3) |
43 | 6 | % | 34 | 5 | % | 46 | 9 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total (3) |
$ | 668 | 100 | % | $ | 652 | 100 | % | $ | 520 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Oil and Gas Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 5,744 | 42 | % | $ | 6,902 | 43 | % | $ | 6,226 | 38 | % | ||||||||||||
Canada |
1,092 | 8 | % | 1,224 | 8 | % | 1,322 | 8 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
North America |
6,836 | 50 | % | 8,126 | 51 | % | 7,548 | 46 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Egypt (3) |
3,539 | 26 | % | 3,917 | 25 | % | 4,554 | 28 | % | |||||||||||||||
Australia |
1,058 | 7 | % | 1,140 | 7 | % | 1,575 | 9 | % | |||||||||||||||
North Sea |
2,316 | 17 | % | 2,728 | 17 | % | 2,751 | 17 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
International (3) |
6,913 | 50 | % | 7,785 | 49 | % | 8,880 | 54 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total (3) |
$ | 13,749 | 100 | % | $ | 15,911 | 100 | % | $ | 16,428 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Discontinued OperationsArgentina |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil Revenue |
45 | 271 | 271 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gas Revenue |
39 | 202 | 224 | |||||||||||||||||||||
NGL Revenue |
3 | 18 | 24 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 87 | $ | 491 | $ | 519 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
(1) | Financial derivative hedging activities decreased 2014, 2013, and 2012 oil revenues $2 million, $47 million, and $146 million, respectively. |
(2) | Financial derivative hedging activities increased 2014, 2013, and 2012 natural gas revenues $2 million, $31 million, and $414 million, respectively. |
(3) | 2014 and 2013 includes revenues attributable to a noncontrolling interest in Egypt. |
Production
The following table presents production volumes by region:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
Increase
(Decrease) |
2013 |
Increase
(Decrease) |
2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Oil Volumeb/d: |
||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
133,667 | (9 | %) | 146,907 | 10 | % | 134,123 | |||||||||||||
Canada |
17,593 | (1 | %) | 17,724 | 12 | % | 15,830 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
North America |
151,260 | (8 | %) | 164,631 | 10 | % | 149,953 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Egypt (1)(2) |
87,917 | (2 | %) | 89,561 | (10 | %) | 99,756 | |||||||||||||
Australia |
20,529 | 6 | % | 19,329 | (33 | %) | 28,884 | |||||||||||||
North Sea |
60,699 | (5 | %) | 63,721 | 0 | % | 63,692 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
International |
169,145 | (2 | %) | 172,611 | (10 | %) | 192,332 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
320,405 | (5 | %) | 337,242 | (1 | %) | 342,285 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Natural Gas VolumeMcf/d: |
||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
591,312 | (24 | %) | 781,335 | (9 | %) | 854,099 | |||||||||||||
Canada |
322,783 | (35 | %) | 497,515 | (17 | %) | 600,680 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
North America |
914,095 | (29 | %) | 1,278,850 | (12 | %) | 1,454,779 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Egypt (1)(2) |
370,262 | 4 | % | 356,454 | 1 | % | 353,738 | |||||||||||||
Australia |
213,983 | (4 | %) | 223,433 | 4 | % | 214,013 | |||||||||||||
North Sea |
55,964 | 10 | % | 50,961 | (11 | %) | 57,457 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
International |
640,209 | 1 | % | 630,848 | 1 | % | 625,208 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
1,554,304 | (19 | %) | 1,909,698 | (8 | %) | 2,079,987 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
NGL Volumeb/d: |
||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
58,807 | 8 | % | 54,580 | 63 | % | 33,527 | |||||||||||||
Canada |
6,180 | (8 | %) | 6,689 | 7 | % | 6,258 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
North America |
64,987 | 6 | % | 61,269 | 54 | % | 39,785 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Egypt |
671 | NM | | 0 | % | | ||||||||||||||
North Sea |
1,392 | 9 | % | 1,272 | (21 | %) | 1,618 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
International |
2,063 | 62 | % | 1,272 | (21 | %) | 1,618 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
67,050 | 7 | % | 62,541 | 51 | % | 41,403 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
BOE per day (3) |
||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
291,027 | (12 | %) | 331,709 | 7 | % | 310,000 | |||||||||||||
Canada |
77,569 | (28 | %) | 107,332 | (12 | %) | 122,201 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
North America |
368,596 | (16 | %) | 439,041 | 2 | % | 432,201 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Egypt (2) |
150,298 | 1 | % | 148,970 | (6 | %) | 158,713 | |||||||||||||
Australia |
56,193 | (1 | %) | 56,568 | (12 | %) | 64,552 | |||||||||||||
North Sea |
71,419 | (3 | %) | 73,487 | (2 | %) | 74,887 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
International |
277,910 | 0 | % | 279,025 | (6 | %) | 298,152 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
646,506 | (10 | %) | 718,066 | (2 | %) | 730,353 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Discontinued OperationsArgentina |
||||||||||||||||||||
Oil (b/d) |
1,698 | 9,375 | 9,741 | |||||||||||||||||
Gas (Mcf/d) |
34,854 | 187,390 | 213,464 | |||||||||||||||||
NGL (b/d) |
317 | 2,102 | 3,008 | |||||||||||||||||
BOE/d |
7,824 | 42,709 | 48,326 |
(1) | Gross oil production and gross natural gas production in Egypt for 2014, 2013, and 2012 were as follows: |
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
Oil (b/d) |
197,366 | 197,622 | 213,112 | |||||||||
Gas (Mcf/d) |
894,802 | 912,478 | 899,972 | |||||||||
NGL (b/d) |
1,901 | | |
38
(2) | Includes 2014 and 2013 production volumes per day attributable to a noncontrolling interest in Egypt of: |
Oil (b/d) |
29,292 | 3,875 | ||||||||
Gas (Mcf/d) |
123,511 | 16,278 | ||||||||
NGL (b/d) |
224 | |
(3) | The table shows production on a barrel of oil equivalent basis (boe) in which natural gas is converted to an equivalent barrel of oil based on a 6:1 energy equivalent ratio. This ratio is not reflective of the price ratio between the two products. |
NMNot meaningful
Pricing
The following table presents pricing information by region:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
Increase
(Decrease) |
2013 |
Increase
(Decrease) |
2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Average Oil PricePer barrel |
||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 87.33 | (11 | %) | $ | 98.14 | 3 | % | $ | 94.98 | ||||||||||
Canada |
83.57 | (4 | %) | 87.00 | 2 | % | 84.89 | |||||||||||||
North America |
86.89 | (10 | %) | 96.94 | 3 | % | 93.91 | |||||||||||||
Egypt |
97.44 | (10 | %) | 107.94 | (3 | %) | 110.92 | |||||||||||||
Australia |
94.99 | (14 | %) | 110.42 | (4 | %) | 115.22 | |||||||||||||
North Sea |
95.53 | (11 | %) | 107.48 | (0 | %) | 107.97 | |||||||||||||
International |
96.46 | (11 | %) | 108.04 | (2 | %) | 110.59 | |||||||||||||
Total (1) |
91.94 | (10 | %) | 102.62 | (1 | %) | 103.29 | |||||||||||||
Average Natural Gas PricePer Mcf: |
||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 4.33 | 13 | % | $ | 3.84 | 3 | % | $ | 3.74 | ||||||||||
Canada |
4.07 | 26 | % | 3.23 | (6 | %) | 3.42 | |||||||||||||
North America |
4.24 | 17 | % | 3.61 | | 3.61 | ||||||||||||||
Egypt |
2.96 | (1 | %) | 2.99 | (23 | %) | 3.90 | |||||||||||||
Australia |
4.43 | | 4.43 | (3 | %) | 4.55 | ||||||||||||||
North Sea |
8.29 | (21 | %) | 10.43 | 17 | % | 8.95 | |||||||||||||
International |
3.92 | (4 | %) | 4.10 | (11 | %) | 4.59 | |||||||||||||
Total (2) |
4.11 | 9 | % | 3.77 | (3 | %) | 3.90 | |||||||||||||
Average NGL PricePer barrel |
||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 25.57 | (6 | %) | $ | 27.29 | (15 | %) | $ | 32.19 | ||||||||||
Canada |
33.61 | 10 | % | 30.50 | (12 | %) | 34.63 | |||||||||||||
North America |
26.33 | (5 | %) | 27.64 | (15 | %) | 32.57 | |||||||||||||
Egypt |
51.80 | NM | | 0 | % | | ||||||||||||||
North Sea |
59.42 | (19 | %) | 73.06 | (5 | %) | 77.11 | |||||||||||||
International |
56.94 | (22 | %) | 73.06 | (5 | %) | 77.11 | |||||||||||||
Total |
27.28 | (4 | %) | 28.56 | (17 | %) | 34.31 | |||||||||||||
Discontinued OperationsArgentina |
||||||||||||||||||||
Oil price ($/Bbl) |
$ | 72.70 | $ | 79.05 | $ | 75.89 | ||||||||||||||
Gas price ($/Mcf) |
3.04 | 2.96 | 2.87 | |||||||||||||||||
NGL price ($/Bbl) |
24.57 | 23.64 | 21.55 |
(1) | Reflects a per-barrel decrease of $0.02, $0.37, and $1.13 in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively, from financial derivative hedging activities. |
(2) | Reflects a per-Mcf increase of $0.04 and $0.49 in 2013 and 2012, respectively, from financial derivative hedging activities. |
NMNot meaningful
39
Crude Oil Prices
A substantial portion of our oil production is sold at prevailing market prices, which fluctuate in response to many factors that are outside of the Companys control. Average realized crude oil prices for 2014 were down 10 percent compared to 2013, a direct result of the sharply lower benchmark oil prices in the fourth quarter of 2014.
Continued volatility in the commodity price environment reinforces the importance of our asset portfolio. While the market price received for natural gas varies among geographic areas, crude oil tends to trade within a tighter global range. Price movements for all types and grades of crude oil generally move in the same direction. Crude oil prices realized in 2014 averaged $91.94 per barrel; however, International Dated Brent crudes and sweet crude from the U.S. Gulf Coast continue to be priced at a premium to WTI-based prices. In 2014 we realized these premium prices on approximately 55 percent of our crude oil production. Our Egypt, Australia, and North Sea regions, which collectively comprised 53 percent of our 2014 worldwide oil production, received International Dated Brent pricing with 2014 oil realizations averaging $96.46 per barrel.
Natural Gas Prices
Natural gas, which currently has a limited global transportation system, is subject to price variances based on local supply and demand conditions. Our primary markets include North America, Egypt, Australia, and the U.K. An overview of the market conditions in our primary gas-producing regions follows:
| North America has a common market; most of our gas is sold on a monthly or daily basis at either monthly or daily market prices. Our North American regions averaged $4.24 per Mcf in 2014, up from $3.61 per Mcf in 2013. |
| In Egypt, our gas is sold to EGPC, primarily under an industry pricing formula indexed to Dated Brent crude oil with a maximum gas price of $2.65 per MMBtu, plus an upward adjustment for liquids content. Under a legacy oil-indexed contract, which expired at the end of 2012, there was no price cap for our gas up to 100 MMcf/d of gross production. Overall, the region averaged $2.96 per Mcf in 2014, down 1 percent from the prior year. |
| Australia has historically had a local market with a limited number of buyers and sellers resulting in mostly long-term, fixed-price contracts that are periodically adjusted for changes in the local consumer price index. During 2014, the region averaged $4.43 per Mcf, unchanged from 2013 pricing. |
| Natural gas from the North Sea Beryl field is processed through the SAGE gas plant operated by Apache. The gas is sold to a third party at the St. Fergus entry point of the national grid on a National Balancing Point index price basis. The region averaged $8.29 per Mcf in 2014, a 21 percent decrease from an average of $10.43 per Mcf in 2013. |
NGL Prices
Apaches NGL production is sold under contracts with prices at market indices based on local supply and demand conditions, less the costs for transportation and fractionation, or on a weighted-average sales price received by the purchaser.
Crude Oil Revenues
2014 vs. 2013 During 2014 crude oil revenues totaled $10.8 billion, approximately 15 percent lower than the 2013 total of $12.6 billion, driven by a 10 percent decrease in average oil prices and a 5 percent decrease in worldwide production. Average daily production in 2014 was 320.4 Mb/d, with prices averaging $91.94 per barrel. Crude oil represented 78 percent of our 2014 oil and gas production revenues and 50 percent of our equivalent production, compared to 79 and 47 percent, respectively, in the prior year. Lower realized prices reduced revenues $1.3 billion, while lower production volumes reduced revenues an additional $565 million.
40
Worldwide oil production from continuing operations decreased 16.8 Mb/d. However, when excluding production from the Gulf of Mexico Shelf, South Texas, and Canadian asset divestitures, oil production increased 18.2 Mb/d. This increase was driven by production growth of 20.1 Mb/d in our Permian region as a result of higher drilling and recompletion activity, partially offset by a decrease in production from the North Sea on natural decline.
2013 vs. 2012 During 2013 crude oil revenues totaled $12.6 billion, $307 million lower than the 2012 total of $12.9 billion, driven by a 1 percent decrease in worldwide production and average realized prices. Average daily production in 2013 was 337.2 Mb/d, with prices averaging $102.62 per barrel. Crude oil represented 79 percent of our 2013 oil and gas production revenues and 47 percent of our equivalent production, compared to 79 and 47 percent, respectively, in the prior year. Lower production volumes reduced revenues $224 million, while slightly lower realized prices reduced revenues an additional $83 million.
Worldwide oil production from continuing operations decreased 5.0 Mb/d, however, when excluding the Gulf of Mexico Shelf and Canadian assets that were sold during 2013, oil production increased 4.0 Mb/d, driven by growth of 23.7 Mb/d from our North American regions. Our Permian and Central regions increased production by 11.9 Mb/d and 8.6 Mb/d, respectively, as a result of higher drilling and recompletion activity. Production from our remaining property base in Canada increased 2.1 Mb/d, or 14 percent, as a result of our continued focus on liquids-rich drilling targets. These increases were partially offset by a 19.7 Mb/d decrease in production from our international regions. Oil production from Egypt decreased 10.2 Mb/d, of which 7.8 Mb/d was related production used to pay taxes and, under the terms of our production sharing contracts, has no economic impact to Apache. Australias production decreased 9.6 Mb/d as a result of natural decline from our Pyrenees and Van Gogh fields.
Natural Gas Revenues
2014 vs. 2013 Natural gas revenues of $2.3 billion for 2014 were $298 million lower than 2013, the result of a 19 percent decrease in production volumes offset by a 9 percent increase in realized prices. Worldwide production decreased 355.4 MMcf/d, lowering revenues by $533 million. Realized prices in 2014 averaged $4.11 per Mcf, an increase of $0.34 per Mcf compared to 2013, which increased revenues by $235 million.
Worldwide gas production from continuing operations decreased 19 percent. However, excluding production from the Gulf of Mexico Shelf, South Texas, and Canadian asset divestitures, gas production increased 4.7 MMcf/d. This increase was driven by production growth of 28.0 MMcf/d in the Permian region as a result of higher drilling and recompletion activity. Egypts net production increased 13.8 MMcf/d as a result of our successful drilling program with new wells coming on-line during 2014, and production from the North Sea increased 5 MMcf/d on stronger than expected well performance. Offsetting this increase were production decreases of 20 MMcf/d from our remaining properties in Canada, a result of a shift in our drilling and recompletion activity from dry gas to liquids-rich gas properties and 9.5 MMcf/d in Australia as a result of lower customer takes under existing contractual arrangements.
2013 vs. 2012 Natural gas revenues of $2.6 billion for 2013 were $342 million lower than 2012, the result of a 8 percent decrease in production volumes and a 3 percent decrease in realized prices. Worldwide production decreased 170.3 MMcf/d, lowering revenues by $242 million. Realized prices in 2013 averaged $3.77 per Mcf, a decrease of $0.13 per Mcf from 2012, which reduced revenues by an additional $100 million.
Worldwide gas production from continuing operations decreased 8 percent; however, excluding production from the Gulf of Mexico Shelf and Canadian assets sold during 2013, gas production declined only 2 percent, or 34 MMcf/d. Production declined 66 MMcf/d from our remaining properties in Canada, a result of a shift in our drilling and recompletion activity from dry gas to liquids-rich gas properties. Production from our U.S. Deepwater region decreased 26 MMcf/d on natural decline. These decreases were partially offset by production increases of 52.6 MMcf/d in our U.S. onshore regions resulting from drilling activity focusing on liquids-rich targets, 9.4 MMcf/d in Australia on volumes from our Macedon field discovery, which commenced operations in the third quarter, and 2.7 MMcf/d in Egypt.
41
NGL Revenues
2014 vs. 2013 NGL revenues totaled $668 million in 2014, an increase of $16 million from 2013, the result of a 7 percent increase in production volumes partially offset by a 4 percent decrease in realized prices. Worldwide production from continuing operations rose 4.5 Mb/d, adding $45 million to revenues. This increase was primarily driven by drilling and recompletion activity in the U.S. Permian region. Realized prices in 2014 averaged $27.28 per Mcf barrel, a decrease of $1.28 per barrel, which reduced revenues by $29 million.
2013 vs. 2012 NGL revenues totaled $652 million in 2013, an increase of $132 million from 2012, the result of a 51 percent increase in production volumes partially offset by a 17 percent decrease in realized prices. Worldwide production from continuing operations rose 21.1 Mb/d, adding $219 million to revenues. This increase was primarily driven by drilling and recompletion activity in the U.S. Central and Permian regions. Realized prices in 2013 averaged $28.56 per Mcf barrel, a decrease of $5.75 per barrel, which reduced revenues by $87 million.
Operating Expenses
The table below presents a comparison of our expenses on an absolute dollar basis and an equivalent unit of production (boe) basis. Our discussion may reference expenses on a boe basis, on an absolute dollar basis or both, depending on context. All 2014 and 2013 operating expenses include costs attributable to a noncontrolling interest in Egypt. Operating expenses for all periods exclude discontinued operations in Argentina.
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | (Per boe) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas property and equipment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recurring |
$ | 4,747 | $ | 4,894 | $ | 4,593 | $ | 20.11 | $ | 18.67 | $ | 17.18 | ||||||||||||
Additional |
5,001 | 995 | 1,926 | 21.19 | 3.80 | 7.21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
410 | 400 | 362 | 1.74 | 1.53 | 1.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
181 | 238 | 228 | 0.77 | 0.91 | 0.85 | ||||||||||||||||||
Lease operating costs |
2,479 | 2,864 | 2,784 | 10.51 | 10.93 | 10.41 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gathering and transportation costs |
273 | 288 | 295 | 1.17 | 1.07 | 1.12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Taxes other than income |
678 | 785 | 818 | 2.87 | 3.00 | 3.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairments |
2,357 | | | 9.99 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
434 | 482 | 515 | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1.92 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, divestiture, and separation costs |
67 | 33 | 31 | 0.28 | 0.12 | 0.12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financing costs, net |
130 | 177 | 172 | 0.55 | 0.68 | 0.64 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 16,757 | $ | 11,156 | $ | 11,724 | $ | 71.02 | $ | 42.55 | $ | 43.86 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (DD&A)
The following table details the changes in recurring DD&A of oil and gas properties from 2012 to 2014:
Recurring DD&A | ||||
(In millions) | ||||
2012 DD&A |
$ | 4,593 | ||
Volume change |
(57 | ) | ||
DD&A Rate change |
358 | |||
|
|
|||
2013 DD&A |
$ | 4,894 | ||
Volume change |
(414 | ) | ||
DD&A Rate change |
267 | |||
|
|
|||
2014 DD&A |
$ | 4,747 | ||
|
|
42
2014 vs. 2013 Recurring full-cost depletion expense decreased $147 million on an absolute dollar basis: $414 million on lower volumes partially offset by an increase of $267 million from a higher average cost rate per boe. Our full-cost depletion rate increased $1.44 to $20.11 per boe reflecting increased cost for exploration and development activity over the past several years.
2013 vs. 2012 Recurring full-cost depletion expense increased $301 million on an absolute dollar basis: $358 million on rate partially offset by a decrease of $57 million from lower volumes. Our full-cost depletion rate increased $1.49 to $18.67 per boe reflecting acquisition and drilling costs that exceed our historical levels.
Additional DD&A
Under the full-cost method of accounting, the Company is required to review the carrying value of its proved oil and gas properties each quarter on a country-by-country basis. Under these rules, capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, net of accumulated DD&A and deferred income taxes, may not exceed the present value of estimated future net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves, net of related tax effects and discounted 10 percent per annum and adjusted for cash flow hedges. Estimated future net cash flows are calculated using end-of-period costs and an unweighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect on the first day of each of the previous 12 months, held flat for the life of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements.
During 2014, we recorded $4.4 billion ($2.8 billion net of tax) and $589 million ($224 million net of tax) in non-cash write-downs of the carrying value of the Companys U.S. and North Sea proved oil and gas properties, respectively. If oil prices do not recover significantly from the current futures market price indication, the Company expects further write-downs of the carrying value of its oil and gas properties, which may be material to the Companys consolidated financial statements, throughout the remainder of 2015.
In 2013 we recorded non-cash write-downs of the carrying value of the Companys proved oil and gas properties totaling $995 million. The after-tax impact of these write-downs was $356 million in the U.S. and $139 million in the North Sea. During the year, the Company also exited operations in Kenya and recorded $46 million net of tax to additional DD&A related to the impairment of the carrying value of the Kenyan oil and gas property leases.
In 2012 we recorded a non-cash write-down on the carrying value of our proved oil and gas property balances in Canada of $1.9 billion ($1.4 billion net of tax). The Company also recorded $28 million of additional DD&A related to the write-off of the carrying value of our oil and gas properties in New Zealand upon exiting the country and $15 million of seismic costs incurred in countries where Apache is pursuing exploration opportunities but has not yet established a presence.
Lease Operating Expenses
Lease operating expenses (LOE) include several key components, such as direct operating costs, repair and maintenance, and workover costs.
Direct operating costs generally trend with commodity prices and are impacted by the type of commodity produced and the location of properties (i.e., offshore, onshore, remote locations, etc.). Fluctuations in commodity prices impact operating cost elements both directly and indirectly. They directly impact costs such as power, fuel, and chemicals, which are commodity price based. Commodity prices also affect industry activity and demand, thus indirectly impacting the cost of items such as rig rates, labor, boats, helicopters, materials, and supplies. Oil, which contributed nearly half of our 2014 production, is inherently more expensive to produce than natural gas. Repair and maintenance costs are typically higher on offshore properties.
43
The following table identifies changes in Apaches LOE rate from 2012 to 2014:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
|||||||||
Per boe | Per boe | |||||||||
2013 LOE |
$ | 10.93 | 2012 LOE | $ | 10.41 | |||||
Divestitures (1) |
(0.68 | ) |
Divestitures (1) |
(0.11 | ) | |||||
FX impact |
(0.12 | ) |
Power and fuel costs |
0.21 | ||||||
Labor and overhead costs |
0.20 |
Labor and overhead costs |
0.16 | |||||||
Transportation |
0.14 |
Non-operated property costs |
0.14 | |||||||
Equipment rental |
0.12 |
Transportation |
0.14 | |||||||
Workover costs |
0.12 |
Workover costs |
0.08 | |||||||
Materials |
0.12 |
Repairs and maintenance |
0.08 | |||||||
Saltwater disposal |
0.09 |
Other |
0.08 | |||||||
Other |
0.31 |
Other increased production |
(0.26 | ) | ||||||
Other increased production |
(0.72 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
2014 LOE |
$ | 10.51 | 2013 LOE | $ | 10.93 | |||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Per-unit impact of divestitures is shown net of associated production. |
Gathering and Transportation
We generally sell oil and natural gas under two common types of agreements, both of which include a transportation charge. One is a netback arrangement, under which we sell oil or natural gas at the wellhead and collect a lower relative price to reflect transportation costs to be incurred by the purchaser. In this case, we record sales at the netback price received from the purchaser. Alternatively, we sell oil or natural gas at a specific delivery point, pay our own transportation to a third-party carrier, and receive a price with no transportation deduction. In this case, we record the separate transportation cost as gathering and transportation costs.
In the U.S. and Canada we sell oil and natural gas under both types of arrangements. In the North Sea, we pay transportation charges to a third-party carrier. In Australia, oil and natural gas are sold under netback arrangements. In Egypt, our oil and natural gas production is primarily sold to EGPC under netback arrangements; however, we also export crude oil under both types of arrangements.
The following table presents gathering and transportation costs we paid directly to third-party carriers for each of the periods presented:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Canada |
$ | 123 | $ | 155 | $ | 163 | ||||||
U.S. |
93 | 84 | 69 | |||||||||
Egypt |
40 | 42 | 39 | |||||||||
North Sea |
17 | 7 | 24 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Gathering and transportation |
$ | 273 | $ | 288 | $ | 295 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 vs. 2013 Gathering and transportation costs decreased $15 million from 2013. Canadas 2014 costs decreased $32 million from a decline in production primarily associated with divestitures. The U.S. costs for 2014 increased $9 million as compared to 2013 primarily as a result of increased production in the Central and Permian regions from increased drilling activity partially offset by a decrease from the Gulf of Mexico asset sales. Egypt costs were down $2 million from decreases in the world scale freight rates. North Sea costs increased $10 million on increased NGL activity and oil transportation tariffs.
44
2013 vs. 2012 Gathering and transportation costs decreased $7 million from 2012. The U.S. costs for 2013 increased $15 million as compared to 2012 primarily as a result of increased production in the Permian and Central region from increased drilling activity. Egypt costs were up $3 million from increases in the world scale freight rates. North Sea costs decreased $17 million. Canadas costs decreased $8 million from a decline in activity.
Taxes Other Than Income
Taxes other than income primarily consist of U.K. Petroleum Revenue Tax (PRT), Australian Petroleum Resource Rent Tax (PRRT), severance taxes on properties onshore and in state or provincial waters off the coast of the U.S. and Australia, and ad valorem taxes on properties in the U.S. and Canada. Severance taxes are generally based on a percentage of oil and gas production revenues, while the U.K. PRT is assessed on net receipts from qualifying fields in the U.K. North Sea. Australian PRRT expense is a levy assessed on the sale of hydrocarbons derived from specific developmental areas in Australia. We are subject to a variety of other taxes including U.S. franchise taxes and various Canadian taxes, including the Freehold Mineral tax and Saskatchewan Resources surtax. The table below presents a comparison of these expenses:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Australia PRRT and U.K. PRT |
$ | 273 | $ | 382 | $ | 451 | ||||||
Severance taxes |
261 | 249 | 215 | |||||||||
Ad valorem taxes |
104 | 113 | 103 | |||||||||
Other |
40 | 41 | 49 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Taxes other than income |
$ | 678 | $ | 785 | $ | 818 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 vs. 2013 Taxes other than income were $107 million lower than 2013. Australian PRRT and U.K. PRT decreased $109 million over the comparable 2013 period based on a decrease in production revenues in the North Sea from qualifying fields during the year partially offset by $96 million Australian PRRT accrued during 2014. Prior periods reflect no Australian PRRT expense as sales subject to PRRT were fully offset by credits derived from exploration and development expenditures. Severance tax increased $12 million with increased production from the Permian region offset by higher tax credits and decreased oil prices. Ad valorem taxes decreased $9 million as a result of property divestitures during 2014.
2013 vs. 2012 Taxes other than income were $33 million lower than 2012. U.K. PRT decreased $69 million over the comparable 2012 period based on a decrease in production revenues from qualifying fields during the year. Prior-year property acquisitions and higher drilling activity resulted in increases of $34 million and $10 million to severance and ad valorem tax expense, respectively.
Impairments
During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company recorded asset impairments totaling $2.4 billion, including $1.3 billion for the impairment of goodwill, $1.0 billion for the impairment of assets held for sale, and other asset impairments. For detailed information regarding impairments, please refer to Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 2Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.
General and Administrative Expenses
2014 vs. 2013 General and administrative (G&A) expenses decreased $48 million, or 10 percent, from 2013. On a per-unit basis, G&A expenses stayed flat compared to prior year as a result of lower costs offset by lower production from recent divestitures. Expenses for 2014 included a $25 million benefit from nonrecurring third party cost reimbursements in Australia.
45
2013 vs. 2012 General and administrative (G&A) expenses decreased $33 million, or 6 percent, from 2012. On a per-unit basis, G&A expenses were down $0.08 to $1.84 per boe, with the benefit of lower costs partially offset by the impact of lower production.
Acquisition, Divestiture and Separation Costs
Apache recorded $67 million and $33 million of expenses during 2014 and 2013, respectively, primarily related to separation costs, investment banking fees and other costs associated with recent divestitures. In 2012, the Company recorded $31 million of expenses reflecting costs related to our acquisition of Mobil North Sea and our acquisition of Cordillera.
Financing Costs, Net
Financing costs incurred during the period comprised the following:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 499 | $ | 560 | $ | 501 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred loan costs |
6 | 8 | 7 | |||||||||
Capitalized interest |
(363 | ) | (364 | ) | (323 | ) | ||||||
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
| (16 | ) | | ||||||||
Interest income |
(12 | ) | (11 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Financing costs, net |
$ | 130 | $ | 177 | $ | 172 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 vs. 2013 Net financing costs decreased $47 million from 2013. The decrease is primarily related to a $61 million decrease in interest expense as a result of lower average debt balances during 2014.
2013 vs. 2012 Net financing costs increased $5 million from 2012. The increase is primarily related to a $59 million increase in interest expense from debt issuances during 2012, partially offset by a $41 million increase in capitalized interest resulting from additional unproved property balances in the Central and Permian regions. Additionally, Apache realized a gain of $16 million related to debt extinguished during 2013.
Provision for Income Taxes
In 2014, Apache evaluated its permanent reinvestment position and determined that undistributed earnings from certain subsidiaries located in Apaches Australia, Egypt, and North Sea regions will no longer be permanently reinvested. As a result of this change in position, the Company recorded $1.7 billion of U.S. deferred income tax expense on the undistributed earnings that were previously considered permanently reinvested. In addition, the Company recorded $311 million of U.S. deferred income tax expense on foreign earnings that were distributed to the U.S. in 2014.
The 2014 provision for income taxes totaled $1.6 billion. The 2014 effective rate reflects the tax benefit from the $5.0 billion non-cash write-down in the U.S. and North Sea. The Companys rate is also impacted by the $1.7 billion of deferred income tax expense recorded in 2014 for changing our position on unremitted earnings on foreign subsidiaries and $311 million of deferred income tax expense on distributed foreign earnings. In addition, the Company had approximately $2.1 billion of impairments related to non-cash write-downs of goodwill and assets held for sale. Excluding these items and certain other adjustments, the 2014 effective tax rate would have been 41 percent.
The 2013 provision for income taxes totaled $1.9 billion. The 2013 effective rate reflects the tax benefit from the $995 million non-cash write-downs in the U.S., North Sea, and Kenya, impacts from foreign currency fluctuations and a $225 million charge related to distributed foreign earnings and other adjustments. Excluding these items, the 2013 effective tax rate would have been 42 percent.
46
For additional information regarding income taxes, please refer to Note 7Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Operating cash flows are the Companys primary source of liquidity. We may also elect to utilize available committed borrowing capacity, access to both debt and equity capital markets, or proceeds from the sale of nonstrategic assets for all other liquidity and capital resource needs.
Apaches operating cash flows, both in the short-term and the long-term, are impacted by highly volatile oil and natural gas prices. Significant deterioration in commodity prices negatively impacts our revenues, earnings and cash flows, and potentially our liquidity if spending does not trend downward as well. Sales volumes and costs also impact cash flows; however, these historically have not been as volatile and have less impact than commodity prices in the short-term.
Apaches long-term operating cash flows are dependent on reserve replacement and the level of costs required for ongoing operations. Cash investments are required to fund activity necessary to offset the inherent declines in production and proved crude oil and natural gas reserves. Future success in maintaining and growing reserves and production is highly dependent on the success of our drilling program and our ability to add reserves at reasonable costs.
We have initially set our 2015 capital budget at $3.8 billion, which is approximately 60 percent lower than the prior year as a result of our response to the changing market conditions and operating cash flow forecasts. This budget covers planned expenditures for drilling, completions, recompletion projects, equipment upgrades, expansion of existing facilities and equipment, plugging and abandonment, seismic studies, and leasing additional acreage. We closely monitor commodity prices, service cost levels, regulatory impacts, and numerous other industry factors and routinely adjust our budgets in response to changing market conditions and operating cash flow forecasts. With the current capital program, we are projecting our production to be relatively flat compared to 2014, when adjusting for divested assets.
We believe the liquidity and capital resource alternatives available to Apache, combined with proactive measures to adjust our capital budget to reflect lower oil prices and anticipated operating cash flows, will be adequate to fund short-term and long-term operations, including our capital spending program, repayment of debt maturities, and any amount that may ultimately be paid in connection with commitments and contingencies.
For additional information, please see Part I, Items 1 and 2Business and Properties and Part I, Item 1ARisk Factors of this Form 10-K.
47
Sources and Uses of Cash
The following table presents the sources and uses of our cash and cash equivalents for the years presented:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Sources of Cash and Cash Equivalents: |
||||||||||||
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities |
$ | 8,379 | $ | 9,603 | $ | 8,281 | ||||||
Net cash provided by Argentina discontinued operations |
788 | 18 | | |||||||||
Proceeds from asset divestitures |
3,092 | 4,405 | 27 | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of Egypt noncontrolling interest |
| 2,948 | | |||||||||
Commercial paper and bank loan borrowings, net |
1,568 | | 511 | |||||||||
Fixed-rate debt borrowings |
| | 4,978 | |||||||||
Other |
49 | 21 | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
13,876 | 16,995 | 13,797 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Uses of Cash and Cash Equivalents: |
||||||||||||
Capital expenditures (1) |
$ | 10,880 | $ | 10,802 | $ | 8,161 | ||||||
Leasehold and property acquisitions |
1,492 | 419 | 3,969 | |||||||||
Shares repurchased |
1,864 | 997 | | |||||||||
Dividends paid |
365 | 360 | 332 | |||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
140 | | | |||||||||
Equity investment in Yara Pilbara Holdings Pty Limited (YPHPL) |
| | 439 | |||||||||
Commercial paper, credit facility and bank loan repayments, net |
| 509 | | |||||||||
Payments on fixed-rate debt |
| 2,072 | 400 | |||||||||
Net cash used by Argentina operations |
| | 66 | |||||||||
Other |
272 | 90 | 565 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
15,013 | 15,249 | 13,932 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (1,137 | ) | $ | 1,746 | $ | (135 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | The table presents capital expenditures on a cash basis; therefore, the amounts differ from those discussed elsewhere in this document, which include accruals. |
Net Cash Provided by Continuing Operating Activities
Operating cash flows are our primary source of capital and liquidity and are impacted, both in the short-term and the long-term, by volatile oil and natural gas prices. The factors that determine operating cash flows are largely the same as those that affect net earnings, with the exception of non-cash expenses such as DD&A, asset retirement obligation (ARO) accretion, and deferred income tax expense, which affect earnings but do not affect cash flows.
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities for 2014 totaled $8.4 billion, down $1.2 billion from 2013. The decrease reflects comparative changes in working capital during the periods.
For a detailed discussion of commodity prices, production, and expenses, please see Results of Operations in this Item 7. For additional detail on the changes in operating assets and liabilities and the non-cash expenses which do not impact net cash provided by operating activities, please see the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows in the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.
48
Argentina Discontinued Operations
During 2014, Apache completed the sale of our Argentina operations and properties to YPF Sociedad Anónima for cash proceeds of $786 million. The results of operations related to Argentina have been classified as discontinued operations in all periods presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Net cash provided by Argentina discontinued operations for the first quarter of 2014 was $2 million.
Asset Divestitures
During 2014, Apache completed the sale of non-core Anadarko basin and southern Louisiana oil and gas assets for $1.3 billion. In addition, Apache completed the sale of non-operated interests in the Lucius and Heidelberg development projects and 11 primary term deepwater exploration blocks in the Gulf of Mexico for $1.4 billion. The effective dates of these transactions were October 1, 2014 and May 1, 2014, respectively. Proceeds from the sale of other oil and gas properties totaled $470 million during the year.
During 2013, Apache completed the sale of Gulf of Mexico Shelf operations and properties for $3.7 billion. In addition, Apache completed a transaction with Chevron Canada under which each company became a 50 percent owner of the Kitimat LNG plant, the PTP, and 644,000 gross undeveloped acres in the Horn River and Liard basins. The proceeds from this transaction were $396 million. Proceeds from the sale of other oil and gas properties totaled $306 million during the year.
For information regarding our acquisitions and divestitures, please see Note 2Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.
Egypt Noncontrolling Interest
During 2013, Apache completed the sale of a one-third minority participation in its Egypt oil and gas business to Sinopec for $2.95 billion. Apache made cash distributions totaling $140 million to Sinopec in 2014.
Capital Expenditures
During 2014, capital spending for E&D activities totaled $9.7 billion compared to $9.6 billion in the prior year period. Apaches E&D capital spending was primarily focused on our North American onshore assets. In the Permian region we averaged 40 operated drilling rigs during the year. In our Gulf Coast region, during 2014 we increased activity on our Eagle Ford acreage in Texas.
Apache also completed leasehold and property acquisitions totaling $1.5 billion during 2014, compared with $419 million in 2013. Our 2014 acquisition investments focused on adding new leasehold positions to our North American onshore portfolio.
Apaches investment in gas gathering, transmission, and processing facilities totaled $1.2 billion during each of 2014 and 2013. Apaches 2014 GTP capital expenditures were primarily for the Wheatstone and Kitimat LNG facilities. In December of 2014, Apache announced an agreement to sell its interest in the two LNG projects. Apache will be reimbursed for its net expenditure in the projects between June 30, 2014, and closing, which is estimated to be approximately $1 billion. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2015. For more information, please see Note 2Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.
Shares Repurchased
Apaches Board of Directors has authorized the purchase of up to 40 million shares of the Companys common stock. Shares may be purchased either in the open market or through privately held negotiated transactions. The Company initiated the buyback program on June 10, 2013, and since the inception of the
49
program has repurchased a total of 32.2 million shares at an average price of $88.96. During 2014, 21.0 million shares were repurchased at an average price of $89.00. The Company is not obligated to acquire any specific number of shares.
Dividends
The Company has paid cash dividends on its common stock for 50 consecutive years through 2014. Future dividend payments will depend on the Companys level of earnings, financial requirements, and other relevant factors. Common stock dividends paid during 2014 totaled $365 million, compared with $303 million in 2013 and $256 million in 2012. The Company paid dividends on its Series D Preferred Stock totaling $57 million and $76 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively. The preferred stock was converted to common stock in August 2013.
In the first quarter of 2014 the Board of Directors approved a 25 percent increase to $0.25 per share for the regular quarterly cash dividend on the Companys common shares. This increase first applied to the dividend on common shares payable on May 22, 2014, to stockholders of record on April 22, 2014, and subsequent dividends paid.
Liquidity
At December 31, | ||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
(In millions, except percentages) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 769 | $ | 1,906 | ||||
Total debt |
11,245 | 9,725 | ||||||
Equity |
28,137 | 35,393 | ||||||
Available committed borrowing capacity |
3,730 | 3,300 | ||||||
Floating-rate debt/total debt |
14 | % | 1 | % | ||||
Percent of total debt-to-capitalization |
29 | % | 22 | % |
Cash and Cash Equivalents
At December 31, 2014, we had $769 million in cash and cash equivalents, of which $498 million of cash was held by foreign subsidiaries, and approximately $271 million was held by Apache Corporation and U.S. subsidiaries. The cash held by foreign subsidiaries is subject to additional U.S. income taxes if repatriated. The majority of the cash is invested in highly liquid, investment-grade securities with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase.
Debt
At December 31, 2014, outstanding debt, which consisted of notes, debentures, and commercial paper, totaled $11.2 billion. We have $900 million of debt maturing in 2017, $2.1 billion maturing in 2018, and the remaining $8.2 billion maturing in years 2019 through 2096. At December 31, 2014, we had no current debt outstanding.
Available Credit Facilities
As of December 31, 2014, the Company had unsecured committed revolving syndicated bank credit facilities totaling $5.3 billion, of which $2.0 billion matures in December 2015, $1.0 billion matures in August 2016 and $2.3 billion matures in June 2018 pursuant to a one-year extension approved in May 2014 under the terms of the $2.3 billion facilities. In December 2014, the company entered into a $2.0 billion 364-day revolving credit facility which matures in December 2015. At maturity, the 364-day credit facility allows the Company to convert the outstanding revolving loans into one-year term loans by paying a term-out fee of 1 percent. Proceeds from borrowings may be used for general corporate purposes. Apaches available borrowing capacity under this
50
facility and its other committed credit facilities support its commercial paper program, which was increased from $3.0 billion to $5.0 billion in December 2014. The facilities consist of the $2.0 billion 364-day credit facility, a $1.7 billion facility and a $1.0 billion facility in the U.S., a $300 million facility in Australia, and a $300 million facility in Canada. As of December 31, 2014, aggregate available borrowing capacity under the Companys credit facilities was $3.7 billion.
At the Companys option, the interest rate for the facilities is based on a base rate, as defined, or the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin determined by the Companys senior long-term debt rating. The $1.7 billion credit facility also allows the Company to borrow under competitive auctions.
At December 31, 2014, the margin over LIBOR for committed loans was 0.925 percent on the $2.0 billion 364-day credit facility, 0.875 percent on the $1.0 billion U.S. credit facility, and 0.90 percent on each of the $1.7 billion U.S. credit facility, the $300 million Australian credit facility, and the $300 million Canadian credit facility. The Company also pays quarterly facility fees of 0.075 percent on the total amount of the $2.0 billion 364-day credit facility, 0.125 percent on the total amount of the $1.0 billion facility, and 0.10 percent on the total amount of the other three facilities. The margin over LIBOR and the facility fees vary based upon the Companys senior long-term debt rating.
The financial covenants of the credit facilities require the Company to maintain a debt-to-capitalization ratio of not greater than 60 percent at the end of any fiscal quarter. At December 31, 2014, the Companys debt-to-capitalization ratio was 29 percent.
The negative covenants include restrictions on the Companys ability to create liens and security interests on its assets, with exceptions for liens typically arising in the oil and gas industry, purchase money liens, and liens arising as a matter of law, such as tax and mechanics liens. The Company may incur liens on assets located in the U.S. and Canada of up to 5 percent of the Companys consolidated assets, or approximately $2.8 billion as of December 31, 2014. There are no restrictions on incurring liens in countries other than the U.S. and Canada. There are also restrictions on Apaches ability to merge with another entity, unless the Company is the surviving entity, and a restriction on its ability to guarantee debt of entities not within its consolidated group.
There are no clauses in the facilities that permit the lenders to accelerate payments or refuse to lend based on unspecified material adverse changes. The credit facility agreements do not have drawdown restrictions or prepayment obligations in the event of a decline in credit ratings. However, the agreements allow the lenders to accelerate payments and terminate lending commitments if Apache Corporation, or any of its U.S. or Canadian subsidiaries, defaults on any direct payment obligation in excess of the stated thresholds noted in the agreements or has any unpaid, non-appealable judgment against it in excess of the stated thresholds noted in the agreements. The Company was in compliance with the terms of the credit facilities as of December 31, 2014.
There is no assurance that the financial condition of banks with lending commitments to the Company will not deteriorate. We closely monitor the ratings of the 25 banks in our bank group. Having a large bank group allows the Company to mitigate the potential impact of any banks failure to honor its lending commitment.
Commercial Paper Program
In December 2014, the Company increased its commercial paper program from $3.0 billion to $5.0 billion. The commercial paper program generally enables Apache to borrow funds for up to 270 days at competitive interest rates. The commercial paper program is fully supported by available borrowing capacity under committed credit facilities. Our 2014 weighted-average interest rate for commercial paper was 0.31 percent. If the Company is unable to issue commercial paper following a significant credit downgrade or dislocation in the market, the Companys committed credit facilities, which expire in 2015, 2016, and 2018, are available as a 100 percent backstop. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had $1.6 billion in commercial paper outstanding. At December 31, 2013, the Company had no commercial paper outstanding.
51
Letter of Credit Collateral
Apache assumed abandonment obligations in conjunction with various North Sea acquisitions. Although not currently required, to ensure Apaches payment of these costs, Apache agreed to deliver a letter of credit to the applicable seller if the rating of Apaches senior unsecured debt is lowered by both Moodys and Standard and Poors to ratings specified in the agreement with such seller. Apache has made arrangements with members of its bank group to provide letters of credit to cover certain abandonment obligations, if needed.
Total Debt-to-Capitalization
The Companys debt-to-capitalization ratio as of December 31, 2014, was 29 percent as compared to 22 percent at December 31, 2013. The increase in our debt-to-capitalization ratio is directly related to the draw on commercial paper during 2014 and the current year non-cash earnings charges for oil and gas property write-downs and asset impairments.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Apache enters into customary agreements in the oil and gas industry for drilling rig commitments, firm transportation agreements, and other obligations as described below in Contractual Obligations in this Item 7. Other than the off-balance sheet arrangements described herein, Apache does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities that are reasonably likely to materially affect our liquidity or capital resource positions.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the Companys contractual obligations as of December 31, 2014. For additional information regarding these obligations, please see Note 6Debt and Note 8Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.
Contractual Obligations (1) |
Note
Reference |
Total | 2015 | 2016-2017 | 2018-2019 |
2020 &
Beyond |
||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt, at face value |
Note 6 | $ | 11,301 | $ | | $ | 901 | $ | 2,270 | $ | 8,130 | |||||||||||||
Interest payments |
Note 6 | 9,751 | 482 | 947 | 851 | 7,471 | ||||||||||||||||||
Drilling rig commitments (2) |
Note 8 | 999 | 382 | 573 | 44 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations (3) |
Note 8 | 1,248 | 527 | 428 | 255 | 38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Firm transportation agreements (4) |
Note 8 | 431 | 101 | 173 | 85 | 72 | ||||||||||||||||||
Office and related equipment |
Note 8 | 343 | 49 | 98 | 80 | 116 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other operating lease obligations (5) |
Note 8 | 469 | 131 | 221 | 82 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Contractual Obligations |
$ | 24,542 | $ | 1,672 | $ | 3,341 | $ | 3,667 | $ | 15,862 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | This table does not include the Companys liability for dismantlement, abandonment, and restoration costs of oil and gas properties or pension or postretirement benefit obligations. For additional information regarding these liabilities, please see Notes 5 and 9, respectively, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K. |
(2) | This represents minimum future expenditures for drilling rig services. Apaches expenditures for drilling rig services will exceed such minimum amounts to the extent Apache utilizes the drilling rigs subject to a particular contractual commitment for a period greater than the period set forth in the governing contract. Drilling rig commitments will be reduced by $79 million upon the completion of the sale of Apaches interest in the Kitimat and Wheatstone LNG projects. |
(3) |
Purchase obligations represent agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable, are legally binding, and specify all significant terms, including fixed and minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, |
52
minimum or variable price provisions; and the appropriate timing of the transaction. These include minimum commitments associated with take-or-pay contracts, NGL processing agreements, obtaining and processing seismic data, and contractual obligations to buy or build oil and gas plants and facilities, including LNG facilities. Of the total purchase obligations, $651 million will be relinquished upon completion of the sale of Apaches interest in the Kitimat and Wheatstone LNG projects. |
(4) | Firm transportation commitments will be reduced by $51 million upon completion of the sale of Apaches interest in the Kitimat and Wheatstone LNG projects. |
(5) | Other operating lease obligations pertain to other long-term exploration, development, and production activities. The Company has work-related commitments for oil and gas operations equipment, acreage maintenance commitments, and FPSOs, among other things. Other operating lease commitments will be reduced by $291 million upon the completion of the sale of Apaches interest in the Kitimat and Wheatstone LNG projects. |
Apache is also subject to various contingent obligations that become payable only if certain events or rulings were to occur. The inherent uncertainty surrounding the timing of and monetary impact associated with these events or rulings prevents any meaningful accurate measurement, which is necessary to assess settlements resulting from litigation. Apaches management feels that it has adequately reserved for its contingent obligations, including approximately $67 million for environmental remediation and approximately $8 million for various contingent legal liabilities. For a detailed discussion of the Companys environmental and legal contingencies, please see Note 8Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.
The Company also had approximately $52 million accrued as of December 31, 2014, for an insurance contingency as a member of Oil Insurance Limited (OIL). This insurance co-op insures specific property, pollution liability, and other catastrophic risks of the Company. As part of its membership, the Company is contractually committed to pay a withdrawal premium if we elect to withdraw from OIL. Apache does not anticipate withdrawal from the insurance pool; however, the potential withdrawal premium is calculated annually based on past losses and the nature of our asset base.
Insurance Program
We maintain insurance policies that include coverage for physical damage to our assets, third party liability, workers compensation, employers liability, sudden and accidental pollution, and other risks. Our insurance coverage includes deductibles or retentions that must be met prior to recovery. Additionally, our insurance is subject to exclusions and limitations, and there is no assurance that such coverage will adequately protect us against liability from all potential consequences and damages.
Our current insurance policies covering physical damage to our assets provide $1 billion in coverage per occurrence. These policies also provide sudden and accidental pollution coverage. Coverage for damage to our U.S. Gulf of Mexico assets specifically resulting from a named windstorm, however, is subject to a maximum of $250 million per named windstorm, which includes a self-insured retention of 40 percent of the losses above a $100 million deductible and is limited to an annual aggregate of $300 million.
Our current insurance policies covering general liabilities provide coverage of $660 million subject to Apaches interest. This coverage is in excess of existing policies, including, but not limited to, aircraft liability, employers liability, and automobile liability. Our service agreements, including drilling contracts, generally indemnify Apache for injuries and death of the service providers employees as well as subcontractors hired by the service provider.
Future insurance coverage for our industry could increase in cost and may include higher deductibles or retentions. In addition, some forms of insurance may become unavailable.
53
Apache purchases multi-year political risk insurance from the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) and other highly rated international insurers covering its investments in Egypt. In the aggregate, these insurance policies, subject to the policy terms and conditions, provide approximately $1 billion of coverage to Apache for losses arising from confiscation, nationalization, and expropriation risks, with a $237.5 million sub-limit for currency inconvertibility.
In addition, the Company has a separate policy with OPIC, which, subject to policy terms and conditions, provides $300 million of coverage for losses arising from (1) non-payment by EGPC of arbitral awards covering amounts owed Apache on past due invoices and (2) expropriation of exportable petroleum in the event that actions taken by the government of Egypt prevent Apache from exporting our share of production. In October 2012, the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), a member of the World Bank Group, announced that it was providing $150 million in reinsurance to OPIC for the remainder of the policy term. This provision of long-term reinsurance to OPIC will allow Apache to maintain the $300 million of insurance coverage through 2024.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Apache prepares its financial statements and the accompanying notes in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Apache identifies certain accounting policies as critical based on, among other things, their impact on the portrayal of Apaches financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity and the degree of difficulty, subjectivity, and complexity in their deployment. Critical accounting policies cover accounting matters that are inherently uncertain because the future resolution of such matters is unknown. Management routinely discusses the development, selection, and disclosure of each of the critical accounting policies. The following is a discussion of Apaches most critical accounting policies.
Reserves Estimates
Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of natural gas, crude oil, condensate, and NGLs that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing conditions, operating conditions, and government regulations.
Proved undeveloped reserves include those reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. Undeveloped reserves may be classified as proved reserves on undrilled acreage directly offsetting development areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, or where reliable technology provides reasonable certainty of economic producibility. Undrilled locations may be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless specific circumstances justify a longer time.
Despite the inherent imprecision in these engineering estimates, our reserves are used throughout our financial statements. For example, since we use the units-of-production method to amortize our oil and gas properties, the quantity of reserves could significantly impact our DD&A expense. Our oil and gas properties are also subject to a ceiling limitation based in part on the quantity of our proved reserves. Finally, these reserves are the basis for our supplemental oil and gas disclosures.
Reserves are calculated using an unweighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect on the first day of each of the previous 12 months, held flat for the life of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements.
Apache has elected not to disclose probable and possible reserves or reserve estimates in this filing.
54
Asset Retirement Obligation (ARO)
The Company has significant obligations to remove tangible equipment and restore land or seabed at the end of oil and gas production operations. Apaches removal and restoration obligations are primarily associated with plugging and abandoning wells and removing and disposing of offshore oil and gas platforms in the North Sea and Australia. Estimating the future restoration and removal costs is difficult and requires management to make estimates and judgments. Asset removal technologies and costs are constantly changing, as are regulatory, political, environmental, safety, and public relations considerations.
ARO associated with retiring tangible long-lived assets is recognized as a liability in the period in which the legal obligation is incurred and becomes determinable. The liability is offset by a corresponding increase in the underlying asset. The ARO liability reflects the estimated present value of the amount of dismantlement, removal, site reclamation, and similar activities associated with Apaches oil and gas properties. The Company utilizes current retirement costs to estimate the expected cash outflows for retirement obligations. Inherent in the present value calculation are numerous assumptions and judgments including the ultimate settlement amounts, inflation factors, credit-adjusted discount rates, timing of settlement, and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental, and political environments. To the extent future revisions to these assumptions impact the present value of the existing ARO liability, a corresponding adjustment is made to the oil and gas property balance. Accretion expense is recognized over time as the discounted liability is accreted to its expected settlement value.
Income Taxes
Our oil and gas exploration and production operations are subject to taxation on income in numerous jurisdictions worldwide. We record deferred tax assets and liabilities to account for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements and our tax returns. We routinely assess the realizability of our deferred tax assets. If we conclude that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized under accounting standards, the tax asset would be reduced by a valuation allowance. Numerous judgments and assumptions are inherent in the determination of future taxable income, including factors such as future operating conditions (particularly as related to prevailing oil and gas prices).
The Company regularly assesses and, if required, establishes accruals for tax contingencies that could result from assessments of additional tax by taxing jurisdictions in countries where the Company operates. Tax reserves have been established and include any related interest, despite the belief by the Company that certain tax positions meet certain legislative, judicial, and regulatory requirements. These reserves are subject to a significant amount of judgment and are reviewed and adjusted on a periodic basis in light of changing facts and circumstances considering the progress of ongoing tax audits, case law, and any new legislation. The Company believes that the reserves established are adequate in relation to the potential for any additional tax assessments.
Purchase Price Allocation
Accounting for the acquisition of a business requires the allocation of the purchase price to the various assets and liabilities of the acquired business and recording deferred taxes for any differences between the allocated values and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Any excess of the purchase price over the amounts assigned to assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill.
The purchase price allocation is accomplished by recording each asset and liability at its estimated fair value. Estimated deferred taxes are based on available information concerning the tax basis of the acquired companys assets and liabilities and tax-related carryforwards at the merger date, although such estimates may change in the future as additional information becomes known. The amount of goodwill recorded in any particular business combination can vary significantly depending upon the values attributed to assets acquired and liabilities assumed relative to the total acquisition cost.
55
In estimating the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, we made various assumptions. The most significant assumptions relate to the estimated fair values assigned to proved and unproved crude oil and natural gas properties. To estimate the fair values of these properties, we prepared estimates of crude oil and natural gas reserves as described above in Reserve Estimates of this Item 7. Estimated fair values assigned to assets acquired can have a significant effect on results of operations in the future.
Goodwill
As of December 31, 2014, the Companys consolidated balance sheet included $87 million of goodwill, all of which has been assigned to the Egypt reporting unit. Goodwill is assessed at least annually for impairment at the reporting unit level. We conduct a qualitative goodwill impairment assessment as of July 1 st of each year by examining relevant events and circumstances which could have a negative impact on our goodwill such as macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors that have a negative effect on earnings and cash flows, overall financial performance, acquisitions and divestitures, and other relevant entity-specific events.
The first step of the impairment test requires management to make estimates regarding the fair value of each reporting unit to which goodwill has been assigned. If it is necessary to determine the fair value of the reporting unit, we use a combination of the income approach and the market approach.
Under the income approach, the fair value of each reporting unit is estimated based on the present value of expected future cash flows. The income approach is dependent on a number of factors including estimates of forecasted revenue and operating costs, proved reserves, the success of future exploration for and development of unproved reserves, discount rates, and other variables. Negative revisions of estimated reserves quantities, increases in future cost estimates, divestiture of a significant component of the reporting unit, or sustained decreases in crude oil or natural gas prices could lead to a reduction in expected future cash flows and possibly an impairment of all or a portion of goodwill in future periods.
Key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model described above include estimated quantities of crude oil and natural gas reserves, including both proved reserves and risk-adjusted unproved reserves; estimates of market prices considering forward commodity price curves as of the measurement date; and estimates of operating, administrative, and capital costs adjusted for inflation. We discount the resulting future cash flows using discount rates similar to those used by the Company in the valuation of acquisitions and divestitures.
To assess the reasonableness of our fair value estimate, we use a market approach to compare the fair value to similar businesses whose securities are actively traded in the public market. This requires management to make certain judgments about the selection of comparable companies, recent comparable asset transactions, and transaction premiums. Associated market multiples are applied to various financial metrics of the reporting unit to estimate fair value.
Although we base the fair value estimate of each reporting unit on assumptions we believe to be reasonable, those assumptions are inherently unpredictable and uncertain, and actual results could differ from the estimate. In the event of a prolonged global recession, commodity prices may stay depressed or decline further, thereby causing the fair value of the reporting unit to decline, which could result in an impairment of goodwill.
During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company recognized non-cash impairments of the entire amount of recorded goodwill in the U.S., North Sea, and Canada reporting units of $1.0 billion, $163 million, and $103 million, respectively.
ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The primary objective of the following information is to provide forward-looking quantitative and qualitative information about our exposure to market risk. The term market risk relates to the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in oil, gas, and NGL prices, interest rates, or foreign currency and adverse governmental
56
actions. The disclosures are not meant to be precise indicators of expected future losses, but rather indicators of reasonably possible losses. The forward-looking information provides indicators of how we view and manage our ongoing market risk exposures.
Commodity Risk
The Companys revenues, earnings, cash flow, capital investments and, ultimately, future rate of growth are highly dependent on the prices we receive for our crude oil, natural gas and NGLs, which have historically been very volatile because of unpredictable events such as economic growth or retraction, weather and political climate. In 2014, our average crude oil realizations decreased to $91.94 per barrel compared to $102.62 per barrel in 2013. Our average natural gas price realizations increased 9 percent in 2014 to $4.11 per Mcf from $3.77 per Mcf in 2013.
We periodically enter into derivative positions on a portion of our projected oil and natural gas production through a variety of financial and physical arrangements intended to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from changes in commodity prices. Apache typically uses futures contracts, swaps, and options to mitigate commodity price risk. In 2014 approximately 9 percent of our natural gas production from continuing operations and approximately 39 percent of our crude oil production from continuing operations was subject to financial derivative hedges, compared with 9 percent and 43 percent, respectively, in 2013.
On December 31, 2014, the Company did not have any open derivative positions. See Note 3Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company considers its interest rate risk exposure to be minimal as a result of fixing interest rates on approximately 86 percent of the Companys debt. At December 31, 2014, total debt included $1.6 billion of floating-rate debt. As a result, Apaches annual interest costs in 2015 will fluctuate based on short-term interest rates on approximately 14.0 percent of our total debt outstanding at December 31, 2014. A 10 percent change in floating interest rates on year-end floating debt balances would change annual interest expense by approximately $1 million.
Foreign Currency Risk
The Companys cash flow stream relating to certain international operations is based on the U.S. dollar equivalent of cash flows measured in foreign currencies. In Australia, oil production is sold under U.S. dollar contracts, and gas production is sold under a mixture of fixed-price U.S. dollar and Australian dollar contracts. Approximately 40 percent of the costs incurred for Australian operations are paid in U.S. dollars. In Canada, oil and gas prices and costs, such as equipment rentals and services, are generally denominated in Canadian dollars but are heavily influenced by U.S. markets. Our North Sea production is sold under U.S. dollar contracts, and the majority of costs incurred are paid in British pounds. In Egypt, all oil and gas production is sold under U.S. dollar contracts, and the majority of the costs incurred are denominated in U.S. dollars. Revenue and disbursement transactions denominated in Australian dollars, Canadian dollars, and British pounds are converted to U.S. dollar equivalents based on the average exchange rates during the period.
Foreign currency gains and losses also arise when monetary assets and monetary liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the end of each month. Currency gains and losses are included as either a component of Other under Revenues and Other or, as is the case when we re-measure our foreign tax liabilities, as a component of the Companys provision for income tax expense on the statement of consolidated operations. A 10 percent strengthening or weakening of the Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, and British pound against the U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2014, would result in a foreign currency net loss or gain, respectively, of approximately $135 million.
57
Forward-Looking Statements and Risk
This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts included or incorporated by reference in this report, including, without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected revenues, projected costs and plans, and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are based on our examination of historical operating trends, the information that was used to prepare our estimate of proved reserves as of December 31, 2014, and other data in our possession or available from third parties. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, could, expect, intend, project, estimate, anticipate, plan, believe, or continue or similar terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to, our assumptions about:
| the market prices of oil, natural gas, NGLs and other products or services; |
| our commodity derivative and hedging arrangements; |
| the supply and demand for oil, natural gas, NGLs and other products or services; |
| production and reserve levels; |
| drilling risks; |
| economic and competitive conditions; |
| the availability of capital resources; |
| capital expenditure and other contractual obligations; |
| currency exchange rates; |
| weather conditions; |
| inflation rates; |
| the availability of goods and services; |
| legislative or regulatory changes; |
| the impact on our operations due to changes in the Egyptian government; |
| the integration of acquisitions; |
| terrorism or cyber attacks; |
| occurrence of property acquisitions or divestitures; |
| the securities or capital markets and related risks such as general credit, liquidity, market, and interest-rate risks; and |
| other factors disclosed under Items 1 and 2Business and PropertiesEstimated Proved Reserves and Future Net Cash Flows, Item 1ARisk Factors, Item 7Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7AQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. |
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company, or persons acting on its behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements. Except as required by law, we assume no duty to update or revise our forward-looking statements based on changes in internal estimates or expectations or otherwise.
58
ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
The financial statements and supplementary financial information required to be filed under this Item 8 are presented on pages F-1 through F-68 in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
The financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, included in this report, have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, registered public accounting firm, as stated in their audit report appearing herein. There have been no changes in or disagreements with the accountants during the periods presented.
ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
John J. Christmann, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and President, in his capacity as principal executive officer, and P. Anthony Lannie, the Companys Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, in his capacity as principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2014, the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation and as of the date of that evaluation, these officers concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective, providing effective means to ensure that the information we are required to disclose under applicable laws and regulations is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms and accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We also made no changes in internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ending December 31, 2014, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
We periodically review the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls, including compliance with various laws and regulations that apply to our operations both inside and outside the United States. We make modifications to improve the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and may take other corrective action, if our reviews identify deficiencies or weaknesses in our controls.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting; Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
The management report called for by Item 308(a) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, included on Page F-1 in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.
The independent auditors attestation report called for by Item 308(b) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, included on Page F-3 in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ending December 31, 2014, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
59
PART III
ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
The information set forth under the captions Nominees for Election as Directors, Continuing Directors, Executive Officers of the Company, and Securities Ownership and Principal Holders in the proxy statement relating to the Companys 2015 annual meeting of shareholders (the Proxy Statement) is incorporated herein by reference.
Code of Business Conduct
Pursuant to Rule 303A.10 of the NYSE and Rule 4350(n) of the NASDAQ, we are required to adopt a code of business conduct and ethics for our directors, officers, and employees. In February 2004, the Board of Directors adopted the Code of Business Conduct (Code of Conduct), and revised it in November 2013. The revised Code of Conduct also meets the requirements of a code of ethics under Item 406 of Regulation S-K. You can access the Companys Code of Conduct on the Governance page of the Companys website at www.apachecorp.com . Any shareholder who so requests may obtain a printed copy of the Code of Conduct by submitting a request to the Companys corporate secretary at the address on the cover of this Form 10-K. Changes in and waivers to the Code of Conduct for the Companys directors, chief executive officer and certain senior financial officers will be posted on the Companys website within five business days and maintained for at least 12 months. Information on our website or any other website is not incorporated by reference into, and does not constitute a part of, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The information set forth under the captions Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Summary Compensation Table, Grants of Plan Based Awards Table, Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table, Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table, Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table, Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control and Director Compensation Table in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The information set forth under the captions Securities Ownership and Principal Holders and Equity Compensation Plan Information in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
The information set forth under the captions Certain Business Relationships and Transactions and Director Independence in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
The information set forth under the caption Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
60
PART IV
ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) | Documents included in this report: |
1. | Financial Statements |
F-1 | ||||
F-2 | ||||
F-3 | ||||
F-4 | ||||
F-5 | ||||
F-6 | ||||
F-7 | ||||
F-8 | ||||
F-9 |
2. | Financial Statement Schedules |
Financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are either not required, not applicable or the information required to be presented is included in the Companys financial statements and related notes.
3. | Exhibits |
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
2.1 | | Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between BP America Production Company and ZPZ Delaware I LLC dated July 20, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K/A, dated July 20, 2010, filed on July 21, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300) (the exhibits and schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K). | ||
2.2 | | Partnership Interest and Share Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between BP Canada Energy and Apache Canada Ltd. dated July 20, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K/A, dated July 20, 2010, filed on July 21, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300) (the exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K). | ||
2.3 | | Purchase and Sale Agreement by and among BP Egypt Company, BP Exploration (Delta) Limited and ZPZ Egypt Corporation LDC dated July 20, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K/A, dated July 20, 2010, filed on July 21, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300) (the exhibits and schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K). | ||
3.1 | | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, dated September 19, 2013, as filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on September 19, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 20, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). |
61
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
3.2 | | Bylaws of Registrant, as amended February 19, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2015, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.1 | | Form of Certificate for Registrants Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.2 | | Form of 3.625% Notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 30, 2010, filed on December 3, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.3 | | Form of 5.250% Notes due 2042 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 30, 2010, filed on December 3, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.4 | | Form of 5.100% Notes due 2040 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated August 17, 2010, filed on August 20, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.5 | | Form of 1.75% Notes due 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 3, 2012, filed on April 9, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.6 | | Form of 3.25% Note due 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 3, 2012, filed on April 9, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.7 | | Form of 4.75% Notes due 2043 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 3, 2012, filed on April 9, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.8 | | Form of 2.625% Notes due 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 28, 2012, filed on December 4, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.9 | | Form of 4.250% Notes due 2044 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 28, 2012, filed on December 4, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.10 | | Rights Agreement, dated January 31, 1996, between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (as successor-in-interest to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.), rights agent, relating to the declaration of a rights dividend to Registrants common shareholders of record on January 31, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (a) to Registrants Registration Statement on Form 8-A, dated January 24, 1996, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.11 | | Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 31, 2006, to the Rights Agreement dated as of January 31, 1996 between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (as successor-in-interest to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Registrants Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form 8-A, dated January 31, 2006, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.12 | | Amendment No. 2, dated March 10, 2014, to the Rights Agreement by and between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Amendment No. 2 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed March 10, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). |
62
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
4.13 | | Senior Indenture, dated February 15, 1996, between Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor-in-interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank), formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank, as trustee, governing the senior debt securities and guarantees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated May 23, 2003, Reg. No. 333-105536). | ||
4.14 | | First Supplemental Indenture to the Senior Indenture, dated as of November 5, 1996, between Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor-in-interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank), as trustee, governing the senior debt securities and guarantees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated May 23, 2003, Reg. No. 333-105536). | ||
4.15 | | Form of Indenture among Apache Finance Pty Ltd, Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor-in-interest to The Chase Manhattan Bank), as trustee, governing the debt securities and guarantees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated November 12, 1997, Reg. No. 333-339973). | ||
4.16 | | Form of Indenture among Registrant, Apache Finance Canada Corporation and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor-in-interest to The Chase Manhattan Bank), as trustee, governing the debt securities and guarantees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated November 12, 1999, Reg. No. 333-90147). | ||
4.17 | | Deposit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2010, between Registrants and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as depositary, on behalf of all holders from time to time of the receipts issued there under (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July 22, 2010, filed on July 28, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.18 | | Form of Depositary Receipt for the Depositary Shares (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July 22, 2010, filed on July 28, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.19 | | Senior Indenture, dated May 19, 2011, between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the senior debt securities of Apache Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated May 23, 2011, Reg. No. 333-174429). | ||
4.20 | | Senior Indenture, dated May 19, 2011, among Apache Finance Pty Ltd, Apache Corporation, as guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the senior debt securities of Apache Finance Pty Ltd and the related guarantees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated May 23, 2011, Reg. No. 333-174429). | ||
4.21 | | Senior Indenture, dated May 19, 2011, among Apache Finance Canada Corporation, Apache Corporation, as guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the senior debt securities of Apache Finance Corporation and the related guarantees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.20 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated May 23, 2011, Reg. No. 333-174429). |
63
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
4.22 | | Form of Apache Corporation November 10, 2010 First Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Certain Employees of Apache Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on November 10, 2010, Reg. No. 333-170533). | ||
4.23 | | Form of Apache Corporation November 10, 2010 Second Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Certain Employees of Apache Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on November 10, 2010, Reg. No. 333-170533). | ||
4.24 | | Form of Apache Corporation November 10, 2010 Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement for Certain Employees of Apache Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on November 10, 2010, Reg. No. 333-170533). | ||
10.1 | | Credit Agreement, dated August 12, 2011, among Registrant, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Citibank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 18, 2011, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.2 | | First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2013, among Apache Corporation, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the other agents party thereto, amending Credit Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2011, among the same parties (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.3 | | Credit Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2012, among Apache Corporation, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Global Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and Citibank, N.A., as Global Syndication Agents, and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and Royal Bank of Canada, as Global Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 7, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04300). | ||
10.4 | | Credit Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2012, among Apache Canada Ltd., the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Global Administrative Agent, Royal Bank of Canada, as Canadian Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and Citibank, N.A., as Global Syndication Agents, and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and Royal Bank of Canada, as Global Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 7, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04300). | ||
10.5 | | Syndicated Facility Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2012, among Apache Energy Limited (ACN 009 301 964), the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Global Administrative Agent, Citisecurities Limited (ABN 51 008 489 610), as Australian Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and Citibank, N.A., as Global Syndication Agents, and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and Royal Bank of Canada, as Global Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 7, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04300). | ||
10.6 | | Credit Agreement, dated December 11, 2014, among Registrant, the lenders party thereto, Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 15, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). |
64
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
10.7 | | Apache Corporation Corporate Incentive Compensation Plan A (Senior Officers Plan), dated July 16, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.8 | | First Amendment to Apache Corporation Corporate Incentive Compensation Plan A, dated November 20, 2008, effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2008, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.9 | | Apache Corporation Corporate Incentive Compensation Plan B (Strategic Objectives Format), dated July 16, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.10 | | First Amendment to Apache Corporation Corporate Incentive Compensation Plan B, dated November 20, 2008, effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2008, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.11 | | Apache Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan, as amended and restated, dated May 14, 2013, effective May 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.12 | | Amendment to Apache Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan, dated October 25, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.13 | | Amendment to Apache Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan, dated April 17, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300.) | ||
10.14 | | Amendment to Apache Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan, dated May 16, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.15 | | Non-Qualified Retirement/Savings Plan of Apache Corporation, as amended and restated July 14, 2010, except as otherwise specified (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.16 | | Amendment to Apache Corporation Non-Qualified Retirement/Savings Plan of Apache Corporation, dated December 19, 2011, effective January 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Registrants Annual Report Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2011, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.17 | | Amendment to Non-Qualified Retirement/Savings Plan of Apache Corporation, dated November 8, 2012, effective January 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.18 | | Non-Qualified Retirement/Savings Plan of Apache Corporation, as amended and restated, dated July 16, 2014, effective January 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). |
65
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
10.19 | | Non-Qualified Restorative Retirement Savings Plan of Apache Corporation, dated November 7, 2011, effective January 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8, dated December 21, 2011, Reg. No. 333-178672). | ||
10.20 | | Amendment to Non-Qualified Restorative Retirement Savings Plan of Apache Corporation, dated November 8, 2012, effective January 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.21 | | Non-Qualified Restorative Retirement Savings Plan of Apache Corporation, as amended and restated, dated July 16, 2014, effective January 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300) | ||
10.22 | | Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended and restated February 3, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.23 | | Apache Corporation 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended and restated May 4, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.24 | | Apache Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated May 5, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.25 | | Apache Corporation 2003 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan, as amended and restated September 16, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.26 | | Apache Corporation 2005 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated September 16, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 2013, Commission File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.27 | | Apache Corporation Income Continuance Plan, as amended and restated July 14, 2010, effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.28 | | Apache Corporation Deferred Delivery Plan, as amended and restated November 11, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.29 | | Apache Corporation Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan, as amended and restated February 6, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.30 | | Apache Corporation Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan, as amended and restated July 16, 2014, effective July 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.31 | | Apache Corporation Outside Directors Retirement Plan, as amended and restated February 6, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). |
66
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
10.32 | | Apache Corporation Outside Directors Retirement Plan, as amended and restated July 16, 2014, effective June 30, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.33 | | Apache Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended and restated February 8, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2007, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.34 | | Apache Corporation Non-Employee Directors Restricted Stock Units Program Specifications, dated May 5, 2011, pursuant to Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.35 | | Apache Corporation Non-Employee Directors Restricted Stock Units Program Specifications, as amended and restated May 15, 2013, pursuant to Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.36 | | Apache Corporation Non-Employee Directors Restricted Stock Units Program, as amended and restated July 16, 2014, pursuant to Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.37 | | Apache Corporation Outside Directors Deferral Program, effective July 16, 2014, pursuant to Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.38 | | Employment Agreement between Registrant and G. Steven Farris, dated June 6, 1988, and First Amendment, dated November 20, 2008, effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2008, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
*10.39 | | Retirement Agreement, dated January 19, 2015, between Registrant and G. Steven Farris. | ||
10.40 | | Employee Release and Settlement Agreement, dated February 11, 2014, between Registrant and Roger B. Plank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.41 | | Employee Release and Settlement Agreement, effective August 31, 2014, between Registrant and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300.) | ||
10.42 | | Employee Resignation Agreement, effective October 13, 2014, between Registrant and Alfonso Leon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300.) | ||
10.43 | | Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated May 8, 2008, between Registrant and G. Steven Farris (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2008, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.44 | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated February 12, 2009, between Registrant and each of Rodney J. Eichler and Roger B. Plank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 12, 2009, filed February 18, 2009, SEC File No. 001-4300). |
67
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
10.45 | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated November 18, 2009, between Registrant and Michael S. Bahorich (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2009, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.46 | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement, dated May 6, 2009, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Roger B. Plank, Rodney J. Eichler, and Michael S. Bahorich (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2009, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.47 | | Form of Stock Option Award Agreement, dated May 6, 2009, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Roger B. Plank, Rodney J. Eichler, and Michael S. Bahorich (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2009, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.48 | | Form of 2010 Performance Program Agreement, dated January 15, 2010, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Rodney J. Eichler, and Roger B. Plank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 19, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.49 | | Form of First Amendment, effective May 5, 2010, to 2010 Performance Program Agreement, dated January 15, 2010, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Rodney J. Eichler, and Roger B. Plank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 11, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.50 | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated January 15, 2010, between Registrant and each of Rodney J. Eichler and Roger B. Plank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 19, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.51 | | Form of 2011 Performance Program Agreement, dated January 7, 2011, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Rodney J. Eichler, Roger B. Plank, Michael S. Bahorich, and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 13, 2011, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.52 | | Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated February 9, 2011, between Registrant and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2011, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.53 | | Form of 2012 Performance Program Agreement, dated January 11, 2012, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Rodney J. Eichler, Roger B. Plank, P. Anthony Lannie, and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 13, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.54 | | Form of 2013 Performance Program Agreement, dated January 9, 2013, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Rodney J. Eichler, Roger B. Plank, and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 11, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.55 | | Form of 2014 Performance Agreement (Total Shareholder Return), dated January 9, 2014, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Rodney J. Eichler, Roger B. Plank, P. Anthony Lannie, and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). |
68
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
10.56 | | Form of 2014 Performance Agreement (Business Performance), dated February 3, 2014, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Roger B. Plank, Rodney J. Eichler, P. Anthony Lannie, and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.57 | | Amendments of Stock Option Grants (2007 and 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plans), dated February 13, 2014, between Registrant and Roger B. Plank (incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.3 and 10.4 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.58 | | Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Awards, dated February 13, 2014, between Registrant and Roger B. Plank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.59 | | Amendment of Stock Option Grants (2007 and 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plans), effective August 31, 2014, between Registrant and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.60 | | Amendment of Restricted Stock Unit Awards (2007 and 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plans), effective August 31, 2014, between Registrant and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.61 | | Amendment of Stock Option Grants (2007 and 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plans), effective October 9, 2014, between Registrant and Alfonso Leon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.62 | | Amendment of Restricted Stock Unit Awards (2007 and 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plans), effective October 9, 2014, between Registrant and Alfonso Leon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
*10.63 | | Amendment of Stock Option Grants (2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan), dated January 20, 2015, between Registrant and G. Steven Farris. | ||
*10.64 | | Amendment of Restricted Stock Unit Awards (2007 and 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plans), dated January 20, 2015, between Registrant and G. Steven Farris. | ||
*10.65 | | Amendment of 2014 Performance Program (Business Performance) Award (2011 Omnibus Compensation Plan), dated January 20, 2015, between Registrant and G. Steven Farris. | ||
*12.1 | | Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends. | ||
*14.1 | | Code of Business Conduct dated January 20, 2014. | ||
*21.1 | | Subsidiaries of Registrant | ||
*23.1 | | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP | ||
*23.2 | | Consent of Ryder Scott Company L.P., Petroleum Consultants | ||
*24.1 | | Power of Attorney (included as a part of the signature pages to this report) | ||
*31.1 | | Certification (pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act) by Principal Executive Officer. |
69
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
*31.2 | | Certification (pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act) by Principal Financial Officer. | ||
*32.1 | | Section 1350 Certification (pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906) by Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. | ||
*99.1 | | Report of Ryder Scott Company L.P., Petroleum Consultants | ||
*101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document. | ||
*101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Schema Document. | ||
*101.CAL | | XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document. | ||
*101.LAB | | XBRL Label Linkbase Document. | ||
*101.PRE | | XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document. | ||
*101.DEF | | XBRL Definition Linkbase Document. |
* | Filed herewith. |
| Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed herewith pursuant to Item 15 hereof. |
NOTE: Debt instruments of the Registrant defining the rights of long-term debt holders in principal amounts not exceeding 10 percent of the Registrants consolidated assets have been omitted and will be provided to the Commission upon request.
70
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
APACHE CORPORATION
/s/ John J. Christmann |
John J. Christmann |
Chief Executive Officer and President |
Dated: February 27, 2015
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The officers and directors of Apache Corporation, whose signatures appear below, hereby constitute and appoint John J. Christmann, P. Anthony Lannie, and Rebecca A. Hoyt, and each of them (with full power to each of them to act alone), the true and lawful attorney-in-fact to sign and execute, on behalf of the undersigned, any amendment(s) to this report and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys shall do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name |
Title |
Date |
||
/s/ JOHN J. CHRISTMANN John J. Christmann |
Chief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) |
February 27, 2015 | ||
/s/ P. ANTHONY LANNIE P. Anthony Lannie |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) |
February 27, 2015 | ||
/s/ REBECCA A. HOYT Rebecca A. Hoyt |
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller (principal accounting officer) | February 27, 2015 |
71
Name |
Title |
Date |
||
/s/ G. STEVEN FARRIS G. Steven Farris |
Director |
February 27, 2015 | ||
/s/ ANNELL R. BAY Annell R. Bay |
Director |
February 27, 2015 | ||
/s/ A.D. FRAZIER, JR. A. D. Frazier, Jr. |
Director |
February 27, 2015 | ||
/s/ CHANSOO JOUNG Chansoo Joung |
Director |
February 27, 2015 | ||
/s/ GEORGE D. LAWRENCE George D. Lawrence |
Director |
February 27, 2015 | ||
/s/ JOHN E. LOWE John E. Lowe |
Director |
February 27, 2015 | ||
/s/ WILLIAM C. MONTGOMERY William C. Montgomery |
Director |
February 27, 2015 | ||
/s/ AMY H. NELSON Amy H. Nelson |
Director |
February 27, 2015 | ||
/s/ RODMAN D. PATTON Rodman D. Patton |
Director |
February 27, 2015 | ||
/s/ CHARLES J. PITMAN Charles J. Pitman |
Director |
February 27, 2015 | ||
/s/ PETER A. RAGAUSS Peter A. Ragauss |
Director |
February 27, 2015 |
72
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of the Company is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the consolidated financial statements appearing in this annual report on Form 10-K. The financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and include amounts that are based on managements best estimates and judgments.
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. Our internal control over financial reporting is supported by a program of internal audits and appropriate reviews by management, written policies and guidelines, careful selection and training of qualified personnel and a written code of business conduct adopted by our Companys board of directors, applicable to all Company directors and all officers and employees of our Company and subsidiaries.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and even when determined to be effective, can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessment, management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.
The Companys independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, a registered public accounting firm, are appointed by the Audit Committee of the Companys board of directors. Ernst & Young LLP have audited and reported on the consolidated financial statements of Apache Corporation and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. The reports of the independent auditors follow this report on pages F-2 and F-3.
/s/ John J. Christmann
Chief Executive Officer and President
(principal executive officer)
/s/ P. Anthony Lannie
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
/s/ Rebecca A. Hoyt
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller
(principal accounting officer)
Houston, Texas
February 27, 2015
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Apache Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Apache Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related statements of consolidated operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows, and changes in equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Apache Corporation and subsidiaries at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Apache Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 27, 2015, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Houston, Texas
February 27, 2015
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Apache Corporation:
We have audited Apache Corporation and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Apache Corporation and subsidiaries management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Apache Corporation and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Apache Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related statements of consolidated operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows, and changes in equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014 of Apache Corporation and subsidiaries, and our report dated February 27, 2015, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Houston, Texas
February 27, 2015
F-3
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
F-4
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTEREST |
$ | (5,060 | ) | $ | 2,288 | $ | 2,001 | |||||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): |
||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefit plan, net of tax |
| 9 | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Commodity cash flow hedge activity, net of tax: |
||||||||||||
Reclassification of (gain) loss on settled derivative instruments |
| 11 | (199 | ) | ||||||||
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |
(1 | ) | (5 | ) | 79 | |||||||
Derivative hedge ineffectiveness reclassified into earnings |
| 1 | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(1 | ) | 16 | (122 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTEREST |
(5,061 | ) | 2,304 | 1,879 | ||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| 44 | 76 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
343 | 56 | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK |
$ | (5,404 | ) | $ | 2,204 | $ | 1,803 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
F-5
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended
December 31, |
||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest |
$ | (5,060 | ) | $ | 2,288 | $ | 2,001 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Loss (income) from discontinued operations |
517 | 192 | (14 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization |
10,158 | 6,289 | 6,881 | |||||||||
Impairments |
2,357 | | | |||||||||
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
181 | 238 | 228 | |||||||||
Provision for deferred income taxes |
495 | 261 | 654 | |||||||||
Other |
(51 | ) | 268 | 223 | ||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Receivables |
828 | 112 | 28 | |||||||||
Inventories |
(44 | ) | (71 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||||
Drilling advances |
(56 | ) | 234 | (343 | ) | |||||||
Deferred charges and other |
(211 | ) | (148 | ) | 41 | |||||||
Accounts payable |
(294 | ) | 491 | (84 | ) | |||||||
Accrued expenses |
(450 | ) | (566 | ) | (1,133 | ) | ||||||
Deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities |
9 | 15 | (141 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY CONTINUING OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
8,379 | 9,603 | 8,281 | |||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
82 | 232 | 223 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
8,461 | 9,835 | 8,504 | |||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Additions to oil and gas property |
(9,721 | ) | (9,612 | ) | (7,428 | ) | ||||||
Additions to gas gathering, transmission, and processing facilities |
(1,159 | ) | (1,190 | ) | (733 | ) | ||||||
Leasehold and property acquisitions |
(1,492 | ) | (419 | ) | (1,303 | ) | ||||||
Acquisition of Cordillera Energy Partners III, LLC |
| | (2,666 | ) | ||||||||
Acquisition of Yara Pilbara Holdings Pty Limited |
| | (439 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of Deepwater Gulf of Mexico assets |
1,360 | | | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of Anadarko Basin and Southern Louisiana assets |
1,262 | | | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of Gulf of Mexico Shelf properties |
| 3,702 | | |||||||||
Proceeds from Kitimat LNG transaction, net |
| 396 | | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties, other |
470 | 307 | 27 | |||||||||
Other, net |
(272 | ) | (90 | ) | (555 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET CASH USED IN CONTINUING INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(9,552 | ) | (6,906 | ) | (13,097 | ) | ||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
748 | (210 | ) | (327 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(8,804 | ) | (7,116 | ) | (13,424 | ) | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Commercial paper, credit facilities and bank notes, net |
1,568 | (509 | ) | 511 | ||||||||
Fixed rate debt borrowings |
| | 4,978 | |||||||||
Payments on fixed rate debt |
| (2,072 | ) | (400 | ) | |||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
(140 | ) | | | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interest |
| 2,948 | | |||||||||
Dividends paid |
(365 | ) | (360 | ) | (332 | ) | ||||||
Treasury stock activity, net |
(1,864 | ) | (997 | ) | | |||||||
Other |
49 | 21 | (10 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) CONTINUING FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
(752 | ) | (969 | ) | 4,747 | |||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
(42 | ) | (4 | ) | 38 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
(794 | ) | (973 | ) | 4,785 | |||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(1,137 | ) | 1,746 | (135 | ) | |||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR |
1,906 | 160 | 295 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | 769 | $ | 1,906 | $ | 160 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW DATA: |
||||||||||||
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest |
$ | 134 | $ | 192 | $ | 146 | ||||||
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
1,357 | 1,766 | 2,590 |
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
F-6
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
F-7
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED CHANGES IN EQUITY
Series D
Preferred Stock |
Common
Stock |
Paid-In
Capital |
Retained
Earnings |
Treasury
Stock |
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive (Loss) |
APACHE
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Non
Controlling Interest |
TOTAL
EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2011 |
$ | 1,227 | $ | 241 | $ | 9,066 | $ | 18,500 | $ | (32 | ) | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 28,993 | $ | | $ | 28,993 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 2,001 | | | 2,001 | | 2,001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Postretirement, net of tax of $5 |
| | | | | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity hedges, net of tax of $35 |
| | | | | (120 | ) | (120 | ) | | (120 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred |
| | | (76 | ) | | | (76 | ) | | (76 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common ($0.68 per share) |
| | | (264 | ) | | | (264 | ) | | (264 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common shares issued |
| 3 | 598 | | | | 601 | | 601 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock activity, net |
| 1 | (44 | ) | | | | (43 | ) | | (43 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock activity, net |
| | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation expense |
| | 238 | | | | 238 | | 238 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 |
$ | 1,227 | $ | 245 | $ | 9,859 | $ | 20,161 | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (131 | ) | $ | 31,331 | $ | | $ | 31,331 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 2,232 | | | 2,232 | 56 | 2,288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Postretirement, net of tax of $9 |
| | | | | 9 | 9 | | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity hedges, net of tax of $4 |
| | | | | 7 | 7 | | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred |
| | | (44 | ) | | | (44 | ) | | (44 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common ($0.80 per share) |
| | | (317 | ) | | | (317 | ) | | (317 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock activity, net |
| 1 | (22 | ) | | | | (21 | ) | | (21 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock activity, net |
| | | | (997 | ) | | (997 | ) | | (997 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of noncontrolling interest |
| | 1,007 | | | | 1,007 | 1,941 | 2,948 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of Series D preferred stock |
(1,227 | ) | 9 | 1,218 | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation expense |
| | 189 | | | | 189 | | 189 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2013 |
$ | | $ | 255 | $ | 12,251 | $ | 22,032 | $ | (1,027 | ) | $ | (115 | ) | $ | 33,396 | $ | 1,997 | $ | 35,393 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
| | | (5,403 | ) | | | (5,403 | ) | 343 | (5,060 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
| | | | | | | (140 | ) | (140 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity hedges, net of tax |
| | | | | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common dividends ($1.00 per share) |
| | | (380 | ) | | | (380 | ) | | (380 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock activity, net |
| 1 | (11 | ) | | | | (10 | ) | | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock activity, net |
| | (1 | ) | | (1,863 | ) | | (1,864 | ) | | (1,864 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation expense |
| | 202 | | | | 202 | | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | (3 | ) | | | | (3 | ) | | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2014 |
$ | | $ | 256 | $ | 12,438 | $ | 16,249 | $ | (2,890 | ) | $ | (116 | ) | $ | 25,937 | $ | 2,200 | $ | 28,137 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
F-8
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Nature of Operations
Apache Corporation (Apache or the Company) is an independent energy company that explores for, develops, and produces natural gas, crude oil, and natural gas liquids. The Company has exploration and production interests in five countries: the United States (U.S.), Canada, Egypt, Australia, and the United Kingdom (U.K.) North Sea (North Sea). Apache also pursues exploration interests in other countries that may over time result in reportable discoveries and development opportunities.
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Accounting policies used by Apache and its subsidiaries reflect industry practices and conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP). The Companys financial statements for prior periods may include reclassifications that were made to conform to the current-year presentation. In March 2014, Apache completed the sale of all of its operations in Argentina. Results of operations and cash flows for Argentina operations are reflected as discontinued operations in the Companys financial statements for all periods presented. Significant policies are discussed below.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Apache and its subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany balances and transactions. The Companys undivided interests in oil and gas exploration and production ventures and partnerships are proportionately consolidated. The Company consolidates all other investments in which, either through direct or indirect ownership, Apache has more than a 50 percent voting interest or controls the financial and operating decisions. Noncontrolling interests represent third-party ownership in the net assets of a consolidated Apache subsidiary and are reflected separately in the Companys financial statements. Investments in which Apache holds less than 50 percent of the voting interest are typically accounted for under the equity method of accounting, with the balance recorded as a component of Deferred charges and other in Apaches consolidated balance sheet and results of operations recorded as a component of Other under Revenues and Other in the Companys statement of consolidated operations.
Use of Estimates
Preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Apache evaluates its estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions used in preparation of its financial statements and changes in these estimates are recorded when known. Significant estimates with regard to these financial statements include the fair value determination of acquired assets and liabilities and assets held for sale at year-end (see Note 2 Acquisitions and Divestitures), the estimate of proved oil and gas reserves and related present value estimates of future net cash flows therefrom (see Note 14 Supplemental Oil and Gas Disclosures), the assessment of asset retirement obligations (see Note 5 Asset Retirement Obligation), and the estimate of income taxes (see Note 7 Income Taxes).
F-9
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair Value Measurements
Certain assets and liabilities are reported at fair value on a recurring basis in Apaches consolidated balance sheet. Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10-35 provides a hierarchy that prioritizes and defines the types of inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs, which consist of unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. Level 2 inputs consist of quoted prices for similar instruments. Level 3 valuations are derived from inputs that are significant and unobservable; hence, these valuations have the lowest priority.
The valuation techniques that may be used to measure fair value include a market approach, an income approach, and a cost approach. A market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. An income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based on current market expectations, including present value techniques, option-pricing models, and the excess earnings method. The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).
Fair value measurements are presented in further detail in Note 3 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, Note 6 Debt, and Note 9 Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans.
Apache also uses fair value measurements on a nonrecurring basis as indicated by certain qualitative assessments of its assets. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded asset impairments totaling $2.4 billion in connection with fair value assessments, including $1.3 billion for the impairment of goodwill, $1.0 billion for the impairment of assets held for sale, and other asset impairments at December 31, 2014. For discussion of these impairments, see Goodwill below and Note 2 Acquisitions and Divestitures.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid short-term investments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. These investments are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, Apache had $769 million and $1.9 billion, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable are stated at the historical carrying amount net of write-offs and an allowance for doubtful accounts. The carrying amount of Apaches accounts receivable approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of the instruments. The Company routinely assesses the collectability of all material trade and other receivables. Many of Apaches receivables are from joint interest owners on properties Apache operates. The Company may have the ability to withhold future revenue disbursements to recover any non-payment of these joint interest billings. The Company accrues a reserve on a receivable when, based on the judgment of management, it is probable that a receivable will not be collected and the amount of any reserve may be reasonably estimated. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had an allowance for doubtful accounts of $98 million and $96 million, respectively.
Inventories
Inventories consist principally of tubular goods and equipment, stated at weighted-average cost, and oil produced but not sold, stated at the lower of cost or market.
F-10
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Property and Equipment
The carrying value of Apaches property and equipment represents the cost incurred to acquire the property and equipment, including capitalized interest. Interest costs incurred in connection with qualifying capital expenditures are capitalized and amortized in concurrence with the related assets. For business combinations, property and equipment cost is based on the fair values at the acquisition date.
Oil and Gas Property
The Company follows the full-cost method of accounting for its oil and gas property. Under this method of accounting, all costs incurred for both successful and unsuccessful exploration and development activities, including salaries, benefits, and other internal costs directly identified with these activities, and oil and gas property acquisitions are capitalized. All costs related to production, general corporate overhead, and similar activities are expensed as incurred. Apache capitalized $373 million, $401 million, and $402 million of internal costs in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
Proved properties are amortized on a country-by-country basis using the units of production method (UOP). The UOP calculation multiplies the percentage of estimated proved reserves produced each quarter by the cost of those reserves. The amortization base in the UOP calculation includes the sum of proved property, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A), estimated future development costs (future costs to access and develop proved reserves), and asset retirement costs, less related salvage value.
The cost of unproved properties and properties under development are excluded from the amortization calculation until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to such properties or until development projects are placed in service. Geological and geophysical costs not associated with specific prospects are recorded to proved property immediately. Unproved properties and properties under development are reviewed for impairment at least quarterly. In countries where proved reserves exist, exploratory drilling costs associated with dry holes are transferred to proved properties immediately upon determination that a well is dry and amortized accordingly. In countries where a reserve base has not yet been established, impairments are charged to earnings and are determined through an evaluation considering, among other factors, seismic data, requirements to relinquish acreage, drilling results, remaining time in the commitment period, remaining capital plan, and political, economic, and market conditions. In 2013, Apaches statement of consolidated operations includes additional DD&A of $75 million related to exiting operations in Kenya.
Under the full-cost method of accounting, the net book value of oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, may not exceed a calculated ceiling. The ceiling limitation is the estimated after-tax future net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves, discounted at 10 percent per annum and adjusted for designated cash flow hedges. Future cash outflows associated with settling accrued asset retirement obligations are excluded from the calculation. Estimated future net cash flows are calculated using end-of-period costs and an unweighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect on the first day of each of the previous 12 months, held flat for the life of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements. See Note 14Supplemental Oil and Gas Disclosures for a discussion of the calculation of estimated future net cash flows.
Any excess of the net book value of proved oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, over the ceiling is charged to expense and reflected as additional DD&A in the accompanying statement of consolidated operations. Such limitations are imposed separately on a country-by-country basis and are tested quarterly. During 2014, Apache recorded $4.4 billion ($2.8 billion net of tax) and $589 million ($224 million net of tax) in non-cash write-downs of the carrying value of the Companys U.S. and North Sea proved oil and gas properties, respectively. During 2013, Apache recorded non-cash write-downs of the carrying value of the
F-11
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Companys proved oil and gas properties for its continuing operations totaling $920 million. The after-tax impact of these write-downs was $356 million in the U.S. and $139 million in the North Sea. In addition, the Company recorded a non-cash write-down of $118 million, net of tax, in Argentina, which is reflected as discontinued operations in the Companys consolidated financial statements. Cash flow hedges did not materially affect the 2014 and 2013 calculations.
Proceeds from the sale or disposition of oil and gas properties are accounted for as a reduction to capitalized costs unless a significant portion (greater than 25 percent) of the Companys reserve quantities in a particular country are sold, in which case a gain or loss is recognized in income. During 2014, Apache recorded a $539 million loss related to the divestiture of operations in Argentina. No gain or loss was recorded on the Companys divestitures in 2013 or 2012.
Gathering, Transmission, and Processing (GTP) Facilities
The Company assesses the carrying amount of its GTP facilities whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of these facilities is less than the sum of the undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the excess of the carrying value over its fair value. In December 2014, the Company recorded an impairment of its GTP assets related to the announced sale of Apaches Wheatstone and Kitimat LNG projects, and the remaining carrying value was reclassified to Assets Held for Sale on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. In total, GTP assets were reduced $2.5 billion in connection with this divestiture. Excluding assets held for sale, GTP facilities totaled $5.4 billion and $7.0 billion at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. See Note 2 Acquisitions and Divestitures for a discussion of GTP facilities held for sale as of December 31, 2014. No impairment of GTP facilities was recognized during 2013 or 2012.
During 2014, Apache recorded a loss on the sale of GTP facilities totaling $180 million associated with the Companys divestitures of certain Anadarko basin and Southern Louisiana assets. No gain or loss on the sales of GTP facilities was recognized during 2013 or 2012. The costs of GTP facilities retired or otherwise disposed of and the applicable accumulated depreciation are removed from the Apaches consolidated financial statements, and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in Other under Revenues and Other in the Companys statement of consolidated operations.
GTP facilities are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimation of useful life takes into consideration anticipated production lives from the fields serviced by the GTP assets, whether Apache-operated or third party, as well as potential development plans by Apache for undeveloped acreage within or in close proximity to those fields. Accumulated depreciation for these assets totaled $1.7 billion and $1.5 billion at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Other Property and Equipment
Other property and equipment includes computer software and equipment, buildings, vehicles, furniture and fixtures, land, and other equipment. These assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 3 to 20 years. Accumulated depreciation for these assets totaled $673 million and $608 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Asset Retirement Costs and Obligations
The initial estimated asset retirement obligation related to property and equipment is recorded as a liability at its fair value, with an offsetting asset retirement cost recorded as an increase to the associated property and equipment on the consolidated balance sheet. If the fair value of the recorded asset retirement obligation changes,
F-12
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
a revision is recorded to both the asset retirement obligation and the asset retirement cost. Revisions in estimated liabilities can result from changes in estimated inflation rates, changes in service and equipment costs and changes in the estimated timing of an assets retirement. Asset retirement costs are depreciated using a systematic and rational method similar to that used for the associated property and equipment. Accretion expense on the liability is recognized over the estimated productive life of the related assets.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an entity over the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The Company assesses the carrying amount of goodwill by testing for impairment annually and when impairment indicators arise. The impairment test requires allocating goodwill and all other assets and liabilities to assigned reporting units. Apache assesses each country as a reporting unit. The fair value of each unit is determined and compared to the book value of the reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the book value, including goodwill, then goodwill is written down to the implied fair value of the goodwill through a charge to expense.
In order to determine the fair value of each reporting unit, the Company uses a combination of the income approach and the market approach. The income approach considers management views on current operating measures as well as assumptions pertaining to market forces in the oil and gas industry, such as future production, future commodity prices, and costs. These assumptions are applied to develop future cash flow projections that are then discounted to estimate fair value, using a discount rate similar to those used by the Company in the valuation of acquisitions and divestitures. To assess the reasonableness of its fair value estimate, the Company uses a market approach to compare the fair value to similar businesses whose securities are actively traded in the public market. This requires management to make certain judgments about the selection of comparable companies, recent comparable asset transactions, and transaction premiums. Associated market multiples are applied to various financial metrics of the reporting unit to estimate fair value. Apache has classified this reporting unit estimation as a non-recurring Level 3 fair value measurement in the fair value hierarchy.
As of December 31, 2013, goodwill totaled $1.4 billion, with approximately $1.0 billion, $163 million, $103 million, and $87 million recorded in the U.S., North Sea, Canada, and Egypt, respectively. Given the significant reduction in oil and gas commodity prices in December 2014, the Company tested goodwill for impairment as of December 31, 2014. Reductions in estimated net present value of expected future cash flows from oil and gas properties resulted in implied fair values below the carrying values of Apaches U.S., North Sea, and Canada reporting units. No impairment was indicated for the Companys Egypt reporting unit. As a result of these assessments, during the fourth quarter of 2014 the Company recognized non-cash impairments of the entire amount of recorded goodwill in the U.S., North Sea, and Canada reporting units of $1.0 billion, $163 million, and $103 million, respectively. These goodwill impairments have been recorded in Impairments in the Companys statement of consolidated operations. As of December 31, 2014, total goodwill of $87 million remained recorded for the Egypt reporting unit.
No impairment of goodwill was recognized during 2013 and 2012.
Accounts Payable
Included in accounts payable at December 31, 2014 and 2013, are liabilities of approximately $229 million and $271 million, respectively, representing the amount by which checks issued but not presented to the Companys banks for collection exceeded balances in applicable bank accounts.
F-13
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Commitments and Contingencies
Accruals for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, environmental and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. These accruals are adjusted as additional information becomes available or circumstances change.
Revenue Recognition and Imbalances
Oil and gas revenues are recognized when production is sold to a purchaser at a fixed or determinable price, when delivery has occurred and title has transferred, and if collectability of the revenue is probable. Cash received relating to future revenues is deferred and recognized when all revenue recognition criteria are met.
Apache uses the sales method of accounting for gas production imbalances. The volumes of gas sold may differ from the volumes to which Apache is entitled based on its interests in the properties. These differences create imbalances that are recognized as a liability only when the properties estimated remaining reserves net to Apache will not be sufficient to enable the under-produced owner to recoup its entitled share through production. The Companys recorded liability is generally reflected in other non-current liabilities. No receivables are recorded for those wells where Apache has taken less than its share of production. Gas imbalances are reflected as adjustments to estimates of proved gas reserves and future cash flows in the unaudited supplemental oil and gas disclosures.
Apache markets its own North American natural gas production. Since the Companys production fluctuates because of operational issues, it is occasionally necessary to purchase third-party gas to fulfill sales obligations and commitments. Both the costs and sales proceeds of this third-party gas are reported on a net basis in oil and gas production revenues. The costs of third-party gas netted against the related sales proceeds totaled $46 million, $34 million, and $27 million, for 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
The Companys Egyptian operations are conducted pursuant to production sharing contracts under which contractor partners pay all operating and capital costs for exploring and developing the concessions. A percentage of the production, generally up to 40 percent, is available to contractor partners to recover these operating and capital costs over contractually defined periods. Cost recovery is reflected in revenue. The balance of the production is split among the contractor partners and the Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation (EGPC) on a contractually defined basis.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Apache periodically enters into derivative contracts to manage its exposure to commodity price risk. These derivative contracts, which are generally placed with major financial institutions, may take the form of forward contracts, futures contracts, swaps, or options. The oil and gas reference prices upon which the commodity derivative contracts are based reflect various market indices that have a high degree of historical correlation with actual prices received by the Company for its oil and gas production. As of December 31, 2014, Apache had no open derivative positions.
When applicable, Apache records all derivative instruments, other than those that meet the normal purchases and sales exception, on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Gains and losses from the change in fair value of derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are reported in current-period income as Derivative instrument gains (losses), net under Revenues and Other in the statement of consolidated operations. Hedge accounting treatment allows unrealized gains and losses on cash
F-14
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
flow hedges to be deferred in other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses from the Companys oil and gas cash flow hedges, including terminated contracts, are generally recognized in oil and gas production revenues when the forecasted transaction occurs. If at any time the likelihood of occurrence of a hedged forecasted transaction ceases to be probable, hedge accounting treatment will cease on a prospective basis, and all future changes in the fair value of the derivative will be recognized directly in earnings. Amounts recorded in other comprehensive income prior to the change in the likelihood of occurrence of the forecasted transaction will remain in other comprehensive income until such time as the forecasted transaction impacts earnings. If it becomes probable that the original forecasted production will not occur, then the derivative gain or loss would be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings immediately. Hedge effectiveness is measured at least quarterly based on the relative changes in fair value between the derivative contract and the hedged item over time, and any ineffectiveness is immediately reported as Other under Revenues and Other in the statement of consolidated operations.
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expenses are reported net of recoveries from owners in properties operated by Apache and net of amounts related to lease operating activities or capitalized pursuant to the full-cost method of accounting.
Income Taxes
Apache records deferred tax assets and liabilities to account for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements and tax returns. The Company routinely assesses the realizability of its deferred tax assets. If the Company concludes that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, the tax asset is reduced by a valuation allowance. Numerous judgments and assumptions are inherent in the determination of future taxable income, including factors such as future operating conditions (particularly as related to prevailing oil and gas prices) and changing tax laws.
Apache is required to assess whether the undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries will be permanently reinvested. In 2014, Apache evaluated its permanent reinvestment position and determined that undistributed earnings from certain subsidiaries located in Apaches Australia, Egypt, and North Sea regions will no longer be permanently reinvested. As a result of this change in position, Apache recorded a U.S. deferred income tax liability of $1.7 billion on the undistributed earnings of subsidiaries located in these regions. Apaches Canadian subsidiaries do not currently have undistributed earnings. Apache does not record U.S. deferred income taxes on foreign subsidiaries that are deemed to be permanently reinvested. When such earnings are no longer deemed permanently reinvested, Apache will recognize the appropriate U.S. current or deferred income tax liabilities. For more information, please refer to Note 7 Income Taxes.
Foreign Currency Transaction Gains and Losses
The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for each of Apaches international operations. The functional currency is determined country-by-country based on relevant facts and circumstances of the cash flows, commodity pricing environment and financing arrangements in each country. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses arise when monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are remeasured to their U.S. dollar equivalent at the exchange rate in effect at the end of each reporting period. Foreign currency gains and losses also arise when revenue and disbursement transactions denominated in a countrys local currency are converted to a U.S. dollar equivalent based on the average exchange rates during the reporting period.
F-15
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Foreign currency transaction gains and losses related to current taxes payable and deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded as components of the provision for income taxes. In 2014, Apache recorded a tax benefit of $56 million, including current and deferred taxes. In 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $154 million and a tax expense of $16 million, respectively. For further discussion, please refer to Note 7 Income Taxes. All other foreign currency transaction gains and losses are reflected in Other under Revenues and Other in the statement of consolidated operations. The Companys other foreign currency gains and losses netted to a gain in 2014 of $8 million, a loss in 2013 of $30 million, and a gain in 2012 of $24 million.
Insurance Coverage
The Company recognizes an insurance receivable when collection of the receivable is deemed probable. Any recognition of an insurance receivable is recorded by crediting and offsetting the original charge. Any differential arising between insurance recoveries and insurance receivables is recorded as a capitalized cost or as an expense, consistent with its original treatment.
Earnings Per Share
The Companys basic earnings per share (EPS) amounts have been computed based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects potential dilution, using the treasury stock method, which assumes that options were exercised and restricted stock was fully vested. The diluted EPS calculations for the year ended December 31, 2013, includes weighted-average shares of common stock from the assumed conversion of Apaches convertible preferred stock. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the diluted EPS calculation excludes shares related to the assumed conversion of the convertible preferred stock as such conversion would have been anti-dilutive.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the fair value recognition provisions of ASC Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation. The Company grants various types of stock-based awards including stock options, nonvested restricted stock units, and performance-based awards. Additionally, the Company also grants cash-based stock appreciation rights. These plans and related accounting policies are defined and described more fully in Note 10 Capital Stock. Stock compensation awards granted are valued on the date of grant and are expensed, net of estimated forfeitures, over the required service period.
ASC Topic 718 also requires that benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as financing cash flows rather than as operating cash flows. The Company classified $35,000, $1 million, and $4 million as financing cash inflows in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
Treasury Stock
The Company follows the weighted-average-cost method of accounting for treasury stock transactions.
New Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Adopted
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-08 Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. ASU 2014-08 modifies the criteria for disposals to qualify as discontinued operations and expands related disclosures. The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
F-16
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In May 2014, the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued a joint revenue recognition standard, ASU 2014-09. The new standard removes inconsistencies in existing standards, changes the way companies recognize revenue from contracts with customers, and increases disclosure requirements. The guidance requires companies to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The standard is required to be adopted using either the full retrospective approach, with all prior periods presented adjusted, or the modified retrospective approach, with a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings on the opening balance sheet. The Company is currently evaluating the level of effort needed to implement the standard, the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements, and whether to use the full retrospective approach or the modified retrospective approach.
2. ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
2014 Activity
LNG Projects Divestiture
In December 2014, Apache agreed to sell its interest in two LNG projects, Wheatstone LNG in Australia and Kitimat LNG in Canada, along with the associated upstream oil and gas assets, to Woodside Petroleum Limited for a purchase price of $2.75 billion plus recovery of Apaches net expenditure in the Wheatstone and Kitimat LNG projects between June 30, 2014, and closing. This transaction is subject to necessary government and regulatory approvals and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2015. Under the terms of the agreement, Apache will sell its equity ownership in its Australian subsidiary Apache Julimar Pty Ltd, which owns a 13 percent interest in the Wheatstone LNG project and a 65 percent interest in the WA-49-L block, which includes the Julimar/Brunello offshore gas fields and the Balnaves oil development. The transaction also includes the sale of Apaches entire interest in the Kitimat LNG plant, Pacific Trail Pipelines Limited Partnership (PTP) and related upstream acreage in the Horn River and Liard natural gas basins of British Columbia, Canada.
As a result of the announced sale of these projects, the LNG facilities and associated assets on Apaches consolidated balance sheet and Apaches investment in PTP qualify as held for sale as of December 31, 2014. A summary of the associated assets and liabilities classified as held for sale on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014, is detailed below:
December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||
Canada | Australia | Total | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||
Current assets |
$ | 30 | $ | | $ | 30 | ||||||
GTP assets, net of accumulated depreciation |
200 | 1,297 | 1,497 | |||||||||
Other long-term assets |
101 | | 101 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Assets held for sale(1) |
$ | 331 | $ | 1,297 | $ | 1,628 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
$ | 12 | $ | | $ | 12 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
7 | | 7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Liabilities held for sale(1) |
$ | 19 | $ | | $ | 19 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Assets held for sale are classified as current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Liabilities held for sale are recorded in Other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
F-17
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In connection with classifying these assets to held for sale, a separate impairment analysis was performed for each long-lived asset within the disposal group. The analysis was based on the estimated fair value of the assets in the disposal group, which was equivalent to the allocated purchase price associated with the transaction. The transactions purchase price was allocated based on the fair value of each asset in the disposal group. Each assets fair value was determined using a combination of the income approach, specifically discounted cash flows, and the cost approach. The income approach considered management views on current operating measures as well as assumptions pertaining to market forces in the oil and gas industry, such as future production, future commodity prices, and costs. These assumptions were applied to develop future cash flow projections that were then discounted to estimate fair value, using a discount rate believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants. The cost approach reflects the amount that would be required currently to replace the service capacity of an asset (often referred to as current replacement cost) and is typically used to measure the fair value of tangible assets that are used in combination with other assets. Apache has classified these non-recurring fair value measurements as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
The net book value of the assets associated with the Wheatstone LNG and Kitimat LNG projects totaled approximately $1.7 billion and $712 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2014. The estimated fair value of these assets as of year-end was less than the carrying value, resulting in an impairment loss during the fourth quarter of $930 million. The carrying value of Apaches investment in PTP was approximately $205 million with an estimated fair value of $101 million. Combined, Apache recognized an impairment loss on held for sale assets totaling $1.0 billion ($753 million net of tax). These impairments of assets held for sale have been recorded in Impairments in the Companys statement of consolidated operations.
The upstream oil and natural gas properties associated with this sale are not presented as held for sale pursuant to the rules governing full cost accounting for oil and gas properties. Approximately $1.3 billion and $400 million of proceeds have been allocated to the Australia and Canada upstream assets, respectively. Apache expects to incur a loss on the sale of Australia upstream assets when the transaction closes during first quarter of 2015, as sold reserves are expected to represent greater than 25 percent of the Companys Australian reserve quantities.
Anadarko Basin and Southern Louisiana Divestitures
In December 2014, Apache completed the sale of certain Anadarko basin and non-core southern Louisiana oil and gas assets for approximately $1.3 billion in two separate transactions. In the Anadarko basin, Apache sold approximately 115,000 net acres in Wheeler County, Texas, and western Oklahoma. In southern Louisiana, Apache sold its working interest in approximately 90,000 net acres. The effective date of both of these transactions is October 1, 2014. Apaches net book value of oil and gas properties was reduced by approximately $1.2 billion of proved property costs as a result of the transactions. Approximately $72 million of proceeds were allocated to the GTP facilities, resulting in a loss on disposal of assets totaling $180 million ($116 million net of tax).
Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Divestiture
On June 30, 2014, Apache completed the sale of non-operated interests in the Lucius and Heidelberg development projects and 11 primary-term deepwater exploration blocks in the Gulf of Mexico for $1.4 billion. The effective date of the transaction was May 1, 2014. Apaches net book value of oil and gas properties was reduced by $850 million of proved property costs and $518 million of unproved property costs as a result of the transaction.
F-18
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Canada Divestiture
On April 30, 2014, Apache completed the sale of primarily dry gas producing hydrocarbon assets in the Deep Basin area of western Alberta and British Columbia, Canada, for $374 million. The assets comprise 328,400 net acres in the Ojay, Noel, and Wapiti areas. Apache retained 100 percent of its working interest in horizons below the Cretaceous in the Wapiti area, including rights to the liquids-rich Montney and other deeper horizons. The effective date of the transaction was January 1, 2014.
Argentina Divestiture
On March 12, 2014, Apaches subsidiaries completed the sale of all of the Companys operations in Argentina to YPF Sociedad Anónima for cash consideration of $800 million (subject to customary closing adjustments) plus the assumption of $52 million of bank debt as of June 30, 2013. The results of operations related to Argentina have been classified as discontinued operations in all periods presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities associated with the disposition were as follows:
Sales and other operating revenues and loss from discontinued operations related to the Argentina disposition were as follows:
For the Year Ended
December 31, |
||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Revenues and other from discontinued operations |
$ | 87 | $ | 494 | $ | 514 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Loss from Argentina divestiture |
(539 | ) | | | ||||||||
Income (loss) from operations in Argentina |
(1 | ) | (192 | ) | 14 | |||||||
Income tax benefit |
23 | | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
$ | (517 | ) | $ | (192 | ) | $ | 14 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Leasehold Acquisitions
During 2014, Apache completed $1.3 billion of leasehold acquisitions, substantially increasing its drilling opportunities in key focus areas in North America including the Eagle Ford and Canyon Lime plays.
2013 Activity
Egypt Partnership
On November 14, 2013, Apache completed the sale of a one-third minority participation in its Egypt oil and gas business to a subsidiary of Sinopec International Petroleum Exploration and Production Corporation (Sinopec). Apache received cash consideration of $2.95 billion after customary closing adjustments. Apache continues to operate its Egypt upstream oil and gas business. Apache recorded $1.9 billion of the proceeds as a non-controlling interest, which is reflected as a separate component of equity in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. This represents one-third of Apaches net book value of its Egypt holdings at the time of the transaction. The remaining proceeds were recorded as additional paid-in capital. Included in Net income including noncontrolling interest for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, is net income attributable to Sinopecs interest totaling $343 million and $56 million, respectively, of which the Company distributed approximately $140 million to Sinopec during 2014.
Gulf of Mexico Shelf Divestiture
On September 30, 2013, Apache completed the sale of its Gulf of Mexico Shelf operations and properties to Fieldwood Energy LLC (Fieldwood), an affiliate of Riverstone Holdings. Under the terms of the agreement, Apache received cash consideration of $3.7 billion, and Fieldwood assumed $1.5 billion of discounted asset abandonment liabilities. Additionally, Apache retained 50 percent of its ownership interest in all exploration blocks and in horizons below production in developed blocks. The effective date of the agreement is July 1, 2013. Apaches net book value of oil and gas properties was reduced by approximately $4.6 billion of proved property costs and $473 million of unproved property costs as a result of the transaction.
Canada LNG Project
In February 2013, Apache completed a transaction with Chevron Canada Limited (Chevron Canada) under which each company became a 50 percent owner of the Kitimat LNG plant, the Pacific Trail Pipelines Limited Partnership, and 644,000 gross undeveloped acres in the Horn River and Liard basins. Apaches net proceeds from the transaction were $396 million after post-closing adjustments, and no gain or loss was recorded.
Leasehold Acquisitions
During 2013, Apache completed $215 million of leasehold acquisitions in North America.
2012 Activity
Cordillera Energy Partners III, LLC Acquisition
On April 30, 2012, Apache completed the acquisition of Cordillera Energy Partners III, LLC (Cordillera), a privately-held exploration and production company, in a stock and cash transaction. Cordilleras properties included approximately 312,000 net acres in the Granite Wash, Tonkawa, Cleveland, and Marmaton plays in western Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle.
F-20
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Apache issued 6,272,667 shares of common stock and paid approximately $2.7 billion of cash to the sellers as consideration for the transaction. The transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, which requires, among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date.
Yara Pilbara Holdings Pty Limited Acquisition
On January 31, 2012, a subsidiary of Apache Energy Limited completed the acquisition of a 49 percent interest in Yara Pilbara Holdings Pty Limited (YPHPL, formerly Burrup Holdings Limited) for $439 million, including working capital adjustments. The transaction was funded with debt. Yara Australia Pty Ltd (Yara) owns the remaining 51 percent of YPHPL and operates the plant. The investment in YPHPL is accounted for under the equity method of accounting, with the balance recorded as a component of Deferred charges and other in Apaches consolidated balance sheet and results of operations recorded as a component of Other under Revenues and other in the Companys statement of consolidated operations.
Leasehold Acquisitions
During 2012, Apache completed $1.1 billion of leasehold acquisitions primarily in new and existing North American plays.
Acquisition, Divestiture and Separation Costs
Apache recorded $67 million and $33 million of expenses during 2014 and 2013, respectively, primarily related to separation costs, investment banking fees and other costs associated with recent divestitures. In 2012, the Company recorded $31 million of expenses reflecting costs related to our acquisition of Mobil North Sea and our acquisition of Cordillera.
3. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Objectives and Strategies
The Company is exposed to fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas prices on the majority of its worldwide production. Apache manages the variability in its cash flows by occasionally entering into derivative transactions on a portion of its crude oil and natural gas production. When appropriate, the Company utilizes various types of derivative financial instruments, including swaps and options, to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from changes in commodity prices. As of December 31, 2014, Apache had no open commodity derivative positions.
Counterparty Risk
The use of derivative instruments exposes the Company to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty. As such, the Company executes commodity derivative transactions under master agreements that have netting provisions that provide for offsetting payables against receivables. Additionally, if a party incurs a material deterioration in its credit ratings, as defined in the applicable agreement, the other party has the right to demand the posting of collateral, demand a transfer, or terminate the arrangement. The Companys net derivative liability position at December 31, 2013, represented the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position.
F-21
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Derivative Activity Recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
All derivative instruments are reflected as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet. These fair values are recorded by netting asset and liability positions where counterparty master netting arrangements contain provisions for net settlement. The fair market value of the Companys derivative assets and liabilities and their locations on the consolidated balance sheet are as follows:
December 31,
2014 |
December 31,
2013 |
|||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Current Assets: Prepaid assets and other |
$ | | $ | 1 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Assets |
$ | | $ | 1 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Current Liabilities: Derivative instruments |
$ | | $ | 299 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Liabilities |
$ | | $ | 299 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Derivative Activity Recorded in the Statement of Consolidated Operations
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments on the Companys statement of consolidated operations:
Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedges reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
Oil and Gas Production Revenues | $ | | $ | (16 | ) | $ | 268 | ||||||
Loss for ineffectiveness on cash flow hedges |
Revenues and Other: Other | $ | | $ | (1 | ) | $ | | ||||||
Derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges: Realized Loss |
$ | (16 | ) | $ | (178 | ) | $ | | ||||||
Unrealized Gain (loss) |
300 | (221 | ) | (79 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gain (loss) on derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges |
Derivative instrument gains (losses), net | $ | 284 | $ | (399 | ) | $ | (79 | ) |
Unrealized gains and losses for derivative activity recorded in the statement of consolidated operations is reflected in the statement of consolidated cash flows as a component of Other in Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities.
Derivative Activity in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
A reconciliation of the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the statement of consolidated changes in equity related to Apaches derivatives designated as cash flow hedges is presented in the table below:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Before
tax |
After
tax |
Before
tax |
After
tax |
Before
tax |
After
tax |
|||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives at beginning of year |
$ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 145 | $ | 114 | ||||||||||
Realized amounts reclassified into earnings |
| | 16 | 11 | (268 | ) | (199 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net change in derivative fair value |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (6 | ) | (5 | ) | 113 | 79 | ||||||||||||||
Ineffectiveness reclassified into earnings |
| | 1 | 1 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives at end of period |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
The following table provides detail of the Companys other current liabilities at December 31, 2014 and 2013:
December 31, | ||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Accrued operating expenses |
$ | 163 | $ | 190 | ||||
Accrued exploration and development |
1,606 | 1,582 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
204 | 242 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
160 | 161 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes |
54 | 248 | ||||||
Other |
230 | 188 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Other current liabilities |
$ | 2,417 | $ | 2,611 | ||||
|
|
|
|
5. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION
The following table describes changes to the Companys asset retirement obligation (ARO) liability for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Asset retirement obligation at beginning of year |
$ | 3,222 | $ | 4,578 | ||||
Liabilities incurred |
171 | 481 | ||||||
Liabilities acquired |
| 53 | ||||||
Liabilities divested |
(471 | ) | (1,692 | ) | ||||
Liabilities settled |
(146 | ) | (497 | ) | ||||
Accretion expense |
181 | 243 | ||||||
Revisions in estimated liabilities |
128 | 56 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Asset retirement obligation at end of year |
3,085 | 3,222 | ||||||
Less current portion |
(37 | ) | (121 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Asset retirement obligation, long-term |
$ | 3,048 | $ | 3,101 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The ARO liability reflects the estimated present value of the amount of dismantlement, removal, site reclamation, and similar activities associated with Apaches oil and gas properties. The Company utilizes current retirement costs to estimate the expected cash outflows for retirement obligations. The Company estimates the ultimate productive life of the properties, a risk-adjusted discount rate, and an inflation factor in order to determine the current present value of this obligation. To the extent future revisions to these assumptions impact the present value of the existing ARO liability, a corresponding adjustment is made to the oil and gas property balance.
Accretion expense for 2013 includes Argentina discontinued operations of $5 million, which is included in Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax.
During 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded $171 million and $481 million, respectively, in abandonment liabilities resulting from Apaches active exploration and development capital program. Liabilities settled primarily relate to individual properties, platforms, and facilities plugged and abandoned during the period.
F-23
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
6. DEBT
Overview
All of the Companys debt is senior unsecured debt and has equal priority with respect to the payment of both principal and interest. The indentures for the notes described below place certain restrictions on the Company, including limits on Apaches ability to incur debt secured by certain liens and its ability to enter into certain sale and leaseback transactions. Upon certain changes in control, all of these debt instruments would be subject to mandatory repurchase, at the option of the holders. None of the indentures for the notes contain prepayment obligations in the event of a decline in credit ratings.
The following table presents the carrying value of the Companys debt at December 31, 2014 and 2013:
December 31, | ||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
U.S.: |
||||||||
Commercial paper |
1,570 | | ||||||
5.625% notes due 2017(1) |
500 | 500 | ||||||
1.75% notes due 2017(1) |
400 | 400 | ||||||
6.9% notes due 2018(1) |
400 | 400 | ||||||
7.0% notes due 2018 |
150 | 150 | ||||||
7.625% notes due 2019 |
150 | 150 | ||||||
3.625% notes due 2021(1) |
500 | 500 | ||||||
3.25% notes due 2022(1) |
919 | 919 | ||||||
2.625% notes due 2023(1) |
531 | 531 | ||||||
7.7% notes due 2026 |
100 | 100 | ||||||
7.95% notes due 2026 |
180 | 180 | ||||||
6.0% notes due 2037(1) |
1,000 | 1,000 | ||||||
5.1% notes due 2040(1) |
1,500 | 1,500 | ||||||
5.25% notes due 2042(1) |
500 | 500 | ||||||
4.75% notes due 2043(1) |
1,500 | 1,500 | ||||||
4.25% notes due 2044(1) |
800 | 800 | ||||||
7.375% debentures due 2047 |
150 | 150 | ||||||
7.625% debentures due 2096 |
150 | 150 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
11,000 | 9,430 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Subsidiary and other obligations: |
||||||||
Argentina overdraft lines of credit |
| 51 | ||||||
Canada lines of credit |
| 2 | ||||||
Notes due in 2016 and 2017 |
1 | 1 | ||||||
Apache Finance Canada 7.75% notes due 2029 |
300 | 300 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
301 | 354 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Debt before unamortized discount |
11,301 | 9,784 | ||||||
Unamortized discount |
(56 | ) | (59 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total debt |
$ | 11,245 | $ | 9,725 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Current maturities |
$ | | $ | (53 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 11,245 | $ | 9,672 | ||||
|
|
|
|
(1) |
These notes are redeemable, as a whole or in part, at Apaches option, subject to a make-whole premium. The remaining notes and debentures are not redeemable. |
F-24
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Debt maturities as of December 31, 2014, excluding discounts, are as follows:
(In millions) | ||||
2017 |
$ | 901 | ||
2018 |
2,120 | |||
2019 |
150 | |||
Thereafter |
8,130 | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
Total Debt, excluding discounts |
$ | 11,301 | ||
|
|
Fair Value
The Companys debt is recorded at the carrying amount, net of unamortized discount, on its consolidated balance sheet. The carrying amount of the Companys commercial paper and uncommitted credit facilities and overdraft lines approximate fair value because the interest rates are variable and reflective of market rates. Apache uses a market approach to determine the fair value of its fixed-rate debt using estimates provided by an independent investment financial data services firm (a Level 2 fair value measurement).
December 31, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying
Amount |
Fair
Value |
Carrying
Amount |
Fair
Value |
|||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Money market lines of credit |
$ | | $ | | $ | 53 | $ | 53 | ||||||||
Commercial paper |
1,570 | 1,570 | | | ||||||||||||
Notes and debentures |
9,675 | 9,944 | 9,672 | 10,247 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Debt |
$ | 11,245 | $ | 11,514 | $ | 9,725 | $ | 10,300 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market and Overdraft Lines of Credit
The Company has certain uncommitted money market and overdraft lines of credit that are used from time to time for working capital purposes. As of December 31, 2014, there was no outstanding balance on Apaches lines of credit. As of December 31, 2013, a total of $2 million was drawn on facilities in Canada and $51 million in Argentina.
Unsecured Committed Bank Credit Facilities
As of December 31, 2014, the Company had unsecured committed revolving syndicated bank credit facilities totaling $5.3 billion, of which $2.0 billion matures in December 2015, $1.0 billion matures in August 2016, and $2.3 billion matures in June 2018 pursuant to a one-year extension approved in May 2014 under the terms of the $2.3 billion facilities.
In December 2014, the Company entered into a $2.0 billion 364-day revolving credit facility which matures in December 2015. At maturity, the 364-day credit facility allows the Company to convert the outstanding revolving loans into one-year term loans by paying a term-out fee of 1 percent. Proceeds from borrowings may be used for general corporate purposes. Apaches available borrowing capacity under this facility and its other committed credit facilities support its commercial paper program which was increased from $3.0 billion to $5.0 billion in December 2014. The facilities consist of a $2.0 billion 364-day credit facility, $1.7 billion facility and $1.0 billion facility in the U.S., a $300 million facility in Australia, and a $300 million facility in Canada. As of December 31, 2014, aggregate available borrowing capacity under the Companys credit facilities was $3.7 billion.
F-25
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
At the Companys option, the interest rate for the facilities is based on a base rate, as defined, or the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin determined by the Companys senior long-term debt rating. The $1.7 billion credit facility also allows the Company to borrow under competitive auctions.
At December 31, 2014, the margin over LIBOR for committed loans was 0.925 percent on the $2.0 billion 364-day credit facility, 0.875 percent on the $1.0 billion U.S. credit facility, and 0.90 percent on each of the $1.7 billion U.S. credit facility, the $300 million Australian credit facility, and the $300 million Canadian credit facility. The Company also pays quarterly facility fees of 0.075 percent on the total amount of the $2.0 billion 364-day credit facility, 0.125 percent on the total amount of the $1.0 billion U.S. facility, and 0.10 percent on the total amount of the other three facilities. The margin over LIBOR and the facility fees vary based upon the Companys senior long-term debt rating.
The financial covenants of the credit facilities require the Company to maintain a debt-to-capitalization ratio of not greater than 60 percent at the end of any fiscal quarter. At December 31, 2014, the Companys debt-to-capitalization ratio was 29 percent.
The negative covenants include restrictions on the Companys ability to create liens and security interests on its assets, with exceptions for liens typically arising in the oil and gas industry, purchase money liens, and liens arising as a matter of law, such as tax and mechanics liens. The Company may incur liens on assets located in the U.S. and Canada of up to 5 percent of the Companys consolidated assets, or approximately $2.8 billion as of December 31, 2014. There are no restrictions on incurring liens in countries other than the U.S. and Canada. There are also restrictions on Apaches ability to merge with another entity, unless the Company is the surviving entity, and a restriction on its ability to guarantee debt of entities not within its consolidated group.
The facilities do not permit the lenders to accelerate payments or refuse to lend based on unspecified material adverse changes. The credit facility agreements do not have drawdown restrictions or prepayment obligations in the event of a decline in credit ratings. However, the agreements allow the lenders to accelerate payments and terminate lending commitments if Apache, or any of its U.S. or Canadian subsidiaries, defaults on any direct payment obligation in excess of the stated thresholds noted in the agreements or has any unpaid, non-appealable judgment against it in excess of the stated thresholds noted in the agreements.
The Company was in compliance with the terms of the credit facilities as of December 31, 2014.
Commercial Paper Program
In December 2014, the Company increased its commercial paper program from $3.0 billion to $5.0 billion. The commercial paper program generally enables Apache to borrow funds for up to 270 days at competitive interest rates. The commercial paper program is fully supported by available borrowing capacity under committed credit facilities. Our 2014 weighted-average interest rate for commercial paper was 0.31 percent. If the Company is unable to issue commercial paper following a significant credit downgrade or dislocation in the market, the Companys committed credit facilities, which expire in 2015, 2016, and 2018, are available as a 100 percent backstop. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had $1.6 billion in commercial paper outstanding. At December 31, 2013, the Company had no commercial paper outstanding.
F-26
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Subsidiary Notes Apache Finance Canada
Apache Finance Canada has approximately $300 million of publicly traded notes due in 2029 that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Apache. For further discussion of subsidiary debt, please see Note 16 Supplemental Guarantor Information.
Financing Costs, Net
The following table presents the components of Apaches financing costs, net:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 499 | $ | 560 | $ | 501 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred loan costs |
6 | 8 | 7 | |||||||||
Capitalized interest |
(363 | ) | (364 | ) | (323 | ) | ||||||
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
| (16 | ) | | ||||||||
Interest income |
(12 | ) | (11 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Financing costs, net |
$ | 130 | $ | 177 | $ | 172 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2014, the Company has $56 million of debt discounts, which will be charged to interest expense over the life of the related debt issuances. Discount amortization of $3 million was recorded as interest expense in each of 2014, 2013, and 2012.
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had approximately $69 million and $73 million, respectively, of unamortized deferred loan costs associated with its various debt obligations. These costs are included in deferred charges and other in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and are being charged to financing costs and expensed over the life of the related debt issuances.
7. INCOME TAXES
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes is composed of the following:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
U.S. |
$ | (4,020 | ) | $ | 1,191 | $ | 1,605 | |||||
Foreign |
1,114 | 3,213 | 3,235 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | (2,906 | ) | $ | 4,404 | $ | 4,840 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The total provision for income taxes from continuing operations consists of the following:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Current taxes: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | (10 | ) | $ | (29 | ) | $ | (150 | ) | |||
State |
1 | | | |||||||||
Foreign |
1,151 | 1,692 | 2,349 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
1,142 | 1,663 | 2,199 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Deferred taxes: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
961 | 509 | 596 | |||||||||
State |
(43 | ) | 44 | 10 | ||||||||
Foreign |
(423 | ) | (292 | ) | 48 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
495 | 261 | 654 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 1,637 | $ | 1,924 | $ | 2,853 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total provision for income taxes differs from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. statutory income tax rate to income (loss) before income taxes. A reconciliation of the tax on the Companys income from continuing operations before income taxes and total tax expense is shown below:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) at U.S. statutory rate |
$ | (1,017 | ) | $ | 1,541 | $ | 1,694 | |||||
State income tax, less federal benefit |
(27 | ) | 29 | 6 | ||||||||
Taxes related to foreign operations |
(144 | ) | 200 | 767 | ||||||||
Tax credits |
| 6 | (4 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred tax on distributed foreign earnings |
311 | 225 | | |||||||||
Deferred tax on undistributed foreign earnings |
1,654 | | | |||||||||
Current and deferred taxes related to currency fluctuations |
(56 | ) | (154 | ) | 16 | |||||||
Goodwill impairment |
483 | | | |||||||||
Change in U.K. tax rate |
| | 118 | |||||||||
Net change in tax contingencies |
(3 | ) | (10 | ) | (115 | ) | ||||||
Valuation allowances |
478 | 132 | 341 | |||||||||
All other, net |
(42 | ) | (45 | ) | 30 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
$ | 1,637 | $ | 1,924 | $ | 2,853 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The deferred net income tax liability reflects the net tax impact of timing differences between the assets and liability amounts carried on the books under the U.S. GAAP method of accounting and amounts utilized for income tax purposes. The net deferred income tax liability consists of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Deferred income |
$ | | $ | 153 | ||||
U.S. and state net operating loss carryforwards |
1,333 | 900 | ||||||
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards |
366 | 156 | ||||||
Tax credits |
42 | 66 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and liabilities |
68 | 162 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligation |
1,202 | 1,231 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total deferred tax assets |
3,011 | 2,668 | ||||||
Valuation allowance |
(1,069 | ) | (651 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net deferred tax assets |
1,942 | 2,017 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Other |
19 | 29 | ||||||
Deferred income |
24 | | ||||||
Investment in foreign subsidiaries |
1,654 | | ||||||
Property and equipment |
8,986 | 10,224 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
10,683 | 10,253 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net deferred income tax liability |
$ | 8,741 | $ | 8,236 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the consolidated balance sheet as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Deferred tax asset |
$ | (769 | ) | $ | (134 | ) | ||
Deferred charges and other |
(17 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Other current liabilities |
28 | 39 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
9,499 | 8,364 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net deferred income tax liability |
$ | 8,741 | $ | 8,236 | ||||
|
|
|
|
F-29
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has recorded a valuation allowance against certain foreign net deferred tax assets, and against certain state net operating losses. The Company has assessed the future potential realization of these deferred tax assets and has concluded that it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be realized based on current economic conditions and expectations for the future. In 2014, 2013, and 2012, the Company increased its valuation allowance by $418 million, $232 million, and $359 million, as detailed in the table below:
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 651 | $ | 419 | $ | 60 | ||||||
State(1) |
57 | 32 | 7 | |||||||||
Foreign |
478 | 132 | 341 | |||||||||
Discontinued operations(2) |
(117 | ) | 68 | 11 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | 1,069 | $ | 651 | $ | 419 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Reported as a component of state income taxes in the tax reconciliation. |
(2) |
In 2014, Apaches subsidiaries completed the sale of all of the Companys operations in Argentina. As such, the deferred tax assets, liabilities, and valuation allowance for Argentina were removed for 2014. |
In the third quarter of 2014, Apache evaluated its permanent reinvestment position and determined that undistributed earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries located in Apaches Australia, Egypt, and North Sea regions will no longer be permanently reinvested. As a result of this change in position, the Company recorded $1.7 billion of U.S. deferred income tax expense on undistributed earnings that were previously considered permanently reinvested. In addition, the Company recorded $311 million and $225 million of U.S. deferred income tax expense on foreign earnings that were distributed to the U.S. in 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Companys Canadian subsidiaries do not currently have undistributed earnings.
On December 31, 2014, the Company had net operating losses as follows:
December 31, 2014 | ||||||
Amount | Expiration | |||||
(In millions) | ||||||
Net operating losses: |
||||||
U.S. Federal |
$ | 2,701 | 2032 - 2035 | |||
U.S. Federal (Mariner IRC §382 limited) |
464 | 2018 - 2030 | ||||
U.S. Federal (Cordillera IRC §382 limited) |
183 | 2027 - 2032 | ||||
U.S. State |
3,273 | Various | ||||
Canada |
5 | 2015 | ||||
Australia |
124 | Indefinite |
The Company has a U.S. net operating loss carryforward of $3.3 billion. Included in the U.S. net operating loss carryforward is $464 million of federal net operating losses related to the 2010 merger with Mariner Energy, Inc. (Mariner) and $183 million of federal net operating losses related to the Cordillera acquisition. The Mariner and Cordillera net operating loss carryforwards are subject to annual limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company also has $123 million of capital loss carryforwards in Canada, which have an indefinite carryover period.
The tax benefits of net operating loss carryforwards are recorded as assets to the extent that management assesses the utilization of such carryforwards to be more likely than not. When the future utilization of some portion of the carryforwards is determined to not meet the more likely than not standard, a valuation allowance is provided to reduce the tax benefits from such assets.
F-30
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, which prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a tax position must meet before being recognized in the financial statements. Tax positions generally refer to a position taken in a previously filed income tax return or expected to be included in a tax return to be filed in the future that is reflected in the measurement of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 3 | $ | 3 | $ | 97 | ||||||
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
| | 4 | |||||||||
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
(3 | ) | | (33 | ) | |||||||
Settlements with taxing authorities |
| | (65 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | | $ | 3 | $ | 3 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. Each quarter the Company assesses the amounts provided for and, as a result, may increase (expense) or reduce (benefit) the amount of interest and penalties. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 the Company recorded tax benefit of $1 million, tax expense of $1 million, and tax expense of $5 million, respectively, for interest and penalties. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had approximately $1 million accrued for payment of interest and penalties and nothing was accrued as of December 31, 2014.
In 2014, the Internal Revenue Service concluded its audit of the 2011 and 2012 tax years. The Company reduced its unrecognized tax benefit by $3 million as a result of the conclusion of this audit. In 2013, the Company reached agreement with the IRS regarding an audit of the 2009 and 2010 tax years. There was no change in the Companys unrecognized tax benefits as a result of this agreement. In 2012, the Company reached agreement with IRS Administrative Appeals office regarding the audits of tax years 2004 through 2008. As a result of this agreement, the Company reduced its unrecognized tax benefits by $65 million. The resolution of unagreed tax issues in the Companys open tax years cannot be predicted with absolute certainty, and differences between what has been recorded and the eventual outcomes may occur. The Company believes that it has adequately provided for income taxes and any related interest and penalties for all open tax years.
Apache and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax in various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Companys uncertain tax positions are related to tax years that may be subject to examination by the relevant taxing authority. Apaches earliest open tax years in its key jurisdictions are as follows:
Jurisdiction |
||||
U.S.(1) |
2011 | |||
Canada |
2010 | |||
Egypt |
1998 | |||
Australia |
2007 | |||
U.K. |
2010 |
(1) |
Mariners tax returns for 1998 through 2010 remain open for purposes of determining its net operating loss. Cordilleras tax returns for 2005 through 2012 remain open for purposes of determining its net operating loss. |
F-31
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Matters
Apache is party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, including litigation and governmental and regulatory controls. The Company has an accrued liability of approximately $8 million for all legal contingencies that are deemed to be probable of occurring and can be reasonably estimated. Apaches estimates are based on information known about the matters and its experience in contesting, litigating, and settling similar matters. Although actual amounts could differ from managements estimate, none of the actions are believed by management to involve future amounts that would be material to Apaches financial position, results of operations, or liquidity after consideration of recorded accruals. For material matters that Apache believes an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible, the Company has disclosed the nature of the matter and a range of potential exposure, unless an estimate cannot be made at this time. It is managements opinion that the loss for any other litigation matters and claims that are reasonably possible to occur will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
Argentine Claims
On March 12, 2014, the Company and its subsidiaries completed the sale of all of the Companys subsidiaries operations and properties in Argentina to YPF Sociedad Anonima (YPF). As part of that sale, YPF assumed responsibility for all of the past, present, and future litigation in Argentina involving Company subsidiaries, except that Company subsidiaries have agreed to indemnify YPF for certain environmental, tax, and royalty obligations capped at an aggregate of $100 million. The indemnity is subject to specific agreed conditions precedent, thresholds, contingencies, limitations, claim deadlines, loss sharing, and other terms and conditions. On April 11, 2014, YPF provided its first notice of claims pursuant to the indemnity. Company subsidiaries have not paid any amounts under the indemnity but will continue to review and consider claims presented by YPF. Further, Company subsidiaries retain the right to enforce certain Argentina-related indemnification obligations against Pioneer Natural Resources Company (Pioneer) in an amount up to $67.5 million pursuant to the terms and conditions of stock purchase agreements entered in 2006 between Company subsidiaries and subsidiaries of Pioneer.
Louisiana Restoration
Numerous surface owners have filed claims or sent demand letters to various oil and gas companies, including Apache, claiming that, under either expressed or implied lease terms or Louisiana law, they are liable for damages measured by the cost of restoration of leased premises to their original condition as well as damages from contamination and cleanup, regardless of the value of the underlying property. From time-to-time restoration lawsuits and claims are resolved by the Company for amounts that are not material to the Company, while new lawsuits and claims are asserted against the Company. With respect to each of the pending lawsuits and claims, the amount claimed is not currently determinable or is not material. The overall exposure related to these lawsuits and claims is not currently determinable. While an adverse judgment against Apache is possible, Apache intends to actively defend the cases.
On July 24, 2013, a lawsuit captioned Board of Commissioners of the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority East v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company et al. , Case No. 2013-6911 was filed in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana, in which plaintiff on behalf of itself and as the board governing the levee districts of Orleans, Lake Borgne Basin, and East Jefferson alleges that Louisiana coastal lands have been damaged as a result of oil and gas industry activity, including a network of canals for access and pipelines. Plaintiff seeks damages and injunctive relief in the form of abatement and restoration based on claims of negligence, strict liability, natural servitude of drain, public nuisance, private nuisance, and breach of contract
F-32
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
third party beneficiary. Apache has been indiscriminately named as one of approximately 100 defendants in the lawsuit. Defendant Chevron U.S.A., Inc. filed a notice to remove the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, civil action No. 13-5410. The federal court has retained jurisdiction over the matter after denying plaintiffs motion to remand on June 27, 2014. Further, in 2014 the Louisiana state government passed a law (SB 469) clarifying that only entities authorized under the Coastal Zone Management Act may bring litigation to assert claims arising out of the permitted activities. Plaintiff is not one of those authorized entities. On February 13, 2015, the federal court entered judgment in favor of defendants dismissing all of plaintiffs claims with prejudice on various grounds, subject to appeal. The overall exposure related to this lawsuit is not currently determinable. While an adverse judgment against Apache might be possible, Apache intends to continue to vigorously oppose the claims, including by defending against any appeal of the trial courts judgment.
On November 8, 2013, the Parish of Plaquemines in Louisiana filed three lawsuits against the Company and other oil and gas producers alleging that certain of defendants oil and gas exploration, production, and transportation operations in specified fields were conducted in violation of the State and Local Coastal Resources Management Act of 1978, as amended, and applicable regulations, rules, orders, and ordinances promulgated or adopted thereunder by the State of Louisiana or the Parish of Plaquemines. Plaintiff alleges that defendants caused substantial damage to land and water bodies located in the coastal zone of Louisiana. Plaintiff seeks, among other things, unspecified damages for alleged violations of applicable state law within the coastal zone, the payment of costs necessary to clear, re-vegetate, detoxify, and otherwise restore the subject coastal zone as near as practicable to its original condition, and actual restoration of the coastal zone to its original condition. The lawsuits were all filed in Division A of the 25 th Judicial District Court for the Parish of Plaquemines, State of Louisiana, and are captioned as follows: Parish of Plaquemines v. Rozel Operating Company et al., Docket No. 60-996; Parish of Plaquemines v. Apache Oil Corporation et al., Docket No. 61-000; and Parish of Plaquemines v. HHE Energy Company et al., Docket No. 60-983. Defendants filed notices to remove the cases to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, civil action Nos. 13-6722, 13-6711, and 13-6735. However, plaintiffs motions to remand were granted in civil action Nos. 13-6722 and 13-6711. Many similar lawsuits have been filed against other oil and gas producers in the Parish of Plaquemines and in other Parishes across south Louisiana. The overall exposure related to these lawsuits is not currently determinable. While an adverse judgment against Apache might be possible, Apache intends to vigorously oppose the claims.
Australia Gas Pipeline Force Majeure
In June 2008, Company subsidiaries reported a pipeline explosion in Western Australia that interrupted deliveries of natural gas to customers under various long-term contracts. Company subsidiaries believe that the event was a force majeure, and as a result, the subsidiaries and their joint venture participants declared force majeure under those contracts.
On March 24, 2011, natural gas customer Alcoa of Australia Limited (Alcoa) filed a lawsuit captioned Alcoa of Australia Limited vs. Apache Energy Limited, Apache Northwest Pty Ltd, Tap (Harriet) Pty Ltd, and Kufpec Australia Pty Ltd , Civ. 1481 of 2011, in the Supreme Court of Western Australia. Exclusive of interest and costs, Alcoa seeks approximately $158 million AUD for alleged economic losses in tort or, alternatively, contractual liquidated damages in the amount of approximately $5.7 million AUD.
A lawsuit filed by natural gas customer Burrup Fertilisers Pty Ltd (Burrup Fertilisers) in Texas in December 2009 was dismissed in March 2013 on the ground of forum non conveniens . On May 29, 2014, Yara Pilbara Fertilisers Pty Ltd (YPFPL, formerly Burrup Fertilisers) re-filed the lawsuit in Western Australia, captioned Yara Pilbara Fertilisers Pty Ltd vs. Apache Energy Limited & Ors, Civ. 1742 of 2014, in the Supreme Court of Western Australia. Exclusive of interest and costs, YPFPL seeks nearly $166 million USD for alleged economic losses in tort or, alternatively, contractual liquidated damages in the amount of approximately $13 million USD.
F-33
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Six additional lawsuits concerning the pipeline explosion were filed in the Supreme Court of Western Australia prior to expiration of the applicable six-year limitations period on June 3, 2014. Plaintiffs are Iluka Resources Limited (Civ. 1748 of 2014), Barrick (Plutonic) Limited (Civ. 2656 of 2013), Newmont Mining Services Pty Ltd and certain of its affiliates (Civ. 1727 of 2014), EDL LNG (WA) Pty Ltd and an affiliate (Civ. 1751 of 2014), Wesfarmers LPG Pty Ltd and certain of its affiliates (Civ. 1740 of 2014), and Harvey Industries Group Pty Ltd (Civ. 1749 of 2014). The Iluka, Newmont, Wesfarmers, and Harvey plaintiffs have filed a short form of pleading that has not been served on the Apache defendants. Each plaintiff seeks to recover alleged economic losses in tort, including for lost production at their own facilities and/or replacement energy costs, and in the alternative contractual liquidated damages from Company subsidiaries (in the case of the EDL LNG plaintiffs) or Santos (BOL) Pty Ltd (in the case of the EDL LNG and Newmont plaintiffs). The amount of economic losses claimed in tort totals approximately $100 million AUD exclusive of interest and costs, and the amount of liquidated damages sought is not material.
The civil lawsuits are being pressed by plaintiffs subrogated insurers seeking relief primarily in tort, in circumvention of plaintiffs own positive arrangements regarding risk allocation and in contravention of the High Courts October 8, 2014, decision in Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v. Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288 & Anor , [2014] HCA 36 and the Victoria Supreme Courts decision in Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v. Esso Australia Pty Ltd [2003] VSC 27.
Contract prices under customer contracts were significantly below prices for natural gas in Australia during the force majeure period. In the event it is determined that the pipeline explosion was not a force majeure, Company subsidiaries believe that liquidated damages should be the extent of the damages under those long-term contracts with such provisions. Approximately 90 percent of the natural gas volumes sold by Company subsidiaries under long-term contracts have liquidated damages provisions. In respect of plaintiffs that filed claims prior to expiration of the six-year limitations period, contractual liquidated damages under the long-term contracts with such provisions would not be expected to exceed $20 million USD exclusive of interest. While an adverse judgment is possible against Company subsidiaries on the plaintiffs breach of contract and duty of care claims (and against the Company to the extent of liquidated damages, in the case of YPFPL), the Company and Company subsidiaries do not believe any of the claims have merit and will vigorously pursue their defenses against such claims. Further, Company subsidiaries have received confirmation of liability insurance coverage from their primary and excess insurers.
Escheat Audits
The State of Delaware, Department of Finance, Division of Revenue (Unclaimed Property), has notified numerous companies, including Apache Corporation, that the State will examine its books and records and those of its subsidiaries and related entities to determine compliance with the Delaware Escheat Laws. The review is being conducted by Kelmar Associates on behalf of the State of Delaware. At least 30 other states have retained their own consultants and have sent similar notifications. The scope of each states audit varies. The State of Delaware advises, for example, that the scope of its examination will be for the period 1981 through the present. It is possible that one or more of the audits could extend to all 50 states. The exposure related to the audits is not currently determinable.
Burrup-Related Gas Supply Lawsuits
On May 19, 2011, a lawsuit captioned Pankaj Oswal et al. v. Apache Corporation , Cause No. 2011-30302, in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, was filed in which plaintiffs asserted claims against the Company under the Australian Trade Practices Act. On April 5, 2013, the court granted Apache Corporations motion to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens and entered an order dismissing the Texas lawsuit. On or about
F-34
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
October 11, 2013, a statement of claim captioned Pankaj Oswal v. Apache Corporation , No. WAD 389/2013, in the Federal Court of Australia, District of Western Australia, General Division, was filed in which plaintiff re-asserted claims against the Company under the Australian Trade Practices Act. Plaintiff alleged, among other things, that the Company induced him to make investments covering construction cost overruns on the Burrup Fertilisers ammonia plant in Western Australia (the Burrup plant), which was completed in 2006. Plaintiff sought damages in the amount of $491 million USD. On the eve of a trial that was to commence February 9, 2015, plaintiff decided to discontinue his lawsuit. Once the Court enters a final form of order, the lawsuit will be concluded in the Companys favor.
The Western Australia lawsuit is one of a number of legal actions involving the Burrup plant. Oswals shares, and those of his wife Radhika Oswal, together representing 65 percent of Burrup Holdings Limited (BHL, as it was then known, which owns Burrup Fertilisers), were offered for sale by externally-appointed administrators in Australia as a result of events of default on loans made to the Oswals and associated entities by the Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (ANZ). As part of the sale process, on January 31, 2012, a Company affiliate acquired a 49 percent interest in BHL (now known as Yara Pilbara Holdings Pty Ltd, YPHPL), while Yara Australia Pty Ltd (Yara) increased its interest in YPHPL from 35 percent to 51 percent. Yara operates the ammonia plant and is proceeding with development of a technical ammonium nitrate (TAN) plant in the Burrup Peninsula region of Western Australia to be developed by a consortium including YPHPL. The old gas sale agreement to supply natural gas to the ammonia plant, and to which a Company subsidiary was a party, has been modified with, among other things, new pricing, delivery quantities, and term.
YPHPL share ownership and the modified gas sale agreement continue to be the subject of ongoing litigation in Australia with third parties, including Pankaj and Radhika Oswal. In Radhika Oswal v. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited & Ors , No. SCI 2011 4653, and Pankaj Oswal v. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited & Ors, No. SCI 2012 01995, in the Supreme Court of Victoria, named defendants include the Company and certain of its subsidiaries. In these Victoria proceedings, the Oswal plaintiffs seek to set aside the YPHPL share sale, void the modified gas sale agreement, and recover unspecified damages. The cases are presently set for trial commencing August 2015.
The new gas sale agreement resolved counterclaims by Burrup Fertilisers against Apache and certain of its subsidiaries in Tap (Harriet) Pty Ltd (Tap) v. Burrup Fertilisers Pty Ltd & Ors , Civ. 2329 of 2009, in the Supreme Court of Western Australia (the Tap Action), which concerned the parties contractual rights and obligations under the old gas sale agreement between Burrup Fertilisers and the Harriet Joint Venture (the HJV, comprised of a Company subsidiary and two joint venture partners, Tap and Kufpec Australia Pty Ltd). A Company subsidiary purchased Tap, which then modified its agreement to supply gas to the ammonia plant and resolved both Taps claims against Burrup Fertilisers and Burrup Fertilisers counterclaims against Tap in the Tap Action. In 2014 Kufpec settled the remaining claims in the Tap Action, which has now been dismissed and is concluded.
Environmental Matters
The Company, as an owner or lessee and operator of oil and gas properties, is subject to various federal, provincial, state, local, and foreign country laws and regulations relating to discharge of materials into, and protection of, the environment. These laws and regulations may, among other things, impose liability on the lessee under an oil and gas lease for the cost of pollution clean-up resulting from operations and subject the lessee to liability for pollution damages. In some instances, the Company may be directed to suspend or cease operations in the affected area. We maintain insurance coverage, which we believe is customary in the industry, although we are not fully insured against all environmental risks.
F-35
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Apache manages its exposure to environmental liabilities on properties to be acquired by identifying existing problems and assessing the potential liability. The Company also conducts periodic reviews, on a Company-wide basis, to identify changes in its environmental risk profile. These reviews evaluate whether there is a probable liability, the amount, and the likelihood that the liability will be incurred. The amount of any potential liability is determined by considering, among other matters, incremental direct costs of any likely remediation and the proportionate cost of employees who are expected to devote a significant amount of time directly to any possible remediation effort. As it relates to evaluations of purchased properties, depending on the extent of an identified environmental problem, the Company may exclude a property from the acquisition, require the seller to remediate the property to Apaches satisfaction, or agree to assume liability for the remediation of the property. The Companys general policy is to limit any reserve additions to any incidents or sites that are considered probable to result in an expected remediation cost exceeding $300,000. Any environmental costs and liabilities that are not reserved for are treated as an expense when actually incurred. In Apaches estimation, neither these expenses nor expenses related to training and compliance programs are likely to have a material impact on its financial condition.
As of December 31, 2014, the Company had an undiscounted reserve for environmental remediation of approximately $67 million. Apache is not aware of any environmental claims existing as of December 31, 2014 that have not been provided for or would otherwise have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations. There can be no assurance however, that current regulatory requirements will not change or past non-compliance with environmental laws will not be discovered on the Companys properties.
On June 1, 2013, Apache Canada Ltd. discovered a leak of produced water from a below ground pipeline in the Zama Operations area in northern Alberta. The pipeline was associated with a produced water disposal well. The spill resulted in approximately 97 thousand barrels of produced water being released to the marsh land environment. The applicable government agencies were immediately notified of the event and the line was shut down. Apache Canada Ltd. investigated the leak while conducting clean up and monitoring activities in the affected area and communicating with appropriate parties, including regulatory and First Nation representatives. The investigation revealed a pinhole feature in the outer polyethylene liner of the composite flex line. While the exposure related to this incident is not currently determinable, the Company does not expect the economic impact of this incident to have a material effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. It is possible that the June 2013 leak together with additional discharges in the Zama Operations area, including several that have occurred since June 2013, could result in government fines or sanction.
Contractual Obligations
At December 31, 2014, contractual obligations for drilling rigs, purchase obligations, firm transportation agreements, and long-term operating leases are as follows:
Net Minimum Commitments |
Total | 2015 | 2016-2017 | 2018-2019 |
2020 &
Beyond |
|||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Drilling rig commitments(1) |
$ | 999 | $ | 382 | $ | 573 | $ | 44 | $ | | ||||||||||
Purchase obligations(2) |
1,248 | 527 | 428 | 255 | 38 | |||||||||||||||
Firm transportation agreements(3) |
431 | 101 | 173 | 85 | 72 | |||||||||||||||
Office and related equipment(4) |
343 | 49 | 98 | 80 | 116 | |||||||||||||||
Other operating lease obligations(5) |
469 | 131 | 221 | 82 | 35 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Net Minimum Commitments |
$ | 3,490 | $ | 1,190 | $ | 1,493 | $ | 546 | $ | 261 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(1) |
Includes day-rate and other contractual agreements with third party service providers for use of drilling, completion, and workover rigs. Drilling rig commitments will be reduced by $79 million upon the completion of the sale of Apaches interest in the Kitimat and Wheatstone LNG projects. |
(2) |
Includes contractual obligations to buy or build oil and gas plants and facilities, LNG facilities, seismic and drilling work program commitments, take-or-pay contracts, and NGL processing agreements. Of the total purchase obligations, $651 million will be relinquished upon completion of the sale of Apaches interest in Kitimat and Wheatstone LNG projects. |
(3) |
Relates to contractual obligations for capacity rights on third-party pipelines. Firm transportation commitments will be reduced by $51 million upon completion of the sale of Apaches interest in the Kitimat and Wheatstone LNG projects. |
(4) |
Includes office and other building rentals and related equipment leases. |
(5) |
Includes commitments required to retain acreage and commitments associated with floating production storage and offloading vessels (FPSOs), compressors, helicopters, and boats. Other operating lease commitments will be reduced by $291 million upon completion of the sale of Apaches interest in the Kitimat and Wheatstone LNG projects. |
The table above includes leases for buildings, facilities, and related equipment with varying expiration dates through 2035. Net rental expense, excluding discontinued operations in Argentina, was $58 million, $53 million, and $49 million for 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. Costs incurred under take-or-pay and throughput obligations were $96 million, $80 million, and $71 million for 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
9. RETIREMENT AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS
Apache Corporation provides retirement benefits to its U.S. employees through the use of multiple plans: a 401(k) savings plan, a money purchase retirement plan, a non-qualified retirement/savings plan, and a non-qualified restorative retirement savings plan. The 401(k) savings plan provides participating employees the ability to elect to contribute up to 50 percent of eligible compensation, as defined, to the plan with the Company making matching contributions up to a maximum of 8 percent of each employees annual eligible compensation. In addition, the Company annually contributes 6 percent of each participating employees annual eligible compensation to a money purchase retirement plan. The 401(k) savings plan and the money purchase retirement plan are subject to certain annually-adjusted, government-mandated restrictions that limit the amount of employee and Company contributions. For certain eligible employees, the Company also provides a non-qualified retirement/savings plan or a non-qualified restorative retirement savings plan. These plans allow the deferral of up to 50 percent of each employees base salary, up to 75 percent of each employees annual bonus (that accepts employee contributions) and the Companys matching contributions in excess of the government mandated limitations imposed in the 401(k) savings plan and money purchase retirement plan.
Vesting in the Companys contributions in the 401(k) savings plan, the money purchase retirement plan, the non-qualified retirement savings plan and the non-qualified restorative retirement savings plan occurs at the rate of 20 percent for every completed year of employment. Upon a change in control of ownership, immediate and full vesting occurs.
Additionally, Apache Energy Limited, Apache Canada Ltd., and Apache North Sea Limited maintain separate retirement plans, as required under the laws of Australia, Canada, and the U.K., respectively.
F-37
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The aggregate annual cost to Apache of all U.S. and International savings plans, the money purchase retirement plan, non-qualified retirement/savings plan, and non-qualified restorative retirement savings plan was $107 million, $123 million, and $117 million for 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
Apache also provides a funded noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (U.K. Pension Plan) covering certain employees of the Companys North Sea operations in the U.K. The plan provides defined pension benefits based on years of service and final salary. The plan applies only to employees who were part of the BP North Seas pension plan as of April 2, 2003, prior to the acquisition of BP North Sea by the Company effective July 1, 2003.
Additionally, the Company offers postretirement medical benefits to U.S. employees who meet certain eligibility requirements. Eligible participants receive medical benefits up until the age of 65, provided the participant remits the required portion of the cost of coverage. The plan is contributory with participants contributions adjusted annually. The postretirement benefit plan does not cover benefit expenses once a covered participant becomes eligible for Medicare.
F-38
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following tables set forth the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets and funded status as of December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, and the underlying weighted average actuarial assumptions used for the U.K. Pension Plan and U.S. postretirement benefit plan. Apache uses a measurement date of December 31 for its pension and postretirement benefit plans.
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension | Postretirement | Pension | Postretirement | Pension | Postretirement | |||||||||||||||||||
Benefits | Benefits | Benefits | Benefits | Benefits | Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Projected benefit obligation beginning of year |
$ | 189 | $ | 28 | $ | 177 | $ | 35 | $ | 150 | $ | 30 | ||||||||||||
Service cost |
5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
9 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange rate changes |
(13 | ) | | 4 | | 7 | | |||||||||||||||||
Actuarial losses (gains) |
31 | (9 | ) | | (8 | ) | 14 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Effect of curtailment and settlements |
| | | (3 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Benefits paid |
(5 | ) | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | (6 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Retiree contributions |
| 1 | | 1 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Projected benefit obligation at end of year |
216 | 22 | 189 | 28 | 177 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Change in Plan Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
191 | | 170 | | 145 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Actual return on plan assets |
25 | | 15 | | 14 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange rates |
(13 | ) | | 4 | | 6 | | |||||||||||||||||
Employer contributions |
8 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Benefits paid |
(5 | ) | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | (6 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Retiree contributions |
| 1 | | 1 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
206 | | 191 | | 170 | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Funded status at end of year |
$ | (10 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | (28 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (35 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheet |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liability |
| (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Non-current asset (liability) |
(10 | ) | (21 | ) | 2 | (27 | ) | (7 | ) | (34 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
$ | (10 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | (28 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (35 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Pre-tax Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated gain (loss) |
(37 | ) | 10 | (22 | ) | 1 | (32 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
$ | (37 | ) | $ | 10 | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | (32 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted Average Assumptions used as of December 31 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate |
3.70 | % | 3.62 | % | 4.60 | % | 4.33 | % | 4.30 | % | 3.43 | % | ||||||||||||
Salary increases |
4.60 | % | N/A | 4.90 | % | N/A | 4.60 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Expected return on assets |
3.90 | % | N/A | 5.60 | % | N/A | 4.70 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Healthcare cost trend |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial |
N/A | 7.00 | % | N/A | 7.00 | % | N/A | 7.25 | % | |||||||||||||||
Ultimate in 2025 |
N/A | 5.00 | % | N/A | 5.00 | % | N/A | 5.00 | % |
F-39
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, the accumulated benefit obligation for the U.K. Pension Plan was $183 million, $160 million, and $139 million, respectively.
Apaches defined benefit pension plan assets are held by a non-related trustee who has been instructed to invest the assets in a blend of equity securities and low-risk debt securities. The Company intends that this blend of investments will provide a reasonable rate of return such that the benefits promised to members are provided. The U.K. Pension Plan policy is to target an ongoing funding level of 100 percent through prudent investments and includes policies and strategies such as investment goals, risk management practices, and permitted and prohibited investments. A breakout of previous allocations for plan asset holdings and the target allocation for the Companys plan assets are summarized below:
Target Allocation |
Percentage of
Plan Assets at Year-End |
|||||||||||
2014 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Asset Category |
||||||||||||
Equity securities: |
||||||||||||
U.K. quoted equities |
14 | % | 14 | % | 18 | % | ||||||
Overseas quoted equities |
26 | % | 26 | % | 33 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total equity securities |
40 | % | 40 | % | 51 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||
U.K. Government bonds |
48 | % | 48 | % | 29 | % | ||||||
U.K. corporate bonds |
12 | % | 12 | % | 20 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Debt securities |
60 | % | 60 | % | 49 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The plans assets do not include any direct ownership of equity or debt securities of Apache. The fair value of plan assets is based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets, which is a Level 1 fair value measurement. The following tables present the fair values of plan assets for each major asset category based on the nature and significant concentration of risks in plan assets at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
F-40
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair Value Measurements Using: | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Price
in Active Markets (Level 1) |
Significant
Other Inputs (Level 2) |
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3) |
Total Fair
Value |
|||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||
Equity securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.K. quoted equities(1) |
$ | 35 | $ | | $ | | $ | 35 | ||||||||
Overseas quoted equities(2) |
63 | | | 63 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total equity securities |
98 | | | 98 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.K. Government bonds(3) |
54 | | | 54 | ||||||||||||
U.K. corporate bonds(4) |
38 | | | 38 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total debt securities |
92 | | | 92 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cash |
1 | | | 1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Fair value of plan assets |
$ | 191 | $ | | $ | | $ | 191 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
This category comprises U.K. passive equities, which are benchmarked against the FTSE 350 Index. |
(2) |
This category includes overseas equities, which comprises 30.3 percent passive global equities benchmarked against the MSCI World (NDR) Index, 12.1 percent passive global equities (hedged) benchmarked against the MSCI World (NDR) Hedged Index, 30.3 percent fundamental indexation global equities benchmarked against the FTSE RAFI Developed 1000 index, 12.1 percent fundamental indexation global equities (hedged) benchmarked against the FTSE RAFI Developed 1000 Hedge Index, and 15.2 percent emerging markets benchmarked against the MSCI Emerging Markets (NDR) Index, which has a performance target of 2 percent per annum over the benchmark over a rolling three-year period. |
(3) |
This category includes U.K. Government bonds, which comprises 48 percent index-linked gilts benchmarked against the FTSE Actuaries Government Securities Index-Linked Over 5 Years Index, 37 percent sterling nominal LDI bonds, and 15 percent sterling inflation linked LDI bonds, both benchmarked against ILIM Custom Benchmark index. |
(4) |
This category comprises U.K. corporate bonds: 12 percent benchmarked against the BofAML Sterling Corporate & Collaterlised (excluding Subordinated) Index with a performance target of 0.75 percent per annum over the benchmark over a rolling five year period. |
The expected long-term rate of return on assets assumptions are derived relative to the yield on long-dated fixed-interest bonds issued by the U.K. government (gilts). For equities, outperformance relative to gilts is assumed to be 3.5 percent per year.
F-41
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following tables set forth the components of the net periodic cost and the underlying weighted average actuarial assumptions used for the pension and postretirement benefit plans as of December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012:
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension | Postretirement | Pension | Postretirement | Pension | Postretirement | |||||||||||||||||||
Benefits | Benefits | Benefits | Benefits | Benefits | Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Component of Net Periodic Benefit Costs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 5 | $ | 3 | $ | 5 | $ | 4 | $ | 5 | $ | 4 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost |
9 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on assets |
(11 | ) | | (8 | ) | | (7 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss |
1 | | 2 | | 1 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Curtailment (gain) loss |
| | | (3 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 4 | $ | 4 | $ | 6 | $ | 2 | $ | 6 | $ | 5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted Average Assumptions used to determine Net Period Benefit Cost for the Years ended December 31 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate |
4.60 | % | 4.33 | % | 4.30 | % | 3.43 | % | 4.70 | % | 4.04 | % | ||||||||||||
Salary increases |
4.90 | % | N/A | 4.60 | % | N/A | 4.60 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Expected return on assets |
5.60 | % | N/A | 4.70 | % | N/A | 4.85 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Healthcare cost trend |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial |
N/A | 7.00 | % | N/A | 7.25 | % | N/A | 7.50 | % | |||||||||||||||
Ultimate in 2025 |
N/A | 5.00 | % | N/A | 5.00 | % | N/A | 5.00 | % |
Assumed health care cost trend rates affect amounts reported for postretirement benefits. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
Postretirement Benefits | ||||||||
1% Increase | 1% Decrease | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Effect on service and interest cost components |
$ | 1 | $ | (1 | ) | |||
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation |
3 | (3 | ) |
Apache expects to contribute approximately $8 million to its pension plan and $1 million to its postretirement benefit plan in 2015. The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
Pension | Postretirement | |||||||
Benefits | Benefits | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
2015 |
$ | 5 | $ | 1 | ||||
2016 |
5 | 1 | ||||||
2017 |
5 | 1 | ||||||
2018 |
5 | 2 | ||||||
2019 |
5 | 2 | ||||||
Years 2020-2024 |
30 | 10 |
F-42
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
10. CAPITAL STOCK
Common Stock Outstanding
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
395,772,908 | 391,640,770 | 384,117,643 | |||||||||
Shares issued for stock-based compensation plans: |
||||||||||||
Treasury shares issued |
17,454 | 25,214 | 60,767 | |||||||||
Common shares issued |
1,665,259 | 929,596 | 1,189,693 | |||||||||
Common shares issued for conversion of preferred shares |
| 14,399,247 | | |||||||||
Treasury shares acquired |
(20,950,729 | ) | (11,221,919 | ) | | |||||||
Cordillera consideration (Note 2) |
| | 6,272,667 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance, end of year |
376,504,892 | 395,772,908 | 391,640,770 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income per Common Share
A reconciliation of the components of basic and diluted net income per common share for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 is presented in the table below.
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income | Shares | Per Share | Income | Shares | Per Share | Income | Shares | Per Share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | (4,886 | ) | 384 | $ | (12.72 | ) | $ | 2,380 | 395 | $ | 6.02 | $ | 1,911 | 389 | $ | 4.91 | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
(517 | ) | 384 | (1.34 | ) | (192 | ) | 395 | (0.49 | ) | 14 | 389 | 0.04 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) attributable to common stock |
$ | (5,403 | ) | 384 | $ | (14.06 | ) | $ | 2,188 | 395 | $ | 5.53 | $ | 1,925 | 389 | $ | 4.95 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of Dilutive Securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock |
$ | | | $ | 44 | 9 | $ | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options and other |
| | | 2 | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | (4,886 | ) | 384 | $ | (12.72 | ) | $ | 2,424 | 406 | $ | 5.97 | $ | 1,911 | 391 | $ | 4.89 | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
(517 | ) | 384 | (1.34 | ) | (192 | ) | 406 | (0.47 | ) | 14 | 391 | 0.03 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) attributable to common stock |
$ | (5,403 | ) | 384 | $ | (14.06 | ) | $ | 2,232 | 406 | $ | 5.50 | $ | 1,925 | 391 | $ | 4.92 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The diluted EPS calculation excludes options and restricted shares that were anti-dilutive totaling 4.5 million, 4.9 million, and 4.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2012, 14.3 million shares related to the assumed conversion of the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock were also anti-dilutive.
F-43
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock Repurchase Program
Apaches Board of Directors has authorized the purchase of up to 40 million shares of the Companys common stock. Shares may be purchased either in the open market or through privately held negotiated transactions. The Company initiated the buyback program on June 10, 2013, and through December 31, 2014, has repurchased a total of 32.2 million shares at an average price of $88.96 per share. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company repurchased a total of 21.0 million shares at an average price of $89.00 per share. The Company is not obligated to acquire any specific number of shares.
Common Stock Dividend
The Company paid common stock dividends of $0.95 per share in 2014, $0.77 per share in 2013, and $0.66 per share in 2012.
Stock Compensation Plans
The Company has several stock-based compensation plans, which include stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and conditional restricted stock unit plans. On May 5, 2011, the Companys shareholders approved the 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the 2011 Plan), which is intended to provide eligible employees with equity-based incentives. The 2011 Plan provides for the granting of Incentive Stock Options, Non-Qualified Stock Options, Performance Awards, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Stock Appreciation Rights, or any combination of the foregoing. A total of 18.3 million shares were authorized and available for grant under the 2011 Plan as of December 31, 2014. Previously approved plans remain in effect solely for the purpose of governing grants still outstanding that were issued prior to approval of the 2011 Plan. All new grants are issued from the 2011 Plan.
For 2014, 2013, and 2012, stock-based compensation expensed was $148 million, $136 million, and $167 million ($95 million, $94 million, and $119 million after tax), respectively. Costs related to the plans are capitalized or expensed based on the nature of each employees activities. A description of the Companys stock-based compensation plans and related costs follows:
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expensed: |
||||||||||||
General and administrative |
$ | 107 | $ | 89 | $ | 104 | ||||||
Lease operating expenses |
41 | 47 | 63 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation capitalized |
62 | 55 | 67 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
$ | 210 | $ | 191 | $ | 234 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
As of December 31, 2014, the Company had issued options to purchase shares of the Companys common stock under one or more of the employee stock option plans adopted in 2000 and 2005 (collectively, the Stock Option Plans), as well as the 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the 2007 Plan), and the 2011 Plan discussed above (together, the Omnibus Plans). New shares of Company stock will be issued for employee stock option exercises; however, under the 2000 Stock Option Plan, shares of treasury stock are used for employee stock option exercises to the extent treasury stock is held. Under the Stock Option Plans and the Omnibus Plans, the exercise price of each option equals the closing price of Apaches common stock on the date of grant.
F-44
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Options generally become exercisable ratably over a four-year period and expire 10 years after granted. The Omnibus Plans and all of the Stock Option Plans, except for the 2000 Stock Option Plan, were submitted to and approved by the Companys shareholders.
A summary of stock options issued and outstanding under the Stock Option Plans and the Omnibus Plans is presented in the table and narrative below:
2014 | ||||||||
Shares
Under Option |
Weighted Average
Exercise Price |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of year |
7,563 | $ | 89.71 | |||||
Granted |
| | ||||||
Exercised |
(664 | ) | 74.32 | |||||
Forfeited or expired |
(454 | ) | 103.48 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Outstanding, end of year(1) |
6,445 | 90.34 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Expected to vest(1) |
1,366 | 89.30 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Exercisable, end of year(1) |
4,876 | 90.88 | ||||||
|
|
(1) |
As of December 31, 2014, the weighted average remaining contractual life for options outstanding, expected to vest, and exercisable is 5.2 years, 7.5 years, and 4.4 years, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding, expected to vest, and exercisable at year-end was $2 million, $0, and $2 million, respectively. |
The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Assumptions used in the valuation are disclosed in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Companys common stock and other factors. The expected dividend yield is based on historical yields on the date of grant. The expected term of stock options granted represents the period of time that the stock options are expected to be outstanding and is derived from historical exercise behavior, current trends, and values derived from lattice-based models. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
Expected volatility |
N/A | 33.60 | % | 34.94 | % | |||||||
Expected dividend yields |
N/A | 0.99 | % | 0.82 | % | |||||||
Expected term (in years) |
N/A | 5.5 | 5.5 | |||||||||
Risk-free rate |
N/A | 0.79 | % | 0.78 | % | |||||||
Weighted-average grant-date fair value |
N/A | $ | 23.18 | $ | 26.41 |
The intrinsic value of options exercised during 2014, 2013, and 2012 was approximately $13 million, $4 million and $12 million, respectively. The cash received from exercise of options during 2014 was approximately $49 million. The Company realized an additional tax benefit of approximately $4.7 million for the amount of intrinsic value in excess of compensation cost recognized in 2014. As of December 31, 2014, the total compensation cost related to non-vested options not yet recognized was $24 million, which will be recognized over the remaining vesting period of the options.
F-45
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
The Company has restricted stock and restricted stock unit plans for eligible employees including officers. The programs created under the Omnibus Plans have been approved by Apaches Board of Directors. In 2014, the Company awarded 3,046,744 restricted stock units at a weighted-average per-share market price of $86.87. In 2013 and 2012, the Company awarded 3,098,029 and 1,219,886 restricted stock units at a weighted-average per-share market price of $82.95 and $85.67, respectively. The value of the stock issued was established by the market price on the date of grant and is being recorded as compensation expense ratably over the vesting terms. During 2014, 2013, and 2012, $93 million ($60 million after tax), $82 million ($53 million after tax), and $74 million ($48 million after tax), respectively, was charged to expense. In 2014, 2013, and 2012, $43 million, $30 million, and $25 million was capitalized, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, there was $316 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to 4,783,524 unvested restricted stock units. The weighted-average remaining life of unvested restricted stock units is approximately 1.2 years.
The fair value of the awards vested during 2014, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $138 million, $88 million, and $114 million, respectively. A summary of restricted stock activity for the year ended December 31, 2014, is presented below.
Shares |
Weighted-
Average Grant- Date Fair Value |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Non-vested at January 1, 2014 |
3,953 | $ | 86.70 | |||||
Granted |
3,047 | 86.87 | ||||||
Vested |
(1,597 | ) | 86.42 | |||||
Forfeited |
(619 | ) | 85.89 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Non-vested at December 31, 2014 |
4,784 | 85.18 | ||||||
|
|
Total Shareholder Return and Conditional Restricted Stock Units
To provide long-term incentives for Apache employees to deliver competitive returns to the Companys stockholders, the Company has granted conditional restricted stock units to eligible employees. The ultimate number of shares awarded from these conditional restricted stock units is based upon measurement of total shareholder return of Apache common stock as compared to a designated peer group during a three-year performance period. Should any restricted stock units be awarded at the end of the three-year performance period, 50 percent of restricted stock units awarded will immediately vest, and an additional 25 percent will vest on succeeding anniversaries of the end of the performance period. Grants from two total shareholder return programs were outstanding at December 31, 2014, as described below:
|
In January 2012 the Companys Board of Directors approved the 2012 Performance Program, pursuant to the 2011 Plan. In January 2012 eligible employees received initial conditional restricted stock unit awards totaling 851,985 units. Based on measurements of total shareholder return relative to the designated peer group at December 31, 2014, zero shares were awarded and all unvested conditional restricted stock units were cancelled. Upon cancellation, all remaining unamortized expense related to these awards was immediately amortized. |
|
In January 2013 the Companys Board of Directors approved the 2013 Performance Program, pursuant to the 2011 Plan. In January 2013 eligible employees received initial conditional restricted stock unit awards totaling 1,232,176 units. In May 2013, the Companys Board of Directors cancelled 918,016 awards under the 2013 Performance Program for nonexecutive employees. A total of 236,704 awards were outstanding at December 31, 2014, from which a minimum of zero and a maximum of 591,760 units could be awarded. |
F-46
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
In January 2014 the Companys Board of Directors approved the 2014 Performance Program, pursuant to the 2011 Plan. In January 2014 eligible employees received initial conditional restricted stock unit awards totaling 157,406 units. A total of 117,007 awards were outstanding at December 31, 2014, from which a minimum of zero and a maximum of 234,014 units could be awarded. |
The fair value cost of the awards was estimated on the date of grant and is being recorded as compensation expense ratably over the vesting terms. During 2014, 2013, and 2012, $18 million ($11 million after tax), $27 million ($17 million after tax), and $47 million ($31 million after tax), respectively, was charged to expense. During 2014, 2013, and 2012, $7 million, $13 million, and $21 million was capitalized, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, there was $15 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to 353,711 unvested conditional restricted stock units. The weighted-average remaining life of the unvested conditional restricted stock units is approximately 2.1 years.
Shares |
Weighted-
Average Grant- Date Fair Value(1) |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Non-vested at January 1, 2014 |
1,021 | $ | 72.45 | |||||
Granted |
158 | 79.66 | ||||||
Vested |
(1 | ) | 70.30 | |||||
Forfeited or expired |
(824 | ) | 71.39 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Non-vested at December 31, 2014 |
354 | 78.13 | ||||||
|
|
(1) |
The fair value of each conditional restricted stock unit award is estimated as of the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation with the following assumptions used for all grants made under the plan: (i) a three-year continuous risk-free interest rate; (ii) a constant volatility assumption based on the historical realized stock price volatility of the Company and the designated peer group; and (iii) the historical stock prices and expected dividends of the common stock of the Company and its designated peer group. |
11. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss include the following:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustment(1) |
$ | (109 | ) | $ | (109 | ) | $ | (109 | ) | |||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives (Note 3) |
| 1 | (6 | ) | ||||||||
Unfunded pension and postretirement benefit plan (Note 9) |
(7 | ) | (7 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
$ | (116 | ) | $ | (115 | ) | $ | (131 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Currency translation adjustments resulting from translating the Canadian subsidiaries financial statements into U.S. dollar equivalents, prior to adoption of the U.S. dollar as their functional currency, were reported separately and accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss). |
12. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
In 2014, 2013, and 2012, purchases by Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries accounted for 19 percent, 24 percent, and 20 percent, respectively, of the Companys worldwide oil and gas production revenues.
F-47
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
13. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
Apache is engaged in a single line of business. Both domestically and internationally, the Company explores for, develops, and produces natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids. At December 31, 2014, the Company had production in five countries: the United States, Canada, Egypt, Australia, and the U.K. North Sea. Apache also pursues exploration interests in other countries that may over time result in reportable discoveries and development opportunities. Financial information for each country is presented below:
United States | Canada | Egypt(1) | Australia |
North
Sea |
Other
International |
Total(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas production revenues |
$ | 5,744 | $ | 1,092 | $ | 3,539 | $ | 1,058 | $ | 2,316 | $ | | $ | 13,749 | ||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recurring |
2,170 | 400 | 1,151 | 438 | 998 | | 5,157 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Additional |
4,412 | | | | 589 | | 5,001 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
43 | 39 | | 27 | 72 | | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses |
921 | 384 | 499 | 241 | 434 | | 2,479 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gathering and transportation |
93 | 123 | 40 | | 17 | | 273 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Taxes other than income |
350 | 31 | 11 | 101 | 185 | | 678 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
$ | (2,245 | ) | $ | 115 | $ | 1,838 | $ | 251 | $ | 21 | $ | | (20 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Other Income (Expense): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative instrument gains, net |
284 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
(182 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairments |
(2,357 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
(434 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, divestiture, and separation costs |
(67 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing costs, net |
(130 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Loss From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
$ | (2,906 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Property and Equipment |
$ | 24,627 | $ | 6,107 | $ | 5,700 | $ | 6,516 | $ | 5,103 | $ | 23 | $ | 48,076 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 26,852 | $ | 6,640 | $ | 7,292 | $ | 9,020 | $ | 6,102 | $ | 46 | $ | 55,952 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Additions to Net Property and Equipment |
$ | 7,294 | $ | 963 | $ | 1,397 | $ | 1,419 | $ | 1,071 | $ | (28 | ) | $ | 12,116 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas production revenues(2) |
$ | 6,902 | $ | 1,224 | $ | 3,917 | $ | 1,140 | $ | 2,728 | $ | | $ | 15,911 | ||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recurring |
2,338 | 505 | 1,005 | 423 | 1,022 | 1 | 5,294 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Additional |
552 | | | | 367 | 76 | 995 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
94 | 49 | | 27 | 68 | | 238 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses |
1,320 | 459 | 471 | 214 | 400 | | 2,864 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gathering and transportation |
84 | 155 | 42 | | 7 | | 288 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Taxes other than income |
335 | 45 | 8 | 13 | 384 | | 785 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating Income (Loss)(2) |
$ | 2,179 | $ | 11 | $ | 2,391 | $ | 463 | $ | 480 | $ | (77 | ) | 5,447 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Other Income (Expense): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative instrument losses, net |
(399 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
(482 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, divestiture, and separation costs |
(33 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing costs, net |
(177 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes(2) |
$ | 4,404 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Property and Equipment(2) |
$ | 27,010 | $ | 6,058 | $ | 5,454 | $ | 6,838 | $ | 5,622 | $ | 23 | $ | 51,005 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Assets(2) |
$ | 29,940 | $ | 6,952 | $ | 8,121 | $ | 8,094 | $ | 6,902 | $ | 51 | $ | 60,060 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Additions to Net Property and Equipment(2) |
$ | 6,404 | $ | 1,082 | $ | 1,309 | $ | 1,954 | $ | 1,084 | $ | 24 | $ | 11,857 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
United States | Canada | Egypt | Australia |
North
Sea |
Other
International |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas production revenues(2) |
$ | 6,226 | $ | 1,322 | $ | 4,554 | $ | 1,575 | $ | 2,751 | $ | | $ | 16,428 | ||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recurring |
2,056 | 594 | 925 | 466 | 914 | | 4,955 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Additional |
| 1,883 | | | | 43 | 1,926 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
112 | 41 | | 17 | 58 | | 228 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses |
1,386 | 458 | 410 | 215 | 315 | | 2,784 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gathering and transportation |
69 | 163 | 39 | | 24 | | 295 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Taxes other than income |
292 | 50 | 14 | 11 | 451 | | 818 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating Income (Loss)(2) |
$ | 2,311 | $ | (1,867 | ) | $ | 3,166 | $ | 866 | $ | 989 | $ | (43 | ) | 5,422 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Other Expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative instrument losses, net |
(79 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
215 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
(515 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, divestiture, and separation costs |
(31 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing costs, net |
(172 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes(2) |
$ | 4,840 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Property and Equipment(2) |
$ | 28,552 | $ | 6,640 | $ | 5,151 | $ | 5,312 | $ | 5,927 | $ | 77 | $ | 51,659 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Assets(2) |
$ | 31,175 | $ | 7,142 | $ | 7,311 | $ | 6,280 | $ | 6,874 | $ | 120 | $ | 58,902 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Additions to Net Property and Equipment(2) |
$ | 9,586 | $ | 1,096 | $ | 1,153 | $ | 1,581 | $ | 1,104 | $ | 98 | $ | 14,618 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
2014 and 2013 includes a noncontrolling interest in Egypt. |
(2) |
2013 and 2012 amounts have been recast to exclude discontinued operations. |
F-49
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
14. SUPPLEMENTAL OIL AND GAS DISCLOSURES (Unaudited)
Oil and Gas Operations
The following table sets forth revenue and direct cost information relating to the Companys oil and gas exploration and production activities. Apache has no long-term agreements to purchase oil or gas production from foreign governments or authorities.
United States | Canada | Egypt(3) | Australia | North Sea |
Other
International |
Total(3)(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions, except per boe) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas production revenues |
$ | 5,744 | $ | 1,092 | $ | 3,539 | $ | 1,058 | $ | 2,316 | $ | | $ | 13,749 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating cost: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recurring(1) |
2,056 | 343 | 1,014 | 359 | 975 | | 4,747 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Additional |
4,412 | | | | 589 | | 5,001 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
43 | 39 | | 27 | 72 | | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses |
921 | 384 | 499 | 241 | 434 | | 2,479 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gathering and transportation |
93 | 123 | 40 | | 17 | | 273 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production taxes(2) |
342 | 27 | | 101 | 177 | | 647 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax |
(754 | ) | 44 | 894 | 99 | 32 | | 315 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
7,113 | 960 | 2,447 | 827 | 2,296 | | 13,643 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Results of operation |
$ | (1,369 | ) | $ | 132 | $ | 1,092 | $ | 231 | $ | 20 | $ | | $ | 106 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Amortization rate per boe |
$ | 19.35 | $ | 12.11 | $ | 18.48 | $ | 17.49 | $ | 37.41 | $ | | $ | 20.11 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas production revenues |
$ | 6,902 | $ | 1,224 | $ | 3,917 | $ | 1,140 | $ | 2,728 | $ | | $ | 15,911 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating cost: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recurring(1) |
2,227 | 426 | 881 | 361 | 999 | | 4,894 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Additional |
552 | | | | 367 | 76 | 995 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
94 | 49 | | 27 | 68 | | 238 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses |
1,320 | 459 | 471 | 214 | 400 | | 2,864 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gathering and transportation |
84 | 155 | 42 | | 7 | | 288 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production taxes(2) |
324 | 40 | | 14 | 382 | | 760 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax |
817 | 24 | 1,161 | 157 | 313 | | 2,472 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
5,418 | 1,153 | 2,555 | 773 | 2,536 | 76 | 12,511 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Results of operation |
$ | 1,484 | $ | 71 | $ | 1,362 | $ | 367 | $ | 192 | $ | (76 | ) | $ | 3,400 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Amortization rate per boe |
$ | 18.39 | $ | 10.89 | $ | 16.21 | $ | 17.47 | $ | 37.25 | $ | | $ | 18.67 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas production revenues |
$ | 6,226 | $ | 1,322 | $ | 4,554 | $ | 1,575 | $ | 2,751 | $ | | $ | 16,428 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating cost: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recurring(1) |
1,984 | 580 | 924 | 460 | 912 | | 4,860 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Additional |
| 1,883 | | | | 43 | 1,926 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
112 | 41 | | 17 | 58 | | 228 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses |
1,386 | 458 | 410 | 215 | 315 | | 2,784 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gathering and transportation |
69 | 163 | 39 | | 24 | | 295 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production taxes(2) |
279 | 42 | | 11 | 451 | | 783 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax |
851 | (466 | ) | 1,527 | 262 | 614 | | 2,788 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
4,681 | 2,701 | 2,900 | 965 | 2,374 | 43 | 13,664 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Results of operation |
$ | 1,545 | $ | (1,379 | ) | $ | 1,654 | $ | 610 | $ | 377 | $ | (43 | ) | $ | 2,764 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Amortization rate per boe |
$ | 17.24 | $ | 11.66 | $ | 13.81 | $ | 17.67 | $ | 32.65 | $ | | $ | 17.18 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
This amount only reflects DD&A of capitalized costs of oil and gas proved properties and, therefore, does not agree with DD&A reflected on Note 13Business Segment Information. |
(2) |
Only reflects amounts directly related to oil and gas producing properties and, therefore, does not agree with taxes other than income reflected on Note 13Business Segment Information. |
(3) |
2014 and 2013 includes a noncontrolling interest in Egypt. |
(4) |
2013 and 2012 amounts have been recast to exclude discontinued operations. |
F-50
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Property Acquisitions, Exploration, and Development Activities
F-51
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Capitalized Costs
The following table sets forth the capitalized costs and associated accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization, including impairments, relating to the Companys oil and gas production, exploration, and development activities:
United States | Canada | Egypt(1) | Australia | North Sea | Argentina |
Other
International |
Total(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved properties |
$ | 47,001 | $ | 14,003 | $ | 9,895 | $ | 8,289 | $ | 10,463 | $ | | $ | 201 | $ | 89,852 | ||||||||||||||||
Unproved properties |
4,151 | 1,090 | 529 | 549 | 672 | | 23 | 7,014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
51,152 | 15,093 | 10,424 | 8,838 | 11,135 | | 224 | 96,866 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated DD&A |
(27,205 | ) | (9,653 | ) | (6,369 | ) | (3,198 | ) | (6,375 | ) | | (201 | ) | (53,001 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 23,947 | $ | 5,440 | $ | 4,055 | $ | 5,640 | $ | 4,760 | $ | | $ | 23 | $ | 43,865 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved properties |
$ | 41,904 | $ | 13,231 | $ | 8,418 | $ | 7,298 | $ | 9,378 | $ | 2,933 | $ | 228 | $ | 83,390 | ||||||||||||||||
Unproved properties |
5,042 | 1,116 | 660 | 471 | 702 | 349 | 23 | 8,363 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
46,946 | 14,347 | 9,078 | 7,769 | 10,080 | 3,282 | 251 | 91,753 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated DD&A |
(20,745 | ) | (9,310 | ) | (5,356 | ) | (2,839 | ) | (4,811 | ) | (1,964 | ) | (228 | ) | (45,253 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 26,201 | $ | 5,037 | $ | 3,722 | $ | 4,930 | $ | 5,269 | $ | 1,318 | $ | 23 | $ | 46,500 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
(1) Includes a noncontrolling interest in Egypt. |
|
Costs Not Being Amortized
The following table sets forth a summary of oil and gas property costs not being amortized at December 31, 2014, by the year in which such costs were incurred. There are no individually significant properties or significant development projects included in costs not being amortized. The majority of the evaluation activities are expected to be completed within five to ten years.
Total | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
2011
and Prior |
||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Property acquisition costs |
$ | 5,013 | $ | 1,770 | $ | 242 | $ | 2,079 | $ | 922 | ||||||||||
Exploration and development |
1,777 | 1,285 | 402 | 65 | 25 | |||||||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
224 | 43 | 43 | 47 | 91 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,014 | $ | 3,098 | $ | 687 | $ | 2,191 | $ | 1,038 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas Reserve Information
Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of natural gas, crude oil, condensate, and natural gas liquids (NGLs) that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing conditions, operating conditions, and government regulations. Estimated proved developed oil and gas reserves can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. The Company reports all estimated proved reserves held under production-sharing arrangements utilizing the economic interest method, which excludes the host countrys share of reserves.
F-52
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Estimated reserves that can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques are included in the proved classification when successful testing by a pilot project or the operation of an active, improved recovery program using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty for the engineering analysis on which the project or program is based. Economically producible means a resource which generates revenue that exceeds, or is reasonably expected to exceed, the costs of the operation. Reasonable certainty means a high degree of confidence that the quantities will be recovered. Reliable technology is a grouping of one or more technologies (including computational methods) that has been field-tested and has been demonstrated to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability in the formation being evaluated or in an analogous formation. In estimating its proved reserves, Apache uses several different traditional methods that can be classified in three general categories: 1) performance-based methods; 2) volumetric-based methods; and 3) analogy with similar properties. Apache will, at times, utilize additional technical analysis such as computer reservoir models, petrophysical techniques, and proprietary 3-D seismic interpretation methods to provide additional support for more complex reservoirs. Information from this additional analysis is combined with traditional methods outlined above to enhance the certainty of our reserve estimates.
F-53
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves and projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures. The reserve data in the following tables only represent estimates and should not be construed as being exact.
Crude Oil and Condensate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Thousands of barrels) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States | Canada | Egypt(1) | Australia | North Sea | Argentina | Total(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved developed reserves: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
428,251 | 81,846 | 105,840 | 35,725 | 136,990 | 16,001 | 804,653 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2012 |
474,837 | 79,695 | 106,746 | 29,053 | 119,635 | 15,845 | 825,811 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 |
457,981 | 80,526 | 119,242 | 22,524 | 100,327 | 14,195 | 794,795 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2014 |
444,440 | 75,876 | 128,712 | 29,996 | 105,746 | | 784,770 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proved undeveloped reserves: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
205,763 | 59,746 | 22,195 | 32,220 | 32,415 | 4,585 | 356,924 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2012 |
203,068 | 70,650 | 17,288 | 34,808 | 28,019 | 2,981 | 356,814 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 |
195,835 | 56,366 | 16,302 | 36,703 | 29,253 | 2,231 | 336,690 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2014 |
170,125 | 59,923 | 14,617 | 25,775 | 19,059 | | 289,499 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total proved reserves: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2011 |
634,014 | 141,591 | 128,035 | 67,945 | 169,405 | 20,587 | 1,161,577 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions |
84,656 | 18,935 | 36,188 | 6,277 | 346 | 1,133 | 147,535 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of minerals in-place |
15,942 | 188 | | 276 | 2,143 | | 18,549 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(7,474 | ) | (4,577 | ) | (3,678 | ) | (66 | ) | (928 | ) | 671 | (16,052 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Production |
(49,089 | ) | (5,792 | ) | (36,511 | ) | (10,571 | ) | (23,312 | ) | (3,565 | ) | (128,840 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Sale of properties |
(144 | ) | | | | | | (144 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2012 |
677,905 | 150,345 | 124,034 | 63,861 | 147,654 | 18,826 | 1,182,625 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions |
133,227 | 10,177 | 43,738 | 2,539 | 1,543 | 998 | 192,222 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of minerals in-place |
85 | | 5 | | 3,623 | | 3,713 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
1,683 | (531 | ) | 457 | (118 | ) | 18 | 24 | 1,533 | |||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(53,621 | ) | (6,469 | ) | (32,690 | ) | (7,055 | ) | (23,258 | ) | (3,422 | ) | (126,515 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Sale of properties |
(105,463 | ) | (16,630 | ) | | | | | (122,093 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2013 |
653,816 | 136,892 | 135,544 | 59,227 | 129,580 | 16,426 | 1,131,485 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions |
57,011 | 9,657 | 38,074 | 4,254 | 17,386 | 5 | 126,387 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of minerals in-place |
15,240 | | | | | | 15,240 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
3,083 | (812 | ) | 1,801 | (216 | ) | (7 | ) | | 3,849 | ||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(48,789 | ) | (6,421 | ) | (32,090 | ) | (7,494 | ) | (22,154 | ) | (620 | ) | (117,568 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Sale of properties |
(65,796 | ) | (3,517 | ) | | | | (15,811 | ) | (85,124 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2014 |
614,565 | 135,799 | 143,329 | 55,771 | 124,805 | | 1,074,269 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
2014 and 2013 includes proved reserves of 48 MMbbls and 45 MMbbls, respectively, attributable to a noncontrolling interest in Egypt. |
F-54
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Natural Gas Liquids | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Thousands of barrels) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States | Canada | Egypt(1) | Australia | North Sea | Argentina | Total(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved developed reserves: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
107,490 | 23,256 | | | 8,753 | 5,939 | 145,438 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2012 |
154,508 | 21,996 | | | 2,438 | 5,007 | 183,949 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 |
184,485 | 26,099 | | | 2,435 | 4,110 | 217,129 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2014 |
183,565 | 17,947 | 1,346 | | 1,770 | | 204,628 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proved undeveloped reserves: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
52,543 | 8,193 | | | 509 | 1,215 | 62,460 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2012 |
60,889 | 12,258 | | | 380 | 876 | 74,403 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 |
63,538 | 9,970 | | | 215 | 1,009 | 74,732 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2014 |
69,828 | 7,168 | 212 | | 371 | | 77,579 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total proved reserves: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2011 |
160,033 | 31,450 | | | 9,262 | 7,153 | 207,898 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions |
71,965 | 7,655 | | | 246 | | 79,866 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of minerals in-place |
230 | 9 | | | 231 | | 470 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(4,559 | ) | (2,569 | ) | | | (6,329 | ) | (169 | ) | (13,626 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Production |
(12,272 | ) | (2,291 | ) | | | (592 | ) | (1,101 | ) | (16,256 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2012 |
215,397 | 34,254 | | | 2,818 | 5,883 | 258,352 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions |
69,231 | 4,014 | | | | | 73,245 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of minerals in-place |
45 | | | | 295 | | 340 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
1,591 | 546 | | | 1 | 3 | 2,141 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(19,922 | ) | (2,442 | ) | | | (464 | ) | (767 | ) | (23,595 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Sale of properties |
(18,319 | ) | (303 | ) | | | | | (18,622 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2013 |
248,023 | 36,069 | | | 2,650 | 5,119 | 291,861 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions |
47,516 | 1,163 | 1,820 | | 1 | | 50,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of minerals in-place |
2,916 | | | | | | 2,916 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
2,594 | 116 | (17 | ) | | (2 | ) | | 2,691 | |||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(21,464 | ) | (2,256 | ) | (245 | ) | | (508 | ) | (116 | ) | (24,589 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Sale of properties |
(26,192 | ) | (9,977 | ) | | | | (5,003 | ) | (41,172 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2014 |
253,393 | 25,115 | 1,558 | | 2,141 | | 282,207 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
2014 includes proved reserves of 519 Mbbls attributable to a noncontrolling interest in Egypt. |
F-55
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Natural Gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of cubic feet) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States | Canada | Egypt(1) | Australia |
North
Sea |
Argentina | Total(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved developed reserves: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
2,215,973 | 2,108,801 | 700,866 | 675,618 | 105,028 | 447,132 | 6,253,418 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2012 |
2,353,587 | 1,734,657 | 690,436 | 596,052 | 93,319 | 365,054 | 5,833,105 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 |
2,005,966 | 1,294,420 | 621,825 | 626,543 | 88,177 | 289,133 | 4,926,064 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2014 |
1,616,504 | 990,145 | 637,187 | 640,265 | 87,259 | | 3,971,360 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proved undeveloped reserves: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
760,238 | 1,438,710 | 282,100 | 893,966 | 3,414 | 90,427 | 3,468,855 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2012 |
832,320 | 403,227 | 205,055 | 1,074,018 | 18,985 | 97,496 | 2,631,101 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 |
667,160 | 439,037 | 190,355 | 975,224 | 18,988 | 121,584 | 2,412,348 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2014 |
580,299 | 527,623 | 171,696 | 964,554 | 23,228 | | 2,267,400 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total proved reserves: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2011 |
2,976,211 | 3,547,511 | 982,966 | 1,569,584 | 108,442 | 537,559 | 9,722,273 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions |
365,863 | 252,130 | 55,967 | 176,969 | 16,397 | 2,623 | 869,949 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of minerals in-place |
313,885 | 2,503 | | 1,745 | 8,494 | | 326,627 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(156,840 | ) | (1,443,989 | ) | (13,974 | ) | 101 | | 496 | (1,614,206 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Production |
(312,600 | ) | (219,849 | ) | (129,468 | ) | (78,329 | ) | (21,029 | ) | (78,128 | ) | (839,403 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Sale of properties |
(612 | ) | (422 | ) | | | | | (1,034 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2012 |
3,185,907 | 2,137,884 | 895,491 | 1,670,070 | 112,304 | 462,550 | 8,464,206 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions |
306,721 | 359,493 | 44,382 | 13,351 | 2,750 | 16,515 | 743,212 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of minerals in-place |
855 | | | | 10,680 | | 11,535 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
61,247 | 109,551 | 2,413 | (101 | ) | 32 | 49 | 173,191 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(285,187 | ) | (181,593 | ) | (130,106 | ) | (81,553 | ) | (18,601 | ) | (68,397 | ) | (765,437 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Sale of properties |
(596,417 | ) | (691,878 | ) | | | | | (1,288,295 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2013 |
2,673,126 | 1,733,457 | 812,180 | 1,601,767 | 107,165 | 410,717 | 7,338,412 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions |
203,318 | 383,077 | 125,899 | 81,156 | 23,803 | | 817,253 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of minerals in-place |
21,337 | | | | | | 21,337 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
35,910 | (12,626 | ) | 5,949 | | (54 | ) | | 29,179 | |||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(215,829 | ) | (117,816 | ) | (135,145 | ) | (78,104 | ) | (20,427 | ) | (12,722 | ) | (580,043 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Sale of properties |
(521,059 | ) | (468,324 | ) | | | | (397,995 | ) | (1,387,378 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2014 |
2,196,803 | 1,517,768 | 808,883 | 1,604,819 | 110,487 | | 6,238,760 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
2014 and 2013 include proved reserves of 270 Bcf and 271 Bcf, respectively, attributable to a noncontrolling interest in Egypt. |
F-56
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Total Equivalent Reserves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Thousands barrels of oil equivalent) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States | Canada | Egypt(1) | Australia |
North
Sea |
Argentina | Total(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved developed reserves: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
905,069 | 456,569 | 222,651 | 148,328 | 163,248 | 96,462 | 1,992,327 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2012 |
1,021,610 | 390,800 | 221,819 | 128,395 | 137,626 | 81,695 | 1,981,945 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 |
976,795 | 322,362 | 222,880 | 126,948 | 117,457 | 66,494 | 1,832,936 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2014 |
897,422 | 258,848 | 236,256 | 136,707 | 122,058 | | 1,651,291 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proved undeveloped reserves: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
385,013 | 307,724 | 69,212 | 181,214 | 33,493 | 20,871 | 997,527 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2012 |
402,677 | 150,113 | 51,464 | 213,811 | 31,563 | 20,106 | 869,734 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 |
370,566 | 139,509 | 48,028 | 199,240 | 32,633 | 23,504 | 813,480 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2014 |
336,670 | 155,028 | 43,446 | 186,534 | 23,301 | | 744,979 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total proved reserves: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2011 |
1,290,082 | 764,293 | 291,863 | 329,542 | 196,741 | 117,333 | 2,989,854 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions |
217,598 | 68,612 | 45,516 | 35,772 | 3,325 | 1,570 | 372,393 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of minerals in-place |
68,486 | 614 | | 567 | 3,790 | | 73,457 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(38,172 | ) | (247,811 | ) | (6,007 | ) | (49 | ) | (7,258 | ) | 585 | (298,712 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Production |
(113,461 | ) | (44,725 | ) | (58,089 | ) | (23,626 | ) | (27,409 | ) | (17,687 | ) | (284,997 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Sale of properties |
(246 | ) | (70 | ) | | | | | (316 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2012 |
1,424,287 | 540,913 | 273,283 | 342,206 | 169,189 | 101,801 | 2,851,679 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions |
253,578 | 74,107 | 51,135 | 4,764 | 2,001 | 3,751 | 389,336 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of minerals in-place |
273 | | 5 | | 5,698 | | 5,976 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
13,482 | 18,274 | 859 | (135 | ) | 24 | 35 | 32,539 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(121,074 | ) | (39,177 | ) | (54,374 | ) | (20,647 | ) | (26,822 | ) | (15,589 | ) | (277,683 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Sale of properties |
(223,185 | ) | (132,246 | ) | | | | | (355,431 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2013 |
1,347,361 | 461,871 | 270,908 | 326,188 | 150,090 | 89,998 | 2,646,416 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions |
138,413 | 74,666 | 60,877 | 17,780 | 21,354 | 5 | 313,095 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of minerals in-place |
21,712 | | | | | | 21,712 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
11,662 | (2,800 | ) | 2,776 | (216 | ) | (18 | ) | | 11,404 | ||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(106,225 | ) | (28,313 | ) | (54,859 | ) | (20,511 | ) | (26,067 | ) | (2,856 | ) | (238,831 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Sale of properties |
(178,831 | ) | (91,548 | ) | | | | (87,147 | ) | (357,526 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2014 |
1,234,092 | 413,876 | 279,702 | 323,241 | 145,359 | | 2,396,270 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
2014 and 2013 include total proved reserves of 93 MMboe and 90 MMboe, respectively, attributable to a noncontrolling interest in Egypt. |
During 2014, Apache added 22 MMboe of estimated proved reserves through purchases of minerals in-place. We sold 357 MMboe through several divestiture transactions, including all of our operations in Argentina and certain fields in Canada, the Anadarko basin, southern Louisiana, and the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. During 2014, Apache also added 313 MMboe from extensions, discoveries and other additions. In the U.S., the Company recorded 138 MMboe primarily associated with drilling successes in the Permian and Anadarko basins, which added 94 MMboe and 18 MMboe, respectively, and 22 MMboe from the Eagle Ford shale. In Canada, additions of 75 MMboe were primarily a result of drilling activity for liquids-rich gas targets in the Kaybob field area, horizontal drilling in our House Mountain waterflood units, extensions of the Glauconitic trend in our West
F-57
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5 area and shallow oil drilling in Brownfield and Consort field areas. Egypt contributed 61 MMboe from exploration and appraisal activity in the West Kalabsha, Shushan, Khalda and Ras Kanayes concessions along with continued development of the Razzak, Abu Gharadig and Meghar fields. The Australia and North Sea regions contributed 39 MMboe from their combined drilling programs.
Approximately 9 percent of Apaches year-end 2014 estimated proved developed reserves are classified as proved not producing. These reserves relate to zones that are either behind pipe, or that have been completed but not yet produced, or zones that have been produced in the past, but are not now producing because of mechanical reasons. These reserves are considered to be a lower tier of reserves than producing reserves because they are frequently based on volumetric calculations rather than performance data. Future production associated with behind pipe reserves is scheduled to follow depletion of the currently producing zones in the same wellbores. Additional capital may have to be spent to access these reserves. The capital and economic impact of production timing are reflected in this Note 14, under Future Net Cash Flows.
Future Net Cash Flows
Future cash inflows as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 were calculated using an unweighted arithmetic average of oil and gas prices in effect on the first day of each month in the respective year, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements. Operating costs, production and ad valorem taxes and future development costs are based on current costs with no escalation.
The following table sets forth unaudited information concerning future net cash flows for proved oil and gas reserves, net of income tax expense. Income tax expense has been computed using expected future tax rates and giving effect to tax deductions and credits available, under current laws, and which relate to oil and gas producing activities. This information does not purport to present the fair market value of the Companys oil and gas assets, but does present a standardized disclosure concerning possible future net cash flows that would result under the assumptions used.
United States | Canada | Egypt(2) | Australia | North Sea | Argentina | Total(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash inflows |
$ | 73,859 | $ | 18,966 | $ | 16,802 | $ | 19,391 | $ | 13,916 | $ | | $ | 142,934 | ||||||||||||||
Production costs |
(25,875 | ) | (7,537 | ) | (2,924 | ) | (4,105 | ) | (7,121 | ) | | (47,562 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Development costs |
(4,422 | ) | (2,453 | ) | (1,683 | ) | (1,173 | ) | (2,776 | ) | | (12,507 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(10,657 | ) | (1,070 | ) | (4,091 | ) | (3,202 | ) | (2,445 | ) | | (21,465 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net cash flows |
32,905 | 7,906 | 8,104 | 10,911 | 1,574 | | 61,400 | |||||||||||||||||||||
10 percent discount rate |
(17,639 | ) | (3,983 | ) | (2,099 | ) | (5,875 | ) | (146 | ) | | (29,742 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Discounted future net cash flows(1) |
$ | 15,266 | $ | 3,923 | $ | 6,005 | $ | 5,036 | $ | 1,428 | $ | | $ | 31,658 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash inflows |
$ | 79,654 | $ | 19,260 | $ | 16,864 | $ | 20,637 | $ | 15,359 | $ | 2,824 | $ | 154,598 | ||||||||||||||
Production costs |
(26,032 | ) | (8,105 | ) | (2,590 | ) | (4,494 | ) | (8,147 | ) | (1,176 | ) | (50,544 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Development costs |
(4,834 | ) | (2,458 | ) | (1,899 | ) | (2,283 | ) | (3,284 | ) | (397 | ) | (15,155 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(12,832 | ) | (678 | ) | (4,328 | ) | (3,072 | ) | (2,376 | ) | (142 | ) | (23,428 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net cash flows |
35,956 | 8,019 | 8,047 | 10,788 | 1,552 | 1,109 | 65,471 | |||||||||||||||||||||
10 percent discount rate |
(20,117 | ) | (3,987 | ) | (2,193 | ) | (6,423 | ) | 85 | (242 | ) | (32,877 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Discounted future net cash flows(1) |
$ | 15,839 | $ | 4,032 | $ | 5,854 | $ | 4,365 | $ | 1,637 | $ | 867 | $ | 32,594 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-58
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(1) |
Estimated future net cash flows before income tax expense, discounted at 10 percent per annum, totaled approximately $43.0 billion and $45.4 billion as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
(2) |
Includes discounted future net cash flows of approximately $2.00 billion and $1.95 billion in 2014 and 2013, respectively, attributable to a noncontrolling interest in Egypt. |
The following table sets forth the principal sources of change in the discounted future net cash flows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Sales, net of production costs |
$ | (10,350 | ) | $ | (12,271 | ) | $ | (12,589 | ) | |||
Net change in prices and production costs |
(1,029 | ) | 1,438 | (1,941 | ) | |||||||
Discoveries and improved recovery, net of related costs |
6,297 | 6,892 | 6,742 | |||||||||
Change in future development costs |
(1,136 | ) | (2,017 | ) | (935 | ) | ||||||
Previously estimated development costs incurred during the period |
4,462 | 4,654 | 4,359 | |||||||||
Revision of quantities |
256 | 500 | (4,065 | ) | ||||||||
Purchases of minerals in-place |
508 | 227 | 1,181 | |||||||||
Accretion of discount |
4,442 | 4,823 | 5,234 | |||||||||
Change in income taxes |
836 | 855 | 2,711 | |||||||||
Sales of properties |
(4,780 | ) | (6,232 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||
Change in production rates and other |
(442 | ) | (828 | ) | (2,088 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
$ | (936 | ) | $ | (1,959 | ) | $ | (1,394 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. SUPPLEMENTAL QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)
First | Second | Third | Fourth | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues and other |
$ | 3,675 | $ | 3,484 | $ | 3,740 | $ | 2,952 | $ | 13,851 | ||||||||||
Expenses(2)(3) |
2,824 | 2,871 | 4,981 | 7,718 | 18,394 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations including noncontrolling interest |
851 | 613 | (1,241 | ) | (4,766 | ) | (4,543 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
(517 | ) | | | | (517 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest |
$ | 334 | $ | 613 | $ | (1,241 | ) | $ | (4,766 | ) | $ | (5,060 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock |
$ | 236 | $ | 505 | $ | (1,330 | ) | $ | (4,814 | ) | $ | (5,403 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Basic net income (loss) per common share(1): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 1.92 | $ | 1.31 | $ | (3.50 | ) | $ | (12.78 | ) | $ | (12.72 | ) | |||||||
Net loss from discontinued operations |
(1.32 | ) | | | | (1.34 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.60 | $ | 1.31 | $ | (3.50 | ) | $ | (12.78 | ) | $ | (14.06 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per common share(1): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 1.90 | $ | 1.31 | $ | (3.50 | ) | $ | (12.78 | ) | $ | (12.72 | ) | |||||||
Net loss from discontinued operations |
(1.30 | ) | | | | (1.34 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.60 | $ | 1.31 | $ | (3.50 | ) | $ | (12.78 | ) | $ | (14.06 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-59
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
First | Second | Third | Fourth | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues and other |
$ | 3,946 | $ | 4,268 | $ | 3,900 | $ | 3,446 | $ | 15,560 | ||||||||||
Expenses(2) |
3,168 | 3,231 | 3,464 | 3,217 | 13,080 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations including noncontrolling interest |
778 | 1,037 | 436 | 229 | 2,480 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
(61 | ) | (2 | ) | (130 | ) | 1 | (192 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income including noncontrolling interest |
$ | 717 | $ | 1,035 | $ | 306 | $ | 230 | $ | 2,288 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stock |
$ | 698 | $ | 1,016 | $ | 300 | $ | 174 | $ | 2,188 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Basic net income per common share(1): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 1.94 | $ | 2.60 | $ | 1.08 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 6.02 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
(0.16 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.33 | ) | 0.01 | (0.49 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income per share |
$ | 1.78 | $ | 2.59 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 5.53 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Diluted net income per common share(1): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 1.91 | $ | 2.54 | $ | 1.07 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 5.97 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
(0.15 | ) | | (0.32 | ) | | (0.47 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income per share |
$ | 1.76 | $ | 2.54 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 5.50 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The sum of the individual quarterly net income per common share amounts may not agree with full-year net income per common share as each quarterly computation is based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during that period. |
(2) |
In 2014, operating expenses include non-cash write-downs of the Companys oil and gas properties totaling $3.1 billion, net of tax, in the U.S. and North Sea regions. In 2013, operating expenses include non-cash write-downs of the Companys oil and gas properties totaling $541 million, net of tax, in the U.S. and North Sea regions and also the Companys exit of operations in Kenya. |
(3) |
In the fourth quarter of 2014, operating expenses include non-cash asset impairments totaling $2.4 billion, including $1.3 billion for the impairment of goodwill, $1.0 billion for the impairment of assets held for sale, and other asset impairments. |
16. SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION
In December 1999, Apache Finance Canada issued approximately $300 million of publicly-traded notes due in 2029, which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Apache. The following condensed consolidating financial statements are provided as an alternative to filing separate financial statements.
Apache Finance Canada is 100 percent owned by Apache Corporation. As such, these condensed consolidating financial statements should be read in conjunction with Apaches consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, of which this note is an integral part.
F-60
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
Apache
Corporation |
Apache
Finance Canada |
All
Other
Subsidiaries of Apache Corporation |
Reclassifications
& Eliminations |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
REVENUES AND OTHER: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas production revenues |
$ | 3,399 | $ | | $ | 10,350 | $ | | $ | 13,749 | ||||||||||
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates |
25 | (209 | ) | 73 | 111 | | ||||||||||||||
Derivative instrument losses, net |
141 | | 143 | | 284 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
54 | 55 | (296 | ) | 5 | (182 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
3,619 | (154 | ) | 10,270 | 116 | 13,851 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization |
5,845 | | 4,313 | | 10,158 | |||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
31 | | 150 | | 181 | |||||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses |
509 | | 1,970 | | 2,479 | |||||||||||||||
Gathering and transportation |
58 | | 215 | | 273 | |||||||||||||||
Taxes other than income |
206 | | 472 | | 678 | |||||||||||||||
Impairments |
175 | | 2,182 | | 2,357 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
377 | | 52 | 5 | 434 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition, divestiture, and separation costs |
67 | | | | 67 | |||||||||||||||
Financing costs, net |
158 | (24 | ) | (4 | ) | | 130 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
7,426 | (24 | ) | 9,350 | 5 | 16,757 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
(3,807 | ) | (130 | ) | 920 | 111 | (2,906 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
1,472 | 6 | 159 | | 1,637 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTEREST |
(5,279 | ) | (136 | ) | 761 | 111 | (4,543 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
(127 | ) | | (390 | ) | | (517 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTEREST |
(5,406 | ) | (136 | ) | 371 | 111 | (5,060 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
| | 343 | | 343 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK |
$ | (5,406 | ) | $ | (136 | ) | $ | 28 | $ | 111 | $ | (5,403 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK |
$ | (5,407 | ) | $ | (136 | ) | $ | 28 | $ | 111 | $ | (5,404 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-61
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
Apache
Corporation |
Apache
Finance Canada |
All Other
Subsidiaries of Apache Corporation |
Reclassifications
& Eliminations |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
REVENUES AND OTHER: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas production revenues |
$ | 4,585 | $ | | $ | 11,326 | $ | | $ | 15,911 | ||||||||||
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates |
2,313 | 17 | 36 | (2,366 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Derivative instrument losses, net |
(399 | ) | | | | (399 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other |
| 61 | (9 | ) | (4 | ) | 48 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
6,499 | 78 | 11,353 | (2,370 | ) | 15,560 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization |
2,250 | | 4,039 | | 6,289 | |||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
67 | | 171 | | 238 | |||||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses |
939 | | 1,925 | | 2,864 | |||||||||||||||
Gathering and transportation |
61 | | 227 | | 288 | |||||||||||||||
Taxes other than income |
190 | | 595 | | 785 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
408 | | 78 | (4 | ) | 482 | ||||||||||||||
Acquisition, divestiture, and separation costs |
33 | | | | 33 | |||||||||||||||
Financing costs, net |
97 | 5 | 75 | | 177 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
4,045 | 5 | 7,110 | (4 | ) | 11,156 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
2,454 | 73 | 4,243 | (2,366 | ) | 4,404 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
222 | 20 | 1,682 | | 1,924 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTEREST |
2,232 | 53 | 2,561 | (2,366 | ) | 2,480 | ||||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | (192 | ) | | (192 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTEREST |
2,232 | 53 | 2,369 | (2,366 | ) | 2,288 | ||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
44 | | | | 44 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
| | 56 | | 56 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK |
$ | 2,188 | $ | 53 | $ | 2,313 | $ | (2,366 | ) | $ | 2,188 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK |
$ | 2,204 | $ | 53 | $ | 2,313 | $ | (2,366 | ) | $ | 2,204 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-62
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
Apache
Corporation |
Apache
Finance Canada |
All Other
Subsidiaries of Apache Corporation |
Reclassifications
& Eliminations |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
REVENUES AND OTHER: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas production revenues |
$ | 4,237 | $ | | $ | 12,191 | $ | | $ | 16,428 | ||||||||||
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates |
1,523 | (737 | ) | 248 | (1,034 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Other |
(80 | ) | 69 | 151 | (4 | ) | 136 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
5,680 | (668 | ) | 12,590 | (1,038 | ) | 16,564 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization |
1,391 | | 5,490 | | 6,881 | |||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
76 | | 152 | | 228 | |||||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses |
957 | | 1,827 | | 2,784 | |||||||||||||||
Gathering and transportation |
51 | | 244 | | 295 | |||||||||||||||
Taxes other than income |
185 | | 633 | | 818 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
425 | | 94 | (4 | ) | 515 | ||||||||||||||
Acquisition, divestiture, and separation costs |
25 | | 6 | | 31 | |||||||||||||||
Financing costs, net |
94 | (20 | ) | 98 | | 172 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
3,204 | (20 | ) | 8,544 | (4 | ) | 11,724 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
2,476 | (648 | ) | 4,046 | (1,034 | ) | 4,840 | |||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
475 | (159 | ) | 2,537 | | 2,853 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTEREST |
2,001 | (489 | ) | 1,509 | (1,034 | ) | 1,987 | |||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | 14 | | 14 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTEREST |
2,001 | (489 | ) | 1,523 | (1,034 | ) | 2,001 | |||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
76 | | | | 76 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK |
$ | 1,925 | $ | (489 | ) | $ | 1,523 | $ | (1,034 | ) | $ | 1,925 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK |
$ | 1,803 | $ | (489 | ) | $ | 1,523 | $ | (1,034 | ) | $ | 1,803 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-63
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
Apache
Corporation |
Apache
Finance Canada |
All Other
Subsidiaries of Apache Corporation |
Reclassifications
& Eliminations |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY CONTINUING OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
$ | 6,691 | $ | 17 | $ | 1,671 | $ | | $ | 8,379 | ||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
| | 82 | | 82 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
6,691 | 17 | 1,753 | | 8,461 | |||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to oil and gas property |
(9,706 | ) | | (15 | ) | | (9,721 | ) | ||||||||||||
Additions to gas gathering, transmission, and processing facilities |
49 | | (1,208 | ) | | (1,159 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of Deepwater Gulf of Mexico assets |
1,360 | | | | 1,360 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of Anadarko Basin and Southern Louisiana assets |
1,262 | | | | 1,262 | |||||||||||||||
Leasehold and property acquisitions |
(1,087 | ) | | (405 | ) | | (1,492 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties |
15 | | 455 | | 470 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries, net |
2,168 | | | (2,168 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other |
(278 | ) | | 6 | | (272 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN CONTINUING INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(6,217 | ) | | (1,167 | ) | (2,168 | ) | (9,552 | ) | |||||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
| | 748 | | 748 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(6,217 | ) | | (419 | ) | (2,168 | ) | (8,804 | ) | |||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial paper, credit facility, and bank notes, net |
1,570 | | (2 | ) | | 1,568 | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany borrowings |
| 8 | (2,188 | ) | 2,180 | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends paid |
(365 | ) | | | | (365 | ) | |||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
| | (140 | ) | | (140 | ) | |||||||||||||
Treasury stock activity, net |
(1,864 | ) | | | | (1,864 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other |
(5 | ) | (28 | ) | 94 | (12 | ) | 49 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN CONTINUING FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
(664 | ) | (20 | ) | (2,236 | ) | 2,168 | (752 | ) | |||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
| | (42 | ) | | (42 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
(664 | ) | (20 | ) | (2,278 | ) | 2,168 | (794 | ) | |||||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(190 | ) | (3 | ) | (944 | ) | | (1,137 | ) | |||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR |
155 | 3 | 1,748 | | 1,906 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | (35 | ) | $ | | $ | 804 | $ | | $ | 769 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-64
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
Apache
Corporation |
Apache
Finance Canada |
All Other
Subsidiaries of Apache Corporation |
Reclassifications
& Eliminations |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY CONTINUING OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
$ | 1,421 | $ | 315 | $ | 7,867 | $ | | $ | 9,603 | ||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
| | 232 | | 232 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
1,421 | 315 | 8,099 | | 9,835 | |||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to oil and gas property |
(4,096 | ) | | (5,516 | ) | | (9,612 | ) | ||||||||||||
Additions to gas gathering, transmission, and processing facilities |
(124 | ) | | (1,066 | ) | | (1,190 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from divestiture of Gulf of Mexico Shelf properties |
3,702 | | | | 3,702 | |||||||||||||||
Leasehold and property acquisitions |
(195 | ) | | (224 | ) | | (419 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from Kitimat LNG transaction, net |
| | 396 | | 396 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties |
| | 307 | | 307 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
(58 | ) | | (32 | ) | | (90 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN CONTINUING INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(771 | ) | | (6,135 | ) | | (6,906 | ) | ||||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
| | (210 | ) | | (210 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(771 | ) | | (6,345 | ) | | (7,116 | ) | ||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial paper, credit facility, and bank notes, net |
(501 | ) | | (8 | ) | | (509 | ) | ||||||||||||
Intercompany borrowings |
3,056 | 1 | (3,057 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Payments on fixed rate debt |
(1,722 | ) | (350 | ) | | | (2,072 | ) | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid |
(360 | ) | | | | (360 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interest |
| | 2,948 | | 2,948 | |||||||||||||||
Shares repurchased |
(997 | ) | | | | (997 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other |
29 | 37 | (45 | ) | | 21 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN CONTINUING FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
(495 | ) | (312 | ) | (162 | ) | | (969 | ) | |||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
| | (4 | ) | | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
(495 | ) | (312 | ) | (166 | ) | | (973 | ) | |||||||||||
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
155 | 3 | 1,588 | | 1,746 | |||||||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR |
| | 160 | | 160 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | 155 | $ | 3 | $ | 1,748 | $ | | $ | 1,906 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-65
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
Apache
Corporation |
Apache
Finance Canada |
All Other
Subsidiaries of Apache Corporation |
Reclassifications
& Eliminations |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) CONTINUING OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
$ | 2,357 | $ | (40 | ) | $ | 5,964 | $ | | $ | 8,281 | |||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
| | 223 | | 223 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
2,357 | (40 | ) | 6,187 | | 8,504 | ||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to oil and gas property |
(2,308 | ) | | (5,120 | ) | | (7,428 | ) | ||||||||||||
Additions to gas gathering, transmission, and processing facilities |
(48 | ) | | (685 | ) | | (733 | ) | ||||||||||||
Acquisition of Cordillera |
(2,666 | ) | | | | (2,666 | ) | |||||||||||||
Equity investment in Yara Pilbara Holdings Pty Limited |
| | (439 | ) | | (439 | ) | |||||||||||||
Leasehold and property acquisitions |
(1,071 | ) | | (232 | ) | | (1,303 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties |
25 | | 2 | | 27 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries, net |
(657 | ) | | | 657 | | ||||||||||||||
Other |
(450 | ) | | (105 | ) | | (555 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) CONTINUING INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(7,175 | ) | | (6,579 | ) | 657 | (13,097 | ) | ||||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
| | (327 | ) | | (327 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(7,175 | ) | | (6,906 | ) | 657 | (13,424 | ) | ||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial paper, credit facility, and bank notes, net |
502 | | 9 | | 511 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany borrowings |
| | 697 | (697 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt borrowings |
4,978 | | | | 4,978 | |||||||||||||||
Payments on fixed rate debt |
(400 | ) | | | | (400 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends paid |
(332 | ) | | | | (332 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other |
29 | 35 | (114 | ) | 40 | (10 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) |
||||||||||||||||||||
CONTINUING FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
4,777 | 35 | 592 | (657 | ) | 4,747 | ||||||||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
| | 38 | | 38 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
4,777 | 35 | 630 | (657 | ) | 4,785 | ||||||||||||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(41 | ) | (5 | ) | (89 | ) | | (135 | ) | |||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR |
41 | 5 | 249 | | 295 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | | $ | | $ | 160 | $ | | $ | 160 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-66
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2014
F-67
APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2013
F-68
Board of Directors | Officers | |
G. Steven Farris Chairman of the Board, Apache Corporation
Annell R. Bay (2) Former Vice President Global Exploration Marathon Oil Corporation
A.D. Frazier, Jr. (3)(4) President, Georgia Oak Partners
Chansoo Joung (1)(2) Consultant and Former Partner, Warburg Pincus LLC
George D. Lawrence (3) Private Investor; Former Chief Executive Officer, The Phoenix Resource Companies, Inc.
John E. Lowe (3)(4) Former Executive Vice President, ConocoPhillips
William C. Montgomery (2)(3) Managing Director, Quantum Energy Partners
Amy H. Nelson (1) President and Founder, Greenridge Advisors, LLC
Rodman D. Patton (1) Former Managing Director, Merrill Lynch Energy Group
Charles J. Pitman (2)(4) Former Regional President Middle East/ Caspian/Egypt/India, BP Amoco plc
Peter A. Ragauss (1) Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Baker Hughes Incorporated |
John J. Christmann Chief Executive Officer and President
Thomas E. Voytovich Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer International
Michael S. Bahorich Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
Rodney J. Eichler Executive Advisor to the Chairman; Chief Executive Officer Kitimat LNG
Margery M. Harris Executive Vice President Human Resources
P. Anthony Lannie Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Financial Officer
W. Kregg Olson Executive Vice President Corporate Reservoir Engineering
Stephen J. Riney Executive Vice President
Matthew W. Dundrea Senior Vice President Treasury and Administration
Rebecca A. Hoyt Senior Vice President Chief Accounting Officer and Controller
Janine J. McArdle Senior Vice President Gas Monetization
Jon W. Sauer Senior Vice President Tax
Sarah B. Teslik Senior Vice President Communications, Public Affairs and Governance
Gary T. Clark Vice President Investor Relations
Jon A. Graham Vice President Health, Safety, Security and Environment
Rodney A. Gryder Vice President Audit
Aaron S.G. Merrick Vice President Information Technology
Urban F. OBrien Vice President Government Affairs
Cheri L. Peper Corporate Secretary |
(1) |
Audit Committee |
(2) |
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee |
(3) |
Management Development and Compensation Committee |
(4) |
Stock Plan Committee |
Shareholder Information
Stock Data
Price Range |
Dividends
per Share |
|||||||||||||||
High | Low | Declared | Paid | |||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 87.91 | $ | 77.31 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.20 | ||||||||
Second Quarter |
102.34 | 81.87 | 0.25 | 0.25 | ||||||||||||
Third Quarter |
104.57 | 92.84 | 0.25 | 0.25 | ||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
93.87 | 54.34 | 0.25 | 0.25 | ||||||||||||
2013 |
||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 86.35 | $ | 72.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.17 | ||||||||
Second Quarter |
87.57 | 67.91 | 0.20 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||
Third Quarter |
89.17 | 75.07 | 0.20 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
94.84 | 84.15 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
The Company has paid cash dividends on its common stock for 50 consecutive years through December 31, 2014. Future dividend payments will depend upon the Companys level of earnings, financial requirements and other relevant factors.
Apache common stock is listed on the New York and Chicago stock exchanges and the NASDAQ National Market (symbol APA). At December 31, 2014, the Companys shares of common stock outstanding were held by approximately 4,700 shareholders of record and 321,000 beneficial owners. Also listed on the New York Stock Exchange are Apache Finance Canadas 7.75% notes, due 2029 (symbol APA/29).
Corporate Offices
One Post Oak Central
2000 Post Oak Boulevard
Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77056-4400
(713) 296-6000
Independent Public Accountants
Ernst & Young LLP
Five Houston Center
1401 McKinney Street, Suite 1200
Houston, Texas 77010-2007
Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Attn: Shareowner Services
P.O. Box 64854
South St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0854
(651) 450-4064 or (800) 468-9716
Communications concerning the transfer of shares, lost certificates, dividend checks, duplicate mailings, or change of address should be directed to the stock transfer agent. Shareholders can access account information on the web site: www.shareowneronline.com
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Shareholders of record may invest their dividends automatically in additional shares of Apache common stock at the market price. Participants may also invest up to an additional $25,000 in Apache shares each quarter through this service. All bank service fees and brokerage commissions on purchases are paid by Apache. A prospectus describing the terms of the Plan and an authorization form may be obtained from the Companys stock transfer agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Direct Registration
Shareholders of record may hold their shares of Apache common stock in book-entry form. This eliminates costs related to safekeeping or replacing paper stock certificates. In addition, shareholders of record may request electronic movement of book-entry shares between your account with the Companys stock transfer agent and your broker. Stock certificates may be converted to book-entry shares at any time. Questions regarding this service may be directed to the Companys stock transfer agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Annual Meeting
Apache will hold its annual meeting of shareholders on Thursday, May 14, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. in the Ballroom, Hilton Houston Post Oak, 2001 Post Oak Boulevard, Houston, Texas. Apache plans to web cast the annual meeting live; connect through the Apache web site: www.apachecorp.com
Stock Held in Street Name
The Company maintains a direct mailing list to ensure that shareholders with stock held in brokerage accounts receive information on a timely basis. Shareholders wanting to be added to this list should direct their requests to Apaches Public and International Affairs Department, 2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100, Houston, Texas, 77056-4400 or by registering on Apaches web site: www.apachecorp.com
Form 10-K Request
Shareholders and other persons interested in obtaining, without cost, a copy of the Companys Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission may do so by writing to Cheri L. Peper, Corporate Secretary, 2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100, Houston, Texas, 77056-4400.
Investor Relations
Shareholders, brokers, securities analysts, or portfolio managers seeking information about the Company are welcome to contact Gary T. Clark., Vice President of Investor Relations, at (281) 302-2286.
Members of the news media and others seeking information about the Company should contact Apaches Public and International Affairs Department at (713) 296-7189.
Web site: www.apachecorp.com
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
2.1 | | Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between BP America Production Company and ZPZ Delaware I LLC dated July 20, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K/A, dated July 20, 2010, filed on July 21, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300) (the exhibits and schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K). | ||
2.2 | | Partnership Interest and Share Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between BP Canada Energy and Apache Canada Ltd. dated July 20, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K/A, dated July 20, 2010, filed on July 21, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300) (the exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K). | ||
2.3 | | Purchase and Sale Agreement by and among BP Egypt Company, BP Exploration (Delta) Limited and ZPZ Egypt Corporation LDC dated July 20, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K/A, dated July 20, 2010, filed on July 21, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300) (the exhibits and schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K). | ||
3.1 | | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, dated September 19, 2013, as filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on September 19, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 20, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
3.2 | | Bylaws of Registrant, as amended February 19, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2015, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.1 | | Form of Certificate for Registrants Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.2 | | Form of 3.625% Notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 30, 2010, filed on December 3, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.3 | | Form of 5.250% Notes due 2042 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 30, 2010, filed on December 3, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.4 | | Form of 5.100% Notes due 2040 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated August 17, 2010, filed on August 20, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.5 | | Form of 1.75% Notes due 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 3, 2012, filed on April 9, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.6 | | Form of 3.25% Note due 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 3, 2012, filed on April 9, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.7 | | Form of 4.75% Notes due 2043 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 3, 2012, filed on April 9, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.8 | | Form of 2.625% Notes due 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 28, 2012, filed on December 4, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). |
1
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
4.9 | | Form of 4.250% Notes due 2044 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 28, 2012, filed on December 4, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.10 | | Rights Agreement, dated January 31, 1996, between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (as successor-in-interest to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.), rights agent, relating to the declaration of a rights dividend to Registrants common shareholders of record on January 31, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (a) to Registrants Registration Statement on Form 8-A, dated January 24, 1996, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.11 | | Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 31, 2006, to the Rights Agreement dated as of January 31, 1996 between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (as successor-in-interest to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Registrants Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form 8-A, dated January 31, 2006, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.12 | | Amendment No. 2, dated March 10, 2014, to the Rights Agreement by and between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Amendment No. 2 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed March 10, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.13 | | Senior Indenture, dated February 15, 1996, between Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor-in-interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank), formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank, as trustee, governing the senior debt securities and guarantees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated May 23, 2003, Reg. No. 333-105536). | ||
4.14 | | First Supplemental Indenture to the Senior Indenture, dated as of November 5, 1996, between Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor-in-interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank), as trustee, governing the senior debt securities and guarantees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated May 23, 2003, Reg. No. 333-105536). | ||
4.15 | | Form of Indenture among Apache Finance Pty Ltd, Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor-in-interest to The Chase Manhattan Bank), as trustee, governing the debt securities and guarantees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated November 12, 1997, Reg. No. 333-339973). | ||
4.16 | | Form of Indenture among Registrant, Apache Finance Canada Corporation and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor-in-interest to The Chase Manhattan Bank), as trustee, governing the debt securities and guarantees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated November 12, 1999, Reg. No. 333-90147). | ||
4.17 | | Deposit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2010, between Registrants and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as depositary, on behalf of all holders from time to time of the receipts issued there under (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July 22, 2010, filed on July 28, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
4.18 | | Form of Depositary Receipt for the Depositary Shares (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July 22, 2010, filed on July 28, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). |
2
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
4.19 | | Senior Indenture, dated May 19, 2011, between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the senior debt securities of Apache Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated May 23, 2011, Reg. No. 333-174429). | ||
4.20 | | Senior Indenture, dated May 19, 2011, among Apache Finance Pty Ltd, Apache Corporation, as guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the senior debt securities of Apache Finance Pty Ltd and the related guarantees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated May 23, 2011, Reg. No. 333-174429). | ||
4.21 | | Senior Indenture, dated May 19, 2011, among Apache Finance Canada Corporation, Apache Corporation, as guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the senior debt securities of Apache Finance Corporation and the related guarantees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.20 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated May 23, 2011, Reg. No. 333-174429). | ||
4.22 | | Form of Apache Corporation November 10, 2010 First Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Certain Employees of Apache Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on November 10, 2010, Reg. No. 333-170533). | ||
4.23 | | Form of Apache Corporation November 10, 2010 Second Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Certain Employees of Apache Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on November 10, 2010, Reg. No. 333-170533). | ||
4.24 | | Form of Apache Corporation November 10, 2010 Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement for Certain Employees of Apache Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on November 10, 2010, Reg. No. 333-170533). | ||
10.1 | | Credit Agreement, dated August 12, 2011, among Registrant, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Citibank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 18, 2011, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.2 | | First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2013, among Apache Corporation, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the other agents party thereto, amending Credit Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2011, among the same parties (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.3 | | Credit Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2012, among Apache Corporation, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Global Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and Citibank, N.A., as Global Syndication Agents, and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and Royal Bank of Canada, as Global Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 7, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04300). | ||
10.4 | | Credit Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2012, among Apache Canada Ltd., the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Global Administrative Agent, Royal Bank of Canada, as Canadian Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and Citibank, N.A., as Global Syndication Agents, and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and Royal Bank of Canada, as Global Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 7, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04300). |
3
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
10.5 | | Syndicated Facility Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2012, among Apache Energy Limited (ACN 009 301 964), the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Global Administrative Agent, Citisecurities Limited (ABN 51 008 489 610), as Australian Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and Citibank, N.A., as Global Syndication Agents, and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and Royal Bank of Canada, as Global Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 7, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04300). | ||
10.6 | | Credit Agreement, dated December 11, 2014, among Registrant, the lenders party thereto, Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 15, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.7 | | Apache Corporation Corporate Incentive Compensation Plan A (Senior Officers Plan), dated July 16, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.8 | | First Amendment to Apache Corporation Corporate Incentive Compensation Plan A, dated November 20, 2008, effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2008, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.9 | | Apache Corporation Corporate Incentive Compensation Plan B (Strategic Objectives Format), dated July 16, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.10 | | First Amendment to Apache Corporation Corporate Incentive Compensation Plan B, dated November 20, 2008, effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2008, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.11 | | Apache Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan, as amended and restated, dated May 14, 2013, effective May 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.12 | | Amendment to Apache Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan, dated October 25, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.13 | | Amendment to Apache Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan, dated April 17, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300.) | ||
10.14 | | Amendment to Apache Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan, dated May 16, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.15 | | Non-Qualified Retirement/Savings Plan of Apache Corporation, as amended and restated July 14, 2010, except as otherwise specified (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.16 | | Amendment to Apache Corporation Non-Qualified Retirement/Savings Plan of Apache Corporation, dated December 19, 2011, effective January 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Registrants Annual Report Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2011, SEC File No. 001-4300). |
4
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
10.17 | | Amendment to Non-Qualified Retirement/Savings Plan of Apache Corporation, dated November 8, 2012, effective January 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.18 | | Non-Qualified Retirement/Savings Plan of Apache Corporation, as amended and restated, dated July 16, 2014, effective January 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.19 | | Non-Qualified Restorative Retirement Savings Plan of Apache Corporation, dated November 7, 2011, effective January 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8, dated December 21, 2011, Reg. No. 333-178672). | ||
10.20 | | Amendment to Non-Qualified Restorative Retirement Savings Plan of Apache Corporation, dated November 8, 2012, effective January 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.21 | | Non-Qualified Restorative Retirement Savings Plan of Apache Corporation, as amended and restated, dated July 16, 2014, effective January 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300) | ||
10.22 | | Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended and restated February 3, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.23 | | Apache Corporation 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended and restated May 4, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.24 | | Apache Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated May 5, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.25 | | Apache Corporation 2003 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan, as amended and restated September 16, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.26 | | Apache Corporation 2005 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated September 16, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 2013, Commission File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.27 | | Apache Corporation Income Continuance Plan, as amended and restated July 14, 2010, effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.28 | | Apache Corporation Deferred Delivery Plan, as amended and restated November 11, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.29 | | Apache Corporation Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan, as amended and restated February 6, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). |
5
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
10.30 | | Apache Corporation Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan, as amended and restated July 16, 2014, effective July 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.31 | | Apache Corporation Outside Directors Retirement Plan, as amended and restated February 6, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.32 | | Apache Corporation Outside Directors Retirement Plan, as amended and restated July 16, 2014, effective June 30, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.33 | | Apache Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended and restated February 8, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2007, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.34 | | Apache Corporation Non-Employee Directors Restricted Stock Units Program Specifications, dated May 5, 2011, pursuant to Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.35 | | Apache Corporation Non-Employee Directors Restricted Stock Units Program Specifications, as amended and restated May 15, 2013, pursuant to Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.36 | | Apache Corporation Non-Employee Directors Restricted Stock Units Program, as amended and restated July 16, 2014, pursuant to Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.37 | | Apache Corporation Outside Directors Deferral Program, effective July 16, 2014, pursuant to Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.38 | | Employment Agreement between Registrant and G. Steven Farris, dated June 6, 1988, and First Amendment, dated November 20, 2008, effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2008, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
*10.39 | | Retirement Agreement, dated January 19, 2015, between Registrant and G. Steven Farris. | ||
10.40 | | Employee Release and Settlement Agreement, dated February 11, 2014, between Registrant and Roger B. Plank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.41 | | Employee Release and Settlement Agreement, effective August 31, 2014, between Registrant and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300.) | ||
10.42 | | Employee Resignation Agreement, effective October 13, 2014, between Registrant and Alfonso Leon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300.) |
6
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
10.43 | | Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated May 8, 2008, between Registrant and G. Steven Farris (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2008, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.44 | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated February 12, 2009, between Registrant and each of Rodney J. Eichler and Roger B. Plank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 12, 2009, filed February 18, 2009, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.45 | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated November 18, 2009, between Registrant and Michael S. Bahorich (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2009, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.46 | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement, dated May 6, 2009, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Roger B. Plank, Rodney J. Eichler, and Michael S. Bahorich (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2009, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.47 | | Form of Stock Option Award Agreement, dated May 6, 2009, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Roger B. Plank, Rodney J. Eichler, and Michael S. Bahorich (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2009, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.48 | | Form of 2010 Performance Program Agreement, dated January 15, 2010, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Rodney J. Eichler, and Roger B. Plank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 19, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.49 | | Form of First Amendment, effective May 5, 2010, to 2010 Performance Program Agreement, dated January 15, 2010, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Rodney J. Eichler, and Roger B. Plank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 11, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.50 | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated January 15, 2010, between Registrant and each of Rodney J. Eichler and Roger B. Plank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 19, 2010, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.51 | | Form of 2011 Performance Program Agreement, dated January 7, 2011, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Rodney J. Eichler, Roger B. Plank, Michael S. Bahorich, and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 13, 2011, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.52 | | Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated February 9, 2011, between Registrant and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2011, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.53 | | Form of 2012 Performance Program Agreement, dated January 11, 2012, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Rodney J. Eichler, Roger B. Plank, P. Anthony Lannie, and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 13, 2012, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.54 | | Form of 2013 Performance Program Agreement, dated January 9, 2013, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Rodney J. Eichler, Roger B. Plank, and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 11, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). |
7
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|||
10.55 | | Form of 2014 Performance Agreement (Total Shareholder Return), dated January 9, 2014, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Rodney J. Eichler, Roger B. Plank, P. Anthony Lannie, and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.56 | | Form of 2014 Performance Agreement (Business Performance), dated February 3, 2014, between Registrant and each of G. Steven Farris, Roger B. Plank, Rodney J. Eichler, P. Anthony Lannie, and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2013, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.57 | | Amendments of Stock Option Grants (2007 and 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plans), dated February 13, 2014, between Registrant and Roger B. Plank (incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.3 and 10.4 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.58 | | Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Awards, dated February 13, 2014, between Registrant and Roger B. Plank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.59 | | Amendment of Stock Option Grants (2007 and 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plans), effective August 31, 2014, between Registrant and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.60 | | Amendment of Restricted Stock Unit Awards (2007 and 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plans), effective August 31, 2014, between Registrant and Thomas P. Chambers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.61 | | Amendment of Stock Option Grants (2007 and 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plans), effective October 9, 2014, between Registrant and Alfonso Leon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
10.62 | | Amendment of Restricted Stock Unit Awards (2007 and 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plans), effective October 9, 2014, between Registrant and Alfonso Leon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, SEC File No. 001-4300). | ||
*10.63 | | Amendment of Stock Option Grants (2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan), dated January 20, 2015, between Registrant and G. Steven Farris. | ||
*10.64 | | Amendment of Restricted Stock Unit Awards (2007 and 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plans), dated January 20, 2015, between Registrant and G. Steven Farris. | ||
*10.65 | | Amendment of 2014 Performance Program (Business Performance) Award (2011 Omnibus Compensation Plan), dated January 20, 2015, between Registrant and G. Steven Farris. | ||
*12.1 | | Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends. | ||
*14.1 | | Code of Business Conduct dated January 20, 2014. | ||
*21.1 | | Subsidiaries of Registrant | ||
*23.1 | | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP |
8
* | Filed herewith. |
| Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed herewith pursuant to Item 15 hereof. |
NOTE: Debt instruments of the Registrant defining the rights of long-term debt holders in principal amounts not exceeding 10 percent of the Registrants consolidated assets have been omitted and will be provided to the Commission upon request.
9
Exhibit 10.39
APACHE CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT
THIS EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is entered into on January 19, 2015, by and between APACHE CORPORATION ( Apache ) and G. Steven Farris ( Executive ).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Apache and Executive are party to that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of June 6, 1988 and as amended on November 20, 2008 (the Employment Agreement ); and
WHEREAS, Executive has expressed his desire to retire from officer positions and separate from employment with Apache and its affiliates and subsidiaries, and to resign from director positions, under certain terms herein set forth, and Apache desires to retain Executives services in a consulting capacity during the thirty-six (36) month period following the Retirement Date (as defined below); and
WHEREAS, this Agreement and the separation payments and other benefits described herein give valuable consideration to both Apache and Executive; and
WHEREAS, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, Executive voluntarily enters into this Agreement upon the terms and conditions herein set forth; and
WHEREAS, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, Apache is willing to enter into this Agreement upon the terms and conditions herein set forth.
AGREEMENT
1. | Retirement : Apache and Executive have agreed that Executives employment relationship with Apache will terminate on January 20, 2015 (the Retirement Date ). Effective on the Retirement Date, Executive hereby resigns from all his positions as an employee and officer of Apache and its subsidiaries and as a member of the Board of Directors of any subsidiary of Apache. Effective on May 1, 2015, Executive hereby resigns as a member of the Board of Directors of Apache. Executive agrees to take any and all further acts necessary to effectuate his resignations. |
2. | Separation Payments : Subject to any delay in payment required by the Employment Agreement or Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code ), and to Executives compliance with the terms of this Agreement, Apache will pay to Executive the amounts or benefits described in this Section 2 at the times and in the amounts described below (collectively, the Separation Payments ). The Separation Payments will be subject to all lawful deductions and withholding for taxes and any delay in payment required by Section 409A of the Code. |
1
a. | Retirement . For thirty-six (36) months following the Retirement Date, Apache will continue to pay Executive his annual base compensation as it existed 60 days prior to the Retirement Date ($1,750,000) in accordance with Apaches normal payroll practices. The Separation Payments described in this Section 2(a) will be $0 for the first six (6) months after the Retirement Date, and any such Separation Payments that would have been made during that six-month period, if not for this sentence, will be paid to Executive on the tenth day of the seventh month after the Retirement Date (the 409A Payment Date ). |
b. | Bonus . On each of three payment dates, which are the 409A Payment Date, March 1, 2016 and March 1, 2017, Apache will pay Executive $2,625,000, which is equal to 50 percent of the maximum amount for which Executive was qualified under the Apache Incentive Compensation Plan calculated on his annual base compensation as it existed sixty (60) days prior to the Retirement Date. |
c. | Welfare . For three (3) years following the Retirement Date, Apache will continue to provide individual and dependent group health insurance benefits with terms, including contributions and co-payments, consistent with those then applicable for active employees. For the first six (6) months following the Retirement Date, Executive shall pay all premium costs for the group health insurance benefits, and Executive shall be reimbursed for the employer portion of the premium costs in a lump sum on the 409A Payment Date. Beginning on the third anniversary of the Retirement Date and for seven (7) years thereafter, Apache will continue to provide individual and dependent group health insurance benefits with terms, including then applicable premium payments and co-payments, consistent with those that apply to former employees who have elected health insurance continuation under COBRA, with Executive bearing the full cost of such coverage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Apaches obligations contemplated by this Section 2(c) would result in the imposition of excise taxes on Apache for failure to comply with the nondiscrimination requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended, and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, as amended (to the extent applicable), Apache shall discontinue the health benefits or reimbursements provided for in this Section 2(c) and if such coverage is discontinued within the 3-year period following the Retirement Date, shall instead pay to Executive a payment equal to the employer portion of premium costs of health benefits provided to Executive and Executives dependents for the remainder of such 3-year period. |
d. | Equity . Apache will provide Executive with the following equity benefits: |
i. | Continued vesting of all outstanding stock options and all restricted stock units subject to time-based vesting according to the original schedules set forth in the equity plans and award agreements. |
2
ii. | Extended exercise period of all stock options, vested and unvested, to full term (10 year anniversary of the grant date). |
iii. | All outstanding TSR awards will be immediately void and forfeited as of the Retirement Date. However, in the event that the TSR and business performance goals related to such grants are achieved at the conclusion of each respective performance period, then as soon as practicable following the vesting dates set forth below (but not later than March 15 of the year following the year in which occurs the vesting date), provided that Executive is then in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement, Apache will pay Executive a cash amount equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock of Apache (determined at the close of the trading day immediately preceding the payment date) multiplied by the number of vested units indicated below. In the event that a Change of Control occurs prior to the conclusion of a performance period under the 2013 or 2014 TSR programs, and the Committee (as defined in the TSR grant agreement) determines an appropriate adjustment to measure Apaches TSR for those Apache employees that are terminated following a Change of Control, then such adjustment shall be applied to the equivalent value calculations for TSRs below. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything else in this Agreement, payments to Executive that constitute a parachute payment under Section 280G of the Code shall not exceed 2.99 times the base amount as defined in Section 280G of the Code. |
Condition Precedent |
Vesting Date |
Number of Units |
||
2012 TSR Goal Achieved |
12/31/15 | 0 units | ||
2012 TSR Goal Achieved |
12/31/16 | 0 units | ||
2013 TSR Goal Achieved |
12/31/15 | 50% of (i) multiple of Target Amount achieved under 2013 TSR Plan times (ii) 59,839 | ||
2013 TSR Goal Achieved |
12/31/16 | 25% of (i) multiple of Target Amount achieved under 2013 TSR Plan times (ii) 59,839 | ||
2013 TSR Goal Achieved |
12/31/17 | 25% of (i) multiple of Target Amount achieved under 2013 TSR Plan times (ii) 59,839 | ||
2014 TSR Goal Achieved |
12/31/16 | 50% of (i) multiple of Target Amount achieved under 2014 TSR Plan times (ii) 31,854 | ||
2014 TSR Goal Achieved |
12/31/17 | 50% of (i) multiple of Target Amount achieved under 2014 TSR Plan times (ii) 31,854 |
3
iv. | In satisfaction of Executives rights to his 2014 Business Performance conditional equity award, not later than March 15, 2015, Apache will award Executive a number of restricted stock units equal to the number of restricted stock units that would be awarded based on the determination by the Stock Plan Committee of the Board of Directors of the 2014 business performance results applicable to the senior executives of Apache, as applied to Executives 34,448 target number of restricted stock units, with the total number of restricted stock units to be awarded (the 2014 Awarded Business Performance Units) to be (A) not less than 34,448 and not more than 49,146 restricted stock units, and (B) subject to settlement in accordance with the vesting dates indicated below. |
Condition Precedent |
Vesting Date |
Number of Units |
||
2014 Business Performance Goal Achieved |
12/31/16 | 50% of the 2014 Awarded Business Performance Units | ||
2014 Business Performance Goal Achieved |
12/31/17 | 50% of the 2014 Awarded Business Performance Units |
e. | Lump Sum . Within thirty (30) days after the Retirement Date, Apache will pay to Executive a lump sum of $1,400,000. |
3. | Executive Acknowledgement : Executive acknowledges that the Separation Payments are consideration over and above that to which Executive otherwise would be entitled upon retirement, and are paid in consideration for this Agreement. |
4. | Consulting Period : During the thirty-six (36) month period beginning on the Retirement Date, Executive shall provide advisory and consultative services as reasonably requested by the Chief Executive Officer or Board of Directors of Apache, provided that Executive shall have no policy-making duties or authorities. Executive shall be eligible for prompt reimbursement for out-of-pocket business expenses reasonably incurred by Executive in the performance of his services to Apache in accordance with the policies of Apache in effect from time to time. |
5. | No Other Executive Benefits : Executive agrees that Executive will not be eligible for or entitled to receive any employee benefits other than those described herein and other than rights to transfer Executives existing paid-up variable life insurance policies and to portability of Executives disability insurance policy. |
4
6. | Release by Executive : In exchange for the consideration offered to Executive under this Agreement, Executive hereby releases and waives, on behalf of himself, his heirs, estate, beneficiaries and assigns, all claims of any kind or character for loss, damage or injury arising from, based upon, connected in any way with, or relating to the following ( Claims ): |
a. | the employment of Executive by Apache, including the termination of Executives employment; |
b. | employment discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act; |
c. | employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; |
d. | any violations of federal, state or local statutes, ordinances, regulations, rules, decisions or laws; |
e. | retaliation under the whistleblower provisions of Section 806 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 or any other anti-retaliation law; |
f. | failure to act in good faith and deal fairly; |
g. | injuries, illness or disabilities of Executive; |
h. | exposure of Executive to toxic or hazardous materials; |
i. | stress, anxiety or mental anguish; |
j. | discrimination on the basis of sex, race, religion, national origin or another basis; |
k. | sexual harassment; |
l. | defamation based on statements of Apache or others; |
m. | breach of an express or implied employment contract; |
n. | compensation or reimbursement of Executive; |
o. | any claim that he is covered under any Change of Control provisions, with the exception of those explicitly provided for in this Agreement pertaining to (i) the continuation of vesting of Apache Corporation equity, and (ii) the equivalent value of the TSR awards and the Business Performance Shares, both as provided under Section 2(d) above; |
p. | unfair employment practices; and |
q. | any act or omission by or on behalf of Apache. |
5
7. | Claims Included : The Claims released and waived by Executive are those arising before the effective date of this Agreement, whether known, suspected, unknown or unsuspected, and include, without limitation: |
a. | those for reinstatement; |
b. | those for actual, consequential, punitive or special damages; |
c. | those for attorneys fees, costs, experts fees and other expenses of investigating, litigating or settling Claims; and |
d. | those against Apache and/or Apaches present, former and future subsidiaries, affiliates, employees, officers, directors, agents, contractors, benefit plans, shareholders, advisors, insurance carriers, and legal representatives (together with Apache the Released Parties ). |
8. | Claims Excluded : Executive does not release or waive (1) any rights that may not by law be waived, (2) the rights and funds of any vested benefits and vested incentive compensation, if any, to which Executive may be entitled pursuant to the terms of Apaches benefit and incentive compensation plans, including but not limited to Executives right to all vested incentive compensation, and to any benefits to which he is entitled under Apache Corporation welfare benefit plans (including medical, dental, vision, life and disability policies), the Apache Retirement Plan, the Apache 401(k) Plan, the Apache Non-Qualified Retirement/Savings Plan, (for the avoidance of doubt, Executive is, however, releasing and waiving any claim that he is subject to or covered by any Change of Control provisions other than the continuation of vesting of Apache Corporation equity and the equivalent value of the TSR and the Business Performance Shares, both as provided under Section 2(d) above), (3) the right to recovery for breach of this Agreement by Apache, (4) Executives right to indemnity, contribution and a defense under any agreement, statute, by-law or company agreement or other corporate governance document, (5) Executives right to coverage under all Apache directors and officers, fiduciary, errors and omissions and general liability and umbrella insurance policies, (6) payment to Executive of any unpaid business or business travel expenses payable under Apaches usual practices, and (7) Executives rights as an option holder, as a holder of restricted stock units and as a shareholder. |
9. | Release by Company : Apache releases Executive, his spouse, heirs and estate from any and all claims and cause of action whatsoever that are not specifically excepted from release in this Agreement. None of the rights of Apache nor any of the obligations of Executive to Apache under this Agreement are released, and such rights and obligations are specifically excepted from this release. |
10. | Agreement Not To Sue : Executive will not sue any Released Party for any released Claim. Excluded from this Agreement not to sue is Executives right to file a charge with an administrative agency or participate in an agency investigation. Executive is, however, waiving the right to receive money in connection with such charge or investigation. Executive is also waiving the right to recover money in connection with a charge filed by any other individual or by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or any other federal or state agency. |
6
11. | Future Employment : The Released Parties will not have any obligation to consider or accept any future employment or reinstatement application from Executive. |
12. | No Apache or Executive Admission : Neither Apache nor Executive admits any wrongdoing or liability. The Separation Payments and other consideration described above fully compromise and settle any and all Claims of Executive and Apache. |
13. | Confidences : Executive acknowledges and agrees that (i) by reason of his position with Apache, he has been given access to certain non-public trade secrets, proprietary information, designs, plans, forecasting, marketing plans, strategies, policies and procedures, as well as other confidential materials and information; and (ii) the foregoing constitute trade secrets and/or confidential, proprietary information respecting the business operations of Apache. As such, Executive agrees not to, directly or indirectly, until such time as when the confidential information may become generally available in the public market through means other than provided by Executive, disclose to any third party or use for the benefit of anyone other than Apache, or use for Executives own benefit or purposes, any such confidential, proprietary information without the prior written approval of Apaches Chief Executive Officer. Executive agrees to return all electronic information, internet or cloud information, emails and attachments, documents, and writings of any kind, including both originals and copies, whether developed by Executive or others, within Executives custody, possession or control, which contain any material non-public information which in any way relates or refers to Apache or any of its subsidiaries. |
14. |
Restrictive Covenants : Because of the confidential information shared with Executive and in exchange for the payments and other consideration described herein, for a period of thirty-six (36) months following the Retirement Date, Executive, and his assigns, agrees not to directly or indirectly solicit any employee of Apache for employment elsewhere (i.e., employment with any person or entity other than Apache). It is expressly understood that unsolicited requests for employment elsewhere by Apache employees made to Executive are not prohibited by this agreement: provided that Executive immediately informs such Apache employee that Executive cannot and will not help them or refer them to any employment opportunities or employer. Moreover, Executive will not confer with any Person about employees of Apache, discuss employees of Apache with any Person, nor give any employee of Apache a reference, regarding employment. Further, during the thirty-six (36) months following the Retirement Date, Executive shall not take any action that could reasonably be expected to have the effect of directly encouraging or inducing any supplier or customer of Apache to cease their relationship with Apache for any reason. Executive agrees that for a period of thirty-six (36) months following the Retirement Date, Executive will not engage or participate in any manner, whether directly or indirectly, through any family member or other person or as an employee, employer, consultant, agent, principal, partner, more than one percent (1 %) shareholder, officer, director, licensor, lender, lessor or in any other individual or representative capacity, in any business or activity which is in direct competition with the |
7
business of Apache or its direct or indirect subsidiaries in the business of oil or natural gas exploration, development or production or the production, manufacture or distribution of any product similar to those produced, manufactured or distributed by Apache or any of its subsidiaries, or the rendering of any services similar to those offered or rendered by Apache or any of its subsidiaries. |
15. | Mutual Non-disparagement : Executive shall refrain from publishing any oral or written statements about Apache and/or any of the Released Parties that are disparaging, slanderous, libelous, or defamatory; or that would be inconsistent with fostering the goodwill of Apache; or that disclose private or confidential information about their business affairs; or that constitute an intrusion into their seclusion or private lives; or that give rise to unreasonable publicity about their private lives; or that place them in a false light before the public; or that constitute a misappropriation of their name or likeness. Likewise, Apache shall refrain, and shall use reasonable efforts to cause other Released Parties to refrain, from publishing any oral or written statements about Executive that are disparaging, slanderous, libelous, or defamatory; or that disclose private or confidential information about his business affairs; or that constitute an intrusion into his seclusion or private life; or that give rise to unreasonable publicity about his private life; or that places him in a false light before the public; or that constitute a misappropriation of his name or likeness. Nothing in this Section 15 shall apply to or restrict in any way the communication of information by either party to any state or federal law enforcement agency, so long as Executive uses his best efforts to the extent reasonably practicable to provide prior notice to Apache thereof, and neither party will be in breach of the covenants contained in this Section 15 solely by reason of testimony which is compelled by process of law. |
16. | Assistance : Executive agrees that during and after Executives employment by Apache, upon request by Apache, Executive will assist Apache in the defense of any claims, or potential claims that may be made or threatened to be made against Apache and/or any member of the Released Parties in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, investigative or otherwise (a Proceeding ), and will assist Apache in the prosecution of any claims that may be made by Apache and/or any member of the Released Parties in any Proceeding, to the extent that such claims may relate to Executives employment or the period of Executives employment by Apache. Executive agrees, unless precluded by law, to promptly inform Apache if Executive is asked to participate (or otherwise become involved) in any Proceeding involving such claims or potential claims. Executive also agrees, unless precluded by law, to promptly inform Apache if Executive is asked to assist in any investigation (whether governmental or otherwise) of Apache and/or any member of the Released Parties (or their actions), regardless of whether a lawsuit has then been filed against Apache and/or any member of the Released Parties with respect to such investigation. Executive agrees to fully and completely cooperate with any investigations conducted by or on behalf of Apache and for any member of the Released Parties from time to time. Apache agrees to reimburse Executive for all of Executives reasonable out-of-pocket expenses associated with such assistance, including travel expenses and any attorneys fees, and to the extent such services are performed after the consulting period set forth in Section 4, shall pay a reasonable per diem fee for Executives service. |
8
17. | Property : Executive represents that Executive possesses no property of a Released Party. If any Released Party property comes into Executives possession before departure from Apache premises, Executive will return the Released Party property to Apache prior to departure from the Apache premises and without request or demand by Apache. |
18. | Other Agreements : This is the entire agreement concerning Executives retirement from employment with Apache and supersedes and terminates the Employment Agreement. Executive is not entitled to rely upon any other written or oral offer or agreement from Apache or any other person regarding this Agreement. |
19. | Amendment : This Agreement can be modified only by a document signed by both parties. |
20. | Successors : This Agreement benefits and binds the parties successors, including Executives estate and heirs. |
21. | Texas Law : This Agreement will be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. |
22. | Jurisdiction : Any legal proceeding arising as a result of, based upon, or relating to this Agreement, Executives employment or termination thereof shall be filed in and heard exclusively in Houston, Texas without regard to conflicts of law and Executive hereby irrevocably consents to the jurisdiction of such courts. |
23. | Enforceability : If any portion of this Agreement is unenforceable, the remaining portions of the agreement will remain enforceable. |
24. | Fees and Costs : If litigation is commenced concerning Executives employment, termination of employment or this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys fees and expenses, court costs, experts fees and expenses, and all other expenses of litigation. |
25. |
409A Compliance : This Agreement is intended to comply with, or be exempt from, the applicable requirements of Section 409A of the Code and the rules and regulations issued thereunder and shall be administered accordingly. Executive shall be considered to have incurred a separation from service with Apache and its affiliates within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(h)(1)(ii) as of the Retirement Date, and Apache and Executive reasonably anticipate that the level of services performed after the Retirement Date shall permanently decrease to less than twenty (20) percent of the average level of services performed over the thirty-six (36) month period immediately preceding the Retirement Date. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement to the contrary, on the date of Executives separation from service within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, if Executive is a specified employee (as defined in Section 409A), then payments and benefits payable under this Agreement due to a separation from service within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code that are deferred compensation subject to (and not otherwise exempt from) Section 409A of the Code that would otherwise be paid or provided during the six-month period commencing on the date of Executives separation from service within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, shall be |
9
settled on the 409A Payment Date, or later, if so provided under the terms of this Agreement. If Executive dies during the six-month delay, the Separation Payments shall be settled and paid to Executives designated beneficiary, legal representatives, heirs or legatees, as applicable, as soon as practicable after the date of death, or such later date as is provided under the terms of this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended without the consent of Executive in any respect deemed by Apache to be necessary in order to preserve compliance with Section 409A of the Code. |
EXECUTIVE UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS AGREEMENT IS A FINAL AND BINDING WAIVER OF ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OF EXECUTIVE AGAINST THE RELEASED PARTIES, INCLUDING CLAIMS FOR AGE DISCRIMINATION UNDER THE AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT AND CLAIMS FOR SEX, RACE OR OTHER DISCRIMINATION UNDER TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964.
THE ONLY PROMISES MADE TO CAUSE EXECUTIVE TO SIGN THIS AGREEMENT ARE THOSE STATED IN THIS AGREEMENT.
EXECUTIVE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT EXECUTIVE HAS BEEN INFORMED BY APACHE TO CONSULT WITH HIS OWN ATTORNEY PRIOR TO SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT.
EXECUTIVE REPRESENTS THAT THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN FULLY EXPLAINED BY EXECUTIVES ATTORNEY OR THAT EXECUTIVE HAS WAIVED CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY, CONTRARY TO APACHES RECOMMENDATION.
EXECUTIVE ACKNOWLEDGES AND AFFIRMS THAT EXECUTIVE HAS BEEN EXTENDED A PERIOD OF 21 DAYS IN WHICH TO CONSIDER THIS AGREEMENT AND EXECUTIVE HAS VOLUNTARILY CHOSEN TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT AS OF THE DATE FIRST SET FORTH ABOVE. EXECUTIVE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT FOR A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS FOLLOWING HIS EXECUTION OF THIS AGREEMENT THAT EXECUTIVE HAS THE RIGHT TO REVOKE THIS AGREEMENT. EXECUTIVE UNDERSTANDS THAT FAILURE TO REVOKE HIS ACCEPTANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT DURING THE 7 DAY PERIOD WILL RESULT IN THIS AGREEMENT BEING PERMANENT AND IRREVOCABLE.
EXECUTIVE REPRESENTS THAT HE HAS CAREFULLY READ AND FULLY UNDERSTANDS THIS AGREEMENT AND THAT HE HAS ENTERED INTO AND EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT KNOWINGLY AND WITHOUT DURESS OR COERCION FROM APACHE OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR SOURCE.
[ Execution Page Follows ]
10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above.
APACHE CORPORATION | ||||||||
By: | /s/ William C. Montgomery | Date: January 19, 2015 | ||||||
Name: William C. Montgomery | ||||||||
Title: Chairman, Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee, Board of Directors |
||||||||
EXECUTIVE | ||||||||
/s/ G. Steven Farris | Date: January 19, 2015 | |||||||
G. Steven Farris |
11
Exhibit 10.63
Apache Corporation
Amendment of Stock Option Grants
Participant Name: | G. Steven Farris (Participant, Employee you or your) | |
Company: | Apache Corporation | |
Amendment: | This is a summary of the amendment of the terms of your previous grants of Stock Options to purchase Shares (Options) under certain prior notices (the Grant Notices) subject to the terms of the Apache Corporation 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended and the Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended (the Plans) and the related Stock Option Award Agreements (the Agreements). | |
You were previously granted Stock Options to purchase Shares in accordance with the terms of the Plans and the related Stock Option Award Agreements. In connection with your retirement from service with the Company effective January 20, 2015 (the Retirement Date) and the terms of the retirement agreement between you and the Company (the Retirement Agreement), for purposes of vesting and exercisability of your outstanding Options determined as of the Retirement Date under the Plans, upon your acceptance of this Amendment, the Company agrees that such outstanding Options will continue to vest according to their original schedules and any agreed amendments to said equity plans and award agreements as if you continued employment with the Company after your Retirement Date, provided that such vesting shall occur at such times solely if you are then in compliance with the provisions of the Retirement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, you shall not be treated as continuing employment with the Company after the Retirement Date for purposes of the Change of Control provisions of the Plans and the Agreements. Employees exclusion from receiving the benefits of the Change of Control provisions of the Plans and Agreements shall not diminish nor terminate the other rights and benefits provided to Employee regarding stock options under the Apache Corporation Executive Retirement Agreement between Employee and Apache Corporation. | ||
Affected Awards: | All outstanding Non-Qualified Stock Options under the Plans as of the Retirement Date | |
Plans: | Apache Corporation 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended | |
Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended | ||
Expiration Date: | Your Options will remain subject to expiration ten years from the original Grant Date for each such Option. |
1
Acceptance: | Please indicate your acceptance of this Amendment by executing the attached Amendment and returning it to Margie M. Harris. Upon acceptance of this Amendment you will be able to continue to access your account at netbenefits.fidelity.com. By accepting this Amendment, you will have agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in the Amendment and the terms and conditions of the Plans. You also agree to immediately notify Apache Corporation of any future change in your address or other contact information. If you do not accept this Amendment, for purposes of vesting and exercisability of your Options, you be treated as terminating with the Company on the Retirement Date. |
2
Apache Corporation
Amendment to Stock Option Award Agreements
This Amendment to the Stock Option Award Agreements is entered into in connection with the Participants retirement from service with Apache Corporation (together with its Affiliates, the Company) effective January 20, 2015 (the Retirement Date) and the terms of the retirement agreement between the Participant and the Company (the Retirement Agreement) and governs all outstanding Options under the Plans and the Agreements, determined as of the Retirement Date, between the Company and the Participant.
1. | Section 4 of each of the Agreements is hereby amended to add a new paragraph at the end thereof, which shall read as follows: |
Retirement Agreement . Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4 of any Agreement or the provisions of the Grant Notices or the Plan to the contrary, for purposes of the Options, the Participants employment shall be deemed to continue with the company following the Retirement Date provided that the Participant remains in compliance with the provisions of the Retirement Agreement. The Participant shall immediately notify the Company of any future change in address or other contact information. The Participant shall not be treated as continuing in employment with the Company following the Retirement Date for purposes of the Change of Control provisions of this Agreement, the Grant Notice and the Plan. Employees exclusion from receiving the benefits of the Change of Control provisions of the Plan and Agreements shall not diminish nor terminate the other rights and benefits provided to Employee regarding Stock Options under the Apache Corporation Executive Retirement Agreement between Employee and Apache Corporation.
2. | The remaining terms of the Agreements and the Plans shall continue in full force and effect except as provided in the controlling Apache Corporation Executive Retirement Agreement between Recipient/Employee and Apache Corporation. |
3. | This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, and by the different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when executed shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. |
4. | If any provision of this Amendment is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Amendment shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect, and if any provision is held invalid or unenforceable with respect to particular circumstances, it shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect in all other circumstances, to the fullest extent permitted by law. |
1
IN WITNESS HEREOF the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed, agreed and accepted, effective as of January 20, 2015.
APACHE CORPORATION | G. STEVEN FARRIS | |||||||
By: |
/s/ Margery M. Harris |
By: |
/s/ G. Steven Farris |
|||||
Margery M. Harris | G. Steven Farris | |||||||
Executive Vice President, | ||||||||
Human Resources |
ATTEST: |
/s/ Cheri L. Peper |
Cheri L. Peper |
Corporate Secretary |
2
Exhibit 10.64
Apache Corporation
Amendment of Restricted Stock Unit Awards
Recipient Name: | G. Steven Farris (Recipient, Employee, you or your) | |
Company: | Apache Corporation | |
Amendment: | This is a summary of the amendment of the terms of your grant(s) of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) under certain prior notices (the Grant Notices) subject to the terms of the Apache Corporation 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended, and the Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended (the Plans) and the Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreements (the Agreements). | |
You were previously awarded Apache Corporation RSUs in accordance with the terms of the Plans and the Agreements. In connection with your retirement from service with the Company effective January 20, 2015 (the Retirement Date) and the terms of the retirement agreement between you and the Company (the Retirement Agreement), for purposes of vesting of your outstanding RSUs determined as of the Retirement Date under the Plans, upon your acceptance of this Amendment, the Company agrees that such outstanding RSUs will continue to vest according to their original schedules and any agreed amendments to said equity plans and award agreements as if you continued employment with the Company after your Retirement Date, provided that such vesting shall occur at such times solely if you are then in compliance with the provisions of the Retirement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, however, you will not be treated as continuing in employment with the Company after the Retirement Date for purposes of the Change of Control provisions of the Plans and the Agreements. Employees exclusion from receiving the benefits of the Change of Control provisions of the Plans and Agreements shall not diminish nor terminate the other rights and benefits provided to Employee regarding restricted stock units, and in lieu of TSRs under the Apache Corporation Executive Retirement Agreement between Employee and Apache Corporation. | ||
Affected Awards: | All outstanding Restricted Stock Units under the Plans as of the Retirement Date. | |
Plans: | Apache Corporation 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended | |
Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended | ||
Acceptance: | Please indicate your acceptance of this Amendment by executing the attached Amendment and returning it to Margery M. Harris. Upon acceptance of this Amendment you will be able to continue to access your account at netbenefits.fidelity.com. By accepting this Amendment, you will have agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in the Amendment |
1
and the terms and conditions of the Plans. You also agree to immediately notify Apache Corporation of any future change in your address or other contact information. If you do not accept this Amendment, for purposes of vesting of your RSUs, you will be treated as terminating from employment with the Company on the Retirement Date. |
2
Apache Corporation
Amendment of Restricted Stock Unit Agreements
This Amendment to the Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreements is entered into in connection with the Recipients retirement from service with Apache Corporation (together with its Affiliates, the Company) effective January 20, 2015 (the Retirement Date) and the terms of the retirement agreement between the Recipient and the Company (the Retirement Agreement) and governs all outstanding RSUs under the Plans and the Agreements, determined as of the Retirement Date, between the Company and the Recipient.
1. | Section 3 of each of the Agreements is hereby amended to add a new paragraph at the end thereof, which shall read as follows: |
Retirement Agreement . Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 3 of any Agreement or the provisions of the Grant Notices or the Plans to the contrary, for purposes of vesting of the RSUs, the Recipients employment shall be deemed to continue with the Company following the Retirement Date provided that the Recipient remains in compliance with the provisions of the Retirement Agreement. The Recipient shall immediately notify the Company of any future change in address or other contact information.
2. | The remaining terms of the Agreements and the Plans shall continue in full force and effect except as provided in the controlling Apache Corporation Executive Retirement Agreement between Recipient and Apache Corporation. |
3. | This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, and by the different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when executed shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. |
4. | If any provision of this Amendment is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Amendment shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect, and if any provision is held invalid or unenforceable with respect to particular circumstances, it shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect in all other circumstances, to the fullest extent permitted by law. |
1
IN WITNESS HEREOF the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed, agreed and accepted, effective as of January 20, 2015.
APACHE CORPORATION | G. STEVEN FARRIS, RECIPIENT | |||||||
By: |
/s/ Margery M. Harris |
By: |
/s/ G. Steven Farris |
|||||
Margery M. Harris | G. Steven Farris | |||||||
Executive Vice President, | ||||||||
Human Resources |
ATTEST: |
/s/ Cheri L. Peper |
Cheri L. Peper |
Corporate Secretary |
2
Exhibit 10.65
Apache Corporation
Amendment of 2014 Performance Program (Business Performance) Award
Recipient Name: | G. Steven Farris (Recipient, Employee, you or your) | |
Company: | Apache Corporation | |
Amendment: | This is a summary of the amendment of the terms of your conditional grant of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) under the award notice dated February 3, 2014 (the Award Notice) subject to the terms of the Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended (the Plan) and the 2014 Performance Program Agreement (Business Performance) (the 2014 Agreement). | |
You were previously awarded Apache Corporation conditional RSUs in accordance with the terms of the Plan and the 2014 Agreement. In connection with your retirement from service with the Company effective January 20, 2015 (the Retirement Date) and the terms of the retirement agreement between you and the Company (the Retirement Agreement), for purposes of vesting of the Final Amount of your conditional RSUs determined under the Plan, upon your acceptance of this Amendment, the Company agrees that Final Amount of such outstanding conditional RSUs will continue to vest according to the original schedule and any agreed amendments to said Plan and the 2014 Agreement, provided that such vesting shall occur at such times solely if you are then in compliance with the provisions of the Retirement Agreement. | ||
Affected Award: | Final Amount of the conditional Restricted Stock Units under the Award Notice, the 2014 Agreement, and the Plan. | |
Plan: | Apache Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, | |
as amended | ||
Acceptance: | Please indicate your acceptance of this Amendment by executing the attached Amendment and returning it to Margery M. Harris. Upon acceptance of this Amendment you will be able to continue to access your account at netbenefits.fidelity.com. By accepting this Amendment, you will have agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in the Amendment and the terms and conditions of the Plan. You also agree to immediately notify Apache Corporation of any future change in your address or other contact information. |
1
Apache Corporation
Amendment of 2014 Performance Program Agreement (Business Performance)
This Amendment to the 2014 Performance Program Agreement (Business Performance) is entered into in connection with the Recipients retirement from service with Apache Corporation (together with its Affiliates, the Company) effective January 20, 2015 (the Retirement Date) and the terms of the retirement agreement between the Recipient and the Company (the Retirement Agreement) and governs the Final Amount of the conditional award of RSUs under the Plan and the 2014 Agreement, between the Company and the Recipient.
1. | Section 4 of the 2014 Agreement is hereby amended to add a new paragraph at the end thereof, which shall read as follows: |
Retirement Agreement . Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4 of the 2014 Agreement or the provisions of the Award Notice or the Plan to the contrary, for purposes of vesting of the Final Amount of RSUs, the Recipient shall be deemed to satisfy the conditions of Section 6 of the 2014 Agreement as of the Retirement Date, provided that the Recipient remains in compliance with the provisions of the Retirement Agreement. The Recipient shall immediately notify the Company of any future change in address or other contact information.
2. | The remaining terms of the 2014 Agreement and the Plan shall continue in full force and effect except as provided in the controlling Apache Corporation Executive Retirement Agreement between Recipient and Apache Corporation. |
3. | This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, and by the different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when executed shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. |
4. | If any provision of this Amendment is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Amendment shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect, and if any provision is held invalid or unenforceable with respect to particular circumstances, it shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect in all other circumstances, to the fullest extent permitted by law. |
1
IN WITNESS HEREOF the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed, agreed and accepted, effective as of January 20, 2015.
APACHE CORPORATION | G. STEVEN FARRIS, RECIPIENT | |||||||
By: |
/s/ Margery M. Harris |
By: |
/s/ G. Steven Farris |
|||||
Margery M. Harris | G. Steven Farris | |||||||
Executive Vice President, | ||||||||
Human Resources |
ATTEST: |
/s/ Cheri L. Peper |
Cheri L. Peper |
Corporate Secretary |
2
EXHIBIT 12.1
APACHE CORPORATION
STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
AND COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
(In millions, except ratio data)
(Unaudited) | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
EARNINGS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | (2,906 | ) | $ | 4,404 | $ | 4,840 | $ | 8,064 | $ | 5,167 | |||||||||
Add: Fixed charges excluding capitalized interest |
192 | 278 | 251 | 247 | 311 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Adjusted Earnings |
$ | (2,714 | ) | $ | 4,682 | $ | 5,091 | $ | 8,311 | $ | 5,478 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense including capitalized interest (1) |
$ | 499 | $ | 560 | $ | 501 | $ | 430 | $ | 343 | ||||||||||
Amortization of debt expense |
6 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 17 | |||||||||||||||
Interest component of lease rental expenditures (2) |
50 | 74 | 66 | 64 | 59 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Fixed charges |
555 | 642 | 574 | 499 | 419 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividend requirements (3) |
| 79 | 185 | 130 | 55 | |||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
343 | 56 | | | | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends (1) |
$ | 898 | $ | 777 | $ | 759 | $ | 629 | $ | 474 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
(4.89 | ) | 7.29 | 8.86 | 16.67 | 13.10 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends |
(3.02 | ) | 6.03 | 6.71 | 13.22 | 11.57 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Interest expense related to the provisions for uncertainty in income taxes under ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes is not included in the computation of ratios of earnings to fixed charges and combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends. |
(2) | Represents the portion of rental expense assumed to be attributable to interest factors of related rental obligations determined at interest rates appropriate for the period during which the rental obligations were incurred. Approximately 32 to 34 percent applies for all periods presented. |
(3) | The Company does not receive a tax benefit for its preferred stock dividends. This amount represents the pre-tax earnings that would be required to cover its preferred stock dividends. |
Exhibit 14.1
|
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT |
Our Policy
Apache will conduct its business fairly and ethically, and will comply with applicable laws, regulations, and government requirements. All conduct inconsistent with this policy is prohibited.
Apache Corporation is committed to conducting our business in accordance with the highest ethical standards. It is the policy of Apache Corporation and each of its subsidiaries (collectively and severally, herein referred to as Apache or the Company) to conduct its business fairly, ethically, and in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and government requirements. All conduct inconsistent with this policy is prohibited.
This Code of Business Conduct requires not only the avoidance of misconduct, but also the avoidance of acts or omissions that give the appearance of misconduct. Apache directors, officers, employees, and representatives shall not enter into any activity or incur any expense or liability which would compromise our commitment to these high standards. Failure to comply with this Code of Business Conduct by an officer or employee will subject the officer or employee to disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment. Any failure by a director to comply with this Code of Business Conduct shall be reported to the Corporate Governance and Nominating (CG&N) Committee of the board of directors for review, and the committee shall make a recommendation to the board of directors on appropriate action, which may include removal of such director from the board of directors.
This Code of Business Conduct is designed to deter wrong-doing and to promote:
1. | honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; |
2. | fair, full, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company (a registrant) files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and in other public communications made by the Company; |
3. | compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; |
4. | prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code; and |
5. | accountability for adherence to the Code. |
It is not possible to enumerate all of the situations which could result in an actual or apparent violation of this policy. However, the following areas are of particular concern to Apache with respect to the ethical conduct of the Companys business. These principles must be interpreted using good judgment and common sense. Employees and officers are encouraged to discuss questions or concerns relating to this Code of Business Conduct with their supervisors or other members of management, while directors should direct their questions and concerns to the CG&N Committee.
Revised: 20 January 2015 | Page 1 of 6 |
|
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT |
No Conflicts of Interest
All business decisions for Apache should be based upon what a director, officer, or employee honestly believes to be in the best interests of the Company and in the long term interest of our stockholders.
Any direct or indirect conflict of interest between a director, officer, or employee and the Company is prohibited, unless the Company specifically grants its consent. A director, officer, or employee has a conflict of interest if, in the course of his or her duties for the Company, his or her judgment and discretion is or may be influenced by considerations of personal gain or benefit, or gain or benefit to a third party other than the Company.
All business decisions for Apache should be based upon what a director, officer, or employee honestly believes to be in the best interests of the Company and in the long term interest of its stockholders. Potential conflicts of interest should be immediately reported by directors notifying the CG&N Committee and by officers and employees notifying their supervisors of the potential conflict so that an appropriate determination can be made as to whether or not a conflict exists and what remedial action, if any, should be taken.
Protecting Corporate Opportunities
Apache officers and employees are prohibited from using corporate property, information, or position for personal gain.
Directors, officers, and employees are prohibited from:
1. | taking for themselves or associates opportunities that are discovered through the use of corporate property, information, or position; |
2. | using corporate property, information, or position for personal gain; and |
3. | competing with the Company. |
Receiving or Providing Gifts and Entertainment in Furtherance of Legitimate Company Interests
No Apache employee may accept or provide a gift or entertainment that is excessive in value or frequency considering the circumstances.
The Company recognizes that customary business practices on occasion may include the provision of travel, meals, token gifts and/or entertainment by or to current or prospective customers, vendors and business partners in the course of pursuing the legitimate business interests of the Company. This policy is not intended to prohibit such legitimate customary business practices that are meant to create goodwill and enhance business relationships. No employee may accept or provide a gift or entertainment that:
1. | is not consistent with customary business practices; |
Revised: 20 January 2015 | Page 2 of 6 |
|
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT |
2. | is excessive in value or frequency considering the circumstances; |
3. | could be construed as a bribe or a payoff; or |
4. | violates any laws or regulations. |
Employees must not accept or give gifts, travel or entertainment that violate legal standards or suggest any appearance of impropriety.
Gifts of cash or cash equivalent, including gift cards are strictly prohibited.
Employees must obtain approval from their Vice President in writing (or by email) before extending or accepting an invitation to out-of-town trips including golfing, hunting, fishing, sporting events or other outings.
Special rules, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in the U.S. and similar laws of other nations, apply to those dealing with officials of domestic and foreign government agencies and companies owned by foreign governments and agencies, and the legal rules may differ in various countries. Apache has an internal FCPA Compliance Guide that governs our interactions with such officials, and our partners and customers may have policies of their own with which Apache employees are expected to comply in our business relationships. Gifts to government employees and officials, generally, are restricted under U.S. law or the local laws in the countries in which we do business. Any gift to a government employee, official or their family members must be nominal in amount, must not violate local or U.S. law, and must be approved by the Regional vice president for the relevant area before such gift is made.
Remember to exercise caution by asking questions first and accepting or giving gifts later. Questions to ask yourself that can assist you in making this determination include:
| Is it legal? |
| Is it ethical? |
| Does it feel right? |
| Have I discussed it with my supervisor? |
| Am I trying to hide this from anyone? |
| Am I trying to fool anyone, including myself? |
| Would it embarrass Apache, myself or my family if it were discovered? |
Lastly, there is another tool that you can use to help you in deciding whether to accept a gift; it is called the Newspaper Test. Think to yourself, Before I accept (or give) this gift, I should consider how it would look in a newspaper story. If you are uncomfortable with the answer, then dont accept (or give) the gift. If you are uncomfortable disclosing the gift to senior management, then dont accept (or give) the gift.
Revised: 20 January 2015 | Page 3 of 6 |
|
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT |
Proper Handling of Confidential Information
Employees shall not divulge to third parties any confidential information obtained during employment or service for Apache.
During and after employment by or service with Apache, directors, officers, and employees shall not divulge to third parties, or appropriate to their own use, or to the use of others, any confidential information obtained during employment or service for Apache. The term confidential information as used in this policy includes but is not limited to:
1. | trade secrets; |
2. | technical materials and information; |
3. | geological and geophysical information, reserve data, prospect data, maps and logs; |
4. | bid data and transaction information; |
5. | processes and technology; |
6. | compilations of information, engineering information, financial information, or specifications that are used in the operation of Apaches business or that may eventually be used in the operation of Apaches business, and |
7. | other information relating to the Companys business that is not public knowledge. |
Fair Dealing
No officer, director or employee is authorized to use unfair techniques, misrepresentation, bribes or kickbacks to gain a business advantage.
Apache is committed to conducting its business fairly and in accordance with the highest ethical standards. No director, officer, or employee is authorized to use unfair techniques, such as misrepresentation of material facts or improper concealment of business information to gain a business advantage. Additionally, no director, officer, or employee or representative of the Company shall offer or accept a bribe, kickback, or improper favor in order to secure a business advantage.
Ensuring the Protection and Proper Use of Apache Assets
Use or access to Company property for any unlawful or improper purpose is strictly prohibited.
This prohibition includes any use that is unlawful or improper under applicable law or ethical standards, regardless of the practices of other companies or individuals. As part of this obligation, officers and employees shall follow Company procedures to ensure that business transactions are consistently executed, recorded, and reported in such a manner as to allow the Company to accurately compile and report its financial statements. Additionally, all transaction records shall be preserved for the appropriate amount of time in accordance with Company policy.
Revised: 20 January 2015 | Page 4 of 6 |
|
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT |
Complying with Laws, Rules and Regulations
It is Apaches policy to conduct its business in accordance with all applicable laws, rules, regulations, and government requirements.
Each director, officer, and employee of the Company is responsible for familiarizing himself or herself with the laws, rules, regulations, and government requirements applicable to his responsibilities within the Company.
Reporting Illegal or Unethical Behavior
Each officer or employee of the Company is directly responsible for promptly reporting to the Company any actual, attempted, or apparent violation of laws, rules, regulations, or this Code of Business Conduct.
In the event that a violation is observed by, responsibly reported to, or is indicated by records or other information of which the officer or employee becomes aware, the person should report the event to his immediate supervisor, the Human Resources Department, Internal Audit, or any member of management with whom the person is comfortable discussing the matter. Any concerns regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters should be reported to the Audit Committee of the board of directors through the Companys procedures for such reporting set forth in Procedures for the submission of complaints and concerns regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters available on Apaches website at www.apachecorp.com . Officers and employees should always keep in mind that the Company supports the good faith reporting and investigation of potential violations of this Code of Business Conduct. In no event will the Company take or threaten any action against an officer or employee for making a complaint or disclosing information in good faith. Retaliation or retribution against any officer or employee who in good faith reports a violation pursuant to this Code of Business Conduct is cause for disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment.
Enforcement
Each officer and employee of the company will be responsible for enforcement of the Code of Business Conduct in his or her activity and in the activities of his or her direct reports, in consultation with the Companys General Counsel and Human Resources Department.
Disciplinary actions with regard to officers and employees of the Company will be implemented by the Human Resources Department in accordance with the Companys disciplinary procedures. Under certain circumstances, violation of this Code of Business Conduct may also result in referral for civil action or criminal prosecution.
Revised: 20 January 2015 | Page 5 of 6 |
|
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT |
Waivers
The Company does not approve of the types of conduct prohibited by this Code of Business Conduct and would grant exceptions very rarely.
In the rare circumstance where a waiver of the Code of Business Conduct would be appropriate, such a waiver for an employee who is not an executive officer must be approved by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), his designee, or pursuant to policies and procedures approved by the CEO. Any waiver of the code for a director or executive officer of the Company must be approved by the CG&N Committee and the full board, with a majority of the members of the CG&N Committee voting to approve the waiver being directors who are disinterested, as defined by applicable law, with respect to the matter giving rise to the need for a waiver. Any waiver of the Code of Business Conduct approved for a director or executive officer will be promptly disclosed to the extent required by law, regulations, or listing standards.
Revised: 20 January 2015 | Page 6 of 6 |
Exhibit 21.1
Apache Corporation (a Delaware corporation)
Listing of Subsidiaries as of February 20, 2015
Exact Name of Subsidiary and Name under which Subsidiary does Business |
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization |
|
Apache Alaska Corporation |
Delaware |
|
Apache Corporation (New Jersey) |
New Jersey |
|
Apache Crude Oil Marketing, Inc. |
Delaware |
|
Apache Deepwater LLC |
Delaware |
|
Texas and New Mexico Exploration LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache Finance Louisiana Corporation |
Delaware |
|
Apache Foundation |
Minnesota |
|
Apache Gathering Company |
Delaware |
|
Apache Holdings, Inc. |
Delaware |
|
Apache International Employment Inc. |
Delaware |
|
Apache JS Holdings, Inc. |
Delaware |
|
Apache LNG, Inc. |
Delaware |
|
Apache Louisiana Holdings LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache Louisiana Minerals LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache Marketing, Inc. |
Delaware |
|
Apache MEI Finance, Inc. |
Delaware |
|
Apache Midstream Enterprises, Inc. |
Delaware |
|
Apache Midstream LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache North America, Inc. |
Delaware |
|
Apache Caribbean Holdings Corporation |
St. Lucia |
|
Apache Finance Australia Pty Limited |
Australian Capital Territory |
|
Apache Finance Egypt I S.a.r.l. |
Luxembourg |
|
Apache Finance Egypt II S.a.r.l. |
Luxembourg |
|
Apache Luxembourg Holdings I S.a.r.l. |
Luxembourg |
|
Apache Luxembourg Holdings II S.a.r.l. |
Luxembourg |
|
Apache Luxembourg Holdings III LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Luxembourg Holdings VI LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Luxembourg Holdings IV S.a.r.l. |
Luxembourg |
|
Apache Oil Corporation |
Texas |
|
Apache Overseas, Inc. |
Delaware |
|
Apache Asia Holdings Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Asia Pacific Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Australia International Pty Ltd. |
Western Australia |
|
Apache Asyout Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache East Ras Budran Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Egypt Investment Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Egypt Holdings I Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Egypt Holdings IV Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Natural Gas Transportation Fuels LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache Egypt Holdings III Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Egypt GP Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Egypt Holdings II Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Abu Gharadig Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache East Bahariya Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache El Diyur Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Faiyum Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Khalda Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Egypt Midstream Holdings I LDC |
Cayman Islands |
1
Apache Corporation (a Delaware corporation)
Listing of Subsidiaries as of February 20, 2015
Exact Name of Subsidiary and Name under which Subsidiary does Business |
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization |
|
Apache Khalda II Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Matruh Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Mediterranean Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache North Bahariya Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache North El Diyur Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache North Tarek Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Qarun Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Qarun Exploration Company LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Shushan Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache South Umbarka Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Umbarka Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache West Kalabsha Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache West Kanayis Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache EMEA Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Exploration LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Fertilizer Holdings Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache (TAN) Pte. Ltd. |
Singapore |
|
Apache International Holdings S.a.r.l. |
Luxembourg |
|
Apache International Finance S.a.r.l. |
Luxembourg |
|
Apache International Finance II S.a.r.l. |
Luxembourg |
|
Apache Finance Pty Limited |
Australian Capital Territory |
|
Apache Ravensworth Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Australia Management Pty Limited |
Victoria, Australia |
|
Apache Australia Holdings Pty Limited |
Western Australia |
|
Apache North Sea Limited |
England and Wales |
|
Apache North Sea Production Limited |
England and Wales |
|
Apache UK Investment Limited |
England and Wales |
|
Apache Beryl I Limited |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Beryl III Limited |
England and Wales |
|
Beryl North Sea II Limited |
Cayman Islands |
|
ST North Sea Limited |
England and Wales |
|
Apache Energy Limited |
Western Australia |
|
Apache Australia Offshore Holdings Pty Ltd |
Western Australia |
|
Apache PVG Pty Ltd |
Western Australia |
|
Apache Balnaves Pty Ltd |
Western Australia |
|
Apache Colombia Exploration and Production LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache do Brasil Exploração e Produção de Petróleo e Gás Ltda. |
Brazil |
|
Apache East Spar Pty Limited |
Western Australia |
|
Apache Fertilisers Pty Ltd |
Western Australia |
|
Apache Julimar Holdings Pty Ltd |
Western Australia |
|
Apache Julimar Pty Ltd |
Western Australia |
|
Apache Kersail Pty Ltd |
Victoria, Australia |
|
Apache LNG Pty Ltd |
Western Australia |
|
Apache Northwest Pty Ltd. |
Western Australia |
|
Apache Oil Australia Pty Limited |
New South Wales, Australia |
|
Apache Onshore Holdings Pty Ltd |
Western Australia |
|
Apache Permits Pty Ltd |
Western Australia |
|
Ningaloo Vision Holdings Pte. Ltd. |
Singapore |
|
Northwest Jetty Services Pty Ltd |
Western Australia |
|
Apache Latin America II Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Madera Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
2
Apache Corporation (a Delaware corporation)
Listing of Subsidiaries as of February 20, 2015
Exact Name of Subsidiary and Name under which Subsidiary does Business |
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization |
|
Apache Netherlands Investment B.V. |
The Netherlands |
|
Apache Suriname Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Overseas Holdings LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache Switzerland Holdings AG |
Switzerland |
|
Apache Kenya Holdings LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache Kenya Limited |
Kenya |
|
Apache Overseas Holdings II, Inc. |
Delaware |
|
Apache Suriname 58 Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Onyx Acquisition Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Harriet (Onyx) Pty Ltd |
Western Australia |
|
Apache Permian Basin Investment Corporation |
Delaware |
|
Apache Permian Basin Corporation |
Delaware |
|
Apache Permian Exploration and Production LLC |
Delaware |
|
LeaCo New Mexico Exploration and Production LLC |
Delaware |
|
Permian Basin Joint Venture LLC (95%) |
Delaware |
|
ZPZ Delaware I LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache Reagan LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache Shady Lane Ranch Inc. |
Delaware |
|
Apache Shelf Exploration LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache Shelf, Inc. |
Delaware |
|
Apache Stoneaxe Corporation LDC |
Cayman Islands |
|
Apache Texas LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache Texas Property Holding Company LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache WTX Holding Company LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache Transfer Company |
Delaware |
|
Apache UK Limited |
England and Wales |
|
Apache Lowendal Pty Limited |
Victoria, Australia |
|
Apache Well Containment LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache Western Exploration LLC |
Delaware |
|
BLPL Holdings LLC |
Delaware |
|
Granite Operating Company |
Texas |
|
CV Energy Corporation |
Delaware |
|
Clear Creek Hunting Preserve, Inc. |
Wyoming |
|
Cottonwood Aviation, Inc. |
Delaware |
|
DEK Energy Company |
Delaware |
|
Apache Canada Ltd. |
Alberta, Canada |
|
Apache BC Holdings ULC |
Alberta, Canada |
|
Apache BC Investment Ltd. |
Alberta, Canada |
|
Apache Canada Chile Holdings ULC |
Alberta, Canada |
|
Apache Chile Energìa SPA |
Chile |
|
Apache Austria Investment LLC |
Delaware |
|
Apache Canada KM ULC |
Alberta, Canada |
|
Apache Canada Properties Ltd. |
Alberta, Canada |
|
Apache Canada PTP Ltd. |
Alberta, Canada |
|
Apache Canada Zama Pipeline Ltd. |
Federal Canada |
|
Apache FC Capital Canada Inc. |
Alberta, Canada |
|
Apache FC Canada Enterprises Inc. |
Alberta, Canada |
|
KM LNG Operating Ltd. |
British Columbia |
|
Northern Rockies Natural Gas Development Holdings ULC |
Alberta, Canada |
|
Northern Rockies Natural Gas Development Investment Ltd. |
Alberta, Canada |
3
Apache Corporation (a Delaware corporation)
Listing of Subsidiaries as of February 20, 2015
Exact Name of Subsidiary and Name under which Subsidiary does Business |
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization |
|
Apache Finance Canada Corporation |
Nova Scotia, Canada |
|
Apache Canada Management Ltd |
Alberta, Canada |
|
Apache Canada Holdings Ltd |
Alberta, Canada |
|
Apache Canada Management II Ltd |
Alberta, Canada |
|
Apache Finance Canada III ULC |
Alberta, Canada |
|
Apache Finance Canada IV ULC |
Alberta, Canada |
|
Apache Finance Canada II Corporation |
Nova Scotia, Canada |
|
Dove Oil Corporation |
Delaware |
|
Edge Petroleum Exploration Company |
Delaware |
|
Kitimat Development Inc. |
Delaware |
|
Phoenix Exploration Resources, Ltd. |
Delaware |
|
Texas International Company |
Delaware |
|
Wheelco Energy LLC |
Delaware |
|
Wheeler Gathering LLC |
Delaware |
|
ZPZ Acquisitions, Inc. |
Delaware |
|
ZPZ Delaware II LLC |
Delaware |
|
Phoenix Exploration Louisiana C LLC (75%) |
Delaware |
|
ZPZ Delaware III LLC |
Delaware |
4
Exhibit 23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
(1) | Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-57785, 333-75633, 333-32580, 333-105536, 333-155884, 333-174429, and 333-197491) of Apache Corporation and in the related Prospectuses, |
(2) | Registration Statements (Form S-4 Nos. 333-107934 and 333-166964) of Apache Corporation and in the related Prospectuses, and |
(3) | Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-59721, 33-63817, 333-26255, 333-32557, 333-36131, 333-31092, 333-48758, 333-97403, 333-102330, 333-103758, 333-106213, 333-125232, 333-125233, 333-135044, 333-143115, 333-170533, 333-175250, 333-178672, and 333-190619) of Apache Corporation; |
of our reports dated February 27, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Apache Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Apache Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Apache Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2014.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Houston, Texas
February 27, 2015
EXHIBIT 23.2
|
||
TBPE REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1580 |
FAX (713) 651-0849 | |
1100 LOUISIANA SUITE 3800 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5218 |
TELEPHONE (713) 651-9191 |
Consent of Ryder Scott Company, L.P.
As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-K of Apache Corporation to our Firms name and our Firms review of the proved oil and gas reserve quantities of Apache Corporation as of December 31, 2014, to the incorporation by reference of our Firms name and review into Apache Corporations previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-57785, 333-75633, 333-32580, 333-105536, 333-155884, 333-174429, and 333-197491), on Form S-4 (No. 333-107934 and 333-166964), and on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-59721, 33-63817, 333-26255, 333-32557, 333-36131, 333-31092, 333-48758, 333-97403, 333-102330, 333-103758, 333-106213, 333-125232, 333-125233, 333-135044, 333-143115, 333-170533, 333-175250, 333-178672, and 333-190619), and to the inclusion of our report, dated January 30, 2015, as an exhibit to this Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
/s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P. |
Ryder Scott Company, L.P. |
TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580 |
Houston, Texas
February 25, 2015
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, John J. Christmann, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Apache Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
/s/ John J. Christmann John J. Christmann |
Chief Executive Officer and President |
(principal executive officer) |
Date: February 27, 2015
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, P. Anthony Lannie, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Apache Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
/s/ P. Anthony Lannie P. Anthony Lannie |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
(principal financial officer) |
Date: February 27, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1
APACHE CORPORATION
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
I, John J. Christmann, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-K of Apache Corporation for the period ending December 31, 2014, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o (d)) and that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Apache Corporation.
/s/ John J. Christmann
By: |
John J. Christmann | |
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer and President | |
(principal executive officer) |
Date: February 27, 2015
I, P. Anthony Lannie, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-K of Apache Corporation for the period ending December 31, 2014, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o (d)) and that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Apache Corporation.
/s/ P. Anthony Lannie
By: |
P. Anthony Lannie | |
Title: |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
(principal financial officer) |
Date: February 27, 2015
Exhibit 99.1
APACHE CORPORATION
Estimated
Future Reserves
Attributable to Certain
Leasehold and Royalty Interests
and
Derived Through Certain Production Sharing Contracts
SEC Parameters
As of
December 31, 2014
/s/ Michael F. Stell |
||||
Michael F. Stell, P.E. | ||||
TBPE License No. 56416 | ||||
Advising Senior Vice President |
[ [SEAL]
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.
TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
|
||
TBPE REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1580 |
FAX (713) 651-0849 | |
1100 LOUISIANA STREET SUITE 4600 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5294 |
TELEPHONE (713) 651-9191 |
January 30, 2015
Apache Corporation
2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77056-4400
Gentlemen:
At the request of Apache Corporation (Apache), Ryder Scott Company, L.P. (Ryder Scott) has conducted a reserves audit of the estimates of the proved reserves as of December 31, 2014 prepared by Apaches engineering and geological staff based on the definitions and disclosure guidelines of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) contained in Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, Final Rule released January 14, 2009 in the Federal Register (SEC regulations). Our third party reserves audit, completed on January 23, 2015 and presented herein, was prepared for public disclosure by Apache in filings made with the SEC in accordance with the disclosure requirements set forth in the SEC regulations. The estimated reserves shown herein represent Apaches estimated net reserves attributable to the leasehold and royalty interests and derived through certain production sharing contracts in certain properties owned by Apache and the portion of those reserves reviewed by Ryder Scott, as of December 31, 2014. The properties reviewed by Ryder Scott incorporate Apaches reserve determinations and are attributable to the interests of Apache Corporation (U.S.A), Apache Canada Limited (Canada), Apache Energy Limited (Australia), Apache Egypt Companies (Egypt), and Apache North Sea Limited (United Kingdom).
The properties reviewed by Ryder Scott account for a portion of Apaches total net proved reserves as of December 31, 2014. Based on the estimates of total net proved reserves prepared by Apache, the reserves audit conducted by Ryder Scott addresses 91 percent of the total proved developed net liquid hydrocarbon reserves, 90 percent of the total proved developed net gas reserves, 64 percent of the total proved undeveloped net liquid hydrocarbon reserves, and 80 percent of the total proved undeveloped net gas reserves of Apache.
The wells or locations for which estimates of reserves were reviewed by Ryder Scott were selected by Apache. Apache informed Ryder Scott that the selected reserves for each country included at least 85.9 percent or more of the total discounted future net income at 10 percent attributable to the respective countrys total interests of Apache (coverage) based on SEC hydrocarbon price parameters as of December 31, 2014. Total coverage of world-wide reserves is 90.8 percent of the total discounted future net income at 10 percent.
As prescribed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers in Paragraph 2.2(f) of the Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information (SPE auditing standards), a reserves audit is defined as the process of reviewing certain of the pertinent facts interpreted and assumptions made that have resulted in an estimate of reserves prepared by others and the rendering of an opinion about (1) the appropriateness of the methodologies employed; (2) the adequacy and quality of the data relied upon; (3) the depth and thoroughness of the reserves estimation process; (4) the classification of reserves appropriate to the relevant definitions used; and (5) the reasonableness of the estimated reserve quantities.
SUITE 600, 1015 4TH STREET, S.W. CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J4 | TEL (403) 262-2799 | FAX (403) 262-2790 | ||
621 17TH STREET, SUITE 1550 DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501 | TEL (303) 623-9147 | FAX (303) 623-4258 |
Apache Corporation Total All Regions
January 30, 2015
Page 2
Based on our review, including the data, technical processes and interpretations presented by Apache, it is our opinion that the overall procedures and methodologies utilized by Apache in preparing their estimates of the proved reserves as of December 31, 2014 comply with the current SEC regulations and that the overall proved reserves for the reviewed properties as estimated by Apache are, in the aggregate, reasonable within the established audit tolerance guidelines of 10 percent as set forth in the SPE auditing standards.
The estimated reserves presented in this report are related to hydrocarbon prices. Apache has informed us that in the preparation of their reserve and income projections, as of December 31, 2014, they used average prices during the 12-month period prior to the as of date of this report, determined as the unweighted arithmetic averages of the prices in effect on the first-day-of-the-month for each month within such period, unless prices were defined by contractual arrangements, as required by the SEC regulations. Actual future prices may vary significantly from the prices required by SEC regulations; therefore, volumes of reserves actually recovered may differ significantly from the estimated quantities presented in this report. The net reserves as estimated by Apache attributable to Apaches interest and entitlement in properties that we reviewed and the reserves of properties that we did not review are summarized as follows:
SEC PARAMETERS
Estimated Net Proved Reserves
Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests and
Derived Through Certain Production Sharing Contracts of
Apache Corporation (Total All Regions)
As of December 31, 2014
% Crude
Oil & Condensate Reserves Reviewed |
% Natural
Gas Liquids Reserves Reviewed |
% Gas
Reserves Reviewed |
Reviewed by Ryder Scott | Not Reviewed | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude Oil &
Condensate MBarrels |
Natural
Gas Liquids MBarrels |
Sales
Gas MMCF |
Crude Oil &
Condensate MBarrels |
Natural
Gas Liquids MBarrels |
Sales
Gas MMCF |
Crude Oil &
Condensate MBarrels |
Natural
Gas Liquids MBarrels |
Sales
Gas MMCF |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
91.2 | 89.9 | 90.2 | 716,216 | 183,394 | 3,581,070 | 69,113 | 20,673 | 390,173 | 785,329 | 204,067 | 3,971,243 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
61.8 | 71.1 | 80.4 | 178,865 | 55,120 | 1,823,214 | 110,636 | 22,459 | 444,304 | 289,501 | 77,579 | 2,267,518 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
83.3 | 84.7 | 86.6 | 895,081 | 238,514 | 5,404,284 | 179,749 | 43,132 | 834,477 | 1,074,830 | 281,646 | 6,238,761 |
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
Apache Corporation Total All Regions
January 30, 2015
Page 3
SEC PARAMETERS
Estimated Net Proved Reserves
Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests and
Derived Through Certain Production Sharing Contracts of
Apache Corporation (Summary by Region)
As of December 31, 2014
% Crude
Oil & Condensate Reserves Reviewed |
% Natural
Gas Liquids Reserves Reviewed |
% Gas
Reserves Reviewed |
Reviewed by Ryder Scott | Not Reviewed | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude Oil &
Condensate MBarrels |
Natural
Gas Liquids MBarrels |
Sales
Gas MMCF |
Crude Oil &
Condensate MBarrels |
Natural
Gas Liquids MBarrels |
Sales
Gas MMCF |
Crude Oil &
Condensate MBarrels |
Natural
Gas Liquids MBarrels |
Sales
Gas MMCF |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
USA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
92.1 | 89.5 | 85.0 | 409,348 | 164,249 | 1,373,687 | 35,092 | 19,316 | 242,816 | 444,440 | 183,565 | 1,616,503 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
62.3 | 69.3 | 71.1 | 106,049 | 48,422 | 412,657 | 64,076 | 21,406 | 167,643 | 170,125 | 69,828 | 580,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
83.9 | 83.9 | 81.3 | 515,397 | 212,671 | 1,786,344 | 99,168 | 40,722 | 410,459 | 614,565 | 253,393 | 2,196,803 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
85.4 | 93.7 | 90.8 | 64,805 | 16,810 | 899,288 | 11,071 | 1,137 | 90,857 | 75,876 | 17,947 | 990,145 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
46.2 | 87.7 | 51.7 | 27,711 | 6,288 | 272,923 | 32,213 | 879 | 254,701 | 59,924 | 7,167 | 527,624 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
68.1 | 92.0 | 77.2 | 92,516 | 23,098 | 1,172,211 | 43,284 | 2,016 | 345,558 | 135,800 | 25,114 | 1,517,769 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Australia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
98.6 | N/A | 98.9 | 29,567 | 0 | 633,518 | 428 | 0 | 6,748 | 29,995 | 0 | 640,266 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
100.0 | N/A | 100.0 | 25,775 | 0 | 964,554 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25,775 | 0 | 964,554 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
99.2 | N/A | 99.6 | 55,342 | 0 | 1,598,072 | 428 | 0 | 6,748 | 55,770 | 0 | 1,604,820 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Egypt |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
84.1 | 83.7 | 93.1 | 108,227 | 1,126 | 593,124 | 20,486 | 220 | 43,947 | 128,713 | 1,346 | 637,071 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
33.4 | 17.9 | 91.7 | 4,881 | 38 | 157,584 | 9,736 | 174 | 14,228 | 14,617 | 212 | 171,812 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
78.9 | 74.7 | 92.8 | 113,108 | 1,164 | 750,708 | 30,222 | 394 | 58,175 | 143,330 | 1,558 | 808,883 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
98.1 | 100.0 | 93.3 | 104,269 | 1,209 | 81,453 | 2,036 | 0 | 5,805 | 106,305 | 1,209 | 87,258 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
75.8 | 100.0 | 66.7 | 14,449 | 372 | 15,496 | 4,611 | 0 | 7,732 | 19,060 | 372 | 23,228 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
94.7 | 100.0 | 87.7 | 118,718 | 1,581 | 96,949 | 6,647 | 0 | 13,537 | 125,365 | 1,581 | 110,486 |
Liquid hydrocarbons are expressed in standard 42 gallon barrels and shown herein as thousand of barrels (MBarrels). All gas volumes are reported on an as sold basis expressed in millions of cubic feet (MMCF) at the official temperature and pressure bases of the areas in which the gas reserves are located.
Reserves Included in This Report
In our opinion, the proved reserves presented in this report conform to the definition as set forth in the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulations Part 210.4-10(a). An abridged version of the SEC reserves definitions from 210.4-10(a) entitled Petroleum Reserves Definitions is included as an attachment to this report.
The various proved reserve status categories are defined under the attachment entitled Petroleum Reserves Status Definitions and Guidelines in this report. The proved developed non-producing reserves included herein consist of the shut-in and behind pipe categories.
Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known accumulations. All reserve estimates involve an assessment of the uncertainty relating the likelihood that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the estimated quantities determined as of the date the estimate is made. The uncertainty depends chiefly on the amount of
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
Apache Corporation Total All Regions
January 30, 2015
Page 4
reliable geologic and engineering data available at the time of the estimate and the interpretation of these data. The relative degree of uncertainty may be conveyed by placing reserves into one of two principal classifications, either proved or unproved. Unproved reserves are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves and may be further sub-classified as probable and possible reserves to denote progressively increasing uncertainty in their recoverability. At Apaches request, this report addresses only the proved reserves attributable to the properties reviewed herein.
Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward. The proved reserves included herein were estimated using deterministic methods. The SEC has defined reasonable certainty for proved reserves, when based on deterministic methods, as a high degree of confidence that the quantities will be recovered.
Proved reserve estimates will generally be revised only as additional geologic or engineering data become available or as economic conditions change. For proved reserves, the SEC states that as changes due to increased availability of geoscience (geological, geophysical, and geochemical), engineering, and economic data are made to the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) with time, reasonably certain EUR is much more likely to increase or remain constant than to decrease. Moreover, estimates of proved reserves may be revised as a result of future operations, effects of regulation by governmental agencies or geopolitical or economic risks. Therefore, the proved reserves included in this report are estimates only and should not be construed as being exact quantities, and if recovered, could be more or less than the estimated amounts.
Audit Data, Methodology, Procedure and Assumptions
The estimation of reserves involves two distinct determinations. The first determination results in the estimation of the quantities of recoverable oil and gas and the second determination results in the estimation of the uncertainty associated with those estimated quantities in accordance with the definitions set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulations Part 210.4-10(a). The process of estimating the quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves relies on the use of certain generally accepted analytical procedures. These analytical procedures fall into three broad categories or methods: (1) performance-based methods; (2) volumetric-based methods; and (3) analogy. These methods may be used singularly or in combination by the reserve evaluator in the process of estimating the quantities of reserves. Reserve evaluators must select the method or combination of methods which in their professional judgment is most appropriate given the nature and amount of reliable geoscience and engineering data available at the time of the estimate, the established or anticipated performance characteristics of the reservoir being evaluated and the stage of development or producing maturity of the property.
In many cases, the analysis of the available geoscience and engineering data and the subsequent interpretation of this data may indicate a range of possible outcomes in an estimate, irrespective of the method selected by the evaluator. When a range in the quantity of reserves is identified, the evaluator must determine the uncertainty associated with the incremental quantities of the reserves. If the reserve quantities are estimated using the deterministic incremental approach, the uncertainty for each discrete incremental quantity of the reserves is addressed by the reserve category assigned by the evaluator. Therefore, it is the categorization of reserve quantities as proved, probable and/or possible that addresses the inherent uncertainty in the estimated quantities reported. For proved reserves, uncertainty is defined by the SEC as reasonable certainty wherein the quantities actually recovered are much more likely than not to be achieved. The SEC states that probable reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves but
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
Apache Corporation Total All Regions
January 30, 2015
Page 5
which, together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered. The SEC states that possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves and the total quantities ultimately recovered from a project have a low probability of exceeding proved plus probable plus possible reserves. All quantities of reserves within the same reserve category must meet the SEC definitions as noted above.
Estimates of reserves quantities and their associated reserve categories may be revised in the future as additional geoscience or engineering data become available. Furthermore, estimates of reserves quantities and their associated reserve categories may also be revised due to other factors such as changes in economic conditions, results of future operations, effects of regulation by governmental agencies or geopolitical or economic risks as previously noted herein.
The proved reserves, prepared by Apache, for the properties that we reviewed were estimated by performance methods, the volumetric method, analogy, or a combination of methods. Approximately 90 percent of the proved producing reserves attributable to producing wells and/or reservoirs that we reviewed were estimated by performance methods or a combination of methods. These performance methods include, but may not be limited to, decline curve analysis, material balance and/or reservoir simulation which utilized extrapolations of historical production and pressure data available through November 2014, in those cases where such data were considered to be definitive. The data utilized in this analysis were furnished to Ryder Scott by Apache or obtained from public data sources and were considered sufficient for the purpose thereof. The remaining 10 percent of the proved producing reserves that we reviewed were estimated by the volumetric method, analogy, or a combination of methods. These methods were used where there were inadequate historical performance data to establish a definitive trend and where the use of production performance data as a basis for the reserve estimates was considered to be inappropriate.
Approximately 100 percent of the proved developed non-producing and undeveloped reserves that we reviewed were estimated by the volumetric method or analogy. The volumetric analysis utilized pertinent well and seismic data furnished to Ryder Scott by Apache for our review or which we have obtained from public data sources that were available through November 2014. The data utilized from the analogues in conjunction with well and seismic data incorporated into the volumetric analysis were considered sufficient for the purpose thereof.
To estimate economically recoverable proved oil and gas reserves, many factors and assumptions are considered including, but not limited to, the use of reservoir parameters derived from geological, geophysical and engineering data which cannot be measured directly, economic criteria based on current costs and SEC pricing requirements, and forecasts of future production rates. Under the SEC regulations 210.4-10(a)(22)(v) and (26), proved reserves must be anticipated to be economically producible from a given date forward based on existing economic conditions including the prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. While it may reasonably be anticipated that the future prices received for the sale of production and the operating costs and other costs relating to such production may increase or decrease from those under existing economic conditions, such changes were, in accordance with rules adopted by the SEC, omitted from consideration in conducting this review.
As stated previously, proved reserves must be anticipated to be economically producible from a given date forward based on existing economic conditions including the prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. To confirm that the proved reserves reviewed by us meet the SEC requirements to be economically producible, we have reviewed certain primary economic data utilized by Apache relating to hydrocarbon prices and costs as noted herein.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
Apache Corporation Total All Regions
January 30, 2015
Page 6
The hydrocarbon prices furnished by Apache for the properties reviewed by us are based on SEC price parameters using the average prices during the 12-month period prior to the as of date of this report, determined as the unweighted arithmetic averages of the prices in effect on the first-day-of-the-month for each month within such period, unless prices were defined by contractual arrangements. For hydrocarbon products sold under contract, the contract prices, including fixed and determinable escalations exclusive of inflation adjustments, were used until expiration of the contract. Upon contract expiration, the prices were adjusted to the 12-month unweighted arithmetic average as previously described.
The initial SEC hydrocarbon prices in effect on December 31, 2014 for the properties reviewed by us were determined using the 12-month average first-day-of-the-month benchmark prices appropriate to the geographic area where the hydrocarbons are sold. These benchmark prices are prior to the adjustments for differentials as described herein. The table below summarizes the benchmark prices and price reference used by Apache for the geographic areas reviewed by us. In certain geographic areas, the price reference and benchmark prices may be defined by contractual arrangements. In cases where there are numerous contracts or price references within the same geographic area, the benchmark price is represented by the unweighted arithmetic average of the initial 12-month average first-day-of-the-month benchmark prices used.
The product prices which were actually used by Apache to determine the future gross revenue for each property reviewed by us reflect adjustments to the benchmark prices for gravity, quality, local conditions, and/or distance from market, referred to herein as differentials. The differentials used by Apache were accepted as factual data and reviewed by us for their reasonableness; however, we have not conducted an independent verification of the data used by Apache.
The table below summarizes Apaches net volume weighted benchmark prices adjusted for differentials for the properties reviewed by us and referred to herein as Apaches average realized prices. The average realized prices shown in the table below were determined from Apaches estimate of the total future gross revenue before production taxes for the properties reviewed by us and Apaches estimate of the total net reserves for the properties reviewed by us for the geographic area. The data shown in the table on the following page is presented in accordance with SEC disclosure requirements for each of the geographic areas reviewed by us.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
Apache Corporation Total All Regions
January 30, 2015
Page 7
Geographic Area |
Product |
Price
Reference |
Average
Benchmark Prices |
Average
Realized Prices |
||||
North America |
||||||||
United States |
Oil/Condensate | WTI Cushing | $94.98/Bbl | $89.84/Bbl | ||||
NGLs | Mt. Belvieu Non-Tet Propane | $44.53/Bbl | $33.16/Bbl | |||||
Gas | Henry Hub | $4.35/MMBTU | $4.29/MCF | |||||
Canada |
Oil/Condensate | WTI Cushing | $94.98/Bbl | $85.94/Bbl | ||||
NGLs | WTI Cushing | $94.98/Bbl | $34.08/Bbl | |||||
Gas | AECO | $4.01/MMBTU | $3.96/MCF | |||||
Australia |
Oil/Condensate | NW Shelf | $98.81/Bbl | $100.94/Bbl | ||||
Gas | Contracts | Contract | $9.67/MCF | |||||
Egypt |
Oil/Condensate | Brent | $101.27/Bbl | $99.90/Bbl | ||||
Gas | Contracts | Contract | $2.97/MCF | |||||
United Kingdom |
Oil/Condensate | Brent | $101.27/Bbl | $103.43/Bbl | ||||
NGLs | Brent | $101.27/Bbl | $70.02/Bbl | |||||
Gas | NBP | $8.13/MMBTU | $8.60/MCF |
The effects of derivative instruments designated as price hedges of oil and gas quantities are not reflected in Apaches individual property evaluations.
Accumulated gas production imbalances, if any, were not taken into account in the proved gas reserve estimates reviewed. The proved gas volumes presented herein do not include volumes of gas consumed in operations as reserves.
Operating costs furnished by Apache are based on the operating expense reports of Apache and include only those costs directly applicable to the leases or wells for the properties reviewed by us. The operating costs include a portion of general and administrative costs allocated directly to the leases and wells. For operated properties, the operating costs include an appropriate level of corporate general administrative and overhead costs. The operating costs for non-operated properties include the COPAS overhead costs that are allocated directly to the leases and wells under terms of operating agreements. Other costs include transportation and/or processing fees as deductions. The operating costs furnished by Apache were accepted as factual data and reviewed by us for their reasonableness; however, we have not conducted an independent verification of the data used by Apache. No deduction was made for loan repayments, interest expenses, or exploration and development prepayments that were not charged directly to the leases or wells.
Development costs furnished by Apache are based on authorizations for expenditure for the proposed work or actual costs for similar projects. The development costs furnished by Apache were accepted as factual data and reviewed by us for their reasonableness; however, we have not conducted an independent verification of the data used by Apache. The estimated net cost of abandonment after salvage was included by Apache for properties where abandonment costs net of salvage were significant. Apaches estimates of the net abandonment costs were accepted without independent verification.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
Apache Corporation Total All Regions
January 30, 2015
Page 8
The proved developed non-producing and undeveloped reserves for the properties reviewed by us have been incorporated herein in accordance with Apaches plans to develop these reserves as of December 31, 2014. The implementation of Apaches development plans as presented to us is subject to the approval process adopted by Apaches management. As the result of our inquiries during the course of our review, Apache has informed us that the development activities for the properties reviewed by us have been subjected to and received the internal approvals required by Apaches management at the appropriate local, regional and/or corporate level. In addition to the internal approvals as noted, certain development activities may still be subject to specific partner AFE processes, Joint Operating Agreement (JOA) requirements or other administrative approvals external to Apache. Additionally, Apache has informed us that they are not aware of any legal, regulatory or political obstacles that would significantly alter their plans. While these plans could change from those under existing economic conditions as of December 31, 2014, such changes were, in accordance with rules adopted by the SEC, omitted from consideration in making this evaluation.
Current costs used by Apache were held constant throughout the life of the properties.
Apaches forecasts of future production rates are based on historical performance from wells currently on production. If no production decline trend has been established, future production rates were held constant, or adjusted for the effects of curtailment where appropriate, until a decline in ability to produce was anticipated. An estimated rate of decline was then applied to depletion of the reserves. If a decline trend has been established, this trend was used as the basis for estimating future production rates.
Test data and other related information were used by Apache to estimate the anticipated initial production rates for those wells or locations that are not currently producing. For reserves not yet on production, sales were estimated to commence at an anticipated date furnished by Apache. Wells or locations that are not currently producing may start producing earlier or later than anticipated in Apaches estimates due to unforeseen factors causing a change in the timing to initiate production. Such factors may include delays due to weather, the availability of rigs, the sequence of drilling, completing and/or recompleting wells and/or constraints set by regulatory bodies.
The future production rates from wells currently on production or wells or locations that are not currently producing may be more or less than estimated because of changes including, but not limited to, reservoir performance, operating conditions related to surface facilities, compression and artificial lift, pipeline capacity and/or operating conditions, producing market demand and/or allowables or other constraints set by regulatory bodies.
The proved reserves reported herein are limited to the period prior to expiration of current contracts providing the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in such production unless evidence indicates that contract renewal is reasonably certain.
The proved reserves for the properties located in Egypt are subject to the contractual fiscal terms contained in production sharing contracts. For these properties, Ryder Scott audited the gross economic inputs used by Apache in the economic models for Egypt through a comparison of Apache and Ryder Scotts gross economic volumes. Apaches gross economic volumes were then used as input to the economic models to generate the net interests used to determine the net reserves summarized in this report. Ryder Scott reviewed the fiscal terms of such contracts and discussed with Apache the net economic benefit attributed to such operations for the determination of the net hydrocarbon volumes and income thereof. Ryder Scott has not conducted an exhaustive audit or verification of such contractual information. Neither our review of such contractual information nor our acceptance of Apaches representations regarding such contractual information should be construed as a legal opinion on this matter.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
Apache Corporation Total All Regions
January 30, 2015
Page 9
Ryder Scott did not evaluate the country and geopolitical risks in the countries where Apache operates or has interests. Apaches operations may be subject to various levels of governmental controls and regulations. These controls and regulations may include, but may not be limited to, matters relating to land tenure and leasing, the legal rights to produce hydrocarbons including the granting, extension or termination of production sharing contracts, the fiscal terms of various production sharing contracts, drilling and production practices, environmental protection, marketing and pricing policies, royalties, various taxes and levies including income tax, and foreign trade and investment and are subject to change from time to time. Such changes in governmental regulations and policies may cause volumes of proved reserves actually recovered and amounts of proved income actually received to differ significantly from the quantities as estimated by Apache.
The estimates of proved reserves presented herein were based upon a review of the properties in which Apache owns and derives an interest; however, we have not made any field examination of the properties. No consideration was given in this report to potential environmental liabilities that may exist nor were any costs included by Apache for potential liabilities to restore and clean up damages, if any, caused by past operating practices.
Certain technical personnel of Apache are responsible for the preparation of reserve estimates on new properties and for the preparation of revised estimates, when necessary, on old properties. These personnel assembled the necessary data and maintained the data and workpapers in an orderly manner. We consulted with these technical personnel and had access to their workpapers and supporting data in the course of our audit.
Apache has informed us that they have furnished us all of the material accounts, records, geological and engineering data, and reports and other data required for this investigation. In performing our audit of Apaches forecast of future proved production, we have relied upon data furnished by Apache with respect to property interests owned or derived, production and well tests from examined wells, normal direct costs of operating the wells or leases, other costs such as transportation and/or processing fees, ad valorem and production taxes, recompletion and development costs, development plans, abandonment costs after salvage, product prices based on the SEC regulations, adjustments or differentials to product prices, geological structural and isochore maps, well logs, core analyses, and pressure measurements. Ryder Scott reviewed such factual data for its reasonableness; however, we have not conducted an independent verification of the data furnished by Apache. We consider the factual data furnished to us by Apache to be appropriate and sufficient for the purpose of our review of Apaches estimates of reserves. In summary, we consider the assumptions, data, methods and analytical procedures used by Apache and as reviewed by us appropriate for the purpose hereof, and we have used all such methods and procedures that we consider necessary and appropriate under the circumstances to render the conclusions set forth herein.
Audit Opinion
Based on our review, including the data, technical processes and interpretations presented by Apache, it is our opinion that the overall procedures and methodologies utilized by Apache in preparing their estimates of the proved reserves as of December 31, 2014 comply with the current SEC regulations and that the overall proved reserves for the reviewed properties as estimated by Apache are, in the aggregate, reasonable within the established audit tolerance guidelines of 10 percent as set forth in the SPE auditing standards.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
Apache Corporation Total All Regions
January 30, 2015
Page 10
We were in reasonable agreement with Apaches estimates of proved reserves for the properties which we reviewed; although in certain cases there was more than an acceptable variance between Apaches estimates and our estimates due to a difference in interpretation of data or due to our having access to data which were not available to Apache when its reserve estimates were prepared. However not withstanding, it is our opinion that on an aggregate basis the data presented herein for the properties that we reviewed fairly reflects the estimated net reserves owned by Apache.
Other Properties
Other properties, as used herein, are those properties of Apache which we did not review. The proved net reserves attributable to the other properties account for 9 percent of the total proved developed net liquid hydrocarbon reserves, 10 percent of the total proved developed net gas reserves, 36 percent of the total proved undeveloped net liquid hydrocarbon reserves, and 20 percent of the total proved undeveloped net gas reserves based on estimates prepared by Apache as of December 31, 2014. The other properties represent 9.2 percent of the total proved discounted future net income at 10 percent based on the unescalated pricing policy of the SEC as taken from reserve and income projections prepared by Apache as of December 31, 2014.
The same technical personnel of Apache were responsible for the preparation of the reserve estimates for the properties that we reviewed as well as for the properties not reviewed by Ryder Scott.
Standards of Independence and Professional Qualification
Ryder Scott is an independent petroleum engineering consulting firm that has been providing petroleum consulting services throughout the world since 1937. Ryder Scott is employee-owned and maintains offices in Houston, Texas; Denver, Colorado; and Calgary, Alberta, Canada. We have over eighty engineers and geoscientists on our permanent staff. By virtue of the size of our firm and the large number of clients for which we provide services, no single client or job represents a material portion of our annual revenue. We do not serve as officers or directors of any privately-owned or publicly-traded oil and gas company and are separate and independent from the operating and investment decision-making process of our clients. This allows us to bring the highest level of independence and objectivity to each engagement for our services.
Ryder Scott actively participates in industry-related professional societies and organizes an annual public forum focused on the subject of reserves evaluations and SEC regulations. Many of our staff have authored or co-authored technical papers on the subject of reserves related topics. We encourage our staff to maintain and enhance their professional skills by actively participating in ongoing continuing education.
Prior to becoming an officer of the Company, Ryder Scott requires that staff engineers and geoscientists have received professional accreditation in the form of a registered or certified professional engineers license or a registered or certified professional geoscientists license, or the equivalent thereof, from an appropriate governmental authority or a recognized self-regulating professional organization.
We are independent petroleum engineers with respect to Apache. Neither we nor any of our employees have any financial interest in the subject properties, and neither the employment to do this work nor the compensation is contingent on our estimates of reserves for the properties which were reviewed.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
Apache Corporation Total All Regions
January 30, 2015
Page 11
The results of this audit, presented herein, are based on technical analysis conducted by teams of geoscientists and engineers from Ryder Scott. The professional qualifications of the undersigned, the technical person primarily responsible for overseeing the review of the reserves information discussed in this report, are included as an attachment to this letter.
Terms of Usage
The results of our third party audit, presented in report form herein, were prepared in accordance with the disclosure requirements set forth in the SEC regulations and intended for public disclosure as an exhibit in filings made with the SEC by Apache Corporation.
Apache makes periodic filings on Form 10-K with the SEC under the 1934 Exchange Act. Furthermore, Apache has certain registration statements filed with the SEC under the 1933 Securities Act into which any subsequently filed Form 10-K is incorporated by reference. We have consented to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3, Form S-4, and Form S-8 of Apache of the references to our name as well as to the references to our third party report for Apache, which appears in the December 31, 2014 annual report on Form 10-K of Apache. Our written consent for such use is included as a separate exhibit to the filings made with the SEC by Apache.
We have provided Apache with a digital version of the original signed copy of this report letter. In the event there are any differences between the digital version included in filings made by Apache and the original signed report letter, the original signed report letter shall control and supersede the digital version.
The data and work papers used in the preparation of this report are available for examination by authorized parties in our offices. Please contact us if we can be of further service.
Very truly yours, |
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P. |
TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580 |
/s/ Michael F. Stell |
Michael F. Stell, P.E. |
TBPE License No. 56416 |
Advising Senior Vice President |
[ [SEAL]
MFS (DCR)/pl
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
Professional Qualifications of Primary Technical Person
The conclusions presented in this report are the result of technical analysis conducted by teams of geoscientists and engineers from Ryder Scott Company, L.P. Mr. Michael F. Stell was the primary technical person responsible for overseeing the estimate of the reserves, future production and income.
Mr. Stell, an employee of Ryder Scott Company L.P. (Ryder Scott) since 1992, is an Advising Senior Vice President and is responsible for coordinating and supervising staff and consulting engineers of the company in ongoing reservoir evaluation studies worldwide. Before joining Ryder Scott, Mr. Stell served in a number of engineering positions with Shell Oil Company and Landmark Concurrent Solutions. For more information regarding Mr. Stells geographic and job specific experience, please refer to the Ryder Scott Company website at www.ryderscott.com/Company/Employees .
Mr. Stell earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from Purdue University in 1979 and a Master of Science Degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1981. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Texas. He is also a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers and the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers.
In addition to gaining experience and competency through prior work experience, the Texas Board of Professional Engineers requires a minimum of fifteen hours of continuing education annually, including at least one hour in the area of professional ethics, which Mr. Stell fulfills. As part of his 2009 continuing education hours, Mr. Stell attended an internally presented 13 hours of formalized training as well as a day-long public forum relating to the definitions and disclosure guidelines contained in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, Final Rule released January 14, 2009 in the Federal Register. Mr. Stell attended an additional 15 hours of formalized in-house training as well as an additional five hours of formalized external training during 2009 covering such topics as the SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE Petroleum Resources Management System, reservoir engineering, geoscience and petroleum economics evaluation methods, procedures and software and ethics for consultants. As part of his 2010 continuing education hours, Mr. Stell attended an internally presented six hours of formalized training and ten hours of formalized external training covering such topics as updates concerning the implementation of the latest SEC oil and gas reporting requirements, reserve reconciliation processes, overviews of the various productive basins of North America, evaluations of resource play reserves, evaluation of enhanced oil recovery reserves, and ethics training. For each year starting 2011 through 2014, as of the date of this report, Mr. Stell has 20 hours of continuing education hours relating to reserves, reserve evaluations, and ethics.
Based on his educational background, professional training and over 30 years of practical experience in the estimation and evaluation of petroleum reserves, Mr. Stell has attained the professional qualifications for a Reserves Estimator and Reserves Auditor set forth in Article III of the Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers as of February 19, 2007.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS
As Adapted From:
RULE 4-10(a) of REGULATION S-X PART 210
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)
PREAMBLE
On January 14, 2009, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published the Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule in the Federal Register of National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule includes revisions and additions to the definition section in Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X, revisions and additions to the oil and gas reporting requirements in Regulation S-K, and amends and codifies Industry Guide 2 in Regulation S-K. The Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule, including all references to Regulation S-X and Regulation S-K, shall be referred to herein collectively as the SEC regulations. The SEC regulations take effect for all filings made with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as of December 31, 2009, or after January 1, 2010. Reference should be made to the full text under Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Regulation S-X Part 210, Rule 4-10(a) for the complete definitions (direct passages excerpted in part or wholly from the aforementioned SEC document are denoted in italics herein).
Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known accumulations. All reserve estimates involve an assessment of the uncertainty relating the likelihood that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the estimated quantities determined as of the date the estimate is made. The uncertainty depends chiefly on the amount of reliable geologic and engineering data available at the time of the estimate and the interpretation of these data. The relative degree of uncertainty may be conveyed by placing reserves into one of two principal classifications, either proved or unproved. Unproved reserves are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves and may be further sub-classified as probable and possible reserves to denote progressively increasing uncertainty in their recoverability. Under the SEC regulations as of December 31, 2009, or after January 1, 2010, a company may optionally disclose estimated quantities of probable or possible oil and gas reserves in documents publicly filed with the SEC. The SEC regulations continue to prohibit disclosure of estimates of oil and gas resources other than reserves and any estimated values of such resources in any document publicly filed with the SEC unless such information is required to be disclosed in the document by foreign or state law as noted in §229.1202 Instruction to Item 1202.
Reserves estimates will generally be revised only as additional geologic or engineering data become available or as economic conditions change.
Reserves may be attributed to either natural energy or improved recovery methods. Improved recovery methods include all methods for supplementing natural energy or altering natural forces in the reservoir to increase ultimate recovery. Examples of such methods are pressure maintenance, natural gas cycling, waterflooding, thermal methods, chemical flooding, and the use of miscible and immiscible displacement fluids. Other improved recovery methods may be developed in the future as petroleum technology continues to evolve.
Reserves may be attributed to either conventional or unconventional petroleum accumulations. Petroleum accumulations are considered as either conventional or unconventional based on the nature of their in-place characteristics, extraction method applied, or degree of processing prior to sale.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS
Page 2
Examples of unconventional petroleum accumulations include coalbed or coalseam methane (CBM/CSM), basin-centered gas, shale gas, gas hydrates, natural bitumen and oil shale deposits. These unconventional accumulations may require specialized extraction technology and/or significant processing prior to sale.
Reserves do not include quantities of petroleum being held in inventory.
Because of the differences in uncertainty, caution should be exercised when aggregating quantities of petroleum from different reserves categories.
RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)
Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(26) defines reserves as follows:
Reserves. Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known accumulations. In addition, there must exist, or there must be a reasonable expectation that there will exist, the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in the production, installed means of delivering oil and gas or related substances to market, and all permits and financing required to implement the project.
Note to paragraph (a)(26): Reserves should not be assigned to adjacent reservoirs isolated by major, potentially sealing, faults until those reservoirs are penetrated and evaluated as economically producible. Reserves should not be assigned to areas that are clearly separated from a known accumulation by a non-productive reservoir ( i.e. , absence of reservoir, structurally low reservoir, or negative test results). Such areas may contain prospective resources ( i.e. , potentially recoverable resources from undiscovered accumulations).
PROVED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)
Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(22) defines proved oil and gas reserves as follows:
Proved oil and gas reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically produciblefrom a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulationsprior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.
(i) The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes:
(A) The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and
(B) Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS
Page 3
PROVED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS) CONTINUED
(ii) In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with reasonable certainty.
(iii) Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty.
(iv) Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when:
(A) Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based; and
(B) The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities.
(v) Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PETROLEUM RESERVES STATUS DEFINITIONS AND GUIDELINES
As Adapted From:
RULE 4-10(a) of REGULATION S-X PART 210
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)
and
PETROLEUM RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SPE-PRMS)
Sponsored and Approved by:
SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS (SPE)
WORLD PETROLEUM COUNCIL (WPC)
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS (AAPG)
SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM EVALUATION ENGINEERS (SPEE)
Reserves status categories define the development and producing status of wells and reservoirs. Reference should be made to Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Regulation S-X Part 210, Rule 4-10(a) and the SPE-PRMS as the following reserves status definitions are based on excerpts from the original documents (direct passages excerpted from the aforementioned SEC and SPE-PRMS documents are denoted in italics herein).
DEVELOPED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)
Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(6) defines developed oil and gas reserves as follows:
Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered:
(i) Through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and
(ii) Through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well.
Developed Producing (SPE-PRMS Definitions)
While not a requirement for disclosure under the SEC regulations, developed oil and gas reserves may be further sub-classified according to the guidance contained in the SPE-PRMS as Producing or Non-Producing.
Developed Producing Reserves
Developed Producing Reserves are expected to be recovered from completion intervals that are open and producing at the time of the estimate.
Improved recovery reserves are considered producing only after the improved recovery project is in operation.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PETROLEUM RESERVES STATUS DEFINITIONS AND GUIDELINES
Page 2
Developed Non-Producing
Developed Non-Producing Reserves include shut-in and behind-pipe reserves.
Shut-In
Shut-in Reserves are expected to be recovered from:
(1) | completion intervals which are open at the time of the estimate, but which have not started producing; |
(2) | wells which were shut-in for market conditions or pipeline connections; or |
(3) | wells not capable of production for mechanical reasons. |
Behind-Pipe
Behind-pipe Reserves are expected to be recovered from zones in existing wells, which will require additional completion work or future re-completion prior to start of production.
In all cases, production can be initiated or restored with relatively low expenditure compared to the cost of drilling a new well.
UNDEVELOPED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)
Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(31) defines undeveloped oil and gas reserves as follows:
Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.
(i) Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances.
(ii) Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances, justify a longer time.
(iii) Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, as defined in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS